Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32649
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-3126457 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
4401 Barclay Downs Drive, Suite 300 |
|
|
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
|
28209 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(704) 940-2900
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock as
of the latest practicable date: 17,562,322 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share,
outstanding as of November 6, 2008.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
30,673 |
|
|
$ |
30,673 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
498,822 |
|
|
|
455,606 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(63,154 |
) |
|
|
(44,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating real estate properties |
|
|
466,341 |
|
|
|
441,683 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
10,672 |
|
|
|
13,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net real estate properties |
|
|
477,013 |
|
|
|
455,063 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
10,637 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
Tenant and accounts receivable, net of allowance
of $154 in 2008 and $19 in 2007 |
|
|
42,924 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated
amortization of $32,776 in 2008 and $18,728 in 2007 |
|
|
308,423 |
|
|
|
31,589 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
27,689 |
|
|
|
11,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
885,074 |
|
|
$ |
506,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
234,497 |
|
|
$ |
237,504 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
79,200 |
|
Term loan |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
23,185 |
|
|
|
5,817 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
27,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
40,302 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
Payable to Erdman shareholders |
|
|
24,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
47,751 |
|
|
|
21,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
587,354 |
|
|
|
343,981 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in real estate partnerships |
|
|
6,205 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
Minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
89,885 |
|
|
|
44,787 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock; $0.01 par value; 200,000 shares
authorized, 17,563 and 11,948 shares issued
and outstanding in 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
273,635 |
|
|
|
166,901 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(72,416 |
) |
|
|
(50,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
201,630 |
|
|
|
115,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
885,074 |
|
|
$ |
506,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
19,631 |
|
|
$ |
16,399 |
|
|
$ |
57,622 |
|
|
$ |
45,344 |
|
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
72,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property management and other fees |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
Development management and other income |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
94,019 |
|
|
|
17,298 |
|
|
|
235,767 |
|
|
|
48,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and management |
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
23,403 |
|
|
|
18,766 |
|
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
59,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
20,396 |
|
|
|
5,296 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,871 |
|
|
|
7,273 |
|
|
|
33,275 |
|
|
|
20,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
87,418 |
|
|
|
15,602 |
|
|
|
223,981 |
|
|
|
44,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before other income (expense), income
tax expense (benefit), minority interests in real estate
partnerships, and minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
6,601 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
11,786 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,743 |
) |
|
|
(4,101 |
) |
|
|
(18,695 |
) |
|
|
(11,324 |
) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated real estate
partnerships |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(6,523 |
) |
|
|
(3,916 |
) |
|
|
(17,995 |
) |
|
|
(10,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before income tax expense
(benefit), minority interests in real estate partnerships,
and minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
|
|
(6,209 |
) |
|
|
(7,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(883 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before minority interests in real estate
partnerships, and minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
(6,352 |
) |
|
|
(7,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in real estate partnerships |
|
|
(920 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,602 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares basic and diluted |
|
|
15,747 |
|
|
|
11,934 |
|
|
|
15,170 |
|
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
11,948 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
166,901 |
|
|
$ |
(1,234 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,751 |
) |
|
$ |
115,035 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,731 |
) |
|
|
(4,731 |
) |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,262 |
) |
Issuance of common stock, net of costs |
|
|
5,609 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
91,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,345 |
|
Restricted stock grants |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
Amortization of restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Dividends to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,934 |
) |
|
|
(16,934 |
) |
Adjustment to record change of interest
in the operating partnership due to the
issuance of operating partnership units
in excess of book value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
17,563 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
273,635 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
(72,416 |
) |
|
$ |
201,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,005 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
(1,621 |
) |
|
|
(2,171 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,275 |
|
|
|
20,664 |
|
Amortization of acquired above market leases and
acquired below market leases, net |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(529 |
) |
Straight line rental revenue |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt premium |
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Equity in loss (earnings) of unconsolidated
real estate partnerships |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant and accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
13,650 |
|
|
|
(852 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(7,042 |
) |
|
|
5,330 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
(9,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
24,560 |
|
|
|
17,546 |
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(130,264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate properties, net of cash assumed |
|
|
(38,633 |
) |
|
|
(91,868 |
) |
Purchase of minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
(3,807 |
) |
Proceeds from sales-type capital lease |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Purchase of corporate equipment |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated real
estate partnerships |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(16,585 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(187,069 |
) |
|
|
(96,273 |
) |
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable |
|
|
8,087 |
|
|
|
65,941 |
|
Repayments of mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(13,733 |
) |
|
|
(16,714 |
) |
Proceeds from revolving credit facility |
|
|
110,500 |
|
|
|
49,300 |
|
Repayments to revolving credit facility |
|
|
(99,700 |
) |
|
|
(80,687 |
) |
Proceeds from term loan |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
91,344 |
|
|
|
78,443 |
|
Dividends and distributions |
|
|
(22,831 |
) |
|
|
(15,919 |
) |
Equity
contributions by partners in consolidated real
estate partnerships |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
Distributions to minority interests in real estate partnership |
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(3,630 |
) |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
169,591 |
|
|
|
80,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,082 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
10,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
17,596 |
|
|
$ |
11,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Partnership Units issued or to be issued in
connection with the acquisition of a business or real
estate property |
|
|
81,673 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
Debt assumed
with purchase of property |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest assumed with purchase of property |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate costs contributed by partner in
a consolidated real estate partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
460 |
|
Accrued dividends and distributions |
|
|
9,379 |
|
|
|
5,779 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Business Description
Cogdell Spencer Inc. (the Company), incorporated in Maryland in 2005, is a fully-integrated,
self-administered, and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests in specialty
office buildings for the medical profession, including medical offices and ambulatory surgery and
diagnostic centers. The Company focuses on the ownership, development, redevelopment, acquisition,
and management of strategically located medical office buildings and other healthcare related
facilities in the United States of America. The Company has been built around understanding and
addressing the specialized real estate needs of the healthcare industry.
On March 10, 2008, the Company and its operating partnership, Cogdell Spencer LP (the
Operating Partnership), completed a merger transaction through which they acquired MEA Holdings,
Inc. (MEA) which wholly owns Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc. (now, Erdman, A Cogdell Spencer
Company) (Erdman). Erdman is a market-leading provider of advance planning and design-build
services for healthcare facilities throughout the United States of America. Erdmans service
offerings include advance planning, architecture, engineering, and construction. Combined, the
Company is a fully integrated healthcare facilities solutions company providing services from
conceptual planning to long-term ownership and property management.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and
represent the assets and liabilities and operating results of the Company. The consolidated
financial statements include the Companys accounts, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as the
Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements also include any
partnerships for which the Company or its subsidiaries is the general partner or the managing
member and the rights of the limited partners do not overcome the presumption of control by the
general partner or managing member. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company reviews its interests in entities to determine if the entitys assets,
liabilities, noncontrolling interests and results of activities should be included in the
consolidated financial statements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) 04-5 Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls
a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights and
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interim Financial Information
The financial information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is
unaudited, but includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments that, in the
opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows for such periods. Operating results for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal years of 2008 or 2007 or any other
future period. These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures
required by GAAP for annual consolidated financial statements. The Companys audited consolidated
financial statements are contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Use of Estimates in Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Significant estimates
6
and assumptions are used by management in determining the percentage
of completion revenue, useful lives of real estate properties and improvements, and the initial
valuations and underlying allocations of purchase price in connection with business and real estate
property acquisitions. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Rental Revenue and Property Management. Rental income related to non-cancelable operating
leases is recognized as earned over the term, which is the period from the date the lessee has
access and control over the leased space to the lease termination date, of the lease agreements on
a straight-line basis. Rental income recognized on a straight-line basis for certain lease
agreements results in recognized revenue greater than or less than amounts contractually due from
tenants. In addition, the leases generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse the
Company for a portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes. At times the Company
will receive cash payments at the inception of the lease for tenant improvements and these amounts
are amortized into rental revenue over the life of the lease. These amounts are included in Other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its
tenants on a regular basis and maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company receives fees for property management and related services provided to third
parties which are reflected as management fee revenue. Management fees are generally based on a
percentage of revenues for the month as defined in the related property management agreements. The
Company pays certain payroll and related costs related to the operations of third party properties
that are managed by the Company. Under terms of the related management agreements, these costs are
reimbursed by the third party property owners. The amounts billed to the third party owners are
recognized as revenue in accordance with EITF 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of
Reimbursements Received for Out of Pocket Expenses Incurred.
Design-Build Contract Revenues and Development Management. Design-Build contract revenue is
recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting in accordance with American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1, Accounting for
Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. Revenues are determined
by measuring the percentage of costs incurred to date to estimated total costs for each
design-build contract based on current estimates of costs to complete. Contract costs include all
labor and benefits, materials, subcontracts, and an allocation of indirect costs related to
contract performance such as architectural, engineering, and construction management. Indirect
costs are allocated to projects based upon labor hours charged. As long-term design-build projects
extend over one or more years, revisions in cost and estimate earnings during the course of the
work are reflected in the accounting period in which the facts which require the revision become
known. At the time a loss on a design-build project becomes known, the entire amount of the
estimated ultimate loss is recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Change orders are
recognized when they are approved by the client.
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted design-build projects
(underbillings) are included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted design-build projects (overbillings) are
included in liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. Customers are billed on a monthly
basis at the end of each month. As a result, typically the Company generates billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on design-build projects.
Revenue from project analysis and design agreements is accounted for on the completed contract
method. Costs in excess of billings and billings in excess of costs on project analysis and design
agreements are included with design-build projects over and underbillings in the consolidated
balance sheets. Revenue from development agreements is recognized as earned per the agreements and
costs are expensed as incurred.
Gains on Disposition of Real Estate. The Company recognizes sales of real estate properties
upon closing and meeting the criteria for a sale under Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate
(SFAS 66). Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits. Profit on
real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectibility
of the sales price is reasonably assured and the Company is not
obligated to perform significant activities after the sale. This includes the buyers initial
and continuing investments being adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property and
the Company not having substantial
7
continuing involvement whereby the usual risks and rewards of
ownership would not be transferred to the buyer. Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the
sales meet the requirements of profit recognition on sales of real estate under SFAS 66.
Other income. Other income on the Companys statement of operations generally includes income
incidental to the operations of the Company and is recognized when earned. Interest and other
income includes the amortization of unearned income related to a sales-type capital lease.
Income Taxes
The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational
requirements, including a requirement that 90% of ordinary taxable income be distributed. As a
REIT, the Company will generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent that it meets
the organization and operational requirements and distributions equal or exceed taxable income. For
all periods subsequent to the REIT election, the Company has met the organization and operational
requirements and distributions exceeded net taxable income. Accordingly, no provision has been made
for federal and state income taxes, except as follows.
The Company, together with Cogdell Spencer Advisors, LLC (CSA, LLC), wholly-owned by the
Operating Partnership, have jointly elected for CSA, LLC to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary
(a TRS). Consera Healthcare Real Estate, LLC has been reorganized and is now a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CSA, LLC. The Company, together with MEA, wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership
and the parent company of Erdman, have also jointly elected for MEA
to be treated as a TRS (Erdman TRS). As
TRSs, the operations of CSA, LLC and MEA are generally subject to corporate income taxes.
The Companys TRSs account for their income taxes based on the requirements of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), which includes an estimate of the amount of taxes
payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future
tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax
returns. The calculation of the TRSs tax provision may require interpreting tax laws and
regulations and could result in the use of judgments or estimates which could cause their recorded
tax liability to differ from the actual amount due. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax
effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The TRSs periodically
assess the realizability of deferred tax assets and the adequacy of deferred tax liabilities,
including the results of local, state, or federal statutory tax audits or estimates and judgments
used.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company and the TRSs began applying the provisions of the FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 for measuring and recognizing tax benefits associated with uncertain tax
positions. Penalties and interest, if incurred, would be recorded as a component of income tax
expense. There were no penalties or interest recorded during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007. The Company and the TRSs have no unrecognized tax benefits. For 2004
(Erdman), 2005, 2006, and 2007, U.S. federal and state tax returns are open for examination.
Warranties
Erdman provides standard industry warranties, which generally are for one year after
completion of a project. Buildings are guaranteed against defects in workmanship for one year
after completion. The typical warranty requires that Erdman replace or repair the defective item.
Erdman records an estimate for future warranty related costs based on actual historical warranty
claims. This estimated liability is included in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets. Based on analysis of warranty costs, the warranty provisions are adjusted as necessary.
While warranty costs have historically been within its calculated expectations, it is possible that
future warranty costs could exceed expectations.
The changes in the carrying amounts of the total warranty liabilities for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at the beginning of period |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Erdman acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(1,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred in conjunction with long-term
financings and are amortized over the terms of the related debt using the straight-line method,
which approximates the effective interest method. Upon repayment of or in conjunction with a
material change in the terms of the underlying debt agreement, any unamortized costs are charged to
earnings. Deferred financing costs were $4.3 million, net of accumulated amortization of $1.6
million as of September 30, 2008 and $1.6 million, net of accumulated amortization of $0.7 million,
as of December 31, 2007.
Per Share Data
Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed based upon the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the respective period. There were 7,372 and 13,275 shares of unvested
restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, that were not included
in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effects of their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
Concentrations and Credit Risk
The Company maintains its cash in commercial banks. Balances on deposit are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to specific limits. Balances on deposit in
excess of FDIC limits are uninsured.
One customer accounted for over 10% of accounts receivable at September 30, 2008. No
customers or tenants accounted for more than 10% of revenue for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Reclassifications
As a result of the merger with Erdman, management has revised certain presentations in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed consolidated statements of operations to
reflect the appropriate line items for the operations of the integrated business. These revisions
include new line items for design-build operations, combining presentation of management fees and
other reimbursements, and separately presenting income tax provision in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations as well as separating out tenant and accounts receivable from other
assets, accounts payable from accounts payable and other liabilities, and the combination of some
immaterial line items into new lines for other assets and other liabilities in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The reclassifications did not affect previously reported
stockholders equity or net loss.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of derivative instruments and
hedging activities by having the Company disclose: (1) how and why the Company uses derivative
instruments; (2) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS
133 and its related interpretations; and (3) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect the Companys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
9
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. SFAS 161 encourages, but does not require,
comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company has not adopted SFAS
161 and is in the process of evaluating the impact SFAS 161 may have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Financial Statement Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities (FSP No. EITF 03-6-1). FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 states that all outstanding unvested
share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in
undistributed earnings with common shareholders and should be included in basic and diluted
earnings per share calculations. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the
impact FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP No. FAS 142-3). FSP No. FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS
142). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair
value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other GAAP. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is
evaluating the impact FSP No. FAS 142-3 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 162 will be effective 60
days after the approval of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOBs) amendments to AU Section 411. The Company does not expect
SFAS 162 to have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Business and Property Acquisitions
Merger with Erdman
On March 10, 2008, the Company and the Operating Partnership completed a merger transaction
through which they acquired MEA. The transaction was effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as of January 23, 2008, as amended, by and among the
Company, the Operating Partnership, Goldenboy Acquisition Corp. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Operating Partnership), MEA, Erdman, Marshall Erdman Development, LLC, and David Pelisek, David J.
Lubar and Scott A. Ransom, in their capacities as the Seller Representatives.
The consideration payable in the merger transaction and in the contribution transactions
described below consists of cash and limited partnership interests issued by the Operating
Partnership (the OP Units). The Operating Partnership entered into contribution agreements with
40 of MEAs stockholders (the Contributors) pursuant to which the Contributors agreed to roll
over an aggregate of 1,265,392 shares of MEA (representing in the aggregate approximately 41% of
MEAs outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis) by exchanging those shares for OP Units. The
exchange of those shares for OP Units was completed immediately before the completion of the merger
provided for in the Merger Agreement (the Merger). In the Merger, all the shares of MEA (other
than the shares acquired by the Operating Partnership) were converted into the right to receive an
amount of cash to be calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Merger Agreement.
The cash consideration per share of MEA common shares payable in the Merger (the Cash
Consideration) was calculated pursuant to a formula based on an enterprise value for 100% of MEA
of $247.0 million, subject to certain adjustments. In connection with the Merger, in addition to
the cash consideration of approximately $159.6 million paid in the aggregate to the holders of MEA
common shares, pursuant to certain contribution agreements entered into in connection with the
Merger, the Operating Partnership issued OP Units to the Contributors. The number of OP Units per
MEA common share was based on the same value per MEA common share payable in cash under the Merger
Agreement, or $17.01 per OP Unit. The OP Units issued in the transaction were of two types
10
regular units and alternative units. A total of 4,331,336 OP Units were issued upon the closing
of the transaction, of which 3,063,908 were regular units and 1,267,429 were alternative units. In
June 2008, a total of 208,496 OP Units, of which all were alternative units, were issued as part of
a post-closing claim release. Up to 595,705 additional OP Units, comprised of alternative units,
may be issued based on the level of post-closing indemnity claims. The alternative units are
substantially the same as the regular units, except that the regular units have an exchange feature
whereby they are exchangeable, after a one-year lock-up period, on a one-for-one basis, for shares
of the Companys common stock, while the alternative units were not exchangeable for shares of the
Companys common stock until the exchange feature included as a feature of the alternative units
was approved by the Companys stockholders. On May 29, 2008, the Companys stockholders approved
the exchange feature whereby the alternative units will be exchangeable, after a one-year lock-up
period, on a one-for-one basis, for shares of the Companys common stock.
The Merger Agreement provides that certain adjustments to the aggregate Cash Consideration
paid will be made following the delivery of the final closing statement to the Seller
Representative. A portion of the aggregate Cash Consideration has been deposited in an escrow
account pending such adjustments. In the event that additional cash payments were owed to the
former holders of MEA shares, the escrow agent shall pay to the former holders of MEA shares that
were not exchanged for OP Units the pro rata cash amount owed to each such holder and the Operating
Partnership will issue to the Contributors additional OP Units in the same amount per share, based
on $17.01 per OP Unit. The Merger Agreement also provides that a portion of the aggregate Cash
Consideration to be paid to the former holders of shares of MEA will be held in escrow as security
for certain indemnification obligations owed by such holders to the Operating Partnership and
Goldenboy Acquisition Corp. under the Merger Agreement. Releases from this escrow will be treated
in the same way.
In connection with the Merger, one of the former MEA shareholders, Lubar Capital LLC
(Lubar), received the right to nominate one individual for election to the Companys Board of
Directors. Accordingly, the Companys Board of Directors increased the size of the Board of
Directors and elected David J. Lubar as a director on January 22, 2008. Lubar will continue to
retain its right to nominate one individual for so long as Lubar and its affiliates continue to
maintain at least 75% of their aggregate initial ownership measured in number of equity securities
of the Company and its affiliates.
The aggregate consideration paid for the Merger was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of OP Units issued and to be issued |
|
$ |
81,347 |
|
Cash consideration, net of cash acquired |
|
|
145,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
226,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Of
the total purchase price, $202.4 million has been paid and the remaining $24.0 million is
being held in escrow and is expected to be released to the sellers in November 2008 and June 2009.
Of the $24.0 million being held in escrow, $9.4 million is expected to be paid in OP Units, which
represents 595,705 OP Units. The Company has recorded a liability of $9.4 million in Payable to
MEA Shareholders related to the expected issuance of these OP Units and the company has recorded a
liability of the $14.6 million in Payable to MEA Shareholders related to the expected cash to be
paid.
The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method in accordance with SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141). The total purchase price will be allocated to assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values as determined by
management. The estimated fair values are based on
information currently available and on current assumptions as to future operations, and are
subject to change upon the completion of acquisition accounting, including the finalization of
asset valuations and working capital adjustment.
The following table is a summary preliminary allocation of the total purchase price for the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Erdman as of March 10, 2008 (in thousands). The
purchase price allocation for the goodwill and intangible assets and certain other assets and
liabilities are subject to completion of valuations.
11
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, including retainage receivables |
|
$ |
52,637 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets |
|
|
287,592 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
14,381 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(27,449 |
) |
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
on uncompleted contracts |
|
|
(37,134 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(39,989 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(23,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
226,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Erdmans service offerings and customer lists are complementary to the Companys pre-Merger
service offerings. As a result of the Merger, the Company became a fully integrated healthcare
facilities real estate company. The accompanying statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, includes seven months of Erdmans operations.
Property Acquisitions
Property acquisitions are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141. The purchase price is
allocated between net tangible and intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as
determined by management using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers of
income-producing property.
In February 2008, the Company acquired a leasehold interest in floors six and seven of St.
Marys North Medical Office Building, a seven-story multi-tenant medical office building located on
the campus of St. Marys Hospital in Richmond, Virginia. The purchase price was $4.6 million less
a $0.2 million credit from the seller for unpaid tenant improvement allowances.
In February 2008, the Company acquired East Jefferson Medical Plaza located in Metairie,
Louisiana for $19.8 million less a $0.7 million credit from the seller for unpaid tenant
improvement allowances. The facility is 123,184 square feet and is located on the campus of East
Jefferson General Hospital. With this acquisition, the Company now owns and manages 253,914 square
feet of medical office and clinical space on or adjacent to the East Jefferson campus.
In September 2008, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Genesis Property Holding,
LLC (Genesis), located in Pensacola, Florida for $2.2 million. Genesis is in the early stages of
constructing an approximately $22.4 million, 75,985 square foot medical office building and
outpatient treatment center. The project is 100% pre-leased and scheduled for construction
completion in December 2009. The Company expects to own 40% of the entity and the remaining 60%
will be owned by physician-tenants of the building.
The following table is an allocation of the purchase price of the property acquisitions during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress |
|
$ |
4,031 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
20,259 |
|
Acquired ground or air rights leases |
|
|
325 |
|
Acquired in place lease value and deferred leasing costs |
|
|
2,948 |
|
Acquired above market leases |
|
|
10 |
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
(2,722 |
) |
Minority interest in real estate partnerships |
|
|
(3,359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
21,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following summary of selected unaudited pro forma results of operations presents
information as if the business and property acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of each
period presented. The unaudited pro forma information is provided for informational purposes only
and is not indicative of results that would have occurred or which may occur in the future (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
94,019 |
|
|
$ |
96,208 |
|
|
$ |
286,581 |
|
|
$ |
284,995 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(1,942 |
) |
|
|
(1,472 |
) |
Net income (loss) per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
The Company expects to recognize amortization expense from the acquired intangible assets of
$13.2 million, $10.3 million, $4.9 million, $3.9 million, $3.0 million for the years ended December
31, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively, and $2.8 million thereafter. Goodwill is not
amortized and is associated with the Design-Build and Development segment.
4. Investments in Real Estate Partnerships
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had an ownership interest in eight limited liability
companies or limited partnerships.
The following is a description of the unconsolidated entities:
|
|
|
Cogdell Spencer Medical Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, founded in 2008, has no assets as of September 30, 2008, and
20.0% owned by the Company; |
|
|
|
|
BSB Health/MOB Limited Partnership No. 2, a Delaware limited
partnership, founded in 2002, owns nine medical office buildings, and
2.0% owned by the Company; |
|
|
|
|
Shannon Health/MOB Limited Partnership No. 1, a Delaware limited
partnership, founded in 2001, owns ten medical office buildings, and
2.0% owned by the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
McLeod Medical Partners, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability
company, founded in 1982, owns three medical office buildings, and
1.1% owned by the Company. |
The following is a description of the consolidated entities:
|
|
|
Genesis Property Holdings, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,
founded in 2007, has one medical office building under construction,
and 40.0% owned by the Company; |
|
|
|
|
Cogdell General Health Campus MOB, LP, a Pennsylvania limited
partnership, founded in 2006, owns one medical office building, and
80.9% owned by the Company; |
|
|
|
|
Mebane Medical Investors, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability
company, founded in 2006, owns one medical office building, and 35.1%
owned by the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
Rocky Mount MOB, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company,
founded in 2002, owns one medical office building, and 34.5% owned by
the Company. |
The Company is the general partner or managing member of these real estate partnerships and
manages the properties owned by these entities. The Company may receive development fees, property
management fees, leasing fees, and expense reimbursements from these real estate partnerships.
The consolidated entities are included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
because the limited partners or non-managing members do not have sufficient participation rights in
the partnerships to overcome the presumption of control by the Company as the managing member or
general partner. The limited partners or non-managing members have certain protective rights such
as the ability to prevent the sale of building, the dissolution of the partnership or limited
liability company, or the incurrence of additional indebtedness.
13
The Companys unconsolidated entities are accounted for under the equity method of accounting
based on the Companys ability to exercise significant influence. The following is a summary of
financial information for the limited liability companies and limited partnerships for the periods
indicated. The summary of financial information set forth below reflects the financial position and
operations of the unconsolidated real estate partnerships in their entirety, not just the Companys
interest in the entities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Financial position: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
56,510 |
|
|
$ |
57,406 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
50,379 |
|
|
|
50,725 |
|
Members equity |
|
|
6,131 |
|
|
|
6,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Results of operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
|
$ |
3,052 |
|
|
$ |
9,107 |
|
|
$ |
9,119 |
|
Operating and general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
3,853 |
|
Net income |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
5. Business Segments
The Company has two identified reportable segments: (1) property operations and (2)
design-build and development. The Company defines business segments by their distinct customer
base and service provided. Each segment operates under a separate management group and produces
discrete financial information, which is reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make
resource allocation decisions and assess performance.
The Companys management evaluates the operating performance of its operating segments based
on funds from operations (FFO) and funds from operations modified (FFOM). FFO, as defined by
the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, represents net income (computed in
accordance with GAAP), excluding gains from sales of property, plus real estate depreciation and
amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company adjusts the NAREIT definition to add
back minority interests in the Operating Partnership. FFOM adds back to FFO non-cash amortization
of non-real estate related intangible assets associated with purchase accounting. The Company
presents FFO and FFOM because the Company considers them as important supplemental measures of the
Companys operational performance. The Company believes FFO is frequently used by securities
analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present
FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and
amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate assets
diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with
market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains
and losses from property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure
that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy
rates, rental rates, operating costs, development activities and interest costs, providing
perspective not immediately apparent from net income. The Companys methodology may differ from
the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be
comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO and FFOM do not represent amounts available for
managements discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service
obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO or FFOM should not be considered as
alternatives to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the
Companys performance, nor are they indicative of funds available to fund the Companys cash needs,
including the Companys ability to pay dividends or make distributions.
In periods prior to 2008, the Company presented segment net operating income for property
operations and real estate services, where the real estate services segment included property
management services. Due to the Merger with Erdman, the presentation of discrete financial
information was modified and Company management no longer uses those segment measures when making
resource allocation decisions.
14
The following tables represent the segment information for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-Build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
and |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Development |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
19,631 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,631 |
|
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,914 |
|
Property management and other fees |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852 |
|
Development management and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
20,483 |
|
|
|
73,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and management |
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,370 |
|
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,578 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain operating expenses |
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
|
64,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,113 |
|
|
|
9,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,743 |
) |
|
|
(6,743 |
) |
Provision for income taxes applicable to funds from
operations modified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,411 |
) |
|
|
(2,411 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
Earnings from unconsolidated real estate partnerships,
before real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Minority interests in real estate partnerships, before
real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations modified (FFOM) |
|
|
11,292 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
(11,930 |
) |
|
|
8,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles related to purchase
accounting, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(3,876 |
) |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) |
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
4,921 |
|
|
|
(10,402 |
) |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,494 |
) |
Minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,921 |
|
|
$ |
(9,763 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
575,244 |
|
|
$ |
308,878 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
885,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-Build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
and |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Development |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
16,399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,399 |
|
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management and other fees |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
874 |
|
Development management and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
17,273 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and management |
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,797 |
|
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain operating expenses |
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
|
|
(1,421 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,101 |
) |
|
|
(4,101 |
) |
Provision for income taxes applicable to funds from
operations modified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Earnings from unconsolidated real estate partnerships,
before real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Minority interests in real estate partnerships, before
real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations modified (FFOM) |
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(5,524 |
) |
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles related to purchase
accounting, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) |
|
|
10,557 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(5,508 |
) |
|
|
4,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,180 |
) |
Minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
3,377 |
|
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,893 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
474,856 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
475,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following tables represent the segment information for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-Build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
and |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Development |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
57,622 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57,622 |
|
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,870 |
|
Property management and other fees |
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
Development management and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
60,146 |
|
|
|
175,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and management |
|
|
23,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,403 |
|
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,907 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain operating expenses |
|
|
23,403 |
|
|
|
159,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,743 |
|
|
|
16,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,848 |
) |
|
|
(7,848 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,695 |
) |
|
|
(18,695 |
) |
Provision for income taxes applicable to funds from
operations modified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,719 |
) |
|
|
(3,719 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(948 |
) |
Earnings from unconsolidated real estate partnerships,
before real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Minority interests in real estate partnerships, before
real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations modified (FFOM) |
|
|
36,097 |
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
|
|
(30,349 |
) |
|
|
21,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles related to purchase
accounting, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(9,043 |
) |
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
(5,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) |
|
|
35,970 |
|
|
|
6,488 |
|
|
|
(26,773 |
) |
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(22,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,896 |
) |
Minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
13,074 |
|
|
$ |
6,488 |
|
|
$ |
(24,293 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
575,244 |
|
|
$ |
308,878 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
$ |
885,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design-Build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
and |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Development |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
45,344 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,344 |
|
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property management and other fees |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,644 |
|
Development management and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
47,988 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating and management |
|
|
18,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,766 |
|
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain operating expenses |
|
|
18,766 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,222 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,919 |
) |
|
|
(4,919 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,324 |
) |
|
|
(11,324 |
) |
Provision for income taxes applicable to funds from
operations modified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Earnings from unconsolidated real estate partnerships,
before real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Minority interests in real estate partnerships, before
real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations modified (FFOM) |
|
|
29,550 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(16,445 |
) |
|
|
13,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles related to purchase
accounting, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) |
|
|
29,423 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(16,395 |
) |
|
|
13,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(20,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,395 |
) |
Minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,028 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
(14,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
474,856 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
475,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
6. Contracts
Revenue and billings to date on uncompleted contracts, from their inception, as of September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
$ |
257,402 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Billings to date |
|
|
(280,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
$ |
(23,071 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These amounts are included in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 as shown below (in thousands). At September 30, 2008, the Company had retainage
receivables of $10.2 million, which are included in Tenant and accounts receivable in the
consolidated balance sheets. Amounts for billed retainages and receivables to be collected in
excess of one year are not significant for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings (1) |
|
$ |
4,545 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
|
(27,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
|
$ |
(23,071 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet |
7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets consisted of the following at September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
5,335 |
|
|
$ |
5,335 |
|
Intangible assets related to the Erdman acquisition,
net of accumulated amortization of $9,043 in 2008 |
|
|
278,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired above market leases, net of accumulated
amortization of $693 in 2008 and $516 in 2007 |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
Acquired in place lease value and deferred leasing costs,
net of accumulated amortization of $22,300 in 2008 and
$17,739 in 2007 |
|
|
18,745 |
|
|
|
20,359 |
|
Acquired ground leases, net of accumulated amortization
of $357 in 2008 and $217 in 2007 |
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
Acquired property management contracts, net of
accumulated amortization of $383 in 2008 and $256
in 2007 |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
308,423 |
|
|
$ |
31,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
8. Mortgage Notes Payable and Borrowing Agreements
Revolving Credit Facility
On March 10, 2008, the Company amended and restated its existing revolving credit facility,
dated November 1, 2005, among the Company, the Operating Partnership, Bank of America, N.A.,
Citicorp North America, Inc., Branch Banking and Trust Company, Banc of America Securities LLC,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and other lenders (the Credit Facility). Banc of America Securities
LLC is acting as sole lead arranger and sole book manager of the Credit Facility. KeyBank National
Association is acting as syndication agent. Branch Banking and Trust Company and Wachovia Bank, N.A.
are acting as co-documentation agents. Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank National Association, Branch
Banking and Trust Company, Wachovia Bank, National Association, M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank, and
Citicorp North America, Inc. are lenders (the Lenders) thereunder. The Credit Facility is secured
by certain of the Companys properties and is guaranteed by the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility matures on March 10, 2011, subject to a one-year extension at the
Companys option conditioned upon the Lenders being satisfied with the Company and its
subsidiaries financial condition and liquidity, and taking into consideration any payment,
extension or refinancing of the Term Loan (as described below). The Credit Facility is cross
defaulted against the Term Loan. The Company is subject to customary covenants including, but not
limited to, (1) affirmative covenants relating to the Companys corporate structure and ownership,
maintenance of insurance, compliance with environmental laws and preparation of environmental
reports, maintenance of the Companys REIT qualification and listing on the NYSE, (2) negative
covenants relating to restrictions on liens, indebtedness, certain investments (including loans and
certain advances), mergers and other fundamental changes, sales and other dispositions of property
or assets and transactions with affiliates, and (3) financial covenants to be met by the Company at
all times including a maximum total leverage ratio (70%), maximum real estate leverage ratio (70%),
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio (1.50 to 1.00), maximum total debt to real estate value ratio
(90%) and minimum consolidated tangible net worth ($45 million plus 85% of the net proceeds of
equity issuances issued after the closing date). The interest rate on loans under the Credit
Facility equals, at the Companys election, either (1) LIBOR (3.93% as of September 30, 2008) plus
a margin of between 95 to 140 basis points based on the Companys leverage ratio or (2) the higher
of the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points or Bank of America, N.A.s prime rate (5.00% as of
September 30, 2008).
As of September 30, 2008, there was $51.9 million available under the Credit Facility. There
was $90.0 million outstanding at September 30, 2008 and $8.1 million of availability was restricted
related to outstanding letters of credit.
Term Loan
The Company, through its Erdman TRS, has $100.0 million outstanding under a $100.0 million
senior secured term facility (the Term Loan) to finance the cash portion of the Merger. Keybanc
Capital Markets is acting as sole lead arranger and sole book manager of the Term Loan. Bank of
America, N.A. is acting as syndication agent. Branch Banking and Trust Company and Wachovia Bank,
N.A. are acting as co-documentation agents. KeyBank National Association, Bank of America, N.A.,
Branch Banking and Trust Company, Wachovia Bank, National Association, M&I Marshall and Ilsley
Bank, and Citicorp North America, Inc. are lenders thereunder. The Term Loan is secured by the
stock and certain accounts receivables of Erdman and is guaranteed by the Company. The Term Loan
matures on March 10, 2011, and is subject to a one-time right to a one-year extension at the
Companys option (and the payment of an extension fee). The Term Loan contains customary covenants
including, but not limited to, (1) affirmative covenants relating to the Companys corporate
structure and ownership, maintenance of insurance, compliance with environmental laws and
preparation of environmental reports, maintenance of the
Companys REIT qualification and listing on the
New York Stock Exchange, (2) negative covenants relating to restrictions on liens, indebtedness,
certain investments (including loans and certain advances), mergers and other fundamental changes,
sales and other dispositions of property or assets and transactions with affiliates, and (3)
financial covenants to be met by the Company at all times under the guaranty including a maximum
total leverage ratio (70%), maximum real estate leverage ratio (70%), minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio (1.50 to 1.00), maximum total debt to real estate value ratio (90%) and minimum consolidated
tangible net worth ($45 million plus 85% of the
net proceeds of equity issuances), as well as being cross defaulted to the Companys Credit
Facility. In addition, there are financial covenants relating only to Erdman. The interest rate on
loans under the Term Loan equals, at the
20
Companys election, either (1) LIBOR (3.93% as of
September 30, 2008) plus a margin of between 300 to 350 basis points based on certain Erdman
performance ratios or (2) (i) the higher of the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points or KeyBank
National Associations prime rate (ii) plus a margin of between 300 to 350 basis points based on
certain Erdman performance ratios (5.00% as of September 30, 2008).
Mortgage Notes Payable
Mebane Medical Investors, LLC, a consolidated real estate partnership, has construction
financing related to the Mebane Medical Office Building project. The credit facility provides
financing of up to $13.0 million with an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 1.3% (5.23% as of
September 30, 2008). The mortgage note payable will mature in May 2010 and provides for
interest-only payments through May 2009 and principal payments based on a 30-year amortization from
June 2009 through the maturity date in May 2010. This facility has two one-year extension options.
As of September 30, 2008, there was a total of $12.1 million drawn on the facility.
In July 2008, the Company refinanced the mortgage note payable for Rocky Mount MOB, LLC, a
consolidated real estate partnership. Terms of the note payable require monthly payments of
approximately $35,000 through March 2012, at which time the remaining principal is due. The note
payable has a fixed interest rate of 6.03%. The principal balance was increased by $1.3 million to
$5.4 million.
Genesis Property Holding, LLC, a consolidated real estate partnership, has construction
financing related to the Pensacola, Florida, medical office building and cancer center project.
The financing provides for an amount up to $16.8 million and for a total term of ten years,
inclusive of an 18-month construction period. The loan calls for payments of interest-only during
the construction period at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 1.50%. After the construction period,
the loan converts to an amortizing loan with monthly payments based on a 25-year amortization
schedule. The Company has entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement that
effectively fixes the interest rate at 6.21% after the construction period through maturity. The
loan matures September 2018.
In September 2008, the Company paid off the remaining principal balance of $8.6 million on the
mortgage note payable for Medical Investors I, LLC.
Scheduled Maturities
Scheduled maturities of the mortgage notes payable and borrowing agreements as of September
30, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the period ending: |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
13,466 |
|
2009 |
|
|
47,560 |
|
2010 |
|
|
31,109 |
|
2011 |
|
|
212,386 |
|
2012 |
|
|
11,145 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
108,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,262 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
424,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
21
9. Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest rate swap agreements are utilized to reduce exposure to variable interest rates
associated with certain mortgage notes payable and credit facilities. These agreements involve an
exchange of fixed and floating interest payments without the exchange of the underlying principal
amount (the notional amount). The interest rate swap agreements are reported at fair value in the
consolidated balance sheet within Other assets or Other liabilities and changes in the fair
value, net of tax, are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) exclusive of
ineffectiveness amounts.
The following table summarizes the terms of the agreements and their fair values at September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity |
|
2008 |
|
|
Receive Rate |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
Beaufort Medical Plaza, LLC (1) |
|
$ |
4,932 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
8/18/2008 |
|
|
|
8/18/2011 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Beaufort Medical Plaza, LLC |
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
5.01 |
% |
|
|
10/25/2006 |
|
|
|
7/25/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Cogdell Health Campus MOB, LP |
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
3/14/2008 |
|
|
|
3/2/2015 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indianapolis MOB LLC |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
11/6/2006 |
|
|
|
10/31/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689 |
|
River Hills Medical Associates, LLC |
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
|
10/16/2006 |
|
|
|
12/15/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Roper MOB, LLC |
|
|
9,277 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
10/10/2006 |
|
|
|
7/10/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
St. Francis Community MOB, LLC (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
St. Francis Medical Plaza, LLC (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Genesis Property Holdings, LLC |
|
|
16,797 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
4/1/2010 |
|
|
|
10/1/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEA Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
4/1/2008 |
|
|
|
3/1/2011 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cogdell Spencer LP (3) |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
10/15/2008 |
|
|
|
3/10/2011 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cogdell Spencer LP |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
8/14/2007 |
|
|
|
10/31/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Cogdell Spencer LP |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
1 Month LIBOR |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
8/20/2007 |
|
|
|
10/31/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Swap agreement represents the renewal of the agreement ended 7/25/2008.
|
|
(2) |
|
Swap agreements expired on June 15, 2008 and were not renewed.
|
|
(3) |
|
Swap agreement intended to replace the prior two agreements that
expired on 10/31/2008. |
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157)
for financial assets and liabilities. The FASB issued Staff Position No. SFAS 157-1, Application of
FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address
Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification of Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP 157-1). FSP 157-1 excludes SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, as well as other accounting
pronouncements that address fair value measurements on lease classification or measurement under
SFAS No. 13, from the scope of SFAS No. 157. As permitted by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No 157, the Company elected to defer the adoption of SFAS 157
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 defines fair
value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and also expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
SFAS 157 utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques
used to measure fair value into three broad levels. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs
utilize observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities we have the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs
other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets and inputs other than quoted prices observable for the asset or liability. Level 3
inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is
little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In instances in which the inputs used
to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the
fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety has been determined is
based on the lowest level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The
Companys assessment of the
22
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its
entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
To obtain fair values, observable market prices are used if available. In some instances,
observable market prices are not readily available for certain financial instruments and fair value
is determined using present value or other techniques appropriate for a particular financial
instrument. These techniques involve some degree of judgment and as a result are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange. The use of
different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair
value amounts.
The following table presents information about the Companys assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008, and indicates the fair value hierarchy
of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,737 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
(930 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(930 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
The valuation of derivative financial instruments is determined using widely accepted
valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each
derivative. The fair values of variable to fixed interest rate swaps are determined using the
market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments and the discounted
expected variable cash receipts. The variable cash receipts are based on an expectation of future
interest rates forward curves derived from observable market interest rate curves. The fair values
of interest rate caps are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the
future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike
rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the
cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest
rate curves and volatilities. To comply with the provisions of SFAS 157, the Company incorporates
credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its nonperformance risk and the
respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the
fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has
considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral
postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
10. Minority Interests in Operating Partnership
As of September 30, 2008, there were 26.8 million OP Units outstanding, of which 17.6 million,
or 65.5%, were owned by the Company and 9.2 million, or 34.5%, were owned by other partners,
including certain directors, officers and other members of senior management. As of September 30,
2008, the fair market value of the OP Units not owned by the Company was $152.8 million, based on a
market value of $16.54 per unit, which was closing stock price of the Companys shares on September
30, 2008.
11. Dividends and Distributions
On September 11, 2008, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had declared a
quarterly distribution of $0.35 per share or OP Unit that was paid on October 20, 2008 to
stockholders and holders of OP Units of record on September 26, 2008. The distribution covered the
third quarter of 2008 and $9.4 million is included in Other liabilities in the September 30, 2008
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
23
12. Incentive Plan
Effective February 27, 2008, each non-employee member of the Companys Board of Directors was
granted shares of restricted stock or long-term incentive plan units (LTIP units) in the
Operating Partnership that all vested upon issuance. Messrs Georgius and Lee and Dr. Smoak were
each granted 3,135 LTIP units and Messrs Jennings and Neugent were each granted 3,135 shares of
restricted stock. The restricted stock and LTIP units were valued at $15.00 per share, which was
the Companys closing stock price on the grant date.
In March 2008, the Company issued an aggregate 156,740 LTIP units, of which 20%, or 31,347,
vested upon issuance. The remaining 80% will vest if, and when, the Company achieves certain
performance standards as provided in the awards. The one time award was granted in recognition of
the role played by certain employees in guiding the Company through the Merger. The LTIP units
were valued at $15.72 per unit, which was the Companys closing stock price on the grant date. The
Company recorded compensation expense of $0.5 million in March 2008 related to the 20% of the grant
that vested.
In May 2008, Mr. Cogdell, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company elected to
forego his Annual Salary (as defined in Mr. Cogdells employment agreement) (the Foregone Salary)
as of the partial fiscal year beginning April 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, and continuing for
each of the Companys fiscal years during which Mr. Cogdell is employed by the Company. In lieu of
receiving his Annual Salary, Mr. Cogdell shall be awarded LTIP units in the Operating Partnership,
under the Companys 2005 equity incentive plan, as follows: (1) for the period from April 1, 2008
through December 31, 2008 (the 2008 Period), Mr. Cogdell shall be awarded a number of LTIP units
equal to (A) the Foregone Salary for the 2008 Period divided by (B) $17.62, being the closing price
of the Companys common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on May 28, 2008, and (2) for each of
the Companys fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2009 during which Mr. Cogdell is employed by the
Company on a full time basis, Mr. Cogdell shall be awarded a number of LTIP units equal to (A) the
Foregone Salary for such fiscal year divided by (B) the closing price of the Companys common stock
on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31 of such fiscal year (or, to the extent that December
31 is not a trading day, the immediately preceding trading day). One-third of the LTIP units
awarded to Mr. Cogdell in respect of the 2008 Period vested immediately, one-third vested on July
1, 2008, and one-third shall vest on October 1, 2008. The LTIP units awarded to Mr. Cogdell in
respect of each of the Companys fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2009 shall vest ratably on
the first day of each fiscal quarter. Any LTIP units that remain unvested upon the termination of
Mr. Cogdells employment with the Company shall be forfeited.
In September 2008, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,153 LTIP units, all of which vested
upon issuance, to certain employees based on specific performance goals. The LTIP units were
valued at $15.72 per unit, which was the Companys closing stock price on the grant date. The
Company recorded compensation expense of less than $0.1 million in September 2008 related to the
grant.
13. Related Party Transactions
The Fork Farm, a working farm owned by the Companys Chairman, periodically hosts events on
behalf of the Company. Charges of approximately $6,000 and $14,600, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are reflected in Selling, general, and administrative
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company has certain design-build contracts for the construction of medical facilities with
certain entities in which Mr. Lubar has an indirect ownership interest and serves as an officer.
The total contract amount is $30.7 million and construction was in process at the time of the
Erdman transaction. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized
$5.4 and $11.6 million, respectively, of contract revenue and as of September 30, 2008, had
accounts receivable of $1.5 million and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts of $2.1 million.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words
believes, anticipates, projects, should, estimates, expects, and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements with the meaning of that term in Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and in Section 21F of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may differ materially due to uncertainties
including:
|
|
|
the Companys business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to integrate Erdman; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to obtain future financing arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
estimates relating to the Companys future distributions; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys understanding of the Companys competition; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to renew the Companys ground leases; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the reimbursement available to the Companys tenants by government or private
payors; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys tenants ability to make rent payments; |
|
|
|
|
defaults by tenants; |
|
|
|
|
market trends; and |
|
|
|
|
projected capital expenditures. |
Forward-looking statements are based on estimates as of the date of this report. The Company
disclaims any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking
statements reflecting new estimates, events or circumstances after the date of this report.
Overview
The Company is a fully-integrated, self-administered, and self-managed REIT that invests in
specialty office buildings for the medical profession, including medical offices and ambulatory
surgery and diagnostic centers. The Company focuses on the ownership, development, redevelopment,
acquisition, and management of strategically located medical office buildings and other healthcare
related facilities in the United States of America. The Company has been built around
understanding and addressing the specialized real estate needs of the healthcare industry.
On March 10, 2008, the Company merged with MEA, which wholly owns Erdman. Erdman is a
market-leading provider of design-build healthcare facilities throughout the United States of
America. Erdmans service offerings include advance planning, architecture, engineering, and
construction. Combined, the Company is a fully integrated healthcare facilities solutions company
providing services from conceptual planning to long-term property management.
25
|
|
|
|
|
Core Capabilities
Erdman
Advance Planning
Design
Construction
|
|
|
|
Core Capabilities
Cogdell Spencer
Ownership
Development
Acquisitions
Property Management |
The Company is building a national portfolio of healthcare properties located on hospital
campuses. Since the Companys initial public offering in 2005, the Company has acquired properties
in five new states and multiple new markets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Company acquired two off-market acquisitions that were a result of strong relationships with
existing clients. Client relationships and advance planning services provided by Erdman also give
the Company the ability to be included in the initial project discussions that can lead to
ownership and investment in healthcare properties.
The Companys development team has completed four projects since the Companys initial public
offering in 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company broke ground on the St. Lukes
Riverside Outpatient Campus project, which is a $100 million, 400,000 square foot, four building
project including two medical office buildings. The Company will retain ownership in the two
medical office buildings, which are valued between $35 and $40 million.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Company formed a joint venture with Northwestern Mutual.
The joint venture, named Cogdell Spencer Medical Partners LLC, expects to acquire up to
approximately $350.0 million of medical office buildings and other healthcare facilities
nationwide, predominantly associated with not-for-profit healthcare systems and large
physician-owned clinics. The Company will contribute 20% of the equity capital to fund future
acquisitions in this joint venture. The joint venture will be the Companys exclusive vehicle for
cash acquisitions.
On September 2, 2008, the Company announced the first synergy project since the closing of the
Merger with Erdman. The project will include design/build (architectural, engineering, and
construction), development, and property management services. The $22.4 million project is a
75,985 square foot medical office building and outpatient treatment center located in Pensacola,
Florida. The project is 100% pre-leased and scheduled for completion in December 2009. The
Company expects to own approximately 40% of the building through a joint venture with the physician
tenants of the building. In connection with this project, the Company obtained financing in an
amount up to $16.8 million and for a total term of ten years, inclusive of an 18-month construction
period. The loan provides for payments of interest-only during the construction period at a rate
of one-month LIBOR plus 1.50%. After the construction period, the loan converts to an amortizing
loan with monthly payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule. The Company has entered into
a forward starting interest rate swap agreement that effectively fixes the interest rate at 6.21%
after the construction period through maturity. The loan matures September 2018.
Since its founding in 1951, Erdman has designed, engineered, or built over 5,000 healthcare
facilities, which support more than 50,000 physicians. In 2007, Erdman achieved $324 million in
revenue and increased its backlog. Erdman was ranked as the number one healthcare design-build
firm for 2007 by Modern Healthcares 2008 Construction and Design Survey.
26
The Companys property management team has a proactive, customer-focused service approach that
leads to faster response times and greater resources to serve tenants. The Companys management
believes that a strong internal property management capability is a vital component of the
Companys business, both for the properties that the Company owns and for those that the Company
manages. In 2008, the Company will continue the Celebrating 25 Years Campaign, which recognizes
the long-term relationships between the Company and its healthcare system clients and partners.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company owned and/or managed 116 medical office buildings
(MOBs) and healthcare related facilities, serving 27 hospital systems in 13 states. The
Companys portfolio consists of:
|
|
|
62 properties, comprised of 3.3 million net rentable square feet, each
of which the Company wholly-owns or is a consolidated real estate
partnership; |
|
|
|
|
Three properties, comprised of 0.2 million net rentable square feet,
in which the Company owns a minority interest; and |
|
|
|
|
51 properties, comprised of 2.2 million net rentable square feet, that
the Company manages for third parties. |
As of September 30, 2008, of the Companys wholly-owned properties, 81% were located on
hospital campuses and an additional 7% were located off-campus, but were hospital anchored. The
Company believes that its on-campus and hospital anchored assets occupy a premier franchise
location in relation to local hospitals, providing the Companys properties with a distinct
competitive advantage over alternative medical office space in an area. As of September 30, 2008,
the Companys in-service, consolidated wholly-owned and joint venture properties were approximately
91.9% occupied, with a weighted average remaining lease term of approximately 4.8 years.
Factors Which May Influence Future Results of Operations
The Company derives a significant portion of its revenues from two sources: 1) rents received
from tenants under existing leases in medical office buildings and other healthcare related
facilities, and 2) design-build services for healthcare customers. The Company derives a lesser
portion of its revenues from fees that are paid for managing and developing medical office
buildings and other healthcare related facilities for third parties.
Generally, the Companys revenues and expenses have remained consistent except for growth due
to property and business acquisitions and timing of development fee earnings. Erdmans financial
results can be affected by weather at the construction sites, amount and timing of capital spending
by healthcare systems and providers, and the demand for Erdmans services in the healthcare
facilities market. Fluctuations in the commercial property credit markets and changes in variable
interest rates could influence the Companys borrowing costs.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in conformity with GAAP. All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation and combination.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses in the reporting period.
The Companys actual results may differ from these estimates. Management has provided a summary of
the Companys significant accounting policies in Note 2 to the Companys consolidated financial
statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Critical accounting policies are those judged to involve accounting estimates or assumptions that
may be material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for uncertain
matters or susceptibility of such matters to change. Other companies in similar businesses may
utilize different estimation policies and methodologies, which may impact the comparability of the
Companys results of operations and financial condition to those companies.
27
Acquisition of Real Estate
The price that the Company pays to acquire a property is impacted by many factors, including
the condition of the buildings and improvements, the occupancy of the building, the existence of
above and below market tenant leases, the creditworthiness of the tenants, favorable or unfavorable
financing, above or below market ground leases and numerous other factors. Accordingly, the Company
is required to make subjective assessments to allocate the purchase price paid to acquire
investments in real estate among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the Companys
estimate of the fair values of such assets and liabilities. This includes determining the value of
the buildings and improvements, land, any ground leases, tenant improvements, in-place tenant
leases, tenant relationships, the value (or negative value) of above (or below) market leases and
any debt assumed from the seller or loans made by the seller to the Company. Each of these
estimates requires significant judgment and some of the estimates involve complex calculations. The
Companys calculation methodology is summarized in Note 2 to the Companys audited consolidated
financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. These allocation assessments have a direct impact on the Companys results of operations
because if the Company were to allocate more value to land there would be no depreciation with
respect to such amount or if the Company were to allocate more value to the buildings as opposed to
allocating to the value of tenant leases, this amount would be recognized as an expense over a much
longer period of time, since the amounts allocated to buildings are depreciated over the estimated
lives of the buildings whereas amounts allocated to tenant leases are amortized over the terms of
the leases. Additionally, the amortization of value (or negative value) assigned to above (or
below) market rate leases is recorded as an adjustment to rental revenue as compared to
amortization of the value of in-place leases and tenant relationships, which is included in
depreciation and amortization in the Companys consolidated and combined statements of operations.
Useful Lives of Assets
The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of the Companys
properties and intangible assets for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation and
amortization to record on an annual basis with respect to the Companys assets. These assessments
have a direct impact on the Companys net income (loss) because if the Company were to shorten the
expected useful lives, then the Company would depreciate or amortize such assets over fewer years,
resulting in more depreciation or amortization expense on an annual basis.
Asset Impairment Valuation
The Company reviews the carrying value of its properties, goodwill, and intangible assets when
circumstances, such as adverse market conditions, indicate a potential impairment may exist. The
Company bases its review on an estimate of the future cash flows (excluding interest charges)
expected to result from the real estate or business investments use and eventual disposition. The
Company considers factors such as future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the
effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If the Companys evaluation indicates
that it may be unable to recover the carrying value of an investment, an impairment loss is
recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. These
losses have a direct impact on the Companys net income because recording an impairment loss
results in an immediate negative adjustment to operating results. The evaluation of anticipated
cash flows is highly subjective and is based in part on assumptions regarding future sales,
backlog, occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual
results in future periods. Since cash flows on properties considered to be long-lived assets to be
held and used are considered on an undiscounted basis to determine whether an asset has been
impaired, the Companys strategy of holding properties over the long-term directly decreases the
likelihood of recording an impairment loss for properties. If the Companys strategy changes or
market conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss may be recognized and
such loss could be material. If the Company determines that impairment has occurred, the affected
assets must be reduced to their fair value. No such impairment losses have been recognized to date.
The Company estimates the fair value of rental properties utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis
that includes projections of future revenues, expenses and capital improvement costs, similar to
the income approach that is commonly utilized by appraisers. The Company reviews the value of
Goodwill using an income approach on an annual basis and when circumstances indicate a potential
impairment may exist.
28
Revenue Recognition
Rental income related to non-cancelable operating leases is recognized using the straight line
method over the terms of the tenant leases. Deferred rents included in the Companys consolidated
balance sheets represent the aggregate excess of rental revenue recognized on a straight line basis
over the rental revenue that would be recognized under the cash flow received, based on the terms
of the leases. The Companys leases generally contain provisions under which the tenants reimburse
the Company for all property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred by the Company. Such
reimbursements are recognized in the period that the expenses are incurred. Lease termination fees
are recognized when the related leases are canceled and the Company has no continuing obligation to
provide services to such former tenants. As discussed above, the Company recognizes amortization of
the value of acquired above or below market tenant leases as a reduction of rental income in the
case of above market leases or an increase to rental revenue in the case of below market leases.
For design-build contracts, the Company recognizes revenue under the percentage of completion
method. Due to the volume, varying complexity, and other factors related to the Companys
design-build contracts, the estimates required to determine percentage of completion are complex
and use subjective judgments. Changes in labor costs and material inputs can have a significant
impact on the percentage of completion calculations. The Company and Erdman have a long history of
developing reasonable and dependable estimates related to design-build contracts with clear
requirements and rights of the parties to the contracts. As long-term design-build projects extend
over one or more years, revisions in cost and estimate earnings during the course of the work are
reflected in the accounting period in which the facts which require the revision become known. At
the time a loss on a design-build project becomes known, the entire amount of the estimated
ultimate loss is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company receives fees for property management and development and consulting services from
time to time from third parties which are reflected as fee revenue. Management fees are generally
based on a percentage of revenues for the month as defined in the related property management
agreements. Revenue from development and consulting agreements is recognized as earned per the
agreements. Due to the amount of control retained by the Company, most joint venture
developments will be consolidated; therefore, those development fees will be eliminated in
consolidation. However, the Cogdell Spencer Medical Partners, LLC partnership is an unconsolidated
entity.
Other income shown in the statement of operations, generally includes interest income,
primarily from the amortization of unearned income on a sales-type capital lease recognized in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 (SFAS 13), and other income
incidental to the Companys operations and is recognized when earned.
The Company must make subjective estimates as to when the Companys revenue is earned and the
collectibility of the Companys accounts receivable related to design-build contracts and other
sales, minimum rent, deferred rent, expense reimbursements, lease termination fees and other
income. The Company specifically analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debts, tenant and
customer concentrations, tenant and customer creditworthiness, and current economic trends when
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for bad debts. These estimates have a direct impact on the
Companys net income because a higher bad debt allowance would result in lower net income, and
recognizing rental revenue as earned in one period versus another would result in higher or lower
net income for a particular period.
REIT Qualification Requirements
The Company is subject to a number of operational and organizational requirements to qualify
and then maintain qualification as a REIT. If the Company does not qualify as a REIT, its income
would become subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate rates that
would be substantial and the Company cannot re-elect to qualify as a REIT for five years. The
resulting adverse effects on the Companys results of operations, liquidity and amounts
distributable to stockholders would be material.
29
Changes in Financial Condition
On January 23, 2008, the Company issued 3,448,278 shares of common stock to certain
institutional investors at a price of $15.95 per share resulting in net proceeds to the Company of
approximately $53.8 million. On September
10, 2008, the Company issued 2,160,000 shares of common stock in a public offering at a price
of $18.50 per share resulting in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $37.6 million. The
net proceeds of both offerings were used to reduce outstanding principal on the Companys Credit
Facility and for working capital purposes. For more information on the Credit Facility, see
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
As discussed in Note 3 and Note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the
Company completed the Merger with Erdman, amended the Credit Facility, and obtained $100.0 million
in term debt.
Results of Operations
The Companys loss from operations is generated primarily from operations of its properties
and design-build services. The changes in operating results from period to period reflect changes
in existing property performance, changes in the number of properties due to development,
acquisition, or disposition of properties, and the operating results of the design-build segment.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, there are three months and seven
months, respectively, of operating activity related to the Erdman subsidiary.
Business Segments
The Company has two identified reportable segments: (1) property operations and (2)
design-build and development. The Company defines business segments by their distinct customer
base and service provided. Each segment operates under a separate management group and produces
discrete financial information, which is reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make
resource allocation decisions and assess performance. See Note 5 of the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
Property Summary
The following is an activity summary of the Companys portfolio of wholly-owned and
consolidated partnership properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
and the year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Properties at beginning of the period |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
In-service completed developments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Lease-up completed development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties at end of the period |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
Properties at January 1 |
|
|
51 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
5 |
|
In-service completed developments |
|
|
2 |
|
Lease-up completed development |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties at December 31 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above tables include East Jefferson Medical Specialty Building, which is accounted for as
a sales-type capital lease. A property is considered in-service upon the earlier of (1) lease-up
and substantial completion of tenant improvements, or (2) one year after cessation of major
construction. For portfolio and operational data, a single in-service date is used. For GAAP
reporting, a property is placed into service in stages as construction is completed and the
property and tenant space is available for its intended use.
30
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
FFOM
FFOM increased $3.2 million, or 63.5%, from $5.0 million in the three months ended September
30, 2007 to $8.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in FFOM is due
to: (1) $8.9 million increase in FFOM for the design-build and development segment, of which the
majority of the segments increase is due to the inclusion of Erdmans operating activity for the
three months ended September 30, 2008; and (2) $1.2 million increase in FFOM from property
acquisitions and completed developments. These increases in FFOM were offset by a $2.6 million
increase in interest expense due to increased outstanding debt balances, $2.4 million income tax
expense primarily related to taxable income at the Erdman subsidiary, a $0.9 million minority
interest charge, and a $1.3 million increase in corporate general and administrative expenses
primarily due to increased incentive compensation expense and professional fees. The $0.9 minority
interest charge is due to a consolidated real estate partnerships negative partners equity that
resulted from a debt refinance proceeds cash distribution to the 65.5% owner and subsequent cash
distributions to the 65.5% owner and GAAP net losses. In accordance with GAAP, the consolidating
partner is required to record a charge to minority interest for distributions and net losses when
the partnerships partners equity is negative.
See Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for business segment
information and managements use of FFO and FFOM to evaluate operating performance. The following
table presents the reconciliation of FFO and FFOM to net loss, which is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to FFO and FFOM, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands, except per share and OP unit amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,086 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,602 |
) |
Plus minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
Plus real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,494 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from Operations (FFO) |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
4,963 |
|
Plus amortization of intangibles related to purchase
accounting, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from Operations Modified (FFOM) |
|
$ |
8,159 |
|
|
$ |
4,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Rental revenue increased $3.2 million, or 19.7%, from $16.4 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 to $19.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Rental revenue
from acquisition properties and completed developments increased $3.0 million. Same-property
revenue increased $0.3 million, or 1.7%, primarily due to general increases in rent related to
Consumer Price Index (CPI) escalation clauses and increased rent from reimbursable expenses,
offset by a reduction in occupancy.
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales revenue is due to the inclusion of Erdmans
operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Development management and other income increased $0.6 million due to the timing of
development fee income from projects.
Expenses
Property
operating and management expenses increased $1.6 million, or
23.1%, from $6.8 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 to $8.4 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. Property
operating and management expenses related to acquisition properties and completed developments
increased $1.2 million. Same-property property operating and
management expenses increased $0.4
million, or 6.7%, primarily due to reimbursable expenses such as property taxes, insurance, and
utilities.
31
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales revenue is due to the inclusion
of Erdmans operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $6.1 million, or 396.0%. An increase
of $4.8 million is due to the inclusion of Erdmans operating results for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company had increased accrued
incentive based compensation expenses of $0.7 million and increased legal and consulting
professional fees of $.05 million.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.6 million, or 63.2%. There was an increase
of $4.0 million related to the amortization of Erdman intangible assets and an increase of $0.3
million related to depreciation of Erdman fixed assets. Depreciation and amortization related to
acquisition properties and completed developments increased $0.8 million. Same-property
depreciation and amortization decreased $0.5 million.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased $2.6 million, or 64.4%. The increase is due to an increase in
outstanding debt balances offset by a lower weighted average interest rate. The weighted average
interest rate at September 30, 2008 was 6.0% compared to 6.3% at September 30, 2007.
Income tax (expense) benefit
The income tax (expense) benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was due to a
taxable net income computed in accordance with SFAS 109 for the Erdman TRS due to the amortization
of intangible assets. The income tax expense in 2007 was due to taxable net income computed in
accordance with SFAS 109 for the CSA, LLC TRS, which was a result of property management
activities.
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
FFOM
FFOM increased $8.1 million, or 61.0%, from $13.2 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2007 to $21.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in FFOM is due
to: (1) $15.4 million increase in FFOM for the design-build and development segment, of which the
majority of the segments increase is due to the inclusion of Erdmans operating activity for seven
of the nine months ended September 30, 2008; and (2) $4.5 million increase in FFOM from property
acquisitions and completed developments. These increases in FFOM were offset by a $7.4 million
increase in interest expense due to increased outstanding debt balances, $3.6 million in income tax
expense primarily related to taxable income at the Erdman subsidiary, a $0.9 million minority
interest charge, and a $2.9 million increase in corporate general and administrative expenses
primarily due to $1.7 million in increased accrued incentive compensation and equity compensation
expense associated with LTIP units granted in connection with the Merger, $0.4 million in severance
compensation, and a $0.8 million increase in legal and consulting professional fees. The $0.9
minority interest charge is due to a consolidated real estate partnerships negative partners
equity that resulted from a debt refinance proceeds cash distribution to the 65.5% owner and
subsequent cash distributions to the 65.5% owner and GAAP net losses. In accordance with GAAP, the
consolidating partner is required to record a charge to minority interest for distributions
and net losses when the partnerships partners equity is negative.
See Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for business segment
information and managements use of FFO and FFOM to evaluate operating performance. The following
table presents the reconciliation of FFO and FFOM to net loss, which is the most directly
comparable GAAP measure to FFO and FFOM, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands, except per share and OP Unit amounts):
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,731 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,005 |
) |
Plus minority interests in operating partnership |
|
|
(2,480 |
) |
|
|
(2,226 |
) |
Plus real estate related depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22,896 |
|
|
|
20,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from Operations (FFO) |
|
|
15,685 |
|
|
|
13,164 |
|
Plus amortization of intangibles related to purchase
accounting, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
5,594 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from Operations Modified (FFOM) |
|
$ |
21,279 |
|
|
$ |
13,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Rental revenue increased $12.3 million, or 27.1%, from $45.3 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 to $57.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Rental revenue
from acquisition properties and completed developments increased
$11.2 million, or 538.4%, from $2.1
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to $13.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. Same-property revenue increased
$1.1 million, or 2.6%, primarily due to
general increases in rent related to CPI escalation clauses and increased rent from reimbursable
expenses, offset by a reduction in occupancy.
Design-Build contract revenue and other sales revenue is due to the seven month inclusion of
Erdmans operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Development management and other income decreased $0.5 million due to the timing of
development fee income from projects.
Expenses
Property
operating and management expenses increased $4.6 million, or
24.7%, from $18.8 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 to $23.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. Property
operating and management expenses related to acquisition properties and completed developments
increased $4.1 million. Same-property property operating and
management expenses increased $0.5 million, or 3.0%, primarily due to reimbursable expenses such as property taxes, insurance, and
utilities.
Costs related to design-build contract revenue and other sales revenue is due to the seven
month inclusion of Erdmans operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $15.1 million, or 285.1%. An increase
of $12.2 million is due to the inclusion of Erdmans operating results for seven of the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company had
increased expenses of $2.9 million in corporate general and administrative expenses primarily due
to $1.7 million in increased accrued incentive compensation and equity compensation expense
associated with LTIP units granted in connection with the Merger, $0.4 million in severance
compensation, and a $0.8 million increase in legal and consulting professional fees
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $12.6 million, or 61.0%. There was an
increase of $9.0 million related to the amortization of Erdman intangible assets and an increase of
$1.0 million related to the depreciation of Erdman fixed assets. Depreciation and amortization
related to acquisition properties and completed developments
increased $4.0 million. Same-property
depreciation and amortization decreased $1.4 million.
Interest expense
Interest expense increased $7.4 million, or 65.1%. The increase is due to an increase in
outstanding debt balances offset by a lower weighted average interest rate. The weighted average
interest rate at September 30, 2008 was 6.0% compared to 6.3% at September 30, 2007.
33
Income tax (expense) benefit
The income tax benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was due to a taxable net
income computed in accordance with SFAS 109 for the Erdman TRS due to the amortization of
intangible assets. The income tax expense in 2007 was due to taxable net income computed in
accordance with SFAS 109 for the CSA, LLC TRS, which was a result of development fees, a
non-recurring brokerage commission, and property management activities.
Cash Flows
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007
Cash provided by operating activities was $24.6 million and $17.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating
activities was $7.1 million, which resulted from a $7.4 million net decrease due to changes in
operating assets and liabilities offset by a $14.4 million increase in earnings before non-cash
adjustments. The $7.4 million net decrease due to changes in operating assets and liabilities was
a result of: 1) $9.6 million paid to Erdman personnel in March 2008 for fiscal year 2007 annual
bonuses, profit sharing, and 401(k) employer matching, 2) $9.5 million decrease in billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts; offset by $5.4 million in cash
provided due to various changes in operating assets, accrued expenses, accrued incentive
compensation, and prepaid rent accounts. The Company accrued the $9.6 million for the Erdman
fiscal year 2007 performance bonus payments as part of the Erdman purchase price allocation and the
amount was included in the Erdman Merger working capital calculation.
Cash used in investing activities was $187.1 million and $96.3 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Company paid cash, net of cash assumed, of $145.0 million (of which $14.6 million related to an
escrowed amount that is included in the restricted cash increase) related to the Erdman business
acquisition as well as $38.6 million related to property acquisitions and capital expenditures. In
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Companys investment in real estate properties was
related to development projects and the acquisition of three properties.
Cash provided by financing activities was $169.6 million and $80.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the
Company received $91.3 million, net of costs, from the issuance of common stock and the proceeds
were used to reduce outstanding amounts payable on the Credit Facility. Also, during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, the Company received proceeds of $100.0 million from the Term Loan
and $110.5 million from the Credit Facility, which were primarily used to fund the Erdman
transaction and property acquisitions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company
received proceeds of $78.4 million, net of costs, related to the issuance of common stock and the
proceeds were used to reduce outstanding amounts payable on the Credit Facility.
Construction in Progress
Construction in progress at September 30, 2008, consisted of the St. Lukes Riverside MOBs and
the Woodlands Center project. The following is a summary of the construction in progress balance
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
Net Rentable |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Estimated
Total |
|
Property |
|
Location |
|
Completion Date |
|
Square Feet |
|
|
to Date |
|
|
Investment |
|
St. Lukes Riverside MOB |
|
Bethlehem, PA |
|
2nd Half 2010 |
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
38,900 |
|
The Woodlands Center |
|
Pensacola, FL |
|
December 2009 |
|
|
76,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
24,769 |
|
Land and pre-construction developments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,672 |
|
|
$ |
63,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had approximately $10.6 million available in cash and
cash equivalents. The Company is required to distribute at least 90% of the Companys net taxable
income, excluding net capital gains, to the Companys stockholders on an annual basis due to
qualification requirements as a REIT. Therefore, as a general matter, it is unlikely that the
Company will have any substantial cash balances that could be used to meet the Companys liquidity
needs. Instead, these needs must be met from cash generated from operations and external sources
of capital.
The Company has a $150.0 million secured revolving Credit Facility with the Lenders. The
Credit Facility is available to fund working capital and for other general corporate purposes; to
finance acquisition and development activity; and to refinance existing and future indebtedness.
The Credit Facility permits the Company to borrow up to $150.0 million of revolving loans, with
sub-limits of $25.0 million for swingline loans and $25.0 million for letters of credit.
The Credit Facility shall terminate and all amounts outstanding thereunder shall be due and
payable in full three years from March 10, 2008. The Credit Facility provides for a one-year
extension at the Companys option conditioned upon the Lenders being satisfied with the Company and
its subsidiaries financial condition and liquidity, and taking into consideration any payment,
extension or refinancing of the Term Loan. The Credit Facility also allows for up to $100.0 million
of increased availability (to a total aggregate available amount of $250.0 million), at the
Companys option but subject to each Lenders option to increase its commitment. The interest rate
on loans under the Credit Facility equals, at the Companys election, either (1) LIBOR (3.93% as of
September 30, 2008) plus a margin of between 95 to 140 basis points based on the Companys total
leverage ratio or (2) the higher of the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points or Bank of America,
N.A.s prime rate (5.00% as of September 30, 2008).
The Credit Facility contains customary terms and conditions for credit facilities of this
type, including, but not limited to: (1) affirmative covenants relating to the Companys corporate
structure and ownership, maintenance of insurance, compliance with environmental laws and
preparation of environmental reports, maintenance of the
34
Companys REIT qualification and listing
on the New York Stock Exchange, (2) negative covenants relating to restrictions on liens,
indebtedness, certain investments (including loans and certain advances), mergers and other
fundamental changes, sales and other dispositions of property or assets and transactions with
affiliates, and (3) financial covenants to be met by the Company at all times including a maximum
total leverage ratio (70%), maximum real estate leverage ratio (70%), minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio (1.50 to 1.00), maximum total debt to real estate value ratio (90%) and minimum consolidated
tangible net worth ($45 million plus 85% of the net proceeds of equity issuances issued after the
closing date).
As of September 30, 2008, there was $51.9 million available under the Credit Facility. There
was $90.0 million outstanding at September 30, 2008 and $8.1 million of availability was restricted
related to outstanding letters of credit.
The Company, through its Erdman TRS, has $100.0 million outstanding under a $100.0 million
Term Loan which financed the cash portion of the Merger. Keybanc Capital Markets is acting as sole
lead arranger and sole book manager of the Term Loan. Bank of America, N.A. is acting as
syndication agent. Branch Banking and Trust Company and Wachovia Bank, N.A. are acting as
co-documentation agents. KeyBank National Association, Bank of America, N.A., Branch Banking and
Trust Company, Wachovia Bank, National Association, M&I Marshall and Ilsley Bank, and Citicorp
North America, Inc. are lenders thereunder. The Term Loan is secured by the stock and certain
accounts receivables of Erdman and is guaranteed by the Company. The Term Loan matures on the third
anniversary of its closing and is subject to a one-time right to a one-year extension at the
Companys option (with the payment of an extension fee). The Term Loan contains customary covenants
including, but not limited to, (1) affirmative covenants relating to the Companys corporate
structure and ownership, maintenance of insurance, compliance with environmental laws and
preparation of environmental reports, maintenance of the
Companys REIT qualification and listing on the
New York Stock Exchange, (2) negative covenants relating to restrictions on liens, indebtedness,
certain investments (including loans and certain advances), mergers and other fundamental changes,
sales and other dispositions of property or assets and transactions with affiliates, and (3)
financial covenants to be met by the Company at all times under the guaranty including a maximum
total leverage ratio (70%), maximum real estate leverage ratio (70%), minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio (1.50 to 1.00), maximum total debt to real estate value ratio (90%) and minimum consolidated
tangible net worth ($45 million plus 85% of the net proceeds of equity issuances), as well as being
cross defaulted to the Companys Credit Facility. In addition, there are financial covenants
relating only to Erdman. The interest rate on loans under the Term Loan equals, at the Companys
election, either (1) LIBOR (3.93% as of September 30, 2008) plus a margin of between 300 to 350
basis points based on certain Erdman performance ratios or (2) (i) the higher of the federal funds
rate plus 50 basis points or KeyBank National Associations prime rate (ii) plus a margin of
between 300 to 350 basis points based on certain Erdman performance ratios (5.00% as of September
30, 2008).
The Company believes that it will have sufficient capital resources as a result of operations
and the borrowings in place to fund ongoing operations.
On September 11, 2008, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had declared a
quarterly distribution of $0.35 per share or OP Unit that was paid on October 20, 2008 to
stockholders and holders of OP
Units of record on September 26, 2008. The distribution covered the third quarter of 2008 and
totaled $9.4 million. The dividend and distribution were equivalent to an annual rate of $1.40
per share and OP unit.
The Company funds the dividends and distributions through a combination of funds from
operations and its Credit Facility. The Company uses borrowings available under its Credit
Facility to fund dividend and distribution payments when the timing of the Companys cash flows
available from operations is insufficient to meet distribution requirements.
Long-Term Liquidity Needs
The Companys principal long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of new property
development, property acquisitions, principal payments under various mortgages and other credit
facilities and non-recurring capital expenditures. The Company does not expect that its net cash
provided by operations will be sufficient to meet all of these long-term liquidity needs. Instead,
the Company expects to finance new property developments through modest cash equity capital
contributed by the Company together with construction loan proceeds, as well as through
35
cash equity
investments by its tenants. The Company expects to fund property acquisitions through a combination
of borrowings under its Credit Facility and traditional secured mortgage financing. In addition,
the Company expects to use OP Units issued by the Operating Partnership to acquire properties from
existing owners seeking a tax deferred transaction. Although capital markets continued to remain
tight during 2008, the Company continues to expect to meet long-term liquidity requirements through
net cash provided by operations and through additional equity and debt financings, including loans
from banks, institutional investors or other lenders, bridge loans, letters of credit, and other
lending arrangements, most of which will be secured by mortgages. The Company may also issue
unsecured debt in the future. The Company does not, in general, expect to meet its long-term
liquidity needs through dispositions of its properties. In the event that the Company were to sell
any of its properties in the future, depending on which property were to be sold, the Company may
need to structure the sale or disposition as a tax deferred transaction which would require the
reinvestment of the proceeds from such transaction in another property or, however, the proceeds
that would be available to the Company from such sales may be reduced by amounts that the Company
may owe under the tax protection agreements entered into in connection with the Companys formation
transactions and certain property acquisitions. In addition, the Companys ability to sell certain
of its assets could be adversely affected by the general illiquidity of real estate assets and
certain additional factors particular to the Companys portfolio such as the specialized nature of
its target property type, property use restrictions and the need to obtain consents or waivers of
rights of first refusal or rights of first offers from ground lessors in the case of sales of its
properties that are subject to ground leases.
The Company intends to repay indebtedness incurred under its Credit Facility from time to
time, for acquisitions or otherwise, out of cash flow from operations and from the proceeds of
additional debt or equity issuances. In the future, the Company may seek to increase the amount of
the Credit Facility, negotiate additional credit facilities or issue corporate debt instruments.
Any indebtedness incurred or issued by the Company may be secured or unsecured, short-, medium- or
long-term, fixed or variable interest rate and may be subject to other terms and conditions the
Company deems acceptable. The Company intends to refinance at maturity the mortgage notes payable
that have balloon payments at maturity.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations as of September 30, 2008,
including the maturities and scheduled principal repayments and the commitments due in connection
with the Companys ground leases and operating leases for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt principal
payments and maturities (1) |
|
$ |
13,466 |
|
|
$ |
47,560 |
|
|
$ |
31,109 |
|
|
$ |
212,386 |
|
|
$ |
11,145 |
|
|
$ |
108,596 |
|
|
$ |
424,262 |
|
Standby letters of credit (2) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,053 |
|
Interest payments (3) |
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
24,371 |
|
|
|
21,447 |
|
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
19,742 |
|
|
|
88,815 |
|
Purchase commitments (4) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
Ground and air rights leases (5) |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
9,946 |
|
|
|
11,282 |
|
Operating leases (6) |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
27,776 |
|
|
|
44,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,607 |
|
|
$ |
85,232 |
|
|
$ |
56,601 |
|
|
$ |
225,953 |
|
|
$ |
21,393 |
|
|
$ |
166,060 |
|
|
$ |
576,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes notes payable under the Companys Credit Facility. |
|
(2) |
|
As collateral for performance, the Company is contingently liable under standby
letters of credit, which also reduces the availability under the Credit Facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes one-month LIBOR of 3.93% and Prime Rate of 5.00%, which were the rates as of
September 30, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
These purchase commitments are related to the Companys development projects that
are currently under construction. |
|
(5) |
|
Substantially all of the ground and air rights leases effectively limit our control
over various aspects of the operation of the applicable property, restrict our ability to
transfer the property and allow the lessor the right of first refusal to purchase the building
and improvements. All of the ground leases provide for the property to revert to the lessor
for no consideration upon the expiration or earlier termination of the ground or air rights
lease. |
|
(6) |
|
Payments under operating lease agreements relate to various of our properties
equipment and office space leases. The future minimum lease commitments under these leases are
as indicated. |
36
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company may guarantee debt in connection with certain of its development activities,
including joint ventures, from time to time. As of September 30, 2008, the Company did not have
any such guarantees or other off-balance sheet arrangements outstanding.
Real Estate Taxes
The Companys leases generally require the tenants to be responsible for all real estate
taxes.
Inflation
The Companys leases at wholly-owned and consolidated partnership properties generally provide
for either indexed escalators, based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures, or to a lesser
extent fixed increases in base rents. The leases also contain provisions under which the tenants
reimburse the Company for a portion of property operating expenses and real estate taxes. The
Companys property management and related services provided to third parties typically provide for
fees based on a percentage of revenues for the month as defined in the related property management
agreements. The revenues collected from leases are generally structured as described above, with
year over year increases. The Company also pays certain payroll and related costs related to the
operations of third party properties that are managed by the Company. Under terms of the related
management agreements, these costs are reimbursed by the third party property owners. The Company
believes that inflationary increases in expenses will be offset, in part, by the contractual rent
increases and tenant expense reimbursements described above.
Seasonality
The Design-Build and Development business segment can be subject to seasonality due to weather
conditions at construction sites. In addition, construction starts and contract signings can be
impacted by the timing of budget cycles at healthcare systems and providers.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is intended to
provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of derivative instruments and
hedging activities by having the
Company disclose: (1) how and why the Company uses derivative instruments; (2) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related
interpretations; and (3) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the Companys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application encouraged. SFAS 161 encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures
for earlier periods at initial adoption. The Company has not adopted SFAS 161 and is in the process
of evaluating the impact of SFAS 161 on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Financial Statement Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 states that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards
that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends participate in undistributed earnings with common
shareholders and should be included in basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. FSP No.
EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 may have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets. FSP No. FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The intent of this FSP is to improve
the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and
other GAAP. FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
37
those
fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact FSP No. FAS
142-3 may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States. SFAS 162 will be
effective 60 days after the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOBs) amendments to AU Section 411. The Company does not expect SFAS 162 to have an impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Companys future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are
dependent upon prevalent market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse
changes in market prices and interest rates. The Company uses some derivative financial instruments
to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to the Companys borrowings. The Company does not
use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enters into contracts with major
financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had $424.3 million of consolidated debt outstanding
(excluding any discounts or premiums related to assumed debt). Of the Companys total
consolidated debt, $102.8 million, or 24.2%, was variable rate debt that is not subject to variable
to fixed rate interest rate swap agreements. Of the Companys total indebtedness, $321.4 million,
or 75.8%, was subject to fixed interest rates, including variable rate debt that is subject to
variable to fixed rate swap agreements. The weighted average interest rate for fixed rate debt was
6.2% as of September 30, 2008.
If LIBOR were to increase by 10%, or 39 basis points based on September 30, 2008 one-month
LIBOR of 3.93%, the increase in interest expense on the Companys September 30, 2008 variable rate
debt would decrease future annual earnings and cash flows by approximately $0.4 million. Interest
rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the
Companys financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall
economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of that
magnitude, the Company may take actions to further mitigate the Companys exposure to the change.
However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible
effects, these analyses assume no changes in the Companys financial structure.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based on their evaluation
of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15
or Rule 15d-15, have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurances to the
timely collection, evaluation and disclosure of information relating to the Company that would
potentially be subject to disclosure under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, there was no change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the
Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in our periodic
reports.
38
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not involved in any material litigation nor, to the Companys knowledge, is any
material litigation pending or threatened against us, other than routine litigation arising out of
the ordinary course of business or which is expected to be covered by insurance and not expected to
harm the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
See the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, for risk factors. There have
been no significant changes to the Companys risk factors during the nine months ended September
30, 2008, other than those set forth in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Below is a summary of equity repurchases by month for the three months ended September 30,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Purchased as Part |
|
Value of Equity |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Price Paid |
|
of Publicly |
|
Securities that May |
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
Per Equity |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
For the Month of |
|
Purchased |
|
Security |
|
or Programs |
|
Under the Plan |
July 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
August 2008 |
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
|
18.61 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
September 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
$ |
18.61 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These figures only relate to repurchases of OP Units by the Operating Partnership. The Company
did not repurchase shares of Common Stock during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITIES HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On August 29, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved
certain compensation arrangements for the Companys executive officers for the year ending December
31, 2008. The compensation that the Companys named executive officers are eligible to receive for
the year ending December 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
Frank C. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer and President: (i) base
salary of $500,000; (ii) annual achievement bonus of up to $500,000,
based on certain corporate-level strategic benchmarks; and (iii)
annual incentive bonus of up to $250,000, based on certain funds from
operations modified (FFOM) growth benchmarks. Mr. Spencers annual
achievement bonus and annual incentive bonus for 2008, if any, is
payable in LTIP units. |
|
|
|
|
Charles M. Handy, Chief Financial Officer: (i) base salary of
$275,000; (ii) annual achievement bonus of up to $247,500, based on
certain corporate-level strategic benchmarks, individual
department-level goals and subjective evaluation by the Chief
Executive Officer; (iii) LTIP unit grants of up to $150,000, based on
certain corporate-level strategic benchmarks, individual
department-level goals and subjective evaluation by the Chief
Executive Officer; and (iv) development project LTIP unit grants equal
to 0.15% of the asset value of each of the Companys new completed and
owned development projects. |
|
|
|
|
Scott Ransom, President and Chief Executive Officer of Erdman Company:
(i) base salary of $315,000; (ii) annual bonus of up to $315,000,
based on certain performance goals and performance multipliers set by
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and recommended to the
Compensation Committee; (iii) LTIP unit grants of up to 16% of the
amount by which Erdmans EBITDA exceeds certain strategic benchmarks;
and (iv) development project LTIP unit grants equal to 0.5% of the
asset value of each of the Companys new completed and owned
development projects. |
The actual amount of bonuses and LTIP unit grants for each named executive officer set forth above
is subject to change in the Compensation Committees discretion.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adapted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COGDELL SPENCER INC.
Registrant
|
|
Date: November 10, 2008 |
/s/ Frank C. Spencer
|
|
|
Frank C. Spencer |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 10, 2008 |
/s/ Charles M. Handy
|
|
|
Charles M. Handy |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
40