UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
o
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
o
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
x
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
o
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
|
Cutera Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
x
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
1)
|
Amount previously paid:
|
|
2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
4)
|
Date Filed:
|
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Commencing on June 5, 2012, Cutera Inc.(“Cutera”) sent the following communication to certain stockholders:
|
Re:
|
Cutera’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders — June 13, 2012 (“Annual Meeting”) Proposal 2- A Non-Binding Advisory Vote on the Approval of Executive Compensation (“Say on Pay”)
|
Dear Stockholder:
We are writing to ask for your support at the Annual Meeting with respect to Proposal 2, or Say on Pay. As you may be aware, Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) has recommended a vote AGAINST this proposal for a few reasons:
|
|
·
|
In 2010, the Company cancelled underwater options held by the CEO and CFO and replaced them with new, at-the-money options
|
|
|
·
|
2011 is the third year of consecutive negative one-, three- and five-year Total Stockholder Returns (“TSRs”) at the Company; and
|
|
|
·
|
A significant portion of CEO pay is not rigorously performance-based.
|
We strongly disagree with ISS’s recommendation, which we believe was based on facts that were misunderstood and which does not adequately take into account the totality of the circumstances applicable to our situation.
As a result, we ask that you vote FOR the approval of our executive compensation program.
First ISS Criteria:
Contrary to ISS’s understanding, in 2010 we did not cancel certain underwater options (i.e. with exercise prices below the then current value of our stock) and grant new options to the CEO and CFO in lieu of the cancellation.
ISS incorrectly believes that the Compensation Committee of Cutera’s Board of Directors granted our President and Chief Executive Officer ─ Mr. Kevin P Connors – and EVP and Chief Financial Officer – Mr. Ronald J. Santilli ─ new options in 2010 in lieu of the cancellation of certain underwater option grants.
|
(a)
|
In 2010 our Compensation Committee approved annual, merit stock options consistent with our historical practices as shown in the table below:
|
-2-
| Year | Number of Stock Options Granted | |||
|
Mr. Connors
|
Mr. Santilli
|
|||
|
2011
|
120,000
|
80,000
|
||
|
2010
|
120,000
|
55,000
|
||
|
2009
|
120,000
|
55,000
|
||
|
2008
|
133,300
|
63,700
|
||
|
|
(b)
|
In determining the 2010 stock option grants, the Company did not request or require the executive officers to return underwater options, i.e. there was not a quid pro quo for returning the underwater stock options.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Rather, our CEO and CFO voluntarily surrendered 95,000 and 57,000, respectively, of underwater stock options to benefit the Company and its stockholders by reducing the stock-based compensation expense associated with these underwater options and to reduce the total stockholder overhang (i.e. shares subject to outstanding awards that could potentially be exercised and sold at a future time in certain circumstances, creating downward pressure on the price).
|
|
|
(d)
|
In 2010, our Compensation Committee granted Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) to our executives for a number of reasons. These equity awards helped offset the significant decline in bonus payouts due to the economic down turn, reduced benefits resulting from the implementation of cost cutting measures and promoted cash conservation. The table below shows compensation for Mr. Connors and Mr. Santilli, other than option-based compensation, for fiscal years 2008 through 2011:
|
|
Name and Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Restricted
Stock Awards
|
All Other
Compensation
|
Total Compensation Excluding Stock Options
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Kevin P. Connors
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 226,365 | $ | 95,920 | $ | 0 | $ | 742,285 | ||||||||||
|
2010
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 337,920 | $ | 0 | $ | 757,920 | ||||||||||
|
2009
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 18,454 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 438,454 | ||||||||||
|
2008
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 53,086 | $ | 0 | $ | 17,669 | $ | 490,755 | ||||||||||
|
Ronald J. Santilli
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 117,389 | $ | 65,400 | $ | 0 | $ | 472,789 | ||||||||||
|
2010
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 225,280 | $ | 0 | $ | 515,280 | ||||||||||
|
2009
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 10,012 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 300,012 | ||||||||||
|
2008
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 28,513 | $ | 0 | $ | 10,350 | $ | 328,863 | ||||||||||
Second ISS Criteria:
Although 2011 is the third year of consecutive negative one-, three- and five-year TSRs at the Company, we are performing better than other companies in our industry and have made other significant operational developments.
While we recognize that the past three years have been challenging for Cutera and our industry, due in part to the significant impact of the global economic recession on our entire industry, we have implemented several key initiatives to improve our revenue, profitability and strategic position:
|
|
·
|
Introduced new products- GenesisPlus in 2010, ExcelV in 2011 and truSculpt in 2012;
|
|
|
·
|
Restructured our sales management organization in 2010 and 2011;
|
|
|
·
|
Implemented three reduction-in-force programs in 2009, specifically targeting positions that were directly impacted by the business slow down;
|
-3-
|
|
·
|
Acquired a competitor- Iridex’s aesthetic business unit- in 2012; and
|
|
|
·
|
Prudently managed the business and maintained a strong balance sheet to ensure the long term success of the Company.
|
Our operational results have also improved. For the fourth consecutive quarter ended on March 31, 2012, we have experienced revenue growth in excess of 22%, compared to the respective periods in the year-ago quarters. ISS has failed to take this improvement in our business performance into account. In addition, ISS’s own report highlights that Cutera has performed significantly better than a peer group of all Russell 3000 health care equipment and services companies that ISS compared us to. The following table has been excerpted from ISS’s proxy report:
|
1-year
|
3-year
|
5-year
|
|||
|
Cutera TSR (%)
|
-10.13
|
-5.65
|
-22.70
|
||
|
Health care equipment and Services Companies’ TSR (GICS 3510) (%)
|
-29.29
|
-10.92
|
-34.02
|
Third ISS Criteria:
Contrary to ISS’s opinion, we believe that a significant portion of CEO pay is performance based compensation.
At Cutera, our Compensation Committee is comprised only of independent board members, is focused on implementing an executive compensation program that is designed to retain key management personnel and link management compensation to the Company's strategic business objectives, specific financial performance and the enhancement of stockholder returns. We believe that the approach adopted by our Compensation Committee achieved the appropriate balance of relevant factors and that it was in the best interests of our stockholders.
|
Base Compensation & Benefits
|
Performance Based Compensation
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name and
Year
|
Salary
|
Benefits
|
Bonus
and
Profit
Sharing
|
Restricted
Stock
Awards
|
Stock
Options
|
Total
(A)
|
Total
Compensation
(B)
|
Performance
Based Compensation as
a % of Total
Compensation (A/B)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kevin P. Connors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 226,365 | $ | 95,920 | $ | 359,508 | $ | 681,793 | $ | 1,101,793 | 62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 337,920 | $ | 391,852 | $ | 729,772 | $ | 1,149,772 | 63 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 18,454 | $ | 0 | $ | 481,284 | $ | 499,738 | $ | 919,738 | 54 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
$ | 420,000 | $ | 17,669 | $ | 53,086 | $ | 0 | $ | 708,145 | $ | 761,231 | $ | 1,198,900 | 63 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Ronald J. Santilli
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 117,389 | $ | 65,400 | $ | 239,672 | $ | 422,461 | $ | 712,461 | 59 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 225,280 | $ | 171,266 | $ | 396,546 | $ | 686,546 | 58 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 0 | $ | 10,012 | $ | 0 | $ | 220,589 | $ | 230,601 | $ | 520,601 | 44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
$ | 290,000 | $ | 10,350 | $ | 28,513 | $ | 0 | $ | 339,765 | $ | 368,278 | $ | 668,628 | 55 | % | ||||||||||||||||
We believe that both our executive bonus plan and equity awards are performance-based compensation. Our long-term incentives fluctuate in value depending on the Company’s performance. With respect to stock options, our executives realize value only if our stockholders realize appreciation in our stock price from the date of grant. Similarly, with RSUs, the value that an executive will realize upon vesting is tied to our stock price at that time, providing alignment with our shareholders and important retention incentives. It should be noted that our executives have not yet realized any actual gain on the May, 2010 option grants that ISS is still questioning. Further, we would point out that these performance-based compensation elements represent a significant portion of our executive compensation (for example, 62%, 63%, 54% and 63% of the total compensation in 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 of Mr. Connors was from bonus and equity awards).
-4-
Our executive bonus payments are based solely on the percentage of revenue growth and the rate of profitability achieved. For more details of the bonus plan, please see the Definitive Proxy filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2012.
In summary, using the information in our proxy statement, the above supplemental information and other public disclosures, we ask that you vote FOR the approval of our executive compensation program at the annual meeting to be held on June 13, 2012.
Signatures
|
By order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
/s/ Kevin P. Connors
|
|
|
Kevin P. Connors
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Brisbane, California
|
|
|
June 5, 2012
|
-5-