e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-6903
Trinity Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
75-0225040 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2525 Stemmons Freeway
Dallas, Texas
|
|
75207-2401 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (214) 631-4420
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o
Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ.
At
July 24, 2009 there were 79,279,419 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding.
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008, the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, and the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 have been adjusted due to
the adoption of new accounting pronouncements. See Notes 9 and 15 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for an explanation of the effects of these pronouncements.
1
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(adjusted - see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(adjusted - see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes 9 and 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes 9 and 15) |
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
716.1 |
|
|
$ |
945.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,509.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,844.4 |
|
Operating costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
586.1 |
|
|
|
730.5 |
|
|
|
1,247.4 |
|
|
|
1,447.0 |
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses |
|
|
47.3 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
958.4 |
|
|
|
795.5 |
|
|
|
1,668.6 |
|
|
|
1,568.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
(242.3 |
) |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
(159.0 |
) |
|
|
276.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(266.3 |
) |
|
|
136.2 |
|
|
|
(211.1 |
) |
|
|
242.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(56.9 |
) |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(209.4 |
) |
|
|
84.2 |
|
|
|
(175.4 |
) |
|
|
148.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
benefit for income taxes of $0.0, $0.0, $0.0,
and $(0.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(209.4 |
) |
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
(175.5 |
) |
|
$ |
148.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.75 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.75 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(2.75 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.75 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(adjusted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 9) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
440.9 |
|
|
$ |
161.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance |
|
|
215.2 |
|
|
|
251.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
|
175.9 |
|
|
|
353.0 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
111.2 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
147.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369.3 |
|
|
|
611.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost |
|
|
3,928.9 |
|
|
|
3,843.5 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(929.7 |
) |
|
|
(852.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,999.2 |
|
|
|
2,990.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
180.8 |
|
|
|
504.0 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
306.5 |
|
|
|
293.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,530.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,911.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
111.7 |
|
|
$ |
217.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
353.4 |
|
|
|
481.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse, net of unamortized discount of $126.5 and $131.2 |
|
|
628.0 |
|
|
|
584.4 |
|
Non-recourse |
|
|
1,155.8 |
|
|
|
1,190.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,783.8 |
|
|
|
1,774.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income |
|
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
368.7 |
|
|
|
388.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,763.2 |
|
|
|
2,999.3 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock 1.5 shares authorized and unissued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock 200.0 shares authorized |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
596.1 |
|
|
|
612.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,238.9 |
|
|
|
1,427.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(111.0 |
) |
|
|
(161.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
(47.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,766.8 |
|
|
|
1,912.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,530.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,911.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(adjusted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 9) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(175.5 |
) |
|
$ |
148.0 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(47.5 |
) |
|
|
79.1 |
|
Gain on disposition of property, plant, equipment, and other assets |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
(38.5 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in income tax receivable |
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
|
|
242.3 |
|
|
|
(131.7 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(20.5 |
) |
|
|
(58.1 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
(106.2 |
) |
|
|
47.9 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
(83.3 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities continuing operations |
|
|
347.0 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
347.0 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of railcars from our lease fleet |
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
Proceeds from sales of railcars from our lease fleet sale and leaseback |
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant, equipment, and other assets |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
Capital expenditures lease subsidiary |
|
|
(243.8 |
) |
|
|
(426.1 |
) |
Capital expenditures manufacturing and other |
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
|
|
(51.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash required by investing activities |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(399.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Payments to retire debt |
|
|
(96.1 |
) |
|
|
(357.8 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
673.3 |
|
Stock repurchases |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
Dividends paid to common shareholders |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (required) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(53.7 |
) |
|
|
294.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
279.1 |
|
|
|
(79.6 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
161.8 |
|
|
|
289.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
440.9 |
|
|
$ |
210.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash
investing and financing activity:
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company acquired $39.0 million of equipment on lease through the
assumption of capital lease obligations.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
|
|
$1.00 Par |
|
|
of Par |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stock at |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Authorized) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Equity |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008
as originally reported |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
519.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,438.7 |
|
|
$ |
(161.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(47.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,831.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting
FSP APB 14-1 (see Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008 as
adjusted |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
612.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,427.0 |
|
|
$ |
(161.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(47.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,912.3 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175.5 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
(loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized
loss on derivative
financial instruments,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
Change in funded status
of pension liability,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
Other changes, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125.2 |
) |
Cash dividends on common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
Restricted shares issued, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
596.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,238.9 |
|
|
$ |
(111.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(38.9 |
) |
|
$ |
1,766.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared from the
books and records of Trinity Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (Trinity, Company, we, or
our). In our opinion, all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2009, the results of operations for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and cash flows for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 have been made in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the six month period ended
June 30, 2009 may not be indicative of expected results of operations for the year ending December
31, 2009. These interim financial statements and notes are condensed as permitted by the
instructions to Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements of the Company included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Amounts
previously reported have been adjusted as a result of the adoption of accounting pronouncements as
explained further under Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Notes 9 and 15. Certain prior year
balances have been reclassified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows to conform to the 2009 presentations.
Goodwill and Long-lived Assets
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), requires goodwill to be tested for impairment annually, or on an interim
basis, whenever events or circumstances change, indicating that the carrying amount of the asset
might be impaired. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process requiring the comparison of
the reporting units estimated fair value with the carrying amount of its net assets. Step two of
the impairment test is necessary to determine the amount of goodwill impairment to be recorded when
the reporting units recorded net assets exceed its fair value. We perform this test for our five
principal business segments, considered to be reporting units under the provisions of SFAS 142:
(1) the Rail Group, (2) the Construction Products Group, (3) the Inland Barge Group, (4) the Energy
Equipment Group, and (5) the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group.
During
the second quarter of 2009, there was a significant decline in new orders for railcars and continued weakening
demand for products in the Rail Group as well as a change in the
average estimated railcar deliveries from independent third party
research firms. Additionally, the significant number of idled railcars
in the North American fleet resulted in the creation of new internal
sales estimates by railcar type. Based on this information, we concluded that
indications of impairment existed with respect to the Rail Group which required an interim goodwill
impairment analysis and, accordingly, we performed such a test as of June 30, 2009. The table below
is an average of the estimates of approximate industry railcar deliveries for the next five years
from two independent third party research firms, Global Insight, Inc. and Economic Planning
Associates, Inc.
Average Estimated Railcar Deliveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 2009 |
|
As of May 2009 |
|
Percent Change |
2009 |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
)% |
2010 |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
15,100 |
|
|
|
(36.3 |
)% |
2011 |
|
|
41,550 |
|
|
|
29,150 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
)% |
2012 |
|
|
56,050 |
|
|
|
48,200 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
2013 |
|
|
62,550 |
|
|
|
59,750 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
Our estimate of the Rail Groups fair value (considered to be a level three fair value
measurement) utilized an income approach based on the anticipated future discounted cash flows of
the Rail Group, requiring significant estimates and judgments related to future revenues and
operating profits, exit multiples, tax rates and consequences, and discount rates based upon
market-based capital costs. Because the estimated fair value of the Rail Group was less than the
carrying amount of its net assets, we performed step two of our goodwill impairment analysis as
required by SFAS 142, by estimating the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of the Rail
Group in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations and SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. The result of our impairment analysis indicated that the remaining implied
goodwill amounted to $122.5 million for our Rail Group as of June 30, 2009 and, consequently, we
recorded an impairment charge of $325.0 million during the second quarter of 2009. The change in
our estimate of the Rail Groups enterprise value from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was
driven by economic indicators, including third-party studies that are predicting that the decline
in the railcar industry is likely to extend longer than was previously expected. In managements
opinion, no interim impairment tests were necessary for our remaining business segments as there
has not been a significant change in market conditions for these segments since the annual
impairment test.
6
Additionally, we performed an interim test for recoverability of the carrying value of our
Rail Group long-lived assets based on cash flow estimates consistent with those used in the
goodwill impairment test. The carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used is considered
impaired only when their carrying value is not recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows
and the fair value of the assets is less than their carrying value. We determined that there was
no impairment of the recoverability of the Rail Groups long-lived assets as the Rail Groups
estimated undiscounted future cash flows exceeded the carrying value of its long-lived assets.
Given the current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the potential impact on
our businesses, there can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions regarding the duration
of the ongoing economic downturn, or the period or strength of recovery, made for the purposes of
the long-lived asset and goodwill impairment tests during the second quarter of 2009 will prove to
be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows are not
achieved, it is possible that additional impairments of remaining goodwill and long-lived assets
may be required.
Stockholders Equity
On December 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million common stock
repurchase program allowing for repurchases through December 31, 2009. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, 813,028 and 471,100 shares were repurchased under this program at a cost of
approximately $6.3 million and $12.2 million, respectively. No shares were repurchased under this
program for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Since the inception of this program
through June 30, 2009, the Company has repurchased a total of 3,532,728 shares at a cost of
approximately $67.5 million.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. These new
standards significantly change the accounting for and reporting of business combination
transactions and noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests) in
consolidated financial statements. Both standards were effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008 and are applicable only to transactions occurring after the effective date. The
Company adopted this standard as of January 1, 2009; however, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, the Company did not enter into any transactions for which these standards would be
applicable.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 changes the
disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to
provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No.133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), and its related interpretations, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is intended to enhance the current disclosure framework in SFAS 133 and requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative
disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures
about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative agreements.
The provisions of SFAS 161 were effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company
adopted this standard as of January 1, 2009, and the impact of the adoption was not significant.
See Note 6 for required disclosures.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP
APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of certain convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that will reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest expense is
recognized in subsequent periods. The effective date of FSP APB 14-1 is for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and does not permit
earlier application. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1 as of January 1, 2009. See
Note 9 for a further explanation of the effects of implementing this pronouncement as it applies to
our Convertible Subordinated Notes.
7
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1). FSP
EITF 03-6-1 applies to the calculation of earnings per share for share-based payment awards with
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents under SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share
and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and all interim periods within those years. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP EITF
03-6-1 as of January 1, 2009. See Note 15 for a further explanation of the effects of implementing
this pronouncement.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1). FSP 107-1 amends FASB 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim
reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. The
effective date of FSP 107-1 is for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the provisions of
FSP 107-1 as of June 30, 2009. See Note 2 for required disclosures.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). This standard
requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and
whether that represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be
issued. This standard is not expected to result in significant changes in the subsequent events
that an entity reports, either through recognition or disclosure, in its financial statements. The
provisions for SFAS 165 were effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June
15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The Company adopted this standard on June 30, 2009,
and the impact of the adoption was not significant. Subsequent events through July 30, 2009 were
evaluated.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS
167), which amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) to address the elimination
of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. SFAS 167 also replaces the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling
financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation
to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, SFAS
167 provides more timely and useful information about an enterprises involvement with a variable
interest entity. SFAS 167 will become effective in the first quarter of 2010. We are currently
evaluating whether this standard will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 2. Fair Value Accounting
In September 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS
157 introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair
value measurements of assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities was
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted this standard as
of January 1, 2008, and the impact of the adoption was not significant.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid
to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market to that asset
or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS
157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. SFAS 157
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values which are listed below.
Level 1 This level is defined as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. The Companys cash equivalents and restricted assets, other than cash, are United
States Treasury instruments.
Level 2 This level is defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities. The Companys fuel derivative instruments, which are
commodity options, are valued using energy and commodity market data. Interest rate hedges are
valued at exit prices obtained from each counterparty.
Level 3 This level is defined as unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
8
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
366.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
366.3 |
|
Restricted assets (1) |
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
Fuel derivative instruments (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
488.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
489.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel derivative instruments (2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Interest rate hedges (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Restricted assets are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are comprised of cash equivalents. |
|
(2) |
|
Fuel derivative instruments are included in Other assets and Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest rate hedges are included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term debt at June 30, 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Convertible subordinated notes |
|
$ |
323.5 |
|
|
$ |
244.1 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
201.5 |
|
|
|
175.6 |
|
Term loan |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
Secured railcar equipment notes |
|
|
312.6 |
|
|
|
312.6 |
|
Warehouse facility |
|
|
298.6 |
|
|
|
298.6 |
|
Promissory notes |
|
|
544.6 |
|
|
|
544.6 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,783.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,678.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair values of our convertible subordinated notes and our senior notes were
based on quoted market prices as of June 30, 2009. The carrying
value of our warehouse facility, promissory notes, and term loan
approximate fair value because the interest rate adjusts to market
interest rates. The fair values of all other financial
instruments are estimated to approximate carrying value.
Note 3. Segment Information
The Company reports operating results in five principal business segments: (1) the Rail Group,
which manufactures and sells railcars and component parts; (2) the Construction Products Group,
which manufactures and sells highway products, concrete and aggregates, and asphalt; (3) the Inland
Barge Group, which manufactures and sells barges and related products for inland waterway services;
(4) the Energy Equipment Group, which manufactures and sells products for energy related
businesses, including tank heads, structural wind towers, and pressure and non-pressure containers
for the storage and transportation of liquefied gases and other liquid and dry products; and (5)
the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group, which provides fleet management, maintenance,
and leasing services. The category All Other includes our captive insurance and transportation
companies; legal, environmental, and upkeep costs associated with non-operating facilities; other
peripheral businesses; and the change in market valuation related to ineffective commodity hedges.
Sales and related net profits from the Rail Group to the Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group are recorded in the Rail Group and eliminated in consolidation. Sales between these
groups are recorded at prices comparable to those charged to external customers giving
consideration for quantity, features, and production demand. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet
are included in the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group. See Note 5 Equity Investment for
discussion of sales to a company in which we have an equity investment.
The financial information from continuing operations for these segments is shown in the tables
below. We operate principally in North America.
9
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
159.4 |
|
|
$ |
143.9 |
|
|
$ |
303.3 |
|
|
$ |
(328.7 |
) |
Construction Products Group |
|
|
152.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
153.3 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
132.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
134.4 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group |
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
All Other |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138.8 |
) |
|
|
(138.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
Eliminations Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
716.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
716.1 |
|
|
$ |
(242.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
334.9 |
|
|
$ |
255.7 |
|
|
$ |
590.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
Construction Products Group |
|
|
214.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
219.2 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
150.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.9 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
154.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
157.3 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group |
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
All Other |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252.6 |
) |
|
|
(252.6 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
Eliminations Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
945.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
945.5 |
|
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
322.1 |
|
|
$ |
265.1 |
|
|
$ |
587.2 |
|
|
$ |
(334.5 |
) |
Construction Products Group |
|
|
273.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
276.8 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
293.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.7 |
|
|
|
69.2 |
|
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
259.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
262.9 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group |
|
|
355.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355.9 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
All Other |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255.3 |
) |
|
|
(255.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Eliminations Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
1,509.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,509.6 |
|
|
$ |
(159.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Profit |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
682.6 |
|
|
$ |
475.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,158.4 |
|
|
$ |
149.6 |
|
Construction Products Group |
|
|
379.3 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
388.5 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
288.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288.7 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
280.5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
286.8 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group |
|
|
206.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.2 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
All Other |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(469.3 |
) |
|
|
(469.3 |
) |
|
|
(54.3 |
) |
Eliminations Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.5 |
) |
|
|
(51.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
1,844.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,844.4 |
|
|
$ |
276.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
The Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group (Leasing Group) provides fleet management,
maintenance, and leasing services. Selected combined financial information for the Leasing Group is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as reported) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
Leasing equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and other |
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
Equipment on lease |
|
|
3,016.0 |
|
|
|
2,973.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,053.7 |
|
|
|
3,010.2 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(266.5 |
) |
|
|
(232.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,787.2 |
|
|
|
2,777.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted assets |
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
120.2 |
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
Non-recourse |
|
|
1,155.8 |
|
|
|
1,190.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
133.5 |
|
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
|
$ |
355.9 |
|
|
$ |
206.2 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, revenues of $51.7 million and operating
profit of $4.1 million and revenues of $183.8 million and operating profit of $22.7 million,
respectively, were related to sales of railcars from the lease fleet to a company in which Trinity
holds an equity investment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, revenues of $8.3
million and operating profit of $1.4 million and revenues of $46.2 million and operating profit of
$7.2 million, respectively, were related to sales of railcars from the lease fleet to a company in
which Trinity holds an equity investment. See Note 5 Equity Investment.
The Leasing Groups interest expense, which is not a component of operating profit and
includes the effects of hedges related to the Leasing Groups debt, was $18.2 million and $36.5
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $16.4 million and $29.4
million, respectively, for the same periods last year. Rent expense, which is a component of
operating profit, was $11.4 million and $22.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively, and $11.2 million and $22.4 million, respectively, for the same periods last
year.
11
Equipment consists primarily of railcars leased by third parties. The Leasing Group purchases
equipment manufactured by Trinitys rail subsidiaries and enters into lease contracts with third
parties with terms generally ranging between one and twenty years. The Leasing Group primarily
enters into operating leases. Future contractual minimum rental revenues on leases in each year are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Contractual
Minimum Rental
Revenues on Leases
|
|
$ |
109.7 |
|
|
$ |
202.7 |
|
|
$ |
161.5 |
|
|
$ |
127.3 |
|
|
$ |
97.9 |
|
|
$ |
248.5 |
|
|
$ |
947.6 |
|
The Leasing Groups debt at June 30, 2009 consists of both recourse and non-recourse debt. In
February 2009, the Company repaid in full the $61 million of recourse debt outstanding at
December 31, 2008 while entering into a seven-year $61 million term loan agreement and two ten-year
capital lease obligations totaling $26.1 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. New
capital lease obligations since December 31, 2008 totaled $39.0 million. These new debt obligations
are guaranteed by the Company and secured by railcar equipment and related leases. See Note 9 for
the form, maturities, and descriptions of the debt. Leasing Group equipment with a net book value
of approximately $1,681.1 million is pledged as collateral for Leasing Group debt. Leasing Group
equipment with a net book value of approximately $105.6 million is pledged as collateral against
operating lease obligations.
In prior years, the Leasing Group completed a series of financing transactions whereby
railcars were sold to one or more separate independent owner trusts (Trusts). The Leasing Group,
through newly formed, wholly owned qualified subsidiaries, leased railcars from the Trusts under
operating leases with terms of 22 years, and subleased the railcars to independent third party
customers under shorter term operating rental agreements. See Note 4 of the December 31, 2008
Consolidated Financial Statements filed on Form 10-K for a detailed explanation of these financing
transactions. Future operating lease obligations of the Leasing Groups subsidiaries as well as
future contractual minimum rental revenues related to these leases due to the Leasing Group are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions) |
Future Operating
Lease Obligations
of Trusts Cars |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
41.7 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
|
$ |
475.0 |
|
|
$ |
672.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Contractual
Minimum Rental
Revenues of Trusts
Cars |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
$ |
69.0 |
|
|
$ |
242.6 |
|
Note 5. Equity Investment
In 2007, the Company and five other equity investors unrelated to the Company or its
subsidiaries formed TRIP Rail Holdings LLC (TRIP Holdings) for the purpose of providing railcar
leasing and management services in North America. TRIP Holdings, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, TRIP Rail Leasing LLC (TRIP Leasing) purchases railcars from the Companys Rail and
Leasing Groups funded by capital contributions from TRIP Holdings equity investors and third-party
debt. The Company agreed to provide 20% of the total of all capital contributions required by TRIP
Holdings up to a total commitment of $49.0 million in exchange for 20% of the equity in TRIP
Holdings. In January 2009, the Company acquired an additional 5% equity ownership in TRIP Holdings
for approximately $9.0 million from another equity investor. As a result, the Company now owns a
25% equity ownership in TRIP Holdings, increasing the Companys total commitment by $12.3 million
to $61.3 million, of which $56.3 million has been paid. The Company receives 25% of the
distributions made from TRIP Holdings to equity investors and has a 25% interest in the net assets
of TRIP Holdings upon a liquidation event. The terms of the Companys 25% equity investment are
identical to the terms of each of the other four equity investors. Railcars purchased from the
Company by TRIP Leasing are required to be purchased at prices comparable with the prices of all
similar railcars sold by the Company during the same period for new railcars and at prices based on
third party appraised values for used railcars. The manager of TRIP Holdings, Trinity Industries
Leasing Company (TILC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Trinity, may be removed without cause as a
result of a majority vote of the non-Company equity members.
In 2008 and 2007, the Company contributed $14.6 million and $21.3 million, respectively, in
capital to TRIP Holdings equal to its 20% pro rata share of total capital received during those
years by TRIP Holdings from the equity investors of
TRIP Holdings. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, Trinity funded $4.9
million and $20.4 million, respectively, pursuant to Trinitys 25% equity ownership obligation,
totaling a $56.3 million investment in TRIP Holdings
12
as of June 30, 2009. Trinitys remaining
equity commitment exposure to TRIP Holdings is $5.0 million through June 2010. The Company also
paid $13.8 million in structuring and placement fees to the principal underwriter in conjunction
with the formation of TRIP Holdings that are expensed on a pro rata basis as railcars are purchased
from the Company. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, $1.5 million and $4.1 million,
respectively, of these structuring and placement fees were expensed, leaving the balance fully
amortized as of June 30, 2009. Such expense has been treated as sales commissions included in
operating costs in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2009, TRIP
Leasing had purchased $1,284.7 million of railcars from the Company. Under TRIP Leasings debt
agreement, the lenders availability period to finance additional railcar purchases ended on June
27, 2009. The Company has no obligation to guarantee performance under the debt agreement,
guarantee any railcar residual values, shield any parties from losses, or guarantee minimum yields.
The Companys carrying value of its investment in TRIP Holdings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Capital contributions |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
Equity in earnings |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Equity in unrealized losses on
derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Deferred broker fees |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing and related gains for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Rail Group: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing |
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
$ |
83.0 |
|
|
$ |
113.0 |
|
|
$ |
229.0 |
|
Gain on sales of railcars to TRIP
Leasing |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
44.8 |
|
Deferral of gain on sales of railcars to
TRIP Leasing based on Trinitys
equity interest |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TILC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing |
|
$ |
51.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
183.8 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
Recognition of previously deferred gain
on sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
Deferral of gain on sales of railcars to
TRIP Leasing based on Trinitys
equity interest |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Administrative fees paid to TILC by TRIP for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2009, were $1.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, and $0.9 million and $2.1 million,
respectively, for the same periods last year.
See Note 5 of the December 31, 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements filed on Form 10-K for
additional information.
Note 6. Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of increases in zinc, natural gas, and
diesel fuel prices and interest rates, as well as to convert a portion of our variable-rate debt to
fixed-rate debt. Additionally, we use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of unfavorable
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use derivatives to lock in fixed interest
rates in anticipation of future debt issuances. Derivative instruments designated as hedges are
accounted for as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133, as amended.
13
Interest rate hedges
In anticipation of a future debt issuance, we entered into interest rate swap transactions
during the fourth quarter of 2006 and during 2007. These instruments, with a notional amount of
$370 million, hedged the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with an
anticipated railcar leasing transaction, which closed in May 2008. These instruments settled during
the second quarter of 2008. The weighted average fixed interest rate under these instruments was
5.34%. These interest rate swaps were accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair
value of the instruments of $24.5 million recorded as a loss in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss (AOCL) through the date the related debt issuance closed with a principal balance of $572.2
million in May 2008. The balance is being amortized over the term of the related debt. On June 30,
2009, the balance remaining in AOCL was $19.8 million. The effect on interest expense for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, was an increase of $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively,
due to amortization of the AOCL balance. The effect on interest expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, was an increase of $2.8 million and $5.0 million, respectively, due to
the ineffective portion of the hedges primarily associated with hedged interest payments that were
never made and amortization of the AOCL balance. It is expected that $3.9 million in losses will be
recognized in earnings during the next twelve months from amortization of the AOCL balance.
In May 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction that is being used to fix the
LIBOR component of the debt issuance which closed in May 2008. The fixed interest rate under this
instrument is 4.126%. The amount recorded for this instrument as of June 30, 2009 in the
consolidated balance sheet was a liability of $30.5 million, with $29.7 million of expense in AOCL.
The effect on interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was an increase of
$5.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, which primarily related to the monthly settlement of
interest. The effect on interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was an
increase of $1.1 million, which primarily related to the monthly settlement of interest.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into interest rate swap transactions with a
notional amount of $200 million that are being used to counter our exposure to changes in the
variable interest rate associated with our warehouse facility. The weighted average fixed interest
rate under these instruments at June 30, 2009 was 1.798%. The amount recorded for these instruments
as of June 30, 2009 in the consolidated balance sheet was a liability of $2.5 million. The effect
on interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was an increase of $0.3
million and $1.4 million, respectively, which included the mark to market valuation on the interest
rate swap transactions and the monthly settlement of interest.
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into interest rate swap transactions in anticipation of a
future debt issuance. These instruments, with a notional amount of $200 million, fixed the interest
rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with a railcar leasing transaction in 2006
and settled at maturity in the first quarter of 2006. The weighted average fixed interest rate
under these instruments was 4.87%. These interest rate swaps were being accounted for as cash flow
hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of $4.5 million in income recorded in AOCL
through the date the related debt issuance closed in May 2006. The balance is being amortized over
the term of the related debt. At June 30, 2009, the balance remaining in AOCL was $3.2 million. The
effect of the amortization on interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2009 was a decrease of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The effect on the same periods
in the prior year was a decrease of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Natural gas and diesel fuel
We continue a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the price of natural gas and
diesel fuel purchases. The intent of the program is to protect our operating profit from adverse
price changes by entering into derivative instruments. For those instruments that do not qualify
for hedge accounting treatment, any changes in their valuation are recorded directly to the
consolidated statement of operations. The amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet for
natural gas hedges was a liability of $0.3 million as of June 30, 2009. The amount recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet for diesel fuel hedges was an asset of $0.2 million and $0.1 million of
income in AOCL. The effect of both derivatives on the consolidated statement of operations was
operating income of $0.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, and operating
expense of $1.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, which includes the mark to
market valuation resulting in a gain of $0.2 million and a loss of $0.2 million for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The effect on the consolidated statement of
operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was operating income of $8.5
million and $9.9 million, respectively, which includes the mark to market valuation resulting in
gains of $7.6 million and $8.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008,
respectively.
14
Foreign Exchange Hedge
During the first and second quarters of 2009, we entered into foreign exchange hedges to
mitigate the impact on operating profit of unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates. These instruments are short term with quarterly maturities and no remaining balance in AOCL.
The effect on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 was expense of $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, included in other, net on the
consolidated statement of operations.
Zinc
In 2008, we continued a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the price of zinc
purchases. The intent of this program was to protect our operating profit from adverse price
changes by entering into derivative instruments. These instruments were short term with monthly
maturities and no remaining balances in AOCL. The effect on the consolidated statement of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was operating income of $0.3 million
and $0.9 million, respectively. We have not entered into any new zinc derivative instruments in
2009.
Note 7. Property, Plant, and Equipment
The following table summarizes the components of property, plant, and equipment as of June 30,
2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as reported) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Corporate/Manufacturing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
38.1 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
418.4 |
|
|
|
401.4 |
|
Machinery and other |
|
|
733.5 |
|
|
|
685.4 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,206.0 |
|
|
|
1,175.6 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(663.2 |
) |
|
|
(620.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
542.8 |
|
|
|
555.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and other |
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
Equipment on lease |
|
|
3,016.0 |
|
|
|
2,973.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,053.7 |
|
|
|
3,010.2 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(266.5 |
) |
|
|
(232.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,787.2 |
|
|
|
2,777.5 |
|
Deferred profit on railcars sold to the Leasing Group |
|
|
(330.8 |
) |
|
|
(342.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,999.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,990.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Warranties
The Company provides warranties against workmanship and materials defects ranging from one to
five years depending on the product. The warranty costs are estimated using a two-step approach.
First, an engineering estimate is made for the cost of all claims that have been filed by a
customer. Second, based on historical claims experience, a cost is accrued for all products still
within a warranty period for which no claims have been filed. The Company provides for the
estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized related to products covered
by warranties and assesses the adequacy of the resulting reserves on a quarterly basis. The changes
in the accruals for warranties for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
22.6 |
|
|
$ |
28.6 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
Warranty costs incurred |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Warranty originations |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Warranty expirations |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Note 9. Debt
The following table summarizes the components of debt as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(adjusted) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Corporate/Manufacturing Recourse: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving commitment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
450.0 |
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
Less: unamortized discount |
|
|
(126.5 |
) |
|
|
(131.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323.5 |
|
|
|
318.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
201.5 |
|
|
|
201.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528.0 |
|
|
|
523.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing Recourse: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan |
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628.0 |
|
|
|
584.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing Non-recourse: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured railcar equipment notes |
|
|
312.6 |
|
|
|
320.0 |
|
Warehouse facility |
|
|
298.6 |
|
|
|
312.7 |
|
Promissory notes |
|
|
544.6 |
|
|
|
557.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155.8 |
|
|
|
1,190.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,783.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,774.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1 as applicable to the Companys 3
7/8% Convertible Subordinated Notes issued June 2006. FSP APB 14-1 requires that the accounting for
these types of instruments reflect their underlying economics by capturing the value of the
conversion option as borrowing costs and recognizing their potential dilutive effects on earnings
per share. FSP APB 14-1 requires retrospective application to all periods presented and does not
grandfather existing instruments.
As a result of adopting FSP APB 14-1, on January 1, 2009, we recorded the following
adjustments to amounts previously reported in our December 31, 2008 Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
income from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debt issuance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
date through |
|
|
|
|
Originally |
|
as of debt |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
issuance date |
|
2008 |
|
Adjusted |
|
|
(In millions) |
Other assets |
|
$ |
297.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
293.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
341.9 |
|
|
$ |
56.6 |
|
|
$ |
(10.2 |
) |
|
$ |
388.3 |
|
Debt |
|
$ |
1,905.9 |
|
|
$ |
(152.6 |
) |
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,774.7 |
|
Capital in
excess of par value |
|
$ |
519.9 |
|
|
$ |
92.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
612.7 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
$ |
1,438.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(11.7 |
) |
|
$ |
1,427.0 |
|
These adjustments, required by FSP APB 14-1, record the effects of (1) reclassifying $152.6
million to capital in excess of par value with an offsetting reduction to debt in the form of
unamortized discount representing the amount of the proceeds received from the issuance of the
Convertible Subordinated Notes attributable to their conversion options; (2) reclassifying $3.2
million in debt origination costs related to the Convertible Subordinated Notes from other assets
to capital in excess of par value; (3) recognizing additional amortization of debt discount and
debt origination costs as an increase to interest expense for the period from the issuance of the
Convertible Subordinated Notes through December 31, 2008; and (4) the corresponding effect of these
adjustments on deferred tax expense and deferred tax liability.
Additionally, interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was increased
by $2.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively, from amounts originally reported to include
amortization of debt discount and debt origination costs
with offsetting tax benefits of $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The effect of
these adjustments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was to decrease basic net income
per share from continuing operations by $0.02 and $0.03,
16
respectively, and to decrease diluted net income per share from continuing operations by $0.01 and
$0.04, respectively. There was no change to the discontinued operations per common share data.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, as adjusted, capital in excess of par value
included $92.8 million related to the estimated value of the Convertible Subordinated Notes
conversion options. Debt discount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet is being amortized
through June 1, 2018 to yield an effective annual interest rate of 8.42% based upon the estimated
market interest rate for comparable non-convertible debt as of the issuance date of the Convertible
Subordinated Notes. Total interest expense recognized on the Subordinated Convertible Notes for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Coupon rate interest |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
Amortized debt discount |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trinitys revolving credit facility requires maintenance of ratios related to interest
coverage for the leasing and manufacturing operations, leverage, and minimum net worth. Interest on
the revolving credit facility is calculated at prime or LIBOR plus 75 basis points. At June 30,
2009, there were no borrowings under our $425 million revolving credit facility that matures on
October 19, 2012. After $90.1 million was considered for letters of credit, $334.9 million was
available under the revolving credit facility.
In May 2009, TILC renewed its railcar leasing warehouse facility through February 2011. Unless
further renewed, this facility will be payable in three equal installments in August 2011, February
2012, and August 2012. The facility, which originally matured in August 2009, was established to
finance railcars owned by TILC. Due to the lower level of demand for railcars at this time and the
Companys resulting need for less financing of this type, the size of the warehouse facility
commitment was reduced from $600 million to $475 million. Advances under this facility bear
interest at a defined index rate plus margin, for an all-in interest rate of 2.94% at June 30,
2009. At June 30, 2009, $298.6 million was outstanding and $176.4 million was available under this
facility.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, TILC entered into a seven-year $61 million term loan
agreement and two ten-year capital lease obligations totaling $26.1 million. These new debt
obligations are guaranteed by the Company and secured by railcar equipment and related leases.
Terms and conditions of other debt, including recourse and non-recourse provisions, are
described in Note 10 of the December 31, 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements filed on Form 10-K.
The remaining principal payments under existing debt agreements as of June 30, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Recourse: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/Manufacturing |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
652.4 |
|
Leasing term loan (Note 4) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
Leasing capital leases (Note 4) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
Non-recourse: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing secured railcar equipment
notes (Note 4) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
244.2 |
|
Leasing warehouse facility (Note 4) |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing promissory notes (Note 4) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
415.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments excluding
termination of warehouse facility |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
1,391.2 |
|
Warehouse facility termination payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
168.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments |
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
|
$ |
58.0 |
|
|
$ |
153.1 |
|
|
$ |
229.0 |
|
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,391.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Note 10. Other, Net
Other, net (income) expense consists of the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Gain on disposition of property, plant, and equipment |
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.5 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange transactions |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Gain on equity investments |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Income Taxes
The change in unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
Additions for tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The additions for the six months ended June 30, 2009, were amounts provided for tax positions
previously taken in foreign jurisdictions and tax positions taken for federal and state income tax
purposes as well as deferred tax liabilities that have been reclassified to uncertain tax
positions.
The reduction for tax positions of prior years for the six months ended June 30, 2009 related
primarily to the completion of state audits in which the Companys tax position was not challenged
by the state and for which the position is now effectively settled and to a federal position that
we believe will be sustained upon audit and therefore is no longer at risk.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits including interest and penalties at June 30,
2009 that would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized was $15.9 million. There is a
reasonable possibility that unrecognized federal and state tax benefits will decrease by June 30,
2010 due to a lapse in the statute of limitations for assessing tax. Amounts subject to a lapse in
statute by June 30, 2010 are $0.1 million. Further, there is a reasonable possibility that the
unrecognized federal tax benefits will decrease by June 30, 2010 due to settlements with taxing
authorities. Amounts expected to settle by June 30, 2010 are $11.1 million.
Trinity accounts for interest expense and penalties related to income tax issues as income tax
expense. Accordingly, interest expense and penalties associated with an uncertain tax position are
included in the income tax provision. The total amount of accrued interest and penalties as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $11.1 million and $10.6 million, respectively.
Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 included $(0.8) million
and $0.5 million, respectively, in interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included $0.5
million and $2.8 million, respectively, in interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions.
We are currently under Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination for the tax years ended
1998 through 2002 and 2004 through 2005, thus our statute remains open from the year ended March
31, 1998, forward. We have agreed upon all issues related to the 1998 through 2002 exam and have
accepted the Tax Courts decision on one of our issues. We are currently waiting for the IRS to
issue their final Revenue Agent Report and thus expect the final settlement to occur within the
next three to six months. We have also concluded the field work for the 2004 through 2005 exam and
were issued a Revenue Agent Report, or 30-Day Letter. Certain issues have been agreed upon by us
and the IRS and certain issues remain unresolved. Accordingly, we have appealed those unresolved
issues to the Appeals Division of the IRS. Additionally, in July 2009, the IRS began their
examination of our 2006 through 2008 tax years. Therefore, the statute related to the 2004 through
2005 and the 2006 through 2008 examinations may remain open for an undeterminable period.
18
In addition, statutes of limitations governing the right of Mexicos tax authorities to audit
the tax returns of our operations in Mexico remain open for the 2002 tax year forward. Our Mexico
subsidiaries are currently under audit for the 2002 and 2003 tax years. Additionally, our Swiss
subsidiary is under audit for the 2006 tax year. We expect these examinations to be completed
within the next three months. Our various European subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that were
sold in 2006, are impacted by various statutes of limitations which are generally open from 2003
forward. An exception to this is our discontinued operations in Romania, which have been audited
through 2004. Generally, states statutes in the United States are open from 2002 forward.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company received income tax refunds of $85.8 million
and expects to receive an additional $5 million tax refund by year end.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company evaluated the ability to utilize its foreign
tax credit carryforwards. We evaluated both positive and negative evidence in determining whether
we believe that we have a more-likely-than-not chance of fully utilizing the foreign tax credits
prior to their expiration. Due to the recent drop in our railcar market and timing of the expected
recovery, the impairment of goodwill within the Rail Group, and the relative short remaining
carryforward period of some of our older foreign tax credits, we have established a valuation
allowance of $6.3 million against tax credits generated prior to 2007. We do not have any foreign
tax credit carryover generated in 2007 and we believe the ten year carryover period and our current
taxable structure allow us to conclude that it is likely that we will be able to fully utilize the
most recently generated credits.
Note 12. Employee Retirement Plans
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
Interest |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Amortization and deferral |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Profit sharing |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company amended its Supplemental Retirement Plan (the
Supplemental Plan) to reduce future retirement plan costs. This amendment provides that all
benefit accruals under the Supplemental Plan shall cease effective March 31, 2009, and the
Supplemental Plan will be frozen as of that date. In addition, the Company amended the Trinity
Industries, Inc. Standard Pension Plan (the Pension Plan). This amendment was designed to reduce
future pension costs and provides that, effective March 31, 2009, all future benefit accruals under
the Pension Plan will automatically cease for all participants, and the accrued benefits under the
Pension Plan will be determined and frozen as of
that date. Accordingly, as a result of these amendments, accrued pension liability was reduced by
$44.1 million with an offsetting reduction in funded status of pension liability included in AOCL.
Trinity contributed $4.2 million and $12.7 million to the Companys defined benefit pension
plans for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Trinity contributed
$4.2 million and $7.7 million to the Companys defined benefit pension plans for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Total contributions to the Companys pension plans
in 2009 are expected to be approximately $19.1 million.
19
Note 13. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive
net income (loss) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(209.4 |
) |
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
(175.5 |
) |
|
$ |
148.0 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax expense of
$, $, $, and $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Change in funded status of pension liability, net of tax
expense of $, $, $16.4, and $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments,
net of tax expense (benefit) of $8.4, $6.1, $10.8, and $(0.8) |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Other changes, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(0.1), $0.4,
$(0.6), and $0.4 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(190.5 |
) |
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
$ |
(125.2 |
) |
|
$ |
147.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as reported) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefit of $(0.2) and $(0.1) |
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments, net of tax benefit of
$(17.1) and $(28.0) |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
(56.8 |
) |
Funded status of pension liability, net of tax benefit of $(34.5) and $(50.9) |
|
|
(58.7 |
) |
|
|
(86.4 |
) |
Other changes, net of tax benefit of $(1.2) and $(0.6) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(111.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(161.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation totaled approximately $3.6 million and $7.5 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Stock-based compensation totaled approximately $5.1
million and $10.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Note 15. Net Income Per Common Share
On January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1 requiring that unvested
share-based payment awards containing non-forfeitable rights to dividends be considered
participating securities and included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the
two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 requires that, upon adoption, all prior period earnings per share
data presented be adjusted retrospectively. The effect of adopting FSP EITF 03-6-1 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008 was to decrease basic net income per common share from
continuing operations by $0.04 and $0.06, respectively. The effect of adopting FSP EITF 03-6-1 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was to decrease diluted net income per common share
from continuing operations by $0.02 and $0.03, respectively. There was no change to the
discontinued operations per common share data.
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income remaining after
allocation to unvested restricted shares by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Except when the effect would be anti-dilutive, the calculation of
diluted net income per common share includes the net impact of unvested restricted shares and
shares that could be issued under outstanding stock options. Total weighted average restricted
shares and stock options having an antidilutive effect on diluted earnings per share were 4.0
million shares and 3.9 million shares for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009,
respectively. Total weighted average restricted shares and stock options having an antidilutive
effect on diluted earnings per share were 2.6 million shares and 2.5 million shares for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
20
The computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(209.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted share participation |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
basic |
|
|
(209.8 |
) |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.75 |
) |
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
diluted* |
|
$ |
(209.8 |
) |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.75 |
) |
|
$ |
81.5 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to unvested restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes basic |
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes diluted |
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(175.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
148.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted share participation |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
basic |
|
|
(176.0 |
) |
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
diluted* |
|
$ |
(176.0 |
) |
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2.30 |
) |
|
$ |
143.8 |
|
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to unvested restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes basic |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
taxes diluted |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Diluted loss per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 is based only on
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, as the inclusion of
stock options and restricted shares would have been antidilutive. |
21
Note 16. Contingencies
Barge Litigation
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Trinity Marine Products, Inc., were co-defendants
in a class-action lawsuit filed in April 2003 entitled Waxler Transportation Company, Inc. v.
Trinity Marine Products, Inc., et al. A settlement of this case was approved by the court and
became final February 13, 2008. The Court Appointed Disbursing Agent (CADA) prepared an
Allocation Plan and Distribution Plan for the disbursement of settlement compensation that was
approved by the court on November 14, 2008. As of June 30, 2009, based on instructions from the
CADA to the settlement funds escrow agent, the Company had received $3.6 million in refunds of
unclaimed settlement funds.
Other Litigation and Contingencies
The Company is involved in other claims and lawsuits incidental to our business. Based on
information currently available, it is managements opinion that the ultimate outcome of all
current litigation and other claims, including settlements, in the aggregate will not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys overall financial condition for purposes of financial
reporting. However, resolution of certain claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have
a significant impact on the operating results of the reporting period in which such resolution
occurs.
We are subject to Federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relating to the
environment and the workplace. We have reserved $6.9 million to cover our probable and estimable
liabilities with respect to the investigations, assessments, and remedial responses to such
matters, taking into account currently available information and our contractual rights to
indemnification and recourse to third parties. However, estimates of liability arising from future
proceedings, assessments, or remediation are inherently imprecise. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that we will not become involved in future litigation or other proceedings involving the
environment and the workplace or, if we are found to be responsible or liable in any such
litigation or proceeding, that such costs would not be material to the Company. Other than with
respect to the foregoing, we believe that we are currently in substantial compliance with
environmental and workplace laws and regulations.
22
Note 17. Financial Statements for Guarantors of the Senior Debt
The Companys senior debt and certain operating leases are fully and unconditionally and
jointly and severally guaranteed by certain of Trinitys wholly owned subsidiaries: Transit Mix
Concrete & Materials Company, Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity Marine Products, Inc.,
Trinity Rail Group, LLC, Trinity North American Freight Car, Inc., Trinity Tank Car, Inc., and
Trinity Parts & Components, LLC. No other subsidiaries guarantee the senior debt. As of June 30,
2009, assets held by the non-guarantor subsidiaries include $122.6 million of restricted assets
that are not available for distribution to Trinity Industries, Inc. (Parent), $1,681.1 million of
equipment securing certain debt, $105.6 million of equipment securing certain lease obligations
held by the non-guarantor subsidiaries, and $236.9 million of assets located in foreign locations.
As of December 31, 2008, assets held by the non-guarantor subsidiaries include $120.2 million of
restricted assets that are not available for distribution to the Parent, $1,546.5 million of
equipment securing certain debt, $107.2 million of equipment securing certain lease obligations
held by the non-guarantor subsidiaries, and $266.9 million of assets located in foreign locations.
Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
403.7 |
|
|
$ |
359.0 |
|
|
$ |
(46.6 |
) |
|
$ |
716.1 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
286.6 |
|
|
|
333.4 |
|
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
586.1 |
|
Selling, engineering, and
administrative expenses |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.3 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
634.4 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
958.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
(230.7 |
) |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(242.3 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
193.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
(189.3 |
) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(214.2 |
) |
|
|
(234.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
|
(266.3 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(65.1 |
) |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(209.4 |
) |
|
|
(169.4 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
|
(209.4 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of benefit for income taxes of $(0.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(209.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(169.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.9 |
) |
|
$ |
189.3 |
|
|
$ |
(209.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
928.7 |
|
|
$ |
702.4 |
|
|
$ |
(121.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1,509.6 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
725.4 |
|
|
|
618.7 |
|
|
|
(121.5 |
) |
|
|
1,247.4 |
|
Selling, engineering, and
administrative expenses |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
1,096.2 |
|
|
|
653.7 |
|
|
|
(121.5 |
) |
|
|
1,668.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
(40.2 |
) |
|
|
(167.5 |
) |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159.0 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
146.6 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
(132.8 |
) |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(186.8 |
) |
|
|
(169.9 |
) |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
(211.1 |
) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(175.5 |
) |
|
|
(124.7 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
(175.4 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net
of benefit for income taxes of $(0.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(175.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(124.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
|
$ |
132.8 |
|
|
$ |
(175.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 (adjusted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
594.9 |
|
|
$ |
491.7 |
|
|
$ |
(144.8 |
) |
|
$ |
945.5 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
465.9 |
|
|
|
385.4 |
|
|
|
(144.8 |
) |
|
|
730.5 |
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
496.1 |
|
|
|
407.9 |
|
|
|
(144.8 |
) |
|
|
795.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(106.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes |
|
|
73.7 |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
(109.3 |
) |
|
|
136.2 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
84.2 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
(109.3 |
) |
|
|
84.2 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
benefit for income taxes of $(0.0) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
65.8 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
$ |
(109.3 |
) |
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 (adjusted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,189.8 |
|
|
$ |
928.4 |
|
|
$ |
(280.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,844.4 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
924.2 |
|
|
|
740.1 |
|
|
|
(280.1 |
) |
|
|
1,447.0 |
|
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
983.4 |
|
|
|
784.3 |
|
|
|
(280.1 |
) |
|
|
1,568.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
(74.3 |
) |
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
144.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276.2 |
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(198.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes |
|
|
124.2 |
|
|
|
209.9 |
|
|
|
115.3 |
|
|
|
(206.8 |
) |
|
|
242.6 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
74.6 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
148.0 |
|
|
|
135.3 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
|
|
(206.8 |
) |
|
|
148.3 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of
benefit for income taxes of ($0.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
148.0 |
|
|
$ |
135.3 |
|
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
|
$ |
(206.8 |
) |
|
$ |
148.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
415.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
440.9 |
|
Receivables, net of allowance |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
144.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215.2 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
205.9 |
|
|
|
163.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369.3 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
967.3 |
|
|
|
2,013.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,999.2 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries/intercompany receivable
(payable), net |
|
|
2,043.1 |
|
|
|
439.4 |
|
|
|
551.4 |
|
|
|
(3,033.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other assets |
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
173.8 |
|
|
|
241.1 |
|
|
|
(33.7 |
) |
|
|
487.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,601.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,862.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,134.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3,067.6 |
) |
|
$ |
4,530.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
175.3 |
|
|
$ |
118.7 |
|
|
$ |
171.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
465.1 |
|
Debt |
|
|
525.0 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
1,155.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,783.8 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
376.5 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
(33.7 |
) |
|
|
368.7 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,766.8 |
|
|
|
1,258.5 |
|
|
|
1,775.4 |
|
|
|
(3,033.9 |
) |
|
|
1,766.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,601.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,862.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,134.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3,067.6 |
) |
|
$ |
4,530.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Balance Sheet
December 31, 2008
(adjusted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
139.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161.8 |
|
Receivables, net of allowance |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
160.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251.3 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
407.7 |
|
|
|
203.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611.8 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
957.7 |
|
|
|
2,012.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990.6 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries/
intercompany receivable (payable), net |
|
|
2,399.5 |
|
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
|
497.2 |
|
|
|
(3,114.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other assets |
|
|
215.1 |
|
|
|
438.4 |
|
|
|
285.4 |
|
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
|
|
797.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,874.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,113.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,179.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3,255.7 |
) |
|
$ |
4,911.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
269.0 |
|
|
$ |
184.0 |
|
|
$ |
246.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
699.4 |
|
Debt |
|
|
520.3 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
1,190.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,774.7 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
456.8 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
(141.5 |
) |
|
|
388.3 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,912.3 |
|
|
|
1,404.2 |
|
|
|
1,710.0 |
|
|
|
(3,114.2 |
) |
|
|
1,912.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,874.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,113.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,179.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3,255.7 |
) |
|
$ |
4,911.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net cash provided (required) by operating
activities |
|
$ |
290.0 |
|
|
$ |
(23.7 |
) |
|
$ |
80.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
347.0 |
|
Net cash provided (required) by investing
activities |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
(46.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Net cash provided (required) by financing
activities |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
275.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279.1 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
139.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
415.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
440.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Combined Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net cash provided (required) by operating activities |
|
$ |
(46.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.6 |
) |
|
$ |
102.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
Net cash provided (required) by investing activities |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
(448.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399.9 |
) |
Net cash provided (required) by financing activities |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
329.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(62.7 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79.6 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
238.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
175.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
210.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated
financial statements of Trinity Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries
(Trinity, Company, we, or
our) and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this document.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), requires goodwill to be tested for impairment annually, or on an interim
basis, whenever events or circumstances change, indicating that the carrying amount of the asset
might be impaired. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process requiring the comparison of
the reporting units estimated fair value with the carrying amount of its net assets. Step two of
the impairment test is necessary to determine the amount of goodwill impairment to be recorded when
the reporting units recorded net assets exceed its fair value. We perform this test for our five
principal business segments, considered to be reporting units under the provisions of SFAS 142:
(1) the Rail Group, (2) the Construction Products Group, (3) the Inland Barge Group, (4) the Energy
Equipment Group, and (5) the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group.
During
the second quarter of 2009, there was a significant decline in new orders for railcars and continued weakening
demand for products in the Rail Group as well as a change in the
average estimated railcar deliveries from independent third party
research firms. Additionally, the significant number of idled railcars
in the North American fleet resulted in the creation of new internal
sales estimates by railcar type. Based on this information, we concluded that
indications of impairment existed with respect to the Rail Group which required an interim goodwill
impairment analysis and, accordingly, we performed such a test as of June 30, 2009. The table below
is an average of the estimates of approximate industry railcar deliveries for the next five years
from two independent third party research firms, Global Insight, Inc. and Economic Planning
Associates, Inc.
Average Estimated Railcar Deliveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 2009 |
|
As of May 2009 |
|
Percent Change |
2009 |
|
|
28,300 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
)% |
2010 |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
15,100 |
|
|
|
(36.3 |
)% |
2011 |
|
|
41,550 |
|
|
|
29,150 |
|
|
|
(29.8 |
)% |
2012 |
|
|
56,050 |
|
|
|
48,200 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
)% |
2013 |
|
|
62,550 |
|
|
|
59,750 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
Our estimate of the Rail Groups fair value (considered to be a level three fair value
measurement) utilized an income approach based on the anticipated future discounted cash flows of
the Rail Group, requiring significant estimates and judgments related to future revenues and
operating profits, exit multiples, tax rates and consequences, and discount rates based upon
market-based capital costs. Because the estimated fair value of the Rail Group was less than the
carrying amount of its net assets, we performed step two of our goodwill impairment analysis as
required by SFAS 142, by estimating the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of the Rail
Group in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations and SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. The result of our impairment analysis indicated that the remaining implied
goodwill amounted to $122.5 million for our Rail Group as of June 30, 2009 and, consequently, we
recorded an impairment charge of $325.0 million during the second quarter of 2009. The change in
our estimate of the Rail Groups enterprise value from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 was
driven by economic indicators, including third-party studies that are predicting that the decline
in the railcar industry is likely to extend longer than was previously expected. In managements
opinion, no interim impairment tests were necessary for our remaining business segments as there
has not been a significant change in market conditions for these segments since the annual
impairment test.
Additionally, we performed an interim test for recoverability of the carrying value of our
Rail Group long-lived assets based on cash flow estimates consistent with those used in the
goodwill impairment test. The carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used is considered
impaired only when their carrying value is not recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows
and the fair value of the assets is less than
their carrying value. We determined that there was no impairment of the recoverability of the
Rail Groups long-lived assets as the Rail Groups estimated undiscounted future cash flows
exceeded the carrying value of its long-lived assets.
Given the current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the potential impact on
our businesses, there can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions regarding the duration
of the ongoing economic downturn, or the period or strength of recovery, made for the purposes of
the long-lived asset and goodwill impairment tests during the second quarter of 2009 will prove to
be accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows are not
achieved, it is possible that additional impairments of remaining goodwill and long-lived assets
may be required.
26
In 2007, Trinity Industries Inc. purchased 20% of the
equity in newly-formed TRIP Rail Holdings LLC (TRIP
Holdings). TRIP Holdings and its subsidiary, TRIP Rail Leasing
LLC (TRIP Leasing)
provide railcar leasing and management services in North America. Railcars are purchased from
Trinity by TRIP Leasing.
In January 2009, the Company acquired an additional 5% equity ownership in TRIP Holdings for
approximately $9.0 million from another equity investor. As a result, the Company now owns a 25%
equity ownership in TRIP Holdings, increasing the Companys total commitment by $12.3 million to
$61.3 million, of which $56.3 million has been paid. Trinitys remaining equity commitment exposure
to TRIP Holdings is $5.0 million through June 2010. Trinitys carrying value of its investment in
TRIP Holdings follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Capital contributions |
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
Equity in earnings |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Equity in unrealized losses on
derivative financial instruments |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
Distributions |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Deferred broker fees |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million common stock
repurchase program allowing for repurchases through December 31, 2009. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, 813,028 and 471,100 shares were repurchased under this program at a cost of
approximately $6.3 million and $12.2 million, respectively. No shares were repurchased under this
program for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Since the inception of this program
through June 30, 2009, the Company has repurchased a total of 3,532,728 shares at a cost of
approximately $67.5 million.
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No.
APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of
certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion to separately
account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entitys
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest expense is recognized in subsequent periods. The
effective date of FSP APB 14-1 is for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and does not permit earlier application. The
pronouncement requires that all periods presented be adjusted. The Company adopted the provisions
of FSP APB 14-1 as of January 1, 2009 and has accordingly adjusted amounts previously reported with
respect to Debt, Other assets, Capital in excess of par value, Deferred income taxes and Interest
expense. See Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further
explanation of the effects of implementing this pronouncement as it applies to our Convertible
Subordinated Notes.
In May 2009, Trinity Industries Leasing Company (TILC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Trinity, renewed its railcar leasing warehouse facility through February 2011. This facility, which
was set to mature in August 2009, was established to finance railcars owned by TILC. Additionally,
TILC completed several other financings during the second quarter
totaling $87.1 million. See
Financing Activities.
The economic and financial crisis experienced by the United States economy during 2008 and
into 2009 has impacted our businesses. New orders for railcars and barges continued to drop
significantly in the first six months of 2009 as the transportation industry saw a significant
decline in the shipment of freight. The 2009 outlook for the transportation industry is for a
continued significant downturn. Orders for structural wind towers have been slow since mid-2008
when green energy companies experienced tightened credit markets coupled with lower prices for
electricity and natural gas sales. The slowdown in the residential and commercial construction
markets impacted our Construction Products Group as well. We continually assess our manufacturing
capacity and take steps to align our production capacity with demand. As a result of our
assessment, we idled a significant amount of our railcar production capacity and one structural
wind tower production facility during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
27
Overall Summary for Continuing Operations
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
159.4 |
|
|
$ |
143.9 |
|
|
$ |
303.3 |
|
|
$ |
334.9 |
|
|
$ |
255.7 |
|
|
$ |
590.6 |
|
|
|
(48.6 |
)% |
Construction Products Group |
|
|
152.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
153.3 |
|
|
|
214.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
219.2 |
|
|
|
(30.1 |
) |
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
150.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.9 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
132.6 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
134.4 |
|
|
|
154.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
157.3 |
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group |
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
All Other |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
(43.5 |
) |
Eliminations lease subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138.8 |
) |
|
|
(138.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252.6 |
) |
|
|
(252.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Eliminations other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
716.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
716.1 |
|
|
$ |
945.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
945.5 |
|
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
External |
|
|
Intersegment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
322.1 |
|
|
$ |
265.1 |
|
|
$ |
587.2 |
|
|
$ |
682.6 |
|
|
$ |
475.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,158.4 |
|
|
|
(49.3 |
)% |
Construction Products Group |
|
|
273.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
276.8 |
|
|
|
379.3 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
388.5 |
|
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
293.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293.7 |
|
|
|
288.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
259.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
262.9 |
|
|
|
280.5 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
286.8 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group |
|
|
355.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355.9 |
|
|
|
206.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.2 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
All Other |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
Eliminations lease subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255.3 |
) |
|
|
(255.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(469.3 |
) |
|
|
(469.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Eliminations other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51.5 |
) |
|
|
(51.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
1,509.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,509.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,844.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,844.4 |
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 decreased due to fewer
railcar sales and lower pricing from certain segments resulting from lower material costs and
competitive pricing pressures.
Operating Profit (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Rail Group |
|
$ |
(328.7 |
) |
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
$ |
(334.5 |
) |
|
$ |
149.6 |
|
Construction Products Group |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
Inland Barge Group |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
69.2 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
Energy Equipment Group |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
All Other |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
Eliminations lease subsidiary |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
(54.3 |
) |
Eliminations other |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Total |
|
$ |
(242.3 |
) |
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
|
$ |
(159.0 |
) |
|
$ |
276.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 decreased as a result
of a goodwill impairment charge of $325 million and lower revenues coupled with reduced pricing
driven by lower material costs and highly competitive markets.
Other Income and Expense. Interest expense, net of interest income, was $28.5 million and
$57.2 million, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to
$26.0 million and $46.9 million (as adjusted see
Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements), respectively, for the same periods
last year. Interest income decreased $0.7 million over the same quarter last year and $2.7 million
over the same six month period last year as a result of lower interest rates more than offsetting
the effect of an increase in cash available for investment. Interest expense increased $1.8 million
and $7.6 million, respectively, over the same periods last year due to an increase in debt levels,
including $544.6 million of promissory notes for the Leasing
Group entered into in May 2008, and expense related to the
ineffective portion of interest rate hedges. The decrease in Other, net for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 was primarily due to gains recognized on property dispositions in 2008.
28
Income Taxes. The effective tax rates for continuing operations for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009 were 21.4% and 16.9%, respectively, and varied from the statutory rate
of 35.0% due primarily to the goodwill
impairment charge not being fully deductible for income tax purposes, the recording of a $6.3
million valuation reserve related to the utilization of foreign tax credits, state income taxes and
discrete adjustments related to foreign and state taxes. The prior year effective tax rates for
continuing operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 were 38.2% and 38.9%,
respectively, and varied from the statutory rate of 35.0% due primarily to state income taxes and
discrete adjustments related to foreign and state taxes.
Rail Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
Change |
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rail |
|
$ |
271.1 |
|
|
$ |
545.6 |
|
|
|
(50.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
521.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,071.5 |
|
|
|
(51.3 |
)% |
Components |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
(28.4 |
) |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
86.9 |
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
303.3 |
|
|
$ |
590.6 |
|
|
|
(48.6 |
) |
|
$ |
587.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,158.4 |
|
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
$ |
(328.7 |
) |
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(334.5 |
) |
|
$ |
149.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) margin |
|
|
(108.4 |
)% |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57.0 |
)% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Railcar shipments decreased 53% to approximately 3,080 and 51% to approximately 6,130 during
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same periods in 2008. As of
June 30, 2009, our Rail Group backlog consisted of approximately 3,780 railcars as compared to
approximately 28,680 railcars as of June 30, 2008. The railcar backlog dollar value as of June 30,
2009 and June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External Customers |
|
$ |
162.1 |
|
|
$ |
748.8 |
|
TRIP Leasing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237.1 |
|
Leasing Group |
|
|
163.8 |
|
|
|
1,384.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
325.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,370.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of the backlog dedicated to the Leasing Group is supported by lease
agreements with external customers. The final amount dedicated to the Leasing Group may vary by the
time of delivery. Results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 included $75.0
million and $113.0 million, respectively, in railcars sold to TRIP Leasing, that resulted in a gain
of $6.2 million and $11.2 million, respectively, of which $1.6 million and $2.8 million,
respectively, in profit was deferred based on our 25% equity interest. Results for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2008 included $83.0 million and $229.0 million, respectively, in
railcars sold to TRIP Leasing, that resulted in a gain of $19.2 million and $44.8 million,
respectively, of which $3.8 million and $8.9 million, respectively, in profit was deferred based on
our 20% equity interest. See Note 5 Equity Investment of the Consolidated Financial Statements for
information about TRIP Leasing.
Operating profit for the Rail Group decreased $401.1 million and $484.1 million, respectively,
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods last year.
This decrease was primarily due to a $325 million goodwill impairment charge during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009 (see Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements). Additionally, a significantly reduced volume of railcars were
delivered during the period amid a lower pricing and unit demand environment.
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, railcar shipments included sales to the Leasing Group
of $138.8 million compared to $252.6 million in the comparable period in 2008 with a deferred
profit of $8.8 million compared to $23.1 million for the same period in 2008. In the six months
ended June 30, 2009, railcar shipments included sales to the Leasing Group of $255.3 million
compared to $469.3 million in the comparable period in 2008 with a deferred profit of $17.7 million
compared to $54.3 million for the same period in 2008. Sales to the Leasing Group and related
profits are included in the operating results of the Rail Group but eliminated in consolidation.
29
Construction Products Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete and Aggregates |
|
$ |
85.9 |
|
|
$ |
126.3 |
|
|
|
(32.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
163.8 |
|
|
$ |
230.8 |
|
|
|
(29.0 |
)% |
Highway Products |
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
Other |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
(70.6 |
) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
(68.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
153.3 |
|
|
$ |
219.2 |
|
|
|
(30.1 |
) |
|
$ |
276.8 |
|
|
$ |
388.5 |
|
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the same periods in 2008 was primarily attributable to the overall decline in the economic
conditions related to the markets served by this segment including a reduction in state funding of
highway construction. Operating profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the same periods in 2008 decreased as a result of lower volumes. Additionally the Construction
Products Group recorded a $1.1 million write down of surplus inventory quantities at June 30, 2009
resulting in a total inventory write-down of $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Inland Barge Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Percent Change |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Percent Change |
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
136.7 |
|
|
$ |
150.9 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
293.7 |
|
|
$ |
288.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69.2 |
|
|
$ |
53.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased while operating profit increased for the three month period ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period in the prior year due to fewer barges shipped offset by lower
operating expenses. Revenues and operating profit increased for the six month period ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same period in the prior year due to a change in the mix of barges sold.
Operating profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 included the refund of $0.7
million and $1.6 million, respectively, in unclaimed settlement funds related to a legal settlement
and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 included the refund of $2.0 million in unclaimed
settlement funds related to the same settlement. As of June 30, 2009, the backlog for the Inland
Barge Group was approximately $349.5 million compared to approximately $754.9 million as of June
30, 2008.
Energy Equipment Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structural wind towers |
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
|
$ |
106.4 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
192.1 |
|
|
$ |
190.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
134.4 |
|
|
$ |
157.3 |
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
$ |
262.9 |
|
|
$ |
286.8 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Revenues decreased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same periods in 2008 due to overall lower volumes partially offset by change in the mix of
structural wind towers sold. Operating profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same periods in 2008 remained relatively unchanged as the effects of lower volumes
were offset by a change in the sales mix and lower operating costs both related to structural wind
towers. As of June 30, 2009, the backlog for structural wind towers was approximately $1.2 billion
compared to approximately $1.5 billion as of June 30, 2008.
30
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent Change |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Percent Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and management |
|
$ |
79.9 |
|
|
$ |
77.4 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
$ |
165.6 |
|
|
$ |
147.5 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Sales of cars from the lease fleet |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
495.6 |
|
|
|
190.3 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
133.5 |
|
|
$ |
86.4 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
$ |
355.9 |
|
|
$ |
206.2 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and management |
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67.6 |
|
|
$ |
60.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of cars from the lease fleet |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87.9 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit margin: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing and management |
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
|
44.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Sales of cars from the lease fleet |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit margin |
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet utilization |
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the same periods last year due to increased sales from the lease fleet as well as increased rental
revenues related to additions to the lease fleet.
Operating profit for the three month period ended June 30, 2009 decreased compared to the same
period in 2008 due to lower fleet utilization partially offset by increased rental proceeds from
fleet additions. Operating profit increased for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the same period last year due primarily to increased rental proceeds from fleet additions and
increased sales from the lease fleet. Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
included $51.7 million and $183.8 million, respectively, in sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing that
resulted in the recognition of previously deferred gains of $5.5 million and $30.3 million,
respectively, of which $1.4 million and $7.6 million, respectively, were deferred based on our 25%
equity interest. Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 included $8.3 million and
$46.2 million, respectively, in sales of railcars to TRIP Leasing that resulted in the recognition
of previously deferred gains of $1.8 million and $9.0 million, respectively, of which $0.4 million
and $1.8 million, respectively, were deferred based on our 20% equity interest. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, operating profit included $0.6 million and $2.3 million,
respectively, in structuring and placement fees related to TRIP Holdings that were expensed. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, operating profit included $0.1 million and $0.5
million, respectively, in structuring and placement fees related to TRIP Holdings that were
expensed. See Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about TRIP Leasing.
To fund the continued expansion of its lease fleet to meet market demand, the Leasing Group
generally uses its non-recourse $475 million warehouse facility, which was recently reduced from
$600 million due to the lower level of demand for railcars at this time and the Companys resulting
need for less financing of this type, or excess cash to provide initial financing for a portion of
the purchase price of the railcars. See Financing Activities.
As of June 30, 2009, the Leasing Groups lease fleet of approximately 48,630 owned or leased
railcars had an average age of 4.9 years and an average remaining lease term of 3.9 years.
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Percent Change |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Percent Change |
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
|
(43.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
36.6 |
|
|
|
(32.2 |
)% |
Operating profit (loss) |
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 over the same
periods last year was primarily due to a decrease in intersegment sales by our transportation
company. The decrease in operating profit for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009
was primarily due to the decrease in intersegment sales and a decline in the market valuation of
commodity hedges that are required to be marked to market.
31
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $347.0 million compared to $24.7 million of net cash
provided by operating activities of continuing operations for the same period in 2008.
Accounts receivables at June 30, 2009 as compared to the accounts receivables balance at
December 31, 2008 decreased by $36.1 million or approximately 14% due to lower shipping volumes and
the collection of foreign tax receivables. Income tax receivable declined primarily due to the
receipt of $85.8 million in income tax refunds. Raw materials inventory at June 30, 2009 decreased
by $177.1 million or approximately 50% since December 31, 2008 primarily attributable to lower
production. Finished goods inventory decreased by $32.1 million since December 31, 2008 primarily
due to lower finished goods inventory in our Rail Group. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
decreased from December 31, 2008 by $234.3 million primarily due to lower production activity. We
continually review reserves related to bad debt as well as the adequacy of lower of cost or market
valuations related to accounts receivable and inventory.
Investing Activities. Net cash required by investing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2009 was $14.2 million compared to $399.9 million for the same period last year. Capital
expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $275.4 million, of which $243.8 million
were for additions to the lease fleet. This compares to $477.8 million of capital expenditures for
the same period last year, of which $426.1 million were for additions to the lease fleet. Proceeds
from the sale of property, plant, and equipment and other assets were $261.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 composed primarily of railcar sales from the lease fleet, which included
$183.8 million to TRIP Leasing. This compares to $77.9 million for the same period in 2008 composed
primarily of railcar sales from the lease fleet, which included $46.2 million to TRIP Leasing.
Financing Activities. Net cash required by financing activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $53.7 million compared to $294.8 million of cash provided by financing activities
for the same period in 2008. In February 2009, we repaid in full our Leasing Groups equipment
trust certificates in the amount of $61.4 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, TILC
entered into a seven-year $61 million term loan agreement and two ten-year capital lease
obligations totaling $26.1 million for a total of $39 million in new capital lease obligations
since the beginning of the year. These new debt obligations are guaranteed by the Company and
secured by railcar equipment and related leases. We intend to use our cash and credit facilities to
fund the operations, expansions, and growth initiatives of the Company.
At June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under our $425 million revolving credit facility
that matures on October 19, 2012. Interest on the revolving credit facility is calculated at prime
or LIBOR plus 75 basis points. After $90.1 million was considered for letters of credit, $334.9
million was available under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2009.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP
APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of certain convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that will reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest expense is
recognized in subsequent periods. The effective date of FSP APB 14-1 is for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and does not permit
earlier application. The pronouncement requires that all periods presented be adjusted. The Company
adopted the provisions of FSP APB 14-1 as of January 1, 2009 and has accordingly adjusted amounts
previously reported with respect to Debt, Other assets, Capital in excess of par value, Deferred
income taxes and Interest expense. See Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
further explanation of the effects of implementing this pronouncement as it applies to our
Convertible Subordinated Notes.
In May 2009, TILC renewed its railcar leasing warehouse facility through February 2011. Unless
renewed, this facility will be payable in three equal installments in August 2011, February 2012,
and August 2012. The facility, which originally matured in August 2009, was established to finance
railcars owned by TILC. Due to the lower level of demand for railcars at this time and the
Companys resulting need for less financing of this type, the size of the warehouse facility
commitment was reduced from $600 million to $475 million. Advances under this facility bear
interest at a defined index rate plus margin, for an all-in interest rate of 2.94% at June 30,
2009. At June 30, 2009, $298.6 million was outstanding and $176.4 million was available under this
facility.
32
On December 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million common stock
repurchase program allowing for repurchases through December 31, 2009. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, 813,028 and 471,100 shares were repurchased under this program at a cost of
approximately $6.3 million and $12.2 million, respectively. No shares were repurchased under this
program for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Since the inception of this program
through June 30, 2009, the Company has repurchased a total of 3,532,728 shares at a cost of
approximately $67.5 million.
The economic and financial crisis experienced by the United States economy during 2008 and
into 2009 has impacted our businesses. New orders for railcars and barges continued to drop
significantly in the first six months of 2009 as the transportation industry saw a significant
decline in the shipment of freight. The 2009 outlook for the transportation industry is for a
continued significant downturn. Orders for structural wind towers have been slow since mid-2008
when green energy companies experienced tightened credit markets coupled with lower prices for
electricity and natural gas sales. The slowdown in the residential and commercial construction
markets impacted our Construction Products Group as well. We continually assess our manufacturing
capacity and take steps to align our production capacity with demand. As a result of our
assessment, we idled a significant amount of our railcar production capacity and one structural
wind tower production facility during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
Equity Investment
See Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about the equity
investment.
Future Operating Requirements
We expect to finance future operating requirements with cash flows from operations, and
depending on market conditions, long-term and short-term debt, and equity. Debt instruments that
the Company has utilized include its revolving credit facility, the warehouse facility, senior
notes, convertible subordinated notes, asset-backed securities, and sale/leaseback transactions.
The Company has also issued equity at various times. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $334.9
million available under its revolving credit facility and $176.4 million available under its
warehouse facility. Despite the volatile conditions in both the credit and stock markets, the
Company believes it has access to adequate capital resources to fund operating requirements and is
active in the credit markets.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
See Note 4 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about off balance sheet
arrangements.
Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of increases in zinc, natural gas, and
diesel fuel prices and interest rates, as well as to convert a portion of our variable-rate debt to
fixed-rate debt. Additionally, we use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of unfavorable
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use derivatives to lock in fixed interest
rates in anticipation of future debt issuances. Derivative instruments designated as hedges are
accounted for as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133, as amended.
Interest rate hedges
In anticipation of a future debt issuance, we entered into interest rate swap transactions
during the fourth quarter of 2006 and during 2007. These instruments, with a notional amount of
$370 million, hedged the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with an
anticipated railcar leasing transaction, which closed in May 2008. These instruments settled during
the second quarter of 2008. The weighted average fixed interest rate under these instruments was
5.34%. These interest rate swaps were accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair
value of the instruments of $24.5 million recorded as a loss in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss (AOCL) through the date the related debt issuance closed with a principal balance of $572.2
million in May 2008. The balance is being amortized over the term of the related debt. On June 30,
2009, the balance remaining in AOCL was $19.8 million. The effect on interest expense for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, was an increase of $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively,
due to amortization of the AOCL balance. The effect on interest expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, was an increase of $2.8 million and $5.0 million, respectively, due to
the ineffective portion of the hedges primarily associated with hedged interest payments that were
never made and amortization of the AOCL balance. It is expected that $3.9 million in losses will be
recognized in earnings during the next twelve months from amortization of the AOCL balance.
33
In May 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction that is being used to fix the
LIBOR component of the debt issuance which closed in May 2008. The fixed interest rate under this
instrument is 4.126%. The amount recorded for this instrument as of June 30, 2009 in the
consolidated balance sheet was a liability of $30.5 million, with $29.7 million of expense in AOCL.
The effect on interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was an increase of
$5.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively, which primarily related to the monthly settlement of
interest. The effect on interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was an
increase of $1.1 million, which primarily related to the monthly settlement of interest.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we entered into interest rate swap transactions with a
notional amount of $200 million that are being used to counter our exposure to changes in the
variable interest rate associated with our warehouse facility. The weighted average fixed interest
rate under these instruments at June 30, 2009 was 1.798%. The amount recorded for these instruments
as of June 30, 2009 in the consolidated balance sheet was a liability of $2.5 million. The effect
on interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was an increase of $0.3
million and $1.4 million, respectively, which included the mark to market valuation on the interest
rate swap transactions and the monthly settlement of interest.
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into interest rate swap transactions in anticipation of a
future debt issuance. These instruments, with a notional amount of $200 million, fixed the interest
rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with a railcar leasing transaction in 2006
and settled at maturity in the first quarter of 2006. The weighted average fixed interest rate
under these instruments was 4.87%. These interest rate swaps were being accounted for as cash flow
hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of $4.5 million in income recorded in AOCL
through the date the related debt issuance closed in May 2006. The balance is being amortized over
the term of the related debt. At June 30, 2009, the balance remaining in AOCL was $3.2 million. The
effect of the amortization on interest expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2009 was a decrease of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The effect on the same periods
in the prior year was a decrease of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Natural gas and diesel fuel
We continue a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the price of natural gas and
diesel fuel purchases. The intent of the program is to protect our operating profit from adverse
price changes by entering into derivative instruments. For those instruments that do not qualify
for hedge accounting treatment, any changes in their valuation are recorded directly to the
consolidated statement of operations. The amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet for
natural gas hedges was a liability of $0.3 million as of June 30, 2009. The amount recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet for diesel fuel hedges was an asset of $0.2 million and $0.1 million of
income in AOCL. The effect of both derivatives on the consolidated statement of operations was
operating income of $0.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, and operating
expense of $1.5 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, which includes the mark to
market valuation resulting in a gain of $0.2 million and a loss of $0.2 million for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The effect on the consolidated statement of
operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was operating income of $8.5
million and $9.9 million, respectively, which includes the mark to market valuation resulting in
gains of $7.6 million and $8.9 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008,
respectively.
Foreign Exchange Hedge
During the first and second quarters of 2009, we entered into foreign exchange hedges to
mitigate the impact on operating profit of unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates. These instruments are short term with quarterly maturities and no remaining balance in AOCL.
The effect on the consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 was expense of $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, included in other, net on the
consolidated statement of operations.
Zinc
In 2008, we continued a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the price of zinc
purchases. The intent of this program was to protect our operating profit from adverse price
changes by entering into derivative instruments. These instruments were short term with monthly
maturities and no remaining balances in AOCL. The effect on the consolidated statement of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was operating income of $0.3 million
and $0.9 million, respectively. We have not entered into any new zinc derivative instruments in
2009.
34
Contractual Obligation and Commercial Commitments
As of June 30, 2009, other commercial commitments related to letters of credit decreased to
$90.1 million from $98.8 million as of December 31, 2008. Refer to Note 9 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements for changes to our outstanding debt and maturities. Other commercial
commitments that relate to operating leases under sale/leaseback transactions were basically
unchanged as of June 30, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about recent accounting
pronouncements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q (or statements otherwise made by the Company or on the
Companys behalf from time to time in other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), news releases, conferences, World Wide Web postings or otherwise) contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Any statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
and involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include expectations,
beliefs, plans, objectives, future financial performances, estimates, projections, goals, and
forecasts. Trinity uses the words anticipates, believes, estimates, expects, intends,
forecasts, may, will, should, and similar expressions to identify these forward-looking
statements. Potential factors which could cause our actual results of operations to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others:
|
|
market conditions and demand for our business products and services; |
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of industries in which we compete; |
|
|
|
variations in weather in areas where our construction and energy products are sold, used,
or installed; |
|
|
|
disruption of manufacturing capacity due to weather related events; |
|
|
|
the timing of introduction of new products; |
|
|
|
the timing of customer orders or a breach of customer contracts; |
|
|
|
the credit worthiness of customers and their access to capital; |
|
|
|
product price changes; |
|
|
|
changes in mix of products sold; |
|
|
|
the extent of utilization of manufacturing capacity; |
|
|
|
availability and costs of steel, component parts, supplies, and other raw materials; |
|
|
|
competition and other competitive factors; |
|
|
|
changing technologies; |
|
|
|
surcharges and other fees added to contracted pricing agreements for raw materials; |
|
|
|
interest rates and capital costs; |
|
|
|
counter-party risks for financial instruments; |
|
|
|
long-term funding of our operations; |
|
|
|
taxes; |
|
|
|
the stability of the governments and political and business conditions in certain foreign
countries, particularly Mexico; |
|
|
|
changes in import and export quotas and regulations; |
|
|
|
business conditions in foreign economies; |
|
|
|
results of litigation; and |
|
|
|
legal, regulatory, and environmental issues. |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made.
Trinity undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
35
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There has been no material change in our market risks since December 31, 2008. Refer to Item
2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for a
discussion of debt-related activity and the impact of hedging activity for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect
the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC, and to process,
summarize, and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC.
The Companys Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers are responsible for establishing and
maintaining these procedures and, as required by the rules of the SEC, evaluating their
effectiveness. Based on their evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures which
took place as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Chief Executive and Chief
Financial Officers believe that these procedures are effective to ensure that the Company is able
to collect, process, and disclose the information it is required to disclose in the reports it
files with the SEC within the required time periods.
Internal Controls
The Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance
that: transactions are executed in accordance with managements general or specific authorization;
transactions are recorded as necessary (1) to permit preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and (2) to maintain accountability for
assets; access to assets is permitted only in accordance with managements general or specific
authorization; and the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at
reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.
During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Companys internal
controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to
materially affect the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
36
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information provided in Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements is hereby
incorporated into this Part II, Item 1 by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of
our 2008 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
This table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of its
Common Stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Shares |
|
Paid per |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
Share(1) |
|
Programs (2) |
|
or Programs (2) |
April 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009 |
|
|
5,086 |
|
|
$ |
9.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,536,481 |
|
May 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009 |
|
|
104,437 |
|
|
$ |
15.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,536,481 |
|
June 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 |
|
|
6,613 |
|
|
$ |
13.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,536,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
116,136 |
|
|
$ |
14.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,536,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These columns include the following transactions during the three months ended June 30,
2009: (i) the surrender to the Company of 105,495 shares of common stock to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock issued to
employees and (ii) the purchase of 10,641 shares of common stock by the Trustee for assets
held in a non-qualified employee profit sharing plan trust.. |
|
(2) |
|
On December 13, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million stock
repurchase program of its common stock. This program allows for the repurchase of the
Companys common stock through December 31, 2009. No shares were purchased under this
program for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Since the inception of this program
through June 30, 2009, the Company has repurchased a total of 3,532,728 shares at a cost of
approximately $67.5 million. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held May 4, 2009, stockholders elected ten (10)
directors for a one-year term (Proposal 1) and approved ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2009 (Proposal 2). The vote
tabulation follows for each proposal:
Proposal 1 Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
John L. Adams |
|
|
68,735,592 |
|
|
|
1,610,809 |
|
Rhys J. Best |
|
|
68,366,803 |
|
|
|
1,979,598 |
|
David W. Biegler |
|
|
66,979,534 |
|
|
|
3,366,867 |
|
Leldon E. Echols |
|
|
67,027,058 |
|
|
|
3,319,343 |
|
Ronald J. Gafford |
|
|
66,828,218 |
|
|
|
3,518,183 |
|
Ronald W. Haddock |
|
|
67,003,559 |
|
|
|
3,342,842 |
|
Jess T. Hay |
|
|
58,147,482 |
|
|
|
12,198,919 |
|
Adrian Lajous |
|
|
68,782,917 |
|
|
|
1,563,484 |
|
Diana S. Natalicio |
|
|
68,628,807 |
|
|
|
1,717,594 |
|
Timothy R. Wallace |
|
|
67,864,774 |
|
|
|
2,481,627 |
|
37
Proposal 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors for 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Broker Non-votes |
69,655,755
|
|
|
547,183 |
|
|
|
143,458 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
None.
38
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Second Amendment and Restatement dated as of May 29, 2009 of Warehouse Loan
Agreement dated as of June 27, 2002 among Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity
Rail Leasing Warehouse Trust (formerly known as Trinity Rail Leasing Trust II), The
Committed Lenders and the Conduit Lenders from time to time party hereto, Credit
Suisse, New York Branch, as Agent, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Collateral Agent
and Depositary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Form 8-K filed on
June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
|
|
|
By |
/s/ WILLIAM A. MCWHIRTER II
|
|
|
|
William A. McWhirter II |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer July 30, 2009 |
|
40
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Second Amendment and Restatement dated as of May 29, 2009 of Warehouse Loan
Agreement dated as of June 27, 2002 among Trinity Industries Leasing Company, Trinity
Rail Leasing Warehouse Trust (formerly known as Trinity Rail Leasing Trust II), The
Committed Lenders and the Conduit Lenders from time to time party hereto, Credit
Suisse, New York Branch, as Agent, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Collateral Agent
and Depositary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to our Form 8-K filed on
June 2, 2009). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). |
41