UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

 

x   QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the period ended June 30, 2013

 

o   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

 

For the transition period from _________ to _________

 

Commission file number: 0-27865

 

ICEWEB, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware	13-2640971
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

22900 Shaw Road, Suite 111

Sterling, VA 20166

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

            (571) 287-2380      

(Issuer’s telephone number)

______________________

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes        No   o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes   o     No   o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer		¨		Accelerated filer		¨
Non-accelerated filer		¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes   o     No   

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: At August 14, 2013, there were 355,817,360 outstanding shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes o   No x  

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION

 

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. You should not unduly rely on these statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “project,” “contemplate,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” With respect to any forward-looking statement that includes a statement of its underlying assumptions or bases, we believe such assumptions or bases to be reasonable and have formed them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material depending on the circumstances. When, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results, that expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the stated expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or anyone acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements.

 

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

 

When used in this quarterly report, the terms “IceWEB”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refers to IceWEB, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and our subsidiaries. The information which appears on our web site at www.iceweb.com is not part of this quarterly report.

- 2 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2013

 

INDEX

 

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1 - Consolidated Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) at June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012	4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)      For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	5
	Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income (unaudited)     For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)      For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	7
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	8
	Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	27
	Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	35
	Item 4 - Controls and Procedures	35
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	36
	Item 1A - Risk Factors	36
	Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	36
	Item 3 - Default upon Senior Securities	36
	Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	37
	Item 5 - Other Information	37
	Item 6 – Exhibits	37
	Signatures	37

- 3 -

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

 

ICEWEB, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(1)

Derived from audited financial statements

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 4 -

ICEWEB, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 5 -

ICEWEB, Inc.

Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 6 -

ICEWEB, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

			Nine months ended
			June 30,
			2013			2012
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		$	(3,376,493)		$	(4,375,749)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment in marketable securities			-			(33,000)
Purchase of property and equipment			-			(217,446)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES			-			(250,446)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from convertible note payable			-			1,750,000
Proceeds from subscription receivable			-			1,171,520
Proceeds from conversion of warrants			-			102,460
Payment of financing costs			-			(571,270)
Proceeds from notes payable – related party			111,000			-
Proceeds from the sale of restricted common stock			249,000			1,834,347
Proceeds from notes payable			502,486			301,896
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options			2,570,163			180,717
Proceeds from payments on convertible debenture			-			884,612
Payments on notes payable			(247,207)			(258,195)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES			3,185,442			5,396,087
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH			(191,051 )			769,892
CASH - beginning of period			269,594			4,120
CASH - end of period		$	78,543		$	774,012
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for :
Interest		$	177,961		$	214,686
Income taxes			—			—
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued for debt and interest		$	670,719		$	884,612

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 7 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS

 

Headquartered just outside of Washington, D.C., we manufacture high performance unified data storage appliances with enterprise storage management capabilities, and provide Cloud Computing Products/Services.  Through thin provisioning, target deduplication and inline compression managed through IceWEB’s proprietary IceSTORM™ Operating System, IceWEB’s unified storage appliances enable standardization, consolidation and optimized storage utilization for virtual and cloud environments, saving up to 90% of storage costs, while reducing space, power and cooling requirements and simplifying storage management.  Our customer base includes mid-sized businesses, large enterprises, and government organizations.

Major shifts in data center environments toward virtual and cloud based infrastructures have compounded the need for storage resources that can handle the complex and mixed systems that combine both file and block data.  Unified Data Storage from IceWEB reduces this complexity by providing a simplified environment to enable virtualization and cloud computing deployments, protection, and cost savings.  Unified Data Storage also provides cost savings through optimized storage utilization, made possible through IceWEB’s thin provisioning, storage pooling, compression and deduplication.

We generate revenue from the manufacture and sale of high-performance unified data storage appliances with IceWEB’s proprietary IceSTORM (STorage Optimization and Resource Management) Operating System and Cloud Computing Services.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Going Concern

We have had losses since inception that raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  For the year ended September 30, 2012 we incurred a net loss of $6,485,048 and for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 we incurred a net loss of $4,511,631, had a use of cash in operating activities of $3,376,493, and had negative working capital of $489,714.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recovery and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event we cannot continue in existence.

Management has established plans intended to increase the sales of our products and services. Management intends to seek new capital from new equity securities offerings to provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund growth, and implement its business plan. However, no assurances can be given that we will be able to raise any additional funds.

Investments in Marketable Securities

IceWEB accounts for marketable equity securities in accordance with ASC 320, “Investment – Debt and Equity Securities” with any unrealized gains and losses included as a net amount as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.  Certain securities that we may invest in may be determined to be non-marketable.  Non-marketable securities where we own less than 20% of the investee are accounted for at cost pursuant to ASC 323-10-35, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock”.

- 8 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, (continued)

Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of acquisition and reevaluates such determination at each balance sheet date.  Trading securities that we may hold are treated in accordance with ASC 320 with any unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.  Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity (deficit).  Investments classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost.  In determining realized gains and losses, the cost of the securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Under the guidance of ASC 320, “Investments”, we periodically evaluate other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of securities to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary.  Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other than temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent.  It indicates that the prospects for a near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding impairment charge to earnings is recognized.  In the assessment of OTTI for various securities at September 30, 2012 the guidance in ASC 320, “the Investment-Debt and Equity Securities,” is carefully followed.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheets and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in 2013 and 2012 include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of stock-based compensation, the allowance for inventory obsolescence, derivative liabilities, and the useful life and valuation of property and equipment and intangible assets, and litigation reserves.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of normal trade receivables. We recorded a bad debt allowance of $0 as of June 30, 2013 and $409,000 as of September 30, 2012, respectively. Management performs ongoing evaluations of its accounts receivable and has provided a general reserve for bad debt. Management believes that all remaining receivables are fully collectable. Bad debt expense amounted to $114,394 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 and $0 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012.

- 9 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, (continued)

Derivative Liability

Derivatives are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value (see NOTE 12).  These derivatives, including embedded derivatives in the Company’s structured borrowings and warrants, are separately valued and accounted for on the Company’s balance sheet with changes in fair value charged to operations.  Fair values for exchange traded securities and derivatives are based on quoted market prices.  Where market prices are not readily available, fair values are determined using market based pricing models incorporating readily observable market data and requiring judgment and estimates. In addition, additional disclosures are required about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  The established fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2:  Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities that are not active; and model-driven valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.  Valuations may be obtained from, or corroborated by, third-party pricing services.

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs to measure fair value of assets and liabilities for which there is little, if any market activity at the measurement date, using reasonable inputs and assumptions based upon the best information at the time, to the extent that inputs are available without undue cost and effort.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and notes payable are carried at cost, which approximates their fair value, due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments.

Our derivative financial instruments, consisting of embedded conversion features in our convertible debt, which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis under FASB ASC 815-15-25 or FASB ASC 815 as of June 30, 2013 are measured at fair value, using a Black-Scholes valuation model which approximates a binomial lattice valuation methodology utilizing Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities (see NOTE 9).

- 10 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, (continued)

Inventory

Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, on an average cost basis.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is recorded by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets, net consists of the cost of acquired customer relationships. We capitalize and amortize the cost of acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. The Company periodically reevaluates the carrying value of its intangible assets for events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As part of this reevaluation, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the intangible asset to the estimated fair value of the asset.

Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment” (formerly SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”), we review the carrying value of intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property, if any, exceeds its fair market value.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $19,767 and $93,975 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

We follow the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” (formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”) for revenue recognition. In general, we record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The following policies reflect specific criteria for our various revenues streams:

Revenues from sales of products are generally recognized when products are shipped unless the Company has obligations remaining under sales or licensing agreements, in which case revenue is either deferred until all obligations are satisfied or recognized ratably over the term of the contract.

- 11 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, (continued)

Earnings per Share

We compute earnings per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” (formerly SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”).  Under the provisions of ASC Topic 260, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of the common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method) and upon the conversion of convertible preferred stock (using the if-converted method). Potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the calculation if their effect is antidilutive. At June 30, 2013 and 2012, there were options and warrants to purchase 121,052,098 shares and 96,961,072  shares of common stock, as adjusted, and 626,667 shares issuable upon conversion of Series B preferred stock outstanding, respectively, which could potentially dilute future earnings per share.

Stock-Based Compensation

As more fully described in NOTE 15, we have two stock option plans that provide for non-qualified and incentive stock options to be issued to directors, officers, employees and consultants (the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”), and the 2013 Employee Option Plan (the “2013 Plan”).

We account for stock-based compensation to employees under ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation, “Share-Based Payments using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under that method, compensation cost is recognized.

Other Receivables

 

We have a purchase order arrangement with a key vendor that provides us the flexibility to make purchases of inventory components on credit with our customer remitting payment to the vendor.  This arrangement provides us with the cash needed to finance certain of our on-going costs and expenses, and provides that we collect on our receivables once the vendor has been paid.  This vendor had collected $1,780 on our behalf that had not been remitted to us as of June 30, 2013.

- 12 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

 

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)-Presentation of Comprehensive Income and Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)-Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. The adoption of these amended standards impacted the presentation of other comprehensive income, as the Company elected to present two separate but consecutive statements, but did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

Various accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 3 – OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

Other current assets totaled $120,380 at June 30, 2013, and is made up of costs incurred related to the pending acquisition of Computers & Tele-Comm, Inc. and KCNAP, LLC.  These costs will be capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition up completion of the transaction.

NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment, net, consists of the following: 

		Estimated Life		June 30, 2013			September 30, 2012
Office equipment		5 years		$	644,020		$	644,020
Computer software		3 years			29,523			29,523
Leasehold improvements		2 - 5 years			1,033,495			1,033,495
					1,707,038			1,707,038
Less: accumulated depreciation					(1,328,188	)		(1,207,253	)
				$	378,850		$	499,785

 

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $70,993 and $115,639 respectively.

NOTE 5 - INVENTORY

 

Inventory consisted of the following:

	June 30, 2013			September, 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	224,386		$	175,258
Work in progress		42,072			42,335
Finished goods		14,024			64,638
	$	280,482		$	282,231

- 13 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES

On November 23, 2011, IceWEB, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with three accredited investors pursuant to which the Company sold $2,012,500 in principal amount of Senior Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) and issued the investors Series O, Series P and Series Q Warrants (collectively, the “Warrants”) to purchase up to an aggregate of 81,587,8743 shares, as adjusted, of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,750,000 in a private transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) and Regulation D of the Securities Act.     The Company issued the Notes at an original issue discount of 13%.

		June 30,				September 30,
		2013				2012
Principal balance of convertible notes		$		-		$		164,469
Original issue discount, net				-				(5,398	)
Debt discount		-				(53,895			)
Convertible notes, net of discount		$		-		$		105,176

The convertible notes, which had a maturity date of August, 2013, were paid in full in February, 2013, and all related discounts were fully amortized as of that date.

On April 10, 2013 the Company entered into a promissory note agreement with JMJ Financial for an amount of up to $500,000.  The note bears interest at 12% which is prepaid at the time of funding, and was issued with a 10% original issue discount.  Each note has a seven month term and is repayable in cash or stock with a minimum conversion price per share of $0.075 per share or 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had borrowed $183,000 under this agreement.

		June 30,				September 30,
		2013				2012
Principal balance of promissory notes		$		183,000		$		-
Original issue discount, net				(10,738	)			-
Convertible notes, net of discount		$		172,262		$		-

- 14 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE

Sand Hill Finance, LLC

 

On December 19, 2005, the Company entered into a Financing Agreement with Sand Hill Finance, LLC pursuant to which, together with related amendments, the Company may borrow up to 80% on the Company’s accounts receivable balances up to a maximum of $1,800,000. In conjunction with the acquisition of Inline Corporation in December, 2008, the lending limit on the credit facility was increased to $2,750,000. In addition, the Company and Sand Hill Finance, LLC entered into a 36 month term note agreement in the amount of $1,000,000. Amounts borrowed under the Financing Agreement are secured by a first security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. At June 30, 2013, the principal amount due under the Financing Agreement amounted to $1,640,610.

 

Interest on the accounts receivable-based borrowings was payable at a rate of 1.75% per month on the average loan balance outstanding during the year, equal to an annual interest rate of approximately 21% per year. The Company also agreed to pay an upfront commitment fee of 1% of the credit line upon signing the Financing Agreement, half of which was due and paid upon signing (amounting to $9,000) and half of which is due on the first anniversary of the Financing Agreement. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a commitment fee of 1% of the credit limit annually, such amounts are payable on the anniversary of the agreement.

In connection with the term note, the Company issued Sand Hill Finance, LLC a seven-year common stock purchase warrant to purchase 120,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The exercise price was subsequently reduced to $0.50 per share pursuant to Warrant Amendment Agreement which was executed in conjunction with the convertible debenture. The warrant contains a cashless exercise provision which means that at the option of the holder, the warrant is convertible into a number of shares of our common stock as determined by dividing the aggregate fair market value of the Company’s common stock minus the aggregate exercise price of the warrant by the fair market value of one share of common stock.

The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrant and the exercise price are subject to adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits and reclassifications.  The fair value of the warrant of $13,589 has been recorded as an addition to paid-in capital and deferred finance costs during the year ended September 30, 2009.

 

The Financing Agreement had a term of one year, subject to mutual extension by both parties. As a result, the balance due to Sand Hill Finance, LLC is classified as a current liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

 

The terms of the Financing Agreement also restrict the Company from undertaking certain transactions without the written consent of the creditor including (i) permit or suffer a change in control involving 20% of its securities, (ii) acquire assets, except in the ordinary course of business, involving payment of $100,000 or more, (iii) sell, lease, or transfer any of its property except for sales of inventory and equipment in the ordinary course of business, (iv) transfer, sell or license any intellectual property, (v) declare or pay a dividend on stock, except payable in the form of stock dividends (vi) incur any indebtedness other than trade credit in the ordinary course of business and (vii) permit any lien or security interest to attach to any collateral.

In November, 2011, in connection with the Company’s private placement of convertible notes and Securities Purchase Agreement (see NOTE 6), Sand Hill Finance, LLC executed an amendment to the Financing Agreement in which Sand Hill Finance LLC agreed that they would not pursue any remedies of default under the Financing Agreement until at least the ninety-first day after the obligations under the convertible notes have been fully satisfied.

- 15 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 7 - NOTES PAYABLE, (continued)

On September 7, 2012, Sand Hill Finance, LLC and IceWEB, Inc. entered into an agreement to amend the Financing Agreement in which Sand Hill Finance, LLC agreed to lower the interest rate on Iceweb’s existing debt from 21% per annum to 12% per annum.

On April 12, 2013 the Company entered into an agreement with Sand Hill Finance, LLC to amend the existing Financing Agreement by issuing a convertible debenture to replace IceWEB’s existing note payable, in the amount of $2,139,235. The debenture is convertible into common stock at a fixed price of $0.075 per share, bears interest at 12% annually, and has a two year term. In addition, the terms of the note call for monthly payments of $15,000, which increases to $25,000 in the event that IceWEB raises $3,000,000 or more in an equity financing.  As of June 30, 2013 Sand Hill Finance, LLC has converted $506,250 of the debenture balance into 6,750,000  shares of IceWEB, Inc. $0.001 par value common stock.  The exchange of debt instruments did not qualify under ASC 470-50 “Modifications and Extinguishments” as a debt extinguishment.

NOTE 8 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

 

Bank Balances

 

The Company maintains cash in financial institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), including non-interest bearing transaction account deposits protected in full in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).  At June 30, 2013 all of the Company’s cash balances were fully insured.  The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

- 16 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 9 - INVESTMENTS

(a) Summary of Investments

Marketable Equity Securities:

As of June 30, 2013,  the Company’s investments in marketable equity securities are based on the June 30, 2013  stock price as reflected on the OTCBB stock exchange , reduced by a discount factor if those shares have selling restrictions.  These marketable equity securities are summarized as follows:

June 30, 2013		Cost			Gross Unrealized Gain			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Publicly traded equity securities		$	81,000		$	-		$	(77,310	)	$	3,690
Total		$	81,000		$	-		$	(77,310	)	$	3,690

September 30, 2012		Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Publicly traded equity securities		$	81,000		$	228,600		$	—		$	309,600
Total		$	81,000		$	228,600		$	—		$	309,600

The unrealized gains are presented in comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

(b) Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments

The following table summarizes the unrealized net gains (losses) associated with the Company’s investments:

		Nine months ended
		June 30
		2013				2012
Net unrealized gains/(loss) on investments in publicly traded equity securities		$	(305,910	)		$	15,800
Net unrealized gains/(loss) on investments		$	(305,910	)		$	15,800

- 17 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 9 – INVESTMENTS, (continued)

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820, which, among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The Company did not adopt the ASC 820 fair value framework for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would either be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

Investment Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

		Fair Value Measurements Using:
		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)				Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
June 30, 2013
Marketable Equity Securities		$	3,690			$	—			$	—

Liabilities: 

Derivative liabilities		$	—			$	—			$	116,875

September 30, 2012
Marketable Equity Securities, net of discount for effect of restriction		$	—			$	—			$	309,600

Liabilities: 

Derivative liabilities		$	—			$	—			$	1,104,499

- 18 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 9 - INVESTMENTS (continued)

We categorize the securities as investments in marketable securities available for sale.  These securities are quoted either on an exchange or inter-dealer quotation (pink sheet) system. The securities are restricted and cannot be readily resold by us absent a registration of those securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the availabilities of an exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act.  As these securities are often restricted, we are unable to liquidate them until the restriction is removed.  Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale are recognized as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security.  Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale are reflected in our net income for the period in which the security was liquidated.

Under the guidance of ASC 320, “Investments”, we periodically evaluate other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of securities to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary.  Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other than temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent.  It indicates that the prospects for a near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding impairment charge to earnings is recognized.  In the assessment of OTTI for various securities at September 30, 2010 the guidance in ASC 320, “the Investment-Debt and Equity Securities,” is carefully followed. 

 

There were no impairment charges on investments in publicly traded equity securities for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

The Company has evaluated its publicly traded equity securities as of June 30, 2013, and has determined that there were no unrealized losses that indicate an other-than-temporary impairment. This determination was based on several factors, which include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the publicly traded equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

NOTE 10 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive income or loss refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity.

Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized losses on marketable securities available for sale of $77,310 at June 30, 2013, and unrealized gains of $228,600 at September 30, 2012.

- 19 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 11 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Derivative warrant liability

The Company has warrants issued in connection with our convertible notes payable outstanding with price protection provisions that allow for the reduction in the exercise price of the warrants in the event the Company subsequently issues stock or securities convertible into stock at a price lower than the exercise price of the warrants.  Simultaneously with any reduction to the exercise price, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of each of these warrants shall be increased or decreased proportionately, so that after such adjustment the aggregate exercise price payable for the adjusted number of warrants shall be the same as the aggregate exercise price in effect immediately prior to such adjustment.  The Company accounted for its warrants with price protection in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815.

Accounting for Derivative Warrant Liability

The Company’s derivative warrant instruments have been measured at fair value at June 30, 2013 using the Black-Scholes model.  The Company recognizes all of its warrants with price protection in its consolidated balance sheet as liabilities.  The liability is revalued at each reporting period and changes in fair value are recognized currently in the consolidated statements of operations.  The initial recognition and subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative warrant liability have no effect on the Company’s cash flows.

The derivative warrants outstanding at June 30, 2013 are all currently exercisable with a weighted-average remaining life of 3.34 years.

The mark to market adjustments for the nine month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 resulted in the recognition of income of $987,624 and an expense of $2,773,086, respectively, within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, under the caption “Change in fair value of derivative warrant liability”.  The fair value of the warrants at June 30, 2013 is $116,875 which is reported on the consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Derivative Liability”.  The following summarizes the changes in the value of the derivative warrant liability from the date of the Company’s issuance of derivative warrant instruments on November 23, 2011 until June 30, 2013:

- 20 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 11 - DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES (continued)

Fair Value Assumptions Used in Accounting for Derivative Warrant Liability

The Company has determined its derivative warrant liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has used the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value as of June 30, 2013.  The Black-Scholes model requires six basic data inputs: the exercise or strike price, time to expiration, the risk free interest rate, the current stock price, the estimated volatility of the stock price in the future, and the dividend rate.  Because the warrants contain the price protection feature, the probability that the exercise price of the warrants would decrease as the stock price decreased was incorporated into the valuation calculations.  The key inputs used in the June 30, 2013 fair value calculations were as follows:

		June 30,
		2013
Current exercise price		$0.028
Time to expiration		3.34 years
Risk-free interest rate			1.04	%
Estimated volatility			274	%
Dividend			-0-
Stock price on June 30, 2013		$	0.0227

NOTE 12 - COMMITMENTS

We are on a month to month tenancy in our office space in Sterling, Virginia, as our two-year operating lease expired on June 30, 2012.  The office lease agreement had certain escalation clauses and renewal options.  We currently have no future minimum rental payments under operating leases.

NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Common Stock Warrants

 

The outstanding warrants at June 30, 2013 have a weighted average exercise price of $0.044 per share and have a weighted average remaining life of 3.20 years.

Certain of these warrants contain provisions which cause them to be classified as derivative liabilities pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 815-40, “Derivatives and hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (ASC 815-40). Accordingly, upon issuance the warrants were recorded as a derivative liability and valued at a fair market value of $1,750,000. The fair value of these warrants was decreased to $116,875 as of June 30, 2013. The non-cash income adjustment recorded in the Statement of Operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 was $987,624.  We are required to continue to adjust the warrants to fair value through current period operations for each reporting period.

- 21 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (continued)

The Company issued warrants for common shares with a current exercise price as of June 30, 2013, as adjusted, of $0.028 which have price protection provisions that allow for the reduction in the current exercise price upon the occurrence of certain events, including the Company’s issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, such as options and warrants, at a price per share less than the exercise price then in effect.  For instance, if the Company issues shares of its common stock or options exercisable for or securities convertible into common stock at an effective price per share of common stock less than the exercise price then in effect, the exercise price will be reduced to the effective price of the new issuance.  Simultaneously with any reduction to the exercise price, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of each of these warrants shall be increased proportionately, so that after such adjustment the aggregate exercise price payable for the adjusted number of warrants shall be the same as the aggregate exercise price in effect immediately prior to such adjustment.

On April 10, 2013 we entered into an agreement with the holders of the Series O warrants and Series Q warrants whereby in exchange for their agreement to waive any right to an adjustment in the exercise price or any additional shares of these warrants in accordance with the foregoing “full ratchet” provisions, and their agreement to sell no more than 10% of the daily volume of our common stock in the market on any given trading day, we reduced the exercise price of each of the Series O warrants and Series Q warrants to $0.028 per share.  The Company, in accounting for this in accordance with ASC 718, determined that the financial impact of this amendment to the warrants was deminimus.

As previously disclosed, in November 2011, IceWEB, Inc. entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold $2,012,500 in principal amount of senior convertible notes and issued the investors Series O, Series P and Series Q warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 35,514,789 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1,750,000 in a private transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933. We issued Rodman & Renshaw, LLC, a broker-dealer and member of FINRA who acted as the exclusive placement agent for us in this offering, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 911,765 shares of our common stock which are identical to the Series O warrants as partial compensation for their services to us. Rodman & Renshaw, LLC subsequently transferred those warrants to third parties.

 

The terms of these warrants provided that the exercise price of the warrants was initially $0.17 per share, subject to adjustment as described below. The Series O warrants and Series P warrants were each immediately exercisable. The Series Q warrants became exercisable at any time that any portion of the Series P warrants held by that warrantholder were exercised. The term of the Series O warrants is five years from the issue date, the term of the Series P warrants is one year from the Applicable Date, as hereinafter defined, and the term of the Series Q warrants was for five years from the Applicable Date, subject to the aforedescribed requirement. The warrants are not exercisable if, after giving effect to the exercise, the holder or any of its affiliates would be the beneficial owner as determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC of in excess of 4.9% of our outstanding shares of common stock. In addition to customary anti-dilution provisions, the warrant exercise price is also subject to a “full ratchet” anti-dilution adjustment which, in the event that we issue or are deemed to have issued, certain securities at a price lower than the then applicable warrant exercise price, immediately reduces warrant exercise price to equal the price at which we issued or were deemed to have issued, our common stock. As a result of subsequent transactions by us, the exercise price of each series of these warrants was subsequently reduced to $0.028 per share and the number of shares underlying these warrants were increased.

The registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock underlying each series of these warrants was declared effective by the SEC on February 8, 2012 (the “Applicable Date”).  As of August 14, 2013 there are a total of 29,290,605 Series O warrants and 3,108,115 Series Q warrants outstanding, net of exercises and expirations.

- 22 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (continued)

The Company’s issuance of the following securities will not trigger the price protection provisions of the warrants described above that were issued in connection with the November 2011 private placement:  (a) shares of common stock or standard options to the Company’s directors, officers, employees or consultants pursuant to a board-approved equity compensation program or other contract or arrangement; (b) shares of common stock issued upon the conversion or exercise of any security, right or other instrument convertible or exchangeable into common stock (or securities exchangeable into common stock) issued prior to November 23, 2011; and (c) shares of common stock and warrants in connection with strategic alliances, acquisitions, mergers, and strategic partnerships, the primary purpose of which is not to raise capital, and which are approved in good faith by the Company’s board of directors.

In October, 2012 we issued 10,433,853 warrants with a one year life and a conversion price of $0.08 per share. These warrants are unregistered, do not have price protection, and were issued to a consultant for services rendered to the Company.  The Company recognized $42,724 of expense associated with the issuance of this warrant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding common stock warrants as of June 30, 2013 and changes during the period ending on that date is as follows:

- 23 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 13 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (continued)

The following table summarizes information about common stock warrants outstanding at June 30, 2013:

 

		Warrants Outstanding							Warrants Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price		Number Outstanding at June 30, 2013		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price			Number Exercisable at June 30, 2013		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$   0.028		89,928,721		3.34 Years		$   0.028			89,928,721		$   0.028
$     0.08		10,433,853		0.25 Years		$     0.08			10,433,853		$     0.08
$     0.15		14,801,554		3.25 Years		$     0.15			14,801,554		$     0.15
$     0.50		120,000		1.67 Years		$     0.50			120,000		$     0.50
		115,284,128				$     0.0489			115,284,128		$      0.0489

NOTE 14 - STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

In August 2012, the Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for directors, officers and employees that provides for non-qualified and incentive stock options to be issued enabling holders thereof to purchase common shares of the Company at exercise prices determined by the Company’s Board of Directors.

 

The purpose of the Plan is to advance the Company’s interests and those of its stockholders by providing a means of attracting and retaining key employees, directors and consultants. In order to serve this purpose, the Company believes the Plan encourages and enables key employees, directors and consultants to participate in its future prosperity and growth by providing them with incentives and compensation based on its performance, development and financial success. Participants in the Plan may include the Company’s officers, directors, other key employees and consultants who have responsibilities affecting our management, development or financial success.

 

Awards may be made under the Plan in the form of Plan options, shares of the Company’s common stock subject to a vesting schedule based upon certain performance objectives (“Performance Shares”) and shares subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient’s continued employment (“restricted shares”). Plan options may either be options qualifying as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended or options that do not so qualify. Any incentive stock option granted under the Plan must provide for an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of such grant, but the exercise price of any incentive option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of our common stock must be at least 110% of such fair market value as determined on the date of the grant. Only persons who are officers or other key employees are eligible to receive incentive stock options and performance share grants. Any non-qualified stock option granted under the Plan must provide for an exercise price of not less than 50% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of such grant.

 

- 24 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 14 - STOCK OPTION PLAN (continued)

The term of each Plan option and the manner in which it may be exercised is determined by the Board of Directors, provided that no Plan option may be exercisable more than three years after the date of its grant and, in the case of an incentive option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of the Company’s common stock, no more than five years after the date of the grant. The exercise price of the stock options may be paid in either cash, or delivery of unrestricted shares of common stock having a fair market value on the date of delivery equal to the exercise price, or surrender of shares of common stock subject to the stock option which has a fair market value equal to the total exercise price at the time of exercise, or a combination of the foregoing methods.

 

On June 11, 2013 the Board of Directors adopted the 2013 Employee Option Plan covering 25,000,000 shares of our common stock to permit us to offer to our employees and consultants whose past, present and/or potential contributions to our company have been, are or will be important to our success, an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in our company.  The issuance of grants under the plan will be made to persons who are closely related to us and who provide bona fide services to us in connection with our business which are not in connection with the offer or sale of our securities in a capital raising transaction and do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for our securities.  Grants of options or shares may be awarded under the plan pursuant to individually negotiated compensation contracts or as determined and/or approved by our Board of Directors.  The eligible participants include our employees and non-employee consultants and advisors.  There is no limit as to the number of securities that may be awarded under the 2013 Employee Option Plan to a single participant.

 

The 2013 Employee Option Plan does not require restrictions on the transferability of securities issued thereunder.  However, such securities may be restricted as a condition to their issuance where the Board of Directors deems such restrictions appropriate.  The 2013 Employee Option Plan is not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act of 1974.  Restricted shares awarded under the 2013 Employee Option Plan are intended to be fully taxable to the recipient as earned income.

The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model. The Company used the following assumptions for determining the fair value of options granted under the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

		June 30,
			2013			2012
Expected volatility			36%-278%			323% - 325%
Expected term			1-5 Years			1 - 5 Years
Risk-free interest rate			0.06% - 0.072%			0.03%
Forfeiture Rate			0% - 45%			0% - 45%
Expected dividend yield			0%			0%

The expected volatility was determined with reference to the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of grant.

 

- 25 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

NOTE 14 - STOCK OPTION PLAN (continued)

For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted 69,143,785 options to employees and consultants, which resulted in stock-based compensation charged to operations for option-based arrangements of $566,682, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. At June 30, 2013, there was approximately $190,896 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the Plan.

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2013 and changes during the period ending on that date is as follows:  

- 26 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

 

NOTE 15 - SEGMENT REPORTING

Although the Company has a number of operating divisions, separate segment data has not been presented as they meet the criteria for aggregation as permitted by ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”).

Our chief operating decision-maker is considered to be our Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The CEO reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The financial information reviewed by the CEO is identical to the information presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Therefore, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating segment, specifically, web communications services. For the periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 all material assets and revenues of the Company were in the United States.

NOTE 16 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On November 2, 2012 IceWEB, Inc. entered into a Loan Agreement with IWEB Growth Fund, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“IWEB Growth Fund”) which was recently established by Messrs. Compton, Bush, Carosi, Pirtle and Stavish and General Soyster, our independent directors. Ms. My Le Phuong, an employee of our company, serves as manager of the IWEB Growth Fund. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, IWEB Growth Fund agreed to make one or more loans to us up to the total principal amount of $1.5 million. The lending of any amounts under the Loan Agreement is conditioned upon the negotiation of notes and related loan documents which contain terms and conditions that are acceptable to the lender to be determined at the time of the loans. We agreed to grant IWEB Growth Fund a security interest in our assets as collateral for these loans, which such security interest is subordinate to the interest of our primary lender Sand Hill Finance, LLC. In the event we should default under the terms of the Loan Agreement, IWEB Growth Fund is entitled to declare all amounts advanced under the various notes immediately due and payable. An event of default includes a breach by us of any covenant, representation or warranty in the Loan Agreement or a default under any note entered into with the lender.

 

Between November 9, 2012 and November 13, 2012, IWEB Growth Fund lent us an aggregate of $111,000.00 under the terms of 6 separate Confession of Judgment Promissory Notes. These notes, which are identical in their terms other than the dates and principal amounts, are for a one year term and bear interest at 12% per annum payable at maturity. Embodied in each of the notes is a confession of judgment which means that should we default upon the payment of the note, we have agreed to permit IWEB Growth Fund to enter a judgment against us in the appropriate court in Virginia before filing suit against us for collection of the amounts. Pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement, we paid IWEB Growth Fund’s expenses of $1,500 for the preparation of the Loan Agreement and related documents. We are using the net proceeds from these initial loans for general working capital.

On June 24, 2013 Nick Carosi, a member of our Board of Directors, advanced $50,000 to us for operating expenses. This advance was short-term in nature, is non-interest bearing, and has been repaid in full.

- 27 -

ITEM 2.       MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

 

The following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including footnotes, appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report.

 

OVERVIEW

 

Headquartered just outside of Washington, D.C., we manufacture high performance unified data storage appliances with enterprise storage management capabilities.  Through thin provisioning, target deduplication and inline compression managed through IceWEB’s proprietary IceSTORM™ Operating System, IceWEB’s unified storage appliances enable standardization, consolidation and optimized storage utilization for virtual and cloud environments, saving up to 90% of storage costs, while reducing space, power and cooling requirements and simplifying storage management.  Our customer base includes mid-sized businesses, large enterprises, and government organizations.

Major shifts in data center environments toward virtual and cloud based infrastructures have compounded the need for storage resources that can handle the complex and mixed systems that combine both file and block data.  Unified Data Storage from IceWEB reduces this complexity by providing a simplified environment to enable virtualization and cloud computing deployments, protection, and cost savings.  Unified Data Storage also provides cost savings through optimized storage utilization, made possible through IceWEB’s thin provisioning, storage pooling, compression and deduplication.

We generate revenue from the manufacture and sale of high-performance unified data storage appliances with IceWEB’s proprietary IceSTORM (STorage Optimization and Resource Management) Operating System.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements included for the year ended September 30, 2012 and notes thereto contained on Form 10-K of the Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide useful and reliable financial information about the company’s operating results and financial condition.

 

Financial Reporting Release No. 60, which was released by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, encourages all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements include a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.

 

- 28 -

Use of Estimates - Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations is based upon our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates, including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, the carrying value of property and equipment and long-lived assets, and the value of stock-option based compensation. Management bases these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Accounting for Stock Based Compensation - Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.   ASC Topic 718 establishes the financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based compensation plans. As required by ASC Topic 718, we recognize the cost resulting from all stock-based payment transactions including shares issued under our stock option plans in the financial statements. The adoption of ASC Topic 718 will have a negative impact on our future results of operations.

 

Revenue Recognition - We follow the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” for revenue recognition. In general, we record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The following policies reflect specific criteria for our various revenues streams:

	•	Revenues from sales of products are generally recognized when products are shipped unless the Company has obligations remaining under sales or licensing agreements, in which case revenue is either deferred until all obligations are satisfied or recognized ratably over the term of the contract.
	•	Revenue from services is recorded as it is earned. Commissions earned on third party sales are recorded in the month in which contracts are awarded. Customers are generally billed every two weeks based on the units of production for the project. Each project has an estimated total which is based on the estimated units of production and agreed upon billing rates.
	•	Amounts billed in advance of services being provided are recorded as deferred revenues and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations as services are provided.

 

- 29 -

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 COMPARED TO THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012

 

The following table provides an overview of certain key factors of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012:

Other Key Indicators:

Nine Month Period ended June 30, 2013

 

Revenues

 

For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, we reported revenues of $873,446 as compared to revenues of $2,546,852 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $1,673,406 or approximately 66%. The decrease is primarily due to the slow-down from our government customers, limited resources available for sales and marketing efforts, and the residual effect in our sales efforts from the untimely passing of our former CEO, John Signorello.

- 30 -

Cost of Sales

 

Our cost of sales consists primarily of component parts for the manufacture of our storage products. For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, cost of sales was $491,480, or approximately 56.3% of revenues, compared to $1,669,704, or approximately 65.6% of revenues, for the nine months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in costs of sales as a percentage of revenue and the corresponding increase in our gross profit margin for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2012 was the result of lower component costs, primarily the price of hard drives, which were higher in the prior year period due to the disruption in the world supply from the flooding in Thailand. We anticipate that our gross profit margins will remain in the range of 40% to 45% through the balance of fiscal 2013.

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

Our total operating expenses increased approximately 94% to $5,489,791 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $2,830,954 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012. These changes include:

 

•          Sales and marketing expense . Sales and marketing expense includes salaries, commission, occupancy, telephone, travel, and entertainment expenses for direct sales personnel.  For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, sales and marketing costs were $733,713 as compared to $641,255 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $92,458 or approximately 14%.  The increase is primarily due higher costs for sales and marketing efforts.

 

•          Depreciation and amortization expense . For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $120,936 as compared to $149,435 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $28,499 or 19%.  

•          Research and development . For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, research and development costs were $656,491 as compared to $708,324 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $51,833 or approximately 7%.  Research and development expense is lower due to lower headcount and consulting costs in the second and third fiscal quarters ending June 30, 2013.

 

•          General and administrative expense . For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expenses were $3,978,651 as compared to $1,331,939 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $2,646,837 or approximately 199%. For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 general and administrative expenses consisted of the following:

 

		Fiscal Q3				Fiscal Q3
		2013				2012
Occupancy		$	26,642			$	28,747
Consulting			1,151,476				7,480
Employee compensation			1,562,869				570,691
Professional fees			178,275				133,531
Internet/Phone			6,687				4,988
Travel/Entertainment			30,418				27,492
Investor Relations			794,808				430,271
Insurance			15,381				11,771
Other			212,095				116,968
		$	3,978,651			$	1,331,939

 

- 31 -

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, Occupancy expense decreased to $26,642 as compared to $28,747, primarily due to a decreased allocation of rent expense to administration.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, Consulting expense increased to $1,151,476 as compared to $7,480. Consulting expense increased primarily as a result of non-cash based costs incurred related to mergers and acquisition activity.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, Salaries and related expenses increased to $1,562,869 as compared to $570,691, an increase of $992,178. The increase is due primarily to higher non-cash compensation expense of $1,152,563 as compared to $6,846, offset by lower cash-based compensation expense.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, Professional fees expense increased to $178,275 as compared to $133,531.  Professional fees expense increased due to increased costs related to business development and other legal fees.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, internet and telephone expense increased to $6,687 as compared to $4,988.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, travel and entertainment expense increased to $30,418 as compared to $27,492.  The increase was primarily due to increased travel related to investor relations and analyst meetings.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 Other expense amounted to $212,095 as compared to $116,968 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $95,128.  The increase was due to bad debt expense recorded in the nine months ended June 30, 2013 of $114,394.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 Investor relations expense increased to $794,808 as compared to $430,271 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012. The increase is due to increased investor relations activity.
	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, insurance expense decreased to $15,381 as compared to $11,771.  The increase was primarily due to increase in premiums for insurance.

We anticipate that general and administrative expenses will be at a lower rate for the balance of fiscal 2013 due to lower consulting, non-cash based compensation expense, and investor relations expense.

 

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

We reported a loss from operations of $5,107,825 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to a loss from operations of $1,953,806 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, an increased loss of $3,154,019 or approximately 161%.

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)

 

Interest Expense .  For the nine months ended June 30, 2013, interest expense amounted to $391,430 as compared to $1,796,060 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $1,404,629 or 78%. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to the reduced amortization of the discount on our convertible debentures, which were retired in February, 2013.

Gain (loss) on change of fair value of derivative liability.  For the nine months ended June 30, 2013 we incurred a decrease in the value of the derivative liability of $987,624 as compared to an increase in the value of the derivative liability of $2,773,086 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

- 32 -

NET INCOME/ LOSS

 

Our net loss was $4,511,631 for the nine months ended June 30, 2013 compared to a net loss of $6,522,930 for the nine months ended June 30, 2012.

Three Month Period ended June 30, 2013

 

Revenues

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we reported revenues of $104,891 as compared to revenues of $654,996 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $550,105 or approximately 84%.

 

Cost of Sales

 

Our cost of sales consists of component parts for the manufacture of our storage products. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, cost of sales was $63,267, or approximately 60.3% of revenues, compared to $444,016, or approximately 67.8% of revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in costs of sales as a percentage of revenue and the corresponding increase in our gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012 was the result of lower component costs, primarily the price of hard drives, which were higher in the prior year period due to the disruption in the world supply from the flooding in Thailand. We anticipate that our gross profit margins will remain in the range of 40% to 45% through the balance of fiscal 2013.

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

Our total operating expenses increased approximately 51% to $1,618,581 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to $1,070,532 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. These changes include:

•            Sales and marketing expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2013, sales and marketing expenses were $117,404 as compared to $308,698 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $191,294 or approximately 62%. The decrease is primarily due lower sales headcount and lower costs for sales and marketing efforts.

 

•            Depreciation and amortization expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2013, depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $49,943 as compared to $33,797 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $16,146 or 48%.

•          Research and development . For the three months ended June 30, 2013, research and development costs were $176,456 as compared to $289,242 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $112,786 or approximately 39%, and is due to lower headcount and lower consulting costs incurred for research and development.

•            General and administrative expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2013, general and administrative expenses were $1,274,778 as compared to $438,796 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $835,984 or approximately 191%. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 general and administrative expenses consisted of the following:

- 33 -

		Fiscal Q3				Fiscal Q3
		2013				2012
Occupancy		$	8,127			$	9,292
Consulting			88,328				3,015
Employee compensation			944,132				168,857
Professional fees			65,166				28,017
Internet/Phone			2,493				1,578
Travel/Entertainment			12,454				10,333
Investor Relations			1,712				169,040
Insurance			6,108				6,053
Other			146,258				42,611
		$	1,274,778			$	438,796

 

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, Occupancy expense decreased to $8,127 as compared to $9,292.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, Consulting expense increased to $88,328 as compared to $3,015, an increase of $85,313.  Consulting expense increased primarily as a result of increased consulting related to merger and acquisition activity.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, Salaries and related expenses increased to $944,132 as compared to $168,857, an increase of $775,275, or 459%.  The increase is due primarily to increased non-cash stock and option based compensation expense of $784,152.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, Professional fees expense increased to $65,166 as compared to $28,017.  Professional fees expense increased primarily as a result of an increase in legal fees incurred related to business development activities.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, Internet/Phone expense increased to $2,493 as compared to $1,578.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, travel and entertainment expense increased to $12,454 as compared to $10,333. Travel and entertainment expense increased due to increased travel for investor relations and general corporate travel activity.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013, Insurance expense increased to $6,108 as compared to $6,053, as a result of higher premiums charged.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013 Other expense amounted to $146,258 as compared to $42,611 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The increase is due to bad debt expense of $114,394 for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2013 Investor relations expense decreased to 1,712 as compared to $169,040 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  The decrease is due to decreased investor relations activity.

 

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

We reported a loss from operations of $1,576,957 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to a loss from operations of $859,551 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of $717,405, or 83%.

- 34 -

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)

 

Interest Expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2013, interest expense amounted to $72,772 as compared to $984,317 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $909,201 or 92%. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to amortization of the discount on the outstanding convertible debentures in the prior year which did not occur in the current year period.

Gain (loss) on change of fair value of derivative liability. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 we incurred a decrease in the value of the derivative liability of $53,500, as compared to an increase in the value of the derivative liability of $2,156,007 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

NET INCOME/ LOSS

 

Our net loss was $1,596,229 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to a net loss of $3,999,875 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. The following table provides an overview of certain selected balance sheet comparisons between June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012: