e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Commission File Number: 001-34084
POPULAR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specifies in its charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0667416 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
Popular Center Building
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue
Hato Rey, Puerto Rico
|
|
00918 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(787) 765-9800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if change since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: Common Stock $0.01 par value 1,023,553,365 shares outstanding as of
May 2, 2011.
POPULAR, INC.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
Forward-Looking Information
The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
may relate to Popular, Incs (the Corporation, Popular, we, us, our) financial condition,
results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not
limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency
trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital
adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that
are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words anticipate, believe,
continues, expect, estimate, intend, project and similar expressions and future or
conditional verbs such as will, would, should, could, might, can, may, or similar
expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.
Various factors, some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the
Dodd-Frank Act) on our businesses, business practices and cost of operations; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory approvals that may be necessary to undertake certain actions or consummate
strategic transactions such as acquisitions and dispositions; |
|
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) assessments; and |
|
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. |
Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from
those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic
conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job market, consumer
confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing
assets, charge-offs and provision expense; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may
reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate and distribute
financial products in the primary and secondary markets; adverse movements and volatility in debt
and equity capital markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value
of financial assets and liabilities; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory
investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations; increased competition;
our ability to grow its core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise
change our business mix; and managements ability to identify and manage these and other risks.
Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,
is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of
regulators, judges and juries. Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as well as Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a
discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available
to the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including
the requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any
such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances
after the date of such statements.
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
464,555 |
|
|
$ |
452,373 |
|
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
200,185 |
|
|
|
165,851 |
|
|
|
304,109 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
761,380 |
|
|
|
797,334 |
|
|
|
700,644 |
|
|
Total money market investments |
|
|
961,565 |
|
|
|
979,295 |
|
|
|
1,004,753 |
|
|
Trading account securities, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
587,218 |
|
|
|
492,183 |
|
|
|
346,819 |
|
Other trading securities |
|
|
47,581 |
|
|
|
54,530 |
|
|
|
33,330 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
2,105,783 |
|
|
|
2,031,123 |
|
|
|
2,193,615 |
|
Other investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3,580,558 |
|
|
|
3,205,729 |
|
|
|
4,342,131 |
|
Investment
securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value at
March 31, 2011 - $147,816;
December 31, 2010 - $120,873; March 31, 2010 - $207,850) |
|
|
142,106 |
|
|
|
122,354 |
|
|
|
209,596 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value at
March 31, 2011 - $176,336; December 31, 2010 - $165,233; March 31, 2010 $158,375) |
|
|
174,930 |
|
|
|
163,513 |
|
|
|
156,864 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
569,678 |
|
|
|
893,938 |
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
20,781,549 |
|
|
|
20,834,276 |
|
|
|
23,189,598 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
4,729,550 |
|
|
|
4,836,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
104,760 |
|
|
|
106,241 |
|
|
|
111,299 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
736,505 |
|
|
|
793,225 |
|
|
|
1,277,036 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
24,669,834 |
|
|
|
24,771,692 |
|
|
|
21,801,263 |
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
2,325,618 |
|
|
|
2,311,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
543,577 |
|
|
|
545,453 |
|
|
|
579,451 |
|
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
156,888 |
|
|
|
161,496 |
|
|
|
134,887 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
65,562 |
|
|
|
57,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
147,670 |
|
|
|
150,658 |
|
|
|
131,243 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
167,416 |
|
|
|
166,907 |
|
|
|
173,359 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,321,900 |
|
|
|
1,456,073 |
|
|
|
1,380,428 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
647,387 |
|
|
|
647,387 |
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
56,441 |
|
|
|
58,696 |
|
|
|
41,762 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
38,736,267 |
|
|
$ |
38,722,962 |
|
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
4,913,009 |
|
|
$ |
4,939,321 |
|
|
$ |
4,476,255 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
22,283,665 |
|
|
|
21,822,879 |
|
|
|
20,884,057 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
27,196,674 |
|
|
|
26,762,200 |
|
|
|
25,360,312 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,642,800 |
|
|
|
2,412,550 |
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
290,302 |
|
|
|
364,222 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,794,655 |
|
|
|
4,170,183 |
|
|
|
2,529,092 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,006,930 |
|
|
|
1,213,276 |
|
|
|
941,063 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
34,931,361 |
|
|
|
34,922,431 |
|
|
|
31,345,236 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See note 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding in all
periods presented (aggregated liquidation preference value of $50,160) |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,700,000,000 shares authorized (December 31, 2010
1,700,000,000; March 31, 2010 700,000,000) ; 1,023,628,492 shares issued at March 31,
2011 (December 31, 2010 1,022,929,158; March 31, 2010 639,544,895) and 1,023,416,118
outstanding at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 1,022,727,802; March 31, 2010
639,539,900) |
|
|
10,236 |
|
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
4,096,245 |
|
|
|
4,094,005 |
|
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(338,126 |
) |
|
|
(347,328 |
) |
|
|
(377,807 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 212,374 shares at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 201,356
shares; March 31, 2010 4,995 shares) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income net of tax of ($57,044)(December 31, 2010 ($55,616);
March 31, 2010 ($29,809)) |
|
|
(13,002 |
) |
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
3,804,906 |
|
|
|
3,800,531 |
|
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
38,736,267 |
|
|
$ |
38,722,962 |
|
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
423,375 |
|
|
$ |
354,649 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
52,375 |
|
|
|
64,926 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
485,451 |
|
|
|
427,195 |
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
76,879 |
|
|
|
92,974 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
14,015 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
51,198 |
|
|
|
50,045 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
142,092 |
|
|
|
158,278 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
343,359 |
|
|
|
268,917 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
268,040 |
|
|
|
28,717 |
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
45,630 |
|
|
|
50,578 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
58,652 |
|
|
|
101,320 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Trading account loss |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
7,244 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold |
|
|
(9,848 |
) |
|
|
(17,290 |
) |
FDIC loss share income |
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
7,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
39,409 |
|
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
164,368 |
|
|
|
157,866 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
84,611 |
|
|
|
95,873 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
21,529 |
|
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
106,140 |
|
|
|
120,932 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
24,586 |
|
|
|
28,876 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
23,453 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
11,972 |
|
|
|
12,304 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
46,688 |
|
|
|
27,049 |
|
Communications |
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
8,295 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
17,673 |
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
8,239 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
4,703 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
24,245 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
275,049 |
|
|
|
280,913 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
157,359 |
|
|
|
(94,330 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
147,227 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Stock |
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share Basic |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
($0.13 |
) |
|
Dividends Declared per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
treasury stock |
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,380 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
($292,752 |
) |
|
|
($29,209 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538,817 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
Common stock purchases |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
6,379 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
($377,807 |
) |
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
$ |
2,487,201 |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,655 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,094,005 |
|
|
|
($347,328 |
) |
|
|
($5,961 |
) |
|
$ |
3,800,531 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,132 |
|
Issuance of stock |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
Dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(930 |
) |
Common stock purchases |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,041 |
) |
|
|
(7,041 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
9,629 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,096,245 |
|
|
|
($338,126 |
) |
|
|
($13,002 |
) |
|
$ |
3,804,906 |
|
|
Disclosure of changes in number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,000 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
Conversion of stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,150,000) |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
Common Stock Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
1,022,929,158 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
699,334 |
|
|
|
50,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock upon conversion of preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,333,333 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
|
1,023,628,492 |
|
|
|
1,022,929,158 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(212,374 |
) |
|
|
(201,356 |
) |
|
|
(4,995 |
) |
|
Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
1,023,416,118 |
|
|
|
1,022,727,802 |
|
|
|
639,539,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Issuance of 46,000,000 in depositary shares; converted into 383,333,333 common shares (full
conversion of depositary shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in shares of
contingent convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
6
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
Other
comprehensive (loss) income before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
954 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
10,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
(19,978 |
) |
|
|
36,111 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income before tax: |
|
|
(8,469 |
) |
|
|
37,595 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
(4,155 |
) |
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(7,041 |
) |
|
|
33,440 |
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
$ |
3,091 |
|
|
|
($51,615 |
) |
|
Tax
effect allocated to each component of other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
($893 |
) |
|
|
($883 |
) |
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
(3,748 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
Income tax
benefit (expense) |
|
$ |
1,428 |
|
|
|
($4,155 |
) |
|
Disclosure
of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
($26,658 |
) |
|
|
($36,151 |
) |
|
|
($39,722 |
) |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
(207,933 |
) |
|
|
(210,935 |
) |
|
|
(126,036 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
79,962 |
|
|
|
80,855 |
|
|
|
47,683 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(127,971 |
) |
|
|
(130,080 |
) |
|
|
(78,353 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
164,596 |
|
|
|
184,574 |
|
|
|
140,211 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(22,933 |
) |
|
|
(24,874 |
) |
|
|
(17,886 |
) |
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
141,663 |
|
|
|
159,700 |
|
|
|
122,325 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
($13,002 |
) |
|
|
($5,961 |
) |
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
7
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
12,060 |
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
Impairment losses on net assets to be disposed of |
|
|
8,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
6,171 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of premiums and deferred fees |
|
|
(88,327 |
) |
|
|
12,966 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
(7,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FDIC loss share income |
|
|
(13,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FDIC deposit insurance expense |
|
|
17,673 |
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
Net gain on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(6,826 |
) |
|
|
(7,716 |
) |
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
(16,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(184,641 |
) |
|
|
(166,868 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(90,780 |
) |
|
|
(59,436 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
45,448 |
|
|
|
21,654 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
206,222 |
|
|
|
221,975 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
Net increase in other assets |
|
|
(4,019 |
) |
|
|
(9,726 |
) |
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
|
(16,357 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
140,915 |
|
|
|
(20,168 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in pension and other postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
(123,957 |
) |
|
|
1,097 |
|
Net decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(38,203 |
) |
|
|
(5,983 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(60,388 |
) |
|
|
250,199 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(50,256 |
) |
|
|
165,144 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
17,730 |
|
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(752,479 |
) |
|
|
(208,004 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(51,998 |
) |
|
|
(31,844 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(38,305 |
) |
|
|
(8,191 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
278,274 |
|
|
|
373,676 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
27,335 |
|
|
|
35,229 |
|
Other |
|
|
27,050 |
|
|
|
15,476 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
427,622 |
|
|
|
398,734 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
200,387 |
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
(348,226 |
) |
|
|
(39,611 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
|
31,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(18,599 |
) |
|
|
(15,049 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
7,763 |
|
|
|
6,707 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
44,648 |
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(148,113 |
) |
|
|
564,265 |
|
|
8
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
433,505 |
|
|
|
(564,592 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and assets
sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
230,250 |
|
|
|
(141,284 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(73,920 |
) |
|
|
15,937 |
|
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(622,568 |
) |
|
|
(124,624 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
242,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
210,551 |
|
|
|
(814,564 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
(85,155 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
452,373 |
|
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
464,555 |
|
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
10
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries (the Corporation). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. In accordance with the consolidation guidance for variable interest
entities, the Corporation would also consolidate any variable interest entities (VIEs) for which
it has a controlling financial interest and therefore is the primary beneficiary. Assets held in a
fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Corporation and, accordingly, are not included in the
consolidated statements of condition. The results of operations of companies or assets acquired are
included only from the dates of acquisition.
Unconsolidated investments, in which there is at least 20% ownership, are generally accounted for
by the equity method. These investments are included in other assets and the Corporations
proportionate share of income or loss is included in other operating income. Investments, in which
there is less than 20% ownership, are generally carried under the cost method of accounting, unless
significant influence is exercised. Under the cost method, the Corporation recognizes income when
dividends are received. Limited partnerships are accounted for by the equity method unless the
Corporations interest is so minor that it may have virtually no influence over partnership
operating and financial policies.
Statutory business trusts that are wholly-owned by the Corporation and are issuers of trust
preferred securities are not consolidated in the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation sold certain residential mortgage loans of
Banco Popular North America that were reclassified from held-in-portfolio to held-for-sale in
December 2010. The loans were sold at a better price than the price used to determine their fair
value at the time of reclassification to the held-for-sale category. At the time of sale, the
Corporation classified $13.8 million of the impact of the better price as a recovery of the
original write-down which was booked as part of the activity in the allowance for loan losses.
This included an out of period adjustment of $10.7 million since a portion of the sale was
completed just prior to the release of the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010. After evaluating the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the misstatement and the out of period adjustment, management has determined that they are not material to the prior year financial statements and the current period, respectively. As part of the evaluation,
management considered the fact that the quarters net income was impacted by a one-time adjustment of $103.3
million in income tax expense that resulted from a reduction in the
Corporations net deferred tax asset due to a change in the marginal corporate income tax rate for Puerto Rico subsidiaries as described in Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The consolidated
statement of condition data at December 31, 2010 was derived from audited financial statements. The
unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of the
results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal recurring
nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2010 consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements to conform with the 2011 presentation.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2010, included in the Corporations Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2011 (the 2010
Annual Report). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Nature of Operations
The Corporation is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the
supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation
has operations in Puerto Rico, the continental United States, and the U.S. and British Virgin
Islands. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through
its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and
equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance
services through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco
Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts
and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York,
California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for
the benefit of BPNA. As part of the rebranding of the BPNA franchise,
11
some of its branches operate under a new name, Popular Community Bank. Note 30 to the consolidated
financial statements presents information about the Corporations business segments. The
Corporation has a 49% interest in EVERTEC, which provides transaction processing services
throughout the Caribbean and Latin America.
Two major transactions effected in 2010 contribute to various significant changes in the
Corporations financial results for the periods presented in these financial statements. First, on
April 30, 2010, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits and liabilities of
Westernbank Puerto Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
FDIC). The transaction is referred to herein as the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements and to the Corporations 2010 Annual
Report for information on this business combination. Assets subject to loss sharing agreements with
the FDIC, including loans and other real estate owned, are labeled covered on the consolidated
statements of condition and applicable notes to the consolidated financial statements. Loans
acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for credit cards, and other real
estate owned are considered covered because the Corporation will be reimbursed for 80% of any
future losses on these assets subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Second, on
September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, including the
Corporations merchant acquiring and processing and technology businesses (the EVERTEC
transaction). The Corporation continues to hold the remaining 49% ownership interest in Carib
Holdings (referred to as EVERTEC). Refer to the Corporations 2010 Annual Report for a
description of the transaction. EVERTEC continues to service many of the Corporations
subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing businesses. Refer to Note 4 to
these consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations investment in EVERTEC,
including related party transactions.
Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements:
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) -
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. Effective this quarter, it also requires the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances
and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also
clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that
disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and
non-recurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 has been effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2010. This guidance impacts disclosures only and has not had an effect on the Corporations
consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about
fair value measurements are presented in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-28, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to
Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying
Amounts (ASU 2010-28)
The amendments in ASU 2010-28, issued in December 2010, modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an
entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill
impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors
indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing
guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the
amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance
did not have an impact on the Corporations consolidated statement of condition or results of
operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of
Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29)
The FASB issued ASU 2010-29 in December 2010. The amendments in ASU 2010-29 affect any public
entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate
basis. This ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the
entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro
forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro
forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro
12
forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and did not have an impact on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditors Determination of
Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (ASU 2011-02)
The FASB issued ASU 2011-02 in April 2011. This ASU clarifies which loan modifications constitute
troubled debt restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a
modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt
restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of troubled
debt restructurings.
The new guidance will require creditors to evaluate modifications and restructurings of receivables
using a more principles-based approach. This Update clarifies the existing guidance on whether (1)
the creditor has granted a concession and (2) whether the debtor is experiencing financial
difficulties. Specifically this Update (1) provides additional guidance on determining whether a
creditor has granted a concession, including guidance on collection of all amounts due, receipt of
additional collateral or guarantees from the debtor, and restructuring the debt at a below-market
rate; (2) includes examples for creditors to determine whether an insignificant delay in payment is
considered a concession; (3) prohibits creditors from using the borrowers effective rate test in
ASC Subtopic 470-50 to evaluate whether a concession has been granted to the borrower; (4) adds
factors for creditors to use to determine whether the debtor is experiencing financial
difficulties; and (5) ends the deferral of the additional disclosures about TDR activities required
by ASU 2010-20 and requires public companies to begin providing these disclosures in the period of
adoption.
For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or
after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the
beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early application is permitted. For purposes of measuring
impairment for receivables that are newly considered impaired under the new guidance, an entity
should apply the amendments prospectively in the first period of adoption and disclose the total
amount of receivables and the allowance for credit losses as of the end of the period of adoption.
The Corporation is evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of
Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements (ASU 2011-03)
The FASB issued ASU 2011-03 in April 2011. The amendment of this ASU affects all entities that
enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to
repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The ASU modifies the criteria for
determining when these transactions would be accounted for as financings (secured
borrowings/lending agreements) as opposed to sales (purchases) with commitments to repurchase
(resell). This ASU does not affect other transfers of financial assets. ASC Topic 860 prescribes
when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to
repo agreements. That determination is based, in part, on whether the entity has maintained
effective control over transferred financial assets.
Specifically, the amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the
criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets
on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2)
eliminates the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund
substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets.
The new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December
15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing
transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early application is not permitted.
The Corporation will be evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance
will have on its consolidated financial statements.
13
Note 3 Business Combination:
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction
As indicated in Note 1 to these consolidated financial statements, on April 30, 2010, the
Corporations Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, BPPR, acquired certain assets and assumed certain
deposits and liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico from the FDIC, as receiver for Westernbank.
The following table presents the fair values of major classes of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed by the Corporation at the acquisition date. The Corporation recorded goodwill
of $87 million at acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value prior to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As recorded by |
|
|
|
purchase accounting |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Popular, Inc. on |
|
(In thousands) |
|
adjustments |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
consideration |
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and
money market investments |
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
58,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,610 |
|
Loans |
|
|
8,554,744 |
|
|
|
($3,354,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200,457 |
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,337,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,337,748 |
|
Covered other real estate owned |
|
|
125,947 |
|
|
|
(73,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,080 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
Receivable from FDIC (associated to the note issued to
the FDIC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
|
111,101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,926 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,841 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,142,359 |
|
|
|
($979,150 |
) |
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
$ |
8,274,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,380,170 |
|
|
$ |
11,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,391,635 |
|
Note issued to the FDIC (including a premium
of $12,411 resulting from the fair value adjustment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,770,495 |
|
|
|
5,770,495 |
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,755 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
2,394,095 |
|
|
$ |
57,220 |
|
|
$ |
5,822,995 |
|
|
$ |
8,274,310 |
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2010, retrospective adjustments were made to the estimated fair
values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction to reflect new information obtained during the measurement period (as defined by ASC
Topic 805), about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known,
would have affected the acquisition-date fair value measurements. The retrospective adjustments
were mostly driven by refinements in credit loss assumptions because of new information that became
available. The revisions principally resulted in a decrease in the estimated credit losses, thus
increasing the fair value of acquired loans and reducing the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
The fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to refinement
for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing
date fair values becomes available, and thus, the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease.
14
The following table presents the principal changes in fair value as previously reported in Form
10-Qs filed during 2010 and the revised amounts recorded during the measurement period with general
explanations of the major changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
As recasted [a] |
|
|
reported [b] |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
8,554,744 |
|
|
$ |
8,554,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
(3,354,287 |
) |
|
|
(4,293,756 |
) |
|
$ |
939,469 |
|
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
5,200,457 |
|
|
|
4,260,988 |
|
|
|
939,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
2,337,748 |
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
|
|
(984,813 |
) |
|
|
[d] |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
86,841 |
|
|
|
106,230 |
|
|
|
(19,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
649,264 |
|
|
|
670,419 |
|
|
|
(21,155 |
) |
|
|
[e] |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,274,310 |
|
|
$ |
8,360,198 |
|
|
|
($85,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,391,635 |
|
|
$ |
2,391,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note issued to the FDIC |
|
|
5,770,495 |
|
|
|
5,769,696 |
|
|
$ |
799 |
|
|
|
[f] |
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments |
|
|
45,755 |
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
|
|
(86,687 |
) |
|
|
[g] |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
8,274,310 |
|
|
$ |
8,360,198 |
|
|
|
($85,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
[a] Amounts reported include retrospective adjustments during the measurement period (ASC Topic 805) related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[b] Amounts are presented as previously reported.
[c] Represents the increase in managements best estimate of fair value mainly driven by lower expected future credit losses on the acquired loan portfolio based on facts and
circumstances existent as of the acquisition date but known to management during the measurement period. The main factors that influenced the revised estimated credit losses
included review of collateral, revised appraised values, and review of borrowers payment capacity in more thorough due diligence procedures.
[d] This reduction is directly influenced by the reduction in estimated future credit losses as they are substantially covered by the FDIC under the 80% FDIC loss sharing
agreements. The FDIC loss share indemnification asset decreased in a greater proportion than the reduction in the loan portfolio estimated future credit losses because of the
true-up provision of the loss sharing agreement. As part of the agreement with the FDIC, the Corporation has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC in the event losses on the
loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels as determined under the criteria stipulated in the agreements. The true-up payment represents an estimated liability of $169
million for the recasted estimates, compared to an estimated liability of $50 million in the original reported estimates. This estimated liability is accounted for as part of the
indemnification asset.
[e] Represents revisions to acquisition date estimated fair values of other real estate properties based on new appraisals obtained.
[f] Represents an increase in the premium on the note issued to the FDIC, also influenced by the cash flow streams impacted by the revised loan payment estimates.
[g] Reduction due to revised credit loss estimates and commitments.
The recasting did not impact financial results for the previously reported quarter ended
March 31, 2010 as the acquisition was effected on April 30, 2010.
15
The following table depicts the principal changes in the consolidated statement of operations as
a result of the recasting for retrospective adjustments for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As recasted |
|
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As recasted |
|
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
314,595 |
|
|
$ |
278,976 |
|
|
$ |
35,619 |
|
|
$ |
356,778 |
|
|
$ |
386,918 |
|
|
|
($30,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
202,258 |
|
|
|
202,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
112,337 |
|
|
|
76,718 |
|
|
|
35,619 |
|
|
|
141,765 |
|
|
|
171,905 |
|
|
|
(30,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
198,827 |
|
|
|
215,858 |
|
|
|
(17,031 |
) |
|
|
825,894 |
|
|
|
796,524 |
|
|
|
29,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
328,416 |
|
|
|
328,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,541 |
|
|
|
371,547 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax |
|
|
(17,252 |
) |
|
|
(35,840 |
) |
|
|
18,588 |
|
|
|
596,118 |
|
|
|
596,882 |
|
|
|
(764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
27,237 |
|
|
|
19,988 |
|
|
|
7,249 |
|
|
|
102,032 |
|
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($44,489 |
) |
|
|
($55,828 |
) |
|
$ |
11,339 |
|
|
$ |
494,086 |
|
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($408 |
) |
|
Note 4 Related Party Transactions with Affiliated Company:
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% majority interest in EVERTEC and
retained a 49% ownership interest. Refer to the Corporations 2010 Annual Report for details on
this sale to an unrelated third-party.
The Corporations investment in EVERTEC, which is accounted for under the equity method, amounted
to $203 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $197 million), and is included as part of
other assets in the consolidated statement of condition. The Corporations proportionate share of
income or loss from EVERTEC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of
operations since October 1, 2010. The Corporation recognized a $1.9 million loss in other operating
income for the period from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 as part of its equity method
investment in EVERTEC, which consisted of $11.8 million of the Corporations share in EVERTECs net
income, partially offset by $13.7 million of intercompany income eliminations (investor-investee
transactions at 49%). The unfavorable impact of the elimination in other operating income was
offset by the elimination of 49% of the professional fees (expense) paid by the Corporation to
EVERTEC during the same period. The Corporation did not receive any distributions from EVERTEC
during the period from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011.
The following table presents the impact on the Corporations results of operations of transactions
between the Corporation and EVERTEC (as an affiliate) for the period from January 1, 2011 through
March 31, 2011. Items that represent expenses to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.
For consolidation purposes, the Corporation eliminates 49% of the income (expense) between EVERTEC
and the Corporation from the corresponding categories in the consolidated statement of operations
and the net effect of all items at 49% is eliminated against other operating income, which is the
category used to record the Corporations share of income (loss) as part of its equity method
investment in EVERTEC. The 51% majority interest in the table that follows represents the share of
transactions with the affiliate that is not eliminated in the consolidation of the Corporations
results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
100% |
|
|
51% majority interest |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Interest income on loan to EVERTEC |
|
$ |
1,056 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
Interest income |
Interest income on investment securities issued by EVERTEC |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
Interest income |
Interest expense on deposits |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC |
|
|
6,793 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
Other service fees |
Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC |
|
|
(38,678 |
) |
|
|
(19,726 |
) |
|
Professional fees |
Rental income charged to EVERTEC |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
Net occupancy |
Transition services provided to EVERTEC |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
Other operating expenses |
16
The Corporation had the following financial condition accounts outstanding with EVERTEC at
March 31, 2011. The 51% majority interest in the tables that follow represents the share of
transactions with the affiliate that is not eliminated in the consolidation of the Corporations
statement of condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
100% |
|
|
51% majority interest |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
57,459 |
|
|
$ |
29,304 |
|
|
Loans |
Investment securities |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
Investment securities |
Deposits |
|
|
50,846 |
|
|
|
25,932 |
|
|
Deposits |
Accounts receivables |
|
|
3,709 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
Other assets |
Accounts payable |
|
|
17,078 |
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
100% |
|
|
51% majority interest |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
58,126 |
|
|
$ |
29,644 |
|
|
Loans |
Investment securities |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
Investment securities |
Deposits |
|
|
38,761 |
|
|
|
19,768 |
|
|
Deposits |
Accounts receivables |
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
Other assets |
Accounts payable |
|
|
17,416 |
|
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
Prior to the EVERTEC sale transaction on September 30, 2010, EVERTEC had certain performance
bonds outstanding, which were guaranteed by the Corporation under a general indemnity agreement
between the Corporation and the insurance companies issuing the bonds. The Corporation agreed to
maintain, for a 5-year period following September 30, 2010, the guarantee of the performance bonds.
The EVERTECs performance bonds guaranteed by the Corporation
amounted to approximately $10.4
million at March 31, 2011. Also, EVERTEC had an existing letter of credit issued by BPPR, for an
amount of $2.9 million. As part of the merger agreement, the Corporation also agreed to maintain
outstanding this letter of credit for a 5-year period. EVERTEC and the Corporation entered into a
Reimbursement Agreement, in which EVERTEC will reimburse the Corporation for any losses incurred by
the Corporation in connection with the performance bonds and the letter of credit. Possible losses
resulting from these agreements are considered insignificant.
Furthermore, under the terms of the sale of EVERTEC, the Corporation was required for a period of
twelve months following September 30, 2010 to sell its equity interests in Serfinsa and Consorcio
de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A (CONTADO) to EVERTEC, subject to complying with certain rights of
first refusal in favor of the Serfinsa and CONTADO shareholders. During the quarter ended March 31,
2011, the Corporation sold its equity interest in CONTADO to CONTADO shareholders and EVERTEC and
recognized a gain of $16.7 million, net of tax, upon the sale. The Corporations investment in
CONTADO, accounted for under the equity method, amounted to $16 million at December 31, 2010. The
Corporation continues to hold the equity investment in Serfinsa, which book value approximated $340
thousand at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $1.8 million).
Note 5 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities:
The Corporations subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to
maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or other banks. Those
required average reserve balances were approximately $843 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31,
2010 $835 million; March 31, 2010 $753 million). Cash and due from banks, as well as other
short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center Law, at March 31, 2011, December 31,
2010 and March 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained separately for its two international banking
entities (IBEs), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally split for the two IBEs, which were
considered restricted assets.
At March 31, 2010, as part of a line of credit facility with a financial institution, the
Corporation was required to have restricted cash of $1 million as collateral for the line of
credit. This restriction expired in July 2010.
At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash
of $5 million to support a letter of credit. The cash is being held in an interest-bearing money
market account.
17
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $1 million
that represents funds deposited in an escrow account which are guaranteeing possible liens or
encumbrances over the title and insured properties.
At
March 31, 2011, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $14 million to comply with the
requirements of the credit card networks (December 31, 2010 $12 million).
Note 6 Pledged Assets:
Certain securities, loans and other real estate owned were pledged to secure public and trust
deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities
available, derivative positions, loan servicing agreements and the loss sharing agreements with the
FDIC. The classification and carrying amount of the Corporations pledged assets, in which the
secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
1,529,464 |
|
|
$ |
1,867,249 |
|
|
$ |
1,873,545 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
49,734 |
|
|
|
25,770 |
|
|
|
125,770 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC |
|
|
4,634,499 |
|
|
|
4,787,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
9,897,243 |
|
|
|
9,695,200 |
|
|
|
8,374,460 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
65,562 |
|
|
|
57,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pledged assets |
|
$ |
16,179,140 |
|
|
$ |
16,435,648 |
|
|
$ |
10,376,282 |
|
|
Pledged securities and loans that the creditor has the right by custom or contract to repledge
are presented separately on the consolidated statements of condition.
At March 31, 2011, investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity totaling $1.0
billion, and loans of $0.7 billion, served as collateral to secure public funds (December 31, 2010
$1.3 billion and $0.5 million, respectively; March 31, 2010 $1.5 billion of investment
securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity).
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York (FHLB) and from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed). At March 31, 2011,
the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the FHLB
aggregating $1.7 billion (December 31, 2010 $1.6 billion; March 31, 2010 $1.9 billion). Refer
to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for borrowings outstanding under these credit
facilities. At March 31, 2011, the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized
by $3.7 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2010 $3.8 billion; March 31, 2010 $3.2
billion in loans-held-in portfolio and investment securities available-for-sale). Also, the
Corporations banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of $2.8
billion (December 31, 2010 $2.7 billion; March 31, 2010 $3.4 billion), which remained unused as
of such date. The amount available under this credit facility is dependent upon the balance of
loans and securities pledged as collateral. At March 31, 2011, the credit facilities with the Fed
discount window were collateralized by $5.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2010
$5.4 billion; March 31, 2010 $5.2 billion). These pledged assets are included in the above table
and were not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statement of condition at
March 31, 2011.
Loans held-in-portfolio and other real estate owned that are covered by loss sharing
agreements with the FDIC amounting to $4.7 billion at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $4.8
billion), serve as collateral to secure the note issued to the FDIC. Refer to Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements for descriptive information on the note issued to the FDIC.
18
Note 7 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale:
The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate
fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities
available-for-sale at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
7,003 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,101 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
28,505 |
|
|
|
2,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,581 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
35,508 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,682 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
230,290 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
|
230,275 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,005,737 |
|
|
|
45,685 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,051,330 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
179,482 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,416,027 |
|
|
|
46,591 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
1,461,087 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
10,357 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,367 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,753 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16,002 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
20,765 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
20,633 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
52,380 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
52,569 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
91,067 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
91,221 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,487,274 |
|
|
|
28,001 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
1,514,264 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,580,113 |
|
|
|
29,108 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
1,607,345 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
8,109 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
73,612 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4,547 |
|
|
|
69,116 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
81,721 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
77,148 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
13,444 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13,959 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
164,579 |
|
|
|
10,230 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
174,801 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,143,295 |
|
|
|
81,696 |
|
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
2,224,024 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
Total mortgage backed securities |
|
|
2,321,951 |
|
|
|
92,496 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
2,413,468 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
Equity securities (without contractual maturity) |
|
|
8,722 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
9,434 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,213 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
Total other |
|
|
25,323 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
27,608 |
|
|
|
8.82 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5,521,745 |
|
|
$ |
174,126 |
|
|
$ |
9,530 |
|
|
$ |
5,686,341 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
7,001 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,123 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
28,676 |
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,013 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
35,677 |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,136 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
153,738 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,781 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,000,955 |
|
|
|
53,681 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
|
1,053,975 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,156,205 |
|
|
|
55,760 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
1,211,304 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
10,404 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,423 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,853 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
16,127 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
20,765 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
20,614 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
5.28 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
52,527 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
52,702 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
107,186 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
107,757 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,096,271 |
|
|
|
32,248 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,128,508 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,205,380 |
|
|
|
33,861 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,238,294 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
10,208 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
10,081 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
79,311 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
74,857 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
89,519 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
4,690 |
|
|
|
84,938 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,738 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16,384 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
170,662 |
|
|
|
10,580 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
181,239 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,289,210 |
|
|
|
86,870 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
2,375,448 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
Total mortgage backed securities |
|
|
2,478,593 |
|
|
|
98,200 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
2,576,155 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
Equity securities (without contractual maturity) |
|
|
8,722 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
9,475 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,112 |
|
|
|
10.98 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
7,736 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
Total other |
|
|
25,655 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
25,848 |
|
|
|
8.74 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5,052,278 |
|
|
$ |
191,899 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
5,236,852 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
% |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
56,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
56,686 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
% |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
29,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,542 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
85,960 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
87,228 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
338,331 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,348 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,247,333 |
|
|
|
59,077 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,306,025 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,285 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,886 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,604 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,640,362 |
|
|
|
65,285 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
1,705,262 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,166 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
22,218 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,909 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
48,574 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
80,920 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
|
|
78,748 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
5,232 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
111,222 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
113,002 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,335,392 |
|
|
|
25,982 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
1,359,126 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,451,846 |
|
|
|
28,047 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
1,477,531 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
18,757 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
18,203 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
98,289 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
7,330 |
|
|
|
91,146 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
117,046 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
109,349 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
25,679 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,035 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,885 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23,508 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
194,798 |
|
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
205,612 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,767,080 |
|
|
|
49,182 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
2,813,357 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,010,442 |
|
|
|
60,984 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
3,068,512 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,959 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,395,535 |
|
|
$ |
156,870 |
|
|
$ |
16,659 |
|
|
$ |
6,535,746 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
The weighted average yield on investment securities available-for-sale is based on amortized
cost; therefore, it does not give effect to changes in fair value.
Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity.
The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and
certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject
to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.
There were no securities sold during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
21
The following table presents the Corporations fair value and gross unrealized losses of
investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
304,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
304,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,531 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
18,138 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
18,439 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
345,887 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,887 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
21,678 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
46,424 |
|
|
|
4,385 |
|
|
|
68,102 |
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
35,010 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
9,185 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
44,195 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,798 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,395 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
735,986 |
|
|
$ |
4,787 |
|
|
$ |
55,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,743 |
|
|
$ |
791,947 |
|
|
$ |
9,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
24,284 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,284 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
19,357 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
19,660 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
40,212 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
42,717 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
21,231 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
52,302 |
|
|
|
4,398 |
|
|
|
73,533 |
|
|
|
4,690 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
33,261 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
9,257 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
42,518 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,736 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,736 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
146,084 |
|
|
$ |
2,594 |
|
|
$ |
64,410 |
|
|
$ |
4,731 |
|
|
$ |
210,494 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
56,686 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,686 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities |
|
|
104,722 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,722 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
41,420 |
|
|
$ |
2,589 |
|
|
|
51,649 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
179,958 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
177,065 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
357,023 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
91,374 |
|
|
|
7,892 |
|
|
|
91,578 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
631,327 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
634,518 |
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
986,418 |
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
$ |
316,994 |
|
|
$ |
11,786 |
|
|
$ |
1,303,412 |
|
|
$ |
16,659 |
|
|
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the
value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to
22
earnings is recognized for
anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired, the excess of the securitys carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is
accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to
consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition
of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt
security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a
rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a
geographic area, and (7) managements intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely
than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted
recovery occurs.
At March 31, 2011, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an
unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual
debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. At March 31, 2011, the
Corporation did not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it
is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior
to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Also, management evaluated the Corporations portfolio
of equity securities at March 31, 2011. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation
did not record any other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities. Management has the
intent and ability to hold the investments in equity securities that are at a loss position at
March 31, 2011 for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or
beyond) the cost of these investments.
The unrealized losses associated with Collateralized mortgage obligations private label are
primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. In addition to verifying the
credit ratings for the private-label CMOs, management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan
collateral for these bonds. Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO,
including among others, the weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and
foreclosure rates of the underlying assets in the securities. At March 31, 2011, there were no
sub-prime securities in the Corporations private-label CMOs portfolios. For private-label CMOs
with unrealized losses at March 31, 2011, credit impairment was assessed using a cash flow model
that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral
and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and
distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction
structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow
model incorporates actual cash flows through the current period and then projects the expected cash
flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, loss severity and prepayment rates.
Managements assessment also considered tests using more stressful parameters. Based on the
assessments, management concluded that the tranches of the private-label CMOs held by the
Corporation were not other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011, thus management expects to
recover the amortized cost basis of the securities.
The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of
the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in
which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders equity. This
information excludes securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and
agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other
than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
1,029,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,057,977 |
|
|
$ |
757,812 |
|
|
$ |
789,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,043,826 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,275 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
1,003,317 |
|
|
|
1,047,747 |
|
|
|
1,003,395 |
|
|
|
1,056,549 |
|
|
|
1,379,524 |
|
|
|
1,441,839 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
977,365 |
|
|
|
993,342 |
|
|
|
637,644 |
|
|
|
654,495 |
|
|
|
816,939 |
|
|
|
833,476 |
|
|
23
Note 8 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:
The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate
fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities
held-to-maturity at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
24,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,734 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
24,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,734 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,973 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,329 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
18,340 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
|
18,170 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
54,154 |
|
|
|
6,695 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
59,524 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
90,702 |
|
|
|
7,175 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
96,288 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations private label
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
25,250 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,383 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
Total other |
|
|
26,500 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,633 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
142,106 |
|
|
$ |
7,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,598 |
|
|
$ |
147,816 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
25,872 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
25,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25,872 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,529 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,862 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,594 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
17,441 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
56,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
55,053 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
91,975 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
90,512 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations private label
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,080 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
Total other |
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
122,354 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
$ |
120,873 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
25,778 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
25,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
25,778 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,137 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,820 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,251 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,808 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
17,527 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
46,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
44,144 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
180,788 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
179,059 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
Total other |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
209,596 |
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
2,275 |
|
|
$ |
207,850 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage
obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of
collateralized mortgage obligations and certain other securities may differ from their contractual
maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.
The following table presents the Corporations fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment
securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010
and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
26,407 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
30,808 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
57,215 |
|
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
26,407 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
30,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,031 |
|
|
$ |
57,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
unrealized Losses |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,872 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,872 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
51,995 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
52,768 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
78,110 |
|
|
$ |
1,923 |
|
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
79,049 |
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Gross |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
unrealized Losses |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,778 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,778 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
23,186 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
$ |
33,066 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
|
56,252 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
48,964 |
|
|
$ |
1,534 |
|
|
$ |
33,269 |
|
|
$ |
741 |
|
|
$ |
82,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,275 |
|
|
As indicated in Note 7 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates
investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis.
The Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions classified as held-to-maturity
at March 31, 2011 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto Rico
and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs periodic credit
quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value at March 31, 2011 was attributable to
changes in interest rates and not credit quality, thus no other-than-temporary decline in value was
necessary to be recorded in these held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011,
the Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more
likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment securities prior to
recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Note 9 Loans:
Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction acquired loans are significantly different from those loans not covered under the FDIC
loss sharing agreements. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing
agreements as covered loans in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC
loss sharing agreements as non-covered loans.
For a summary of the accounting policy related to loans and allowance for loan losses refer to the
summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements included in the Corporations 2010 Annual Report.
The following tables present the composition of loans held-in-portfolio (HIP) at March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered loans at |
|
|
Covered loans at |
|
|
Total loans HIP at |
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
6,881,089 |
|
|
$ |
2,403,395 |
|
|
$ |
9,284,484 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
4,243,242 |
|
|
|
305,735 |
|
|
|
4,548,977 |
|
Construction |
|
|
439,399 |
|
|
|
621,187 |
|
|
|
1,060,586 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
4,895,697 |
|
|
|
1,247,476 |
|
|
|
6,143,173 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
693,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
693,506 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
1,107,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,107,437 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
614,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614,753 |
|
Personal |
|
|
1,156,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,156,512 |
|
Auto |
|
|
505,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,242 |
|
Other |
|
|
244,672 |
|
|
|
151,757 |
|
|
|
396,429 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio [a] |
|
$ |
20,781,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,729,550 |
|
|
$ |
25,511,099 |
|
|
[a] Loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2011 exclude $105 million in unearned income and $570 million in loans held-for-sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered loans at |
|
|
Covered loans at |
|
|
Total loans HIP at |
|
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
7,006,676 |
|
|
$ |
2,463,549 |
|
|
$ |
9,470,225 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
4,386,809 |
|
|
|
303,632 |
|
|
|
4,690,441 |
|
Construction |
|
|
500,851 |
|
|
|
640,492 |
|
|
|
1,141,343 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
4,524,748 |
|
|
|
1,259,459 |
|
|
|
5,784,207 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
705,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705,776 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
1,132,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,132,308 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
503,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503,761 |
|
Personal |
|
|
1,236,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236,068 |
|
Auto |
|
|
568,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568,360 |
|
Other |
|
|
268,919 |
|
|
|
169,750 |
|
|
|
438,669 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio [a] |
|
$ |
20,834,276 |
|
|
$ |
4,836,882 |
|
|
$ |
25,671,158 |
|
|
[a] Loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2010 exclude $106 million in unearned income and $894 million in loans held-for-sale.
The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (LHFS) at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 by main loan categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
61,276 |
|
|
$ |
60,528 |
|
Construction |
|
|
392,113 |
|
|
|
412,744 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
116,289 |
|
|
|
420,666 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
569,678 |
|
|
$ |
893,938 |
|
|
26
Non-covered loans
The following tables present non-covered loans held-in-portfolio that are in non-performing status
and accruing loans past due 90 days or more by loan class at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more consist primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA and other
insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporations financial
statements pursuant to GNMAs buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA
mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the
option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option.
Also, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include certain residential conventional loans
purchased from other financial institutions that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received
timely payment from the sellers / servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under
recourse agreements. However, residential conventional loans purchased from other financial
institutions, which are in the process of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage
loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
USA |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans past due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans past |
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
loans past due |
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
90 days or |
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
due 90 days |
|
(In thousands) |
|
loans |
|
|
90 days or more |
|
|
loans |
|
|
more |
|
|
loans |
|
|
or more |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
364,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
178,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
542,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
162,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
57,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
573,011 |
|
|
$ |
289,325 |
|
|
|
26,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,361 |
|
|
$ |
289,325 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,117 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
21,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
Total [a] |
|
$ |
1,196,927 |
|
|
$ |
320,783 |
|
|
$ |
438,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,635,140 |
|
|
$ |
320,783 |
|
|
[a] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $465 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
USA |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans past due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans past due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans past |
|
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
90 days or |
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
90 days or |
|
|
Non-accrual |
|
|
due 90 days |
|
(In thousands) |
|
loans |
|
|
more |
|
|
loans |
|
|
more |
|
|
loans |
|
|
or more |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
370,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
182,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
553,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
114,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
64,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
518,446 |
|
|
$ |
292,387 |
|
|
|
23,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542,033 |
|
|
$ |
292,387 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,514 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Personal |
|
|
22,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,892 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
Total [a] |
|
$ |
1,111,503 |
|
|
$ |
327,343 |
|
|
$ |
460,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,571,853 |
|
|
$ |
327,343 |
|
|
[a] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $672 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
27
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, non-covered loans held-in-portfolio on which the
accrual of interest income had been discontinued amounted to $1.6 billion. Non-accruing loans at
March 31, 2011 include $54 million (December 31, 2010 $60 million) in consumer loans.
The following tables present loans by past due status at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 for
non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (net of unearned income).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held- |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-portfolio |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
80,014 |
|
|
$ |
7,787 |
|
|
$ |
364,037 |
|
|
$ |
451,838 |
|
|
$ |
3,178,648 |
|
|
$ |
3,630,486 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
110,536 |
|
|
|
16,017 |
|
|
|
162,893 |
|
|
|
289,446 |
|
|
|
2,742,654 |
|
|
|
3,032,100 |
|
Construction |
|
|
8,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,176 |
|
|
|
65,291 |
|
|
|
83,998 |
|
|
|
149,289 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
231,741 |
|
|
|
46,424 |
|
|
|
862,336 |
|
|
|
1,140,501 |
|
|
|
2,890,679 |
|
|
|
4,031,180 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
11,523 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
18,727 |
|
|
|
547,154 |
|
|
|
565,881 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
14,316 |
|
|
|
10,859 |
|
|
|
30,117 |
|
|
|
55,292 |
|
|
|
1,038,644 |
|
|
|
1,093,936 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
22,717 |
|
|
|
23,656 |
|
Personal |
|
|
19,092 |
|
|
|
11,906 |
|
|
|
21,737 |
|
|
|
52,735 |
|
|
|
944,834 |
|
|
|
997,569 |
|
Auto |
|
|
21,417 |
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
31,231 |
|
|
|
467,818 |
|
|
|
499,049 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
14,072 |
|
|
|
224,573 |
|
|
|
238,645 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
500,612 |
|
|
$ |
101,750 |
|
|
$ |
1,517,710 |
|
|
$ |
2,120,072 |
|
|
$ |
12,141,719 |
|
|
$ |
14,261,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
USA |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held- |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-portfolio |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
USA |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
107,661 |
|
|
$ |
4,434 |
|
|
$ |
178,755 |
|
|
$ |
290,850 |
|
|
$ |
2,959,753 |
|
|
$ |
3,250,603 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
30,213 |
|
|
|
10,496 |
|
|
|
46,653 |
|
|
|
87,362 |
|
|
|
1,123,780 |
|
|
|
1,211,142 |
|
Construction |
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,983 |
|
|
|
171,423 |
|
|
|
118,687 |
|
|
|
290,110 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
45,801 |
|
|
|
7,226 |
|
|
|
26,350 |
|
|
|
79,377 |
|
|
|
785,125 |
|
|
|
864,502 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
25,158 |
|
|
|
26,210 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
12,961 |
|
|
|
13,501 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
7,124 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
17,431 |
|
|
|
29,252 |
|
|
|
561,839 |
|
|
|
591,091 |
|
Personal |
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
150,109 |
|
|
|
158,943 |
|
Auto |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
Other |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
202,895 |
|
|
$ |
28,616 |
|
|
$ |
438,213 |
|
|
$ |
669,724 |
|
|
$ |
5,745,274 |
|
|
$ |
6,414,998 |
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held- |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-portfolio |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
187,675 |
|
|
$ |
12,221 |
|
|
$ |
542,792 |
|
|
$ |
742,688 |
|
|
$ |
6,138,401 |
|
|
$ |
6,881,089 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
140,749 |
|
|
|
26,513 |
|
|
|
209,546 |
|
|
|
376,808 |
|
|
|
3,866,434 |
|
|
|
4,243,242 |
|
Construction |
|
|
12,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,159 |
|
|
|
236,714 |
|
|
|
202,685 |
|
|
|
439,399 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
277,542 |
|
|
|
53,650 |
|
|
|
888,686 |
|
|
|
1,219,878 |
|
|
|
3,675,804 |
|
|
|
4,895,682 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
19,779 |
|
|
|
572,312 |
|
|
|
592,091 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
14,575 |
|
|
|
11,140 |
|
|
|
30,117 |
|
|
|
55,832 |
|
|
|
1,051,605 |
|
|
|
1,107,437 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
7,303 |
|
|
|
4,947 |
|
|
|
17,941 |
|
|
|
30,191 |
|
|
|
584,556 |
|
|
|
614,747 |
|
Personal |
|
|
25,686 |
|
|
|
13,118 |
|
|
|
22,765 |
|
|
|
61,569 |
|
|
|
1,094,943 |
|
|
|
1,156,512 |
|
Auto |
|
|
21,549 |
|
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
31,492 |
|
|
|
473,746 |
|
|
|
505,238 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,692 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
9,637 |
|
|
|
14,845 |
|
|
|
226,507 |
|
|
|
241,352 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
703,507 |
|
|
$ |
130,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,955,923 |
|
|
$ |
2,789,796 |
|
|
$ |
17,886,993 |
|
|
$ |
20,676,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held- |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-portfolio |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
47,064 |
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
$ |
370,677 |
|
|
$ |
443,288 |
|
|
$ |
3,412,310 |
|
|
$ |
3,855,598 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
34,703 |
|
|
|
23,695 |
|
|
|
114,792 |
|
|
|
173,190 |
|
|
|
2,688,228 |
|
|
|
2,861,418 |
|
Construction |
|
|
6,356 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
64,678 |
|
|
|
74,034 |
|
|
|
94,322 |
|
|
|
168,356 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
188,468 |
|
|
|
83,789 |
|
|
|
810,833 |
|
|
|
1,083,090 |
|
|
|
2,566,610 |
|
|
|
3,649,700 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
10,737 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
5,674 |
|
|
|
18,685 |
|
|
|
554,102 |
|
|
|
572,787 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
16,073 |
|
|
|
12,758 |
|
|
|
33,514 |
|
|
|
62,345 |
|
|
|
1,054,081 |
|
|
|
1,116,426 |
|
Personal |
|
|
21,004 |
|
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
22,816 |
|
|
|
55,650 |
|
|
|
965,610 |
|
|
|
1,021,260 |
|
Auto |
|
|
22,076 |
|
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
34,905 |
|
|
|
459,745 |
|
|
|
494,650 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
13,451 |
|
|
|
252,048 |
|
|
|
265,499 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
350,280 |
|
|
$ |
169,512 |
|
|
$ |
1,438,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,958,638 |
|
|
|
12,047,056 |
|
|
$ |
14,005,694 |
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
USA |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held- |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-portfolio |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
USA |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
68,903 |
|
|
$ |
10,322 |
|
|
$ |
182,456 |
|
|
$ |
261,681 |
|
|
$ |
2,889,397 |
|
|
$ |
3,151,078 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
30,372 |
|
|
|
15,079 |
|
|
|
57,102 |
|
|
|
102,553 |
|
|
|
1,422,838 |
|
|
|
1,525,391 |
|
Construction |
|
|
30,105 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
173,876 |
|
|
|
204,273 |
|
|
|
128,222 |
|
|
|
332,495 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
38,550 |
|
|
|
12,751 |
|
|
|
23,587 |
|
|
|
74,888 |
|
|
|
800,134 |
|
|
|
875,022 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
28,711 |
|
|
|
30,206 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
15,182 |
|
|
|
15,882 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
6,116 |
|
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
17,562 |
|
|
|
30,551 |
|
|
|
537,802 |
|
|
|
568,353 |
|
Personal |
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
5,369 |
|
|
|
13,617 |
|
|
|
201,190 |
|
|
|
214,807 |
|
Auto |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
8,499 |
|
|
|
9,107 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
181,331 |
|
|
$ |
48,685 |
|
|
$ |
460,350 |
|
|
$ |
690,366 |
|
|
$ |
6,031,975 |
|
|
$ |
6,722,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held- |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in-portfolio |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
115,967 |
|
|
$ |
35,869 |
|
|
$ |
553,133 |
|
|
$ |
704,969 |
|
|
$ |
6,301,707 |
|
|
$ |
7,006,676 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
65,075 |
|
|
|
38,774 |
|
|
|
171,894 |
|
|
|
275,743 |
|
|
|
4,111,066 |
|
|
|
4,386,809 |
|
Construction |
|
|
36,461 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
238,554 |
|
|
|
278,307 |
|
|
|
222,544 |
|
|
|
500,851 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
227,018 |
|
|
|
96,540 |
|
|
|
834,420 |
|
|
|
1,157,978 |
|
|
|
3,366,744 |
|
|
|
4,524,722 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
11,745 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
5,937 |
|
|
|
20,180 |
|
|
|
582,813 |
|
|
|
602,993 |
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit cards |
|
|
16,416 |
|
|
|
13,115 |
|
|
|
33,514 |
|
|
|
63,045 |
|
|
|
1,069,263 |
|
|
|
1,132,308 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
6,116 |
|
|
|
6,873 |
|
|
|
17,562 |
|
|
|
30,551 |
|
|
|
537,802 |
|
|
|
568,353 |
|
Personal |
|
|
26,563 |
|
|
|
14,519 |
|
|
|
28,185 |
|
|
|
69,267 |
|
|
|
1,166,800 |
|
|
|
1,236,067 |
|
Auto |
|
|
22,451 |
|
|
|
5,399 |
|
|
|
7,663 |
|
|
|
35,513 |
|
|
|
468,244 |
|
|
|
503,757 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
13,451 |
|
|
|
252,048 |
|
|
|
265,499 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
531,611 |
|
|
$ |
218,197 |
|
|
$ |
1,899,196 |
|
|
$ |
2,649,004 |
|
|
$ |
18,079,031 |
|
|
$ |
20,728,035 |
|
|
Covered loans
Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit
with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic
310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar
characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest
rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have
an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of
cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation measures additional losses for this portfolio
when it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at
acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates
after acquisition. Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20,
which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in
excess of the Corporations initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income. Loans
accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in
accordance with the Corporations non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is
discontinued.
30
The following table presents covered loans in non-performing status and accruing loans past due 90
days or more by loan class at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
90 days or more |
|
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
due 90 days or more |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
6,065 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
14,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
6,146 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
10,635 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Construction |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
6,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,648 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total [a] |
|
$ |
13,513 |
|
|
$ |
11,610 |
|
|
$ |
25,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,016 |
|
|
[a] Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be
performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining
life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.
The following tables present loans by past-due status at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
for covered loans held-in-portfolio (net of unearned income). The information considers covered
loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Covered Loans |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
90 Days |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans held-in- |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
138,542 |
|
|
$ |
55,144 |
|
|
$ |
475,774 |
|
|
$ |
669,460 |
|
|
$ |
1,733,935 |
|
|
$ |
2,403,395 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
6,429 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
24,353 |
|
|
|
35,137 |
|
|
|
270,598 |
|
|
|
305,735 |
|
Construction |
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
466,936 |
|
|
|
485,332 |
|
|
|
135,855 |
|
|
|
621,187 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
58,685 |
|
|
|
17,887 |
|
|
|
189,757 |
|
|
|
266,329 |
|
|
|
981,146 |
|
|
|
1,247,475 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
7,885 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
28,163 |
|
|
|
123,595 |
|
|
|
151,758 |
|
|
Total covered loans |
|
$ |
225,115 |
|
|
$ |
86,139 |
|
|
$ |
1,173,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,421 |
|
|
$ |
3,245,129 |
|
|
$ |
4,729,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Covered Loans |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered |
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
90 Days |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans held-in- |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
or More |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
108,244 |
|
|
$ |
89,403 |
|
|
$ |
434,956 |
|
|
$ |
632,603 |
|
|
$ |
1,830,946 |
|
|
$ |
2,463,549 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
12,091 |
|
|
|
5,491 |
|
|
|
32,585 |
|
|
|
50,167 |
|
|
|
253,465 |
|
|
|
303,632 |
|
Construction |
|
|
23,445 |
|
|
|
11,906 |
|
|
|
351,386 |
|
|
|
386,737 |
|
|
|
253,755 |
|
|
|
640,492 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
80,978 |
|
|
|
34,897 |
|
|
|
119,745 |
|
|
|
235,620 |
|
|
|
1,023,839 |
|
|
|
1,259,459 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
8,917 |
|
|
|
4,483 |
|
|
|
14,612 |
|
|
|
28,012 |
|
|
|
141,738 |
|
|
|
169,750 |
|
|
Total covered loans |
|
$ |
233,675 |
|
|
$ |
146,180 |
|
|
$ |
953,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,333,139 |
|
|
$ |
3,503,743 |
|
|
$ |
4,836,882 |
|
|
31
Acquired loans in an FDIC-assisted transaction
The following table presents loans acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction
accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 at the April 30, 2010 acquisition date. The
information presented includes loans determined to be impaired at the time of acquisition (credit
impaired loans), and loans that were considered to be performing at the acquisition date and are
accounted for by analogy to ASC Subtopic 310-30 (non-credit impaired loans). Refer to Note 1 to
the consolidated financial statements and the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of
the 2010 Annual Report for a description of the Corporations significant accounting policies
related to acquired loans and criteria considered by management to apply ASC 310-30 by analogy
to non-credit impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 (As recasted) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Non-credit Impaired Loans |
|
|
Credit Impaired Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Contractually-required principal and interest |
|
$ |
7,855,033 |
|
|
$ |
1,995,580 |
|
|
$ |
9,850,613 |
|
Non-accretable difference |
|
|
2,154,542 |
|
|
|
1,248,365 |
|
|
|
3,402,907 |
|
|
Cash flows expected to be collected |
|
|
5,700,491 |
|
|
|
747,215 |
|
|
|
6,447,706 |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
1,487,634 |
|
|
|
50,425 |
|
|
|
1,538,059 |
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted for under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC Subtopic 310-30 |
|
$ |
4,212,857 |
|
|
$ |
696,790 |
|
|
$ |
4,909,647 |
|
|
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the underlying
loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of the
acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted for under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $8.1 billion at the April 30, 2010 transaction date.
The carrying amount of the loans acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of loans determined to be impaired at the time of
acquisition, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 (credit impaired
loans), and loans that were considered to be performing at the acquisition date, accounted for by
analogy to ASC Subtopic 310-30 (non-credit impaired loans), as detailed in the following tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
|
|
Non-credit |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-credit |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired |
|
|
Impaired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired |
|
|
Impaired |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
2,087,064 |
|
|
$ |
232,529 |
|
|
$ |
2,319,593 |
|
|
$ |
2,133,600 |
|
|
$ |
247,654 |
|
|
$ |
2,381,254 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
117,544 |
|
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
121,354 |
|
|
|
117,869 |
|
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
126,126 |
|
Construction |
|
|
317,503 |
|
|
|
299,135 |
|
|
|
616,638 |
|
|
|
341,866 |
|
|
|
292,341 |
|
|
|
634,207 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1,138,173 |
|
|
|
88,743 |
|
|
|
1,226,916 |
|
|
|
1,156,879 |
|
|
|
87,062 |
|
|
|
1,243,941 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
128,366 |
|
|
|
10,629 |
|
|
|
138,995 |
|
|
|
144,165 |
|
|
|
10,235 |
|
|
|
154,400 |
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
3,788,650 |
|
|
$ |
634,846 |
|
|
$ |
4,423,496 |
|
|
$ |
3,894,379 |
|
|
$ |
645,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,539,928 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount, net of
allowance |
|
$ |
3,788,650 |
|
|
$ |
629,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,418,199 |
|
|
$ |
3,894,379 |
|
|
$ |
645,549 |
|
|
$ |
4,539,928 |
|
|
The outstanding principal balance of covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, including amounts charged off by the Corporation, amounted to $7.6
billion at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $7.7 billion). At March 31, 2011, none of the
acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction accounted for under ASC Subtopic
310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the
difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on
all acquired loans.
32
Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the acquired loans in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction at and for the year ended December 31, 2010 and at and for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, and which are accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-credit impaired loans |
|
|
Credit impaired loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Accretable |
|
|
amount of |
|
|
Accretable |
|
|
amount |
|
|
Accretable |
|
|
amount |
|
(In thousands) |
|
yield |
|
|
loans |
|
|
yield |
|
|
of loans |
|
|
yield |
|
|
of loans |
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions [1] |
|
$ |
1,487,634 |
|
|
$ |
4,212,857 |
|
|
$ |
50,425 |
|
|
$ |
696,790 |
|
|
$ |
1,538,059 |
|
|
$ |
4,909,647 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(179,707 |
) |
|
|
179,707 |
|
|
|
(27,244 |
) |
|
|
27,244 |
|
|
|
(206,951 |
) |
|
|
206,951 |
|
Collections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(576,670 |
) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,307,927 |
|
|
$ |
3,894,379 |
|
|
$ |
23,181 |
|
|
$ |
645,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,331,108 |
|
|
$ |
4,539,928 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(63,418 |
) |
|
|
63,418 |
|
|
|
(9,514 |
) |
|
|
9,514 |
|
|
|
(72,932 |
) |
|
|
72,932 |
|
Decrease in cash flow estimates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,127 |
) |
Collections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,534 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31, 2011, net
of allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
1,244,509 |
|
|
$ |
3,788,650 |
|
|
$ |
13,667 |
|
|
$ |
629,549 |
|
|
$ |
1,258,176 |
|
|
$ |
4,418,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Amount presented in the Carrying amount of loans column represents the estimated fair value of the loans at the date of acquisition. |
Note: There were no reclassifications from non-accretable difference to accretable yield from April 30, 2010 to March 31, 2011.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation recorded an allowance for loan losses
related to the acquired covered loans that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as one pool
reflected higher than expected credit deterioration. The following table provides the activity in
the allowance for loan losses related to these acquired loans for the first quarter of 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Credit Impaired Loans |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
9,127 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(3,830 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
5,297 |
|
|
There was no need to record an allowance for loan losses related to the covered loans at
December 31, 2010.
The Corporation accounts for lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting
guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually
required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into
interest income over the life of the loan, if the loan is accruing interest. The following table
presents acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 at the April 30, 2010 acquisition
date (as recasted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20 |
|
$ |
290,810 |
|
|
Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest) |
|
$ |
457,201 |
|
|
Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
$ |
164,427 |
|
|
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the underlying
loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments.
Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $0.3 billion
at March 31, 2011, and
December 31, 2010.
33
Note 10 Allowance for Loan Losses:
The following table presents the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
793,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
25,255 |
|
|
|
19,473 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(171,101 |
) |
|
|
(243,841 |
) |
Recoveries related to loans transferred to loans held-for-sale[1] |
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
736,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,277,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the nature of this amount. |
The Corporations allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 includes
$9 million related to the covered loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. This allowance covers the estimated credit loss exposure related to:
(i) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, which required an allowance for loan losses of
$5 million at quarter end, as one pool reflected a higher than expected credit deterioration; (ii) acquired
loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, which required an allowance for loan losses of $2 million, and
(iii) loan advances on loan commitments assumed by the Corporation as part of the acquisition, which required
an allowance of $2 million. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted
for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses. For purposes of loans
accounted for under ASC 310-20 and new loans originated as result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporations
assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss
contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC
Section 310-10-35 for individually impaired loans. Concurrently, the Corporation recorded an increase
in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss
sharing agreements.
34
The following tables present the changes in the allowance for loan losses and the loan balance
by portfolio segments for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Secured |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
174,786 |
|
|
$ |
81,857 |
|
|
$ |
16,074 |
|
|
$ |
42,029 |
|
|
$ |
7,154 |
|
|
$ |
133,531 |
|
|
$ |
455,431 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(35,205 |
) |
|
|
(12,534 |
) |
|
|
(14,099 |
) |
|
|
(8,204 |
) |
|
|
(1,946 |
) |
|
|
(35,823 |
) |
|
|
(107,811 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
5,322 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
7,063 |
|
|
|
17,594 |
|
Provision |
|
|
(8,567 |
) |
|
|
13,308 |
|
|
|
14,664 |
|
|
|
21,574 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
25,644 |
|
|
|
67,256 |
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
136,336 |
|
|
$ |
84,813 |
|
|
$ |
18,372 |
|
|
$ |
55,926 |
|
|
$ |
6,608 |
|
|
$ |
130,415 |
|
|
$ |
432,470 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
5,531 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
collectively evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
130,805 |
|
|
$ |
80,197 |
|
|
$ |
11,438 |
|
|
$ |
48,984 |
|
|
$ |
6,608 |
|
|
$ |
130,184 |
|
|
$ |
408,216 |
|
|
Ending balance: covered
loans accounted for
under ASC 310-30 and
ASC 310-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
$ |
6,934 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
9,159 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
8,787,036 |
|
|
$ |
584,680 |
|
|
$ |
770,476 |
|
|
$ |
5,278,656 |
|
|
$ |
565,881 |
|
|
$ |
3,004,612 |
|
|
$ |
18,991,341 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
315,442 |
|
|
$ |
9,633 |
|
|
$ |
56,607 |
|
|
$ |
141,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,501 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
collectively evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
6,068,199 |
|
|
$ |
269,312 |
|
|
$ |
92,682 |
|
|
$ |
3,889,361 |
|
|
$ |
565,881 |
|
|
$ |
2,852,855 |
|
|
$ |
13,738,290 |
|
|
Ending balance: covered
loans accounted for
under ASC 310-30 and
ASC 310-20 |
|
$ |
2,403,395 |
|
|
$ |
305,735 |
|
|
$ |
621,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,247,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
151,757 |
|
|
$ |
4,729,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
United States |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Secured |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
201,244 |
|
|
$ |
4,504 |
|
|
$ |
31,650 |
|
|
$ |
28,839 |
|
|
$ |
5,999 |
|
|
$ |
65,558 |
|
|
$ |
337,794 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(37,565 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(5,433 |
) |
|
|
(1,358 |
) |
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
(17,914 |
) |
|
|
(63,290 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
7,661 |
|
Recoveries related to loans
transferred to LHFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
Provision |
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
(17,833 |
) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
10,669 |
|
|
|
8,063 |
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
186,258 |
|
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
|
$ |
24,243 |
|
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
|
$ |
59,665 |
|
|
$ |
304,035 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
184,744 |
|
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
|
$ |
22,960 |
|
|
$ |
3,735 |
|
|
$ |
59,665 |
|
|
$ |
301,238 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
4,445,326 |
|
|
$ |
16,419 |
|
|
$ |
290,110 |
|
|
$ |
864,502 |
|
|
$ |
26,210 |
|
|
$ |
772,431 |
|
|
$ |
6,414,998 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
134,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
161,285 |
|
|
$ |
5,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
301,445 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
4,310,373 |
|
|
$ |
16,419 |
|
|
$ |
128,825 |
|
|
$ |
859,295 |
|
|
$ |
26,210 |
|
|
$ |
772,431 |
|
|
$ |
6,113,553 |
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Secured |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
376,030 |
|
|
$ |
86,361 |
|
|
$ |
47,724 |
|
|
$ |
70,868 |
|
|
$ |
13,153 |
|
|
$ |
199,089 |
|
|
$ |
793,225 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(72,770 |
) |
|
|
(13,226 |
) |
|
|
(19,532 |
) |
|
|
(9,562 |
) |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
(53,737 |
) |
|
|
(171,101 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
10,056 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
8,415 |
|
|
|
25,255 |
|
Recoveries related to loans
transferred to LHFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
Provision |
|
|
9,278 |
|
|
|
11,639 |
|
|
|
15,927 |
|
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
36,313 |
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
322,594 |
|
|
$ |
87,181 |
|
|
$ |
46,138 |
|
|
$ |
80,169 |
|
|
$ |
10,343 |
|
|
$ |
190,080 |
|
|
$ |
736,505 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
315,549 |
|
|
$ |
82,565 |
|
|
$ |
39,204 |
|
|
$ |
71,944 |
|
|
$ |
10,343 |
|
|
$ |
189,849 |
|
|
$ |
709,454 |
|
|
Ending balance: covered
loans accounted for under
ASC 310-30 and ASC 310-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
$ |
6,934 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
9,159 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
13,232,362 |
|
|
$ |
601,099 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,586 |
|
|
$ |
6,143,158 |
|
|
$ |
592,091 |
|
|
$ |
3,777,043 |
|
|
$ |
25,406,339 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
450,395 |
|
|
$ |
9,633 |
|
|
$ |
217,892 |
|
|
$ |
147,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
824,946 |
|
|
Ending balance: non-covered loans collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
10,378,572 |
|
|
$ |
285,731 |
|
|
$ |
221,507 |
|
|
$ |
4,748,656 |
|
|
$ |
592,091 |
|
|
$ |
3,625,286 |
|
|
$ |
19,851,843 |
|
|
Ending balance: covered
loans accounted for under
ASC 310-30 and ASC 310-20 |
|
$ |
2,403,395 |
|
|
$ |
305,735 |
|
|
$ |
621,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,247,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
151,757 |
|
|
$ |
4,729,550 |
|
|
36
Non-covered Impaired loans
Disclosures related to non-covered loans that were considered impaired based
on ASC Section 310-10-35 are included in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Impaired loans with related allowance |
|
$ |
187,586 |
|
|
$ |
154,349 |
|
|
$ |
1,328,985 |
|
Impaired loans that do not require an allowance |
|
|
637,360 |
|
|
|
644,150 |
|
|
|
425,994 |
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
824,946 |
|
|
$ |
798,499 |
|
|
$ |
1,754,979 |
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans |
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
$ |
345,605 |
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans during the quarter |
|
$ |
811,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,714,230 |
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during the quarter |
|
$ |
3,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,462 |
|
|
The following tables present commercial, construction and mortgage non-covered loans individually
evaluated for impairment at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans - With an Allowance |
|
|
With No Allowance |
|
|
Impaired Loans - Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
8,699 |
|
|
$ |
9,024 |
|
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
|
$ |
222,326 |
|
|
$ |
271,547 |
|
|
$ |
231,025 |
|
|
$ |
280,571 |
|
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
24,841 |
|
|
|
25,759 |
|
|
|
7,191 |
|
|
|
69,209 |
|
|
|
140,626 |
|
|
|
94,050 |
|
|
|
166,385 |
|
|
|
7,191 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,607 |
|
|
|
109,858 |
|
|
|
56,607 |
|
|
|
109,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
141,819 |
|
|
|
143,322 |
|
|
|
6,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,819 |
|
|
|
143,322 |
|
|
|
6,883 |
|
|
Total Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
175,359 |
|
|
$ |
178,105 |
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
$ |
348,142 |
|
|
$ |
522,031 |
|
|
$ |
523,501 |
|
|
$ |
700,136 |
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans - With an Allowance |
|
|
With No Allowance |
|
|
Impaired Loans - Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
87,088 |
|
|
$ |
127,228 |
|
|
$ |
88,484 |
|
|
$ |
128,624 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
|
|
40,845 |
|
|
|
62,368 |
|
|
|
46,469 |
|
|
|
67,992 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,285 |
|
|
|
239,045 |
|
|
|
161,285 |
|
|
|
239,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
Total USA |
|
$ |
12,227 |
|
|
$ |
12,227 |
|
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
$ |
289,218 |
|
|
$ |
428,641 |
|
|
$ |
301,445 |
|
|
$ |
440,868 |
|
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans - With an Allowance |
|
|
With No Allowance |
|
|
Impaired Loans - Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
10,095 |
|
|
$ |
10,420 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
309,414 |
|
|
$ |
398,775 |
|
|
$ |
319,509 |
|
|
$ |
409,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
30,465 |
|
|
|
31,383 |
|
|
|
8,624 |
|
|
|
110,054 |
|
|
|
202,994 |
|
|
|
140,519 |
|
|
|
234,377 |
|
|
|
8,624 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,892 |
|
|
|
348,903 |
|
|
|
217,892 |
|
|
|
348,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
147,026 |
|
|
|
148,529 |
|
|
|
8,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,026 |
|
|
|
148,529 |
|
|
|
8,166 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
187,586 |
|
|
$ |
190,332 |
|
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
|
$ |
637,360 |
|
|
$ |
950,672 |
|
|
$ |
824,946 |
|
|
$ |
1,141,004 |
|
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans With No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans With an Allowance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Impaired Loans Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
11,403 |
|
|
$ |
13,613 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
$ |
208,891 |
|
|
$ |
256,858 |
|
|
$ |
220,294 |
|
|
$ |
270,471 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
23,699 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
66,589 |
|
|
|
79,917 |
|
|
|
90,288 |
|
|
|
108,224 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
Construction |
|
|
4,514 |
|
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
61,184 |
|
|
|
99,016 |
|
|
|
65,698 |
|
|
|
109,531 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
114,733 |
|
|
|
115,595 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
121,209 |
|
|
|
122,071 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
Total Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
154,349 |
|
|
$ |
168,030 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
$ |
343,140 |
|
|
$ |
442,267 |
|
|
$ |
497,489 |
|
|
$ |
610,297 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans With No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans With an Allowance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Impaired Loans Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,856 |
|
|
$ |
152,876 |
|
|
$ |
101,856 |
|
|
$ |
152,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
|
44,443 |
|
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
|
44,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,624 |
|
|
|
248,955 |
|
|
|
165,624 |
|
|
|
248,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
301,010 |
|
|
$ |
446,274 |
|
|
$ |
301,010 |
|
|
$ |
446,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment in the USA portfolio at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans With No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans With an Allowance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Impaired Loans Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
11,403 |
|
|
$ |
13,613 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
|
$ |
310,747 |
|
|
$ |
409,734 |
|
|
$ |
322,150 |
|
|
$ |
423,347 |
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
23,699 |
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
|
|
100,119 |
|
|
|
124,360 |
|
|
|
123,818 |
|
|
|
152,667 |
|
|
|
4,960 |
|
Construction |
|
|
4,514 |
|
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
226,808 |
|
|
|
347,971 |
|
|
|
231,322 |
|
|
|
358,486 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
114,733 |
|
|
|
115,595 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
121,209 |
|
|
|
122,071 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
154,349 |
|
|
$ |
168,030 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
$ |
644,150 |
|
|
$ |
888,541 |
|
|
$ |
798,499 |
|
|
$ |
1,056,571 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
|
The following table presents the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on
non-covered impaired loans for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
USA |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Average Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
225,660 |
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
$ |
95,170 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
320,830 |
|
|
$ |
764 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
92,168 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
132,168 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Construction |
|
|
61,153 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
163,454 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
224,607 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
131,514 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,117 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
510,495 |
|
|
$ |
2,884 |
|
|
$ |
301,227 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
|
$ |
811,722 |
|
|
$ |
3,348 |
|
|
38
Troubled debt restructurings related to non-covered loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $580 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 -
$561 million). The amount of
outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been
modified in troubled debt restructurings amounted to $372 thousand related to the construction loan
portfolio and $2 million related to the commercial loan portfolio at March 31, 2011 (December 31,
2010 $3 million and $1 million, respectively).
Credit
Quality
The Corporation has defined a dual risk rating system to assign a
rating to all credit exposures, particularly for the commercial and
construction loan portfolios. Risk ratings in the aggregate
provide the Corporations management the asset quality profile
for the loan portfolio. The dual risk rating system provides for the
assignment of ratings at the obligor level based on the financial
condition of the borrower, and at the credit facility level based on the collateral
supporting the transaction.
The Corporations obligor risk rating scales range from rating 1 (Excellent) to rating 14 (Loss).
The obligor risk rating reflects the risk of payment default of a borrower in the ordinary course
of business. The risk ratings defined below conform to regulatory ratings.
|
|
Special Mention Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve
managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the Corporations credit
position at some future date. |
|
|
|
Substandard Loans classified as substandard are deemed to be inadequately protected by the
current net worth and payment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.
Loans classified as such have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain
some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. |
|
|
|
Doubtful Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified
as substandard, with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make the collection
or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values,
highly questionable and improbable. |
|
|
|
Loss Uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a bankable asset is not
warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or
salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset
even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. |
The Corporation has defined as adversely classified loans all credit facilities with obligor risk
ratings of Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. The assignment of the obligor risk rating is based on
relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debts such as current
financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and
current economic trends, among other factors.
The Corporation periodically reviews loans classified as watch list or worse, to evaluate if they
are properly classified, and to determine impairment, if any. The frequency of these reviews will
depend on the amount of the aggregate outstanding debt, and the risk rating classification of the
obligor. In addition, during the renewal process of applicable credit facilities, the Corporation
evaluates the corresponding loan grades.
39
Loans classified as pass credits are excluded from the scope of the review process described above
until: (a) they become past due; (b) management becomes aware of deterioration in the credit
worthiness of the borrower; or (c) the customer contacts the Corporation for a modification. In
these circumstances, the credit facilities are specifically evaluated to assign the appropriate
risk rating classification.
The
following table presents the outstanding balance, net of
unearned, of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio that the Corporation has defined as adversely classified at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Adversely Classified |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Adversely Classified |
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
609,548 |
|
|
$ |
3,630,486 |
|
|
$ |
623,325 |
|
|
$ |
3,855,598 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
395,332 |
|
|
|
3,032,100 |
|
|
|
355,562 |
|
|
|
2,861,418 |
|
Construction |
|
|
67,517 |
|
|
|
149,289 |
|
|
|
83,115 |
|
|
|
168,356 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
606,763 |
|
|
|
4,031,180 |
|
|
|
550,933 |
|
|
|
3,649,700 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
20,529 |
|
|
|
565,881 |
|
|
|
11,508 |
|
|
|
572,787 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
48,794 |
|
|
|
2,852,855 |
|
|
|
52,133 |
|
|
|
2,897,835 |
|
|
Total Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
1,748,483 |
|
|
$ |
14,261,791 |
|
|
$ |
1,676,576 |
|
|
$ |
14,005,694 |
|
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
616,014 |
|
|
$ |
3,250,603 |
|
|
$ |
633,470 |
|
|
$ |
3,151,078 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
206,046 |
|
|
|
1,211,142 |
|
|
|
250,843 |
|
|
|
1,525,391 |
|
Construction |
|
|
240,532 |
|
|
|
290,110 |
|
|
|
274,300 |
|
|
|
332,495 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
26,355 |
|
|
|
864,502 |
|
|
|
23,587 |
|
|
|
875,022 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,206 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
19,311 |
|
|
|
772,431 |
|
|
|
23,065 |
|
|
|
808,149 |
|
|
Total United States |
|
$ |
1,108,258 |
|
|
$ |
6,414,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,205,265 |
|
|
$ |
6,722,341 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,856,741 |
|
|
$ |
20,676,789 |
|
|
$ |
2,881,841 |
|
|
$ |
20,728,035 |
|
|
Note 11 FDIC Loss Share Indemnification Asset:
In connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR entered into loss sharing
agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned. Pursuant to
the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDICs obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with
respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse
BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of
recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid BPPR 80% reimbursement under the loss
sharing agreements. The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage
loans provides for FDIC loss and recoveries sharing for ten years. The loss sharing agreement
applicable to commercial and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and BPPR
reimbursement to the FDIC for eight years, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as
described above.
In addition, as disclosed in the 2010 Annual Report, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment
to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (the True-Up Measurement Date) of
the final shared-loss month, or upon the final disposition of all
40
covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing
agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated true-up payment is recorded as a reduction
of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
The following table sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
2,311,997 |
|
Increase due to a decrease in cash flow estimates |
|
|
12,445 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
24,308 |
|
Decrease due to reciprocal accounting on the discount
accretion for loans and unfunded commitments accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-20 |
|
|
(21,465 |
) |
Claims |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
2,325,618 |
|
|
Note 12 Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights:
The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA
and FNMA securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and
servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the
corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/service agreements the Corporation is required to
service the loans in accordance with the agencies servicing guidelines and standards.
Substantially, all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA and FNMA securities have
fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain
representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some
instances, has sold loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer
to Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation retained servicing rights on guaranteed
mortgage securitizations (FNMA and GNMA) and whole loan sales involving approximately $366 million
in principal balance outstanding (March 31, 2010 $231 million). During the quarter ended March
31, 2011, the Corporation recognized net gains of approximately $0.5 million on these transactions
(March 31, 2010 $4.5 million). All loan sales or securitizations performed during the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 were without credit recourse agreements.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $335 million of
assets as result of securitization transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $329 million in
mortgage-backed securities and $6 million in servicing rights. During the quarter ended March 31,
2010, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $209 million of assets as result of securitization
transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $205 million in mortgage-backed securities and $4
million in servicing rights. No liabilities were incurred as a result of these transfers during the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 because they did not contain any credit recourse
arrangements. The Corporation recorded a net gain of $6.3 million and $5.2 million, respectively,
during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 related to these residential mortgage loans
securitized.
The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from
residential mortgage loans securitized during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
255,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
255,574 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,018 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
328,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
328,592 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
328,592 |
|
|
$ |
5,949 |
|
|
$ |
334,541 |
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
161,925 |
|
|
$ |
1,629 |
|
|
$ |
163,554 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,692 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,629 |
|
|
$ |
202,246 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
200,617 |
|
|
$ |
8,180 |
|
|
$ |
208,797 |
|
|
The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these
rights are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.
Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of
assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries
that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. These mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are measured at fair value. Fair value determination is performed on a
subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in accordance with the types of assets or markets
served.
The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The
discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate,
cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late
fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporations loan
characteristics and portfolio behavior.
The following table presents the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Fair value at beginning of year |
|
$ |
166,907 |
|
|
$ |
169,747 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
6,297 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans [1] |
|
|
(4,254 |
) |
|
|
(3,734 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(1,917 |
) |
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
Fair value at end of year |
|
$ |
167,416 |
|
|
$ |
173,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $18.0 billion at March 31, 2011 (December
31, 2010 $18.4 billion; March 31, 2010 $17.6 billion).
Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of
operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may
result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in
discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to
collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value
adjustments, for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $12.4 million (March 31, 2010 $10.9
million). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding
loan balance. At March 31, 2011, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.26% (2010
0.27%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn
significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.
42
The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs,
originated and purchased.
Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the
residential mortgage loan securitizations and whole loan sales by the banking subsidiaries during
the quarters ended March 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Prepayment speed |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Weighted average life |
|
20.6 years |
|
13.5 years |
Discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and
securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions at March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated MSRs |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
104,513 |
|
|
$ |
102,235 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
12.5 years |
|
11.8 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($3,441 |
) |
|
|
($3,289 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($6,811 |
) |
|
|
($6,500 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($4,582 |
) |
|
|
($4,300 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($8,895 |
) |
|
|
($8,362 |
) |
|
|
The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial institutions.
The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions at March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
|
|
Purchased MSRs |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
62,903 |
|
|
$ |
71,124 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
12.0 years |
|
|
13.5 years |
|
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,577 |
) |
|
|
($2,597 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($4,642 |
) |
|
|
($4,562 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,821 |
) |
|
|
($3,223 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($5,077 |
) |
|
|
($5,728 |
) |
|
The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are hypothetical
and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 and
20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of
the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the sensitivity
tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of
the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in
one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may
result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the
sensitivities.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation serviced $3.8 billion (December 31, 2010 $4.0 billion; March
31, 2010 $4.3 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.
43
Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase (but not
the obligation), at its option and without GNMAs prior authorization, any loan that is collateral
for a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the
time that individual loans meet GNMAs specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for
repurchase, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. At March
31, 2011, the Corporation had recorded $157 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements
related to this buy-back option program (March 31, 2010 $138 million).
Note 13 Other Assets:
The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following
major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
$ |
294,559 |
|
|
$ |
299,185 |
|
|
$ |
106,147 |
|
Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance) |
|
|
250,568 |
|
|
|
388,466 |
|
|
|
366,224 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
239,103 |
|
|
|
237,997 |
|
|
|
234,008 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
129,093 |
|
|
|
147,513 |
|
|
|
193,166 |
|
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
66,719 |
|
|
|
75,149 |
|
|
|
125,387 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
65,169 |
|
|
|
72,510 |
|
|
|
72,356 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and counterparties |
|
|
37,752 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
57,536 |
|
Others |
|
|
238,937 |
|
|
|
234,906 |
|
|
|
225,604 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,321,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,456,073 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,428 |
|
|
Note 14 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
allocated by reportable segments and corporate group, were as follows (refer to Note 30 for the
definition of the Corporations reportable segments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Goodwill on |
|
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
Other |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
245,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245,309 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
647,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
647,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Goodwill on |
|
|
accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
Other |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
44
The following table presents the gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses at
the beginning and the end of the quarter by reportable segment and Corporate group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
impairment |
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
impairment |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(gross amounts) |
|
|
losses |
|
|
(net amounts) |
|
|
(gross amounts) |
|
|
losses |
|
|
(net amounts) |
|
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
245,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245,309 |
|
|
$ |
245,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
245,309 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
811,798 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
647,387 |
|
|
$ |
811,798 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
647,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
impairment |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
impairment |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(gross amounts) |
|
|
losses |
|
|
(net amounts) |
|
|
(gross amounts) |
|
|
losses |
|
|
(net amounts) |
|
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
768,943 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
$ |
768,943 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the Corporation had $6 million of
identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOANs
trademark.
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
80,591 |
|
|
$ |
31,912 |
|
|
$ |
80,591 |
|
|
$ |
29,817 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
32,706 |
|
Other customer relationships |
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
8,743 |
|
|
|
6,048 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
85,872 |
|
|
$ |
35,545 |
|
|
$ |
85,872 |
|
|
$ |
33,290 |
|
|
$ |
74,247 |
|
|
$ |
38,834 |
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation recognized $2.3 million in
amortization expense related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (March 31, 2010
- $2.0 million).
The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite
useful lives for each of the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2011 |
|
$ |
6,765 |
|
Year 2012 |
|
|
8,493 |
|
Year 2013 |
|
|
8,309 |
|
Year 2014 |
|
|
7,666 |
|
Year 2015 |
|
|
5,522 |
|
Year 2016 |
|
|
5,252 |
|
|
45
Note 15 Deposits:
Total interest bearing deposits consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
$ |
6,274,716 |
|
|
$ |
6,177,074 |
|
NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
4,991,617 |
|
|
|
4,756,615 |
|
|
Total savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
11,266,333 |
|
|
|
10,933,689 |
|
|
Certificates of deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000 |
|
|
6,402,998 |
|
|
|
6,238,229 |
|
$100,000 and over |
|
|
4,614,334 |
|
|
|
4,650,961 |
|
|
Total certificates of deposit |
|
|
11,017,332 |
|
|
|
10,889,190 |
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
22,283,665 |
|
|
$ |
21,822,879 |
|
|
A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity at March 31, 2011, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
6,337,697 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,189,299 |
|
2013 |
|
|
876,551 |
|
2014 |
|
|
490,742 |
|
2015 |
|
|
845,355 |
|
2016 and thereafter |
|
|
277,688 |
|
|
Total certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
11,017,332 |
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had brokered certificates of deposit amounting to $2.5
billion (December 31, 2010 $2.3 billion).
The aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans was
$61 million at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $52 million).
Note 16 Borrowings:
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
2,642,800 |
|
|
$ |
2,412,550 |
|
|
$ |
2,491,506 |
|
|
The repurchase agreements outstanding at March 31, 2011 were collateralized by $2.1 billion in
investment securities available-for-sale, $587 million in trading securities and $32 million in
other assets. At December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, the repurchase agreements were
collateralized by investment securities available-for-sale and trading securities of $2.1 billion
and $492 million; and $2.2 billion and $347 million; respectively. It is the Corporations policy
to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such
securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements of condition.
In addition, there were repurchase agreements outstanding collateralized by $209 million in
securities purchased underlying agreements to resell to which the Corporation has the right to
repledge (December 31, 2010 $172 million; March 31, 2010 $181 million). It is the Corporations
policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. However, the
counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities, and accordingly
are not reflected in the Corporations consolidated statements of condition.
46
Other short-term borrowings consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Advances with the FHLB paying interest at maturity at fixed rates ranging from 0.36% to 0.40% |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term funds purchased paying interest at maturity at fixed rates ranging from 0.70% to 1.05%
(March 31, 2010 0.90% to 0.95%) |
|
|
39,102 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
Securities sold not yet purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
Total other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
290,302 |
|
|
$ |
364,222 |
|
|
$ |
23,263 |
|
|
Notes payable consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Advances with the FHLB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-with maturities ranging from 2011 through 2016 paying interest at
monthly fixed rates ranging from 0.66% to 4.95% (March 31, 2010 -
1.48% to 5.10%) |
|
$ |
577,000 |
|
|
$ |
385,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,056,708 |
|
-maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Note issued to the FDIC, including unamortized premium of $1,519;
paying interest monthly at an annual fixed rate of 2.50%; maturing
on April 30, 2015 or such earlier date as such amount may become
due and payable pursuant to the terms of the note |
|
|
2,022,669 |
|
|
|
2,492,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2011 to 2013 paying
interest semiannually at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 7.03%
(March 31, 2010 5.25% to 13.00%) |
|
|
278,201 |
|
|
|
381,133 |
|
|
|
381,926 |
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2011 to 2013 paying
interest monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S.
Treasury note rate |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
Term notes maturing in 2011 paying interest quarterly at a floating
rate of 9.75% over the 3-month LIBOR rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to
trust preferred securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to
2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer
to Note 17) |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to
trust preferred securities) ($936,000 less discount of $485,128 at
March 31, 2011 and $507,335 at March 31, 2010) with no stated
maturity and a fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding
December 5, 2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to Note 17) |
|
|
450,872 |
|
|
|
444,981 |
|
|
|
428,665 |
|
Others |
|
|
25,206 |
|
|
|
25,331 |
|
|
|
25,654 |
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
3,794,655 |
|
|
$ |
4,170,183 |
|
|
$ |
2,529,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations 2010 Annual Report, for rates and maturity information corresponding to the borrowings
outstanding at December 31, 2010. Key index rates at March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively, were as follows:
3-month LIBOR rate = 0.30% and 0.29%; 10-year U.S. Treasury note = 3.47% and 3.83%. |
In consideration for the excess assets acquired over liabilities assumed as part of the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR issued to the FDIC a secured note (the note issued to
the FDIC) in the amount of $5.8 billion at April 30, 2010, which has full recourse to BPPR. As
indicated in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the note issued to the FDIC is
collateralized by the loans (other than certain consumer loans) and other real estate acquired in
the agreement with the FDIC and all proceeds derived from such assets, including cash inflows from
claims to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. Proceeds received from such sources are used
to pay the note under the conditions stipulated in the agreement. The entire outstanding principal
balance of the note issued to the FDIC is due five years from issuance (April 30, 2015), or such
date as such amount may become due and payable pursuant to the terms of the note. Borrowings under
the note bear interest at an annual fixed rate of 2.50% and is paid monthly. If the Corporation
fails to pay any interest as and when due, such interest shall accrue interest at the note interest
rate plus 2.00% per annum. The Corporation may repay the note in whole or in part without any
penalty subject to certain notification requirements indicated in the agreement. During the first
quarter of 2011, the Corporation prepaid $224 million of the note issued to the FDIC from funds
unrelated to the assets securing the note.
47
A breakdown of borrowings by contractual maturities at March 31, 2011 is included in the table
below. Given its nature, the maturity of the note issued to the FDIC was based on expected
repayment dates and not on its April 30, 2015 contractual maturity date. The expected repayments
consider the timing of expected cash inflows on the loans, OREO and claims on the loss sharing
agreements that will be applied to repay the note during the period that the note payable to the
FDIC is outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets sold under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agreements to |
|
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
repurchase |
|
|
borrowings |
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1,530,610 |
|
|
$ |
290,302 |
|
|
$ |
2,149,302 |
|
|
$ |
3,970,214 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447,567 |
|
|
|
522,567 |
|
2013 |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,743 |
|
|
|
147,743 |
|
2014 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,824 |
|
|
|
460,824 |
|
2015 |
|
|
174,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
175,080 |
|
Later years |
|
|
464,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,402 |
|
|
|
1,000,457 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,642,800 |
|
|
|
290,302 |
|
|
|
4,279,783 |
|
|
|
7,212,885 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(485,128 |
) |
|
|
(485,128 |
) |
|
Total borrowings |
|
$ |
2,642,800 |
|
|
$ |
290,302 |
|
|
$ |
3,794,655 |
|
|
$ |
6,727,757 |
|
|
Note 17 Trust Preferred Securities:
At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, four statutory trusts established by the
Corporation (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and
Popular Capital Trust II) had issued trust preferred securities (also referred to as capital
securities) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the
related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the common securities), were used by the
trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the junior subordinated
debentures) issued by the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established the Popular
Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock held by the
U.S. Treasury at the time for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In connection with
this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of issuance
and sale of common securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated debentures issued by
the Corporation.
The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the
Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the
Corporation pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the
consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are
included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or
indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.
48
The following table presents financial data pertaining to the different trusts at March 31,
2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Popular |
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
BanPonce Trust I |
|
|
Capital Trust I |
|
|
Capital Trust I |
|
|
Capital Trust II |
|
|
Popular Capital Trust III |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
$ |
935,000 |
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
5.000% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.000% thereafter |
|
Common securities |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures
aggregate liquidation amount |
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
$ |
936,000 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
|
February 2027 |
|
|
|
November 2033 |
|
|
|
September 2034 |
|
|
|
December 2034 |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
Reference notes |
|
|
[a],[c],[f] |
|
|
|
[b],[d],[e] |
|
|
|
[a],[c],[e] |
|
|
|
[b],[d],[e] |
|
|
|
[b],[d],[g],[h] |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (PNA) and indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
[b] |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
[c] |
|
The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the capital securities under the
trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the
applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
[d] |
|
These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the
extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
[e] |
|
The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal Reserve, to redeem after certain
dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below, the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price
equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the
junior subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated maturity dates (i) on
or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements, in whole at any time or in part from time to
time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of
a tax event, an investment company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital
securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. |
|
[f] |
|
Same as [e] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early redemption. |
|
[g] |
|
The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System. |
|
[h] |
|
Carrying value of junior subordinates debentures of $451 million at March 31, 2011 ($936 million aggregate liquidation
amount, net of $485 million discount) and $445 million at December 31, 2010 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net
of $491 million discount) and $429 million at March 31, 2010 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $507 million
discount). |
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities represent
restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1
capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements
(including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). At March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25%
limitation. Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. At March 31,
2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements exceeded the 25% limitation and, as such,
$40 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities were disallowed as Tier 1 capital.
Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in
Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. Effective March 31, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board
revised the quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital elements included in the
Tier 1 capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including
restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability.
Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, has a provision to effectively phase out the
use of trust preferred securities issued before May 19, 2010 as Tier 1 capital over a 3-year period
commencing on January 1, 2013. Trust preferred securities issued on or after May 19, 2010 no longer
qualify as Tier 1 capital. At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred
securities (capital securities) that are subject to the phase-out. The Corporation has not issued
any trust preferred securities since May 19, 2010. At March 31, 2011, the remaining trust preferred
securities corresponded to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008. The Dodd-Frank Act includes an exemption from the phase-out provision that applies to these
capital securities.
49
Note 18 Stockholders Equity:
BPPR statutory reserve
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $402 million at March
31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 $402 million; March 31, 2010 $402 million). There were no transfers
between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Note 19 Guarantees:
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.6 million (December 31, 2010 $0.5
million and March 31, 2010 $0.7 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the
obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. Management
does not anticipate any material losses related to these instruments.
Also, the Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject
to limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as
collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may sell,
in bulk sale transactions, residential mortgage loans and SBA commercial loans subject to credit
recourse or to certain representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These
representations and warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan
documentation, collateral, prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required
to repurchase the loans under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation serviced $3.8 billion (December 31, 2010 $4.0 billion; March
31, 2010 $4.3 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions,
principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs.
In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is
required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The
maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under
the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the
total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if
applicable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation repurchased approximately $63
million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions
(March 31, 2010 $18 million). In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has
rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on
these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted
mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected
interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At March 31, 2011,
the Corporations liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to
loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $55 million (December 31, 2010 $54
million; March 31, 2010 $29 million).
The following table presents the changes in the Corporations liability of estimated losses from
these credit recourses agreements, included in the consolidated statements of condition for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
53,729 |
|
|
$ |
15,584 |
|
Provision for recourse liability |
|
|
9,765 |
|
|
|
15,701 |
|
Net charge-offs / terminations |
|
|
(8,176 |
) |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
55,318 |
|
|
$ |
29,041 |
|
|
The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a
liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in
the line item adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold in the consolidated
statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant
information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a
function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include
actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the
probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse
liability.
50
Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss,
which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of
default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in
good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression
analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics,
including credit scores, loan-to-value rates and loan aging, among others.
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged
for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may
sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not
meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or
indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures
are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met.
The Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated statements
of condition for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to
mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the
Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and
insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At March 31, 2011, the
Corporation serviced $18.0 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit
recourse (December 31, 2010 $18.4 billion; March 31, 2010 $17.6 billion). The Corporation
generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from
liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under
the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the
Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is
outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and
defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be
canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future
servicing income with respect to that loan. At March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of funds
advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $28
million (December 31, 2010 $24 million; March 31, 2010 $21 million). To the extent the mortgage
loans underlying the Corporations servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the
Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation
to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in
collection efforts.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation has reserves for customary representation and warranties related
to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Loans had been sold to investors on a
servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. At March 31, 2011, the Corporations
reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $31
million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition
(December 31, 2010 $31 million; March 31, 2010 $32 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating
and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008. On a quarterly basis, the
Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected losses associated to E-LOANs customary
representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis incorporates expectations on future
disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole events. The analysis also considers
factors such as the average length-time between the loans funding date and the loan repurchase
date, as observed in the historical loan data. Make-whole events are typically defaulted cases in
which the investor attempts to recover by collateral or guarantees, and the seller is obligated to
cover any impaired or unrecovered portion of the loan. Claims have been predominantly for first
mortgage agency loans and principally consist of underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or
missing documentation. The following table presents the changes in the Corporations liability for
estimated losses associated with customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by
E-LOAN, included in the consolidated statement of condition for the quarters ended March 31, 2011
and 2010.
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
30,659 |
|
|
$ |
33,294 |
|
Provision for representation and warranties |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
Net charge-offs / terminations |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(2,590 |
) |
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
30,688 |
|
|
$ |
31,937 |
|
|
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain
representations or warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by the discontinued
operations of Popular Financial Holdings (PFH). The sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. At
March 31, 2011, the agreements primarily include indemnification for breaches of certain key
representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time period; others survive
until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do not expire. Certain of
the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability defined as a percentage of
the purchase price. The indemnification agreements outstanding at March 31, 2011 are related
principally to make-whole arrangements. At March 31, 2011, the Corporations reserve related to
PFHs indemnity arrangements amounted to $4 million (December 31, 2010 $8 million; March 31, 2010
- $10 million), and is included as other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
The reserve balance at March 31, 2011 contemplates historical indemnity payments. Certain
indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement of premiums on early loan
payoffs and repurchase obligation for defaulted loans within a short-term timeframe, expired during
2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to guarantee certain
obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations. The following table presents
the changes in the Corporations liability for estimated losses associated to loans sold by the
discontinued operations of PFH, included in the consolidated statement of condition for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,058 |
|
|
$ |
9,405 |
|
Provision for representation and warranties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
Net charge-offs / terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
Other settlements paid |
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
4,261 |
|
|
$ |
9,626 |
|
|
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.7 billion
at March 31, 2011 (December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 $0.6 billion). In addition, at March 31,
2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a
subordinated basis $1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by
wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.
Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the trust
preferred securities.
Note 20 Commitments and Contingencies:
Off-balance sheet risk
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk in the
normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include loan commitments, letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount
recognized in the consolidated statements of condition.
The Corporations exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments. The
Corporation uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations
as it does for those reflected on the consolidated statements of condition.
52
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk, whose contract amounts represent
potential credit risk, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card lines |
|
$ |
3,864,026 |
|
|
$ |
3,583,430 |
|
|
$ |
3,718,806 |
|
Commercial lines of credit |
|
|
2,471,756 |
|
|
|
1,920,056 |
|
|
|
2,620,728 |
|
Other unused credit commitments |
|
|
373,832 |
|
|
|
375,565 |
|
|
|
404,558 |
|
Commercial letters of credit |
|
|
13,297 |
|
|
|
12,532 |
|
|
|
18,439 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
133,178 |
|
|
|
140,064 |
|
|
|
124,333 |
|
Commitments to originate mortgage loans |
|
|
40,002 |
|
|
|
47,493 |
|
|
|
43,350 |
|
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $17 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit (December 31, 2010 $21 million; March 31, 2010 $10 million), including $4 million of
the unamortized balance of the contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments recorded with the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction (December 31, 2010 $6 million).
Other commitments
At March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010, the Corporation also maintained other
non-credit commitments for $10 million, primarily for the acquisition of other investments.
Business concentration
Since the Corporations business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico,
its results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the
Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The
concentration of the Corporations operations in Puerto Rico exposes it to greater risk than other
banking companies with a wider geographic base. Its asset and revenue composition by geographical
area is presented in Note 30 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporations loan portfolio is diversified by loan category. However, approximately $12.2
billion, or 59% of the Corporations loan portfolio not covered under the FDIC loss sharing
agreements, excluding loans held-for-sale, at March 31, 2011, consisted of real estate-related loans, including residential
mortgage loans, construction loans and commercial loans secured by commercial real estate (December
31, 2010 $12.0 billion, or 58%).
Except for the Corporations exposure to the Puerto Rico Government sector, no individual or single
group of related accounts is considered material in relation to our total assets or deposits, or in
relation to our overall business. At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had approximately $1.4 billion
of credit facilities granted to or guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Government, its municipalities and
public corporations, of which $215 million were uncommitted lines of credit (December 31, 2010 -
$1.4 billion and $199 million, respectively; March 31, 2010 $1.1 billion and $215 million,
respectively). Of the total credit facilities granted, $1.1 billion was outstanding at March 31,
2011 (December 31, 2010 $1.1 billion; March 31, 2010 $841 million). Furthermore, at March 31,
2011, the Corporation had $143 million in obligations issued or guaranteed by the Puerto Rico
Government, its municipalities and public corporations as part of its investment securities
portfolio (December 31, 2010 $145 million; March 31, 2010 $260 million).
Other contingencies
As indicated in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements,
as part of the loss sharing agreements related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation agreed to make
a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the
final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements
fail to reach expected levels. The true up-payment was estimated at $169 million and is considered as part of the carrying
value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
53
Legal Proceedings
The nature of Populars business ordinarily results in a certain number of claims, litigation,
investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings. When the Corporation determines
it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Corporation
will consider the settlement of cases (including cases where it has meritorious defenses) when, in
managements judgment, it is in the best interests of both the Corporation and its shareholders to
do so.
On at least a quarterly basis, Popular assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection
with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it
is probable that the Corporation will incur a loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the
Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted on at
least a quarterly basis as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a
loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.
In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is
reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes an estimate of the aggregate range of
reasonably possible losses for those matters where a range may be determined, in excess of amounts
accrued, for current legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $30.0 million at March 31, 2011.
For certain other cases, management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any
estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the
fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants
in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the
numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various
potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, managements estimate will change from
time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.
While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information
currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, management believes that
the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the
Corporations legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations
consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future
developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be
material to the Corporations consolidated financial position in a particular period.
Between May 14, 2009 and September 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc., and certain of its directors and
officers, among others. The five class actions were consolidated into two separate actions: a
securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero v.
Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action entitled
In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v. Popular,
Inc., et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
included as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock, among
others. The consolidated action purported to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities
between January 24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleged that the defendants violated Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading. The
consolidated action also alleged that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint sought class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular, the underwriter
defendants and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action
complaint. On August 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the
motion to dismiss filed by the underwriter defendants on statute of limitations grounds. The Court
also dismissed the Section 11 claim brought against Populars directors on statute of limitations
grounds and the Section 12(a)(2) claim brought against Popular because plaintiffs lacked standing.
The Court declined to dismiss the claims brought against Popular and certain of its officers under
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder), Section 20(a) of the
Exchange Act, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, holding that plaintiffs had adequately
alleged that defendants made materially false and misleading statements with the requisite state of
mind.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated complaint purported to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc.
U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment
Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409
and 502(a)(2) of ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom was alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleged that defendants
breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to eliminate Popular
stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint sought to recover alleged losses to
the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive trust, along with
costs and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a scheduling order issued
by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to the amended complaint.
Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants filed a motion to
dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the alternative, for judgment on the
pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in which he
recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to Banco Popular de Puerto
Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted. On May 19, 2010, Popular filed
objections to the magistrate judges report and recommendation. On September 30, 2010, the Court
issued an order without opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss and
providing that the Court would issue an opinion and order explaining its decision. No opinion was,
however, issued prior to the settlement in principle discussed below.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) were brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints sought a
judgment that the action was a proper derivative action, an award of damages, restitution, costs
and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009,
the Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities
class action. On October
54
15, 2009,
Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García complaint for failure
to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On November 20, 2009,
plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants moved to dismiss the García amended complaint. At a scheduling conference held on
January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in both the Hoff and García matters pending resolution
of their respective motions to dismiss. On August 11, 2010, the Court granted in part and denied in
part the motion to dismiss the Garcia action. The Court dismissed the gross mismanagement and
corporate waste claims, but declined to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claim. The Díaz case,
filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan, was removed to the U.S. District Court
for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved
to consolidate the García and Díaz actions. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Diaz
case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance and to stay defendants consolidation motion
pending the outcome of the remand proceedings. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order
without opinion remanding the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. On October 13,
2010, the Court issued a Statement of Reasons In Support of Remand Order. On October 28, 2010,
Popular and the individual defendants moved for reconsideration of the remand order. The court
denied Populars request for reconsideration shortly thereafter.
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under Puerto
Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, plaintiff in that action moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On May 4, 2010, the Court denied plaintiffs request for
reconsideration. On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed an appeal before the Puerto Rico Court of
Appeals. On June 11, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the appeal. On
June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. On July 6, 2010, plaintiff moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On July 16, 2010, the Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs
request for reconsideration.
At the Courts request, the parties to the Hoff and García cases discussed the prospect of
mediation and agreed to nonbinding mediation in an attempt to determine whether the cases could be
settled. On January 18 and 19, 2011, the parties to the Hoff and García cases engaged in
nonbinding mediation before the Honorable Nicholas Politan. As a result of the mediation, the
Corporation and the other named defendants to the Hoff matter entered into a memorandum of
understanding to settle this matter. Under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, subject to
certain customary conditions including court approval of a final settlement agreement in
consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants, the amount of $37.5 million
will be paid by or on behalf of defendants (of which management expects approximately $30 million
will be covered by insurance). The parties intend to file a stipulation of settlement and a joint
motion for preliminary approval within the next few weeks. The Corporation recognized a charge, net
of the amount expected to be covered by insurance, of $7.5 million in December 2010 to cover the
uninsured portion of the settlement.
In addition, the Corporation is aware that a suit asserting similar claims on behalf of certain
individual shareholders under the federal securities laws was filed on January 18, 2011.
A separate memorandum of understanding was subsequently entered by the parties to the García and
Diaz actions in April 2011. Under the terms of this memorandum of understanding, subject to certain
customary conditions, including court approval of a final settlement agreement, and in
consideration for the full and final settlement and release of all defendants, Popular has agreed,
for a period of three years, to maintain or implement certain corporate governance practices,
measures and policies, as set forth in the memorandum of understanding. Aside from the payment by
or on behalf of Popular of approximately $2.1 million of attorneys fees and expenses of counsel
for the plaintiffs (of which management expects $1.6 million will be
covered by insurance), the settlement does not require any cash payments by or on behalf of Popular or
the defendants. The parties intend to file a joint request to approve the settlement within the
next few weeks.
Prior to the Hoff and derivative action mediation, the parties to the ERISA class action entered
into a separate memorandum of understanding to settle that action. Under the terms of the ERISA
memorandum of understanding, subject to certain customary conditions including court approval of a
final settlement agreement and in consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants,
the amount of $8.2 million will be paid by or on behalf of the defendants (all of which management
expects will be covered by insurance). The parties filed a joint request to approve the settlement
on April 13, 2011. On April 29, 2011, the court entered an order scheduling a hearing for May 27,
2011, regarding preliminary approval of the proposed settlement in the ERISA class action.
Popular does not expect to record any material gain or loss as a result of the settlements. Popular
has made no admission of liability in connection with these settlements.
55
At this point, the settlement agreements are not final and are subject to a number of future
events, including approval of the settlements by the relevant courts. There can be no assurances
that the settlements will be finalized or as to the timing of the payments described above.
In addition to the foregoing, Banco Popular is a defendant in two
lawsuits arising from its consumer banking and trust-related
activities.
On October 7, 2010, a putative class action for breach of contract and damages captioned
Almeyda-Santiago v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First
Instance against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The complaint essentially asserts that plaintiff has
suffered damages because of Banco Populars allegedly fraudulent overdraft fee practices in
connection with debit card transactions. Such practices allegedly consist of: (a) the
reorganization of electronic debit transactions in high-to-low order so as to multiply the number
of overdraft fees assessed on its customers; (b) the assessment of overdraft fees even when clients
have not overdrawn their accounts; (c) the failure to disclose, or to adequately disclose, its
overdraft policy to its customers; and (d) the provision of false and fraudulent information
regarding its clients account balances at point of sale transactions and on its website. Plaintiff
seeks damages, restitution and provisional remedies against Banco Popular for breach of contract,
abuse of trust, illegal conversion and unjust enrichment. On January 13, 2011, Banco Popular
submitted a motion to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs opposition thereto is due on May 31, 2011.
On December 13, 2010, Popular was served with a class action complaint captioned García Lamadrid,
et al. v. Banco Popular, et al. which was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. The
complaint generally seeks damages against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, other defendants and their
respective insurance companies for their alleged breach of certain fiduciary duties, breach of
contract, and alleged violations of local tort law. Plaintiffs seek in excess of $600 million in
damages, plus costs and attorneys fees.
More specifically, plaintiffs Guillermo García Lamadrid and Benito del Cueto Figueras are suing
Defendant BPPR for the losses they (and others) experienced through their investment in the RG
Financial Corporation-backed Conservation Trust Fund securities. Plaintiffs essentially claim that
Banco Popular allegedly breached its fiduciary duties to them by failing to keep all relevant
parties informed of any developments that could affect the Conservation Trust notes or that could
become an event of default under the relevant trust agreements; and that in so doing, it acted
imprudently, unreasonably and grossly negligently. Popular submitted a motion to dismiss on
February 28, 2011. Plaintiffs submitted an opposition thereto on April 15, 2011.
Note 21 Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities:
The Corporation is involved with four statutory trusts which it established to issue trust
preferred securities to the public. Also, it established Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose
of exchanging Series C preferred stock shares held by the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred
securities issued by this trust. These trusts are deemed to be VIEs since the equity investors at
risk have no substantial decision-making rights. The Corporation does not have a significant
variable interest in these trusts. Neither the residual interest held, since it was never funded in
cash, nor the loan payable to the trusts is considered a variable interest since they create
variability.
Also, it is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage
securitization transactions, including GNMA and FNMA. These special purpose entities are deemed to
be VIEs since they lack equity investments at risk. The Corporations continuing involvement in
these guaranteed loan securitizations includes owning certain beneficial interests in the form of
securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide
additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to which it has transferred
the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent retained, are classified in the
Corporations consolidated statement of condition as available-for-sale or trading securities.
ASU 2009-17 requires that an ongoing primary beneficiary assessment should be made to determine
whether the Corporation is the primary beneficiary of any of the variable interest entities
(VIEs) it is involved with. The conclusion on the assessment of these trusts and guaranteed
mortgage securitization transactions has not changed since their initial evaluation. The
Corporation concluded that it is still not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore,
are not required to be consolidated in the Corporations financial statements at March 31, 2011.
The Corporation concluded that it did not hold a controlling financial interest in these trusts
since the decisions of the trust are predetermined through the trust documents and the guarantee of
the trust preferred securities is irrelevant since in substance the sponsor is guaranteeing its own
debt. In the case of the guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions, the Corporation concluded
that, essentially, these entities (FNMA and GNMA) control the design of their respective VIEs,
dictate the quality and nature of the
56
collateral, require the underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides
and can change them at will, and remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the
case of FNMA. Moreover, through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA and GNMA) have the
obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE.
The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the
Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency
mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label
collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of
continuing involvement. Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information on the debt securities outstanding at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31,
2010, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the Corporations
consolidated statement of condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the right to service
the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities (SPEs) and may also
purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were transferred to
those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees that the
Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs since the
servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the
mortgage-backed securities investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal
agencies.
The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the
Corporations variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a
result of the Corporations involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
107,798 |
|
|
$ |
107,313 |
|
|
$ |
108,184 |
|
|
Total servicing assets |
|
$ |
107,798 |
|
|
$ |
107,313 |
|
|
$ |
108,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing advances |
|
$ |
3,506 |
|
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
3,506 |
|
|
$ |
2,706 |
|
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
111,304 |
|
|
$ |
110,019 |
|
|
$ |
111,183 |
|
|
Maximum exposure to loss |
|
$ |
111,304 |
|
|
$ |
110,019 |
|
|
$ |
111,183 |
|
|
The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the
form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to
$9.4 billion at March 31, 2011 ($9.3 billion at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010).
Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be
incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent
and that the value of the Corporations interests and any associated collateral declines to zero,
without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss
includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances at March 31,
2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are
not included as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related
agencies.
Note 22 Fair Value Measurement:
ASC Subtopic 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in
order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The
hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these
instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. |
57
|
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted
market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs
internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest
rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is adequately representative of the
price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporations credit standing, constraints on liquidity
and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.
The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used
in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.
58
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporations assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5,674 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
5,686 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
634 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,347 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
6,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
5,237 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
5,818 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
6,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
Trading Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
3,069 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,496 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
6,536 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
7,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
61
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at |
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
at |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
1, 2011 |
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Paydowns |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
)[b] |
|
Total |
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the Statement of Operations. |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other services fees in the Statement of Operations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
held at |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
earnings/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at March |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
OCI |
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Paydowns |
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
backed-securities agencies |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
[a] |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
[b] |
|
Total |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the Statement of Operations. |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other services fees in the Statement of Operations. |
There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair
value on a recurring basis during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. There were no
transfers in and/or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
62
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters ended March 31,
2011 and 2010 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in
the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains |
|
|
gains (losses) relating |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
|
Changes in unrealized gains |
|
|
|
(losses) included |
|
|
to assets still held at |
|
|
included in |
|
|
(losses) relating to assets still |
|
(In millions) |
|
in earnings/OCI |
|
|
reporting date |
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
held at reporting date |
|
|
OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
Additionally, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation may
be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent
to their initial recognition. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific
reserves under ASC Section 310-10-35 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, or
write-downs of individual assets. The following tables present financial and non-financial assets
that were subject to a fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, and which were still included in the consolidated statement of condition
as of such dates. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate fair value measurements of those
assets as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write- |
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
downs |
|
|
Loans [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Loans held-for-sale [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other real estate owned [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the
collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. |
|
[2] |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to
loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate owned that were measured at fair value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write- |
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
downs |
|
|
Loans [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
Loans held-for-sale [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Other real estate owned [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the
collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets
in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. |
|
[2] |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to
loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate that were measured at fair value. |
Following is a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial
instruments and all non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the
financial instruments disclosed do not represent managements estimate of the underlying value of
the Corporation.
63
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields
that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities, which fair value is based on an active
exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities. The U.S. agency
securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto
Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated
and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the
evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two
sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks,
LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and
trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are priced
based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market
sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS are
classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced using
an internally-prepared pricing matrix with quoted prices from
third-party brokers dealers in Puerto Rico. These
particular MBS are classified as Level 3. |
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs) are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds
defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option
adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility
assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These CMOs are
classified as Level 2. Other CMOs, due to their limited liquidity, are classified as Level
3 due to the insufficiency of inputs such as broker quotes, executed trades, credit
information and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active
exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in
highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities, commercial paper and mutual funds (included as other in the
trading account securities category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained
from broker dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not
trade in highly liquid markets, these securities are classified as Level 2. The important
variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares are net
asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based on a
relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In
addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less
frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. |
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices.
MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayments assumptions, delinquency rates, late
charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the
unobservable nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as
forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified
as Level 2. The non-performance risk is determined using internally-developed models that consider the collateral held,
the remaining term, and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, and uses available
public data or internally-developed data related to current spreads that denote their probability
of default.
Equity appreciation instrument
The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated by determining a call option
value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal variables in determining the fair
value of the equity appreciation instrument include the implied volatility
64
determined based on the
historical daily volatility of the Corporations common stock, the exercise price of the
instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk-free rate. The equity appreciation
instrument is classified as Level 2.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Currently, the
associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments
Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were
priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounted cash
flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss
estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial
loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of
foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an
internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal
adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
Note 23 Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial
instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and
may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder
excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.
For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been
estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as managements
best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of
future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.
The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate
environment at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, as applicable. In different
interest rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain
fixed rate financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate
the value of the Corporations fee generating businesses and anticipated future business
activities, that is, they do not represent the Corporations value as a going concern. Accordingly,
the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the
Corporation. The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of significant financial
instruments are described in the paragraphs below.
Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined
maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts of other liabilities reported in the
consolidated statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of
those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this
category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, assets sold under agreements to repurchase
and short-term borrowings. The equity appreciation instrument is included in other liabilities and
is accounted for at fair value. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities are
valued using discounted cash flows based on market rates currently available for agreements with
similar terms and remaining maturities.
Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities
in the consolidated statements of condition, are financial instruments that regularly trade on
secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market
prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with
similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported
at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are
marked-to-market for accounting purposes.
65
The estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale was based on secondary market prices, bids
received from potential buyers and discounted cash flow models. The fair values of the loans
held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were
segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit
cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest
rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit
price by discounting scheduled cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate
that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market
conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the
mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair
valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its
carrying amount.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits,
savings, NOW, and money market accounts was, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount
payable on demand as of the respective dates. The fair value of certificates of deposit was based
on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on
certificates with similar maturities. The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing
parties is in part dependent of the buyers ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition
that sometimes occurs. Therefore, the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits
could vary significantly from the presented fair value.
Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using
quoted market rates for similar instruments at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31,
2010.
As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, including repurchase
agreements (regular and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, where
applicable, the collateralization levels as part of its evaluation of non-performance risk. Also,
for certificates of deposit, the non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed
models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term,
and the credit premium of the institution.
Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value.
Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was
estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters
of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements.
66
The following table presents the carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated
fair values for financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
1,426,120 |
|
|
$ |
1,426,120 |
|
|
$ |
1,431,668 |
|
|
$ |
1,431,668 |
|
|
$ |
1,596,928 |
|
|
$ |
1,596,928 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
634,799 |
|
|
|
634,799 |
|
|
|
546,713 |
|
|
|
546,713 |
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
5,686,341 |
|
|
|
5,686,341 |
|
|
|
5,236,852 |
|
|
|
5,236,852 |
|
|
|
6,535,746 |
|
|
|
6,535,746 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
142,106 |
|
|
|
147,816 |
|
|
|
122,354 |
|
|
|
120,873 |
|
|
|
209,596 |
|
|
|
207,850 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
174,930 |
|
|
|
176,336 |
|
|
|
163,513 |
|
|
|
165,233 |
|
|
|
156,864 |
|
|
|
158,375 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
569,678 |
|
|
|
573,261 |
|
|
|
893,938 |
|
|
|
902,371 |
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
|
110,253 |
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing
agreement with the FDIC |
|
|
19,949,443 |
|
|
|
17,366,967 |
|
|
|
19,934,810 |
|
|
|
17,137,805 |
|
|
|
21,801,263 |
|
|
|
19,798,779 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing
agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
4,720,391 |
|
|
|
4,546,937 |
|
|
|
4,836,882 |
|
|
|
4,744,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
2,325,618 |
|
|
|
2,402,915 |
|
|
|
2,311,997 |
|
|
|
2,376,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
27,196,674 |
|
|
$ |
27,307,249 |
|
|
$ |
26,762,200 |
|
|
$ |
26,873,408 |
|
|
$ |
25,360,312 |
|
|
$ |
25,491,135 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,642,800 |
|
|
|
2,769,537 |
|
|
|
2,412,550 |
|
|
|
2,503,320 |
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
2,618,208 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
290,302 |
|
|
|
290,302 |
|
|
|
364,222 |
|
|
|
364,222 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,794,655 |
|
|
|
3,683,920 |
|
|
|
4,170,183 |
|
|
|
4,067,818 |
|
|
|
2,529,092 |
|
|
|
2,386,871 |
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
6,709,614 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
|
$ |
5,879,051 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
6,744,092 |
|
|
$ |
3,805 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
146,475 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
152,596 |
|
|
|
3,318 |
|
|
|
142,772 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
Note 24 Net Income (Loss) per Common Share:
The following table sets forth the computation of net income (loss) per common share (EPS), basic
and diluted, for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
1,021,536,201 |
|
|
|
639,003,599 |
|
Average potential dilutive common shares |
|
|
802,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
1,022,339,095 |
|
|
|
639,003,599 |
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the
potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount of
compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise
date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is
added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings
per share. Warrants, stock options, and restricted stock awards that result in lower potential
shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the
computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect
in earnings per common share.
For quarter ended March 31, 2011, there were 2,121,618 weighted average antidilutive stock options
outstanding (March 31, 2010 2,552,663). Additionally, the Corporation has outstanding a warrant
issued to the U.S. Treasury to purchase 20,932,836 shares of common stock, which have an antidilutive effect at March 31, 2011.
67
Note 25 Other Service Fees:
The caption of other services fees in the consolidated statements of operations consist of the
following major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Debit card fees |
|
$ |
12,925 |
|
|
$ |
26,593 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,926 |
|
|
|
10,990 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
10,576 |
|
|
|
23,297 |
|
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
7,130 |
|
|
|
7,167 |
|
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments |
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
11,359 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
13,962 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
Total other services fees |
|
$ |
58,652 |
|
|
$ |
101,320 |
|
|
Note 26 Pension and Postretirement Benefits:
The Corporation has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan and supplementary benefit
pension plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. At March 31, 2011, the accrual
of benefits under the plans was frozen to all participants.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan |
|
|
Benefit Restoration Plans |
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
7,785 |
|
|
$ |
7,953 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(10,840 |
) |
|
|
(7,776 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
2,828 |
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
Total net periodic pension (benefit) cost |
|
|
($227 |
) |
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation made contributions to the pension and
benefit restoration plans amounting to $124.6 million. The total contributions expected to be paid
during the year 2011 for the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to approximately $126.7
million.
The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of certain
subsidiaries. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
Amortization of net loss (gain) |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
Total net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan
amounted to approximately $2.0 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the year
2011 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $6.6 million.
68
Note 27- Stock-Based Compensation:
The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the Stock Option Plan), which permitted the
granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or
non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders
adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which replaced and
superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original
terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.
Stock Option Plan
Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate
in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the
absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock
Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.s common stock at a price equal
to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to
be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The
Corporations policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each
grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement
provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional
20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of
employment due to retirement.
The following table presents information on stock options outstanding at March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price of |
|
|
Life of Options |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Range per Share |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding in Years |
|
|
(fully vested) |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
$14.39 - $18.50 |
|
|
1,023,453 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
1,023,453 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
$19.25 - $27.20 |
|
|
1,098,165 |
|
|
$ |
25.27 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
1,098,165 |
|
|
$ |
25.27 |
|
|
$14.39 - $27.20 |
|
|
2,121,618 |
|
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
2,121,618 |
|
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding at March 31, 2011 and 2010. There was no
intrinsic value of options exercisable at March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(277,497 |
) |
|
|
20.43 |
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,275,166 |
|
|
$ |
20.67 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(153,548 |
) |
|
|
19.97 |
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2,121,618 |
|
|
$ |
20.72 |
|
|
The stock options exercisable at March 31, 2011 totaled 2,121,618 (March 31, 2010
2,552,663). There were no stock options exercised during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
2010. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarters ended March 31,
2011 and 2010.
There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during
2010 and 2011.
There was no stock option expense recognized for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
69
Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards,
Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board).
Employees and directors of the Corporation and/or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan.
Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based
on the employees continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the
compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong
vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant
and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and
10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after
attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members
of management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
138,512 |
|
|
$ |
23.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,525,416 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(340,879 |
) |
|
|
7.87 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(191,313 |
) |
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,131,736 |
|
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
Granted |
|
|
922,574 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(17,348 |
) |
|
|
20.06 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
2,034,962 |
|
|
$ |
3.32 |
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, 922,574 shares of restricted stock were awarded to
management under the Incentive Plan, consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final
Rule. The shares of restricted stock, which were awarded to management consistent with the
requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule, were determined upon consideration of managements
execution of critical 2009 initiatives to manage the Corporations liquidity and capitalization,
strategically reposition its United States operations, and improve management effectiveness and
cost control. The shares will vest on the secondary anniversary of the grant date, and they may
become transferrable in 25% increments as the Corporation repays each 25% portion of the aggregate
financial assistance received under the United States Treasury Departments Capital Purchase
Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. In addition, the grants are also
subject to further performance criteria as the Corporation must achieve profitability for at least
one fiscal year for awards to be payable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, 962,373 shares
of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which 937,712 shares
were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule.
Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to
restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance share awards consist of the
opportunity to receive shares of Popular Inc.s common stock provided that the Corporation achieves
certain performance goals during a three-year performance cycle. The compensation cost associated
with the performance shares is recorded ratably over a three-year performance period. The
performance shares are granted at the end of the three-year period and vest at grant date, except
when the participants employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause. In such case, the
participant would receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as if the Corporation would have
met the performance goal for the performance period. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, no
shares were granted under this plan (March 31, 2010 12,426).
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation recognized $0.5 million of restricted
stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million (March 31,
2010 $0.3 million, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million). The fair market value of the restricted
stock vested was $0.5 million at grant date and $0.1 million at vesting date. This triggers a
shortfall, net of windfalls, of $0.4 million that was recorded as an additional income tax expense
at the applicable income tax rate.
70
No additional income tax expense was recorded for the U.S. employees due to the valuation allowance
of the deferred tax asset. There was no performance share expense recognized for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 (March 31, 2010 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $60 thousand). The total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares
to members of management at March 31, 2011 was $4.3 million and is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2 years.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members
of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
305,898 |
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(305,898 |
) |
|
|
2.95 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
23,284 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(23,284 |
) |
|
|
3.35 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation granted 23,284 shares of restricted
stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became vested at grant
date (March 31, 2010 35,133). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.1 million of
restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $35
thousand (March 31, 2010 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $47 thousand). The fair value at
vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 for directors
was $78 thousand.
Note 28 Income Taxes:
The reasons for the difference between the income tax expense (benefit) applicable to income before
income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico are included
in the table that follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
income |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
income |
|
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
47,207 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
($38,628 |
) |
|
|
41 |
% |
Net reversal (benefit) of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
(2,407 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12,231 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
33,280 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions |
|
|
(2,464 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate |
|
|
103,287 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes and others |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Income tax
expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
147,227 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
($9,275 |
) |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
On January 31, 2011, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law a new Internal Revenue Code
for Puerto Rico (the 2011 Tax Code) which resulted in a reduction in the Corporations net
deferred tax asset with a corresponding charge to income tax expense of $103.3 million due to a
reduction in the marginal corporate income tax rate. Under the provisions of the 2011 Tax Code, the
maximum marginal corporate income tax rate is 30% for years commenced after December 31, 2010.
Prior to the 2011 Tax Code, the maximum marginal corporate income tax rate in Puerto Rico was 39%,
which had increased to 40.95% due to a temporary 5% surtax approved in March 2009 for years
beginning on January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011. The 2011 Tax Code, however, eliminated the
special 5% surtax on corporations for tax year 2011. Under the new tax code, the Corporation has an
irrevocable one-time election to defer the application of the 2011 Tax Code for five years. This
election must be made with the filing of the 2011 income tax return.
71
The following table presents the components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward |
|
$ |
6,824 |
|
|
$ |
5,833 |
|
Net operating loss and donation carryforward available |
|
|
1,206,190 |
|
|
|
1,222,717 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
93,147 |
|
|
|
131,508 |
|
Deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
8,322 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
302,380 |
|
|
|
393,289 |
|
Deferred gains |
|
|
12,700 |
|
|
|
13,056 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
|
7,108 |
|
Intercompany deferred gains |
|
|
5,036 |
|
|
|
5,480 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
21,767 |
|
|
|
26,063 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,661,238 |
|
|
|
1,813,376 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between the assigned values and the tax bases of assets and liabilities recognized in
purchase business combinations |
|
|
29,247 |
|
|
|
31,846 |
|
Difference in outside basis between financial and tax reporting on sale of a business |
|
|
11,692 |
|
|
|
11,120 |
|
FDIC-assisted transaction |
|
|
68,146 |
|
|
|
64,049 |
|
Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities |
|
|
45,213 |
|
|
|
52,186 |
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
6,911 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
160,683 |
|
|
|
167,504 |
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
1,262,171 |
|
|
|
1,268,589 |
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
238,384 |
|
|
$ |
377,283 |
|
|
The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above at March 31, 2011 is reflected in the
consolidated statements of condition as $251 million in net deferred tax assets (in the Other
assets caption) (December 31, 2010 $388 million) and $13 million in deferred tax liabilities in
the Other liabilities caption (December 31, 2010 $11 million), reflecting the aggregate
deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying subsidiaries of the Corporation.
A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all
available evidence; it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or
the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to
reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available
evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets,
including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of
sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The
analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset,
including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income
exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback
years and tax-planning strategies.
The Corporations U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year
period ended March 31, 2011. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets
in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position is considered significant negative
evidence and has caused management to conclude that it is more likely than not that the Corporation
will not be able to realize the associated deferred tax assets in the future. At March 31, 2011,
the Corporation recorded a valuation allowance of approximately $1.3 billion on the deferred tax
assets of its U.S. operations.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporations deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations
amounted to $260 million. The Corporation assessed the realization of the Puerto Rico portion of
the net deferred tax asset based on the weighting of all available evidence. The Corporations
Puerto Rico Banking operation is in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended
March 31, 2011. This situation is mainly due to the performance of the construction loan portfolio,
including the charges related to the proposed sale of the portfolio. Currently, a significant
portion of the construction loan portfolio has been written-down to fair value
72
based on a bid received. The Corporations banking operations in Puerto Rico have a very strong
earnings history, and it is managements view, based on that history, that the event causing this
loss is not a continuing condition of the operations. Accordingly, there is enough positive
evidence to outweigh the negative evidence of the cumulative loss. Based on this evidence, the
Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset will be
realized. Management reassesses the realization of the deferred tax assets each reporting period.
The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
Additions for tax positions January through March |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Reduction as a result of settlements January through March |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
27.9 |
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the related accrued interest approximated $6.6 million (March 31, 2010 -
$6.5 million). Management determined that at March 31, 2011 and 2010 there was no need to accrue
for the payment of penalties.
After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized,
would affect the Corporations effective tax rate, was approximately $30 million at March 31, 2011
(March 31, 2010 $33.0 million).
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. At March
31, 2011, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction: 2008
and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2006 and thereafter. The Corporation
anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months,
which could amount to approximately $8 million.
Note 29 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Additional disclosures on cash flow information and non-cash activities for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 are listed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
$ |
39,443 |
|
|
$ |
32,032 |
|
Loans transferred to other property |
|
|
7,117 |
|
|
|
9,733 |
|
|
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
|
46,560 |
|
|
|
41,765 |
|
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale |
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
20,248 |
|
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
24,558 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Loans securitized into investment securities [1] |
|
|
328,592 |
|
|
|
205,056 |
|
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
6,297 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes loan securitized into trading securities and subsequently sold before quarter end. |
73
Note 30 Segment Reporting:
The Corporations corporate structure consists of two reportable segments Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America.
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% ownership interest in EVERTEC,
which included the merchant acquiring business of BPPR. EVERTEC was reported as a reportable
segment prior to such date, while the merchant acquiring business was originally included in the
BPPR reportable segment through June 30, 2010. As a result of the sale, the Corporation no longer
presents EVERTEC as a reportable segment and therefore, historical financial information for the
processing and merchant acquiring businesses has been reclassified under the Corporate group for
all periods presented. Additionally, the Corporation retained Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red
Tranred, C.A. (TRANRED) (formerly EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA,
C.A). and its equity investments in
Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Serfinsa, which were included in the
EVERTEC reportable segment through June 30, 2010. The results for TRANRED and the equity
investments are included in the Corporate group for all periods presented. In March 2011, the
Corporation recorded $8.6 million in operating expenses because of the write-off of its investment
in TRANRED as the Corporation determined to wind-down these operations. Also, in March 2011, the
Corporation completed the sale of its equity investment in (CONTADO) with a positive impact in
first quarter earnings of $16.7 million. Revenue from the 49% ownership interest in EVERTEC is
reported as non-interest income in the Corporate group.
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the
organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on
the products and services offered by the segments.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:
Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporations
results of operations and total assets at March 31, 2011, additional disclosures are provided for
the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:
|
|
|
Commercial banking represents the Corporations banking operations conducted at BPPR,
which are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes
aspects of the lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory
services. BPPR allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer
pricing at market rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of
excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
|
|
Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus
on retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as
the lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto
and lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage
loan originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related
with the investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate
share of the investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
|
|
Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR,
the brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance
agency and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular
Risk Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these
subsidiaries generate profits based on fee income. |
Banco Popular North America:
Banco Popular North Americas reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA,
E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through
a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNAs deposit gathering
through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this
subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment
and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.
The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North
America and Popular International Bank. Also, as discussed previously, it includes the results of
EVERTEC for all periods presented. The Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain
corporate areas that are identified as critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and
Legal.
74
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the
Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates,
resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.
The following tables present the results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
(In thousands) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
Intersegment Eliminations |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
295,445 |
|
|
$ |
74,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
67,256 |
|
|
|
8,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
121,727 |
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,632 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
188,730 |
|
|
|
58,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
146,144 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
$ |
22,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
29,359,421 |
|
|
$ |
8,975,972 |
|
|
$ |
(26,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
(In thousands) |
|
Reportable Segments |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
$ |
370,259 |
|
|
$ |
(27,207 |
) |
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
343,359 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
139,144 |
|
|
|
42,242 |
|
|
|
(17,018 |
) |
|
|
164,368 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,060 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,239 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
246,957 |
|
|
|
23,093 |
|
|
|
(17,555 |
) |
|
|
252,495 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
147,082 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
147,227 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
25,928 |
|
|
$ |
(16,337 |
) |
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
38,309,058 |
|
|
$ |
5,459,100 |
|
|
$ |
(5,031,891 |
) |
|
$ |
38,736,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
Intersegment Eliminations |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
219,297 |
|
|
$ |
78,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
108,372 |
|
|
|
131,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
88,669 |
|
|
|
16,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,275 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
165,478 |
|
|
|
63,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
24,251 |
|
|
$ |
(104,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
23,161,869 |
|
|
$ |
10,399,867 |
|
|
$ |
(56,180 |
) |
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
Total Reportable Segments |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
|
Net interest income (loss) |
|
$ |
298,151 |
|
|
$ |
(29,396 |
) |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
268,917 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
105,228 |
|
|
|
85,663 |
|
|
|
(33,025 |
) |
|
|
157,866 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
11,706 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
229,106 |
|
|
|
67,372 |
|
|
|
(33,553 |
) |
|
|
262,925 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(9,369 |
) |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(79,919 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,609 |
) |
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
33,505,556 |
|
|
$ |
5,451,963 |
|
|
$ |
(5,125,082 |
) |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
Financial Services |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
de Puerto Rico |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
119,560 |
|
|
$ |
173,470 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
295,445 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
27,895 |
|
|
|
39,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,256 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
45,358 |
|
|
|
54,901 |
|
|
|
21,523 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
121,727 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,632 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
54,908 |
|
|
|
118,227 |
|
|
|
15,650 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
188,730 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
76,840 |
|
|
|
66,844 |
|
|
|
2,444 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
146,144 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
(2,471 |
) |
|
$ |
5,411 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
3,596 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
15,518,756 |
|
|
$ |
21,280,611 |
|
|
$ |
459,462 |
|
|
$ |
(7,899,408 |
) |
|
$ |
29,359,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and Retail |
|
|
Other Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
(In thousands) |
Commercial Banking |
|
Banking |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
de Puerto Rico |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
71,062 |
|
|
$ |
145,666 |
|
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
219,297 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
73,171 |
|
|
|
35,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,372 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
25,524 |
|
|
|
42,853 |
|
|
|
20,114 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
88,669 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,962 |
|
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,275 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
46,485 |
|
|
|
104,831 |
|
|
|
14,234 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
165,478 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(14,812 |
) |
|
|
10,963 |
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,796 |
) |
|
$ |
31,732 |
|
|
$ |
5,128 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
24,251 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
9,330,813 |
|
|
$ |
17,069,123 |
|
|
$ |
426,524 |
|
|
$ |
(3,664,591 |
) |
|
$ |
23,161,869 |
|
|
76
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segments are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
74,300 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,814 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,063 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
17,374 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
680 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
55,955 |
|
|
|
2,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,227 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
Net income ( loss) |
|
$ |
31,505 |
|
|
$ |
(9,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,332 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
9,645,089 |
|
|
$ |
474,834 |
|
|
$ |
(1,143,951 |
) |
|
$ |
8,975,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
|
E-LOAN |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
77,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,534 |
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
78,854 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
119,706 |
|
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,828 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
18,185 |
|
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,559 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
61,721 |
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,628 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(89,742 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,372 |
) |
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
(104,170 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
11,040,381 |
|
|
$ |
526,937 |
|
|
$ |
(1,167,451 |
) |
|
$ |
10,399,867 |
|
|
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Revenues [1]: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
396,249 |
|
|
$ |
308,580 |
|
United States |
|
|
88,404 |
|
|
|
89,638 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,074 |
|
|
|
28,565 |
|
|
Total consolidated revenues from continuing operations |
|
$ |
507,727 |
|
|
$ |
426,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Total revenues include net interest income, service charges on deposit accounts, other
service fees, net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities, trading
account profit, net gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale,
adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold, FDIC loss share income, fair value change in
equity appreciation instrument and other operating income. |
77
Selected Balance Sheet Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
28,488,973 |
|
|
$ |
22,035,181 |
|
Loans |
|
|
18,723,166 |
|
|
|
13,989,155 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
19,524,566 |
|
|
|
16,383,261 |
|
United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,098,562 |
|
|
$ |
10,569,801 |
|
Loans |
|
|
6,483,596 |
|
|
|
8,370,929 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
6,570,511 |
|
|
|
7,874,502 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,148,732 |
|
|
$ |
1,227,455 |
|
Loans |
|
|
769,255 |
|
|
|
824,627 |
|
Deposits [1] |
|
|
1,101,597 |
|
|
|
1,102,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the US and British Virgin Islands. |
Note 31 Subsequent Events:
Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized
in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent
to March 31, 2011. Such evaluation resulted in no adjustments or additional disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Note 32 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered
Guaranteed Securities:
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) (parent only), Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI),
Popular North America, Inc. (PNA) and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation at March 31,
2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and cash flows for
periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
PIBI is an operating subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries: Popular Insurance V.I., Inc; Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A.; and PNA.
Prior to the internal reorganization and sale of the ownership interest in EVERTEC, ATH Costa Rica
S.A., and T.I.I. Smart Solutions Inc. were also wholly-owned subsidiaries of PIBI.
PNA is an operating subsidiary of PIBI and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Equity One, Inc.; and Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiaries
Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc.
PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.
A source of income for the Holding Company consists of dividends from BPPR. BPPR and BPNA must
obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends
declared by each entity during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that
year, as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the
preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any
preferred stock. The payment of dividends by BPPR may also be affected by other regulatory
requirements and policies, such as the maintenance of certain minimum capital levels. Subject to
the Federal Reserves ability to establish more stringent specific requirements under its
supervisory or enforcement authority, at March 31, 2011, BPPR could have declared a dividend of
approximately $70 million (March 31, 2010 $81 million; December 31, 2010 $78 million). BPNA could not declare any dividends without the approval of the Federal
Reserve Board.
78
Condensed Consolidating Statement Of Condition (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
subsidiaries and |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,836 |
|
|
$ |
40,583 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
464,790 |
|
|
$ |
(43,329 |
) |
|
$ |
464,555 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
961,497 |
|
|
|
(8,523 |
) |
|
|
961,565 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,799 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
37,363 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,663,205 |
|
|
|
(18,125 |
) |
|
|
5,686,341 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
209,734 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,372 |
|
|
|
(185,000 |
) |
|
|
142,106 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
159,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,930 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,846,966 |
|
|
|
1,104,183 |
|
|
|
1,595,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,546,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569,678 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
330,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,746,496 |
|
|
|
(295,155 |
) |
|
|
20,781,549 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,729,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,729,550 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,760 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
736,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
736,505 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
330,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,634,841 |
|
|
|
(295,155 |
) |
|
|
24,669,834 |
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,325,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,325,618 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
540,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,577 |
|
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,888 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with
the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,562 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
145,365 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
147,670 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,416 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
257,598 |
|
|
|
73,935 |
|
|
|
15,669 |
|
|
|
1,000,480 |
|
|
|
(25,782 |
) |
|
|
1,321,900 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647,387 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,441 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,700,216 |
|
|
$ |
1,230,880 |
|
|
$ |
1,617,429 |
|
|
$ |
38,310,010 |
|
|
$ |
(7,122,268 |
) |
|
$ |
38,736,267 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,981,103 |
|
|
$ |
(68,094 |
) |
|
$ |
4,913,009 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,292,338 |
|
|
|
(8,673 |
) |
|
|
22,283,665 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,273,441 |
|
|
|
(76,767 |
) |
|
|
27,196,674 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,642,800 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,400 |
|
|
|
514,902 |
|
|
|
(267,000 |
) |
|
|
290,302 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
741,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,189 |
|
|
|
2,625,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,794,655 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
(185,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
153,626 |
|
|
$ |
7,636 |
|
|
|
44,345 |
|
|
|
847,923 |
|
|
|
(46,600 |
) |
|
|
1,006,930 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
895,310 |
|
|
|
7,636 |
|
|
|
513,934 |
|
|
|
34,089,848 |
|
|
|
(575,367 |
) |
|
|
34,931,361 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
10,236 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51,564 |
|
|
|
(55,632 |
) |
|
|
10,236 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
4,087,718 |
|
|
|
4,092,743 |
|
|
|
4,066,208 |
|
|
|
5,857,287 |
|
|
|
(14,007,711 |
) |
|
|
4,096,245 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(329,599 |
) |
|
|
(2,869,853 |
) |
|
|
(2,985,273 |
) |
|
|
(1,699,949 |
) |
|
|
7,546,548 |
|
|
|
(338,126 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(607 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(13,002 |
) |
|
|
(3,712 |
) |
|
|
22,558 |
|
|
|
11,260 |
|
|
|
(30,106 |
) |
|
|
(13,002 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
3,804,906 |
|
|
|
1,223,244 |
|
|
|
1,103,495 |
|
|
|
4,220,162 |
|
|
|
(6,546,901 |
) |
|
|
3,804,906 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,700,216 |
|
|
$ |
1,230,880 |
|
|
$ |
1,617,429 |
|
|
$ |
38,310,010 |
|
|
$ |
(7,122,268 |
) |
|
$ |
38,736,267 |
|
|
79
Condensed Consolidating Statement Of Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
subsidiaries and |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
451,723 |
|
|
$ |
(3,182 |
) |
|
$ |
452,373 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7,512 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
979,232 |
|
|
|
(7,711 |
) |
|
|
979,295 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546,713 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
35,263 |
|
|
|
3,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,216,013 |
|
|
|
(18,287 |
) |
|
|
5,236,852 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
210,872 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,482 |
|
|
|
(185,000 |
) |
|
|
122,354 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
148,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,513 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,836,258 |
|
|
|
1,096,907 |
|
|
|
1,578,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,512,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893,938 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
476,082 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,798,876 |
|
|
|
(441,967 |
) |
|
|
20,834,276 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,836,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,836,882 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,241 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
793,225 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
476,022 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,736,352 |
|
|
|
(441,967 |
) |
|
|
24,771,692 |
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311,997 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
542,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545,453 |
|
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,496 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with
the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,565 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
149,101 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
150,658 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,907 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
246,209 |
|
|
|
86,116 |
|
|
|
15,105 |
|
|
|
1,134,056 |
|
|
|
(25,413 |
) |
|
|
1,456,073 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647,387 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,696 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,822,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,653 |
|
|
$ |
38,296,775 |
|
|
$ |
(7,193,808 |
) |
|
$ |
38,722,962 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,961,417 |
|
|
$ |
(22,096 |
) |
|
$ |
4,939,321 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,830,669 |
|
|
|
(7,790 |
) |
|
|
21,822,879 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,792,086 |
|
|
|
(29,886 |
) |
|
|
26,762,200 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,412,550 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,500 |
|
|
|
743,922 |
|
|
|
(412,200 |
) |
|
|
364,222 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
835,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,121 |
|
|
|
2,905,554 |
|
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
|
|
4,170,183 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
(185,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
185,683 |
|
|
$ |
3,921 |
|
|
|
47,169 |
|
|
|
1,028,614 |
|
|
|
(52,111 |
) |
|
|
1,213,276 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,021,476 |
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
509,790 |
|
|
|
34,067,726 |
|
|
|
(680,482 |
) |
|
|
34,922,431 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51,633 |
|
|
|
(55,701 |
) |
|
|
10,229 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
4,085,478 |
|
|
|
4,158,157 |
|
|
|
4,066,208 |
|
|
|
5,862,091 |
|
|
|
(14,077,929 |
) |
|
|
4,094,005 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(338,801 |
) |
|
|
(2,958,347 |
) |
|
|
(3,000,682 |
) |
|
|
(1,714,659 |
) |
|
|
7,665,161 |
|
|
|
(347,328 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(574 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
|
(10,462 |
) |
|
|
25,335 |
|
|
|
29,984 |
|
|
|
(44,857 |
) |
|
|
(5,961 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
3,800,531 |
|
|
|
1,193,414 |
|
|
|
1,090,863 |
|
|
|
4,229,049 |
|
|
|
(6,513,326 |
) |
|
|
3,800,531 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,822,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,197,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,653 |
|
|
$ |
38,296,775 |
|
|
$ |
(7,193,808 |
) |
|
$ |
38,722,962 |
|
|
80
Condensed Consolidating Statement Of Condition (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
and eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
592,482 |
|
|
$ |
(1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
1,004,654 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
1,004,753 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,149 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,533,693 |
|
|
|
(1,625 |
) |
|
|
6,535,746 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
395,783 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,563 |
|
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
209,596 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
141,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,864 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
2,988,199 |
|
|
|
693,198 |
|
|
|
1,130,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,812,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
77,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,180,571 |
|
|
|
(68,160 |
) |
|
|
23,189,598 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,299 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,276,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,036 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
77,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,792,296 |
|
|
|
(68,160 |
) |
|
|
21,801,263 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
576,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,451 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,887 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
131,094 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
131,243 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173,359 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
35,328 |
|
|
|
79,585 |
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
|
|
1,293,165 |
|
|
|
(45,967 |
) |
|
|
1,380,428 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,762 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,511,764 |
|
|
$ |
778,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,827 |
|
|
$ |
33,688,210 |
|
|
$ |
(5,300,456 |
) |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,478,119 |
|
|
$ |
(1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
4,476,255 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,884,576 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
20,884,057 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,362,695 |
|
|
|
(2,383 |
) |
|
|
25,360,312 |
|
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,491,506 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
|
82,323 |
|
|
|
(68,160 |
) |
|
|
23,263 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
994,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,914 |
|
|
|
1,103,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,529,092 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
30,086 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
46,075 |
|
|
|
912,685 |
|
|
|
(47,831 |
) |
|
|
941,063 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,024,563 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
486,089 |
|
|
|
30,322,910 |
|
|
|
(488,374 |
) |
|
|
31,345,236 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,797,328 |
|
|
|
3,497,438 |
|
|
|
3,381,208 |
|
|
|
4,697,181 |
|
|
|
(11,568,917 |
) |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(370,897 |
) |
|
|
(2,700,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,729,863 |
) |
|
|
(1,422,759 |
) |
|
|
6,846,537 |
|
|
|
(377,807 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
(22,530 |
) |
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
|
38,556 |
|
|
|
(33,417 |
) |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
|
778,044 |
|
|
|
668,738 |
|
|
|
3,365,300 |
|
|
|
(4,812,082 |
) |
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,511,764 |
|
|
$ |
778,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,827 |
|
|
$ |
33,688,210 |
|
|
$ |
(5,300,456 |
) |
|
$ |
33,832,437 |
|
|
81
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
All other subsidiaries |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
and eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
3,020 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
422,726 |
|
|
$ |
(2,387 |
) |
|
$ |
423,375 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
947 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
51,379 |
|
|
|
(3,222 |
) |
|
|
52,375 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
Total interest |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
483,828 |
|
|
|
(5,648 |
) |
|
|
485,451 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,040 |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
76,879 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
15,556 |
|
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
|
|
14,015 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
25,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
20,978 |
|
|
|
(2,928 |
) |
|
|
51,198 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
25,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
|
113,574 |
|
|
|
(4,966 |
) |
|
|
142,092 |
|
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
(18,420 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(7,832 |
) |
|
|
370,254 |
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
343,359 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan
Losses |
|
|
(18,420 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(7,832 |
) |
|
|
294,935 |
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
268,040 |
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,630 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,040 |
|
|
|
(3,388 |
) |
|
|
58,652 |
|
Trading account loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans
sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,848 |
) |
FDIC loss share income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,745 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
18,185 |
|
|
|
19,944 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
12,875 |
|
|
|
(13,291 |
) |
|
|
39,409 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
18,185 |
|
|
|
19,944 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
141,222 |
|
|
|
(16,679 |
) |
|
|
164,368 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
5,904 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,611 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,529 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,140 |
|
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22,886 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
24,586 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,036 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,972 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
62,424 |
|
|
|
(18,589 |
) |
|
|
46,688 |
|
Communications |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,860 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,673 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,239 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(11,501 |
) |
|
|
8,468 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
28,380 |
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
24,956 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
8,654 |
|
|
|
8,592 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
275,890 |
|
|
|
(18,205 |
) |
|
|
275,049 |
|
|
(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings
of subsidiaries |
|
|
(8,889 |
) |
|
|
11,391 |
|
|
|
(6,254 |
) |
|
|
160,267 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
157,359 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
141,699 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
147,227 |
|
|
(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
(10,915 |
) |
|
|
7,929 |
|
|
|
(5,990 |
) |
|
|
18,568 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
10,132 |
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
21,047 |
|
|
|
16,665 |
|
|
|
21,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
$ |
24,594 |
|
|
$ |
15,409 |
|
|
$ |
18,568 |
|
|
$ |
(58,571 |
) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
82
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
and eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
87,400 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($94,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
354,508 |
|
|
|
(802 |
) |
|
$ |
354,649 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
1,042 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
7,166 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
64,512 |
|
|
|
(6,842 |
) |
|
|
64,926 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,578 |
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
|
95,509 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
426,640 |
|
|
|
(102,756 |
) |
|
|
427,195 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,186 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
92,974 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15,986 |
|
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
15,259 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
30,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
19,155 |
|
|
|
(7,020 |
) |
|
|
50,045 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
30,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,706 |
|
|
|
128,327 |
|
|
|
(8,018 |
) |
|
|
158,278 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
65,246 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
|
|
298,313 |
|
|
|
(94,738 |
) |
|
|
268,917 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,246 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
|
|
58,113 |
|
|
|
(94,738 |
) |
|
|
28,717 |
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,578 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,878 |
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
101,320 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Trading account loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans
sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,290 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
11,233 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
Total non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
(1,226 |
) |
|
|
151,325 |
|
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
157,866 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
5,434 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,424 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
95,873 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,311 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
6,187 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,735 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
120,932 |
|
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
28,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,876 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,453 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,304 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
24,290 |
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
27,049 |
|
Communications |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,295 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,703 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(10,933 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
35,692 |
|
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
24,245 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
281,362 |
|
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
280,913 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
66,504 |
|
|
|
14,269 |
|
|
|
(8,963 |
) |
|
|
(71,924 |
) |
|
|
(94,216 |
) |
|
|
(94,330 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,477 |
) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
66,527 |
|
|
|
14,259 |
|
|
|
(8,963 |
) |
|
|
(62,447 |
) |
|
|
(94,431 |
) |
|
|
(85,055 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(151,582 |
) |
|
|
(109,382 |
) |
|
|
(93,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
|
($95,123 |
) |
|
|
($102,344 |
) |
|
|
($62,447 |
) |
|
$ |
259,914 |
|
|
|
($85,055 |
) |
|
83
Condensed Consolidating Statement Of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
and eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
$ |
24,594 |
|
|
$ |
15,409 |
|
|
$ |
18,568 |
|
|
|
($58,571 |
) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
(21,047 |
) |
|
|
(16,665 |
) |
|
|
(21,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,060 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
Impairment losses on net assets to be disposed of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,564 |
|
Fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,171 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred fees (accretion of discounts) |
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(94,119 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(88,327 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,745 |
) |
FDIC loss share income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,621 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,673 |
|
Net gain on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
Gain on sale of equity method investment |
|
|
(5,308 |
) |
|
|
(11,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,666 |
) |
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(11,881 |
) |
|
|
(6,540 |
) |
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,290 |
|
|
|
(6,826 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184,641 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,780 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,448 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,222 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
2,988 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
(10,801 |
) |
|
|
(4,019 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in interest payable |
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
(2,955 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,474 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
140,915 |
|
Net decrease in pension and other postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,957 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(15,200 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(2,338 |
) |
|
|
(23,946 |
) |
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
(38,203 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(48,811 |
) |
|
|
(25,377 |
) |
|
|
(22,148 |
) |
|
|
(28,872 |
) |
|
|
64,820 |
|
|
|
(60,388 |
) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(38,679 |
) |
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
(6,739 |
) |
|
|
(10,304 |
) |
|
|
6,249 |
|
|
|
(50,256 |
) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
17,734 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
17,730 |
|
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(752,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(752,479 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(24,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,998 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,305 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of
investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,274 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
25,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,335 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,050 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
145,874 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,082 |
|
|
|
(145,527 |
) |
|
|
427,622 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,387 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348,226 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
|
(10,755 |
) |
|
|
41,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,068 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,599 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,763 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,648 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
136,079 |
|
|
|
42,262 |
|
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(180,677 |
) |
|
|
(144,715 |
) |
|
|
(148,113 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480,386 |
|
|
|
(46,881 |
) |
|
|
433,505 |
|
Net increase in assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,250 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,900 |
|
|
|
(229,020 |
) |
|
|
145,200 |
|
|
|
(73,920 |
) |
Payments of notes payable and subordinated notes |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(519,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(622,568 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,000 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(930 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(97,202 |
) |
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
204,048 |
|
|
|
98,319 |
|
|
|
210,551 |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
39,965 |
|
|
|
(901 |
) |
|
|
13,067 |
|
|
|
(40,147 |
) |
|
|
12,182 |
|
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
451,723 |
|
|
|
(3,182 |
) |
|
|
452,373 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
1,836 |
|
|
$ |
40,583 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
464,790 |
|
|
|
($43,329 |
) |
|
$ |
464,555 |
|
|
84
Condensed Consolidating Statement Of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
PIBI |
|
|
PNA |
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
Elimination |
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
Holding Co. |
|
|
and eliminations |
|
|
entries |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
|
$ |
(95,123 |
) |
|
$ |
(102,344 |
) |
|
$ |
(62,447 |
) |
|
$ |
259,914 |
|
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
151,582 |
|
|
|
109,381 |
|
|
|
93,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,391 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
Fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred fees (accretion of
discounts) |
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
12,966 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
(Earnings) losses from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(1,909 |
) |
|
|
(6,563 |
) |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(7,716 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,359 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(20,168 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,868 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,436 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,654 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,975 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(5,238 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
Net decrease
(increase) in other assets |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
(9,719 |
) |
|
|
(2,065 |
) |
|
|
(9,726 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in interest payable |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
(15,860 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(16,357 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
(5,515 |
) |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
(5,983 |
) |
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
151,643 |
|
|
|
102,952 |
|
|
|
96,923 |
|
|
|
253,436 |
|
|
|
(354,755 |
) |
|
|
250,199 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
66,588 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
|
190,989 |
|
|
|
(94,841 |
) |
|
|
165,144 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,796 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
(55,819 |
) |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(208,004 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(25,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,844 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,191 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,676 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
85,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,446 |
|
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
35,229 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,476 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
32,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,953 |
|
|
|
(58,665 |
) |
|
|
398,734 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,611 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,049 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,707 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,905 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
32,260 |
|
|
|
(4,204 |
) |
|
|
(59,981 |
) |
|
|
590,674 |
|
|
|
5,516 |
|
|
|
564,265 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(620,976 |
) |
|
|
56,384 |
|
|
|
(564,592 |
) |
Net decrease in assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,284 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(24,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
(24,903 |
) |
|
|
56,665 |
|
|
|
15,937 |
|
Payments of notes payable and subordinated notes |
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(108,624 |
) |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
(124,624 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
|
|
94,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(99,226 |
) |
|
|
(3,900 |
) |
|
|
65,400 |
|
|
|
(866,787 |
) |
|
|
89,949 |
|
|
|
(814,564 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(85,124 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(85,155 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
677,606 |
|
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
|
$ |
592,482 |
|
|
|
($1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
592,175 |
|
|
85
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This report includes managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the consolidated financial
position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular). All
accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be
considered an integral part of this analysis.
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the
supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation
has operations in Puerto Rico, the continental United States, and the U.S. and British Virgin
Islands. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through
its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and
equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance
services through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco
Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts
and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York,
California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for
the benefit of BPNA. As part of the rebranding of the BPNA franchise, some of its branches operate
under a new name, Popular Community Bank. Note 30 to the consolidated financial statements presents
information about the Corporations business segments. The Corporation has a 49% interest in
EVERTEC, which provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America.
Two major transactions effected in 2010 contribute to various significant changes in the
Corporations financial results for the periods presented in these financial statements. First, on
April 30, 2010, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits and liabilities of
Westernbank Puerto Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
FDIC). The transaction is referred to herein as the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
Refer to Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements and to the Corporations 2010 Annual
Report for information on this business combination. Assets subject to loss sharing agreements with
the FDIC, including loans and other real estate owned, are labeled covered on the consolidated
statements of condition and applicable notes to the consolidated financial statements. Loans
acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for credit cards, and other real
estate owned are considered covered because the Corporation will be reimbursed for 80% of any
future losses on these assets subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Second, on
September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, including the
Corporations merchant acquiring and processing and technology businesses (the EVERTEC
transaction). The Corporation continues to hold the remaining 49% ownership interest in Carib
Holdings (referred to as EVERTEC). Refer to the Corporations 2010 Annual Report for a
description of the transaction. EVERTEC continues to service many of the Corporations
subsidiaries system infrastructures and transactional processing businesses. Refer to Note 4 to
these consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations investment in EVERTEC,
including related party transactions.
The Corporation reported net income of $10.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared
with a net loss of $85.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Pre-tax income for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $157.4 million, compared with a pre-tax loss of $94.3
million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Main events for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
On January 31, 2011, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law a new Internal
Revenue Code for Puerto Rico (the 2011 Tax Code), which resulted in a reduction in the
Corporations net deferred tax asset with a corresponding charge to income tax expense
of $103.3 million due to a reduction in the marginal corporate income tax rate. Under
the provisions of the 2011 Tax Code, the maximum marginal corporate income tax rate is
30% for years commenced after December 31, 2010. Prior to the 2011 Tax Code, the maximum
marginal corporate income tax rate in Puerto Rico was 39%, which had increased to 40.95%
due to a temporary 5% surtax approved in March 2009 for years beginning on January 1,
2009 through December 31, 2011. The 2011 Tax Code, however, eliminated the special 5%
surtax on corporations for tax year 2011. Under the 2011 Tax Code, the Corporation has
an irrevocable one-time election to defer the application of the 2011 Tax Code for five
years. This election must be made with the filing of the 2011 income tax return. |
|
|
|
Sale of the Corporations equity investment in the processing business of Consorcio
de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) with a positive impact in first quarter
earnings of $16.7 million, net of tax. Under the terms of the sale of the majority
interest in EVERTEC during the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation was required for a
period of twelve months following the sale to continue to seek to sell its equity
interest in CONTADO. The Corporations investment in CONTADO, accounted for under the
equity method, amounted to $16 million at December 31, 2010. |
86
|
|
|
Equity pick-up from the Corporations 49% ownership interest in the parent company of
EVERTEC, Carib Holdings, (referred to as EVERTEC) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
was positively impacted by the 2011 Tax Code by approximately $13.8 million. This impact
is recorded in other operating income. As a result of the 2011 Tax Code, EVERTEC
recognized a reduction in its deferred tax liability, which had been recognized at a
higher marginal corporate income tax rate. The deferred tax liability was principally
the result of the difference between assigned values and the tax basis of the assets and
liabilities recognized in the business combination. |
|
|
|
Prepayment penalties of $8.0 million were recognized in other operating expenses
associated with the repayment of $100 million in medium-term notes. |
|
|
|
Recognized impairment losses of $8.6 million related to the Corporations full
write-off of its investment in Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A.
(TRANRED), the Corporations Venezuela processing subsidiary, as the Corporation has
decided to wind down these operations. |
|
|
|
Completed the sale of $457 million (legal balance) in U.S. non-conventional
residential mortgage loans by Banco Popular North America that were reclassified to
loans held-for-sale during the fourth quarter of 2010. The sale had a positive impact of
approximately $16.4 million to the results of operations for the first quarter of 2011,
which included $2.6 million in gain on sale of loans and $13.8 million classified as a
reduction to the original write-down which was booked as part of the activity in the
allowance for loan losses because of better than anticipated pricing. This included an
out of period adjustment of $10.7 million as a portion of the sale was completed just
prior to the release of the Corporations 2010 Annual Report. After evaluating the
quantitative and qualitative aspects of the mistatement and the out of period adjustment, management has
determined that they are not material to prior year financial
statements and the current period, respectively. As part of the
evaluation, management considered the fact that the quarters net
income was impacted by a one-time adjustment of $103.3 million in
income tax expense that resulted from the impact of the 2011 Tax Code
previously discussed in this MD&A. |
The discussion that follows provides highlights of the Corporations results of operations for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to the results of operations for the same quarter in 2010. It
also provides some highlights with respect to the Corporations financial condition, credit
quality, capital and liquidity. Table A provides selected financial data and performance indicators
for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Financial highlights:
|
|
|
Net interest income for the first quarter of 2011 increased by $57.4 million, on a
taxable equivalent basis, compared with the first quarter of 2010. The net interest margin
on a taxable equivalent basis increased from 3.68% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to
4.17% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Covered loans, which in average approximated
$4.8 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 contributed with interest income of
$102.5 million for the quarter. The improvement in the net interest margin was mainly
influenced by the yield contribution of the covered loans accompanied with a reduction in
the cost of deposits. The favorable variance from the acquired covered loans was partially
offset by a decline in the average volume of non-covered loans, principally in the
commercial and construction loan portfolios, and lower loan yields because of the high
volume of non-accruing loans. Also, there was a decrease in investment securities and in
the benefit of the taxable equivalent adjustment. Refer to the Net Interest Income section
of this MD&A for a discussion of the major variances in net interest income, including
yields and costs. |
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 decreased by $164.9
million compared with the same quarter in the previous year. The Corporations provision
for loan losses totaled $75.3 million or 52% of net charge-offs for the quarter ended March
31, 2011, compared with $240.2 million or 107% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The
provision for loan losses and net-charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
includes $15.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively, related to covered loans of the
portfolio acquired from Westernbank Puerto Rico in the FDIC-assisted transaction. The lower
provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2011 reflects lower net charge-offs,
improvements in the credit quality of certain portfolios as well as the positive results of
steps taken by the Corporation to mitigate the overall credit risks, including putting
additional resources to the loss-mitigation areas and the sale of non-conventional mortgage
loans in the BPNA reportable segment. Also, a substantial amount of the Corporations
construction loan portfolio is currently classified as held-for-sale and impairments were
taken in the fourth quarter of 2010 to record them at lower of cost or fair value. Refer to
the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for information on the
allowance for loan losses, non-performing assets, troubled debt restructurings, net
charge-offs and credit quality metrics. |
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 increased by $6.5 million,
compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2010, mainly due to the gain on the sale of the
equity interest in CONTADO, higher FDIC loss share income, |
87
|
|
|
positive impact of the fair value changes in the FDIC equity appreciation instrument and
lower indemnity reserve adjustments on loans sold, partially offset by lower other service
fees and service charges on deposit accounts. The variance in other service fees was
principally because of lower processing, debit and credit card fees due to the sale of the
processing and merchant banking business in September 30, 2010. Refer to the Non-Interest
Income section of this MD&A for detailed information. |
|
|
|
Operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 decreased by $5.9 million
compared with the same quarter of the previous year mainly due to lower personnel costs and
equipment expenses, partially offset by higher professional fees, principally because of
the impact of the sale of the processing and merchant banking businesses. The reduction in
headcount related to this sale was partially offset by employees hired from the former
Westernbank operations. Refer to the Operating Expenses section of this MD&A for additional
explanations, including other variances, such as penalties on the early extinguishment of
debt and other real estate expenses among others. |
|
|
|
Income tax expense amounted to $147.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
compared with income tax benefit of $9.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The
variance in income tax was mainly due to an additional income tax expense of $103.3 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 due to the impact of the 2011 Tax Code in Puerto Rico
as previously described. Also, the unfavorable variance in income tax was due to higher
taxable income in the Puerto Rico operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
Total assets amounted to $38.7 billion at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, compared
with $33.8 billion at March 31, 2010. The increase in total assets at March 31, 2011, when
compared to the same date in the previous year, was principally from the acquired covered
loans and the FDIC loss share indemnification asset, which amounted to $4.7 billion and
$2.3 billion, respectively, at March 31, 2011, partially offset by a decline of $2.4
billion in non-covered loans held-in-portfolio because of the run-off of the loan portfolio
from exited lines of business, principally at BPNA, loan payments, charge-offs,
and the decrease in the carrying value of loans reclassified to loans
held-for-sale, which were recorded at lower of cost or fair value. Also, there have been soft
loan origination volumes due to the weak Puerto Rico local economy. |
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses on the non-covered loan portfolio decreased by $66 million
from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011. It represented 3.52% of non-covered loans
held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2011, compared with 3.83% at December 31, 2010. Non-covered
loans refer to loans not covered by the FDIC loss sharing agreements. This decrease
considers a reduction in the Corporations general allowance component of approximately $70
million and an increase in the specific allowance component of approximately $4 million.
The reduction in the general component of the allowance for loan losses for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, was primarily attributable to a lower level of net charge-offs,
principally from the Corporations commercial, construction and consumer loan portfolios. |
|
|
|
The Corporations non-performing loans held-in-portfolio (non-covered) increased by $63
million from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011, reaching $1.6 billion or 7.9% of total
non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2011. The increase in non-performing loans
held-in-portfolio was driven by the commercial and residential mortgage loan portfolios of
the BPPR reportable segment. Weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico have continued to
adversely impact the commercial and residential mortgage loans delinquency rates.
Non-performing construction loans of the BPPR reportable segment decreased as most of the portfolio is now classified as held-for-sale and was subject
to unfavorable fair value adjustments when reclassified in December 2010 and to a lower
level of problem loans remaining as held-in-portfolio. Consumer and lease financing loans
in non-performing status in the BPPR reportable segment continue to reflect signs of a
stable credit performance. Non-performing loans in the BPNA reportable segment decreased
from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 in almost all loan categories, except for the
mortgage loan portfolio which increased slightly. Most loan portfolios of the BPNA
reportable segment continue to show signs of credit stabilization. The Corporations
allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 includes $9 million related to the covered loan
portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Refer to the Credit Risk
Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for quantitative and qualitative
information on the loan portfolios. |
|
|
|
Refer to Table N in the Financial Condition section of this MD&A for the
percentage allocation of the composition of the Corporations financing to total assets.
Deposits totaled $27.2 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $26.8 billion at December
31, 2010 and $25.4 billion at March 31, 2010. The increase in deposits from March 31, 2010
was mostly associated with the deposits assumed from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. The Corporations borrowings amounted to $6.7 billion at March 31, 2011,
compared with $6.9 billion at December 31, 2010 and $5.0 billion at March 31, 2010. The
increase in borrowings from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was primarily related
to the note issued to the FDIC as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. |
88
|
|
|
Stockholders equity totaled $3.8 billion as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, compared with $2.5 billion at March 31, 2010. The increase in stockholders equity
from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was mostly influenced by the issuance of
depositary shares and their conversion to common stock during the second quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
The Corporation continues to be well-capitalized. The Corporations regulatory
capital ratios improved from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011. The Tier 1 capital and
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets stood at 15.25% and 11.58%, respectively, at
March 31, 2011, compared with 14.54% and 10.95%, respectively, at December 31, 2010. The
improvement was principally due to: (i) a reduction in the deferred tax asset because of
the impact of the Puerto Rico tax reform; (ii) balance sheet composition including the
increase in lower risk-assets such as investment securities (U.S. agency securities) and
mortgage loans; and (iii) internal capital generation. |
TABLE A
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition Highlights |
|
At March 31, |
|
|
Average for the first quarter |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
961,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,004,753 |
|
|
$ |
(43,188 |
) |
|
$ |
1,123,805 |
|
|
$ |
891,622 |
|
|
$ |
232,183 |
|
Investment and trading securities |
|
|
6,638,176 |
|
|
|
7,282,355 |
|
|
|
(644,179 |
) |
|
|
6,345,664 |
|
|
|
7,252,460 |
|
|
|
(906,796 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
25,976,017 |
|
|
|
23,184,711 |
|
|
|
2,791,306 |
|
|
|
25,945,614 |
|
|
|
23,344,864 |
|
|
|
2,600,750 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
33,575,758 |
|
|
|
31,471,819 |
|
|
|
2,103,939 |
|
|
|
33,415,083 |
|
|
|
31,488,946 |
|
|
|
1,926,137 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
38,736,267 |
|
|
|
33,832,437 |
|
|
|
4,903,830 |
|
|
|
38,678,220 |
|
|
|
33,916,221 |
|
|
|
4,761,999 |
|
Deposits* |
|
|
27,196,674 |
|
|
|
25,360,312 |
|
|
|
1,836,362 |
|
|
|
27,279,489 |
|
|
|
25,541,357 |
|
|
|
1,738,132 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
6,727,757 |
|
|
|
5,043,861 |
|
|
|
1,683,896 |
|
|
|
6,746,215 |
|
|
|
5,075,830 |
|
|
|
1,670,385 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
3,804,906 |
|
|
|
2,487,201 |
|
|
|
1,317,705 |
|
|
|
3,597,212 |
|
|
|
2,419,165 |
|
|
|
1,178,047 |
|
|
* Average deposits exclude average derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Highlights |
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
343,359 |
|
|
$ |
268,917 |
|
|
$ |
74,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
(164,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
164,368 |
|
|
|
157,866 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
275,049 |
|
|
|
280,913 |
|
|
|
(5,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
157,359 |
|
|
|
(94,330 |
) |
|
|
251,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
147,227 |
|
|
|
(9,275 |
) |
|
|
156,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
10,132 |
|
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
|
$ |
95,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
|
$ |
(85,055 |
) |
|
$ |
94,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic
and diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Statistical Information |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
3.53 |
|
|
$ |
2.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share at period end |
|
|
3.67 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
(1.02 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
(14.56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
15.25 |
|
|
|
9.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
16.52 |
|
|
|
10.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio |
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a financial services company, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by
general business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation
are influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and
savings, capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and
prevailing market rates on competing products. The Corporation continuously monitors general
business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest
rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems
efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.
The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes
in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions
could adversely affect its profitability.
89
The description of the Corporations business contained in Item 1 of the Corporations 2010 Annual
Report, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information about the business of the
Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporations control that, in addition to the other
information in this Form 10-Q, readers should consider.
The Corporations common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol BPOP.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized
in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent
to March 31, 2011. Such evaluation resulted in no adjustments or additional disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) -
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. Effective this quarter, it also requires the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances
and settlements within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also
clarify that disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that
disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and
non-recurring fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 has been effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2010. This guidance impacts disclosures only and has not had an effect on the Corporations
consolidated statements of condition or results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about
fair value measurements are presented in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-28, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to
Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying
Amounts (ASU 2010-28)
The amendments in ASU 2010-28, issued in December 2010, modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an
entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill
impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors
indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing
guidance and examples, which require that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. For public entities, the
amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance
did not have an impact on the Corporations consolidated statement of condition or results of
operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-29, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of
Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29)
The FASB issued ASU 2010-29 in December 2010. The amendments in ASU 2010-29 affect any public
entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate
basis. This ASU specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the
entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro
forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro
forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro
forma revenue and earnings. The amendments are effective prospectively for business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and did not have an impact on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditors Determination of
Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (ASU 2011-02)
The FASB issued ASU 2011-02 in April 2011. This ASU clarifies which loan modifications constitute
troubled debt restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in determining whether a
modification of the terms of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt
restructuring, both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure of troubled
debt restructurings.
90
The new guidance will require creditors to evaluate modifications and restructurings of receivables
using a more principles-based approach. This Update clarifies the existing guidance on whether (1)
the creditor has granted a concession and (2) whether the debtor is experiencing financial
difficulties. Specifically this Update (1) provides additional guidance on determining whether a
creditor has granted a concession, including guidance on collection of all amounts due, receipt of
additional collateral or guarantees from the debtor, and restructuring the debt at a below-market
rate; (2) includes examples for creditors to determine whether an insignificant delay in payment is
considered a concession; (3) prohibits creditors from using the borrowers effective rate test in
ASC Subtopic 470-50 to evaluate whether a concession has been granted to the borrower; (4) adds
factors for creditors to use to determine whether the debtor is experiencing financial
difficulties; and (5) ends the deferral of the additional disclosures about TDR activities required
by ASU 2010-20 and requires public companies to begin providing these disclosures in the period of
adoption.
For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or
after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the
beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early application is permitted. For purposes of measuring
impairment for receivables that are newly considered impaired under the new guidance, an entity
should apply the amendments prospectively in the first period of adoption and disclose the total
amount of receivables and the allowance for credit losses as of the end of the period of adoption.
The Corporation is evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of
Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements (ASU 2011-03)
The FASB issued ASU 2011-03 in April 2011. The amendment of this ASU affects all entities that
enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to
repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The ASU modifies the criteria for
determining when these transactions would be accounted for as financings (secured
borrowings/lending agreements) as opposed to sales (purchases) with commitments to repurchase
(resell). This ASU does not affect other transfers of financial assets. ASC Topic 860 prescribes
when an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon the transfer of financial assets subject to
repo agreements. That determination is based, in part, on whether the entity has maintained
effective control over transferred financial assets.
Specifically, the amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the
criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets
on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2)
eliminates the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund
substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets.
The new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December
15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing
transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early application is not permitted.
The Corporation will be evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance
will have on its consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices
within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporations accounting policies,
by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other
subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time
and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those
estimates.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Corporations Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical
accounting policies those related to: (i) Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments; (ii)
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses; (iii) Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related
Indemnification Asset; (iv) Income Taxes; (v) Goodwill, and (vi) Pension and Postretirement Benefit
Obligations. For a summary of these critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to that
particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.s 2010 Financial Review and Supplementary
Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Annual Report). Also, refer to Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements included in the 2010 Annual Report for a summary of the
Corporations significant accounting policies.
91
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 resulted in
an increase of $57.4 million when compared with the same period in 2010.
Tax-exempt interest earning assets include the investment securities and loans that are exempt from
income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain
investments in obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, and certain obligations of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies and instrumentalities. Assets held by the
Corporations international banking entities, which previously were tax exempt under Puerto Rico
law, are subject to a temporary 5% income tax rate. To facilitate the comparison of all interest
related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis,
using the applicable statutory income tax rates at each quarter, in the subsidiaries that have the
benefit. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by
the Puerto Rico tax law. Under this law, the exempt interest can be deducted up to the amount of
taxable income. BPPRs tax position changed during the third quarter of 2010 and the benefit
previously obtained from exempt investments is, for now, not applicable; therefore, no adjustments
were made to BPPRs net interest income in the first quarter of 2011 since its current tax is the
marginal tax rate. The latter explains the decrease of $17.0 million in the taxable equivalent
adjustment when compared to the same quarter of 2010.
Refer to Table B for a detailed analysis of levels and yields on a taxable equivalent basis
segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized
gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the
respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the
origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to
interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums /
discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for the
period ended March 31, 2011 included a favorable impact related to those items of $5.0 million,
excluding the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC
Subtopic 310-30, compared to a favorable impact of $3.9 million for the same period in 2010. The
discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 and 310-20, as
described below, was $72.9 million and $24.4 million, respectively for the quarter ended March 31,
2011.
The increase in net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, compared with the same period in 2010, was driven mostly by:
|
|
|
the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 amounted
to $72.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Also, there was $24.4 million
discount accretion on covered loans acquired from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction
that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving characteristics.
This impact is included in the line item Covered loans in
Table B; and |
|
|
|
a decrease in deposit costs of 39 basis points associated with both a low interest rate
scenario and management actions to reduce deposits costs, principally in certificates of
deposit and money market accounts, as well as lower costs on brokered certificates of
deposit. Management is actively monitoring the impact the rate reductions could have on the
Corporations liquidity. |
The above variances were partially offset by the following factors which affected negatively the
Corporations net interest margin:
|
|
|
the FDIC loss share indemnification asset of $2.3 billion at March 31, 2011, which is a
non-interest earning asset that is being funded mainly through the FDIC note at a 2.50%
annual fixed interest rate. The accretion or amortization of the FDIC loss share
indemnification asset is recorded in non-interest income; |
|
|
|
a decrease in the yield of commercial, construction and mortgage loans, principally
because of the high volume of loans in non-accrual status; and |
|
|
|
a lower yield on investment securities, principally because of the lower taxable
equivalent adjustment in the first quarter of 2011. |
92
TABLE B
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis
Quarters ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
Average Volume |
|
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
$ |
1,124 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
(0.13 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
5,663 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
(1,137 |
) |
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
(0.77 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
52,457 |
|
|
|
76,174 |
|
|
|
(23,717 |
) |
|
|
(11,557 |
) |
|
|
(12,160 |
) |
|
682 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
6.91 |
|
|
|
(1.24 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market, investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,469 |
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
and trading securities |
|
|
62,944 |
|
|
|
84,933 |
|
|
|
(21,989 |
) |
|
|
(13,212 |
) |
|
|
(8,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,118 |
|
|
|
14,150 |
|
|
|
(2,032 |
) |
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
Commercial and construction |
|
|
142,490 |
|
|
|
173,042 |
|
|
|
(30,552 |
) |
|
|
(11,569 |
) |
|
|
(18,983 |
) |
|
592 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
9.01 |
|
|
|
8.71 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
13,318 |
|
|
|
14,319 |
|
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
72,316 |
|
|
|
72,415 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(3,268 |
) |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
3,987 |
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
93,706 |
|
|
|
101,399 |
|
|
|
(7,693 |
) |
|
|
(944 |
) |
|
|
(6,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,131 |
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
(2,214 |
) |
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
Sub-total loans |
|
|
321,830 |
|
|
|
361,175 |
|
|
|
(39,345 |
) |
|
|
(15,298 |
) |
|
|
(24,047 |
) |
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
8.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.61 |
|
|
Covered loans |
|
|
102,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,946 |
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
2,601 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
424,378 |
|
|
|
361,175 |
|
|
|
63,203 |
|
|
|
(15,298 |
) |
|
|
78,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,415 |
|
|
$ |
31,489 |
|
|
$ |
1,926 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
% |
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
487,322 |
|
|
$ |
446,108 |
|
|
$ |
41,214 |
|
|
$ |
(28,510 |
) |
|
$ |
69,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
4,811 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.86 |
% |
|
|
(0.13 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market* |
|
$ |
8,915 |
|
|
$ |
10,243 |
|
|
$ |
(1,328 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
210 |
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
12,557 |
|
|
|
12,126 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
(1,173 |
) |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
11,135 |
|
|
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
(0.63 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
55,407 |
|
|
|
70,605 |
|
|
|
(15,198 |
) |
|
|
(16,722 |
) |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,354 |
|
|
|
21,161 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
76,879 |
|
|
|
92,974 |
|
|
|
(16,095 |
) |
|
|
(19,433 |
) |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,743 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
14,015 |
|
|
|
15,259 |
|
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
904 |
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
(2.65 |
) |
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
51,198 |
|
|
|
50,045 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
7,766 |
|
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,100 |
|
|
|
26,237 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
(0.47 |
) |
|
liabilities |
|
|
142,092 |
|
|
|
158,278 |
|
|
|
(16,186 |
) |
|
|
(13,815 |
) |
|
|
(2,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,926 |
|
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,415 |
|
|
$ |
31,489 |
|
|
$ |
1,926 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
(0.32 |
%) |
|
Total source of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
345,230 |
|
|
|
287,830 |
|
|
|
57,400 |
|
|
$ |
(14,695 |
) |
|
$ |
72,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
(17,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
343,359 |
|
|
$ |
268,917 |
|
|
$ |
74,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based
on the proportion of the change in each category.
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
Excluding the loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction, most loan categories decreased
in volume, especially the commercial and construction loan portfolios due to low origination
activity and loan charge-offs. The consumer loan portfolio showed a decrease due to the slowdown in
the auto and consumer loan origination activity in Puerto Rico, and the run-off of E-LOANs home
equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and closed-end second mortgages. The covered loans acquired in
the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, that contributed $4.8 billion in average loan volume for
the first quarter of 2011, net of fair value adjustments,
93
mitigated the decrease in the volume of
earning assets. The covered loans contributed $102.5 million to the Corporations interest income
during the first quarter of 2011. Investment securities decreased in average volume as a result of
maturities and
prepayments of mortgage-related investment securities, which funds were not reinvested due in part
to deleveraging strategies, and to the sale of certain investment securities during the third
quarter of 2010.
Also affecting net interest income was the increase in the volume of medium and long-term debt,
particularly the note payable issued to the FDIC in April 2010, partially offset by the decrease,
mostly associated to the early cancellation of debt, of both FHLB advances and medium-term notes.
Average non-interest bearing demand deposits increased by $546 million, resulting in an increase of interest free
funding and positively impacting net interest margin.
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses totaled $75.3 million, or 52%, of net charge-offs for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, compared with $240.2 million or 107% of net charge-offs, for the first
quarter of 2010. The provision for loan losses and net-charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, includes $15.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively, related to covered loans of the
portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. When the Corporation records a
provision for loan losses on the covered loans, it also records a benefit of 80% attributable to
the FDIC loss sharing agreements, which is recorded in non-interest income.
The lower provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2011, compared with the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, reflects lower net charge-offs, improvements in the credit quality of certain
portfolios as well as the positive results of steps taken by the Corporation to mitigate the
overall credit risks. Since March 31, 2010, loans held-in-portfolio, excluding the covered loans
of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, decreased by approximately $2.4 billion, mainly as a
result of the transfer, during the fourth quarter of 2010, of $1.0 billion of loans, primarily
non-accruing loans, from the held-in-portfolio to held-for-sale category, at lower of cost or fair
value. During the first quarter of 2011, the BPNA reportable segment completed the sale of $457
million (legal balance) in U.S. non-conventional residential mortgage loans that had been
reclassified to loans held-for-sale during the fourth quarter of 2010. The sale had a positive
impact to the provision for loan losses of $13.8 million since the benefit of improved pricing was
classified as a reduction to the original write-down which was booked as part of the activity in
the allowance for loan losses. This included an out of period adjustment of $10.7 million as a
portion of the sale was completed just prior to the release of the Corporations 2010 Annual
Report.
Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for a detailed analysis
of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses
statistics.
94
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Refer to Table C for a breakdown on non-interest income by major categories for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
TABLE C
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
45,630 |
|
|
$ |
50,578 |
|
|
$ |
(4,948 |
) |
|
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debit card fees |
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
26,593 |
|
|
|
(13,668 |
) |
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,926 |
|
|
|
10,990 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
10,576 |
|
|
|
23,297 |
|
|
|
(12,721 |
) |
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
7,130 |
|
|
|
7,167 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments |
|
|
6,260 |
|
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
(5,099 |
) |
Trust fees |
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
2,983 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
(12,265 |
) |
Other fees |
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
Total other service fees |
|
$ |
58,652 |
|
|
$ |
101,320 |
|
|
$ |
(42,668 |
) |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
Trading account loss |
|
$ |
(499 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
Gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustment on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
7,244 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
Adjustment (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold |
|
|
(9,848 |
) |
|
|
(17,290 |
) |
|
|
7,442 |
|
FDIC loss share income |
|
|
16,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,035 |
|
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
7,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,745 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
39,409 |
|
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
|
21,077 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
164,368 |
|
|
$ |
157,866 |
|
|
$ |
6,502 |
|
|
Non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared with the same quarter in the
previous year was mainly impacted by the following positive variances:
|
|
|
$16.0 million favorable variance in FDIC loss share income for the quarter ended March
31, 2011. The increase resulted from the positive impact of $12.4 million corresponding to
the increase in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset due to the recording of $15.6
million in provision for loan losses on loans covered under the loss sharing agreements due
to an increase in expected losses on particular loan pools accounted for under ASC Subtopic
310-30 and inherent losses on certain loan pools accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-20.
Also, the increase in FDIC loss share income was the result of accretion of the
indemnification asset of $24.3 million, partially offset by $21.5 million in losses
resulting from the Corporations reciprocal accounting on the accretion of the discount for
covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-20 and the amortization of the
fair value related to unfunded commitments recorded when the business combination was
effected; |
|
|
|
$7.7 million favorable impact in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument
issued to the FDIC resulting from a shorter period remaining for the expiration of the
instrument, which expires on May 7, 2011, and the lower probability of exercise; |
|
|
|
$21.1 million favorable variance in other operating income due to the gain of $20.6
million (before tax) on the sale of the equity interest in CONTADO and a gain of $3.3 million resulting
from lower credit adjustments on interest rate swaps. These variances in other operating
income were offset by losses of $1.9 million from the retained ownership interest in
EVERTEC, which represented $11.8 million of the share of EVERTECs net income which mostly
resulted from the $13.8 million positive impact related to the reversal of EVERTECs
deferred tax liability upon application of the Puerto Rico income tax reform, offset by the
49% of intercompany eliminations of $13.7 million. This elimination mostly represents the
costs that the Corporation records in the professional fees category within operating
expenses and that EVERTEC has recognized as part of its net income and must be eliminated
as it represents a transaction with an affiliate; and |
|
|
|
$7.4 million favorable variance resulting from lower adjustments recorded to indemnity
reserves on loans sold by $5.9 million in the BPPR reportable segment and $1.5 million in
the BPNA reportable segment and the discontinued operations of Popular Financial Holdings
(PFH), the latter which is part of the Corporate group. |
95
These
favorable variances in non-interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared to
the same quarter of the previous year, were partially offset by the following unfavorable
variances:
|
|
|
lower other service fees by $42.7 million, mostly due to lower credit and debit card fees
of $26.4 million as a result of transferring the merchant business to EVERTEC as part of
the sale and lower volume of credit cards subject to late payment fees and lower average
rate charged per transaction, and lower processing fees of $12.3 million which were previously
generated by the Corporations processing business which was also transferred as part of the
EVERTEC sale. There was also a decrease in the category of mortgage servicing fees, net of
fair value adjustments, by $5.1 million due to unfavorable fair value adjustments on
mortgage servicing rights,
partially offset by higher servicing fees; and |
|
|
|
lower service charges on deposit accounts by $4.9 million mostly in the BPNA reportable
segment related to lower nonsufficient funds fees and reduced fees from money services
clients, the impact of Regulation E, and fewer customer accounts resulting from the
reduction in BPNAs branches. |
OPERATING EXPENSES
Table D provides a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories.
TABLE D
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
84,611 |
|
|
$ |
95,873 |
|
|
$ |
(11,262 |
) |
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
21,529 |
|
|
|
25,059 |
|
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
106,140 |
|
|
|
120,932 |
|
|
|
(14,792 |
) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
24,586 |
|
|
|
28,876 |
|
|
|
(4,290 |
) |
Equipment expenses |
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
23,453 |
|
|
|
(11,417 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
11,972 |
|
|
|
12,304 |
|
|
|
(332 |
) |
Professional fees |
|
|
46,688 |
|
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
19,639 |
|
Communications |
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
(3,562 |
) |
Business promotion |
|
|
9,860 |
|
|
|
8,295 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
17,673 |
|
|
|
15,318 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
8,239 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
7,691 |
|
Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
4,703 |
|
|
|
(2,492 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
24,245 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
275,049 |
|
|
$ |
280,913 |
|
|
$ |
(5,864 |
) |
|
Full time equivalent employees totaled 8,260 at March 31, 2011 compared with 9,366 at March 31,
2010. The decrease in personnel costs was principally related to the reduction in headcount because
of the sale of EVERTEC. Personnel costs corresponding to the EVERTEC and merchant banking business
in the first quarter of 2010 amounted to approximately $21.2 million. The reductions resulting from
the exclusion of EVERTEC were partially offset by the salaries from the employees hired from the
former Westernbank operations. For the first quarter of 2011, the BPPR reportable segment showed an
increase in salaries of $5.1 million, compared with the same quarter of the previous year. Also,
influencing the variance in personnel costs was lower pension cost by
$2.6 million mainly from the
impact of the return on plan assets, partially offset by higher postretirement benefit costs by
$1.2 million.
The decrease in equipment expenses was mainly due to lower depreciation expense of software
licenses and electronic equipment as a result of the transfer of software and equipment to EVERTEC
as part of the sale.
The decrease in net occupancy expenses was primarily from a reduction of $3.3 million because of
the EVERTEC sale, including the merchant business, and of $2.1 million in the BPNA reportable
segment due to fewer branches as a result of the restructuring of its operations
Professional fees increased principally in the categories of system application processing and
hosting, credit collection and computer service fees. Processing and hosting represent services
provided by EVERTEC to the Corporations subsidiaries. Prior to
96
the sale of EVERTEC, these costs
were fully eliminated in consolidation, but now 51% of such costs are not eliminated when
consolidating the Corporations financial results of operations,
thus results in an increase for the first quarter of 2011.
The loss on early extinguishment of debt for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was mainly related to
$8.0 million in prepayment penalties on the repayment of $100 million in medium-term notes.
The category of other operating expenses in Table D remained stable. Main variances in this
category when comparing results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 with the same quarter in 2010
included an impairment loss of $8.6 million related to the previously mentioned write-down of the
Corporations Venezuela operations and an unfavorable variance of $3.5 million in the provision for
unfunded credit commitments. These main variances were offset by lower credit card processing,
volume and interchange expenses by $7.6 million because of the sale of the processing and merchant
banking businesses, lower sundry losses by $1.3 million lower foreign currency expense by $2.2
million due to the remeasurement of the financial statements of TRANRED (formerly
EVERTEC-Venezuela) in the first quarter of 2010 and transportation and travel by $0.1 million,
among others.
INCOME TAXES
As shown
in Table E, income tax expense amounted to $147.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
a significant increase compared to
the same quarter of 2010. The increase in income tax
expense was due to higher income before tax on the Puerto Rico operations and lower exempt interest
income net of disallowance of expenses attributed to such exempt income. Also, in January 2011, the
Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law a new Internal Revenue Code for Puerto Rico which, among
other things, reduced the marginal corporate income tax rate from 39%
to 30% effective January 1, 2011. Consequently, as a
result of this reduction in rate in Puerto Rico, the Corporation recognized during the first
quarter of 2011 an income tax expense of $103.3 million and a corresponding reduction in the net
deferred tax asset.
The reasons for the difference between the income tax expense (benefit) applicable to income before
income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico are included
in the table that follows.
TABLE E
Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% of pre-tax
income |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% of pre-tax
income |
|
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
47,207 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
$ |
(38,628 |
) |
|
|
41 |
% |
Net reversal (benefit) of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
(2,407 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12,231 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
33,280 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions |
|
|
(2,464 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate |
|
|
103,287 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes and others |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,641 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Income tax
expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
147,227 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
$ |
(9,275 |
) |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
Refer to Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporations
deferred tax assets at March 31, 2011.
REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS
The Corporations reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. A Corporate group has been defined to support the
reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the corporate group
are not allocated to the reportable segments.
As a result of the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, the Corporation no longer presents EVERTEC as
a reportable segment and therefore, historical financial information for EVERTEC, including the
merchant acquiring business that was part of the BPPR reportable segment but transferred to EVERTEC
in connection with the sale, has been reclassified under Corporate for all periods discussed. The
financial results for Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, a former subsidiary of EVERTEC, and
the equity
97
investments in Serfinsa, formerly included as part of the EVERTEC reportable segment,
are included as part of the Corporate group. Revenues from the Corporations equity interest in
EVERTEC are being reported as non-interest income in the Corporate group.
For a description of the Corporations reportable segments, including additional financial
information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 30 to the consolidated
financial statements.
The Corporate group had a net loss of $16.3 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared with a
net loss of $5.6 million in the same quarter of the previous year.
Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segments net income amounted to $3.6 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared with $24.3 million for the same quarter in 2010.
The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011, when compared with the first quarter of 2010, included the following:
|
|
|
higher net interest income by $76.1 million, or 35%, mainly as a result of the
covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction which contributed with
interest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of $102.5 million. Also, the
improvement in net interest income was also associated with a lower cost of deposits,
primarily in certificates of deposit and money market accounts as a result of management
actions to reduce deposit costs and to lower costs of brokered certificates of deposit,
partially offset by the impact of the greater average volume of interest-bearing deposits
that were assumed in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Negatively impacting net
interest income is the FDIC loss share indemnification asset of $2.3 billion at March 31,
2011, which is a non-interest earning asset, but is being funded mainly through the FDIC
note at a 2.50% annual fixed interest rate. The accretion or amortization of the FDIC loss
share indemnification asset is recorded in non-interest income. Also, excluding the loans
acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction, most loan categories decreased in volume,
especially commercial and construction loan portfolios, due to low origination activity and
loan charge-offs, and there was a greater volume of non-performing loans. Furthermore,
there was lower interest income from investment securities because of lower volume of
securities as a result of the Corporations deleveraging strategy in 2010. The BPPR
reportable segment had a net interest margin of 4.78% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
compared with 4.10% for the same period in 2010; |
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $41.1 million, or 38%, in part due to lower level of
net charge-offs, principally in construction and consumer loans. The decrease in net-charge
offs of the BPPR construction loan portfolio was principally driven by a high volume of
construction loans that are being accounted for as loans
held-for-sale following reclassification in 2010, while the decrease in
net charge-offs of the BPPR consumer loan portfolio was prompted by a more stable credit
performance in terms of delinquencies and losses. These positive variances were partially
offset by a higher provision for loan losses of the mortgage loan portfolio in the BPPR
reportable segment driven principally by higher loan portfolio balance and delinquencies.
The BPPR mortgage loan portfolio continues to be negatively impacted by the current
economic conditions in Puerto Rico. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the
Corporation recognized a provision for loan losses of $15.6 million and net charge-offs of
$6.4 million related to the covered loan portfolio from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section for detailed
information by loan portfolio and credit quality metrics; |
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $33.1 million, or 37%, primarily as a result of the FDIC
loss share income of $16.0 million described in the Non-Interest Income section of this
MD&A, the $7.7 million positive impact due to the fair value change of the equity
appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC as part of the assisted transaction, and lower
adjustments to increase the indemnity reserves on loans sold by $5.9 million. Other service
fees in the BPPR reportable segment remained stable, but represented the net impact of
unfavorable variances primarily in fair value adjustments to mortgage servicing rights,
offset, for example, by higher insurance fees, trust fees and credit card interchange
income due to an increase in retail sales volume; |
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $23.9 million, or 14%, mainly due to higher professional
fees, personnel costs, business promotion and other operating expenses. The increase in
professional fees by $8.9 million was mainly due to higher collection costs and technology
consulting fees, among others. The increase in personnel costs by $4.8 million was mainly
due to the new hires from Westernbank. The increase in business promotion by $1.3 million
was mainly because of the new advertising campaign in the mortgage operations. The
increase in other operating expenses was mostly due to an increase from the amortization of
the FDIC prepaid deposit insurance, higher other real estate owned expenses and an
unfavorable variance in the provision for unfunded credit commitments; and |
98
|
|
|
income tax expense of $146.1 million in 2011, compared with an income tax benefit of
$0.9 million in 2010, primarily due to an additional income tax expense of $103.3 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 resulting from a reduction in the marginal corporate
income tax rate due to the Puerto Rico tax reform and to higher income before tax and lower
exempt interest income net of disallowance of expenses attributed to such exempt income. |
Banco Popular North America
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the reportable segment of Banco Popular North America
reported net income of $22.3 million, compared with a net loss of $104.2 million for the same
quarter of the previous year. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the
financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, when compared with the first quarter of
2010, included the following:
|
|
|
lower net interest income by $4.0 million, or 5%, mainly due to a reduction in the
volume of average earning assets, principally as a result of the run-off of the legacy
portfolio, charge-offs, loan sales and to a lesser extent transfers to other real estate
owned, partially offset by the positive impact of a reduction in the average volume of
brokered certificates of deposit and long-term debt, in part because of the early
extinguishment of FHLB advances during 2010. Impacting positively the net interest income
was a lower cost of interest bearing deposits, mainly time deposits and money market
deposits; |
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $123.8 million, or 94%, principally as a result of
reductions in all loan portfolios and lower net charge-offs by $68.2 million, consisting of
reductions in all loan categories. Also, there was the $13.8 million reduction in the
provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 related to the benefit of
improved pricing on the sale of the non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio which was
previously discussed in the Overview section of this MD&A; |
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $0.9 million, principally due to $2.8 million in higher
gains on the sale of loans and $0.8 million in lower charges to increase the indemnity
reserves for representations and warranties on loans sold, partially offset by lower service
charges on deposit accounts by $4.3 million due to lower non-sufficient funds fees and
reduced fees from money services clients, the impact of Regulation E, and because of fewer
customer accounts resulting from the reduction in BPNAs branches; and |
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $6.1 million, or 9%, principally as a result of lower net
occupancy expenses by $2.1 million mainly due to fewer branch locations and lower
professional fees by $1.8 million mostly due to lower computer service fees (item
processing costs) and armored car service fees. Also, there were lower other operating
expenses by $2.5 million mainly due to lower other real estate owned expenses, lower
provision for unfunded commitments and sundry losses, partially offset by higher
amortization of FDIC assessments. |
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets
The Corporations total assets were $38.7 billion at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, compared
with $33.8 billion at March 31, 2010. Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in
this report for the Corporations consolidated statements of condition as of such dates. As
previously discussed, the increase in total assets from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was
principally due to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Covered loans at March 31, 2011
amounted to $4.7 billion.
99
Investment securities
Table F provides a breakdown of the Corporations portfolio of investment securities
available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) on a combined basis. Also, Notes 7 and 8 to
the consolidated financial statements provides additional information with respect to the
Corporations investment securities AFS and HTM.
TABLE F
Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
62.4 |
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
113.0 |
|
|
$ |
(50.6 |
) |
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,461.1 |
|
|
|
1,211.3 |
|
|
|
249.8 |
|
|
|
1,705.3 |
|
|
|
(244.2 |
) |
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
143.3 |
|
|
|
144.7 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
259.5 |
|
|
|
(116.2 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
1,684.7 |
|
|
|
1,323.4 |
|
|
|
361.3 |
|
|
|
1,587.1 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,413.4 |
|
|
|
2,576.1 |
|
|
|
(162.7 |
) |
|
|
3,068.5 |
|
|
|
(655.1 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Others |
|
|
54.1 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
|
Total investment securities AFS and HTM |
|
$ |
5,828.4 |
|
|
$ |
5,359.2 |
|
|
$ |
469.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,745.3 |
|
|
$ |
(916.9 |
) |
|
The
increase in investment securities from December 31, 2010 was primarily related to the purchase of U.S. Government
agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations and U.S. agency securities to deploy excess
liquidity at the BPNA reportable segment and increase the yield on earning assets by investing in
longer-term assets, partially offset by maturities and prepayments.
Loans
Refer to Table G, for a breakdown of the Corporations loan portfolio, the principal category of
earning assets. Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented in a separate
line item in Table G. Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the covered
loans are significantly different, thus the Corporation has determined to segregate them in the
information included in Table G.
The
changes in loan balances generally reflect weak loan demand, the high level of loan charge-offs as a result of the
downturn in the real estate market and continued weakened economy, and the exiting or downsizing of
certain loan origination channels due to strategic decisions.
TABLE G
Loans Ending Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. March 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
11,124,330 |
|
|
$ |
11,393,485 |
|
|
$ |
(269,155) |
|
|
$ |
12,250,591 |
|
|
$ |
(1,126,261 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
439,399 |
|
|
|
500,851 |
|
|
|
(61,452) |
|
|
|
1,618,828 |
|
|
|
(1,179,429 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
592,092 |
|
|
|
602,993 |
|
|
|
(10,901) |
|
|
|
653,734 |
|
|
|
(61,642 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
4,895,682 |
|
|
|
4,524,722 |
|
|
|
370,960 |
|
|
|
4,649,223 |
|
|
|
246,459 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,625,286 |
|
|
|
3,705,984 |
|
|
|
(80,698) |
|
|
|
3,905,923 |
|
|
|
(280,637 |
) |
|
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
20,676,789 |
|
|
|
20,728,035 |
|
|
|
(51,246) |
|
|
|
23,078,299 |
|
|
|
(2,401,510 |
) |
Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements [1] |
|
|
4,729,550 |
|
|
|
4,836,882 |
|
|
|
(107,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,729,550 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
25,406,339 |
|
|
|
25,564,917 |
|
|
|
(158,578) |
|
|
|
23,078,299 |
|
|
|
2,328,040 |
|
|
Loans held-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
61,276 |
|
|
|
60,528 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
14,208 |
|
|
|
47,068 |
|
Construction |
|
|
392,113 |
|
|
|
412,744 |
|
|
|
(20,631) |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
390,172 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
116,289 |
|
|
|
420,666 |
|
|
|
(304,377) |
|
|
|
90,263 |
|
|
|
26,026 |
|
|
Total loans held-for-sale |
|
|
569,678 |
|
|
|
893,938 |
|
|
|
(324,260) |
|
|
|
106,412 |
|
|
|
463,266 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
25,976,017 |
|
|
$ |
26,458,855 |
|
|
$ |
(482,838) |
|
|
$ |
23,184,711 |
|
|
$ |
2,791,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of the loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements. |
100
The explanations for loan portfolio variances discussed below exclude the impact of the
acquired covered loans.
Excluding the acquired covered loans, all loan portfolios at March 31, 2011, except for mortgage
loans, declined compared with December 31, 2010. The decrease in commercial loans held-in-portfolio
was principally in the BPNA reportable segment by $215 million in part because of commercial net
charge-offs of $33.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and legacy portfolio run-off
associated with exited origination channels in the U.S. operations. Commercial loans
held-in-portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment declined by
approximately $54 million when
compared with year-end 2010, principally due to net charge-offs of $40.2 million in the quarter
ended March 31, 2011. Portfolio run-off in the BPPR reportable segment was in part offset by new
origination activity. The decrease in construction loans was principally in the BPNA reportable
segment by $42 million and the BPPR reportable segment by $19 million. The decrease in consumer
loans from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 was primarily related to a decline in credit cards
and personal loans. The increase in mortgage loans held-in-portfolio was principally related to the
acquisition of approximately $236 million in unpaid principal balance of performing residential
mortgage loans in March 2011, loans repurchased under credit recourse arrangements and the loan
origination activity by the BPPR reportable segment. The decline in mortgage loans held-for-sale
was principally due to the sale of the non-conventional mortgage loans in the BPNA reportable
segment.
The decrease in commercial loans held-in-portfolio from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was
also associated with the downsizing of the legacy portfolio of the business lines exited by BPNA, a
high volume of charge-offs and slow loan origination activity due to the economic environment. The
decline in construction loans held-in-portfolio from March 31, 2010 was also related to
charge-offs, repossessed properties and controlled activity for new advances under existing
construction projects. The decrease in construction and commercial loans held-in-portfolio was also
related to the reclassification of construction and commercial loans to the held-for-sale category
in December 2010. The expected sale of the BPPR construction and commercial loan portfolio, which
was classified as held-for-sale in December 2010, is expected to occur in the second quarter of
2011 as the Corporation continues the negotiations with the potential buyer.
The decline in the consumer loan portfolio was mainly related to run-off of existing portfolios,
principally exited lines of businesses at the BPNA operations, including E-LOAN, the impact of
consumer loan net charge-offs and a decline in the BPPR reportable segment credit card portfolio.
The decline in the lease financing portfolio from March 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 at the BPPR
reportable segment was $38 million, which as well as the other loan portfolios continues to reflect
the general slowdown in originations. BPNA, which lease financing portfolio decreased by $24
million, are no longer originating lease financing and as such, the outstanding portfolio in those
operations is running off.
The increase in mortgage loans was mainly in the BPPR reportable segment principally as a result of
the loan portfolio acquired in the first quarter of 2011 and new originations, partially offset by
the impact of loans securitized into agency mortgage-backed securities and the sale of
non-conventional mortgage loans.
The covered loans were initially recorded at fair value. Their carrying value approximated $4.7
billion at March 31, 2011, of which approximately 70% pertained to commercial and construction
loans, 26% to mortgage loans and 4% to consumer loans. Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements presents the carrying amount of the covered loans broken down by major loan type
categories. A substantial amount of the covered loans, or approximately $4.4 billion of their
carrying value at March 31, 2011, is accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30.
FDIC loss share indemnification asset
As part of the loan portfolio fair value estimation in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction,
the Corporation established the FDIC loss share indemnification asset, which represented the
present value of the estimated losses on loans to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The FDIC loss share
indemnification asset amounted to $2.3 billion as of March 31, 2011 and is presented in a separate
line item in the consolidated statement of condition.
101
The following table sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset for the
first quarter of 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
2,311,997 |
|
Increase due to a decrease in cash flow estimates |
|
|
12,445 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
24,308 |
|
Decrease due to reciprocal accounting on the discount accretion for loans and unfunded
commitments accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 |
|
|
(21,465 |
) |
Claims |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
2,325,618 |
|
|
Other assets
Table H provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of Other
assets in the consolidated statements of condition at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March
31, 2010.
TABLE H
Breakdown of Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 Vs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 Vs |
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
$ |
294,559 |
|
|
$ |
299,185 |
|
|
$ |
(4,626 |
) |
|
$ |
106,147 |
|
|
$ |
188,412 |
|
Net deferred tax assets
(net of valuation allowance) |
|
|
250,568 |
|
|
|
388,466 |
|
|
|
(137,898 |
) |
|
|
366,224 |
|
|
|
(115,656 |
) |
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
239,103 |
|
|
|
237,997 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
234,008 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
129,093 |
|
|
|
147,513 |
|
|
|
(18,420 |
) |
|
|
193,166 |
|
|
|
(64,073 |
) |
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
66,719 |
|
|
|
75,149 |
|
|
|
(8,430 |
) |
|
|
125,387 |
|
|
|
(58,668 |
) |
Derivative assets |
|
|
65,169 |
|
|
|
72,510 |
|
|
|
(7,341 |
) |
|
|
72,356 |
|
|
|
(7,187 |
) |
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
37,752 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
37,405 |
|
|
|
57,536 |
|
|
|
(19,784 |
) |
Others |
|
|
238,937 |
|
|
|
234,906 |
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
225,604 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,321,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,456,073 |
|
|
$ |
(134,173 |
) |
|
$ |
1,380,428 |
|
|
$ |
(58,528 |
) |
|
The reduction in the net deferred tax asset from December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010 to March
31, 2011 was principally due to the previously mentioned impact of the Puerto Rico tax reform. The
decrease in other prepaid expenses from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was primarily
influenced by a reduction in software packages and related maintenance in part due to the transfer
to EVERTEC. The increase in investments under the equity method from March 31, 2010 was
principally due to the 49% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which approximated $203 million at March
31, 2011, partially offset by the impact of the sale of the Corporations investment in CONTADO in
March 2011.
Deposits
and Borrowings
Deposits
A breakdown of the Corporations deposits at period-end is included in Table I.
TABLE I
Deposits Ending Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 Vs. |
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Demand deposits * |
|
$ |
5,496,313 |
|
|
$ |
5,501,430 |
|
|
$ |
(5,117 |
) |
|
$ |
5,040,104 |
|
|
$ |
456,209 |
|
Savings, NOW and money
market deposits |
|
|
10,683,029 |
|
|
|
10,371,580 |
|
|
|
311,449 |
|
|
|
9,791,033 |
|
|
|
891,996 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
11,017,332 |
|
|
|
10,889,190 |
|
|
|
128,142 |
|
|
|
10,529,175 |
|
|
|
488,157 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
27,196,674 |
|
|
$ |
26,762,200 |
|
|
$ |
434,474 |
|
|
$ |
25,360,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,836,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits. |
Brokered certificates of deposit, which are included as time deposits, amounted to $2.5 billion
at March 31, 2011 compared with $2.3 billion at December 31, 2010 and $2.4 billion at March 31,
2010.
102
The increase in savings deposits from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 was both in retail and
commercial accounts. The increase in time deposits was principally due to brokered certificates of
deposit.
The increase in demand and savings deposits from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 included
the impact of deposits assumed as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The increase
in time deposits from March 31, 2010 was in the BPPR reportable segment due to higher volume of
individual retirement accounts as well as retail time deposits and public funds.
Borrowings
The Corporations borrowings amounted to $6.7 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $6.9 billion
at December 31, 2010 and $5.0 billion at March 31, 2010. The decrease in borrowings from December
31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 was mostly related to a reduction of $470 million in the note issued to
the FDIC as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, which had a carrying amount of $2.0
billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $2.5 billion at December 31, 2010. This decrease was due
to the impact of payments of principal from loan collections submitted to the FDIC as part of the
note agreement during the quarter. Also, during the first quarter of
2011, the Corporation prepaid
$224 million of the note issued to the FDIC from funds unrelated to the assets securing the note.
The decline in borrowings was also influenced by the early extinguishment of $100 million in
medium-term notes. These reductions were partially offset by increases in repurchase agreements.
The increase in borrowings from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was also related to the
issuance of the note payable to the FDIC, partially offset by reductions in advances with the FHLB,
including the impact of early debt extinguishment of certain of these advances during 2010.
Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the
Corporations borrowings at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2010. Also, refer to
the Liquidity section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporations funding sources
at March 31, 2011.
Other liabilities
The
decrease in other liabilities of $206 million from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 was
principally due to contributions of $124.6 million to fund the Corporations pension plan.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity totaled $3.8 billion at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, compared with
$2.5 billion at March 31, 2010. Refer to the consolidated statements of condition and of
stockholders equity for information on the composition of stockholders equity. Also, the
disclosures of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), an integral component of
stockholders equity, are included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. The
increase in stockholders equity from March 31, 2010 to the same date in 2011 was mostly influenced
by the issuance of depositary shares and their conversion to common stock during the second quarter of
2010 which contributed with $1.15 billion in additional capital, and the net income recorded during
2010, principally from the sale of 51% interest in EVERTEC.
Included within surplus in stockholders equity at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and March 31,
2010 was $402 million corresponding to a statutory reserve fund applicable exclusively to Puerto
Rico banking institutions. The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a
minimum of 10% of BPPRs net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account
until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any
losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund.
Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of
the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient
statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. At March 31, 2011, BPPR was in
compliance with the statutory reserve requirement.
103
REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking
regulations. As indicated earlier, the EVERTEC transaction improved the Corporations capital
ratios considerably. The regulatory capital ratios and amounts of total risk-based capital, Tier 1
risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage at March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 are
presented on Table J. As of such dates, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized.
TABLE J
Capital Adequacy Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Risk-based capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital |
|
$ |
3,849,940 |
|
|
$ |
3,733,776 |
|
|
$ |
2,426,487 |
|
Supplementary (Tier II) capital |
|
|
321,996 |
|
|
|
328,107 |
|
|
|
371,025 |
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
4,171,936 |
|
|
$ |
4,061,883 |
|
|
$ |
2,797,512 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet items |
|
$ |
22,333,728 |
|
|
$ |
22,588,231 |
|
|
$ |
22,100,603 |
|
Off-balance sheet items |
|
|
2,917,145 |
|
|
|
3,099,186 |
|
|
|
3,401,589 |
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
25,250,873 |
|
|
$ |
25,687,417 |
|
|
$ |
25,502,192 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
37,829,693 |
|
|
$ |
38,400,026 |
|
|
$ |
33,060,219 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (minimum required 4.00%) |
|
|
15.25 |
% |
|
|
14.54 |
% |
|
|
9.51 |
% |
Total capital (minimum required 8.00%) |
|
|
16.52 |
|
|
|
15.81 |
|
|
|
10.97 |
|
Leverage ratio * |
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
|
9.72 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All banks are required to have a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted quarterly
average assets, depending on the banks classification. At March 31, 2011, the capital adequacy minimum
requirement for Popular, Inc. was (in thousands): Total Capital of $2,020,070, Tier I Capital of
$1,010,035, and Tier I Leverage of $1,134,891 based on a 3% ratio or $1,513,188 based on a 4% ratio
according to the Banks classification. |
The improvement in the Corporations regulatory capital ratios from December 31, 2010 to March
31, 2011 was principally due to: (i) a reduction in the deferred tax asset because of the impact of
the Puerto Rico tax reform (a portion which has been disallowed for regulatory capital purposes);
(ii) balance sheet composition including the increase in lower risk-assets such as investment
securities acquired in the quarter as previously described and mortgage loans; and (iii) internal
capital generation.
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities represent
restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1
capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements
(including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). At March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25%
limitation. Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. At March 31,
2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements exceeded the 25% limitation and, as such,
$40 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities were disallowed as Tier 1 capital.
Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in
Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. Effective March 31, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board
revised the quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital elements included in the
Tier 1 capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including
restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability.
Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, has a
provision to effectively phase-out the
use of trust preferred securities issued before May 19, 2010 as Tier 1 capital over a 3-year period
commencing on January 1, 2013. Trust preferred securities issued on or after May 19, 2010 no longer
qualify as Tier 1 capital. At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred
securities (capital securities) that are subject to the phase-out. The Corporation has not issued
any trust preferred securities since May 19, 2010. At March 31, 2011, the remaining trust preferred
securities corresponded to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The Dodd-Frank Act includes an exemption from the phase-out
provision that applies to these capital securities.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision revised the Capital
Accord (Basel III), which narrows the definition of capital and increases capital requirements for
specific exposures. The new capital requirements will be phased-in over six years beginning in
2013. If these revisions were adopted currently, the Corporation estimates they would not have a
significant negative impact on our regulatory capital ratios based on our current understanding of
the revisions to capital qualification. We await clarification from our banking regulators on their
interpretation of Basel III and any additional requirements to the stated thresholds.
104
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio was 8.02% at March 31, 2011 and 8.01% at
December 31, 2010. The Corporations Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio was 11.58%
at March 31, 2011, compared with 10.95% at December 31, 2010.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP measures.
Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital
adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets,
typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any other
measure calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (GAAP). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common
equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies
reporting measures with similar names.
The table that follows provides a reconciliation of total stockholders equity to tangible common
equity and total assets to tangible assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share or per share information) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,804,906 |
|
|
$ |
3,800,531 |
|
Less: Preferred stock |
|
|
(50,160 |
) |
|
|
(50,160 |
) |
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
(647,387 |
) |
|
|
(647,387 |
) |
Less: Other intangibles |
|
|
(56,441 |
) |
|
|
(58,696 |
) |
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,050,918 |
|
|
$ |
3,044,288 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
38,736,267 |
|
|
$ |
38,722,962 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
(647,387 |
) |
|
|
(647,387 |
) |
Less: Other intangibles |
|
|
(56,441 |
) |
|
|
(58,696 |
) |
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
38,032,439 |
|
|
$ |
38,016,879 |
|
|
Tangible common equity to tangible assets |
|
|
8.02 |
% |
|
|
8.01 |
% |
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,023,416,118 |
|
|
|
1,022,727,802 |
|
Tangible book value per common share |
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
$ |
2.98 |
|
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is another non-GAAP measure. Ratios
calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have become a focus of regulators and investors, and
management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common equity assist investors in analyzing the
Corporations capital position. In connection with the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program
(SCAP), the Federal Reserve Board began supplementing its assessment of the capital adequacy of a
bank holding company based on a variation of Tier 1 capital, known as Tier 1 common equity.
Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in
the federal banking regulations, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and
are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to
calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these
non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company,
they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a
substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
105
The following table reconciles the Corporations total common stockholders equity (GAAP) at March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 to Tier 1 common equity as defined by the Federal Reserve Board,
FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies (non-GAAP).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,754,746 |
|
|
$ |
3,750,371 |
|
Less: Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax [1] |
|
|
(141,747 |
) |
|
|
(159,700 |
) |
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets [2] |
|
|
(143,137 |
) |
|
|
(231,475 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(647,387 |
) |
|
|
(647,387 |
) |
Other disallowed intangibles |
|
|
(25,649 |
) |
|
|
(26,749 |
) |
Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of all non-financial equity investments |
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
Add: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax and accumulated net gains (losses)
on cash flow hedges [3] |
|
|
128,091 |
|
|
|
129,511 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
2,923,305 |
|
|
$ |
2,813,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
In accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable
fair values. In arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. |
|
[2] |
|
Approximately $106 million of the Corporations $251 million of net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2011 ($144 million
and $388 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010), were included without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the
risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $143 million of such assets at March 31, 2011 ($231 million at December 31,
2010) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as disallowed deferred tax assets, were deducted in arriving
at Tier 1 capital. The remaining $2 million of the Corporations other net deferred tax assets at March 31, 2011 ($13 million
at December 31, 2010) represented primarily the following items (a) the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets
subject to limitation under the guidelines; (b) the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability adjustment
recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income; and (c) the deferred tax liability associated with goodwill and
other intangibles. |
|
[3] |
|
The Federal Reserve Bank has granted interim capital relief for the impact of pension liability adjustment. |
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY
Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest,
renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including
certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table K.
The Corporations non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are
as follows:
|
|
|
Commercial and construction loans recognition of interest income on commercial and
construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on
payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of
principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to
principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past due. However, in the
case of collateral dependent loans individually evaluated for impairment, the excess of the
recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral (portion deemed as uncollectible)
is generally promptly charged-off, but in any event not later than the quarter following
the quarter in which such excess was first recognized. |
|
|
|
|
Lease financing recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when
loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in
arrears. |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is generally
discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or
interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days
past due. |
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and
home-equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears
on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer
loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end
consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end consumer loans
are charged-off when they are 180 days in arrears. |
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) loans classified as TDRs are reported in
non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification.
The TDR loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a
willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six
months of sustained performance after classified as a TDR). |
|
|
|
|
Acquired covered loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are restructured
after acquisition are not considered restructured loans for purposes of the Corporations
accounting and disclosure if the loans are accounted for in pools pursuant to ASC Subtopic
310-30. |
106
|
|
|
Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of
credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with
ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into
pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset
with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The
covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not
considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is
a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be
collected. Also, loans charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in
purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs will be recorded only to
the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates. |
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which
requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in
excess of the Corporations initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest
income using the effective yield method over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance with
the Corporations non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued. |
|
|
|
|
Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and
the loss protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the
Corporation has determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude
such covered loans to facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across quarters
or year-to-date periods. Given the significant amount of covered loans that are past due
but still accruing due to the accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation
believes the inclusion of these loans in certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or
denominator (or both) would result in a significant distortion to these ratios. In
addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are recorded against the
non-accretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans is lower for
portfolios that have significant amounts of covered loans. The inclusion of these loans in
the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across quarters or years,
and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by
acquisition accounting. The Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality
measures excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and
denominator provides better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of
its loan portfolio. |
107
TABLE K
Non-Performing Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of loans HIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of loans HIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of loans HIP |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
by category [2] |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
by category |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
by category |
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
752,338 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
$ |
725,027 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
$ |
836,509 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
224,159 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
238,554 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
852,095 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
5,312 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5,937 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
7,837 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
599,361 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
542,033 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
558,384 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
53,970 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
60,302 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
58,431 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Total non-performing loans held-in-
portfolio, excluding covered loans |
|
|
1,635,140 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
1,571,853 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
2,313,256 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Non-performing loans held-for-sale |
|
|
464,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (OREO),
excluding covered OREO |
|
|
156,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets,
excluding covered assets |
|
$ |
2,256,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,405,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,448,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans and OREO [1] |
|
|
79,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
2,335,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,488,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,448,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or
more [3] |
|
$ |
332,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
338,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios excluding covered loans
and OREO [4]: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio
to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
7.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total
assets |
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans, excluding
held-for-sale |
|
|
44.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios including covered loans
and OREO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans held-in-portfolio
to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total
assets |
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans, excluding
held-for-sale |
|
|
44.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
HIP = held-in-portfolio
The amount consists of $13 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $66 million in covered OREO at March 31, 2011, and $26 million and $58 million,
respectively, at December 31, 2010. It excludes covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which
these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses. |
|
[2] |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio used in the computation exclude $4.7 billion in covered loans at March 31, 2011 and $4.8 billion at December 31, 2010. |
|
[3] |
|
The carrying value of covered loans accounted for under ASC Sub-topic 310-30 that are contractually 90 days or more past due was $1.1 billion at March 31, 2011 and $916 million at December 31,
2010. This amount is excluded from the above table as the covered loans accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status. |
|
[4] |
|
These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of covered loans and covered foreclosed property. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected
in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of acquired loans in certain asset quality ratios that include non-performing assets, past due loans or net charge-offs in the
numerator and denominator results in distortions of these ratios and they may not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that were not impacted by purchase accounting. |
At March 31, 2011, non-performing loans secured by real estate held-in-portfolio, excluding
covered loans, amounted to $1.1 billion in the Puerto Rico operations and $394 million in the U.S. mainland operations. These figures compare to $811 million in the Puerto Rico
operations and $404 million in the U.S. mainland operations at December 31, 2010.
In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table K, at March 31, 2011, there were $93
million of performing loans, excluding covered loans, which in managements opinion are currently
subject to potential future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired, compared
with $111 million at December 31, 2010.
108
Table L summarized the detail of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including
charge-offs and recoveries by loan category, for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
TABLE L
Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Non-covered |
|
|
Covered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
793,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
793,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
59,762 |
|
|
$ |
15,557 |
|
|
|
75,319 |
|
|
|
240,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
852,987 |
|
|
|
15,557 |
|
|
|
868,544 |
|
|
|
1,501,404 |
|
|
Losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
84,289 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
85,996 |
|
|
|
86,952 |
|
Construction |
|
|
15,187 |
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
19,532 |
|
|
|
52,407 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,562 |
|
|
|
28,602 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
53,391 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
53,737 |
|
|
|
70,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
164,703 |
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
171,101 |
|
|
|
243,841 |
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
12,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,463 |
|
|
|
7,835 |
|
Construction |
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
8,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,415 |
|
|
|
7,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
25,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,255 |
|
|
|
19,473 |
|
|
Net loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
71,826 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
73,533 |
|
|
|
79,117 |
|
Construction |
|
|
13,168 |
|
|
|
4,345 |
|
|
|
17,513 |
|
|
|
51,438 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
3,934 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
27,374 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
44,976 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
45,322 |
|
|
|
62,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
139,448 |
|
|
|
6,398 |
|
|
|
145,846 |
|
|
|
224,368 |
|
|
Recovery related to loans transferred to loans held-for-sale |
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
727,346 |
|
|
$ |
9,159 |
|
|
$ |
736,505 |
|
|
$ |
1,277,036 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.31 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
0.43x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.52x |
|
|
|
1.07x |
|
|
The allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans decreased from $1.3 billion at March 31,
2010 to $727 million at March 31, 2011. The decrease reflects a reduction in the Corporations
general allowance and specific allowance components of $222 million and $328 million, respectively.
The reduction in the general allowance component for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, was
primarily attributable to a lower portfolio balance, driven principally by the previously reported
transfer to loans-held-for sale of approximately $603 million (book value) in Puerto Rico
construction and commercial real estate loans, and approximately $396 million (book value) of U.S.
non-conventional mortgages, coupled with loans paid-offs, principal repayments and the overall
reduction in the Corporations net charge-offs, principally from the construction, mortgage and
consumer loan portfolios. The decrease in the specific allowance component was mainly driven by:
(i) the Corporations decision to accelerate the charge-off of previously reserved impaired amounts
of collateral dependent loans both in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland and (ii) a lower level of
problem loans remaining in loans held-in-portfolio, as a result of the loans
held-for-sale reclassification in the
BPPR and BPNA reportable segments.
109
Table M that follows presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio
(HIP) for the non-covered portfolio by loan category for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010.
TABLE M
Annualized Net Charge-offs to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Non-covered loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
11.46 |
|
|
|
12.30 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
Total annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
Note: Average loans held-in-portfolio excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction which were
recorded at fair value on date of acquisition, and thus, considered a credit discount component.
The Corporations annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio
ratio decreased 111 basis points, from 3.85% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to 2.74% for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011. The decrease was mainly driven by
the loan reclassifications that
took place in the fourth quarter of 2010. In December 2010, the Corporation transferred
approximately $603 million (book value) of commercial and construction loans of the BPPR reportable segment and
$396 million (book value) of non-conventional mortgage loans of the U.S. mainland reportable segment, mainly
non-accruing loans, from the held-in-portfolio to held-for-sale category, at the lower of cost or
fair value. This transfer has benefited the Corporation in terms of net charge-offs and loan
delinquencies in each portfolio, driven by a lower level of problem
loans remaining in loans held-in-portfolio. The reduction in the net charge-off ratio was also related to the improvement in the
credit quality of certain portfolios and the positive results of steps taken by the Corporation to
mitigate the overall credit risks.
Commercial loans
The level of non-performing commercial loans held-in portfolio at March 31,
2011, compared to December 31, 2010, increased on a consolidated
basis by $27 million, which was
mostly related to the BPPR reportable segment. The percentage of non-performing commercial
non-covered loans held-in-portfolio to commercial non-covered loans held-in-portfolio increased
from 6.36% at December 31, 2010 to 6.76% at March 31, 2011. This increase was mainly attributed to
weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico, which have continued to adversely impact the commercial
loan delinquency rates. As previously mentioned, the level of non-performing commercial loans
held-in-portfolio in the Puerto Rico operations at March 31, 2011 remained high while the level of
non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio in the United States operations has reflected
certain signs of stabilization. For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, additions to commercial loans
in non-performing status at the BPPR (excluding commercial lines of credit and business credit
cards) and BPNA reportable segments amounted to $121 million and $50 million, respectively, a
decrease of $16 million in the BPPR reportable segments and $49 million in the BPNA reportable
segment, when compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2010. Although at lower levels, new
non-performing commercial loans continue to be mostly driven by the current economic conditions at
both markets, principally in Puerto Rico.
The table that follows provides information on commercial non-performing loans at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPPR (excluding the Westernbank covered loan portfolio) and
BPNA reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing commercial loans |
|
$ |
526,930 |
|
|
$ |
485,469 |
|
|
$ |
512,822 |
|
Non-performing commercial
loans to commercial loans HIP,
both excluding covered loans
and loans held-for-sale |
|
|
7.95 |
% |
|
|
7.26 |
% |
|
|
7.36 |
% |
Commercial loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
38,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,700 |
|
Commercial loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average commercial loans HIP,
excluding covered loans and
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing commercial loans |
|
$ |
225,408 |
|
|
$ |
239,558 |
|
|
$ |
323,620 |
|
Non-performing commercial
loans to commercial loans HIP,
excluding loans held-for-sale |
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
Commercial loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
33,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,418 |
|
Commercial loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average commercial loans HIP,
excluding loans held-for-sale |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
110
There were 2 commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with
an aggregate outstanding balance of approximately $32 million at March 31, 2011, compared with 1
commercial loan relationship with an outstanding debt of approximately $10 million at December 31,
2010, and 6 commercial loan relationships with an outstanding debt of approximately $86 million at
March 31, 2010.
The
Corporations commercial loan net charge-offs, excluding net
charge-offs for covered loans, for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 decreased by
$7 million when compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2010. This reduction was primarily in the
BPNA reportable segment offset by an increase in the BPPR reportable segment. The decrease in the
commercial loan net charge-offs at the BPNA reportable segment was mostly attributable to a lower
volume of commercial loans due to run-off of the legacy portfolio of exited or downsized business
lines at BPNA, accompanied by certain signs of credit stabilization in this reportable segment
reflected in the reduction of approximately $14 million in non-performing loans from December 31,
2010 to March 31, 2011. The increase in commercial loan net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 in
the BPPR reportable segment as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was principally due to
the recessionary environment. The commercial loan portfolio in Puerto Rico continues to reflect
high delinquencies and reductions in the value of the underlying collateral. For the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, the charge-offs associated to collateral dependent commercial loans amounted to
approximately $27 million and $7 million in the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments, respectively.
The allowance for loan losses corresponding to commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding
covered loans, represented 3.67% of that portfolio at March 31, 2011, compared with 4.06% at
December 31, 2010. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the
commercial loan category was 54.21% at March 31, 2011, compared with 63.78% at December 31, 2010.
The decrease in the ratio was principally driven by a lower allowance for loan losses for the
commercial loan portfolio of the BPPR reportable segment. The allowance for loan losses at the BPNA reportable segment also decreased, prompted by a
lower portfolio balance, a lower level of problem loans remaining in the portfolio, in combination
with an improvement in the U.S. economy.
The Corporations commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (CRE), excluding construction
and covered loans, amounted to $6.9 billion at March 31, 2011,
of which $3.1 billion was secured
with owner occupied properties, compared with $7.0 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, at
December 31, 2010. CRE non-performing loans, excluding covered
loans amounted to $543 million at
March 31, 2011, compared to $553 million at December 31, 2010. The CRE non-performing loans ratios
for the Corporations Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland operations
were 10.03% and 5.50%, respectively, at
March 31, 2011, compared with 9.61% and 5.79%, respectively, at December 31, 2010.
At March 31, 2010, the Corporations commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans,
included a total of $145 million of loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $3
million for the BPNA reportable segment, which were considered TDRs since they involved granting a
concession to borrowers under financial difficulties.
The outstanding commitments for these commercial loan TDRs amounted
to $2 million in the BPPR reportable segment and no
commitments outstanding in the BPNA reportable segment at March 31,
2011.
The commercial loan TDRs in
non-performing status for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments at March 31, 2011 amounted to $85
million and $3 million, respectively. The commercial loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment
resulting in no specific reserve for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments at March 31, 2011. The
impaired portions of collateral dependent commercial loans TDRs were charged-off during the fourth
quarter of 2010.
Construction loans
Non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio decreased slightly from December 31, 2010 to
March 31, 2011 mainly attributed to net charge-offs and a lower level of problem loans remaining in
the held-in-portfolio classification for the Puerto Rico and U.S. operations. The ratio of non-performing construction
loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased from 47.63% at
December 31, 2010 to 51.01% at March 31, 2011, mainly due to reductions in the loan portfolio. The
ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio was 52.64% at
March 31, 2010.
Additions to construction non-performing loans at the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $12 million in each reportable segment, compared with
additions of $37 million in each segment for the quarter ended December 31, 2010. The reduced level
of new non-performing construction loans at both reportable segments was mainly driven by a lower
level of problem loans in the remaining construction loan portfolio classified as
held-in-portfolio, principally prompted by the construction loans held-for-sale reclassification that
took place in the fourth quarter of 2010 at the BPPR segment and the downsizing of the construction
loan portfolio at the BPNA reportable segment.
There were 7 construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status with
an aggregate outstanding balance of $103 million at March 31, 2011, compared with 7 construction
loan relationships with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $99 million at December 31,
2010. At March 31, 2010, there were 22 construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in
non-performing status with an aggregate outstanding debt of $554 million. Although the portfolio
balance of construction loans held-in-portfolio has decreased considerably, the construction loan
portfolio is considered one of the high-risk portfolios of the
111
Corporation as it continues to be
adversely impacted by weak economic and real estate market conditions, particularly in Puerto Rico.
Construction loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, compared with the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, decreased by $18.6 million and $19.6 million in the BPPR and BPNA reportable
segments, respectively. The decrease in the BPPR reportable segment was prompted principally by
the previously mentioned reclassification of construction loans held-for-sale that took place in
the fourth quarter of 2010, which resulted in a lower level of problem loans in the remaining
portfolio. There were also decreases in loan portfolio and non-performing loans in the BPNA
reportable segment.
The construction loan portfolio of the BPPR reportable segment continues to be impacted by
generally weak market conditions, decreases in property values, oversupply in certain areas, and
reduced absorption rates. At the BPNA reportable segment, the decline in construction loan net
charge-offs was mainly driven by a lower loan portfolio balance, coupled with certain stabilization
observed in the U.S. real estate market. For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the charge-offs
associated to collateral dependent construction loans amounted to approximately $9 million in the
BPPR reportable segment and $5 million in BPNA reportable segment.
Management has identified construction loans considered impaired and has charged-off specific
reserves based on the value of the collateral. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to
construction loans, represented 8.92% of that portfolio, excluding covered loans, at March 31,
2011, compared with 9.53% at December 31, 2010. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans
held-in-portfolio in the construction loans category was 17.49% at March 31, 2011, compared with
20.01% at December 31, 2010. As explained before, the decrease
was driven by a lower level of net charge-offs, thus, requiring a
lower allowance,
coupled with decreases in loan portfolio and non-performing loans in the U.S. mainland reportable
segment.
The BPPR reportable segment construction loan portfolio, excluding covered loans and loans
held-for-sale, totaled $149 million at March 31, 2011, compared with $168 million at December 31,
2010 and $1.0 billion at March 31, 2010. The decrease in the ratio of non-performing construction
loans held-in-portfolio to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, was
primarily attributed to the reclassification to loans held-for-sale during the fourth quarter of
2010, mostly of non-accruing loans, coupled with the net charge-offs activity in this portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR
reportable segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $11 million or 7.66% of construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding
covered loans, at March 31, 2011 compared to $16 million or 9.55%, respectively, at December 31,
2010.
The table that follows provides information on construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs
information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPPR reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans |
|
$ |
57,176 |
|
|
$ |
64,678 |
|
|
$ |
629,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction
loans to construction loans HIP,
both excluding covered loans and
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
38.30 |
% |
|
|
38.42 |
% |
|
|
60.58 |
% |
Construction loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
8,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average construction loans HIP,
excluding covered loans and
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
22.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.07 |
% |
|
The table that follows provides information on construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs
information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPNA reportable segment.
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31,2011 |
|
|
December 31,2010 |
|
|
March 31,2010 |
|
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans |
|
$ |
166,983 |
|
|
$ |
173,876 |
|
|
$ |
222,795 |
|
Non-performing construction
loans to construction loans HIP,
excluding loans held-for-sale |
|
|
57.56 |
% |
|
|
52.29 |
% |
|
|
38.41 |
% |
Construction loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
5,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,780 |
|
Construction loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average construction loans HIP,
excluding loans held-for-sale |
|
|
6.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.16 |
% |
|
The BPNA reportable segment construction loan portfolio totaled $290 million at March 31, 2011,
compared with $332 million at December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the
construction loan portfolio for the BPNA reportable segment totaled $28 million or 9.57% of
construction loans held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2011, compared to $32 million or 9.52%,
respectively, at December 31, 2010. The reduction in net charge-offs observed in the construction
loan portfolio of the BPNA reportable segment for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, when compared
to same quarter in 2010, was attributable to a lower portfolio balance, lower level of problem
loans remaining in the portfolio, coupled with an improvement in the U.S. economy.
The
construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans,
included $0.3 million in TDRs for the BPPR
reportable segment and $86 million for the BPNA reportable segment, which were considered TDRs at
March 31, 2011. The outstanding commitments for these construction TDR loans at March 31, 2011 were
$0.4 million for the BPPR reportable segment and no outstanding
commitments for the BPNA reportable segment. There were $0.3 million
in
construction TDR loans in non-performing status for the BPPR
reportable segment and $86 million in
the BPNA reportable segment at March 31, 2011. These construction TDR loans were individually
evaluated for impairment resulting in no specific reserves for the BPPR and BPNA reportable
segments at March 31, 2011. The impaired portions of collateral dependent construction TDR loans
were charged-off during the fourth quarter of 2010.
In the current stressed housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become
the most important factor in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate level of
the allowance for loan losses. The likelihood of losses that are equal to the entire recorded
investment for a real estate loan is remote. However, in some cases during recent quarters
declining real estate values have resulted in the determination that the estimated value of the
collateral was insufficient to cover all of the recorded investment in the loans.
Mortgage loans
Non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased $57 million from December 31, 2010 to
March 31, 2011, primarily as a result of an increase of $54 million in the BPPR reportable segment,
accompanied by an increase of $3 million in the BPNA reportable segment. The increase in the BPPR
reportable segment was driven principally by the slow economic activity in Puerto Rico, coupled
with the level of mortgage loans repurchased under credit recourse arrangements. During the first
quarter of 2011, the BPPR reportable segment repurchased $63 million of mortgage loans under credit
recourse arrangements, an increase of $35 million, when compared to $28 million for the fourth
quarter of 2010. The mortgage business has continued to be negatively impacted by the recessionary
economic conditions in Puerto Rico as evidenced by the increased levels of non-performing mortgage
loans, and high delinquency rates.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, approximately $396 million (book value) of U.S. non-conventional
residential mortgage loans were reclassified as loans held-for-sale at the BPNA reportable segment,
most of which were delinquent mortgage loans, mortgages in non-performing status, or troubled debt
restructurings.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporations mortgage loan net charge-offs to average
mortgage loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.74%, down by 169 basis points when compared to the
quarter ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in the mortgage loan net charge-off ratio was mainly due
to lower losses in the U.S. mainland non-conventional mortgage business driven by the previously
explained loans held-for-sale transaction that took place in December 31, 2010.
At the BPPR reportable segment, the mortgage loan net charge-offs (excluding covered loans) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 amounted to $7.7 million, an increase of $4.1 million, when compared
to same quarter in 2010. The mortgage business has continued to be negatively impacted by the
current economic conditions in Puerto Rico which has resulted in increased levels of non-performing
mortgage loans. However, high reinstatement experience associated with the mortgage loans under
foreclosure process in Puerto Rico have helped to maintain losses at manageable levels.
The BPPR reportable segments mortgage loans held-in-portfolio (excluding covered loans) totaled
$4.0 billion at March 31, 2011, compared with $3.6 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in
mortgage loans held-in-portfolio (excluding covered loans) for the
113
BPPR reportable segment was as a
result of the acquisition of approximately $236 million in unpaid principal balance of performing
residential mortgage loans, loans repurchased under credit recourse arrangements and the loan
origination activity in this reportable segment. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to
the mortgage loan portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment,
excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $56 million or 1.39% of
mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at
March 31, 2011, compared to $42
million or 1.15% at December 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, the mortgage loan TDRs for
the BPPRs reportable segment amounted to $209 million (including $67 million guaranteed by U.S.
Government sponsored entities), of which $128 million were in non-performing status. Although the
criteria for specific impairment excludes large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that
are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it specifically requires its
application to modifications considered TDRs. These mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for
impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $7 million at March 31, 2011.
There were no outstanding commitments for these mortgage loan TDRs in the BPPR reportable segment at March 31, 2011.
The table that follows provides information on mortgage non-performing loans at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs
information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPPR reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing mortgage loans |
|
$ |
571,379 |
|
|
$ |
517,443 |
|
|
$ |
377,524 |
|
Non-performing mortgage
loans to mortgage loans HIP,
both excluding covered loans
and loans held-for-sale |
|
|
14.18 |
% |
|
|
14.19 |
% |
|
|
11.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
7,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,590 |
|
Mortgage loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average mortgage loans HIP,
excluding covered loans and
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
The BPNA reportable segment mortgage loan portfolio totaled $865 million at March 31, 2011,
compared with $875 million at December 31, 2010. As compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2010,
this portfolio has reflected better performance in terms of losses.
The table that follows provides information on mortgage non-performing loans at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs
information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPNA reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing mortgage loans |
|
$ |
26,355 |
|
|
$ |
23,587 |
|
|
$ |
179,376 |
|
Non-performing mortgage
loans to mortgage loans HIP,
excluding loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
12.69 |
% |
Mortgage loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,785 |
|
Mortgage loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average mortgage loans HIP,
excluding loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.59 |
% |
|
As explained previously, in December 2010, approximately $396 million (book value) of U.S.
non-conventional residential mortgage loans were reclassified as loans held-for-sale at the BPNA
reportable segment, most of which were delinquent mortgage loans, mortgages in non-performing
status, or troubled debt restructurings. Substantially all these loans were sold in the first
quarter of 2011.
BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio outstanding at March 31, 2011 amounted to
approximately $509 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $18 million, which
represents 3.54% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $513 million with a related
allowance for loan losses of $22 million or 4.29%, respectively, at December 31, 2010. The
Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA.
There were no net charge-offs for BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan held-in-portfolio for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 because most of this portfolio was classified as held-for-sale and
adjusted to fair value in December 2010. Net charge-offs of BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan
held-in-portfolio amounted to $21.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and represented
8.37% of average non-conventional mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for that period.
At March 31, 2011, mortgage loans held-in-portfolio
included a total of $5 million in TDRs for the BPNA reportable
segment.
There were no outstanding commitments for these mortgage loan TDRs. The mortgage loan TDRs in non-performing status for the BPNA
reportable segment at March 31, 2011 amounted to
114
$1 million. The
mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in specific reserve of
$1 million for the BPNA reportable segment at March 31, 2011.
Consumer loans
Non-performing consumer loans (excluding covered loans) decreased from December 31, 2010 to March
31, 2011, as a result of decreases of $3 million and $4 million in the BPPR and BPNA reportable
segments, respectively. The decrease in the BPPR reportable segment was principally related to an
overall improvement in most of the consumer lines of business, mainly personal and auto loans, as
these portfolios continue to reflect certain signs of a more stable credit performance. The
decrease in the BPNA reportable segment was primarily associated with home equity lines of credit
and closed-end second mortgages, which are categorized by the Corporation as consumer loans. This
portfolio has experienced improvements in delinquency levels.
Consumer loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer loans held-in-portfolio
decreased mostly due to lower delinquencies in certain portfolios in Puerto Rico and in the U.S.
mainland. The decrease in the ratio of consumer loans net charge-offs to average consumer loans
held-in-portfolio in both segments was attributable to an improvement in the delinquency levels, as
the portfolios continue to reflect certain signs of stable credit performance.
The table that follows provides information on consumer non-performing loans at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPPR reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing consumer loans |
|
$ |
34,659 |
|
|
$ |
37,236 |
|
|
$ |
37,278 |
|
Non-performing consumer
loans to consumer loans HIP,
both excluding covered loans
and loans held-for-sale |
|
|
1.21 |
% |
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
Consumer loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
28,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,164 |
|
Consumer loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average consumer loans HIP,
excluding covered loans and
loans held-for-sale |
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
The table that follows provides information on mortgage non-performing loans at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs information for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for the BPNA reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing consumer loans |
|
$ |
19,311 |
|
|
$ |
23,066 |
|
|
$ |
21,153 |
|
Non-performing consumer
loans to consumer loans HIP,
excluding loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
2.30 |
% |
Consumer loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
16,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,341 |
|
Consumer loan net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average consumer loans HIP,
excluding loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
8.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.53 |
% |
|
As previously explained, the decrease in non-performing consumer loans for the BPNA reportable
segment was attributable in part to home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages. As
compared to 2010, these loan portfolios showed signs of improved performance due to significant
charge-offs recorded in previous quarters improving the quality of the remaining portfolio,
combined with aggressive collection efforts and loan modification programs. Combined net
charge-offs for E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages amounted to
approximately $11 million or 10.52% of this particular average loan portfolio for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, compared with $19.5 million or 14.81%, respectively, for the quarter ended March 31,
2010. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this subsidiary ceased originating these types of loans. Home
equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is
secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrowers residence, allows customers to borrow
against the equity in their home. Real estate market values at the time the loan or line is granted
directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact the
severity of losses. E-LOANs portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second
mortgages outstanding at March 31, 2011 totaled $416 million with a related allowance for loan
losses of $35 million, representing 8.42% of that particular portfolio. E-LOANs portfolio of home
equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2010 totaled
$437 million with a related allowance for loan losses of
$41 million, representing 9.29% of that
particular portfolio.
Troubled debt restructurings
115
In general, loans classified as TDRs are maintained in accrual status if the loan was in accrual
status at the time of the modification. Other factors considered in this determination include a
credit evaluation of the borrowers financial condition and prospects for repayment under the
revised terms.
The following tables present the loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accruing |
|
|
Non-Accruing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
60,771 |
|
|
$ |
87,258 |
|
|
$ |
148,029 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,712 |
|
|
|
86,712 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
85,719 |
|
|
|
128,608 |
|
|
|
214,327 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
121,304 |
|
|
|
9,208 |
|
|
|
130,512 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
267,794 |
|
|
$ |
311,786 |
|
|
$ |
579,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accruing |
|
|
Non-Accruing |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
77,278 |
|
|
$ |
80,919 |
|
|
$ |
158,197 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,184 |
|
|
|
92,184 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
68,831 |
|
|
|
107,791 |
|
|
|
176,622 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
123,012 |
|
|
|
10,804 |
|
|
|
133,816 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
269,121 |
|
|
$ |
291,698 |
|
|
$ |
560,819 |
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more disclosed in Table K consist primarily of credit cards, FHA
/ VA and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporations
financial statements pursuant to GNMAs buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA
mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the
option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option.
Also, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from
other financial institutions that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment
from the sellers / servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse
agreements. However, residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions,
which are in the process of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Refer to the 2010 Annual Report for detailed description of the Corporations accounting policy for
determining the allowance for loan losses and for the Corporations definition of impaired loans.
Allowance for loan losses for loans related to the non-covered loan portfolio
The following tables set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporations
allowance for loan losses (ALLL), excluding the allowance for the covered loan portfolio, at
March 31, 2011, December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010 by loan category and by whether the allowance
and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for specific
impairment or through a general valuation allowance.
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Lease Financing |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Specific ALLL [1] |
|
$ |
9,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
Impaired loans [1] |
|
|
460,028 |
|
|
$ |
217,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
824,946 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired loans |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
General ALLL [2] |
|
$ |
398,114 |
|
|
$ |
39,204 |
|
|
$ |
10,343 |
|
|
$ |
71,944 |
|
|
$ |
189,849 |
|
|
$ |
709,454 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired
loans [2] |
|
|
10,664,303 |
|
|
|
221,507 |
|
|
|
592,091 |
|
|
|
4,748,656 |
|
|
|
3,625,286 |
|
|
|
19,851,843 |
|
General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans [1] |
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
|
17.70 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.52 |
% |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
407,840 |
|
|
$ |
39,204 |
|
|
$ |
10,343 |
|
|
$ |
80,110 |
|
|
$ |
189,849 |
|
|
$ |
727,346 |
|
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [2] |
|
|
11,124,331 |
|
|
|
439,399 |
|
|
|
592,091 |
|
|
|
4,895,682 |
|
|
|
3,625,286 |
|
|
|
20,676,789 |
|
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [2] |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
8.92 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes impaired covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. |
|
[2] |
|
Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The general allowance on these loans amounted to $9 million at
March 31, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Lease Financing |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
8,550 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
Impaired loans [1] |
|
|
445,968 |
|
|
|
231,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798,499 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1] |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.72 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
453,841 |
|
|
$ |
47,508 |
|
|
$ |
13,153 |
|
|
$ |
65,864 |
|
|
$ |
199,089 |
|
|
$ |
779,455 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding
impaired loans [1] |
|
|
10,947,517 |
|
|
|
269,529 |
|
|
|
602,993 |
|
|
|
4,403,513 |
|
|
|
3,705,984 |
|
|
|
19,929,536 |
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio, excluding
impaired loans [1] |
|
|
4.15 |
% |
|
|
17.63 |
% |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
462,391 |
|
|
$ |
47,724 |
|
|
$ |
13,153 |
|
|
$ |
70,868 |
|
|
$ |
199,089 |
|
|
$ |
793,225 |
|
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1] |
|
|
11,393,485 |
|
|
|
500,851 |
|
|
|
602,993 |
|
|
|
4,524,722 |
|
|
|
3,705,984 |
|
|
|
20,728,035 |
|
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1] |
|
|
4.06 |
% |
|
|
9.53 |
% |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
1.57 |
% |
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes covered loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Lease Financing |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
120,419 |
|
|
$ |
160,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
345,605 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
|
662,697 |
|
|
|
841,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,754,979 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired loans |
|
|
18.17 |
% |
|
|
19.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.69 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
342,023 |
|
|
$ |
186,849 |
|
|
$ |
18,653 |
|
|
$ |
100,081 |
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
|
$ |
931,431 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding
impaired loans |
|
|
11,587,894 |
|
|
|
777,785 |
|
|
|
653,734 |
|
|
|
4,397,984 |
|
|
|
3,905,923 |
|
|
|
21,323,320 |
|
General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
24.02 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
462,442 |
|
|
$ |
347,244 |
|
|
$ |
18,653 |
|
|
$ |
164,872 |
|
|
$ |
283,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,277,036 |
|
Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
12,250,591 |
|
|
|
1,618,828 |
|
|
|
653,734 |
|
|
|
4,649,223 |
|
|
|
3,905,923 |
|
|
|
23,078,299 |
|
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
21.45 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
3.55 |
% |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
5.53 |
% |
|
As compared to December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 decreased by
approximately $66 million from 3.83% to 3.52% as a percentage of loans held-in-portfolio. This
decrease considers a reduction in the Corporations general allowance component of approximately
$70 million and an increase in the specific allowance component of approximately $4 million.
117
The
reduction in the general component of the allowance for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, was primarily
attributable to a lower level of net charge-offs, principally from the Corporations commercial,
construction and consumer loan portfolios. The allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio at March 31, 2010 was 5.53%.
The
decrease in the allowance for loan losses,
excluding the allowance for covered loans, for the commercial loan portfolio at March 31, 2011
when compared with December 31, 2010 was mainly related to a reduction of $37 million and $19
million in the general component of the allowance for loan losses of the Puerto Rico segment and
U.S. mainland segment, respectively, principally due to a lower level of net charge-offs. The
general component of the allowance for loan losses of the construction loan portfolio amounted to
$39 million at March 31, 2011, a decrease of $8 million compared with December 31, 2010. This
decrease was prompted principally by the previously mentioned reclassification of construction
loans held-for-sale of the BPPR reportable segment that took place in the fourth quarter of 2010,
which resulted in a lower level of problem loans in the remaining portfolio, coupled with decreases
in loan portfolio and non-performing loans in the U.S. mainland reportable segment.
The allowance for loan losses of the mortgage loan portfolio,
excluding the allowance for covered loans, increased by $9
million from $71 million at December 31, 2010 to $80 million at March 31, 2011. The increase was
principally driven by the BPPR reportable segment which contributed with a higher loan portfolio
balance, higher net charge-offs and an increase in specific reserves on mortgage loan TDRs,
partially offset by the decreases in the volume of mortgage loans and related net charge-offs in
the BPNA reportable segment, as a result of the previously explained held-for-sale transaction.
The allowance for loan losses of the consumer loan portfolio,
excluding the allowance for covered loans, decreased by $9
million from $199 million at December 31, 2010 to $190 million at March 31, 2011. Most consumer
loan portfolios both in Puerto Rico and the U.S. mainland have continued to reflect favorable
credit trends.
The following table presents the Corporations recorded investment in commercial, construction and
mortgage loans that were considered impaired and the related valuation allowance at March 31, 2011,
December 31, 2010, and March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Valuation |
|
(In millions) |
|
Investment |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
$ |
187.6 |
|
|
$ |
17.9 |
|
|
$ |
154.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,329.0 |
|
|
$ |
345.6 |
|
No valuation allowance required |
|
|
637.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
824.9 |
|
|
$ |
17.9 |
|
|
$ |
798.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,755.0 |
|
|
$ |
345.6 |
|
|
With respect to the $637 million portfolio of impaired commercial and construction loans for
which no allowance for loan losses was required at March 31, 2011, management followed the guidance
for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the impairment may
be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired loan
discounted at the loans original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of the
impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan
is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the
underlying collateral. At March 31, 2011, $610 million or 96% of the $637 million impaired
commercial and construction loans with no valuation allowance were
collateral dependent loans. For collateral dependent loans, management performed an analysis based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated
costs to sell, and determined that the collateral was deemed adequate
to cover any inherent losses at March
31, 2011. Impaired portions on collateral dependent commercial and construction loans were
charged-off during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Average impaired loans during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were $812
million and $1.7 billion, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on impaired
loans of $3.3 million and $4.5 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010,
respectively.
The following tables set forth the activity in the specific reserves for impaired loans, excluding
covered loans, for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table - Activity in Specific ALLL for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
Construction Loans |
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Specific allowance for loan losses at January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
8,550 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
5,004 |
|
|
$ |
13,770 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
34,742 |
|
|
|
14,385 |
|
|
|
17,618 |
|
|
|
66,745 |
|
Recoveries related to loans transferred to LHFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,807 |
) |
|
|
(13,807 |
) |
Less: Net charge-offs |
|
|
33,566 |
|
|
|
14,601 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
48,816 |
|
|
Specific allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
9,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,166 |
|
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table - Activity in Specific ALLL for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
Construction Loans |
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Specific allowance for loan losses at January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
108,769 |
|
|
$ |
162,907 |
|
|
$ |
52,211 |
|
|
$ |
323,887 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
50,750 |
|
|
|
48,429 |
|
|
|
18,981 |
|
|
|
118,160 |
|
Less: Net charge-offs |
|
|
39,100 |
|
|
|
50,941 |
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
96,442 |
|
|
Specific allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
120,419 |
|
|
$ |
160,395 |
|
|
$ |
64,791 |
|
|
$ |
345,605 |
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, total net charge-offs for individually evaluated impaired
loans amounted to approximately $48.8 million, of which $36.7 million pertained to the BPPR
reportable segment and $12.1 million to the BPNA reportable segment. Most of these net charge-offs
were related to the commercial and construction portfolios. The decrease in net charge-offs for
loans considered impaired was attributable to: (i) the benefits provided by the previously
mentioned reclassification of commercial, construction and mortgage loans held-for-sale that took
place in the fourth quarter of 2010, which resulted in a lower level of problem loans in the
remaining portfolio, and (ii) a lower portfolio balance of commercial loans at the BPNA reportable
segment, driven by the Corporations decision to exit or downsize certain business lines.
The Corporation requests updated appraisal reports from pre-approved appraisers for loans that are
considered impaired and are individually analyzed following the Corporations reappraisal policy. This
policy requires updated appraisals for loans secured by real estate (including construction loans)
either annually, every two or three years depending on the total exposure of the borrower. As a
general procedure, the specialized appraisal review unit of the Corporations Credit Risk
Management Division internally reviews appraisals following certain materiality benchmarks. In
addition to evaluating the reasonability of the appraisal reports, these reviews monitor that
appraisals are performed following the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
(USPAP).
Appraisals may be adjusted due to age or general market conditions. The adjustments applied are
based upon internal information, like other appraisals and/or loss severity information that can
provide historical trends in the real estate market. Specifically, in commercial and construction
loans for the BPPR reportable segment, and depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments
can range from 10% to 40% (including costs to sell).
For mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties, a current assessment of value is
made not later than 180 days past the contractual due date. Any outstanding balance in excess of
the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, is charged-off. For this purpose and for
residential real estate properties, the Corporation requests
Independent Broker Price Opinions of
Value of the subject collateral property at least annually. In the case of the Puerto Rico
mortgage loan portfolio, Independent Broker Price Opinions of Value of the subject collateral
properties are subject downward adjustment (cost to sell) of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mortgage
loan portfolio, downward adjustments range from 0% to 30%, depending on the age of the appraisal and
the location of the property.
The table
that follows presents the approximate amount and percentage of
non-covered impaired loans for which the
Corporation relied on appraisals dated more than one year old for purposes of impairment
requirements at March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans with |
|
|
|
Total Impaired Loans Held-in-portfolio (HIP) |
|
|
Appraisals Over |
|
(In thousands) |
|
# of Loans |
|
|
Outstanding Principal Balance |
|
|
One-Year Old [1] |
|
|
Total commercial |
|
|
393 |
|
|
$460,028 |
|
|
|
32% |
|
Total construction |
|
|
86 |
|
|
217,892 |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Based on outstanding balance of total impaired
loans. |
The Corporation evaluates the
discount factors applied to appraisals due to age or general market conditions comparing these to
the aggregate value trends in commercial and construction properties. The main source of
information is new appraisals received by the Corporation and/or recent sales data. In Puerto Rico,
for commercial and construction appraisals less than one year old, the
Corporation generally uses 90% of the
appraised value for determination of the allowance for loan losses. In the case of commercial
loans, if the appraisal is over one year old, the Corporation
generally uses 75% of the appraised value. In the case of construction loans,
this factor can reach up to 60% of the appraised value. In the Corporations U.S. operations, we
usually use 70% of appraised value. This discount was determined based on a study of OREO, short
sale and loan sale transactions during the past two years, comparing net proceeds received by the
bank relative to most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be
applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the project. Factors
are based on appraisal changes and/or trends in loss severities. Discount rates discussed above
include costs to sell.
119
The percentage of the Corporations impaired construction loans that we relied upon as developed
and as is for the period ended March 31, 2011 is presented in the table
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
As is |
|
|
As developed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
construction |
|
|
Average % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
impaired loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
impaired |
|
|
of |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Count |
|
|
in $ |
|
|
HIP |
|
|
Count |
|
|
in $ |
|
|
loans HIP |
|
|
completion |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
129,769 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
88,123 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
|
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation accounted for $88 million impaired construction loans under
the as developed value. This approach is used since the current plan is that the project will be
completed and it reflects the best strategy to reduce potential losses based on the prospects of
the project. The costs to complete the project and the related increase in debt are considered an
integral part of the individual reserve determination.
Allowance for loan losses for loans Covered loan portfolio
The Corporations allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 includes $9 million related to the
covered loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. This allowance covers
the estimated credit loss exposure related to: (i) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic
310-30, which required an allowance for loan losses of $5 million at quarter end, as one pool
reflected a higher than expected credit deterioration; (ii) acquired loans accounted for under ASC
Subtopic 310-20, which required an allowance for loan losses of $2 million, and (iii) loan advances
on loan commitments assumed by the Corporation as part of the acquisition, which required an
allowance of $2 million. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans
(pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan
losses. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 and new loans originated as result of
loan commitments assumed, the Corporations assessment of the allowance for loan losses is
determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20
(general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for
individually impaired loans. Concurrently, the Corporation recorded an increase in the FDIC loss
share indemnification asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss sharing
agreements.
Geographical and government risk
The Corporation is exposed to geographical and government risk. The Corporations assets and
revenue composition by geographical area and by business segment reporting are presented in Note 30
to the consolidated financial statements. A significant portion of the Corporations financial
activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico. Since 2006, the Puerto Rico economy
has been experiencing recessionary conditions. Based on information published by the Puerto Rico
Planning Board (the Planning Board), the Puerto Rico real gross national product decreased an
estimated 3.6% during fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. The unemployment rate in Puerto Rico remains
high at 16.9%, at March 2011. The Puerto Rico economy continues to be challenged, primarily, by a
housing sector that remains under pressure, contraction in the manufacturing sector and a fiscal
deficit that constrains government spending.
The increase in the price of crude oil during the first three months of 2011 should also have a
negative impact on the economy of Puerto Rico, which has a large dependence on oil for energy use.
The current administration has announced plans to convert oil-fired plants into natural gas and
promote the development of alternative energy sources.
The Puerto Rican economy is still vulnerable, but the government has made progress in addressing
the budget deficit while the banking sector has been substantially recapitalized and consolidated
through FDIC-assisted transactions. The government recently announced a small increase in its
fiscal 2012 budget after an estimated 70% decline in the structural deficit. Fiscal progress led
Standard and Poors to upgrade the general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth in March for the
first time in 28 years.
The administration also recently signed into law several economic and fiscal measures to help
counter the prolonged recession.
The implementation of a temporary excise tax on certain manufacturers is expected to add nearly $1
billion annual to consumers purchasing power. The marginal corporate tax rate in Puerto Rico was
also reduced from 39% to 30%. The tax reductions are being funded by the temporary excise tax
referred to above.
The government also enacted a housing-incentive law that puts into effect temporary measures,
effective from September 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, that seek to stimulate demand for housing
and reduce the significant excess supply of new homes. The incentives include reductions in taxes
and government closing fees, tax exemption on rental income from new properties for 10 years,
exemption on long-term capital gain tax in future sale of new properties and no property taxes for
five years on new housing, among others.
120
At
March 2011, the incentives continue to attract home buyers into
the market, especially in the more reasonably priced segment. However, the
high-end market is still under pressure due to excess supply.
Several major projects are under consideration by the Puerto Rico Government in areas such as
energy and road infrastructure. These are to be structured as public and private partnerships and
are expected to generate economic activity as they are awarded and construction commences. There
are also various hotel projects under development.
The current state of the economy and
uncertainty in the private and public sectors has resulted in, among other things, a downturn in
the Corporations loan originations; deterioration in the credit quality of the Corporations loan
portfolios as reflected in high levels of non-performing assets, loan loss provisions and
charge-offs, particularly in the Corporations construction and commercial loan portfolios; an
increase in the rate of foreclosures on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the value of the
Corporations loans and loan servicing portfolio, all of which have adversely affected its
profitability. The persistent economic slowdown could cause those adverse effects to continue, as
delinquency rates may increase in the short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a
potential reduction in consumer spending may also impact growth in the Corporations other interest
and non-interest revenues.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had $1.4 billion of credit facilities granted to or guaranteed
by the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, of which $215 million were
uncommitted lines of credit. Of these total credit facilities granted, $1.1 billion were
outstanding at March 31, 2011. A substantial portion of the Corporations credit exposure to the
Government of Puerto Rico is either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source
of income or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of senior
and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services
or products, such as water and electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees
of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from
it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most
cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been
pledged to their repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes
in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and
loans. Another portion of these loans consists of special obligations of various municipalities
that are payable from the basic real and personal property taxes collected within such
municipalities.
Furthermore, at March 31, 2011, the Corporation had outstanding $143 million in obligations of
Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions as part of its investment securities portfolio.
Refer to Notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Of that
total, $139 million was exposed to the creditworthiness of the Puerto Rico Government and its
municipalities.
As further detailed in Notes 7 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial
portion of the Corporations investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in
the form of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well
as mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by GNMA. In addition, $622 million of residential
mortgages and $263 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or
its agencies at March 31, 2011.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial
commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal
course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to
future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding
agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum
quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined
as purchase obligations.
Purchase obligations include major legal and binding contractual obligations outstanding at March
31, 2011, primarily for services, equipment and real estate construction projects. Services include
software licensing and maintenance, facilities maintenance, supplies purchasing, and other goods or
services used in the operation of the business. Generally, these contracts are renewable or
cancelable at least annually, although in some cases the Corporation has committed to contracts
that may extend for several years to secure favorable pricing concessions.
As previously indicated, the Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is
required either to receive or pay cash, depending on changes in interest rates. These contracts are
carried at fair value on the consolidated statements of condition with the fair value representing
the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of
interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as
interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin
calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions.
The aggregate contractual cash obligations, including purchase obligations and borrowings, by
maturities, have not changed significantly from December 31, 2010. Refer to Note 16 for a breakdown
of long-term borrowings by maturity.
121
The Corporation utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of business to
accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporations exposure to credit losses in
the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to
extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the
contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit procedures and
policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in extending loans to
customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual
amounts are not representative of the Corporations actual future credit exposure or liquidity
requirements for these commitments.
The following table presents the contractual amounts related to the Corporations off-balance sheet
lending and other activities at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table - Off-Balance Sheet Lending and Other Activities |
|
|
Amount of Commitment - Expiration Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 and |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2015 |
|
thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Commitments to
extend credit |
|
$ |
5,859 |
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
6,710 |
|
Commercial letters
of credit |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Standby letters of
credit |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Commitments to originate
mortgage loans |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Unfunded investment obligations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,020 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
6,906 |
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $17 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit, including $4 million of the unamortized balance of the contingent liability on unfunded
loan commitments recorded with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The estimated reserve is
principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the
application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance for
loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded exposures remains separate and distinct from the
allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated
statement of condition.
Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on credit
commitments and contingencies.
Guarantees associated with loans sold / serviced
At March 31, 2011, the Corporation serviced $3.8 billion in residential mortgage loans subject to
credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage
loan securitization programs, compared with $4.0 billion at December 31, 2010. In the event of any
customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to
repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum
potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the
recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total
outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if
applicable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation repurchased approximately $63
million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions. In
the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying
collateral securing the mortgage loan. In the case of Puerto Rico, most claims are settled by
repurchases of delinquent loans, the majority of which are greater than 90 days past due. The
Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property
underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan
plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporations liability established to cover the estimated credit loss
exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $55 million, compared
with $54 million at December 31, 2010.
The following table presents the changes in the Corporations liability of estimated losses from
these credit recourses agreements, included in the consolidated statements of condition for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
53,729 |
|
|
$ |
15,584 |
|
Provision for recourse liability |
|
|
9,765 |
|
|
|
15,701 |
|
Net charge-offs / terminations |
|
|
(8,176 |
) |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
55,318 |
|
|
$ |
29,041 |
|
|
122
The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a
liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in
the line item adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold in the consolidated
statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant
information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a
function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include
actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the
probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse
liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss,
which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of
default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in
good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression
analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics,
including credit scores, loan-to-value rates and loan aging, among others.
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged
for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may
sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not
meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or
indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures
are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met.
The Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated statements
of condition for these customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to
mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the
Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and
insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At March 31, 2011, the
Corporation serviced $18.0 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit
recourse, compared with $18.4 billion at December 31, 2010. The Corporation generally recovers
funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds
when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and
VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost
of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear
the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a
defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure
proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that
loan. At March 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such
mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $28 million, compared with $24 million at
December 31, 2010. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporations servicing
portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate
additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur
additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.
At
March 31, 2011, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related
to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Loans had been sold to investors on a
servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the
Corporation made certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. At March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, the Corporations reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty
arrangements amounted to $31 million. E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the
subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008.
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected losses associated to
E-LOANs customary representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis incorporates expectations
on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole events. The analysis also
considers factors such as the average length of time between the loans funding date and the loan
repurchase date, as observed in the historical loan data. The liability is estimated as follows:
(1) three year average of disbursement amounts (two year historical and one year projected) are
used to calculate an average quarterly amount; (2) the quarterly average is annualized and
multiplied by the repurchase distance, which currently averages approximately three years, to
determine a liability amount; and (3) the calculated reserve is compared to current claims and
disbursements to evaluate adequacy. The Corporations success rate in clearing the claims in full
or negotiating lesser payouts has been fairly consistent. On average, the Corporation avoided
paying on 50% during the 24-month period ended March 31, 2011 (52% during the 24-month period ended
December 31, 2010). On the remaining 50%, the Corporation either repurchased the balance in full or
negotiated settlements. For
123
the accounts where the Corporation settled, it averaged paying 63% of
the claim amount during the 24-month period ended March
31, 2011 (62% during the 24-month period ended December 31, 2010). In total, during the 24-month
period ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation paid an average of 36% of claimed amounts (24-month
period ended December 31, 2010 34%).
In the case of E-LOAN, the Corporation indemnifies the lender, repurchases the loan, or settles the
claim, generally for less than the full amount. Each repurchase case is different and each lender /
servicer has different requirements. The large majority of the loans repurchased have been greater
than 90 days past due at the time of repurchase and are included in our non-performing loans.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, charge-offs recorded by E-LOAN against this representation
and warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases, indemnification or make-whole events and
settlement / closure of certain agreements with counterparties to reduce the exposure to future
claims were minimal. Make-whole events are typically defaulted cases in which the investor attempts
to recover by collateral or guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or
unrecovered portion of the loan. Historically, claims have been predominantly for first mortgage
agency loans and principally consist of underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or missing
documentation. The table that follows presents the changes in the Corporations liability for
estimated losses associated with customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by
E-LOAN, included in the consolidated statement of condition for the quarters ended March 31, 2011
and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
30,659 |
|
|
$ |
33,294 |
|
Provision for representation and warranties |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
Net charge-offs / terminations |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(2,590 |
) |
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
30,688 |
|
|
$ |
31,937 |
|
|
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain
representations or warranties in connection with certain sales of assets by the discontinued
operations of PFH. The sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. At March 31, 2011, the agreements
primarily include indemnification for breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some
of which expire within a definite time period; others survive until the expiration of the
applicable statute of limitations, and others do not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are
subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The
indemnification agreements outstanding at March 31, 2011 are related principally to make-whole
arrangements. At March 31, 2011, the Corporations reserve related to PFHs indemnity arrangements
amounted to $4 million, compared with $8 million at December 31, 2010, and is included as other
liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition. The reserve balance at March 31, 2011
contemplates historical indemnity payments. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America
have agreed to guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification
obligations. The following table presents the changes in the Corporations liability for estimated
losses associated to loans sold by the discontinued operations of PFH, included in the consolidated
statement of condition for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,058 |
|
|
$ |
9,405 |
|
Provision for representation and warranties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
Net charge-offs / terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
Other settlements paid |
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period |
|
$ |
4,261 |
|
|
$ |
9,626 |
|
|
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.7 billion
at March 31, 2011 and $0.6 billion at December 31, 2010. In addition, at March 31, 2011, December
31, 2010 and March 31, 2010, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $1.4
billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust
entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business as described in the Legal Proceedings section in Part II. Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and
Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. At this early stage, it is not possible for
management to assess the probability of an adverse outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of
any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable,
may be material to our results of operations.
124
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
The financial results and capital levels of Popular, Inc. are constantly exposed to market risk.
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or prices, which
include interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices; the failure to meet financial
obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and
the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices
because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
While the Corporation is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate
risk and liquidity are major risks that can materially impact future results of operations and
financial condition due to their complexity and dynamic nature.
The Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible
for planning and executing the Corporations market, interest rate risk, funding activities and
strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Corporations Risk
Management Committee. In addition, a Market Risk Manager, who is part of the Risk Management Group,
has been appointed to enhance and strengthen controls surrounding interest, liquidity, and market
risks, and independently monitor and report adherence with established market and liquidity
policies. The ALCO meets on a monthly basis and reviews various interest rate risk sensitivities,
ratios and portfolio information, including but not limited to, the Corporations liquidity
positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic
conditions.
Interest rate risk (IRR), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a
predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. The
techniques for measuring the potential impact of the Corporations exposure to market risk from
changing interest rates that were described in the 2010 Annual Report are the same as those applied
by the Corporation at March 31, 2011.
Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a
tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting
from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation
model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or
costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its
composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and
maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process,
emphasizing future performance under diverse economic conditions.
Management assesses interest rate risk using various interest rate scenarios that differ in
magnitude and direction, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For
example, the types of interest rate scenarios processed include most likely economic scenarios,
flat or unchanged rates, yield curve twists, +/- 200 and + 400 basis points parallel ramps and +/-
200 basis points parallel shocks. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis
and prepayment risk exposures. The asset and liability management group also evaluates the
reasonableness of assumptions used and results obtained in the monthly sensitivity analyses. Due to
the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate
third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the Corporations deposits and interest
rate scenarios.
The Corporation runs net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the
yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios
considered in these market risk disclosures reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis
points during the twelve-month period ending March 31, 2012. Under a 200 basis points rising rate
scenario, projected net interest income increases by $37.5 million, while under a 400 basis points
rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $66.2 million, when compared
against the Corporations flat or unchanged interest rates forecast scenario. Given the fact that
at March 31, 2011 some market interest rates continued to be close to zero, management has focused
on measuring the risk on net interest income in rising rate scenarios. These interest rate
simulations exclude the impact on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, whose yields are
based on managements current expectation of future cash flows.
Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest
rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. They should not be relied upon as
indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management
could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking
computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.
The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity (EVE) to changes in
interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporations assets minus the
estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure
long-term IRR because it captures the impact of up or down rate changes in expected cash flows,
including principal and interest, from all future periods.
125
EVE sensitivity calculated using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis.
The shock scenarios consist of +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management has defined limits
for the increases / decreases in EVE sensitivity resulting from the shock scenarios.
The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the
use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income
or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives
is subject to interest rate fluctuations and counterparty credit risk adjustments which could have
a positive or negative effect in the Corporations earnings.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets,
available-for-sale securities, derivatives, mortgage servicing rights, and the equity appreciation
instrument. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a
nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are
collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically
result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual
assets.
The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level
hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation
methodology used for fair value measurement are observable.
Refer to Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations fair
value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. At March 31, 2011,
approximately $6.4 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used
market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore, were
classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value were
classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed
securities (MBS) and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), and derivative instruments.
At March 31, 2011, the remaining 3% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were
classified as Level 3 since their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs.
The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities
and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). Additionally, the Corporation reported $29 million of
financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2011, all of
which were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the
market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants.
Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $51 million at March 31,
2011, of which $34 million were Level 3 assets and $17 million were Level 2 assets. These assets
consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these
securities was based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative
local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing was non-binding local broker quotes
obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities were classified as Level 3.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, there were no transfers in and/or out of Level 3 for
financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Also, there were no transfers in
and / or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. Refer to Note 22 to
the consolidated financial statements for a description of the Corporations valuation
methodologies used for the assets and liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2011. Also,
refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates in the 2010 Annual Report for additional
information on the accounting guidance and the Corporations policies or procedures related to fair
value measurements.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities
available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing services and are validated with alternate
pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented
and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporations financial statements.
Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and
investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and
the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers
or broker dealers.
Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the
relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the
pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument,
such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is
not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with
brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on
similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the
126
evaluated instrument.
If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it
discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, none of the
Corporations investment securities were subject to
pricing discontinuance by the pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of
our primary pricing service providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement
guidance.
Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least
on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses
that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of
the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit
ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees.
Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics
and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for
each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation
includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and
level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.
At March 31, 2011, the Corporations portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale amounted to $6.3 billion and represented 96% of the Corporations assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At March 31, 2011, net unrealized gains on the trading
and available-for-sale investment securities portfolios approximated $42 million and $165 million,
respectively. Fair values for most of the Corporations trading and investment securities
available-for-sale were classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale
classified as Level 3, which were the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment,
represented less than 1% of the Corporations total portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), which amounted to $168 million at March 31, 2011, do not trade
in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon
discounted net cash flows calculated from a combination of loan level data and market assumptions.
The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows
(e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash
flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service,
escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations.
Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan
portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporations loan characteristics and portfolio
behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have been historically lower. Other assumptions are,
in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key
economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a
sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Derivatives
Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options, are traded in
over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate
benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on
present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and
have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of
these derivatives held by the Corporation were classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative
assets and liabilities reflect the values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance
risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporations own credit risk, is
determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the
collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation.
The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed models which incorporate the
creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral
received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of
default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation employs procedures for credit
approvals and credit limits, monitors the counterparties credit condition, enters into master
netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2011, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives
resulted in a net gain of $1.8 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense
captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a gain of $0.2 million
resulting from the Corporations own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $1.6 million from the
assessment of the counterparties credit risk.
Equity appreciation instrument
The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC was estimated by
determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal
variables in determining the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument include the implied
volatility determined based on the historical daily volatility of the Corporations common stock,
the exercise price of the instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk-free rate. The
equity appreciation instrument is classified as Level 2. The
127
Corporation recognized non-interest
income of $7.7 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as a result of a decrease in the
fair value of the equity appreciation instrument. The carrying amount of the equity appreciation
instrument, which is recorded as other liability in the consolidated statement of condition,
amounted to $0.6 million as of March 31, 2011.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar
locations, size and supply and demand. Continued deterioration of the housing markets and the
economy in general have adversely impacted and continue to affect the market activity related to
real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are
reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.
LIQUIDITY
The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient
liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a
reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. An
institutions liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it
experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes
counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. An institution is also exposed to liquidity
risk if the markets on which it depends are subject to occasional disruptions.
Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal
markets and regulatory changes, could affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for
the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing
under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are
temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms such as the
pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in
place with the FHLB and the Fed, in addition to maintaining unpledged U.S. Government securities
available for pledging in the repo markets. The Corporation has a significant amount of assets
available for raising funds through these channels.
Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking
and non-banking subsidiaries. Also, it is managed at the level of the banking and non-banking
subsidiaries. The Corporation has adopted policies and limits to monitor more effectively the
Corporations liquidity position and that of the banking subsidiaries. Additionally, contingency
funding plans are used to model various stress events of different magnitudes and affecting
different time horizons that assist management in evaluating the size of the liquidity buffers
needed if those stress events occur. However, such models may not predict accurately how the market
and customers might react to every event, and are dependent on many assumptions.
Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits,
continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 70% of the
Corporations total assets at March 31, 2011, compared with 69% at December 31, 2010.
In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. At March 31,
2011, these borrowings consisted primarily of the note issued to the FDIC as part of the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, securities sold under agreement to repurchase, junior
subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and advances with the FHLB.
128
The composition of the Corporations financing to total assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010 is included in Table N.
TABLE N
Financing to Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from December 31,
2010 to |
|
|
% of total assets |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 to |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
4,913 |
|
|
$ |
4,939 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Interest-bearing core deposits |
|
|
15,946 |
|
|
|
15,637 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
6,338 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
|
3,801 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
A detailed description of the Corporations borrowings, including its terms, is included in
Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporations cash
inflows and outflows.
In the past two years, the Corporation took steps to deleverage its balance sheet and prepay
certain high cost debt to benefit its cost of funds going forward. These actions were possible in
part due to the excess liquidity derived from the Corporations 2010 capital raise, paydowns from
the loan portfolio coupled with weak loan demand, from maturities of investment securities and
funds received from the sale of the majority interest in EVERTEC. During 2011, the Corporations
liquidity position remains strong. Certain actions were taken by the Corporation during the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 to improve the Corporations net interest margin and deploy some excess
liquidity at its banking subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Prepaid $224 million of the note issued to the FDIC as part of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction during the first quarter of 2011 with proceeds from maturities of
securities. This note carries a 2.50% annual rate. The Corporation expects to paydown the
note by the end of 2011 due to its high interest cost. |
|
|
|
|
Repaid $100 million of medium-term notes that carried a 13% cost and had a contractual
maturity of March 2012. Penalties on the early repayment amounted to $8 million. |
|
|
|
|
Received cash inflows on the sale of $457 million (legal balance) in non-conventional
mortgage loans at the BPNA reportable segment. |
|
|
|
|
Purchased $753 million in securities by the BPNA reportable segment, primarily U.S.
Agencies securities and U.S. Government agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations,
during the first quarter of 2011 to deploy excess liquidity. Funds were invested in
longer-term securities to improve the net interest margin. These securities can be pledged
to other counterparties in the repo market and continue to serve as a source to manage the
Corporations liquidity needs. |
Banking Subsidiaries
Primary sources of funding for the Corporations banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or the
banking subsidiaries, include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, collateralized
borrowings, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the
Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the Discount Window of the Fed, and
have a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under
these facilities.
The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment
portfolio purchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational
expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting
requirements for some derivative transactions and recourse obligations; off-balance sheet
activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments; recourse provisions; servicing
advances; derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds
administered by BPPR.
The bank operating subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in
funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available
liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form
of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in
addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that
require the banking subsidiaries to
129
have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings
and a portion of deposits. In addition, the total loan portfolio is funded with deposits with the
exception of the Westernbank acquisition which is partially funded with the note issued to the
FDIC.
The Corporations ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding
brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and
financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized
credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the
credit ratings of the Corporation may impact its ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or
the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact
should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporations banking subsidiaries are federally insured
(subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the effect of a downgrade in the credit
ratings.
Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings
and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table I for a breakdown of
deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and
institutional customers. For purposes of defining core deposits, the Corporation excludes brokered
deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have historically provided the
Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. Core deposits totaled
$20.9 billion, or 77% of total deposits, at March 31, 2011, compared with $20.6 billion, or 77% of
total deposits, at December 31, 2010. Core deposits financed 62% of the Corporations earning
assets at March 31, 2011, compared to 61% at December 31, 2010.
Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over at March 31, 2011 totaled $4.6
billion, or 17% of total deposits, compared with $4.7 billion, or 17%, at December 31, 2010. Their
distribution by maturity at March 31, 2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |
3 months or less |
|
$ |
1,862,698 |
|
3 to 6 months |
|
|
848,311 |
|
6 to 12 months |
|
|
905,796 |
|
Over 12 months |
|
|
997,529 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,614,334 |
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 6% of the Corporations assets were
financed by brokered deposits. The Corporation had $2.5 billion in brokered deposits at March 31,
2011, compared with $2.3 billion at December 31, 2010. Brokered certificates of deposit, which are
typically sold through an intermediary to retail investors, provide access to longer-term funds and
provide the ability to raise additional funds without pressuring retail deposit pricing in the
Corporations local markets. An unforeseen disruption in the brokered deposits market, stemming
from factors such as legal, regulatory or financial risks, could adversely affect the Corporations
ability to fund a portion of the Corporations operations and/or meet its obligations.
In the event that any of the Corporations banking subsidiaries fall under the regulatory capital
ratios of a well-capitalized institution or are subject to capital restrictions by the regulators,
that banking subsidiary faces the risk of not being able to raise or maintain brokered deposits and
faces limitations on the rate paid on deposits, which may hinder the Corporations ability to
effectively compete in its retail markets and could affect its deposit raising efforts.
To the extent that the banking subsidiaries are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core
deposits, the Corporation may meet its liquidity needs through short-term borrowings by pledging
securities for borrowings under repurchase agreements, by pledging additional loans and securities
through the available secured lending facilities, or by selling liquid assets. These measures are
subject to availability of collateral.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. At March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB
aggregating $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with the FHLB at
those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $0.8 billion at March 31,
2011 and $0.7 billion at December 31, 2010. Such advances are collateralized by loans
held-in-portfolio, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable features. Refer
to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the terms of FHLB
advances outstanding.
At March 31, 2011, the banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Feds Discount Window
of approximately $2.8 billion, compared with $2.7 billion at December 31, 2010, which remained
unused as of both dates. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable
even under difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is
dependent upon the balance of performing loans and securities pledged as collateral and the
haircuts assigned to such collateral.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the BHCs did not make any capital contributions to BPNA
and BPPR.
130
At March 31, 2011, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and
projected liquidity sources to meet its anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs
and off-balance sheet commitments, during the foreseeable future and have sufficient liquidity
resources to address a stress event.
Although the banking subsidiaries have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and
advances if desired, no assurance can be given that they would be able to replace those funds in
the future if the Corporations financial condition or general market conditions were to change.
The Corporations financial flexibility will be severely constrained if its banking subsidiaries
are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate
future growth at acceptable interest rates. Finally, if management is required to rely more heavily
on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, revenues may not increase
proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.
Bank Holding Companies
The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment
securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory
limits), asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds
from new borrowings or stock issuances. The principal source of cash flows for the parent holding
company during 2010 was a capital issuance and proceeds from the sale of the 51% ownership interest
in EVERTEC. The principal use of these funds include capitalizing its banking subsidiaries, the
repayment of debt, and interest payments to holders of senior debt and junior subordinated
deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities). The Corporation is not
paying dividends to holders of its common stock. At the end of 2010, the Corporation resumed paying
dividends on its Series A and B preferred stock. The preferred stock dividends amounted to $930
thousand for the first quarter of 2011. The Corporations ability to declare and pay dividends on
the preferred stock is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including guidelines
of the Federal Reserve Board regarding capital and dividends.
The Corporations bank holding companies (BHCs, Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Inc. and
Popular International Bank, Inc.) have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the
corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries. These sources of funding
have become more costly due to the reductions in the Corporations credit ratings together with
higher credit spreads in general. The Corporations principal credit ratings are below investment
grade which affects the Corporations ability to raise funds in the capital markets. However, the
cash needs of the Corporations non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness and
interest are now minimal. The Corporation has an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement
filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity
securities.
A principal use of liquidity at the BHCs is to ensure its subsidiaries are adequately capitalized.
Operating losses at the BPNA banking subsidiary required the BHCs to contribute equity capital
during 2009 and 2010 to ensure that it continued to meet the regulatory guidelines for
well-capitalized institutions. There were no capital contributions made to BPNA during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011. Management does not expect either of the banking subsidiaries to
require additional capitalizations for the foreseeable future. Other principal uses of liquidity
are the payment of principal and interest on debt securities and dividends on preferred stock.
Refer to Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements, which provides a statement of condition,
of operations and of cash flows for the three BHCs. The loans held-in-portfolio in such financial
statements are principally associated with intercompany transactions. The investment securities
held-to-maturity at the parent holding company, amounting to $210 million at March 31, 2011,
consisted principally of $185 million of subordinated notes from BPPR.
The outstanding balance of notes payable at the BHCs amounted to $1.2 billion at March 31, 2011,
compared with $1.3 billion at December 31, 2010. These borrowings are principally junior
subordinated debentures (related to trust preferred securities), including those issued to the U.S.
Treasury as part of the TARP, and unsecured senior debt (term notes). The reduction in notes
payable at the BHCs from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 was due to the prepayment of the $100
million in medium-term notes. The repayment of the BHCs obligations represents a potential cash
need which is expected to be met with internal liquidity resources and new borrowings.
The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and
other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the
foreseeable future.
Risks to Liquidity
Total lines of credit outstanding are not necessarily a measure of the total credit available on a
continuing basis. Some of these lines could be subject to collateral requirements, standards of
creditworthiness, leverage ratios and other regulatory requirements, among other factors.
Derivatives, such as those embedded in long-term repurchase transactions or interest rate swaps,
and off-balance sheet exposures, such as recourse, are subject to collateral requirements. As their
fair value increases, the collateral requirements may increase, thereby reducing the balance of
unpledged securities.
131
Reductions of the Corporations credit ratings by the rating agencies could also affect its ability
to borrow funds, and could substantially raise the cost of our borrowings. Some of the
Corporations borrowings have rating triggers that call for an increase in their interest rate in
the event of a rating downgrade. In addition, changes in the Corporations ratings could lead
creditors and business counterparties to raise the collateral requirements, which could reduce
available unpledged securities, reducing excess liquidity. Refer to Part II Other Information,
Item 1A-Risk Factors of the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for
additional information on factors that could impact liquidity.
The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that
could affect its financing activities. In the case of a further decay or deepening of the economic
recession in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be further affected and
result in higher credit costs. Even though the U.S. economy appears to be in the initial stages of
a recovery, it is not certain that the Puerto Rico economy will benefit materially from a rebound
in the U.S. cycle. The Puerto Rico economy faces various challenges including the persistent government
deficit and a residential real estate sector under substantial pressures.
Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal
markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to
prepare for the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising
financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available
are temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms, such as the
pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in
place with the FHLB and the Fed.
Credit ratings of Populars debt obligations are an important factor for liquidity because they
impact the Corporations ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding
sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in
the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of
management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core
retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporations ability to access a broad array of wholesale
funding sources, among other factors. At March 31, 2011, the Corporations senior unsecured debt
ratings continued to be non-investment grade with the three major rating agencies. This may make
it more difficult for the Corporation to borrow in the capital markets and at a higher cost. The
Corporations counterparties are sensitive to the risk of a rating downgrade. In addition, the
ability of the Corporation to raise new funds or renew maturing debt may be more difficult. Some of
the Corporations or its subsidiaries counterparty contracts include close-out provisions if the
credit ratings fall below certain levels.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have historically not used unsecured capital market
borrowings to finance its operations, and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in
the Corporations overall credit ratings. Their main funding sources are currently deposits and
secured borrowings, and in the case of BPNA, capital contributions from its parent company. At the
BHCs, the volume of capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the non-banking
lending businesses that it had historically funded have been shut down and outstanding unsecured
senior debt has been reduced.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major
rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured
borrowings. The banking subsidiaries did have $18 million in deposits at March 31, 2011 that are
subject to rating triggers. At March 31, 2011, the Corporation had repurchase agreements amounting
to $232 million that were subject to rating triggers or the maintenance of well-capitalized
regulatory capital ratios, and were collateralized with securities with a fair value of $249
million.
Some of the Corporations derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the banks
well-capitalized status and credit ratings. These agreements could require exposure
collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a
liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $57 million at March 31, 2011, with
the Corporation providing collateral totaling $74 million to cover the net liability position with
counterparties on these derivative instruments.
In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties
include rating covenants. Based on BPPRs failure to maintain the required credit ratings, the
third parties could have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian
for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as
discussed in the Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments section of this MD&A, the
Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain
contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse
obligations if the institutions required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by
the Corporation to secure recourse obligations approximated $155 million at March 31, 2011. The
Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management
expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The
requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could
reduce the Corporations liquidity resources and impact its operating results.
132
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporations management, with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
quarter ended on March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The nature of Populars business ordinarily results in a certain number of claims, litigation,
investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings. When the Corporation determines
it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Corporation
will consider the settlement of cases (including cases where it has meritorious defenses) when, in
managements judgment, it is in the best interests of both the Corporation and its shareholders to
do so.
On at least a quarterly basis, Popular assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection
with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it
is probable that the Corporation will incur a loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the
Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted on at
least a quarterly basis as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a
loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.
In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is
reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes an estimate of the aggregate range of
reasonably possible losses for those matters where a range may be determined, in excess of amounts
accrued, for current legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $30.0 million at March 31, 2011.
For certain other cases, management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any
estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the
fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants
in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the
numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various
potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, managements estimate will change from
time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.
While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information
currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, management believes that
the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the
Corporations legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations
consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future
developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be
material to the Corporations consolidated financial position in a particular period.
Between May 14, 2009 and September 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc., and certain of its directors and
officers, among others. The five class actions were consolidated into two separate actions: a
securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero v.
Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action entitled
In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v. Popular,
Inc., et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
included as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock, among
others. The consolidated action purported to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities
between January 24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleged that the defendants violated Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading. The
consolidated action also alleged that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint sought class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular, the underwriter
defendants and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action
complaint. On August 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the
motion to dismiss filed by the underwriter defendants on statute of limitations grounds. The Court
also dismissed the Section 11 claim brought against Populars directors on statute of limitations
grounds and the Section 12(a)(2) claim brought against Popular because plaintiffs lacked standing.
The Court declined to dismiss the claims brought against Popular and certain of its officers under
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder), Section 20(a) of the
Exchange Act, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, holding that plaintiffs had adequately
alleged that defendants made materially false and misleading statements with the requisite state of
mind.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated complaint purported to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc.
U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment
Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409
and 502(a)(2) of ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom was alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleged that defendants
breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to eliminate Popular
stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint sought to recover alleged losses to
the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive trust, along with
costs and
133
attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a scheduling order issued
by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to the amended complaint.
Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants filed a motion to
dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the alternative, for judgment on the
pleadings. On
May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation in which he recommended that the
motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he
recommended that the motion be granted. On May 19, 2010, Popular filed objections to the magistrate
judges report and recommendation. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order without
opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss and providing that the Court
would issue an opinion and order explaining its decision. No opinion was, however, issued prior to
the settlement in principle discussed below.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) were brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints sought a
judgment that the action was a proper derivative action, an award of damages, restitution, costs
and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009,
the Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities
class action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the
García complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating
litigation. On November 20, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on December 21, 2009,
Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García amended complaint. At a
scheduling conference held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in both the Hoff and
García matters pending resolution of their respective motions to dismiss. On August 11, 2010, the
Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss the García action. The Court
dismissed the gross mismanagement and corporate waste claims, but declined to dismiss the breach of
fiduciary duty claim. The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan,
was removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009,
Popular and the individual defendants moved to consolidate the García and Díaz actions. On October
26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance and to
stay defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand proceedings. On September
30, 2010, the Court issued an order without opinion remanding the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance. On October 13, 2010, the Court issued a Statement of Reasons In Support
of Remand Order. On October 28, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved for
reconsideration of the remand order. The court denied Populars request for reconsideration
shortly thereafter.
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under Puerto
Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, plaintiff in that action moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On May 4, 2010, the Court denied plaintiffs request for
reconsideration. On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed an appeal before the Puerto Rico Court of
Appeals. On June 11, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the appeal. On
June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. On July 6, 2010, plaintiff moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On July 16, 2010, the Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs
request for reconsideration.
At the Courts request, the parties to the Hoff and García cases discussed the prospect of
mediation and agreed to nonbinding mediation in an attempt to determine whether the cases could be
settled. On January 18 and 19, 2011, the parties to the Hoff and García cases engaged in
nonbinding mediation before the Honorable Nicholas Politan. As a result of the mediation, the
Corporation and the other named defendants to the Hoff matter entered into a memorandum of
understanding to settle this matter. Under the terms of the memorandum of understanding, subject to
certain customary conditions including court approval of a final settlement agreement in
consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants, the amount of $37.5 million
will be paid by or on behalf of defendants (of which management expects approximately $30 million
will be covered by insurance). The parties intend to file a stipulation of settlement and a joint
motion for preliminary approval within the next few weeks. The Corporation recognized a charge, net
of the amount expected to be covered by insurance, of $7.5 million in December 2010 to cover the
uninsured portion of the settlement.
In addition, the Corporation is aware that a suit asserting similar claims on behalf of certain
individual shareholders under the federal securities laws was filed on January 18, 2011.
A separate memorandum of understanding was subsequently entered by the parties to the García and
Diaz actions in April 2011. Under the terms of this memorandum of understanding, subject to certain
customary conditions, including court approval of a final settlement agreement, and in
consideration for the full and final settlement and release of all defendants, Popular has agreed,
for a period of three years, to maintain or implement certain corporate governance practices,
measures and policies, as set forth in the memorandum of understanding. Aside from the payment by
or on behalf of Popular of approximately $2.1 million of attorneys fees and expenses of counsel
for the plaintiffs (of which management expects $1.6 million will be covered by insurance), the settlement does not require any cash payments by or on behalf of Popular or
the defendants. The parties intend to file a joint request to approve the settlement within the
next few weeks.
134
Prior to the Hoff and derivative action mediation, the parties to the ERISA class action entered
into a separate memorandum of understanding to settle that action. Under the terms of the ERISA
memorandum of understanding, subject to certain customary conditions including court approval of a
final settlement agreement and in consideration for the full settlement and release of all
defendants, the amount of $8.2 million will be paid by or on behalf of the defendants (all of which
management expects will be covered by insurance). The parties filed a joint request to approve the
settlement on April 13, 2011. On April 29, 2011, the court entered an order scheduling a hearing
for May 27, 2011, regarding preliminary approval of the proposed settlement in the ERISA class
action.
Popular does not expect to record any material gain or loss as a result of the settlements. Popular
has made no admission of liability in connection with these settlements.
At this point, the settlement agreements are not final and are subject to a number of future
events, including approval of the settlements by the relevant courts. There can be no assurances
that the settlements will be finalized or as to the timing of the payments described above.
In
addition to the foregoing, Banco Popular is a defendent in two
lawsuits arising from its consumer banking and trust-related
activities. On October 7, 2010, a putative class action for breach of contract and damages captioned
Almeyda-Santiago v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First
Instance against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The complaint essentially asserts that plaintiff has
suffered damages because of Banco Populars allegedly fraudulent overdraft fee practices in
connection with debit card transactions. Such practices allegedly consist of: (a) the
reorganization of electronic debit transactions in high-to-low order so as to multiply the number
of overdraft fees assessed on its customers; (b) the assessment of overdraft fees even when clients
have not overdrawn their accounts; (c) the failure to disclose, or to adequately disclose, its
overdraft policy to its customers; and (d) the provision of false and fraudulent information
regarding its clients account balances at point of sale transactions and on its website. Plaintiff
seeks damages, restitution and provisional remedies against Banco Popular for breach of contract,
abuse of trust, illegal conversion and unjust enrichment. On January 13, 2011, Banco Popular
submitted a motion to dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiffs opposition thereto is due on May 31, 2011.
On December 13, 2010, Popular was served with a class action complaint captioned García Lamadrid,
et al. v. Banco Popular, et al. which was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. The
complaint generally seeks damages against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, other defendants and their
respective insurance companies for their alleged breach of certain fiduciary duties, breach of
contract, and alleged violations of local tort law. Plaintiffs seek in excess of $600 million in
damages, plus costs and attorneys fees.
More specifically, plaintiffs Guillermo García Lamadrid and Benito del Cueto Figueras are suing
Defendant BPPR for the losses they (and others) experienced through their investment in the RG
Financial Corporation-backed Conservation Trust Fund securities. Plaintiffs essentially claim that
Banco Popular allegedly breached its fiduciary duties to them by failing to keep all relevant
parties informed of any developments that could affect the Conservation Trust notes or that could
become an event of default under the relevant trust agreements; and that in so doing, it acted
imprudently, unreasonably and grossly negligently. Popular submitted a motion to dismiss on
February 28, 2011. Plaintiffs submitted an opposition thereto on April 15, 2011.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed under Part I Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2010 Annual Report. These factors
could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of
operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this
report. Also refer to the discussion in Part I Item 2 -Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report for additional information that may
supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in our 2010 Annual Report.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of the
Corporations 2010 Annual Report.
The risks described in our 2010 Annual Report and in this report are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
135
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the
Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted under this Plan is
10,000,000.
The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
be Purchased Under |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
the Plans or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs [a] |
|
January 1 January 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,743,767 |
|
February 1 February 28 |
|
696,154 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
696,154 |
|
|
6,047,613 |
|
March 1 March 31 |
|
211,246 |
|
|
$ |
3.09 |
|
|
211,246 |
|
|
5,838,367 |
|
|
Total March 31, 2011 |
|
907,400 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
907,400 |
|
|
5,838,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Includes shares forfeited. |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
12.1
|
|
Computation of the Ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
136
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POPULAR, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Jorge A. Junquera
|
|
|
|
Jorge A. Junquera |
|
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo
|
|
|
|
Ileana González Quevedo |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller |
|
|
137