UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[ X ] Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
[ ] Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File Number: 001-13387
AeroCentury Corp.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware 94-3263974
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
1440 Chapin Avenue, Suite 310
Burlingame, California 94010
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (650) 340-1888
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value American Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Check whether the Issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
As of August 11, 2004 the Issuer had 1,606,557 Shares of Common Stock
outstanding, of which 63,300 are held as Treasury Stock.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes _ No X
----- -----
PART I
Financial Information
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB includes "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the
Exchange Act. All statements in this Report other than statements of historical
fact are "forward-looking statements" for purposes of these provisions,
including any statements of plans and objectives for future operations and any
statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Statements that
include the use of terminology such as "may," "will," "expects," "plans,"
"anticipates," "estimates," "potential," or "continue," or the negative
thereof, or other comparable terminology are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include: (i) in Item 1 "Financial Statements,"
statements concerning the Company's expectations with respect to the execution
of a promissory note by a former lessee of the Company in the third quarter of
2004; the anticipation that the Company will generate adequate future taxable
income to realize the benefits of all deferred tax assets on the balance sheet;
(ii) in Item 2 "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation --
Liquidity and Capital Resources," statements concerning the Company's belief
that it will continue to be in compliance with its credit facility covenants;
the Company's belief that it will have adequate cash flow to meet its ongoing
operational needs, including credit facility repayments; the Company's belief
that its assumptions used to forecast cash flow are reasonable; the Company's
expectation regarding the long-term decline of lease rentals from its current
portfolio; (iii) in Item 2 "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operation -- Outlook," statements concerning the Company's anticipation with
respect to the cost of maintenance on a DHC-7 aircraft; the Company's belief
that the DHC-7 aircraft will be difficult to remarket and that a substantial
amount of time will pass before the DHC-7 aircraft generate revenue; the
Company's belief that it will have sufficient cash to fund any required
repayments under its credit facility; and the Company's expectations with
respect to the execution of a promissory note by a former lessee of the Company
in the third quarter of 2004 and the adequacy of a $250,000 allowance against
the estimated amount receivable under such note; and (iv) in Item 2
"Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation -- Factors that May
Affect Future Results," statements regarding the Company's belief that it will
have sufficient cash funds to make any payments that are required under the
credit facility due to collateral pool limitations; the anticipated increased
compliance cost created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Company's ability to
fund such increased costs; the Company's anticipated purchase of used aircraft
and concentration on turboprop equipment, the Company's intention to concentrate
on future leases to regional air carriers; the Company's belief that overseas
markets present opportunities; and the Company's belief that it is competitive
because of JMC's experience and operational efficiency in identifying and
obtaining financing for the transaction types desired by regional air carriers.
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and it is
important to note that the Company's actual results could differ materially from
those projected or assumed in such forward-looking statements. Among the factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially are the factors detailed
under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation --
Factors That May Affect Future Results," including general economic conditions,
particularly those that affect the demand for regional aircraft and engines and
the financial status of the Company's primary customers, foreign regional
passenger airlines; the lack of any further disruptions to the air travel
industry similar due to terrorist attacks or wartime hostilities or catastrophic
events; the Company's ability to renew and enlarge its credit facility on
reasonable business terms at or prior to its expiration; the financial
performance of the Company's lessees and their compliance with rental,
maintenance and return conditions under their respective leases; the
availability of suitable aircraft acquisition transactions in the regional
aircraft market; and future trends and results which cannot be predicted with
certainty. The cautionary statements made in this Quarterly Report should be
read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they
appear herein. All forward-looking statements and risk factors included in this
document are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to the
Company as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement or risk factor. You should consult the risk
factors listed from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Item 1. Financial Statements
AeroCentury Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
Unaudited
ASSETS
June 30,
2004
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,641,070
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $250,000 1,978,110
Note receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $391,010 21,670
Aircraft and aircraft engines on operating leases,
net of accumulated depreciation of $23,375,650 66,392,640
Prepaid expenses and other 605,180
---------------
Total assets $ 74,638,670
===============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 429,320
Notes payable and accrued interest 41,803,710
Maintenance reserves and accrued costs 9,053,660
Security deposits 1,742,680
Prepaid rent 202,250
Deferred taxes 2,796,010
---------------
Total liabilities 56,027,630
---------------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding -
Common stock, $.001 par value, 3,000,000 shares
authorized, 1,606,557 shares issued and outstanding 1,610
Paid in capital 13,821,200
Retained earnings 5,292,300
---------------
19,115,110
Treasury stock at cost, 63,300 shares (504,070)
---------------
Total stockholders' equity 18,611,040
---------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 74,638,670
===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
AeroCentury Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Six Months For the Three Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
2004 2003 2004 2003
---- ---- ---- ----
Unaudited Unaudited
Revenues:
Operating lease revenue $ 4,317,530 $ 4,637,600 $ 2,257,730 $ 2,185,660
Other income 114,300 45,360 44,070 21,430
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
4,431,830 4,682,960 2,301,800 2,207,090
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Expenses:
Depreciation 1,744,360 1,680,110 899,290 839,310
Interest 1,124,090 952,670 572,940 441,670
Management fees 959,410 967,630 496,630 480,560
Professional fees and
general and administrative 294,130 298,960 152,950 154,670
Insurance 123,220 119,280 49,200 47,800
Maintenance 92,980 1,837,980 68,200 1,736,980
Bad debt expense - 1,049,910 - 949,910
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
4,338,190 6,906,540 2,239,210 4,650,900
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income/(loss) before taxes 93,640 (2,223,580) 62,590 (2,443,810)
Tax provision/(benefit) 13,410 (807,490) 12,480 (852,610)
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net income/(loss) $ 80,230 $ (1,416,090) $ 50,110 $ (1,591,200)
============== ============= ============= ==============
Weighted average common
shares outstanding 1,543,257 1,543,257 1,543,257 1,543,257
============== ============= ============= ==============
Basic earnings/(loss) per share $ 0.05 $ (0.92) $ 0.03 $ (1.03)
============== ============= ============= ==============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
AeroCentury Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2004 2003
---- ----
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 1,871,960 $ 2,028,420
--------------- ----------------
Investing activities:
Payments received on note receivable - 17,600
Purchase of aircraft and aircraft engines (5,985,590) -
--------------- ----------------
Net cash (used)/provided by investing activities (5,985,590) 17,600
--------------- ----------------
Financing activities:
Issuance of notes payable 5,200,000 -
Repayment of notes payable (4,893,930) (1,723,030)
--------------- ----------------
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities 306,070 (1,723,030)
--------------- ----------------
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents (3,807,560) 322,990
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 9,448,630 8,796,000
--------------- ----------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 5,641,070 $ 9,118,990
=============== ================
During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company paid interest
totaling $1,095,640 and $1,140,950, respectively, and income taxes totaling $680
and $175,200, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Basis of Presentation
AeroCentury Corp. ("AeroCentury"), a Delaware corporation, uses
leveraged financing to acquire leased aircraft assets. The Company purchases
used regional aircraft on lease to foreign and domestic regional carriers.
Financial information for AeroCentury and its wholly-owned subsidiary,
AeroCentury Investments II LLC ("AeroCentury II LLC") (collectively, the
"Company"), is presented on a consolidated basis. All intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(b) Capitalization
In 1998, in connection with the adoption of a stockholder rights plan,
the Company filed a Certificate of Designation, setting forth the rights,
preferences and privileges of a new Series A Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the
plan, the Company issued rights to its stockholders, giving each stockholder the
right to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock for
each share of Common Stock held by the stockholder. Such rights are exercisable
only under certain circumstances concerning a proposed acquisition or merger of
the Company.
As discussed above, AeroCentury is the sole member and manager of
AeroCentury II LLC.
(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents/Deposits
The Company considers highly liquid investments readily convertible
into known amounts of cash, with original maturities of 90 days or less, as cash
equivalents. Because the Company's leases do not restrict the Company's use of
such amounts, cash previously reported as deposits, representing cash balances
held related to maintenance reserves and security deposits, has been
reclassified to cash and cash equivalents.
(d) Aircraft and Aircraft Engines On Operating Leases
The Company's interests in aircraft and aircraft engines are recorded
at cost, which includes acquisition costs. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the aircraft's estimated economic life (generally
assumed to be twelve years from the date of acquisition), to an estimated
residual value based on appraisal.
(e) Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company periodically reviews its portfolio of assets for impairment
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets." Such review
necessitates estimates of current market values, re-lease rents, residual values
and component values. The estimates are based on currently available market data
and are subject to fluctuation from time to time. The Company initiates its
review periodically, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of an asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the expected
future undiscounted cash flows (without interest charges) that the asset is
expected to generate. Any impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount
by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future
operating results which are used in the preparation of projected undiscounted
cash flows and should different conditions prevail, material write downs may
occur.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(f) Loan Commitment and Related Fees
To the extent that the Company is required to pay loan commitment fees
and legal fees in order to secure debt, such fees are amortized over the life of
the related loan.
(g) Maintenance Reserves and Accrued Costs and Security Deposits
Maintenance costs under the Company's triple net leases are generally
the responsibility of the lessees. The accompanying balance sheet reflects
liabilities for maintenance reserves and accrued costs, which include refundable
and non-refundable maintenance payments received from lessees, as well as
security deposits received from lessees. At June 30, 2004, the Company had
accrued liabilities for refundable maintenance reserves of $399,950,
non-refundable maintenance reserves of $7,822,900 and security deposits of
$1,742,680.
Maintenance reserves which are refundable to the lessee at the end of
the lease may be retained by the Company if such amounts are necessary to meet
the return conditions specified in the lease and, in some cases, to satisfy any
other payments due under the lease.
Non-refundable maintenance reserves received by the Company are
accounted for as a liability until the aircraft has been returned at the end of
the lease, at which time the Company evaluates the adequacy of the remaining
reserves in light of maintenance to be performed as a result of hours flown. At
that time, any excess is recorded as income. When an aircraft is sold, any
excess non-refundable maintenance reserves are recorded as income.
The Company periodically reviews maintenance reserves for adequacy in
light of the number of hours flown, airworthiness directives issued by the
manufacturer or government authority, and the return conditions specified in the
lease, as well as the condition of the aircraft upon return or inspection. As a
result of such review, when it is probable that the Company has incurred costs
for maintenance in excess of amounts received from lessees, the Company accrues
its share of costs for work to be performed as a result of hours flown. At June
30, 2004, the Company had accrued maintenance costs, in excess of reserve
amounts received under the leases, of approximately $830,810 related to several
of its aircraft.
The Company's leases are typically structured so that if any event of
default occurs under a lease, the Company may apply all or a portion of the
lessee's security deposit to cure such default. If such application of the
security deposit is made, the lessee typically is required to replenish and
maintain the full amount of the deposit during the remaining term of the lease.
All of the security deposits received by the Company are refundable to the
lessee at the end of the lease, upon satisfaction of all lease terms.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(h) Income Taxes
The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the
tax consequences of "temporary differences" by applying enacted statutory tax
rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The
effect on deferred taxes of a change in the tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date.
(i) Revenue Recognition
Revenue from leasing of aircraft assets is recognized as operating
lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the terms of the applicable lease
agreements. If the Company deems a portion of operating lease revenue as
potentially uncollectible, the Company records an allowance for doubtful
accounts.
(j) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The most significant estimates with regard to these financial
statements are the residual values of the aircraft, the useful lives of the
aircraft, the amount and timing of cash flow associated with each aircraft that
are used to evaluate impairment, if any, accrued maintenance costs in excess of
amounts received from lessees, and the amounts recorded as bad debt allowances.
(k) Comprehensive Income
The Company does not have any comprehensive income other than the
revenue and expense items included in the consolidated statements of income. As
a result, comprehensive income equals net income for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
(l) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued SFAS Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 is effective for guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002. The Company had one guarantee, which was issued prior to
December 31, 2002. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a
liability for the maximum obligation it had assumed under this guarantee and
wrote off the related receivable. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the vendor
waived the amount due, and the Company reversed its accrual.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
(l) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In January 2003, the FASB issued interpretation FIN No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46"), which was subsequently
revised in December 2003 ("FIN 46R"). FIN 46R requires a variable interest
entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is the primary
beneficiary of the entity. A company is a primary beneficiary if it is subject
to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's activities
or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both.
FIN 46R also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that a
company is not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant
variable interest. FIN 46R was applicable immediately to variable interest
entities created after January 31, 2003, and will be effective for all other
existing entities in financial statements for periods ending after December 15,
2004. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements
issued after December 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity
was established. The Company has no interest in any variable interest entity
and, therefore, the full adoption of FIN 46R had no effect on the Company's
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, was effective for exit or disposal activities that were initiated
after December 31, 2002. SFAS 146 addresses significant issues regarding the
recognition, measurement and reporting of costs that are associated with exit
and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that were previously
accounted for under Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 94-3, Liability
Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an
Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The adoption of
this pronouncement had no effect on the Company's financial statements.
SFAS 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equities, addresses how to classify and
measure certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities
(or an asset in some circumstances) and equity. SFAS 150 requirements apply to
issuers' classification and measurement of freestanding financial instruments,
including those that comprise more than one option or forward contract. It
requires that all instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and
equity be classified as a liability and remeasured at fair value on each
reporting date. SFAS 150 was effective immediately for all financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and for the first interim period
beginning after June 15, 2003 for all other instruments. The adoption of SFAS
150 had no impact on the Company's financial statements.
(m) Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously classified as deposits in the accompanying
2003 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to cash and cash equivalents in order to conform to the
presentation of the 2004 unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
2. Aircraft and Aircraft Engines On Operating Leases
At June 30, 2004, the Company owned five deHavilland DHC-8s, two
deHavilland DHC-7s, three deHavilland DHC-6s, one Fairchild Metro III, two
Shorts SD 3-60s, ten Fokker 50s, two Saab 340As and 26 turboprop engines. The
Company acquired four aircraft during the second quarter of 2004. The Company
did not sell any aircraft during the first six months of 2004. As discussed in
Note 7, the Company sold one aircraft and purchased one aircraft in July 2004.
During the second quarter of 2004:
The Company purchased four Fokker 50s and leased them to a regional
carrier which also leases two of the Company's other Fokker 50
aircraft. In connection with the purchase, the leases for the two
original aircraft were extended. The six aircraft have lease terms
which vary from 18 to 30 months.
The lease for one of the Company's deHavilland DHC-6 aircraft was
extended for two years, through April 2006.
The leases for two of the Company's other deHavilland DHC-6 aircraft
were extended from their expiration dates of April 2004 and June 2004
to July 2004. In the third quarter of 2004, the leases were extended
for 60 months, through July 2009.
One of the Company's Shorts SD 3-60 aircraft was returned by the
lessee, after expiration of the lease. The Company is seeking re-lease
opportunities for this aircraft.
The lease for 24 of the Company's turboprop engines was extended from
April 2004 through June 2004 and subsequently extended through December
2004.
The Company received notice from the lessee of its Fairchild Metro III
aircraft that the lessee had filed for bankruptcy protection in Canada.
The lessee has informed the Company that it intends to pay all amounts
due after the filing date. At June 30, 2004, the lessee owed
maintenance reserves of $11,320 attributable to periods before that
date. The Company holds a security deposit of $25,890 from the lessee.
At June 30, 2004, two of the Company's aircraft and two of its
turboprop engines were off-lease. As discussed in Note 7, in July 2004, the
Company sold one aircraft and signed a term sheet for the sale of an engine. The
Company is seeking re-lease or sale opportunities for the remaining off-lease
aircraft and engine.
The lease for one of the Company's Fokker 50 aircraft expired in
September 2002, but the lessee was obligated under the lease to continue to pay
rent until certain return conditions were met. The Company and the lessee have
agreed to certain terms and conditions regarding the return of the aircraft and
the amounts owed by the lessee. Although the Company held a security deposit
from this lessee, the amount of the deposit was not sufficient to pay the rent
accrued through the return date and reimburse the Company for maintenance work
which has been performed to meet the return conditions of the lease. The lessee
has agreed to deliver a note in 2004, with a principal amount equal to the rent
and maintenance in excess of the security deposit. The required maintenance has
been performed and the Company has determined that the amount of the note should
be approximately $780,000. The Company has recorded a $250,000 allowance against
the amount receivable and believes that such allowance is adequate to cover any
shortfall in payment under the note. The Company expects that the note will be
signed in the third quarter of 2004. The aircraft was delivered to a new lessee
in September 2003.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
2. Aircraft and Aircraft Engines On Operating Leases (continued)
At June 30, 2004, the lessee of two of the Company's Fokker 50 aircraft
owed rent and maintenance reserves totaling $558,220 to the Company. In July
2004, the Company and the lessee signed lease amendments which provide for
repayment of the arrearage in two payments in July and August 2004, a reduction
of the rent beginning in July 2004, combined with a deferral to 2005 of a
portion of the rent due through 2004, and the extension of the leases for 24
months, through October 2008 and December 2007. The Company received the first
arrearage payment in July 2004.
3. Note Receivable
During the third quarter of 2003, the Company's two DHC-7 aircraft were
returned to the Company by a defaulted lessee, and a settlement agreement was
reached with the lessee in the amount of $500,000. The lessee paid $20,000 to
the Company at the time of the settlement and signed a note in the amount of
$480,000. The Company recorded an allowance for the full amount of the note and
recorded income as note payments were received. The Company has entered into an
agreement with a third party, who assisted the Company in the protection,
management and recovery of the Company's assets from the lessee, which provides
that the third party receives 40% of all amounts collected under the note. In
the first quarter of 2004, based on the lessee's timely payment history on the
note thus far, the Company reversed 5% of the remaining allowance and recorded
it as income. The Company also recorded the related expense for the amount
payable to the third party. The Company will continue to monitor the lessee's
payment history and may reverse additional portions of the allowance as the
Company deems appropriate.
4. Notes Payable and Accrued Interest
(a) Credit facility
In August 2003, the Company reached agreement with its lenders to
extend the maturity date of its credit facility from August 28, 2003 to August
31, 2004. The facility bears interest, at the Company's option, at either (i)
prime plus a margin of 50 to 150 basis points or (ii) LIBOR plus a margin of 275
to 375 basis points. Both the prime and LIBOR margins are determined by certain
financial ratios.
In January 2004, a new bank was added to the Company's credit facility
participant group. The new participant agreed to finance $10 million, bringing
the Company's credit facility limit to $50 million.
In April and July 2004, the Company repaid $4,000,000 and $300,000 of
the outstanding principal under its credit facility.
In accordance with the agreement for the credit facility, the Company
must maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, such as a requirement
for positive quarterly earnings, bank approval of new leases and a net worth
ratio. As of June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants,
$39,605,000 was outstanding under the credit facility, and interest of $159,700
was accrued.
The Company's longer term viability will depend upon its ability to
renew the credit facility at its expiration with the existing or replacement
lenders, or to refinance the credit facility using equity or alternative debt
financing. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve either
alternative prior to the currently scheduled expiration of the credit line on
August 31, 2004.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
4. Notes Payable and Accrued Interest (continued)
If the Company is not able to renew the credit facility for the full
outstanding amount, and cannot find suitable alternative financing, it may be
required to make a principal repayment of the outstanding balance, or that
portion of the balance for which replacement financing is not obtained. The
Company does not have sufficient cash reserves to make a repayment of a
significant portion of the outstanding credit facility indebtedness and would be
forced to sell assets in order to raise funds to make such repayment. Such sales
would likely not be on favorable terms to the Company as the full market value
of the assets sold may not be realized by the Company in order to expedite the
consummation of the sales.
Even if the Company is able to successfully sell a portion of its
assets and use the proceeds to repay the credit line facility, if a renewed or
replacement facility is not obtained, the Company's future ability to acquire
assets would be significantly impaired, as the credit facility is the Company's
primary means of financing acquisitions and no other sources of acquisition
financing are immediately available. Thus the renewal or replacement of the
Company's credit line facility in an amount equal to or greater than the current
$50 million limit will be critical to the Company's future operations.
(b) Special purpose financing
In September 2000, the Company acquired a deHavilland DHC-8 aircraft
using cash and bank financing separate from its credit facility. The financing
resulted in a note obligation, as amended, in the amount of $3,575,000, due
April 15, 2006, which bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3%. The
note is collateralized by this aircraft and is non-recourse to the Company.
Payments due under the note consist of monthly principal and interest and a
balloon principal payment due on the maturity date. The financing also provides
for a six month remarketing period at the expiration or earlier termination of
the lease. Payments due on the financing are reduced during this remarketing
period and the balloon principal payment is due at the end of the six month
period. The balance of the note payable at June 30, 2004 was $2,036,670 and
interest of $2,340 was accrued. As of June 30, 2004, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants of this note obligation.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
5. Income Taxes
The items comprising income tax expense/(benefit) are as follows:
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2004 2003
---- ----
Current tax provision:
Federal $ - $ 185,660
State 1,850 11,260
---------------- ---------------
Current tax provision 1,850 196,920
---------------- ---------------
Deferred tax provision/(benefit):
Federal 31,210 (945,170)
State (19,650) (59,240)
---------------- ---------------
Deferred tax provision/(benefit) 11,560 (1,004,410)
---------------- ---------------
Total provision/(benefit) for income taxes $ 13,410 $ (807,490)
================ ===============
Total income tax expense/(benefit) differs from the amount that would
be provided by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to pretax earnings
as illustrated below:
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
2004 2003
---- ----
Income tax expense/ at statutory federal income tax rate $ 31,840 $ (756,020)
State tax expense, net of federal benefit 1,350 (9,750)
Tax rate differences (19,780) (41,720)
---------------- ---------------
Total income tax expense $ 13,410 $ (807,490)
================ ===============
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
5. Income Taxes (continued)
Temporary differences and carryforwards that gave rise to a significant
portion of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2004 are as
follows:
Deferred tax assets:
Bad debt allowance $ 220,160
Deferred maintenance 366,780
Maintenance reserves 2,585,940
Net operating loss carryovers 228,840
Prepaid rent and other 69,740
----------------
Deferred tax assets 3,471,460
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation on aircraft and aircraft engines (6,028,260)
Unearned income (51,110)
Other (188,100)
----------------
Net deferred tax liabilities $ (2,796,010)
================
No valuation allowance is deemed necessary, as the Company anticipates
generating adequate future taxable income to realize the benefits of all
deferred tax assets on the balance sheet. Net operating loss carryovers may be
carried forward twenty years and begin to expire in 2024.
6. Related Party Transactions
Since the Company has no employees, the Company's portfolio of leased
aircraft assets is managed and administered under the terms of a management
agreement with JetFleet Management Corp. ("JMC"), which is an integrated
aircraft management, marketing and financing business and a subsidiary of
JetFleet Holding Corp. ("JHC"). Certain officers of the Company are also
officers of JHC and JMC and hold significant ownership positions in both JHC and
the Company. Under the management agreement, JMC receives a monthly management
fee based on the net asset value of the assets under management. JMC may also
receive an acquisition fee for locating assets for the Company, provided that
the aggregate purchase price, including chargeable acquisition costs and any
acquisition fee, does not exceed the fair market value of the asset based on
appraisal, and a remarketing fee in connection with the sale or re-lease of the
Company's assets. The management fees, acquisition fees and remarketing fees may
not exceed the customary and usual fees that would be paid to an unaffiliated
party for such services. The Company recorded management fees of $959,410 and
$967,630 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The
Company paid an acquisition fee of $260,000 to JMC in April 2004 in connection
with the Company's purchase of four aircraft. Because the Company did not
acquire any aircraft during the first six months of 2003, no acquisition fees
were paid to JMC. No remarketing fees were accrued to JMC during the first six
months of 2004 or 2003.
AeroCentury Corp.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2004
Unaudited
7. Subsequent Events
In July 2004, the Company sold one of its DHC-7 aircraft. The Company
recorded a loss of approximately $68,000 in connection with the sale and paid a
remarketing fee of $46,500 to JMC. The Company is disputing an overcharge of
approximately $66,000 of maintenance charges for the aircraft with the vendor.
The Company is negotiating a reduction of all or part of this amount, which
reduction would decrease the loss on sale.
In July 2004, the Company used cash to purchase a DHC-8-aircraft, which
is on lease to a regional airline in the Caribbean for a term expiring in
November 2007. The Company's banks are in the process of reviewing the
transaction for inclusion in the credit facility borrowing base.
As discussed in Note 2, the leases for four of the Company's aircraft
and 24 of its turboprop engines were extended to various dates.
In July 2004, the Company repaid $300,000 of the outstanding principal
under its credit facility.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
Overview
The Company is a lessor of turboprop aircraft and engines which are used by
customers pursuant to triple net operating leases. The acquisition of such
equipment is generally made using debt financing. The Company's profitability
and cash flow are dependent in large part upon its ability to acquire equipment,
obtain and maintain favorable lease rates on such equipment, and re-lease owned
equipment that comes off lease. The Company is subject to the credit risk of its
lessees, both as to collection of rent and to performance by the lessees of
obligations for maintaining the aircraft. Since lease rates for assets in the
Company's portfolio generally decline as the assets age, the Company's ability
to maintain revenue and earnings over the medium and long term is dependent upon
the Company's ability to grow its asset portfolio.
The Company's principal expenditures are for interest costs on its financing,
management fees, and maintenance of its aircraft assets. Maintenance
expenditures are generally incurred only when aircraft are off lease, are being
prepared for re-lease, or require maintenance in excess of lease return
conditions.
The most significant non-cash expenses include accruals of maintenance costs to
be borne by the Company and aircraft depreciation, both of which are the result
of significant estimates. Maintenance expenses are estimated and accrued based
upon utilization of the aircraft. Depreciation is recognized based upon the
estimated residual value of the aircraft at the end of their estimated lives.
Deviation from these estimates could have a substantial effect on the Company's
cash flow and profitability.
Critical Accounting Policies
In response to the Securities and Exchange Commission's Release No. 33-8040,
"Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies," the
Company has identified the most critical accounting policies upon which its
financial status depends. It determined the critical policies by considering
those that involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. The
Company identified these policies to be those related to valuation of aircraft,
depreciation policies, maintenance reserves and accrued costs and lease rental
revenue recognition.
a. Use of Estimates
In preparing its financial statements, as well as in evaluating future cash
flow, the Company makes significant estimates, including the residual values of
the aircraft, the useful lives of the aircraft, the amount and timing of cash
flow associated with each aircraft that are used to evaluate impairment, if any,
accrued maintenance costs in excess of amounts received from lessees, and
amounts recorded as bad debt allowances. Actual results will likely vary from
estimates.
Historically, the Company has realized at least its carrying value on the sale
of any asset. However, in 2000, the Company recognized an impairment on two of
its assets as a result of third party valuations.
The Company continually evaluates both short and long term maintenance expected
to be required for each of its aircraft, including the estimated cost thereof,
and compares it to the maintenance reserves established for each aircraft. With
respect to estimated maintenance costs, the Company has found its accruals to be
generally accurate, except in two occurrences in which the Company was required
to recognize additional expense: (1) a circumstance in 2003 where a defaulted
lessee failed to perform substantial maintenance required under the lease and
(2) in 2001, the Company accrued an estimate related to compensation to be paid
to the lessee of two aircraft, based on the maintenance-related return
provisions of the leases. In the latter circumstance, the two aircraft were
returned in 2002, at which time the final amount of compensation was determined
and the Company reversed a portion of its accrual, which represented the amount
of the Company's estimate in excess of the final amount, resulting in an
increase in the Company's earnings.
b. Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The Company periodically reviews its portfolio of assets for impairment in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets." Such review
necessitates estimates of current market values, re-lease rents, residual values
and component values. The estimates are based on currently available market data
and third-party appraisals and are subject to fluctuation from time to time. The
Company initiates its review periodically, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of an asset is measured by comparison of its
carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows (without interest
charges) that the asset is expected to generate. Any impairment to be recognized
is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its
fair market value. Significant management judgment is required in the
forecasting of future operating results which are used in the preparation of
projected undiscounted cash flows and should different conditions prevail,
material write downs may occur.
c. Depreciation Policies
The Company's interests in aircraft and aircraft engines are recorded at cost,
which includes acquisition costs. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the aircraft's estimated economic life (generally
assumed to be twelve years from the date of acquisition), to an estimated
residual value based on appraisal.
d. Maintenance Reserves and Accrued Costs
Maintenance costs under the Company's triple net leases are generally the
responsibility of the lessees. Maintenance reserves and accrued costs in the
accompanying balance sheet include refundable and non-refundable maintenance
payments received from lessees. The Company periodically reviews maintenance
reserves for each of its aircraft for adequacy in light of the number of hours
flown, airworthiness directives issued by the manufacturer or government
authority, and the return conditions specified in the lease, as well as the
condition of the aircraft upon return or inspection. As a result of such review,
if it is probable that the Company has incurred costs for maintenance in excess
of amounts received from lessees, the Company accrues its share of costs for
work to be performed.
e. Revenue Recognition
Revenue from leasing of aircraft assets is recognized as operating lease revenue
on a straight-line basis over the terms of the applicable lease agreements. If
the Company deems a portion of operating lease revenue as potentially
uncollectible, the Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts.
Results of Operations
a. Revenues
Operating lease revenue was approximately $320,000 lower in the six months ended
June 30, 2004, versus the same period in 2003, primarily because of lower
overall lease rates and certain aircraft off-lease during 2004. These decreases,
totaling approximately $812,000, were partially offset by an increase of
approximately $492,000 resulting from aircraft purchased during April 2004 and
the re-lease in 2003 and 2004 of several aircraft which had been off lease in
early 2003. Operating lease revenue was approximately $72,000 higher in the
three months ended June 30, 2004 versus 2003 primarily because of the combined
effect, totaling approximately $412,000, of operating lease revenue from
aircraft purchased during April 2004 and the re-lease in 2003 and 2004 of
several aircraft which had been off lease in the second quarter of 2003 or
leased at lower rates in 2003. These increases were partially offset by lower
lease rates for aircraft re-leased since June 30, 2003 and aircraft off-lease
during the second quarter of 2004, the effect of which was a total of
approximately $340,000. Other income was approximately $69,000 and $23,000
higher in the six months and three months, respectively, ended June 30, 2004
versus the same periods in 2003 because of note payments received from a former
lessee on a fully reserved note and because, in the first quarter of 2004, based
on the lessee's payment history to date, the Company reversed a portion of the
allowance equal to 5% of the note balance. The Company continues to monitor the
lessee's payment timeliness and evaluates further reversals of the allowance as
the Company deems appropriate.
b. Expense items
Depreciation was approximately $64,000 and $60,000 higher in the six months and
three months ended June 30, 2004 versus the same periods in 2003, respectively,
primarily because of the purchase of four aircraft in April 2004.
Interest expense was approximately $171,000 and $131,000 higher in the six
months and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, versus the same
periods in 2003 primarily as a result of higher average interest rates arising
from the renegotiation of the Company's credit facility in the third quarter of
2003.
Management fees were approximately $8,000 lower in the six month period of 2004
as a result of normal portfolio depreciation which was only partially offset by
the effect of the aircraft purchased in April 2004. Management fees were
approximately $16,000 higher in the three month period of 2004 as a result of
the April 2004 purchases.
Professional fees and general and administrative expenses and insurance expense
were approximately the same in the six month and three month periods of both
years.
Maintenance expense was approximately $1,745,000 and $1,669,000 lower in the six
month and three month periods, respectively, in 2004 versus 2003, primarily as a
result of the default on three leases and subsequent return of the aircraft by a
Haitian carrier in 2003 and the maintenance required to make the aircraft ready
for re-lease or sale.
Bad debt expense was $1,050,000 and $950,000 lower in the six month and three
month periods, respectively of 2004 versus 2003 due to amounts written off in
connection with the Haitian default described above, as well as a write-off of
accrued rent and estimated maintenance work performed in connection with the
end-of-lease return of an aircraft from a Brazilian regional air carrier in
2003.
The Company's effective tax rates in the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
were approximately 14% and 36%, respectively. The change in rate was primarily a
result of the recognition of tax benefits relating to different state tax rates
than had been accrued in prior years. Since the Company incurred a loss for the
six month period ended June 30, 2003, the recognition of the tax benefits
related to reduced state tax rates increased the Company's tax benefit from the
loss and its effective tax rate. In contrast, the Company had income for the six
month period ended June 30, 2004, so that the recognition of tax benefits
related to the reduced state tax rates decreased the Company's effective tax
rate. For the three month period ending June 30, 2004 and 2003 the Company's
effective tax rates were 20% and 35%, respectively. Since the Company incurred a
loss for the three month period ended June 30, 2003 the recognition of the tax
benefits related to reduced state tax rates increased the Company's tax benefit
from the loss and its effective tax rate for the three month period. Conversely,
the Company had income for the three month period ended June 30, 2004, so that
the recognition of tax benefits related to the reduced state tax rates decreased
the Company's effective tax rate for the three month period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company is currently financing its assets primarily through credit facility
borrowings, special purpose financing and excess cash flow.
a. Credit facility
In August 2003, the Company reached agreement with its lenders to extend the
maturity date of its credit facility from August 28, 2003 to August 31, 2004.
The facility bears interest, at the Company's option, at either (i) prime plus a
margin of 50 to 150 basis points or (ii) LIBOR plus a margin of 275 to 375 basis
points. Both the prime and LIBOR margins are determined by certain financial
ratios. Because the Company's credit facility expires August 31, 2004, the
Company currently pays interest based on the prime rate.
In January 2004, a new bank was added to the Company's credit facility
participant group. The new participant agreed to finance $10 million, bringing
the Company's credit facility limit to $50 million.
In accordance with the agreement for the credit facility, the Company must
maintain compliance with certain financial covenants, such as a requirement for
positive quarterly earnings, bank approval of new leases and a net worth ratio.
As of June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants,
$39,605,000 was outstanding under the credit facility, and interest of $159,700
was accrued. In April and July 2004, the Company repaid $4,000,000 and $300,000,
respectively, of the outstanding principal under its credit facility. Based on
its current projections, the Company believes it will continue to be in
compliance with all covenants of its credit facility, but there can be no
assurance that the Company will do so. See "Factors That May Affect Future
Results - 'Credit Facility Obligations' and 'Risks of Debt Financing'," below.
The Company's interest expense in connection with the credit facility generally
moves up or down with the prevailing interest rates, as the Company has not
entered into any interest rate hedge transactions for the credit facility
indebtedness. Because aircraft owners seeking financing generally can obtain
financing through either leasing transactions or traditional secured debt
financings, prevailing interest rates are a significant factor in determining
market lease rates, and market lease rates generally move up or down with
prevailing interest rates, assuming supply and demand of the desired equipment
remain constant. However, because lease rates for the Company's assets typically
are fixed under existing leases, the Company normally does not experience any
positive or negative impact in revenue from changes in market lease rates due to
interest rate changes until existing leases have terminated.
b. Special purpose financing
In September 2000, the Company acquired a deHavilland DHC-8 aircraft using cash
and bank financing separate from its credit facility. The financing resulted in
a note obligation, as amended, in the amount of $3,575,000, due April 15, 2006,
which bears interest at the rate of one-month LIBOR plus 3%. The note is
collateralized by this aircraft and is non-recourse to the Company. Payments due
under the note consist of monthly principal and interest and a balloon principal
payment due on the maturity date. The financing also provides for a six month
remarketing period at the expiration or earlier termination of the lease.
Payments due on the financing are reduced during this remarketing period and the
balloon principal payment is due at the end of the six month period. The balance
of the note payable at June 30, 2004 was $2,036,670 and interest of $2,340 was
accrued. As of June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants
of this note obligation.
The availability of special purpose financing in the future will depend on
several factors including (1) the availability of funds to be used for the
equity portion of the financing, (2) the type of asset being financed and (3)
the creditworthiness of the underlying lessee. The availability of funds for the
equity portion of the financing will be dependent on the Company's cash flow, as
discussed in "Cash Flow," below.
c. Cash flow
The Company's primary source of revenue is lease rentals of its aircraft assets.
It is the Company's policy to monitor each lessee's needs in periods before
leases are due to expire. If it appears that a customer will not be renewing its
lease, the Company immediately initiates marketing efforts to locate a potential
new lessee or purchaser for the aircraft. The goal of this procedure is to
reduce the time that an asset will be off lease. The Company's aircraft are
subject to leases with varying expiration dates through July 2009.
Management believes that the Company will have adequate cash flow to meet its
ongoing operational needs, including required repayments under its credit
facility, based upon (i) its estimates of future revenues and expenditures and
(ii) the expectation that the credit facility will be renewed on or before
expiration. The Company's expectations concerning such cash flows are based on
existing lease terms and rents, as well as numerous estimates, including (1)
rents on assets to be re-leased, (2) sale proceeds of certain assets currently
under lease, (3) the cost and anticipated timing of maintenance to be performed
and (4) acquisition of additional aircraft and the lease thereof at favorable
lease terms. While the Company believes that the assumptions it has made in
forecasting its cash flow are reasonable in light of experience, actual results
could deviate from such assumptions. Among the more significant external factors
outside the Company's control that could have an impact on the accuracy of cash
flow assumptions are (i) an increase in interest rates that negatively affects
the Company's GAAP profitability and causes the Company to violate covenants of
its credit facility, requiring repayment of some or all of the amounts
outstanding under its credit facility, (ii) lessee non-performance or
non-compliance with lease obligations (which may affect credit line collateral
limitations as well as revenue and expenses) and (iii) an unexpected
deterioration of demand for aircraft equipment beyond what the Company has
assumed.
(i) Operating activities
The Company's cash flow from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004
versus the six months ended June 30, 2003 decreased by approximately $156,000.
The change in cash flow is a result of changes in several cash flow items during
the period, including principally the following:
Lease rents, maintenance reserves and security deposits
Lease rental collections were approximately the same in the six months ended
June 30, 2004 versus the six months ended June 30, 2003. It is expected that
rental rates on aircraft to be re-leased will continue to decline, so that,
absent additional acquisitions by the Company, lease rentals for the current
portfolio can be expected to decline over the long term.
Payments received from lessees for maintenance reserves increased by
approximately $110,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2004 versus the same
period in 2003, reflecting principally an increase in usage by lessees of the
aircraft that are owned and on lease by the Company. Security deposits collected
from lessees increased by approximately $180,000 in 2004 primarily as a result
of the deposit received from the purchaser of one of the Company's DHC-7
aircraft, which was sold in July 2004, and the deposits received in connection
with the purchase of four aircraft in April 2004.
Expenditures for maintenance
Expenditures for maintenance were approximately $430,000 more in the six months
ended June 30, 2004 than in the six months ended June 30, 2003 primarily as a
result of the payment of a portion of maintenance accruals recorded in 2003 in
connection with the return of three aircraft from a lessee declared in default
of its obligations.
Professional fees and general and administrative and aircraft insurance
Expenditures for professional fees were approximately $120,000 higher during the
six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003,
principally as a result of higher legal expense related to aircraft re-leased in
late 2003 and 2004. Expenditures for aircraft insurance increased by
approximately $220,000 in 2004 versus 2003, primarily as a result of higher
prepayments, which are based on the Company's off-lease aircraft at the time of
the policy's renewal in April of each year, due under the Company's insurance
policy. Actual insurance expense depends on the aircraft which are off lease in
any given period.
Expenditures for interest
Expenditures for interest expense decreased by approximately $70,000 in the six
months ended June 30, 2004 versus the six months ended June 30, 2003. Although
interest expense increased from 2003 to 2004 as a result of the renegotiation of
the Company's credit facility in the third quarter of 2003, the increased
payment was a result of the Company having higher accrued interest at the end of
2002 versus 2003, which amount was paid during 2003. Interest expenditures in
future periods will be a product of prevailing interest rates and the
outstanding principal balance on financings, which may be influenced by future
acquisitions and/or required repayments resulting from changes in the collateral
base.
Income taxes
Current income tax payments decreased by approximately $173,000, as a result of
decreased taxable income, resulting from increased depreciation on aircraft
acquired in 2004, increased interest deductions primarily as a result of higher
average interest rates arising from the renegotiation of the Company's credit
facility in the third quarter of 2003, and increased maintenance expense related
to off-lease aircraft. In addition, decreased lease revenue during 2004
contributed to the decrease in taxable income. The effect of these items was
partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense from year to year.
(ii) Investing activities
The increase in cash flow used for investing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2003 versus the same period in 2004 was primarily due to the Company's
purchase of four aircraft in April 2004.
(iii) Financing activities
Although the Company borrowed $5,200,000 on its credit facility to fund the
purchase of four aircraft in April 2004, it also repaid approximately $3,171,000
more of its outstanding debt in the six months ended June 30, 2004 than it
repaid in 2003, resulting in an increase in cash provided by financing
activities of approximately $2,029,000.
Outlook
The Company continually monitors the financial condition of its lessees in order
to minimize the likelihood of significant defaults. In particular, the Company
is currently monitoring (i) both the financial position as well as the
operations of a startup airline which leases two of its aircraft, (ii) the
reorganization efforts of a lessee of another of its aircraft that has recently
filed a reorganization plan, and (iii) the performance of a lessee of two of the
Company's aircraft, the leases for which were recently amended to remedy an
arrearage of rent. Any further weakening in the aircraft industry may also
affect the performance of lessees that currently appear creditworthy. See
"Factors that May Affect Future Results - General Economic Conditions," below.
Although the Company purchased four aircraft in April 2004 and one aircraft in
July 2004, additional acquisitions of leased assets will be necessary to offset
the anticipated decreased lease rates which will result from the re-lease of the
Company's current portfolio. The Company's banks are in the process of reviewing
the July acquisition transaction for inclusion of the purchased aircraft in the
credit facility collateral base. Until the banks approve the acquired aircraft
for inclusion in the collateral base, the Company's ability to borrow could be
affected, which would affect the Company's results.
The Company continues to review its asset valuations in light of the worldwide
economic downturn. Although the Company did not make any valuation adjustments
during 2003, any future adjustments, if necessary, would negatively affect the
Company's financial results and the collateral available for the Company's
credit facility. In addition, the Company's periodic review of the adequacy of
its maintenance reserves, as well as routine and manufacturer-required
maintenance for any off-lease aircraft, may result in changes to estimated
maintenance expense, further reducing earnings.
Maintenance on one of the three aircraft which were returned early by a
defaulted lessee was completed and the aircraft was delivered to a new lessee in
the first quarter of 2004. Maintenance on one of the other two returned assets,
both of which are DHC-7 aircraft, was completed in the third quarter of 2004 and
the aircraft was sold. Maintenance on the second DHC-7 aircraft has begun and is
expected to be complete in the third quarter of 2004. In the second quarter of
2004, the Company accrued an additional $20,000 for maintenance to be performed
on this aircraft and believes that the total accrued to date is sufficient. The
Company believes that the aircraft, once ready, will be relatively difficult to
remarket based on prior experience with this type of aircraft. Therefore, the
Company anticipates that a substantial amount of time may pass before this
aircraft returns to revenue-generating status. See "Factors that May Affect
Future Results - Remarketing of Repossessed Dash 7 Aircraft," below.
As a result of depreciation and collateral restrictions of aircraft leases
expiring in 2004, the Company may be required to make principal repayments under
its credit facility. A focus of the Company, therefore, will be on re-leasing
aircraft that come off lease to limit the amount of any required repayment.
Management believes that the Company will have sufficient cash to fund any
required repayments.
The former Brazilian lessee of a Fokker 50 aircraft has agreed to deliver a
note, with a principal amount equal to the rent and maintenance in excess of the
security deposit held by the Company. The required maintenance has been
performed and the Company has determined that the amount of the note should be
approximately $780,000. The Company has recorded a $250,000 allowance against
the amount receivable and believes this allowance is adequate to cover any
shortfall in payment under the note. The Company expects that the note will be
signed in the third quarter of 2004.
Factors that May Affect Future Results
Term of Credit Facility. As discussed in "Outlook" above, the term of the credit
facility was extended for one year, until August 31, 2004. The Company's longer
term viability will depend upon its ability to renew the credit facility at its
expiration with the existing or replacement lenders, or to refinance the credit
facility using equity or alternative debt financing. There is no assurance that
the Company will be able to achieve either alternative prior to the currently
scheduled expiration of the credit line on August 31, 2004.
If the Company is not able to renew the credit facility for the full outstanding
amount, and cannot find suitable alternative financing, it may be required to
repay the outstanding balance, or that portion of the balance for which
replacement financing is not obtained. The Company does not have sufficient cash
reserves to make a repayment of a significant portion of the outstanding credit
facility indebtedness and would be forced to sell assets in order to raise funds
to make such repayment. Such sales would likely not be on favorable terms to the
Company as the full market value of the assets sold may not be realized by the
Company in order to expedite the consummation of the sales.
In any event, if a renewed or replacement facility is not obtained, the
Company's future ability to acquire assets will be significantly impaired, as
the credit facility is the Company's primary means of financing acquisitions and
no other sources of acquisition financing are immediately available. Thus the
renewal or replacement of the Company's credit line facility in an amount equal
or greater than the current $50 million limit will be critical to the Company's
asset and revenue growth. The approval of the banks for the inclusion of the
aircraft purchased by the Company in July 2004 in the credit facility collateral
base will be a critical factor in the Company's ability to acquire additional
assets in the short term. If such approval is not received, it is likely the
Company will not be able to acquire any assets unless the credit facility is
enlarged. See "Outlook," above.
Credit Facility Obligations. The Company is obligated to make repayment of
principal under the credit facility in order to maintain certain debt ratios
with respect to its assets in the collateral pool. Assets that come off lease
and remain off-lease for a period of time are removed from the collateral pool.
The Company believes it will have sufficient cash funds to make any payment that
arises due to collateral pool limitations caused by assets coming off lease in
the near term. The Company's belief is based on certain assumptions regarding
renewal of existing leases, a lack of extraordinary interest rate increases,
continuing GAAP profitability, no lessee defaults or bankruptcies, and certain
other matters that the Company deems reasonable in light of its experience in
the industry.
An increase in interest rates, among other factors, that negatively affects the
Company's GAAP profitability may cause non-compliance by the Company with
financial covenants of its credit facility, which, unless waived or amended,
could require the Company to make a principal repayment off the outstanding
balance, or that portion of the balance for which replacement financing is not
obtained. For example, during June 2003, the Company was not in compliance with
a financial ratio covenant of its credit facility, which was waived by the
lenders of the credit facility as part of the renewal agreement of the credit
facility entered into in August 2003. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - a.
Credit facility," above.
There can be no assurance that the Company's assumptions will turn out to be
correct. If the assumptions do not prove to be true (for example, if an asset in
the collateral base unexpectedly goes off-lease for an extended period of time)
and the Company has not obtained an applicable waiver or amendment of applicable
covenants from its lenders to deal with the situation, the Company may have to
sell a significant portion of its portfolio in order to maintain compliance with
covenants or face default on its credit facility.
Concentration of Lessees and Aircraft Type. The Company's three biggest
customers now comprise approximately 47% of the Company's current monthly lease
revenue. The lessees, doing business in Taiwan, Sweden and the US, constitute
approximately 20%, 17% and 10% of the Company's monthly lease revenue,
respectively. A lease default by or collection problems with one of these
customers could have a disproportionate negative impact on the Company's
financial results, and therefore, the Company's operating results will be
especially sensitive to any negative developments with respect to these
significant customers in terms of lease compliance or collection. Such
concentration of lessee credit risk will diminish in the future only if the
Company is able to lease additional assets to new lessees.
The acquisition of the four Fokker 50 aircraft also makes this aircraft type the
dominant aircraft in the portfolio, constituting 10 of the 25 aircraft in the
portfolio. As a result, a change in the desirability and availability of Fokker
50 aircraft, which would in turn affect valuations of such aircraft, would have
a disproportionately large impact on the Company's portfolio value. Such
aircraft type concentration will diminish if the Company acquires additional
assets of other types. Conversely, acquisition of additional Fokker 50 aircraft
will increase the Company's risks related to its concentration of aircraft type.
Remarketing of Repossessed Dash 7 Aircraft. In 2003, the Company repossessed two
deHavilland DHC-7 aircraft from a Haitian lessee, one of which was sold in July
2004. The remaining DHC-7 is a special purpose aircraft with short take-off and
landing abilities, which makes it attractive to specific niche operators.
Because it has four engines, however, it is relatively more expensive to operate
than two- engine 50-passenger turboprop aircraft and, therefore, unattractive to
operators who do not require the aircraft's special characteristics. Thus, it
has been the Company's experience that the remarketing period for DHC-7 aircraft
may be significantly longer than for other similar turboprop aircraft.
Consequently, a significant amount of time may pass before the DHC-7 aircraft
begins to generate cash flow and contribute to earnings for the Company either
through a re-lease or sale of the aircraft.
Increased Compliance Costs. Due to new Sarbanes-Oxley requirements applicable to
the Company by December 2005 relating to internal controls and auditors'
responsibilities to review and opine on those controls, the Company anticipates
that the fees and expenses in connection with audit services are likely to
significantly increase. The increase will generally arise from increased auditor
responsibilities as well as an increased scope of examination of the Company
which will broaden to include the Company's internal controls. Audit fees are
expected to increase by approximately 100% and there may be additional costs
arising from mandated testing of internal controls that will begin to take place
in 2005 and be performed on a continual basis thereafter. The Company does not
have an exact figure on the increased costs, as this amount can only be
determined as the Company proceeds further with its analysis of current internal
controls. The Company, however, anticipates that it will have sufficient funds
to pay for the increased compliance cost.
Risks of Debt Financing. The Company's use of acquisition financing under its
credit facility and its special purpose financings subject the Company to
increased risks of leveraging. If, due to a lessee default, the Company is
unable to repay the debt secured by the aircraft acquired, then the Company
could lose title to the acquired aircraft in a foreclosure proceeding. With
respect to the credit facility, the loans are secured by the Company's existing
assets as well as the assets acquired with each financing. In addition to
payment obligations, the credit facility also requires the Company to comply
with certain financial covenants, including a requirement of positive quarterly
earnings, interest coverage and net worth ratios. Any default under the credit
facility, if not waived by the lenders, could result in foreclosure upon not
only the asset acquired using such financing, but also the existing assets of
the Company securing the loan.
General Economic Conditions. The Company's business is dependent upon general
economic conditions and the strength of the travel and transportation industry.
The industry recently experienced a severe cyclical downturn which began in
mid-2001. This downturn was exacerbated by the terrorist attacks of September
11, 2001 and a reduction in airline passenger loads caused by Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome ("SARS"). As a result, there was an overall significant
reduction in air travel and less demand for aircraft capacity by the major air
carriers. There are signs that the industry is beginning to recover from the
downturn, but it is unclear whether this recovery will be a sustained one. The
recovery could be stalled or reversed by any number of events or circumstances,
including the global economy slipping back into recession, or specific events
related to the air travel industry, such as further weakening of the air carrier
or travel industries as a result of terrorist attacks, or an increase in the
price of jet fuel, operational or labor costs.
Since regional carriers are generally not as well-capitalized as major air
carriers, any economic setback in the industry may result in the increased
possibility of an economic failure of one or more of the Company's lessees,
particularly since many carriers are undertaking expansion of capacity to
accommodate the recovering air passenger traffic. If lessees experience
financial difficulties, this could, in turn, affect the Company's financial
performance.
During any periods of economic contraction, carriers generally reduce capacity,
in response to lower passenger loads, and as a result there is a reduced demand
for aircraft and a corresponding decrease in market lease rental rates and
aircraft values. This reduced market value for aircraft could affect the
Company's results if the market value of an asset or assets in the Company's
aircraft portfolio falls below book value, and the Company determines that a
write-down of the value on the Company's balance sheet is appropriate.
Furthermore, as older leases expire and are replaced by lease renewals or
re-leases at decreasing lease rates, the lease revenue of the Company on its
existing portfolio is likely to decline, with the magnitude of the decline
dependent on the length of the downturn and the depth of the decline in market
rents.
Economic downturns can affect specific regions of the world exclusively. As the
Company's portfolio is not entirely globally diversified, a localized downturn
in one of the key regions in which the Company leases aircraft (e.g., Europe or
Asia) could have a significant adverse impact on the Company.
Interest Rate Risk. All of the Company's current credit facility indebtedness
carries a floating interest rate based upon either the lender's prime rate or a
floating LIBOR rate. Lease rates, generally, but not always, move with interest
rates. Because lease rates are fixed at the origination of leases, interest rate
increases during the term of a lease have no effect on existing lease payments.
Therefore, if interest rates rise significantly, and there is relatively little
lease origination by the Company following such rate increases, the Company
could experience lower net earnings. The Company has not hedged its interest
rate obligations. Consequently, if an interest rate increase were great enough,
the Company might not be able to generate sufficient lease revenue to meet its
interest payment and other obligations and comply with the net earnings covenant
of its credit facility.
Leasing Risks. The Company's successful negotiation of lease extensions,
re-leases and sales may be critical to its ability to achieve its financial
objectives, and involves a number of risks. Demand for lease or purchase of the
assets depends on the economic condition of the airline industry which is, in
turn, sensitive to general economic conditions. The ability to remarket
equipment at acceptable rates may depend on the demand and market values at the
time of remarketing. The Company anticipates that the bulk of the equipment it
acquires will be used aircraft equipment. The market for used aircraft is
cyclical, and generally reflects economic conditions and the strength of the
travel and transportation industry. The demand for and value of many types of
used aircraft in the recent past has been depressed by such factors as airline
financial difficulties, increased fuel costs, the number of new aircraft on
order and the number of aircraft coming off-lease. The Company's expected
concentration in a limited number of airframe and aircraft engine types
(generally, turboprop equipment) subjects the Company to economic risks if those
airframe or engine types should decline in value. If "regional jets" were to be
used on short routes previously served by turboprops, even though regional jets
are more expensive to operate than turboprops, the demand for turboprops could
lessen. This could result in lower lease rates and values for the Company's
existing turboprop aircraft.
Lessee Credit Risk. If a customer defaults upon its lease obligations, the
Company may be limited in its ability to enforce remedies. Most of the Company's
lessees are small regional passenger airlines, which may be even more sensitive
to airline industry market conditions than the major airlines. As a result, the
Company's inability to collect rent under a lease or to repossess equipment in
the event of a default by a lessee could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's revenue. If a lessee that is a certified U.S. airline is in default
under the lease and seeks protection under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code, Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code would automatically prevent
the Company from exercising any remedies for a period of 60 days. After the
60-day period has passed, the lessee must agree to perform the obligations and
cure any defaults, or the Company will have the right to repossess the
equipment. This procedure under the Bankruptcy Code has been subject to
significant recent litigation, however, and it is possible that the Company's
enforcement rights may be further adversely affected by a declaration of
bankruptcy by a defaulting lessee.
Risks Related to Regional Air Carriers. Because the Company has concentrated its
existing leases and intends to concentrate on future leases to regional air
carriers, it is subject to certain risks. Some of the lessees in the regional
air carrier market are companies that are start-up, low capital, low margin
operations. Often, the success of such carriers is dependent upon arrangements
with major trunk carriers, which may be subject to termination or cancellation
by such major carrier. These types of lessees result in a generally higher lease
rate on aircraft, but may entail higher risk of default or lessee bankruptcy.
The Company evaluates the credit risk of each lessee carefully, and attempts to
obtain a third party guaranty, letters of credit or other credit enhancements,
if it deems them necessary. There is no assurance, however, that such
enhancements will be available or that if obtained they will fully protect the
Company from losses resulting from a lessee default or bankruptcy. Also, a
significant area of growth of this market is in areas outside of the United
States, where collection and enforcement are often more difficult and
complicated than in the United States.
Reliance on JMC. All management of the Company is performed by JMC under a
management agreement which is in the seventh year of a 20-year term and provides
for an asset-based management fee. JMC is not a fiduciary to the Company or its
stockholders. The Company's Board of Directors has ultimate control and
supervisory responsibility over all aspects of the Company and owes fiduciary
duties to the Company and its stockholders. While JMC may not owe any fiduciary
duties to the Company by virtue of the management agreement, the officers of JMC
are also officers of the Company, and in that capacity owe fiduciary duties to
the Company and the stockholders by virtue of holding such offices with the
Company. In addition, certain officers of the Company hold significant ownership
positions in JHC and the Company.
The JMC management agreement may be terminated if JMC defaults on its
obligations to the Company. However, the agreement provides for liquidated
damages in the event of its wrongful termination by the Company. All of the
officers of JMC are also officers of the Company, and certain directors of the
Company are also directors of JMC. Consequently, the directors and officers of
JMC may have a conflict of interest in the event of a dispute between the
Company and JMC. Although the Company has taken steps to prevent conflicts of
interest arising from such dual roles, such conflicts may still occur.
JMC has acted as management company for two other aircraft portfolio owners,
JetFleet III, which raised approximately $13,000,000 from investors, and
AeroCentury IV, Inc. ("AeroCentury IV"), which raised approximately $5,000,000
from investors.
In the first quarter of 2002, AeroCentury IV defaulted on certain obligations to
noteholders. In June 2002, the indenture trustee for AeroCentury IV's
noteholders repossessed AeroCentury IV's assets and took over management of
AeroCentury IV's remaining assets. JetFleet III defaulted on its Bond obligation
of $11,076,350 in May 2004. The indenture trustee for JetFleet III bondholders
repossessed JetFleet III's unsold assets in late May 2004.
Ownership Risks. Most of the Company's portfolio is leased under operating
leases, where the terms of the leases are less than the entire anticipated
useful life of an asset. The Company's ability to recover its purchase
investment in an asset subject to an operating lease is dependent upon the
Company's ability to profitably re-lease or sell the asset after the expiration
of the initial lease term. Some of the factors that have an impact on the
Company's ability to re-lease or sell include worldwide economic conditions,
general aircraft market conditions, regulatory changes that may make an asset's
use more expensive or preclude use unless the asset is modified, changes in the
supply or cost of aircraft equipment and technological developments which cause
the asset to become obsolete. In addition, a successful investment in an asset
subject to an operating lease depends in part upon having the asset returned by
the lessee in serviceable condition as required under the lease. If the Company
is unable to remarket its aircraft equipment on favorable terms when the
operating leases for such equipment expire, the Company's business, financial
condition, cash flow, ability to service debt and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
Furthermore, during the ownership of an asset, an asset impairment charge
against the Company's earnings may result from the occurrence of unexpected
adverse changes that impact the Company's estimates of expected cash flows
generated from such asset. The Company periodically reviews long-term assets for
impairments, in particular, when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is
recognized when the carrying amount of an asset is not recoverable and exceeds
its fair value. The Company may be required to recognize asset impairment
charges in the future as a result of the continued weak economic environment,
challenging market conditions in the airline industry or events related to
particular lessees, assets or asset types.
International Risks. The Company has focused on leases in overseas markets,
which the Company believes present opportunities. Leases with foreign lessees,
however, may present somewhat different credit risks than those with domestic
lessees.
Foreign laws, regulations and judicial procedures may be more or less protective
of lessor rights than those which apply in the United States. The Company could
experience collection or repossession problems related to the enforcement of its
lease agreements under foreign local laws and the remedies in foreign
jurisdictions. The protections potentially offered by Section 1110 of the
Bankruptcy Code do not apply to non-U.S. carriers, and applicable local law may
not offer similar protections. Certain countries do not have a central
registration or recording system with which to locally establish the Company's
interest in equipment and related leases. This could make it more difficult for
the Company to recover an aircraft in the event of a default by a foreign
lessee.
A lease with a foreign lessee is subject to risks related to the economy of the
country or region in which such lessee is located, which may be weaker than the
U.S. economy. On the other hand, a foreign economy may remain strong even though
the U.S. economy does not. A foreign economic downturn may impact a foreign
lessee's ability to make lease payments, even though the U.S. and other
economies remain stable. Furthermore, foreign lessees are subject to risks
related to currency conversion fluctuations. Although the Company's current
leases are all payable in U.S. dollars, the Company may agree in the future to
leases that permit payment in foreign currency, which would subject such lease
revenue to monetary risk due to currency fluctuations. Even with U.S.
dollar-denominated lease payment provisions, the Company could still be affected
by a devaluation of the lessee's local currency that would make it more
difficult for a lessee to meet its U.S. dollar-denominated lease payments,
increasing the risk of default of that lessee, particularly if its revenue is
primarily derived in the local currency.
Government Regulation. There are a number of areas in which government
regulation may result in costs to the Company. These include aircraft
registration, safety requirements, required equipment modifications, and
aircraft noise requirements. Although it is contemplated that the burden and
cost of complying with such requirements will fall primarily upon lessees of
equipment, there can be no assurance that the cost will not fall on the Company.
Furthermore, future government regulations could cause the value of any
non-complying equipment owned by the Company to decline substantially.
Competition. The aircraft leasing industry is highly competitive. The Company
competes with aircraft manufacturers, distributors, airlines and other
operators, equipment managers, leasing companies, equipment leasing programs,
financial institutions and other parties engaged in leasing, managing or
remarketing aircraft, many of which have significantly greater financial
resources and more experience than the Company. However, the Company believes
that it is competitive because of JMC's experience and operational efficiency in
identifying and obtaining financing for the transaction types desired by
regional air carriers. This market segment, which is characterized by
transaction sizes of less than $10 million and lessee credits that may be
strong, but are generally unrated, is not well served by the Company's larger
competitors in the aircraft industry. JMC has developed a reputation as a global
participant in this segment of the market, and the Company believes that JMC's
reputation will benefit the Company. There is, however, no assurance that the
lack of significant competition from the larger aircraft leasing companies will
continue or that the reputation of JMC will continue to be strong in this market
segment.
Casualties, Insurance Coverage. The Company, as owner of transportation
equipment, may be named in a suit claiming damages for injuries or damage to
property caused by its assets. As a triple net lessor, the Company is generally
protected against such claims, since the lessee would be responsible for, insure
against and indemnify the Company for, such claims. Further, some protection may
be provided by the United States Aviation Act with respect to the Company's
aircraft assets. It is, however, not clear to what extent such statutory
protection would be available to the Company, and the United States Aviation Act
may not apply to aircraft operated in foreign countries. Also, although the
Company's leases generally require a lessee to insure against likely risks,
there may be certain cases where the loss is not entirely covered by the lessee
or its insurance. Though this is a remote possibility, an uninsured loss with
respect to the equipment, or an insured loss for which insurance proceeds are
inadequate, would result in a possible loss of invested capital in and any
profits anticipated from, such equipment, as well as a potential claim directly
against the Company.
Possible Volatility of Stock Price. The market price of the Company's common
stock could be subject to fluctuations in response to the Company's operating
results, changes in general conditions in the economy, the financial markets,
the airline industry, changes in accounting principles or tax laws applicable to
the Company or its lessees, or other developments affecting the Company, its
customers or its competitors, some of which may be unrelated to the Company's
performance. Also, because the Company has a relatively small capitalization of
approximately 1.5 million shares, there is a correspondingly limited amount of
trading of the Company's shares. Consequently, a single or small number of
trades could result in a market fluctuation not related to any business or
financial development concerning the Company.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures
Quarterly evaluation of the Company's Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its "disclosure controls and
procedures" ("Disclosure Controls"), and its "internal controls over financial
reporting" ("Internal Controls"). This evaluation (the "Controls Evaluation")
was done under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial
Officer ("CFO"). Rules adopted by the SEC require that in this section of the
Report the Company present the conclusions of the CEO and the CFO about the
effectiveness of our Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls based on and as
of the date of the Controls Evaluation.
CEO and CFO Certifications. Attached as exhibits to this report are two separate
forms of "Certifications" of the CEO and the CFO. The first form of
Certification is required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (the "Section 302 Certification"). This section of the report which
you are currently reading is the information concerning the Controls Evaluation
referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be
read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls. Disclosure Controls are procedures
that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be
disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Exchange Act"), such as this report, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission's ("SEC") rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also
designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal
Controls are procedures which are designed with the objective of providing
reasonable assurance that (1) the Company's transactions are properly
authorized; (2) the Company's assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or
improper use; and (3) the Company's transactions are properly recorded and
reported, all to permit the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The Company's management,
including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that its Disclosure Controls or its
Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The CEO/CFO evaluation of the Company's
Disclosure Controls and the Company's Internal Controls included a review of the
controls objectives and design, the controls implementation by the company and
the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this report.
In the course of the Controls Evaluation, we sought to identify data errors,
controls problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective
action, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This type of
evaluation will be done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning
controls effectiveness can be reported in the Company's quarterly reports on
Form 10-QSB and annual report on Form 10-KSB. The Company's Internal Controls
are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by other personnel in the Company's
finance organization and by the Company's independent auditors in connection
with their audit and review activities. The overall goals of these various
evaluation activities are to monitor the Company's Disclosure Controls and the
Company's Internal Controls and to make modifications as necessary; the
Company's intent in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and the Internal
Controls will be maintained as dynamic systems that change (including with
improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant.
Among other matters, the Company sought in its evaluation to determine whether
there were any "significant deficiencies" or "material weaknesses" in the
Company's Internal Controls, or whether the Company had identified any acts of
fraud involving personnel who have a significant role in the Company's Internal
Controls. This information was important both for the Controls Evaluation
generally and because item 5 in the Section 302 Certifications of the CEO and
CFO require that the CEO and CFO disclose that information to the Audit
Committee of the Company's Board and to the Company's independent auditors and
to report on related matters in this section of the report. In the professional
auditing literature, "significant deficiencies" are referred to as "reportable
conditions"; these are control issues that could have a significant adverse
effect on the ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data in
the financial statements. A "material weakness" is defined in the auditing
literature as a particularly serious reportable condition where the internal
control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements
caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be material in relation
to the financial statements and not be detected within a timely period by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. The
Company also sought to deal with other controls matters in the Controls
Evaluation, and in each case if a problem was identified, the Company considered
what revision, improvement and/or correction to make in accordance with our
ongoing procedures.
In accordance with SEC requirements, the CEO and CFO note that, there has been
no significant change in Internal Controls that occurred during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect our Internal Controls.
Conclusions. Based upon the Controls Evaluation, the Company's CEO and CFO have
concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, the Company's Disclosure
Controls are effective to ensure that material information relating to the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including
the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when periodic reports are being
prepared, and that the Company's Internal Controls are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that the Company's consolidated financial statements are
fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
PART II
OTHER Information
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On April 29, 2004, the Company held its annual stockholder's meeting in San
Carlos, California. At that meeting, Neal D. Crispin and Evan M. Wallach were
re-elected to the Board of Directors.
The vote tally was as follows:
FOR ELECTION WITHHELD
Mr. Wallach 1,177,610 10,020
Mr. Crispin 1,177,113 10,517
The stockholders also confirmed the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
auditors of the Company.
The vote was as follows:
In Favor 1,174,195
Against 3,325
Abstain 10,110
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description
31.1 Certification of Neal D. Crispin, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Toni M. Perazzo, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1* Certification of Neal D. Crispin, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2* Certification of Toni M. Perazzo, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* These certificates are furnished to, but shall not be deemed to be filed with,
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
----------
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company furnished a Report on Form 8-K disclosing the first quarter earnings
release on April 28, 2004.
The Company filed a Report on Form 8-K disclosing the resignation of Maurice J.
Averay from, and the appointment of Thomas G. Hiniker to, the Company's Board of
Directors on June 30, 2004.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
AEROCENTURY CORP.
Date: August 11, 2004 By: /s/ Toni M. Perazzo
-------------------------------
Toni M. Perazzo
Title: Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer