e40vfza
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 40-F/A
|
|
|
o |
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Commission File Number 9682 |
Domtar Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrants name into English (if applicable)
Canada
(Province or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
2621
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code-Number (if applicable))
Not applicable
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number (if applicable))
395 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1L6 (514) 848-5400
(Address and telephone number of Registrants principal executive offices)
CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10011, (212) 664-1666
(Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including area code) of agent for service in the United States)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
|
|
|
Title of each class
Common Shares no par value
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
Not Applicable
(Title of Class)
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
8.75% Notes due 2006, 7.875% Notes due 2011, 5.375% Notes due 2013,
7.125% Notes due 2015 and 9
1/
2% Debentures due 2016
(Title of Class)
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
|
|
|
o Annual Information form
|
|
þ Audited annual financial statements |
[cover continued on next page]
- 2 -
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common
stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Common Shares 231,576,702 shares
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by filing the information contained in this form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). If Yes is marked, indicate the file number
assigned to the Registrant in connection with such Rule.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the last 90 days.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 40-F/A may contain forward-looking statements relating to trends in, or
representing managements beliefs about, Domtars future growth, results of operations, performance
and business prospects and opportunities. These forward-looking statements are generally denoted
by the use of words such as anticipate, believe, expect, intend, aim, target, plan,
continue, estimate, may, will, should and similar expressions. These statements reflect
managements current beliefs and are based on information currently available to management.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that,
while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and
uncertainties such as, but not limited to, general economic and business conditions, product
selling prices, raw material and operating costs, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the
ability to integrate acquired businesses into existing operations, the ability to realize
anticipated cost savings, the performance of manufacturing operations, and other factors referenced
herein and in Domtars continuous disclosure filings. These factors should be considered carefully
and undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements. Although the
forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 40-F/A are based upon what
management believes to be reasonable estimates and assumptions, Domtar cannot ensure that actual
results will not be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. Domtar assumes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to
reflect new events or circumstances. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among
other things, those discussed under Risk Factors as well as those discussed elsewhere in this
annual report on Form 40-F/A.
Form 40-F/A
Domtar Inc.
March 21, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Managements Discussion and Analysis
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Subsequent
Event
Exhibits
|
|
|
1.1
2.1 3.1 3.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Auditors
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer
CEO 906 Certification
CFO 906 Certification |
Managements
Discussion and Analysis
MONTREAL,
QUEBEC, FEBRUARY 22, 2007
Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) relates to the financial condition and results of
Domtars operations. Throughout this MD&A, unless otherwise specified, Domtar, we, us and
our refer to Domtar Inc., its subsidiaries, as well as its joint ventures, and the Corporation
refers to Domtar Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding its interest in joint ventures.
Domtars common shares are listed on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges. Except where
otherwise indicated, all financial information reflected herein is determined on the basis of
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This MD&A should be read in conjunction
with Domtars audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
In accordance with industry practice, in this MD&A, the term ton or the symbol ST refers
to a short ton, an imperial unit of measurement equal to 0.9072 metric tons, and the term tonne
or the symbol MT refers to a metric ton. In this MD&A, unless otherwise indicated, all dollar
amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars, and the term dollars and the symbols $ and CAN$
refer to Canadian dollars. The term U.S. dollars and the symbol US$ refer to United States
dollars and the term U.S. refers to the United States.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This MD&A may contain forward-looking statements relating to trends in, or representing
managements beliefs about, Domtars future growth, results of operations, performance and business
prospects and opportunities. These forward-looking statements are generally denoted by the use of
words such as anticipate, believe, expect, intend, aim, target, plan, continue,
estimate, project, may, will, should and similar expressions. These statements reflect
managements current beliefs and are based on information currently available to management.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that,
while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
historical results or those anticipated. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the
events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur, or if any occurs, what effect they
will have on Domtars results of operations or financial condition. These factors include, but are
not limited to:
|
|
|
the effect of general economic conditions, particularly in Canada and the
U.S.; |
|
|
|
|
market demand for Domtars products, which may be tied to the relative
strength of various Canadian and/or U.S. business segments; |
|
|
|
|
product selling prices; |
|
|
|
|
energy prices; |
|
|
|
|
raw material prices; |
|
|
|
|
chemical prices; |
|
|
|
|
performance of Domtars manufacturing operations including unexpected maintenance requirements; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to realize anticipated cost savings; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to integrate acquired businesses into existing operations; |
|
|
|
|
the level of competition from domestic and foreign producers; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of forestry, land use, environmental and other governmental regulations, and changes in accounting regulations; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of weather and the risk of loss from fires, floods, windstorms, hurricanes and other natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
transportation costs; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of current customers or the inability to obtain new customers; |
|
|
|
|
legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
|
changes in asset valuations, including write downs of property, plant and
equipment, inventory, accounts receivable or other assets for impairment or other
reasons; |
|
|
|
changes in currency exchange rates, particularly the relative value of the
Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of timing of retirements and changes in the market price of
Domtars common stock on charges for stock-based compensation; |
|
|
|
|
performance of pension fund investments and related
derivatives; and |
|
|
|
|
the other factors described under Risks and Uncertainties. |
These factors should be considered carefully and undue reliance should not be placed on the
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, when evaluating the information
presented in this document. Unless specifically required by law, Domtar assumes no obligation to
update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances.
2006 OVERVIEW
Our 2006 results reflected a significant improvement when compared to 2005. We benefited from
higher average selling prices for paper and pulp, higher shipments for all of our major products
except for wood (excluding the impact of mills that were indefinitely and permanently closed) and
overall lower costs partially resulting from the realization of savings stemming from restructuring
initiatives throughout our business segments. Other factors that contributed to our strengthened
financial position were the refund of softwood duties, amounting to $178 million plus interest of
$22 million (total of $164 million net of a special charge by the Canadian Government of $36
million), the realization of a gain of $237 million (net of applicable taxes of $62 million) on the
sale of our 50% interest in Norampac, the recognition of investment tax credits related to research
and development expenditures from prior years and the settlement of a sales contract dispute
resulting in a payment to us of $14 million. These factors were partially offset by the
strengthening of the Canadian dollar and lower average selling prices and shipments for wood
products due to the continuing difficult conditions prevailing in the wood sector.
As at March 31, 2006, our Cornwall pulp and paper mill and Ottawa paper mill were permanently
shut down, and as at June 30, 2006, our Vancouver paper mill and Grand-Remous and Malartic sawmills
were also permanently shut down.
PROPOSED
COMBINATION
In August
2006, we signed a definitive agreement to combine with Weyerhaeusers
fine paper business and related assets. Under the terms of the
transaction, Weyerhaeusers fine paper business, consisting of
10 primary pulp and paper mills (seven in the United States and
three in Canada), converting, forming and warehousing facilities,
sales offices, two sawmills and logging and forest management
operations will be transferred into a newly formed company for stock
and a cash payment of US$1.35 billion to be provided by the new
company through borrowings under a temporary credit facility.
Weyerhaeuser intends to distribute the shares of the new company to
its shareholders through an exchange offer. Domtar will combine with
the newly formed company to create Domtar Corporation.
The combination is subject to approvals by: the shareholders of
Domtar by a special resolution; appropriate regulatory and other
authorities (all of which have been obtained); as well as customary
closing conditions. The transaction will be submitted to our
shareholders at a special meeting to be held on February 26,
2007 and is expected to close in March 2007. As a result of this
transaction, Domtar will become an indirect subsidiary of the
Domtar Corporation, a Delaware corporation.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Effective in the second quarter of 2006, as a result of the permanent closure of our Vancouver
paper mill, the financial information pertaining to our Vancouver paper mill was no longer included
in our Papers business but presented as a discontinued operation and as assets held for sale.
Accordingly, the statement of consolidated earnings and consolidated cash flows for prior periods
have been restated to reflect this presentation. Effective December 29, 2006, the financial
information pertaining to Norampac is disclosed as a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the
statement of consolidated earnings and consolidated cash flows for 2006 and prior periods have been
restated to reflect this presentation. In accordance with GAAP, due to the fact that we continue to
sell certain products formerly produced at the Cornwall and Ottawa paper mills, those operations
remain in our continuing operations.
2
On December 29, 2006, Domtar sold its packaging segment, which consisted of a 50% interest in
Norampac, to Cascades Inc. for a total cash consideration of $560 million, resulting in a gain of
$237 million (net of applicable taxes of $62 million). As a result of this transaction, Domtar
reduced its net debt level by $560 million compared to its third quarter of 2006, improving its
balance sheet and liquidity position.
Norampac, our former joint venture in packaging, has 26 corrugated packaging plants
strategically located across Canada and the United States. Norampacs eight containerboard mills,
having a combined annual capacity of approximately 1.45 million tons, directly or indirectly
supplied essentially all the containerboard requirements of the corrugated packaging plants. In
accordance with GAAP, we accounted for our 50% interest in Norampac, up to the date of the sale,
using the proportionate consolidation method.
FINANCIAL RESULTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Norampac (net of applicable taxes) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings of Norampac |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net loss of Vancouver paper mill |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
Our 50% interest in Norampacs net earnings from January 1, 2006 to December 29, 2006 amounted
to $274 million in 2006, including a gain of $237 million (net of applicable taxes) on the sale of
our interest, compared to net earnings of $3 million in 2005. The $34 million increase in net
earnings, excluding the $237 million net gain on the sale, was mainly due to higher average selling
prices for containerboard and corrugated containers, partially offset by the negative impact of a
stronger Canadian dollar and lower shipments for containerboard and corrugated containers.
Net loss from our Vancouver paper mill amounted to $9 million in 2006, an improvement of $72
million compared to a net loss of $81 million in 2005. The improvement in the results was mainly
attributable to the $89 million decrease in restructuring costs ($60 million net of applicable
taxes) in 2006 compared to 2005 and the closure of the mill in June 2006.
See also Note 4 to the 2006 audited consolidated financial statements.
OUR BUSINESS
Domtars reporting segments correspond to the following business activities: Papers, Paper
Merchants and Wood.
PAPERS
We are the third largest integrated manufacturer and marketer of uncoated freesheet paper in
North America. We operate four pulp and paper facilities in Canada (reflecting the permanent
closures of the Cornwall pulp and paper mill and Ottawa paper mill in the first quarter of 2006 and
the permanent closure of the Vancouver paper mill in the second quarter of 2006) and five in the
United States, with an annual paper production capacity of approximately 2.3 million tons,
complemented by strategically located warehouses and sales offices. Approximately 65% of our paper
production capacity is located in the United States, and approximately 81% of our pulp and paper
sales are made to customers in the United States. Uncoated and coated freesheet papers are used for
business, commercial printing and publication, and technical and specialty applications. The chart
below illustrates the principal paper products we produce and our annual paper production capacity.
3
|
|
|
* |
|
The allocation of production capacity may vary from period to period in order to take
advantage of market conditions. We permanently closed the Cornwall pulp and paper mill and
Ottawa paper mill in the first quarter of 2006, and the Vancouver paper mill in the second
quarter of 2006. These permanent closures, impacting 450,000 tons of paper, have been assumed
to be effective as at January 1, 2006 and have been reflected in the above capacity. |
We sell paper primarily through a large network of owned and independent merchants that
distribute our paper products throughout North America. We also sell our products to a variety of
customers, including business offices, office equipment manufacturers, retail outlets, commercial
printers, publishers and converters. In addition, we sell pulp in excess of our own internal
requirements. We also purchase pulp to optimize paper production and reduce freight costs. In 2006,
our net market pulp position (the amount of pulp produced in excess of our internal requirements)
was approximately 563,000 tonnes.
Our Papers business is our most important segment, representing 64% of consolidated sales in
2006, or 70% when including sales of Domtar paper through our own Paper Merchants business.
PAPER MERCHANTS
Our Paper Merchants business comprises the purchasing, warehousing, sale and distribution of
various products made by Domtar and other manufacturers. These products include business and
printing papers and certain industrial products. Domtar-owned paper merchants operate in the United
States and Canada under a single banner and umbrella name, the Domtar Distribution Group, which is
the fifth largest paper merchant organization in North America. Ris Paper operates throughout the
Northeast, Mid-Atlantic and Midwest areas from 20 locations in the United States, including 16
distribution centers. The Canadian business operates as Buntin Reid in three locations in Ontario;
JBR/La Maison du Papier in two locations in Quebec; and The Paper House from two locations in
Atlantic Canada. Our Paper Merchants business represented 26% of consolidated sales in 2006, or 20%
when excluding sales of Domtar paper.
4
WOOD
Our Wood business comprises the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of lumber and
wood-based value-added products, and the management of forest resources. We operate eight sawmills
(four in Quebec, following the permanent closure of the Grand-Remous and Malartic sawmills in the
second quarter of 2006, and four in Ontario) and one remanufacturing facility (in Quebec), for an
annual capacity of approximately 1.1 billion board feet of lumber. We also have an interest in two
joint ventures and investments in two businesses, which all produce wood products. We seek to
optimize 17 million acres of forestland directly licensed or owned by the Corporation in Canada and
the United States through efficient management and the application of certified sustainable forest
management practices such that a continuous supply of wood is available for future needs. Our Wood
business represented 10% of consolidated sales in 2006. As at December 31, 2006, we have four
sawmills and one remanufacturing facility in operation, for an annual capacity of approximately 460
million board feet of lumber.
5
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Years ended December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
4,247 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations 1 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
Excluding specified items2 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Excluding specified items2 |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share (in dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
(1.36 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings (loss) |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share (in dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations,
excluding specified items, per segment2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papers |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
Paper Merchants |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Wood |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average exchange rates |
|
CAN$ |
1.134 |
|
|
|
1.211 |
|
|
|
1.301 |
|
|
|
US $ |
0.882 |
|
|
|
0.826 |
|
|
|
0.769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share (declared) (in dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Shares |
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
Series B Preferred Shares |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
Common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
4,955 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
5,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current portion |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations is a non-GAAP measure that is
determined by deducting cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A),
amortization expense and closure and restructuring costs from sales. We focus on operating
profit (loss) from continuing operations as this measure enables us to compare our results
between periods without regard to debt service or income taxes. As such, we believe it would
be useful for investors and other users to be aware of this measure so they can better assess
our performance. Our operating profit (loss) from continuing operations measure has no
standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and is not necessarily comparable to similar measures
presented by other companies and therefore should not be considered in isolation. |
|
2 |
|
See Specified items affecting results and non-GAAP measures. |
6
SPECIFIED ITEMS AFFECTING RESULTS AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
Our operating results include specified items that, in our view, do not typify normal operating
activities, thus affecting the comparability of our results from period to period. To measure our
performance and that of our business segments from period to period without regard to variations
caused by these specified items, we focus on certain measures excluding specified items. These
financial measures excluding specified items are non-GAAP measures. We define specified items as
items such as the impacts of impairment of assets, facility or machine closures, changes in income
tax legislation, debt restructuring, unrealized mark-to-market gains or losses on hedging contracts
not considered as hedges for accounting purposes, foreign exchange impact on long-term debt
translation and other items that, in our view, do not typify normal operating activities.
Our Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
presented as a line item sub total on the face of our GAAP statement of earnings. This non-GAAP
measure is also used by management, as well as investors, to evaluate operations. Management
believes that Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations, as presented, represents a useful
means of assessing the performance of the Companys ongoing operating activities, as it reflects
the Companys earnings trends without showing the impact of certain charges.
We believe that it is useful for investors and other users to be aware of the specified items
that positively or adversely impacted our GAAP results, and that these non-GAAP measures provide
investors and other users with a measure of performance to compare our results between periods
without regard to these specified items.
Management uses both GAAP and non-GAAP measures to evaluate results of operations and believes
that investors and other readers should be aware of both measures in order to more meaningfully
evaluate operations. Some of the key users of our financial information, including analysts and
creditors, request that we make these measures publicly available.
The use of Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations has certain material limitations
because it excludes the recurring expenditures of financing expenses and income taxes. Financing
expenses is a necessary component of our expenses because we borrow money to finance our working
capital and capital expenditures. Income tax expense is also a necessary component of our expenses
because we are required to pay cash income taxes. Management compensates for these limitations to
the use of Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations by using it as only a supplementary
measure of profitability.
We believe that the impact of the key drivers of our business i.e. price, volume and foreign
exchange, on our results are more readily understandable when we separate out the identified
specified items. The specified items are then separately identifiable and discussed in detail so
that the impact of those items on our results may be understood. We believe this gives the reader
an easy to follow format where specified items are brought to the forefront immediately allowing
the reader to focus on these points separately.
Measures excluding specified items have no standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and are not
necessarily comparable to similar measures presented by other companies, and therefore should not
be considered in isolation. It is important for readers to understand that certain items may be
presented in different lines on the financial statements thereby leading to different measures for
different companies. We compensate for this limitation by clearly identifying all items included in
or excluded from our non-GAAP measures and explaining the items removed or added back to the most
comparable GAAP items. The following tables reconcile these measures excluding specified items to
their closest GAAP financial measures.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIFIED ITEMS Years ended December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) |
|
|
|
PROFIT (LOSS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT FROM |
|
|
FROM |
|
|
|
FROM |
|
|
LOSS FROM |
|
|
|
PROFIT FROM |
|
|
LOSS FROM |
|
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As per GAAP* |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specified items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of property, plant and
equipment (i) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Closure and restructuring costs (ii) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Unrealized mark-to-market gains
or losses (iii) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Foreign exchange gains or losses
on long-term debt (iv) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Income tax legislation changes (v) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal settlement (vi) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinancing costs (vii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of investments (viii) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries (ix) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duties (x) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Transaction costs (xi) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding specified items |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Except for operating profit (loss) from continuing operations, which is a non-GAAP measure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIFIED ITEMS Three months ended December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
EARNINGS |
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROFIT FROM |
|
|
(LOSS) FROM |
|
|
|
(LOSS) FROM |
|
|
LOSS FROM |
|
|
|
PROFIT (LOSS) FROM |
|
|
LOSS FROM |
|
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
CONTINUING |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As per GAAP* |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Specified items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of property, plant and
equipment (i) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Closure and restructuring costs (ii) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Unrealized mark-to-market gains
or losses (iii) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Foreign exchange gains or losses
on long-term debt (iv) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Income tax legislation changes (v) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal settlement (vi) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of investments (viii) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries (ix) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duties (x) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Transaction costs (xi) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding specified items |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Except for operating profit (loss) from continuing operations, which is a non-GAAP measure. |
(i) |
|
Our results reflect gains on sales of property, plant and equipment. These gains are
presented under Net gains on disposals of property, plant and equipment in the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(ii) |
|
Our results reflect closure and restructuring charges. These charges are presented under
Closure and restructuring costs in the consolidated financial statements. See Closure and
restructuring costs for further information. |
|
(iii) |
|
Our results include unrealized mark-to-market gains or losses on commodity swap contracts
and foreign exchange contracts not considered as hedges for accounting purposes. Such gains or
losses are presented under Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(iv) |
|
Our results include foreign exchange gains or losses on the translation of a portion of our
long-term debt. Such gains or losses are presented under Financing expenses in the
consolidated financial statements. |
|
(v) |
|
Our results include charges related to modifications to the income tax legislation. These
charges are presented under Income tax expense (recovery) in the consolidated financial
statements. |
|
(vi) |
|
Our results include charges (revenues) related to a legal settlement. These charges
(revenues) are presented under Selling, general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated financial statements. |
|
(vii) |
|
Our results include refinancing expenses. These refinancing expenses are presented under
Financing expenses in the consolidated financial statements. |
8
(viii) |
|
Our results include charges related to write downs of investments. These charges are
presented under Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial
statements. |
|
(ix) |
|
Our results include insurance recoveries. These recoveries are presented under Selling,
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(x) |
|
Our results include charges or revenues related to countervailing and antidumping duties.
These revenues are presented under Antidumping and countervailing duties refund and charges
are presented under Cost of sales in the consolidated financial statements. |
|
(xi) |
|
Our results include costs related to our pending transaction with Weyerhaeuser. These costs
are presented under Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
financial statements. |
2006 VS 2005 ANNUAL OVERVIEW
SALES OF $4 BILLION
Sales in 2006 amounted to $3,989 million, a decrease of $258 million or 6% from sales of $4,247
million in 2005. This decrease was mainly attributable to the permanent closure of the Cornwall and
Ottawa paper mills effective at the end of the first quarter of 2006 and the indefinite shut down
of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill for the entire year of 2006, the negative impact of a 7% rise
in the year over year average value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar (from $0.826
to $0.882) and lower average selling prices and shipments for wood products. These factors were
partially offset by higher average selling prices for all of our major products except for wood,
higher shipments for pulp and paper (excluding the impact of mills that were indefinitely and
permanently closed) and the settlement in July 2006 of a sales contract dispute that resulted in a
payment to us of $14 million.
OPERATING PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS OF $237 MILLION
Cost of sales decreased by $328 million or 9% in 2006 compared to 2005 mainly due to the permanent
closure of the Cornwall and Ottawa paper mills, effective at the end of the first quarter of 2006
and the indefinite shut down of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill. Other factors causing a decrease
in cost of sales included the positive impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on our U.S. dollar
denominated expenses, lower production and shipments for wood products, lower cash deposits for
countervailing and antidumping duties due to the decrease in duties rate and prices, the cessation
of duties collected by the U.S as of October 12, 2006, higher investment tax credits related to
research and development expenditures from prior years, lower costs for purchased wood fiber and
chemicals, as well as the realization of savings stemming from restructuring activities. These
factors were partially offset by higher shipments for pulp and paper, and higher energy and freight
costs (excluding the impact of mills that were indefinitely and permanently closed).
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased by $13 million or 6% in 2006
compared to 2005. SG&A in 2006 included transaction costs of
$25 million relating to our pending transaction with Weyerhaeusers fine paper business, unrealized mark-to-market losses on
financial instruments of $4 million and revenue of $7 million related to a legal settlement,
while SG&A in 2005 included unrealized mark-to-market gains of $5 million, a charge of $13 million
related to a legal settlement with regards to an investigation by the Canadian Competition Bureau
and insurance recoveries of $3 million. When excluding these items, SG&A decreased by $30 million
or 13% compared to 2005. This decrease was mainly attributable to the realization of savings
stemming from restructuring activities and the Ontario governments retroactive reduction in Crown
stumpage fees related to 2005 and 2006, partially offset by higher pension expenses.
Operating profit from continuing operations in 2006 amounted to $237 million compared to an
operating loss from continuing operations of $349 million in 2005. Excluding specified items,
operating profit from continuing operations totaled $139 million in 2006 compared to an operating
profit from continuing operations of $23 million in 2005. The $116 million increase in operating
profit from continuing operations excluding specified items was largely attributable to higher
average selling prices for all of our major products except for wood, higher shipments for pulp and
paper (excluding the impact of mills that were indefinitely and permanently closed), higher
investment tax credits related to research and development expenditures from prior years, the
settlement of a sales contract dispute, as well as the realization of savings stemming from
restructuring activities. These factors were partially offset by the negative impact of a stronger
Canadian dollar (including the effect of our hedging program), lower average selling prices and
shipments for wood products and higher energy and freight costs (excluding the impact of mills and
sawmills that were permanently or indefinitely closed).
9
|
|
|
|
|
VARIANCE ANALYSIS - 2006 VS 2005 |
|
|
|
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 operating profit from continuing operations, excluding specified items |
|
|
23 |
|
Selling prices |
|
|
142 |
|
Foreign exchange (net of hedging programs) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Shipments and mix |
|
|
1 |
|
Other costs, including savings from mill closures |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 operating profit from continuing operations, excluding specified items |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIFIC COST REDUCTION INITIATIVES
Since 2004, the Corporation has made an ongoing commitment to adjust production to meet its
customers needs, as well as maintain operational flexibility and a competitive manufacturing base.
These efforts have mainly impacted our Papers and Wood segments and have resulted in workforce
reductions throughout the organization.
In 2004, we announced several initiatives aimed at achieving a run-rate of $100 million in
annual cost reductions by the end of 2005. As at December 31, 2005, we had achieved our goal to
deliver $100 million of annualized savings stemming from these initiatives.
In November 2005, still faced with a number of economic conditions that adversely impacted our
business, such as higher energy prices and the rapid rise of the Canadian dollar, we announced a
series of additional targeted measures aimed at returning the Corporation to profitability. The
measures included the following initiatives:
|
|
|
The permanent closure of our Cornwall pulp and paper mill, effective at the end of the
first quarter of 2006, which eliminated approximately 910 permanent positions (including
the 390 positions already affected by the indefinite shut down of the pulp mill, paper
machine and sheeter announced in late 2004). This resulted in the permanent curtailment of
265,000 tons of uncoated and coated printing grades, as well as 145,000 tonnes of pulp
(including 85,000 tons of paper and 145,000 tonnes of pulp impacted by the indefinite shut
down announced in late 2004); |
|
|
|
|
The permanent closure of our Ottawa mill, effective at the end of the first quarter of
2006, which eliminated approximately 185 permanent positions and resulted in the permanent
curtailment of 65,000 tons of paper; |
|
|
|
|
The permanent closure of our Vancouver coated paper mill, effective at the end of the
second quarter of 2006, which eliminated approximately 285 permanent positions and resulted
in the permanent curtailment of 120,000 tons of coated paper; |
|
|
|
|
The permanent closure of our Grand-Remous and Malartic sawmills, effective in the second
quarter of 2006, which eliminated approximately 200 permanent positions; |
|
|
|
|
Further measures to reduce costs, as follows: |
|
o |
|
Reducing SG&A expenses by permanently eliminating approximately 100
corporate and divisional permanent positions, as well as other SG&A expenses; |
|
|
o |
|
Implementing further cost reductions at the mill level by eliminating approximately 200 operational positions; |
|
|
o |
|
Consolidating North American administrative offices in Montreal and Cincinnati. |
As at December 31, 2006, we had implemented all the announced measures.
10
CLOSURE AND RESTRUCTURING COSTS
Closure and restructuring costs for the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the fourth quarter
of 2005, as well as for the year 2006 compared to 2005, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs, net of reversals of provisions, related to the permanent closures of our Cornwall,
and Ottawa paper mills (severance, termination, environment and pension costs,
as well as $201 million for write-down of property, plant and equipment in 2005) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Costs related to the permanent closure of two sawmills at Malartic and
Grand-Remous (severance, termination, environment and pension costs,
as well as $23 million for the write-down of property, plant and equipment in 2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Costs related to specific cost reduction initiatives
(severance, termination, training and outplacement costs and other) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total closure and restructuring costs |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET EARNINGS OF $328 MILLION
Net earnings amounted to $328 million ($1.42 per common share) in 2006 compared to a net loss
of $388 million ($1.69 per common share) in 2005. Excluding specified items, loss from continuing
operations amounted to $7 million in 2006 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $51
million in 2005. This $44 million improvement was mainly attributable to the factors mentioned
above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
Cash flows provided from operating activities of continuing operations in 2006 amounted to $222
million compared to cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations of $41
million in 2005. Net additions to property, plant and equipment amounted to $91 million in 2006
compared to $129 million in 2005. We posted positive free cash flow1 of $131 million in
2006 compared to negative free cash flow of $170 million in 2005. This $301 million improvement
mainly reflects the refund of duties collected by the U.S Government since 2002 as well as improved
profitability, partially offset by working capital requirements due to the decrease in receivables
securitized in the amount of $140 million (US$120 million).
Our total long-term debt decreased by $368 million, due to the disposal of our 50% interest in
Norampac and the corresponding deconsolidation of its non-recourse debt, the debt repayments made
on our revolving credit facility resulting from the duties refund and better cash flow from
operations. Our net debt-to-total capitalization ratio2 as at December 31, 2006 stood at
40.2% compared to 57.7% as at December 31, 2005.
Q4 2006 VS Q4 2005 QUARTERLY OVERVIEW
SALES OF $939 MILLION
Sales in the fourth quarter of 2006 amounted to $939 million, a decrease of $51 million or 5%
from sales of $990 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. This decrease was attributable to the
permanent closures of the Cornwall and Ottawa paper mills effective at the end of the first quarter
of 2006, the indefinite shut down of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill, lower average selling
prices and shipments for wood products and the negative impact of a 3% rise in the quarter over
quarter average value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar (from $0.852 to $0.878).
These factors were partially offset by higher average selling prices for all of our major products
except wood, and higher shipments for pulp.
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Free Cash Flow table and definition in
the Liquidity & Capital Resources section. |
|
2 |
|
See Net debt-to-total capitalization ratio
table and definition in the Liquidity & Capital Resources section. |
11
OPERATING PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS OF $178 MILLION
Cost of sales decreased by $113 million or 13% in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the fourth
quarter of 2005. This decrease was mainly attributable to the permanent closures of the Cornwall
and Ottawa paper mills effective at the end of the first quarter of 2006, the indefinite shut down
of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill, lower cash deposits for countervailing and antidumping duties
due to the cessation of duties collected by the U.S. as of October 12, 2006, lower costs for
purchased wood fiber, chemicals, energy and freight, lower shipments of wood products, the positive
impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on our U.S. dollar denominated operating expenses and the
realization of savings stemming from restructuring activities. These factors were partially offset
by higher shipments for pulp.
SG&A expenses increased by $1 million or 1% in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to the
fourth quarter of 2005. SG&A in the fourth quarter of 2006 included transaction costs of $25
million relating to our pending transaction with Weyerhaeusers fine paper business and unrealized
mark-to-market losses on financial instruments of $3 million, while SG&A in the fourth quarter of
2005 included a charge of $13 million for a legal settlement with regards to an investigation by
the Canadian Competition Bureau. Excluding these items, SG&A decreased by $14 million or 24% in the
fourth quarter of 2006 compared to 2005. This decrease was mainly attributable to the realization
of savings stemming from restructuring activities.
Operating profit from continuing operations in the fourth quarter of 2006 amounted to $178
million, or $39 million when excluding specified items, compared to an operating loss from
continuing operations of $366 million, or $42 million when excluding specified items, for the
fourth quarter of 2005. The $81 million improvement in operating profit from continuing operations
excluding specified items was principally attributable to higher average selling prices for all of
our major products except for wood, lower costs for purchased wood fiber, chemicals, energy and
freight, higher shipments for pulp and the realization of savings stemming from restructuring
activities. These factors were partially offset by the negative impact of a stronger Canadian
dollar (including the effect of our hedging program) and lower average selling prices and shipments
for wood products.
NET EARNINGS OF $323 MILLION
Net earnings amounted to $323 million ($1.40 per common share) in the fourth quarter of 2006
compared to a net loss of $348 million ($1.51 per common share) in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Excluding specified items, loss from continuing operations amounted to $2 million in the fourth
quarter of 2006 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $46 million in the fourth quarter
of 2005. This $44 million improvement was mainly attributable to the factors mentioned above.
12
PAPERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED INFORMATION Years ended December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
Intersegment sales to Paper Merchants |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
Sales of property, plant and equipment1 |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Closure and restructuring costs1 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Unrealized mark-to-market gains or losses 1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Legal settlement 1 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations, excluding specified items |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper (in thousands of ST) |
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
Pulp (in thousands of ADMT) |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper shipments by product offering (%): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy and offset grades |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Uncoated commercial printing
& publication and premium imaging grades |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Coated commercial printing & publication grades |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Technical and specialty grades |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark prices2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy 20 lb sheets (US$/ton) |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Offset 50 lb rolls (US$/ton) |
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
Coated publication, no. 3, 60 lb rolls (US$/ton) |
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Pulp NBSK U.S. market (US$/ADMT) |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Pulp NBHK Japan market3 (US$/ADMT) |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Specified items affecting results and non-GAAP measures. |
|
2 |
|
Source: Pulp & Paper Week. As such, these prices do not necessarily
reflect our transaction prices. |
|
3 |
|
Based on Pulp and Paper Weeks Southern Bleached Hardwood Kraft pulp
prices for Japan, increased by an average differential of US$15/ADMT between Northern and
Southern Bleached Hardwood Kraft pulp prices. |
SALES AND OPERATING PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Sales in our Papers business amounted to $2,527 million in 2006, a decrease of $100 million or
4% from sales of $2,627 million in 2005. This decrease in sales was mainly attributable to the
closure of the Cornwall and Ottawa paper mills effective at the end of the first quarter of 2006,
the indefinite shut down of Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill and the negative impact of a 7% rise in
the year-over-year average value of the Canadian dollar. These factors were partially offset by
higher average selling prices of pulp and paper, the settlement of a sales contract dispute that
resulted in a payment to us of $14 million and higher shipments of pulp and paper (excluding the
impact of mills that were indefinitely and permanently closed).
13
Operating profit from continuing operations in our Papers business totaled $121 million in
2006 (or $140 million when excluding specified items) compared to an operating loss from continuing
operations of $329 million (or $51 million when excluding specified items) in 2005. Excluding
specified items, the $191 million improvement in operating profit from continuing operations is
largely the result of higher average selling prices for paper and pulp, the realization of savings
stemming from restructuring activities, the settlement of a sales contract dispute resulting in a
payment to Domtar of $14 million, higher shipments of pulp and paper (excluding the impact of mills
that were indefinitely and permanently closed), as well as recognition of investment tax credits
related to research and development expenditures from prior years. These factors were partially
offset by the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar and higher costs for purchased fiber,
chemicals and energy as well as freight.
PRICING ENVIRONMENT
In our Papers business, our average transaction prices, denominated in U.S. dollars, increased
in 2006 compared to 2005. Within our Canadian operations, although the rise of the Canadian dollar
negatively impacted our Canadian dollar denominated prices, which are derived from U.S. dollar
denominated prices, overall our average transaction prices denominated in Canadian dollars
increased in 2006 compared to 2005.
Our average transaction prices, denominated in U.S. dollars, for our basket of copy and offset
grades, increased on average by approximately 11% in 2006 compared to 2005. Within this basket, our
average transaction prices for copy 20 lb sheets and offset 50 lb rolls, which represented
approximately 35% of our paper sales in 2006, were higher on average by US$97/ton and US$100/ton,
respectively, in 2006 compared to 2005.
Our average transaction prices for Northern Bleached Softwood Kraft (NBSK) pulp increased by
US$38/tonne and our average transaction prices for Northern Bleached Hardwood Kraft (NBHK) pulp
increased by US$45/tonne in 2006 compared to 2005.
OPERATIONS
Shipments
Our paper shipments to capacity ratio was 96.0% in 2006 compared to 94.2% in 2005, largely as a
result of reduced capacity following the mill closures.
Our pulp shipments increased by 57,000 tons in 2006 compared to 2005 despite the indefinite
shut down of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill in November 2005. This increase in trade shipments
resulted from less internal use and more trade sales as a result of the permanent mill closures
mentioned above.
Labor
A collective agreement expired in April 2004 for our Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill (affecting
approximately 350 employees). Negotiations have ceased as the mill is closed for an indefinite
period.
In July 2006, a 5 year agreement, expiring April 30, 2010, was reached and ratified with the
union at the Windsor mill (affecting approximately 760 employees).
Restructuring
In November 2005, we announced the permanent shut down of our Cornwall pulp and paper mill as well
as our Ottawa paper mill, which became effective at the end of the first quarter of 2006. As a
result, the book value of these mills was reduced to their net recoverable value. We also announced
our intention to seek a buyer for our Vancouver paper mill. Our Vancouver paper mill was
permanently closed as at the end of the second quarter of 2006. In July 2006, we reached an
agreement to sell our Vancouver paper mill property for a total consideration of approximately $24
million, which represents its approximate net recoverable value. This agreement is subject to a
number of closing conditions and should be completed in the first half of 2007. In September 2006,
we sold our facility and land in Cornwall, for proceeds of $4 million and a corresponding gain of
$1 million ($1 million net of income taxes). These closures resulted in a reduction of our
production capacity of 145,000 tonnes of pulp and 450,000 tons of paper per annum and impacted
approximately 1,380 positions.
Other
In November 2005, we announced the indefinite shut down of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill due to
unfavorable economic conditions. As of December 31, 2006, economic factors such as increasing wood
fiber supply costs, energy and transportation costs, the strengthening of the Canadian dollar and
labor costs that are not competitive, did not allow us to reopen the pulp mill and operate
profitably. As a result, the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill was indefinitely idled rather than
permanently shut down. By the end of May 2006, we had to meet our obligations under
14
Quebec law with
respect to temporary lay-offs exceeding six months. These obligations resulted in severance
payments of approximately $7 million.
In July 2006, we settled a sales contract dispute that mutually resolved our differences,
resulting in a payment to Domtar of approximately $14 million (US$12 million) that was received in
July 2006.
In October 2006, we sold a parcel of timberlands for proceeds of $11 million (US$10 million)
and a corresponding gain of $10 million (US$9 million).
During the second quarter of 2005, we sold our facility and land in Senneville, Quebec, for
proceeds of $6 million and a corresponding gain of $4 million.
15
PAPER MERCHANTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED INFORMATION Years ended December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit from continuing operations |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Legal settlement1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit from continuing operations, excluding specified items |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Specified items affecting results and non-GAAP measures. |
SALES AND OPERATING PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Our Paper Merchants business generated sales of $1,051 million in 2006, an increase of $4
million compared to 2005. This increase was attributable to higher average selling prices and
higher shipments partially offset by the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar.
Operating profit from continuing operations amounted to $13 million in 2006 compared to $3
million in 2005. In 2005, the operating profit from continuing operations included a charge of $13
million related to a legal settlement with regards to an investigation by the Canadian Competition
Bureau relating to the sales of carbonless sheet paper in Ontario and Quebec during a one-year
period spanning part of 1999 and 2000. When excluding specified items, our operating profit from
continuing operations amounted to $13 million (reflecting an operating margin of 1.2%) in 2006
compared to $16 million (reflecting an operating margin of 1.5%) in 2005. The $3 million decrease
in operating profit from continuing operations excluding specified items was primarily due to a one
time bad debt expense and the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar, partially offset by
higher shipments.
16
WOOD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED INFORMATION Years ended December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lumber sales |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
Wood chips and other sales |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Intersegment sales |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Closure and restructuring costs 1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Legal settlement 1 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Insurance recoveries1 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write-down of investments1 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Duties1 |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations, excluding specified items |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments (millions of FBM) |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipments by product offering (%): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Random lengths |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Studs |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Value-added |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark prices2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lumber G.L. 2x4x8 stud (US$/MFBM) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Lumber G.L. 2x4 R/L no. 1 & no. 2 (US$/MFBM) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Specified items affecting results and non-GAAP measures. |
|
2 |
|
Source: Random Lengths. As such, these prices do not necessarily reflect our
transaction prices. |
SALES AND OPERATING PROFIT FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Sales in our Wood business amounted to $411 million in 2006, a decrease of $162 million or 28%
compared to sales of $573 million in 2005. This decrease was largely attributable to lower average
selling prices and lower shipments, mainly as a result of the permanent shut down of two sawmills
and the indefinite shut down of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill in addition to four other
sawmills, as well as the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar and the slowdown in the U.S.
housing industry.
Operating profit from continuing operations in our Wood business totaled $117 million in 2006
(or a loss from continuing operations of $28 million when excluding specified items) compared to an
operating loss from continuing operations of $33 million (or a profit from continuing operations of
$51 million when excluding specified items) in 2005. Excluding specified items, the $79 million
change in operating profit from continuing operations was mainly attributable to lower average
selling prices and shipments for lumber and chips as well as the negative impact of a stronger
Canadian dollar. These factors were partially mitigated by the realization of savings stemming from
restructuring activities, lower freight and energy costs, mostly due to the indefinite closure of
sawmills, and the $7 million refund received in the second quarter of 2006 as a result of the
Ontario governments retroactive reduction in Crown stumpage fees related to 2005 and 2006.
Cash deposits of $17 million were made on our softwood lumber exports to the U.S. in 2006
compared to $54 million in 2005. Since May 22, 2002, cash deposits for countervailing and
antidumping duties were made and expensed by Domtar. On April 27, 2006, the Canadian and U.S.
Governments signed a term sheet which addressed the refund of duty deposits and set out a framework
for the management of Canadian
17
softwood lumber exports to the U.S. for a seven-year period.
Specific implications of the Agreement included the immediate revocation by the U.S. of the
antidumping and countervailing duties orders, with retroactive effect to May 2002; the cessation of
countervailing and antidumping duties collections by the U.S.; the termination of ongoing
administrative reviews by the U.S.; the prohibition of any new antidumping or countervailing duties
investigations in respect of softwood lumber from Canada for the duration of the Agreement and the
immediate imposition by the Government of Canada of the export tax regime depending on the option
selected by the region. As a result, Domtar received a refund for duties collected by the U.S.
Government since 2002 and interest, amounting to $178 million plus interest of $22 million, during
the fourth quarter
of 2006. This refund was subject to a special charge of approximately 18% by the Canadian
Government. As at December 31, 2006, Domtar recorded a provision of $36 million relating to this
special charge, which was paid in January 2007.
PRICING ENVIRONMENT
Our average transaction price for Great Lakes 2x4 stud decreased by US$74/MFBM and our average
transaction price for Great Lakes 2x4 random length decreased by US$52/MFBM in 2006 compared to
2005.
OPERATIONS
In January 2007, due to the difficult market conditions that have prevailed in the wood sector
in recent months, including the slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the new softwood lumber
agreement, we announced the indefinite closure of our White River sawmill expected to be effective
in the second quarter of 2007. The closure will impact approximately 140 permanent positions.
In November 2005, due to reduced softwood fiber allocations, which have increased fiber costs
in Quebec, we announced the permanent closures of our Grand-Remous and Malartic sawmills, which
became effective in the second quarter of 2006. As a result, the book value of these sawmills was
reduced to their net recoverable value. These closures impacted approximately 200 permanent
positions. Subject to government approval, the wood fiber allocation for Grand-Remous and Malartic
will be transferred to Domtars other Quebec sawmills. This will ensure more efficient operations
by going to three shifts and will offer the possibility for approximately 80 employees from the
closed sawmills to obtain new positions created by an additional shift. We are currently working
with a partner, in collaboration with the Quebec government, on a value-added project to use the
Grand-Remous and Malartic infrastructures. In June 2006, we signed an agreement in principle with
TechCana related to the sale of certain assets located at those sawmills. This agreement was
originally scheduled for completion in the third quarter of 2006 and has been subsequently delayed
to the second quarter of 2007. This transaction is subject to the satisfaction of a number of
customary closing conditions.
In November 2005, the decision to temporarily shut down our Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill due
to unfavorable economic conditions caused us to indefinitely idle our adjacent sawmill. The
Lebel-sur-Quévillon sawmill restarted temporarily in the second quarter of 2006 in order to process
its roundwood inventory and shut down indefinitely again on October 11, 2006. Additionally, on
October 11, 2006, we announced the indefinite closures of three other sawmills (two in Abitibi,
Quebec, and one in Ontario). The closures, which occurred in October 2006, are primarily due to the
pressure of higher timber costs and lower demand for both lumber and wood chips. These closures
impacted approximately 360 permanent positions and reduced production capacity by approximately 400
million board feet of lumber.
In early 2005, we announced, in conjunction with Tembec Inc. (Tembec), the restructuring of
our northeastern Ontario sawmill operations, resulting in the permanent closure of our Chapleau
sawmill as of March 6, 2005. This measure impacted 67 permanent positions. This initiative arose
from a review of our northeastern Ontario sawmill operations in light of prevailing challenging
conditions. This initiative allowed us to add a third shift at our Elk Lake sawmill in April 2005
to process additional fiber resulting from the Chapleau closure and the resulting fiber swap with
Tembec.
Throughout 2005, certain of our operations were negatively impacted by several events and
market conditions. In early March 2005, a fire destroyed our planer at Elk Lake causing dressing
activities to be transferred primarily to our Chapleau mill facility until the planer was rebuilt
and put into operation in November 2005. Additionally, a forest fire in May 2005 negatively
impacted our operations and resulted in a loss of 25,000 cubic meters of cut wood and 30,000 acres
of forest. Higher wood fiber costs in Quebec and a reduction in harvest volumes further affected
our productivity.
We will continue examining opportunities to further improve the profitability of our Wood
business through additional cost reductions and strategic initiatives.
Fiber supply
The Province of Quebec adopted new legislation, which became effective April 1, 2005, that reduced
allowable wood-harvesting volumes by an average of 20% on public lands and 25% on territories
covered by an agreement between the Government of Quebec and Cree First Nations. As a
18
result, the
amount of fiber we were permitted to harvest annually, under our existing licenses from the Quebec
government, was reduced by approximately 500,000 cubic meters to approximately 2.0 million cubic
meters, reflecting a 21% reduction. Recently, the Chief forester of Quebec has proposed a further
reduction of 70,000 cubic meters, or 3%, in the total softwood annual allowable cut of forests
managed by Domtar. This would significantly affect the supply of fiber for our Northern Quebec
softwood sawmills and market pulp operations. Resulting from the closure in November 2005 of our
pulp mill at Lebel-sur-Quévillon due to unfavorable economic conditions and no alternative markets
for chips produced by our sawmills, as well as the reduced allowable wood harvesting volume, our
Northern Quebec softwood sawmills,
including Val dOr, Matagami and Lebel-sur-Quévillon, were closed for an indefinite period of time.
These sawmills closures represent a combined annual capacity of approximately 400 million board
feet of lumber.
We are currently working on finding solutions such as obtaining alternate sources of fiber.
The reduction in harvest volume has a corresponding increase in the unit cost of wood delivered to
the sawmills. If we are unable to maintain an adequate supply of fiber to mitigate the significant
cost increase and wood delivery cost, our Northern Quebec softwood sawmills and market pulp
operations may not reopen and may result in permanent closures or impairment of assets.
FINANCING EXPENSES AND
INCOME TAXES
FINANCING EXPENSES
In 2006, financing expenses amounted to $150 million compared to $144 million in 2005. In 2005,
our financing expenses included $7 million relating to early redemption expenses arising from the
refinancing of a portion of our long-term debt and $5 million relating to a foreign exchange gain
on the translation of a portion of our long term debt. Excluding those two items, the $8 million
increase in financing expenses was largely due to higher interest rates, which impacted interest
expense related to our revolving credit as well as our securitization program, partially offset by
the positive impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on our U.S. dollar interest expense.
INCOME TAXES
In 2006, our income tax expense totaled $24 million compared to an income tax recovery of $183
million in 2005. This variation is primarily due to the realization of earnings in 2006 compared to
losses in 2005. To a lesser extent, this variation results from a combination of other factors,
including a tax recovery adjustment of $2 million due to a decrease in statutory enacted income tax
rates, $10 million following the income tax reassessment of prior years by tax authorities, the mix
and level of earnings subject to different tax jurisdictions and differences in tax rates
applicable to our foreign subsidiaries.
19
BALANCE SHEET
Since Domtar sold its 50% interest in Norampac in December 2006, the 2006 balance sheet does
not contain information pertaining to Norampac, whereas the 2005 balance sheet does. In order to
achieve comparability, we provided below some of the 2005 balance sheet items excluding information
pertaining to our 50% interest in Norampac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
BALANCE SHEET ITEMS |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
exluding Norampac | |
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
3,254 |
|
Assets held for sales |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
Long-term debt (including the portion due within one year) |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
Other liabilities and deferred credits |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Our total consolidated assets were $4,955 million as at December 31, 2006 compared to $5,192
million, including Norampac, as at December 31, 2005. The following is a comparison of 2006 versus
2005 excluding Norampac. Receivables amounted to $305 million as at December 31, 2006, an increase
of $107 million when compared to $198 million as at December 31, 2005. This increase is mostly due
to reduced securitized receivables in the amount of $140 million and higher average selling prices,
partially offset by mill closures. Inventories as at December 31, 2006 totaled $575 million, a
decrease of $71 million when compared to $646 million as at December 31, 2005. This decrease is
mostly attributable to lower levels of raw materials (wood inventory) due to the impact of mill
closures. Property, plant and equipment as at December 31, 2006 amounted to $3,044 million compared
to $3,254 million as at December 31, 2005. This $210 million decrease was mainly attributable to a
greater level of amortization expense compared to capital expenditures. Other assets stood at $275
million as at December 31, 2006 compared to $292 million as at December 31, 2005. This $17 million
decrease was attributable to, among other things, impairment of an investment in the wood segment
and mark-to-market losses of our pulp swap financial instruments, partially offset by higher
funding of our pension assets compared to pension expense.
Trade and other payables stood at $533 million as at December 31, 2006, a decrease of $36
million compared to $569 million as at December 31, 2005. This decrease is mainly attributable to
the timing of payments and expenses in December 2006 versus December 2005, as well as mill
closures. Long-term debt (including the portion due within one year) stood at $1,891 million as at
December 31, 2006, a decrease of $162 million compared to $2,053 million as at December 31, 2005.
This decrease is mainly due to debt repayments made on our revolving credit facility. Future income
taxes stood at $285 million as at December 31, 2006, a $69 million increase compared to $216
million as at December 31, 2005. This increase is due to the utilization of prior years losses to
reduce the taxable income in 2006. Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments were
negative $202 million as at December 31, 2006 compared to negative $200 million as at December 31,
2005. This variation reflects the net impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on the net assets of our
self-sustaining U.S. subsidiaries, or $1 million, net of the impact of a stronger Canadian dollar
on the long-term debt designated as a hedge of the above-mentioned net assets, or $1 million, and
its corresponding income tax effect of $1 million.
20
LIQUIDITY AND
CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FREE CASH FLOW Years ended December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from operating activities of continuing operations
before changes in working capital and other items |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Changes in working capital and other items |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from (used for) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
Net additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
Free cash flow1 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that we define as the amount by which cash
flows provided from operating activities of continuing operations, as determined in accordance
with GAAP, exceeds net additions to property, plant and equipment, as determined in accordance
with GAAP (additions to property, plant and equipment net of proceeds from disposals of
property, plant and equipment). We use free cash flow in evaluating our ability and that of
our business segments to service our debt and pay dividends to our shareholders and, as such,
believe it would be useful for investors and other users to be aware of this measure so they
can better assess our performance. Our free cash flow measure has no standardized meaning
prescribed by GAAP and is not necessarily comparable to similar measures presented by other
companies and therefore should not be considered in isolation. |
Our principal cash requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures, as well as
principal and interest payments on our debt. We expect to fund our liquidity needs primarily with
internally generated funds from our operations and, to the extent necessary, through borrowings
under our revolving credit facility. We also have the ability to fund liquidity requirements
through new financings, subject to satisfactory market conditions and / or credit ratings.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows provided from operating activities of continuing operations totaled $222 million in
2006 compared to cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations of $41 million
in 2005. This $263 million improvement in cash flows generated from continuing operations mainly
reflects an increase in profitability, due in large part to the duties refund, as well as decreased
requirements for working capital. Change in working capital for 2006 includes an increase in
receivables due to a reduction of off balance sheet securitization in the amount of $140 million
(US$120 million). Our operating cash flow requirements are primarily for salaries and benefits, the
purchase of wood fiber, energy and raw materials and other expenses such as property taxes.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Cash flows provided from investing activities of continuing operations totaled $471 million in
2006 compared to cash flows used for investing activities of continuing operations of $132 million
in 2005. The $603 million improvement in cash flows provided from investing activities of
continuing operations was mainly attributable to the sale of our 50% interest in Norampac for which
we received a cash consideration of $560 million and to a lesser extent, fewer additions to
property, plant and equipment. We intend to limit our annual capital expenditures to below 75% of
amortization. Capital expenditures required to maintain existing operations are approximately $90
million annually.
Free cash flow in 2006 was $131 million compared to negative $170 million in 2005. This
improvement mainly reflects an increase in profitability offset by working capital requirements.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
In 2006, cash flows used for financing activities of continuing operations amounted to $115
million compared to cash flows provided from financing activities of continuing operations of $188
million in 2005. This $303 million increase in cash flows used for financing activities of
continuing operations is largely attributable to a repayment on our revolving credit facility
resulting from better cash flow from operations, which included the refund for duties collected by
the U.S. Government, lower borrowings and reduced dividend payments.
21
On October 27, 2005, as part of its plan to improve its free cash flow availability, Domtar
announced that it was suspending its $0.24 per common share dividend. This decision resulted in
annual cash savings of approximately $55 million, based on the $0.24 per common share dividend
Domtar had been paying at the time of the suspension.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DEBT-TO-TOTAL CAPITALIZATION
RATIO1 As at December 31 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Long-term debt (including portion due within one year) |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt-to-total capitalization (%) |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
|
57.7 |
% |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net debt-to-total capitalization ratio is a non-GAAP measure. We track this ratio
on a regular basis in order to assess our debt position. We therefore believe it would be
useful for investors and other users to be aware of this measure so they can better assess
our performance. Net debt-to-total capitalization ratio has no standardized meaning
prescribed by GAAP and is not necessarily comparable to similar measures presented by other
companies and therefore should not be considered in isolation. |
As at December 31, 2006, our net debt-to-total capitalization ratio was 40.2% compared to 57.7%
as at December 31, 2005. Net indebtedness was $1,304 million as at December 31, 2006 compared to
$2,197 million, including Norampac, as at December 31, 2005. The $893 million decrease in net
indebtedness was largely due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents resulting from the
proceeds on sale of our 50% interest in Norampac, the corresponding deconsolidation of our 50%
interest in Norampac and corresponding non-recourse debt as well as repayment on our revolving
credit facilities resulting from the refund of duties.
On March 3, 2005, Domtar entered into a new five-year unsecured revolving credit facility of
US$700 million. This amount was reduced to US$600 million pursuant to an amendment to this facility
in November 2005. This new facility replaced the prior credit facility, which consisted of a US$500
million unsecured revolving credit facility and a US$70 million unsecured term loan that was
scheduled to mature in July 2006.
Borrowings under this new unsecured revolving credit facility bear interest at a rate based on
the Canadian dollar bankers acceptance or U.S. dollar LIBOR rate, each with an added spread that
varies with our credit rating, or on the Canadian or U.S. prime rate. This credit facility also
requires commitment fees that vary with our credit rating.
In connection with the November 2005 amendment, Domtar made certain changes to its credit
facility, which matures in 2010, in order to improve financial flexibility. This amendment
contained certain financial covenants which require Domtar, on a rolling four quarter basis, to
maintain (a) a minimum EBITDA2 to interest ratio of 1.5 : 1.0 by the end of 2006,
increasing to 1.75 : 1.0 in 2007 and 2.5 : 1.0 at the beginning of 2008, excluding from the
calculation most of the charges related to our restructuring plans, and (b) a minimum
EBITDA2 of $225 million in 2006, increasing to $325 million in 2007, as calculated in
accordance with our credit facility which exclude from the calculation most of the charges related
to our restructuring plans. There is no minimum EBITDA2 requirement after 2007. Domtar,
on a quarterly basis, is required not to exceed a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio of
60%, excluding from the calculation most of the impact of the restructuring plans. The amendment
also included a reduction in the size of the facility from US$700 million to US$600 million, and
provided for guarantees by Domtars subsidiaries.
As at December 31, 2006, this credit facility had no drawings, US$16 million ($18 million) of
letters of credit outstanding and no amounts drawn in the form of bank overdraft and included in
Bank indebtedness, resulting in US$584 million ($681 million) of availability for future drawings
under this facility. As of December 31, 2005, we had drawings of US$137 million ($160 million),
US$18 million ($21 million) letters of credit outstanding, and US$13 million ($15 million) drawn in
the form of bank overdraft and included in Bank indebtedness.
As at December 31, 2006, we had a provision of $4 million related to these letters of credit
($4 million as at December 31, 2005).
In addition, as at December 31, 2006, separate letters of credit of $3 million were
outstanding. No provisions relating to these letters of credit were recorded.
Our borrowing agreements contain restrictive covenants. See the discussion above for covenants
related to our unsecured bank credit facility. The indentures related to the 10% and 10.85%
debentures limit the amount of dividends that may be paid and the amount of shares that may be
repurchased for cancellation. These indentures also require that no new long-term debt be incurred,
unless total long-term debt is less than 50% of consolidated net tangible assets, but do not
restrict the incurrence of new long- term debt related to the purchase of property or the
replacement
|
|
|
2 |
|
EBITDA as defined in the credit agreement. |
22
of existing long-term debt or the issuance of short-term debt. All our borrowing
agreements contain restrictions on the amount of secured borrowings we can incur with other
lenders.
|
|
|
|
|
CREDIT RATINGS |
|
|
|
|
RATING AGENCY |
|
SECURITY |
|
RATING |
Dominion Bond Rating Service
|
|
Unsecured Notes and Debentures
|
|
BB (low) |
|
|
Preferred Shares
|
|
P5 (high) |
Moodys Investors Services
|
|
Unsecured Notes and Debentures
|
|
B2 |
Standard & Poors
|
|
Unsecured Notes and Debentures
|
|
B+ |
The above ratings represent a risk assessment of our public unsecured debt securities. The rating
by Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS) is the fifth best rating in terms of quality within ten
rating gradations, with the low indicating a ranking in the lower end of this rating category.
The rating by Moodys Investors Services (Moodys) is the sixth best rating in terms of quality
within nine rating gradations, with the numerical modifier 2 indicating a ranking in the middle end
of this rating category. The rating by Standard & Poors (S&P) is the sixth best rating in terms of
quality within ten rating gradations, with the plus indicating a ranking at the higher end of
this category.
During the past year, our unsecured note rating with DBRS fell from BB (high) to BB (low) and
our unsecured note rating with Moodys fell from B1 to B2. These reductions in our credit ratings
impact our access to and cost of capital and financial flexibility. Further reductions in our
credit ratings would have an added negative impact on our financial flexibility. The above ratings
are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or
withdrawal at any time by the above rating agencies.
Common shares
In 2006, common shares amounting to $4 million were issued, net of expenses, pursuant to our stock
option and share purchase plans compared to $7 million in 2005.
As at January 31, 2007, we had 231,605,809 common shares, 67,476 Series A Preferred Shares and
1,230,000 Series B Preferred Shares issued and outstanding.
As at January 31, 2007, we had 4,321,757 common share purchase options issued and outstanding
under the Executive stock option and share purchase plan.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the normal course of business, we finance certain of our activities off balance sheet
through leases and securitizations.
LEASES
On an ongoing basis, we enter into operating leases for property, plant and equipment. Minimum
future rental payments under these operating leases, determined as at December 31, 2006, amounted
to $87 million.
SECURITIZATIONS
The Corporation sells its trade receivables through a securitization program which expires in
February 2009. The Corporation uses securitization of its receivables as a source of financing by
reducing its working capital requirements. This securitization consists of the sale of receivables,
or the sale of senior beneficial interest in them, to special purpose trusts managed by financial
institutions for multiple sellers of receivables. The agreement normally allows the daily sale of
new receivables to replace those that have been collected. It also limits the cash that can be
received from the sale of the senior beneficial interest. Such sales of receivables are contingent
upon annual renewals and retaining specified credit ratings. The subordinate interest retained by
the Corporation is included in Receivables and will be collected only after the senior beneficial
interest has been settled. The book value of the retained subordinated interests approximates fair
value.
As at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the senior beneficial interest in receivables
held by third parties amounted to $23 million and $163 million, respectively. The Corporation
expects to continue selling receivables on an ongoing basis, given the attractive discount rates.
23
Should this program be discontinued either by managements decision or due to termination of the
program by the provider, the Corporations working capital and bank debt requirements would
increase.
GUARANTEES
INDEMNIFICATIONS
In the normal course of business, the Corporation offers indemnifications relating to the sale
of its businesses and real estate. In general, these indemnifications may relate to claims from
past business operations, the failure to abide by covenants and the breach of representations and
warranties included in the sales agreements. Typically, such representations and warranties relate
to taxation, environmental, product and employee matters. The terms of these indemnification
agreements are generally for an unlimited period of time. As at December 31, 2006, the Corporation
is unable to estimate the potential maximum liabilities for these types of indemnification
guarantees as the amounts are contingent upon the outcome of future events, the nature and
likelihood of which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no provisions have
been recorded. These indemnifications have not yielded significant expenses in the past.
PENSION PLANS
We have indemnified and held harmless the trustees of Domtars pension funds, and the
respective officers, directors, employees and agents of such trustees, from any and all costs and
expenses arising out of the performance of their obligations under the relevant trust agreements,
including in respect of their reliance on authorized instructions of Domtar or for failing to act
in the absence of authorized instructions. These indemnifications survive the termination of such
agreements. As at December 31, 2006, we had not recorded a liability associated with these
indemnifications, as we do not expect to make any payments pertaining to these indemnifications.
E.B. EDDY ACQUISITION
On July 31, 1998, the Corporation acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of E.B.
Eddy Limited and E.B. Eddy Paper, Inc. (E.B. Eddy), an integrated producer of specialty paper and
wood products. The purchase agreement includes a purchase price adjustment whereby, in the event of
the acquisition by a third party of more than 50% of the shares of the Corporation in specified
circumstances, the Corporation may have had to pay up to a maximum of $120 million, an amount which
is gradually declining over a 25-year period. As at December 31, 2006, the maximum amount of the
purchase price adjustment was $110 million. No provision was recorded for this potential purchase
price adjustment.
DEBT AGREEMENTS
Certain debt agreements require the Corporation to indemnify the parties in the event of
changes in elements such as withholding tax regulations. As the nature and scope of such
indemnifications are contingent on future events, none of which can be foreseen as at December 31,
2006, and the structure of such transactions makes these events unlikely, no provisions have been
recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
24
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
In the normal course of business, we enter into certain contractual obligations and commercial
commitments. The following tables provide our obligations and commitments as at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRACT TYPE |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
THEREAFTER |
|
TOTAL |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
Other |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
Total obligations |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMERCIAL OBLIGATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENT TYPE |
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
THEREAFTER |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Other commercial
commitments* |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
Total commitments |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
includes commitments to purchase roundwood, wood, chips, gas, electricity and certain
chemicals. |
For 2007 and the foreseeable future, we expect cash flows from operations and from our various
sources of financing to be sufficient to meet our contractual obligations and commercial
commitments.
25
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Selected quarterly financial information for the eight most recently completed quarters ending
December 31, 2006 is disclosed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED QUARTERLY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
1st |
|
|
2nd |
|
|
3rd |
|
|
4th |
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
1st |
|
|
2nd |
|
|
3rd |
|
|
4th |
|
|
Year |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
4,247 |
|
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Excluding specified items 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Excluding specified items 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
per share (in dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
(1.18 |
) |
|
|
(1.36 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share (in dollars): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade shipments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papers (in thousands of ST) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
Market pulp (in thousands of ADST) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
Lumber (in millions of FBM) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark prices 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy 20 lb sheets |
|
(US$/ST) |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Offset 50 ln rolls |
|
(US$/ST) |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
Coated publication, no. 3, 60 lb rolls |
|
(US$/ST) |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
Pulp NBSK U.S. market |
|
(US$/ADMT) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Pulp NBHK
Japan market
3 |
|
(US$/ADMT) |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
Wood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lumber G.L. 2x4x8 studs |
|
(US$/MFBM) |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
Lumber G.L. 2x4 R/L, no.1 & no.2 |
|
(US$/MFBM) |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average exchange rates |
|
CAN$ |
|
|
1.227 |
|
|
|
1.244 |
|
|
|
1.202 |
|
|
|
1.173 |
|
|
|
1.211 |
|
|
|
|
1.155 |
|
|
|
1.122 |
|
|
|
1.121 |
|
|
|
1.139 |
|
|
|
1.134 |
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
0.815 |
|
|
|
0.804 |
|
|
|
0.832 |
|
|
|
0.852 |
|
|
|
0.826 |
|
|
|
|
0.866 |
|
|
|
0.891 |
|
|
|
0.892 |
|
|
|
0.878 |
|
|
|
0.882 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Specified items affecting results and non-GAAP measures.
|
|
2 |
|
Source: Pulp & Paper Week and Random Lengths. As such, these prices do not
necessarily reflect our transaction prices. |
|
3 |
|
Based on Pulp & Paper Weeks Southern Bleached Hardwood Kraft pulp prices for Japan,
increased by an average differential of US$15/ADMT between Northern and Southern Bleached
Hardwood Kraft pulp prices. |
The first quarter of 2005 reflected an improvement over the fourth quarter of 2004.
Selling prices for pulp and lumber remained strong, while selling prices for papers declined
marginally. Demand for our paper and wood products also remained strong. However, the indefinite
closure of our pulp mill in Cornwall and the wood shortage problems experienced at our Ashdown pulp
mill resulted in lower pulp shipments. Overall lower costs, partially resulting from the
realization of savings stemming from restructuring initiatives throughout our business segments and
productivity gains in our Wood business, further improved results in the first quarter of 2005. The
second quarter of 2005 mirrored the first quarter of the year and average selling prices for paper
and pulp increased. Volumes of pulp and wood products were higher although paper shipments
decreased. Meanwhile, our results continued to be negatively affected by the strengthening of the
Canadian dollar and high costs for
26
purchased chemicals, wood, energy and freight. These were
partially offset by the realization of savings stemming from restructuring initiatives. Results for
the third quarter of 2005, however, showed a marked deterioration. Despite higher shipments for
paper and pulp, average selling prices were lower for most of our major products and shipments for
wood products were lower as well. In addition, our results continued to be negatively affected by
the persistent strengthening of the Canadian dollar, as well as by higher costs for purchased
energy and freight. These were partially offset by the realization of savings stemming from
restructuring initiatives. Results for the fourth quarter of 2005 continued to
deteriorate. Shipments for products in the fourth quarter of 2005 were lower than in the third
quarter, mainly due to seasonally weaker demand. In addition, pulp shipments were affected by the
temporary closure of the Lebel-sur-Quévillon pulp mill in late November 2005. We also continued to
be negatively affected by the strengthening of the Canadian dollar, lower average selling prices
for our paper and wood products, and higher costs for purchased energy and freight.
The first quarter of 2006 reflected an improvement in all of our businesses over the fourth
quarter of 2005. Our results benefited from higher average selling prices for the majority of our
products and higher shipments for paper. Nonetheless, our results continued to be negatively
affected by the strengthening of the Canadian dollar and high costs, especially for freight and
energy. In light of this difficult context, we continued to carry out our announced closure and
restructuring initiatives, with the definite closures of our Cornwall and Ottawa mills effective at
the end of the first quarter of 2006. Results for the second quarter of 2006 continued to improve
for the majority of our businesses when compared to the first quarter of 2006. Although our
earnings were negatively impacted by lower shipment for pulp and paper, lower average selling price
for lumber and the continued strengthening of the Canadian dollar, we benefited from higher average
selling prices for pulp and paper, and the realization of savings stemming from our restructuring
initiatives. As of September 30, 2006, our Cornwall pulp and paper mill, Ottawa paper mill,
Vancouver paper mill and Grand-Remous and Malartic sawmills were permanently shut down. Results for
the third quarter of 2006 reflected an improvement in all of our businesses over the second
quarter, except for Wood. Our results benefited from higher average selling prices for the majority
of our products, except for Wood, higher shipments for pulp and higher investment tax credits
related to research and development expenditures from prior years. In July 2006, we settled a sales
contract dispute, resulting in a payment to us of $14 million. Overall lower costs, partially
resulting from the realization of savings stemming from restructuring initiatives throughout our
business segments further improved results in the third quarter of 2006. Results from continuing
operations for the fourth quarter of 2006 reflected an improvement over the preceding quarter, due
to the receipt of a $178 million refund plus interest of $22 million relating to lumber duties (net
of special charge of $36 million), the gain on the sale of timberlands that amounted to $10 million
($6 million net of taxes), higher selling prices for pulp and paper and lower freight and energy
costs. These were partially offset by lower shipments for all of our major products, lower average
selling prices for lumber, higher costs for purchased wood fibers and chemicals, offset by the
weakening of the Canadian dollar. The wood sector continued to face difficult industry conditions
including higher timber costs and lower demand for both lumber and wood chips. In addition, in the
fourth quarter of 2006, we sold our 50% interest in Norampac for a total cash consideration of $560
million, resulting in a gain of $237 million (net of applicable taxes) which is classified, as per
GAAP, as discontinued operations.
2005 COMPARED TO 2004
Sales in 2005 amounted to $4,247 million, a decrease of $156 million or 4% from sales of $4,403
million in 2004. This decrease was mainly attributable to the negative impact of a 7% rise in the
year-over-year average value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar (from $0.769 to
$0.826) and, to a lesser extent, to lower shipments for pulp and paper. These factors were
partially offset by higher average selling prices for all of our major products and higher
shipments for wood products.
Cost of sales decreased by $78 million or 2% in 2005 compared to 2004. This decrease was
mainly attributable to the positive impact of a stronger Canadian dollar on our U.S. dollar
denominated expenses, lower shipments for pulp and paper, the realization of savings stemming from
restructuring activities and lower duties on our softwood lumber exports to the U.S. These factors
were partially offset by higher costs for purchased wood fiber, chemicals, energy and freight, and
higher shipments for wood.
SG&A expenses decreased by $14 million or 6% in 2005 compared to 2004. SG&A in 2005 included
unrealized mark-to-market losses on financial instruments of $5 million, a charge of $13 million
related to a legal settlement with regards to an investigation by the Canadian Competition Bureau
and insurance recoveries of $3 million, while SG&A in 2004 included unrealized mark-to-market gains
of $3 million. When excluding these specified items, SG&A decreased by $27 million or 11% compared
to 2004. This decrease was mainly attributable to the realization of savings stemming from
restructuring activities.
Operating loss from continuing operations in 2005 amounted to $349 million compared to an
operating profit from continuing operations of $23 million in 2004. Excluding specified items,
operating profit from continuing operations totaled $23 million in 2005 compared to an operating
27
profit from continuing operations of $111 million in 2004. The $88 million decrease in operating
profit from continuing operations excluding specified items was largely attributable to the $121
million negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar (net of the positive effect of our hedging
program), higher costs for purchased wood fiber, chemicals, energy and freight, and lower shipments
for pulp and paper. These factors were partially offset by higher average selling prices for all of
our major products, the realization of savings stemming from restructuring activities and higher
shipments for wood products.
Net loss amounted to $388 million ($1.69 per common share) in 2005 compared to a net loss of
$42 million ($0.19 per common share) in 2004. Excluding specified items, loss from continuing
operations amounted to $51 million in 2005 compared to a loss from continuing operations of $4
million in 2004. The $47 million increase in loss from continuing operations, excluding specified
items, was mainly attributable to the factors mentioned above, partially offset by a higher income
tax recovery.
Cash flows used for operating activities of continuing operations in 2005 amounted to $41
million compared to cash flows provided from operating activities of continuing operations of $86
million in 2004. Net additions to property, plant and equipment amounted to $129 million in 2005
compared to $126 million in 2004. We posted negative free cash flow1 of $170 million in
2005 compared to negative free cash flow of $40 million in 2004. This $130 million deterioration
mainly reflects a decline in profitability, as well as increased requirements for working capital.
Our total long-term debt increased by $225 million, largely due to additional net borrowings
of $293 million, partially offset by the $68 million positive impact of a stronger Canadian dollar
(based on month-end foreign exchange rates) on our U.S. dollar denominated debt. Our net
debt-to-total capitalization ratio2 as at December 31, 2005 stood at 57.7% compared to
49.5% as at December 31, 2004.
ACCOUNTING CHANGE
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION FOR EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO RETIRE BEFORE THE VESTING DATE
In July 2006, the Emerging Issues Committee of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
(CICA) issued EIC 162, Stock-based Compensation for Employees Eligible to Retire before the
Vesting Date. EIC-162 clarifies the accounting for compensation costs relating to stock-based
awards granted to employees. EIC 162 requires that: i) compensation costs attributable to
stock-based awards granted to employees who are eligible to retire on the grant date be recognized
on the grant date; and ii) compensation cost attributable to stock-based awards granted to
employees who will become eligible to retire during the vesting period be recognized over the
period from the grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. This abstract is to be applied
retroactively, with restatement of prior periods, and is effective for the year ended December 31,
2006. The adoption of this guideline had no significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements under Canadian GAAP.
IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
NOT YET IMPLEMENTED
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
On July 1, 2006, the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) issued a replacement of Handbook Section
1506 Accounting Changes. The new standard allows for voluntary changes in accounting policy only
when they result in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information,
requires changes in accounting policy to be applied retrospectively unless doing so is
impracticable, requires prior period effects of changes in accounting policies, estimates and
errors on the financial statements. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2007, with earlier adoption encouraged. Domtar does not expect the adoption of
this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Free Cash Flow table and definition in
the Liquidity & Capital Resources section. |
|
2 |
|
See Net debt-to-total capitalization ratio
table and definition in the Liquidity & Capital Resources section. |
28
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In April 2005, the CICA issued three new Handbook Sections related to financial instruments:
Section 3855 Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement, Section 3865 Hedges and
Section 1530 Comprehensive Income. These Sections apply to fiscal years beginning on or after
October 1, 2006.
Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement
Section 3855 expands on Handbook Section 3860 Financial Instruments Disclosure and
Presentation, by prescribing when a financial instrument is to be recognized on the balance sheet
and at what amount. It also specifies how financial instrument gains and losses are to be
presented. Under this new Section:
- |
|
All financial assets and liabilities will be carried at fair value in
the consolidated balance sheet, except loans and receivables,
investments held-to-maturity and non-trading financial liabilities,
which will be carried at amortized cost. |
|
- |
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading financial assets
and liabilities will be recognized immediately in the consolidated
statement of income. |
|
- |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on financial assets that are available for
sale will be recognized in other comprehensive income until their
realization, after which these amounts will be recognized in the
consolidated statement of income. |
|
- |
|
All derivatives financial instruments will be carried at fair value in
the consolidated balance sheet, including those derivatives that are
embedded in other contracts but are not closely related to the host
contract. |
|
- |
|
Gains and losses on instruments designated as cash flow hedges are
recognized in other comprehensive income, except for the ineffective
portion of the hedges which will be recognized in net income. |
Hedges
Section 3865 provides alternative accounting treatments to those found in Section 3855 for entities
who choose to designate qualifying transactions as hedges for accounting purposes. It replaces and
expands on AcG-13 Hedging Relationships, and the hedging guidance in Section 1650 Foreign
Currency Translation by specifying how hedge accounting is applied and what disclosures are
necessary when it is applied. Under this new statement:
- |
|
In a fair value hedge, hedging derivatives are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in the
consolidated statement of income. The changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk will
also be recorded in consolidated income by way of a corresponding adjustment of the carrying amount of the hedged items
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
- |
|
In a cash flow hedge, the changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments will be recorded in other comprehensive
income. These amounts will be reclassified in the consolidated statement of income in the periods in which results are
affected by the cash flows of the hedged item. |
|
- |
|
Hedges of net investments in self-sustaining foreign operations are treated in a manner similar to cash flow hedges. |
|
- |
|
Any hedge ineffectiveness will be recorded in the consolidated statement of income. |
Comprehensive income
Section 1530 introduces a new requirement to present certain revenues, expenses, gains and losses,
that otherwise would not be immediately recorded in income, in a comprehensive income statement
with the same prominence as other statements that constitute a complete set of financial
statements.
Domtar is currently completing its evaluation of the impact that these accounting
pronouncements will have on its first quarter 2007 financial statements. Domtar expects the more
significant impacts of applying these new Sections to relate to:
- |
|
the requirement to present a new statement entitled Comprehensive income, |
|
- |
|
the recognition of the fair value of cash flow hedges on the balance sheet with the offset to other comprehensive income, |
|
- |
|
the reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments from Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments
to Other comprehensive income, |
|
- |
|
the reclassification of the deferred gains on the early settlement of interest rate swap contracts from Other liabilities
and deferred credits to Long-term debt, |
|
- |
|
the reclassification of unamortized debt issue costs and long-term debt discounts from Other asset to Long-term debt. |
29
As such, as at January 1, 2007, Domtar expects Other assets to decrease by approximately $26
million, Future income tax asset to increase by approximately $2 million, Other long-term
liabilities and deferred credits to decrease by $5 million, Long-term debt to decrease by $14
million, Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments to be nil and Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to be a loss of $207 million.
Financial instrument Disclosures and Presentation
In April 2005, the AcSB issued Handbook Section 3861 Financial instruments Disclosure and
presentation. This section establishes standards for presentation of financial instruments and
non-financial derivatives and identifies information that should be disclosed about them. This
section applies to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006. In December 2006, the AcSB
issued Handbook Section 3862 Financial instruments Disclosures and Handbook Section 3863
Financial instruments Presentation. These standards revise Section 3861. Under these new
sections, entities will be required to disclose information that enables users to evaluate the
significance of a financial instrument to an entitys financial position and performance. These
sections apply to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. Domtar does not expect the
initial adoption of these standards to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
CAPITAL DISCLOSURE
In December 2006, the AsCB issued Handbook Section 1535 Capital Disclosures, which
establishes guidelines for the disclosure of information regarding an entitys capital and how it
is managed. This standard requires disclosure of an entitys objectives, policies and processes for
managing capital, quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital and whether the entity
has complied with any capital requirements and, if it has not complied, the consequences of such
non-compliance. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements relating to
fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. Domtar does not expect the initial adoption of
this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect our results of operations and financial position. On an
ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates, including those related to environmental matters,
useful lives, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, pension and other employee future
benefit plans, income taxes and asset retirement obligations based upon currently available
information. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
These critical accounting policies reflect matters that contain a significant level of
management estimates about future events, reflect the most complex and subjective judgments, and
are subject to a fair degree of measurement uncertainty.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AND OTHER ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Environmental expenditures for effluent treatment, air emission, landfill operation and
closure, asbestos containment and removal, bark pile management, silvicultural activities and site
remediation (together referred to as environmental matters) are expensed or capitalized depending
on their future economic benefit. In the normal course of business, we incur certain operating
costs for environmental matters that are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for property, plant and
equipment that prevent future environmental impacts are capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over 10 to 40 years. Provisions for environmental matters are not discounted
and are recorded when remediation efforts are likely and can be reasonably determined.
We recognize asset retirement obligations at fair value in the period in which we incur a
legal obligation associated with the retirement of an asset. Our asset retirement obligations are
principally linked to landfill capping obligations, asbestos removal obligations and demolition of
certain abandoned buildings. Conditional asset retirement obligations
are recognized, at fair value, when the fair value of the liability
can be reasonably estimated. The associated costs are capitalized as part of the carrying value of
the related asset and depreciated over its remaining useful life. The liability is accreted using a
credit adjusted risk-free interest rate.
The estimate of fair value is based on the results of the expected future cash flow approach,
in which multiple cash flow scenarios that reflect a range of possible outcomes are considered. We
have established cash flow scenarios for each individual asset retirement obligation. Probabilities
are applied to each of the cash flow scenarios to arrive at an expected future cash flow. There is
no supplemental risk adjustment made to the expected cash flows. The expected cash flows for each
of the asset retirement obligations are discounted using the credit adjusted risk-free interest
rate for the corresponding period until the settlement date. The rates used vary, based on the
prevailing rate at the moment of recognition of the liability and on its settlement period. The
rates used vary between 4.50% and 9.40%.
30
Cash flow estimates incorporate either assumptions that marketplace participants would use in
their estimates of fair value, whenever that information is available without undue cost and
effort, or assumptions developed by internal experts.
While we believe that we have determined the costs for environmental matters likely to be
incurred, based on known information, our ongoing efforts to identify potential environmental
concerns that may be associated with our former and present operations may lead to future
environmental investigations. These efforts may result in the determination of additional
environmental costs and liabilities, which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
As at December 31, 2006, we had a provision of $54 million for environmental matters and other
asset retirement obligations. Additional costs, not known or identifiable, could be incurred for
remediation efforts. Based on policies and procedures in place to monitor environmental exposure,
we believe that such additional remediation costs would not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, earnings or cash flows.
In addition, the pulp and paper industry in the United States is subject to Boiler Maximum
Achievable Control Technology (M.A.C.T) Rules that further regulate air emissions. We believe we
comply with all present regulations and we anticipate spending approximately $4 million over the
next year to meet such requirements.
As at December 31, 2006, anticipated undiscounted payments in each of the next five years are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
THEREAFTER |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental provision and other
asset retirement obligations |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Boiler M.A.C.T Rules |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
In 2006, our operating expenses for environmental matters totaled $60 million and we
capitalized an additional $9 million for environmental projects mainly related to the improvement
of air emissions, effluent treatment and remedial actions taken to address environmental
compliance. In 2007, we expect to capitalize approximately $4 million for environmental projects,
including Boiler M.A.C.T Rules obligations. We are unable to estimate the total amount of capital
expenditures (other than Boiler M.A.C.T Rules obligations) that may be required beyond 2007 for
environmental compliance. However, we do not expect any additional required expenditure to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, earnings or cash flows.
USEFUL LIVES
Our property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated amortization, including
asset impairment write-down. Interest costs are capitalized for capital projects in excess of $10
million and having a duration in excess of one year. For timber limits and timberlands,
amortization is calculated using the unit of production method. For all other assets, amortization
is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
On a regular basis, we review the estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment.
Assessing the reasonableness of the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment
requires judgment and is based on currently available information. Changes in circumstances such as
technological advances, changes to our business strategy, changes to our capital strategy or
changes in regulation can result in the actual useful lives differing from our estimates. Revisions
to the estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment constitute a change in accounting
estimate and are dealt with prospectively by amending amortization rates. A change in the remaining
estimated useful life of a group of assets, or their estimated net salvage value, will affect the
amortization rate used to amortize the group of assets and thus affect amortization expense as
reported in our results of operations. A change of one year in the composite estimated useful life
of our fixed asset base would impact annual depreciation expense by approximately $15 million.
In 2006, we recorded total amortization expense of $284 million compared to $329 million in
2005 (or $554 million when including specified items pertaining to write-downs in the value of
property, plant and equipment as a result of closures). As at December 31, 2006, we had property,
plant and equipment with a net book value of $3,044 million ($3,634 million in 2005).
31
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
We review the carrying amount of long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable through future operations.
This is accomplished by determining whether projected undiscounted future cash flows from
operations exceed the net carrying amount of the assets as of the assessment date (Step I test).
Impaired assets are recorded at fair value, determined principally by using discounted future cash
flows expected from their use and eventual disposition (Step II test). Estimates of future cash
flows and fair value require judgment and may change over time.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we conducted Step I of the impairment tests on most of our
Canadian Pulp and Paper manufacturing facilities and the Wood segment.
Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset included
key assumptions related to trend prices, the 10 to 15 years forecasted exchange rate for the U.S.
dollar and the estimated useful life of the long-lived assets.
The trend prices were based on an analysis of external price trends, including Resource
Information Systems, Inc. (RISI), as well as normalized pulp, paper and wood pricing over a
business cycle at the mills subjected to the impairment tests.
The forecasted Canadian-U.S. foreign exchange rate assumptions were based on independent
market information, as well as analysis of historical data, trends and cycles. Management expects
the 10 to 15 years average rate to be approximately CAN$1.00 = US$0.75.
Domtar concluded that the recognition of an impairment loss for the business units analyzed
was not required.
Given the inherent imprecision and corresponding importance of the key assumptions used in the
impairment test, it is reasonably possible that changes in future conditions may lead management to
use different key assumptions, which could require a material change in the net carrying amount of
the assets tested for impairment. The total net carrying amount of these assets was $873 million as
at December 31, 2006.
GOODWILL
Goodwill is not amortized and is subject to an annual impairment test, or more frequently if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. Testing for impairment is
accomplished mainly by determining whether the fair value of a segment, based upon discounted cash
flows, exceeds the net carrying amount of that segment as of the assessment date. If the fair value
is greater than the net carrying amount, no impairment is necessary. In the event that the net
carrying amount exceeds the sum of the discounted cash flows, a second test must be performed
whereby the fair value of the segments goodwill must be estimated to determine if it is less than
its net carrying amount. Fair value of goodwill is estimated in the same way as goodwill was
determined at the date of the acquisition in a business combination, that is, the excess of the
fair value of the segment over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the segment.
PENSION AND OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS
Domtar contributes to several defined contribution, multi-employer and 401(k) plans. The
pension expense under these plans is equal to Domtars contribution. The 2006 pension expense was
$15 million ($17 million in 2005) ($4 million related to discontinued operations ($4 million in
2005)).
Domtar also has several defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all employees,
including one closed plan for certain non-unionized employees in Canada. Non-unionized employees in
Canada joining Domtar after June 1, 2000 participate in defined contribution plans. The defined
benefit plans are generally contributory in Canada and non-contributory in the United States. The
pension expense and the obligation related to the defined benefit plans are actuarially determined
using managements most probable assumptions.
In 2006, pursuant to the decision in November 2005 to close the Cornwall and Ottawa paper
mills, the Corporation declared a partial wind-up of the non-unionized and unionized plans related
to the Ontario participants in the plan.
We account for pension and other employee future benefits in accordance with CICA
recommendations. As such, assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and
performance of plan assets. Deferred recognition of differences between actual results and those
assumed is a guiding principle of these recommendations. This approach allows for a gradual
recognition of changes in benefit obligations and plan performance over the expected average
remaining service life of the active employee group covered by the plans.
Pension and other employee future benefit assumptions include the discount rate, the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets, the rate of compensation increase, health care cost trend
rates, mortality rates, employee early retirements and terminations or disabilities. Changes in
these assumptions result in actuarial gains or losses which, in accordance with CICA
recommendations, we have elected to amortize over the expected average remaining service life of
the active employee group covered by the plans only to the extent that the unrecognized net
actuarial gains and losses are in excess of 10% of the greater of the accrued benefit obligation
and the market-related value of plan assets as at the beginning of the year.
32
An expected rate of return on plan assets of 6.2% was considered appropriate by our management
for the determination of 2006 pension expense. Effective January 1, 2007, Domtar will use 6.3% as
the expected return on plan assets, which reflects the current view of long-term investment
returns.
The expected return on plan assets assumption for Domtar is based on an analysis of the target
asset allocation and expected return by asset class. This rate is adjusted for an equity risk
premium and by 0.5% to take into consideration the active investment management of the plan assets.
We set our discount rate assumption annually to reflect the rates available on high-quality,
fixed income debt instruments, with a duration that is expected to match the timing and amount of
expected benefit payments. High-quality debt instruments are corporate bonds with a rating of AA or
better. The discount rates as at December 31, 2006 for pension plans were estimated at 5.2% for the
accrued benefit obligation and 5.1% for the net periodic benefit cost for 2006 and other employee
future benefit plans were estimated at 5.2% for the accrued benefit obligation and 5.2% for the net
periodic benefit cost for 2006.
The rate of compensation increase is another significant assumption in the actuarial model for
pension (set at 2.7% for the accrued benefit obligation and 2.7% for the net periodic benefit cost)
and for other employee future benefits (set at 2.9% for the accrued benefit obligation and 3.3% for
the net periodic benefit cost) and is determined based upon our long-term plans for such increases.
For measurement purposes, 6.0% weighted-average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost
of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2007. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to
3.7% by 2012 and remain at that level thereafter.
The net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit plans as at December 31, 2006, increased by
$1.8 million, related to the impact of the negotiated collective agreement between Domtar Inc. and
the syndicat des travailleurs des pâtes et papiers de Windsor Inc. (CSN), and increased by $3.9
million related to the impact of the workforce reduction and restructuring plan announced in
November 2005 and in the Fall 2006.
The following table provides a sensitivity analysis of the key weighted average economic
assumptions used in measuring the accrued pension benefit obligation, the accrued other employee
future benefit obligation and related net periodic benefit cost for 2006. The sensitivity analysis
should be used with caution as it is hypothetical and changes in each key assumption may not be
linear. The sensitivities in each key variable have been calculated independently of each other.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PENSION AND OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFITS |
|
PENSION |
|
|
OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFITS |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCRUED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BENEFIT |
|
|
NET PERIODIC |
|
|
BENEFIT |
|
|
NET PERIODIC |
|
|
|
OBLIGATION |
|
|
BENEFIT COST |
|
|
OBLIGATION |
|
|
BENEFIT COST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected rate of return on assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% increase |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
1% decrease |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% increase |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1% decrease |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed overall health care cost trend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% increase |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1% decrease |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
The assets of the pension plans are held by a number of independent trustees and are accounted for
separately in our pension funds. The investment strategy for the assets in the pension plans is to
maintain a diversified portfolio of assets, invested in a prudent manner to maintain the security
of funds while maximizing returns within the guidelines provided in the investment policy. The
Corporations pension funds are not permitted to own any of Domtars shares or debt instruments.
The target asset allocation is based on the expected duration of the benefit obligation, which
includes the impact of a partial wind-up related to the mill closures.
33
The following table shows the allocation of the plan assets, based on the fair value of the assets
held at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the target allocation for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOCATION OF PLAN ASSETS as at December 31 |
|
TARGET ALLOCATION |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(in %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
securities |
|
|
58%-68 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
32%-42 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our funding policy is to contribute annually the amount required to provide for benefits earned in
the year and to fund past service obligations over periods not exceeding those permitted by the
applicable regulatory authorities. Past service obligations primarily arise from improvements to
plan benefits. The latest actuarial valuations were conducted as at March 31, 2006, for plans
representing approximately 74%, December 31, 2005, for plans representing approximately 20%,
January 1, 2006, for plans representing approximately 5% and January 1, 2004, for plans
representing 1% of the total plans asset fair value. These valuations indicated a funding
deficiency. The next actuarial valuations will be completed between December 31, 2006 and January
1, 2009. Domtar expects to contribute to the pension plans for a total amount of $88 million in
2007 compared to $86 million in 2006. The contributions made in 2006 to the other employee future
benefit plans amounted to $7 million.
The estimated future benefit payments from the plans for the next 10 years as at December
31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE |
|
ESTIMATED FUTURE BENEFIT PAYMENTS FROM THE PLANS |
|
PENSION |
|
|
FUTURE BENEFITS |
|
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2008 (1) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
2009 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2010 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
2011 |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
2012-2015 |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes estimated future benefit payments from the plans of $239 million
related to the partial wind-up of the non-unionized and unionized plans related to the Ontario
participants in the plan in 2006. |
INCOME TAXES
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, future
tax assets and liabilities are determined according to differences between the carrying amounts and
tax bases of the assets and liabilities. The change in the net future tax asset or liability is
included in earnings and in the Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments account in
Shareholders equity. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or
substantively enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply in the years in which assets and
liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. For these years, a projection of taxable
income and an assumption of the ultimate recovery or settlement period for temporary differences
are required. The projection of future taxable income is based on managements best estimate and
may vary from actual taxable income.
On an annual basis, we assess the need to establish a valuation allowance for future tax
assets and, if it is deemed more likely than not that our future tax assets will not be realized
based on these taxable income projections, a valuation allowance is recorded. As at December 31,
2006, we expect that our future tax assets will not be fully recovered from future taxable income,
and we have therefore set up a valuation allowance of $4 million.
Our future tax assets are mainly composed of temporary differences related to accounting
provisions for acquisitions, restructuring, environmental matters, as well as loss carry forwards.
The majority of these accruals will be utilized or paid out over the next five years. Our future
tax liabilities are mainly composed of temporary differences pertaining to plant, equipment and
others. Estimating the ultimate settlement period, given the amortization rates in effect are based
on information as it develops, requires judgment and our best estimates. The reversal of timing
differences is expected at future substantially enacted tax rates, which could change due to
changes in income tax laws or the introduction
34
of tax changes through the presentation of annual
budgets by different governments. As a result, a change in the timing and the income tax rate at
which the components will reverse could materially affect future tax expense as recorded in our
results of operations. A one percentage point change in our reported effective income tax rate
would have the effect of changing the income tax expense by approximately $7 million.
In addition, Canadian, American and international tax rules and regulations are subject to
interpretation and require judgment that may be challenged by taxation authorities. To the best of
our knowledge, we have adequately provided for our future tax consequences based upon current facts
and circumstances and current tax law.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded a total net tax expense of $24 million
(recovery of $183 million in 2005), of which $25 million was for future income tax expense
(recovery of $193 million in 2005). Our net future tax liability as at December 31, 2006 was $238
million ($242 million in 2005).
CLOSURE AND RESTRUCTURING COSTS
In recent years, Domtar has committed to several closures and restructuring initiatives, the
most significant of which is the series of targeted measures announced on November 30, 2005. The
impact of these measures is presented in Closure and restructuring costs in the income statement
and the related liability is included in Trade and other payables and in Other liabilities and
deferred credits. In general, closure and restructuring costs are recognized as liabilities in the
period when they are incurred and are measured at their fair value. For such recognition to occur,
management, with the appropriate level of authority, must have approved and committed to a firm
plan and appropriate communication to those affected must have occurred. These provisions require
an estimation of costs such as severance and termination benefits, pension and curtailments and
environmental remediation, and an evaluation of the fair value of the working capital and property,
plant and equipment is required to determine the required write-offs. The closure and restructuring
expense also includes costs relating to demolition, contractual obligations, training and
outplacement. As at December 31, 2006, Domtar had closure and restructuring charges of $35 million
($317 million in 2005) and a liability of $27 million ($26 million of liability from continuing
operations).
Estimates of cash flows and fair value relating to closures and restructurings require
judgment. Closure and restructuring costs are based on managements best estimates of future events
at December 31, 2006. Closure costs and restructuring estimates are dependent on future events.
Although we do not anticipate significant changes, the actual costs may differ from these estimates
due to subsequent developments such as the results of environmental studies, the ability to find a
buyer for assets set to be dismantled and demolished and other business developments. As such,
additional costs and further working capital and property, plant and equipment write-downs may be
required in future periods. Further costs related to the plans expected to be incurred over 2007
and thereafter are not significant.
35
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we may face. Additional risks
and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair
our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial
condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
The pulp, paper and wood product industries are highly cyclical. Fluctuations in the prices of
and the demand for our products could result in smaller profit margins and lower sales volumes.
The pulp, paper and wood product industries are highly cyclical. Historically, economic and market
shifts, fluctuations in capacity and changes in foreign currency exchange rates have created
cyclical changes in prices, sales volume and margins for our products. The length and magnitude of
industry cycles have varied over time and by product, but generally reflect changes in
macroeconomic conditions and levels of industry capacity. Most of our paper products are
commodities that are widely available from other producers. Even our non-commodity products, such
as value-added papers, are susceptible to commodity dynamics. Because commodity products have few
distinguishing qualities from producer to producer, competition for these products is based
primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand.
The overall levels of demand for the products we manufacture and distribute, and consequently
our sales and profitability, reflect fluctuations in levels of end-user demand, which depend in
part on general macroeconomic conditions in North America and worldwide, as well as competition
from electronic substitution. See Some of our products are vulnerable to long-term declines in
demand due to competing technologies or materials. For example, demand for cut-size office paper
may fluctuate with levels of white-collar employment. Demand for many of such products was
materially and negatively impacted by the global economic downturn, among other things, in the
early part of this decade, and we expect that we will be sensitive to such downturns in the future.
Industry supply of pulp, paper and wood products is also subject to fluctuation, as changing
industry conditions can influence producers to idle or permanently close individual machines or
entire mills. In addition, to avoid substantial cash costs in connection with idling or closing a
mill, some producers will choose to continue to operate at a loss, sometimes even a cash loss,
which could prolong weak pricing environments due to oversupply. Oversupply can also result from
producers introducing new capacity in response to favorable short-term pricing trends.
Industry supply of pulp, paper and wood products is also influenced by overseas production
capacity, which has grown in recent years and is expected to continue to grow. While the weakness
of the U.S. dollar has mitigated the levels of imports in recent years, imports of pulp, paper and
wood products from overseas may increase putting downward pressure on prices.
As a result, prices for all of our products are driven by many factors outside of our control,
and we will have little influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which are often
volatile. Because market conditions beyond our control determine the prices for our commodity
products, the price for any one or more of these products may fall below our cash production costs,
requiring us to either incur cash losses on product sales or cease production at one or more of our
manufacturing facilities. Therefore, our profitability with respect to these products depends on
managing our cost structure, particularly cost of wood fiber, chemical and energy, which represent
the largest components of our operating costs and can fluctuate based upon factors beyond our
control, as described below. If the prices of or demand for our products decline, or if our wood
fiber, chemical or energy costs increase, or both, our sales and profitability could be materially
and adversely affected.
Some of our products are vulnerable to long-term declines in demand due to competing
technologies or materials.
Our business competes with electronic transmission and document storage alternatives, as well as
with paper grades we do not produce, such as uncoated groundwood. As a result of such competition,
we have experienced decreased demand for some of our existing pulp and paper products. As the use
of these alternatives grows, demand for pulp and paper products is likely to further decline or
shift to other paper grades. Moreover, demand for some of our wood products may decline if
customers purchase alternatives from other sources.
We face intense competition in our markets, and our failure to compete effectively would have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We compete with both Canadian and U.S. producers in all of our product lines and with global
producers in certain of our product lines, some of which may have greater financial resources and
lower production costs in comparison to us. The principal basis for competition is selling price.
Our ability to maintain satisfactory margins depends in large part on our ability to control our
costs. There can be no assurance that we will be
36
able to compete effectively and maintain current levels of sales and profitability. If we are
unable to compete effectively, such failure would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Our manufacturing businesses may have difficulty obtaining wood fiber at favorable prices, or
at all.
Wood fiber is our principal raw material, comprising approximately 30% of the aggregate amount of
materials, labour and other operating expenses and fiber costs for our business during 2006. Wood
fiber is a commodity, and prices historically have been cyclical. The primary source for wood fiber
is timber. Environmental litigation and regulatory developments have caused, and may cause in the
future, significant reductions in the amount of timber available for commercial harvest in Canada
and the U.S. In addition, future domestic or foreign legislation and litigation concerning the use
of timberlands, the protection of endangered species, the promotion of forest health and the
response to and prevention of catastrophic wildfires could also affect timber supplies.
Availability of harvested timber may further be limited by fire, insect infestation, disease, ice
storms, wind storms, flooding and other natural and man made causes, thereby reducing supply and
increasing prices. Wood fiber pricing is subject to regional market influences, and our cost of
wood fiber may increase in particular regions due to market shifts in those regions. Any sustained
increase in wood fiber prices would increase our operating costs, and we may be unable to increase
prices for our products in response to increased wood fiber costs due to additional factors
affecting the demand or supply of these products.
The Province of Quebec adopted legislation, which became effective April 1, 2005, that reduced
allowable wood-harvesting volumes by an average of 20% on public lands and 25% on territories
covered by an agreement between the Government of Quebec and the Cree First Nations. As a result,
the amount of wood fiber, primarily softwood fiber, we are permitted to harvest annually, under our
existing licenses from the Quebec government, was reduced by approximately 500,000 cubic meters to
approximately 2.0 million cubic meters, reflecting a 21% reduction. Recently, the Chief forester of
Quebec has proposed a further reduction of 70,000 cubic meters, or 3%, in the total softwood annual
allowable cut of forests managed by Domtar. This would significantly affect the supply of fiber for
our Northern Quebec softwood sawmills and market pulp operations. We are currently working on
finding solutions such as obtaining alternate sources of fiber. The reduction in harvest volume has
a corresponding increase in the unit cost of wood delivered to the sawmills. As a result of the
impact of the strength in the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar, low lumber
prices and other factors, these operations have been shut down and the facilities relating to such
operations have been closed indefinitely. There is no assurance that access to wood fiber will
continue at the same levels achieved in the past. The cost of hardwood and softwood fiber and the
availability of wood chips may be affected.
An increase in our cost of purchased energy or chemicals would lead to higher manufacturing
costs, thereby reducing our margins.
Our operations consume substantial amounts of energy such as electricity, natural gas, fuel oil,
coal and hog fuel (wood waste). Energy comprised approximately 10% of our aggregate amount of
materials, labour and other operating expenses and fiber costs during 2006. Energy prices,
particularly for electricity, natural gas and fuel oil, have been volatile in recent years and
currently exceed historical averages. As a result, fluctuations in energy prices will impact our
manufacturing costs and contribute to earnings volatility.
Other raw materials we use include various chemical compounds, such as precipitated calcium
carbonate, sodium chlorate and sodium hydroxide, dyes, resins and adhesives. Purchases of chemicals
comprised approximately 15% of the aggregate amount our materials, labour and other operating costs
and fiber costs during 2006. The costs of these chemicals have been volatile historically, and are
influenced by capacity utilization, energy prices and other factors beyond our control.
For our commodity products, the relationship between industry supply and demand for these
products, rather than changes in the cost of raw materials, will determine our ability to increase
prices. Consequently, we may be unable to pass increases in our operating costs to our customers.
Any sustained increase in chemical or energy prices without any corresponding increase in product
pricing would reduce our operating margins and potentially require us to limit or cease operations
of one or more of our machines.
We could experience disruptions in operations and/or increased labour costs due to labour
disputes.
We are currently in the process of renegotiating certain collective bargaining agreements. As is
the case with any negotiation, we may not be able to negotiate acceptable new collective bargaining
agreements, which could result in strikes or work stoppages by affected workers. Renewal of
collective bargaining agreements could also result in higher wages or benefits paid to union
members. Therefore, we could experience a disruption of our operations or higher ongoing labour
costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results and financial
condition.
37
We rely heavily on a small number of significant customers. A loss of any significant
customers could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
A significant reduction in sales to any of our significant customers (which could be due to factors
outside our control, such as purchasing diversification) or financial difficulties experienced by
these customers could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
A material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting
customer demand, reduce our sales and/or negatively impact our net income.
Any of our paper or pulp manufacturing facilities, or any of our machines within an otherwise
operational facility, could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including:
|
|
|
unscheduled maintenance outages; |
|
|
|
|
prolonged power failures; |
|
|
|
|
an equipment failure; |
|
|
|
|
a chemical spill or release; |
|
|
|
|
explosion of a boiler; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of a drought or reduced rainfall on our water supply; |
|
|
|
|
labour difficulties; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, including roads, bridges, railroad tracks and tunnels; |
|
|
|
|
fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes or other catastrophes; |
|
|
|
|
terrorism or threats of terrorism; or |
|
|
|
|
other operational problems. |
Events such as those listed above may result in downtime and/or cause damage to our
facilities. Any such downtime or facility damage could prevent us from meeting customer demand for
our products and/or require us to make unplanned capital expenditures. If one of these machines or
facilities were to incur significant downtime, our ability to meet our production targets and
satisfy customer requirements would be impaired, resulting in lower sales and income.
Our operations require substantial capital, and we may not have adequate capital resources to
provide for all of our capital requirements. We spent approximately $108 million on capital
expenditures during 2006, and such expenditures could increase in the future.
Our businesses are capital intensive and require that we regularly incur capital expenditures
in order to maintain our equipment, increase our operating efficiency and comply with environmental
laws. Our total capital expenditures were approximately $108 million during 2006, including
approximately $68 million for maintenance capital and approximately $9 million for environmental
expenditures. We spent approximately $139 million on capital expenditures during 2005, including
approximately $71 million for maintenance capital and approximately $17 million for environmental
expenditures. If our available cash resources and cash generated from operations are not sufficient
to fund our operating needs and capital expenditures, we would have to obtain additional funds from
borrowings or other available sources or reduce or delay our capital expenditures. We may not be
able to obtain additional funds on favorable terms, or at all. In addition, our debt service
obligations will reduce our available cash flows. If we cannot maintain or upgrade our equipment as
we require or ensure environmental compliance, we could be required to cease or curtail some of our
manufacturing operations, or we may become unable to manufacture products that compete effectively
in one or more of our product lines
We could incur substantial costs as a result of compliance with, violations of or liabilities
under applicable environmental laws and regulations. We incurred approximately $60 million in
connection with environmental compliance and remediation during 2006, and such costs could increase
in the future.
We are subject, in both Canada and the U.S., to a wide range of general and industry-specific laws
and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing air
emissions, wastewater discharges, harvesting, silvicultural activities, the storage, management and
38
disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, landfill operation
and closure obligations, forestry operations and endangered species habitat, and health and safety
matters.
In
particular, the pulp and paper industry in the U.S. is subject to
Boiler M.A.C.T. Rules that further regulate effluent and air emissions. These laws and
regulations require us to obtain authorizations from and comply with the authorization requirements
of the appropriate governmental authorities, which have considerable discretion over the terms and
timing of permits.
We have incurred, and we expect that we will continue to incur, significant capital, operating
and other expenditures complying with applicable environmental laws and regulations and as a result
of remedial obligations. We incurred $60 million in connection with environmental compliance and
remediation during 2006. As of December 31, 2006, we had a provision of $54 million for these
environmental expenditures.
We also could incur substantial costs, such as civil or criminal fines, sanctions and
enforcement actions (including orders limiting our operations or requiring corrective measures,
installation of pollution control equipment or other remedial actions), cleanup and closure costs,
and third-party claims for property damage and personal injury as a result of violations of, or
liabilities under, environmental laws and regulations.
As the owner and operator of real estate, we may be liable under environmental laws for
cleanup, closure and other damages resulting from the presence and release of hazardous substances,
including asbestos, on or from our properties or operations. The amount and timing of environmental
expenditures is difficult to predict, and, in some cases, our liability may exceed forecasted
amounts or the value of the property itself. The discovery of additional contamination or the
imposition of additional cleanup obligations at our or third-party sites may result in significant
additional costs. Any material liability we incur could adversely impact our financial condition or
preclude us from making capital expenditures that would otherwise benefit our business.
Enactment of new environmental laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations,
or interpretation thereof, might require significant expenditures.
We may be unable to generate funds or other sources of liquidity and capital to fund
environmental liabilities or expenditures.
We are affected by changes in currency exchange rates.
We manufacture a significant amount of pulp and paper in Canada. The revenues for most of our
products are affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S.
dollar. As a result, any decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar
reduces our profitability. Our U.S. dollar sales, net of U.S. dollar purchases for our operating
activities, represent approximately US$978 million annually. In addition, our sales in Canada are
impacted by the exchange rate fluctuations, as the prices for many of our products are generally
driven by U.S. prices for similar products.
Exchange rate fluctuations are beyond our control and the U.S. dollar may continue to
depreciate against the Canadian dollar in the future, which would result in lower revenues and
margins. Since January 1, 2002, the Canadian dollar has appreciated more than 40% relative to the
U.S. dollar. This has had a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability of our Canadian
operations and may continue to have an adverse effect on our business, financial results and
financial condition. Sustained periods of a strong Canadian dollar could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial results and financial condition, including, but not limited to,
facility closures or impairment of assets.
We may be required to pay significant lumber export taxes
We may experience reduced revenues and margins on our softwood lumber business as a result of
lumber export taxes.
On April 27, 2006, the Canadian and U.S. Governments signed a term sheet which addresses the
refund of duty deposits and sets out a framework for the management of Canadian softwood lumber
exports to the U.S. for a seven-year period, with an option to renew for two additional years. On
July 1, 2006, Canada and the U.S. signed a more detailed legal text based upon the term sheet. On
September 12, 2006, Canada and the U.S. signed the Softwood Lumber Agreement 2006, which was
largely based on the July 1, 2006 legal text.
On October 12, 2006, Canada and the U.S. announced amendments that allow the settlement to be
implemented as of this date. The amendments include a process that allows the U.S. to proceed with
the revocation of countervailing and antidumping duties orders.
Canadian softwood lumber exporters will pay an export charge when the price of lumber is at or
below US$355 MFBN. Canadian regions can operate under either of the two export charge regimes for
periods of three years: an export charge with the charge varying with price or, an export charge
plus volume restraint, where both the rate and volume restraint vary with the price. For at least
the next 3 months, under present market conditions, all Canadian softwood lumber exports will be
subject to a 15% export which may rise to 22.5% in the event a province exceeds its total export
share. Each province will be allocated a share of exports based on historic share of the U.S.
market. If shipments from a province in a month exceed 110% of its base allocation, then the export
charge on shipments from that province during that month will be increased by 50%.
39
We are currently experiencing, and may continue to experience, reduced revenues and margins in
our wood business as a result of the application of the settlement agreement. The settlement
agreement could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial results and financial
condition, including, but not limited to, facility closures or impairment of assets.
We depend on third parties for transportation services.
We rely primarily on third parties for transportation of the products we manufacture and/or
distribute, as well as delivery of our raw materials. In particular, a significant portion of the
goods we manufacture and raw materials we use are transported by railroad or trucks, which are
highly regulated. If any of our third-party transportation providers were to fail to deliver the
goods we manufacture or distribute in a timely manner, we may be unable to sell those products at
full value, or at all. Similarly, if any of these providers were to fail to deliver raw materials
to us in a timely manner, we may be unable to manufacture our products in response to customer
demand. In addition, if any of these third parties were to cease operations or cease doing business
with us, we may be unable to replace them at reasonable cost. Any failure of a third-party
transportation provider to deliver raw materials or finished products in a timely manner could harm
our reputation, negatively impact our customer relationships and have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and operating results.
We have net deficits with respect to our pension plans and the actual cost of our pension plan
obligations could exceed current provisions. As of December 31, 2006, our defined benefit plans
were under funded by $167 million on a going concern basis.
As of December 31, 2006, our defined benefit plans were under funded by $167 million on a going
concern basis. Our future funding obligations for the defined benefit pension plans depend upon
changes to the level of benefits provided by the plans, the future performance of assets set aside
in trusts for these plans, the level of interest rates used to determine minimum funding levels,
actuarial data and experience, and any changes in government laws and regulations. Any adverse
change to any of these factors may require us to increase our cash contributions to the pension
plans, and those added contributions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows and
results of operations.
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our debt service obligations.
Our operations require substantial capital. If our capital resources are inadequate to provide for
our operating needs, capital expenditures and other cash requirements, this shortfall could have a
material adverse effect on our business and liquidity and impact our ability to service our debt.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations,
as we are subject to a number of general economic, business, financial, competitive, legislative,
regulatory and other factors beyond our control, or that, in the event we fail to comply with our
debt covenants, we will be able to renegotiate credit agreements or terms which will be
satisfactory.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to certain financial risks. We do not use
derivative instruments for speculative purposes. More information on financial instruments is
presented in Note 18 of the consolidated financial statements.
INTEREST RATE RISK
We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates on our cash
and cash equivalents, bank indebtedness, bank credit facility and long-term debt. We may manage
this interest rate exposure by the use of derivative instruments such as interest rate swap
contracts. Amounts accounted for under interest rate swap contracts are included in Financing
expenses.
CREDIT RISK
We are exposed to credit risk on the accounts receivable from our customers. In order to reduce
this risk, we review new customers credit histories before granting credit and conduct regular
reviews of existing customers credit performance.
We are also exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to our
financial instruments. We minimize this exposure by entering into contracts with counterparties
that we believe are of high credit quality. We usually do not obtain collateral or other security
to support financial instruments subject to credit risk. We regularly monitor the credit standing
of counterparties.
40
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
In order to reduce the potential negative effects of a fluctuating Canadian dollar, we have
entered into various arrangements to stabilize anticipated future net cash inflows denominated in
U.S. dollars. We hedge our foreign exchange exposure on anticipated sales denominated in U.S.
dollars through the use of options and forward contracts. Resulting gains and losses, including
premiums on options, are recognized when the designated sale is recognized and are included in
Sales.
PRICE RISK
We are exposed to price risk on purchases of bunker oil and sales of NBSK pulp. We hedge our
exposure to price risk associated with purchases of bunker oil through the use of cash settled
commodity swaps. Resulting gains and losses are recognized when the designated purchase is
recognized and are included in Cost of sales. For the exposure to price risk associated with
sales of NBSK pulp swap contracts, we do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting. As a
result, we account for these contracts at their fair value with resulting gains and losses being
included in Selling, general and administrative expenses.
41
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Our operating profit, net earnings and earnings per share can be impacted by the following
sensitivities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPROXIMATE ANNUAL IMPACT ON 1,2 |
|
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
NET |
|
|
EARNINGS |
|
|
|
PROFIT 7 |
|
|
EARNINGS |
|
|
PER SHARE |
|
(In millions of Canadian dollars, unless otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each US$10/unit change in the selling price of the following products:3,4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Papers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy and offset grades |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Uncoated commercial printing & publication and premium imaging grades |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Coated commercial printing & publication grades |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Technical & specialty grades |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Pulp net position |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Wood
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lumber |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (CAN$0.01 change in relative value to the U.S. dollar before hedging)3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of US$ pricing on export sales, net of US$ purchases |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% change in interest rate on our floating rate debt |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy3,5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas: US$0.25/MMBtu change in price before hedging |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Crude oil: US$1/barrel change in price before hedging |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Based on an exchange rate of $1.1111. |
|
2 |
|
Based on Canadian statutory tax rates of 31% |
|
3 |
|
Assumes the permanent closure of the Cornwall, Ottawa and Vancouver mills, effective January 1, 2006. |
|
4 |
|
Based on budgeted 2007 capacity (production, excluding Chenming) (ST, ADMT or MFBM). |
|
5 |
|
Based on budgeted 2007 consumption levels. The allocation between energy sources may
vary during the year in order to take advantage of market conditions. |
|
6 |
|
In addition to this direct impact, significant fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
currency will have an indirect impact on our product pricing in Canada over time given that
Canadian pricing is derived from U.S. dollar denominated prices. The combined direct and
indirect impact of a CAN$0.01 change in the relative value to the U.S. dollar before hedging
could reach $14 million. |
|
7 |
|
Operating profit is a non-GAAP measure; see section Specified items affecting
results and non-GAAP measures. |
Note that Domtar may, from time to time, hedge part of its foreign exchange, net pulp, interest
rate and energy positions, which may therefore impact the above sensitivities.
42
BENCHMARK PRICES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BENCHMARK PRICES1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Average 1997 + |
|
|
Papers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copy 20 lb sheets |
|
(US$/ton) |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
Offset 50 lb rolls |
|
(US$/ton) |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Coated publication, no. 3, 60 lb rolls |
|
(US$/ton) |
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
Pulp NBSK U.S. market |
|
(US$/ADMT) |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
Pulp NBHK Japan market2 |
|
(US$/ADMT) |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Wood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lumber 2x4x8 stud |
|
(US$/MFBM) |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Lumber 2x4 R/L, # 1 & # 2 |
|
(US$/MFBM) |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Average exchange rates |
|
CAN$ |
|
|
1.385 |
|
|
|
1.484 |
|
|
|
1.486 |
|
|
|
1.485 |
|
|
|
1.549 |
|
|
|
1.570 |
|
|
|
1.401 |
|
|
|
1.301 |
|
|
|
1.211 |
|
|
|
1.134 |
|
|
|
1.211 |
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
0.722 |
|
|
|
0.674 |
|
|
|
0.673 |
|
|
|
0.673 |
|
|
|
0.646 |
|
|
|
0.637 |
|
|
|
0.714 |
|
|
|
0.769 |
|
|
|
0.826 |
|
|
|
0.882 |
|
|
|
0.826 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Source: Pulp & Paper Week and Random Lengths. As such, these prices do not
necessarily reflect our transaction prices. |
|
2 |
|
Based on Pulp & Paper Weeks Southern Bleached Hardwood Kraft pulp prices for Japan,
increased by an average differential of US$15/ADMT between Northern and Southern Bleached
Hardwood Kraft pulp prices. |
HISTORICAL PRICES
KEY BENCHMARK PRICES
1997 TO 2006
43
OUTLOOK
Although Domtar benefited from higher operating rates and increasing selling prices for papers
and pulp, the North American demand for uncoated freesheet dropped in 2006 when compared to 2005.
Looking into 2007, Domtar does not anticipate any significant changes to these demand trends for
fine papers in North America, and the Company will continue to adjust its production to meet
customer demand.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2006, have concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information
relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would have been made known to them.
During the fourth quarter ending December 31, 2006, there was no change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
During 2006, in the course of its evaluation, management had identified certain deficiencies
in its internal control over financial reporting which the Company does not believe, either
individually or in the aggregate, resulted in a material weakness to its internal control over
financial reporting.
As of December 31, 2006, management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based
on this assessment, management has determined that the Companys internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006, and issued Managements Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting dated February 22, 2007 to that effect.
Additional information, including the Companys 2006 Annual Information Form (AIF) and Form 40-F,
may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Montreal, Canada
February 22, 2007
44
DOMTAR INC.
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Domtar is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 15a-15(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Domtars internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of
Domtars Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Companys financial
statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in Canada.
As of December 31, 2006, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 was effective.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent
auditor.
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond Royer
|
|
|
|
Daniel Buron |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Montreal, Quebec
February 22, 2007
1
DOMTAR INC.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Shareholders of Domtar Inc.
We have completed an integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting of Domtar Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and audits of its December 31, 2005
and December 31, 2004 consolidated financial statements. Our opinions, based on our audits, are
presented below.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Domtar Inc. as at December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, retained earnings
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Corporations management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of the Corporations financial statements as at December 31, 2006 and 2005
and for the three-year period then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing
standards and the standards of the Public Corporation Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial
statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. A financial statement audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Corporation as at December 31, 2006 and December
31, 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2006 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
We have also audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that the Corporation maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on managements assessment and
on the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the
standards of the Public Corporation Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of
internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
2
DOMTAR INC.
A Corporations internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A Corporations internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Corporation; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Corporations assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Corporation maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as at December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects, based
on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. Furthermore,
in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
Montreal, Quebec
February 22, 2007
3
DOMTAR INC.
CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 4) |
|
|
(Note 4) |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
|
4,247 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
3,392 |
|
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
3,798 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Antidumping and countervailing duties refund |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closure and restructuring costs (Note 5) |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Net gains on disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
Financing expenses (Note 6) |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
Income tax expense (recovery) (Note 7) |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 4) |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share (in dollars) (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
(1.36 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
(1.36 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
DOMTAR INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS AT DECEMBER 31
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
Receivables (Note 9) |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
Inventories (Note 10) |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Income and other taxes receivable |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Future income taxes (Note 7) |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
Property, plant and equipment (Note 11) |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
Assets held for sale (Note 4) |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
Other assets (Note 12) |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,955 |
|
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank indebtedness |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Trade and other payables (Note 13) |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
Income and other taxes payable |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Long-term debt due within one year (Note 14) |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
Long-term debt (Note 14) |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
Future income taxes (Note 7) |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
292 |
|
Other liabilities and deferred credits (Note 15) |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares (Note 17) |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Common shares (Note 17) |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
Contributed surplus (Note 17) |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments (Note 19) |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,955 |
|
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Approved by the Board:
|
|
|
Brian M. Levitt, Director
|
|
Raymond Royer, Director |
5
DOMTAR INC.
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note 4) |
|
|
(Note 4) |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-down of property, plant and equipment (Note 5) |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Future income taxes (Note 7) |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
Closure and
restructuring costs, excluding write-down of property, plant and equipment (Note 5) |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Net gains on disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in working capital and other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables (Note 9) |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Income and other taxes |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Early settlement of interest rate swap contracts (Note 18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Payments of closure and restructuring costs, net of proceeds on disposition |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from (used for) operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of business (Note 4) |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from (used for) investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payments |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Change in bank indebtedness |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in revolving bank credit, net of expenses |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Issuance of long-term debt, net of expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Premium on redemption of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued, net of expenses |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Redemptions of preferred shares |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from discontinued operations (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from (used for) discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Translation adjustments related to cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year, related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Discontinued operations (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
6
DOMTAR INC.
CONSOLIDATED RETAINED EARNINGS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) at beginning of year as reported |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy (Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit) at beginning of year as restated |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Dividends on common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Dividends on preferred shares |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit) at end of year |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
7
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE I.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements are expressed in Canadian dollars and have been prepared
in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (Canadian GAAP). These
financial statements differ in certain respects from those prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and are not intended to provide certain
disclosures which would typically be found in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. The significant differences are described in Note 23. These consolidated financial statements
are dated February 21, 2007.
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Domtar Inc. and its subsidiaries
(the Corporation) as well as its joint ventures (collectively Domtar). Investments over which the
Corporation exercises significant influence are accounted for using the equity method. The
Corporations interests in joint ventures are accounted for using the proportionate consolidation
method.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with Canadian GAAP,
which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the year, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates, including those related to
environmental matters, useful lives, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, pension and
other employee future benefit plans, income taxes, closure and restructuring costs and asset
retirement obligations, based on currently available information. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES
SELF-SUSTAINING FOREIGN OPERATIONS
For foreign subsidiaries that are considered financially and operationally self-sustaining, the
current rate method of translation of foreign currencies has been used. Under this method, assets
and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars at the rate in effect at the balance sheet
date and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. All
gains and losses arising from the translation of the financial statements of these foreign
subsidiaries are included in the Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments account
under Shareholders equity.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS AND INTEGRATED FOREIGN OPERATIONS
For foreign currency transactions and foreign subsidiaries that are considered financially and
operationally integrated, the temporal method of translation of foreign currencies has been used.
Monetary items are translated at the rate in effect at the balance sheet date, non-monetary items
are translated at their historical rate (as well as the related amortization) and revenues and
expenses are translated at the rate in effect at the transaction date or at the average exchange
rates during the year as appropriate. Translation gains and losses, except those on long-term debt,
are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses.
8
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
FOREIGN CURRENCY LONG-TERM DEBT
For the Corporations long-term debt designated as a hedge of the net investment in
self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries, exchange gains and losses are included in the Accumulated
foreign currency translation adjustments account under Shareholders equity. Prior to the fourth
quarter of 2004, a portion of the foreign currency denominated long-term debt of the Corporation
was designated as a hedge of future U.S. dollar revenue stream and exchange gains and losses were
deferred and were recognized when the designated revenue is earned or when it becomes probable that
the forecasted transaction will not occur, as the hedge then ceases to be effective.
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Variable interest entities (VIE) are entities in which equity investors do not have a
controlling financial interest or the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by
other parties. Domtar consolidates the VIE if Domtar is considered the VIEs primary beneficiary,
defined as the party that receives the majority of the expected residual returns and/or that
absorbs the majority of the entitys expected losses.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Domtar recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, when goods are
shipped, when there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, when the related revenue
is fixed or determinable, when collection is considered reasonably assured and when the customer
takes title and assumes the majority of the risks and rewards of ownership.
INCOME TAXES
Domtar uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method,
future tax assets and liabilities are determined according to differences between the carrying
amounts and tax bases of the assets and liabilities. The change in the net future tax asset or
liability is included in earnings and in the Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments
account under Shareholders equity. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
or substantively enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply in the years in which the assets and
liabilities are expected to be recovered or settled. Domtar does not provide for income taxes on
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are not expected to be repatriated in the
foreseeable future.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments with original maturities of
less than three months and are presented at cost.
RECEIVABLES
Receivables are recorded at cost net of a provision for doubtful accounts that is based on
expected collectibility. Gains or losses on securitization of receivables are calculated as the
difference between the carrying amount of the receivables sold and the sum of the cash proceeds on
sale and the fair value of the retained subordinate interest in such receivables on the date of
transfer. Fair value is determined on a discounted cash flow basis. Costs related to the sales of
receivables are recognized in earnings in the period when the sale occurs.
9
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
INVENTORIES
Inventories of operating and maintenance supplies and raw materials are valued at the lower of
average cost and replacement cost. Work in process and finished goods are valued at the lower of
average cost and net realizable value, and include the cost of raw materials, direct labor and
manufacturing overhead expenses.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated amortization including asset
impairment write-down. Interest costs are capitalized for capital projects in excess of $10 million
and having a duration in excess of one year. For timber limits and timberlands, amortization is
calculated using the unit of production method. For all other assets, amortization is calculated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Buildings are
amortized over periods of 10 to 40 years and machinery and equipment over periods of 3 to 20 years.
The amortization expense is reported net of the amount of the amortization of deferred credits
related to property, plant and equipment. No amortization is recorded on assets under construction.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment upon the occurrence of events or changes in
circumstances indicating that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable, as measured
by comparing their net book value to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated by
their use. Impaired assets are recorded at fair value, determined principally by using discounted
future cash flows expected from their use and eventual disposition.
GOODWILL
Goodwill is not amortized and is subject to an annual impairment test, or more frequently if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. Testing for impairment is
accomplished mainly by determining whether the fair value of a segment, based upon discounted cash
flows, exceeds the net carrying amount of that segment as of the assessment date. If the fair value
is greater than the net carrying amount, no impairment is necessary. In the event that the net
carrying amount exceeds the sum of the discounted cash flows, a second test must be performed
whereby the fair value of the segments goodwill must be estimated to determine if it is less than
its net carrying amount. Fair value of goodwill is estimated in the same way as goodwill was
determined at the date of the acquisition in a business combination, that is, the excess of the
fair value of the segment over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the segment.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets are recorded at cost. Expenses and discounts related to the issuance of long-term
debt are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related obligation.
DEFERRED CREDITS
Deferred credits comprise the deferred net gain on early settlements of interest rate swap
contracts and grants and investment tax credits obtained upon the acquisition of property, plant
and equipment and, in periods prior to Domtars sale of its interest in Norampac, the deferred gain
on the contribution of net assets to Norampac . The deferred gain on the contribution of net
assets to Norampac was amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. The deferred net gain on
early settlements of interest rate swap contracts is amortized as an adjustment to Financing
expenses over the initially designated periods of the respective interest payments. Investment tax
credits are amortized on the same basis as the related property, plant and equipment.
10
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS
Environmental expenditures for effluent treatment, air emission, landfill operation and
closure, asbestos containment and removal, bark pile management, silvicultural activities and site
remediation (together referred to as environmental matters) are expensed or capitalized depending
on their future economic benefit. In the normal course of business, Domtar incurs certain operating
costs for environmental matters that are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for property, plant and
equipment that prevent future environmental impacts are capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over 10 to 40 years. Provisions for environmental matters are not discounted
and are recorded when remediation efforts are likely and can be reasonably determined.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Asset retirement obligations are recognized, at fair value, in the period in which Domtar
incurs a legal obligation associated to the retirement of an asset. Conditional asset retirement
obligations are recognized, at fair value, when the fair value of the liability can be reasonably
estimated. The associated costs are capitalized as part of the carrying value of the related asset
and depreciated over its remaining useful life. The liability is accreted using a credit adjusted
risk-free interest rate.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER STOCK-BASED PAYMENTS
Domtar uses the fair value based approach of accounting for stock-based payments to directors
and for stock options granted to its employees. Any consideration paid by plan participants on the
exercise of share options or the purchase of shares is credited to stated capital together with any
related stock-based compensation expense.
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the options, share
purchase rights and bonus shares. For employee share purchase discounts, compensation expense is
recognized when employees purchase shares. The contributed surplus component of the stock-based
compensation is transferred to capital stock upon the issuance of common shares.
Deferred Share Units are amortized over their vesting periods and remeasured at each reporting
period, until settlement, using the quoted market value. The cost of the common shares acquired by
the Corporation under the Restricted Stock Plan is amortized over the restricted period. Deferred
Share Units and common shares acquired under the Restricted Stock Plan are accounted for in
compensation expense, in Other liabilities and deferred credits and Other assets.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Derivative instruments are contracts that require or provide an option to exchange cash flows
or payments determined by applying certain rates, indices or changes therein to notional contract
amounts. Derivative instruments are utilized by Domtar in the management of its foreign currency,
price risk and interest rate exposures. Except for two interest rate swap contracts of Norampac,
which were assumed through business acquisitions, Domtar does not use derivative instruments for
speculative purposes. On December 29, 2006, Domtar sold its interest in Norampac.
DERIVATIVES DESIGNATED FOR HEDGE ACCOUNTING
In order for a derivative to qualify for hedge accounting, the hedge relationship must be
designated and formally documented at its inception, outlining the particular risk management
objective and strategy, the specific asset, liability or cash flow being hedged, as well as how
effectiveness is assessed. The derivative must be effective in accomplishing the objective of
offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flow attributable to the risk being hedged both
at inception and over the term of the hedging relationship.
11
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
When derivative instruments have been designated within a hedge relationship and are highly
effective in offsetting the identified risk characteristics of specific financial assets and
liabilities, or group of financial assets and liabilities, hedge accounting is applied to these
derivative instruments. Hedge accounting requires that gains, losses, revenues and expenses of a
hedging item be recognized in the same period that the associated gains, losses, revenues and
expenses of the hedged item are recognized.
Realized and unrealized gains or losses associated with hedging instruments for which the
underlying hedged items are either sold, paid or terminated are recognized to earnings. Realized
and unrealized gains or losses when hedging instruments have ended or ceased to be effective prior
to their maturity are deferred and recognized in earnings concurrently with the recognition of the
item being hedged.
Domtar hedges its foreign exchange exposure on anticipated sales denominated in U.S. dollars
through the use of options and forward contracts. Resulting gains and losses, including premiums on
options, are recognized when the designated sale is recognized and are included in Sales.
Domtar hedges its exposure to price risk associated with purchases of bunker oil through the use of
cash settled commodity swaps. Norampac hedged its exposure to price risk associated with purchases
of electricity through the use of cash settled commodity swaps. Resulting gains and losses are
recognized when the designated purchase is recognized and are included in Cost of sales.
Domtar hedges its exposure to interest rate on its long-term debt through the use of interest rate
swap contracts. Amounts accounted for under interest rate swap contracts are included in Financing
expenses.
DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED FOR HEDGE ACCOUNTING
For the exposure to price risk associated with sales of Northern Bleached Softwood Kraft (NBSK)
pulp swap contracts, as well as old corrugated containers, unbleached kraft linerboard and
semi-chemical medium paper, Domtar does not meet the requirements for hedge accounting. As a
result, Domtar accounts for these contracts at their fair value with resulting gains and losses
being included in Selling, general and administrative expenses or, for items related to Norampac,
as part of discontinued operations.
For the two interest rate swap contracts of Norampac, which were used for speculative purposes, the
change in their fair value was recorded in discontinued operations.
12
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
PENSIONS
Domtars plans include funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans and defined
contribution plans. Domtar accrues the cost of defined benefit plans as determined by independent
actuaries. The net periodic benefit cost includes the following:
|
|
|
the cost of pension benefits provided in exchange for employees services rendered during the year, |
|
|
|
|
the interest cost of pension obligations, |
|
|
|
|
the expected long-term return on pension fund assets based on a market-related value
determined using a five-year moving average market value for equity securities and fair
value for other asset classes, |
|
|
|
|
gains or losses on settlements and curtailments, |
|
|
|
|
the straight-line amortization of past service costs and plan amendments over the
average remaining service period of approximately 13 years of the active employee group
covered by the plans, |
|
|
|
|
the amortization of cumulative unrecognized net actuarial gains and losses in excess of
10% of the greater of the accrued benefit obligation or market-related value of plan assets
at the beginning of the year over the average remaining service period of approximately 13
years of the active employee group covered by the plans. |
The defined benefit plans obligations are determined in accordance with the projected benefit
method prorated on services.
OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS
Domtar accrues the cost of post-retirement benefits other than pensions as determined by
independent actuaries. These benefits, which are funded by Domtar as they become due, include life
insurance programs, medical and dental benefits and short-term and long-term disability programs.
Domtar amortizes the cumulative unrecognized net actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10% of the
accrued benefit obligation at the beginning of the year over the average remaining service period
of approximately 15 years of the active employee group covered by the plans.
INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS
Investment tax credits are recognized in earnings as a reduction of research and development
expenses when Domtar has made the qualifying expenditures and has a reasonable assurance that the
credits will be realized.
DISCLOSURE OF GUARANTEES
A guarantee is a contract or an indemnification agreement that contingently requires Domtar to
make payments to the other party of the contract or agreement, based on changes in an underlying
item that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity security of the other party or on a
third partys failure to perform under an obligating agreement. It could also be an indirect
guarantee of the indebtedness of another party, even though the payment to the other party may not
be based on changes in an underlying item that is related to an asset, a liability or an equity
security of the other party.
13
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
COUNTERVAILING AND ANTIDUMPING DUTIES
Prior to the Softwood Lumber Agreement 2006 that was rendered effective October 12, 2006, cash
deposits for countervailing and antidumping duties (lumber duties) made, were expensed as the
deposits for softwood lumber export sales to the United States were made. The lumber duties
expensed were presented in Cost of sales. Recoveries of cash deposits for lumber duties are only
recognized when the amounts are reasonably measurable and their recovery is virtually certain.
Recoveries resulting from the Softwood Lumber Agreement 2006 were recorded in Antidumping and
countervailing duties refund. The 18.06% special charge imposed by the Canadian Government
relating to this refund is provided for in Trade and other payables. Export taxes imposed by the
Government of Canada are expensed as softwood lumber export sales to the United States are made.
These export taxes are presented in Cost of sales.
14
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
2006
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION FOR EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO RETIRE BEFORE THE VESTING DATE
In July 2006, the Emerging Issues Committee of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
(CICA) issued EIC 162, Stock-based Compensation for Employees Eligible to Retire before the
Vesting Date. EIC-162 clarifies the accounting for compensation costs relating to stock-based
awards granted to employees. EIC-162 requires that: i) compensation costs attributable to
stock-based awards granted to employees who are eligible to retire on the grant date be recognized
on the grant date; and ii) compensation cost attributable to stock-based awards granted to
employees who will become eligible to retire during the vesting period be recognized over the
period from the grant date to the date of retirement eligibility. This abstract is to be applied
retroactively, with restatement of prior periods, and is effective for the year ended December 31,
2006. The adoption of this guideline had no significant impact on the consolidated financial
statements under Canadian GAAP.
2004
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
On January 1, 2004, Domtar adopted retroactively with restatement of prior periods the new CICA
Handbook Section 3110 Asset Retirement Obligations, which requires entities to record a liability
at fair value, in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated to the retirement of
an asset. The associated costs are capitalized as part of the carrying value of the related asset
and depreciated over its remaining useful life. The liability is accreted using a credit adjusted
risk-free interest rate. Section 3110 is analogous to the requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) 143 Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which was adopted
for U.S. GAAP purposes on January 1, 2003. Asset retirement obligations in connection with the
adoption of Section 3110 were primarily linked to landfill capping obligations, asbestos removal
obligations and demolition of certain abandoned buildings. For such assets, a liability is
initially recognized in the period in which sufficient information exists to estimate a range of
possible settlement dates. The adoption of Section 3110 has decreased the December 31, 2003
retained earnings by $3 million, $0.01 per common share, decreased assets by $7 million and
decreased liabilities by $4 million.
IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS NOT YET IMPLEMENTED
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
On July 1, 2006, the Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) issued a replacement of Handbook
Section 1506 Accounting Changes. The new standard allows for voluntary changes in accounting
policy only when they result in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant
information, requires changes in accounting policy to be applied retrospectively unless doing so is
impracticable, requires prior period effects of changes in accounting policies, estimates and
errors on the financial statements. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or
after January 1, 2007, with earlier adoption encouraged. The Company does not expect the adoption
of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
15
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING CHANGES (CONTINUED)
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In April 2005, the CICA issued three new Handbook Sections related to financial instruments:
Section 3855 Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement, Section 3865 Hedges and
Section 1530 Comprehensive Income. These Sections apply to fiscal years beginning on or after
October 1, 2006.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT
Section 3855 expands on Handbook Section 3860 Financial Instruments Disclosure and
Presentation, by prescribing when a financial instrument is to be recognized on the balance sheet
and at what amount. It also specifies how financial instrument gains and losses are to be
presented. Under this new Section:
|
|
All financial assets and liabilities will be carried at fair value in
the consolidated balance sheet, except loans and receivables,
investments held-to-maturity and non-trading financial liabilities,
which will be carried at amortized cost. |
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading financial assets
and liabilities will be recognized immediately in the consolidated
statement of income. |
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses on financial assets that are available for
sale will be recognized in other comprehensive income until their
realization, after which these amounts will be recognized in the
consolidated statement of income. |
|
|
|
All derivatives financial instruments will be carried at fair value in
the consolidated balance sheet, including those derivatives that are
embedded in other contracts but are not closely related to the host
contract. |
|
|
|
Gains and losses on instruments designated as cash flow hedges are
recognized in other comprehensive income, except for the ineffective
portion of the hedges which will be recognized in net income. |
HEDGES
Section 3865 provides alternative accounting treatments to those found in Section 3855 for
entities who choose to designate qualifying transactions as hedges for accounting purposes. It
replaces and expands on AcG-13 Hedging Relationships, and the hedging guidance in Section 1650
Foreign Currency Translation by specifying how hedge accounting is applied and what disclosures
are necessary when it is applied. Under this new statement:
|
|
In a fair value hedge, hedging derivatives are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in the
consolidated statement of income. The changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk will
also be recorded in consolidated income by way of a corresponding adjustment of the carrying amount of the hedged items
recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
|
|
In a cash flow hedge, the changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments will be recorded in other comprehensive
income. These amounts will be reclassified in the consolidated statement of income in the periods in which results are
affected by the cash flows of the hedged item. |
|
|
|
Hedges of net investments in self-sustaining foreign operations are treated in a manner similar to cash flow hedges. |
|
|
|
Any hedge ineffectiveness will be recorded in the consolidated statement of income. |
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Section 1530 introduces a new requirement to present certain revenues, expenses, gains and
losses, that otherwise would not be immediately recorded in income, in a comprehensive income
statement with the same prominence as other statements that constitute a complete set of financial
statements.
16
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING CHANGES (CONTINUED)
Domtar is currently completing its evaluation of the impact that these accounting
pronouncements will have on its first quarter 2007 financial statements. Domtar expects the more
significant impacts of applying these new Sections to relate to:
|
|
the requirement to present a new statement entitled Comprehensive income, |
|
|
|
the recognition of the fair value of cash flow hedges on the balance sheet with the offset to other comprehensive income, |
|
|
|
the reclassification of foreign currency translation adjustments from Accumulated foreign currency translation
adjustments to Other comprehensive income, |
|
|
|
the reclassification of the deferred gains on the early settlement of interest rate swap contracts from Other liabilities
and deferred credits to Long-term debt, |
|
|
|
the reclassification of unamortized debt issue costs and long-term debt discounts from Other asset to Long-term debt. |
As such, as at January 1, 2007, Domtar expects Other assets to decrease by approximately $26
million, Future income tax asset to increase by approximately $2 million, Other long-term
liabilities and deferred credits to decrease by $5 million, Long-term debt to decrease by $14
million, Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments to be nil and Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to be a loss of $207 million.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT DISCLOSURES AND PRESENTATION
In April 2005, the AcSB issued Handbook Section 3861 Financial instruments Disclosure and
presentation. This section establishes standards for presentation of financial instruments and
non-financial derivatives and identifies information that should be disclosed about them. This
section applies to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006. In December 2006, the AcSB
issued Handbook Section 3862 Financial instruments Disclosures and Handbook Section 3863
Financial instruments Presentation. These standards revise Section 3861. Under these new
sections, entities will be required to disclose information that enables users to evaluate the
significance of a financial instrument to an entitys financial position and performance. These
sections apply to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. Domtar does not expect the
initial adoption of these standards to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
CAPITAL DISCLOSURE
In December 2006, the AsCB issued Handbook Section 1535 Capital Disclosures, which
establishes guidelines for the disclosure of information regarding an entitys capital and how it
is managed. This standard requires disclosure of an entitys objectives, policies and processes
for managing capital, quantitative data about what the entity regards as capital and whether the
entity has complied with any capital requirements and, if it has not complied, the consequences of
such non-compliance. This standard is effective for interim and annual financial statements
relating to fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2007. Domtar does not expect the initial
adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
17
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Domtar reviews the carrying amount of long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable through future operations.
This is accomplished by determining whether projected undiscounted future cash flows from
operations exceed the net carrying amount of the assets as of the assessment date (Step I test).
Impaired assets are recorded at fair value, determined principally by using discounted future cash
flows expected from their use and eventual disposition (Step II test). Estimates of future cash
flows and fair value require judgment and may change over time.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, Domtar conducted Step I impairment tests on most of the Canadian
Pulp and Paper manufacturing facilities and the Wood segment.
Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset included key
assumptions related to trend prices, the 10 to 15 years forecasted exchange rate for the U.S.
dollar and the estimated useful life of the long-lived assets.
The trend prices were based on an analysis of external price trends, including Resource Information
Systems, Inc. (RISI), as well as normalized pulp, paper and wood pricing over a business cycle at
the mills subjected to the impairment tests.
The forecasted Canadian-U.S. foreign exchange rate assumptions were based on independent market
information, as well as analysis of historical data, trends and cycles. Management expects the 10
to 15 years average rate to be approximately CAN$1.00 = US$0.75.
Domtar concluded that the recognition of an impairment loss for the business units analyzed was not
required.
Given the inherent imprecision and corresponding importance of the key assumptions used in the
impairment test, it is reasonably possible that changes in future conditions may lead management to
use different key assumptions, which could require a material change in the net carrying amount of
the assets tested for impairment. The total net carrying amount of these assets was $873 million as
at December 31, 2006.
18
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 4.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
In December 2006, Domtar announced that it had reached an agreement in principle to sell its
50% interest in Norampac Inc. to Cascades Inc. for a cash consideration of $560 million. The sale
was finalized on December 29, 2006, accordingly Norampac will no longer be included in the
Packaging segment but classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated earnings and cash
flows.
In November 2005, as part of its restructuring program, Domtar announced its intention to sell the
Vancouver, British Columbia paper mill. Effective in the second quarter of 2006, the Vancouver
paper mill was permanently closed. Considering the fact that its major product line will not
continue to be sold, the Vancouver paper mill will no longer be included in the Papers segment but
classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated earnings and cash flows and the property,
plant and equipment as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet. In July 2006, Domtar
reached an agreement to sell the Vancouver paper mill property, subject to a number of closing
conditions.
The consolidated earnings and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been
restated for purposes of comparability.
The following table provides selected financial information related to discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Closure and restructuring costs |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
Financing expenses |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of deferred gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Gain on disposal of business |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) from discontinued operations per share (in dollars) |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) from discontinued operations per share (in dollars) |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 5.
CLOSURE AND RESTRUCTURING COSTS
In 2005, Domtars management announced a series of targeted measures aimed at returning the
Corporation to profitability. The plan included closures of the Cornwall and Ottawa, Ontario paper
mills, the Grand-Remous and Malartic, Quebec sawmills, the sale of the Vancouver, British Columbia
paper mill and cost-cutting initiatives. This workforce reduction and restructuring plan is in
addition to the plans announced in 2004, which covered the Corporations paper and merchant
operations in Canada and the United States.
In 2004, Domtar sold the St. Catharines, Ontario paper mill, which was closed in 2002, for $1
million to a third party who agreed to purchase it in its existing state. As such, the majority of
the remaining closure cost provision was reversed.
In 2004, Domtars management decided to permanently shut down the sawmill located in Chapleau,
Ontario.
As at December 31, 2006, the balance of the provision was $26 million (2005 $83 million), which
includes $20 million (2005 $75 million) related to the Papers segment and $6 million (2005 $8
million) related to the Wood segment.
Estimates of cash flows and fair value relating to closures and restructurings require judgment.
Closure and restructuring costs are based on managements best estimates of future events at
December 31, 2006. Closure costs and restructuring estimates are dependent on future events.
Although Domtar does not anticipate significant changes, the actual costs may differ from these
estimates due to subsequent developments such as the results of environmental studies, the ability
to find a buyer for assets set to be dismantled and demolished and other business developments. As
such, additional costs and further working capital and property, plant and equipment write-downs
may be required in future periods.
The following table provides a reconciliation of all closure and restructuring costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Papers |
|
|
Wood |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Papers |
|
|
Wood |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Papers |
|
|
Wood |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
Labor costs |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Write-down of certain inventory items |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other closure related costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Reversal of provision |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Closure and restructuring costs |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further costs related to the plans expected to be incurred over 2007 and thereafter are not
significant.
20
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 5. CLOSURE AND RESTRUCTURING COSTS (CONTINUED)
The following table provides a reconciliation of all closure and restructuring cost provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Balance at beginning of year from continuing operations |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Severance payments |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Reclass to pension plans |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of provision |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor costs |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Environmental costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year from continuing operations |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 6.
FINANCING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Interest on long-term debt |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Exchange gains on long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receivables securitization |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Net interest recoveries related to interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Refinancing expenses (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred net gain on early settlements of interest
rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Amortization of debt issue costs and other |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Less: Income from short-term investments |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments (cash receipts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of interest income and amounts capitalized |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Net cash receipts related to interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2005, the Corporation recorded $7 million for a call premium paid to redeem the 8.75% notes. |
22
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 7.
INCOME TAXES
The following table provides a reconciliation of income taxes computed at the Canadian
statutory rate to income tax recovery presented on the Consolidated earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Combined basic Canadian federal and provincial tax rate
(statutory income tax rate) |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
Income tax expense (recovery) based on statutory income tax rate |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Large corporation tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Canadian manufacturing and processing activities |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign rate differential |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Reassessment of prior years by tax authorities |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Impact of increase (decrease) in income tax rate on
future income taxes |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent difference on foreign exchange losses (gains) |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (recovery) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Future |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash receipts for income taxes in 2006 amounted to $12 million (2005 net payments amounted to
$6 million; 2004 net payments amounted to $9 million).
23
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The following table provides the geographic distribution of the income tax expense (recovery):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Components of future income tax assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting provisions not deductible for tax purposes |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
Losses and other deductions carryforward |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
Deferred credits |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
|
(786 |
) |
Pension and other employee future benefit plans |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange on long-term debt |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net future income tax liability |
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current future income tax asset |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Net non-current future income tax asset |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Net current future income tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Net non-current future income tax liability |
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2006, Domtar had federal net operating losses carryforward of $1,158 million.
These federal net operating losses carryforward are set to expire between 2010 and 2025.
25
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 8.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
The basic net earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss)
applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
year.
The diluted net earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net earnings (loss)
applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
year, plus the effects of dilutive common share equivalents such as options and share purchase
loans. The diluted net earnings (loss) per share is calculated using the treasury method, as if all
common share equivalents had been exercised at the beginning of the year, or the date of the
issuance, as the case may be, and that the funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common
shares of Domtar at the average trading price of the common shares during the year. Stock options
to purchase common shares are not included in the computation of diluted net earnings (loss) per
share in years when net losses are recorded given that they are anti-dilutive.
The following table provides the reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings (loss) per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Dividend requirements of preferred shares |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common shares |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Dividend requirements of preferred shares |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (millions) |
|
|
|
230.5 |
|
|
|
|
229.7 |
|
|
|
228.7 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities (millions) |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding (millions) |
|
|
|
230.6 |
|
|
|
|
229.7 |
|
|
|
228.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share (in dollars) |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
(1.36 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing operations per share (in dollars) |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
(1.36 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share (in dollars) |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share (in dollars) |
|
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
|
|
(1.69 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 8. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (CONTINUED)
The following table provides the securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings per
share in the future but that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per
share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Number of shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
4,023,607 |
|
|
|
|
4,833,126 |
|
|
|
5,306,553 |
|
Bonus shares |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
136,675 |
|
|
|
226,693 |
|
Rights |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 9.
RECEIVABLES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
Subordinate interest in securitized receivables |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
Silvicultural credits receivable |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Sales taxes receivable |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES SECURITIZATION
Domtar uses securitization of its receivables as a source of financing by reducing its working
capital requirements. Domtars securitizations consist of the sale of receivables, or the sale of
senior beneficial interest in them, to special purpose trusts managed by financial institutions for
multiple sellers of receivables. The agreements normally allow the daily sale of new receivables to
replace those that have been collected. They also limit the cash that can be received from the sale
of the senior beneficial interest. Such sales of receivables are contingent upon annual renewals
and retaining specified credit ratings. The subordinate interest retained by Domtar is included in
Receivables and will be collected only after the senior beneficial interest has been settled. The
book value of the retained subordinated interests approximates fair value.
Domtar retains responsibility for servicing the receivables sold but does not record a servicing
asset or liability as the fees received by Domtar for this service approximate the fair value of
the services rendered.
In 2006, a net charge of $14 million (2005 $8 million; 2004 $6 million) resulted from the
programs described below and was included in Financing expenses.
U.S. AND CANADIAN ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PROGRAM
In January 2002, Domtar entered into an agreement, which was renewed in December 2004 and was
scheduled to mature in December 2005 for the securitization of U.S. receivables. The agreement has
been extended by the administrator of the program until the new settlement. In February 2006,
Domtar entered into a three-year agreement, including both U.S. and Canadian receivables. The
maximum cash consideration that can be received from the sale of receivables under this combined
agreement is $221 million (US$190 million).
28
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 9. RECEIVABLES (CONTINUED)
At December 31, the following balances were outstanding under this program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
US$ |
|
Securitized receivables |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Senior beneficial interest held by third parties |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinate interest in securitized receivables
retained by Domtar |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, the net cash outflow from the sale of senior beneficial interests in the U.S. and Canadian
receivables was $140 million (US$120 million) (2005 cash outflow from the sale of U.S.
receivables of $9 million (US$8 million); 2004 cash inflow from the sale of U.S. receivables of
$17 million (US$14 million)) and was included in the Consolidated cash flows as a use or source of
cash from receivables.
CANADIAN ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PROGRAM
In December 2000, Domtar entered into an agreement, which was renewed in December 2003, for the
securitization of Canadian receivables for a maximum cash consideration of $75 million. On December
15, 2005, the parties agreed not to renew the agreement, which expired in December 2005. Since
February 2006, Canadian receivables are sold in the new combined program mentioned above.
In 2006, the net cash inflow from the sale of senior beneficial interests in the Canadian
receivables was nil (2005 cash outflow of $58 million; 2004 cash inflow of $5 million) and was
included in the Consolidated cash flows as a use or source of cash from receivables.
29
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 10.
INVENTORIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Work in process and finished goods |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
|
376 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
Operating and maintenance supplies |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 11.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
2,683 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Timber limits and land |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Assets under construction |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,590 |
|
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2006, a net carrying amount of $7 million (2005 $7 million) included in
Buildings is held under capital leases ($9 million for cost (2005 $9 million) and $2 million for
accumulated amortization (2005 $2 million)) and a net carrying amount of $4 million (2005 $4
million) included in Timber limits and land is held under capital leases.
As at December 31, 2006, the net carrying amount of idled and permanently closed facilities
amounted to $37 million (2005 $5 million).
31
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 12.
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Accrued benefit asset defined benefit pension plans (Note 21) |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
Investment tax credits receivable |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Unamortized debt issue costs |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Future income tax assets |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Investments and advances |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Discount on long-term debt |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 13.
TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
335 |
|
Payroll-related accruals |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Payables on capital projects |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Rebates accruals |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Accrued benefit liability defined benefit pension plans (Note 21) |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Accrued benefit liability other employee future benefit plans (Note 21) |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Provision for environment and other asset retirement obligations (Note 15) |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Closure and restructuring costs excluding costs for defined benefit pension plans
and site remediation (Note 5) |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 14.
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
The Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured debentures and notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% Debentures |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
7.875% Notes (2006 and 2005 - US$600) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
5.375% Notes (2006 and 2005 - US$350) |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
7.125% Notes (2006 and 2005 - US$400) |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
9.5% Debentures (2006 and 2005 -US$125) |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
10.85% Debentures |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Unsecured revolving credit facility |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
2028 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norampac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75% Notes (2006 - nil and 2005 - US$125) |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
Secured revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2006 - nil;
2005 CAN$49 and 7) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
Less: Due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2006, principal long-term debt repayments, including capital lease obligations,
in each of the next five years amounted to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
34
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 14. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
THE CORPORATION
UNSECURED DEBENTURES AND NOTES
On August 5, 2005, the Corporation issued $487 million (US$400 million) 7.125% notes due in
2015 at an issue price of $482 million (US$396 million). The gross proceeds from the sale of the
notes was used to redeem the 8.75% notes due in August 2006 for an amount of approximately $176
million (US$150 million) and to repay most of the unsecured revolving credit facility then
outstanding. Issuance expenses for the new notes of $5 million (US$4 million) were deferred and
will be amortized over the duration of the notes.
The 10% and 10.85% debentures each have purchase fund requirements, whereby the Corporation
undertakes to make all reasonable efforts to purchase quarterly, for cancellation, a portion of the
aggregate principal amount of the debentures at prices not exceeding par.
BANK FACILITY
The Corporation has an unsecured revolving credit facility of US$600 million that expires in
2010.
Borrowings under this unsecured revolving credit facility bear interest at a rate based on the
Canadian dollar bankers acceptance or U.S. dollar LIBOR rate or on the Canadian or U.S. prime
rate, each with an added spread that varies with Domtars credit rating. This credit facility also
requires commitment fees that vary with Domtars credit rating.
As at December 31, 2006, there were no borrowings (2005 $175 million, of which $15 million was in
the form of overdraft and included in Bank indebtedness, and $160 million was included in
Long-term debt) under the unsecured revolving credit facility that was outstanding. In addition,
as at December 31, 2006, the Corporation had outstanding letters of credit pursuant to this bank
credit for an amount of $18 million (2005 $21 million). The Corporation also has other
outstanding letters of credit for an amount of $3 million (2005 $5 million). A provision of $4
million (2005 $4 million) was recorded related to letters of credits.
In 2006, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings under the bank facilities ranged from 5.00%
to 6.50% (2005 from 3.21% to 7.25%).
The Corporations borrowing agreements contain restrictive covenants. In particular, the
Corporations bank facility requires compliance with certain financial ratios on a quarterly basis.
Certain debt agreements require the Corporation to indemnify the parties in the event of changes in
elements such as withholding tax regulations. As the nature and scope of such indemnifications are
contingent on future events, none of which can be foreseen as at December 31, 2006, and the
structure of such transactions makes these events unlikely, no provisions have been recorded in the
consolidated financial statements.
35
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 14. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
NORAMPAC
In December 2006, the Corporation sold its investment of Norampac Inc. The information below is
for comparative purposes relating to 2005.
Norampacs debt is non-recourse to the Corporation. The following amounts represent the
Corporations proportionate share.
UNSECURED NOTES
The 6.75% unsecured notes issued in 2003 are redeemable in whole or in part at Norampacs
option under certain conditions and subject to payment of a redemption premium.
BANK FACILITY
Norampac has a five-year secured revolving credit facility of $175 million maturing in 2008.
The revolving credit facility is secured by all the inventories and receivables of Norampac Inc.
and its North American subsidiaries and by property, plant and equipment at two of its
containerboard mills and three of its converting facilities. Also, this facility requires
compliance with certain covenants. As at December 31, 2005, the Corporations proportionate share
of assets secured under this revolving credit facility relating to receivables, inventories and
property, plant and equipment amounted to $98 million, $69 million and $223 million, respectively.
Borrowings under this credit facility bear interest at floating rates plus a borrowing margin based
on Norampacs credit rating. Standby fees are payable on Norampacs available unused credit lines
at an annual rate that varies according to Norampacs credit rating.
As at December 31, 2005, $58 million of borrowings under the secured revolving credit facility were
outstanding. In addition, as at December 31, 2005, Norampac had outstanding letters of credit
pursuant to this bank credit for an amount of $4 million. No provision was recorded related to
outstanding letters of credits.
In 2005, the interest rates on outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility ranged
from 3.44% to 5.56%.
36
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 15.
OTHER LIABILITIES AND DEFERRED CREDITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability other employee future benefit plans (Note 21) |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
Accrued benefit liability defined benefit pension plans (Note 21) |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
Provision for environment and other asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gain on contribution of net assets to Norampac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Deferred net gain on early settlements of interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Deferred foreign exchange gain on translation of long-term debt (a) |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Investment tax credits and other |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) In 2006, $7 million of the gain was recognized to earnings and the remaining $41 million
will be recognized to earnings in 2016.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The asset retirement obligations are principally linked to landfill capping obligations,
asbestos removal obligations and demolition of certain abandoned buildings. As at December 31,
2006, Domtar has estimated the net present value of its asset retirement obligations to be $21
million (2005 $23 million); the present value was based on probability weighted undiscounted cash
outflow of $50 million (2005 $41 million). The majority of asset retirement obligations are
estimated to be settled prior to December 31, 2025. However, some settlement scenarios call for
obligations to be settled as late as December 31, 2046. Domtars credit adjusted risk-free rates
were used to calculate the net present value of the asset retirement obligations. The rates used
vary between 4.50% and 9.40%, based on the prevailing rate at the moment of recognition of the
liability and on its settlement period.
37
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 15. OTHER LIABILITIES AND DEFERRED CREDITS (CONTINUED)
The following table reconciles Domtars asset retirement obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of year |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Liabilities incurred during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Revisions to estimated cash flows |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Revisions to estimated cash flows related to restructurings (Note 5) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Discontinued operations (Note 4) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations, end of year |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 16.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
ENVIRONMENT
Domtar is subject to environmental laws and regulations enacted by federal, provincial, state
and local authorities.
In 2006, Domtars operating expenditures for environmental matters, as described in Note 1,
amounted to $60 million (2005 $68 million; 2004 $69 million).
Domtar made capital expenditures for environmental matters of $9 million in 2006 (2005 $17
million; 2004 $22 million) for the improvement of air emissions, effluent treatment and remedial
actions to address environmental compliance. At this time, Domtar cannot reasonably estimate the
additional capital expenditures that may be required. However, management expects any additional
required expenditure would not have a material adverse effect on Domtars financial position,
earnings or cash flows.
Domtar continues to take remedial action under its Care and Control Program at a number of former
operating sites, especially in the wood preserving sector, due to possible soil, sediment or
groundwater contamination. The investigation and remediation process is lengthy and subject to the
uncertainties of changes in legal requirements, technological developments and the allocation of
liability among potentially responsible parties.
While Domtar believes that it has determined the costs for environmental matters likely to be
incurred based on known information, Domtars ongoing efforts to identify potential environmental
concerns that may be associated with its properties may lead to future environmental
investigations. These efforts may result in the determination of additional environmental costs and
liabilities, which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
As at December 31, 2006, Domtar had a provision of $54 million (2005 $63 million) for
environmental matters and other asset retirement obligations. Additional costs, not known or
identifiable, could be incurred for remediation efforts. Based on policies and procedures in place
to monitor environmental exposure, management believes that such additional remediation costs would
not have a material adverse effect on Domtars financial position, earnings or cash flows.
In addition, the pulp and paper industry in the United States is subject to Boiler Maximum
Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Rules that further regulate effluent and air emissions. Domtar
complies with all present regulations and anticipates spending approximately $4 million over the
next year to meet such requirements.
39
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
As at December 31, 2006, anticipated undiscounted payments in each of the next five years were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Environmental provision and
other asset retirement obligations |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Boiler MACT Rules |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of operations, Domtar becomes involved in various legal actions mostly
related to contract disputes, patent infringements, environmental and product warranty claims, and
labour issues. While the final outcome with respect to actions outstanding or pending as at
December 31, 2006, cannot be predicted with certainty, it is managements opinion that their
resolution will not have a material adverse effect on Domtars financial position, earnings or cash
flows.
E.B. EDDY ACQUISITION
On July 31, 1998, the Corporation acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of E.B.
Eddy Limited and E.B. Eddy Paper, Inc. (E.B. Eddy), an integrated producer of specialty paper and
wood products. The purchase agreement includes a purchase price adjustment whereby, in the event of
the acquisition by a third party of more than 50% of the shares of the Corporation in specified
circumstances, the Corporation may have had to pay up to a maximum of $120 million, an amount which
is gradually declining over a 25-year period. As at December 31, 2006, the maximum amount of the
purchase price adjustment was $110 million. No provision was recorded for this potential purchase
price adjustment.
LEASE AND OTHER COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The Corporation has entered into operating leases for property, plant and equipment. The
Corporation also has commitments to purchase property, plant and equipment, roundwood, wood chips,
gas, electricity and certain chemicals. Minimum future payments under these operating leases and
other commercial commitments, determined as at December 31, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Other commercial commitments |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
Total operating lease expense amounted to $28 million in 2006 (2005 $35 million; 2004 $38
million).
40
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
GUARANTEES
INDEMNIFICATIONS
In the normal course of business, the Corporation offers indemnifications relating to the sale
of its businesses and real estate. In general, these indemnifications may relate to claims from
past business operations, the failure to abide by covenants and the breach of representations and
warranties included in the sales agreements. Typically, such representations and warranties relate
to taxation, environmental, product and employee matters. The terms of these indemnification
agreements are generally for an unlimited period of time. As at December 31, 2006, the Corporation
is unable to estimate the potential maximum liabilities for these types of indemnification
guarantees as the amounts are contingent upon the outcome of future events, the nature and
likelihood of which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no provisions have
been recorded. These indemnifications have not yielded significant expenses in the past.
41
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17.
STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
PREFERRED SHARES
The outstanding preferred shares at December 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
$ |
|
Preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A |
|
|
|
67,476 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
68,176 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Series B |
|
|
|
1,230,000 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authorized preferred shares consist of preferred shares issuable in an unlimited number of
series, ranking equal with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets.
The Series A Preferred shares are non-voting and redeemable at the Corporations option at $25.00
per share since April 1, 1994. These shares carry a cumulative cash dividend per share of $2.25 per
annum.
The Series B Preferred shares are non-voting and redeemable at the Corporations option at $25.00
per share. These shares carry a cumulative cash dividend equivalent to 72% of the bank prime rate.
The Corporation has undertaken to make all reasonable efforts to purchase quarterly, for
cancellation, 1% of the number of Series A and Series B Preferred shares outstanding on April 2,
1992, at prices not exceeding $25.00 per share. In connection therewith, preferred shares purchased
for cancellation were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
per share |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
per share |
|
|
of shares |
|
|
per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
Series A |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
25.05 |
|
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
20.91 |
|
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
22.57 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
24.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17. STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
COMMON SHARES
The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares. In 2006, no cash
dividend has been declared on these shares (2005 $0.18 per share; 2004 $0.24 per share). The
changes in the number of outstanding common shares and their aggregate stated value from January 1,
2004 to December 31, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
$ |
|
|
of shares |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
|
230,967,490 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
|
230,237,356 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
228,860,806 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option
and share purchase plans |
|
|
|
609,212 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
730,134 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,376,550 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance before share
purchase financing
agreements |
|
|
|
231,576,702 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
|
230,967,490 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
230,237,356 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
Share purchase financing
agreements |
|
|
|
(828,755 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
(845,770 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(947,105 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
230,747,947 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
|
230,121,720 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
229,290,251 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common
share at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share is the sum of the stated value of common shares, contributed surplus,
retained earnings and accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments divided by the number of
common shares outstanding at year-end.
As at December 31, 2006, the Corporation had a receivable from its employees of $12 million (2005
$12 million; 2004 $13 million) related to share purchase loans granted to them. These shares are
held in trust as security for the loans that are interest bearing at the dividend rate and with
defined repayment terms not exceeding 10 years. At the end of the year, there were 828,755 shares
(2005 845,770 shares; 2004 947,105 shares) held in trust in respect to employee loans for which
the market value was $9.85 (2005 $6.71; 2004 $14.50) per share. These loans were included as a
reduction of Common shares.
43
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17. STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN
The Restricted Stock Plan (RSP), was introduced in 2005. Under the RSP, Domtars common shares
may be granted to executive and other key employees. The Corporation or a trustee selected by the
Corporation in its discretion will acquire, on the secondary market, the number of common shares
granted. The common shares granted pursuant to the RSP shall be held in trust for the benefit of
the participant with a trust company for a period which may not exceed three years from the date of
each grant. At the end of the restricted period, and provided that the participant has remained in
continuous employment with the Corporation since the date of grant, the participant will be
entitled to receive a share certificate representing 1) the number of shares of the initial grant,
and 2) the additional shares accumulated in the participants account by reinvestment of dividends,
if any. During the restricted period, no participant shall be entitled to exercise voting rights or
any other rights attaching to the ownership of the shares, nor shall any participant be considered
the beneficial owner of any shares until they become fully vested upon termination of the
applicable restricted period.
During 2006, 341,765 common shares were acquired and are held in trust pursuant to the RSP (2005
394,080). The total expense recognized in Domtars results of operations related to these common
shares amounted to $2 million in 2006 (2005 $1 million).
EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTION AND SHARE PURCHASE PLAN
Under the Executive Stock Option and Share Purchase Plan (Plan), options may be granted to
selected eligible employees. Options are granted at a price equal to the market value on the day
immediately preceding the date the options were granted and generally expire 10 years after the
date of the grant. Normally, one quarter of the options may be exercised at each anniversary date
of the grant. In 2005, the rights feature of the Plan was eliminated. Previously granted rights
were not affected by this measure. The actual granted rights permit eligible employees to purchase
shares at 90% of the quoted market value on the day immediately preceding the date the rights were
granted, and provide for a one-for-four bonus share to be issued on the third anniversary date of
the grant of the rights.
In 2005, a new feature was introduced to the Plan for all grants starting with 2005 going-forward.
Options granted before 2005 are not affected by this new feature. Pursuant to this new feature, the
granted stock options will vest in four increments of 25% on each anniversary date of the grant.
When vested, the relevant annual portion will be available for exercise provided the price of
Domtars common shares on the exercise date has increased by at least 20% over the grant price.
Upon exercise, 60% of the difference between the fair market value of Domtars common shares at the
time of exercise and the grant price must be converted in common share of Domtar which must be held
by the participant for at least 12 months after the date of exercise. Any annual portion that has
not been exercised on or before the expiry date of the option will automatically lapse on such
expiry date. The option has been granted for a period of six years, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Plan.
44
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17. STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
In 2003, a new performance feature was introduced to the Plan for all grants starting with 2003
going-forward. Options granted before 2003 are not affected by this new feature. Pursuant to this
new feature, the granted stock options will vest in four increments of 25% on each anniversary date
of the grant, provided the performance of Domtars common share price is equal to or exceeds the
average performance of an index composed of the S&P 500 Materials (U.S.) index (50%) and the
S&P/TSX Materials (Canada) index (50%). On each anniversary date of the grant, the average closing
price of Domtars common shares, during the 20 consecutive trading days on the Toronto Stock
Exchange immediately preceding each anniversary date of the grant, is used to measure the
performance of Domtars common share price and is compared to the average performance of the index
during the same reference period. The relevant annual portion only vests on a given anniversary
date if the performance of Domtars common share price equals or exceeds the average index during
the relevant reference period. Should this not be the case, the annual portion will not vest but
may vest on any following anniversary date if the foregoing test, applied on a cumulative basis, is
satisfied on a subsequent anniversary date over the vesting period of four years. Any annual
portion which has not vested on or before the end of the vesting period of the option will
automatically lapse on the expiry date. The new performance options have a term of 10 years and
will expire in February 2013.
In June 2001, 1,050,000 stock options were granted to members of the Management Committee. Pursuant
to this grant, and except in certain specified circumstances, there was no prorata or early vesting
prior to January 1, 2004, at which time the options became fully vested if the holder of the
options was still an employee of Domtar. After vesting, the options may not be exercised unless
both of the following two conditions have been met: 1) at any time between January 1, 2001 and
December 31, 2003, the weighted average trading price of the Domtars common shares during 20
consecutive trading days on the Toronto Stock Exchange has reached or exceeded $16.70, $18.51 or
$20.32, whereupon 25%, 50% or 100%, respectively, of the options granted become exercisable; and 2)
the appreciation in the market value of the Domtars common shares between January 1, 2001 and the
exercise date is equal to or exceeds the increase in the Standard & Poors U.S. Paper & Forest
Products index during the same period. As at December 31, 2006, only 14% of the options are
exercisable, provided the above-mentioned conditions are met, and the remaining 86% have been
cancelled, as the objectives of the program have not been attained.
The fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Annual dividends per shares (in dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Expected lives (years) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
Estimated realization percentage-performance options |
|
|
84.5 |
% |
|
|
61.4 |
% |
|
|
69.8 |
% |
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year
(in dollars per option) |
|
$ |
5.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
$ |
3.68 |
|
|
45
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17. STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
Changes in the number of options outstanding were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
price |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
price |
|
|
of options |
|
|
price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
|
4,833,126 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
|
5,306,553 |
|
|
|
14.83 |
|
|
|
5,688,264 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
528,250 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
|
495,250 |
|
|
|
11.44 |
|
|
|
1,266,000 |
|
|
|
15.53 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,847 |
) |
|
|
11.12 |
|
|
|
(540,270 |
) |
|
|
11.57 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
(515,218 |
) |
|
|
14.45 |
|
|
|
|
(946,830 |
) |
|
|
15.44 |
|
|
|
(1,107,441 |
) |
|
|
14.08 |
|
Expired |
|
|
|
(321,301 |
) |
|
|
11.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
|
4,524,857 |
|
|
|
13.62 |
|
|
|
|
4,833,126 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
5,306,553 |
|
|
|
14.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end
of year |
|
|
|
2,171,257 |
|
|
|
14.27 |
|
|
|
|
2,424,793 |
|
|
|
13.77 |
|
|
|
2,287,587 |
|
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the information about options outstanding and exercisable as at
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
|
Options exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
average |
|
Range of exercise prices |
|
of options |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
of options |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
$6.23 - $9.18 |
|
|
512,250 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
9.18 |
|
$9.19 - $13.26 |
|
|
1,306,382 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
11.60 |
|
|
|
925,882 |
|
|
|
11.66 |
|
$13.27 - $16.52 |
|
|
2,706,225 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
15.98 |
|
|
|
1,234,375 |
|
|
|
16.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,524,857 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
13.62 |
|
|
|
2,171,257 |
|
|
|
14.27 |
|
|
46
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17. STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
During the year, no shares (2005 nil; 2004 353,900) were issued pursuant to the exercise of
rights and 61,425 bonus shares (2005 70,393; 2004 52,730) were issued. The total expense
recognized in Domtars results of operations related to these rights and bonus shares amounted to
$3 million in 2006 (2005 $4 million; 2004 $2 million). As at December 31, 2006, 80,000 bonus
shares could be issued over the next year.
As at December 31, 2006, 16,000,000 common shares (2005 16,000,000; 2004 16,000,000) were
authorized for issuance under the Plan. Since its inception, 6,119,260 shares have been issued
under this plan. These common shares are issued from treasury.
During the year, under the Executive Stock Option and Share Purchase Plan and the Employee Share
Purchase Plan, as described below, $3 million (2005 $5 million; 2004 $4 million) was included
in Contributed surplus in conjunction with the recognition of stock-based compensation expense.
The total compensation cost related to non-vested Executive Stock Option and Shares Purchase Plans
not yet recognized is $2 million as at December 31, 2006. The weighted average period over which
this cost is expected to be recognized is one year.
DEFERRED SHARE UNIT PLANS
OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
Under the Deferred Share Unit Plan for Outside Directors of the Corporation, deferred share
units (DSUs), equivalent in value to a common share, may be granted to eligible directors. In
addition, participants may elect to receive their annual retainer and attendance fees in DSUs. A
participant shall receive, not later than the 31st of January following the end of the year during
which the participant ceases to be a member of the Board of Directors, a lump sum payment in cash
equal to the number of DSUs recorded in the participants account on the termination date
multiplied by the termination date value of the common shares or, if the participant so elects, a
number of common shares to be purchased on the open market equal to the number of DSUs then
recorded in the participants account less, in either case, any applicable withholding tax. A
participant account shall be credited with dividend equivalents in the form of additional DSUs when
normal cash dividends are paid on common shares. Upon payment in full of the DSUs, they shall be
cancelled. The total expense (reversal) recognized in Domtars results of operations amounted to
$1.9 million in 2006 (2005 $(0.3) million; 2004 $0.4 million). In 2006, 116,644 DSUs (2005
99,389; 2004 37,940) were issued and no DSUs (2005 nil; 2004 45,334) were redeemed. As at
December 31, 2006, 346,166 DSUs (2005 229,523; 2004 130,134) were outstanding.
47
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 17. STATED CAPITAL AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
EXECUTIVES
Under the Executive Deferred Share Unit Plan of the Corporation, DSUs may be granted to
eligible executives. A participant shall receive, no later than the 31st of January following the
end of the year during which occurred the participants date of retirement, death, determination of
long-term disability or termination of employment at the end of a continuous period that started on
or after January 1, 1999 and represents at least seven years of tenure as a member of the
Management Committee, a lump sum payment in cash equal to the number of DSUs recorded in the
participants account on one of these dates multiplied by the redemption value of the common shares
or, if the participant so elects, a number of common shares to be purchased on the open market
equal to the number of DSUs then recorded in the participants account less, in either case, any
applicable withholding tax. A participant account shall be credited with dividend equivalents in
the form of additional DSUs when normal cash dividends are paid on common shares. Upon payment in
full of the DSUs, they shall be cancelled. In 2005, the Executive Deferred Share Unit Plan was
eliminated. Previously granted DSUs are not affected by this change. The total expense (reversal)
recognized in Domtars results of operation amounted to $0.2 million in 2006 (2005 $(0.5)
million; 2004 $(0.6) million). As at December 31, 2006, 46,128 DSUs (2005 56,443; 2004
66,178) were outstanding under this plan.
Under the Executive Performance Share Unit Plan approved in December 2003, Performance Share Units
(PSUs) may be granted to eligible executives and other key employees of Domtar or any of its
affiliates. Each PSUs, subject to the vesting conditions (including certain conditions relating to
the relative performance of the Domtars common shares) set out in each grant being fulfilled,
gives a participant the right to receive one common share of Domtar or, at his option, the cash
equivalent at the time of vesting. In the event a participant elects to receive common shares,
Domtar will make arrangements for delivery of such shares through purchases on the open market then
recorded in the participants account less, in either case, any applicable withholding tax. A
participant account shall be credited with dividend equivalents in the form of additional PSUs when
normal cash dividends are paid on common shares. The total expense recognized in Domtars results
of operations amounted to $0.1 million in 2006 (2005 $0.1 million; 2004 $0.1 million),
representing 551,497 (2005 740,812; 2004 725,989) units authorized and issued since the
inception of the plan. In February 2007, 504,044 PSUs were cancelled.
EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLANS
Under the Employee Share Purchase Plans, all employees are eligible to purchase common shares
at a price of 90% of the quoted market value. Common shares are purchased under the plans on
monthly investment dates. Shares purchased under the Canadian plan are subject to a mandatory
twelve-month holding period. Employees who hold the shares for 18 months following the date of
acquisition (U.S. plan) or who hold the shares purchased in any calendar year until June 30 of the
following year (Canadian plan) are entitled to receive additional common shares equivalent to 10%
of the cost of such shares. As at December 31, 2006, 6,050,000 common shares (2005 6,050,000;
2004 6,050,000) were authorized for issuance under the plans. During the year, 547,787 common
shares (2005 637,894; 2004 421,825) were issued under the plans at an average price of $7.12
(2005 $9.08; 2004 $15.77) per share. Since their inception, 5,687,049 shares have been issued
under these plans.
48
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 18.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
value |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
amount |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the long-term debt, including the portion due within one year, is principally
based on quoted market prices.
Due to their short-term maturity, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables,
bank indebtedness, trade and other payables and income and other taxes approximate their fair
values.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Domtar is exposed to interest rate risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates on its cash
and cash equivalents, its bank indebtedness, its bank credit facility and its long-term debt.
Domtar may manage this interest rate exposure by the use of derivative instruments such as interest
rate swap contracts.
In 2004, the Corporation terminated, prior to maturity, interest rate swap contracts for net cash
proceeds of $20 million (US$15 million). The resulting gain of $17 million recorded under Other
liabilities and deferred credits was deferred and is recognized against financing expenses over
the period ending November 2013, the term of the underlying 5.375% notes.
In 2002, the Corporation terminated, prior to maturity, interest rate swap contracts for net cash
proceeds of $40 million (US$26 million). The net gain of $40 million recorded under Other
liabilities and deferred credits was deferred and is recognized against financing expenses over
the period of the interest rate payments ending October 2003 and October 2006, the original
designated hedging period of the underlying 7.875% notes. In 2006, the net amount of $10 million
(2005 $13 million) was recognized against Financing expenses.
CREDIT RISK
Domtar is exposed to credit risk on the accounts receivable from its customers. In order to
reduce this risk, Domtar reviews new customers credit histories before granting credit and
conducts regular reviews of existing customers credit performance. As at December 31, 2006, one of
Domtars paper segment customers located in the United States represented 5% ($16 million) (2005
4% ($18 million)) of the receivables, prior to the effect of the receivables securitization.
Domtar is also exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to its
financial instruments. Domtar minimizes this exposure by entering into contracts with
counterparties that are believed to be of high credit quality. Collateral or other security to
support financial instruments subject to credit risk is usually not obtained. The credit standing
of counterparties is regularly monitored.
49
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 18. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
In order to reduce the potential negative effects of a fluctuating Canadian dollar, Domtar has
entered into various arrangements to stabilize anticipated future net cash inflows denominated in
U.S. dollars. The following table provides the detail of the arrangements used as hedging
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Average exchange rate |
|
|
Contractual amounts |
|
|
|
(CAN$/US$) |
|
|
(In millions of U.S. dollars) |
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
Currency options purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 12 months |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 12 months |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts are contracts whereby Domtar has the obligation to sell U.S.
dollars at a specific rate.
Currency options purchased are contracts whereby Domtar has the right, but not the obligation, to
sell U.S. dollars at the strike rate if the U.S. dollar trades below that rate. Currency options
sold are contracts whereby Domtar has the obligation to sell U.S. dollars at the strike rate if the
U.S. dollar trades above that rate.
The fair value of derivative financial instruments generally reflects the estimated amounts that
Domtar would receive or pay to settle the contracts at December 31, 2006 and 2005. As at these
dates, the spot exchange rates were $1.17 and $1.17, respectively, and the fair value of the above
derivative financial instruments used as hedging items was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Unrealized gains on forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, in 2006, the Corporation entered into forward foreign exchange swap contracts of
US$490 million to manage the effects of a fluctuating Canadian dollar for a period ending January
2007. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and they are accounted for at their
fair value. The fair value of these instruments as at December 31, 2006 represented an unrealized
loss of $3 million included in Selling, general and administration expenses.
50
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 18. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
PRICE RISK
In 2006, the Corporation entered into cash settled commodity swap agreements to manage price
risk associated with purchases of bunker oil covering a period starting January 2007 and ending
December 2007. These agreements fix the purchase price of bunker oil for 10,000 barrels per month.
These agreements are in addition to the 2005 and 2004 contracts, which fix the purchase price of
bunker oil for 20,000 and 7,000 barrels per month, respectively, ending December 2006. These
contracts are designated as hedging instruments and hedge approximately 12% of estimated bunker oil
purchases of 2007. The fair value of these instruments as at December 31, 2006 represented an
unrealized loss of $1 million (2005 unrealized gain of $1 million).
During 2004, the Corporation entered into a cash settled commodity swap agreement to manage price
risk associated with sales of NBSK pulp covering a period starting July 2004 and ending June 2007.
The agreement fixes the sale price of NBSK pulp for 1,000 tonnes per month for 36 months. This
agreement is in addition to the 2003 and 2002 contracts, which fix the sale price of NBSK pulp for
1,500 tonnes per month for 36 months and expired in April 2006 and October 2005, respectively.
These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments and they are accounted for at their fair
value. The fair value of these remaining instruments as at December 31, 2006, was negative $1
million (2005 negative $1 million).
51
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 19.
ACCUMULATED FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Disposal of business (Note 4) |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of changes in exchange rates during the year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On net investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
On certain
long-term debt denominated in foreign currencies designated as a hedge of net
investment in self-sustaining foreign subsidiaries |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Future income taxes thereon |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 20.
INTERESTS IN JOINT VENTURES
The following amounts represent the Corporations proportionate interests in its joint ventures
(Anthony-Domtar Inc. and Gogama Forest Products Inc.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Long-term assets |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Norampac (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Norampac (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Financing expenses |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net earnings (loss) from Norampac, excluding gain on disposal (Note 4) |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided from (used for) operating activities |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Cash flows used for investing activities |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Cash flows provided from (used for) financing activities |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Cash flows provided from Norampac (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 21.
PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS
Domtar contributes to several defined contribution, multi-employer and 401(k) plans. The
pension expense under these plans is equal to Domtars contribution. The 2006 pension expense was
$15 million (2005 $17 million; 2004 $17 million) ($4 million related to discontinued operations
(2005 $4 million; 2004 $4 million)).
DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
Domtar has several defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all employees,
including one closed plan for certain non-unionized employees in Canada. Non-unionized employees in
Canada joining Domtar after June 1, 2000 participate in defined contribution plans. The defined
benefit plans are generally contributory in Canada and non-contributory in the United States. The
pension expense and the obligation related to the defined benefit plans are actuarially determined
using managements most probable assumptions.
In 2006, pursuant to the decision in November 2005 to close the Cornwall and Ottawa, Ontario paper
mills, the Corporation has declared a partial wind-up of the non-unionized and unionized plans
related to the Ontario participants in the plan.
OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS
The post-retirement and post-employment plans are unfunded.
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
Other employee future benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Service cost for the year |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Plan amendments |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Curtailment and settlement loss (gain) (Note 5) |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs arising in the period |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference between costs arising in the period and
costs recognized in the period in respect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on plan assets |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Plan amendments |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost, related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Discontinued operations (Note 4) |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 21. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
Domtars funding policy is to contribute annually the amount required to provide for benefits
earned in the year and to fund past service obligations over periods not exceeding those permitted
by the applicable regulatory authorities. Past service obligations primarily arise from
improvements to plan benefits.
The latest actuarial valuations were conducted as at:
- |
|
March 31, 2006, for plans representing approximately 74% of the total plans asset fair value, |
|
- |
|
December 31, 2005, for plans representing approximately 20% of the total plans asset fair value, |
|
- |
|
January 1, 2006, for plans representing approximately 5% of the total plans asset fair value, |
|
- |
|
January 1, 2004, for plans representing approximately 1% of the total plans asset fair value. |
These valuations indicated a funding deficiency. The next actuarial valuations will be
completed between December 31, 2006 and January 1, 2009. Domtar expects to contribute a total
amount of $88 million in 2007 compared to $86 million in 2006 (2005 $85 million; 2004 $80
million) to the pension plans. The contributions made in 2006 to the other employee future benefit
plans amounted to $7 million (2005 $9 million; 2004 $8 million).
CHANGE IN ACCRUED BENEFIT OBLIGATION
The following table represents the change in the accrued benefit obligation as determined by
independent actuaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
Other employee future benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Accrued benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
Service cost for the year |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Plan participants contributions |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Plan amendments |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Disposal of business (Note 4) |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit obligation at end of year |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 21. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS
The following table represents the change in the fair value of assets reflecting the actual
return on plan assets, the contributions and the benefits paid during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
Other employee future benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Fair value of assets at beginning of year |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Plan participants contributions |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Disposal of business (Note 4) |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets at end of year |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF ASSETS OF THE PENSION PLANS
The assets of the pension plans are held by a number of independent trustees and are accounted
for separately in the Domtar pension funds. The investment strategy for the assets in the pension
plans is to maintain a diversified portfolio of assets, invested in a prudent manner to maintain
the security of funds while maximizing returns within the guidelines provided in the investment
policy. The Corporations pension funds are not permitted to own any of the Corporations shares or
debt instruments. The target asset allocation is based on the expected duration of the benefit
obligation, which includes the impact of a partial wind-up related to the mill closures.
The following table shows the allocation of the plan assets, based on the fair value of the assets
held at December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the target allocation for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
|
Percentage plan assets as at |
|
|
|
allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
58% - 68 |
% |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
32% - 42 |
% |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domtar has indemnified and held harmless the trustees of Domtar pension funds, and the
respective officers, directors, employees and agents of such trustees, from any and all costs and
expenses arising out of the performance of their obligations under the relevant trust agreements,
including in respect of their reliance on authorized instructions of Domtar or for failing to act
in the absence of authorized
instructions. These indemnifications survive the termination of such agreements. As at December 31,
2006, Domtar has not recorded a liability associated with these indemnifications, as Domtar does
not expect to make any payments pertaining to these indemnifications.
56
DOMTAR INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2006
(IN MILLIONS OF CANADIAN DOLLARS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
NOTE 21. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEE FUTURE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDED STATUS TO AMOUNTS RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The following tables present the difference between the fair value of assets and the
actuarially determined accrued benefit obligation as at December 31, 2006 and 2005. This difference
is also referred to as either the deficit or surplus, as the case may be, or the funded status of
the plans.
The tables further reconcile the amount of the surplus or deficit (funded status) to the net amount
recognized in the Consolidated balance sheets. This difference between the funded status and the
net amount recognized in the Consolidated balance sheets represents the portion of the surplus or
deficit not yet recognized for accounting purposes. Deferred recognition is a guiding principle of
these recommendations. This approach allows for a gradual recognition of changes in accrued benefit
obligations and plan performance over the expected average remaining service life of the employee
group covered by the plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plans |
|
|
|
Other employee future benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Accrued benefit obligation at end of year |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
Fair value of assets at end of year |
|
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|