e8vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 4, 2009
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
001-32318
(Commission File Number)
|
|
73-1567067
(IRS Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
20 NORTH BROADWAY, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
|
|
73102 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (405) 235-3611
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 8.01. Other Events
We are providing our 2009 forward-looking estimates in this report. These estimates are based
on our examination of historical operating trends, the information used to prepare our December 31,
2008 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties. A summary of
these forward-looking estimates is included at the end of this report.
Definitions
This report includes references to various abbreviations relating to volumetric production
terms and other defined terms. These abbreviations and terms are defined as follows:
Bbl or Bbls means barrel or barrels.
Bbls/d means barrels per day.
Bcf means billion cubic feet.
Boe means barrel of oil equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs
to six Mcf of gas.
Btu means British thermal units, a measure of heating value.
Federal Funds Rate means the interest rate at which depository institutions lend balances at
the Federal Reserve to other depository institutions overnight.
Inside FERC refers to the publication Inside F.E.R.C.s Gas Market Report.
LIBOR means London Interbank Offered Rate.
MMBbls means million Bbls.
MMBoe means million Boe.
MMBtu means million Btu.
MMBtu/d means million Btu per day.
Mcf means thousand cubic feet.
MMcf means million cubic feet.
NGL or NGLs means natural gas liquids.
NYMEX means New York Mercantile Exchange.
Oil includes crude oil and condensate.
Forward-Looking Estimates
General Assumptions and Risks Related to Our Estimates
We caution that our future oil, gas and NGL production, revenues and expenses are subject to
all of the risks and uncertainties normally associated with exploring for, developing, producing
and selling oil, gas and NGLs. These risks include, but are not limited to, price volatility,
inflation or lack of availability of goods and services, environmental risks, drilling risks,
regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in
2
estimating future oil and gas production or reserves, and other risks discussed below.
Additionally, we caution that our future marketing and midstream revenues and expenses are
subject to all of the risks and uncertainties normally associated with transporting oil, gas and
NGLs and processing natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, price volatility,
environmental risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating future processing
volumes and pipeline throughput, cost of goods and services and other risks discussed below.
Also, the financial results of our foreign operations are subject to currency exchange rate
risks. Unless otherwise noted, all of the following dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars.
Financial amounts related to our Canadian operations have been converted to U.S. dollars using an
estimated average 2009 exchange rate of $0.80 dollar to $1.00 Canadian dollar. The actual 2009
exchange rate may vary materially from this estimate. Such variations could have a material effect
on these forward-looking estimates.
Other specific risks associated with our price and production estimates are provided
immediately below. Additional risks are discussed throughout this report in the context of line
items most affected by such risks.
Specific Assumptions and Risks Related to Price and Production Estimates
Prices for oil, gas and NGLs are determined primarily by prevailing market conditions. Market
conditions for these products are influenced by regional and worldwide economic conditions, weather
and other local market conditions. These factors are beyond our control and are difficult to
predict. In addition, volatility in general oil, gas and NGL prices may vary considerably due to
differences between regional markets, differing quality of oil produced (i.e., sweet crude versus
heavy or sour crude), differing Btu content of gas produced, transportation availability and costs
and demand for the various products derived from oil, gas and NGLs. Substantially all of our
revenues are attributable to sales, processing and transportation of these three commodities.
Consequently, our financial results and resources are highly influenced by price volatility.
Although we expect this volatility to continue throughout 2009, we expect 2009 oil, gas and NGL
prices will be noticeably lower than those for 2008.
Estimates for future production of oil, gas and NGLs are based on the assumption that market
demand and prices for oil, gas and NGLs will continue at levels that allow for profitable discovery
and production of these products. There can be no assurance of such stability. Most of our Canadian
production of oil, gas and NGLs is subject to government royalties that fluctuate with prices.
Thus, price fluctuations can affect reported production. Also, our production of oil in Azerbaijan
and China is governed by payout agreements with the governments of these countries. If the payout
under these agreements is attained earlier than projected, our net production and proved reserves
in such areas could be reduced.
Estimates for future processing and transport of oil, gas and NGLs are based on the assumption
that market demand and prices for oil, gas and NGLs will continue at levels that allow for
profitable processing and transport of these products. There can be no assurance of such stability.
The production, transportation, processing and marketing of oil, gas and NGLs are complex
processes which are subject to disruption due to transportation and processing availability,
mechanical failure, human error, hurricanes and other meteorological events, and numerous other
factors. The forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand, curtailment,
producibility and general market conditions for our oil, gas and NGLs during 2009 will be
substantially similar to those that existed in 2008, unless otherwise noted.
Geographic Reporting Areas
Our estimates of production, average price differentials compared to industry benchmarks and
capital expenditures included in this report are provided separately for each of the following
geographic areas:
|
|
|
the United States Onshore; |
3
|
|
|
the United States Offshore, which encompasses all oil and gas properties in the Gulf
of Mexico; |
|
|
|
|
Canada; and |
|
|
|
|
International, which encompasses all oil and gas properties that lie outside of the
United States and Canada. |
Year 2009 Potential Operating Items
Oil, Gas and NGL Production
Set forth below are our estimates of oil, gas and NGL production for 2009. We estimate that
our combined 2009 oil, gas and NGL production will total approximately 235 to 241 MMBoe. Of this
total, approximately 97% is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as proved at
December 31, 2008. The following estimates for oil, gas and NGL production are calculated at the
midpoint of the estimated range for total production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
Gas |
|
NGLs |
|
Total |
|
|
(MMBbls) |
|
(Bcf) |
|
(MMBbls) |
|
(MMBoe) |
United States Onshore |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
United States Offshore |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Canada |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
International |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Prices
We expect our 2009 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating
areas to differ from the NYMEX price as set forth in the following table. The expected ranges for
gas prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the gas financial contracts presented in the
Commodity Price Risk Management section below.
The NYMEX price for oil is the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for
benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude oil delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma. The NYMEX price for gas
is determined to be the first-of-month South Louisiana Henry Hub price index as published monthly
in Inside FERC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Range of Prices |
|
|
as a % of NYMEX Price |
|
|
Oil |
|
Gas |
United States Onshore |
|
85% to 95% |
|
75% to 85% |
United States Offshore |
|
95% to 105% |
|
100% to 110% |
Canada |
|
55% to 65% |
|
83% to 93% |
International |
|
85% to 95% |
|
|
N/M |
|
Commodity
Price Risk Management
From time to time, we enter into NYMEX related financial commodity collar and price swap
contracts. Such contracts are used to manage the inherent uncertainty of future revenues due to oil
and gas price
4
volatility. Although these financial contracts do not relate to specific production from our
operating areas, they will affect our overall revenues, earnings and cash flow in 2009.
As of February 3, 2009, our financial commodity contracts pertaining to 2009 consisted only of
gas collars. The key terms of these contracts are presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor Price |
|
Ceiling Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor |
|
Average |
|
Ceiling |
|
Average |
|
|
Volume |
|
Range |
|
Price |
|
Range |
|
Price |
Period |
|
(MMBtu/d) |
|
($/MMBtu) |
|
($/MMBtu) |
|
($/MMBtu) |
|
($/MMBtu) |
First Quarter |
|
|
277,056 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 - $8.50 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
10.60 - $14.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.02 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 - $8.50 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
10.60 - $14.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 - $8.50 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
10.60 - $14.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 - $8.50 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
10.60 - $14.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
2009 Average |
|
|
267,973 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 - $8.50 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
10.60 - $14.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
To the extent that monthly NYMEX prices in 2009 are outside of the ranges established by the
gas collars, we and the counterparties to the contracts will settle the difference. Such
settlements will either increase or decrease our revenues for the period. Also, we will
mark-to-market the contracts based on their fair values throughout 2009. Changes in the contracts
fair values will also be recorded as increases or decreases to our revenues. The expected ranges of
our realized gas prices as a percentage of NYMEX prices, which are presented earlier in this
report, do not include any estimates of the impact on our gas prices from monthly settlements or
changes in the fair values of our gas collars.
In January 2009, we entered into an early settlement arrangement with one of our
counterparties. As a result of this early settlement, we received $36 million in January 2009.
Marketing and Midstream Revenues and Expenses
Marketing and midstream revenues and expenses are derived primarily from our gas processing
plants and gas pipeline systems. These revenues and expenses vary in response to several factors.
The factors include, but are not limited to, changes in production from wells connected to the
pipelines and related processing plants, changes in the absolute and relative prices of gas and
NGLs, provisions of contractual agreements and the amount of repair and maintenance activity
required to maintain anticipated processing levels and pipeline throughput volumes.
These factors increase the uncertainty inherent in estimating future marketing and midstream
revenues and expenses. Given these uncertainties, we estimate that our 2009 marketing and midstream
operating profit will be between $375 million and $425 million. We estimate that marketing and
midstream revenues will be between $1.075 billion and $1.425 billion, and marketing and midstream
expenses will be between $0.700 billion and $1.000 billion.
Production and Operating Expenses
Our production and operating expenses include lease operating expenses, transportation costs
and production taxes. These expenses vary in response to several factors. Among the most
significant of these factors are additions to or deletions from the property base, changes in the
general price level of services and materials that are used in the operation of the properties, the
amount of repair and workover activity required and changes in production tax rates. Oil, gas and
NGL prices also have an effect on lease operating expenses and impact the economic feasibility of
planned workover projects.
Given these uncertainties, we expect that our 2009 lease operating expenses will be between
$1.93 billion and $2.27 billion. Additionally, we estimate that our production taxes for 2009 will
be between 3.25% and 3.75% of total oil, gas and NGL revenues, excluding the effect on revenues
from financial collar contracts upon which production taxes are not assessed.
5
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A)
Our 2009 oil and gas property DD&A rate will depend on various factors. Most notable among
such factors are the amount of proved reserves that will be added from drilling or acquisition
efforts in 2009 compared to the costs incurred for such efforts and revisions to our year-end 2008
reserve estimates that, based on prior experience, are likely to be made during 2009. Our reserve
estimates as of December 31, 2008 included negative price revisions of 473 MMBoe. The following oil
and gas property related DD&A estimates are largely based on the assumption that the year-end 2008
negative price revisions will not reverse during 2009. However, if such negative price revisions
reverse, in whole or in part, our actual oil and gas property related DD&A rate could vary
materially from our estimate.
Given these uncertainties, we estimate that our oil and gas property related DD&A rate will be
between $10.25 per Boe and $10.75 per Boe. Based on these DD&A rates and the production estimates
set forth earlier, oil and gas property related DD&A expense for 2009 is expected to be between
$2.44 billion and $2.56 billion.
Additionally, we expect that our depreciation and amortization expense related to non-oil and
gas property fixed assets will total between $315 million and $335 million in 2008.
Accretion of Asset Retirement Obligation
Accretion of asset retirement obligation in 2009 is expected to be between $85 million and $95
million.
General and Administrative Expenses (G&A)
Our G&A includes employee compensation and benefits costs and the costs of many different
goods and services used in support of our business. G&A varies with the level of our operating
activities and the related staffing and professional services requirements. In addition, employee
compensation and benefits costs vary due to various market factors that affect the level and type
of compensation and benefits offered to employees. Also, goods and services are subject to general
price level increases or decreases. Therefore, significant variances in any of these factors from
current expectations could cause actual G&A to vary materially from the estimate.
Given these limitations, we estimate our G&A for 2009 will be between $565 million and $605
million. This estimate includes approximately $110 million of non-cash, share-based compensation,
net of related capitalization in accordance with the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas
properties.
Reduction of Carrying Value of Oil and Gas Properties
We follow the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas properties. Under the full
cost method, our net book value of oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes (the
costs to be recovered), may not exceed a calculated full cost ceiling. The ceiling limitation
is the discounted estimated after-tax future net revenues from oil and gas properties plus the cost
of unevaluated properties. The ceiling is imposed separately by country. In calculating future net
revenues, current prices and costs used are those as of the end of the appropriate quarterly
period. These prices are not changed except where different prices are fixed and determinable from
applicable contracts for the remaining term of those contracts. The costs to be recovered are
compared to the ceiling on a quarterly basis. If the costs to be recovered exceed the ceiling, the
excess is written off as an expense. An expense recorded in one period may not be reversed in a
subsequent period even though higher oil and gas prices may have increased the ceiling applicable
to the subsequent period.
Because the ceiling calculation dictates that prices in effect as of the last day of the
applicable quarter are held constant indefinitely, and requires a 10% discount factor, the
resulting value is not indicative of the true fair value of the reserves. Oil and gas prices have
historically been cyclical and, on any particular day at the end of a quarter, can be either
substantially higher or lower than our long-term price forecast, which
6
is a more appropriate input for estimating fair value. Therefore, oil and gas property
writedowns that result from applying the full cost ceiling limitation, and that are caused by
fluctuations in price as opposed to reductions to the underlying quantities of reserves, should not
be viewed as absolute indicators of a reduction of the ultimate value of the related reserves.
Because of the volatile nature of oil and gas prices, it is not possible to predict whether we
will incur full cost writedowns in 2009. However, such writedowns may be more likely to occur
during 2009 than in recent periods, considering current and near-term estimates of oil and gas
prices.
We recognized full cost ceiling writedowns related to our oil and gas properties in the United
States, Canada and Brazil in the fourth quarter of 2008. These writedowns resulted primarily from
significant declines in oil and gas prices compared to previous quarter-end prices. The December
31, 2008 weighted average wellhead prices for these countries are presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country |
|
Oil |
|
Gas |
|
NGLs |
United States |
|
$ |
42.21 |
|
|
$ |
4.68 |
|
|
$ |
16.16 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
23.23 |
|
|
$ |
5.31 |
|
|
$ |
20.89 |
|
Brazil |
|
$ |
26.61 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The wellhead prices in the table above compare to the December 31, 2008 NYMEX cash price of
$44.60 per Bbl for crude oil and the Henry Hub spot price of $5.71 per MMBtu for natural gas.
Should 2009 quarter-end prices approximate or decrease from these December 31, 2008 prices, the
likelihood that we will incur full cost writedowns during 2009 will increase.
Interest Expense
Future interest rates and debt outstanding have a significant effect on our interest expense.
We can only marginally influence the prices we will receive in 2009 from sales of oil, gas and NGLs
and the resulting cash flow. This increases the margin of error inherent in estimating future
outstanding debt balances and related interest expense. Other factors which affect outstanding debt
balances and related interest expense, such as the amount and timing of capital expenditures are
generally within our control.
As of January 31, 2009, we had total debt of $6.2 billion. This included $6.0 billion of
fixed-rate debt and $0.2 billion of variable-rate commercial paper borrowings. The fixed-rate debt
bears interest at an overall weighted average rate of 7.23%. The commercial paper borrowings bear
interest at variable rates based on a standard index such as the Federal Funds Rate, LIBOR, or the
money market rate as found on the commercial paper market. As of January 31, 2009, the weighted
average variable rate for our commercial paper borrowings was 3.33%. Additionally, any future
borrowings under our credit facilities would bear interest at various fixed-rate options for
periods up to twelve months and are generally less than the prime rate.
7
Based on the factors above, we expect our 2009 interest expense to be between $330 million and
$340 million. This estimate assumes no material changes in prevailing interest rates or to our
existing interest rate swap contracts presented above. This estimate also assumes that our total
debt will increase approximately $1.0 billion during 2009, primarily in the form of commercial
paper borrowings.
The 2009 interest expense estimate above is comprised of three primary components interest
related to outstanding debt, fees and issuance costs, and capitalized interest. We expect the
interest expense in 2009 related to our fixed-rate and floating-rate debt, including net accretion
of related discounts, to be between $435 million and $445 million. We expect the interest expense
in 2009 related to facility and agency fees, amortization of debt issuance costs and other
miscellaneous items not related to outstanding debt balances to be between $5 million and $15
million. We also expect to capitalize between $110 million and $120 million of interest during
2009.
Interest Rate Risk Management
We also have interest rate swaps to mitigate a portion of the fair value effects of interest
rate fluctuations on our fixed-rate debt. Under the terms of these swaps, we receive a fixed rate
and pay a variable rate on a total notional amount of $1.05 billion. The key terms of these
interest rate swaps are presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Variable |
|
|
Notional |
|
Received |
|
Rate Paid |
|
Expiration |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
Federal funds rate |
|
July 18, 2013 |
$ |
300 |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
Six month LIBOR |
|
July 18, 2011 |
$ |
250 |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
Federal funds rate |
|
July 22, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including the effects of these swaps, the weighted-average interest rate related to our
fixed-rate debt was 6.64% as of January 31, 2009.
Income Taxes
Our financial income tax rate in 2009 will vary materially depending on the actual amount of
financial pre-tax earnings. The tax rate for 2009 will be significantly affected by the
proportional share of consolidated pre-tax earnings generated by U.S., Canadian and International
operations due to the different tax rates of each country. There are certain tax deductions and
credits that will have a fixed impact on 2009 income tax expense regardless of the level of pre-tax
earnings that are produced.
Given the uncertainty of pre-tax earnings, we expect that our consolidated financial income
tax rate in 2009 will be between 20% and 40%. The current income tax rate is expected to be between
10% and 20%. The deferred income tax rate is expected to be between 10% and 20%. Significant
changes in estimated capital expenditures, production levels of oil, gas and NGLs, the prices of
such products, marketing and midstream revenues, or any of the various expense items could
materially alter the effect of the aforementioned tax deductions and credits on 2009 financial
income tax rates.
Year 2008 Potential Capital Resources, Uses and Liquidity
Capital Expenditures
Though we have completed several major property acquisitions in recent years, these
transactions are opportunity driven. Thus, we do not budget, nor can we reasonably predict, the
timing or size of such possible acquisitions.
Our capital expenditures budget is based on an expected range of future oil, gas and NGL
prices as well as the expected costs of the capital additions. Should actual prices received differ
materially from our price expectations for our future production, some projects may be accelerated
or deferred and, consequently, may increase or decrease total 2009 capital expenditures. In
addition, if the actual material or labor costs of the budgeted items vary significantly from the
anticipated amounts, actual capital expenditures could vary materially from our estimates.
Given the limitations discussed above, the following table shows expected ranges for drilling,
development and facilities expenditures by geographic area. Development capital includes
development activity related to reserves classified as proved and drilling that does not offset
currently productive units and for which there is not a certainty of continued production from a
known productive formation. Exploration capital includes exploratory drilling to find and produce
oil or gas in previously untested fault blocks or new reservoirs.
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States |
|
|
States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Development capital |
|
$ |
1,520 -$1,790 |
|
|
$ |
460-$540 |
|
|
$ |
740-$870 |
|
|
$ |
160-$200 |
|
|
$ |
2,880-$3,400 |
|
Exploration capital |
|
$ |
150-$170 |
|
|
$ |
130-$150 |
|
|
$ |
40-$50 |
|
|
$ |
200-$230 |
|
|
$ |
520-$600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,670-$1,960 |
|
|
$ |
590-$690 |
|
|
$ |
780-$920 |
|
|
$ |
360-$430 |
|
|
$ |
3,400-$4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the above expenditures for drilling, development and facilities, we expect to
spend between $325 million to $425 million on our marketing and midstream assets, which primarily
include our oil pipelines, gas processing plants, and gas pipeline systems. Additionally, we expect
to capitalize between $460 million and $480 million of G&A expenses in accordance with the full
cost method of accounting and to capitalize between $110 million and $120 million of interest. We
also expect to pay between $105 million and $115 million for plugging and abandonment charges, and
to spend between $230 million and $250 million for other non-oil and gas property fixed assets. We
anticipate spending between $40 million and $50 million to fulfill drilling commitments related to
our assets held for sale.
Other Cash Uses
Our management expects the policy of paying a quarterly common stock dividend to continue.
With the current $0.16 per share quarterly dividend rate and 444 million shares of common stock
outstanding as of December 31, 2008, dividends are expected to approximate $284 million.
We have various defined benefit pension plans. The vast majority of these plans are subject to
minimum funding requirements. During 2008, investment losses significantly reduced the funded
status of these plans. Accordingly, our 2009 contributions to these plans are expected to be
significantly higher than those made in recent years. Depending on the funding targets we may
attempt to achieve, we estimate we will contribute between $100 million and $175 million to our
pension plans during 2009.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our estimated 2009 cash uses, including our drilling and development activities and retirement
of maturing debt, are expected to be funded primarily through a combination of our existing cash
balances and operating cash flow. Any remaining cash uses could be funded by increasing our
borrowings under our commercial paper program or with borrowings from the available capacity under
our credit facilities, which was approximately $3.1 billion as of January 31, 2009. The amount of
operating cash flow to be generated during 2009 is uncertain due to the factors affecting revenues
and expenses as previously cited. However, we expect our combined capital resources to be adequate
to fund our anticipated capital expenditures and other cash uses for 2009.
If significant other acquisitions or other unplanned capital requirements arise during the
year, we could utilize our existing credit facilities and/or seek to establish and utilize other
sources of financing.
9
Summary of 2009 Forward-Looking Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
Oil production (MMBbls) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
12 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
4 |
|
Canada |
|
|
29 |
|
International |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas production (Bcf) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
676 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
42 |
|
Canada |
|
|
185 |
|
International |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL production (MMBbls) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
25 |
|
Canada |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production (MMBoe) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
149 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
11 |
|
Canada |
|
|
63 |
|
International |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As % of NYMEX Range |
|
|
Low |
|
High |
Oil Operating Area Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
105 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
International |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Operating Area Prices 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
110 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
The expected ranges for our operating area prices as a percentage of NYMEX prices do
not include any estimates of the impact on our gas prices from monthly settlements or changes
in the fair values of our gas price collars as presented on page 5. |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
Marketing and midstream (In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
Expenses |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production and operating expenses ($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOE |
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DD&A (In millions, except per Boe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas DD&A |
|
$ |
2,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
Non-oil and gas DD&A |
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total DD&A |
|
$ |
2,755 |
|
|
$ |
2,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas DD&A per Boe |
|
$ |
10.25 |
|
|
$ |
10.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of ARO |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
G&A |
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Deferred |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax rate |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range |
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Development capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
International |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,880 |
|
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
International |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total drilling and facility capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
International |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing & midstream |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
Capitalized G&A |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
Plugging and abandonment |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
Non-oil and gas |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,270 |
|
|
$ |
1,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Danny J. Heatly
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Accounting and |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: February 4, 2009
13