Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 11, 2007
Registration
No. 333-146128
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
6021
|
|
62-1812853
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
The Commerce Center
211 Commerce Street
Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37201
(615) 744-3700
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number,
including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
M. Terry Turner
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
211 Commerce Street
Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37201
(615) 744-3700
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Gary L. Scott, Chairman
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
7651 Highway 70 South
Nashville, Tennessee 37221
|
|
Bob F. Thompson, Esq.
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
315 Deaderick Street, Suite 2700
Nashville, Tennessee 37238
|
|
Daniel W. Small, Esq.
One Burton Hills Boulevard, Suite 330
Nashville, Tennessee 37215
|
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the merger
described in this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act, or until the Registration Statement shall
become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange
Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may
determine.
The
information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is not
complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold
until the registration statement filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary joint proxy
statement/prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities,
and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
OCTOBER 10, 2007
MERGER
PROPOSAL YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
The boards of directors of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(Pinnacle) and
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
(Mid-America)
have adopted an agreement to merge our two companies.
If the merger is completed,
Mid-America
shareholders will receive, for each share of
Mid-America
common stock owned by such shareholders, 0.4655 shares of
Pinnacle common stock and $1.50 in cash. Pinnacle shareholders
will continue to own their existing Pinnacle shares. Upon
completion of the merger, Pinnacle shareholders will own
approximately 70.14% of the combined company on a fully diluted
basis, and
Mid-America
shareholders will own approximately 29.86% of the combined
company on a fully diluted basis. The shares of the combined
company will be traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under
the symbol PNFP.
We are asking the Pinnacle shareholders to approve the merger
agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger. We are also asking Pinnacles
shareholders to approve an amendment to Pinnacles 2004
Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares reserved
for issuance thereunder by 500,000 shares. Pinnacles
special meeting will be held:
November 27, 2007
10:00 a.m., local time
211 Commerce Street, Suite 100
Nashville, Tennessee 37201
Pinnacles board of directors unanimously recommends that
Pinnacle shareholders vote FOR the approval of the merger
agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger and FOR the amendment to
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the
number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by
500,000 shares.
We are asking the
Mid-America
shareholders to approve the merger agreement.
Mid-Americas
special meeting will be held:
November 27, 2007
10:00 a.m., local time
551 North Mt. Juliet Road in the Bank of the South Community
Room
Mt. Juliet, Tennessee 37122
Mid-Americas
board of directors unanimously recommends that
Mid-America
shareholders vote FOR the approval of the merger agreement.
We cannot complete the merger unless the shareholders of
Mid-America
approve the merger agreement and the shareholders of Pinnacle
approve the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common
stock in connection with the merger. Your vote is important.
Whether or not you plan to attend your meeting, to ensure your
shares are represented at the meeting, please vote as soon as
possible by completing and submitting the enclosed proxy card.
The board of directors of each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
believe this merger will create a strong combined company that
will deliver important benefits to its shareholders, customers
and employees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
Gary L. Scott, Chairman
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
|
|
Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
|
You are encouraged to carefully consider the risks described
on pages 15 through 18 of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The securities Pinnacle is offering through this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are not savings or deposit accounts or
other obligations of any bank or savings association, and they
are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or
any other governmental agency.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated
October 10, 2007, and is first being mailed to the
shareholders of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
on or about October 15, 2007.
211
Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee
37201
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held on November 27, 2007
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(Pinnacle) will hold a special meeting of
shareholders at 211 Commerce Street, Suite 100, Nashville,
Tennessee 37201, at 10:00 a.m. local time on
November 27, 2007, to consider and vote on the following
matters:
1. A proposal to approve the merger agreement, dated as of
August 15, 2007, between Pinnacle and
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
(Mid-America),
pursuant to which
Mid-America
will merge with and into Pinnacle, and the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached as Appendix A to the joint
proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice;
2. A proposal to approve the adjournment of the Pinnacle
special meeting, if necessary, to permit Pinnacle to solicit
additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the
special meeting to constitute a quorum or to approve the merger
agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger;
3. A proposal to approve an amendment to Pinnacles
2004 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of
Pinnacle common stock reserved for issuance under the plan by
500,000 shares; and
4. To transact any other business that properly comes
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
We have fixed October 9, 2007 as the record date for determining
those Pinnacle shareholders entitled to receive this notice of
and to vote their shares at the special meeting, including any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
The Pinnacle board of directors has approved unanimously the
proposed merger agreement with
Mid-America
and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger and recommends that you vote FOR the approval
of the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common
stock in connection with the merger and for adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary, to permit Pinnacle to solicit
additional proxies. The Pinnacle human resources and
compensation committee has recommended and its board of
directors has approved the amendment to the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan and recommend that you vote For
approval of this amendment. Whether or not you plan to attend
the special meeting, please mark, sign, date and return your
proxy promptly.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Hugh M. Queener
Corporate Secretary
Nashville, Tennessee
October 10, 2007
IMPORTANT
Your vote is important. Please mark, sign, date and return
the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. Remember, your vote is important, so
please act today! This will not prevent you from voting in
person but will help to secure a quorum and avoid added
solicitation costs. Your proxy may be revoked at any time in the
manner more specifically described in the joint proxy
statement/prospectus that accompanies this notice.
2019
Richard Jones Road, Nashville, Tennessee 37215
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held on November 27,
2007
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
(Mid-America)
will hold a special meeting of shareholders at its Bank of the
South office located at 551 North Mt. Juliet Road, Mt. Juliet,
Tennessee 37122, at 10:00 a.m. local time on November 27,
2007, to consider and vote on the following matters:
1. A proposal to approve the merger agreement, dated as of
August 15, 2007, between Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
(Pinnacle) and
Mid-America,
pursuant to which
Mid-America
will merge with and into Pinnacle. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached as Appendix A to the joint
proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice;
2. A proposal to approve the adjournment of the
Mid-America
special meeting, if necessary, to permit
Mid-America
to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at
the special meeting to constitute a quorum or to approve the
merger agreement; and
3. To transact any other business that properly comes
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting.
We have fixed October 9, 2007 as the record date for
determining those
Mid-America
shareholders entitled to receive this notice of and to vote
their shares at the special meeting, including any adjournment
or postponement of the special meeting.
The
Mid-America
board of directors has approved unanimously the proposed merger
agreement with Pinnacle and strongly encourages you to vote for
approval of the merger agreement and for adjournment of the
special meeting, if necessary, to permit
Mid-America
to solicit additional proxies. Whether or not you plan to attend
the special meeting, please mark, sign, date and return your
proxy promptly.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
James S. Short
Corporate Secretary
Nashville, Tennessee
October 10, 2007
IMPORTANT
Your vote is important. Please mark, sign, date and return
the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. Remember, your vote is important, so
please act today! This will not prevent you from voting in
person but will help to secure a quorum and avoid added
solicitation costs. Your proxy may be revoked at any time in the
manner more specifically described in the joint proxy
statement/prospectus that accompanies this notice.
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus serves two purposes: it is
a proxy statement being used by both the Pinnacle Financial
Partners, Inc. board of directors and the
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc. board of directors to solicit proxies for use
at their respective special meetings. It is also the prospectus
of Pinnacle regarding the Pinnacle common stock to be issued to
Mid-America
shareholders if the merger is completed. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus provides you with detailed information
about the proposed merger of
Mid-America
into Pinnacle. We encourage you to read this entire joint proxy
statement/prospectus carefully. Pinnacle has filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on
Form S-4,
as amended, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is the prospectus filed as
part of that registration statement. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information in
the registration statement nor does it include the exhibits to
the registration statement. Please see WHERE YOU CAN FIND
MORE INFORMATION on page 133.
When used in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the terms
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
refer to Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. and
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc., respectively, and, when the context requires,
to Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. and
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc. and their respective predecessors and
subsidiaries. We or us refer to both
Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference
important business and financial information about Pinnacle and
Mid-America
that is not included in or delivered with this document. You
should refer to WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
on page 133 for a description of the documents incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You can
obtain documents related to Pinnacle and
Mid-America
that are incorporated by reference into this document through
the SECs web site at www.sec.gov. You may also obtain
copies of these documents, other than exhibits, unless such
exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into the
information that this joint proxy statement/prospectus
incorporates, without charge by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the appropriate company:
|
|
|
If you are a Pinnacle shareholder:
|
|
If you are a Mid-America shareholder:
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
|
|
Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
|
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300
|
|
2019 Richard Jones Road
|
Nashville, TN 37201
|
|
Nashville, Tennessee 37215
|
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Attention: Investor Relations
|
(615)
744-3700
|
|
(615) 690-5800
|
|
|
|
TO OBTAIN TIMELY DELIVERY OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS,
INC. DOCUMENTS, YOU MUST MAKE YOUR REQUEST ON OR BEFORE
NOVEMBER 9, 2007.
|
|
TO OBTAIN TIMELY DELIVERY OF MID-AMERICA BANCSHARES, INC.
DOCUMENTS, YOU MUST MAKE YOUR REQUEST ON OR BEFORE
NOVEMBER 9, 2007.
|
Pinnacle maintains a website at www.pnfp.com and
Mid-America
maintains a website at
www.mid-americabancsharesinc.com.
The information contained on these websites is not incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and you
should not consider it a part of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
You should rely only on the information incorporated by
reference into or provided in or with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to vote at your special meeting. We have
not authorized anyone to give you different information. You
should not assume that the information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, or in any documents delivered with this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, or any supplement, is accurate
as of any date other than the date on the front of such
documents, and neither the mailing of the joint proxy
statement/prospectus to you nor the issuance of Pinnacle common
stock in connection with the merger shall create any implication
to the contrary.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any
securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any state in
which or from any person to whom it is not lawful to make any
such offer or solicitation.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
18
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
79
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT VOTING AND THE MERGER
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote upon and how does my board
recommend I vote? |
|
A: |
|
Shareholders of both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
are being asked to (1) approve the merger agreement
pursuant to which Pinnacle will acquire
Mid-America
by merger, with Pinnacle being the surviving corporation, as
well as, in the case of Pinnacle shareholders, to approve the
issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger
and (2) to permit adjournment of their respective meetings
to permit the solicitation of additional proxies in the event
there are insufficient votes to constitute a quorum or to
approve the matters presented at such special meetings.
Additionally, Pinnacle shareholders are being asked to approve
the amendment of Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to
reserve an additional 500,000 shares of Pinnacle common
stock for issuance under the plan. |
|
|
|
Both the Pinnacle and
Mid-America
boards of directors have determined unanimously that the
proposed merger is advisable and in the best interests of the
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
shareholders, respectively, and each board recommends that its
respective shareholders vote For approval of the
merger agreement and For the adjournment proposals.
In addition, members of
Mid-Americas
board of directors have entered into agreements with Pinnacle in
which they agree to vote their shares of
Mid-America
common stock in favor of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
Pinnacles board also recommends unanimously that its
shareholders approve the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger and vote For the
amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
Neither Pinnacles board of directors nor
Mid-Americas
board of directors is aware of any other business to be
considered at their respective special meetings. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the merger of Pinnacle with
Mid-America
or the adjournment of a special meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The approval of the merger agreement and, in the case of the
Pinnacle shareholders, the approval of the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger requires:
(1) the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of
Pinnacles common stock outstanding on October 9,
2007, and (2) the affirmative vote of a majority of the
shares of
Mid-Americas
common stock outstanding on October 9, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
If a quorum does not exist at the Pinnacle special meeting,
adjournment requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the special meeting. If a
quorum exists at the Pinnacle special meeting but there are not
enough affirmative votes to approve the merger agreement and
issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger,
the special meeting may be adjourned if the votes cast, in
person or by proxy, at the Pinnacle special meeting favoring the
proposal to adjourn exceed the votes cast, in person or by
proxy, opposing the proposal to adjourn. |
|
|
|
Similarly, if a quorum does not exist at the
Mid-America
special meeting, adjournment requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the
special meeting. If a quorum exists at the
Mid-America
special meeting but there are not enough affirmative votes to
approve the merger agreement, the special meeting may be
adjourned if the votes cast, in person or by proxy, at the
Mid-America
special meeting favoring the proposal to adjourn exceed the
votes cast, in person or by proxy, opposing the proposal to
adjourn. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is my vote important? |
|
A: |
|
Under the Tennessee Business Corporation Act, or TBCA, which
governs both Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
the merger agreement must be approved by the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
common stock entitled to vote. In addition, Pinnacles
charter requires that, since the merger was approved by at least
a two-thirds vote of Pinnacles board of directors, it can
be approved by a majority of Pinnacles outstanding common
stock entitled to vote. Accordingly, if a Pinnacle or
Mid-America
shareholder fails to vote, or if a Pinnacle or
Mid-America
shareholder abstains, that will |
1
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for Pinnacle and
Mid-America
to obtain the approval of the merger agreement. If you are a
Pinnacle shareholder, your failure to vote will have the same
effect as a vote against the approval of the merger agreement
and the issuance of Pinnacle stock in connection with the
merger. If you are a
Mid-America
shareholder, your failure to vote will have the same effect as a
vote against the approval of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
The amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan will
be approved if the number of shares of Pinnacle common stock
voted in favor of the proposal exceeds the number of shares of
Pinnacle common stock voted against it. Therefore, abstaining
from voting on the amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
will have no effect on whether the proposal is approved so long
as a quorum is present. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
After you carefully read this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
please respond as soon as possible by completing, signing and
dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed
postage-paid return envelope so that your shares will be
represented and voted at your respective special meeting |
|
|
|
The boards of directors of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
each unanimously recommend that the shareholders of Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
as the case may be, vote in favor of each of the proposals on
which they will be voting at their respective special
meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. If you do not provide your broker with instructions on
how to vote your street name shares, your broker
will not be permitted to vote them, in the case of
Mid-America
shareholders, on the approval of the merger agreement, or, in
the case of Pinnacle shareholders, on the approval of the merger
agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger or the amendment to Pinnacles
2004 Equity Incentive Plan. You should, therefore, be sure to
provide your broker with instructions on how to vote your
shares. Please check the voting form used by your broker to see
if it offers telephone or Internet submission of proxies. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I fail to instruct my broker? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you fail to instruct your broker to vote your shares and the
broker submits an unvoted proxy, the resulting broker
non-vote will be counted toward a quorum at the
respective special meeting, but it will otherwise have the
consequence of a vote Against approval of the merger
agreement, and, for Pinnacle shareholders, the issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger. A failure
to instruct your broker to vote your shares on the proposal to
amend the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan will have no impact on that
proposal so long as a quorum is present. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have delivered my proxy card? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at your meeting. You can do this in any of the three
following ways: |
|
|
|
by sending a written notice to the corporate
secretary of Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
as appropriate, in time to be received before your special
meeting stating that you would like to revoke your proxy;
|
|
|
|
by completing, signing and dating another proxy card
bearing a later date and returning it by mail in time to be
received before your special meeting, in which case your
later-submitted proxy will be recorded and your earlier proxy
revoked; or
|
|
|
|
if you are a holder of record, by attending the
special meeting and voting in person.
|
|
|
|
If your shares are held in an account at a broker or bank, you
should contact your broker or bank to change your vote. |
2
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the amendment to
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan? |
|
A: |
|
The amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to
increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder
by 500,000 shares will be approved if the number of shares
of Pinnacle common stock voted in favor of the amendment exceed
the votes cast opposing the action. A properly executed proxy
marked ABSTAIN with respect to this proposal will
not be voted on the proposal, although it will be counted in
determining whether there is a quorum. Therefore, abstaining
from voting on the amendment to the Pinnacles 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan will have no effect on whether the proposal is
approved so long as a quorum is present. |
|
|
|
Approval of the amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is
not dependent on approval of the merger, nor is approval of the
merger dependent on approval of the amendment to the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan. |
|
Q: |
|
Why are Pinnacle and
Mid-America
proposing to merge? |
|
A: |
|
The boards of directors of both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
believe that, among other things, the merger will provide the
resulting company with expanded opportunities for profitable
growth. In addition, the boards believe that by combining the
resources of the two companies, the resulting company will have
an improved ability to compete in the changing and competitive
financial services industry. |
|
Q: |
|
What will
Mid-America
shareholders receive as a result of the merger? |
|
A: |
|
As a shareholder of
Mid-America,
you will receive shares of Pinnacle common stock based on a
formula in which each share of
Mid-America
common stock you own at the effective time of the merger will be
converted into the right to receive 0.4655 shares of
Pinnacle common stock and $1.50 in cash. Fractional shares will
be converted into cash based on the average closing price of
Pinnacles common stock for the five trading days preceding
the effective date of the merger as reported by the Wall Street
Journal. Based on the number of
Mid-America
shares outstanding as of August 15, 2007 plus
260,000 shares of restricted stock outstanding as of that
date, Pinnacle expects to issue approximately 6.6 million
shares of Pinnacle common stock to the
Mid-America
shareholders. |
|
Q: |
|
How will the value of the consideration
Mid-America
shareholders may receive be determined? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Because the merger is based upon a fixed exchange ratio, the
value
Mid-America
shareholders receive will fluctuate based upon fluctuations in
the market price of Pinnacles common stock. As of
October 9, 2007, the most recent practical date prior to
the date of this joint proxy statement/ prospectus,
Pinnacles closing stock price was $30.62. Accordingly,
based upon that price, each share of
Mid-America
would receive Pinnacle stock with a value of $14.25 ($30.62
times 0.4655) and $1.50 in cash. Any resulting fractional shares
will be converted into cash. In the period between the
announcement of the merger on August 15, 2007 and
October 9, 2007, the closing price of Pinnacles
common stock has ranged from $26.40 to $31.21 which would equate
to a range of $12.29 to $14.53 in per share value to
Mid-Americas
shareholders. You should obtain a current stock price
quotation for Pinnacle common stock. You can get this
quotation from a newspaper, on the Internet or by calling your
broker. Shares of
Mid-America
are not listed or traded on a national exchange or
over-the-counter. Based on information known to
Mid-America
senior management, the only price paid for shares of
Mid-America
common stock during the week ended August 14, 2007 (the day
prior to the signing of the merger agreement) was $12.25 per
share on August 8, 2007. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
I am a
Mid-America
shareholder. Should I send in my stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. After the merger is completed, Pinnacle will send
Mid-America
shareholders written instructions for exchanging their stock
certificates for merger consideration. You should not send in
your stock certificates until you receive these instructions. |
|
Q: |
|
I am a Pinnacle shareholder. Should I send in my common stock
certificates? |
|
A: |
|
No. Outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock will remain
outstanding following the merger with
Mid-America,
with no additional action required by Pinnacle shareholders. |
3
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Will shareholders have dissenters rights? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are a
Mid-America
shareholder and you follow the procedures prescribed by
Tennessee law, you may dissent from the merger and have the fair
value of your stock paid to you in cash. If you follow those
procedures, you wont receive Pinnacle common stock. The
fair value of your
Mid-America
common stock, determined in the manner prescribed by Tennessee
law, will be paid to you in cash. That amount could be more or
less than the merger consideration or the market value of
Pinnacle common stock as of the closing date of the merger. For
a more complete description of these dissenters rights,
see page 55 and Appendix B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus where the full text of the Tennessee
Dissenters Rights Statute is set out. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders of Pinnacle are not entitled to dissenters or
appraisal rights in connection with the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the federal income tax consequences to
Mid-America
shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
For federal income tax purposes,
Mid-America
shareholders who exchange their shares for Pinnacle common stock
will generally not recognize gain or loss on the exchange, but
will be taxed on the cash portion of the merger consideration to
the extent of any gain and any cash paid for fractional shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
Please see page 53 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
for a description of the material United States federal income
tax consequences of the merger. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
I am a
Mid-America
shareholder. May I sell the shares of Pinnacle common stock that
I will receive in the merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Generally, yes. Shares of Pinnacle common stock that you receive
in the merger will be freely transferable, unless you are an
affiliate of
Mid-America
under applicable federal securities laws. Affiliates generally
include directors, certain executive officers and holders of 10%
or more of
Mid-Americas
common stock. Generally, all shares of Pinnacle common stock
received by affiliates of
Mid-America
(including shares they beneficially own for others) may not be
sold by them, except in compliance with the Securities Act of
1933, as amended. For more detail regarding this subject, see
page 58. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
|
A: |
|
We anticipate that the merger will be completed late in the
fourth quarter of 2007 or early in the first quarter of 2008. In
addition to shareholder approvals, we must also obtain certain
regulatory approvals. Any delay in obtaining such approvals may
delay the consummation of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
If Ive lost my
Mid-America
stock certificate, can I receive consideration in the merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. However, you will have to provide an affidavit attesting to
the fact that you lost your
Mid-America
stock certificate. Additionally, you may have to give Pinnacle
or the exchange agent a bond of 1.5% of the value of your shares
to indemnify Pinnacle against a loss in the event someone finds
or has your lost certificate and is able to transfer it. To
avoid these measures, you should do everything you can to find
your lost certificate before the time comes to send it in. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where will my shares be listed after the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Shares of Pinnacles common stock issued in the transaction
will be listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and will trade
under the symbol PNFP. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A: |
|
If you want additional copies of this document, or if you want
to ask any questions about the merger, you should contact: |
|
|
|
|
|
Investor Relations
|
|
or
|
|
Investor Relations
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
|
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300
|
|
|
|
2019 Richard Jones Road
|
Nashville, TN 37201
|
|
|
|
Nashville, TN 37215
|
(615)
744-3700
|
|
|
|
(615) 690-5800
|
4
This brief summary highlights selected information from this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. It does not contain all of the
information that may be important to you. You should read
carefully this entire document and the other documents to which
this joint proxy statement/prospectus refers you to fully
understand the merger. See WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION beginning on page 133. Each item in this
summary refers to the page where that subject is discussed in
more detail.
Information
about Pinnacle and
Mid-America
(Pages 105 and 106)
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
211 Commerce Street
Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37201
(615) 744-3700
Pinnacle is a Tennessee corporation that was incorporated on
February 28, 2000 to organize and serve as the holding
company for Pinnacle National Bank, a national banking
association chartered under the laws of the United States.
Pinnacle National Bank commenced its banking operations on
October 27, 2000 and operates as a community bank in urban
markets emphasizing personalized banking relationships with
individuals and businesses located within the
Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro and Knoxville metropolitan
statistical areas, or Nashville MSA and Knoxville MSA,
respectively. Pinnacle owns 100% of the capital stock of
Pinnacle National Bank.
In March 2006, Pinnacle acquired Cavalry Bancorp, Inc., a
one-bank holding company located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee,
with nine office locations in Rutherford, Sumner and Bedford
counties in Tennessee. In connection with that transaction,
Pinnacle National Bank merged with Cavalrys bank
subsidiary, with Pinnacle National Bank surviving.
Pinnacle National Banks primary service area is Davidson,
Williamson, Sumner and Rutherford Counties within the Nashville
MSA. This area represents a geographic area that covers
approximately 4,000 square miles with an estimated
population in excess of 1.6 million people based on
U.S. Census Bureau estimates for 2006. In April 2007,
Pinnacle opened an office in Knoxville, Tennessee. The Knoxville
MSA, with an estimated population of approximately 670,000,
based on U.S. Census Bureau estimates for 2006, is located
in east Tennessee.
Pinnacle offers a full range of lending products, including
commercial, real estate and consumer loans to individuals and
small-to-medium-sized businesses and professional entities.
Pinnacle also contracts with Raymond James Financial Service,
Inc., a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser, to
offer and sell various securities and other financial products
to the public from Pinnacles locations through Pinnacle
employees that are also Raymond James employees. Pinnacle
benefits from the commissions generated through this program.
Pinnacle also maintains a trust department which provides
fiduciary and investment management services for individual and
institutional clients. Account types include personal trust,
endowments, foundations, individual retirement accounts,
pensions and custody. Pinnacle has also established Pinnacle
Advisory Services, Inc., a registered investment advisor, to
provide investment advisory services to its clients.
Additionally, Miller and Loughry Insurance Services, Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle acquired in connection with
the Cavalry acquisition, provides insurance products,
particularly in the property and casualty area, to its clients.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation information as of
June 30, 2006 reflects that there are 175 commercial banks
that are currently active and also were chartered in the United
States in 2000, excluding those institutions that appear to have
transferred an existing charter to a new charter. Based on this
information, Pinnacle National Bank was the largest and fastest
growing of these banks in terms of total assets. We believe that
one of the principal factors contributing to our rapid growth to
date has been our ability to
5
effectively position ourselves as a locally managed community
bank committed to providing outstanding service and trusted
financial advice. As of June 30, 2007, Pinnacle had total
assets of approximately $2.32 billion, total deposits of
approximately $1.80 billion and total shareholders
equity of approximately $265.2 million.
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
2019 Richard Jones Road
Nashville, Tennessee 37215
(615) 690-5800
Mid-America
is a two-bank holding company headquartered in Nashville,
Tennessee. It began operations in September 2006 as a result of
the merger of equals and share exchange between PrimeTrust Bank,
a state bank chartered under Tennessee law, that began
operations on December 17, 2001, and Bank of the South, a
state bank chartered under Tennessee law that began operations
on April 30, 2001. Both banks offer a wide range of banking
services including checking, savings, money market accounts,
certificates of deposits and loans for consumer, commercial and
real-estate purposes.
Through its bank subsidiaries,
Mid-America
serves individuals, small to medium-sized businesses, community
organizations, and public entities. The area served by
Mid-Americas
bank subsidiaries covers Cheatham, Davidson, Dickson,
Rutherford, Williamson, and Wilson counties.
Mid-America
currently has fourteen full-service banking offices in six
counties. Both banks provide full-service brokerage services
(selling products such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, limited
partnerships, annuities and other insurance products) through a
network arrangement with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
a non-affiliated company.
Mid-America
benefits from the commissions generated through this arrangement.
At June 30, 2007,
Mid-America
had total assets of $1.07 billion, total deposits of
$904.7 million and total shareholders equity of
$104.7 million.
Mid-America
Will Merge With and Into Pinnacle (Page 41)
We propose a merger of
Mid-America
with and into Pinnacle. Pinnacle will survive the merger. We
have attached the merger agreement to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Appendix A. Please read the
merger agreement carefully. It is the legal document that
governs the merger. In addition to the merger of
Mid-America
with and into Pinnacle, the parties plan to consolidate Bank of
the South and PrimeTrust Bank with Pinnacle National Bank after
the Mid-America merger.
What
Mid-America
Shareholders Will Receive in the Merger (Page 78)
Mid-America
shareholders will receive 0.4655 shares of Pinnacle common
stock and $1.50 in cash for each share of
Mid-America
common stock owned by them at the effective time of the merger.
Based on the number of
Mid-America
shares outstanding as of August 15, 2007 plus
260,000 shares of restricted stock outstanding as of that
date, Pinnacle expects to issue approximately 6.6 million
shares of Pinnacle common stock to the
Mid-America
shareholders. Pinnacle will not issue fractional shares in the
merger. As a result, the total number of shares of Pinnacle
common stock that each
Mid-America
shareholder will receive in the merger will be rounded down to
the nearest whole number, and each
Mid-America
shareholder will receive a cash payment for the remaining
fraction of a share of Pinnacle stock that he or she would
otherwise receive, if any, rounded to the nearest thousandth
when expressed in decimal form based on the average closing
market value of Pinnacle common stock for the five trading days
preceding the effective date of the merger.
Example: If you currently own 150 shares of
Mid-America
common stock, you will be entitled to receive 69 shares of
Pinnacle common stock (150
Mid-America
shares x 0.4655) and a check for $225 (150 x $1.50 ) plus the
market value of 0.8250 fractional shares of Pinnacle common
stock (150 x .4655) = 69.8250 shares 69 whole
shares = .8250 fractional shares) based on the average closing
market value of Pinnacle common stock for the five trading days
preceding the effective date of the merger.
6
The number of shares of Pinnacle common stock to be issued in
connection with the merger for each share of
Mid-America
common stock is fixed. Shareholders of
Mid-America
may receive more or less aggregate value depending on
fluctuations in the market price of Pinnacle common stock.
Because there are other conditions to closing than shareholder
approval, a significant period of time may pass between the
shareholder meetings and the closing of the merger. At the time
of their respective special meetings, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
shareholders will not know the exact value of the Pinnacle
common stock that will be issued in connection with the merger.
You should obtain a current stock price quotation for
Pinnacle common stock. You can obtain these quotations from
a newspaper, on the Internet or by calling your broker. Shares
of
Mid-America
are not listed or traded on a national exchange or
over-the-counter. Based on information known to
Mid-America
senior management, the only price paid for shares of
Mid-America
common stock during the week ended August 14, 2007 (the day
prior to the signing of the merger agreement) was $12.25 per
share on August 8, 2007.
Dividend
Policy of Pinnacle (Page 33)
Pinnacle has not paid any cash dividends since inception and it
does not anticipate that it will consider paying cash dividends
at any point in the near future. The declaration and payment of
dividends in the future will depend upon business conditions,
operating results, capital and reserve requirements, regulatory
requirements and consideration by the Pinnacle board of
directors of other relevant factors.
Pinnacles
Financial Advisor Has Provided an Opinion to the Pinnacle Board
as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration from a Financial
Point of View (Page 60)
In connection with the merger, Pinnacle retained Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P., or Sandler
ONeill, as its financial advisor. In deciding to adopt the
merger agreement, the Pinnacle board of directors considered the
oral opinion of Sandler ONeill provided to the Pinnacle
board of directors on August 15, 2007, subsequently
confirmed in writing as of August 15, 2007, that, as of the
date of the opinion and based upon and subject to the
considerations described in its opinion and other matters which
Sandler ONeill considered relevant, the aggregate merger
consideration to be paid by Pinnacle pursuant to the merger
agreement was fair from a financial point of view to Pinnacle.
The full text of the written opinion of Sandler ONeill,
dated August 15, 2007, which sets forth, among other
things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Sandler
ONeill in connection with the opinion, is attached to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix C.
Sandler ONeill provided its opinion for the information
and assistance of the Pinnacle board of directors in connection
with its consideration of the transaction contemplated by the
merger agreement. You should read the opinion carefully, as well
as the description of the opinion contained elsewhere in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, to understand the procedures
followed, assumptions made, matters considered and
qualifications and limitations concerning the review undertaken
by, and the opinion of, Sandler ONeill. The Sandler
ONeill opinion is addressed to the Pinnacle board of
directors and is not a recommendation as to how any shareholder
of either Pinnacle or
Mid-America
should vote with respect to the merger agreement and the
issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger.
Pinnacle has paid $200,000 to Sandler ONeill and has
agreed to pay Sandler ONeill an additional $550,000 upon
the completion of the merger.
Mid-Americas
Financial Advisor Has Provided an Opinion to the
Mid-America
Board as to the Fairness of the Merger Consideration from a
Financial Point of View (Page 69)
In connection with the merger,
Mid-America
retained Hovde Financial, Inc., or Hovde, as its financial
advisor. In deciding to adopt the merger agreement, the
Mid-America
board of directors considered the oral opinion of Hovde that, as
of August 15, 2007, and subsequently confirmed in writing
on August 15, 2007, and based upon and subject to the
assumptions made, matters considered and limitations described
in their opinion, the merger consideration was fair, from a
financial point of view, to
Mid-America
and the holders of
Mid-America
common stock.
7
The full text of the written opinion of Hovde, dated
August 15, 2007, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by Hovde in connection with
the opinion, is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Appendix D. Hovde provided
its opinion for the information and assistance of the
Mid-America
board of directors in connection with its consideration of the
transaction contemplated by the merger agreement. You should
read the opinion carefully, as well as the description of the
opinion contained elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, to understand the procedures followed,
assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and
limitations concerning the review undertaken by, and the opinion
of, Hovde. The Hovde opinion is addressed to the
Mid-America
board of directors and is not a recommendation as to how any
shareholder of either
Mid-America
or Pinnacle should vote with respect to the merger agreement.
Mid-America
has agreed to pay Hovde, upon completion of the merger, a fee of
approximately $2.2 million based on the transaction
consideration value as of the date of the merger agreement.
The
Merger Generally Will Be Tax-Free to Holders of
Mid-America
Common Stock to the Extent They Receive Pinnacle Common Stock
But Will Be Taxable With Respect to Any Cash Received
(Page 53)
A
Mid-America
shareholders receipt of Pinnacle common stock in the
merger will be tax-free for United States federal income
tax purposes. Taxes will, however, be owed to the extent of any
gain on any cash portion of the consideration received by a
Mid-America
shareholder and any receipt of cash in lieu of fractional shares
of Pinnacle common stock.
There will be no United States federal income tax consequences
to a holder of Pinnacle common stock as a result of the merger.
The United States federal income tax consequences described
above may not apply to some holders of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
common stock, including some types of holders specifically
referred to on page 54. Accordingly, please consult your
tax advisor for a full understanding of the particular tax
consequences of the merger to you.
Mid-America
Directors and Executive Officers Have Some Financial Interests
in the Merger That are Different From or in Addition to Their
Interests as Shareholders (Page 56)
Mid-America
directors and executive officers have financial and other
interests in the merger in addition to their interests as
shareholders of
Mid-America.
These interests include:
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
has change in control agreements with its four senior executive
officers who are directors that provide for lump-sum payments
and other benefits (including indemnification for tax
liabilities) following a change in control. The merger will
constitute a change in control under these agreements and the
lump-sum payment will be made to the employees at the closing.
On August 15, 2007, these agreements were amended to
provide that if the merger is consummated in 2007, the
executives will be paid their change in control payments as if
the merger occurred on January 1, 2008. These payments and
benefits are estimated to total approximately $5.7 million
in the aggregate and will be paid by
Mid-America
immediately prior to the closing of the merger. See
PROPOSAL #1 FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL
PARTNERS, INC. AND
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: THE PROPOSED MERGER Interests of
Certain
Mid-America
Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger on
page 56 for more information about these payments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason K. West, PrimeTrusts President and Chief Operating
Officer, has entered into a new employment agreement with
Pinnacle National Bank, which will become effective as of the
closing of the merger and have a three-year term. This agreement
provides for the payment of compensation and benefits to
Mr. West and contains a covenant not to compete. While not
parties to any written agreement with Pinnacle, it is expected
that Gary Scott, David Major and Sam Short will work for the
combined company for at least 12 months.
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless each present
and former director, officer and employee of
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries following completion of the merger. This
indemnification
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
covers liability and expenses arising out of matters existing or
occurring at or prior to the completion of the merger to the
fullest extent such persons would have been indemnified as
directors, officers or employees of
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries under existing indemnification
agreements
and/or
applicable law. This indemnification extends to liability
arising out of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. Pinnacle also has agreed that it will maintain a
policy of directors and officers liability insurance
coverage for the benefit of all of
Mid-Americas
and its subsidiaries directors and officers as of
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger for six
years following completion of the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the effective time of the merger, Pinnacles board of
directors will be expanded by at least three members, and three
members of the existing
Mid-America
board of directors who are proposed by
Mid-Americas
nominating and corporate governance committee and reasonably
acceptable to Pinnacles nominating and corporate
governance committee and board of directors will fill three of
these vacancies. As members of the Pinnacle board of directors,
the new directors who are not employees of Pinnacle can be
expected to receive $1,100 for each board meeting attended and
$900 for each committee meeting attended. In addition, these
non-employee directors also may receive equity awards under
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan similar to those
awarded to Pinnacles non-employee directors in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Each of Gary Scott, David Major, Jason West and Sam Short has
entered into a business protection agreement with
Mid-America.
Under the terms of these agreements, each of Messrs. Scott,
Major, West and Short has agreed that he will not actively
participate or engage directly or indirectly in a competing
business in the Nashville MSA and the counties contiguous to the
Nashville MSA until the earlier of (1) voluntary retirement
after reaching age 65; (2) a transaction in which an
acquiror of
Mid-America
is subsequently acquired; (3) August 31, 2011; or
(4) the date that
Mid-America
terminates the agreement. In exchange for this agreement not to
compete, each executive is entitled to receive monthly payments
equal to the greater of his current or future monthly base
salary or $10,000 until the occurrence of one of these
termination events. Mr. Wests business protection
agreement will be superseded by his employment agreement with
Pinnacle National Bank upon the effectiveness of the merger.
|
|
|
|
All of Mid-Americas outstanding options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted shares will vest upon
consumation of the merger, including those options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted shares held by
Mid-Americas directors and executive officers. These
awards, which were granted in 2006, in connection with the
completion of Mid-Americas share exchange, were scheduled
to vest over ten years. Instead, as a result of the merger,
these awards to directors and executive officers (with an
aggregate value of approximately $3.6 million (based on the
value of the consideration to be paid by Pinnacle on the date
the merger was approved)) will vest at the effective time of the
merger.
|
The
Mid-America
board of directors knew about these additional interests, and
considered them, when it adopted the merger agreement.
Pinnacles
Board of Directors Recommends that You Vote FOR
Approval of the Merger Agreement and the Stock Issuance in
Connection With the Merger (Page 48)
Pinnacles board of directors believes that the merger is
fair to and in the best interests of the Pinnacle shareholders,
and recommends that Pinnacle shareholders vote FOR
the approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger.
In determining whether to adopt the merger agreement,
Pinnacles board of directors consulted with its senior
management and legal and financial advisors. In arriving at its
determination, the Pinnacle board of directors also considered a
number of factors, including the following material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
stronger presence in the Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro MSA,
one of the fastest growing MSAs in the United States, including
areas within the MSA not presently served by Pinnacle, including
Wilson, Dickson and Cheatham Counties;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
potential cost synergies the combined company will
operate a common systems platform and three
Mid-America
and Pinnacle branches will be consolidated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased size and scale the combined company is
expected to have pro forma assets of approximately
$3.5 billion, resulting in increased lending capacity, and
30 offices (net of closures) in some of the fastest growing
areas in the Nashville MSA;
|
|
|
|
enhanced franchise value the increased size and
scale of the combined company should increase its attractiveness
to larger potential acquirors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
accretive to earnings applying the potential cost
savings and other assumptions (described under OPINIONS OF
FINANCIAL ADVISORS Opinion of Pinnacles
Financial Advisor beginning on page 60), the merger
is anticipated to result in accretion to Pinnacles
earnings per share beginning in 2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
increased float pro forma shares outstanding of the
combined company would increase from approximately
15.5 million shares to 22.2 million shares.
|
Mid-Americas
Board of Directors Recommends that You Vote FOR the
Approval of the Merger Agreement (Page 49)
Mid-Americas
board of directors believes that the merger is fair to and in
the best interests of the
Mid-America
shareholders, and recommends that
Mid-America
shareholders vote FOR the approval of the merger
agreement.
In determining whether to adopt the merger agreement,
Mid-Americas
board of directors consulted with its senior management and
legal and financial advisors. In arriving at its determination,
the
Mid-America
board of directors also considered a number of factors,
including the following material factors in favor of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacles shares are readily marketable and have reflected
a strong overall upward trend for most of Pinnacles time
in operation;
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle is a locally headquartered bank holding company that
appears to employ a veteran group of skilled bankers that will
be attractive to
Mid-Americas
customers, employees and other stakeholders;
|
|
|
|
At the present time relatively little market overlap exists
between Pinnacles operations and those of Bank of the
South and PrimeTrust Bank;
|
|
|
|
The
Mid-America
board believed that an affiliation with Pinnacle would make the
combined entity both more competitive in the Middle Tennessee
marketplace and a more attractive vehicle for entry into the
market by a larger acquirer than either institution would on a
standalone basis;
|
|
|
|
The cost-saving synergies that could be achieved in the merger,
estimated at $7.4 million to $9 million, can be
expected to increase the profitability of the combined
institution;
|
|
|
|
If
Mid-America
were to remain independent, the company would have to consider
the costs and benefits of raising new capital, listing its
shares for public trading, and converting to a new data
processing platform;
|
|
|
|
The costs of complying with increasing layers of bank
regulation, and with the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, were a concern to management and the
Mid-America
board;
|
|
|
|
A merger would be expected to be a tax free
re-organization for most non-dissenting shareholders except to
the extent of the possible taxability of the $1.50 per share
being paid in cash by Pinnacle for each share of
Mid-America
common stock;
|
|
|
|
The
Mid-America
board of directors was impressed with the management depth at
Pinnacle and believed that access to the Pinnacle management
team would benefit
Mid-Americas
customers and
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
employees and would provide significant layers of additional
capable management and appropriate management
succession; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of directors considered the impact of the transaction
on the return on investment of
Mid-Americas
shareholders and believed that the merger consideration of
approximately $13.18 per share on the date the transaction was
announced ($15.83 on the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus), involving receipt by
Mid-America
shareholders of a more liquid and potentially more attractive
stock of the combined entity, constituted a reasonable or even
excellent return to investors who bought shares directly from
either Bank of the South or PrimeTrust Bank before the
Mid-America
share exchange in September 2006.
|
Treatment
of
Mid-America
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
(Page 78)
Each outstanding
Mid-America
stock option and stock appreciation right to be settled in
shares of
Mid-America
common stock will be assumed by Pinnacle as of the completion of
the merger and will be converted automatically into an option to
purchase common stock of Pinnacle or a stock appreciation right
to be settled in shares of Pinnacle common stock, as the case
may be. In the case of options, the number of shares of common
stock underlying the new option will equal the number of shares
of
Mid-America
common stock for which the corresponding
Mid-America
option was exercisable, multiplied by 0.4655 and rounded down to
the nearest whole share. The exercise price for
Mid-America
options will be adjusted by reducing the exercise price by $1.50
and then dividing the resulting reduced exercise price by 0.4655
and rounding the result to the nearest whole cent. All other
terms of the
Mid-America
stock options will remain unchanged after the conversion. Each
outstanding stock appreciation right will be adjusted by
(1) multiplying the number of stock appreciation rights
subject to an award by 0.4655, rounding the result down to the
nearest whole share; and (2) reducing the grant price by
$1.50 and dividing the resulting reduced grant price by 0.4655
and rounding the result to the nearest cent. All other terms of
the
Mid-America
stock appreciation rights will remain unchanged.
The
Merger is Expected to Occur Late in the Fourth Quarter of 2007
or Early in the First Quarter of 2008 (Page 79)
The merger will occur after all the conditions to its completion
have been satisfied or waived. Currently, we anticipate that the
merger will occur in the late fourth quarter of 2007 or early
first quarter of 2008. However, we cannot assure you when or if
the merger will occur. We must first obtain approval of
Pinnacles shareholders of the merger agreement and the
issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger
and approval by
Mid-Americas
shareholders of the merger agreement at the respective special
meetings. We also must obtain necessary regulatory approvals. If
the merger has not been completed by March 31, 2008, either
Pinnacle or
Mid-America
may terminate the merger agreement so long as the party electing
to terminate has not caused the failure of the merger to occur
by failing to comply with the merger agreement.
Completion
of the Merger is Subject to Customary Conditions
(Page 80)
The completion of the merger is subject to a number of customary
conditions being met, including the approval by
Mid-America
shareholders of the merger agreement and the approval by
Pinnacle shareholders of the merger agreement and the issuance
of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger, as well
as receipt of all required regulatory approvals.
Where the law permits, a party to the merger agreement could
elect to waive a condition to its obligation to complete the
merger, even if that condition has not been satisfied. We cannot
be certain when (or if) the conditions to the merger will be
satisfied or waived or that the merger will be completed.
We
May Not Complete the Merger Without All Required Regulatory
Approvals (Page 59)
We cannot complete the merger unless we receive the prior
approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, or the FRB.
11
Termination
of the Merger Agreement; Fees Payable (Page 85)
We may jointly agree to terminate the merger agreement at any
time. Either of us also may terminate the merger agreement if:
|
|
|
|
|
a governmental authority that must grant a regulatory approval
denies approval of the merger (although this termination right
is not available to a party whose failure to comply with the
merger agreement resulted in those actions by a governmental
authority);
|
|
|
|
a governmental entity of competent jurisdiction issues a final
nonappealable order enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the
merger;
|
|
|
|
the merger is not completed on or before March 31, 2008
(although this termination right is not available to a party
whose failure to comply with the merger agreement resulted in
the failure to complete the merger by that date);
|
|
|
|
the other partys board of directors adversely changes its
recommendation that its shareholders vote FOR
approval of the merger agreement (in the case of
Mid-America)
or the approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger (in the case
of Pinnacle), or the other party breaches its obligation to hold
its shareholders meeting to approve the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the other party is in breach of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements set forth in the merger agreement and
the breach rises to a level that would excuse the terminating
partys obligation to complete the merger and is either
incurable or is not cured within 30 days;
|
|
|
|
the shareholders of
Mid-America
do not approve the merger agreement at the
Mid-America
shareholders meeting; or
|
|
|
|
the shareholders of Pinnacle do not approve the merger agreement
and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger at the Pinnacle shareholders meeting.
|
In addition,
Mid-America
has the right to terminate the merger agreement if
Pinnacles average closing stock price over a
ten-day
period prior to and ending on the eighth day before the closing
is less than $18.00 and the quotient resulting from dividing
Pinnacles average closing stock price for that same
ten-day period by the average closing price for Pinnacles
common stock for the
ten-day
period prior to and ending on August 15, 2007 ($25.095) is
less than the difference between (1) the quotient resulting
from dividing the Nasdaq Bank Index on the eighth day prior to
the closing of the merger by the Nasdaq Bank Index on
August 15, 2007 (2,874.37) and (2) 0.25.
The merger agreement provides that in limited circumstances,
described more fully beginning on page 85, involving a
change in the recommendation of the
Mid-America
board that
Mid-Americas
shareholders approve the merger agreement,
Mid-Americas
failure to hold a shareholders meeting to vote on the
merger agreement,
Mid-Americas
authorization, recommendation or proposal of a third party
acquisition proposal or if the merger agreement is otherwise
terminated (other than by
Mid-America
for Pinnacles material breach) after
Mid-America
shall have received a third party acquisition proposal,
Mid-America
may be required to pay a termination fee to Pinnacle of
$8 million. The purpose of the termination fee is to
encourage the commitment of
Mid-America
to the merger, and to compensate Pinnacle if
Mid-America
engages in certain conduct which would make the merger less
likely to occur. The effect of the termination fee likely will
be to discourage other companies from seeking to acquire or
merge with
Mid-America
prior to completion of the merger and could cause
Mid-America
to reject any acquisition proposal from a third party which does
not take into account the termination fee.
We
May Amend the Terms of the Merger and Waive Rights Under the
Merger Agreement (Page 87)
We may jointly amend the terms of the merger agreement, and
either party may waive its right to require the other party to
adhere to any of those terms, to the extent legally permissible.
However, after the approval of the merger agreement by the
respective shareholders of Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
no amendment or waiver
12
that reduces or changes the form of the consideration that will
be received by
Mid-America
shareholders may be accomplished without the further approval of
such shareholders.
Pinnacle
Will Account for the Merger Using the Purchase
Method (Page 56)
Pinnacle will account for the merger as a purchase for financial
reporting purposes.
Dissenters
Rights (Page 55)
Tennessee law permits
Mid-America
shareholders to dissent from the merger and to have the fair
value of their stock paid in cash. To do this, a
Mid-America
shareholders must follow certain procedures, including filing
certain notices with
Mid-America
and refraining from voting the shareholders shares in
favor of the merger. If a
Mid-America
shareholder properly dissents from the merger, that
shareholders shares of
Mid-America
common stock will not be exchanged for shares of Pinnacle common
stock in the merger, and that shareholders only right will
be to receive the appraised value of the shareholders
shares in cash. For a complete description of these
dissenters rights, see page 55 and
Appendix B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
where the full text of the Tennessee Dissenters Rights
Statute is set out.
Comparison
of the Rights of
Mid-America
Shareholders and Pinnacle Shareholders (Page 93)
Both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
are incorporated under Tennessee law.
Mid-America
shareholders, upon completion of the merger will become Pinnacle
shareholders, and their rights as such will be governed by
Pinnacles charter and bylaws. See COMPARISON OF THE
RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS beginning on page 93 for the
material differences between the rights of
Mid-America
shareholders and Pinnacle shareholders.
Board
of Directors After the Merger (Page 57)
After the merger, the board of directors of the combined company
is expected to have at least 16 members, consisting of 13
current members of Pinnacles board of directors and three
members of the existing
Mid-America
board of directors who are proposed by the nominating and
corporate governance committee of
Mid-Americas
board of directors and are reasonably acceptable to
Pinnacles nominating and corporate governance committee
and board of directors.
Pinnacle
2004 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment (Page 108)
The Pinnacle board of directors is seeking to amend
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the
number of shares of Pinnacle common stock reserved for issuance
under the Plan by 500,000. As of the date hereof, there were
1,269,018 shares reserved for issuance under the 2004
Equity Incentive Plan, including outstanding awards. If the
amendment is approved, there will be a total of
1,769,018 shares of Pinnacle common stock reserved for
issuance under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
Pinnacles board believes that the increase in the number
of shares available for awards under the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan is appropriate to allow for the continued practice of
awarding equity incentives to a broad-based group of
Pinnacles associates which will include
Mid-Americas
associates.
Pinnacle
Shareholder Meeting to be Held on November 27, 2007
(Page 35)
The Pinnacle special meeting will be held at 211 Commerce
Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee 37201 on
November 27, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., local time. At the
special meeting, Pinnacle shareholders will be asked:
1. to approve the merger agreement between Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger;
2. to vote upon an adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies;
13
3. to approve an amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of Pinnacle
common stock reserved for issuance thereunder by
500,000 shares; and
4. to transact any other business as may properly be
brought before the special meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting.
You can vote at the Pinnacle special meeting if you owned
Pinnacle common stock at the close of business on
October 9, 2007. On that date, there were
15,553,037 shares of Pinnacle common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote, approximately 9.39% of which were owned and
entitled to be voted by Pinnacle directors and executive
officers and their affiliates. You can cast one vote for each
share of Pinnacle common stock you owned on that date. The
approval of the merger agreement with
Mid-America
and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of Pinnacles outstanding shares. Approval of the
proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting, if necessary,
requires that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal
exceed the number of votes cast opposing the proposal. The
amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan will be
approved if the number of shares of Pinnacle common stock voted
in favor of the amendment exceed the votes cast opposing the
action.
Mid-America
Shareholder Meeting to be Held on November 27, 2007
(Page 38)
The
Mid-America
special meeting will be held at Bank of the Souths office
at 551 North Mt. Juliet Road, Mt. Juliet, Tennessee 37122, at
10:00 a.m., on November 27, 2007, local time. At the
special meeting,
Mid-America
shareholders will be asked:
1. to approve the merger agreement between Pinnacle and
Mid-America; and
2. to vote upon an adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional
proxies; and
3. to transact any other business as may properly be
brought before the special meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting.
You can vote at the
Mid-America
special meeting if you owned
Mid-America
common stock at the close of business on October 9, 2007.
On that date, there were 14,229,523 shares of
Mid-America
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, approximately
12.54% of which were owned and entitled to be voted by
Mid-America
directors and executive officers and their affiliates. You can
cast one vote for each share of
Mid-America
common stock you owned on that date. In order to approve the
merger agreement, the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of
Mid-America
common stock entitled to vote must vote in favor of the merger.
Approval of the proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting, if
necessary, requires that the number of votes cast in favor of
the proposal exceed the number of votes cast opposing the
proposal.
14
RISK
FACTORS RELATING TO THE MERGER
In addition to the other information contained in or
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including without limitation,
Pinnacles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006,
Pinnacles Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2007, respectively.
Mid-Americas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and
Mid-Americas
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007 and
June 30, 2007, respectively, you should carefully consider
the following risk factors in deciding whether to vote to
approve the merger agreement and, in the case of the Pinnacle
shareholders, the stock issuance in connection with the
merger.
The
Value of Pinnacle Shares Received Will Fluctuate; Shareholders
of
Mid-America
May Receive More or Less Value Depending on Fluctuations In the
Price of Pinnacle Common Stock
The number of shares of Pinnacle common stock issued to
Mid-America
shareholders in exchange for each share of
Mid-America
common stock is fixed. The market prices of Pinnacle common
stock and
Mid-America
common stock when the merger is completed may vary from their
market prices at the date of this document and at the date of
the special meetings of Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
Because the exchange ratio will not be adjusted to reflect any
changes in the market value of Pinnacle common stock, the market
value of Pinnacle common stock issued in the merger may be
higher or lower than the value of such shares on earlier dates.
If the price of Pinnacle common stock declines prior to
completion of the merger, the value of the merger consideration
to be received by
Mid-Americas
shareholders will decrease.
Mid-America
has the right to terminate the merger agreement if
Pinnacles average closing stock price over a
ten-day
period prior to and ending on the eighth day before the closing
is less than $18.00 and the quotient resulting from dividing
Pinnacles average closing stock price for that same
ten-day period by the average closing price for Pinnacles
common stock for the
ten-day
period prior to and ending on August 15, 2007 ($25.095) is
less than the difference between (1) the quotient resulting
from dividing the Nasdaq Bank Index on the eighth day prior to
the closing of the merger by the Nasdaq Bank Index on
August 15, 2007 (2,874.37) and (2) 0.25. During the
12-month
period ending on October 9, 2007, the most recent practical
date prior to the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
Pinnacle common stock traded in a range from a low of $21.62 to
a high of $35.97 and ended that period at $30.62, and
Mid-America
common stock traded in a range from a low of $11.00 to a high of
$15.00 and ended that period at $11.65. See COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICES beginning on page 33 for more detailed
share price information.
These variations may be the result of various factors, many of
which are beyond the control of Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the business, operations or prospects of Pinnacle,
Mid-America
or the combined company;
|
|
|
|
governmental
and/or
litigation developments
and/or
regulatory considerations;
|
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when the merger will be
consummated and the anticipated benefits of the merger;
|
|
|
|
governmental action affecting the banking and financial industry
generally;
|
|
|
|
market assessments of the potential integration or other
costs; and
|
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions.
|
The merger may not be completed until a significant period of
time has passed after the Pinnacle and
Mid-America
special shareholder meetings. At the time of their respective
special meetings, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
shareholders will not know the exact value of the Pinnacle
common stock that will be issued in connection with the merger.
Shareholders of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
are urged to obtain current market quotations for Pinnacle
common stock, and they may obtain such a quotation from a
newspaper, the Internet or by calling their broker. Shares of
Mid-America
are not listed or traded on a national exchange or
over-the-counter. Based on
15
information known to
Mid-America
senior management, the only price paid for shares of
Mid-America
common stock during the week ended August 14, 2007 (the day
prior to the signing of the merger agreement) was $12.25 per
share on August 8, 2007. The price of Pinnacle common stock
and
Mid-America
common stock at the effective time of the merger may vary from
their prices on the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The historical prices of Pinnacle common
stock and
Mid-America
common stock included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
may not be indicative of their prices on the date the merger
becomes effective. The future market prices of Pinnacle common
stock and
Mid-America
common stock cannot be guaranteed or predicted.
Pinnacle
May Not Be Able To Successfully Integrate
Mid-America
or To Realize the Anticipated Benefits of the Merger
The merger involves the combination of two bank holding
companies that previously have operated independently and in the
case of
Mid-America,
two separate bank subsidiaries that operate separate from one
another. A successful combination of the operations of the three
bank subsidiaries will depend substantially on Pinnacles
ability to consolidate operations, systems and procedures and to
eliminate redundancies and costs. Pinnacle may not be able to
combine the operations of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
without encountering difficulties, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the loss of key employees and customers;
|
|
|
|
the disruption of operations and business;
|
|
|
|
inability to maintain and increase competitive presence;
|
|
|
|
loan and deposit attrition, customer loss and revenue loss;
|
|
|
|
possible inconsistencies in standards, control procedures and
policies;
|
|
|
|
unexpected problems with costs, operations, personnel,
technology and credit; and/or
|
|
|
|
problems with the assimilation of new operations, sites or
personnel, which could divert resources from regular banking
operations.
|
Additionally, general market and economic conditions or
governmental actions affecting the financial industry generally
may inhibit the successful integration of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and their respective bank subsidiaries.
Further, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
entered into the merger agreement with the expectation that the
merger will result in various benefits including, among other
things, benefits relating to enhanced revenues, a strengthened
market position for the combined company, cross selling
opportunities, technology, cost savings and operating
efficiencies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the merger
is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether
Pinnacle integrates
Mid-America
and its bank subsidiaries in an efficient and effective manner,
and general competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to
achieve these anticipated benefits could result in a reduction
in the price of Pinnacles shares as well as in increased
costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and
diversion of managements time and energy and could
materially impact Pinnacles business, financial condition
and operating results. Finally, any cost savings that are
realized may be offset by losses in revenues or other charges to
earnings.
Mid-America
Shareholders Will Have a Reduced Ownership and Voting Interest
After the Merger and Will Exercise Less Influence Over
Management
After the mergers completion,
Mid-America
shareholders will own a significantly smaller percentage of
Pinnacle than they currently own of
Mid-America.
Following completion of the merger,
Mid-America
shareholders will own approximately 30% of the combined company
on a fully-diluted basis. Additionally, former
Mid-America
directors initially will hold only three of the sixteen expected
seats on Pinnacles board. Consequently,
Mid-America
shareholders likely will be able to exercise less influence over
the management and policies of Pinnacle than they currently
exercise over the management and policies of
Mid-America.
16
The
Combined Company Will Incur Significant Transaction and
Merger-Related Costs in Connection With the Merger
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
expect to incur significant costs associated with combining the
operations of the two companies. Pinnacle and
Mid-America
have just recently begun collecting information in order to
formulate detailed integration plans to deliver anticipated cost
savings. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the
integration of the businesses of Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
Although Pinnacle and
Mid-America
expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the
realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of
the businesses, may offset incremental transaction and
merger-related costs over time, this net benefit may not be
achieved in the near term, or at all.
Whether or not the merger is consummated, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will incur substantial expenses, such as legal, accounting and
financial advisory fees, in pursuing the merger. Completion of
the merger is conditioned upon the receipt of all material
governmental authorizations, consents, orders and approvals,
including approval by federal banking regulators. Pinnacle and
Mid-America
intend to pursue all required approvals in accordance with the
merger agreement. See THE MERGER AGREEMENT
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger beginning on
page 80 for a discussion of the conditions to the
completion of the merger and PROPOSAL #1 FOR
SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: THE PROPOSED MERGER Regulatory
Approval beginning on page 59 for a description of
the regulatory approvals that must be received in connection
with the merger.
Directors
and Officers of
Mid-America
Have Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Merger
Certain of
Mid-Americas
existing directors and officers have interests in the merger
that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of
Mid-America
shareholders generally. For example, certain
Mid-America
executive officers have agreements that provide for significant
payments following consummation of the merger. The merger will
be considered a change in control for purposes of these
agreements. These agreements were amended on August 15,
2007, to provide that if the merger is consummated in 2007, the
executives will be paid their change in control payments under
these agreements and as if the merger occurred on
January 1, 2008. In addition, all outstanding options,
stock appreciation rights and restricted shares of Mid-America,
including these held by directors and executive officers, will
vest upon consummation of the merger. See PROPOSAL #1
FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: THE PROPOSED MERGER Interests of
Certain
Mid-America
Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger beginning
on page 56.
In addition, Jason K. West, PrimeTrusts President and
Chief Operating Officer, has executed an employment agreement
with Pinnacle National Bank that provides Mr. West with
payment for services provided to Pinnacle National Bank as well
as, in some instances, payments upon a change in control of
Pinnacle or Pinnacle National Bank. This agreement may create a
potential conflict of interest for Mr. West. In addition,
Pinnacle agreed in the merger agreement to indemnify and provide
liability insurance to
Mid-Americas
officers and directors. These and certain other additional
interests of
Mid-Americas
directors and officers may cause some of these persons to view
the proposed transaction differently than you view it. For more
information about these interests, please see
PROPOSAL #1 FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL
PARTNERS, INC. AND
MID- AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: THE PROPOSED MERGER Interests of
Certain
Mid-America
Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger beginning
on page 56.
Also, each of Gary Scott, David Major, Jason West and Sam Short
has entered into a business protection agreement with
Mid-America.
Under the terms of these agreements, each of Messrs. Scott,
Major, West and Short has agreed that he will not actively
participate or engage directly or indirectly in a competing
business in the Nashville MSA and the counties contiguous to the
Nashville MSA until the earlier of (1) voluntary retirement
after reaching age 65; (2) a transaction in which an
acquiror of
Mid-America
is subsequently acquired; (3) August 31, 2011; or
(4) the date that
Mid-America
terminates the agreement. In exchange for this agreement not to
compete, each executive is entitled to receive monthly payments
equal to the greater of his current or future monthly base
salary or $10,000 until the occurrence of one of these
termination events.
17
Mr. Wests business protection agreement will be
superseded by his employment agreement with Pinnacle National
Bank upon the effectiveness of the merger.
The
Opinion Obtained by
Mid-America
From its Financial Advisor Will Not Reflect Changes in
Circumstances Prior to the Merger
On August 15, 2007, Hovde delivered to the
Mid-America
board its oral opinion (which was confirmed in writing on
August 15, 2007) as to the fairness from a financial
point of view to
Mid-America
and the shareholders of
Mid-America,
as of that date, of the aggregate merger consideration to be
received by them under the merger agreement. A copy of this
opinion is attached hereto as Appendix D. The
opinion does not reflect changes that may occur or may have
occurred after the date of such opinion, to the operations and
prospects of Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
general market and economic conditions and other factors. As a
result of the foregoing,
Mid-America
shareholders should be aware that the opinion of Hovde attached
hereto does not address the fairness of the aggregate merger
consideration at any time other than as of August 15, 2007.
Failure
To Complete the Merger Could Cause Pinnacles or
Mid-Americas
Stock Price To Decline
If the merger is not completed for any reason, Pinnacles
or
Mid-Americas
stock price may decline because costs related to the merger,
such as legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, must be
paid even if the merger is not completed. In addition, if the
merger is not completed, Pinnacles or
Mid-Americas
stock price may decline to the extent that the current market
price reflects a market assumption that the merger will be
completed.
Risks
Related to Pinnacles Business
For risks related to Pinnacles business, please see
Pinnacles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 and its
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007, each of which is incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Risks
Related to
Mid-Americas
Business
For risks related to
Mid-Americas
business, please see
Mid-Americas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended
March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, each of which is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/
prospectus.
18
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus including the Appendices
hereto contains forward-looking statements about
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and the combined company following the merger.
Forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), are statements that represent our judgment
concerning the future and are subject to risks and uncertainties
that could cause our actual operating results and financial
position to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. Such forward-looking statements can generally be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
may, project, will,
expect, anticipate,
estimate, believe, or
continue, or the negative thereof or other
variations thereof or comparable terminology. You should note
that the discussion of Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
reasons for the merger and the description of the opinion of
Mid-Americas
financial advisor contain many forward-looking statements that
describe beliefs, assumptions and estimates of the management of
each of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle and public sources as of the indicated dates and
those forward-looking expectations may have changed as of the
date of this joint proxy statement/ prospectus. In addition, any
statements that refer to expectations, projections or other
characterizations of future events or circumstances, including
any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements.
Those statements are not guarantees and are subject to risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely
from these forward-looking statements.
The ability of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
to predict results or the actual effects of the combined
companys plans and strategies is inherently uncertain.
Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from
anticipated results. Some of the factors that may cause actual
results to differ materially from those contemplated by the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the
RISK FACTORS RELATING TO THE MERGER discussed
immediately above as well as the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining required shareholder and regulatory
approvals for the merger and related transactions;
|
|
|
|
the level and timeliness of realization, if any, of expected
cost savings from the merger;
|
|
|
|
difficulties related to the consummation of the merger and the
integration of the businesses of Pinnacle and
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
a materially adverse change in the financial condition of
Pinnacle or
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
greater than expected deposit attrition, customer loss, or
revenue loss following the merger;
|
|
|
|
loan losses that exceed the level of allowance for loan losses
of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
lower than expected revenue following the merger;
|
|
|
|
management of the combined companys growth;
|
|
|
|
the risks inherent or associated with possible or completed
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
increases in competitive pressure in the banking industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in the interest rate environment that reduce margins;
|
|
|
|
changes in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines;
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally, in Tennessee or
in the Nashville MSA, that are less favorable than expected
resulting in, among other things, a deterioration of the quality
of the combined companys loan portfolio and the demand for
its products and services;
|
|
|
|
dependence on key personnel;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
changes in business conditions and inflation; and
|
|
|
|
changes in the securities markets.
|
Additional factors are discussed in the reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, by Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
See WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION on
page 133.
The above list is not intended to be exhaustive and there may be
other factors that would preclude us from realizing the
predictions made in the forward-looking statements. Because
forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions and
uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Pinnacle shareholders and
Mid-America
shareholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
statements, which speak only as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or the date of any document incorporated by
reference.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
concerning the merger or other matters addressed in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and attributable to Pinnacle or
Mid-America
or any person acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in
their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or
referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by
applicable law or regulation, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
Selected
Historical Financial Data
The following tables present selected historical financial data
for Pinnacle as of and for each of the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and as of and
for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. In
addition, the tables present selected historical financial data
for
Mid-America,
or its predecessors, as of and for each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 2006 and as of and for
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006.
Pinnacle
Financial Partners, Inc. Selected Historical Financial
Data
Set forth below is selected consolidated financial data for
Pinnacle as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002
and for the years then ended, and Pinnacles unaudited
consolidated financial data as of and for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006. Except for the data under
Performance Ratios and Other Data and Asset
Quality Ratios, the summary historical consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003
and 2002 and for the years then ended is derived from
Pinnacles audited consolidated financial statements, which
were audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm. The summary historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2006, is derived from unaudited consolidated
financial statements for those periods. The results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full
year or any other interim period. Pinnacle prepared the
unaudited information on the same basis as it prepared its
audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of
Pinnacle, this information reflects all adjustments, consisting
of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of this data for those dates. This information
should be read together with Pinnacles consolidated
financial statements and related notes and Managements
Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in Pinnacles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Pinnacles
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which are incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
20
Selected
Historical Condensed Financial Data of Pinnacle Financial
Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data, ratios and
percentages)
|
|
|
Statement of Financial Condition
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,315,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,985,625
|
|
|
$
|
2,142,187
|
|
|
$
|
1,016,772
|
|
|
$
|
727,139
|
|
|
$
|
498,421
|
|
|
$
|
305,279
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
1,645,655
|
|
|
|
1,358,273
|
|
|
|
1,497,735
|
|
|
|
648,024
|
|
|
|
472,362
|
|
|
|
297,004
|
|
|
|
209,743
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(17,375
|
)
|
|
|
(14,686
|
)
|
|
|
(16,118
|
)
|
|
|
(7,858
|
)
|
|
|
(5,650
|
)
|
|
|
(3,719
|
)
|
|
|
(2,677
|
)
|
Total securities
|
|
|
339,781
|
|
|
|
305,643
|
|
|
|
346,494
|
|
|
|
279,089
|
|
|
|
208,170
|
|
|
|
139,944
|
|
|
|
73,980
|
|
Goodwill and core deposit
intangibles
|
|
|
124,641
|
|
|
|
115,835
|
|
|
|
125,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
1,937,979
|
|
|
|
1,664,265
|
|
|
|
1,763,427
|
|
|
|
875,985
|
|
|
|
602,655
|
|
|
|
405,619
|
|
|
|
249,067
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
26,699
|
|
|
|
33,749
|
|
|
|
53,726
|
|
|
|
41,500
|
|
|
|
53,500
|
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
21,500
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
51,548
|
|
|
|
30,929
|
|
|
|
51,548
|
|
|
|
30,929
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
265,194
|
|
|
|
238,739
|
|
|
|
256,017
|
|
|
|
63,436
|
|
|
|
57,880
|
|
|
|
34,336
|
|
|
|
32,404
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
69,247
|
|
|
|
45,115
|
|
|
|
109,696
|
|
|
|
46,308
|
|
|
|
27,679
|
|
|
|
18,262
|
|
|
|
12,561
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
34,504
|
|
|
|
18,713
|
|
|
|
48,743
|
|
|
|
17,270
|
|
|
|
7,415
|
|
|
|
5,363
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
34,743
|
|
|
|
26,402
|
|
|
|
60,953
|
|
|
|
29,038
|
|
|
|
20,264
|
|
|
|
12,899
|
|
|
|
8,199
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
33,056
|
|
|
|
24,308
|
|
|
|
57,221
|
|
|
|
26,886
|
|
|
|
17,316
|
|
|
|
11,742
|
|
|
|
7,261
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
10,577
|
|
|
|
6,428
|
|
|
|
15,786
|
|
|
|
5,394
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
27,608
|
|
|
|
20,434
|
|
|
|
46,624
|
|
|
|
21,032
|
|
|
|
14,803
|
|
|
|
10,796
|
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
16,025
|
|
|
|
10,302
|
|
|
|
26,383
|
|
|
|
11,248
|
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
|
|
3,981
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
8,456
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,028
|
|
|
$
|
6,934
|
|
|
$
|
17,927
|
|
|
$
|
8,055
|
|
|
$
|
5,319
|
|
|
$
|
2,555
|
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding basic
|
|
|
15,464,151
|
|
|
|
12,473,187
|
|
|
|
13,954,077
|
|
|
|
8,408,663
|
|
|
|
7,750,943
|
|
|
|
7,384,106
|
|
|
|
6,108,942
|
|
Earnings per share
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding diluted:
|
|
|
16,640,977
|
|
|
|
13,640,565
|
|
|
|
15,156,837
|
|
|
|
9,464,500
|
|
|
|
8,698,139
|
|
|
|
7,876,006
|
|
|
|
6,236,844
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of
period
|
|
|
15,545,581
|
|
|
|
15,370,916
|
|
|
|
15,446,074
|
|
|
|
8,426,551
|
|
|
|
8,389,232
|
|
|
|
7,384,106
|
|
|
|
7,384,106
|
|
Performance Ratios and Other
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(2)
|
|
|
1.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Return on average
stockholders equity(2)
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.48
|
%
|
|
|
8.66
|
%
|
|
|
13.23
|
%
|
|
|
12.31
|
%
|
|
|
7.70
|
%
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
Net interest margin(3)
|
|
|
3.61
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
Net interest spread(4)
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
3.34
|
%
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
Noninterest income to average
assets(2)
|
|
|
0.97
|
%
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
Noninterest expense to average
assets(2)
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio(5)
|
|
|
60.9
|
%
|
|
|
62.2
|
%
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
|
|
61.1
|
%
|
|
|
58.6
|
%
|
|
|
67.8
|
%
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
Average loan to average deposit
ratio
|
|
|
94.48
|
%
|
|
|
87.12
|
%
|
|
|
88.73
|
%
|
|
|
81.3
|
%
|
|
|
79.0
|
%
|
|
|
85.5
|
%
|
|
|
98.5
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
119.75
|
%
|
|
|
125.30
|
%
|
|
|
122.10
|
%
|
|
|
120.0
|
%
|
|
|
120.0
|
%
|
|
|
118.9
|
%
|
|
|
119.6
|
%
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
17.06
|
|
|
$
|
15.53
|
|
|
$
|
16.57
|
|
|
$
|
7.53
|
|
|
$
|
6.90
|
|
|
$
|
4.65
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to non
performing assets
|
|
|
564.3
|
%
|
|
|
512.1
|
%
|
|
|
199.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,708.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,006.9
|
%
|
|
|
981.3
|
%
|
|
|
143.4
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total
loans
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
Non performing assets to total
assets
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries)
to average loans(2)
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage(6)
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
21
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information for 2006 fiscal year includes the operations of
Calvary Bancorp, Inc., which Pinnacle merged with on
March 15, 2006 and reflects approximately 6.9 million
shares of Pinnacle common stock issued in connection with that
merger. |
|
(2) |
|
Ratios and data for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2006, are annualized. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin is the result of net interest income on a
tax equivalent basis for the period divided by average interest
earning assets. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest spread is the result of the difference between the
interest yield earned on interest earning assets on a tax
equivalent basis less the interest paid on interest bearing
liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
Efficiency ratio is the result of noninterest expense divided by
the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. |
|
(6) |
|
Leverage ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by
average total assets for the fourth quarter of each year in the
case of the full year data and for the second quarter in the
case of the June 30 data. |
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc. Selected Historical Financial
Data
Set forth below is selected consolidated financial data for
Mid-America
(or its predecessors) as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004,
2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and
Mid-Americas
(or, prior to September 1, 2006, PrimeTrust) unaudited
consolidated financial data as of and for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006. Except for the data under
Ratios, the summary historical consolidated
financial data as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003
and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,
2004, 2003 and 2002 is derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements, which were audited by Maggart and
Associates, P.C., an independent registered public
accounting firm. The summary historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2006, is derived from unaudited consolidated
financial statements for those periods. The results of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full
year or any other interim period.
Mid-America
prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as it
prepared its audited consolidated financial statements. In the
opinion of
Mid-America,
this information reflects all adjustments, consisting of only
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation
of this data for those dates. This information should be read
together with
Mid-Americas
consolidated financial statements and related notes and
Managements Discussions and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in
Mid-Americas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
Mid-Americas
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which are incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
22
Selected
Historical Condensed Financial Data of
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data, ratios and
percentages)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,069,363
|
|
|
$
|
472,814
|
|
|
$
|
967,971
|
|
|
$
|
419,302
|
|
|
$
|
295,290
|
|
|
$
|
203,227
|
|
|
$
|
109,426
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
764,690
|
|
|
|
328,586
|
|
|
|
686,690
|
|
|
|
301,878
|
|
|
|
226,486
|
|
|
|
154,102
|
|
|
|
76,023
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
176,101
|
|
|
|
92,406
|
|
|
|
168,395
|
|
|
|
64,035
|
|
|
|
44,134
|
|
|
|
35,125
|
|
|
|
25,073
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
9,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
904,665
|
|
|
|
410,402
|
|
|
|
823,755
|
|
|
|
359,037
|
|
|
|
262,567
|
|
|
|
178,921
|
|
|
|
97,378
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
104,676
|
|
|
|
39,320
|
|
|
|
102,940
|
|
|
|
38,412
|
|
|
|
20,158
|
|
|
|
16,980
|
|
|
|
10,307
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
15,092
|
|
|
|
42,330
|
|
|
|
21,809
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
7,986
|
|
|
|
3,942
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19,339
|
|
|
|
7,635
|
|
|
|
22,033
|
|
|
|
9,345
|
|
|
|
4,878
|
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
15,707
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
20,297
|
|
|
|
12,464
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses
|
|
|
15,107
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
19,024
|
|
|
|
11,343
|
|
|
|
7,389
|
|
|
|
3,208
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
5,355
|
|
|
|
3,981
|
|
|
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
14,502
|
|
|
|
7,999
|
|
|
|
21,304
|
|
|
|
12,653
|
|
|
|
9,337
|
|
|
|
6,585
|
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
4,566
|
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
|
(1,501
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,137
|
|
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
|
$
|
2,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,501
|
)
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
Book value per common share, end
of period
|
|
$
|
7.51
|
|
|
$
|
5.79
|
|
|
$
|
7.39
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
4.15
|
|
|
$
|
4.21
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average
stockholders equity(2)
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
|
|
8.39
|
%
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
(8.51
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.95
|
)%
|
Return on average assets(2)
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
(0.91
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.97
|
)%
|
Average stockholders equity
to average assets(2)
|
|
|
9.96
|
%
|
|
|
8.32
|
%
|
|
|
8.75
|
%
|
|
|
8.73
|
%
|
|
|
7.10
|
%
|
|
|
10.74
|
%
|
|
|
12.35
|
%
|
Net interest margin(3)
|
|
|
3.37
|
%
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
Net interest spread(4)
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
3.24
|
%
|
|
|
3.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio(5)
|
|
|
70.8
|
%
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
|
|
79.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
82.1
|
%
|
|
|
106.8
|
%
|
|
|
132.6
|
%
|
Leverage ratio(6)
|
|
|
10.21
|
%
|
|
|
12.02
|
%
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
9.81
|
%
|
|
|
8.69
|
%
|
|
|
8.93
|
%
|
|
|
9.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information for 2006 includes the operations of Bank of the
South for the period from September 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006. All periods prior to September 1,
2006 relate solely to PrimeTrust Bank and do not reflect the
results of Bank of the South prior to that time. |
|
(2) |
|
Ratios for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2006 are annualized. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin is the result of net interest income for the
period divided by average interest earning assets. |
23
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Net interest spread is the result of the difference between the
interest yield earned on interest earning assets less the
interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
Efficiency ratio is the result of noninterest expense divided by
the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. |
|
(6) |
|
Leverage ratio is defined as Tier 1 capital divided by
average total assets for the fourth quarter of each year in the
case of the full year data and for the second quarter in the
case of June 30 data. |
Selected
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of June 30, 2007, and the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
six-months ended June 30, 2007 and for the year ended
December 31, 2006, have been prepared to reflect the
proposed merger of Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet is
presented as if the merger occurred on June 30, 2007, while
the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of
operations are presented as if the merger occurred on
January 1, 2006. The unaudited pro forma acquisition
adjustments, including those to adjust
Mid-Americas
net assets to fair value, are preliminary and subject to change
as additional analyses are performed and as additional
information becomes available.
The unaudited pro forma financial data set forth below is not
necessarily indicative of results that would have actually been
achieved if the merger transaction had been consummated as of
the date indicated, or that may be achieved in the future. This
information should be read in conjunction with the historical
consolidated financial statements of each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
(and the related notes to these statements), which are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION beginning on page 133.
Pinnacle anticipates that the merger will provide the combined
company with some future financial benefits that include reduced
operating expenses. However, Pinnacle does not reflect any of
the anticipated cost savings in the following pro forma
financial information. Therefore, the pro forma financial
information, while helpful in illustrating the financial
characteristics of the combined company under the assumptions
set forth below, does not attempt to predict or suggest future
results. The pro forma financial information does not attempt to
show how the combined company would have actually performed had
the companies been combined throughout the periods presented.
24
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amount data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
106,002
|
|
|
$
|
42,741
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
(9,905
|
)
|
|
$
|
149,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
(21,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity
|
|
|
27,068
|
|
|
|
9,740
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
27,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
(9,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
|
312,713
|
|
|
|
176,101
|
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
|
|
498,342
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,973
|
|
|
|
8,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,967
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
1,663,030
|
|
|
|
772,927
|
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
|
|
2,431,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
(3,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(17,375
|
)
|
|
|
(8,237
|
)
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
(25,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
1,645,655
|
|
|
|
764,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406,814
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
114,288
|
|
|
|
19,147
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
131,356
|
|
|
|
243,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
(19,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
3,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
(6,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
10,353
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
|
20,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
9,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
37,855
|
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
68,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
56,420
|
|
|
|
12,076
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
69,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
(3,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,315,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,321
|
|
|
$
|
3,496,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,797,536
|
|
|
$
|
904,665
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
$
|
1,719
|
|
|
$
|
2,703,920
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
46,699
|
|
|
|
32,325
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
78,007
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase
|
|
|
140,443
|
|
|
|
18,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,738
|
|
Subordinated debentures and other
borrowings
|
|
|
51,548
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
32,585
|
|
|
|
87,633
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
13,906
|
|
|
|
5,902
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
(4,335
|
)
|
|
|
19,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,050,132
|
|
|
$
|
964,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,958
|
|
|
$
|
3,047,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
15,546
|
|
|
|
13,933
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
(13,933
|
)
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
6,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
212,923
|
|
|
|
87,919
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
(87,919
|
)
|
|
|
389,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
176,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
42,137
|
|
|
|
5,023
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
(9,014
|
)
|
|
|
42,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
(loss)
|
|
|
(5,411
|
)
|
|
|
(2,199
|
)
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
(5,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
265,195
|
|
|
|
104,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,363
|
|
|
|
448,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,315,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,321
|
|
|
$
|
3,496,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
(A) |
|
To reflect the impact to
Mid-Americas
consolidated statement of financial condition for the impact of
merger related charges to be recognized by
Mid-America
prior to consummation of the merger. It is estimated that
$2.3 million of the cash payments made to certain
Mid-America
employees will not be tax deductible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,905
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
|
(B) |
|
To reflect the impact of the issuance of Pinnacle common stock
for outstanding common stock of
Mid-
America at the 0.4655 exchange ratio. As the exchange ratio is
fixed pursuant to the merger agreement, the value of the shares
to be issued by Pinnacle to
Mid-America
shareholders upon consummation of the merger are valued in
accordance with EITF
99-12,
Determination of the Measurement Date for the
Market Price of Acquiror Securities Issued in a Purchase
Business Combination. Other components of the purchase
price consideration are estimated costs directly attributable to
the merger to be incurred by Pinnacle of $825,000 and the
estimated fair value of options to acquire Pinnacle common stock
to be issued to holders of options to acquire
Mid-America
common stock and the estimated fair value of stock appreciation
rights to acquire Pinnacle common stock to be issued to holders
of similar rights to acquire
Mid-America
common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. The fair value of
the exchange options and stock appreciation rights was estimated
using the Black-Scholes method. |
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Mid-America
shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,933,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Mid-America
restricted shares that automatically vest on the merger date
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Mid-America
shares exchanged
|
|
|
14,193,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange ratio to Pinnacle shares
|
|
|
x 46.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Pinnacle shares to exchange
|
|
|
6,606,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price of Pinnacle shares used for merger
|
|
x$
|
26.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Pinnacle common stock exchanged for
Mid-America
common stock
|
|
$
|
173,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mid-America shares exchanged
|
|
|
14,193,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration price per
Mid-America
common share
|
|
x $
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of cash consideration for
Mid-America
common stock
|
|
$
|
21,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock and cash consideration
|
|
$
|
194,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus:
Mid-America
goodwill and core deposit intangible
|
|
|
23,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Mid-America
stockholders equity
|
|
|
(104,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expenses in (A) above
|
|
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
122,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Mid-America
options outstanding
|
|
|
1,170,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange ratio to Pinnacle shares
|
|
|
x 46.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Pinnacle options to exchange
|
|
|
544,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of each Pinnacle option
|
|
x $
|
14.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of Pinnacle options
|
|
$
|
7,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Mid-America
stock appreciation rights outstanding
|
|
|
35,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange ratio to Pinnacle shares
|
|
|
x 46.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Pinnacle stock appreciation rights to exchange
|
|
|
16,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of each Pinnacle stock appreciation right
|
|
x $
|
13.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of Pinnacle stock appreciation rights
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees incurred by Pinnacle
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill before fair value adjustments
|
|
$
|
131,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
131,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (deferred tax assets associated with
Mid-America
core deposit intangible)
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of
Mid-America
|
|
|
13,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital of
Mid-America
|
|
|
87,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings of
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,991
|
|
Other comprehensive loss of
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
Goodwill of
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,147
|
|
Core deposit intangible of
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
Accrued liabilities (investment banking fees)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,290
|
|
Common stock of Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,607
|
|
Additional paid-in capital of Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,632
|
|
27
|
|
|
(C) |
|
To reflect the estimated costs associated with the joint proxy
statement/prospectus which are to be shared equally between
Pinnacle and
Mid-America. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in capital
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
(D) |
|
To adjust
Mid-Americas
loan portfolio and allowance for loan losses for those loans
which Pinnacle does not expect to collect all contractually
required payments on the loan, in accordance with AICPA
Statement of Position
03-3,
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired
in a Transfer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
|
|
(E) |
|
Purchase accounting entry to adjust
Mid-America
net assets to their estimated fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
3,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (deferred income
taxes)
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Federal home Loan
Bank
|
|
|
1,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity investment
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,531
|
|
Bank premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
|
(F) |
|
To reflect the estimated value of core deposit intangible asset
associated with the core deposits of
Mid-America.
For purposes of the pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements, such intangible asset will be amortized using the
sum-of-the-years digit method over a
10-year life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
$
|
9,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (deferred income
taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,921
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
|
(G) |
|
To reflect the settlement of $3,500,000 in holding company
indebtedness and the subsequent issuance of $35,000,000 in trust
preferred securities issued by Pinnacle which would include an
investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary of $1,085,000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (investment in
unconsolidated subsidiaries)
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,585
|
|
|
|
|
(H) |
|
To reflect certain
Mid-America
balance sheet reclassifications to be consistent with
Pinnacles presentation including the reclassification of
Mid-America
net deferred tax liabilities to net deferred tax assets and
reclassification of
Mid-Americas
held-to-maturity investment securities as available-for-sale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities (deferred tax
liabilities)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (deferred tax assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
Investment securities held to
maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
28
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
Mid-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners,
|
|
|
Bancshares,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
69,247
|
|
|
$
|
35,046
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
467
|
|
|
$
|
104,760
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
34,504
|
|
|
|
19,339
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
55,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,743
|
|
|
|
15,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
49,615
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses
|
|
|
33,055
|
|
|
|
15,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
|
|
47,327
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
10,577
|
|
|
|
3,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,538
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
26,576
|
|
|
|
14,098
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
40,698
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
16,024
|
|
|
|
4,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
|
19,553
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
6,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
11,027
|
|
|
$
|
3,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(631
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Fully diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
Weighted average shares (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
13,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
22,071
|
|
Fully diluted
|
|
|
16,641
|
|
|
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
23,512
|
|
29
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
Mid-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners,
|
|
|
Bancshares,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
109,696
|
|
|
$
|
42,330
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
|
$
|
153,634
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
48,743
|
|
|
|
22,033
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
72,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,953
|
|
|
|
20,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
81,276
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
57,221
|
|
|
|
19,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
76,271
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
15,786
|
|
|
|
5,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,141
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
44,841
|
|
|
|
21,043
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
65,896
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
26,383
|
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
28,498
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
8,456
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
8,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
17,927
|
|
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(584
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
Fully diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
Weighted average shares (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
13,954
|
|
|
|
9,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
20,556
|
|
Fully diluted
|
|
|
15,157
|
|
|
|
9,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
22,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(A) Amortization of fair value adjustments for the
following items:
Increase in interest income Accretion of loan
discount
|
|
$
|
467
|
|
|
$
|
1,608
|
|
Decrease in interest expense Amortization of deposit
premium
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
Increase in interest expense Accretion of Federal
Home Loan Bank advances discount
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Increase in noninterest expense Depreciation related
to premises and equipment
write-up
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
(B) Increase in amortization of intangible
assets Amortization of core deposit intangible over
ten year life using the sum of the years digit method
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
(974
|
)
|
(C) Increase in tax expense due to tax impact of A. and B. above
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
(D) Increase in interest expense due to issuance of
$35 million in trust preferred securities at LIBOR plus
300 basis points less the impact of the payoff of
Mid-Americas
line of credit at prime minus 100 basis points.
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
|
(2,669
|
)
|
(E) Decrease in tax expense due to tax impact of interest
expense in D. above.
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
30
Unaudited
Historical and Pro Forma Comparative Share Data
The following table shows comparative per share data about
Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
historical and pro forma net income, cash dividends and book
value. The comparative per share data below provides Pinnacle
and
Mid-America
shareholders with information about the value of their shares
prior to the merger as opposed to the value of their shares
after the merger and once the two companies are combined.
You should not rely on the pro forma information as necessarily
indicative of historical results we would have experienced had
we been combined or of future results we will have after the
merger. In addition, you should not rely on the six-month
information as indicative of results for the entire year.
This information should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited pro forma financial data (and the notes thereto)
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and
the historical consolidated financial statements (and the
related notes to these statements), of Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Selected Unaudited Pro
Forma Consolidated Financial Data above, and WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION beginning on page 133.
The pro forma data in the tables assume that the merger is
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
represents a current estimate based on available information of
the combined companys results of operations. The pro forma
financial adjustments record the assets and liabilities of
Mid-America
at their estimated fair values and are subject to adjustment as
additional information becomes available and as additional
analyses are performed. The significant pro forma assumptions
include (1) that the exchange ratio of Pinnacle common
stock for
Mid-America
common stock is 0.4655, (2) the issuance of
6.6 million shares of Pinnacle common stock valued at
$26.26 per share, (3) the payment of $21.3 million in
cash consideration to the
Mid-America
shareholders, and (4) a core deposit intangible amortized
pursuant to an accelerated method of approximately
$112.9 million to be recorded in accordance with the
purchase method of accounting. Goodwill resulting from the
transaction is approximately $111.3 million, the above
assumptions include no amortization or impairment of this amount.
The pro forma information, while helpful in illustrating the
financial characteristics of the combined company under one set
of assumptions, does not reflect the impact of possible cost
savings, revenue enhancements, expense efficiencies, asset
dispositions and share repurchases, among other factors that may
result as a consequence of the merger and, accordingly, does not
attempt to predict or suggest future results. It also does not
necessarily reflect what the historical results of the combined
company would have been had the companies been combined during
these periods. Upon completion of the merger, the operating
results of
Mid-America
will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of
Pinnacle on a prospective basis.
31
Unaudited
Historical and Pro Forma Per Share Data(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
Combined Pro
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
|
Forma per Share
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
per Share Data(2)
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Net income per share, diluted
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value(3)
|
|
|
17.06
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
|
|
|
19.46
|
|
|
|
9.06
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share, basic
|
|
$
|
1.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Net income per share, diluted
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value(4)
|
|
|
16.59
|
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Combined pro forma per share data and equivalent pro forma per
share data does not reflect anticipated cost savings of
$7.0 million in 2008 and $8.4 million in 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Equivalent pro forma per share data represent the pro forma per
share amounts attributed to one share of
Mid-America
common stock that has been exchanged for stock consideration.
Equivalent pro forma per share amounts are calculated by
multiplying the pro forma combined amounts by the exchange ratio
of 0.4655. |
|
(3) |
|
The pro forma combined book value per share as of June 30,
2007 is calculated as the pro forma combined stockholders
equity at June 30, 2007 divided by the sum of the number of
shares of Pinnacle common stock outstanding at the period ended
June 30, 2007 and the number of shares of Pinnacle common
stock to be issued in conjunction with the acquisition of
Mid-America.
A detail of shares issued and price per share related to the
acquisition of
Mid-America
is included in the section entitled Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information above. |
|
(4) |
|
Book value as of December 31, 2006 is not meaningful (NM)
as purchase accounting adjustments were calculated as of
June 30, 2007. |
32
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICES
Pinnacles common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market under the symbol PNFP and has traded
on that market since July 3, 2006. Prior to that date,
Pinnacle common stock traded on the Nasdaq National Market for
the periods presented. There is no established public trading
market for
Mid-Americas
common stock.
Mid-Americas
management believes that Middle Tennessee is the principal
market area for the
Mid-America
common stock.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the
reported closing sale prices per share for
Mid-America
common stock and Pinnacle common stock on
(i) August 14, 2007, the last trading day before the
public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement,
and (ii) October 9, 2007, the latest practicable date
prior to the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
table also shows in the column entitled Equivalent Price
Per
Mid-America
Share the closing price of a share of Pinnacle common
stock on that date, multiplied by an exchange ratio of 0.4655.
We make no assurance as to what the market price of the Pinnacle
common stock will be when the merger is completed or anytime
thereafter. Because the market value of Pinnacle common stock
will fluctuate after the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, we cannot assure you what value a share of
Pinnacle common stock will have when received by a
Mid-America
shareholder.
Mid-America
shareholders should obtain current stock price quotations for
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
common stock. Such quotations in the case of Pinnacle may be
obtained from a newspaper, the Internet or a broker. In the case
of
Mid-America,
certain of these quotations may be obtained on
Mid-Americas
website (www.mid-americabancsharesinc.com)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
Equivalent Price per
|
|
Date
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Mid-America Share
|
|
|
August 14, 2007
|
|
$
|
25.49
|
|
|
$
|
12.25
|
*
|
|
$
|
11.87
|
|
October 9, 2007
|
|
$
|
30.62
|
|
|
$
|
11.65
|
**
|
|
$
|
14.25
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
For
Mid-America,
August 8, 2007 was the last day, to Mid-Americas
knowledge that a trade was made prior to the announcement of the
merger. |
|
|
|
** |
|
For
Mid-America,
September 7, 2007 was the last day, to Mid-Americas
knowledge, that a trade was made prior to October 9, 2007. |
Pinnacle
Shares
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high
and low sales prices for Pinnacle common stock as reported by
the Nasdaq Global Select Market, or its predecessor the Nasdaq
National Market. Pinnacle has not paid any cash dividends since
inception, and it does not anticipate that it will consider
paying dividends in the near future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
33.85
|
|
|
$
|
29.40
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
31.48
|
|
|
|
28.27
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
31.31
|
|
|
|
21.62
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through October 9, 2007)
|
|
|
30.93
|
|
|
|
28.71
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
28.84
|
|
|
$
|
24.75
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
30.92
|
|
|
|
27.09
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
37.41
|
|
|
|
28.93
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
36.17
|
|
|
|
31.23
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.05
|
|
|
$
|
20.72
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
25.14
|
|
|
|
20.50
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
26.65
|
|
|
|
22.67
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
25.96
|
|
|
|
21.70
|
|
33
As of October 9, 2007, Pinnacle had approximately
1,110 shareholders of record and, additionally,
approximately 3,529 beneficial owners.
Mid-America
Shares
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high
and low sales prices per share of
Mid-America
common stock. The prices indicated for PrimeTrust Bank and Bank
of the South are before the application of the exchange ratios
in the share exchange that resulted in the formation of
Mid-America
of 2-for-1
for PrimeTrust Bank shares and 2.1814-for-1 for Bank of the
South shares. (For periods prior to the September 1, 2006,
the effective date of the share exchange, the information
provided is solely that of the two banks. Prior to that date,
Mid-America
had only 1,000 shares of organizational stock outstanding
and no trades in its shares had occurred.) Certain of the
information included below has been reported to
Mid-America
by certain selling or purchasing shareholders in privately
negotiated transactions during the periods indicated. Although
management believes that the information supplied by purchasers
and sellers concerning their respective transactions is
generally reliable, it has not been verified. This information
may not include all transactions in
Mid-Americas
common stock for the respective periods shown, and it is
possible that transactions occurred during the periods reflected
or discussed at prices higher or lower than the prices set forth
below. Bid price information for
Mid-Americas
common stock is not available. Certain of the transactions
involved, or may have involved,
Mid-America
or its principals.
The trades in the following table indicate reported sales and
purchases since September 1, 2006, when the share exchange
became effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
12.50
|
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter (through October 9, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter (From September 1, 2006)
|
|
$
|
8.76
|
|
|
$
|
8.76
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
The trades in the following table indicate reported sales and
purchases prior to September 1, 2006, for each of Bank of
the South and PrimeTrust Bank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of the South
|
|
|
PrimeTrust Bank
|
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
|
Low Price
|
|
|
High Price
|
|
|
Low Price
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
$
|
24.00
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
21.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter (Through September 1, 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
$
|
21.50
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
25.00
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
The last known trade price of
Mid-Americas
common stock prior to the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus was $11.65 per share. As of
October 9, 2007,
Mid-America
had approximately 3,097 shareholders of record.
34
PINNACLE
SHAREHOLDER MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to
Pinnacle shareholders in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by the Pinnacle board of directors to be used at the
special meeting of Pinnacle shareholders to be held on
November 27, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at 211
Commerce Street, Suite 100, Nashville, Tennessee 37201, and
at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy are
being sent to Pinnacle shareholders on or about October 15,
2007.
Purpose,
Record Date, and Voting
At this special meeting, holders of Pinnacle common stock will
be asked to:
|
|
|
|
|
approve the merger agreement, pursuant to which
Mid-America
will be merged with and into Pinnacle, and the issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
approve the adjournment of the Pinnacle special meeting, if
necessary, to permit Pinnacle to solicit additional proxies if
there are insufficient votes at the special meeting to
constitute a quorum or to approve the merger agreement and the
issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
approve an amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan to increase the number of shares of Pinnacle common stock
reserved for issuance thereunder by 500,000 shares; and
|
|
|
|
transact any other business that may properly come before the
meeting.
|
The Pinnacle board of directors has fixed the close of business
on October 9, 2007 as the record date for determining the
holders of shares of Pinnacle common stock entitled to receive
notice of and to vote at the special meeting. Only holders of
record of shares of Pinnacle common stock at the close of
business on that date will be entitled to vote at the special
meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting.
At the close of business on the record date, there were
15,553,037 shares of Pinnacle common stock outstanding,
held by approximately 1,100 holders of record and 3,529
beneficial owners known to Pinnacle.
Each holder of shares of Pinnacle common stock outstanding on
the record date will be entitled to one vote for each share held
of record upon each matter properly submitted at the special
meeting and at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting.
In order for Pinnacle to satisfy its quorum requirements, the
holders of at least a majority of the total number of
outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock entitled to vote at
the meeting must be present. You will be deemed to be present if
you attend the meeting or if you submit a properly executed
proxy card that is received at or prior to the meeting (and not
revoked).
If your proxy card is properly executed and received by Pinnacle
in time to be voted at the special meeting, the shares
represented by your proxy card will be voted in accordance with
the instructions that you mark on your proxy card. If you
execute your proxy but do not provide Pinnacle with any
instructions, your shares will be voted FOR the
approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger, FOR
approval of the amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan, FOR the adjournment of the special
meeting if necessary and FOR all other matters
described in the notice of the special meeting delivered to
Pinnacle shareholders.
If your shares are held in street name by your
broker or bank and you do not provide your broker or bank with
instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or bank
will not be permitted to vote your shares, which will have the
same effect as a vote against approval of the merger agreement
and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger.
Approval of the merger agreement and related share issuance
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock. Shares as to
which the abstain box is
35
selected on a proxy card will be counted as present for purposes
of determining whether a quorum is present. The required vote
of Pinnacle shareholders on the merger agreement and issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger is based
upon the number of outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock,
and not the number of shares that are actually voted.
Accordingly, the failure to submit a proxy card or to vote in
person at the special meeting or the abstention from voting by
Pinnacle shareholders will have the same effect as an
Against vote with respect to this matter.
The amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan will
be approved if the number of shares of Pinnacle common stock
voted in favor of the proposal exceeds the number of shares of
Pinnacle common stock voted against it. Therefore, abstaining
from voting on the amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
will have no effect on whether the proposal is approved so long
as a quorum is present.
As of the record date, Pinnacle directors, executive officers
and their affiliates owned and were entitled to vote
approximately 1,461,162 shares of Pinnacle common stock,
representing approximately 9.39% of the outstanding shares of
Pinnacle common stock.
We currently expect that Pinnacles directors and executive
officers will vote their shares (1) For
approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger, although none of
them has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so;
and (2) For approval of the amendment to
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
The presence of a shareholder at the special meeting will not
automatically revoke that shareholders proxy. However, a
shareholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise
by:
|
|
|
|
|
submitting a written revocation prior to the meeting to Hugh M.
Queener, Corporate Secretary, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.,
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee 37201;
|
|
|
|
submitting another proxy by mail that is dated later than the
original proxy; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person.
|
If your shares are held by a broker or bank, you must follow the
instructions on the form you receive from your broker or bank
with respect to changing or revoking your proxy.
Pinnacle has retained The Altman Group to assist Pinnacle in the
solicitation of proxies from Pinnacle shareholders, for which
services such firm will be paid a customary fee plus
reimbursement of out of pocket expenses. In addition, directors,
officers and employees of Pinnacle may solicit proxies for the
special meeting from Pinnacle shareholders personally or by
telephone and other electronic means without additional
remuneration for soliciting such proxies. We also will provide
persons, firms, banks and corporations holding shares in their
names or in the names of nominees, which in either case are
beneficially owned by others, proxy materials for transmittal to
such beneficial owners and will reimburse such record owners for
their expenses in taking such actions.
The merger agreement provides that each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will pay its own expenses in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, except that Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will share equally the costs and expenses of printing and
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the
shareholders of Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC and other
regulatory authorities in connection with the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Pinnacle shareholders will not have dissenters rights in
connection with any matters being submitted for their
consideration at the Pinnacle special meeting, including
approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger.
36
Recommendation
by Pinnacles Board of Directors
The Pinnacle board of directors has approved unanimously the
merger agreement and approved the issuance of Pinnacle common
stock to the shareholders of
Mid-America
in connection with the merger. The Pinnacle board believes that
the proposed merger agreement and the related issuance of shares
of Pinnacle common stock each is fair to Pinnacle shareholders
and each is in their best interests. The Pinnacle board
recommends that Pinnacle shareholders vote For
approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger, as well as for the
adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to permit
Pinnacle to solicit additional proxies.
In addition, Pinnacles human resources and compensation
committee has recommended and its board of directors has
approved unanimously the amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan. The Pinnacle board believes the proposed amendment is in
the best interests of Pinnacles shareholders and,
therefore, recommends Pinnacle shareholders vote For
approval of the amendment to Pinnacles 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan.
37
MID-AMERICA
SHAREHOLDER MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished to
Mid-America
shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by
the
Mid-America
board of directors to be used at the special meeting of
shareholders to be held on, November 27, 2007 at,
10:00 a.m., local time, at Bank of the Souths office
at 551 North Mt. Juliet Road, Mt. Juliet, Tennessee 37122, and
at any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy are
being sent to
Mid-America
shareholders on or about October 15, 2007.
Purpose,
Record Date and Voting
At this special meeting, holders of
Mid-America
common stock will be asked to:
|
|
|
|
|
approve the merger agreement pursuant to which
Mid-America
will be merged with and into Pinnacle;
|
|
|
|
approve the adjournment of the
Mid-America
special meeting, if necessary, to permit
Mid-America
to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at
the special meeting to constitute a quorum or to approve the
merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
transact any other business that may properly come before the
meeting.
|
The
Mid-America
board of directors has fixed the close of business on
October 9, 2007 as the record date for determining the
holders of shares of
Mid-America
common stock entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
special meeting. Only holders of record of shares of
Mid-America
common stock at the close of business on that date will be
entitled to vote at the special meeting and at any adjournment
or postponement of that meeting. At the close of business on the
record date, there were 14,229,523 shares of
Mid-America
common stock outstanding, held by approximately 3,097 holders of
record.
Each holder of shares of
Mid-America
common stock outstanding on the record date will be entitled to
one vote for each share held of record upon each matter properly
submitted at the special meeting and at any adjournment or
postponement of that meeting. In order for
Mid-America
to satisfy its quorum requirements, the holders of at least a
majority of the total number of outstanding shares of
Mid-America
common stock entitled to vote at the meeting must be present.
You will be deemed to be present if you attend the meeting or if
you submit a properly executed proxy card that is received at or
prior to the meeting that is not subsequently revoked.
If your proxy card is properly executed and received by
Mid-America
in time to be voted at the special meeting, the shares
represented by your proxy card will be voted in accordance with
the instructions that you mark on your proxy card. If you
execute your proxy but do not provide
Mid-America
with any instructions, your shares will be voted For
the approval of the merger agreement and the other matters
described in the notice of special meeting delivered to
Mid-America
shareholders.
If your shares are held in street name by your
broker or bank and you do not provide your broker or bank with
instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or bank
will not be permitted to vote your shares, which will have the
same effect as a vote against approval of the merger agreement.
Approval of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Mid-America
common stock. Shares as to which the abstain box is
selected on a proxy card will be counted as present for purposes
of determining whether a quorum is present. The required vote
of
Mid-America
shareholders on the merger agreement is based upon the number of
outstanding shares of
Mid-America
common stock, and not the number of shares that are actually
voted. Accordingly, the failure to submit a proxy card or to
vote in person at the special meeting or the abstention from
voting by
Mid-America
shareholders will have the same effect as an Against
vote with respect to this matter.
38
As of the record date,
Mid-America
directors, executive officers and their affiliates owned and
were entitled to vote approximately 1,784,336 shares of
Mid-America
common stock, representing approximately 12.54% of the
outstanding shares of
Mid-America
common stock.
We currently expect that
Mid-Americas
directors and executive officers will vote their shares
For approval of the merger agreement.
Mid-Americas
executive officers and directors have entered into voting
agreements with Pinnacle pursuant to which they have agreed to
vote (1) in favor of the merger agreement; (2) against
any action or agreement that is reasonably likely to result in a
breach in any material respect of any covenant, representation
or warranty or any other obligation of
Mid-America
under the merger agreement; and (3) against (i) any
extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, rights
offering, reorganization, recapitalization or liquidation
involving
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries, (ii) a sale or transfer (other
than to a subsidiary of
Mid-America)
of assets of
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries comprising all or a substantial
portion of the assets of
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries, or a sale or transfer of any right
to all or a substantial portion of the revenues or income of
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries, by way of a negotiated purchase,
lease, license, exchange, joint venture or other means,
(iii) any change in a majority of the board of directors of
Mid-America,
or (iv) any action that is reasonably likely to materially
impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or adversely affect in
any material respect the merger and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
The presence of a shareholder at the special meeting will not
automatically revoke that shareholders proxy. However, a
shareholder may revoke a proxy at any time prior to its exercise
by:
|
|
|
|
|
submitting a written revocation prior to the meeting to James S.
Short, corporate secretary,
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc., 2019 Richard Jones Road, Nashville, Tennessee
37215;
|
|
|
|
submitting another proxy by mail that is dated later than the
original proxy; or
|
|
|
|
attending the special meeting and voting in person.
|
If your shares are held by a broker or bank, you must follow the
instructions on the form you receive from your broker or bank
with respect to changing or revoking your proxy.
In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers and
employees of
Mid-America
may solicit proxies for the special meeting from
Mid-America
shareholders personally or by telephone and other electronic
means without additional remuneration for soliciting such
proxies. We also will provide persons, firms, banks and
corporations holding shares in their names or in the names of
nominees, which in either case are beneficially owned by others,
proxy material for transmittal to such beneficial owners and
will reimburse such record owners for their expenses in taking
such actions.
The merger agreement provides that each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will pay its own expenses in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, except that Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will share equally the costs and expenses of printing and
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the
shareholders of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle, and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC or
other regulatory authorities in connection with the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Dissenting shareholders of
Mid-America
who comply with the provisions of Chapter 23 of the
Tennessee Business Corporation Act, are entitled to dissent from
the merger and receive payment of the fair value of their shares
of
Mid-America
common stock if the merger is consummated. A copy of
Chapter 23 of the Tennessee Business Corporation Act is
attached as Appendix B to the proxy
statement/prospectus. Please see the section entitled
PROPOSAL #1 FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL
PARTNERS, INC. AND
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: THE PROPOSED MERGER
Dissenters Rights in the proxy
39
statement/prospectus for a summary of the procedures to be
followed in asserting these dissenters rights. A
dissenting shareholder will be entitled to payment only if
written notice of intent to demand payment is delivered to
Mid-America
before the vote is taken and the shareholder does not vote in
favor of the merger agreement.
Recommendation
by
Mid-Americas
Board of Directors
The
Mid-America
board of directors has approved unanimously the merger
agreement. The
Mid-America
board believes that the proposed merger agreement is fair to
Mid-America
shareholders and is in their best interests. The
Mid-America
board recommends that
Mid-America
shareholders vote For approval of the merger
agreement as well as for the adjournment of the special meeting,
if necessary, to permit
Mid-America
to solicit additional proxies. In addition, members of
Mid-Americas
board of directors, together with their affiliates, owning
approximately 12.54% of the outstanding shares of
Mid-America
common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting have
entered into agreements with Pinnacle in which they have agreed
to vote their shares of
Mid-America
common stock in favor of the merger agreement. This means that
additional holders of approximately 37.47% of all
Mid-America
shares entitled to vote at the special meeting would need to
vote For the proposal to adopt the merger agreement
for it to be adopted.
40
PROPOSAL
#1 FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
AND
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: THE PROPOSED MERGER
Pinnacles board of directors is using this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of
Pinnacle common stock for use at the Pinnacle special meeting.
Mid-Americas
board of directors is also using this document to solicit
proxies from the holders of
Mid-America
common stock for use at the
Mid-America
special meeting. At the Pinnacle special meeting, holders of
Pinnacle common stock will be asked to vote upon, among other
things, the approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger. At the
Mid-America
special meeting, holders of
Mid-America
common stock will be asked to vote upon, among other things, the
approval of the merger agreement.
The merger will not be completed unless Pinnacles
shareholders approve the merger agreement and the issuance of
Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger and
Mid-Americas
shareholders approve the merger agreement.
This section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus describes
certain aspects of the merger, including the background of the
merger and the parties reasons for the merger.
The Pinnacle board of directors and the
Mid-America
board of directors each has approved the merger agreement, which
provides for the merger of
Mid-America
with and into Pinnacle, and the Pinnacle board also has approved
the issuance by Pinnacle of shares of Pinnacle common stock to
Mid-America
shareholders in connection with the merger. Pinnacle will be the
surviving corporation subsequent to the merger. We expect to
complete the merger in the fourth quarter of 2007 or first
quarter of 2008. Each share of Pinnacle common stock issued and
outstanding at the effective time of the merger will remain
issued and outstanding as one share of common stock of Pinnacle,
and each share of
Mid-America
common stock issued and outstanding at the effective time of the
merger will be converted into Pinnacle common stock (with each
share of
Mid-America
common stock being converted into 0.4655 shares of Pinnacle
common stock) and $1.50 in cash, with fractional shares being
paid in cash as described below. See THE MERGER
AGREEMENT Merger Consideration on page 78.
The Pinnacle charter and bylaws will be the charter and bylaws
of the combined company after the completion of the merger. At
the effective time of the merger, the Pinnacle board of
directors will be expanded by three members. These board
vacancies will be filled by three members of the existing
Mid-America
board of directors who are proposed by
Mid-America,
and reasonably acceptable to Pinnacle. These additional
directors will be apportioned among the Pinnacle board classes
so that the classes continue to have a number of directors as
equal as possible.
The merger agreement provides that the parties can amend the
merger agreement, to the extent legally permissible. However,
after any approval of the merger agreement by
Mid-Americas
and Pinnacles shareholders, no amendment can alter the
kind or amount of consideration to be provided to
Mid-America
shareholders without subsequent approval by
Mid-America
and Pinnacle shareholders.
Background
of the Transaction from the Perspective of Pinnacles
Board
Each June, Pinnacles board of directors conducts a
strategic planning retreat at which it considers various
strategic matters, including potential acquisition
possibilities, particularly opportunities to expand
Pinnacles Middle Tennessee franchise via acquisition. At
these sessions in June of 2005 and June of 2006, at the request
of Pinnacles senior management, representatives of Hovde
presented to Pinnacles board of directors information
concerning several Middle Tennessee banks and bank holding
companies, including PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South.
These presentations focused on the Tennessee merger and
acquisition landscape and various strategic options available to
Pinnacle, including continued growth-focused independence, as
well as potential target acquisitions of other financial
institutions. No specific determinations were made to pursue
41
PrimeTrust Bank, Bank of the South, or
Mid-America
as a result of these strategic planning discussions; however,
Pinnacles board of directors did instruct management to
continue to develop and maintain relationships with bankers in
Pinnacles market area (including senior management at
PrimeTrust and Bank of the South) and bankers that may be
interested in entering Pinnacles market area such that
Pinnacle might be in a position to capitalize on potential
future strategic partnerships with these entities should
opportunities that would significantly enhance shareholder value
be available.
In late October 2006, representatives of Hovde contacted M.
Terry Turner, Pinnacles president and chief executive
officer, and suggested that Pinnacles senior management
meet with
Mid-Americas
senior management regarding a potential transaction between
Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
Confidentiality agreements were subsequently executed by both
Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
On November 14, 2006, members of Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
senior management met in person to discuss the prospects of a
transaction between Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
From November 16, 2006 to or near December 6, 2006,
members of Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
senior management, along with their financial and legal
advisors, met to conduct additional due diligence and to discuss
the compatibility of the companies systems and other
potential synergies as well as employment-related matters and
held preliminary discussions about the potential terms of a
transaction between the two companies, including terms related
to price, type and mix of consideration that would be paid to
the
Mid-America
shareholders, tax matters and employment matters. During this
time period, Pinnacles legal advisor prepared an initial
draft of an agreement and plan of merger and related ancillary
agreements and distributed these documents to
Mid-America
and its legal and financial advisors. Sandler ONeill
consulted with Pinnacle on transaction structuring and pricing.
On or about December 6, 2006, Pinnacle was advised by
senior management of
Mid-America
that
Mid-America
was terminating discussions regarding a potential transaction.
Subsequently, Mr. Turner met with Mr. Scott and
Mr. Major in person to better understand
Mid-Americas
rationale for discontinuing negotiations at this time and to
assess the likelihood that negotiations might be re-initiated at
some point in the future. On December 15, 2006,
Mid-Americas
legal advisor notified Pinnacles legal advisor in writing
that
Mid-America
was terminating discussions regarding a potential transaction
and that
Mid-America
would not be providing comments to the draft agreements
previously circulated. Following receipt of this notice,
Pinnacles senior management, legal and financial advisors
terminated their negotiations with respect to a potential
transaction with
Mid-America.
Subsequently, and during the normal course of business, Pinnacle
and
Mid-America
representatives engaged in various discussions, including
several contractual business relationships (primarily loan
participations between Pinnacle and PrimeTrust Bank) and other
matters. During the spring of 2007, Mr. Turner and
Mr. Scott conducted an informal meeting to exchange ideas
concerning a future strategic partnership, but both determined
not to formally resume transaction negotiations at that time.
Also during this interim period, Pinnacle and Hovde met on
several occasions and engaged in discussions regarding
Mid-America
and other local bank holding companies that might be interested
in a future strategic partnership.
In early June of 2007, representatives of Hovde contacted
Mr. Turner to inquire as to whether Pinnacle would be
interested in formally resuming negotiations concerning a
potential merger with
Mid-America.
Mr. Turner responded that he believed resuming negotiations
would be received favorably by Pinnacles board of
directors and, given that the board would be conducting its
annual strategic planning retreat during the month, he would
present the matter to the board at that time. As had been the
previous practice, Mr. Turner also requested and
subsequently received information from Hovde and other
investment banking firms concerning strategic options for
Pinnacle, including strategic merger and acquisition
alternatives for review by Pinnacles board of directors at
their regularly scheduled annual strategic planning retreat.
In June of 2007, Pinnacles board of directors again
conducted its annual strategic planning retreat and again
considered various strategic matters, including potential
acquisition possibilities. At the June 2007 session,
representatives of Sandler ONeill presented
Pinnacles board of directors with information concerning a
potential transaction with
Mid-America.
After much discussion, Pinnacles board determined it was
in the best interest of Pinnacles shareholders to resume
negotiations concerning a potential transaction with
Mid-America.
Subsequently, Pinnacle notified Hovde of Pinnacles
decision. In late June of 2007, the senior managements of
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
began to plan the due diligence process.
42
From July 11, 2007 to August 15, 2007, members of
Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
senior managements, along with their financial and legal
advisors, met to conduct due diligence and to again discuss the
compatibility of the companies systems and other potential
synergies as well as employment-related matters and held
preliminary discussions about the potential terms of a
transaction between the parties, including terms related to
price, type and mix of consideration that would be paid to the
Mid-America
shareholders, tax matters and employment matters. Sandler
ONeill also consulted Pinnacle on transaction structuring
and pricing.
On July 11, 2007, Pinnacles legal advisor distributed
an updated draft of the agreement and plan of merger to
Mid-Americas
legal advisor. On July 25, 2007,
Mid-Americas
legal advisor sent a list of comments and questions on the draft
merger agreement to Pinnacles legal advisor. From
July 25, 2007 to August 15, 2007, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and their respective financial and legal advisors finalized the
terms of the merger agreement and the related ancillary
agreements.
During this time, on August 3, 2007, Mr. Turner met
with representatives of Hovde following Hovdes meeting
with
Mid-Americas
board, senior management and legal advisors to discuss
Mid-Americas
preferences concerning certain selected transaction terms
subject to the completion of due diligence and the approval of
both Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
boards of directors. These negotiating points included the
exchange ratio, the inclusion of a pricing floor in
the definitive merger agreement and the timing of the
transaction announcements. Negotiations continued thru
August 10, 2007 at which time the legal advisors of
Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
working with their clients, finalized the terms of the
definitive merger agreement and related ancillary agreements for
presentation to the respective boards of directors.
On August 13, 2007, Mr. Turner met with Jason West to
discuss the proposed terms of Mr. Wests employment
agreement.
On the afternoon of August 15, 2007, the Pinnacle board of
directors, except for one director who was absent, met with
members of Pinnacles senior management and Pinnacles
legal and financial advisors. Mr. Turner and other members
of Pinnacles senior management reviewed with the Pinnacle
board of directors information regarding Pinnacle,
Mid-America
and the terms of the proposed transaction. Sandler ONeill
then reviewed with the Pinnacle board of directors a range of
matters, including the structure of the merger, business and
financial information regarding the two companies, historical
stock price performance, valuation methodologies and analyses
and the other matters set forth in Opinion of
Pinnacles Financial Advisor. Sandler
ONeills presentation assumed that the aggregate
merger consideration consisted of the equivalent of
0.4655 shares of Pinnacle common stock and $1.50 in cash
for each share of
Mid-America
common stock. After the discussion, Sandler ONeill
rendered to the Pinnacle board of directors its oral opinion
that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the
considerations described to the board, the proposed merger
consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Pinnacle. Members of Pinnacles senior management also
apprised the Pinnacle board of directors of the results of its
due diligence investigations of
Mid-America
and its subsidiary banks. Pinnacles legal advisor
discussed with the Pinnacle board of directors the legal
standards applicable to its decisions and actions with respect
to the proposed transaction and reviewed the terms of the
proposed merger.
Following these presentations, the Pinnacle board meeting
continued with discussions and questions among the members of
the Pinnacle board of directors, management and Pinnacles
legal and financial advisors. Following these discussions and
after taking into consideration the factors described under
Pinnacles Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendation of the Stock Issuance in the Merger by the
Pinnacle board of directors, the Pinnacle board of
directors voted to approve the merger with
Mid-America
and the definitive merger agreement and related ancillary
agreements.
After the close of trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on
August 15, 2007, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
executed the merger agreement and publicly announced the
execution of the merger agreement.
43
Background
of the Transaction from the Perspective of
Mid-Americas
Board
Mid-America
was formed effective September 1, 2006, through the merger
of PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South. PrimeTrust Bank and
Bank of the South agreed to affiliate under common ownership
without, immediately, merging the two banks. The management of
the two banks believed that the proposed share exchange would
enable them to achieve certain synergies and cost savings
without sacrificing their individual identities and without
having to reduce their staffs. The banks believed that this
affiliation under the ownership of
Mid-America
would also allow them to offer a broader range of services. The
increase in the number of offices available to the two
banks customers was also intended to facilitate product
distribution and to enhance customer service. In general, these
goals have been realistic. The
Mid-America
board of directors has been generally satisfied with the
companys progress towards its goals.
However, significant developments in the banking and financial
services industries, including increased emphasis and dependence
on technology, and specialization of products and services,
continue. More and more banks have entered into the Middle
Tennessee market resulting in ever increasing competition.
Competition from new types of financial institutions, and from
less regulated financial service institutions, has also grown.
In addition, regulatory burdens and costs have also increased.
Among other things, the costs of compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are seen by
the board as significant and unlikely to decrease. In view of
its rapidly increasing size, the management and board of
Mid-America
had determined that
Mid-America
needed to sign a multi-year data processing agreement for state
of the art data processing services that would require not only
the investment of substantial amounts of money over several
years but also a termination fee, in the event of a future
merger with another institution, that could also be substantial.
Soon after
Mid-America
was formed in 2006, its management was contacted by Hovde
regarding a possible combination with Pinnacle, the holding
company for Pinnacle National Bank. Hovde had served as
PrimeTrust Banks financial advisor in the formation of
Mid-America
and had provided a fairness opinion to PrimeTrust Banks
shareholders in connection with the share exchange. Hovde had
also served as financial advisor to Cavalry in Pinnacles
acquisition of Cavalry in early 2006. Pinnacle is headquartered
in Nashville and has experienced rapid growth since it opened
for business in October of 2000.
Mid-Americas
board was interested in exploring the opportunities that it
perceived in a possible combination with Pinnacle and authorized
management to explore this possible affiliation. With
Hovdes assistance, management began a dialogue with
Pinnacles management in November of 2006 and, subject to a
confidentiality agreement, exchanged information and conducted
mutual due diligence. The
Mid-America
board of directors met twice to consider issues related to the
proposal and received the advice of Hovde with respect to the
pros and cons of both a transaction with Pinnacle and any type
of merger transaction at that time. A draft of a proposed merger
agreement was discussed by
Mid-Americas
management and the parties identified significant potential cost
savings that might be achieved in the transaction.
Notwithstanding the perceived attractiveness of an affiliation
with Pinnacle, three primary factors led the
Mid-America
board of directors to terminate the discussions with Pinnacle in
December 2006. First,
Mid-America
had not begun realizing the planned synergies and cost savings
from the share exchange transaction. Second, the
Mid-America
board believed that more time should be allowed to evaluate
Pinnacles success in retaining the customers, and in
integrating, retaining and assimilating the staff of Cavalry.
The
Mid-America
board believed that if more than a year lapsed from the
effective time of Pinnacles merger with Calvary the board
would have a better perspective on Pinnacles ability to
effectively realize upon an in-market acquisition. It was
believed that the Cavalry merger had been a significant
component of the rapid price increase in Pinnacles shares
and in its above-peer price-to-earnings ratio.
Mid-America
believed that pricing a transaction with Pinnacle at a time when
Pinnacles price-to-earnings ratio was very high, compared
to more traditional financial institution price-to-earnings
ratios could be complicated or risky. This difficulty was
increased by the fact that
Mid-America
had not yet demonstrated that it could achieve synergies,
realize cost savings, and continue profitable growth since it
had only just begun operations less than three months before.
Thus, any premium paid for
Mid-America
shares would have been subject to market skepticism and paid for
with Pinnacle shares that had a very high price-to earnings
ratio in the opinion of the
Mid-America
board and a possibly unsustainable stock price. Third,
Mid-America
only recently had entered into change of control agreements with
Chairman Gary L. Scott and Executive Vice President Jason K.
West, to replace their
44
change of control agreements with PrimeTrust Bank, and had also
entered into change of control agreements with President David
Major and Executive Vice President James S. Short. The
consummation of a merger in early or mid 2007 would have
resulted in significant tax liability (so-called excess
parachute payments) under Section 280G of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, for
these executive officers. For these and other reasons, the
Mid-America
board in December of 2006 directed management to terminate
discussions with Pinnacle. Negotiations were terminated on
December 15, 2006.
Once it became apparent to
Mid-Americas
management, early in the second quarter of 2007, that
Mid-Americas
rapid growth was continuing and cost savings and synergies were
being achieved, management of
Mid-America
deemed it appropriate to request that Hovde make a presentation
to its board of directors to revisit strategic alternatives.
First, the rapid growth made it likely that
Mid-America
would have to consider raising capital in the near future. In
addition, management was aware that, by mid-2008,
Mid-America
would have to begin converting to a new data processing platform
for its two banks at considerable expense. Finally, the recent
announcement of two Nashville bank acquisitions (Civitas
BankGroup by Green Bankshares, headquartered in Greenville,
Tennessee and Capital Bancorp by Renasant Corporation,
headquartered in Tupelo, Mississippi), as well as the
announcement of two new entrants into the Davidson County
market, each with plans to raise more than $75 million in
new capital, were also considerations that needed to be
addressed.
At
Mid-America
managements request, on May 30, 2007, Hovde made a
presentation to the
Mid-America
board of directors of its strategic assessment of
Mid-Americas
alternatives for growth. Among the matters discussed, Hovde
presented data on market demographics, the increased number of
new, or de novo, banks being formed in the
Nashville MSA, recent merger activity, the opportunity for
internal, or organic, growth, and existing market
dynamics that Hovde saw as favoring strong community banks.
Hovde reported to the board numerous factors that made
Mid-America
both a quality standalone company and an attractive merger
partner. These included growth in loans, deposits, and total
assets at an annual compounded rate of at least 30%, solid
consolidated earnings, strong management, an attractive and
suitably located branch network, acceptable consolidated
capital, an attractively diversified loan portfolio, and a low
percentage of non-performing assets (0.30% at March 31,
2007). Hovde also noted that competition for deposits and loans
from competing banks, including de novo banks, was heightening,
while at the same time there was strong demand from acquirers
seeking a franchise in the Nashville MSA. In the opinion of
management, acquirers that would be interested in
Mid-America
would want to obtain as large a market presence from an
acquisition as possible.
Mid-America
was, as of March 31, 2007, approximately the third largest
independent financial institution headquartered in the Nashville
MSA in terms of asset size and held the tenth ranked share of
the entire Nashville MSA (the fifth largest share among
Tennessee-based institutions) in terms of deposit market share.
Hovde also discussed with the board of directors of
Mid-America
the pros and cons of a new public offering of its stock in order
to raise capital to support the companys rapidly growing
bank subsidiaries. Factors favoring a new offering included
listing
Mid-Americas
shares on a recognized stock exchange, such as the Nasdaq Stock
Market, creating a more liquid market for its shares, and the
possibility of enhancing its reputation by having a recognized,
publicly traded stock. However, raising new capital would dilute
existing ownership, divert management time, entail significant
expense, and involve additional layers of securities law
compliance. In addition, according to Hovde, the price per share
to be obtained in an offering of
Mid-America
securities could be expected to be less than what could be
obtained in the sale of the company. The board believed that a
new capital offering was likely and necessary should the company
continue to rapidly grow as an independent company.
Hovde next discussed with the board of directors the concept of
de-registering its shares under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act in a so-called going
private transaction. Although this alternative would
involve some expense at the outset (counsel and accounting fees,
financial advisor fees, SEC filing fees, and printing and
related costs), management believes that it would save the
company significant sums over time that could be reinvested into
the subsidiary banks operations. However, at that point
Mid-Americas
shares would not be eligible for listing on a public exchange,
such as the OTC Bulletin Board system, even if it could be
listed in the pink sheet quotation system. In
addition, with more
45
than 3,000 shareholders of record,
Mid-America
would have to force a significant number of smaller shareholders
to sell their shares back to the company in a reverse stock
split or cash out merger, an alternative that the
board of directors did not find attractive in a community bank
context.
Finally, Hovde discussed with the
Mid-America
board of directors the pros and cons of a merger transaction in
the near future. It was Hovdes opinion that the
companys anticipated capital needs, data processing needs,
and other challenges led to the conclusion that
Mid-America
should at least consider the sale of the company before
incurring the long-term expenses associated with raising new
capital, converting to a new data-processing platform, and
continuing to deal with increasing regulatory burdens (like
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act) on a standalone
basis. Hovde reviewed various comparable transactions, pricing
and valuation methodologies and pro forma analyses, and other
insights into a possible merger transaction with another
financial institution in the near term. Hovde discussed with the
board the relative merits of particular acquirers, including
Pinnacle.
Among the advantages offered by Pinnacle that were identified by
Hovde included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Americas
impact on Pinnacles asset size would be dramatic: the
combined company would be around $3.2 billion rather than
the $1.0 billion for
Mid-America
and $2.2 billion for Pinnacle as of March 31, 2007;
|
|
|
|
Both
Mid-America
and Pinnacle have had compatible and successful strategies for
rapid growth;
|
|
|
|
Apparently complementary cultures at the two institutions based
on forward-thinking, entrepreneurial strategies, that could be
expected to be more attractive to
Mid-Americas
customers and staff;
|
|
|
|
There exists substantial mutual respect between the management
of Pinnacle and the management of
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
The companies have a complementary branch structure that will
have little overlap over existing and planned branches;
|
|
|
|
By virtue of the decrease in price-to-earnings multiple related
to Pinnacles shares, Pinnacle has a lesser downside risk
than it had in December of 2006 and, in the opinion of Hovde,
greater upside potential; and
|
|
|
|
If Pinnacle were to be ultimately acquired,
Mid-America
shareholders would have the ability to participate in any
premium paid for Pinnacle. This would be in addition to the
premium expected to be offered by Pinnacle for
Mid-Americas
shares.
|
In addition, according to Hovde, in the event that a transaction
with Pinnacle is structured so that it is accretive to
Pinnacles earnings per share, the impact of a
Pinnacle
Mid-America
transaction should have a positive impact on the combined
companys share price that will further benefit
Mid-America
shareholders who receive Pinnacle shares in a merger.
After a lengthy
question-and-answer
session, the
Mid-America
board of directors voted to direct management to re-engage in
discussions with Pinnacle, with the assistance of Hovde and with
the companys accounting and legal advisors. Given
Hovdes advice that no other attractive acquirer could
afford to offer as much as Pinnacle in an accretive transaction,
the board did not think it was appropriate to shop
Mid-America.
(Hovde advised the
Mid-America
board of directors that it believed that the timing of a
transaction, shortly following the soon-to-be closed acquisition
of Capital Bancorp by Renasant Corporation, would be a favorable
development for both
Mid-America
and Pinnacle. It was the consensus of the members of the
Mid-America
board of directors that the company was not for sale
but that a strategic alliance with Pinnacle was an attractive
alternative to continued independence. This conclusion was
further supported by reference to the age of senior management
at the subsidiary banks and the fact that a combination with
Pinnacle would provide a greater depth of management and
management succession for the long term. The purpose of the
discussions was to determine whether Pinnacle might continue to
have an interest in making a merger offer for
Mid-Americas
shares.
46
After internal analysis of potential synergies and the costs of
a transaction with Pinnacle during the month of June of 2007,
management met with
Mid-Americas
external legal counsel and its independent registered public
accounting firm in early July of 2007 to discuss the proposed
merger with Pinnacle in detail. Several meetings took place
between management and the legal and accounting firms during the
course of July, combined with various conference calls with
Hovde. During July, management also directed an in-depth study
of possible synergies and cost savings and began preparation for
due diligence by
Mid-America
of Pinnacle and by Pinnacle of
Mid-America.
Mid-America
also began a study of the merits and costs of retention bonus
arrangements for its employees and determined that all employees
should be afforded the protection of a retention bonus if they
served for at least one year after the transaction, until
December 31, 2008 or until their position was eliminated,
whichever came first. This would also have the effect of
lessening the opportunities for competitors to hire away
Mid-Americas
employees. Also during July of 2007, both companies continued to
perform their due diligence. Management of the two companies
discussed on multiple occasions potential operational issues,
cost savings that each believed to be attainable, and retention
bonuses. Pinnacles management was very supportive of the
retention bonus concept for all
Mid-America
employees.
On July 11, 2007, the parties began negotiations of a
definitive merger agreement. Management, counsel, accountants
and Hovde identified various issues for scrutiny and for further
discussion. The parties negotiated over the merger
consideration, the amount to be paid in Pinnacle stock and the
amount to be paid in cash, whether there should be a
floor for the Pinnacle stock price that would allow
Mid-America
to opt out of the transaction, whether there would be a
termination fee for Pinnacle, and whether there should be an
option for shareholders who desired to receive more cash or more
stock to make such an election (subject to the overall
limitations of the amount of stock and cash consideration to be
available in the transaction). These negotiations continued
during July and early August. Ultimately, after negotiations, it
was agreed that the transaction would be structured based on an
exchange ratio of 0.4655 shares of Pinnacle stock plus
$1.50 in cash for each share of
Mid-America
stock. Based on Hovdes recommendation,
Mid-America
agreed that the floor for the merger consideration
would be a two-pronged floor tied to both
Pinnacles stock price and the Nasdaq Bank Index.
Mid-America
ultimately concluded that the proposed option for allowing
shareholders to elect more cash, or more stock, as part of the
merger consideration was unnecessarily confusing and might
frustrate shareholders who did not timely make an election, or
whose election was not timely received.
In July of 2007, a special meeting of the board of directors of
Mid-America
to discuss the anticipated merger agreement was scheduled for
August 2, 2007. However, during July of 2007 the stock
market suffered several downward corrections and the stock
prices of many publicly traded financial institutions, including
Pinnacle, fell significantly. A meeting was still held on
August 2, 2007 during which Hovde discussed recent systemic
market developments, implications on valuations of the stock of
publicly traded financial institutions, specific recent price
performance of Pinnacle, and recommendations as to current and
potential nominal value impacts for
Mid-America
shareholders. As a result management, in consultation with the
financial advisor and legal counsel, agreed to proceed with
discussions but to delay the proposed meeting to further
evaluate the Pinnacle stock price over the next 10 trading days.
During that period, the Pinnacle stock price showed overall
improvement.
A draft definitive agreement in substantially final form, and
copies of proposed voting and affiliate agreements to be signed
by members of the
Mid-America
board, were distributed to
Mid-America
board members on August 10, 2007, in anticipation of a
special meeting of the
Mid-America
board of directors set for August 13, 2007 to discuss the
proposed definitive agreement. The board of directors of
Mid-America
met on August 13, 2007, and received presentations from
management about the financial and business details of the
proposed transaction. Legal counsel then led the members of the
board in a section by section, paragraph by paragraph,
discussion of the proposed definitive agreement and the voting
and affiliate agreements. The board asked numerous questions of
counsel, the representatives of the independent registered
public accounting firm, and management. In general, the board
seemed in favor of the proposed merger but no vote was taken at
this meeting. Legal counsel proposed that board members review
their copies of the merger, voting and affiliate agreements,
review their notes of this meeting, and review the presentation
made by Hovde at the May 30, 2007, board meeting. In
addition, management and counsel advised the board that they
would be
47
available to respond to questions that members of the board
might have before the next scheduled board meeting on
August 15, 2007.
On August 15, 2007, the
Mid-America
board of directors met again to consider the proposed merger.
All of the members of both bank boards were also present. The
special meeting was also attended by management, representatives
of Hovde and representatives of the legal counsels firm.
Hovde made a lengthy and detailed presentation to the
Mid-America
board and answered many questions about the impact of the
transaction on the shareholders and on
Mid-America.
Management described for the board the likelihood that all but
30 to 40 of the employees of
Mid-America
would likely be offered positions by Pinnacle. Legal counsel
reviewed for the board the editorial changes that had been made
in the definitive agreement and presented to the board a set of
proposed resolutions that he recommended for adoption. Legal
counsel also noted that Pinnacle had requested the right to
close the merger in 2007, rather than 2008. The principal impact
on
Mid-America
was that the change of control agreements and related payments,
and the vesting of equity incentives issued by
Mid-America,
would be triggered in 2007 rather than in 2008. This would
decrease the amount of such payments in the aggregate by
approximately $400,000. However, Pinnacle had not asked that the
merger consideration be changed. To protect the employees who
hold change of control agreements (including Messrs. Scott,
Major, Short and West), the board agreed that their agreements
should be amended to reflect that payments to them under these
agreements would be the same whether the merger was closed in
2007 or 2008.
The merger agreement between
Mid-America
and Pinnacle was executed by both
Mid-America
and Pinnacle on August 15, 2007 and the agreement became
effective on that same date. The transaction was announced on
Wednesday, August 15, 2007 by a press release jointly
issued by Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
Pinnacles
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Merger and the
Stock Issuance in the Merger by the Pinnacle Board of
Directors
The Pinnacle board of directors has determined that the merger
is advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Pinnacle and
its shareholders. In adopting the merger agreement, the Pinnacle
board consulted with its financial advisor with respect to the
financial aspects of the merger and fairness to Pinnacle, from a
financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid to
Mid-Americas
shareholders in the merger and with its independent legal
counsel as to its legal duties and the terms of the merger
agreement. In arriving at its determination, the Pinnacle board
of directors also considered a number of factors, including the
following material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger consideration is fair to Pinnacle from a financial
point of view;
|
|
|
|
the Merger would give Pinnacle a stronger presence in
Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro MSA, one of the fastest growing
MSAs in the United States, particularly in Wilson, Dickson and
Cheatham Counties in the MSA;
|
|
|
|
the two institutions have potential cost synergies
Pinnacle will be utilizing
Mid-Americas
current work force to help with Pinnacles growth,
Mid-Americas
two bank subsidiaries will migrate to a common processing
platform with Pinnacle National Bank and three
Mid-America
locations will be consolidated into existing Pinnacle locations;
|
|
|
|
the merger will result in increased size and scale; the combined
company is expected to have pro forma assets of approximately
$3.5 billion, resulting in increased lending capacity, and
30 offices (net of closures) in some of the fastest growing
areas in the Nashville MSA;
|
|
|
|
the merger is anticipated to enhance the franchise value of
Pinnacle, both in the short-run and in the long-run and the
increased size and scale of the combined company should increase
its attractiveness to larger potential acquirors;
|
|
|
|
the merger is expected to enhance Pinnacles geographic
market coverage by increasing its deposit market share in the
Nashville MSA and expanding its branch system into three new
counties in the Nashville MSA;
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is expected to be accretive to Pinnacles
earnings beginning in 2008;
|
|
|
|
the merger increases the float in Pinnacle common stock by
approximately 45%;
|
|
|
|
the merger brings to Pinnacles team a number of
outstanding bankers;
|
|
|
|
the merger will generally be a tax-free transaction for Pinnacle
and its new shareholders to the extent of the stock portion of
the merger consideration; and
|
|
|
|
although the merger will result in Pinnacles tangible
equity to tangible assets ratio being below 6%, its historical
strategic target, Pinnacle and its bank subsidiary will remain
well-capitalized institutions after the merger and the related
issuance of trust preferred securities under all applicable
regulatory capital requirements.
|
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by the Pinnacle board of directors is not exhaustive,
but includes the material factors considered by the Pinnacle
board of directors. In view of the wide variety of factors
considered by the Pinnacle board of directors in connection with
its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of such matters,
the Pinnacle board of directors did not consider it practical
to, nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in
reaching its decision. The Pinnacle board of directors discussed
the factors described above, asked questions of Pinnacles
management and Pinnacles legal and financial advisors, and
reached general consensus that the merger was in the best
interests of Pinnacle and Pinnacle shareholders.
In considering the factors described above, individual members
of the Pinnacle board of directors may have given different
weights to different factors. It should be noted that this
explanation of the Pinnacle boards reasoning and all other
information presented in this section is forward-looking in
nature and, therefore, should be read in light of the factors
discussed under the heading CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS above.
The Pinnacle board of directors determined that the merger, the
merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger are in the best interests of Pinnacle
and its shareholders.
For the reasons set forth above, the Pinnacle board of
directors has approved unanimously the merger agreement and
approved the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection
with the merger and believes that it is in the best interests of
Pinnacle and its shareholders and recommends that its
shareholders vote For this proposal.
Mid-Americas
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Merger by the
Mid-America
Board of Directors
Mid-Americas
board of directors considered a variety of factors in deciding
to approve the merger agreement and to recommend it to its
shareholders. The
Mid-America
board was cognizant of the facts that
Mid-America
is relatively newly formed, that it has not entirely achieved
the synergies that it sought when it was formed by PrimeTrust
Bank and Bank of the South, that it has (in the opinion of its
board and management) an outstanding franchise and the potential
for rapid, profitable growth. However, after considering the
opportunities offered by an affiliation with Pinnacle and
careful consideration of the recommendations of Hovde,
Mid-Americas
financial advisor, the board determined to approve the merger
and recommend it to
Mid-Americas
shareholders.
Factors
Favoring the Merger
Although the board of
Mid-America
considered a wide range of factors in approving the merger, and
no one factor necessarily predominated in the analysis of any
one or more members of the board, the following factors strongly
favored a current affiliation with Pinnacle:
|
|
|
|
|
First, Pinnacles shares are readily marketable and have
reflected a strong overall upward trend for most of
Pinnacles time in operation. Because the price-to-earnings
ratio of Pinnacles common stock has
|
49
been generally higher than that shown by regional bank stocks,
Pinnacle had the capacity to pay a relatively higher price for
Mid-America
shares than other potential acquirers appear to possess based on
the analysis of
Mid-Americas
financial advisor.
|
|
|
|
|
Second, Pinnacle is headquartered in the Nashville MSA and
appears to employ a veteran group of skilled bankers that will
be attractive to
Mid-Americas
customers, employees and other stakeholders, and that will be
well positioned to serve the communities that PrimeTrust Bank
and Bank of the South serve. Based on
Mid-Americas
research, following the 2005 merger between Pinnacle and
Cavalry, then an independent community bank holding company
headquartered in Rutherford County, Tennessee, the companies
have apparently been successful in retaining customers and key
personnel.
|
|
|
|
Third, at the present time relatively little market overlap
exists between Pinnacles operations and those of Bank of
the South and PrimeTrust Bank. However, in the
Mid-America
boards view, this would change as both of
Mid-Americas
banks (Bank of the South and PrimeTrust Bank) and Pinnacle
National Bank increased their branching efforts in Wilson,
Williamson, Rutherford and Davidson Counties. As a result of
probable future branch-system overlap, the negative impact on a
possible future merger and on the employees who might staff
overlapping branches were believed to be significant.
|
|
|
|
Fourth, the board believed that an affiliation with Pinnacle
would make the combined entity both more competitive in the
Middle Tennessee marketplace and a more attractive vehicle for
entry into the market by a larger acquirer than would either
institution on a standalone basis. The combination eliminates a
significant possibility for an out-of-state acquirer seeking a
substantial presence in the Nashville area to offer to acquire
one or the other of Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
possibly at a lesser price than the combined entity may be
expected to bring in an acquisition. Both Hovde and the board
believed that this merger can have the result of allowing the
shareholders of
Mid-America,
who become shareholders of Pinnacle, to receive another premium
on their shares in the event of such an acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further, the cost-saving synergies that could be achieved in the
merger, estimated by Mid-America at $7.4 million to
$9 million, can be expected to increase the profitability
of the combined institution. The combined company can expect to
achieve cost savings that neither company could attain
independently of the other. These cost savings should ultimately
flow through to the shareholders as additional earnings per
share. Among other significant savings,
Mid-America
subsidiary banks will not have to convert to a planned new data
processing system on a standalone basis, which they were
scheduled to do in mid 2008. Rather, they will convert to the
data processing system used by Pinnacle. Had
Mid-America
elected to remain independent for the present, but then later
determined to be acquired, it is likely that the shareholders of
Mid-America
would have had to bear all or part of the costs of terminating
the contract with the new data processing service provider
potentially at a significant cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, if
Mid-America
were to remain independent, the company would have to consider
the costs and benefits of raising new capital, listing its
shares for public trading, and, as noted above, converting to a
new data processing platform. The board believed that these
costs would materially impact
Mid-Americas
standalone profitability.
|
|
|
|
Further, the costs of complying with increasing layers of bank
regulation, and with the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 were a concern to management and the
Mid-America
board. The merger offered the opportunity to spread the costs of
compliance over a greater dollar volume of assets (reducing the
cost of compliance allocable to each dollar of assets) and to
eliminate an entire level of reporting (as a result of the
merger, only Pinnacle as the combined entity will bear the costs
of reporting, rather than two separate entities, Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
as is true today).
|
|
|
|
Also, a merger would be expected to be a tax free
re-organization for most nondissenting shareholders except to
the extent of the possible taxability of the $1.50 per share
being paid in cash for each share of
Mid-America
common stock. Moreover, the federal 15% income tax on long-term
capital gains and dividends is set to expire in 2010,
potentially resulting in higher taxes on dividends and capital
gains unless Congress affirmatively acts to extend the current
tax level. There can be no assurance that Congress will vote to
extend the current tax level and, therefore, the combination
with Pinnacle, given
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
the liquidity in Pinnacles shares, provides a mechanism
for
Mid-America
shareholders to elect to sell all or part of their shares before
the expiration of the current tax level. Even if
Mid-America
listed its shares in 2008, as the board had considered, there
could have been no assurance that a sufficient market would have
developed to allow a significant number of shares to be sold to
accommodate
Mid-America
shareholders who chose to sell before the tax laws changed. The
Mid-America
board believes that the market for Pinnacle, having been
established for several years, would be more likely to be able
to handle the trading that may be required by
Mid-America
shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next, the factors and considerations explained to the board of
directors by
Mid-Americas
financial advisor, Hovde, were extremely favorable to engaging
in the merger transaction with Pinnacle at this time. Hovde
strongly recommended this transaction as a unique and attractive
opportunity for
Mid-America
and its shareholders. In addition, Hovde issued its opinion to
the board of directors that the transaction was, as of the date
of the opinion, fair to
Mid-America
and to the shareholders of
Mid-America
from a financial point of view.
|
|
|
|
In addition, the board of directors was impressed with the
management depth at Pinnacle and believed that access to the
Pinnacle management team would benefit
Mid-America
customers and employees and would provide significant capable
management and appropriate management succession. The strength
of Pinnacles management team and its apparent commitment
to and competitiveness in the Middle Tennessee market were
attractive to the
Mid-America
board. They believed that these factors would enhance the value
of the shareholders investment in
Mid-America,
as well as providing additional liquidity for its shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, the board of directors considered the impact of the
timing of the transaction on the return on investment of
Mid-Americas
shareholders. The initial investors in PrimeTrust Bank and Bank
of the South paid, on a split adjusted basis, $5.00 per share
and $4.58 per share, respectively. Investors who bought
PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South stock in the banks
last capital offering paid, on a split adjusted basis, $7.50 per
share and $9.86 per share, respectively.
Mid-Americas
board believed that the merger consideration of approximately
$13.18 per share on the date the transaction was announced
($15.83 on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus),
involving receipt by
Mid-America
shareholders of a more liquid and potentially more attractive
stock of the combined entity, constituted a reasonable or even
excellent return to investors who bought shares directly from
the two banks before the
Mid-America
share exchange in September 2006.
|
All of the foregoing factors, as well as others, were considered
by the
Mid-America
board of directors and were believed by the board to favor a
merger with Pinnacle at this time.
Factors
Possibly Contrary to the Merger
On the other hand, other factors were seen as negatives. These
included:
|
|
|
|
|
When
Mid-America
was formed by a share exchange in September of 2006, the board
believed, and so informed shareholders of PrimeTrust Bank and
Bank of the South, that it was anticipated that the combined
institution would take some time to achieve the synergies that
were anticipated but that these synergies were expected to have
a positive impact on long-term profitability. These synergies
have not been fully achieved. It is possible that, by remaining
independent, realization of these synergies could make
Mid-America
an even more attractive acquisition target, to the financial
benefit of the
Mid-America
shareholders. However, the synergies expected to be achieved in
the proposed merger with Pinnacle exceed those that
Mid-America
expected to obtain in the combination of Bank of the South and
PrimeTrust Bank.
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
has achieved significant growth since September 2006. At the
time of the share exchange, it had combined assets of
$875 million. As of June 30, 2007,
Mid-America
has consolidated assets of $1.07 billion, representing a
growth of nearly $195 million (22.25%). However, recent
developments in the financial markets have made continued
profitable growth more difficult, at least in the short term.
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
These factors include an inverted yield curve and a nearly
industry-wide compressed net interest margin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the time of the share exchange, the
Mid-America
board, through its subsidiary banks, envisioned an ongoing
branching plan that would further penetrate the Middle Tennessee
market South of I-40, especially along the I-840 corridor. This
branching plan was well conceived and might have further
enhanced the value of
Mid-Americas
shares. Nonetheless, the combination with Pinnacle will result
in a combined entity with 30 branches (after three anticipated
branch closures), a number of branches that far exceeds the
level that
Mid-Americas
subsidiary banks expected to open in the next five years.
|
|
|
|
When
Mid-America
was formed, it offered change of control agreements to
Messrs. Scott and West, to replace their agreements with
PrimeTrust Bank, and to Messrs. Major and Short, who did
not then have such agreements. It was expected that such
contracts, which will become fully payable at the effective time
of the merger, at a cost to the combined company of an estimated
$5.7 million (approximately $4.4 million after tax),
as will a contract due to Mr. Charles Lanier, an executive
vice president of PrimeTrust Bank. Originally, it was intended
that such contracts would not be payable for several years, at
least.
|
|
|
|
When the share exchange was completed in September 2006,
Mid-America
granted restricted shares and non-qualified stock options to
executive management and to members of the board of directors,
as well as non-qualified stock options and stock appreciation
rights to officers and employees. It was anticipated that most
of these equity incentives would vest only after a number of
years. The vesting schedule was ultimately set generally at 10%
per year. Instead, as a result of the merger, these equity
incentives granted to directors and executive officers (with an
aggregate value of approximately $3.6 million (based upon
the value of the consideration paid by Pinnacle on the date the
merger was approved)) will vest at the effective time of the
merger.
|
|
|
|
Another company might have offered more for
Mid-Americas
shares than Pinnacle. However, Hovde provided the
Mid-America
board with analyses that demonstrated that no other attractive
acquirer could afford to pay as much as Pinnacle for the
Mid-America
shares and have the transaction remain accretive to the
acquirers earnings per share. In addition, the
Mid-America
board believes that
Mid-America
should not enter into an auction process. Rather, it appeared to
the board based on discussion with Hovdes representatives
that the Pinnacle transaction was unique and warranted the
boards decision to recommend to the shareholders that they
approve a merger with Pinnacle even though, in the opinion of
the board,
Mid-America
had a viable long-term strategic plan to continue to operate as
an independent company and was not for sale.
|
|
|
|
Anticipated cost and revenue synergies expected for the combined
company might not be obtained on a timely basis or they might
not be obtained at all. Integrating the operations of the two
companies and the subsidiary banks could be more costly and
might not be as profitable as currently anticipated.
|
|
|
|
The merger could result in the loss of key employees and
customers, disruptions and negative experiences by customers,
deposit attrition and revenue loss, possible inconsistencies in
standards, control procedures and policies, unexpected problems
with costs, operations, personnel, technology and credit;
and/or
problems with the assimilation of new operations, sites or
personnel, which could divert resources from regular banking
operations.
|
|
|
|
If
Mid-Americas
board of directors determined, in the exercise of the
directors fiduciary duty, to cancel the merger,
Mid-America
could be expected to be required to pay a termination fee of
$8 million to Pinnacle. In addition,
Mid-America
would have incurred significant financial costs in pursuing the
Pinnacle merger.
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
shareholders will own only about a third of the outstanding
Pinnacle shares after the merger, thus having a lesser ability
to influence the outcome of shareholder votes in the combined
company. As a result, they will have a diminished ability to
directly influence management decisions.
|
|
|
|
The market price of Pinnacle shares, while more liquid than
Mid-America
shares, will be more obviously subject to market fluctuations in
the stock markets in general and those related to financial
institutions and other financial companies in particular. This
may make the stock price rise or fall in ways that are not
predictable or correlated to Pinnacles financial
performance.
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
The merger will trigger payments of $5.7 million in total to
Gary Scott, Jason West, David Major and Sam Short at closing.
The payment of these amounts will not have an impact on the
consideration to be received by
Mid-America
shareholders in the merger, although they will have an impact on
Pinnacles future operations that, in the view of the
Mid-America
board, is not material.
|
|
|
|
There may be different interests between some officers and
directors in the merger and those of directors or
non-director
shareholders. As noted above, outstanding stock options and
restricted stock awards granted to directors and executive
officers will be accelerated.
Mid-Americas
executive management team holds change of control agreements
that will be triggered by completion of the merger.
Mr. West has entered into an employment agreement with
Pinnacle National Bank that will become effective upon the
closing of the merger and three
Mid-America
directors are expected to be offered seats on the Pinnacle board
of directors after the merger is completed. In addition, the
officers and employees of PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South
have been offered retention bonuses if they remain employed by
Pinnacle after the effective time of the merger (or if they are
discharged other than for cause) until the earlier of
December 31, 2008 or their position is eliminated.
Furthermore, the merger will result in accelerated vesting of
stock options, restricted shares and stock appreciation rights
granted to
Mid-America
directors, executive officers and employees.
|
|
|
|
If the merger is not completed, there could be reputational
damage to
Mid-America
as well as to Pinnacle. However, the board is not aware of any
circumstance that indicates that the transaction will not
receive shareholder approval.
|
|
|
|
There will be significant expenses in pursuing this proposed
transaction, including substantial fees to Hovde.
|
|
|
|
There can be no guarantees that Pinnacles financial or
stock price performance will remain as attractive as they have
been, in the opinion of the
Mid-America
board or that of Hovde, in the past.
|
There were other potential negative factors that could be
envisioned by the
Mid-America
board of directors, but the foregoing factors were the major
concerns reviewed by the board . Nonetheless, on balance, the
Mid-America
board of directors believed that the potential positives
outweighed the possible negative considerations surrounding the
proposed merger.
Material
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion summarizes the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger to holders of
Pinnacle common stock and
Mid-America
common stock.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Pinnacle
Shareholders. There will be no United States
federal income tax consequences to a holder of Pinnacle common
stock as a result of the merger.
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to
Mid-America
Shareholders. Subject to the qualifications and
limitations set forth above in the immediately preceding
paragraph, the material United States federal income tax
consequences of the merger to
Mid-America
shareholders will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a holder of
Mid-America
common stock will not recognize any gain or loss upon the
exchange of that shareholders shares of
Mid-America
common stock for shares of Pinnacle common stock in the merger;
however, a holder of
Mid-America
common stock will recognize gain on the receipt of any cash
consideration in the merger equal to the lesser of (i) the
amount by which the total merger consideration received by the
holder of
Mid-America
common stock exceeds the holders basis in the
Mid-America
common stock or (ii) the amount of the cash consideration
received in the merger. This gain generally will be a capital
gain and will be a long-term capital gain if the holding period
for the shares of
Mid-America
common stock exchanged for cash is more than one year at the
completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
to the extent that a holder of
Mid-America
common stock receives cash instead of a fractional share of
Pinnacle common stock, such holder will be required to recognize
gain or loss, measured by the difference between the amount of
cash received and the portion of the tax basis of that
holders shares of
Mid-America
common stock allocable to that fractional share of Pinnacle
common stock. This gain
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
or loss will be a capital gain or loss and will be a long-term
capital gain or loss if the holding period for the share of
Mid-America
common stock exchanged for cash instead of the fractional share
of Pinnacle common stock is more than one year at the completion
of the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a holder of
Mid-America
common stock will have a tax basis in the Pinnacle common stock
received in the merger equal to the tax basis of the
Mid-America
common stock surrendered by that holder in the merger, less the
amount of cash consideration received and increased by the
amount of any gain recognized; and
|
|
|
|
the holding period for shares of Pinnacle common stock received
in exchange for shares of
Mid-America
common stock in the merger will include the holding period for
the shares of
Mid-America
common stock surrendered in the merger.
|
In the case of a holder of
Mid-America
common stock who holds shares of
Mid-America
common stock with differing tax bases
and/or
holding periods, the preceding rules must be applied to each
identifiable block of
Mid-America
common stock.
This discussion addresses only those
Mid-America
shareholders that hold their
Mid-America
common stock as a capital asset and does not address all aspects
of federal income taxation that may be relevant to a holder of
Mid-America
common stock in light of that shareholders particular
circumstances or to a shareholder subject to special rules, such
as:
|
|
|
|
|
a shareholder that is not a citizen or resident of the United
States;
|
|
|
|
a financial institution or insurance company;
|
|
|
|
a mutual fund;
|
|
|
|
a tax-exempt organization;
|
|
|
|
a dealer or broker in securities or foreign currencies;
|
|
|
|
a trader in securities that elects to apply a mark-to-market
method of accounting;
|
|
|
|
a shareholder that holds its
Mid-America
common stock as part of a hedge, appreciated financial position,
straddle, conversion, or other risk reduction
transaction; or
|
|
|
|
a shareholder that acquired its
Mid-America
common stock pursuant to the exercise of options or similar
derivative securities or otherwise as compensation.
|
If a partnership holds
Mid-America
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership
will generally depend on the status of the partners and the
activities of the partnership. A partner in a partnership
holding
Mid-America
common stock should consult its tax advisor.
The following discussion is not binding on the Internal Revenue
Service. It is based on the Code, applicable Treasury
regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions,
each as in effect as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and all of which are subject to change,
possibly with retroactive effect. The tax consequences under
state, local and foreign laws and United States federal laws
other than United States federal income tax laws are not
addressed in this section.
Holders of
Mid-America
common stock are strongly urged to consult their tax advisors as
to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger,
including the applicability and effect of United States federal,
state and local and foreign income and other tax laws in light
of their particular circumstances.
General. Pinnacle and
Mid-America
have structured the merger to qualify as a reorganization for
United States federal income tax purposes. Prior to the
closing, each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will have received a written opinion from Bass,
Berry & Sims PLC to the effect that for United States
federal income tax purposes, the merger will constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a) of the
Code; and that no gain or loss will be recognized by Pinnacle or
Mid-America
as a result of the merger; and that no gain or loss will be
recognized by
Mid-Americas
shareholders with respect to the stock portion of the merger
consideration. Neither Pinnacle nor
Mid-America
intends to waive this condition. If the tax opinion to be
54
delivered as of the closing is materially different from the
opinions respecting the United States federal income tax
considerations expressed herein under the heading
Material United States Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
would not effect the merger without recirculating this document
after revising this discussion appropriately and resoliciting
the approvals of their shareholders. This opinion relies on
assumptions, including assumptions regarding the absence of
changes in existing facts and law and the completion of the
merger in the manner contemplated by the merger agreement, and
representations and covenants made by Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
including those contained in certificates of officers of
Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
The accuracy of those representations, covenants or assumptions
may affect the conclusions set forth in this opinion, in which
case the tax consequences of the merger could differ from those
discussed here. Opinions of counsel neither bind the IRS nor
preclude the IRS from adopting a contrary position. No ruling
has been or will be sought from the IRS on the tax consequences
of the merger.
This discussion is intended to provide only a general summary of
the material United States federal income tax consequences of
the merger, and is not a complete analysis or description of all
potential United States federal income tax consequences of the
merger. This discussion does not address tax consequences that
may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances.
In addition, it does not address any non-income tax or any
foreign, state or local tax consequences of the merger.
Accordingly, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
strongly urge each holder of Pinnacle common stock and
Mid-America
common stock to consult his or her tax advisor to determine the
particular United States federal, state or local or foreign
income or other tax consequences to that shareholder of the
merger.
Backup Withholding. Unless you comply with
certain reporting or certification procedures or are an
exempt recipient (in general, corporations and
certain other entities), you may be subject to a backup
withholding tax of 28% with respect to any cash payments
received in the merger. Foreign shareholders should consult
their tax advisors with respect to the application of
withholding rules to any cash payments received in the merger.
Reporting Requirements. If you receive
Pinnacle common stock as a result of the merger, you will be
required to retain records pertaining to the merger and will be
required to file with your United States federal income tax
return for the year in which the merger takes place a statement
setting forth certain facts relating to the merger.
Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of
the merger to you will depend on the facts of your particular
situation. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor
regarding the specific tax consequences of the merger, including
the applicability and effect of any federal, state, local and
foreign income and other tax laws.
Under Tennessee law, shareholders of
Mid-America
who deliver written notice of their intent to dissent and do not
vote in favor of the merger have the right to dissent and
receive the fair value of their
Mid-America
common stock in cash.
Mid-America
shareholders electing to exercise dissenters rights must
comply with the provisions of Chapter 23 of the TBCA in
order to perfect their rights. A copy of Chapter 23 of the
TBCA is attached as Appendix B to this proxy
statement.
The following is intended as a brief summary of the material
provisions of the Tennessee statutory procedures required to be
followed by a
Mid-America
shareholder in order to dissent from the merger and perfect the
shareholders dissenters rights. This summary,
however, is not a complete statement of all applicable
requirements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
Chapter 23 of the TBCA, the full text of which appears as
Appendix B of this proxy statement.
Holders of
Mid-America
common stock who do not want to accept the merger consideration,
who do not vote in favor of (or who abstain from voting on) the
merger agreement, and who perfect their dissenters rights
by complying with the provisions of Chapter 23 of the TBCA,
will have the right to receive cash payment for the fair
value of their
Mid-America
common stock.
55
In order to perfect dissenters rights with respect to the
merger, a
Mid-America
shareholder must (1) deliver to
Mid-America,
before the vote is taken, written notice of his or her intent to
demand payment for his or her shares of
Mid-America
common stock if the merger is consummated; and (2) not vote
his or her shares of
Mid-America
common stock in favor of the merger agreement. Subsequent to
shareholder approval of the merger agreement, Pinnacle would be
required under Tennessee law to send to each of the
Mid-America
shareholders who has perfected dissenters rights in
accordance with the steps disclosed above, written notice
setting forth instructions for receipt of payment for their
shares. Upon receipt of such notice, dissenting
Mid-America
shareholders would become entitled to receive payment of their
shares of
Mid-America
common stock when they: (1) demand payment;
(2) certify that they had received their shares prior to
the date of the first public announcement of Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
intention to merge; and (3) deposit with Pinnacle
certificates representing their shares of
Mid-America
common stock in accordance with the instructions set forth in
the notice.
Any
Mid-America
shareholder contemplating the exercise of dissenters
rights should carefully review Chapter 23 of the TBCA, a
copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as
Appendix B. A
Mid-America
shareholder who fails to comply with all requirements of such
Chapter 23 will forfeit his or her dissenters rights
and, upon consummation of the merger, that holders shares
of common stock will be converted into the right to receive the
merger consideration to which the shareholder is entitled under
the merger agreement.
In general, any dissenting shareholder who perfects his or her
right to be paid the fair value of the holders
Mid-America
common stock in cash will recognize taxable gain or loss for
federal income tax purposes upon receipt of any cash.
Shareholders of Pinnacle are not entitled to dissenters
rights in connection with the merger.
The merger will be accounted for as a purchase, as
that term is used under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for accounting and financial reporting purposes.
Mid-America
will be treated as the acquired corporation for accounting and
financial reporting purposes.
Mid-Americas
assets and liabilities will be adjusted to their estimated fair
value on the closing date of the merger and combined with the
historical book values of the assets and liabilities of
Pinnacle. Applicable income tax effects of these adjustments
will be included as a component of the combined companys
deferred tax assets or liabilities. The difference between the
estimated fair value of the assets (including separately
identifiable intangible assets, such as core deposit
intangibles) and liabilities and the purchase price will be
recorded as goodwill.
Interests
of Certain
Mid-America
Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger
Some of the members of
Mid-Americas
management and the
Mid-America
board of directors have financial and other interests in the
merger that are in addition to, or different from, their
interests as
Mid-America
shareholders generally.
Mid-Americas
board of directors was aware of these interests and considered
them, among other matters, in approving and adopting the merger
agreement.
Employment Relationships. It is expected that
shortly after completion of the merger, Bank of the South and
PrimeTrust will be consolidated with Pinnacle National Bank and
the current executives of PrimeTrust and Bank of the South will
be employees of Pinnacle National Bank. Except as covered by the
employment agreement between Pinnacle National Bank and Jason
West, which will become effective at the closing of the merger
and is described below, the
Mid-America,
PrimeTrust and Bank of the South employees who continue to be
employed by Pinnacle National Bank after the bank consolidation
will be employed on an at-will basis, and Pinnacle
National Bank will not be obligated to employ or retain the
service of any such person for any specific period of time or in
any specific position. Although they will not have employment
agreements with Pinnacle, it is expected that Gary Scott, David
Major and Sam Short will work for the combined company for at
least 12 months.
Jason K. West Employment
Agreement. Mr. West has entered into an
employment agreement with Pinnacle National Bank, which will be
effective upon the completion of the merger.
Mr. Wests employment
56
agreement provides that he will serve as the area executive of
Pinnacle National Bank for Cheatham, Dickson and portions of
Williamson Counties for a three-year term. Mr. Wests
agreement will automatically renew for an additional day each
day after the beginning of the term, so that it will always have
a three-year term, unless any of the parties to the agreement
gives notice of his or its intent not to renew the agreement.
Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. West will
receive a salary of $205,000 per year, plus benefits, and annual
bonus compensation as determined by the board of directors. The
employment agreement also contains a change of control
provision. If a change of control (as defined in the employment
agreement) occurs with respect to Pinnacle National Bank or
Pinnacle, Pinnacle National Bank will be obligated to pay
Mr. West 2.99 times his base salary plus targeted annual
incentive payments as well as three years of health insurance
benefits. In the event any payments or benefits paid by Pinnacle
National Bank to Mr. West would subject him to an excise
tax under Section 4999 of the Code, then he will be
entitled to such additional payments from Pinnacle National Bank
as required to put him in the same after-tax position as he
would be were he not subject to such excise tax.
If Pinnacle National Bank terminates Mr. Wests
employment without cause, he shall continue to receive all
compensation and health care benefits due to him as if he were
still employed from three years from such termination date. If
Mr. West terminates his employment for cause (as defined in
the employment agreement), he shall continue to receive all
compensation due to him as if he were still employed for the
lesser of the remaining term or twelve months from termination.
Mr. Wests employment agreement also provides that he
shall not engage in any activity or business in competition with
Pinnacle National Bank located within the geographic region in
which Mr. West rendered services for Pinnacle National Bank
for two years following the termination of his employment. Such
non-competition restriction will not apply in the event of a
change of control (subsequent to the merger) or if he is
terminated without cause.
Security Ownership of
Mid-America
Directors and Executive Officers. As of
October 9, 2007, the record date for determining those
Mid-America
shareholders entitled to vote their shares at the special
meeting, there were 14,229,523 shares of
Mid-America
common stock outstanding and entitled to vote, approximately
12.54% of which were owned and entitled to be voted by
Mid-America
directors and executive officers and their affiliates.
Acceleration of Vesting of Equity
Incentives. All of Mid-Americas outstanding
options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares will
vest upon consummation of the merger, including those options,
stock appreciation rights and restricted shares held by
Mid-Americas directors and executive officers. These
awards, which were granted in 2006, in connection with the
completion of Mid-Americas share exchange, were scheduled
to vest generally over 10 years. Instead, as a result of the
merger, these awards to directors and executive officers (with
an aggregate value of approximately $3.6 million (based upon the
value of the consideration paid by Pinnacle on the date the
merger was announced)) will vest at the effective time of the
merger.
Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance. Pinnacle has agreed to indemnify and
hold harmless each present and former director, officer and
employee of
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries following completion of the merger. This
indemnification covers liability and expenses arising out of
matters existing or occurring at or prior to the completion of
the merger to the fullest extent such persons would have been
indemnified as directors, officers or employees of
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries under existing indemnification
agreements
and/or
applicable law. This indemnification extends to liability
arising out of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. Pinnacle also has agreed that it will maintain a
policy of directors and officers liability insurance
coverage for the benefit of
Mid-Americas
directors and officers for six years following completion of the
merger.
Directors of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle Following the Merger. At the
effective time of the merger, Pinnacles board of directors
will be expanded by at least three members, and three members of
the existing
Mid-America
board of directors who are proposed by
Mid-Americas
nominating and corporate governance committee and reasonably
acceptable to Pinnacles nominating and corporate
governance committee and board of directors will fill three of
the expanded director positions. As members of the Pinnacle
board of directors,
57
the new directors who are not employees of Pinnacle can be
expected to receive $1,100 for each board meeting attended and
$900 for each committee meeting attended. In addition, these
non-employee directors also may receive equity awards under
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan similar to those
awarded to Pinnacles non-employee directors in 2007.
Additional Benefits. Other benefits which may
be paid to current employees, officers or directors of
Mid-America
that might not otherwise be paid if the merger does not occur
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-America,
PrimeTrust and Bank of the South have entered into change of
control agreements with each of Gary Scott, David Major, Jason
West and Sam Short, pursuant to which each of these executives
is entitled to receive a cash payment following a change of
control, in an amount equal to (1) $1.00 less than three
times the executives base amount of compensation as
defined in Section 280G of the Code; and (2) an amount
necessary to indemnify the executive for any excise tax payable
by the executive as a result of this payment. On August 15,
2007,
Mid-America,
PrimeTrust, Bank of the South and these four executives entered
into amendments to these agreements that provide that if the
merger is consummated in 2007, the executives will be paid their
change of control payment as if the merger was consummated
January 1, 2008. This would allow each executive to include
his 2007 compensation in his base amount calculation instead of
2001, which will increase the amount each executive is entitled
to under these change of control agreements. Payments under
these agreements are estimated (as of the date of the merger
agreement) at approximately $5.7 million in the aggregate,
or approximately $4.4 million, after tax, as a result of
the fact that approximately $2.3 million of the payments
are estimated to be nondeductible for tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PrimeTrust and Bank of the South will establish retention bonus
pools totaling approximately $5 million in the aggregate
that will be available for payment to the associates of each
bank that are employed both at the closing of the merger and on
December 31, 2008 or at such time as their position is
eliminated, if earlier.
|
|
|
|
PrimeTrust and Bank of the South have each entered into
agreements with certain of the banks associates in the
past. Outstanding balances owed PrimeTrust and Bank of the South
under these agreements totaling approximately $450,000 as of the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus will be forgiven
immediately prior to the closing of the merger.
|
|
|
|
Each of Gary Scott, David Major, Jason West and Sam Short has
entered into a business protection agreement with
Mid-America.
Under the terms of these agreements, each of Messrs. Scott,
Major, West and Short has agreed that he will not actively
participate or engage directly or indirectly in a competing
business in the Nashville MSA and the counties contiguous to the
Nashville MSA until the earlier of (1) voluntary retirement
after reaching age 65; (2) a transaction in which an
acquiror of
Mid-America
is subsequently acquired; (3) August 31, 2011; or
(4) the date that
Mid-America
terminates the agreement. In exchange for this agreement not to
compete, each executive is entitled to receive monthly payments
equal to the greater of his current or future monthly base
salary or $10,000 until the occurrence of one of these
termination events. Mr. Wests business projection
agreement will be superseded by his employment agreement with
Pinnacle National Bank upon the effectiveness of the merger.
|
Restrictions
on Resales by Affiliates
Shares of Pinnacle common stock to be issued to
Mid-America
shareholders in the merger have been registered under the
Securities Act and may be traded freely and without restriction
by those shareholders not deemed to be affiliates (as that term
is defined under the Securities Act) of
Mid-America.
Any subsequent transfer of shares, however, by any person who is
an affiliate of
Mid-America
at the time the merger is submitted for a vote of the
Mid-America
shareholders will, under existing law, require either:
|
|
|
|
|
the further registration under the Securities Act of the
Pinnacle common stock to be transferred;
|
|
|
|
compliance with Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities
Act, which permits limited sales under certain
circumstances; or
|
|
|
|
the availability of another exemption from registration.
|
58
An affiliate of
Mid-America
is a person who directly, or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with,
Mid-America.
These restrictions are expected to apply to the directors and
executive officers of
Mid-America
and the holders of 10% or more of the outstanding
Mid-America
common stock. The same restrictions apply to the spouses and
certain relatives of those persons and any trusts, estates,
corporations or other entities in which those persons have a 10%
or greater beneficial or equity interest. Pinnacle will give
stop transfer instructions to the transfer agent with respect to
the shares of Pinnacle common stock to be received by persons
subject to these restrictions, and the certificates for their
shares will be appropriately legended.
Each person who is an affiliate of
Mid-America
for purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act has
delivered to Pinnacle a written agreement intended to ensure
compliance with the Securities Act. The agreement also contains
a restriction limiting sales of
Mid-America
common stock only to transfers with affiliates or gifts without
consideration.
Each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended, and supervised and regulated by
the FRB. Both Pinnacles and
Mid-Americas
banking subsidiaries are supervised and regulated by various
federal and state banking authorities. Set forth below is a
brief summary of certain regulatory approvals needed to merge
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and the three bank subsidiaries. Additional information relating
to the supervision and regulation of Pinnacle is included in
Pinnacles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Additional information relating to the supervision and
regulation of
Mid-America
is included in
Mid-Americas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION beginning on
page 133.
Federal Reserve Regulatory Approval. The
merger is subject to prior approval by the FRB pursuant to
Section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act. Pinnacle has
filed the required applications and notification with the FRB
for approval of the merger. Assuming FRB approval, the parties
may not consummate the merger until after the termination of a
waiting period. The waiting period starts the day the FRB
approves the merger and notifies the United States Department of
Justice and ends 30 days later, except the waiting period
may be reduced to 15 days upon consent of the United States
Attorney General. During that time, the United States Department
of Justice may challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. The
FRB is prohibited from approving any transaction under the
applicable statutes that:
|
|
|
|
|
would result in a monopoly;
|
|
|
|
would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to
monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in
any part of the United States; or
|
|
|
|
may have the effect in any part of the United States of
substantially lessening competition, tending to create a
monopoly or otherwise resulting in a restraint of trade, unless
the FRB finds that the public interest created by the probable
effect of the transaction in meeting the convenience and needs
of the communities to be served clearly outweighs the
anticompetitive effects of the proposed merger.
|
In addition, the FRB will consider the financial and managerial
resources of the companies and their subsidiary banks and the
convenience and needs of the communities to be served.
Consideration of financial resources generally focuses on
capital adequacy, which is discussed below, and consideration of
managerial resources includes consideration of the competence,
experience and integrity of the officers, directors and
principal shareholders of the companies and their subsidiary
banks.
The analysis of convenience and needs issues includes the
parties performance under the Community Reinvestment Act
of 1977, as amended. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, the
FRB must take into account the record of performance of each of
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and their respective subsidiaries in meeting the credit needs of
the entire community, including the low- and moderate-income
neighborhoods in which they operate. Furthermore, applicable
federal law provides for the publication of notice and public
comment on applications filed with the FRB. The FRB frequently
receives comments and protests from
59
community groups and others and may, in its discretion, choose
to hold public hearings on the application. Any comments and
hearings could delay the regulatory approvals required for
consummation of the merger. Pinnacles subsidiary bank has
a satisfactory rating under the Community
Reinvestment Act. Each of
Mid-Americas
subsidiary banks has a satisfactory rating under the
Community Reinvestment Act.
State Regulatory Approval. The Tennessee
Banking Act requires submission of an application to and
approval from the Tennessee Department of Financial
Institutions, or the TDFI, for certain acquisitions of state
banks by Tennessee bank holding companies. The TDFI also must
take into consideration the financial and managerial resources
and future prospects of the company or companies and the banks
concerned. In the event Bank of the South and PrimeTrust Bank
are merged into Pinnacle National Bank simultaneously with the
merger of
Mid-America
into Pinnacle, approval of the TDFI is not required since the
only remaining bank subsidiary of the combined holding company
is a national bank.
We cannot guarantee you that the regulatory approvals described
above will be given without undue delay or the imposition by a
regulatory authority of a condition that would materially and
adversely impact the financial or economic benefits of the
merger on Pinnacle,
Mid-America
or any of their banking or nonbanking subsidiaries.
OPINIONS
OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS
Opinion
of Pinnacles Financial Advisor
By letter dated July 10, 2007, Pinnacle retained Sandler
ONeill to act as its financial advisor in connection with
a possible business combination with
Mid-America.
Sandler ONeill is a nationally recognized investment
banking firm whose principal business specialty is financial
institutions. In the ordinary course of its investment banking
business, Sandler ONeill is regularly engaged in the
valuation of financial institutions and their securities in
connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate
transactions.
Sandler ONeill acted as financial advisor to Pinnacle in
connection with the proposed transaction and participated in
certain of the negotiations leading to the execution of a
definitive merger agreement on August 15, 2007. At the
August 15, 2007 meeting at which Pinnacles board
considered and approved the merger agreement, Sandler
ONeill delivered to the board its oral opinion, that, as
of such date, the merger consideration was fair to Pinnacle from
a financial point of view. The full text of Sandler
ONeills opinion is attached as
Appendix C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The opinion outlines the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the
review undertaken by Sandler ONeill in rendering its
opinion. The description of the opinion set forth below is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the opinion. Sandler
ONeill urges Pinnacles shareholders to read the
entire opinion carefully in connection with their consideration
of the proposed merger.
Sandler ONeills opinion speaks only as of the date
of the opinion. The opinion was directed to the Pinnacle board
and is directed only to the fairness of the merger consideration
to Pinnacle from a financial point of view. It does not address
the underlying business decision of Pinnacle to engage in the
merger or any other aspect of the merger and is not a
recommendation to any Pinnacle shareholder as to how such
shareholder should vote at the special meeting with respect to
the merger or any other matter.
In connection with rendering its August 15, 2007 opinion,
Sandler ONeill reviewed and considered, among other things:
(1) the merger agreement;
(2) certain publicly available financial statements and
other historical financial information of Pinnacle that Sandler
ONeill deemed relevant;
(3) certain publicly available financial statements and
other historical financial information of
Mid-America
that Sandler ONeill deemed relevant;
(4) internal financial projections for Pinnacle for the
years ending December 31, 2007 through December 31,
2011;
60
(5) estimated financial projections for
Mid-America
for the years ending December 31, 2007 through
December 31, 2011 as provided by and reviewed with senior
management of Pinnacle;
(6) the pro forma financial impact of the merger on
Pinnacle, based on assumptions relating to transaction expenses,
purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings determined by
the senior management of Pinnacle;
(7) the publicly reported historical price and trading
activity for Pinnacles common stock;
(8) a comparison of certain selected financial and stock
market information for Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and similar publicly available information for certain other
companies the securities of which are publicly traded;
(9) the financial terms of certain recent business
combinations in the commercial banking industry, to the extent
publicly available;
(10) the current market environment generally and the
banking environment in particular; and
(11) such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
as Sandler ONeill considered relevant.
Sandler ONeill also discussed with certain members of the
senior management of Pinnacle, the business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects of both Pinnacle
and
Mid-America.
In performing its review, Sandler ONeill relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other
information that was available to them from public sources or
that was provided to Sandler ONeill by Pinnacle and
Mid-America
or their respective representatives and have assumed the
accuracy and completeness of this information for purposes of
rendering this opinion. Sandler ONeill further relied on
the assurances of the management of Pinnacle that management was
not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any of
this information inaccurate or misleading. Sandler ONeill
has not been asked to undertake, and has not undertaken, an
independent verification of any of such information and Sandler
ONeill does not assume any responsibility or liability for
the accuracy or completeness thereof. Sandler ONeill did
not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the specific
assets, the collateral securing the assets or the liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of Pinnacle or
Mid-America
or any of their subsidiaries, or the collectibility of any such
assets, nor has Sandler ONeill been furnished with any
evaluations or appraisals. Sandler ONeill did not make an
independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses of Pinnacle or
Mid-America
nor has Sandler ONeill reviewed any individual credit
files relating to Pinnacle or
Mid-America.
Sandler ONeill assumed, with Pinnacles consent, that
the respective allowances for loan losses for both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
were adequate to cover any losses.
With respect to the internal financial projections for Pinnacle
as provided by and discussed with the senior management of
Pinnacle and the financial projections for
Mid-America
as provided by and discussed with the senior management of
Pinnacle and used by Sandler ONeill in its analyses,
Pinnacles management confirmed to Sandler ONeill
that these projections reflected the best currently available
estimates and judgments of Pinnacles management of the
respective future financial performances of both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and Sandler ONeill assumed that such performances would be
achieved. With respect to the projections of transaction
expenses, purchase accounting adjustments and cost savings that
were determined by and reviewed with the senior management of
Pinnacle, management confirmed to Sandler ONeill that they
reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments
of such management and Sandler ONeill assumed that such
performances would be achieved. Sandler ONeill expressed
no opinion as to these financial projections or the assumptions
on which they are based. Sandler ONeill also assumed that
there has been no material change in Pinnacles or
Mid-Americas
assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or
prospects since the date of the most recent financial statements
made available to them. Sandler ONeill has assumed in all
respects material to its analysis that Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to its
analyses, that all of the representations and warranties
contained in the merger agreement and all related agreements are
true and correct, that each party to the agreements will perform
all of the covenants required to be performed by that party
under the agreements and, that the conditions
61
precedent in the agreements are not waived. Finally, with
Pinnacles consent, Sandler ONeill has relied upon
the advice Pinnacle has received from its legal, accounting and
tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters
relating to the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement.
Sandler ONeills opinion was necessarily based upon
financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect
on, and the information made available to Sandler ONeill
as of the date of its opinion. Events occurring after
August 15, 2007 could materially affect this opinion.
Sandler ONeill has not undertaken to update, revise,
reaffirm or withdraw its opinion or otherwise comment upon
events occurring after the date of its opinion. Sandler
ONeill expressed no opinion as to what the value of
Pinnacles common stock will be when issued to
Mid-Americas
shareholders pursuant to the merger agreement or the prices at
which the common stock of Pinnacle may trade at any time.
In rendering its August 15, 2007 opinion, Sandler
ONeill performed a variety of financial analyses. The
following is a summary of the material analyses performed by
Sandler ONeill, but is not a complete description of all
the analyses underlying Sandler ONeills opinion. The
summary includes information presented in tabular format. In
order to fully understand the financial analyses, these tables
must be read together with the accompanying text. The tables
alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial
analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process involving subjective judgments as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the
application of those methods to the particular circumstances.
The process, therefore, is not necessarily susceptible to a
partial analysis or summary description. Sandler ONeill
believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and
that selecting portions of the factors and analyses to be
considered without considering all factors and analyses, or
attempting to ascribe relative weights to some or all of these
factors and analyses, could create an incomplete view of the
evaluation process underlying its opinion. Also, no company
included in Sandler ONeills comparative analyses
described below is identical to Pinnacle or
Mid-America
and no transaction is identical to the merger. Accordingly, an
analysis of comparable companies or transactions involves
complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in
financial and operating characteristics of the companies and
other factors that could affect the public trading values or
merger transaction values, as the case may be, of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and the companies to which they are being compared.
In performing its analyses, Sandler ONeill also made
numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
business and economic conditions and various other matters, many
of which cannot be predicted and are beyond the control of
Pinnacle,
Mid-America
and Sandler ONeill. The analyses performed by Sandler
ONeill are not necessarily indicative of actual values or
future results, both of which may be significantly more or less
favorable than suggested by such analyses. Sandler ONeill
prepared its analyses solely for the purposes of rendering its
opinion and provided its analyses to the Pinnacle board at the
boards August 15, 2007 meeting. Estimates on the
values of companies do not purport to be appraisals or
necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their
securities may actually be sold. These estimates are inherently
subject to uncertainty and actual values may be materially
different. Accordingly, Sandler ONeills analyses do
not necessarily reflect the value of Pinnacles common
stock or the prices at which Pinnacles common stock may be
sold at any time. The analyses of Sandler ONeill and its
opinion were among a number of factors taken into consideration
by Pinnacles board in making its determination to approve
the merger agreement and the analyses described below should not
be viewed as determinative of the decision of Pinnacles
board or management with respect to the fairness of the merger.
At the August 15, 2007 meeting of Pinnacles board of
directors, Sandler ONeill presented certain financial
analyses of the merger. The summary below is not a complete
description of the analyses underlying the opinions of Sandler
ONeill or the presentation made by Sandler ONeill to
Pinnacles board, but is instead a summary of the material
analyses performed and presented in connection with the opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Sandler ONeill did not
attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that
it considered. Rather Sandler ONeill made qualitative
judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis
and factor. The financial analyses summarized below include
information presented in tabular format. Sandler ONeill
did not form an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or
factor (positive or negative) considered in isolation supported
or failed to support its respective opinions; rather Sandler
ONeill
62
made its determination as to the fairness of the per share
consideration on the basis of its experience and professional
judgment after considering the results of all its analyses taken
as a whole. Accordingly, Sandler ONeill believes that the
analysis and the summary of the analysis must be considered as a
whole and that selecting portions of the analysis and factors or
focusing on the information presented below in tabular format,
without considering all analyses and factors or the full
narrative description of the financial analyses, including
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying
Sandler ONeills analyses and opinions. The tables
alone do not constitute complete descriptions of the financial
analyses presented in the tables.
Summary of Proposal. Sandler ONeill
reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction. Based
on the terms of the proposed transaction, each share of
Mid-America
common stock will be exchanged for 0.4655 shares of
Pinnacle common stock and $1.50 in cash, equating to a
transaction value of $212.6 million. The aggregate
transaction value was based upon 13,933,066 common shares
outstanding, 260,000 restricted awards which vest upon a
change-of-control transaction and 1,205,829 options and stock
appreciation rights outstanding with a weighted-average strike
price of $7.98 for
Mid-America
as provided to Sandler ONeill. Based upon financial
information for
Mid-America
as of June 30, 2007, Sandler ONeill calculated the
following transaction ratios:
Transaction
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction Price/Last Twelve
Months Earnings per Share(1)
|
|
|
34.4
|
x
|
Transaction Price/Book Value(2)
|
|
|
195.5
|
%
|
Transaction Price/Tangible Book
Value(2)
|
|
|
252.3
|
%
|
Core Deposit Premium(2)(3)
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the September, 2006 closing of the merger of equals
creating
Mid-America,
last twelve months earnings per share is calculated based
on year-to-date June 30, 2007 results annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
The calculation of
Mid-Americas
per share value includes the 260,000 restricted stock awards
which immediately vest upon a change-of-control transaction. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes time deposits > $100,000 are non-core deposits. As
of June 30, 2007,
Mid-America
reported $322.4 million in non-core deposits. |
Comparable Company Analysis. Sandler
ONeill used publicly available information to perform a
comparison of selected financial and market trading information
for Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
Sandler ONeill compared selected financial information for
Mid-America
to a peer group of selected Southeast financial institutions,
which is referred to as the
Mid-America
Southeast Peer Group. The
Mid-America
Southeast Peer Group consisted of the following publicly traded
commercial banks headquartered in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina or Tennessee with total
assets between $800 million and $2.0 billion:
|
|
|
Appalachian Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
First South Bancorp, Inc.
|
BancTrust Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
FNB United Corp.
|
Bank of Granite Corporation
|
|
GB&T Bancshares, Inc.
|
BNC Bancorp
|
|
Omni Financial Services, Inc.
|
Capital Bank Corporation
|
|
PAB Bankshares, Inc.
|
CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc.
|
|
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.
|
Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
|
|
Savannah Bancorp, Inc.
|
Cooperative Bankshares, Inc.
|
|
Southern Community Financial
Corporation
|
Crescent Banking Company
|
|
TIB Financial Corp.
|
Fidelity Southern Corporation
|
|
Yadkin Valley Financial Corporation
|
First Security Group, Inc.
|
|
|
63
The analysis compared certain selected financial information for
Mid-America
and the high, low, mean and median publicly available financial
and market trading data for the
Mid-America
Southeast Peer Group. The table below sets forth the data for
Mid-America
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and the
median data for the
Mid-America
Southeast Peer Group as of and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2007, with pricing data as of August 10, 2007.
Comparable
Group Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Peer Group
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Total Assets (In millions)
|
|
$
|
1,069.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,170.0
|
|
Tangible Equity/Tangible Assets
|
|
|
7.77
|
%
|
|
|
7.60
|
%
|
Return on Average Assets
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
Return on Average Equity
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
|
|
9.48
|
%
|
Efficiency Ratio
|
|
|
73.73
|
%
|
|
|
61.33
|
%
|
Price/Tangible Book Value
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
173.42
|
%
|
Price/Last Twelve Months
Earnings per Share
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
x
|
Price/Estimated 2007 Earnings per
Share
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
x
|
Price/52-Week High
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
77.43
|
%
|
Market Capitalization (in
millions)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
$
|
140.4
|
|
Sandler ONeill also used publicly available information to
compare selected financial information for Pinnacle to a peer
group of financial institutions selected by Pinnacles
management, which is referred to as the Company Designated
Peer Group.
The Company Designated Peer Group consisted of the following
publicly traded commercial banks:
|
|
|
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
PrivateBancorp, Inc.
|
Cardinal Financial Corporation
|
|
Renasant Corporation
|
Cascade Bancorp
|
|
Seacoast Banking Corporation of
Florida
|
City Bank
|
|
Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
|
Enterprise Financial Services Corp
|
|
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
|
Fidelity Southern Corporation
|
|
Vineyard National Bancorp
|
Frontier Financial Corporation
|
|
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
|
Integrity Bancshares, Inc.(1)
|
|
West Coast Bancorp
|
Preferred Bank
|
|
Western Alliance Bancorporation
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Financial data as of or for the twelve months ended
March 31, 2007. |
64
The analysis compared financial information for Pinnacle and the
high, low, mean and median publicly available financial and
market trading data for the Company Designated Peer Group. The
table below sets forth the data for Pinnacle and the median data
for the Company Designated Peer Group as of and for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2007, with pricing data as of
August 10, 2007.
Comparable
Group Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Designated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Total Assets (in millions)
|
|
$
|
2,315.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,290.6
|
|
Tangible Equity/Tangible Assets
|
|
|
6.42
|
%
|
|
|
7.24
|
%
|
Return on Average Assets
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Return on Average Equity
|
|
|
8.62
|
%
|
|
|
12.97
|
%
|
Price/Tangible Book Value
|
|
|
307.26
|
%
|
|
|
223.44
|
%
|
Price/Last Twelve Months
Earnings per Share
|
|
|
20.9
|
x
|
|
|
15.5
|
x
|
Price/Estimated 2007 Earnings per
Share
|
|
|
19.8
|
x
|
|
|
15.1
|
x
|
Price/52-Week High
|
|
|
74.26
|
%
|
|
|
72.98
|
%
|
Market Capitalization (in
millions)
|
|
$
|
431.9
|
|
|
$
|
385.4
|
|
Stock Trading History. Sandler ONeill
reviewed the history of the publicly reported trading prices of
Pinnacles common stock for the one-year period ended
August 10, 2007 and the three-year period ended
August 10, 2007. Sandler ONeill also reviewed the
relationship between the movements in the price of
Pinnacles common stock and the movements in the prices of
the NASDAQ Bank Index, the Standard & Poors 500
Index and the indexed performance of the Company Designated Peer
Group. The composition of the respective Company Designated Peer
Group is discussed under the Comparable Group
Analysis section above.
During the one-year period ended August 10, 2007,
Pinnacles common stock outperformed the Company Designated
Peer Group and underperformed the other two indices to which it
was compared.
Pinnacles
One-Year Stock Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Index Value
|
|
|
Ending Index Value
|
|
|
|
August 10, 2006
|
|
|
August 10, 2007
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
83.32
|
%
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
92.86
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
114.30
|
|
Company Designated Peer Group(1)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
80.14
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refers to the Company Designated Peer Group outlined in the
Comparable Group Analysis section above. |
During the three-year period ended August 10, 2007,
Pinnacles common stock outperformed the NASDAQ Bank Index
and underperformed the Standard & Poors 500
Index and the Company Designated Peer Group,/LS.
Pinnacles
Three-Year Stock Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Index Value
|
|
|
Ending Index Value
|
|
|
|
August 10, 2004
|
|
|
August 10, 2007
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
122.19
|
%
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
107.37
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
138.78
|
|
Company Designated Peer Group(1)
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
127.98
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refers to the Company Designated Peer Group outlined in the
Comparable Group Analysis section above. |
65
Analysis of Selected Merger
Transactions. Sandler ONeill reviewed 25
merger transactions announced from January 1, 2007 through
August 10, 2007 involving Nationwide commercial banks as
the selling institution with announced transaction values
between $100.0 and $500.0 million. Sandler ONeill
also reviewed 9 merger transactions announced from
January 1, 2007 through August 10, 2007 involving
Southeast commercial banks as the selling institution with
announced transaction values between $100.0 and
$500.0 million. Sandler ONeill also reviewed 3 merger
transactions announced from January 1, 2006 through
August 10, 2007 involving Tennessee commercial banks as the
selling institution with announced transaction values greater
than $100.0 million. Sandler ONeill reviewed the
following multiples: transaction price to last twelve
months earnings per share, transaction price to stated
book value, transaction price to stated tangible book value, and
the core deposit premium. As illustrated in the following table,
Sandler ONeill compared the proposed merger multiples to
the median multiples of the aforementioned groups of comparable
transactions.
Comparable
Transaction Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nationwide
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle/Mid-
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Transaction Price/Last Twelve
Months Earnings per Share(1)
|
|
|
34.4
|
x
|
|
|
21.5
|
x
|
|
|
23.5
|
x
|
|
|
23.8
|
x
|
Transaction Price/Book Value(2)
|
|
|
195.5
|
%
|
|
|
270.0
|
%
|
|
|
331.5
|
%
|
|
|
340.6
|
%
|
Transaction Price/Tangible Book
Value(2)
|
|
|
252.3
|
%
|
|
|
295.3
|
%
|
|
|
358.4
|
%
|
|
|
344.7
|
%
|
Core Deposit Premium(2)(3)
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the September, 2006 closing of the merger of equals
creating
Mid-America,
last twelve months earnings per share is calculated based
on year-to-date June 30, 2007 results annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
The calculation of
Mid-Americas
per share value includes the 260,000 restricted stock awards
which immediately vest upon a change-of-control transaction. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes time deposits > $100,000 are non-core deposits. As
of June 30, 2007,
Mid-America
reported $322.4 million in non-core deposits. |
66
Present Value Analysis. Sandler ONeill
performed an analysis that estimated the net present value per
share through December 31, 2011, of
Mid-America
common stock under various circumstances, assuming
Mid-America
performed in accordance with the financial projections for 2007
through 2011 provided by the senior management of Pinnacle. To
approximate the terminal value of
Mid-Americas
common stock at December 31, 2011, Sandler ONeill
applied price to last twelve months earnings multiples of
10.0x to 20.0x and multiples of tangible book value ranging from
125% to 225%. The terminal values were then discounted to
present values using different discount rates ranging from 12.0%
to 16.0% chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding
required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of
Mid-America
common stock. In addition, the terminal value of
Mid-Americas
common stock at December 31, 2011, was calculated using the
same range of price to last twelve months earnings
multiples (10.0x 20.0x) applied to a range of
discounts and premiums to managements budget projections.
The range applied to the budgeted net income was 25% under
budget to 25% over budget, using a discount rate of 13.9% for
the tabular analysis. As illustrated in the following tables,
this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share for
Mid-Americas
common stock of $5.50 to $12.89 when applying the price/earnings
multiples to the matched budget, $6.36 to $13.42 when applying
multiples of tangible book value to the matched budget, and
$4.49 to $14.97 when applying the price/earnings multiples to
the -25% / +25% budget range.
Net
Present Value Earnings Per Share
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
10.0x
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
|
14.0x
|
|
|
16.0x
|
|
|
18.0x
|
|
|
20.0x
|
|
|
12.00%
|
|
$
|
6.45
|
|
|
$
|
7.74
|
|
|
$
|
9.03
|
|
|
$
|
10.31
|
|
|
$
|
11.60
|
|
|
$
|
12.89
|
|
13.00%
|
|
|
6.19
|
|
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
|
8.67
|
|
|
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
11.15
|
|
|
|
12.39
|
|
14.00%
|
|
|
5.95
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
|
|
|
9.52
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
|
11.91
|
|
15.00%
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
8.01
|
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
|
|
11.45
|
|
16.00%
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
|
|
8.81
|
|
|
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
11.01
|
|
Net
Present Value Tangible Book Value Per Share
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
125%
|
|
|
145%
|
|
|
165%
|
|
|
185%
|
|
|
205%
|
|
|
225%
|
|
|
12.00%
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
$
|
8.65
|
|
|
$
|
9.84
|
|
|
$
|
11.03
|
|
|
$
|
12.22
|
|
|
$
|
13.42
|
|
13.00%
|
|
|
7.16
|
|
|
|
8.31
|
|
|
|
9.45
|
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
|
11.74
|
|
|
|
12.89
|
|
14.00%
|
|
|
6.88
|
|
|
|
7.98
|
|
|
|
9.09
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
11.29
|
|
|
|
12.39
|
|
15.00%
|
|
|
6.62
|
|
|
|
7.68
|
|
|
|
8.74
|
|
|
|
9.79
|
|
|
|
10.85
|
|
|
|
11.91
|
|
16.00%
|
|
|
6.36
|
|
|
|
7.38
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
|
|
|
11.46
|
|
Net
Present Value Earnings Per Share
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Budget Variance
|
|
10.0x
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
|
14.0x
|
|
|
16.0x
|
|
|
18.0x
|
|
|
20.0x
|
|
|
−25.0%
|
|
$
|
4.49
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
$
|
6.29
|
|
|
$
|
7.19
|
|
|
$
|
8.09
|
|
|
$
|
8.98
|
|
−20.0%
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
9.58
|
|
−15.0%
|
|
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
7.13
|
|
|
|
8.15
|
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
−10.0%
|
|
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
|
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
−5.0%
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
|
|
|
7.97
|
|
|
|
9.10
|
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
|
|
11.38
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
8.39
|
|
|
|
9.58
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
|
|
11.98
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
11.32
|
|
|
|
12.58
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
9.22
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
|
|
11.86
|
|
|
|
13.18
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
6.89
|
|
|
|
8.27
|
|
|
|
9.64
|
|
|
|
11.02
|
|
|
|
12.40
|
|
|
|
13.78
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
11.50
|
|
|
|
12.94
|
|
|
|
14.37
|
|
25.0%
|
|
|
7.49
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
|
|
10.48
|
|
|
|
11.98
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
14.97
|
|
67
Sandler ONeill also performed an analysis that estimated
the net present value per share through December 31, 2011
of Pinnacle common stock under various circumstances, assuming
Pinnacle performed in accordance with the financial projections
for 2007 through 2011 provided by the senior management of
Pinnacle. To approximate the terminal value of Pinnacles
common stock at December 31, 2011, Sandler ONeill
applied price to last twelve months earnings multiples of
10.0x to 20.0x and multiples of tangible book value ranging from
150% to 300%. The terminal values were then discounted to
present values using different discount rates ranging from 11.0%
to 16.0% chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding
required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of
Pinnacle common stock. In addition, the terminal value of
Pinnacles common stock at December 31, 2011 was
calculated using the same range of price to last twelve
months earnings multiples (10.0x 20.0x)
applied to a range of discounts and premiums to
managements budget projections. The range applied to the
budgeted net income was 25% under budget to 25% over budget,
using a discount rate of 13.2% for the tabular analysis. As
illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an
imputed range of values per share for Pinnacles common
stock of $14.84 to $36.18 when applying the price/earnings
multiples to the matched budget, $15.51 to $37.83 when applying
multiples of tangible book value to the matched budget, and
$12.44 to $41.45 when applying the price/earnings multiples to
the -25% / +25% budget range. Sandler noted that as of
August 10, 2007, Pinnacles stock price was $27.78 and
a Pinnacle stock price of $29.00 per share was used to determine
the transactions fixed exchange ratio.
Net
Present Value Earnings Per Share
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
10.0x
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
|
14.0x
|
|
|
16.0x
|
|
|
18.0x
|
|
|
20.0x
|
|
|
11.00%
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
|
$
|
21.71
|
|
|
$
|
25.33
|
|
|
$
|
28.94
|
|
|
$
|
32.56
|
|
|
$
|
36.18
|
|
12.00%
|
|
|
17.37
|
|
|
|
20.85
|
|
|
|
24.32
|
|
|
|
27.80
|
|
|
|
31.27
|
|
|
|
34.75
|
|
13.00%
|
|
|
16.69
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
|
|
23.37
|
|
|
|
26.71
|
|
|
|
30.05
|
|
|
|
33.39
|
|
14.00%
|
|
|
16.04
|
|
|
|
19.25
|
|
|
|
22.46
|
|
|
|
25.67
|
|
|
|
28.88
|
|
|
|
32.09
|
|
15.00%
|
|
|
15.43
|
|
|
|
18.51
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
24.68
|
|
|
|
27.77
|
|
|
|
30.85
|
|
16.00%
|
|
|
14.84
|
|
|
|
17.80
|
|
|
|
20.77
|
|
|
|
23.74
|
|
|
|
26.71
|
|
|
|
29.67
|
|
Net
Present Value Tangible Book Value Per Share
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
150%
|
|
|
175%
|
|
|
200%
|
|
|
225%
|
|
|
250%
|
|
|
275%
|
|
|
300%
|
|
|
11.00%
|
|
$
|
18.91
|
|
|
$
|
22.07
|
|
|
$
|
25.22
|
|
|
$
|
28.37
|
|
|
$
|
31.52
|
|
|
$
|
34.67
|
|
|
$
|
37.83
|
|
12.00%
|
|
|
18.17
|
|
|
|
21.19
|
|
|
|
24.22
|
|
|
|
27.25
|
|
|
|
30.28
|
|
|
|
33.30
|
|
|
|
36.33
|
|
13.00%
|
|
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
20.36
|
|
|
|
23.27
|
|
|
|
26.18
|
|
|
|
29.09
|
|
|
|
32.00
|
|
|
|
34.91
|
|
14.00%
|
|
|
16.77
|
|
|
|
19.57
|
|
|
|
22.37
|
|
|
|
25.16
|
|
|
|
27.96
|
|
|
|
30.75
|
|
|
|
33.55
|
|
15.00%
|
|
|
16.13
|
|
|
|
18.82
|
|
|
|
21.50
|
|
|
|
24.19
|
|
|
|
26.88
|
|
|
|
29.57
|
|
|
|
32.26
|
|
16.00%
|
|
|
15.51
|
|
|
|
18.10
|
|
|
|
20.68
|
|
|
|
23.27
|
|
|
|
25.85
|
|
|
|
28.44
|
|
|
|
31.02
|
|
68
Net
Present Value Earnings Per Share
Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Budget Variance
|
|
10.0x
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
|
14.0x
|
|
|
16.0x
|
|
|
18.0x
|
|
|
20.0x
|
|
|
−25.0%
|
|
$
|
12.44
|
|
|
$
|
14.92
|
|
|
$
|
17.41
|
|
|
$
|
19.90
|
|
|
$
|
22.39
|
|
|
$
|
24.87
|
|
−20.0%
|
|
|
13.27
|
|
|
|
15.92
|
|
|
|
18.57
|
|
|
|
21.22
|
|
|
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
26.53
|
|
−15.0%
|
|
|
14.09
|
|
|
|
16.91
|
|
|
|
19.73
|
|
|
|
22.55
|
|
|
|
25.37
|
|
|
|
28.19
|
|
−10.0%
|
|
|
14.92
|
|
|
|
17.91
|
|
|
|
20.89
|
|
|
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
26.86
|
|
|
|
29.85
|
|
−5.0%
|
|
|
15.75
|
|
|
|
18.90
|
|
|
|
22.05
|
|
|
|
25.20
|
|
|
|
28.36
|
|
|
|
31.51
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
16.58
|
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
|
|
26.53
|
|
|
|
29.85
|
|
|
|
33.16
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
17.41
|
|
|
|
20.89
|
|
|
|
24.38
|
|
|
|
27.86
|
|
|
|
31.34
|
|
|
|
34.82
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
18.24
|
|
|
|
21.89
|
|
|
|
25.54
|
|
|
|
29.18
|
|
|
|
32.83
|
|
|
|
36.48
|
|
15.0%
|
|
|
19.07
|
|
|
|
22.88
|
|
|
|
26.70
|
|
|
|
30.51
|
|
|
|
34.32
|
|
|
|
34.18
|
|
20.0%
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
27.86
|
|
|
|
31.84
|
|
|
|
35.82
|
|
|
|
39.80
|
|
25.0%
|
|
|
20.73
|
|
|
|
24.87
|
|
|
|
29.02
|
|
|
|
33.16
|
|
|
|
37.31
|
|
|
|
41.45
|
|
In connection with its analyses, Sandler ONeill considered
and discussed with Pinnacles board how the present value
analyses would be affected by changes in the underlying
assumptions, including variations with respect to net income.
Sandler ONeill noted that the terminal value analysis is a
widely used valuation methodology, but the results of such
methodology are highly dependent upon the numerous assumptions
that must be made, and the results thereof are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or future results.
Pro Forma Merger Analysis. Sandler
ONeill analyzed certain potential pro forma effects of the
merger, assuming the following: (i) the merger closes on
March 31, 2008; (ii) 100.0% of
Mid-Americas
shares are exchanged for a combination of $21.3 million in
cash and 6,607,117 shares of Pinnacle common stock;
(iii) Pinnacle and
Mid-America
financial projections for 2007 through 2011 as provided by and
reviewed with the senior management of Pinnacle; (iv) the
purchase accounting adjustments, transaction costs and charges
associated with the merger and cost savings determined by the
senior management of Pinnacle.
For the nine months ending December 31, 2008 and for the
years ending December 31, 2009 2011, Sandler
ONeill compared the diluted earnings per share of Pinnacle
common stock to the diluted earnings per share, on a GAAP basis,
of the combined company using the foregoing assumptions. The
analyses indicated that the merger would be accretive to
Pinnacles diluted earnings per share for all periods
examined. The actual results achieved by the combined company
may vary from projected results and the variations may be
material.
Miscellaneous. Pinnacle has agreed to pay
Sandler ONeill a transaction fee in connection with the
merger of $750,000, of which $200,000 has been paid and the
balance of which is contingent, and payable, upon closing of the
merger. Pinnacle has also agreed to reimburse certain of Sandler
ONeill reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with its engagement and to
indemnify Sandler ONeill and its affiliates and their
respective partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, and
controlling persons against certain expenses and liabilities,
including liabilities under the securities laws.
In the ordinary course of their respective broker and dealer
businesses, Sandler ONeill may purchase securities from
and sell securities to Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and their affiliates. Sandler ONeill may also actively
trade the debt
and/or
equity securities of Pinnacle or
Mid-America
or their affiliates for their own accounts and for the accounts
of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long
or short position in such securities.
Opinion
of
Mid-Americas
Financial Advisor
Hovde has delivered to the board of directors of
Mid-America
its opinion that, based upon and subject to the various
considerations set forth in its written opinion dated
August 15, 2007, the consideration received by the holders
of
Mid-America
common stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to
Mid-America
and the holders of
Mid-America
Common Stock as of that date. In requesting Hovdes advice
and opinion, no limitations were imposed by
Mid-America
upon Hovde with respect to the investigations made or procedures
69
followed by it in rendering its opinion. The full text of the
opinion of Hovde, dated August 15, 2007, which describes
the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered
and limitations on the review undertaken, is attached hereto as
Appendix D, and is incorporated in this document by
reference. The shareholders of
Mid-America
should read this opinion in its entirety.
Hovde is a nationally recognized investment banking firm and, as
part of its investment banking business, is continually engaged
in the valuation of financial institutions in connection with
mergers and acquisitions, private placements and valuations for
other purposes. As a specialist in securities of financial
institutions, Hovde has experience in, and knowledge of, banks,
thrifts and bank and thrift holding companies.
Mid-Americas
board selected Hovde to act as its financial advisor in
connection with the merger on the basis of the firms
reputation and expertise in transactions like the merger.
Based on the total consideration value at the time of the
execution of the definitive agreement, Hovde will receive a fee
totaling approximately $2.2 million, $2.0 million of
which is contingent upon the completion of the merger, for
services rendered in connection with advising
Mid-America
regarding the merger. Hovde will receive the contingent portion
of the fee upon the close of the transaction.
Hovdes opinion is directed only to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the total transaction consideration,
and, as a result, does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of
Mid-America
as to how that shareholder should vote at the
Mid-America
special shareholders meeting. The summary of the opinion
of Hovde set forth in this joint statement/prospectus is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
opinion, attached hereto as Appendix D.
The following is a summary of the analyses performed by Hovde in
connection with its fairness opinion. Certain of these analyses
were confirmed in a presentation to the board of directors of
Mid-America
by Hovde on August 15, 2007, which analyses were confirmed
in Hovdes written opinion, dated August 15, 2007. The
summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete
description of either the analyses performed by Hovde in
rendering its opinion or the presentation delivered by Hovde to
the board of directors of
Mid-America,
but it does summarize all of the material analyses performed and
presented by Hovde.
The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods
of financial analyses and the application of those methods to
the particular circumstances. In arriving at its opinion, Hovde
did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis and
factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments
as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and
factor. Accordingly, Hovde believes that its analyses and the
following summary must be considered as a whole and that
selecting portions of its analyses, without considering all
factors and analyses, could create an incomplete view of the
process underlying the analyses set forth in its report to
Mid-Americas
board and its fairness opinion.
In performing its analyses, Hovde made numerous assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business and economic
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle. The analyses performed by Hovde are not
necessarily indicative of actual value or actual future results,
which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested
by these analyses. These analyses were prepared solely as part
of Hovdes analysis of the fairness of the transaction
consideration, from a financial point of view, to the
shareholders of
Mid-America.
The analyses do not purport to be an appraisal or to reflect the
prices at which a company might actually be sold or the prices
at which any securities may trade at the present time or at any
time in the future. Hovdes opinion does not address the
relative merits of the merger as compared to any other business
combination in which
Mid-America
might engage. In addition, as described above, Hovdes
opinion to
Mid-America
was one of many factors taken into consideration by the board of
directors of
Mid-America
in adopting the merger agreement.
70
During the course of its engagement, and as a basis for arriving
at its opinion, Hovde reviewed, evaluated and analyzed material
bearing upon the financial and operating conditions of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle and material prepared in connection with the
merger, including, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
certain historical publicly available business and financial
information concerning
Mid-America
and Pinnacle;
|
|
|
|
certain internal financial statements and other financial and
operating data concerning
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
certain financial projections prepared by the managements of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle;
|
|
|
|
discussions with members of the senior managements of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle for the purpose of reviewing the future prospects
of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle, including financial forecasts related to the
respective businesses, earnings, assets, liabilities and the
amount and timing of cost savings, which are referred to below
as the synergies, expected to be achieved as a
result of the merger;
|
|
|
|
historical market prices and trading volumes of Pinnacle common
stock;
|
|
|
|
the terms of recent merger and acquisition transactions, to the
extent publicly available, involving banks, thrifts and bank and
thrift holding companies that Hovde considered relevant;
|
|
|
|
the pro forma ownership of the Pinnacle common stock by the
shareholders of
Mid-America
relative to the pro forma contribution of the
Mid-Americas
assets, liabilities, equity and earnings to the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the pro forma impact of the merger on the combined
companys earnings per share, consolidated capitalization
and financial ratios; and
|
|
|
|
those other analyses and factors as Hovde deemed appropriate.
|
Hovde also took into account its assessment of general economic,
market and financial conditions and its experience in other
transactions, as well as its knowledge of the commercial banking
industry and its general experience in securities valuations.
In rendering its opinion, Hovde assumed, without independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and
other information and relied upon the accuracy of the
representations of the parties contained in the merger
agreement. Hovde also assumed that the financial forecasts
furnished to or discussed with Hovde by
Mid-America
and Pinnacle were reasonably prepared and reflected the best
currently available estimates and judgments of senior management
of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle as to the future financial performance of
Mid-America,
Pinnacle, or the combined company, as the case may be. Hovde has
not made any independent evaluation or appraisal of any
properties, assets or liabilities of
Mid-America
or Pinnacle. Hovde assumed and relied upon the accuracy and
completeness of the publicly available and other non-public
financial information provided to it by
Mid-America
and Pinnacle, relied upon the representations and warranties of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle made pursuant to the merger agreement, and did not
independently attempt to verify any of such information.
71
Analysis of Selected Mergers. As part of its
analysis, Hovde reviewed three groups of comparable merger
transactions. The first peer group included transactions, which
have occurred since January 1, 2005, that involved target
banks and thrifts in the entire United States that had total
assets between $500 million and $2 billion, with a
return on average assets of between 0.50% and 1.00%, which is
referred to as the Nationwide Merger Group. This
Nationwide Merger Group consisted of the following 24
transactions:
|
|
|
Buyer
|
|
Seller
|
|
United Community Finl Corp. (OH)
|
|
PVF Capital Corp. (OH)
|
Colonial BancGroup Inc. (AL)
|
|
Citrus & Chemical Bancorp.
(FL)
|
Banco Popular Español SA
|
|
Total Bancshares Corp. (FL)
|
BancTrust Financial Group Inc. (AL)
|
|
Peoples BancTrust Co. (AL)
|
LSB Bancshares Inc. (NC)
|
|
FNB Financial Services Corp. (NC)
|
Marshall & Ilsley Corp. (WI)
|
|
Excel Bank Corporation (MN)
|
Renasant Corp. (MS)
|
|
Capital Bancorp Inc. (TN)
|
United Bankshares Inc. (WV)
|
|
Premier Community Bankshares (VA)
|
Greene County Bancshares Inc. (TN)
|
|
Civitas BankGroup (TN)
|
Royal Bank of Scotland Group
|
|
GreatBanc Inc. (IL)
|
Washington Federal Inc. (WA)
|
|
First Fed Banc of the SW Inc (NM)
|
Prosperity Bancshares Inc. (TX)
|
|
Texas United Bancshares Inc. (TX)
|
Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc. (TX)
|
|
Summit Bancshares Inc. (TX)
|
U.S. Bancorp (MN)
|
|
Vail Banks Inc. (CO)
|
Mercantile Bankshares Corp. (MD)
|
|
James Monroe Bancorp Inc. (VA)
|
National Bancshares Inc. (IA)
|
|
Metrocorp Inc. (IL)
|
National City Corp. (OH)
|
|
Forbes First Financial Corp. (MO)
|
FNB Corp. (NC)
|
|
Integrity Financial Corp (NC)
|
New York Community Bancorp (NY)
|
|
Long Island Financial Corp. (NY)
|
MAF Bancorp Inc. (IL)
|
|
EFC Bancorp Inc. (IL)
|
FLAG Financial Corp. (GA)
|
|
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. (GA)
|
Associated Banc-Corp (WI)
|
|
State Financial Services Corp. (WI)
|
Willow Grove Bncp Inc. (PA)
|
|
Chester Valley Bancorp Inc. (PA)
|
72
Hovde then reviewed comparable mergers involving banks and
thrifts headquartered in the Southeast United States (MS, AL,
GA, FL, TN, SC, NC, VA and AR) announced since January 1,
2004, in which the total assets of the seller were between
$500 million and $2 billion, and a return on average
assets of less than 1.00%, which we refer to as the
Southeastern Merger Group. This Southeastern Merger
Group consisted of the following 21 transactions:
|
|
|
Buyer
|
|
Seller
|
|
First Banks, Inc. (MO)
|
|
Coast Financial Holdings Inc. (FL)
|
Colonial BancGroup Inc. (AL)
|
|
Citrus & Chemical Bancorp.
(FL)
|
Banco Popular Español SA
|
|
Total Bancshares Corp. (FL)
|
BancTrust Financial Group Inc. (AL)
|
|
Peoples BancTrust Co. (AL)
|
LSB Bancshares Inc. (NC)
|
|
FNB Financial Services Corp. (NC)
|
Renasant Corp. (MS)
|
|
Capital Bancorp Inc. (TN)
|
United Bankshares Inc. (WV)
|
|
Premier Community Bankshares (VA)
|
Greene County Bancshares Inc. (TN)
|
|
Civitas BankGroup (TN)
|
IBERIABANK Corp. (LA)
|
|
Pocahontas Bancorp Inc. (AR)
|
Banc Corp. (AL)
|
|
Community Bancshares Inc. (AL)
|
Mercantile Bankshares Corp. (MD)
|
|
James Monroe Bancorp Inc. (VA)
|
FNB Corp. (NC)
|
|
Integrity Financial Corp (NC)
|
FLAG Financial Corp. (GA)
|
|
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. (GA)
|
Colonial BancGroup Inc. (AL)
|
|
FFLC Bancorp Inc. (FL)
|
Home Bancshares Inc. (AR)
|
|
TCBancorp Inc. (AR)
|
Popular Inc. (PR)
|
|
Kislak Financial Corp. (FL)
|
Peoples Holding Co. (MS)
|
|
Heritage Financial Hldg Corp (AL)
|
First Natl Bkshs of FL (FL)
|
|
Southern Community Bancorp (FL)
|
South Financial Group Inc. (SC)
|
|
Florida Banks Inc. (FL)
|
SouthTrust Corp. (AL)
|
|
FloridaFirst Bancorp Inc. (FL)
|
South Financial Group Inc. (SC)
|
|
CNB Florida Bancshares Inc. (FL)
|
Hovde also reviewed comparable mergers involving banks and
thrifts headquartered in Tennessee that have announced since
July 1, 2001, excluding Mississippi acquirors, which we
refer to as the Tennessee Merger Group. This
Tennessee Merger Group consisted of the following seven
transactions:
|
|
|
Buyer
|
|
Seller
|
|
Community First Inc. (TN)
|
|
First Natl Bk of Centerville (TN)
|
Greene County Bancshares Inc. (TN)
|
|
Civitas BankGroup (TN)
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners (TN)
|
|
Cavalry Bancorp Inc. (TN)
|
Greene County Bancshares Inc. (TN)
|
|
Independent Bankshares Corp. (TN)
|
First South Bancorp, Inc. (TN)
|
|
Murfreesboro Bancorp, Inc. (TN)
|
Fifth Third Bancorp (OH)
|
|
Franklin Financial Corp. (TN)
|
Synovus Financial Corp. (GA)
|
|
Community Financial Group Inc.
(TN)
|
73
Hovde calculated the averages of the following relevant
transaction ratios in the Nationwide Merger Group, the
Southeastern Merger Group and the Tennessee Merger Group: the
percentage of the offer value to the acquired companys
total assets; the multiple of the offer value to the acquired
companys tangible book value; the multiple of the offer
value to the acquired companys earnings for the twelve
months preceding the announcement date of the transaction; and
the tangible book value premium to core deposits. Hovde compared
these multiples with the corresponding multiples for the merger,
valuing the total consideration that would be received pursuant
to the merger agreement at approximately $199.2 million, or
$13.54 per
Mid-America
diluted share. In calculating the multiples for the merger,
Hovde used
Mid-Americas
earnings for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007,
and
Mid-Americas
tangible book value per share, total assets, and total deposits
as of June 30, 2007. The results of this analysis are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
Preceding
|
|
|
Premium to
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Core Deposits
|
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
(x)
|
|
|
(x)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
Nationwide Merger Group average
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
Southeastern Merger Group average
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
Tennessee Merger Group average
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Hovde estimated
the present value of all shares of
Mid-America
common stock by estimating the value of
Mid-Americas
estimated future earnings stream beginning in 2007. Reflecting
Mid-Americas
internal projections, Hovde assumed net income in 2007, 2008,
2009, 2010, and 2011 of $7.9 million, $10.1 million,
$12.4 million, $14.2 million, and $17.0 million,
respectively. The present value of these earnings was calculated
based on a range of discount rates of 12.0%, 13.0%, and 14.0%,
respectively. In order to derive the terminal value of
Mid-Americas
earnings stream beyond 2011, Hovde assumed a terminal value
based on a terminal growth rate of 5% applied to earnings. The
present value of this terminal amount was then calculated based
on the range of discount rates mentioned above. These rates and
values were chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding
the required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of
Mid-America
common stock. This analysis and its underlying assumptions
yielded a range of values for each diluted share of
Mid-America
stock of approximately $10.84 per diluted share (at a 14.0%
discount rate) to $13.86 per diluted share (at a 12.0% discount
rate) with a midpoint of $12.16 per diluted share (using a 13.0%
discount rate), compared to per share merger consideration of
$13.54 per diluted share.
74
Ability-to-Pay Dilution Analysis. In addition,
Hovde reviewed a group of publicly traded banks or bank holding
companies and their ability to acquire
Mid-America
in a 90% stock and 10% cash transaction with zero dilution to
the acquirors earnings per share. This analysis assumed
Mid-Americas
2007 estimated earnings of $7.9 million, cost savings of
24%, 3% of core deposits to be amortized over 8 years using
the straight-line method, and the
give-up
yield on cash of 6.5%. The analysis then applied the publicly
traded companies estimated forward earnings
price-to-earnings multiples to the net earnings contribution of
Mid-America
to arrive at a range of hypothetical deal values. The average of
these hypothetical deal values, $145.0 million or $10.03
per diluted share, was then in turn compared to deal value of
the merger of $199.2 million or $13.54 per diluted share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical Deal
|
|
Company
|
|
Value ($mm)
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
187.2
|
|
Synovus Financial Corp.
|
|
$
|
164.7
|
|
United Community Banks, Inc.
|
|
$
|
162.9
|
|
Fifth Third Bancorp
|
|
$
|
161.7
|
|
BancorpSouth, Inc.
|
|
$
|
155.8
|
|
Green Bankshares, Inc.
|
|
$
|
149.4
|
|
Park National Corporation
|
|
$
|
148.3
|
|
Trustmark Corporation
|
|
$
|
148.2
|
|
Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation
|
|
$
|
144.7
|
|
National City Corporation
|
|
$
|
140.2
|
|
Renasant Corporation
|
|
$
|
139.0
|
|
U.S. Bancorp
|
|
$
|
137.4
|
|
BB&T Corporation
|
|
$
|
136.5
|
|
KeyCorp
|
|
$
|
135.0
|
|
Regions Financial Corporation
|
|
$
|
127.1
|
|
Integra Bank Corporation
|
|
$
|
115.0
|
|
Wachovia Corporation
|
|
$
|
112.6
|
|
Contribution Analysis. Hovde prepared a
contribution analysis showing percentages of total assets, total
net loans, total deposits, total equity, and tangible equity at
June 30, 2007 for
Mid-America
and for Pinnacle, as well the estimated fiscal year 2007
earnings, estimated fiscal year 2008 earnings and estimated
fiscal year 2009 earnings that would be contributed to the
combined company on a pro-forma basis by
Mid-America
and Pinnacle. This analysis indicated that holders of
Mid-America
common stock would own approximately 30.8% of the pro forma
common shares outstanding of Pinnacle, assuming an exchange
ratio of 0.4655, while contributing an average of 29.8% of the
financial components listed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
|
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
|
to Pinnacle
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
Total net loans
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
Total equity
|
|
|
28.3
|
%
|
Total tangible equity
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
Net income estimated
fiscal year 2007
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
Net income estimated
fiscal year 2008
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
Net income estimated
fiscal year 2009
|
|
|
26.1
|
%
|
Average
Mid-America
Contribution Percentage
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
Actual
Mid-America
Pro Forma Ownership
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
75
Financial Implications to
Mid-America
Shareholders. Hovde prepared an analysis of the
financial implications of Pinnacles offer to a holder of
Mid-America
common stock. Hovde estimated the standalone and pro forma
earnings per share, book value per share, tangible book value
per share and dividends per share. These estimates were made for
the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. The table below summarizes
the accretion/dilution results for each of the years discussed
above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Mid-America
Standalone
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
% Accretion Dilution
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Mid-America
Standalone
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
% Accretion Dilution
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value per Share
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Mid-America
Standalone
|
|
$
|
8.25
|
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
|
$
|
9.65
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
|
|
11.56
|
|
|
|
12.96
|
|
% Accretion Dilution
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible Book Value per Share
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Mid-America
Standalone
|
|
$
|
6.59
|
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
|
|
8.91
|
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
% Accretion Dilution
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per Share
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Mid-America
Standalone
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
% Accretion Dilution
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Rate of Return Analysis. Hovde estimated the
rates of returns for four different scenarios;
Mid-America
standalone,
Mid-America
affiliates in 5 years,
Mid-America
affiliates with Pinnacle, and
Mid-America
affiliates with Pinnacle and the pro forma company is acquired.
For the standalone scenario, which is referred to as
Status Quo, it is assumed that the
Mid-America
stock trades in the stock market on December 31, 2011 at
15x earnings per share, or EPS, and the current
Mid-America
stock price is based on the most recent trading price. The
Status Quo scenario yielded an annual return of investment of
15.26%. For the second scenario, which is referred to as
Affiliation in 5 Years, it is assumed that
Mid-America
affiliates with a merger partner on December 31, 2011 at
22x EPS, which yielded an annual return of investment of 30.96%.
The third scenario, which is referred to as Affiliation
Today, assumes
Mid-America
affiliates with Pinnacle in 2007 and the pro forma stock sells
in the market on December 31, 2011 at 20x EPS. The
Affiliation Today scenario yielded an annual return of
investment of 34.48%. The fourth scenario, which is referred to
as Double Dip, assumed
Mid-America
affiliates with Pinnacle in 2007 and the pro forma company is
acquired on December 31, 2011 at 23x EPS. The Double Dip
scenario yielded an annual return of investment of 40.89%.
76
Comparable Company Analysis. Using publicly
available information, Hovde compared stock market valuation of
Pinnacle with a comparable company group consisting of the
following United States publicly traded high growth banking
institutions:
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name
|
|
Assets ($mm)
|
|
|
Wintrust Financial Corporation (IL)
|
|
|
9,348
|
|
East West Bancorp, Inc. (CA)
|
|
|
10,829
|
|
CVB Financial Corp. (CA)
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
Boston Private Financial Holdings,
Inc. (MA)
|
|
|
5,939
|
|
PrivateBancorp, Inc. (IL)
|
|
|
4,486
|
|
CoBiz Financial Inc. (CO)
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MI)
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
Indications of this stock market valuation included closing
stock market information as of August 13, 2007. Selected
market information for Pinnacle and the group of comparable
companies that was analyzed is provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wkly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD
|
|
3 Mo.
|
|
Vol/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price/
|
|
Price/
|
|
Price/
|
|
Price/
|
|
Price/
|
|
Mkt
|
|
Price
|
|
Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Inside
|
|
Institl
|
|
|
Book
|
|
TBV
|
|
LTM
|
|
07 EPS
|
|
08 EPS
|
|
Value
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Out
|
|
Ownrshp
|
|
Ownrshp
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
(%)
|
|
EPS(x)
|
|
(x)
|
|
(x)
|
|
($mm)
|
|
(%)
|
|
(%)
|
|
(%)
|
|
(%)
|
|
(%)
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
151.6
|
|
|
|
286.2
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
402.2
|
|
|
|
(16.27
|
)
|
|
|
(5.03
|
)
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
14.05
|
|
|
|
33.59
|
|
Comparable Company Average
|
|
|
175.3
|
|
|
|
265.7
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
888.3
|
|
|
|
(18.10
|
)
|
|
|
(11.53
|
)
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
11.73
|
|
|
|
60.55
|
|
Subject to the foregoing and based on Hovdes experience
as investment bankers, its activities and assumptions as
described above, and other factors Hovde has deemed relevant,
Hovde is of the opinion as of the date hereof that the
consideration received by the holders of
Mid-America
common stock is fair, from a financial point of view, to
Mid-America
and the holders of
Mid-America
common stock.
77
The following is a summary of the material terms of the
merger agreement. This summary does not purport to describe all
the terms of the merger agreement and is qualified by reference
to the complete merger agreement which is attached as
Appendix A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and incorporated herein by reference. All shareholders of
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
are urged to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety as it is the legal document that governs the merger.
Under the merger agreement,
Mid-America
will merge with and into Pinnacle with Pinnacle continuing as
the surviving company.
The merger agreement provides that, at the effective time of the
merger, each share of
Mid-America
common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger, but excluding shares of
Mid-America
common stock owned by Pinnacle or
Mid-America
(other than those shares held in a fiduciary or representative
capacity), will be converted into 0.4655 shares of Pinnacle
common stock plus $1.50 in cash. Based upon the
14,229,523 shares of
Mid-America
common stock outstanding as of October 9, 2007 (including
234,000 shares of restricted stock), Pinnacle will issue
approximately 6.6 million shares of Pinnacle common stock
and pay approximately $21.3 million in cash at the closing.
Fractional shares will not be issued by Pinnacle, but instead
will be paid in cash based on the average closing price for
Pinnacles common stock for the five trading days
immediately preceding the closing date.
Treatment
of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
Each outstanding option to acquire
Mid-America
common stock or stock appreciation right to be settled in shares
of
Mid-America
common stock granted under
Mid-Americas
or its predecessors stock option and incentive plans will
accelerate and be converted automatically at the effective time
of the merger into an option to purchase Pinnacle common stock
or stock appreciation right to be settled in shares of Pinnacle
common stock, as the case may be, and will continue to be
governed by the terms of the
Mid-America,
Bank of the South or PrimeTrust Bank stock plan and related
grant agreements under which it was granted, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Pinnacle common stock subject to the new
Pinnacle stock option or stock appreciation right will be equal
to the product of the number of shares of
Mid-America
common stock subject to the
Mid-America
stock option or stock appreciation right and 0.4655, rounded to
the nearest whole share; and
|
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of Pinnacle common stock subject to
the new Pinnacle stock option or stock appreciation right will
be equal to the exercise price per share of
Mid-America
common stock under the
Mid-America
stock option or stock appreciation right less $1.50 divided by
0.4655, rounded to the nearest cent.
|
In any event, stock options that are intended to be incentive
stock options under the Code will be adjusted in the manner
prescribed by the Code.
Following consummation of the merger, and if no
Mid-America
stock options or stock appreciation rights are exercised prior
to the effective time, the outstanding
Mid-America
options will be converted into 544,742 Pinnacle options at
exercise prices ranging from $6.61 to $20.41 and the outstanding
Mid-America
stock appreciation rights will be converted into 16,572 Pinnacle
stock appreciation rights with the exercise prices ranging from
$15.59 to $21.37.
Exchange
of Certificates in the Merger
Before the effective time of the merger, Pinnacle will appoint
an exchange agent to handle the exchange of
Mid-America
stock certificates for shares of Pinnacle common stock (which
shares will be in uncertificated
78
book-entry form unless a physical certificate is requested by a
holder) and the payment of cash for fractional shares. Promptly
after the effective time of the merger, the exchange agent will
send a letter of transmittal, which is to be used to exchange
Mid-America
stock certificates for shares of Pinnacle common stock, to each
former
Mid-America
shareholder who holds one or more stock certificates. The letter
of transmittal will contain instructions explaining the
procedure for surrendering
Mid-America
stock certificates. You should not return certificates with
the enclosed proxy card.
Mid-America
shareholders who surrender their stock certificates, together
with a properly completed letter of transmittal, will receive
shares of Pinnacle common stock (which shares will be in
uncertificated book-entry form unless a physical certificate is
requested by such holder) into which the shares of
Mid-America
common stock were converted in the merger. After the effective
date of the merger, each certificate that previously represented
shares of
Mid-America
common stock will only represent the right to receive the shares
of Pinnacle common stock (and cash in lieu of fractions thereof)
into which those shares of
Mid-America
common stock have been converted.
If a certificate for
Mid-America
common stock has been lost, stolen or destroyed, the exchange
agent will issue the consideration properly payable under the
merger agreement upon receipt of appropriate evidence as to that
loss, theft or destruction, appropriate evidence as to the
ownership of that certificate by the claimant, and appropriate
and customary indemnification and bond.
Pinnacle shareholders do not need to exchange their stock
certificates.
No fractional shares of Pinnacle common stock will be issued in
the merger. Instead, the exchange agent will pay each of those
shareholders who would have otherwise been entitled to a
fractional share of Pinnacle common stock an amount in cash
determined by multiplying the fractional share interest by the
average closing price of Pinnacles common stock for the
five trading days preceding the effective date of the merger.
Dividends
and Distributions
Until
Mid-America
common stock certificates are surrendered for exchange, any
dividends or other distributions declared after the effective
time with respect to Pinnacle common stock into which shares of
Mid-America
common stock may have been converted will accrue but will not be
paid. Pinnacle will pay to former
Mid-America
shareholders any unpaid dividends or other distributions without
interest only after they have duly surrendered their
Mid-America
stock certificates. After the effective time of the merger,
there will be no transfers on the stock transfer books of
Mid-America
of any shares of
Mid-America
common stock.
Mid-America
stock at that time will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
If certificates representing shares of
Mid-America
common stock are presented for transfer after the completion of
the merger, they will be cancelled and exchanged for the merger
consideration into which the shares of
Mid-America
common stock represented by that certificate have been
converted. To date, Pinnacle has not paid a dividend and it does
not anticipate that it will begin paying a dividend in the near
future.
The exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from
the merger consideration payable to any
Mid-America
shareholder the amounts it is required to deduct and withhold
under any federal, state, local or foreign tax law. If the
exchange agent withholds any amounts, these amounts will be
treated for all purposes of the merger as having been paid to
the shareholders from whom they were withheld.
The merger will be completed when we file articles of merger
with the Secretary of State of the State of Tennessee. However,
we may agree to a later time for completion of the merger and
specify that time in the articles of merger. While we anticipate
that the merger will be completed during the fourth quarter of
2007 or first quarter of 2008, completion of the merger could be
delayed if there is a delay in obtaining the required
79
regulatory approvals or in satisfying any other conditions to
the merger. There can be no assurances as to whether, or when,
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will obtain the required approvals or complete the merger. If
the merger is not completed on or before March 31, 2008,
either Pinnacle or
Mid-America
may terminate the merger agreement, unless the failure to
complete the merger by that date is due to the failure of the
party seeking to terminate the merger agreement to perform its
covenants and agreements in the merger agreement. See
Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger immediately below.
Conditions
to the Completion of the Merger
Completion of the merger is subject to various conditions. While
it is anticipated that all of these conditions will be
satisfied, there can be no assurance as to whether or when all
of the conditions will be satisfied or, where permissible,
waived.
The respective obligations of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
to complete the merger are subject to the following conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
approval of the merger agreement by
Mid-Americas
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
approval of the merger agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle
common stock in connection with the merger by Pinnacles
shareholders;
|
|
|
|
approval by The Nasdaq Stock Market of listing of the shares of
Pinnacle common stock to be issued in the merger, subject to
official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
receipt of all required regulatory approvals and expiration of
all related statutory waiting periods;
|
|
|
|
effectiveness of the registration statement, of which this joint
proxy statement/prospectus constitutes a part, for the Pinnacle
shares to be issued in the merger;
|
|
|
|
absence of any order, injunction or decree of a court or agency
of competent jurisdiction which prohibits completion of the
merger;
|
|
|
|
the receipt by each party of an opinion of counsel, dated the
closing date of the merger, substantially to the effect that the
merger will be treated as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code and that no tax gain or loss
will be recognized by Pinnacle,
Mid-America
or
Mid-America
shareholders (except for any income tax consequences to
Mid-America
shareholders arising in connection with receipt of the cash
portion of the merger consideration and cash payments for
fractional shares);
|
|
|
|
absence of any statute, rule, regulation, order, injunction or
decree which prohibits, materially restricts or makes illegal
completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of the other partys representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement, except, in the
case of most of the representations and warranties, where the
failure to be accurate would not be reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on the party making the representations
and warranties (see Representations and
Warranties immediately below), and the performance by the
other party of its obligations contained in the merger agreement
in all material respects; and
|
|
|
|
each of
Mid-Americas
executive officers and directors shall have executed agreements
in which they agree to vote their shares of
Mid-America
common stock in favor of the merger.
|
Representations
and Warranties
Each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
has made representations and warranties to the other in the
merger agreement as to:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate existence, good standing and qualification to conduct
business;
|
|
|
|
capital structure;
|
|
|
|
due authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the
merger agreement;
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
absence of any violation of agreements or law or regulation as a
result of the merger;
|
|
|
|
governmental and third party consents necessary to complete the
merger;
|
|
|
|
SEC, banking and other regulatory filings;
|
|
|
|
financial statements;
|
|
|
|
fees payable to financial advisors in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
absence of material adverse changes;
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings and regulatory actions;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
employee matters;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws;
|
|
|
|
contracts;
|
|
|
|
agreements with regulatory agencies;
|
|
|
|
interest rate risk management instruments;
|
|
|
|
undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
|
insurance coverage;
|
|
|
|
environmental matters;
|
|
|
|
state takeover laws;
|
|
|
|
tax treatment as a reorganization;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of information to be included in SEC filings and proxy
statements;
|
|
|
|
disclosure of internal controls and procedures; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of fairness opinions.
|
Most of the representations and warranties of the parties will
be deemed to be true and correct unless the totality of facts,
circumstances or events inconsistent with the representations or
warranties has had or would be reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on (1) the business, results of
operations or financial condition or prospects of the party
making the representations and warranties and its subsidiaries
taken as a whole, or (2) on the ability of the party to
timely complete the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement. In determining whether a material adverse effect has
occurred or is reasonably likely, the parties will disregard any
effects resulting from (A) changes in prevailing interest
rates, currency exchange rates or other economic or monetary
conditions in the United States or elsewhere, (B) changes
in United States or foreign securities markets, including
changes in price levels or trading volumes, (C) changes or
events, after the date hereof, affecting the financial services
industry generally and not specifically relating to Pinnacle or
Mid-America
or their respective subsidiaries, as the case may be,
(D) changes, after the date hereof, in generally accepted
accounting principles or regulatory accounting requirements
applicable to banks or savings associations and their holding
companies generally, (E) changes, after the date hereof, in
laws, rules or regulations of general applicability or
interpretations thereof by any governmental entity,
(F) actions or omissions of Pinnacle or
Mid-America
taken with the prior written consent of the other or required
hereunder, (G) the execution and delivery of the merger
agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated
thereby or the announcement thereof, (H) any outbreak of
major hostilities in which the United States is involved or any
act of terrorism within the United States or directed against
its facilities or citizens wherever located, or (I) any
change in the trading prices of a partys capital stock, by
itself.
81
Conduct
of Business Pending the Merger
Each of the parties has agreed, during the period from the date
of the merger agreement to the completion of the merger, to use
its reasonable best efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in the ordinary course;
|
|
|
|
preserve its business organization, employees, and business
relationships;
|
|
|
|
retain the services of its key officers and key
employees; and
|
|
|
|
take no action to adversely affect or delay obtaining regulatory
approval of the merger, performing the covenants under the
merger agreement, or consummating the merger.
|
In addition, each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
has agreed that it will not, and will not permit any of its
subsidiaries to, subject to limited exceptions set out in the
merger agreement, and without the prior written consent of the
other party,
|
|
|
|
|
(1) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any shares of the
partys capital stock; (2) make, declare or pay any
dividend, or make any other distribution on, or directly or
indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of
the partys capital stock or any securities or obligations
convertible into or exchangeable for any shares of its capital
stock, except (A) dividends paid by or to any of the
subsidiaries of the parties, (B) the acceptance of shares
of the partys common stock as payment of the exercise
price of stock options or for withholding taxes incurred in
connection with the exercise of stock options or the vesting or
lapsing of forfeiture restrictions on restricted shares of
common stock, each in accordance with past practice and the
terms of the applicable award agreements) and (C) the
acceptance of shares of common stock upon forfeiture of any
restricted shares pursuant to any award of restricted shares
under an equity-based incentive plan; (3) grant any stock
appreciation rights or grant any individual, corporation or
other entity any right to acquire any shares of the partys
capital stock; or (4) issue any additional shares of
capital stock except pursuant to the exercise of stock options
outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement or issued
thereafter if permitted;
|
|
|
|
knowingly take any action, or knowingly fail to take any action,
which action or failure to act is reasonably likely to prevent
the merger from qualifying as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
take any action or fail to take any action that is intended or
may reasonably be expected to result in any of the partys
representations and warranties being or becoming untrue in any
material respect, or in any conditions to the merger not being
satisfied;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would materially impede or delay the
ability of the parties to obtain any necessary approvals of any
regulatory agency or governmental entity required for the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; or
|
|
|
|
agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt any
resolutions of its board of directors in support of, any of the
actions prohibited by the preceding bullet points.
|
Mid-America
has also agreed that it will not, without the prior written
consent of Pinnacle or as otherwise previously agreed or
specified in the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice: (1) incur any indebtedness for borrowed
money, or (2) assume, guarantee, endorse or otherwise as an
accommodation become responsible for the obligations of any
other individual, corporation or other entity;
|
|
|
|
increase the wages, salaries, compensation, pension, or other
fringe benefits or perquisites payable to any officer, employee,
or director of
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
pay any pension or retirement allowance not required by any
existing plan or agreement or by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
pay any bonus;
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
become a party to, amend or commit itself to, any pension,
retirement, profit-sharing or welfare benefit plan or agreement
or employment agreement with or for the benefit of any employee,
other than as required by applicable law or an existing
agreement;
|
|
|
|
except as required under any existing plan, grant, or agreement,
accelerate the vesting of, or the lapsing of restrictions with
respect to, any
Mid-America
stock options or restricted shares of
Mid-America
common stock;
|
|
|
|
enter into any material new line of business or make any
material change in its lending, investment, underwriting, risk
and asset liability management or other banking and operating
policies, except as required by applicable law, regulation or
policies imposed by any governmental entity;
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice or as disclosed to
Pinnacle pursuant to the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
amend its charter or bylaws, or otherwise take any action to
exempt any person or entity (other than Pinnacle) or any action
taken by any such person or entity from any takeover statute or
similarly restrictive provisions of its organizational
documents, or terminate, amend or waive any provisions of any
confidentiality or standstill agreements in place with any third
parties;
|
|
|
|
other than in prior consultation with Pinnacle, restructure or
materially change its investment securities portfolio or its gap
position, through purchases, sales or otherwise, or the manner
in which the portfolio is classified or reported; or
|
|
|
|
sell, transfer, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose of any
of its properties or assets that are material to
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any individual,
corporation or other entity other than a subsidiary (or cancel,
release or assign any indebtedness that is material to
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any person or any
claims held by any person that are material to
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in each case other than
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
or pursuant to contracts in force at the date of the merger
agreement or as otherwise consented to between the parties;
|
|
|
|
terminate any of the business protection agreements entered into
with each of Gary Scott, Jason West, Sam Short and David Majors;
|
|
|
|
implement or adopt any change in its tax accounting or financial
accounting principles, practices or methods, other than as
required by applicable law or regulation, generally accepted
accounting principles or regulatory guidelines; and
|
|
|
|
settle any material claim, action or proceeding, except in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice.
|
Pinnacle has agreed that it will not, without the prior written
consent of
Mid-America
or as otherwise previously agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire or agree to acquire any business or any corporation,
partnership, association or other business organization or
division, or acquire any assets which would be material to the
party, other than an acquisition if it would not reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on Pinnacle or
materially delay completion of the merger, or in connection with
foreclosures, settlements in lieu of foreclosures or troubled
loan or debt restructurings in the ordinary course of business
consistent with prudent banking practices; or
|
|
|
|
amend its charter, except to authorize additional common shares,
or bylaws.
|
Reasonable
Best Effort to Obtain Required Shareholder Vote
Each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will take all steps necessary to duly call, give notice of,
convene and hold a meeting of its respective shareholders to be
held as soon as is reasonably practicable after the date on
which the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is part becomes effective for
83
the purpose of voting upon, in the case of
Mid-America
shareholders, the approval of the merger agreement and, in the
case of Pinnacle shareholders, the approval of the merger
agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger. Each of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle will, through its respective board of directors,
use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the approval of its
respective shareholders in respect of the foregoing. Nothing in
the merger agreement is intended to relieve the parties of their
respective obligations to hold a meeting of their shareholders
to obtain the approval required to complete the merger.
No
Solicitation of Alternative Transactions
The merger agreement provides, subject to limited exceptions
described below, that
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries will not authorize its officers, directors
or employees or any investment banker, financial advisor,
attorney, accountant or other representative retained by it or
any of its subsidiaries to (1) solicit, initiate or
encourage (including by way of furnishing information or
assistance), or take any other action designed to facilitate or
encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal that
constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, any acquisition
proposal, (2) participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding any acquisition proposal or (3) make
or authorize any statement, recommendation or solicitation in
support of any acquisition proposal. Furthermore,
Mid-America
is required under the merger agreement to immediately cease any
discussions or negotiations with any other party regarding an
acquisition proposal.
For purposes of the merger agreement, the term acquisition
proposal means any inquiry, proposal or offer, filing of
any regulatory application or notice or disclosure of an
intention to do any of the foregoing from any person relating to
any (1) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a
business that constitutes a substantial portion of the net
revenues, net income or assets of
Mid-America
or any of its significant subsidiaries, (2) direct or
indirect acquisition or purchase of any class of equity
securities representing 10% or more of the voting power of
Mid-America
or any of its significant subsidiaries, (3) tender offer or
exchange offer that if completed would result in any person
beneficially owning 10% or more of the voting power of
Mid-America,
or (4) merger, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries, other than transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement.
The merger agreement permits
Mid-America
to comply with
Rule 14d-9
and
Rule 14e-2
under the Exchange Act with regard to an acquisition proposal
that
Mid-America
may receive. In addition, if
Mid-America
receives an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal,
Mid-America
may engage in discussions and negotiations with or provide
nonpublic information to the person making that acquisition
proposal only if:
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of
Mid-America
receives the acquisition proposal prior to
Mid-Americas
shareholders meeting;
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of
Mid-America,
after consultation with its outside legal counsel, reasonably
determines in good faith that the failure to engage in those
discussions or provide information would cause it to violate its
fiduciary duties under applicable law;
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of
Mid-America
concludes in good faith that the acquisition proposal
constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a superior
proposal (as described below);
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
enters into a confidentiality agreement with the person making
the inquiry or proposal having customary non-disclosure,
confidentiality, standstill and non-solicitation provisions that
are reasonably satisfactory to Pinnacle; and
|
|
|
|
Mid-America
notifies Pinnacle promptly, and in any event within
24 hours of
Mid-Americas
receipt of any acquisition proposal or any request for nonpublic
information relating to
Mid-America
by any third party considering making, or that has made, an
acquisition proposal, of the identity of the third party, the
material terms and conditions of any inquiries, proposals or
offers, and updates on the status of the terms of any proposals,
offers, discussions or negotiations on a current basis.
|
84
For purposes of the merger agreement, the term superior
proposal refers to a bona fide written acquisition
proposal which the board of directors of
Mid-America
concludes in good faith, after consultation with its financial
advisors and legal advisors, taking into account all legal,
financial, regulatory and other aspects of the proposal and the
person making the proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation), (1) is more favorable to the shareholders of
Mid-America
from a financial point of view, than the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement with Pinnacle and
(2) is fully financed or reasonably capable of being fully
financed, reasonably likely to receive all required governmental
approvals on a timely basis and otherwise reasonably capable of
being completed on the terms proposed. For purposes of the
definition of superior proposal, all reference to
10% or more in the definition of acquisition
proposal will be deemed to be a reference to a
majority and acquisition proposal will only be
deemed to refer to a transaction involving
Mid-America.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
General. The merger agreement may be
terminated at any time prior to completion of the merger,
whether before or after the approval of the merger agreement by
Mid-America
shareholders and approval of the merger agreement and the
issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the merger
by Pinnacle shareholders, in any of the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual consent of Pinnacle and
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
by either Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
if any request or application for a required regulatory approval
is denied by the governmental entity which must grant such
approval and such denial has become final and non-appealable, or
a governmental entity has issued an order decree, or ruling to
permanently prohibit the merger and such prohibition has become
final and non-appealable, except that no party may so terminate
the merger agreement if the denial is a result of the failure of
such party to the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
by either Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
if any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction has issued
a final non-appealable order enjoining or otherwise prohibiting
the merger;
|
|
|
|
by either Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
if the merger is not completed on or before March 31, 2008,
unless the failure of the closing to occur by this date is due
to the failure of the party seeking to terminate the merger
agreement to comply with the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
by either Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
if any approval of the shareholders of Pinnacle or
Mid-America
required for completion of the merger has not been obtained upon
a vote taken at a duly held meeting of shareholders or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof;
|
|
|
|
by either Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
if (1) the terminating party is not then in material breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement
contained in the merger agreement and (2) there has been a
breach of any of the covenants, agreements, representations or
warranties of the other party in the merger agreement, which
breach is not cured within 30 days following written notice
to the party committing the breach, or which breach, by its
nature, cannot be cured prior to the closing date of the merger,
and which breach, individually or together with all other
breaches, would, if occurring or continuing on the closing date,
result in the failure of the condition relating to the
performance of obligations or breaches of representations or
warranties described under Conditions to the
Completion of the Merger above;
|
|
|
|
by either Pinnacle or
Mid-America,
if (1) the board of directors of the other does not
publicly recommend that its shareholders either approve the
merger agreement, (2) after recommending that its
shareholders approve the merger agreement, the board of
directors has withdrawn, modified or amended its recommendation
in any manner adverse to the other party, or (3) the other
party materially breaches its obligations under the merger by
reason of a failure to call a meeting of its shareholders or a
failure to prepare and mail to its shareholders this document;
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
by Pinnacle, if the board of directors of
Mid-America
authorizes, recommends, proposes or publicly announces its
intention to authorize, recommend or propose an acquisition
proposal with any person other than Pinnacle; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
by
Mid-America
if Pinnacles average closing stock price over a
ten-day
period prior to and ending on the eighth day before the closing
is less than $18.00 and the quotient resulting from dividing
Pinnacles average closing stock price for that same
ten-day period by the average closing price for Pinnacles
common stock for the
ten-day
period prior to and ending on August 15, 2007 ($25.095) is
less than the difference between (1) the quotient resulting
from dividing the Nasdaq Bank Index on the eighth day prior to
the closing of the merger by the Nasdaq Bank Index on
August 15, 2007 (2,874.37) and (2) 0.25.
|
Effect of Termination. If the merger agreement
is terminated, it will become void and there will be no
liability on the part of Pinnacle or
Mid-America
or their respective officers or directors, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
any termination will be without prejudice to the rights of any
party arising out of the willful breach by the other party of
any provision of the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
designated provisions of the merger agreement, including the
payment of fees and expenses, the confidential treatment of
information and, if applicable, the termination fee described
below, will survive the termination.
|
Termination Fee. The merger agreement provides
that
Mid-America
may be required to pay a termination fee to Pinnacle of
$8 million in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
If Pinnacle terminates the merger agreement because
Mid-Americas
board of directors (1) did not recommend that
Mid-Americas
shareholders approve the merger, (2) after making such a
recommendation, withdraws, modifies or amends its recommendation
in a manner adverse to Pinnacle, or (3) fails to call a
shareholder meeting to approve the merger, then
Mid-America
must pay the termination fee on the business day following the
termination.
|
|
|
|
if Pinnacle terminates the merger agreement because
Mid-Americas
board of directors has authorized, recommended, proposed or
publicly announced its intention to authorize, recommend or
propose any acquisition proposal with any person other than
Pinnacle, then
Mid-America
must pay the termination fee on the business day following the
termination.
|
|
|
|
If (1) the merger agreement is terminated by either party
because the required shareholder vote of
Mid-America
was not obtained at
Mid-Americas
shareholders meeting and (2) a bona fide acquisition
transaction with respect to
Mid-America
was publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the board of
directors of
Mid-America
before its shareholders meeting, which we refer to as a public
proposal, that has not been withdrawn, and within six months
after termination of the merger agreement,
Mid-America
enters into any definitive agreement with respect to, or
consummates, any acquisition transaction, the termination fee
will become payable to Pinnacle on the date the definitive
agreement is executed or the transaction is consummated.
|
|
|
|
If (1) the merger agreement is terminated by either party
because the merger has not been completed by March 31,
2008, or by Pinnacle because of a material breach by
Mid-America
of a representation, warranty, covenant or agreement that causes
a condition to the merger to not be satisfied, (2) a public
proposal with respect to an acquisition transaction involving
Mid-America
was made and not withdrawn before the merger agreement was
terminated and (3) after the announcement of the public
proposal,
Mid-America
intentionally breached any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements and the breach materially contributed to
the failure of the merger to become effective and within six
months after the termination of the merger agreement,
Mid-America
enters into any definitive agreement with respect to, or
consummates, any acquisition transaction, the termination fee
will become payable to Pinnacle on the date the definitive
agreement is executed or the transaction is consummated.
|
86
Acquisition Transaction means:
|
|
|
|
|
the direct or indirect acquisition, purchase or assumption of
all or a substantial portion of the assets or deposits of
Mid-America;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition by any person of direct or indirect beneficial
ownership of 20% or more of the outstanding shares of voting
stock of
Mid-America; or
|
|
|
|
a merger, consolidation, business combination, liquidation,
dissolution or similar transaction involving
Mid-America,
other than a merger, business combination or similar transaction
of
Mid-America
if the shareholders of
Mid-America
immediately before the transaction own at least 60% of the
voting stock of the entity surviving the transaction (or the
parent of the surviving entity) immediately following the
transaction.
|
The purpose of the termination fee is to encourage the
commitment of
Mid-America
to the merger, and to compensate Pinnacle if
Mid-America
engages in certain conduct which would make the merger less
likely to occur. The effect of the termination fee could be to
discourage other companies from seeking to acquire or merge with
Mid-America
prior to completion of the merger, and could cause
Mid-America
to reject any acquisition proposal from a third party which does
not take into account the termination fee.
Extension,
Waiver and Amendment of the Merger Agreement
Extension and Waiver. At any time prior to the
completion of the merger, each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
may, to the extent legally allowed:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party under the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the other partys representations
and warranties contained in the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
waive the other partys compliance with any of its
agreements contained in the merger agreement, or waive
compliance with any conditions to its obligations to complete
the merger.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, after the approval of the merger
agreement by the
Mid-America
and Pinnacle shareholders, there may not be, without their
further approval, any extension or waiver of the merger
agreement that reduces the amount or changes the form of the
consideration to be delivered to the
Mid-America
shareholders.
Amendment. Subject to compliance with
applicable law, Pinnacle and
Mid-America
may amend the merger agreement at any time before or after
approval of the merger agreement by
Mid-America
and Pinnacle shareholders. However, after any approval of the
merger agreement by
Mid-America
and Pinnacle shareholders, there may not be, without their
further approval, any amendment of the merger agreement that
reduces the amount or changes the form of the consideration to
be delivered to the
Mid-America
shareholders.
Employee
Benefit Plans and Existing Agreements
Employee Benefit Plans. The merger agreement
provides that within one year following the effective time of
the merger, to the extent permissible under the terms of the
Pinnacle employee benefit plans, the employees of
Mid-America
and its subsidiaries generally shall be eligible to participate
in Pinnacles employee benefit plans in which similarly
situated employees of Pinnacle or its subsidiaries participate,
to the same extent as similarly situated employees of Pinnacle
or its subsidiaries. For purposes of determining an
employees eligibility to participate in certain plans and
entitlement to benefits thereunder, Pinnacle will give full
credit for the service a continuing employee had with
Mid-America
prior to the merger, except that such service shall not be
recognized to the extent that such recognition would result in a
duplication or increase of benefits. Such service also shall
apply for purposes of satisfying any waiting periods, evidence
of insurability requirements, or the application of any
preexisting condition limitations. Each Pinnacle employee
benefit plan shall waive pre-existing condition limitations to
the same extent waived under the applicable
Mid-America
87
employee benefit plan.
Mid-America
employees shall be given credit for amounts paid under a
corresponding benefit plan during the same period for purposes
of applying deductibles, co-payments and out-of-pocket maximums
as though such amounts had been paid in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Pinnacle employee benefit plans.
Pinnacle is obligated under the merger agreement to honor all
Mid-America
employee benefit plans, employment, severance, change of control
and other compensation agreements and arrangements between
Mid-America
and its employees, and all accrued and vested benefit
obligations existing prior to the execution of the merger
agreement which are between
Mid-America
or any of its subsidiaries and any current or former director,
officer, employee or consultant of
Mid-America.
From and after the effective date of the merger, Pinnacle will,
and will cause any applicable subsidiary thereof or employee
benefit plan, to provide or pay when due to
Mid-Americas
employees as of the effective date of the merger all benefits
and compensation pursuant to
Mid-Americas
employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements in effect on
the date of the merger agreement earned or accrued through, and
to which such individuals are entitled as of the effective date
of the merger (or such later time as such employee benefit plans
as in effect at the effective date of the merger are terminated
or canceled by Pinnacle) subject to compliance with the terms of
the merger agreement.
Stock
Exchange Listing; Deregistration of
Mid-America
Common Stock
Pinnacle common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market. Pinnacle has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts
to cause the shares of Pinnacle common stock to be issued in the
merger to be quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market. It is a
condition to completion of the merger that those shares be
quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, subject to official
notice of issuance. If the merger is completed,
Mid-America
common stock will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
The merger agreement provides that each of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will pay its own expenses in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, except that Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will share equally the costs and expenses of printing and
mailing this joint proxy statement/prospectus to the
shareholders of
Mid-America
and Pinnacle, and all filing and other fees paid to the SEC in
connection with the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement.
88
DESCRIPTION
OF PINNACLE CAPITAL STOCK
General
The authorized capital stock of Pinnacle consists of
90 million shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per
share, and 10 million shares of preferred stock, no par
value. As of the record date, 15,553,037 shares of Pinnacle
common stock were outstanding, and no shares of Pinnacle
preferred stock were outstanding. The preferred stock may be
issued in one or more series with those terms and at those times
and for any consideration as the Pinnacle board of directors
determines. As of the date hereof, 7,166,631 shares of
Pinnacle common stock were reserved for issuance to
Mid-America
shareholders in accordance with the merger agreement and
2,161,148 shares of Pinnacle common stock were reserved for
issuance upon the exercise of outstanding stock options under
various employee stock option plans.
The following summary of the terms of the capital stock of
Pinnacle is not intended to be complete and is subject in all
respects to the applicable provisions of the TBCA, and is
qualified by reference to the charter and bylaws of Pinnacle. To
obtain copies of these documents, see WHERE YOU CAN FIND
MORE INFORMATION beginning on page 133.
Common
Stock
The outstanding shares of Pinnacle common stock are fully paid
and nonassessable. Holders of Pinnacle common stock are entitled
to one vote for each share held of record on all matters
submitted to a vote of the shareholders. Holders of Pinnacle
common stock do not have pre-emptive rights and are not entitled
to cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of
directors. The Pinnacle common stock is neither redeemable nor
convertible into other securities, and there are no sinking fund
provisions.
Subject to the preferences applicable to any shares of Pinnacle
preferred stock outstanding at the time, holders of Pinnacle
common stock are entitled to dividends when and as declared by
the Pinnacle board of directors from legally available funds and
are entitled, in the event of liquidation, to share ratably in
all assets remaining after payment of liabilities.
Preferred
Stock
No shares of preferred stock are outstanding. The board of
directors of Pinnacle may, without further action by the
shareholders of Pinnacle, issue one or more series of Pinnacle
preferred stock and fix the rights and preferences of those
shares, including the dividend rights, dividend rates,
conversion rights, exchange rights, voting rights, terms of
redemption, redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences,
the number of shares constituting any series and the designation
of such series.
Election
of Directors by Shareholders
Pinnacles charter and bylaws provide that the Pinnacle
board of directors is to be divided into three classes as nearly
equal in number as possible. Directors are elected by classes to
three-year terms, so that approximately one-third of the
directors of Pinnacle are elected at each annual meeting of the
shareholders. In addition, Pinnacles bylaws provide that
the power to increase or decrease the number of directors and to
fill vacancies is vested in the Pinnacle board of directors. The
overall effect of these provisions may be to prevent a person or
entity from seeking to acquire control of Pinnacle through an
increase in the number of directors on the Pinnacle board of
directors and the election of designated nominees to fill newly
created vacancies.
Corporate
Transactions
Pinnacles charter provides that all extraordinary
corporate transactions must be approved by two-thirds of the
directors and a majority of the shares entitled to vote or a
majority of the directors and two-thirds of the shares entitled
to vote.
89
Anti-Takeover
Statutes
The Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act generally provides
that, except as stated below, control shares will
not have any voting rights. Control shares are shares acquired
by a person under certain circumstances which, when added to
other shares owned, would give such person effective control
over one-fifth or more, or a majority of all voting power (to
the extent such acquired shares cause such a person to exceed
one-fifth or one-third of all voting power) in the election of a
Tennessee corporations directors. However, voting rights
will be restored to control shares by resolution approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
corporations voting stock, other than shares held by the
owner of the control shares. If voting rights are granted to
control shares which give the holder a majority of all voting
power in the election of the corporations directors, then
the corporations other shareholders may require the
corporation to redeem their shares at fair value.
The Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act is not applicable to
Pinnacle because the Pinnacle charter does not contain a
specific provision opting in to the act.
The Tennessee Investor Protection Act, or TIPA, provides that
unless a Tennessee corporations board of directors has
recommended a takeover offer to shareholders, no offeror
beneficially owning 5% or more of any class of equity securities
of the offeree company, any of which was purchased within the
preceding year, may make a takeover offer for any class of
equity security of the offeree company if after completion the
offeror would be a beneficial owner of more than 10% of any
class of outstanding equity securities of the company unless the
offeror, before making such purchase: (1) makes a public
announcement of his or her intention with respect to changing or
influencing the management or control of the offeree company;
(2) makes a full, fair and effective disclosure of such
intention to the person from whom he or she intends to acquire
such securities; and (3) files with the Tennessee
Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance (the
Commissioner) and the offeree company a statement
signifying such intentions and containing such additional
information as may be prescribed by the Commissioner.
The offeror must provide that any equity securities of an
offeree company deposited or tendered pursuant to a takeover
offer may be withdrawn by an offeree at any time within seven
days from the date the offer has become effective following
filing with the Commissioner and the offeree company and public
announcement of the terms or after 60 days from the date
the offer has become effective. If the takeover offer is for
less than all the outstanding equity securities of any class,
such an offer must also provide for acceptance of securities pro
rata if the number of securities tendered is greater than the
number the offeror has offered to accept and pay for. If such an
offeror varies the terms of the takeover offer before its
expiration date by increasing the consideration offered to
offerees, the offeror must pay the increased consideration for
all equity securities accepted, whether accepted before or after
the variation in the terms of the offer.
The TIPA does not apply to Pinnacle, as it does not apply to
bank holding companies subject to regulation by a federal agency
and does not apply to any offer involving a vote by holders of
equity securities of the offeree company.
The Tennessee Business Combination Act generally prohibits a
business combination by Pinnacle or a subsidiary
with an interested shareholder within five years
after the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder.
Pinnacle or a subsidiary can, however, enter into a business
combination within that period if, before the interested
shareholder became such, Pinnacles board of directors
approved the business combination or the transaction in which
the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder.
After that five-year moratorium, the business combination with
the interested shareholder can be consummated only if it
satisfies certain fair price criteria or is approved by
two-thirds (2/3) of the other shareholders.
For purposes of the Tennessee Business Combination Act, a
business combination includes mergers, share
exchanges, sales and leases of assets, issuances of securities,
and similar transactions. An interested shareholder
is generally any person or entity that beneficially owns 10% or
more of the voting power of any outstanding class or series of
Pinnacle stock.
90
Pinnacles charter does not have special requirements for
transactions with interested parties; however, all business
combinations, as defined above, must be approved by two thirds
(2/3) of the directors and a majority of the shares entitled to
vote or a majority of the directors and two thirds (2/3) of the
shares entitled to vote.
The Tennessee Greenmail Act applies to a Tennessee Corporation
that has a class of voting stock registered or traded on a
national securities exchange or registered with the SEC pursuant
to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Under the Tennessee
Greenmail Act, Pinnacle may not purchase any of its shares at a
price above the market value of such shares from any person who
holds more than 3% of the class of securities to be purchased if
such person has held such shares for less than two years, unless
the purchase has been approved by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of each class of voting stock
issued by Pinnacle or Pinnacle makes an offer, or at least equal
value per share, to all shareholders of such class.
The TBCA provides that a corporation may indemnify any of its
directors and officers against liability incurred in connection
with a proceeding if: (a) such person acted in good faith;
(b) in the case of conduct in an official capacity with the
corporation, he reasonably believed such conduct was in the
corporations best interests; (c) in all other cases,
he reasonably believed that his conduct was at least not opposed
to the best interests of the corporation; and (d) in
connection with any criminal proceeding, such person had no
reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In actions
brought by or in the right of the corporation, however, the TBCA
provides that no indemnification may be made if the director or
officer was adjudged to be liable to the corporation. The TBCA
also provides that in connection with any proceeding charging
improper personal benefit to an officer or director, no
indemnification may be made if such officer or director is
adjudged liable on the basis that such personal benefit was
improperly received. In cases where the director or officer is
wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of
any proceeding instigated because of his or her status as a
director or officer of a corporation, the TBCA mandates that the
corporation indemnify the director or officer against reasonable
expenses incurred in the proceeding. The TBCA provides that a
court of competent jurisdiction, unless the corporations
charter provides otherwise, upon application, may order that an
officer or director be indemnified for reasonable expenses if,
in consideration of all relevant circumstances, the court
determines that such individual is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnification, notwithstanding the fact that
(a) such officer or director was adjudged liable to the
corporation in a proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation; (b) such officer or director was adjudged
liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly
received by him; or (c) such officer or director breached
his duty of care to the corporation.
Pinnacles charter provides that Pinnacle will indemnify
its directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted by
the TBCA. Pinnacles bylaws provide that its directors and
officers shall be indemnified against expenses that they
actually and reasonably incur if they are successful on the
merits of a claim or proceeding. In addition, the bylaws provide
that Pinnacle will advance to its directors and officers
reasonable expenses of any claim or proceeding so long as the
director or officer furnishes Pinnacle with (1) a written
affirmation of his or her good faith belief that he or she has
met the applicable standard of conduct and (2) a written
statement that he or she will repay any advances if it is
ultimately determined that he or she is not entitled to
indemnification.
When a case or dispute is settled or otherwise not ultimately
determined on its merits, the indemnification provisions provide
that Pinnacle will indemnify its directors and officers when
they meet the applicable standard of conduct. The applicable
standard of conduct is met if the directors or officer acted in
a manner he or she in good faith believed to be in or not
opposed to Pinnacles best interests and, in the case of a
criminal action or proceeding, if the insider had no reasonable
cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
Pinnacles board of directors, shareholders or independent
legal counsel determines whether the director or officer has met
the applicable standard of conduct in each specific case.
Pinnacles charter and bylaws also provide that the
indemnification rights contained therein do not exclude other
indemnification rights to which a director or officer may be
entitled under any bylaw, resolution or agreement, either
specifically or in general terms approved by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to
vote. Pinnacle can also provide for greater indemnification than
is provided
91
for in the bylaws if Pinnacle chooses to do so, subject to
approval by its shareholders and the limitations provided in
Pinnacles charter as discussed in the subsequent paragraph.
Pinnacles charter eliminates, with exceptions, the
potential personal liability of a director for monetary damages
to Pinnacle and its shareholders for breach of a duty as a
director. There is, however, no elimination of liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
a breach of the directors duty of loyalty to Pinnacle or
its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
an act or omission not in good faith or which involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; or
|
|
|
|
any payment of a dividend or approval of a stock repurchase that
is illegal under the Tennessee Business Corporation Act.
|
Pinnacles charter does not eliminate or limit
Pinnacles right or the right of its shareholders to seek
injunctive or other equitable relief not involving monetary
damages.
The indemnification provisions of the bylaws specifically
provide that Pinnacle may purchase and maintain insurance on
behalf of any director or officer against any liability asserted
against and incurred by him or her in his or her capacity as a
director, officer, employee or agent whether or not Pinnacle
would have had the power to indemnify against such liability.
92
COMPARISON
OF THE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
Both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
are incorporated under the laws of the State of Tennessee. The
holders of shares of
Mid-America
common stock, whose rights as shareholders are currently
governed by Tennessee law, the charter of
Mid-America
and the bylaws of
Mid-America,
will, upon the exchange of their shares of
Mid-America
common stock for shares of Pinnacle common stock at the
effective time pursuant to the merger, become holders of
Pinnacle common stock and their rights as such will be governed
by Tennessee law, the Pinnacle charter and the Pinnacle bylaws.
The material differences between the rights of holders of shares
of
Mid-America
common stock and Pinnacle common stock, which result from
differences in their governing corporate documents, are
summarized below.
The following summary is not intended to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the TBCA, the Pinnacle
charter, the Pinnacle bylaws, the
Mid-America
charter and the
Mid-America
bylaws, as appropriate. The identification of specific
differences is not meant to indicate that other equally or more
significant differences do not exist. Copies of the Pinnacle
charter, the Pinnacle bylaws, the
Mid-America
charter and the
Mid-America
bylaws are available upon request. To obtain copies of these
documents, see WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
beginning on page 133.
Summary
of Material Differences Between the
Rights of Pinnacle Shareholders and the Rights of
Mid-America
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
Description of Common Stock:
|
|
Pinnacle is authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $1.00 per share.
|
|
Mid-America is authorized to issue 75,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $1.00 (unless otherwise specified by the
board of directors).
|
Description of Preferred Stock:
|
|
Pinnacles charter authorizes the board of directors to
issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with no par
value.
|
|
Mid-Americas charter authorizes the board of directors to
issue 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00
(unless otherwise specified by the board of directors).
|
Special Meeting of Shareholders:
|
|
Under the TBCA, the board of directors, any person authorized by
the charter or bylaws, or (unless the charter provides
otherwise) the holders of at least 10% of the votes entitled to
be cast may call a special meeting of shareholders.
|
|
Under the TBCA, the board of directors, any person authorized by
the charter or bylaws, or (unless the charter provides
otherwise) the holders of at least 10% of the votes entitled to
be cast may call a special meeting of shareholders.
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
Pinnacles bylaws allow for special meetings of the
shareholders to be called at any time by its board of directors,
its president, or by the holders of at least 25% of votes
entitled to be cast at any special meeting, upon the delivery of
a written request to its secretary. The request must describe
the purpose(s) for the meeting. Special meetings shall be held
at those times, places and dates as shall be specified in the
notice of the meeting.
|
|
Special meetings of Mid-Americas shareholders may be
called by the chairman of the board of directors, the president,
the chief executive officer or any two executive vice presidents
or by the affirmative vote of not less than 75% of the board of
directors acting with or without a meeting. Special meetings of
shareholders may also be called by the holders of at least 75%
of all votes entitled to be cast on any issue proposed to be
considered at any specially-called meeting upon request in
writing to the secretary of Mid-America, at least 90 days
before the date of the meeting.
|
Shareholder Rights Plan:
|
|
Pinnacle does not have a shareholder rights plan as a part of
its charter, bylaws, or by separate agreement.
|
|
Same as Pinnacle.
|
Election and Size of Board of Directors:
|
|
The board of directors must not consist of less than five (5)
nor more than twenty-five (25) members. The number may be fixed
or changed from time to time, by the affirmative vote of
two-thirds of the issued and outstanding shares of the
corporation entitled to vote in an election of directors, or by
the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all directors then in
office.
|
|
The number of directors of the Mid-America must not be fewer
than three (3) nor more than thirty (30). No action may be
taken to decrease or increase the number of directors unless a
majority of the directors then in office concurs in that action.
|
|
|
The board of directors is divided into three (3) classes,
Class I, Class II and Class III, which are nearly
equal in number as possible. Each Class of director serves a
three (3) year term. No person over the age of seventy (70) is
eligible for election.
|
|
The board of directors of Mid-America is divided into three
classes as nearly equal in number as possible. The classes are
designated Class I, Class II and Class III with
each director elected for a term of three (3) years.
|
|
|
Presently, Pinnacles board of directors consists of 13
members. After the merger, Pinnacles board of directors
will have at least 16 members.
|
|
Presently, Mid-Americas board of directors consists of 14
members.
|
Vacancies on the Board of Directors:
|
|
The TBCA provides that vacancies on the board of directors may
be filled by the shareholders or directors, unless the charter
provides otherwise.
|
|
The TBCA provides that vacancies on the board of directors may
be filled by the shareholders or directors, unless the charter
provides otherwise.
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
Pinnacles bylaws provide that the directors, even though
less than a quorum, may fill any vacancy on the board of
directors, including a vacancy created by an increase in the
number of directors. Any appointment by the directors shall
continue until the expiration of the term of the director whose
place has become vacant, or, in the case of an increase in the
number of director, until the next meeting of the shareholders.
|
|
Mid-Americas bylaws provide that vacancies in the board of
directors, however caused, and newly created directorships are
filled by the affirmative vote of the majority of the total
number of directors then in office, though less than a quorum,
or by a sole remaining directors. Any director elected to fill a
vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors
shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the
remaining term of the class of directors to which he or she is
elected.
|
Removal of Directors:
|
|
The TBCA provides that shareholders may remove directors with or
without cause unless the charter provides that directors may be
removed only for cause. However, if a director is elected by a
particular voting group, that director may only be removed by
the requisite vote of that voting group.
|
|
The TBCA provides that shareholders may remove directors with or
without cause unless the charter provides that directors may be
removed only for cause. However, if a director is elected by a
particular voting group, that director may only be removed by
the requisite vote of that voting group.
|
|
|
Pinnacles charter or bylaws provide that a director may be
removed with cause by a majority of the shares entitled to vote
or upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of all
directors then in office or without cause by a vote of
two-thirds (2/3) of the shares entitled to vote.
|
|
Mid-Americas charter provides that any one or more
directors may be removed for cause, at any time, by the
affirmative vote of at least 75% of the entire board of
directors or by the affirmative vote of at least 75% of all
issued and outstanding shares of Mid-America.
|
Indemnification:
|
|
The Pinnacle charter and bylaws provide that Pinnacle shall have
the power to indemnify any director or officer of the
corporation to the fullest extent permitted by the TBCA, as
amended. Pinnacle may also indemnify and advance expenses to any
employee or agent of Pinnacle who is not a director or officer
to the same extent as to a director or officer if the board of
directors determines that to do so is in the best interests of
Pinnacle.
|
|
Same as Pinnacle.
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
Personal Liability of Directors:
|
|
Pinnacles charter provides that, to the fullest extent
permitted by the TBCA, a director of Pinnacle shall not be
liable to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director.
|
|
Same as Pinnacle.
|
|
|
The TBCA provides that a corporation may not indemnify a
director for liability 1) for any breach of the directors
duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders; 2) for
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law; or 3) under Sec.
48-18-304 of the TBCA (with respect to the unlawful payment of
dividends), as the same exists or hereafter may be amended.
|
|
|
|
|
Under Pinnacles charter, any modification to this
provision requires an affirmative vote of either two-thirds
(2/3) of the directors in office or two-thirds (2/3) of the
shares entitled to vote. All modifications to this provision are
prospective.
|
|
Under Mid-Americas charter, any modification to this
provision requires the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% or
more of the shares entitled to vote; provided, however, that if
at least 75% of the members of the entire board of directors
adopt a resolution affirmatively recommending the proposed
amendment and directing that it be submitted to the
shareholders, then the amendment shall be adopted if approved by
a majority of the shares entitled to vote.
|
Dissenters Rights:
|
|
The TBCA provides that a shareholder of a corporation is
generally entitled to receive payment of the fair value of his
or her stock if the shareholder dissents from transactions
including a proposed merger, share exchange or a sale of
substantially all of the assets of the corporation. However,
dissenters rights generally are not available to holders
of shares, such as shares of Pinnacle common stock, which are
registered on a national securities exchange or quoted on a
national market security system.
|
|
Under the TBCA, Mid-Americas shareholders have
dissenters rights which entitle them to dissent from, and
obtain payment of the fair value of the shareholders
shares in the event of, certain extraordinary corporate
transactions.
Mid-Americas shareholders have the right to dissent from
this merger.
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
Votes on Extraordinary Corporate Transactions:
|
|
Under the TBCA, a sale or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the corporations assets, a merger of
the corporation with and into another corporation, or a share
exchange involving one or more classes or series of the
corporations shares or a dissolution of the corporation
must be approved by the board of directors (except in certain
limited circumstances) plus, with certain exceptions, the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all shares of
stock entitled to vote thereon.
|
|
Under the TBCA, a sale or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the corporations assets, a merger of
the corporation with and into another corporation, or a share
exchange involving one or more classes or series of the
corporations shares or a dissolution of the corporation
must be approved by the board of directors (except in certain
limited circumstances) plus, with certain exceptions, the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all shares of
stock entitled to vote thereon.
|
|
|
Pinnacles charter requires that all extraordinary
corporate transactions must be approved by two thirds (2/3) of
the directors and a majority of the shares entitled to vote or a
majority of the directors and two thirds (2/3) of the shares
entitled to vote.
|
|
Mid-Americas charter provides that all extraordinary
corporate transactions must be approved by the affirmative vote
of the holders of 75% or more of the shares entitled to vote;
provided, however, that if at least 75% of the members of the
entire board of directors adopt a resolution affirmatively
recommending the proposed transaction and directing that it be
submitted to the shareholders for their approval, then such
transactions shall be adopted if approved by a majority of the
shares entitled to vote. Because Mid-Americas board of
directors unanimously approved the merger with Pinnacle, the
affirmative vote of the shares entitled to vote will be
necessary to approve the merger.
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
Consideration of Other Constituencies:
|
|
The TBCA provides that no corporation (nor its officers or
directors) registered or traded on a national securities
exchange or registered with the SEC shall be held liable for
either having failed to approve the acquisition of shares by an
interested shareholder on or before such interested
shareholders share acquisition date, or for opposing any
proposed merger, exchange, tender offer or significant
disposition of the assets of the corporation or any of its
subsidiaries because of a good faith belief that such merger,
exchange, tender offer or significant disposition of assets
would adversely affect the corporations employees,
customers, suppliers, the communities in which such corporation
or its subsidiaries operate or are located or any other relevant
factor if such factors are permitted to be considered by the
board of directors under the charter for such corporation in
connection with a merger, exchange, tender offer or significant
disposition of assets. Pinnacles charter permits such
factors to be considered.
|
|
Same as Pinnacle.
|
Amendment of Charter:
|
|
The TBCA provides that certain relatively technical amendments
to a corporations charter may be adopted by the directors
without shareholder action. Generally, the TBCA provides that a
corporations charter may be amended by a majority of votes
entitled to be cast on an amendment, subject to any condition
the board of directors may place on its submission of the
amendment to the shareholders.
|
|
The TBCA provides that certain relatively technical amendments
to a corporations charter may be adopted by the directors
without shareholder action. Generally, the TBCA provides that a
corporations charter may be amended by a majority of votes
entitled to be cast on an amendment, subject to any condition
the board of directors may place on its submission of the
amendment to the shareholders.
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
Pinnacles charter contains no other specific provisions.
|
|
In addition to the requirements of the TBCA, the provisions set
forth in Articles VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, and XV
of Mid-Americas charter may only be modified by an
affirmative vote the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% or
more of the shares entitled to vote; provided, however, that if
at least 75% of the members of the entire board of directors
adopt a resolution affirmatively recommending the amendment and
directing that it be submitted to the shareholders for their
approval, then the amendment shall be adopted if approved by a
majority of the shares entitled to vote.
|
Amendment of Bylaws:
|
|
Under the TBCA, shareholder action is generally not necessary to
amend the bylaws, unless the charter provides otherwise or the
shareholders in amending or repealing a particular bylaw provide
expressly that the board of directors may not amend or repeal
that bylaw. The shareholders may amend or repeal Pinnacles
bylaws even though the bylaws may also be amended or repealed by
its board of directors.
|
|
Under the TBCA, shareholder action is generally not necessary to
amend the bylaws, unless the charter provides otherwise or the
shareholders in amending or repealing a particular bylaw provide
expressly that the board of directors may not amend or repeal
that bylaw. The shareholders may amend or repeal
Mid-Americas bylaws even though the bylaws may also be
amended or repealed by its board of directors.
|
|
|
Pinnacles bylaws may be altered or amended and new bylaws
may be adopted by the shareholders at any annual or special
meeting of the shareholders or by the board of directors at any
regular or special meeting of the board of directors. If this
action is to be taken at a meeting of the shareholders, notice
of the general nature of the proposed change in the bylaws must
be given in the notice of meeting. The shareholders may provide
by resolution that any bylaw provision modified by them may not
be modified by the board.
|
|
Mid-Americas bylaws may be amended or repealed or
additional bylaws may be adopted by the board of directors by a
vote of a majority of the entire board of directors; provided,
however, that any amendment or repeal of any part of Article 1,
2, 5, 6, 7, or 9 of the bylaws effected by the board of
directors shall require the affirmative vote of at least 75% of
the full board of directors following 20 days prior written
notice, or, if presented to shareholders shall require the
affirmative vote of at least 75% of all of the shares entitled
to vote thereon, exclusive of any interested shareholder
following at least 45 days prior written notice to all
shareholders of the specific proposal.
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
Except as otherwise provided in the charter, action by the
shareholders with respect to bylaws shall be taken by an
affirmative vote of a majority of all shares entitled to elect
directors, and action by the board of directors with respect to
bylaws shall be taken by an affirmative vote of a majority of
all directors then holding office.
|
|
|
Control Share Acquisitions:
|
|
The Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act generally provides that, except as stated below, control shares will not have any voting rights. Control shares are shares acquired by a person under certain circumstances which, when added to other shares owned, would give such person effective control over one-fifth or more, or a majority of all voting power (to the extent such acquired
shares cause such person to exceed one-fifth or one-third of all voting power) in the election of a Tennessee corporations directors. However, voting rights will be restored to control shares by resolution approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the corporations voting stock, other than shares held by the owner of the control shares. If voting rights are granted
to control shares which give the holder a majority of all voting power in the election of the corporations directors, then the corporations other shareholders may require the corporation to redeem their shares at fair value. The Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act is not applicable to Pinnacle because the Pinnacle charter does not contain a specific provision opting in
to the Control Share Acquisition Act.
|
|
The Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act generally provides that, except as stated below, control shares will not have any voting rights. Control shares are shares acquired by a person under certain circumstances which, when added to other shares owned, would give such person effective control over one-fifth or more, or a majority of all voting power (to the extent such acquired
shares cause such person to exceed one-fifth or one-third of all voting power) in the election of a Tennessee corporations directors. However, voting rights will be restored to control shares by resolution approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the corporations voting stock, other than shares held by the owner of the control shares. If voting rights are granted
to control shares which give the holder a majority of all voting power in the election of the corporations directors, then the corporations other shareholders may require the corporation to redeem their shares at fair value. The Tennessee Control Share Acquisition Act is applicable to Mid-America because Mid-Americas charter specifically opts in to the Control Share
Acquisition Act.
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
Investor Protection Act:
|
|
The Tennessee Investor Protection Act (TIPA)
provides that unless a Tennessee corporations board of
directors has recommended a takeover offer to shareholders, no
offeror beneficially owning 5% or more of any class of equity
securities of the offeree company, any of which was purchased
within the preceding year, may make a takeover offer for any
class of equity security of the offeree company if after
completion the offeror would be a beneficial owner of more than
10% of any class of outstanding equity securities of the company
unless the offeror, before making such purchase: (i) makes a
public announcement of his or her intention with respect to
changing or influencing the management or control of the offeree
company; (ii) makes a full, fair and effective disclosure of
such intention to the person from whom he or she intends to
acquire such securities; and (iii) files with the Tennessee
Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance (the
Commissioner) and the offeree company a statement
signifying such intentions and containing such additional
information as may be prescribed by the Commissioner.
|
|
Same as Pinnacle.
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
The offeror must provide that any equity securities of an
offeree company deposited or tendered pursuant to a takeover
offer may be withdrawn by an offeree at any time within seven
days from the date the offer has become effective following
filing with the Commissioner and the offeree company and public
announcement of the terms or after 60 days from the date
the offer has become effective. If the takeover offer is for
less than all the outstanding equity securities of any class,
such an offer must also provide for acceptance of securities pro
rata if the number of securities tendered is greater than the
number the offeror has offered to accept and pay for. If such an
offeror varies the terms of the takeover offer before its
expiration date by increasing the consideration offered to
offerees, the offeror must pay the increased consideration for
all equity securities accepted, whether accepted before or after
the variation in the terms of the offer.
|
|
|
|
|
The TIPA does not apply to Pinnacle, as it does not apply to
bank holding companies subject to regulation by a federal agency
and does not apply to any offer involving a vote by holders of
equity securities of the offeree company.
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
Business Combinations Involving Interested Shareholders:
|
|
The Tennessee Business Combination Act generally prohibits a
business combination by Pinnacle or a subsidiary
with an interested shareholder within five years
after the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder.
Pinnacle or a subsidiary can, however, enter into a business
combination within that period if, before the interested
shareholder became such, Pinnacles board of directors
approved the business combination or the transaction in which
the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder.
After that five-year moratorium, the business combination with
the interested shareholder can be consummated only if it
satisfies certain fair price criteria or is approved by
two-thirds (2/3) of the other shareholders.
|
|
The Tennessee Business Combination Act generally prohibits a
business combination by Mid-America or a subsidiary
with an interested shareholder within five years
after the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder.
Mid-America or a subsidiary can, however, enter into a business
combination within that period if, before the interested
shareholder became such, Mid-Americas board of directors
approved the business combination or the transaction in which
the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder.
After that five-year moratorium, the business combination with
the interested shareholder can be consummated only if it
satisfies certain fair price criteria or is approved by
two-thirds (2/3) of the other shareholders.
|
|
|
For purposes of the Tennessee Business Combination Act, a
business combination includes mergers, share
exchanges, sales and leases of assets, issuances of securities,
and similar transactions. An interested shareholder
is generally any person or entity that beneficially owns 10% or
more of the voting power of any outstanding class or series of
Pinnacle stock.
|
|
For purposes of the Tennessee Business Combination Act, a
business combination includes mergers, share
exchanges, sales and leases of assets, issuances of securities,
and similar transactions. An interested shareholder
is generally any person or entity that beneficially owns 10% or
more of the voting power of any outstanding class or series of
Mid-America stock.
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle Shareholder Rights
|
|
Mid-America Shareholder Rights
|
|
|
|
Pinnacles charter does not have special requirements for
transactions with interested parties; however, all business
combinations, as defined above, must be approved by two thirds
(2/3) of the directors and a majority of the shares entitled to
vote or a majority of the directors and two thirds (2/3) of the
shares entitled to vote.
|
|
Mid-Americas charter also provides that for purposes of
calling a special meeting of shareholders, shares held by any
interested shareholder shall be disregarded for purposes of
determining whether the requisite percentage to call the meeting
has been reached. Additionally, all business combinations, as
defined above, must be approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of 75% or more of the shares entitled to vote; provided,
however, that if at least 75% of the members of the entire board
of directors adopt a resolution affirmatively recommending the
proposed transaction and directing that it be submitted to the
shareholders for their approval, then such amendment shall be
adopted if approved by a majority of the shares entitled to
vote. Because Mid-Americas board of directors unanimously
approved the merger with Pinnacle, the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares entitled to vote will be necessary to
approve the merger.
|
Greenmail Act
|
|
The Tennessee Greenmail Act applies to a Tennessee corporation
that has a class of voting stock registered or traded on a
national securities exchange or registered with the SEC pursuant
to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Under the Tennessee
Greenmail Act, Pinnacle may not purchase any of its shares at a
price above the market value of such shares from any person who
holds more than 3% of the class of securities to be purchased if
such person has held such shares for less than two years, unless
the purchase has been approved by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of each class of voting stock
issued by Pinnacle or Pinnacle makes an offer, of at least equal
value per share, to all shareholders of such class.
|
|
Same as Pinnacle.
|
104
ABOUT
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
Pinnacle, a bank holding company under the laws of the United
States, is a Tennessee corporation that was incorporated on
February 28, 2000 to organize and serve as the holding
company for Pinnacle National Bank, a national bank chartered
under the laws of the United States. Pinnacle National Bank
commenced its banking operations on October 27, 2000 and
operates 19 offices as a community bank in urban markets
emphasizing personalized banking relationships with individuals
and businesses. Pinnacle owns 100% of the capital stock of
Pinnacle National Bank.
Pinnacle National Banks primary service area, which
comprises the Nashville MSA, includes Davidson County and twelve
surrounding counties; in particular, market efforts are
concentrated in Davidson, Williamson, Sumner and Rutherford
counties, which represent 77% of the Nashville MSAs
population base and 85% of the deposit base (based on
June 30, 2006 FDIC information). This MSA represents a
geographic area that covers approximately 4,000 square
miles and an estimated population in excess of 1.6 million
people based on U.S. Census Bureau estimates for 2006.
Pinnacle National Bank also opened an office in Knoxville,
Tennessee in April 2007, and Pinnacle expects that it will have
five offices in the Knoxville MSA within the next three years.
The Knoxville MSA, in east Tennessee, has an estimated
population of approximately 670,000 based on U.S. Census
Bureau estimates for 2006.
Pinnacle National Bank has established a broad base of core
deposits, including savings, checking, interest-bearing
checking, money market and certificate of deposit accounts.
Pinnacle National Banks deposits are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to the maximum extent
provided by law. Pinnacle National Bank also offers a broad
array of convenience-centered products and services, including
24 hour telephone and Internet banking, debit cards, direct
deposit and cash management services for small to medium-sized
businesses. Additionally, Pinnacle National Bank is associated
with a nationwide network of automated teller machines of other
financial institutions that may be used throughout Tennessee and
other regions.
Pinnacle National Bank offers a full range of lending products,
including commercial, real estate and consumer loans to
individuals and small-to medium-sized businesses and
professional entities.
Pinnacle National Bank also contracts with Raymond James
Financial Service, Inc., a registered broker-dealer and
investment adviser, to offer and sell various securities and
other financial products to the public from Pinnacle National
Banks locations through Pinnacle National Bank employees
who also are Raymond James employees. Pinnacle National
Banks suite of investment products offered through Raymond
James from Pinnacle National Banks offices include:
|
|
|
Mutual
Funds
|
|
Fixed
Annuities
|
Variable
Annuities
|
|
Stocks
|
Money
Market Instruments
|
|
Financial
Planning
|
Treasury
Securities
|
|
Asset
Management Accounts
|
Bonds
|
|
Listed
Options
|
Other affiliate companies of Pinnacle include PFP
Title Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle
National Bank. PFP Title Company sells title insurance
policies to Pinnacle National Bank customers and others. PNFP
Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PFP
Title Company and is the parent of PNFP Properties, Inc.,
which was established as a Real Estate Investment Trust pursuant
to Internal Revenue Service regulations. Pinnacle Community
Development, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle
National Bank and is certified as a Community Development Entity
by the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund of the
United States Department of the Treasury. The primary mission of
Pinnacle Community Development, Inc., is serving, or providing
investment capital for, low-income communities or low-income
persons. PNFP Statutory Trust I, PNFP Statutory
Trust II and PNFP Statutory Trust III, wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Pinnacle, were created for the exclusive purpose
of issuing capital trust preferred securities. Pinnacle Advisory
Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle, was
established as a registered investment advisor pursuant to
regulations promulgated by the FRB. Pinnacle Credit Enhancement
Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle, was
established as a holding company to own a 24.5%
105
membership interest in Collateral Plus, LLC. Collateral Plus,
LLC serves as an intermediary between investors and borrowers in
certain financial transactions whereby the borrowers require
enhanced collateral in the form of letters of credit issued by
the investors for the benefit of banks and other financial
institutions.
As of June 30, 2007, Pinnacle had total assets of
approximately $2.32 billion, total deposits of
approximately $1.80 billion, and total shareholders
equity of approximately $265.2 million.
Additional
Information Concerning Pinnacle
Information concerning:
|
|
|
|
|
directors and executive officers,
|
|
|
|
executive compensation,
|
|
|
|
principal shareholders,
|
|
|
|
certain relationships and related transactions, and
|
|
|
|
other related matters concerning Pinnacle
|
is included or incorporated by reference in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and in some cases
below under the caption PROPOSAL #3 FOR SHAREHOLDERS
OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.: AMENDMENT #3 TO THE
2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN. Additionally, financial
statements and information as well as managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations are included in the
Form 10-K
and in Pinnacles quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007. These reports are incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus. See WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION beginning on page 133. Shareholders of
either Pinnacle or
Mid-America
desiring a copy of such documents may contact Pinnacle at the
address listed on the inside front cover page, or the SEC also
maintains a web site on the Internet at www.sec.gov that
contains reports that Pinnacle files electronically with the
SEC. These reports also are available at Pinnacles website
at www.pnfp.com. The information contained on Pinnacles
website is not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and you should not consider it a part of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
ABOUT
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.
Mid-America
is a bank holding company that owns all of the issued and
outstanding securities of PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South,
both of which are Tennessee chartered commercial banks. They are
members of the FDIC but not of the Federal Reserve System.
Mid-America
is a financial services corporation incorporated under the laws
of the State of Tennessee. It was formed in 2006 for the purpose
of acquiring all of the issued and outstanding common stock of
the banks and it is a bank holding company within the meaning of
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.
Mid-America
is focused on developing their financial services businesses in
the Nashville-Davidson-Rutherford MSA in Tennessee and in other
areas (generally, in those counties contiguous to the Nashville
MSA).
Mid-America
provides a wide range of commercial banking services from
fourteen full-service banking offices to small and medium-sized
businesses, including those engaged in the real estate
construction and development business, local industry, business
executives, professionals and other individuals.
Mid-America
operates throughout their market areas with fourteen offices
located in Davidson, Wilson, Rutherford, Williamson, Cheatham,
and Dickson Counties in Tennessee, all of which are located in
the Nashville-Davidson-Rutherford MSA.
Through its subsidiary banks,
Mid-America
makes available a full-range of banking products to consumers,
commercial customers, professionals, builders and developers.
Mid-Americas
banks make loans principally to persons and businesses located
in
Mid-Americas
primary market areas. These banks offer a full-range of lending
products including commercial and real estate loans to
individuals, to small- to medium-sized businesses, and to
professional entities. These banks also make commercial and
residential mortgage loans to
106
finance the purchase of real property as well as loans to
smaller business ventures, credit lines for working capital and
short-term seasonal or inventory financing, including letters of
credit, that are also secured by real estate. In addition,
Mid-America
also makes available a variety of loans to individuals for
personal, family, and household purposes, including secured and
unsecured installment and term loans.
Mid-Americas
principal source of funds for loans and investing in securities
is core deposits. Its subsidiary banks offer a wide range of
deposit services, including checking, savings, money market
accounts, and certificates of deposits. These banks obtain most
of their deposits from individuals and businesses in their
respective market areas. A secondary source of funding is
through advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Cincinnati, subordinated debt and other borrowings which enable
Mid-Americas
banks to borrow funds at rates and terms, which at times, are
more beneficial to it than other funding sources.
Mid-America
has a networking arrangement with Raymond James Financial
Services, Inc., a registered broker-dealer and investment
adviser, to offer and sell various securities and other
financial products to the public. The investment products
offered through this arrangement include:
|
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
Fixed annuities
|
Stocks
|
|
Variable annuities
|
Money market instruments
|
|
Financial planning
|
Treasury securities
|
|
Asset management accounts
|
Bonds
|
|
Listed options
|
All of the financial products listed above are offered by
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., from
Mid-Americas
offices. As of December, 31, 2006,
Mid-America
had $279,958,000 in assets under management.
As of June 30, 2007,
Mid-America
had total assets of approximately $1.07 billion, total
deposits of approximately $904.7 million, and total
shareholders equity of approximately $104.7 million.
Additional
Information Concerning
Mid-America
Information concerning:
|
|
|
|
|
directors and executive officers,
|
|
|
|
executive compensation,
|
|
|
|
principal shareholders,
|
|
|
|
certain relationships and related transactions, and
|
|
|
|
other related matters concerning
Mid-America
|
is included or incorporated by reference in
Mid-Americas
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Additionally,
financial statements and information as well as
managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operation are included in the
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and in
Mid-Americas
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007. These reports are incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus. See WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION beginning on page 133. Shareholders of
either Pinnacle or
Mid-America
desiring a copy of such documents may contact
Mid-America
at the address listed on the inside front cover page, or the SEC
also maintains a web site on the Internet at www.sec.gov that
contains reports that
Mid-America
files electronically with the SEC. These reports also are
available at
Mid-Americas
website at ww.mid-americabancsharesinc.com. The information
contained on
Mid-Americas
website is not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and you should not consider it a part of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
107
PROPOSAL #2
FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.: ADJOURNMENT OF SPECIAL MEETINGS
In the event that there are insufficient votes to
(1) constitute a quorum, or (2) approve the merger
agreement and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in
connection with the merger at the time of the Pinnacle special
meeting, the merger could not be approved unless the meeting was
adjourned to a later date or dates in order to permit Pinnacle
to solicit additional proxies. In order to allow proxies that
have been received by Pinnacle at the time of the special
meeting to be voted for an adjournment, if necessary, Pinnacle
has submitted the question of adjournment to its shareholders as
a separate matter for their consideration. If a quorum does not
exist, adjournment of the special meeting requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, in person or
by proxy, at the special meeting. If a quorum exists, but there
are not enough affirmative votes to approve the merger agreement
and the issuance of Pinnacle common stock in connection with the
merger, the special meeting may be adjourned if the votes cast,
in person or by proxy, at the Pinnacle special meeting favoring
the proposal to adjourn exceed the votes cast, in person or by
proxy, opposing the proposal to adjourn. Abstentions and broker
non-votes are not counted as votes cast and thus have no impact
on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to solicit
additional proxies.
For the reasons set forth above, the Pinnacle board of
directors recommends that its shareholders vote For
this proposal. If it is necessary to adjourn the special
meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, no notice of the
adjourned meeting is required to be given to shareholders, other
than an announcement at the special meeting of the hour, date
and place to which the special meeting is adjourned. If the
special meeting is adjourned, Pinnacles shareholders who
have already sent in their proxies may revoke them at any time
prior to their use.
Mid-America
Special Meeting
In the event that there are insufficient votes to
(1) constitute a quorum or (2) approve the merger
agreement at the time of the
Mid-America
special meeting, the merger agreement could not be approved
unless the meeting was adjourned to a later date or dates in
order to permit
Mid-America
to solicit additional proxies. In order to allow proxies that
have been received by
Mid-America
at the time of the special meeting to be voted for an
adjournment, if necessary,
Mid-America
has submitted the question of adjournment to its shareholders as
a separate matter for their consideration. If a quorum does not
exist, adjournment of the special meeting requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, in person or
by proxy, at the special meeting. If a quorum exists, but there
are not enough affirmative votes to approve the merger
agreement, the special meeting may be adjourned if the votes
cast, in person or by proxy, at the
Mid-America
special meeting favoring the proposal to adjourn exceed the
votes cast, in person or by proxy, opposing the proposal to
adjourn. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as
votes cast and thus have no impact on the proposal to adjourn
the special meeting to solicit additional proxies.
For the reasons set forth above, the
Mid-America
board of directors recommends that its shareholders vote
For this proposal. If it is necessary to adjourn
the special meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, no notice
of the adjourned meeting is required to be given to
shareholders, other than an announcement at the special meeting
of the hour, date and place to which the special meeting is
adjourned. If the special meeting is adjourned,
Mid-Americas
shareholders who have already sent in their proxies may revoke
them at any time prior to their use.
PROPOSAL #3
FOR SHAREHOLDERS OF PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.: AMENDMENT
NO. 4 TO THE PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. 2004 EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
Pinnacles 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity
Incentive Plan) was adopted by Pinnacles
shareholders on April 20, 2004 and subsequently amended on
April 19, 2005, April 14, 2006 and September 19,
2006. The proposed amendment increases the number of shares
available for award under the Equity Incentive Plan by
500,000 shares.
108
Pinnacles board believes that the increase in the number
of shares available for awards is appropriate to allow the board
to continue Pinnacles historical practice of awarding
equity incentives to a broad-based group of Pinnacles
associates, including the significant number of new associates
as a result of the
Mid-America
merger, and better aligning their interest with shareholders of
Pinnacle.
Equity-based compensation advances the interests of Pinnacle by
encouraging and providing for the acquisition of equity interest
in Pinnacle by all of Pinnacles associates, thereby
providing substantial motivation for superior performance and
aligning their interest with shareholders of Pinnacle. In order
to provide Pinnacle with greater flexibility to adapt to
changing economic and competitive conditions, and to continue
its practice of attracting and retaining experienced associates,
the board proposed the adoption, subject to shareholder
approval, of an amendment of the Equity Incentive Plan to
increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for
issuance thereunder by 500,000 shares. The board believes
that the approval of this amendment is essential to further the
long-term stability and financial success of Pinnacle by
attracting, motivating and retaining qualified associates at all
levels of Pinnacle through the use of stock incentives.
The proposed amendment increases the number of shares of common
stock which may be issued under the Equity Incentive Plan by
500,000 shares or 3.2% of the 15,545,581 shares of
common stock outstanding on June 30, 2007. These
500,000 shares plus the 266,741 shares remaining
available for issuance and the 1,902,133 shares issuable
upon exercise of awards currently outstanding under the Equity
Incentive Plan, Pinnacles 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, which
we refer to as the 2000 Plan, and the 1999 Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.
Stock Option Plan, which we refer to as the Cavalry Plan, as of
June 30, 2007, will provide an aggregate of
2,668,874 shares available for issuance. Since inception
(or in the case of the Cavalry Plan, since March 15, 2000,
the day we acquired Cavalry) and through June 30, 2007,
245,882 shares (adjusted for subsequent stock splits) have
been acquired by employees under the Equity Incentive Plan, the
2000 Plan and the Cavalry Plan. Additionally, 70,795 shares
have been issued as restricted stock to executive officers and
directors.
Two measurements that are considered meaningful by some
shareholders in consideration of proposals to increase the
number of shares available for issuance under an equity
incentive plan are overhang ratios and stock
option burn rates. The overhang ratio is the ratio of all
common stock of a company that is reserved for issuance pursuant
to a stock option plan to total outstanding common stock plus
the impact of the issued stock options. Pinnacles overhang
ratio has ranged between 11.8% and 19.8% since inception. Should
the proposed amendment be approved by Pinnacles
shareholders and the merger with
Mid-America
be consummated, the overhang ratio would approximate 12.8% which
is consistent with prior periods. The following is an analysis
of Pinnacles overhang ratio as of the following selected
dates:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2000
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
After giving effect to
Pinnacles merger with Mid-America and approved of the
amendment to increase the shares reserved under the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
12.8
|
%*
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes impact of additional allocation of 500,000 shares
as contemplated by this proposal and consummation of
Pinnacles merger with
Mid-America
and the related assumption by Pinnacle of
Mid-Americas,
Bank of the Souths and PrimeTrust Banks various
stock option plans and the issuance of approximately
6.6 million Pinnacle shares in connection with the merger. |
A companys stock option burn rate is computed by dividing
the number of stock option grants in any particular period by
the number of outstanding shares of common stock at the end of
the period. The result is usually compared to industry data,
particularly data furnished by various shareholder services
groups.
109
Pinnacles burn rate for the year ended December 31,
2006 was 2.4%. Pinnacle believes that its burn rate for 2007
will be slightly less than its burn rate for 2006.
The following is an analysis of Pinnacles burn rate for
each of the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2000
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
A copy of the proposed amendment is included as
Appendix E hereto. If approved by the shareholders,
the amendment will become effective as of November 27, 2007.
Summary
of Material Provisions of the Equity Incentive Plan
The purpose of the Equity Incentive Plan is to promote the
interests of Pinnacle and its shareholders by, among other
things:
(i) Attracting and retaining associates through the
utilization of broad-based incentive plans such as the Equity
Incentive Plan;
(ii) Motivating such individuals by means of
performance-related incentives to achieve long-range performance
goals;
(iii) Enabling such individuals to participate in the
long-term growth and financial success of Pinnacle;
(iv) Encouraging ownership of stock in Pinnacle by such
individuals; and
(v) Linking their compensation to the long-term interests
of Pinnacle and its shareholders.
Because awards under the Equity Incentive Plan are at the
discretion of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee,
which we refer to as the Committee in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the benefits that will be awarded under
the Equity Incentive Plan to the Pinnacles named executive
officers (as identified below) or Pinnacles other
executive officers cannot be determined at this time.
To date, Pinnacle has awarded stock options pursuant to the
Equity Incentive Plan under a broad-based framework whereby all
employees have received stock option awards. Pinnacle wishes to
continue these broad-based awards and the Committee believes the
structure of the Equity Incentive Plan is appropriate for that
purpose. The Committee has also issued shares of restricted
stock to Pinnacles directors and members of executive
management. The proposed Equity Incentive Plan provides a
flexible solution to the Committee for long-term incentives to
employees including stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted shares and units, performance shares and performance
units.
As described in more detail below, the Equity Incentive Plan
contains the following provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
The Equity Incentive Plan prohibits the Committee from amending
the terms of previously granted options to reduce the exercise
price or canceling a previously granted option and substituting
another option with a lower exercise price. Pinnacle has never
repriced any of its options.
|
|
|
|
The Equity Incentive Plan provides that any options granted
under the Equity Incentive Plan, other than Substitute Awards
(as defined herein), may not be granted at less than the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
The Equity Incentive Plan limits to 50,000 the maximum number of
shares with respect to which all performance awards may be
granted to a Covered Officer (as defined in the Equity Incentive
Plan) in each year of the performance period and to five times
the Covered Officers annual salary the maximum
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
amount of any award to such an employee that may be settled in
cash in each year of the performance period.
|
The following is a brief summary of the principal features of
the Equity Incentive Plan, which is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Equity Incentive Plan itself, a copy of which
is attached as Appendix D to Pinnacles Proxy
Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as
amended by the First Amendment to Pinnacle Financial Partners,
Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached as
Appendix B to Pinnacles proxy statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting, and further amended by the Second Amendment to
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, a
copy of which is attached as Appendix D to Pinnacles
proxy statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting and the Third
Amendment to Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan, a copy of which is filed with Pinnacles
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, and incorporated
herein by reference.
Shares
Available for Awards under the Plan
Under the Equity Incentive Plan, awards may be made in common
stock. Subject to adjustment as provided by the terms of the
Equity Incentive Plan, the maximum number of shares of common
stock with respect to which awards may be granted under the
Equity Incentive Plan if the amendment described herein is
approved by Pinnacles shareholders is 1,779,510.
Shares of common stock subject to an award under the Equity
Incentive Plan or Pinnacles 2000 Stock Incentive Plan that
are cancelled, expire unexercised, forfeited, settled in cash or
otherwise terminated without a delivery of shares of common
stock to the participant, including, with respect to the Equity
Incentive Plan, shares of common stock withheld or surrendered
in payment of any exercise or purchase price of an award or
taxes relating to an award, remain available for awards under
the Equity Incentive Plan. Shares of common stock issued under
the Equity Incentive Plan may be either newly issued shares or
shares which have been reacquired by Pinnacle. Shares issued by
Pinnacle as substitute awards granted solely in assumption of
outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by
Pinnacle or with which Pinnacle combines (Substitute
Awards) do not reduce the number of shares available for
awards under the Equity Incentive Plan.
In addition, the Equity Incentive Plan imposes individual
limitations on the amount of certain awards in order to comply
with Section 162(m) of the Code. Under these limitations,
no single participant may receive options or SARs in any
calendar year that relate to more than 50,000 shares of
common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
With certain limitations, awards made under the Equity Incentive
Plan may be adjusted by the Committee in an equitable and
proportionate manner to prevent dilution or enlargement of
benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available
under the Equity Incentive Plan in the event of any stock
dividend, reorganization, recapitalization, stock split,
combination, merger, consolidation, change in laws, regulations
or accounting principles or other relevant unusual or
nonrecurring event affecting Pinnacle.
Eligibility
and Administration
Associates and directors of Pinnacle or its subsidiaries or
affiliates are eligible to be granted awards under the Equity
Incentive Plan. The Committee administers the Equity Incentive
Plan and is to be composed of not less than two non-employee
directors, each of whom is a non-employee director
for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and
Rule 16b-3
thereunder and an outside director within the
meaning of Section 162(m) and the regulations promulgated
under the Code. Subject to the terms of the Equity Incentive
Plan, the Committee is authorized to select participants,
determine the type and number of awards to be granted, determine
and later amend (subject to certain limitations) the terms and
conditions of any award, interpret and specify the rules and
regulations relating to the Equity Incentive Plan, and make all
other determinations which may be necessary or desirable for the
administration of the Equity Incentive Plan.
111
Stock
Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
The Committee is authorized to grant stock options, including
both incentive stock options, which can result in potentially
favorable tax treatment to the participant, and non-qualified
stock options. The Committee may specify the terms of such
grants subject to the terms of the Equity Incentive Plan. The
Committee is also authorized to grant stock appreciation rights,
or SARs, either with or without a related option, which SARs may
be settled in cash or common stock, as the Committee may
determine. The exercise price per share subject to an option is
determined by the Committee, but may not be less than the fair
market value of a share of common stock on the date of the
grant, except in the case of Substitute Awards. The maximum term
of each option or SAR, the times at which each option or SAR
will be exercisable, and the provisions requiring forfeiture of
unexercised options at or following termination of employment
generally are fixed by the Committee, except that no option or
tandem SAR relating to an option may have a term exceeding ten
years. Incentive stock options or tandem SARs related thereto
that are granted to holders of more than ten percent of
Pinnacles voting securities are subject to certain
additional restrictions, including a five-year maximum term and
a minimum exercise price of 110% of fair market value.
Restricted
Shares and Restricted Share Units
The Committee is authorized to grant restricted shares of common
stock and restricted share units. Restricted shares are shares
of common stock subject to transfer restrictions as well as
forfeiture upon certain terminations of employment prior to the
end of a restricted period or other conditions specified by the
Committee in the award agreement. A participant granted
restricted shares of common stock generally has most of the
rights of a shareholder of Pinnacle with respect to the
restricted shares, including the right to receive dividends, if
any, and the right to vote such shares. Except as provided in
the Equity Incentive Plan, none of the restricted shares may be
transferred, encumbered or disposed of during the restricted
period or until after fulfillment of the restrictive conditions.
Each restricted share unit has a value equal to the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. The
Committee determines, in its sole discretion, the restrictions
applicable to the restricted share units. A participant will be
credited with dividend equivalents on any vested restricted
share units at the time of any payment of dividends to
shareholders on shares of common stock. Except as determined
otherwise by the Committee, restricted share units may not be
transferred, encumbered or disposed of, and such units shall
terminate, without further obligation on the part of Pinnacle,
unless the participant remains in continuous employment of
Pinnacle for the restricted period and any other restrictive
conditions relating to the restricted share units are met.
Performance
Share and Performance Unit Awards
A performance share award consists of a right to receive shares
of common stock upon the achievement of certain performance
goals during certain performance periods as established by the
Committee, and payable at such time as the Committee shall
determine. Performance share awards may be paid in a lump sum or
in installments following the close of a performance period or
on a deferred basis, as determined by the Committee. Absent a
determination by the Committee to the contrary, a
participants rights to any performance share award may not
be transferred, encumbered or disposed of in any manner, except
by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
A performance unit award consists of a right that is
(1) denominated in cash, (2) valued, as determined by
the Committee, in accordance with the achievement of such
performance goals during such performance periods as the
Committee shall establish, and (3) payable at such time and
in such form as the Committee shall determine. Performance unit
awards may be paid in a lump sum or in installments following
the close of a performance period or on a deferred basis, as
determined by the Committee. Absent a determination by the
Committee to the contrary, a participants rights to any
performance unit award may not be transferred, encumbered or
disposed of in any manner, except by will or the laws of descent
and distribution.
112
Performance share and performance unit awards are subject to
certain specific terms and conditions under the Equity Incentive
Plan. Performance goals will be limited to one or more of the
following financial performance measures relating to Pinnacle or
any of its subsidiaries, operating units or divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
earnings or book value per share;
|
|
|
|
net income;
|
|
|
|
return on equity, assets, capital, capital employed or
investments;
|
|
|
|
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and/or
amortization;
|
|
|
|
operating income or profit;
|
|
|
|
operating efficiencies;
|
|
|
|
the ratio of criticized/classified loans to capital;
|
|
|
|
allowance for loan losses;
|
|
|
|
the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans;
|
|
|
|
the ratio of past due loans greater than 90 days and
non-accruals to total loans;
|
|
|
|
the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans;
|
|
|
|
after tax operating income;
|
|
|
|
cash flows;
|
|
|
|
total revenues or revenues per employee;
|
|
|
|
stock price or total shareholder return;
|
|
|
|
growth in deposits;
|
|
|
|
dividends;
|
|
|
|
strategic business objectives, consisting of one or more
objectives based on meeting specified cost targets, business
expansion goals and goals relating to acquisitions or
divestitures; or
|
|
|
|
any combination thereof.
|
Each goal may be expressed on an absolute
and/or
relative basis, may be based on or otherwise employ comparisons
based on internal targets, the past performance of Pinnacle or
any subsidiary, operating unit or division of Pinnacle
and/or the
past or current performance of other companies, and in the case
of earnings-based measures, may use or employ comparisons
relating to capital, shareholders equity
and/or
shares outstanding, or to assets or net assets.
To the extent necessary to comply with Section 162(m), with
respect to grants of performance share, performance unit and
other performance awards, no later than 90 days following
the commencement of each performance period (or such other time
as may be required or permitted by Section 162(m)), the
Committee will, in writing, (1) select the performance goal
or goals applicable to the performance period,
(2) establish the various targets and bonus amounts which
may be earned for such performance period, and (3) specify
the relationship between performance goals and targets and the
amounts to be earned by each covered officer for such
performance period. Following the completion of each performance
period, the Committee will certify in writing whether the
applicable performance targets have been achieved and the
amounts, if any, payable to covered officers for such
performance period. In determining the amount earned by a
covered officer for a given performance period, subject to any
applicable award agreement, the Committee shall have the right
to reduce (but not increase) the amount payable at a given level
of performance to take into account additional factors that the
Committee may deem relevant to the assessment of individual or
corporate performance for the performance period. With respect
to any covered officer, the maximum number of shares in respect
of which all performance awards may be granted under the Equity
Incentive Plan in each year of the performance period is 50,000
and the maximum amount of any award settled in cash is
$1,000,000 in each year of the performance period.
113
Other
Stock-Based Awards
The Committee is authorized to grant any other type of awards
that are denominated or payable in, valued by reference to, or
otherwise based on or related to shares of Pinnacle common
stock. The Committee will determine the terms and conditions of
these awards, consistent with the terms of the Equity Incentive
Plan.
Termination
of Employment
The Committee will determine the terms and conditions that apply
to any award upon a Termination of Service (as defined in the
Equity Incentive Plan) with Pinnacle, its subsidiaries and
affiliates, and provide these terms in the applicable award
agreement or in its rules or regulations.
Change
in Control
All outstanding awards vest, become immediately exercisable or
payable or have all restrictions lifted immediately upon a
Change in Control (as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan) but
only if, and to the extent, determined by the Committee.
Amendment
and Termination
Pinnacles board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or
terminate the Equity Incentive Plan or any portion of the Equity
Incentive Plan at any time, except that shareholder approval
must be obtained for any of these actions if the approval is
necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement with
which the board deems it desirable or necessary to comply. The
Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend any
terms of, or alter, suspend, discontinue, cancel or terminate
any award, either prospectively or retroactively. The Committee
does not have the power, however, to amend the terms of
previously granted options to reduce the exercise price per
share subject to an option or to cancel any options and grant
substitute options with a lower exercise price per share than
the cancelled options. The Committee also may not adversely
affect the rights of any award holder without the award
holders consent.
Other
Terms of Awards
Pinnacle may take action, including the withholding of amounts
from any award made under the Equity Incentive Plan, to satisfy
withholding and other tax obligations. The Committee may provide
for additional cash payments to participants to defray any tax
arising from the grant, vesting, exercise or payment of any
award. Awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan generally
may not be pledged or otherwise encumbered or transferred except
(1) by will or by the laws of descent and distribution;
(2) to a member of the participants immediate family
or a trust for the benefit of an immediate family member;
(3) to a partnership of which the only partners are members
of the participants immediate family; or (4) as
permitted by the Committee in its discretion. Incentive stock
options may not be pledged or otherwise encumbered or
transferred except by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution.
Certain
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief description of the current federal
income tax consequences generally arising with respect to awards
under the Equity Incentive Plan.
Tax consequences to Pinnacle and to participants receiving
awards will vary with the type of award. Generally, a
participant will not recognize income, and Pinnacle is not
entitled to take a deduction, upon the grant of an incentive
stock option, a nonqualified option, a reload option, a SAR, a
restricted share award, a performance share award or a
performance unit award. A participant will not have taxable
income upon exercising an incentive stock option (except that
the alternative minimum tax may apply). Upon exercising an
option other than an incentive stock option, the participant
must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the difference
between the exercise price and fair market value of the freely
transferable and non-forfeitable shares of common stock acquired
on the date of exercise.
114
If a participant sells shares of common stock acquired upon
exercise of an incentive stock option before the end of two
years from the date of grant and one year from the date of
exercise, the participant must generally recognize ordinary
income equal to the difference between (1) the fair market
value of the shares of common stock at the date of exercise of
the incentive stock option (or, if less, the amount realized
upon the disposition of the incentive stock option shares of
common stock), and (2) the exercise price. Otherwise, a
participants disposition of shares of common stock
acquired upon the exercise of an option (including an incentive
stock option for which the incentive stock option holding period
is met) generally will result in short-term or long-term capital
gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price
and the participants tax basis in the shares of common
stock (the tax basis generally being the exercise price plus any
amount previously recognized as ordinary income in connection
with the exercise of the option).
Pinnacle generally will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to
the amount recognized as ordinary income by the participant in
connection with an option. Pinnacle generally is not entitled to
a tax deduction relating to amounts that represent a capital
gain to a participant. Accordingly, Pinnacle will not be
entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an incentive stock
option if the participant holds the shares of common stock for
the incentive stock option holding periods prior to disposition
of the shares.
Similarly, the exercise of an SAR will result in ordinary income
on the value of the stock appreciation right to the individual
at the time of exercise. Pinnacle will be allowed a deduction
for the amount of ordinary income recognized by a participant
with respect to an SAR. Upon a grant of restricted stock or
performance shares, the participant will recognize ordinary
income on the fair market value of the common stock at the time
the shares become vested as a result of the restrictions lapsing
with respect to restricted shares or the achievement of the
performance goals with respect to performance shares unless a
participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the
Code to be taxed at the time of grant. The participant also is
subject to capital gains treatment on the subsequent sale of any
common stock acquired through the exercise of an SAR or
restricted share award. For this purpose, the participants
basis in the common stock is his or her fair market value at the
time the SAR is exercised or the restricted share becomes vested
(or is granted, if an election under Section 83(b) is made).
Payments made under performance awards settled in cash are
taxable as ordinary income at the time an individual attains the
performance goals and the payments are made available to the
participant.
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a public
companys tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of
$1 million in any tax year to its five most highly
compensated executives. However, compensation that qualifies as
performance-based compensation is excluded from this
$1 million deduction limit and therefore remains fully
deductible by the company that pays it. Pinnacle intends that
(1) performance awards, including performance share awards
and performance unit awards and (2) options granted
(a) with an exercise price at least equal to 100% of fair
market value of the underlying shares of common stock at the
date of grant and (b) to employees the Committee expects to
be named executive officers at the time a deduction arises in
connection with any awards, qualify as performance-based
compensation so that these awards will not be subject to
the Section 162(m) deduction limitations.
The foregoing discussion is general in nature and is not
intended to be a complete description of the federal income tax
consequences of the Equity Incentive Plan. This discussion does
not address the effects of other federal taxes or taxes imposed
under state, local or foreign tax laws. Participants in the
Equity Incentive Plan are urged to consult a tax advisor as to
the tax consequences of participation.
The Equity Incentive Plan is not intended to be a
qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Code.
115
The following table summarizes information concerning
Pinnacles equity compensation plans at December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
(Excluding
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Reflected in First
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
909,225
|
|
|
$
|
7.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
634,185
|
|
|
$
|
23.06
|
|
|
|
609,922
|
|
Cavalry Bancorp Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
115,049
|
|
|
$
|
10.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by shareholders
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,658,459
|
|
|
$
|
12.93
|
|
|
|
609,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the reasons set forth above, the Pinnacle board of
directors recommends that its shareholders vote FOR
the approval of the amendment to the Pinnacle Financial
Partners, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
PINNACLE
FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The duties and responsibilities of the Committee include, among
other things, overseeing Pinnacles overall executive
compensation philosophy; measuring performance with respect to
established goals and objectives; designing the components for
all executive compensation; and establishing the framework for
all compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and the other
named executive officers. The Committee is composed of three
independent directors.
Throughout this section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus,
the individual who served as Pinnacles Chief Executive
Officer during fiscal 2006, as well as the other individuals
included in the Summary Compensation Table, are referred to as
the named executive officers. Additionally, Pinnacle
has established a Leadership Team which is composed of the named
executive officers and other members of senior management of
Pinnacle.
Compensation Philosophy The objective
of Pinnacles executive compensation program is to attract
and retain experienced and high-achieving senior executives that
can enhance Pinnacles performance and shareholder returns.
The program seeks to provide significantly above peer overall
compensation if performance is significantly above that of peer
financial institutions and consistent with Pinnacles high
performance strategic objectives. Conversely, overall
compensation levels are reduced if performance objectives are
not met.
The Committee makes all compensation decisions for the named
executive officers, including establishing the framework on how
these executives are compensated, and approves recommendations
regarding equity awards to all associates, not just the
executives, of Pinnacle. The Committee receives recommendations
concerning these decisions from the Chief Executive Officer.
Decisions regarding the non-equity compensation of members of
the Leadership Team who are not named executive officers are
made by the Chief Executive Officer in consultation with each
Leadership Team members supervisor. For these officers,
the Chief Executive Officer is responsible for establishing the
framework on how these individuals are compensated. These
decisions, including salary adjustments and
116
annual equity and non-equity incentive plan award amounts, are
ultimately presented to the Committee for review and approval.
As is the case with the named executive officers, the Committee
can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended
adjustments or awards to these individuals.
Components of Executive Compensation
The three primary elements of executive compensation are:
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
Long-term Equity Compensation Incentive Plans.
|
Base Salary Base salary is designed to
provide reasonable levels of compensation to the executive.
Salaries for Pinnacles executive officers are reviewed
annually and are based on:
|
|
|
|
|
Job scope and responsibilities;
|
|
|
|
Corporate, business unit, and individual performance;
|
|
|
|
Competitive salaries for similar positions at peer
institutions; and
|
|
|
|
Other factors.
|
Annual Cash Incentive Plan All
non-commissioned associates of Pinnacle are eligible for
participation in the Annual Cash Incentive Plan which for 2006,
provided targeted cash incentive plan payments to the
participants at various levels ranging from 10% of base salary
to 50% of base salary. For the named executive officers and
certain other Leadership Team members, the targeted annual cash
award ranged from 30% to 50% of the officers base salary.
The Committee is responsible for administering the Annual Cash
Incentive Plan. For all participants, the award is based on
certain soundness thresholds and an annual earnings target.
Pinnacle believes that a single broad-based cash incentive plan
for both executives and associates promotes a strong sense of
teamwork within the firm. Furthermore, using a combination of an
annual earnings target and a longer-term soundness threshold
creates balance such that future performance is not sacrificed
for the benefit of current period results.
The Annual Cash Incentive Plan is structured such that the
Committee may increase payouts if Pinnacles actual
performance for the calendar year exceeded pre-established
performance targets or decrease or eliminate payouts if
performance was less than the pre-established performance
targets. Additionally, all participants must be rated at least
meets expectations against their individual goals
and objectives in their annual performance reviews to receive
any payouts under the Annual Cash Incentive Plan. The Chief
Executive Officer of Pinnacle also had discretionary authority
to increase any participants award, other than a named
executive officer, by 10% of a participants base salary or
decrease a participants award by 20% should the Chief
Executive Officer determine that the efforts of the participant
during 2006 warranted such an increase or decrease. The
Committee has the discretion to adjust goals to reflect unusual
circumstances. For example, in 2005 and 2006, the Committee
determined that the related charges associated with the Cavalry
acquisition should be excluded for purposes of determining
whether the annual earnings per share target was achieved.
In January 2007, the Committee determined that Pinnacle exceeded
its 2006 earnings targets while achieving its soundness
thresholds. The soundness threshold required that criticized and
classified assets be less than 25% of Tier 1 capital. At
December 31, 2006, this ratio was 12.1%. Additionally, the
annual earnings target for 2006 which would have resulted in a
100% target payout was $1.20 per fully-diluted share, excluding
merger-related charges. The Annual Cash Incentive Plan provided
for incentive payments at 120% of targeted award if fully
diluted earnings per share excluding merger related charges was
$1.25. Because Pinnacle achieved this higher earnings target for
2006, Pinnacle, based on the Committees instructions,
awarded the participants, including the named executive
officers, an award which approximated 120% of their
individually-targeted cash incentive award.
Long-term Equity Compensation Incentive Plans
In 2000, Pinnacles board adopted, and
Pinnacles shareholders approved, Pinnacles 2000
Stock Incentive Plan which is referred to as the 2000
Plan in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Under the
terms of the 2000 Plan, Pinnacles associates are eligible
to receive stock option awards for Pinnacles common stock.
In 2004, Pinnacles board adopted, and Pinnacles
shareholders approved, the Equity Incentive Plan. Under the
terms of the Equity Incentive Plan, Pinnacles
117
associates are eligible to receive equity-based incentive awards
including stock options, stock appreciation awards, restricted
shares of Pinnacles common stock, restricted stock units
and performance shares or units. The 2000 Plan and Equity
Incentive Plan reserved collectively 1,790,000 shares of
Pinnacles Common Stock for issuance to the eligible
participants.
The Committee believes that equity-based, long-term compensation
programs link the interests of senior management, both
individually and as a team, to the long-term interests of
Pinnacles stockholders. In 2006, the Committee granted
awards to Pinnacles named executive officers and other
Leadership Team members, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Named executive officers and other Leadership Team members
received stock option awards during 2006. All stock options
awarded to the named executive officers and other Leadership
Team members in 2006 vest over a five-year period and have value
only to the extent that Pinnacles common stock price
increases over the grant price during the ten-year exercise
period. This compensation element is totally at-risk in the
event that the stock price does not increase over the grant
price over the ten-year period. The more shareholder value
increases, the greater the compensation to the executives. Stock
options are typically granted at the Committees meeting in
January when the overall annual compensation for the named
executive officers is determined and shortly after the public
announcement of Pinnacles fourth quarter and annual
financial results. In setting 2006 compensation, the Committee
deferred granting options and establishing annual incentive
awards for the named executive officers until after the Cavalry
transaction was completed. Therefore, the option grants and
annual incentive awards were established at the Committees
March 14, 2006 meeting. Options are granted to new hires at
the Committee meeting following employment.
|
|
|
|
The Committee also grants shares of restricted stock to the
named executive officers and other Leadership Team members, the
forfeiture restrictions of which are tied to the achievement of
certain soundness and profitability thresholds as prescribed by
Pinnacles three-year performance plan as approved by
Pinnacles board of directors. For 2006, the awards were
granted on August 15, 2006 with the vesting criteria for
each of the three years of the performance period established on
that date. For 2007, the Committee approved the awards on
January 17, 2007 establishing on that date the vesting
criteria for the first year of the award and providing that the
vesting criteria for the second and third years of the
performance period will be set at the Committees meeting
following the full boards strategic planning meeting,
which is typically held in June of each year. The restrictions
associated with the restricted shares awarded to the named
executive officers and other Leadership Team members in 2006 and
2007 lapse in 33% increments upon the achievement of the
performance targets for each fiscal year in the three year
performance period or for the entire three-year period in the
event the one year targets are not met but the targets
established for the three-year period are met on a cumulative
basis. Therefore, the incentive is only earned if senior
management effectively manages Pinnacle to achieve sustained
longer-term performance within certain earnings and soundness
thresholds. The performance targets associated with the 2006
award were achieved and the restrictions associated with the
2006 traunche of the 2006 award have been released.
Additionally, the 2006 performance targets associated with the
2004 and 2005 awards were also achieved and the restrictions
associated with 2006 traunche of the 2004 and 2005 awards have
also been released.
|
Measuring Performance Pinnacles
board has established a strategic framework consisting of 20
financial and other measures in the critically important areas
of soundness, profitability, growth and market effectiveness.
The board has established long-term targets and annual targets
for the current and next two years
118
for each of these performance measures. These measurements
primarily include categories which are widely known in the
banking industry as well as several internally developed
benchmarks as follows:
|
|
|
Soundness
|
|
|
Criticized/classified assets to
capital
Nonperforming loans to total loans
Net charged-off loans to average loans
Total risk based capital ratio
Tangible equity ratio
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total
loans
Past due loans > 30 days
Tier 1 leverage ratio
Net noncore funding dependency
|
|
|
|
Profitability
|
|
|
Return on average assets
Fully-diluted earnings per share
Total noninterest income to total revenues
|
|
Return on average equity
Efficiency ratio
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
Growth
|
|
|
Growth in earnings per share year
over year
|
|
Growth in deposits year over year
|
|
|
|
Market
Effectiveness
|
|
|
Deposit market share
Internal operational quality index
|
|
Associate retention rates
|
The key performance measures noted above are integral parts of
Pinnacles strategic planning efforts. Annually, these
measurements are reviewed and, in some cases, the measures or
targets are modified by the board. These measurements provide a
basis for making qualitative judgments about performance and its
implication on compensation and incentive awards for
Pinnacles executive officers, particularly the Chief
Executive Officer.
Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive
Officers Compensation The goals of
Pinnacle require a CEO that can build a high-performing
financial franchise and in doing so:
|
|
|
|
|
Meet or exceed ongoing profitability goals;
|
|
|
|
Recruit and retain a work force which embraces the culture of a
high growth, values-oriented enterprise;
|
|
|
|
Market a financial firm that emphasizes distinctive service and
expert advice to clients;
|
|
|
|
Plan and execute the necessary capital raising efforts to
support the extraordinary growth;
|
|
|
|
Manage and measure the risk characteristics of the firm
(including soundness, operational, and reputation risks) such
that risks and returns remain in balance;
|
|
|
|
Conduct business that is consistent with the standards of the
various regulatory bodies; and
|
|
|
|
Provide for a corporate governance process that is considered
best practice among publicly held entities.
|
The Committees process for determining the compensation of
M. Terry Turner, Pinnacles CEO, and Pinnacles other
named executive officers, involved several steps and included
such items as the establishment of an appropriate basis for
benchmarking; benchmarking bank performance relative to peers on
key measures including those that are highly correlated to share
price performance; making qualitative and quantitative judgments
regarding the market equity of the named executive
officers versus benchmark ranges; profiling targeted
compensation and developing a change plan to implement the
results of the process, if necessary. Additionally, the
Committee elected to engage an outside consultant to assist in
the process and review the named executive officers
compensation, particularly the compensation of Pinnacles
CEO. During 2005 and 2006, the Committee engaged Mercer Human
Resource Consulting LLC to assist in these matters.
Benchmarking is an important part of the process of setting
Pinnacles compensation for its CEO. Publicly-held
companies are required to publish CEO compensation data in their
proxy materials, offering circulars and other filings with the
SEC. In addition, there are several entities that produce peer
comparisons based on that information. In order to establish the
CEOs compensation in 2006, Pinnacle utilized an extensive
annual executive compensation review compiled by SNL Financial.
This review compares executive compensation practices of
publicly held banking firms in the United States. As a part of
their annual
119
publication, this firm provides information on a total
option adjusted compensation basis and each of its
components for virtually all CEOs of publicly held banks
and thrifts. Total option adjusted compensation is
the sum of direct cash compensation, the value of other
compensation benefits (i.e., qualified pension plans, profit
sharing plans, etc.) and the value of any equity-based
compensation such as stock options and restricted stock awards
that may have been granted to the CEO. The Committee believes
that this review produced relevant and reliable information in
order to assess the competitive landscape for bank executives
with comparable job scope. In the SNL data utilized for
establishing 2006 compensation, SNL estimated option
adjusted compensation which includes an amount which
approximates fair value for stock options. This amount is
obtained by multiplying the exercise price times the number of
options granted in a year divided by three, which management and
the Committee believes allowed comparability across companies
and was a rough approximation of the more detailed Black-Scholes
model valuation, which was not available at the time.
For 2006, the Committee determined that compensation for a
select peer group of CEOs of banks with assets of
$1.6 billion to $2.5 billion was an appropriate
benchmark for Pinnacles CEO and that
Mr. Turners compensation should exceed the median
compensation for this peer group. The accumulated peer group
included 63 organizations. In addition to the benchmark, the
Committee considered other relevant matters such as competition,
the degree of difficulty in the annual or long-range plan,
affordability and other matters the Committee deemed important.
In establishing Mr. Turners compensation, the
Committee noted that Mr. Turner had led Pinnacle to
outstanding levels of performance in soundness, profitability,
growth and market effectiveness on both an annual and long-term
basis, and that shareholders had directly benefited from his
leadership. Specifically, the Committee compared Pinnacles
results to the peer groups results for total shareholder
return for the last three years, the growth rate in earnings per
share and the level of nonperforming assets to total assets and
noted that Pinnacle had performed at the 99th, 98th and
93rd percentile of the peer group, respectively, all in
excess of the 75th percentile. The Committee also
considered the level of increase in compensation components from
2005 amounts. As a result, for 2006, the Committee determined
that the total compensation for Pinnacles CEO should
approximate the 75th percentile of the selected peer group.
In establishing the components for the CEOs 2006
compensation, the Committee believed that a significant portion
of the compensation should be at risk and based on
the achievement of performance targets. The Committee determined
that if performance targets were met, then compensation would be
enhanced for meeting those goals and objectives. If performance
targets were not met, compensation would be negatively impacted.
The Committee also determined that outstanding results should
provide for significantly enhanced compensation. In 2006, the
Committee determined that the CEOs annual total
compensation should approximate the following guidelines:
|
|
|
|
|
40% to 50% should be in the form of base salary and
|
|
|
|
50% to 60% should be at-risk, or tied to the
achievement of short-and long-term performance targets.
|
|
|
|
Approximately one third of the at-risk compensation
should be in the form of a targeted cash incentive award
dependent on the firm meeting annual performance and soundness
targets.
|
|
|
|
Approximately two thirds of the at-risk compensation
should be longer-term in nature and directly linked to
shareholder value creation. This compensation could be in the
form of stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, etc. For longer-term compensation, the Committee
believed that it should have latitude to grant awards that are
both subject to time vesting and awards that vested pursuant to
the achievement of multi-year performance targets. As a result,
restricted share awards vest based on achievement of multi-year
performance targets for
2006-2008
while option awards vest 20% per year over a five-year term
without regard to performance.
|
The Committee concluded that approximately 54% of the CEOs
compensation for 2006 (compared to 55% in 2005) was
considered at risk and approximately 43% was in the form of base
salary (compared to 42% in 2005) with the remaining 3% of
the CEOs 2006 compensation being in the form of car
allowances, 401(k) plan match and other items. Therefore, the
mix of fixed versus at-risk compensation was
considered appropriate by the Committee. Furthermore, the
Committee concluded that approximately 40% of the CEOs
120
at-risk compensation for 2006 was in the form of
cash incentives and 60% was in the form of equity compensation
incentives. Therefore, the mix of cash versus equity
at-risk compensation was also considered appropriate
by the Committee.
Additionally, although other peer banks use other methods of
compensation (e.g., board fees, pension plans, country club
memberships, etc.), it was, and continues to be, the view of the
Committee and management that total compensation for
Pinnacles CEO should be largely comprised of
1) direct cash compensation and 2) equity-based
compensation which rewards the CEO for achievement of the
firms goals and objectives and the creation of long-term
shareholder value. The Committee does, however, have the
flexibility to utilize other forms of compensation as
circumstances arise and provided the CEO with an automobile
allowance of $13,200 during 2006.
Under the terms of Pinnacles Annual Cash Incentive Plan,
during 2006, the CEO was eligible to receive an incentive
payment targeted at 50% of his base salary based on
Pinnacles and the CEOs performance during the year.
Due to Pinnacle exceeding its established 2006 performance
targets for payment at 50% of base salary, and consistent with
the board approved plan, the amount paid the CEO was equal to
60% of the CEOs base salary for the 2006 fiscal year.
The CEOs employment agreement, which was executed in 2000,
automatically renews each day, so that the agreement always has
a three-year term, unless any of the parties to the agreement
gives notice of intent not to renew the agreement. The agreement
also includes severance in the event of certain terminations of
employment or changes in control. The amount of such severance
could be as high as up to three times current salary and target
bonus. Please see PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Employment Agreements
on page 128 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The Committee has also established the compensation framework
for the other named executive officers in a manner similar to
that of the CEO. During 2006, the Committee concluded that
Pinnacles Chairman of the board should be the second
highest paid executive and, given that the Chairman serves
Pinnacle on a full time basis in a variety of roles, including
being Pinnacles lead business development officer, set the
Chairmans compensation at 95% of the CEOs
compensation for all compensation components.
The Committee also concluded that the Chief Administrative
Officer would be the third highest paid executive; the Chief
Financial Officer would be the fourth highest paid executive and
the Chief Credit Officer would be the fifth highest paid
executive. Ranking these three executives in this manner
facilitated the comparison of compensation packages to peer
information. In comparing the 2006 compensation package for
these three named executive officers, the Committee used the
same executive compensation review compiled by SNL Financial
that was used for the CEO. Total compensation was again used as
the benchmark by which to determine the percentile to assign the
2006 compensation for the CAO, CFO and Chief Credit Officer.
In making these determinations, the Committee noted that
(1) these three named executive officers had contributed
directly to Pinnacles outstanding levels of performance in
soundness, profitability, growth and market effectiveness on
both an annual and long-term basis; (2) the firm had
performed above the 90th percentile compared to the peer
groups results for total shareholder return for the last
three years; (3) the growth rate in earnings per share and
the level of nonperforming assets to total assets were better
than 93% of the peer group; and (4) the shareholders had
directly benefited from their contributions.
Federal
Income Tax Deductibility Limitations
The Committee believes it is appropriate to take into account
the $1,000,000 limit on the deductibility of executive
compensation for federal income tax purposes pursuant to
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and to seek to qualify Pinnacles long-term
compensation awards as performance-based compensation excluded
from the $1,000,000 limit. The Committee believes that all
incentive compensation of Pinnacles current executive
officers, other than those stock option awards issued as
incentive stock options, and not subsequently disqualified,
pursuant to Pinnacles 2000 Plan and the Equity Incentive
Plan, will qualify as a tax deductible expense. The Committee
will continue to evaluate, however, whether it will
121
approve annual compensation arrangements exceeding $1,000,000
and whether it will attempt to qualify any such amounts for
deductibility under the federal tax laws.
2007
Compensation Update
The previous discussion primarily addressed our compensation
philosophies, processes and results for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006. The Committee modified such processes
for 2007 such that in setting compensation for the named
executive officers, the Committee utilized the services of
Mercer Human Resources Consulting LLC to a greater degree than
in previous years, particularly in establishing the peer group
for comparison purposes and assisting in the design of the 2007
compensation plan for the five named executive officers. After
reviewing the short-term and longer-term performance of
Pinnacle, the Committee concluded that the named executive
officers should be compensated at the 75th percentile of
the newly established peer group with base salary approximating
the 60th percentile. As a result, at risk
compensation, which would include cash incentive awards,
restricted share awards and stock option awards, was established
at higher levels than the prior years such that the total
compensation would approximate the aforementioned
75th percentile. Consistent with 2006 and based on
information provided by Mercer, the compensation for the
Chairman of the board remains at 95% of the President and CEO
compensation in 2007.
As a result of the change in processes in setting 2007
compensation, total compensation for 2007 for the named
executive officers increased in comparison to 2006.
Mr. Turners total compensation has increased by 50%;
Mr. McCabes increased by 55%; Mr. Queeners
increased by 39%; Mr. Carpenters increased by 60% and
Mr. McMahans increased by 7%.
Human
Resources and Compensation Committee Report
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of Pinnacle has
reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
required by Item 402(b) of
Regulation S-K
with management and, based on such review and discussions, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Gregory L. Burns, Chairman
James L. Shaub, II, Member
Reese L. Smith, III, Member
Named
Executive Officer Compensation
The table below summarizes the compensation paid or accrued by
Pinnacle during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 for
(i) Pinnacles Chief Executive Officer;
(ii) Pinnacles Chief Financial Officer; and
(iii) the three highest paid executive officers of Pinnacle
whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for fiscal 2006
(collectively, the named executive officers). When
setting total compensation for each of the named executive
officers, the Committee reviews tally sheets which show the
executives current compensation, including equity and
non-equity based compensation. Each of the named executive
officers, other than Mr. McMahan, has entered into an
employment agreement with Pinnacle, the terms of which are
described below.
The named executive officers were not entitled to receive
payments which would be characterized as Bonus
payments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Bonuses for purposes of the table below consist of
discretionary amounts not associated with an approved incentive
plan, such as a relocation bonus. Amounts listed under the
column title Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation,
were determined by the Committee at its January 19, 2007
meeting and were paid out shortly thereafter.
Based on the fair value of equity awards granted to named
executive officers in fiscal 2006 and the base salary of the
named executive officers, Salary accounted for
approximately 50.8% of the total compensation of the named
executive officers, Non-equity incentive plan
compensation accounted for approximately 27.1% of the
total compensation of the named executive officers, stock and
option awards accounted for
122
approximately 18.0% of the total compensation and all other
compensation accounted for approximately 4.1% of the total
compensation of the named executive officers.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,534
|
|
|
$
|
114,966
|
|
|
$
|
246,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,302
|
|
|
$
|
844,802
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
389,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,234
|
|
|
$
|
107,775
|
|
|
$
|
233,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,618
|
|
|
$
|
802,827
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugh M. Queener
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
234,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,084
|
|
|
$
|
74,421
|
|
|
$
|
112,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,081
|
|
|
$
|
472,906
|
|
Chief Administrative
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,233
|
|
|
$
|
33,347
|
|
|
$
|
84,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,670
|
|
|
$
|
318,250
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles B. McMahan
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,155
|
|
|
$
|
28,738
|
|
|
$
|
63,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,994
|
|
|
$
|
286,886
|
|
Chief Credit
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock Awards Since 2004, Pinnacle has awarded
restricted shares to certain executive officers, including the
named executive officers. The restrictions on these shares lapse
in 33% annual increments upon the achievement of certain
soundness and performance thresholds for the current fiscal year
and the next two fiscal years. Based on achievement of the
soundness and performance thresholds for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006, the restrictions for the 2006 Award did
lapse as did similar restrictions on restricted share awards for
the 2004 and 2005 awards. All awards were issued pursuant to the
terms of the Equity Incentive Plan. The amount in column
(e) reflects the dollar amount recognized for financial
statement purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006, in accordance with SFAS 123(R) of awards pursuant to
the Equity Incentive Plan and thus includes amounts from awards
granted in and prior to 2006. Assumptions used in the
calculations of these amounts are included in footnote 14 to
Pinnacles audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006 included in Pinnacles Annual
Report of
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. There were no
forfeited restricted share awards in 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Option Awards All options are granted at an
exercise price that equals the closing price of Pinnacles
common stock on the date of grant. All awards expire ten years
from date of issuance and vest in 20% increments on the
anniversary date of the grant. The awards prior to 2006 were
issued as incentive stock options while the 2006 awards are
classified as nonstatutory stock options. All awards were issued
pursuant to the terms of the 2000 Plan or the Equity Incentive
Plan. The amount in column (f) reflects the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement purposes for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006, in accordance with
SFAS 123(R) of awards pursuant to the 2000 Plan and the
Equity Incentive Plan and thus includes amounts from awards
granted in and prior to 2006. Assumptions used in the
calculations of these amounts are included in footnote 14 to
Pinnacles audited consolidated financial statements for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 included in
Pinnacles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007 and in footnotes 1
and 12 to Pinnacles audited consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
included in Pinnacles Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on February 20, 2004. There were no forfeited stock
option grants for the named executive officers in 2006, however,
14,836 previously granted stock option awards were forfeited by
employees of Pinnacle during 2006. |
123
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation Reflects compensation
attributable to Pinnacles 2006 Annual Cash Incentive Plan
in which all non-commissioned based associates participate.
Actual and target payouts are expressed as a percentage of base
salary. Payout of incentive compensation occurs upon achievement
of certain soundness and performance thresholds as determined by
the Committee. Subject to the plans provisions, payout for
2006 was at 120% of target for all associates as well as each
named executive officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner
|
|
|
McCabe
|
|
|
Queener
|
|
|
Carpenter
|
|
|
McMahan
|
|
|
2006% Target
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
2006% Payment
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
2006 Payment
|
|
$
|
246,000
|
|
|
$
|
233,700
|
|
|
$
|
112,320
|
|
|
$
|
84,000
|
|
|
$
|
63,000
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Other Compensation Pinnacle provides the
named executive officers with other forms of compensation. The
following is a listing of various types of other compensation
that Pinnacle has not used in the past but may consider in the
future to award its executives. We believe that including a
listing of forms of compensation that we currently do not use is
beneficial to investors as they compare our compensation
elements to those of other organizations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner
|
|
|
McCabe
|
|
|
Queener
|
|
|
Carpenter
|
|
|
McMahan
|
|
|
Stock appreciation rights granted
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Stock performance units granted
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Supplemental retirement plans
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Pension plan
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Board fees
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Group benefit package All Pinnacle
associates, including the named executive officers, participate
in Pinnacles group benefit package which includes
customary medical and dental benefits, group life, group
disability, healthcare and dependent care reimbursement plans,
401k plan, etc. The named executive officers receive no
incremental employee benefits that are not offered to other
Pinnacle associates, other than an enhanced long-term disability
policy that provides incremental coverage over the group policy
maximums. The following is a summary of the expense Pinnacle
incurred during 2006 to provide a 401k plan match to our named
executive officers and the cost of the enhanced long term
disability policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner
|
|
|
McCabe
|
|
|
Queener
|
|
|
Carpenter
|
|
|
McMahan
|
|
|
401k match
|
|
$
|
16,927
|
|
|
$
|
16,109
|
|
|
$
|
9,888
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
Long term disability policy
|
|
$
|
5,175
|
|
|
$
|
6,309
|
|
|
$
|
2,993
|
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
Paid time off Each named executive officer
receives an allotment of 25 days for paid time off each
year (excluding holidays). Pinnacle does not provide sick leave
for any associate, including the named executive officers.
Additionally, associates, including the named executive
officers, are not permitted to carryover unused paid time off
into a subsequent fiscal year.
Other Executive perquisites: Pinnacle provided
the following perquisites to the named executive officers in
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner
|
|
McCabe
|
|
Queener
|
|
Carpenter
|
|
McMahan
|
|
Company provided vehicles
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Automobile allowance
|
|
$
|
13,200/year
|
|
|
$
|
13,200/year
|
|
|
$
|
13,200/year
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Parking allowances
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Personal tax return fees paid
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Health club membership
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Country club membership
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
No
|
|
Corporate aircraft
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
124
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2006:
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards (1)
|
|
Awards (2)
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Number of
|
|
or Base
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Securities
|
|
Price of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock or
|
|
Options
|
|
Awards
|
|
Option
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Date
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Units (#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($/share)
|
|
Awards
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(d)
|
|
(e)
|
|
(f)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
|
(i)
|
|
(j)
|
|
(k)
|
|
(l)
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
3/17/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,866
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
230,784
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,000
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
532,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|
|
3/17/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,673
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
219,248
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
505,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Hugh M. Queener
|
|
|
3/17/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,933
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
115,392
|
|
Chief Administrative
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
238,000
|
|
|
$
|
476,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
3/17/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,189
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
88,858
|
|
Chief Financial
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
192,500
|
|
|
$
|
385,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Charles B. McMahan
|
|
|
3/17/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
80,774
|
|
Chief Credit Officer
|
|
|
8/15/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
130,200
|
|
|
$
|
260,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts shown in column (c) reflect the minimum payment
level under Pinnacles 2007 Annual Cash Incentive Plan
which is 0% of the target amount shown in column (d). The amount
shown in column (e) is 200% of such target amount. These
amounts are based on the individuals current salary and
position. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects an award of restricted shares under the Equity
Incentive Plan. The amounts shown in column (g) reflect the
restricted share award targeted number of shares that can be
earned over a three-year vesting period. This is also the
maximum number of shares that can be earned by the named
executive officer over the three-year period thus it is the same
number in column (h). All awards in column (g) and
(h) could be forfeited should Pinnacle not meet the
performance and soundness targets for these awards. The
restrictions on these shares lapse in 33% annual increments upon
the achievement of certain soundness and performance thresholds
for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2006, 2007 and
2008. The named executive officer is entitled to vote these
shares and receive any dividends payable with respect thereto,
if any, prior to the lapsing of the forfeiture restrictions
thereon. Based on achievement of the soundness and performance
thresholds for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the
restrictions for the 2006 Award did lapse as did similar
restrictions on restricted share awards from 2004 and 2005
awards. As a result, the threshold amounts above in column
(f) reflect the vesting of the 2006 traunche. The following
is the number of shares each named executive officer was awarded
in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner
|
|
McCabe
|
|
Queener
|
|
Carpenter
|
|
McMahan
|
|
No. of awards
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
Grant date fair value of each award
|
|
$
|
34.96
|
|
|
$
|
34.96
|
|
|
$
|
34.96
|
|
|
$
|
34.96
|
|
|
$
|
34.96
|
|
Aggregate value of award
|
|
$
|
112,000
|
|
|
$
|
103,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
125
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown in column (j) reflect the number of stock
options granted pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan during
2006. All options are granted at an exercise price that equals
the closing price of Pinnacles common stock at the date of
grant. All of the reflected awards expire ten years from date of
issuance and vest in 20% increments on the anniversary date of
the grant. The awards prior to 2006 were issued as incentive
stock options while the 2006 awards are classified as
nonstatutory stock options. All awards were issued pursuant to
the terms of the 2000 Plan or the Equity Incentive Plan. The
amount in column (l) reflects the dollar amount to be
recognized for financial statement purposes in accordance with
SFAS 123(R) over the vesting period. Assumptions used in
the calculations of these amounts are included in footnote 14 to
Pinnacles audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2006 included in Pinnacles Annual
Report of
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 28, 2007. The following are
the number of options to acquire common stock granted to each
named executive officer during 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turner
|
|
McCabe
|
|
Queener
|
|
Carpenter
|
|
McMahan
|
|
Grant date
|
|
|
Mar. 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
Mar. 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
Mar. 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
Mar. 15, 2006
|
|
|
|
Mar. 15, 2006
|
|
No. of option awards
|
|
|
23,866
|
|
|
|
22,673
|
|
|
|
11,933
|
|
|
|
9,189
|
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
Grant date fair value of each
option award
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
|
$
|
9.67
|
|
Aggregate value of award
|
|
$
|
230,784
|
|
|
$
|
219,248
|
|
|
$
|
115,392
|
|
|
$
|
88,858
|
|
|
$
|
80,774
|
|
126
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2006:
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Option Awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Shares, Units or
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
Shares, Units or
|
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
That
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
Other Rights
|
|
|
That
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Vested (3) (#)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
|
3/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
$
|
110,557
|
|
|
|
|
4,422
|
|
|
|
17,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
1/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,056
|
|
|
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.78
|
|
|
|
4/26/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
2/26/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
2/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
|
3/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
$
|
102,851
|
|
|
|
|
3,943
|
|
|
|
15,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
1/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.78
|
|
|
|
4/26/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
2/26/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
2/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugh M. Queener
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
|
3/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
$
|
67,189
|
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
13,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
1/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
|
7,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.78
|
|
|
|
4/26/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
2/26/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,600
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
2/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
|
3/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,3 90
|
|
|
$
|
46,130
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
1/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.78
|
|
|
|
1/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
|
|
2/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3/1/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
12/19/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles B, McMahan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.11
|
|
|
|
3/17/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,381
|
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
1/19/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.78
|
|
|
|
1/12/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.46
|
|
|
|
12/31/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All option awards vest in 20% increments annually over the
10-year
option term. |
|
(2) |
|
Unearned restricted share awards as of December 31, 2006
are for those shares which have vesting criteria tied to 2007
and 2008 performance and soundness targets. The 2006 restricted
share award is 66.7% unearned at December 31, 2006 as 33.3%
of the award has restrictions that tied to 2007 performance and
soundness targets and 33.3% that are tied to 2008 targets. The
2005 restricted share award is 33.3% unearned because 33.3% of
the award is associated with 2007 performance and soundness
targets. |
127
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Market value is determined by multiplying the closing market
price of Pinnacles common stock on December 29, 2006
by the number of shares. |
The following table details the number of options exercised
during 2006, the value realized from those exercises as of the
date of exercise, the number of restricted shares that vested
during 2006 and the value realized on those shares as of the
vesting date for the named executive officers:
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
|
Acquired on
|
|
|
Realized on
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercise (#)
|
|
|
Exercise ($)
|
|
|
Vesting (#)
|
|
|
Vesting ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
82,433
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
|
$
|
385,834
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
$
|
76,789
|
|
Hugh M. Queener
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
$
|
52,412
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
$
|
35,268
|
|
Charles B. McMahan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
$
|
27,464
|
|
Employment
Agreements
Pinnacle entered into a three-year employment contract with M.
Terry Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer, on
August 1, 2000. The agreement automatically renews for an
additional day each day after March 31, 2000, so that it
will always have a three-year term, unless any of the parties to
the agreement gives notice of intent not to renew the agreement.
Pursuant to this agreement with Mr. Turner, Pinnacle will
be obligated to pay Mr. Turner his base salary for the
following terminating events:
|
|
|
Payment Obligation Terminating Event
|
|
In relation to Base Salary
|
|
Mr. Turner becomes permanently
disabled
|
|
Maximum of six months
|
Pinnacle terminates Mr.
Turners employment without cause, as defined in the
agreement
|
|
End of agreements term, but
not more than three years
|
Mr. Turner terminates his
employment for cause, as defined
|
|
Maximum of twelve months
|
Mr. Turner terminates his
employment within twelve months after a change of control, as
defined
|
|
Three times base salary and target
bonus, plus benefits
|
Pinnacle entered into a three-year employment contract with
Robert A. McCabe, Jr., Chairman of the Board on
August 1, 2000. The agreement automatically renews for an
additional day each day after August 1, 2000, so that it
will always have a three-year term, unless any of the parties to
the agreement gives notice of intent not to renew the agreement.
Pursuant to this agreement with Mr. McCabe, Pinnacle will
be obligated to pay Mr. McCabe his base salary under the
same terms and conditions as described above under
Mr. Turners agreement for certain terminating events.
Pinnacle entered into a three-year employment contract with Hugh
M. Queener, Chief Administrative Officer, on December 4,
2000. The agreement automatically renews for an additional day
each day after April 1, 2000, so that it will always have a
three-year term, unless any of the parties to the agreement
gives notice of intent not to renew the agreement. Pursuant to
this agreement with Mr. Queener, Pinnacle will be obligated
to pay Mr. Queener his base salary under the same terms and
conditions as described above under Mr. Turners
agreement for certain terminating events.
Pinnacle entered into a three-year employment contract with
Harold R. Carpenter, Chief Financial Officer, on March 14,
2006. The agreement automatically renews for an additional day
each day after March 14, 2006, so that it will always have
a three-year term, unless any of the parties to the agreement
gives notice of intent
128
not to renew the agreement. Pursuant to this agreement with
Mr. Carpenter, Pinnacle will be obligated to pay
Mr. Carpenter his base salary under the same terms and
conditions as described above under Mr. Turners
agreement for certain terminating events.
The employment agreements set forth above for
Messrs. Turner, McCabe, Queener and Carpenter, contain
provisions that if the executive terminates his employment with
Pinnacle for cause within a year following a
change of control, the executive shall be entitled
to a lump sum severance payment equal to three times the
executives then current salary and target bonus, plus
certain retirement benefits plus tax payments. Generally, this
change of control provision is typically referred to
as a double trigger such that (a) a change of
control has to occur as defined in the employment agreements and
(b) the executive has to terminate his employment for
cause, again as defined in the employment agreement,
as follows:
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
A change of control generally means the acquisition
by a person or group of 40% or more of the voting securities of
Pinnacle or Pinnacle National Bank; a change in the majority of
the board over a twelve-month period (unless the new directors
were approved by a two-thirds majority of prior directors); a
merger, consolidation or reorganization in which Pinnacles
shareholders before the merger own 50% or less of the voting
power after the merger; or the sale, transfer or assignment of
all or substantially all of the assets of Pinnacle and its
subsidiaries to any third party.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Termination for cause generally means that
immediately following the change of control, the executive no
longer reports to the same supervisor he reported to prior to
the change of control, a change in supervisory authority such
that the associates that reported to the executive prior to the
change of control no longer report to the executive, a material
modification in the executives job title or scope of
responsibility, a change in office location of more than
25 miles from the executives current office location
or a material change in salary, bonus opportunity or other
benefit.
|
Also and in the event of a change of control, the executive will
receive three years of Company-provided health plan benefits
subsequent to his termination. In addition, the executive will
be indemnified by Pinnacle for any excise tax due under
Section 4999 of the Code of an amount sufficient to place
the executive in the same after-tax position as the executive
would have been had no excise tax been imposed upon or incurred
or paid by the executive. The executive is also entitled to
receive assistance from a qualified accounting firm of his
choice not to exceed $2,500 per year for three years.
Furthermore, in the event of a change of control, any unvested
restricted share awards, pursuant to the restricted share
agreements with the executives noted above, would immediately
vest. All unvested stock option grants would only vest pursuant
to a change of control with the approval of the Committee.
129
The following is a tabular presentation of the amounts that
would be owed the named executive officers pursuant to the
various events detailed above assuming the event occurred on
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Employee
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
Cause or
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
of a Change
|
|
|
|
Disability(4)
|
|
|
Death(4)
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Retires
|
|
|
of Control
|
|
|
M. Terry Turner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 base salary
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,000
|
|
2006 cash incentive payment
|
|
$
|
205,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,000
|
|
|
$
|
205,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
615,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
615,000
|
|
|
$
|
615,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
615,000
|
|
Multiplier (in terms of years)
|
|
|
x.5
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
x 1
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cash payment
|
|
$
|
307,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,845,000
|
|
|
$
|
615,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,845,000
|
|
Health insurance $800
per month
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,800
|
|
Tax assistance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Intrinsic value of unvested stock
options that immediately vest(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,116,170
|
|
Value of unearned restricted shares
that immediately vest
|
|
$
|
110,557
|
|
|
$
|
110,557
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,557
|
|
Payment for excise tax and gross
up(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
674,707
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
823,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
418,057
|
|
|
$
|
110,557
|
|
|
$
|
2,529,307
|
|
|
$
|
617,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,931,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 base salary
|
|
$
|
389,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
389,500
|
|
|
$
|
389,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
389,500
|
|
2006 cash incentive payment
|
|
$
|
194,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,750
|
|
|
$
|
194,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
584,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
584,250
|
|
|
$
|
584,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
584,250
|
|
Multiplier (in terms of years)
|
|
|
x.5
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
x 1
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cash payment
|
|
$
|
292,125
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,750
|
|
|
$
|
584,250
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,750
|
|
Health insurance $800
per month
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,800
|
|
Tax assistance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Intrinsic value of unvested stock
options that immediately vest(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,609
|
|
Value of unearned restricted shares
that immediately vest
|
|
$
|
102,851
|
|
|
$
|
102,851
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102,851
|
|
Payment for excise tax and gross
up(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
635,760
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
772,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
394,976
|
|
|
$
|
102,851
|
|
|
$
|
2,398,110
|
|
|
$
|
586,650
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,697,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Employee
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinnacle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Terminates
|
|
|
Cause or
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
of a Change
|
|
|
|
Disability(4)
|
|
|
Death(4)
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Retires
|
|
|
of Control
|
|
|
Hugh M. Queener
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 base salary
|
|
$
|
234,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
234,000
|
|
|
$
|
234,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
234,000
|
|
2006 cash incentive payment
|
|
$
|
93,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,600
|
|
|
$
|
93,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
327,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
327,600
|
|
|
$
|
327,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
327,600
|
|
Multiplier (in terms of years)
|
|
|
x.5
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
x 1
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cash payment
|
|
$
|
163,800
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982,800
|
|
|
$
|
327,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
982,800
|
|
Health insurance $800
per month
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,800
|
|
Tax assistance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Intrinsic value of unvested stock
options that immediately vest(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
758,479
|
|
Value of unearned restricted shares
that immediately vest
|
|
$
|
67,189
|
|
|
$
|
67,189
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,189
|
|
Payment for excise tax and gross
up(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
336,086
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
431,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
230,989
|
|
|
$
|
67,189
|
|
|
$
|
1,328,486
|
|
|
$
|
330,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,276,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harold R. Carpenter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 base salary
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
175,000
|
|
2006 cash incentive payment
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245,00
|
|
Multiplier (in terms of years)
|
|
|
x.5
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
x 1
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cash payment
|
|
$
|
112,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,000
|
|
|
$
|
245,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,000
|
|
Health insurance $800
per month
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,800
|
|
Tax assistance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Intrinsic value of unvested stock
options that immediately vest(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
272,074
|
|
Value of unearned restricted shares
that immediately vest
|
|
$
|
46,130
|
|
|
$
|
46,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,130
|
|
Payment for excise tax and gross
up(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,877
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
307,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
168,630
|
|
|
$
|
46,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,003,477
|
|
|
$
|
247,400
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,397,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles B. McMahon(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 base salary
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
2006 cash incentive payment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Multiplier (in terms of years)
|
|
|
x.5
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
x 1
|
|
|
|
x 0
|
|
|
|
x 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate cash payment
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Health insurance $800
per month
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Tax assistance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of unvested stock
options that immediately vest(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
255,178
|
|
Value of unearned restricted shares
that immediately vest
|
|
$
|
36,381
|
|
|
$
|
36,381
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,381
|
|
Payment for excise tax and gross
up(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,381
|
|
|
$
|
36,381
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
291,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Vesting of stock option awards pursuant to a change of control
may only occur upon the consent of the Committee. |
|
(2) |
|
In determining the anticipated payment due the executive for
excise tax and gross up pursuant to a termination by Pinnacle of
the employee without cause or a termination within twelve months
following a change of control by the employee for cause,
Pinnacle has included in the calculation the anticipated value
of the immediate vesting of previously unvested restricted share
awards and stock option grants in addition to the cash payments
and healthcare benefits noted above. As a result, Pinnacle has
computed the 20% excise tax obligation owed by
Messrs. Turner, McCabe, Queener and Carpenter in the event
Pinnacle terminates their employment without cause to be
$304,000, $286,000, $151,000 and $116,000, respectively and in
the event of a change of control to be $371,000, $347,000,
$194,000 and $139,000, respectively. As a result, Pinnacle has
assumed a personal income tax rate of 45% for each executive and
has included the additional gross up amount in the table above.
Pinnacle has not anticipated such excise tax or gross up
payments for other terminating events as payments for such
matters would be extended over a period of time such that the
executives compensation would likely not be subject to
section 280(g) of the Code. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. McMahan does not have an employment agreement with
Pinnacle. |
|
(4) |
|
The above amounts do not include benefits owed the named
executive officers or their estates pursuant to Pinnacles
broad based group disability insurance policies or group life
insurance policy. These benefits would be paid pursuant to these
group polices which are provided to all employees of Pinnacle.
Additionally, and also not included in the above amounts, the
named executive officers and certain other Leadership Team
members also participate in a supplemental group disability
policy which provides incremental coverage (i.e., gap
coverage) for these individuals over the broad-based group
disability coverage maximums. |
Ownership
Guidelines
The Committee also requires the CEO and all other named
executive officers to maintain a meaningful personal ownership
in Pinnacle in the form of common stock. Periodically, the
Committee may establish minimum common stock beneficial
ownership levels for the CEO and the other named executive
officers. In 2006, the Committee established common stock
beneficial ownership levels for the CEO and the Chairman of the
Board of 50,000 shares of Company common stock.
Additionally, the Committee established stock beneficial
ownership levels of 25,000 shares for the Chief
Administrative Officer and 10,000 shares for both the Chief
Financial Officer and the Chief Credit Officer. All named
executive officers currently exceed the applicable minimum level
of beneficial ownership.
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
boards of directors know of no matters that will be presented
for consideration at the Pinnacle and
Mid-America
special meetings, respectively, other than as described in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. However, if any other matters
shall properly come before the Pinnacle and
Mid-America
special meetings or any adjournment or postponement of such
meetings and are voted on, the enclosed proxy will be deemed to
confer authority to the individuals named as proxies therein to
vote the shares represented by such proxy as directed by a
majority of the members and their respective boards of directors
as to these matters.
FUTURE
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
If the merger transaction is consummated,
Mid-America
shareholders will become shareholders of Pinnacle. Pursuant to
regulations issued by the SEC, to be considered for inclusion in
Pinnacles proxy statement for presentation at
Pinnacles 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, all
shareholder proposals must be mailed to Hugh M. Queener,
Corporate Secretary, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., 211
Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee 37201, and
must be received no later than the close of business on
December 18, 2007. After this date, a shareholder who
intends to raise a proposal to be acted upon at
132
Pinnacles 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, but who
does not desire to include the proposal in Pinnacles 2008
proxy statement, must inform Pinnacle in writing no later than
January 29, 2008. If notice is not provided by that date,
Pinnacles board of directors may exclude such proposals
from being acted upon at Pinnacles 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders. Further, if Pinnacles board elects not to
exclude the proposal from consideration at the 2008 meeting
(although not include in the 2008 proxy materials), the persons
named as proxies in Pinnacles proxy statement for its 2008
annual meeting of shareholders may exercise their discretionary
authority to act upon any such proposal.
Mid-America
held its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders on April 24,
2007. In light of the expected timing of the effectiveness of
the merger,
Mid-America
does not currently expect to hold an annual meeting of its
shareholders in 2008. If
Mid-America
holds an annual meeting of shareholders in 2008, any shareholder
who wishes to propose a matter for inclusion in
Mid-Americas
proxy materials for such a meeting must submit the proposal in
writing to the Secretary of
Mid-America
at
Mid-Americas
principal executive offices no later than January 31, 2008.
If
Mid-America
holds an annual meeting in 2008 and if the meeting is held on a
date more than 30 calendar days from April 24, 2008, a
shareholder proposal must be received by a reasonable time
before
Mid-America
begins to print and mail its proxy solicitation for the annual
meeting. Shareholder proposals should be submitted to the
Secretary of
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc. at 2019 Richard Jones Road, Nashville,
Tennessee 37215. Any of these proposals must comply with
Mid-Americas
bylaws and applicable SEC regulations.
The consolidated financial statements of Pinnacle as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006
have been incorporated by reference herein and in the
registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by
reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in accounting and auditing. The audit report covering the
December 31, 2006 financial statements refers to a change
in accounting for stock-based compensation.
The consolidated financial statements of
Mid-America
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, have been
incorporated by reference herein and in the registration
statement in reliance on the reports of Maggart &
Associates, P.C., independent registered public accounting
firm, incorporated by reference herein, and upon the authority
of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC, Nashville, Tennessee will pass
upon the legality of the shares of Pinnacle common stock to be
issued in the merger and certain tax consequences of the merger.
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Pinnacle has filed a registration statement (File
No. 333-146128)
with the SEC under the Securities Act that registers the shares
of Pinnacle common stock offered to
Mid-America
shareholders pursuant to the merger. The registration statement,
including the attached exhibits and schedules, contains
additional information about Pinnacle and Pinnacle common stock.
The SECs rules allow Pinnacle and
Mid-America
to omit certain information included in the registration
statement from this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The
registration statement may be inspected and copied at the
SECs public reference facilities described below.
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
also file reports and other information with the SEC under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. You may
read and copy this information at the Public Reference Room at
the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. You may obtain information about the Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports,
proxy statements and other information about issuers, like
Pinnacle and
Mid-America,
that file reports electronically with the SEC. The address of
that site is www.sec.gov.
133
The SEC allows Pinnacle and
Mid-America
to incorporate by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus certain information that each company files
with the SEC. This means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to those documents. Any
information we incorporate by reference is considered part of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for information
superseded by information in, or incorporated by reference into,
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus incorporates by reference the documents set
forth below that previously have been filed with the SEC. These
documents contain important information about our companies and
their finances.
Pinnacle SEC Filings (File
No. 000-31225):
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed on January 8, 2007, January 19, 2007,
January 25, 2007, February 5, 2007, April 9,
2007, April 17, 2007, July 18, 2007, August 15,
2007 and September 21, 2007; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The description of Pinnacles common stock contained in its
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A/12G,
filed with the SEC on August 3, 2000 (File
No. 000-31225)
|
Mid-America
SEC Filings (File
No. 000-52212):
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and June 30,
2007;
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
filed on February 12, 2007, February 21, 2007,
April 24, 2007, June 20, 2007, July 26, 2007 and
August 15, 2007; and
|
Pinnacle and
Mid-America
also are incorporating by reference additional documents filed
by them with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, after the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and before the adjournment of the Pinnacle
and
Mid-America
special meetings.
Neither Pinnacle nor
Mid-America,
however, is incorporating by reference any documents or portions
thereof, whether specifically listed above or filed in the
future, that are not deemed filed with the SEC,
including without limitation any information furnished pursuant
to Items 2.02 or 7.01 of
Form 8-K
or certain exhibits furnished pursuant to Item 9.01 of
Form 8-K.
All information contained or incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus that relates to Pinnacle, as
well as all pro forma financial information, was supplied by
Pinnacle and all information contained or incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus that
relates to
Mid-America
was supplied by
Mid-America.
134
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and between
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
and
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC.
Dated as of August 15, 2007
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
ARTICLE I. THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
The Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Effects of the Merger
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
Conversion of Target Common
Stock
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
Acquiror Capital
Stock
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
Options and Other Stock-Based
Awards
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Charter
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
Bylaws
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
Tax Consequences
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
Certain Post-Closing
Matters
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
Headquarters of Surviving
Corporation
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II. DELIVERY OF MERGER
CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Deposit of Merger
Consideration
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Delivery of Merger
Consideration
|
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III. REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES OF ACQUIROR
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Corporate
Organization
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Authority; No
Violation
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
Consents and
Approvals
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
Reports
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
Brokers Fees
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or
Events
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
Taxes and Tax Returns
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
SEC Reports
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
Compliance with Applicable
Law
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
Certain Contracts
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
Agreements with Regulatory
Agencies
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk Management
Instruments
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
Undisclosed
Liabilities
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
Environmental
Liability
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
Information Supplied
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
Internal Controls
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
Opinion of Acquiror Financial
Advisor
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
ARTICLE IV. REPRESENTATIONS AND
WARRANTIES OF Target
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Corporate
Organization
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
Authority; No
Violation
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
Consents and
Approvals
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
Reports
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
Brokers Fees
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or
Events
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
Taxes and Tax Returns
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
|
SEC Reports
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
Compliance with Applicable
Law
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
Certain Contracts
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
Agreements with Regulatory
Agencies
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk Management
Instruments
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
|
Undisclosed
Liabilities
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
Environmental
Liability
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
4.21
|
|
|
Reorganization
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
Information Supplied
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
|
Internal Controls
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
Opinion of Target Financial
Advisor
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V. COVENANTS RELATING TO
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
Conduct of Businesses Prior to
the Effective Time
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
Target Forbearances
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
Acquiror Forbearances
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
Regulatory Matters
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
Shareholders
Approvals
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
Legal Conditions to
Merger
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
Stock Quotation or
Listing
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans;
Existing Agreements
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
Indemnification;
Directors and Officers Insurance
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
Additional Agreements
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
Advice of Changes
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
Exemption from Liability Under
Section 16(b)
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
Bank Merger
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
ARTICLE VII. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys
Obligation To Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of
Target
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of
Acquiror
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII. TERMINATION AND
AMENDMENT
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
Termination Fee
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX. GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
Nonsurvival of Representations,
Warranties and Agreements
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
Entire Agreement
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
|
9.10
|
|
|
Publicity
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
9.11
|
|
|
Assignment; Third Party
Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
9.12
|
|
|
Specific Performance
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
A-iii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of August 15, 2007
(this Agreement), by and between
MID-AMERICA
BANCSHARES, INC., a Tennessee corporation
(Target), and PINNACLE FINANCIAL, PARTNERS,
INC., a Tennessee corporation (Acquiror).
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Acquiror and Target have
approved, and deem it advisable and in the best interests of
their respective corporations and shareholders to consummate the
strategic business combination transaction provided for herein
in which Target will, subject to the terms and conditions set
forth herein, merge with and into Acquiror (the
Merger), so that Acquiror is the surviving
corporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to in such capacity
as the Surviving Corporation) in the Merger;
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of Acquiror and Target have
each determined that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby are consistent with, and in furtherance of,
their respective business strategies and goals;
WHEREAS, the parties desire to make certain representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Merger and also to prescribe certain conditions to the
Merger; and
WHEREAS, for Federal income tax purposes, it is intended that
the Merger will qualify as a reorganization under the provisions
of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and the parties intend,
by executing this Agreement, to adopt a plan of reorganization
within the meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.368-2(g).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,
representations, warranties and agreements contained herein, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I.
THE MERGER
1.1 The Merger.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
in accordance with the Tennessee Business Corporation Act (the
TBCA), at the Effective Time (as defined
below), Target shall merge with and into Acquiror. Acquiror
shall be the Surviving Corporation in the Merger, and shall
continue its corporate existence under the laws of the State of
Tennessee. Upon consummation of the Merger, the separate
corporate existence of Target shall terminate.
(b) The parties may by mutual agreement at any time change
the method of effecting the combination of Target and Acquiror
including without limitation the provisions of this
Article I, if and to the extent they deem such
change to be desirable, including without limitation to provide
for a merger of Target with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Acquiror; provided, however, that no such
change shall (i) alter or change the amount of Merger
Consideration (as defined below) to be provided to holders of
Target Common Stock (as defined below) as provided for in this
Agreement, (ii) adversely affect the tax treatment of
holders of Target Common Stock as a result of receiving the
Merger Consideration or (iii) materially impede or delay
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
1.2 Effective Time. The Merger shall
become effective as set forth in the articles of merger that
shall be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Tennessee (the Tennessee Secretary) on the
Closing Date. The term Effective Time shall
be the date and time when the Merger becomes effective, as set
forth in the Articles of Merger.
1.3 Effects of the Merger. At and after
the Effective Time, the Merger shall have the effects set forth
in
Section 48-21-108
of the TBCA.
A-1
1.4 Conversion of Target Common Stock. At
the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any
action on the part of Target, Acquiror or the holder of any of
the following securities:
(a) Subject to Section 2.2(e), each share of
the common stock, $1.00 par value per share, of Target (the
Target Common Stock) issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time together with those
restricted shares of Target Common Stock set forth in
Section 1.4(a) of the Target Disclosure Schedule (as
defined below) which are not issued and outstanding as of the
Effective Time, except for Target Bancorp Dissenting Shares (as
defined below), shares of Target Common Stock owned by Target or
Acquiror (other than shares of Target Common Stock held in trust
accounts, managed accounts and the like, or otherwise held in a
fiduciary capacity, that are beneficially owned by third parties
(any such shares held in a fiduciary capacity by Target or
Acquiror, as the case may be, being referred to herein as
Trust Account Shares)) or shares of
Target Common Stock held on account of a debt previously
contracted (DPC Shares), shall be converted
into the right to receive (i) 0.4655 shares (the
Exchange Ratio) of the common stock,
$1.00 par value per share, of Acquiror (the
Acquiror Common Stock) together with cash in
lieu of any fractional shares in accordance with the provisions
of Section 2.2(e) of this Agreement (the
Stock Consideration) and (ii) $1.50 in
cash, without interest (the Cash
Consideration and together with the Stock
Consideration, the Merger Consideration).
(b) All of the shares of Target Common Stock converted into
the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant to this
Article I shall no longer be outstanding and shall
automatically be cancelled and shall cease to exist as of the
Effective Time, and each certificate previously representing any
such shares of Target Common Stock (each, a
Certificate) shall thereafter represent only
the right to receive (i) a certificate representing the
Stock Consideration in whole shares of Acquiror Common Stock
together with any cash in lieu of fractional shares pursuant to
Section 2,2(e); and (ii) the Cash Consideration
deliverable with respect to the shares represented by such
Certificate, into which the shares of Target Common Stock
represented by such Certificate have been converted pursuant to
this Section 1.4 and Section 2.2(e).
Certificates previously representing shares of Target Common
Stock, other than shares of Target Common Stock owned by Target
or Acquiror (other than Trust Account Shares and DPC
Shares) or Target Bancorp Dissenting Shares, shall be exchanged
for (i) certificates representing whole shares of Acquiror
Common Stock, equal to the Stock Consideration, together with
any cash in lieu of fractional shares; and (ii) the Cash
Consideration in consideration therefor upon the surrender of
such Certificates in accordance with Section 2.2,
without any interest thereon. If, prior to the Effective Time,
the outstanding shares of Acquiror Common Stock or Target Common
Stock shall have been increased, decreased, changed into or
exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities
as a result of a reorganization, recapitalization,
reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock
split, or other similar change in capitalization, an appropriate
and proportionate adjustment shall be made to the Exchange Ratio
per share payable pursuant to this Agreement.
(c) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, at the Effective Time, all shares of Target Capital
Stock (as defined below) that are owned by Target or Acquiror
(other than Trust Account Shares and DPC Shares) shall be
cancelled and shall cease to exist, and no Merger Consideration
shall be delivered in exchange therefor.
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, shares of Target Common Stock which are outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time and with respect to
which dissenters rights shall have been properly demanded
in accordance with
Sections 48-23-201,
et. seq. of the TBCA (Target Bancorp Dissenting
Shares) shall not be converted into the right to
receive, or to be exchangeable for, the Merger Consideration
but, instead, the holders thereof shall be entitled to payment
of the appraised value of such Target Bancorp Dissenting Shares
in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 48-23-201,
et. seq. of the TBCA; provided, however, that
(i) if any holder of Target Bancorp Dissenting Shares shall
subsequently deliver a written withdrawal of his demand for
appraisal of such shares, or (ii) if any holder fails to
establish his entitlement to dissenters rights as provided
in
Sections 48-23-201,
et. seq. of the TBCA, such holder or holders (as the case may
be) shall forfeit the right to appraisal of such shares of
Target Common Stock and each of such shares shall thereupon be
deemed to have been converted into the right to receive, and to
have become exchangeable for, as of the
A-2
Effective Time, the Merger Consideration, without any interest
thereon, as provided in Sections 1.4(a) and
1.4(b) and Article II hereof.
1.5 Acquiror Capital Stock. At and after
the Effective Time, each share of Acquiror Capital Stock (as
defined below) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Closing Date shall remain issued and outstanding and shall not
be affected by the Merger.
1.6 Options and Other Stock-Based Awards.
(a) Effective as of the Effective Time, each then
outstanding option to purchase shares of Target Common Stock
(each a Target Stock Option) and stock
appreciation right to be settled in shares of Target Common
Stock (each a Target SAR) issued pursuant to the
equity-based compensation plans identified in
Section 4.11 of the Target Disclosure Schedule (the
Target Stock Plans) to any current or former
employee or director of, or consultant to, Target or any of its
Subsidiaries, as defined below, shall be assumed by Acquiror and
shall be converted automatically into an option to purchase a
number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock (rounded to the
nearest whole share) in the case of a Target Stock Option (an
Assumed Stock Option) or a stock appreciation right
to be settled in shares of Acquiror Common Stock (rounded to the
nearest whole share) in the case of a stock appreciation right
(an Asssumed SAR) as the case may be, at an exercise
price determined as provided below (and otherwise subject to the
terms of the Target Stock Plans and the agreements evidencing
the options or stock appreciation rights thereunder):
(i) The number of shares of Acquiror Common Stock to be
subject to the Assumed Stock Option or Assumed SAR shall be
equal to the product of the number of shares of Target Common
Stock subject to the Target Stock Option or Target SAR, as the
case may be, and the Exchange Ratio, provided that any
fractional shares of Acquiror Common Stock resulting from such
multiplication shall be rounded to the nearest whole
share; and
(ii) The exercise price per share of Acquiror Common Stock
under the Assumed Stock Option shall be equal to (A) the
exercise price per share of Target Common Stock under the Target
Stock Option less the Cash Consideration per share, divided by
(B) the Exchange Ratio, provided that such exercise price
shall be rounded to the nearest whole cent. The exercise price
per share of Acquiror Common Stock under the Assumed SAR shall
be equal to (A) the exercise price per share of the Target
Common Stock under the Target SAR less the Cash Consideration
per share, divided by (B) the Exchange Ratio, provided
that such exercise price shall be rounded to the nearest
whole cent.
In the case of any Target Stock Option to which Section 421
of the Code applies by reason of its qualification under
Section 422 of the Code, the conversion formula shall be
adjusted, if necessary, to comply with Section 424(a) of
the Code. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Assumed Stock
Options and Assumed SARs shall be subject to the same terms and
conditions (including expiration date, vesting and exercise
provisions) as were applicable to the corresponding Target Stock
Options or Target SARs immediately prior to the Effective Time
(but taking into account any changes thereto, including the
acceleration of vesting thereof, provided for in the Target
Stock Plans or other Target Benefit Plan, as defined below, or
in any award agreement thereunder by reason of this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby); provided, however, that
references to Target shall be deemed to be references to
Acquiror.
(b) Acquiror has taken all corporate action necessary to
reserve for issuance a sufficient number of shares of Acquiror
Common Stock upon the exercise of the Assumed Stock Options and
Assumed SARs. As soon as reasonably practicable following the
Closing Date, Acquiror shall file a registration statement on an
appropriate form or a post-effective amendment to a previously
filed registration statement under the Securities Act (defined
below) with respect to the issuance of the shares of Acquiror
Common Stock subject to the Assumed Stock Options and Assumed
SARs and shall use its reasonable efforts consistent with
customary industry standards to maintain the effectiveness of
such registration statement or registration statements (and
maintain the current status of the prospectus or prospectuses
contained therein) for so long as such equity awards remain
outstanding.
1.7 Charter. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time, the Charter
of Acquiror, as then amended (the Acquiror
Charter), shall be the Charter of the Surviving
Corporation until thereafter amended in accordance with
applicable law.
A-3
1.8 Bylaws. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time, the Bylaws
of Acquiror, as then amended (the Bylaws), shall be
the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended
in accordance with applicable law.
1.9 Tax Consequences. It is intended that
the Merger shall constitute a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code and that this
Agreement shall constitute a plan of reorganization
for the purposes of Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.
1.10 Certain Post-Closing Matters.
(a) Board Composition. At the
Effective Time, and continuing until Acquirors next
shareholders meeting following the Effective Time, three Current
Target Directors, as defined below, shall be appointed to and
shall serve on the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation. For purposes of this Section 1.10, the
term Current Target Directors shall mean
those members of the Target Board of Directors immediately prior
to the public announcement of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(b) Procedure for Appointing Current Target Directors
to Surviving Corporations Board of
Directors. Prior to the Effective Time, the
nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board of
Directors of Target shall submit the names of three Current
Target Directors to the nominating and corporate governance
committee of Acquiror for consideration of nomination to fill
three vacancies created by the Board of Directors of the
Surviving Corporation as of the Effective Time. The nominating
and corporate governance committee of Acquirors Board of
Directors shall promptly meet to consider the nominations of
such persons to fill such vacancies and shall nominate such
persons at such meeting if such persons are reasonably
acceptable candidates to serve on the Board of Directors of the
Surviving Corporation. The Board of Directors of Acquiror shall
thereafter promptly meet to consider the appointment of such
persons and shall appoint such persons unless a majority of the
members of the Acquirors Board of Directors shall disagree
with the conclusions of the nominating and corporate governance
committee. In the event the nominating and corporate governance
committee or the Board of Directors of Acquiror objects to a
nominee, the nominating and corporate governance committee of
Targets Board of Directors shall propose additional
nominees for consideration until a reasonably acceptable member
is found.
(c) Officers of Surviving
Corporation. The current officers of Acquiror
shall continue as the officers of the Surviving Corporation.
(d) Survival/Adoption of
Commitments. The commitments set forth in
this Section 1.10 shall survive the Effective Time.
1.11 Headquarters of Surviving
Corporation. From and after the Effective Time,
the location of the headquarters and principal executive offices
of the Surviving Corporation shall be that of the headquarters
and principal executive offices of Acquiror as of the date of
this Agreement.
ARTICLE II.
DELIVERY OF
MERGER CONSIDERATION
2.1 Deposit of Merger Consideration. At
or immediately prior to the Effective Time, Acquiror shall
deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with a bank or trust
company reasonably acceptable to each of Target and Acquiror
(the Exchange Agent), for the benefit of the
holders of Certificates, for exchange in accordance with this
Article II, the Cash Consideration, certificates
representing the shares of Acquiror Common Stock constituting
the Stock Consideration and cash in lieu of any fractional
shares (such cash and certificates for shares of Acquiror Common
Stock, together with any dividends or distributions with respect
thereto, being hereinafter referred to as the Exchange
Fund), to be issued pursuant to
Section 1.4 and paid pursuant to
Section 1.4 and Section 2.2(e) in
exchange for outstanding shares of Target Common Stock.
2.2 Delivery of Merger Consideration.
(a) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than five
business days, after the Effective Time, the Exchange Agent
shall mail to each holder of record of one or more Certificates
a letter of transmittal in
A-4
customary form as reasonably agreed by the parties (which shall
specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and
title to the Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the
Certificates to the Exchange Agent) and instructions for use in
effecting the surrender of the Certificates in exchange for the
Merger Consideration. Upon proper surrender to the Exchange
Agent of a Certificate or Certificates for exchange and
cancellation, together with such properly completed and duly
executed letter of transmittal in such form as the Exchange
Agent may reasonably require, the holder of such Certificate or
Certificates shall be entitled to receive in exchange therefor,
as applicable, (i) the Merger Consideration that such
holder of Target Common Stock shall have become entitled
pursuant to the provisions of Article I; and
(ii) a check representing the amount of any dividends or
distributions that such holder is entitled to receive pursuant
to Section 2.2(b), and the Certificate or
Certificates so surrendered shall forthwith be cancelled. No
interest will be paid or accrued on any cash or on any unpaid
dividends and distributions payable to holders of Certificates.
(b) No dividends or other distributions declared with
respect to Acquiror Common Stock shall be paid to the holder of
any unsurrendered Certificate with respect to the shares of
Acquiror Common Stock represented thereby until the holder
thereof shall surrender such Certificate in accordance with this
Article II. After the surrender of a Certificate in
accordance with this Article II, the record holder
thereof shall be entitled to receive any such dividends or other
distributions, without any interest thereon, which theretofore
had become payable with respect to shares of Acquiror Common
Stock represented by such Certificate.
(c) If any certificate representing shares of Acquiror
Common Stock is to be issued in a name other than that in which
the Certificate or Certificates surrendered in exchange therefor
is or are registered, it shall be a condition of the issuance
thereof that the Certificate or Certificates so surrendered
shall be properly endorsed (or accompanied by an appropriate
instrument of transfer) and otherwise in proper form for
transfer, and that the person requesting such exchange shall pay
to the Exchange Agent in advance any transfer or other taxes
required by reason of the issuance of a certificate representing
shares of Acquiror Common Stock in any name other than that of
the registered holder of the Certificate or Certificates
surrendered, or required for any other reason, or shall
establish to the reasonable satisfaction of the Exchange Agent
that such tax has been paid or is not payable.
(d) After the Effective Time, there shall be no transfers
on the stock transfer books of Target of the shares of Target
Common Stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time,
certificates representing such shares are presented for transfer
to the Exchange Agent, they shall be cancelled and exchanged for
the Merger Consideration.
(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein, no certificates or scrip representing fractional shares
of Acquiror Common Stock shall be issued upon the surrender for
exchange of Certificates, no dividend or distribution with
respect to Acquiror Common Stock shall be payable on or with
respect to any fractional share, and such fractional share
interests shall not entitle the owner thereof to vote or to any
other rights of a shareholder of Acquiror. In lieu of the
issuance of any such fractional share, Acquiror shall pay to
each former shareholder of Target who otherwise would be
entitled to receive such fractional share an amount in cash
determined by multiplying (i) the average of the
closing-sale prices of Acquiror Common Stock on the securities
market or stock exchange in which the Acquiror Common Stock
principally trades, as reported by The Wall Street
Journal for the five (5) trading days immediately
preceding the date of the Effective Time by (ii) the
fraction of a share (rounded to the nearest thousandth when
expressed in decimal form) of Acquiror Common Stock to which
such holder would otherwise be entitled to receive pursuant to
Section 1.4.
(f) Any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains unclaimed
by the shareholders of Target as of the first anniversary of the
Effective Time shall be paid to Acquiror. Any former
shareholders of Target who have not theretofore complied with
this Article II shall thereafter look only to
Acquiror for payment of the Merger Consideration and any unpaid
dividends and distributions on the Acquiror Common Stock
deliverable in respect of each share of Target Common Stock such
shareholder holds as determined pursuant to this Agreement, in
each case, without any interest thereon. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, none of Target, Acquiror, the Exchange Agent or any
other person shall be liable to any former holder of shares of
Target Common Stock for any amount delivered in good faith to a
public official pursuant to applicable abandoned property,
escheat or similar laws.
A-5
(g) In the event any Certificate shall have been lost,
stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that
fact by the person claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen
or destroyed and, if reasonably required by Acquiror, the
posting by such person of a bond in such amount as Acquiror may
determine is reasonably necessary as indemnity against any claim
that may be made against it with respect to such Certificate,
the Exchange Agent will issue the Merger Consideration in
exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate.
ARTICLE III.
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF ACQUIROR
Except as disclosed in (a) the Acquiror Reports (defined
below) filed prior to the date hereof or (b) the disclosure
schedule (the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule)
delivered by Acquiror to Target prior to the execution of this
Agreement (which schedule sets forth, among other things, items
the disclosure of which is necessary or appropriate either in
response to an express disclosure requirement contained in a
provision hereof or as an exception to one or more
representations or warranties contained in this
Article III or to one or more of Acquirors
covenants contained in Article V, provided, however,
that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, (i) no such item is required to be set forth in
such schedule as an exception to a representation or warranty if
its absence would not result in the related representation or
warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect under the standard
established by Section 9.2, and (ii) the mere
inclusion of an item in such schedule as an exception to a
representation or warranty shall not be deemed an admission that
such item represents a material exception or material fact,
event or circumstance or that such item has had or would be
reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect (as defined
below) on Acquiror), Acquiror hereby represents and warrants to
Target as follows:
3.1 Corporate Organization.
(a) Acquiror is a corporation duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Tennessee. Acquiror has the corporate power and authority to own
or lease all of its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as it is now being conducted, and is duly licensed or
qualified to do business in each jurisdiction in which the
nature of the business conducted by it or the character or
location of the properties and assets owned or leased by it
makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except where
the failure to be so licensed or qualified would not, either
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect
on Acquiror. As used in this Agreement, the term
Material Adverse Effect means, (A) with
respect to Target, a material adverse effect on (i) the
business, operations, results of operations, financial condition
or prospects of Target and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole, or
(ii) the ability of Target to timely consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby and (B) with respect to
Acquiror, a material adverse effect on (i) the business,
operations, results of operations, financial condition or
prospects of Acquiror and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or
(ii) the ability of Acquiror to timely consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby; provided, however, that
with respect to clause (A)(i) and B(i) the following shall not
be deemed to have a Material Adverse Effect: any change or event
caused by or resulting from (I) changes in prevailing
interest rates, currency exchange rates or other economic or
monetary conditions in the United States or elsewhere,
(II) changes in United States or foreign securities
markets, including changes in price levels or trading volumes,
(III) changes or events, after the date hereof, affecting
the financial services industry generally and not specifically
relating to Acquiror or Target or their respective Subsidiaries,
as the case may be, (IV) changes, after the date hereof, in
generally accepted accounting principles or regulatory
accounting requirements applicable to banks or savings
associations and their holding companies generally,
(V) changes, after the date hereof, in laws, rules or
regulations of general applicability or interpretations thereof
by any Governmental Entity (as defined below), (VI) actions
or omissions of Acquiror or Target taken with the prior written
consent of the other or required hereunder, (VII) the
execution and delivery of this Agreement or the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby or the announcement
thereof, or (H) any outbreak of major hostilities in which
the United States is involved or any act of terrorism within the
United States or directed against its facilities or citizens
wherever located; and provided, further, that in no event shall
a change in the trading prices of a partys capital stock,
by itself, be considered material or constitute a Material
Adverse Effect.
A-6
(b) Acquiror is a bank holding company registered under the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the BHC
Act). True and complete copies of the Acquirors
Charter and Bylaws, as in effect as of the date of this
Agreement, have previously been made available by Acquiror to
Target.
(c) Each Acquiror Subsidiary (i) is duly organized and
validly existing under the laws of its jurisdiction of
organization, (ii) is duly qualified to do business and in
good standing in all jurisdictions (whether federal, state,
local or foreign) where its ownership or leasing of property or
the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified and
in which the failure to be so qualified would have a Material
Adverse Effect on Acquiror and (iii) has all requisite
corporate or other power and authority to own or lease its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as now
conducted, except to the extent that the failure to have such
power or authority will not result in a Material Adverse Effect
on Acquiror. As used in this Agreement, the word
Subsidiary when used with respect to any
party means any bank, savings bank, corporation, partnership,
limited liability company, or other organization, whether
incorporated or unincorporated, which is consolidated with such
party for financial reporting purposes under GAAP.
3.2 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Acquiror consists of
ninety million (90,000,000) shares of Acquiror Common Stock, of
which, as of June 30, 2007, 15,545,581 shares were
issued and outstanding, and ten million (10,000,000) shares of
preferred stock, no par value per share (together with the
Acquiror Common Stock, the Acquiror Capital
Stock), of which, as of June 30, 2007, no shares
were issued and outstanding. As of the date hereof, no shares of
Acquiror Capital Stock were reserved for issuance except for
1,809,747 shares of Acquiror Common Stock reserved for
issuance upon the exercise of options to purchase shares of
Acquiror Common Stock (each a Acquiror Stock
Option) pursuant to the equity-based compensation
plans of Acquiror (the Acquiror Stock Plans)
as identified in Section 3.2(a) of the Acquiror
Disclosure Schedule and 395,000 shares reserved for
issuance pursuant to outstanding warrants of Acquiror
(Acquiror Warrants). All of the issued and
outstanding shares of Acquiror Capital Stock have been duly
authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable
and free of preemptive rights, with no personal liability
attaching to the ownership thereof. All of the Acquiror Stock
Plans have been approved by the Acquirors shareholders in
accordance with the requirements of the TBCA and the Code.
(b) No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness
having the right to vote on any matters on which shareholders
may vote (Voting Debt) of Acquiror are issued
or outstanding. Since June 30, 2007, Acquiror has not
issued any shares of Acquiror Capital Stock or any securities
convertible into or exercisable for any shares of Acquiror
Capital Stock, other than as would be permitted by
Section 5.3(a) hereof.
(c) Except for (i) this Agreement, (ii) the
rights under the Acquiror Warrants and the Acquiror Stock Plans
which represented, as of June 30, 2007, the right to
acquire up to an aggregate of 2,204,747 shares of Acquiror
Common Stock, and (iii) agreements entered into and
securities and other instruments issued after the date of this
Agreement as permitted by Section 5.3(a), there are
no options, subscriptions, warrants, calls, rights, commitments
or agreements of any character to which Acquiror or any its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which it or any its Subsidiaries
is bound obligating Acquiror or any its Subsidiaries to issue,
deliver or sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold,
additional shares of Acquiror Capital Stock or any Voting Debt
or stock appreciation rights of Acquiror or any its Subsidiaries
or obligating Acquiror or any its Subsidiaries, to extend or
enter into any such option, subscription, warrant, call, right,
commitment or agreement. Except as set forth in
Section 3.2(c) of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule,
there are no outstanding contractual obligations of Acquiror or
any its Subsidiaries (A) to repurchase, redeem or otherwise
acquire any shares of Acquiror Capital Stock or any capital
stock of its Subsidiaries or (B) pursuant to which Acquiror
or any of its Subsidiaries is or could be required to register
shares of Acquiror Capital Stock or other securities under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), except with respect to the Acquiror Warrants and
any such contractual obligations entered into after the date
hereof as permitted by Section 5.3(a).
(d) Except as set forth in Section 3.2(d) of
the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, Acquiror owns, directly or
indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital
stock or other equity ownership interests of each of its
Subsidiaries, free and clear of any liens, pledges, charges,
encumbrances and security interests whatsoever
(Liens), and all of such shares or equity
ownership interests are duly authorized and validly
A-7
issued and are fully paid, nonassessable (subject to
12 U.S.C. § 55) and free of preemptive
rights, with no personal liability attaching to the ownership
thereof. No Subsidiary of Acquiror has or is bound by any
outstanding subscription, option, warrant, call, commitment or
agreement of any character calling for the purchase or issuance
of any shares of capital stock or any other equity security of
such Subsidiary or any securities representing the right to
purchase or otherwise receive any shares of capital stock or any
other equity security of such Subsidiary.
3.3 Authority; No Violation.
(a) Acquiror has full corporate power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement and, subject in the case of
the consummation of the Merger to the adoption of this Agreement
by the requisite vote of the holders of Acquiror Common Stock,
to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of
the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly
approved by the Board of Directors of Acquiror. The Board of
Directors of Acquiror determined that the Merger is advisable
and in the best interest of Acquiror and its shareholders and
has directed that this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby be submitted to Acquirors shareholders
for adoption at a meeting of such shareholders and, except for
the adoption of this Agreement by the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Acquiror
Common Stock, no other corporate proceedings on the part of
Acquiror are necessary to approve this Agreement and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement
has been duly and validly executed and delivered by Acquiror and
(assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by Target)
constitutes valid and binding obligations of Acquiror,
enforceable against Acquiror in accordance with its terms
(except as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium,
reorganization or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors
generally and the availability of equitable remedies).
(b) Neither the execution and delivery by Acquiror of this
Agreement nor the consummation by Acquiror of the transactions
contemplated hereby, nor compliance by Acquiror with any of the
terms or provisions hereof, will (i) violate any provision
of the Acquirors Charter or Bylaws or (ii) assuming
that the consents and approvals referred to in
Section 3.4 are duly obtained, (x) violate any
statute, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, judgment, order,
writ, decree or injunction applicable to Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties or assets or
(y) violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any
provision of or the loss of any benefit under, constitute a
default (or an event which, with notice or lapse of time, or
both, would constitute a default) under, result in the
termination of or a right of termination or cancellation under,
accelerate the performance required by, or result in the
creation of any Lien upon any of the respective properties or
assets of Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries under, any of the
terms, conditions or provisions of any note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, deed of trust, license, lease, agreement or other
instrument or obligation to which Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party, or by which they or any of their
respective properties or assets may be bound or affected, except
(in the case of clause (ii) above) for such violations,
conflicts, breaches or defaults which, either individually or in
the aggregate, will not have a Material Adverse Effect on
Acquiror.
3.4 Consents and Approvals. Except for
(i) the filing of applications and notices, as applicable,
with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
Federal Reserve Board) under the BHC Act and
the Federal Reserve Act, as amended, and approval of such
applications and notices, (ii) the filing of any required
applications or notices with any other federal, state or foreign
agencies or regulatory authorities and approval of such
applications and notices (the Other Regulatory
Approvals), (iii) the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) of a Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus in definitive form relating to the
meeting of Targets and Acquirors shareholders to be
held in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby (the Joint Proxy
Statement), and of the registration statement on
Form S-4
(the
Form S-4)
in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a
prospectus, and declaration of effectiveness of the
Form S-4,
(iv) the filing of the Articles of Merger with the
Tennessee Secretary pursuant to the TBCA, (v) any notice or
filings under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the HSR
Act), (vi) any consents, authorizations,
approvals, filings or exemptions in connection with compliance
with the applicable provisions of federal and state securities
laws relating to the regulation of broker-dealers, investment
advisers or transfer agents, and the rules of NASDAQ, or which
are required under
A-8
insurance, mortgage banking and other similar laws,
(vii) such filings and approvals as are required to be made
or obtained under the securities or Blue Sky laws of
various states in connection with the issuance of the shares of
Acquiror Common Stock pursuant to this Agreement and
(viii) the approval of this Agreement by the requisite vote
of the shareholders of Acquiror and Target, no consents or
approvals of or filings or registrations with any court,
administrative agency or commission or other governmental
authority or instrumentality (each a Governmental
Entity) are necessary in connection with (A) the
execution and delivery by Acquiror of this Agreement and
(B) the consummation by Acquiror of the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby. Except for any consents,
authorizations, or approvals of any other material contracts to
which Acquiror is a party and which are listed in
Section 3.4 of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, no
consents, authorizations, or approvals of any other person are
necessary in connection with (A) the execution and delivery
by Acquiror of this Agreement and (B) the consummation by
Acquiror of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby.
3.5 Reports. Acquiror and each of its
Subsidiaries have timely filed all reports, registrations and
statements, together with any amendments required to be made
with respect thereto, that they were required to file since
January 1, 2002 with (i) the Federal Reserve Board,
(ii) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
(iii) any state regulatory authority (each a State
Regulator), (iv) the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (the OCC), or (v) the SEC,
(collectively Regulatory Agencies), and all
other reports and statements required to be filed by them since
January 1, 2002, including, without limitation, any report
or statement required to be filed pursuant to the laws, rules or
regulations of the United States, any state, or any Regulatory
Agency, and have paid all fees and assessments due and payable
in connection therewith, except where the failure to file such
report, registration or statement or to pay such fees and
assessments, either individually or in the aggregate, will not
have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror. Except for normal
examinations conducted by a Regulatory Agency in the ordinary
course of the business of Acquiror and its Subsidiaries, no
Regulatory Agency has initiated any proceeding or, to the
knowledge of Acquiror, investigation into the business or
operations of Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries since
January 1, 2002, except where such proceedings or
investigation will not, either individually or in the aggregate,
have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror. There is no
unresolved violation, criticism, or exception by any Regulatory
Agency with respect to any report or statement (written or oral)
relating to any examinations of Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries which, either individually or in the aggregate,
could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect
on Acquiror.
3.6 Financial Statements. Acquiror has
previously made available to Target true and correct copies of
(i) the consolidated balance sheets of Acquiror and its
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2006 and the
related consolidated statements of income and changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2004 through 2006, inclusive as reported
in Acquirors Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the
SEC under the Exchange Act and accompanied by the audit report
of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accountants with
respect to Acquiror, and (ii) the unaudited consolidated
balance sheet of Acquiror and its Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and June 30, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders
equity and cash flows for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2007, as reported in
Acquirors Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Acquiror
Form 10-Q).
The financial statements referred to in this
Section 3.6 (including the related notes, where
applicable) fairly present in all material respects the
consolidated results of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, cash flows and financial position of
Acquiror and its Subsidiaries for the respective fiscal periods
or as of the respective dates therein set forth, subject to
normal year-end audit adjustments in the case of unaudited
statements; each of such statements (including the related
notes, where applicable) complies in all material respects with
applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules
and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto; and each of
such statements (including the related notes, where applicable)
has been prepared in all material respects in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) consistently applied during the
periods involved, except, in each case, as indicated in such
statements or in the notes thereto. The books and records of
Acquiror and its Subsidiaries have been, and are being,
maintained in all material respects in accordance with GAAP and
any other applicable legal and accounting requirements and
reflect only actual transactions.
A-9
3.7 Brokers Fees. Except for
Sandler, ONeill & Partners, L.P., neither
Acquiror nor any Acquiror Subsidiary nor any of their respective
officers or directors has employed any broker or finder or
incurred any liability for any brokers fees, commissions
or finders fees in connection with the Merger or related
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
3.8 Absence of Certain Changes or Events.
(a) Since June 30, 2007, no event or events have
occurred that have had or are reasonably likely to have, either
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on
Acquiror.
(b) Since June 30, 2007, through and including the
date of this Agreement, Acquiror and its Subsidiaries have
carried on their respective businesses in all material respects
in the ordinary course.
3.9 Legal Proceedings.
(a) Except as disclosed in Section 3.9(a) of
the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, neither Acquiror nor any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to any, and there are no pending or,
to the best of Acquirors knowledge, threatened, legal,
administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims, actions
or governmental or regulatory investigations of any nature
against Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries or challenging the
validity or propriety of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement as to which, in any such case, there is a reasonable
probability of an adverse determination and which, if adversely
determined, will be reasonably likely to, either individually or
in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror.
(b) There is no injunction, order, judgment, decree, or
regulatory restriction (other than those that apply to similarly
situated bank holding companies or banks) imposed upon Acquiror,
any of its Subsidiaries or the assets of Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries that has had, or will have, either individually or
in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror.
3.10 Taxes and Tax Returns.
(a) Each of Acquiror and its Subsidiaries has duly filed
all federal, state, foreign and local information returns and
Tax returns required to be filed by it on or prior to the date
of this Agreement (all such returns being accurate and complete
in all material respects) and has duly paid or made provision
for the payment of all Taxes that have been incurred or are due
or claimed to be due from it by federal, state, foreign or local
taxing authorities other than (i) Taxes or other
governmental charges that are not yet delinquent or are being
contested in good faith or have not been finally determined and
have been adequately reserved against under GAAP, or
(ii) information returns, Tax returns or Taxes as to which
the failure to file, pay or make provision for is not reasonably
likely to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror. The federal income Tax
returns of Acquiror and its Subsidiaries to the knowledge of
Acquiror have not been examined by the IRS. There are no
material disputes pending, or to the knowledge of Acquiror,
claims asserted, for Taxes or assessments upon Acquiror or any
of its Subsidiaries for which Acquiror does not have reserves
that are adequate under GAAP. Neither Acquiror nor any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to or is bound by any Tax sharing,
allocation or indemnification agreement or arrangement (other
than such an agreement or arrangement exclusively between or
among Acquiror and its Subsidiaries). Within the past five
years, neither Acquiror nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a
distributing corporation or a controlled
corporation in a distribution intended to qualify under
Section 355(a) of the Code. Acquiror has no liability for
Taxes of any person arising from the application of Treasury
Regulation
section 1.1502-6
or any analogous provision of state, local or foreign law, or as
a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise. No closing
agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code (or any
similar provision of state, local or foreign law) has been
entered into by or with respect to Acquiror. All Taxes required
to be withheld, collected or deposited by or with respect to
Acquiror have been timely withheld, collected or deposited as
the case may be, and to the extent required, have been paid to
the relevant taxing authority, except for failures to so
withhold, collect or deposit that are immaterial, individually
and in the aggregate. Acquiror has not been requested to grant,
or has granted, any waiver of any federal, state, local or
foreign statute of limitations with respect to, or any extension
of a period for the assessment of, any Tax, which waiver or
extension has not since expired. Acquiror has not participated
in any listed transaction or reportable
transaction or tax shelter within the meaning
of the Code requiring it to file, register, prepare, produce or
maintain any disclosure, report, list or
A-10
any other statement or document under Sections 6111 or 6112
of the Code. Acquiror is not aware of any fact or circumstance
that could reasonably be expected to prevent the Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Except as set forth on
Section 3.10(a) of the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule,
neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will cause
the imposition on Acquiror of any excise tax or penalty under
Section 4999 of the Code or result in payment of any
non-deductible parachute payment within the meaning
of Section 280G of the Code.
(b) As used in this Agreement, the term
Tax or Taxes means
(i) all federal, state, local, and foreign income, excise,
gross receipts, gross income, ad valorem, profits, gains,
property, capital, sales, transfer, use, payroll, employment,
severance, withholding, duties, intangibles, franchise, backup
withholding, and other taxes, charges, levies or like
assessments together with all penalties and additions to tax and
interest thereon and (ii) any liability for Taxes described
in clause (i) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any similar provision of state, local or foreign law).
3.11 Employees.
(a) Section 3.11(a) of the Acquiror Disclosure
Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of each material
benefit or compensation plan, arrangement or agreement, and any
material bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, vacation,
stock purchase, stock option, severance, employment, change of
control or fringe benefit plan, program or agreement that is
maintained, or contributed to, for the benefit of current or
former directors or employees of Acquiror and its Subsidiaries
or with respect to which Acquiror or its Subsidiaries may,
directly or indirectly, have any liability to such directors or
employees, as of the date of this Agreement (the
Acquiror Benefit Plans).
(b) Acquiror has heretofore made available to Target true
and complete copies of each of the Acquiror Benefit Plans and
certain related documents, including, but not limited to,
(i) the actuarial report for such Acquiror Benefit Plan (if
applicable) for each of the last two years, and (ii) the
most recent determination letter or opinion letter (upon which
Acquiror is permitted to rely) from the IRS (if applicable) for
such Acquiror Benefit Plan.
(c) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect on Acquiror, (i) each of the Acquiror Benefit Plans
has been operated and administered in all material respects in
compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended (ERISA) and the Code,
(ii) each of the Acquiror Benefit Plans intended to be
qualified within the meaning of Section 401(a)
of the Code and has received a favorable determination letter or
opinion letter (upon which Acquiror is entitled to rely) from
the IRS that such Acquiror Benefit Plan is so qualified, and to
the knowledge of Acquiror, there are no existing circumstances
or any events that have occurred that will adversely affect the
qualified status of any such Acquiror Benefit Plan,
(iii) with respect to each Acquiror Benefit Plan which is
subject to Title IV of ERISA, the present value of accrued
benefits under such Acquiror Benefit Plan, based upon the
actuarial assumptions used for funding purposes in the most
recent actuarial report prepared by such Acquiror Benefit
Plans actuary with respect to such Acquiror Benefit Plan,
did not, as of its latest valuation date, exceed the then
current value of the assets of such Acquiror Benefit Plan
allocable to such accrued benefits, (iv) no Acquiror
Benefit Plan provides benefits, including, without limitation,
death or medical benefits (whether or not insured), with respect
to current or former employees or directors of Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries beyond their retirement or other termination of
service, other than (A) coverage mandated by applicable
law, (B) death benefits or retirement benefits under any
employee pension plan (as such term is defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA), (C) deferred compensation
benefits accrued as liabilities on the books of Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries or (D) benefits the full cost of which is
borne by the current or former employee or director (or his
beneficiary), (v) no material liability under Title IV
of ERISA has been incurred by Acquiror, its Subsidiaries or any
trade or business, whether or not incorporated, all of which
together with Acquiror, would be deemed a single
employer under Section 4001 of ERISA (a
Acquiror ERISA Affiliate) that has not been
satisfied in full, and, to the knowledge of Acquiror, no
condition exists that presents a material risk to Acquiror, its
Subsidiaries or any Acquiror ERISA Affiliate of incurring a
material liability thereunder, (vi) no Acquiror Benefit
Plan is a multiemployer pension plan (as
A-11
such term is defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA),
(vii) all contributions due and payable by Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries as of the Effective Time with respect to each
Acquiror Benefit Plan in respect of current or prior plan years
have been paid or accrued in accordance with GAAP,
(viii) none of Acquiror, its Subsidiaries or any other
person, including any fiduciary, has engaged in a transaction in
connection with which Acquiror, its Subsidiaries or any Acquiror
Benefit Plan will be subject to either a material civil penalty
assessed pursuant to Section 409 or 502(i) of ERISA or a
material Tax imposed pursuant to Section 4975 or 4976 of
the Code, and (ix) to the knowledge of Acquiror there are
no pending, threatened or anticipated claims (other than routine
claims for benefits) by, on behalf of or against any of the
Acquiror Benefit Plans or any trusts related thereto.
(d) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement
nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
will (either alone or in conjunction with any other event)
(i) result (either alone or upon the occurrence of any
additional acts or events) in any payment (including, without
limitation, severance, unemployment compensation, excess
parachute payment (within the meaning of Section 280G
of the Code), forgiveness of indebtedness or otherwise) becoming
due to any current director or employee of Acquiror or any of
its affiliates from Acquiror or any of its affiliates under any
Acquiror Benefit Plan or otherwise, (ii) increase any
benefits otherwise payable under any Acquiror Benefit Plan or
(iii) result in any acceleration of the time of payment or
vesting of any such benefits that will, either individually or
in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror.
(e) Each Acquiror Benefit Plan that is a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan (within the meaning of
Section 409A(d)(1) of the Code) has been operated in good
faith compliance with Section 409A of the Code, IRS Notice
2005-1,
Treasury Regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code,
and any subsequent guidance relating thereto, and no additional
tax under Section 409A(a)(1)(B) of the Code has been or is
reasonably expected to be incurred by a participant in any such
Acquiror Benefit Plan, and no employee of the Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries is entitled to any
gross-up or
otherwise entitled to indemnification by the Acquiror, any
Subsidiary of the Acquiror or any Acquiror ERISA Affiliate for
any violation of Section 409A of the Code.
3.12 SEC Reports. Acquiror has previously
made available to Target an accurate and complete copy of each
(a) final registration statement, prospectus, report,
schedule and definitive proxy statement filed since
January 1, 2002 by Acquiror with the SEC pursuant to the
Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), and prior to the
date hereof and (b) communication mailed by Acquiror to its
shareholders since January 1, 2002. Acquiror has filed all
required reports, schedules, registration statements and other
documents with the SEC since January 1, 2002 (the
Acquiror Reports). As of their respective
dates of filing with the SEC (or, if amended or superseded by a
filing prior to the date hereof, as of the date of such filing),
the Acquiror Reports complied in all material respects with the
requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the
case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder
applicable to such Acquiror Reports, and none of the Acquiror
Reports when filed contained any untrue statement of a material
fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
3.13 Compliance with Applicable Law.
(a) Acquiror and each of its Subsidiaries hold all material
licenses, franchises, permits, patents, trademarks and
authorizations necessary for the lawful conduct of their
respective businesses under and pursuant to each, and have
complied in all material respects with and are not in default in
any material respect under any, applicable law, statute, order,
rule, regulation, policy, agreement
and/or
guideline of any Governmental Entity relating to Acquiror or any
of its Subsidiaries, except where the failure to hold such
license, franchise, permit or authorization or such
noncompliance or default will not, either individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror.
(b) Except as will not have, either individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror, Acquiror and
each of its Subsidiaries have properly administered all accounts
for which it acts as a fiduciary, including accounts for which
it serves as a trustee, agent, custodian, personal
representative, guardian, conservator or investment advisor, in
accordance with the terms of the governing documents,
A-12
applicable state and federal law and regulation and common law.
None of Acquiror, any of its Subsidiaries, or any director,
officer or employee of Acquiror or of any of its Subsidiaries,
has committed any breach of trust with respect to any such
fiduciary account that will have a Material Adverse Effect on
Acquiror, and the accountings for each such fiduciary account
are true and correct in all material respects and accurately
reflect the assets of such fiduciary account.
3.14 Certain Contracts.
(a) Except as disclosed in Section 3.11(a) of
the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, neither Acquiror nor any of
its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any contract,
arrangement, commitment or understanding (whether written or
oral) (i) with respect to the employment of any directors,
officers or employees other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, (ii) which, upon
the consummation or shareholder approval of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will (either alone or upon the
occurrence of any additional acts or events) result in any
payment (whether of severance pay or otherwise) becoming due
from Acquiror, Target, the Surviving Corporation, or any of
their respective Subsidiaries to any officer or employee
thereof, (iii) which is a material contract (as
such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC) to be performed after the date of this Agreement
that has not been filed or incorporated by reference in the
Acquiror Reports, (iv) which materially restricts the
conduct of any line of business by Acquiror or upon consummation
of the Merger will materially restrict the ability of the
Surviving Corporation to engage in any line of business in which
a bank holding company may lawfully engage, (v) with or to
a labor union or guild (including any collective bargaining
agreement) or (vi) (including any stock option plan, stock
appreciation rights plan, restricted stock plan or stock
purchase plan) any of the benefits of which will be increased,
or the vesting of the benefits of which will be accelerated, by
the occurrence of any shareholder approval or the consummation
of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or
the value of any of the benefits of which will be calculated on
the basis of any of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Each contract, arrangement, commitment or
understanding of the type described in this
Section 3.14(a), whether or not set forth in the
Acquiror Disclosure Schedule, is referred to herein as a
Acquiror Contract, and neither Acquiror nor
any of its Subsidiaries knows of, or has received notice of, any
violation of the above by any of the other parties thereto which
will have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect on Acquiror.
(b) (i) Each Acquiror Contract is valid and binding on
Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, and in full
force and effect, (ii) Acquiror and each of its
Subsidiaries has in all material respects performed all
obligations required to be performed by it to date under each
Acquiror Contract, except where such noncompliance, either
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a Material
Adverse Effect on Acquiror, and (iii) no event or condition
exists which constitutes or, after notice or lapse of time or
both, will constitute, a material default on the part of
Acquiror or any of its Subsidiaries under any such Acquiror
Contract, except where such default will not, either
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect
on Acquiror.
3.15 Agreements with Regulatory
Agencies. Neither Acquiror nor any of its
Subsidiaries is subject to any
cease-and-desist
or other order issued by, or is a party to any written
agreement, consent agreement or memorandum of understanding
with, or is a party to any commitment letter or similar
undertaking to, or is subject to any order or directive by, or
has been since January 1, 2002, a recipient of any
supervisory letter from, or since January 1, 2002, has
adopted any board resolutions at the request of, any Regulatory
Agency or other Governmental Entity that currently restricts in
any material respect the conduct of its business, would restrict
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, or that in any material manner relates to its capital
adequacy, its credit policies, its management or its business
(each, whether or not set forth in the Acquiror Disclosure
Schedule, a Acquiror Regulatory Agreement),
nor to the knowledge of Acquiror has Acquiror or any of its
Subsidiaries been advised since January 1, 2002, by any
Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity that it is
considering issuing or requesting any such Acquiror Regulatory
Agreement.
3.16 Interest Rate Risk Management
Instruments. Except as would not be reasonably
likely to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror, (a) all interest rate
swaps, caps,
A-13
floors and option agreements and other interest rate risk
management arrangements, whether entered into for the account of
Acquiror or for the account of a customer of Acquiror or one of
its Subsidiaries, were entered into in the ordinary course of
business and, to Acquirors knowledge, in accordance with
prudent banking practice and applicable rules, regulations and
policies of any Regulatory Authority and with counterparties
believed to be financially responsible at the time, and are
legal, valid and binding obligations of Acquiror or one of its
Subsidiaries enforceable in accordance with their terms (except
as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium,
reorganization or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors
generally and the availability of equitable remedies), and are
in full force and effect; (b) Acquiror and each of its
Subsidiaries have duly performed in all material respects all of
their material obligations thereunder to the extent that such
obligations to perform have accrued; and (c) to
Acquirors knowledge, there are no material breaches,
violations or defaults or allegations or assertions of such by
any party thereunder.
3.17 Undisclosed Liabilities. Except for
those liabilities that are fully reflected or reserved against
on the consolidated balance sheet of Acquiror included in the
Acquiror
Form 10-Q
and for liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice since June 30, 2007, neither
Acquiror nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any liability
of any nature whatsoever (whether absolute, accrued, contingent
or otherwise and whether due or to become due) that, either
individually or in the aggregate, has had or will have, a
Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror.
3.18 Insurance. Acquiror and its
Subsidiaries have in effect insurance coverage with reputable
insurers or are self-insured, which in respect of amounts,
premiums, types and risks insured, constitutes reasonably
adequate coverage against all risks insured against by bank
holding companies comparable in size and operations to Acquiror
and its Subsidiaries.
3.19 Environmental Liability. There are
no legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims,
actions, causes of action, private environmental investigations
or remediation activities or governmental investigations of any
nature seeking to impose, or that could reasonably result in the
imposition, on Acquiror of any liability or obligation arising
under common law or under any local, state or federal
environmental statute, regulation or ordinance including,
without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended
(CERCLA), pending or, to the knowledge of
Acquiror, threatened against Acquiror, which liability or
obligation will, either individually or in the aggregate, have a
Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror. To the knowledge of
Acquiror, there is no reasonable basis for any such proceeding,
claim, action or governmental investigation that would impose
any liability or obligation that will, individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror. Acquiror
is not subject to any agreement, order, judgment, decree, letter
or memorandum by or with any court, governmental authority,
regulatory agency or third party imposing any liability or
obligation with respect to the foregoing that will have, either
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on
Acquiror.
3.20 State Takeover Laws. The Board of
Directors of Acquiror has approved the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement for purposes of
Sections 48-103-101
through
48-103-505
of the TBCA, if applicable to Acquiror, such that the provisions
of such sections of the TBCA will not apply to this Agreement or
any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
3.21 Reorganization. As of the date of
this Agreement, Acquiror is not aware of any fact or
circumstance that would reasonably be expected to prevent the
Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
3.22 Information Supplied. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by Acquiror for inclusion
or incorporation by reference in (i) the
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading, and (ii) the Joint Proxy Statement will, at the
date of mailing to shareholders and at the times of the meetings
of shareholders to be held in connection with the Merger,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
Joint Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material
respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the
A-14
rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, except that no
representation or warranty is made by Acquiror with respect to
statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on
information supplied by Target for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in the Joint Proxy Statement.
3.23 Internal Controls. The records,
systems, controls, data and information of Acquiror and its
Subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated under
means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic
process, whether computerized or not) that are under the
exclusive ownership and direct control of Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries or accountants (including all means of access
thereto and therefrom), except for any non-exclusive ownership
and non-direct control that would not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the system of internal
accounting controls described in the following sentence. As and
to the extent described in the Acquiror Reports filed with the
SEC prior to the date hereof, Acquiror and its Subsidiaries have
devised and maintain a system of internal accounting controls
sufficient to provide reasonable assurances regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Acquiror
(i) has designed disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to Acquiror, including
its Subsidiaries, is made known to the management of Acquiror by
others within those entities, and (ii) has disclosed, based
on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to
Acquirors independent registered public accounting firm
and the audit committee of Acquirors Board of Directors
(x) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Acquirors ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and (y) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in Acquirors internal control over
financial reporting. Acquiror has made available to Target a
summary of any such disclosure made by management to
Acquirors auditors and audit committee since
January 1, 2004. To the knowledge of Acquiror, it is in
compliance in all material respects with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
3.24 Opinion of Acquiror Financial
Advisor. Acquiror has received the opinion of its
financial advisor, Sandler, ONeill & Partners,
L.P., dated the date of this Agreement, to the effect that the
Merger Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to
Acquiror.
ARTICLE IV.
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF TARGET
Except as disclosed in (a) the Target Reports (defined
below) filed with the SEC prior to the date hereof or
(b) the disclosure schedule (the Target Disclosure
Schedule) delivered by Target to Acquiror prior to the
execution of this Agreement (which schedule sets forth, among
other things, items the disclosure of which is necessary or
appropriate either in response to an express disclosure
requirement contained in a provision hereof or as an exception
to one or more representations or warranties contained in this
Article IV or to one or more of Targets
covenants contained in Article V, provided, however,
that, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, (i) no such item is required to be set forth in
such schedule as an exception to a representation or warranty if
its absence would not result in the related representation or
warranty being deemed untrue or incorrect under the standard
established by Section 9.2, and (ii) the mere
inclusion of an item in such schedule as an exception to a
representation or warranty shall not be deemed an admission that
such item represents a material exception or material fact,
event or circumstance or that such item has had or would be
reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect on Target),
Target hereby represents and warrants to Acquiror as follows:
4.1 Corporate Organization.
(a) Target is a corporation duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of
Tennessee. Target has the corporate power and authority to own
or lease all of its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as it is now being conducted, and is duly licensed or
qualified to do business in each jurisdiction in which the
nature of the business conducted by it or the character or
location of the properties and assets owned or leased by it
makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except where
the
A-15
failure to be so licensed or qualified would not, either
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect
on Target.
(b) Target is a bank holding company registered under the
BHC Act. True and complete copies of the Charter (the
Target Charter), and Bylaws of Target, as in
effect as of the date of this Agreement, have previously been
made available by Target to Acquiror.
(c) Each Target Subsidiary (i) is duly organized and
validly existing under the laws of its jurisdiction of
organization, (ii) is duly qualified to do business and in
good standing in all jurisdictions (whether federal, state,
local or foreign) where its ownership or leasing of property or
the conduct of its business requires it to be so qualified and
in which the failure to be so qualified would have a Material
Adverse Effect on Target, and (iii) has all requisite
corporate or other power and authority to own or lease its
properties and assets and to carry on its business as now
conducted except to the extent that the failure to have such
power or authority will not result in a Material Adverse Effect
on Target.
4.2 Capitalization.
(a) The authorized capital stock of Target consists of
Seventy Five Million (75,000,000) shares of Target Common Stock,
of which, as of June 30, 2007, 13,933,006 shares were
issued and outstanding, and Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares
of preferred stock, no par value per share (the Target
Preferred Stock and, together with the Target Common
Stock, the Target Capital Stock), of which,
as of June 30, 2007, no shares were issued and outstanding.
As of the date hereof, no shares of Target Capital Stock were
reserved for issuance except for shares of Target Common Stock
reserved for issuance upon the vesting of restricted shares and
the exercise of Target Stock Options, in each case, issued
pursuant to Targets equity compensation plans (the
Target Stock Plans). All of the issued and
outstanding shares of Target Capital Stock have been duly
authorized and validly issued and are fully paid, nonassessable
and free of preemptive rights, with no personal liability
attaching to the ownership thereof. Except as set forth in
Section 4.2(a) of the Target Disclosure Schedule,
all of the Target Stock Plans have been approved by the
Targets shareholders in accordance with the requirements
of the TBCA and the Code.
(b) No Voting Debt of Target is issued or outstanding.
Since June 30, 2007, Target has not issued any shares of
Target Capital Stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable for any shares of Target Capital Stock, other than
as would be permitted by Section 5.2(b) hereof.
(c) Except for (i) this Agreement, (ii) the
rights under the Target Stock Plans which represented, as of
June 30, 2007, the right to acquire up to an aggregate of
1,464,479 shares of Target Common Stock, and
(iii) agreements entered into and securities and other
instruments issued after the date of this Agreement as permitted
by Section 5.2(b), there are no options,
subscriptions, warrants, calls, rights, commitments or
agreements of any character to which Target or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party or by which it or any of its
Subsidiaries is bound obligating Target or any of its
Subsidiaries to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be issued,
delivered or sold, additional shares of Target Capital Stock or
any Voting Debt or stock appreciation rights of Target or any of
its Subsidiaries or obligating Target or any of its
Subsidiaries, to extend or enter into any such option,
subscription, warrant, call, right, commitment or agreement.
There are no outstanding contractual obligations of Target or
any of its Subsidiaries (A) to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any shares of Target Capital Stock or any
capital stock of its Subsidiaries or (B) pursuant to which
Target or any of its Subsidiaries is or could be required to
register shares of Target Capital Stock or other securities
under the Securities Act, except any such contractual
obligations entered into after the date hereof as permitted by
Section 5.2(b).
(d) Target owns, directly or indirectly, all of the issued
and outstanding shares of capital stock or other equity
ownership interests of each of its Subsidiaries, free and clear
of any Liens, and all of such shares or equity ownership
interests are duly authorized and validly issued and are fully
paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights, with no
personal liability attaching to the ownership thereof. No
Subsidiary of Target has or is bound by any outstanding
subscription, option, warrant, call, commitment or agreement of
any character calling for the purchase or issuance of any shares
of capital stock or any other equity security of such
A-16
Subsidiary or any securities representing the right to purchase
or otherwise receive any shares of capital stock or any other
equity security of such Subsidiary.
4.3 Authority; No Violation.
(a) Target has full corporate power and authority to
execute and deliver this Agreement and, subject in the case of
the consummation of the Merger to the adoption of this Agreement
by the requisite vote of the holders of Target Common Stock, to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution
and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby have been duly and validly
approved by the Board of Directors of Target. The Board of
Directors of Target determined that the Merger is advisable and
in the best interest of Target and its shareholders and has
directed that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby be submitted to Targets shareholders for adoption
at a meeting of such shareholders and, except for the adoption
of this Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of Target Common Stock, no
other corporate proceedings on the part of Target are necessary
to approve this Agreement and to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly
executed and delivered by Target and (assuming due
authorization, execution and delivery by Acquiror) constitutes
valid and binding obligations of Target, enforceable against
Target in accordance with its terms (except as may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization or similar
laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the
availability of equitable remedies).
(b) Except as set forth in Section 4.3(b) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by Target, nor the consummation by
Target of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor compliance
by Target with any of the terms or provisions hereof, will
(i) violate any provision of the Target Charter or the
Bylaws of Target or the charter or bylaws of any Target
Subsidiary, or (ii) assuming that the consents and
approvals referred to in Section 4.4 are duly
obtained, (x) violate any statute, code, ordinance, rule,
regulation, judgment, order, writ, decree or injunction
applicable to Target or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective properties or assets or (y) violate, conflict
with, result in a breach of any provision of or the loss of any
benefit under, constitute a default (or an event which, with
notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a default)
under, result in the termination of or a right of termination or
cancellation under, accelerate the performance required by, or
result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the respective
properties or assets of Target or any of its Subsidiaries under,
any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any note, bond,
mortgage, indenture, deed of trust, license, lease, agreement or
other instrument or obligation to which Target or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party, or by which they or any of their
respective properties or assets may be bound or affected, except
(in the case of clause (ii) above) for such violations,
conflicts, breaches or defaults which either individually or in
the aggregate will not have a Material Adverse Effect on Target.
4.4 Consents and Approvals. Except for
(i) the filing of applications and notices, as applicable,
with the Federal Reserve Board under the BHC Act and the Federal
Reserve Act, as amended, and approval of such applications and
notices, (ii) the Other Regulatory Approvals,
(iii) the filing with the SEC of the Joint Proxy Statement
and the
Form S-4
and declaration of effectiveness of the
Form S-4,
(iv) the filing of the Articles of Merger with the
Tennessee Secretary pursuant to the TBCA, (v) any notice or
filings under the HSR Act, (vi) any consents,
authorizations, approvals, filings or exemptions in connection
with compliance with the applicable provisions of federal and
state securities laws relating to the regulation of
broker-dealers, investment advisers or transfer agents, and the
rules of NASD, or which are required under consumer finance,
mortgage banking and other similar laws, and (vii) the
approval of this Agreement by the requisite vote of the
shareholders of Target and Acquiror, no consents or approvals of
or filings or registrations with any Governmental Entity are
necessary in connection with (A) the execution and delivery
by Target of this Agreement and (B) the consummation by
Target of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby. Except for any consents, authorizations, or approvals of
any other material contracts to which Target is a party and
which are listed in Section 4.4 of the Target
Disclosure Schedule, no consents, authorizations, or approvals
of any other person are necessary in connection with
(A) the execution and delivery by Target of this Agreement
and (B) the consummation by Target of the Merger and the
other transactions contemplated hereby.
A-17
4.5 Reports. Target and each of its
Subsidiaries have timely filed all reports, registrations and
statements, together with any amendments required to be made
with respect thereto, that they were required to file since
January 1, 2002 with the Regulatory Agencies, and all other
reports and statements required to be filed by them since
January 1, 2002, including, without limitation, any report
or statement required to be filed pursuant to the laws, rules or
regulations of the United States, any state, or any Regulatory
Agency, and have paid all fees and assessments due and payable
in connection therewith, except where the failure to file such
report, registration or statement or to pay such fees and
assessments, either individually or in the aggregate, will not
have a Material Adverse Effect on Target. Except for normal
examinations conducted by a Regulatory Agency in the ordinary
course of the business of Target and its Subsidiaries, no
Regulatory Agency has initiated any proceeding or, to the
knowledge of Target, investigation into the business or
operations of Target or any of its Subsidiaries since
January 1, 2002, except where such proceedings or
investigation did not, or will not, either individually or in
the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Target. There
is no unresolved violation, criticism, or exception by any
Regulatory Agency with respect to any report or statement
(written or oral) relating to any examinations of Target or any
of its Subsidiaries which, could reasonably be expected to,
either individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect on Target.
4.6 Financial Statements. Target has
previously made available to Acquiror true and correct copies of
(i) the consolidated balance sheet of Target and its
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2004 through 2006, inclusive as reported
in Targets Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the
SEC under the Exchange Act and accompanied by the audit report
of Maggart & Associates, P.C., independent
registered public accountants with respect to Target, and
(ii) the unaudited consolidated balance sheets of Target
and its Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and
June 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and
June 30, 2007, as reported in Targets Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the
Target
Form 10-Q).
The financial statements referred to in this
Section 4.6 (including the related notes, where
applicable) fairly present in all material respects the
consolidated results of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, cash flows and financial position of
Target and its Subsidiaries for the respective fiscal periods or
as of the respective dates therein set forth, subject to normal
year-end audit adjustments in the case of unaudited statements;
each of such statements (including the related notes, where
applicable) complies in all material respects with applicable
accounting requirements and with the published rules and
regulations of the SEC with respect thereto; and each of such
statements (including the related notes, where applicable) has
been prepared in all material respects in accordance with GAAP
consistently applied during the periods involved, except in each
case as indicated in such statements or in the notes thereto.
The books and records of Target and its Subsidiaries have been,
and are being, maintained in all material respects in accordance
with GAAP and any other applicable legal and accounting
requirements and reflect only actual transactions.
4.7 Brokers Fees. Except for Hovde
Financial LLC, neither Target nor any Target Subsidiary nor any
of their respective officers or directors has employed any
broker or finder or incurred any liability for any brokers
fees, commissions or finders fees in connection with the
Merger or related transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
4.8 Absence of Certain Changes or Events.
(a) Since June 30, 2007, no event or events have
occurred that have had or are reasonably likely to have, either
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on
Target.
(b) Except as set forth in Section 4.8(b) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule, since June 30, 2007 through
and including the date of this Agreement, Target and its
Subsidiaries have carried on their respective businesses in all
material respects in the ordinary course.
4.9 Legal Proceedings.
(a) Except as disclosed in Section 4.9(a) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither Target nor any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to any, and there are no pending or, to
the best of Targets knowledge, threatened legal,
A-18
administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims, actions
or governmental or regulatory investigations of any nature
against Target or any of its Subsidiaries or challenging the
validity or propriety of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement as to which, in any such case, there is a reasonable
probability of an adverse determination and which, if adversely
determined, will be reasonably likely to, either individually or
in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Target.
(b) There is no injunction, order, judgment, decree, or
regulatory restriction (other than those that apply to similarly
situated bank holding companies or banks) imposed upon Target,
any of its Subsidiaries or the assets of Target or any of its
Subsidiaries that has had or will have, either individually or
in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Target.
4.10 Taxes and Tax Returns. Each of
Target and its Subsidiaries has duly filed all federal, state,
foreign and local information returns and Tax returns required
to be filed by it on or prior to the date of this Agreement (all
such returns being accurate and complete in all material
respects) and has duly paid or made provision for the payment of
all Taxes that have been incurred or are due or claimed to be
due from it by federal, state, foreign or local taxing
authorities other than (i) Taxes or other governmental
charges that are not yet delinquent or are being contested in
good faith or have not been finally determined and have been
adequately reserved against under GAAP, or (ii) information
returns, Tax returns or Taxes as to which the failure to file,
pay or make provision for is not reasonably likely to have,
either individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect on Target. The federal income Tax returns of Target and
its Subsidiaries, to the knowledge of Target, have not been
examined by the IRS. There are no material disputes pending, or
to the knowledge of Target, claims asserted, for Taxes or
assessments upon Target or any of its Subsidiaries for which
Target does not have reserves that are adequate under GAAP.
Neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or is
bound by any Tax sharing, allocation or indemnification
agreement or arrangement (other than such an agreement or
arrangement exclusively between or among Target and its
Subsidiaries). Within the past five years, neither Target nor
any of its Subsidiaries has been a distributing
corporation or a controlled corporation in a
distribution intended to qualify under Section 355(a) of
the Code. Target has no liability for Taxes of any person
arising from the application of Treasury Regulation
section 1.1502-6
or any analogous provision of state, local or foreign law, or as
a transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise. No closing
agreement pursuant to Section 7121 of the Code (or any
similar provision of state, local or foreign law) has been
entered into by or with respect to Target. All Taxes required to
be withheld, collected or deposited by or with respect to Target
have been timely withheld, collected or deposited as the case
may be, and to the extent required, have been paid to the
relevant taxing authority, except for failures to so withhold,
collect or deposit that are immaterial, individually and in the
aggregate. Target has not been requested to grant, or has
granted, any waiver of any federal, state, local or foreign
statute of limitations with respect to, or any extension of a
period for the assessment of, any Tax, which waiver or extension
has not since expired. Target has not participated in any
listed transaction or reportable
transaction or tax shelter within the meaning
of the Code requiring it to file, register, prepare, produce or
maintain any disclosure, report, list or any other statement or
document under Sections 6111 or 6112 of the Code. Target is
not aware of any fact or circumstance that could reasonably be
expected to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. Except as set forth in Section 4.10 of the
Target Disclosure Schedule, neither the execution and delivery
of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby will cause the imposition of any excise tax
or penalty under Section 4999 of the Code or result in
payment of any non-deductible parachute payment
within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code.
4.11 Employees.
(a) Section 4.11(a) of the Target Disclosure
Schedule sets forth a true and complete list of each material
benefit or compensation plan, arrangement or agreement, and any
material bonus, incentive, deferred compensation, medical,
dental, life, vision, vacation, stock purchase, stock option,
severance, employment, change of control or fringe benefit plan,
program or agreement that is maintained, or contributed to, for
the benefit of current or former directors or employees of
Target and its Subsidiaries or with respect to which Target or
its Subsidiaries may, directly or indirectly, have any liability
to such directors or employees, as of the date of this Agreement
(the Target Benefit Plans).
A-19
(b) Target has heretofore made available to Acquiror true
and complete copies of each of the Target Benefit Plans and
certain related documents, including, but not limited to,
(i) the actuarial report for such Target Benefit Plan (if
applicable) for each of the last two years, and (ii) the
most recent determination letter or opinion letter (upon which
Target is permitted to rely) from the IRS (if applicable) for
such Target Benefit Plan.
(c) Except as identified in Section 4.11(a) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule referenced above or as would not
reasonably be expected to have, either individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Target, (i) each of
the Target Benefit Plans has been operated and administered in
all material respects in compliance with ERISA and the Code,
(ii) each of the Target Benefit Plans intended to be
qualified within the meaning of Section 401(a)
of the Code and has received a favorable determination letter or
opinion letter (upon which Target is permitted to rely) from the
IRS that such Target Benefit Plan is so qualified, and to the
knowledge of Target, there are no existing circumstances or any
events that have occurred that will adversely affect the
qualified status of any such Target Benefit Plan,
(iii) with respect to each Target Benefit Plan which is
subject to Title IV of ERISA, the present value of accrued
benefits under such Target Benefit Plan, based upon the
actuarial assumptions used for funding purposes in the most
recent actuarial report prepared by such Target Benefit
Plans actuary with respect to such Target Benefit Plan,
did not, as of its latest valuation date, exceed the then
current value of the assets of such Target Benefit Plan
allocable to such accrued benefits, (iv) no Target Benefit
Plan provides benefits, including, without limitation, death or
medical benefits (whether or not insured), with respect to
current or former employees or directors of Target or its
Subsidiaries beyond their retirement or other termination of
service, other than (A) coverage mandated by applicable
law, (B) death benefits or retirement benefits under any
employee pension plan (as such term is defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA), (C) deferred compensation
benefits accrued as liabilities on the books of Target or its
Subsidiaries or (D) benefits the full cost of which is
borne by the current or former employee or director (or his
beneficiary), (v) no material liability under Title IV
of ERISA has been incurred by Target, its Subsidiaries or any
trade or business, whether or not incorporated, all of which
together with Target, would be deemed a single
employer under Section 4001 of ERISA (a
Target ERISA Affiliate) that has not been
satisfied in full, and, to the knowledge of Target, no condition
exists that presents a material risk to Target, its Subsidiaries
or any Target ERISA Affiliate of incurring a material liability
thereunder, (vi) no Target Benefit Plan is a
multiemployer pension plan (as such term is defined
in Section 3(37) of ERISA), (vii) all contributions
due and payable by Target or its Subsidiaries as of the
Effective Time with respect to each Target Benefit Plan in
respect of current or prior plan years have been paid or accrued
in accordance with GAAP, (viii) none of Target, its
Subsidiaries or any other person, including any fiduciary, has
engaged in a transaction in connection with which Target, its
Subsidiaries or any Target Benefit Plan will be subject to
either a material civil penalty assessed pursuant to
Section 409 or 502(i) of ERISA or a material Tax imposed
pursuant to Section 4975 or 4976 of the Code, and
(ix) to the knowledge of Target there are no pending,
threatened or anticipated claims (other than routine claims for
benefits) by, on behalf of or against any of the Target Benefit
Plans or any trusts related thereto.
(d) Except as set forth in Section 4.11(d) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither the execution and
delivery of this Agreement nor the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby will (either alone or in
conjunction with any other event) (i) result (either alone
or upon the occurrence of any additional acts or events) in any
payment (including, without limitation, severance, unemployment
compensation, excess parachute payment (within the
meaning of Section 280G of the Code), forgiveness of
indebtedness or otherwise) becoming due to any director or any
employee of Target or any of its affiliates from Target or any
of its affiliates under any Target Benefit Plan or otherwise,
(ii) increase any benefits otherwise payable under any
Target Benefit Plan or (iii) result in any acceleration of
the time of payment or vesting of any such benefits that will,
either individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse
Effect on Target.
(e) Each Target Benefit Plan that is a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan (within the meaning of
Section 409A(d)(1) of the Code) has been operated in good
faith compliance with Section 409A of the Code, IRS Notice
2005-1,
Treasury Regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code,
and any subsequent guidance relating thereto, and no additional
tax under Section 409A(a)(1)(B) of the Code has been or is
reasonably expected to be incurred by a participant in any such
Target Benefit Plan, and no employee of
A-20
Target or its Subsidiaries is entitled to any
gross-up or
otherwise entitled to indemnification by Target, any Subsidiary
of Target or any Target ERISA Affiliate for any violation of
Section 409A of the Code.
4.12 SEC Reports. Target has previously
made available to Acquiror an accurate and complete copy of each
(a) final registration statement, prospectus, report,
schedule and definitive proxy statement filed since
January 1, 2002 by Target or any predecessor issuer,
including PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South, with the SEC or
the FDIC pursuant to the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and
prior to the date hereof, (b) comment letter of the SEC or
FDIC, and response letter of Target, PrimeTrust Bank or Bank of
the South, as the case may be, with respect to any such filings,
and (c) communication mailed by Target, PrimeTrust Bank or
Bank of the South to their respective shareholders since
January 1, 2002. Target or any predecessor issuer,
including PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South has filed all
required reports, schedules, registration statements and other
documents with the SEC or the FDIC since January 1, 2002,
collectively (the Target Reports). As of
their respective dates of filing with the SEC or the FDIC (or,
if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date hereof,
as of the date of such filing), the Target Reports complied in
all material respects with the requirements of the Securities
Act or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the rules and
regulations of the SEC or FDIC thereunder applicable to such
Target Reports, and none of the Target Reports when filed
contained any untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to
state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary
to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances
under which they were made, not misleading.
4.13 Compliance with Applicable Law.
(a) Target and each of its Subsidiaries hold all material
licenses, franchises, permits, patents, trademarks and
authorizations necessary for the lawful conduct of their
respective businesses under and pursuant to each, and have
complied in all material respects with, and are not in default
in any material respect under, any applicable law, statute,
order, rule, regulation, policy, agreement
and/or
guideline of any Governmental Entity relating to Target or any
of its Subsidiaries, except where the failure to hold such
license, franchise, permit or authorization or such
noncompliance or default will not, either individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Target.
(b) Except as will not have, either individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Target, Target and each
of its Subsidiaries have properly administered all accounts for
which it acts as a fiduciary, including accounts for which it
serves as a trustee, agent, custodian, personal representative,
guardian, conservator or investment advisor, in accordance with
the terms of the governing documents, applicable state and
federal law and regulation and common law. None of Target, any
of its Subsidiaries, or any director, officer or employee of
Target or of any of its Subsidiaries, has committed any breach
of trust with respect to any such fiduciary account that will
have a Material Adverse Effect on Target, and the accountings
for each such fiduciary account are true and correct in all
material respects and accurately reflect the assets of such
fiduciary account.
4.14 Certain Contracts.
(a) Except as disclosed in Section 4.14(a) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule, neither Target nor any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any contract,
arrangement, commitment or understanding (whether written or
oral) (i) with respect to the employment of any directors,
officers or employees other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, (ii) which, upon
the consummation or shareholder approval of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement will (either alone or upon the
occurrence of any additional acts or events) result in any
payment (whether of severance pay or otherwise) becoming due
from Target, Acquiror, the Surviving Corporation, or any of
their respective Subsidiaries to any officer or employee
thereof, (iii) which is a material contract (as
such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC) to be performed after the date of this Agreement
that has not been filed or incorporated by reference in the
Target Reports, (iv) which materially restricts the conduct
of any line of business by Target or upon consummation of the
Merger will materially restrict the ability of the Surviving
Corporation to engage in any line of business in which a bank
holding company may lawfully engage, (v) with or to a labor
union or guild (including any collective bargaining agreement),
(vi) (including any stock option plan, stock appreciation rights
plan, restricted stock plan or stock purchase plan) any of the
benefits of which will be increased, or the
A-21
vesting of the benefits of which will be accelerated, by the
occurrence of any shareholder approval or the consummation of
any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or the
value of any of the benefits of which will be calculated on the
basis of any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
or (vii) involves a lease or sublease of real property for
a term longer than one year. Target has previously made
available to Acquiror true and correct copies of all employment
and deferred compensation agreements which are in writing and to
which Target is a party. Each contract, arrangement, commitment
or understanding of the type described in this
Section 4.14(a), whether or not set forth in the
Target Disclosure Schedule, is referred to herein as a
Target Contract, and neither Target nor any
of its Subsidiaries knows of, or has received notice of, any
violation of the above by any of the other parties thereto which
will have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect on Target.
(b) (i) Each Target Contract is valid and binding on
Target or any of its Subsidiaries, as applicable, and in full
force and effect, (ii) Target and each of its Subsidiaries
has in all material respects performed all obligations required
to be performed by it to date under each Target Contract, except
where such noncompliance, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a Material Adverse Effect on Target,
and (iii) no event or condition exists which constitutes
or, after notice or lapse of time or both, will constitute, a
material default on the part of Target or any of its
Subsidiaries under any such Target Contract, except where such
default will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have
a Material Adverse Effect on Target.
4.15 Agreements with Regulatory
Agencies. Neither Target nor any of its
Subsidiaries is subject to any
cease-and-desist
or other order issued by, or is a party to any written
agreement, consent agreement or memorandum of understanding
with, or is a party to any commitment letter or similar
undertaking to, or is subject to any order or directive by, or
has been since January 1, 2002, a recipient of any
supervisory letter from, or since January 1, 2002, has
adopted any board resolutions at the request of any Regulatory
Agency or other Governmental Entity that currently restricts in
any material respect the conduct of its business, would restrict
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or that in any material manner relates to its capital
adequacy, its credit policies, its management or its business
(each, whether or not set forth in the Target Disclosure
Schedule, a Target Regulatory Agreement),
nor, to the knowledge of Target, has Target or any of its
Subsidiaries been advised since January 1, 2002, by any
Regulatory Agency or other Governmental Entity that it is
considering issuing or requesting any such Target Regulatory
Agreement.
4.16 Interest Rate Risk Management
Instruments. Except as would not be reasonably
likely to have, either individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect on Target, (a) all interest rate
swaps, caps, floors and option agreements and other interest
rate risk management arrangements, whether entered into for the
account of Target, one of its Subsidiaries, or for the account
of a customer of Target or one of its Subsidiaries, were entered
into in the ordinary course of business and, to Targets
knowledge, in accordance with prudent banking practice and
applicable rules, regulations and policies of any Regulatory
Authority and with counterparties believed to be financially
responsible at the time, and are legal, valid and binding
obligations of Target or one of its Subsidiaries enforceable in
accordance with their terms (except as may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization or similar
laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and the
availability of equitable remedies), and are in full force and
effect; (b) Target and each of its Subsidiaries have duly
performed in all material respects all of their material
obligations thereunder to the extent that such obligations to
perform have accrued; and (c) to Targets knowledge,
there are no material breaches, violations or defaults or
allegations or assertions of such by any party thereunder.
4.17 Undisclosed Liabilities. Except for
those liabilities that are fully reflected or reserved against
on the consolidated balance sheet of Target included in the
Target
Form 10-Q
or as set forth in Section 4.17 of the Target Disclosure
Schedule and for liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice since June 30, 2007,
neither Target nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any
liability of any nature whatsoever (whether absolute, accrued,
contingent or otherwise and whether due or to become due) that,
either individually or in the aggregate, has had or will have, a
Material Adverse Effect on Target.
4.18 Insurance. Target and its
Subsidiaries have in effect insurance coverage with reputable
insurers or are self-insured, which in respect of amounts,
premiums, types and risks insured, constitutes reasonably
A-22
adequate coverage against all risks customarily insured against
by bank holding companies and their subsidiaries comparable in
size and operations to Target and its Subsidiaries.
4.19 Environmental Liability. Except as
set forth in Section 4.19 of the Target Disclosure
Schedule, there are no legal, administrative, arbitral or other
proceedings, claims, actions, causes of action, private
environmental investigations or remediation activities or
governmental investigations of any nature seeking to impose, or
that could reasonably result in the imposition, on Target of any
liability or obligation arising under common law or under any
local, state or federal environmental statute, regulation or
ordinance including, without limitation, CERCLA, pending or, to
the knowledge of Target, threatened against Target, which
liability or obligation will, either individually or in the
aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect on Target. To the
knowledge of Target, there is no reasonable basis for any such
proceeding, claim, action or governmental investigation that
would impose any liability or obligation that will, either
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect
on Target. Target is not subject to any agreement, order,
judgment, decree, letter or memorandum by or with any court,
governmental authority, regulatory agency or third party
imposing any liability or obligation with respect to the
foregoing that will have, either individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Target.
4.20 State Takeover Laws. The Board of
Directors of Target has approved the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement for purposes of
Sections 48-103-101
through
48-103-505
of the TBCA, if applicable to Target, such that the provisions
of such sections of the TCBA will not apply to this Agreement or
any of the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
4.21 Reorganization. As of the date of
this Agreement, Target is not aware of any fact or circumstance
that would reasonably be expected to prevent the Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
4.22 Information Supplied. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by Target for inclusion
or incorporation by reference in (i) the
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading, and (ii) the Joint Proxy Statement will, at the
date of mailing to shareholders and at the times of the meetings
of shareholders to be held in connection with the Merger,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
Joint Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material
respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules
and regulations of the SEC thereunder, except that no
representation or warranty is made by Target with respect to
statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on
information supplied by Acquiror for inclusion or incorporation
by reference in the Joint Proxy Statement.
4.23 Internal Controls. The records,
systems, controls, data and information of Target and its
Subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated under
means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic
process, whether computerized or not) that are under the
exclusive ownership and direct control of Target or its
Subsidiaries or accountants (including all means of access
thereto and therefrom), except for any non-exclusive ownership
and non-direct control that would not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on the system of internal
accounting controls described in the following sentence. As and
to the extent described in the Target Reports filed with the SEC
prior to the date hereof, Target and its Subsidiaries have
devised and maintain a system of internal accounting controls
sufficient to provide reasonable assurances regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Target
(i) has designed disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to Target, including
its Subsidiaries, is made known to the management of Target by
others within those entities, and (ii) has disclosed, based
on its most recent evaluation prior to the date hereof, to
Targets independent registered public accounting firm and
the audit committee of Targets Board of Directors
(x) any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Targets ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and (y) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
A-23
management or other employees who have a significant role in
Targets internal control over financial reporting.. Target
has made available to Acquiror a summary of any such disclosure
made by management to Targets auditors and audit committee
since January 1, 2004. Target has initiated its process of
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and expects to be in full compliance therewith by the
mandated compliance date.
4.24 Opinion of Target Financial
Advisor. Target has received the opinion of its
financial advisor, Hovde Financial LLC dated the date of this
Agreement, to the effect that the consideration received by the
holders of Target Common Stock is fair, from a financial point
of view, to Target and the holders of Target Common Stock.
ARTICLE V.
COVENANTS
RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
5.1 Conduct of Businesses Prior to the Effective
Time. During the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, except as expressly
contemplated or permitted by this Agreement (including the
Acquiror Disclosure Schedule and the Target Disclosure
Schedule), each of Target and Acquiror shall, and shall cause
each of their respective Subsidiaries to, (a) conduct its
business in the ordinary course in all material respects,
(b) use reasonable best efforts to maintain and preserve
intact its business organization, employees and advantageous
business relationships and retain the services of its key
officers and key employees and (c) take no action which
would adversely affect or delay the ability of either Target or
Acquiror to obtain any necessary approvals of any Regulatory
Agency or other governmental authority required for the
transactions contemplated hereby or to perform its covenants and
agreements under this Agreement or to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby.
5.2 Target Forbearances. During the
period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time,
except as set forth in the Target Disclosure Schedule and except
as expressly contemplated or permitted by this Agreement, Target
shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
without the prior written consent of Acquiror (which consent
shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed):
(a) other than as set forth in Section 5.2(a) of the
Target Disclosure Schedule or in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, incur any indebtedness for
borrowed money (other than short-term indebtedness incurred to
refinance short-term indebtedness), or assume, guarantee,
endorse or otherwise as an accommodation become responsible for
the obligations of any other individual, corporation or other
entity (it being understood and agreed that incurrence of
indebtedness in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice shall include the creation of deposit liabilities,
purchases of Federal funds, sales of certificates of deposit and
entering into repurchase agreements);
(b) (i) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any
shares of its capital stock; (ii) make, declare or pay any
dividend, or make any other distribution on, or directly or
indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of
its capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible
(whether currently convertible or convertible only after the
passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or
exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock except
(A) dividends paid by any of the Subsidiaries of Target to
Target or to any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries, (B) the
acceptance of shares of Targets Common Stock as payment of
the exercise price of stock options or for withholding taxes
incurred in connection with the exercise of Targets Stock
Options or the vesting or lapse of forfeiture restrictions of
Target stock-based awards, in accordance with the terms of the
applicable award agreements), or (C) the acceptance of
shares of Target Common Stock upon forfeiture of any restricted
shares pursuant to any award of restricted shares under a Target
Stock Plan; (iii) grant any stock appreciation rights or
grant any individual, corporation or other entity any right to
acquire any shares of its capital stock; or (iv) issue any
additional shares of capital stock except pursuant to the
exercise of Target Stock Options outstanding as of the date of
this Agreement or issued thereafter in compliance with this
Agreement;
(c) (i) except as set forth in Section 5.2(c) of
the Target Disclosure Schedule, increase the wages, salaries,
compensation, pension, or other fringe benefits or perquisites
payable to any officer, employee,
A-24
or director of Target, (ii) pay any pension or retirement
allowance not required by any existing plan or agreement or by
applicable law, (iii) pay any bonus, (iv) become a
party to, amend or commit itself to, any pension, retirement,
profit-sharing or welfare benefit plan or agreement or
employment agreement with or for the benefit of any employee, or
(v) except as required under any existing plan, grant, or
agreement, accelerate the vesting of, or the lapsing of
restrictions with respect to, any Target Stock Options or
restricted shares of Target Common Stock;
(d) sell, transfer, mortgage, encumber or otherwise dispose
of any of its properties or assets that are material to Target
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any individual,
corporation or other entity other than a Subsidiary or cancel,
release or assign any indebtedness that is material to Target
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any such person or
any claims held by any such person that are material to Target
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in each case other than
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
or pursuant to contracts in force at the date of this Agreement;
(e) enter into any new line of business that is material to
Target and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or change its
lending, investment, underwriting, risk and asset liability
management and other banking and operating policies that are
material to Target and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
except as required by applicable law, regulation or policies
imposed by any Governmental Entity;
(f) except for transactions made in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice or as set forth in
Section 5.2(f) of the Target Disclosure Schedule,
make any material capital expenditure either by purchase or sale
of fixed assets, property transfers, or purchase or sale of any
property or assets of any other individual, corporation or other
entity;
(g) knowingly take any action, or knowingly fail to take
any action, which action or failure to act is reasonably likely
to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
(h) amend the Target Charter or Bylaws or any charter or
bylaws of any Target Subsidiary, or otherwise take any action to
exempt any person or entity (other than Acquiror or its
Subsidiaries) or any action taken by any person or entity from
any takeover statute or similarly restrictive provisions of its
organizational documents or terminate, amend or waive any
provisions of any confidentiality or standstill agreements in
place with any third parties;
(i) other than in prior consultation with Acquiror,
restructure or materially change its investment securities
portfolio or its gap position, through purchases, sales or
otherwise, or the manner in which the portfolio is classified or
reported;
(j) settle any material claim, action or proceeding, except
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(k) take any action that is intended or is reasonably
likely to result in any of its representations or warranties set
forth in this Agreement being or becoming untrue in any material
respect at any time prior to the Effective Time, or in any of
the conditions to the Merger set forth in
Article VII not being satisfied or in a violation of
any provision of this Agreement, except, in every case, as may
be required by applicable law;
(l) implement or adopt any change in its tax accounting or
financial accounting principles, practices or methods, other
than as may be required by applicable law or regulation, GAAP or
regulatory guidelines;
(m) terminate any of the Business Protection Agreements
entered into with each of Gary Scott, Jason West, Sam Short and
David Majors:
(n) take any action that would materially impede or delay
the ability of the parties to obtain any necessary approvals of
any Regulatory Agency or Governmental Entity required for the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or
A-25
(o) agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt
any resolutions of its board of directors in support of, any of
the actions prohibited by this Section 5.2.
5.3 Acquiror Forbearances. During the
period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time,
except as set forth in the Acquiror Disclosure Schedule and
except as expressly contemplated or permitted by this Agreement,
Acquiror shall not, and shall not permit any of its Subsidiaries
to, without the prior written consent of Target (which consent
shall not be unreasonably withheld):
(a) (i) adjust, split, combine or reclassify any
shares of its capital stock; (ii) make, declare or pay any
dividend, or make any other distribution on, or directly or
indirectly redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire, any shares of
its capital stock or any securities or obligations convertible
(whether currently convertible or convertible only after the
passage of time or the occurrence of certain events) into or
exchangeable for any shares of its capital stock except
(A) dividends paid by any of the Subsidiaries of Acquiror
to Acquiror or to any of its wholly-owned Subsidiaries,
(B) the acceptance of shares of Acquirors Common
Stock as payment of the exercise price of stock options or for
withholding taxes incurred in connection with the exercise of
Acquirors Stock Options, or the vesting or lapse of
forfeiture restrictions of Acquiror stock-based awards, in
accordance with the terms of applicable award agreements, or
(C) the acceptance of shares of Acquiror Common Stock upon
forfeiture of any restricted shares pursuant to an award of
restricted shares under any Acquiror Stock Plan;
(iii) grant any stock appreciation rights or grant any
individual, corporation or other entity any right or option to
acquire any shares of its capital stock, other than grants to
employees or directors of Acquiror made in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practices under the Acquiror
Stock Plans; or (iv) issue any additional shares of its
capital stock except the issuance of shares of restricted stock
pursuant to the Acquiror Stock Plans consistent with past
practices or pursuant to the exercise of the Acquiror Warrants
or Acquiror Stock Options outstanding as of the date of this
Agreement, pursuant to the terms of the Acquiror Stock Plans, or
issued thereafter in compliance with this Agreement;
(b) acquire or agree to acquire, by merging or
consolidating with, or by purchasing a substantial equity
interest in or a substantial portion of the assets of, or by any
other manner, any business or any corporation, partnership,
association, or other business organization or division thereof
or otherwise acquire any assets, which would be material,
individually or in the aggregate, to Acquiror, other than
(i) any such acquisition that would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Acquiror, or
materially delay completion of the transactions contemplated
hereby or have any effect specified in
Section 5.3(f) or (ii) in connection with
foreclosures, settlements in lieu of foreclosure or troubled
loan or debt restructurings in the ordinary course of business
consistent with prudent banking practices;
(c) knowingly take any action, or knowingly fail to take
any action, which action or failure to act is reasonably likely
to prevent the Merger from qualifying as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code;
(d) amend the Acquiror Charter (except to authorize
additional shares of Acquiror Common Stock);
(e) take any action that is intended or is reasonably
likely to result in any of its representations or warranties set
forth in this Agreement being or becoming untrue in any material
respect at any time prior to the Effective Time, or in any of
the conditions to the Merger set forth in
Article VII not being satisfied or in a violation of
any provision of this Agreement, except, in every case, as may
be required by applicable law;
(f) take any action that would materially impede or delay
the ability of the parties to obtain any necessary approvals of
any Regulatory Agency or Governmental Entity required for the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or
(g) agree to take, make any commitment to take, or adopt
any resolutions of its board of directors in support of, any of
the actions prohibited by this Section 5.3; or
A-26
ARTICLE VI.
ADDITIONAL
AGREEMENTS
6.1 Regulatory Matters.
(a) Target and Acquiror shall promptly prepare and file
with the SEC the Joint Proxy Statement and Acquiror shall
promptly prepare and file with the SEC the
Form S-4,
in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a
prospectus. Each of Target and Acquiror shall use their
reasonable best efforts in consultation with their respective
legal counsel to have the
Form S-4
declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as
practicable after such filing, and Target and Acquiror shall
thereafter mail or deliver the Joint Proxy Statement to their
respective shareholders. Acquiror shall also use its reasonable
best efforts to obtain all necessary state securities law or
Blue Sky permits and approvals required to carry out
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and Target
shall furnish all information concerning Target and the holders
of Target Capital Stock as may be reasonably requested in
connection with any such action. If at any time prior to or
after the Effective Time any information relating to either of
the parties, or their respective affiliates, officers or
directors, should be discovered by either party which should be
set forth in an amendment or supplement to any of the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus so that such documents
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, the party which discovers such information
shall promptly notify the other party hereto and, to the extent
required by law, rules or regulations, an appropriate amendment
or supplement describing such information shall be promptly
filed with the SEC and disseminated or made available on the
SECs EDGAR database to the shareholders of Acquiror and
Target.
(b) The parties hereto shall cooperate with each other and
use their reasonable best efforts to promptly prepare and file
all necessary documentation to effect all applications, notices,
petitions and filings, to obtain as promptly as practicable all
permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third
parties and Governmental Entities which are necessary or
advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement (including, without limitation, the Merger), and to
comply with the terms and conditions of all such permits,
consents, approvals and authorizations of all such Governmental
Entities. Target and Acquiror shall have the right to review in
advance, and, to the extent practicable, each will consult the
other on, in each case subject to applicable laws relating to
the exchange of information, all the information relating to
Acquiror or Target, as the case may be, and any of their
respective Subsidiaries, which appear in any filing made with,
or written materials submitted to, any third party or any
Governmental Entity in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. In exercising the foregoing
right, each of the parties hereto shall act reasonably and as
promptly as practicable. The parties hereto agree that they will
consult with each other with respect to the obtaining of all
permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third
parties and Governmental Entities necessary or advisable to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
each party will keep the other apprised of the status of matters
relating to completion of the transactions contemplated herein.
(c) Each of Target and Acquiror shall, upon request,
furnish to the other all information concerning itself, its
Subsidiaries, directors, officers and shareholders and such
other matters as may be reasonably necessary or advisable in
connection with the Joint Proxy Statement, the
Form S-4
or any other statement, filing, notice or application made by or
on behalf of Target, Acquiror or any of their respective
Subsidiaries to any Governmental Entity in connection with the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(d) Each of Target and Acquiror shall promptly advise the
other upon receiving any communication from any Governmental
Entity whose consent or approval is required for consummation of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement that causes such
party to believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that any
Requisite Regulatory Approval (as defined below) will not be
obtained, that the receipt of any such approval will be
materially delayed or that non-customary or burdensome
conditions or post-closing requirements might be imposed on any
such Required Regulatory Approval.
A-27
(e) Acquiror and Target shall promptly furnish each other
with copies of written communications received by Acquiror and
Target, as the case may be, or any of their respective
Subsidiaries from, or delivered by any of the foregoing to, any
Governmental Entity in respect of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement.
6.2 Access to Information.
(a) Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable laws
relating to the exchange of information, each of Target and
Acquiror, for the purposes of verifying the representations and
warranties of the other and preparing for the Merger and the
other matters contemplated by this Agreement, shall, and shall
cause each of their respective Subsidiaries to, afford to the
officers, employees, accountants, counsel and other
representatives of the other party, access, during normal
business hours during the period prior to the Effective Time, to
all its properties, books, contracts, commitments and records
and, during such period, each of Target and Acquiror shall, and
shall cause their respective Subsidiaries to, make available to
the other party (i) a copy of each report, schedule,
registration statement and other document filed or received by
it during such period pursuant to the requirements of federal
securities laws or federal or state banking laws (other than
reports or documents which Target or Acquiror, as the case may
be, is not permitted to disclose under applicable law) and
(ii) all other information concerning its business,
properties and personnel as such party may reasonably request.
Neither Target nor Acquiror nor any of their respective
Subsidiaries shall be required to provide access to or to
disclose information where such access or disclosure would
violate or prejudice the rights of Targets or
Acquirors, as the case may be, customers, jeopardize the
attorney-client privilege of the institution in possession or
control of such information or contravene any law, rule,
regulation, order, judgment, decree, fiduciary duty or binding
agreement entered into prior to the date of this Agreement. The
parties hereto will make appropriate substitute disclosure
arrangements under circumstances in which the restrictions of
the preceding sentence apply.
(b) Each of Acquiror and Target agrees that it will not,
and will cause its representatives not to, use any information
obtained pursuant to this Section 6.2 (as well as
any other information obtained prior to the date hereof in
connection with entering into this Agreement) for any purpose
unrelated to the consummation of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement. Subject to the requirements of law, each
party will keep confidential, and will cause its representative
to keep confidential, all information and documents obtained
pursuant to this Section 6.2 (as well as any other
information obtained prior to the date hereof in connection with
the entering into of this Agreement) unless such information
(i) was already known to such party, (ii) becomes
available to such party from other sources not known by such
party to be bound by a confidentiality obligation, (iii) is
disclosed with the prior written approval of the providing party
or (iv) is or becomes readily ascertainable from publicly
available sources. If this Agreement is terminated or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall otherwise fail
to be consummated, each party shall promptly cause all copies of
documents or extracts thereof containing information and data as
to the other party to be returned to the other party or shall
promptly destroy such items and certify to such other party the
destruction thereof.
(c) No investigation by either of the parties or their
respective representatives shall affect the representations and
warranties of the other set forth herein.
6.3 Shareholders Approvals. Each
of Target and Acquiror shall call a meeting of its shareholders
(a Target Shareholders Meeting or
Acquiror Shareholders Meeting, as the
case may be) to be held as soon as reasonably practicable for
the purpose of voting upon proposals to adopt and approve this
Agreement and the Merger, and each shall use its reasonable best
efforts, to cause such meetings to occur as soon as reasonably
practicable and on the same date. The Board of Directors of each
of Acquiror and Target shall use its reasonable best efforts
(and subject to its fiduciary duty) to obtain from the
shareholders of Acquiror and Target, as the case may be, the
vote in favor of the adoption of this Agreement required by the
TBCA and Acquirors and Targets Charter and Bylaws,
as the case may be, to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby (such approval a Target Shareholder
Approval or Acquiror Shareholder
Approval, as the case may be). Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary herein, unless this Agreement has been
terminated, this Agreement shall be submitted to the
shareholders of Target and Acquiror at such meeting for the
purpose of
A-28
obtaining the Target Shareholder Approval or Acquiror
Shareholder Approval, as the case may be, and voting on the
approval and adoption of this Agreement and nothing contained
herein shall be deemed to relieve Target and Acquiror of such
obligations.
6.4 Legal Conditions to Merger. Each of
Target and Acquiror shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to,
use their reasonable best efforts (a) to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions reasonably necessary, proper or advisable
to comply promptly with all legal requirements that may be
imposed on such party or its Subsidiaries with respect to the
Merger and, subject to the conditions set forth in
Article VII hereof, to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, and (b) to obtain (and to
cooperate with the other party to obtain) any material consent,
authorization, order or approval of, or any exemption by, any
Governmental Entity and any other third party that is required
to be obtained by Acquiror or Target or any of their respective
Subsidiaries in connection with the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
6.5 Affiliates. Target shall use its
reasonable best efforts to cause each director, executive
officer and other person who is an affiliate (for
purposes of Rule 145 under the Securities Act) of Target to
deliver to Acquiror, as soon as practicable after the date of
this Agreement, and prior to the date of the shareholders
meetings called by Target to be held pursuant to
Section 6.3, a written agreement, in the form of
Exhibit 6.5.
6.6 Stock Quotation or Listing. Acquiror
shall cause the shares of Acquiror Common Stock to be issued in
the Merger to be qualified for quotation or listing on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market, subject to official notice of
issuance, prior to the Effective Time.
6.7 Employee Benefit Plans; Existing Agreements.
(a) Within one year following the Effective Time, to the
extent permissible under the terms of the Acquiror Benefit
Plans, the employees of Target and its Subsidiaries (the
Target Employees) will be eligible to
participate in Acquirors employee benefit plans in which
similarly situated employees of Acquiror or its Subsidiaries
participate, to the same extent as similarly situated employees
of Acquiror or its Subsidiaries (it being understood that
inclusion of Target Employees in Acquirors employee
benefit plans may occur at different times with respect to
different plans) except as provided below.
(b) With respect to each Acquiror Benefit Plan that is an
employee benefit plan, as defined in
section 3(3) of ERISA, for purposes of determining
eligibility to participate, and entitlement to benefits,
including for severance benefits and vacation entitlement, but
not for purposes of benefit accrual, service with Target shall
be treated as service with Acquiror; provided,
however, that such service shall not be recognized to the
extent that such recognition would result in a duplication or
increase of benefits. Such service also shall to the extent
permissible under the terms of the Acquiror Benefit Plans and as
permitted by the applicable insurer, apply for purposes of
satisfying any waiting periods, evidence of insurability
requirements, or the application of any preexisting condition
limitations. Each Acquiror Benefit Plan shall to the extent
permissible under the terms of the Acquiror Benefit Plans and as
permitted by the applicable insurer, waive pre-existing
condition limitations to the same extent waived under the
applicable Target Benefit Plan. Target Employees shall be given
credit for amounts paid under a corresponding benefit plan
during the same period for purposes of applying deductibles,
copayments and out-of-pocket maximums as though such amounts had
been paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Acquiror Benefit Plans and to the extent permissible by the
applicable insurer.
(c) From and after the Effective Time, Acquiror or the
Surviving Corporation, as applicable, will assume and honor and
shall cause the appropriate Subsidiaries of Acquiror to assume
and to honor in accordance with their terms all employment,
severance, change of control and other compensation agreements
and arrangements between Target or its Subsidiaries and any
employee thereof, and all accrued and vested benefit
obligations, existing prior to the execution of this Agreement
which are between Target or any of its Subsidiaries and any
current or former director, officer, employee or consultant
thereof.
(d) From and after the Effective Time, Acquiror or the
Surviving Corporation, as applicable, will, and will cause any
applicable Subsidiary thereof or Employee Benefit Plan, to
provide or pay when due to Targets employees as of the
Effective Time all benefits and compensation pursuant to Target
Benefit Plans, programs
A-29
and arrangements in effect on the date hereof earned or accrued
through, and to which such individuals are entitled as of the
Effective Time (or such later time as such Benefit Plans as in
effect at the Effective Time are terminated or canceled by
Acquiror or the Surviving Corporation) subject to compliance
with the terms of this Agreement.
6.8 Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance.
(a) In the event of any threatened or actual claim, action,
suit, proceeding or investigation, whether civil, criminal or
administrative, including, without limitation, any such claim,
action, suit, proceeding or investigation in which any
individual who is now, or has been at any time prior to the date
of this Agreement, or who becomes prior to the Effective Time, a
director or officer or employee of Target or any of its
Subsidiaries, or who is or was serving at the request of Target
or any of its Subsidiaries as a director, officer, employee or
agent of another person, including any entity specified in the
Target Disclosure Schedule (the Indemnified
Parties), is, or is threatened to be, made a party
based in whole or in part on, or arising in whole or in part out
of, or pertaining to (i) the fact that he is or was a
director, officer or employee of Target or any of its
Subsidiaries or any of their respective predecessors or
(ii) this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated
hereby, whether in any case asserted or arising before or after
the Effective Time, the parties hereto agree to cooperate and
use their best efforts to defend against and respond thereto. It
is understood and agreed that after the Effective Time, Acquiror
shall indemnify and hold harmless, as and to the fullest extent
permitted by law, each such Indemnified Party against any
losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs, expenses (including
reasonable attorneys fees and expenses in advance of the
final disposition of any claim, suit, proceeding or
investigation to each Indemnified Party to the fullest extent
permitted by law upon receipt of any undertaking required by
applicable law), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement
in connection with any such threatened or actual claim, action,
suit, proceeding or investigation.
(b) Acquiror shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause
the individuals serving as officers and directors of Target, its
Subsidiaries or any entity specified in the Target Disclosure
Schedule immediately prior to the Effective Time to be covered
for a period of six (6) years from the Effective Time (or
the period of the applicable statute of limitations, if longer)
by the directors and officers liability insurance
policy maintained by Target (provided that Acquiror may
substitute therefor policies of at least the same coverage and
amounts containing terms and conditions which are not less
advantageous than such policy) with respect to acts or omissions
occurring prior to the Effective Time which were committed by
such officers and directors in their capacity as such.
(c) In the event Acquiror or any of its successors or
assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other
person and shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation
or entity of such consolidation or merger, or
(ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any person, then, and in each such
case, to the extent necessary, proper provision shall be made so
that the successors and assigns of Acquiror assume the
obligations set forth in this Section 6.8.
(d) The provisions of this Section 6.8 shall
survive the Effective Time and are intended to be for the
benefit of, and shall be enforceable by, each Indemnified Party
and his or her heirs and representatives.
6.9 Additional Agreements. In case at
any time before or after the Effective Time any further action
is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this
Agreement (including, without limitation, any merger between a
Subsidiary of Acquiror, on the one hand, and a Subsidiary of
Target, on the other) or to vest the Surviving Corporation with
full title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals,
immunities and franchises of any of the parties to the Merger,
the proper officers and directors of each party to this
Agreement and their respective Subsidiaries shall take all such
necessary action as may be reasonably requested by, and at the
sole expense of, Acquiror. As long as Acquiror has certified to
Target that all conditions to Closing have been met as described
in this Agreement, if Acquiror makes a request to Target to make
accounting adjustments prior to the Effective Time, such changes
shall be made, but to the extent Target might not have otherwise
made such adjustments except at the request of Acquiror, such
changes shall not impact the calculation of income or financial
returns for purposes of determining the bonuses of employees of
Target or its Subsidiaries.
A-30
6.10 Advice of Changes. Target and
Acquiror shall each promptly advise the other party of any
change or event (i) having a Material Adverse Effect on it
or (ii) which it believes would or would be reasonably
likely to cause or constitute a material breach of any of its
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements contained
herein; provided, however, that no such notification shall
affect the representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
of the parties (or remedies with respect thereto) or the
conditions to the obligations of the parties under this
Agreement; provided further that a failure to comply with this
Section 6.10 shall not constitute the failure of any
condition set forth in Article VII to be satisfied
unless the underlying Material Adverse Effect or material breach
would independently result in the failure of a condition set
forth in Article VII to be satisfied.
6.11 Exemption from Liability Under
Section 16(b). Acquiror and Target agree
that, in order to most effectively compensate and retain Target
Insiders (as defined below) in connection with the Merger, both
prior to and after the Effective Time, it is desirable that
Target Insiders not be subject to a risk of liability under
Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law in connection with the conversion of
shares of Target Common Stock and Target Stock Options into
shares of Acquiror Common Stock in the Merger, and for that
compensatory and retentive purpose agree to the provisions of
this Section 6.11. Assuming that Target delivers to
Acquiror the Section 16 Information (as defined below) in a
timely fashion, the Board of Directors of Acquiror, or a
committee of Non-Employee Directors thereof (as such term is
defined for purposes of
Rule 16b-3(d)
under the Exchange Act), shall adopt a resolution providing that
the receipt by Target Insiders of Acquiror Common Stock in
exchange for shares of Target Common Stock, and of options on
Acquiror Common Stock upon assumption of options to purchase
Target Common Stock, in each case pursuant to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and to the extent such securities
are listed in the Section 16 Information, are intended to
be exempt from liability pursuant to Section 16(b) under
the Exchange Act. The term Section 16
Information shall mean information accurate in all
material respects regarding Target Insiders, the number of
shares of Target Common Stock held by each such Target Insider
and expected to be exchanged for Acquiror Common Stock in the
Merger, and the number and description of the options on Target
Common Stock held by each such Target Insider and expected to be
assumed by Acquiror in connection with the Merger; provided that
the requirement for a description of any Target Stock Options
shall be deemed to be satisfied if copies of all Target Stock
Plans, and forms of agreements evidencing grants thereunder,
under which such Target Stock Options have been granted, have
been made available to Acquiror. The term Target
Insiders shall mean those officers and directors of
Target who are subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and who are listed in the
Section 16 Information.
6.12 Acquisition Proposals.
(a) Target and its Subsidiaries and each of their
respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, agents
and representatives (including any investment banker, financial
advisor, attorney, accountant or other representative retained
by Target or any of its Subsidiaries) shall immediately cease
any discussions or negotiations with any other parties that may
be ongoing with respect to the possibility or consideration of
any Acquisition Proposal, as defined below. From the date of
this Agreement through the Effective Time, Target shall not, nor
shall it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, nor shall it
authorize or permit any of its or its Subsidiaries
directors, officers or employees or any investment banker,
financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other representative
retained by it or any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly through another person, (i) solicit, initiate or
encourage (including by way of furnishing information or
assistance), or take any other action designed to facilitate or
encourage any inquiries or the making of any proposal that
constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, any Acquisition
Proposal, (ii) participate in any discussions or
negotiations regarding any Acquisition Proposal or
(iii) make or authorize any statement, recommendation or
solicitation in support of any Acquisition Proposal. Any
violation of the foregoing restrictions by any representative of
Target, whether or not such representative is so authorized and
whether or not such representative is purporting to act on
behalf of such party or otherwise, shall be deemed to be a
breach of this Agreement by Target.
(b) (i) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of
Directors of Target shall be permitted, prior to its meeting of
shareholders to be held pursuant to Section 6.3, to
engage in discussions and negotiations with, or provide any
nonpublic information or data to, any person in response to an
unsolicited bona fide written
A-31
Acquisition Proposal by such person made after the date of this
Agreement which its Board of Directors concludes in good faith
constitutes or is reasonably likely to result in a Superior
Proposal, as defined below, if and only to the extent that the
Board of Directors of Target reasonably determines in good faith
(after consultation with outside legal counsel) that failure to
do so would cause it to violate its fiduciary duties under
applicable law and subject to compliance with the other terms of
this Section 6.12 and to first entering into a
confidentiality agreement having customary non-disclosure,
confidentiality, standstill and non-solicitation and no hire
provisions that are reasonably satisfactory to Acquiror.
(ii) Target shall notify Acquiror promptly (but in no event
later than 24 hours) after receipt of any Acquisition
Proposal, or any request for nonpublic information relating to
Target or any of its Subsidiaries by any person that informs
Target or any of its Subsidiaries that it is considering making,
or has made, an Acquisition Proposal, or any inquiry from any
person seeking to have discussions or negotiations with such
party relating to a possible Acquisition Proposal. Such notice
shall be made orally and confirmed in writing, and shall
indicate the identity of the person making the Acquisition
Proposal, inquiry or request and the material terms and
conditions of any inquiries, proposals or offers (including a
copy thereof if in writing and any related documentation or
correspondence). Target shall also promptly, and in any event
within 24 hours, notify Acquiror, orally and in writing, if
it enters into discussions or negotiations concerning any
Acquisition Proposal or provides nonpublic information or data
to any person in accordance with this
Section 6.12(b) and keep Acquiror informed of the
status and terms of any such proposals, offers, discussions or
negotiations on a current basis, including by providing a copy
of all material documentation or correspondence relating thereto.
(iii) Nothing contained in this Section 6.14
shall prohibit Target or its Subsidiaries from taking and
disclosing to its shareholders a position required by
Rule 14e-2(a)
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act; provided, however, that
compliance with such rules shall not in any way limit or modify
the effect that any action taken pursuant to such rules has
under any other provision of this Agreement.
(c) Target agrees that (i) it will and will cause its
Subsidiaries, and its and their officers, directors, agents,
representatives and advisors to, cease immediately and terminate
any and all existing activities, discussions or negotiations
with any third parties conducted heretofore with respect to any
Acquisition Proposal, and (ii) it will not release any
third party from, or waive any provisions of, any
confidentiality or standstill agreement to which it or any of
its Subsidiaries is a party with respect to any Acquisition
Proposal.
(d) Nothing in this Section 6.12 shall
(x) permit Target to terminate this Agreement or
(y) affect any other obligation of Target under this
Agreement. Target shall not submit to the vote of its
shareholders any Acquisition Proposal other than the Merger.
(e) For purposes of this Agreement, the term
Acquisition Proposal means any inquiry, proposal or
offer, filing of any regulatory application or notice (whether
in draft or final form) or disclosure of an intention to do any
of the foregoing from any person relating to any (w) direct
or indirect acquisition or purchase of a business that
constitutes a substantial portion of the net revenues, net
income or assets of Target or any of its significant
subsidiaries (as defined under
Regulation S-X
of the SEC), (x) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase
of any class of equity securities representing 10% or more of
the voting power of Target or its significant subsidiaries,
(y) tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated
would result in any person beneficially owning 10% or more of
the voting power of Target, or (z) merger, consolidation,
business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution
or similar transaction involving Target or any of its
Subsidiaries, in each case other than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(f) For purposes of this Agreement, Superior
Proposal means a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal
which the Board of Directors of Target concludes in good faith,
after consultation with its financial advisors and legal
advisors, taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory
and other aspects of the proposal and the person making the
proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation), (i) is more favorable to the shareholders of
Target from a financial point of view, than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and (ii) is fully financed
or reasonably capable of being fully financed, reasonably likely
to receive all required governmental approvals on a timely basis
and otherwise reasonably capable of being completed on the terms
proposed; provided that, for purposes of this definition of
Superior Proposal, the term Acquisition Proposal
shall have the meaning assigned to such term in
A-32
Section 6.12(e) except that the reference to
10% or more in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal shall be deemed to be a reference to a
majority and Acquisition Proposal shall only
be deemed to refer to a transaction involving Target.
6.13 Bank Merger. At or prior to the
Effective Time, if requested by Acquiror, Target shall cause
PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South, or one of such banks, to
enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Bank
Merger Agreement) with Pinnacle National Bank pursuant to
which PrimeTrust Bank and Bank of the South, or one of such
banks, shall merge with and into Pinnacle National Bank after
the Merger. Promptly following execution of such Bank Merger
Agreement, Target shall approve such agreement as the sole
shareholder of PrimeTrust Bank or Bank of the South, as the case
may be. The Bank Merger Agreement shall contain such terms and
conditions as are reasonable, normal and customary in light of
the transactions contemplated hereby including a covenant that
consummation of the merger of PrimeTrust Bank or Bank of the
South, as the case may be, with and into Pinnacle National Bank
would not occur earlier than simultaneous with consummation of
the Merger and a provision for termination of the Bank Merger
Agreement upon termination of this Agreement.
ARTICLE VII.
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
7.1 Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect
the Merger. The respective obligations of the
parties to effect the Merger shall be subject to the
satisfaction at or prior to the Effective Time of the following
conditions:
(a) Shareholder Approval. This Agreement
shall have been adopted by the respective requisite affirmative
votes of the holders of Acquiror Common Stock and Target Common
Stock entitled to vote thereon.
(b) Listing or Quotation. The shares of
Acquiror Common Stock which shall be issued to the shareholders
of Target upon consummation of the Merger shall have been
qualified for quotation on the NASDAQ Global Select Market,
subject to official notice of issuance.
(c) Regulatory Approvals. All regulatory
approvals set forth in Section 3.4 and
Section 4.4 required to consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger, shall have
been obtained and shall remain in full force and effect and all
statutory waiting periods in respect thereof shall have expired
(all such approvals and the expiration of all such waiting
periods being referred to herein as the Requisite
Regulatory Approvals).
(d) Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have become effective under the Securities Act and no stop
order suspending the effectiveness of the
Form S-4
shall have been issued and no proceedings for that purpose shall
have been initiated or threatened by the SEC.
(e) No Injunctions or Restraints;
Illegality. No order, injunction or decree issued
by any court or agency of competent jurisdiction or other legal
restraint or prohibition preventing the consummation of the
Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement shall be in effect. No statute, rule, regulation,
order, injunction or decree shall have been enacted, entered,
promulgated or enforced by any Governmental Entity which
prohibits, materially restricts or makes illegal consummation of
the Merger.
(f) Federal Tax Opinion. The parties
hereto shall have received the opinion of Bass,
Berry & Sims PLC, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Target and its counsel, dated the Closing Date,
substantially to the effect that, on the basis of facts,
representations and assumptions set forth in each such opinion
which are consistent with the state of facts existing at the
Effective Time:
(i) The Merger will constitute a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code, and Acquiror and Target will
each be a party to the reorganization;
(ii) No gain or loss will be recognized by Acquiror or
Target as a result of the Merger; and
A-33
(iii) No gain or loss will be recognized by shareholders of
Target who exchange their Target Common Stock for the Merger
Consideration pursuant to the Merger (except with respect to the
Cash Consideration and cash received in lieu of a fractional
share interest in Acquiror Common Stock).
In rendering such opinion, counsel may require and rely upon
representations contained in certificates of officers of
Acquiror, Target and others.
7.2 Conditions to Obligations of
Target. The obligation of Target to effect the
Merger is also subject to the satisfaction, or waiver by Target,
at or prior to the Effective Time, of the following conditions:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. Subject to the standard set forth in
Section 9.2, the representations and warranties of
Acquiror set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct
in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as
of the Effective Time (except that representations and
warranties that by their terms speak specifically as of the date
of this Agreement or another date shall be true and correct as
of such date); and Target shall have received a certificate
signed on behalf of Acquiror by the Chief Executive Officer and
the Chief Financial Officer of Acquiror to the foregoing effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of
Acquiror. Acquiror shall have performed in all
material respects all obligations required to be performed by it
under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and Target
shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of Acquiror
by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Acquiror to such effect.
7.3 Conditions to Obligations of
Acquiror. The obligation of Acquiror to effect
the Merger is also subject to the satisfaction or waiver by
Acquiror at or prior to the Effective Time of the following
conditions:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. Subject to the standard set forth in
Section 9.2., the representations and warranties of
Target set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct in
all material respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of
the Effective Time (except that representations and warranties
that by their terms speak specifically as of the date of this
Agreement or another date shall be true and correct as of such
date); and Acquiror shall have received a certificate signed on
behalf of Target by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Target to the foregoing effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of
Target. Target shall have performed in all
material respects all obligations required to be performed by it
under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, and
Acquiror shall have received a certificate signed on behalf of
Target by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of Target to such effect.
(c) Voting Agreements. Voting agreements,
substantially in the form of Exhibit A, attached
hereto, shall have been executed by Targets executive
officers and directors and shall be in full force and effect.
ARTICLE VIII.
TERMINATION
AND AMENDMENT
8.1 Termination. This Agreement may be
terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether
before or after approval of the Merger by the shareholders of
Target or Acquiror:
(a) by mutual consent of Acquiror and Target in a written
instrument, if the Board of Directors of each so determines by a
vote of a majority of the members of its respective entire Board
of Directors;
(b) by either Acquiror or Target, upon written notice to
the other party, if a Governmental Entity that must provide
Acquiror or Target with a Requisite Regulatory Approval has
denied approval of the Merger and such denial has become final
and non-appealable; or any Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction shall have issued an order, decree or ruling or
taken any other action permanently restraining, enjoining or
otherwise prohibiting the Merger, and such order, decree, ruling
or other action has become final and non-appealable; provided,
however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under this
A-34
Section 8.1(b) shall not be available to any party
whose failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement has
been the cause of, or resulted in, such action;
(c) by either Acquiror or Target, upon written notice to
the other party, if the Merger shall not have been consummated
on or before March 31, 2008; provided, however, that the
right to terminate this Agreement under this
Section 8.1(c) shall not be available to any party
whose failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement has
been the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the Effective
Time to occur on or before such date;
(d) by either Target or Acquiror (provided that the party
terminating shall not be in material breach of any of its
obligations under Section 6.3) if any approval of
the shareholders of Target or Acquiror required for the
consummation of the Merger shall not have been obtained upon a
vote taken thereon at a duly held meeting of such shareholders
or at any adjournment or postponement thereof;
(e) by either Acquiror or Target (provided that the
terminating party is not then in material breach of any
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained
herein) if there shall have been a breach of any of the
representations or warranties set forth in this Agreement by the
other party, which breach is not cured within thirty days
following written notice to the party committing such breach, or
which breach, by its nature, cannot be cured prior to the
Closing; provided, however, that neither party shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 8.1(e) unless the breach of representation
or warranty, together with all other such breaches, would
entitle the party receiving such representation not to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby under
Section 7.2(a) (in the case of a breach of a
representation or warranty by Acquiror) or
Section 7.3(a) (in the case of a breach of a
representation or warranty by Target );
(f) by either Acquiror or Target (provided that the
terminating party is not then in material breach of any
representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement contained
herein) if there shall have been a breach of any of the
covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement on the part
of the other party, which breach shall not have been cured
within thirty days following receipt by the breaching party of
written notice of such breach from the other party hereto, or
which breach, by its nature, cannot be cured prior to the
Closing; provided, however, that neither party shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 8.1(f) unless the breach of covenant,
together with all other such breaches, would entitle the party
entitled to the benefit of such covenant not to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby under
Section 7.2(b) (in the case of a breach of covenant
by Acquiror) or Section 7.3(b) (in the case of a
breach of covenant by Target );
(g) by either Acquiror or Target, if (i) the Board of
Directors of the other does not publicly recommend in the Joint
Proxy Statement that its shareholders approve and adopt this
Agreement, (ii) after recommending in the Joint Proxy
Statement that such shareholders approve and adopt this
Agreement, the Board of Directors of the other shall have
withdrawn, modified or amended such recommendation in any manner
adverse to the other party, or (iii) the other party
materially breaches its obligations under this Agreement by
reason of a failure to call a meeting of its shareholders or a
failure to prepare and mail to its shareholders the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus in accordance with Sections 6.1
and 6.3;
(h) by Acquiror, if the Board of Directors of Target has
authorized, recommended, proposed or publicly announced its
intention to authorize, recommend or propose any Acquisition
Proposal with any person other than Acquiror; or
(i) by Target upon the occurrence of both of the following
events: (i) the Average Closing Price (as defined below) is
less than $18.00 and (ii) (a) the number obtained by
dividing the Average Closing Price by the average of the per
share closing price of Acquiror Common Stock on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market for the ten (10) consecutive trading
days ending on (and including) the date hereof rounded to four
decimal places (the Acquiror Ratio) is less than
(b) the number obtained by dividing the Index Value (as
defined below) on the Determination Date by the Index Value on
the Starting Date rounded to four decimal places minus .25 (the
Index Ratio).
A-35
Average Closing Price means the average of
the per share closing prices of shares of Acquiror Common Stock
as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market for the ten
(10) consecutive full trading days ending on (and
including) the Determination Date.
Determination Date means that certain date
which is the eighth business day prior to the Closing Date.
Index Value on a given date shall mean the
closing index value for the NASDAQ Bank Index as reported by
Bloomberg, L.P.
Starting Date means the date of this
Agreement, or if the date of this Agreement is not a date on
which the Index Value is available (the Index Availability
Date), the value as of the Index Availability Date
immediately prior to the date of this Agreement.
8.2 Effect of Termination. In the event
of termination of this Agreement by either Target or Acquiror as
provided in Section 8.1, this Agreement shall
forthwith become void and there shall be no liability or
obligation on the part of Acquiror or Target or their respective
officers or directors, except (A) with respect to
Sections 6.2(b), 8.2, 8.3, 9.4,
and 9.10, which shall survive such termination
(B) with respect to any liabilities or damages incurred or
suffered by a party as a result of the willful and material
breach by the other party of any of its representations,
warranties, covenants or other agreements set forth in this
Agreement.
8.3 Termination Fee.
(a) Target shall pay Acquiror, by wire transfer of
immediately available funds, the sum of $8.0 million (the
Termination Fee) if this Agreement is terminated as
follows:
(i) if Acquiror shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.1(g) (as a result of Targets failure
to comply with the provisions of Section 8.1(g)) or
8.1(h), then Target shall pay the Termination Fee on the
business day following such termination;
(ii) if (A) either party shall terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(d) because the
required Target Shareholder Approval shall not have been
received and (B) at any time after the date of this
Agreement and at or before the Target Shareholders Meeting a
bona fide Acquisition Transaction, as defined below, shall have
been publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the Board
of Directors of Target (a Public Proposal) that has
not been withdrawn prior to such date and within six
(6) months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, Target or any of its Subsidiaries enters into a
definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, any
Acquisition Transaction, then Target shall pay the Termination
Fee on the date of such execution or consummation; and
(iii) if (A) either party shall terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(c) or Acquiror
shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 8.1(e) or (f), (B) at any time
after the date of this Agreement and before such termination
there shall have been a Public Proposal with respect to Target
that has not been withdrawn prior to such termination, and
(C) following the occurrence of such Public Proposal,
Target shall have intentionally breached (and not cured after
notice thereof) any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements set forth in this Agreement, which
breach shall have materially contributed to the failure of the
Effective Time to occur prior to the termination of this
Agreement and within six (6) months of the date of such
termination of this Agreement, Target or any of its Subsidiaries
enters into a definitive agreement with respect to, or
consummates, any Acquisition Transaction, then Target shall pay
the Termination Fee on the date of such execution or
consummation.
(b) If Target fails to pay the Termination Fee under
Section 8.3 on the dates specified, then Target
shall pay all costs and expenses (including legal fees and
expenses) incurred by Acquiror in connection with any action or
proceeding (including the filing of any lawsuit) taken by it to
collect such unpaid amounts, together with interest on such
unpaid amounts at the prime lending rate prevailing at such
time, as published in the Wall Street Journal, from the date
such amounts were required to be paid until the date actually
received by the other party.
A-36
(c) The parties acknowledge that the agreements contained
in Section 8.2 and 8.3 are an integral part
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
constitute liquidated damages and not a penalty, and that,
without these agreements, the parties would not have entered
into this Agreement.
(d) For purposes of this Agreement, the term
Acquisition Transaction shall mean (i) the
direct or indirect acquisition, purchase or assumption of all or
a substantial portion of the assets or deposits of Target,
(ii) the acquisition by any person of direct or indirect
beneficial ownership (including by way of merger, consolidation,
share exchange or otherwise) of 20% or more of the outstanding
shares of voting stock of Target, or (iii) a merger,
consolidation, business combination, liquidation, dissolution or
similar transaction of or involving Target, other than a merger,
business combination or similar transaction pursuant to which
persons who are shareholders of Target immediately prior to such
transaction own 60% or more of the voting stock of the surviving
entity (or parent thereof) immediately after consummation of
such transaction.
8.4 Amendment. Subject to compliance with
applicable law and Section 1.1(b), this Agreement
may be amended by the parties hereto, by action taken or
authorized by their respective Boards of Directors, at any time
before or after approval of the matters presented in connection
with the Merger by the shareholders of Target and Acquiror;
provided, however, that after any approval of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement by the respective
shareholders of Target or Acquiror, there may not be, without
further approval of such shareholders, any amendment of this
Agreement that changes the amount or the form of the
consideration to be delivered hereunder to the holders of Target
Common Stock, other than as contemplated by this Agreement. This
Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing
signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto.
8.5 Extension; Waiver. At any time prior
to the Effective Time, the parties hereto, by action taken or
authorized by their respective Board of Directors, may, to the
extent legally allowed, (a) extend the time for the
performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other
parties hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the
representations and warranties contained herein or in any
document delivered pursuant hereto and (c) waive compliance
with any of the agreements or conditions contained herein;
provided, however, that after any approval of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement by the respective
shareholders of Target or Acquiror, there may not be, without
further approval of such shareholders, any extension or waiver
of this Agreement or any portion thereof which reduces the
amount or changes the form of the consideration to be delivered
to the holders of Target Common Stock hereunder, other than as
contemplated by this Agreement. Any agreement on the part of a
party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only
if set forth in a written instrument signed on behalf of such
party, but such extension or waiver or failure to insist on
strict compliance with an obligation, covenant, agreement or
condition shall not operate as a waiver of, or estoppel with
respect to, any subsequent or other failure.
ARTICLE IX.
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
9.1 Closing. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, the closing of the Merger (the
Closing) will take place at 10:00 a.m.
on a date and at a place to be specified by the parties, which
shall be no later than the later of January 15, 2008, or
five business days after the satisfaction or waiver (subject to
applicable law) of the latest to occur of the conditions set
forth in Article VII hereof (other than those
conditions that by their nature or terms are to be satisfied or
waived at Closing), unless extended by mutual agreement of the
parties (the Closing Date).
9.2 Standard. No representation or
warranty of Target contained in Article IV or of
Acquiror contained in Article III shall be deemed
untrue or incorrect for any purpose under this Agreement, and no
party hereto shall be deemed to have breached a representation
or warranty for any purpose under this Agreement, in any case as
a consequence of the existence or absence of any fact,
circumstance or event unless such fact, circumstance or event,
individually or when taken together with all other facts,
circumstances or events inconsistent with any representations or
warranties contained in Article III, in the case of
Acquiror, or Article IV, in the case of Target, has
had or would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse
Effect with
A-37
respect to Acquiror or Target, respectively (disregarding for
purposes of this Section 9.2 any materiality or
Material Adverse Effect qualification contained in any
representations or warranties). Notwithstanding the immediately
preceding sentence, the representations and warranties contained
in Section 3.2(a), in the case of Acquiror , and
Section 4.2(a), in the case of Target, shall be
deemed untrue and incorrect if not true and correct in all
material respects.
9.3 Nonsurvival of Representations, Warranties and
Agreements. None of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement (other than the
Confidentiality Agreement, which shall terminate in accordance
with its terms) shall survive the Effective Time, except for
Section 1.10 and Section 6.8 and for
those other covenants and agreements contained herein and
therein which by their terms apply in whole or in part after the
Effective Time.
9.4 Expenses. All costs and expenses
incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such
expense; provided, however, that the costs and expenses
of printing and mailing the Proxy Statement, and all filing and
other fees paid to the SEC in connection with the Merger, shall
be borne equally by Target and Acquiror.
9.5 Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given if delivered personally, telecopied (with confirmation),
mailed by registered or certified mail (return receipt
requested) or delivered by an express courier (with
confirmation) to the parties at the following addresses (or at
such other address for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
if to Target, to:
|
|
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
7651 Highway 70 South
Nashville, TN 37221
Attn: Gary L. Scott
Facsimile: (615) 292-0337
|
|
Daniel W. Small
One Burton Hills Boulevard
Suite 330
Nashville, TN 37215
Facsimile:(615) 252-6001
|
(b)
|
|
if to Acquiror, to:
|
|
with a copy to:
|
|
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners,
Inc.
211 Commerce Street, Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37201
Attn: M. Terry Turner
Facsimile: (615) 744-3770
|
|
Bob F. Thompson
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
315 Deaderick Street, Suite 2700
Nashville, TN 37238
Facsimile: (615) 742-6262
|
9.6 Interpretation. When a reference is
made in this Agreement to Sections, Exhibits or Schedules, such
reference shall be to a Section of or Exhibit or Schedule to
this Agreement, unless otherwise indicated. The Disclosure
Schedules and each other Exhibit and Schedule shall be deemed
part of this Agreement and included in any reference to this
Agreement. The table of contents and headings contained in this
Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect
in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Whenever the words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. Whenever the singular or plural forms of any
word is used in this Agreement, such word shall encompass both
the singular and plural form of such word.
9.7 Counterparts. This Agreement may be
executed in counterparts, all of which shall be considered one
and the same agreement and shall become effective when
counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all
parties need not sign the same counterpart.
9.8 Entire Agreement. This Agreement
(including the documents and the instruments referred to herein)
constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.
9.9 Governing Law. This Agreement shall
be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Tennessee, without regard to any applicable conflicts
of law principles, except to the extent
A-38
mandatory provisions of federal law apply. Any legal action or
proceeding with respect to this Agreement against any party
shall be brought only in a court of record of, or in any federal
court located in, Davidson County in the State of Tennessee,
which shall have exclusive jurisdiction and venue for such
purpose. By execution and delivery of this Agreement, the
parties hereby accept for themselves, and in respect of their
property, generally and unconditionally, the jurisdiction and
venue of the aforesaid courts sitting in Davidson County,
Tennessee, and waive any objection to the laying of venue on the
grounds of forum non convenience which they may now or hereafter
have to the bringing or maintaining of any such action or
proceeding in such jurisdiction.
9.10 Publicity. Except as otherwise
required by applicable law or the rules of the NASDAQ, neither
Target nor Acquiror shall, or shall permit any of its
Subsidiaries to, issue or cause the publication of any press
release or other public announcement with respect to, or
otherwise make any public statement concerning, the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement without the prior consent of
Acquiror, in the case of a proposed announcement or statement by
Target, or Target, in the case of a proposed announcement or
statement by Acquiror, which consents shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed.
9.11 Assignment; Third Party
Beneficiaries. Neither this Agreement nor any of
the rights, interests or obligations shall be assigned by any of
the parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise)
without the prior written consent of the other parties. Subject
to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon,
inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and
their respective successors and assigns. Except as otherwise
specifically provided in Section 6.8, this Agreement
(including the documents and instruments referred to herein) is
not intended to confer upon any person other than the parties
hereto any rights or remedies hereunder.
9.12 Specific Performance. The parties
hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event
that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed
in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise
breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be
entitled to an injunction or injunction to prevent breaches of
this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and
provisions hereof in any court of the United States or any state
having jurisdiction, this being in addition to any other remedy
to which they are entitled at law or in equity; provided,
however, that Acquiror shall not be entitled to the remedies of
this Section 9.12 in the event that the fee provided for in
Section 8.3 is paid to Acquiror.
A-39
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this
instrument to be executed and delivered as of the day and year
first above written, such execution having been duly authorized
by the respective Board of Directors of Acquiror and Target.
|
|
|
|
|
ACQUIROR.:
|
|
|
|
Attest:
|
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hugh
M. Queener
|
|
|
Secretary, Hugh M. Queener
|
|
Name: M.
Terry Turner
|
|
|
Title: President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
TARGET:
|
|
|
|
Attest:
|
|
Mid-America Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
S. Short
|
|
|
Secretary, James S. Short
|
|
Name: Gary
L. Scott
|
|
|
Title: Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
A-40
TENNESSEE
DISSENTERS RIGHTS STATUTE
CHAPTER 23
DISSENTERS RIGHTS
|
|
|
Part 1 Right
to Dissent and Obtain Payment for Shares
|
48-23-101.
|
|
Chapter definitions.
|
48-23-102.
|
|
Right to dissent.
|
48-23-103.
|
|
Dissent by nominees and beneficial
owners.
|
|
Part 2
Procedure for Exercise of Dissenters Rights
|
48-23-201.
|
|
Notice of dissenters rights.
|
48-23-202.
|
|
Notice of intent to demand payment.
|
48-23-203.
|
|
Dissenters notice.
|
48-23-204.
|
|
Duty to demand payment.
|
48-23-205.
|
|
Share restrictions.
|
48-23-206.
|
|
Payment.
|
48-23-207.
|
|
Failure to take action.
|
48-23-208.
|
|
After-acquired shares.
|
48-23-209.
|
|
Procedure if shareholder
dissatisfied with payment or offer.
|
|
Part 3
Judicial Appraisal of Shares
|
48-23-301.
|
|
Court action.
|
48-23-302.
|
|
Court costs and counsel fees.
|
B-1
PART 1
RIGHT TO DISSENT AND OBTAIN PAYMENT FOR SHARES
48-23-101.
Chapter definitions. As used in this chapter,
unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) Beneficial shareholder means the
person who is a beneficial owner of shares held by a nominee as
the record shareholder;
(2) Corporation means the issuer of the
shares held by a dissenter before the corporate action, or the
surviving or acquiring corporation by merger or share exchange
of that issuer;
(3) Dissenter means a shareholder who is
entitled to dissent from corporate action under
§ 48-23-102
and who exercises that right when and in the manner required by
part 2 of this chapter;
(4) Fair value, with respect to a
dissenters shares, means the value of the shares
immediately before the effectuation of the corporate action to
which the dissenter objects, excluding any appreciation or
depreciation in anticipation of the corporate action;
(5) Interest means interest from the
effective date of the corporate action that gave rise to the
shareholders right to dissent until the date of payment,
at the average auction rate paid on United States treasury bills
with a maturity of six (6) months (or the closest maturity
thereto) as of the auction date for such treasury bills closest
to such effective date;
(6) Record shareholder means the person
in whose name shares are registered in the records of a
corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of
the rights granted by a nominee certificate on file with a
corporation; and
(7) Shareholder means the record
shareholder or the beneficial shareholder.
48-23-102.
Right to Dissent. (a) A shareholder is
entitled to dissent from, and obtain payment of the fair value
of the shareholders shares in the event of, any of the
following corporate actions:
(1) Consummation of a plan of merger to which the
corporation is a party:
(A) If shareholder approval is required for the merger by
§ 48-21-104
or the charter and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the
merger; or
(B) If the corporation is a subsidiary that is merged with
its parent under
§ 48-21-105;
(2) Consummation of a plan of share exchange to which the
corporation is a party as the corporation whose shares will be
acquired, if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the plan;
(3) Consummation of a sale or exchange of all, or
substantially all, of the property of the corporation other than
in the usual and regular course of business, if the shareholder
is entitled to vote on the sale or exchange, including a sale in
dissolution, but not including a sale pursuant to court order or
a sale for cash pursuant to a plan by which all or substantially
all of the net proceeds of the sale will be distributed to the
shareholders within one (1) year after the date of sale;
(4) An amendment of the charter that materially and
adversely affects rights in respect of a dissenters shares
because it:
(A) Alters or abolishes a preferential right of the shares;
(B) Creates, alters, or abolishes a right in respect of
redemption, including a provision respecting a sinking fund for
the redemption or repurchase, of the shares;
(C) Alters or abolishes a preemptive right of the holder of
the shares to acquire shares or other securities;
(D) Excludes or limits the right of the shares to vote on
any matter, or to cumulate votes, other than a limitation by
dilution through issuance of shares or other securities with
similar voting rights; or
B-2
(E) Reduces the number of shares owned by the shareholder
to a fraction of a share, if the fractional share is to be
acquired for cash under
§ 48-16-104; or
(5) Any corporate action taken pursuant to a shareholder
vote to the extent the charter, bylaws, or a resolution of the
board of directors provides that voting or nonvoting
shareholders are entitled to dissent and obtain payment for
their shares.
(b) A shareholder entitled to dissent and obtain payment
for the shareholders shares under this chapter may not
challenge the corporate action creating the shareholders
entitlement unless the action is unlawful or fraudulent with
respect to the shareholder or the corporation.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), no
shareholder may dissent as to any shares of a security which, as
of the date of the effectuation of the transaction which would
otherwise give rise to dissenters rights, is listed on an
exchange registered under § 6 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or is a national market
system security, as defined in rules promulgated pursuant
to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
48-23-103.
Dissent by nominees and beneficial owners.
(a) A record shareholder may assert dissenters rights
as to fewer than all the shares registered in the record
shareholders name only if the record shareholder dissents
with respect to all shares beneficially owned by any one
(1) person and notifies the corporation in writing of the
name and address of each person on whose behalf the record
shareholder asserts dissenters rights. The rights of a
partial dissenter under this subsection are determined as if the
shares as to which the partial dissenter dissents and the
partial dissenters other shares were registered in the
names of different shareholders.
(b) A beneficial shareholder may assert dissenters
rights as to shares of any one (1) or more classes held on
the beneficial shareholders behalf only if the beneficial
shareholder:
(1) Submits to the corporation the record
shareholders written consent to the dissent not later than
the time the beneficial shareholder asserts dissenters
rights; and
(2) Does so with respect to all shares of the same class of
which the person is the beneficial shareholder or over which the
person has power to direct the vote.
PART 2
PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISE OF DISSENTERS RIGHTS
48-23-201.
Notice of dissenters rights. (a) If
proposed corporate action creating dissenters rights under
§ 48-23-102
is submitted to a vote at a shareholders meeting, the
meeting notice must state that shareholders are or may be
entitled to assert dissenters rights under this chapter
and be accompanied by a copy of this chapter.
(b) If corporate action creating dissenters rights
under
§ 48-23-102
is taken without a vote of shareholders, the corporation shall
notify in writing all shareholders entitled to assert
dissenters rights that the action was taken and send them
the dissenters notice described in
§ 48-23-203.
(c) A corporations failure to give notice pursuant to
this section will not invalidate the corporate action.
48-23-202.
Notice of intent to demand payment. (a) If
proposed corporate action creating dissenters rights under
§ 48-23-102
is submitted to a vote at a shareholders meeting, a
shareholder who wishes to assert dissenters rights must:
(1) Deliver to the corporation, before the vote is taken,
written notice of the shareholders intent to demand
payment for the shareholders shares if the proposed action
is effectuated; and
(2) Not vote the shareholders shares in favor of the
proposed action. No such written notice of intent to demand
payment is required of any shareholder to whom the corporation
failed to provide the notice required by
§ 48-23-201.
B-3
(b) A shareholder who does not satisfy the requirements of
subsection (a) is not entitled to payment for the
shareholders shares under this chapter.
48-23-203.
Dissenters notice. (a) If proposed
corporate action creating dissenters rights under
§ 48-23-102
is authorized at a shareholders meeting, the corporation
shall deliver a written dissenters notice to all
shareholders who satisfied the requirements of
§ 48-23-202.
(b) The dissenters notice must be sent no later than
ten (10) days after the corporate action was authorized by
the shareholders or effectuated, whichever is the first to
occur, and must:
(1) State where the payment demand must be sent and where
and when certificates for certificated shares must be deposited;
(2) Inform holders of uncertificated shares to what extent
transfer of the shares will be restricted after the payment
demand is received;
(3) Supply a form for demanding payment that includes the
date of the first announcement to news media or to shareholders
of the principal terms of the proposed corporate action and
requires that the person asserting dissenters rights
certify whether or not the person asserting dissenters
rights acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before that
date;
(4) Set a date by which the corporation must receive the
payment demand, which date may not be fewer than one
(1) nor more than two (2) months after the date the
subsection (a) notice is delivered; and
(5) Be accompanied by a copy of this chapter if the
corporation has not previously sent a copy of this chapter to
the shareholder pursuant to
§ 48-23-201.
48-23-204.
Duty to demand payment. (a) A shareholder
sent a dissenters notice described in
§ 48-23-203
must demand payment, certify whether the shareholder acquired
beneficial ownership of the shares before the date required to
be set forth in the dissenters notice pursuant to
§ 48-23-203(b)(3),
and deposit the shareholders certificates in accordance
with the terms of the notice.
(b) The shareholder who demands payment and deposits the
shareholders share certificates under subsection (a)
retains all other rights of a shareholder until these rights are
cancelled or modified by the effectuation of the proposed
corporate action.
(c) A shareholder who does not demand payment or deposit
the shareholders share certificates where required, each
by the date set in the dissenters notice, is not entitled
to payment for the shareholders shares under this chapter.
(d) A demand for payment filed by a shareholder may not be
withdrawn unless the corporation with which it was filed, or the
surviving corporation, consents thereto.
48-23-205.
Share restrictions. (a) The corporation may
restrict the transfer of uncertificated shares from the date the
demand for their payment is received until the proposed
corporate action is effectuated or the restrictions released
under
§ 48-23-207.
(b) The person for whom dissenters rights are
asserted as to uncertificated shares retains all other rights of
a shareholder until these rights are cancelled or modified by
the effectuation of the proposed corporate action.
48-23-206.
Payment. (a) Except as provided in
§ 48-23-208,
as soon as the proposed corporate action is effectuated, or upon
receipt of a payment demand, whichever is later, the corporation
shall pay each dissenter who complied with
§ 48-23-204
the amount the corporation estimates to be the fair value of
each dissenters shares, plus accrued interest.
(b) The payment must be accompanied by:
(1) The corporations balance sheet as of the end of a
fiscal year ending not more than sixteen (16) months before
the date of payment, an income statement for that year, a
statement of changes in shareholders equity for that year,
and the latest available interim financial statements, if any;
B-4
(2) A statement of the corporations estimate of the
fair value of the shares;
(3) An explanation of how the interest was calculated;
(4) A statement of the dissenters right to demand
payment under
§ 48-23-209; and
(5) A copy of this chapter if the corporation has not
previously sent a copy of this chapter to the shareholder
pursuant to
§ 48-23-201
or
§ 48-23-203.
48-23-207.
Failure to take action. (a) If the
corporation does not effectuate the proposed action that gave
rise to the dissenters rights within two (2) months
after the date set for demanding payment and depositing share
certificates, the corporation shall return the deposited
certificates and release the transfer restrictions imposed on
uncertificated shares.
(b) If, after returning deposited certificates and
releasing transfer restrictions, the corporation effectuates the
proposed action, it must send a new dissenters notice
under
§ 48-23-203
and repeat the payment demand procedure.
48-23-208.
After-acquired shares. (a) A corporation
may elect to withhold payment required by
§ 48-23-206
from a dissenter unless the dissenter was the beneficial owner
of the shares before the date set forth in the dissenters
notice as the date of the first announcement to news media or to
shareholders of the principal terms of the proposed corporate
action.
(b) To the extent the corporation elects to withhold
payment under subsection (a), after effectuating the proposed
corporate action, it shall estimate the fair value of the
shares, plus accrued interest, and shall pay this amount to each
dissenter who agrees to accept it in full satisfaction of the
dissenters demand. The corporation shall send with its
offer a statement of its estimate of the fair value of the
shares, an explanation of how the interest was calculated, and a
statement of the dissenters right to demand payment under
§ 48-23-209.
48-23-209.
Procedure if shareholder dissatisfied with payment or
offer. (a) A dissenter may notify the
corporation in writing of the dissenters own estimate of
the fair value of the dissenters shares and amount of
interest due, and demand payment of the dissenters
estimate (less any payment under
§ 48-23-206),
or reject the corporations offer under
§ 48-23-208
and demand payment of the fair value of the dissenters
shares and interest due, if:
(1) The dissenter believes that the amount paid under
§ 48-23-206
or offered under
§ 48-23-208
is less than the fair value of the dissenters shares or
that the interest due is incorrectly calculated;
(2) The corporation fails to make payment under
§ 48-23-206
within two (2) months after the date set for demanding
payment; or
(3) The corporation, having failed to effectuate the
proposed action, does not return the deposited certificates or
release the transfer restrictions imposed on uncertificated
shares within two (2) months after the date set for
demanding payment.
(b) A dissenter waives the dissenters right to demand
payment under this section unless the dissenter notifies the
corporation of the dissenters demand in writing under
subsection (a) within one (1) month after the
corporation made or offered payment for the dissenters
shares.
PART 3
JUDICIAL APPRAISAL OF SHARES
48-23-301.
Court action. (a) If a demand for payment
under
§ 48-23-209
remains unsettled, the corporation shall commence a proceeding
within two (2) months after receiving the payment demand
and petition the court to determine the fair value of the shares
and accrued interest. If the corporation does not commence the
proceeding within the two-month period, it shall pay each
dissenter whose demand remains unsettled the amount demanded.
(b) The corporation shall commence the proceeding in a
court of record having equity jurisdiction in the county where
the corporations principal office (or, if none in this
state, its registered office) is located. If the
B-5
corporation is a foreign corporation without a registered office
in this state, it shall commence the proceeding in the county in
this state where the registered office of the domestic
corporation merged with or whose shares were acquired by the
foreign corporation was located.
(c) The corporation shall make all dissenters (whether or
not residents of this state) whose demands remain unsettled,
parties to the proceeding as in an action against their shares
and all parties must be served with a copy of the petition.
Nonresidents may be served by registered or certified mail or by
publication as provided by law.
(d) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding
is commenced under subsection (b) is plenary and exclusive.
The court may appoint one (1) or more persons as appraisers
to receive evidence and recommend decision on the question of
fair value. The appraisers have the powers described in the
order appointing them, or in any amendment to it. The dissenters
are entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other
civil proceedings.
(e) Each dissenter made a party to the proceeding is
entitled to judgment:
(1) For the amount, if any, by which the court finds the
fair value of the dissenters shares, plus accrued
interest, exceeds the amount paid by the corporation; or
(2) For the fair value, plus accrued interest, of the
dissenters after-acquired shares for which the corporation
elected to withhold payment under
§ 48-23-208.
48-23-302.
Court costs and counsel fees. (a) The court
in an appraisal proceeding commenced under
§ 48-23-301
shall determine all costs of the proceeding, including the
reasonable compensation and expenses of appraisers appointed by
the court. The court shall assess the costs against the
corporation, except that the court may assess costs against all
or some of the dissenters, in amounts the court finds equitable,
to the extent the court finds the dissenters acted arbitrarily,
vexatiously, or not in good faith in demanding payment under
§ 48-23-209.
(b) The court may also assess the fees and expenses of
counsel and experts for the respective parties, in amounts the
court finds equitable against:
(1) The corporation and in favor of any or all dissenters
if the court finds the corporation did not substantially comply
with the requirements of part 2 of this chapter; or
(2) Either the corporation or a dissenter, in favor of any
other party, if the court finds that the party against whom the
fees and expenses are assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously,
or not in good faith with respect to the rights provided by this
chapter.
(c) If the court finds that the services of counsel for any
dissenter were of substantial benefit to other dissenters
similarly situated, and that the fees for those services should
not be assessed against the corporation, the court may award to
these counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts
awarded to the dissenters who were benefited.
B-6
August 15, 2007
Board of Directors
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
211 Commerce Street
Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37201
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle) and
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
(Mid-America)
have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
August 15, 2007 (the Agreement), pursuant to
which
Mid-America
will merge with and into Pinnacle, with Pinnacle as the
surviving entity (the Merger). Pursuant to the terms
of the Agreement, upon consummation of the Merger, each share of
Mid-America
common stock issued and outstanding, subject to certain
exceptions as specified in the Agreement, will be eligible to
receive 0.4655 shares of Pinnacle common stock (the
Stock Consideration) and $1.50 in cash (the
Cash Consideration and together with the Stock
Consideration, the Merger Consideration). Cash will
be paid in lieu of any fractional shares. Capitalized terms used
herein without definition shall have the meanings assigned to
them in the Agreement. The other terms and conditions of the
Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement. You have
requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, of the Merger Consideration to Pinnacle.
Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P., as part of its
investment banking business, is regularly engaged in the
valuation of financial institutions and their securities in
connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate
transactions. In connection with this opinion, we have reviewed,
among other things: (i) the Agreement; (ii) certain
publicly available financial statements and other historical
financial information of Pinnacle that we deemed relevant;
(iii) certain publicly available financial statements and
other historical financial information of
Mid-America
that we deemed relevant; (iv) internal financial
projections for Pinnacle for the years ending December 31,
2007 through December 31, 2011; (v) estimated
financial projections for
Mid-America
for the years ending December 31, 2007 through
December 31, 2011 as provided by and reviewed with senior
management of Pinnacle; (vi) the pro forma financial impact
of the Merger on Pinnacle, based on assumptions relating to
transaction expenses, purchase accounting adjustments and cost
savings determined by the senior management of Pinnacle;
(vii) the publicly reported historical price and trading
activity for Pinnacles common stock; (viii) a
comparison of certain selected financial and stock market
information for Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and similar publicly available information for certain other
companies the securities of which are publicly traded;
(ix) the financial terms of certain recent business
combinations in the commercial banking industry, to the extent
publicly available; (x) the current market environment
generally and the banking environment in particular; and
(xi) such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
as we considered relevant. We also discussed with certain
members of senior management of Pinnacle, the business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects of both
Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
C-1
In performing our review, we have relied upon the accuracy and
completeness of all of the financial and other information that
was available to us from public sources or that was provided to
us by Pinnacle and
Mid-America
or their respective representatives and have assumed such
accuracy and completeness for purposes of rendering this
opinion. We have further relied on the assurances of management
of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would
make any of such information inaccurate or misleading. We have
not been asked to and have not undertaken an independent
verification of any of such information and we do not assume any
responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness
thereof. We did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal
of the specific assets, the collateral securing the assets or
the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
or any of their subsidiaries, or the collectibility of any such
assets, nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations or
appraisals. We did not make an independent evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
nor have we reviewed any individual credit files relating to
Pinnacle and
Mid-America.
We have assumed, with your consent, that the respective
allowances for loan losses for both Pinnacle and
Mid-America
are adequate to cover such losses.
With respect to the internal financial projections for Pinnacle
as provided by and discussed with the senior management of
Pinnacle and the financial projections for
Mid-America
as provided by and discussed with the senior management of
Pinnacle and used by us in our analyses, Pinnacles
management confirmed to us that they reflected the best
currently available estimates and judgments of such management
of the respective future financial performances of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and we assumed that such performances would be achieved. With
respect to the projections of transaction expenses, purchase
accounting adjustments and cost savings that were determined by
and reviewed with the senior management of Pinnacle, management
confirmed to us that they reflected the best currently available
estimates and judgments of such management and we assumed that
such performances would be achieved. We express no opinion as to
such financial projections or the assumptions on which they are
based. We have also assumed that there has been no material
change in Pinnacles or
Mid-Americas
assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or
prospects since the date of the most recent financial statements
made available to us. We have assumed in all respects material
to our analysis that Pinnacle and
Mid-America
will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to our
analyses, that all of the representations and warranties
contained in the Agreement and all related agreements are true
and correct, that each party to the agreements will perform all
of the covenants required to be performed by such party under
the agreements, that the conditions precedent in the agreements
are not waived. Finally, with your consent, we have relied upon
the advice Pinnacle has received from its legal, accounting and
tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters
relating to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the Agreement.
Our opinion is necessarily based on financial, economic, market
and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made
available to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after
the date hereof could materially affect this opinion. We have
not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw this
opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the
date hereof. We are expressing no opinion herein as to what the
value of Pinnacles common stock will be when issued to
Mid-Americas
shareholders pursuant to the Agreement or the prices at which
Pinnacles common stock may trade at any time.
We have acted as Pinnacles financial advisor in connection
with the Merger and will receive a fee for our services, the
majority of which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger.
Pinnacle has also agreed to indemnify us against certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement.
In the ordinary course of our business as a broker-dealer, we
may purchase securities from and sell securities to Pinnacle and
Mid-America
and their affiliates. We may also actively trade the equity or
debt securities of Pinnacle and
Mid-America
or their affiliates for our own account and for the accounts of
our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or
short position in such securities.
Our opinion is directed to the Board of Directors of Pinnacle in
connection with its consideration of the Merger and is directed
only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
Merger Consideration to Pinnacle and does not address the
underlying business decision of Pinnacle to engage in the
Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any
other alternative business strategies that might exist for
C-2
Pinnacle or the effect of any other transaction in which
Pinnacle might engage. Our opinion is not to be quoted or
referred to, in whole or in part, in a registration statement,
prospectus, proxy statement or in any other document, nor shall
this opinion be used for any other purposes, without our prior
written consent.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion, as
of the date hereof, that the Merger Consideration is fair to
Pinnacle from a financial point of view.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.
C-3
August 15, 2007
Board of Directors
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.
7639 Highway 70 South
Nashville, TN 37221
Dear Members of the Board:
We understand that
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (Target),
and Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., a Tennessee corporation
(Acquiror), are about to enter into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, to-be-dated on or about August 15, 2007
(the Agreement), pursuant to which Target will be
merged with and into Acquiror, with Acquiror remaining as the
surviving corporation (the Merger). In connection
with the Agreement and the Merger, you have requested Hovde
Financial Inc.s (Hovde) opinion as to whether
the Merger Consideration to be paid to the shareholders of
Target pursuant to the Agreement is fair from a financial point
of view. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the same meaning attributed to them in the Agreement.
Descriptions of the Merger and the Merger Consideration
contained herein shall be qualified in their entirety by
reference to the Agreement.
Pursuant to the Agreement, and subject to the terms and
conditions contained therein, in connection with the Merger, at
the Effective Time, each share of Target Common Stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be
converted into the right to receive (i) 0.4655 shares
of Acquiror Common Stock (the Stock Consideration)
and (ii) $1.50 in cash, without interest (the Cash
Consideration; together with the Stock Consideration, the
Merger Consideration).
Hovde, as part of its investment banking business, is
continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive bidding, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other
purposes. We are familiar with Target, having acted as its
financial advisor in connection with, and having participated in
the negotiations leading to, the Agreement.
We will receive compensation from Target in connection with our
services, a significant portion of which is contingent upon
consummation of the Merger. Target has agreed to indemnify us
for certain liabilities which may arise out of our engagement.
During the course of our engagement and for the purposes of the
opinion set forth herein, we have:
(i) reviewed the Agreement;
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
reviewed certain historical publicly available business and
financial information concerning Target and Acquiror;
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning Target;
|
(iv) analyzed certain financial projections prepared by the
managements of Target and Acquiror;
D-1
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
held discussions with members of the senior managements of
Target and Acquiror for the purpose of reviewing the future
prospects of Target and Acquiror, including financial forecasts
related to the respective businesses, earnings, assets,
liabilities and the amount and timing of cost savings (the
Synergies) expected to be achieved as a result of
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
|
(vi)
|
reviewed historical market prices and trading volumes of
Acquiror Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
|
(vii)
|
reviewed the terms of recent merger and acquisition
transactions, to the extent publicly available, involving banks,
thrifts and bank and thrift holding companies that we considered
relevant;
|
|
|
|
|
(viii)
|
evaluated the pro forma ownership of the Acquiror Common Stock
by the shareholders of Target relative to the pro forma
contribution of the Targets assets, liabilities, equity
and earnings to the combined company;
|
|
|
|
|
(ix)
|
analyzed the pro forma impact of the Merger on the combined
companys earnings per share, consolidated capitalization
and financial ratios; and
|
(x) performed such other analyses and considered such other
factors as we have deemed appropriate.
We also took into account our assessment of general economic,
market and financial conditions and our experience in other
transactions as well as our knowledge of the banking industry
and our general experience in securities valuations.
In rendering this opinion, we have assumed, without independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of the financial and
other information and representations contained in the materials
provided to us by Target and Acquiror and in the discussions
with the managements of Target and Acquiror. In that regard, we
have assumed that the financial forecasts, including, without
limitation, the Synergies and projections regarding
under-performing and nonperforming assets and net charge-offs
have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best
currently available information and judgments and estimates of
Target and Acquiror and that such forecasts will be realized in
the amounts and at the times contemplated thereby. We are not
experts in the evaluation of loan and lease portfolios for
purposes of assessing the adequacy of the allowances for losses
with respect thereto and have assumed that such allowances for
Target and Acquiror are in the aggregate adequate to cover such
losses. We were not retained to and did not conduct a physical
inspection of any of the properties or facilities of Target,
Acquiror or their respective subsidiaries. In addition, we have
not reviewed individual credit files nor have we made an
independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets and
liabilities of Target, Acquiror or any of their respective
subsidiaries and we were not furnished with any such evaluations
or appraisals.
We have assumed that the Merger will be consummated
substantially in accordance with the terms set forth in the
Agreement. We have further assumed that the Merger will be
accounted for as a purchase under generally accepted accounting
principles. We have assumed that the Merger is, and will be, in
compliance with all laws and regulations that are applicable to
Target, Acquiror and their respective subsidiaries. In rendering
this opinion, we have assumed that there are no factors that
would impede any necessary regulatory or governmental approval
of the Merger and we have further assumed that, in the course of
obtaining the necessary regulatory and governmental approvals,
no restriction will be imposed on Acquiror or the surviving
corporations that would have a material adverse effect on the
surviving corporation or the contemplated benefits of the
Merger. We have also assumed that no change in applicable law or
regulation would occur that would cause a material adverse
change in the prospects or operations of Acquiror or any of the
surviving corporations after the Merger.
Our opinion is based solely upon the information available to us
and the economic, market and other circumstances, as they exist
as of the date hereof. Events occurring and information that
becomes available after the date hereof could materially affect
the assumptions and analyses used in preparing this opinion. We
have not undertaken to reaffirm or revise this opinion or
otherwise comment upon any events occurring or information that
becomes available after the date hereof, except as otherwise
agreed in our engagement letter.
D-2
We are not expressing any opinion herein as to the prices at
which shares of Acquiror Common Stock issued in the Merger may
trade if and when they are issued or at any future time, nor
does our opinion constitute a recommendation to any holder of
Target Common Stock as to how such holder should vote with
respect to the Agreement at any meeting of holders of Target
Common Stock.
This letter is solely for the information of the Board of
Directors of Target and is not to be used, circulated, quoted or
otherwise referred to for any other purpose, nor is it to be
filed with, included in or referred to in whole or in part in
any registration statement, proxy statement or any other
document, except in each case in accordance with our prior
written consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld;
provided, however, that we hereby consent to the inclusion and
reference to this letter in any registration statement, proxy
statement, information statement or tender offer document to be
delivered to the holders of Target Common Stock in connection
with the Merger if and only if this letter is quoted in full or
attached as an exhibit to such document and this letter has not
been withdrawn prior to the date of such document.
Subject to the foregoing and based on our experience as
investment bankers, our activities and assumptions as described
above, and other factors we have deemed relevant, we are of the
opinion as of the date hereof that the consideration received by
the holders of Target Common Stock is fair, from a financial
point of view, to Target and the holders of Target Common Stock.
Sincerely,
/s/ Hovde Financial, Inc.
HOVDE FINANCIAL, INC.
D-3
FOURTH
AMENDMENT TO PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and shareholders of Pinnacle
Financial Partners, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (the
Company), have previously adopted the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan (the Plan);
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and shareholders have previously
adopted Amendments No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 to the
Plan;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.1 of the Plan, the
Companys Board of Directors has retained the right to
amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Companys Board of Directors now desires to
amend the Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and by
resolution of the Companys Board of Directors, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows:
1. The first sentence of Section 4.1 is deleted in its
entirety and replaced with the following:
Subject to the provisions of Section 4.2 hereof, the
stock to be subject to Awards under the Plan shall be the Shares
of the Company and the maximum number of Shares with respect to
which Awards may be granted under the Plan shall be 1,779,510
which includes 29,510 shares with respect to awards which
were authorized but not granted under the Pinnacle Financial
Partners, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2000
Plan).
2. Except as expressly stated herein, all other portions of
the Plan remain in full force and effect.
3. This Fourth Amendment to the Pinnacle Financial
Partners, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is effective
this day
of ,
2007; provided it has been approved by the Companys Board
of Directors and the Companys shareholders.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
E-1
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
The Tennessee Business Corporation Act (TBCA)
provides that a corporation may indemnify any of its directors
and officers against liability incurred in connection with a
proceeding if: (a) such person acted in good faith;
(b) in the case of conduct in an official capacity with the
corporation, he reasonably believed such conduct was in the
corporations best interests; (c) in all other cases,
he reasonably believed that his conduct was at least not opposed
to the best interests of the corporation; and (d) in
connection with any criminal proceeding, such person had no
reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. In actions
brought by or in the right of the corporation, however, the TBCA
provides that no indemnification may be made if the director or
officer was adjudged to be liable to the corporation. The TBCA
also provides that in connection with any proceeding charging
improper personal benefit to an officer or director, no
indemnification may be made if such officer or director is
adjudged liable on the basis that such personal benefit was
improperly received. In cases where the director or officer is
wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of
any proceeding instigated because of his or her status as a
director or officer of a corporation, the TBCA mandates that the
corporation indemnify the director or officer against reasonable
expenses incurred in the proceeding. The TBCA provides that a
court of competent jurisdiction, unless the corporations
charter provides otherwise, upon application, may order that an
officer or director be indemnified for reasonable expenses if,
in consideration of all relevant circumstances, the court
determines that such individual is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnification, notwithstanding the fact that
(a) such officer or director was adjudged liable to the
corporation in a proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation; (b) such officer or director was adjudged
liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly
received by him; or (c) such officer or director breached
his duty of care to the corporation.
The Registrants charter provides that the registrant will
indemnify its directors and officers to the maximum extent
permitted by the TBCA. The Registrants bylaws provide that
its directors and officers shall be indemnified against expenses
that they actually and reasonably incur if they are successful
on the merits of a claim or proceeding. In addition, the bylaws
provide that the Registrant will advance to its directors and
officers reasonable expenses of any claim or proceeding so long
as the director or officer furnishes the Registrant with
(1) a written affirmation of his or her good faith belief
that he or she has met the applicable standard of conduct and
(2) a written statement that he or she will repay any
advances if it is ultimately determined that he or she is not
entitled to indemnification.
When a case or dispute is settled or otherwise not ultimately
determined on its merits, the indemnification provisions provide
that the Registrant will indemnify its directors and officers
when they meet the applicable standard of conduct. The
applicable standard of conduct is met if the director or officer
acted in a manner he or she in good faith believed to be in or
not opposed to the Registrants best interests and, in the
case of a criminal action or proceeding, if the insider had no
reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The
Registrants board of directors, shareholders or
independent legal counsel determines whether the director or
officer has met the applicable standard of conduct in each
specific case.
The Registrants charter and bylaws also provide that the
indemnification rights contained therein bylaws do not exclude
other indemnification rights to which a director or officer may
be entitled under any bylaw, resolution or agreement, either
specifically or in general terms approved by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to
vote. The Registrant can also provide for greater
indemnification than is provided for in the bylaws if the
Registrant chooses to do so, subject to approval by its
shareholders and the limitations provided in the
Registrants charter as discussed in the subsequent
paragraph.
II-1
The Registrants charter eliminates, with exceptions, the
potential personal liability of a director for monetary damages
to the Registrant and its shareholders for breach of a duty as a
director. There is, however, no elimination of liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
a breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the
Registrant or its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
an act or omission not in good faith or which involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; or
|
|
|
|
any payment of a dividend or approval of a stock repurchase that
is illegal under the Tennessee Business Corporation Act.
|
The Registrants charter does not eliminate or limit the
Registrants right or the right of its shareholders to seek
injunctive or other equitable relief not involving monetary
damages.
The indemnification provisions of the bylaws specifically
provide that the Registrant may purchase and maintain insurance
on behalf of any director or officer against any liability
asserted against and incurred by him or her in his or her
capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent whether or
not the Registrant would have had the power to indemnify against
such liability.
|
|
Item 21.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) Exhibits. See Exhibit Index
(b) Financial Statement Schedules. Not Applicable
(c) Reports, Opinions or Appraisals. Opinions of Sandler
ONeill & Partners, L.P. and Hovde Financial,
Inc. (included as Appendix C and D, respectively, to the
joint proxy statement/prospectus that is Part I of this
registration statement).
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to file, during any
period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective
amendment to this registration statement: (i) to include
any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933; (ii) to reflect in the prospectus
any facts or events arising after the effective date of the
registration statement (or the most recent post-effective
amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate,
represent a fundamental change in the information in the
registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the
total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that
which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end
of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the
form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the
maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
Calculation of Registration Fee table in the
effective registration statement; (iii) to include any
material information with respect to the plan of distribution
not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any
material change to such information in the registration
statement.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for the
purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of
1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a
new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to remove from
registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the
securities being registered which remain unsold at the
termination of the offering.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes
of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933,
each filing of the Registrants annual report pursuant to
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the Registration
Statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the
II-2
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes as follows: that
prior to any public reoffering of the securities registered
hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part of this
Registration Statement, by any person or party who is deemed to
be an underwriter within the meaning of Rule 145(c), the
issuer undertakes that such reoffering prospectus will contain
the information called for by the applicable registration form
with respect to reofferings by persons who may be deemed
underwriters, in addition to the information called for by the
other items of the applicable form.
The Registrant undertakes that every prospectus: (i) that
is filed pursuant to the paragraph immediately preceding, or
(ii) that purports to meet the requirements of
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and is used
in connection with an offering of securities subject to
Rule 415, will be filed as part of an amendment to the
Registration Statement and will not be used until such amendment
is effective, and that, for purposes of determining any
liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such
post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to respond to
requests for information that is incorporated by reference into
the Prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13 of
this Form, within one business day of receipt of such request,
and to send the incorporated documents by first class mail or
other equally prompt means. This includes information contained
in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of the
Registration Statement through the date of responding to the
request.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to supply by means
of a post-effective amendment all information concerning a
transaction, and the company being acquired involved therein,
that was not the subject of and included in the Registration
Statement when it became effective.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Nashville, State of Tennessee, on
October 11, 2007.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
M. Terry Turner
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Robert
A. McCabe, Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M.
Terry Turner
M.
Terry Turner
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Harold
R. Carpenter
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Sue
R. Atkinson
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
James
C. Cope
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Gregory
L. Burns
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Colleen
Conway-Welch
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Clay
T. Jackson
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
William
H. Huddleston
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Ed
C. Loughry
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Hal
N. Pennington
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Dale
W. Polley
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
James
L. Shaub, II
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Reese
L. Smith, III
|
|
Director
|
|
October 11, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ M.
Terry Turner
M.
Terry Turner
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-5
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 15, 2007
between Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. and
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Appendix A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus that is
Part I of this registration statement) (schedules and
exhibits to which been omitted pursuant to Items 601(b)(2)
of Regulations S-K)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Charter of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. as amended
(restated for SEC electronic filing purposes only) (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 in the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005) (File
No. 000-31225)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. as amended (restated
for SEC electronic filing purposes only) (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 in the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002) (File
No. 000-31225)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by
reference to exhibit 4.1 in the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
See Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 for provisions of the Charter and
Bylaws defining rights of holders of the Registrants
Common Stock
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC regarding the
validity of the securities being registered*
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Form of opinion of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC to be
delivered at closing regarding material federal income tax
consequences relating to the merger
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Lease Agreement by and between TMP, Inc. (former name of
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.) and Commercial Street
Associates dated March 16, 2000 (main office) (incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018)).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Form of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.s
Organizers Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 2000 by and
between Pinnacle National Bank, Pinnacle Financial Partners,
Inc. and Robert A. McCabe, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference
to the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))**
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2000 by and
between Pinnacle National Bank, Pinnacle Financial Partners,
Inc. and Hugh M. Queener (incorporated herein by reference to
the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))**
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Letter Agreement dated March 14, 2000 and accepted
March 16, 2000 by and between Pinnacle Financial
Corporation (now known as Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.) and
Atkinson Public Relations (incorporated herein by reference to
the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2000 by and between
Pinnacle National Bank, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. and M.
Terry Turner (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))**
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))**
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.s Stock Option
Award (incorporated herein by reference to the Registrants
Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))**
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Agreement for Assignment of Lease by and between Franklin
National Bank and TMP, Inc., now known as Pinnacle Financial
Partners, Inc., effective July 17, 2000 (incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Form of Assignment of Lease and Consent of Landlord by Franklin
National Bank, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., formerly TMP,
Inc., and Stearns Investments, Jack J. Stearns and Edna Stearns,
General Partners (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form SB-2,
as amended (File
No. 333-38018))
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Green Hills Office Lease (incorporated herein by reference to
the Registrants
Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 as filed with
the SEC on March 29, 2001)
|
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)**
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)**
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Lease Agreement for West End Lease (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2005)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Lease Amendments for Commerce Street location (incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2005)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 19, 2005)**
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
2005 Annual Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005)**
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Commerce Street Lease (incorporated herein
by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Pinnacle National Bank and
Ed C. Loughry, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
as amended (File
No. 333-129076))**
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Pinnacle National Bank and
William S. Jones (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
as amended
(File No. 333-129076))**
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Consulting Agreement by and between Pinnacle National Bank and
Ronnie F. Knight (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-4,
as amended (File
No. 333-129076))**
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
2006 Director Compensation Summary (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 23, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for non-employee directors
(incorporated herein by reference to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 23, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the SEC on February 24, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
2006 Annual Cash Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 20, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 14, 2006 by and
among Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., Pinnacle National Bank
and Harold R. Carpenter (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 20, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Calvary Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended on September 30, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Calvary Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Option
Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended on September 30, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated
herein by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended on September 30, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 2000
Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended on September 30, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. 2004
Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to the
Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended on September 30, 2006)**
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
2007 Named Executive Officer Summary (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2007)**
|
II-7
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to the Registrants
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2007)**
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 21 in the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Maggart & Associates, P.C. (for
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc.)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP (for Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.)
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC (included in the
opinions filed as Exhibits 5.1 and 8.1 to this Registration
Statement)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney*
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Form of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. Proxy Card
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Form of
Mid-America
Bancshares, Inc. Proxy Card
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Opinion of Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.
(attached as Appendix C to the joint proxy statement/
prospectus which is part of this registration statement)
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Sandler ONeill & Partners, L.P.*
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
Opinion of Hovde Financial, Inc. (attached as Appendix D to
the joint proxy statement/ prospectus which is part of this
registration statement)
|
|
99
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Hovde Financial, Inc.*
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Management compensatory plan or arrangement |
II-8