10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-32136
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-0057959 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
333 Earle Ovington Boulevard, Suite 900
|
|
11553 |
Uniondale, NY
|
|
Zip Code |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(516) 832-8002
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date. Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 20,836,847 outstanding
(excluding 279,400 shares held in the treasury) as of April 30, 2008.
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description
of our business or the risks associated with an investment in Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. We urge you
to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report.
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other
things, the operating performance of our investments and financing needs. Forward-looking
statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will,
should, potential, intend, expect, endeavor, seek, anticipate, estimate,
overestimate, underestimate, believe, could, project, predict, continue or other
similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss
future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain projections of results of
operations or of financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to
predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set
forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ
materially from forecasted results. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our
operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions
generally and the real estate market specifically; adverse changes in the financing markets we
access affecting our ability to finance our loan and investment portfolio; changes in interest
rates; the quality and size of the investment pipeline and the rate at which we can invest our
cash; impairments in the value of the collateral underlying our loans and investments; changes in
the markets; legislative/regulatory changes; completion of pending investments; the availability
and cost of capital for future investments; competition within the finance and real estate
industries; and other risks detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2007. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking
statements, which reflect our managements views as of the date of this report. The factors noted
above could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any
forward-looking statement. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust,
Inc. and Subsidiaries Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report
to conform these statements to actual results.
i
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,961,360 |
|
|
$ |
22,219,541 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
76,570,283 |
|
|
|
139,136,105 |
|
Loans and investments, net |
|
|
2,577,429,004 |
|
|
|
2,592,093,930 |
|
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value |
|
|
11,846,043 |
|
|
|
15,696,743 |
|
Investment in equity affiliates |
|
|
29,465,190 |
|
|
|
29,590,190 |
|
Prepaid management fee related party |
|
|
19,047,949 |
|
|
|
19,047,949 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
94,970,403 |
|
|
|
83,709,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,822,290,232 |
|
|
$ |
2,901,493,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
196,995,819 |
|
|
$ |
244,937,929 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
1,132,829,000 |
|
|
|
1,151,009,000 |
|
Junior subordinated notes to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities |
|
|
276,055,000 |
|
|
|
276,055,000 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
599,303,222 |
|
|
|
596,160,338 |
|
Due to related party |
|
|
1,964,256 |
|
|
|
2,429,109 |
|
Due to borrowers |
|
|
11,869,828 |
|
|
|
18,265,906 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
77,123,133 |
|
|
|
77,123,133 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
90,740,091 |
|
|
|
67,395,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,386,880,349 |
|
|
|
2,433,376,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
67,529,989 |
|
|
|
72,854,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized;
3,776,069 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
37,761 |
|
|
|
37,761 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 500,000,000 shares authorized;
20,885,507 shares issued, 20,606,107 shares outstanding at
March 31, 2008 and 20,798,735 shares issued, 20,519,335 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
208,855 |
|
|
|
207,987 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
372,670,690 |
|
|
|
365,376,136 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 279,400 shares |
|
|
(7,023,361 |
) |
|
|
(7,023,361 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
65,591,339 |
|
|
|
65,665,951 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(63,605,390 |
) |
|
|
(29,001,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
367,879,894 |
|
|
|
395,263,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,822,290,232 |
|
|
$ |
2,901,493,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
55,416,330 |
|
|
$ |
66,460,653 |
|
Other income |
|
|
20,693 |
|
|
|
6,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
55,437,023 |
|
|
|
66,466,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
31,304,099 |
|
|
|
32,112,519 |
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
1,977,343 |
|
|
|
1,730,355 |
|
Selling and administrative |
|
|
1,538,066 |
|
|
|
1,221,372 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee related party |
|
|
2,579,433 |
|
|
|
4,873,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
40,398,941 |
|
|
|
39,937,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income from equity
affiliates,
minority interest and provision for
income
taxes |
|
|
15,038,082 |
|
|
|
26,528,895 |
|
Income from equity affiliates, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and
provision for income taxes |
|
|
15,038,082 |
|
|
|
26,528,895 |
|
Income allocated to minority interest |
|
|
2,333,290 |
|
|
|
3,680,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
12,704,792 |
|
|
|
22,848,581 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,085,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,704,792 |
|
|
$ |
16,763,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
20,571,780 |
|
|
|
17,183,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,403,381 |
|
|
|
21,029,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Additional |
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Stock |
|
Treasury |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
Shares |
|
Par Value |
|
Shares |
|
Par Value |
|
Capital |
|
Shares |
|
Stock |
|
Earnings |
|
Loss |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance- January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,776,069 |
|
|
$ |
37,761 |
|
|
|
20,798,735 |
|
|
$ |
207,987 |
|
|
$ |
365,376,136 |
|
|
|
(279,400 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,023,361 |
) |
|
$ |
65,665,951 |
|
|
$ |
(29,001,389 |
) |
|
$ |
395,263,085 |
|
Issuance of common stock for
management incentive fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,772 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
1,397,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributionscommon stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,779,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,779,404 |
) |
Adjustment to minority interest
from decreased ownership in
ARLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,316,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,316,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
12,704,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,704,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,704,792 |
|
Net unrealized loss on securities
available for sale |
|
|
(3,850,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,850,700 |
) |
|
|
(3,850,700 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivative
financial instruments |
|
|
(30,753,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,753,301 |
) |
|
|
(30,753,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(21,899,209 |
) |
|
|
3,776,069 |
|
|
$ |
37,761 |
|
|
|
20,885,507 |
|
|
$ |
208,855 |
|
|
$ |
372,670,690 |
|
|
|
(279,400 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,023,361 |
) |
|
$ |
65,591,339 |
|
|
$ |
(63,605,390 |
) |
|
$ |
367,879,894 |
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,704,792 |
|
|
$ |
16,763,581 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
581,137 |
|
|
|
451,560 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
2,333,290 |
|
|
|
3,680,314 |
|
Amortization and accretion of interest |
|
|
493,521 |
|
|
|
443,061 |
|
Non-cash incentive compensation to manager related party |
|
|
837,424 |
|
|
|
4,196,867 |
|
Gain on sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,182 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others assets |
|
|
3,659,032 |
|
|
|
(9,275,749 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(10,908,986 |
) |
|
|
14,503,093 |
|
Deferred origination fees |
|
|
132,518 |
|
|
|
(4,018 |
) |
Due to related party |
|
|
95,612 |
|
|
|
618,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
12,928,340 |
|
|
|
31,347,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and investments originated and purchased, net |
|
|
(226,267,940 |
) |
|
|
(547,285,360 |
) |
Payoffs and paydowns of loans and investments |
|
|
238,656,468 |
|
|
|
269,700,044 |
|
Due to borrowers |
|
|
(6,396,078 |
) |
|
|
(2,960,498 |
) |
Prepayments on securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,358,184 |
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,792,592 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
62,565,822 |
|
|
|
(30,271,391 |
) |
Contributions to equity affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,533,084 |
) |
Distribution from equity affiliates |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided/(used) by investing activities |
|
|
68,683,272 |
|
|
|
(292,199,513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable and repurchase agreements |
|
|
63,906,967 |
|
|
|
520,209,991 |
|
Payoffs and paydowns of notes payable and repurchase agreements |
|
|
(108,706,193 |
) |
|
|
(298,611,228 |
) |
Proceeds from collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
27,000,000 |
|
|
|
55,700,000 |
|
Payoffs and paydowns of collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
(45,180,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,180,000 |
) |
Payments on swaps to hedge counterparties |
|
|
(51,110,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receipts on swaps from hedge counterparties |
|
|
38,340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid to minority interest |
|
|
(2,341,163 |
) |
|
|
(2,265,641 |
) |
Distributions paid on common stock |
|
|
(12,779,404 |
) |
|
|
(10,338,231 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312,764 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(90,869,793 |
) |
|
|
261,202,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9,258,181 |
) |
|
|
349,638 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
22,219,541 |
|
|
|
7,756,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
12,961,360 |
|
|
$ |
8,106,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used to pay interest, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
32,202,467 |
|
|
$ |
30,481,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used to pay taxes |
|
$ |
34,664 |
|
|
$ |
159,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral on swaps to hedge counterparties |
|
$ |
3,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 1
Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (the Company) is a Maryland corporation that was formed in June
2003 to invest in a diversified portfolio of multi-family and commercial real estate related
assets, primarily consisting of bridge loans, mezzanine loans, junior participating interests in
first mortgage loans, and preferred and direct equity. The Company may also directly acquire real
property and invest in real estate-related notes and certain mortgage-related securities. The
Company conducts substantially all of its operations through its operating partnership, Arbor
Realty Limited Partnership (ARLP), and ARLPs wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company is
externally managed and advised by Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC (ACM).
The Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a real estate investment
trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income
tax on its REITtaxable income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it
distributes at least 90% of its REITtaxable income and meets certain other requirements. Certain
assets of the Company that produce non-qualifying income are owned by its taxable REIT
subsidiaries, the income of which are subject to federal and state income taxes.
The Companys charter provides for the issuance of up to 500 million shares of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, and 100 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
The Company was incorporated in June 2003 and was initially capitalized through the sale of 67
shares of common stock for $1,005.
On July 1, 2003, Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC (ACM) contributed $213.1 million of
structured finance assets and $169.2 million of borrowings supported by $43.9 million of equity in
exchange for a commensurate equity ownership in ARLP. In addition, certain employees of ACM were
transferred to ARLP. These assets, liabilities and employees represent a substantial portion of
ACMs structured finance business (the SF Business). The Company is externally managed and
advised by ACM and pays ACM a management fee in accordance with a management agreement. ACM also
sources originations, provides underwriting services and services all structured finance assets on
behalf of ARLP, and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
On July 1, 2003, the Company completed a private equity offering of 1,610,000 units (including
an overallotment option), each consisting of five shares of common stock and one warrant to
purchase one share of common stock at $75.00 per unit. The Company sold 8,050,000 shares of common
stock in the offering. Gross proceeds from the private equity offering totaled $120.2 million.
Gross proceeds from the private equity offering combined with the concurrent equity contribution by
ACM totaled approximately $164.1 million in equity capital. The Company paid and accrued offering
expenses of $10.1 million resulting in stockholders equity and minority interest of $154.0 million
as a result of the private placement.
In April 2004, the Company sold 6,750,000 shares of its common stock in a public offering at a
price of $20.00 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $124.4 million after deducting the
underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses. The Company used the proceeds to pay
down indebtedness. In May 2004, the underwriters exercised a portion of their over-allotment
option, which resulted in the issuance of 524,200 additional shares. The Company received net
proceeds of approximately $9.8 million after deducting the underwriting discount. In October 2004,
ARLP received proceeds of approximately $9.4 million from the exercise of warrants for 629,345
operating partnership units. Additionally, in 2004 and 2005, the Company issued 973,354 and
282,776 shares of common stock, respectively, from the exercise of warrants under its Warrant
Agreement dated July 1, 2003, the (Warrant Agreement) and received net proceeds of $12.9 million
and $4.2 million, respectively.
On March 2, 2007, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 1933 Act) with respect to an aggregate of
$500.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants, that may be sold by
the Company from time to time pursuant to Rule 415 of the 1933 Act. On April 19, 2007, the
Commission declared this shelf registration statement effective.
5
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
In June 2007, the Company completed a public offering in which it sold 2,700,000 shares of its
common stock registered for $27.65 per share, and received net proceeds of approximately $73.6
million after deducting the underwriting discount and the other estimated offering expenses. The
Company used the proceeds to pay down debt and finance its loan and investment portfolio. The
underwriters did not exercise their over allotment option for additional shares. At March 31,
2008, the Company had $425.3 million remaining under this shelf registration.
The Company had 20,606,107 shares outstanding at March 31, 2008 and 20,519,335 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial
statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements, although management
believes that the disclosures presented herein are adequate to make the accompanying unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements presented not misleading.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the financial statements
of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and partnerships or other joint ventures which the
Company controls. Entities which the Company does not control and entities which are variable
interest entities in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the
equity method. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant
inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year
amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation. Stock based compensation
was disclosed in the Companys Consolidated Income Statement under employee compensation and
benefits for employees and under selling and administrative expense for non-employees in the
current year presentation and disclosed as a separate line item in prior years presentation.
The preparation of consolidated interim financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally
Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions in
determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated interim financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2008. The
accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Companys audited consolidated annual financial statements and the related Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered
to be cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents in high quality financial
institutions. The consolidated account balances at each institution periodically exceeds FDIC
insurance coverage and the Company believes that this risk is not significant.
6
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Restricted Cash
On March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had restricted cash of $76.6 million and
$139.1 million, respectively, on deposit with the trustees for the Companys collateralized debt
obligations (CDOs), see Note 6 Debt Obligations. Restricted cash primarily represents proceeds
from loan repayments which will be used to purchase replacement loans as collateral for the CDOs
and interest payments received from loans in the CDOs which are remitted to the Company quarterly
in the month following the quarter.
Loans and Investments
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, (SFAS 115) requires that at the time of purchase, the
Company designate a security as held to maturity, available for sale, or trading depending on
ability and intent. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, while securities and
investments held to maturity are reported at amortized cost. The Company does not have any trading
securities at this time.
Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at
cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, loan purchase discounts, and net of the
allowance for loan losses when such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. The Company
invests in preferred equity interests that, in some cases, allow the Company to participate in a
percentage of the underlying propertys cash flows from operations and proceeds from a sale or
refinancing. At the inception of each such investment, management must determine whether such
investment should be accounted for as a loan, joint venture or as real estate. To date, management
has determined that all such investments are properly accounted for and reported as loans.
The Company considers a loan impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is
probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due for both principal and interest
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are
established for impaired loans based on the fair value of collateral on an individual loan basis.
The fair value of the collateral is determined by selecting the most appropriate valuation
methodology, or methodologies, among several generally available and accepted in the commercial
real estate industry. The determination of the most appropriate valuation methodology is based on
the key characteristics of the collateral type. These methodologies include the evaluation of
operating cash flow from the property during the projected holding period, and the estimated sales
value of the collateral computed by applying an expected capitalization rate to the stabilized net
operating income of the specific property, less selling costs, discounted at market discount rates.
If upon completion of the valuation, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the
impaired loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, an allowance is created with a
corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. The allowance for each loan is maintained
at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses. The Company had an allowance
for loan losses of $4.5 million at March 31, 2008 and $2.5 million at December 31, 2007.
Capitalized Interest
The Company capitalizes interest in accordance with SFAS No. 58 Capitalization of Interest
Costs in Financial Statements that Include Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method. This
statement amended SFAS No. 34 Capitalization of Interest Costs (SFAS 34) to include investments
(equity, loans and advances) accounted for by the equity method as qualifying assets of the
investor while the investee has activities in progress necessary to commence its planned principal
operations, provided that the investees activities include the use of funds to acquire qualifying
assets for its operations. One of the Companys joint ventures, which is accounted for using the
equity method, has used funds to acquire qualifying assets for its planned principal operations.
During 2007 the joint venture sold both of the acquired properties and the Company discontinued the
capitalization of interest on its remaining investment in the joint venture as activities required
under SFAS 34 ceased to continue.
7
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company capitalized $0 and $0.3 million, respectively, of interest relating to this investment.
Revenue Recognition
Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis as it is earned from loans, investments,
and available-for-sale securities. In many instances, the borrower pays an additional amount of
interest at the time the loan is closed, an origination fee, and deferred interest upon maturity.
In some cases interest income may also include the amortization or accretion of premiums and
discounts arising from the purchase or origination of the loan. This additional income, net of any
direct loan origination costs incurred, is deferred and accreted into interest income on an
effective yield or interest method adjusted for actual prepayment activity over the life of the
related loan or available-for-sale security as a yield adjustment. Income recognition is suspended
for loans when in the opinion of management a full recovery of income and principal becomes
doubtful. Income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and
performance is demonstrated to be resumed.
Several of the loans provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, which differ from
current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to
managements determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately
collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If management
cannot make this determination regarding collectibility, interest income above the current pay rate
is recognized only upon actual receipt. Additionally, interest income is recorded when earned from
equity participation interests, referred to as equity kickers. These equity kickers have the
potential to generate additional revenues to the Company as a result of excess cash flows being
distributed and/or as appreciated properties are sold or refinanced. The Company recorded $0.3
million of interest on such loans and investments for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to $16.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Income from Equity Affiliates
The Company invests in joint ventures that are formed to acquire, develop, and/or sell real
estate assets. These joint ventures are not majority owned or controlled by the Company, and are
not consolidated in its financial statements. These investments are recorded under either the
equity or cost method of accounting as appropriate. The Company records its share of the net
income and losses from the underlying properties on a single line item in the consolidated income
statements as income from equity affiliates.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company records stock-based compensation expense at the grant date fair value of the
related stock-based award in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, (SFAS 123R). The Company measures the compensation costs for these shares as of
the date of the grant, with subsequent remeasurement for any unvested shares granted to
non-employees of the Company with such amounts expensed against earnings, at the grant date (for
the portion that vest immediately) or ratably over the respective vesting periods. The cost of
these grants is amortized over the vesting term using an accelerated method in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 28 Accounting for Stock
Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Options or Award Plans (FIN 28), and SFAS 123R.
Dividends are paid on the restricted shares as dividends are paid on shares of the Companys common
stock whether or not they are vested.
Income Taxes
The Company is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on its REITtaxable income
that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes at least 90% of its
REITtaxable income and meets certain other requirements. Certain assets of the Company that
produce non-qualifying income are owned by its taxable REIT subsidiaries, the income of which are
subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company recorded a $0 and $6.1 million provision
for income taxes related to the assets that are held in taxable REIT subsidiaries for the three
8
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Companys accounting policy with respect
to interest and penalties related to tax uncertainties is to classify these amounts as provision
for income taxes. The Company has not recognized any interest and penalties related to tax
uncertainties for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
SFAS No. 130 Reporting Comprehensive Income, divides comprehensive income into net income
and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes unrealized gains and losses on available for
sale securities. In addition, to the extent the Companys derivative instruments qualify as hedges
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, net unrealized
gains or losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), see
Derivatives and Hedging Activities below. At March 31, 2008, accumulated other comprehensive
loss was $63.6 million and consisted of $4.9 million in unrealized losses related to available for
sale securities and $58.7 million of unrealized losses on derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), as amended by SFAS No.
138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities (SFAS 138).
SFAS 133, as amended by SFAS 138, requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets
or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and to measure those instruments at fair value.
Additionally, the fair value adjustments will affect either other comprehensive income (loss) in
stockholders equity until the hedged item is recognized in earnings or net income depending on
whether the derivative instrument qualifies as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the
nature of the hedging activity.
In the normal course of business, the Company may use a variety of derivative financial
instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. These derivative financial instruments must
be effective in reducing its interest rate risk exposure in order to qualify for hedge accounting.
When the terms of an underlying transaction are modified, or when the underlying hedged item ceases
to exist, all changes in the fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in
value included in net income for each period until the derivative instrument matures or is settled.
Any derivative instrument used for risk management that does not meet the hedging criteria is
marked-to-market with the changes in value included in net income.
Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation. The Company relies on
quotations from a third party to determine these fair values.
Variable Interest Entities
FASB issued Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46),
which requires a variable interest entity (VIE) to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary
(PB). The PB is the party that absorbs a majority of the VIEs anticipated losses and/or a
majority of the expected returns.
The Company has evaluated its loans and investments and investments in equity affiliates to
determine whether they are VIEs. This evaluation resulted in the Company determining that its
bridge loans, junior participation loans, mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments and
investments in equity affiliates were potential variable interests. For each of these investments,
the Company has evaluated (1) the sufficiency of the fair value of the entities equity investments
at risk to absorb losses, (2) that as a group the holders of the equity investments at risk have
(a) the direct or indirect ability through voting rights to make decisions about the entities
significant activities, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity and their
obligations are not protected directly or indirectly, (c) the right to receive the expected
residual return of the entity and their rights are not capped, (3) the voting rights of these
investors are proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their
9
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
rights to receive the expected returns of the equity, or both, and that substantially all of the
entities activities do not involve or are not conducted on behalf of an investor that has
disproportionately few voting rights. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has identified 42 loans
and investments which were made to entities determined to be VIEs.
Entities that issue junior subordinated notes are considered VIEs. However, it is not
appropriate to consolidate these entities under the provisions of FIN 46 as equity interests are
variable interests only to the extent that the investment is considered to be at risk. Since the
Companys investments were funded by the entities that issued the junior subordinated notes, they
are not considered to be at risk.
For the 42 VIEs identified, the Company has determined that it is not the primary
beneficiaries of the VIEs and as such the VIEs should not be consolidated in the Companys
financial statements. The Companys maximum exposure to loss would not exceed the carrying amount
of such investments. For all other investments, the Company has determined they are not VIEs. As
such, the Company has continued to account for these loans and investments as a loan or investment
in equity affiliate, as appropriate.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157 In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new
fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior
accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, which
delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). The effective date is delayed by one year to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Effective January
1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities recognized at fair value
on a recurring basis. The partial adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did
not have an impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, regarding the delayed application of SFAS No. 157 on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 159 In February 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159) which permits entities to voluntarily
choose to measure many financial instruments, and certain other items at fair value and is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS 159 as of
January 1, 2008 and elected not to treat any of its financial assets or liabilities under the fair
value option. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have an impact on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
FIN 39-1 In April 2007, the FASB issued FIN No. 39-1, Amendment of FASB
Interpretation No. 39 (FIN 39-1). FIN 39-1 defines right of setoff and specifies what
conditions must be met for a derivative contract to qualify for this right of setoff. FIN 39-1
also addresses the applicability of a right of setoff to derivative instruments and clarifies the
circumstances in which it is appropriate to offset amounts recognized for those instruments in the
balance sheet. In addition, FIN 39-1 permits offsetting of fair value amounts recognized for
multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting
arrangement and fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a
receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) arising from the same master
netting arrangement as the derivative instruments. FIN 39-1 is effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2008. The adoption of FIN 39-1 did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
FSP FAS 140-3 In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-3
(FSP FAS 140-3), Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions. FSP FAS 140-3 provides guidance on accounting for a transfer of a financial asset
and a repurchase financing. It presumes that an initial transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing are considered part of the same arrangement (a linked
10
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
transaction) unless certain criteria are met. If the criteria are not met, the linked transaction would be recorded as
a net investment, likely as a derivative, instead of recording the purchased financial asset on a
gross basis along with a repurchase financing. FSP FAS 140-3 applies to reporting periods
beginning after November 15, 2008 and is only applied prospectively to transactions that occur on
or after the adoption date. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the adoption of FSP FAS
140-3 may have on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
SOP 07-1 In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) 07-1 Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and
Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method
Investors for Investments in Investment Companies (SOP 07-1). SOP 07-1 provides guidance for
determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide
Investment Companies. The SOP is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2007. However, in February 2008 the FASB issued FSP SOP 07-1-1 which
delays indefinitely the effective date of SOP 07-1 and prohibits adoption of SOP 07-1 for an entity
that had not adopted SOP 07-1 before issuance of the final FSP. While the Company maintains an
exemption from the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (Investment Company Act) and is
therefore not regulated as an investment company, it is nonetheless in the process of assessing
whether SOP 07-1 could be applicable upon becoming effective.
SFAS No. 141 (R) In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)) which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations and requires a
company to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest
in the acquired entity to be measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. SFAS 141(R)
also requires acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred and does not permit certain
restructuring activities previously allowed under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3 to be
recorded as a component of purchase accounting. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
effect the adoption of SFAS 141 (R) may have on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 160 In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Accounting for
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 clarifies the classification of noncontrolling
interests in consolidated statements of financial position and the accounting for and reporting of
transactions between the Company and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under SFAS 160,
noncontrolling interests are considered equity and should be reported as an element of consolidated
equity. The current practice of classifying minority interests within a mezzanine section of the
statement of financial position will be eliminated. Under SFAS 160, net income will encompass the
total income of all consolidated subsidiaries and will require separate disclosure on the face of
the income statement of income attributable to the controlling and noncontrolling interests.
Increases and decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount will be accounted for as
equity transactions. When a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained, noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary
must be measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008 and earlier application is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the effect the
adoption of SFAS 160 may have on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 161 In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS
161). SFAS 161 requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose information that should
enable financial-statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments,
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities and how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect a companys financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008 and early application is permitted. Because SFAS 161 impacts the
Companys disclosure and not its accounting treatment for derivative instruments and related hedged
items, the Companys adoption of SFAS 161 will not impact the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
11
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 3 Loans and Investments
The following table sets forth the composition of the Companys loan and investment portfolio
at the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008 |
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Wtd. Avg. |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
Wtd. Avg. |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
|
Count |
|
|
Pay Rate |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge loans |
|
$ |
1,640,288,311 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
$ |
1,646,505,888 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
7.30 |
% |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
% |
Mezzanine loans. |
|
|
402,653,774 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
384,479,759 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
8.39 |
% |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
9.23 |
% |
Junior
participations |
|
|
322,547,737 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
340,821,550 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7.07 |
% |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
7.70 |
% |
Preferred equity
investments |
|
|
218,637,959 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
220,387,959 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
9.42 |
% |
Other |
|
|
11,174,903 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
11,400,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,595,302,684 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,603,595,428 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
% |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
8.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
revenue |
|
|
(13,373,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,001,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
loan losses |
|
|
(4,500,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and
investments, net |
|
$ |
2,577,429,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,592,093,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following transactions represent loans and investments that were satisfied during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 in which the Company had retained a profits interest in the
borrowing entity.
Richland Terrace
During 2006, the Company originated a $7.2 million bridge loan and a $0.3 million preferred
equity investment secured by garden-style and townhouse apartments in South Carolina. The Company
also had a 25.0% carried profits interest in the borrowing entity. In January 2008, the borrowing
entity refinanced the property through ACMs Fannie Mae program and the Company received $0.3
million for its profits interest as well as full repayment of the $0.3 million preferred equity
investment and the $7.0 million outstanding balance on the bridge loan. The Company retained its
25% carried profits interest.
Lake in the Woods
At December 31, 2006, there was an $8.5 million junior participation loan in the loan and
investment portfolio that was non-performing and for which income recognition had been suspended.
In March 2007, the Company purchased the senior position of the first mortgage loan associated with
this property for $34.6 million. The senior loan had a maturity date of January 2008, bore
interest based at LIBOR plus 237 basis points and was also considered non-performing. During the
second quarter of 2007, the Company obtained title to the property pursuant to the execution of a
deed in lieu of foreclosure and subsequently sold the property to a new investor. As part of the
purchase, the new investor committed approximately $2.0 million of capital and the Company provided
a total of $45.0 million of new financing through a $43.5 million bridge loan and a $1.5 million
preferred equity investment. The loan and investment mature in June 2012 and bear interest at a
fixed rate of 7.75%. The Company also retained a 50% profits interest in the property. The
Company established a $1.0 million provision for loan loss
12
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
related to this property reducing the
carrying value to $44.0 million at December 31, 2007. Interest income totaling $0.7 million was
not received or recognized on this loan during the first quarter of 2008 prior to the property
being sold in February 2008 with the Company providing the financing for the new transaction as
described below.
In February 2008, the property was sold for approximately $45.9 million and the Company
provided the new sponsor with a $45.0 million first mortgage with a maturity date of February 2013
that bears interest at an initial fixed rate of 6.75% (of which 6.25% will be paid currently and
0.50% will be permitted to accumulate) which increases to 6.75% (all of which will be paid) in the
second and third year and to 7.75% for the fourth and fifth year of the loan. As part of the sale,
the Company assumed approximately $2.1 million of advances for operating costs on behalf of the seller, increasing the carrying value of the loan to $46.1 million at the
time of sale. As a result of the transaction, the Company received $0.9 million of cash proceeds,
charged-off $1.0 million against the allowance for loan losses and incurred an additional loss of
$0.2 million which was recorded in selling and administrative expense.
The new sponsor funded $3.9 million of equity including a $2.6 million cash interest and
capital expenditure reserve and $1.3 million of closing costs. In accordance with the terms of the
new agreement, the Company has not retained a profits interest in the property.
Concentration of Borrower Risk
The Company is subject to concentration risk in that, as of March 31, 2008, the unpaid
principal balance related to 31 loans with five unrelated borrowers represented approximately 26%
of total assets. The Company had 145 loans and investments as of March 31, 2008. As of March 31,
2008, 41.1%, 11.2%, and 10.8% of the outstanding balance of the Companys loans and investments
portfolio had underlying properties in New York, Florida and California, respectively.
Impaired Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company considers a loan impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is
probable that it will be unable to collect all amounts due for both principal and interest
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. As a result of the Companys normal
quarterly loan review at March 31, 2008, it was determined that three multi-family loans and an
office building loan with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $84.1 million were
impaired. At December 31, 2007, two multi-family loans with an aggregate outstanding principal
balance of $58.5 million were impaired.
The Company performed an evaluation of the loans and determined that the fair value of the
underlying collateral securing the impaired loans was less than the net carrying value of the
loans, resulting in the Company recording a $3.0 million provision for loan losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. The Company did not record a provision for loan losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company established a $1.0 million loan loss reserve
related to a $45.0 million loan and investment on the Lake in the Woods property. In the first
quarter of 2008, the property was sold and as a result of the transaction, the Company charged-off
$1.0 million against the allowance for loan losses and incurred an additional loss of $0.2 million,
which was recorded in selling and administrative expense. See the Lake in the Woods discussion
above for further details on the transaction.
13
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
A summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at beginning of the period |
|
$ |
2,500,000 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance at end of the period |
|
$ |
4,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, one of the four loans reserved for, with an outstanding principal
balance of approximately $5.0 million, has been classified as non-performing. Income is recognized
on a cash basis only to the extent it is received. Full income recognition will resume when the
loan becomes contractually current and performance has recommenced.
Note 4 Available-For-Sale Securities
The following is a summary of the Companys available-for-sale securities at March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity securities |
|
$ |
16,715,584 |
|
|
$ |
(4,869,541 |
) |
|
$ |
11,846,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
16,715,584 |
|
|
$ |
(4,869,541 |
) |
|
$ |
11,846,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Companys available-for-sale securities at December 31,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity securities |
|
$ |
16,715,584 |
|
|
$ |
(1,018,841 |
) |
|
$ |
15,696,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
16,715,584 |
|
|
$ |
(1,018,841 |
) |
|
$ |
15,696,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, the Company purchased 2,939,465 shares of common stock of CBRE Realty Finance,
Inc., a commercial real estate specialty finance company, which had a fair value of $11.8 million,
at March 31, 2008 and a fair value of $15.7 million at December 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2008,
these securities have been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and the
Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company has
a margin loan agreement with a financial institution related to the purchases of this security.
The margin loan may not exceed $7.0 million, bears interest at pricing over LIBOR, and is due upon
demand from the lender. The balance of the margin loan agreement was approximately $3.0 million at
March 31, 2008.
The cumulative amount of other comprehensive loss related to unrealized losses on these
securities as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $4.9 and $1.0 million, respectively.
14
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 5 Investment in Equity Affiliates
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $29.5 million and $29.6 million of
investments in equity affiliates, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Equity |
|
|
|
Investment in Equity Affiliates at |
|
|
Affiliates at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Equity Affiliates |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930 Flushing & 80 Evergreen |
|
$ |
575,724 |
|
|
$ |
700,724 |
|
|
$ |
29,515,333 |
|
450 West 33rd Street |
|
|
1,136,960 |
|
|
|
1,136,960 |
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
1107 Broadway. |
|
|
5,720,000 |
|
|
|
5,720,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1133 York Ave |
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alpine Meadows |
|
|
13,219,813 |
|
|
|
13,219,813 |
|
|
|
29,971,310 |
|
St. Johns Development |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
Issuance of Junior Subordinated Notes |
|
|
8,305,000 |
|
|
|
8,305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,465,190 |
|
|
$ |
29,590,190 |
|
|
$ |
134,486,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930 Flushing & 80 Evergreen
The Company recorded a $0.1 million return of capital from its equity investment on a capital
contribution made in 2007.
450
West
33rd
Street
In May 2007, the Company, as part of an investor group for the 450 West 33rd Street
partnership, transferred control of the underlying property (an office building) to Broadway
Partners for a value of approximately $664.0 million. The investor group, on a pro-rata basis,
retained an approximate 2% ownership interest in the property and 50% of the propertys air rights
which resulted in the Company retaining an investment in equity affiliates of approximately $1.1
million related to its 29% interest in the 2% retained ownership. In accordance with this
transaction, the joint venture members agreed to guarantee $258.1 million of the $517.0 million of
new debt outstanding on the property. The guarantee expires at the earlier of maturity or
prepayment of the debt and was allocated to the members in accordance with their ownership
percentages. The guarantee is callable, on a pro-rata basis, if the market value of the property
declines below the $258.1 million of debt guaranteed. The Companys portion of the guarantee is
$76.3 million. The transaction was structured to provide for a tax deferral for an estimated
period of seven years. The Company recorded deferred revenue of approximately $77.1 million as a
result of the guarantee on a portion of the new debt.
15
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 6 Debt Obligations
The Company utilizes repurchase agreements, term and revolving credit agreements, warehouse
lines of credit, working capital lines, loan participations, collateralized debt obligations and
junior subordinated notes to finance certain of its loans and investments. Borrowings underlying
these arrangements are primarily secured by a significant amount of the Companys loans and
investments.
Repurchase Agreements
The following table outlines borrowings under the Companys repurchase agreements as of March
31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Repurchase agreement, Nomura
Credit and Capital, Inc., $100
million committed line,
expired December 2007 with
final repayment due June 2008
(repaid in February 2008),
interest is variable based on
one-month LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was 0% and
7.10%, respectively |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,321,740 |
|
|
$ |
38,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreement,
financial institution, $200
million committed line,
expiration October 2009,
interest is variable based on
one-month LIBOR, the weighted
average note rate was 3.79%
and 6.03%, respectively |
|
|
152,532,501 |
|
|
|
209,862,538 |
|
|
|
165,571,254 |
|
|
|
241,547,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreement,
financial institution, $100
million committed line,
expiration September 2008,
interest is variable based on
one-month LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was 4.68%
and 6.66%, respectively |
|
|
44,463,318 |
|
|
|
55,585,478 |
|
|
|
56,044,935 |
|
|
|
70,103,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
196,995,819 |
|
|
$ |
265,448,016 |
|
|
$ |
244,937,929 |
|
|
$ |
349,651,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys $100.0 million master repurchase agreement with Nomura Credit and Capital, Inc.
expired in December 2007. The Company exercised its right under the repurchase agreement to extend
the repayment date until June 2008. This facility was repaid in its entirety in February 2008.
The Company has a $100.0 million repurchase agreement that bears interest at pricing over
LIBOR and has a maturity date of September 2008. In January 2008, the Company was notified that no
further advances could be taken under this facility. The facility matures in September 2008 and,
under the terms of the repurchase agreement the facility will be paid in its entirety by December
2008.
In certain circumstances, the Company has financed the purchase of investments from a
counterparty through a repurchase agreement with that same counterparty. The Company currently
records these investments in the same manner as other investments financed with repurchase
agreements, with the investment recorded as an asset and the related borrowing under the repurchase
agreement as a liability on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Interest income earned on
the investments and interest expense incurred on the repurchase obligations are reported separately
on the consolidated income statement. These transactions may not qualify as a purchase by the
Company under FSP FAS 140-3 which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
The Company would be required to present the net investment on the balance sheet as a derivative
with the corresponding change in fair value of the derivative being recorded in the income
statement. The value of the derivative would reflect not only changes in the value of the
underlying investment, but also changes in the value of
the underlying credit provided by the counterparty. See Note 2 Summary of Significant
Accounting Polices Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements for further details.
16
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Junior Subordinated Notes
The following table outlines borrowings under the Companys junior subordinated notes as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
March 2034, unsecured, face amount
of $27.1 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
6.44% and 8.58%, respectively |
|
$ |
27,070,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,070,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
March 2034, unsecured, face amount
of $25.8 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.87% and 8.31%, respectively |
|
|
25,780,000 |
|
|
|
25,780,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
April 2035, unsecured, face amount
of $25.8 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.35% and 7.42%, respectively |
|
|
25,774,000 |
|
|
|
25,774,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
July 2035, unsecured, face amount of
$25.8 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
6.62% and 8.23%, respectively |
|
|
25,774,000 |
|
|
|
25,774,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
January 2036, unsecured, face amount
of $51.6 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.01% and 7.76%, respectively |
|
|
51,550,000 |
|
|
|
51,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
July 2036, unsecured, face amount of
$51.6 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.87% and 7.93%, respectively |
|
|
51,550,000 |
|
|
|
51,550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
June 2036, unsecured, face amount of
$15.5 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.79% and 7.85%, respectively |
|
|
15,464,000 |
|
|
|
15,464,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
April 2037, unsecured, face amount
of $14.4 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.17% and 7.24%, respectively |
|
|
14,433,000 |
|
|
|
14,433,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes, maturity
April 2037, unsecured, face amount
of $38.7 million, interest rate
variable based on three-month LIBOR,
the weighted average note rate was
7.17% and 7.23%, respectively |
|
|
38,660,000 |
|
|
|
38,660,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total junior subordinated notes |
|
$ |
276,055,000 |
|
|
$ |
276,055,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The junior subordinated notes are unsecured, have a maturity of 30 years, pay interest
quarterly at a floating rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR and, absent the occurrence of
special events, are not redeemable during the first five years.
The outstanding balance under these facilities was $276.1 million at both March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007. The current weighted average note rate was 7.36% at March 31, 2008 and 7.84%
December 31, 2007. The impact of these entities in accordance with FIN 46R Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities is discussed in Note 2.
17
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Notes Payable
The following table outlines borrowings under the Companys notes payable as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term credit
agreement, Wachovia
Bank, National
Association, $473
million committed
line, expiration
November 2009,
interest is variable
based on one-month
LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was
5.17% and 6.87%,
respectively |
|
$ |
382,749,999 |
|
|
$ |
620,523,294 |
|
|
$ |
412,095,278 |
|
|
$ |
768,814,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit
agreement, Wachovia
Bank, National
Association, $100
million committed
line, expiration
November 2009,
interest is variable
based on one-month
LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was
5.17% and 6.89%,
respectively |
|
|
44,687,383 |
|
|
|
71,032,262 |
|
|
|
6,759,220 |
|
|
|
26,127,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term credit
agreement, Wachovia
Bank, National
Association, $69
million committed
line, expiration
November 2009,
interest is variable
based on one-month
LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was
5.28% and 7.36%,
respectively |
|
|
64,000,000 |
|
|
|
115,000,000 |
|
|
|
66,500,000 |
|
|
|
115,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge loan
warehouse, financial
institution, $90
million committed
line, expiration
October 2008,
interest rate
variable based on
Prime or LIBOR, the
weighted average note
rate was 5.26% and
6.51%,
respectively |
|
|
59,957,875 |
|
|
|
89,586,209 |
|
|
|
62,897,875 |
|
|
|
93,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
facility, Wachovia
Bank, National
Association; $60
million committed
line, expiration June
2008 with two one
year renewal options,
interest is variable
based on one-month
LIBOR, the weighted
average note rate was
4.87% and 6.96%,
respectively |
|
|
47,907,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,907,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
599,303,222 |
|
|
$ |
896,141,765 |
|
|
$ |
596,160,338 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,992,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $60.0 million working capital facility with Wachovia Bank, National Association has an
expiration date in June 2008 with two one year renewal options and interest is variable based on
one-month LIBOR. The Company currently expects to renew this facility for the first of its two one
year renewal options.
In November 2007, the Company entered in two new credit agreements with Wachovia which
replaced two of the Companys existing repurchase agreements totaling $757.0 million with Wachovia
and an affiliate of Wachovia.
The first credit agreement consists of a $473.0 million term loan and a $100.0 million
revolving commitment. The facility has a commitment period of two years with a one year extension
option to November 2010, bears interest at pricing over LIBOR, and has eliminated the mark to
market risk as it relates to interest rate spreads that existed under the terms of the repurchase
agreements. The advance rates for this term facility are similar to the advance rates that existed
under the previous repurchase agreements. The $473.0 million term loan component has repayment
provisions which include reducing the outstanding balance to $300.0 million by December 31, 2008.
The outstanding balance under the term component of this facility was $382.7 million at March 31,
2008. The $100.0 million revolving commitment is used to finance new investments and can be
increased to $200.0 million when the term loan is paid down to $400.0 million. The term loan was
paid down to $400.0 million on February 15, 2008. The outstanding balance under the revolving
component of this facility was $44.7 million at March 31, 2008.
18
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
The second credit agreement is a $69.0 million term loan which has a commitment period of two
years with a one year extension option to November 2010 and bears interest at pricing over LIBOR.
This agreement includes $10.0 million of annual repayment provisions in quarterly installments.
The advance rate on this term facility is higher than the advance rate for the collateral that was
in the repurchase agreement and the facility eliminates the mark to market risk as it relates to
interest rate spreads that existed under the terms of the repurchase agreement. The Company has
also pledged its 24% equity interest in Prime Outlets Members, LLC (POM) as part of this
agreement. In the second and third year of this term facility, the Company is required to paydown
this facility by an additional amount equal to distributions in excess of $10.0 million per year
received by the Company from its
investment in POM, if any. The outstanding balance under the term component of this facility
was $64.0 million at March 31, 2008.
Collateralized Debt Obligations
The following table outlines borrowings under the Companys collateralized debt obligations as
of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO I Issued four investment
grade tranches January 19, 2005.
Reinvestment period through April
2009. Interest rate variable based
on three-month LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was 4.51% and
5.48%, respectively |
|
$ |
281,319,000 |
|
|
$ |
283,319,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO II Issued nine investment
grade tranches January 11, 2006.
Reinvestment period through April
2011. Interest is variable based on
three-month LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was 4.51% and
5.58%, respectively |
|
|
346,810,000 |
|
|
|
347,990,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO III Issued 10 investment
grade tranches December 14, 2006.
Reinvestment period through January
2012. Interest is variable based on
three-month LIBOR; the weighted
average note rate was 3.61% and
5.12%, respectively |
|
|
504,700,000 |
|
|
|
519,700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDOs |
|
$ |
1,132,829,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,151,009,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from CDO I and CDO II are distributed quarterly with approximately $2.0 million and
$1.2 million, respectively, being paid to investors as a reduction of the CDO liability.
CDO III has $100.0 million revolving note class that provides a revolving note facility. The
outstanding note balance for CDO III was $504.7 million at March 31, 2008 which included $57.2
million outstanding under the revolving note facility. The outstanding note balance for CDO III
was $519.7 million at December 31, 2007 which included $72.2 million outstanding under the
revolving note facility.
The Company intends to own these portfolios of real estate-related assets until their
maturities and accounts for these transactions on its balance sheet as financing facilities. For
accounting purposes, CDOs are consolidated in the Companys financial statements. The investment
grade tranches are treated as secured financings, and are non-recourse to the Company.
19
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Debt Covenants
Each of the credit facilities contains various financial covenants and restrictions, including
minimum net worth and debt-to-equity ratios. The Company was in compliance with all financial
covenants and restrictions for the periods presented.
Note 7 Minority Interest
On July 1, 2003, ACM contributed $213.1 million of structured finance assets and $169.2
million of borrowings supported by $43.9 million of equity in exchange for a commensurate equity
ownership in ARLP, the Companys operating partnership. This transaction was accounted for as
minority interest in ARLP. In April 2004, the Company issued 6,750,000 shares of its common stock
in an initial public offering and a concurrent offering to one of the Companys directors. In May
2004, the underwriters of the initial public offering exercised a portion of their over-allotment
option, which resulted in the issuance of 524,200 additional shares.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 86,772 shares of common stock,
all of which were payment for ACMs incentive management fee. The increase in the Companys
outstanding shares had a nominal effect on ACMs limited partnership interest in ARLP which was
15.5% at March 31, 2008. Minority interest decreased by $5.4 million to $67.5 million at March 31,
2008 compared to $72.9 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease primarily reflected ACMs
limited partnership interest in the decrease in stockholders equity during the quarter ended March
31, 2008, which was primarily due to a $34.6 million increase in unrealized losses on derivatives
and available-for-sale securities.
ACMs minority interest in ARLP is represented by operating partnership units and is adjusted
at the end of each reporting period to an amount equal to ACMs ownership percentage of ARLPs net
equity. ACM owned approximately 15.5% (3,776,069 units) of ARLP at both March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007. ACM may redeem each of these operating partnership units for cash or, at the
Companys election, each unit may be converted into the Companys common stock on a one-for-one
basis. If the units are redeemed for cash, the redemption price of each unit will equal the fair
market value of one share of common stock, calculated as the average of the daily closing prices
for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the date of determination. The Company
would have paid $59.0 million, or $15.62 per unit, if the units were redeemed for cash at March 31,
2008, compared to $64.6 million, or $17.10 per unit, if the units were redeemed for cash at
December 31, 2007. ACMs redemption rights are subject to certain provisions with respect to
ownership limitations in order for the Company to maintain its REIT status.
Note 8 Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133
which requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets and to measure those instruments at fair value. Additionally, the fair
value adjustments will affect either other comprehensive income in stockholders equity until the
hedged item is recognized in earnings or net income, depending on whether the derivative instrument
qualifies as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity.
In connection with the Companys interest rate risk management, the Company periodically
hedges a portion of its interest rate risk by entering into derivative financial instrument
contracts. The Company has entered into various interest rate swap agreements to hedge its
exposure to interest rate risk on (i) variable rate borrowings as it relates to fixed rate loans;
(ii) the difference between the CDO investor return being based on the three-month LIBOR index
while the supporting assets of the CDO are based on the one-month LIBOR index; and (iii) the
issuance of variable rate junior subordinated notes.
20
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Derivative financial instruments must be effective in reducing the Companys interest rate
risk exposure in order to qualify for hedge accounting. When the terms of an underlying
transaction are modified, or when the underlying hedged item ceases to exist, all changes in the
fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income for
each period until the derivative instrument matures or is settled. Any derivative instrument used
for risk management that does not meet the hedging criteria is marked-to-market with the changes in
value included in net income.
The following is a summary of the derivative financial instruments held by the Company as of
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007: (Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Designation\ |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cash Flow |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualifying |
|
$ |
1,303,631 |
|
|
$ |
1,303,631 |
|
|
|
2009 2015 |
|
|
$ |
2,738 |
|
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying |
|
$ |
898,491 |
|
|
$ |
776,232 |
|
|
|
2008 2017 |
|
|
$ |
(60,542 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of Non-Qualifying Hedges was $2.7 million and $2.5 million as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively, and is recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the change in fair value of the
Non-Qualifying Swaps was $0.2 million and ($0.7) million, respectively and is recorded in interest
expense on the Consolidated Income Statement.
The fair value of Qualifying Cash Flow Hedges as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was
$(60.5) million and $(29.9) million, respectively, and was recorded in other comprehensive loss and
in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of March 31, 2008, the Company expects
to reclassify approximately $(21.6) million of other comprehensive loss from Qualifying Cash Flow
Hedges to interest expense over the next twelve months assuming interest rates on that date are
held constant.
Gains and losses on terminated swaps are being accreted to income over the original life of
the hedging instruments as the hedged item was designated as current and future outstanding LIBOR
based debt, which has an indeterminate life, and the hedged transaction is still more likely than
not to occur. The Company has deferred approximately $1.8 million and $1.9 million of such gains
through other comprehensive income at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The
Company recorded $0.1 million as a reduction to interest expense related to the accretion of these
gains for both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. The Company expects to accrete
approximately $0.3 million of this deferred income to earnings over the next twelve months.
The cumulative amount of other comprehensive loss related to net unrealized losses on
derivatives designated as Cash Flow Hedges as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of $(58.7)
million and $(28.0) million, respectively, is a combination of the fair value of qualifying cash
flow hedges of $(60.5) million and $(29.9) million, respectively, and deferred gains on termination
of interest swaps of $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The remaining portion included
in other comprehensive loss is related to the Companys available for sale securities as discussed
in Note 4 Available For Sale Securities of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 9 Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements for financial assets and
liabilities effective January 1, 2008. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for
measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair
value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements.
Fair value is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current
transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liabilitys fair value is defined as the
amount that would be paid to transfer the
21
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the
creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or
derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available,
valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management
estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the
instruments or market and the instruments complexity.
Assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are categorized based upon the level of
judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined
by SFAS 157 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair
valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The types of assets and liabilities
carried at Level 1 fair value generally are government and agency securities, equities
listed in active markets, investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted
market prices and listed derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly
or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market
data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instruments anticipated life.
Fair valued assets and liabilities that are generally included in this category are
non-government securities, municipal bonds, certain hybrid financial instruments,
certain mortgage and asset backed securities, certain corporate debt, certain
commitments and guarantees, certain private equity investments and certain derivatives. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is
given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the
inputs to the model. Generally, assets and liabilities carried at fair value and
included in this category are certain mortgage and asset-backed securities, certain
corporate debt, certain private equity investments, certain municipal bonds, certain
commitments and guarantees and certain derivatives. |
Determining which category as asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires
significant judgment and the Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter.
The Company measures certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a
recurring basis, including available for sale securities and derivative financial instruments. The
fair value of these financial assets and liabilities was determined using the following inputs as
of March 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Using Fair Value Hierarchy |
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
11,846,043 |
|
|
$ |
11,846,043 |
|
|
$ |
11,846,043 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
2,737,953 |
|
|
|
2,737,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,737,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
60,541,776 |
|
|
|
60,541,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,541,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities: Fair values are approximated on current market quotes received
from financial sources that trade such securities.
Derivative financial instruments: Fair values are approximated on current market quotes
received from financial sources that trade such securities and are based on prevailing market data
and derived from third party
22
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
proprietary models based on well recognized financial principles and reasonable estimates about
relevant future market conditions. These items are included in other assets and other liabilities
on the consolidated balance sheet.
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual Commitments
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had the following material contractual obligations (payments
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual |
|
Payments Due by Period (1) |
|
Obligations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable(2) |
|
$ |
198,116 |
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
359,187 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
599,303 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations (3) |
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
96,493 |
|
|
|
96,493 |
|
|
|
303,470 |
|
|
|
626,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,132,829 |
|
Repurchase
agreements |
|
|
44,463 |
|
|
|
152,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,996 |
|
Trust preferred
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,055 |
|
|
|
276,055 |
|
Outstanding unfunded
commitments (4) |
|
|
63,962 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
7,253 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
126,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
316,081 |
|
|
$ |
334,095 |
|
|
$ |
465,725 |
|
|
$ |
310,723 |
|
|
$ |
628,249 |
|
|
$ |
276,983 |
|
|
$ |
2,331,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents amounts due based on contractual maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
Maturity date for Wachovia term and revolving facilities includes the one year extension option. |
|
(3) |
|
Comprised of $281.3 million of CDO I debt, $346.8 million of CDO II debt and $504.7 million of
CDO III debt with a weighted average remaining maturity of 2.25, 3.70 and 4.23 years,
respectively, as of March 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
In accordance with certain loans and investments, the Company has outstanding unfunded
commitments of $126.7 million as of March 31, 2008, that it is obligated to fund as the
borrowers meet certain requirements. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to,
property renovations, building construction, and building conversions based on criteria met by
the borrower in accordance with the loan agreements. |
Litigation
The Company currently is neither subject to any material litigation nor, to managements
knowledge, is any material litigation currently threatened against the company.
23
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 11 Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
The Companys charter provides for the issuance of up to 500 million shares of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, and 100 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
The Company was incorporated in June 2003 and was initially capitalized through the sale of 67
shares of common stock for $1,005.
The Company paid its incentive compensation management fee to ACM in a combination of cash and
shares of common stock during the first quarter of 2008. The Company issued 86,772 shares of
common stock in February 2008 for the portion of its incentive compensation management fee paid in
common stock.
In 2007, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC under the
1933 Act with respect to an aggregate of $500.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred
stock, depositary shares and warrants, that may be sold by the Company from time to time pursuant
to Rule 415 of the 1933 Act. On April 19, 2007, the Commission declared this shelf registration
statement effective. At March 31, 2008, the Company had $425.3 million available under this shelf
registration.
The Company had 20,606,107 shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 2008 and 20,519,335
shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Deferred Compensation
In April 2008, the Company issued an aggregate of 230,740 shares of restricted common stock
under the stock incentive plan, of which 216,740 shares were awarded to certain employees of the
Company and ACM and 14,000 shares were issued to non-management members of the board of directors.
One fifth of the 216,740 shares of restricted stock granted to each of the employees of the
Company and ACM were vested as of the date of grant, the second one-fifth will vest in April 2009,
the third one-fifth will vest in April 2010, the fourth one-fifth will vest in April 2011, and the
remaining one-fifth will vest in April 2012.
One third of the 14,000 shares of restricted stock granted to each director was vested as of
the date of grant, another one third will vest in April 2009, and the remaining third will vest in
April 2010.
Note 12 Earnings Per Share
Earnings per share (EPS) is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share.
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding during each period inclusive of unvested restricted stock which
participate fully in dividends. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income adjusted for
income allocated to minority interest by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding plus the additional dilutive effect of common stock equivalents during each period.
The Companys common stock equivalents are ARLPs operating partnership units and the potential
settlement of incentive management fees in common stock.
24
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted
earnings per share computations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,704,792 |
|
|
$ |
12,704,792 |
|
|
$ |
16,763,581 |
|
|
$ |
16,763,581 |
|
Add: income allocated to minority
interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,333,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,680,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per EPS calculation |
|
$ |
12,704,792 |
|
|
$ |
15,038,082 |
|
|
$ |
16,763,581 |
|
|
$ |
20,443,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding |
|
|
20,571,780 |
|
|
|
20,571,780 |
|
|
|
17,183,318 |
|
|
|
17,183,318 |
|
Weighted average number of
operating partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,776,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,776,069 |
|
Dilutive effect of incentive
management fee shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
20,571,780 |
|
|
|
24,403,381 |
|
|
|
17,183,318 |
|
|
|
21,029,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13 Related Party Transactions
Due to related party was $2.0 million at March 31, 2008 and consisted of $2.0 million of
management fees that were due to ACM and will be remitted in May 2008. At December 31, 2007, due
to related party was $2.4 million and consisted of $3.2 million of management fees that were due to
ACM and remitted in February 2008, which was partially offset by $0.8 million of extension and
filing fees received by ACM which were remitted to the Company in January 2008.
During 2006, the Company originated a $7.2 million bridge loan and a $0.3 million preferred
equity investment secured by garden-style and townhouse apartments in South Carolina. The Company
also had a 25.0% carried profits interest in the borrowing entity. In January 2008, the borrowing
entity refinanced the property through ACMs Fannie Mae program and the Company received $0.3
million for its profits interest as well as full repayment of the $0.3 million preferred equity
investment and the $7.0 million outstanding balance on the bridge loan. The Company retained the
25% carried profits interest.
In March 2008 ACM purchased from third party investors, investment grade CDO notes issued by
subsidiaries of the Company, with an aggregate face value of $11.5 million for $5.0 million.
The Company is dependent upon its manager (ACM), with whom it has a conflict of interest, to
provide services to the Company that are vital to its operations. The Companys chairman, chief
executive officer and president, Mr. Ivan Kaufman, is also the chief executive officer and
president of ACM, and, the Companys chief financial officer, Mr. Paul Elenio, is the chief
financial officer of ACM. In addition, Mr. Kaufman and the Kaufman entities together beneficially
own approximately 91% of the outstanding membership interests of ACM and certain of the Companys
employees and directors, also hold an ownership interest in ACM. Furthermore, one of the Companys
directors also serves as the trustee of one of the Kaufman entities that holds a majority of the
outstanding membership interests in ACM and co-trustee of another Kaufman entity that owns an
equity interest in ACM. ACM currently holds a 15.5% limited partnership interest in the Companys
operating partnership and 20.1% of the voting power of its outstanding stock.
25
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 14 Distributions
On April 25, 2008, the Company declared distributions of $0.62 per share of common stock,
payable with respect to the three months ended March 31, 2008, to stockholders of record at the
close of business on May 15, 2008. The Company intends to pay these distributions on May 27, 2008.
On January 25, 2008, the Company declared distributions of $0.62 per share of common stock,
payable with respect to the three months ended December 31, 2007, to stockholders of record at the
close of business on February 15, 2008. The Company paid this distribution on February 26, 2008.
In order to satisfy the REIT requirements for distributing taxable income, the Company expects
to make a special dividend distribution in 2008 related to a portion of REIT taxable income earned
in 2007, which is in excess of the amount distributed through the Companys regular, quarterly
dividends.
Note 15 Management Agreement
The Company, ARLP and Arbor Realty SR, Inc. have entered into a management agreement with ACM,
which provides that for performing services under the management agreement, the Company will pay
ACM an incentive compensation fee and base management fee. The incentive compensation fee is
calculated as 25% of the amount by which ARLPs funds from operations exceeds 9.5% return on
invested funds or the Ten Year U.S. Treasury Rate plus 3.5%, whichever is greater, as described in
the management agreement. This fee is subject to recalculation and reconciliation at fiscal year
end in accordance with the management agreement.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded $0.9 million and $0.7
million, respectively, of base management fees due to ACM of which $0.3 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, were included in due to related party and paid in the month subsequent to the
respective periods.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, ACM earned an incentive compensation installment
totaling $1.7 million which was included in due to related party. ACM intends to elect to be paid
its incentive compensation management fee partially in 55,532 shares of common stock with the
remainder to be paid in cash totaling $0.8 million, payable in May 2008. For the three months
ended March 31, 2007, ACM earned an incentive compensation installment totaling $4.2 million and
was paid in 137,873 common shares in May 2007.
Note 16 Due to Borrowers
Due to borrowers represents borrowers funds held by the Company to fund certain expenditures
or to be released at the Companys discretion upon the occurrence of certain pre-specified events,
and to serve as additional collateral for borrowers loans. While retained, these balances earn
interest in accordance with the specific loan terms they are associated with.
26
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
Note 17 Subsequent Events
At March 31, 2008, the Company had a $13.8 million bridge loan secured by a 210 unit
multi-family property located in Tallahassee, Florida that matures in June 2008 and bears interest
at LIBOR plus 2.50% with a LIBOR floor of 3.50%. The Company established a $1.5 million provision
for loan loss related to this property during the fourth quarter of 2007, reducing the carrying
value to $12.3 million at March 31, 2008. In May 2008, the Company received $0.3 million from the
borrower plus a $0.3 million note from the borrower payable in 16 monthly installments, reducing
the carrying amount to $11.7 million. In May 2008, the property was sold for approximately $11.8
million and the Company provided the purchaser with a
$12.8 million loan and investment, of which approximately $11.2 million was funded, with a fixed interest rate of 6.22% and a maturity date in May 2011. The
Company also received a 25% equity participation interest in the property. As a result of this
transaction, the Company will chargeoff $1.5 million against the allowance for loan losses in the
second quarter of 2008. The Company does not expect any potential fees paid from the settlement of
this transaction to result in a material additional loss.
At March 31, 2008, the Company had a $5.0 million mezzanine loan secured by an office building
located in Indianapolis, Indiana that matures in June 2012 and bears interest at a fixed rate of
10.72%. The Company established a $1.5 million provision for loan loss during the first quarter of
2008 related to this property reducing the carrying value to $3.5 million at March 31, 2008. In
April 2008, the Company was the winning bidder at a UCC foreclosure sale of the entity which owns
the equity interest in the property securing this loan and a $41.4 million first mortgage on the
property.
The Company has a $70.4 million bridge loan on a land development project in New York City
located at 303 East 51st Street. This loan has an initial maturity date of May 2008
with one six month extension option and an interest rate of Libor plus 4.25% with a Libor floor of
5.32%. On March 15, 2008, there was a tragic construction accident related to the development of
this project and a stop work order has been issued by the city for an undeterminable amount of
time. As a result, effective April 1, 2008, the Company will not record interest income on this
loan until it is received. The property did not sustain significant damage. The principal amount
of this loan is not deemed to be impaired at this time and no loan loss reserve has been recorded
to date. On May 1, 2008, the Company entered into agreements
with the borrower, pursuant to which the Company received a $450,000
cash payment which was applied to the
interest and agreed to defer payments until July 1, 2008. In addition, the
borrower acknowledged the Companys right to directly receive and apply
insurance proceeds as they may be received. The Company received $100,000 on
May 7, 2008.
27
Item 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements, and related notes included herein.
Overview
We are a Maryland corporation that was formed in June 2003 to invest in multi-family and
commercial real estate-related bridge loans, junior participating interests in first mortgages,
mezzanine loans, preferred and direct equity and, in limited cases, discounted mortgage notes and
other real estate-related assets, which we refer to collectively as structured finance investments.
We have also invested in mortgage-related securities. We conduct substantially all of our
operations through our operating partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Our operating performance is primarily driven by the following factors:
|
|
|
Net interest income earned on our investments Net interest income
represents the amount by which the interest income earned on our
assets exceeds the interest expense incurred on our borrowings. If
the yield earned on our assets increases or the cost of borrowings
decreases, this will have a positive impact on earnings. Net interest
income is also directly impacted by the size of our asset portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
Credit quality of our assets Effective asset and portfolio
management is essential to maximizing the performance and value of a
real estate/mortgage investment. Maintaining the credit quality of our
loans and investments is of critical importance. Loans that do not
perform in accordance with their terms may have a negative impact on
earnings. |
|
|
|
|
Cost control We seek to minimize our operating costs, which consist
primarily of employee compensation and related costs, management fees
and other general and administrative expenses. As the size of the
portfolio increases, certain of these expenses, particularly employee
compensation expenses, may increase. |
We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust
(REIT) for federal income tax purposes. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on
its REITtaxable income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes at
least 90% of its REITtaxable income and meets certain other requirements. Certain of our assets
that produce non-qualifying income are owned by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, the income of which
are subject to federal and state income taxes. During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007, we recorded a $0 and $6.1 million, respectively, provision for income taxes related to the
assets that are held in taxable REIT subsidiaries.
Sources of Operating Revenues
We derive our operating revenues primarily through interest received from making real
estate-related bridge and mezzanine loans and preferred equity investments. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, interest income earned on these loans and investments represented
approximately 99% and 76% of our total revenues, respectively.
Interest income may also be derived from profits of equity participation interests. For the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, interest on these investments represented less than 1%
and approximately 24% of our total revenues, respectively.
Additionally, we derive operating revenues from other income that represents loan structuring
and miscellaneous asset management fees associated with our loans and investments portfolio. For
both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, revenue from other income represented less
than 1% of our total revenues.
28
Income from Equity Affiliates and Gain on Sale of Loans and Real Estate
We derive income from equity affiliates relating to joint ventures that were formed with
equity partners to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate assets. These joint ventures are not
majority owned or controlled by us, and are not consolidated in our financial statements. These
investments are recorded under either the equity or cost method of accounting as appropriate. We
record our share of net income and losses from the underlying properties on a single line item in
the consolidated income statements as income from equity affiliates. We did not recognize any
income or losses from equity affiliates for both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
We also may derive income from the gain on sale of loans and real estate. We may acquire (1)
real estate for our own investment and, upon stabilization, disposition at an anticipated return
and (2) real estate notes generally at a discount from lenders in situations where the borrower
wishes to restructure and reposition its short term debt and the lender wishes to divest certain
assets from its portfolio. No such income has been recorded to date.
Critical Accounting Policies
Please refer to the section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies for a discussion
of our critical accounting policies. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, there were no
material changes to these policies, except for the updates described below.
Revenue Recognition
Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis as it is earned from loans, investments and
available-for-sale securities. In many instances, the borrower pays an additional amount of
interest at the time the loan is closed, an origination fee, and deferred interest upon maturity.
In some cases, interest income may also include the amortization or accretion of premiums and
discounts arising at the loan purchase or origination. This additional income, net of any direct
loan origination costs incurred, is deferred and accreted into interest income on an effective
yield or interest method adjusted for actual prepayment activity over the life of the related
loan or available-for-sale security as a yield adjustment. Income recognition is suspended for
loans when in the opinion of management a full recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful.
Income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is
demonstrated to be resumed. Several of the loans provide for accrual of interest at specified
rates, which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the
accrual rate subject to managements determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal
are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If
management cannot make this determination regarding collectibility, interest income above the
current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt. Additionally, interest income is recorded
when earned from equity participation interests, referred to as equity kickers. These equity
kickers have the potential to generate additional revenues to us as a result of excess cash flows
being distributed and/or as appreciated properties are sold or refinanced. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded $0.3 million and $16.8 million of interest on such loans
and investments, respectively.
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the carrying values of interest rate swaps and the underlying
hedged liabilities are reflected at their fair value. As of December 31, 2007 we retained the
services of Chatham Financial Corporation, a Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70 (SAS 70),
Service Organizations compliant, third party financial services company to determine these fair
values. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are either offset against the change in the
fair value of the hedged liability through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income
(loss) until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivatives
change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives that do not qualify for
cash flow hedge accounting treatment are adjusted to fair value through earnings.
29
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we entered into six additional interest rate
swaps that qualify as cash flow hedges, having a total combined notional value of approximately
$121.6 million. The fair value of our qualifying hedge portfolio has decreased by approximately
$30.7 million from December 31, 2007 as a result of these additional swaps and a change in the
projected LIBOR rates.
Because the valuations of our hedging activities are based on estimates, the fair value may
change if our estimates are inaccurate. For the effect of hypothetical changes in market interest
rates on our interest rate swaps, see Interest Rate Risk in Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk, set forth in Item 7A hereof.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of the impact of new accounting pronouncements on our financial condition or
results of operations, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth
in Item 1 hereof.
Changes in Financial Condition
Our loan portfolio balance at March 31, 2008 was $2.6 billion, with a weighted average current
interest pay rate of 7.56% as compared to $2.6 billion, with a weighted average current interest
pay rate of 8.18% at December 31, 2007. At March 31, 2008, advances on financing facilities
totaled $2.2 billion, with a weighted average funding cost of 4.79% as compared to $2.3 billion,
with a weighted average funding cost of 6.16% at December 31, 2007.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we originated six loans and investments totaling
$121.6 million, of which three were bridge loans totaling $71.8 million, two were mezzanine loans
totaling $14.8 million, and one was a junior participating interest totaling $35.0 million. During
the quarter, six loans paid off on properties that were either sold or refinanced by a third party
with an outstanding balance of $86.0 million, two loans partially repaid totaling $78.9 million and
five loans were either refinanced or modified during the quarter totaling $118.7 million, of which
three loans totaling $73.7 million were scheduled to repay during the quarter. In addition, six
loans totaling approximately $154.6 million were extended during the quarter in accordance with the
extension options of the corresponding loan agreements.
Restricted cash decreased $62.5 million, or 45%, to $76.6 million at March 31, 2008 compared
to $139.1 million at December 31, 2007. Restricted cash is kept on deposit with the trustees for
our collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), and primarily represents proceeds from loan
repayments which will be used to purchase replacement loans as collateral for the CDOs. The
decrease was primarily due to the redeployment of funds during the first quarter from proceeds
received near the end of 2007 from the full satisfaction of loans held in the CDO and the transfer
of loans from other financing facilities to the CDOs.
Other assets increased $11.3 million, or 13%, to $95.0 million at March 31, 2008 compared to
$83.7 million at December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily due to funding additional cash
collateral for a portion of our interest rate swaps whose value has declined as a result of
reductions in the LIBOR rate. See Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk for further information relating to our derivatives.
Other liabilities increased $23.3 million, or 35%, from $67.4 million at December 31, 2007
compared to $90.7 million at March 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to a $30.7 million
increase in unrealized losses on the fair value of our interest rate swaps, due to a reduction in
LIBOR rates, with a corresponding offset to other comprehensive loss. This increase was partially
offset by a $5.0 million decrease in accrued interest payable primarily due to a reduction in LIBOR
rates and a decline in the outstanding balance of our financing facilities.
In April 2008, 14,000 restricted shares were issued to non-management members of the board of
directors under the stock incentive plan. One third of the restricted stock granted was vested as
of the date of grant, another one third will vest in April 2009, and the remaining third will vest
in April 2010.
30
In April 2008, we issued 216,740 shares of restricted common stock under the stock incentive
plan to certain employees of ours and ACM. One fifth of the restricted stock granted to each of
these employees were
vested as of the date of grant, the second one-fifth will vest in April 2009, the third
one-fifth will vest in April 2010, the fourth one-fifth will vest in April 2011, and the remaining
one-fifth will vest in April 2012. After giving effect to these transactions, we had 20,836,847
shares outstanding. Furthermore, in May 2008, ACM will be paid a portion of its first quarter 2008
incentive management fee in 55,532 shares of common stock.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
55,416,330 |
|
|
$ |
66,460,653 |
|
|
$ |
(11,044,323 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Other income |
|
|
20,693 |
|
|
|
6,170 |
|
|
|
14,523 |
|
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
55,437,023 |
|
|
|
66,466,823 |
|
|
|
(11,029,800 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
31,304,099 |
|
|
|
32,112,519 |
|
|
|
(808,420 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
1,977,343 |
|
|
|
1,730,355 |
|
|
|
246,988 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Selling and administrative |
|
|
1,538,066 |
|
|
|
1,221,372 |
|
|
|
316,694 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
nm |
Management fee related party |
|
|
2,579,433 |
|
|
|
4,873,682 |
|
|
|
(2,294,249 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
40,398,941 |
|
|
|
39,937,928 |
|
|
|
461,013 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income from equity affiliates,
minority interest and provision for income
taxes |
|
|
15,038,082 |
|
|
|
26,528,895 |
|
|
|
(11,490,813 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
Income from equity affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and provision
for income taxes |
|
|
15,038,082 |
|
|
|
26,528,895 |
|
|
|
(11,490,813 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
Income allocated to minority interest |
|
|
2,333,290 |
|
|
|
3,680,314 |
|
|
|
(1,347,024 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
12,704,792 |
|
|
|
22,848,581 |
|
|
|
(10,143,789 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
)% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,085,000 |
|
|
|
(6,085,000 |
) |
|
nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,704,792 |
|
|
$ |
16,763,581 |
|
|
$ |
(4,058,789 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm not meaningful
Revenue
Interest income decreased $11.0 million, or 17%, to $55.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 from $66.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease was due
in part to the recognition of $0.3 million of interest income for the three months ended March 31,
2008 from a 25.0% carried profits interest in a $0.3 million preferred equity investment as
compared to the recognition of $16.0 million of interest income for the three months ended March
31, 2007 from a 33.33% carried profits interest in a $2.0 million preferred equity investment.
31
Excluding these transactions, interest income increased $4.6 million, or 9%, compared to the
same period of the prior year. This increase was primarily due to a 26% increase in the average
balance of loans and investments from $2.0 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to
$2.6 billion for the three months ended March 31,
2008 due to increased loan and investment originations. This was partially offset by a 14%
decrease in the average yield on the assets from 9.68% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to
8.35% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This decrease in yield was the result of a
decrease in LIBOR over the same period and a reduction in the yield on new originations compared to
higher yielding loan payoffs from the same period in 2007.
Other income increased $14,523 to $20,693 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from
$6,170 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. This is primarily due to increased miscellaneous
asset management fees on our loan and investment portfolio.
Expenses
Interest expense decreased $0.8 million, or 3%, to $31.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 compared to $32.1 million the three months ended March 31, 2007. This decrease was
primarily due to an 18% decrease in the average cost of these borrowings from 6.89% for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 to 5.64% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to a reduction
in average LIBOR over the same period. This was partially offset by an 18% increase in the average
balance of our debt facilities from $1.9 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2007 to $2.2
billion for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as a result of increased portfolio growth and
financing facilities.
Employee compensation and benefits expense increased $0.3 million, or 14%, to $2.0 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 from $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
This increase was primarily due to the expansion of staffing needs in the areas of asset
management, structured securitization and originations associated with the growth of the business
and increased size of our portfolio as well a restricted stock awards granted to employees in April
2007. These expenses represent salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation related to employees,
and incentive compensation for those employed by us during these periods.
Selling and administrative expense increased $0.3 million, or 26%, to $1.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Theses costs include, but are not limited to, professional and consulting fees, marketing costs,
insurance expense, directors fees, licensing fees, travel and placement fees, and stock-based
compensation relating to the cost of restricted stock granted to our directors and certain
employees of our manager. The increase is primarily due $0.2 million of losses recognized from the
sale of property securing the Lake in the Woods bridge loan. See Note 3 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 1 hereof for further details on this
transaction. In addition, we also experienced increases in professional fees, including legal,
accounting services, and consulting fees relating to investor relations, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance
and regulatory filings.
Provision for loan losses totaled $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
there was no provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The provision
recorded was based on our normal quarterly loan review at March 31, 2008, where it was determined
that two multi-family loans and an office building loan with an aggregate outstanding principal
balance of $70.2 million became impaired during the quarter. We performed an evaluation of the
loans and determined that the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the impaired loans
was less than the net carrying value of the loan resulting in us recording a $3.0 million provision
for loan losses.
Management fees decreased $2.3 million, or 47%, to $2.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 from $4.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. These amounts
represent compensation in the form of base management fees and incentive compensation management
fees as provided for in the management agreement with our manager. The base management fee expense
increased by $0.2 million, or 33%, to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. This increase is primarily due
to increased stockholders equity directly attributable to greater undistributed profits and
capital raised from the June 2007 public offering of our common stock. The incentive compensation
management fee expense decreased by $2.5 million, or 60%, to $1.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 from $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease was
due to decreased profitability
32
over the same period as a result of the recognition of $16.0 million
of revenue attributable to the 33.33% profits interest in a borrowing entity during the three
months ended March 31, 2007.
Income From Equity Affiliates
We did not recognize income from equity affiliates for both the three months ended March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2007.
Income Allocated to Minority Interest
Income allocated to minority interest decreased $1.3 million, or 37%, to $2.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
These amounts represent the portion of our income allocated to our manager. This decrease was
primarily due to a 26% decrease in income before minority interest reduced by the provision for
income taxes over the same periods and a decrease in our managers limited partnership interest in
us. Our manager had a weighted average limited partnership interest of 15.5% in our operating
partnership for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to 18.0% for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. At March 31, 2008, our manager had a limited partnership interest of 15.5% in our
operating partnership.
Provision for Income Taxes
We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes. As a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income tax on our REITtaxable
income that we distribute to our stockholders, provided that we distribute at least 90% of our
REITtaxable income and meet certain other requirements. As of March 31, 2008 and 2007, we were
in compliance with all REIT requirements and, therefore, have not provided for income tax expense
on our REIT taxable income for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
Certain of our assets that produce non-qualifying income are owned by our taxable REIT
subsidiaries, the income of which are subject to federal and state income taxes. During the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded a $0 and $6.1 million provision, respectively, on
income from these taxable REIT subsidiaries. The provision for the three months ended March 31,
2007 resulted from a $16.0 million distribution received during the quarter ended March 31, 2007
representing the portion attributable to the 33.33% profits interest in a borrowing entity.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Liquidity is a measurement of the ability to meet potential cash requirements. Our short-term
and long-term liquidity needs include ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund future loans
and investments, fund operating costs and distributions to our stockholders as well as other
general business needs. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of proceeds from equity
offerings, debt facilities and cash flows from operations. Our equity sources consist of funds
raised from our private equity offering in July 2003, net proceeds from our initial public offering
of our common stock in April 2004, net proceeds from our public offering of our common stock in
June 2007 and depending on market conditions, proceeds from capital market transactions including
the future issuance of common, convertible and/or preferred equity securities. Our debt facilities
include the issuance of floating rate notes resulting from our CDOs, the issuance of junior
subordinated notes to subsidiary trusts issuing preferred securities and borrowings under credit
agreements. Net cash provided by operating activities include interest income from our loan and
investment portfolio reduced by interest expense on our debt facilities, cash from equity
participation interests, repayments of outstanding loans and investments and funds from junior loan
participation arrangements.
We believe our existing sources of funds will be adequate for purposes of meeting our
short-term and long-term liquidity needs. Our loans and investments are financed under existing
credit facilities and their credit status is
33
continuously monitored; therefore, these loans and
investments are expected to generate a generally stable return. Our ability to meet our long-term
liquidity and capital resource requirements is subject to obtaining additional debt and equity
financing. If we are unable to renew our sources of financing on substantially similar terms or at
all, it
would have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Any decision by our
lenders and investors to enter into such transactions with us will depend upon a number of factors,
such as our financial performance, compliance with the terms of our existing credit arrangements,
industry or market trends, the general availability of and rates applicable to financing
transactions, such lenders and investors resources and policies concerning the terms under which
they make such capital commitments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or
lending opportunities.
To maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually
at least 90% of our REITtaxable income. These distribution requirements limit our ability to
retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital for operations. However, we believe that
our capital resources and access to financing will provide us with financial flexibility and market
responsiveness at levels sufficient to meet current and anticipated capital requirements, including
expected new lending and investment opportunities.
Equity Offerings
Our authorized capital provides for the issuance of up to 500 million shares of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, and 100 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
In March 2007, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC under the 1933
Act with respect to an aggregate of $500.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred
stock, depositary shares and warrants, that may be sold by us from time to time pursuant to Rule
415 of the 1933 Act. On April 19, 2007, the Commission declared this shelf registration statement
effective.
In June 2007, we sold 2,700,000 shares of our common stock registered on the shelf
registration statement in a public offering at a price of $27.65 per share, for net proceeds of
approximately $73.6 million after deducting the underwriting discount and the other estimated
offering expenses. We used the proceeds to pay down debt and finance our loan and investment
portfolio. The underwriters did not exercise their over allotment option for additional shares.
At March 31, 2008, we had $425.3 million available under this shelf registration and 20,606,107
shares outstanding.
Debt Facilities
We also maintain liquidity through two term credit agreements, one of which has a revolving
credit component, two master repurchase agreements, one working capital facility, and one bridge
loan warehousing credit agreement with four different financial institutions. In addition, we have
issued three collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and nine separate junior subordinated notes.
London inter-bank offered rate, or LIBOR, refers to one-month LIBOR unless specifically stated. As
of March 31, 2008, these facilities had an aggregate capacity of $2.5 billion and borrowings were
approximately $2.2 billion.
The following is a summary of our debt facilities as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Debt Facilities |
|
Commitment |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Available |
|
|
Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
agreements.
Interest is
variable based on
pricing over LIBOR |
|
$ |
244,463,318 |
|
|
$ |
196,995,819 |
|
|
$ |
47,467,499 |
|
|
|
2008 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt
obligations.
Interest is
variable based on
pricing over
three-month
LIBOR |
|
|
1,175,629,000 |
|
|
|
1,132,829,000 |
|
|
|
42,800,000 |
|
|
|
2011 2013 |
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Debt Facilities |
|
Commitment |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Available |
|
|
Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
notes. Interest is
variable based on
pricing over
three-month LIBOR |
|
|
276,055,000 |
|
|
|
276,055,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2034 2037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable.
Interest is
variable based on
pricing over Prime
or LIBOR |
|
|
796,749,999 |
|
|
|
599,303,222 |
|
|
|
197,446,777 |
|
|
|
2008 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,492,897,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,205,183,041 |
|
|
$ |
287,714,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These debt facilities are described in further detail in Note 6 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 1 hereof.
Repurchase Agreements
Repurchase obligation financings provide us with a revolving component to our debt structure.
Repurchase agreements provide stand alone financing for certain assets and interim, or warehouse
financing, for assets that we plan to contribute to our CDOs. At March 31, 2008, the aggregate
outstanding balance under these facilities was $197.0 million.
We have a $200.0 million repurchase agreement with a financial institution, effective October
2006, which was amended in December 2007 to increase the committed amount of the facility to $200.0
million from $150.0 million. The agreement has a term expiring in October 2009 and bears interest
at pricing over LIBOR, varying on the type of asset financed. At March 31, 2008, the outstanding
balance under this facility was $152.5 million with a current weighted average note rate of 3.79%.
We have a $100.0 million repurchase agreement with a second financial institution that was
amended in September 2007 from a $50.0 million warehouse credit facility. The amendment changed
the form of the warehouse credit facility to a repurchase agreement, increased the committed amount
of the facility to $100.0 million, and extended the maturity date to September 2008. The
repurchase agreement facility bears interest at pricing over LIBOR. In January 2008, we were
notified that no further advances could be taken under this facility. The facility matures in
September 2008 and under the terms of the repurchase agreement the facility will be paid in its
entirety by December 2008. At March 31, 2008, the outstanding balance under this facility was
$44.5 million with a current weighted average note rate of 4.68%.
We had a $100.0 million master repurchase agreement with Nomura Credit and Capital, Inc. that
expired in December 2007. We exercised our right under the repurchase agreement to extend the
repayment date until June 2008. No further advances were permitted under the agreement. This
repurchase agreement bore interest at pricing over LIBOR, varying on the type of asset financed.
This facility was repaid in its entirety in February 2008.
CDOs
We completed three separate CDOs since 2005 by issuing to third party investors, tranches of
investment grade collateralized debt obligations through newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries
(the Issuers). The Issuers hold assets, consisting primarily of real-estate related assets and
cash which serve as collateral for the CDOs. The assets pledged as collateral for the CDOs were
contributed from our existing portfolio of assets. By contributing these real estate assets to the
various CDOs, these transactions resulted in a decreased cost of funds relating to the
corresponding CDO assets and created capacity in our existing credit facilities.
The Issuers issued tranches of investment grade floating-rate notes of approximately $305.0
million, $356.0 million and $447.5 million for CDO I, CDO II and CDO III, respectively. CDO III
also has a $100.0 million revolving note which was not drawn upon at the time of issuance. The
revolving note facility has a commitment fee of 0.22% per annum on the undrawn portion of the
facility. The tranches were issued with floating rate coupons based on three-month LIBOR plus
pricing of 0.44% 0.77%. Proceeds from the sale of the investment grade tranches issued in CDO I,
CDO II and CDO III of $267.0 million, $301.0 million and $317.1 million, respectively, were used to
repay higher costing outstanding debt under our repurchase agreements and notes payable. The CDOs
may be replenished with substitute collateral for loans that are repaid during the first four years
for CDO I and the
35
first five years for CDO II and CDO III, subject to certain customary provisions.
Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Proceeds from the
repayment of assets which serve as collateral for the CDOs must be retained in its structure as
restricted cash until such collateral can be replaced and therefore not
available to fund current cash needs. If such cash is not used to replenish collateral, it
could have a negative impact on our anticipated returns. Proceeds from CDO I and CDO II are
distributed quarterly with approximately $2.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, being paid to
investors as a reduction of the CDO liability. For accounting purposes, CDOs are consolidated in
our financial statements.
At March 31, 2008, the outstanding note balance under CDO I, CDO II and CDO III was $281.3
million, $346.8 million and $504.7 million, respectively.
The recent turmoil in the structured finance markets, in particular the sub-prime residential
loan market, has negatively impacted the credit markets generally, and, as a result, investor
demand for commercial real estate collateralized debt obligations has been substantially curtailed.
In recent years, we have relied to a substantial extent on CDO financings to obtain match funded
financing for our investments. Until the market for commercial real estate CDOs recovers, we may
be unable to utilize CDOs to finance our investments and we may need to utilize less favorable
sources of financing to finance our investments on a long-term basis. There can be no assurance as
to when demand for commercial real estate CDOs will return or the terms of such securities
investors will demand or whether we will be able to issue CDOs to finance our investments on terms
beneficial to us.
Junior Subordinated Notes
The junior subordinated notes are unsecured, have a maturity of 29 to 30 years, pay interest
quarterly at a floating rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR and, absent the occurrence of
special events, are not redeemable during the first five years. At March 31, 2008, the aggregate
outstanding balance under these facilities was $276.1 million with a current weighted average note
rate of 7.36%.
Notes Payable
Notes payable consists of two term credit agreements, a revolving credit line, a working
capital facility, and a bridge loan warehousing credit agreement. At March 31, 2008, the aggregate
outstanding balance under these facilities was $599.3 million.
In June 2007, we entered into a $60.0 million working capital facility with Wachovia. This
facility has a maturity date of June 2008, with two one year extension options, and bears interest
at pricing over one-month LIBOR. At March 31, 2008, the aggregate outstanding balance under this
facility was $47.9 million with a current weighted average note rate of 4.87%. We currently expect
to renew this facility for the first of the two one year renewal options.
In November 2007, we entered in two new credit agreements with Wachovia which replaced two of
our existing repurchase agreements totaling $757.0 million with Wachovia and an affiliate of
Wachovia. The outstanding balance under these two repurchase agreements totaled approximately
$542.0 million at the time the repurchase agreements were replaced. The first credit agreement
consists of a $473.0 million term loan and a $100.0 million revolving commitment and the second
credit agreement is a $69.0 million term loan. These two new credit agreements each provide us
with a commitment period of two years with a one year extension option to November 2010, bear
interest at pricing over LIBOR, and have eliminated the mark to market risk as it relates to
interest rate spreads that existed under the terms of the repurchase agreements.
The $473.0 million term loan has repayment provisions which included reducing the outstanding
balance to $425.0 million by December 31, 2007 and also requires a further reduction of the
outstanding balance to $300.0 million by December 31, 2008. The advance rates for this term
facility are similar to the advance rates that existed under the previous repurchase agreements.
At March 31, 2008, the outstanding balance under this facility was $382.7 million with a current
weighted average note rate of 5.17%. The $100.0 million revolving commitment is used to finance
new investments and can be increased to $200.0 million when the term loan is paid down to $400.0
million. The term loan was paid down to $400.0 million on February 15, 2008. At March 31, 2008,
the outstanding balance under this revolving facility was $44.7 million with a current weighted
average note rate of 5.17%.
36
The $69.0 million term loan includes $10.0 million of annual repayment provisions in quarterly
installments. The advance rate on this term facility is higher than the advance rate for the
collateral that was in the
repurchase agreement and eliminates the mark to market risk as it relates to interest rate
spreads that existed under the terms of the repurchase agreement. We have also pledged our 24%
equity interest in Prime Outlets Members, LLC (POM) as part of the agreement. In the second and
third year of this term facility, we will be required to paydown this facility by an additional
amount equal to distributions in excess of $10.0 million per year received by us from our
investment in POM, if any. At March 31, 2008, the outstanding balance under this facility was
$64.0 million with a current weighted average note rate of 5.28%.
We have a $90.0 million bridge loan warehousing credit agreement with a fourth financial
institution, effective June 2005, to provide financing for bridge loans. This agreement bears a
variable rate of interest, payable monthly, based on Prime plus 0% or pricing over 1, 2, 3 or
6-month LIBOR, at our option. In October 2007, this facility was amended to extend the maturity
date to October 2008 and increase the amount of available financing from $75.0 million to $90.0
million. At March 31, 2008, the outstanding balance under this facility was $60.0 million with a
current weighted average note rate of 5.26%.
The working capital facility, bridge loan warehousing credit agreement, term and revolving
credit agreements, and the master repurchase agreements require that we pay interest monthly, based
on pricing over LIBOR. The amount of our pricing over these rates varies depending upon the
structure of the loan or investment financed pursuant to the specific agreement.
The working capital facility, term and revolving credit agreements, bridge loan warehousing
credit agreement, and the master repurchase agreements require that we pay down borrowings under
these facilities pro-rata as principal payments on our loans and investments are received. In
addition, if upon maturity of a loan or investment we decide to grant the borrower an extension
option, the financial institutions have the option to extend the borrowings or request payment in
full on the outstanding borrowings of the loan or investment extended. The financial institutions
also have the right to request immediate payment of any outstanding borrowings on any loan or
investment that is at least 60 days delinquent.
Cash Flow From Operations
We continually monitor our cash position to determine the best use of funds to both maximize
our return on funds and maintain an appropriate level of liquidity. Historically, in order to
maximize the return on our funds, cash generated from operations has generally been used to
temporarily pay down borrowings under credit facilities whose primary purpose is to fund our new
loans and investments. When making distributions, we have borrowed the required funds by drawing
on credit capacity available under our credit facilities. To date, all distributions have been
funded in this manner. All funds borrowed to make distributions have been repaid by funds
generated from operations. However, in order to maintain adequate liquidity within our credit
facilities for their primary purpose of funding our new loans and investments, we may begin to
accumulate cash generated from operations to make the distributions.
Restrictive Covenants
Each of the credit facilities contains various financial covenants and restrictions, including
minimum net worth and debt-to-equity ratios. In addition to the financial terms and capacities
described above, our credit facilities generally contain covenants that prohibit us from effecting
a change in control, disposing of or encumbering assets being financed and restrict us from making
any material amendment to our underwriting guidelines without approval of the lender. If we
violate these covenants in any of our credit facilities, we could be required to repay all or a
portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing
for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Violations of these covenants may result in our
being unable to borrow unused amounts under our credit facilities, even if repayment of some or all
borrowings is not required. As of March 31, 2008, we are in compliance with all covenants and
restrictions under these credit facilities.
37
Contractual Commitments
As of March 31, 2008, we had the following material contractual obligations (payments in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period (1) |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations |
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable(2) |
|
$ |
198,116 |
|
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
359,187 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
599,303 |
|
Collateralized debt
obligations (3) |
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
96,493 |
|
|
|
96,493 |
|
|
|
303,470 |
|
|
|
626,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,132,829 |
|
Repurchase
agreements |
|
|
44,463 |
|
|
|
152,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,996 |
|
Trust preferred
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,055 |
|
|
|
276,055 |
|
Outstanding unfunded
commitments (4) |
|
|
63,962 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
|
|
10,045 |
|
|
|
7,253 |
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
126,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals. |
|
$ |
316,081 |
|
|
$ |
334,095 |
|
|
$ |
465,725 |
|
|
$ |
310,723 |
|
|
$ |
628,249 |
|
|
$ |
276,983 |
|
|
$ |
2,331,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents amounts due based on contractual maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
Maturity date for Wachovia term and revolving facilities includes the one year extension option. |
|
(3) |
|
Comprised of $281.3 million of CDO I debt, $346.8 million of CDO II debt and $504.7 million of
CDO III debt with a weighted average remaining maturity of 2.25, 3.70 and 4.23 years,
respectively, as of March 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
In accordance with certain loans and investments, we have outstanding unfunded commitments of
$126.7 million as of March 31, 2008, that we are obligated to fund as the borrowers meet
certain requirements. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to, property
renovations, building construction, and building conversions based on criteria met by the
borrower in accordance with the loan agreements. |
Management Agreement
Base Management Fees. In exchange for the services that ACM provides us pursuant to the
management agreement, we pay our manager a monthly base management fee in an amount equal to:
|
(1) |
|
0.75% per annum of the first $400 million of our operating partnerships
equity (equal to the month-end value computed in accordance with GAAP of total
partners equity in our operating partnership, plus or minus any unrealized gains,
losses or other items that do not affect realized net income), |
|
|
(2) |
|
0.625% per annum of our operating partnerships equity between $400 million
and $800 million, and |
|
|
(3) |
|
0.50% per annum of our operating partnerships equity in excess of $800
million. |
The base management fee is not calculated based on the managers performance or the types of
assets its selects for investment on our behalf, but it is affected by the performance of these
assets because it is based on the value of our operating partnerships equity. We incurred $0.9
million and $0.7 million in base management fees for services rendered in the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Incentive Compensation. Pursuant to the management agreement, our manager is also entitled to
receive incentive compensation in an amount equal to:
|
(1) |
|
25% of the amount by which: |
38
|
(a) |
|
our operating partnerships funds from operations per operating
partnership unit, adjusted for certain gains and losses, exceeds |
|
|
(b) |
|
the product of (x) the greater of 9.5% per annum or the Ten Year U.S.
Treasury Rate plus 3.5%, and (y) the weighted average of (i) $15.00,
(ii) the offering price per share of our common stock (including any
shares of common stock issued upon exercise of warrants or options) in
any subsequent offerings (adjusted for any prior capital dividends or
distributions), and (iii) the issue price per operating partnership
unit for subsequent contributions to our operating partnership,
multiplied by |
|
(2) |
|
the weighted average of our operating partnerships outstanding operating
partnership units. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, our manager earned a total of $1.7 million of
incentive compensation and intends to elect to receive it in 55,532 shares of common stock with the
remainder to be paid in cash totaling $0.8 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, our
manager earned a total of $4.2 million of incentive compensation and received it in 137,873 shares
of common stock.
We pay the annual incentive compensation in four installments, each within 60 days of the end
of each fiscal quarter. The calculation of each installment is based on results for the 12 months
ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter for which the installment is payable. These
installments of the annual incentive compensation are subject to recalculation and potential
reconciliation at the end of such fiscal year. Subject to the ownership limitations in our
charter, at least 25% of this incentive compensation is payable to our manager in shares of our
common stock having a value equal to the average closing price per share for the last 20 days of
the fiscal quarter for which the incentive compensation is being paid.
The incentive compensation is accrued as it is earned. In accordance with Issue 4(b) of EITF
96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or
in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services, the expense incurred for incentive compensation
paid in common stock is determined using the valuation method described above and the quoted market
price of our common stock on the last day of each quarter. At December 31 of each year, we
remeasure the incentive compensation paid to our manager in the form of common stock in accordance
with Issue 4(a) of EITF 96-18 which discusses how to measure at the measurement date when certain
terms are not known prior to the measurement date. Accordingly, the expense recorded for such
common stock is adjusted to reflect the fair value of the common stock on the measurement date when
the final calculation of the annual incentive compensation is determined. In the event that the
annual incentive compensation calculated as of the measurement date is less than the four quarterly
installments of the annual incentive compensation paid in advance, our manager will refund the
amount of such overpayment in cash and we would record a negative incentive compensation expense in
the quarter when such overpayment is determined.
Origination Fees. Our manager is entitled to 100% of the origination fees paid by borrowers
on all loans and investments that do not exceed 1% of the loans principal amount. We retain 100%
of the origination fee that exceeds 1% of the loans principal amount.
Term and Termination. The management agreement had an initial term of two years and is
renewable automatically for an additional one year period every year unless terminated with six
months prior written notice. If we terminate or elect not to renew the management agreement in
order to manage our portfolio internally, we are required to pay a termination fee equal to the
base management fee and incentive compensation for the 12-month period preceding the termination.
If, without cause, we terminate or elect not to renew the management agreement for any other
reason, including a change of control of us, we are required to pay a termination fee equal to two
times the base management fee and incentive compensation paid for the 12-month period preceding the
termination.
Related Party Transactions
Due to related party was $2.0 million at March 31, 2008 and consisted of $2.0 million of
management fees that were due to ACM which will be remitted in May 2008. At December 31, 2007, due
to related party was $2.4 million and consisted of $3.2 million of management fees that were due to
ACM and remitted in February 2008,
which was partially offset by $0.8 million of extension and filing fees received by ACM which
were remitted to us in February 2008.
39
During 2006, we originated a $7.2 million bridge loan and a $0.3 million preferred equity
investment secured by garden-style and townhouse apartments in South Carolina. We also had a 25.0%
carried profits interest in the borrowing entity. In January 2008, the borrowing entity refinanced
the property through ACMs Fannie Mae program and we received $0.3 million for our profits interest
as well as full repayment of the $0.3 million preferred equity investment and the $7.0 million
outstanding balance on the bridge loan. We retained the 25% carried profits interest.
In March 2008 ACM purchased from third party investors, investment grade CDO notes issued by
certain of our subsidiaries, with an aggregate face value of $11.5 million for $5.0 million.
We are dependent upon our manager (ACM), with whom we have a conflict of interest, to provide
services to us that are vital to our operations. Our chairman, chief executive officer and
president, Mr. Ivan Kaufman, is also the chief executive officer and president of our manager, and,
our chief financial officer, Mr. Paul Elenio, is the chief financial officer of our manager. In
addition, Mr. Kaufman and the Kaufman entities together beneficially own approximately 91% of the
outstanding membership interests of ACM and certain of our employees and directors, also hold an
ownership interest in ACM. Furthermore, one of our directors also serves as the trustee of one of
the Kaufman entities that holds a majority of the outstanding membership interests in ACM and
co-trustee of another Kaufman entity that owns an equity interest in our manager. ACM currently
holds a 15.5% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership and 20.1% of the voting
power of our outstanding stock.
40
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency
exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and real estate values. The primary market risks
that we are exposed to are real estate risk and interest rate risk.
Market Conditions
We are subject to market changes in the debt and secondary mortgage markets. These markets
are currently experiencing disruptions, which could have a short term adverse impact on our
earnings and financial condition.
Current conditions in the debt markets include reduced liquidity and increased risk adjusted
premiums. These conditions may increase the cost and reduce the availability of debt. We attempt
to mitigate the impact of debt market disruptions by obtaining adequate debt facilities from a
variety of financing sources. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in
these efforts, that such debt facilities will be adequate or that the cost of such debt facilities
will be at similar terms.
The secondary mortgage markets are also currently experiencing disruptions resulting from
reduced investor demand for collateralized debt obligations and increased investor yield
requirements for these obligations. In light of these conditions, we currently expect to finance
our loan and investment portfolio with our current capital and debt facilities.
Real Estate Risk
Commercial mortgage assets may be viewed as exposing an investor to greater risk of loss than
residential mortgage assets since such assets are typically secured by larger loans to fewer
obligors than residential mortgage assets. Multi-family and commercial property values and net
operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected
adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, events such as natural disasters
including hurricanes and earthquakes, acts of war and/or terrorism (such as the events of September
11, 2001) and others that may cause unanticipated and uninsured performance declines and/or losses
to us or the owners and operators of the real estate securing our investment; national, regional
and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other
factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing, retail, industrial,
office or other commercial space); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments;
construction quality, construction delays, construction cost, age and design; demographic factors;
retroactive changes to building or similar codes; and increases in operating expenses (such as
energy costs). In the event net operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty
repaying our loans, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values
reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our
loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses. Even when the net operating income is
sufficient to cover the related propertys debt service, there can be no assurance that this will
continue to be the case in the future.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and
tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors
beyond our control.
Our operating results will depend in large part on differences between the income from our
loans and our borrowing costs. Most of our loans and borrowings are variable-rate instruments,
based on LIBOR. The objective of this strategy is to minimize the impact of interest rate changes
on our net interest income. In addition, we have various fixed rate loans in our portfolio, which
are financed with variable rate LIBOR borrowings. We have entered into various interest swaps (as
discussed below) to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk on our variable rate LIBOR borrowings
as it relates to our fixed rate loans. Many of our loans and borrowings are subject to various
interest rate floors. As a result, the impact of a change in interest rates may be different on
our interest income than it is on our interest expense.
Based on the loans and liabilities as of March 31, 2008, and assuming the balances of these
loans and liabilities remain unchanged for the subsequent twelve months, a 1.0% increase in LIBOR
would decrease our
41
annual net income and cash flows by approximately $6.0 million. This is primarily due to various interest rate floors that are in effect at a rate that is above a 1.0%
increase in LIBOR which would limit the effect of a 1.0% increase, and increased expense on
variable rate debt, partially offset by our interest rate swaps that effectively convert a portion
of the variable rate LIBOR based debt, as it relates to certain fixed rate assets, to a fixed basis
that is not subject to a 1.0% increase. Based on the loans and liabilities as of March 31, 2008,
and assuming the balances of these loans and liabilities remain unchanged for the subsequent twelve
months, a 1.0% decrease in LIBOR would increase our annual net income and cash flows by
approximately $6.1 million. This is primarily due to various interest rate floors which limit the
effect of a 1.0% decrease on interest income and decreased expense on variable rate debt, partially
offset by our interest rate swaps that effectively converted a portion of the variable rate LIBOR
based debt, as it relates to certain fixed rate assets, to a fixed basis that is not subject to a
1.0% decrease.
Based on the loans and liabilities as of December 31, 2007, and assuming the balances of these
loans and liabilities remain unchanged for the subsequent twelve months, a 1.5% increase in LIBOR
would decrease our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $1.3 million. This is
primarily due to various interest rate floors that are in effect at a rate that is above a 1.5%
increase in LIBOR which would limit the effect of a 1.5% increase, and increased expense on
variable rate debt, partially offset by our interest rate swaps that effectively convert a portion
of the variable rate LIBOR based debt, as it relates to certain fixed rate assets, to a fixed basis
that is not subject to a 1.5% increase. Based on the loans and liabilities as of December 31,
2007, and assuming the balances of these loans and liabilities remain unchanged for the subsequent
twelve months, a 1.5% decrease in LIBOR would increase our annual net income and cash flows by
approximately $12.5 million. This is primarily due to various interest rate floors which limit the
effect of a 1.5% decrease on interest income and decreased expense on variable rate debt, partially
offset by our interest rate swaps that effectively converted a portion of the variable rate LIBOR
based debt, as it relates to certain fixed rate assets, to a fixed basis that is not subject to a
1.5% decrease.
In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn,
defaults could increase and result in credit losses to us, which could adversely affect our
liquidity and operating results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse
effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
In connection with our CDOs described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the
exposure to the risk of changes in the difference between three-month LIBOR and one-month LIBOR
interest rates. These interest rate swaps became necessary due to the investors return being paid
based on a three-month LIBOR index while the assets contributed to the CDOs are yielding interest
based on a one-month LIBOR index.
We had ten of these interest rate swap agreements outstanding that have combined notional
values of $1.3 billion at both March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The market value of these
interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change
over time. If there were a 50 basis point increase in forward interest rates as of March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, the value of these interest rate swaps would have decreased by approximately
$0.1 million for both periods. If there were a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates
as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 the value of these interest rate swaps would have
increased by approximately $0.1 million for both periods.
We have also entered into various interest rate swap agreements in connection with the
issuance of variable rate junior subordinate notes. These swaps have total notional values of
$236.5 million and $191.5 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The
market value of these interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap
spreads, which change over time. If there had been a 50 basis point increase in forward interest
rates as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair market value of these interest rate
swaps would have increased by approximately $4.0 million and $2.9 million, respectively. If there
were a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates as of March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, the fair market value of these interest rate swaps would have decreased by approximately $4.1
million and $3.0 million, respectively.
We also have interest rate swap agreements outstanding to hedge current and outstanding LIBOR
based debt relating to certain fixed rate loans within our portfolio. We had thirty two of these
interest rate swap agreements outstanding that have a combined notional value of $662.0 million as
of March 31, 2008 compared to
twenty seven interest rate swap agreements outstanding with combined notional values of $584.7
million as of December 31, 2007. The fair market value of these interest rate swaps is dependent
upon existing market interest
42
rates and swap spreads, which change over time. If there had been a 50 basis point increase in forward interest rates as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
fair market value of these interest rate swaps would have increased by approximately $15.8 million
and $14.9 million, respectively. If there were a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates
as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair market value of these interest rate swaps
would have decreased by approximately $16.4 million and $15.4 million, respectively.
Our hedging transactions using derivative instruments also involve certain additional risks
such as counterparty credit risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that
unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will cause a significant loss of basis in
the contract. The counterparties to our derivative arrangements are major financial institutions
with high credit ratings with which we and our affiliates may also have other financial
relationships. As a result, we do not anticipate that any of these counterparties will fail to
meet their obligations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect
against the foregoing risks and will ultimately realize an economic benefit that exceeds the
related amounts incurred in connection with engaging in such hedging strategies.
We utilize interest rate swaps to limit interest rate risk. Derivatives are used for hedging
purposes rather than speculation. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.
43
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term
is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon such
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the
end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing,
summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act of 1934
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have not been any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recent
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
44
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Not applicable.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Not applicable.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued a total of 86,772
shares of its common stock to Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC (the Manager) pursuant to the
Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated January 19, 2005 (the Management Agreement), by
and among the Company, the Manager, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and Arbor Realty SR, Inc.
Pursuant to the Management Agreement, in return for the services that ACM provides to the Company,
the Manager is entitled to an incentive fee in certain circumstances and can elect to receive the
incentive fee in shares of common stock of the Company.
The issuance and sale of the shares of common stock pursuant to the Management Agreement was
not registered under the Securities Act in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by
Section 4(2) thereof. These transactions did not involve any public offering of common stock, the
Manager had adequate access to information about the Company, and an appropriate legend was placed
on the certificates evidencing the shares of common stock issued.
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
45
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. * |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Articles
of Incorporation of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
p |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Articles Supplementary of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. * |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. pp |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock. * |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 1, 2003 between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and JMP
Securities, LLC * |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated January 19, 2005, by and among Arbor
Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and
Arbor Realty SR, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, by and among Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor
Commercial Mortgage, LLC and Arbor Realty Limited Partnership. * |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Non-Competition Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, by and among Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor
Realty Limited Partnership and Ivan Kaufman. * |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Arbor Realty Limited
Partnership, dated January 19, 2005, by and among Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC, Arbor
Realty Limited Partnership, Arbor Realty LPOP, Inc. and Arbor Realty GPOP, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and
Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC. * |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Pairing Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, by and among Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor
Commercial Mortgage, LLC, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership, Arbor Realty LPOP, Inc. and
Arbor Realty GPOP, Inc. * |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
2003 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, (as amended and restated on July 29, 2004). ** |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 2003 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement. * |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Benefits Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and
Arbor Management, LLC. * |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement. * |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Structured Facility Warehousing Credit and Security Agreement, dated July 1, 2003, between
Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and Residential Funding Corporation. * |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan Purchase and Repurchase Agreement, dated July 12, 2004, by and
among Arbor Realty Funding LLC, as seller, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
purchaser, and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., as guarantor. *** |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2002, by and between Nomura Credit
and Capital, Inc. and Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC. * |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2004, by and between Arbor
Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and Watershed Administrative LLC and
the lenders named therein. |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Indenture, dated January 19, 2005, by and between Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities Series
2004-1, Ltd., Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities Series 2004-1 LLC, Arbor Realty SR, Inc. and
LaSalle Bank National Association. |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Indenture, dated January 11, 2006, by and between Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities Series
2005-1, Ltd., Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities Series 2005-1 LLC, Arbor Realty SR, Inc. and
LaSalle Bank National Association. |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2006, by and between Column Financial,
Inc. and Arbor Realty SR, Inc. and Arbor TRS Holding Company Inc., as sellers, Arbor Realty
Trust, Inc., Arbor Realty Limited Partnership, as guarantors, and Arbor Realty Mezzanine
LLC. |
46
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Indenture, dated December 14, 2006, by and between Arbor Realty Mortgage
Securities Series 2006-1, Ltd., Arbor Realty Mortgage Securities Series
2006-1 LLC, Arbor Realty SR, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
w |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2007, by and between
Variable Funding Capital Company LLC, as purchaser, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as swingline purchaser, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as deal
agent, Arbor Realty Funding LLC, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership and ARSR
Tahoe, LLC, as sellers, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor Realty Limited
Partnership and Arbor Realty SR, Inc., as guarantors. ww |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated November 6, 2007, by and between Arbor Realty
Funding, LLC, ARSR Tahoe, LLC, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership, and ART 450
LLC, as Borrowers, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc., Arbor Realty Limited
Partnership, and Arbor Realty SR, Inc., as Guarantors, and Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Administrative Agent. www |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the 2003
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan. § |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
p |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007. |
|
pp |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (No.
001-32136) which was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 11, 2007. |
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration
No. 333-110472), as amended. Such registration
statement was originally filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2003. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004. |
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual
Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004. |
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual
Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005. |
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. |
|
w |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual
Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006. |
|
ww |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007. |
|
www |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007. |
|
§ |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-150052) which was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 2, 2008. |
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ivan Kaufman
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Ivan Kaufman |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Paul Elenio
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Paul Elenio |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: May 8, 2008
48