Putnam
New York
Investment Grade
Municipal Trust
Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
-------------------------------
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant
to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:
ANNUAL REPORT ON PERFORMANCE AND OUTLOOK
4-30-05
[GRAPHIC OMITTED: WATCH]
[SCALE LOGO OMITTED]
From the Trustees
[GRAPHIC OMITTED: PHOTO OF JOHN A. HILL AND GEORGE PUTNAM, III]
John A. Hill and
George Putnam, III
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
Throughout the period ended April 30, 2005, the Federal Reserve Board's
series of gradual increases in the federal funds rate occupied much of
investors' attention. However, these increases did not begin to have a
significant impact on stock and bond prices until the early months of
the 2005 calendar year. The Fed's more restrictive monetary policy,
along with stubbornly high energy prices, has caused concern about the
sustainability of corporate profits and slowed the stock market's
momentum. Shorter-term bond prices have also been under pressure due to
worries regarding inflation. In addition, credit quality issues have
become a greater concern, particularly in early May, after the end of
the reporting period, when rating agencies downgraded bonds issued by
Ford and General Motors. Given the uncertainties of this environment,
security selection takes on even greater importance and the in-depth,
professional research and active management that mutual funds can
provide makes them an even more intelligent choice for today's
investors.
We want you to know that Putnam Investments' management team, under the
leadership of Chief Executive Officer Ed Haldeman, continues to focus on
investment performance and remains committed to putting the interests of
shareholders first. In keeping with these goals, we are including
additional disclosure about your fund's management team in this report.
Following the Outlook for Your Fund, we provide manager compensation
information that pertains to your fund. Furthermore, in this report we
provide information about the 2004 approval by the Trustees of your
fund's management contract with Putnam. See page 13 for details.
In the following pages, members of your fund's management team discuss
the fund's performance, the strategies used to pursue the fund's
investment objectives during the reporting period, and the team's plan
for responding to recent changes in the market climate.
As always, we thank you for your continuing confidence in Putnam.
Respectfully yours,
/S/ JOHN A. HILL /S/ GEORGE PUTNAM, III
John A. Hill George Putnam, III
Chairman of the Trustees President of the Funds
June 15, 2005
Report from Fund Management
Fund highlights
* Putnam New York Investment Grade Municipal Trust's total return for
the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, was 10.18% at net asset value
(NAV) and 9.90% at market price.
* The fund's benchmark, the Lehman Municipal Bond Index, returned 6.82%.
* The average return for the fund's Lipper category, New York Municipal
Debt Funds (closed-end), was 10.40%.
* The fund's dividend was reduced to $0.0493 per share, effective in
January. See page 5 for details.
* See the Performance Summary beginning on page 10 for additional fund
performance, comparative performance, and Lipper data.
Performance commentary
Your fund's positive results for the fiscal year reflect the favorable
environment for longer-term, higher-yielding bonds during most of the
period. Our emphasis on uninsured bonds with higher yields helped the
fund outperform its benchmark, the Lehman Municipal Bond Index, which
has a higher overall quality than the fund. However, the fund performed
in line with its Lipper peer group. Your fund's conservative use of
leverage proved advantageous in this year's market environment but did
not help performance relative to the Lipper average. The portfolio's
very limited exposure to airline-related industrial development bonds
(IDBs), reduced the fund's participation in the price rally that
occurred late in the year, which also dampened relative performance.
It is important to note that the fund's performance at market price may
differ from its results at NAV. Although market price performance
generally reflects a fund's investment results, it may also be
influenced by other factors, including changes in investor perceptions
of the fund or its investment advisor, market conditions, fluctuations
in supply and demand for the fund's shares, and changes in fund
distributions.
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RETURN FOR
PERIODS ENDED 4/30/05
--------------------------------------------------
Market
(inception 11/27/92) NAV price
--------------------------------------------------
1 year 10.18% 9.90%
--------------------------------------------------
5 years 43.10 31.20
Annual average 7.43 5.58
--------------------------------------------------
10 years 84.25 56.81
Annual average 6.30 4.60
--------------------------------------------------
Annual average
(life of fund) 6.19 4.31
--------------------------------------------------
Data is historical. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment
return, net asset value, and market price will fluctuate and you may
have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance assumes
reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.
FUND PROFILE
Putnam New York Investment Grade Municipal Trust is a leveraged fund
that seeks to provide as high a level of current income free from
federal income tax and New York state and city personal income taxes as
Putnam management believes is consistent with the preservation of
capital. It may be suitable for investors seeking tax-free income of
high-quality investments primarily issued in New York and who are
willing to accept the risks associated with leverage.
Market overview
Early in the fiscal year, signs of solid economic growth and rising
corporate profits heightened investor concerns about potential
interest-rate increases by the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed). This
concern helped drive bond yields sharply higher and bond prices, which
move in the opposite direction of yields, lower. After the Fed announced
the first of what would be seven 0.25% increases in the federal funds
rate during the fiscal year, bond market investors seemed encouraged
and, initially, rates trended downward modestly. This gradual approach
to reining in economic growth may have helped allay investor fears of
higher longer-term rates, as long-term bond yields ended the year lower
despite rising short-term rates. As shorter- and longer-term interest
rates began to converge, the yield curve flattened. The Fed continued
its tightening policy with another 0.25% increase following period-end.
The same conditions that led to rising interest rates -- an improving
economy and rising corporate earnings -- were particularly favorable for
lower-rated bonds. Among uninsured bonds and especially bonds rated BBB
and below, yield spreads tightened, and bond prices rose. Bonds at the
lower end of the credit spectrum, including BB- and B-rated bonds,
turned in the strongest performance. The improving economy also led
rating agencies to upgrade the State of California's credit rating from
BBB to A. This contributed to higher prices for California bonds and
improved investor perceptions of municipal bonds in general. Puerto Rico
municipal bonds, which are tax-exempt in all states and often trade in
line with bonds issued by the highest-rated and top-performing state,
were also standout performers. Based on continued favorable legal
rulings, yields on tobacco settlement bonds declined overall for the
year, and their prices rose accordingly. Airline-related IDBs staged a
comeback from distressed levels and outperformed over the trailing
one-year period. Callable bonds (which can be redeemed by their issuers
before maturity) outperformed non-callable bonds.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKET SECTOR PERFORMANCE FOR 12 MONTHS ENDED 4/30/05
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bonds
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehman Municipal Bond Index (tax-exempt bonds) 6.82%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index (broad bond market) 5.26%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lehman Government Bond Index (U.S. Treasury and agency
securities) 4.87%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JP Morgan Global High Yield Index (global high-yield
corporate bonds) 6.83%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equities
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P 500 Index (broad stock market) 6.34%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell 1000 Index (large-company stocks) 7.20%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell 2000 Index (small-company stocks) 4.71%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These indexes provide an overview of performance in different market
sectors for the 12 months ended 4/30/05.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Strategy overview
Given our expectation for rising interest rates, your portfolio's
duration was relatively short (or defensive) at the beginning of the
fund's fiscal year and we continued to shorten it as the year
progressed. Duration is a measure of a fund's sensitivity to changes in
interest rates. Investing in bonds with short duration may help protect
principal when interest rates are rising, but it can reduce the fund's
potential for appreciation when rates fall. Although the Fed adjusted
interest rates upward during the period, as we had expected, rates on
long-term bonds trended downward for much of the period, limiting the
fund's participation in the price rally.
Given our expectation that short-term rates would continue to rise, we
reduced the fund's positions in inverse floating-rate securities during
the period. These securities pay additional interest income as short
rates fall and less interest income when short rates rise. Another
technique we used to position the fund to benefit from yield curve
flattening was to buy callable bonds with longer maturities and to sell
non-callable bonds with shorter (generally 10 years or less) maturities.
This strategy was also in line with our expectation that callable bonds
will outperform in a rising interest-rate environment.
The fund's underweight to bonds rated BBB and below detracted from
relative performance versus its peer group during the period, as
securities with lower ratings and higher yields generally outperformed
and many of the fund's peers had a larger exposure to this
strong-performing market segment. The fund's underweight to lower-rated
bonds was primarily due to its investment-grade focus; the fund's
investment policies do not permit it to purchase securities that are
below BBB in quality. We believe that the rally among higher-yielding
bonds has nearly run its course and therefore we expect the fund's
higher quality bias to serve it well going forward.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED: horizontal bar chart THE FUND'S MATURITY AND DURATION
COMPARED]
THE FUND'S MATURITY AND DURATION COMPARED
4/30/04 10/31/04 4/30/05
Average effective
maturity in years 11.0 8.7 7.4
Duration in years 8.9 7.7 7.0
Footnotes read:
This chart compares changes in the fund's duration (a measure of its
sensitivity to interest-rate changes) and its average effective maturity
(a weighted average of the holdings' maturities).
Average effective maturity also takes into account put and call
features, where applicable, and reflects prepayments for mortgage-backed
securities.
How fund holdings affected performance
Tobacco settlement bonds were the fund's top performers for the fiscal
year, although it was a volatile period for this sector. Our decision to
overweight these bonds, relative to the benchmark, enhanced their
contribution to results. Payments from these high-yielding bonds are
secured by the income stream from tobacco companies' settlement
obligations to the states and generally offer higher yields than bonds
of comparable quality. In what has amounted to an ongoing threat to this
income stream, the Department of Justice (DOJ) initiated a lawsuit in
1999 against the major tobacco companies seeking billions of dollars
that the DOJ claimed had been obtained fraudulently from the sale of
cigarettes. In February 2005, the United States Court of Appeals issued
a ruling that investors believe has significantly mitigated the
potential financial impact of the DOJ's lawsuit on tobacco companies,
and the price of tobacco settlement bonds rebounded. The fund owns two
tobacco settlement bonds issued in New York, which rose in price with
the sector as a whole. It also holds tobacco settlement bonds issued by
Puerto Rico Children's Trust Fund, a holding that performed very well
for the full year although it underperformed for the first six months.
In general, economic and market conditions have favored higher-yielding
bonds for much of the past two years. While the fund must restrict its
purchases to bonds rated no lower than BBB -- which confines it to a
higher-grade universe than other, comparable funds -- we looked for as
much yield as possible within that quality range. We found attractive
returns from revenue bonds issued for educational institutions and
utilities. Strong contributors to the fund's results include some BB-rated
bonds issued for Polytechnic University, some A-rated bonds for Hobart &
William Smith Colleges, and some Aa3 bonds issued for Colgate University.
Examples of utility revenue bonds in the portfolio include Brooklyn Navy
Yard Cogen Partners, a co-generation plant in New York state, and Puerto
Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control
Facilities revenue bonds issued for an electric plant built by AES Puerto
Rico.
[GRAPHIC OMITTED: pie chart CREDIT QUALITY OVERVIEW]
CREDIT QUALITY OVERVIEW
Aaa (43.2%)
Aa (8.4%)
A (29.7%)
Baa (12.3%)
Ba (6.4%)
Footnote reads:
As a percentage of market value as of 4/30/05. A bond rated Baa or
higher is considered investment grade. The chart reflects Moody's
ratings; percentages may include unrated bonds considered by Putnam
Management to be of comparable quality. Ratings will vary over time.
The airline-related municipal bond sector has been among the most
troubled sectors of the market since the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001. Although the high yields on these bonds attracted investors,
and their prices began to recover about 18 months ago, we do not believe
the sector's return potential justifies its risk. The fund currently
owns only one such issue, a relatively small position in British Airways
revenue bonds, which has been in the portfolio for some time. Our
analyst currently regards this carrier as stable.
New York City general obligation bonds (GOs) also contributed to fund
results during the period. GOs are backed by taxpayer receipts and are
generally thought to provide a more stable income stream than a bond
issued for a specific project or facility. These bonds have performed
well due to their low supply amid continued strong demand and improving
investor perceptions of the city's financial health.
As discussed in the Strategy Overview section of this report, we have
been selling shorter, non-callable bonds and buying longer, callable
issues because these tend to perform well as the yield curve flattens.
For example, the fund sold $1.4 million in non-callable bonds issued for
New York State Dormitory Authority, which were due to mature in 2011. We
used the proceeds to purchase $1.4 million in Sales Tax Asset Receivable
Corporate New York revenue bonds, which are due in 2025 and have a call
date of 2014. Both issues were insured, meaning that timely payment of
interest and principal is guaranteed and that the bond is AAA-rated.
In December 2004, the fund also benefited when one of its holdings, New
York State Urban Development Corporation bonds, was pre-refunded,
driving up the price of the bonds. Pre-refunding occurs when an issuer
refinances a bond -- generally an older bond issued when interest rates
were higher -- by issuing new bonds at current, lower interest rates.
The proceeds of the new issue are then invested in a secure investment,
usually U.S. Treasury securities, that will mature at the older bond's
first call date, when it is used to pay off the old bonds. This added
security is often perceived as a credit upgrade by the market, and can
boost the price of the older bonds, as happened in this case. The old
bonds were scheduled to mature in 2033. Their next call date, 2013, is
the new maturity date.
Please note that all holdings discussed in this report are subject to
review in accordance with the fund's investment strategy and may vary in
the future.
OF SPECIAL INTEREST
Several older portfolio holdings matured or were called during the
period, requiring reinvestment of the assets at current lower interest
rates. To reflect this reduction in earnings, the fund's dividend was
reduced from $0.0564 to $0.0493, effective with the January 2005
distribution.
The outlook for your fund
The following commentary reflects anticipated developments that could
affect your fund over the next six months, as well as your management
team's plans for responding to them.
Economic growth has continued to be stronger than expected, despite the
Fed's efforts to slow growth and curb inflation by raising short-term
interest rates seven times in 0.25% increments over the course of the
fiscal year. Long-term rates remain surprisingly low. In fact, after
rising modestly in late March and early April of 2005, long-term rates
fell again in the final weeks of the period. Based on sustained solid
economic growth and continued robust corporate earnings, we expect the
Fed to maintain its policy of increasing rates through 2005. We believe
Fed actions are likely to cause rising yields among bonds with shorter
maturities and further flattening of the yield curve as short-term rates
rise faster than long-term rates. We also expect more Fed tightening
than is currently anticipated by the market, i.e., we believe that bond
yields may begin to rise more quickly as investors come to the same
conclusion. Thus we plan to maintain the fund's defensive duration and
to continue to increase its exposure to callable bonds, which are likely
to outperform in a rising-rate cycle.
Among municipal bond sectors, we have a positive view on the
single-family housing sector. We believe that the market has
over-discounted the impact of mortgage prepayments on this sector,
particularly in light of rising interest rates, which are likely to slow
prepayments. We plan to add selectively to our position in the housing
sector. We believe that the dramatic outperformance of lower-rated,
higher-yielding bonds is now slowing and we plan to reduce exposure in
favor of higher-quality issues. Despite recent outperformance, we remain
bearish on airline-related IDBs in light of continued fundamental
weaknesses in this sector. Our view on tobacco settlement bonds is
positive and we are seeking to increase the fund's exposure as
opportunities arise.
We believe we are headed into a more challenging environment for bond
investing. Our task will be to continue to search for the most
attractive opportunities among tax-exempt securities, and to balance the
pursuit of current income with prudent risk management.
The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam
Management. They are not meant as investment advice. The fund invests in
fewer issuers or concentrates its investments by region or sector, and
involves more risk than a fund that invests more broadly. Capital gains,
if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For
some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal
alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be
subject to state and local taxes. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are
subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and
inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall.
Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term
bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses. The
fund's shares trade on a stock exchange at market prices, which may be
lower than the fund's net asset value. The fund uses leverage, which
involves risk and may increase the volatility of the fund's net asset
value.
Your fund's management
Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt
Fixed-Income Team. David Hamlin is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury,
Susan McCormack, and James St. John are Portfolio Members of your fund.
The Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members coordinate the team's
management of the fund.
For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt
Fixed-Income Team, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or
Portfolio Members of your fund, visit Putnam's Individual Investor Web
site at www.putnaminvestments.com.
Fund ownership
The table below shows how much the fund's current Portfolio Leader and
Portfolio Members have invested in the fund (in dollar ranges).
Information shown is as of April 30, 2005, and April 30, 2004.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND PORTFOLIO LEADER AND PORTFOLIO MEMBERS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1 - $10,001 - $50,001- $100,001 - $500,001 - $1,000,001
Year $0 $10,000 $50,000 $100,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 and over
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Hamlin 2005 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio Leader 2004 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Drury 2005 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio Member 2004 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Susan McCormack 2005 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio Member 2004 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James St. John 2005 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio Member 2004 *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund manager compensation
The total 2004 fund manager compensation that is attributable to your
fund is approximately $10,000. This amount includes a portion of 2004
compensation paid by Putnam Management to the fund managers listed in
this section for their portfolio management responsibilities, calculated
based on the fund assets they manage taken as a percentage of the total
assets they manage. The compensation amount also includes a portion of
the 2004 compensation paid to the Chief Investment Officer of the team
and the Group Chief Investment Officer of the fund's broader investment
category for their oversight responsibilities, calculated based on the
fund assets they oversee taken as a percentage of the total assets they
oversee. This amount does not include compensation of other personnel
involved in research, trading, administration, systems, compliance, or
fund operations. These percentages are determined as of the fund's
fiscal period-end. For personnel who joined Putnam Management during or
after 2004, the calculation reflects annualized 2004 compensation or an
estimate of 2005 compensation, as applicable.
Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
David Hamlin is the Portfolio Leader and Paul Drury, Susan McCormack,
and James St. John are Portfolio Members for Putnam's tax-exempt funds
for the following states: Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The
same group also manages Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund*, Putnam
California Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam High Yield Municipal
Trust, Putnam Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Managed Municipal
Income Trust, Putnam Municipal Bond Fund, Putnam Municipal Opportunities
Trust, Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund, Putnam Tax-Free Health Care Fund,
and Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund.
David Hamlin, Paul Drury, Susan McCormack, and James St. John may also
manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam
Management or an affiliate.
Changes in your fund's Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
During the year ended April 30, 2005, Portfolio Member Richard Wyke left
your fund's management team.
* Formerly Putnam Tax-Free Insured Fund.
Fund ownership
The table below shows how much the members of Putnam's Executive Board
have invested in the fund (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of
April 30, 2005, and April 30, 2004.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUTNAM EXECUTIVE BOARD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1 - $10,001 - $50,001- $100,001
Year $0 $10,000 $50,000 $100,000 and over
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philippe Bibi 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Technology Officer 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Boneparth 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Head of Global Institutional Mgmt 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joshua Brooks 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deputy Head of Investments N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Cronin 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Head of Investments 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Haldeman, Jr. 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President and CEO 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amrit Kanwal 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Krichmar 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chief of Operations 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Francis McNamara, III 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Counsel 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Monaghan 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Head of Retail Management 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Robie, III 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Administrative Officer 2004 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward Shadek 2005 *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deputy Head of Investments N/A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N/A indicates the individual was not a member of Putnam's Executive
Board as of 4/30/04.
Performance summary
This section shows your fund's performance during its fiscal year, which
ended April 30, 2005. In accordance with regulatory requirements, we
also include performance for the most current calendar quarter-end.
Performance should always be considered in light of a fund's investment
strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not
guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than
those shown. Investment return, net asset value, and market price will
fluctuate and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RETURN AND COMPARATIVE INDEX RESULTS FOR PERIODS ENDED 4/30/05
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lipper New
York Municipal
Debt Funds
Lehman (closed-end)
Market Municipal category
NAV price Bond Index average*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 year 10.18% 9.90% 6.82% 10.40%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 years 43.10 31.20 40.53 53.35
Annual average 7.43 5.58 7.04 8.85
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 years 84.25 56.81 87.36 97.81
Annual average 6.30 4.60 6.48 7.02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual average
Life of fund
(since 11/27/92) 6.19 4.31 6.40 6.60
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account
for taxes.
Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net
asset value. Lipper calculations for reinvested dividends may differ
from actual performance.
* Over the 1-, 5-, and 10-year periods ended 4/30/05, there were 22, 11,
and 9 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRICE AND DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION 12 MONTHS ENDED 4/30/05
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions -- common shares
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number 12
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income 1 $0.6484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital gains 1 --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $0.6484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series A
Distributions -- preferred shares (200 shares)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income 1 $788.83
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital gains 1 --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $788.83
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Share value (common shares): NAV Market price
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/30/04 $13.18 $11.35
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/30/05 13.75 11.81
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current return (common shares, end of period)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current dividend rate 2 4.30% 5.01%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taxable equivalent 3 7.53 8.77
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases,
state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to
the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds
may be subject to state and local taxes.
2 Most recent distribution, excluding capital gains, annualized and
divided by NAV or market price at end of period.
3 Assumes maximum 42.9% federal, state, and city tax rate for 2005.
Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as
advantageous.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL RETURN FOR PERIODS ENDED 3/31/05 (MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAV Market price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 year 4.24% -2.14%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 years 38.85 31.22
Annual average 6.78 5.58
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 years 80.92 60.26
Annual average 6.11 4.83
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual average
Life of fund
(since 11/27/92) 6.05 4.16
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms and definitions
Total return shows how the value of the fund's shares changed over time,
assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested
all distributions in the fund.
Net asset value (NAV) is the value of all your fund's assets, minus any
liabilities and the net assets allocated to any outstanding preferred
shares, divided by the number of outstanding common shares.
Market price is the current trading price of one share of the fund.
Market prices are set by transactions between buyers and sellers on
exchanges such as the American Stock Exchange and the New York Stock
Exchange.
Comparative indexes
JP Morgan Global High Yield Index is an unmanaged index of global
high-yield fixed-income securities.
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S.
investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Lehman Government Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. Treasury and
agency securities.
Lehman Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term
fixed-rate investment-grade tax-exempt bonds.
Russell 1000 Index is an unmanaged index of the 1,000 largest companies
in the Russell 3000 Index.
Russell 2000 Index is an unmanaged index of the 2,000 smallest companies
in the Russell 3000 Index.
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for
fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You
cannot invest directly in an index.
Lipper is a third-party industry ranking entity that ranks funds
(without sales charges) with similar current investment styles or
objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper category averages reflect
performance trends for funds within a category and are based on results
at net asset value.
Trustee approval of management contract
General conclusions
The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of
each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to
approve the continuance of each fund's management contract with Putnam
Management. In this regard the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of
its Contract Committee consisting solely of Independent Trustees,
requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary in
the circumstances. Over the course of several months beginning in March
and ending in June of 2004, the Contract Committee reviewed the
information provided by Putnam Management and other information
developed with the assistance of the Board's independent counsel and
independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key
aspects of this information with all of the Independent Trustees. Upon
completion of this review, the Contract Committee recommended and the
Independent Trustees approved the continuance of your fund's contract,
effective July 1, 2004.
This approval was based on the following conclusions:
* That the fee schedule currently in effect for your fund represents
reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the
services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds
and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such service,
and
* That such fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between fund
shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may
exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.
These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all
information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any
single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the
Trustees' deliberations are described below.
Model fee schedules and categories; total expenses
The Trustees, working in cooperation with Putnam Management, have
developed and implemented a series of model fee schedules for the Putnam
funds designed to ensure that each fund's management fee is consistent
with the fees for similar funds in the Putnam complex and compares
favorably with fees paid by competitive funds sponsored by other advisors.
The Trustees reviewed the model fee schedule currently in effect for the
fund, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of the fund
to a particular fee category under this structure. The Trustees also
reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds.
The Trustees concluded that no changes should be made in the fund's
current fee schedule at this time. The Trustees noted that expense ratios
for a number of Putnam funds had been increasing recently as a result of
declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints. They
noted that such expense ratio increases were currently being controlled by
expense limitations implemented in January 2004. They also noted that the
competitive landscape regarding mutual fund fees may be changing as a
result of fee reductions accepted by various other fund groups in
connection with recent regulatory settlements and greater focus on fees
and expenses in the mutual fund industry generally. The Trustees indicated
an intention to monitor these developments closely.
Economies of scale
As noted above, the Trustees concluded that the fee schedule currently
in effect for your fund represents an appropriate sharing of economies
of scale at current asset levels. The Trustees indicated their intention
to continue their ongoing consideration of economies of scale and in
particular to consider further the possible operation of such economies
in the event that a significant recovery in the equity markets or net
fund sales were to raise asset levels substantially above current
levels. In this regard, the Trustees noted that they had reviewed data
relating to the substantial increase in asset levels of the Putnam funds
that occurred during the years leading up to the market peak in 2000,
the subsequent decline in assets and the resulting impact on revenues
and expenses of Putnam Management. The Trustees also noted that recent
declines in net assets in many Putnam funds, together with significant
changes in the cost structure of Putnam Management have altered the
economics of Putnam Management's business in significant ways. The
Trustees concluded that they would monitor these changes carefully and
evaluate the resulting impact on Putnam Management's economics and the
sharing of economies of scale between the parties.
Investment performance
The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management
represented a major factor in the Trustees' evaluation of the quality of
services provided by Putnam Management under the Management Contracts.
The Trustees recognized that a high quality investment process -- as
measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the
management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such
personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract
and retain high-quality personnel -- does not guarantee favorable
investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees
considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time
periods and considered information comparing the fund's performance with
various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds. The
Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of many Putnam
funds.
They also noted the disappointing investment performance of certain
funds in recent years and continued to discuss with senior management of
Putnam Management the factors contributing to such under-performance and
actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized
that, in recent years, Putnam Management has made significant changes in
its investment personnel and processes and in the fund product line in
an effort to address areas of underperformance. The Trustees indicated
their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the
effectiveness of these changes and to evaluate whether additional
remedial changes are warranted. As a general matter, the Trustees
concluded that consultation between the Trustees and Putnam Management
represents the most effective way to address investment performance
problems. The Trustees believe that investors in the Putnam funds and
their financial advisors have, as a general matter, effectively placed
their trust in the Putnam organization, under the supervision of the
funds' Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management
of the funds. The Trustees believe that the termination of the
Management Contract and engagement of a new investment adviser for
under-performing funds, with all the attendant disruptions, would not
serve the interests of fund shareholders at this time and would not
necessarily provide any greater assurance of improved investment
performance.
Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits
The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam
Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under
the Management Contract with your fund. These include principally
benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, which pertain
mainly to funds investing in equity securities. The Trustees believe
that soft-dollar credits and other potential benefits associated with
the allocation of fund brokerage represent assets of the funds that
should be used for the benefit of fund shareholders. The Trustees noted
recent trends in the allocation of fund brokerage, including commission
costs, the allocation of brokerage to firms that provide research
services to Putnam Management, and the sources and application of
available soft-dollar credits. Effective December 31, 2003, reflecting a
decision made by the Trustees earlier that year, Putnam Management
ceased allocating brokerage in connection with the sale of fund shares.
In addition, in preparing its budget for commission allocations in 2004,
Putnam Management voluntarily reduced substantially the allocation of
brokerage commissions to acquire research services from third-party
service providers. In light of evolving best practices in the mutual
fund industry, the Trustees concluded that this practice should be
further curtailed and possibly eliminated in the near future. The
Trustees indicated that they would continue to monitor the allocation of
the funds' brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and
execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules
The information examined by the Trustees as part of the annual contract
reviews included information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management
and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit
pension plans and college endowments. This information included
comparison of such fees with fees charged to the Putnam funds, as well
as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to
these two types of clients. The Trustees devoted special attention to
these issues and reviewed recent articles by critics of mutual fund
fees, articles by the ICI defending such fee differences, and relevant
guidance provided by decisions of the courts. The Trustees observed, in
this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional
clients and mutual funds are by no means uniform when examined by
individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of
investment management services to these types of clients reflects to a
substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate
market places. In reaching their conclusions, the Trustees considered
the fact that fee rates across all asset sectors are higher on average
for mutual funds than for institutional clients, and also considered the
differences between the services that Putnam provides to the Putnam
funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm.
Settlement of regulatory charges related to market timing
Finally, in reaching their conclusions, the Trustees considered all
matters pertinent to the administrative charges filed against Putnam
Management by the SEC and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in October
2003 relating to market timing, the firm's settlement of those charges,
and the conclusions and recommendations of the Trustees' Audit and
Pricing Committee based on its review of these matters. The Trustees
considered the actions taken by the owner of Putnam Management and its
new senior management to terminate or discipline the individuals
involved, to implement new compliance systems, to indemnify the funds
against all costs and liabilities related to these matters, and
otherwise to ensure that the interests of the funds and their
shareholders are fully protected. The Trustees noted that, in addition
to the settlements of the regulatory charges which will provide
comprehensive restitution for any losses suffered by shareholders, the
new senior management of Putnam Management has moved aggressively to
control expense ratios of funds affected by market timing, to reduce
charges to new investors, to improve disclosure of fees and expenses,
and to emphasize the paramount role of investment performance in
achieving shareholders' investment goals.
Other information for shareholders
Putnam's policy on confidentiality
In order to conduct business with our shareholders, we must obtain
certain personal information such as account holders' addresses,
telephone numbers, Social Security numbers, and the names of their
financial advisors. We use this information to assign an account number
and to help us maintain accurate records of transactions and account
balances. It is our policy to protect the confidentiality of your
information, whether or not you currently own shares of our funds, and
in particular, not to sell information about you or your accounts to
outside marketing firms. We have safeguards in place designed to prevent
unauthorized access to our computer systems and procedures to protect
personal information from unauthorized use. Under certain circumstances,
we share this information with outside vendors who provide services to
us, such as mailing and proxy solicitation. In those cases, the service
providers enter into confidentiality agreements with us, and we provide
only the information necessary to process transactions and perform other
services related to your account. We may also share this information
with our Putnam affiliates to service your account or provide you with
information about other Putnam products or services. It is also our
policy to share account information with your financial advisor, if
you've listed one on your Putnam account. If you would like
clarification about our confidentiality policies or have any questions
or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact us at 1-800-225-1581,
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., or Saturdays from 9:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Proxy voting
Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests
of our shareholders. The Putnam funds' proxy voting guidelines and
procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June
30, 2004, are available on the Putnam Individual Investor Web site,
www.putnaminvestments.com/individual, and on the SEC's Web site,
www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC's Web
site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the
Putnam funds' proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by
calling Putnam's Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund portfolio holdings
For periods ending on or after July 9, 2004, the fund will file a
complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first
and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may
obtain the fund's Forms N-Q on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov. In
addition, the fund's Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's
public reference room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC's Web site or the operation
of the public reference room.
A guide to the financial statements
These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes,
preceded by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,
constitute the fund's financial statements.
The fund's portfolio lists all the fund's investments and their values
as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by
asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of
concentration and diversification.
Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund's net assets and
share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are
added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are
subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of
shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated
separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares,
the amount subtracted from total assets includes the net assets
allocated to remarketed preferred shares.)
Statement of operations shows the fund's net investment gain or loss.
This is done by first adding up all the fund's earnings -- from
dividends and interest income -- and subtracting its operating expenses
to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or
loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings -- as well as any
unrealized gains or losses over the period -- is added to or subtracted
from the net investment result to determine the fund's net gain or loss
for the fiscal year.
Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund's net assets were
affected by the fund's net investment gain or loss, by distributions to
shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund's shares. It
lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized
capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent
fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources
listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are
determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the
one in which they were earned.
Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund's investment
results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment
income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting
the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the
highlight table also includes the current reporting period. For open-end
funds, a separate table is provided for each share class.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Trustees and Shareholders of
Putnam New York Investment Grade Municipal Trust
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities,
including the fund's portfolio, and the related statements of operations
and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Putnam New
York Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the "fund") at April 30, 2005,
and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the
financial highlights for each of the periods indicated, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter
referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the
fund's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of
these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included
confirmation of investments owned at April 30, 2005, by correspondence
with the custodian, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 9, 2005
The fund's portfolio
April 30, 2005
Key to Abbreviations
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMBAC AMBAC Indemnity Corporation
FGIC Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FRB Floating Rate Bonds
FSA Financial Security Assurance
G.O. Bonds General Obligation Bonds
IFB Inverse Floating Rate Bonds
MBIA MBIA Insurance Company
U.S. Govt. Coll. U.S. Government Collateralized
Municipal bonds and notes (122.4%) (a)
Principal amount Rating (RAT) Value
New York (119.8%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$300,000 Albany Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Rev. Bonds (Albany College of
Pharmacy), Ser. A, 5 3/8s, 12/1/24 BBB- $314,514
250,000 Albany, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac.
Rev. Bonds (Charitable Leadership),
Ser. A , 6s, 7/1/19 Baa3 271,178
500,000 Chemung Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Civic Fac. Rev. Bonds (Arnot Ogden
Med. Ctr.), 5s, 11/1/34 A3 506,210
700,000 Dutchess Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Civic Fac. Rev. Bonds (Bard
College), 5 3/4s, 8/1/30 A3 759,591
250,000 Essex Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Rev. Bonds (Intl. Paper Co.),
Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 10/1/26 Baa2 255,475
500,000 Geneva, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds
(Hobart & William Smith), Ser. A,
5 3/8s, 2/1/33 A 531,995
395,000 Hempstead, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Hofstra U.),
5 1/4s, 7/1/16 A 423,657
Long Island, Pwr. Auth. NY Elec.
Syst. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A
750,000 5 1/4s, 12/1/26 A- 790,395
2,000,000 AMBAC, 5s, 9/1/29 Aaa 2,101,800
1,000,000 Madison Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Rev. Bonds (Colgate U.), Ser. A, 5s,
7/1/23 Aa3 1,058,970
1,000,000 Metro. Trans. Auth. Rev. Bonds,
Ser. A, FSA, 5s, 11/15/30 Aaa 1,043,960
Metro. Trans. Auth. Svc. Contract
Rev. Bonds
500,000 (Trans. Fac.), Ser. O, U.S. Govt.
Coll., 5 3/4s, 7/1/13 AAA 565,200
1,000,000 Ser. A , MBIA, 5 1/2s, 1/1/20 Aaa 1,115,570
450,000 Niagara Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Rev. Bonds, Ser. C, 5 5/8s, 11/15/24 BBB 483,579
200,000 NY City, FRB, AMBAC, 2.3s, 9/1/11 Aaa 200,000
NY City, G.O. Bonds
185,000 Ser. I, U.S. Govt. Coll., 6 1/4s,
4/15/17 Aaa 199,165
1,000,000 Ser. B, 5 3/4s, 8/1/16 A1 1,120,360
700,000 Ser. B, U.S. Govt. Coll., 5 1/2s,
12/1/31 (Prerefunded) AAA 793,877
300,000 Ser. B, 5 1/2s, 12/1/31 A1 321,837
500,000 Ser. M, 5s, 4/1/24 A1 523,865
200,000 NY City, IFB, AMBAC, 9.52s, 9/1/11 Aaa 203,384
300,000 NY City, Hlth. & Hosp. Corp.
Rev. Bonds (Hlth. Syst.), Ser. A ,
5 3/8s, 2/15/26 A3 313,212
750,000 NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds
(Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogen.
Partners), 5.65s, 10/1/28 BBB- 740,370
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac.
Rev. Bonds
450,000 (Staten Island U. Hosp.), Ser. A,
6 3/8s, 7/1/31 Ba3 451,616
250,000 (Brooklyn Polytech. U. Project J),
6 1/8s, 11/1/30 BB+ 252,463
250,000 (St. Francis College), 5s, 10/1/34 A- 257,750
700,000 NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Special
Arpt. Fac. Rev. Bonds (Airis JFK I
LLC), Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 7/1/28 Baa3 702,842
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Special
Fac. Rev. Bonds
1,000,000 (Terminal One Group Assn.), 6s,
1/1/15 A3 1,016,360
100,000 (British Airways), 5 1/4s, 12/1/32 Ba2 85,544
500,000 NY City, Muni. Wtr. & Swr. Fin.
Auth. Rev. Bonds, Ser. G, FSA, 5s,
6/15/34 Aaa 516,990
1,000,000 NY Cntys., Tobacco Trust II
Rev. Bonds (Tobacco Settlement),
5 3/4s, 6/1/43 BBB 996,880
300,000 NY Cntys., Tobacco Trust III
Rev. Bonds, 6s, 6/1/43 Baa2 305,163
NY State Dorm. Auth. Rev. Bonds
875,000 (State U. Edl. Fac.), Ser. A,
7 1/2s, 5/15/13 AA- 1,104,171
250,000 (Mount Sinai Hlth.), Ser. A, 6 1/2s,
7/1/25 Ba1 263,965
45,000 (Mental Hlth.), Ser. A, 5 3/4s,
2/15/27 (Prerefunded) AA- 48,235
25,000 (Mental Hlth.), Ser. A, 5 3/4s,
2/15/27 AA- 26,575
450,000 (Winthrop-U. Hosp. Assn.), Ser. A,
5 1/2s, 7/1/32 Baa1 472,266
870,000 (Dept. of Hlth.), 5 1/2s, 7/1/25
(Prerefunded) AA- 915,153
630,000 (Dept. of Hlth.), 5 1/2s, 7/1/25 AA- 662,697
600,000 (North Shore Long Island Jewish
Group), 5 3/8s, 5/1/23 A3 637,812
300,000 (NY Methodist Hosp.), 5 1/4s, 7/1/17 A3 326,823
1,000,000 (School Dist. Fin.), Ser. A, MBIA,
5 1/4s, 4/1/11 Aaa 1,108,400
250,000 (Lenox Hill Hosp. Oblig. Group),
5 1/4s, 7/1/08 A3 262,123
1,500,000 (NY U.), Ser. 2, AMBAC, 5s, 7/1/41 Aaa 1,547,190
500,000 (Rochester U.), Ser. A, 5s, 7/1/34 A1 518,565
1,000,000 (NY U.), Ser. A, FGIC, 5s, 7/1/29 Aaa 1,051,700
1,000,000 Ser. A, FGIC, 5s, 3/15/27 Aaa 1,113,200
1,000,000 (Dept. of Hlth.), Ser. 2, FGIC, 5s,
7/1/22 Aaa 1,067,300
1,875,000 NY State Dorm. Auth. Lease
Rev. Bonds (State U. Dorm. Facs.),
Ser. A, MBIA, 5s, 7/1/24 Aaa 2,005,913
500,000 NY State Energy Research & Dev.
Auth. Fac. Mandatory Put Bonds,
4.7s, 10/1/12 A1 501,310
400,000 NY State Energy Research & Dev.
Auth. Gas Fac. Rev. Bonds (Brooklyn
Union Gas), 6.952s, 7/1/26 A+ 424,332
250,000 NY State Env. Fac. Corp. Rev. Bonds,
5s, 6/15/32 Aaa 262,043
155,000 NY State Env. Fac. Corp. Poll.
Control Rev. Bonds (State Wtr.
Revolving Fund), Ser. A, 7 1/2s,
6/15/12 Aaa 171,275
750,000 NY State Pwr. Auth. Rev. Bonds, 5s,
11/15/20 Aa2 801,360
NY State Thruway Auth. Rev. Bonds,
Ser. A, MBIA
1,000,000 5 1/4s, 4/1/13 Aaa 1,123,620
1,000,000 5 1/4s, 4/1/12 Aaa 1,116,930
1,000,000 NY State Urban Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds
(Personal Income Tax), Ser. C-1, 5s,
3/15/33 AA 1,113,200
1,000,000 Port Auth. NY & NJ Cons. Rev. Bonds,
Ser. 124, 5s, 8/1/31 AA- 1,022,110
3,000,000 Port. Auth. NY & NJ Special
Obligation Rev. Bonds (JFK Intl. Air
Term. - 6), MBIA, 5.9s, 12/1/17 Aaa 3,243,000
1,425,000 Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp.
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, MBIA, 5s,
10/15/25 Aaa 1,526,888
100,000 Saratoga Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Civic Fac. Rev. Bonds (Saratoga
Hosp.), Ser. A, 5s, 12/1/13 BBB+ 106,374
500,000 Suffolk Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy.
Civic Fac. Rev. Bonds (Huntington
Hosp.), Ser. B, 5 7/8s, 11/1/32 Baa1 528,335
1,000,000 Tobacco Settlement Fin. Auth.
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A-1, 5 1/2s, 6/1/18 AA- 1,109,150
1,000,000 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth.
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, 5s, 1/1/32 Aa2 1,035,410
165,000 Westchester Cnty., Indl Dev. Agcy.
Civic Fac. Rev. Bonds (Guiding Eyes
for the Blind), 5 3/8s, 8/1/24 BBB 173,303
250,000 Yonkers, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac.
Rev. Bonds (St. John's Riverside
Hosp.), Ser. A, 7 1/8s, 7/1/31 BB 259,960
--------------
46,874,460
Puerto Rico (2.6%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
750,000 Children's Trust Fund Tobacco
Settlement Rev. Bonds, 5 1/2s,
5/15/39 BBB 750,848
250,000 PR Indl. Tourist Edl. Med. & Env.
Control Fac. Rev. Bonds (Cogen.
Fac.-AES), 6 5/8s, 6/1/26 Baa3 273,466
--------------
1,024,314
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Investments (cost $45,602,424) $47,898,774
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $39,143,726.
(RAT) The Moody's or Standard & Poor's ratings indicated are believed to
be the most recent ratings available at April 30, 2005 for the
securities listed. Ratings are generally ascribed to securities at the
time of issuance. While the agencies may from time to time revise such
ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings do not
necessarily represent what the agencies would ascribe to these
securities at April 30, 2005. Securities rated by Putnam are indicated
by "/P". Ratings are not covered by the Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm. Security ratings are defined in the Statement of
Additional Information.
The rates shown on Mandatory Put Bonds and Floating Rate Bonds (FRB) are
the current interest rates at April 30, 2005.
The dates shown on Mandatory Put Bonds are the next mandatory put dates.
The rates shown on IFB's, which are securities paying interest rates
that vary inversely to changes in the market interest rates, are the
current interest rates at April 30, 2005.
The fund had the following industry group concentrations greater than
10% at April 30, 2005 (as a percentage of net assets):
Transportation 26.5%
Education 22.3
Utilities 14.4
Health care 13.8
The fund had the following insurance concentration greater than 10% at
April 30, 2005 (as a percentage of net assets):
MBIA 28.7%
AMBAC 10.4
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Statement of assets and liabilities
April 30, 2005
Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investments in securities, at value (identified cost
$45,602,424) (Note 1) $47,898,774
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash 768,489
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest and other receivables 739,612
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets 49,406,875
Liabilities
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions payable to common shareholders 140,335
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accrued preferred shares distribution payable (Note 1) 1,562
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2) 78,256
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payable for investor servicing and custodian fees (Note 2) 3,466
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) 26,043
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payable for administrative services (Note 2) 1,012
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other accrued expenses 12,475
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 263,149
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Series A remarketed preferred shares: (200 shares authorized
and outstanding at $50,000 per share (Note 4) 10,000,000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets applicable to common shares outstanding $39,143,726
Represented by
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paid-in capital -- common shares (unlimited shares
authorized) (Note 1) $38,791,055
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Undistributed net investment income (Note 1) 30,727
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated net realized loss on investments (Note 1) (1,974,406)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized appreciation of investments 2,296,350
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total -- Representing net assets applicable to common shares
outstanding $39,143,726
Computation of net asset value
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net asset value per common share ($39,143,726 divided by
2,847,092 shares) $13.75
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Statement of operations
Year ended April 30, 2005
Interest income: $2,332,686
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compensation of Manager (Note 2) 312,389
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investor servicing fees (Note 2) 19,161
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Custodian fees (Note 2) 25,678
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) 12,191
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative services (Note 2) 14,487
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auditing 70,937
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preferred share remarketing agent fees 25,110
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other 50,241
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total expenses 530,194
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expense reduction (Note 2) (19,052)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net expenses 511,142
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment income 1,821,544
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized gain on investments (Notes 1 and 3) 461,922
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized appreciation of investments during the year 1,329,639
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net gain on investments 1,791,561
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations $3,613,105
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions to Series A remarketed preferred shareholders: (Note 1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From tax exempt income (157,765)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
(applicable to common shareholders) $3,455,340
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Statement of changes in net assets
Year ended April 30
Increase (decrease) in net assets 2005 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment income $1,821,544 $2,037,689
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized gain (loss) on investments 461,922 (880,849)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net unrealized appreciation of investments 1,329,639 397,005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in net assets resulting from
operations 3,613,105 1,553,845
Distributions to Series A remarketed
preferred shareholders: (Note 1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From tax exempt income (157,765) (94,473)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in net assets resulting from
operations (applicable to common
shareholders) 3,455,340 1,459,372
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions to common shareholders: (Note 1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From tax exempt income (1,845,720) (1,988,347)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total increase (decrease) in net assets 1,609,620 (528,975)
Net assets
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beginning of year 37,534,106 38,063,081
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of year (including undistributed net
investment income of $30,727 and $224,167,
respectively) $39,143,726 $37,534,106
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of fund shares
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common shares outstanding at beginning and
end of year 2,847,092 2,847,092
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarketed preferred shares outstanding at
beginning and end of year 200 200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Financial highlights
(For a common share outstanding throughout the period)
Per-share Year ended April 30
operating performance 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net asset value,
beginning of period
(common shares) $13.18 $13.37 $13.32 $13.45 $12.81
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment operations:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net investment income (a) .64 .72 .83 .88 .83
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net realized and unrealized
gain (loss) on investments .64 (.18) (.02) (.23) .72
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total from investment operations: 1.28 .54 .81 .65 1.55
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions to preferred shareholders:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From net investment income (.06) (.03) (.04) (.07) (.13)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total from investment
operations: (applicable to
common shareholders) 1.22 .51 .77 .58 1.42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distributions to common shareholders:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From net investment income (.65) (.70) (.72) (.71) (.78)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total distributions (.65) (.70) (.72) (.71) (.78)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net asset value, end of period
(common shares) $13.75 $13.18 $13.37 $13.32 $13.45
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market price, end of period
(common shares) $11.81 $11.35 $11.99 $12.12 $12.46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total return at market price (%)
(common shares) (b) 9.90 0.26 4.88 2.96 10.28
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratios and supplemental data
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets, end of period
(common shares)
(in thousands) $39,144 $37,534 $38,063 $37,917 $38,288
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of expenses to
average net assets (%)(c)(d) 1.39 1.33 1.36 1.35 1.41
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio of net investment income
to average net assets (%)(c) 4.35 5.06 5.84 5.96 5.25
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Portfolio turnover rate (%) 35.82 21.43 35.93 25.16 15.65
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Per share net investment income has been determined on the basis of
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.
(b) Total return assumes dividend reinvestment.
(c) Ratios reflect net assets available to common shares only; net
investment income ratio also reflects reduction for distributions to
preferred shareholders.
(d) Includes amounts paid through expense offset arrangements (Note 2).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
Notes to financial statements
April 30, 2005
Note 1
Significant accounting policies
Putnam New York Investment Grade Municipal Trust (the "fund") is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a
non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The fund's
investment objective is to seek as high a level of current income exempt
from federal income tax and New York State and City personal income tax,
as Putnam Investment Management, LLC, ("Putnam Management"), the fund's
manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC believes to
be consistent with preservation of capital. The fund intends to achieve
its objective by investing in investment grade municipal securities
selected by Putnam Management. The fund may be affected by economic and
political developments in the state of New York.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial
statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial
statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net
assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
A) Security valuation Tax-exempt bonds and notes are valued at fair
value on the basis of valuations provided by an independent pricing
service, approved by the Trustees. Such services use information with
respect to transactions in bonds, quotations from bond dealers, market
transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between
securities in determining value. Other investments are valued at fair
value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and
procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees.
B) Security transactions and related investment income Security
transactions are recorded on the trade date (date the order to buy or
sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on
the identified cost basis.
Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premiums/discounts
are amortized/accreted on a yield-to-maturity basis. The premium in
excess of the call price, if any, is amortized to the call date;
thereafter, any remaining premium is amortized to maturity.
C) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its
income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") applicable
to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund
to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax
under Section 4982 of the Code, as amended. Therefore, no provision has
been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized
appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital
gains.
At April 30, 2005, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $1,960,894
available to the extent allowed by tax law to offset future net capital
gain, if any. The amount of the carryover and the expiration dates are:
Loss Carryover Expiration
--------------------------------
$433,833 April 30, 2008
311,893 April 30, 2011
1,215,168 April 30, 2012
D) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to common and preferred
shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the
ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded
on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. Dividends on
remarketed preferred shares become payable when, as and if declared by
the Trustees. Each dividend period for the remarketed preferred shares
is generally a 28-day period. The applicable dividend rate for the
remarketed preferred shares on April 30, 2005 was 2.85%. The amount and
character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in
accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally
accepted accounting principles. These differences include temporary and
permanent differences of the expiration of a capital loss carryover,
dividends payable and straddle loss deferrals. Reclassifications are
made to the fund's capital accounts to reflect income and gains
available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under
income tax regulations. For the year ended April 30, 2005, the fund
reclassified $11,499 to decrease undistributed net investment income and
$82,184 to decrease paid in capital, with a decrease to accumulated net
realized losses of $93,683.
The tax basis components of distributable earnings and the federal tax
cost as of period end were as follows:
Unrealized appreciation $2,357,567
Unrealized depreciation (61,217)
------------
Net unrealized appreciation 2,296,350
Undistributed tax exempt
income 157,682
Capital loss carryforward (1,960,894)
Cost for federal income
tax purposes $45,602,424
E) Determination of net asset value Net asset value of the common shares
is determined by dividing the value of all assets of the fund, less all
liabilities and the liquidation preference of any outstanding remarketed
preferred shares, by the total number of common shares outstanding as of
period end.
Note 2
Management fee, administrative
services and other transactions
Compensation of Putnam Management, for management and investment advisory
services is paid quarterly based on the average net assets of the fund.
Such fee is based on 0.65% of the fund's weekly average net assets
attributable to common and preferred shares outstanding.
If dividends payable on remarketed preferred shares during any dividend
payment period plus any expenses attributable to remarketed preferred
shares for that period exceed the fund's gross income attributable to the
proceeds of the remarketed preferred shares during that period, then the
fee payable to Putnam Management for that period will be reduced by the
amount of the excess (but not more than 0.65% of the liquidation
preference of the remarketed preferred shares outstanding during the
period).
The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the
compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and
their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate
amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.
Custodial functions for the fund's assets are provided by Putnam Fiduciary
Trust Company (PFTC), a subsidiary of Putnam, LLC. Putnam Investor
Services, a division of PFTC, provides investor servicing agent functions
to the fund. During the year ended April 30, 2005, the fund paid PFTC
$44,839 for these services.
The fund has entered into an arrangement with PFTC whereby credits
realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a
portion of the fund's expenses. For the year ended April 30, 2005, the
fund's expenses were reduced by $19,052 under these arrangements.
Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of
which $473, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and
an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive
additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings.
The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the "Deferral Plan")
which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of
Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain
invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the
Deferral Plan.
The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension
plan (the "Pension Plan") covering all Trustees of the fund who have
served as a Trustee for at least five years. Benefits under the Pension
Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee's average total retainer and meeting
fees for the three years preceding retirement. Pension expense for the
fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the statement of
operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee
compensation and expenses in the statement of assets and liabilities. The
Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee
first elected after 2003.
Note 3
Purchases and sales of securities
During the year ended April 30, 2005, cost of purchases and proceeds
from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments
aggregated $16,728,992 and $17,438,869, respectively. There were no
purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
Note 4
Preferred shares
The Series A shares are redeemable at the option of the fund on any
dividend payment date at a redemption price of $50,000 per share, plus
an amount equal to any dividends accumulated on a daily basis but unpaid
through the redemption date (whether or not such dividends have been
declared) and, in certain circumstances, a call premium.
It is anticipated that dividends paid to holders of remarketed preferred
shares will be considered tax-exempt dividends under the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986. To the extent that the fund earns taxable income
and capital gains by the conclusion of a fiscal year, it may be required
to apportion to the holders of the remarketed preferred shares
throughout that year additional dividends as necessary to result in an
after-tax equivalent to the applicable dividend rate for the period.
Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the fund is required to
maintain asset coverage of at least 200% with respect to the remarketed
preferred shares as of the last business day of each month in which any
such shares are outstanding. Additionally, the fund is required to meet
more stringent asset coverage requirements under terms of the remarketed
preferred shares and the shares' rating agencies. Should these
requirements not be met, or should dividends accrued on the remarketed
preferred shares not be paid, the fund may be restricted in its ability
to declare dividends to common shareholders or may be required to redeem
certain of the remarketed preferred shares. At April 30, 2005, no such
restrictions have been placed on the fund.
Note 5
Regulatory matters and litigation
Putnam Management has entered into agreements with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Securities Division settling
charges connected with excessive short-term trading by Putnam employees
and, in the case of the charges brought by the Massachusetts Securities
Division, by participants in some Putnam-administered 401(k) plans.
Pursuant to these settlement agreements, Putnam Management will pay a
total of $193.5 million in penalties and restitution, with $153.5
million being paid to shareholders and the funds. The restitution amount
will be allocated to shareholders pursuant to a plan developed by an
independent consultant, with payments to shareholders currently expected
by the end of the summer.
The Securities and Exchange Commission's and Massachusetts Securities
Division's allegations and related matters also serve as the general
basis for numerous lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits
filed against Putnam Management and certain related parties, including
certain Putnam funds. Putnam Management will bear any costs incurred by
Putnam funds in connection with these lawsuits. Putnam Management
believes that the likelihood that the pending private lawsuits and
purported class action lawsuits will have a material adverse financial
impact on the fund is remote, and the pending actions are not likely to
materially affect its ability to provide investment management services
to its clients, including the Putnam funds.
Federal tax information
(Unaudited)
The fund has designated 100% of dividends paid from net investment
income during the fiscal year as tax exempt for Federal income tax
purposes.
The Form 1099 you receive in January 2006 will show the tax status of
all distributions paid to your account in calendar 2005.
About the Trustees
Jameson A. Baxter (9/6/43), Trustee since 1994
Ms. Baxter is the President of Baxter Associates, Inc., a private
investment firm that she founded in 1986.
Ms. Baxter serves as a Director of ASHTA Chemicals, Inc., Banta
Corporation (a printing and digital imaging firm), Ryerson Tull, Inc. (a
steel service corporation), the Mutual Fund Directors Forum, Advocate
Health Care and BoardSource, formerly the National Center for Nonprofit
Boards. She is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees, Mount Holyoke
College, having served as Chairman for five years and as a board member
for thirteen years. Until 2002, Ms. Baxter was a Director of Intermatic
Corporation (a manufacturer of energy control products).
Ms. Baxter has held various positions in investment banking and
corporate finance, including Vice President and Principal of the Regency
Group, and Vice President of and Consultant to First Boston Corporation.
She is a graduate of Mount Holyoke College.
Charles B. Curtis (4/27/40), Trustee since 2001
Mr. Curtis is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Nuclear
Threat Initiative (a private foundation dealing with national security
issues) and serves as Senior Advisor to the United Nations Foundation.
Mr. Curtis is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the
Trustee Advisory Council of the Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns
Hopkins University. Until 2003, Mr. Curtis was a member of the Electric
Power Research Institute Advisory Council and the University of Chicago
Board of Governors for Argonne National Laboratory. Prior to 2002, Mr.
Curtis was a Member of the Board of Directors of the Gas Technology
Institute and the Board of Directors of the Environment and Natural
Resources Program Steering Committee, John F. Kennedy School of
Government, Harvard University. Until 2001, Mr. Curtis was a member of
the Department of Defense Policy Board and Director of EG&G Technical
Services, Inc. (a fossil energy research and development support
company).
From August 1997 to December 1999, Mr. Curtis was a Partner at Hogan &
Hartson L.L.P., a Washington, D.C. law firm. Prior to May 1997, Mr.
Curtis was Deputy Secretary of Energy. He served as Chairman of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 1977 to 1981 and has held
positions on the staff of the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S.
Treasury Department, and the SEC.
Myra R. Drucker (1/16/48), Trustee since 2004
Ms. Drucker is a Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Sarah Lawrence
College, a Trustee of Commonfund (a not-for-profit firm specializing in
asset management for educational endowments and foundations) and a
member of the Investment Committee of the Kresge Foundation (a
charitable trust). She is also an ex-officio member of the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) Pension Managers Advisory Committee, having served
as Chair for seven years and a member of the Executive Committee of the
Committee on Investment of Employee Benefit Assets. She is Chair of the
Advisory Board of Hamilton Lane Advisors (an investment management firm)
and a member of the Advisory Board of RCM (an investment management
firm). Until August 31, 2004, Ms. Drucker was Managing Director and a
member of the Board of Directors of General Motors Asset Management and
Chief Investment Officer of General Motors Trust Bank. Ms. Drucker also
served as a member of the NYSE Corporate Accountability and Listing
Standards Committee and the NYSE/NASD IPO Advisory Committee.
Prior to joining General Motors Asset Management in 2001, Ms. Drucker
held various executive positions in the investment management industry.
Ms. Drucker served as Chief Investment Officer of Xerox Corporation (a
technology and service company in the document industry), where she was
responsible for the investment of the company's pension assets. Ms.
Drucker was also Staff Vice President and Director of Trust Investments
for International Paper (a paper, paper distribution, packaging and
forest products company) and previously served as Manager of Trust
Investments for Xerox Corporation. Ms. Drucker received a B.A. degree in
Literature and Psychology from Sarah Lawrence College and pursued
graduate studies in economics, statistics and portfolio theory at Temple
University.
John A. Hill (1/31/42), Trustee since 1985 and Chairman since 2000
Mr. Hill is Vice Chairman of First Reserve Corporation, a private equity
buyout firm that specializes in energy investments in the diversified
worldwide energy industry.
Mr. Hill is a Director of Devon Energy Corporation, TransMontaigne Oil
Company, Continuum Health Partners of New York and various private
companies controlled by First Reserve Corporation, as well as a Trustee
of TH Lee, Putnam Investment Trust (a closed-end investment company
advised by an affiliate of Putnam Management). He is also a Trustee of
Sarah Lawrence College.
Prior to acquiring First Reserve Corporation in 1983, Mr. Hill held
executive positions in investment banking and investment management with
several firms and with the federal government, including Deputy
Associate Director of the Office of Management and Budget and Deputy
Director of the Federal Energy Administration. He is active in various
business associations, including the Economic Club of New York, and
lectures on energy issues in the United States and Europe. Mr. Hill
holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Southern Methodist University and
pursued graduate studies there as a Woodrow Wilson Fellow.
Ronald J. Jackson (12/17/43), Trustee since 1996
Mr. Jackson is a private investor.
Mr. Jackson is President of the Kathleen and Ronald J. Jackson
Foundation (a charitable trust). He is also a member of the Board of
Overseers of WGBH (a public television and radio station) and was,
through 2004, a member of the Board of Overseers of the Peabody Essex
Museum.
Mr. Jackson is the former Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Fisher-Price, Inc. (a major toy manufacturer), from which he
retired in 1993. He previously served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Stride-Rite, Inc. (a manufacturer and distributor of
footwear) and of Kenner Parker Toys, Inc. (a major toy and game
manufacturer). Mr. Jackson was President of Talbots, Inc. (a distributor
of women's apparel) and has held financial and marketing positions with
General Mills, Inc. and Parker Brothers (a toy and game company). Mr.
Jackson is a graduate of Michigan State University Business School.
Paul L. Joskow (6/30/47), Trustee since 1997
Dr. Joskow is the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics and
Management, and Director of the Center for Energy and Environmental
Policy Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dr. Joskow serves as a Director of National Grid Transco (a UK-based
holding company with interests in electric and gas transmission and
distribution and telecommunications infrastructure) and TransCanada
Corporation (an energy company focused on natural gas transmission and
power services). Prior to February 2005, he served on the board of the
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (a non-profit research
institution) and has been President of the Yale University Council
since 1993. Prior to February 2002, he was a Director of State Farm
Indemnity Company (an automobile insurance company), and, prior to March
2000, he was a Director of New England Electric System (a public utility
holding company).
Dr. Joskow has published five books and numerous articles on topics in
industrial organization, government regulation of industry, and
competition policy. He is active in industry restructuring,
environmental, energy, competition and privatization policies -- serving
as an advisor to governments and corporations worldwide. Dr. Joskow
holds a Ph.D. and M. Phil from Yale University and a B.A. from Cornell
University.
Elizabeth T. Kennan (2/25/38), Trustee since 1992
Dr. Kennan is a Partner of Cambus-Kenneth Farm (thoroughbred horse and
cattle breeding). She is President Emeritus of Mount Holyoke College.
Dr. Kennan served as Chairman and is now Lead Director of Northeast
Utilities and is a Director of Talbots, Inc. She has served as Director
on a number of other boards, including Bell Atlantic, Chastain Real
Estate, Shawmut Bank, Berkshire Life Insurance and Kentucky Home Life
Insurance. She is a Trustee of the National Trust for Historic
Preservation, of Centre College and of Midway College in Midway,
Kentucky. She is also a member of The Trustees of Reservations. Dr.
Kennan has served on the oversight committee of the Folger Shakespeare
Library, as President of Five Colleges Incorporated, as a Trustee of
Notre Dame University and is active in various educational and civic
associations.
As a member of the faculty of Catholic University for twelve years,
until 1978, Dr. Kennan directed the post-doctoral program in Patristic
and Medieval Studies, taught history and published numerous articles.
Dr. Kennan holds a Ph.D. from the University of Washington in Seattle,
an M.S. from St. Hilda's College at Oxford University and an A.B. from
Mount Holyoke College. She holds several honorary doctorates.
John H. Mullin, III (6/15/41), Trustee since 1997
Mr. Mullin is the Chairman and CEO of Ridgeway Farm (a limited liability
company engaged in timber and farming).
Mr. Mullin serves as a Director of The Liberty Corporation (a
broadcasting company), Progress Energy, Inc. (a utility company,
formerly known as Carolina Power & Light) and Sonoco Products, Inc. (a
packaging company). Mr. Mullin is Trustee Emeritus of The National
Humanities Center and Washington & Lee University, where he served as
Chairman of the Investment Committee. Prior to May 2001, he was a
Director of Graphic Packaging International Corp. Prior to February
2004, he was a Director of Alex Brown Realty, Inc.
Mr. Mullin is also a past Director of Adolph Coors Company; ACX
Technologies, Inc.; Crystal Brands, Inc.; Dillon, Read & Co., Inc.;
Fisher-Price, Inc.; and The Ryland Group, Inc. Mr. Mullin is a graduate
of Washington & Lee University and The Wharton Graduate School,
University of Pennsylvania.
Robert E. Patterson (3/15/45), Trustee since 1984
Mr. Patterson is Senior Partner of Cabot Properties, L.P. and Chairman
of Cabot Properties, Inc. (a private equity firm investing in commercial
real estate).
Mr. Patterson serves as Chairman Emeritus and Trustee of the Joslin
Diabetes Center and as a Director of Brandywine Trust Group, LLC. Prior
to June 2003, he was a Trustee of Sea Education Association. Prior to
December 2001, he was President and Trustee of Cabot Industrial Trust (a
publicly traded real estate investment trust). Prior to February 1998,
he was Executive Vice President and Director of Acquisitions of Cabot
Partners Limited Partnership (a registered investment adviser involved
in institutional real estate investments). Prior to 1990, he served as
Executive Vice President of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Realty Advisors, Inc.
(the predecessor company of Cabot Partners).
Mr. Patterson practiced law and held various positions in state
government and was the founding Executive Director of the Massachusetts
Industrial Finance Agency. Mr. Patterson is a graduate of Harvard
College and Harvard Law School.
W. Thomas Stephens (9/2/42), Trustee since 1997
Mr. Stephens is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Boise Cascade,
L.L.C. (a paper, forest products and timberland assets company).
Mr. Stephens serves as a Director of TransCanada Pipelines Limited.
Until 2004, Mr. Stephens was a Director of Xcel Energy Incorporated (a
public utility company), Qwest Communications, and Norske Canada, Inc.
(a paper manufacturer). Until 2003, Mr. Stephens was a Director of
Mail-Well, Inc. (a diversified printing company). He served as Chairman
of Mail-Well until 2001 and as CEO of MacMillan- Bloedel, Ltd. (a forest
products company) until 1999.
Prior to 1996, Mr. Stephens was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Johns Manville Corporation. He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees from the
University of Arkansas.
Richard B. Worley (11/15/45), Trustee since 2004
Mr. Worley is Managing Partner of Permit Capital, LLC, an investment
management firm.
Mr. Worley serves on the Executive Committee of the University of
Pennsylvania Medical Center, is a Trustee of The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation (a philanthropic organization devoted to health care issues)
and is a Director of The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation (a historical
preservation organization). Mr. Worley also serves on the investment
committees of Mount Holyoke College and World Wildlife Fund (a wildlife
conservation organization).
Prior to joining Permit Capital LLC in 2002, Mr. Worley served as Chief
Strategic Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management. He previously
served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment
Officer of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Investment Management and as a
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley, a financial services firm. Mr.
Worley also was the Chairman of Miller Anderson & Sherrerd, an
investment management firm.
Mr. Worley holds a B.S. degree from University of Tennessee and pursued
graduate studies in economics at the University of Texas.
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.* (10/29/48), Trustee since 2004
Mr. Haldeman is President and Chief Executive Officer of Putnam, LLC
("Putnam Investments"). He is a member of Putnam Investments' Executive
Board of Directors and Advisory Council. Prior to November 2003, Mr.
Haldeman served as Co-Head of Putnam Investments' Investment Division.
Prior to joining Putnam Investments in 2002, Mr. Haldeman held executive
positions in the investment management industry. He previously served as
Chief Executive Officer of Delaware Investments and President & Chief
Operating Officer of United Asset Management. Mr. Haldeman was also a
partner and director of Cooke & Bieler, Inc. (an investment management
firm).
Mr. Haldeman currently serves as a Trustee of Dartmouth College and as
Emeritus Trustee of Abington Memorial Hospital. He is a graduate of
Dartmouth College, Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. Mr.
Haldeman is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charterholder.
George Putnam, III* (8/10/51), Trustee since 1984 and President
since 2000
Mr. Putnam is President of New Generation Research, Inc. (a publisher of
financial advisory and other research services), and of New Generation
Advisers, Inc. (a registered investment advisor to private funds). Mr.
Putnam founded the New Generation companies in 1986.
Mr. Putnam is a Director of The Boston Family Office, LLC (a registered
investment adviser). He is a Trustee of St. Mark's School, Shore Country
Day School, and until 2002 was a Trustee of the Sea Education
Association.
Mr. Putnam previously worked as an attorney with the law firm of Dechert
LLP (formerly known as Dechert Price & Rhoads) in Philadelphia. He is a
graduate of Harvard College, Harvard Business School and Harvard Law
School.
The address of each Trustee is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.
As of April 30, 2005, there were 107 Putnam Funds. All Trustees serve as
Trustees of all Putnam funds.
Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until his or her
resignation, retirement at age 72, death, or removal.
* Trustees who are or may be deemed to be "interested persons" (as
defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940) of the fund, Putnam
Management, Putnam Retail Management, or Marsh & McLennan Companies,
Inc., the parent company of Putnam, LLC and its affiliated companies.
Messrs. Haldeman and Putnam III are deemed "interested persons" by
virtue of their positions as officers of the fund, Putnam Management or
Putnam Retail Management and as shareholders of Marsh & McLennan
Companies, Inc. Mr. Putnam, III is the President of your fund and each
of the other Putnam funds. Mr. Haldeman is President and Chief Executive
Officer of Putnam Investments.
Officers
In addition to George Putnam, III, the other officers of the
fund are shown below:
Charles E. Porter (7/26/38)
Executive Vice President, Associate Treasurer and Principal
Executive Officer
Since 1989
Jonathan S. Horwitz (6/4/55)
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Since 2004
Prior to 2004, Managing Director,
Putnam Investments
Steven D. Krichmar (6/27/58)
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
Since 2002
Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments. Prior to July
2001, Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Michael T. Healy (1/24/58)
Assistant Treasurer and Principal
Accounting Officer
Since 2000
Managing Director, Putnam Investments
Beth S. Mazor (4/6/58)
Vice President
Since 2002
Senior Vice President, Putnam Investments
Daniel T. Gallagher (2/27/62)
Senior Vice President, Staff Counsel and Compliance Liaison
Since 2004
Prior to 2004, Associate, Ropes & Gray LLP; prior to 2000,
Law Clerk, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Francis J. McNamara, III (8/19/55)
Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Since 2004
Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments, Putnam Management and
Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2004, General Counsel, State
Street Research & Management Company
James P. Pappas (2/24/53)
Vice President
Since 2004
Managing Director, Putnam Investments and Putnam Management.
During 2002, Chief Operating Officer, Atalanta/Sosnoff
Management Corporation; prior to 2001, President and Chief
Executive Officer, UAM Investment Services, Inc.
Richard S. Robie, III (3/30/60)
Vice President
Since 2004
Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments, Putnam Management and
Putnam Retail Management. Prior to 2003, Senior Vice President,
United Asset Management Corporation
Charles A. Ruys de Perez (10/17/57)
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer
Since 2004
Managing Director, Putnam Investments
Mark C. Trenchard (6/5/62)
Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer
Since 2002
Senior Vice President, Putnam Investments
Judith Cohen (6/7/45)
Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer
Since 1993
The address of each Officer is One Post Office Square,
Boston, MA 02109.
Fund information
About Putnam Investments
One of the largest mutual fund families in the United States, Putnam
Investments has a heritage of investment leadership dating back to Judge
Samuel Putnam, whose Prudent Man Rule has defined fiduciary tradition
and practice since 1830. Founded over 65 years ago, Putnam Investments
was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is
the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We presently manage
over 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and
international.
Investment Manager
Putnam Investment
Management, LLC
One Post Office Square
Boston, MA 02109
Marketing Services
Putnam Retail Management
One Post Office Square
Boston, MA 02109
Custodian
Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company
Legal Counsel
Ropes & Gray LLP
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Trustees
John A. Hill, Chairman
Jameson Adkins Baxter
Charles B. Curtis
Myra R. Drucker
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr.
Ronald J. Jackson
Paul L. Joskow
Elizabeth T. Kennan
John H. Mullin, III
Robert E. Patterson
George Putnam, III
W. Thomas Stephens
Richard B. Worley
Officers
George Putnam, III
President
Charles E. Porter
Executive Vice President,
Associate Treasurer and
Principal Executive Officer
Jonathan S. Horwitz
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
Steven D. Krichmar
Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer
Michael T. Healy
Assistant Treasurer and
Principal Accounting Officer
Beth S. Mazor
Vice President
Daniel T. Gallagher
Senior Vice President,
Staff Counsel and Compliance Liaison
James P. Pappas
Vice President
Richard S. Robie, III
Vice President
Mark C. Trenchard
Vice President and BSA Compliance Officer
Francis J. McNamara, III
Vice President and Chief Legal Officer
Charles A. Ruys de Perez
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer
Judith Cohen
Vice President, Clerk and Assistant Treasurer
Call 1-800-225-1581 weekdays from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time, or
visit our Web site (www.putnaminvestments.com) any time for up-to-date
information about the fund's NAV.
[LOGO OMITTED]
PUTNAM INVESTMENTS
The Putnam Funds
One Post Office Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
PRSRT STD
U.S. POSTAGE PAID
PUTNAM
INVESTMENTS
Do you want to save paper and receive this document faster?
Shareholders can sign up for email delivery of shareholder reports on
www.putnaminvestments.com.
225024 6/05
Item 2. Code of Ethics:
-----------------------
(a) All officers of the Fund, including its principal executive, financial and
accounting officers, are employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC,
the Fund's investment manager. As such they are subject to a comprehensive
Code of Ethics adopted and administered by Putnam Investments which is
designed to protect the interests of the firm and its clients. The Fund
has adopted a Code of Ethics which incorporates the Code of Ethics of
Putnam Investments with respect to all of its officers and Trustees who are
employees of Putnam Investment Management, LLC. For this reason, the Fund
has not adopted a separate code of ethics governing its principal
executive, financial and accounting officers.
(c) In July 2004, Putnam Investment Management, LLC, the Fund's investment
manager, Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership, the Fund's principal
underwriter, and Putnam Investments Limited, the sub-manager for a portion
of the assets of certain funds as determined by Putnam Management from time
to time, adopted several amendments to their Code of Ethics. Some of these
amendments were adopted as a result of Putnam Investment Management's
partial settlement order with the SEC on November 13, 2003. Insofar as such
Code of Ethics applies to the Fund's principal executive officer, principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer, the amendments provided
for the following: (i) a 90-day blackout period for all shares of Putnam
open-end funds (except for money market funds) purchased or sold (including
exchanges into or out of a fund) by Putnam employees and certain family
members; (ii) a one-year holding period for all access persons that operates
in the same manner as the 90-day rule; (iii) delivery by Putnam employees to
the Code of Ethics Administrator of both quarterly account statements for
all brokerage accounts (irrespective of activity in the accounts) and
account statements for any Putnam funds not held at Putnam or for any funds
sub-advised by Putnam; (iv) a prohibition of Putnam employees from making
more than 25 trades in individual securities in their personal accounts in
any given quarter; (v) the extension of the existing prohibition of access
persons from a purchase and sale or sale and purchase of an individual
security within 60 days to include trading based on tax-lot election; (vi)
the inclusion of trades in Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (ultimate parent
company of Putnam Investment Management) securities in pre-clearance and
reporting requirements; (vii) a prohibition of limit and good-until-canceled
orders as inconsistent with the requirements of daily pre-clearance; (viii)
new limits and procedures for accounts managed by outside managers and
brokers, in order for trading in such accounts to be exempt from
pre-clearance requirements; (ix) a new gift and entertainment policy that
imposes a reporting obligation on all meals and entertainment and new limits
on non-meal entertainment; (x) a number of alternatives for the reporting of
irregular activity.
In December 2004, additional amendments to the Code of Ethics were adopted.
Insofar as such Code of Ethics applies to the Fund's principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, the
amendments provided for the following: (i) implementation of minimum
monetary sanctions for violations of the Code; (ii) expansion of the
definition of "access person" under the Code to include all Putnam employees
with access to non-public information regarding Putnam-managed mutual fund
portfolio holdings; (iii) lengthening the period during which access persons
are required to complete quarterly reports; (iv) reducing the maximum number
of trades than can be made by Putnam employees in their personal accounts in
any calendar quarter from 25 trades to 10 trades; and (v) lengthening the
required holding period for securities by access persons from 60 days to 90
days.
In March 2005, additional amendments to the Code of Ethics were adopted,
that went into effect on April 1, 2005. Insofar as such Code of Ethics
applies to the Fund's principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer, the amendments (i) prohibit Putnam
employees and their immediate family members from having any direct or
indirect personal financial interest in companies that do business with
Putnam (excluding investment holdings in public companies that are not
material to the employee), unless such interest is disclosed and approved by
the Code of Ethics Officer; (ii) prohibit Putnam employees from using Putnam
assets, letterhead or other resources in making political or campaign
contributions, solicitations or endorsements;(iii) require Putnam employees
to obtain pre-clearance of personal political or campaign contributions or
other gifts to government officials or political candidates in certain
jurisdictions and to officials or candidates with whom Putnam has or is
seeking to establish a business relationship and (iv) require Putnam
employees to obtain pre-approval from Putnam's Director of Government
Relations prior to engaging in lobbying activities.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
-----------------------------------------
The Funds' Audit and Pricing Committee is comprised solely of Trustees
who are "independent" (as such term has been defined by the Securities
and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in regulations implementing Section 407
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the "Regulations")). The Trustees believe
that each of the members of the Audit and Pricing Committee also possess
a combination of knowledge and experience with respect to financial
accounting matters, as well as other attributes, that qualify them for
service on the Committee. In addition, the Trustees have determined
that all members of the Funds' Audit and Pricing Committee meet the
financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange's rules
and that Mr. Patterson, Mr. Stephens and Mr. Worley qualify as "audit
committee financial experts" (as such term has been defined by the
Regulations) based on their review of their pertinent experience and
education. Certain other Trustees, although not on the Audit and Pricing
Committee, would also qualify as "audit committee financial experts."
The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person
as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form
N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability
that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on
such person as a member of the Audit and Pricing Committee and the Board
of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
-----------------------------------------------
The following table presents fees billed in each of the last two fiscal
years for services rendered to the fund by the fund's independent auditors:
Audit Audit-Related Tax All Other
Fiscal year ended Fees Fees Fees Fees
----------------- ---------- ------------- ------- ---------
April 30, 2005 $39,378 $26,478 $5,074 $--
April 30, 2004 $34,631 $24,241 $4,667 $8
For the fiscal years ended April 30, 2005 and April 30, 2004, the fund's
independent auditors billed aggregate non-audit fees in the amounts of $
215,155 and $169,746 respectively, to the fund, Putnam Management and any
entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam
Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.
Audit Fees represents fees billed for the fund's last two fiscal years.
Audit-Related Fees represents fees billed in the fund's last two fiscal
years for services traditionally performed by the fund's auditor, including
accounting consultation for proposed transactions or concerning financial
accounting and reporting standards and other audit or attest services not
required by statute or regulation.
Tax Fees represent fees billed in the fund's last two fiscal years for tax
compliance, tax planning and tax advice services. Tax planning and tax
advice services include assistance with tax audits, employee benefit plans
and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
All Other Fees Fees represent fees billed for services relating to
calculation of investment performance.
Pre-Approval Policies of the Audit and Pricing Committee. The Audit and
Pricing Committee of the Putnam funds has determined that, as a matter of
policy, all work performed for the funds by the funds' independent auditors
will be pre-approved by the Committee and will generally not be subject to
pre-approval procedures.
Under certain circumstances, the Audit and Pricing Committee believes that
it may be appropriate for Putnam Investment Management, LLC ("Putnam
Management") and certain of its affiliates to engage the services of the
funds' independent auditors, but only after prior approval by the Committee.
Such requests are required to be submitted in writing to the Committee and
explain, among other things, the nature of the proposed engagement, the
estimated fees, and why this work must be performed by that particular audit
firm. The Committee will review the proposed engagement at its next
meeting.
Since May 6, 2003, all work performed by the independent auditors for the
funds, Putnam Management and any entity controlling, controlled by or under
common control with Putnam Management that provides ongoing services to the
fund was pre-approved by the Committee or a member of the Committee pursuant
to the pre-approval policies discussed above. Prior to that date, the
Committee had a general policy to pre-approve the independent auditor's
engagements for non-audit services with the funds, Putnam Management and any
entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Putnam
Management that provides ongoing services to the fund.
The following table presents fees billed by the fund's principal auditor for
services required to be approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule
2-01 of Regulation S-X.
Audit-Related Tax All Other Total Non-
Fiscal year ended Fees Fees Fees Audit Fees
----------------- ------------- ---- --------- ----------
April 30, 2005 $-- $-- $-- $--
April 30, 2004 $-- $-- $-- $--
Item 5. Audit Committee
------------------------
(a) The fund has a separately-designated audit committee
established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Audit Committee of the fund's
Board of Trustees is composed of the following persons:
Myra R. Drucker
Paul L. Joskow (Chairperson)
Robert E. Patterson
W. Thomas Stephens
Richard B. Worley
(b) Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments: Not applicable
--------------------------------
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management Investment Companies:
--------------------------------
Proxy voting guidelines of the Putnam funds
-------------------------------------------
The proxy voting guidelines below summarize the funds' positions on
various issues of concern to investors, and give a general
indication of how fund portfolio securities will be voted on
proposals dealing with particular issues. The funds' proxy voting
service is instructed to vote all proxies relating to fund portfolio
securities in accordance with these guidelines, except as otherwise
instructed by the Proxy Coordinator, a member of the Office of the
Trustees who is appointed to assist in the coordination and voting
of the funds' proxies.
The proxy voting guidelines are just that - guidelines. The
guidelines are not exhaustive and do not include all potential
voting issues. Because proxy issues and the circumstances of
individual companies are so varied, there may be instances when the
funds may not vote in strict adherence to these guidelines. For
example, the proxy voting service is expected to bring to the Proxy
Coordinator's attention proxy questions that are company-specific
and of a non-routine nature and that, even if covered by the
guidelines, may be more appropriately handled on a case-by-case
basis.
Similarly, Putnam Management's investment professionals, as part of
their ongoing review and analysis of all fund portfolio holdings,
are responsible for monitoring significant corporate developments,
including proxy proposals submitted to shareholders, and notifying
the Proxy Coordinator of circumstances where the interests of fund
shareholders may warrant a vote contrary to these guidelines. In
such instances, the investment professionals will submit a written
recommendation to the Proxy Coordinator and the person or persons
designated by Putnam Management's Legal and Compliance Department to
assist in processing referral items pursuant to the funds' "Proxy
Voting Procedures." The Proxy Coordinator, in consultation with the
funds' Senior Vice President, Executive Vice President, and/or the
Chair of the Board Policy and Nominating Committee, as appropriate,
will determine how the funds' proxies will be voted. When
indicated, the Chair of the Board Policy and Nominating Committee
may consult with other members of the Committee or the full Board of
Trustees.
The following guidelines are grouped according to the types of
proposals generally presented to shareholders. Part I deals with
proposals that have been put forth by management and approved and
recommended by a company's board of directors. Part II deals with
proposals submitted by shareholders for inclusion in proxy
statements. Part III addresses unique considerations pertaining to
non-U.S. issuers.
The Putnam funds will disclose their proxy votes in accordance with
the timetable established by SEC rules (i.e., not later than August
31 of each year for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30).
I. BOARD-APPROVED PROPOSALS
----------------------------
The vast majority of matters presented to shareholders for a vote
involve proposals made by a company itself (sometimes referred to as
"management proposals"), which have been approved and recommended by
its board of directors. In view of the enhanced corporate
governance practices currently being implemented in public companies
and of the funds' intent to hold corporate boards accountable for
their actions in promoting shareholder interests, the funds' proxies
generally will be voted for the decisions reached by majority
independent boards of directors, except as otherwise indicated in
these guidelines. Accordingly, the funds' proxies will be voted for
board-approved proposals, except as follows:
Matters relating to the Board of Directors
------------------------------------------
Uncontested Election of Directors
The funds' proxies will be voted for the election of a company's
nominees for the board of directors, except as follows:
The funds will withhold votes for the entire board of directors if
* the board does not have a majority of independent directors,
* the board has not established independent nominating, audit, and
compensation committees,
* the board has more than 19 members or fewer than five members,
absent special circumstances,
* the board has not acted to implement a policy requested in a
shareholder proposal that received the support of a majority of the
shares of the company at its previous two annual meetings, or
* the board has adopted or renewed a shareholder rights plan
(commonly referred to as a "poison pill") without shareholder
approval during the current or prior calendar year.
The funds will withhold votes for any nominee for director who:
* is considered an independent director by the company and who has
received compensation from the company other than for service as a
director (e.g., investment banking, consulting, legal, or financial
advisory fees),
* attends less than 75% of board and committee meetings without
valid reasons for the absences (e.g., illness, personal emergency,
etc.),
* as a director of a public company (Company A), is employed as a
senior executive of another public company (Company B) if a director
of Company B serves as a senior executive of Company A (commonly
referred to as an "interlocking directorate"), or
* serves on more than five unaffiliated public company boards (for
the purpose of this guideline, boards of affiliated registered
investment companies will count as one board).
Commentary:
Board independence: Unless otherwise indicated, for the purposes of
determining whether a board has a majority of independent directors
and independent nominating, audit, and compensation committees, an
"independent director" is a director who (1) meets all requirements
to serve as an independent director of a company under the final
NYSE Corporate Governance Rules (e.g., no material business
relationships with the company and no present or recent employment
relationship with the company (including employment of an immediate
family member as an executive officer)), and (2) has not accepted
directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory, or other
compensatory fee from the company other than in his or her capacity
as a member of the board of directors or any board committee. The
funds' Trustees believe that the receipt of compensation for
services other than service as a director raises significant
independence issues.
Board size: The funds' Trustees believe that the size of the board
of directors can have a direct impact on the ability of the board to
govern effectively. Boards that have too many members can be
unwieldy and ultimately inhibit their ability to oversee management
performance. Boards that have too few members can stifle innovation
and lead to excessive influence by management.
Time commitment: Being a director of a company requires a
significant time commitment to adequately prepare for and attend the
company's board and committee meetings. Directors must be able to
commit the time and attention necessary to perform their fiduciary
duties in proper fashion, particularly in times of crisis. The
funds' Trustees are concerned about over-committed directors. In
some cases, directors may serve on too many boards to make a
meaningful contribution. This may be particularly true for senior
executives of public companies (or other directors with
substantially full-time employment) who serve on more than a few
outside boards. The funds may withhold votes from such directors on
a case-by-case basis where it appears that they may be unable to
discharge their duties properly because of excessive commitments.
Interlocking directorships: The funds' Trustees believe that
interlocking directorships are inconsistent with the degree of
independence required for outside directors of public companies.
Corporate governance practices: Board independence depends not only
on its members' individual relationships, but also on the board's
overall attitude toward management. Independent boards are
committed to good corporate governance practices and, by providing
objective independent judgment, enhancing shareholder value. The
funds may withhold votes on a case-by-case basis from some or all
directors who, through their lack of independence, have failed to
observe good corporate governance practices or, through specific
corporate action, have demonstrated a disregard for the interest of
shareholders.
Contested Elections of Directors
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis in contested elections
of directors.
Classified Boards
The funds will vote against proposals to classify a board, absent
special circumstances indicating that shareholder interests would be
better served by this structure.
Commentary: Under a typical classified board structure, the
directors are divided into three classes, with each class serving a
three-year term. The classified board structure results in
directors serving staggered terms, with usually only a third of the
directors up for re-election at any given annual meeting. The
funds' Trustees generally believe that it is appropriate for
directors to stand for election each year, but recognize that, in
special circumstances, shareholder interests may be better served
under a classified board structure.
Other Board-Related Proposals
The funds will generally vote for board-approved proposals that have
been approved by a majority independent board, and on a case-by-case
basis on board-approved proposals where the board fails to meet the
guidelines' basic independence standards (i.e., majority of
independent directors and independent nominating, audit, and
compensation committees).
Executive Compensation
----------------------
The funds generally favor compensation programs that relate
executive compensation to a company's long-term performance. The
funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on board-approved proposals
relating to executive compensation, except as follows:
Except where the funds are otherwise withholding votes for the
entire board of directors, the funds will vote for stock option and
restricted stock plans that will result in an average annual
dilution of 1.67% or less (based on the disclosed term of the plan
and including all equity-based plans).
The funds will vote against stock option and restricted stock
plans that will result in an average annual dilution of greater than
1.67% (based on the disclosed term of the plan and including all
equity-based plans).
The funds will vote against any stock option or restricted stock
plan where the company's actual grants of stock options and
restricted stock under all equity-based compensation plans during
the prior three (3) fiscal years have resulted in an average annual
dilution of greater than 1.67%.
The funds will vote against stock option plans that permit the
replacing or repricing of underwater options (and against any
proposal to authorize such replacement or repricing of underwater
options).
The funds will vote against stock option plans that permit
issuance of options with an exercise price below the stock's current
market price.
Except where the funds are otherwise withholding votes for the
entire board of directors, the funds will vote for an employee stock
purchase plan that has the following features: (1) the shares
purchased under the plan are acquired for no less than 85% of their
market value; (2) the offering period under the plan is 27 months or
less; and (3) dilution is 10% or less.
Commentary: Companies should have compensation programs that are
reasonable and that align shareholder and management interests over
the longer term. Further, disclosure of compensation programs
should provide absolute transparency to shareholders regarding the
sources and amounts of, and the factors influencing, executive
compensation. Appropriately designed equity-based compensation
plans can be an effective way to align the interests of long-term
shareholders with the interests of management. The funds may vote
against executive compensation proposals on a case-by-case basis
where compensation is excessive by reasonable corporate standards,
or where a company fails to provide transparent disclosure of
executive compensation. In voting on a proposal relating to
executive compensation, the funds will consider whether the proposal
has been approved by an independent compensation committee of the
board.
Capitalization
--------------
Many proxy proposals involve changes in a company's capitalization,
including the authorization of additional stock, the issuance of
stock, the repurchase of outstanding stock, or the approval of a
stock split. The management of a company's capital structure
involves a number of important issues, including cash flow,
financing needs, and market conditions that are unique to the
circumstances of the company. As a result, the funds will vote on a
case-by-case basis on board-approved proposals involving changes to
a company's capitalization, except that where the funds are not
otherwise withholding votes from the entire board of directors:
The funds will vote for proposals relating to the authorization
and issuance of additional common stock (except where such proposals
relate to a specific transaction).
The funds will vote for proposals to effect stock splits
(excluding reverse stock splits).
The funds will vote for proposals authorizing share repurchase
programs.
Commentary: A company may decide to authorize additional shares of
common stock for reasons relating to executive compensation or for
routine business purposes. For the most part, these decisions are
best left to the board of directors and senior management. The
funds will vote on a case-by-case basis, however, on other proposals
to change a company's capitalization, including the authorization of
common stock with special voting rights, the authorization or
issuance of common stock in connection with a specific transaction
(e.g., an acquisition, merger or reorganization), or the
authorization or issuance of preferred stock. Actions such as these
involve a number of considerations that may affect a shareholder's
investment and that warrant a case-by-case determination.
Acquisitions, Mergers, Reincorporations, Reorganizations and Other
------------------------------------------------------------------
Transactions
------------
Shareholders may be confronted with a number of different types of
transactions, including acquisitions, mergers, reorganizations
involving business combinations, liquidations, and the sale of all
or substantially all of a company's assets, which may require their
consent. Voting on such proposals involves considerations unique to
each transaction. As a result, the funds will vote on a
case-by-case basis on board-approved proposals to effect these types
of transactions, except as follows:
The funds will vote for mergers and reorganizations involving
business combinations designed solely to reincorporate a company in
Delaware.
Commentary: A company may reincorporate into another state through
a merger or reorganization by setting up a "shell" company in a
different state and then merging the company into the new company.
While reincorporation into states with extensive and established
corporate laws - notably Delaware - provides companies and
shareholders with a more well-defined legal framework, shareholders
must carefully consider the reasons for a reincorporation into
another jurisdiction, including especially an offshore jurisdiction.
Anti-Takeover Measures
----------------------
Some proxy proposals involve efforts by management to make it more
difficult for an outside party to take control of the company
without the approval of the company's board of directors. These
include the adoption of a shareholder rights plan, requiring
supermajority voting on particular issues, the adoption of fair
price provisions, the issuance of blank check preferred stock, and
the creation of a separate class of stock with disparate voting
rights. Such proposals may adversely affect shareholder rights,
lead to management entrenchment, or create conflicts of interest.
As a result, the funds will vote against board-approved proposals to
adopt such anti-takeover measures, except as follows:
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals to ratify
or approve shareholder rights plans; and
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals to adopt
fair price provisions.
Commentary: The funds' Trustees recognize that poison pills and
fair price provisions may enhance shareholder value under certain
circumstances. As a result, the funds will consider proposals to
approve such matters on a case-by-case basis.
Other Business Matters
----------------------
Many proxies involve approval of routine business matters, such as
changing a company's name, ratifying the appointment of auditors,
and procedural matters relating to the shareholder meeting. For the
most part, these routine matters do not materially affect
shareholder interests and are best left to the board of directors
and senior management of the company. The funds will vote for
board-approved proposals approving such matters, except as follows:
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals to amend
a company's charter or bylaws (except for charter amendments
necessary or to effect stock splits to change a company's name or to
authorize additional shares of common stock).
The funds will vote against authorization to transact other
unidentified, substantive business at the meeting.
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on other business
matters where the funds are otherwise withholding votes for the
entire board of directors.
Commentary: Charter and bylaw amendments and the transaction of
other unidentified, substantive business at a shareholder meeting
may directly affect shareholder rights and have a significant impact
on shareholder value. As a result, the funds do not view such items
as routine business matters. Putnam Management's investment
professionals and the funds' proxy voting service may also bring to
the Proxy Coordinator's attention company-specific items that they
believe to be non-routine and warranting special consideration.
Under these circumstances, the funds will vote on a case-by-case
basis.
II. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
--------------------------
SEC regulations permit shareholders to submit proposals for
inclusion in a company's proxy statement. These proposals generally
seek to change some aspect of the company's corporate governance
structure or to change some aspect of its business operations. The
funds generally will vote in accordance with the recommendation of
the company's board of directors on all shareholder proposals,
except as follows:
The funds will vote for shareholder proposals to declassify a
board, absent special circumstances which would indicate that
shareholder interests are better served by a classified board
structure.
The funds will vote for shareholder proposals to require
shareholder approval of shareholder rights plans.
The funds will vote for shareholder proposals that are consistent
with the funds' proxy voting guidelines for board-approved
proposals.
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on other shareholder
proposals where the funds are otherwise withholding votes for the
entire board of directors.
Commentary: In light of the substantial reforms in corporate
governance that are currently underway, the funds' Trustees believe
that effective corporate reforms should be promoted by holding
boards of directors - and in particular their independent directors
- accountable for their actions, rather than imposing additional
legal restrictions on board governance through piecemeal proposals.
Generally speaking, shareholder proposals relating to business
operations are often motivated primarily by political or social
concerns, rather than the interests of shareholders as investors in
an economic enterprise. As stated above, the funds' Trustees
believe that boards of directors and management are responsible for
ensuring that their businesses are operating in accordance with high
legal and ethical standards and should be held accountable for
resulting corporate behavior. Accordingly, the funds will generally
support the recommendations of boards that meet the basic
independence and governance standards established in these
guidelines. Where boards fail to meet these standards, the funds
will generally evaluate shareholder proposals on a case-by-case
basis.
III. VOTING SHARES OF NON-U.S. ISSUERS
---------------------------------------
Many of the Putnam funds invest on a global basis, and, as a result,
they may be required to vote shares held in non-U.S. issuers - i.e.,
issuers that are incorporated under the laws of foreign
jurisdictions and that are not listed on a U.S. securities exchange
or the NASDAQ stock market. Because non-U.S. issuers are
incorporated under the laws of countries and jurisdictions outside
the U.S., protection for shareholders may vary significantly from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Laws governing non-U.S. issuers may,
in some cases, provide substantially less protection for
shareholders. As a result, the foregoing guidelines, which are
premised on the existence of a sound corporate governance and
disclosure framework, may not be appropriate under some
circumstances for non-U.S. issuers.
In many non-U.S. markets, shareholders who vote proxies of a
non-U.S. issuer are not able to trade in that company's stock on or
around the shareholder meeting date. This practice is known as
"share blocking." In countries where share blocking is practiced,
the funds will vote proxies only with direction from Putnam
Management's investment professionals.
In addition, some non-U.S. markets require that a company's shares
be re-registered out of the name of the local custodian or nominee
into the name of the shareholder for the meeting. This practice is
known as "share re-registration." As a result, shareholders,
including the funds, are not able to trade in that company's stock
until the shares are re-registered back in the name of the local
custodian or nominee. In countries where share re-registration is
practiced, the funds will generally not vote proxies.
The funds will vote proxies of non-U.S. issuers in accordance with
the foregoing guidelines where applicable, except as follows:
Uncontested Election of Directors
---------------------------------
Japan
For companies that have established a U.S.-style corporate
structure, the funds will withhold votes for the entire board of
directors if
* the board does not have a majority of outside directors,
* the board has not established nominating and compensation
committees composed of a majority of outside directors, or
* the board has not established an audit committee composed of a
majority of independent directors.
The funds will withhold votes for the appointment of members of a
company's board of statutory auditors if a majority of the members
of the board of statutory auditors is not independent.
Commentary:
Board structure: Recent amendments to the Japanese Commercial Code
give companies the option to adopt a U.S.-style corporate structure
(i.e., a board of directors and audit, nominating, and compensation
committees). The funds will vote for proposals to amend a company's
articles of incorporation to adopt the U.S.-style corporate
structure.
Definition of outside director and independent director: Corporate
governance principles in Japan focus on the distinction between
outside directors and independent directors. Under these
principles, an outside director is a director who is not and has
never been a director, executive, or employee of the company or its
parent company, subsidiaries or affiliates. An outside director is
"independent" if that person can make decisions completely
independent from the managers of the company, its parent,
subsidiaries, or affiliates and does not have a material
relationship with the company (i.e., major client, trading partner,
or other business relationship; familial relationship with current
director or executive; etc.). The guidelines have incorporated
these definitions in applying the board independence standards
above.
Korea
The funds will withhold votes for the entire board of directors if
* the board does not have a majority of outside directors,
* the board has not established a nominating committee composed of
at least a majority of outside directors, or
* the board has not established an audit committee composed of at
least three members and in which at least two-thirds of its members
are outside directors.
Commentary: For purposes of these guideline, an "outside director"
is a director that is independent from the management or controlling
shareholders of the company, and holds no interests that might
impair performing his or her duties impartially from the company,
management or controlling shareholder. In determining whether a
director is an outside director, the funds will also apply the
standards included in Article 415-2(2) of the Korean Commercial Code
(i.e., no employment relationship with the company for a period of
two years before serving on the committee, no director or employment
relationship with the company's largest shareholder, etc.) and may
consider other business relationships that would affect the
independence of an outside director.
United Kingdom
The funds will withhold votes for the entire board of directors if
* the board does not have at least a majority of independent
non-executive directors,
* the board has not established nomination committees composed of a
majority of independent non-executive directors, or
* the board has not established compensation and audit committees
composed of (1) at least three directors (in the case of smaller
companies, two directors) and (2) solely of independent
non-executive directors.
The funds will withhold votes for any nominee for director who is
considered an independent director by the company and who has
received compensation from the company other than for service as a
director (e.g., investment banking, consulting, legal, or financial
advisory fees).
Commentary:
Application of guidelines: Although the U.K.'s Combined Code on
Corporate Governance ("Combined Code") has adopted the "comply and
explain" approach to corporate governance, the funds' Trustees
believe that the guidelines discussed above with respect to board
independence standards are integral to the protection of investors
in U.K. companies. As a result, these guidelines will be applied in
a prescriptive manner.
Definition of independence: For the purposes of these guidelines, a
non-executive director shall be considered independent if the
director meets the independence standards in section A.3.1 of the
Combined Code (i.e., no material business or employment
relationships with the company, no remuneration from the company for
non-board services, no close family ties with senior employees or
directors of the company, etc.), except that the funds do not view
service on the board for more than nine years as affecting a
director's independence.
Smaller companies: A smaller company is one that is below the FTSE
350 throughout the year immediately prior to the reporting year.
Canada
In January 2004, Canadian securities regulators issued proposed
policies that would impose new corporate governance requirements on
Canadian public companies. The recommended practices contained in
these new corporate governance requirements mirror corporate
governance reforms that have been adopted by the NYSE and other U.S.
national securities exchanges and stock markets. As a result, the
funds will vote on matters relating to the board of directors of
Canadian issuers in accordance with the guidelines applicable to
U.S. issuers.
Commentary: Like the U.K.'s Combined Code, the proposed policies on
corporate governance issued by Canadian securities regulators embody
the "comply and explain" approach to corporate governance. Because
the funds' Trustees believe that the board independence standards
contained in the proxy voting guidelines are integral to the
protection of investors in Canadian companies, these standards will
be applied in a prescriptive manner.
Other Matters
-------------
The funds will vote for shareholder proposals calling for a
majority of a company's directors to be independent of management.
The funds will vote for shareholder proposals seeking to increase
the independence of board nominating, audit, and compensation
committees.
The funds will vote for shareholder proposals that implement
corporate governance standards similar to those established under
U.S. federal law and the listing requirements of U.S. stock
exchanges, and that do not otherwise violate the laws of the
jurisdiction under which the company is incorporated.
The funds will vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals relating
to (1) the issuance of common stock in excess of 20% of the
company's outstanding common stock where shareholders do not have
preemptive rights, or (2) the issuance of common stock in excess of
100% of the company's outstanding common stock where shareholders
have preemptive rights.
As adopted December 10, 2004
Proxy Voting Procedures of the Putnam Funds
-------------------------------------------
The proxy voting procedures below explain the role of the funds' Trustees,
the proxy voting service and the Proxy Coordinator, as well as how the
process will work when a proxy question needs to be handled on a
case-by-case basis, or when there may be a conflict of interest.
The role of the funds' Trustees
-------------------------------------------
The Trustees of the Putnam funds exercise control of the voting of proxies
through their Board Policy and Nominating Committee, which is composed
entirely of independent Trustees. The Board Policy and Nominating Committee
oversees the proxy voting process and participates, as needed, in the
resolution of issues that need to be handled on a case-by-case basis. The
Committee annually reviews and recommends, for Trustee approval, guidelines
governing the funds' proxy votes, including how the funds vote on specific
proposals and which matters are to be considered on a case-by-case basis.
The Trustees are assisted in this process by their independent
administrative staff ("Office of the Trustees"), independent legal counsel,
and an independent proxy voting service. The Trustees also receive
assistance from Putnam Investment Management, LLC ("Putnam Management"), the
funds' investment advisor, on matters involving investment judgments. In
all cases, the ultimate decision on voting proxies rests with the Trustees,
acting as fiduciaries on behalf of the shareholders of the funds.
The role of the proxy voting service
-------------------------------------------
The funds have engaged an independent proxy voting service to assist in the
voting of proxies. The proxy voting service is responsible for coordinating
with the funds' custodians to ensure that all proxy materials received by
the custodians relating to the funds' portfolio securities are processed in
a timely fashion. To the extent applicable, the proxy voting service votes
all proxies in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines established by
the Trustees. The proxy voting service will refer proxy questions to the
Proxy Coordinator (described below) for instructions under circumstances
where: (1) the application of the proxy voting guidelines is unclear; (2) a
particular proxy question is not covered by the guidelines; or (3) the
guidelines call for specific instructions on a case-by-case basis. The
proxy voting service is also requested to call to the Proxy Coordinator's
attention specific proxy questions that, while governed by a guideline,
appear to involve unusual or controversial issues. The funds also utilize
research services relating to proxy questions provided by the proxy voting
service and by other firms.
The role of the Proxy Coordinator
-------------------------------------------
Each year, a member of the Office of the Trustees is appointed Proxy
Coordinator to assist in the coordination and voting of the funds' proxies.
The Proxy Coordinator will deal directly with the proxy voting service and,
in the case of proxy questions referred by the proxy voting service, will
solicit voting recommendations and instructions from the Office of the
Trustees, the Chair of the Board Policy and Nominating Committee, and Putnam
Management's investment professionals, as appropriate. The Proxy
Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that these questions and referrals
are responded to in a timely fashion and for transmitting appropriate voting
instructions to the proxy voting service.
Voting procedures for referral items
-------------------------------------------
As discussed above, the proxy voting service will refer proxy questions to
the Proxy Coordinator under certain circumstances. When the application of
the proxy voting guidelines is unclear or a particular proxy question is not
covered by the guidelines (and does not involve investment considerations),
the Proxy Coordinator will assist in interpreting the guidelines and, as
appropriate, consult with one of more senior staff members of the Office of
the Trustees and the Chair of the Board Policy and Nominating Committee on
how the funds' shares will be voted.
For proxy questions that require a case-by-case analysis pursuant to the
guidelines or that are not covered by the guidelines but involve investment
considerations, the Proxy Coordinator will refer such questions, through a
written request, to Putnam Management's investment professionals for a
voting recommendation. Such referrals will be made in cooperation with the
person or persons designated by Putnam Management's Legal and Compliance
Department to assist in processing such referral items. In connection with
each such referral item, the Legal and Compliance Department will conduct a
conflicts of interest review, as described below under "Conflicts of
Interest," and provide a conflicts of interest report (the "Conflicts
Report") to the Proxy Coordinator describing the results of such review.
After receiving a referral item from the Proxy Coordinator, Putnam
Management's investment professionals will provide a written recommendation
to the Proxy Coordinator and the person or persons designated by the Legal
and Compliance Department to assist in processing referral items. Such
recommendation will set forth (1) how the proxies should be voted; (2) the
basis and rationale for such recommendation; and (3) any contacts the
investment professionals have had with respect to the referral item with
non-investment personnel of Putnam Management or with outside parties
(except for routine communications from proxy solicitors). The Proxy
Coordinator will then review the investment professionals' recommendation
and the Conflicts Report with one of more senior staff members of the Office
of the Trustees in determining how to vote the funds' proxies. The Proxy
Coordinator will maintain a record of all proxy questions that have been
referred to Putnam Management's investment professionals, the voting
recommendation, and the Conflicts Report.
In some situations, the Proxy Coordinator and/or one of more senior staff
members of the Office of the Trustees may determine that a particular proxy
question raises policy issues requiring consultation with the Chair of the
Board Policy and Nominating Committee, who, in turn, may decide to bring the
particular proxy question to the Committee or the full Board of Trustees for
consideration.
Conflicts of interest
-------------------------------------------
Occasions may arise where a person or organization involved in the proxy
voting process may have a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest may
exist, for example, if Putnam Management has a business relationship with
(or is actively soliciting business from) either the company soliciting the
proxy or a third party that has a material interest in the outcome of a
proxy vote or that is actively lobbying for a particular outcome of a proxy
vote. Any individual with knowledge of a personal conflict of interest
(e.g., familial relationship with company management) relating to a
particular referral item shall disclose that conflict to the Proxy
Coordinator and the Legal and Compliance Department and otherwise remove
himself or herself from the proxy voting process. The Legal and Compliance
Department will review each item referred to Putnam Management's investment
professionals to determine if a conflict of interest exists and will provide
the Proxy Coordinator with a Conflicts Report for each referral item that
(1) describes any conflict of interest; (2) discusses the procedures used to
address such conflict of interest; and (3) discloses any contacts from
parties outside Putnam Management (other than routine communications from
proxy solicitors) with respect to the referral item not otherwise reported
in an investment professional's recommendation. The Conflicts Report will
also include written confirmation that any recommendation from an investment
professional provided under circumstances where a conflict of interest
exists was made solely on the investment merits and without regard to any
other consideration.
As adopted March 11, 2005
Item 8. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companies and Affiliated Purchasers: Not applicable
------------------------------------
Item 9. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
------------------------------------------------------------
Not applicable
Item 10. Controls and Procedures:
--------------------------------
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal
financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of
the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of
such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant
in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting:
Not applicable
Item 11. Exhibits:
------------------
(a) The Code of Ethics of The Putnam Funds, which incorporates the
Code of Ethics of Putnam Investments, is filed herewith.
(b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and the officer
certifications as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 are filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NAME OF REGISTRANT
By (Signature and Title): /s/Michael T. Healy
--------------------------
Michael T. Healy
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: June 27, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title): /s/Charles E. Porter
---------------------------
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer
Date: June 27, 2005
By (Signature and Title): /s/Steven D. Krichmar
---------------------------
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer
Date: June 27, 2005