UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
(Mark One)
☒ |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2014
OR
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-34747
SPANSION INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
20-3898239 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
915 DeGuigne Drive Sunnyvale, California |
|
94085 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(408) 962-2500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒ No ☐
As of May 1, 2014, the registrant had 60,371,219 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding at $0.001 par value per share.
Explanatory Note
This Amendment No. 1 to the Spansion Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2014, which was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2014 (the “Original Filing”), is being filed to correct an inadvertent clerical error in Exhibit 32.1. No other change to the previously filed certifications is intended to be made by the filing of this Form 10-Q/A, and this Form 10-Q/A does not amend, update or change any other items or disclosures contained in the Original Filing. This Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-Q continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing and does not reflect any events that occurred at any subsequent date.
Table of Contents
INDEX
|
|
|
Page No. |
Part I. |
Financial Information |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three Months Ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Three Months Ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and December 29, 2013 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three Months Ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 (Unaudited) |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
26 |
|
|
| |
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
34 |
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
36 |
|
|
|
|
Part II. |
Other Information |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
37 |
|
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
39 |
|
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
40 |
|
Signature |
41 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
Net sales |
$ | 311,750 | $ | 189,572 | ||||
Cost of sales |
221,918 | 143,717 | ||||||
Gross profit |
89,832 | 45,855 | ||||||
Research and development |
43,562 | 22,777 | ||||||
Sales, general and administrative |
55,631 | 28,483 | ||||||
Operating loss |
(9,361 | ) | (5,405 | ) | ||||
Interest and other income (expense), net |
(4,600 | ) | 962 | |||||
Interest expense |
(6,087 | ) | (7,604 | ) | ||||
Loss before income taxes |
(20,048 | ) | (12,047 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
(2,447 | ) | (2,388 | ) | ||||
Net loss |
$ | (22,495 | ) | $ | (14,435 | ) | ||
Net loss per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.38 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||
Diluted |
$ | (0.38 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||
Shares used in per share calculation: |
||||||||
Basic |
59,771 | 58,086 | ||||||
Diluted |
59,771 | 58,086 |
See accompanying notes.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
Net loss |
$ | (22,495 | ) | $ | (14,435 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||
Net foreign currency translation adjustment |
296 | (1,055 | ) | |||||
Unrealized gain on recovery from impaired investments reclassified into earnings |
- | (1,200 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges: |
||||||||
Net unrealized hedge gain (loss) arising during the period |
(4,714 | ) | 7,743 | |||||
Net loss (gain) reclassified into earnings for cash flow hedges |
1,382 | (1,753 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
(3,332 | ) | 5,990 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
(3,036 | ) | 3,735 | |||||
Total comprehensive loss |
$ | (25,531 | ) | $ | (10,700 | ) |
See accompanying notes.
Spansion, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except par value and share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Assets |
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 262,473 | $ | 286,069 | ||||
Short-term investments | 26,922 | 25,428 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 176,714 | 177,838 | ||||||
Inventories | 256,891 | 254,154 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 4,638 | 4,592 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 49,347 | 52,756 | ||||||
Total current assets | 776,985 | 800,837 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
184,648 | 185,505 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
158,950 | 167,949 | ||||||
Goodwill |
166,473 | 166,422 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
50,980 | 60,208 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,338,036 | $ | 1,380,921 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 128,524 | $ | 126,680 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits | 62,735 | 57,876 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other | 146,059 | 86,352 | ||||||
Income taxes payable | 3,846 | 4,651 | ||||||
Deferred income | 27,035 | 30,247 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 2,394 | 97,320 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 370,593 | 403,126 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,704 | 3,675 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
406,013 | 404,612 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
31,976 | 32,048 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 812,286 | 843,461 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) |
- | - | ||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Capital stock: | ||||||||
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 60,358,585 shares issued and outstanding as of March 30, 2014 (58,882,949 shares as of December 29, 2013) | 61 | 59 | ||||||
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value, 1 share authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding as of March 30, 2014 and 1 share issued and outstanding as of December 29, 2013 | - | - | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 761,212 | 747,393 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (228,454 | ) | (205,959 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 4) | (7,069 | ) | (4,033 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 525,750 | 537,460 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$ | 1,338,036 | $ | 1,380,921 |
See accompanying notes.
Spansion, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (22,495 | ) | $ | (14,435 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
26,306 | 20,379 | ||||||
Gain on recovery from impaired investments |
(449 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
Benefit from deferred income taxes |
(47 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sale and disposal of property, plant and equipment |
(34 | ) | (592 | ) | ||||
Loss on repurchase of 7.875% Senior Notes |
1,137 | - | ||||||
Compensation recognized under employee stock plans |
8,481 | 8,624 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
6,480 | (5,237 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
19,379 | 7,514 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from recovery of impaired investments |
449 | 1,530 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
96 | 612 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities |
8,382 | 28,346 | ||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(10,316 | ) | (12,883 | ) | ||||
Purchases of marketable securities |
(9,876 | ) | (24,024 | ) | ||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(11,265 | ) | (6,419 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock due to options exercised |
5,341 | 620 | ||||||
Refinancing cost on Term Loan and Revolver |
- | (114 | ) | |||||
Payments on financing arrangements |
- | (2,064 | ) | |||||
Repurchase of 7.875% Senior Notes including costs |
(96,319 | ) | - | |||||
Cash settlement of hedging activities |
- | (268 | ) | |||||
Net proceeds from sale of Sunnyvale property |
58,908 | - | ||||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
(32,070 | ) | (1,826 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
360 | 286 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(23,596 | ) | (445 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
286,069 | 262,177 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 262,473 | $ | 261,732 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Liabilities recorded for purchases of property, plant and equipment |
$ | 11,788 | $ | 7,168 |
See accompanying notes.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
1. |
Basis of Presentation |
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The December 29, 2013 condensed consolidated balance sheet data were derived from audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual periods.
These condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and related notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2013 as filed with the SEC on February 25, 2014. The results of operations for the three months ended March 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year.
The Company operates on a 52- to 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December. The additional week in a 53-week fiscal year is added to the second quarter to realign the Company’s fiscal quarters more closely to calendar quarters. Fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 are comprised of 52-weeks periods.
Principles of Consolidation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Company and all of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of commitments and contingencies and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates are used to account for the fair value of certain marketable securities, revenue adjustments, the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory write-downs, valuation of intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, legal contingencies, income taxes, stock-based compensation expenses, the fair value of long-term debt, and product warranties. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
2. |
Acquisition |
On August 1, 2013, the Company acquired the microcontroller and analog business (the MCA business) of Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited (FSL) for a purchase consideration of $158.5 million, ($150.0 million, net of cash acquired). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA) with FSL, the Company acquired certain subsidiaries and assets and assumed certain liabilities of FSL for purposes of acquiring FSL’s business of designing, developing, marketing and selling, microcontroller and analog semiconductor products.
There were no changes in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 to the provisional allocation of purchase price to the net assets acquired under the MCA business. The Company has not finalized the purchase price allocation for this acquisition as of March 30, 2014. As additional information becomes available such as finalization of working capital adjustment and tax related matters, the Company may revise the purchase price allocation.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
3. |
Balance Sheet Components |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 260,060 | $ | 282,163 | ||||
Cash equivalents: | ||||||||
Money market funds | 1,588 | 3,906 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit | 825 | - | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 262,473 | $ | 286,069 | ||||
Short-term investments |
||||||||
Time deposits | $ | 14,054 | $ | 14,045 | ||||
Certificates of deposit | 12,868 | 11,383 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 26,922 | $ | 25,428 | ||||
Account receivable, net |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, gross |
$ | 177,123 | $ | 178,252 | ||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(409 | ) | (414 | ) | ||||
Account receivable, net |
$ | 176,714 | $ | 177,838 | ||||
Inventories |
||||||||
Raw materials | $ | 8,992 | $ | 11,056 | ||||
Work-in-process | 191,920 | 176,601 | ||||||
Finished goods | 55,979 | 66,497 | ||||||
Inventories |
$ | 256,891 | $ | 254,154 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
||||||||
Land | $ | 45,168 | $ | 45,168 | ||||
Buildings and leasehold improvements | 62,966 | 61,923 | ||||||
Equipment | 398,416 | 385,679 | ||||||
Construction in progress | 18,131 | 19,734 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (340,033 | ) | (326,999 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 184,648 | $ | 185,505 | ||||
Other long term assets |
||||||||
Long term license | $ | 24,954 | $ | 30,273 | ||||
Others | 26,026 | 29,935 | ||||||
Other long term assets |
$ | 50,980 | $ | 60,208 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
||||||||
Accrued vacation | $ | 11,486 | $ | 11,077 | ||||
MCA business employees related pension obligation | 25,046 | 22,406 | ||||||
Others | 26,203 | 24,393 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
$ | 62,735 | $ | 57,876 | ||||
Accrued liabilities and other |
||||||||
Short term license liability | $ | 11,435 | $ | 13,003 | ||||
Obligation recorded from sale of Sunnyvale property | 58,908 | - | ||||||
Litigation reserve | 17,888 | 20,419 | ||||||
Others | 57,828 | 52,930 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other |
$ | 146,059 | $ | 86,352 |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
The Company’s cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the world, with the majority in the United States. As of March 30, 2014, the Company had cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments of $272.4 million held within the United States and $17.0 million held outside of the United States. As of December 29, 2013, the Company had cash, cash equivalents, and short term investments of $298.3 million held within the United States and $13.2 million held outside of the United States.
All securities other than the certificates of deposit were designated as available-for-sale. Certificates of deposit are held to maturity. Gross unrealized gains and losses on cash equivalents and short term investments were not material as of March 30, 2014 and December 29, 2013. Gross realized gains and losses on cash equivalents and short term investments were not material for the three months ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013.
Sale of Sunnyvale property
On January 23, 2014, the Company sold property in Sunnyvale, California, consisting of 24.5 acres of land with approximately 471,000 square feet of buildings that include its headquarters building and submicron development center, a Pacific Gas & Electric transmission facility and a warehouse building, for net consideration of $58.9 million. The Company concurrently leased back approximately 170,000 square feet of the headquarters building on a month to month basis with the Company having the option to continue the lease for up to 24 months; thereafter either party can terminate the lease. The first six months of the lease-back are rent free. For accounting purpose, the rents relating to the rent-free period have been netted off against the sale proceeds and represent prepaid rent. The Company’s rent-free use of this building constitutes continuing involvement by the Company-lessee, and recognition of the sale of the property and the related gain is deferred until such time the leaseback is at a market rate.
Due to the Company’s continuing involvement under the lease, the cash proceeds net of costs were recorded under the financing method as a short term financing obligation, in accordance with the authoritative guidance on leases and sale of real estate. Interest will be imputed on the financing obligation until such time that the sale can be recognized. The property continues to remain on the Company’s books and the buildings will be depreciated over their remaining useful life. As of March 30, 2014, $58.9 million was recorded in Accrued liabilities and other as a financing obligation. After the rent-free period, a portion of the lease payments will be recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion will be recognized as interest expense.
4. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
The following table summarizes the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
Net Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges
|
Total
|
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Beginning Balance, December 29, 2013 |
$ | (4,035 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (4,033 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income before reclassification, net of tax |
296 | (4,714 | ) | (4,418 | ) | |||||||
Amounts reclassified to earnings |
- | 1,382 | (1) | 1,382 | ||||||||
Net other comprehensive income |
$ | 296 | $ | (3,332 | ) | $ | (3,036 | ) | ||||
Ending Balance, March 30, 2014 |
$ | (3,739 | ) | $ | (3,330 | ) | $ | (7,069 | ) |
(1) Reclassified into Net Sales line item of the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Please see Note 10 for further details.
5. |
Equity Incentive Plan and Stock-Based Compensation |
Equity Incentive Plan
The Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Award Plan (2010 Plan) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock, performance awards, and deferred stock to its employees, consultants and non-employee members of its Board of Directors.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2014, the Company granted performance awards to certain senior executives where vesting is subject to achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. Performance is measured based on a combination of the Company achieving certain financial targets and a relative total shareholder return (TSR) goal. The TSR goal is based on the Company’s TSR measured against a benchmark TSR of a peer group over a three-year period. These awards vest at the end of the performance period of 3 years from the grant date. The number of stock awards to vest will range from 0% to 150% of the original awards granted. In evaluating the fair value of these awards, the Company used a combination of the stock price at the close of market on grant date, for the performance condition, and a Monte Carlo simulation on grant date, taking the market-based goal into consideration, for the market condition.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
The numbers of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2010 Plan are shown in the following table:
Shares Available For Grant |
||||
Balance as of December 29, 2013 |
2,350,404 | |||
Additional shares issuable under 2010 Plan (annual increase for 2014) |
2,069,902 | |||
Stock options forfeited/cancelled through March 30, 2014 |
177,791 | |||
RSU awards granted, net of forfeitures/cancellations |
(843,040 | ) | ||
Key executive RSU awards forfeited/cancelled through March 30, 2014 |
357,870 | |||
PSU awards granted, net of forfeitures/cancellations (1) |
(256,000 | ) | ||
Balance as of March 30, 2014 |
3,856,927 |
(1) Includes performance awards granted in fiscal 2014 at target. Maximum awards that could be earned is 411,000.
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table presents the total stock-based compensation expense by financial statement caption resulting from the Company’s stock options, RSU and PSU awards:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | 1,491 | $ | 1,472 | ||||
Research and development |
1,964 | 2,795 | ||||||
Sales, general and administrative |
5,026 | 4,357 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense after income taxes(1) |
$ | 8,481 | $ | 8,624 |
(1) There was no income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation because all of the Company's U.S. deferred tax assets, net of U.S. deferred tax liabilities, continue to be subject to a full valuation allowance. |
The weighted average fair value of the Company’s stock options granted is as follows:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted |
$ | - | $ | 4.99 |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
The fair value of each stock option was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following assumptions for grants:
Three Months Ended |
||||
March 31, 2013 |
||||
Expected volatility |
54.03% | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.60% | |||
Expected term (in years) |
4.35 | |||
Dividend yield |
0.00% |
As of March 30, 2014, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and RSU awards including performance based awards was approximately $31.5 million after reduction for estimated forfeitures which will be recognized by the end of first quarter of fiscal 2017. No stock options were granted in fiscal 2014.
The fair value of each PSU award granted in fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013 was $2.25 and $7.40 respectively using the Monte-Carlo pricing model and was estimated with the following assumptions:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
Stock price on grant date |
$ | 16.58 | $ | 11.50 | ||||
Expected volatility |
42.79% | 50.90% | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.73% | 0.21% | ||||||
Dividend yield |
0.00% | 0.00% |
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Unit Activity
The following table summarizes stock option activities and related information under the 2010 Plan for the periods presented:
Number of |
Exercise |
Contractual |
Intrinsic |
|||||||||||||
Shares |
Price |
Life (in Years) |
Value |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding stock options as of December 29, 2013 |
6,542,929 | $ | 13.03 | 4.42 | $ | 14,061 | ||||||||||
Granted |
- | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited |
(177,791 | ) | $ | 13.57 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(519,992 | ) | $ | 10.28 | $ | 2,894 | ||||||||||
Outstanding stock options as of March 30, 2014 |
5,845,146 | $ | 13.27 | 4.13 | $ | 26,973 | ||||||||||
Total vested and exercisable as of March 30, 2014 |
4,696,272 | $ | 13.87 | 3.85 | $ | 19,482 |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
No income tax benefit was realized from stock option exercises for the three months ended March 30, 2014.
The following table summarizes RSU award activities and related information for the three months ended March 30, 2014:
RSU |
||||||||
Weighted Average |
||||||||
Number of |
Grant-date |
|||||||
Shares |
Fair Value |
|||||||
Outstanding as of December 29, 2013 |
2,384,712 | $ | 14.01 | |||||
Granted |
912,593 | $ | 15.00 | |||||
Cancelled/Forfeited |
(69,553 | ) | $ | 12.72 | ||||
Vested |
(639,229 | ) | $ | 10.58 | ||||
Outstanding as of March 30, 2014 |
2,588,523 | $ | 15.24 |
Key Executive RSU |
PSU |
|||||||||||||||
Weighted Average |
Weighted Average |
|||||||||||||||
Number of |
Grant-date |
Number of |
Grant-date |
|||||||||||||
Shares |
Fair Value |
Shares |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding as of December 29, 2013 |
974,286 | $ | 12.40 | 362,000 | $ | 7.38 | ||||||||||
Granted |
- | $ | - | 274,000 | (1) | $ | 2.25 | |||||||||
Cancelled/Forfeited |
(357,870 | ) | $ | 11.03 | (18,000 | ) | $ | 7.40 | ||||||||
Vested |
(318,781 | ) | $ | 12.77 | - | $ | - | |||||||||
Outstanding as of March 30, 2014 |
297,635 | $ | 13.65 | 618,000 | $ | 5.10 |
(1) PSU grants in fiscal 2014 are shown at a target of 274,000 shares and the maximum that can be earned on these are 411,000 shares.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
6. |
Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands except for per-share amounts) |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (22,495 | ) | $ | (14,435 | ) | ||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Denominator for basic/ diluted net loss per share, weighted average shares |
59,771 | 58,086 | ||||||
Basic / Diluted net loss per share |
$ | (0.38 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||
Potentially dilutive shares excluded from the diluted loss per share computation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive |
||||||||
- RSUs and Options |
7,081 | 4,615 | ||||||
- Conversion of Senior Exchangeable Notes |
10,814 | - | ||||||
Total antidilutive shares |
17,895 | 4,615 |
7. |
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
Intangible Assets
The following table presents the balance of intangible assets as of the dates indicated below:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated range of lives (in years) |
Gross Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Amount |
Gross Amount |
Additions |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
5 | to | 10 | $ | 140,976 | $ | (58,885 | ) | $ | 82,091 | $ | 111,376 | $ | 29,100 | $ | (53,661 | ) | $ | 86,815 | |||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
5 | to | 10 | 110,665 | (39,689 | ) | 70,976 | 91,709 | 18,800 | (36,366 | ) | 74,143 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trade names |
0.5 | to | 7 | 9,652 | (6,243 | ) | 3,409 | 8,252 | 1,400 | (5,719 | ) | 3,933 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
7 | to | 8 | 2,700 | (226 | ) | 2,474 | - | 2,700 | (142 | ) | 2,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IP R&D (1) |
- | - | - | - | 500 | - | 500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Intangible Assets |
$ | 263,993 | $ | (105,043 | ) | $ | 158,950 | $ | 211,337 | $ | 52,500 | $ | (95,888 | ) | $ | 167,949 |
(1) All of the IP R&D reached technological feasibility during the three months ended March 30, 2014 and was reclassified into developed technology.
The actual amortization expense and estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets are summarized below:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Amortization expense |
$ | 9,155 | $ | 6,813 |
Estimated Future Amortization |
||||
(in thousands) |
||||
Fiscal 2014 (remaining 9 months) |
$ | 26,044 | ||
Fiscal 2015 |
35,759 | |||
Fiscal 2016 |
35,926 | |||
Fiscal 2017 |
25,061 | |||
Fiscal 2018 |
19,607 | |||
Fiscal 2019 and beyond |
16,553 | |||
Total |
$ | 158,950 |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
Goodwill
The following table presents the balance of goodwill as of the dates indicated below:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 166,473 | $ | 166,422 |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and gross balance of intangibles assets since December 29, 2013 resulted from foreign currency translation adjustments.
8. |
Financing arrangements |
The following table summarizes the Company’s debt:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Debt obligations: |
||||||||
Term Loan | $ | 295,533 | $ | 296,135 | ||||
2.0% Senior Exchangeable Notes | 112,874 | 111,733 | ||||||
7.875% Senior Notes | - | 94,064 | ||||||
Total debt |
$ | 408,407 | $ | 501,932 | ||||
Less: current portion |
2,394 | 97,320 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 406,013 | $ | 404,612 |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes
The net carrying amount of the liability component of 2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2020 (the Notes) consists of the following:
March 30, 2014 |
||||
(in thousands) |
||||
Principal amount |
$ | 150,000 | ||
Unamortized debt discount |
$ | 37,126 | ||
Net carrying value |
$ | 112,874 |
The following table presents the interest expense recognized on the Notes:
Three Months Ended |
||||
March 30, 2014 |
||||
(in thousands) |
||||
Contractual interest expense at 2% per annum |
$ | 742 | ||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
131 | |||
Accretion of debt discount |
1,141 | |||
Total |
$ | 2,014 |
Capped Calls
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company entered into capped call transactions with certain bank counterparties to reduce the potential dilution to our common stock upon exchange of the Notes. The capped call transactions have a strike price of approximately $13.87 and a cap price of approximately $18.14, and are exercisable when and if the Notes are converted. If upon conversion of the Notes, the price of the common stock is above the strike price of the capped calls, the counterparties will deliver shares of the Company’s common stock and/or cash with an aggregate value approximately equal to the difference between the price of our common stock at the conversion date (as defined, with a maximum price for purposes of this calculation equal to the cap price) and the strike price, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock related to the capped call transactions being exercised. The capped call transactions expire on September 1, 2020.
The Company is in compliance of all the covenants under its existing debt obligations as of March 30, 2014.
7.875% Senior Notes due 2017
On January 21, 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining $94.1 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 7.875% Senior Notes due 2017 (the Senior Notes) at a redemption price that was 103.938% of their face value. The Company paid an aggregate amount of $99.1 million, including redemption price, accrued and unpaid interest, and repurchase premium and recorded a loss on redemption of $4.8 million within interest and other income (expense) net in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
2012 Revolving Credit Facility
As of March 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all of the 2012 Revolving Credit Facility’s covenants. Drawdown under the 2012 Revolving Credit Facility requires that the Company meet or obtain a waiver to certain conditions including the senior secured leverage ratio not to exceed 2.75:1.00 and compliance with coverage and leverage ratios, as of the last day of the fiscal quarter most recently ended. Based on the financial results for the quarter ended March 30, 2014, the Company does not meet the maximum leverage ratio limit and has not obtained a waiver for those conditions and would not be able to draw down on the revolving credit facility. The Company did not have the need to draw on the revolving line of credit during the quarter as its cash and other liquidity were sufficient to meet its business requirements.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
9. |
Fair Value Measurement |
The fair value measurements of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities consisted of the following types of instruments categorized in the table below based upon the fair value hierarchy:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Total |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 1,588 | $ | - | $ | 1,588 | (1) | $ | 3,906 | $ | - | $ | 3,906 | (2) | ||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts |
- | 273 | 273 | - | 3,493 | 3,493 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total financial assets |
$ | 1,588 | $ | 273 | $ | 1,861 | $ | 3,906 | $ | 3,493 | 7,399 | |||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts |
$ | 3,646 | $ | 3,646 | $ | - | $ | 313 | $ | 313 | ||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
$ | - | $ | 3,646 | $ | 3,646 | $ | - | $ | 313 | $ | 313 |
(1) Total cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments of $289.4 million as of March 30, 2014 includes cash of $260.1 million held in operating accounts, $1.6 millionin money market funds, $13.7 million held in certificates of deposit and $14.1 million held in time deposit accounts. |
(2) Total cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments of $311.5 million as of December 29, 2013 includes cash of $282.2 million held in operating accounts, $3.9 million in money market funds, $11.4 million held in certificates of deposit and $14.0 million in time deposit accounts. |
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments Not Carried At Fair Value
The Company’s Term Loan and the Notes are traded in the market and the fair values are Level 1, and as they are based on quoted market prices. The Senior Notes were also traded in the market and the fair value was Level 1. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s debt obligations are as follows:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Carrying |
Estimated |
Carrying |
Estimated |
|||||||||||||
Value |
Fair Value |
Value |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Debt traded in the market: |
||||||||||||||||
Term Loan |
$ | 295,533 | $ | 296,272 | $ | 296,135 | $ | 295,170 | ||||||||
2.0% Senior Exchangeable Notes |
112,874 | 157,459 | 111,733 | 129,104 | ||||||||||||
7.875% Senior Notes |
- | - | 94,064 | 97,591 | ||||||||||||
Total Debt Obligations |
$ | 408,407 | $ | 453,731 | $ | 501,932 | $ | 521,865 |
The fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximates their carrying value.
10. |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company entered into multiple foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge certain operational exposures resulting from movements in Japanese yen (JPY) exchange rates. The Company’s hedging policy is designed to mitigate the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on operating results. Some foreign currency forward contracts were considered to be economic hedges that were not designated as hedging instruments while others were designated as cash flow hedges. Whether designated or undesignated, these forward contracts protect the Company against the variability of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from revenues and net asset or liability positions designated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar and they are not speculative in nature.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts that were designated as cash flow hedges have maturities between three and eight months. The maximum original duration of any contract allowable under the Company’s hedging policy is fifteen months.
At March 30, 2014, the Company had outstanding forward contracts to buy USD for $165.9 million. Over the next twelve months, the Company expects to reclassify $3.3 million from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings as the related forecasted transactions occur.
The following table summarizes the activity related to derivatives in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Three Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
|||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | ||||
Net loss reclassified into earnings on cash flow hedges |
1,382 | (1,753 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized hedge loss arising during the period |
(4,714 | ) | 7,743 | |||||
Ending Balance |
$ | (3,330 | ) | $ | 5,991 |
Non Designated Hedges
Total notional amounts of outstanding contracts were as summarized below:
Buy / Sell |
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 | |||
(in millions) | |||||
Japanese Yen / US dollar |
- |
JPY 2,945/$28.2 | |||
US dollar / Japanese Yen |
$42.8/JPY 4,435 |
$42.0/JPY 4,047 | |||
US dollar / EUR |
$26.5/EUR 19.2 |
$23.4/EUR 17.1 |
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
The effect of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 was as follows:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments |
||||||||
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts | ||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) recognized in OCI (1) | $ | (4,714 | ) | $ | 7,743 | |||
Net loss (gain) reclassified into earnings for cash flow hedges (2) | $ | 1,382 | $ | (1,753 | ) | |||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
||||||||
Net gain (loss) recognized in income | ||||||||
Swap interest expense (4) | $ | - | $ | 6 | ||||
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts (3) | $ | 790 | $ | (2,589 | ) |
(1) |
Net change in the fair value of the effective portion classified in other comprehensive income (OCI) |
(2) |
Effective portion classified as net product revenue |
(3) |
Classified in interest income and other (expense), net |
(4) |
Classified in interest expense |
The gross fair values of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Balance sheet location |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts |
$ | - | $ | 273 | $ | - | $ | 3,493 | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities and other |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate Swap |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts |
$ | 3,195 | $ | 451 | $ | - | $ | 313 |
The Company had an unrealized loss, and a derivative liability from its cash flow hedges for the three months ended, and as at March 30, 2014, respectively, due to the strengthening of the Yen against the US Dollar during the quarter. The Company had an unrealized gain for the three months ended March 31, 2013, and a derivative asset from its cash flow hedges as at December 29, 2013 due to the weakening of the Yen against the US Dollar during fiscal 2013. Cash flow hedges are usually entered into at the beginning of each fiscal year.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
Offsetting Derivative Assets and Liabilities
The Company presents its derivatives at gross fair values in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. However, our master netting and other similar arrangements allow net settlements under certain conditions.The following table sets forth the offsetting of derivative assets as of March 30, 2014 and December 29, 2013:
Gross amounts not offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets but have legal rights to offset |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross amounts of recognized Assets |
Gross amounts offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
Net amounts of Assets presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
Financial Instruments |
Cash collateral pledged |
Net amount |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of March 30, 2014: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
$ | 273 | $ | - | $ | 273 | $ | (273 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||||
As of December 29, 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
$ | 3,493 | $ | - | $ | 3,493 | $ | (1,572 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,921 |
The following table sets forth the offsetting of derivative liabilities as of March 30, 2014 and December 29, 2013:
Gross amounts not offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets but have legal rights to offset |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross amounts of recognized Liabilities |
Gross amounts offset in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
Net amounts of Liabilities presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
Financial Instruments |
Cash collateral pledged |
Net amount |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of March 30, 2014: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
$ | 3,646 | $ | - | $ | 3,646 | $ | (1,871 | ) | $ | - | $ | 1,775 | |||||||||||
As of December 29, 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
$ | 313 | $ | - | $ | 313 | $ | (226 | ) | $ | - | $ | 87 |
11. |
Employee related pension obligation |
The Company accounts for its participation in the Fujitsu Defined Benefit Plan (Pension Plan) on behalf of the employees transferred as part of the MCA business acquisition (Plan participants) as a multiemployer plan. The Company recorded pension expense of $1.5 million for the quarter ended March 30, 2014 and had an unpaid liability of $0.5 million as of March 30, 2014. The Company has also recorded $22.9 million as Restricted Cash and $22.9 million in Accrued compensation and benefits in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet relating to the estimated underfunded portion of the plan.
The Company may also be subject to additional liabilities imposed by law as a result of its participation in the Pension Plan. The Pension Plan imposes certain liabilities upon an employer who is a contributor to a multi-employer pension plan if the employer withdraws from the plan or the plan is terminated or experiences a mass withdrawal. These liabilities include an allocable share of the unfunded vested benefits in the plan for all plan participants, not merely the benefits payable to a contributing employer’s own retirees. As a result, participating employers may bear a higher proportion of liability for unfunded vested benefits if other participating employers cease to contribute or withdraw, with the reallocation of liability being more acute in cases when a withdrawn employer is insolvent or otherwise fails to pay its withdrawal liability.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
On January 15, 2014, the Company received approval from the transferred employees' union to exit from the Fujitsu Defined Benefit Plan, and establish a Spansion managed defined contribution plan and a cash balance plan (defined benefit plan). The Company also recorded an estimated additional expense of $2.1 million due to certain plan participants whose long-term retirement benefits are unfavorably impacted by the move from the Fujitsu Defined Benefit Plan to the Spansion defined contribution and cash balance plan. This estimated amount has been recorded as a part of the Accrued compensation and benefits in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 30, 2014.
On April 1, 2014, the Company withdrew from the Fujitsu Defined Benefit Plan and set up a defined contribution plan and a cash balance plan, which is an unfunded defined benefit plan. The assets withdrawn will ultimately be transferred to Spansion's defined contribution plan in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The restricted cash transferred from FSL as part of the MCA business acquisition will be distributed to the plan participants during the third quarter of fiscal 2014 or rolled over to Spansion’s defined contribution plan over a four year period, at the plan participant’s option.
12. |
Income Taxes |
The following table presents the Company’s income tax expense:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | (2,447 | ) | $ | (2,388 | ) |
The Company recorded income tax expense of $2.4 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013.
The tax expense for the three months ended March 30, 2014 was primarily attributable to pre-tax income in foreign jurisdictions and withholding taxes related to Samsung licensing revenue.
The tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily attributable to pre-tax income in foreign jurisdictions and withholding taxes related to Samsung licensing revenue.
As of March 30, 2014, all of the Company's U.S. deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities continue to be subject to a full valuation allowance. The valuation allowance is based on the Company's assessment that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realizable in the foreseeable future.
As of December 29, 2013, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $1,024 million and $219.8 million, respectively. Approximately $489.7 million of the federal net operating loss carry forwards are subject to an annual limitation of $27.2 million. These net operating losses, if not utilized, expire from 2016 to 2033. The Company also has U.S. federal credit carryovers of $3.3 million, which expire from 2020 to 2033. The Company also has state tax credits of $18.2 million, which includes California state tax credits of $17.5 million, which can be carried forward indefinitely.
If the Company were to undergo an “ownership change” for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its ability to utilize its federal net operating loss carry forwards could be limited under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, the Company could incur greater tax liabilities than it would in the absence of such a limitation and any incurred liabilities could materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
13. |
Restructuring and Others |
Fiscal 2013 Restructuring Plan
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2013, in an effort to lower its expense levels, given the competitive pricing pressures and slower than expected growth in Japan revenues from Flash products, the Company implemented a reduction in force to rationalize its global workforce.
The following tables present a summary of restructuring activities related to 2013 restructuring plan described above:
Three Months Ended |
||||
March 30, 2014 |
||||
(in thousands) |
||||
Accrued restructuring balance, beginning of period |
$ | 844 | ||
Non-cash adjustments |
(14 | ) | ||
Cash payments |
(772 | ) | ||
Accrued restructuring balance, end of period |
$ | 58 |
14. |
Capital Structure |
Effective January 22, 2014, SLS Spansion Holdings, LLC and its affiliates were no longer holders of greater than 10% of the Company’s voting securities. Consequently, the one outstanding share of Class B Common Stock was converted into one share of Class A Common Stock.
15. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Purchase Commitments
The Company had $113.4 million of purchase commitments with certain suppliers, primarily for inventory items as of March 30, 2014.
Guarantees
In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these types of agreements due to the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments under these types of agreements have not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and various other tax authorities. The Company has reserved for potential adjustments to the provision for income taxes that may result from examinations by, or any negotiated agreements with, these tax authorities, and the Company believes that the final outcome of these examinations or agreements will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations. If events occur which indicate payment of these amounts is unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in the recognition of tax benefits in the period the Company determines the liabilities are no longer necessary. If the estimates of the federal, state, and foreign income tax liabilities are less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would result.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
Product Warranties
The Company generally offers a one-year limited warranty for all its products. Changes in the Company’s liability for product warranty were as follows:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 2,055 | $ | 2,124 | ||||
Provision for warranties issued |
567 | 296 | ||||||
Settlements made |
(207 | ) | (806 | ) | ||||
Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties during the period |
63 | (36 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 2,478 | $ | 1,578 |
Legal Matters
In the Matter of Certain flash memory chips and Products Containing the Same, U.S International Trade Commission (Investigation No. 337-TA-893).
On August 1, 2013, Spansion LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), to request the United States International Trade Commission (“ ITC”) institute an investigation relating to the unlawful importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain Macronix flash memory chips (“Macronix Chips”) that infringe certain claims of six of the Company’s valid patents, and/or are made, produced or processed under, or by means of, a process covered by the claims of the Company’s patents, and products containing the Macronix Chips.
On September 9, 2013, the ITC instituted its investigation. Other than the Company, the principal parties, or respondents in the investigation are Macronix International Co, Ltd., of Hsin-chu, Taiwan; Macronix America, Inc., of Milpitas, CA; Macronix Asia Limited of Kanagawa Pref., Japan; Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., of Sa Tin, N.T., Hong Kong; Acer Inc. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America Corporation of San Jose, CA; ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Asus Computer International of Fremont, CA; Belkin International, Inc., of Playa Vista, CA; D-Link Corporation of Taipei City, Taiwan; D-Link System, Inc., of Fountain Valley, CA; Netgear Inc., San Jose, CA; Nintendo Co., Ltd., of Kyoto, Japan; and Nintendo of America, Inc., of Redmond, WA.
In orders dated April 2, 2014 and April 14, 2014 the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for this investigation announced his retirement and ordered that the investigation’s trial be taken off calendar. On May 1, 2014, the ITC notified the parties that the case would be assigned to the Chief Administrative Law Judge. The trial date has been scheduled for October 2, 2014.
Through this investigation, the Company seeks a general exclusion order to exclude from importation all infringing Macronix Chips and downstream products containing such chips. In the event that the ITC is unwilling to issue a general exclusion order, the Company seeks that a limited exclusion order be entered against each named Respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates in order to remedy the Respondents’ violation of Section 337 and to prevent such future violations by Respondents. The Company has also asked the ITC to issue a cease and desist order to ensure compliance with the requested exclusion orders.
The ITC has entered a target date of May 22, 2015, for completion of its investigation.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
Spansion LLC v. Macronix International Co., Ltd. et. al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (No. 3:13-cv-03566).
On August 1, 2013, Spansion LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose Division), case no. 3:13-cv-03566-JST, against Macronix International Co., Ltd., Macronix America, Inc., Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation, ASUSTek Computer Inc., Asus Computer International (America), Belkin International, Inc., D-Link Systems, Inc., NETGEAR Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., and Nintendo of America, Inc. for infringement of the patents involved in the ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-893. Spansion has asked for monetary damages as well as permanent injunctive relief to prevent further infringing activity.
On August 29, 2013, the Company amended its original complaint to delete certain defendants, resulting in the eleven party defendants identified above (“Defendants”), and to make certain additional allegations.
On October 8, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659, each of the Defendants asserted its statutory right to a mandatory stay of all proceedings in the Northern District of California action until the determination of the ITC becomes final (see In the Matter of Certain flash memory Chips and Products Containing the Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-893, U.S. International Trade Commission, above). Because the requested stay is mandated by statute, the Company did not oppose the motion and the requested stay was granted.
Macronix International Co., LTD. v. Spansion Inc. et. al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (No. 4:14-cv-01890).
On October 2, 2013, Macronix International Co., Ltd. filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, case no. 3:13-cv-679-REP, against Spansion Inc. and Spansion LLC for infringement of seven Macronix patents. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages as well as injunctive relief.
The Company filed an answer to the complaint as well as motions to dismiss and to transfer jurisdiction.
On March 10, 2014 the court ruled favorably on both of Spansion's motions, ordering Macronix to file an amended complaint and transferring the case to the Northern District of California. The Company answered the amended complaint, denying all allegations of infringement and asserting defenses of patent invalidity.
On April 28, 2014, the case was officially transferred to the Northern District of California, Oakland Division (Case No. 4:14-cv-01890).
In the Matter of Certain flash memory chips and Products Containing the Same, U.S. International Trade Commission (Investigation No.337-TA-909).
On December 27, 2013, Macronix International Co., Ltd. and Macronix America, Inc., filed a complaint pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), to request that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) institute an investigation relating to the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain non-volatile memory products (“Spansion Chips”) and products containing the Spansion Chips. A revised complaint was filed on December 31, 2013, and a letter supplementing the revised complaint was filed on January 14, 2014. The revised complaint alleges that the Spansion Chips infringe certain claims of three patents owned by Macronix (“Macronix Patents”), and/or are made, produced or processed under, or by means of, a process covered by the claims of the Macronix Patents.
On January 29, 2014, the Commission instituted its investigation. Other than the Company, the principal parties, or respondents in the investigation are Beats Electronics LLC of Santa Monica, CA, Delphi Automotive PLC of Kent, United Kingdom, Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC of Troy, Michigan, Harman International Industries, Inc. of Stamford, CT, Harman Becker Automotive Systems, Inc. of Farmington Hills, MI, Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH of Karlsbad, Germany, Ruckus Wireless, Inc. of Sunnyvale, CA and Tellabs, Inc. of Naperville, IL.
In an order dated March 5, 2014 the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for this investigation set trial for October 21-28, 2014.
Through this investigation, Macronix seeks a general exclusion order to exclude from importation all infringing Spansion Chips and downstream products containing such chips. In the event that the ITC is unwilling to issue a general exclusion order, Macronix seeks that a limited exclusion order be entered against each named Respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates in order to remedy the Respondents’ violation of Section 337 and to prevent such future violations by Respondents. Macronix has also asked the ITC to issue a cease and desist order to ensure compliance with the requested exclusion orders.
The ITC has entered a target date of May 4, 2015, for completion of its investigation.
Spansion LLC v. Macronix International Co., Ltd. et. al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (No. 5:14-cv-01946).
On April 28, 2014, Spansion LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:14-cv-01946, against Macronix International Co, Ltd; Macronix America, Inc.; Acer Inc.; Acer America Corporation; ADT Corporation; Amazon.com, Inc.; ASRock Inc.; ASRock America, Inc.; ASUSTek Computer Inc.; Asus Computer International (America); Belkin International, Inc.; D-Link Corporation; D-Link Systems, Inc.; Leap Motion, Inc.; Lowe’s Companies, Inc.; Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc.; Microsoft Corp.; Nintendo Co., Ltd.; Nintendo of America, Inc.; Sercomm Corp.; Vonage Holdings Corp.; Vonage America Inc.; and Vonage Marketing LLC for infringement of the same patents asserted in ITC Docket No 3010, below. Spansion has asked for monetary damages as well as permanent injunctive relief to prevent further infringing activity.
In the Matter of Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same, U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC Docket No. 3010).
On April 29, 2014, Spansion LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), to request the United States International Trade Commission (“ ITC”) institute an investigation relating to the unlawful importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain Macronix non-volatile memory chips (“Macronix Chips”) that infringe certain claims of four of the Company’s valid patents, and/or are made, produced or processed under, or by means of, a process covered by the claims of the Company’s patents, and products containing the Macronix Chips.
Spansion Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) (Unaudited)
The Company’s complaint names the following parties as Proposed Respondents: Macronix International Co, Ltd., of Hsin-chu, Taiwan; Macronix America, Inc., of Milpitas, CA; Macronix Asia Limited of Kanagawa Pref., Japan; Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., of Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong; Acer Inc. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America Corporation of San Jose, CA; ADT Corporation of Boca Raton, FL; Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, WA; ASRock Inc. of Taipei City, Taiwan; ASRock America, Inc. of Chino, CA; ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Asus Computer International of Fremont, CA; Belkin International, Inc., of Playa Vista, CA; D-Link Corporation of Taipei City, Taiwan; D-Link Systems, Inc., of Fountain Valley, CA; Leap Motion, Inc. of San Francisco, CA; Lowe’s Companies, Inc. of Mooresville, NC; Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. of Wilkesboro, NC; Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, WA; Nintendo Co., Ltd., of Kyoto, Japan; Nintendo of America, Inc., of Redmond, WA; Sercomm Corp. of Taipei, Taiwan; Vonage Holdings Corp. of Holmdel, NJ; Vonage America Inc. of Holmdel, NJ; and Vonage Marketing LLC of Holmdel, NJ.
In its complaint, the Company seeks a general exclusion order to exclude from importation all infringing Macronix Chips and downstream products containing such chips. In the event that the ITC is unwilling to issue a general exclusion order, the Company seeks that a limited exclusion order be entered against each named Proposed Respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates in order to remedy the Proposed Respondents’ violation of Section 337 and to prevent such future violations by the Proposed Respondents. The Company has also asked the ITC to issue a cease and desist order to ensure compliance with the requested exclusion orders.
The ITC is expected to decide whether to institute an investigation based on the Company’s complaint before the end of May 2014.
Others
Besides the above, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arose in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the aggregate liability, if any, with respect to all of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, result of operations or cash flows.
16. |
Ongoing Bankruptcy Related Matters |
In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings (“Proceedings”) in May 2010, a claims agent was appointed to analyze and, at its discretion, contest outstanding disputed claims totaling $1.5 billion. As of March 30, 2014, the Company had resolved all of these claims.
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. Forward-looking statements may include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue” or other wording indicating future results or expectations. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual events or results may differ materially. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, those discussed under “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2014. These risks include our ability to: accurately forecast customer demand for our products; manage risks associated with our investment in new business strategies and acquisitions, such as our acquisition of the MCA business from Fujitsu; maintain our distribution relationships and channels in the future; manage risks associated with our global customer base and support structure; maintain and manage relations with third party manufacturers; maintain manufacturing efficiency; and protect our intellectual property and defend against infringement or other intellectual property claims. We encourage you to read that secton of our Annual Report carefully. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect any events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report, or to conform such statements to actual results or changes in our expectations.
Overview
We are a leading designer, manufacturer and developer of embedded systems semiconductors, which include flash memory, microcontroller, mixed-signal and analog products and embedded system-on-chip solutions. Our leading-edge intellectual property and products are driving the development of high quality, reliable and economical devices that are high performing, intelligent, efficient and secure.
The embedded markets we focus on are transportation, industrial, consumer, communications and gaming. These markets require reliable flash memory solutions, microcontrollers, mixed-signal and analog and other programmable semiconductors that run applications in a broad range of electronic systems. The embedded markets are generally characterized by longer design and product life cycles, relatively stable pricing, more predictable supply-demand outlook and lower capital investments. Within this embedded industry, we serve a well-diversified customer base through a predominantly differentiated, non-commodity, service oriented model that strives to meet our customers’ needs. Our embedded solutions are incorporated in products manufactured by leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). We spend many years refining our product and service strategy to address market requirements and deliver high-quality products that go into a broad range of electronic applications such as automobiles, airplanes, set top boxes, games, telecommunications equipment, smart meters, factory automation and medical devices.
Our products are designed to accommodate various voltage, interface and density requirements for a wide range of applications and customer platforms. The majority of our NOR flash memory product designs are based on our proprietary two-bit-per-cell MirrorBit® technology, which has a simpler cell architecture, higher
yields and lower costs than competing floating gate NOR flash memory technology. While we are most known for our NOR products, we are continuing to expand our portfolio in the areas of NAND flash memory, microcontroller, mixed-signal and analog products, as well as programmable system solutions or embedded system-on-chip solutions to broaden our customer engagement and bring differentiated products to embedded markets.
In addition to product sales, we generate revenue by licensing our intellectual property to third parties and we assist our customers in developing and prototyping their designs by providing software and hardware development tools, drivers and simulation models for system-level integration.
Sale of Sunnyvale property
On January 23, 2014, we sold our property in Sunnyvale, California, consisting of 24.5 acres of land with approximately 471,000 square feet of buildings that include its headquarters building and submicron development center, a Pacific Gas & Electric transmission facility and a warehouse building, for net consideration of $58.9 million. We concurrently leased back approximately 170,000 square feet of the headquarters building on a month to month basis with the option to continue the lease for up to 24 months; thereafter, either party to the lease agreement can terminate the lease. The first six months of the lease-back are rent free. For accounting purpose, the rents relating to the rent-free period are assumed to have been netted off against the sale proceeds and represent prepaid rent. Our rent-free use of this building constitutes continuing involvement by the lessee and recognition of the sale and the related gain is deferred until such time the leaseback is at market rates.
Due to our continuing involvement under the lease, the cash proceeds net of costs, were recorded under the financing method as a short term financing obligation in accordance with the authoritative guidance on leases and sale of real estate. Interest will be imputed on the financing obligation until such time that the sale can be recognized. The property continues to remain on our books and the buildings will be depreciated over their remaining useful life. As of March 30, 2014, $58.9 million was recorded in Accrued liabilities and other as a financing obligation. After the rent-free period, a portion of the lease payments will be recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion will be recognized as interest expense.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting estimates or significant accounting policies during the three months ended March 30, 2014 as compared to the discussion in Part II, Item 7 and in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013.
Results of Operations
Comparison of Net Sales, Gross Profit, Research and Development expense , Sales, General and Administrative expense, Interest and Other Income (Expense), Interest Expense and Provision for Income Taxes
The following is a summary of our operating results:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
Variance |
||||||||||
(in thousands, except for percentages) |
||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 311,750 | $ | 189,572 | $ | 122,178 | ||||||
Cost of sales |
221,918 | 143,717 | 78,201 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
89,832 | 45,855 | 43,977 | |||||||||
Gross margin |
28.8 | % | 24.2 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||
Research and development |
43,562 | 22,777 | 20,785 | |||||||||
Sales, general and administrative |
55,631 | 28,483 | 27,148 | |||||||||
Operating loss |
(9,361 | ) | (5,405 | ) | (3,956 | ) | ||||||
Interest and other income (expense), net |
(4,600 | ) | 962 | (5,562 | ) | |||||||
Interest expense |
(6,087 | ) | (7,604 | ) | 1,517 | |||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(2,447 | ) | (2,388 | ) | (59 | ) |
Net Sales
Net sales increased by $122.2 million from $189.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, to $311.8 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014. The increase was due to the inclusion of $141.2 million of revenues from the MCA business acquired in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 which was partially offset by $31.4 million decrease in flash memory sales. The decline in embedded sales was mainly due to lower consumer and gaming revenues, and a downward pressure on selling prices.
Geographically, revenue was derived from the following regions:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Revenue ($ in thousands) |
% of Revenue |
Revenue ($ in thousands) |
% of Revenue |
|||||||||||||
Japan |
102,877 | 33.0 | % | 41,706 | 22.0 | % | ||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
99,760 | 32.0 | % | 68,246 | 36.0 | % | ||||||||||
Europe |
49,880 | 16.0 | % | 36,019 | 19.0 | % | ||||||||||
Americas |
24,940 | 8.0 | % | 24,644 | 13.0 | % | ||||||||||
Korea |
21,823 | 7.0 | % | 11,374 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||
Licensing and other |
12,470 | 4.0 | % | 7,583 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
311,750 | 100.0 | % | 189,572 | 100.0 | % |
Gross Profit
Our gross profit increased by $44.0 million from $45.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $89.8 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014. The gross margin increased from 24.2% in the three months ended March 31, 2013 to 28.8% in three months ended March 30, 2014. The increase in gross profit / margin was mainly attributable to revenues from the MCA business, reduced manufacturing costs and additional licensing revenues. These factors were partially offset by reduced profits from revenues in the embedded market due to decline in consumer and gaming revenues as described under Net Sales above, and by a lesser extent changes in product sales mix.
Research and Development (R&D)
R&D expenses increased by $20.8 million from $22.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $43.6 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014 mainly due to incremental expense relating to the MCA business.
Sales, General and Administrative (SG&A)
SG&A expenses increased by $27.1 million from $28.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $55.6 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014. The increase was mainly due to incremental SG&A expenses relating to the MCA business, $5.0 million of MCA business integration costs, and $5.8 million of higher legal expenses mainly due to the Macronix patent infringement litigation. The business integration costs are related to expenses incurred for integrating our MCA business customers who are currently on Fujitsu legacy systems to our own Spansion driven systems.
Interest and Other Income (Expense), net
Interest and other income (expense), net, decreased by $5.6 million from income of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to an expense of $4.6 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014. The decrease was due to $4.8 million of costs incurred to repurchase $94.0 million of the remaining 7.875% Senior Notes and $0.8 million of higher gain on liquidation of previously impaired investments in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $1.5 million from $7.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 to $6.1 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014 due to a lower rate of interest on our debt. We fully redeemed 7.875% Senior Notes due 2017 (the Senior Notes) in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our tax expense was flat at $2.4 million for the three months ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013.
The tax expense for the three months ended March 30, 2014 was primarily attributable to income in foreign jurisdictions and withholding taxes related to Samsung licensing revenue.
The tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily attributable to income in foreign jurisdictions and withholding taxes related to Samsung licensing revenue.
As of March 30, 2014, all of our U.S. deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities continue to be subject to a full valuation allowance. The valuation allowance is based on our assessment that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realizable in the foreseeable future.
As of December 29, 2013, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $1,024.0 million and $219.8 million, respectively. Approximately $489.7 million of the federal net operating loss carry forwards are subject to an annual limitation of $27.2 million. These net operating losses, if not utilized, expire from 2016 to 2033. We also have U.S. federal credit carryovers of $3.3 million, which expire from 2020 to 2033 and state tax credits of $18.2 million, including California state tax credits of $17.5 million, which can be carried forward indefinitely.
If we were to undergo an “ownership change” for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, our ability to utilize the unlimited federal net operating loss carry forwards could be limited under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, we could incur greater tax liabilities than we would in the absence of such a limitation and any incurred liabilities could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at March 30, 2014:
Total |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 and Beyond |
||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Term Loan |
$ | 299,250 | $ | 2,250 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,750 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 284,250 | ||||||||||||||
Exchangeable Senior Notes |
150,000 | - | - | - | - | - | 150,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense on Debt |
85,474 | 9,988 | 14,249 | 14,166 | 16,721 | 13,938 | 16,412 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other long term liabilities (1) |
7,166 | - | 4,554 | 2,568 | 44 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
23,820 | 6,991 | 6,394 | 5,379 | 2,998 | 1,764 | 294 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconditional purchase commitments (2) |
113,422 | 55,162 | 30,014 | 28,246 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations (3) |
$ | 679,132 | $ | 74,391 | $ | 58,211 | $ | 53,359 | $ | 23,513 | $ | 18,702 | $ | 450,956 |
(1) |
Other long term liabilities comprise of payment commitments under long term software license agreements with vendors and asset retirement obligations. |
(2) |
Unconditional purchase commitments (UPC) include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding on us and that specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. These agreements are principally related to inventory. UPCs exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. |
(3) |
As of March 30, 2014, the liability for uncertain tax positions was $17.6 million including interest and penalties. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of potential future cash flows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period in which these liabilities might be paid. |
2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes
The net carrying amount of the liability component of 2.00% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2020 (the Notes) consists of the following:
March 30, 2014 |
||||
(in thousands) |
||||
Principal amount |
$ | 150,000 | ||
Unamortized debt discount |
37,126 | |||
Net carrying value |
$ | 112,874 |
The following table presents the interest expense recognized on the Notes:
Contractual interest expense at 2% per annum |
$ | 742 | ||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
131 | |||
Accretion of debt discount |
1,141 | |||
Total |
$ | 2,014 |
Capped Calls
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we entered into capped call transactions with certain bank counterparties to reduce the potential dilution to our common stock upon exchange of the Notes. The capped call transactions have a strike price of approximately $13.87 and a cap price of approximately $18.14, and are exercisable when and if the Notes are converted. If upon conversion of the Notes, the price of our common stock is above the strike price of the capped calls, the counterparties will deliver shares of our common stock and/or cash with an aggregate value approximately equal to the difference between the price of our common stock at the conversion date (as defined, with a maximum price for purposes of this calculation equal to the cap price) and the strike price, multiplied by the number of shares of our common stock related to the capped call transactions being exercised. The capped call transactions expire on September 1, 2020.
We are in compliance of all covenants under our existing debt arrangements as of March 30, 2014.
7.875% Senior Notes due 2017
On January 21, 2014, we redeemed the remaining approximately $94.1 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Senior Notes at a redemption price that was 103.938% of their face value. We paid an aggregate amount of $99.1 million, including redemption price, accrued and unpaid interest, and repurchase premium. Loss on redemption of the Senior Notes of $4.8 million was recorded within interest and other income (expense), net.
2012 Revolving Credit Facility
As of March 30, 2014, we were in compliance with all of the 2012 Revolving Credit Facility’s covenants. Drawdown under the 2012 Revolving Credit Facility requires that we meet or obtain a waiver to certain conditions including the senior secured leverage ratio not to exceed 2.75:1.00 and compliance with coverage and leverage ratios, as of the last day of the fiscal quarter most recently ended. Based on the financial results for the quarters ended March 30, 2014, we do not meet the maximum leverage ratio limit and have not obtained a waiver for those conditions and would not be able to draw down on the revolving credit facility. We did not have the need to draw on the revolving line of credit during the quarter as our cash and other liquidity were sufficient to meet our business requirements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Requirements
As of March 30, 2014 and December 29, 2013, we had the following cash and cash equivalents and short term investments:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 260,060 | $ | 282,163 | ||||
Money market funds |
1,588 | 3,906 | ||||||
Certificates of deposit |
13,693 | 11,383 | ||||||
Time deposits |
14,054 | 14,045 | ||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments |
$ | 289,395 | $ | 311,497 |
Key components of our cash flows during the three months ended March 30, 2014 and March 31, 2013 were as follows:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
March 30, 2014 |
March 31, 2013 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 19,379 | $ | 7,514 | ||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(11,265 | ) | (6,419 | ) | ||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
(32,070 | ) | (1,826 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
360 | 286 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (23,596 | ) | $ | (445 | ) |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $19.4 million during the three months ended March 30, 2014, which consisted of net loss of $22.5 million and net increase in operating assets and liabilities of $6.5 million and net non-cash items of approximately $35.4 million. The net increase in operating assets and liabilities was due to a decrease of $5.9 million in other long term assets, a decrease of $3.5 million in prepaid expenses and other assets, a decrease of $1.6 million in accounts receivables and an increase of $2.3 million in accounts payables, accrued liabilities and accrued compensation and benefits. These factors were partially offset by a decrease of $3.2 million in deferred income and an increase of $2.7 million in inventory. Net non-cash items primarily consisted of $26.3 million in depreciation and amortization and $8.5 million of stock compensation expense.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $7.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, which consisted of net loss of $14.4 million, and a net decrease in operating assets and liabilities of $5.2 million offset by net non-cash items of approximately $27.2 million. The net decrease in operating assets and liabilities was due to a decrease of $11.4 million in accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and accrued compensation and benefits, a decrease of $4.8 million in other assets and an increase of $4.8 million in prepaid and other current assets and a decrease of $2.5 million of inventories. Net non-cash items primarily consisted of $20.4 million in depreciation and amortization and $8.6 million of stock compensation expense.
Investing Activities
Net cash used for investing activities was $11.3 million during the three months ended March 30, 2014, primarily comprised of $10.3 million used to purchase property, plant and equipment and $9.9 million used to purchase marketable securities, offset by $8.4 million in proceeds from the maturities of marketable securities.
Net cash used for investing activities was $6.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily comprised of $24.0 million used to purchase marketable securities and $12.9 million used to purchase property, plant and equipment, which were offset by $28.3 million in proceeds from the maturities of marketable securities.
Financing Activities
Net cash used for financing activities was $32.1 million during the three months ended March 30, 2014, primarily due to $94.1 million of repurchase of the Senior Notes, which was offset by $58.9 million of proceeds from the sale of Sunnyvale building.
Net cash used for financing activities was $1.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily due to $2.1 million payments on financing arrangements, offset by $0.6 million of proceeds from issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the normal course of business, we make certain indemnities and commitments under which we may be required to make payments in relation to certain transactions. These indemnities include non-infringement of patents and intellectual property, indemnities to our customers in connection with the delivery, design, manufacture and sale of our products, indemnities to our directors and officers in connection with legal proceedings, indemnities to various lessors in connection with facility leases for certain claims arising from such facility or lease, and indemnities to other parties to certain acquisition agreements. The duration of these indemnities and commitments varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. We believe that substantially all of our indemnities and commitments provide for limitations on the maximum potential future payments we could be obligated to make. However, we are unable to estimate the maximum amount of liabilities related to our indemnities and commitments because such liabilities are contingent upon the occurrence of events which are not reasonably determinable.
As of March 30, 2014, we did not have any other significant off-balance sheet arrangements, as that term is defined in Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of Regulation S-K, promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 3. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash deposits, invested cash and debt. As of March 30, 2014, we had $260.1 million held in demand deposit accounts, $1.6 million held in overnight money market funds, $13.7 million invested in certificates of deposit, most of which were insured by FDIC and $14.1 million held in time deposits. Our cash and short-term investment position is highly liquid. Approximately $261.7 million have maturity terms of 0 to 30 days, $0.8 million have maturity terms of 31 to 90 days, $8.6 million have maturity terms of 91 to 180 days, and the remaining $18.3 million have maturity terms of 181 to 365 days at the time of purchase. Accordingly, our interest income fluctuates with short-term market conditions, but our exposure to interest rate risk is minimal due to the short term nature of our cash and investment position.
As of March 30, 2014, 28 percent of the aggregate principal amounts outstanding under our third party debt obligations were fixed rate, and 72 percent of our total debt obligations were variable rate. The Term Loan has a LIBOR floor of 1.25 percent. While LIBOR is below 1.25 percent, our interest expense will not change along with short-term change in interest rate environment. When LIBOR is above 1.25 percent, changes in interest rates associated with the Term Loan could then result in a change to our interest expense. For example, a one percent aggregate change in interest rates would increase/decrease our contractual interest expense by approximately $3.0 million annually.
Default Risk
We intend to actively monitor market conditions and developments specific to the securities and classes of securities in which we invest. We take a conservative approach to investing our funds. Our policy is to invest only in highly-rated securities with relatively short maturities, and we do not invest in securities we believe involve a higher degree of risk.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Our sales, expenses, assets and liabilities denominated in Japanese yen and other foreign currencies are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. For example,
● |
some of our manufacturing costs are denominated in Japanese yen, and other foreign currencies such as the Thai baht and Malaysian ringgit; |
● |
sales of our products to Fujitsu are denominated in both U.S. dollars and Japanese yen; and |
● |
some fixed asset purchases and sales are denominated in other foreign currencies. |
Consequently, movements in exchange rates could cause our net sales and our expenses to fluctuate, affecting our profitability and cash flows. We use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce our foreign exchange exposure on our foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. We also hedge a percentage of our forecasted revenue denominated in Japanese yen with foreign currency forward contracts. The objective of these contracts is to mitigate the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements to our operating results. We do not use these contracts for speculative or trading purposes.
We evaluate hedge effectiveness at the inception of the hedge prospectively as well as retrospectively and record any ineffective portion of the hedging instruments in interest and other income (expense) on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We do not anticipate any material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows resulting from the use of these instruments in the future, including the impact of counterparty non-performance. However, we cannot assure you that these strategies will be effective or that transaction losses can be minimized or forecasted accurately. In particular, we generally cover only a portion of our foreign currency exchange exposure. We cannot assure you that these activities will eliminate foreign currency exchange rate exposure. Failure to eliminate this exposure could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The following table provides information about our foreign currency forward contracts as of March 30, 2014 and December 29, 2013:
March 30, 2014 |
December 29, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notional Amount |
Average Contract Rate Per USD |
Estimated Fair Value |
Notional Amount |
Average Contract Rate Per USD |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except contract rates) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Designated hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Buy JPY / Sell USD |
$ | - | ¥ |
- |
$ | - | $ | 28,232 |
¥ |
104.31 | $ | (226 | ) | |||||||||
Sell JPY / Buy USD |
$ | 42,845 | ¥ |
103.51 |
$ | (285 | ) | $ | 41,994 |
¥ |
96.36 | $ | 3,493 | |||||||||
Sell EUR / Buy USD |
$ | 26,453 | € |
0.72 |
$ | 108 | $ | 23,446 |
€ |
0.73 | $ | (87 | ) | |||||||||
Designated hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sell JPY / Buy USD |
$ | 165,869 | ¥ |
104.73 |
$ | (3,195 | ) | $ | - | ¥ | - | $ | - |
ITEM 4. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) are effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
In the matter of Certain flash memory chips and Products Containing the Same, U.S International Trade Commission (Investigation No. 337-TA-893) .
On August 1, 2013, Spansion LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), to request ITC institute an investigation relating to the unlawful importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain Macronix flash memory chips (“Macronix Chips”) that infringe certain claims of six of the Company’s valid patents, and/or are made, produced or processed under, or by means of, a process covered by the claims of the Company’s patents, and products containing the Macronix Chips.
On September 9, 2013, the ITC instituted its investigation. Other than the Company, the principal parties, or respondents in the investigation are Macronix International Co, Ltd., of Hsin-chu, Taiwan; Macronix America, Inc., of Milpitas, CA; Macronix Asia Limited of Kanagawa Pref., Japan; Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., of Sa Tin, N.T., Hong Kong; Acer Inc. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America Corporation of San Jose, CA; ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Asus Computer International of Fremont, CA; Belkin International, Inc., of Playa Vista, CA; D-Link Corporation of Taipei City, Taiwan; D-Link System, Inc., of Fountain Valley, CA; Netgear Inc., San Jose, CA; Nintendo Co., Ltd., of Kyoto, Japan; and Nintendo of America, Inc., of Redmond, WA.
In orders dated April 2, 2014 and April 14, 2014 the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for this investigation announced his retirement and ordered that the investigation’s trial be taken off calendar. On May 1, 2014, the ITC notified the parties the case would be assigned to the Chief Administrative Law Judge. The trial date has been scheduled for October 2, 2014.
Through this investigation, the Company seeks a general exclusion order to exclude from importation all infringing Macronix Chips and downstream products containing such chips. In the event that the ITC is unwilling to issue a general exclusion order, the Company seeks that a limited exclusion order be entered against each named Respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates in order to remedy the Respondents’ violation of Section 337 and to prevent such future violations by Respondents. The Company has also asked the ITC to issue a cease and desist order to ensure compliance with the requested exclusion orders.
The ITC has entered a target date of May 22, 2015, for completion of its investigation.
Spansion LLC v. Macronix International Co., Ltd. et. al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (No. 3:13-cv-03566).
On August 1, 2013, Spansion LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose Division), case no. 3:13-cv-03566-JST, against Macronix International Co., Ltd., Macronix America, Inc., Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation, ASUSTek Computer Inc., Asus Computer International (America), Belkin International, Inc., D-Link Systems, Inc., NETGEAR Inc., Nintendo Co., Ltd., and Nintendo of America, Inc. for infringement of the patents involved in the ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-893. Spansion has asked for monetary damages as well as permanent injunctive relief to prevent further infringing activity.
On August 29, 2013, the Company amended its original complaint to delete certain defendants, resulting in the eleven party defendants identified above (“Defendants”), and to make certain additional allegations.
On October 8, 2013, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659, each of the Defendants asserted its statutory right to a mandatory stay of all proceedings in the Northern District of California action until the determination of the ITC becomes final (see In the Matter of Certain flash memory Chips and Products Containing the Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-893, U.S. International Trade Commission, above). Because the requested stay is mandated by statute, the Company did not oppose the motion and the requested stay was granted.
Macronix International Co., LTD. v. Spansion Inc. et. al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (No. 4:14-cv-01890).
On October 2, 2013, Macronix International Co., Ltd. filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, case no. 3:13-cv-679-REP, against Spansion Inc. and Spansion LLC for infringement of seven Macronix patents. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages as well as injunctive relief.
The Company filed an answer to the complaint as well as motions to dismiss and to transfer jurisdiction.
On March 10, 2014 the court ruled favorably on both of Spansion's motions, ordering Macronix to file an amended complaint and transferring the case to the Northern District of California. The Company answered the amended complaint, denying all allegations of infringement and asserting defenses of patent invalidity.
On April 28, 2014, the case was officially transferred to the Northern District of California, Oakland Division (Case No. 4:14-cv-01890).
In the Matter of Certain flash memory chips and Products Containing the Same, U.S. International Trade Commission (Investigation No.337-TA-909).
On December 27, 2013, Macronix International Co., Ltd. and Macronix America, Inc., filed a complaint pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), to request that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) institute an investigation relating to the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain non-volatile memory products (“Spansion Chips”) and products containing the Spansion Chips. A revised complaint was filed on December 31, 2013, and a letter supplementing the revised complaint was filed on January 14, 2014. The revised complaint alleges that the Spansion Chips infringe certain claims of three patents owned by Macronix (“Macronix Patents”), and/or are made, produced or processed under, or by means of, a process covered by the claims of the Macronix Patents.
On January 29, 2014, the Commission instituted its investigation. Other than the Company, the principal parties, or respondents in the investigation are Beats Electronics LLC of Santa Monica, CA, Delphi Automotive PLC of Kent, United Kingdom, Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC of Troy, Michigan, Harman International Industries, Inc. of Stamford, CT, Harman Becker Automotive Systems, Inc. of Farmington Hills, MI, Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH of Karlsbad, Germany, Ruckus Wireless, Inc. of Sunnyvale, CA and Tellabs, Inc. of Naperville, IL.
In an order dated March 5, 2014 the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for this investigation set trial for October 21-28, 2014.
Through this investigation, Macronix seeks a general exclusion order to exclude from importation all infringing Spansion Chips and downstream products containing such chips. In the event that the ITC is unwilling to issue a general exclusion order, Macronix seeks that a limited exclusion order be entered against each named Respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates in order to remedy the Respondents’ violation of Section 337 and to prevent such future violations by Respondents. Macronix has also asked the ITC to issue a cease and desist order to ensure compliance with the requested exclusion orders.
The ITC has entered a target date of May 4, 2015, for completion of its investigation.
Spansion LLC v. Macronix International Co., Ltd. et. al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (No. 5:14-cv-01946).
On April 28, 2014, Spansion LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 5:14-cv-01946, against Macronix International Co, Ltd; Macronix America, Inc.; Acer Inc.; Acer America Corporation; ADT Corporation; Amazon.com, Inc.; ASRock Inc.; ASRock America, Inc.; ASUSTek Computer Inc.; Asus Computer International (America); Belkin International, Inc.; D-Link Corporation; D-Link Systems, Inc.; Leap Motion, Inc.; Lowe’s Companies, Inc.; Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc.; Microsoft Corp.; Nintendo Co., Ltd.; Nintendo of America, Inc.; Sercomm Corp.; Vonage Holdings Corp.; Vonage America Inc.; and Vonage Marketing LLC for infringement of the same patents asserted in ITC Docket No 3010, below. Spansion has asked for monetary damages as well as permanent injunctive relief to prevent further infringing activity.
In the Matter of Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same, U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC Docket No. 3010).
On April 29, 2014, Spansion LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, filed a complaint pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”), to request the United States International Trade Commission (“ ITC”) institute an investigation relating to the unlawful importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and/or the sale within the United States after importation of certain Macronix non-volatile memory chips (“Macronix Chips”) that infringe certain claims of four of the Company’s valid patents, and/or are made, produced or processed under, or by means of, a process covered by the claims of the Company’s patents, and products containing the Macronix Chips.
The Company’s complaint names the following parties as Proposed Respondents: Macronix International Co, Ltd., of Hsin-chu, Taiwan; Macronix America, Inc., of Milpitas, CA; Macronix Asia Limited of Kanagawa Pref., Japan; Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., of Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong; Acer Inc. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America Corporation of San Jose, CA; ADT Corporation of Boca Raton, FL; Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, WA; ASRock Inc. of Taipei City, Taiwan; ASRock America, Inc. of Chino, CA; ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; Asus Computer International of Fremont, CA; Belkin International, Inc., of Playa Vista, CA; D-Link Corporation of Taipei City, Taiwan; D-Link Systems, Inc., of Fountain Valley, CA; Leap Motion, Inc. of San Francisco, CA; Lowe’s Companies, Inc. of Mooresville, NC; Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc. of Wilkesboro, NC; Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, WA; Nintendo Co., Ltd., of Kyoto, Japan; Nintendo of America, Inc., of Redmond, WA; Sercomm Corp. of Taipei, Taiwan; Vonage Holdings Corp. of Holmdel, NJ; Vonage America Inc. of Holmdel, NJ; and Vonage Marketing LLC of Holmdel, NJ.
In its complaint, the Company seeks a general exclusion order to exclude from importation all infringing Macronix Chips and downstream products containing such chips. In the event that the ITC is unwilling to issue a general exclusion order, the Company seeks that a limited exclusion order be entered against each named Proposed Respondent and its subsidiaries and affiliates in order to remedy the Proposed Respondents’ violation of Section 337 and to prevent such future violations by the Proposed Respondents. The Company has also asked the ITC to issue a cease and desist order to ensure compliance with the requested exclusion orders.
The ITC is expected to decide whether to institute an investigation based on the Company’s complaint before the end of May 2014.
Others
Besides the above, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arose in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the aggregate liability, if any, with respect to all of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, result of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 1A. |
RISK FACTORS |
In addition to the cautionary information included in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2013 and filed with the SEC on February 25, 2014 , which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations. These risk factors do not identify all risks that we face—our operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial to our operations.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit |
Description of Exhibits | |
10.1* |
Form of Spansion Inc. Change of Control Severance Agreement to be entered into with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, adopted May 2, 2014, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Spansion Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2014, which was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2014, is hereby incorporated by reference. |
10.2* |
Form of Spansion Inc. Change of Control Severance Agreement to be entered into with certain of the Company’s Senior Executive Officers, adopted May 2, 2014, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Spansion Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 30, 2014, which was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2014, is hereby incorporated by reference. |
31.1** |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2** |
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1*** |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2*** |
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS** |
XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH** |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL** |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF** |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB** |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
101.PRE** |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
_____________________________
* |
Management agreement or compensation plan. |
** |
Filed herewith. |
*** |
Furnished herewith. Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibits be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as otherwise specifically stated in such filing. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused Amendment No. 1 to this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: July 8, 2014 | SPANSION INC. | |
/s/ Randy W. Furr | ||
|
| |
|
|
Randy W. Furr |
|
|
Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |