Edgar Filing: ICEWEB INC

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended June 30, 2011

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission file number: 0-27865

ICEWEB, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Delaware

13-2640971

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

22900 Shaw Road, Suite 111

Sterling, VA 20166

(Address of principal executive offices)

(571) 287-2380

(Issuer’s telephone number)

______________________

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: At August 15, 2011, there were 147,693,884 outstanding shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes o No x

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. You should not unduly rely on these statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “project,” “contemplate,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” With respect to any forward-looking statement that includes a statement of its underlying assumptions or bases, we believe such assumptions or bases to be reasonable and have formed them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material depending on the circumstances. When, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results, that expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the stated expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or anyone acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

When used in this quarterly report, the terms “IceWEB”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, and “us” refers to IceWEB, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and our subsidiaries. The information which appears on our web site at www.iceweb.com is not part of this quarterly report.

- 2 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2011

INDEX


		Page

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1 - Consolidated Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010	4

	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	6

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	7

	Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	20

	Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28

	Item 4 - Controls and Procedures	29

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	29

	Item 1A - Risk Factors	29

	Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29

	Item 3 - Default upon Senior Securities	30

	Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	30

	Item 5 - Other Information	30

	Item 6 – Exhibits	30

	Signatures	31

- 3 -

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

ICEWEB, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	June 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
	(Unaudited)			(1)
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	4,184		$	540,156
Accounts receivable, net		1,777,160			1,466,483
Inventory		73,163			62,197
Other current assets		15,650			6,875
Prepaid expenses		36,046			31,230
Total Current Assets		1,906,203			2,106,941

OTHER ASSETS:
Property and equipment, net		242,628			418,873
Deposits		13,320			13,320
Marketable securities		140,800			524,800
Intangible assets, net		364,632			546,952
Total Assets	$	2,667,583		$	3,610,886


CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,587,217		$	1,648,252
Notes payable		1,871,408			1,649,140
Deferred revenue		14,904			59,582
Total Liabilities		3,473,529			3,356,974

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Series B convertible preferred stock ($.001 par value; 626,667 shares issued and outstanding)		626			626
Common stock ($.001 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 146,661,939 shares issued and 146,499,439 shares outstanding and 134,443,725 and 134,281,225 issued and outstanding, respectively)		146,501			134,445
Additional paid in capital		31,261,249			29,360,833
Accumulated deficit		(32,211,122	)		(29,622,792	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		92,800			476,800
Subscription receivable		(83,000	)		(83,000	)
Treasury stock, at cost, (162,500 shares)		(13,000	)		(13,000	)

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(805,946	)		253,912

Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity (Deficit)	$	2,667,583		$	3,610,886

(1) Derived from audited financial statements

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 4 -

ICEWEB, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Sales	$	719,727		$	1,203,878		$	2,514,164		$	2,815,900

Cost of sales		380,784			613,287			1,317,299			1,343,006

Gross profit		338,943			590,591			1,196,865			1,472,894

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		123,955			404,443			898,299			1,189,661
Depreciation and amortization expense		124,831			165,585			418,625			495,984
Research and development expense		187,810			167,061			547,579			353,092
General and administrative		495,963			1,130,005			1,617,786			3,783,654

Total Operating Expenses		932,559			1,867,094			3,482,289			5,822,391

Loss from operations		(593,616	)		(1,276,503	)		(2,285,424	)		(4,349,497	)

Other expense:
Interest expense		(104,653	)		(147,240	)		(302,908	)		(422,196	)
Total other expenses:		(104,653	)		(147,240	)		(302,908	)		(422,196	)

Net loss	$	(698,269	)	$	(1,423,743	)	$	(2,588,332	)	$	(4,771,693	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		143,553,735			110,570,437			140,673,273			92,635,584

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 5 -

ICEWEB, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	(1,827,791	)	$	(2,900,065	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Investment in marketable securities		—			(48,000	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(60,061	)		(85,624	)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(60,061	)		(133,624	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of restricted common stock		409,464			2,320,630
Proceeds from notes payable		818,481			985,900
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options		720,148			1,898,374
Payments on notes payable		(596,213	)		(957,662	)

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,351,880			4,247,242

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(535,972	)		1,213,553

CASH - beginning of period		540,156			63,310

CASH - end of period	$	4,184		$	1,276,863

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for :
Interest	$	198,225		$	402,056
Income taxes		—			—

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 6 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS

Headquartered just outside of Washington, D.C., we manufacture and market Unified data storage, purpose built appliances, network and cloud attached storage solutions and deliver on-line cloud computing application services. Our customer base includes U.S. government agencies, enterprise companies, and small to medium sized businesses (SMB).

A unified storage system simultaneously enables storage of file data and handles the block-based I/O (input/output) of enterprise applications. We believe one advantage of unified storage is reduced hardware requirements. Instead of separate storage platforms, like NAS for file-based storage and a RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) disk array for block-based storage, unified storage combines both modes in a single device. Alternatively, a single device could be deployed for either file or block storage as required.

In addition to lower capital expenditures for the enterprise, unified storage systems can also be simpler to manage than separate products. The IceWEB Storage System offers one platform for file and block data of all kinds. The IceWEB Storage System is an all-inclusive storage management system which includes de-duplication; unlimited snapshots; thin provisioning; local or remote, real-time or scheduled replication; capacity and utilization reporting, and integration with virtual server environments. Unified storage systems enjoy the same level of reliability as dedicated file or block storage systems.

We generate revenues from the manufacture and sale of high-performance unified data storage products, data storage appliances and servers, and the sale of software services.

IceWEB Storage Systems

IceWEB is a provider of high performance Unified Network Storage solutions. Our product offerings have broad appeal in the small to medium enterprise (SME) and federal marketplaces, and are used as core building blocks (enabling technologies) within business critical storage infrastructure for a diverse group of data-intensive key vertical market segments such as geospatial information systems, entertainment, security and defense, higher education, Internet Service Providers (ISP’s), Managed Service Providers (MSP’s), oil and gas, and health care. Our innovative storage systems deliver levels of performance, scalability, versatility and simplicity that exceed existing network storage alternatives at a significantly lower price point. Our Unified Network Storage offering is deployed as storage operating system software on our Network-Attached Storage (NAS) and Storage Area Network (SAN) systems. This IceWEB Unified Network Storage environment empowers companies to quickly and easily deploy large, complex data storage infrastructure environments; to reduce administrative costs for managing their storage by making complex technical tasks far more simple to accomplish; to reduce hardware and capital expenditure costs by more effectively using the storage within the system and repurposing older legacy hardware; to protect their business critical data by leveraging the IceWEB 5000 built-in data replication features; and to integrate with the leading server virtualization software (VMware, Citrix Xen and Microsoft’s HyperV) to better manage those solutions.

The IceWEB Unified Storage products replace complex and performance-limited products with high performance, scalable and easy to use systems capable of handling the most data intensive applications and environments.

Custom Built Appliances

IceWEB has been building Purpose Built Network and Data Appliances for several years. Purpose Built Network and Data Appliances are systems which provide computing resources (processors and memory), data storage, and specific software for a dedicated application. Historically, the appliance products that IceWEB has built have supported a single large business partner, ESRI Corporation. In this relationship, IceWEB and ESRI have collaborated to create a family of ultra-high performance IceWEB/ESRI Geographic Information System (GIS) appliances that give customers access to massive amounts of data with unprecedented levels of performance. IceWEB creates, builds and ships a line of GIS appliances for ESRI which includes a full set of ESRI GIS data pre-loaded on internal storage. ESRI Corporation has the responsibility for marketing these appliances to their customers and business partners via their worldwide sales and consultancy organization. IceWEB also periodically distributes updates for these GIS appliances, which is a source of recurring revenue for the Company.

- 7 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 1 - NATURE OF BUSINESS (continued)

IceWEB, in an effort to capitalize on what has been a successful model built within the Geographical Information System space, with ESRI has expanded our marketing of our appliance design, manufacturing and support capabilities to additional prospective partners. In October 2009 IceWEB, Spot Image (a large satellite GIS data provider based in France), and Google Corporation agreed that IceWEB would build an appliance to deliver GIS imagery from Spot Image satellite data, powered by Google Earth Enterprise.

Cloud Based Software and Services

IceWEB is a leading provider of on-demand, cloud-based communications services that provides network–hosted groupware, email, calendaring and collaboration functionality. Typical customers are organizations that desire to deploy Microsoft Exchange and Outlook and who want to avoid the overhead associated with procurement, maintenance and management of their own equipment and software. These cloud-based services subsequently were expanded to include IcePORTAL^TM, which provides customers with a complete Intranet portal, and IceSECURE^TM, a hosted email encryption service. Formerly referred to as “Software as a Service” (SaaS), we refer to these hosted services today as Cloud Computing or Cloud Services. The benefits of Cloud Computing are many. First, adoption of an application, infrastructure or storage environment is available on demand requiring no capital expenditures by the customer. This represents an attractive proposition from a financial perspective. Second, this model significantly diminishes the need for the customer to retain highly-paid internal technical staff to support these traditional IT functions, freeing these critical resources to focus on tasks related to the core business. Finally, the application software, hardware, and infrastructure needs of organizations are constantly growing and evolving – Cloud Computing allows ad-hoc allocation of resources, cost free software upgrades and freedom from hardware/infrastructure obsolescence.

Research and development

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related expenses, costs of prototype equipment, costs of using contractors, allocated facility and IT overhead expenses and depreciation of equipment used in research and development activities. We expense research and development costs as incurred. We intend to continue to invest significantly in our research and development efforts which we believe are essential to maintaining our competitive position.

Merger with United Strategies, Inc./ProMark

On March 4, 2011, the Company executed a definitive merger agreement with United Strategies, Inc. (“USI”). USI, along with its wholly owned subsidiary, Promark Technology, Inc. is a privately held U.S. company recognized as a well established premier value added distributor of data products and solutions.

Pursuant to the terms of the transaction, IceWEB will pay the selling shareholders of USI total consideration of approximately $10,778,950. Based on USI’s historical financial performance, it is expected to contribute approximately $100 million in revenues to IceWEB in the coming calendar year. The merger is expected to close in August, 2011.

Purchase of Interest in VOIS Inc.

As also described later in this section, in November 2009 we purchased for $48,000 an approximately 16% interest in VOIS Inc. (OTCBB: VOIS), a development stage company that operates a social commerce website where people can find and do business with buyers and sellers of on-demand work or manufacturing around the world.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-27865) for the year ended September 30, 2010 (“Form 10-K”).

- 8 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to state fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position at June 30, 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all footnote disclosures required by GAAP.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K. These financial statements consider subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Fiscal Year

The fiscal year ends on September 30. References to fiscal 2011, for example, refer to the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011.

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and deposits approximated fair value because of the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments and their market interest rates.

Marketable Securities

IceWEB accounts for the purchase of marketable equity securities in accordance with ASC 320, “Investment – Debt and Equity Securities” with any unrealized gains and losses included as a net amount as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. However, those securities may not have the trading volume to support the stock price if the Company were to sell all their shares in the open market at once, so the Company may have a loss on the sale of marketable securities even though they record marketable equity securities at the current market value.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheets and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of stock-based compensation, the allowance for inventory obsolescence and the useful life of property and equipment and intangible assets, and litigation reserves.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Inventory

Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market, on an average cost basis.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.

- 9 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets, net consists of the cost of acquired customer relationships. We capitalize and amortize the cost of acquired intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. The estimated useful life of our acquired customer relationships is five years.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to fiscal 2011 amounts.

Going Concern

The Company’s auditors stated in their report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 that the Company is dependent on outside financing and has had losses since inception that raise doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the Company had a net loss of $2,588,332 which included noncash expenses of $908,284. Cash used in operations totaled $1,827,791. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recovery and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Management has established plans intended to increase the sales of the Company’s products and services. Management intends to seek new capital from new equity securities offerings to provide funds needed to increase liquidity, fund growth, and implement its business plan. However, no assurances can be given that the Company will be able to raise any additional funds.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consists of normal trade receivables. The Company recorded a bad debt allowance of $409,000 as of June 30, 2011. Management performs ongoing evaluations of its accounts receivable. Management believes that all remaining receivables are fully collectable. Bad debt expense amounted to $100,691 and $0 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Intangible Assets

We have adopted ASC 350 for the assessment of impairment of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles on an annual basis. The potential impairment of finite life intangibles is assessed whenever events or a change in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:


·	significant underperformance relative to historical or expected projected future operating results;
·	significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;
·	significant negative industry or economic trends;
·	significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of time; and
·	our market capitalization relative to net book value.

When we determine that the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite life intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any potential impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model.

- 10 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment” (formerly SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”), we review the carrying value of intangibles and other long-lived assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the property, if any, exceeds its fair market value.

Revenue Recognition

We follow the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” (formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”) for revenue recognition. In general, we record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The following policies reflect specific criteria for our various revenues streams:

Revenues from sales of products are generally recognized when products are shipped unless we have obligations remaining under sales or licensing agreements, in which case revenue is either deferred until all obligations are satisfied or recognized ratably over the term of the contract.

Revenue from services is recorded as it is earned. Commissions earned on third party sales are recorded in the month in which contracts are awarded. Customers are generally billed every two weeks based on the units of production for the project. Each project has an estimated total which is based on the estimated units of production and agreed upon billing rates. Amounts billed in advance of services being provided are recorded as deferred revenues and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations as services are provided.

Earnings per Share

We compute earnings per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share” (formerly SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”) under the provisions of ASC Topic 260, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of the common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method) and upon the conversion of convertible preferred stock (using the if-converted method). Potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the calculation if their effect is antidilutive. At June 30, 2011, there were options and warrants to purchase 5,598,536 shares of common stock, 626,667 shares issuable upon conversion of Series B preferred stock, and no shares of Series C preferred stock outstanding which could potentially dilute future earnings per share.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Formerly SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based Payments using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost recognized in the year ended September 30, 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of September 30, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to October 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of Statement 123(R). Financial results for the year ended September 30, 2005 have not been restated.

- 11 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (ASU 2010-06). This update requires additional disclosure within the roll forward of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, the update requires enhanced disclosures of the valuation techniques and inputs used in the fair value measurements within Levels 2 and 3. The new disclosure requirements were effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009 (the adoption of which did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements), except for the disclosure of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of Level 3 measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 (September 1, 2011 for the Company). As ASU 2010-06 only requires enhanced disclosures, the Company does not expect that the adoption of this update will have a material effect on its financial statements.

In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 830) — Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” ASU 2010-20 requires entities to provide disclosures designed to facilitate financial statement users’ evaluation of (i) the nature of credit risk inherent in the entity’s portfolio of financing receivables, (ii) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for credit losses and (iii) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. Disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment, the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses, and class of financing receivable, which is primarily a disaggregation of portfolio segment. The required disclosures include, among other things, a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses as well as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and credit quality indicators. ASU 2010-20 was effective for the Corporation’s financial statements as of December 31, 2010, as it relates to disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period. Disclosures that relate to activity during a reporting period will be required for the Corporation’s financial statements that include periods beginning on or after January 1, 2011. In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01 “Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20” which defers the effective date of the loan modification disclosures pending further guidance.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance which eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. The guidance requires all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements, and requires presentation on the face of the financial statements of reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard will not impact our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance and clarification about the application of existing fair value measurements and disclosure requirements. This guidance will be effective for interim and fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We will review the requirements under the standard to determine what impacts, if any, the adoption would have on our consolidated financial statements.

- 12 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment, net, consists of the following:


	Estimated Life	June 30, 2011			September 30, 2010
Office equipment	5 years	$	759,342		$	699,282
Computer software	3 years		612,379			612,379
Furniture and fixtures	5 years		261,385			261,385
Leasehold improvements	2 - 5 years		1,026,470			1,026,470
			2,659,576			2,599,516
Less: accumulated depreciation			(2,416,948	)		(2,180,643	)

		$	242,628		$	418,873

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $236,306 and $313,666 respectively.

NOTE 4 - INVENTORY

Inventory consisted of the following:


	June 30, 2011		September, 30, 2010
Raw materials	$	58,530	$	49,757
Work in progress		6,610		9,330
Finished goods		8,023		3,110
	$	73,163	$	62,197

NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE

Sand Hill Finance, LLC

On December 19, 2005, the Company entered into a Financing Agreement with Sand Hill Finance, LLC pursuant to which, together with related amendments, the Company may borrow up to 80% on the Company’s accounts receivable balances up to a maximum of $1,800,000. In conjunction with the acquisition of Inline Corporation in December, 2008, the lending limit on the credit facility was increased to $2,750,000. In addition, the Company and Sand Hill Finance, LLC entered into a 36 month term note agreement in the amount of $1,000,000. Amounts borrowed under the Financing Agreement are secured by a first security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. At June 30, 2011, the principal amount due under the Financing Agreement amounted to $1,871,408.

In November, 2008, in connection with the term note the Company executed a convertible debenture agreement with Sand Hill Finance, LLC in the amount of $1,170,767. The debenture bears interest at 18% and will allow Sand Hill Finance, LLC to convert the outstanding obligation into shares of IceWEB common stock at a fixed floor conversion price of $0.30 per share.

Interest on the accounts receivable-based borrowings is payable at a rate of 1.75% per month on the average loan balance outstanding during the year, equal to an annual interest of approximately 21% per year. The Company also agreed to pay an upfront commitment fee of 1% of the credit line upon signing the Financing Agreement, half of which was due and paid upon signing (amounting to $9,000) and half of which is due on the first anniversary of the Financing Agreement. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a commitment fee of 1% of the credit limit annually, such amounts are payable on the anniversary of the agreement.

- 13 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 5 - NOTES PAYABLE (continued)

In connection with the Financing Agreement, the Company issued Sand Hill Finance, LLC, a seven-year common stock purchase warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The exercise price was subsequently reduced to $0.50 per share pursuant to Warrant Amendment Agreement which was executed in conjunction with the convertible debenture. The warrant contains a cashless exercise provision which means that at the option of the holder, the warrant is convertible into a number of shares of our common stock as determined by dividing the aggregate fair market value of the Company’s common stock minus the aggregate exercise price of the warrant by the fair market value of one share of common stock. The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrant and the exercise price are subject to adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits and reclassifications. The fair value of the warrant of $16,250 has been recorded as an addition to paid-in capital and interest expense during the year ended September 30, 2008.

In connection with the term note, the Company issued Sand Hill Finance, LLC a seven-year common stock purchase warrant to purchase 120,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise prices $1.00 per share. The exercise price was subsequently reduced to $0.50 per share pursuant to Warrant Amendment Agreement which was executed in conjunction with the convertible debenture. The warrant contains a cashless exercise provision which means that at the option of the holder, the warrant is convertible into a number of shares of our common stock as determined by dividing the aggregate fair market value of the Company’s common stock minus the aggregate exercise price of the warrant by the fair market value of one share of common stock. The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrant and the exercise price are subject to adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits and reclassifications. The fair value of the warrant of $13,589 has been recorded as an addition to paid-in capital and deferred finance costs during the year ended September 30, 2009.

The Financing Agreement has a term of one year, subject to mutual extension by both parties. As a result, the balance due to Sand Hill Finance, LLC is classified as a current liability on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

The terms of the Financing Agreement also restrict the Company from undertaking certain transactions without the written consent of the creditor including (i) permit or suffer a change in control involving 20% of its securities, (ii) acquire assets, except in the ordinary course of business, involving payment of $100,000 or more, (iii) sell, lease, or transfer any of its property except for sales of inventory and equipment in the ordinary course of business, (iv) transfer, sell or license any intellectual property, (v) declare or pay a dividend on stock, except payable in the form of stock dividends (vi) incur any indebtedness other than trade credit in the ordinary course of business and (vii) permit any lien or security interest to attach to any collateral.

Third party guarantee - In November 2006, the Company sold its interest in one of its subsidiaries (Integrated Power Solutions, Inc. or IPS) to a shareholder of the Company and related party. IPS is a party to the Financing Agreement and can borrow against receivables transferred to Sand Hill Finance, LLC under the terms of the Financing Agreement. The Company remains liable for any such amounts borrowed under the Financing Agreement by IPS which is no longer under the Company’s control. To date, IPS has not borrowed any funds under the Financing Agreement.

NOTE 6 - CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Bank Balances

The Company maintains its cash bank deposits at various financial institutions which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Accounts are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000. At June 30, 2011, the Company had no balances in excess of FDIC insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Two customers accounted for 76% of net sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. One customer accounted for 42% of net sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2010.

Two customer’s accounts receivable balance accounted for 74% and 23% of net accounts receivable at June 30, 2011. Two customers’ accounts receivable balances accounted for 28% and 22% of net accounts receivable at June 30, 2010.

- 14 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 7 - INVESTMENTS

(a) Summary of Investments

Marketable Equity Securities:

As of June 30, 2011, the Company’s investments in marketable equity securities are based on the June 30, 2011 stock price as reflected on the OTCBB stock exchange , reduced by a discount factor if those shares have selling restrictions. These marketable equity securities are summarized as follows:


June 30, 2011	Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value

Publicly traded equity securities	$	48,000	$	92,800	$	—	$	140,800

Total	$	48,000	$	92,800	$	—	$	140,800

The unrealized gains are presented in comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

(b) Unrealized Gains and Losses on Investments

The following table summarizes the unrealized net gains (losses) associated with the Company’s investments:


	Three Months Ended						Nine months Ended
	June 30						June 30
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Net gains/(loss) on investments in publicly traded equity securities	$	(32,000	)	$	(1,120,000	)	$	(384,000	)	$	752,000

Net gains on investments	$	(32,000	)	$	(1,120,000	)	$	(384,000	)	$	752,000

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820, which, among other things, defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. The Company did not adopt the ASC 820 fair value framework for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would either be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

- 15 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 7 - INVESTMENTS (continued)

Investment Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:


	Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Marketable Equity Securities, net of discount for effect of restriction	$	—	$	—	$	140,800

We categorize the securities as investments in marketable securities available for sale. These securities are quoted either on an exchange or inter-dealer quotation (pink sheet) system. The securities are restricted and cannot be readily resold by us absent a registration of those securities under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the availabilities of an exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act. As these securities are often restricted, we are unable to liquidate them until the restriction is removed. Unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities available for sale are recognized as an element of comprehensive income based on changes in the fair value of the security. Once liquidated, realized gains or losses on the sale of marketable securities available for sale are reflected in our net income for the period in which the security was liquidated.

Under the guidance of ASC 320, “Investments”, we periodically evaluate other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) of securities to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other than temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent. It indicates that the prospects for a near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding impairment charge to earnings is recognized. In the assessment of OTTI for various securities at September 30, 2010 the guidance in ASC 320, “the Investment-Debt and Equity Securities,” is carefully followed.

There were no impairment charges on investments in publicly traded equity securities for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.

The Company has evaluated its publicly traded equity securities as of June 30, 2011, and has determined that there were no unrealized losses that indicate an other-than-temporary impairment. This determination was based on several factors, which include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the publicly traded equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

NOTE 8 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive income or loss refers to revenue, expenses, gains and losses that under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity.

Our other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains on marketable securities available for sale of $92,800 at June 30, 2011, and $476,800 at September 30, 2010.

NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS

We are on a month to month tenancy in our office space in Sterling, Virginia, as our two-year operating lease expired on March 31, 2011. The office lease agreement had certain escalation clauses and renewal options. We currently have no future minimum rental payments under operating leases.

- 16 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 10 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, in connection with the exercise of 5,525,468 stock options, the Company issued 5,525,468 shares of common stock for cash proceeds of $720,148.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 3,859,600 shares of common stock at an average per share price of $0.111, valued at $409,464 to three accredited investors. These issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2011 we issued 2,775,646 shares of restricted common stock at an average per share price of $0.211, valued at $585,000, as compensation to our employees. These issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

Common Stock Warrants

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding common stock warrants as of June 30, 2011 and changes during the period ending on that date is as follows:


	Number of Warrants			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Common Stock Warrants
Balance at beginning of year		8,287,100		$	0.40
Granted		500,000			0.40
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		(7,992,100	)		0.40
Balance at end of period		795,000		$	0.45

Warrants exercisable at end of period		795,000		$	0.45

Weighted average fair value of warrants granted or re-priced during the period				$	0.40

The following table summarizes information about common stock warrants outstanding at June 30, 2011:


	Warrants Outstanding			Warrants Exercisable
		Weighted
	Number	Average	Weighted	Number	Weighted
Range of	Outstanding at	Remaining	Average	Exercisable at	Average
Exercise	June 30,	Contractual	Exercise	June 30,	Exercise
Price	2011	Life	Price	2011	Price
$ 0.40	500,000	0.78 Years	$ 0.40	500,000	$ 0.40
$ 0.50	290,000	2.28 Years	$ 0.50	290,000	$ 0.50
$ 2.00	5,000	0.06 Years	$ 2.00	5,000	$ 2.00
	795,000		$ 0.45	795,000	$ 0.45

NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTION PLAN

In August 2000, the Board of Directors adopted the 2000 Management and Director Equity Incentive and Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) for directors, officers and employees that provides for non-qualified and incentive stock options to be issued enabling holders thereof to purchase common shares of the Company at exercise prices determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders in August 2001.

- 17 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTION PLAN (continued)

The purpose of the Plan is to advance the Company’s interests and those of its stockholders by providing a means of attracting and retaining key employees, directors and consultants. In order to serve this purpose, the Company believes the Plan encourages and enables key employees, directors and consultants to participate in its future prosperity and growth by providing them with incentives and compensation based on its performance, development and financial success. Participants in the Plan may include the Company’s officers, directors, other key employees and consultants who have responsibilities affecting our management, development or financial success.

Awards may be made under the Plan in the form of Plan options, shares of the Company’s common stock subject to a vesting schedule based upon certain performance objectives (“Performance Shares”) and shares subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient’s continued employment (“restricted shares”). Plan options may either be options qualifying as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended or options that do not so qualify. Any incentive stock option granted under the Plan must provide for an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of such grant, but the exercise price of any incentive option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of our common stock must be at least 110% of such fair market value as determined on the date of the grant. Only persons who are officers or other key employees are eligible to receive incentive stock options and performance share grants. Any non-qualified stock option granted under the Plan must provide for an exercise price of not less than 50% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of such grant.

As amended in October, 2009, the Plan permits the grant of options and shares for up to 60,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Plan terminated in August, 2010.

The term of each Plan option and the manner in which it may be exercised is determined by the Board of Directors, provided that no Plan option may be exercisable more than three years after the date of its grant and, in the case of an incentive option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of the Company’s common stock, no more than five years after the date of the grant. The exercise price of the stock options may be paid in either cash, or delivery of unrestricted shares of common stock having a fair market value on the date of delivery equal to the exercise price, or surrender of shares of common stock subject to the stock option which has a fair market value equal to the total exercise price at the time of exercise, or a combination of the foregoing methods.

The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model. The Company used the following assumptions for determining the fair value of options granted under the Black-Scholes option pricing model:


	June 30,
	2011	2010
Expected volatility	135% - 325%	135% - 325%
Expected term	0 - 5 Years	0 - 5 Years
Risk-free interest rate	0.03%	0.03%
Forfeiture Rate	0% - 45%	0% - 45%
Expected dividend yield	0%	0%

The expected volatility was determined with reference to the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury rate in effect at the time of grant.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, total stock-based compensation charged to operations for option-based arrangements amounted to $120,274. At June 30, 2011, there was approximately $56,305 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the Plan.

- 18 -

ICEWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2011

NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTION PLAN (continued)

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2011 and changes during the period ending on that date is as follows:


	Number of			Weighted Average
	Options			Exercise Price
Stock options
Balance at beginning of period		11,704,404		$	0.28
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(5,525,468	)		0.12
Forfeited		(385,000	)		0.21
Balance at end of period		5,793,936		$	0.40

Options exercisable at end of period		5,116,719		$	$0.43

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year				$	—

The following table summarizes information about employee stock options outstanding at June 30, 2011:


		Options Outstanding					Options Exercisable
Range of		Number		Weighted	Weighted		Number		Weighted
Exercise		Outstanding at		Average	Average		Exercisable at		Average
Price		June 30,		Remaining	Exercise		June 30,		Exercise
		2011		Contractual	Price		2011		Price
				Life
$	0.001-0.25		2,029,257	2.53 Years	$	0.08		1,441,840	$	0.06
	0.30-0.48		669,800	1.37 Years		0.45		580,000		0.45
	0.54-0.60		2,531,323	1.11 Years		0.58		2,531,323		0.58
	0.61-0.80		563,556	0.61 Years		0.70		563,556		0.70
			5,793,936		$	0.40		5,116,719	$	0.43

NOTE 12 - SEGMENT REPORTING

Although the Company has a number of operating divisions, separate segment data has not been presented as they meet the criteria for aggregation as permitted by ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”).

Our chief operating decision-maker is considered to be our Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The CEO reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The financial information reviewed by the CEO is identical to the information presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Therefore, the Company has determined that it operates in a single operating segment, specifically, web communications services. For the periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 all material assets and revenues of the Company were in the United States.

NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

For purposes of determining whether a post-balance sheet event should be evaluated to determine whether it has an effect on the financial statements for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, subsequent events were evaluated by the Company as of August 15, 2011, the date on which the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011, were issued.

Other than the disclosures shown, we did not identify any events or transactions that should be recognized or disclosed in the accompanying financial statements.

- 19 -

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, including footnotes, appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report.

OVERVIEW

IWEB was originally founded to serve the commercial and federal markets with network security products and proprietary on-line software solutions. In 2008, IWEB narrowed its focus and expanded its capabilities by acquiring INLINE Corporation, a data storage company specializing in custom designed, short-production run storage solutions for the Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) market. We have subsequently developed unified data storage product offerings that complement our product line.

In March, 2009, we sold our wholly owned subsidiary, IceWEB Virginia, Inc. to an unrelated 3^rd party, and in the process exited its low-margin IT re-seller business products business to further focus on the higher margin data storage manufacturing business.

We currently have three key product offerings:

IceWEB 3000/5000/6000 Unified Network Storage Solutions

Purpose Built Network/Data Appliances

Cloud Computing Products/Services

IceWEB 3000/5000/6000 Unified Network Storage Solutions

IceWEB is a leading provider of high performance Unified Network Storage solutions. Our product offerings have broad appeal in the enterprise and federal marketplaces, and are used as core building blocks (enabling technologies) of business critical storage infrastructure for a diverse group of data intensive key vertical market segments such as geospatial information systems, entertainment, security and defense, higher education, Internet Service Providers and Managed Service Providers, Oil and Gas, and Health Care. Our innovative storage systems deliver levels of performance, scalability, versatility and simplicity that exceed existing network storage alternatives. Our Unified Network Storage offerings, called the IceWEB 3000 and IceWEB 5000 are deployed as storage operating system software on our network attached storage (NAS), and storage area network (SAN) hardware products. The IceWEB 3000/5000 Unified Network Storage environments empower companies to:


	·	Quickly and easily deploy large complex data storage infrastructure environments

	·	Reduce administrative costs for managing their storage by making complex technical tasks far more simple to accomplish

	·	Reduce hardware and capital expenditure costs by more effectively using the storage within the system and repurposing older legacy hardware

	·	Protect their business critical data by leveraging IceWEB 5000’s built-in data replication features

	·	Integrate with emerging server virtualization software (VMWare, Citrix Xen and Microsoft’s Hyper V) to better manage those solutions

The IceWEB 3000/5000 replaces complex and performance-limited products with high performance, scalable and easy to use systems capable of handling the most data intensive applications and environments. Our users value the IceWEB 3000/5000s solution because it delivers three key benefits:

Performance – which equals or exceeds all competitive products.

Management – which requires less expertise and time from overburdened technical staffers

Cost – our solutions can be deployed costing up two to three times less than those of ours competitors, and are far more feature rich

- 20 -

The Competitive Landscape

Traditionally a company such as IceWEB would compete with other storage vendors of similar size, some of those competitors would be Compellent, Isilon, and LeftHand Networks. In actuality the company more often finds itself becoming an alternative in our customers’ eyes to purchasing additional equipment from large and expensive legacy storage providers such as EMC Corporation, IBM, Hewlett Packard, Network Appliance and Hitachi Data Systems. What IceWEB is finding is that with data growing at alarming rates within all organizations, budgetary and common sense decision making is creating a 2^nd Tier storage marketplace where our IceWEB 6000 is perceived as very compelling. Customers are recoiling from the high costs and fork-lift upgrades often required by the larger Tier 1 storage providers that would be necessary to accommodate their rapid data growth. Therefore, rather than purchasing additional expensive solutions from their existing vendors they opt to deploy our product with its versatile and feature rich capabilities in an overflow or project by project type environment. Because IceWEB 6000 storage space can be purchased two to three times more cheaply than the legacy alternatives, these customers are actually able to purchase ahead of their perceived data growth rate.

Purpose Built Network and Data Appliances

IceWEB has been building Purpose Built Network and Data Appliances for several years. Purpose Built Network & Data Appliances are devices which provide computer resources (processors & memory), data storage, and specific software for a specific application. The main appliance products that IceWEB has been building have been centered on a single large business partner. ESRI Corporation. IceWEB and ESRI have collaborated to create ultra-high performance IceWEB/ESRI GIS systems that allow customers to analyze data in ways never before possible. ESRI Corporation takes full responsibility for marketing to their customers and business partners, via their worldwide sales and consultancy organization.

IceWEB, in an effort to capitalize on what has been a successful model built within the Geographical Information System space with ESRI has expanded our marketing of our appliance design, manufacturing and support capabilities to additional prospective partners. In October 2009 IceWEB, Spot Image (a large satellite GIS data provider from France, and Google Corporation agreed that IceWEB would build an appliance to deliver GIS imagery from Spot Image satellite data, powered by Google Earth Enterprise. This Google Earth Engine appliance will be marketed worldwide through existing Spot Image and Google business partners. IceWEB has also recently introduced a Cloud Storage Appliance, a device which allows organizations and/or service providers to rapidly and easily deploy cloud based storage services to their constituents and customers. The company is aggressively pursuing other Purpose Built Appliance opportunities and hopes that this strategy will begin to contribute significantly to our business ramping over the next six months. Our goal is that the Appliance business segment be grown to contribute approximately 35% of overall business revenue by the end of Fiscal Year 2011.

Cloud Computing Products & Services

Cloud Computing Services

In December 2005, IceWEB launched IceMAIL ^TM a packaged software service that provides network –hosted groupware, email, and calendaring and collaboration functionality. Customers are typically organizations wishing to use Microsoft Exchange and Outlook without having to procure, maintain and manage their own equipment and software. Online services were subsequently expanded to include IcePORTAL ^TM which provides customers with a complete Intranet portal and IceSECURE ^TM a hosted email encryption service. Originally such hosted services were referred to with the acronym ‘SaaS’, which stands for Software-as-a-Service. Such services, hosted across the internet are today commonly referred to as Cloud Computing. The benefits of cloud computing are many. First, adoption of an application, infrastructure, or storage environment which is available on-demand, with no capital expenditures for the user company represents an attractive proposition from the financial perspective. Secondly, such models greatly reduce the need for highly paid internal technical staff, freeing critical resources to work on more core business related functions. Thirdly, the application software, hardware, and infrastructure needs of organizations are constantly growing and evolving – Cloud Computing allows ad-hoc allocation of resources, cost free software upgrades, and freedom from hardware/infrastructure obsolescence.

- 21 -

Cloud Storage Appliances (CSA)

Knowing full well there will be many early entrants into the much hyped Cloud Computing marketplace, IceWEB has focused our engineering and research and development efforts on crafting our products to perform as scalable ‘building blocks’ for those companies or service providers wishing to rapidly deploy high performance infrastructure to enable delivery of Cloud based services. In September 2009 IceWEB introduced a line of devices called “Cloud Storage Appliances” (CSA). A cloud storage appliance is a purpose built storage device configured for either branch office or central site deployment which allows the housing and delivery of customer data across not only their internal networking infrastructure, but also to make that data available to employees or business partners securely via the internet (often called the cloud). The CSA line has been built to address concerns within the enterprise marketplace which revolve around hesitation to entrust corporate data to third party providers such as Amazon S3, Mozy, Nirvanix, and others, and to address additional concerns about data access latency and performance. Companies, by implementing our CSA devices, can gain all of the benefits of cloud computing, while mitigating vendor lock-in issues, reducing the potential for security breaches, and maintaining high performance data transfer by back-hauling the data (and replicating it) from remote branch offices across existing wide area network links to the corporate IT infrastructure. An additional obvious benefit derived from the deployment of private or hybrid storage clouds on the CSA products is that companies do not have to pay per-megabyte or per-gigabyte transfer and storage fees to third party service companies.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2010 and notes thereto contained on Form 10-K of the Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide useful and reliable financial information about the company’s operating results and financial condition.

Financial Reporting Release No. 60, which was released by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, encourages all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements include a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.

Use of Estimates - Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations is based upon our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates these estimates, including those related to allowances for doubtful accounts receivable, the carrying value of property and equipment and long-lived assets, and the value of stock-option based compensation. Management bases these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Accounting for Stock Based Compensation - Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Formerly SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based Payments using the modified-prospective-transition method. ASC Topic 718 establishes the financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based compensation plans. As required by ASC Topic 718, we recognize the cost resulting from all stock-based payment transactions including shares issued under our stock option plans in the financial statements. The adoption of ASC Topic 718 will have a negative impact on our future results of operations.

- 22 -

Revenue Recognition - We follow the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” (formerly Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”) for revenue recognition. In general, we record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The following policies reflect specific criteria for our various revenues streams:


	·	Revenues from sales of products are generally recognized when products are shipped unless the Company has obligations remaining under sales or licensing agreements, in which case revenue is either deferred until all obligations are satisfied or recognized ratably over the term of the contract.

	·	Revenue from services is recorded as it is earned. Commissions earned on third party sales are recorded in the month in which contracts are awarded. Customers are generally billed every two weeks based on the units of production for the project. Each project has an estimated total which is based on the estimated units of production and agreed upon billing rates.

	·	Amounts billed in advance of services being provided are recorded as deferred revenues and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations as services are provided.

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 COMPARED TO THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

The following table provides an overview of certain key factors of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010:


	Three months ended June 30,		Nine months ended June 30,
	2011	2010	2011	2010
Net Revenues	$ 719,727	$ 1,203,878	$ 2,514,164	$ 2,815,900
Marketing and selling	123,955	404,443	898,299	1,189,661
Depreciation and amortization	124,831	165,585	418,625	495,984
Research and development	187,810	167,061	547,579	353,092
General and administrative	495,963	1,130,005	1,617,786	3,783,654
Total operating expenses	932,559	1,867,094	3,482,289	5,822,391
Loss from operation	(593,616)	(1,276,503)	(2,285,424)	(4,349,497)
Total other income (expense)	(104,653)	(147,240)	(302,908)	(422,196)
Net income (loss)	$ (698,269)	$ (1,423,743)	$ (2,588,332)	$ (4,771,693)

Other Key Indicators:


	Three months ended June 30,		Nine months ended June 30,
	2011	2010	2011	2010
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues	52.91%	50.94%	52.40%	47.69%
Gross profit margin	47.09%	49.06%	47.60%	52.31%
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues	68.91%	93.86%	64.35%	134.37%
Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues	129.57%	155.09%	138.51%	206.77%

Nine Month Period ended June 30, 2011

Revenues

For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we reported revenues of $2,514,164 as compared to revenues of $2,815,900 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $301,736 or approximately 11%.

- 23 -

Cost of Sales

Our cost of sales consists primarily of component parts for the manufacture of our storage products. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, cost of sales was $1,317,299, or approximately 52.4% of revenues, compared to $1,343,006, or approximately 47.7% of revenues, for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in costs of sales as a percentage of revenue and the corresponding decrease in our gross profit margin for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was the result of pricing pressure to win sales opportunities during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as a percentage of total revenue. We anticipate that our gross profit margins will remain in the range of 45% to 50% through the balance of fiscal 2011.

Total Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses decreased approximately 40% to $3,482,289 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $5,822,391 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. These changes include:

• Sales and marketing expense . Sales and marketing expense includes salaries, commission, occupancy, telephone, travel, and entertainment expenses for direct sales personnel. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, sales and marketing costs were $898,299 as compared to $1,189,661 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $291,362 or approximately 24%. The decrease is primarily due to lower sales and marketing headcount and lower stock-based compensation expense.

• Depreciation and amortization expense . For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $418,625 as compared to $495,984 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $77,359 or 16%.

• Research and Development . For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, research and development costs were $547,579 as compared to $353,092 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $194,487 or approximately 55%. Research and development expense is higher due to higher headcount and occupancy costs.

• General and administrative expense . For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, general and administrative expenses were $1,617,786 as compared to $3,783,654 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $2,165,868 or approximately 57%. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 general and administrative expenses consisted of the following:


	Fiscal Q3		Fiscal Q3
	2011		2010
Occupancy	$	24,227	$	16,065
Consulting		77,874		172,872
Employee compensation		896,012		2,958,365
Professional fees		57,895		175,120
Internet/Phone		16,744		8,575
Travel/Entertainment		29,787		24,374
Investor Relations		251,567		265,337
Insurance		31,073		34,761
Other		232,606		128,185
	$	1,617,786	$	3,783,654


	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, Occupancy expense increased to $24,227 as compared to $16,065, primarily due to an increased allocation of rent expense to administration.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, Consulting expense decreased to $77,874 as compared to $172,872, a decrease of $94,998. Consulting expense decreased primarily as a result of nonrecurring recruiting costs incurred to hire engineering, sale and marketing personnel incurred in the prior year.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, salaries and related expenses decreased to $896,012 as compared to $2,958,365, a decrease of $2,062,353. The decrease is due primarily to lower non-cash compensation expense of $300,602 as compared to $2,166,162.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, Professional fees expense decreased to $57,895 as compared to $175,120. Professional fees expense decreased due to decreased costs related to intellectual property patent applications and other legal fees.

- 24 -


	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, internet and telephone expense increased to $16,744 as compared to $8,575. The increase was primarily due to increased headcount and one-time charges incurred.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, travel and entertainment expense increased to $29,787 as compared to $24,374. The increase was primarily due to increased travel related to investor relations and analyst meetings.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 Other expense amounted to $232,606 as compared to $128,185 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $104,421. The increase is primarily related to increased bad debt expense of $100,000.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 Investor relations expense increased to $251,567 as compared to $265,337 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $13,770, or 5.2%.

	•	For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, insurance expense decreased to $31,073 as compared to $34,761. The decrease was primarily due to cost cutting measures.

We anticipate that general and administrative expenses will remain stable for the balance of fiscal 2011, as we expect to incur lower share-based expenses.

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

We reported a loss from operations of $2,285,424 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to a loss from operations of $4,349,497 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decreased loss of $2,064,073,186 or approximately 47%.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)

Interest Expense . For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, interest expense amounted to $302,908 as compared to $422,196 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $119,288 or 28%. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to the decrease in borrowings and certain interest bearing liabilities related to our notes payable.

NET LOSS

Our net loss was $2,588,332 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a net loss of $4,771,693 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010.

Three Month Period ended June 30, 2011

Revenues

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we reported revenues of $719,727 as compared to revenues of $1,203,878 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $484,151 or approximately 50%. The decrease is primarily due to slowdown in activity with the Federal government due to the uncertainty of the Federal budget and debt ceiling negotiations.

Cost of Sales

Our cost of sales consists of component parts for the manufacture of our storage products. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, cost of sales was $380,784, or approximately 52.9% of revenues, compared to $613,287, or approximately 50.9% of revenues, for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in costs of sales as a percentage of revenue and the corresponding decrease in our gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 was the result of lower margins on competitive opportunities in order to win deals.

Total Operating Expenses

Our total operating expenses decreased approximately 50% to $932,559 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $1,867,094 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. These changes include:

- 25 -

• Sales and marketing expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2011, sales and marketing expenses were $123,955 as compared to $404,443 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $280,488 or approximately 69%. The decrease was due to slightly lower headcount during the three months ended June 30, 20011, and the nonrecurring sales and marketing expense related to the roll-out of our channel sales program during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

• Depreciation and amortization expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2011, depreciation and amortization expense amounted to $124,831 as compared to $165,585 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $40,754 or 25%.

• Research and Development . For the three months ended June 30, 2011, research and development costs were $187,810 as compared to $167,061 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $20,749 or approximately 12%. Research and development expense is higher due to higher headcount and occupancy costs.

• General and administrative expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2011, general and administrative expenses were $495,963 as compared to $1,130,005 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $634,042 or approximately 56%. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 general and administrative expenses consisted of the following:


	Fiscal Q3		Fiscal Q3
	2011		2010
Occupancy	$	7,769	$	5,403
Consulting		2,950		89,969
Employee compensation		338,649		593,657
Professional fees		25,436		120,571
Internet/Phone		4,108		3,427
Travel/Entertainment		13,667		23,858
Investor Relations		45,333		235,374
Insurance		8,610		10,808
Other		49,442		46,938
	$	495,963	$	1,130,005


	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, Occupancy expense increased to $7,769 as compared to $5,403.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, Consulting expense decreased to $2,950 as compared to $89,969, a decrease of $87,019 or 97%. Consulting expense decreased primarily as a result of decreased support costs for internal accounting systems.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, salaries and related expenses decreased to $338,649 as compared to $593,657, a decrease of $255,008. The decrease is due primarily to a decrease in non-cash stock and option based compensation expense of $187,396.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, Professional fees expense decreased to $25,436 as compared to $120,571. Professional fees expense decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in legal fees incurred related to business development and on-going litigation activities.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, Internet/Phone expense increased to $4,108 as compared to $3,427. Phone expense increased primarily due to one-time charges incurred.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, travel and entertainment expense decreased to $13,667 as compared to $23,858. Travel and entertainment expense decreased during the current quarter as a result of decreased travel for investor relations and general corporate travel activity.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011, Insurance expense decreased to $8,610 as compared to $10,808, a decrease of $2,198, or 20%.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Other expense amounted to $49,442 as compared to $46,938 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2,504, or 5%.

	•	For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Investor relations expense decreased to $45,333 as compared to $253,374 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease is due to less need for investor relations activity versus the prior year.

- 26 -

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

We reported a loss from operations of $593,616 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to a loss from operations of $1,276,503 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $682,887or approximately 53%.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)

Interest Expense . For the three months ended June 30, 2011, interest expense amounted to $104,653 as compared to $147,240 for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $42,587 or 29%. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to the decrease in borrowings and certain interest bearing liabilities related to the acquisition of Inline Corporation.

NET LOSS

Our net loss was $698,269 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a net loss of $1,423,743 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. The following table provides an overview of certain selected balance sheet comparisons between June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010:


	June 30,	September 30,	$	%
	2011	2010	Change	Change

Working Capital	$ (1,567,326)	$ (1,250,033)	$ (317,293)	25.4%

Cash	4,184	540,156	(535,972)	(99.2%)
Marketable Securities	140,800	524,800	(384,000)	(73.2%)
Accounts receivable, net	1,777,160	1,466,483	310,677	21.2%
Inventory	73,163	62,197	10,966	17.6%
Total current assets	1,906,203	2,106,941	(200,738)	(9.5%)
Property and equipment, net	242,628	418,873	(176,245)	(42.1%)

Intangibles, net	364,632	546,951	(182,319)	(33.3%)
Total assets	$ 2,667,583	$ 3,610,886	$ (943,303)	(26.1%)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,587,217	1,648,252	(61,035)	(3.7%)
Notes payable-current	1,871,408	1,649,140	222,268	13.5%
Deferred revenue	14,904	59,582	(44,678)	(75.0%)
Total current liabilities	3,473,529	3,356,974	116,555	3.5%
Total liabilities	3,473,529	3,356,974	116,555	3.5%
Accumulated deficit	(32,211,122)	(29,622,792)	(2,588,330)	8.7%
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity	(805,946)	253,912	(1,059,859)	(417.4%)

Net cash used in operating activities was $1,827,791 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $2,900,065 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $1,072,406. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we had a loss of $2,588,332 offset by non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization expense of $418,625, share-based compensation expense of $585,000, and decreases from changes in assets and liabilities of $356,452. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011 we experienced an increase in accounts receivable of $310,677, and a decrease in accounts payable during the period of $61,035. For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we had a loss of $4,771,693 offset by non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization expense of $495,984, share-based compensation expense of $2,181,020, amortization of deferred finance costs of $7,360, and decreases from changes in assets and liabilities of $798,017. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010 we experienced an increase in accounts receivable of $1,266,686, and a decrease in accounts payable during the period of $412,095.

- 27 -

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 was $60,061 as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $133,624 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we used cash of $60,061 for property and equipment purchases. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, we used cash of $85,624 for property and equipment purchases and $48,000 to acquire 160,000,000 shares of VOIS Inc. common stock.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 was $1,351,880 as compared to net cash provided of $4,247,242 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities related to proceeds received from notes payable of $818,481 which were advances under our factoring line with Sand Hill Finance LLC, proceeds from the exercise of common stock options of $720,148, and proceeds from the sale or restricted stock of $409,464, offset by repayments on notes payable of $596,213 which were to pay down the balance on the Sand Hill Finance LLC factoring line. For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities related to proceeds received from the sale of restricted stock of $2,320,630, proceeds from notes payable of $985,900 which were advances under our factoring line with Sand Hill Finance LLC, proceeds from the exercise of common stock options of $1,898,374, offset by repayments on notes payable of $957,662 which were to pay down the balance on the Sand Hill Finance LLC factoring line.

At June 30, 2011 we had a working capital deficit of $1,567,326 and an accumulated deficit of $32,211,122. The report from our independent registered public accounting firm on our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 contained an explanatory paragraph regarding doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern as a result of our net losses in operations. While our sales decreased slightly during the nine months ended June 30, 2011, our gross profit margin was approximately 47.6% and our sales were not sufficient to pay our operating expenses. We reported a net loss of $2,588,332 for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. There are no assurances that we will report income from operations in any future periods.

Historically, our revenues have not been sufficient to fund our operations and we have relied on capital provided through the sale of equity securities, and various financing arrangements and loans from related parties. At June 30, 2011 we had cash on hand of $4,184. In fiscal 2006, we entered into a receivable factoring agreement with Sand Hill Finance, LLC under which we can sell certain accounts receivable to the lender on a full recourse basis at 80% of the face amount of the receivable up to an aggregate of $3.0 million. At June 30, 2011 we owed Sand Hill Finance, LLC $1,871,408 under this accounts receivable line.

We do not have any commitments for capital expenditures. In connection with our annual report for our fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 our management will be required to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, including a statement as to whether or not internal control over financial reporting is effective. We do not presently have any external sources of working capital other than what may be available under the factoring agreement with Sand Hill Finance and loans from related parties. Our working capital needs in future periods are dependent primarily on the rate at which we can increase our revenues while controlling our expenses and decreasing the use of cash to fund operations. Additional capital may be needed to fund acquisitions of additional companies or assets, although we are not a party to any pending agreements at this time and, accordingly, cannot estimate the amount of capital which may be necessary, if any, for acquisitions.

As long as our cash flow from operations remains insufficient to completely fund operations, we will continue depleting our financial resources and seeking additional capital through equity and/or debt financing. Under the terms of the financing agreement with Sand Hill Finance, LLC we agreed not to incur any additional indebtedness other than trade credit in the ordinary course of business. These covenants may limit our ability to raise capital in future periods.

There can be no assurance that acceptable financing can be obtained on suitable terms, if at all. Our ability to continue our existing operations and to continue growth strategy could suffer if we are unable to raise the additional funds on acceptable terms which will have the effect of adversely affecting our ongoing operations and limiting our ability to increase our revenues and maintain profitable operations in the future. If we are unable to secure the necessary additional working capital as needed, we may be forced to curtail some or all of our operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

None.

- 28 -

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures . Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by the Quarterly Report (the “evaluation date’). They have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities and would be disclosed on a timely basis.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting . There were no changes to internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially impact, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

At June 30, 2011 we are the subject of, or party to, three known, pending or threatened, legal actions. As of the date of this report on Form 10-Q, none of the legal proceedings have been resolved. Following is a discussion of each:


	1.	We were named as the defendant in a legal proceeding brought by Immixtechnology, Inc. (the plaintiff) in the Fairfax County Circuit Court, Fairfax, Virginia. The plaintiff asserts that Iceweb failed to pay for certain computer components purchased from plaintiff.

	2.	We were named as the defendant in a legal proceeding brought by FedEx Customer Information Services, Inc. (the plaintiff) in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia. The plaintiff asserts that Iceweb failed to pay for delivery of services provided by plaintiff.

	3.	We were named as the defendant in a legal proceeding brought by FedEx Customer Information Services, Inc. (the plaintiff) in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia. The plaintiff asserts that Iceweb failed to pay for delivery of services provided by plaintiff.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 29, 2010, which could materially affect our business operations, financial condition or future results. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business operations and/or financial condition. There have been no material changes to our risk factors since the filing of our Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During October, 2010, we issued 78,396 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.255, valued at $20,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During November, 2010, we issued 82,340 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.243, valued at $20,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During December, 2010, we issued 104,739 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.191, valued at $20,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

- 29 -

During December, 2010, we issued 700,000 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.17, valued at $119,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During January, 2011, we issued 109,767 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.182, valued at $20,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During February, 2011, we issued 85,344 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.176, valued at $15,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During March, 2011, we issued 15,061 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.199, valued at $3,000 to our employees as compensation. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 2,250,000 shares of common stock at a per share price of $0.10, valued at $225,000 to an accredited investor. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 370,000 shares of common stock to a consultant, valued at $77,585 to an accredited investor, at a per share price of $0.21. The issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of that act.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description

31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

101		XBRL data files of Financial Statements and Notes contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.**

* Filed herein

** In accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed.”

- 30 -

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	ICEWEB, INC.

	By:	/s/ John R. Signorello
August 15, 2011	John R. Signorello,
	Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer

	By:	/s/ Mark B. Lucky
August 15, 2011	Mark B. Lucky
	Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

- 31 -