e6vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
29
May 2007
Commission File Number 001-09159
NORSK HYDRO ASA
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Drammensveien 264, Vækerø
N-0240 OSLO
Norway
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F:
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934:
Yes o No þ
(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82 ___)
Hydro Information Memorandum
Information Memorandum
In connection with the demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA,
and the merger of Norsk Hydro ASAs petroleum activities with Statoil ASA
This Information Memorandum does not constitute an offer to sell
or the solicitation of an
offer to buy any securities
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
1 Important notice |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 Terms and definitions |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 Summary |
|
|
5 |
|
|
4 Description of Hydro prior to the Demerger |
|
|
6 |
|
|
5 The demerger of Hydro and the merger of Hydro Petroleum with Statoil |
|
|
7 |
|
|
6 Hydro after the Demerger |
|
|
8 |
|
|
6.1 Introduction, summary business information, strategy |
|
|
8 |
|
6.1.1 Introduction |
|
|
8 |
|
6.1.2 Summary business information |
|
|
8 |
|
6.1.2.1 Aluminium Metal |
|
|
8 |
|
6.1.2.2 Aluminium Products |
|
|
9 |
|
6.1.2.3 Power |
|
|
9 |
|
6.1.2.4 Other |
|
|
9 |
|
6.1.3 Strategy |
|
|
10 |
|
6.1.3.1 Aluminium Metal |
|
|
10 |
|
6.1.3.2 Aluminium Products |
|
|
10 |
|
6.1.3.3 Power |
|
|
11 |
|
6.1.3.4 Other |
|
|
11 |
|
6.2 Business overview |
|
|
12 |
|
6.2.1 Aluminium Metal |
|
|
12 |
|
6.2.1.1 Industry overview |
|
|
12 |
|
6.2.1.2 Primary aluminium production |
|
|
13 |
|
6.2.1.3 Raw materials |
|
|
16 |
|
6.2.1.4 Casthouse products and remelt activities |
|
|
17 |
|
6.2.1.5 Sales, distribution and trading activities |
|
|
17 |
|
6.2.1.6 High purity aluminium |
|
|
18 |
|
6.2.1.7 Projects |
|
|
18 |
|
6.2.2 Aluminium Products |
|
|
18 |
|
6.2.2.1 Industry overview |
|
|
18 |
|
6.2.2.2 Operational information |
|
|
19 |
|
6.2.2.3 Rolled Products |
|
|
20 |
|
6.2.2.4 Extrusion |
|
|
21 |
|
6.2.2.5 Automotive |
|
|
22 |
|
6.2.3 Power |
|
|
23 |
|
6.2.4 Other |
|
|
23 |
|
6.2.4.1 Polymers |
|
|
23 |
|
6.2.4.2 Other |
|
|
25 |
|
6.2.5
Subsequent events |
|
|
25 |
|
6.3 Regulation and taxation |
|
|
26 |
|
6.3.1 Aluminium regulation |
|
|
26 |
|
6.3.2 Power taxation |
|
|
28 |
|
6.3.3 Other regulation |
|
|
29 |
|
6.4 Financial review |
|
|
29 |
|
6.4.1 Introduction |
|
|
29 |
|
6.4.2 Overview, operating income, outlook |
|
|
30 |
|
6.4.2.1 Aluminium Metal |
|
|
30 |
|
6.4.2.2 Aluminium Products |
|
|
32 |
|
6.4.3 Aluminium Metal |
|
|
34 |
|
6.4.3.1 Market conditions |
|
|
34 |
|
6.4.3.2 Key development projects |
|
|
35 |
|
6.4.3.3 Plant closures |
|
|
35 |
|
6.4.3.4 Revenues, costs and income |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4.4 Aluminium Products |
|
|
38 |
|
6.4.4.1 Market conditions |
|
|
38 |
|
6.4.4.2 Key development activities |
|
|
39 |
|
6.4.4.3 Plant closures |
|
|
39 |
|
6.4.4.4 Revenues, costs and income |
|
|
40 |
|
6.4.5 Power |
|
|
43 |
|
6.4.6 Other |
|
|
43 |
|
6.4.6.1 Polymers |
|
|
43 |
|
6.4.6.2 Other |
|
|
43 |
|
6.5 Financial information |
|
|
44 |
|
6.5.1 Hydro After Demerger basis for presentation |
|
|
44 |
|
6.5.2 Hydro After Demerger financial information |
|
|
47 |
|
6.5.3 Independent accountants report for Hydro After Demerger |
|
|
49 |
|
6.5.4 Name and address of Hydros auditors for the last three years |
|
|
49 |
|
6.5.5 Other financial information |
|
|
50 |
|
6.6 Organization, Board of Directors and management |
|
|
54 |
|
6.6.1 Legal form, address and business register number |
|
|
54 |
|
6.6.2 Legal structure |
|
|
54 |
|
6.6.3 Management |
|
|
54 |
|
6.6.4 Board of Directors |
|
|
58 |
|
6.6.5 Corporate Assembly |
|
|
59 |
|
6.6.6 Related party transactions |
|
|
60 |
|
6.6.7 Corporate governance |
|
|
62 |
|
6.6.8 Legal and arbitration proceedings |
|
|
62 |
|
6.6.9 Material contracts |
|
|
62 |
|
7 Risk factors related to the business of Hydro after the Demerger |
|
|
63 |
|
|
8 Share capital |
|
|
68 |
|
|
8.1 Share capital prior to and after the Demerger |
|
|
68 |
|
8.2 Share capital development in the last three years |
|
|
69 |
|
|
9
Signatures |
|
|
70 |
|
|
1
Hydro Information Memorandum
1 Important notice
This information memorandum (the Information Memorandum) has been prepared in connection
with the demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA and the merger of Hydros demerged petroleum activities with
Statoil ASA (the Merger). No shares or other securities are being offered or sold in any
jurisdiction pursuant to this Information Memorandum.
On 12 March 2007 the Board of Directors of Norsk Hydro ASA (Hydro) adopted the plan for the
demerger of Hydro and the merger of Hydros demerged petroleum
activities (Hydro Petroleum) with
Statoil (the Merger Plan). Correspondingly, the Board of Directors of Statoil ASA (Statoil)
adopted the Merger Plan on 13 March 2007.
The Merger Plan will be submitted for approval by the shareholders of Hydro and Statoil at extraordinary general
meetings that will be held on a date indicated in separate notices provided to Hydros and Statoils shareholders. If the
shareholders of Hydro and Statoil approve the Merger Plan and the other conditions precedent to consummation of the
Merger are satisfied or, where applicable, waived, the Merger is expected to be consummated in September or October
2007.
In connection with the extraordinary general meetings of Hydro and Statoil mentioned above, the issuance of Statoil
ordinary shares to Hydro shareholders in the Merger and the listing of these shares on the Oslo Stock Exchange, Statoil
has prepared (i) a circular/prospectus which has been filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) on Form F-4, expected to be declared effective in the end of May/beginning of June 2007 (the US
Prospectus) and (ii) a circular/prospectus which has been prepared in reliance on the exemptions of the Norwegian
Securities Trading Act section 5-5 no 5 and which has been reviewed, but not approved by the Oslo Stock Exchange (the
International Prospectus). The International Prospectus has been based on the US Prospectus, and its content is
identical to the US Prospectus with minor exceptions which are described in the International Prospectus. The US
Prospectus and the International Prospectus are together referred to as Statoils Prospectus.
This Information Memorandum has been prepared to provide a description of Hydro after the Demerger in accordance
with the Merger Plan (the Demerger). A version of this Information Memorandum, dated 20 March 2007, was made
public simultaneously with Statoils filing of its prospectus and registration statement on Form F-4 that was subject to
review by the SEC (Statoils Preliminary Form F-4 Registration Statement). Compared to the 20 March 2007 version,
this Information Memorandum, dated 24 May 2007, has basically been amended as follows:
The Information Memorandum refers to Statoils Prospectus instead of Statoils Preliminary Form F-4 Registration
Statement dated 20 March 2007
Necessary updates have been made to chapter 1 Important Notice and chapter 2 Terms and definitions
We have included information on events relating to section 6.2 Business overview occurring subsequent to the
version of this document that was dated 20 March 2007 in a new section 6.2.5 Subsequent events.
Section 6.6.3 Management has been updated with recent announcements to Hydros Corporate Management
Board
Section 6.6.4 Board of Directors has been updated with recent announcements to Hydros Board of Directors
Section 6.6.5 Corporate Assembly has been updated with recent announcements to Hydros Corporate Assembly
Section 8.1 Share Capital prior to and after the Demerger and section 8.2 Share capital development have been
updated with information related to shares issued to Hydro employees
Except for sections 6.2.5 Subsequent events, 6.4.1 Financial review - Introduction, 6.5 Financial information and 6.6
Organization, Board of Directors and management, the content of chapter 6 Hydro after the Demerger in this
Information Memorandum is primarily sourced from Hydros Annual Report 2006. See section 6.5.1 Financial information
- Hydro After Demerger basis for presentation for a discussion of the accounting treatment used as a basis for the
financial information included in sections 6.4.1 and 6.5. The Information Memorandum has not been subject to review or approval by the Oslo Stock Exchange.
For the description of the Merger, the Merger Plan, the Merged Company, Hydro Petroleum and risks related to Hydro
Petroleum and the Merger of Hydro Petroleum with Statoil, this document refers to Statoils Prospectus.
All inquiries relating to this Information Memorandum must be directed to Hydro. No other person is
authorized to give any information about or to make any representations on behalf of Hydro in
connection with the Merger. If any such information is given or made, it must not be relied upon as
having been authorized by Hydro. The information contained herein is as of the date hereof and is
subject to change, completion and amendment without further notice. The delivery of this
Information Memorandum shall not imply that there has been no change in Hydros affairs or that the
information set forth herein is correct as of any date subsequent to the date hereof.
The contents of this Information Memorandum are not to be construed as legal, business or tax
advice. Each reader of this Information Memorandum should consult with his or her own legal,
business or tax advisor as to legal, business or tax advice. If you are in any doubt about the
contents of this Information Memorandum you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, lawyer,
accountant or other professional adviser.
The distribution of this Information Memorandum in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law.
Hydro requires persons in possession of this Information Memorandum to inform themselves about, and
to observe, any such restrictions.
Hydro Information Memorandum
2
Cautionary note regarding forward-looking information
Certain statements included within this Information Memorandum contain forward-looking information,
including, without limitation, those relating to (a) forecasts, projections and estimates, (b)
statements of managements plans, objectives and strategies for Hydro, such as planned expansions,
investments or other projects, (c) targeted cost reductions and profit objectives, (d) various
expectations about future developments in Hydros markets, particularly prices, supply and demand
and competition, (e) results of operations, (f) margins, (g) growth rates, (h) risk management, as
well as (i) statements preceded by expected, scheduled, targeted, planned, proposed,
intended or similar statements. Although Hydro believes that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, these forward-looking statements are based on a number
of assumptions and forecasts that, by their nature, involve risk and uncertainty. Various factors
could cause Hydros actual results to differ materially from those projected in a forward-looking
statement or affect the extent to which a particular projection is realized. Factors that could
cause these differences include, but are not limited to, world economic growth and other economic
indicators, including rates of inflation and industrial production, trends in Hydros key markets,
and global aluminium supply and demand conditions, as well as the risk factors specified in this
Information Memorandum under Risk Factors Related to the Business of Hydro after the Demerger. No
assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Hydro disclaims any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
3
Hydro Information Memorandum
2 Terms and definitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
Definition |
|
|
AluNorf
|
|
|
Aluminium Norf GmbH |
|
|
BAT
|
|
|
Best Available Techniques for pollution prevention and control |
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Norsk Hydro ASA, a Norwegian public company limited by shares, or Norsk Hydro ASA
and its consolidated subsidiaries, as the context requires |
|
|
Corporate Assembly
|
|
|
The corporate assembly, a body contemplated by Norwegian companies law, with
responsibility, among other things, for the election of the members of the Companys
Board of Directors and nomination of the external auditor |
|
|
Corporate
Management Board
|
|
|
The corporate management board established by the Companys President and Chief
Executive Officer to assist him in discharging his responsibilities |
|
|
Demerger
|
|
|
The demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA in accordance with the Merger Plan |
|
|
EEA
|
|
|
European Economic Area |
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
|
1 January 2007, the financial effective date of the Demerger and the Merger |
|
|
EFTA
|
|
|
European Free Trade Association |
|
|
EU
|
|
|
European Union |
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
Extraordinary
General Meeting
|
|
|
Hydros extraordinary general meeting, to be held on a date indicated on a separate notice to Hydros
shareholders, at which Hydros shareholders will vote on the approval of the Merger Plan
|
|
|
Hydro
|
|
|
Norsk Hydro ASA or Norsk Hydro ASA and its consolidated subsidiaries, as the context
requires |
|
|
Hydro After
Demerger
|
|
|
Hydro after the demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA in accordance with the Merger Plan |
|
|
Hydro Petroleum
|
|
|
Hydros petroleum activities being demerged from Hydro and merged with Statoil as
further defined in section 2.1 of the Merger Plan |
|
|
International
Prospectus
|
|
|
Statoils circular/prospectus which has been prepared in reliance on the exemptions of the Norwegian
Securities Trading Act section 5-5 no 5 and which has been reviewed, but not approved by the Oslo
Stock Exchange. The International Prospectus has been based on the US Prospectus, and its content
is identical to the US Prospectus with minor exceptions which are described in the International
Prospectus |
|
|
kWh
|
|
|
Kilowatt hour |
|
|
LME
|
|
|
London Metal Exchange |
|
|
Merged Company
|
|
|
The company resulting from the Merger. The name of the Merged Company, effective
upon the completion of the merger, shall be StatoilHydro. However, the board of
directors of the Merged Company shall develop a new name and a new logo which shall
symbolize the companys business strategy, values and vision, and which shall be
different from the present companies names. |
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
The demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA and the simultaneous merger of Hydros demerged
petroleum activities with Statoil ASA |
|
|
Merger Plan
|
|
|
The plan for the demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA and the merger of Hydros demerged
petroleum activities with Statoil ASA adopted by the Boards of Directors of Hydro
and Statoil on 12 March and 13 March 2007 respectively |
|
|
NCS
|
|
|
Norwegian Continental Shelf |
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Natural gas liquids |
|
|
NOK
|
|
|
Norwegian kroner |
|
|
NYSE
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term |
|
|
Definition |
|
|
OSE
|
|
|
Oslo Stock Exchange |
|
|
PFC
|
|
|
Perfluorocarbon |
|
|
P-PVC
|
|
|
Paste PVC |
|
|
PVC
|
|
|
Polyvinyl chloride, a plastic raw material |
|
|
R&D
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
SFT
|
|
|
Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (Statens forurensningstilsyn) |
|
|
S-PVC
|
|
|
Suspension PVC |
|
|
Statoil
|
|
|
Statoil ASA or Statoil ASA and its consolidated subsidiaries, as the context requires |
|
|
Statoils
Prospectus
|
|
|
Together, the US Prospectus and the International Prospectus are referred to as Statoils Prospectus |
|
|
Statoils
Preliminary Form
F-4 Registration
Statement
|
|
|
Statoils Form F-4 registration statement, as filed with the SEC on 20 March 2007, that was subject to
review by the SEC |
|
|
mt
|
|
|
One metric ton (1,000 kilograms or approximately 2,205 pounds) |
|
|
TRI
|
|
|
Total recordable injuries |
|
|
TWh
|
|
|
Terawatt hour (one billion kilowatt hours) |
|
|
USD
|
|
|
US dollar |
|
|
US GAAP
|
|
|
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States |
|
|
US Prospectus
|
|
|
Statoils circular/prospectus which has been filed with the SEC on Form F-4, expected to be declared
effective in the end of May/beginning of June 2007 |
|
|
VAW
|
|
|
VAW Aluminium AG |
|
|
VCM
|
|
|
Vinyl chloride monomer, the main raw material for PVC |
|
|
VPS or VPS System
|
|
|
The Norwegian Central Securities Depository, Verdipapirsentralen. |
|
|
WTO
|
|
|
World Trade Organization |
|
|
5
Hydro Information Memorandum
This summary highlights selected information that is described in greater detail elsewhere in
this information memorandum. This summary does not contain all of the important information
included in this document. You should read this entire information memorandum and other documents
referred to in this information memorandum for a more complete understanding.
Description of Hydro prior to the Demerger
Hydro is a Fortune 500 energy and aluminium company with 33,000 employees in nearly 40 countries.
We are a leading offshore producer of oil and gas, a major aluminium supplier and a leader in the
development of renewable energy sources. Our mission is to strengthen the viability of the
customers and communities we serve.
The demerger of Hydro and the merger of Hydro Petroleum with Statoil
On 12 March 2007 the Board
of Directors of Hydro adopted the plan for the demerger of Hydro and the
merger of Hydros demerged petroleum activities with Statoil. Correspondingly, the Board of Directors of Statoil adopted
the Merger Plan on 13 March 2007. This Merger Plan contemplates the separation of Hydro Petroleum
from the remaining business of Hydro and its combination with Statoil. After the demerger Hydro
will consist of aluminium metal, aluminium products, power and other business activities.
The Merger, the Merger Plan, the Merged Company, Hydro Petroleum and risks related to Hydro Petroleum and the
Merger of Hydro Petroleum with Statoil are described in Statoils Prospectus.
Hydro after the Demerger
Following
the completion of the recommended Merger expected in September or
October 2007, Hydro
will go forward as a financially strong aluminium and power company pursuing business opportunities
on a global basis. We will be the worlds third largest listed aluminium company, focused on
growing profitably through targeted international business development, operational excellence,
leading technology and innovative solutions. We will be the fifth largest producer of primary metal
with production in Europe, Canada and Australia, and an extensive network of remelt facilities. We
will be a significant supplier to the building industry, especially in Europe, and of rolled
products to the packaging and graphics industries. We will also be a world-leading supplier of
precision drawn tubing.
Key financial items on a carve-out basis1) include operating revenues amounting to NOK
103 billion and NOK 92 billion for 2006 and 2005 respectively. Corresponding operating income
amounts to NOK 7.8 billion and NOK 4.4 billion respectively. Total assets amount to NOK 108 billion
for 2006 and NOK 101 billion for 2005.
For a more complete description of our business after the demerger and more comprehensive financial
information, you should read the section Hydro after the Demerger in its entirety.
|
|
|
1) |
|
The demerger carve-out financial information has been derived from Hydros
consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 2005. Hydro After
Demerger financial information is the remaining assets, liabilities, equity and results after
carving-out the Hydro Petroleum figures. |
Hydro Information Memorandum
6
4 Description of Hydro prior to the Demerger
Hydro is a Fortune 500 energy and aluminium company with 33,000 employees in nearly 40
countries. We are a leading offshore producer of oil and gas, a major aluminium supplier and a
leader in the development of renewable energy sources. Our mission is to strengthen the viability
of the customers and communities we serve.
Hydros mission is to create a more viable society by developing natural resources and products in
innovative and efficient ways.
The way we work is characterized by our institutional talents:
|
|
|
An ability to develop source businesses |
|
|
|
|
A drive to optimize |
|
|
|
|
An instinct to commercialize |
|
|
|
|
A passion for social commerce |
Our mission, institutional talents and values courage, respect, cooperation, determination and
foresight together create a platform, The Hydro Way, which has contributed to value creation for
more than 100 years and will influence us in the future. We are continuously developing our
corporate culture, work practices and commercial outlook with a view to long-term value creation.
We are an international energy company and a major player in the Nordic and European energy market.
We develop, produce and supply oil, gas and hydropower, take an active role in developing new
energy forms like wind power and hydrogen, and manage extensive energy trading and transport
operations. Hydro is a leading global aluminium supplier with primary metal production in Europe,
Canada and Australia and an extensive network of remelt facilities. We are a significant supplier
to the building industry, especially in Europe, and of rolled products to the packaging and
graphics industries. We are a world leading supplier of aluminium bumper beams, engine blocks and
precision drawn tubing. Through Hydro Polymers we are a leading northern European producer of the
plastics raw material polyvinyl chloride (PVC).
In recent years, our business areas have grown as a result of substantial investments,
including several acquisitions. In 1999, we acquired Saga Petroleum ASA, a Norwegian-based oil
company, merging Sagas operations into our oil and energy business area. In 2002, we acquired
interests in eight oil and gas licenses on the NCS from the Norwegian State. This acquisition
increased our interests in the Oseberg, Tune and Grane fields, where we are the operator. We paid
NOK 3.45 billion (USD 415 million) for the license interests which expire between 2015 and 2032. In
2005, we acquired all of the shares of Spinnaker Exploration Company in an all-cash transaction for
USD 2.45 billion (NOK 16.5 billion). In March 2002, we acquired all the outstanding shares of VAW
Aluminium AG for a total purchase price, including indirect acquisition costs, of EUR 1,911 million
(NOK 14.8 billion; USD 1.7 billion). Earlier in that same year, we acquired the French building
systems supplier, Technal. A significant portion of the expansion of these two core business areas
has been financed through the sale of non-core businesses. In March of 2004, we completed the
demerger of our Agri business transferring all assets, rights, liabilities and obligations
primarily relating to the Agri business to Yara International ASA.
7
Hydro Information Memorandum
5 The demerger of Hydro and the merger of Hydro Petroleum with Statoil
On 12 March 2007 the Board of Directors of Hydro adopted the plan for the demerger of Hydro
and the merger of Hydros demerged petroleum activities with Statoil. Correspondingly, the Board of Directors of Statoil
adopted the Merger Plan on 13 March 2007. This Merger Plan contemplates the separation of Hydro
Petroleum from the remaining business of Hydro, and its combination with Statoil. After the
demerger Hydro will consist of aluminium metal, aluminium products, power and other business
activities.
This Information Memorandum has been prepared to provide a description of Hydro after the demerger
of Hydro in accordance with the Merger Plan.
As mentioned in the Important Notice of this Information Memorandum, Statoil has prepared a circular/prospectus that
is referred to in this Information Memorandum as Statoils Prospectus. A description of Hydro Petroleum is provided in
the sections HYDRO PETROLEUM and HYDRO PETROLEUM MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS of Statoils Prospectus. The carve-out combined financial
statements of Hydro Petroleum are provided and described in the section HYDRO PETROLEUM CARVE-OUT
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Risk factors related to the business of Hydro Petroleum are included in the
section RISK FACTORS, Risks Related to the Business of Hydro Petroleum. A description of material aspects of the
Merger Plan, the Merger and the Merged Company is provided in the sections THE MERGER PLAN, THE MERGER
and THE MERGED COMPANY. Risk factors related to or resulting from the Merger are included in the section RISK
FACTORS, Risks Related to the Transaction.
Hydro Information Memorandum
8
6 Hydro after the Demerger
Following the completion of the recommended Merger expected in the third quarter of 2007, Hydro
will go forward as a financially strong aluminium and power company pursuing business opportunities
on a global basis. We will be the worlds third largest listed aluminium company, focused on
growing profitably through targeted international business development, operational excellence,
leading technology and innovative solutions.
6.1 Introduction, summary business information, strategy
6.1.1 Introduction
Our business will consist of aluminium metal, aluminium products, power and other business
activities.
In January 2006, we reorganized our upstream and downstream aluminium operations into two separate
business areas: Aluminium Metal and Aluminium Products.
Hydros Aluminium Metal business consists of Hydros upstream activities, principally the
production and sale of primary aluminium and casthouse products such as sheet ingot, extrusion
ingot and foundry alloys. Our metal activities also include the remelting and processing of scrap
and ingot, as well as long-term commercial contracts and all aluminium and raw materials trading
activities.
Hydros Aluminium Products business consists of the sub-segments rolled products, extrusion and
automotive.
|
|
|
Rolled products consists of our rolling mills located primarily in Europe.
Rolled products also includes our 50 percent interest in the AluNorf hot rolling mill
located in Germany. |
|
|
|
|
Extrusion consists of our extruded products business focused mainly on the
building, construction and transportation industry sectors. Our building systems activities
are included in this sub-segment. |
|
|
|
|
Automotive consists of our precision tubing, structures and casting operations
primarily serving the automotive industry. The automotive sub-segment also includes our
magnesium operations. |
Our power operations consist of the operation of our hydroelectric power stations and our solar
power business activities.
Our other business activities consist of Polymers, our internal service provider, Production
Partner, and Industriforsikring, our captive insurance company.
6.1.2 Summary business information
6.1.2.1 Aluminium Metal
Hydro is the worlds fifth largest primary aluminium producer. We are a major worldwide
supplier of value-added casthouse products, including extrusion ingots, sheet ingots and foundry
alloys. Our 2006 operating revenues were approximately NOK 68 billion, generated by around 5,300
employees in 20 countries.
We produced approximately 1.8 million metric tons (mt) of primary metal in 2006 at plants located
in Australia, Canada, Germany, Norway and Slovakia. In total, 3.5 million mt were delivered to the
market, including 1.4 million mt of remelted and recycled metal. We believe our competitive
position is improving as we continue to reposition our primary metal capacity toward modern,
cost-efficient production facilities. In 2007, we expect to make a final decision for Qatalum, a
major new primary metal facility in Qatar. Our 50 percent ownership share in Qatalum is expected to
add additional capacity of approximately 290,000 mt a year of highly competitive liquid metal by
the end of 2010. We are targeting approximately 1.7 million mt of primary metal production in 2007
and 2.0 million mt in 2009 (amounts are net of closed, uncompetitive primary metal capacity).
Aluminium is processed to meet customers needs in casthouses. Many of these casthouses are
integrated with our primary aluminium plants, and some are located in specialized remelt and/or
recycling facilities close to our customers in Europe and the US that provide tailor-made
deliveries. In 2006, remelted and recycled metal accounted for about 40 percent of the metal that
we delivered to the market. Our casthouse product position in Asia has been strengthened by
investments in our primary metal plant in Australia.
9
Hydro Information Memorandum
Alumina, power and labor are the three most important smelter cost elements for the industry.
We have ownership interests in alumina refineries providing approximately 55 percent of our alumina
needs (Alunorte in Brazil and Alpart in Jamaica). The most important of these interests, Alunorte,
is the worlds largest alumina refinery and, we believe, one of the most cost-efficient. Our
remaining alumina supply requirements are covered through medium to long-term contracts. Long-term
power contracts in Norway provide roughly 90 percent of the energy needs of our Norwegian smelters
after the closure of the Karmøy Søderberg line in 2009. We have entered into power contracts
covering 100 percent of our energy needs for production at Neuss in the period 2006 2008.
6.1.2.2 Aluminium Products
Hydro is an industry leader for a range of downstream aluminium products and markets, in
particular the transportation, building, packaging and lithographic market sectors. Our ambition is
to be a high quality and value-adding supplier of aluminium products and solutions, with strong
positions in markets that provide opportunities for good financial returns. We are currently
working to improve the financial performance and cash generation of our downstream operations.
In 2006, we generated revenues of approximately NOK 50 billion from the sale of aluminium products,
employing around 19,000 employees in 28 countries. Our operations are primarily located in Europe,
where we generated approximately 75 percent of our total operating revenues in 2006. About 16
percent of our total operating revenues were generated from North America in 2006.
Our extrusion operations consist mainly of general soft alloy extruded products and building
systems for facades, wall partitions, doors and windows. About 70 percent of our total extrusion
revenues in 2006 came from our general extrusion businesses and 30 percent came from building
systems. We have wholly-owned extrusion, extrusion-related fabrication and building systems
operations located throughout Europe and the US, in addition to units in Brazil and Argentina,
smaller units in India, China and Russia, and partly-owned operations in South Africa and Bahrain.
Through our global network of extrusion plants we serve local customers with customized profiles
and building systems. In 2006, we produced 560 mt of extruded products from our network of
extrusion plants.
We are the second largest producer in the European rolling industry in terms of market share, and
hold leading positions within high value-added rolled products segments such as lithographic
(printing) plates and aseptic foil. In 2006, we shipped just above one million mt of rolled
products from our six European plants and our Malaysian plant. More than half of this production
was produced in Grevenbroich, Germany, which is also the center of our rolled products foil and
lithographic sheet operations.
Our automotive business comprises precision tubing, automotive components (structures and
casting) and our primary and remelt magnesium production. In 2006, we announced further measures to
divest or close under-performing units, and we signed a contract to divest our automotive casting
operations that was completed in March of 2007. We are also evaluating alternative opportunities
relating to the divestment of our automotive structures business. During 2006, we also decided to
exit the magnesium business and announced the closure of our primary magnesium plant in Becancour,
Canada and the plan to divest our remaining magnesium remelters in China and Germany. We also plan
to evaluate the divestment of a number of smaller extrusion-based units.
6.1.2.3 Power
Hydro is one of the largest producers of power in Norway. The main hydroelectric power plants
are located in Telemark, Røldal/Suldal and Sogn, with a normal annual production of approximately
9.0 TWh. Our Nordic electricity portfolio includes owned generation facilities, long-term supply
contracts and internal and external sales contracts.
6.1.2.4 Other
Hydro Polymers is involved in all stages of production of the plastic raw material polyvinyl
chloride (PVC), and its intermediate products, ethylene, chlorine and vinyl chloride monomer (VCM).
We are the largest PVC supplier in the Nordic countries, with a market share of approximately 65
percent.
Industriforsikring, a captive insurance company, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hydro.
Industriforsikring provides property damage, business interruption, cargo and third party liability
insurance coverage for subsidiary companies of the Hydro Group.
Hydro Information Memorandum
10
Hydro Production Partner is extensively involved in production and maintenance support within Hydro
and also with external customers.
6.1.3 Strategy
6.1.3.1 Aluminium Metal
Our strategy is to maximize value creation by building a highly competitive portfolio of
aluminium assets and being a leader in the aluminium industry. In order to improve and secure
sufficient returns on capital employed, we intend to continue our focus on repositioning our
upstream operations towards low-cost primary metal capacity and to actively pursue growth
opportunities within competitive alumina and primary metal production.
Reposition primary metal capacity
We plan to grow our position in primary metal by making new investments in our upstream operations.
We intend to continue to reposition our primary metal production by completing the closure of
unprofitable capacity and replacing it with competitive new capacity in areas where energy is
available at attractive prices. Our aim is to increase the share of our production that is produced
in larger and more efficient smelters. We have increased our share of production at smelters having
a minimum capacity of 300,000 mt per year from none in 2000 to approximately 30 percent in 2006 and
plan to reach 45 percent in 2010. The expansions of our Sunndal plant in Norway and part-owned
Alouette plant in Canada have contributed to an improved relative cost position. Qatalum, the
planned smelter project in Qatar, is expected to add substantial cost efficient production capacity
following start-up of the plant, which is expected in the last quarter of 2009. The German metal
plants in Hamburg and Stade were closed down at the end of 2005 and 2006, respectively. The
Søderberg line in Høyanger in Norway was shut down in February 2006, while the Søderberg line in
Årdal, also in Norway, is expected to be closed by the summer of 2007.
Increase low cost equity alumina coverage
We continuously focus on reducing the cost of our alumina supply. We meet our alumina needs
based on a combination of equity investments in production facilities having competitive, low cost
positions and a portfolio of medium- to long-term contracts. In 2006, approximately 55 percent of
our alumina needs were covered by equity production. The ongoing expansion of the Alunorte alumina
refinery in Brazil (Hydro share 34 percent) has been a key component in our strategy. The third
planned expansion at Alunorte is expected to reduce our average alumina costs and increase the
amount of annual alumina requirements provided from our equity alumina production to approximately
70 75 percent by 2010, when Qatalum is expected to be in full production.
Focus on growth
During the first half of 2006, our aluminium metal business was reorganized to focus on our
key strategic goals for this business area: repositioning and growth. Our operational organization
has been strengthened, and we have allocated considerable new resources toward identifying and
evaluating new growth opportunities. Several new business development opportunities have been
identified in order to explore the possibility for new projects within bauxite/alumina and
smelting. New proprietary smelting technology is under development to support our growth ambitions,
enhance our cost competitiveness and further strengthen our environmental standards.
Operational excellence, incremental production growth
Operational excellence is a top priority, and we intend to continue our focus on the
optimization of our existing plant portfolio. Increased output based on better utilization of
installed capacity and cost improvement initiatives are key priorities. Our TRI rate2)
for 2006 was 6.2 in 2006 compared with 15 in 2002, and we are targeting a 20 percent reduction in
2007.
|
|
|
2) |
|
TRI rate is defined as total recordable injuries per million hours worked. |
11
Hydro Information Memorandum
6.1.3.2 Aluminium Products
Hydros European extrusion and global building systems operations delivered a strong
performance in 2006. However, we announced a restructuring of other downstream operations last year
in order to improve the overall operating results for our aluminium products business area. We
intend to continually improve the operational performance of profitable businesses and to turn
around, divest or close under-performing units. Our focus for our aluminium products business is on
cash generation.
Maintain high performance in extrusion and building system activities
We intend to focus on our extrusion-based activities within four defined business sectors:
Extrusion Europe, Extrusion Overseas, Building Systems and Precision Tubing. We intend to build a
sustainable performance level, and a platform for further business development, based on our
existing technological strength and strong market positions within these businesses. Particular
attention is being given to improving the performance of our North American extrusion and precision
tubing business activities. We are also working to enhance the performance and to further develop
our European extrusion operations and building system businesses.
Develop and improve position in rolled products
We view our position in the European rolled products industry as strong, and consider
ourselves a global leader in value-added products like lithographic plates and aseptic foil. We
also have a strong European position in heat transfer applications. We believe we have a highly
competent organization and the technical expertise to enable us to focus on continued growth in
selected markets and to improve our cost position. We also intend to play a role in the necessary
restructuring of the rolled products industry in Europe.
Restructuring our business portfolio
During 2006 we performed a comprehensive portfolio review that resulted in a defined
restructuring program that identified specific units for divestment or closure. A decision was
taken to divest our automotive castings business and we are evaluating alternative opportunities
relating to the divestment of our automotive structures business, possibly in combination with
closures of certain units. In addition, under-performing units within the non-automotive sectors
are being evaluated for possible divestment or closure. A decision was also taken to exit the
magnesium business. We expect to complete the announced restructurings by the end of 2007.
Plant rationalization and performance improvement
Rationalization programs are being initiated for under-performing units that will remain in
the portfolio, with the aim to lift their performance to a viable level. Rationalization programs
were initiated in several operating units in 2006, including our extrusion activities in the UK and
our precision tubing activities in North America, and we intend to continue the program in 2007. In
addition, we have defined and initiated comprehensive improvement programs for all of our business
sectors, with the focus on reducing cost and enhancing revenues and margins.
Focus on cash generation
Our strategy is to prioritize cash generation over growth opportunities in the short-term. We
intend to keep capital expenditures at a moderate level, to be comprised mainly of investments
designed to ensure stable operations and good safety standards and to maintain the value of our
remaining assets. We will also focus on maintaining a lean level of operating capital.
6.1.3.3 Power
Optimizing our power activities
Since the liberalization of the Norwegian electricity market in 1991, we have developed our
commercial power activities, along with analysis, portfolio and risk management systems. We will
continue to focus on optimizing our Nordic electricity portfolio and sourcing of power to our
larger consuming plants in the Nordic area and continental Europe. Operating our hydroelectric
power plants in Norway as efficiently as possible remains a key priority.
Hydro Information Memorandum
12
6.1.3.4 Other
In December 2006, we announced that we are considering a possible divestment or public listing
of our Polymer business. We believe it is an appropriate time to create new opportunities for
Polymers by re-exploring options for new ownership.
6.2 Business overview
6.2.1 Aluminium Metal
6.2.1.1 Industry overview
Aluminium smelting is a capital intensive, technology driven industry concentrated with
relatively few dominant companies. In recent years, China has emerged as a main driver of market
fundamentals. Russia is also growing in importance in terms of industry developments. There are two
raw material sources for new aluminium products: primary aluminium made from electrolysis of
alumina, as well as remelting and recycling of aluminium scrap. Scrap is generated throughout the
value chain when producing finished aluminium products and collected in the market place after the
use of the products is over. The recycling process requires approximately 5 percent of the energy
needed in the electrolytic primary production process, and the properties of the metal are the
same. About one third of new aluminium products are made from collected scrap according to the
International Aluminium Institute (IAI).
Structural developments
Three major global integrated companies have emerged from the substantial concentration of upstream
aluminium activities in the past 10 years: Alcoa, Alcan and Hydro. Industry analysts expect that
the consolidation activity within the aluminium industry will continue. In addition to the three
integrated companies, there are several large companies that focus mainly on upstream operations
bauxite, alumina and/or primary metal such as BHP Billiton, based in Australia and the United
Kingdom, Rio Tinto Aluminium, based in Australia, and CVRD, based in Brazil. The Russian aluminium
industry is being consolidated into one major company as a result of the announced merger of two
Russian companies, Rusal and Sual, and the Swiss natural resource group Glencore, which will
contribute part of its aluminium business. The new company, United Company Rusal, will control
Russias entire annual aluminium output approaching 4 million mt, but will have only minor
downstream operations. Since the 1990s, China has emerged as a major consumer as well as producer
of primary metal. The industry structure in China is still rather fragmented with many small- and
medium-sized companies, although the number of players has been reduced more than 40 percent during
the last four years. Chalco has evolved as the most significant operator in China, with a 2006
production of about 1,800 million mt. Alcoa has an 8 percent ownership interest in Chalco. Many
smaller companies have merged with or been taken over by Chalco.
Growth in aluminium consumption
Aluminium consumption has enjoyed good average growth over the last few decades, partly due to
general economic growth and partly due to its substitution for other materials. Total aluminium
consumption, primary and recycled based, has been growing at a somewhat higher rate than the
development in overall industrial production, while primary aluminium consumption shows a growth
rate corresponding to or slightly higher than industrial production. During 2006, the global
primary aluminium consumption growth rate was around 7 percent, greatly influenced by a very strong rise in Chinese consumption. Primary aluminium
consumption in the western world increased by an estimated 4.5 percent in 2006, compared with 2.5
percent in 2005. Western world production increased by about 2 percent during 2006, compared with
2005. Globally, the increase was about 6 percent, also led by China. Both production and
consumption in China continued to increase at a rapid pace, up about 18 percent in 2006 compared
with 2005. In 2006 China accounted for about 25 percent of global primary aluminium consumption,
contributing about 4 percentage points, or about 55 percent, to the total increase in world
consumption. Chinas share of global primary aluminium production in 2006 was about 27 percent. Net
exports of primary aluminium amounted to approximately 700,000 mt in 2006. Adjusting for net
imports of scrap metal, and including net exports of rolled and extruded products, as well as other
fabricated products, China was for the first time a net exporter of aluminium, estimated at about
500,000 mt for the year. Chinese production of semi-fabricated aluminium is increasing rapidly, up
an estimated 37 percent from 2005 to 2006. This has led to a significant rise in net exports of
semi-fabricated products, reaching about 500,000 mt in 2006.
It is uncertain if China
will remain a net exporter of primary aluminium in the long-term, but
China is expected to concentrate on labor intensive production of semi-finished and fabricated
products for export. This would be in line with announced Chinese policy, as demonstrated by the
increased export tax for primary aluminium from 5 percent to 15
13
Hydro Information Memorandum
percent. Further, it seems likely
that China will depend on increasing imports of scrap and off-grade metal to meet domestic needs
and as a basis for export of semi-fabricated and finished products. It is possible that domestic
aluminium production, together with scrap imports, will not be sufficient to meet the growth in
Chinese demand over time, resulting in the need to import primary metal.
Aluminium price developments
Primary aluminium in its basic ingot form is traded on various metal exchanges, primarily the
London Metal Exchange (LME). In the long run, prices generally reflect market fundamentals of the
physical market as well as underlying cost developments. However, financial investors high trading
volumes in the derivative markets can have a strong influence on price developments in the short
and medium term, occasionally in contradiction with developments in the physical market. Price
volatility may therefore be high.
During the last three years, there has been an upward shift in the cost curve for primary aluminium
production, triggered mainly by a significant increase in energy prices in historically important
producing areas for aluminium. The increase in energy prices is also influencing the cost of, and
consequently the price for, alumina, as well as other important cost elements. Even though the
estimated long-term aluminium price expectation has been increased, announcements of temporary and
permanent closure of aluminium production plants have been made in Europe and the United States,
the regions most severely affected by the cost increases. In general terms, aluminium production
plants in these regions may be subject to closure if they are unable to renew or replace their
power contracts at sustainable terms. However, high aluminium prices, combined with low spot
alumina prices, have triggered the restart of certain idle capacity.
New capacity needed to replace closed capacity and to meet increasing future demand is expected to
be largely developed in energy rich areas where at least some of the energy resources have limited
alternative value in the foreseeable future. Such countries and regions will include the Middle
East, Russia, Iceland and some countries in Africa, Asia and South America.
Developments in aluminium inventories
Reported primary metal inventories, defined as producer stocks reported by IAI, metal exchange
stocks and Japanese port stocks, decreased by about 250,000 mt during 2006, reflecting a healthy
physical market during the year.
6.2.1.2 Primary aluminium production
Production in a primary aluminium smelter
Hydros primary aluminium plants are comprised of a reduction plant containing potlines and a
casthouse where liquid and remelt aluminium is cast to form value-added products such as extrusion
ingots, primary foundry alloys, sheet ingot and standard ingots. In addition, several of our
operations include a carbon plant where anodes are formed and baked for delivery to the prebake
lines, while some of our plants source their anodes from other plants in our system or from our
partially-owned (36 percent) Aluchemie carbon plant in the Netherlands.
We produced primary aluminium at 11 wholly or partly-owned primary aluminium plants in 2006. Our
proprietary technology plays an important role in ensuring our competitive edge. We believe it
serves as an industry benchmark for environmental performance, and sets high standards for safety
and productivity. Many plants operated at record production during 2006. Production at the plants
during the three most recent years are reflected in the table below:
Hydro Information Memorandum
14
Primary aluminium production (tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smelter |
|
Country |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Karmøy |
|
Norway |
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
277,000 |
|
|
|
278,000 |
|
Årdal |
|
Norway |
|
|
232,000 |
|
|
|
233,000 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
|
Sunndal |
|
Norway |
|
|
357,000 |
|
|
|
362,000 |
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
Høyanger 1) |
|
Norway |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
76,000 |
|
Søral (49.9% share) |
|
Norway |
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
Slovalco |
|
Slovakia |
|
|
158,000 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
157,000 |
|
Neuss |
|
Germany |
|
|
226,000 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
223,000 |
|
Stade 2) |
|
Germany |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
HAW (33.3% share) 3) |
|
Germany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
Kurri Kurri |
|
Australia |
|
|
164,000 |
|
|
|
152,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Tomago (12.4% share) |
|
Australia |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
60,0000 |
|
Alouette (20% share) |
|
Canada |
|
|
114,000 |
|
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
1,799,00 |
|
|
|
1,826,000 |
|
|
|
1,720,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Shutdown of Høyanger Søderberg production line completed end of February 2006 |
|
2) |
|
Shutdown of Stade production completed end of 2006 |
|
3) |
|
Shutdown of HAW production completed end of 2005 |
Stricter emission standards established by the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority (SFT) in
accordance with the Oslo and Paris Convention (OSPAR) relating to the use of Søderberg technology
are effective at the beginning of 2007. Søderberg technology is based on open cells that produce
higher emissions and yield lower productivity than modern prebake cells. We have decided not to
upgrade our primary aluminium production facilities that use Søderberg technology in Høyanger,
Årdal and Karmøy. We have further decided that investments to replace this capacity will not be
made in Høyanger and Årdal, where the resulting closures will reduce our annual primary aluminium
production capacity by approximately 70,000 mt in total over the years 2005-2007. The Søderberg
line in Høyanger was closed down in February 2006, while the line in Årdal is expected to be closed
down by summer 2007.
We were not able to renew or replace the electricity contracts related to our German activities at
sustainable terms and conditions after 2005. As a result, we decided to close the plant in Stade
and, together with our co-owners, we decided to close the HAW smelter in Hamburg. HAW production
was shut down at the end of 2005 and Stade was phased out by the end of 2006, together reducing
production by 110,000 mt. These closures, combined with the shutdown of the Søderberg production
lines discussed above, will reduce uncompetitive production by a total of 180,000 mt by the end of
2007. Such production has been largely replaced by new, cost-efficient production from the
expansion of our Sunndal plant in
Norway and the part-owned Alouette plant in Canada.
We have a strong commitment to safety and systematically review and follow several key performance
indicators. One of these, the TRI rate (total recordable injuries per million hours worked) for
2006, declined to 6.2 in 2006 compared with 15 in 2002, and we are targeting a further 20 percent
reduction in 2007.
15
Hydro Information Memorandum
Primary Aluminium Smelters (fully consolidated)
We acquired a substantial number of our primary aluminium plants through two major acquisitions:
the acquisition of the Norwegian state-owned aluminium company, Årdal og Sunndal Verk (ÅSV) in 1986
and the acquisition of VAW Aluminium AG in 2002. The Årdal, Sunndal and Høyanger plants were
acquired as result of the ÅSV acquisition. The Neuss, Stade and Kurri Kurri plants as well as the
interest in the Alouette and Tomago plants were acquired as result of the VAW acquisition.
Karmøy, Norway: Aluminium production in Karmøy started in 1967, and the plant had about 650
employees at the end of 2006. Production lines at the plant consist of two prebake and one
Søderberg line. The casthouse at Karmøy delivered 287,000 mt of extrusion ingot and 72,000 mt of
wire rod in 2006. The industrial site also contains a carbon paste plant, a R&D center, a rolling
mill, extrusion plant and other downstream activities.
SFT has postponed implementation of the new emission restrictions at the Karmøy plant so that they
will now become effective in November 2007. Collective emissions from the plant at Karmøy are
comparable with the best modern aluminium production facilities in the EU and, taken as a whole,
fall within the new SFT limits, thereby supporting the continued operation of the Søderberg
facility at Karmøy until the planned shutdown of the Søderberg line at the end of 2009.
In February 2007, an application from the Karmøy plant to continue production on the line until the
end of 2009 was declined by SFT. We have appealed this decision to the Norwegian Ministry of the
Environment. See Regulation and taxation Aluminium regulation Integrated pollution prevention
and control later in this section for further information on environmental regulation.
Årdal, Norway: Årdal has been producing aluminium since 1948, and the plant had about 600 employees
at the end of 2006. Årdal produces primary aluminium on two prebake and one Søderberg line. The two
casthouses delivered 194,000 mt of sheet ingot and 120,000 mt of foundry alloys in 2006. Permission
to operate the Søderberg line at Årdal has been extended to 1 October 2007. The Søderberg line,
which today produces 50,000 mt primary aluminium, will be shut down within this time frame. As part
of the restructuring at the metal plant, we have contributed to the development of several new
business activities in order to create new employment opportunities in Årdal. In addition, we
decided in June 2006 to invest an additional NOK 200 million in our research center in Årdal.
Sunndal, Norway: Aluminium production in Sunndal started in 1954. In 2004, we completed an
expansion of our Sunndal plant which is now the largest and, we believe, most modern aluminium
plant in Europe. Sunndal produces primary aluminium from two prebake lines and had about 700
employees at the end of 2006. The casthouse at Sunndal delivered 352,000 mt of extrusion ingot and
77,000 mt of foundry alloys in 2006.
Høyanger, Norway: Høyanger started production in 1918 as the first aluminium smelter established
in Norway and had about 140 employees at the end of 2006. The plant produces primary aluminium from
one prebake line. The casthouse at Høyanger delivered 81,000 mt of sheet ingot in 2006. The
Søderberg production line was closed in February 2006.
Neuss, Germany: Neuss, which is Germany`s largest electrolysis plant, started production in 1961,
and had about 650 employees at the end of 2006. Neuss produces primary aluminium from three prebake
lines. The casthouse at Neuss delivered 329,000 mt of rolled products ingot to the Alunorf rolling
mill in 2006, which in turn delivers aluminium coil to Aluminium Products foil mill at
Grevenbroich. We also remelt 22,000 mt of foil scrap annually from the Grevenbroich rolling mill.
This provides an important environmental benefit and improves our competitive position since
remelting consumes substantially less
energy than production of virgin metal. We have entered into power contracts covering our energy
needs for production at Neuss for the period 2007 2008.
Stade, Germany: After more than 33 years of continuous production, the metal plant in Stade was
shut down in December 2006 due to high power prices. Being the smallest German primary aluminium
production facility, with an outdated and labor intensive technology, continuing production at the
plant was not viable. The shutdown proceeded according to plan. As of 1 January 2007, Prokon Nord
Energie Systeme GmbH has taken over the facilities at the site, including the commitment to offer
at least 90 employment positions to Hydro employees in Stade. Over time, Prokon will refurbish and
operate several facilities located at the site.
Hydro Information Memorandum
16
Kurri Kurri, Australia: Aluminium production in Kurri Kurri commenced in 1969, and the plant had
about 500 employees at the end of 2006. Kurri Kurri produces primary aluminium from three prebake
lines and completed an upgrade in all operational areas during 2006, including a new carbon baking
furnace, modernization of one potline and construction of a new casting facility to produce foundry
alloy ingots. Production and safety performance for 2006 set new benchmark standards for the site.
Kurri Kurri had the lowest recordable injury rate among our wholly-owned smelters for 2006.
Reductions in PFC (perfluorocarbon) emissions from the plant in 2006 were significant and it is
anticipated that the reductions will translate to a noticeable improvement in the Australian
national PFC emission level. The upgrade of the casthouse to meet the strong growth in demand for
value-added products in the Asia Pacific market was successfully completed during the third quarter
of 2006. The investment enables the plant to supply up to 88,000 tonnes of foundry alloys and
110,000 mt of extrusion ingots per year.
Slovalco, Slovakia (55.3 percent share): Slovalco had about 600 employees at the end of 2006 and
produces primary aluminium on one prebake line. The plant is geographically well positioned in the
middle of the European market. Hydro acquired a majority position in the Slovakian aluminium
company in August 2006. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) owns 10
percent, while the Slovakian company ZSNP holds the remaining 34.7 percent. Slovalco has been fully
consolidated in terms of financial results and volumes since 2004.
Primary Aluminium Smelters (non-consolidated)
Søral, Norway (49.9 percent share): The plant had about 400 employees at the end of 2006 and
produces primary aluminium on one prebake line.
Tomago, Australia (12.4 percent share): The plant had about 1000 employees at the end of 2006 and
produces primary aluminium on three prebake lines. Tomago ranks among the worlds lowest operating
cost smelters.
Alouette, Canada (20 percent share): The plant had about 900 employees at the end of 2006, and
produces primary aluminium on two prebake lines. In 2002, Hydro decided to participate in the
expansion of the plant, making Alouette the largest aluminium plant in North America and among the
worlds lowest operating cost primary aluminium plants. The expansion project was completed during
2005 and the increased production is fully reflected in the volumes for 2006.
6.2.1.3 Raw materials
Approximately two metric tons of alumina are required to produce one metric ton of aluminium.
Over the last decade, we have mainly based our supply of alumina on a combination of equity
investments in production facilities having competitive, low-cost positions and a portfolio of
medium to long-term contracts. In 2006, approximately 55 percent of our alumina requirements for
primary metal production was provided by such
equity investments. Our average cash cost of equity alumina production increased from USD 167 per
mt in 2005 to approximately USD 195 per mt in 2006 due to high energy prices, currency effects and
high bauxite prices resulting from the increased LME prices. See Financial review Overview,
operating income, outlook Aluminium Metal later in this information memorandum for a discussion
on the developments in spot prices for alumina.
Hydros major alumina investment is its 34 percent participation in Alunorte, a Brazilian alumina
refiner. After an initial expansion of the plant in 2003, annual capacity reached approximately 2.4
million mt, enabling Hydro to secure access to 810,000 mt of alumina per year. During 2006, the
second expansion of the Alunorte refinery was completed and increased annual capacity to
approximately 4.4 million mt. A third expansion started in 2006 and is targeting an increased total
annual production capacity of approximately 6.5 million mt by 2009. We also have a 35 percent
equity interest in the Alpart alumina refinery in Jamaica, which has an annual production capacity
of approximately 1.65 million mt. In 2010, when the Qatar smelter is expected to be on stream,
approximately 70 75 percent of our annual alumina requirements is expected to be provided from
our equity alumina production. We purchase alumina from Alunorte based on market prices for similar
duration contracts. The financial effects of our equity ownership in Alunorte are reflected in
earnings from non-consolidated investees.
17
Hydro Information Memorandum
In June 2003, Hydro and Comalco, now Rio Tinto, signed one of the largest alumina supply contracts
in the history of the aluminium industry. Under the agreement, Rio Tinto will supply Hydro with
500,000 mt of alumina annually from 2006 through 2030.
In addition to the equity interests in alumina production capacity mentioned above and the
long-term Rio Tinto contract, we have a number of short-, medium- and long-term purchase contracts
to secure alumina for our own smelters. These contracts typically have pricing formulas based upon
a percentage of the LME price.
Energy represents on average about 25 to 30 percent of the operating costs associated with primary
aluminium production. We have access to self-generated power and have negotiated long-term
contracts of 10 to 15 years for a vast majority of our production worldwide with the exception of
the German metal plant. German energy prices have increased dramatically over the last years, which
is also reflected in the forward market prices. The energy cost for aluminium production in Germany
now exceeds the industry average by a factor of 2 to 3.
Nearly all of the electricity needed to operate the Norwegian smelters in 2006 was covered by
internal and external contracts. Certain long-term supply contracts with the Norwegian electricity
company, Statkraft, expired in the summer of 2006. We have entered into new contacts with Statkraft
replacing those contracts through the year 2020. Compared with the expired contracts, the pricing
structure of the new contracts has increased energy costs in the second half of 2006. Internal
contracts cover about 50 percent of the energy consumption of the fully-owned Norwegian smelters.
The pricing structure of internal contracts was changed from 1 January 2006, also increasing energy
costs for our aluminium operations. Long-term availability of electricity at predictable prices is
considered a prerequisite for the further development of the Norwegian operations, particularly
since Nordic spot market prices can be highly volatile.
Anodes used and consumed in the smelting process account for approximately 15-20 percent of the
total production cost of primary aluminium. Most of Hydros smelters produce anodes at their own
on-site facilities. During the last several years we have expanded our capacity of anode production
both in our Årdal plant and in our part-owned company Aluchemie in the Netherlands. In addition, we
have upgraded the anode facility at our Kurri Kurri plant in Australia.
6.2.1.4 Casthouse products and remelt activities
To optimize our casthouse capacity for the production of midstream aluminium products, we
supplement the metal produced by our own smelters with remelt metal. We have established remelt and
refining plants for conversion of scrap metal and standard ingot into extrusion ingot and sheet
ingot in all major European markets, as well as in the United States. In Europe, facilities are
located in Norway, Luxembourg, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Italy and France, as well as at
the primary metal plants in Norway, Germany and Slovakia. In addition to remelting scrap returned
from customers and purchased from third parties, aluminium standard ingot is procured globally
under a combination of short and long-term contracts, with the major sources in the CIS, South
America and Southern Africa. Our aluminium metal remelting activities in 2006 accounted for
approximately 1.4 million mt.
We have entered into several long-term commercial agreements. These include our technology and
remarketing agreement with Rusal, currently providing 130,000 mt per year of extrusion ingot from
the Sayanogorsk smelter located in Siberia and an agreement with Talum in Slovenia for 105,000 mt
of foundry alloy and extrusion ingot through 2010.
Remelt activity and third-party sourcing represents about half of our external sales of metal each
year.
6.2.1.5 Sales, distribution and trading activities
Most of our aluminium is sold in the form of value-added products such as extrusion ingot,
sheet ingot, wire rod and foundry alloys to semi-fabricating plants such as extruders, rollers,
wire and cable mills, as well as foundries in Western Europe and in the United States. The main
consumer segments are transportation, building/construction and packaging. The major consuming
countries in Western Europe are Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Italy and Spain. We have
consistently strengthened our commitment to customer service and increased the efficiency of our
production systems. Our regional market teams have competencies within technical and commercial
service, research and development, logistics, contract administration and scrap conversion.
Trading is an extension of our internal sourcing activity of raw materials. The trading activities
contribute to optimizing capacity utilization within our own system as well as reducing logistical
costs by sourcing from a variety of sources. Our trading activities consist of physical metal
purchases and sales, as well as trading on the LME. The main trading product
Hydro Information Memorandum
18
is aluminium standard
ingot, which is the global aluminium product on which price quotations on the LME and other metal
exchanges are based. We also enter into purchase and sales contracts on alumina to optimize our
physical alumina portfolio on a short- and medium-term basis. Alumina is often used in combination
with metal trading and sourcing activities, for example, by supplying a third-party smelter with
alumina and receiving metal as compensation.
6.2.1.6 High purity aluminium
We produce and sell high purity aluminium products, which are mainly used in the electronics
industry in products like electrolytic capacitors, semiconductors and flat panel displays.
6.2.1.7 Projects
Qatalum
The Qatalum project, a 50 percent joint venture with Qatar Petroleum to construct a new primary
aluminium plant in Qatar, is progressing according to schedule. A final decision by
the partners to proceed with the project is expected to be taken in July 2007. Construction is
scheduled to begin in November 2007 and liquid metal production is expected to commence in the
fourth quarter of 2009. Qatalum will be the largest greenfield primary aluminium plant ever built,
and is an important element in our strategy to reposition our upstream aluminium operations.
Primary aluminium capacity is expected to be 585,000 mt annually (100 percent) when the plant is
fully operational, and future expansion potential could increase production by up to 1.2 million mt
per year. The total project includes the potrooms, anode production, two casthouses, a gas-fired
power plant and port facilities.
The estimated capital investment for the total Qatalum project is approximately USD 4.5 billion.
Operating costs are expected to be among the lowest in the industry, making Qatalum a highly
competitive smelter. A key strength is Qatalum`s dedicated electrical power generation plant that
will be supplied with gas from Qatar Petroleum under a long-term gas contract.
The Qatalum casthouses will have the capacity to deliver all metal produced as value-added
products, serving customers in Europe, Asia and North America.
Other project developments
In order to deliver on our strategy for repositioning and growth of our upstream aluminium metal
business, a number of projects and opportunities are being evaluated globally. A key priority in
2007 will be to further mature opportunities within the areas of bauxite, alumina and aluminium
smelting.
We have entered into memoranda of understanding (MoUs) for primary aluminium projects targeting
primary aluminium projects in Angola and Russia, and two MoUs have recently been signed in Asia -
one for a greenfield bauxite and alumina project and one for a greenfield primary aluminium
project. We have also entered into an agreement with the Greenland Home Rule to examine the
possibilities for a primary aluminium plant in Greenland.
6.2.2 Aluminium Products
6.2.2.1 Industry overview
Aluminium is a highly competitive business, challenged by substitution materials like steel,
plastics, composites, wood, glass and magnesium. In addition, there is strong competition among the
various aluminium producers with regard to product development, new solutions for customers and
continuous cost reductions. Aluminium is used in a variety of applications in several industries.
The major consumer segments are transportation, building/construction and packaging. Transportation
is expected to show the largest growth. The major consuming areas are North America, Western Europe
and China. We expect continued healthy longer-term growth in aluminium consumption in both Western
Europe and North America. However, China and other emerging markets are expected to be the main
drivers behind a significant growth in global aluminium consumption during the next decade. See
also Aluminium Metal Industry overview Growth in aluminium consumption in this section
regarding developments in China relating to production and export of semi-fabricated aluminium
products.
19
Hydro Information Memorandum
Industry structure
Over the last decade the downstream aluminium industry has evolved significantly, with
consolidations as well as selected spin-offs from large integrated aluminium companies. All three
major global integrated aluminium companies, Alcoa, Alcan and Hydro, have made or announced
significant restructuring of their downstream portfolios. In 2005, Alcan spun off a
major part of its rolled products business into the new company Novelis. Alcoa signed a letter of
intent with Orklas Sapa Group to create a joint venture that would combine its soft alloy
extrusion business with Sapas Profiles extruded aluminium business in late 2006, with the
intention of bringing forward an initial public offering of the combined entity. Hydro decided in
2006 to divest its automotive castings business and is evaluating alternative opportunities
relating to the divestment of its automotive structures business. In addition to the integrated
companies and a few major independent semi-fabricating producers, the structure in fabricated and
finished products is more fragmented. Industry analysts expect that the restructuring activity
within the downstream aluminium industry will continue, including a shift in capacity build-up
towards the emerging high-growth markets. In February 2007, Hindalco, Indias largest non-ferrous
metal company and Novelis entered into an agreement for Hindalco to acquire Novelis.
Developments within the flat rolled products industry
Today, there is an overcapacity in the Western European flat rolled products industry. Combined
with rising energy costs and high labor costs, this prevents a satisfactory margin for some product
segments. A similar situation exists within the North American industry. Due to more favorable
cost structures and more than a proportional share of the global growth in emerging markets, it is
expected that new capacity will originate from countries outside Western Europe and North America,
most notably in Asia. The expected annual growth in global demand for flat rolled products from
2005 to 2010 is 4.5 percent.
Developments within the extruded products industries
In Europe, the five largest producers of extruded products represent approximately 40 percent of
the market in terms of shipments. The remainder is very fragmented with about 220 mainly
independent producers representing roughly 55 percent. Only about 5 percent comes from imports. A
major share of the market is considered to be local, often based on a national level, although an
increasing amount of business is carried out on a pan-European basis. There is also a small
increase in low cost imports. Increasingly, new capacity is originating from Eastern Europe, and,
to a limited degree, is being replaced by low cost capacity outside Europe. Overall there is
overcapacity in most of the European markets. However, partly due to a relatively variable cost
structure, the current margins within the industry allow the most efficient producers to earn
returns at sustainable levels. A gradual further consolidation is expected within the European
industry, as well as a stronger drive among the existing producers towards developing value-added
business.
The North American extrusion industry is somewhat more consolidated than the European industry,
with the five largest producers representing about 60 percent of the market in terms of shipments
and 15 percent served by another 5 medium sized domestic
producers. Ten percent of the market is
based on imports, mainly from Asia and South America. The margins are under pressure both from
overcapacity as well as an increasing level of imports. As a result, a further restructuring is
expected within the North American extrusion industry.
The expected annual growth in global demand for extrusions from 2005 to 2010 is 4.9 percent.
6.2.2.2 Operational information
Aluminium Products sales volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes to external market (1,000 mt) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Aluminium extrusions* |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
Aluminium flat rolled products |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Magnesium |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes extrusion volumes in Extrusion, Precision Tubing and Structures |
Hydro Information Memorandum
20
6.2.2.3 Rolled Products
We are the second largest producer in the European rolling industry with an estimated 2006
market share of approximately 17 percent in Europe based on external shipments of about 1 million
mt of rolled products, of which 790 thousand mt is sold in Europe. We have key positions within
high value-added rolled products segments such as lithographic (printing) plates and liquid
packaging. Hydro has a 50 percent ownership interest in Aluminium Norf GmbH (AluNorf), which is the
worlds largest hot rolling mill. Most of our products from AluNorf are further processed in our
nearby plant in Grevenbroich before being delivered to customers. Grevenbroich is also the center
of our rolled products foil and lithographic sheet operations. The table below shows the ownership
interest and sales volume per main site in our rolled products production system in 2006.
Rolled Products production sites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
2006 sales |
|
|
|
percentage |
|
|
volume (1,000 mt) |
|
|
Norf/Grevenbroich, Germany |
|
|
50/100 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Hamburg, Germany |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Slim, Italy |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Inasa, Spain |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
AISB, Malaysia |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Karmøy, Norway |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Holmestrand, Norway |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Total, excluding internal sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our rolled products business, like the overall rolling industry, produces a wide variety of
products for different industries and with varying product margins. Important success factors
within the rolling industry are optimizing the product mix and capacity utilization, as well as
streamlining the production system. Because the rolling industry is capital intensive, high
capacity utilization (volume) is important to reach an acceptable fixed cost per mt. This must be
balanced with optimizing margins and product mix. Capacity utilization in the industry varies
between the products. In general, there is overcapacity within part of the strip business while we
have a high capacity utilization within our higher value foil and lithography businesses. We pursue
specialization of our plants in order to further improve efficiency, as well as upgrading and
de-bottlenecking of production lines and selling, general and administration cost reduction
efforts. In addition, we are holding capital investments at a moderate level and working on
reducing inventories as part of our overall focus on cash generation and lean operations.
Our customer base includes customers in the packaging, automotive, transport, building,
engineering, electrical and printing industries. A major part of our sales function is organized
centrally along product lines. Such organization enables optimization of sales, planning and
production in the total system.
Our rolled products business is
organized in three business units serving different market
segments, which in 2006 had the following sales volumes to external customers:
Rolled Products sales volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes to external market (1,000 mt) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Lithography |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Foil |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Strip |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
Total flat rolled products |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Hydro Information Memorandum
As a result of improved market conditions and improved productivity in our operations, as well as a
consistent focus on quality and service, we experienced a growth of 5 percent in total shipments in
2006, compared with 2005.
The lithography market is characterized by a high degree of concentration for both demand and
supply. Shipments in 2006 for our lithography business unit stabilized at last years level. We
believe that we are well positioned to continue to expand our customer base and meet expected
increased competition within this market sector. In 2006, shipments for our foil business were also
in line with 2005. Within key foil segments, such as liquid packaging, we hold leading global
positions.
Our strip business is characterized by higher volumes and lower margins compared to the other units
within our rolled products operation. For this business, high capacity utilization and production
efficiency are particularly important. The current strategy for this business is to optimize our
combined rolled products production and market system to realize the full potential of the overall
operation. Following improved market conditions, our shipments of strip products increased 8
percent in 2006 compared to 2005.
During 2006, we upgraded the hot rolling mill and installed a state-of-the-art cold rolling mill in
our plant in Italy as part of our performance improvement programs.
Most of the metal required for our production of rolled products is sourced internally. In
addition, process scrap from customers and scrap collected from the market are remelted together
with our own process scrap. Internal metal supplies are priced on an arms-length basis with
reference to the LME price. External supplies of rolling ingot were approximately 10 percent of
Hydros total need in 2006.
6.2.2.4 Extrusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extrusion sales volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes to external market (1,000 mt) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
General Extrusion Europe |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Building System |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Extrusion Americas |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Total extrusion |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our extrusion business mainly consists of general extrusion activities, organized in two separate
business sectors, one within Europe and one outside Europe, and our building systems activities
organized as a separate business sector.
General extrusion and value-added activities
Hydro supplies custom-made general extrusions of soft alloy aluminium to a broad range of market
segments. We have major operations throughout Europe and the US, as well as in
Brazil and Argentina, in addition to minor operations in Asia and Africa. We hold a leading
position in Europe and estimate our market share at 14 percent for 2006. In North America, we
believe we are the third largest operator with a market share of 7 percent in 2006. In South
America, we believe our plants in Brazil and Argentina are both solid footholds that will provide a
basis for future developments in the region.
We also operate a range of value-added activities such as surface treatment (e.g. anodizing, liquid
painting and powder coating) and fabrication activities, as well as components and finished
products businesses. These activities represent an increasingly important part of our
extrusion-related activities and are key elements in the further strategic and financial
development in our markets.
Hydro Information Memorandum
22
A key to the success of our extrusion business is our network of smaller, relatively independently
operated extrusion plants where decentralized organizations ensure good market alignment and close
contact with customers and where plants actively use internal benchmarking and apply best practices
to ensure continuous improvements in the flexibility and efficiency of operations. In 2006, our
total production of extruded products from all sectors including automotive was approximately
660,000 tons.
Building systems
Our building systems operations supply complete design and solution packages to metal builders,
enabling them to supply both the commercial and residential building markets with products such as
facades, partition walls, doors and windows, as well as other building applications through our
three main brands: Technal, Wicona and Domal. We also consider ourselves a leader within the
very fragmented building systems market in Europe.
We believe that our network of building systems brands and geographic locations represents an
important competitive strength in terms of sharing development, technology, product portfolios and
procurement. Our strategy is to combine these global attributes with local knowledge and presence
to enable us to deliver a good service to each of our individual customers.
6.2.2.5 Automotive
Hydros automotive business comprises our precision tubing and automotive components business
sectors, as well as our magnesium business unit. The automotive components sector includes our
structures and engine casting business units. The business sectors and business units include all
related worldwide operations and activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive sales volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 tonnes to market |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Precision Tubing |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Structures |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Magnesium |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our automotive structures unit supplies extrusion-based crash management applications such as
bumper beams and crash boxes. Our engine castings unit is one of a few independent that is, not
affiliated with an automotive manufacturer suppliers of aluminium cylinder heads and engine
blocks in Europe and North America. As part of our announced intention to restructure and improve
our downstream aluminium business operations, we decided during 2006 to exit the automotive
structures and casting businesses. Towards the end of 2006 we entered into agreements to divest our
automotive casting business unit and our 49 percent stake in Meridian Technologies Inc, the worlds
largest supplier of die-cast magnesium components to the automotive industry. The transactions were
finalized in early March 2007. We are also considering alternative opportunities to divest our
automotive structures business unit with the aim to complete that process by the end of 2007.
Our magnesium business consisted of our primary magnesium plant in Becancour, Canada and our remelt
operations in Norway, Germany and China. As part of our restructuring, we also decided to exit the
magnesium business. In 2006, we decided to close our primary magnesium plant in Becancour, Canada
and our magnesium remelt plant in Porsgrunn. The remelter in Porsgrunn was closed during the first
half of 2006 and the plant in Becancour will
close by the end of first quarter 2007. Divestment processes have been initiated on our remaining
magnesium remelt operations in Germany and China.
Our Precision Tubing business sector makes products used primarily within radiators, evaporators,
fuel coolers and liquid lines. We have a significant market presence in Europe, North and South
America as well as China, thus being the only player with operations in all major regions. We have
four European operations located in Denmark, Belgium, UK and Germany and three plants in the US:
one in Florida and two in Michigan. In addition, we have one operation in Brazil and, in August
2006, we commenced production in our new precision tubing plant in Reynosa in northern Mexico. We
also have a precision tubing plant in China that started production in May 2005. This business
sector, especially the North American part of our operations, is undergoing a significant
rationalization program to improve its operational and
23
Hydro Information Memorandum
financial performance, through cost
reduction programs at the plant level. Moreover, a plan for ramp-up of recently installed
production capacity in Mexico and China is in place and we are evaluating some smaller portfolio
adjustments.
6.2.3 Power
Our power operations are mainly comprised of hydroelectric power plants located in Telemark,
Røldal/Suldal and Sogn in Norway. A separate concession applies to each hydroelectric power plant.
Hydroelectric power plants representing approximately two-thirds, or 6.0 TWh per year, of our
normal production capacity will revert to the Norwegian government under the present
legislation3) without compensation at the expiration date of each concession. The year
of expiration of the individual concessions ranges from 2022 to 2051. Our title concessions on the
remaining part of the hydroelectric production capacity, of approximately 3.8 TWh per year, do not
contain a compulsory reversion to the Norwegian government.
The table below reflects our power production and the volumes acquired under long-term purchase
contracts in Norway for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in TWh) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Power production |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Acquired under long-term contractors for Hydros industrial use |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reflected in the table above, power generation in 2006 was lower than 2005 due to lower than
normal precipitation from January until October of 2006. Power acquired under long-term contracts
in 2006 included 94 GWh generated from the Havøygavlen wind power plants and 12 GWh generated from
Svartdalen, a small hydroelectric power station.
We are a large consumer of power, and the power supply needs for our own industrial plants is
larger than our own power generation. To meet the total demand, we have entered into long-term
purchase contracts, the majority of which are with the Norwegian state-owned power company,
Statkraft. These long-term contracts provide assurance of the availability of and predictable
prices for a certain quantity of power. In 1997, we entered into an agreement with Statkraft to
purchase electricity from 2000 to 2020. The agreement replaces supplies under existing long-term
contracts, which terminate during the 2006-2010 period.
|
|
|
3) |
|
The legislation regarding reversion is under revision. |
6.2.4 Other
6.2.4.1 Polymers
Hydro Polymers is involved in all stages of production of the plastic raw material polyvinyl
chloride (PVC), and its intermediate products, ethylene, chlorine and vinyl chloride monomer (VCM).
We are the largest PVC supplier in the Nordic countries, with a market share of approximately 65
percent. In the United Kingdom, we rank first with approximately 42 percent of the market. The PVC
industry in Europe is relatively fragmented, reflecting the industrys development on a national,
rather than a European, basis. We have an advantage in being backward integrated into ethylene and
with production located in close proximity to our Scandinavian customers with which we have
long-term relationships.
Hydro has a 29.7 percent interest in Qatar Vinyl Company Ltd., which operates a petrochemical plant
at Mesaieed Industrial City, Qatar. The plant has an annual capacity of 300,000 tonnes of VCM,
210,000 tonnes of ethylene dichloride and 360,000 tonnes of caustic soda. In China, we have a 35.2
percent interest in Suzhou Huasu Plastics Co., Ltd., which produces PVC film and has a suspension
PVC (S-PVC) capacity of 130,000 tonnes per year. We also have a 26.2 percent interest in CIRES, a
PVC resin and compound manufacturer in Portugal.
Hydro Information Memorandum
24
In December 2006, we announced that we are considering a public listing or possible divestment of
Hydro Polymers. We believe it is an appropriate time to create new opportunities for Polymers by
re-exploring options for new ownership.
Raw materials and production
We have a 50 percent ownership interest in an ethylene cracker through our joint venture interest
in Noretyl AS. The cracker is integrated with our chlorine and VCM production facilities located at
Rafnes, in Norway. The production efficiencies inherent in an integrated production process
contribute to higher margins compared to margins of competitors that rely on purchased ethylene.
Noretyl produced 522,000 tonnes of ethylene in 2006. This was a record production, mainly as a
result of the substantial debottlenecking project undertaken in the previous year. We now cover
most of our ethylene needs from the production from Noretyl.
Petrochemicals production (in tonnes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Base products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VCM |
|
|
645,000 |
|
|
|
566,000 |
|
|
|
541,000 |
|
Casustic soda |
|
|
406,000 |
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
Polymers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-PVC |
|
|
543,000 |
|
|
|
484,000 |
|
|
|
496,000 |
|
P-PVC |
|
|
97,000 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
Total polymers |
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
|
569,000 |
|
|
|
578,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PVC compounds |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We manufacture PVC at Hydro Polymers AS (Porsgrunn, Norway), Hydro Polymers AB (Stenungsund,
Sweden) and Hydro Polymers Ltd. (Aycliffe, United Kingdom). The Nordic sites produce suspension PVC
(S-PVC) and paste PVC (P-PVC), while the UK site produces S-PVC and PVC compounds. Compounds are
S-PVC with additives in a variety of grades to
meet customer specifications. There is also a small compounding plant at Halsingborg, Sweden. VCM
is produced at Hydros Rafnes and Stenungsund plants.
Ethylene feedstock for the Rafnes facility is supplied by long-term NGL contracts from a number of
North Sea fields covering approximately 80 percent of required volumes. The expansion at Noretyl
and the new long-term NGL contracts have improved the long-term competitiveness of the ethylene
plant.
During the last half of 2006, the old diaphragm chlorine plant at Rafnes, Norway was converted to
membrane technology. The conversion, together with the completion of the new membrane technology
chlorine plant at the site late in 2005, increased the production of caustic soda by 100,000 mt for
2006, compared with 2005.
We transport raw materials and intermediates between our plants in Rafnes, Stenungsund and
Aycliffe. The new ethylene capacities from the Noretyl plant and self-sufficiency on chlorine from
the new chlorine plant at Rafnes, Norway, have reduced the amount of internal transfers of raw
materials and thus increased efficiency and reduced transportation costs.
25
Hydro Information Memorandum
Sales and distribution
PVC and PVC compounds are mainly sold by our own sales organization. Distribution is mainly by
truck. Pipe grade S-PVC is considered to be a commodity product, while there is considerable
product and price differentiation in other S-PVC applications. P-PVC is a specialty product
influenced only to a limited extent by S-PVC price developments.
Caustic soda, a by-product of chlorine production, which is used by a variety of industries such as
paper and pulp, alumina and soap production, is sold to customers in Europe and North America
mainly through our own sales organization. Distribution is by vessel, rail or truck. In addition to
our own production, we trade moderate quantities of caustic soda in the same markets.
Average market quoted prices in Northwest Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Ethylene
delivered euro/tonne |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
VCM Spot export fob USD/tonne |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
S-PVC
delivered euro/tonne |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.4.2 Other
Industriforsikring provides property damage, business interruption, cargo and third party
liability insurance coverage for subsidiary companies of the Hydro Group. Industriforsikring also
provides similar coverage for several related companies where we own a substantial equity interest.
Industriforsikring has an extensive reinsurance program and has maximum exposure per policy varying
from NOK 2.5 million for cargo insurance up to NOK 85 million for third party liability claims
exceeding NOK 1,675 million. Industriforsikring is also a member of a mutual insurance pool in
order to reduce the cost of insurance coverage it provides to our operating units. The operations
of Industriforsikring are not substantial to our overall business and the exposure to uninsured
risk is not material.
Hydro Production Partner is extensively involved in production and maintenance support within Hydro
and also with external customers. The main activities are in Norway. The operations include
approximately 1,500 employees. Hydro Production Partner was established as a wholly-owned
subsidiary as of 31 December 2005.
Other business also includes support services such as procurement, accounting, communication and
human resources, as well as operation of the industrial and business parks in Norway.
6.2.5 Subsequent events
Production at our magnesium plant in Becancour, Canada ceased in the middle of March 2007, and the majority of the
employees left the site by the middle of April 2007. Preparations for the disposal of the plant assets are underway. The
divestment process relating to our magnesium remelters in Germany and China is progressing according to plan.
Alcoa announced on 7 May 2007 that it will be making an offer to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Alcan.
Alcoa said the combined company would see primary aluminum production capacity of 7.9 million tonnes. Its alumina
capacity would be 20.7 million. The offer follows almost two years of discussions between the companies regarding a
variety of potential business combination transactions.
On 21 May 2007, we announced an agreement to sell our polymer activities to the UK-based chemicals company INEOS
for approximately NOK 5.5 billion. We expect an after tax gain of about NOK 400 million when the transaction is
completed which is expected in the third quarter of 2007. The sale is subject to approval by the EU competition
authorities and other relevant governamental bodies. The agreement represents a good long-term industrial solution for
this busienss and is in line with our strategy to focus on aluminium and power production and divest non-core assets.
6.3 Regulation and taxation
6.3.1 Aluminium regulation
Environmental matters
Hydros aluminium business is subject to a broad range of environmental laws and regulations in
each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. These laws and regulations, as interpreted by
relevant agencies and the courts, impose increasingly stringent environmental protection standards
regarding, among other things, air emissions, the storage, treatment and discharge of wastewater,
the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal practices, the marketing and
sale of chemicals, and the remediation of environmental
contamination. The costs of complying with these laws and regulations, including participation in
assessments and remediation of sites, could be significant.
Aluminium production is an energy-intensive process that has the potential to produce significant
environmental emissions, especially air emissions. Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, is a major
emission from primary aluminium production. The European Commission has adopted a directive that
limits carbon dioxide emissions from a broad range of industries and establishes an internal
emission trading system. So far, the aluminium industry has not been included in
Hydro Information Memorandum
26
the
emission-trading directive, but has been exposed to the EU emission trading system through the
indirect effects of regulation of the power generation industry and the resulting increase in power
prices.
In the European Union and other jurisdictions, various protocols address transboundary pollution
controls, including the reduction in emissions from industrial sources of various toxic substances
such as poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, and the control of pollutants that lead to acidification.
The European Union has a framework of environmental directives integrated into the Water Framework
Directive (2000/60/EC) regarding discharges of dangerous substances to water. The implementation of
the directive has started in Europe and must be finalized by 2009. The manner in which this
directive will be interpreted and enforced cannot be predicted. However, based upon the information
currently available, Hydros management does not believe it will have a material negative impact on
its business. The United States has a regulatory permit system limiting the discharge from
facilities to water bodies and publicly owned treatment works, as well as regulations to prohibit
discharges of hazardous substances into groundwater.
Hydro has a number of aluminium facilities that have been operated for a number of years or have
been acquired after operation by other entities. Subsurface contamination of soil and groundwater
has been identified at a number of such sites and may require remediation under the laws of the
various jurisdictions in which the plants are located. Hydro has reserved amounts for sites where
contamination has been identified that, based on presently known facts, it believes will be
sufficient to pay the cost of remediation under existing laws. Because of uncertainties inherent in
making such estimates, it is possible that such estimates could be revised and increased in the
future. In addition, contamination may be determined to exist at additional sites that could
require future expenditure. Therefore, actual costs could be greater than the amounts reserved.
Hydro believes that it is currently in material compliance with the various environmental
regulatory and permitting systems that affect its facilities. However, the effect of new or changed
laws or regulations or permit requirements, or changes in the ways that such laws, regulations or
permit requirements are administered, interpreted or enforced, cannot be predicted.
Oslo and Paris Commission (OSPAR)
The Oslo and Paris Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East
Atlantic has resulted in new discharged levels for the aluminium industry related to the prevention
of marine pollution, which are scheduled for implementation by all signatories to the Convention
before 2007. In accordance with the Oslo and Paris Convention regulations, the Norwegian Pollution
Authority has issued stricter emission permits for primary aluminium plants. As a result, the
Søderberg primary aluminium production line in Høyanger was shut down in February 2006, and the
Søderberg line in Årdal is expected to be closed by the summer of 2007.
Integrated pollution prevention and control
Under the EU Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control 1996/61/EC (the IPPC
directive), from October 2007 existing industrial installations will require national operating
permits, which will be based on best available techniques (BAT) for pollution prevention and
control. The directive already applies to all new installations. The European Commission has issued
a guidance document relevant for the aluminium industry: Best Practice Reference (BREF) for the
Non-Ferrous Metals Industries (2001). In 2000, Norwegian authorities determined stricter emission
limits for the aluminium industry in Norway applicable from 1 January 2007 in line with the IPPC
directive. Hydros aluminium production facilities comply with the new requirements except for the
facilities at Årdal and Karmøy, which have applied for and been granted an extension until 1
October and 30 October 2007, respectively, to comply with the new emission requirements. The
applicable BAT is expected to be revised by the EU in 2007. We believe Hydros aluminium production
facilities are positioned to comply with future expected requirements from both the European and
the Norwegian authorities.
Climate gases
The EU Emissions Trading directive 2003/87/EC establishes a scheme for trading greenhouse gas
emission allowances. The directive introduces limited allowances of carbon dioxide from emissions
for combustion plants and certain specified industry sectors effective as of 1 January 2005, and
has established a trading system whereby regulated facilities may procure and sell allowances
depending on whether their emissions exceed or fall below the allowances allocated to them. The
implementation of this directive in Germany, which resulted in a major pass-through of
CO2 allowance prices by producers to customers, together with little progress in energy
market liberalization throughout Europe, has led to
27
Hydro Information Memorandum
significant and perhaps unintended increases in the price of power, which again have
necessitated restructuring throughout Germanys aluminium industry. All EU Member States national
authorities have set up National Allocation Plans and registries of carbon dioxide emission
allowances. The European Commission is in the process of approving the National Allocation Plans
for the trading period 2008-2012.
This EU directive is also relevant for the EEA. The Norwegian Government has announced that Norway
will join the EU Emissions Trading Scheme from 1 January 2008 and is currently negotiating with the
EU Commission the necessary adjustments in order to implement the EU Emissions Trading directive in
the EEA. The precise details of the Norwegian National Allocation Plan are not yet available. The
aluminium industry is not expected to be included before, at the earliest, 2013, when the third
trading period is expected to start. We believe Hydros aluminium operations are positioned to
comply with the new requirements, when applicable.
The directive presently impacts production costs at Hydros facilities in the EU indirectly through
increased electricity costs.
EU Aluminium tariffs
The EU has an import duty of six percent on non-EU imports of primary aluminium. The EEA, of which
Norway is a member, is exempt from such duty for aluminium metal produced in the EEA.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) round of negotiations on tariff and non-tariff barriers on
industrial products may ultimately lead to a reduction, if not elimination, of aluminium tariffs.
However, it is likely that changes arising from WTO commitments will not be phased in until 2008,
at the earliest. Thus, the WTO negotiations are not expected to have a substantial impact on Hydro
in the near future. The import duty, however, has been subject to debate within the European Union.
The Federation of Aluminium Consumers in Europe, which represents some aluminium-consuming
industries in the EU, has been pressing the EU authorities for the removal of the EUs aluminium
tariff for the past several years. The EU Commission has in January 2007 presented a proposal to
reduce the duty from six percent to three percent retroactively from 1 January 2007, and to
eliminate it completely from 1 January 2009. The EU member states are currently discussing this
proposal. While the reduction of the duty to three percent from 2007 seems to have general support,
its abolition from 2009 is more controversial. A final decision could be taken later in 2007.
Energy taxation
An EU directive on the taxation of energy products became effective on 1 January 2004. The
directive expanded the minimum tax system of energy products from mineral oils to all energy
products, including coal, coke, natural gas and electricity, and sets forth a minimum level of
taxation of energy products in the EU. The directive has so far not made an impact on our
operations, since the taxation level in Germany is higher than the level provided by the directive,
and our electrolysis production in Norway is exempted from the implementation of this directive in
the EEA.
Chemicals legislation REACH
The new European Union Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation,
Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (known as REACH) was adopted in late 2006. Aluminium
is covered by this regulation, which will enter into force in the European Union on 1 June 2007.
The regulation will become applicable in Norway through the EEA-agreement, but the effective date
has not been determined. Indications are that Norway will be implementing it at the same time as
the EU.
The main aim of REACH is to protect the European citizen and the environment from exposure to
hazardous chemicals. This will be achieved by requiring producers and importers of chemicals to
register them formally and to evaluate their health and safety impacts. In some cases, REACH may
require producers and importers to replace hazardous chemicals with those of less concern.
Registration of chemicals will be a lengthy process (over a number of years) and will be
prioritized by volumes produced.
Although REACH compliance is in its early stages of planning, we expect Hydro Aluminium to be
prepared to meet the legal requirements under REACH.
Hydro Information Memorandum
28
6.3.2 Power taxation
Ordinary Income Taxes
Profits from Hydros hydroelectric power production in Norway are subject to ordinary corporate
income tax, currently at 28 percent. Revenue for ordinary income tax purposes is based on realized
prices. Dams, tunnels and power stations are for tax purposes depreciated linearly over 67 years,
and machinery and generators over 40 years. However, such fixed assets are depreciated over the
concession period if that is shorter. Transmission and other electrical equipment is depreciated at
a 5 percent declining balance.
A companys ordinary income tax for hydroelectric power plants is assessed on an aggregate basis
and may be tax consolidated with other activities in Norway. A natural resource tax of NOK 0.013
per KWh is currently levied on hydro-generated electricity. The tax is fully deductible from the
ordinary income tax of the company.
Resource rent tax on hydroelectric power plants
A special resource rent tax is imposed on hydroelectric power production in Norway, which is a tax
on profits above a certain rate of return and is additional to the ordinary income tax. The tax
rate is currently 27 percent and it is assessed individually for each hydroelectric power plant
(i.e., ring-fenced taxation). Unlike the ordinary income tax, financial costs are not deductible
against the basis for the resource rent tax. Uplift is a special deduction in the net income
computed as a percentage of the average tax basis of fixed assets (including intangible assets and
goodwill) for the income year. The percentage, which is determined annually by the Ministry of
Finance, essentially provides for a certain return on fixed assets that is not subject to the
resource rent tax. The percentage used to calculate the uplift for 2006 was 7.2 percent.
Revenue for resource rent tax is, with certain exceptions, not calculated based on realized prices
but on the plants hourly production, multiplied by the area spot price in the
corresponding hour. Revenues from power supplies used for a companys own industrial production
facilities and from sales under certain long-term contracts are not subject to spot price
assessment. As most of Hydros hydroelectric production is used for its own industrial production
or sold under qualifying contracts, only a minor portion of the production is subject to spot price
taxation. Revenue from power production supplied to Hydross own industrial use in Norway was, for
the purpose of calculating the resource rent tax, assessed at 188.45 NOK/MWh in 2006.
Losses in the resource rent assessment can be carried forward indefinitely against future resource
rent income from the same power plant. Losses carried forward are increased by accrued interest.
6.3.3 Other regulation
Environmental matters
Hydros chlorine plant in Stenungsund uses mercury in the production process. As a result of
actions taken by the Swedish authorities, all industrial uses of mercury should cease by 2010. As a
result, a provision of SEK 74 million has been accrued to cover potential clean-up costs. In
addition, it is intended that all elementary mercury and waste containing mercury above threshold
values will be removed and stored in a secure environment by 2015. An accrual of SEK 120 million
has been made for this. There are still some uncertainties regarding economic, technical and
practical aspects of the final treatment and deposition of such waste, and the accruals are based
on qualified best estimates made by an external environmental consulting firm.
Polyvinyl chloride, or PVC, has been the focus of environmental groups due to alleged negative
health and environmental effects arising from the production and use of PVC. Scientific research
has indicated that much of this criticism is unjustified. However, because the requirements imposed
by laws and regulations are frequently changed, laws and regulations enacted in the future,
including changes to existing laws and regulations, could adversely affect Hydro Polymers
business.
The new REACH regulation will affect Hydro Polymers together with the whole of the European
chemicals industry (see also Aluminium regulation in this section). Polymers including PVC are
presently excluded from the regulation but are likely to be included at a later stage. However,
chemicals used in the manufacture of PVC and additives used in formulating PVC compounds are
presently included. Hydro Polymers is presently assessing the impact of this legislation on our
business with the aim to minimize any negative impact and, where possible, to gain a market
advantage against our competitors.
29
Hydro Information Memorandum
In addition, Hydro Polymers is subject to other environmental laws and regulations in the different
jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations impose increasingly stringent
environmental protection standards regarding, among other things, air emissions, the storage,
treatment and discharge of waste waters, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials,
waste disposals practices, and the remediation of environmental contamination. The cost of
complying with these laws and regulations, including participation in assessments and remediation
of sites, could be significant.
6.4 Financial review
6.4.1 Introduction
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Aluminium Metal |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Aluminium Products |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
1,072 |
|
Power |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
Other activities |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
274 |
|
Corporate
and elimination |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
7,808 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income for 2006 rose to NOK 7,808 million, up from NOK 4,423 million in 2005. Operating
income for 2006 included NOK 890 million related to impairments and other costs resulting from the
restructuring of our aluminium products operations. Operating income for 2005 included impairment
losses of NOK 1.2 billion relating to our magnesium and rolled products businesses.
We made good headway developing our aluminium businesses during the year. The restructuring of our
aluminium products operations progressed well during the year and our efforts to significantly
improve our smelter cost position are on track.
6.4.2 Overview, operating income, outlook
6.4.2.1 Aluminium Metal
Overview
Hydros aluminium metal business achieved record high operating income for 2006 of NOK 6,362
million, mainly due to the significant increase in realized aluminium prices during the
year combined with good cost control in a high cost environment. Increased raw material and energy
costs negatively impacted the results, in addition to costs related to the closures of the Stade
metal plant in Germany and the Søderberg production lines in the Norwegian plants in Høyanger and
Årdal.
Efforts to reposition our upstream aluminium operations are on track. During 2005 and 2006, we
closed down 110,000 mt of high-cost annual primary production capacity. This was partly replaced by
new, low-cost capacity from the expansion of the Alouette smelter in Canada (Hydro share 20
percent) and incremental increases at other plants in our smelter system. We expect to complete the
closure of an additional 70,000 mt of annual capacity during 2007. These measures aim to
significantly improve our smelter cost position.
Hydro Information Memorandum
30
In order to deliver our strategy for repositioning and growth, we are evaluating a number of
projects globally to expand our upstream aluminium metal business. New smelter projects are being
explored in areas where energy can be secured on a long-term basis at competitive prices. We are
also pursuing several new bauxite and alumina opportunities globally. A key priority is to further
develop these opportunities into profitable bauxite, alumina and smelter projects.
Preparations for the Qatalum primary aluminium plant (Hydro share 50 percent) continued during
2006. The estimated total investment cost for the project is in the range of USD 4.5 billion (100
percent). A final cost estimate and a decision to proceed with the project are expected in 2007.
The Qatalum project is a major element in our strategy for growth and repositioning our primary
production aimed at increasing capacity in a location with long-term competitively priced energy
and attractive logistics for primary metal.
Alumina and energy are key cost drivers for the primary aluminium industry. The significant
increase in power costs in major aluminium producing regions such as Europe and the United States
has been an important factor leading to higher aluminium prices. Power costs relating to our
ongoing primary production increased by roughly NOK 1.4 billion during 2006, compared with 2005.
The power cost increase for 2007 is expected to be in the magnitude of NOK 300 million for
continuing operations, compared with 2006. Our long-term power contract portfolio is expected to
ensure fairly stable cost levels for future years.
Increased alumina costs accounted for about two-thirds of the substantial upward shift in the
industry cost curve between 2003 2006. Approximately 55 percent of our alumina requirements were
met through equity production in 2006, the most important being our 34 percent interest in Alunorte
in Brazil. During 2006, the second expansion of the Alunorte refinery was completed. A third
expansion was started in 2006 with the aim to increase total annual production capacity up to 6.5
million mt by 2009, thereby increasing the amount of annual alumina coverage including for
Qatalum expected to be provided from our equity alumina production to approximately 70 75
percent.
Developments in China continue to be a main driver of industry fundamentals. Relatively small
changes in Chinese supply and demand can lead to substantial changes in the global metal balance.
Strong increases in global alumina production capacities, particularly in China, have caused a
sharp drop in alumina spot prices. A combination of low spot prices together with high aluminium
prices are expected to lead to increased smelter capacity utilization, especially in China. At the
same time, Chinas growth in consumption is expected to continue and is estimated to be 20 percent
in 2007.
Operating
income
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Aluminium Metal |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
Operating statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Primary aluminium production (1,000mt)1) |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
Realized aluminium price LME (USD/mt)2) |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
Realized aluminium price LME (NOK/mt)3) |
|
|
15,371 |
|
|
|
11,813 |
|
|
|
11,403 |
|
Realized NOK/USD exchange rate |
|
|
6,54 |
|
|
|
6,52 |
|
|
|
7,00 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Includes Søral and HAW volumes (non-consolidated investees) |
|
|
2) |
|
Includes the effect of strategic and operational LME hedges |
|
|
3) |
|
Includes the effect of strategic currency hedges |
Operating income amounted to NOK 6,362 million for the year, heavily influenced by a substantial
increase in aluminium prices. However results for the year were negatively impacted by increased
costs and charges described below. In addition, operating results for the year were influenced by
realized and unrealized gains and losses relating to strategic and operational hedge programs.
31
Hydro Information Memorandum
Realized prices measured in Norwegian kroner increased 30 percent for 2006, compared with 2005,
contributing about NOK 6,200 million to operating income, and 4 percent in 2005 compared with 2004.
Raw material and energy costs related to primary production increased by approximately NOK 3,100
million for the year, compared with 2005. Our average cash cost of equity alumina production
increased from USD 167 per mt in 2005 to approximately USD 195 per mt in 2006 due to high energy
prices, currency effects and high bauxite prices resulting from the increased LME prices. Operating
costs for 2005 were impacted by increased costs related to new capacity amounting to NOK 819
million and higher raw material and energy costs of NOK 1,717 million compared with 2004. In
addition, costs relating to the closures of the Stade metal plant in Germany and the Søderberg
production lines in the Norwegian plants in Årdal and Høyanger amounted to NOK 560 million for
2006, compared with NOK 200 million in 2005. Costs of about NOK 150 million related to the Qatalum
project were expensed in 2006, while NOK 70 million was expensed over the years 2004 and 2005.
Unrealized losses on power contracts amounting to NOK 290 million also impacted the result for
2006.
Primary aluminium production, including production from partly-owned companies, decreased slightly
to 1,799,000 mt in 2006 from 1,826,000 mt in 2005, due to closures of the Hamburger Aluminium Werk
(HAW) smelter in Germany and the Søderberg production line at Høyanger. The reduced capacity was
mostly offset by increased production from the expansion of the Alouette plant in Canada and record
production levels for other plants in our smelter system. Primary aluminium production increased by
6 percent in 2005, compared with 2004.
Operating income for sourcing and trading operations amounted to NOK 157 million in 2006 compared
with an operating income of NOK 575 million in 2005 and NOK 383 million in 2004. Unrealized effects
on LME and currency contracts related to the sourcing and trading operations which are excluded
from these amounts4), amounted to a net negative effect of about NOK 437 million in 2006 compared
with a positive effect of NOK 210 million in 2005 and NOK 285 million in 2004. Operating results
relating to alumina sales increased in 2006 compared with 2005, as well as 2004.
|
4) |
|
Marked-to-market adjustments on LME contracts entered into by Hydros sourcing and
trading operating unit are excluded from the results reported for this operating unit.
These effects are evaluated for the business area as a whole and not on an individual
operating unit basis. When realized, gains and losses on LME contracts are included in the
various unit results. In addition, the results exclude gains and losses on currency
contracts purchased to hedge currency positions resulting from operations, which are
included in financial items. |
Outlook
Production of primary aluminium in the western world is expected to increase about 4 percent in
2007 and globally about 8.5 percent. Global primary aluminium consumption, however, is expected to
grow by less (about 7 percent) in 2007. Consumption growth in Europe is
expected to slow down to about 2.5 percent in 2007, somewhat lower than the expected increase in
industrial production. A minor decline of about 1 percent is expected for the US. Chinas growth in
both production and consumption of primary aluminium is expected to continue at a high level in
2007, close to 20 percent. A moderate surplus is expected in the global metal balance in 2007 as a
result of a decline in the consumption growth rate and increasing production. In addition, the
behaviour of financial investors continues to be an important factor affecting the development of
primary aluminium prices on the LME.
Continued high aluminium prices and lower spot alumina prices could lead to restarts of shut-down
capacity, particularly in China, where capacity utilization is expected to increase from about 76
percent in 2006 to about 85 percent in 2007. Based on this increase in capacity utilization, net
primary aluminium exports from China could reach one million mt in 2007, depending on developments
in domestic consumption and increases in net exports of semi-fabricated aluminium products.
In 2005 and early 2006, there was a tight supply and demand balance for alumina, resulting in
significant increases in spot alumina prices. However, during the second quarter 2006 the market
changed dramatically and spot alumina prices fell on the basis of an expected alumina surplus in
the market in 2006 and an even more significant surplus position in 2007. Lower prices in the spot
market are also influencing the medium and long-term markets, a situation which is expected to
continue. Driving this development was a substantial alumina production increase in China of more
than 50 percent in 2006, combined with major brownfield expansions in other important
alumina-producing countries. Early in 2007, spot alumina prices have temporarily recovered due to
delays in alumina projects and bauxite production disturbances.
Hydro Information Memorandum
32
Electricity prices in Europe, and in most of the United States, are expected to remain at high
levels in 2007.
Volatility in the aluminium market is expected to continue and could result in substantial
unrealized gains and losses related to our operational LME hedge program in future
quarters.5)
|
5) |
|
We use financial derivatives to manage and hedge unfavorable fluctuations in
prices in order to minimize the exposure of LME price fluctuations on our net margins.
Certain contracts are marked-to-market value in the balance sheet with unrealized gains and
losses reflected in operating results for the period or deferred if certain hedge
accounting criteria are met. Offsetting gains and losses on physical contracts within
Hydros total portfolio that are not marked-to-market value are recognized when realized
(i.e., when the contractual volumes are sold). This can result in significant deviations
between results from physical positions and contracts and off-setting results from
derivative hedges in any given period. |
6.4.2.2 Aluminium Products
Overview
Aluminium Products incurred an operating loss of NOK 83 million in 2006, compared with an operating
loss of NOK 370 million in 2005 and an operating income of NOK 1,072 million in 2004. Our European
extrusion and global building systems delivered a strong performance during 2006. However, the 2006
results were heavily influenced by write-downs and charges related to our ongoing restructuring and
divestment program.
We plan to continue to restructure and improve the financial performance of our aluminium products
portfolio during 2007. At the end of 2007, our portfolio should consist of businesses well
positioned to deliver viable returns. Further divestments and plant rationalization efforts are
planned, and we expect additional charges relating to plant rationalization costs in 2007. Results
for our rolled products business improved during 2006 but the market remains challenging. However,
we are generating good cash flow from this business and intend to improve and develop our
operations and build on our role as a key player within this market sector.
As part of our drive to increase the profitability of our downstream operations, we decided to exit
the automotive castings business and, in November 2006, we announced the sale of this business. The
sale was finalized on 1 March 2007 resulting in a gain of about NOK 900 million. In December 2006,
we announced the divestment of our 49 percent share in the magnesium automotive castings company,
Meridian Technologies Inc. The sale was finalized on 2 March 2007 with a gain of approximately NOK
50 million. During the third quarter of 2006, we wrote down the value of our investment in Meridian
by NOK 239 million. We are currently evaluating alternative opportunities relating to the
divestment of our automotive structures business.
During 2006, the global magnesium market continued to weaken from an already poor level in 2005.
Competition from Chinese magnesium producers resulted in an oversupply of magnesium on the world
market, driving down prices. We see limited potential for improvement in this market. In October
2006, we decided to exit this business following the closure of our magnesium plant in Porsgrunn,
Norway in 2002 and termination of remelting operations at Porsgrunn in 2006. Our plant in
Becancour, Canada is expected to be closed by the end of first quarter 2007 and work is ongoing
towards divesting our remaining remelting operations in Germany and China.
Rationalization programs have been initiated in several units in 2006, including our extrusion
activities both in the UK and in the US, and our precision tubing activities in North America.
These rationalization efforts are part of a comprehensive portfolio-restructuring program with the
aim to lift our financial performance to a viable level for the long-term. Total rationalization-
and closure costs and fixed asset impairments amounted to NOK 890 million in 2006.
33
Hydro Information Memorandum
Operating income
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Rolled Products |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Extrusion |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
Other and eliminations |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
During fourth quarter 2006 Hydro entered agreements to divest its casting business. As a result, the
casting business was reclassified as an asset held for sale and reported as a discontinued
operations and is excluded from the operating results of Aluminium Products for the current and
all prior periods in the report. |
Aluminium Products incurred an operating loss amounting to NOK 83 million for 2006, compared with
an operating loss of NOK 370 million in 2005 and an operating profit of NOK 1,072 million in 2004.
In December 2005, we announced plans to restructure our aluminium products business. Following a
thorough review of the downstream portfolio, measures were taken to implement these plans,
including divestments, closures and significant plant rationalizations. We made good progress in
2006 on the restructuring, but results were heavily impacted by the related impairments and
rationalization costs amounting to about NOK 890 million for the year as well as a UK pension fund
contribution of NOK 380 million. 2005 results included losses of about NOK 1,450 million related to
impairments in our magnesium and rolled products operations and closure costs in our automotive
castings operations in the UK.
Overall market conditions for extrusion and rolled products improved during 2006 contributing to an
improved underlying financial performance. However, the automotive business sector continued to
suffer challenging market conditions and declining margins.
Outlook
Global growth in semi-finished aluminium products in the last 10 years has been led by China, and
it is expected that China will continue to expand strongly over the medium term. The fastest
growing sector over the past decade has been the transport sector, which is expected to maintain a
robust expansion in the medium term, partly due to further increase in the use of aluminium in the
motor vehicle sector. A continued gain in aluminium use is also expected in many other sectors. The
other major driver of consumption of semi-finished products is the general economic growth which is
expected to remain strong on a global basis.
The pace of the European economy at the beginning of 2007 remains solid and shipments to the
European rolled products and extrusion markets are expected to remain strong, although with a
certain pressure on margins remaining. Growth estimates for Western Europe are 2 percent and 1.4
percent, respectively, for flat rolled products and extrusions in 2007.
Electricity prices in Europe are expected to remain at high levels and are expected to cause higher
costs for our European downstream operations in 2007, compared with 2006.
The US economy shows increasing signs of continued softening, especially visible in the adverse
development of the housing market. Even so, overall consumption of all semi-finished aluminium
products in North America and Mexico is expected to grow at a very moderate pace in 2007, and
consumption of flat rolled products and extrusions in North America is expected to remain rather
flat in 2007 compared to 2006. While the global light vehicle automotive market is expected to grow
moderately during 2007, developments in the United States are expected to be flat.
Continued strong growth is expected in Argentina whereas a more moderate development is expected in
Brazil.
Hydro Information Memorandum
34
6.4.3 Aluminium Metal
6.4.3.1 Market conditions
Market statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
LME three month average (USD/mt) |
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
LME three month average (NOK/mt) |
|
|
16,628 |
|
|
|
12,236 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
Global production of primary aluminium (1,000mt) |
|
|
33,800 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
29,900 |
|
Global consumption of primary aluminium (1,000mt) |
|
|
34,200 |
|
|
|
31,900 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
Reported
primary aluminium inventories (1,000mt) |
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
The average market price for aluminium (LME three month average) increased 36 percent to USD 2,594,
compared with 2005. Overall market fundamentals were favorable in 2006, led by consumption growth
and low inventory levels. Global consumption and production of primary metal increased by around 7
and 6 percent, respectively, in 2006.
China continued to demonstrate strong growth in aluminium production and consumption, both
increasing by around 18 percent in 2006, compared with 2005. Chinese net exports of primary metal
during 2006 amounted to approximately 700,000 mt. Adjusted for net imports of scrap metal, and
including net exports of rolled and extruded products, as well as other fabricated products, China
was, for the first time, a net exporter of aluminium, estimated at about 500,000 mt for the year.
Financial investors maintained a high activity level on the LME during 2006, increasing their net
aluminium positions and adding volatility to the market.
6.4.3.2 Key development projects
Following the signing of the joint venture agreement between Hydro and Qatar Petroleum in
March 2006 (Hydros share 50 percent), the project is progressing according to schedule. A final
decision by the partners to proceed with the project is expected to be made in 2007.
During 2006, the second expansion of the Alunorte refinery was completed (Hydros share 34
percent), increasing capacity to approximately 4.4 million mt. In 2005, Hydro decided to
participate in a third expansion targeting a total annual production capacity of 6.5 million mt by
2009. When completed, we expect approximately 70 75 percent of our annual alumina requirements,
including for Qatalum, to be provided from our equity alumina production.
6.4.3.3 Plant closures
Total costs related to the closure of the Norwegian Søderberg lines in Høyanger and Årdal and
the German metal plants in Hamburg and Stade are expected to be somewhat lower than NOK 1 billion.
Of the total estimated amount, NOK 560 million was expensed in 2006 and NOK 200 million was
expensed in 2005. The remaining costs are expected to be incurred in 2007. The production at the
Stade smelter was fully shut down in December 2006. The Søderberg line in Høyanger was shut down in
February 2006, and the Søderberg line in Årdal is expected to be closed by the summer of 2007.
More stringent air emissions restrictions related to the Søderberg line at our Karmøy plant will
become effective in November 2007. In February 2007, an application to continue production on the
line until the end of 2009 was declined by the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority SFT. We have
appealed this decision to the Norwegian Ministry of the Environment.
35
Hydro Information Memorandum
6.4.3.4 Revenues, costs and income
Aluminium Metal 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
68,405 |
|
|
|
54,579 |
|
|
|
51,957 |
|
Operating cost |
|
|
62,043 |
|
|
|
51,885 |
|
|
|
51,172 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
9,134 |
|
|
|
4,821 |
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
RoaCE |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Number of employees |
|
|
5,286 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Effective 1 February 2006, Hydro decided to split Aluminium into two business areas. Aluminium Metal and
Aluminium Products. Aluminium Metal consists of the previous Metals sub-segments. Prior periods
have been restated to be comparable. |
Variance analysis Aluminium Metal
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income 2006 |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
Operating income 2005 |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
3,665 |
|
Volume |
|
|
80 |
|
Fixed costs |
|
|
(270 |
) |
Deprecation |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Trading & price hedging1) |
|
|
(1,175 |
|
Unrealized LME effects |
|
|
1,800 |
|
Infrequent items |
|
|
(495 |
) |
Other |
|
|
105 |
|
|
Total change in operating income |
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Including realized effects from the strategic hedge program. |
Operating revenues
Operating revenues increased 25 percent to NOK 68,405 million in 2006, compared with 2005 and 5
percent in 2005, compared with 2004. Results for 2006 reflected a significant increase in aluminium
prices. Our realized aluminium prices increased 29 percent to US dollar 2,352 million per mt in
2006, compared with 2005. In 2005, our realized aluminium prices increased by 11 percent, compared
with 2004. Measured in Norwegian kroner, our realized aluminium prices increased by approximately
30 percent in 2006 and 4 percent in 2005.
Primary metal production volumes decreased slightly to 1,799,000 mt in 2006, compared with 2005.
Production declines due to closures of the German metal plant in Hamburg and the Søderberg
production line at Høyanger in Norway were mostly offset by increased production from the expansion
of the Alouette plant in Canada and record production levels for other plants in our smelter
system. Primary metal volumes increased by 6 percent in 2005, compared with 2004. The increase
resulted primarily from the expansions of the Sunndal plant in Norway and the Alouette plant in
Canada of approximately 56,000 mt and about 48,000 mt respectively.
Hydro Information Memorandum
36
Operating statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Primary aluminium production (1,000 mt)1) |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
Realized aluminium price LME (USD/mt)2) |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Includes Søral and HAW volumes (non-consolidated investees). |
|
|
2) |
|
Includes the effect of strategic and operational LME hedges. |
Metal effects and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
LME future contracts, realized (strategic hedges)1) |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
US dollar forward contracts, realized (strategic hedges)1) |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
LME future contracts, unrealised (operational hedges)2) |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
1) |
|
Strategic hedge programs (hedge accounting) will continue to impact reported results during
2007. The LME future contracts and US dollar forward contracts underlying the hedge in the Sunndal
program were priced at approximately US dollar 1,500 and NOK/USD 9.4, respectively, for the remainder
of the program. An additional hedge program was implemented during the first quarter of 2006, for
the period 2006-2008. The program consists of LME contracts, sold at an average price of
approximately US dollar 2,225 (power prices are fixed for corresponding production volumes by
contracts evaluated at market value). The remaining hedged volumes for 2007 2008 amounted to
371,000 mt at the end of the fourth quarter of 2006, of which 290,000 mt relates to the program
entered into during the first quarter of 2006. |
|
|
2) |
|
Charges in the market value of open LME derivative contracts relate mainly to operational
hedges. Offsetting changes to the value of the hedged contracts, which are not market to their
market value, are not reflected in the results until realized. |
During 2006, we supplied 3.5 million mt of casthouse products to the market, an increase of roughly
4 percent from 2005. External sales of casthouse products represented about 50 percent of total
metal sales for the year. About 52 percent of the tonnage supplied originated from our own primary
metal production (on an equity basis), while approximately 40 percent consisted of re-melted or
recycled material, and 8 percent was provided from commercial agreements.
Operating costs
Operating costs increased about 20 percent in 2006 compared with 2005. Raw material and power costs
related to primary aluminium production increased by about NOK 3.1 billion in 2006. Our average
cash cost of equity alumina production increased from USD 167 per mt in 2005 to approximately USD
195 per mt in 2006 due to high energy prices, currency effects and high bauxite prices resulting
from the increased LME prices. About NOK 6 billion of the remaining increase related to remelting
activities and reflected the effects of substantially higher LME prices on raw material costs of
casthouse products. Operating costs also include the costs related to the plant closures discussed
above. Operating costs for 2005 were
impacted by increased costs relating to higher production volumes from new capacity amounting to
NOK 819 million and higher raw material and energy costs of NOK 1,717 million. Operating costs for
2004 included the impairment losses of NOK 2,042 million relating to our German primary metal
plants in addition to manning reduction costs of about NOK 500 million.
Operating income
Operating income increased substantially to NOK 6,362 million in 2006, mainly as a result of the
significant increase in aluminium prices, compared with 2005. In addition, operating income was
influenced by realized and unrealized gains and losses relating to strategic and operational hedge
programs included in the table above. Unrealized losses on power contracts amounting to NOK 290
million also impacted the result for the year.
Premiums on casthouse products improved in 2006, particularly in Europe, compared to 2005, making
positive contribution to margins in 2006 compared to 2005. In the US, reduced production had a
negative impact on margins. Operating income for sourcing and trading operations amounted to NOK
157 million in 2006 compared with an operating income of NOK 575 million in 2005, and NOK 383
million in 2004. Unrealized effects on LME and currency contracts related to the sourcing and
trading operations which are excluded from these amounts6), amounted to a net negative
effect of about NOK 437 million in 2006 compared with a positive effect of NOK 210 million in 2005,
and NOK 285 million
37
Hydro Information Memorandum
in 2004. Operating results relating to alumina sales increased in 2006 compared
with 2005.
|
6) |
|
Marked-to-market adjustments on LME contracts entered into by Hydros sourcing and
trading operating unit are excluded from the results reported for this operating unit. These
effects are evaluated for the business area as a whole and not on an individual operating unit
basis. When realized, gains and losses on LME contracts are included in the various units results.
In addition, the results exclude gains and losses on currency contracts purchased to hedge currency
positions resulting from operations, which are included in financial items. |
Hydro Information Memorandum
38
6.4.4. Aluminium Products
Aluminium Products1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
49,844 |
|
|
|
42,477 |
|
|
|
43,533 |
|
Operating costs |
|
|
49,927 |
|
|
|
42,847 |
|
|
|
42,461 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
1,072 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
RoaCE |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
(3.2 |
%) |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Number of employees |
|
|
19,370 |
|
|
|
18,997 |
|
|
|
19,520 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Effective 1 February 2006, Hydro decided to split Aluminium into two business areas. Aluminium
Metal and Aluminium Products. Aluminium Products consists of the previous Rolled Products and
Extrusion and Automotive sub-segments. Prior periods have been restated to be comparable. |
During fourth quarter 2006 Hydro entered agreements to divest its castings business. As a result,
the castings business was reclassified as an asset held for sale and reported as a discontinued
operations and is excluded from the operating results of Aluminium products for the current and all
prior periods in the report.
Metal effects and unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Metal effect1) |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Unrealized results operational LME hedges2) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Rolled Products sales prices are based on a margin over the metal price. The
production and logistic process of Rolled Products lasts two to three months. As a result,
margins are impacted by timing differences resulting from the FIFO (first in, first out)
inventory valuation method, due to changing aluminium prices during the production process.
Decreasing aluminium prices in Euro results in a negative metal effect, while increasing
prices have a positive effect on margins. |
|
|
2) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses result from marked-to-market valuation of open LME
derivative contracts related to operational hedges, which are reported as part of
eliminations for various units in Aluminium Products utilizing derivatives to mitigate
their LME price exposure. Gains and losses on the LME contracts are included in the
various units results when realized. Offsetting changes to the value of the hedged
contracts, which are not marked to their market value are not reflected in the results
until realized. |
6.4.4.1 Market conditions
Global consumption of aluminium semi-finished products increased by around 6.4 percent in
2006, while consumption of both flat rolled products and extruded products increased by 4 to 5
percent, compared with 2005. The European and North American markets for semi-finished products
both grew about 3 to 3.5 percent, while China and other emerging markets fuelled an even stronger
growth in global demand. Transportation and electrical components were the strongest growing
end-use market segments.
Following stronger economic development in Europe, the market for standard rolled products improved
during 2006 with good order activity. Estimates indicate an increase of about 4.5 percent for 2006,
compared with 2005, contributing to improve a challenging margin situation. Consumption of rolled
products in the US in 2006 was flat compared with 2005 and an increasing share of the market demand
was covered by low-cost imports.
During 2006 European consumption of extruded aluminium products was influenced by strong underlying
demand. Orders throughout Europe improved even though orders in southern Europe appeared to soften
slightly towards the end of the year. Forecasts indicate that consumption of extrusions in 2006
rose by 4 percent, compared with 2005.
In the US, orders for extruded aluminium products improved during the first half of 2006 but
declined during the second half. Estimates indicate that shipments for 2006 as a whole were at the
same level as in 2005. Negative developments within the residential construction market were offset
by positive developments within the commercial and institutional
39
Hydro Information Memorandum
construction market. Orders in the truck and trailer market were good in the first part of 2006 but
softened significantly during the year.
Estimated global automotive sales increased by 3.4 percent for 2006, compared with 2005, driven by
growth in emerging markets. North American sales were down 2 percent and the big three US producers
were down significantly more, losing market share to Asian and European car manufacturers. Sales in
Western Europe were slightly up by 0.8 percent in 2006 compared with 20057).
7) Industry statistics have been derived from analyst reports, trade associations and other public
sources unless otherwise indicated.
6.4.4.2 Key development activities
As part of our drive to increase the profitability of our downstream operations, we have
decided to exit the automotive castings businesses. We are currently evaluating alternative
opportunities relating to the divestment of our automotive structures business.
Following the conclusion of the divestments described above, our remaining automotive business will
be comprised solely of our precision tubing operating sector. This business makes products used
primarily within radiators, evaporators, fuel coolers and liquid lines. We believe that we have a
significant market presence in Europe, North and South America as well as China and that we are the
only player with operations in all major regions. Although the automotive market remains the main
business our precision tubing operating sector will also support customers in developing
non-automotive applications. We intend to continue significant rationalization and improvement
efforts to improve the operational and financial performance of this business, in particular in
connection with our North American operations.
6.4.4.3 Plant closures
During 2006, the global magnesium market continued to weaken from an already poor level in
2005. Competition from Chinese magnesium producers resulted in an oversupply of magnesium on the
world market driving down prices. We see limited potential for improvement in this market. In
October 2006, we decided to exit this business following the closure of our primary magnesium plant
in Porsgrunn, Norway in 2002 and termination of remelting operations in Porsgrunn in 2006. Our
plant in Becancour, Canada is expected to be closed by the end of first quarter 2007 and work is
ongoing towards divesting our remaining remelting operations in Germany and China.
During 2006 we also evaluated our extrusion operations in the UK and identified a need to reduce
our extrusion capacity and adjust our overall business portfolio related to extrusion operations.
As a consequence of this we have closed one extrusion press and
one fabrication plant in the UK. Additional plant closures are being evaluated as part of our
ongoing rationalization program.
Hydro Information Memorandum
40
6.4.4.4 Revenues, costs and income
6.4.4.4.1 Rolled products
Rolled Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
23,227 |
|
|
|
19,490 |
|
|
|
20,288 |
|
Operating costs |
|
|
22,445 |
|
|
|
18,735 |
|
|
|
19,663 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
Number of employees |
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
|
|
4,013 |
|
|
Variance analysis Rolled Products
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income 2006 |
|
|
782 |
|
Operating income 2005 |
|
|
754 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
190 |
|
Volume |
|
|
270 |
|
Fixed costs |
|
|
(630 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
95 |
|
Infrequent items |
|
|
100 |
|
|
Total change in operating income |
|
|
27 |
|
|
Operating revenues
Operating revenues increased approximately 19 percent to NOK 23,227 million in 2006, compared with
2005, following higher volumes and improved margins as well as an increase in metal costs
reflecting significantly higher LME prices.
Operating revenues declined approximately 4 percent to NOK 19,490 million in 2005, compared with
2004, due to reduced margins and lower Euro revenues from US dollar denominated export sales
offsetting the positive effects of higher volumes and increased sales prices reflecting higher
metal costs. Revenues measured in Norwegian kroner declined further due to the stronger NOK/EUR
exchange rate.
Shipments increased around 5 percent to just over one million mt in 2006 compared to 953 thousand
mt in 2005. In 2006, shipments of strip products and foil increased by 8 and 1 percent,
respectively, while shipment of lithographic sheets declined by 1 percent. Shipments of strip
products, foil and lithographic sheet amounted to 68 percent, 16
percent and 16 percent, respectively, of total shipments for 2006. About 21 percent of Rolled
Products volumes were sold outside of Europe, mainly to Asia and the Americas. Shipments increased
by 1 percent in 2005 from 941 thousand mt in 2004. In 2005, shipments of strip declined by 2
percent while shipments of foil and lithographic increased by 2 and 14 percent, respectively.
41
Hydro Information Memorandum
Operating costs
Operating costs increased by approximately 20 percent to NOK 22,445 million in 2006, compared with
2005. The increase was mainly due to higher metal costs as a result of the significant increase in
LME prices. In addition, costs increased as a consequence of higher volumes and increased energy
prices. Energy costs increased by about NOK 185 million in 2006, compared with 2005.
Operating costs declined 5 percent to NOK 18,735 million in 2005, compared with 2004. The decline
resulted from a reversal of loss accruals, cost reduction programs and settlements received related
to our operations in Malaysia, in addition to the effects of a stronger NOK/EUR exchange rate.
Operating costs in 2005 included an impairment loss relating to our Inasa rolled products plant in
Spain amounting to NOK 154 million. Operating costs were also influenced by metal effects indicated
in the table above.
Operating income
Operating income in 2006 increased about 4 percent to NOK 782 million, compared with 2005. Margins
increased, compared with 2005 as result of positive metal effects. Operating income increased 20
percent in 2005 to NOK 754 million compared with 2004, due to increased shipments, further
optimization of product mix and reduced capacity related costs.
6.4.4.4.2 Extrusion
Extrusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
20,418 |
|
|
|
16,826 |
|
|
|
17,137 |
|
Operating costs |
|
|
20,186 |
|
|
|
16,551 |
|
|
|
16,531 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
Number of employees |
|
|
9,635 |
|
|
|
9,430 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
Variance analysis Extrusion
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income 2006 |
|
|
231 |
|
Operating income 2005 |
|
|
272 |
|
Change |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
195 |
|
Volume |
|
|
455 |
|
Fixed costs |
|
|
(195 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
70 |
|
Infrequent items |
|
|
(535 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
Total change in operating income |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
42
Operating revenues
Operating revenues in 2006 amounted to NOK 20,418 million, increasing by about 21 percent, compared
with 2005. In addition to an increase in prices resulting from the significant increase in LME
prices, revenues were influenced by increased volumes. Shipments in Europe increased by about 12
percent, including higher shipments relating to building systems. In North America, shipments were
at approximately the same level as in 2005. Margins improved moderately in 2006 compared with 2005.
Operating revenues in Norwegian kroner declined about 2 percent in 2005, compared with 2004, due to
lower shipments and a strengthened NOK/EUR exchange rate.
Operating costs
Operating costs for 2006 increased by 22 percent to NOK 20,186 million, compared with 2005. In
addition to the effects of higher LME prices and increased volumes, operating costs in 2006
included an amount of about NOK 585 million, mainly comprised of an impairment of our extrusion
operations in Ellenville, US, charges relating to the rationalization of our extrusion operations
in the UK and US and costs related to pension plan contributions in the UK. Operating costs were at
the same level in 2005 as in 2004, despite lower volumes, primarily due to provisions for bad debts
in 2005.
Operating income
Operating income declined by NOK 44 million to NOK 231 million for 2006, compared with 2005.
Negative effects relating to the impairment, rationalization and other costs described above were
partly offset by improved volumes and margins. Operating income declined by NOK 331 million to NOK
275 million in 2005, compared with 2004. The decline was due to reduced margins for extruded
products, in addition to higher costs.
6.4.4.4.3 Automotive
Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
6,463 |
|
|
|
6,423 |
|
|
|
7,363 |
|
Operating costs |
|
|
7,469 |
|
|
|
8,002 |
|
|
|
7,763 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Number of employees |
|
|
5,460 |
|
|
|
5,586 |
|
|
|
5,507 |
|
|
Variance analysis Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
NOK million |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income 2006 |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
Operating income 2005 |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
Change |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin |
|
|
(520 |
) |
Volume |
|
|
120 |
|
Fixed costs |
|
|
190 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
160 |
|
Infrequent items |
|
|
635 |
|
Other |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
Total change in operating income |
|
|
573 |
|
|
43
Hydro Information Memorandum
Operating revenues
Operating revenues amounted to NOK 6,463 million in 2006, slightly up from NOK 6,423 million in
2005. The positive impact on revenues from higher LME prices and increased aluminium volumes was offset by
lower magnesium volumes, unfavourable product mix effects and reduced margins. Operating revenues
in 2005 declined 13 percent to NOK 7,363 million in 2004 mainly due to reduced shipments and the
effects of a strengthened NOK/EUR exchange rate on Euro denominated sales.
Operating costs
Operating costs for 2006 amounted to NOK 7,469 million including costs amounting to about NOK 640
million, mainly relating to the closures of our magnesium operations in Becancour and Porsgrunn and
fixed asset impairments. In 2005, operating costs amounted to NOK 8,002 million, including an
impairment loss of NOK 1,084 million relating to our magnesium operations and about NOK 211 million
relating to the closure of our automotive castings operation in the UK. Operating costs in 2006
also reflected increased metal costs as a consequence of higher LME prices.
Operating income
We incurred operating losses in our automotive business in 2006 and 2005 of NOK 1,006 million and
NOK 1,579 million, respectively, largely as a result of the impairment and other costs described
above. Declining margins also impacted our 2006 operating results, partly offset by higher volumes
and fixed cost reductions, resulting in a net negative impact of NOK 200 million, compared to 2005.
Results in 2006 were positively impacted by lower depreciation expense amounting to NOK 160
million.
6.4.5 Power
Operating income from power activities increased by 6 percent to NOK 1,173 million in 2006 compared
with 2005, due to higher electricity prices. Nordic electricity prices in 2006 have been
significantly higher than 2005, with a growth of 66 percent to NOK 391 per MWh. The increase in
prices resulted from record low water reservoir levels in 2006. However, wet and warm weather
toward the end of 2006 increased the reservoirs up to normal levels.
Power production declined due to lower precipitation in the three first quarters in 2006 compared
to 2005. Our reservoir levels at the end of 2006 were above normal level and slightly above the
level at the end of 2005. The increase in operating income from power activities in 2005, compared
to 2004, resulted from higher production.
6.4.6. Other
6.4.6.1 Polymers
Operating income for Polymers amounted to NOK 1,029 million in 2006, compared with NOK 69 million
in 2005 and NOK 254 million in 2004.
Operating income increased substantially for the year. Stable operations provided record production
levels at all sites during 2006 and good market conditions contributed to higher prices and
volumes, partly offset by increased raw materials costs as a result of high energy prices. Results
for 2006 included NOK 380 million relating to unrealized gains on internal power derivative
contracts. Effects relating to such contracts were included in Corporate activities and elimination
in earlier years. The decline in operating income in 2005, compared with 2004 resulted from higher
raw material costs due to increased oil prices and high costs related to external purchases of
ethylene during a major planned maintenance shutdown of the Noretyl ethylene cracker (50 percent
Hydro investee).
Adjusted EBITDA amounted to NOK 1,542 million in 2006, compared with NOK 564 million in 2005 and
NOK 774 million in 2004. Results from non-consolidated investees amounted to NOK 53 million in
2006, a decrease of NOK 84 million compared to 2005. The decrease was mainly due to weaker results
in Qatar Vinyl Company and to a write-down of the value of our 26.2 percent interest in CIRES, a
PVC resin and compound manufacturer in Portugal, by NOK 43 million.
In 2006, we completed the conversion of the diaphragm chlorine plant located in Rafnes, Norway, to
new membrane technology. The project was completed on time and below budget. Together with the new
chlorine plant at Rafnes completed in 2005, this contributed to an increase in production of
caustic soda of 100,000 mt in 2006, compared with 2005.
Hydro Information Memorandum
44
6.4.6.2 Other
Other had operating income of NOK 248 million for the year, compared with an operating loss of
NOK 71 million in 2005 and operating income of NOK 58 million in 2004. The operating loss for 2005
included insurance costs of approximately NOK 240 million, compared with costs of approximately NOK
230 million in 2004. 2005 also included approximately NOK 90 million of pension charges relating to
Hydros interest in Biomar.
Adjusted EBITDA for other amounted to NOK 551 million, compared with NOK 1,316 million in 2005 and
NOK 589 million in 2004. Adjusted EBITDA for 2005 included a gain on the sale of Hydros interest
in Biomar amounting to NOK 693 million and a gain of NOK 233 million relating to the sale of its
remaining interest in Pronova Biocare. In 2004, Hydro recognized a gain of NOK 110 million on the
sale of Pronova Biocare.
6.5 Financial information
6.5.1 Hydro After Demerger basis for presentation
Background description of proposed transaction
The Board of Directors of Norsk Hydro ASA (Hydro) and the Board of Directors of Statoil ASA
(Statoil) have agreed to a proposed merger of Hydros petroleum activities (Hydro Petroleum) with
Statoil. The merger presupposes a demerger of Norsk Hydro ASA, the parent company. As a part of the
merger, a transfer will also take place of the ownership interests in a number of companies to be
included in the merged companys corporate structure, as well as a transfer of the ownership
interests in certain other partly owned companies.
The remaining part of the parent company, Norsk Hydro ASA, and the ownership interests in the
companies not included in the merger will be part of the Hydro Groups continued operations (Hydro
After Demerger).
Upon the execution of the merger, all assets, rights and obligations included in Hydro Petroleum
will be transferred to Statoil. In accordance with the Merger Plan, all cash and short-term
investments held by the parent company are allocated to Hydro After Demerger. All debenture loans
will be transferred to Hydro Petroleum. To establish the agreed level of NOK 1 billion in net
interest-bearing debt as of the 1 January 2007 financial effective date, a demerger receivable of
NOK 18,196 million payable by Hydro After Demerger to Hydro Petroleum will be established as of the
financial effective date.
The transfer takes place by reducing the share capital of Hydro by reducing the par value of each
share, while increasing the share capital of Statoil by issuing new shares as consideration to
Hydros shareholders. This will result in the Hydro shareholders receiving 0.8622 shares in the
merged company for each share owned in Hydro. Consideration in the form of shares shall not be
issued for Hydros own shares.
The financial effective date of the merger shall be 1 January 2007.
Overview
The combined financial information presented in this document consists of the Hydro After Demerger
combined income statements for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 31 December 2005 and the
combined balance sheets as of 31 December 2006 and 2005. For information purposes only, this
document also includes a presentation of the split between Hydro After Demerger and Hydro Petroleum
of the Hydro consolidated income statements for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 2005 and the
consolidated balance sheets as of 31 December 2006 and 2005.
The Hydro After Demerger combined income statements and combined balance sheets, and the Hydro
Petroleum demerger carve-out combined income statements and combined balance sheets are prepared
using the historical results of operations and historical basis of the assets and liabilities of
Hydro After Demerger and Hydro Petroleum, respectively. Additionally, this financial information
reflects the Merger Plan, in that the debenture loan balance is allocated to Hydro Petroleum (with
the associated income statement adjustments for interest and foreign currency exchange effects) and
the merger receivable of NOK 18,196 million is included in the respective combined balance sheets.
The Hydro Petroleum demerger carve-out combined condensed income statements and condensed balance
sheets presented in this document differ from the Hydro Petroleum carve-out combined financial
statements as presented in Statoils Prospectus, in respect to the two items mentioned above, namely the
treatment of the loan balance and the merger receivable.
45
Hydro Information Memorandum
The Hydro Petroleum demerger carve-out combined income statements and combined balance sheets have
been derived from the accounts and records of the Hydro Petroleum businesses and operations as
included in Hydros US GAAP consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2006
and 31 December 2005. To the extent items have been allocated, the principles and reasons for such
allocations are described below.
The Hydro Petroleum demerger carve-out financial information includes the historical operations,
assets and liabilities of Hydro Petroleum. The operations and companies of Hydro Petroleum are not
identical with the operations reported as Oil & Energy in Hydros segment reporting. Where
significant assets or operations previously reported as part of other segments are included in
Hydro Petroleum, these operations are included in the demerger carve-out combined financial
statements. Hydro IS Partner (IS Partner), previously reported as part of Other Businesses, is
included in Hydro Petroleum. Similarly, assets and operations previously reported as part of Oil &
Energy not included in Hydro Petroleum are excluded from the demerger carve-out combined financial
statements. The Power activities, previously reported as part of Energy and Oil Marketing within
Oil & Energy, are excluded from Hydro Petroleum. Previously unallocated assets, liabilities,
expenses and income reported as part of Corporate and eliminations have been allocated between
Hydro Petroleum and Hydro After Demerger as described below.
The Hydro After Demerger combined income statements and combined balance sheets have been derived
from Hydros US GAAP consolidated financial statements for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 31
December 2005. The Hydro After Demerger figures represent the remaining assets, liabilities, equity
and result after carving-out the Hydro Petroleum demerger carve-out financial information.
Management believes the assumptions underlying the Hydro After Demerger combined income statements
and combined balance sheets are reasonable. However, the combined income statements and combined
balance sheets as presented may not reflect what the results of operations and financial position
would have been had Hydro After Demerger been a stand-alone company during the periods presented,
and may not be indicative of future performance.
As a result of rounding adjustments, the figures in one or more columns included in the combined
income statements and combined balance sheets may not add up to the total of that column.
General and overhead costs
The majority of costs originate in the individual business units. Costs related to shared services
and corporate services, such as legal, IS/IT, human resources services and other, are charged to
units based on services delivered in each period. General corporate overhead has been allocated
between Hydro Petroleum and Hydro After Demerger. These
costs are mainly related to general management, governance functions, accounting and investor
relations, cash management, and finance functions. The Hydro After Demerger general and overhead
cost is the Hydro consolidated general and overhead cost less the Hydro Petroleum demerger
carve-out general and overhead cost. General and overhead costs are allocated based on the ratio of
net values based on the assumption that previously unallocated costs primarily are related to
holding functions and shareholder related activities, and as such cannot be related to activities
in the businesses within the group. Management believes that allocation based on the relative value
provides a reasonable allocation of these costs and expenses.
Cash and cash equivalents
Hydro uses a centralized approach to cash management. As a result, neither the Hydro After Demerger
operations, nor the Hydro Petroleum operations, have had separate funds. Cash and cash equivalents
in Hydros consolidated financial statements represent primarily cash held by the parent company.
In the demerger carve-out combined balance sheets, cash balances held by subsidiaries of Hydro
Petroleum are included in the demerger carve-out combined balance sheets for Hydro Petroleum. No
cash held by the parent company has been allocated to Hydro Petroleum. The Hydro After Demerger
cash balance is the Hydro consolidated cash balance less the Hydro Petroleum demerger carve-out
cash balance.
Hydro Information Memorandum
46
Loans
Hydro uses a centralized approach to financing of its operations. Therefore, neither the Hydro
After Demerger operations, nor the Hydro Petroleum operations have had separate external financing,
per se. Hydros debt has been allocated to Hydro Petroleum based on the Merger Plan.
Financial income and expense
Interest expense and currency gains and losses represent the actual cost of Hydro After Demergers
debt. Currency exposure is managed centrally based on Hydros total exposure. To the extent
currency gains and losses are directly attributable to the units operating activities, the gains
and losses are reported as part of the results of the relevant unit. Managements review of the
currency exposure in the group shows that the currency exposure is mainly driven by the currencies
in which revenue and significant costs are denominated or determined in. Hydro Petroleum and Hydro
After Demerger have sales and expenses in foreign currencies with similar patterns, where USD and
EUR are the main transaction currencies. Management believes that an allocation key derived from
revenues best represent the currency exposures within Hydros businesses.
Pension costs
All Norwegian employees participate in a combined pension plan. The actual service cost,
liabilities and assets associated with Hydro After Demerger employees and retired plan members are
included in the combined financial information.
Income taxes
Significant effects of tax consolidation of Hydro After Demergers taxable income in the various
countries with the taxable income of the remaining part of Hydro have been eliminated to arrive at
an income tax expense as if separate tax returns had been filed for previous periods. Income tax
expense for Hydro After Demerger has been calculated in the combined income statements in order to
give an estimate of what the tax expense would have been if Hydro After Demerger was a separate
company.
However, the tax expense in the Hydro After Demerger combined income statements may not reflect
what the tax expense would have been had Hydro After Demerger been a stand-alone company during the
period presented.
Internal transactions and contracts
Contracts between entities within Hydro Petroleum and Hydro After Demerger have been recognized as
if they were contracts with unrelated parties at arms length. This includes
sales and purchases of goods and services, and certain derivative instruments, primarily with
currency and electricity underlying. Receivables and payables with Hydro Petroleum as counterparty
are separately classified in the combined balance sheets, and represent trade receivables and
payables and items related to capital transfers between legal entities. Such receivables and
payables are netted to the extent they are of a financial nature.
6.5.2 Hydro After Demerger financial information
The Hydro After Demerger combined income statements for the years ended 31 December 2006 and
2005, as well as the Hydro After Demerger combined balance sheets as of 31 December 2006 and 2005,
are given below.
47
Hydro Information Memorandum
HYDRO AFTER DEMERGER
COMBINED INCOME STATEMENTS (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended 31 December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in NOK million (except per share amounts) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
102,632 |
|
|
|
92,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and energy costs |
|
|
70,304 |
|
|
|
62,207 |
|
Payroll and related costs |
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
13,095 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
3,975 |
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,759 |
|
|
|
7,142 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
94,825 |
|
|
|
87,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
7,808 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated investees |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Financial income (expense), net |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes and minority interest |
|
|
8,714 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2,186 |
) |
|
|
(1,397 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
6,327 |
|
|
|
4,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
6,493 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,493 |
|
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles 1) |
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations 1) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles 1) |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share 1) |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 2) (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,493 |
|
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
Net investment hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
Net foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
6,511 |
|
|
|
4,241 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Previously reported earnings per share and total number of outstanding shares have been
adjusted to reflect the 5-for-1 stock split effective 10 May 2006. |
|
|
2) |
|
Changes in shareholders equity include net income together with other changes not
related to investments by and distribution to shareholders. |
Hydro
Information Memorandum
48
HYDRO AFTER DEMERGER
COMBINED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 December |
Amounts in NOK million, except outstanding shares |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
15,020 |
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of NOK 685 and NOK 638 |
|
|
14,328 |
|
|
|
12,162 |
|
Receivable Hydro Petroleum |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
14,220 |
|
|
|
12,952 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
5,364 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
57,351 |
|
|
|
46,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-consolidated investees |
|
|
8,780 |
|
|
|
8,601 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment losses |
|
|
31,158 |
|
|
|
34,623 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
Prepaid pension, investments and other non-current assets |
|
|
6,354 |
|
|
|
8,633 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Non-current assets held for sale |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
50,661 |
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
108,012 |
|
|
|
101,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans and other interest-bearing short-term debt |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Current liabilities Hydro Petroleum |
|
|
19,227 |
|
|
|
20,293 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
20,477 |
|
|
|
17,418 |
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
Current liabilities in disposal group |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
43,742 |
|
|
|
41,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Accured pension liabilities |
|
|
8,895 |
|
|
|
7,666 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
3,771 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Long-term liability in disposal group |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
14,374 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority shareholders interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other shareholders equity |
|
|
54,232 |
|
|
|
45,429 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
49,190 |
|
|
|
43,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
108,012 |
|
|
|
101,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of outstanding shares, millions 1) |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Nominal value per share 1) |
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Previously reported nominal value per share and total number of outstanding shares have
been adjusted to reflect the 5-for-1 stock split effective 10 May 2006. |
49
Hydro Information Memorandum
6.5.3 |
|
Independent accountants report for Hydro After Demerger |
To the Shareholders of Norsk Hydro ASA
We have examined the combined balance sheets of Hydro After Demerger as of 31 December 2006 and
2005, and the related combined statements of income and combined statements of comprehensive income
for the years then ended. This financial information has been prepared for the purpose of showing
the financial effect on Norsk Hydro ASA and subsidiaries after the demerger of its petroleum
activities which are to be merged with Statoil ASA. The historical consolidated financial
statements of Norsk Hydro ASA and subsidiaries prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) were audited by us (on which we have
issued our report dated 12 March 2007 and 7 March 2006, respectively). We have examined the
allocation adjustments made to the historical US GAAP consolidated financial information of Norsk
Hydro ASA and subsidiaries reflecting the demerger of Norsk Hydro ASAs petroleum activities in
accordance with the Merger Plan between Norsk Hydro ASA and Statoil ASA. The allocation adjustments
are based upon managements assumptions described in Hydro After Demerger basis for presentation
in section 6.5.1 in the Information Memorandum. Management is responsible for such assumptions and
allocation adjustments reflected in the financial information for Hydro After Demerger. Management
is also responsible for the Hydro After Demerger financial information. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the allocation adjustments to the historical US GAAP consolidated financial
information based on our examination.
We conducted our examination in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements
3000 and accordingly, included such procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, managements assumptions provide a reasonable basis for presenting the significant
effects directly attributable to the above-mentioned proposed demerger, the related allocation
adjustments give appropriate effect to those assumptions, and are properly reflected in the Hydro
After Demerger financial information as of 31 December 2006 and 2005 and for the years then ended,
as presented in section 6.5.2 of the Information Memorandum.
Oslo, Norway, 20 March 2007
Deloitte AS
/s/ Aase Aa. Lundgaard
State Authorized Public Accountant (Norway)
6.5.4 |
|
Name and address of Hydros auditors for the last three years |
Deloitte AS
Karenslyst allè 20
P.O. Box 347 Skøyen
NO-0213 Oslo
Norway
6.5.5 |
|
Other financial information |
After the Demerger, management believes that cash from continuing operations, together with liquid
holdings and available credit facilities, will be more than sufficient to meet anticipated capital
expenditures, operational requirements, dividends and debt repayments in the second half of 2007
and the first half of 2008.
Presentation of the condensed income statements for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 2005 and
the condensed balance sheets as of 31 December 2006 and 2005 for Hydro Consolidated, Hydro
Petroleum Demerger Carve-out Combined and Hydro After Demerger Combined is made for information
purposes only. The following financial information gives the Hydro financial information split
between Hydro Petroleum and Hydro After Demerger, in accordance with the demerger carve-out
principles as described in Hydro After Demerger basis for presentation.
Hydro Information Memorandum
50
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
Year ended 31.12.2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demerger |
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carve-out |
|
|
After Demerger |
|
NOK Million, except per share information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Adjustments 1) |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
196,234 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
95,138 |
|
|
|
102,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
22,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,202 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
Other operating costs |
|
|
121,837 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
32,519 |
|
|
|
90,862 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
52,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,417 |
|
|
|
7,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated investees |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Interest income and expense, net |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax and minority interest |
|
|
55,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,310 |
|
|
|
8,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(37,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,412 |
) |
|
|
(2,186 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
17,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,898 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,898 |
|
|
|
6,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
|
13.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
Average number of outstanding shares, million |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Adjustments constitutes operating revenues from sales from Hydro Petroleum to Hydro After Demerger
and from Hydro After Demerger to Hydro Petroleum during the year. |
51
Hydro Information Memorandum
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
31.12.2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demerger |
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carve-out |
|
|
After Demerger |
|
NOK Million, except per share information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Adjustments 1) |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
15,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15,020 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
42,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,551 |
|
|
|
20,181 |
|
Receivable Hydro Petroleum / Hydro After Demerger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
19,172 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
16,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
14,220 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
82,131 |
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
44,153 |
|
|
|
57,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
124,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,818 |
|
|
|
31,158 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
24,317 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
8,372 |
|
|
|
16,934 |
|
Non-current assets held for sale |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
151,862 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
102,190 |
|
|
|
50,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
233,993 |
|
|
|
20,362 |
|
|
|
146,343 |
|
|
|
108,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans and other interest bearing short-term debt |
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Payable Hydro Petroleum / Hydro After Demerger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
19,227 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
56,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,414 |
|
|
|
21,269 |
|
Current liabilities in disposal groups |
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
61,076 |
|
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
36,705 |
|
|
|
43,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
19,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,252 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
28,517 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
16,738 |
|
|
|
12,654 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
27,307 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
26,340 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
Long-term
liabilities in disposal groups |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
75,716 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
62,330 |
|
|
|
14,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority shareholders interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
96,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,306 |
|
|
|
49,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
233,993 |
|
|
|
20,361 |
|
|
|
146,343 |
|
|
|
108,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of outstanding shares, millions 2) |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
Nominal value per share 2) |
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Adjustments constitutes receivables and payables between Hydro Petroleum and Hydro
After Demerger. The main element is the agreed demerger receivable of NOK 18,196 million. |
|
|
2) |
|
Previously reported nominal value per share and total number of shares have been
adjusted to reflect the 5-for-1 stock split effective 10 May 2006. |
Hydro Information Memorandum
52
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
Year ended 31.12.2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demerger |
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carve-out |
|
|
After Demerger |
|
NOK Million, except per share information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Adjustments 1) |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
171,231 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
80,806 |
|
|
|
92,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
15,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,518 |
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
Other operating costs |
|
|
109,242 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
28,474 |
|
|
|
82,443 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
46,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,814 |
|
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of non-consolidated investees |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Interest income and expense, net |
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,422 |
) |
|
|
533 |
|
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
Income before tax and minority interest |
|
|
45,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,560 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(30,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,874 |
) |
|
|
(1,397 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
15,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,686 |
|
|
|
4,857 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles |
|
|
15,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,686 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
Net income |
|
|
15,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,686 |
|
|
|
4,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
|
12.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
12.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Average number of outstanding shares, million |
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Adjustments constitutes operating revenues from sales from
Hydro Petroleum to Hydro After Demerger and from Hydro After Demerger to Hydro Petroleum during the year. |
53
Hydro Information Memorandum
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)
31.12.2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demerger |
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
Hydro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carve-out |
|
|
After Demerger |
|
NOK Million, except per share information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Adjustments 1) |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
10,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
10,266 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
41,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,338 |
|
|
|
19,073 |
|
Receivable Hydro Petroleum / Hydro After Demerger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
20,290 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
14,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
12,952 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
70,293 |
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
44,431 |
|
|
|
46,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation, deplation and amortization |
|
|
128,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,568 |
|
|
|
34,623 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
28,711 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
9,307 |
|
|
|
19,873 |
|
Non-current assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
156,902 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
102,874 |
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
227,194 |
|
|
|
21,537 |
|
|
|
147,306 |
|
|
|
101,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans
and other interest bearing short-term debt |
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
Current
portion of long-term debt |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
Payable Hydro Petroleum / Hydro After Demerger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
20,293 |
|
Other
current liabilities |
|
|
48,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,918 |
|
|
|
18,302 |
|
Current liabilities in disposal groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
53,256 |
|
|
|
21,069 |
|
|
|
32,868 |
|
|
|
41,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
21,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,665 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
22,363 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
|
|
11,437 |
|
Deferred tax
liabilities |
|
|
33,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,613 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Long-term
liabilities in disposal groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
long-term liabilities |
|
|
77,462 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
62,672 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
shareholders interest in consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
equity |
|
|
95,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,765 |
|
|
|
43,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
227,195 |
|
|
|
21,537 |
|
|
|
147,306 |
|
|
|
101,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number
of outstanding shares, millions 2) |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Nominal
value per share 2) |
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
1) |
|
Adjustments constitutes receivables and payables between
Hydro Petroleum and Hydro After
Demerger. The main element is the agreed demerger receivable of NOK 18,196 million.
|
|
|
2) |
|
Previously reported nominal value per share and total number of shares have been
adjusted to reflect the 5-for-1 stock split effective 10 May 2006. |
Hydro Information Memorandum
54
6.6 Organization, Board of Directors and management
6.6.1 Legal form, address and business register number
Norsk Hydro ASA is a public limited company organized under Norwegian law. Our business
register number is NO. 914 778 271. Hydro is subject to the provisions of the Norwegian act
relating to public limited liability companies (i.e., the Norwegian Public Limited Companies Act).
Our principal executive offices are located at Drammensveien 264, Vækerø, N-0240 Oslo, Norway;
telephone number: 47-22-53-81-00. Hydros internet site is
www.hydro.com.
6.6.2 Legal structure
Norsk Hydro ASA will continue to be the ultimate parent company of the Hydro group after the
Demerger. Hydro has three significant subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. They are Norsk
Hydro Produksjon AS and Hydro Aluminium AS, both incorporated in Norway, and Hydro Aluminium
Deutschland GmbH, which is incorporated in Germany.
Following the Demerger, Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS will primarily
be comprised of the hydroelectric
power plants, located in Telemark and Røldal/Suldal, and associated trading activities.
55
Hydro Information Memorandum
6.6.3 Management
As of 31 December 2006, the Hydro Corporate Management Board (CMB) consisted of seven
individuals. In the period 1 January 2007 through the date
of this document, press releases have been issued
containing information related to a resignation from or appointments to the CMB.
Hilde Aasheim stepped down from the CMB on 16 January 2007 to concentrate on leading the planning
of the integration of Hydro Petroleums activities with Statoil. Effective from the completion of
the Merger, Tore Torvund will step down from the Hydro Corporate Management Board, leaving Hydro to
join the Merged Company as a member of corporate management.
On 8
February 2007 it was announced that Tom Røtjer and Jørgen C. Arentz Rostrup will be appointed
as members of Hydros Corporate Management Board, with responsibilities for Projects and Power,
respectively. Their appointments will take effect following completion of the Merger of Hydro
Petroleum with Statoil.
On 29 March 2007 it was announced that Odd Ivar Biller, general counsel of Hydro, has been
appointed executive vice
president in charge of legal affairs with responsibility for
legal affairs and corporate social responsibility. He joined
Hydros Corporate Management Board effective 1 April 2007.
On 13 April 2007 it was announced that Anne Harris was appointed executive vice president of
Human Resources and
Organizational Development. She will join Hydros Corporate Management Board effective 1 June.
The following table lists the members of the Hydro After Demerger Corporate Management Board, their
place of residence and position, to the extent of the information known as of the date of this
document.
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate management Board |
|
Place of Residence |
Position |
Eivind Reiten
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
John Ove Ottestad
|
|
Lier, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Svein Richard
Brandtzæg 1)
|
|
Karmsund, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Aluminium
Products |
Torstein
Dale Sjøtveit 2)
|
|
Baerum, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Aluminium Metal |
Cecilie DitlevSimonsen3)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Communication and Reputation Management |
Tom
Røtjer 4)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Projects |
Jørgen C. Arentz
Rostrup 5)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Power |
Odd Ivar Biller
6)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Legal Affairs |
Anne Harris
7)
|
|
Drammen, Norway
|
|
Executive Vice President Human Resources
and Organizational Development |
|
1) |
|
Svein Richard Brandtzæg joined the Corporate Management Board 1 February 2006. |
|
|
2) |
|
Torstein Dale Sjøtveit joined the Corporate Management Board 1 April 2006. |
|
|
3) |
|
Cecilie DitlevSimonsen joined the Corporate Management Board 5 December 2006. |
|
|
4) |
|
Tom Røtjer was appointed to the Corporate Management Board on
8 February 2007, with the appointment to take effect upon completion of the Demerger. |
|
|
5) |
|
Jørgen C. Arentz Rostrup was appointed to the Corporate
Management Board on 8 February 2007, with the appointment to take effect upon completion of the Demerger. |
|
|
6) |
|
Odd Ivar Biller was appointed to the Corporate Management Board 29 March 2007, with the appointment to take effect 1 April 2007. |
|
|
7) |
|
Anne Harris was appointed to the Corporate Management Board 13 April 2007. The appointment will be effective 1 June 2007. |
Members of the Corporate Management Board have been granted share appreciation rights (SARs) during
the period 2002-2006. SAR activity during 2006, as well as the number and intrinsic value of SARs
outstanding as of year-end 2006 and share ownership as of 31 December 2006 for the members of the
Hydro After Demerger Corporate Management Board are given in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARs |
|
|
SARs |
|
|
SARs |
|
|
Price of SARs |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
SARs |
|
|
SARs Granted |
|
|
Vested in |
|
|
Exercised in |
|
|
Outstanding in |
|
|
outstanding as |
|
|
of outstanding |
|
|
shares held |
|
Corporate Management Board |
|
31.12.2005 |
|
|
01.07.2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
31.12.2006 |
|
|
of 31.12.2006 |
|
|
options 1) |
|
|
31.12.2006 2) |
|
|
Eivind Reiten |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
128.67 |
|
|
|
15,234,300 |
|
|
|
68,395 |
|
John Ove Ottestad |
|
|
167,620 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
32,620 |
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
118.82 |
|
|
|
13,816,300 |
|
|
|
41,380 |
|
Svein
Richard Brandtzæg 3) |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
148.15 |
|
|
|
3,854,500 |
|
|
|
8,790 |
|
Torstein
Dale Sjøtveit 4) |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
148.15 |
|
|
|
3,854,500 |
|
|
|
6,990 |
|
Cecilie
Ditlev-Simonsen
5) |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
131.53 |
|
|
|
2,323,750 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
Tom
Røtjer
6) |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
131.53 |
|
|
|
3,253,250 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
Jørgen C. Arentz Rostrup 7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
175.00 |
|
|
|
323,750 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Odd Ivar
Biller 8) |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
131.53 |
|
|
|
2,790,000 |
|
|
|
9,545 |
|
Anne Harris
9) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
131.53 |
|
|
|
2,325,000 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Share price 31 December 2006 less exercise price multiplied by the number of SARs outstanding
as of year-end. |
|
|
2) |
|
Number of shares held includes related party share holdings as of 31 December 2006, in
addition to the shares held directly by the corporate management board member. |
|
|
3) |
|
Svein Richard Brandtzæg joined the Corporate Management Board 1 February 2006. |
|
|
4) |
|
Torstein Dale Sjøtveit joined the Corporate Management Board 1 April 2006. |
|
|
5) |
|
Cecilie Ditlev-Simonsen joined the Corporate Management Board 5 December 2006. |
|
|
6) |
|
Tom Røtjer was
appointed to the Corporate Management Board 8 February 2007, with the
appointment to take effect upon completion of the Demerger. |
|
|
7) |
|
Jørgen C.
Arentz Rostrup was appointed to the Corporate Management Board 8 February 2007,
with the appointment to take effect upon completion of the Demerger. |
|
|
8) |
|
Odd Ivar Biller was appointed to the Corporate Management Board 29 March 2007, with the appointment to take effect 1 April 2007. |
|
|
9) |
|
Anne Harris was appointed to the Corporate Management Board 13 April 2007. The appointment will be effective 1 June 2007. |
Presentation
of the Corporate Management Board
Eivind Reiten succeeded Egil Myklebust as President and Chief Executive Officer of Hydro,
effective from 2 May 2001. From 1999 to the date of his appointment as President and CEO, Reiten
served as Executive Vice President for Hydros Light Metals business area. From 1996 to 1998, he
served as President of Hydro Aluminium Metal Products. From 1992 to 1996, he served as President of
Hydros Refining and Marketing Division. From 1991 to 1992, he served as Senior Vice President,
Special Projects. From 1988 to 1990, he served as President of the Energy Division, following a
two-year period as manager, and later Vice President for Hydro Agri. From 1990 to 1991, he had the
position of Minister of Petroleum and Energy in the Norwegian government. During the seven-year
period from 1979 to 1986, Reiten held several governmental posts including Junior Executive Officer
in the Ministry of Fisheries and Secretary to the Center Partys Parliamentary Group and State
Secretary, Ministry of Finance and Minister of Fisheries. Reiten graduated from the University of
Oslo in 1978 with a degree in economics.
John Ove Ottestad has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 1 March
2002. Employed at Hydro since 1975, Ottestad has held numerous positions. Ottestad served as Senior
Vice President for Mergers and Acquisitions from 1999 to 2002, as President of Hydros Refining and
Marketing Division from 1996 to 1999, as President of Hydros Magnesium Division from 1988 to 1996,
and as President of Hydro Innovation from 1985 to 1987. Between 1975 and 1985, Ottestad served as
Director for Corporate Strategic Planning, as a manager in Corporate Financial Planning and as an
engineer in the Oil and Gas Division. Ottestad also served two years as an EDP scientist with the
Norwegian Research Foundation, SINTEF. Ottestad graduated from the Norwegian Institute of
Technology in 1973 with a masters degree in physics.
Svein
Richard Brandtzæg was appointed Executive Vice President responsible for Aluminium Products
in 2006. Brandtzæg was employed by ÅSV in 1986 when the company was acquired by Hydro and held a
number of management positions until becoming head of Hydros magnesium business in 2000. During
the period 2002-2003 he was President of Metal Products. From 2003 onwards he was Sector President
for Rolled Products. Brandtzæg was born in 1957 and holds a doctorate from the Norwegian Institute
of Technology. He is also a business graduate.
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
Torstein Dale Sjøtveit was appointed Executive Vice President responsible for Aluminium Metal in
2006. He has held a wide range of positions in Hydro since 1981. These include total quality
management, planning and finance, project management and international exploration. From 1996 to
2001 he was Head of Hydros West African Business Unit,
based in Angola. Between 2001 and 2003 he was President of Exploration and Development Norway. He
became President, Hydro Other Businesses, in 2003. He was appointed Sector President of Primary
Metal in 2005. Sjøtveit holds a degree in civil engineering from the Stavanger School of
Engineering.
Cecilie Ditlev-Simonsen was appointed Executive Vice President responsible for Communication and
Reputation Management in 2006. She joined Hydro as Senior Vice President of Corporate Communication
in 2002. She has previously worked as Managing Consultant in the executive search firm
Futurestep/Korn Ferry International and Executive Vice President for the Norwegian State Railways.
Ditlev-Simonsen has also been communication manager for IBM Norway and for IBM Nordic. She has also
worked as a consultant with Norwegian communication agencies and as a political adviser to the
Executive Board of the City of Oslo. Ditlev-Simonsen was an elected member of the Oslo City Council
from 1992-1995. She worked for several US newspapers during and after studying journalism at the
Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University, USA.
Tom Røtjer will be appointed Executive Vice President Projects, to take effect upon completion of
the Merger. He is currently project director for the Ormen Lange gas field development. As a member
of the Corporate Management Board, he will be responsible for Hydros projects in Norway and
abroad, including the planned Qatalum aluminium project in Qatar. Røtjer has been involved in most
of Hydros development projects since he joined the company in 1980 and headed Hydros technology
and project sector for nearly six years. He will continue to head the Ormen Lange project until the
field comes onstream, scheduled for October 2007. Røtjer holds an engineering degree from the
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in Trondheim.
Jørgen C. Arentz Rostrup will be appointed Executive Vice President Power, to take effect upon
completion of the Merger. He will manage Hydros power production facilities, including solar
energy activities. His previous position in Hydro was as head of Oil & Energy Markets, in charge of
oil, gas and power sales. Since joining Hydro in 1991, he has held a number of management positions
in energy, finance and international business development in Norway, the United States and
Singapore. Rostrup holds a Masters degree from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business
Administration (NHH) in Bergen.
Odd Ivar Biller was appointed Executive Vice President in charge of legal affairs with
effect from 1 April 2007. He has
worked in Norsk Hydro since 1980, the past 15 years as legal director and eight years as head
of legal functions in
Hydros oil and gas division. He was earlier Head of Office International Taxation at the
Norwegian Finance Ministrys tax
law department.
Anne Harris has been appointed Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Organizational Development,
effective from 1 June 2007. She has held a number of management positions in Hydro since she joined the company in
2001, most recently as senior vice president of Corporate Financial Reporting and Performance. She has previously
worked as administration and personnel manager for Total Norge. Harris holds a Bachelors degree from the Norwegian
School of Management (BI).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
6.6.4 Board of Directors
Hydros Board of Directors consists of nine individuals, as indicated in the table below. Board members do not participate
in the Hydro share appreciation right grants.
On 2 May 2007 it was announced that Elisabeth Grieg and Kurt Anker Nielsen was proposed as Board members of
StatoilHydro ASA. As a consequence they are expected to step down from the Hydro Board of Directors.
On 24 May 2007 is was announced that Ragnar Fritsvold has been elected member of Hydros Board of Directors.
Fritsvold, chief engineer in Hydro, replaces Terje Friestad as one of the Boards three employee representatives.
The following table lists the members of the Board of Directors, their place of residence, position
and board committee assignments, if applicable, and share ownership as of 31 December 2006. Share
ownership includes shares owned directly and shares owned by related parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Directors |
|
Place of Residence |
|
Position |
|
Share Ownership |
|
Jan
Reinàs
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Chairperson, Compensation Committee
|
|
|
Elisabeth Grieg
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Deputy Chairperson, Audit Committee |
|
|
30,400 |
Håkan Mogren
|
|
Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
Director, Compensation Committee
|
|
|
Kurt Anker Nielsen
|
|
Copenhagen, Denmark
|
|
Director, Audit Committee
|
|
|
Grete
Faremo 1)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Lena
Olving 1)
|
|
Hjo, Sweden
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Geir Nilsen 2)
|
|
Porsgrunn, Norway
|
|
Director
|
|
|
465 |
Terje
Friestad 2) 3)
|
|
Skudeneshavn, Norway
|
|
Director, Audit Committee
|
|
|
1,370 |
Sten Roar Martinsen 2)
|
|
Kopervik, Norway
|
|
Director
|
|
|
75 |
Ragnar
Fritsvold 2)
4)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
Director
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Board member as of 19 May 2006. |
|
2) |
|
Employee representative on the board elected by the employees in accordance with the Norwegian
Public Limited Companies Act. |
|
3) |
|
Stepped down from the Board of Directors on 16 May 2007. |
|
4) |
|
Board member as of 16 May 2007. Shareholding is per 24 May 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
6.6.5 Corporate
Assembly
Members of the Corporate Assembly, their place of residence and share ownership are listed in the table below as if 31
December 2006. The shareholdings for the new members and deputy members are as of 24 May 2007. Total Corporate
Assembly shareholdings represent less than 1 percent of the total Hydro shares outstanding as of 31 December 2006.
Members of the Corporate Assembly do not have any share appreciation rights or stock options granted by Hydro. On 16
May 2007 it was announced that Roger Oterholt, Rune Strande and Sven Edin would step down from the Corporate
Assembly. On the same date Michael Hall and Per Martin Labråthen were elected new members of the Corporate
Assembly. Arne Kjølberg, Anne Madsen, Tor Egil Skulstad, Ove Ellefsen, Øystein Bråthen, Merete Jonas, Odd Arne
Fodnes and Bente Østlyngen were elected new deputy members of the Corporate Assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Assembly |
|
Place of Residence |
|
Share
Ownership 1) |
|
|
Svein Steen Thomassen (Chairperson)
|
|
Bergen, Norway
|
|
|
500 |
Siri Teigum (Deputy Chairperson)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
Sven
Edin 4)
|
|
Porsgrunn, Norway
|
|
|
1,195 |
Billy Fredagsvik
|
|
Høyanger, Norway
|
|
|
265 |
Anne-Margrethe
Firing 2)
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
5,820 |
Aase Gudding Gresvig
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
Michael
Hall 3)
|
|
Raufoss, Norway
|
|
61 |
Westye Høegh
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
64,000 |
Idar Kreutzer
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
|
Kjell Kvinge
|
|
Kolsås, Norway
|
|
|
685 |
Per
Martin Labråthen 3)
|
|
Bergen, Norway
|
|
|
136 |
Dag Harald Madsen
|
|
Heistad, Norway
|
|
|
190 |
Roger
Oterholt 4)
|
|
Skien, Norway
|
|
|
75 |
Anne Merete Steensland
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
121,360 |
Rune
Strande 4)
|
|
Bøverbru, Norway
|
|
|
80 |
Sten-Arthur
Sælør
|
|
Østerås, Norway
|
|
|
Lars Tronsgaard
|
|
Drammen, Norway
|
|
|
Karen
Helene Ulltveit-Moe
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
55.000 |
Terje Venold 2)
|
|
Stabekk, Norway
|
|
|
200 |
Svein Aaser
|
|
Drøbak, Norway
|
|
|
9,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
Deputy Assembly |
|
Place of Residence |
|
Ownership 1) |
|
Nils Roar Brevik
|
|
Orkanger, Norway
|
|
|
80 |
Øystein
Bråthen 3) |
|
Porsgrunn, Norway |
|
|
1,676 |
Ove Ellefsen 3) |
|
Karmøy, Norway |
|
|
576 |
Odd Arne Fodnes 3) |
|
Årdal, Norway |
|
|
361 |
Tore Amund Fredriksen
|
|
Porsgrunn, Norway
|
|
|
645 |
Erik Garaas
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
Sónia F.T. Gjesdal
|
|
Oslo, Norway
|
|
|
660 |
Merete Jonas 3) |
|
Porsgrunn, Norway |
|
|
766 |
Arne Kjølberg 3) |
|
Bergen, Norway |
|
|
1,351 |
Anne Madsen 3) |
|
Porsgrunn, Norway |
|
|
2,516 |
Line Melkild
|
|
Sunndalsøra,
Norway
|
|
|
140 |
Bjørn Nedreaas
|
|
Åkerhamn, Norway
|
|
|
270 |
Wolfgang Ruch
|
|
Manching, Germany
|
|
|
875 |
Tor Egil Skulstad 3) |
|
Magnor, Norway |
|
|
25 |
Unni Steinsmo
|
|
Trondheim, Norway
|
|
|
Gunvor Ulstein
|
|
Ulsteinvik, Norway
|
|
|
Bente Østlyngen 3) |
|
Oslo Norway |
|
|
241 |
Bjørn
Øvstetun
|
|
Øvre
Årdal, Norway
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Number of shares includes any related party shareholdings in addition to the shares
held directly by the Corporate Assembly or Deputy Assembly member. |
|
2) |
|
Member of the Corporate Assembly from 10 May 2006. |
|
3) |
|
Member of the Corporate Assembly from 16 May 2007. Shareholding is per 24 May 2007.
|
|
4) |
|
Stepped down from the Corporate Assembly on 16 May 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
6.6.6 Related party transactions
Major Shareholders
Major shareholders as of 31 December 2006 are listed below. There is no direct impact expected on
major shareholders ownership as a result of the Demerger.
Hydros
20 largest shareholders, 31 December 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Ownership |
Shareholder |
|
Share |
|
interest |
|
Norwegian State
|
|
|
563,773,605 |
|
|
|
43.82 |
% |
Morgan Guaranty Trust (ADR)
|
|
|
65,978,114 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
% |
Hydro
|
|
|
60,279,570 |
|
|
|
4.69 |
% |
State Street Bank and Trust (nominee)
|
|
|
48,625,179 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
Folketrygdfondet
|
|
|
47,699,635 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
JPMorgan Chase Bank (nominee)
|
|
|
22,657,683 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
% |
Euroclear Bank (nominee)
|
|
|
13,974,448 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
Vital Forsikring
|
|
|
13,193,640 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
Capital EuroPacific Growth Fund
|
|
|
12,392,000 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Capital New Perspective Fund
|
|
|
10,820,000 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
% |
Capital Word Growth and Income fund
|
|
|
7,329,500 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
Mellon Bank (nominee)
|
|
|
7,079,451 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
Clearstream Banking (nominee)
|
|
|
6,835,618 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
SIS Segaintersettle (nominee)
|
|
|
6,733,723 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
JPMorgan Chase Bank (nominee)
|
|
|
6,691,798 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
Investors Bank & Trust Company (nominee)
|
|
|
6,655,176 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
DnB NOR Norge (IV)
|
|
|
6.652,799 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
State Street Bank and Trust (nominee)
|
|
|
6,162,353 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
Goldman Sachs International
|
|
|
6,094,182 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
Goldman Sachs & Co (nominee)
|
|
|
5,595,742 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
Source:
Norwegian Central Securities Depository (VPS)
Related Parties
The following is a discussion of Hydro After Demergers related parties, namely the Norwegian
State, Aluminium Norf GmbH (Alunorf), Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.
A. (Alunorte), Sfr-Norge
Aluminium AS (Sfral), Aluminium & Chemie Rotterdam B. V. (Aluchemie), Meridan Technologies Inc.
(Meridan), Qatar Vinyl Company Ltd. (QVC) and Noretyl AS.
As of 31 December 2006, the Ministry of Trade and Industry of Norway owned 563,773,605 ordinary
shares. This represents 43.8 percent of the total number of ordinary shares authorized and issued
and 46 percent of the total shares outstanding. As of 31 December 2006 the National Insurance Fund
Folketrygdfondet owned 47,699,635 ordinary shares. This represents 3.7 percent of the total
number of ordinary shares issued and 3.9 percent of the total shares outstanding. In total, the
Norwegian State owns 611,473,240 ordinary shares. This represents 47.5 percent of the total number
of ordinary shares issued and 49.9 percent of the total shares outstanding. There are no
preferential voting rights associated with the ordinary shares held by the State. In the discussion
that follows, all previously reported share amounts or share prices have been adjusted to reflect
the 5-for-1 stock split effective 10 May 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
The Annual General Meeting held on 9 May 2006 approved a new buyback authorization of 22,470,482
shares over a one-year period. The Norwegian State has agreed to participate in the redemption of a
proportional number of shares in order to leave its percentage ownership interest unchanged.
Including the share redemption, a total of 40,000,000 shares may be cancelled. Share repurchases
can be made in the share price interval of NOK 50 to NOK 300 per
share, and the shares acquired in accordance with the authorization shall be for no other purpose than cancellation by
means of capital reduction. A final decision on cancelling any of the shares repurchased must be
approved by a minimum of two-thirds of the shares represented at a General Meeting of shareholders.
In addition, the 9 May 2006 Annual General Meeting resolved to revoke the buyback authorization
approved by the Extraordinary General Meeting held on 1 December 2004, allowing for a buyback of up
to 28,088,105 shares in the share price interval of NOK 40 to NOK 140 per share. The General
Meeting decided to cancel the acquired shares. The Norwegian State agreed to participate in the
redemption of a proportional number of shares in order to leave its percentage ownership interest
unchanged. Consequently, 3,644,685 shares were redeemed at a price of NOK 129.30 per share on 14
July 2006. A total of 8,316,685 shares at par value of NOK 3.66 per share were cancelled. For the
transactions, the Norwegian State received compensation of NOK 471 million.
In December 2004, an extraordinary General Meeting approved a capital reduction by cancellation of
14,044,050 treasury shares acquired in 2004 in a buyback program approved by the 2004 Annual
General Meeting. These shares were acquired at a market price of NOK 1,239 million. The
extraordinary General Meeting also authorized the redemption of 10,955,950 shares owned by the
Norwegian State. As compensation, the Norwegian State received NOK 981 million. The cancellation
and redemption were completed in February 2005.
In January 2004, an extraordinary General Meeting approved a capital reduction by cancellation of
7,421,500 treasury shares acquired in 2003 for a market price of NOK 555 million. The General
Meeting also authorized the redemption of 5,789,610 shares owned by the Norwegian State. As
compensation, the State received NOK 445 million. The cancellation and redemption were completed on
17 March 2004.
Aluminium Norf GmbH (Alunorf) is the worlds largest rolling mill located in Germany nearby other
Hydro facilities. Alunorf is jointly owned by Hydro and Novelis (50 percent each). Each partner
supplies Alunorf with raw material, which is transformed to flat rolled coils and delivered to the
partners. Sales from Alunorf to Hydro based on this tolling arrangement amounted to NOK 1,433
million in 2006, NOK 1,317 million in 2005 and NOK 1,373 million in 2004. Hydros revenues from
sales to Alunorf were not material. Alunorf is part of Rolled Products.
Alumina do Norte do Brasil S.A. (Alunorte) is an alumina refinery located in Brazil. Hydros
ownership share is 34 percent. Hydro purchased alumina from Alunorte amounting to NOK 2,751
million, 1,314 million, and NOK 1,109 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Alunorte is
part of Aluminium Metal.
Sør-Norge
Aluminium AS (Søral), part of Aluminium Metal, is a Norwegian primary aluminium
manufacturer. Søral sells 50 percent of its production to each major owner at current market
prices. The other 50 percent owner of Søral is Alcan. Sale of
aluminium from Søral to Hydro
amounted to NOK 1,531 million, NOK 1,047 million and NOK 1,115 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Sale of alumina, metal and carbon from Hydro to Søral amounted to NOK 568 million,
NOK 496 million and NOK 671 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Aluminium & Chemie Rotterdam B.V (Aluchemie) is an anode producer located in the Netherlands. Hydro
increased its shareholding in 2004 from 21.21 percent to 36.2 percent. Hydro purchased anodes from
Aluchemie amounting to NOK 587 million, NOK 482 million and 591 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Sales from Hydro to Aluchemie amounted to NOK 111 million, NOK 84 million and NOK 12
million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Aluchemie is part of Aluminium Metal.
Meridian Technologies Inc. (Meridian) is a Canadian company owned 51 percent by Teksid S.p.A. (a
subsidiary of the Fiat group) and 49 percent by Hydro. Meridian provides magnesium die-casting
products to the automobile industry. Meridian purchases alloyed magnesium from Hydro. Sales from
Hydro to Meridian amounted to NOK 38 million, NOK 196 million and NOK 238 million in 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. A contract to sell Hydros shares in Meridian was signed in December 2006 and
the transaction completed in March 2007 with no significant impact on Hydros results. Meridian was
part of Aluminium Products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
Hydro owns 29.7 percent of Qatar Vinyl Company Ltd (QVC). The other owners are three unaffiliated
companies. QVC produces Caustic Soda, EDC and VCM. Hydro and the other partners deliver technical,
marketing and support services to QVC. Hydro and Borealis each own 50 percent of Noretyl AS, a joint venture. Noretyl is part of Polymers.
Hydro paid processing fees to Noretyl for refining of NGL of NOK 267 million, NOK 277 million and
NOK 242 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
6.6.7
Corporate governance
Sound and transparent governance contributes to both value creation and improved results; it
builds trust and establishes a basis for responsible conduct. Corporate governance is therefore
central to Hydros development. Strategies and targets are developed on the basis of an integrated
governance and management system that builds on The Hydro Way-our framework for leadership,
organization and culture. Our corporate governance has been designed to provide a foundation for
value creation and to ensure good control mechanisms. Hydros main listing is on the Oslo Stock
Exchange. Hydro is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and five other stock
exchanges. Hydro complies with the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance of November
2006 and with legislation and NYSE requirements relevant to foreign companies listed on the NYSE.
6.6.8
Legal and arbitration proceedings
Management believes that there are no legal disputes or tax matters outstanding as of the
date of this Information Memorandum that will be material to Hydro After Demerger.
6.6.9
Material contracts
Material contracts are defined as any material contract entered into other than in the ordinary
course of the business.
Hydro had no material contracts for the two years preceding the date of this Information
Memorandum, other than the Merger Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
7 Risk factors related to the business of Hydro after the Demerger
Set forth below is a description of certain risks that may effect Hydros business, financial
condition and results of operations after the merger of Hydro Petroleum with Statoil.
The risk factors described below may not be inclusive of all the risks that will be faced by Hydro
after the Demerger. Other risks and uncertainties, including those not currently considered
material, may impair Hydros business.
Future acquisitions, mergers, or strategic alliances may adversely affect our financial condition.
Our business has grown partly through the acquisition of other businesses. For example, in 2002, we
acquired all of the outstanding shares of the German aluminium company VAW.
If the proposed merger of Hydros petroleum activities with Statoil is completed, we intend to
focus on growing our aluminium business through targeted international business development. We
also intend to play a role in the restructuring of the rolled products industry in Europe. Such
strategies may involve future mergers and acquisitions or strategic alliances.
There are numerous risks commonly encountered in business combinations, including the risk that we
may not be able to effectively integrate businesses acquired or generate the cost savings and
synergies anticipated. The integration of a business may involve a number of risks, including the
diversion of management attention and other corporate resources from day-to-day operations.
Integration of information and transaction systems can also be complex and time-consuming. Failures
could result in delays of critical business processes such as invoicing, payments and collections.
Unknown or unrecorded material liabilities could also exist within an acquired business and not be
detected regardless of adhering to accepted levels of investigation and due diligence in the
acquisition process. Similarly, expectations about future developments influencing the valuation of
assets may prove to be inaccurate, resulting in lower operating results and potential asset
write-downs. Any of these risks could have a material effect on our financial condition and
operating results. In addition, financial markets and investors closely follow merger and
acquisition activities. As a result, success or failure could have a substantial impact on our
share price and the overall valuation of the company.
A substantial or extended decline in aluminium prices would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The aluminium industry is highly cyclical. Virtually all aluminium end-use markets, including the
building, transportation and packaging industries, are also cyclical. In addition, there is
uncertainty concerning developments in supply and demand, in particular, regarding the overall
economic developments in China as well as potential further restructuring within the aluminium
industry as a whole. Price developments within the London Metal Exchange (LME), which represents
the main reference price for the industry, reflect the cyclicality and uncertainties discussed
above. Active trading by financial investors and investment funds on the LME has added a
significant risk of increased volatility in aluminium prices.
Fluctuations in prevailing aluminium prices could negatively affect the financial results of our
aluminium business.
Expansion of our business in emerging and transitioning market countries presents a higher degree
of financial, political, economic and business risk.
We have decided to reposition our aluminium business and focus more on upstream operations,
including primary metal production. In the future, development of new primary
capacity is expected to migrate to areas with abundant, low cost energy. Many such areas are
located in countries characterized by emerging and transitioning markets. We are also evaluating a
number of projects globally to grow and expand our upstream aluminium operations. New business
development offices have been opened in several key regions including Angola, Brazil, Indonesia,
Russia and South Africa.
We have a substantial interest in the Brazilian alumina refinery, Alunorte, and have decided to
participate in a further expansion of the plant. Alunorte is a key supplier of alumina for our
aluminium operations. The expansion will increase the relative importance of Alunorte as the major
supplier of raw materials for our smelters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Emerging or transitioning market countries may experience political instability, civil strife, acts
of war and local security concerns that threaten the safe operation of facilities, and governments
in such countries may engage in expropriation or nationalization of property, restrictions on
production or imports and exports, price controls, tax increases and cancellation of contract
rights. Any of these conditions occurring could disrupt or terminate our operations, causing
development activities to be curtailed or terminated in these areas or production to decline and
could result in additional costs. In addition, legal, fiscal and regulatory systems may be less
stable and have a lower degree of transparency, making investment evaluation more difficult and
increasing the risk that actual returns are substantially lower than expected.
Emerging and transitioning market countries represent a competitive threat to our businesses that
could be exacerbated by regulatory developments in Europe.
Emerging or transitioning market countries with abundant natural resources, low cost labor and
energy and lower environmental standards have posed and will continue to pose a competitive threat
to our business.
China, for example, has developed a substantial aluminium industry with a significant influence on
the global aluminium market balance. While consumption of primary aluminium in China has increased
at a very rapid pace in recent years, Chinas own increased production may decrease the need for
imports and thereby cause a decline in the market for our primary metal. Moreover, China is
expected to significantly increase production of semi-fabricated and finished aluminium products in
the near term, both of which could cause a decline in the market for our primary metal and metal
products. In recent years China also has developed substantial magnesium capacity based on
labor-intensive production processes. Increased quantities of Chinese magnesium available in
Western markets have resulted in significant downward pressure on prices and a substantial
restructuring of the Western magnesium industry, including our decision to exit the magnesium
business.
Russias aluminium industry is being consolidated into one major company that will control Russias
entire annual aluminium output of approximately 4 million mt. The new company will be an
increasingly important player in primary metal production and could adversely impact the market for
our production.
The EU has imposed a duty of 6 percent on imports of primary aluminium from non-EU countries, from
which duty imports from EEA countries, including Norway, are exempt. However, this duty has been
the subject of criticism and it is not possible to predict to what extent it will be maintained. In
January 2007, the EU Commission presented a proposal to reduce the duty from 6 percent to 3 percent
retroactively from 1 January 2007, and to eliminate it completely from 1 January 2009. While the
reduction of the duty to 3 percent from 2007 seems to have general support, its abolishment from
2008 is more controversal. See section in this report on Hydro
after the demerger - Regulation and
taxation - Aluminium regulation for further information. Any reduction or cancellation of this
duty
could result in increased primary aluminium in the EU market from sources such as Russia and place
downward pricing pressure on the primary metal we produce for the EU market.
Our businesses are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
Our business is impacted by changes in exchange rates primarily relating to the Norwegian kroner,
Euro and US dollar.
Aluminium prices are denominated in US dollars while our operating results are reported in
Norwegian kroner. Accordingly, operating results will, in general, decline when the Norwegian
kroner strengthens against the US dollar or Euro.
Our aluminium smelters are located in several countries other than the United States. As a result,
a substantial portion of fixed costs is denominated in currencies other than the US dollar. The
weak US dollar has resulted in a decline in the competitive position of our aluminium smelter
system. As a result of weakened competitiveness due to the strengthened Euro compared to the US
dollar and increasing energy costs, we wrote down the value of our German smelter system in 2004 by
approximately NOK 2.3 billion. Our downstream aluminium operations within the Euro-zone have also
suffered a decline in competitiveness compared to US dollar based competitors as a result of the
continuing weak US dollar.
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
Our reported earnings are subject to substantial volatility as a result of fluctuations in the
market value of commodity contracts.
We are exposed to market risks from commodity price fluctuations. Market risk exposures are
determined on a net exposure basis taking advantage of offsetting positions. We use derivative
contracts to hedge certain exposures. For example, we hedge metal prices when entering into
customer and supplier contracts with corresponding futures contracts at fixed prices. We have also
initiated hedging programs relating to several of our metal plants. In addition, certain of our
normal purchase and sales contracts are deemed to be derivatives under United States Generally
Accepted Accounting Principals (US GAAP). In accordance with SFAS 133, all derivative instruments
are required to be included in the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met. Changes in the fair value of such
contracts could cause significant fluctuations in our reported earnings.
We are exposed to risks relating to trading and commercial activities.
We are engaged in substantial trading and commercial activities in the physical markets and also
use financial instruments such as forwards, futures and options both on and off exchanges in order
to manage and hedge certain fluctuations in prices and production volumes.
Although we believe we have established appropriate risk management procedures, trading activities
involve elements of forecasting and we bear the risk of market
movements - the risk of significant
losses if prices move contrary to expectations - and the risk of default by counter parties. Any of
these risks could result in lower profits and could cause the value of our shares to decline.
We may suffer a major operational incident resulting in loss of life or extensive damage to the
environment or communities, resulting in substantial damage to our reputation or financial
position.
Our business demands large and complex industrial sites involving extensive numbers of employees.
Certain of our operations are located in close proximity to sizable communities while other
operations are situated in areas highly sensitive to environmental harm. Important and sizable
production facilities are located on the west coast of Norway, an area subject to extreme and
dramatic weather on a periodic basis.
The safe operation of all facilities is paramount in our governance model and management systems.
However, major accidents due to human error, systems failures, extreme weather or deliberate
sabotage, while considered remote, could result in loss of life or extensive damage to the
environment or communities, resulting in substantial damage to our reputation, financial position
and future prospects.
We are exposed to the risk of a deterioration or sudden dramatic decline in our reputation among
important stakeholders.
Our future success depends on acknowledging and actively monitoring the concerns of all legitimate
stakeholders, including employees, investors, governments, civil society groups, non-governmental
organizations and the communities in which we operate. Failure to take appropriate consideration of
legitimate corporate responsibility issues in investment decisions and day-to-day operations could
have a material impact on our reputation or share value.
Inappropriate or inadequate communication following a major crisis, such as a major operational
incident, breach of law or ethics or leak of market-sensitive confidential information could
quickly and seriously impair our reputation. Depending on the nature of such a major crisis,
effective communication may not mitigate serious damage to our reputation and may render our
company subject to criminal and civil prosecution or class action suits by shareholders and other
interested parties. Any of these risks could have a material impact on our share value.
We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the
jurisdictions in which we operate.
We incur, and expect to continue to incur, substantial capital and operating costs and expenditures
to comply with new laws and regulations increasing the protection of the environment and natural
resources and the promotion of health and safety. These laws and regulations impose more stringent
standards and requirements and potential liabilities regarding accidents and injuries, the
construction and operation of our plants and facilities, oil spills or discharges, air and water
pollutant emissions, the storage, treatment and discharge of waste waters, the use and handling of
hazardous or toxic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
materials, waste disposal practices, and the remediation of environmental
contamination, among other things. Although we believe we are in substantial compliance with
currently applicable environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, there is a possibility
of unintentional violation by us or violations by partners or other parties that we may be involved
with. Violations of such laws and regulations could result in substantial fines or penalties, costs
of corrective works and, in rare instances, the suspension or shutdown of our operations.
In addition, new laws and regulations, the imposition of tougher licensing requirements or
increasingly strict enforcement or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, may result
in additional, substantial capital or operating costs, including for modifying operations,
installing pollution control equipment and implementing additional safety measures.
Environmental laws may impose cleanup liability on owners and occupiers of contaminated property,
including past or divested properties, regardless of whether the owners and occupiers caused the
contamination or whether the activity that caused the contamination was lawful at the time it was
conducted. Many of our present and former operations are and were located on properties with a long
history of industrial use. Hazardous or other waste materials may have been disposed of or released
at or from these properties, and examinations that have taken place at certain of these properties
may not be sufficient to ascertain that they are free from contamination. Investigation and
remediation of contamination, including previously unknown contamination discovered, can result in
significant costs and liabilities for us.
We are also subject to claims made for damage to property or injury, including adverse health
effects, to employees and other persons resulting from the environmental, health or safety effects
of our operations or past contamination. While we are not presently the subject of any material
claims in this regard, there can be no assurance that such claims will not be made or that, if
made, such claims will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
We may not be successful in attracting and retaining sufficient skilled employees.
We are highly dependent on the continuous development and successful application of new
technologies. In addition, our position as a major, global industrial company requires substantial
capacity and competence in terms of complex management and critical business processes. In order to
manage new developments in a rapidly changing world and to achieve future growth, we must recruit
and retain qualified scientists, engineers, managers and other professionals within the areas of
human resources, finance and accounting, law and communications.
Demand for personnel with the range of capabilities and experience required in our businesses is
high and success in attracting and retaining such employees is not guaranteed. Failure to retain
and attract critical personnel could result in a shortage of such people due to normal attrition.
This could result in the inability to maintain the appropriate technological or business
improvements or take advantage of new opportunities that may arise. A subsequent decline in
competitiveness could have a negative impact on our operating results and financial condition.
Preferential rights may not be available to US holders of our shares.
Under Norwegian law, prior to our issuance of any new shares against consideration in cash, we must
offer holders of our then outstanding shares preferential rights to subscribe and pay for a
sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentages, unless these rights
are waived at a general meeting of our shareholders. These preferential rights are generally
transferable during the subscription period for the related offering and may be quoted on the Oslo
Stock Exchange (the OSE).
US holders of our shares may not be able to receive, trade or exercise preferential rights for new
shares unless a registration statement under the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act) is effective with respect to such rights or an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act is available. If US holders of our shares are not able to
receive, trade or exercise preferential rights granted in respect of their shares in any rights
offering conducted by us, then they may not receive the economic benefit of such rights. In
addition, their proportional ownership interests in Hydro will be diluted.
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
Holders of our shares that are registered in a nominee account may not be able to exercise voting
rights as readily as shareholders whose shares are registered in their own names with the VPS.
Beneficial owners of Hydros shares that are registered in a nominee account, such as through
brokers, dealers or other third parties, may not vote such shares unless their ownership is
re-registered in their own names with the Norwegian Central Securities Depository,
Verdipapirsentralen (the VPS), prior to Hydro general meetings. We cannot guarantee that beneficial
owners of our shares will receive the notice for a general meeting in time to instruct their
nominees to either effect a re-registration of their shares or otherwise vote their shares in the
manner desired by such beneficial owners.
It may be difficult for investors based in the United States to enforce civil liabilities
predicated on US securities laws against us, our Norwegian affiliates, or our directors and
executive officers.
We are organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Norway. All of our directors and executive
officers reside outside the United States. Further, a significant portion of our assets, and those
of our directors and executive officers, are located in Norway and other Western European
countries. As a result, it may be difficult for investors in the United States to effect service of
process within the United States upon us or our directors and executive officers or to enforce
against us or our directors and executive officers judgments obtained in US courts predicated on
the civil liability provisions of US federal securities laws. Although US investors may bring
actions against Hydro, our Norwegian affiliates or any of our directors or executive officers
resident in Norway, Norwegian courts are unlikely to apply US law when deciding such cases.
Accordingly, there is doubt as to the enforceability, in original actions in Norwegian courts, of
liabilities predicated solely on US federal securities laws. Furthermore, judgments of US courts
are not enforceable in Norway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
8 Share capital
8.1 Share capital prior to and after the Demerger
As at the date of this Information Memorandum, Hydro has an authorized and issued share capital of NOK 4,708,426,965
divided into 1,286,455,455 ordinary shares each with a par value of NOK 3.66. 59,657,675 out of these shares are
treasury shares, resulting in 1,226,797,780 outstanding shares. All of the shares have equal voting rights.
Hydro expects to repurchase 621,895 shares in the market during the third quarter of 2007. Hydro will ask for an
authorization to repurchase these shares at the Extraordinary General Meeting.This corresponds to the number of shares
that were sold to Hydros employees in Norway on 24 April and 4 May 2007. The sale of shares to employees is a general
arrangement offered to employees in Norway.
Hydro expects to redeem 16,871,506 shares owned by the Norwegian State at the Extraordinary General Meeting related
to share repurchases of 21,627,000 shares which Hydro made in the market during 2006. Pursuant to an agreement with
the Norwegian State, the Norwegian State will participate proportionally in any repurchases Hydro made in the market.
The compensation to be paid for the Norwegian States shares is estimated at approximately NOK 2.7 billion. At the
Extraordinary General Meeting, the Board of Directors of Hydro will propose to redeem the 16,571,506 owned by the
Norwegian States shares and to cancel the 21,627,000 treasury shares purchased in the market during 2006, in total
38,498,506 shares.
Provided that these resolutions are adopted, Hydros authorized and issued share capital will, prior to the merger of
Hydro Petroleum with Statoil, be reduced to NOK 4,567,522,433 and the number of shares will be reduced to
1,247,956,949. The number of treasury shares will be reduced to 38,652,570, resulting in 1,209,304,379 outstanding
shares.
The Demerger of Hydro will be effected through a reduction of Hydros share capital by NOK
3,197,256,703 from NOK 4,567,522,433 to NOK 1,370,256,730 by reduction of the par value of each
share from NOK 3.66 to NOK 1.098. After the Demerger Hydro will have an authorized and issued share
capital of NOK 1,370,256,730 divided into 1,247,956,949 shares, each with a par value of NOK 1.098,
out of which 38,652,570 will be treasury stock.
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum |
8.2 Share capital development in the last three years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per |
|
Per |
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
shares in |
|
Issued |
|
Treasury |
|
Outstanding |
|
share |
|
value |
|
capital |
Date |
|
Type of change |
|
transaction |
|
shares |
|
stock |
|
shares |
|
(NOK) |
|
(NOK) |
|
(NOK) |
|
Balance 31 December 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,596,650 |
|
|
|
(9,884,650 |
) |
|
|
256,712,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
5,331,933,000 |
|
|
17 March 2004 |
|
Redemption of share from Norwegian Sate |
|
|
1,157,922 |
|
|
|
266,596,650 |
|
|
|
(11,042,572 |
) |
|
|
255,554,078 |
|
|
|
374.00 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
5,331,933,000 |
|
17 March 2004 |
|
Cancellation of treasury stock |
|
|
2,642,222 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,400,350 |
) |
|
|
255,554,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
5,279,088,560 |
|
24 March 2004 |
|
Demerger of Yara International ASA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,400,350 |
) |
|
|
255,554,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
2 June 2004 |
|
Sale of treasury stock to employees |
|
|
285,152 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,115,198 |
) |
|
|
255,839,230 |
|
|
|
212.25 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
1 - 30 June 2004 |
|
Purchase of own share |
|
|
653,000 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,768,198 |
) |
|
|
255,186,230 |
|
|
|
434.45 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
1 - 31 July 2004 |
|
Purchase of own share |
|
|
630,460 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(9,398,658 |
) |
|
|
254,555,770 |
|
|
|
432.02 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
1 - 31 August 2004 |
|
Purchase of own share |
|
|
1,055,200 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(10,453,858 |
) |
|
|
253,500,570 |
|
|
|
434.41 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
1 - 30 September 2004 |
|
Purchase of own share |
|
|
470,150 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(10,924,008 |
) |
|
|
253,030,420 |
|
|
|
476.65 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
1 December 2004 |
|
Redemption of shares from Norwegian State |
|
|
2,191,190 |
|
|
|
263,954,428 |
|
|
|
(13,115,198 |
) |
|
|
250,839,230 |
|
|
|
441.00 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,830,366,032 |
|
1 December 2004 |
|
Cancellation of treasury stock |
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,115,198 |
) |
|
|
250,839,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
|
Balance 31 December 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,115,198 |
) |
|
|
250,839,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
|
1 - 30 April 2005 |
|
Sale of treasury stock to employees |
|
|
233,634 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(7,881,564 |
) |
|
|
251,072,864 |
|
|
|
260.25 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
1 - 30 June 2005 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
96,600 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(7,978,164 |
) |
|
|
250,976,264 |
|
|
|
531.52 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
1 - 31 August 2005 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
97,400 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,075,564 |
) |
|
|
250,878,864 |
|
|
|
661.85 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
1 - 30 September 2005 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
116,400 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,191,964 |
) |
|
|
250,762,464 |
|
|
|
684.66 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
1 - 31 October 2005 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
106,000 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,297,964 |
) |
|
|
250,656,464 |
|
|
|
633.45 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
1 - 30 November 2005 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
413,000 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,710,964 |
) |
|
|
250,243,464 |
|
|
|
661.31 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
1 - 30 December 2005 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,815,964 |
) |
|
|
250,138,464 |
|
|
|
691.31 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
|
Balance 30 December 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,815,964 |
) |
|
|
250,138,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
|
1 - 30 April 2006 |
|
Sale of treasury stock to employees |
|
|
151,050 |
|
|
|
258,954,428 |
|
|
|
(8,664,914 |
) |
|
|
250,289,514 |
|
|
|
388.85 |
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
9 May 2006 |
|
5-for-1 stock split |
|
|
1,035,817,712 |
|
|
|
1,294,772,140 |
|
|
|
(43,324,570 |
) |
|
|
1,251,447,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
9 May 2006 |
|
Redemption of shares from Norwegian State |
|
|
3,644,685 |
|
|
|
1,294,772,140 |
|
|
|
(46,969,255 |
) |
|
|
1,247,802,885 |
|
|
|
129.30 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,738,866,032 |
|
9 May 2006 |
|
Cancellation of treasury stock |
|
|
8,316,685 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(38,652,570 |
) |
|
|
1,247,802,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
24 - 31 May 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
3,262,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(41,914,570 |
) |
|
|
1,244,540,885 |
|
|
|
168.66 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
1 - 30 June 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
5,007,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(46,921,570 |
) |
|
|
1,239,533,885 |
|
|
|
159.17 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
15 - 31 July 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
685,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(47,606,570 |
) |
|
|
1,238,848,885 |
|
|
|
174.80 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
1 - 31 August 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
4,144,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(51,750,570 |
) |
|
|
1,234,704,885 |
|
|
|
172.48 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
1 - 30 September 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
3,352,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(55,102,570 |
) |
|
|
1,231,352,885 |
|
|
|
152.66 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
1 - 30 November 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
2,962,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(58,064,570 |
) |
|
|
1,228,390,885 |
|
|
|
153.24 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
1 - 13 December 2006 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
2,215,000 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(60,279,570 |
) |
|
|
1,226,175,885 |
|
|
|
149.02 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
|
Balance 31 December 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(60,279,570 |
) |
|
|
1,226,175,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
|
|
Sale of
treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 April - 4 May 2007 |
|
stock to employees |
|
|
621,895 |
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(59,657,675 |
) |
|
|
1,226,797,780 |
|
|
|
97.73 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
|
Balance 15 May 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,286,455,455 |
|
|
|
(59,657,675 |
) |
|
|
1,226,797,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
4,708,426,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro Information Memorandum
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
9 Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Oslo, 29
May 2007
Norsk Hydro ASA
/s/ John Ove Ottestad
John Ove Ottestad
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer