e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-33155
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3444218 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
50 Old Webster Road, Oxford, Massachusetts
|
|
01540 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(508) 373-1100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
As of May 7, 2009, there were 45,369,925 shares of the registrants common stock issued and
outstanding.
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
share and per share date) |
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
71,601 |
|
|
$ |
51,283 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
29,740 |
|
|
|
41,842 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
66,445 |
|
|
|
72,555 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8,042 |
|
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
183,678 |
|
|
|
181,023 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, Net |
|
|
112,865 |
|
|
|
114,492 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
14,497 |
|
|
|
15,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
313,805 |
|
|
$ |
313,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line-of-credit facilities |
|
$ |
29,760 |
|
|
$ |
19,769 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
7,739 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
17,507 |
|
|
|
17,988 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2,364 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
56,330 |
|
|
|
49,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND OTHER LONG-TERM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
17,649 |
|
|
|
17,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 175,000,000 shares
authorized; 45,352,033 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2009; 44,965,960 shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
288,209 |
|
|
|
283,217 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(52,572 |
) |
|
|
(53,843 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IPG Photonics Corporation stockholders equity |
|
|
237,528 |
|
|
|
238,172 |
|
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
237,737 |
|
|
|
243,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
313,805 |
|
|
$ |
313,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
45,408 |
|
|
$ |
52,876 |
|
COST OF SALES |
|
|
29,547 |
|
|
|
28,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
15,861 |
|
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
4,142 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
13,836 |
|
|
|
11,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
12,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME, NET: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
12,492 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(3,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
8,495 |
|
LESS: NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
8,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
45,094 |
|
|
|
44,095 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
46,152 |
|
|
|
46,041 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,026 |
|
|
$ |
8,495 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,174 |
) |
|
|
(2,032 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
Unrealized losses (gains) on foreign currency transactions |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
Provisions for inventory, warranty and bad debt |
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
10,281 |
|
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
(7,298 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
|
|
618 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,156 |
) |
|
|
798 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
Income and other taxes payable |
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
17,510 |
|
|
|
5,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant, equipment and intangible assets |
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
(12,962 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
Other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,664 |
) |
|
|
(8,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line-of-credit facilities |
|
|
13,528 |
|
|
|
5,926 |
|
Payments on line-of-credit facilities |
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
(2,585 |
) |
Purchases of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term borrowings |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options and related tax benefit from exercise |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
9,568 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(2,096 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
20,318 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period |
|
|
51,283 |
|
|
|
37,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period |
|
$ |
71,601 |
|
|
$ |
38,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
2,795 |
|
|
$ |
2,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable |
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
1,556 |
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests in exchange for Common Stock |
|
$ |
2,191 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
COMMON STOCK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
44,965,960 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
44,012,341 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Common stock issued in purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
293,146 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
92,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
45,352,033 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44,206,335 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,506 |
|
Common stock issued in purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,497 |
) |
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82,348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,167 |
|
Translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,375 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL IPG PHONTONICS CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on purchase of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
220,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by IPG Photonics Corporation, or IPG, we, our, or the Company. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and those of our subsidiaries. All intercompany balances have been eliminated
in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an
amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 was retrospectively applied, and
|
|
|
clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the
consolidated financial statements, |
|
|
|
|
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest, |
|
|
|
|
establishes standards for accounting for changes in a parents ownership
interest in a subsidiary, and |
|
|
|
|
requires expanded disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between
interests of the parents owners and the interests of the noncontrolling owners
of a subsidiary. |
The calculation of earnings per share continues to be based on income amounts
attributable to the parent. SFAS No. 160 was effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2009. The changes in presentation prescribed by SFAS No. 160 are
incorporated in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements
of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Consolidated Statements of
Equity.
In the opinion of our management, the unaudited financial information for the
interim periods presented reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of
our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The results reported in
these consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of results that
may be expected for the entire year.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007)). SFAS
No. 141 (revised 2007) requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at
their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over
the net identifiable assets acquired. This standard also requires the fair value
measurement of certain other assets and liabilities related to the acquisition such as
contingencies and research and development. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) was required
to be applied prospectively beginning January 1, 2009 and has
not had a material
effect on our financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments
and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments
pursuant to paragraphs 37 and 42 of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133), and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS
133. SFAS 161 requires additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related
7
hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows. SFAS 161 was effective for the
Company beginning January 1, 2009. The disclosures prescribed by SFAS 161 are included
in Note 7 of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Components and raw materials |
|
$ |
25,073 |
|
|
$ |
27,482 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
26,719 |
|
|
|
28,653 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
14,653 |
|
|
|
16,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
66,445 |
|
|
$ |
72,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded inventory provisions totaling $2,743,000 and $733,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These provisions were recorded as a
result of changes in market prices of certain components, the realizable value of those
inventories through finished product sales and uncertainties related to the recoverability of
the value of inventories due to technological changes and excess quantities. These provisions
are reported as a reduction to components and raw materials and finished goods.
4. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
The Companys borrowings under existing financing arrangements consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revolving Line-of-Credit Facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Credit and Overdraft Facilities |
|
$ |
1,213 |
|
|
$ |
670 |
|
U.S. Line of Credit |
|
|
28,547 |
|
|
|
19,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,760 |
|
|
$ |
19,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Long-Term Note |
|
|
18,982 |
|
|
|
19,330 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
(1,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
17,649 |
|
|
$ |
17,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of diluted net income attributable to IPG
Photonics Corporation per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
8,149 |
|
Weighted average shares |
|
|
45,094 |
|
|
|
44,095 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares |
|
|
46,152 |
|
|
|
46,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The computation of diluted weighted average common shares excludes 1,399,000 and
66,000 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
because the effect on net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation per share
would have been anti-dilutive.
6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total comprehensive income and its components were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation |
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
8,149 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of tax |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(6,939 |
) |
|
|
6,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(5,637 |
) |
|
$ |
14,524 |
|
7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
On January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 161, which requires enhanced disclosures
regarding an entitys derivative and hedging activities as provided below.
Our primary market exposures are to interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We
use certain derivative financial instruments to help manage these exposures. We execute
these instruments with financial institutions we judge to be credit-worthy and the
majority are denominated in currencies of major industrial
countries. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes.
We recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities
at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet. We have used foreign currency forward
contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted intercompany settlements denominated in
foreign currencies. We have no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts. We have
an interest rate swap that is classified as a cash flow hedge of our variable rate debt.
Cash flow hedges - Our cash flow hedge is an interest rate swap under which we agree to
pay fixed rates of interest. We have no derivatives that are not accounted for as a hedging
instrument. The fair value amounts in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009 were
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
Other Assets
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other long-term liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The derivative gains and losses in the consolidated statement of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, related to our interest rate swap contract was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Loss Recognized in |
|
|
Pretax Loss on Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
Portion of Derivative |
|
|
Ineffective Portion of Gain on |
|
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
Derivative and Amount Excluded |
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
Effective Portion of |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
from Effectiveness Testing |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Recognized in Income |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Amount |
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
9
The notional amount of the outstanding interest rate swap was $18,982,000. We made no
adjustments to the fair value of this derivative as a result of evaluating counterparty risk.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No.
157) for our nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured on a non-recurring
basis. We adopted SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities in 2008. The adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our fair value measurements.
The following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and are categorized using
the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability
of the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to fair values determined based on
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 refers to fair values estimated
using significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 includes fair values estimated using
significant non-observable inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
9,027 |
|
|
$ |
9,027 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Treasury Bills |
|
|
30,664 |
|
|
|
30,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate Securities |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
41,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,691 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
$ |
(1,638 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,638 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
(1,638 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,638 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
|
$ |
22,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Treasury Bills |
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
9,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate Securities |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
32,959 |
|
|
$ |
31,650 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swap |
|
$ |
(1,667 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,667 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
(1,667 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,667 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
3,650 |
|
|
$ |
3,650 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
Other identifiable intangibles |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,661 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,702 |
|
|
$ |
5,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated future amortization expense for intangibles as of March 31, 2009 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
$1,047 |
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
10. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
The company typically provides one to three-year parts and service warranties on lasers
and amplifiers. Most of the sales offices provide support to customers in their respective
geographic areas. Warranty reserves have generally been sufficient to cover product warranty
repair and replacement costs. The following table summarizes product warranty activity
recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance January 1 |
|
$ |
3,224 |
|
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
Additions for current year deliveries |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Reductions for payments made |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(436 |
) |
Impact of
foreign currency rate changes |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance March 31 |
|
$ |
3,344 |
|
|
$ |
2,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In November 2006, the Company was sued for patent infringement relating to certain
products, including but not limited to fiber lasers and fiber amplifiers. The plaintiff has
made a complaint for damages of over $10 million, treble damages for alleged willful
infringement and injunctive relief. The case has been stayed until the termination of a
pending patent re-examination.
In February 2008, the Company was sued for patent infringement relating to two product
lines used in medical laser applications. The plaintiff has filed a complaint for unspecified
damages, treble damages for alleged willful infringement and
injunctive relief. The patent asserted in the lawsuit expired in April 2007. The case has
been stayed until October 2009 in connection with a patent reexamination.
The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to vigorously contest the
claims. No loss is deemed probable at March 31, 2009 and no amounts have been accrued in
respect of these contingencies.
11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This
discussion contains forward looking statements that are based on managements current
expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. Our actual results
may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking
statements. See Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We develop and manufacture a broad line of high-performance fiber lasers, fiber
amplifiers and diode lasers for diverse applications in numerous markets. Our diverse lines
of low, mid and high-power lasers and amplifiers are used in materials processing, advanced,
communications and medical applications. We sell our products globally to original equipment
manufacturers, or OEMs, system integrators and end users. We market our products
internationally primarily through our direct sales force and also through agreements with
independent sales representatives and distributors.
We are vertically integrated such that we design and manufacture all key components used
in our finished products, from semiconductor diodes to optical fiber preforms, finished fiber
lasers and amplifiers. Since our formation in 1990, we have been focused on developing and
manufacturing high-power fiber lasers and amplifiers.
Factors and Trends That Affect Our Operations and Financial Results
In reading our financial statements, you should be aware of the following factors and
trends that our management believes are important in understanding our financial performance.
Net sales. Our net sales have historically fluctuated from quarter to quarter. The
increase or decrease in sales from a prior quarter can be affected by the timing of orders
received from customers, the shipment, installation and acceptance of products at our
customers facilities, the mix of OEM orders and one-time orders for products with large
purchase prices, and seasonal factors such as the purchasing patterns and levels of activity
throughout the year in the regions where we operate. Historically, our net sales have been
higher in the second half of the year than in the first half of the year. Furthermore, net
sales can be affected by the time taken to qualify our products for use in new applications
in the end markets that we serve. The adoption of our products by a new customer or
qualification in a new application can lead to an increase in net sales for a period, which
may then slow until we further penetrate new markets or obtain new customers. Our net sales
can also be affected from quarter to quarter by the general level of worldwide economic
activity, including economic expansion or contraction, and expenditures on capital equipment.
In general, increases in worldwide economic activity have a positive effect on our sales and
decreases in economic activity have a negative effect our sales.
Gross margin. Our total gross margin in any period can be affected by total net sales
in any period, product mix, that is, the percentage of our revenue in that period that is
attributable to higher or lower-power products, production volumes, and by other factors,
some of which are not under our control. Our product mix affects our margins because the
selling price per watt is higher for low and mid-power devices than for high-power devices.
The overall cost of high-power lasers may be partially offset by improved absorption of fixed
overhead costs associated with sales of larger volumes of higher-power products.
Due to the fact that we have high fixed costs, our costs are difficult to adjust in
response to changes in demand. In addition, our fixed costs will increase as we expand our
capacity. Gross margins generally improve when greater absorption of fixed overhead costs is
associated with an increase in sales. In addition, absorption of fixed costs can benefit
gross margins due to an increase in production that is not sold and placed into inventory.
Gross margins generally decline if production volumes are lower as a result of a decrease in
sales or inventory because the absorption of fixed manufacturing costs will be reduced. If
both sales and inventory decrease in the same period the decline in gross margin may be
magnified if we cannot reduce fixed costs or chose not to reduce fixed costs to match the
decrease in the level of production. We also regularly review our inventory for items that
are slow-moving, have been rendered obsolete
or determined to be excess. If we experience a decline in sales that reduces absorption of
our fixed costs, or if we have production issues or inventory write-downs, our gross margins
will be negatively affected.
Sales and marketing expense. We expect to continue to expand our worldwide direct sales
organization, build and expand applications centers, hire additional personnel involved in
marketing in our existing and new geographic locations, increase the number of units used for
demonstration purposes and otherwise increase expenditures on sales and marketing activities
in order to support the growth in our net sales. As such, we expect that our sales and
marketing expenses will increase in the aggregate.
Research and development expense. We plan to continue to invest in research and
development to improve our existing components and products and develop new components and
products. We plan to increase the personnel involved in research and development and
12
expect
to increase other research and development expenses. As such, we expect that our research and
development expenses will increase in the aggregate.
General and administrative expense. We expect our general and administrative expenses
to increase moderately as we continue to invest in systems and resources to support our
worldwide operations. Legal expenses vary from quarter to quarter based upon the stage of
litigation, including patent re-examinations and termination of litigation stays but could
increase in response to any future litigation or due to a change in status of current
intellectual property matters. The timing and amount of legal expenses may vary
substantially from quarter to quarter.
Major customers. We have historically depended on a few customers for a large
percentage of our annual net sales. The composition of this group can change from year to
year. Net sales derived from our five largest customers as a percentage of our annual net
sales were 29% in 2006, 20% in 2007, 17% in 2008, and 15% for the three months ended March
31, 2009. We seek to add new customers and to expand our relationships with existing
customers. We anticipate that the composition of our net sales to our significant customers
will continue to change. If any of our significant customers were to substantially reduce
their purchases from us, our results would be adversely affected.
Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008
Overview. The worldwide economic downturn negatively affected our results of operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. With uncertain end market demand, we will
continue to focus on controlling costs and reducing inventories in order to maximize cash
flow. At the same time, we plan to continue to build on our technology by investing in new
sales and application personnel and R&D for new products. We anticipate that economic
conditions will continue to have a negative effect on our financial results in the second
quarter of 2009 as we experience continued weakness across many of our end markets,
especially in materials processing.
Net sales. Net sales decreased by $7.5 million, or 14.1%, to $45.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 from $52.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
This decrease was attributable to lower sales of fiber lasers in materials processing
applications, where net sales decreased by $9.4 million or 21.3% and communications
applications, where net sales decreased by $0.3 million or 9.0%, offset by increases in sales
of advanced applications, where net sales increased by $1.8 million, or 34.7%, and medical
applications, where net sales increased by $0.4 million, or 78.4%. The decrease in materials
processing applications resulted from decreased sales of pulsed lasers and low-power lasers
used in marking, engraving and printing applications. The decrease in pulsed laser sales was
partially off-set by an increase in sales of high power laser for materials processing. The
decrease in communications applications sales resulted primarily from decreased sales of
amplifiers and high power amplifiers. The increase in sales of advanced applications was due
to higher sales of high power lasers used in government and defense research. We estimate
that if exchange rates had been approximately the same as one year ago our first quarter 2009
sales would have been $2.1 million higher.
Cost of sales and gross margin. Cost of sales increased by $1.0 million, or 3.8%, to
$29.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $28.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008. Our gross margin decreased to 34.9% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from 46.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in gross
margin was the result of less favorable absorption of our fixed manufacturing costs due to a
decline in sales volume and reduction of inventory as well as an increase in charges related
to inventory write-downs. These increases were offset by a reduction in manufacturing
expenses in the period primarily related to reduced salaries and benefits expense and other
manufacturing supplies. Expenses related to inventory reserves and other valuation
adjustments increased by $2.0 million to $2.7 million or 6.0% of sales for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 as compared to 1.5% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
We estimate that if exchange rates had been approximately the same as one year ago our first
quarter 2009 gross profit would have been $0.5 million higher.
Sales and marketing expense. Sales and marketing expense increased by $0.1 million, or
1.3%, to $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $3.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, primarily as a result of an increase of $0.2 million
in contractor, advertising and travel expenses offset by a $0.1 million decrease in selling
expenses related to decreased depreciation of units used for demonstration purposes. As a
percentage of sales, sales and marketing expense increased to 7.0% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from 6.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. As we continue to expand
our worldwide sales organization, we expect expenditures on sales and marketing to continue
to increase in the aggregate although the near term increases will be more moderate. We
estimate that if exchange rates had been approximately the same as one year ago our first
quarter 2009 sales and marketing expense would have been $0.2 million higher.
Research and development expense. Research and development expense increased by $1.2
million, or 44.2%, to $4.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $2.9
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to an
increase of $0.6 million in material costs and $0.3 million in personnel costs. Research and
development activity continues to focus on
13
enhancing the performance of our internally
manufactured components, refining production processes to improve manufacturing yields and
the development of new products operating at different wavelengths and at higher output
powers and new complimentary accessories used with our products. As a percentage of sales,
research and development expense increased to 9.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2009
from 5.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2008. We estimate that if exchange rates had
been approximately the same as one year ago our first quarter 2009 research and development
expenses would have been $0.4 million higher.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expense decreased by $1.4
million, or 22.2%, to $5.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $6.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, primarily due to a decrease of $1.2
million in patent litigation defense fees and a $0.6 million decrease in personnel and
contractor expenses partially offset by $0.4 million increase in reserves for bad debts.
Expenses for patent litigation defense were higher for the three months ended March 31, 2008
due to activity in one patent litigation and a new patent litigation brought against the
Company. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expense decreased to 11.0% for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 12.1%. We estimate that if exchange rates had been
approximately the same as one year ago our first quarter 2009 general and administrative
expenses would have been $0.4 million higher.
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange. Loss (gain) on foreign exchange increased by $2.1
million to a loss of $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from a
gain of $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and was primarily attributable
to the depreciation of the Russian Ruble and Euro against the U.S. Dollar.
Interest expense. Interest expense, net was $0.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The change
in interest expense resulted from higher interest expense due to increased utilization of
credit lines.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes decreased by $3.5 million to $0.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $4.0 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, representing an effective tax rate of 31.0% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as compared to an effective tax rate of 32.0% for the three months ended March
31, 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to changes in distribution
of income among tax jurisdictions subject to differing tax rates.
Net income attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation . Net income attributable to IPG
Photonics Corporation decreased by $6.9 million to $1.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Net income
attributable to IPG Photonics Corporation as a percentage of our net sales decreased by 12.6
percentage points to 2.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 15.4% for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 due to the factors described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity as of March 31, 2009 consisted of cash and cash
equivalents of $71.6 million, unused credit lines and overdraft facilities of $29.2 million
and working capital (excluding cash) of $55.7 million. This compares to cash and cash
equivalents of $51.3 million, unused overdraft facilities of $40.9 million and working
capital (excluding cash) of $80.7 million as of December 31, 2008. The increase in cash and
cash equivalents of $20.3 million from December 31, 2008 relates primarily to cash provided
by operating activities during the first quarter of 2009 of $17.5 million and net proceeds
from our credit lines of $10.3 million, partially offset by capital expenditures and the
acquisition of noncontrolling interests totaling $5.1 million and the negative effect of
foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents of $2.1 million.
We held approximately $1.3 million in auction-rate securities (ARSs) at March 31, 2009
all of which is included in other long-term assets. Our investments in ARSs at March, 31,
2009 consisted solely of taxable municipal debt securities. None of the ARSs in our portfolio
are collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) or mortgage-backed securities.
As a result of continued auction failures, we continue to hold the ARSs not subject to
redemption and the issuers are required to pay interest on the ARSs at the maximum
contractual rate. As these auction failures have affected our ability to access these funds
in the near term, we have classified these as long-term available for sale securities.
Additionally, we have assessed the fair value of these instruments and have identified an
other-than-temporary decline in their market value related to the lack of liquidity. As a
result, we carry these ARSs at approximately 86% of their face value and recorded a charge
totaling $191,000 during 2008. These ARSs are insured and are rated A2 and AA by Moodys and
Standard & Poors, respectively. If the credit rating of the issuer of the ARSs were to
deteriorate, we may be required to further adjust the carrying value of these investments by
recording additional impairment charges. Based on our ability to access our cash, our
expected operating cash flows and our available credit lines, we do not expect that the
14
current lack of liquidity in our investments in ARSs will have a material impact on our
overall liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.
Our long-term debt consists of a $19.0 million secured variable-rate note described in
Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements which matures in August 2013. The note is
secured by a mortgage on real estate and buildings in Massachusetts. We expect that the
existing cash and marketable securities, our cash flows from operations and our existing
lines of credit will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital needs for the
foreseeable future. Our future long-term capital requirements will depend on many factors
including our rate of net sales growth, the timing and extent of spending to support
development efforts, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and
introductions of new products, the need to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity
and the continuing market acceptance of our products. We have made no arrangements to obtain
additional financing, and there is no assurance that such additional financing, if required
or desired, will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
The following table details our line-of-credit facilities as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Available Principal |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Security |
U.S. Revolving
Line of Credit
|
|
Up to $35 million
|
|
LIBOR plus 0.8% to
1.2%, depending on
the Companys
performance
|
|
July 2011
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Credit
Facility
(Germany) (1)
|
|
Euro 15.0 million
($19.8 million)
|
|
Euribor + 1.0% or
EONIA + 1.5%
|
|
June 2010
|
|
Unsecured,
guaranteed by
parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Overdraft
Facilities
|
|
Euro 3.2 million
($4.2 million)
|
|
3.90%-6.95%
|
|
Between July
2009 and March
2010
|
|
Common pool of
assets of German
and Italian
subsidiaries |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$4.0 million of this credit facility is available to our Russian subsidiary
and $1.3 million is available to our Italian subsidiary |
The Company is required to meet certain financial covenants associated with its U.S.
revolving line of credit and long term debt facilities. These covenants, tested quarterly,
include a debt service coverage ratio and a funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) ratio. The debt service coverage covenant requires
that we maintain a trailing twelve month ratio of cash flow to debt service that is greater
than 1.5:1. Debt service is defined as required principal and interest payments during the
period. Cash flow is defined as EBITDA less unfunded capital expenditures. For trailing
twelve month periods until June 2010, up to $15.0 million of our capital expenditures are
treated as being funded from the proceeds of our initial public offering. The funded debt to
EBITDA covenant requires that the sum of all indebtedness for borrowed money on a
consolidated basis shall be less than two times our trailing twelve months EBITDA. We were
in compliance with all such financial covenants as of March 31, 2009.
The financial covenants in our loan documents may cause us to not take or to delay
investments and actions that we might otherwise undertake because of limits on capital
expenditures and amounts that we can borrow or lease. In the event that we do not comply with
any one of these covenants, we would be in default under the loan agreement or loan
agreements, which may result in acceleration of the debt, cross-defaults on other debt or a
reduction in available liquidity, any of which could harm our results of operations and
financial condition.
Operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 increased by $12.1 million to $17.5 million from $5.4 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in
the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008 primarily resulted from:
|
|
|
A decrease in accounts receivable of $10.3 million compared to an increase of
$2.2 million; |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in inventory of $0.9 million compared to an increase of inventory of
$7.3 million; partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in cash provided by net income after adding back non-cash charges of
$4.9 million.
|
15
Given our vertical integration, rigorous and time-consuming testing procedures for both
internally manufactured and externally purchased components and the lead time required to
manufacture components used in our finished product, the rate at which we turn inventory has
historically been low when compared to our cost of sales. We do not expect this to change
significantly in the future and believe that we will have to maintain a relatively high level
of inventory compared to our cost of sales. As a result, we continue to expect to have a
significant amount of working capital invested in inventory and for changes in our level of
inventory to lead to an increase in cash generated from our operations when it is sold or a
decrease in cash generated from our operations at times when the amount of inventory is
increasing. A reduction in our level of net sales or the rate of growth of our net sales from
their current levels would mean that the rate at which we are able to convert our inventory
into accounts receivable would decrease.
Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $4.7 million and $8.5
million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The cash used in
investing activities in the first quarter of 2009 was related to $4.7 million of capital
expenditures on property, plant and equipment. The cash used in investing activities in the
first quarter of 2008 was primarily related to capital expenditures on property, plant and
equipment of $13.0 million. In 2009 and 2008, capital expenditures in the United States,
Germany, and Russia related to facilities and equipment for diode wafer growth, burn-in test
stations and packaging as well as new fiber assembly and component production facilities. We
expect capital expenditures, excluding intangible assets, in the range of $13 million to $15
million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The timing and extent of any capital
expenditures in and between periods can have a significant effect on our cash flow. Many of
the capital expenditure projects that we undertake have long lead times and are difficult to
cancel or defer, with the result that it would be difficult to defer such committed capital
expenditures to a later period.
Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $9.6 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared $3.7 million in the three months ended March
31, 2008. The cash provided by financing activities in 2009 was primarily related to the net
proceeds of $10.2 million from the use of our credit lines, partially offset by cash used to
purchase noncontrolling interests of $0.4 million. The cash provided by financing activities
in 2008 was primarily related to the net proceeds of $3.3 million from the use of our credit
lines. The increase in net drawings on credit lines in 2009 was primarily related to a plan
to increase cash liquidity in response to economic uncertainties present during the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and we intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the
safe harbors created thereby. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q except for historical information are forward-looking statements. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as may, will, expect, believe,
anticipate, intend, could, estimate, or continue or the negative or other
variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial
performance, trends in our businesses, or other characterizations of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations of our
management based on available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties,
all of which are difficult or impossible to accurately predict and many of which are beyond
our control. As such, our actual results may differ significantly from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to such differences include,
but are not limited to, those discussed in more detail in Item 1, Business and Item 1A,
Risk Factors of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008. Readers should carefully review these risks, as well as the additional risks described
in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In light of the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that such results will be achieved,
and readers are cautioned not to rely on such forward-looking information. We undertake no
obligation to revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or
circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007)), and SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160).
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) requires an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at their
fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net
identifiable assets acquired. This standard also requires the fair value measurement of
certain other assets and liabilities related to the
16
acquisition such as contingencies and
research and development. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) was required to be applied
prospectively beginning January 1, 2009 and did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
SFAS No. 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be reported as a
component of stockholders equity in the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated net
income should include the net income for both the parent and the noncontrolling interest with
disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of income. The calculation of
earnings per share will continue to be based on income amounts attributable to the parent.
SFAS No. 160 was effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The changes in
presentation prescribed by SFAS No. 160 have been incorporated in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows and Consolidated Statements of Equity.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments and
non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments pursuant to
paragraphs 37 and 42 of SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, (SFAS 133), and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS 133. SFAS 161
requires additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments,
(b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and
its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect an entitys financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009. The disclosures prescribed by SFAS 161
have been included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of business, which consists
primarily of interest rate risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents and our debt
and foreign exchange rate risk.
Interest rate risk. Our investments have limited exposure to market risk. To minimize
this risk, we maintain a portfolio of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments,
consisting primarily of bank deposits, money market funds and short-term government funds.
The interest rates are variable and fluctuate with current market conditions. Because of the
short-term nature of these instruments, a sudden change in market interest rates would not be
expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our exposure to market risk also relates to the increase or decrease in the amount of
interest expense we must pay on our bank debt and borrowings on our bank credit facilities.
The interest rate on our existing bank debt is currently fixed except for our U.S. revolving
line of credit and our Euro credit facility. The rates on our Euro overdraft facilities in
Germany and Italy and our Japanese Yen overdraft facility are fixed for twelve-month periods.
Approximately 39% of our outstanding debt had a fixed rate of interest as of March 31, 2009.
We do not believe that a 10% change in market interest rates would have a material impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
Exchange rates. Due to our international operations, a significant portion of our net
sales, cost of sales and operating expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar, principally the Euro, the Japanese Yen and the Russian Ruble. As a result, our
international operations give rise to transactional market risk associated with exchange rate
movements of the U.S. dollar, the Euro, the Japanese Yen and the Russian Ruble. Gains and
losses on foreign exchange transactions totaled a $1.5 million loss, and a $0.6 million gain
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Management believes that
the use of foreign currency financial
instruments reduces the risks of certain foreign currency transactions, however, these
instruments provide only limited protection. We will continue to analyze our exposure to
currency exchange rate fluctuations and may engage in additional financial hedging techniques
in the future to attempt to minimize the effect of these potential fluctuations. Exchange
rate fluctuations may adversely affect our financial results in the future. No foreign
currency derivative instruments were outstanding at March 31, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision of our chief executive officer and our chief financial
officer, our management has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)),
as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Evaluation Date). Based upon that evaluation, our chief
17
executive officer and our
chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) that occurred during
the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are party to various legal proceedings and other disputes
incidental to our business. There have been no material developments in the first
quarter of 2009 with respect to those proceedings previously reported in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q are not the only risks facing our
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we have sold and issued 293,146
unregistered shares of common stock as payment of the purchase price for the 31.6% minority
interest in NTO IRE-Polus that we did not previously own. NTO- IRE-Polus is now 99.9% owned
by us. The aggregate purchase price was $6,117,973. The sales of securities
described above 3 above were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions by an issuer
not involving a public offering. Each of these sales was to accredited investors, as such
term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D. Each of the recipients of securities in the
transactions deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act received written disclosures that the securities had not been registered under the
Securities Act and that any resale must be made pursuant to a registration or an available
exemption from such registration. None of the sales of the securities described above
involved the use of an underwriter, and no commissions were paid in connection with the sale
of any of the securities that we issued. The sales of these securities were made without
general solicitation or advertising.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
18
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 |
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPG PHOTONICS CORPORATION
|
|
Date: May 11, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Valentin P. Gapontsev
|
|
|
|
Valentin P. Gapontsev |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 11, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Timothy P.V. Mammen
|
|
|
|
Timothy P.V. Mammen |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
20