Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting
the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):

Yes ______ No ___X___

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form,
the Registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Yes ______ No ___X___

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned
to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A

Public Request for Proxy - Gafisa

PUBLIC REQUEST FOR PROXY

GAFISA S.A.

CNPJ/MF [Corporate Taxpayer Registry/Ministry of Finance] no. 01.545.826/0001-07

NIRE [State Enrollment] 35.300.147.952

 POLO NORTE FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO MULTIMERCADO, CNPJ no. 07.013.315/0001-12, herein represented by its manager and attorney-in-fact POLO CAPITAL GESTÃO DE RECURSOS LTDA., headquartered in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, at Avenida Ataulfo de Paiva, 204, 10º andar, CNPJ/MF no. 05.451.668/0001-79, POLO FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO EM AÇÕES, CNPJ/MF no. 07.914.903/0001-27, herein represented by its manager and attorney-in-fact POLO CAPITAL GESTÃO DE RECURSOS LTDA., headquartered in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, at Avenida Ataulfo de Paiva, 204, 10º andar, CNPJ/MF no. 05.451.668/0001-79 and VINSON FUND LLC, CNPJ no. 08.531.798/0001-00, herein represented by its attorney-in-fact POLO CAPITAL INTERNACIONAL GESTÃO DE RECURSOS LTDA., headquartered in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, at Avenida Ataulfo de Paiva, 204, 11º andar, CNPJ/MF no. 08.990.773/0001-74, jointly referred to as (“Funds”), in the capacity of holders of common shares issued by Gafisa S.A. (“Company”), hereby publicly request to shareholders of the Company, pursuant to article 22 and following of CVM Instruction no. 481/2009,  the granting of a proxy to represent them at the Company's Annual and Special Shareholders' Meeting to be held on May 11, 2012, at 10:30 a.m., at the Company's headquarters (“Shareholders' Meeting”), aiming at (i) the adoption of multiple votes for the purposes of electing members of the Company's Board of Directors; and (ii) the election of members for the Company's Audit Committee.

 Proposal of the Funds

1. Multiple vote for election of the Board of Directors

Pursuant to article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, “in the election of board members, shareholders representing at least 0.1 (one tenth) of the voting capital stock, either provided in the Bylaws or not, are entitled to require the adoption of the multiple vote process, attributing to each share as many votes as there are members of the board, providing shareholders with the right to cumulate the votes in a single candidate or distribute them among various candidates.”

 CVM Instruction no. 165/91, amended by CVM Instruction no. 282/98, has established a scale based on the capital stock amount of the publicly-held company, for the adoption of the multiple vote process. Pursuant to said Instruction, and as emphasized in the Call Notice for the Shareholders' Meeting, the minimum percentage of voting capital for requiring the adoption of the multiple vote process is 5% (five per cent).

 This means that shareholders of 21,634,980 (twenty-one million, six hundred and thirty-four thousand, nine hundred and eighty) common shares issued by the Company may jointly require the adoption of the multiple vote process. However, once the multiple vote process is adopted, and considering that (i) the total number of board members will be 9 (nine), as proposed by Management for this Shareholders' Meeting, and (ii) all shareholders of voting shares will be present at the Shareholders' Meeting, 43,269,959 (forty-three million, two hundred and sixty-nine thousand, nine hundred and fifty-nine) common shares issued by the Company will be necessary for the election of 1 (one) Board member.

2. Election of the Audit Committee

In relation to the election of the Company's Audit Committee, we propose the casting of votes in relation to the election of the following effective members and respective alternates, in the order of preference indicated in the chart below.

 Effective Members

Alternates

Only for the purposes of clarification, we point out that, pursuant to the 4th paragraph of article 161 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, “in the constitution of an audit committee, the following rules will be complied with: a) holders of preferred shares with no voting rights, or with restricted voting rights, will be entitled to elect, in a separate voting, 1 (one) member and their respective deputy; minority shareholders will have the same right, providing that they jointly represent 10% (ten per cent) or more of the voting shares.” 

 Therefore, if the minimum percentage mentioned above is reached, minority shareholders will be provided with a separate voting for the election of members of the Company's Board of Directors, which will increase the chances of one of the members indicated above being elected.

 Information on each of the members indicated above, including a brief history, and all other documents related to this public request for proxy, including the vote justification, proxy template and the procedures for granting proxies, as well as the information required by Attachment 23 of CVM Instruction no. 481/09, are available on the website www.agogafisa.com.br and on the website of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (www.cvm.gov.br).

 The proxy template provided by the Funds contains an indication of all other matters of the Shareholders' Meeting Agenda, for the convenience of the grantors. It is recommended that the grantors analyze the whole documentation related to the matters contained in the Shareholders' Meeting Agenda, available on the Company's website (www.gafisa.com.br/ri), on the website of BM&FBOVESPA S.A. – São Paulo Stock, Commodities and Futures Exchange (www.bmfbovespa.com.br) and on the website of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (www.cvm.gov.br), particularly the following documents: (i) annual management report; (ii) the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011; (iii) the independent auditors' report; and (iv) management's proposal.

 The proxies granted as a result of this public request for proxy must be submitted to the Funds until May 7, 2012, according to the procedures described in Attachment (iv) to this request.

THIS PUBLIC REQUEST FOR PROXY (INCLUDING ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION) WAS ISSUED BY DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER POLO NORTE FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO MULTIMERCADO AND FILED WITH THE BRAZILIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION.  GAFISA IS SUBMITTING THIS DOCUMENT ON A CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 6-K SO ALL ITS SHAREHOLDERS HAVE ACCESS TO THE SAME INFORMATION.  GAFISA STRONGLY RECOMMENDS ITS SHAREHOLDERS REJECT THE PROXY REQUEST FROM THIS DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER AND VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AGENDA PROPOSED BY THE COMPANY FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING AS SET FORTH IN ITS NOTICE TO SHAREHOLDERS DATED MAY 4, 2012.

The following were attached to this public request for proxy:

1. Vote justification
2. Information required by Attachment 23 of CVM Instruction no. 481/09.
3. Brief history of the candidates to comprise the Board of Directors and Audit Committee
4. Proxy template
5. Manual of procedures for granting proxies

Public Request for Proxy

Gafisa S.A.

Attachment (i)

Vote justification or reason why Gafisa’s shareholders should consider joining the PPP [Public-Private Partnership] proposed by Polo:

1. Representativeness of the Board of Directors and approach between the Board of Directors and shareholders:

One of the major risks in the governance of any corporation is its isolation from the interests of shareholders. Even the best intentioned of independent directors will never have the same motivation that the owner, who ultimately bears the burden and the bonus, the success or failure of the corporation. It is a fact that the current Board has almost no economic interest in the Corporation. Most of its members are not relevant shareholder and, neither, Gafisa represents a significant portion of its assets. Perhaps this is a reason, even if unintentional, why some of the other issues subsequently related. The Board needs to properly articulate the vision of this corporation, its heading and what shall be done in the future. What are your business and core competency? What are the missing capabilities to carry out its plans? One example is the fact that, even with a colossal debt, the corporation continues the process of acquiring the remaining 20% ​​of your best deal - Alphaville, which will mean a major constraint to the corporation’s cash. Although this acquisition is due to a right of sale for the opposing party, a new Board of Directors should pay attention to the restrictions of the Corporation and considering an operation of total or partial sale of this asset, so to alleviate the lack of the current financial flexibility of Gafisa. Besides this fact, in 2011, the same Board of Directors has proposed a statutory change to shareholders in which their votes would be limited to a maximum of 5%. Faced with resistance, the proposal was abandoned and finally refused. But this "incident" is an indicator of the gap between Board of Directors and shareholders. What is the Board’s intention with this proposal? Protect shareholders from themselves or facilitate its perpetuation?

2. The decision process:
The current Board of Directors has received in recent months, according to press reports, several proposals for acquisition of the Corporation. One of these proposals, done firmly, was rejected without any consideration to the views of shareholders. Considering all the errors experienced over the last year, when the successive bad financial performance was crowned with a write-off of 35% of the Corporation’s assets, it would seem sensible that the Board of Directors shall consider that at a certain time, shareholders should have the power to decide their future. A query should be the most appropriate way.

3. Review of the Corporation’s performance, or why it seems necessary to make a change:
Gafisa, during the year 2011, had a poorly operational and financial performance. Several delays in construction and the escalating costs pressured margins and financial indicators. At the end of the year it took a write-off of 35% of its assets and renegotiation of financial covenants of its debt. Corporation shares dropped 70% from early 2011 until the present time. The corporation was threatened by debt. Although on several occasions the corporation assured shareholders that the situation of "cash burn" would be reversed during 2011, the issue is actually much worse throughout the period.
Meanwhile, what was the attitude of the Board of Directors? First, it took too long to identify the problem and then to recognize its seriousness. Was the Board of Directors going to tow the administration rather than lead it?

It is not conceivable that the corporation has taken so long to establish an impairment representing 35% of its net worth and that its origins in events that occurred in previous years, as well as in the present, and during this period the corporation has submitted results followed positive that led its shareholders to erroneous conclusions. The fact that the Corporation is not aware about these issues demonstrates the seriousness of the problem. Its alternative is an option for not informing its shareholders. What can we say about the fact that the Corporation for more than a year remained at odds with the SEC for failing to have a definitive assessment of its accounting?
The mechanisms of control of the Corporation must be urgently improved. The new Board of Directors shall ensure the development and deployment of such mechanisms.

4. What do the candidates for a new Board want?

Gafisa needs urgent decisions. Candidates understand the urgency of the issues and their severity. They closely follow the corporation because they are long time shareholders. At the same time, Gafisa has much to gain from greater transparency in the conduct of its processes and communication about its real situation. At a minimum, shareholders shall be heard when the issues that concern them and have enough information in order to decide on their investments.

Owner’s attitude. This is a fundamental attribute to make the necessary choices, both in relation to investments and divestitures, and personnel management. One of the great problems of Gafisa is its inability to manage people, resulting in high turnover and operating disruption in its operating body. This reflects failure of the management to enforce effective policies in this field. Similarly, greater diligence in identifying and investigating the problems might not have avoided all the problems of 2011 but at least would have given Gafisa greater capacity planning and also greater ability to choose how to deal with its challenges.

Public Request for Proxy

Gafisa S.A.

Attachment (ii)

Information required by Attachment 23 of CVM Instruction no. 481/09.

1. Inform the Company's name: Gafisa S.A., a publicly-held company, headquartered at Avenida das Nações Unidas, 8.501, 19º andar, in the city of São Paulo, state of São Paulo, CNPJ/MF no. 01.545.826/0001-07.

2. Legal entities that have promoted, organized and paid for the request for proxy:

1. Name and address: 

POLO CAPITAL GESTÃO DE RECURSOS LTDA., a corporation headquartered in the city of Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, at Rua Ataulfo de Paiva, nº 204, salas 1001 a 1010, Leblon, CEP 22440-030, CNPJ/MF no. 05.451.668/0001-79.

 POLO CAPITAL INTERNACIONAL GESTÃO DE RECURSOS LTDA., headquartered in the City and State of Rio de Janeiro, at Av. Ataulfo de Paiva, nº 204, salas 1101 e 1110, Leblon, CEP 22440-033, CNPJ/MF no. 08.990.773/0001-74

 A shareholder of the company since: The funds managed and represented by the legal entities described above are shareholders of the Company since February 2006.

3. Number and percentage of shares of each type and class of their ownership: 

4. Number of shares borrowed: Not applicable.

5. Total exposure in derivatives referenced to company shares: Not applicable.

6. Relationships of a corporate, business or family nature existing or maintained in the last three years with the company or with parties related to the company, as determined by the accounting rules addressing this matter: Not applicable

3. Inform if any of the persons mentioned in item 3, as well as any of their controlling companies, subsidiaries, companies under joint control or affiliated companies has a special interest in the approval of the matters for which the proxy is being requested, describing with detail the nature and extension of the interest in question. Not applicable.

4. Inform the estimated cost of the request for proxy: R$10,000.00 (ten thousand reais).

5. Inform whether the company paid for the request for proxy or if its applicants will seek refund from the company: The applicants will not seek refund from the Company.

6. Inform the address to which the proxy must be sent after being signed; or, if the company accepts proxies through systems in the world wide web, the instructions for granting the proxy: The manual of procedures for granting proxies has been attached to the public request for proxy (Attachment iv) and is available at www.agogafisa.com.br.

Public Request for Proxy

Gafisa S.A.

Attachment (iii)

Brief history of the candidates

Board of Directors

THIS PUBLIC REQUEST FOR PROXY (INCLUDING ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION) WAS ISSUED BY DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER POLO NORTE FUNDO DE INVESTIMENTO MULTIMERCADO AND FILED WITH THE BRAZILIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION.  GAFISA IS SUBMITTING THIS DOCUMENT ON A CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 6-K SO ALL ITS SHAREHOLDERS HAVE ACCESS TO THE SAME INFORMATION.  GAFISA STRONGLY RECOMMENDS ITS SHAREHOLDERS REJECT THE PROXY REQUEST FROM THIS DISSENTING SHAREHOLDER AND VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE AGENDA PROPOSED BY THE COMPANY FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETING AS SET FORTH IN ITS NOTICE TO SHAREHOLDERS DATED MAY 4, 2012.

Audit Committee

 Effective members

Alternates

Public Request for Proxy

 Gafisa S.A.

 Attachment (iv)

Proxy Template

PROXY

1. Grantors: 

[Name or corporate name], [qualification], [address]

2. Grantees: 

Daniel Alves Ferreira, Brazilian, married, registered with the São Paulo Bar Association - OAB/SP under no. 140.613; Christiano Marques de Godoy, Brazilian, single, lawyer, registered with the OAB/SP under no. 154.078; Paulo Roberto Bellentani Brandão, Brazilian, single, lawyer, registered with the OAB/SP under no. 273.180; Elke Priscila Kamrowski, Brazilian, single, lawyer, registered with the OAB/SP under no. 168.736; Anali Penteado Buratin, Brazilian, single, lawyer, registered with the OAB/SP under no. 196.610; and Nadia Andreza Oliveira, Brazilian, married, registered with the OAB/SP under no. 266.484, all with office at Rua Marquês de Paranaguá, 348 -10º andar, in the City and State of São Paulo, CEP: 01303-050, who can act jointly or severally, regardless of the order of appointment, as per the voting instructions below.

3. Powers:

Representing the Grantors in the capacity of shareholder of [___] common shares issued by Gafisa S.A., a publicly-held company headquartered at Avenida das Nações Unidas, 8.501, 19º andar, in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, CNPJ/MF no. 01.545.826/0001-07 (“Company”), with regards to the Company's Annual and Special Shareholders' Meeting to be held on May 11, 2012, at 10:30 a.m., being able to, for that purpose:

1. request the adoption of the multiple vote process for the election of members of the Company's Board of Directors, pursuant to article 141 of the Brazilian Corporate Law and CVM Instruction no. 165/91;

2. cast a vote related to the Agenda in strict compliance with the voting instructions determined below:

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING

               i.     review the accounts of directors, study, discuss and vote on the financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

[__] In favor            [__] Against              [__] Abstention

             ii.     establish the number of members that should comprise the Company's Board of Directors (in favor of or against the management's proposal, or in favor of the proposal presented by means of a public request for proxy).

[__] In favor                   [__] Against              [__] Abstention

[__] Another proposal:    [__] members.

           iii.     elect the members of the Company's Board of Directors, in the event of end of tenure (indicate the candidates in the order of preference or indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal, or the wish to abstain).

Order of preference of candidates to the positions of members of the Board of Directors:

Effective Members:

1st ______________________________________________________________

2nd ______________________________________________________________

3rd ______________________________________________________________

4th ______________________________________________________________

5th ______________________________________________________________

6th ______________________________________________________________

7th ______________________________________________________________

8th ______________________________________________________________

9th ______________________________________________________________

Deputy Members:

1st ______________________________________________________________

2nd ______________________________________________________________

3rd ______________________________________________________________

4th ______________________________________________________________

5th ______________________________________________________________

6th ______________________________________________________________

7th ______________________________________________________________

8th ______________________________________________________________

9th ______________________________________________________________

[__] In favor                         [__] Against                           [__] Abstention

           iv.     establish the global compensation amount to be paid to the Company's directors in 2012 (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal or others).

[__] In favor                        [__] Against                           [__] Abstention

[__] Another proposal:         [__] members.

             v.     install and establish the number of members that should comprise the Company's Audit Committee (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal or others).

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

[__] Another proposal:         [__] members.

           vi.     elect the members of the Company's Audit Committee, due to the end of tenure (indicate the candidates in the order of preference or indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal, or the wish to abstain).

Order of preference of candidates to the positions of members of the Audit Committee:

Effective Members:

1st ______________________________________________________________

2nd ______________________________________________________________

3rd ______________________________________________________________

Deputy Members:

1st ______________________________________________________________

2nd ______________________________________________________________

3rd ______________________________________________________________

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

         vii.     establish the global compensation amount to be paid to the members of the Company's Board of Directors in 2012 (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal or others).

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

SPECIAL SHAREHOLDERS' MEETING

               i.     amend the Article 5 of the Company's Bylaws so as to reflect the capital increases approved by the Board of Directors, within the limit of authorized capital, until the date of the Annual Shareholders' Meeting (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal).

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

             ii.     amend the 1st paragraph of Article 19 of the Company's Bylaws to provide for the possibility of opening a position in the Board of Directors in the event of vacancy of a member (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal).

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

           iii.     amend articles 27, 30, 31, 32 and compensation of the following, in order to adapt the description of positions and functions of the Board of Executive Officers to the Company's new organizational structure suggested by the Board of Directors (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal).

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

           iv.     revise the Company's Bylaws so as to adjust it to the minimum clauses disclosed by BM&FBOVESPA S.A. – São Paulo Stock, Commodities and Futures Exchange, pursuant to the new Novo Mercado Listing Regulation (indicate if you are in favor of or against the management's proposal).

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

             v.     consolidate the Company's Bylaws.

[__] In favor                           [__] Against                         [__] Abstention

3. sign the Company's Book of Shareholder Attendance and the minutes of the Annual and Special Shareholders1 Meeting; and

4. subgrant all or part of the powers hereby granted.

The powers of attorneys-in-fact is limited to requiring the adoption of the multiple vote process, attending the Annual and Special Shareholders' Meeting, and casting votes in compliance with this Proxy, not having the right or obligation to take any measure other than those required for the accurate execution of this power-of-attorney.

4. Validity:

This power-of-attorney will be valid for the Company's Annual and Special Shareholders' Equity to be held on May 11, 2012, installed either upon the first or second call, including any preliminary act required for the adoption of the multiple vote process, whereas representation during the Shareholders' Meeting is restricted to the Grantor's voting instructions. This power-of-attorney will remain in effect until the closure of the Company's Annual and Special Shareholders' Meeting.

5. Attorneys-in-fact:

1. in the case of vote for the approval of any resolutions indicated in item 3 (b), above, the persons to be appointed as attorneys-in-fact, for the purposes of article 24, item I, of CVM Instruction no. 481/09, who can act jointly or severally, regardless of the order of appointment, Messrs. Daniel Alves Ferreira and Christiano Marques de Godoy,  qualified above;

2. in the case of vote for the disapproval of any resolutions indicated in item 3 (b), above, the persons to be appointed as attorneys-in-fact, for the purposes of article 24, item I, of CVM Instruction no. 481/09, who can act jointly or severally, regardless of the order of appointment, Messrs. Paulo Roberto Bellentani Brandão and Elke Priscila Kamrowski, qualified above; and

3. in the case of vote for the abstention with regards to any resolutions indicated in item 3 (b), above, the persons to be appointed as attorneys-in-fact, for the purposes of article 24, item I, of CVM Instruction no. 481/09, who can act jointly or severally, regardless of the order of appointment, Messrs. Anali Penteado Buratin and Nadia Andreza Oliveira, qualified above.

Public Request for Proxy

Gafisa S.A.

  Attachment (v)

Manual of procedures for granting proxies

The filling of a Proxy shall observe the following instructions:

1º- Fill in the name and identification of the grantor as follows:

(i)        Individuals. Identification shall obligatorily contain the following information, in the following order: name, nationality, marital status, occupation, CPF [Individual Taxpayer’s Registry Number], RG [Identity Card Number], issuing agency and full address of domicile.

(ii)       Legal Entity. Identification shall obligatorily contain the following information, in the following order: trade name, company’s definition, principal place of business, CNPJ [Corporate Taxpayer’s Registry], name and identification of the legal representative, in the format specified in item (i) above.

(iii)      Investment Fund. Identification shall obligatorily contain the following information, in the following order: fund’s name, address, CNPJ [Corporate Taxpayer’s Registry], name and identification of the manager representing the fund and its legal representative, in the format specified in items (ii) and (i) above, respectively.

2º- Point out the voting options chosen (in favor or against or abstention).

3º- Insert place and date of signature.

4º- Sign the power of attorney.

5º- In case of legal entities or investment fund, or in other cases of representation, the name and / or position held by the legal representative who will sign the power of attorney shall be pointed out.

6º - The Grantor or its legal representative shall have their signatures certified by a notary public. In the case of power of attorney granted abroad by foreign individuals or legal entities, the signature shall be certified by a notary public or equivalent authority.

7º - Provide copy of the following documents, as appropriate:

(i)        Individuals. (a) identification card with photo (preferably RG [Identity Card], RNE [National Registry of Foreigners], CNH [Driver’s License], or even identity card officially certified by regulatory councils); and (b) proof of ownership of the Company’s shares, issued by a financial institution and / or custodian, in a maximum of three (3) days before the date of mailing the power of attorney to the address pointed out in item 5, below, demonstrating their shareholding position.

(ii)       Legal Entity. (a) most recent Articles of Incorporation or Articles of Organization consolidated and corporate documentation granting powers for representation (minutes of election and / or proxy appointment with certified signature); (b) representative’s identification card with photo (preferably RG [Identity Card], RNE [National Registry of Foreigners], CNH [Driver’s License], or even identity card officially certified by regulatory councils); and (c) proof of ownership of the Company’s shares, issued by a financial institution and / or custodian, in a maximum of three (3) days before the date of mailing the power of attorney to the address pointed out in item 5, below, demonstrating its shareholding position.

(iii)      Investment Fund. (a) certified copy of the most recent bylaw of the Investment Fund and Articles of Incorporation or Articles of Organization of its Manager, in addition to the corporate documentation granting powers for representation (minutes of election and / or proxy appointment with certified signature); (b) representative’s identification card with photo (preferably RG [Identity Card], RNE [National Registry of Foreigners], CNH [Driver’s License], or even identity card officially certified by regulatory councils); and (c) ) proof of ownership of the Company’s shares, issued by a financial institution and / or custodian, in a maximum of three (3) days before the date of mailing the power of attorney to the address pointed out in item 5, below, demonstrating its shareholding position.

Documents relating to foreign individuals or legal entities, created or issued abroad must be translated into Portuguese, certified by notary public and consulate.

8º - The proxy shall be printed and signed, with signature certified by notary public and accompanied by all documents specified in item 4 above, and sent in care of Mr. Daniel Alves Ferreira, to the following address:

Mesquita Pereira, Marcelino, Almeida, Esteves Advogados

Rua Marquês de Paranaguá, 348 -10º andar

São Paulo  SP  01303-050

Tel: (11) 3156-2340

We request the kindness of providing the sending of digitalized copy of the proxy for email proxy@mpmae.adv.br