e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
Commission File Number: 001-34084
POPULAR, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
66-0667416 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
Popular Center Building |
|
|
209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey |
|
|
San Juan, Puerto Rico |
|
00918 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(787) 765-9800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer, large accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: Common Stock $0.01 par value, 1,022,682,796 shares outstanding as of
November 2, 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
The information included in this Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements
may relate to Popular, Inc.s (the Corporation) financial condition, results of operations,
plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with
respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, market risk and the impact of interest
rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, and the effect of legal
proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporations financial condition and results of
operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are
forward-looking, and the words anticipate, believe, continues, expect, estimate,
intend, project and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as will,
would, should, could, might, can, may, or similar expressions are generally intended to
identify forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties,
estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.
Various factors, some of which are beyond Populars control, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that
might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities, including in connection
with our acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Westernbank
Puerto Rico from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); |
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; |
|
|
|
|
the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels
of capital; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial
Reform Act) on the Corporations businesses, business practices and costs of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of
the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are
located; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of the stock and bond markets; |
|
|
|
|
competition in the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
additional FDIC assessments; and |
|
|
|
|
possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. |
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 as well as Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of such factors and
certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation is subject.
Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in Part II, Item I. Legal Proceedings,
is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of
regulators, judges and juries.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based upon information available to
the Corporation as of the date of this document, and other than as required by law, including the
requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
580,811 |
|
|
$ |
677,330 |
|
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,807 |
|
|
|
140,635 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
290,456 |
|
|
|
293,125 |
|
|
|
325,178 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
1,733,493 |
|
|
|
549,865 |
|
|
|
633,010 |
|
|
Total money market investments |
|
|
2,023,949 |
|
|
|
1,002,797 |
|
|
|
1,098,823 |
|
|
Trading account securities, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
434,637 |
|
|
|
415,653 |
|
|
|
386,478 |
|
Other trading securities |
|
|
48,555 |
|
|
|
46,783 |
|
|
|
59,890 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities with creditors right to repledge |
|
|
2,048,258 |
|
|
|
2,330,441 |
|
|
|
2,432,720 |
|
Other investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3,693,225 |
|
|
|
4,364,273 |
|
|
|
4,560,571 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value as of September 30,
2010 $214,803; December 31, 2009 $213,146;
September 30, 2009
$210,913) |
|
|
214,152 |
|
|
|
212,962 |
|
|
|
212,950 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value as of
September 30, 2010 $159,622; December 31, 2009 $165,497; September 30, 2009
$176,286) |
|
|
158,309 |
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
|
|
174,943 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
115,088 |
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
22,249,167 |
|
|
|
23,827,263 |
|
|
|
24,512,966 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
106,685 |
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
|
|
116,897 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,243,994 |
|
|
|
1,261,204 |
|
|
|
1,207,401 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
24,904,715 |
|
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
|
23,188,668 |
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
3,308,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
531,849 |
|
|
|
584,853 |
|
|
|
589,592 |
|
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
168,823 |
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
|
|
129,485 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
77,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
160,167 |
|
|
|
126,080 |
|
|
|
131,745 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
165,947 |
|
|
|
169,747 |
|
|
|
180,335 |
|
Other assets (See Note 13) |
|
|
1,459,985 |
|
|
|
1,324,917 |
|
|
|
1,156,721 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
665,333 |
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
606,508 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
60,438 |
|
|
|
43,803 |
|
|
|
46,067 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
5,371,439 |
|
|
$ |
4,495,301 |
|
|
$ |
4,281,817 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
22,368,605 |
|
|
|
21,429,593 |
|
|
|
22,101,081 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
27,740,044 |
|
|
|
25,924,894 |
|
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,358,139 |
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
191,342 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
5,143,388 |
|
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
|
|
2,649,821 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,278,603 |
|
|
|
983,866 |
|
|
|
1,051,661 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
36,711,516 |
|
|
|
32,197,508 |
|
|
|
32,895,348 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 (aggregate liquidation
preference
$50,160) |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,700,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2010
(December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 700,000,000); 1,022,878,228 shares
issued as of September 30, 2010 (December 31,2009 and
September 30, 2009 639,544,895)
and 1,022,686,418 outstanding as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
639,540,105; September 30, 2009 639,541,515) |
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
4,094,302 |
|
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
2,794,660 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(130,808 |
) |
|
|
(292,752 |
) |
|
|
(69,525 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 191,810 shares as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
4,790 shares; September 30, 2009 3,380) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax expense of $16,856 (December
31, 2009
$33,964; September 30, 2009 $57,302) |
|
|
85,862 |
|
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
4,109,200 |
|
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
INTEREST INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
484,883 |
|
|
$ |
371,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,224,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,155,378 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
7,024 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
57,277 |
|
|
|
74,360 |
|
|
|
185,118 |
|
|
|
223,661 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
20,313 |
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
550,687 |
|
|
|
454,463 |
|
|
|
1,434,603 |
|
|
|
1,414,701 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
86,330 |
|
|
|
118,941 |
|
|
|
269,919 |
|
|
|
395,432 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
14,945 |
|
|
|
16,142 |
|
|
|
45,756 |
|
|
|
53,476 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
62,494 |
|
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
|
184,117 |
|
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
163,769 |
|
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
|
499,792 |
|
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
386,918 |
|
|
|
276,389 |
|
|
|
934,811 |
|
|
|
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
171,905 |
|
|
|
(54,674 |
) |
|
|
277,340 |
|
|
|
(221,101 |
) |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
48,608 |
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
|
|
149,865 |
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
Other service fees (See Note 24) |
|
|
100,822 |
|
|
|
97,614 |
|
|
|
305,867 |
|
|
|
298,584 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
220,792 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and
valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
(23,106 |
) |
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
(36,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
10,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of processing and technology business |
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
24,568 |
|
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
|
63,076 |
|
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
796,524 |
|
|
|
160,044 |
|
|
|
1,170,248 |
|
|
|
720,614 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
116,426 |
|
|
|
102,822 |
|
|
|
321,423 |
|
|
|
315,224 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
78,746 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
141,205 |
|
|
|
130,547 |
|
|
|
400,169 |
|
|
|
412,044 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,425 |
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
86,359 |
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
25,432 |
|
|
|
24,983 |
|
|
|
74,231 |
|
|
|
76,289 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
13,872 |
|
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
38,635 |
|
|
|
39,369 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
48,224 |
|
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
109,498 |
|
|
|
80,643 |
|
Communications |
|
|
9,514 |
|
|
|
11,902 |
|
|
|
31,628 |
|
|
|
36,115 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
11,260 |
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
29,759 |
|
|
|
26,761 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
7,898 |
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
17,183 |
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
49,894 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
25,448 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
45,697 |
|
|
|
31,753 |
|
|
|
119,464 |
|
|
|
104,955 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
371,547 |
|
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
|
980,876 |
|
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax |
|
|
596,882 |
|
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
|
|
466,712 |
|
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
494,494 |
|
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
353,611 |
|
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
161,944 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE BASIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
POPULAR
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
|
|
|
including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
treasury stock |
|
Preferred stock |
|
Surplus |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
(loss) income |
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December
31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,566,277 |
|
|
$ |
1,483,525 |
|
|
$ |
621,879 |
|
|
|
($374,488 |
) |
|
|
($28,829 |
) |
|
$ |
3,268,364 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360,692 |
) |
Accretion of discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,515 |
[3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515) |
[3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of preferred
stock for trust preferred
securities issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(901,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(415,885 |
) |
Issuance of common stock
in exchange of preferred
stock |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
(536,715 |
) |
|
|
291,974 |
|
|
|
230,388 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,636 |
) |
Issuance of common stock
in connection with early
extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,652 |
|
Issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
[2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Stock options expense on
unexercised options, net
of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Change in par value |
|
|
(1,689,389) |
[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689,389 |
[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,641 |
) |
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
Common stock reissuance |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378 |
|
Common stock purchases |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
125,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
Balance as of September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,384 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,794,660 |
|
|
|
($69,525 |
) |
|
|
($39,223 |
) |
|
$ |
2,742,456 |
|
|
Balance as of December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,380 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
2,804,238 |
|
|
|
($292,752 |
) |
|
|
($29,209 |
) |
|
$ |
2,538,817 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,611 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,000 |
[5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock
upon conversion of
preferred stock |
|
|
3,834 |
[5] |
|
|
(1,150,000) |
[5] |
|
|
1,337,833 |
[5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,667 |
|
Issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,769) |
[6] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,769 |
) |
Deemed dividend on
preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
Common stock purchases |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(530 |
) |
Other comprehensive
income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,071 |
|
|
|
115,071 |
|
|
Balance as of September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2010 |
|
$ |
9,684 |
|
|
$ |
50,160 |
|
|
$ |
4,094,302 |
|
|
|
($130,808 |
) |
|
$ |
85,862 |
|
|
$ |
4,109,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excess of carrying amount of preferred stock exchanged over fair value of new trust preferred securities and common stock issued |
|
[2] |
|
Net of issuance costs of preferred stock exchanged and issuance costs related to exchange and issuance of new common stock |
|
[3] |
|
Accretion of preferred stock discount 2008 Series C preferred stock |
|
[4] |
|
Change in par value from $6.00 to $0.01 (not in thousands) |
|
[5] |
|
Issuance and subsequent conversion of depositary shares representing interests in shares of contingent convertible non-cumulative preferred stock Series D into common stock |
|
[6] |
|
Issuance costs related to issuance and conversion of depositary shares (Preferred stock Series D) |
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Disclosure of changes in number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period (January 1) |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
|
|
24,410,000 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
1,150,000 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,403,609 |
) [2] |
|
|
(22,403,609 |
) [2] |
Conversion of stocks |
|
|
(1,150,000 |
) [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
|
2,006,391 |
|
|
Common Stock Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
|
|
295,632,080 |
|
Issuance of stocks |
|
|
383,333,333 |
[1] |
|
|
357,510,076 |
[3] |
|
|
357,510,076 |
[3] |
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
|
(13,597,261 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
1,022,878,228 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
|
639,544,895 |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
(191,810 |
) |
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
Common Stock Outstanding |
|
|
1,022,686,418 |
|
|
|
639,540,105 |
|
|
|
639,541,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Issuance of 46,000,000 in depositary shares; converted into 383,333,333 common shares
(full conversion of depositary shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in shares of
contingent convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock, into common stock). |
|
[2] |
|
Exchange of 21,468,609 preferred stock Series A and B for common shares, and exchange of
935,000 preferred stock Series C for trust preferred securities. |
|
[3] |
|
Shares issued in exchange of Series A and B preferred stock and early extinguishment of debt
(exchange of trust preferred securities for common stock). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(2,117 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
7,945 |
|
|
|
66,223 |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
7,438 |
|
|
|
82,934 |
|
|
|
124,350 |
|
|
|
63,535 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(3,717 |
) |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
(3,701 |
) |
|
|
(173,868 |
) |
Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
(2,163 |
) |
|
|
(2,618 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
87,432 |
|
|
|
132,179 |
|
|
|
(42,925 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
(9,955 |
) |
|
|
(17,108 |
) |
|
|
32,531 |
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
11,412 |
|
|
|
77,477 |
|
|
|
115,071 |
|
|
|
(10,394 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
$ |
505,906 |
|
|
|
($47,511 |
) |
|
$ |
468,682 |
|
|
|
($371,086 |
) |
|
Tax Effects Allocated to Each Component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
($882 |
) |
|
|
($1,272 |
) |
|
|
($2,647 |
) |
|
|
($24,055 |
) |
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale arising during the period |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(9,137 |
) |
|
|
(15,724 |
) |
|
|
(5,844 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
62,790 |
|
Unrealized net losses on cash flows hedges |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income (loss) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
($888 |
) |
|
|
($9,955 |
) |
|
|
($17,108 |
) |
|
$ |
32,531 |
|
|
Disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
($35,269 |
) |
|
|
($40,676 |
) |
|
|
($41,185 |
) |
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans |
|
|
(119,841 |
) |
|
|
(127,786 |
) |
|
|
(193,986 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
45,919 |
|
|
|
48,566 |
|
|
|
75,586 |
|
|
Underfunding of pension and postretirement benefit plans, net of tax |
|
|
(73,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,220 |
) |
|
|
(118,400 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale |
|
|
224,739 |
|
|
|
104,090 |
|
|
|
139,641 |
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(29,306 |
) |
|
|
(14,134 |
) |
|
|
(18,672 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains on securities available-for-sale, net of tax |
|
|
195,433 |
|
|
|
89,956 |
|
|
|
120,969 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flows hedges |
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
388 |
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flows hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
(607 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
85,862 |
|
|
|
($29,209 |
) |
|
|
($39,223 |
) |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
8
POPULAR, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
47,084 |
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Fair value adjustments of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
19,959 |
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of premiums and deferred fees |
|
|
(150,577 |
) |
|
|
50,613 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
(220,792 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
(35,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains from changes in fair value related to instruments measured at fair value pursuant
to the fair value option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
Net (gain)
loss on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
|
1,696 |
|
Net loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Gain on sale
of processing and technology business, net of transaction costs |
|
|
(616,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Earnings from investments under the equity method |
|
|
(16,144 |
) |
|
|
(14,307 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
(76,444 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(494,312 |
) |
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(213,897 |
) |
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
57,831 |
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
565,611 |
|
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
Net decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
24,935 |
|
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
26,935 |
|
Net decrease in interest payable |
|
|
(34,559 |
) |
|
|
(57,763 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Net increase in other liabilities |
|
|
95,902 |
|
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(41,396 |
) |
|
|
1,058,616 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
312,215 |
|
|
|
697,924 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in money market investments |
|
|
(924,913 |
) |
|
|
(304,169 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(688,678 |
) |
|
|
(4,105,915 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(52,198 |
) |
|
|
(54,562 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(44,021 |
) |
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
1,329,390 |
|
|
|
1,261,801 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
51,067 |
|
|
|
136,535 |
|
Other |
|
|
108,470 |
|
|
|
62,480 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
396,676 |
|
|
|
3,825,502 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
1,292,935 |
|
|
|
666,618 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
15,908 |
|
|
|
325,414 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
(130,488 |
) |
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
Cash received from acquisitions |
|
|
261,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of processing and technology businesses |
|
|
642,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(40,336 |
) |
|
|
(55,625 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
13,503 |
|
|
|
36,105 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
120,412 |
|
|
|
107,720 |
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
2,350,762 |
|
|
|
1,878,603 |
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(574,739 |
) |
|
|
(1,167,108 |
) |
Net decrease in assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(274,651 |
) |
|
|
(743,717 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
184,016 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
(3,281,449 |
) |
|
|
(807,002 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
111,101 |
|
|
|
61,100 |
|
Prepayment penalties paid on cancellation of debt |
|
|
(25,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of depositary shares |
|
|
1,102,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of preferred stock and trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,618 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,759,496 |
) |
|
|
(2,754,653 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and due from banks |
|
|
(96,519 |
) |
|
|
(178,126 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
580,811 |
|
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
|
Note: The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
includes the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with
discontinued operations.
9
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1
|
|
|
|
Nature of Operations |
Note 2
|
|
|
|
Business Combination |
Note 3
|
|
|
|
Sale of Processing and Technology Business |
Note 4
|
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Note 5
|
|
|
|
Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards |
Note 6
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
Note 7
|
|
|
|
Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities |
Note 8
|
|
|
|
Pledged Assets |
Note 9
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities Available-For-Sale |
Note 10
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity |
Note 11
|
|
|
|
Loans Held-in-Portfolio and Allowance for Loan Losses |
Note 12
|
|
|
|
Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights |
Note 13
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
Note 14
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Note 15
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
Note 16
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
Note 17
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities |
Note 18
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
Note 19
|
|
|
|
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
Note 20
|
|
|
|
Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities |
Note 21
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement |
Note 22
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Note 23
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Common Share |
Note 24
|
|
|
|
Other Service Fees |
Note 25
|
|
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefits |
Note 26
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
Note 27
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
Note 28
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
Note 29
|
|
|
|
Segment Reporting |
Note 30
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events |
Note 31
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities |
10
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Nature of Operations
Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding
company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin
America. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through
its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and
equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance
services through specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco
Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community
bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA
operates branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit
accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The sections that follow provide a description of
two significant transactions that impacted the Corporations operations during 2010.
Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction
On April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) to acquire certain assets and assume certain deposits and
liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico state-chartered bank headquartered in
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (Westernbank)(herein the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction).
Westernbank was a wholly-owned commercial bank subsidiary of W Holding Company, Inc. and operated
through a network of 44 branches located throughout Puerto Rico. In August 2010, Popular
successfully completed the Westernbanks systems and branch conversions. All retail and commercial
accounts were converted to Populars applications. Furthermore, out of the estimated 1,440
full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) that Westernbank had at the time of acquisition, the
Corporation has hired to date close to 816 FTEs. The Corporation retained a limited number of the
branches, some of which were consolidated with other existing branches of BPPR. Refer to Note 2 to
the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Refer to the Corporations Form 8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010 for additional
information with respect to this FDIC-assisted transaction.
EVERTEC
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, including
the Corporations merchant acquiring and processing and technology businesses (the EVERTEC
transaction), and continues to hold the remaining 49% interest in the company. Refer to Note 3 to
the consolidated financial statements for a description of the EVERTEC transaction. EVERTEC
provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, and continues
to provide processing and technology services to many of Populars subsidiaries.
Note 2 Business Combination
As indicated in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on April 30, 2010, the
Corporations banking subsidiary, BPPR, acquired certain assets and assumed certain deposits of
Westernbank Puerto Rico from the FDIC, as receiver for Westernbank, in an assisted transaction.
BPPR acquired approximately $9.1 billion in assets and assumed approximately $2.4 billion in
deposits, excluding the effects of purchase accounting adjustments. As part of the transaction, on
April 30, 2010, BPPR issued a five-year $5.8 billion note payable to the FDIC bearing an annual
interest rate of 2.50%. The note is secured by a substantial amount of the assets, including loans
and foreclosed other real estate properties acquired by BPPR from the FDIC in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction, and which are subject to the loss sharing agreements. In addition, as
part of the consideration for the transaction, the FDIC received a cash-settled equity appreciation
instrument, which is described in detail below.
Loss Sharing Agreements
In connection with the acquisition, BPPR entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC with
respect to approximately $8.6 billion of loans and other real estate (the covered assets)
acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing
agreements, the FDICs obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets
begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC will reimburse BPPR
11
for 80% of losses with
respect to covered assets, and BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with
respect to losses for which the FDIC paid BPPR 80% reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements.
The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC
loss and recoveries sharing for ten years. The loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and
consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for
eight years, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.
In addition, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days
following the last day (the True-Up Measurement Date) of the final shared loss month, or upon the
final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on
the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up
payment is recorded as a reduction in the fair value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR shall pay to the FDIC, 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i)
20% of the Intrinsic Loss Estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million)(as determined by the FDIC)
less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of
the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or
payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C)
the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve-month period prior to and
ending on the True-Up Measurement Date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during
which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as
the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss
assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).
Covered loans under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (the covered loans) are reported in
loans exclusive of the estimated FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The covered loans acquired
in the Westernbank transaction are, and will continue to be, reviewed for collectability. Under ASC
Subtopic 310-30, if there is a decrease in the expected cash flows on loans due to an increase in
estimated credit losses compared to the estimate made at the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, the
Corporation will record a charge to the provision for loan losses and an allowance for loan losses
will be established. If there is an increase in inherent losses on the loans accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-20, an allowance for loan losses will be established to record the loans at their
net realizable value. A related credit to income and an increase in the FDIC loss share
indemnification asset will be recognized at the same time, measured based on the loss share
percentages described above, for ASC Subtopic 310-20 and 310-30 loans.
The operating results of the Corporation for the quarter and nine months ended September 30,
2010 include the operating results produced by the acquired assets and liabilities assumed for
the period of May 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010. The Corporation believes that given the nature
of assets and liabilities assumed, the significant amount of fair value adjustments, the nature
of additional consideration provided to the FDIC (note payable and equity appreciation
instrument) and the FDIC loss sharing agreements now in place, historical results of Westernbank
are not meaningful to Populars results, and thus no pro forma information is presented.
12
The following table presents balances recorded by the Corporation at the time of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction on April 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As recorded by |
|
|
accounting |
|
Fair value |
|
Additional |
|
Popular, Inc. on |
(In thousands) |
|
adjustments |
|
adjustments |
|
consideration |
|
April 30, 2010 |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
58,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,610 |
|
Covered loans |
|
|
8,503,839 |
|
|
|
($4,286,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216,992 |
|
Non-covered loans |
|
|
50,905 |
|
|
|
(6,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,996 |
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
Covered other real estate owned |
|
|
125,947 |
|
|
|
(52,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,235 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
Receivable from FDIC (associated to the note
issued to the FDIC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
|
111,101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,142,359 |
|
|
|
($999,492 |
) |
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
$ |
8,253,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,380,170 |
|
|
$ |
11,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,391,635 |
|
Note issued to the FDIC (including a premium
of $11,612 resulting from the fair value
adjustment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,769,696 |
|
|
|
5,769,696 |
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
2,394,095 |
|
|
$ |
143,907 |
|
|
$ |
5,822,196 |
|
|
$ |
8,360,198 |
|
|
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
6,748,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1,143,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate additional consideration, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,711,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
As previously disclosed, the fair values initially assigned to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed were preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing
date of the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available.
Because of the size of the transaction and delays in the receipt of certain information, the
Corporation continues to analyze its estimates of fair value on loans acquired, FDIC loss share
indemnification asset recorded and the note issued to the FDIC. As the Corporation finalizes its
analyses of these assets and liabilities, there may be adjustments to the recorded carrying values,
and thus the recognized goodwill may increase or decrease.
The following is a description of the methods used to determine the fair values of significant
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction:
Loans
Fair values for loans were based on a discounted cash flow methodology. Certain loans were valued
individually, while other loans were valued as pools. Aggregation into pools considered
characteristics such as loan type, payment term, rate type and accruing status. Principal and
interest projections considered prepayment rates and credit loss expectations. The discount rates
were developed based on the relative risk of the cash flows, taking into account principally the
loan type, market rates as of the valuation date, liquidity expectations, and the expected life of
the loans.
FDIC loss share indemnification asset
Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on
the expected reimbursements for losses, including consideration of the true up payment and the
applicable loss sharing percentages. These expected reimbursements do not include reimbursable
amounts related to future covered expenditures. The estimates of expected losses used in valuation
of this asset are consistent with the loss estimates used in the valuation of the covered assets.
These cash flows were discounted to reflect the estimated timing of the receipt of the loss share
reimbursement from the FDIC and the value of any true-up payment due to the FDIC at the end of the
loss sharing agreements, to the extent applicable. The discount rate used in this calculation was
13
determined using a yield of an A-rated corporate security with a term based on the weighted average life of the recovery of cash
flows plus a risk premium reflecting the uncertainty related to the timing of cash flows and the
potential rejection of claims by the FDIC. Due to the increased uncertainty of the true-up payment,
an additional risk premium was added to the discount rate.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation has not made any claims to the FDIC associated with
losses incurred on covered loans or covered other real estate owned.
Receivable from the FDIC
The note issued to the FDIC as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date was determined based on a
pro-forma statement of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of February 24, 2010, the bid
transaction date. The receivable from the FDIC represents an adjustment to reconcile the
consideration paid based on the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 30, 2010
compared with the pro-forma statement as of February 24, 2010. The carrying amount of this
receivable was a reasonable estimate of fair value based on its short-term nature. The receivable
from the FDIC was collected by BPPR in June 2010 and is reflected as a cash inflow from financing
activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The proceeds were remitted to the FDIC in July 2010 as a payment on the note.
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC (OREO)
OREO includes real estate acquired in settlement of loans. OREO properties were recorded at
estimated fair values less costs to sell at the date acquired based on managements assessments of
existing appraisals or broker price opinions. The estimated costs to sell are based on past
experience with similar property types and terms customary for real estate transactions.
Goodwill
The amount of goodwill is the residual difference in the fair value of liabilities assumed and net
consideration paid to the FDIC over the fair value of the assets acquired. The goodwill is
deductible for income tax purposes. The goodwill from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction was
assigned to the BPPR reportable segment.
Core deposit intangible
This intangible asset represents the value of the relationships that Westernbank had with its
deposit customers. The fair value of this intangible asset was estimated based on a discounted cash
flow methodology that gave appropriate consideration to expected customer attrition rates, cost of
the core deposit base, interest costs, and the net maintenance cost attributable to customer
deposits, and the cost of alternative funds.
Deposits
The fair values used for the demand and savings deposits that comprise the transaction accounts
acquired, by definition equal the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values
for time deposits were estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest
rates currently offered to comparable time deposits with similar maturities.
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments
Unfunded loan commitments are contractual obligations to provide future funding. The fair value of
a liability associated to unfunded loan commitments is principally based on the expected
utilization rate or likelihood that the commitment will be exercised. The estimated value of the
unfunded commitments was equal to the expected loss associated with the balance expected to be
funded. The expected loss is comprised of both credit and non-credit components; therefore, the
discounts derived from the loan valuation were applied to the expected balance to be funded to
derive the fair value. The unfunded loan commitments outstanding as of the April 30, 2010
transaction date, which approximated $227 million, relate principally to commercial and
construction loans and commercial revolving lines of credit. Losses incurred on loan disbursements
made under these unfunded loan commitments are covered by the FDIC loss sharing agreements provided
that the Corporation complies with specific requirements under such agreements. The contingent
liability on unfunded loan commitments is included as part of other liabilities in the
consolidated statement of condition.
14
Deferred taxes
Deferred taxes relate to a difference between the financial statement and tax basis of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction. Deferred taxes are reported based upon the
principles in ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes, and are measured using the enacted statutory income tax
rate to be in effect for BPPR at the time the deferred tax is expected to reverse, which is 39%.
For income tax purposes, the Westernbank transaction was accounted for as an asset purchase and the
tax bases of assets acquired were allocated based on fair values using a modified residual method.
Under this method, the purchase price was allocated among the assets in order of liquidity (the
most liquid first) up to its fair market value.
Note issued to the FDIC
The fair value of the note issued to the FDIC was determined using discounted cash flows based on
market rates currently available for debt with similar terms, including consideration that the debt
is collateralized by the assets covered under the loss sharing agreements. The principal source of
cash flows to pay down the note derives from the cash flows collected from the covered assets, as
well as payments from the FDIC on claimed credit losses associated to the covered assets. The
Corporation is required under the agreements with the FDIC to use those proceeds to repay the note
and remit payments on a monthly basis.
Equity appreciation instrument
As part of the consideration for the acquisition of Westernbank assets, BPPR also issued an equity
appreciation instrument to the FDIC. Under the terms of the equity appreciation instrument, the
FDIC has the opportunity to obtain a cash payment with a value equal to the product of (a) 50
million units and (b) the difference between (i) Popular, Inc.s average volume weighted price
over the two NASDAQ trading days immediately prior to the exercise date and (ii) the exercise price
of $3.43. The equity appreciation instrument is exercisable by the holder thereof, in whole or in
part, up to May 7, 2011. The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated by
determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The equity
appreciation instrument is recorded as a liability and any subsequent changes in its estimated fair
value will be recognized in earnings. The Corporation recognized non-interest income of $10.6
million and $35.0 million during the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010,
respectively, as a result of a decrease in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument.
These amounts are separately disclosed in the consolidated statement of operations within the
non-interest income category.
Note 3 Sale of Processing and Technology Business
On June 30, 2010, Popular and its subsidiaries BPPR, Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI) and
EVERTEC completed an internal reorganization transferring certain intellectual property assets and
interests in certain of the Corporations foreign subsidiaries to EVERTEC. Commencing on June 30,
2010, PIBIs wholly-owned subsidiaries ATH Costa Rica S.A. and T.I.I. Smart Solutions Inc. became
wholly-owned subsidiaries of EVERTEC. Also, in connection with the reorganization, BPPRs Merchant
Business and TicketPop divisions were transferred to EVERTEC. On September 30, 2010, EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA,
C.A. became a subsidiary of PIBI and EVERTEC LATINOAMERICA, SOCIEDAD
ANONIMA was transferred from PIBI to EVERTEC.
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a majority interest in its processing
and technology business EVERTEC, including the businesses transferred in the internal
reorganization discussed above. The Corporation retained EVERTECs
operations in Venezuela and certain related contracts. Under the terms of the sale, an unrelated third party acquired a
51% interest in EVERTEC for cash under a leverage buyout. The Corporation retained the remaining
49% interest. The Corporations investment in EVERTEC, which is
accounted for under the equity method,
amounted to $177 million as of September 30, 2010, and is included as part of other assets in the
consolidated statement of condition. The Corporations proportionate share of income or loss from
EVERTEC will be included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations
commencing on October 1, 2010.
As a result of the sale, the Corporation recognized a pre-tax gain, net of transaction costs, of
approximately $616.2 million ($531.0 million after-tax), of which $640.8 million was separately
disclosed within non-interest income in the consolidated statement of operations and $24.6 million
are included as operating expenses (transaction costs) for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Approximately $94.0 million of the pre-tax gain was the result of marking the
Corporations retained interest in the EVERTEC business at fair
value. This portion of the gain was non-cash.
The equity value of the Corporations retained interest in the former subsidiary takes into consideration the
buyers enterprise value of EVERTEC reduced by the leverage financing, net of debt issue costs, utilized as part of
the sale transaction. This leverage financing significantly impacts the resulting fair value of the retained interest.
15
In connection with the leverage transaction, EVERTEC issued financing in the form of unsecured
senior notes and a syndicated loan (senior secured credit facility). The Corporation invested $35
million in senior unsecured notes issued by EVERTEC ($17.85 million, net of the intercompany
elimination related to the 49% ownership interest maintained by Popular), which bear interest at an
annual fixed rate of 11% and mature in October 2018. Also, the Corporation provided financing to
EVERTEC by acquiring $58.2 million of the syndicated loan ($29.7 million, net of intercompany
eliminations).
Also, as part of the sale, Popular entered into various agreements including a master services
agreement pursuant to which EVERTEC will continue providing various processing and information
technology services to Popular, BPPR, and their respective subsidiaries. These service costs will
be included prospectively in operating expenses on the Corporations consolidated statements of
operations, net of elimination entries that are required due to Popular holding a 49% ownership
interest in EVERTEC. Also, as part of the agreement, BPPR commits to support the ATH debit cards as
well as the ATH network, owned and operated by EVERTEC.
The equity investments in the processing businesses of Servicios Financieros, S.A. de C.V.
(Serfinsa) and Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) continued to be held by the
Corporation as of September 30, 2010. Under the terms of the merger agreement, the Corporation is
required for a period of twelve months following the merger to continue to seek to sell its equity
interests in such entities to EVERTEC, subject to complying with certain rights of first refusal in
favor of the Serfinsa and CONTADO shareholders. The
Corporations investments in Serfinsa and Contado, accounted
for under the equity method, amounted to $1.3 million and $15.9
million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010.
Note 4 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. The
statement of condition data as of December 31, 2009 was derived from audited financial statements.
The unaudited interim financial statements are, in the opinion of management, a fair statement of
the results for the periods reported and include all necessary adjustments, all of a normal
recurring nature, for a fair statement of such results.
Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted from the unaudited financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the year
ended December 31, 2009, included in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March
1, 2010 (the 2009 Annual Report). Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the
accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. Operating results
for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for a full year or any future period.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the consolidated statement of condition.
Management exercised significant judgment regarding assumptions about discount rates, future
expected cash flows including prepayments, default rates, market conditions and other future events
that are highly subjective in nature, and subject to change, and all of which affected the
estimation of the fair values of the net assets acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Actual results could differ from those estimates; others provided with the same
information could draw different reasonable conclusions and calculate different fair values.
Changes that may vary significantly from our assumptions include loan prepayments, credit losses,
the estimated market values of collateral at disposition, the timing of such disposition, and
deposit attrition.
Reclassifications
Servicing rights related to commercial loans (Small Business Administration), which are accounted for under the
amortization method, have been reclassified to other assets in all periods presented, while mortgage servicing rights, which are accounted for at fair value, are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
Amounts reported in prior periods consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported cash flows, shareholders equity or net income.
16
Business Acquisition
The Corporation determined that the acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain
liabilities of Westernbank in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction constitutes a business
acquisition as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Codification (ASC)
Topic 805 Business Combinations. The assets and liabilities, both tangible and intangible, were
initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair values were determined based on the
requirements of FASB Codification Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements. These fair value estimates
are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the
acquisition as additional information regarding the closing date fair value becomes available.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
Loans acquired in an FDIC-assisted transaction
Loans acquired in a business acquisition are recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date.
Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan
losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.
Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 represent loans showing evidence of credit
deterioration and that it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Corporation will not
collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Generally, acquired loans that
meet the definition for nonaccrual status fall within the Corporations definition of impaired
loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30. Also, based on the fair value determined for the acquired
portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the definition of nonaccrual status also resulted in
the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality. Accordingly, an election
was made by the Corporation to apply the accretable yield method (expected cash flow model of ASC
Subtopic 310-30), as a loan with credit deterioration and impairment, instead of the standard loan
discount accretion guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20. These loans are disclosed as a loan that was
acquired with credit deterioration and impairment.
The
Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to all loans acquired in the transaction
(including loans that do not meet scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30), except for credit cards and revolving lines
of credit that were expressly scoped out from the application of this guidance since they continued
to have revolving privileges after acquisition. Management used its judgment in evaluating factors
impacting expected cash flows and probable loss assumptions, including the quality of the loan
portfolio, portfolio concentrations, distressed economic conditions in Puerto Rico, quality of
underwriting standards of the acquired institution, reductions in collateral real estate values,
among other considerations that could also impact the expected cash inflows on the loans.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the covered loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools
based on loans that had common risk characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single
asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.
Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction included loan type,
interest rate type, accruing status, and amortization type. Once the pools are defined, the
Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at
acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the accretable yield, is recognized as interest
income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and
amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference
represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows
expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those
expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in
expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan
losses.
The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for
pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20 represents the difference between the contractually
required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan. This discount is
accreted into interest income over the life of the loan if the loan is in accruing status. Any cash
flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in earnings at the time
of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving privileges, which are
accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to periodic review to
determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses.
Covered Assets
17
Assets subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC are labeled covered on the consolidated
statement of condition and include certain loans and other real estate properties. Loans acquired
in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for credit cards, are considered covered
loans because the Corporation will be reimbursed for 80% of any future losses on these loans
subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements.
FDIC Loss Share Indemnification Asset
The acquisition date fair value of the reimbursement that the Corporation expects to receive from
the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements was recorded as an FDIC loss share indemnification asset
on the consolidated statement of condition. Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows
related to the loss sharing agreements. Refer to Note 2 for additional information on the valuation
methodology.
The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the
related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable
with the assets should the assets be sold.
The impact of the FDIC loss share indemnification on the Corporations results of operations is
included in non-interest income, particularly in the category of FDIC loss share expense, and considers the accretion due to discounting and the changes in expected loss sharing
reimbursements.
The indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to loss share
protection. As such, for covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in
expected reimbursements will be recognized in income prospectively consistent with the approach
taken to recognize increases in cash flows on covered loans. For covered loans accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount recorded as of the acquisition date is accreted into
income, a reduction of the corresponding indemnification asset is recorded as a reduction in
non-interest income.
Increases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same period that the
allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized.
Equity Appreciation Instrument
The equity appreciation instrument is recorded as an other liability in the consolidated
statement of condition and any subsequent change in its estimated fair value is recognized in
earnings on each quarterly reporting date. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements
for additional information on the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC.
Note 5 Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting
Standards
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16)
ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage
securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial
assets, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and includes additional
disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have
continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most
significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of
financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated
affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial
assets or third-party beneficial interests, and the addition of the meaning of the term
participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in
its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating interests as defined in
ASC paragraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance has been applied as of the beginning of the first annual
reporting period that began after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period and will be applied for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier
application was prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions have been applied to
transfers that have occurred on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date,
18
existing qualifying special-purpose entities have been evaluated for consolidation in accordance with the applicable
consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative
accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The Corporation evaluated transfers of financial
assets executed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 pursuant to the new accounting
guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage securitizations (Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) mortgage-backed
securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16 did not have a significant impact on
the Corporations accounting for such transactions or results of operations or financial condition
for such period.
A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial asset, or a pool of
financial assets in which the Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control
over the transferred assets and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is accounted for as a sale.
Control is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1)
the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the
assets; and (3) the transferor no longer maintains effective control over the assets. When the
Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above criteria, the
Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is
accounted for as a secured borrowing.
The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial
asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset
that meets the requirements for sale accounting; or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing
obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated
subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing
asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction
that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured
borrowing.
Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial
assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17) and
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain
Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10)
ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs) and changes how a
reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled
through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity, if any, has both (a)
a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying which entity has
the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance requires
reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts or circumstances occur such
that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. It also
requires ongoing assessments of whether a variable interest holder is the primary beneficiary of a
VIE. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all entities that were within the scope of
the original guidance, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that were
previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17 requires a reporting entity to provide
additional disclosures about its involvement with VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure
due to that involvement. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance
effective January 1, 2010. The new accounting guidance on VIEs did not have an effect on the
Corporations consolidated statement of condition or results of operations upon adoption.
The principal VIEs evaluated by the Corporation during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which management has
concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 20 to the consolidated
financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management believes that the
Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer to Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements).
19
Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the
attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital
companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810),
Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU
2009-17 for a reporting entitys interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment
company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial
reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral
allows asset managers that have no obligation to fund potentially significant losses of an
investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that
have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the Investment Company Guide). The FASB
also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing
guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure
requirements in ASU 2009-17.
The Corporation was not required to consolidate existing VIEs for which it has a variable interest
as of September 30, 2010. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for required
disclosures associated with the guaranteed mortgage securitizations in which the Corporation holds
a variable interest.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) -
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that
disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about
inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value
measurements. ASU 2010-06 has been effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about fair value measurements are
presented in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception
Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (ASU 2010-11)
ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded
derivative bifurcation requirements. The type of credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption
is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities
that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such
subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The
amendments in ASU 2010-11 are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first
fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard in the third quarter of
2010 did not have a significant impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Effect of a Loan
Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU
2010-18)
The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans subject
to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that
subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides
guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon
acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are
accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans
from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt
restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in
which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30 that
are not accounted for within pools. Loans
20
accounted for individually under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions
within ASC Subtopic 310-40, ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010.
The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early application is permitted. Upon initial
adoption of the guidance in ASU 2010-18, an entity may make a one-time election to terminate
accounting for loans as a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a
pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent
acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration. The Corporation elected to early adopt the
provisions of this statement, effective with the closing of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction on April 30, 2010. As a result, the accounting for modified loans follows the
guidelines of ASU 2010-18; however, the adoption of these provisions did not have a significant
impact on the Corporations result of operations or financial position as of September 30, 2010.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit
Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20)
ASU 2010-20, issued in July 2010, expands disclosure requirements about the credit quality of
financing receivables and allowance for credit losses. The objective of this ASU is for an entity
to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users evaluation of the
following: (1) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entitys portfolio of financing
receivables; (2) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit
losses; and (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses.
Disclosures should be provided on a disaggregated basis on two defined levels: (1) portfolio
segment; and (2) class of financing receivable. The ASU 2010-20 makes changes to existing
disclosure requirements and includes additional disclosure requirements about financing
receivables, including: the credit quality indicators of financing receivables at the end of the
reporting period by class of financing receivables; the aging of past due financing receivables at
the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables; and the nature and extent of
troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the period by class of financing receivables and
their effect on the allowance for credit losses. The disclosure requirements as of the end of a
reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations.
Note 6 Discontinued Operations
In 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (PFH) by
selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The loss from discontinued operations
for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $3.4 million and $20.0 million,
respectively, net of taxes. This loss was primarily related to salary and other expenses incurred
in providing loan portfolio servicing to affiliated companies and other costs for FTEs that were
retained for a transition period, as well as adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans previously
sold.
Note 7 Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities
The Corporations subsidiary banks are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to
maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank or other banks. Those required
average reserve balances were $828 million as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $721
million; September 30, 2009 $705 million). Cash and due from banks as well as other short-term,
highly-liquid securities are used to cover the required average reserve balances.
As required by the Puerto Rico International Banking Center Regulatory Act, as of September 30,
2010, December 31, 2009, and September 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained separately for its two
international banking entities (IBEs), $0.6 million in time deposits, equally divided for the two
IBEs, which were considered restricted assets.
As part of a line of credit facility with a financial institution, as of December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $2 million as collateral for the
line of credit. This restriction expired on July 2010.
21
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $6 million to support
letters of credit (December 31, 2009 $4 million; September 30, 2009 $5 million).
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $2 million that represents
funds deposited in an escrow account which are guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the
title of insured properties.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained restricted cash of $12 million to comply with
the requirements of the credit card networks.
Note 8 Pledged Assets
Certain securities, loans and other real estate owned were pledged principally to secure public
and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit
facilities available, derivative positions, loan servicing agreements and the loss sharing
agreement with the FDIC.
The classification and carrying amount of the Corporations pledged assets, in which the secured
parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
2,102,699 |
|
|
$ |
1,923,338 |
|
|
$ |
2,183,586 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
125,770 |
|
|
|
125,769 |
|
|
|
25,769 |
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
2,636 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
3,966,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
9,646,035 |
|
|
|
8,993,967 |
|
|
|
8,406,876 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC |
|
|
77,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pledged assets |
|
$ |
15,920,885 |
|
|
$ |
11,045,328 |
|
|
$ |
10,618,867 |
|
|
Pledged investment securities and loans in which the creditor has the right by custom or
contract to repledge are presented separately in the consolidated statements of condition.
As of September 30, 2010, investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity totaling
$1.7 billion, and loans of $0.2 billion, served as collateral to secure public funds.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York (FHLB) and from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed). As of September 30,
2010, the banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the
FHLB aggregating $1.7 billion. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for
borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. As of September 30, 2010, the credit
facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $3.7 billion in loans held-in-portfolio.
Also, the Corporations banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of
$2.7 billion, which remained unused as of such date. The amount available under this credit
facility is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. As of
September 30, 2010, the credit facilities with the Fed discount window were collateralized by $5.7
billion in loans held-in-portfolio. These pledged assets are included in the above table and were
not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statement of condition as of September
30, 2010.
Loans held-in-portfolio and other real estate owned that are covered by loss sharing agreements
with the FDIC amounting to $4.0 billion as of September 30, 2010, serve as collateral to secure the
note issued to the FDIC. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for descriptive
information on the note issued to the FDIC.
22
Note 9 Investment Securities Available-For-Sale
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield of
investment securities available-for-sale as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September
30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
6,998 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,164 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
% |
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
28,850 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,259 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
Total U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
35,848 |
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,423 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
288,588 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,568 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,011,751 |
|
|
|
65,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076,754 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,890 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,069 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,328,747 |
|
|
|
68,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,396,960 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
10,140 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,158 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
15,858 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
16,227 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
21,225 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
21,224 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
5,560 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,715 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
52,783 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
53,324 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,020 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
87,668 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,311 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,215,779 |
|
|
|
38,744 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,254,485 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,306,585 |
|
|
|
40,494 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1,347,041 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
13,612 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
13,254 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
85,796 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
82,136 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
99,408 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
95,390 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
18,557 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,276 |
|
|
|
4.02 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
182,930 |
|
|
|
12,349 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
195,277 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,461,567 |
|
|
|
103,118 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
2,564,529 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
2,666,548 |
|
|
|
116,261 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
2,782,651 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,975 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
8,844 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
5,516,744 |
|
|
$ |
229,828 |
|
|
$ |
5,089 |
|
|
$ |
5,741,483 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,359 |
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,452 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
349,424 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,915 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,177,318 |
|
|
|
58,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,469 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,492 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,884 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,060 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,581,438 |
|
|
|
66,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647,936 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
22,311 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
22,303 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,910 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
50,527 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7,779 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
81,061 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
80,609 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
125,397 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
127,098 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,454,833 |
|
|
|
19,060 |
|
|
|
5,837 |
|
|
|
1,468,056 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,585,146 |
|
|
|
21,285 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
1,600,190 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
20,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
20,232 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
105,669 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
97,326 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
126,554 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
117,558 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
26,878 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,390 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
30,117 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,940 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
205,480 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,261 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,915,689 |
|
|
|
32,102 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
2,937,588 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,178,164 |
|
|
|
42,218 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
3,210,179 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8,902 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
7,790 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,590,624 |
|
|
$ |
131,692 |
|
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
$ |
6,694,714 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
$ |
29,528 |
|
|
$ |
1,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,136 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
184,261 |
|
|
|
4,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,437 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,377,705 |
|
|
|
71,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449,395 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
27,812 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,764 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
26,882 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,682 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
|
|
Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,616,660 |
|
|
|
77,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,278 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
12,375 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
12,277 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
50,969 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
48,997 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
27,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
27,704 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
91,254 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
2,573 |
|
|
|
88,983 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
138,044 |
|
|
|
2,578 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
140,214 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,438,743 |
|
|
|
26,787 |
|
|
|
11,623 |
|
|
|
1,453,907 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,580,519 |
|
|
|
29,475 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
1,597,963 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
23,481 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
22,915 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
115,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,988 |
|
|
|
103,775 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
Total collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
139,350 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
126,796 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
9,072 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9,169 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
62,462 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,893 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
178,392 |
|
|
|
9,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,675 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
3,136,807 |
|
|
|
47,982 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
3,184,558 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
3,386,733 |
|
|
|
58,814 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
3,445,295 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9,606 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
6,853,650 |
|
|
$ |
168,002 |
|
|
$ |
28,361 |
|
|
$ |
6,993,291 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
25
The following table shows the Corporations fair value and gross unrealized losses of
investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2010,
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
18,234 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
18,536 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
13,880 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
20,282 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
68,032 |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
69,583 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
8,915 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
10,155 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
3,849 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
42,583 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
79,822 |
|
|
$ |
4,758 |
|
|
$ |
122,405 |
|
|
$ |
5,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
63,429 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
65,816 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
298,917 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
359,214 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
658,131 |
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
97,904 |
|
|
|
9,087 |
|
|
|
104,620 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
905,028 |
|
|
|
10,130 |
|
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
908,594 |
|
|
|
10,203 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
1,215,395 |
|
|
$ |
14,804 |
|
|
$ |
528,011 |
|
|
$ |
12,798 |
|
|
$ |
1,743,406 |
|
|
$ |
27,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
26,299 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
58,123 |
|
|
$ |
2,407 |
|
|
$ |
84,422 |
|
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
137,288 |
|
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
486,652 |
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
|
|
623,940 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
3,935 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
114,635 |
|
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
|
118,570 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
51,648 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
11,949 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
63,597 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
221,919 |
|
|
$ |
5,049 |
|
|
$ |
675,198 |
|
|
$ |
23,312 |
|
|
$ |
897,117 |
|
|
$ |
28,361 |
|
|
26
Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair
value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the
value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for
anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired, the excess of the securitys carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is
accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to
consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the
extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition
of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt
security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a
rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a
geographic area, and (7) managements intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely
than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted
recovery occurs.
As of September 30, 2010, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an
unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual
debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. As of September 30, 2010, the
Corporation does not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it
is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior
to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Also, management evaluated the Corporations portfolio
of equity securities as of September 30, 2010. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the
Corporation did not record any other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities.
Management has the intent and ability to hold the investments in equity securities that are at a
loss position as of September 30, 2010 for a reasonable period of time for a forecasted recovery of
fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of these investments.
The unrealized losses associated with Collateralized mortgage obligations private label are
primarily related to securities backed by residential mortgages. In addition to verifying the
credit ratings for the private-label CMOs, management analyzed the underlying mortgage loan
collateral for these bonds. Various statistics or metrics were reviewed for each private-label CMO,
including among others, the weighted average loan-to-value, FICO score, and delinquency and
foreclosure rates of the underlying assets in the securities. As of September 30, 2010, there were
no sub-prime securities in the Corporations private-label CMOs portfolios. For private-label
CMOs with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2010, credit impairment was assessed using a cash
flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific
collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage
loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the
transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure.
The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows through the current period and then projects the
expected cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, loss severity and
prepayment rates. Managements assessment also considered tests using more stressful parameters.
Based on the assessments, management concluded that the tranches of the private-label CMOs held by
the Corporation were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2010, thus management
expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the securities.
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale during the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $377.2 million and $396.7 million; respectively. Gains
of $3.7 million were realized during the quarter and year-to-date periods ended September 30, 2010
related to the sale during this quarter of investment securities available-for-sale. This compares
with proceeds of $77.9 million and $3.8 billion respectively, and realized net gains of $198
thousand and $184.3 million respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
27
The following table states the names of issuers and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of
the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in
which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders equity. This
information excludes securities of the U.S. Government agencies and corporations. Investments in
obligations issued by a State of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are
payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S.
Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
792,291 |
|
|
$ |
826,042 |
|
|
$ |
970,744 |
|
|
$ |
991,825 |
|
|
$ |
1,067,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,089,443 |
|
FHLB |
|
|
1,173,877 |
|
|
|
1,238,487 |
|
|
|
1,385,535 |
|
|
|
1,449,454 |
|
|
|
1,395,778 |
|
|
|
1,469,493 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
602,440 |
|
|
|
620,384 |
|
|
|
959,316 |
|
|
|
971,556 |
|
|
|
997,716 |
|
|
|
1,012,276 |
|
|
28
Note 10 Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield
of investment securities held-to-maturity as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,812 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,814 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,150 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
110,528 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,148 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,595 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
18,049 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
49,300 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
48,879 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
184,573 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
185,240 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
214,152 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
214,803 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,777 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,781 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,021 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,415 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
112,566 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,112 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
16,699 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
46,048 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
182,142 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
|
|
182,334 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,823 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
212,962 |
|
|
$ |
3,206 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
$ |
213,146 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
25,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,022 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
109,415 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
111,717 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
17,107 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
16,281 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
45,098 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
182,137 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
180,118 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
Total others |
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
212,950 |
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
$ |
210,913 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
The following table shows the Corporations fair value and gross unrealized losses of
investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2010,
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,126 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
31,126 |
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Others |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
31,307 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
31,550 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
37,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
58,905 |
|
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an
unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
21,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,908 |
|
|
$ |
37,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
59,113 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,763 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions |
|
|
42,995 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
$ |
19,493 |
|
|
$ |
437 |
|
|
|
62,488 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized
loss position |
|
$ |
68,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,996 |
|
|
$ |
19,953 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
$ |
88,711 |
|
|
$ |
4,445 |
|
|
30
As indicated in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates
investment securities for other-than-temporary (OTTI) declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis.
The Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions classified as held-to-maturity
as of September 30, 2010 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of
Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. The Corporation performs
periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The decline in fair value as of September 30,
2010 was attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality; thus no
other-than-temporary decline in value was recorded in these held-to-maturity securities. As of
September 30, 2010, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity
and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment
securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.
Note 11 Loans Held-in-Portfolio and Allowance for Loan Losses
Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction acquired loans are significantly different from those loans not covered under the FDIC
loss sharing agreements. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing
agreements as covered loans in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC
loss sharing agreements as non-covered loans.
The composition of loans held-in-portfolio (HIP) as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and
September 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-covered |
|
Covered |
|
Total loans HIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loans as of |
|
loans as of |
|
as of September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
11,719,127 |
|
|
$ |
2,382,102 |
|
|
$ |
14,101,229 |
|
|
$ |
12,664,059 |
|
|
$ |
13,075,868 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,299,929 |
|
|
|
287,159 |
|
|
|
1,587,088 |
|
|
|
1,724,373 |
|
|
|
1,882,069 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
675,629 |
|
|
|
699,350 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
4,750,068 |
|
|
|
1,166,837 |
|
|
|
5,916,905 |
|
|
|
4,603,245 |
|
|
|
4,547,372 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,759,798 |
|
|
|
170,129 |
|
|
|
3,929,927 |
|
|
|
4,045,807 |
|
|
|
4,191,410 |
|
|
Total loans HIP |
|
$ |
22,142,482 |
|
|
$ |
4,006,227 |
|
|
$ |
26,148,709 |
|
|
$ |
23,713,113 |
|
|
$ |
24,396,069 |
|
|
The following table presents acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 as
of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually-required principal and interest |
|
$ |
10,995,387 |
|
Non-accretable difference |
|
|
5,789,480 |
|
|
Cash flows expected to be collected |
|
|
5,205,907 |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
1,303,908 |
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 |
|
$ |
3,901,999 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Reflects a difference of $11.4 million compared with the amounts disclosed in
the Form 8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010, which included the financial statements and
exhibits pertaining to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at the acquisition
date. The Corporation reassessed the classification of certain acquired loans and, due
to their revolving characteristics, reclassified the loans for accounting purposes from
ASC Subtopic 310-30 to ASC Subtopic 310-20. The reclassification did not impact the fair
value of the loans. |
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the
underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of
the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted under ASC
Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $7.8 billion as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date.
31
Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the acquired loans in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction as of and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, and which
are accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
of loans |
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions [1] |
|
$ |
1,303,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,901,999 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(95,506 |
) |
|
|
95,506 |
|
Payments received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338,308 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,208,402 |
|
|
$ |
3,659,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents the estimated fair value of the loans at the date of
acquisition. There were no reclassifications from non-accretable
difference to accretable yield from April 30, 2010 to September 30, 2010. |
As of September 30, 2010, none of the acquired loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were
considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference
between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all
acquired loans.
As indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation accounts for lines
of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which
requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess
of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loan,
if the loan is accruing interest. The following table presents acquired loans accounted for under
ASC Subtopic 310-20 as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20 |
|
$ |
358,989 |
[1] |
|
Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest) |
|
$ |
1,007,880 |
|
|
Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
$ |
614,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Reflects a difference of $11.4 million compared with the amounts disclosed in the Form
8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010, which included the financial statements and exhibits
pertaining to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at the acquisition date. The
Corporation reassessed the classification of certain acquired loans and, due to their
revolving characteristics, reclassified the loans for accounting purposes from ASC Subtopic
310-30 to ASC Subtopic 310-20. The reclassification did not impact the fair value of the
loans. |
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the
underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments. The unpaid principal balance of
the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted pursuant to
ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $739 million as of the April 30, 2010 transaction date.
There was no need to record an allowance for loan losses related to the covered loans as of
September 30, 2010.
The activity in the allowance for loan losses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
|
$ |
882,807 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Loan charge-offs |
|
|
(750,609 |
) |
|
|
(776,119 |
) |
Loan recoveries |
|
|
75,928 |
|
|
|
47,677 |
|
|
Balance as of September 30 |
|
$ |
1,243,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
|
Note 12 Transfers of Financial Assets and Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA
and FNMA securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and
servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the
corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/servicer agreements the Corporation is required to
service the loans in accordance with the agencies servicing guidelines and standards.
Substantially all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA and FNMA securities have
fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain
representations and
32
warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in some instances, has sold
loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation retained servicing rights on
guaranteed mortgage securitizations (FNMA and GNMA) and whole loan sales involving approximately
$697 million in principal balance outstanding (September 30, 2009 $1.2 billion). During the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Corporation recognized net gains of approximately
$3.8 million and $12.6 million, respectively, on these transactions (September 30, 2009 $6.4
million for the quarter and $32.8 million for the nine-month period). All loan sales or
securitizations performed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were without credit
recourse arrangements.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $227 million of
assets as a result of securitization transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $223 million in
mortgage-backed securities and $4 million in servicing rights. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporation obtained as proceeds $645 million of assets as a result of
securitization transactions with FNMA and GNMA, consisting of $634 million in mortgage-backed
securities and $11 million in servicing rights. No liabilities were incurred as a result of these
transfers during the quarter and nine month-period ended September 30, 2010 because they did not
contain any credit recourse arrangements. The Corporation recorded a
net gain of $3.0 million and $13.2
million, respectively, during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to these
residential mortgage loans securitized.
The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from
residential mortgage loans securitized during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Obtained During the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
168,622 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,136 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,758 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,932 |
|
|
$ |
226,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds Obtained During the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Initial Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
496,223 |
|
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
500,370 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,641 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
626,864 |
|
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
631,011 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,467 |
|
|
$ |
11,467 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629,674 |
|
|
$ |
15,614 |
|
|
$ |
645,288 |
|
|
Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for key inputs, assumptions, and
valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of these mortgage-backed securities and
mortgage servicing rights.
33
Mortgage servicing rights
The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights
are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations.
Classes of mortgage servicing rights were determined based on the different markets or types of
assets being serviced. The Corporation recognizes the servicing rights of its banking subsidiaries
that are related to residential mortgage loans as a class of servicing rights. These mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) are measured at fair value. Fair value determination is performed on a
subsidiary basis, with assumptions varying in accordance with the types of assets or markets
served.
The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The
discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate,
cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late
fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporations loan
characteristics and portfolio behavior.
The following table presents the changes in residential MSRs measured using the fair value method
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Fair value as of January 1 |
|
$ |
169,747 |
|
|
$ |
176,034 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
11,909 |
|
|
|
19,640 |
|
Changes due to payments on loans [1] |
|
|
(11,990 |
) |
|
|
(10,750 |
) |
Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model
inputs or assumptions |
|
|
(7,969 |
) |
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
Fair value as of September 30 |
|
$ |
165,947 |
|
|
$ |
180,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows over time. |
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $18.0 billion as of September 30, 2010
(December 31, 2009 $17.7 billion; September 30, 2009 $17.7 billion).
Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of other service fees in the consolidated statements of
operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, which may
result from changes in the valuation model inputs or assumptions (principally reflecting changes in
discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions) and other changes, including changes due to
collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value
adjustments, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 amounted to $11.7 million and
$35.4 million, respectively (September 30, 2009 $11.7 million and $34.7 million, respectively).
The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan
balance. As of September 30, 2010, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.27%
(September 30, 2009 0.26%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not
generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.
The discussion that follows includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the
MSRs, originated and purchased.
Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights retained at the date of the
residential mortgage loan securitizations and whole loan sales by the banking subsidiaries during
the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and year ended December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Prepayment speed |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
Weighted average life |
|
20.1 years |
|
12.8 years |
Discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
34
Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and
securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to
immediate changes in those assumptions as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originated MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
98,966 |
|
|
$ |
97,870 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
11.2 years |
|
8.8 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($3,386 |
) |
|
|
($3,182 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($6,684 |
) |
|
|
($7,173 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
12.80 |
% |
|
|
12.41 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($4,062 |
) |
|
|
($2,715 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($7,911 |
) |
|
|
($6,240 |
) |
The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial
institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the
sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions as of period end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased MSRs |
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Fair value of retained interests |
|
$ |
66,981 |
|
|
$ |
71,877 |
|
Weighted average life |
|
12.1 years |
|
9.9 years |
Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate) |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,636 |
) |
|
|
($2,697 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($4,655 |
) |
|
|
($5,406 |
) |
Weighted average discount rate (annual rate) |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
|
($2,923 |
) |
|
|
($2,331 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
($5,180 |
) |
|
|
($4,681 |
) |
The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are
hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value
based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because
the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular
assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example,
increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses),
which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.1 billion (December 31, 2009 and September
30, 2009 $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.
Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation has the right to repurchase, at its option and
without GNMAs prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed
mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual
loans meet GNMAs specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation
is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans. As of September 30, 2010, the
Corporation had recorded $163 million in mortgage loans on its financial statements related to this
buy-back option program (December 31, 2009 $124 million; September 30, 2009 $112 million).
35
Note 13 Other Assets
The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of condition consists of the following
major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Net deferred tax assets (net of
valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
336,661 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
$ |
380,596 |
|
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
292,493 |
|
|
|
99,772 |
|
|
|
97,817 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
236,824 |
|
|
|
232,387 |
|
|
|
230,579 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
164,190 |
|
|
|
206,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
91,193 |
|
|
|
130,762 |
|
|
|
144,949 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
85,180 |
|
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
81,249 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
37,996 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
Others |
|
|
215,448 |
|
|
|
218,795 |
|
|
|
213,256 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,459,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,324,917 |
|
|
$ |
1,156,721 |
|
|
Note 14 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, allocated by reportable segments and corporate group, were as follows (refer to Note 29 for
the definition of the Corporations reportable segments):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
Purchase accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
on acquisition |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,255 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($45,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($45,246 |
) |
|
$ |
665,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
Goodwill |
|
Purchase accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
(In thousands) |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
on acquisition |
|
adjustments |
|
Other |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
606,508 |
|
|
The goodwill recognized in the BPPR reportable segment during 2010 relates to the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for further
information on the accounting for the transaction and the resulting goodwill recognition. The fair
values initially assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of
the acquisition as new information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. Any
changes in such fair value estimates may impact the goodwill initially recorded.
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of the processing and technology
business, which resulted in a $45 million reduction of goodwill for the Corporation. See Note 3 to
the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the sale. The goodwill from
EVERTEC was included in the Corporate group since EVERTEC is no longer considered a reportable
segment as discussed in Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements.
36
The gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses at the beginning and the end of the
quarter by reportable segment and Corporate group were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Balance at January |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January |
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
1, 2010 (Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
1, 2010 (Net |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Accumulated |
|
September 30, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
amounts) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
$ |
263,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,255 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
|
|
566,489 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
402,078 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
768,943 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
604,349 |
|
|
$ |
829,744 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
$ |
665,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance at January |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January |
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
1, 2009 (Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
1, 2009 (Net |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Accumulated |
|
September 30, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
amounts) |
|
(Gross amounts) |
|
Impairment Losses |
|
(Net amounts) |
|
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
157,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,059 |
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
157,025 |
|
Banco Popular North America |
|
|
568,648 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
|
|
568,648 |
|
|
$ |
164,411 |
|
|
|
404,237 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
44,679 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
44,496 |
|
|
|
45,429 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
45,246 |
|
|
Total Popular, Inc. |
|
$ |
770,386 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
605,792 |
|
|
$ |
771,102 |
|
|
$ |
164,594 |
|
|
$ |
606,508 |
|
|
The accumulated impairment losses in the BPNA reportable segment are associated with E-LOAN.
As of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $6 million
of identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, with indefinite useful lives.
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gross |
|
Accumulated |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Core deposits |
|
$ |
80,591 |
|
|
$ |
27,721 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
30,991 |
|
|
$ |
65,379 |
|
|
$ |
29,276 |
|
Other
customer relationships |
|
|
4,719 |
|
|
|
3,291 |
|
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,804 |
|
|
|
8,816 |
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
85,435 |
|
|
$ |
31,111 |
|
|
$ |
74,320 |
|
|
$ |
36,866 |
|
|
$ |
76,982 |
|
|
$ |
37,263 |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $24 million in a
core deposit intangible asset associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. This core
deposit intangible asset is to be amortized to operating expenses ratably on a monthly basis over a
10-year period.
Certain core deposits and other customer relationships intangibles with a gross amount of $9
million and $0.8 million respectively, became fully amortized during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, and, as such, their gross amount and accumulated amortization were eliminated
from the tabular disclosure presented above. The decrease in other customer relationships category
was associated to the sale of the ownership interest in EVERTEC described in Note 3 to the
consolidated financial statements.
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $2.4
million and $6.9 million, respectively, in amortization related to other intangible assets with
definite useful lives (September 30, 2009 $2.4 million and $7.2 million, respectively).
37
The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite
useful lives for each of the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2010
|
|
$ |
2,242 |
|
Year 2011
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
Year 2012
|
|
|
8,409 |
|
Year 2013
|
|
|
8,225 |
|
Year 2014
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
Year 2015
|
|
|
5,478 |
|
|
Results of the Goodwill Impairment Test
The Corporations goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite
useful life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for
impairment at least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate
impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse
change in the business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the
competitive environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.
Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first
step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with
its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its
carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed.
The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for
which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which
is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the
aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles (including
any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the
reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting
unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of
the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the requirements of the fair value
measurements accounting standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions,
thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair
value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the
assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair
value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of
condition. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting
unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair
value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss
recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss
establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not
permitted under applicable accounting standards.
The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization
during the third quarter of 2010 using July 31, 2010 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting
units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which
are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation follows push-down accounting,
as such all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of
methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as
discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting
unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates
the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value
drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in
specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.
The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that
are used as part
38
of these evaluations include:
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business,
location and size; |
|
|
|
|
a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; |
|
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of
equity; |
|
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and |
|
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions. |
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average
price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the
reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the
reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment
is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an
assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is
inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of
judgment.
For purposes of the discounted cash flows (DCF) approach, the valuation is based on estimated
future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting
unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the
Corporations Asset / Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The growth assumptions included in
these projections are based on managements expectations for each reporting units financial
prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity
(i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows
was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 8.42% to 23.24% for the 2010
analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return
of a risk-free asset (10-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as
equity risk premium, size premium, and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were
analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made
when necessary.
For BPNA, the only reporting unit that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of
Step 1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable
companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market
multiples used included price to book and price to tangible book. Additionally, the Corporation
determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on BPNAs financial
projections, but assigned no weight to it given that the current market approaches provide a more
meaningful measure of fair value considering the reporting units financial performance and current
market conditions. The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF)
was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31),
requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation
performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, including any recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNAs net assets. To complete Step
2, the Corporation subtracted from BPNAs Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net
assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $402 million at July 31,
2010, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in BPNAs Step 1 fair value was offset by
a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill
that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill.
The analysis of the results for Step 2 indicates that the reduction in the fair value of the
reporting unit was mainly attributed to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not
to the fair value of the reporting unit as a going concern entity. The current negative performance
of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated credit quality in its loan portfolio,
which agrees with the results of the Step 2 analysis. The fair value determined for BPNAs loan
portfolio in the July 31, 2010 annual test represented a discount of 23.6%, compared with 20.2% at
December 31, 2009. The discount is mainly attributed to market participants expected rate of
returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and construction loan portfolios and
deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios of BPNA. Refer to Note 29
to the consolidated financial statements, which provides highlights of BPNAs reportable segment
financial performance for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010. BPNAs
provision for loan losses, as a stand-alone legal entity, which is the reporting unit
level used for the goodwill impairment analysis, amounted to $226 million for nine months ended
September 30, 2010, which represented 144% of BPNA legal entitys net loss of $157 million for that
period.
39
If the Step 1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in
the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in
the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The
Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNAs
goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNAs loan portfolios as of the July 31, 2010
valuation date. Management discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the
relevant values for conclusions and determined they were reasonable.
Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair
values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding
that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2010 annual
assessment were reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and
assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill
that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporations results of operations and the reporting
units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporations market capitalization increase
the risk of goodwill impairment in the future.
Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these
events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting
unit below its carrying amount. As indicated in this MD&A, the economic situation in the United
States and Puerto Rico, including deterioration in the housing market and credit market, continued
to negatively impact the financial results of the Corporation during 2010.
Note 15 Deposits
Total interest bearing deposits as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
6,126,358 |
|
|
$ |
5,480,124 |
|
NOW, money market and other
interest bearing demand
deposits |
|
|
4,854,392 |
|
|
|
4,726,204 |
|
|
Total savings, NOW, money
market and other
interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
10,980,750 |
|
|
|
10,206,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000 |
|
|
6,609,544 |
[1] |
|
|
6,553,022 |
[1] |
$100,000 and over |
|
|
4,778,311 |
|
|
|
4,670,243 |
|
|
Total certificates of deposits |
|
|
11,387,855 |
|
|
|
11,223,265 |
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
22,368,605 |
|
|
$ |
21,429,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Includes brokered certificates of deposit amounting to $2.5 billion as of September 30,
2010 and $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2009. |
A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity as of September 30, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2010 |
|
$ |
3,332,971 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,775,554 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,360,520 |
|
2013 |
|
|
655,948 |
|
2014 |
|
|
398,443 |
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
864,419 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,387,855 |
|
|
40
Note 16 Borrowings
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
2,358,139 |
|
|
$ |
2,632,790 |
|
|
$ |
2,807,891 |
|
|
The repurchase agreements outstanding as of September 30, 2010 were collateralized by $2.1
billion in investment securities available-for-sale, $435
million in trading securities and
$39 million in other assets. It is the Corporations policy to maintain effective control over
assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on
the consolidated statements of condition.
In addition, there were repurchase agreements outstanding collateralized by $170 million in
securities purchased underlying agreements to resell to which the Corporation has the right to
repledge. It is the Corporations policy to take possession of securities purchased under
agreements to resell. However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control
over such securities, and accordingly are not reflected in the Corporations consolidated
statements of condition.
Other short-term borrowings consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Secured borrowing with clearing broker with an interest rate of 1.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances with the FHLB maturing in October 2010 paying interest at maturity
at fixed rates ranging from 0.41% to 0.43% |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured borrowings with private investors paying interest at a fixed rate of 0.45% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
Term funds purchased maturing in 2010 paying interest at maturity
at fixed rates ranging from 0.65% to 1.15% |
|
|
65,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
Total other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
7,326 |
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
41
Notes payable consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Advances with the FHLB: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-with maturities ranging from 2011 through 2015 paying interest at monthly fixed
rates ranging from 3.31% to 5.02% (September 30, 2009 1.48% to 5.06%) |
|
$ |
568,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,103,627 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,429 |
|
-maturing in 2010 paying interest quarterly at a fixed rate of 5.10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note issued to the FDIC, including unamortized premium of $2,242; paying
interest monthly at an annual fixed rate of 2.50%; maturing on April 30, 2015
or such earlier date as such amount may become due and payable pursuant to
the terms of the note |
|
|
3,288,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes paying interest monthly at fixed rates ranging from 3.00% to 6.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2011 to 2013 paying interest semiannually
at fixed rates ranging from 5.25% to 13.00% (September 30, 2009 5.20% to 9.75%) |
|
|
381,064 |
|
|
|
382,858 |
|
|
|
383,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes with maturities ranging from 2010 to 2013 paying interest
monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes paying interest quarterly at a floating rate of 6.00% to 7.50%
over the 3-month LIBOR rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred
securities) with maturities ranging from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest
rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 17) |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred
securities) ($936,000 less discount of $496,678 as of September 30, 2010) with no
stated maturity and a fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding December 5,
2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to Note 17) |
|
|
439,322 |
|
|
|
423,650 |
|
|
|
418,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
25,448 |
|
|
|
27,169 |
|
|
|
27,259 |
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
5,143,388 |
|
|
$ |
2,648,632 |
|
|
$ |
2,649,821 |
|
|
Note: Refer to the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, for rates and maturity information corresponding to the
borrowings outstanding as of such date. Key index rates as of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, were as follows:
3-month LIBOR rate = 0.29% and 0.29%; 10-year U.S. Treasury note = 2.51% and 3.31%.
In consideration for the excess assets acquired over liabilities assumed as part of the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR issued to the FDIC a secured note (the note issued to
the FDIC) in the amount of $5.8 billion as of April 30, 2010 bearing an annual interest rate of
2.50%, which has full recourse to BPPR. As indicated in Notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial
statements, the note issued to the FDIC is collateralized by the loans (other than certain consumer
loans) and other real estate acquired in the agreement with the FDIC and all proceeds derived from
such assets, including cash inflows from claims to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.
Proceeds received from such sources are used to pay the note under the conditions stipulated in the
agreement. The entire outstanding principal balance of the note issued to the FDIC is due five
years from issuance (April 30, 2015), or such date as such amount may become due and payable
pursuant to the terms of the note. Borrowings under the note bear interest at a fixed annual rate
of 2.50% and is paid monthly. If the Corporation fails to pay any interest as and when due, such
interest shall accrue interest at the note interest rate plus 2.00% per annum. The Corporation may
repay the note in whole or in part without any penalty subject to certain notification requirements
indicated in the agreement. During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation prepaid $2.1 billion
of the note issued to the FDIC from funds unrelated to the assets securing the note.
42
A breakdown of borrowings by contractual maturities as of September 30, 2010 is included in the
table below. Given its nature, the maturity of the note issued to the FDIC was based on expected
repayment dates and not on its April 30, 2015 contractual maturity date. The expected repayments
consider the timing of expected cash inflows on the loans, OREO and claims on the loss sharing
agreements that will be applied to repay the note during the period that the note payable to the
FDIC is outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and repurchase |
|
Short-term |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
agreements |
|
borrowings |
|
Notes payable |
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,195,949 |
|
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
633,071 |
|
|
$ |
2,020,362 |
|
2011 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835,637 |
|
|
|
2,885,637 |
|
2012 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
631,835 |
|
|
|
706,835 |
|
2013 |
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,322 |
|
|
|
175,322 |
|
2014 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,824 |
|
|
|
360,824 |
|
Later years |
|
|
638,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,377 |
|
|
|
1,104,567 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
2,358,139 |
|
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
5,640,066 |
|
|
$ |
8,189,547 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496,678 |
) |
|
|
(496,678 |
) |
|
Total borrowings |
|
$ |
2,358,139 |
|
|
$ |
191,342 |
|
|
$ |
5,143,388 |
|
|
$ |
7,692,869 |
|
|
Note 17 Trust Preferred Securities
As of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, the Corporation had established
four trusts (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and
Popular Capital Trust II) for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (also referred to
as capital securities) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the
proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the common securities),
were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the junior
subordinated debentures) issued by the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established
the Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock
held by the U.S. Treasury at the time for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In
connection with this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the
proceeds of issuance and sale of common securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated
debentures issued by the Corporation.
The sole assets of the five trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the
Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the
Corporation.
The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the
consolidated statements of condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are
included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or
indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.
43
Financial data pertaining to the trusts as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009 were as follows:
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BanPonce |
|
Popular Capital |
|
America Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
|
Popular Capital |
Issuer |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Trust III |
|
Capital securities |
|
$ |
52,865 |
|
|
$ |
181,063 |
|
|
$ |
91,651 |
|
|
$ |
101,023 |
|
|
$ |
935,000 |
|
Distribution rate |
|
|
8.327 |
% |
|
|
6.700 |
% |
|
|
6.564 |
% |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
5.000% until, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but excluding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 5, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 9.000% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter |
Common securities |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
5,601 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
aggregate
liquidation amount |
|
$ |
54,502 |
|
|
$ |
186,664 |
|
|
$ |
94,486 |
|
|
$ |
104,148 |
|
|
$ |
936,000 |
|
Stated maturity date |
|
February 2027 |
|
November 2033 |
|
September 2034 |
|
December 2034 |
|
Perpetual |
Reference notes |
|
|
(a),(c),(f), |
(g) |
|
|
(b),(d), |
(e) |
|
|
(a),(c), |
(f) |
|
|
(b),(d), |
(f) |
|
|
(b),(d),(h), |
(i) |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America (PNA) and
indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
[b] |
|
Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation. |
|
[c] |
|
The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the
capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
[d] |
|
These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by
the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. |
|
[e] |
|
The original issuance was for $150 million. The Corporation had reacquired $6 million of
the 8.327% capital securities at December 31, 2008. |
|
[f] |
|
The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal
Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below,
the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior
subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated
maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements,
in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time
within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment
company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital
securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval. |
|
[g] |
|
Same as [f] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early
redemption. |
|
[h] |
|
The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the
consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. |
|
[i] |
|
Carrying value of junior subordinates debentures of $439 million as of September 30, 2010
($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $497 million discount); $424 million as
of December 31, 2009 ($936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $512 million
discount), and $419 million as of September 30, 2009 ($936 million aggregate liquidation
amount, net of $517 million discount). |
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities
represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 Capital, subject to quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1
Capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements
(including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). As of September
30, 2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation.
Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. As of December 31, 2009, there
were $7 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities which were disallowed as Tier 1
capital. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be
included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. The Federal Reserve Board revised the
quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital elements included in the Tier 1
capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including restricted
core capital elements), net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. The new limit
would be effective on March 31, 2011. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, recently passed in July 2010, has a provision to effectively phase out the use of
trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital throughout a
44
five-year period. As of September 30,
2010, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities (capital securities) that are
subject to the phase-out. As of September 30, 2010, the remaining trust preferred securities corresponded
to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008, and were issued prior to October 4, 2010 and thus, are exempt from the Dodd-Frank
banking bill provision.
Note 18 Stockholders Equity
Increase in authorized shares of common stock
On May 4, 2010, following stockholder approval, the Corporation amended its certificate of
incorporation to provide for an increase in the number of shares of the Corporations common stock
authorized for issuance from 700 million shares to 1.7 billion shares.
Issuance of depositary shares representing preferred stock and conversion to shares of common
stock
In April 2010, the Corporation raised $1.15 billion through the sale of 46,000,000 depositary
shares, each representing a 1/40th interest in a share of Contingent Convertible Perpetual
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D, no par value, $1,000 liquidation preference per share.
The preferred stock represented by depositary shares automatically converted into shares of
Popular, Inc.s common stock at a conversion rate of 8.3333 shares of common stock for each
depositary share on May 11, 2010, which was the 5th business day after the Corporations
common shareholders approved the amendment to the Corporations restated certificate of
incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock. The conversion of the
depositary shares of preferred stock resulted in the issuance of 383,333,333 additional shares of
common stock. The net proceeds from the public offering amounted to approximately $1.1 billion,
after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. Note 23 to the
consolidated financial statements provides information on the impact of the conversion on net
income per common share.
BPPR statutory reserve
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPRs statutory reserve fund totaled $402 million as of
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $402 million; September 30, 2009 $392 million). There
were no transfers between the statutory reserve account and the retained earnings account during
the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Note 19 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit amounted to $19 million and $116
million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $13 million and $134 million,
respectively; and September 30, 2009 $18 million and $162 million, respectively). In addition,
the Corporation has commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to $64 million as of
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $48 million; September 30, 2009 $55 million).
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.5 million (December 31, 2009 -
$0.7 million and September 30, 2009 $0.6 million), which represents the unamortized balance of
the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. The
Corporation recognizes at fair value the obligation at inception of the standby letters of credit.
The fair value approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These
fees are deferred and recognized over the commitment period. This liability is included as part of
other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The contract amounts in standby
letters of credit outstanding represent the maximum potential amount of future payments the
Corporation could be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the
customers. These standby letters of credit are used by the customer as a credit enhancement and
typically expire without being drawn upon. In the event of nonperformance by the customers, the
Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral provided, if any, which
45
normally includes cash
and marketable securities, real estate, receivables, among others. Management does not anticipate
any material losses related to these instruments.
Commitments to extend credit, which include credit card lines, commercial lines of credit, and
other unused credit commitments, amounted to $6.2 billion as of September 30, 2010 (December 31,
2009 $7.0 billion; September 30, 2009 $7.0 billion), excluding the commitments to extend credit
that pertain to the lending relationships of the Westernbank operations.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $8 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit unrelated to the acquired lending relationships from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction (December 31, 2009 $15 million; September 30, 2009 $18 million). The estimated
reserve is principally based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and
the application of the corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance
for loan losses methodology. This reserve for unfunded exposures remains separate and distinct from
the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part of other liabilities in the consolidated
statement of condition.
As of September 30, 2010, the commitments to extend credit related to the Westernbank acquired
lending relationships approximated $176 million. The acquired commitments to extend credit are
covered under the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, subject to FDIC approvals, limitations on
the timing for such disbursements, and servicing guidelines, among various considerations. As
indicated in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on the April 30, 2010 acquisition
date, the Corporation recorded a contingent liability for such commitments at fair value. As of
September 30, 2010, that contingent liability amounted to $120 million and is recorded as part of
other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
The Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral
for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may have sold, in bulk
sale transactions, residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse or to certain
representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and
warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral,
prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans
under the credit recourse agreements or for breach of representations and warranties.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.1 billion (December 31, 2009 $4.5 billion;
September 30, 2009 $4.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse
provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac programs. In the event of any
customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation may be required to
repurchase the loan or reimburse for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future
payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the
event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the
residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation repurchased approximately $93 million in mortgage
loans subject to the credit recourse provisions. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower,
the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation
suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying
a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any
uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing of the related property. Most
claims associated with the residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions are
settled by repurchases of delinquent loans. As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations liability
established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with
credit recourse amounted to $38 million (December 31, 2009 $16 million; September 30, 2009 $16
million).
The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a
liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in
the line itemgain (loss) on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves, and
valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale in the consolidated statements of operations)
throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes
available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse
arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical
loss experience, foreclosure rate,
46
estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods
are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan
segmentations.The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan
over a twelve-month period, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability
of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent
within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between
the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value rates,
loan aging, among others.
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged
for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may
sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not
meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or
indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures
are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The
Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial
statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to
mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the
Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and
insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporation serviced $18.0 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit
recourse (December 31, 2009 $17.7 billion; September 30, 2009 $17.7 billion). The Corporation
generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from
liquidation proceeds from mortgage loans foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the
applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation
must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The
Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage
loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part
of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income
with respect to that loan. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by
the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $25 million
(December 31, 2009 $14 million; September 30, 2009 $14 million). To the extent the mortgage
loans underlying the Corporations servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the
Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation
to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in
collection efforts.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representations and
warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN. Loans had been sold to investors on
a servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation is required to make certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. The loans had been sold prior to 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations reserve for estimated losses from such representation
and warranty arrangements amounted to $35 million, which was included as part of other liabilities
in the consolidated statement of condition (December 31, 2009 $33 million; September 30, 2009
$21 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans, since the subsidiary ceased these
activities during 2008. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reassesses its estimate for expected
losses associated to E-LOANs customary representation and warranty arrangements. The analysis
incorporates expectations on future disbursements based on quarterly repurchases and make-whole
events. The analysis also considers factors such as the average length-time between the loans
funding date and the loan repurchase date as observed in the historical loan data. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, E-LOAN charged-off approximately $8.8 million against this
representation and warranty reserve associated with loan repurchases and indemnification or
make-whole events (nine months ended September 30, 2009 $13.2 million). Make-whole events are
typically defaulted loans in which the investor attempts to recover through the collateral or
guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or unrecovered
47
portion of the loan.
Claims have been predominantly for first mortgage agency loans and principally consist of
underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or missing documentation.
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or
warranties in connection with various sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. These
sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. The agreements primarily include indemnification for
breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time
period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do
not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability
defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding as of
September 30, 2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporations reserve related to PFHs indemnity arrangements amounted to $4 million (December
31, 2009 $9 million; September 30, 2009 $19 million). During the nine months ended September
30, 2010, the Corporation recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFHs representation and
warranty arrangements amounting to approximately $2.3 million (nine months ended September 30, 2009
- $1.2 million). The reserve balance as of September 30, 2010 contemplates historical indemnity
payments. Certain indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement of
premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase obligations for defaulted loans within a short-term
period, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to
guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations.
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing
obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries totaling $0.6 billion
as of September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009 $0.6 billion; September 30, 2009 $0.7 billion). In
addition, as of September 30, 2010, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated
basis $1.4 billion of capital securities (trust preferred securities) (December 31, 2009 $1.4
billion; September 30, 2009 $1.4 billion) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the
extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 17 to the consolidated
financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the true up
measurement date of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered
assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to
reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true up payment is recorded as a reduction
in the fair value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the
final disposition of these matters, except for the matters described below which are each in early
stages and management cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and September 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc., certain of its directors and
officers, among others. The five class actions have now been consolidated into two separate
actions: a securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero
v. Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action
entitled In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v.
Popular, Inc. et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
included as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock, among
others. The consolidated action purports to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities
between January 24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the defendants violated Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading.
The consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts
48
necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint seeks class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular, the underwriter
defendants and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action
complaint. On August 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the
motion to dismiss filed by the underwriter defendants on statute of limitations grounds. The Court
also dismissed the Section 11 claim brought against Populars directors on statute of limitations
grounds and the Section 12(a)(2) claim brought against Popular because plaintiffs lacked standing.
The Court declined to dismiss the claims brought against Popular and certain of its officers under
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder), Section 20(a) of the
Exchange Act, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, holding that plaintiffs had adequately
alleged that defendants made materially false and misleading statements with the requisite state of
mind.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated complaint purports to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc.
U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment
Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409
and 502(a)(2) of ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleges that the
defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to
eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint seeks to recover
alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive
trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a
scheduling order issued by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to
the amended complaint. Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the
alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted. On May 19,
2010, Popular filed objections to the magistrate judges report and recommendation. On June 21,
2010, plaintiffs filed a response to these objections. On July 9, 2010, with leave of the Court,
Popular filed a reply to plaintiffs response. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order
without opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss and providing that the
Court would issue an opinion and order explaining its decision. To date, no opinion has been
issued. Discovery is ongoing in the ERISA case, and the parties have agreed to coordinate
discovery with respect to common issues with discovery in the García and Hoff cases.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) have been brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints seek a judgment
that the action is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the
Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities class
action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García
complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On
November 20, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the
individual defendants moved to dismiss the García amended complaint. At a scheduling conference
held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in both the Hoff and García matters pending
resolution of their respective motions to dismiss. On August 11, 2010, the Court granted in part
and denied in part the motion to dismiss the Garcia action. The Court dismissed the gross
mismanagement and corporate waste claims, but declined to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty
claim. Discovery has now commenced in the Hoff and Garcia actions and is to proceed in coordinated
fashion. At the Courts request, the parties to the Hoff and Garcia cases discussed the prospect
of mediation and have agreed to nonbinding mediation in an attempt to determine whether the cases
can be settled.
The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan, was removed to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants moved to consolidate the
García and Díaz actions. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved to remand the Díaz case to the Puerto
Rico Court of First Instance and to stay defendants consolidation motion pending the outcome of
the remand proceedings. On
49
September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order without opinion remanding
the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance. On October 13, 2010, the Court issued a
Statement of Reasons In Support of Remand Order. On October 28, 2010, Popular and the individual
defendants moved for reconsideration of the remand order. The reconsideration motion is pending.
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that the plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under
Puerto Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, the plaintiff in that action moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On May 4, 2010, the Court denied plaintiffs request for
reconsideration. On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed an appeal before the Puerto Rico Court of
Appeals. On June 11, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the appeal. On
June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. On July 6, 2010, plaintiff moved for
reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On July 16, 2010, the Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs
request for reconsideration.
On October 7, 2010, a new putative class action suit for breach of contract and damages, captioned
Almeyda-Santiago v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance
against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The complaint essentially asserts that plaintiff has suffered
damages because of Banco Populars alleged fraudulent overdraft fee practices in connection with debit
card transactions. Such practices allegedly consist of: (a) the reorganization of electronic debit
transactions in high-to-low order so as to multiply the number of overdraft fees assessed on its customers;
(b) the assessment of overdraft fees even when clients have not overdrawn their accounts; (c) the failure
to disclose, or to adequately disclose, its overdraft policy to its customers; and (d) the provision of false
and fraudulent information regarding its clients account balances at point of sale transactions and on its
website. Plaintiff seeks damages, restitution and provisional remedies against Banco Popular for breach of
contract, abuse of trust, illegal conversion and unjust enrichment.
The Corporation intends to contend vigorously these
claims.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporations results of
operations.
Note 20 Non-Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Corporation transfers residential mortgage loans in guaranteed loan securitizations. The
Corporations continuing involvement in these transfers includes owning certain beneficial
interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is
not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to
which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent
retained, are classified in the Corporations consolidated statement of condition as
available-for-sale or trading securities.
The Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage
securitization transactions. These special purpose entities are deemed to be variable interest
entities (VIEs) since they lack equity investments at risk. As part of the adoption of ASU
2009-17, during the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation evaluated these guaranteed mortgage
securitization structures in which it participates, including GNMA and FNMA, and concluded that the
Corporation is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, are not required to be
consolidated in the Corporations financial statements. The Corporation qualitatively assessed
whether it held a controlling financial interest in these VIEs, which included analyzing if it had
both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be
significant to the VIE. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA and GNMA)
control the design of the VIE, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the
underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at
will, and remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA. Moreover,
through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA and GNMA) have the obligation to absorb losses
that could be potentially significant to the VIE. The conclusion on the assessment of these
guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions did not change during the third quarter of 2010.
The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the
Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency
mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label
collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of
continuing involvement. Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for additional
information on the debt securities outstanding as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the
Corporations consolidated statement of condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the
right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities
(SPEs)
and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were
transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees
that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs
because the servicing fees are
50
subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed
securities investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies.
The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the
Corporations variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a
result of the Corporations involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
104,978 |
|
|
$ |
104,984 |
|
|
Total servicing assets |
|
$ |
104,978 |
|
|
$ |
104,984 |
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing advances |
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
108,317 |
|
|
$ |
107,013 |
|
|
Maximum exposure to loss |
|
$ |
108,317 |
|
|
$ |
107,013 |
|
|
The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the
form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to
$9.4 billion as of September 30, 2010 and $9.3 billion as of December 31, 2009.
Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be
incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent
and that the value of the Corporations interests and any associated collateral declines to zero,
without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss
includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included
as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.
Note 21 Fair Value Measurement
ASC Subtopic 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in
order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The
hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1- Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these
instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are
based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2- Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3- Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs
by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted
market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs
internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest
rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those
necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is adequately representative of the
price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that
reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporations credit standing, constraints on liquidity
and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.
The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of
significant
51
judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in
calculating the fair value could significantly affect the results.
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporations assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009
and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private
label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5,730 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
5,741 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,269 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
6,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($91 |
) |
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($109 |
) |
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
private
label |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,658 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6,695 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6,962 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($73 |
) |
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
federal
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
3,445 |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total investment securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6,955 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
Trading account securities, excluding
derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and
political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Total trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
$ |
7,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($89 |
) |
|
54
The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
settlements, |
|
Transfers |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
(losses) |
|
and |
|
in (out) |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
as of June |
|
included in |
|
paydowns |
|
of Level |
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
(net) |
|
3 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($25 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($25 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
($88 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
($88 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
($10 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
|
($9 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
($113 |
) |
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
settlements, |
|
Transfers |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
and |
|
in (out) |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
paydowns |
|
of Level |
|
September |
|
September |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
(net) |
|
3 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($27 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment
securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($27 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
|
Trading account
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
224 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
($34 |
) |
|
|
($170 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
($34 |
) |
|
|
($170 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
|
($20 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
($12 |
) |
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
($15 |
) |
|
|
($18 |
) |
|
|
($197 |
) |
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
|
($12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains are included in OCI |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[c] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
Balance as |
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
Gains (losses) |
|
in accrued |
|
and |
|
of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
included in |
|
interest |
|
paydowns |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
receivable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
284 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($53 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
|
($4 |
) |
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value
pursuant to fair value option |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($49 |
) |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
|
[c] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the statement of operations |
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
earnings/OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales, |
|
|
|
|
|
related to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
issuances, |
|
|
|
|
|
assets and |
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Gains |
|
(decrease) |
|
settlements, |
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities still |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
(losses) |
|
in accrued |
|
and |
|
Balance as of |
|
held as of |
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
included in |
|
interest |
|
paydowns |
|
September |
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
receivable |
|
(net) |
|
30, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading account securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-
backed securities
agencies |
|
|
292 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading account
securities |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($60 |
) |
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
[a] |
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
($16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
[b] |
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured at fair value
pursuant to fair value option |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[c] |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
|
($14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($49 |
) |
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Trading account profit in the statement of operations |
|
[b] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Other service fees in the statement of operations |
|
[c] |
|
Gains (losses) are included in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the
statement of operations |
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were $113 million and $197
million, respectively, in transfers out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis. These transfers resulted from exempt FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed
securities, which were transferred out of Level 3 and into Level 2, as a result of a change in
valuation methodology from an internally-developed pricing matrix to pricing them based on a bonds
theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value
incorporates an option adjusted spread. Pursuant to the Corporations policy, these transfers were
recognized as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers in and / or out of Level
1 during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value
on a recurring basis during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009. There were no
transfers in and / or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the quarter and nine months ended September
30, 2009.
58
Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarters and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous
tables are reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
|
($10 |
) |
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
($12 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
($9 |
) |
|
|
($6 |
) |
|
|
($15 |
) |
|
|
($12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) relating to |
|
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
Total gains (losses) |
|
assets / liabilities |
|
|
included in |
|
still held at |
|
included in |
|
still held at |
(In millions) |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
earnings/OCI |
|
reporting date |
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees |
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
($4 |
) |
|
|
($16 |
) |
|
|
($6 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued
operations, net of
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
($7 |
) |
|
|
($3 |
) |
|
|
($14 |
) |
|
|
($1 |
) |
|
Additionally, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation may
be required to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent
to their initial recognition. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower of cost or fair value accounting, identification of impaired loans requiring specific
reserves under ASC Section 310-10-35 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, or
write-downs of individual assets. The following tables present financial and non-financial assets
that were subject to a fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and which were still included in the consolidated statement of
condition as of such dates. The amounts disclosed represent the aggregate fair value measurements
of those assets as of the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2010 |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
|
$ |
649 |
|
Loans held-for-sale [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other real estate owned [3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
$ |
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was
measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take
into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations,
in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. |
|
[2] |
|
Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments of loans held-for-sale and loans
transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. These adjustments were
principally determined based on negotiated price terms for the loans. |
|
[3] |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate owned that were measured at fair value. |
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2009 |
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
Other real estate owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Other foreclosed assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The
impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is
derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance
with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. |
|
[2] |
|
Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned
that were measured at fair value. |
|
|
Following is a description of the Corporations valuation methodologies used for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial
instruments and non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value of the financial
instruments disclosed do not represent managements estimate of the underlying value of the
Corporation.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields
that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities, which fair value is based on an active
exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities. The U.S. agency
securities are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto
Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated
and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the
evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two
sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks,
LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as MSRB, discount and capital rates, and
trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities agencies: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality
and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS
are classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced
using an internally-developed pricing matrix with quoted prices from local broker dealers.
These particular MBS are classified as Level 3. |
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private collateralized mortgage
obligations (CMOs) are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds
defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option
adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility
assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These CMOs are
classified as Level 2. Other CMOs, due to their limited liquidity, are classified as Level
3 due to the insufficiency of inputs such as broker quotes, executed trades, credit
information and cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active
exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in
highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate note (included as other in the available-for-sale category): The corporate
note is priced based on a spread to the U.S. Treasury market and adjustments may apply
based on observable market inputs such as sector, maturity, credit standing and reported
trade frequencies. This corporate note is |
60
|
|
|
classified as Level 2. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities and mutual funds (included as other in the trading account
securities category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained from broker
dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly
liquid markets, the corporate securities and mutual funds are classified as Level 2. The
important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares
are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based
on a relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In
addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less
frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3. |
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices.
MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The valuation model considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges,
other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Due to the unobservable
nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Derivatives
Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options are traded in over-the-counter active
markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or
equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing
models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as
forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of these derivatives are classified
as Level 2. The non-performance risk is determined using internally-developed models that consider
the collateral held, the remaining term, and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the
risk, and uses available public data or internally-developed data related to current spreads that
denote their probability of default.
Equity appreciation instrument
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the terms of the
equity appreciation instrument. The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument was estimated
by determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal
variables in determining the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument include the implied
volatility determined based on the historical daily volatility of the Corporations common stock,
the exercise price of the instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk-free rate. The
equity appreciation instrument is classified as Level 2.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from
appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in
similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Currently, the
associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.
Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments
Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were
priced based on bids received from potential buyers, secondary market prices, and discounted cash
flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss
estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets
Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial
loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of
foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion or an
internal valuation. These foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 given certain internal
adjustments that may be made to external appraisals.
61
Note 22 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial
instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and
may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.
The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder
excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.
Derivatives are considered financial instruments and their carrying value equals fair value.
For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been
estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as managements
best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of
future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.
The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate
environment as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In different interest
rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate
financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value
of the Corporations fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is,
they do not represent the Corporations value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation. The methods and
assumptions used to estimate the fair values of significant financial instruments as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are described in the paragraphs below.
Short-term financial assets and liabilities have relatively short maturities, or no defined
maturities, and little or no credit risk. The carrying amounts of other liabilities reported in the
consolidated statements of condition approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of
those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Included in this
category are: cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, bankers acceptances and assets sold under
agreements to repurchase and short-term borrowings. The equity appreciation instrument is included
in other liabilities and is accounted at fair value. Note 21 to the consolidated financial
statements provides a description of the valuation methodology for the equity appreciation
instrument. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities are valued using discounted
cash flows based on market rates currently available for agreements with similar terms and
remaining maturities.
Trading and investment securities, except for investments classified as other investment securities
in the consolidated statement of condition, are financial instruments that regularly trade on
secondary markets. The estimated fair value of these securities was determined using either market
prices or dealer quotes, where available, or quoted market prices of financial instruments with
similar characteristics. Trading account securities and securities available-for-sale are reported
at their respective fair values in the consolidated statements of condition since they are
marked-to-market for accounting purposes.
The estimated fair value for loans held-for-sale was based on secondary market prices, bids
received from potential buyers and discounted cash flow models. The fair values of the loans
held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were
segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit
cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest
rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit
price by discounting scheduled cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate
that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market
conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the
mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair
valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its
carrying amount.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing demand deposits,
savings, NOW, and
money market accounts was, for purposes of this disclosure, equal to the amount payable on demand
as of the
62
respective dates. The fair value of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of
contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on certificates with similar maturities.
The value of these deposits in a transaction between willing parties is in part dependent of the
buyers ability to reduce the servicing cost and the attrition that sometimes occurs. Therefore,
the amount a buyer would be willing to pay for these deposits could vary significantly from the
presented fair value.
Long-term borrowings were valued using discounted cash flows, based on market rates currently
available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and in certain instances using
quoted market rates for similar instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
As part of the fair value estimation procedures of certain liabilities, including repurchase
agreements (regular and structured) and FHLB advances, the Corporation considered, where
applicable, the collateralization levels as part of its evaluation of non-performance risk. Also,
for certificates of deposit, the non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed
models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term,
and the credit premium of the institution.
Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the FDIC loss share
indemnification asset, equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC and the contingent
liability on unfunded loan commitments, which are separately disclosed in the table below and all
relate to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The latter two items are included as other
liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar
agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was
estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. The fair value of letters
of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements.
Carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
2,604,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,604,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,680,127 |
|
|
$ |
1,680,127 |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
483,192 |
|
|
|
483,192 |
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
5,741,483 |
|
|
|
5,741,483 |
|
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
214,152 |
|
|
|
214,803 |
|
|
|
212,962 |
|
|
|
213,146 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
158,309 |
|
|
|
159,622 |
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
|
|
165,497 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
115,088 |
|
|
|
120,916 |
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
91,542 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
24,904,715 |
|
|
|
22,181,399 |
|
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
|
20,021,224 |
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
3,308,959 |
|
|
|
3,371,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
27,740,045 |
|
|
$ |
27,867,432 |
|
|
$ |
25,924,894 |
|
|
$ |
26,076,515 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,358,139 |
|
|
|
2,523,779 |
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
2,759,438 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
191,342 |
|
|
|
191,342 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
5,143,388 |
|
|
|
5,090,470 |
|
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
|
|
2,453,037 |
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan
commitments |
|
|
120,162 |
|
|
|
120,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
17,465 |
|
|
|
17,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
|
Notional |
|
Fair |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
6,297,380 |
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
$ |
7,013,148 |
|
|
$ |
882 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
134,663 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
147,647 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
63
Note 23 Net Income per Common Share
The computation of net income per common share (EPS) follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except share information) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($121,561 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($340,720 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
Deemed dividend on preferred stock [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
Favorable impact from exchange of shares of Series A and B
preferred stock for common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
Favorable impact from exchange of Series C preferred stock
for trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
161,944 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
1,021,374,014 |
|
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
839,196,564 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
|
|
1,021,374,014 |
|
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
839,509,525 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted EPS from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Basic and diluted EPS from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Basic and diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Deemed dividend related to the issuance of depositary shares and the conversion of the
preferred stock into shares of common stock in the second quarter of 2010. |
|
[2] |
|
Amount presented for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 represents the reversal of dividends
on Series C preferred stock considered accrued as of June 30, 2009 for EPS purposes only. These
cumulative dividends were not paid as dividends to the Series C preferred stockholders given the
terms of the exchange agreement to New Trust Preferred Securities, which was effected in August
2009. |
|
|
The conversion of contingently convertible perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock into
shares of the Corporations common stock during the second quarter of 2010, resulted in a
non-cash beneficial conversion of $191.7 million, representing the intrinsic value between the
conversion rate of $3.00 and the common stock closing price of $3.50 on April 13, 2010, the date
the preferred shares were offered. The beneficial conversion was recorded as a deemed dividend
to the preferred stockholders reducing retained earnings, with a corresponding offset to surplus
(paid in capital), and thus did not affect total stockholders equity or the book value of the
common stock. However, the deemed dividend decreased the net income applicable to common stock
and affected the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. Moreover, in computing diluted EPS, dilutive convertible securities that remained
outstanding for the period prior to actual conversion were not included as average potential
common shares because the effect would have been antidilutive. In computing both basic and
diluted EPS, the common shares issued upon actual conversion were included in the weighted
average calculation of common shares, after the date of conversion, provided that they remained
outstanding.
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that
the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount
of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the
exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares
purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute
diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options and restricted stock awards that result in
lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not
included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an
antidilutive effect in earnings per common share.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, there were 2,530,137 and
2,537,563 weighted average antidilutive stock options outstanding, respectively (September 30,
2009 2,674,505 and 2,770,846). Additionally, the Corporation has outstanding a warrant to
purchase 20,932,836 shares of common stock, which has an antidilutive effect as of September 30,
2010.
64
Note 24 Other Service Fees
The caption of other service fees in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the
following major categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Debit card fees |
|
$ |
27,711 |
|
|
$ |
26,986 |
|
|
$ |
83,480 |
|
|
$ |
80,867 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
24,382 |
|
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
|
|
70,951 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
15,258 |
|
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
43,390 |
|
|
|
40,773 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,855 |
|
|
|
11,463 |
|
|
|
34,929 |
|
|
|
36,014 |
|
Sale and administration of investment products |
|
|
11,379 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
10,237 |
|
|
|
13,849 |
|
|
|
41,585 |
|
|
|
44,775 |
|
|
Total other service fees |
|
$ |
100,822 |
|
|
$ |
97,614 |
|
|
$ |
305,867 |
|
|
$ |
298,584 |
|
|
Note 25 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The Corporation has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (the retirement plans) and
supplementary benefit pension plans for regular employees of certain of its subsidiaries. Effective
May 1, 2009, the accrual of the benefits under the BPPR retirement plan was frozen to all
participants. Pursuant to the amendment, the retirement plan participants will not receive any
additional credit for compensation earned and service performed after April 30, 2009 for purposes
of calculating benefits under the retirement plans.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation amended the pension and postretirement benefits
as a result of the EVERTEC sale. The amendment to the pension plan increased the pension plan
liability by approximately $6.3 million, which will be amortized as pension cost in future periods.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation settled its U.S. retirement plan, which had been
frozen in 2007. The U.S. retirement plan assets are expected to be distributed to plan participants
during the fourth quarter of 2010.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the quarters and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Restoration |
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Plans |
|
Pension Plans |
|
Plans |
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
7,804 |
|
|
$ |
8,041 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
23,710 |
|
|
|
24,630 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(7,655 |
) |
|
|
(6,221 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(23,208 |
) |
|
|
(19,320 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
Amortization of prior service
cost (credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
3,203 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
6,579 |
|
|
|
10,590 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
7,081 |
|
|
$ |
19,274 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
Curtailment loss (gain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
Settlement loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
|
$ |
5,023 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
10,461 |
|
|
$ |
20,094 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation made contributions to the
pension and benefit restoration plans amounting to $23.5 million. The total contributions expected
to be paid during the year 2010 for the pension and benefit restoration plans amount to
approximately $25.8 million.
65
The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of certain
subsidiaries. The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the quarters and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
1,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
(784 |
) |
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
1,485 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
4,455 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
Termination benefit cost |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
5,126 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
|
Contributions made to the postretirement benefit plan for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 amounted to approximately $3.9 million. The total contributions expected to be paid during the
year 2010 for the postretirement benefit plan amount to approximately $5.2 million.
Note 26 Stock-Based Compensation
The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the Stock Option Plan), which permitted the
granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or
non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders
adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which replaced and
superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original
terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.
Stock Option Plan
Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate
in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the
absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock
Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.s common stock at a price equal
to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to
be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The
Corporations policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each
grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement
provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional
20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of
employment due to retirement.
The following table presents information on stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Not in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Remaining Life of |
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
Exercise Price |
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Exercisable |
|
Exercise Price of |
Range per Share |
|
Outstanding |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
In Years |
|
(fully vested) |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
$14.39 - $18.50 |
|
|
1,231,412 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
1,231,412 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
$19.25 - $27.20 |
|
|
1,298,725 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
1,298,725 |
|
|
$ |
25.21 |
|
|
$14.39 - $27.20 |
|
|
2,530,137 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
2,530,137 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding as of September 30, 2010 (September 30,
2009 $0.3 million). There was no intrinsic value of options exercisable as of September 30, 2010
and 2009.
66
The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,965,843 |
|
|
$ |
20.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(59,631 |
) |
|
|
26.42 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(353,549 |
) |
|
|
19.25 |
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,552,663 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(22,526 |
) |
|
|
19.56 |
|
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
2,530,137 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
The stock options exercisable as of September 30, 2010 totaled 2,530,137 (September 30, 2009
2,585,523). There were no stock options exercised during the quarters and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Thus, there was no intrinsic value of options exercised during
the quarters and nine month-periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
There were no new stock option grants issued by the Corporation under the Stock Option Plan during
2009 and 2010.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, there was no stock option expense recognized (September
30, 2009 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $40 thousand). For the nine months ended September
30, 2010, there was no stock option expense recognized (September 30, 2009 $162 thousand, with a
tax benefit of $45 thousand).
Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards,
Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock,
Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board).
Employees and directors of the Corporation and / or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. The shares may be made available from common stock purchased by
the Corporation for such purpose, authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock.
The Corporations policy with respect to the shares of restricted stock has been to purchase such
shares in the open market to cover each grant.
Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based
on the employees continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the
compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong
vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant
and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and
10 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after
attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service.
67
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members
of management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
248,339 |
|
|
$ |
22.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(104,791 |
) |
|
|
21.93 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5,036 |
) |
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
138,512 |
|
|
$ |
23.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,525,416 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(314,284 |
) |
|
|
8.34 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(185,844 |
) |
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
1,163,800 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, no shares of restricted stock were awarded to
management under the Incentive Plan. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, 1,525,416
shares of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which
1,253,551 shares of restricted stock were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of
the TARP Interim Final Rule. The shares of restricted stock, which were awarded to management
consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule, were determined upon consideration
of managements execution of critical 2009 initiatives to manage the Corporations liquidity and
capitalization, strategically reposition its United States operations, and improve management
effectiveness and cost control. The shares will vest on the secondary anniversary of the grant
date, and they may become payable in 25% increments as the Corporation repays each 25% portion of
the aggregate financial assistance received under the United States Treasury Departments Capital
Purchase Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. In addition, the grants
are also subject to further performance criteria as the Corporation must achieve profitability for
at least one fiscal year for awards to be payable. During the quarter and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009, no shares of restricted stock were awarded to management under the Incentive
Plan.
Beginning in 2007, the Corporation authorized the issuance of performance shares, in addition to
restricted shares, under the Incentive Plan. The performance share awards consist of the
opportunity to receive shares of Popular, Inc.s common stock provided that the Corporation
achieves certain performance goals during a three-year performance cycle. The compensation cost
associated with the performance shares is recorded ratably over a three-year performance period.
The performance shares are granted at the end of the three-year period and vest at grant date,
except when the participants employment is terminated by the Corporation without cause. In such
case, the participant would receive a pro-rata amount of shares calculated as if the Corporation
would have met the performance goal for the performance period.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, 41,710
shares have been granted under this plan (September 30, 2009 35,397).
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.6 million of restricted
stock expense related to management incentive awards, with tax benefit of $0.2 million (September
30, 2009 $0.6 million, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million). For the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.7 million of restricted stock expense related to
management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $0.3 million (September 30, 2009 $1.4
million, with a tax benefit of $0.5 million). The fair market value of the restricted stock vested
was $3.2 million at grant date and $0.9 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall, net of
windfalls, of $2.3 million that was recorded as an additional income tax expense at the applicable
income tax rate, net of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance. During the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.3 million of performance shares expense, with a
tax benefit of $0.1 million (September 30, 2009 $0.3 million, with a tax benefit of $107
thousand). During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation recognized $0.5
million of performance share expense, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million (September 30, 2009
$0.6 million, with a tax benefit of $129 thousand). The total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock awards and performance shares to members of management as of
September 30, 2010 was $2.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 3 years.
68
The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for
members of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
Weighted-Average |
(Not in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Non-vested as of January 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
270,515 |
|
|
$ |
2.62 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(270,515 |
) |
|
|
2.62 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
272,828 |
|
|
$ |
2.97 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(272,828 |
) |
|
|
2.97 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation granted 30,434 shares of
restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became
vested at grant date (September 30, 2009 78,070). During this period, the Corporation recognized
$0.1 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax
benefit of $48 thousand (September 30, 2009 $0.1 million, with a tax benefit of $47 thousand).
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation granted 272,828 shares of
restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. and BPPR, which became
vested at grant date (September 30, 2009 251,993). During this period, the Corporation
recognized $0.4 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with
a tax benefit of $0.2 million (September 30, 2009 $0.3 million, with a tax benefit of $141
thousand). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during 2010 for directors
was $0.8 million.
Note 27 Income Taxes
The reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.5 |
|
Additions for tax positions January through March |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Reduction as a result of settlements January through March |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31 |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
Additions for tax positions April through June |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Reduction for tax positions April through June |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30 |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
$ |
42.2 |
|
Additions for tax positions July through September |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Additions for tax positions taken in prior years July through September |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction as a result of lapse of statute of limitations July through September |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reduction for tax positions July through September |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30 |
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, the related accrued interest approximated $6.5 million (September
30, 2009 $6.3 million). Management determined that as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 there was no
need to accrue for the payment of penalties.
After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the
total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico, that if recognized,
would affect the Corporations effective tax rate, was approximately $33.8 million as of September
30, 2010 (September 30, 2009 $45.7 million).
69
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of
September 30, 2010, the following years remain subject to examination in the U.S. Federal
jurisdiction: 2008 and thereafter; and in the Puerto Rico jurisdiction, 2006 and thereafter. During
2010, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed an examination of the Corporations U.S.
operations tax return for 2007, and as a result, the Corporation recognized a tax benefit of $14.3
million during the first quarter of 2010.
The Corporation does not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits within the next 12 months.
The following table presents the components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits available for carryforward |
|
$ |
8,310 |
|
|
$ |
11,026 |
|
Net operating loss and donation carryforward available |
|
|
972,397 |
|
|
|
843,968 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
95,621 |
|
|
|
103,979 |
|
Deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
7,797 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
533,611 |
|
|
|
536,277 |
|
Deferred gains |
|
|
13,163 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
Accelerated depreciation |
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
Intercompany deferred gains |
|
|
4,818 |
|
|
|
7,015 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
20,969 |
|
|
|
39,096 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
1,659,015 |
|
|
$ |
1,565,699 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences between assigned values and the tax basis of the
assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations |
|
$ |
63,977 |
|
|
$ |
25,896 |
|
Difference in outside basis between financial and tax reporting on
sale of a business |
|
|
11,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
8,280 |
|
|
|
9,708 |
|
Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities |
|
|
56,954 |
|
|
|
30,323 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
141,463 |
|
|
$ |
71,850 |
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets less liabilities |
|
$ |
1,517,552 |
|
|
$ |
1,493,849 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance |
|
|
1,191,951 |
|
|
|
1,129,882 |
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
325,601 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above as of September 30, 2010 is reflected in
the consolidated statement of condition as $336.7 million in deferred tax assets (in the other
assets caption) and $11.1 million in deferred tax liabilities (in the other liabilities
caption), reflecting the aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying
subsidiaries of the Corporation.
A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all
available evidence; it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or
the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to
reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available
evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets,
including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of
sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The
analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset,
including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary
70
differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards,
taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.
The Corporations U.S. mainland operations are in a cumulative loss position for the three-year
period ended September 30, 2010. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax
assets in the U.S. mainland, this cumulative taxable loss position is considered significant
negative evidence and has caused management to conclude that the Corporation will not be able to
realize the associated deferred tax assets in the future. As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation
recorded a valuation allowance of $1.2 billion on the deferred tax asset of its U.S. operations. As
of September 30, 2010, the Corporations deferred tax assets (net of deferred tax liability)
related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $345.8 million and the deferred tax liability,
net of the valuation allowance, of its U.S. operations amounted to $20.2 million. The Corporation
assessed the realization of the Puerto Rico portion of the net deferred tax asset and based on the
weighting of all available evidence has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net
deferred tax assets will be realized.
Note 28 Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Additional disclosures on non-cash activities for the nine-month period are listed in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate |
|
$ |
147,577 |
|
|
$ |
116,200 |
|
Loans transferred to other property |
|
|
28,785 |
|
|
|
29,331 |
|
|
Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
|
176,362 |
|
|
|
145,531 |
|
Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale |
|
|
24,458 |
|
|
|
32,270 |
|
Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
9,679 |
|
|
|
175,043 |
|
Loans securitized into investment securities [a] |
|
|
633,821 |
|
|
|
1,112,061 |
|
Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers |
|
|
11,909 |
|
|
|
19,640 |
|
Treasury stock retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,139 |
|
Change in par value of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689,389 |
|
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock converted |
|
|
(1,150,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
1,341,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities exchanged for new common stock issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities exchanged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397,911 |
) |
New common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,652 |
|
Preferred stock exchanged for new common stock issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged (Series A and B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524,079 |
) |
New common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,691 |
|
Preferred stock exchanged for new trust preferred securities issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock exchanged (Series C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(901,165 |
) |
New trust preferred securities issued (junior subordinated debentures) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,885 |
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Includes loans securitized into investment securities and subsequently sold before quarter end. |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 the changes in operating assets and liabilities
included in the reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities, as well
as the changes in assets and liabilities presented in the investing and financing sections are net
of the effect of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Refer to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition and
balances of the assets and liabilities recorded at fair value by the Corporation on April 30, 2010.
The cash received in the transaction, which amounted to $261 million, is presented in the investing
activities section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as Cash received from acquisition.
Note 29 Segment Reporting
The Corporations corporate structure consists of two reportable segments Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America.
71
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on September 30, 2010, the
Corporation completed the sale of a 51% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which included the merchant
acquiring business of BPPR. EVERTEC was reported as a reportable segment prior to September 30,
2010, while the merchant acquiring business was originally included in the BPPR reportable segment
through June 30, 2010. As a result of the sale, the Corporation no longer presents EVERTEC as a
reportable segment and therefore, historical financial information for the processing and merchant
acquiring businesses has been reclassified under Corporate group for all periods presented.
Additionally, the Corporation retained EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A. and its equity investments in
CONTADO and Serfinsa, which were included in the EVERTEC reportable segment through June 30, 2010,
and are now also included in the Corporate group for all periods presented. Revenue from the
remaining ownership interest in EVERTEC will be prospectively reported as non-interest income in
the Corporate group.
Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate
performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the
organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on
the products and services offered by the segments.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:
Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporations
results of operations and total assets as of September 30, 2010, additional disclosures are
provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:
|
|
Commercial banking represents the Corporations banking operations conducted at BPPR, which
are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the
lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR
allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market
rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well
as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on
retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the
lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and
lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally in residential mortgage loan
originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the
investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the
investment function of BPPR. |
|
|
Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the
brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency
and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk
Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries
generate profits based on fee income. |
Banco Popular North America:
Banco Popular North Americas reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA,
E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through
a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland, while E-LOAN supports BPNAs deposit gathering
through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this
subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment
and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.
The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North
America and Popular International Bank, including the equity investments in CONTADO and Serfinsa.
Also, as discussed previously, it includes the results of EVERTEC for all periods presented. The
Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as
critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the
Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates,
resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.
72
The results of operations included in the tables below for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
exclude the results of operations of the discontinued business of PFH. Segment assets as of
September 30, 2009 also exclude the assets of the discontinued operations.
2010
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
336,580 |
|
|
$ |
77,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
414,045 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
182,153 |
|
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
92,937 |
|
|
|
13,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,098 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,184 |
|
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
210,264 |
|
|
|
58,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,288 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12,996 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,794 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,546 |
|
|
|
($14,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($2,076 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
31,129,147 |
|
|
$ |
9,328,402 |
|
|
|
($34,485 |
) |
|
$ |
40,423,064 |
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($27,289 |
) |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
386,918 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
730,583 |
|
|
|
(40,157 |
) |
|
|
796,524 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,325 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,448 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
99,399 |
|
|
|
(40,324 |
) |
|
|
327,363 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
87,382 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
496,453 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
5,580,042 |
|
|
|
($5,182,390 |
) |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
787,923 |
|
|
$ |
231,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,019,565 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
412,792 |
|
|
|
244,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
327,920 |
|
|
|
45,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,566 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,870 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,371 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
29,097 |
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,138 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,676 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
584,283 |
|
|
|
186,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
770,858 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
26,304 |
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,686 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
58,546 |
|
|
|
($176,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($118,069 |
) |
|
73
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($85,241 |
) |
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
934,811 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
905,146 |
|
|
|
(108,464 |
) |
|
|
1,170,248 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,084 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,426 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
237,082 |
|
|
|
(107,489 |
) |
|
|
900,451 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
82,983 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
472,600 |
|
|
|
($920 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
217,750 |
|
|
$ |
77,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
295,338 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
153,350 |
|
|
|
177,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
109,083 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,478 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,995 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
175,412 |
|
|
|
70,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,457 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($13,547 |
) |
|
|
($169,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($183,464 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
23,868,954 |
|
|
$ |
11,443,083 |
|
|
|
($29,284 |
) |
|
$ |
35,282,753 |
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($19,232 |
) |
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
83,201 |
|
|
|
(38,635 |
) |
|
|
160,044 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,430 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(78,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
69,767 |
|
|
|
(33,129 |
) |
|
|
282,095 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
65,929 |
|
|
|
($4,026 |
) |
|
|
($121,561 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
5,523,711 |
|
|
|
($5,168,660 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
74
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular de |
|
Banco Popular |
|
Intersegment |
|
Reportable |
(In thousands) |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
North America |
|
Eliminations |
|
Segments |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
650,679 |
|
|
$ |
234,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
885,608 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
486,343 |
|
|
|
566,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
562,466 |
|
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578,358 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,600 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
28,463 |
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
|
|
($22 |
) |
|
|
36,699 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
530,174 |
|
|
|
236,453 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
766,622 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(5,692 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(9,920 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
167,580 |
|
|
|
($557,622 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
($390,026 |
) |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
($54,489 |
) |
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
246,245 |
|
|
|
(103,989 |
) |
|
|
720,614 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
12,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(78,337 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
210,136 |
|
|
|
(98,263 |
) |
|
|
878,495 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(6,120 |
) |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
53,125 |
|
|
|
($3,819 |
) |
|
|
($340,720 |
) |
|
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment
are as follows:
2010
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
164,890 |
|
|
$ |
169,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,240 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
336,580 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
155,561 |
|
|
|
26,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,153 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
65,951 |
|
|
|
26,321 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
92,937 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
5,245 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,024 |
|
Gain on early
extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
71,588 |
|
|
|
121,229 |
|
|
|
17,543 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
210,264 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(25,120 |
) |
|
|
33,993 |
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
12,996 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($40,881 |
) |
|
$ |
47,049 |
|
|
$ |
6,417 |
|
|
|
($39 |
) |
|
$ |
12,546 |
|
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
16,242,839 |
|
|
$ |
22,081,935 |
|
|
$ |
974,816 |
|
|
|
($8,170,443 |
) |
|
$ |
31,129,147 |
|
|
75
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
309,391 |
|
|
$ |
471,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,130 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
787,923 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
306,278 |
|
|
|
106,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,792 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
78,922 |
|
|
|
174,319 |
|
|
|
74,796 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
327,920 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,870 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
12,525 |
|
|
|
15,668 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,097 |
|
Loss on early
extinguishment of debt |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
189,590 |
|
|
|
346,553 |
|
|
|
48,377 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
584,283 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(49,300 |
) |
|
|
63,435 |
|
|
|
12,055 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
26,304 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($72,109 |
) |
|
$ |
110,298 |
|
|
$ |
20,170 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
58,546 |
|
|
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
77,277 |
|
|
$ |
137,340 |
|
|
$ |
3,010 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
217,750 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
98,536 |
|
|
|
54,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,350 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
26,565 |
|
|
|
55,468 |
|
|
|
27,049 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
109,083 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,316 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
51,928 |
|
|
|
107,151 |
|
|
|
16,405 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
175,412 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(20,892 |
) |
|
|
15,970 |
|
|
|
4,919 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($30,498 |
) |
|
$ |
8,572 |
|
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
($13,547 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
10,111,972 |
|
|
$ |
17,189,724 |
|
|
$ |
513,411 |
|
|
|
($3,946,153 |
) |
|
$ |
23,868,954 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Banco |
|
|
Commercial |
|
Consumer and |
|
Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
Popular de |
(In thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Retail Banking |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
225,595 |
|
|
$ |
415,427 |
|
|
$ |
9,195 |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
|
$ |
650,679 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
316,005 |
|
|
|
170,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486,343 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
131,192 |
|
|
|
357,404 |
|
|
|
74,313 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
562,466 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
12,518 |
|
|
|
14,993 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,463 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
155,500 |
|
|
|
327,486 |
|
|
|
47,393 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
530,174 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(77,061 |
) |
|
|
60,739 |
|
|
|
11,986 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($51,261 |
) |
|
$ |
196,085 |
|
|
$ |
22,629 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
167,580 |
|
|
76
Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segment are
as follows:
2010
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
76,166 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,465 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
42,637 |
|
|
|
(9,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,860 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
16,703 |
|
|
|
(3,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,161 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,725 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
56,458 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,024 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
($17,830 |
) |
|
$ |
3,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($14,622 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
9,985,407 |
|
|
$ |
486,850 |
|
|
|
($1,143,855 |
) |
|
$ |
9,328,402 |
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
228,206 |
|
|
$ |
3,492 |
|
|
|
($56 |
) |
|
$ |
231,642 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
228,628 |
|
|
|
16,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,679 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
55,770 |
|
|
|
(10,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,646 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
9,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,725 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
181,526 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186,575 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($145,540 |
) |
|
|
($31,019 |
) |
|
|
($56 |
) |
|
|
($176,615 |
) |
|
2009
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
76,833 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
77,588 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
143,879 |
|
|
|
33,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,713 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
16,573 |
|
|
|
(10,129 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
910 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,679 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
67,743 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,045 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($122,298 |
) |
|
|
($47,843 |
) |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
($169,917 |
) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
$ |
12,076,358 |
|
|
$ |
626,462 |
|
|
|
($1,259,737 |
) |
|
$ |
11,443,083 |
|
|
77
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Banco Popular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular |
(In thousands) |
|
North America |
|
E-LOAN |
|
Eliminations |
|
North America |
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
226,564 |
|
|
$ |
7,453 |
|
|
$ |
912 |
|
|
$ |
234,929 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
462,254 |
|
|
|
104,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566,693 |
|
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
43,376 |
|
|
|
(27,397 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
15,892 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
7,359 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
221,011 |
|
|
|
15,440 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
236,453 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(5,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,692 |
) |
|
Net loss |
|
|
($423,578 |
) |
|
|
($134,867 |
) |
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
|
($557,622 |
) |
|
A breakdown of revenues and selected balance sheet information by geographical area follows:
Geographic
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Revenues [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
$ |
1,074,833 |
|
|
$ |
331,364 |
|
|
$ |
1,761,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,244,649 |
|
United States |
|
|
85,225 |
|
|
|
79,782 |
|
|
|
262,197 |
|
|
|
208,780 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,384 |
|
|
|
25,287 |
|
|
|
80,950 |
|
|
|
99,120 |
|
|
Total consolidated
revenues from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,183,442 |
|
|
$ |
436,433 |
|
|
$ |
2,105,059 |
|
|
$ |
1,552,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Total revenues include net interest income, service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of
investment securities, trading account profit (loss), gain (loss) on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, FDIC loss share income
(expense), fair value change in equity appreciation instrument, gain
on sale of processing and technology business and other operating income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Selected Balance Sheet Information: [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
30,214,685 |
|
|
$ |
22,480,832 |
|
|
$ |
22,802,274 |
|
Loans |
|
|
17,924,662 |
|
|
|
14,176,793 |
|
|
|
14,537,544 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
19,886,771 |
|
|
|
16,634,123 |
|
|
|
16,570,569 |
|
Mainland United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,466,115 |
|
|
$ |
11,033,114 |
|
|
$ |
11,669,207 |
|
Loans |
|
|
7,586,414 |
|
|
|
8,825,559 |
|
|
|
9,156,724 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
6,807,054 |
|
|
|
8,242,604 |
|
|
|
8,792,328 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,139,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,222,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,323 |
|
Loans |
|
|
752,721 |
|
|
|
801,557 |
|
|
|
777,248 |
|
Deposits [2] |
|
|
1,046,219 |
|
|
|
1,048,167 |
|
|
|
1,020,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Does not include balance sheet information of the discontinued operations for the period ended September 30, 2009. |
|
[2] |
|
Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. |
78
Note 30 Subsequent Events
Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized
in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent
to September 30, 2010. Such evaluation resulted in no adjustments or additional disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Note 31 Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered
Guaranteed Securities
The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of
Popular, Inc. Holding Company (PIHC) (parent only), Popular International Bank, Inc. (PIBI),
Popular North America, Inc. (PNA), and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation as of September
30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, and the results of their operations and cash
flows for periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
PIBI is an operating subsidiary of PIHC and, as of September 30, 2010, is the holding company of
its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Popular Insurance V.I., Inc.; EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A.; and PNA.
Prior to the internal reorganization and sale of the ownership interest in EVERTEC discussed in
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, ATH Costa Rica S.A., and T.I.I. Smart Solutions
Inc. were also wholly-owned subsidiaries of PIBI.
PNA is an operating subsidiary of PIBI and is the holding company of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries:
|
|
|
Equity One, Inc.; and |
|
|
|
|
Banco Popular North America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular
Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc. |
PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.
The principal source of income for the PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR. As members subject to
the regulations of the Federal Reserve System, BPPR and BPNA must obtain the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board for any dividend if the total of all dividends declared by each entity
during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the
Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any
required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. The payment
of dividends by BPPR may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as
the maintenance of certain minimum capital levels. As of September 30, 2010, BPPR could have
declared a dividend of approximately $100 million (September 30, 2009 $56 million) without the
approval of the Federal Reserve Board. As of December 31, 2009, BPPR was required to obtain the
approval of the Federal Reserve Board to declare a dividend. As of September 30, 2010, December
31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, BPNA was required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve
Board to declare a dividend. The Corporation has never received dividend payments from its U.S.
subsidiaries. Refer to Popular, Inc.s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for further
information on dividend restrictions imposed by regulatory requirements and policies on the
payment of dividends by BPPR and BPNA.
79
POPULAR,
INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,652 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
580,530 |
|
|
|
($2,473 |
) |
|
$ |
580,811 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
164,852 |
|
|
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
2,023,840 |
|
|
|
(170,956 |
) |
|
|
2,023,949 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,192 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,721,445 |
|
|
|
(18,449 |
) |
|
|
5,741,483 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
210,812 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,340 |
|
|
|
(185,000 |
) |
|
|
214,152 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
142,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,309 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,868,350 |
|
|
|
1,033,087 |
|
|
|
1,507,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,408,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,088 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with FDIC |
|
|
590,826 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,212,059 |
|
|
|
(555,234 |
) |
|
|
22,249,167 |
|
Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,685 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,243,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,243,994 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
590,766 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,867,667 |
|
|
|
(555,234 |
) |
|
|
24,904,715 |
|
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,308,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,308,959 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
528,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,849 |
|
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with
the FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,823 |
|
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the
FDIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,516 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
160,016 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
160,167 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,947 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
208,317 |
|
|
|
81,142 |
|
|
|
15,533 |
|
|
|
1,179,288 |
|
|
|
(24,295 |
) |
|
|
1,459,985 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,333 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,438 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,094,408 |
|
|
$ |
1,126,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,528,768 |
|
|
$ |
40,436,485 |
|
|
|
($7,365,461 |
) |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,397,313 |
|
|
|
($25,874 |
) |
|
$ |
5,371,439 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,374,886 |
|
|
|
(6,281 |
) |
|
|
22,368,605 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,772,199 |
|
|
|
(32,155 |
) |
|
|
27,740,044 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,522,939 |
|
|
|
(164,800 |
) |
|
|
2,358,139 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,200 |
|
|
|
691,342 |
|
|
|
(525,200 |
) |
|
|
191,342 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
$ |
830,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,052 |
|
|
|
3,884,718 |
|
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
5,143,388 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
(185,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
155,074 |
|
|
$ |
3,183 |
|
|
|
45,886 |
|
|
|
1,121,902 |
|
|
|
(47,442 |
) |
|
|
1,278,603 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
985,208 |
|
|
|
3,183 |
|
|
|
501,138 |
|
|
|
36,178,100 |
|
|
|
(956,113 |
) |
|
|
36,711,516 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
10,229 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
51,633 |
|
|
|
(55,701 |
) |
|
|
10,229 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
4,085,775 |
|
|
|
3,908,157 |
|
|
|
3,816,208 |
|
|
|
5,612,091 |
|
|
|
(13,327,929 |
) |
|
|
4,094,302 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(122,281 |
) |
|
|
(2,786,574 |
) |
|
|
(2,821,556 |
) |
|
|
(1,526,865 |
) |
|
|
7,126,468 |
|
|
|
(130,808 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
85,862 |
|
|
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
|
32,976 |
|
|
|
121,526 |
|
|
|
(152,186 |
) |
|
|
85,862 |
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
4,109,200 |
|
|
|
1,123,333 |
|
|
|
1,027,630 |
|
|
|
4,258,385 |
|
|
|
(6,409,348 |
) |
|
|
4,109,200 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,094,408 |
|
|
$ |
1,126,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,528,768 |
|
|
$ |
40,436,485 |
|
|
|
($7,365,461 |
) |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
80
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
and |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
677,606 |
|
|
|
($2,488 |
) |
|
$ |
677,330 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
56,144 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
1,002,702 |
|
|
|
(56,338 |
) |
|
|
1,002,797 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,436 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,694,053 |
|
|
|
(1,787 |
) |
|
|
6,694,714 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
455,777 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,935 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
212,962 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or
realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
148,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,149 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,046,342 |
|
|
|
733,737 |
|
|
|
1,156,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,936,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,796 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
109,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,844,455 |
|
|
|
(126,824 |
) |
|
|
23,827,263 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,150 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261,204 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
109,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,469,161 |
|
|
|
(126,824 |
) |
|
|
22,451,909 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
581,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,853 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
125,857 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
126,080 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,747 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
33,828 |
|
|
|
73,308 |
|
|
|
21,162 |
|
|
|
1,244,857 |
|
|
|
(48,238 |
) |
|
|
1,324,917 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,349 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,803 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,661,249 |
|
|
$ |
867,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,183,567 |
|
|
$ |
34,626,784 |
|
|
|
($5,602,590 |
) |
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,497,730 |
|
|
|
($2,429 |
) |
|
$ |
4,495,301 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,485,931 |
|
|
|
(56,338 |
) |
|
|
21,429,593 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,983,661 |
|
|
|
(58,767 |
) |
|
|
25,924,894 |
|
Assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632,790 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
24,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
107,226 |
|
|
|
(124,825 |
) |
|
|
7,326 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
1,064,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,846 |
|
|
|
1,152,324 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
2,648,632 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
33,745 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
45,547 |
|
|
|
954,525 |
|
|
|
(49,991 |
) |
|
|
983,866 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,122,432 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
480,093 |
|
|
|
31,260,526 |
|
|
|
(665,583 |
) |
|
|
32,197,508 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,797,328 |
|
|
|
3,437,437 |
|
|
|
3,321,208 |
|
|
|
4,637,181 |
|
|
|
(11,388,916 |
) |
|
|
2,804,238 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(285,842 |
) |
|
|
(2,541,802 |
) |
|
|
(2,627,520 |
) |
|
|
(1,329,311 |
) |
|
|
6,491,723 |
|
|
|
(292,752 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
|
(32,321 |
) |
|
|
9,784 |
|
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
16,471 |
|
|
|
(29,209 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
|
867,275 |
|
|
|
703,474 |
|
|
|
3,366,258 |
|
|
|
(4,937,007 |
) |
|
|
2,538,817 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,661,249 |
|
|
$ |
867,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,183,567 |
|
|
$ |
34,626,784 |
|
|
|
($5,602,590 |
) |
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
|
81
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CONDITION
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
7,688 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
607,134 |
|
|
|
($9,300 |
) |
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
10,050 |
|
|
|
47,439 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
1,098,734 |
|
|
|
(57,811 |
) |
|
|
1,098,823 |
|
Trading account securities, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446,368 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,991,597 |
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
6,993,291 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
|
|
455,769 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,931 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
212,950 |
|
Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
159,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,943 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
3,182,664 |
|
|
|
782,962 |
|
|
|
1,195,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,161,555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,447 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
171,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
24,528,725 |
|
|
|
(192,265 |
) |
|
|
24,512,966 |
|
Less Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,897 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207,401 |
|
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio, net |
|
|
171,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
23,204,487 |
|
|
|
(192,265 |
) |
|
|
23,188,668 |
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
586,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589,592 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,485 |
|
Accrued income receivable |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
131,568 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
131,745 |
|
Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,335 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
42,384 |
|
|
|
70,624 |
|
|
|
20,336 |
|
|
|
1,053,602 |
|
|
|
(30,225 |
) |
|
|
1,156,721 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606,508 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,067 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,878,366 |
|
|
$ |
913,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,326 |
|
|
$ |
35,502,628 |
|
|
|
($5,883,301 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,291,058 |
|
|
|
($9,241 |
) |
|
$ |
4,281,817 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,158,892 |
|
|
|
(57,811 |
) |
|
|
22,101,081 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,449,950 |
|
|
|
(67,052 |
) |
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,807,891 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
26,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,127 |
|
|
|
(190,265 |
) |
|
|
3,077 |
|
Notes payable at cost |
|
|
1,059,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
434,277 |
|
|
|
1,157,899 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
2,649,821 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,000 |
|
|
|
(430,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
50,050 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
37,878 |
|
|
|
996,043 |
|
|
|
(32,388 |
) |
|
|
1,051,661 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,135,910 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
472,155 |
|
|
|
32,008,910 |
|
|
|
(721,705 |
) |
|
|
32,895,348 |
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
50,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,160 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52,322 |
|
|
|
(56,285 |
) |
|
|
6,395 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
2,787,750 |
|
|
|
3,292,438 |
|
|
|
3,176,208 |
|
|
|
4,495,509 |
|
|
|
(10,957,245 |
) |
|
|
2,794,660 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(62,615 |
) |
|
|
(2,353,525 |
) |
|
|
(2,435,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,062,519 |
) |
|
|
5,844,196 |
|
|
|
(69,525 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax |
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
|
(29,167 |
) |
|
|
13,023 |
|
|
|
8,406 |
|
|
|
7,738 |
|
|
|
(39,223 |
) |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
|
913,707 |
|
|
|
754,171 |
|
|
|
3,493,718 |
|
|
|
(5,161,596 |
) |
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,878,366 |
|
|
$ |
913,785 |
|
|
$ |
1,226,326 |
|
|
$ |
35,502,628 |
|
|
|
($5,883,301 |
) |
|
$ |
35,637,804 |
|
|
82
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
80,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($80,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
484,729 |
|
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
$ |
484,883 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,391 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
5,673 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
56,848 |
|
|
|
(5,332 |
) |
|
|
57,277 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
|
87,592 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
550,104 |
|
|
|
(87,112 |
) |
|
|
550,687 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,346 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
86,330 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
15,816 |
|
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
14,945 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
26,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,635 |
|
|
|
33,868 |
|
|
|
(5,494 |
) |
|
|
62,494 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
26,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,820 |
|
|
|
136,030 |
|
|
|
(6,574 |
) |
|
|
163,769 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
61,099 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(7,739 |
) |
|
|
414,074 |
|
|
|
(80,538 |
) |
|
|
386,918 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
61,099 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(7,739 |
) |
|
|
199,061 |
|
|
|
(80,538 |
) |
|
|
171,905 |
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,608 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,029 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
100,822 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves,
and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,936 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,641 |
|
Gain on sale of processing and technology business |
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
Other operating (loss) income |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
25,772 |
|
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
24,568 |
|
|
Total non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
640,784 |
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
156,133 |
|
|
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
|
796,524 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,426 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,205 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,425 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,432 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,872 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
19,151 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
29,645 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
48,224 |
|
Communications |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,514 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,260 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,876 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,183 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,448 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(2,926 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
49,024 |
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
45,697 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
37,798 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
334,600 |
|
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
371,547 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
664,085 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
(10,022 |
) |
|
|
20,594 |
|
|
|
(81,148 |
) |
|
|
596,882 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
84,664 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
579,421 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
(9,725 |
) |
|
|
4,099 |
|
|
|
(81,339 |
) |
|
|
494,494 |
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(84,927 |
) |
|
|
(24,235 |
) |
|
|
(14,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($22,197 |
) |
|
|
($24,055 |
) |
|
$ |
4,099 |
|
|
$ |
42,153 |
|
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
83
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($22,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
371,173 |
|
|
|
(1,804 |
) |
|
$ |
371,366 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
1,510 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
8,469 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
72,613 |
|
|
|
(6,908 |
) |
|
|
74,360 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
|
10,478 |
|
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
15,177 |
|
|
|
452,524 |
|
|
|
(31,558 |
) |
|
|
454,463 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,280 |
|
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
118,941 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17,892 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
16,142 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
19,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
19,757 |
|
|
|
(7,207 |
) |
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
19,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,539 |
|
|
|
156,929 |
|
|
|
(9,339 |
) |
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
Net interest (expense) income |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
295,595 |
|
|
|
(22,219 |
) |
|
|
276,389 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
(35,468 |
) |
|
|
(22,219 |
) |
|
|
(54,674 |
) |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,240 |
|
|
|
(3,626 |
) |
|
|
97,614 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
(3,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,485 |
) |
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
Loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
Other operating (loss) income |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
162,285 |
|
|
|
(8,234 |
) |
|
|
160,044 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,190 |
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
102,822 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,629 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
8,652 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,819 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
130,547 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,983 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,109 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25,868 |
|
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
|
|
28,694 |
|
Communications |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,902 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(41,604 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(51,786 |
) |
|
|
125,664 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
31,753 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(25,870 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(51,778 |
) |
|
|
302,814 |
|
|
|
(4,576 |
) |
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
18,454 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
59,492 |
|
|
|
(175,997 |
) |
|
|
(25,877 |
) |
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
5,303 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
18,104 |
|
|
|
8,681 |
|
|
|
59,524 |
|
|
|
(181,300 |
) |
|
|
(26,570 |
) |
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(139,665 |
) |
|
|
(135,566 |
) |
|
|
(188,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
(126,885 |
) |
|
|
(128,710 |
) |
|
|
(181,300 |
) |
|
|
436,895 |
|
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
|
($130,312 |
) |
|
|
($132,137 |
) |
|
|
($184,727 |
) |
|
$ |
447,176 |
|
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
84
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
168,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($175,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,224,330 |
|
|
|
(3,785 |
) |
|
$ |
1,224,846 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
4,326 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
4,326 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
19,113 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
183,761 |
|
|
|
(18,022 |
) |
|
|
185,118 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,313 |
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
|
191,566 |
|
|
|
7,761 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,432,730 |
|
|
|
(197,697 |
) |
|
|
1,434,603 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,157 |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
269,919 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
49,225 |
|
|
|
(3,822 |
) |
|
|
45,756 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
86,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,960 |
|
|
|
93,450 |
|
|
|
(18,524 |
) |
|
|
184,117 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
86,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,267 |
|
|
|
412,832 |
|
|
|
(22,584 |
) |
|
|
499,792 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
105,289 |
|
|
|
7,761 |
|
|
|
(23,024 |
) |
|
|
1,019,898 |
|
|
|
(175,113 |
) |
|
|
934,811 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
105,289 |
|
|
|
7,761 |
|
|
|
(23,024 |
) |
|
|
362,427 |
|
|
|
(175,113 |
) |
|
|
277,340 |
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,865 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,677 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
305,867 |
|
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments to indemnity reserves,
and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,106 |
) |
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,602 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,035 |
|
Gain on sale of processing and technology business |
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
14,931 |
|
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
54,199 |
|
|
|
(3,612 |
) |
|
|
63,076 |
|
|
Total non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
642,000 |
|
|
|
14,931 |
|
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
522,379 |
|
|
|
(5,422 |
) |
|
|
1,170,248 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
13,806 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,716 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
321,423 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,451 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
78,746 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
16,080 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,167 |
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
400,169 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
84,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,359 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,231 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,635 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
26,103 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
85,194 |
|
|
|
(1,818 |
) |
|
|
109,498 |
|
Communications |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
31,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,628 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,759 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,898 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,894 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,426 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(26,014 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
146,812 |
|
|
|
(1,359 |
) |
|
|
119,464 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
38,581 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
945,451 |
|
|
|
(3,576 |
) |
|
|
980,876 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
708,708 |
|
|
|
22,617 |
|
|
|
(27,009 |
) |
|
|
(60,645 |
) |
|
|
(176,959 |
) |
|
|
466,712 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
83,025 |
|
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
26,864 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
|
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
625,683 |
|
|
|
19,481 |
|
|
|
(26,712 |
) |
|
|
(87,509 |
) |
|
|
(177,332 |
) |
|
|
353,611 |
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(272,072 |
) |
|
|
(200,353 |
) |
|
|
(167,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
639,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($180,872 |
) |
|
|
($194,036 |
) |
|
|
($87,509 |
) |
|
$ |
462,417 |
|
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
85
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from subsidiaries |
|
$ |
73,625 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($96,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
7,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
$ |
1,154,719 |
|
|
|
(7,138 |
) |
|
$ |
1,155,378 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
7,026 |
|
|
|
(3,186 |
) |
|
|
7,024 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
29,943 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
213,976 |
|
|
|
(20,939 |
) |
|
|
223,661 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,638 |
|
|
Total interest and dividend income |
|
|
111,429 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
17,819 |
|
|
|
1,404,359 |
|
|
|
(127,388 |
) |
|
|
1,414,701 |
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,515 |
|
|
|
(3,083 |
) |
|
|
395,432 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
60,496 |
|
|
|
(7,187 |
) |
|
|
53,476 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
45,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,880 |
|
|
|
58,919 |
|
|
|
(21,808 |
) |
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
45,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,922 |
|
|
|
517,930 |
|
|
|
(32,078 |
) |
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
65,437 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
(33,103 |
) |
|
|
886,429 |
|
|
|
(95,310 |
) |
|
|
831,935 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after provision for loan losses |
|
|
65,437 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
(33,103 |
) |
|
|
(166,607 |
) |
|
|
(95,310 |
) |
|
|
(221,101 |
) |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,412 |
|
Other service fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,544 |
|
|
|
(5,960 |
) |
|
|
298,584 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment
securities |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
(10,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,005 |
|
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
|
|
220,792 |
|
Trading account profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
Loss on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans
held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
Other operating income (loss) |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
12,799 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
35,197 |
|
|
|
(3,670 |
) |
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
Total non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
2,636 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
726,405 |
|
|
|
(11,688 |
) |
|
|
720,614 |
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
18,255 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,691 |
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
315,224 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,394 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
24,659 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,085 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
412,044 |
|
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
78,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
73,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,289 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,369 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
73,547 |
|
|
|
(3,881 |
) |
|
|
80,643 |
|
Communications |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
35,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,115 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,761 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,381 |
) |
|
|
(1,923 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(65,059 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(51,768 |
) |
|
|
223,341 |
|
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
|
|
104,955 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
(20,865 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(51,803 |
) |
|
|
936,126 |
|
|
|
(8,081 |
) |
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax and equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
89,986 |
|
|
|
11,053 |
|
|
|
18,277 |
|
|
|
(376,328 |
) |
|
|
(98,917 |
) |
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(15,611 |
) |
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before equity in losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
90,862 |
|
|
|
11,007 |
|
|
|
17,953 |
|
|
|
(360,717 |
) |
|
|
(99,825 |
) |
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
(431,582 |
) |
|
|
(547,385 |
) |
|
|
(567,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
|
|
(536,378 |
) |
|
|
(549,671 |
) |
|
|
(360,717 |
) |
|
|
1,446,766 |
|
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
|
($556,350 |
) |
|
|
($569,643 |
) |
|
|
($380,689 |
) |
|
$ |
1,506,682 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
86
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($180,872 |
) |
|
|
($194,036 |
) |
|
|
($87,509 |
) |
|
$ |
462,417 |
|
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
272,072 |
|
|
|
200,353 |
|
|
|
167,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(639,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and
equipment |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
46,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,084 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,471 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
Fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing
rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,959 |
|
Net amortization of premiums and deferred
fees (accretion
of discounts) |
|
|
15,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(165,932 |
) |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(150,577 |
) |
Net gain on sale and valuation adjustment of
investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,210 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation
instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,035 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,035 |
) |
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,602 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,106 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,426 |
|
Gain on sale of processing and technology
businesses, net of transaction costs |
|
|
(616,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(616,186 |
) |
(Earnings) losses from investments under the
equity method |
|
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
|
(14,931 |
) |
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
|
|
(16,144 |
) |
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
11,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,363 |
) |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(494,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(494,312 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213,897 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,831 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565,611 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in accrued income
receivable |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
1,806 |
|
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
2,918 |
|
|
|
5,669 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
19,999 |
|
|
|
(25,052 |
) |
|
|
5,521 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in interest payable |
|
|
(3,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
(32,951 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(34,559 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit
obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
52,804 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
39,235 |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
95,902 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(250,035 |
) |
|
|
194,353 |
|
|
|
173,600 |
|
|
|
502,403 |
|
|
|
(661,717 |
) |
|
|
(41,396 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities |
|
|
103,576 |
|
|
|
13,481 |
|
|
|
(20,436 |
) |
|
|
414,894 |
|
|
|
(199,300 |
) |
|
|
312,215 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in money market
investments |
|
|
(164,801 |
) |
|
|
50,237 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(924,899 |
) |
|
|
114,618 |
|
|
|
(924,913 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(34,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(671,328 |
) |
|
|
17,150 |
|
|
|
(688,678 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(26,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,198 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,021 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329,390 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
271,928 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,889 |
|
|
|
(245,000 |
) |
|
|
51,067 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,470 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,676 |
|
Net (disbursements) repayments on loans |
|
|
(481,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347,236 |
|
|
|
426,893 |
|
|
|
1,292,935 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,908 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,488 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(1,095,000 |
) |
|
|
(495,000 |
) |
|
|
(495,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,085,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,311 |
|
Net proceeds from sale of processing and
technology businesses |
|
|
617,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,322 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,336 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,503 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,412 |
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities |
|
|
(913,206 |
) |
|
|
(444,513 |
) |
|
|
(495,068 |
) |
|
|
1,804,888 |
|
|
|
2,398,661 |
|
|
|
2,350,762 |
|
|
87
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CONTINUED
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(601,350 |
) |
|
|
26,611 |
|
|
|
(574,739 |
) |
Net decrease in assets sold under
agreements to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109,851 |
) |
|
|
(164,800 |
) |
|
|
(274,651 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in other
short-term borrowings |
|
|
(24,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
|
584,116 |
|
|
|
(400,375 |
) |
|
|
184,016 |
|
Payments of notes payable and
subordinated notes |
|
|
(250,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,274,449 |
) |
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
(3,281,449 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,101 |
|
Prepayment penalties paid on
cancellation of debt |
|
|
(15,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,475 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of
depository shares |
|
|
1,100,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
1,102,231 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111,700 |
) |
|
|
175,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(530 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
1,095,000 |
|
|
|
(2,085,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
810,108 |
|
|
|
431,100 |
|
|
|
515,500 |
|
|
|
(2,316,858 |
) |
|
|
(2,199,346 |
) |
|
|
(2,759,496 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due
from banks |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(97,076 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(96,519 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of
period |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
677,606 |
|
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
677,330 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
1,652 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
580,530 |
|
|
|
($2,473 |
) |
|
$ |
580,811 |
|
|
88
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
|
($556,350 |
) |
|
|
($569,643 |
) |
|
|
($380,689 |
) |
|
$ |
1,506,682 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed losses of subsidiaries |
|
|
451,554 |
|
|
|
567,357 |
|
|
|
587,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and
equipment |
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
47,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,033 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
Amortization and fair value adjustment of
servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
Net (accretion of discounts) amortization of
premiums and deferred fees |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,430 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
50,613 |
|
Net (gain) loss on sale and valuation adjustment
of investment securities |
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
10,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(230,005 |
) |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
(220,792 |
) |
Gains from changes in fair value related to
instruments
measured at fair value pursuant to SFAS No.
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,674 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on disposition of premises and
equipment |
|
|
2,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Net loss on sale of loans and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,202 |
|
(Gain) loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(26,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,898 |
) |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
(Earnings) losses from investments under the
equity method |
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
(12,799 |
) |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(1,302 |
) |
|
|
(14,307 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net of valuation |
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(76,800 |
) |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
(76,444 |
) |
Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919,719 |
) |
Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(280,243 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,258 |
|
Net decrease in trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,302,093 |
|
Net decrease in accrued income receivable |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
23,839 |
|
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
|
|
24,935 |
|
Net decrease in other assets |
|
|
7,799 |
|
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
58,671 |
|
|
|
(46,307 |
) |
|
|
26,935 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable |
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,497 |
) |
|
|
(52,539 |
) |
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
(57,763 |
) |
Net increase in postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,652 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
5,633 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(20,311 |
) |
|
|
33,972 |
|
|
|
46,176 |
|
|
|
65,431 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
443,923 |
|
|
|
570,774 |
|
|
|
509,131 |
|
|
|
1,141,499 |
|
|
|
(1,606,711 |
) |
|
|
1,058,616 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
83,231 |
|
|
|
14,424 |
|
|
|
(60,512 |
) |
|
|
760,810 |
|
|
|
(100,029 |
) |
|
|
697,924 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in money market
investments |
|
|
79,643 |
|
|
|
(6,825 |
) |
|
|
449,835 |
|
|
|
(304,212 |
) |
|
|
(522,610 |
) |
|
|
(304,169 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
(249,603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,047,796 |
) |
|
|
191,484 |
|
|
|
(4,105,915 |
) |
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
(51,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,562 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and
redemptions of investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,247,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261,801 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
27,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,535 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,480 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
426,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,590,320 |
|
|
|
(191,484 |
) |
|
|
3,825,502 |
|
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,294 |
|
Net repayments on loans |
|
|
655,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,200 |
|
|
|
679,468 |
|
|
|
(676,355 |
) |
|
|
666,618 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,414 |
|
Acquisition of loan portfolios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,965 |
) |
Capital contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(795,000 |
) |
|
|
(795,000 |
) |
|
|
(445,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,035,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of shares of a subsidiary |
|
|
(42,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,625 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
14,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,105 |
|
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,720 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
78,762 |
|
|
|
(801,825 |
) |
|
|
56,006 |
|
|
|
1,709,625 |
|
|
|
836,035 |
|
|
|
1,878,603 |
|
|
89
POPULAR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS CONTINUED
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
PIBI |
|
PNA |
|
subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Popular, Inc. |
(In thousands) |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
Holding Co. |
|
and eliminations |
|
entries |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,591,464 |
) |
|
|
424,356 |
|
|
|
(1,167,108 |
) |
Net decrease
in federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(44,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(788,926 |
) |
|
|
89,680 |
|
|
|
(743,717 |
) |
Net decrease in other short-term borrowings |
|
|
(16,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(661,159 |
) |
|
|
676,355 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
Payments of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798,380 |
) |
|
|
(8,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(807,002 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
60,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,100 |
|
Dividends paid to parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,125 |
) |
|
|
96,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,438 |
) |
Issuance costs and fees paid on exchange of
preferred stock and trust preferred
securities |
|
|
(28,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
(24,618 |
) |
Treasury stock acquired |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Capital contribution from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
795,000 |
|
|
|
795,000 |
|
|
|
445,000 |
|
|
( |
2,035,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(161,037 |
) |
|
|
795,000 |
|
|
|
(2,781 |
) |
|
|
(2,641,295 |
) |
|
|
(744,540 |
) |
|
|
(2,754,653 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
(7,287 |
) |
|
|
(170,860 |
) |
|
|
(8,534 |
) |
|
|
(178,126 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
7,668 |
|
|
|
777,994 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
784,987 |
|
|
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
7,688 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
607,134 |
|
|
|
($9,300 |
) |
|
$ |
606,861 |
|
|
90
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This report includes managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the consolidated financial
position and financial performance of Popular, Inc. (the Corporation or Popular). All
accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be
considered an integral part of this analysis.
OVERVIEW
The Corporation is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding company subject to the
supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation
has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States, the Caribbean and Latin America. In Puerto Rico,
the Corporation provides retail and commercial banking services through its principal banking
subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), as well as auto and equipment leasing and
financing, mortgage loans, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through
specialized subsidiaries. In the United States, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North
America (BPNA), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA is a community bank providing
a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates
branches in New York, California, Illinois, New Jersey and Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts
under its name for the benefit of BPNA. The Corporation has a 49% interest in EVERTEC, which
provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America.
The Overview section that follows provides a description of two significant transactions that
impacted the Corporations operations during 2010, namely the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction
in the second quarter of 2010 and the sale of 51% interest in its former subsidiary EVERTEC in the
third quarter of 2010.
The Corporation reported net income of $494.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
compared with a net loss of $125.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporations net income totaled $353.6 million, compared to a
net loss of $360.7 million for the same period in 2009. Table A provides selected financial data
and performance indicators for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
As discussed in further detail below, the financial results for the third quarter were mostly
impacted by the following factors:
|
|
|
An after-tax gain of $531.0 million, net of transaction costs, on the sale
of a 51% interest in EVERTEC; |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income reflects a $78.5 million discount accretion on covered
loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving characteristics. This was offset in
part by a reduction in non-interest income resulting from the reduction of the FDIC
indemnification asset for approximately 80% of the discount accreted on ASC Subtopic
310-20 covered loans. Also, net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
included $56.5 million of discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC
Subtopic 310-30; |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses reflect $25.4 million of prepayment penalties or premiums mostly
to extinguish high cost debt; |
|
|
|
|
While net charge-offs and the provision for loan losses decreased significantly as
compared to the third quarter of 2009, they increased from the second quarter of 2010.
Net charge-offs and the provision for loan losses in the Corporations U.S. mainland
operations declined when compared to the second quarter reflecting continued improvement
in credit quality for the Corporations U.S. operations. The Corporations Puerto Rico
operations reflected increased net charge-offs and provision for loan losses, primarily
related to continued losses in the construction and commercial loan portfolios. |
Key Events and Third Quarter Milestones:
On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a majority interest in its processing
and technology business EVERTEC, including the businesses transferred in an internal
reorganization as discussed in Note 3 to the
91
consolidated financial statements. Under the terms of the sale, an unrelated third party acquired a 51% interest in
EVERTEC for cash under a leverage buy-out. The Corporation retained the remaining 49% interest. The
Corporations investment in EVERTEC is currently accounted for under the equity method and the
investment amounted to $177 million as of September 30, 2010, which is included in other assets in
the consolidated statement of condition. As a result of the sale, the Corporation recognized a
pre-tax gain, net of transaction costs, of approximately $616.2 million ($531.0 million after-tax),
of which $640.8 million was separately disclosed within non-interest income in the consolidated
statement of operations and $24.6 million are included as operating expenses (transaction costs).
In connection with the sale, Popular
entered into various agreements including a master services agreement pursuant to which EVERTEC
will continue providing various processing and information technology services to Popular, BPPR,
and their respective subsidiaries. The net cash proceeds received by the Corporation after
transaction costs and taxes were approximately $528.6 million. The sale had a positive impact of
approximately 2.19% on Tier 1 Common, 2.31% on Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios, and of
approximately 1.20% on Populars Tier 1 Leverage ratio. This transaction completes the
Corporations capital plan. The capital raise was agreed with the Corporations regulators as a
condition to be eligible to participate in the FDIC-assisted transaction. In April 2010,
Popular raised $1.1 billion in a public equity offering, which when combined with the gain in the
EVERTEC transaction, resulted in $1.6 billion in additional capital. Refer to Tables A and J of
this MD&A for information on the Corporations capital ratios.
Also, in August 2010, Popular successfully completed the Westernbanks systems and branch
conversions. All retail and commercial accounts were converted to Populars applications. Refer to
the Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction section in this Overview section for a description of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Out of the estimated 1,440 full-time equivalent employees
(FTEs) that Westernbank had at the time of acquisition, the Corporation has hired to date close
to 816 FTEs. The Corporation retained a limited number of the branches, some of which were
consolidated with existing branches of BPPR.
The Corporations operations in Puerto Rico continue to experience high level of charge-offs in the
commercial and construction loan portfolios principally due to reductions in real estate collateral
values. Credit management has remained a primary area of focus in the BPPR reportable segment,
principally in the commercial and construction lending areas. The BPPR reportable segment reported
net income of $12.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared with a net loss of
$13.5 million for the same quarter of 2009. The provision for loan losses of the BPPR reportable
segment amounted to $182.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared with $153.4
million in the third quarter of 2009. As compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the
provision for loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased by $59.9 million.
Given the challenging economic environment in Puerto Rico, the Corporations credit metrics for its
Puerto Rico operations will remain under pressure for the rest of 2010, particularly with respect
to mortgage related assets. The economy on the Island has remained sluggish during 2010 and job
creation continues to be a challenge. The government administration has taken a pragmatic approach
toward a turnaround, reducing the budget deficit by close to 60% through difficult yet necessary
cost-cutting initiatives. In September 2010, the Puerto Rico government signed into law an
aggressive housing incentive package, providing a much needed jolt to the residential housing
market. The whole package is generous, targets primarily new homes but also benefits existing ones,
and has a ten-month sunset, which should create a sense of urgency. The program reduces cash
outlays at closing and grants significant tax exemptions, such as no capital gain tax in the future
sale of an acquired new home, no tax on rental income for 10 years and no property taxes for 5
years on new homes. Following the enactment of this new law, the Corporation has seen an increase
in interest among potential buyers, evidenced by a significant increase in the signing of new
options agreements, which are indicative of future sales activity.
In the U.S. mainland, management remains focused on managing legacy assets and improving the
performance of BPNAs core banking business. The credit performance of BPNA has improved, resulting
in a reduction in the provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2010 of $144.9 million
compared with the third quarter of 2009 and $47.1 million compared with the second quarter of 2010.
BPNAs reportable segment reported a net loss of $14.6 million in the quarter ended September 30,
2010, compared with net losses of $169.9 million in the same quarter of 2009. Net charge-offs in
the U.S. operations for the third quarter of 2010 fell below $100 million for the first time since
the third quarter of 2008 and marked the third consecutive quarter in which loan losses have
declined.
The U.S. operations have followed the general credit trends on the mainland demonstrating
progressive improvement; nonetheless, credit quality continues to be closely monitored. BPNAs
provision for loan losses in the
92
third quarter of 2009 was more than five times larger than what it was in the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
BPNAs top line income has remained steady. Management is working on increasing BPNAs customer
base as it moves from being mainly a Hispanic bank to a more broad-based community bank. To that
end, in July 2010, the Corporation launched a rebranding pilot program in Illinois changing the
name of the bank from Banco Popular North America to Popular Community Bank in order to appeal to a
broader demographic group.
The discussion that follows provides highlights of the Corporations results of operations for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 compared to the results of operations for the same quarter in
2009. It also provides some highlights with respect to the Corporations financial condition,
credit quality, capital and liquidity.
Financial highlights:
|
|
|
Net interest income for the third quarter of 2010 increased $110.5 million, compared
with the third quarter of 2009. The net interest margin on a taxable equivalent basis
increased from 3.51% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to 4.52% for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010. The improvement in the net interest margin was mainly influenced
by the discount accretion on the Westernbank acquired loan portfolio, which totaled $135.0
million for the third quarter of 2010. The higher yield in earning assets was accompanied
with a reduction in the cost of deposits. The favorable variance from the acquired covered
loans was partially offset by a decline in the average volume of non-covered loans,
principally in the commercial and consumer portfolios, and in investment securities. |
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 decreased by
$116.1 million compared with the same quarter in the previous year. This decrease was
mainly the result of higher amounts provisioned during 2009, particularly for commercial
and construction loans, U.S. mainland non-conventional residential mortgage loans and home
equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded for loans considered
impaired. The deteriorated conditions of the Puerto Rico and U.S. economies that prevailed
during 2009, declines in property values, and slowdown in consumer spending, negatively
impacted the Corporations net charge-offs and non-performing assets levels, thus requiring
substantial reserve increases in 2009. Since September 30, 2009, loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding covered loans, decreased by approximately $2.3 billion, particularly in the
commercial, construction and consumer loan portfolios. This decrease in the loan portfolio balance
also contributed to the lower level of provision for loan losses for the third quarter of
2010. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered
loans, was 5.62% as of September 30, 2010, compared with 5.32% as of December 31, 2009, and
4.95% as of September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation experienced improved
delinquency levels in certain portfolios, such as home equity lines of credit and closed-end
second mortgages at E-LOAN and some consumer loan portfolios in Puerto Rico. Management
recognizes that the Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland economies remain fragile, unemployment is
still elevated and real estate markets continue to be unstable. Therefore, it may be early
to expect that this recent favorable experience on non-performing loans in certain
portfolios is indicative of a sustainable longer-term trend. Management continues
reinforcing loan management and workout teams. |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased $636.5 million,
compared with the quarter ended September 30, 2009, mainly associated with the $640.8
million gain recognized, before tax and transaction costs, on the sale of an ownership
interest in EVERTEC. |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 increased by $150.9 million
compared with the same quarter of the previous year mainly due to transaction costs on the
EVERTEC sale, higher personnel costs principally related to Westerbank and losses on the
early extinguishment of debt. Also, influencing the increase in operating expenses is the
fact that operating expenses for the third quarter of 2009 included a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $79.3 million, principally associated to the exchange of trust
preferred securities for common stock. |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense amounted to $102.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
compared with |
93
|
|
|
income tax expense of $6.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily
the result of the gain on the EVERTEC transaction and higher taxable income from the Puerto
Rico operations. Refer to the Income Taxes section in this MD&A for a discussion of the tax
variance and a reconciliation of the effective tax rate for the quarters ended September 30,
2010 and 2009. |
|
|
|
Total assets amounted to $40.8 billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $34.7
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $35.6 billion as of September 30, 2009. The increase in
total assets, when compared to December 31, 2009, was principally in loans
held-in-portfolio by $2.4 billion, due to the loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction, partially offset by reductions in the Corporations non-covered
loan portfolio. Also, the increase in total assets was related to the $3.3 billion FDIC
loss share indemnification asset and a $1.0 billion increase in money market investments,
principally related to the proceeds from the EVERTEC sale, partially offset by a decline in
investment securities available-for-sale by $953 million. The decline in the Corporations
loan portfolio, excluding the impact of the increase due to the covered loans acquired, was
influenced by high levels of loan charge-offs and the impact of exiting origination
channels at BPNA as part of the restructuring activities undertaken during 2009. Also, the
decline in loan originations reflects low demand in a weak economic environment. |
|
|
|
|
Refer to Table Q in the Financial Condition section of this MD&A for the percentage
allocation of the composition of the Corporations financing to total assets. Deposits
totaled $27.7 billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $25.9 billion as of December
31, 2009 and $26.4 billion as of September 30, 2009. The increase in deposits was
associated with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, partially offset by lower volume
of brokered certificates of deposits and reductions due to the effect of closure, sale and
consolidation of branches in the U.S. mainland operations, and the attrition impact due to
the reduction in the pricing of deposits, including internet deposits. Borrowed funds
amounted to $7.7 billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $5.3 billion as of
December 31, 2009 and $5.5 billion as of September 30, 2009. The increase in borrowings
from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was related to the note issued to the FDIC in
the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, which had a carrying amount of $3.3 billion as
of September 30, 2010, partially offset by the impact of deleveraging strategies. |
In late 2008, the Corporation discontinued the operations of Popular Financial Holdings (PFH) by
selling assets and closing service branches and other units. The loss from discontinued operations,
net of taxes, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $3.4 million and $20.0
million, respectively. This loss was primarily related to salary and other expenses incurred in
providing loan portfolio servicing to affiliated companies and other costs for employees that were
retained for a transition period, as well as adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold in
prior periods. The results of PFH are presented as part of Loss from discontinued operations, net
of income tax in Table A. The discussions in this MD&A pertain to Popular, Inc.s continuing
operations, unless otherwise indicated.
94
TABLE A
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition Highlights |
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
Average for the nine months |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009* |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
2,023,949 |
|
|
$ |
1,098,823 |
|
|
$ |
925,126 |
|
|
$ |
1,558,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,107 |
|
|
$ |
364,276 |
|
Investment and trading securities |
|
|
6,597,136 |
|
|
|
7,827,552 |
|
|
|
(1,230,416 |
) |
|
|
7,002,398 |
|
|
|
8,237,875 |
|
|
|
(1,235,477 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
26,263,797 |
|
|
|
24,471,516 |
|
|
|
1,792,281 |
|
|
|
24,951,632 |
|
|
|
25,102,124 |
|
|
|
(150,492 |
) |
Earning assets |
|
|
34,884,882 |
|
|
|
33,397,891 |
|
|
|
1,486,991 |
|
|
|
33,512,413 |
|
|
|
34,534,106 |
|
|
|
(1,021,693 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
40,820,716 |
|
|
|
35,637,804 |
|
|
|
5,182,912 |
|
|
|
38,027,298 |
|
|
|
37,089,769 |
|
|
|
937,529 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
27,740,044 |
|
|
|
26,382,898 |
|
|
|
1,357,146 |
|
|
|
26,482,395 |
|
|
|
27,028,450 |
|
|
|
(546,055 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
7,692,869 |
|
|
|
5,460,789 |
|
|
|
2,232,080 |
|
|
|
7,522,719 |
|
|
|
6,021,727 |
|
|
|
1,500,992 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
4,109,200 |
|
|
|
2,742,456 |
|
|
|
1,366,744 |
|
|
|
3,041,119 |
|
|
|
2,960,735 |
|
|
|
80,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Highlights |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
386,918 |
|
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
|
$ |
110,529 |
|
|
$ |
934,811 |
|
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
|
$ |
102,876 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
(116,050 |
) |
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
(395,565 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
796,524 |
|
|
|
160,044 |
|
|
|
636,480 |
|
|
|
1,170,248 |
|
|
|
720,614 |
|
|
|
449,634 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
371,547 |
|
|
|
220,600 |
|
|
|
150,947 |
|
|
|
980,876 |
|
|
|
855,442 |
|
|
|
125,434 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax |
|
|
596,882 |
|
|
|
(115,230 |
) |
|
|
712,112 |
|
|
|
466,712 |
|
|
|
(355,929 |
) |
|
|
822,641 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
102,388 |
|
|
|
6,331 |
|
|
|
96,057 |
|
|
|
113,101 |
|
|
|
(15,209 |
) |
|
|
128,310 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of
income tax |
|
|
494,494 |
|
|
|
(121,561 |
) |
|
|
616,055 |
|
|
|
353,611 |
|
|
|
(340,720 |
) |
|
|
694,331 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
|
|
19,972 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($124,988 |
) |
|
$ |
619,482 |
|
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($360,692 |
) |
|
|
$714,303 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
|
($101,120 |
) |
|
$ |
161,944 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
$ |
43,007 |
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations basic
and diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
($0.93 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
($0.81 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations basic
and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
Total net income per common share basic
and diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
($0.92 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
($0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
Selected Statistical Information |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Common Stock Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
|
$ |
4.02 |
|
|
$ |
5.52 |
|
Low |
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
End |
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
Book value per common share at period end |
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
Profitability Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
(1.38 |
%) |
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
(1.30 |
%) |
Return on common equity |
|
|
57.27 |
|
|
|
(26.24 |
) |
|
|
16.31 |
|
|
|
(31.48 |
) |
Net interest spread (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
Net interest margin (taxable equivalent) |
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
Capitalization Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
8.63 |
% |
|
|
7.74 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
7.98 |
% |
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
14.87 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
14.87 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
16.16 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
16.16 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
Leverage ratio |
|
|
9.99 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
9.99 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes discontinued operations. |
|
As a financial services company, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by
general business and economic conditions. Lending and deposit activities and fee income generation
are influenced by the level of business spending and investment, consumer income, spending and
savings, capital market activities, competition, customer preferences, interest rate conditions and
prevailing market rates on competing products. The Corporation continuously monitors general
business and economic conditions, industry-related indicators and trends, competition, interest
rate volatility, credit quality indicators, loan and deposit demand, operational and systems
95
efficiencies, revenue enhancements and changes in the regulation of financial services companies.
The Corporation operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes
in federal and local laws and regulations. Also, competition with other financial institutions
could adversely affect its profitability.
The description of the Corporations business contained in Item 1 of the Corporations Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, while not all inclusive, discusses additional information
about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the Corporations control that,
in addition to the other information in this Form 10-Q, including Item 1A of Part II, readers
should consider.
The Corporations common stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers
Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) system under the symbol BPOP.
Reconciliation of net income per common share:
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income per common share for the quarters
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
|
($121,561 |
) |
|
$ |
353,611 |
|
|
|
($340,720 |
) |
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,972 |
) |
Deemed dividend on preferred stock [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends [2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,857 |
) |
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,515 |
) |
Favorable impact from exchange of shares of
Series A and B preferred stock for
common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,388 |
|
Favorable impact from exchange of Series C
preferred stock for trust preferred
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,280 |
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
494,494 |
|
|
$ |
595,614 |
|
|
$ |
161,944 |
|
|
$ |
310,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
1,021,374,014 |
|
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
839,196,564 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
Average potential dilutive common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution |
|
|
1,021,374,014 |
|
|
|
425,672,578 |
|
|
|
839,509,525 |
|
|
|
330,325,348 |
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per common
share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share
from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
Total basic and diluted net income per
common share |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
[1] |
|
Deemed dividend related to the issuance of depositary shares and the conversion of the
preferred stock into shares of common stock in the second quarter of 2010. |
[2] |
|
Amount presented for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 represents the reversal of dividends
on Series C preferred stock considered accrued as of June 30, 2009 for EPS purposes only. These
cumulative dividends were not paid as dividends to the Series C preferred stockholders given the
terms of the exchange agreement to new trust preferred securities, which was effected in August
2009. |
96
Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction:
On April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into a purchase and assumption
agreement with the FDIC to acquire certain assets and assume certain deposits and liabilities of
Westernbank Puerto Rico, a Puerto Rico state-chartered bank headquartered in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
(Westernbank).
The following table presents balances recorded by the Corporation at the time of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction on April 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As recorded by |
|
|
|
accounting |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Popular, Inc. on |
|
(In thousands) |
|
adjustments |
|
|
adjustments |
|
|
consideration |
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and money market investments |
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
358,132 |
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
58,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,610 |
|
Covered loans |
|
|
8,503,839 |
|
|
|
($4,286,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,216,992 |
|
Non-covered loans |
|
|
50,905 |
|
|
|
(6,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,996 |
|
FDIC loss share indemnification asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,561 |
|
Covered other real estate owned |
|
|
125,947 |
|
|
|
(52,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,235 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,415 |
|
Receivable from FDIC (associated to the note
issued to the FDIC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
|
111,101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
9,142,359 |
|
|
|
($999,492 |
) |
|
$ |
111,101 |
|
|
$ |
8,253,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
2,380,170 |
|
|
$ |
11,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,391,635 |
|
Note issued to the FDIC (including a premium
of $11,612 resulting from the fair value
adjustment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,769,696 |
|
|
|
5,769,696 |
|
Equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
Contingent liability on unfunded loan commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,442 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
2,394,095 |
|
|
$ |
143,907 |
|
|
$ |
5,822,196 |
|
|
$ |
8,360,198 |
|
|
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
6,748,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate fair value adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($1,143,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate additional consideration, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,711,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill on acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,230 |
|
|
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of
the April 30, 2010 transaction date. These fair value estimates are considered preliminary, and
are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional
information relative to closing date fair values may become available.
The Corporation refers to the loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except
credit cards, as covered loans as the Corporation will be reimbursed by the FDIC for a
substantial portion of any future losses on such loans under the terms of the loss sharing
agreements. Foreclosed other real estate properties are also covered under the loss sharing
agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDICs obligation to
reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to assets covered by such agreements (collectively, covered
assets) begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. On a combined basis, the FDIC will
reimburse BPPR for 80% of all qualifying losses with respect to the covered assets. BPPR will
reimburse the FDIC for 80% of qualifying recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC
reimbursed BPPR. The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans
provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC to last for ten years, and the
loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and
BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC to last for five years, with additional recovery sharing for three
years thereafter.
In June 2020, approximately ten years following the acquisition date, BPPR may be required to make
a payment to the FDIC in the event that losses on covered assets under the loss sharing agreements
have been less than originally
97
estimated as determined pursuant to a formula established under the agreements that is
described in Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The FDIC has certain rights to withhold loss sharing payments if BPPR does not perform its
obligations under the loss sharing agreements in accordance with their terms and to withdraw the
loss share protection if certain significant transactions are effected without FDIC consent.
Covered loans under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC are reported in loans exclusive of the
estimated FDIC loss share indemnification asset. The covered loans acquired in the Westernbank
transaction are, and will continue to be, reviewed for collectability. Refer to the Critical
Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for the Corporations accounting policy on
acquired loans and related indemnification assets.
As part of the consideration for the transaction, the FDIC received an equity appreciation
instrument in which BPPR agreed to make a cash payment to the holder thereof equal to the product
of (a) 50 million and (b) the amount by which the average volume weighted price of the
Corporations common stock over the two NASDAQ trading days immediately prior to the date on which
the equity appreciation instrument is exercised exceeds $3.43 (Popular, Inc.s 20-day trailing
average common stock price on April 27, 2010). The equity appreciation instrument is exercisable by
the holder thereof, in whole or in part, up to May 7, 2011. As of April 30, 2010, the fair value of
the equity appreciation instrument was estimated at $52.5 million, compared with $17.5 million as
of September 30, 2010. The equity appreciation instrument is recorded as a liability and any
subsequent changes in its estimated fair value are recognized in earnings, adding volatility to the
Corporations results of operations.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized
in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at
the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent
to September 30, 2010. Such evaluation resulted in no adjustments or additional disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
REGULATORY REFORM
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). The Dodd-Frank Act implements sweeping changes in the
regulation of financial institutions and will fundamentally change the system of oversight
described under Item 1. BusinessRegulation and Supervision in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The implications for our business practices, the regulatory
and competitive environment in which we operate and our financial performance will depend to a
large extent on the content of required future rulemaking by the Federal Reserve Board, the SEC and
other agencies under the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as the development of market practices and
structures under the regime established by the legislation. Among the numerous provisions of the
Dodd-Frank Act that could have an effect on us are:
|
|
|
Heightened supervision of systemically important financial institutions and financial
market utilities. The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new systemic risk oversight body, the
Financial Stability Oversight Council, that will, among other things, make recommendations
to the Federal Reserve Board as to supervisory requirements and prudential standards
applicable to systemically important financial institutions and entities that are
designated as financial market utilities (defined to include persons that manage or
operate a multilateral system for the purpose of transferring, clearing or settling
payments, securities or other transactions among financial institutions, including
repurchase agreements). The legislation will also subject these institutions to heightened
risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity and risk-management requirements, including
periodic stress tests, as well as limitations on credit exposures. |
98
|
|
|
Increased fees to banking regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Reserve
Board to assess fees against large banking entities such as us to cover the cost of
examining and supervising these entities. The FDIC will also collect fees from entities it
examines to cover the cost of the examination. In addition, the FDIC is required to amend
its regulations regarding the assessment for federal deposit insurance to base such
assessments on the average total consolidated assets of the insured depository institution
(rather than on the amount of its deposits) during the assessment period, less the average
tangible equity of the institution during the assessment period. The Dodd-Frank Act also
eliminates the ceiling on the size of the Deposit Insurance Fund (currently 1.5% of
estimated insured deposits), and raises the statutorily required floor for the Deposit
Insurance Fund from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insured
deposits, or a comparable percentage of the revised assessment base required by the Act.
These provisions generally will require an increase in the level of assessments for
institutions such as the Corporation with assets exceeding $10 billion. |
|
|
|
|
Increased capital requirements. The Collins Amendment provisions of the Dodd-Frank
Act will subject us at a company-wide level to the same leverage and risk-based capital
requirements that apply to depository institutions specifically, and direct banking
regulators to develop enhanced capital requirements. In addition, these provisions will
exclude trust preferred securities and cumulative preferred stock from Tier 1 capital,
subject to phase-out from Tier 1 qualification for securities issued before May 19, 2010,
with the phase-out commencing on January 1, 2013 and to be implemented incrementally over
a three-year period commencing on that date. Debt or equity instruments issued to the Federal government or
any agency before the end of the Treasurys authority to invest via TARP on October 4, 2010, are exempt from the Collins Amendment.
A number of other governments and regulators, including the U.S. Treasury and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, have also
called for increased capital requirements and increased quality of capital. |
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act repeals the federal prohibition on the payment
of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest
on business transaction and other accounts. |
|
|
|
|
Derivatives regulation. The Dodd-Frank Act contains provisions designed to increase
transparency in over-the-counter derivatives markets by requiring that all swaps (except
those with non-financial end users) be executed and cleared through regulated facilities.
In addition, the derivatives push-out provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will essentially
prevent us from conducting significant swaps-related activities through the Corporation or
another insured depository institution subsidiary, subject to exceptions for certain
interest rate and currency swaps and for hedging or risk mitigation activities directly
related to the banks business. These activities may be conducted elsewhere within the
Corporation, subject to compliance with Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and
any other requirements imposed by the SEC, CFTC or Federal Reserve Board. |
|
|
|
|
Increased costs for consumer lending activities. The Dodd-Frank Act includes a number
of provisions that may reduce the revenues generated by, or increase the cost of
conducting, our consumer lending businesses. These include provisions which: (1) amend
the Truth-in-Lending Act with respect to mortgage originations, including originator
compensation, minimum repayment standards and prepayment considerations; (2) restrict
variable-rate lending by requiring the borrowers ability to repay to be determined for
variable-rate loans by using the maximum rate that will apply during the first five years
of a variable-rate loan term, and making more loans subject to provisions for higher cost
loans, new disclosures, and certain other revisions; and (3) direct the Federal Reserve
Board to issue rules which are expected to limit debit card interchange fees. |
|
|
|
|
Executive compensation. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC, the Federal Reserve Board
and other agencies to jointly issue rules requiring enhanced reporting and regulation of
incentive-based compensation structures at regulated entities, including bank holding
companies, banks, registered broker-dealers and registered investment advisors. In
addition, the Federal Reserve Board has issued guidance designed to ensure that incentive
compensation at banking institutions does not encourage excessive risk-taking. |
|
|
|
|
Transactions with affiliates. The Dodd-Frank Act significantly expands the coverage and
scope of the regulations that limit affiliate transactions within a banking organization,
including coverage of the credit |
99
|
|
|
exposure on derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements,
securities borrowing and lending transactions and transactions with sponsored hedge funds
and private equity funds. |
|
|
|
|
Expanded standards of care. The Dodd-Frank Act provides for expanded standards of care
by market participants in dealing with clients and customers, including by providing the
SEC with authority to adopt rules establishing fiduciary duties for broker-dealers and
directing the SEC to examine and improve sales practices and disclosure by broker-dealers
and investment advisers. |
The specific impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our businesses and the markets in which we operate
will depend on the manner in which the relevant agencies develop and implement the required rules
and the reaction of market participants to these regulatory developments. We anticipate that the
process of rulemaking and the development of related market practices and structures will take
several years. Although we cannot predict how regulatory implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act will
occur, the related findings of various regulatory and commission studies, the interpretations
issued as part of the rulemaking process and the final regulations that are issued with respect to
various elements of the new law may cause changes that impact the profitability of our business
activities and require that we change certain of our business practices, and could expose us to
additional costs (including increased compliance costs). These changes may also require us to
invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes.
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 860) Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets (ASU 2009-16)
ASU 2009-16 amends previous guidance relating to transfers of financial assets and eliminates the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, removes the exception for guaranteed mortgage
securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial
assets, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and includes additional
disclosures requiring more information about transfers of financial assets in which entities have
continuing exposure to the risks related to the transferred financial assets. Among the most
significant amendments and additions to this guidance are changes to the conditions for sales of
financial assets which objective is to determine whether a transferor and its consolidated
affiliates included in the financial statements have surrendered control over transferred financial
assets or third-party beneficial interests, and the addition of the meaning of the term
participating interest which represents a proportionate (pro rata) ownership interest in an entire
financial asset. The requirements for sale accounting must be applied only to a financial asset in
its entirety, a pool of financial assets in its entirety, or participating interests as defined in
ASC paragraph 860-10-40-6A. This guidance has been applied as of the beginning of the first annual
reporting period that began after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period and will be applied for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier
application was prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions have been applied to
transfers that have occurred on or after the effective date. On and after the effective date,
existing qualifying special-purpose entities have been evaluated for consolidation in accordance
with the applicable consolidation guidance in the Codification. The Corporation adopted this new
authoritative accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010. The Corporation evaluated transfers of
financial assets executed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 pursuant to the new
accounting guidance, principally consisting of guaranteed mortgage securitizations (Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
mortgage-backed securities), and determined that the adoption of ASU 2009-16 did not have a
significant impact on the Corporations accounting for such transactions or results of operations
or financial condition for such period.
A securitization of a financial asset, a participating interest in a financial asset, or a pool of
financial assets in which the Corporation (and its consolidated affiliates) (a) surrenders control
over the transferred assets and (b) receives cash or other proceeds is accounted for as a sale.
Control is considered to be surrendered only if all three of the following conditions are met: (1)
the assets have been legally isolated; (2) the transferee has the ability to pledge or exchange the
assets; and (3) the transferor no longer maintains effective control over the assets. When the
Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of the above criteria, the
Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is
accounted for as a secured borrowing.
100
The Corporation recognizes and initially measures at fair value a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract in either of the following situations: (1) a transfer of an entire financial
asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset
that meets the requirements for sale accounting; or (2) an acquisition or assumption of a servicing
obligation of financial assets that do not pertain to the Corporation or its consolidated
subsidiaries. Upon adoption of ASU 2009-16, the Corporation does not recognize either a servicing
asset or a servicing liability if it transfers or securitizes financial assets in a transaction
that does not meet the requirements for sale accounting and is accounted for as a secured
borrowing.
Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on transfers of financial
assets and servicing assets retained as part of guaranteed mortgage securitizations.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2009-17, Consolidations (ASC Topic 810) Improvements to
Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities (ASU 2009-17) and
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Amendments for Certain
Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10)
ASU 2009-17 amends the guidance applicable to variable interest entities (VIEs) and changes how a
reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled
through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. This guidance replaces a
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which entity, if any, has both (a)
a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying which entity has
the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance requires
reconsideration of whether an entity is a VIE when any changes in facts or circumstances occur such
that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. It also
requires ongoing assessments of whether a variable interest holder is the primary beneficiary of a
VIE. The amendments to the consolidated guidance affect all entities that were within the scope of
the original guidance, as well as qualifying special-purpose entities (QSPEs) that were
previously excluded from the guidance. ASU 2009-17 requires a reporting entity to provide
additional disclosures about its involvement with VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure
due to that involvement. The Corporation adopted this new authoritative accounting guidance
effective January 1, 2010. The new accounting guidance on VIEs did not have an effect on the
Corporations consolidated statement of condition or results of operations upon adoption.
The principal VIEs evaluated by the Corporation during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
included: (1) GNMA and FNMA guaranteed mortgage securitizations and for which management has
concluded that the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary (refer to Note 20 to the consolidated
financial statements) and (2) the trust preferred securities for which management believes that the
Corporation does not possess a significant variable interest on the trusts (refer to Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements).
Additionally, the Corporation has variable interests in certain investments that have the
attributes of investment companies, as well as limited partnership investments in venture capital
companies. However, in January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-10, Consolidation (ASC Topic 810),
Amendments for Certain Investment Funds, which deferred the effective date of the provisions of ASU
2009-17 for a reporting entitys interest in an entity that has all the attributes of an investment
company; or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial
reporting purposes that are consistent with those followed by investment companies. The deferral
allows asset managers that have no obligation to fund potentially significant losses of an
investment entity to continue to apply the previous accounting guidance to investment entities that
have the attributes of entities subject to ASC Topic 946 (the Investment Company Guide). The FASB
also decided to defer the application of ASU 2009-17 for money market funds subject to Rule 2a-7 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940. Asset managers would continue to apply the applicable existing
guidance to those entities that qualify for the deferral. ASU 2010-10 did not defer the disclosure
requirements in ASU 2009-17.
The Corporation was not required to consolidate existing VIEs for which it has a variable interest
as of September 30, 2010. Refer to Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for required
disclosures associated with the guaranteed mortgage securitizations in which the Corporation holds
a variable interest.
101
FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC Topic 820)
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06)
ASU 2010-06, issued in January 2010, revises two disclosure requirements concerning fair value
measurements and clarifies two others. It requires separate presentation of significant transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and disclosure of the reasons for such
transfers. It will also require the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
within Level 3 on a gross basis rather than a net basis. The amendments also clarify that
disclosures should be disaggregated by class of asset or liability and that disclosures about
inputs and valuation techniques should be provided for both recurring and non-recurring fair value
measurements. ASU 2010-06 has been effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations. The Corporations disclosures about fair value measurements are
presented in Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815): Scope Exception
Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (ASU 2010-11)
ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded
derivative bifurcation requirements. The type of credit derivative that qualifies for the exemption
is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities
that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such
subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The
amendments in ASU 2010-11 are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first
fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard in the third quarter of
2010 did not have a significant impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Effect of a Loan
Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU
2010-18)
The amendments in ASU 2010-18, issued in April 2010, affect any entity that acquires loans subject
to ASC Subtopic 310-30, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that
subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides
guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon
acquisition. As a result of the amendments in ASU 2010-18, modifications of loans that are
accounted for within a pool under ASC Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans
from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt
restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in
which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amendments
in ASU 2010-18 do not affect the accounting for loans under the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30 that
are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually under ASC Subtopic 310-30
continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within ASC Subtopic
310-40, ReceivablesTroubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in ASU 2010-18 are
effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under ASC Subtopic 310-30 occurring
in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be
applied prospectively. Early application is permitted. Upon initial adoption of the guidance in ASU
2010-18, an entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under
ASC Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an
entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit deterioration.
The Corporation elected to early adopt the provisions of this statement, effective with the closing
of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction on April 30, 2010. As a result, the accounting for
modified loans follows the guidelines of ASU 2010-18; however, the adoption of these provisions did
not have a significant impact on the Corporations result of operations or financial position as of
September 30, 2010.
102
FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Receivables (ASC Topic 310): Disclosure about the Credit
Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20)
ASU 2010-20, issued in July 2010, expands disclosure requirements about the credit quality of
financing receivables and allowance for credit losses. The objective of this ASU is for an entity
to provide disclosures that facilitate financial statement users evaluation of the
following: (1) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entitys portfolio of financing
receivables; (2) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit
losses; and (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses.
Disclosures should be provided on a disaggregated basis on two defined levels: (1) portfolio
segment; and (2) class of financing receivable. The ASU 2010-20 makes changes to existing
disclosure requirements and includes additional disclosure requirements about financing
receivables, including: the credit quality indicators of financing receivables at the end of the
reporting period by class of financing receivables; the aging of past due financing receivables at
the end of the reporting period by class of financing receivables; and the nature and extent of
troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the period by class of financing receivables and
their effect on the allowance for credit losses. The disclosure requirements as of the end of a
reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. This guidance impacts
disclosures only and will not have an effect on the Corporations consolidated statements of
condition or results of operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and general practices
within the financial services industry. Various elements of the Corporations accounting policies,
by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other
subjective assessments. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time
and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those
estimates.
Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Corporations Audit Committee. The Corporation has identified as critical
accounting policies those related to Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments, Loans and
Allowance for Loan Losses, Income Taxes, Goodwill and Pension and Postretirement Benefit
Obligations. For a summary of these critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to that
particular section in the MD&A included in Popular, Inc.s 2009 Financial Review and Supplementary
Information to Stockholders, incorporated by reference in Popular, Inc.s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the 2009 Annual Report). Also, refer to Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements included in the 2009 Annual Report for a summary of the
Corporations significant accounting policies. As a result of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction, during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, management determined to incorporate
Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related Indemnification Asset as part of the Corporations
critical accounting policies / estimates due to the significance of the assets involved and
significant judgment to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters.
Acquisition Accounting for Loans and Related Indemnification Asset
Beginning in 2009, the Corporation accounts for its acquisitions under ASC Topic No. 805, Business
Combinations, which requires the use of the purchase method of accounting. All identifiable assets
acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the
acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired
incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in
accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820, exclusive of the
shared-loss agreements with the FDIC. These fair value estimates associated with the loans include
estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest
and other cash flows.
Because the FDIC has agreed to reimburse the Corporation for losses related to the acquired loans
in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, an indemnification asset was recorded at fair value
at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the
indemnified loans, and measured on the same basis,
subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The loss share indemnification asset on the
acquisition date
103
reflects the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an
appropriate discount rate, which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.
The initial valuation of these loans and related indemnification asset requires management to make
subjective judgments concerning estimates about how the acquired loans will perform in the future
using valuation methods, including discounted cash flow analysis and independent third-party
appraisals. Factors that may significantly affect the initial valuation include, among others,
market-based and industry data related to expected changes in interest rates, assumptions related
to probability and severity of credit losses, estimated timing of credit losses including the
timing of foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, expected prepayment rates, required or
anticipated loan modifications, unfunded loan commitments, the specific terms and provisions of any
loss share agreements, and specific industry and market conditions that may impact discount rates
and independent third-party appraisals.
Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 represent loans showing evidence of credit
deterioration and that it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Corporation will not
collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Generally, acquired loans that
meet the definition for nonaccrual status fall within the Corporations definition of impaired
loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30. Also, based on the fair value determined for the acquired
portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the definition of nonaccrual status also resulted in
the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality. Accordingly, an election
was made by the Corporation to apply the accretable yield method (expected cash flow model of ASC
Subtopic 310-30), as a loan with credit deterioration and impairment, instead of the standard loan
discount accretion guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20. These loans are disclosed as a loan that was
acquired with credit deterioration and impairment.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the covered loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools
based on loans that had common risk characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single
asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.
Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction included
loan type, interest rate type, accruing status, and amortization type. Once the pools are defined,
the Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single
asset.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at
acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the accretable yield, is recognized as interest
income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and
amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference
represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows
expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those
expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in
expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan
losses.
The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for
pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, represents the difference between the
contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan.
This discount is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan if the loan is in accruing
status. Any cash flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in
earnings at the time of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving
privileges, which are accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to
periodic review to determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses.
The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the
related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable
with the assets should the assets be sold. The indemnification asset is recognized on the same
basis as the assets subject to loss share protection. As such, for covered loans accounted pursuant
to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income
prospectively consistent with the approach taken to recognize increases in cash flows on covered
loans. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount recorded as
of the acquisition date is accreted into income, a reversal of the corresponding indemnification
asset is recorded as a reduction in non-interest income.
Increases in expected reimbursements will be recognized in income in the same period that the
allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized.
104
Over the life of the acquired loans that are accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation
continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on individual loans or on pools of loans
sharing common risk characteristics. The Corporation evaluates at each balance sheet date whether
the present value of its loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased and if
so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of operations and an
allowance for loan losses in its consolidated statement of condition. For any increases in cash
flows expected to be collected, the Corporation adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized
on a prospective basis over the loans or pools remaining life.
Loss assumptions used in the basis of the indemnified loans are consistent with the loss
assumptions used to measure the indemnification asset. Fair value accounting incorporates into the
fair value of the indemnification asset an element of the time value of money, which is accreted
back into income over the life of the shared loss agreements. Upon the determination of an incurred
loss, the loss share indemnification asset will be reduced by the amount owed by the FDIC. A
corresponding claim receivable is recorded until cash is received from the FDIC.
These evaluations of estimated cash flows expected to be collected subsequent to acquisition on
loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 and inherent losses on loans accounted pursuant to
ASC Subtopic 310-20 require the continued usage of key assumptions and estimates. Given the current
economic environment, the Corporation must apply judgment to develop its estimates of cash flows
considering the impact of home price and property value changes, changing loss severities and
prepayment speeds. Decreases in the expected cash flows for ASC Subtopic 310-30 loans and decreases
in the net realizable value of ASC Subtopic 310-20 loans will generally result in a charge to the
provision for credit losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. These
estimates are particularly sensitive to changes in loan credit quality.
The amount that the Corporation realizes on the covered loans and related indemnification assets
could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in these financial statements, based upon
the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. The Corporations
losses on these assets may be mitigated to the extent covered under the specific terms and
provisions of any loss share agreements.
Refer to Notes 2, 4 and 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further
discussions on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction and loans acquired.
Goodwill
The Corporations goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite useful
life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for impairment at
least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate impairment could
have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse change in the
business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the competitive
environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.
Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first
step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with
its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its
carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed.
The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for
which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is
determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which
is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the
aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles (including
any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the
reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting
unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of
the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the requirements of the fair value
measurements accounting standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions,
thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair value of
the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the assets,
liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value
of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of condition. If
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill
105
assigned to the reporting unit, there is no
impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the
goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot
exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in
the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted under applicable
accounting standards.
As of September 30, 2010, goodwill totaled $665 million. Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements provides an allocation of goodwill by business segment.
The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization
during the third quarter of 2010 using July 31, 2010 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting
units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which
are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation follows push-down accounting,
as such all goodwill is assigned to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination.
In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of
methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as
discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting
unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates
the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value
drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the
circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in
specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.
The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that
are used as part of these evaluations include:
|
|
|
a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business,
location and size; |
|
|
|
|
a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions; |
|
|
|
|
the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of
equity; |
|
|
|
|
the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and |
|
|
|
|
the market growth and new business assumptions. |
For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average
price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the
reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the
reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment
is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an
assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is
inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of
judgment.
For purposes of the discounted cash flows (DCF) approach, the valuation is based on estimated
future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting
unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the
Corporations Asset / Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The growth assumptions included in
these projections are based on managements expectations for each reporting units financial
prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity
(i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows
was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 8.42% to 23.24% for the 2010
analysis. The Ibbottson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return
of a risk-free asset (10-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as
equity risk premium, size premium and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were
analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made
when necessary.
For BPNA, the only reporting unit that failed Step 1, the Corporation determined the fair value of
Step 1 utilizing a market value approach based on a combination of price multiples from comparable
companies and multiples from capital raising transactions of comparable companies. The market
multiples used included price to book and price to tangible book. Additionally, the Corporation
determined the reporting unit fair value using a DCF analysis based on BPNAs financial
projections, but assigned no weight to it given that the current market approaches provide a
106
more meaningful measure of fair value considering the reporting units financial performance and current
market conditions. The Step 1 fair value for BPNA under both valuation approaches (market and DCF)
was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the valuation date (July 31),
requiring the completion of Step 2. In accordance with accounting standards, the Corporation
performed a valuation of all assets and liabilities of BPNA, including any recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of BPNAs net assets. To complete Step
2, the Corporation subtracted from BPNAs Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net
assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 indicated that
the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $402 million at July 31,
2010, resulting in no goodwill impairment. The reduction in BPNAs Step 1 fair value was offset by
a reduction in the fair value of its net assets, resulting in an implied fair value of goodwill
that exceeds the recorded book value of goodwill.
The analysis of the results for Step 2 indicates that the reduction in the fair value of the
reporting unit was mainly attributed to the deteriorated fair value of the loan portfolios and not
to the fair value of the reporting unit as a going concern entity. The current negative performance
of the reporting unit is principally related to deteriorated credit quality in its loan portfolio,
which agrees with the results of the Step 2 analysis. The fair value determined for BPNAs loan
portfolio in the July 31, 2010 annual test represented a discount of 23.6%, compared with 20.2% at
December 31, 2009. The discount is mainly attributed to market participants expected rate of
returns, which affected the market discount on the commercial and construction loan portfolios and
deteriorated credit quality of the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios of BPNA. Refer to the
Reportable Segments Results section of this MD&A, which provides highlights of BPNAs reportable
segment financial performance for the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010.
BPNAs provision for loan losses, as a stand-alone legal entity, which is the reporting unit level
used for the goodwill impairment analysis, amounted to $226 million for nine months ended September
30, 2010, which represented 144% of BPNA legal entitys net loss of $157 million for that period.
If the Step 1 fair value of BPNA declines further in the future without a corresponding decrease in
the fair value of its net assets or if loan discounts improve without a corresponding increase in
the Step 1 fair value, the Corporation may be required to record a goodwill impairment charge. The
Corporation engaged a third-party valuator to assist management in the annual evaluation of BPNAs
goodwill (including Step 1 and Step 2) as well as BPNAs loan portfolios as of the July 31, 2010
valuation date. Management discussed the methodologies, assumptions and results supporting the
relevant values for conclusions and determined they were reasonable.
For the BPPR reporting unit, had the average reporting unit estimated fair value calculated in Step
1 using all valuation methodologies been approximately 16% lower, there would still be no
requirement to perform a Step 2 analysis, thus there would be no indication of impairment on the
goodwill recorded in BPPR at July 31, 2010. For the BPNA reporting unit, had the estimated implied
fair value of goodwill calculated in Step 2 been approximately 63% lower, there would still be no
impairment of the goodwill recorded in BPNA at July 31, 2010. The goodwill balance of BPPR and
BPNA, as legal entities, represented approximately 91% of the Corporations total goodwill balance
as of the July 31, 2010 valuation date.
Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair
values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding
that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2010 annual
assessment were reasonable.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and
assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill
that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporations results of operations and the reporting
units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporations market capitalization increase
the risk of goodwill impairment in the future.
Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these
events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting
unit below its carrying amount. As indicated in this MD&A, the economic situation in the United
States and Puerto Rico, including deterioration in the housing market and credit market, continued
to negatively impact the financial results of the Corporation during 2010.
107
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented with its different components
on Tables B and C for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared with the
same periods in 2009, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest
bearing liabilities.
The interest earning assets include the investment securities and loans that are exempt from income
tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain
investments in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and sponsored entities, and certain
obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies. Assets held by the Corporations
international banking entities, which previously were tax exempt under Puerto Rico law, have a
temporary 5% tax rate. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the
interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory
income tax rates at each quarter, in the subsidiaries that have the benefit. The taxable equivalent
computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico tax law. Under
this law, the exempt interest can be deducted up to the amount of taxable income. BPPRs current
tax position changed in the third quarter of 2010 and the benefit previously obtained from exempt
investments is, for now, not applicable, therefore no adjustments were made to BPPRs net interest
income since its current tax is the marginal tax rate.
Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized
gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the
respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the
origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to
interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums /
discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 included a favorable impact, excluding the
discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-30, of $5.9 million
and $14.6 million, respectively, related to those items, compared to a favorable impact of $4.8
million and $17.1 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
The discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 and 310-30, as described
below, was $78.5 million and $56.5 million, respectively for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
108
TABLE B
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations
Quarter ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
$ |
1,560 |
|
$ |
936 |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
(0.29 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
1,391 |
|
|
$ |
1,510 |
|
|
|
($119 |
) |
|
|
($310 |
) |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
6,139 |
|
|
7,551 |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
57,393 |
|
|
|
85,459 |
|
|
|
(28,066 |
) |
|
|
(12,900 |
) |
|
|
(15,166 |
) |
|
500 |
|
|
517 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
6.79 |
|
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
Trading securities |
|
|
8,262 |
|
|
|
8,857 |
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
(0.98 |
) |
|
Total money market, investment and trading securities |
|
|
67,046 |
|
|
|
95,826 |
|
|
|
(28,780 |
) |
|
|
(13,510 |
) |
|
|
(15,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,955 |
|
|
15,034 |
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
157,214 |
|
|
|
186,969 |
|
|
|
(29,755 |
) |
|
|
(4,439 |
) |
|
|
(25,316 |
) |
|
618 |
|
|
707 |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
8.74 |
|
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
13,506 |
|
|
|
14,665 |
|
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
|
4,627 |
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
69,685 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
|
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(3,747 |
) |
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
99,946 |
|
|
|
104,597 |
|
|
|
(4,651 |
) |
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
(9,556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,014 |
|
|
24,453 |
|
|
(2,439 |
) |
|
|
6.15 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
Sub-total loans |
|
|
340,351 |
|
|
|
376,795 |
|
|
|
(36,444 |
) |
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
|
(33,925 |
) |
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
14.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.33 |
|
|
Covered loans |
|
|
145,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,050 |
|
|
24,453 |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
7.41 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
485,911 |
|
|
|
376,795 |
|
|
|
109,116 |
|
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
|
111,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,249 |
|
|
$33,457 |
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
552,957 |
|
|
$ |
472,621 |
|
|
$ |
80,336 |
|
|
|
($16,029 |
) |
|
$ |
96,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,986 |
|
|
$4,768 |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
(0.22 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market* |
|
$ |
10,047 |
|
|
$ |
12,284 |
|
|
|
($2,237 |
) |
|
|
($2,748 |
) |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
6,139 |
|
|
5,496 |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
14,297 |
|
|
|
12,733 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
12,109 |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
(0.86 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
61,986 |
|
|
|
93,924 |
|
|
|
(31,938 |
) |
|
|
(23,749 |
) |
|
|
(8,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,202 |
|
|
22,373 |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
(0.57 |
) |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
86,330 |
|
|
|
118,941 |
|
|
|
(32,611 |
) |
|
|
(26,556 |
) |
|
|
(6,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
14,945 |
|
|
|
16,142 |
|
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
6,309 |
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
3,633 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
(2.43 |
) |
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
62,494 |
|
|
|
42,991 |
|
|
|
19,503 |
|
|
|
9,658 |
|
|
|
9,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,930 |
|
|
27,734 |
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
163,769 |
|
|
|
178,074 |
|
|
|
(14,305 |
) |
|
|
(16,350 |
) |
|
|
2,045 |
|
|
4,908 |
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
1,414 |
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,249 |
|
|
$33,457 |
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
|
(0.21 |
%) |
|
Total source of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
389,188 |
|
|
|
294,547 |
|
|
|
94,641 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
94,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.32 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
(15,888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
386,918 |
|
|
$ |
276,389 |
|
|
$ |
110,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate
based on the proportion of the change in each category.
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
The increase in net interest margin for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 compared with the
same period in 2009 was driven mostly by:
|
|
|
$78.5 million discount accretion on covered loans acquired from the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their
revolving characteristics. Also, the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $56.5 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010. This impact is included in the line item Covered loans in Table A. |
109
|
|
|
a decrease in deposit costs associated to both a low interest rate scenario and
management actions to reduce deposits costs, principally in certificates of deposits and
money market accounts, as well as lower costs on brokered
certificates of deposit; and |
|
|
|
|
higher yield in consumer loans mainly reflected in the credit cards portfolio, in part
due to revisions made to the spread charged over the prime rate for different risk
categories. |
The above variances were partially offset by the following factors which affected negatively the
Corporations net interest margin:
|
|
|
the excess liquidity from the capital issuance described in the Overview section, the
proceeds of which were temporarily invested in money market investments with the Federal
Reserve earning a very low interest rate, which reduced the yield on earning assets; |
|
|
|
|
the FDIC loss share indemnification asset of $3.3 billion, which is a non-interest
earning asset being funded with interest bearing liabilities, mainly through the FDIC note
at a 2.50% annual fixed interest rate. The accretion or amortization of the FDIC loss share indemnification
asset goes through non-interest income; |
|
|
|
|
the conversion of $935 million of Series C preferred stock to trust preferred securities
in August 2009 contributed to an increase of $10.5 million in interest expense for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010, when compared with the same quarter in the previous year
(these payments were characterized as dividends prior to the exchange). This negative
effect was partially offset by the conversion of certain trust preferred securities into
common stock, also in August 2009, which reduced the quarterly interest expense by $1.7
million; and |
|
|
|
|
increase in non-performing loans throughout the different loan portfolios, which
balances are depicted in Table K of this MD&A. |
Most loan categories decreased in volume,
especially commercial and construction loan portfolios, due to
lower origination activity and loan charge-offs. The consumer loan portfolio shows a decrease due
to the slowdown in the auto and consumer loan origination activity in Puerto Rico, and the run-off
of E-LOANs home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and closed-end second mortgages. On the positive
side, the covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, that contributed
$4.0 billion in average loan volume during the third quarter of 2010, net of fair value
adjustments, mitigated the decrease in the volume of earning assets. The covered loans, which are
segregated in Table B, contributed $145.6 million to the Corporations interest income during the
quarter ended September 30, 2010. Investment securities decreased in average volume as a result of
maturities and prepayments of mortgage-related investment securities, which funds were not
reinvested due in part to deleveraging strategies, and to the sale of certain investment securities
during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, which resulted in a net gain of $3.7 million before
taxes for the quarter.
Also affecting net interest income is the increase in the volume of medium and long-term debt,
particularly the note payable issued to the FDIC. Despite the deposits acquired on the
FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporations deposit volume has declined, mainly time deposits,
including brokered certificates of deposits, due to deleveraging in the U.S. mainland operations,
which was driven by a reduction in the earning assets funded by such deposits.
As shown in Table C, net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 had a positive variance of 47 basis points mostly due to the interest income on
covered loans and a lower cost of funds, mainly deposits associated to both a lower interest rate
scenario and management actions to reduce the cost of deposits, partially offset by the decrease in
volume of earning assets, mainly commercial loans. The decrease in the taxable equivalent
adjustment for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared with the previous year, relates
to the fact that there were no benefits associated to BPPRs tax-exempt assets during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as explained above.
110
TABLE C
Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Continuing Operations
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Average Volume |
|
Average Yields / Costs |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Attributable to |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
$ |
1,558 |
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
(0.42 |
%) |
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
4,326 |
|
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
|
|
($2,701 |
) |
|
|
($2,476 |
) |
|
|
($225 |
) |
|
6,541 |
|
|
7,578 |
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
|
(0.88 |
) |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
185,436 |
|
|
|
264,553 |
|
|
|
(79,117 |
) |
|
|
(44,078 |
) |
|
|
(35,039 |
) |
|
462 |
|
|
660 |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
6.81 |
|
|
|
6.75 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
Trading securities |
|
|
23,556 |
|
|
|
33,362 |
|
|
|
(9,806 |
) |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
(10,094 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,561 |
|
|
9,432 |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
|
(0.99 |
) |
|
Total money market, investments and trading securities |
|
|
213,318 |
|
|
|
304,942 |
|
|
|
(91,624 |
) |
|
|
(46,266 |
) |
|
|
(45,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
15,395 |
|
|
(1,844 |
) |
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
490,346 |
|
|
|
572,368 |
|
|
|
(82,022 |
) |
|
|
(21,568 |
) |
|
|
(60,454 |
) |
|
638 |
|
|
798 |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
8.71 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
41,705 |
|
|
|
50,041 |
|
|
|
(8,336 |
) |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
(10,343 |
) |
|
4,588 |
|
|
4,491 |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
(0.56 |
) |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
207,139 |
|
|
|
221,490 |
|
|
|
(14,351 |
) |
|
|
(19,054 |
) |
|
|
4,703 |
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
4,418 |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
|
9.88 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
301,401 |
|
|
|
326,904 |
|
|
|
(25,503 |
) |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
(32,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,675 |
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
Sub-total loans |
|
|
1,040,591 |
|
|
|
1,170,803 |
|
|
|
(130,212 |
) |
|
|
(31,315 |
) |
|
|
(98,897 |
) |
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
Covered loans |
|
|
187,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,951 |
|
|
25,102 |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,227,870 |
|
|
|
1,170,803 |
|
|
|
57,067 |
|
|
|
(31,315 |
) |
|
|
88,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,512 |
|
|
$34,534 |
|
|
($1,022 |
) |
|
|
5.74 |
% |
|
|
5.71 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
Total earning assets |
|
$ |
1,441,188 |
|
|
$ |
1,475,745 |
|
|
|
($34,557 |
) |
|
|
($77,581 |
) |
|
$ |
43,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,998 |
|
|
$4,809 |
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
(0.33 |
%) |
|
NOW and money market* |
|
$ |
30,628 |
|
|
$ |
41,437 |
|
|
|
($10,809 |
) |
|
|
($11,998 |
) |
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
5,881 |
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
Savings |
|
|
40,273 |
|
|
|
40,979 |
|
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
12,405 |
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
(0.94 |
) |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
199,018 |
|
|
|
313,016 |
|
|
|
(113,998 |
) |
|
|
(78,777 |
) |
|
|
(35,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,846 |
|
|
22,759 |
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
(0.67 |
) |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
269,919 |
|
|
|
395,432 |
|
|
|
(125,513 |
) |
|
|
(93,854 |
) |
|
|
(31,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
45,756 |
|
|
|
53,476 |
|
|
|
(7,720 |
) |
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
(9,888 |
) |
|
5,109 |
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
(1.06 |
) |
|
Medium and long-term debt |
|
|
184,117 |
|
|
|
133,858 |
|
|
|
50,259 |
|
|
|
39,692 |
|
|
|
10,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,369 |
|
|
28,781 |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
|
499,792 |
|
|
|
582,766 |
|
|
|
(82,974 |
) |
|
|
(51,994 |
) |
|
|
(30,980 |
) |
|
4,638 |
|
|
4,269 |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
1,484 |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other sources of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,512 |
|
|
$34,534 |
|
|
($1,022 |
) |
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
(0.27 |
%) |
|
Total source of funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income on a
taxable equivalent basis |
|
|
941,396 |
|
|
|
892,979 |
|
|
|
48,417 |
|
|
|
($25,587 |
) |
|
$ |
74,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
|
61,044 |
|
|
|
(54,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
934,811 |
|
|
$ |
831,935 |
|
|
$ |
102,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based
on the proportion of the change in each category.
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto
Rico. |
111
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses totaled $215.0 million, or 87% of net charge-offs, for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared with $331.1 million, or 123% of net charge-offs, for the
third quarter of 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the provision for loan losses
totaled $657.5 million, or 97% of net charge-offs, compared with $1.1 billion, or 145% of net
charge-offs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
As indicated in the Overview section, the decrease in the provision for loan losses for the quarter
and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared with the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, was mainly the result of higher amounts provisioned during 2009, particularly
for commercial and construction loans, U.S. mainland non-conventional residential mortgage loans
and home equity lines of credit, combined with specific reserves recorded for loans considered
impaired. The deteriorated conditions of the Puerto Rico and U.S. economies that prevailed during
2009, declines in property values, and the slowdown in consumer spending, negatively impacted the
Corporations net charge-offs and non-performing assets levels, thus requiring substantial reserve
increases in 2009. Since September 30, 2009, loans held-in-portfolio, excluding the covered loans
of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, decreased by approximately $2.3 billion, particularly
commercial, construction and consumer loan portfolios. This decrease in the loan portfolio also
contributed to the lower level of provision for loan losses for the third quarter of 2010.
As indicated previously, the covered loans were recognized at fair value upon acquisition. Based on
managements analysis, there was no need to establish an allowance for loan losses for the covered
loans from the acquisition date to September 30, 2010. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan
Quality section of this MD&A for a discussion on net charge-offs, non-performing assets and the
allowance for loan losses.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Refer to Table D for a breakdown on non-interest income by major categories for the quarters
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
TABLE D
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
48,608 |
|
|
$ |
54,208 |
|
|
|
($5,600 |
) |
|
$ |
149,865 |
|
|
$ |
161,412 |
|
|
|
($11,547 |
) |
|
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debit card fees |
|
|
27,711 |
|
|
|
26,986 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
83,480 |
|
|
|
80,867 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
Credit card fees and discounts |
|
|
24,382 |
|
|
|
23,497 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
73,692 |
|
|
|
70,951 |
|
|
|
2,741 |
|
Processing fees |
|
|
15,258 |
|
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
43,390 |
|
|
|
40,773 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
Insurance fees |
|
|
11,855 |
|
|
|
11,463 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
34,929 |
|
|
|
36,014 |
|
|
|
(1,085 |
) |
Sale and administration of
investment products |
|
|
11,379 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
28,791 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
|
|
3,587 |
|
Mortgage servicing fees, net of
fair value adjustments |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
(3,563 |
) |
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
18,301 |
|
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
Trust fees |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
5,397 |
|
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
15,930 |
|
|
|
17,110 |
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
Total other service fees |
|
|
100,822 |
|
|
|
97,614 |
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
|
305,867 |
|
|
|
298,584 |
|
|
|
7,283 |
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments
of investment securities |
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
(9,059 |
) |
|
|
12,791 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
220,792 |
|
|
|
(216,582 |
) |
Trading account profit |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
7,579 |
|
|
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
31,241 |
|
|
|
(23,140 |
) |
Loss on sale of loans, including adjustments
to indemnity reserves, and valuation
adjustments on loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
|
7,155 |
|
|
|
(23,106 |
) |
|
|
(35,994 |
) |
|
|
12,888 |
|
FDIC loss share expense |
|
|
(36,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,936 |
) |
|
|
(13,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,602 |
) |
Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument |
|
|
10,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,641 |
|
|
|
35,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,035 |
|
Gain on sale of processing and technology
business |
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,802 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
24,568 |
|
|
|
18,430 |
|
|
|
6,138 |
|
|
|
63,076 |
|
|
|
44,579 |
|
|
|
18,497 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
796,524 |
|
|
$ |
160,044 |
|
|
$ |
636,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,170,248 |
|
|
$ |
720,614 |
|
|
$ |
449,634 |
|
|
112
The increase in non-interest income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
when compared with the same periods of the previous year, was principally due to the gain of $640.8
million, before tax and transaction costs, recognized on the sale of the 51% ownership interest in
the Corporations processing and technology business, EVERTEC.
Also impacting the favorable variance in non-interest income for the quarter ended September 30,
2010, when compared with the same quarter of the previous year, were higher gains on sales of
investment securities by $3.5 million. Also, results for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
included $9.3 million in write-downs on equity securities available-for-sale and tax credit
investments classified as other investment securities in the consolidated statement of condition.
Moreover, there were $10.6 million and $35.0 million in favorable changes in the fair value of the
equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC during the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, due to a decline in value in the Corporations common stock since
the equity appreciation instrument was issued to September 30, 2010, a reduction in the assumption
of volatility related to the Corporations stock price and a shorter period remaining for the
expiration of the instrument.
In addition, there were lower losses on sales of loans, net of lower of cost of market valuation
adjustment on loans held-for-sale, by $7.2 million and $12.9 million for the quarter and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2009.
Contributing to the favorable variance for the quarter were higher gains of $3.0 million recorded
by the Corporations mortgage banking business related to residential mortgage loans securitized
and $8.8 million in lower indemnity reserve adjustments in the BPNA reportable segment and PFH,
partially offset by higher indemnity reserve adjustments in the BPPR reportable segment by $4.2
million. Contributing to the favorable variance for the nine-month period were higher gains of
$13.2 million recorded by the Corporations mortgage banking business related to residential
mortgage loans securitized, $35.1 million in lower indemnity reserve adjustments in the BPNA
reportable segment and PFH, partially offset by higher indemnity reserve adjustments in the BPPR
reportable segment by $31.9 million.
The increase in provisioning for the indemnity reserve in the BPPR reportable segment for the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was associated to mortgage loans that had been
previously sold with credit recourse by the BPPR reportable segment. This indemnity reserve
adjustment was driven by increased foreclosure rates, repurchases, delinquency trends and loss
severity levels experienced during 2010. The decrease in provisioning for the indemnity reserves at
the BPNA reportable segment corresponded principally to lower volume of disbursements, reduced loss
severities and the expiration of indemnification terms under standard representation and warranty
arrangements, including a reduction of $18.8 million related to loans previously sold by E-LOAN and
$16.1 million related to loans sold by Popular Equipment Finance during 2009.
These favorable variances were partially offset by $36.9 million and $13.6 million in losses in the
caption of FDIC loss share expense for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
respectively. These losses resulted from a reduction in the indemnification asset by $71.6 million
resulting principally from the Corporations application of reciprocal accounting for covered loans
accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving characteristics, for which 80% of
the losses are covered by the FDIC under loss share agreements. By accreting into interest income
the discount on accruing loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-20, the carrying basis
increases. With reciprocal accounting, the Corporation was required to reduce the indemnification
asset by approximately 80% of the loan discount accreted, and thus record a reduction in
non-interest income. The above $71.6 million decrease was partially offset by higher accretion of
the indemnification asset, which amounted to $34.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
and $58.0 million for the period from April 30, 2010 through September 30, 2010. The time value of
money incorporated into the present value computation of the indemnification asset is accreted into
earnings over the life of the loss sharing agreements.
In addition, service charges on deposit accounts for the quarter and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2010 decreased by $5.6 million and $11.5 million, respectively, when compared with
the same periods in 2009, mostly in the BPNA reportable segment related to lower non-sufficient
funds fees and
reduced fees from money services clients.
113
Also offsetting the favorable variances during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 were
$182.7 million in gains derived from the sale of $3.4 billion in U.S. Treasury notes and U.S.
agencies during the first quarter of 2009 by BPPR and $52.3 million in gains from the sale of
equity securities in the second quarter of 2009 by BPPR and EVERTEC. The impact of these 2009
events, were partially offset by $15.8 million in write-downs on equity securities
available-for-sale and tax credit investments classified as other investment securities during the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009.
The decrease in trading account profit by $23.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, when compared with the same period of the previous year, was mostly related to $43.7 million
in lower realized gains as a result of a lower volume of mortgage-backed securities sold, partially
offset by $16.4 million in higher unrealized gains of outstanding mortgage-backed securities.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Table E provides a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories.
TABLE E
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Personnel costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
116,426 |
|
|
$ |
102,822 |
|
|
$ |
13,604 |
|
|
$ |
321,423 |
|
|
$ |
315,224 |
|
|
$ |
6,199 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
24,779 |
|
|
|
27,725 |
|
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
78,746 |
|
|
|
96,820 |
|
|
|
(18,074 |
) |
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
141,205 |
|
|
|
130,547 |
|
|
|
10,658 |
|
|
|
400,169 |
|
|
|
412,044 |
|
|
|
(11,875 |
) |
Net occupancy expenses |
|
|
28,425 |
|
|
|
28,269 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
86,359 |
|
|
|
80,734 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
25,432 |
|
|
|
24,983 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
74,231 |
|
|
|
76,289 |
|
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
13,872 |
|
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
38,635 |
|
|
|
39,369 |
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
Professional fees |
|
|
48,224 |
|
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
19,530 |
|
|
|
109,498 |
|
|
|
80,643 |
|
|
|
28,855 |
|
Communications |
|
|
9,514 |
|
|
|
11,902 |
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
31,628 |
|
|
|
36,115 |
|
|
|
(4,487 |
) |
Business promotion |
|
|
11,260 |
|
|
|
8,905 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
29,759 |
|
|
|
26,761 |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
2,857 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
7,898 |
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
FDIC deposit insurance |
|
|
17,183 |
|
|
|
16,506 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
49,894 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
(12,060 |
) |
Loss (gain) on early
extinguishment of debt |
|
|
25,448 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
104,752 |
|
|
|
26,426 |
|
|
|
(79,304 |
) |
|
|
105,730 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
45,697 |
|
|
|
31,753 |
|
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
|
119,464 |
|
|
|
104,955 |
|
|
|
14,509 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,218 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
371,547 |
|
|
$ |
220,600 |
|
|
$ |
150,947 |
|
|
$ |
980,876 |
|
|
$ |
855,442 |
|
|
$ |
125,434 |
|
|
Other operating expenses for the quarter and nine months ended included a $15.8 million
prepayment penalty on the repurchase and cancellation of $175 million in term notes in July 2010.
Also, the Corporation incurred $9.7 million in prepayment penalties during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 on the cancellation of $180 million of FHLB advances and $54 million in public
fund certificates of deposit as part of BPNAs deployment of excess liquidity and as part of a
strategy to increase margin in future periods. The third quarter of 2009 included a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $79.3 million, principally derived from the exchange of trust preferred
securities for common stock.
Also, the increase in operating expenses was due to approximately $24.6 million in transaction
costs related to the EVERTEC transaction.
Furthermore, salaries from full time equivalent employees retained from Westernbank operations, as
discussed in the Overview section, as well as headcount retained on a temporary basis, was the
principal contributor to the increase in personnel costs for the quarter September 30, 2010 when
compared with the same quarter in 2009. The decrease in personnel costs for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, compared with the same period in 2009 was due to a reduction in salaries in the
BPNA reportable segment due to restructuring and staff reductions during 2009 and a decrease in
pension costs due to the plan freeze, partially offset by the salaries from Westernbank employees.
Refer to Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the pension and
postretirement costs.
114
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense amounted to $102.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
compared with income tax expense of $6.3 million for the same quarter of 2009. The increase in
income tax expense was primarily due to higher income before tax on the Puerto Rico operations,
lower exempt interest income net of disallowance of expenses attributed to such exempt income and
an increase in non-deductible interest expense related to the Trust Preferred issued to the US
Treasury in August 2009, as to which the Corporation agreed with the US Treasury not to deduct
interest payments for tax purposes. These trust preferred securities are described in Note 17 to
the consolidated financial statements. This increase was partially offset by an increase in income
subject to preferential tax rate mainly driven by the gain on the sale of EVERTEC.
The components of income tax for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
244,423 |
|
|
|
40.95 |
% |
|
|
($47,186 |
) |
|
|
40.95 |
% |
Net reversal (benefit) of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
(11,895 |
) |
|
|
10.32 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(149,325 |
) |
|
|
(25.02 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
9,746 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
58,480 |
|
|
|
(50.75 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
(2.42 |
) |
Difference in tax rates due to multiple
jurisdictions |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
8,579 |
|
|
|
(7.44 |
) |
State taxes and others |
|
|
(15,946 |
) |
|
|
(2.67 |
) |
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
102,388 |
|
|
|
17.15 |
% |
|
$ |
6,331 |
|
|
|
(5.49 |
%) |
|
Although the Corporation reported a net income before income tax of $596.9 million, it
recognized an income tax expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of $102.4 million. This
is in part the result of calculating the tax on the sale of EVERTEC at a preferential tax rate.
Income tax expense amounted to $113.1 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010,
compared with an income tax benefit of $15.2 million for the same period in 2009. The increase was
principally due to higher income before tax in the Puerto Rico operations, lower net exempt
interest income and an increase in non-deductible interest expense related to the trust preferred
securities issued to the U.S. Treasury as compared to the same period of 2009.
Also, in 2009 a temporary five-percent special surtax was imposed on all corporations doing
business in Puerto Rico, resulting in an income tax benefit as a consequence of adjusting the
deferred tax assets to reflect the increase in tax rate.
115
The components of income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
% of pre-tax |
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Amount |
|
income |
|
Computed income tax at statutory rates |
|
$ |
191,118 |
|
|
|
40.95 |
% |
|
|
($145,752 |
) |
|
|
40.95 |
% |
Benefits of net tax exempt interest income |
|
|
(5,828 |
) |
|
|
(1.25 |
) |
|
|
(38,751 |
) |
|
|
10.89 |
|
Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate |
|
|
(150,431 |
) |
|
|
(32.23 |
) |
|
|
(59,298 |
) |
|
|
16.66 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
|
71,582 |
|
|
|
15.34 |
|
|
|
203,709 |
|
|
|
(57.23 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
20,958 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
(0.79 |
) |
Difference in tax rates due to multiple
jurisdictions |
|
|
6,371 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
31,252 |
|
|
|
(8.78 |
) |
State taxes and others |
|
|
(20,669 |
) |
|
|
(4.43 |
) |
|
|
(9,157 |
) |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
113,101 |
|
|
|
24.23 |
% |
|
|
($15,209 |
) |
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
Refer to Note 27 to the consolidated financial statements for a breakdown of the Corporations
deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2010.
REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS
The Corporations reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de
Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America (as defined in Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements). A Corporate group has been defined to support the
reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the Corporate group
are not allocated to the reportable segments.
As a result of the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC described in the Overview section, the
Corporation no longer presents EVERTEC as a reportable segment and therefore, historical financial
information for EVERTEC, including the merchant acquiring business that was part of the BPPR
reportable segment, has been reclassified under Corporate for all periods discussed.
For a description of the Corporations reportable segments, including additional financial
information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 29 to the consolidated
financial statements.
The Corporate group had net income of $496.5 million for the third quarter of 2010, compared with
net income of $65.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, and net income of $472.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared with $53.1 million for the same
period in the previous year. The variance in the year-to-date results for the corporate group was
principally due to:
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $658.9 million, principally due to the gain on sale of the
processing and technology business in the third quarter of 2010; |
|
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $119.6 million which were impacted by $15.8 million in
losses on early extinguishment of debt related to the cancellation of $175 million in
medium term notes of the bank holding company and $24.6 million in transaction costs related
to the EVERTEC sale during the third quarter of 2010, compared with gains of $78.3 million
associated to the extinguishment of junior subordinated debentures during the third quarter
of 2009 as part of the exchange of trust preferred securities for shares of common stock of
the Corporation; and |
|
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $89.1 million principally due to higher taxable income
resulting from the gain on the sale of the processing and technology business. |
Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below.
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment reported net income of $12.5 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared with a net loss of $13.5 million for the same quarter of
2009. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results for the third
quarter of 2010, when compared with the same
116
quarter of the previous year, included the following:
|
|
|
higher net interest income by $118.8 million, or 55%, mainly as a result of the $78.5
million discount accretion on covered loans acquired from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving
characteristics and the $56.5 million discount accretion on covered loans accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-30. The BPPR reportable segments net interest yield was adversely
impacted by funding the FDIC loss share indemnification asset, a non-interest earning
asset, with interest bearing liabilities, mainly through the note issued to the FDIC. The
BPPR reportable segment had a net interest margin of 5.32% for the quarter ended September
30, 2010, compared with 3.88% for the same quarter in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
higher provision for loan losses by $28.8 million, or 19%. The provision for loan losses
represented 120% of net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2010, compared with 109% of
net charge-offs for the same quarter of 2009. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to
loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR reportable segment was 4.89%
as of September 30, 2010, when compared with 4.31% as of the same date in 2009.
Non-performing loans, excluding covered loans, in this reportable segment totaled $1.7
billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $1.4 billion at the same date in 2009,
mainly related to construction and mortgage loans. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and
Loan Quality section of this MD&A for certain credit quality indicators corresponding to
the BPPR reportable segment; |
|
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $16.1 million, or 15%, mainly due to $36.9 million in
losses in the caption of FDIC loss share expense, partially offset by $10.6 million in
favorable changes in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the
FDIC, which is explained in the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A; |
|
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $34.9 million, or 19%, mainly due to higher personnel
costs, professional fees and other operating expenses. The increase in personnel costs was
mainly due to the new hires from Westernbank while the increase in other operating expenses
was mostly due to losses associated with write-downs in other real estate property; and |
|
|
|
|
higher income tax expense by $12.9 million, primarily due to higher income before tax on
the Puerto Rico operations, lower exempt interest income net of disallowance of expenses
attributed to such exempt income and an increase in non-deductible interest expense related
to the trust preferred securities issued to the U.S. Treasury in August 2009, which the
Corporation agreed with the U.S. Treasury not to deduct interest payments for tax purposes. |
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $58.5 million, compared with $167.6
million for the same period in the previous year. These results reflected:
|
|
|
higher net interest income by $137.2 million, or 21%; |
|
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $73.6 million, or 15%; |
|
|
|
|
lower non-interest income by $234.5 million, or 42%, which was mainly due to $227.2
million in gains from the sale of U.S. Treasury notes, U.S. agencies, and equity securities
during 2009; a reduction in the indemnification asset of $71.6 million resulting
principally from the Corporations application of reciprocal accounting for covered loans
accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 due to their revolving characteristics; higher
adjustments to indemnity reserves by $31.9 million; and lower trading account profit by
$23.1 million mainly in the mortgage banking business, partially offset by higher accretion
of the indemnification asset by $58.0 million; $35.0 million in favorable changes in the
fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC; and higher gains of
$13.2 million recorded by the Corporations mortgage banking business related to
residential mortgage loans securitized during 2010; |
|
|
|
|
higher operating expenses by $54.7 million, or 10%, principally related to the
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction; and |
|
|
|
|
income tax expense of $26.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to an income tax benefit of $4.2 million for the same period in the previous year,
mostly as a result of the same factors discussed for the quarter. The income tax benefit in
2009 was due to a temporary five-percent special surtax imposed on all corporations doing
business in Puerto Rico, which resulted in an income tax benefit as a consequence of
adjusting the deferred tax assets to reflect the increase in tax rate. |
117
Banco Popular North America
Banco Popular North America reportable segment, which includes the operations of E-LOAN, reported a
net loss of $14.6 million for the third quarter of 2010, a decrease of $155.3 million, or 91%, when
compared with a net loss of $169.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The principal
factors that contributed to the variance in results for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, when
compared with the same quarter in the previous year, included:
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $144.9 million, or 82%, prompted by credit quality
indicators that reflect signs of stabilization in the U.S. operations. This decrease in the
provision for loan losses was mainly the result of higher amounts provisioned during 2009
particularly for commercial and construction loans, U.S. mainland non-conventional
residential mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages,
combined with specific reserves recorded for loans considered impaired. Substantial
reserve increases were recorded during 2009 as a result of the deteriorated conditions of
the U.S. economy, declines in property values, and the slowdown in consumer spending. The
U.S. real estate market has shown some improvement and stabilization in collateral values
during 2010. The decrease of approximately $1.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio since
September 30, 2009, particularly in the commercial, construction, consumer and mortgage
loan portfolios, also contributed to the lower level of provision for loan losses for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010. Net charge-offs for the BPNA reportable segment for the
third quarter of 2010 decreased $33.3 million, or 26%, compared with the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, primarily in the construction, consumer, and mortgage loan portfolio.
The provision for loan losses represented 34% of net charge-offs for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, compared with 137% of net charge-offs for the same period of the
previous year. The allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio in this reportable
segment was 7.07% as of September 30, 2010, compared with 6.05% as of September 30, 2009.
Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for certain
credit quality indicators corresponding to the BPNA reportable segment; |
|
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $6.8 million, mainly due to lower provisioning in
indemnity reserves on loans sold in previous periods; and |
|
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $3.0 million, or 4%. This variance was principally the
result of lower personnel costs, mainly salaries as a result of downsizing of U.S.
operations; and lower net occupancy expenses, partially offset by $9.7 million in
prepayment penalties during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 on the cancellation of
$180 million of FHLB advances and $54 million in public fund certificates of deposit as
part of BPNAs deployment of excess liquidity and as part of a strategy to increase margin
in future periods. |
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 totaled $176.6 million, compared with a net
loss of $557.6 million for the same period in the previous year. These results reflected:
|
|
|
lower provision for loan losses by $322.0 million, or 57%, mostly as a result of the
same factors discussed for the quarter; |
|
|
|
|
higher non-interest income by $29.8 million principally due to reductions in the
provisioning for indemnity reserves on loans previously sold, which considers factors such
as reduced volume of disbursements and loss severities and expiration of indemnity terms; |
|
|
|
|
lower operating expenses by $41.6 million, or 17%, mainly in personnel costs due to
restructuring and staff reductions and lower FDIC deposit insurance assessments, partially
offset by $9.7 million in prepayment penalties previously discussed; and |
|
|
|
|
income tax expense of $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared with an income tax benefit of $5.7 million for the same period in the previous
year. |
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Assets
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations total assets were $40.8 billion, compared with $34.7
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $35.6 billion as of September 30, 2009. Refer to the
consolidated financial statements included in this report for the Corporations consolidated
statements of condition as of such dates. The increase in total assets from December 31, 2009 to
September 30, 2010 was due to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, which as of the April 30,
2010 transaction date added $8.4 billion in total assets, net of fair value adjustments, to the
118
Corporations financial condition. This increase was offset in part by a reduction in the portfolio
of investment securities and lower volume of loan originations. A negative economic environment has
led to a reluctance to expand or invest, resulting in weak loan demand.
Investment securities
Table F provides a breakdown of the Corporations portfolio of investment securities
available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) on a combined basis as of September 30,
2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009. Also, Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial
statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporations investment securities
AFS and HTM.
TABLE F
Breakdown of Investment Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
65.2 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,397.0 |
|
|
|
1,647.9 |
|
|
|
(250.9 |
) |
|
|
1,694.3 |
|
|
|
(297.3 |
) |
Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political
subdivisions |
|
|
237.9 |
|
|
|
262.8 |
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
271.1 |
|
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations federal agencies |
|
|
1,347.0 |
|
|
|
1,600.2 |
|
|
|
(253.2 |
) |
|
|
1,598.0 |
|
|
|
(251.0 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage obligations private label |
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,782.7 |
|
|
|
3,210.2 |
|
|
|
(427.5 |
) |
|
|
3,445.3 |
|
|
|
(662.6 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
Total investment securities AFS and HTM |
|
$ |
5,955.6 |
|
|
$ |
6,907.7 |
|
|
|
($952.1 |
) |
|
$ |
7,206.2 |
|
|
|
($1,250.6 |
) |
|
The portfolio of investment securities consists primarily of liquid, high quality securities.
The reduction in investment securities from December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009 to September
30, 2010 was mostly impacted by maturities, prepayments and sales. The cash proceeds from these
activities were not fully reinvested as part of a strategy to deleverage the balance sheet.
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities available-for-sale for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 amounted to $396.7 million, with gains of approximately $3.7 million. The
Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction did not contribute significantly to the Corporations
portfolio of investment securities, as the Corporation only acquired FHLB stock as part of the
transaction, which was redeemed in the second quarter of 2010.
As of September 30, 2010, there were investment securities AFS and HTM with a fair value of $154
million in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses on these particular securities
approximated $6.0 million as of September 30, 2010. These figures compare with securities of $1.8
billion with unrealized losses of $31 million as of December 31, 2009. Management performed its
quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2010
and concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation does not have the intent to sell debt securities in an
unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell
those investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis. Notes 9 and 10 to the
consolidated financial statements provide additional information by investment categories of the
unrealized gains / losses with respect to the Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
investment securities portfolio.
Loans
Refer to Table G, for a breakdown of the Corporations loan portfolio, the principal category of
earning assets. Included in Table G are $115 million of loans held-for-sale as of September 30,
2010, compared with $91 million as of December 31, 2009 and $75 million as of September 30, 2009.
Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented in a separate line item in Table
G. Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the covered loans are
significantly different, thus the Corporation has determined to segregate them in the information
included in Table G.
Excluding the acquired covered loans, all loan portfolios as of September 30, 2010, except for
mortgage loans, declined compared with December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009. This generally
reflects weak loan demand, the
high level of loan charge-offs as a result of the downturn in the real estate market and continued
weakened economy,
119
and the exiting or downsizing of certain loan origination channels due to
strategic decisions.
TABLE G
Loans Ending Balances (including loans held-for-sale)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 [1] |
|
2009 |
|
Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing
agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
11,724,536 |
|
|
$ |
12,666,955 |
|
|
|
($942,419 |
) |
|
$ |
13,076,772 |
|
|
|
($1,352,236 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
1,300,469 |
|
|
|
1,724,373 |
|
|
|
(423,904 |
) |
|
|
1,882,069 |
|
|
|
(581,600 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
675,629 |
|
|
|
(62,069 |
) |
|
|
699,350 |
|
|
|
(85,790 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
4,859,206 |
|
|
|
4,691,145 |
|
|
|
168,061 |
|
|
|
4,621,915 |
|
|
|
237,291 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,759,799 |
|
|
|
4,045,807 |
|
|
|
(286,008 |
) |
|
|
4,191,410 |
|
|
|
(431,611 |
) |
|
Total non-covered loans |
|
$ |
22,257,570 |
|
|
$ |
23,803,909 |
|
|
|
($1,546,339 |
) |
|
$ |
24,471,516 |
|
|
|
($2,213,946 |
) |
Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements [2] |
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,006,227 |
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
26,263,797 |
|
|
$ |
23,803,909 |
|
|
$ |
2,459,888 |
|
|
$ |
24,471,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,792,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Loans disclosed exclude the discontinued operations of PFH. |
|
[2] |
|
Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of the loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements. |
The explanations for loan portfolio variances discussed below exclude the impact of the
acquired covered loans.
As of September 30, 2010, the commercial and construction loan portfolios decreased $1.4 billion
when compared to December 31, 2009. The decrease in these portfolios was both reflected in the BPPR
and BPNA reportable segments and was impacted by lower new loan origination activity, portfolio
run-off associated with exited origination channels in the U.S. operations, and loan net
charge-offs during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 that totaled $426.0 million.
The decrease in the consumer loan portfolio from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 by
approximately $286 million, or 7%, was mostly reflected in personal and auto loans in Puerto Rico
and home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages in E-LOAN. Net charge-offs in the
consumer loan portfolio amounted to $163.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Also, portfolio run-off exceeded the volume of new personal and auto loan originations in the BPPR
reportable segment due to current weak economic conditions. Furthermore, the run-off of Popular
Finances loan portfolio contributed to such decrease. Popular Finances operations were closed in
late 2008. Also, there were reductions in the consumer loan portfolio of the BPNA reportable
segment, primarily due to loan charge-offs and the run-off of its auto, closed-end second mortgages
and home equity lines of credit portfolios, which represent business lines exited in prior years.
Consumer loans as of September 30, 2010 decreased significantly from September 30, 2009 as a result
of similar factors. Consumer loans as of September 30, 2010 include $41 million in credit cards
pertaining to BPPRs Westernbank operations and which are not covered by the FDIC under the loss
sharing agreements.
The decline in the lease financing portfolio from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was
mostly at the BPPR reportable segment by $36 million, which as well as the other loan portfolios
continues to reflect the general slowdown in originations. The Corporations U.S. operations are no
longer originating lease financing and as such, the outstanding portfolio in those operations is
running off.
The mortgage loan portfolio as of September 30, 2010 increased $168 million from December 31, 2009.
The BPPR reportable segment showed an increase of $324 million, while the BPNA reportable segment
experienced a reduction of $156 million. The reduction at BPNA resulted principally from the
discontinuance of the non-conventional mortgage loan origination business in the Corporations U.S.
mainland operations. The Corporations mortgage loan origination subsidiary in Puerto Rico, Popular
Mortgage, continued its efforts to originate loans despite the weak economic conditions in the
Island. As indicated in the Overview section of this MD&A, during the third quarter of 2010, the
Puerto Rico government signed into law an aggressive housing incentive package which should help
boost future residential housing sales activity. There is a reduction from September 30, 2009 in
BPNA due to high volume of net charge-offs in the non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio and run-off of the portfolio.
120
The covered loans were initially recorded at fair value. Their carrying value approximated $4.0
billion as of September 30, 2010, of which approximately 67% pertained to commercial and
construction loans, 29% to mortgage loans and 4% to consumer loans. The unpaid principal balance on
the covered loans approximated $8.2 billion as of September 30, 2010. Note 11 to the consolidated
financial statements presents the carrying amount of the covered loans broken down by major loan
type categories. A substantial amount of the covered loans, or approximately $3.7 billion of their
carrying value as of September 30, 2010, is accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30.
Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the covered loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools
based on similar characteristics, including factors such as loan type, interest rate type, accruing
status, and amortization type. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single
composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the
difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value of the
loans, or the accretable yield, is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method
over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool
is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference represents the difference between
undiscounted contractually required principal and interest and the undiscounted cash flows expected
to be collected. The non-accretable difference was established in purchase accounting to absorb
losses expected at the acquisition date on such loans. Amounts absorbed by the non-accretable
difference do not affect the statement of operations or the allowance for loan losses. Loans
charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not
reported as charge-offs. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those
expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in
expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan
losses. The loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30 will be reviewed each reporting period to determine
whether any changes occurred in expected cash flows that would result in a reclassification from
non-accretable difference to accretable yield or in the establishment of an allowance for loan
losses.
The following table presents acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 as of the
April 30, 2010 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually-required principal and interest |
|
$ |
10,995,387 |
|
Non-accretable difference |
|
|
5,789,480 |
|
|
Cash flows expected to be collected |
|
|
5,205,907 |
|
Accretable yield |
|
|
1,303,908 |
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 |
|
$ |
3,901,999 |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Reflects a difference of $11.4 million compared with the amounts disclosed in
the Form 8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010, which included the financial statements and
exhibits pertaining to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at the acquisition
date. The Corporation reassessed the classification of certain acquired loans and, due
to their revolving characteristics, reclassified the loans for accounting purposes from
ASC Subtopic 310-30 to ASC Subtopic 310-20. The reclassification did not impact the fair
value of the loans. |
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the
underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments.
121
Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the acquired loans in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction as of and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010, and which
are accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
(In thousands) |
|
Accretable yield |
|
of loans |
|
Balance as of January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions [1] |
|
$ |
1,303,908 |
|
|
$ |
3,901,999 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
(95,506 |
) |
|
|
95,506 |
|
Payments received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(338,308 |
) |
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,208,402 |
|
|
$ |
3,659,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Represents the estimated fair value of the loans at the date of
acquisition. There were no reclassifications from non-accretable
difference to accretable yield from April 30, 2010 to September 30, 2010. |
As indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation accounts for
lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20,
which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in
excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the
loan, if the loan is accruing interest. The following table presents acquired loans accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-20 as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-20 |
|
$ |
358,989 |
[1] |
Gross contractual amounts receivable (principal and interest) |
|
$ |
1,007,880 |
|
Estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected |
|
$ |
614,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Reflects a difference of $11.4 million compared with the amounts disclosed in the Form
8-K/A filed on July 16, 2010, which included the financial statements and exhibits
pertaining to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction at the acquisition date. The
Corporation reassessed the classification of certain acquired loans and, due to their
revolving characteristics, reclassified the loans for accounting purposes from ASC Subtopic
310-30 to ASC Subtopic 310-20. The reclassification did not impact the fair value of the
loans. |
The cash flows expected to be collected consider the estimated remaining life of the
underlying loans and include the effects of estimated prepayments.
FDIC loss share indemnification asset
As part of the loan portfolio fair value estimation in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction,
the Corporation established the FDIC loss share indemnification asset, which represented the
present value of the estimated losses on loans to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The FDIC loss share
indemnification asset amounted to $3.3 billion as of September 30, 2010 and is presented in a
separate line item in the consolidated statement of condition.
122
Other assets
Table H provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of Other
assets in the consolidated statements of condition as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and
September 30, 2009.
TABLE H
Breakdown of Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vs. |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Net deferred tax assets
(net of valuation allowance) |
|
$ |
336,661 |
|
|
$ |
363,967 |
|
|
|
($27,306 |
) |
|
$ |
380,596 |
|
|
|
($43,935 |
) |
Investments under the equity method |
|
|
292,493 |
|
|
|
99,772 |
|
|
|
192,721 |
|
|
|
97,817 |
|
|
|
194,676 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance program |
|
|
236,824 |
|
|
|
232,387 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
230,579 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment |
|
|
164,190 |
|
|
|
206,308 |
|
|
|
(42,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,190 |
|
Other prepaid expenses |
|
|
91,193 |
|
|
|
130,762 |
|
|
|
(39,569 |
) |
|
|
144,949 |
|
|
|
(53,756 |
) |
Derivative assets |
|
|
85,180 |
|
|
|
71,822 |
|
|
|
13,358 |
|
|
|
81,249 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
Trade receivables from brokers and
counterparties |
|
|
37,996 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
36,892 |
|
|
|
8,275 |
|
|
|
29,721 |
|
Others |
|
|
215,448 |
|
|
|
218,795 |
|
|
|
(3,347 |
) |
|
|
213,256 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
1,459,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,324,917 |
|
|
$ |
135,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,156,721 |
|
|
$ |
303,264 |
|
|
The increase in other assets from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was primarily due to
the 49% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which is being accounted as an investment under the equity
method. Refer to the Overview and Sale of Processing and Technology business section of this MD&A
for a description of the EVERTEC transaction. When compared to September 30, 2009, there was also
an increase in the prepaid FDIC insurance assessment, which represents the unamortized balance of
the FDIC insurance premiums prepaid in 2009, which correspond to years 2010 through 2012.
Deposits and Borrowings
Deposits
A breakdown of the Corporations deposits at period-end is included in Table I.
TABLE I
Deposits Ending Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, 2010 Vs. |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, 2010 Vs. |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Demand deposits * |
|
$ |
6,023,732 |
|
|
$ |
5,066,282 |
|
|
$ |
957,450 |
|
|
$ |
4,894,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,129,223 |
|
Savings, NOW and money
market deposits |
|
|
10,328,457 |
|
|
|
9,635,347 |
|
|
|
693,110 |
|
|
|
9,509,512 |
|
|
|
818,945 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
11,387,855 |
|
|
|
11,223,265 |
|
|
|
164,590 |
|
|
|
11,978,877 |
|
|
|
(591,022 |
) |
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
27,740,044 |
|
|
$ |
25,924,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,815,150 |
|
|
$ |
26,382,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,357,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits. |
Brokered certificates of deposit, which are included as time deposits, amounted to $2.5
billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $2.7 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $2.8
billion as of September 30, 2009.
The increase in demand and saving deposits from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was
principally related to the deposits assumed in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction and to an
increase in deposits in trust held on a short-term basis, principally for payment of government
bonds. The increase in time deposits from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010, was
influenced by an increase in the BPPR reportable segment, in part due to time deposits assumed in
the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, partially offset by a reduction in BPNA due to reduced
levels of deposits gathered through E-LOANs internet platform, the effect of a reduction in the
pricing of
123
these deposits and strategic actions taken that reduced BPNAs asset base considerably. Also, the
decrease in time deposits was associated with a reduction in brokered certificates of deposit.
The increase in demand and savings accounts from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was
principally influenced by similar factors described above. The decrease in time deposits from
September 30, 2009 to the same date in 2010 was due to a reduction in brokered certificates of
deposit of $264 million and a decrease of $1.1 billion in non-brokered time deposits at the BPNA
reportable segment.
Borrowings
The Corporations borrowings amounted to $7.7 billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $5.3
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $5.5 billion as of September 30, 2009. The increase in
borrowings from the end of 2009 to September 30, 2010 was related to the note issued to the FDIC in
relation to the FDIC-assisted transaction, which amounted to $3.3 billion as of September 30, 2010.
The note issued to the FDIC is collateralized by the covered loans (other than certain consumer
loans) and other real estate acquired in the agreement with the FDIC and all proceeds derived from
such assets, including cash inflows from claims to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.
Borrowings under the note bear interest at the per annum rate of 2.50% and is paid monthly. The
Corporation may prepay the note in whole or in part without any penalty subject to certain
notification requirements indicated in the agreement. During the third quarter of 2010, the
Corporation prepaid $2.1 billion of the note issued to the FDIC from funds unrelated to the assets
securing the note. The increase related to the note issued to the FDIC was partially offset by a
reduction of $275 million in repurchase agreements, cancellation of $175 million in term notes,
which had contractual maturities in September 2011, that were repurchased by the Corporation from
holders of record in July 2010, and a reduction of $430 million in advances with the Federal Home
Loan Banks (FHLB). The latter two were in part associated with the Corporations strategy to
extinguish certain high-cost debt. The increase in borrowings from September 30, 2009 to the same
date in 2010 was also influenced by similar factors.
In March 2010, the SECs Division of Corporation Finance sent a letter to certain public companies
requesting information about repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions or other
transactions involving the obligation to repurchase the transferred assets. The letter requests
several disclosures with respect to such transfers that are recorded as sales. In this regard, the
Corporation records all its repurchase transactions as collateralized borrowings rather than as
sales transactions.
Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the
Corporations borrowings as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009. Also,
refer to the Liquidity Risk section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporations
funding sources as of September 30, 2010.
Other liabilities
The increase in other liabilities of $295 million from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010
included two items directly associated to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Such items
included: (1) the equity appreciation instrument described in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction section in this MD&A with a fair value of $17 million as of September 30, 2010, and an
outstanding balance of $120 million of a contingent liability for unfunded loan commitments
recorded at the acquisition date pertaining primarily to commercial and construction loans and
commercial revolving lines of credit. Losses incurred on loan disbursements made under these
unfunded loan commitments may be covered by the FDIC loss sharing agreements provided that the
Corporation complies with specific requirements under such agreements.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity totaled $4.1 billion as of September 30, 2010, compared with $2.5 billion as
of December 31, 2009 and $2.7 billion as of September 30, 2009. Refer to the consolidated
statements of condition and of stockholders equity for information on the composition of
stockholders equity. Also, the disclosures of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), an
integral component of stockholders equity, are included in the consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss. The increase in stockholders equity from December 31, 2009 to September 30,
2010 was due to the issuance of depositary shares and conversion to common stock during the second
quarter of 2010, which contributed with $1.15 billion in additional capital, and the net income
recorded during 2010, principally from the sale of 51% interest in EVERTEC.
124
Included within surplus in stockholders equity as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$402 million corresponding to a statutory reserve fund applicable exclusively to Puerto Rico
banking institutions. This statutory reserve fund totaled $392 million as of September 30, 2009.
The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPRs net
income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve
equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank
must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the
reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico
Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would
preclude BPPR from paying dividends. As of September 30, 2010 and 2009 and December 31, 2009, BPPR
was in compliance with the statutory reserve requirement.
REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking
regulations. As indicated earlier, the EVERTEC transaction improved the Corporations capital
ratios considerably. The regulatory capital ratios and amounts of total risk-based capital, Tier 1
risk-based capital and Tier 1 leverage as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and September
30, 2009 are presented on Table J. As of such dates, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized.
TABLE J
Capital Adequacy Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
Risk-based capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital |
|
$ |
3,928,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,563,915 |
|
|
$ |
2,771,723 |
|
Supplementary (Tier II) capital |
|
|
342,129 |
|
|
|
346,527 |
|
|
|
350,323 |
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
4,270,446 |
|
|
$ |
2,910,442 |
|
|
$ |
3,122,046 |
|
|
Risk-weighted assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet items |
|
$ |
23,263,719 |
|
|
$ |
23,182,230 |
|
|
$ |
23,999,569 |
|
Off-balance sheet items |
|
|
3,158,181 |
|
|
|
2,964,649 |
|
|
|
3,082,839 |
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
26,421,900 |
|
|
$ |
26,146,879 |
|
|
$ |
27,082,408 |
|
|
Average assets |
|
$ |
39,324,765 |
|
|
$ |
34,197,244 |
|
|
$ |
34,958,245 |
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (minimum required 4.00%) |
|
|
14.87 |
% |
|
|
9.81 |
% |
|
|
10.23 |
% |
Total capital (minimum required 8.00%) |
|
|
16.16 |
|
|
|
11.13 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
Leverage ratio * |
|
|
9.99 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All banks are required to have a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted
quarterly average assets, depending on the banks classification.
As of September 30, 2010, the capital adequacy minimum requirement for Popular, Inc. was (in
thousands): Total Capital of $2,113,752, Tier I Capital of $1,056,876, and Tier I Leverage of
$1,179,743 based on a 3% ratio or $1,572,991 based on a 4% ratio according to the Banks
classification. |
In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance, the trust preferred securities
represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 Capital, subject to quantitative
limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1
Capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements
(including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). As of September
30, 2010, the Corporations restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation.
Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier 1 capital. As of December 31, 2009, there
were $7 million of the outstanding trust preferred securities which were disallowed as Tier 1
capital. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be
included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. The Federal Reserve Board revised the
quantitative limit which would limit restricted core capital elements included in the Tier 1
capital of a bank holding company to 25% of the sum of core capital elements (including restricted
core
125
capital elements), net of
goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability. The new limit would be effective on March 31,
2011. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, recently passed
in July 2010, has a provision to effectively phase out the use of trust preferred securities as
Tier 1 capital throughout a five-year period. As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation had $427
million in trust preferred securities (capital securities) that are subject to the phase-out. As of
September 30, 2010, the remaining trust preferred securities corresponded to capital securities
issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, and were
issued prior to October 4, 2010 and thus, are exempt from the Dodd-Frank banking bill provision.
During the 2010 third quarter, the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision revised the Capital Accord (Basel III), which narrows the definition of capital and increases capital requirements
for specific exposures. The new capital requirements will be phased-in over six years beginning in 2013. If these revisions were
adopted currently, the Corporation estimates they would not have a significant impact on our regulatory capital ratios based on our
current understanding of the revisions to capital qualification. We await clarification from our banking regulators on their interpretation
of Basel III and any additional requirements to the stated thresholds.
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio was 8.31% as of September 30, 2010 and 5.40% as of
December 31, 2009. The Corporations Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio was 11.40%
as of September 30, 2010, compared with 6.39% as of December 31, 2009.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP measures.
Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital
adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets,
typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any other
measure calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (GAAP). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common
equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies
reporting measures with similar names.
The table that follows provides a reconciliation of total stockholders equity to tangible common
equity and total assets to tangible assets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share or per share information) |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,109,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,538,817 |
|
Less: Preferred stock |
|
|
(50,160 |
) |
|
|
(50,160 |
) |
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
(665,333 |
) |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
Less: Other intangibles |
|
|
(60,438 |
) |
|
|
(43,803 |
) |
|
Total tangible common equity |
|
$ |
3,333,269 |
|
|
$ |
1,840,505 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
40,820,716 |
|
|
$ |
34,736,325 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
|
(665,333 |
) |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
Less: Other intangibles |
|
|
(60,438 |
) |
|
|
(43,803 |
) |
|
Total tangible assets |
|
$ |
40,094,945 |
|
|
$ |
34,088,173 |
|
|
Tangible common equity to tangible assets |
|
|
8.31 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
Common shares outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,022,686,418 |
|
|
|
639,540,105 |
|
Tangible book value per common share |
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is another non-GAAP measure. Ratios
calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have become a focus of regulators and investors, and
management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common equity assist investors in analyzing the
Corporations capital position. In connection with the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program
(SCAP), the Federal Reserve Board began supplementing its assessment of the capital adequacy of a
bank holding company based on a variation of Tier 1 capital, known as Tier 1 common equity.
Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in
the federal banking regulations, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and
are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to
calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these
non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company,
they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a
substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.
126
The table below reconciles the Corporations total common stockholders equity (GAAP) as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 to Tier 1 common equity as defined by the Federal Reserve
Board, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies (non-GAAP).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,059,040 |
|
|
$ |
2,488,657 |
|
Less: Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax [1] |
|
|
(195,564 |
) |
|
|
(91,068 |
) |
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets [2] |
|
|
(227,576 |
) |
|
|
(179,655 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(665,333 |
) |
|
|
(604,349 |
) |
Other disallowed intangibles |
|
|
(30,045 |
) |
|
|
(18,056 |
) |
Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of all non-financial equity investments |
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
Add: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax and accumulated net gains (losses)
on cash flow hedges [3] |
|
|
74,301 |
|
|
|
78,488 |
|
|
Total Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
3,013,233 |
|
|
$ |
1,671,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
In accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, Tier 1 capital
excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities
and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily
determinable fair values. In arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are
required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity
securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. |
|
[2] |
|
Approximately $134 million of the Corporations $337 million of net deferred tax assets as of September
30, 2010 ($186 million and $364 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2009), were included without
limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $228
million of such assets as of September 30, 2010 ($180 million as of December 31, 2009) exceeded the
limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as disallowed deferred tax assets, were deducted in
arriving at Tier 1 capital. The remaining $25 million of the Corporations other net deferred tax assets
as of September 30, 2010 ($2 million as of December 31, 2009) represented primarily the following items
(a) the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which
are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to
limitation under the guidelines; (b) the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability
adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income; and (c) the deferred tax liability
associated with goodwill and other intangibles. |
|
[3] |
|
The Federal Reserve Bank has granted interim capital relief for the impact of pension liability adjustment. |
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND LOAN QUALITY
Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest,
renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including
certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table K.
The Corporations non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are
as follows:
|
|
|
Commercial and construction loans recognition of interest income on commercial and
construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on
payments of principal or interest, or when other factors indicate that the collection of
principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions on these loans are charged-off at
no longer than 365 days past due. |
|
|
|
|
Lease financing recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when
loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in
arrears. |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is generally
discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or
interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days
past due. |
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and
home-equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears
on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer
loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end
consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-
end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 180 days in arrears. |
127
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) Loans classified as TDRs are reported in
non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification.
The TDR loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a
willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of
sustained performance after classified as a TDR). |
|
|
|
|
Acquired covered loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are restructured
after acquisition are not considered restructured loans for purposes of the Corporations
accounting and disclosure if the loans are accounted for in pools pursuant to ASC Subtopic
310-30. |
|
|
|
|
As previously indicated in this MD&A and notes to the accompanying financial statements,
covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of
credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with
ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into
pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset
with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The
covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not
considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is
a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be
collected. Also, loans charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in
purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs will be recorded only to
the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates. |
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which
requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in
excess of the Corporations initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest
income using the effective yield method over the life of the loan. Loans accounted for
under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed on non-accrual status when past due in accordance with
the Corporations non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued. |
Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and the loss
protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the Corporation has
determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude such covered loans to
facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across quarters or year-to-date periods.
Given the significant amount of acquired loans that are past due but still accruing due to the
accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation believes the inclusion of these loans in
certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or denominator (or both) results in significant
distortion to these ratios. In addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are
recorded against the nonaccretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans
is lower for portfolios that have significant amounts of acquired loans. The inclusion of these
loans in the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across quarters or years,
and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by
acquisition accounting. The Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality measures
excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator provides better
perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio.
128
TABLE K
Non-Performing Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
As a percentage |
|
|
September 30, |
|
of loans HIP |
|
December 31, |
|
of loans HIP |
|
September 30, |
|
of loans HIP |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
by category [2] |
|
2009 |
|
by category |
|
2009 |
|
by category |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
784,304 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
$ |
836,728 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
$ |
776,027 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
818,186 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
854,937 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
768,987 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
669,175 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
510,847 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
484,219 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
65,906 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
64,185 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
75,992 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
Total non-performing loans,
excluding covered loans |
|
|
2,344,049 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
2,276,352 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
2,115,534 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Other real estate owned (OREO),
excluding covered OREO |
|
|
168,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets,
excluding covered assets |
|
|
2,512,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,401,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,245,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Covered loans and OREO [1] |
|
|
200,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
2,713,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,401,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,245,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days
or more [3] |
|
$ |
296,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
239,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
202,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios excluding covered loans
and OREO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total
assets |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans |
|
|
53.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios including covered loans
and OREO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total
assets |
|
|
6.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans |
|
|
50.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIP = |
|
held-in-portfolio |
|
[1] |
|
The amount consists of $123 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $78 million in covered OREO. It excludes covered loans accounted
for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the
remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses. |
|
[2] |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio used in the computation exclude $4.0 billion in covered loans as of September 30, 2010. |
|
[3] |
|
The carrying value of covered loans accounted for under ASC
Sub-topic 310-30 that are contractually 90 days or more past due
was $738 million as of September 30, 2010. This
amount is excluded from the above table as the covered loans accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status. |
As of September 30, 2010, non-performing loans secured by real estate, excluding covered
loans, amounted to $1.6 billion, or 17.44% of total loans secured by real estate, excluding covered
loans, in the Puerto Rico operations and $607 million or 10.41%, respectively, in the U.S. mainland
operations. These figures compare to $1.3 billion or 14.92% in the Puerto Rico operations and $697
million or 10.69% in the U.S. mainland operations as of December 31, 2009.
In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table K, as of September 30, 2010, there were
$318 million of performing loans, excluding covered loans, which in managements opinion are
currently subject to potential future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired,
compared with $248 million as of December 31, 2009 and $233 million as of September 30, 2009.
Table L summarizes the detail of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including
charge-offs and recoveries by loan category, for the quarters and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009.
129
TABLE L
Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Variance |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,277,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,146,239 |
|
|
$ |
130,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
|
$ |
882,807 |
|
|
$ |
378,397 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
215,013 |
|
|
|
331,063 |
|
|
|
(116,050 |
) |
|
|
657,471 |
|
|
|
1,053,036 |
|
|
|
(395,565 |
) |
Losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
109,239 |
|
|
|
64,238 |
|
|
|
45,001 |
|
|
|
279,440 |
|
|
|
187,874 |
|
|
|
91,566 |
|
Construction |
|
|
75,918 |
|
|
|
96,495 |
|
|
|
(20,577 |
) |
|
|
184,216 |
|
|
|
217,990 |
|
|
|
(33,774 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
3,205 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
(2,296 |
) |
|
|
12,953 |
|
|
|
16,650 |
|
|
|
(3,697 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
23,722 |
|
|
|
36,143 |
|
|
|
(12,421 |
) |
|
|
80,250 |
|
|
|
92,906 |
|
|
|
(12,656 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
60,567 |
|
|
|
84,608 |
|
|
|
(24,041 |
) |
|
|
193,750 |
|
|
|
260,699 |
|
|
|
(66,949 |
) |
|
Total losses |
|
|
272,651 |
|
|
|
286,985 |
|
|
|
(14,334 |
) |
|
|
750,609 |
|
|
|
776,119 |
|
|
|
(25,510 |
) |
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
8,944 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
|
|
28,890 |
|
|
|
17,546 |
|
|
|
11,344 |
|
Construction |
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
|
|
8,776 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
8,069 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
3,949 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
1,433 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
7,742 |
|
|
|
8,018 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
30,077 |
|
|
|
22,983 |
|
|
|
7,094 |
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
24,616 |
|
|
|
17,084 |
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
75,928 |
|
|
|
47,677 |
|
|
|
28,251 |
|
|
Net loans charged-off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
100,295 |
|
|
|
59,114 |
|
|
|
41,181 |
|
|
|
250,550 |
|
|
|
170,328 |
|
|
|
80,222 |
|
Construction |
|
|
70,446 |
|
|
|
95,941 |
|
|
|
(25,495 |
) |
|
|
175,440 |
|
|
|
217,283 |
|
|
|
(41,843 |
) |
Lease financing |
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
3,934 |
|
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
9,004 |
|
|
|
13,012 |
|
|
|
(4,008 |
) |
Mortgage |
|
|
22,490 |
|
|
|
34,322 |
|
|
|
(11,832 |
) |
|
|
76,014 |
|
|
|
90,103 |
|
|
|
(14,089 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
52,825 |
|
|
|
76,590 |
|
|
|
(23,765 |
) |
|
|
163,673 |
|
|
|
237,716 |
|
|
|
(74,043 |
) |
|
Total net loans charged-off |
|
|
248,035 |
|
|
|
269,901 |
|
|
|
(21,866 |
) |
|
|
674,681 |
|
|
|
728,442 |
|
|
|
(53,761 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
1,243,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
|
$ |
36,593 |
|
|
$ |
1,243,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
|
$ |
36,593 |
|
|
Ratios excluding covered loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
0.87 |
x |
|
|
1.23 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.97 |
x |
|
|
1.45 |
x |
|
|
|
|
Ratios including covered loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
0.87 |
x |
|
|
1.23x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.97x |
|
|
|
1.45x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
There was no need to record an allowance for loan losses on the covered loans as of September 30, 2010.
130
Table M presents annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio by loan
category for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
TABLE M
Annualized Net Charge-offs to Average Loans Held-in-Portfolio, Excluding Covered Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Quarters ended September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
20.11 |
|
|
|
19.45 |
|
|
|
15.18 |
|
|
|
13.83 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
Total annualized net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
4.52 |
% |
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
Note: Average loans held-in-portfolio exclude covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction which were recorded at fair value on date of
acquisition, and thus, considered a credit discount component. The Westernbank acquired loan portfolio did not impact net charge-offs for the quarter and nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
Commercial loans
As shown in Table K, the level of non-performing commercial loans as of September 30, 2010,
compared to December 31, 2009, decreased on a consolidated basis from December 31, 2009, mainly in
the BPNA reportable segment. This decrease was attributed mainly to the mainland U.S. commercial
real estate portfolio which has reflected signs of stabilization. As shown in the next table, the
level of non-performing commercial loans in the Puerto Rico operations as of September 30, 2010 has
remained high, when compared with the end of 2009, due to continued weak economic conditions. The
level of non-performing commercial loans in the United States operations has shown improved
performance from December 31, 2009. As compared to December 31, 2009, the percentage of
non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans held-in-portfolio as of September 30, 2010
increased in the BPPR reportable segment influenced by the significant loan portfolio reduction and
sustained high level of delinquencies.
The increase in non-performing commercial loans from September 30, 2009 to the same date in 2010
was principally due to Puerto Ricos recessionary economy, particularly during 2009. The table that
follows provides information on commercial non-performing loans as of September 30, 2010, September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, and net charge-offs information for the quarter and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing commercial loans |
|
$ |
514,628 |
|
|
$ |
516,184 |
|
|
$ |
506,772 |
|
|
$ |
514,628 |
|
|
$ |
506,772 |
|
Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans
HIP, both excluding covered loans |
|
|
7.58 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
6.87 |
% |
|
|
7.58 |
% |
|
|
6.87 |
% |
Commercial loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
57,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
121,785 |
|
|
$ |
81,651 |
|
Commercial loan net charge-offs (annualized) to
average commercial loans HIP, excluding covered loans |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.40 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
1.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing commercial loans |
|
$ |
269,676 |
|
|
$ |
320,477 |
|
|
$ |
269,255 |
|
|
$ |
269,676 |
|
|
$ |
269,255 |
|
Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
4.73 |
% |
Commercial loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
43,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,615 |
|
|
$ |
128,765 |
|
|
$ |
88,678 |
|
Commercial loan net charge-offs (annualized) to
average commercial loans HIP |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
There were 2 commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with
an outstanding debt of approximately $23 million as of September 30, 2010, compared with 5
commercial loan relationships with an outstanding debt of approximately $100 million as of December
31, 2009, and 5 commercial loan relationships with an outstanding debt of $100 million as of
September 30, 2009.
131
The Corporations commercial loan net charge-offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
increased when compared with the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Due to the recessionary
environment that has resulted in lower absorption rates and pressure in real estate values, the
commercial loan portfolio in Puerto Rico continues to reflect high delinquencies and reductions in
the value of the underlying collateral. The commercial loan net charge-offs at the BPNA reportable
segment also reported an increase mostly related to commercial real
estate.
Notwithstanding, the commercial loans portfolio in the U.S. mainland reflected a reduction of
approximately $51 million in non-performing loans from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
The allowance for loan losses corresponding to commercial loans held-in-portfolio represented 4.37%
of that portfolio, excluding covered loans, as of September 30, 2010, compared with 3.46% as of
December 31, 2009. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans in the commercial loan category
was 65.33% as of September 30, 2010, compared with 52.31% as of December 31, 2009.
The Corporations commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (CRE), excluding construction
and covered loans, amounted to $7.1 billion as of September 30,
2010, of which $3.2 billion was
secured with owner occupied properties, compared with $7.5 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively,
as of December 31, 2009. CRE non-performing loans amounted to
$575 million or 8.14% of CRE loans as
of September 30, 2010, compared to $557 million or 7.41%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009.
The CRE non-performing loans ratios for the Corporations Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland operations
were 10.10% and 5.87%, respectively, as of September 30, 2010, compared with 8.29% and 6.39%,
respectively, as of December 31, 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations commercial loan portfolio, excluding covered loans,
included a total of $200 million of loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $4
million for the BPNA reportable segment, which were considered TDRs since they involved granting a
concession to borrowers under financial difficulties. The outstanding commitments for these
commercial loan TDRs amounted to $4 million in the BPPR reportable segment and no commitments
outstanding in the BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2010.
The commercial loan TDRs in non-performing status for the BPPR and
BPNA reportable segments as of September 30, 2010 amounted to $49
million and $4 million, respectively.
The commercial loan TDRs were
evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific reserve of $32.9 million for the BPPR reportable
segment and $1.0 million for the BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2010.
Construction loans
As shown in Table K, non-performing construction loans decreased by $36.8 million from December 31,
2009 to September 30, 2010, resulting from a decrease in the BPNA reportable segment offset by an
increase in the BPPR reportable segment. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to
construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased from 49.58% as of December
31, 2009 to 62.94% as of September 30, 2010, after considering a reduction of $424 million in
construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans. The ratio of non-performing
construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio was 40.86% as of September 30, 2009.
There were 18 construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status
with an outstanding balance of $489 million as of September 30, 2010, mostly related to the Puerto
Rico operations, compared with 22 construction loan relationships with an outstanding balance of
$544 million as of December 31, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, there were 21 construction loan
relationships with an outstanding balance of $524 million in non-performing status. The
construction loans in non-performing status for both reportable segments are primarily residential
real estate construction loans which have been adversely impacted by general market conditions,
decreases in property values, oversupply in certain areas and reduced absorption rates.
Construction loans net charge-offs for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared with the same
quarter in the previous year, decreased in both reportable segments. These declines were primarily
related to particular construction borrowers for which charge-offs were recorded during the third
quarter of 2009. Construction loan net charge-offs recorded during the third quarter of 2010 were
mainly related to loans with specific reserves established in previous quarters. The construction
loan portfolio is currently considered one of the higher-risk portfolios of the Corporation as it
continues to be adversely impacted by depressed economic and real estate market conditions,
particularly in Puerto Rico.
132
Management has identified construction loans considered impaired and has established specific
reserves based on the value of the collateral. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to
construction loans, excluding covered loans, represented 23.66% of that portfolio, excluding
covered loans, as of September 30, 2010, compared with 19.79% as of December 31, 2009. The ratio of
allowance to non-performing loans in the construction loans category was 37.59% as of September 30,
2010, compared with 39.92% as of December 31, 2009.
The BPPR reportable segments construction loan portfolio, excluding covered loans, totaled $884
million as of September 30, 2010, compared with $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $1.2
billion as of September 30, 2009.
The significant increase in the ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered
loans, was influenced by the reduction in the construction loan portfolio balance.
The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction
loan portfolio for the BPPR reportable segment totaled $236 million or 26.74% of construction loans
held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, as of September 30, 2010 compared to $215 million or
19.86%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The table that follows provides information on
construction non-performing loans as of September 30, 2010, September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2009, and net charge-offs information for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
September 30, 2009 for the BPPR reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans |
|
$ |
618,879 |
|
|
$ |
604,610 |
|
|
$ |
581,338 |
|
|
$ |
618,879 |
|
|
$ |
581,338 |
|
Non-performing construction
loans to construction loans HIP,
excluding covered loans |
|
|
70.03 |
% |
|
|
55.86 |
% |
|
|
48.49 |
% |
|
|
70.03 |
% |
|
|
48.49 |
% |
Construction loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
54,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,216 |
|
|
$ |
112,701 |
|
|
$ |
136,103 |
|
Construction loans net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average construction loans HIP,
excluding covered loans |
|
|
23.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.26 |
% |
|
|
15.10 |
% |
|
|
13.34 |
% |
|
The BPNA reportable segment construction loan portfolio totaled $416 million as of September
30, 2010, compared with $642 million as of December 31, 2009 and $683 million as of September 30,
2009. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPNA
reportable segment totaled $71 million or 17.13% of construction loans held-in-portfolio as of
September 30, 2010 compared to $126 million or 19.67%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The
table that follows provides the credit quality information for the BPNA reportable segments
construction loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans |
|
$ |
199,307 |
|
|
$ |
250,327 |
|
|
$ |
187,649 |
|
|
$ |
199,307 |
|
|
$ |
187,649 |
|
Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP |
|
|
47.88 |
% |
|
|
38.99 |
% |
|
|
27.47 |
% |
|
|
47.88 |
% |
|
|
27.47 |
% |
Construction loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
15,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,724 |
|
|
$ |
62,739 |
|
|
$ |
81,180 |
|
Construction loan net charge-offs (annualized) to average
construction loans HIP |
|
|
13.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.98 |
% |
|
|
15.32 |
% |
|
|
14.73 |
% |
|
The construction loan portfolio, excluding covered loans, included a total of $248 million
worth of loan modifications for the BPPR reportable segment and $95 million for the BPNA reportable
segment, which were considered TDRs as of September 30, 2010. The outstanding commitments for
these construction loan TDRs as of September 30, 2010 amounted to $80 million for the BPPR
reportable segment and $2 million for the BPNA reportable segment.
The construction loan TDRs in non-performing status for the BPPR and BPNA reportable segments as of September 30, 2010 amounted to $248 million and $95 million, respectively.
These construction loan TDRs
were individually evaluated for impairment resulting in a reserve of $38 million for the BPPR
reportable segment and $16 million for the BPNA reportable segment as of September 30, 2010.
In the current stressed housing market, the value of the collateral securing the loan has become
the most important factor in determining the amount of loss incurred and the appropriate level of
the allowance for loan losses. The likelihood of losses that are equal to the entire recorded
investment for a real estate loan is remote. However, in some cases during recent quarters
declining real estate values have resulted in the determination that the estimated value of the
collateral was insufficient to cover all of the recorded investment in the loans.
133
Mortgage loans
Non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased $158 million from December 31, 2009 to
September 30, 2010, associated with the BPPR reportable segment, partially offset by a reduction in
the BPNA reportable segment. Non-performing mortgage loans increased by $185 million from
September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
The decrease in the ratio of mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage loans
held-in-portfolio for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared with the same quarter in the
previous year, which is shown in Table M, was mainly due to lower losses in the U.S. mainland
non-conventional mortgage business. The BPPR reportable segment reported an increase in
delinquencies when compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The underwriting criteria and
high reinstatement experience associated with the mortgage loans in Puerto Rico have helped to
maintain losses at manageable levels. However, the mortgage business has continued to be
negatively impacted by the depressed economic conditions in Puerto Rico as evidenced by the
increased levels of non-performing loans.
The BPPR reportable segments mortgage loan portfolio totaled $3.4 billion as of September 30,
2010, compared with $3.1 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $3.0 billion as of September 30, 2009.
The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio for the BPPR reportable
segment totaled $38 million or 1.11% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans,
as of September 30, 2010 compared to $25 million or 0.79%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the mortgage loan TDRs for the BPPRs reportable segment amounted to $148 million,
of which $95 million were in non-performing status.
Although the criteria for specific impairment
excludes large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively
evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage loans), it specifically
requires its application to modifications considered
TDRs. These mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment
resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $3 million as of September 30, 2010.
The table that follows provides information on mortgage non-performing loans as of September 30,
2010, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, and net charge-offs information for the quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 for the BPPR reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing mortgage loans |
|
$ |
480,614 |
|
|
$ |
311,918 |
|
|
$ |
295,640 |
|
|
$ |
480,614 |
|
|
$ |
295,640 |
|
Non-performing mortgage
loans to mortgage loans HIP,
excluding covered loans |
|
|
13.98 |
% |
|
|
9.95 |
% |
|
|
9.79 |
% |
|
|
13.98 |
% |
|
|
9.79 |
% |
Mortgage loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
5,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,030 |
|
|
$ |
14,543 |
|
|
$ |
8,017 |
|
Mortgage loans net
charge-offs (annualized) to
average mortgage loans HIP,
excluding covered loans |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
The BPNA reportable segment mortgage loan portfolio totaled $1.3 billion as of September 30,
2010, compared with $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009. As compared to the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, this portfolio has reflected more stable levels
of non-performing loans and better performance in terms of losses.
However, the volume of loan
modifications and loans in the process of foreclosure continue to reflect the difficult economic
conditions and languishing real estate values in the U.S. mainland.
The following table presents the credit quality indicators for the BPNA reportable segments
mortgage loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing mortgage loans |
|
$ |
187,496 |
|
|
$ |
197,748 |
|
|
$ |
187,398 |
|
|
$ |
187,496 |
|
|
$ |
187,398 |
|
Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP |
|
|
14.32 |
% |
|
|
13.49 |
% |
|
|
12.28 |
% |
|
|
14.32 |
% |
|
|
12.28 |
% |
Mortgage loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
17,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,291 |
|
|
$ |
61,471 |
|
|
$ |
82,086 |
|
Mortgage loan net charge-offs (annualized) to
average mortgage loans HIP |
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.51 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
134
BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio outstanding as of September 30, 2010 amounted
to approximately $936.2 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $127 million, which
represents 13.55% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $1.1 billion with a related
allowance for loan losses of $118 million or 11.16%, respectively, as of December 31, 2009. The
Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA. Net charge-offs for
BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio totaled $14.4 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, resulting in a ratio of 6.02% of annualized net charge-offs to average
non-conventional mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
compared with $26.1 million and 9.30%, respectively, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio reported, on a cumulative basis, a total of $205
million worth of loan modifications considered TDRs as of September 30, 2010, compared with $187
million as of December 31, 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, BPNAs non-conventional mortgage loan
TDRs in non-performing status amounted to $71 million.
These
mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses
of $59 million as of September 30, 2010, compared with a specific allowance for loan losses of $52
million as of December 31, 2009 for the BPNA reportable segment.
Consumer loans
Non-performing consumer loans remained relatively stable from December 31, 2009 to September 30,
2010, primarily as a result of a decrease of $3.2 million in the BPNA reportable segment, partially
offset by an increase of $4.9 million in the BPPR reportable segment. The decrease in the BPNA
reportable segment was primarily associated with home equity lines of credit and closed-end second
mortgages, which are categorized by the Corporation as consumer loans. These portfolios have
experienced improvements in delinquency levels, specifically as compared to 2009.
Non-performing consumer loans, excluding covered loans, decreased by $10 million from September 30,
2009 to September 30, 2010. This variance was the result of a decrease of $17 million in the BPNA
reportable segment offset by an increase of $7 million in the BPPR reportable segment. The decrease
in the BPNA reportable segment was mainly attributed to the improved performance in E-LOANs
consumer loan portfolios. The increase in non-performing loans from September 30, 2009 to September
30, 2010 for the BPPR reportable segment was principally in auto loans due to current economic
conditions.
Consumer loans net charge-offs as a percentage of average consumer loans held-in-portfolio
decreased mostly due to lower delinquencies in certain portfolios in the U.S. mainland and in
Puerto Rico. The decrease in the ratio of consumer loans net charge-offs to average consumer loans
held-in-portfolio in the BPPR reportable segment was mainly attributed to personal loans and credit
cards.
The table that follows provides information on consumer non-performing loans as of September 30,
2010, September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, and net charge-offs information for the quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 for the BPPR reportable segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
BPPR Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing consumer loans |
|
$ |
41,604 |
|
|
$ |
36,695 |
|
|
$ |
34,571 |
|
|
$ |
41,604 |
|
|
$ |
34,571 |
|
Non-performing consumer loans
to consumer loans HIP,
excluding covered loans |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
1.09 |
% |
Consumer loans net charge-offs |
|
$ |
34,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,865 |
|
|
$ |
100,026 |
|
|
$ |
130,998 |
|
Consumer loan net charge-offs
(annualized) to average
consumer loans HIP, excluding
covered loans |
|
|
4.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
5.33 |
% |
|
135
The following table presents the credit quality indicators for the BPNA reportable segments
consumer loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
September |
|
December |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
30, 2010 |
|
31, 2009 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2010 |
|
30 2009 |
|
BPNA Reportable Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing consumer loans |
|
$ |
24,302 |
|
|
$ |
27,490 |
|
|
$ |
41,421 |
|
|
$ |
24,302 |
|
|
$ |
41,421 |
|
Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
4.01 |
% |
Consumer loan net charge-offs |
|
$ |
18,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,726 |
|
|
$ |
63,647 |
|
|
$ |
106,718 |
|
Consumer loan net charge-offs (annualized) to
average consumer loans HIP |
|
|
8.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.59 |
% |
|
|
9.38 |
% |
|
|
12.44 |
% |
|
As previously explained, the decrease in non-performing consumer loans for the BPNA reportable
segment was attributed in part to E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and closed-end second
mortgages. As of September 30, 2010, approximately $16 million or 3.55% of E-LOANs home equity
lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages were in non-performing status, compared with $16
million or 2.89% as of December 31, 2009, and $29 million or 5.02%, respectively, as of September
30, 2009. As compared to 2009, these loan portfolios showed signs of improved performance due to
significant charge-offs recorded in previous quarters improving the quality of the remaining
portfolio, combined with aggressive collection efforts and loan modification programs. Combined net
charge-offs for E-LOANs home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages amounted to
approximately $12.9 million or 10.88% of those particular average loan portfolios for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010, compared with $25.0 million or 16.53%, respectively, for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this subsidiary ceased originating these
types of loans. Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines of credit. This type
of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrowers residence, allows
customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate market values as of the time the
loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in addition, changes in
these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOANs portfolio of home equity lines of credit and
closed-end second mortgages outstanding as of September 30, 2010 totaled $461 million with a
related allowance for loan losses of $66 million, representing 14.35% of that particular portfolio.
E-LOANs portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 totaled $539 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $95 million,
representing 17.59% of that particular portfolio.
Other real estate
Other real estate represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure.
Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC increased by $43 million
from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010, and included commercial and residential properties.
With the slowdown in the real estate market caused primarily by persistent weak economic conditions
in certain geographical areas, there has been a softening effect on the market for resale of
repossessed real estate properties. Defaulted loans have increased, and these loans move through
the foreclosure process to the other real estate classification. The combination of increased flow
of defaulted loans from the loan portfolio to other real estate owned and the slowing of the
liquidation market has resulted in an increase in the number of other real estate units on hand.
The increase was partially offset by write-downs recorded in the fair value of the properties based
on re-appraisals.
Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC amounted to $78 million as of
September 30, 2010 and is disclosed in a separate line item in the statement of condition in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. As part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction, the Corporation acquired that portfolio of other real estate properties, which were
recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell at the April 30, 2010 transaction date.
136
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more disclosed in Table K consist primarily of credit cards, FHA
/ VA and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporations
financial statements pursuant to GNMAs buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA
mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the
option to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past
due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other financial
institutions that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the
sellers / servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements.
However, residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions, which are in
the process of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Refer to the 2009 Annual Report for a detailed description of the Corporations accounting
policy for determining the allowance for loan losses and for the Corporations definition of
impaired loans.
As indicated previously in this MD&A, the covered loans were recognized at fair value as of the
April 30, 2010 acquisition date, which included the impact of expected credit losses and therefore,
no allowance for credit losses was recorded as of such date. To the extent credit deterioration
occurs after the date of acquisition, the Corporation would record an allowance for loan losses.
Also, the Corporation would record an increase in the FDIC loss share indemnification asset for the
expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. Management determined that
there was no need to record an allowance for loan losses on the covered loans as of September 30,
2010.
Tables N to P set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporations allowance for
loan losses (ALLL) as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and September 30, 2009 by loan
category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant
to the requirements for specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance.
TABLE N
Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses as of September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
107,318 |
|
|
$ |
182,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
351,491 |
|
Impaired loans [1] |
|
|
621,557 |
|
|
|
794,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726,113 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired loans |
|
|
17.27 |
% |
|
|
22.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.36 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
405,053 |
|
|
$ |
125,454 |
|
|
$ |
14,302 |
|
|
$ |
112,641 |
|
|
$ |
235,053 |
|
|
$ |
892,503 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans [1] |
|
|
11,097,570 |
|
|
|
505,213 |
|
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
4,440,228 |
|
|
|
3,759,798 |
|
|
|
20,416,369 |
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio, excluding
impaired loans |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
24.83 |
% |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
512,371 |
|
|
$ |
307,588 |
|
|
$ |
14,302 |
|
|
$ |
174,680 |
|
|
$ |
235,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,243,994 |
|
Total loans held-in-portfolio [1] |
|
|
11,719,127 |
|
|
|
1,299,929 |
|
|
|
613,560 |
|
|
|
4,750,068 |
|
|
|
3,759,798 |
|
|
|
22,142,482 |
|
ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
23.66 |
% |
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Excludes covered loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction. Covered loans did not require an allowance for loan
losses as of September 30, 2010. |
137
TABLE O
Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
108,769 |
|
|
$ |
162,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
323,887 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
645,513 |
|
|
$ |
841,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
186,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,673,621 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired
loans |
|
|
16.85 |
% |
|
|
19.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.35 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
328,940 |
|
|
$ |
178,412 |
|
|
$ |
18,558 |
|
|
$ |
102,400 |
|
|
$ |
309,007 |
|
|
$ |
937,317 |
|
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
$ |
12,018,546 |
|
|
$ |
883,012 |
|
|
$ |
675,629 |
|
|
$ |
4,416,498 |
|
|
$ |
4,045,807 |
|
|
$ |
22,039,492 |
|
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
20.20 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
437,709 |
|
|
$ |
341,319 |
|
|
$ |
18,558 |
|
|
$ |
154,611 |
|
|
$ |
309,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,204 |
|
Total loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
$ |
12,664,059 |
|
|
$ |
1,724,373 |
|
|
$ |
675,629 |
|
|
$ |
4,603,245 |
|
|
$ |
4,045,807 |
|
|
$ |
23,713,113 |
|
ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
19.79 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
5.32 |
% |
|
TABLE P
Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
Construction |
|
Lease Financing |
|
Mortgage |
|
Consumer |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL |
|
$ |
106,701 |
|
|
$ |
171,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
313,224 |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
619,544 |
|
|
$ |
751,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,539,383 |
|
Specific ALLL to impaired
loans |
|
|
17.22 |
% |
|
|
22.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.35 |
% |
|
General ALLL |
|
$ |
266,563 |
|
|
$ |
168,309 |
|
|
$ |
24,609 |
|
|
$ |
108,848 |
|
|
$ |
325,848 |
|
|
$ |
894,177 |
|
Loans held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
$ |
12,456,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,130,093 |
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,379,509 |
|
|
$ |
4,191,410 |
|
|
$ |
22,856,686 |
|
General ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio,
excluding impaired loans |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
14.89 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
Total ALLL |
|
$ |
373,264 |
|
|
$ |
339,340 |
|
|
$ |
24,609 |
|
|
$ |
144,340 |
|
|
$ |
325,848 |
|
|
$ |
1,207,401 |
|
Total loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
$ |
13,075,868 |
|
|
$ |
1,882,069 |
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,547,372 |
|
|
$ |
4,191,410 |
|
|
$ |
24,396,069 |
|
ALLL to loans
held-in-portfolio |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
18.03 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
7.77 |
% |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
As compared to December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses decreased by approximately $17
million. This decrease is the net result of a decrease in the BPNA reportable segment by $75
million offset by an increase of $58 million in the BPPR reportable segment. The increase in the
allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan portfolio as of September 30, 2010 was mainly
attributed to BPPRs commercial real estate portfolio considering this market has been negatively
impacted by the current economic situation in Puerto Rico. The construction loan portfolio
continues to maintain the highest allowance coverage mainly due to the continued deterioration of
economic and housing market conditions in Puerto Rico. The increase in the allowance for loan
losses for mortgage loans from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 was primarily related to the
BPPR reportable segment influenced by the increasing level of delinquent mortgages and increasing
loan modifications. The reduction in the allowance for loan
losses for the consumer loan portfolio continues to be driven by more stable performance trends
138
in
certain portfolios in terms of non-performing loans and losses combined with portfolio reductions
in the Puerto Rico and U.S. mainland operations.
The Corporations recorded investment in commercial, construction and mortgage loans that were
considered impaired and the related valuation allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
|
Recorded |
|
Valuation |
(In millions) |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Investment |
|
Allowance |
|
Impaired loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance required |
|
$ |
1,246.7 |
|
|
$ |
351.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,263.3 |
|
|
$ |
323.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,134.5 |
|
|
$ |
313.2 |
|
No valuation allowance required |
|
|
479.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,726.1 |
|
|
$ |
351.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,673.6 |
|
|
$ |
323.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,539.4 |
|
|
$ |
313.2 |
|
|
With respect to the $479 million portfolio of impaired commercial and construction loans for
which no allowance for loan losses was required as of September 30, 2010, management followed the
guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the
impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired
loan discounted at the loans original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of
the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A
loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the
underlying collateral. The $479 million impaired commercial and construction loans with no
valuation allowance were collateral dependent loans in which management performed a detailed
analysis based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell and determined that
the collateral was deemed adequate to cover any losses as of September 30, 2010.
Average impaired loans during the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $1.7 billion and
$1.5 billion, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on impaired loans of $5.2
million and $5.1 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and
$14.5 million and $12.0 million, respectively, for the year-to-date periods ended September 30,
2010 and September 30, 2009.
The following tables set forth an analysis of the activity in the specific reserves for impaired
loans, excluding covered loans, for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010 |
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Loans |
|
Construction Loans |
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL as of July 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
132,753 |
|
|
$ |
188,949 |
|
|
$ |
61,737 |
|
|
$ |
383,439 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
28,942 |
|
|
|
67,595 |
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
|
|
101,846 |
|
Less: Charge-offs |
|
|
54,377 |
|
|
|
74,410 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
133,794 |
|
|
Specific ALLL as of September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
107,318 |
|
|
$ |
182,134 |
|
|
$ |
62,039 |
|
|
$ |
351,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 |
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial Loans |
|
Construction Loans |
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
Total |
|
Specific ALLL as of July 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
197,898 |
|
|
$ |
85,608 |
|
|
$ |
29,584 |
|
|
$ |
313,090 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
59,814 |
|
|
|
41,004 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
108,561 |
|
Less: Charge-offs |
|
|
86,681 |
|
|
|
19,911 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
108,427 |
|
|
Specific ALLL as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
171,031 |
|
|
$ |
106,701 |
|
|
$ |
35,492 |
|
|
$ |
313,224 |
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, total charge-offs for individually evaluated
impaired loans amounted to approximately $133.8 million, of which $89.0 million pertained to the
BPPR reportable segment and $44.8 million to the BPNA reportable segment. Most of these
charge-offs were related to the commercial and construction portfolios. As compared to the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, the increase in charge-offs for construction loans considered impaired
was mainly associated to particular borrowers in the BPPR reportable segment. The specific
reserves for these borrowers were established in prior quarters.
139
Given the challenging economic environment in Puerto Rico, the Corporations credit metrics
for its Puerto Rico operations will remain under pressure in 2010, particularly real estate related
assets. The U.S. operations have followed the general credit trends on the mainland demonstrating
progressive improvement; nonetheless, credit quality continues to be closely monitored.
Other commitments to extend credit
Commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit amounted to $19 million and $116
million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010; $13 million and $134 million, respectively, as of
December 31, 2009; and $18 million and $162 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2009. In
addition, the Corporation has commitments to originate mortgage loans amounting to $64 million as
of September 30, 2010, $48 million as of December 31, 2009 and $55 million as of September 30,
2009.
Commitments to extend credit, which include credit card lines, commercial lines of credit, and
other unused credit commitments, amounted to $6.2 billion as of September 30, 2010, excluding the commitments to extend
credit that pertain to the Westernbank acquired lending relationships, and $7.0 billion as
of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $8 million for
potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines
of credit unrelated to the acquired lending relationships from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted
transaction, compared to $15 million as of December 31, 2009. The estimated reserve is principally
based on the expected draws on these facilities using historical trends and the application of the
corresponding reserve factors determined under the Corporations allowance for loan losses
methodology. The decrease in the reserve for unfunded commitments from December 31, 2009 to
September 30, 2010 was primarily related to decreasing trends in funding rates in BPPRs and BPNAs
commercial portfolios, and E-LOANs home equity lines of credit. This reserve for unfunded
exposures remains separate and distinct from the allowance for loan losses and is reported as part
of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
As of September 30, 2010, the commitments to extend credit related to the Westernbank acquired
lending relationships approximated $176 million. The acquired commitments to extend credit are
covered under the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, subject to FDIC approvals, limitations on
the timing for such disbursements, and servicing guidelines, among various considerations. As
indicated in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on the April 30, 2010 acquisition
date, the Corporation recorded a contingent liability for such commitments at fair value. As of
September 30, 2010, that contingent liability amounted to $120 million and is recorded as part of
other liabilities in the consolidated statement of condition.
Geographical and government risk
As explained in the 2009 Annual Report, the Corporation is exposed to geographical and government
risk. The Corporations assets and revenue composition by geographical area and by business
segment reporting are presented in Note 29 to the consolidated financial statements.
A significant portion of the Corporations financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated
in Puerto Rico. Since 2006, the Puerto Rico economy has been experiencing recessionary conditions.
Based on information published by the Puerto Rico Planning Board (the Planning Board), the Puerto
Rico real gross national product decreased an estimated 3.6% during fiscal year 2010. The
unemployment rate in Puerto Rico has remained high at 16%, as of August 2010. The Puerto Rico
economy continues to be challenged, primarily, by a housing sector that remains under pressure,
contraction in the manufacturing sector and a fiscal deficit that constrains government spending.
The government recently enacted a housing-incentive law that puts into effect temporary measures,
effective from September 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011, that seek to stimulate demand for housing
and reduce the significant
140
excess supply of new homes. The incentives include reductions in taxes and government closing fees,
tax exemption on rental income from new properties for 10 years, exemption on long-term capital
gain tax in future sale of new properties and no property taxes for five years on new housing,
among others.
Several major projects are under consideration by the Puerto Rico Government in areas such as
energy and road infrastructure. These are to be structured as public and private partnerships and
are expected to generate economic activity as they are awarded and construction commences. There
are also various hotel projects under development. Another positive development is the remaining
disbursements under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), of which $3.2
billion or close to 48% had been disbursed as of June 30, 2010. The Puerto Rican economy is still
vulnerable, but the government has made progress in addressing the budget deficit while the banking
sector has been substantially recapitalized and consolidated through FDIC-assisted transactions.
The current state of the economy and uncertainty in the private and public sectors has resulted in,
among other things, a downturn in the Corporations loan originations; deterioration in the credit
quality of the Corporations loan portfolios as reflected in high levels of non-performing assets,
loan loss provisions and charge-offs, particularly in the Corporations construction and commercial
loan portfolios; an increase in the rate of foreclosures on mortgage loans; and a reduction in the
value of the Corporations loans and loan servicing portfolio, all of which have adversely affected
its profitability. The persistent economic slowdown would cause those adverse effects to continue,
as delinquency rates may increase in the short-term, until sustainable growth resumes. Also, a
potential reduction in consumer spending may also impact growth in the Corporations other interest
and non-interest revenues.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation had $1.2 billion of credit facilities granted to or
guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions, of which $215 million were
uncommitted lines of credit. Of these total credit facilities granted, $1 billion were outstanding
as of September 30, 2010. A substantial portion of the Corporations credit exposure to the
Government of Puerto Rico is either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source
of income or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of senior
and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services
or products, such as water and electric power utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees
of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from
it. The Corporation also has loans to various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which the good
faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their
repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts
as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. Another
portion of these loans consists of special obligations of various municipalities that are payable
from the basic real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities.
Furthermore, as of September 30, 2010, the Corporation had outstanding $238 million in obligations
of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions as part of its investment securities portfolio.
Refer to Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. Of
that total, $234 million was exposed to the creditworthiness of the Puerto Rico Government and its
municipalities.
As further detailed in Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial
portion of the Corporations investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in
the form of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well
as mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by GNMA. In addition, $523 million of residential
mortgages and $292 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or
its agencies as of September 30, 2010.
141
REGULATORY RISK
The Corporation is subject to regulations imposed by the U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Assets
Control, or OFAC. OFAC regulations impose restrictions on financial transactions by persons
subject to those regulations with or involving targeted countries and persons, including Cuba,
Burma/Myanmar, Iran and Sudan and persons and entities identified on OFACs list of Specially
Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, or the SDN List. The Corporation has no business
operations, subsidiaries or affiliated entities in the countries targeted by the OFAC regulations
and it has procedures in place designed to identify transactions involving targeted countries and
persons or entities on the SDN List.
See additional information on Item 1A. Risk Factors included in this Form 10-Q.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not
recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are
different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. As a provider of financial
services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the
financial needs of its customers which may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit.
These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance
sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest
rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. Other types of
off-balance sheet arrangements that the Corporation enters in the ordinary course of business
include derivatives, operating leases and provision of guarantees, indemnifications, and
representation and warranties.
The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial
commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal
course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to
future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding
agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum
quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined
as purchase obligations.
There were no significant changes in other contractual obligations, such as purchase obligations,
capital leases, and operating leases, or pension and postretirement liabilities, and uncertain tax
positions as of September 30, 2010, when compared with December 31, 2009. Refer to Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements for information on commitments and guarantees.
As previously indicated, the Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is
required either to receive or pay cash, depending on fluctuations in interest rates. These
contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated statements of condition with the fair value
representing the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on
market rates of interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract
changes daily as interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional
collateral on margin calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions. The Corporations
derivative activities have not changed significantly from December 31, 2009.
Under the Corporations repurchase agreements, Popular is required to deposit cash or qualifying
securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously
pledged as collateral declines as a result of changes in interest rates, the Corporation will be
required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby
adversely affecting its liquidity.
The Corporation also utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of
business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporations exposure to credit
losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is
represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit
procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in
extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon,
the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporations actual future credit
exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments.
142
Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for a discussion on
contractual amounts as they relate to commitments to extend credit.
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR has agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the true up
measurement date of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered
assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to
reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true up payment is recorded as a reduction
in the fair value of the FDIC loss share indemnification asset.
The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that the final disposition of
these matters (except for the matters described in the Legal Proceedings section in Note 19 to the
consolidated financial statements which are in very early stages and as to which the outcome cannot
be predicted) will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Guarantees associated with loans sold / serviced
The Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to
limited, and in certain instances, lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral
for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may have sold, in bulk
sale transactions, residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse or to certain
representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and
warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral,
prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans
under the credit recourse agreements or breach of representations and warranties.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation serviced $4.1 billion in residential mortgage loans
subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac
programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the
Corporation may be required to repurchase the loan or reimburse for the incurred loss. The maximum
potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the
recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total
outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if
applicable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation repurchased
approximately $93 million in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions. In the event
of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing
the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a
foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding
principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and
disposing of the related property. Most claims associated with the residential mortgage loans
subject to credit recourse provisions are settled by repurchases of delinquent loans. As of
September 30, 2010, the Corporations liability established to cover the estimated credit loss
exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $38 million (December
31, 2009 $16 million; September 30, 2009 $16 million). Refer to Note 19 to the consolidated
financial statements for a description of the methodology followed to determine the recourse
liability.
When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary
representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporations
mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged
for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or may
sell the loans directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. To the extent the loans do not
meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or
indemnify for losses. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures
are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. The
Corporation has not recorded any specific contingent liability in the consolidated financial
statements for these customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by the
Corporations mortgage operations in Puerto Rico, and management believes that, based on historical
data, the probability of payments and expected losses under these representations and warranty
arrangements is not significant.
143
Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to
mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the
Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and
insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporation serviced $18.0 billion in mortgage loans, including the loans serviced with credit
recourse. The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the
mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds from mortgage loans foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA
loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantee programs. However, in the meantime,
the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is
outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and
defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be
canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future
servicing income with respect to that loan. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance of
funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately
$25 million. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporations servicing portfolio
experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash
resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative
costs related to increases in collection efforts.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation established reserves for customary representations and
warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN. Loans had been sold to investors on
a servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of
loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation is required to make certain
representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if
not complied, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify
investors for any related losses associated to these loans. The loans had been sold prior to 2009.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations reserve for estimated losses from such representation
and warranty arrangements amounted to $35 million, which was included as part of other liabilities
in the consolidated statement of condition. E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans,
since the subsidiary ceased these activities during 2008. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation
reassesses its estimate for expected losses associated to E-LOANs customary representation and
warranty arrangements. The analysis incorporates expectations on future disbursements based on
quarterly repurchases and make-whole events. The analysis also considers factors such as the
average length-time between the loans funding date and the loan repurchase date as observed in the
historical loan data. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, E-LOAN charged-off
approximately $8.8 million against this representation and warranty reserve associated with loan
repurchases and indemnification or make-whole events (nine months ended September 30, 2009 $13.2
million). Make-whole events are typically defaulted loans in which the investor attempts to recover
through the collateral or guarantees, and the seller is obligated to cover any impaired or
unrecovered portion of the loan. Claims have been predominantly for first mortgage agency loans and
principally consist of underwriting errors related to undisclosed debt or missing documentation.
During 2008, the Corporation provided indemnifications for the breach of certain representations or
warranties in connection with various sales of assets by the discontinued operations of PFH. These
sales were on a non-credit recourse basis. The agreements primarily include indemnification for
breaches of certain key representations and warranties, some of which expire within a definite time
period; others survive until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, and others do
not expire. Certain of the indemnifications are subject to a cap or maximum aggregate liability
defined as a percentage of the purchase price. The indemnifications agreements outstanding as of
September 30, 2010 are related principally to make-whole arrangements. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporations reserve related to PFHs indemnity arrangements amounted to $4 million (December
31, 2009 $9 million; September 30, 2009 $19 million). During the nine months ended September
30, 2010, the Corporation recorded charge-offs with respect to the PFHs representation and
warranty arrangements amounting to approximately $2.3 million (nine months ended September 30, 2009
- $1.2 million). The reserve balance as of September 30, 2010 contemplates historical indemnity
payments. Certain indemnification provisions, which included, for example, reimbursement of
premiums on early loan payoffs and repurchase obligations for defaulted loans within a short-term
period, expired during 2009. Popular, Inc. Holding Company and Popular North America have agreed to
guarantee certain obligations of PFH with respect to the indemnification obligations.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
144
The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets,
available-for-sale securities, derivatives, mortgage servicing rights, and the equity appreciation
instrument. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a
nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are
collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically
result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual
assets.
The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level
hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation
methodology used for fair value measurement are observable. The hierarchy is broken down into three
levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. No significant
degree of judgment for these valuations is needed, as they are based on quoted prices that
are readily available in an active market. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either
directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or that can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial asset or liability.
Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about what market
participants would use to price the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk.
The inputs are developed based on the best available information, which might include the
Corporations own data such as internally-developed models and discounted cash flow
analyses. |
The Corporation requires the use of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use
of unobservable inputs to determine fair value. The amount of judgment involved in estimating the
fair value of a financial instrument depends upon the availability of quoted market prices or
observable market parameters. In addition, it may be affected on other factors such as the type of
instrument, the liquidity of the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs to the
valuation, as well as the contractual characteristics of the instrument.
If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs valuation models that
primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rate curves, volatilities,
credit curves, and discount, prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When
market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more
subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results
from diminished observability of both actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of
market liquidity for those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on
modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow models, the Corporation uses assumptions such as
interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. Valuation
adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instruments fair value is
adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace.
Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporations fair
value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. As of September 30,
2010, approximately $6.3 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
used market-based or market-derived valuation inputs in their valuation methodology and, therefore,
were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value are
classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored
entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed
securities (MBS) and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), and derivative instruments.
U.S. Treasury securities are valued based on yields that are interpolated from the constant
maturity treasury curve. Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities are priced based on an
active exchange market and on quoted prices for similar securities. Obligations of Puerto Rico,
States and political subdivisions are valued based on trades, bid price or spread, two sided
markets, quotes, benchmark curves, market data feeds, discount and capital rates and trustee
reports. MBS and CMOs are priced based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by
credit quality and market sector. Refer to the Derivatives section below for a description of the
valuation techniques used to value these instruments.
145
As of September 30, 2010, the remaining 3% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
were classified as Level 3 since their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable
inputs. The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed
securities and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). GNMA tax exempt mortgage-backed securities are
priced using a local demand price matrix prepared from local dealer quotes, and other local
investments such as corporate securities and local mutual funds which are priced by local dealers.
MSRs, on the other hand, are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model which considers
servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges,
other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Additionally, the Corporation
reported $651 million of financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
as of September 30, 2010, all of which were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.
Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the
market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants.
Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $47 million as of September
30, 2010, of which $38 million were Level 3 assets and $9 million were Level 2 assets. These assets
consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these
securities is based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative
local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing is non-binding local broker quotes
obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities are classified as Level 3.
During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, $113 million and $197 million,
respectively, of tax-exempt FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities were transferred out of Level
3 and into Level 2 as a result of a change in valuation methodology from an internally-developed
matrix pricing to pricing them based on a bonds theoretical value from similar bonds defined by
credit quality and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. Pursuant
to the Corporations policy, these transfers were recognized as of the end of the reporting period.
There were no transfers in and / or out of Level 1 during the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Refer to Note 21 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of
the Corporations valuation methodologies used for the assets and liabilities measured at fair
value as of September 30, 2010. Also, refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates in the
2009 Annual Report for additional information on the accounting guidance and the Corporations
policies or procedures related to fair value measurements.
Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities
available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing services and are validated with alternate
pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented
and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporations financial statements.
Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and
investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and
the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing
service providers or broker dealers.
Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the
relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the
pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument,
such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is
not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with
brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on
similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the evaluated instrument.
If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it
discontinues pricing the instrument. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
none of the Corporations investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the
pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service
providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance.
Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least
on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses
that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of
the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit
ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any
146
guarantees.
Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics
and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for
each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation
includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and
level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporations portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale amounted to $6.2 billion and represented 96% of the Corporations assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of September 30, 2010, net unrealized gains on the
trading and available-for-sale investment securities portfolios approximated $30 million and $225
million, respectively. Fair values for most of the Corporations trading and investment securities
available-for-sale are classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale
classified as Level 3, which are the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment,
represent less than 1% of the Corporations total portfolio of trading and investment securities
available-for-sale.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), which amounted to $166 million as of September 30, 2010, do not
trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon
discounted net cash flows calculated from a combination of loan level data and market assumptions.
The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows
(e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash
flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service,
escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations.
Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan
portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporations loan characteristics and portfolio
behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have been historically lower. Other assumptions are,
in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key
economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a
sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Derivatives
Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options, are traded in
over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate
benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on
present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and
have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or to be announced securities (TBAs). All of
these derivatives held by the Corporation are classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative
assets and liabilities reflect the values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance
risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporations own credit risk, is
determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the
collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation.
The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed models which incorporate the
creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral
received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of
default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation employs procedures for credit
approvals and credit limits, monitors the counterparties credit condition, enters into master
netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During
the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2010, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of
the derivatives resulted in a net loss of $0.8 million and $2.4 million, respectively, recorded in
the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of
operations, which consisted of a loss of $1.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, resulting
from the Corporations own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $0.4 million and a loss of $0.6
million, respectively, from the assessment of the counterparties credit risk.
Equity appreciation instrument
The fair value of the equity appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC was estimated by
determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The principal
variables in determining the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument include the implied
volatility determined based on the historical daily volatility of the Corporations common stock,
the exercise price of the instrument, the price of the call option, and the risk-free rate. The
equity appreciation instrument is classified as Level 2. The Corporation recognized
non-interest income of $10.6 million and $35.0 million, respectively, during the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of
147
a decrease in the fair value of the equity appreciation instrument. The carrying amount of the
equity appreciation instrument, which is recorded as other liability in the consolidated statement
of condition, amounted to $17.5 million as of September 30, 2010.
Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral
dependent
The impairment is based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that
take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar
locations, size and supply and demand. Continued deterioration of the housing markets and the
economy in general have adversely impacted and continue to affect the market activity related to
real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are
reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
MARKET RISK
The financial results and capital levels of Popular, Inc. are constantly exposed to market risk.
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to adverse movements in market rates or prices, which
include interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices; the failure to meet financial
obligations coming due because of the inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding; and
the inability to easily unwind or offset specific exposures without significantly lowering prices
because of inadequate market depth or market disruptions.
While the Corporation is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate
risk and liquidity are major risks that can materially impact future results of operations and
financial condition due to their complexity and dynamic nature.
The Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible
for planning and executing the Corporations market, interest rate risk, funding activities and
strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Corporations Risk
Management Committee. In addition, a Market Risk Manager, who is part of the Risk Management Group,
has been appointed to enhance and strengthen controls surrounding interest, liquidity, and market
risks, and independently monitor and report adherence with established market and liquidity
policies. The ALCO meets on a monthly basis and reviews various interest rate risk sensitivities,
ratios and portfolio information, including but not limited to, the Corporations liquidity
positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic
conditions.
Interest rate risk (IRR), a component of market risk, is considered by management as a
predominant market risk in terms of its potential impact on profitability or market value. The
techniques for measuring the potential impact of the Corporations exposure to market risk from
changing interest rates that were described in the 2009 Annual Report are the same as those applied
by the Corporation as of September 30, 2010.
Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a
tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting
from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation
model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or
costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its
composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and
maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process,
emphasizing future performance under diverse economic conditions.
Management assesses interest rate risk using various interest rate scenarios that differ in
magnitude and direction, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For
example, the types of interest rate scenarios processed include most likely economic scenarios,
flat or unchanged rates, yield curve twists, +/- 200 and + 400 basis points parallel ramps and +/-
200 basis points parallel shocks. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis
and prepayment risk exposures. The asset and liability management group also evaluates the
reasonableness of assumptions used and results obtained in the monthly sensitivity analyses. Due to
the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate
third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the
148
duration of the Corporations deposits and interest rate scenarios.
The Corporation runs net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the
yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios
considered in these market risk disclosures reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis
points during the twelve-month period ending September 30, 2011. Under a 200 basis points rising
rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $44.0 million, while under a 400 basis
points rising rate scenario, projected net interest income increases by $69.5 million, when
compared against the Corporations flat or unchanged interest rates forecast scenario. Given the
fact that as of September 30, 2010 some market interest rates continued to be close to zero,
management has focused on measuring the risk on net interest income in rising rate scenarios. These
interest rate simulations exclude the impact on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30,
whose yields are based on managements current expectation of future cash flows.
Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest
rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. They should not be relied upon as
indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management
could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking
computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.
The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity (EVE) to changes in
interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporations assets minus the
estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure
long-term IRR because it captures the impact of up or down rate changes in expected cash flows,
including principal and interest, from all future periods.
EVE sensitivity calculated using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis.
The shock scenarios consist of +/- 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management has defined limits
for the increases / decreases in EVE resulting from the shock scenarios. As of September 30, 2010,
the Corporation was in compliance with these limits.
The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the
use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income
or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives
is subject to interest rate fluctuations and counterparty credit risk adjustments which could have
a positive or negative effect in the Corporations earnings.
FDIC-assisted transaction
The Corporations total assets increased significantly from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010
because of the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Management believes
that the transaction will improve the Corporations net interest income, as it will generate more
interest earned on the acquired loans than it will pay in interest on deposits and borrowings
related to the acquisition with limited exceptions. The loans were initially recorded at estimated
fair values. The estimated fair values of acquired loans on the acquisition date reflect an
estimate of expected losses related to these assets. As a result, operating losses may be affected
if loan losses exceed the losses reflected in the fair value of these assets at the acquisition
date. In addition, to the extent that the stated interest rate on the acquired covered loans was
not considered a market rate of interest at the acquisition date, appropriate adjustments to the
acquisition-date fair value were recorded. These adjustments mitigate the risk associated with the
acquisition of loans earning a below-market rate of return. As expressed in previous sections of
this report, most of the covered loans will have an accretable yield. The accretable yield is the
amount by which the undiscounted expected cash flows exceed the estimated fair value. The
accretable yield includes the future interest expected to be collected over the remaining life of
the acquired loans and the purchase premium or discount. The remaining life includes the effects of
estimated prepayments, expected credit losses and adjustments to market liquidity and prevailing
interest rates at acquisition date. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the
Corporation is required to periodically evaluate its estimate of cash flows expected to be
collected. These evaluations, performed quarterly, will require the continued usage of key
assumptions and estimates, similar to the initial estimate of fair value. Given the current
economic environment, management must apply judgment to develop its estimates of cash flows for
those covered loans given the impact of home price and property value changes, changing loss
severities and prepayment speeds. Decreases in the expected cash flows will generally result in a
charge to the provision for credit losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan
losses. Increases in the
149
expected cash flows will generally result in an increase in interest income over the remaining life
of the loan, or pool of loans.
As indicated in the Westerbank FDIC-assisted transaction section in this MD&A, the equity
appreciation instrument issued to the FDIC is recognized at fair value and added $35.0 million to
non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The fair value of the equity
appreciation instrument is estimated by determining a call option value using the Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model, and the value depends largely on variations of the Corporations current
common stock price, its projected volatility and the remaining maturity of the instrument.
Foreign Exchange
The Corporation holds interests in Consorcio de Tarjetas Dominicanas, S.A. (CONTADO) and Centro
Financiero BHD, S.A. (BHD) in the Dominican Republic. Although not significant, some of these
businesses are conducted in the countrys foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency
translation adjustment, from operations for which the functional currency is other than the U.S.
dollar, is reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of
condition, except for highly-inflationary environments in which the effects would be included in
the consolidated statements of operations.
As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation had approximately $35 million in an unfavorable foreign
currency translation adjustment as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), compared to an
unfavorable adjustment of $41 million as of December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.
Popular, Inc. operates in Venezuela through its wholly-owned subsidiary EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A.
On January 7, 2010, Venezuelas National Consumer Price Index (NCPI) for December 2009 was
released. The cumulative three-year inflation rates for both of Venezuelas inflation indices were
over 100 percent. The Corporation began considering Venezuelas economy as highly inflationary as
of January 1, 2010, and the financial statements of EVERTEC Venezuela were remeasured as if the
functional currency was the reporting currency as of such date. ASC
Paragraph 830-10-45-11 defines a
highly inflationary economy as one with a cumulative inflation rate of approximately 100 percent or
more over a three-year period. Under ASC Topic 830, if a countrys economy is classified as highly
inflationary, the functional currency of the foreign entity operating in that country must be
remeasured to the functional currency of the reporting entity. The unfavorable impact of
remeasuring the financial statements of EVERTEC Venezuela as of September 30, 2010, was
approximately $1.8 million. Total assets for EVERTEC Venezuela remeasured approximated $8.0
million as of September 30, 2010.
LIQUIDITY
The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient
liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a
reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. An
institutions liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it
experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes
counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. An institution is also exposed to liquidity
risk if the markets on which it depends are subject to temporary disruptions.
The Corporation obtains liquidity from both sides of the balance sheet as well as from
off-balance-sheet activities. Liquid assets can be quickly and easily converted to cash at a
reasonable cost, or are timed to mature when management anticipates a need for additional
liquidity. The Corporations investment portfolio, including money markets such as fed funds sold
and loans that can be pledged at the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and the investment portfolio
currently not pledged to other counterparties in the repo market, are used to manage Populars
liquidity needs. The Corporations banking subsidiaries also had established collateralized
borrowing facilities at the Discount Window with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Fed) that
can be used under stress scenarios. On the liability side, diversified sources of deposits and
secured credit facilities provide liquidity to Populars operations. Even if some of these
alternatives may not be available temporarily, it is expected that in the normal course of
business, the Corporations funding sources are adequate.
Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook of its principal
markets and regulatory changes, could affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for
the possibility of such scenario,
150
management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing under stress scenarios when
important sources of funds that are usually fully available are temporarily unavailable. These
plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms such as the pledging of certain asset classes and
accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in place with the FHLB and the Fed. The
Corporation has a significant amount of assets available for raising funds through these channels.
Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered certificates of deposit, and public funds deposits,
continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 68% of the
Corporations total assets as of September 30, 2010 and 75% as of December 31, 2009. The decrease
in the ratio of deposits to total assets from the end of 2009 to September 30, 2010 was directly
related to the aforementioned Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. As shown in the Westernbank
FDIC-assisted Transaction section of this MD&A, the acquired loans (book value prior to purchase
accounting adjustments) exceeded substantially the assumed liabilities, and as such, the
Corporation funded the acquisition by issuing a note to the FDIC. The FDIC retained substantially
all of Westernbanks brokered certificates of deposit, which for former Westernbank entity
represented a major funding source for its earning assets.
In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. As of
September 30, 2010, these borrowings consisted primarily of the note issued to the FDIC as part of
the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, FHLB borrowings, securities sold under agreement to
repurchase, junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and term notes. Refer to Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements for the composition of the Corporations borrowings as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The most significant variance in the Corporations
borrowings composition from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 is primarily related to the
note issued to the FDIC.
The composition of the Corporations financing to total assets as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 is included in Table Q.
TABLE Q
Financing to Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% increase (decrease) from |
|
% of total assets |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, 2009 to |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Non-interest bearing
deposits |
|
$ |
5,371 |
|
|
$ |
4,495 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Interest-bearing core
deposits |
|
|
15,883 |
|
|
|
14,983 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
Other interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
6,486 |
|
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Other short-term
borrowings |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
4,109 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
N.M. means
not meaningful
Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the
banking and non-banking subsidiaries. Also, it is managed at the level of the banking and
non-banking subsidiaries.
The following sections provide further information on the Corporations major funding activities
and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities.
Banking Subsidiaries
Primary sources of funding for the Corporations banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or the
banking subsidiaries, include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, collateralized
borrowings, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the
Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the Discount Window of the Fed, and
have a considerable amount of collateral pledged that
151
can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities. Furthermore, during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, the BHCs made capital contributions to BPNA and BPPR amounting to $495
million and $600 million, respectively. BPNA has received capital contributions in order to ensure
it maintains its well-capitalized status. The capital contribution to BPPR was done to strengthen
its regulatory capital ratios upon executing the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. As
indicated previously, during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, BPPR issued a note to the FDIC as
part of the consideration paid in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. As
indicated in a previous section of this MD&A, during the third quarter of 2010, BPPR prepaid $2.1
billion of the outstanding balance of the note issued to the FDIC. Funds for the repayment were
principally obtained from excess liquidity maintained in cash with the Fed, and to a lesser extent,
a combination of proceeds from sales of investment securities with unrealized gains, FHLB advances
and repurchase agreements. The note issued to the FDIC was selected for partial repayment because
it resulted in more favorable economics for the Corporation than prepaying other of its
liabilities, which entailed prepayment penalties. This FDIC obligation was also of sufficient size
to permit the Corporation to deploy its excess liquidity.
The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment
portfolio purchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational
expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting
requirements for some derivative transactions and recourse obligations; off-balance sheet
activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments; recourse provisions; servicing
advances; derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds
administered by BPPR.
The bank operating subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in
funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available
liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form
of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in
addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that
require the banking subsidiaries to have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings
and a portion of deposits. In addition, the total loan portfolio is funded with deposits with the
exception of the Westernbank acquisition which is partially funded with the note issued to the
FDIC.
The Corporations ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding
brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and
financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized
credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the
credit rating of the Corporation may impact its ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or
the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact
should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporations banking subsidiaries are federally insured
(subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the effect of a downgrade in the credit
ratings.
Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings
and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table I for a breakdown of
deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and
institutional customers. As indicated in the glossary, for purposes of defining core deposits, the
Corporation excludes brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have
historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost
funds. Core deposits totaled $21.3 billion, or 77% of total deposits, as of September 30, 2010,
compared with $19.5 billion, or 75% of total deposits, as of December 31, 2009. Core deposits
financed 61% of the Corporations earning assets as of September 30, 2010, compared to 60% as of
December 31, 2009.
152
Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over as of September 30, 2010 totaled
$4.8 billion, or 17% of total deposits, compared to $4.7 billion, or 18%, as of December 31, 2009.
Their distribution by maturity as of September 30, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 months or less |
|
$ |
1,898,184 |
|
3 to 6 months |
|
|
720,406 |
|
6 to 12 months |
|
|
956,355 |
|
Over 12 months |
|
|
1,203,366 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,778,311 |
|
|
The Corporations banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized
with the FHLB aggregating $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with
the FHLB at those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $693 million
as of September 30, 2010 and $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009. Such advances are collateralized
by securities and mortgage loans, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable
features. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on
the terms of FHLB advances outstanding. As indicated in the Operating Expenses section of this
MD&A, the Corporation extinguished $180 million of FHLB advances borrowed by BPNA.
As of September 30, 2010, the banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Feds Discount
Window of approximately $2.7 billion, which remained unused as of that date. This compares to a
borrowing capacity at the Fed discount window of $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2009, which was
also unused. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under
difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon
the balance of performing loans and securities pledged as collateral and the haircuts assigned to
such collateral.
The Corporation incurred $9.7 million in prepayment penalties during the quarter ended September
30, 2010 on the cancellation of $180 million of FHLB advances and $54 million in public fund
certificates of deposit as part of BPNAs deployment of excess liquidity and as part of a strategy
to increase margin in future periods.
As of September 30, 2010, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current
and projected liquidity sources to meet its anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special
needs and off-balance sheet commitments, during the foreseeable future and have sufficient
liquidity resources to address a stress event.
Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction and Impact on Liquidity
Apart from the impact of the note issued to the FDIC that was described above, the Corporations
liquidity is also impacted by the loan payment performance and reimbursements on the loss sharing
agreements.
In the short-term, there may be a significant amount of the covered loans acquired in the
FDIC-assisted transaction that will experience deterioration in payment performance, or will be
determined to have inadequate collateral values to repay the loans. In such instances, the
Corporation will likely no longer receive payments from the borrowers, which will impact cash
flows. The loss sharing agreements will not fully offset the financial effects of such a situation.
However, if a loan is subsequently charged off or written down after the Corporation exhausts its
best efforts at collection, the loss sharing agreements will cover 80% of the loss associated with
the covered loans, offsetting most of any deterioration in the performance of the covered loans.
The effects of the loss sharing agreements on cash flows and operating results in the long-term
will be similar to the short-term effects described above. The long-term effects that we may
experience will depend primarily on the ability of the borrowers whose loans are covered by the
loss sharing agreements to make payments over time. As the loss sharing agreements are in effect
for a period of ten years for one-to-four family loans and five years for commercial, construction
and consumer loans, changing economic conditions will likely impact the timing of future
charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture
of interest income and recognition of cash flows from the borrowers or received from the FDIC (as
part of the FDIC loss share receivable) may be recognized unevenly over this period, as management
exhausts its collection efforts under the Corporations normal practices.
153
Bank Holding Companies
The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment
securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory
limits), asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds
from new borrowings or stock issuances. The principal source of cash flows for the parent holding
company during the second quarter of 2010 was the aforementioned capital issuance of $1.1 billion,
which was completed primarily to strengthen the Corporations regulatory capital ratios in
preparation for the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, and proceeds from the sale of the
ownership interest in EVERTEC during the third quarter of 2010. During the third quarter of 2010,
the Corporation received $528.6 million, net of transaction costs and taxes, from the sale of
EVERTEC. The principal use of these funds include capitalizing its banking subsidiaries, the
repayment of debt, and interest payments to holders of senior debt and trust preferred securities.
The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends to common and preferred stockholders during 2009
as a result of dividend restrictions imposed by regulators and in order to conserve capital.
The Corporations bank holding companies (BHCs, Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Inc. and
Popular International Bank, Inc.) have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the
corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries. However, the cash needs
of the Corporations non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness are now minimal
given that the PFH business was discontinued. These sources of funding have become more costly due
to the reductions in the Corporations credit ratings. The Corporations principal credit ratings
are at a level below investment grade which affects the Corporations ability to raise funds in
the capital markets. The Corporation has an open-ended, automatic shelf registration statement
filed and effective with the SEC, which permits us to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity
securities.
A principal use of liquidity at the BHCs is to ensure its subsidiaries are adequately capitalized.
Operating losses at the BPNA banking subsidiary have required the BHCs to contribute equity capital
to BPNA to ensure that it meets the regulatory guidelines for well-capitalized institutions. In
the event that additional capital contributions were necessary, management believes that the BHCs
currently have enough liquidity resources to meet potential capital needs from BPNA in the ordinary
course of business. As indicated previously, the BHCs made substantial capital contributions to the
banking subsidiaries during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The maturities of the bank holding companies outstanding notes payable as of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 are shown in the table below. These borrowings are principally unsecured
senior debt (term notes) and junior subordinated debentures (trust preferred securities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
3,675 |
|
|
|
353,675 |
|
2012 |
|
|
374,389 |
|
|
|
274,183 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Later years |
|
|
439,800 |
|
|
|
439,800 |
|
No stated maturity |
|
|
936,000 |
[1] |
|
|
936,000 |
[1] |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
1,756,864 |
|
|
$ |
2,008,658 |
|
Less: Discount |
|
|
(496,678) |
[1] |
|
|
(512,350) |
[1] |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,260,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,496,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
|
Amounts are related to junior subordinated debentures associated with
the trust preferred securities that were issued to the U.S. Treasury in
August 2009. |
The reduction in the maturity of unsecured senior debt from the 2011 maturity classification
was the result of three events: (1) the exercise of a put option by the holder of $75 million in
term notes during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and (2) the extension of the maturity of $100
million in term notes from September 2011 to March 2012 based on modifications negotiated with the
note holders during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which set a fixed interest rate of 13%, and
(3) the repurchase and cancellation in July 2010 of $175 million in term notes with interest that
adjusted in the event of senior debt rating downgrades. These floating rate term notes had an
interest rate of 9.75% over the 3-month LIBOR with a maturity date of September 2011.
154
The Corporation no longer has outstanding any term notes with rating triggers or in which the
holders have the right to require the Corporation to purchase the notes prior to its contractual
maturity.
The repayment of the BHCs obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met
with internal liquidity resources, new borrowings, and the cash inflows from the sale of the 51%
ownership interest in EVERTEC completed in September 2010.
The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and
other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the
foreseeable future.
The Corporations short-term and long-term debt ratings and outlook by major rating agencies as of
September 30, 2010 are presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Popular, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Short-term |
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
debt |
|
debt |
|
Outlook |
|
Fitch
|
|
B
|
|
B
|
|
Positive |
Moodys
|
|
|
|
Ba1
|
|
Negative |
S&P
|
|
C
|
|
B
|
|
Positive |
|
In November 2010, Moodys Investors Service downgraded the ratings of 10 large U.S. regional
banks after reducing its government support assumptions for these entities. The affected entities,
whose ratings were placed on review for possible downgrade on July 27, 2010, had benefited from
Moodys support assumptions since 2009. The rating of the Corporations banking subsidiary was
reduced by one notch, to Baa3, which is investment grade. It was driven by Moodys opinion that the
likelihood of federal government support for banks in the event of stress, is less likely as
signaled in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The ratings of the BHCs
was not impacted by the ratings action.
The Corporations banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major
rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured
borrowings. The banking subsidiaries did have $18 million in deposits as of September 30, 2010 that
are subject to rating triggers. As of September 30, 2010, the Corporation had repurchase agreements
amounting to $229 million that were subject to rating triggers or the maintenance of
well-capitalized regulatory capital ratios, and were collateralized with securities with a fair
value of $242 million.
Some of the Corporations derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the banks
well-capitalized status and credit ratings. These agreements could require exposure
collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a
liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $84 million as of September 30,
2010, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $98 million to cover the net liability
position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.
In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties
include rating covenants. Based on BPPRs failure to maintain the required credit ratings, the
third parties could have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian
for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as
discussed in the Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments section of this MD&A, the
Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain
contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse
obligations if the institutions required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by
the Corporation to secure recourse obligations approximated $166 million as of September 30, 2010.
The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management
expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The
requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could
reduce the Corporations liquidity resources and impact its operating results.
155
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporations management, with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
quarter ended on September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business. Based on the opinion of legal counsel, management believes that
the final disposition of these matters, except for the matters described below which are each in
early stages and management cannot currently predict their outcome, will not have a material
adverse effect on the Corporations business, results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity.
Between May 14, 2009 and September 9, 2009, five putative class actions and two derivative claims
were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico
Court of First Instance, San Juan Part, against Popular, Inc., certain of its directors and
officers, among others. The five class actions have now been consolidated into two separate
actions: a securities class action captioned Hoff v. Popular, Inc., et al. (consolidated with Otero
v. Popular, Inc., et al.) and an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action
entitled In re Popular, Inc. ERISA Litigation (comprised of the consolidated cases of Walsh v.
Popular, Inc. et al.; Montañez v. Popular, Inc., et al.; and Dougan v. Popular, Inc., et al.).
On October 19, 2009, plaintiffs in the Hoff case filed a consolidated class action complaint which
included as defendants the underwriters in the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock, among
others. The consolidated action purports to be on behalf of purchasers of Populars securities
between January 24, 2008 and February 19, 2009 and alleges that the defendants violated Section
10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act by issuing a series of allegedly false and/or misleading statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading. The
consolidated action also alleges that the defendants violated Section 11, Section 12(a)(2) and
Section 15 of the Securities Act by making allegedly untrue statements and/or omitting to disclose
material facts necessary to make statements made by the Corporation not false and misleading in
connection with the May 2008 offering of Series B Preferred Stock. The consolidated securities
class action complaint seeks class certification, an award of compensatory damages and reasonable
costs and expenses, including counsel fees. On January 11, 2010, Popular, the underwriter
defendants and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated securities class action
complaint. On August 2, 2010, the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the
motion to dismiss filed by the underwriter defendants on statute of limitations grounds. The Court
also dismissed the Section 11 claim brought against Populars directors on statute of limitations
grounds and the Section 12(a)(2) claim brought against Popular because plaintiffs lacked standing.
The Court declined to dismiss the claims brought against Popular and certain of its officers under
Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder),
156
Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act, holding that
plaintiffs had adequately alleged that defendants made materially false and misleading statements
with the requisite state of mind.
On November 30, 2009, plaintiffs in the ERISA case filed a consolidated class action complaint. The
consolidated complaint purports to be on behalf of employees participating in the Popular, Inc.
U.S.A. 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan and the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment
Plan from January 24, 2008 to the date of the Complaint to recover losses pursuant to Sections 409
and 502(a)(2) of ERISA against Popular, certain directors, officers and members of plan committees,
each of whom is alleged to be a plan fiduciary. The consolidated complaint alleges that the
defendants breached their alleged fiduciary obligations by, among other things, failing to
eliminate Popular stock as an investment alternative in the plans. The complaint seeks to recover
alleged losses to the plans and equitable relief, including injunctive relief and a constructive
trust, along with costs and attorneys fees. On December 21, 2009, and in compliance with a
scheduling order issued by the Court, Popular and the individual defendants submitted an answer to
the amended complaint. Shortly thereafter, on December 31, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint or, in the
alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. On May 5, 2010, a magistrate judge issued a report and
recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss be denied except with respect to
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as to which he recommended that the motion be granted. On May 19,
2010, Popular filed objections to the magistrate judges report and recommendation. On June 21,
2010, plaintiffs filed a response to these objections. On July 9, 2010, with leave of the Court,
Popular filed a reply to plaintiffs response. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order
without opinion granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss and providing that the
Court would issue an opinion and order explaining its decision. To date, no opinion has been
issued. Discovery is ongoing in the ERISA case, and the parties have agreed to coordinate
discovery with respect to common issues with discovery in the García and Hoff cases.
The derivative actions (García v. Carrión, et al. and Díaz v. Carrión, et al.) have been brought
purportedly for the benefit of nominal defendant Popular, Inc. against certain executive officers
and directors and allege breaches of fiduciary duty, waste of assets and abuse of control in
connection with our issuance of allegedly false and misleading financial statements and financial
reports and the offering of the Series B Preferred Stock. The derivative complaints seek a judgment
that the action is a proper derivative action, an award of damages and restitution, and costs and
disbursements, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses. On October 9, 2009, the
Court coordinated for purposes of discovery the García action and the consolidated securities class
action. On October 15, 2009, Popular and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the García
complaint for failure to make a demand on the Board of Directors prior to initiating litigation. On
November 20, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, and on December 21, 2009, Popular and the
individual defendants moved to dismiss the García amended complaint. At a scheduling conference
held on January 14, 2010, the Court stayed discovery in both the Hoff and García matters pending
resolution of their respective motions to dismiss. On August 11, 2010, the Court granted in part
and denied in part the motion to dismiss the Garcia action. The Court dismissed the gross
mismanagement and corporate waste claims, but declined to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty
claim. Discovery has now commenced in the Hoff and Garcia actions and is to proceed in coordinated
fashion. At the Courts request, the parties to the Hoff and Garcia cases discussed the prospect
of mediation and have agreed to nonbinding mediation in an attempt to determine whether the cases
can be settled.
The Díaz case, filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance, San Juan, was removed to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. On October 13, 2009, Popular and the individual
defendants moved to consolidate the García and Díaz actions. On October 26, 2009, plaintiff moved
to remand the Díaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance and to stay defendants
consolidation motion pending the outcome of the remand proceedings. On September 30, 2010, the
Court issued an order without opinion remanding the Diaz case to the Puerto Rico Court of First
Instance. On October 13, 2010, the Court issued a Statement of Reasons In Support of Remand Order.
On October 28, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved for reconsideration of the remand
order. The reconsideration motion is pending.
On April 13, 2010, the Puerto Rico Court of First Instance in San Juan granted summary judgment
dismissing a separate complaint brought by plaintiff in the García action that sought to enforce an
alleged right to inspect the books and records of the Corporation in support of the pending
derivative action. The Court held that the plaintiff had not propounded a proper purpose under
Puerto Rico law for such inspection. On April 28, 2010, the plaintiff
157
in that action moved for reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On May 4, 2010, the Court denied
plaintiffs request for reconsideration. On June 7, 2010, plaintiff filed an appeal before the
Puerto Rico Court of Appeals. On June 11, 2010, Popular and the individual defendants moved to
dismiss the appeal. On June 22, 2010, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. On July 6, 2010,
plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Courts dismissal. On July 16, 2010, the Court of
Appeals denied plaintiffs request for reconsideration.
On October 7, 2010, a new putative class action suit for breach
of contract and damages, captioned Almeyda-Santiago v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, was filed in the Puerto Rico Court of First
Instance against Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The complaint essentially asserts that plaintiff has suffered damages because of Banco
Populars alleged fraudulent
overdraft fee practices in connection with debit card transactions. Such practices allegedly consist of: (a) the reorganization
of electronic debit transactions in high-to-low order so as to multiply the number of overdraft fees assessed on its customers; (b)
the assessment of overdraft fees even when clients have not overdrawn their accounts; (c) the failure to disclose, or to adequately
disclose, its overdraft policy to its customers; and (d) the provision of false and fraudulent information regarding its clients
account balances at point of sale transactions and on its website. Plaintiff seeks damages, restitution and provisional remedies
against Banco Popular for breach of contract, abuse of trust, illegal conversion and unjust enrichment. We intend to contend vigorously
these claims.
At this early stage, it is not possible for management to assess the probability of an adverse
outcome, or reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss. It is possible that the ultimate
resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporations results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the
factors discussed under Part IItem 1ARisk Factors in our 2009 Form 10-K, as supplemented and
updated by the discussion below. These factors could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our
actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the
forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to the discussion in Part IItem
2Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this
report for additional information that may supplement or update the discussion of risk factors in
our 2009 Form 10-K.
The risks described in our 2009 Form 10-K and in this report are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Risks related to the Business Environment and our Industry
Further deterioration in collateral values of properties securing our construction, commercial
and mortgage loan portfolios
Further deterioration of the value of real estate collateral securing our construction, commercial
and mortgage loan portfolios may result in increased credit losses. As of September 30, 2010,
approximately 6%, 53% and 21% of our loan portfolio not covered under the FDIC loss share
agreements, consisted of construction, commercial and mortgage loans, respectively.
Substantially our entire loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy.
Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the British Virgin
Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of our loan portfolio and the collateral value
backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific
real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico
indicate that certain pockets of the real estate market are subject to reductions in value related
to general economic conditions. In certain mainland markets like southern Florida, Illinois and
California, we have been seeing the negative impact associated with low absorption rates and
property value adjustments due to overbuilding. We measure the impairment based on the fair value
of the collateral, if collateral dependent, which is derived from estimated collateral values,
principally appraisal reports, that take into consideration prices in observed transactions
involving similar assets in similar locations, size and supply and demand. An appraisal report is
only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made. If the appraisal
does not reflect the amount that may be obtained upon any sale or foreclosure of the property, we
may not realize an amount equal to the indebtedness secured by the property. In addition, given the
current slowdown in the real estate market in Puerto Rico, the properties securing these loans may
be difficult to dispose of, if foreclosed.
Construction and commercial loans, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate
properties entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are
larger in size, may have less collateral coverage, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and
are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. As of September 30, 2010, commercial and
construction loans secured by commercial and residential real estate properties, excluding loans
covered under FDIC loss share agreements, amounted to $8.4 billion or 38% of the total loan
portfolio, excluding covered loans.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net charge-offs specifically related to values of
properties securing our construction, commercial and mortgage loan portfolios totaled $175.4
million, $113.8 million and $76.0 million respectively. Continued deterioration on the fair value
of real estate properties for collateral dependent impaired loans would require increases in the
Corporations provision for loan losses and allowance for loan losses. Any such increase would have
an adverse effect on our future financial condition and results of operations. For more information
on the credit quality of our construction, commercial and mortgage portfolio see the Credit Risk
Management and Loan Quality section of the Managements Discussion and Analysis included in this
Form 10-Q.
Risks Related to the FDIC-assisted Transaction
We entered into an FDIC-assisted transaction involving Westernbank Puerto Rico (the FDIC-assisted
transaction), which could present additional risks to our business.
On April 30, 2010, Popular, Inc.s banking subsidiary, Banco Popular of Puerto Rico (BPPR),
acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Puerto Rico-based Westernbank Puerto
Rico (Westernbank) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) in an assisted
transaction (herein, the FDIC-assisted transaction). Although this transaction provides for FDIC
assistance to BPPR to mitigate certain risks, such as sharing exposure to loan losses (80% of the
losses in substantially all the acquired portfolio will be borne by the FDIC) and providing
indemnification against certain liabilities of the former Westernbank, we are still subject to some
of the same risks we would face in acquiring another bank in a negotiated transaction. Such risks
include risks associated with maintaining customer relationships and failure to realize the
anticipated acquisition benefits in the amounts and within the timeframes we expect. In addition,
because the FDIC-assisted transaction was structured in a manner that did not allow bidders the
time and access to information normally associated with preparing for and evaluating a negotiated
transaction, we may face additional risks in the FDIC-assisted transaction.
The success of the FDIC-assisted transaction will depend on a number of uncertain factors.
The success of the FDIC-assisted transaction will depend on a number of factors, including,
without limitation:
|
|
|
our ability to limit the outflow of deposits held by our new customers in the acquired
branches and to successfully retain and manage interest-earning assets (i.e., loans)
acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to attract new deposits and to generate new interest-earning assets in the
areas previously served by the former Westernbank branches; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to control the incremental non-interest expense from the former Westernbank
branches and other units in a manner that enables us to maintain a favorable overall
efficiency ratio; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to collect on the loans acquired and satisfy the standard requirements
imposed in the loss sharing agreements; and |
158
|
|
|
our ability to earn acceptable levels of interest and non-interest income, including fee
income, from the acquired branches. |
The FDIC-assisted transaction increases BPPRs commercial real estate and construction loan
portfolio, which have a greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans.
With the acquisition of most of the former Westernbanks loan portfolio, the commercial real estate
loan and construction loan portfolios represent a larger portion of BPPRs total loan portfolio
than prior to the FDIC-assisted transaction. This type of lending is generally considered to have
more complex credit risks than traditional single-family residential or consumer lending, because
the principal is concentrated in a limited number of loans with repayment dependent on the
successful operation or completion of the related real estate or construction project.
Consequently, these loans are more sensitive to the current adverse conditions in the real estate
market and the general economy. These loans are generally less predictable, more difficult to
evaluate and monitor, and their collateral may be more difficult to dispose of in a market decline.
Furthermore, since these loans are to Puerto Rico based borrowers, the Corporations credit
exposure concentration in Puerto Rico increased as a result of the acquisition. Although, the
negative economic aspects of these risks are substantially reduced as a result of the FDIC loss
sharing agreements, changes in national and local economic conditions could lead to higher loan
charge-offs in connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction all of which would not be supported by
the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.
We acquired significant portfolios of loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction. Although these loan
portfolios will be initially accounted for at fair value, there is no assurance that the loans we
acquired will not become impaired, which may result in additional charge-offs to this portfolio.
The fluctuations in national, regional and local economic conditions, including those related to
local residential, commercial real estate and construction markets, may increase the level of
charge-offs that we make to our loan portfolio, and consequently, reduce our net income, and may
also increase the level of charge-offs on the loan portfolio that we have acquired and
correspondingly reduce our net income. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled
and may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition even if other
favorable events occur.
Although we have entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC which provide that 80% of
losses related to specified loan portfolios that we have acquired in connection with the
FDIC-assisted transaction will be borne by the FDIC, we are not protected for all losses resulting
from charge-offs with respect to those specified loan portfolios. Additionally, the loss sharing
agreements have limited terms; therefore, any charge-off of related losses that we experience after
the term of the loss sharing agreements will not be reimbursed by the FDIC and will negatively
impact our results of operations. The loss sharing agreements also impose standard requirements on
us which must be satisfied in order to retain loss share protections. The FDIC has the right to
refuse or delay payment for loan losses if the loss sharing agreements are not managed in
accordance with their terms.
Our decisions regarding the fair value of assets acquired could be inaccurate and our estimated
loss share indemnification asset in the FDIC-assisted transaction may be inadequate, which could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and
future prospects.
Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of acquired loan
portfolios, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other
assets serving as collateral for the repayment of secured loans. In the FDIC-assisted transaction,
we may record a loss share indemnification asset that we consider adequate to absorb future losses
which may occur in the acquired loan portfolio. In determining the size of the loss share
indemnification asset, we analyze the loan portfolio based on historical loss experience, volume
and classification of loans, volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, local economic
conditions, and other pertinent information. If our assumptions are incorrect, our current
indemnification asset may be insufficient to cover future loan losses, and increased loss reserves
may be needed to respond to different economic conditions or adverse developments in the acquired
loan portfolio. However, in the event expected losses from the Westernbank portfolio were to
increase more than originally expected, the related increase in loss reserves would be largely
offset by higher than expected indemnity payments from the FDIC. Any increase in future loan losses
could have a negative effect on our operating results.
159
Our ability to obtain reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements on covered assets depends on
our compliance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements.
Management must certify to the FDIC on a monthly and quarterly basis our compliance with the terms
of the FDIC loss share agreements as a prerequisite to obtaining reimbursement from the FDIC for
realized losses on covered assets. The required terms of the agreements are extensive and failure
to comply with any of the guidelines could result in a specific asset or group of assets
permanently losing their loss sharing coverage. Under the terms of the FDIC loss share agreements,
the assignment or transfer of the loss sharing agreements to another entity generally requires the
written consent of the FDIC. No assurances can be given that we will manage the covered assets in
such a way as to always maintain loss share coverage on all such assets.
Goodwill recorded on the FDIC-assisted transaction may increase or decrease during a one year
period following the FDIC-assisted transaction acquisition date.
The goodwill recorded in connection with the Westerbank FDIC-assisted transaction is preliminary
and subject to revision for a period of one year following the April 30, 2010 acquisition date.
Adjustments may be recorded based on additional information received after the acquisition date
that may affect the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Downward adjustments in
the values of assets acquired or increases in values of liabilities assumed on the date of
acquisition would increase the preliminary goodwill recorded.
Risks Related to the EVERTEC Sale Transaction
We sold 51% interest in our merchant acquiring and processing and technology business. The loss of
income from the sale of the 51% interest could have an adverse effect on the Corporations earnings
and future growth.
On September 30, 2010, we sold 51% majority interest in the Corporations merchant acquiring and
processing and technology business and retained a 49% interest. We will have a reduction in
revenues from the sold portion of the merchant acquiring and processing and technology business,
which for the foreseeable future we do not expect will be offset by our participation in the
earnings of EVERTEC, which will be adversely impacted by the amount of debt incurred in connection
with the transaction.
We entered into a Master Services Agreement pursuant to which EVERTEC will provide services to the
Corporation and its subsidiaries on an exclusive basis.
As part of the EVERTEC transaction, the Corporation entered into a Master Services Agreement
pursuant to which EVERTEC will provide various processing and information technology services to
the Corporation and its subsidiaries on an exclusive basis. As we now rely on a third party for
the provision of these services, there can be no assurances that the quality of the services will
be appropriate nor that the third party will continue to provide us with the necessary financial
transaction processing and technology services.
Risk Related to Regulatory Reform
Recently adopted financial reform legislation will impose significant new limitations on our
business activities and subject us to increased regulation and additional costs.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). The Dodd-Frank Act implements significant changes in the
regulation of financial institutions and will fundamentally change the system of oversight
described under Item 1. BusinessRegulation and Supervision and Regulation in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Although we cannot predict how regulatory
implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act will occur, the related findings of various regulatory and
commission studies, the interpretations issued as part of the rulemaking process and the final
regulations that are issued with respect to various elements of the new law may cause changes that
impact the profitability of our business activities and require that we change certain of our
business practices, and could expose us to additional costs (including increased compliance costs).
These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make
any necessary changes.
We and our subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as EVERTEC, conduct business with financial
institutions and/or card payment networks operating in countries whose nationals, including some of
our customers customers, engage in transactions in countries that are the targets of U.S. economic
sanctions and embargoes. If we or our subsidiaries or affiliates or EVERTEC are found to have
failed to comply with applicable U.S. sanctions laws and regulations in these instances, we could
be exposed to fines, sanctions and other penalties or other governmental investigations.
We and our subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as EVERTEC, conduct business with financial
institutions and/or card payment networks operating in countries whose nationals, including some of
our customers customers, engage in transactions in countries that are the target of U.S. economic
sanctions and embargoes, including Cuba. As U.S.-based entities, we and our subsidiaries and
affiliates, as well as EVERTEC, are obligated to comply with the economic sanctions regulations
administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
These regulations prohibit U.S.-based entities from entering into or facilitating unlicensed
transactions with, for the benefit of, or in some cases involving the property and property
interests of, persons, governments or countries designated by the U.S. government under one or more
sanctions regimes. Failure to comply with these sanctions and embargoes may result in material
fines, sanctions or other penalties being imposed on us. In addition, various state and municipal
governments, universities and other investors maintain prohibitions or restrictions on investments
in companies that do business involving countries or entities, and this could adversely affect the
market for our securities.
For these reasons, we have established risk-based policies and procedures designed to assist us and
our personnel in complying with applicable U.S. laws and regulations. EVERTEC has also done this.
These policies and procedures employ software to screen transactions for evidence of
sanctioned-country and persons involvement. Consistent with a risk-based approach and the
difficulties in identifying all transactions of our customers customers that may involve a
sanctioned country, there can be no assurance that our policies and procedures will prevent us from
violating applicable U.S. laws and regulations in transactions in which we engage, and such
violations could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In June 2010, EVERTEC discovered potential violations of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations
(CACR), which are administered by OFAC, due to an oversight in which the screening parameters for
two customers located in Haiti and Belize were not activated. EVERTEC initiated an internal review
and submitted an initial voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC. We have agreed to indemnify EVERTEC for
claims or damages related to the economic sanctions regulations administered by OFAC, including
these potential violations of the CACR.
Separately, in September 2010 EVERTEC submitted an initial voluntary self-disclosure to OFAC
regarding the processing of certain Cuba-related credit card transactions involving Costa Rica and
Venezuela that it believed could not be rejected under governing local law and policies,
but which nevertheless may have not been consistent with the CACR. The voluntary self-disclosure
also covered the transmission, through EVERTECs Costa Rica subsidiary, of data relating to debit
card payment initiated by people traveling in Cuba. We have agreed to indemnify EVERTEC for claims
or damages related to these potential violations of the CACR. We cannot predict the timing, total
costs or ultimate outcome of any OFAC review, or to what extent, if at all, we could be subject to
indemnification claims, fines, sanctions or other penalties.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In April 2004, the Corporations shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. The Corporation has to date used shares purchased in the market to make grants under the
Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted under this Plan is
10,000,000.
The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not in thousands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Maximum Number of Shares |
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Purchased as Part of Publicly |
|
that May Yet be Purchased |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Announced Plans or Programs |
|
Under the Plans or Programs [a] |
|
July 1 July 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,774,016 |
|
August 1 August 31
|
|
|
30,434 |
|
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
|
30,434 |
|
|
|
6,743,582 |
|
September 1 September 30
|
|
|
29,284 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
29,284 |
|
|
|
6,723,652 |
|
|
Total September 30, 2010
|
|
|
59,718 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
|
|
59,718 |
|
|
|
6,723,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
[a] |
|
Includes shares forfeited. |
160
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
2.1
|
|
Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 8, 2010,
among Popular, Inc., EVERTEC, Inc., AP Carib Holdings, Ltd. and Carib
Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Corporations
Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2010 and filed on August 12, 2010). |
|
2.2
|
|
Third Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 15, 2010,
among Popular, Inc., EVERTEC, Inc., AP Carib Holdings, Ltd. and Carib
Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Corporations
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2010 and filed on September 21, 2010). |
|
2.3
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 30, 2010,
among
Popular, Inc., EVERTEC, Inc., AP Carib Holdings, Ltd. and Carib Acquisition,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K dated September 30, 2010 and filed on October 6, 2010). |
|
10.1
|
|
Employment offer to Mr. Carlos J. Vázquez, as President of Banco Popular North
America. |
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends. |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
161
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
POPULAR, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Jorge A. Junquera
|
|
|
|
Jorge A. Junquera |
|
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo
|
|
|
|
Ileana Gonzalez Quevedo |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President & Corporate Comptroller |
|
|
162