TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
Introduction			1
Security Ownership of Management and Others			2
Items to be Voted On			4
Proposal One: Election of Directors			4
Proposal Two: Ratification of the Appointment of the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2018			6
Board Information			7
Composition of the Board of Directors			7
Meetings			7
Director Independence			7
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight			7
Shareholder Communications with the Board			7
Nomination of Director Candidates			8
Director Compensation			9
Committees			9
Executive Committee			9
Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee			9
Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation			10
Code of Business Ethics			10
Audit Committee			10
Pre-Approval Policy			11
Report of Audit Committee			11
Audit and Non-Audit Fees			12
Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Executive Compensation			13
Report of Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation			13
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			13
Long-Term Incentive Plan Award Policy			15
Risk Management and Compensation			16
Pay Ratio			16
Summary Compensation Table			17
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2017			18
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2017			20
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2017			21
Pension Benefits			21
Employment Contracts and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control			22
Other Information			23
Transactions with Related Persons			23
Method of Proxy Solicitation			23
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance			24
Other Matters			24
Shareholder Proposals			24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION

The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Weyco Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for exercise at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held at the offices of the Company, 333 West Estabrook Boulevard, Glendale, Wisconsin 53212, at 10:00 A.M. (Central Daylight Time) on Tuesday, May 8, 2018, or any adjournment thereof.

The Proxy Statement and Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K are also available on the Company’s website at https://www.weycogroup.com/home/sec_filing.html. The 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which also accompanies this Proxy Statement, contains financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2017, and certain other information concerning the Company. The 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K is neither a part of this Proxy Statement nor incorporated herein by reference.

Any shareholder delivering the form of proxy has the power to revoke it at any time prior to the time of the annual meeting by filing with the Secretary of the Company an instrument of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the meeting and electing to vote in person by giving notice of such election to the Secretary of the Company. Attendance at the meeting will not in itself constitute revocation of a proxy. Proxies properly signed and returned will be voted as specified thereon. The Proxy Statement and the proxy are being mailed to shareholders on approximately April 4, 2018.

The Company has outstanding only one class of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting — common stock with one vote per share. As of March 16, 2018, the record date for determination of the common shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof, there were 10,259,993 outstanding shares of common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

The following table sets forth information, as of the March 16, 2018, record date, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by each director and nominee for director, for each of the named executive officers identified in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” herein and by all current directors and executive officers as a group. Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. and John W. Florsheim are brothers and their father is Thomas W. Florsheim. Also, executive officers John F. Wittkowske and George Sotiros are brothers-in-law. There are no other family relationships between any of the Company’s directors and executive officers.

Name of Beneficial Owner		Number of Shares and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)(2)(3)				Percent of Class(4)
Thomas W. Florsheim 333 W. Estabrook Blvd., Glendale, WI 53212			1,181,277				11.50	%
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. 333 W. Estabrook Blvd., Glendale, WI 53212			1,708,980	(5)(6)(7)			16.45	%
John W. Florsheim. 333 W. Estabrook Blvd., Glendale, WI 53212			941,701				9.07	%
John F. Wittkowske			219,460				2.11	%
Robert Feitler			254,645				2.48	%
Frederick P. Stratton, Jr.			162,535				1.58	%
Cory L. Nettles			14,078					*
Tina Chang			16,848					*
Brian Flannery			49,650					*
Kevin Schiff			35,825					*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (15 persons including the above-named)			4,721,042				43.60	%

Notes:

Thomas W. Florsheim			1,169,652
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			942,946
John W. Florsheim			316,663
Robert Feitler			20,000
Frederick P. Stratton, Jr.			30,300
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group			2,479,56 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2017, with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by those persons, other than those reflected in the above table, known to the Company to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the common stock outstanding.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner		Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership				Percent
(1) Royce & Associates, LP   745 Fifth Avenue   New York, New York 10151			856,434				8.4	%

Note:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEMS TO BE VOTED ON

Proposal One: Election of Directors

At the annual meeting, three directors will be elected for terms expiring in 2021. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has recommended, and the Board of Directors has nominated, the following nominees for election: John W. Florsheim, Frederick P. Stratton, Jr., and Cory L. Nettles, all of whom are current directors of the Company.

A majority of the votes entitled to be cast by outstanding shares of common stock, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of the Company’s common stock at a meeting at which a quorum is present. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the meeting. Consequently, any shares not voted (whether by abstention, broker nonvote or otherwise) have no impact in the election of directors except to the extent the failure to vote for an individual results in another individual receiving a comparatively larger number of votes. Votes “against” a candidate are not given legal effect and are not counted as votes cast in an election of directors. Votes will be tabulated by an inspector at the meeting.

If any of the nominees should decline or be unable to act as a director, which is not expected, the proxies will be voted with discretionary authority by the persons named to vote in the proxy for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors.

Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. and John W. Florsheim are brothers, and their father is Thomas W. Florsheim. There are no other family relationships between any of the Company’s directors.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of
John W. Florsheim, Frederick P. Stratton, Jr., and Cory L. Nettles

Information regarding the nominees and the directors whose terms continue, including the particular skills, qualifications and other attributes that the Company believes qualify each of its nominees and continuing directors to serve on the Board, is set forth below. For additional information regarding the criteria to evaluate Board memberships, see “Board Information — Nomination of Director Candidates” below.

Nominees for Term Expiring 2021

John W. Florsheim, Age 54, Director since 1996

Mr. Florsheim has served as President, Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company since 2002. He also has served as a Director of North Shore Bank since 2008. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Florsheim served as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Secretary of the Company. From 1996 to 1999, he served as Executive Vice President of the Company, and from 1994 to 1996, he served as Vice President of the Company. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Florsheim was a Brand Manager for M&M/Mars, Inc. from 1990 to 1994.

Mr. Florsheim brings to the Board over 24 years of experience in the shoe industry as well as detailed knowledge of the overall operations of the Company and expertise in the areas of sales and marketing, licensing and customer relations.

Frederick P. Stratton, Jr., Age 79, Director since 1976

Chairman of Audit Committee
Member of Executive Committee and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee

Mr. Stratton has served as Chairman Emeritus of Briggs & Stratton Corporation (a manufacturer of gasoline engines) since 2003. He has been a Director of Baird Funds, Inc., since 2004. Mr. Stratton served as Chairman of the Board of Briggs & Stratton Corporation from 1986 to 2002. From 1977 to 2001, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Briggs & Stratton Corporation. He also formerly served as a Director of Midwest Air Group, Inc. from 1988 to 2007 and Wisconsin Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries, Wisconsin Electric Power Company and Wisconsin Gas LLC, from 1987 through 2012.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Through his many years of experience as the Chief Executive Officer of Briggs & Stratton, a large multinational manufacturing company, Mr. Stratton brings extensive experience in all areas of executive management, including finance, acquisitions, relations with retailers, sales and marketing, labor relations, and international business to the Board. In addition, Mr. Stratton brings his prior experience as a securities/investment analyst to the Board. Mr. Stratton continues to be an active member of corporate Boards, and his contributions over the years to the Company’s Board have been invaluable.

Cory L. Nettles, Age 48, Director since 2005

Member of Executive Committee, Audit Committee, and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee

Mr. Nettles has served as Managing Director of Generation Growth Capital, Inc. (a private equity firm), since 2007. He has also been a Director of Baird Funds, Inc. since 2008, a Director of Associated Banc-Corp. since 2013 (NASDAQ: ASBC), and a Director of the Milwaukee Bucks since 2016. Mr. Nettles was Of Counsel, Business Law and Government Relations at Quarles & Brady LLP (a law firm) from 2007 to 2016. He was also a Director and Advisor of Baird Private Equity from 2008 to 2012 and served as a Director and Advisor of The Private Bank — Wisconsin from 2007 to 2011.

From 2005 to 2007, Mr. Nettles was a Partner in the Business Law and Government Relations Group at Quarles & Brady LLP and was Secretary for the Wisconsin Department of Commerce from 2003 to 2005. He was also a Director of the Midcities Venture Capital Fund from 2005 to 2007.

Mr. Nettles’ prior experience as Secretary for the Wisconsin Department of Commerce provides the Company with a unique insight into the government’s interactions with businesses. His background as an attorney provides a legal perspective to the Company’s corporate matters. Mr. Nettles is highly involved in many civic organizations and brings a depth of knowledge of the local business community to the Board.

Continuing Directors for Term Expiring 2019

Tina Chang, Age 46, Director since 2007

Member of Executive Committee, Audit Committee, and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee

Since 1996, Ms. Chang has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of SysLogic, Inc. (an information systems consulting and services firm). Ms. Chang also served as a Director and Advisor of The Private Bank — Wisconsin from 2004 to 2013.

Ms. Chang brings to the Board a strong background in business, technology and process development in the information technology arena. With technology being a fluid and increasingly important component of business, Ms. Chang’s experience is invaluable to the Board. She is also strongly involved in the local business community and with charitable organizations, and brings to the Board these varied experiences.

Thomas W. Florsheim, Age 87, Director since 1964

Member of Executive Committee

Mr. Florsheim has served as Chairman Emeritus of the Company since 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Florsheim served as Chairman of the Board of the Company from 1968 to 2002, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1964 to 1999, and as President of the Company from 1964 to 1968.

Mr. Florsheim brings to the Board a lifetime of experience in the shoe industry, including more than 30 years of leadership of the Company. Prior to his tenure at the Company, he was an executive at Florsheim Shoe Company. Through his more than 50 years of experience in the shoe industry, he brings significant expertise and depth of knowledge in every area of the shoe industry to the Company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Continuing Directors for Term Expiring 2020

Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr., Age 60, Director since 1996

Chairman of the Board since 2002

Mr. Florsheim has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Florsheim was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1999 to 2002, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from 1996 to 1999, and Vice President of the Company from 1988 to 1996. Mr. Florsheim has also served as a Director of Strattec Security Corp. (a manufacturer of automotive access control products) (NASDAQ: STRT) since 2012.

Mr. Florsheim has worked at the Company for 37 years. Prior to becoming an executive of the Company, he held various managerial positions, including managing the retail division and subsequently the purchasing department. Mr. Florsheim’s day-to-day leadership and intimate knowledge of the Company’s business and operations provide the Board with industry-specific experience and expertise.

Robert Feitler, Age 87, Director since 1964

Chairman of Executive Committee and Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee
Member of Audit Committee

Mr. Feitler has served as a Director of TC Manufacturing Co. (a manufacturer of flexible packaging) since 1974. He also served as a Director of Strattec Security Corp. from 1995 to 2012. From 1968 to 1996, Mr. Feitler was President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

Mr. Feitler worked for the Company as its President and Chief Operating Officer for 28 years. His intimate knowledge of the Company and industry are invaluable. He continues to be an active director or trustee of other private entities and he brings that experience to the Company.

Proposal Two: Ratification of the Appointment of the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2018

Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP has audited the Company’s financial statements since 2015. The Audit Committee appointed them as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.

The Company asks that you ratify the appointment of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018. Representatives of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Although not required by law to submit the appointment to a vote by shareholders, the Audit Committee and the Board believe it is appropriate, as a matter of policy, to request that the shareholders ratify the appointment of its independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

If the appointment is not ratified, the adverse vote will be considered as an indication to the Audit Committee that it should consider selecting another independent registered public accounting firm for the following year. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it believes that such a change would be in the Company’s best interest.

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly
Virchow Krause, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2018.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BOARD INFORMATION

Composition of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors currently has seven members. The Bylaws of the Company provide that there shall be seven directors, divided into three staggered classes. Directors are elected to three-year terms. The number of directors may be increased or decreased from time to time by amending the applicable provision of the Bylaws, but no decrease shall have the effect of shortening the term of an incumbent director.

Meetings

The Board of Directors held four meetings during 2017. All members of the Board of Directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which they served. The Company’s policy is that its directors should attend the annual meeting of shareholders. All Board members attended the annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on May 9, 2017. In accordance with the NASDAQ rules, the Company’s independent directors have periodic meetings at which only independent directors are present.

Director Independence

Each year, the Board reviews the relationships that each director has with the Company. Only those directors who the Board affirmatively determines have no relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, and who do not have any of the categorical relationships that preclude a determination of independence under the NASDAQ listing standards, are considered to be independent directors.

In accordance with the applicable NASDAQ rules, the Board has determined that the following directors qualify as independent directors: Tina Chang, Robert Feitler, Cory L. Nettles, and Frederick P. Stratton, Jr. The Board concluded that none of these directors possessed the categorical relationships set forth in the NASDAQ standards that preclude a determination of independence, and that none of them have any other relationship that the Board believes would interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee are comprised solely of directors who have been determined to be independent. Because of their relationships with the Company, Messrs. Thomas W. Florsheim, Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. and John Florsheim are not independent directors.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The Company combines the positions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s management and Board of Directors currently believe that the Chief Executive Officer’s direct involvement in the day-to-day operations of the Company makes him best positioned to lead Board discussions of the Company’s short-term and long-term objectives and helps ensure proper oversight of the Company’s risks. Additionally, the Company’s Board structure provides oversight by its independent directors. The independent directors meet periodically without any members of management present. In addition, each of the Board’s standing committees is chaired by an independent director and both the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee are comprised solely of directors who are independent. The Board has not appointed an independent lead director; however, the Chairman of each of the above mentioned committees typically leads the non-management sessions of that particular committee.

The Company’s Board of Directors plays a role in the oversight of risks that could potentially affect the Company. The Board’s Audit Committee fulfills the formal responsibility of financial risk management as disclosed in its charter, which is available on the Company’s website. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management to review the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is responsible for the evaluation of risk as it relates to compensation.

Shareholder Communications with the Board

Shareholders wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors or with a particular Board member should address communications to the Board or to a particular Board member, c/o Secretary, Weyco Group, Inc., 333 West Estabrook Boulevard, Glendale, Wisconsin 53212. All communications addressed to the Board or to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a particular director or committee will be relayed to that addressee. From time to time, the Board may change the process through which shareholders communicate with the Board. Please refer to the Company’s website at www.weycogroup.com for changes in this process.

Nomination of Director Candidates

The principal functions of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee are: (1) to assist the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board and its Committees, and to recommend to the Board the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders; (2) to recommend to the Board the corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company, including changes to those guidelines as appropriate from time to time; (3) to lead the Board in its periodic reviews of the Board’s performance; (4) to establish, subject to approval of the full Board, compensation arrangements for the Company’s executive officers; (5) to administer the Company’s equity incentive and other compensation plans, and approve the granting of equity awards to officers and other key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries; and (6) to communicate to shareholders regarding these policies and activities as required by the SEC and other regulatory bodies. The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Charter and the Guidelines and Criteria for Nomination of Director Candidates are available on the Company’s website.

In carrying out its responsibilities regarding director nominations, the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has established the following Guidelines and Criteria for Nomination of Director Candidates:

From time to time, the Board may change the process through which shareholders may recommend director candidates to the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. The Company has not received any shareholder recommendations for director candidates with regard to the election of directors covered by this Proxy Statement or otherwise.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Compensation

Directors of the Company who are not also employees of the Company or subsidiaries receive a quarterly cash retainer. The quarterly cash retainer was $5,600 during 2017. Non-employee directors are also eligible to receive equity awards. In 2017, each non-employee director received 1,000 shares of restricted stock and options to purchase 3,500 shares of common stock under the Weyco Group, Inc. 2017 Incentive Plan. The restricted stock awards vest ratably over four years. The stock option awards vest ratably over five years. The following table shows director compensation for the non-employee directors for 2017.

Name		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)				Restricted Stock Awards ($)(1)				Stock Option Awards ($)(2)				Total ($)
Thomas W. Florsheim		$	22,400			$	27,940			$	14,175			$	64,515
Tina Chang		$	22,400			$	27,940			$	14,175			$	64,515
Robert Feitler		$	22,400			$	27,940			$	14,175			$	64,515
Cory L. Nettles		$	22,400			$	27,940			$	14,175			$	64,515
Frederick P. Stratton, Jr.		$	22,400			$	27,940			$	14,175			$	64,515

Notes:

On December 28, 2000, Chairman Emeritus of the Board, Thomas W. Florsheim, entered into a consulting agreement with the Company under which he agreed to act as advisor to the Company in connection with the Company’s acquisition and sale of products and materials. In accordance with this agreement, Thomas W. Florsheim was paid $14,400 in 2017. This amount is not reflected in the Director Compensation table immediately above.

Committees

The Board of Directors has three standing committees: an executive committee (the “Executive Committee”), a corporate governance and compensation committee (the “Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee”) and an audit committee (the “Audit Committee”).

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee is empowered to exercise the authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Company between meetings of the Board, except for declaring dividends, filling vacancies in the Board of Directors or committees thereof, amending the Articles of Incorporation, adopting, amending or repealing Bylaws and certain other matters as provided in the Bylaws. Robert Feitler is the Chairman of the Executive Committee and Tina Chang, Thomas W. Florsheim, Cory L. Nettles and Frederick P. Stratton, Jr. are members. No meetings of the Executive Committee were held in 2017.

Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee

The Company is committed to conducting its business with the highest standards of business ethics and in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including the rules of the SEC and of the NASDAQ on which its common stock is traded. In addition to the NASDAQ rules and applicable governmental laws and regulations, the framework for the Company’s corporate governance is provided by: (a) the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws; (b) the charters of its board committees; and (c) the Company’s Code of Business Ethics.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is responsible for various matters related to corporate and board governance including, among others, director nominations. See “Nomination of Director Candidates” above for additional information regarding the committee’s responsibilities.

The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee also establishes compensation arrangements for senior management and administers the granting of stock-based awards to officers and other key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee (Robert Feitler, Tina Chang, Cory L. Nettles and Frederick P. Stratton, Jr.) is “independent,” as defined in the current listing standards of the NASDAQ and the SEC rules relating to such committees. Three meetings of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee were held in 2017. The charter of the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is available on the Company’s website.

Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Board of Directors who served on the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee during 2017 was an officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer serves, or in the past has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any other entity that has any of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee.

Code of Business Ethics

The Company’s Code of Business Ethics sets forth ethical obligations for all employees, officers and directors, including those that apply specifically to directors and executive officers, such as accounting and financial reporting matters. Any waiver of the Code of Business Ethics requires approval of the Board of Directors or of a committee of the Board. The Company’s Code of Business Ethics is available on the Company’s website. If any substantive amendment is made to the Code, the nature of the amendment will be disclosed on the Company’s website or in a current report on Form 8-K. In addition, if a waiver from the Code is granted to an executive officer or director, the nature of the waiver will be disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for providing independent oversight of the Company’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, the systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual independent audit of the Company’s financial statements. The Board of Directors adopted and approved a formal written charter for the Audit Committee in 2000 and amended that charter in March 2004. A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on the Company’s website (www.weycogroup.com). The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee (Frederick P. Stratton, Jr., Tina Chang, Robert Feitler, and Cory L. Nettles) is “independent,” as defined in the current listing standards of the NASDAQ and the SEC rules relating to audit committees. This means that, except in their roles as members of the Board of Directors and its committees, they are not “affiliates” of the Company, they receive no consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees directly or indirectly from the Company, they have no other relationships with the Company that may interfere with the exercise of their independence from management and the Company, and they have not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any of its current subsidiaries at any time during the past three years. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member satisfies the financial literacy requirements of NASDAQ and that Robert Feitler and Frederick P. Stratton, Jr. qualify as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of applicable rules of the SEC.

Management has primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee reviewed the Company’s audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Committee also discussed and reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm all communications required under generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), including PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. In addition, the independent registered public accounting firm provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence. The Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence from management and the Company and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence.

The Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plan for their audit. The Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Committee held four meetings during 2017.

Pre-Approval Policy

Consistent with the rules of the SEC regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for recommending appointment of, setting compensation for, and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the following provision is included in the Audit Committee’s charter: “The Audit Committee shall … approve in advance the audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by, and the fees to be paid to, the independent auditor, subject to the de minimis exceptions to pre-approval permitted by the rules of the SEC and NASDAQ for non-audit services.” No fees were paid to the independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the “de minimis” exception to the foregoing pre-approval policy.

Report of Audit Committee

In connection with its function to oversee and monitor the financial reporting process of the Company, the Audit Committee has done the following (among other things):

Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Frederick P. Stratton, Jr., Chairman
Tina Chang
Robert Feitler
Cory L. Nettles

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The Audit Committee also reviewed the fees and scope of services provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 2017, and 2016. Fees billed to the Company by Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, are reflected in the following table.

		2017				2016
Audit Fees(a)		$	267,321			$	258,239
Audit-Related Fees(b)			24,300				20,000
Tax Fees			—				—
All Other Fees			—				—
Total		$	291,621			$	278,239

There were no other fees billed by Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP for services rendered to the Company, other than the services described above, in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Report of Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation

In connection with its function to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities to assure that the executive officers of the Company are compensated in a manner consistent with the compensation strategy of the Company, internal equity considerations, competitive practice, and the requirements of applicable tax and regulatory bodies, the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has (among other things) reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company’s management. Based on that review and discussion, the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and included in this Proxy Statement.

Robert Feitler, Chairman
Tina Chang
Cory L. Nettles
Frederick P. Stratton, Jr.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) establishes compensation arrangements for senior management and administers the granting of stock-based awards to officers and other key employees of the Company. The Committee is composed entirely of independent, non-employee members of the Board of Directors and has the authority to utilize consultants and advisors as it may deem appropriate. The Company provides appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for the payment of compensation to the compensation consultant(s) employed by the Committee. The Committee reports to the Board of Directors on its actions and recommendations and periodically meets in executive session without members of management or management directors present.

The expertise and knowledge of each executive officer is important to the success of the Company. Although the substantial stock ownership by the Florsheim family gives them additional incentives to help the Company succeed, the Company believes that a fair and competitive executive compensation program is essential to attract and retain other key executives and is in the Company’s long-term best interests. A key objective of the Company’s executive compensation program is to provide a fair and competitive compensation package to each of its executive officers without encouraging unnecessary risk-taking. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants, legal counsel or other advisers as it deems appropriate in connection with determining the compensation of its executive officers. Historically, outside consultants have been used sparingly or not at all. In addition, the Committee considers the results of advisory “say-on-pay” shareholder votes when making compensation decisions. At the 2017 annual meeting, when the latest advisory “say-on-pay” vote was held, the Company’s shareholders voted to approve, by a significant margin, the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. The Committee considered the result of this vote as support for its executive compensation system. The Company currently holds an advisory “say-on-pay” vote every three years. Accordingly, the next vote will occur at the 2020 annual meeting.

The primary elements of the Company’s compensation program are: (1) an annual base salary; (2) an annual performance-based cash bonus; (3) discretionary long-term stock-based awards, subject to time-based vesting requirements; and (4) pension benefits. The combination of these compensation elements is designed to provide executives competitive compensation that maintains a balance between cash and stock compensation tied to the performance of the Company and long-term shareholder value. To reinforce the importance of balancing long-term and short-term perspectives, the Company’s executives are provided with both (1) annual incentives, of which a portion is at-risk based on achievement of the Company’s annual financial goals and objectives and (2) time-based long-term incentives which are intended to align the interests of executives with the interests of shareholders and encourage officer retention.

Base salaries are set at levels that are competitive with similar positions at other comparable companies and historically have increased modestly year-over-year. Larger increases or decreases in an executive’s annual base salary would be considered if functional responsibilities changed substantially.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cash bonuses are awarded pursuant to the 2017 Incentive Plan, which is qualified under section 162(m) of the Code. The annual cash bonus is principally designed to reward the achievement of Company-wide financial goals established by the Committee. The Company has historically set financial goals based on the results achieved in the prior year.

For the years 2017, 2016 and 2015, the potential for an annual cash bonus for Mr. Thomas Florsheim, Jr., Mr. John Florsheim, and Mr. Wittkowske was based solely on the achievement of Company-wide financial goals set by the Committee. In each of these years, a bonus was to be paid only upon the Company achieving an increase in net earnings over the previous year. For 2017, a target bonus equal to 45%, 45% and 40% of the annual base salary for Mr. Thomas Florsheim Jr., Mr. John Florsheim and Mr. Wittkowske, respectively, would have been paid had 2017 net earnings increased between 4% and 6% over net earnings in 2016, excluding all non-recurring adjustments. The target bonus was to be pro-rated for increases in net earnings between 0% and 4%. The aforementioned executives would have been eligible for a “stretch” bonus equal to 150% of the target bonus had 2017 net earnings increased 8%. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for earnings increases between 6% and 8%. See the table titled “Grants of Plan-Based Awards For 2017” for the estimated possible payouts for the non-equity incentive plan awards for 2017. The Company’s net earnings for 2017 were up 4% as compared to the prior year’s net earnings (excluding all non-recurring adjustments) and, accordingly, Mr. Thomas Florsheim, Jr., Mr. John Florsheim, and Mr. Wittkowske earned 100% of their target bonuses in 2017.

For 2016, a target bonus equal to 45%, 45% and 40% of the annual base salary for Mr. Thomas Florsheim Jr., Mr. John Florsheim and Mr. Wittkowske, respectively, would have been paid had 2016 net earnings increased between 4% and 6% over net earnings in 2015, excluding all non-recurring adjustments. The target bonus was to be pro-rated for increases in net earnings between 0% and 4%. The aforementioned executives would have been eligible for a “stretch” bonus equal to 150% of the target bonus had 2016 net earnings increased 8%. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for earnings increases between 6% and 8%. The Company’s net earnings in 2016 decreased 20% as compared to 2015’s net earnings (excluding all non-recurring adjustments) and, accordingly, Mr. Thomas Florsheim, Jr., Mr. John Florsheim, and Mr. Wittkowske did not earn a cash bonus in 2016.

For 2015, a target bonus equal to 45%, 45% and 40% of the annual base salary for Mr. Thomas Florsheim Jr., Mr. John Florsheim and Mr. Wittkowske, respectively, would have been paid had 2015 net earnings increased between 6% and 9% over net earnings in 2014, excluding all non-recurring adjustments. The target bonus was to be pro-rated for increases in net earnings between 0% and 6%. The aforementioned executives would have been eligible for a “stretch” bonus equal to 150% of the target bonus had 2015 net earnings increased 12%. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for earnings increases between 9% and 12%. The Company’s net earnings in 2015 decreased 7.50% as compared to 2014’s net earnings (excluding all non-recurring adjustments) and, accordingly, Mr. Thomas Florsheim, Jr., Mr. John Florsheim, and Mr. Wittkowske did not earn a bonus in 2015.

The annual cash bonus for Mr. Flannery was based primarily upon the achievement of a pre-determined level of gross margin dollars for his functional division. For 2017, a target bonus equal to 30% of Mr. Flannery’s annual base salary would have been paid had 2017 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased between 5% and 7.5% over the prior year gross margin level. A bonus equal to 25% of Mr. Flannery’s target bonus would have been paid had 2017 gross margin dollars for his functional division been between 98.75% and 100% of the prior year gross margin level, and the bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 0% and 5% over 2016 gross margin dollars. Mr. Flannery was also eligible for a stretch bonus equal to 150% of his target bonus had 2017 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased 10% over the prior year gross margin level. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 7.5% and 10%. 2017 gross margin dollars for Mr. Flannery’s functional division were up approximately 2% over the 2016 gross margin level and, accordingly, Mr. Flannery earned approximately 59% of his target bonus in 2017.

For 2016, a target bonus equal to 30% of Mr. Flannery’s annual base salary would have been paid had 2016 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased between 5% and 7.5% over the prior year gross margin level. A bonus equal to 33% of Mr. Flannery’s target bonus would have been paid had 2016 gross margin dollars for his functional division been between 97% and 100% of the prior year gross margin level,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and the bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 0% and 5% over 2015 gross margin dollars. Mr. Flannery was also eligible for a stretch bonus equal to 150% of his target bonus had 2016 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased 10% over the prior year gross margin level. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 7.5% and 10%. 2016 gross margin dollars for Mr. Flannery’s functional division were 98% of the 2015 gross margin level and, accordingly, Mr. Flannery earned 33% of his target bonus in 2016.

The annual cash bonus for Mr. Schiff was based primarily upon the achievement of a pre-determined level of gross margin dollars for his functional division. For 2017, a target bonus equal to 30% of Mr. Schiff’s annual base salary would have been paid had 2017 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased between 6% and 9% over the prior year gross margin level. The bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 0% and 6% over 2016 gross margin dollars. Mr. Schiff was also eligible for a stretch bonus equal to 150% of his target bonus had 2017 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased 12% over the prior year gross margin level. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 9% and 12%. 2017 gross margin dollars for Mr. Schiff’s functional division were up approximately 8% over the prior year gross margin level and, accordingly, Mr. Schiff earned 100% of his target bonus in 2017.

For 2016, a target bonus equal to 30% of Mr. Schiff’s annual base salary would have been paid had 2016 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased between 6% and 9% over the prior year gross margin level. A bonus equal to 25% of Mr. Schiff’s target bonus would have been paid had 2016 gross margin dollars for his functional division been between 98% and 100% of the prior year gross margin level, and the bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 0% and 6% over 2015 gross margin dollars. Mr. Schiff was also eligible for a stretch bonus equal to 150% of his target bonus had 2016 gross margin dollars for his functional division increased 12% over the prior year gross margin level. The stretch bonus was to be pro-rated for increases between 9% and 12%. 2016 gross margin dollars for Mr. Schiff’s functional division were 98% of the 2015 gross margin level and, accordingly, Mr. Schiff earned 25% of his target bonus in 2016.

See the table titled “Summary Compensation Table” below for the non-equity incentive plan compensation payouts in 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The Committee believes that long-term stock-based awards provide performance incentives that encourage long-term growth in value for public shareholders. Accordingly, discretionary long-term stock-based awards are also an integral part of the Company’s executive compensation program (see “Long-Term Incentive Plan Award Policy” below).

The Company has no formal policy for allocating executive compensation between cash and non-cash or between annual and long-term compensation. Historically, the long-term component of the Company’s executive compensation has been non-cash and has been approximately 20-40% of total compensation, and the Company expects that approximate level to continue going forward.

Each year, management proposes base salaries, cash bonuses and long-term stock based awards for all executive officers, which they provide to the Committee. The Committee reviews each specific element of compensation for each of the executive officers. Similarly, each year, the Company’s management proposes Company-wide financial goals for the determination of annual cash bonuses. Management presents economic, industry and/or Company specific rationales for the proposed financial goals. The Committee reviews and discusses the information with management, and makes the final determination of the Company-wide financial goals for the period.

On January 1, 2017, the Company renewed its employment contracts with Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. and John W. Florsheim. See further details of these contracts in the “Employment Contracts and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” section below.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Award Policy

The Company believes that participation in a long-term incentive program encourages a perspective of ownership by providing an equity stake in the Company. The Company also believes that participation in a long-term incentive program should increase with higher levels of responsibility, as individuals in leadership roles have the greatest influence on the Company’s strategic direction and results over time. Prior to 2014, the Company granted restricted stock and/or stock option awards each year on or about December 1. In 2014, the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Company began granting restricted stock and/or stock option awards each year on or about August 25. Typically, the Company grants a combination of stock options and/or restricted stock awards to executive officers, non-officer key employees, other salaried employees, and directors of the Company.

Beginning in 2017, equity awards were granted under the Weyco Group, Inc. 2017 Incentive Plan. Under the 2017 Incentive Plan, stock options and restricted stock were awarded to the Company’s named executive officers. On the same date, a combination of stock options and shares of restricted stock were awarded to directors, non-executive officers and non-officer key employees, and stock options were awarded to other salaried employees. Under the 2017 Incentive Plan, the exercise price of stock options and restricted stock awards were valued at fair market value based on the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant. Stock options granted in 2017 vest ratably over five years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and expire 10 years from the grant date. Restricted stock awards granted in 2017 vest ratably over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

From 2014 to 2016, equity awards were granted under the Weyco Group, Inc. 2014 Incentive Plan. From 2011 to 2013, equity awards were granted under the Weyco Group, Inc. 2011 Incentive Plan. Under the 2014 and 2011 Incentive Plans, stock options vest ratably over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and expire six years from the grant date; restricted stock awards vest ratably over four years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

Company “insiders,” as defined by the Company, are restricted from buying or selling their shares during four black-out periods surrounding each quarter end.

Risk Management and Compensation

The Company has designed its compensation programs for executive officers and all other employees to not encourage or promote excessive risk-taking. Additionally, the Company’s compensation packages for senior management, executive officers and other key employees include long-term compensation awards which aim to reward performance over the longer term. Therefore, the Company believes that the risks, if any, arising from its compensation policies are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Pay Ratio

The ratio of annual total compensation of the Company’s CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all Company employees was 52:1 in fiscal year 2017. The annual total compensation of the CEO was $1,878,756 and the median of the annual total compensation of all employes — excluding the CEO — was $35,940 in fiscal 2017.

To determine the median compensated employee, the Company reviewed its worldwide employee population, consisting of 626 employees (341 U.S. and 285 non-U.S. employees), and examined the 2017 total compensation for all employees, excluding the CEO, who were employed by the Company as of December 31, 2017. The Company applied the de minimis exemption to exclude all non-U.S. employees in certain jurisdictions that were not representative of the Company’s worldwide employee base across various job levels, which resulted in the exclusion of 3 employees in South Africa and 17 employees in Italy. The Company’s median compensated employee calculation included all permanent employees, whether full-time or part-time, consisting of 341 U.S. employees and 265 non-U.S. employees (an aggregate of 97 percent of total employees), and excluded 20 non-U.S. employees (an aggregate of 3 percent of total employees) from the calculation.

To calculate the annual total compensation of the median compensated employee, the Company used the same methodology as set forth in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement, except for the change in pension value. The change in pension value was excluded from the calculation of annual total compensation of the median employee, but was included in the CEO’s annual total compensation. The Company did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total compensation. The Company believes the use of annual total compensation for all employees is a consistently applied compensation measure as it includes all key elements of employee pay (base salary, equity compensation, and non-equity incentive plan compensation) distributed widely amongst its employees.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth total compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($)				Option Awards ($)				Stock Awards ($)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)				Change in Pension Value ($)(8)				All Other Compensation ($)				Total ($)
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			2017			$	639,500			$	60,750	(1)		$	55,880	(4)		$	287,775	(6)		$	789,248	(9)		$	45,603	(11)		$	1,878,756
			2016			$	627,000			$	97,600	(2)			—				—	(6)		$	402,498	(9)		$	36,456	(11)		$	1,163,554
			2015			$	614,600			$	105,600	(3)			—				—	(6)		$	—	(10)		$	35,087	(11)		$	755,287
John W. Florsheim President, Chief Operating Officer and Assistant Secretary			2017			$	611,500			$	60,750	(1)		$	55,880	(4)		$	275,175	(6)		$	868,947	(9)		$	26,924	(12)		$	1,899,176
			2016			$	599,500			$	97,600	(2)			—				—	(6)		$	465,144	(9)		$	18,957	(12)		$	1,181,201
			2015			$	587,700			$	105,600	(3)			—				—	(6)			—	(10)		$	18,487	(12)		$	711,787
John F. Wittkowske Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary			2017			$	405,000			$	60,750	(1)		$	55,880	(4)		$	162,000	(6)		$	585,093	(9)		$	39,437	(12)		$	1,308,160
			2016			$	393,500			$	97,600	(2)			—				—	(6)		$	293,701	(9)		$	31,590	(12)		$	816,391
			2015			$	378,500			$	105,600	(3)			—				—	(6)			—	(10)		$	30,826	(12)		$	514,926
Brian Flannery Vice President, and President of Stacy Adams Brand			2017			$	333,800			$	30,375	(1)		$	27,940	(4)		$	59,543	(7)		$	230,152			$	11,867	(13)		$	693,677
			2016			$	325,700			$	24,400	(2)		$	30,612	(5)		$	32,244	(7)		$	214,877			$	5,523	(13)		$	633,356
			2015(14)				—				—				—				—				—				—				—
Kevin Schiff Vice President, and President of Florsheim Brand			2017			$	318,100			$	30,375	(1)		$	27,940	(4)		$	95,430	(8)		$	72,292			$	10,890	(13)		$	555,027
			2016			$	310,300			$	24,400	(2)		$	30,612	(5)		$	23,270	(8)		$	77,317			$	3,503	(13)		$	469,402
			2015(14)				—				—				—				—				—				—				—

Notes:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2017

Name		Grant Date				Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards												All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Awards (#)				All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(9)				Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(9)				Aggregate Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
						Threshold ($)				Target ($)				Maximum ($)
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			3/7/2017			$	1	(1)		$	287,775	(1)(2)		$	431,663	(1)(3)			—				—				—				—
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			8/25/2017				—				—				—				—				15,000			$	27.94			$	60,750	(10)
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			8/25/2017				—				—				—				2,000				—				—			$	55,880	(11)
John W. Florsheim			3/7/2017			$	1	(1)		$	275,175	(1)(2)		$	412,763	(1)(3)			—				—				—				—
John W. Florsheim			8/25/2017				—				—				—				—				15,000			$	27.94			$	60,750	(10)
John W. Florsheim			8/25/2017				—				—				—				2,000				—				—			$	55,880	(11)
John F. Wittkowske			3/7/2017			$	1	(1)		$	162,000	(1)(2)		$	243,000	(1)(3)			—				—				—				—
John F. Wittkowske			8/25/2017				—				—				—				—				15,000			$	27.94			$	60,750	(10)
John F. Wittkowske			8/25/2017				—				—				—				2,000				—				—			$	55,880	(11)
Brian Flannery			3/7/2017			$	1	(4)		$	100,140	(4)(5)		$	150,210	(4)(6)			—				—				—				—
Brian Flannery			8/25/2017				—				—				—				—				7,500			$	27.94			$	30,375	(10)
Brian Flannery			8/25/2017				—				—				—				1,000				—				—			$	27,940	(11)
Kevin Schiff			3/7/2017			$	1	(4)		$	95,430	(4)(7)		$	143,145	(4)(8)			—				—				—				—
Kevin Schiff			8/25/2017				—				—				—				—				7,500			$	27.94			$	30,375	(10)
Kevin Schiff			8/25/2017				—				—				—				1,000				—				—			$	27,940	(11)

Notes:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2017

						Option Awards																Stock Awards
Name		Grant Date				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable				Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Option Exercise Price ($)				Option Expiration Date				Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(3)				Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(4)
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			12/1/2012				32,500							$	23.53				12/1/2018
			12/2/2013				40,000							$	28.50				12/2/2019
			8/26/2014				30,000				10,000	(1)		$	27.04				8/26/2020
			8/25/2015				16,000				16,000	(1)		$	25.64				8/25/2021
			8/25/2016				8,000				24,000	(1)		$	25.51				8/25/2022
			8/25/2017								15,000	(2)		$	27.94				8/25/2027				2,000			$	59,440
John W. Florsheim			12/1/2012				32,500							$	23.53				12/1/2018
			12/2/2013				40,000							$	28.50				12/2/2019
			8/26/2014				30,000				10,000	(1)		$	27.04				8/26/2020
			8/25/2015				16,000				16,000	(1)		$	25.64				8/25/2021
			8/25/2016				8,000				24,000	(1)		$	25.51				8/25/2022
			8/25/2017								15,000	(2)		$	27.94				8/25/2027				2,000			$	59,440
John F. Wittkowske			12/1/2012				32,500							$	23.53				12/1/2018
			12/2/2013				40,000							$	28.50				12/2/2019
			8/26/2014				30,000				10,000	(1)		$	27.04				8/26/2020
			8/25/2015				16,000				16,000	(1)		$	25.64				8/25/2021
			8/25/2016				8,000				24,000	(1)		$	25.51				8/25/2022
			8/25/2017								15,000	(2)		$	27.94				8/25/2027				2,000			$	59,440
Brian Flannery			12/1/2012				8,000							$	23.53				12/1/2018
			12/2/2013				10,000							$	28.50				12/2/2019
			8/26/2014				7,500				2,500	(1)		$	27.04				8/26/2020				300			$	8,916
			8/25/2015				5,000				5,000	(1)		$	25.64				8/25/2021				500			$	14,860
			8/25/2016				2,000				6,000	(1)		$	25.51				8/25/2022				900			$	26,748
			8/25/2017								7,500	(2)		$	27.94				8/25/2027				1,000			$	29,720
Kevin Schiff			12/1/2012				2,000							$	23.53				12/1/2018
			12/2/2013				10,000							$	28.50				12/2/2019
			8/26/2014				7,500				2,500	(1)		$	27.04				8/26/2020				300			$	8,916
			8/25/2015				5,000				5,000	(1)		$	25.64				8/25/2021				500			$	14,860
			8/25/2016				2,000				6,000	(1)		$	25.51				8/25/2022				900			$	26,748
			8/25/2017								7,500	(2)		$	27.94				8/25/2027				1,000			$	29,720

Notes:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2017

The following table provides information related to stock options exercised by and restricted stock vested to the named executive officers during 2017.

		Option Awards								Stock Awards
Name		Number of Shares Acquired Upon Exercise (#)				Value Realized Upon Exercise ($)(1)				Number of Shares Acquired Upon Vesting (#)				Value Realized Upon Vesting ($)(2)
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			32,500			$	123,175				—				—
John W. Florsheim			32,500			$	123,175				—				—
John F. Wittkowske			32,500			$	108,550				—				—
Brian Flannery			8,000			$	29,920				1,150			$	31,813
Kevin Schiff			—				—				1,150			$	31,813

Notes:

Pension Benefits

The Company maintains a defined benefit pension plan for various employees of the Company, including salaried employees. The Company also maintains an unfunded supplemental pension plan for key executives so they may receive pension benefits which they would otherwise be prevented from receiving as a result of certain limitations of the Internal Revenue Code. Retirement benefits are provided based on employees’ years of credited service and average earnings or stated amounts for years of service. The plans provide for normal retirement at age 65 and provide for reduced benefits for early retirement beginning at age 55. Pension benefits are payable under a variety of options, to be selected by the retiree and are calculated under a formula which is integrated with Social Security, although the amounts determined under the formula are not reduced by Social Security benefits. The normal retirement benefit is based on (i) the highest average earnings for any 5 consecutive years during the 10 calendar years ending with the year of retirement, (ii) length of service up to 25 years and (iii) the highest average covered compensation for Social Security purposes. Prior to October 1, 2012, earnings covered by the plan were generally defined as wages for purposes of federal income tax withholding and therefore included the value realized upon the exercise of non-qualified stock options and other minor items in addition to those included in the above Summary Compensation Table as “Salary.” Effective October 1, 2012, the plan was amended so as to define earnings to include only salary and cash bonus. Benefit accruals under the plan were frozen effective December 31, 2016.

The foregoing describes the general formula under the defined benefit plan and related excess benefits plan as revised in 1997. Those salaried employees who were covered in the plans on January 1, 1989, and all officers (including the named executive officers) who are Senior Vice Presidents or above are provided with the higher of the benefits described above or a minimum benefit based on a prior formula through the defined benefit plan, the unfunded excess benefits plan described above and an unfunded deferred compensation plan. The normal retirement benefit under the prior formula is based on the highest average earnings for any 5 consecutive years during the 10 calendar years preceding retirement and length of service up to 25 years. The normal retirement benefit for officers (including the named executive officers) who are Senior Vice Presidents or above is based on the highest average earnings for any 5 years during the 20 calendar years preceding retirement and length of service up to 25 years. Minimum benefit amounts are not subject to any deduction for Social Security benefits. Under the excess benefits plan, upon a change in control, a lump sum benefit payment shall be made to each participant.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Effective October 1, 2012, the Company amended its defined benefit pension plan to redefine earnings subject to benefits under the plan. The Company also amended its deferred compensation and excess benefit plans, effective October 1, 2012, to set a maximum benefit payable under the plans and eliminate the enhanced early retirement benefit that was previously provided to executive officers. These changes reduced the collective present values of accumulated benefits for each of the named executive officers under the plans.

The following table provides information related to pension benefits earned by each of the named executive officers based on their number of years of credited service as of December 31, 2017.

Name		Plan Name				Number of Years Credited Service (#)(1)				Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)(2)				Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($)
Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr.			Qualified Pension Plan				25			$	1,071,512			$	0
			Deferred Compensation Plan							$	188,481			$	0
			Excess Benefits Plan							$	4,664,037			$	0
John W. Florsheim			Qualified Pension Plan				24			$	808,553			$	0
			Deferred Compensation Plan							$	164,643			$	0
			Excess Benefits Plan							$	3,447,912			$	0
John F. Wittkowske			Qualified Pension Plan				24			$	943,097			$	0
			Deferred Compensation Plan							$	172,997			$	0
			Excess Benefits Plan							$	3,064,289			$	0
Brian Flannery			Qualified Pension Plan				25			$	947,837			$	0
			Deferred Compensation Plan								—			$	0
			Excess Benefits Plan							$	592,031			$	0
Kevin Schiff			Qualified Pension Plan				10			$	291,844			$	0
			Deferred Compensation Plan								—			$	0
			Excess Benefits Plan							$	99,514			$	0

Notes:

Employment Contracts and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

The Company has entered into employment contracts with Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. and John W. Florsheim whereby, for services to be rendered, their employment will be continued until December 31, 2019, at salary levels to be determined and reviewed periodically. These contracts provide, among other things, that a lump sum amount equal to slightly less than three times his base amount compensation (as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code) will be paid to Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. and John W. Florsheim, respectively, as severance pay, in the event the Company terminates his employment without cause or he terminates his employment following a change of control of the Company. A “change of control” is defined in the employment agreements as: a change in control of more than 15% of the shares of the Company; the replacement of two or more directors by persons not nominated by the Board of Directors; any enlargement of the size of the Board of Directors if the change was not supported by the existing Board of Directors; a merger, consolidation or transfer of assets of the Company; or a substantial change in his responsibilities. In the event Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. or John W. Florsheim is prevented from performing his duties by reason

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of permanent disability, his normal salary will be discontinued and a disability salary of 75% of his then current salary will be paid until December 31, 2019.

Also, in the event Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. or John W. Florsheim dies prior to the termination of his employment under the contract, a death benefit equal to his salary at the annual rate being paid to him at the date of death will be paid to a designated beneficiary for a three-year period. As of March 31, 2018, the annual salary of Thomas W. Florsheim, Jr. is $659,000 and John W. Florsheim’s annual salary is $630,000.

The Company has a change of control agreement with John Wittkowske. This contract provides that a lump sum equal to slightly less than three times his annual compensation (as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code), calculated with respect to the three taxable year period ending before the date the change of control occurs, will be paid as severance pay in the event of a change of control. The change of control agreement defines a “change of control” as an event in which:

As of March 31, 2018, Mr. Wittkowske’s annual salary is $421,000.

In accordance with the terms of the 2017 Incentive Plan, 2014 Incentive Plan and 2011 Incentive Plan, if a change of control should occur, all options and stock awards granted by the Company shall immediately vest.

OTHER INFORMATION

Transactions with Related Persons

The Company’s written Code of Business Ethics provides that, except with the prior knowledge and consent of the Company, directors and employees are not permitted to have a financial interest in a supplier, competitor or customer of the Company because of the potential conflicts of interest raised by such transactions. There is a limited exception for ownership of securities of a publicly traded corporation unless the investments are of a size as to have influence or control over the corporation. The Company’s policies include no minimum size for this restriction on potential conflict of interest transactions. Actual or potential conflict of interest transactions or relationships are to be reported to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer or another officer of the Company. Waivers or exceptions for executive officers or directors may be granted only in advance and under exceptional circumstances and only by the Board of Directors or an appropriate committee.

Transactions with related persons are also subject to the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and requirements of NASDAQ.

There were no transactions since the beginning of 2016, and there are no proposed transactions, in which the Company was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which (a) any director, executive officer, director nominee, or immediate family member of a director, executive officer or nominee, or (b) any holder of 5% or more of the Company’s common stock or their immediate family members, had a direct or indirect material interest.

Method of Proxy Solicitation

The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company. The officers of the Company may solicit proxies from some of the larger shareholders, which solicitation may be made by mail, telephone, or personal contacts; these officers will not receive additional compensation for soliciting such proxies. Request will also be made of brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward, at the expense of the Company, soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under the federal securities laws, the Company’s directors, executive officers and any person holding more than 10% of the Company’s common stock are required to report their initial ownership of the Company’s common stock and any change in that ownership to the SEC. Specific due dates for these reports have been established, and the Company is required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file such reports by these dates during the last year.

The Company believes that all of these filing requirements were satisfied on a timely basis for the year ended December 31, 2017. In making these disclosures, the Company has relied solely on written representations of its directors and executive officers and copies of the reports they have filed with the SEC.

Other Matters

The Company has not been informed and is not aware that any other matters will be brought before the meeting. However, proxies will be voted with discretionary authority with respect to any other matters that properly may be presented to the meeting.

Shareholder Proposals

Under Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, shareholder proposals must be received by the Company no later than December 5, 2018, in order to be considered for inclusion in next year’s annual meeting proxy statement. Further, under the Company’s Guidelines and Criteria for Nomination of Director Candidates, shareholder recommendations for directors must be received by the Company no later than December 2, 2018, in order to be considered by the Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee for nomination and inclusion in next year’s annual meeting proxy statement. In addition, a proposal submitted outside of Rule 14a-8 will be considered untimely, and the Company may use discretionary voting authority for any proposal that may be raised at next year’s annual meeting unless the proponent notifies us of the proposal not later than February 18, 2019.

WEYCO GROUP, INC.

April 4, 2018 Milwaukee, Wisconsin		JOHN F. WITTKOWSKE Secretary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS