fwp
Filed Pursuant To Rule 433
Registration No. 333-167132
July 26, 2011
Gold Investment Digest
Fourth quarter and full year 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2011
|
|
www.gold.org |
Overview
The gold price rose for the tenth consecutive year driven by a recovery in key sectors of demand
and continued global economic uncertainty. Not only was golds performance strong, but its
volatility remained low, providing a foundation for a well diversified portfolio.
Price trends
The price of gold rose 29% in 2010 to US$1,405.50/oz by December-end, on the London PM fix. Gold
returns were higher in euro and pound sterling terms, as ripples from the European debt crisis
continued to be felt. Gold outperformed versus equities, treasuries and commodity indices while
golds price volatility fell to 16% during 2010, in line with its long-term average. Read more...
Investment trends
Investors bought 361 tonnes of gold in 2010 via ETFs, bringing total holdings to a new high of
2,167 tonnes, worth US$98 billion. In the futures market, COMEX gold net long positions remained
robust. Buy-side interest for OTC products in gold increased considerably during Q4 and full year
2010. Similarly, investment demand in bars and coins in North America, Europe, China, India and the
Middle East remains high. Read more...
Market and economic influences
Gold benefitted from mixed economic news around the world as investors looked for alternatives to
balance risk and performance in their portfolios. First, concerns over sovereign debt and
expansions of quantitative easing pushed investors to hedge currency risks and find strategies to
protect against tail risk. Second, strong economic growth in emerging markets has led to robust
commodity demand as well as higher inflation. Read more...
Gold market trends
Preliminary reports suggest that key gold markets recovered in 2010 and that India is poised to
have a strong rebound in 2010. In China, the gold market appears to have maintained its strong
momentum. Gold use in technology continued to grow. European central bank sales remained negligible
while the IMF completed its gold sales programme. Additionally, emerging market central banks
continue to increase their gold reserves. Read more...
Contents
Contributors
Juan Carlos Artigas
juancarlos.artigas@gold.org
Johan Palmberg
johan.palmberg@gold.org
Eily Ong
eily.ong@gold.org
Louise Street
louise.street@gold.org
Marcus Grubb
marcus.grubb@gold.org
Price trends
The price of gold rose for the tenth consecutive year in 2010, exhibiting a particularly strong
performance during the second and fourth quarters of the year. This was partly due to investment
activity as well as a recovery in sectors such as jewellery and technology. By 30 December, it had
reached US$1,405.50/oz, on the London PM fix, a 29.2% rise from year-earlier levels. Similarly,
average prices during the year rose to US$1,224.52/oz from US$972.35/oz in 2009 (Chart 1).
During 2010, the price of gold rose to record levels on several occasions, trading as high as
US$1,420.00/oz on 7 December, on the London PM fix. Gold prices increased by 2.6%, 11.5%, 5.1% and
7.5% on Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 2010 respectively, on a quarter-on-quarter basis. The average gold price
increased to US$1,224.52/oz during 2010 from US$972.32/oz the previous year. While the gold price
has seen a modest pull back from its 2010 highs toward year-end and into January 2011, the move is
by no means unprecedented or unusual. To put these movements into perspective, the price of gold
fell by 3.7% between 7 December 2010, when gold reached its 2010 high on the London PM fix, and 14
January 2011, at the time of writing. This represents considerably less than a 1-standard deviation
move for a given month, for which the average volatility has been 4.9% over the past 10 years.
Golds long-term supply and demand dynamics and several macro-economic factors ensured gold
remained a sought-after asset. First, concerns continued to be felt over the health of economic
growth in developed countries, especially among European nations on the back of the sovereign debt
crisis and possible contagions to other regions. As such, European investors have turned to gold as
a hedge against currency risks. Second, extensions and expansions of quantitative easing measures
by central banks in the US, UK and Japan continued to make gold an attractive investment. Moreover,
pressure on the US dollar against various currencies coupled with higher inflation expectations in
many countries, including India and China, pushed the price of gold up. Third, official sector
activity continued to be supportive of the gold market as sales by European central banks remained
negligible and the IMF
Chart 1: Gold price (US$/oz), London PM fix
|
|
|
Source: |
|
The London Bullion Market Association |
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
concluded its limited gold sales programme, while in several emerging markets central banks
continued to increase their gold reserves. Fourth, while data for Q4 2010 is still pending,
jewellery consumption moved at a healthy pace during the first three quarters of the year. India,
for example, is poised to reach tonnage levels seen prior to the global financial crisis.
Similarly, Chinese consumption continued to grow at a considerable rate. Moreover, investment
activity in those regions, driven partly by innovative new investment vehicles offering improved
access to the gold market, continued to expand. Finally, gold usage in electronics and other
technological applications remained a steady source of demand.
Developed markets
The price of gold reached new highs in most developed market currencies during 2010, the notable
exception being the Australian dollar as shown in Table 1. However, golds performance was the
strongest in US dollar, euro and pound sterling terms during the year in general and Q4 2010 in
particular. As the European debt crisis continued to unfold, investors in Europe used gold as a
currency hedge. Similarly, a weak US labour market and monetary policies implemented by the Federal
Reserve made gold an asset of choice for many investors, locally and externally. For example,
during 2010, gold prices rose by 39.7%, 34.9% and 29.2% in euro, pound sterling, and US dollar
terms respectively. On the other hand, currency appreciation in Switzerland, Japan, Australia and,
to some extent, Canada made gold gains appear more modest, rising by about 15.0% in most cases.
Moreover, as the Australian economy recovered strongly during 2010 and its currency appreciated
against the US dollar, gold prices during 2010 did not surpass the record level of AU$1,535.24/oz
seen on 20 February 2009.
During 2010, markets in many developed countries experienced risk aversion and negative investor
sentiment due to concerns about the prospects for weak economic growth. Consequently, while many
financial assets exhibited a positive performance during the year, equities in the US and Europe
showed only moderate gains. For example, the S&P 500 rose by 12.8% while MSCI World ex US Index
(which is heavily weighted towards European equities) increased by 6.2%, in US dollar terms.
Similarly, the performance of US Treasuries, as represented by the Barclays US Treasuries aggregate
index was measured and rose only by 5.9% over the year. On the other hand, during 2010, the S&P
Goldman Sachs Commodities Index (S&P GSCI) rose by 20.4%, as industrial demand started to improve
in Germany and China. This was also evidenced by upward pressure on the price of oil which
increased by 22.2% to US$94.30/bbl by the end of December 2010 from US$77.20/bbl the previous year.
On a risk-adjusted basis, gold had a stellar performance during 2010 relative to most assets that
investors might hold in a portfolio (Chart 2). It considerably outperformed not only equity and
commodity markets, but also assets such as US Treasuries which tend to have much lower
volatilities. Beyond its strong price performance, golds relatively low volatility and lack of
correlation to many assets makes it an ideal candidate for portfolio diversification and risk
management strategies.
Table 1: Gold performance developed markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
31 Dec 2010 |
|
|
2010 max |
|
|
2010 min |
|
|
QoQ |
|
|
YoY |
|
|
Vol* |
|
US$/oz |
|
|
1,405.50 |
|
|
|
1,421.00 |
|
|
|
1,058.00 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
GBP/oz |
|
|
913.02 |
|
|
|
913.02 |
|
|
|
671.91 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
EUR/oz |
|
|
1,059.71 |
|
|
|
1,070.97 |
|
|
|
758.42 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
CHF/oz |
|
|
1,316.81 |
|
|
|
1,432.15 |
|
|
|
1,127.03 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
JPY/oz |
|
|
114,885.57 |
|
|
|
118,243.40 |
|
|
|
94,489.98 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
CAD/oz |
|
|
1,407.33 |
|
|
|
1,432.50 |
|
|
|
1,116.61 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
AUD/oz |
|
|
1,388.29 |
|
|
|
1,509.94 |
|
|
|
1,196.30 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised volatility based on daily returns. |
|
Source: |
|
London Bullion Market Association, Bloomberg, WGC |
Chart 2: Annualised return versus annualised daily return volatility for various assets; 12/31/0912/31/10
|
|
|
Note: |
|
For comparison purposes, gold performance was computed using 5pm EST prices. |
|
Source: |
|
Bloomberg, Barclays Capital |
Emerging Markets
Many emerging market currencies gained ground on the US dollar during 2010, including the fourth
quarter. Emerging market equities as measured by the MSCI Emerging Market equity index were
up by 16.4% in US dollar terms, the best performance among international equity markets, largely
driven by a healthier economic rebound in those economies.
While emerging equity markets experienced heavy capital inflows during the year, some developing
economies currencies fared better than others. On the one hand, gold prices rose higher in Turkish
lira and Russian rouble terms, by 30.4% and 33.1% respectively, as a combination of extreme weather
events and their trading links with Europe had a negative impact on those currencies versus the US
dollar (Table 2).
On the other hand, as the South African rand and, more modestly, the Indian rupee and Chinese yuan
appreciated against the US dollar, gold prices in these currencies were up by 16.6%, 23.9% and
25.0% respectively. Indeed, similar to the Australian dollar, gold prices in South African rand
terms during 2010 did not breach the record high of R.10,011.00/oz set in early 2009. This was due,
in part, to currency appreciation in these countries, which are large commodity producers, on the
back of strong global commodity demand. In India, gold prices averaged Rs. 1,741.50/g (approx. Rs.
56,000.00/oz) during the year and Rs. 1,908.25/g (Rs. 61,350.00/oz) during Q4 2010. In China, a
moderate 3.2% appreciation of the yuan versus the US dollar during the year meant that Chinese
consumers did not see the gold price climb as much as their US counterparts. Overall, currency
appreciation coupled with consistent economic growth in India and China, has sustained demand for
gold not only in the jewellery sector, but also as an investment vehicle especially as inflation
creeps up.
Table 2: Gold performance emerging markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
31 Dec 2010 |
|
|
2010 max |
|
|
2010 min |
|
|
QoQ |
|
|
YoY |
|
|
Vol* |
|
RUB/oz |
|
|
42,966.14 |
|
|
|
44,204.60 |
|
|
|
32,323.29 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
TRY/oz |
|
|
2,184.43 |
|
|
|
2,196.72 |
|
|
|
1,609.55 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
CNY/oz |
|
|
9,277.42 |
|
|
|
9,441.12 |
|
|
|
7,223.07 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
INR/oz |
|
|
63,022.62 |
|
|
|
63,608.41 |
|
|
|
49,435.05 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
ZAR/oz |
|
|
9,367.52 |
|
|
|
9,811.51 |
|
|
|
8,033.58 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised volatility based on daily returns. |
|
Source: |
|
LBMA, Bloomberg, WGC |
Commodity performance
As sentiment improved among consumers and investors in developing economies and certain developed
markets, demand for commodities rose during 2010. Consequently, commodity prices increased, in most
cases posting double-digit returns during the year. Notably, low inventory levels and ever
increasing demand from China, which contributes a 40% share of total demand for a number for
industrial metals, had a positive effect on price. The fourth quarter was no exception and
commodity prices followed a similar trend as was seen during the first three quarters of the year.
During 2010, palladium and silver were the best performing commodities, rising by an impressive
96.6% and 80.3% respectively. Other metals with a high degree of exposure to industrial demand rose
significantly: tin, nickel and copper rose by 61.2%, 35.0%, and 32.6% respectively, from
year-earlier levels. Only zinc dropped 5.3% during the year. Gains in precious metals such as gold
(29.5%) and platinum (20.9%) were robust. Extreme periods of drought and flood, lower than expected
crop yields and sustained high Chinese
consumption kept agricultural commodities well bid, and the S&P Goldman Sachs Agricultural Index
increased by 34.2%. Livestock prices, as measured by the S&P Goldman Sachs Livestock Index, rose by
a modest 10.5% during the year. See Table 3.
Table 3: Commodities returns and volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% QoQ |
|
% YoY |
|
% Vol* |
Gold London PM fix (US$/oz) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Silver London fix (US$/oz) |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
Palladium (US$/oz) |
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
Platinum (US$/oz) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Aluminum (US$/t) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
Copper (US$/t) |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
Lead (US$/t) |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
Nickel (US$/t) |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
Tin (US$/t) |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
Zinc (US$/t) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
-5.3 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
Brent crude oil (US$/bbl) |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
S&P GS Commodity Index |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
S&P GS Agriculture Index |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
S&P GS Livestock Index |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
DJ UBS Commodity Index |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
R/J CRB Commodity Index |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised volatility based on daily returns. |
|
Source: |
|
Bloomberg, WGC |
|
1 |
|
The VIX Index is a popular measure of the implied volatility and is a weighted-average of prices
for a range of options at different strike prices on the S&P 500 Index. |
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Price volatility
In general, equity market volatility fell during the second half of 2010, following the highly
volatile period experienced during Q2 2010 at the height of the European sovereign debt crisis.
However, throughout the year, market participants did react strongly to economic and financial news
including developments centred on the European sovereign debt crisis, inflation in emerging
markets, and concerns over global economic growth. As a consequence, equity market risk by the end
of 2010, as measured by the VIX index,1 remained higher than levels seen at the beginning of the
year as seen in Chart 3.
For the gold market, a measured price appreciation translated into lower realised volatility during
the year. The annualised gold volatility in 2010 was 16.1% compared to 21.4% the previous year,
similar to its historical trend of 15.8% over the past 20 years. However, in line with other
commodities, gold prices saw a moderate increase in volatility during Q4 2010 to 17.8% from a
multi-year low of 13.0% the previous quarter, on an annualised basis. In particular, volatility
rose during October and November as the Federal Reserve announced its QE2 programme and the state
of finances in Ireland and its potential spill-over to other European nations made headlines. By
the end of December, however, activity had normalised and realised one-month (22-day) volatility
had moved down to 13.8%.
Gold is a unique asset among commodities for many reasons. In particular, gold remained, on
average, one of the least volatile of the commodities that WGC monitors (Chart 4). Volatility on
the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index was 20.8% during the year, based on daily returns, compared
to 16.1% for gold. Only livestock had lower realised volatility than gold at 12.7% during 2010.
Zinc, palladium, nickel and lead were the most volatile commodities consistently during the year,
all having average volatilities of more than 35.0%. Most other commodities had volatilities over
20.0%, including crude oil with an annualised volatility of 28.4%.
Chart 3: Gold and S&P GS Commodity Index annualised price volatility (22-day rolling, %) and the
VIX Index (level)
Chart 4: Annualised daily volatility during 2010 for selected commodities
|
|
|
Source: |
|
IHS Global Insight, WGC |
Investment trends
Investors continued to access the gold market in multiple ways during 2010. Exchange traded funds
(ETFs) were a popular choice among investors and they continue to flourish in various parts of the
world. Coin and bar purchases remained high while the over-the-counter (OTC) market was very active
and has seen an increase in demand for index-based and other innovative investment vehicles.
Exchange traded funds
Net inflows into gold via exchange traded funds (ETFs) and similar investment vehicles remained
robust during 2010. The gold-backed ETFs that the World Gold Council (WGC) monitors saw net inflows
of 361.0 tonnes during 2010, the second largest on record after the 617.0 tonnes of net inflows
experienced during 2009 (Chart 5). This brought total holdings to a new high of 2,167.4 tonnes by
31 December 2010, worth US$98 billion at the year-end gold price as investors saw in gold an
invaluable asset for risk management and hedging purposes.
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) listed on the NYSE and cross-listed in Mexico, Singapore, Tokyo and Hong
Kong experienced net inflows of 147.1 tonnes in 2010, especially driven by strong buying during Q2.
This brought its total assets under management to 1,280.7 tonnes of gold by year-end. It was
followed by ETFS Physical Gold Shares, the second largest gold-backed ETF, which added a collective
56.6 tonnes across its listings in the US, London and Switzerland, bringing its total holdings to
165.1 tonnes. Similarly, ZKB Gold ETF, listed in Switzerland, and iShares Gold Trust (IAU), listed
on the NYSE, added 42.5 and 37.8 tonnes of gold respectively, during the year. Only JSE-listed New
Gold ETF experienced outflows larger than 1 tonne of gold during the year. This illustrates that
ETFs have become a convenient and cost-effective route to access gold for investors in multiple
markets.
Notably, in India, gold ETFs (the majority of which are currently wholly backed by gold bullion,
but can also contain a percentage of derivative contracts) also grew significantly during 2010 to
approximately 15 tonnes by the end of December. Following a similar trend, a fund of funds
investing in offshore ETFs was introduced in early January under the Qualified Domestic
Institutional Investors (QDII) programme.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Chart 5: Gold ETF holdings in tonnes and the gold price (US$/oz)
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Gold holdings are as reported by the ETF/ETC issuers. Where data is unavailable, holdings
have been calculated using reported AUM numbers. |
|
Source: |
|
Respective ETF/ETC providers, Bloomberg, LBMA, WGC |
ETF options
While the ETF market has seen an increase in option trading as of late, adding depth to the ETF
market, the majority of the volume is still being transacted on GLD. In turn, GLD options activity
remained high throughout 2010, particularly rising during Q4 2010, partly as levered plays as well
as hedging vehicles. Average daily volume in 2010 was 208,130 contracts approaching the previous
record volume of 214,000 contracts seen in Q4 2009. By the fourth quarter of 2010, GLD daily option
volume had risen to 257,600 contracts, especially driven by activity observed by the end of October
and beginning of November, as markets prepared for the size and timing of QE2. Indeed, call option
volume rose more than put volume during the fourth quarter as investors were quantifying the
negative impact on the US dollar following QE2 and its subsequent positive effect on gold. Trading
volume subsided by year-end, and went back to the daily 2010 average of 208,000 contracts in
December. In line with its historical performance, open interest on call options accounted for the
majority of traded contracts, at an average of 2.4 million contracts during the year, compared to
1.7 million put contracts; however, open interest in put options experienced the largest overall
gain, as investors likely positioned to lock in gains as the gold price trended higher throughout
2010.
Realised 60-day GLD volatility followed the same pattern as gold-price volatility, reaching an
all-time low of 10.2% by the end of Q3 2010 and rising again to 18.1% by the end of Q4. The 3-month
ATM (at-the-money) implied GLD volatility, on the other hand, traded in a range between 17.1% and
25.8% during 2010. The spread of 3-month implied volatility had almost disappeared by the end of
December, suggesting that demand in the options market for protection against volatility in the
gold market had normalised from Q3 2010 levels.
Gold futures
COMEX total non-commercial and non-reportable net long positions, a measure of more speculative
investment demand, remained robust during 2010. The net long hovered around 26.3 million ounces
(818.1 tonnes) in 2010, very similar to the 26.0 million-ounce average seen throughout H2 2009
(Chart 6). In general, a healthy net long level supports the view that many investors continue to
see value in the gold trade. Net long positions in the fourth quarter of 2010 increased by 6.9%
relative to the third quarter, as long-only positions outnumbered their short-only counterparts.
However, on a percentage basis, short-only positions increased the most, rising 17.3% on average
during Q4 2010 relative to the previous quarter; long-only contracts had a more modest 8.9%
increase during the same period as some investors sought to benefit from year-end profit taking on
the gold market.
Over-the-counter market
According to research carried out by GFMS on behalf of the WGC, activity in the over-the-counter
(OTC) market was robust throughout 2010, similar to the pattern observed in other sectors of
investment demand. In particular, the OTC market surged in Q4 2010, with some substantial long
positions being taken recently. However, some reports show investors switched from long to short
positions when gold breached the US$1,400.00/oz mark. Nevertheless, the overall net impact of the
OTC flows is considered, on balance, to have had a positive influence on the physical market and
contributed to golds performance during the quarter and the year. GFMS analysis suggests that many
investors shifted into the OTC market during Q4 from the ETF and futures market.
In general, demand for gold derivatives in the OTC market was particularly strong during the fourth
quarter, as investors sought to gain leveraged exposure in a rising price environment. Demand for
allocated metal accounts also grew. Moreover, in addition to inflows into spot, forward and vanilla
derivative products in gold, demand increased quite notably for basket and index products in
commodities that contain a weighting in gold. Indeed, investor interest in these products surged in
2010, as commodity prices in general experienced a powerful rally.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Chart 6: COMEX net long on non-commercial and non-reportable positions on the active gold futures
contract (million oz) versus the gold price (US$/oz)
|
|
|
Source: |
|
COMEX, Bloomberg, WGC |
Bars and coins
Investment activity in China remained high. Physical delivery at the Shanghai Gold Exchange
totalled 836.7 tonnes in 2010, with 236.6 tonnes delivered during Q4. Moreover, physical delivery
as a percentage of trading volume had increased to 33% by the fourth quarter, as Chinese investors
sought to get hold of gold bullion. Anecdotal evidence suggests continuing strong demand for retail
investment products. Of note was the successful launch, on 16 December, of the Industrial and the
Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) gold accumulation plan (GAP) in Beijing. The new product, developed
in collaboration with the WGC, accumulated 11.5 tonnes during 2010 with more than one million
accounts opened.
Gold investment in other parts of Asia remained at a healthy pace. In Taiwan, the Bank of Taiwan
(BOT) reported that gold demand remained robust, mainly expressed through a 25% increase of Gold
Passbook sales, and a 35% increase of physical gold sales from year-earlier levels. In Vietnam,
retail investment demand remained very strong, and some estimates indicate gross purchases of 25
tonnes in Q4 alone, even as the gold price reached new record highs. In order to match the growing
demand for gold tael bars, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) increased gold import quotas by more
than 20 tonnes during the same period. This trend is likely to continue during the first part of
2011. One of the major reasons for this surge in retail investment demand was a high inflation rate
in 2010 (+11% YoY) and the steep devaluation of the Vietnamese dong versus the US dollar in the
same period. In India, initial reports suggest that gold medallions and bar sales were strong
during 2010 as a whole, and in particular in the fourth quarter, relative to the same period of the
previous year. Consequently, the Reserve Bank of India has authorised seven more banks to import
bullion. The WGC expects the impact of this measure to be visible during 2011. In general, Indian
investors are responding to strong economic growth coupled with a higher rate of inflation (e.g.
food inflation had grown to 18% by year-end) and are raising their allocation to gold to a
substantial share of their holdings. The experience in both Vietnam and India serves to demonstrate
how investors around the world are using gold for currency and inflation hedging against their own
currencies.
Private investor demand for bars and coins in Europe and North America also continued to grow
during 2010, in line with activity observed in other categories of investment demand. European and
American investors led the way in gold bar and coin buying for multiple purposes, including risk
protection and currency and/or inflation hedging. In the US, investors bought 1.2 million ounces
(38.0 tonnes) worth of American Eagle bullion coins, according to the US Mint, just shy of the
record 1.4 million ounces (44.3 tonnes) sold during 2009 (chart 7). While American Eagle sales in
Q4 2010 were still high on a historical basis, they only accounted for 8.3 tonnes, below the
previous 3-quarter average of 9.9 tonnes. Investors wishing to purchase gold coins or small bars
can find a list of retail dealers on our website at:
http://www.gold.org/investment/why_how_and_where/where_ to_invest/.
Chart 7: American Eagle bullion sales
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Total sales includes 1-, 1/2-, 1/4-, and 1/10th-ounce coin sales. |
|
Source: |
|
The United States Mint |
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Lease rates
The implied gold lease rate is the difference between the US Dollar LIBOR and the equivalent
duration Gold Forward Offered Rate (GOFO), the rate at which gold holders are willing to lend gold
in exchange for US Dollars (also known as the swap rate). Gold lease rates remained negative
throughout 2010, reaching an all-time low of -0.25% in the 3-month maturity on 15 December. Within
two days of this landmark, other maturities also reached all-time lows with the exception of the
longest maturity 12-month implied rate. Examining the components of the lease rates, both GOFO and
LIBOR at 3-month maturity moved in relative tandem until Q4 2010 when GOFO started to marginally
rise above LIBOR from about 0.35% to 0.50%. Although a rather insignificant move in magnitude, it
nonetheless sent the implied lease rate to its record lows (Chart 8).
However, the significance of the lease rate has declined as the two main market participants
gold producers and hedge funds have scaled back their activity over the last decade.
Furthermore, the growth in gold investment vehicles and futures volumes has likely shifted the
influence away from OTC forward agreements to exchange-based futures markets.
Nevertheless, negative lease rates do not necessarily suggest that lenders of gold, usually central
banks, are paying lessees, bullion banks. As gold leasing is an opaque, OTC market, it is difficult
to ascertain whether or not implied rates are reflective of the actual transacted rates.
Furthermore, central banks incur costs associated with storage, so lending gold at a low lease rate
perhaps even a periodically negative one, could still be advantageous. Such a transaction might
not provide a central bank with a gain, but would reduce their carrying costs. Suggestions that
this may be indicative of diminishing global storage capacity and with it, rising costs, are also
unfounded. In fact, new vaulting capacity has recently appeared both in Singapores Freeport area
and in Hong Kong.
One conclusion that can be drawn from the data, however, is that lease rates are very low and a
profitable leasing environment currently does not exist. As the leasing process will more often
than not involve the sale of physical gold in the spot market, to ensure a riskless hedge for
bullion banks, the current environment should also be supportive of the gold price.
Chart 8: Implied 3-month lease rate
Market and economic influences
A combination of macro-economic factors coupled with positive demand and supply dynamics ensured
gold remained a sought-after asset during 2010. Overall, mixed economic news around the world kept
investors looking for alternatives to balance risk and performance in their portfolios.
On the one hand, concerns continued to be felt over the economic health of growth in developed
countries, and market participants have sought to hedge various risks, including currency exposure
and systemic shocks. On the other hand, many developing countries, including China and India,
continue to grow which has led to strong demand for many commodities but also higher levels of
inflation.
Markets across Europe, where the sovereign debt crisis that started to make headlines in late 2009
became a cause for unprecedented intervention by the European Central Bank (ECB), started to
recover from the low levels experienced in Q2 2010. However, while Greece experienced problems
earlier in the year, news in Q4 of the worse-than-anticipated state of finances in Ireland
increased the risk of a contagion to other countries such as Portugal, Spain and, to some extent,
Italy back under the microscope. As such, European investors have turned to gold as a hedge against
currency risks.
After an initial recovery the US labour market remains subdued, the unemployment rate remains high
and while there was a temporary increase in government jobs, the full-time private sector has not
generated a corresponding increase in employment. Against this backdrop, the Federal Reserve
announced the second phase of quantitative easing (QE2) in November, with the potential to expand
its balance sheet by US$600 billion. This, in turn, had a positive impact on some risk assets,
including equities, and cyclical commodities such as oil and industrial metals (Chart 9). Also at
the same time, the prospect of higher levels of US debt and an extended period of record-low
interest rates pushed investors to make upward revisions in their inflation expectations.
Similarly, investors increased their bets on a long-term negative impact on the US dollar, not
necessarily against the euro or the pound, but certainly against most other G10 currencies, most
notably the Japanese yen, as well as those of many emerging markets, including the Chinese yuan
(Chart 10).
Emerging markets maintained a more positive tone during 2010. Equity markets in general had
positive returns of 14.4% in local currency and 18.8% in US dollar terms as economic growth
continued at a healthy pace. For example, the Chinese economy is estimated to have grown at around
9.8% in 2010 and is expected to grow 8.5% in 2011 according to the World Bank (Chart 11). However,
China has not escaped unscathed: headline inflation has been rising and the Peoples Bank of China
(PBoC) raised interest rates for both deposits and loans during the latter part of 2010 in order to
control it. That, coupled with a measured appreciation of the yuan against the US dollar, is likely
to decelerate Chinese growth moderately and thus should have a subsequent positive effect on gold.
Especially since Ministers of the PBoC, during the summer of 2010, announced a programme called
The Proposals for Promoting the Development of the Gold Market, a signal of the governments
commitment to further support growth in the gold market.
Similarly, Indias growth also remains resilient. Real GDP grew at 8.9% during the third quarter as
investment in infrastructure, exports, and industrial output continued to expand, and growth of
around 9.0% is expected in both 2010 and 2011. However, the rate of inflation remained high (food
prices were rising at an 18.0% pace by year-end), increasing the likelihood that interest rates
could be raised at the next central bank review meeting. Given the importance of both India and
China for the gold jewellery market (collectively,
equating to 45% of total global jewellery demand in 2009); economic recovery in these countries
tends to be accompanied by a positive outlook for gold. As the rupee and yuan slowly appreciate,
gold remains an effective and accessible savings vehicle. Moreover, investors can and will continue
to use gold to hedge against local inflationary pressures.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Chart 9: Performance of various assets classes in local currency (December 2010 YoY % change)
|
|
|
Source: |
|
Barclays Capital, MSCI Barra, WGC |
Chart 10: Gold (US$/oz) versus US trade-weighted dollar index
|
|
|
Source: |
|
London Bullion Market Association, Federal Reserve |
Chart 11: Chinese real GDP growth (%YoY) and CPI inflation (%YoY)
|
|
|
Source: |
|
National Bureau of Statistics, China Economic Information Net |
The shift in risk from the private to the public sector from 2007 to-date and its implications for
gold
The continuation of the European sovereign debt crisis during the last part of 2010 and its
potential spill-over to other markets has highlighted the prevalence of systemic risks which
investors now face. This, in turn, reinforces the need for market participants to finding
cost-effective strategies to preserve their capital. Historical analysis demonstrates that gold
plays a critical role in such strategies.
The global banking crisis that began to unfold in 2007 has placed a great burden on governments,
but especially in developed markets. Although some semblance of normality had returned by Q2 2009,
it became clear that a large number of insolvent financial institutions had been kept afloat by
governments fearful of systemic implications.
A sizeable portion of banks risky assets had been transferred from the private to the public purse
in exchange for credit lines leading increasing debate about the strain on the taxpayer and the
sustainability of public debt. Moreover, the unavoidable ensuing global recession added further
fiscal pain and stimulus packages and tax breaks contributed to deteriorating fiscal positions.
This, along with a lack of fiscal prudence and debt consolidation in many countries during the good
times, was also a driver of the risk shift from banks to governments, a shift which trended
steadily into 2010. This, in turn, has had and will continue to have implications for the gold
market. In particular, this type of systemic risk provides a strong rationale for investors, both
public and private to use gold as a currency and inflation hedge, a means of preserving capital and
protecting against tail-risk events.
CDS market for sovereign and corporate bonds in perspective
A witness to the shifting sands has been the global credit default swap (CDS) market. Being
primarily an over-the-counter market, it is more opaque than exchange-traded securities and
accessible only to sophisticated investors. Growth in this esoteric sector took off while the
crisis was in full swing. It is used by hedgers and speculators alike.
The total outstanding gross notional value of CDS contracts was over US$25 trillion in December
2010,2 representing approximately 30% of the value of the underlying bond
markets.3 Despite a pull-back from 2007 levels, the growth in CDS volumes has been
phenomenal over the last 10 years. However, the the absolute level is still considerably smaller
than the underlying bonds, especially for sovereign debt. Notwithstanding certain criticisms
levelled at CDS market, they can serve as a useful signal of market sentiment toward the underlying
instrument with regard to expectations of the likelihood of default or restructuring of
government-backed bonds.4
|
|
|
2 |
|
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC). |
|
3 |
|
ISDA.org. |
|
4 |
|
FT. Brussels gives sovereign CDS trading all-clear, FT.com, 6 December 2010. |
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Charting the risk shift
The increasing correlation between the default risk priced into sovereign bonds and their
respective major financial institutions in the issuing countries concerned is shown in Chart 12.
Prior to the second half of 2008, corporate CDS spreads and their underlying bond yields showed a
very low correlation as risks for individual institutions remained idiosyncratic. This began to
change as the financial crisis ensued and troubled assets were transferred from corporate balance
sheets onto government books and systemic risk became more prominent.
Such a shift is not unique to the most recent crisis, but a natural occurrence following a banking
crisis (most recently in Sweden in the early 1990s)5 as government assumed private
sector debt. However, the recent crisis has proved unique in its breadth and depth accompanied by
the threat of contagion.
The rising correlation between the CDS spreads of banks and sovereigns is indicative of the
increasing risk of default in the latter coupled with the fact that banks are substantial holders
of government debt. This trend is most noticeable among European nations. The issues in Greece and
Ireland have been well documented, and are now at risk of spilling over to Portugal, Spain and, to
some extent, Italy.
However, CDS spreads, and their correlation with banks spreads have increased almost universally
among developed nations, albeit with smaller incremental changes in the US and Japan. The benign
moves in the latter belie the fact that their fiscal positions are equally strained. The US, as the
global creditor of last resort can borrow in the worlds reserve currency and has seen buoyant
demand for its Treasury securities. Japan has seen similar demand from domestic investors. With
bond market volumes far in excess of CDS volumes, neither Japan nor the US has experienced a case
of the tail wagging the dog.
Chart 12: Rolling correlations between sovereign and financials CDS spreads (using daily log
changes)
|
|
|
* |
|
Average of Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Portugal. |
|
Source: MARKIT, Bloomberg, WGC |
|
5 |
|
Reinhart & Reinhart, After the Fall, NBER Working Paper, August 2010. |
The extent of the troubles for developed sovereign governments is further visible in Chart
13, which depicts the convergence of emerging market and developed market default risk.
In fact since December 2010, it has been cheaper to insure a basket of emerging market bonds than
a basket of European bonds.
The focus currently is on Europe, which faces distinctive challenges given the divergent economies
of the north and the south. Furthermore, the European Central Bank (ECB) has been reluctant to
engage in quantitative easing to the extent that the US, Japan and the UK have. Episodes of
political wrangling and discord have also slowed initiatives to deal with the crisis. In fact since
August 2010, as shown in Chart 14, CDS spreads have been higher on sovereign bonds than on
financial institutions. While this immediately conjures up the suggestion that a sovereign nation
in Europe may be bankrupt, this is not the case. Unlike corporate CDS, the type of sovereign
default that is priced in to a contract generally concerns restructuring. In other words, markets
are pricing in the increased probability that one or more European nations will restructure some or
all of its debt. Such an event, while not catastrophic would have severe implications for holders
of sovereign debt and for future issuance.
Implications for the gold market
The current shift has a number of potential implications for gold. First, the increasing risks
associated with government securities, as seen in CDS spreads, have been reflected by ratings
agencies enacting a series of downgrades on European sovereign debt, with others being put on
negative outlook. These downgrades can trigger a spiral of further deterioration. Government bonds
are held for their safe and reliable income streams. If volatility and implied risk-premia
increase, investors may have to turn elsewhere to park defensive capital. In this case, gold has a
long track record as an alternative vehicle for wealth preservation.
Second, currencies issued by these countries are also likely to suffer. The lack of fiscal
rectitude in many countries along with loose monetary policy is weighing heavily on developed
market currencies with the euro being most affected as the region tries to shake off its current
malaise. This, in turn, increases the potential demand for gold in its role as a currency-hedge.
Indeed, gold acts as global currency which is not affected by monetary or fiscal policies.
Third, uncertainty will likely not dissipate any time soon. While growth is looking promising in
some developed countries including the US, the building blocks of expansion are brittle as
unemployment remains high and structurally problematic, cost-push inflation is hurting the consumer
and housing markets remain anaemic.
Moreover, while the US seems to be coping better with the crisis relative to other countries with
similar circumstances, it also has fiscal and monetary policy issues it will have to face. Its
budget deficit is high and the quantitative easing measures implemented by the Federal Reserve have
put a long-term burden on the US dollar.
If growth does take hold, then inflation risks will increase. In many key gold markets, most
notably India, inflation is already seen as problematic. This poses a challenge for governments
and central banks wishing to withdraw liquidity without triggering another shock to the economy. In
this case, investors may also use gold in its capacity as an inflation hedge.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Chart 13: Developed market vs emerging market CDS spreads
Chart 14: European sovereign vs senior financial CDS indexes
Gold market trends
Please note that data on jewellery and industrial demand is released with a lag; the latest
data is as of Q3 2010. Data for the fourth quarter of 2010 will be released in mid-February 2011.
During 2010, the gold price performance was not only supported by strong investment activity,
but also by a consistent recovery in the jewellery sector and a normalisation of gold demand in
technological applications. Moreover, gold supply has not risen at the same pace as demand in part
due to a continuation in the declining trend of official sector sales. Indeed, for the first time
over the past two decades, the official sector is set to record net inflows during 2010.
Jewellery
Global jewellery demand totalled 1,468.2 tonnes during the first nine months of 2010,
increasing 18% from the same period during 2009. While the final data for Q4 2010 will be released
in mid-February 2011, current trends indicate that 2010 will see further normalisation in gold
jewellery consumption from the low levels experienced in 2009. Moreover, expressed in value terms,
jewellery demand totalled US$55.5 billion during the first three quarters of 2010, equal to the
US$55.5 billion spent globally on gold jewellery during the whole of 2009 (Chart 15). In other
words, consumers have increased their gold jewellery spending during 2010, despite the measured
appreciation in the gold price in multiple currencies. This is likely the product of two factors:
first, a continuation of economic growth and currency appreciation in key countries for the gold
market, including India, China and to some extent the Middle East; and second, a higher perception
of value for gold jewellery around the world, both as a luxury good as well as a store of wealth.
At the country level, India, the largest gold market, is poised to exhibit the strongest recovery
during 2010 (Chart 16). During the first nine months of 2010, gold jewellery consumption in India
rose to 513.5 tonnes, 73% higher than the same period during 2009, as consumers benefitted from
continued economic growth and periods of rupee appreciation against the US dollar. Similarly, gold
jewellery demand in Hong Kong, Russia, mainland China, and Saudi Arabia rose by 27%, 19%, 8% and 2%
respectively, during the first three quarters of 2010, from year-earlier levels. Indeed, China
the second largest gold market also benefitted from healthy growth and renewed interest in gold
consumption. While its 2010 performance so far has
been less strong than India, it is worth noting that China was the only market that did not
experience a contraction in
jewellery consumption during 2009. On the other hand, gold jewellery volume demand in the UAE,
Japan, Vietnam and Turkey was slightly lower during the first nine months of 2010, relative to
2009, while the rest of the world saw more significant contractions in jewellery consumption.
Notably, European demand had a volume drop of more than 15% in most markets, on the back of a
sluggish recovery and currency depreciation. Nevertheless, as with the overall jewellery market,
while volumes fell, the value of gold jewellery demand generally rose in most countries.
Preliminary reports on demand trends during Q4 2010 appear to follow a similar trend. In India, the
gold market was buoyant during the festive season (October November), especially around the
Hindu festival of Diwali, its biggest annual gold consumption event. Overall, anecdotal evidence
suggests Q4 2010 was better year-on-year, as consumers ramped up wedding-related jewellery
purchases in anticipation of further price appreciation. In other Asian markets, evidence also
suggests a positive trend, as jewellery consumption in Vietnam, whose wedding season reaches a high
during December, picked up despite a sharp depreciation in the Vietnamese dong.
In the US, the 8% YoY decline in the value of gold jewellery imports in September was indicative of
a desire among mass retailers to tightly manage their gold inventory levels in anticipation of the
holiday season, as the price trended higher into the end of the year. However, there was an
increase in sales of gold jewellery at the high-end (over US$1,000 per piece) as pent-up demand
among consumers with greater amounts of discretionary income was released. The WGC estimates that
high-end purchases could offset lower sales at middle and lower price points, leading to a slight
positive growth in value terms during Q4 2010 although volumes are still expected be down relative
to Q4 2009.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Chart 15: Jewellery demand in tonnes and US$ billions
Chart 16: Tonnage growth in jewellery demand by country (% 9M 2010 vs 9M 2009)
Technology
Gold demand for technological, industrial and dental applications continued to recover
during the first nine months of 2010, registering a 19% increase over the same period in 2009.
Electronics demand, which bore much of the brunt of the economic downturn in 2009, was the chief
driver of this rise, buoyed by ongoing inventory restocking and fresh demand for new technologies.
The consumer electronics segment, which dominates industrial demand for gold, registered another
robust rise in the first part of 2010, a clear indication that the industry is continuing to
recover from the recession-led losses sustained in early 2009. It rose by 26% in the first three
quarters to 221.8 tonnes, close to the 238.4-tonne level observed in the same period during 2008
(Chart 17). Demand for semiconductors (produced using gold bonding wire) has continued to rise,
with numbers boosted by sales of personal computers, mobile devices and corporations upgrading
their information technology systems, plus a modest rise in demand from the automotive industry.
Much of this growth has been led by the developing world, in particular China and India. Finally,
gold used in dental applications, which accounts for about 10% of technological and other
industrial application demand, declined by a further 6% YoY during the first nine months of 2010 to
a new record low, as substitution by alternatives, such as ceramics and base metals, continued to
erode the use of gold in this segment.
Preliminary reports on Q4 2010 activity indicate that the positive trend of last year in
electronics demand remains quite strong. Moreover, predictions from major semiconductor players are
bullish for 2011. While some manufacturers have been reducing gold coating thicknesses on contacts
and connectors the second major use in electronics to lower costs, anecdotal evidence
suggests some component failures have helped limit the practice.
Please note that data on mine production and recycled gold is released with a lag; the latest data
is as of Q3 2010. Data for the fourth quarter of 2010 will be released in mid-February 2011.
Mine production and recycled gold
Total gold supply including mine production, recycled gold and official sector
transactions totalled 2,993.3 tonnes during the first nine months of 2010, a 3.1% decline from
the same period during 2009. However, mine production increased by 2.6% to 1,954.2 tonnes in the
first three quarters, from 1,903.7 tonnes in the same period a year earlier as a raft of new
operations either came online or ramped up production (Chart 18). While Q4 data will be published
in mid-February 2011, based on the first three quarters of the year, 2010 is set to mark the second
consecutive annual increase in gold production, and it could reach levels previously seen at the
beginning of the decade.
Australian production significantly contributed to the increase in output as high grades of ore at
Newmonts Boddington mine boosted production. Further positive contributions came from Mexico,
where Agnico Eagle ramped up its Pinos Altos operation, and Argentina and the US, with Barricks
continued expansion of its Valadero mine, and higher than expected grades from Cortez Hills.
Offsetting the impact of these developments was a decline in production in Peru and Indonesia.
Net producer de-hedging continued to act as a slight constraint on supply, although at 84.6 tonnes
in the first three quarters of 2010 this was below the 127.5 tonnes recorded during the
year-earlier period. While estimates on hedging activity in Q4 are not yet final, the outstanding
global hedge book was reduced to around 65.0 tonnes, following the elimination of the AngloGold
Ashanti hedge book in early October of 2010. These moves to unwind their hedge books have enabled
miners to sell gold at market prices.
While gold prices continued to trend up in 2010, recycling activity during the nine months ending
September 2010 declined by 2.7% to 1,234.8 from 1,268.8 on year-earlier levels. This has been
partly driven by continued economic growth in emerging economies, and especially in India and China
which substantially contribute to recycled gold supply. However, recycling activity remains high on
a long-term basis, especially among Western consumers who have gradually seen a rising trend in
recycling. This, coupled with higher price levels ensured that profit-taking on recycled gold in
Western markets was marginally higher than year-earlier levels. Similarly, Middle East and Asian
markets also witnessed a consistent supply of recycled gold during 2010. There is some evidence
however, that near-market supplies
in these traditional markets are becoming exhausted and that a fresh surge in the gold price would
be required to generate another significant wave of selling-back.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Chart 17: Industrial demand by category in tonnes
Chart 18: Mine production and recycled gold supply in tonnes
The official sector
On 21 December, 2010, the IMF announced the conclusion of its limited gold sales programme
covering the sale of 403.3 tonnes of gold that was approved by its Executive Board in September
of 2009. The proceeds of this programme will be used to set up an endowment fund, the income from
which will finance the regular research and monitoring work of the IMF. In addition, some of the
proceeds will be used to support low-income countries.
The IMF conducted the majority of its sales in off-market transactions at market prices with
central banks, selling 200 tonnes to the Reserve Bank of India, 10 tonnes to the Central Bank of
Sri Lanka, 10 tonnes to the Central Bank of Bangladesh and 2 tonnes to the Central Bank of
Mauritius. The remaining sales were conducted through on-market sales within the ceiling set by the
third Central Bank Gold Agreement CBGA3. The ease with which the IMF conducted its sales over the
past year and the negligible impact they have had on the gold market are a testament to the depth
and breadth of the global gold market.
The Central Bank of the Russian Federation bought an additional 9 tonnes of gold in November, after
purchasing 19 tonnes in October. In total, Russias gold reserves increased by 131 tonnes in the
first ten months of 2010 to 784 tonnes. With these additional purchases, Russia has now surpassed
Japan in gold reserves and is ranked eighth in the world for gold reserves (Table 4).
Finally, Venezuela reported an increase in gold reserves in November of 2 tonnes, which is
understood to be continued buying of domestic production along the same lines as earlier in the
year.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Table 4: Top 40 official gold holdings as in IFS January 2011*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
|
% of reserves** |
|
1 United States |
|
|
8,133.5 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
% |
2 Germany |
|
|
3,401.8 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
% |
3 IMF |
|
|
2,827.2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
4 Italy |
|
|
2,451.8 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
% |
5 France |
|
|
2,435.4 |
|
|
|
67.2 |
% |
6 China |
|
|
1,054.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
7 Switzerland |
|
|
1,040.1 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
8 Russia |
|
|
784.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
9 Japan |
|
|
765.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
10 Netherlands |
|
|
612.5 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
% |
11 India |
|
|
557.7 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
12 ECB |
|
|
501.4 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
% |
13 Taiwan |
|
|
423.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
14 Portugal |
|
|
382.5 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
% |
15 Venezuela |
|
|
365.8 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
% |
16 Saudi Arabia |
|
|
322.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
17 United Kingdom |
|
|
310.3 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
18 Lebanon |
|
|
286.8 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
19 Spain |
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
% |
20 Austria |
|
|
280.0 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
% |
21 Belgium |
|
|
227.5 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
% |
22 Algeria |
|
|
173.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
23 Philippines |
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
24 Libya |
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
25 Singapore |
|
|
127.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
26 Sweden |
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
27 South Africa |
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
28 BIS 2 |
|
|
120.0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
29 Turkey |
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
30 Greece |
|
|
111.7 |
|
|
|
79.6 |
% |
31 Romania |
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
32 Poland |
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
33 Thailand |
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
34 Australia |
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
35 Kuwait |
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
36 Egypt |
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
37 Indonesia |
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
38 Kazakhstan |
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
39 Denmark |
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
40 Pakistan |
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
This table was updated in December 2010 and reports data available at that time. Data is taken
from the International Monetary Funds International Financial Statistics (IFS), December 2010
edition, and other sources where applicable. IFS data is two months in arrears, so holdings are as
of October 2010 for most countries, September 2010 or earlier for late reporters. The table does
not list all gold holders: countries which have not reported their gold holdings to the IMF in the
last six months are not included, while other countries are known to hold gold but they do not
report their holdings publicly. Where the WGC knows of movements that
are not reported to the IMF or misprints, changes have been made. The countries showing as having
0.0 tonnes of gold report some gold but less than 0.05 tonnes to the IMF. |
|
** |
|
The percentage share held in gold of total foreign reserves, as calculated by the World Gold
Council. The value of gold holdings is calculated using the end of October gold price of $1,346.75
per troy ounce (there are 32,151 troy ounces in a metric tonne). Data for the value of other
reserves is taken from IFS, table Total Reserves minus Gold. |
|
1 |
|
BIS and IMF balance sheets do not allow this percentage to be calculated. In the case of any
countries, up-to-date data for other reserves is not available. |
|
2 |
|
BIS data is updated each year from the BISs annual report to reflect the Banks gold investment
assets excluding any gold held in connection with swap operations, under which the Bank exchanges
currencies for physical gold. The bank has an obligation to return the gold at the end of the
contract. |
|
Source: IMF, national data, WGC |
Key data
Table 5: Demand (cumulative Q4 2009Q3 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
|
% QOQ1 |
|
|
% YOY1 |
|
|
Value ($bn) |
|
|
% YOY1 |
|
Jewellery |
|
|
1,978.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
73,581 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
Identifiable investment |
|
|
1,281.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
-16.0 |
% |
|
|
48,148 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
of which ETFs and similar products |
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
-1.0 |
% |
|
|
-41.0 |
% |
|
|
14,799 |
|
|
|
-22.0 |
% |
Industrial and dental |
|
|
424.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
% |
Table 6: Supply (cumulative Q4 2009Q3 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
|
% QOQ1 |
|
|
% YOY1 |
|
|
Value ($bn) |
|
|
% YOY1 |
|
Mining output |
|
|
2,629.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
98,023 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Net producer hedging |
|
|
-209.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-7,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mine supply |
|
|
2,420.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
90,346 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
% |
Official sales |
|
|
-124.0 |
|
|
|
-10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled gold |
|
|
1,638.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
-1.0 |
% |
|
|
61,133 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
% |
Table 7: Gold price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2010 |
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
Gold (US$/oz); London PM fix average |
|
|
1,109.12 |
|
|
|
1,196.74 |
|
|
|
1,226.75 |
|
|
|
1,366.78 |
|
% QOQ |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
% YOY |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
|
Source: The London Bullion Market Association, WGC |
Table 8: Volatility2 (%) to end-September 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-month |
|
|
3-month |
|
|
6-month |
|
|
1-year |
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
Source: The London Bullion Market Association, WGC |
Table 9: Market capitalisation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value (US$ bn) |
|
Above ground stocks of gold3 |
|
|
7,277.0 |
|
ETFs (as at 30 September 2010)4 |
|
|
97.9 |
|
Notional value of net long non-commercial and non-reportable positions as reported by CFTC gold futures (at 30 September 2010) |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
Source: GFMS, LBMA, CFTC, WGC |
|
1 |
|
Quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year % change in rolling four-quarter totals. |
|
2 |
|
Annualised daily return volatility. |
|
3 |
|
Based on 2009 volume and Q4 2010 average gold price. |
|
4 |
|
Data: www.exchangetradedgold.com; www.etfsecurities.com; www.ishares.com; Zurich Kantonalbank;
Finans Portföy; www.Deutsche-Boerse.com; www.juliusbaer.com. |
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
Table 10: Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ UBS |
|
|
Brent |
|
|
Dow Jones/ |
|
|
Trade- |
|
|
|
Gold |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCI World |
|
|
Comodity |
|
|
crude oil |
|
|
Wilshire |
|
|
weighted |
|
|
|
(US$/oz) |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
ex-US |
|
|
Index |
|
|
(US$/bbl) |
|
|
REITs Index |
|
|
US$ |
|
1-month |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
-1.8 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
-2.1 |
% |
3-month |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
-2.6 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
-0.4 |
% |
6-month |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
-7.1 |
% |
1-year |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
Volatility* (1-year) |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised daily return volatility. |
Source: Global Insight, Barclays Capital, WGC; performance calculations based on total return
indices unless not applicable
Table 11: Correlations (3 years ending 24 December 2010, weekly returns)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-weighted |
|
|
Brent crude oil |
|
|
S&P GS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ UBS |
|
|
BarCap 1-3 |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
BarCap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ/ Wilshire |
|
|
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
US dollar |
|
|
(US$/bbl |
|
|
Commodity Index |
|
|
R/J CRB Index |
|
|
Commodity Index |
|
|
month T-bills |
|
|
Treasury Index |
|
|
Credit Index |
|
|
US High Yield Index |
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Russell 3000 |
|
|
MSCI World ex-US |
|
|
REITs Index |
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-weighted US dollar |
|
|
-0.44 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent crude oil (US$/bbl) |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
-0.49 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P GS Commodity Index |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
-0.58 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R/J CRB Index |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
-0.62 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ UBS Commodity Index |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
-0.63 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap 1-3 month T-bills |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
-0.06 |
|
|
|
-0.07 |
|
|
|
-0.12 |
|
|
|
-0.14 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US Treasury Index |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
-0.01 |
|
|
|
-0.34 |
|
|
|
-0.34 |
|
|
|
-0.33 |
|
|
|
-0.30 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US Credit Index |
|
|
-0.08 |
|
|
|
-0.22 |
|
|
|
-0.09 |
|
|
|
-0.03 |
|
|
|
-0.01 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
-0.08 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US High Yield Index |
|
|
-0.07 |
|
|
|
-0.40 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
-0.26 |
|
|
|
-0.27 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
-0.02 |
|
|
|
-0.47 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
-0.20 |
|
|
|
-0.40 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ Industrial Average |
|
|
-0.06 |
|
|
|
-0.42 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
-0.17 |
|
|
|
-0.40 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell 3000 |
|
|
-0.01 |
|
|
|
-0.48 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
-0.20 |
|
|
|
-0.41 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCI World ex-US |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
-0.73 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
-0.24 |
|
|
|
-0.29 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
DJ/ Wilshire REITs Index |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
-0.35 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
-0.02 |
|
|
|
-0.36 |
|
|
|
-0.02 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Source: Global Insight, Barclays Capital, WGC; performance calculations based on total return
indices unless not applicable
Disclaimers
This report is published by the World Gold Council
(WGC), 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG, United
Kingdom. Copyright © 2011. All rights reserved. This
report is the property of WGC and is protected by US
and international laws of copyright, trademark and
other intellectual property laws. This report is
provided solely for general information and
educational purposes. The information in this report
is based upon information generally available to the
public from sources believed to be reliable. WGC does
not undertake to update or advise of changes to the
information in this report. Expression of opinion are
those of the author and are subject to change without
notice. The information in this report is provided as
an as is basis. WGC makes no express or implied
representation or warranty of any kind concerning the
information in this report, including, without
limitation, (i) any representation or warranty of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or
use, or (ii) any representation or warranty as to
accuracy, completeness, reliability or timeliness.
Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event
will WGC or its affiliates be liable for any decision
made or action taken in reliance on the information in
this report and, in any event, WGC and its affiliates
shall not be liable for any consequential, special,
punitive, incidental, indirect or similar damages
arising from, related or connected with this report,
even if notified of the possibility of such damages.
No part of this report may be copied, reproduced,
republished, sold, distributed, transmitted,
circulated, modified, displayed or otherwise used
for any purpose whatsoever, including, without
limitation, as a basis for preparing derivative
works, without the prior written authorisation of
WGC. To request such authorisation, contact
research@gold.org. In no event may WGC trademarks,
artwork or other proprietary elements in this report
be reproduced separately from the textual content
associated with them; use of these may be requested
from info@gold.org. This report is not, and should
not be construed as, an offer to buy or sell, or as a
solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, gold, any
gold related products or any other products,
securities or investments. This report does not, and
should not be construed as acting to, sponsor,
advocate, endorse or promote gold, any gold related
products or any other products, securities or
investments.
This report does not purport to make any
recommendations or provide any investment or other
advice with respect to the purchase, sale or other
disposition of gold, any gold related products or any
other products, securities or investments, including,
without limitation, any advice to the effect that any
gold related transaction is appropriate for any
investment objective or financial situation of a
prospective investor. A decision to invest in gold, any
gold related products or any other products, securities
or investments should not be made in reliance on any of
the statements in this report. Before making any
investment decision, prospective investors should seek
advice from their financial advisers, take into account
their individual financial needs and circumstances and
carefully consider the risks associated with such
investment decision.
Gold Investment Digest | Fourth quarter and full year 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
The printer is accredited to
ISO14001 environmental standard |
I013201101 |
World Gold Council
10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG
United Kingdom
|
|
|
E
|
|
investment@gold.org |
T
|
|
+44 20 7826 4700 |
F
|
|
+44 20 7826 4799 |
W
|
|
www.gold.org |
Published: January 2011
SPDR® GOLD TRUST has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC
for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the
prospectus in that registration statement and other documents the issuer has filed with the SEC for
more complete information about the Trust and this offering. You may get these documents for free
by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, the Trust or any Authorized
Participant will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling toll free at
1-866-320-4053 or contacting State Street Global Markets, LLC, One Lincoln Street, Attn: SPDR®
Gold Shares, 30th Floor, Boston, MA 02111.