1.
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
2.
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
3.
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
4.
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of
transaction:
|
5.
|
Total
fee paid:
|
¨
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary
materials.
|
¨
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
6.
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
7.
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement
No.:
|
8.
|
Filing
Party:
|
9.
|
Date
Filed:
|
·
|
We
do not believe the tender offer should be characterized as a
“repricing.” We recognize that the repricing of options is
inherently dilutive to stockholders, and repricing is expressly prohibited
under the terms of our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. By contrast,
the tender offer was an anti-dilutive measure that reduced the number of
outstanding options by approximately 30%. Employees choosing to
tender options did not, and will not, receive new grants intended to
replace the tendered options. In fact, we expect to grant
substantially fewer options overall in 2009 compared to
2008.
|
·
|
In
crafting the tender offer, the board was careful to offer prices that
would ensure a healthy level of participation without
overpaying. To that end, all prices offered were below the
Black-Scholes values of the options at the time of the
offer. In the end, less than half of the eligible options were
actually tendered – an indication that the pricing was not overly
generous.
|
·
|
The
tender offer was important for employee morale and
retention. At the time of the tender offer, not only had
virtually all of our outstanding options fallen well out of the money, but
we had also implemented a salary freeze, suspended 401(k) profit-sharing
contributions, eliminated bonuses, curtailed a number of employee benefits
and eliminated a small number of positions in response to the drastic
downturn in demand for semiconductor products in late
2008.
|
·
|
Stock-based
compensation expenses associated with the tendered options were
accelerated into the fourth quarter of 2008, removing approximately $2
million per quarter from our ongoing run rate of GAAP operating
expenses.
|
·
|
Submission
of the tender offer for a stockholder vote was not practicable as it would
have required a costly special
meeting.
|