e10vq
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-10684
International Game Technology
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
88-0173041 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9295 Prototype Drive
Reno, Nevada 89521
(Address of principal executive offices)
(775) 448-7777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
www.IGT.com
(Registrants website)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of May 3, 2007:
332,441,945 shares of common stock at $.00015625 par value
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
DEFINITIONS, abbreviations or acronyms as used in this Form 10-Q
|
|
|
Abbreviation |
|
Definition |
Acres
|
|
Acres Gaming Incorporated |
Anchor
|
|
Anchor Gaming |
APB
|
|
Accounting Principles Board |
APIC
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
AVP®
|
|
Advanced Video Platform |
bps
|
|
basis points |
CAD$
|
|
Canadian dollars |
CCSC
|
|
Colorado Central Station Casino |
CDS
|
|
central determination system |
CEO
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
CFO
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
1.75% Debentures
|
|
1.75% Zero-coupon Senior Convertible Debentures |
2.6% Debentures
|
|
2.6% Senior Convertible Debentures |
EITF
|
|
Emerging Issues Task Force |
EPA
|
|
Environmental Protection Agency |
EPS
|
|
earnings per share |
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FIN
|
|
FASB Interpretation |
GAAP
|
|
generally accepted accounting principles |
MDA
|
|
managements discussion & analysis |
MLP
|
|
multi level progressive |
M-P
|
|
multi-player |
NJ
|
|
New Jersey |
OSHA
|
|
Occupational Safety & Health Administration |
pp
|
|
percentage points |
R&D
|
|
research and development |
Reg
|
|
Regulation |
SAB
|
|
Staff Accounting Bulletin |
sbÔ
|
|
server based |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
SFAS
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SG&A
|
|
selling, general and administrative |
SIP
|
|
Stock Incentive Plan |
TRO
|
|
temporary restraining order |
UK
|
|
United Kingdom |
US
|
|
United States |
VCAT
|
|
Venture Catalyst Incorporated |
VIE
|
|
variable interest entity |
WAP
|
|
wide area progressive |
*
|
|
not meaningful (in table) |
ii
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
268.6 |
|
|
$ |
333.2 |
|
|
$ |
586.0 |
|
|
$ |
657.7 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
341.1 |
|
|
|
311.2 |
|
|
|
666.0 |
|
|
|
602.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
609.7 |
|
|
|
644.4 |
|
|
|
1,252.0 |
|
|
|
1,260.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
123.1 |
|
|
|
166.9 |
|
|
|
275.2 |
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
Cost of gaming operations |
|
|
130.1 |
|
|
|
127.3 |
|
|
|
268.3 |
|
|
|
253.5 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
87.2 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
|
185.5 |
|
|
|
177.7 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and operating expenses |
|
|
407.5 |
|
|
|
451.7 |
|
|
|
864.5 |
|
|
|
882.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
202.2 |
|
|
|
192.7 |
|
|
|
387.5 |
|
|
|
378.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax |
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
394.2 |
|
|
|
386.4 |
|
Income tax provisions |
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
145.0 |
|
|
|
141.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
244.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.130 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.260 |
|
|
$ |
0.250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
335.2 |
|
|
|
336.4 |
|
|
|
333.9 |
|
|
|
336.8 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
340.2 |
|
|
|
361.9 |
|
|
|
342.4 |
|
|
|
362.3 |
|
See accompanying notes.
1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions, except par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
335.3 |
|
|
$ |
294.6 |
|
Investment securities, at market value |
|
|
197.0 |
|
|
|
191.7 |
|
Restricted cash and investments |
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
102.8 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
354.8 |
|
|
|
353.1 |
|
Current maturities of notes and contracts receivable, net |
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
158.5 |
|
|
|
162.1 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,453.7 |
|
|
|
1,375.7 |
|
Notes and contracts receivable, net |
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
530.8 |
|
|
|
469.8 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
447.1 |
|
|
|
340.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
142.4 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
252.3 |
|
|
|
257.0 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
1,106.7 |
|
|
|
1,095.1 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
190.2 |
|
|
|
184.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,186.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,902.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of notes payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
632.4 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
118.9 |
|
|
|
115.5 |
|
Jackpot liabilities |
|
|
181.6 |
|
|
|
170.0 |
|
Accrued employee benefit plan liabilities |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
183.8 |
|
|
|
173.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
596.1 |
|
|
|
1,246.6 |
|
Notes payable, net of current maturities |
|
|
1,100.0 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Non-current jackpot liabilities |
|
|
478.2 |
|
|
|
376.7 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,212.8 |
|
|
|
1,860.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.00015625 par value; 1,280.0 shares authorized;
730.2 and 720.5 shares issued |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,993.3 |
|
|
|
1,864.2 |
|
Treasury stock at cost: 394.6 and 386.3 shares |
|
|
(2,966.4 |
) |
|
|
(2,603.6 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,936.6 |
|
|
|
2,774.9 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,973.8 |
|
|
|
2,042.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,186.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,902.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
244.6 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization, and asset charges |
|
|
131.5 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
Debt discounts and deferred issuance costs |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Bad debt provisions |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Inventory obsolescence |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
(Gain) loss on assets sold |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Property insurance gains |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding
acquisitions and VIE consolidations/deconsolidations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
(62.8 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(29.3 |
) |
Jackpot liabilities |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
Income taxes, net of employee stock plans |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
Other non-current assets |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from operations |
|
|
366.5 |
|
|
|
204.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(181.9 |
) |
|
|
(134.5 |
) |
Investment securities, net |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
52.9 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments, net |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Loans receivable cash advanced |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Loans receivable payments received |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Proceeds from assets sold |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Property insurance proceeds |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in restricted cash |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.0 |
) |
Business acquisitions |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from investing |
|
|
(178.0 |
) |
|
|
(106.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt repayments |
|
|
(638.0 |
) |
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
Debt proceeds |
|
|
886.7 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
Employee stock plan proceeds |
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(87.2 |
) |
|
|
(84.3 |
) |
Share repurchases |
|
|
(362.7 |
) |
|
|
(173.1 |
) |
Structured share repurchase transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from financing |
|
|
(146.4 |
) |
|
|
(109.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange rates effect on cash |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
Beginning cash and equivalents |
|
|
294.6 |
|
|
|
288.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
335.3 |
|
|
$ |
279.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
Supplemental Cash Flows Information
Depreciation, amortization, and asset charges reflected in the cash flows statements are
comprised of amounts presented separately on the income statements, plus depreciation,
amortization, and asset charges included in cost of product sales and cost of gaming operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
(673.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(271.5 |
) |
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
680.7 |
|
|
|
324.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections to fund jackpots |
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
72.5 |
|
Payments to winners |
|
|
(102.4 |
) |
|
|
(91.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in jackpot liabilities |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot annuity purchases |
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Jackpot annuity proceeds |
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net jackpot funding cash flows |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(77.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.0 |
) |
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
(95.3 |
) |
|
|
(101.7 |
) |
Intellectual property |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(181.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(134.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
156.0 |
|
|
|
148.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in capital expenditure accruals |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
Interest accretion for jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIE deconsolidations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
139.2 |
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIE reconsolidations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
$ |
122.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
122.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.75% Debentures converted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued including APIC |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities adjusted to APIC |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Our fiscal accounting periods end on the Saturday nearest the last day of the quarter end
month. For simplicity, we present all fiscal period endings as the calendar month end date.
Accordingly, this report presents the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period End |
|
|
Actual |
|
Presented as |
Current quarter |
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2007 |
Prior year quarter |
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
Prior fiscal year end |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with SEC requirements and
include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary to fairly present
consolidated results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for all periods presented.
Interim period results are not necessarily indicative of full year results This quarterly report
should be read in conjunction with our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of International Game Technology and all
majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities for which we are the
primary beneficiary. All appropriate inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated. For
investments in unconsolidated affiliates where we exercise significant influence, we use the equity
method of accounting.
Unconsolidated Affiliate
In February 2006, IGT paid $56.0 million for a 10% equity interest in Casino IP Holdings, LLC
(LLC), a variable interest entity formed to hold, develop, and license Walker Digitals
intellectual property identified for gambling use. IGT agreed to cooperatively develop and market
products expected to be integral to our operations, using certain LLC innovations. We are not the
primary beneficiary of the LLC and apply the equity method of accounting. Our net investment in
the LLC of $50.3 million is included in other non-current assets and represents our maximum
exposure to loss at March 31, 2007. We recognized a loss of $2.5 million for the six months ended
March 31, 2007, primarily related to the amortization of intangibles. As the loss is not material
to our financial statements, it is presented as a component of SG&A expense.
Consolidated WAP Trust VIEs
We initially consolidated our WAP trusts in Iowa and NJ beginning March 31, 2004 under FIN 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Prior to consolidation, we
recognized revenues from the trusts based on contractual fee arrangements. Consolidated trust
assets equal liabilities and relate primarily to jackpot funding. These VIE trust consolidations
increase gaming operations revenues and costs by approximately the same amount, resulting in no
material impact to gross profit or net income.
In November 2005, IGT assumed direct responsibility for current and future NJ WAP jackpot system
operations previously under the control of a third party trust administrator. At that time, IGT
was relieved of its contractual guarantee obligation related to the third party administration of
past winner payments. Accordingly, we ceased to consolidate approximately $139.2 million of NJ VIE
assets and liabilities related to past winners during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
In November 2006, IGT executed an agreement with casino trustees to assume responsibility for and
administration of the NJ past winner payments formerly under the control of a third party
administrator. The resulting reconsolidation of these VIE past winner trusts initially added
assets and equivalent liabilities of $122.8 million. Consolidated Iowa and NJ VIE trust assets and
equivalent liabilities totaled $121.6 million at March 31, 2007 and $4.1 million at September 30,
2006. Consolidated VIE trust revenues for the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 comprised
less than 0.1% of total revenues.
5
Hurricane Damage
We suffered damages and losses to our US Gulf Coast operations from the hurricanes in August and
September 2005, primarily affecting gaming operations machines destroyed or temporarily shutdown.
In March 2007, we negotiated a final insurance settlement totaling $18.0 million, recovering $6.0
million for gaming operations equipment damages and $12.0 million for business interruption. We
received a final payment of $13.0 million, net of a $5.0 million advance previously received in our
fiscal 2006 fourth quarter. We recorded a property insurance gain of $5.0 million to cost of
gaming operations, net of $1.0 million in insurance receivables previously accrued, and a $12.0
million business insurance gain included in SG&A.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
SFAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, permitting entities to elect fair value measurement for many financial
instruments and certain other items. Unrealized gains and losses on designated items will be
recognized in earnings at each subsequent period. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements for similar types of assets and liabilities measured at fair value. This
statement is effective for us beginning in October 2008. We are evaluating the potential impact of
adopting this statement that will depend on the nature and extent of eligible items elected for
fair value measurement.
SFAS 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on
how to measure fair value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the
information. This statement is effective for us beginning in October 2008. We are evaluating
whether adoption of this statement will result in changes to our fair value measurements.
SAB 108
In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 requires analysis of
misstatements using both an income statement (rollover) approach and a balance sheet (iron curtain)
approach in assessing materiality and provides for a one-time cumulative effect transition
adjustment effective for our fiscal year ending September 30, 2007. We do not expect the adoption
of this statement to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
FIN 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by
defining criteria that a tax position on an individual matter must meet before that position is
recognized in the financial statements. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on measurement,
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, interim period accounting, disclosures and
transition. This interpretation is effective for us beginning in October 2007. We are evaluating
the potential impact of adopting this interpretation on our future results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
2. Balance Sheet Components
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
87.5 |
|
|
$ |
79.9 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
158.5 |
|
|
$ |
162.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
35.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
104.6 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Machinery, furniture and equipment |
|
|
227.0 |
|
|
|
194.1 |
|
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
678.8 |
|
|
|
608.8 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
114.3 |
|
|
|
82.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,176.2 |
|
|
|
1,039.5 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(645.4 |
) |
|
|
(569.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
530.8 |
|
|
$ |
469.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in process includes $101.0 million at March 31, 2007 and $57.7 million at
September 30, 2006 related to our new facilities under construction in Las Vegas.
In March 2007, IGT sold a company airplane for $7.8 million to a limited liability company owned by
Chuck Mathewson, a former director and executive officer of IGT, and the father of Robert
Mathewson, a current IGT director. Robert Mathewson has no interest in the limited liability
company or in the airplane itself. IGT recognized a $5.8 million gain on sale, less $1.3 million
in repairs and maintenance required as a condition of the sale, for a realized net benefit of $4.5
million.
3. Share-based Compensation
Shares available for grant under the IGT Stock Incentive Plan totaled 10.8 million at March
31, 2007 and unrecognized share-based compensation costs totaled $88.2 million with an expected
weighted average life of 2.1 years. SIP grants in fiscal 2007 began vesting ratably over four
years and activity is reflected below as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Options |
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(millions) |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
17,553 |
|
|
$ |
26.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
42.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
20.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
31.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
35.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
17,180 |
|
|
$ |
28.58 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
207.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
9,182 |
|
|
$ |
24.55 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
146.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
Vesting |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Restricted Shares/Units |
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(millions) |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
$ |
33.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
42.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
32.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
36.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
35.17 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
4. Acquisitions
On December 21, 2006, we purchased Venture Catalyst Incorporated (VCAT), with the Mariposa
suite of gaming software products for $21.8 million. We anticipate the Mariposa casino systems
applications for customer relationship management will enhance our server-based initiatives. We
are not providing pro forma financial information for this acquisition, as it was not material to
our consolidated results. At March 31, 2007, the business valuation is not yet complete and we
preliminarily allocated the purchase price to:
|
ª |
|
tangible assets of $6.5 million, including cash of $3.5 million |
|
|
ª |
|
identifiable intangibles of $8.4 million |
|
|
ª |
|
in-process R&D of $0.1 million with no future alternative use, immediately charged to R&D expense |
|
|
ª |
|
goodwill of $9.6 million, not deductible for tax purposes |
|
|
ª |
|
liabilities of $2.8 million |
5. Allowances for Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful notes and contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
Long-term |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
$ |
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash or equivalents, short-term investments, and receivables. We place short-term
investments in high credit quality financial institutions or in short duration high quality
securities. With the exception of US Government and Agency securities, our investment policy
limits the amount of credit exposure in any one financial institution, industry group or type of
investment. Cash on deposit may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.
Our revenues and resulting receivables are concentrated in specific legalized gaming regions as
follows at March 31, 2007:
ª |
|
North America: Nevada20%, California11%, Oklahoma6%, jurisdictions under 5% individually41% |
|
ª |
|
International: Europe10%, Latin America5%, jurisdictions under 5% individually7% |
Subsequent to March 31, 2007,
IGT agreed to provide up to $120.0 million in
equipment notes and development financing loans to gaming operators
in Argentina. We also committed to fund approximately
$103.0 million in equity investments and convertible notes in a strategic business partner for
expansion in the Chinese video lottery market, subject to customary
closing conditions.
8
7. Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill
In accordance with EITF 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under
APB 25 and FIN 44, goodwill was adjusted for the tax benefit of Anchor options exercised subsequent
to acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity by Segment for the Six Months |
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
America |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
992.1 |
|
|
$ |
103.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,095.1 |
|
VCAT- Mariposa acquisition |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Tax benefit of Anchor options exercised |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
1,001.4 |
|
|
$ |
105.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,106.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangibles
Patent additions in the following table include capitalized legal costs. Business
combination additions include valuation adjustments subsequent to acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for the Six Months |
|
Business |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Weighted |
|
Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
Combinations |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Average Life |
|
(In millions, except life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years) |
|
Finite lived intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
10 |
|
Contracts |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite lived trademarks |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangibles |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Balances |
|
Cost |
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite lived intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
342.3 |
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
|
$ |
206.9 |
|
|
$ |
332.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
119.4 |
|
|
$ |
212.7 |
|
Contracts |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
420.0 |
|
|
|
168.3 |
|
|
|
251.7 |
|
|
|
407.8 |
|
|
|
|
150.8 |
|
|
|
257.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite lived trademarks |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
420.6 |
|
|
$ |
168.3 |
|
|
$ |
252.3 |
|
|
$ |
407.8 |
|
|
|
$ |
150.8 |
|
|
$ |
257.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense totaled $11.3 million in the current quarter versus $11.1 million in the
prior year quarter and $22.4 million in the six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated annual amortization |
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.1 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
35.1 |
|
9
8. Credit Facilities & Indebtedness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility |
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
Foreign credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
1.75% Convertible Debentures, net of unamortized discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
611.1 |
|
2.6% Convertible Debentures |
|
|
900.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable, net |
|
$ |
1,100.0 |
|
|
$ |
832.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to be in compliance with all applicable covenants at March 31, 2007.
Senior Credit Facility
Borrowings outstanding under our unsecured $2.5 billion revolving line of credit totaled $200.0
million at March 31, 2007, with $4.1 million reserved for letters of credit. Interest rates and
facility fees applicable to the credit facility may fluctuate based on our public credit ratings
and/or debt to capitalization ratio. At March 31, 2007, the interest rate was LIBOR plus 37.5 bps
or 5.72% with a facility fee of 12.5 bps.
Foreign Credit Facilities
Our available foreign credit facilities totaled $101.6 million with a weighted average interest
rate of 1.9% at March 31, 2007. Renewals on these facilities occur annually.
New 2.6% Senior Convertible Debentures
On December 20, 2006, we issued $900.0 million principal amount of 2.6% Senior Convertible
Debentures due December 15, 2036 in a private placement. We will pay interest on the Debentures
semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning June 15, 2007.
We may also pay contingent interest for the period commencing December 20, 2009 through June 14,
2010 and any six month period thereafter, if the average trading price (as defined in the
indenture) per $1,000 Debenture for the five trading day measurement period ending on the third
trading day immediately preceding the first day of the interest period equals 120% or more of an
equal principal amount of Debentures. The amount of contingent interest will equal 0.25% per annum
of the average trading price per $1,000 Debenture during the five trading day measurement period
used to determine whether contingent interest must be paid.
Under certain circumstances, each $1,000 Debenture will initially be convertible into 16.1875
shares of IGT Common Stock, representing a stock price of $61.78 or a 35% conversion premium over
the market price at issuance. Upon conversion, for each $1,000 Debenture, a holder will receive
cash up to $1,000 and shares for any excess conversion value determined in a manner set forth in
the indenture. We will adjust the conversion rate upon the occurrence of certain events as defined
in the indenture.
The Debentures are convertible under any of the following circumstances:
|
ª |
|
during any fiscal quarter ending after March 31, 2007 if the closing price of
our common stock is more than 130% of the conversion price during any measurement period
of the preceding fiscal quarter |
|
|
ª |
|
if the Debentures are called for redemption |
|
|
ª |
|
if specified corporate transactions occur |
|
|
ª |
|
during the last three months prior to maturity |
IGT may redeem some or all of the Debentures for cash on or after December 20, 2009, at 100% of
their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. If IGT redeems the Debentures,
holders will be notified at least 15 days, but not more than 60 days, prior to the redemption date.
Holders have the right to require IGT to redeem the Debentures for cash at 100% of their principal
amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on December 15, 2009, 2011, 2016, 2021, 2026 and
2031.
Under the Debenture Registration Rights Agreement, we agreed to file and keep effective a shelf
registration statement covering the resale of the Debentures and underlying common stock issuable
upon conversion for specified periods. Our registration statement on Form S-3 became effective on
March 9, 2007. If we fail to maintain an effective registration statement for the time periods
specified, subject to permitted exceptions, we will be required to pay additional interest as
liquidated damages ranging from 0.25% to 0.50% of the principal amount to Debenture holders until
any default under the Registration Rights Agreement is cured.
10
In evaluating all features of our 2.6% Debentures for SFAS 133 embedded derivatives, we determined
the contingent interest feature represents an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation as it is
based on the market price of the debentures. The value of this derivative was nominal at issuance
and March 31, 2007, as such, we recorded no related derivative asset or liability at March 31,
2007. Any derivative value would be recorded as a liability and adjusted through interest expense
for changes in fair value.
Old 1.75% Zero-Coupon Debentures
On December 26, 2006, our outstanding 1.75% Debentures were called for redemption. The call of the
Debentures gave holders the right to convert their Debentures before January 10, 2007, and receive
aggregate consideration comprised of shares and cash under the terms of the applicable indentures.
In conjunction with the redemption and related conversions, we paid holders $612.7 million, issued
7.3 million shares and recorded a deferred tax adjustment to APIC for $47.3 million.
9. Earnings Per Share Reconciliation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
244.6 |
|
After-tax interest expense on 1.75% Debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Numerator |
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
125.9 |
|
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
248.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
335.2 |
|
|
|
336.4 |
|
|
|
333.9 |
|
|
|
336.8 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock awards |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Dilutive effect of 1.75% Debentures |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Denominator |
|
|
340.2 |
|
|
|
361.9 |
|
|
|
342.4 |
|
|
|
362.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average antidilutive stock award
shares excluded from diluted EPS |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
We repurchased 3.5 million additional shares or 1% of outstanding shares between March 31,
2007 and May 3, 2007.
10. Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes is based on estimated effective annual income tax rates. The
provision differs from income taxes currently payable because certain items of income and expense
are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes.
We reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
11. Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
244.6 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Investment securities unrealized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
128.7 |
|
|
$ |
125.2 |
|
|
$ |
253.0 |
|
|
$ |
245.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
12. Contingencies
Litigation
IGT has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. We do not
expect the outcome of these suits, including the lawsuits described below, to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position or results of future operations.
Bally
On December 7, 2004, IGT filed a complaint in US District Court for the District of Nevada,
alleging that defendants Alliance Gaming Corp., Bally Gaming Intl, Inc., and Bally Gaming, Inc.
infringed six US patents held by IGT, US Patent numbers 6,827,646; 5,848,932; 5,788,573; 5,722,891;
6,712,698 and 6,722,985. On January 21, 2005, defendants filed an answer denying the allegations
in the complaint and raising various affirmative defenses to IGTs asserted claims. Defendants
also asserted fourteen counterclaims against IGT, including counterclaims for a declaratory
judgment of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability of the asserted patents, and for
antitrust violations and intentional interference with prospective business advantage. IGT has
successfully moved for partial summary judgment on defendants counterclaims for intentional
interference with prospective business advantage and defendants antitrust allegations related to
the gaming machine market. IGT denies the remaining allegations, and discovery is ongoing.
On April 28, 2006, IGT filed a complaint in US District Court for the District of Delaware,
alleging that defendants Bally Technologies, Inc., Bally Gaming Intl, Inc., and Bally Gaming, Inc.
infringed nine US patents held by IGT, US Patent numbers RE 38,812; RE 37,885; 6,832,958;
6,319,125; 6,244,958; 6,431,983; 6,607,441; 6,565,434; and 6,620,046. The complaint alleges that
the BALLY POWER BONUSING technology infringes one or more of the claims of the asserted IGT
patents. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages and an injunction. On June 30, 2006, defendants filed
an answer denying the allegations in the complaint and raising various affirmative defenses to
IGTs asserted claims. Defendants also asserted twelve counterclaims against IGT, including
counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, unenforceability of the
asserted patents, antitrust violations, unfair competition, and intentional interference with
prospective business advantage. IGT denies these allegations, and discovery is ongoing.
On September 5, 2006, Bally Gaming, Inc. filed a complaint in US District Court for the District of
Nevada alleging that IGT is infringing US Patent No. 7,100,916, entitled Indicator Wheel System.
The products named in the complaint are IGTs gaming machines with wheel features, including,
without limitation, Wheel of Fortune®, Wheel of Gold, The Addams Family, American Bandstand, The
Apprentice, Dilbert Wheelbert, Drew Carey Great Balls of Cash, Elvira®, I Dream of Jeannie®, I
Love Lucy®, Indiana Jones: Raiders of the Lost Ark, M*A*S*H*, Megabucks® with Morgan Fairchild,
Regis On the Town, Sinatra and The Twilight Zone® gaming machines. The lawsuit seeks
unspecified monetary damages and an injunction. On October 6, 2006, IGT filed an answer and
counterclaims denying infringement and seeking a declaration that the patent is invalid and
non-infringed. IGT intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. Discovery is ongoing.
Aristocrat
On June 30, 2005, Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ltd. filed a patent infringement lawsuit
against IGT. The Complaint was served on IGT on December 13, 2005. Aristocrat alleges that IGT
has willfully infringed
US Patent No. 6,093,102. Aristocrat contends that the patent covers its Reel Power® video slot
technology and IGTs Multiway® video slot games. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and an
injunction. On January 13, 2006, Aristocrat filed a First Amended Complaint adding Aristocrat
Technologies, Inc. as a plaintiff. On January 19, 2006, IGT filed its Answer to the First Amended
Complaint. On April 20, 2007, the US District Court for the District of Nevada entered an order
granting summary judgment in favor of IGT and declaring the Aristocrat patent invalid. Summary
judgment was entered for IGT on April 23, 2007. On May 1, 2007, Aristocrat requested the US Court
alter or amend the summary judgment to make finality clear so that Aristocrat can appeal the
decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
On June 12, 2006, Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ltd. and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
filed a patent infringement lawsuit against IGT. Aristocrat alleges that IGT has willfully
infringed US Patent No. 7,056,215, which issued on June 6, 2006. The IGT products named in the
complaint are the Fort Knox® mystery progressive slot machines. IGT believes that the patent is
invalid and not infringed and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Brochu v. Loto Quebec
Loto Quebec commenced an action in warranty against VLC, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of IGT,
and another manufacturer of video lottery machines in October 2003, in the Superior Court of the
Province of Quebec, District of Quebec, seeking indemnification for any damages that may be awarded
against Loto Quebec in a class action suit, also filed in the Superior Court of the Province of
Quebec. The class action claim
12
against Loto Quebec, to which neither IGT nor any of its affiliates are parties, was filed by Jean
Brochu on behalf of himself and a class of other persons who allegedly developed pathological
behaviors through the play of video lottery machines made available by Loto Quebec in taverns and
other public locations. In this action, plaintiff seeks to recover on behalf of the class damages
of approximately CAD$578.7 million, representing CAD$4,863 per class member, and CAD$119.0 million
in punitive damages. Loto Quebec filed its Plea in Defense in the main action in February 2006.
The Court scheduled trial of the entire action against Loto Quebec to commence later in 2007.
Environmental Matters
CCSC, a casino operation sold by IGT in April 2003, is located in an area that has been designated
by the EPA as an active superfund site because of contamination from historic mining activity in
the area. In order for Anchor Coin, an entity we acquired in December 2001, to develop the CCSC
site, it voluntarily entered into an administrative order on consent with the EPA to conduct soil
removal and analysis (a requirement imposed on similarly situated property developers within the
region) in conjunction with re-routing mine drainage. The work and obligations contemplated by the
agreement were completed by Anchor in June 1998, and the EPA subsequently issued a termination of
the order.
The EPA, together with other property developers excluding the CCSC, continue remediation
activities at the site. While we believe our remediation obligations are complete, it is possible
that additional contamination may be identified and we could be obligated to participate in
remediation efforts. Under the guidance in Statement of Position 96-1, Environmental Remediation
Liabilities, we determined the incurrence of additional remediation costs is neither probable nor
reasonably estimable and no liability is recorded at this time.
Miller
In June 2003, a class action lawsuit was filed in Clark County, Nevada, District Court against
Acres and its directors, entitled Paul Miller v. Acres Gaming Incorporated, et al. The complaint
alleged that Acres directors breached their fiduciary duties to their stockholders in connection
with the approval of the merger transaction between Acres and IGT and sought to enjoin and/or void
the merger agreement among other forms of relief. On September 19, 2003, the Court denied
plaintiffs motion for a TRO to prevent Acres stockholders from voting on the merger. On September
24, 2003, plaintiff petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to vacate the denial of the TRO and to
enjoin Acres from holding its stockholder vote on the merger. The Nevada Supreme Court denied the
petition on September 25, 2003.
On November 5, 2003, the plaintiff amended his complaint to recover damages. On December 23, 2003,
defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint for failure to state a
claim on which relief may be granted. On May 7, 2004, the Court issued an order denying
defendants motion to dismiss.
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint on September 9,
2004. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint on September 14, 2004. On
March 15, 2006, the Court issued an order denying defendants motion to dismiss the third
complaint. On April 7, 2006, defendant filed a Notice of Removal to United States District Court,
D. Nev. (Las Vegas). Plaintiff filed a motion to remand the action to state court, which was
granted by order dated August 15, 2006. On November 30, 2006, the case was transferred to business
court and discovery continues.
OSHA / Wrongful Termination Matter
On July 8, 2004, two former employees filed a complaint with the US Department of Labor, OSHA,
alleging retaliatory termination in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The former
employees allege that they were terminated in retaliation for questioning whether Anchor and its
executives failed to properly disclose information allegedly affecting the value of Anchors
patents in connection with IGTs acquisition of Anchor in 2001. The former employees also allege
that the acquired patents are overvalued on the financial statements of IGT. Outside counsel,
retained by an independent committee of our Board of Directors, reviewed the allegations and found
them to be entirely without merit.
On November 10, 2004, the employees withdrew their complaint filed with OSHA and filed a notice of
intent to file a complaint in federal court. On December 1, 2004, a complaint was filed under seal
in the US District Court for Nevada, based on the same facts set forth above regarding their OSHA
complaint. IGT filed a motion for summary judgment as to all claims in plaintiffs complaint,
which is currently pending before the US District Court, D. Nev. (Reno). IGT believes that the
allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
Related to the Anchor acquisition purchase price allocation as of December 31, 2001, IGT used the
relief of royalty valuation methodology to estimate the fair value of the patents at $164.4
million. The carrying value of the patents at March 31, 2007 totaled $88.5 million, with a
remaining life of approximately 9 years.
13
Arrangements with Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk, such as performance bonds, guarantees and product warranties not reflected in our
balance sheet. We do not expect any material losses to result from these arrangements, and we are
not dependent on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations.
Performance Bonds
Performance bonds outstanding related to gaming operations totaled $28.7 million at March 31, 2007.
We are liable to reimburse the bond issuer in the event of exercise due to nonperformance.
Letters of Credit
Outstanding letters of credit issued under our line of credit to ensure payment to certain vendors
and governmental agencies totaled $4.1 million at March 31, 2007.
IGT Licensor Arrangements
Our sales agreements that include software and intellectual property licensing arrangements may
provide a clause whereby IGT indemnifies the third party licensee against liability and damages
(including legal defense costs) arising from any claims of patent, copyright, trademark or trade
secret infringement. Should such a claim occur, we could be required to make payments to the
licensee for any liabilities or damages incurred. Historically, we have not incurred any
significant costs due to infringement claims. As we consider the likelihood of incurring future
costs to be remote, no liability has been recorded.
Product Warranties
Our warranty costs in the table below are accrued based on historical trends in product failure
rates and expected costs to provide warranty services. The majority of our products are generally
covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
Reduction for payments made |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Accrual for new warranties issued |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Adjustments for pre-existing warranties |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for various levels of workers compensation, directors and officers
liability, and electronic errors and omissions liability, as well as employee medical, dental,
prescription drug, and disability coverage. We purchase stop loss coverage to protect against
unexpected claims. Accrued insurance claims and reserves include estimated settlements for known
claims, and actuarial estimates of claims incurred but not reported.
State and Federal Taxes
We are
subject to sales, use, income and other tax audits and administrative proceedings in various federal, state, and local jurisdictions. While we believe we have properly reported our tax
liabilities in each jurisdiction, we can give no assurance that taxing authorities will not propose
adjustments that increase our tax liabilities.
13. Foreign Currency Derivatives
Our net foreign currency exposure related to monetary assets and liabilities totaled $75.2
million at March 31, 2007 and $151.0 million at September 30, 2006. The fair value of foreign
currency contracts hedging this exposure totaled $70.5 million at March 31, 2007 and $148.7 million
at September 30, 2006. These forward exchange contracts are not designated as hedging instruments
under SFAS 133 and resulting gains or losses are recognized in current earnings. The change in
exposure relates to the reduction in inter-company loans denominated in nonfunctional foreign
currency of our operations.
14
14. Business Segments
We view our business in two regional operating segments, each incorporating all types of revenues:
|
ª |
|
North America consists of our operations in the US and Canada. |
|
|
ª |
|
International encompasses our efforts in Asia, Australia, New Zealand,
Europe, Japan, Latin America, Russia, Africa, and the UK. |
Additionally, certain income and expense is managed at the corporate level and not allocated to any
operating segment. We do not recognize inter-company revenues or expenses upon the transfer of
gaming products between our operating segments. Segment profit reflects income before tax.
Our business segments are designed to allocate resources within a framework of management
responsibility. We continually evaluate the alignment of our business development and
administrative functions for reporting purposes, which may result in changes to segment
allocations. Prior year amounts are reclassified to conform to the current management view and
presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NORTH AMERICA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
491.6 |
|
|
$ |
494.9 |
|
|
$ |
996.6 |
|
|
$ |
978.4 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
180.6 |
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
408.0 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
311.0 |
|
|
|
293.6 |
|
|
|
608.6 |
|
|
|
570.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
290.7 |
|
|
|
282.1 |
|
|
|
575.1 |
|
|
|
549.5 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
|
110.4 |
|
|
|
214.4 |
|
|
|
222.2 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
171.7 |
|
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
327.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
211.4 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
|
|
402.4 |
|
|
|
385.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERNATIONAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
118.1 |
|
|
$ |
149.5 |
|
|
$ |
255.4 |
|
|
$ |
282.2 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
131.9 |
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
249.7 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
133.4 |
|
|
|
132.6 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
110.5 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unallocated expenses |
|
$ |
(38.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(78.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(65.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
609.7 |
|
|
$ |
644.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,252.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,260.6 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
268.6 |
|
|
|
333.2 |
|
|
|
586.0 |
|
|
|
657.7 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
341.1 |
|
|
|
311.2 |
|
|
|
666.0 |
|
|
|
602.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
356.5 |
|
|
|
350.2 |
|
|
|
708.5 |
|
|
|
682.1 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
145.5 |
|
|
|
166.3 |
|
|
|
310.8 |
|
|
|
332.7 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
211.0 |
|
|
|
183.9 |
|
|
|
397.7 |
|
|
|
349.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
394.2 |
|
|
|
386.4 |
|
15
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements which do not relate to historical or
current facts, but are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to analyses and other information based on
forecasts of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements may
also relate to future events or trends, our future prospects and proposed new products, services,
developments or business strategies, among other things. These statements can generally (although
not always) be identified by their use of terms and phrases such as anticipate, believe, could,
would, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict, project, pursue, will, continue, and other
similar terms and phrases, as well as the use of the future tense.
Examples of forward looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the
following categories of expectations about:
|
ª |
|
our ability to introduce new products and stimulate replacement demand |
|
|
ª |
|
the timing and expected success of new product introductions |
|
|
ª |
|
the timing of the introduction of and revenues from server-based systems |
|
|
ª |
|
benefits from research and development efforts |
|
|
ª |
|
our ability to acquire, develop or protect intellectual property |
|
|
ª |
|
our market share, competitive advantage, and leadership position |
|
|
ª |
|
the advantages offered to customers by our products and product features |
|
|
ª |
|
gaming expansion and new market opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
our ability to benefit from and effectively integrate and utilize acquired businesses and assets |
|
|
ª |
|
investments in other entities and improved position in related markets |
|
|
ª |
|
factors impacting future gross margins and tax rates |
|
|
ª |
|
increasing growth or contributions related to non-machine products and services |
|
|
ª |
|
increasing machine sales and placements |
|
|
ª |
|
legislative and regulatory developments and related market opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
available capital resources to fund future operations and other obligations |
|
|
ª |
|
timing and quantity of future repurchases of IGT common stock |
|
|
ª |
|
expectations regarding losses from off-balance sheet arrangements |
Although we believe as of today that the expectations reflected in any of our forward looking
statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied.
Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward looking
statements, are subject to change and to inherent known and unknown risks and uncertainties. See
Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this report for a discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties.
You should not assume at any point in the future that the forward looking statements in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are still valid. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to
update our forward looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
The following MDA is intended to enhance the readers understanding of our company operations
and present business environment. It should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006.
Italicized text with an attached superscript trademark or copyright notation in this document
indicates trademarks of IGT or its licensors. For a complete list of trademark and copyright
ownership information, please visit our website at www.IGT.com.
Our MDA is organized into the following sections:
|
ª |
|
OUR BUSINESS a general description of our business and operating segments |
|
|
ª |
|
OUR FOCUS a summary of our strategies and opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS a discussion of recently issued
accounting standards with significance to our business |
|
|
ª |
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES a discussion of accounting policies that
require critical judgments and estimates |
16
|
ª |
|
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS a year-over-year comparative analysis of
net income for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2007 |
|
|
ª |
|
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS a year-over-year comparative analysis of business
segment results for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2007 |
|
|
ª |
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES a year-over-year comparative analysis of
cash flows and capital resources for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2007 |
|
|
ª |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION - analysis of significant changes in our financial
position |
OUR BUSINESS
International Game Technology is a global company specializing in the design, manufacture,
and marketing of computerized gaming equipment, systems and services. Our ultimate goal is to grow
our business through a well-diversified base of profit contributors. We strive to be the
preeminent supplier of gaming products to the world by maintaining a wide array of entertainment
inspired gaming product lines and targeting gaming markets in all legal jurisdictions worldwide.
We are committed to providing quality products at competitive prices, designed to increase the
potential for operator profits by serving players better.
Our annual revenues totaled $2.5 billion in fiscal 2006 and $1.3 billion for the first half of
fiscal 2007. We derive our revenues in two ways, either from the sale (product sales) or placement
(gaming operations) of our gaming products, services and/or intellectual property. Operating
results reviewed by our chief decision makers encompass all revenue sources within each
geographical customer region. We currently view our business in two regional operating segments,
each incorporating all types of revenues.
|
ª |
|
North America consists of our operations in the US and Canada. |
|
|
ª |
|
International encompasses our efforts abroad in Asia, Australia, New Zealand,
Europe, Japan, Latin America, Russia, Africa, and the UK. |
Additionally, certain income and expenses related to company-wide initiatives are managed at the
corporate level and are not allocated to an operating segment. See the BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS
below and Note 14 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
segment information and financial results.
OUR FOCUS
We remain dedicated to generating financial growth by continuing to focus on the three
cornerstones of our success: product development, market development and capital deployment.
Product Development
We consider the driving force behind our success to be the ability to offer high quality games,
platforms and systems through dedicated product development efforts and superior customer service.
We continue pioneering innovation centered on serving players better by utilizing the power of
networked gaming, information technology, game design, and services to maximize the potential for
operator profitability. We invest a great deal more in product development than any of our
principal competitors and believe this helps us deliver the broadest product lines across the most
markets.
We are constantly updating our game libraries to address changing player preferences and other
market trends. We strive to develop games that incorporate exciting winning combinations and
appealing graphics and sound while adhering to our development standards intended to ensure quality
and expedite time to market. With the favorable player reaction to the introduction of communal
gaming with Wheel of Fortune® Super Spin, we plan further multi-player interactive game releases
with the introduction of our M-P Seriesä products in 2007. Initial M-P Seriesä
products are based on traditional player favorites including baccarat and roulette. In the second
half of fiscal 2007, our expected release of Ancient Chinese Secret will allow multiple players
to enter into a bonus round at the same time.
The popularity of our MLP games continues to drive incremental growth in IGTs gaming operations
installed base, with our newest MLP release, Soul Trainä , and the continuing strength of Red
Hot Jackpotsä and our MLP flagship, Fort Knox®. During the next six months, we also
anticipate the release of our Indiana Jonesä MLP featuring the AVP® Widescreen. This new
game will incorporate both MLP features as well as the group play concept allowing multiple players
to enter the same bonus round.
17
During fiscal 2007, we plan to introduce Guaranteed Playä Poker, our first product
developed in collaboration with Walker Digital, providing players a new option for purchasing
blocks of maximum bet poker hands for a set price. We anticipate future product offerings
incorporating this feature will give operators the ability to package slot play with other
promotional offerings.
In spite of challenging macro-trends for domestic machine replacements and increasing competition,
we have established a diverse revenue base through our continuing efforts to expand our business
model beyond machine sales as we move toward a more system-centric, networked gaming environment.
Our share of gaming systems in the marketplace continues to grow. At March 31, 2007, 660 IGT
systems were installed worldwide, compared to 550 this time last year. Our Table iDä
products continue gaining momentum in the market, further extending our reach into table games.
Our ongoing server-based development continues to focus on comprehensive enterprise-wide solutions
designed to enhance the player experience and improve operator efficiencies. As part of our
commitment to lead the industry through the networked gaming transformation, we are intent on
developing server-based systems that will offer customers a seamless interface with a variety of
hardware platforms. We believe our applications will differentiate our products in this area and
offer operators new ways to engage and interact with their players, as well as market
cross-functional products and player conveniences. With five commercial field trials in progress,
we expect to begin generating revenues from sbä in 2009.
Market Development
We are dependent, in part, on new market opportunities to generate growth. We continue with
initiatives directed at enhancing this growth rate and accommodating entry into new areas of
gaming. After a relatively quiet period for new market opportunities in North America, we realized
the first shipments into Pennsylvania, Florida racetracks and Arkansas during the first half of
fiscal 2007 and expect further developments in these markets. We also continue expanding our
installed base into non-traditional markets, most significantly in New York, Oklahoma and
California.
We expect recent legislation in Kansas and compact developments in Washington State may allow for a
combined total of approximately 20,000 additional machines. Other legislative activity in Florida
may result in tribes expanding their slot operations to include Class III machines generating
replacements in that market. The recent approval of new tribal compacts by the California Senate
indicates strong potential for an increase of over 20,000 additional Class III machines in the
state. Although the timing of these opportunities remains uncertain, we anticipate developments
within the next few years.
Prospects for growth in international markets remain favorable. We continue expanding our presence
in Mexico with increased CDS placements and expect to add another 1,000 recurring revenue units by
the end of fiscal 2007. We anticipate increasing IGT shipments in Japan related to the mandated
market replacement of 1.2 to 1.5 million pachisuro machines as it fully transitions to a Reg-5
environment by the end of fiscal 2007. We are well positioned to capitalize on the accelerated
replacement demand expected between June and September with our latest game, Sangokushi, scheduled
for release in the third quarter and other game releases planned for the remainder of fiscal 2007.
We also expect to sell or place additional machines in Argentina over the next five years in
connection with the financing agreements discussed below. In addition, we plan to develop new
business in the Chinese video lottery market through our recent partnership discussed below.
Capital Deployment
We continue to generate substantial operating cash flows, enabling us to reinvest in our business
and return value to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. We anticipate an
increase in share repurchase activity over the next three years. See the LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES section that follows for recent share repurchase and dividend activity.
We enter into strategic business combinations and alliances to complement our internal resources.
We consider businesses that offer opportunities to expand our geographic reach, product lines and
customer base, as well as prospects that may leverage our existing infrastructure through economies
of scale. During the first quarter of 2007, we invested $21.8 million in the acquisition of VCAT,
renamed Mariposa Software Inc. We anticipate VCATs Mariposa software will enhance our position as
a leading provider of integrated solutions for casino customer relationship management. See Note 4
of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding
this acquisition.
18
In order to capitalize on international growth opportunities, we may provide financing to customers
for the expansion or construction of gaming locations to reduce the time required to develop these
markets. In April 2007, IGT agreed to provide up to $120.0 million in equipment notes and
development financing loans to gaming operators in Argentina. In
May 2007, we also committed to fund equity investments and
convertible notes of approximately $103.0 million in a strategic
business partner in China, subject to customary closing conditions.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
IGT stays abreast of new generally accepted accounting principles and disclosure reporting
requirements issued by the SEC and other standard setting agencies. Recently issued accounting
standards that may materially affect our financial results are described in Note 1 of our Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the US. Accordingly, we are required to make estimates incorporating
judgments and assumptions we believe are reasonable based on our historical experience, contract
terms, observance of known trends in our company and the industry as a whole, as well as
information available from other outside sources. Our estimates affect amounts recorded in the
financial statements and actual results may differ from initial estimates.
We consider the following accounting estimates to be the most critical to fully understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results. They require us to make subjective or complex judgments
about matters that are inherently uncertain or variable. Senior management discussed the
development, selection and disclosure of the following accounting estimates, considered most
sensitive to changes from external factors, with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets, and Royalties
Goodwill is measured and tested for impairment using the two-step approach under SFAS 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, at least annually or more frequently when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the asset may be impaired. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its
implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess. Our goodwill totaled
$1.1 billion at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006. The last three annual goodwill impairment
tests indicate the fair value of each reporting unit is substantially in excess of its carrying
value.
In determining the fair value of our reporting units, we apply the income approach using the
discounted cash flow (DCF) method. We then compare the implied valuation multiples of a group of
comparable competitor gaming companies under the market approach to test the reasonableness of our
DCF results. The DCF analysis is based on the present value of two components: the sum of our five
year projected cash flows and a terminal value assuming a long-term growth rate. The cash flow
estimates are prepared based on our business plans for each reporting unit, considering historical
results and anticipated future performance based on our expectations regarding product
introductions and market opportunities. The discount rates used to determine the present value of
future cash flows are derived from the weighted average cost of capital of a set of comparable
gaming companies, considering the size and specific risks of each reporting unit.
Our portfolio of other intangibles substantially consists of finite-lived patents, contracts,
trademarks, developed technology, and customer relationships. We regularly monitor events or
changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value of these intangibles may not be
recoverable or requires a revision to the estimated remaining useful life in accordance with SFAS
144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Our other intangibles totaled
$252.3 million at March 31, 2007 and $257.0 million at September 30, 2006. We recorded no related
material impairment charges during the six months ended March 31, 2007 or 2006.
If an event or change occurs, we estimate cash flows directly associated with the use of the
intangible to test recoverability and remaining useful lives based on the forecasted utilization of
the asset and expected product revenues. In developing estimated cash flows, we incorporate
assumptions regarding changes in legal factors, related industry climate, regulatory actions,
contractual factors, operational performance and the companys strategic business plans, as well as
the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other market conditions. When the carrying
amount exceeds the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition
of a lived intangible asset or asset group, we then compare the carrying amount to its current fair
value. We estimate the fair value using prices for similar assets, if available, or more typically
using a DCF model. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount is not recoverable and
exceeds its fair value.
19
We also regularly evaluate the estimated future benefit of prepaid and deferred royalties to
determine amounts unlikely to be realized from forecasted sales or placements of our games. The
carrying value of our prepaid and deferred royalties totaled $125.4 million at March 31, 2007 and
$136.5 million at September 30, 2006.
Application of the impairment test to goodwill, other intangibles, and royalties requires judgment,
including the identification of reporting units, allocation of related goodwill, assignment of
corporate shared assets and liabilities to reporting units, estimated cash flows, and
determinations of fair value. While we believe our estimates of future revenues and cash flows are
reasonable, different assumptions could materially affect the assessment of useful lives,
recoverability and fair value. If actual cash flows fall below initial forecasts, we may need to
record additional amortization and/or impairment charges.
Jackpot Liabilities and Expenses
IGTs gaming operations encompass a variety of recurring revenue arrangements. Wide area
progressive systems games are the only recurring revenue arrangements incorporating an IGT paid
progressive jackpot for which we recognize corresponding jackpot liabilities and expense. Changes
in our estimated amounts for jackpot liabilities and associated jackpot expense are attributable to
regular analysis and evaluation of the following factors:
|
ª |
|
variations in slot play (i.e. jackpot life cycles and slot play patterns) |
|
|
ª |
|
volume (i.e. number of WAP units in service and coin-in per unit) |
|
|
ª |
|
interest rate movements |
|
|
ª |
|
the size of base jackpots (i.e. initial amount of the progressive jackpots displayed to players) |
Interest rates applicable to jackpot funding vary by jurisdiction and are impacted by market
forces, as well as winner elections to receive a lump sum payment in lieu of periodic annual
payments. Current and non-current portions of jackpot liabilities, as well as jackpot expense, may
also be impacted by changes in our estimates and assumptions regarding the expected number of
future winners who may elect a lump sum payout.
Our jackpot liabilities totaled $659.8 million at March 31, 2007 and $546.7 million at September
30, 2006. A more detailed discussion of jackpot accounting and market interest rate risk related
to our cost to fund jackpot liabilities is available in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2006 in the following sections:
|
ª |
|
Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial StatementsSummary of Significant Accounting
PoliciesJackpot Liabilities and Expense |
|
|
ª |
|
Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskInterest Rate
RiskCost to Fund Jackpot Liabilities |
Inventory and Gaming Operations Equipment
The determination of obsolete or excess inventory requires us to estimate the future demand for our
products within specific time horizons, generally, one year or less. If we experience a
significant unexpected decrease in demand for our products or a higher occurrence of inventory
obsolescence because of changes in technology or customer requirements, we could be required to
increase our inventory provisions. Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance the
need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times versus the risk of
inventory obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements. Our
inventories totaled $158.5 million at March 31, 2007 and $162.1 million at September 30, 2006.
We are also required to estimate salvage values and useful lives for our gaming operations
equipment. Trends in market demand and technological obsolescence may require us to record
additional asset charges, which would have a negative impact on gross profit.
Share-based Compensation
We account for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R. Under the fair value
recognition provisions, we estimate share-based compensation at the award grant date and recognize
expense over the service period. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, and changes in the assumptions used can materially affect the fair value estimate.
Judgment is required in estimating stock price volatility, forfeiture rates, expected dividends,
and expected terms that options remain outstanding. See Notes 1 and 3 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 for
additional information regarding these assumptions.
20
Income Taxes
Determination of the appropriate amount and classification of income taxes depends on several
factors, including estimates of the timing and probability of realization of deferred income
taxes, as well as income tax payment timing. We adjust deferred taxes based on the changes in the
difference between the book and tax basis of our assets and liabilities, measured by future tax
rates we estimate will apply when these differences are expected to reverse. This process
involves estimating our current tax position in each federal, state, and foreign jurisdiction, as
well as making judgments as to whether our taxable income in future periods will be sufficient to
fully recover any deferred tax assets. We reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance
when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized
based on our estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction.
The calculation of our tax liabilities also involves dealing with uncertainties in the application
of complex tax regulations. We recognize potential tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit
issues in the US and other jurisdictions based on our estimate of the extent to which additional
taxes will be due. If payment of these amounts proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of
liabilities could result in the recognition of a future tax benefit. If our tax liabilities are
understated, a charge to our tax provision would result. Changes in current tax laws, enacted tax
rates, geographic mix or the estimated level of annual taxable income could change our valuation
of deferred tax assets and liabilities, which in turn impacts our effective tax rate and tax
provision. Additionally, we are currently evaluating the impact of the guidance issued in June
2006 under FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, effective for IGT at the beginning of fiscal year 2008.
Net deferred tax assets totaled $208.5 million at March 31, 2007 and $136.6 million at September
30, 2006 and accrued income taxes totaled $22.9 million at March 31, 2007 and $36.1 million at
September 30, 2006.
21
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS A Year Over Year Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
March 31, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
(In millions except units & EPS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
609.7 |
|
|
$ |
644.4 |
|
|
$ |
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
$ |
1,252.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,260.6 |
|
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
356.5 |
|
|
|
350.2 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
708.5 |
|
|
|
682.1 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
4 |
pp |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
202.2 |
|
|
$ |
192.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
387.5 |
|
|
$ |
378.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
249.2 |
|
|
$ |
244.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
178.8 |
|
|
$ |
244.7 |
|
|
$ |
(65.9 |
) |
|
|
-27 |
% |
|
$ |
411.5 |
|
|
$ |
476.2 |
|
|
$ |
(64.7 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
Non-machine |
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
174.5 |
|
|
|
181.5 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
268.6 |
|
|
|
333.2 |
|
|
|
(64.6 |
) |
|
|
-19 |
% |
|
|
586.0 |
|
|
|
657.7 |
|
|
|
(71.7 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
145.5 |
|
|
$ |
166.3 |
|
|
$ |
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
|
$ |
310.8 |
|
|
$ |
332.7 |
|
|
$ |
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
-7 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
4 |
pp |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Units sold |
|
|
18,800 |
|
|
|
36,900 |
|
|
|
(18,100 |
) |
|
|
-49 |
% |
|
|
45,600 |
|
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
(20,400 |
) |
|
|
-31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
341.1 |
|
|
$ |
311.2 |
|
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
666.0 |
|
|
$ |
602.9 |
|
|
$ |
63.1 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
211.0 |
|
|
|
183.9 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
397.7 |
|
|
|
349.4 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Installed base units |
|
|
54,800 |
|
|
|
44,400 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
54,800 |
|
|
|
44,400 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Consolidated total revenues for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007 declined due
to lower product sales partially offset by continuing growth in our gaming operations. Improvement
in gaming operations increased total gross profit compared to the prior year periods. Our ability
to generate increasing gross profits with declining machine sales is, to some extent, reflective of
our diverse product offerings. Total gross margin increase is the combined result of a greater mix
of gaming operations, as well as margin improvements in both product sales and gaming operations
discussed further below.
Significant items affecting comparability in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2007
include:
|
ª |
|
a current quarter gain of $17.0 million from our Gulf Coast hurricane
business interruption and property damage insurance settlement |
|
|
ª |
|
a $4.5 million net benefit from the sale of a company airplane |
Consolidated Product Sales
Revenues and gross profit for the quarter and six months were down on lower volumes due to soft
demand for domestic machine replacements, combined with lower international shipments. Gross
margin improvement is attributable to the greater mix of higher margin non-machine sales and
reduced mix of low-margin international machine sales. Consolidated product sales margins
fluctuate depending on the geographical mix and types of products sold, and we anticipate a
downward trend due to an increasing mix of lower margin international units.
Consolidated Gaming Operations
Growth in our installed base of recurring revenue machines is the primary reason for current
quarter revenue and gross profit improvements. Year-over-year lease operations units grew
primarily in Mexico, New York, Delaware and Rhode Island while casino operations placements grew
most significantly in Oklahoma, California and Florida.
Gross profit and margin also improved due to decreased jackpot expense and hurricane insurance
gains in North America (see Business Segment Results below). Gaming operations margins vary
depending on our installed base mix, variations in slot play, as well as interest rate movements.
We are projecting a trend of 57% to 60% for the second half of fiscal 2007.
22
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
87.2 |
|
|
$ |
93.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
185.5 |
|
|
$ |
177.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
154.3 |
|
|
$ |
157.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
321.0 |
|
|
$ |
303.6 |
|
|
$ |
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of revenue |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A increases during the periods included:
|
ª |
|
additional staffing costs of $8.2 million for the quarter and $15.0 million
year-to-date in support of business growth initiatives |
|
|
ª |
|
rising legal and compliance fees of $3.8 million for the quarter and $9.7
million year to date, largely related to intellectual property protection and the growing
number of product submissions |
The increases in SG&A were offset by:
|
ª |
|
Gulf Coast hurricane business interruption insurance gains of $12.0 million |
|
|
ª |
|
a $5.8 million gain on the sale of a company airplane to
a related party, less $1.3 million in repairs and maintenance
required as a condition of the sale, for a realized net benefit of $4.5 million. |
|
|
ª |
|
favorable bad debt provisions of $4.4 million for the quarter and $5.6
million for the first six months, resulting from improving trends in receivables quality
and collections |
R&D increases are primarily due to additional staffing costs of $4.4 million for the quarter and
$9.3 million for the first half, supporting development of new technology and products.
Other Income (Expense) and Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
$ |
41.5 |
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Interest expense: |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
-71 |
% |
|
|
(35.4 |
) |
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
-42 |
% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provisions |
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
74.0 |
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145.0 |
|
|
$ |
141.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax rate, including one time items |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
0.1 |
pp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
(0.1 |
)pp |
|
|
|
|
Interest income improved primarily due to higher earnings on investments and receivables.
Interest expense increased mainly because of higher debt balances and related interest rates,
mostly due to the issuance of our 2.6% Debentures in December 2006. See Note 8 of our Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our credit facilities
and indebtedness.
The reconsolidation of our NJ WAP trust VIEs in the first quarter of 2007 is also contributing to
increases in interest income and interest expense. See Note 1 of our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about the NJ trust VIE reconsolidations.
Our annual tax rate (excluding one-time items) increased to 37.3% as of March 31, 2007 compared to
36.8% in the prior year period mainly due to changes in the forecasted geographical mix of taxable
income for the fiscal year. We currently anticipate no significant change in this rate for the
remainder of fiscal 2007.
23
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS A Year Over Year Comparative Analysis
Operating income for each division below reflects applicable operating expenses. See Note 14
of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to
our business segments.
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
March 31, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
(In millions, except units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
491.6 |
|
|
$ |
494.9 |
|
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
$ |
996.6 |
|
|
$ |
978.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
290.7 |
|
|
|
282.1 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
575.1 |
|
|
|
549.5 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
205.1 |
|
|
$ |
192.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
389.8 |
|
|
$ |
374.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
109.8 |
|
|
$ |
130.5 |
|
|
$ |
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
-16 |
% |
|
$ |
248.0 |
|
|
$ |
263.8 |
|
|
$ |
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
-6 |
% |
Non-machine |
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
|
|
144.2 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
-3 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
180.6 |
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
-10 |
% |
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
408.0 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
|
$ |
110.4 |
|
|
$ |
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
-10 |
% |
|
$ |
214.4 |
|
|
$ |
222.2 |
|
|
$ |
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
pp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Units sold |
|
|
9,700 |
|
|
|
12,900 |
|
|
|
(3,200 |
) |
|
|
-25 |
% |
|
|
21,900 |
|
|
|
27,200 |
|
|
|
(5,300 |
) |
|
|
-19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
311.0 |
|
|
$ |
293.6 |
|
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
608.6 |
|
|
$ |
570.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
171.7 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
360.7 |
|
|
|
327.3 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Installed base units |
|
|
46,900 |
|
|
|
39,200 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
46,900 |
|
|
|
39,200 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
North America realized increased total revenues for the first half of fiscal 2007, as well as
increased total gross profit and margins for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007.
Improvements are primarily the result of continued growth in our installed base of recurring
revenue games, offsetting the decline in machine sales.
North America Product Sales
Higher pricing and a greater mix of higher margin non-machine sales partially offset lower machine
shipments in the current quarter and six months. Machine shipments are down because of fewer
replacement opportunities due to the young age of most domestic machines in the market following
the cashless replacement cycle coupled with the anticipation of upcoming technological developments
related to server-based gaming. The timing of market expansion opportunities also affects machine
shipments. Fewer gaming systems, parts, and conversions, partially offset by increases in license
fees, are reflected in the decreased non-machine revenues in the first half of fiscal 2007.
North America Gaming Operations
Improvements in gaming operations revenues and gross profit are mainly attributable to growth in
our installed base. The growth in our installed base resulted primarily from incremental
placements of:
|
ª |
|
lease operations games in New York, Delaware and Rhode Island |
|
|
ª |
|
Class III, Instant Bingo and poker products in Oklahoma |
|
|
ª |
|
CDS and Class II units in California, Florida, and Alabama |
Gross profit and margin also improved due to lower jackpot expense, as well as a gain of $5.0
million from our hurricane property damage insurance settlement. Jackpot expense decreased $8.1
million for the quarter, substantially as a result of variations in
slot play. For
the half-year period, jackpot expense was down $4.6 million, with $9.4 million attributable to variations in slot play, offset by $4.3
million due to favorable interest rate movements.
24
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
March 31, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
(In millions, except units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
118.1 |
|
|
$ |
149.5 |
|
|
$ |
(31.4 |
) |
|
|
-21 |
% |
|
$ |
255.4 |
|
|
$ |
282.2 |
|
|
$ |
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
-9 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
133.4 |
|
|
|
132.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
10 |
pp |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
5 |
pp |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
|
$ |
68.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
-9 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
pp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
69.0 |
|
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
-40 |
% |
|
$ |
163.5 |
|
|
$ |
212.4 |
|
|
$ |
(48.9 |
) |
|
|
-23 |
% |
Non-machine |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
131.9 |
|
|
|
(43.9 |
) |
|
|
-33 |
% |
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
249.7 |
|
|
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
|
-21 |
% |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
-18 |
% |
|
$ |
96.4 |
|
|
$ |
110.5 |
|
|
$ |
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
10 |
pp |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
5 |
pp |
|
|
11 |
% |
Units sold |
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
(14,900 |
) |
|
|
-62 |
% |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
38,800 |
|
|
|
(15,100 |
) |
|
|
-39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
(3 |
)pp |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
(4 |
)pp |
|
|
-6 |
% |
Installed base units |
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Declines in total international revenues during the current periods are principally due to
fewer machine sales partially offset by continuing growth in gaming operations. Increases in total
gross margins resulted from the change in product sales mix as well as the increased contribution
from gaming operations.
The decline in international product sales and gross profit during the current periods is primarily
due to fewer machine sales in Japan and the UK. Japan sales decreased by 10,500 units in the
current quarter and 4,100 units for the first six months of 2007 related to the timing of pachislot
releases and customer purchases in anticipation of the market transition to a Reg-5 gaming
environment required by September 30, 2007. UK sales declined largely due to prior year sales
benefiting from a limited regulatory window of opportunity. Improvements in product sales gross
margin are due to the lower mix of Japan and UK sales.
International product sales margins fluctuate depending on geographic and product mix, especially
related to Japans contribution. Successes in Japan can contribute significantly to gross profits
and operating income, but lower priced pachisuro games reduce gross margin. We expect an
escalation of Reg-5 sales in Japan during the second half of fiscal 2007, as all existing Reg-4
pachislots in the marketplace must be replaced by September 30, 2007. Through mid-April, we
received orders for 16,000 units of our latest game scheduled for release during the third quarter.
Improving gaming operations revenues and gross profit are the result of a growing international
installed base of recurring revenue games. Year-over-year placements increased most significantly
in Mexico reaching an installed base of 5,900 CDS units at March 31, 2007.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Resources
Our principal source of liquidity is cash generated from operations, which allows us to
reinvest in our business. Our sources of capital also include, but are not limited to, the
issuance of public or private placement debt, bank borrowings under our credit facilities and the
issuance of equity securities. We expect our available capital resources to be sufficient to fund
our operating requirements, current capital expenditures, scheduled debt repayments, share
repurchases, dividends, interest and income tax obligations.
25
Our working capital increased to $857.6 million at March 31, 2007 from $129.1 million at September
30, 2006, primarily related to the redemption of our 1.75% Debentures previously classified in
current liabilities at September 30, 2006. Activity ratios for the trailing twelve months ended
March 31, 2007 compared to the same prior year period include:
|
ª |
|
average days sales outstanding decreased to 75 days versus 80 days |
|
|
ª |
|
inventory turns declined to 3.6 compared to 4.4 |
Cash Flows Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
366.5 |
|
|
$ |
204.8 |
|
|
$ |
161.7 |
|
Investing |
|
|
(178.0 |
) |
|
|
(106.5 |
) |
|
|
(71.5 |
) |
Financing |
|
|
(146.4 |
) |
|
|
(109.7 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
Effects of exchange rates |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change |
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
(9.7 |
) |
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
Increased operating cash flows in the first half of fiscal 2007 are mainly related to timing of
receivable collections, as well as prepayments for exclusive licensing rights in the prior half
year.
Fluctuations in net cash flows related to WAP jackpot liabilities reflect timing variations in
jackpot life cycles, slot play volumes, and winner payments. See Note 1 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements in our most recent Form 10-K for additional information about accounting for
jackpot liabilities.
Investing
The most significant fluctuations in cash used for investing include:
|
ª |
|
additional capital expenditures of $47.4 million |
|
|
ª |
|
$45.8 million in reduced net proceeds from investment securities |
|
|
ª |
|
$14.4 million of increased business acquisitions |
|
|
ª |
|
the equity investment of $56.0 million in Casino IP Holdings, LLC during the prior year |
Capital Expenditures
Current year capital investments in property, plant and equipment include ongoing construction of
our new Las Vegas campus and updated transportation equipment. Capital expenditures for gaming
operations equipment are consistent with installed base growth. We expect to spend an additional
$36.4 million to complete the Las Vegas campus construction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Amount |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
77.2 |
|
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
95.3 |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Intellectual property |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
181.9 |
|
|
$ |
134.5 |
|
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Financing
Net cash used for financing activities increased in the current six months primarily related to
increased expenditures for share repurchases and repayment of the 1.75% Debentures, offset by
proceeds from the issuance of the 2.6% Debentures.
Stock Repurchases
We repurchase shares to return value to shareholders and reduce outstanding share dilution.
We use open market or privately negotiated transactions, such as accelerated share repurchases and
prepaid structured share repurchases, depending on market conditions and other factors, to achieve
our timing, cost and volume objectives.
26
We repurchased 8.3 million shares in open market transactions for an aggregate cost of $362.7
million in the first half of 2007. We repurchased 3.5 million additional shares in open market
transactions for an aggregate cost of $138.3 million between March 31, 2007 and May 3, 2007. In
April 2007, the board approved an increase of 50 million shares to our ongoing share repurchase
authorization. Our remaining share repurchase authorization totaled
49.6 million as of May 3,
2007.
Credit Facilities and Indebtedness (See Note 8 of our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements)
On December 20, 2006, we issued $900.0 million principal amount of 2.6% Convertible
Debentures due 2036 in a private placement. Under certain circumstances, the 2.6% Debentures are
convertible into cash up to the outstanding principal amount and shares for any excess conversion
value. The initial conversion rate is 16.1875 shares per $1,000 principal, for a conversion price
of $61.78 per share. The Debentures will pay cash interest semi-annually in June and December at a
rate of 2.6% per year.
On December 26, 2006, our outstanding 1.75% Debentures were called for redemption. The call of the
Debentures gave holders the right to convert their Debentures before January 10, 2007 and receive
aggregate consideration comprised of shares and cash under the terms of the applicable indentures.
In conjunction with the redemption and related conversions, we paid holders $612.7 million and
issued 7.3 million shares in the first six months of 2007.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Amount |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,186.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,902.7 |
|
|
$ |
283.9 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,212.8 |
|
|
|
1,860.7 |
|
|
|
352.1 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,973.8 |
|
|
|
2,042.0 |
|
|
|
(68.2 |
) |
Assets and liabilities related to past jackpot winners increased by $117.5 million in the
current period due to the reconsolidation of the NJ trust VIEs in November 2006. See Note 1 of our
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the
reconsolidation of the NJ trusts.
Additionally, property, plant and equipment assets increased $61.0 million mainly due to our Las
Vegas campus construction, and deferred tax assets increased $71.9 million largely due to the
elimination of $47.3 million in deferred tax liabilities adjusted to APIC for the 1.75% Debenture
conversions.
Liabilities also increased $288.9 million related to the refinancing of our convertible debentures
in December 2006. See Note 8 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information about our debt.
Stockholders equity decreased during the current period primarily as a result of share repurchases
and dividends paid, partially offset by current period earnings and APIC adjustments related to the
1.75% Debenture conversions.
Arrangements With Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk, such as performance bonds and other guarantees not reflected in our balance sheet. We
do not expect any material losses from, nor are we dependent on off-balance sheet arrangements to
fund our operations.
Additional off-balance sheet arrangements are described in Note 12 of our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
We may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business
partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including but not limited to, losses
arising:
|
ª |
|
out of our breach of agreements with those parties |
|
|
ª |
|
from services to be provided by us |
|
|
ª |
|
from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties |
27
Additionally, we have agreements with our directors and certain officers that require us, among
other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise because of their status
or service as directors or officers. We have also agreed to indemnify certain former officers and
directors of acquired companies. We maintain director and officer insurance, covering our
indemnification obligations in certain circumstances.
It is not possible to determine our maximum potential indemnification obligations due to the
limited history of prior claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular
agreement. Such indemnification undertakings may not be subject to maximum loss clauses.
Historically, we have not incurred material costs related to indemnification obligations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Except for the changes to Convertible Debentures Price Risk below, there have been no
material changes in our assessment of sensitivity to market risk since those presented in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 7A, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
The fair value of our Debentures is affected by changes in the price of IGT stock and changes in
interest rates, typically increasing and decreasing with stock price. In general, the fair value
of an investment in a fixed interest rate debt instrument increases as interest rates fall and
decreases as interest rates rise. The stock price and interest rate changes impact the fair value
of our Debentures, however these changes currently have no material affect on our financial
position, cash flows or results of operations.
We estimate the fair value of our newly issued 2.6% Debentures at March 31, 2007 totaled $877.7
million versus $887.6 million at issuance. See Note 8 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about the new 2.6% Debentures issued in December
2006 and the redemption of our old 1.75% Debentures in January 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified by the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. We recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving desired control
objectives. Judgment is required when designing and evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
potential controls and procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, with the supervision and participation of
management, including the CEO and CFO, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As a part of our normal operations, we update our internal controls as necessary to
accommodate any modifications to our business processes or accounting procedures. No change
occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
28
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 12 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated by reference in response to this item.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
With the exception of the addition of the first three risk factors below, there have been
no material changes in our assessment of risk factors affecting our business since those
presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1A, for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2006. For convenience, our updated risk factors are included below in this Item 1A.
Investments and development financing loans could adversely impact liquidity.
We may invest in and/or provide financing for expansion or construction of gaming locations and
other business purposes. Such financing subjects us to increased concentrations of credit risk, as
well as other inherent risks such as political or economic instability in related markets. Our
liquidity or financial position may be negatively impacted if we are unable to collect on these
loans or benefit from these investments.
Current environmental laws, or those enacted in the future could result in additional
liabilities and costs.
Manufacturing of our products may require the use of materials that are subject to a variety of
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws could increase
our costs and impact the availability of components required to manufacture our product. Violation
of these laws may subject us to significant fines, penalties or disposal costs, which could
negatively impact our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Our outstanding 2.6% Debentures subject us to additional risks.
Our 2.6% Debentures issued in December 2006 contain a net settlement feature which could impact
liquidity if a significant number of Debentures convert or are otherwise redeemed.
Our ability to operate in our existing markets or expand into new jurisdictions could be
adversely affected by changing regulations or problems with obtaining needed licenses or
approvals.
We operate only in jurisdictions where gaming is legal. The gaming industry is subject to
extensive governmental regulation by US federal, state and local governments, as well as tribal
officials or organizations and foreign governments. While the regulatory requirements vary by
jurisdiction, most require:
|
ª |
|
licenses and/or permits |
|
|
ª |
|
findings of suitability |
|
|
ª |
|
documentation of qualifications, including evidence of financial stability |
|
|
ª |
|
other required approvals for companies who manufacture or distribute gaming equipment and services |
|
|
ª |
|
individual suitability of officers, directors, major stockholders and key employees |
Any delays in obtaining regulatory approvals needed for expansion within existing markets or into
new jurisdictions can negatively affect our opportunities for growth. Further, changes in existing
gaming regulations may hinder or prevent us from continuing to operate in those jurisdictions where
we currently do business, which would harm our operating results. In particular, the enactment of
unfavorable legislation or government efforts affecting or directed at manufacturers or gaming
operators, such as referendums to increase gaming taxes or requirements to use local distributors,
can have a negative impact on our operations.
Slow growth in the number of new casinos or the rate of replacement of existing gaming machines
could limit or reduce our future profits.
Demand for our products is driven substantially by the replacement of existing gaming machines, the
establishment of new gaming jurisdictions, and the addition of new casinos or expansion of existing
casinos within existing gaming jurisdictions. The establishment or expansion of gaming in any
jurisdiction typically requires a public referendum or other legislative action. As a result,
gaming continues to be the subject of public debate, and there are numerous active organizations
that oppose gaming. Opposition to gaming could result in restrictions on or even prohibitions of
gaming operations in any jurisdiction. In addition, the rate of growth in the North American
marketplace has diminished. A continued reduction in growth or in the number of gaming
jurisdictions or delays in the opening of new or expanded casinos could reduce the demand for our
products.
29
Demand for our products could be adversely affected by changes in player and operator
preferences.
As a supplier of gaming machines, we must offer themes and products that appeal to gaming operators
and players. If we are unable to anticipate or timely react to any significant changes in player
preferences, such as a negative change in the trend of acceptance of our newest systems innovations
or jackpot fatigue (declining play levels on smaller jackpots), the demand for our gaming products
could decline. Further, our products could suffer a loss of floor space to table games and
operators may reduce revenue sharing arrangements, each of which would harm our sales and financial
results. In addition, general changes in consumer behavior, such as reduced travel activity and
redirection of entertainment dollars to other venues, could result in reduced demand for our
products.
Our business is vulnerable to changing economic conditions.
Unfavorable changes in general economic conditions including recession, economic slowdown, or
higher fuel or other transportation costs, may reduce disposable income of casino patrons or result
in fewer patrons visiting casinos. Such a decline in the relative health of the gaming industry
would likely result in a decline in the amount of resources our customers have to purchase our
products and services. This may also result in reduced play levels, which could cause our cash
flows and revenues from revenue sharing products to decline. Our operating results may be
negatively impacted by a decrease in interest rates causing an increase in jackpot expense and a
reduction of investment income.
Our success in the competitive gaming industry depends in large part on our ability to develop
and manage frequent introductions of innovative products.
The gaming industry is intensely competitive, and many of our competitors have substantial
resources and specialize in the development and marketing of their products. Because the gaming
industry is characterized by dynamic customer demand and rapid technological advances, we must
continually introduce and successfully market new themes and technologies in order to remain
competitive and effectively stimulate customer demand. Our customers will accept a new product
only if it is likely to increase operator profits more than competitors products. There is no
guarantee that our new products will attain this market acceptance or that our competitors will not
more effectively anticipate or respond to changing customer preferences. In addition, any delays
by us in introducing new games on schedule could negatively impact our operating results by
providing an opportunity for our competitors to introduce new products and gain market share ahead
of us.
Failure to attract, retain and motivate key employees may adversely affect our ability to
compete.
Our success depends largely on recruiting and retaining talented employees. The market for
qualified executives and highly skilled, technical workers is intensely competitive. The loss of
key employees or an inability to hire a sufficient number of technical staff could limit our
ability to develop successful products and cause delays in getting new products to market.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property.
A significant portion of our revenues is generated from products using certain intellectual
property rights, and our operating results would be negatively impacted if we were unsuccessful in
protecting these rights from infringement. In addition, some of our most popular games and
features are based on trademarks, patents and other intellectual property licensed from third
parties. The continued success of these games may depend upon our ability to retain or expand
these licenses with reasonable terms. We also depend on trade secret law to protect certain
proprietary knowledge and have entered into confidentiality agreements with those of our employees
who have access to this information. However, there can be no guarantees that our employees will
not breach these agreements, and if these agreements are breached it is unlikely that the remedies
available to us will be sufficient to compensate us for the damages suffered.
We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement or invalidity.
Periodically we receive notification from others claiming that we are infringing their patent,
trademark or other intellectual property rights. Regardless of their merit, such claims may cause
us to incur significant costs. Responding to these claims could also require us to stop selling or
to redesign our products, to pay significant amounts in damages or enter into agreements to pay
significant licensing fees or royalties. Additionally, if any of these claims prove successful, it
could limit our ability to bring new products to market in the future.
Our gaming machines and online operations may experience losses due to fraudulent
activities.
We incorporate security features into the design of our gaming machines and other systems,
including those responsible for our online operations, designed to prevent us and our patrons from
being defrauded. However, there can be no guarantee that such security features will continue to
be effective in the future. If our security systems fail to prevent fraud, our operating results
could be adversely affected. Additionally, if third parties breach our security systems and
defraud our patrons, the public may lose confidence in our gaming machines and operations.
30
Our outstanding credit facility subjects us to additional risks.
Our Senior Credit Facility subjects us to a number of financial covenants, which could result in an
event of default if not complied with. The Senior Credit Facility also includes restrictions that
may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the
industry.
The risks related to operations outside of traditional US law could negatively affect our
results.
We operate in many countries outside of the US and tribal jurisdictions with sovereign immunity
which subjects us to certain inherent risks including:
|
ª |
|
political or economic instability in international markets |
|
|
ª |
|
additional costs of compliance with international laws |
|
|
ª |
|
tariffs and other trade barriers |
|
|
ª |
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates |
|
|
ª |
|
adverse changes in the creditworthiness of parties with whom we have
significant receivables or forward currency exchange contracts |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The purpose of our 1990 common stock repurchase authorization, as amended, is to return value to
our shareholders and reduce the number of shares outstanding. We may repurchase shares in the open
market, in privately negotiated transactions, or under Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, depending on
market conditions and other factors. The authorization does not specify an expiration date.
Our quarterly share repurchases are summarized below, excluding treasury shares acquired in
non-cash transactions related to forfeited stock awards or shares exchanged for options exercised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
of Shares Still |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Available for |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid Per |
|
as part of a Publicly |
|
Purchase Under |
Periods |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Announced Plan |
|
the Plan |
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 - January 27, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
January 28 - February 24, 2007 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
43.22 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
February 25 - March 31, 2007 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
39.49 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
40.91 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
31
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) |
|
IGT held its annual meeting of stockholders on March 6, 2007. |
(b) |
|
The following directors were elected to serve until the next annual meeting and constitute
all of the directors of IGT. |
|
|
|
Voting was as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Number of Shares |
Director |
|
Voted for |
|
Withheld |
Neil Barsky |
|
|
291,439,183 |
|
|
|
14,880,061 |
|
Robert A. Bittman |
|
|
301,617,965 |
|
|
|
4,701,280 |
|
Richard R. Burt |
|
|
301,898,566 |
|
|
|
4,420,679 |
|
Patti S. Hart |
|
|
301,906,470 |
|
|
|
4,412,774 |
|
Leslie S. Heisz |
|
|
301,920,828 |
|
|
|
4,398,417 |
|
Robert A. Mathewson |
|
|
301,830,490 |
|
|
|
4,488,755 |
|
Thomas J. Matthews |
|
|
291,868,231 |
|
|
|
14,451,014 |
|
Robert Miller |
|
|
301,410,674 |
|
|
|
4,908,571 |
|
Frederick B. Rentschler |
|
|
290,569,687 |
|
|
|
15,749,557 |
|
(c) |
|
At the meeting, stockholders also ratified the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as
IGTs independent auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007. The number of
shares voted for the appointment totaled 288,502,786 with 14,711,689 shares against, 3,104,769
shares abstaining and no broker non-votes. |
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6.Exhibits
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Retirement Agreement with Maureen Mullarkey, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer dated February 21, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2007) |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Summary of Named Executive Officer and Director Compensation Arrangements at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
32
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 4, 2007
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
|
|
|
By: /s/ Maureen Mullarkey
Maureen T. Mullarkey
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
International Game Technology |
|
|
33
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Retirement Agreement with Maureen Mullarkey, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer dated February 21, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2007) |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Summary of Named Executive Officer and Director Compensation Arrangements at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
34