e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
x
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 27, 2008
|
|
OR
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission file number 0-15867
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS,
INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0148231
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
2655 Seely Avenue, Building 5, San Jose, California
|
|
95134
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(408) 943-1234
Registrants
Telephone Number, including Area Code
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer, and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer [ X ]
|
Accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Smaller
reporting company [ ]
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes No X
On November 29, 2008, 256,278,936 shares of the
registrants common stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding.
EXPLANATORY
NOTE
On December 11, 2008, Cadence Design Systems, Inc., or
Cadence, restated its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements as of and for the three months ended March 29,
2008 and as of and for the three and six months ended
June 28, 2008. The restatement corrected revenue
recognition with respect to an arrangement in which
$24.8 million of Product revenue was recognized in the
first quarter of 2008 and $1.0 million of Maintenance
revenue was recognized in the second quarter of 2008, but should
be recognized during the term of the arrangement, beginning in
the fourth quarter of 2008. The restatement also corrected
revenue recognition with respect to an arrangement in which
$12.0 million of Product revenue was recognized in the
second quarter of 2008, but should be recognized during the term
of the arrangement, beginning in the third quarter of 2008. In
addition, Cadence made two other Product revenue adjustments
that were previously disclosed in Cadences Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 28, 2008, initially filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on July 29,
2008, and one other previously determined immaterial adjustment.
See Note 2 of Cadences Amendment No. 1 to
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarters ended March 29, 2008 and June 28,
2008. In addition to this
Form 10-Q,
Cadence is concurrently filing Amendment No. 1 to
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarters ended March 29, 2008 and June 28,
2008.
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
INDEX
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
551,753
|
|
|
$
|
1,062,920
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
6,068
|
|
|
|
15,193
|
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $3,355 and $2,895, respectively
|
|
|
278,458
|
|
|
|
326,211
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
25,545
|
|
|
|
31,003
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
84,112
|
|
|
|
94,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
945,936
|
|
|
|
1,529,563
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $636,305 and $624,680, respectively
|
|
|
359,196
|
|
|
|
339,463
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,315,217
|
|
|
|
1,310,211
|
|
Acquired intangibles, net
|
|
|
101,409
|
|
|
|
127,072
|
|
Installment contract receivables
|
|
|
170,503
|
|
|
|
238,010
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
356,527
|
|
|
|
326,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
3,248,788
|
|
|
$
|
3,871,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
230,385
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
259,062
|
|
|
|
289,934
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
245,901
|
|
|
|
265,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
504,963
|
|
|
|
785,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
124,703
|
|
|
|
136,655
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
500,178
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
413,993
|
|
|
|
368,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,038,874
|
|
|
|
1,005,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
1,546,278
|
|
|
|
1,516,493
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(730,301
|
)
|
|
|
(619,125
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
868,255
|
|
|
|
1,162,441
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
20,719
|
|
|
|
20,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,704,951
|
|
|
|
2,080,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
3,248,788
|
|
|
$
|
3,871,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
107,572
|
|
|
$
|
273,799
|
|
|
$
|
422,365
|
|
|
$
|
775,496
|
|
Services
|
|
|
32,873
|
|
|
|
31,225
|
|
|
|
98,763
|
|
|
|
95,963
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
92,043
|
|
|
|
95,900
|
|
|
|
290,151
|
|
|
|
285,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
232,488
|
|
|
|
400,924
|
|
|
|
811,279
|
|
|
|
1,157,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
|
11,829
|
|
|
|
13,823
|
|
|
|
39,241
|
|
|
|
42,302
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
25,677
|
|
|
|
23,364
|
|
|
|
78,083
|
|
|
|
70,421
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
|
13,910
|
|
|
|
15,217
|
|
|
|
42,889
|
|
|
|
45,635
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
91,075
|
|
|
|
97,163
|
|
|
|
274,016
|
|
|
|
297,924
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
112,486
|
|
|
|
125,391
|
|
|
|
357,929
|
|
|
|
365,418
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32,937
|
|
|
|
40,747
|
|
|
|
105,608
|
|
|
|
123,166
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
5,626
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
|
|
17,206
|
|
|
|
13,661
|
|
Restructuring and other charges (credits)
|
|
|
48,120
|
|
|
|
(7,066
|
)
|
|
|
47,765
|
|
|
|
(9,584
|
)
|
Write-off of acquired in-process technology
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
341,660
|
|
|
|
316,056
|
|
|
|
963,337
|
|
|
|
951,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(109,172
|
)
|
|
|
84,868
|
|
|
|
(152,058
|
)
|
|
|
205,449
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,180
|
)
|
|
|
(2,849
|
)
|
|
|
(9,055
|
)
|
|
|
(9,373
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(7,714
|
)
|
|
|
14,201
|
|
|
|
(3,701
|
)
|
|
|
47,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(120,066
|
)
|
|
|
96,220
|
|
|
|
(164,814
|
)
|
|
|
244,014
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
49,000
|
|
|
|
23,488
|
|
|
|
50,269
|
|
|
|
67,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(169,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,732
|
|
|
$
|
(215,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
176,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
252,915
|
|
|
|
272,977
|
|
|
|
256,119
|
|
|
|
272,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
252,915
|
|
|
|
299,506
|
|
|
|
256,119
|
|
|
|
297,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
1,062,920
|
|
|
$
|
934,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(215,083
|
)
|
|
|
176,749
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
97,719
|
|
|
|
96,798
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
57,678
|
|
|
|
78,828
|
|
Equity in loss from investments, net
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
(Gain) loss on investments, net
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
(16,608
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on sale and leaseback of land and buildings
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
(12,606
|
)
|
Write-down of investment securities
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
Write-off of acquired in-process technology
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
Non-cash restructuring and other charges (credits)
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
(7,106
|
)
|
Tax benefit of call options
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
7,036
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(11,020
|
)
|
|
|
4,848
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of receivables, net
|
|
|
48,124
|
|
|
|
163,549
|
|
Provisions (recoveries) for losses (gains) on trade accounts
receivable and sales returns
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
acquired businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
21,489
|
|
|
|
9,053
|
|
Installment contract receivables
|
|
|
46,198
|
|
|
|
(273,301
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
5,486
|
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
(3,421
|
)
|
|
|
(23,229
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(41,582
|
)
|
|
|
(35,516
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(32,243
|
)
|
|
|
9,411
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
35,972
|
|
|
|
18,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
37,728
|
|
|
|
208,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
53,783
|
|
|
|
6,468
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
(62,447
|
)
|
|
|
----
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of long-term investments
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
6,323
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
46,500
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(81,112
|
)
|
|
|
(57,405
|
)
|
Purchases of software licenses
|
|
|
(1,199
|
)
|
|
|
----
|
|
Investment in venture capital partnerships and equity investments
|
|
|
(4,053
|
)
|
|
|
(3,214
|
)
|
Cash paid in business combinations and asset acquisitions, net
of cash acquired, and acquisition of intangibles
|
|
|
(20,621
|
)
|
|
|
(74,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(112,399
|
)
|
|
|
(75,445
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on term loan
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
(28,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from receivable sale financing
|
|
|
17,970
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Payment of convertible notes due 2023
|
|
|
(230,207
|
)
|
|
|
----
|
|
Tax benefit from employee stock transactions
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
20,727
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
48,116
|
|
|
|
249,006
|
|
Stock received for payment of employee taxes on vesting of
restricted stock
|
|
|
(3,693
|
)
|
|
|
(11,735
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(273,950
|
)
|
|
|
(372,416
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(441,337
|
)
|
|
|
(133,860
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(511,167
|
)
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
|
|
$
|
551,753
|
|
|
$
|
935,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
CADENCE
DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1.
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
have been prepared by Cadence Design Systems, Inc., or Cadence,
without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, Cadence
believes that the disclosures contained in this Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, for a Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
are meant to be, and should be, read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included
in Cadences Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007. Cadences
fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to December 31.
Fiscal 2007 was a 52-week year and fiscal 2008 will be a 53-week
year ending on January 3, 2009.
The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
reflect all adjustments (which include only normal, recurring
adjustments and those items discussed in these Notes) that are,
in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the
results for the periods presented. The results for such periods
are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for
the full fiscal year.
Preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, or
SFAS, No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which
defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance
found in various prior accounting pronouncements.
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued
FASB Staff Position, or FSP,
FAS No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods
within those fiscal years for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis (at least annually). Cadence adopted
SFAS No. 157 for fiscal 2008, except as it applies to
those non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities as
described in FSP
FAS No. 157-2,
and it did not have a material impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. See
Note 3 for information and related disclosures regarding
Cadences fair value measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. Under SFAS No. 159, companies may
elect to measure certain financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. The standard requires that unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected be reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. Cadence adopted SFAS No. 159 for fiscal 2008.
However Cadence did not elect to apply the fair value option to
any financial instruments or other items upon adoption of
SFAS No. 159 or during the nine months ended
September 27, 2008. Therefore, the adoption of
SFAS No. 159 did not impact Cadences
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
4
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Cadence has equity incentive plans that provide for the grant to
employees of stock-based awards, including stock options,
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. Restricted
stock awards and restricted stock units are referred to as
restricted stock in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
In addition, the 1995 Directors Stock Option Plan, or
1995 Directors Plan, provides for the automatic grant of
stock options to non-employee members of Cadences Board of
Directors. Cadence also has an employee stock purchase plan, or
ESPP, which enables employees to purchase shares of Cadence
common stock.
Stock-based compensation expense and the related income tax
benefit recognized under SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations in connection with stock options,
restricted stock and the ESPP for the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
5,809
|
|
|
$
|
9,069
|
|
|
$
|
20,036
|
|
|
$
|
29,166
|
|
Restricted stock and stock bonuses
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
12,022
|
|
|
|
27,007
|
|
|
|
41,531
|
|
ESPP
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
|
10,635
|
|
|
|
8,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
14,634
|
|
|
$
|
24,119
|
|
|
$
|
57,678
|
|
|
$
|
78,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
$
|
7,312
|
|
|
$
|
15,036
|
|
|
$
|
26,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Options
The exercise price of each stock option granted under
Cadences employee equity incentive plans is equal to or
greater than the market price of Cadences common stock on
the date of grant. Generally, option grants vest over four
years, expire no later than ten years from the grant date and
are subject to the employees continuing service to
Cadence. The options granted under the 1995 Directors Plan
vest one year from the date of grant. Options assumed in
connection with acquisitions generally have exercise prices that
differ from the fair value of Cadences common stock on the
date of acquisition and such options generally continue to vest
under their original vesting schedules and expire on the
original dates stated in the acquired companys option
agreements. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
and the weighted average assumptions used in the model for the
three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
|
42.9%
|
|
|
|
23.2%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4.26%
|
|
|
|
2.76%
|
|
|
|
4.68%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
6.41
|
|
|
$
|
4.22
|
|
|
$
|
5.14
|
|
Cadence did not grant any stock options during the three months
ended September 27, 2008. The computation of the expected
volatility assumption used in the Black-Scholes pricing model
for new grants is based on implied volatility. When establishing
the expected life assumption, Cadence reviews annual historical
employee exercise behavior with respect to option grants having
similar vesting periods. The risk-free interest rate for the
period within the expected term of the option is based on the
yield of United States Treasury notes in effect at the time of
grant. Cadence has not historically paid dividends; thus the
expected dividend yield used in the calculation is zero.
5
Restricted
Stock and Stock Bonuses
The cost of restricted stock is determined using the fair value
of Cadences common stock on the date of the grant, and
compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period. The
weighted average grant date fair values of restricted stock
granted during the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted
|
|
$
|
8.02
|
|
|
$
|
20.65
|
|
|
$
|
11.02
|
|
|
$
|
20.59
|
|
Generally, restricted stock vests over four years and is subject
to the employees continuing service to Cadence. Cadence
issues some of its restricted stock with performance-based
vesting. The terms of these restricted stock grants are
consistent with grants of restricted stock described above, with
the exception that the shares vest not upon the mere passage of
time, but upon the attainment of certain predetermined
performance goals. Cadence estimates the most likely outcome of
such performance goals and recognizes the related stock-based
compensation expense at each period. The amount of stock-based
compensation expense recognized in any one period can vary based
on the attainment or estimated attainment of the various
performance goals. If such performance goals are not met, no
compensation expense is recognized and any previously recognized
compensation expense is reversed.
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence
modified the performance goals related to its performance-based
restricted stock awards. On the modification date, Cadence
evaluated the likelihood of achievement of both the original
performance goals and the modified performance goals. For the
performance-based restricted stock awards in which the original
performance goal was unlikely to be achieved, Cadence reversed
the previously recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$6.5 million, calculated the fair value of the restricted
stock award on the modification date, and will record the
stock-based compensation expense to the extent that the modified
performance goals are expected to be achieved over the remaining
weighted average requisite service period of 1.0 years. The
fair value of the modified performance-based restricted stock
awards was $6.2 million, or $7.34 per share. For the
performance-based restricted stock awards in which both the
original performance goal and the modified performance goal were
determined to be likely to be achieved, the original grant date
fair value will continue to be recorded as stock-based
compensation expense as if no modification had occurred.
As noted in Note 16 below, certain executive officers
resigned from their positions at Cadence in October 2008.
Pursuant to the resignations and the terms of the respective
employment agreements of these executive officers, the
performance-based restricted shares have either been forfeited
or will vest subject to the terms of those agreements. Cadence
will record additional stock-based compensation expense during
the three months ending January 3, 2009 relating to the
accelerated vesting, which will be offset by the reversal of
previously recorded stock-based compensation expense relating to
the performance-based awards that were forfeited.
Stock-based compensation expense (credits) related to the
performance-based restricted stock grants for the three and nine
months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense (credits) related to
performance-based grants
|
|
$
|
(5,402
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,868
|
|
|
$
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
Liability-based
Awards
Cadence maintains a performance-based bonus plan under which
payments may be made in Cadences common stock. Each
period, Cadence estimates the most likely outcome of
predetermined performance goals and recognizes any related
stock-based compensation expense. The amount of stock-based
compensation expense
6
recognized in any one period can vary based on the attainment or
estimated attainment of the various performance goals. If such
performance goals are not met, no compensation expense is
recognized and any previously recognized compensation expense is
reversed. The dollar amount earned under this bonus plan is
based on the achievement of the performance goals, and the
number of shares to be issued under the plan is based on the
average stock price for three days preceding the grant date.
Stock issued under the performance-based bonus plan vests
immediately. During the three months ended September 27,
2008, Cadence agreed to make the periods payment of
$2.9 million in cash. During the nine months ended
September 27, 2008, Cadence agreed to make both of the
periods payments totaling $5.6 million in cash. Under
the terms of this performance-based bonus plan, future payments
may be made in cash or stock. Stock-based compensation expense
related to these performance-based bonus plans and the shares
issued for the three and nine months ended September 27,
2008 and September 29, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to performance-based
bonus plan
|
|
$
|
1,742
|
|
|
$
|
1,423
|
|
|
$
|
4,569
|
|
|
$
|
8,212
|
|
Shares issued for performance-based bonus plan
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase
Cadences common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower
of the fair market value at the beginning of the applicable
offering period or at the end of each applicable purchase
period, in an amount up to 12% of their annual base earnings
plus bonuses, subject to a limit in any calendar year of $25,000
worth of common stock. The duration of each offering period
under the ESPP is six months. New offerings begin on each
February
1st and
August
1st of
each year and the purchase dates under the ESPP are January
31st and
July 31st
of each year.
Shares of Cadences common stock issued under the ESPP for
the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Cadence shares issued under the ESPP
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
6,076
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
Cash received from the exercise of purchase rights under the ESPP
|
|
|
21,093
|
|
|
$
|
21,383
|
|
|
|
44,547
|
|
|
$
|
43,964
|
|
Weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
|
$
|
16.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.33
|
|
|
$
|
13.74
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense is calculated using the fair
value of the employees purchase rights under the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average grant
date fair value of purchase rights granted under the ESPP and
the weighted average assumptions used in the model for the three
and nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
September 29, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50.3%
|
|
|
|
27.0%
|
|
|
|
48.0%
|
|
|
|
24.6%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.88%
|
|
|
|
4.96%
|
|
|
|
1.95%
|
|
|
|
5.08%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
$
|
5.01
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
4.74
|
|
7
The computation of the expected volatility assumption used in
the Black-Scholes pricing model for purchase rights is based on
implied volatility. The expected life assumption is based on the
average exercise date for the purchase periods in each offering
period. The risk-free interest rate for the period within the
expected life of the purchase right is based on the yield of
United States Treasury notes in effect at the time of grant.
Cadence has not historically paid dividends; thus the expected
dividend yield used in the calculation is zero.
|
|
NOTE 3.
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
On a quarterly basis, Cadence measures at fair value certain
financial assets and liabilities, including cash equivalents,
available-for-sale
securities, time deposits, trading securities held in
Cadences Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans, or
NQDCs, and foreign exchange contracts. SFAS No. 157
specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether
the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or
unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained
from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect
Cadences market assumptions. These two types of inputs
have created the following fair-value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices for identical
instruments in active markets;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar
instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or
similar instruments in markets that are not active, and
model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and
significant value drivers are observable in active
markets; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Valuations derived from
valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or
significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
This hierarchy requires Cadence to minimize the use of
unobservable inputs and to use observable market data, if
available, when determining fair value. The fair value of these
financial assets and liabilities was determined using the
following levels of inputs as of September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents Money market mutual funds
|
|
$
|
425,395
|
|
|
$
|
425,395
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Trading securities held in NQDCs
|
|
|
47,862
|
|
|
|
47,862
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
479,325
|
|
|
$
|
479,261
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
Securities
Available-for-sale
securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains
and losses presented net of tax and reported as a separate
component of Stockholders equity. Realized gains and
losses are determined using the specific identification method.
Gains are recognized when realized and are recorded in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as Other income
(expense), net. Losses are recognized as realized or when
Cadence has determined that an
other-than-temporary
decline in fair value has occurred.
8
It is Cadences policy to review the fair value of
available-for-sale
securities on a regular basis to determine whether its
investments in these companies are
other-than-temporarily
impaired. This evaluation includes, but is not limited to,
reviewing each companys cash position, financing needs,
earnings or revenue outlook, operational performance, management
or ownership changes and competition. If Cadence believes the
carrying value of an investment is in excess of its fair value,
and this difference is
other-than-temporary,
it is Cadences policy to write down the investment to
reduce its carrying value to fair value.
The following table summarizes Cadences
available-for-sale
securities as of September 27, 2008 and December 29,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
September 27, 2008
|
|
$
|
4,024
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
(942
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,082
|
|
December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
14,044
|
|
|
$
|
4,467
|
|
|
$
|
(3,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,939
|
|
The following table summarizes the fair value and gross
unrealized losses related to
available-for-sale
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position as of September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
1,395
|
|
|
$
|
(942
|
)
|
Cadence determined that one of its
available-for-sale
securities was
other-than-temporarily
impaired based on the severity and the duration of the
impairment and Cadence wrote down the investment by
$2.4 million during the three months ended
September 27, 2008 and $7.8 million during the nine
months ended September 27, 2008. This impairment is
included in Other income (expense), net in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations. Cadence did not recognize
an
other-than-temporary
impairment of
available-for-sale
securities during the three or nine months ended
September 29, 2007.
Net recognized gains (losses) from the sale of
available-for-sale
securities for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
(9,379
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,093
|
|
|
$
|
(7,945
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,404
|
|
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence
purchased approximately 4.3 million shares of Mentor
Graphics Corporation, or Mentor Graphics, common stock in
connection with its proposed acquisition of Mentor Graphics.
Subsequent to the announcement of Cadences withdrawal of
the proposed acquisition of Mentor Graphics and during the three
months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence sold its entire
equity interest in Mentor Graphics at a loss of
$9.4 million.
Cost
Method Investments
Investments accounted for by Cadence under the cost method of
accounting are carried at historical cost and Cadence
periodically evaluates the fair value of each investment to
determine if an
other-than-temporary
decline in value has occurred. Cadence did not record
write-downs due to
other-than-temporary
declines in value of non-marketable securities for the three
months ended September 27, 2008, but did record
$2.0 million for the three months ended September 29,
2007. Cadence recorded write-downs due to
other-than-temporary
declines in value of
9
non-marketable securities carried on the cost basis of
$2.9 million for the nine months ended September 27,
2008 and $2.6 million for the nine months ended
September 29, 2007. These write-downs are included in Other
income (expense), net, in the Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Operations.
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
CONVERTIBLE
NOTES
|
1.375% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2011 and 1.500% Convertible Senior Notes
Due 2013
In December 2006, Cadence issued $250.0 million principal
amount of 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011, or the
2011 Notes, and $250.0 million of 1.500% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2013, or the 2013 Notes, and collectively, the
Convertible Senior Notes, to three initial purchasers in a
private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for
resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to SEC
Rule 144A of the Securities Act, or SEC Rule 144A.
Cadence received net proceeds of approximately
$487.0 million after transaction fees of approximately
$13.0 million, including $12.0 million of underwriting
discounts. A portion of the net proceeds totaling
$228.5 million was used to purchase $189.6 million
principal amount of Cadences Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior
Convertible Notes Due 2023, or the 2023 Notes.
Holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes prior to
maturity upon the occurrence of one of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of Cadences common stock reaches $27.50 during
certain periods of time specified in the Convertible Senior
Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes falls below a
certain threshold.
|
On and after November 2, 2011, in the case of the 2011
Notes, and November 1, 2013, in the case of the 2013 Notes,
until the close of business on the scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert
their Convertible Senior Notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. Cadence may not redeem the Convertible
Senior Notes prior to maturity.
The initial conversion rate for the Convertible Senior Notes is
47.2813 shares of Cadence common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of Convertible Senior Notes, equivalent to a conversion
price of approximately $21.15 per share of Cadence common stock.
Upon conversion, a holder will receive the sum of the daily
settlement amounts, calculated on a proportionate basis for each
day, during a specified observation period following the
conversion date. The daily settlement amount during each date of
the observation period consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash up to the principal amount of the note; and
|
|
|
Cadences common stock to the extent that the conversion
value exceeds the amount of cash paid upon conversion of the
Convertible Senior Notes.
|
In addition, if a fundamental change occurs prior to maturity
and provided that Cadences stock price is greater than
$18.00 per share, the conversion rate will increase by an
additional amount of up to $8.27 per share, for a holder that
elects to convert its Convertible Senior Notes in connection
with such fundamental change, which amount will be paid entirely
in cash. A fundamental change is any transaction or event
(whether by means of an exchange offer, liquidation, tender
offer, consolidation, merger, combination, reclassification,
recapitalization or otherwise) in which more than 50% of
Cadences common stock is exchanged for, converted into,
acquired for or constitutes solely the right to receive,
consideration. No fundamental change will have occurred if at
least 90% of the consideration received consists of shares of
common stock, or depositary receipts representing such shares,
that are:
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
listed on, a United States national securities exchange; or
|
|
|
Approved, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
approved, for quotation on a United States system of automated
dissemination of quotations of securities prices similar to the
NASDAQ National Market prior to its designation as a national
securities exchange.
|
As of September 27, 2008, none of the conditions allowing
the holders of the Convertible Senior Notes to convert had been
met.
10
Cadence evaluated the embedded conversion option in accordance
with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and concluded that the
embedded conversion option contained within the Convertible
Senior Notes should not be accounted for separately because the
conversion option is indexed to Cadences common stock and
is classified as stockholders equity. Furthermore, Cadence
evaluated the terms of the Convertible Senior Notes for a
beneficial conversion feature in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force, or EITF,
No. 98-5,
Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial
Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion
Ratios and EITF
No. 00-27,
Application of Issue
98-5 to
Certain Convertible Instruments and concluded there was no
beneficial conversion feature at the commitment date based on
the conversion rate of the Convertible Senior Notes relative to
the commitment date stock price.
Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes began accruing in
December 2006 and is payable semi-annually each
December 15th and June 15th.
Concurrently with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes,
Cadence entered into hedge transactions with various parties
whereby Cadence has the option to purchase up to
23.6 million shares of Cadences common stock at a
price of $21.15 per share, subject to adjustment. These options
expire on December 15, 2011, in the case of the 2011 Notes,
and December 15, 2013, in the case of the 2013 Notes, and
must be settled in net shares. The aggregate cost of these hedge
transactions was $119.8 million and has been recorded as a
reduction to Stockholders equity in accordance with EITF
No. 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own
Stock. The estimated fair value of the hedges acquired in
connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$11.7 million as of September 27, 2008. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of these hedges will not be recognized
as long as the instruments remain classified as equity.
In separate transactions, Cadence also sold warrants to various
parties for the purchase of up to 23.6 million shares of
Cadences common stock at a price of $31.50 per share in a
private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act. The warrants expire on various dates from
February 2012 through April 2012 in the case of the 2011 Notes,
and February 2014 through April 2014 in the case of the 2013
Notes, and must be settled in net shares. Cadence received
$39.4 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these
warrants, which has been recorded as a reduction to
Stockholders equity in accordance with EITF
No. 00-19.
The estimated fair value of the warrants sold in connection with
the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$5.2 million as of September 27, 2008. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of these warrants will not be
recognized as long as the instruments remain classified as
equity. The warrants will be included in diluted earnings per
share, or EPS, to the extent the impact is considered dilutive.
Zero
Coupon Zero Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023
In August 2003, Cadence issued $420.0 million principal
amount of its 2023 Notes to two initial purchasers in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to SEC
Rule 144A. Cadence received net proceeds of
$406.4 million after transaction fees of $13.6 million
that were recorded in Other long-term assets and were amortized
to interest expense using the straight-line method over five
years. In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior
Notes in December 2006, Cadence repurchased $189.6 million
principal amount of the 2023 Notes, and in August 2008, Cadence
repurchased $230.2 million principal amount of the 2023
Notes upon the election of the holders of the 2023 Notes and
pursuant to the terms of the 2023 Notes, for a total
consideration of $230.8 million, reducing the outstanding
2023 Note balance to $0.2 million as of September 27,
2008. Concurrently with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, Cadence
entered into hedge and warrant transactions, all of which
expired during the nine months ended September 27, 2008 and
no settlement was required.
Earnings
of Foreign Subsidiaries
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence
repatriated $200.0 million of earnings from a foreign
subsidiary, earnings which had previously been considered to be
indefinitely reinvested outside the United States and for which
deferred taxes had not been previously provided. Cadence
currently expects that an additional $117.9 million of
previously untaxed earnings from foreign subsidiaries will not
be indefinitely reinvested outside
11
of the United States. As a result, Cadence has accrued a tax
expense of $71.0 million during the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008 to provide for the potential U.S.,
state and foreign income taxes on these repatriations. Cadence
intends to indefinitely reinvest the remainder of its
undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, which
Cadence estimates to be $29.0 million for the year ending
January 3, 2009, to meet both the working capital and
long-term capital needs of its subsidiaries and of Cadence.
Internal
Revenue Service Examinations
The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and other tax authorities
regularly examine Cadences income tax returns. In July
2006, the IRS completed its field examination of Cadences
federal income tax returns for the tax years 2000 through 2002
and issued a Revenue Agents Report, or RAR, in which the
IRS proposed to assess an aggregate tax deficiency for the
three-year period of approximately $324.0 million. In
November 2006, the IRS revised the proposed aggregate tax
deficiency for the three-year period to be approximately
$318.0 million. The IRS is contesting Cadences
qualification for deferred recognition of certain proceeds
received from restitution and settlement in connection with
litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency for
this item is approximately $152.0 million. The remaining
proposed tax deficiency of approximately $166.0 million is
primarily related to proposed adjustments to Cadences
transfer pricing arrangements with its foreign subsidiaries and
to Cadences deductions for foreign trade income. The IRS
took similar positions with respect to Cadences transfer
pricing arrangements in the prior examination period and may
make similar claims against Cadences transfer pricing
arrangements in future examinations. Cadence has filed a timely
protest with the IRS and will seek resolution of the issues
through the Appeals Office of the IRS, or the Appeals Office.
Cadence believes that the proposed IRS adjustments are
inconsistent with applicable tax laws and Cadence is vigorously
challenging these proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final
Statutory Notice of Deficiency, but the IRS imposes interest on
the proposed deficiencies until the matters are resolved.
Interest is compounded daily at rates that are published and
adjusted quarterly by the IRS and have been between 4% and 10%
since 2001. The IRS is currently examining Cadences
federal income tax returns for the tax years 2003 through 2005.
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence
recognized a $7.9 million decrease in the net liabilities
for unrecognized tax benefits based on new information received
during the period, which Cadence accounted for as a
$7.9 million increase in the balance of Common stock and
capital in excess of par value.
Cadence believes that it is reasonably possible that the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for its transfer pricing
arrangements with its foreign subsidiaries could significantly
increase or decrease during the fiscal year ending
January 3, 2009 if the Appeals Office develops new
settlement guidelines that change Cadences measurement of
the tax benefits to be recognized upon effective settlement with
the IRS. Because of the uncertain impact of any potential
settlement guidelines, Cadence cannot currently provide an
estimate of the range of the reasonably possible change.
Cadence also believes that it is reasonably possible that the
total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits related to the value
of stock options included in its cost sharing arrangements with
its foreign subsidiaries could significantly increase or
decrease during the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009
based on the outcome of the IRS appeal of Xilinx, Inc. v.
Commissioner, which is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit. Cadence believes that the range of reasonably
possible change is an increase in unrecognized tax benefits of
$6.4 million to a decrease of unrecognized tax benefit of
$1.6 million.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
RESTRUCTURING
AND OTHER CHARGES
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence
determined that it would initiate a plan of restructuring
intended to decrease costs by reducing its workforce throughout
the company, and that the expenses associated with that
reduction were both probable and estimable. Cadence recorded
Restructuring and other charges of approximately
$48.1 million during the three months ended
September 27, 2008, which included estimated severance
payments, severance-related benefits and costs for outplacement
services for at least 625 employees. Cadence expects to
record an additional $17.0 million to $22.0 million in
restructuring costs during the three
12
months ending January 3, 2009 related to other aspects of
this restructuring that were not probable as of
September 27, 2008, or that should be recorded as the
expense is incurred. Cadence accounted for the termination and
benefits charges associated with this Restructuring in
accordance with SFAS No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits An Amendment
of FASB Statements No. 5 and 43.
As of September 27, 2008, Cadence had not made any payments
in connection with this restructuring plan, and the entire
$48.1 million is included in Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Due to
varying regulations in the jurisdictions and countries in which
Cadence operates, Cadence expects substantially all termination
benefits to be paid by January 2, 2010.
In connection with this restructuring initiative, Cadence has
recorded estimated provisions for severance payments,
severance-related
benefits and outplacement costs. Cadence regularly evaluates the
adequacy of its restructuring accrual, and adjusts the balance
based on changes in estimates and assumptions. Cadence may incur
future charges for changes in estimates related to amounts
previously recorded and for additional activities under this
restructuring.
|
|
NOTE 7.
|
GOODWILL
AND ACQUIRED INTANGIBLES
|
Goodwill
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, Cadence conducts a goodwill
impairment analysis annually and as necessary if changes in
facts and circumstances indicate that the fair value of
Cadences reporting unit may be less than its carrying
amount. Cadences goodwill impairment test consists of the
two steps required by SFAS No. 142. The first step
requires that Cadence compare the estimated fair value of its
single reporting unit to the carrying value of the reporting
units net assets, including goodwill. If the fair value of
the reporting unit is greater than the carrying value of its net
assets, goodwill is not considered to be impaired and no further
testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is
less than the carrying value of its net assets, Cadence would be
required to complete the second step of the test by analyzing
the fair value of its goodwill. If the carrying value of the
goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is
recorded.
To determine the reporting units fair value, Cadence uses
a combination of the income and market valuation approaches. In
determining its overall conclusion of reporting unit fair value,
Cadence considers the estimated values derived from both the
income and market valuation approaches and weighs the values
from each approach equally.
The income approach provides an estimate of fair value based on
discounted expected future cash flows. These expected future
cash flows are based on Cadences estimated market segment
growth rates, assumed market segment share growth rates,
estimated costs and appropriate discount rates based on the
reporting units weighted average cost of capital.
Cadences estimates of market segment growth, market
segment share growth and costs are based on historical data,
various internal estimates and a variety of external sources,
and are developed as part of Cadences routine long-range
planning process.
The market approach provides an estimate of the fair value of
Cadences one reporting unit using various price or market
multiples applied to the reporting units operating results
and then applying an appropriate control premium. The control
premium is determined by considering control premiums offered as
part of acquisitions in both Cadences market segment and
comparable market segments.
The most recent goodwill impairment analysis was completed
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, and
Cadence determined that no indicators of impairment existed as
of September 27, 2008. However, subsequent to
September 27, 2008, Cadence observed possible impairment
indicators including a further deterioration in the market in
which Cadence operates and a decrease in its market
capitalization. As such, Cadence determined indicators exist
subsequent to September 27, 2008 that indicate that the
fair value of Cadences reporting unit may be less than its
carrying amount. Accordingly, Cadence will complete an interim
goodwill impairment test during the three months ending
January 3, 2009. If the fair value of the reporting unit is
determined to be less than its carrying value, Cadence will
complete step two of the goodwill impairment test by evaluating
the fair value of its goodwill as required by
SFAS No. 142 and record an impairment charge, if
necessary.
13
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine
months ended September 27, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,310,211
|
|
Goodwill resulting from acquisition during the period
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
Additions due to earnouts
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
Tax benefits allocable to goodwill
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 27, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,315,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
Intangibles, net
Acquired intangibles with finite lives as of September 27,
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Existing technology and backlog
|
|
$
|
655,467
|
|
|
$
|
(619,979
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,488
|
|
Agreements and relationships
|
|
|
100,814
|
|
|
|
(62,507
|
)
|
|
|
38,307
|
|
Distribution rights
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
|
|
(15,803
|
)
|
|
|
14,297
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks and patents
|
|
|
29,867
|
|
|
|
(16,550
|
)
|
|
|
13,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
816,248
|
|
|
$
|
(714,839
|
)
|
|
$
|
101,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence
acquired intangible assets of $8.6 million, including
$0.6 million allocated to acquired in-process technology
related to Cadences acquisition of Chip Estimate
Corporation. The acquired in-process technology was immediately
expensed because technological feasibility had not been
established and no future alternative use existed. During the
nine months ended September 27, 2008, Cadence made cash
payments of $13.4 million for previously completed business
combinations and acquisitions of intangibles, $5.5 million
for business combinations completed during the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and $1.7 million for earnouts
related to previously completed business combinations that were
earned during the nine months ended September 27, 2008.
Acquired intangibles with finite lives as of December 29,
2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Existing technology and backlog
|
|
$
|
651,427
|
|
|
$
|
(602,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,266
|
|
Agreements and relationships
|
|
|
96,585
|
|
|
|
(51,791
|
)
|
|
|
44,794
|
|
Distribution rights
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
|
|
(13,545
|
)
|
|
|
16,555
|
|
Tradenames, trademarks and patents
|
|
|
29,367
|
|
|
|
(12,910
|
)
|
|
|
16,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
807,479
|
|
|
$
|
(680,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
127,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Amortization of acquired intangibles for the three and nine
months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
$
|
4,080
|
|
|
$
|
6,049
|
|
|
$
|
13,525
|
|
|
$
|
16,825
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
5,626
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
|
|
17,206
|
|
|
|
13,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
10,754
|
|
|
$
|
12,003
|
|
|
$
|
33,875
|
|
|
$
|
34,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of costs from existing technology is included in
Cost of product and Cost of services. Amortization of costs from
acquired maintenance contracts is included in Cost of
maintenance.
Estimated amortization expense for the following fiscal years
and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008 remaining period
|
|
$
|
10,343
|
|
2009
|
|
|
35,172
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,857
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17,554
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,064
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated amortization expense
|
|
$
|
101,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, Cadence is involved in various disputes and
litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to
intellectual property, mergers and acquisitions, licensing,
contracts, distribution arrangements and employee relations
matters. At least quarterly, Cadence reviews the status of each
significant matter and assesses its potential financial
exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal
proceeding is considered probable and the amount or the range of
loss can be estimated, Cadence accrues a liability for the
estimated loss in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. Legal proceedings are
subject to uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to
predict. Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only
on the best information available at the time. As additional
information becomes available, Cadence reassesses the potential
liability related to pending claims and litigation matters and
may revise estimates.
While the outcome of disputes and litigation matters cannot be
predicted with any certainty, management does not believe that
the outcome of any current matters will have a material adverse
effect on Cadences consolidated financial position,
liquidity or results of operations.
See also Note 16 Subsequent Events.
Other
Contingencies
Cadence provides its customers with a warranty on sales of
hardware products for a
90-day
period. These warranties are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 5. To date, Cadence has not incurred any
significant costs related to warranty obligations.
Cadences product license and services agreements typically
include a limited indemnification provision for claims from
third parties relating to Cadences intellectual property.
Such indemnification provisions are accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 5. The indemnification is generally
limited to the amount paid by the customer. To date, claims
under such indemnification provisions have not been significant.
15
|
|
NOTE 9.
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income (loss), the numerator, by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, less unvested restricted
stock grants, the denominator, during the period. Diluted net
income per share gives effect to equity instruments considered
to be potential common shares, if dilutive, computed using the
treasury stock method of accounting. In periods in which a net
loss is recorded, potentially dilutive equity instruments would
decrease the loss per share and therefore are not added to the
weighted average shares outstanding.
Cadence accounts for the effect of its 2023 Notes in the diluted
net income per share calculation using the
if-converted
method of accounting. Under that method, the 2023 Notes are
assumed to be converted to shares (weighted for the number of
days outstanding in the period) at a conversion price of $15.65,
and amortization of transaction fees, net of taxes, related to
the 2023 Notes is added back to net income.
EITF
No. 04-08,
Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of
Contingently Convertible Debt and the Effect on Diluted Earnings
per Share, requires Cadence to include in diluted earnings
per share the shares of Cadences common stock into which
the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011 and the
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013, together, the
Convertible Senior Notes, may be converted. However, since the
Convertible Senior Notes meet the qualification of an Instrument
C under EITF
No. 90-19,
Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash
Upon Conversion, and because cash will be paid for the
principal amount of the obligation upon conversion, the only
shares that will be considered for inclusion in diluted net
income per share are those relating to the excess of the
conversion premium over the principal amount, using the
if-converted method of accounting.
The calculations for basic and diluted net income (loss) per
share for the three and nine months ended September 27,
2008 and September 29, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(169,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,732
|
|
|
$
|
(215,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
176,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
252,915
|
|
|
|
272,977
|
|
|
|
256,119
|
|
|
|
272,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(169,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,732
|
|
|
$
|
(215,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
176,749
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of 2023 Notes transaction fees, net of tax
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as adjusted
|
|
$
|
(169,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,951
|
|
|
$
|
(215,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
177,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and potential common shares used to
calculate basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
252,915
|
|
|
|
272,977
|
|
|
|
256,119
|
|
|
|
272,354
|
|
Convertible Senior Notes
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
2023 Notes
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
Options
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
8,217
|
|
Restricted stock and ESPP shares
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
2,514
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
2,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and potential common shares used to
calculate diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
|
252,915
|
|
|
|
299,506
|
|
|
|
256,119
|
|
|
|
297,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
(0.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following table presents the potential shares of
Cadences common stock outstanding for the three and nine
months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007
that were not included in the computation of diluted net income
(loss) per share because the effect of including these shares
would have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Options to purchase shares of common stock (various expiration
dates through 2017)
|
|
|
39,257
|
|
|
|
10,995
|
|
|
|
39,257
|
|
|
|
11,840
|
|
Non-vested shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
7,673
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
2023 Notes
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock related to the
Convertible Senior Notes (various expiration dates through 2014)
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
|
|
23,640
|
|
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock related to the 2023
Notes (various expiration dates through May 2008)
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,717
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
14,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total potential common shares excluded
|
|
|
70,581
|
|
|
|
49,352
|
|
|
|
70,581
|
|
|
|
50,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10.
|
STOCK
REPURCHASE PROGRAMS
|
As of September 27, 2008, Cadences Board of Directors
had authorized the following programs to repurchase shares of
Cadences common stock in the open market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Authorization Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Authorization
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
December 2006
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
February 2008
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
354,386
|
|
August 2008
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
The shares repurchased under Cadences stock repurchase
programs during the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
27,034
|
|
|
|
17,900
|
|
Total cost of repurchased shares
|
|
$
|
57,714
|
|
|
$
|
250,961
|
|
|
$
|
273,950
|
|
|
$
|
372,416
|
|
17
|
|
NOTE 11.
|
RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
The changes in retained earnings for the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of June 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,072,555
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(169,066
|
)
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
(35,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 27, 2008
|
|
$
|
868,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 29, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,162,441
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(215,083
|
)
|
Re-issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
(79,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 27, 2008
|
|
$
|
868,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cadence records a gain or loss on re-issuance of treasury stock
based on the total proceeds received in the transaction. Gains
on the re-issuance of treasury stock are recorded as a component
of Capital in excess of par in Stockholders Equity. Losses
on the re-issuance of treasury stock are recorded as a component
of Capital in excess of par to the extent that there are gains
to offset the losses. If there are no treasury stock gains in
Capital in excess of par, the losses upon re-issuance of
treasury stock are recorded as a component of Retained earnings
in Stockholders Equity. Cadence recorded losses on the
re-issuance of treasury stock as a component of Retained
earnings of $35.2 million and $79.1 million during the
three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
respectively.
|
|
NOTE 12.
|
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign currency
translation gains and losses and unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale marketable securities, net of related tax
effects. These items have been excluded from net income (loss)
and are reflected instead in Stockholders Equity.
Cadences comprehensive income (loss) for the three and
nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29,
2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(169,066
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,732
|
|
|
$
|
(215,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
176,749
|
|
Foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
5,354
|
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
7,676
|
|
Changes in unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification
adjustment for realized gains and losses, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(6,677
|
)
|
|
|
(2,330
|
)
|
|
|
(1,759
|
)
|
|
|
(4,024
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(176,160
|
)
|
|
$
|
75,772
|
|
|
$
|
(214,621
|
)
|
|
$
|
179,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
NOTE 13.
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
|
Cadences Other income (expense), net, for the three and
nine months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29,
2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
3,989
|
|
|
$
|
12,609
|
|
|
$
|
17,823
|
|
|
$
|
37,472
|
|
Gains on sale of non-marketable securities
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of available-for-sale securities
(Note 3)
|
|
|
(9,379
|
)
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
(7,945
|
)
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of non-marketable securities in
Cadences non-qualified deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
(4,379
|
)
|
|
|
6,562
|
|
Gains (losses) on foreign exchange
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
Equity in loss from investments, net
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
(2,504
|
)
|
Write-down of investment securities (Note 3)
|
|
|
(2,362
|
)
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
(10,666
|
)
|
|
|
(2,550
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(7,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,201
|
|
|
$
|
(3,701
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14.
|
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
|
The supplemental cash flow information for the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Paid During the Period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
3,594
|
|
|
$
|
3,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes, including foreign withholding tax
|
|
$
|
25,183
|
|
|
$
|
12,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options assumed for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock issued for payment under a performance-based
bonus plan
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
8,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of
taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cadence adopted FASB Interpretation, or FIN, No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on
December 31, 2006, the first day of fiscal 2007. The
cumulative effect of adopting FIN No. 48 was reported
as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or
other appropriate components of equity or net assets) in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, which amounts were
non-cash items in Cadences Statement of Cash Flows for the
nine months ended September 29, 2007.
19
|
|
NOTE 15.
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHY REPORTING
|
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, requires disclosures
of certain information regarding operating segments, products
and services, geographic areas of operation and major customers.
SFAS No. 131 reporting is based upon the
management approach: how management organizes the
companys operating segments for which separate financial
information is (i) available and (ii) evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how
to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
Cadences chief operating decision maker is its President
and Chief Executive Officer or an authorized person or persons
performing functions similar to a principal executive officer,
or PEO.
Cadences PEO reviews Cadences consolidated results
within one segment. In making operating decisions, the PEO
primarily considers consolidated financial information,
accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by
geographic region.
Outside the United States, Cadence markets and supports its
products and services primarily through its subsidiaries.
Revenue is attributed to geography based on the country in which
the product is used or services are delivered. Long-lived assets
are attributed to geography based on the country where the
assets are located.
The following table presents a summary of revenue by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
91,032
|
|
|
$
|
160,895
|
|
|
$
|
339,801
|
|
|
$
|
523,147
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
10,403
|
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
25,780
|
|
|
|
21,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
101,435
|
|
|
|
166,205
|
|
|
|
365,581
|
|
|
|
545,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
12,134
|
|
|
|
14,784
|
|
|
|
38,932
|
|
|
|
46,804
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
5,076
|
|
|
|
44,373
|
|
|
|
14,947
|
|
|
|
45,105
|
|
Other Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
35,066
|
|
|
|
40,492
|
|
|
|
126,474
|
|
|
|
128,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
52,276
|
|
|
|
99,649
|
|
|
|
180,353
|
|
|
|
220,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
46,555
|
|
|
|
88,863
|
|
|
|
162,940
|
|
|
|
242,442
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
32,222
|
|
|
|
46,207
|
|
|
|
102,405
|
|
|
|
149,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japan and Asia
|
|
|
78,777
|
|
|
|
135,070
|
|
|
|
265,345
|
|
|
|
391,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
232,488
|
|
|
$
|
400,924
|
|
|
$
|
811,279
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue for
the three months ended September 27, 2008 and one customer
accounted for 14% of total revenue during the three months ended
September 29, 2007. No one customer accounted for 10% or
more of total revenue during the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 or during the nine months ended
September 29, 2007.
As of September 27, 2008, one customer accounted for 12%,
one customer accounted for 11% and one customer accounted for
10% of Cadences Receivables, net and Installment contract
receivables. As of December 29, 2007, one customer
accounted for 11% and one customer accounted for 10% of
Cadences Receivables, net and Installment contract
receivables.
20
The following table presents a summary of long-lived assets by
geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
324,312
|
|
|
$
|
303,347
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas
|
|
|
324,359
|
|
|
|
303,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
Other Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
6,218
|
|
|
|
7,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
7,237
|
|
|
|
9,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Asia:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
21,720
|
|
|
|
25,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Japan and Asia
|
|
|
27,600
|
|
|
|
27,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
359,196
|
|
|
$
|
339,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 16.
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
Executive
Resignations
On October 15, 2008, Cadence announced that Michael J.
Fister had resigned as its President and Chief Executive Officer
and from its Board of Directors and, in connection with the
resignation, its Board of Directors formed an Interim Office of
the Chief Executive, or the IOCE, to oversee the day-to-day
running of Cadences operations. The members of the IOCE
are John B. Shoven, Ph.D., Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Cadence, whose role as a member of the IOCE will be
to provide oversight on behalf of the Board of Directors of
Cadence, Lip-Bu Tan, Interim Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Cadence, Charlie Huang, Senior Vice President of
Cadence, and Kevin S. Palatnik, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Cadence. Mr. Huang also holds the
position of Chief of Staff of the IOCE. In addition, Cadence
announced the resignations of four executive officers. Pursuant
to the resignations and the terms of the respective employment
agreements of these executive officers, Cadence expects to take
a charge of $16.6 million during the three months ending
January 3, 2009, which includes $7.5 million of
stock-based compensation related to the acceleration of
restricted stock awards and stock options.
Securities
Litigation Complaints
Three complaints were filed in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California, all alleging violations
of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, on behalf of a purported class of
purchasers of Cadences common stock. The first such
complaint was filed on October 29, 2008, captioned
Hu v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Michael J. Fister,
William Porter and Kevin S. Palatnik; the second such complaint
was filed on November 4, 2008, captioned Vyas v.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc., Michael J. Fister, and Kevin
S. Palatnik; and the third such complaint was filed on
November 21, 2008, captioned Collins v. Cadence Design
Systems, Inc., Michael J. Fister, John B. Shoven, Kevin S.
Palatnik and William Porter. Cadence intends to vigorously
defend these and any other securities lawsuits that may be filed.
21
Two derivative complaints have been filed in Santa Clara
County Superior Court. The first was filed on November 20,
2008, and captioned Ury Priel, derivatively on behalf of nominal
defendant Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. John B. Shoven,
Lip-Bu Tan, Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Donald L.
Lucas, Sr., Roger Siboni, George Scalise, Michael J.
Fister, and Doe Defendants 1-15. The second was filed on
December 1, 2008, and captioned Mark Levine, derivatively
on behalf of nominal defendant Cadence Design Systems,
Inc. v. John B. Shoven, Lip-Bu Tan, Alberto
Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Donald L. Lucas, Sr., Roger
Siboni, George Scalise, Michael J. Fister, John Swainson and Doe
Defendants 1-10. These complaints purport to bring suit
derivatively, on behalf of Cadence, against certain of
Cadences current and former directors for alleged breach
of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste
of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. Many of the
allegations underlying these claims are similar or identical to
the allegations in the securities class action lawsuits
described above. Cadence is analyzing these derivative
complaints and will respond to them appropriately.
In light of the preliminary status of these lawsuits, Cadence
cannot predict the claims, allegations, class period (in the
case of the class actions), or outcome of these matters. Cadence
cannot provide any assurances that the final outcome of these
lawsuits or any other proceedings that may arise in the future
will not have a material adverse effect on its business, results
of operations, or financial condition. Litigation can be
time-consuming and expensive and could divert managements
time and attention from Cadences business, which could
have a material adverse effect on its revenues and results of
operations. The adverse resolution of any specific lawsuit or
proceeding could also have a material adverse effect on
Cadences business, results of operations, financial
condition, and cash flows.
22
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes
thereto included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
or this Quarterly Report, and in conjunction with our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007. Certain of
these statements, including, without limitation, statements
regarding the extent and timing of future revenues and expenses
and customer demand, statements regarding the deployment of our
products, statements regarding our reliance on third parties and
other statements using words such as anticipates,
believes, could, estimates,
expects, intends, may,
plans, should, will and
would, and words of similar import and the negatives
thereof, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements
are predictions based upon our current expectations about future
events. Actual results could vary materially as a result of
certain factors, including but not limited to, those expressed
in these statements. We refer you to the Risk
Factors, Results of Operations,
Disclosures About Market Risk, and Liquidity
and Capital Resources sections contained in this Quarterly
Report, and the risks discussed in our other Securities Exchange
Commission, or SEC, filings, which identify important risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in the forward-looking
statements.
We urge you to consider these factors carefully in evaluating
the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly
Report. All subsequent written or oral forward-looking
statements attributable to our company or persons acting on our
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these
cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included
in this Quarterly Report are made only as of the date of this
Quarterly Report. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation,
to update these forward-looking statements.
Overview
We develop electronic design automation, or EDA, software and
hardware. We license software, sell or lease hardware
technology, provide maintenance for our software and hardware
and provide design, methodology and education services
throughout the world to help manage and accelerate product
development processes for electronics. Our broad range of
products and services are used by the worlds leading
electronics companies to design and develop complex integrated
circuits, or ICs, and electronics systems.
We primarily generate revenue from licensing our EDA software,
selling or leasing our hardware technology, providing
maintenance for our software and hardware and providing design
and methodology services. Our revenue recognition is
significantly affected by the mix of license types executed in
any given period. Our revenue may also be deferred until
payments become due and payable or cash is received from certain
customers and for certain contracts. Substantially all of our
revenue is generated from IC manufacturers, IC designers and
electronics systems companies and is dependent upon their
commencement of new design projects. As a result, our revenue is
significantly influenced by our customers business outlook
and investment in the introduction of new products and the
improvement of existing products.
We have identified certain items that management uses as
performance indicators to manage our business, including
revenue, certain elements of operating expenses and cash flow
from operations, and we describe these items more fully below
under the heading Results of Operations and
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
During 2007 and the first nine months of 2008, we saw increasing
pressures on the research and development budgets in our
customer base due to the deceleration of growth in the
electronics systems and semiconductor industries and the
deteriorating macroeconomic environment. In this slowing and
price-conscious environment, customers are looking for more
flexibility in the type of software and hardware products they
purchase and how and when they purchase them.
Facing uncertainty and cost pressures in their own businesses,
some of our customers are waiting to purchase our products and
are increasingly seeking more aggressive purchasing terms and
conditions. As a result of this trend, we have forecasted lower
business levels for the remainder of 2008. To enable us to keep
our focus on the value of our technology and to assist with
customer demands, we are moving to a license mix that will
provide our customers with greater flexibility and will result
in increased ratable revenue for us.
23
Our operating results are affected by the mix of license types
executed in any given period. We license software using three
different license types: subscription, term and perpetual.
Product revenue associated with term and perpetual licenses is
generally recognized at the beginning of the license period,
whereas product revenue associated with subscription licenses is
recognized over multiple periods during the term of the license.
The timing of revenue recognition is also affected by changes in
the extent to which existing contracts contain flexible payment
terms and by changes in contractual arrangements with existing
customers (e.g., customers transitioning from subscription
license arrangements to term license arrangements). Our license
mix is changing such that a higher proportion of licenses will
require ratable revenue recognition and we expect to have fewer
changes in existing contractual arrangements with existing
customers, and this will result in a decrease in our expected
revenue for the second half of fiscal year 2008 and for fiscal
2009. Due to the lower business levels and the change in the
license mix noted above, we will recognize a net loss for fiscal
year 2008.
We plan operating expense levels primarily based on forecasted
revenue levels. To offset some of the impact of our expected
decrease in revenue, we have implemented and plan to implement
additional cost savings initiatives, including reducing
headcount, decreasing employee bonuses and reducing other
discretionary spending. During the three months ended
September 27, 2008, we determined that we would initiate a
restructuring plan to improve our operating results and to align
our cost structure with expected revenue. This restructuring is
intended to decrease costs by reducing our workforce throughout
the company by at least 625 employees. We expect to record
an additional $17.0 million to $22.0 million in
restructuring costs during the three months ending
January 3, 2009 related to other aspects of this
restructuring that were not probable as of September 27,
2008, and thus should be recorded as the expense is incurred. We
expect ongoing annual savings of at least $150.0 million
related to this plan of restructuring.
Because of the widespread problems in global capital markets
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, we
decided to repatriate $200.0 million of earnings from a
foreign subsidiary, earnings which had previously been
considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United
States and for which deferred taxes had not been previously
provided. We currently expect that an additional
$117.9 million of previously untaxed earnings from foreign
subsidiaries will not be indefinitely reinvested outside of the
United States. As a result, we have accrued a tax expense of
$71.0 million during the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 to provide for the potential U.S., state
and foreign income taxes on these repatriations. We intend to
indefinitely reinvest the remainder of undistributed earnings of
our foreign subsidiaries, which we estimate to be
$29.0 million for the year ending January 3, 2009 to
meet both the working capital and long-term capital needs of our
subsidiaries and of Cadence.
Product performance and size specifications of the mobile and
other consumer electronics market are requiring electronic
systems to be smaller, consume less power and provide multiple
functions in one
system-on-chip,
or SoC, or
system-in-package,
or SiP. The design challenge is also becoming more complex with
each new generation of electronics and as providers of EDA
solutions are required to deliver products that address these
technical challenges and improve the efficiency and productivity
of the design process.
With the addition of emerging nanometer design considerations to
the already burgeoning set of traditional design tasks, complex
SoC or IC design can no longer be accomplished using a
collection of discrete design tools. What previously consisted
of sequential design activities must be merged and accomplished
nearly simultaneously without time-consuming data translation
steps. We combine our design technologies into
platforms addressing four major design activities:
functional verification, digital IC design, custom IC design and
system interconnect design. The four
Cadence®
design platforms are
Incisive®
functional verification,
Encounter®
digital IC design,
Virtuoso®
custom design and
Allegro®
system interconnect design platforms. In addition, we augment
these platform product offerings with a set of design for
manufacturing, or DFM, products that service both the digital
and custom IC design flows. These four platforms, together with
our DFM products, comprise our primary product lines.
Withdrawal
of Proposed Acquisition of Mentor Graphics Corporation
On May 2, 2008, we made a proposal to the board of
directors of Mentor Graphics to acquire all of the outstanding
shares of Mentor Graphics common stock for cash consideration of
$16.00 per Mentor Graphics share, representing a total value of
approximately $1.6 billion. On May 23, 2008, the
Mentor Graphics board of directors
24
informed us that it did not wish to pursue discussions with us
given Mentor Graphics desire to stay independent. On
June 17, 2008, we publicly announced our offer and Mentor
Graphics publicly confirmed that it received an unsolicited
offer from us and that it previously rejected our offer. On
August 15, 2008, we announced that we had withdrawn our
proposal to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Mentor
Graphics common stock due to Mentor Graphics failure to
engage in substantive discussions on our proposal, which
prevented us from confirming for our financing sources the
significant synergies associated with the proposed transaction,
our revised business outlook and the economic climate, which led
to our conclusion that the financing terms for the proposed
transaction were no longer attractive to our stockholders.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, we
purchased approximately 4.3 million shares of Mentor
Graphics common stock in connection with our proposed
acquisition of Mentor Graphics. Subsequent to the withdrawal of
our acquisition offer, we sold our entire equity interest in
Mentor Graphics at a loss of $9.4 million. In addition, we
expensed legal and other acquisition related costs of
$3.2 million upon withdrawal of our acquisition offer.
Subsequent
Event
On October 15, 2008, we announced that Michael J. Fister
had resigned as our President and Chief Executive Officer and
from our Board of Directors and, in connection with the
resignation, our Board of Directors formed an Interim Office of
the Chief Executive, or the IOCE, to oversee the day-to-day
running of our operations. The members of the IOCE are John B.
Shoven, Ph.D., Chairman of our Board of Directors, whose
role as a member of the IOCE will be to provide oversight on
behalf of our Board of Directors, Lip-Bu Tan, Interim Vice
Chairman of our Board of Directors, Charlie Huang, our Senior
Vice President, and Kevin S. Palatnik, our Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Huang also holds the
position of Chief of Staff of the IOCE. Our Board of Directors
has also formed a search committee to identify qualified
candidates to lead our company on a permanent basis.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
In preparing our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we
make assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a
significant impact on our revenue, operating income and net
income, as well as on the value of certain assets and
liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We
base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical
experience and various other factors that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
materially from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. At least quarterly, we evaluate our assumptions,
judgments and estimates and make changes accordingly.
Historically, our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative
to our critical accounting estimates have not differed
materially from actual results. Our critical accounting estimate
for accounting for income taxes is described below because of
our repatriation of earnings from foreign subsidiaries during
the three months ended September 27, 2008, and our critical
accounting estimate for accounting for restructuring charges is
also described below because of our current restructuring
efforts.
For further information about our other critical accounting
estimates, see the discussion under the heading Critical
Accounting Estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
Accounting
for income taxes
We provide for the effect of income taxes in our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard, or SFAS, No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes and FASB Interpretation,
or FIN, No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109.
Under SFAS No. 109, income tax expense or benefit is
recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the
current year, and for deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an
entitys financial statements or tax returns. We must make
significant assumptions, judgments and estimates to determine
our current provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets
and liabilities and any valuation allowance to be recorded
against our deferred tax assets. Our judgments, assumptions and
estimates relating to the current provision for income taxes
include the geographic mix and amount of income (loss), our
25
interpretation of current tax laws, and possible outcomes of
current and future audits conducted by foreign and domestic tax
authorities. Our judgments also include anticipating the tax
positions we will take on tax returns prior to actually
preparing and filing the tax returns. Changes in our business,
tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws, and developments in
current and future tax audits, could significantly impact the
amounts provided for income taxes in our results of operations,
financial position or cash flows. Our assumptions, judgments and
estimates relating to the value of our net deferred tax assets
take into account predictions of the amount and category of
future taxable income (loss) from various sources, including tax
planning strategies that would, if necessary, be implemented to
prevent a loss carryforward or tax credit carryforward from
expiring unused. Actual operating results or other events that
cause us to change our expectations of the amount and category
of income (loss) in future years could render our current
assumptions, judgments and estimates of recoverable net deferred
taxes inaccurate, thus materially affecting our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
Under FIN No. 48, we may only recognize an income tax
position in our financial statements that we judge is more
likely than not to be sustained solely on its technical
merits in a tax audit, including resolution of any related
appeals or litigation processes. To make this judgment, we must
interpret the application of complex and sometimes ambiguous tax
laws, regulations, and practices. If an income tax position
meets the more likely than not recognition
threshold, then we must measure the amount of the tax benefit to
be recognized by determining the largest amount of tax benefit
that has a greater than a 50% likelihood of being realized upon
effective settlement with a taxing authority that has full
knowledge of all of the relevant facts. It is inherently
difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as this
requires us to determine the probability of various possible
settlement outcomes. To determine if a tax position is
effectively settled, we must also estimate the likelihood that a
taxing authority would review a tax position after a tax
examination had otherwise been completed. We must also determine
when it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized
tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease in the
12 months after each reporting date. These judgments are
difficult because a taxing authority may change its behavior as
a result of our disclosures in our financial statements that are
based on the requirements of FIN No. 48. We must
re-evaluate our income tax positions on a quarterly basis to
consider factors such as changes in facts or circumstances,
changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and
new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement
would result in recognition of a tax benefit or an additional
charge to the tax provision.
We are also required to assess whether the earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries will be indefinitely reinvested outside the
United States. Because of widespread problems in global capital
markets during the three months ended September 27, 2008,
we decided to repatriate $200.0 million of earnings from a
foreign subsidiary, earnings which had previously been
considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United
States and for which deferred taxes had not been previously
provided. We currently expect that an additional
$117.9 million of previously untaxed earnings from foreign
subsidiaries will not be indefinitely reinvested outside of the
United States. As a result, we have accrued a tax expense of
$71.0 million during the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 to provide for the potential U.S., state
and foreign income taxes on these repatriations. To calculate
this tax expense, we were required to estimate the geographic
mix of profits and losses earned by us and our subsidiaries in
tax jurisdictions with a broad range of income and dividend
withholding tax rates, the impact of foreign exchange rate
fluctuations, and the potential outcomes of current and future
tax audits. Changes in our actual or projected operating
results, tax laws or our interpretation of tax laws, foreign
exchange rates and developments in current and future tax audits
could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes
in our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Restructuring
charges
We account for the termination and benefits portions of our
restructurings in accordance with SFAS No. 112,
Employers Accounting for Postemployment
Benefits An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 5
and 43 and we account for any facilities and asset-related
portions of our restructurings in accordance with
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities.
We record estimated provisions for termination and benefits
costs associated with our restructuring plans when it is
probable we will initiate a reduction in our workforce and when
the costs associated with that reduction are estimable. In order
to estimate the costs associated with these workforce
reductions, we are required make certain assumptions about the
size of the reduction and the resulting termination and benefits
costs. These assumptions and
26
estimates may change as we implement the restructuring plan and
we may incur future charges or credits for changes in estimates
related to amounts previously recorded.
Our restructuring plan initiatives have also required us to make
a number of estimates and assumptions related to losses on
excess facilities vacated or consolidated, particularly
estimating when, if at all, we will be able to sublet vacated
facilities and, if we do, the sublease terms. Closure and space
reduction costs that are part of our restructuring charges
include payments required under leases, less any applicable
estimated sublease income after the facilities are abandoned,
lease buyout costs and certain contractual costs to maintain
facilities during the abandonment period.
We regularly evaluate the adequacy of our restructuring accrual,
and adjust the balance based on changes in estimates and
assumptions. We may incur future charges for new restructuring
activities as well as changes in estimates to amounts previously
recorded.
Results
of Operations
We primarily generate revenue from licensing our EDA software,
selling or leasing our hardware technology, providing
maintenance for our software and hardware and providing design
and methodology services. We principally utilize three license
types: subscription, term and perpetual. The different license
types provide a customer with different conditions of use for
our products, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
The right to access new technology;
|
|
|
The duration of the license; and
|
|
|
Payment timing.
|
Customer decisions regarding these aspects of license
transactions determine the license type, timing of revenue
recognition and potential future business activity. For example,
if a customer chooses a fixed duration of use, this will result
in either a subscription or term license. A business implication
of this decision is that, at the expiration of the license
period, the customer must decide whether to continue using the
technology and therefore renew the license agreement. Because
larger customers generally use products from two or more of our
five product groups, rarely will a large customer completely
terminate its relationship with us at expiration of the license.
See the discussion under the heading Critical Accounting
Estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 for additional
description of license types and timing of revenue recognition.
Although we believe that pricing volatility has not generally
been a material component of the change in our revenue from
period to period, we believe that the amount of revenue
recognized in future periods will depend on, among other things,
the competitiveness of our new technology, the length of our
sales cycle, and the size, duration, terms, type and timing of
our:
|
|
|
|
|
Contract renewals with existing customers;
|
|
|
Additional sales to existing customers; and
|
|
|
Sales to new customers.
|
A substantial portion of our total revenue is recognized over
multiple periods. However, a significant portion of our product
revenue is recognized upon delivery of licensed software, which
generally occurs upon the later of the effective date of the
arrangement or delivery of the software product.
The value and duration of contracts, and consequently product
revenue recognized, is affected by the competitiveness of our
products. Product revenue recognized in any period is also
affected by the extent to which customers purchase subscription,
term or perpetual licenses, and the extent to which contracts
contain flexible payment terms. The timing of revenue
recognition is also affected by changes in the extent to which
existing contracts contain flexible payment terms and by changes
in contractual arrangements with existing customers (e.g.,
customers transitioning from subscription license arrangements
to term license arrangements).
27
Revenue
and Revenue Mix
We analyze our software and hardware businesses by product
group, combining revenues for both product and maintenance
because of their interrelationship. We have formulated a design
solution strategy that combines our design technologies into
platforms, which are included in the various product
groups described below.
Our product groups are:
Functional Verification: Products in this
group, which include the Incisive functional verification
platform, are used to verify that the high level, logical
representation of an IC design is functionally correct.
Digital IC Design: Products in this group,
which include the Encounter digital IC design platform, are used
to accurately convert the high-level, logical representation of
a digital IC into a detailed physical blueprint and then
detailed design information showing how the IC will be
physically implemented. This data is used for creation of the
photomasks used in chip manufacture.
Custom IC Design: Our custom design products,
which include the Virtuoso custom design platform, are used for
ICs that must be designed at the transistor level, including
analog, radio frequency, memories, high performance digital
blocks and standard cell libraries. Detailed design information
showing how an IC will be physically implemented is used for
creation of the photomasks used in chip manufacture.
System Interconnect Design: This product group
consists of our printed circuit board, or PCB, and IC package
design products, including the Allegro and
OrCAD®
products. The Allegro system interconnect design platform
enables consistent co-design of interconnects across ICs, IC
packages and PCBs, while the OrCAD line focuses on
cost-effective, entry-level PCB solutions.
Design for Manufacturing: Included in this
product group are our physical verification and analysis
products. These products are used to analyze and verify that the
physical blueprint of the IC has been constructed correctly and
can be manufactured successfully.
Revenue
by Period
The following table shows our revenue for the three and nine
months ended September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007
and the percentage change in revenue between periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
107.6
|
|
|
$
|
273.8
|
|
|
|
(61)%
|
|
$
|
422.4
|
|
|
$
|
775.5
|
|
|
|
(46)%
|
Services
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
98.8
|
|
|
|
96.0
|
|
|
|
3%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
92.0
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
(4)%
|
|
|
290.1
|
|
|
|
285.6
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
232.5
|
|
|
$
|
400.9
|
|
|
|
(42)%
|
|
$
|
811.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,157.1
|
|
|
|
(30)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue decreased in the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008, as compared to the three and nine
months ended September 29, 2007, primarily because of a
challenging and price-conscious economic environment, a longer
sales cycle and changes to our license mix which has resulted in
a higher proportion of revenue being recognized over multiple
periods during the term of the license and decreased revenue
recognized at the beginning of the license. As a result, product
revenue decreased for all product groups, and particularly for
Custom IC Design, Digital IC Design and Functional Verification
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the three months ended September 29, 2007, and
for Digital IC Design, Custom IC Design, and Functional
Verification products during the nine months ended
September 27, 2008, as compared to the nine months ended
September 29, 2007.
Our product revenue is affected by the mix of license types
executed in any given period. We license software using three
different license types: subscription, term and perpetual.
Product revenue associated with term and perpetual licenses is
generally recognized at the beginning of the license period,
whereas product revenue
28
associated with subscription licenses is recognized over
multiple periods during the term of the license. Our expected
revenue for the remainder of fiscal 2008 will decrease due to
the slowing and price-conscious environment, as well as the
changes to our license mix.
Revenue
by Product Group
The following table shows for the past five consecutive quarters
the percentage of product and related maintenance revenue
contributed by each of our five product groups, and Services and
other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
March 29,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Functional Verification
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
Digital IC Design
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
|
|
27%
|
|
Custom IC Design
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
System Interconnect
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
Design for Manufacturing
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Services and other
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described under the heading Critical Accounting
Estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, certain of our
licenses allow customers the ability to remix among software
products. Additionally, we have licensed a combination of our
products to customers with the actual product selection and
number of licensed users to be determined at a later date. For
these arrangements, we estimate the allocation of the revenue to
product groups based upon the expected usage of our products by
these customers. The actual usage of our products by these
customers may differ and, if that proves to be the case, the
revenue allocation in the above table would differ.
Although we believe the methodology of allocating revenue to
product groups is reasonable, there can be no assurance that
such allocated amounts reflect the amounts that would result if
the customer had individually licensed each specific software
solution at the outset of the arrangement.
Services and other revenue has remained relatively consistent
during each of the three month periods shown in the above table.
The increase in Services and other revenue as a percentage of
total revenue is primarily due to the decrease in product
revenue during the three months ended September 27, 2008.
Revenue
by Geography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
91.0
|
|
|
$
|
160.9
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)%
|
|
$
|
339.8
|
|
|
$
|
523.2
|
|
|
|
(35)%
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
52.3
|
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
|
|
180.4
|
|
|
|
220.1
|
|
|
|
(18)%
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)%
|
|
|
162.9
|
|
|
|
242.4
|
|
|
|
(33)%
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
102.4
|
|
|
|
149.5
|
|
|
|
(32)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
232.5
|
|
|
$
|
400.9
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)%
|
|
$
|
811.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,157.1
|
|
|
|
(30)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Revenue
by Geography as a Percent of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
|
45%
|
|
Other Americas
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rate of revenue change varies geographically primarily due
to differences in the timing and size of term licenses in those
regions. No one customer accounted for 10% or more of total
revenue for the three months ended September 27, 2008 and
one customer accounted for 14% of total revenue for the three
months ended September 29, 2007. No one customer accounted
for 10% or more of total revenue for the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and for the nine months ended
September 29, 2007.
Most of our revenue is transacted in the United States dollar.
However, certain revenue transactions are in foreign currencies,
primarily the Japanese yen, and we recognize additional revenue
in periods when the United States dollar weakens in value
against the Japanese yen. For additional description of how
changes in foreign exchange rates affect our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, see the discussion under the
heading Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk Disclosures About
Market Risk Foreign Currency Risk below.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense Summary
Stock-based compensation expense is reflected throughout our
costs and expenses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cost of product
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
----
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
$
|
57.7
|
|
|
$
|
78.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008,
stock-based compensation expense decreased $9.5 million, as
compared to the three months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $7.1 million in stock-based compensation
expense for restricted stock and stock bonuses, primarily due to
the reversal of $6.5 million of stock-based compensation
expense related to the modification of certain performance-based
restricted stock awards; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.2 million in stock-based compensation
expense for stock options, primarily due to our increased use of
restricted stock instead of stock options in recent years;
partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $0.8 million in stock-based compensation
expense primarily due to an increase in purchase rights granted
under our ESPP during the current period.
|
30
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008,
stock-based compensation expense decreased $21.1 million,
as compared to the nine months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $14.5 million in stock-based compensation
expense for restricted stock and stock bonuses, primarily due to
the reversal of $6.5 million of stock-based compensation
expense related to the modification of certain performance-based
restricted stock awards, new grants of restricted stock being
valued at a lower stock price and a decrease in stock
bonuses; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $9.1 million in stock-based compensation
expense for stock options, primarily due to our increased use of
restricted stock instead of stock options in recent years;
partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $2.5 million in stock-based compensation
expense primarily due to an increase in purchase rights granted
under our ESPP during the current period.
|
We expect an increase in stock-based compensation for the three
months ending January 3, 2009, primarily due to the
acceleration of options for certain executives who resigned in
October 2008.
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
(14)%
|
|
$
|
39.2
|
|
|
$
|
42.3
|
|
|
(7)%
|
Services
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
10%
|
|
$
|
78.1
|
|
|
$
|
70.4
|
|
|
11%
|
Maintenance
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
|
(9)%
|
|
$
|
42.9
|
|
|
$
|
45.6
|
|
|
(6)%
|
Cost
of Revenue as a Percent of Related Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
Services
|
|
|
78%
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
79%
|
|
|
|
73%
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Cost of product includes costs associated with the sale or lease
of our hardware and licensing of our software products. Cost of
product primarily includes the cost of employee salary, benefits
and other employee-related costs, including stock-based
compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangibles
directly related to our products, the cost of technical
documentation and royalties payable to third party vendors. Cost
of product associated with our hardware products also includes
materials, assembly and overhead. These additional manufacturing
costs make our cost of hardware product higher, as a percentage
of revenue, than our cost of software product.
A summary of Cost of product is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Product related costs
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
25.5
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of product
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
$
|
39.2
|
|
|
$
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, Cost of
product decreased $2.0 million, as compared to the three
months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to a
decrease of $1.9 million in amortization of acquired
intangible assets because certain acquired intangibles became
fully amortized during the period.
31
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, Cost of
product decreased $3.1 million, as compared to the nine
months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.3 million in amortization of acquired
intangible assets because certain acquired intangible assets
became fully amortized during the period; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.5 million in amortization of license costs
related to third party technology; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $3.2 million in hardware costs attributable
primarily to increased hardware sales during the first half of
2008.
|
Cost of product depends primarily upon the extent to which we
acquire intangible assets, acquire licenses and incorporate
third party technology in our products that are licensed or sold
in any given period, and the actual mix of hardware and software
product sales in any given period.
Cost of services primarily includes employee salary, benefits
and other employee-related costs, costs to maintain the
infrastructure necessary to manage a services organization, and
provisions for contract losses, if any. During the three months
ended September 27, 2008, Cost of services increased
$2.3 million, as compared to the three months ended
September 29, 2007, primarily due to an increase of
$1.0 million in salary, benefits and other employee-related
costs.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, Cost of
services increased $7.7 million, as compared to the nine
months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $2.8 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs;
|
|
|
An increase of $2.7 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs; and
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 29, 2007 we
recognized a gain of $0.9 million on the sale of land and
buildings that related to and accordingly reduced the overall
Cost of services for that period. There was no similar reduction
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008.
|
Cost of maintenance includes the cost of customer services, such
as hot-line and
on-site
support, employee salary, benefits and other employee-related
costs, and documentation of maintenance updates. During the
three months ended September 27, 2008, Cost of maintenance
decreased $1.3 million, as compared to the three months
ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to a decrease of
$1.4 million in salary, benefits and other employee-related
costs. During the nine months ended September 27, 2008,
Cost of maintenance decreased $2.7 million, as compared to
the nine months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to
a decrease in salary, benefits and other employee-related costs.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
$
|
91.1
|
|
|
$
|
97.2
|
|
|
(6)%
|
|
$
|
274.0
|
|
|
$
|
297.9
|
|
|
(8)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
112.5
|
|
|
|
125.4
|
|
|
(10)%
|
|
|
357.9
|
|
|
|
365.4
|
|
|
(2)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
40.7
|
|
|
(19)%
|
|
|
105.6
|
|
|
|
123.2
|
|
|
(14)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
236.5
|
|
|
$
|
263.3
|
|
|
(10)%
|
|
$
|
737.5
|
|
|
$
|
786.5
|
|
|
(6)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Operating
Expenses as a Percent of Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Marketing and sales
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
26%
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
48%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
44%
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Operating
Expense Summary
Operating expenses decreased $26.8 million during the three
months ended September 27, 2008, as compared to the three
months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $17.6 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $9.8 million in stock-based
compensation; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.2 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $2.3 in legal and other professional service
costs.
|
Operating expenses decreased $49.0 million during the nine
months ended September 27, 2008, as compared to the nine
months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $31.3 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $21.7 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $6.9 million in travel and customer
conference costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.4 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $8.8 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs; and
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 29, 2007, we
recognized a gain of $7.9 million on the sale of land and
buildings that related to and accordingly reduced Operating
expenses for that period. There was no similar reduction during
the nine months ended September 27, 2008.
|
In January 2007, we completed the sale of certain land and
buildings in San Jose, California for a sales price of
$46.5 million in cash. Concurrently with the sale, we
leased back from the purchaser approximately 262,500 square
feet of office space, which represents all available space in
the buildings. A substantial portion of the gain upon sale
offset our costs and expenses during the three months ended
March 31, 2007, and the remaining gain will be amortized
over the remaining initial lease term.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily due
to the decrease in the valuation of the United States dollar
when compared to the European Union euro and the Japanese yen,
increased operating expenses by $2.2 million in the three
months ended September 27, 2008, as compared to the three
months ended September 29, 2007, and increased operating
expenses by $12.0 million in the nine months ended
September 27, 2008, as compared to the nine months ended
September 29, 2007.
Marketing
and Sales
Marketing and sales expense decreased $6.1 million during
the three months ended September 27, 2008, as compared to
the three months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $7.6 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.6 million in stock-based
compensation; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.2 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $1.4 million in professional services
costs; and
|
|
|
An increase of $1.0 million in other marketing activities.
|
33
Marketing and sales expense decreased $23.9 million during
the nine months ended September 27, 2008, as compared to
the nine months ended September 29, 2007, primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $22.3 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.0 million in travel and customer
conference costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.6 million in stock-based compensation;
partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $1.4 million in professional services costs;
|
|
|
An increase of $1.3 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs; and
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 29, 2007, we
recognized a gain of $2.8 million on the sale of land and
buildings that related to and accordingly reduced Marketing and
sales expense for that period. There was no similar reduction
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008.
|
Research
and Development
Research and development expense decreased $12.9 million
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the three months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $8.4 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.3 million in professional services
costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.2 million in stock-based compensation.
|
Research and development expense decreased $7.5 million
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the nine months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $8.6 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.5 million in professional services costs;
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.2 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $2.1 million in travel costs; partially
offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $5.4 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs; and
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 29, 2007, we
recognized a gain of $4.7 million on the sale of land and
buildings that related to and accordingly reduced Research and
development expense for that period. There was no similar
reduction during the nine months ended September 27, 2008.
|
General
and Administrative
General and administrative expense decreased $7.8 million
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the three months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $6.0 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.2 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.5 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $3.2 million in legal and other professional
services costs primarily related to our proposed acquisition of
all of the outstanding shares of Mentor Graphics common stock,
which we withdrew during the three months ended
September 27, 2008; and
|
|
|
An increase of $1.4 million in facilities and other
infrastructure costs.
|
General and administrative expense decreased $17.6 million
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the nine months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $8.5 million in stock-based compensation;
|
|
|
A decrease of $5.4 million in losses on the sale of
installment contract receivables;
|
|
|
A decrease of $4.8 million in salary, benefits and other
employee-related costs; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $3.0 million in depreciation, computer
equipment lease costs and maintenance costs associated with
third party software; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $2.1 million in facilities and
infrastructure costs;
|
|
|
An increase of $1.3 million in legal and other professional
services costs; and
|
|
|
And increase of $1.0 million in bad debt expense.
|
34
Amortization
of Acquired Intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles increased $0.9 million
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the three months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $1.5 million of amortization for intangibles
acquired in 2007 and 2008; partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $0.6 million of amortization for intangible
assets from prior year acquisitions that became fully amortized
during 2007 and 2008.
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles increased $3.5 million
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008, as
compared to the nine months ended September 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $4.9 million of amortization for intangibles
acquired in 2007 and 2008; partially offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $1.4 million of amortization for intangible
assets from prior year acquisitions that became fully amortized
during 2007 and 2008.
|
Restructuring
and Other Charges
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, we
determined that we would initiate a plan of restructuring
intended to decrease costs by reducing our workforce throughout
the company, and that the expenses associated with that
reduction were both probable and estimable. We recorded
Restructuring and other charges of approximately
$48.1 million during the three months ended
September 27, 2008 that included estimated severance
payments, severance-related benefits and costs for outplacement
services for at least 625 employees. We expect to record an
additional $17.0 million to $22.0 million in
restructuring costs during the three months ending
January 3, 2009 related to other aspects of this
restructuring that were not probable as of September 27,
2008, or that should be recorded as the expense is incurred. We
expect ongoing annual savings of at least $150.0 million
related to this plan of restructuring.
As of September 27, 2008, we had not made any payments in
connection with this restructuring plan and the entire
$48.1 million is included in Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Due to
varying regulations in the jurisdictions and countries in which
we operate, we expect substantially all termination benefits to
be paid by January 2, 2010.
In connection with this restructuring initiative, we have
recorded estimated provisions for termination benefits and
outplacement costs. We regularly evaluate the adequacy of our
restructuring accrual, and adjust the balance based on changes
in estimates and assumptions. We may incur future charges for
changes in estimates related to amounts previously recorded and
for additional activities under this restructuring.
Because the restructuring charges and related benefits are
derived from managements estimates made during the
formulation of the restructurings, based on then-currently
available information, our restructuring activities may not
achieve the benefits anticipated on the timetable or at the
level contemplated. Demand for our products and services and,
ultimately, our future financial performance, is difficult to
predict with any degree of certainty. Accordingly, additional
actions, including further restructuring of our operations, may
be required in the future.
Write-off
of Acquired In-process Technology
In connection with the acquisition completed during the nine
months ended September 27, 2008, we immediately charged to
expense $0.6 million representing certain acquired
in-process technologies that had not yet reached technological
feasibility and had no alternative future use. The value
assigned to acquired in-process technology was determined by
identifying research projects in areas for which technological
feasibility had not been established. The value was determined
by estimating costs to develop the various acquired in-process
technologies into commercially viable products, estimating the
resulting net cash flows from such projects and
35
discounting the net cash flows back to their present value. The
discount rate assumed in these calculations was 22% and included
factors that reflect the uncertainty surrounding successful
development of the acquired in-process technology. The
in-process technologies became commercially viable in June 2008
at a cost of approximately $0.2 million, but will require
further research and development even though the technologies
have reached a state of technological and commercial feasibility.
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
During the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008
and September 29, 2007, the primary component of interest
expense was the Convertible Senior Notes. The increase in
interest expense for the three months ended September 27,
2008, as compared to the three months ended September 29,
2007, was primarily due to the 0.25% premium paid upon
redemption of the majority of our 2023 Notes. The decrease in
interest expense for the nine months ended September 27,
2008, as compared to the nine months ended September 29,
2007, was primarily due to the repayment in full of our Term
Loan during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Other
Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net, for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
12.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
37.5
|
|
Gains on sale of non-marketable securities
|
|
|
----
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Gains (losses) on sale of non-marketable and trading securities
in Cadences non-qualified deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Gains (losses) on foreign exchange
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Equity losses from investments
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
Write-down of investments
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
$
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
$
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased $8.6 million and
$19.7 million for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008, respectively, as compared to the three
and nine months ended September 29, 2007. The decrease was
due to lower average cash balances and lower interest rates
during the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008.
During the three and nine months ended September 27, 2008,
we determined that one of our available-for-sale securities was
other-than-temporarily impaired based on the severity and the
duration of the impairment, and we wrote down the investment by
$2.4 million and $7.8 million, respectively.
36
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, we
purchased approximately 4.3 million shares of Mentor
Graphics common stock in connection with our proposed
acquisition of Mentor Graphics. Subsequent to the announcement
of our withdrawal of the proposed acquisition of Mentor Graphics
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, we sold
our entire equity interest in Mentor Graphics at a loss of
$9.4 million.
Income
Taxes
The following table presents the provision for income taxes and
the effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 and September 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
49.0
|
|
|
$
|
23.5
|
|
|
$
|
50.3
|
|
|
$
|
67.3
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(40.8)%
|
|
|
|
24.4%
|
|
|
|
(30.5)%
|
|
|
|
27.6%
|
|
Because of the widespread problems in global capital markets
during the three months ended September 27, 2008, we
decided to repatriate $200.0 million of earnings from a
foreign subsidiary, earnings which had previously been
considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United
States and for which deferred taxes had not been previously
provided. We currently expect that an additional
$117.9 million of previously untaxed earnings from foreign
subsidiaries will not be indefinitely reinvested outside of the
United States. As a result, we have accrued a tax expense of
$71.0 million during the three and nine months ended
September 27, 2008 to provide for the potential U.S., state
and foreign income taxes on these repatriations. We intend to
indefinitely reinvest the remainder of undistributed earnings of
our foreign subsidiaries, which we estimate to be
$29.0 million for the year ending January 3, 2009 to
meet both the working capital and long-term capital needs of our
subsidiaries and of Cadence.
Our negative effective tax rate for the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008 primarily reflects the
period-specific tax expense of $71.0 million related to our
repatriations of foreign earnings which is partially offset by
the tax benefit of losses in certain tax jurisdictions. Our
effective tax rates were negative for the three and nine months
ended September 27, 2008 as compared to the positive
effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended
September 29, 2007, primarily due to the Loss before
provision for income taxes and the period-specific tax expense
of $71.0 million related to our repatriations of foreign
earnings for the three and nine months ended September 27,
2008.
We expect to recognize a pre-tax loss for the year and we
estimate our annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year
ending January 3, 2009 to be approximately (15.0)%. We
anticipate having a negative effective tax rate primarily as a
result of the tax expense on our repatriations of foreign
earnings, tax expense of our foreign subsidiaries and interest
expense on our unrecognized tax benefits, which will be
partially offset by the tax benefit of losses recognized in
certain tax jurisdictions. Subsequent to our quarter ended
September 27, 2008, the U.S. federal research tax
credit was enacted retroactively to January 1, 2008 for a
period of two years. We currently estimate that the
reinstatement of the federal research tax credit will provide an
incremental effective tax rate benefit of approximately 2.0% for
the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009. Our effective tax
rate for the year ended December 29, 2007 was 18.6%.
During the nine months ended September 27, 2008, we
recognized a $7.9 million decrease in the net liabilities
for unrecognized tax benefits based on new information received
during the period, which we accounted for as a $7.9 million
increase in the balance of Common stock and capital in excess of
par value.
The IRS and other tax authorities regularly examine our income
tax returns. In July 2006, the IRS completed its field
examination of our federal income tax returns for the tax years
2000 through 2002 and issued a Revenue Agents Report, or
RAR, in which the IRS proposed to assess an aggregate tax
deficiency for the three-year period of approximately
$324.0 million. In November 2006, the IRS revised the
proposed aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year period to
be approximately $318.0 million. The IRS is contesting our
qualification for deferred recognition of certain proceeds
received from restitution and settlement in connection with
litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency for
this item is approximately $152.0 million. The remaining
proposed tax
37
deficiency of approximately $166.0 million is primarily
related to proposed adjustments to our transfer pricing
arrangements with our foreign subsidiaries and to our deductions
for foreign trade income. The IRS may make similar claims
against our transfer pricing arrangements and deductions for
foreign trade income in future examinations. We have filed a
timely protest with the IRS and will seek resolution of the
issues with the Appeals Office of the IRS, or the Appeals Office.
We believe that the proposed IRS adjustments are inconsistent
with applicable tax laws and we are vigorously challenging these
proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final Statutory Notice of
Deficiency but the IRS imposes interest on the proposed
deficiencies until the matters are resolved. Interest is
compounded daily at rates that are published and adjusted
quarterly by the IRS and have been between 4% and 10% since
2001. The IRS is currently examining our federal income tax
returns for the tax years 2003 through 2005.
We believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amounts
of unrecognized tax benefits for our transfer pricing
arrangements with our foreign subsidiaries could significantly
increase or decrease during the fiscal year ending
January 3, 2009 if the Appeals Office develops new
settlement guidelines that change our measurement of the tax
benefits to be recognized upon effective settlement with the
IRS. Because of the uncertain impact of any potential settlement
guidelines, we cannot currently provide an estimate of the range
of the reasonably possible change.
We also believe that it is reasonably possible that the total
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits related to the value of
stock options included in our cost sharing arrangements with our
foreign subsidiaries could significantly increase or decrease
during the fiscal year ending January 3, 2009 based on the
outcome of the IRS appeal of Xilinx, Inc. v. Commissioner,
which is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit. We believe that the range of reasonably possible change
is an increase in unrecognized tax benefits of $6.4 million
to a decrease of unrecognized tax benefit of $1.6 million.
Significant judgment is required in applying the principles of
FIN No. 48 and SFAS No. 109. The calculation
of our provision for income taxes involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and
regulations. In determining the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes, we regularly assess the potential settlement
outcomes resulting from income tax examinations. However, the
final outcome of tax examinations, including the total amount
payable or the timing of any such payments upon resolution of
these issues, cannot be estimated with certainty. In addition,
we cannot be certain that such amount will not be materially
different than that which is reflected in our historical income
tax provisions and accruals. Should the IRS or other tax
authorities assess additional taxes as a result of a current or
a future examination, we may be required to record charges to
operations in future periods that could have a material impact
on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows
in the applicable period or periods.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
557.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,078.1
|
|
Net working capital
|
|
|
441.0
|
|
|
|
744.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 27,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
37.7
|
|
|
$
|
208.9
|
|
Cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(112.4
|
)
|
|
|
(75.4
|
)
|
Cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(441.3
|
)
|
|
|
(133.9
|
)
|
38
Cash
and cash equivalents and Short-term investments
As of September 27, 2008, our principal sources of
liquidity consisted of $557.8 million of Cash and cash
equivalents and Short-term investments, as compared to
$1,078.1 million as of December 29, 2007.
Our primary sources of cash in the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer payments under software licenses and from the sale or
lease of our hardware products;
|
|
|
Customer payments for design and methodology services;
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of receivables; and
|
|
|
Cash received for common stock purchases under our employee
stock purchase plan.
|
Our primary uses of cash in the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Payments relating to payroll, product, services and other
operating expenses;
|
|
|
Principal payments of the 2023 Notes;
|
|
|
Payments to former shareholders of acquired businesses;
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment; and
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock as part of our stock repurchase
program.
|
Net
working capital
Net working capital decreased $303.1 million as of
September 27, 2008, as compared to December 29, 2007,
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $511.2 million in Cash and cash
equivalents; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $47.8 million in Receivables, net; partially
offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $230.4 million in Convertible notes;
|
|
|
A decrease of $30.9 million in Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $19.3 million in Current portion of deferred
revenue.
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities include net income
(loss), adjusted for certain non-cash charges, as well as
changes in the balances of certain assets and liabilities. Our
cash flows from operating activities are significantly
influenced by the payment terms set forth in our license
agreements and by sales of our receivables. As a result of
challenges currently affecting the economy of the United States
and other parts of the world, our customers may experience
adverse changes in their business and as a result, may delay or
default their payment obligations. If our customers are not
successful in generating sufficient revenue or are precluded
from securing financing, they may not be able to pay, or may
delay payment of, accounts receivable that are owed to us,
although these obligations are generally not cancelable. Our
customers inability to fulfill payment obligations may
adversely affect our cash flow. Additionally, our customers may
seek to renegotiate pre-existing contractual commitments. Though
we have not, to date, experienced a material level of defaults,
any material payment default by our customers or significant
reductions in existing contractual commitments would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating
results.
We have entered into agreements whereby we may transfer accounts
receivable to certain financing institutions on a non-recourse
or limited-recourse basis. These transfers are recorded as sales
and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. During the nine months
ended September 27, 2008, we transferred accounts
receivable, net of the losses on the sale of the receivables,
totaling $48.1 million, which approximated fair value, to
financing institutions on a non-recourse basis, as compared to
$163.5 million for the nine months ended September 29,
2007. As a result of the credit losses recorded by banks over
the last twelve months and the current financial crisis
experienced by banks, a number of banks have become less willing
to purchase assets because of capital constraints and concerns
about over-exposure to the technology sector. In addition, due
to the change in the license mix that will result in an
increased number of subscription licenses that cannot be
transferred to financing institutions, we expect a reduced level
of Proceeds from the sale of receivables throughout the
remainder of 2008. Due to the lower order levels and
39
the reduced level of sale of receivables, we expect Cash flows
from operating activities to be approximately $75.0 million
for fiscal 2008, if financial institutions will continue to
acquire qualifying accounts receivable assets at the levels we
currently expect.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $37.7 million
for the nine months ended September 27, 2008 was primarily
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
A decrease of $115.8 million in Receivables, net and
Installment contract receivables, net of sales of receivables,
due to the payment terms set forth in our license
agreements; and
|
|
|
An increase of $36.0 million in Other long-term
liabilities; partially offset by
|
|
|
Net loss, net of non-cash related expenses, of
$40.4 million;
|
|
|
A decrease of $32.2 million in cash received for deferred
revenue; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $41.6 million in Accounts payable and other
accrued liabilities.
|
Net cash provided by operating activities of $208.9 million
for the nine months ended September 29, 2007 was primarily
comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, net of non-cash related expenses, of
$343.2 million; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $100.7 million in Receivables, net and
Installment contract receivables, net of sales of receivables,
due to the payment terms set forth in our license agreements;
|
|
|
A decrease of $35.5 million in Accounts payable and other
accrued liabilities; and
|
|
|
An increase of $23.2 million in Prepaid expenses and other.
|
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, we
determined that we would initiate a plan of restructuring
intended to decrease costs by reducing our workforce throughout
the company by at least 625 employees. Because the restructuring
was probable and the costs were estimable during the three
months ended September 27, 2008, we recorded restructuring
and other charges of $48.1 million during that period. We
expect to incur an additional $17.0 million to
$22.0 million of restructuring and other charges during the
three months ended January 3, 2008. As of
September 27, 2008, we had not made any payments in
connection with this restructuring plan. We expect to make
payments of approximately $22.0 million during the three
months ended January 3, 2009 and we expect substantially
all termination benefits to be paid by January 2, 2010. We
expect ongoing annual savings of at least $150.0 million
related to this plan of restructuring.
Cash
flows from investing activities
Our primary investing activities consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and proceeds from the sale of property, plant and
equipment;
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities;
|
|
|
Cash paid in business combinations and asset acquisitions, net
of cash acquired, and acquisition of intangibles; and
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities and
long-term investments.
|
Net cash used for investing activities was $112.4 million
for the nine months ended September 27, 2008, as compared
to $75.4 million for the nine months ended
September 29, 2007. The change was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $62.4 million in Purchases of
available-for-sale securities;
|
|
|
An increase of $23.7 million of Purchases of property,
plant and equipment, including payments associated with our
construction of a new building on our San Jose
campus; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $46.5 million of Proceeds from the sale of
property, plant and equipment; partially offset by
|
|
|
An increase of $47.3 million of Proceeds from the sale of
available-for-sale securities.
|
In January 2007, we completed the sale of certain land and
buildings in San Jose, California for a sales price of
$46.5 million in cash. Concurrently with the sale, we
leased back from the purchaser all available space in the
buildings. During the lease term, we are constructing an
additional building located on our San Jose, California
campus to replace the buildings we sold in this transaction. We
expect to use approximately $9.2 million in cash during the
remainder of fiscal 2008 for construction of this new building.
We expect to continue our investing
40
activities, including purchasing property, plant and equipment,
purchasing intangible assets, purchasing software licenses and
making long-term equity investments.
In connection with our acquisitions completed prior to
September 27, 2008, we may be obligated to pay up to an
aggregate of $57.5 million in cash during the next
47 months if certain defined performance goals are achieved
in full. Of this amount, up to $48.5 million would be
expensed as compensation expense in our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations and up to $9.0 million would be
added to the purchase price of the acquisitions and will be
recorded in Goodwill in our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Cash
flows from financing activities
Financing cash flows during the nine months ended
September 27, 2008 consisted primarily of the issuance of
common stock under certain employee plans, purchases of treasury
stock and the repurchase of our Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior
Convertible Notes Due 2023, or the 2023 Notes, upon the election
of the holders of the 2023 Notes and pursuant to the terms of
the 2023 Notes.
Net cash used for financing activities increased by
$307.5 million during the nine months ended
September 27, 2008, as compared to the nine months ended
September 29, 2007. The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $230.2 million in principal payments of our
2023 Notes; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $200.9 million in Proceeds from the sale of
common stock due to a decreased number of options exercised
during the nine months ended September 27, 2008; partially
offset by
|
|
|
A decrease of $98.5 million in Purchases of treasury
stock; and
|
|
|
A decrease of $28.0 million of payments on our Term Loan,
the repayment of which was completed in March 2007; and
|
|
|
An increase of $18.0 million in Proceeds from receivable
sale financing.
|
We record a gain or loss on re-issuance of treasury stock based
on the total proceeds received in the transaction. During the
nine months ended September 27, 2008, we recorded losses on
the re-issuance of treasury stock of $79.1 million as a
component of Retained earnings.
As of September 27, 2008, we have $854.4 million
remaining under our stock repurchase programs as authorized by
our Board of Directors.
Other
factors affecting liquidity and capital resources
Income Taxes
During the three months ended September 27, 2008, we
repatriated $200.0 million of earnings from a foreign
subsidiary, earnings which had previously been considered to be
indefinitely reinvested outside the United States and for which
deferred taxes had not been previously provided. We currently
expect to repatriate an additional $117.9 million of
previously untaxed earnings from foreign subsidiaries in future
periods. We expect that our available net operating losses and
foreign tax credits will offset any current year income taxes
related to the dividends to be paid during fiscal 2008. We
intend to indefinitely reinvest the remainder of our
undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries which we
estimate to be approximately $29.0 million for the year
ending January 3, 2009, to meet both the working capital
and long-term capital needs of its subsidiaries and of Cadence.
The IRS and other tax authorities regularly examine our income
tax returns. In July 2006, the IRS completed its field
examination of our federal income tax returns for the tax years
2000 through 2002 and issued an RAR in which the IRS proposed to
assess an aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year period of
approximately $324.0 million. In November 2006, the IRS
revised the proposed aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year
period to be approximately $318.0 million. The IRS is
contesting our qualification for deferred recognition of certain
proceeds received from restitution and settlement in connection
with litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency
for this item is approximately $152.0 million. The
remaining proposed tax deficiency of approximately
$166.0 million is primarily related to proposed adjustments
to our transfer pricing arrangements with our foreign
subsidiaries and to our deductions for foreign trade income. The
IRS may make similar claims against our transfer pricing
arrangements and deductions for foreign trade income in future
examinations. We have filed a timely protest with the IRS and
will seek resolution of the issues with the Appeals Office.
41
We believe that the proposed IRS adjustments are inconsistent
with applicable tax laws and we are vigorously challenging these
proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final Statutory Notice of
Deficiency but the IRS imposes interest on the proposed
deficiencies until the matters are resolved. Interest is
compounded daily at rates published and adjusted quarterly by
the IRS and have been between 4% and 10% since 2001. The IRS is
currently examining our federal income tax returns for the tax
years 2003 through 2005.
1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011 and
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013
In December 2006, we issued $250.0 million principal amount
of 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011, or the 2011
Notes, and $250.0 million principal amount of
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013, or the 2013
Notes, and collectively, the Convertible Senior Notes, to three
initial purchasers in a private placement pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
Securities Act, for resale to qualified institutional buyers
pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act. We received
net proceeds of approximately $487.0 million after
transaction fees of approximately $13.0 million, including
$12.0 million of underwriting discounts. A portion of the
net proceeds totaling $228.5 million was used to purchase
$189.6 million principal amount of our 2023 Notes.
Holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes prior to
maturity upon the occurrence of one of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of our common stock reaches $27.50 during certain
periods of time specified in the Convertible Senior Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes falls below a
certain threshold.
|
On and after November 2, 2011, in the case of the 2011
Notes, and November 1, 2013, in the case of the 2013 Notes,
until the close of business on the scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert
their Convertible Senior Notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. We may not redeem the Convertible
Senior Notes prior to maturity.
The initial conversion rate for the Convertible Senior Notes is
47.2813 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of Convertible Senior Notes, equivalent to a conversion
price of approximately $21.15 per share of our common stock.
Upon conversion, a holder will receive the sum of the daily
settlement amounts, calculated on a proportionate basis for each
day, during a specified observation period following the
conversion date. The daily settlement amount during each date of
the observation period consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash up to the principal amount of the note; and
|
|
|
Our common stock to the extent that the conversion value exceeds
the amount of cash paid upon conversion of the Convertible
Senior Notes.
|
In addition, if a fundamental change occurs prior to maturity
and provided that our stock price is greater than $18.00 per
share, the conversion rate will increase by an additional amount
of up to $8.27 per share, for a holder that elects to convert
its Convertible Senior Notes in connection with such fundamental
change, which amount will be paid entirely in cash. A
fundamental change is any transaction or event (whether by means
of an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer, consolidation,
merger, combination, reclassification, recapitalization or
otherwise) in which more than 50% of our common stock is
exchanged for, converted into, acquired for or constitutes
solely the right to receive, consideration. No fundamental
change will have occurred if at least 90% of the consideration
received consists of shares of common stock, or depositary
receipts representing such shares, that are:
|
|
|
|
|
Listed on, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
listed on, a United States national securities exchange; or
|
|
|
Approved, or immediately after the transaction or event will be
approved, for quotation on a United States system of automated
dissemination of quotations of securities prices similar to the
NASDAQ National Market prior to its designation as a national
securities exchange.
|
As of September 27, 2008, none of the conditions allowing
the holders of the Convertible Senior Notes to convert had been
met.
Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes began accruing in
December 2006 and is payable semi-annually each
December 15th and June 15th.
42
Concurrently with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes,
we entered into hedge transactions with various parties whereby
we have the option to purchase up to 23.6 million shares of
our common stock at a price of $21.15 per share, subject to
adjustment. These options expire on December 15, 2011, in
the case of the 2011 Notes, and December 15, 2013, in the
case of the 2013 Notes, and must be settled in net shares. The
aggregate cost of these hedge transactions was
$119.8 million and has been recorded as a reduction to
Stockholders equity in accordance with EITF
No. 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own
Stock. The estimated fair value of the hedges acquired in
connection with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$11.7 million as of September 27, 2008. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of these hedges will not be recognized
as long as the instruments remain classified as equity.
In separate transactions, we also sold warrants to various
parties for the purchase of up to 23.6 million shares of
our common stock at a price of $31.50 per share in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
The warrants expire on various dates from February 2012 through
April 2012 in the case of the 2011 Notes, and February 2014
through April 2014 in the case of the 2013 Notes, and must be
settled in net shares. We received $39.4 million in cash
proceeds from the sale of these warrants, which has been
recorded as a reduction to Stockholders equity in
accordance with EITF
No. 00-19.
The estimated fair value of the warrants sold in connection with
the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was
$5.2 million as of September 27, 2008. Subsequent
changes in the fair value of these warrants will not be
recognized as long as the instruments remain classified as
equity. The warrants will be included in diluted earnings per
share, or EPS, to the extent the impact is dilutive.
Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior Convertible Notes Due 2023
In August 2003, we issued $420.0 million principal amount
of our 2023 Notes to two initial purchasers in a private
placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
for resale to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to
Rule 144A of the Securities Act. We received net proceeds
of $406.4 million after transaction fees of
$13.6 million that were recorded in Other long-term assets
and were being amortized to interest expense using the
straight-line method over five years. In connection with the
issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes in December 2006, we
repurchased $189.6 million principal amount of the 2023
Notes and in August 2008, we repurchased $230.2 million
principal amount of the 2023 Notes upon election of the holders
of the 2023 Notes and pursuant to the terms of the 2023 Notes,
for total consideration of $230.8 million, reducing the
outstanding 2023 Note balance to $0.2 million as of
September 27, 2008. Concurrently with the issuance of the
2023 Notes, we entered into hedge and warrant transactions, all
of which expired during the nine months ended September 27,
2008 and no settlement was required.
For further information about our 2023 Notes, including
conversion rights and the effect of a fundamental change, see
the discussion under the heading Liquidity and Capital
Resources Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and
Capital Resources in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007.
New
Accounting Standards
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position, or FSP, APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement), which will require us to recognize additional
non-cash interest expense related to our Convertible Senior
Notes in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
FSP APB 14-1
is effective for fiscal 2009 and is required to be applied
retrospectively for all periods for which our Convertible Senior
Notes were outstanding prior to the date of adoption. FSP APB
14-1 will
have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial
condition, particularly with respect to interest expense ratios
commonly referred to by lenders, and could potentially hinder
our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt or
equity securities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations and SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 141R will
change how business acquisitions are accounted for and will
impact financial statements both on the acquisition date and in
subsequent periods. SFAS No. 160 will change the
accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be
recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a
component of equity. SFAS No. 141R and
SFAS No. 160 are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is not permitted.
We are currently evaluating the impact that
SFAS No. 141R and SFAS No. 160 will have on
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Disclosures
About Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relates primarily to our portfolio of Cash and cash equivalents.
While we are exposed to interest rate fluctuations in many of
the worlds leading industrialized countries, our interest
income and expense is most sensitive to fluctuations in the
general level of United States interest rates. In this regard,
changes in United States interest rates affect the interest
earned on our Cash and cash equivalents and costs associated
with foreign currency hedges.
We invest in high quality credit issuers and, by policy, limit
the amount of our credit exposure to any one issuer. As part of
our policy, our first priority is to reduce the risk of
principal loss. Consequently, we seek to preserve our invested
funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment
risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in only high quality
credit securities that we believe to have low credit risk and by
positioning our portfolio to respond appropriately to a
significant reduction in a credit rating of any investment
issuer or guarantor. The short-term interest-bearing portfolio
of Cash and cash equivalents includes only marketable securities
with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio
liquidity.
All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash
equivalents. Investments with maturities greater than three
months are classified as available-for-sale and are considered
to be short-term investments. The carrying value of our
interest-bearing instruments approximated fair value as of
September 27, 2008. The following table presents the
carrying value and related weighted average interest rates for
our interest-bearing instruments, which are all classified as
Cash and cash equivalents on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of September 27, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents variable rate
|
|
$
|
425.4
|
|
|
|
2.11%
|
|
Cash variable rate
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
0.93%
|
|
Cash fixed rate
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
|
|
0.91%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing instruments
|
|
$
|
534.7
|
|
|
|
1.87%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
Currency Risk
Most of our revenue and material business activity are
transacted in the United States dollar. However, certain of our
operations include transactions in foreign currencies and,
therefore, we benefit from a weaker dollar, and in certain
countries where we invoice customers in the local currency, we
are adversely affected by a stronger dollar relative to major
currencies worldwide. The primary effect of foreign currency
transactions on our results of operations from a weakening
United States dollar is an increase in revenue offset by a
smaller increase in expenses. Conversely, the primary effect of
foreign currency transactions on our results of operations from
a strengthening United States dollar is a reduction in revenue
offset by a smaller reduction in expenses.
We enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts with
financial institutions to protect against currency exchange
risks associated with existing assets and liabilities. A foreign
currency forward exchange contract acts as a hedge by increasing
in value when underlying assets decrease in value or underlying
liabilities increase in value due to changes in foreign exchange
rates. Conversely, a foreign currency forward exchange contract
decreases in value when underlying assets increase in value or
underlying liabilities decrease in value due to changes in
foreign exchange rates. These forward contracts are not
designated as accounting hedges under SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, and, therefore, the unrealized gains and
losses are recognized in Other income (expense), net, in advance
of the actual foreign currency cash flows with the fair value of
these forward contracts being recorded as accrued liabilities or
other current assets.
44
Our policy governing hedges of foreign currency risk does not
allow us to use forward contracts for trading purposes. Our
forward contracts generally have maturities of 90 days or
less. The effectiveness of our hedging program depends on our
ability to estimate future asset and liability exposures. We
enter into currency forward exchange contracts based on
estimated future asset and liability exposures. Recognized gains
and losses with respect to our current hedging activities will
ultimately depend on how accurately we are able to match the
amount of currency forward exchange contracts with actual
underlying asset and liability exposures.
The following table provides information, as of
September 27, 2008, about our forward foreign currency
contracts. The information is provided in United States dollar
equivalent amounts. The table presents the notional amounts, at
contract exchange rates, and the weighted average contractual
foreign currency exchange rates expressed as units of the
foreign currency per United States dollar, which in some cases
may not be the market convention for quoting a particular
currency. All of these forward contracts mature prior to or
during November 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
$
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
107.18
|
|
British pound sterling
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
European union euro
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
Indian rupee
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
45.10
|
|
Israeli shekel
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
137.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While we actively monitor our foreign currency risks, there can
be no assurance that our foreign currency hedging activities
will substantially offset the impact of fluctuations in currency
exchange rates on our results of operations, cash flows and
financial position.
Equity
Price Risk
1.375% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2011 and
1.500% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2013
In December 2006, we issued $250.0 million principal amount
of our 2011 Notes, and $250.0 million principal amount of
our 2013 Notes, or collectively, the Convertible Senior Notes,
to three initial purchasers in a private placement pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for resale to qualified
institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A of the
Securities Act. Concurrently with the issuance of the
Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into hedge transactions
with various parties, and in separate transactions, sold
warrants for the purchase of our common stock to various parties
to reduce the potential dilution from the conversion of the
Convertible Senior Notes and to mitigate any negative effect
such conversion may have on the price of our common stock. For
additional description of the Convertible Senior Notes,
including the hedge and warrants transactions, see the
discussion under the heading Liquidity and Capital
Resources Other Factors Affecting Liquidity and
Capital Resources above.
Investments
We have a portfolio of equity investments that includes
marketable equity securities and non-marketable equity
securities. Our equity investments are made primarily in
connection with our strategic investment program. Under our
strategic investment program, from time to time, we make cash
investments in companies with technologies that are potentially
strategically important to us.
45
We consider all of our investments in marketable securities as
available-for-sale. It is our policy to review the fair value of
these marketable securities on a regular basis to determine
whether our investments in these companies are
other-than-temporarily impaired. This evaluation includes, but
is not limited to, reviewing each companys cash position,
financing needs, earnings or revenue outlook, operational
performance, management or ownership changes and competition. If
we believe the carrying value of an investment is in excess of
its fair value, and this difference is other-than-temporary, it
is our policy to write down the investment to reduce its
carrying value to fair value.
The fair value of our portfolio of available-for-sale marketable
equity securities, which are included in Short-term investments
on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, was
$3.1 million as of September 27, 2008 and
$14.9 million as of December 29, 2007. While we
actively monitor these investments, we do not currently engage
in any hedging activities to reduce or eliminate equity price
risk with respect to these equity investments. Accordingly, we
could lose all or part of our investment portfolio of marketable
equity securities if there is an adverse change in the market
prices of the companies we invest in.
Our investments in marketable and non-marketable equity
securities have recently been, and could continue to be
negatively affected by an adverse change in equity market
prices, although the impact on our investments in non-marketable
securities cannot be directly quantified. Such a change, or any
negative change in the financial performance or prospects of the
companies whose non-marketable securities we own, would harm the
ability of these companies to raise additional capital and the
likelihood of our being able to realize any gains or return of
our investments through liquidity events such as initial public
offerings, acquisitions and private sales. These types of
investments involve a high degree of risk, and there can be no
assurance that any company we invest in will grow or will be
successful or that we will be able to liquidate a particular
investment when desired. Accordingly, we could lose all or part
of our investment.
Our investments in non-marketable equity securities had a
carrying amount of $24.2 million as of September 27,
2008 and $26.2 million as of December 29, 2007. If we
determine that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value
exists for a non-marketable equity security, we write down the
investment to its fair value and record the related write-down
as an investment loss in our Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Consistent with good corporate governance practices, the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors, with the assistance of
special counsel and other advisors, conducted an investigation
of the events that led to restatement of our financial results
discussed in the Explanatory Note to this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
Upon the completion of this investigation, the Audit Committee
concluded that the circumstances that led to the restatement
were not the result of illegal conduct on the part of any of our
directors, officers, or other employees. We also carried out an
evaluation required by
Rule 13a-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our Chief of Staff of our Interim
Office of the Chief Executive, or IOCE Chief of Staff, and our
Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in
Rules 13-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of September 27, 2008.
As previously disclosed in this report and in our Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 20, 2008, our Chief Executive
Officer resigned on October 15, 2008, and in connection
with the resignation, our Board of Directors formed an Interim
Office of the Chief Executive, or the IOCE, to oversee the
day-to-day running of our operations. The members of the IOCE
are John B. Shoven, Ph.D., Chairman of our Board of
Directors, whose role as a member of the IOCE is to provide
oversight on behalf of our Board of Directors, Lip-Bu Tan,
Interim Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors, Charlie Huang,
our Senior Vice President, and Kevin S. Palatnik, our Senior
Vice President and CFO. Mr. Huang also holds the position
of IOCE Chief of Staff, and performs functions similar to a
principal executive officer.
The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
included a review of our processes and the effect on the
information generated for use in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
In the course of this evaluation, we sought
46
to identify any material weaknesses in our disclosure controls
and procedures, to determine whether we had identified any acts
of fraud involving personnel who have a significant role in our
disclosure controls and procedures, and to confirm that any
necessary corrective action, including process improvements, was
taken. This type of evaluation is done every fiscal quarter so
that our conclusions concerning the effectiveness of these
controls can be reported in our periodic reports filed with the
SEC. The overall goals of these evaluation activities are to
monitor our disclosure controls and procedures and to make
modifications as necessary. We intend to maintain these
disclosure controls and procedures, modifying them as
circumstances warrant.
In the course of the evaluation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, our management identified a material weakness in
internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness
is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting that creates a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or
interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis.
There was a material weakness in our internal controls over the
application of revenue recognition criteria required by
SOP 97-2
Software Revenue Recognition in the context of
multiple-element software arrangements.
The material weakness relates to both the insufficient design
and ineffective operation of certain internal controls over the
recognition of revenue from term license agreements.
Specifically, the material weakness is comprised of the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
Controls were not adequately designed to facilitate
communication of all information pertinent to the negotiations
with customers between the sales and sales finance organizations
and the personnel responsible for determining the appropriate
recognition of the revenue related to such license agreements.
As a result, controls relative to the sales and sales finance
organizations reviewing, analyzing and evaluating available
information pertinent to revenue recognition for term license
agreements were not operating effectively.
|
|
|
|
Controls were not adequately designed to detect or prevent the
inappropriate issuance of evaluation licenses to customers for
incubation technology. Incubation technology is not commercially
available for release.
|
As a result of the material weakness in internal control over
financial reporting, our management did not detect that revenue
from three term license arrangements was improperly recognized.
The correction of the revenue associated with these term license
agreements resulted in the following: (i) the restatement
of our previously issued condensed consolidated financial
statements for the three month period ended March 29, 2008;
(ii) the restatement of our previously issued condensed
consolidated financial statements for the three and six month
periods ended June 28, 2008; and (iii) adjustments to
the preliminary condensed consolidated financial statements for
the three and nine month periods ended September 27, 2008.
The restatements are more fully described in the Explanatory
Note to Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q/A
for the periods ended March 29, 2008 and June 28, 2008
and in Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements therein.
Based on the evaluation as of September 27, 2008, including
the identification of the material weakness, our IOCE Chief of
Staff and our CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as of September 27, 2008
to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in
our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including the
IOCE Chief of Staff and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Remediation
Steps to Address Material Weakness
To address the material weakness described above, we have
commenced the implementation of improvements to our internal
controls. Specifically, we have taken and are taking the
following actions, which our management
47
believes have improved, and will continue to improve, our
internal control over financial reporting, and our disclosure
controls and procedures:
|
|
|
|
|
Individuals who are part of the sales process will be required
to take enhanced comprehensive, ongoing compliance training
specific to our policies and procedures;
|
|
|
We will require additional analysis, communication, and
accompanying documentation from our sales and sales finance
organizations relating to recognition of revenue for term
license agreements, with particular emphasis on transactions
when factors are present that increase the risk that the
transaction could be deemed to be a subset of a multiple element
arrangement;
|
|
|
We will enhance our existing processes and controls with respect
to evaluation licenses that are applied to all technology being
evaluated by customers; and
|
|
|
We will make certain personnel changes and increase supervision
and training to effectuate the changes discussed above.
|
Our management believes that the actions described above will
remediate the material weakness we have identified and
strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. We
expect that the material weakness will be fully remediated prior
to January 3, 2009; however, there can be no assurance that
remediation will be completed by that date.
If we fail to remediate our material weakness promptly and
effectively, there is an increased risk that a material
misstatement in our interim or annual financial statement may
occur.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the quarter ended September 27, 2008 that
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting and Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, including the IOCE Chief of Staff and CFO, does
not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect
all error and all fraud. An internal control, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control
are met. Further, the design of an internal control must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of the control must be considered relative to their costs. While
our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance
of their effectiveness, because of the inherent limitations in
all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within Cadence have been detected.
48
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and
litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These include disputes and lawsuits related to
intellectual property, mergers and acquisitions, licensing,
contracts, distribution arrangements and employee relations
matters. At least quarterly, we review the status of each
significant matter and assess its potential financial exposure.
If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is
considered probable and the amount or the range of loss can be
estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss in
accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. Legal proceedings are subject to
uncertainties, and the outcomes are difficult to predict.
Because of such uncertainties, accruals are based only on the
best information available at the time. As additional
information becomes available, we reassess the potential
liability related to pending claims and litigation matters and
may revise estimates.
On May 30, 2007, Ahmed Higazi, a former employee, filed
suit against us in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California alleging that we improperly
classified him and a class of our other information technology
employees as exempt from overtime pay. The suit alleges claims
for unpaid overtime under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act
and California law, waiting-time penalties under the California
Labor Code, failure to provide proper earnings statements under
California law, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks
as required by California law, unfair business practices under
California Business & Professions Code
section 17200, and unpaid 401(k) Plan contributions in
violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. On
June 20, 2007, we answered the plaintiffs complaint,
denying its material allegations and raising a number of
affirmative defenses, and on December 19, 2007, we filed an
amended answer. A period of discovery conducted by both sides
then ensued, and was followed in January 2008 by a private
mediation of the case. At the mediation, the parties resolved
their respective differences, and entered into a settlement
agreement without contesting the merits of the claims or
admitting liability. On July 7, 2008, the court approved
the settlement agreement and we paid the settlement amount
shortly thereafter.
See also Note 16 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements regarding litigation filed subsequent to
September 27, 2008.
49
Our business faces many risks. Described below are what we
believe to be the material risks that we face. If any of the
events or circumstances described in the following risks
actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could suffer. The descriptions below include any
material changes to and supersede the description of the risk
factors as previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I
of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007, filed with the
SEC on February 26, 2008.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We are subject to the cyclical nature of the integrated
circuit and electronics systems industries, and any downturn in
these industries may reduce our revenue.
Purchases of our products and services are dependent upon the
commencement of new design projects by IC manufacturers and
electronics systems companies. The IC and electronics systems
industries are cyclical and are characterized by constant and
rapid technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price
erosion, evolving standards, short product life cycles and wide
fluctuations in product supply and demand.
The IC and electronics systems industries have experienced
significant downturns, often connected with, or in anticipation
of, maturing product cycles of both these industries and
their customers products and a decline in general economic
conditions. These downturns have been characterized by
diminished product demand, production overcapacity, high
inventory levels and accelerated erosion of average selling
prices. Any economic downturn in the industries we serve could
harm our business, operating results or financial condition.
Our failure to respond quickly to technological
developments could make our products uncompetitive and
obsolete.
The industries in which we compete experience rapid technology
developments, changes in industry standards, changes in customer
requirements and frequent new product introductions and
improvements. Currently, the industries we serve are
experiencing several revolutionary trends:
|
|
|
|
|
Migration to nanometer design: the size of features such as
wires, transistors and contacts on ICs continuously shrink due
to the ongoing advances in semiconductor manufacturing
processes. Process feature sizes refer to the width of the
transistors and the width and spacing of interconnect on the IC.
Feature size is normally identified by the transistor length,
which is shrinking rapidly to 65 nanometers and smaller. This is
commonly referred to in the semiconductor industry as the
migration to nanometer design. It represents a major challenge
for participants in the semiconductor industry, from IC design
and design automation to design of manufacturing equipment and
the manufacturing process itself. Shrinkage of transistor length
to such proportions is challenging the industry in the
application of more complex physics and chemistry that is needed
to realize advanced silicon devices. For EDA tools, models of
each components electrical properties and behavior become
more complex as do requisite analysis, design and verification
capabilities. Novel design tools and methodologies must be
invented quickly to remain competitive in the design of
electronics in the smallest nanometer ranges.
|
|
|
The challenges of nanometer design are leading some customers to
work with older, less risky manufacturing processes. This may
reduce their need to upgrade
and/or
proliferate their EDA products and design flows.
|
|
|
The ability to design SoCs, increases the complexity of managing
a design that, at the lowest level, is represented by billions
of shapes on the fabrication mask. In addition, SoCs typically
incorporate microprocessors and digital signal processors that
are programmed with software, requiring simultaneous design of
the IC and the related software embedded on the IC.
|
|
|
With the availability of seemingly endless gate capacity, there
is an increase in design reuse, or the combining of
off-the-shelf design IP with custom logic to create ICs. The
unavailability of high-quality design IP that can be reliably
incorporated into a customers design with our IC
implementation products and services could reduce demand for our
products and services.
|
|
|
Increased technological capability of the Field-Programmable
Gate Array, which is a programmable logic chip, creates an
alternative to IC implementation for some electronics companies.
This could reduce demand for our IC implementation products and
services.
|
|
|
A growing number of low-cost design and methodology services
businesses could reduce the need for some IC companies to invest
in EDA products.
|
50
If we are unable to respond quickly and successfully to these
developments, we may lose our competitive position, and our
products or technologies may become uncompetitive or obsolete.
To compete successfully, we must develop or acquire new products
and improve our existing products and processes on a schedule
that keeps pace with technological developments and the
requirements for products addressing a broad spectrum of
designers and designer expertise in our industries. We must also
be able to support a range of changing computer software,
hardware platforms and customer preferences. We cannot guarantee
that we will be successful in this effort.
We have experienced varied operating results, and our
operating results for any particular fiscal period are affected
by the timing of significant orders for our software products,
fluctuations in customer preferences for license types and the
timing of revenue recognition under those license types.
We have experienced, and may continue to experience, varied
operating results. In particular, we experienced a net loss for
the nine months ended September 27, 2008, we have
experienced net losses for some other past periods and we may
experience net losses in future periods. Various factors affect
our operating results and some of them are not within our
control. Our operating results for any period are affected by
the timing of significant orders for our software products
because a significant number of licenses for our software
products are in excess of $5.0 million.
Our operating results are also affected by the mix of license
types executed in any given period. We license software using
three different license types: subscription, term and perpetual.
Product revenue associated with term and perpetual licenses is
generally recognized at the beginning of the license period,
whereas product revenue associated with subscription licenses is
recognized over multiple periods during the term of the license.
Revenue may also be deferred under term and perpetual licenses
until payments become due and payable from customers with
nonlinear payment terms or as cash is collected from customers
with lower credit ratings. In addition, revenue is impacted by
the timing of license renewals, the extent to which contracts
contain flexible payment terms, changes in existing contractual
arrangements with customers and the mix of license types (i.e.,
perpetual, term or subscription) for existing customers, which
changes could have the effect of accelerating or delaying the
recognition of revenue from the timing of recognition under the
original contract. Our license mix has changed such that a
higher proportion of licenses require ratable revenue
recognition and will result in a decrease in our expected
revenue for the second half of fiscal year 2008 and for fiscal
year 2009.
We plan operating expense levels primarily based on forecasted
revenue levels. These expenses and the impact of long-term
commitments are relatively fixed in the short term. A shortfall
in revenue could lead to operating results below expectations
because we may not be able to quickly reduce these fixed
expenses in response to these short-term business changes.
The majority of our contracts are executed in the final two
weeks of a fiscal quarter. This makes it difficult to determine
with accuracy how much business will be executed in each fiscal
quarter. Due to the volume or complexity of transactions that we
review at the very end of the quarter, or due to operational
matters regarding particular agreements, we may not finish
processing or ship products under some contracts that have been
signed during that fiscal quarter, which means that the
associated revenue cannot be recognized in that particular
period.
You should not view our historical results of operations as
reliable indicators of our future performance. If revenue,
operating results or our business outlook for future periods
fall short of the levels expected by public market analysts or
investors, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Our stock price has been subject to fluctuations and has
experienced a significant decline, and may continue to be
subject to fluctuations and decline.
The market price of our common stock has recently experienced
significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate in the
future, and as a result you could lose the value of your
investment. The market price of our common stock may be affected
by a number of factors, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
Announcements of our quarterly operating results and revenue and
earnings forecasts that fail to meet or are inconsistent with
earlier projections or the expectations of our investors or
securities analysts;
|
|
|
Changes in our revenue and earnings estimates;
|
|
|
Announcements of a restructuring plan;
|
|
|
Changes in management;
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting charges relating to the impairment of goodwill;
|
|
|
A gain or loss of a significant customer;
|
|
|
Announcements of new products by us, our competitors or our
customers; and
|
|
|
Market conditions in the electronics systems and semiconductor
industries.
|
In addition, equity markets in general have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of many
technology companies have decreased substantially, particularly
electronic systems and semiconductor companies. Such price and
volume fluctuations may continue to adversely affect the market
price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to our business
or operating results.
Litigation arising in connection with the restatement of
our financial statements could adversely affect our financial
condition or operations.
As of December 9, 2008, we had three securities class
action lawsuits pending against us and current and former
members of management and two derivative lawsuits pending
against our current and former directors. The lawsuits are
described in Note 16 Subsequent Events in our
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The three securities class action complaints allege violations
of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, on behalf of a purported class of
purchasers of our common stock. The first such complaint was
filed on October 29, 2008, captioned Hu v. Cadence
Design Systems, Inc., Michael J. Fister, William Porter and
Kevin S. Palatnik; the second such complaint was filed on
November 4, 2008, captioned Vyas v. Cadence
Design Systems, Inc., Michael J. Fister, and Kevin S. Palatnik;
and the third such complaint was filed on November 21,
2008, captioned Collins v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.,
Michael J. Fister, John B. Shoven, Kevin S. Palatnik
and William Porter. We intend to vigorously defend these and any
other securities lawsuits that may be filed.
Two additional complaints purport to bring suit derivatively, on
behalf of our company, against certain of our current and former
directors for alleged breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of
control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and
unjust enrichment. Many of the allegations underlying these
claims are similar or identical to the allegations in the
securities class action lawsuits described above. The first such
complaint was filed on November 20, 2008, and captioned Ury
Priel, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Cadence
Design Systems, Inc. v. John B. Shoven, Lip-Bu Tan, Alberto
Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Donald L. Lucas, Sr., Roger
Siboni, George Scalise, Michael J. Fister, and Doe Defendants
1-15. The second such complaint was filed on December 1,
2008, and captioned Mark Levine, derivatively on behalf of
Nominal Defendant Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. John B.
Shoven, Lip-Bu Tan, Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Donald L.
Lucas, Sr., Roger Siboni, George Scalise, Michael J.
Fister, John Swaison and Doe Defendants 1-10. We are analyzing
these derivative complaints and will respond to them
appropriately.
In light of the preliminary status of these lawsuits, we cannot
predict the claims, allegations, class period (in the case of
the class actions), or outcome of these matters. In addition, we
cannot provide any assurances that the final outcome of these
lawsuits or any other proceedings that may arise in the future
will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, or financial condition. Litigation can be
time-consuming and expensive and could divert managements
time and attention from our business, which could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues and results of
operations. The adverse resolution of any specific lawsuit or
proceeding could also have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash
flows.
Matters relating to or arising from our recent restatement
and weaknesses in our internal controls could have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
In connection with the restatement of our financial statements
for the periods ended March 29, 2008 and June 28, 2008
and our reassessment of our disclosure controls and procedures
under Item 307 of
Regulation S-K,
management has concluded that as of March 29, 2008,
June 28, 2008 and September 27, 2008, our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective and that we had a
material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting. Please refer to Part I Item 4
of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for further discussion of the ineffectiveness of and material
weakness in our controls. Should we be unable to remediate such
material weakness promptly and effectively, it could harm our
operating results, result in a material misstatement of our
financial
52
statements, cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting
obligations or prevent us from providing reliable and accurate
financial reports or avoiding or detecting fraud. This, in turn,
could result in a loss of investor confidence in the accuracy
and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an
adverse effect on our stock price. Our restatement and related
litigation and other adverse publicity could have a material
adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Our operating results and revenue could be adversely
affected by customer payment delays and defaults or
modifications of licenses or supplier modifications in response
to the economic environment.
As a result of challenges currently affecting the economy of the
United States and other parts of the world, our customers may
experience adverse changes in their business and, as a result,
may delay or default on their payment obligations or modify or
cancel plans to license our products, and our suppliers may
significantly and quickly increase their prices or reduce their
output. If our customers are not successful in generating
sufficient revenue or are precluded from securing financing,
they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts
receivable that are owed to us, although these obligations are
generally not cancelable. Our customers inability to
fulfill payment obligations may adversely affect our revenue and
cash flow. Additionally, our customers may seek to renegotiate
pre-existing contractual commitments. Though we have not, to
date, experienced a material level of defaults, any material
payment default by our customers or significant reductions in
existing contractual commitments would have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and operating results.
Our future revenue is dependent in part upon our installed
customer base continuing to license or buy additional products,
renew maintenance agreements and purchase additional
services.
Our installed customer base has traditionally generated
additional new license, service and maintenance revenues. In
future periods, customers may not necessarily license or buy
additional products or contract for additional services or
maintenance. Maintenance is generally renewable annually at a
customers option, and there are no mandatory payment
obligations or obligations to license additional software. If
our customers decide not to renew their maintenance agreements
or license additional products or contract for additional
services, or if they reduce the scope of the maintenance
agreements, our revenue could decrease, which could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations. Our customers,
which include the largest semiconductor companies in the world,
often have significant bargaining power in negotiations with us.
Mergers of our customers can reduce the total level of purchases
of our software and services, and in some cases, increase
customers bargaining power in negotiations with their
suppliers, including us.
We depend upon our management team and key employees, and
our management changes or our failure to attract, train,
motivate and retain management and key employees in a timely
manner may make us less competitive in our industries and
therefore harm our results of operations.
Our business depends upon the efforts and abilities of our
executive officers and other key employees, including key
development personnel. From time to time, there may be changes
in our management team resulting from the hiring and departure
of executive officers. On October 15, 2008, we announced
the formation of an Interim Office of the Chief Executive to
oversee the day-to-day running of our operations and the
resignations of our President and Chief Executive Officer,
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer,
Executive Vice President Worldwide Field Operations,
Executive Vice President Products and Technologies
Organization and Executive Vice President Corporate
Affairs. As we undergo this transition, we may experience
disruption in our business which may harm our results of
operations and our relationships with our employees, customers
and suppliers may be adversely affected. In addition, our
competitors may seek to use this transition and the related
potential disruptions to gain a competitive advantage over us.
Although our Board of Directors has formed a search committee to
identify qualified candidates for Chief Executive Officer, we
cannot ascertain whether we will find qualified candidates
quickly or at all.
Competition for highly skilled executive officers and employees
can be intense, particularly in geographic areas recognized as
high technology centers such as the Silicon Valley area, where
our principal offices are located, and the other locations where
we maintain facilities. To attract, retain and motivate
individuals with the requisite expertise, we may be required to
grant large numbers of stock options or other stock-based
incentive awards, which may be dilutive to existing stockholders
and increase compensation expense, and pay significant base
salaries and cash bonuses, which could harm our operating
results. The high cost of training new employees, not fully
utilizing
53
these employees, or losing trained employees to competing
employers could also reduce our gross margins and harm our
business or operating results.
In addition, the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules require stockholder
approval for new equity compensation plans and significant
amendments to existing plans, including increases in shares
available for issuance under such plans, and prohibit NASDAQ
member organizations from giving a proxy to vote on equity
compensation plans unless the beneficial owner of the shares has
given voting instructions. These regulations could make it more
difficult for us to grant equity compensation to employees in
the future. To the extent that these regulations make it more
difficult or expensive to grant equity compensation to
employees, we may incur increased compensation costs or find it
difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, which could
materially and adversely affect our business.
We may not be able to effectively implement our
restructuring activities, and our restructuring activities may
not result in the expected benefits, which would negatively
impact our future results of operations.
We announced on November 5, 2008 that we initiated a plan
of restructuring in an effort to align our cost structure with
expected revenue. This restructuring would be intended to
decrease costs throughout our company. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to successfully complete and realize the
expected benefits of our restructuring plan, such as
improvements in operating margins and cash flows anticipated in
the restructuring periods contemplated. The restructuring plan
may involve higher costs or a longer timetable than we currently
anticipate or it may fail to improve our results of operations
as we anticipate. Our inability to realize these benefits may
result in an inefficient business structure that could
negatively impact our results of operations. We also expect our
restructuring plan to cause us to incur substantial costs
related to severance and other employee-related costs. Our
restructuring plan may also subject us to litigation risks and
expenses. Some of the employees whose employment we may
terminate may have valuable knowledge or expertise, the loss of
which may adversely affect our operations. In addition, our
restructuring plan may have other consequences, such as
attrition beyond our planned reduction in workforce or a
negative impact on employee morale and our competitors may seek
to gain a competitive advantage over us. Together with our
changes in management, the restructuring plan could also cause
our remaining employees to leave or result in reduced
productivity by our remaining employees, which in turn may
affect our revenue and other operating results in the future.
We may not receive significant revenue from our current
research and development efforts for several years, if
at all.
Internally developing software products, integrating acquired
software products and integrating intellectual property into
existing platforms is expensive, and these investments often
require a long time to generate returns. Our strategy involves
significant investments in research and development and related
product opportunities. We believe that we must continue to
dedicate a significant amount of resources to our research and
development efforts to maintain our competitive position.
However, we cannot predict that we will receive significant, if
any, revenue from these investments.
The competition in our industries is substantial and we
may not be able to continue to successfully compete in our
industries.
The EDA market and the commercial electronics design and
methodology services industries are highly competitive. If we
fail to compete successfully in these industries, it could
seriously harm our business, operating results or financial
condition. To compete in these industries, we must identify and
develop or acquire innovative and cost-competitive EDA products,
integrate them into platforms and market them in a timely
manner. We must also gain industry acceptance for our design and
methodology services and offer better strategic concepts,
technical solutions, prices and response time, or a combination
of these factors, than those of other design companies and the
internal design departments of electronics manufacturers. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully
in these industries. Factors that could affect our ability to
succeed include:
|
|
|
|
|
The development by others of competitive EDA products or
platforms and design and methodology services, which could
result in a shift of customer preferences away from our products
and services and significantly decrease revenue;
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Decisions by electronics manufacturers to perform design and
methodology services internally, rather than purchase these
services from outside vendors due to budget constraints or
excess engineering capacity;
|
|
|
The challenges of developing (or acquiring externally-developed)
technology solutions that are adequate and competitive in
meeting the requirements of next-generation design challenges;
|
|
|
The significant number of current and potential competitors in
the EDA industry and the low cost of entry;
|
|
|
Intense competition to attract acquisition targets, which may
make it more difficult for us to acquire companies or
technologies at an acceptable price or at all; and
|
|
|
The combination of or collaboration among many EDA companies to
deliver more comprehensive offerings than they could
individually.
|
We compete in the EDA products market with Synopsys, Inc., Magma
Design Automation, Inc. and Mentor Graphics. We also compete
with numerous smaller EDA companies, with manufacturers of
electronic devices that have developed or have the capability to
develop their own EDA products, and with numerous electronics
design and consulting companies. Manufacturers of electronic
devices may be reluctant to purchase design and methodology
services from independent vendors such as us because they wish
to promote their own internal design departments.
We may need to change our pricing models to compete
successfully.
The highly competitive markets in which we compete can put
pressure on us to reduce the prices of our products. If our
competitors offer deep discounts on certain products in an
effort to recapture or gain market segment share or to sell
other software or hardware products, we may then need to lower
our prices or offer other favorable terms to compete
successfully. Any such changes would be likely to reduce our
profit margins and could adversely affect our operating results.
Any substantial changes to our prices and pricing policies could
cause sales and software license revenues to decline or be
delayed as our sales force implements and our customers adjust
to the new pricing policies. Some of our competitors may bundle
products for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing
strategy or provide guarantees of prices and product
implementations. These practices could, over time, significantly
constrain the prices that we can charge for our products. If we
cannot offset price reductions with a corresponding increase in
the number of sales or with lower spending, then the reduced
license revenues resulting from lower prices could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations.
We have acquired and expect to acquire other companies and
businesses and may not realize the expected benefits of these
acquisitions.
We have acquired and expect to acquire other companies and
businesses in the future. While we expect to carefully analyze
each potential acquisition before committing to the transaction,
we may not be able to integrate and manage acquired products and
businesses effectively. In addition, acquisitions involve a
number of risks. If any of the following events occurs after we
acquire another business, it could seriously harm our business,
operating results or financial condition:
|
|
|
|
|
Difficulties in combining previously separate businesses into a
single unit;
|
|
|
The substantial diversion of managements attention from
day-to-day business when evaluating and negotiating these
transactions and integrating an acquired business;
|
|
|
The discovery, after completion of the acquisition, of
liabilities assumed from the acquired business or of assets
acquired for which we cannot realize the anticipated value;
|
|
|
The failure to realize anticipated benefits such as cost savings
and revenue enhancements;
|
|
|
The failure to retain key employees of the acquired business;
|
|
|
Difficulties related to integrating the products of an acquired
business in, for example, distribution, engineering and customer
support areas;
|
|
|
Unanticipated costs;
|
|
|
Exposure to undisclosed or unknown potential liabilities of an
acquired business;
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Customer dissatisfaction with existing license agreements with
us, which may dissuade them from licensing or buying products
acquired by us after the effective date of the license; and
|
|
|
The failure to understand and compete effectively in markets in
which we have limited experience.
|
In a number of our previously completed acquisitions, we have
agreed to make future payments, either in the form of employee
bonuses or contingent purchase price payments, or earnouts,
based on the performance of the acquired businesses or the
employees who joined us with the acquired businesses. The
performance goals pursuant to which these future payments may be
made generally relate to achievement by the acquired business or
the employees who joined us with the acquired business of
certain specified bookings, revenue, product proliferation,
product development or employee retention goals during a
specified period following completion of the applicable
acquisition. Future acquisitions may involve issuances of stock
as full or partial payment of the purchase price for the
acquired business, grants of incentive stock or options to
employees of the acquired businesses (which may be dilutive to
existing stockholders), expenditure of substantial cash
resources or the incurrence of material amounts of debt.
The specific performance goal levels and amounts and timing of
employee bonuses or contingent purchase price payments vary with
each acquisition. In connection with our acquisitions completed
prior to September 27, 2008, we may be obligated to pay up
to an aggregate of $57.5 million in cash during the next
47 months if certain performance goals related to one or
more of the criteria mentioned above are achieved in full. Of
this amount, up to $48.5 million would be expensed as
compensation expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations and up to $9.0 million would be added to the
purchase price of the acquisitions and will be recorded in
Goodwill in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, which
will change how business acquisitions are accounted for and will
impact financial statements both on the acquisition date and in
subsequent periods. SFAS No. 141R is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Early
adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the
impact that SFAS No. 141R will have on our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
We rely on our proprietary technology as well as software
and other intellectual property rights licensed to us by third
parties, and we cannot assure you that the precautions taken to
protect our rights will be adequate or that we will continue to
be able to adequately secure such intellectual property rights
from third parties.
Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary technology.
We generally rely on patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade
secret laws, licenses and restrictive agreements to establish
and protect our proprietary rights in technology and products.
Despite precautions we may take to protect our intellectual
property, third parties have tried in the past, and may try in
the future, to challenge, invalidate or circumvent these
safeguards. The rights granted under our patents or attendant to
our other intellectual property may not provide us with any
competitive advantages and there is no guarantee that patents
will be issued on any of our pending applications and future
patents may not be sufficiently broad to protect our technology.
Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our
proprietary rights in those countries to the same extent as
applicable law protects these rights in the United States. Many
of our products include software or other intellectual property
licensed from third parties. We may have to seek new or renew
existing licenses for such software and other intellectual
property in the future. Our design and methodology services
business holds licenses to certain software and other
intellectual property owned by third parties, including that of
our competitors. Our failure to obtain, for our use, software or
other intellectual property licenses or other intellectual
property rights on favorable terms, or the need to engage in
litigation over these licenses or rights, could seriously harm
our business, operating results or financial condition.
We could lose key technology or suffer serious harm to our
business because of the infringement of our intellectual
property rights by third parties or because of our infringement
of the intellectual property rights of third parties.
There are numerous patents in the EDA industry and new patents
are being issued at a rapid rate. It is not always practicable
to determine in advance whether a product or any of its
components infringes the patent rights of others. As a result,
from time to time, we may be compelled to respond to or
prosecute intellectual property infringement claims to protect
our rights or defend a customers rights.
56
Intellectual property infringement claims, regardless of merit,
could consume valuable management time, result in costly
litigation, or cause product shipment delays, all of which could
seriously harm our business, operating results or financial
condition. In settling these claims, we may be required to enter
into royalty or licensing agreements with the third parties
claiming infringement. These royalty or licensing agreements, if
available, may not have terms favorable to us. Being compelled
to enter into a license agreement with unfavorable terms could
seriously harm our business, operating results or financial
condition. Any potential intellectual property litigation could
compel us to do one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Pay damages (including the potential for treble damages),
license fees or royalties (including royalties for past periods)
to the party claiming infringement;
|
|
|
Stop licensing products or providing services that use the
challenged intellectual property;
|
|
|
Obtain a license from the owner of the infringed intellectual
property to sell or use the relevant technology, which license
may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all; or
|
|
|
Redesign the challenged technology, which could be
time-consuming and costly, or not be accomplished.
|
If we were compelled to take any of these actions, our business
or results of operations may suffer.
If our security measures are breached and an unauthorized
party obtains access to customer data, our information systems
may be perceived as being unsecure and customers may curtail or
stop their use of our products and services.
Our products and services involve the storage and transmission
of customers proprietary information, and breaches of our
security measures could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of
this information, litigation and potential liability. Because
techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage
information systems change frequently and generally are not
recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to
anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive
measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security
occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our
security measures could be harmed and we could lose existing
customers and our ability to obtain new customers.
The long sales cycle of our products and services makes
the timing of our revenue difficult to predict and may cause our
operating results to fluctuate unexpectedly.
Generally, we have a long sales cycle that can extend up to six
months or longer. The length of the sales cycle may cause our
revenue or operating results to vary from quarter to quarter.
The complexity and expense associated with our business
generally require a lengthy customer education, evaluation and
approval process. Consequently, we may incur substantial
expenses and devote significant management effort and expense to
develop potential relationships that do not result in agreements
or revenue and may prevent us from pursuing other opportunities.
In addition, sales of our products and services may be delayed
if customers delay approval or commencement of projects because
of:
|
|
|
|
|
The timing of customers competitive evaluation
processes; or
|
|
|
Customers budgetary constraints and budget cycles.
|
Long sales cycles for acceleration and emulation hardware
products subject us to a number of significant risks over which
we have limited control, including insufficient, excess or
obsolete inventory, variations in inventory valuation and
fluctuations in quarterly operating results.
The majority of our contracts are executed in the final two
weeks of a fiscal quarter. This makes it difficult to determine
with accuracy how much business will be executed in each fiscal
quarter. Also, because of the timing of large orders and our
customers buying patterns, we may not learn of bookings
shortfalls, revenue shortfalls, earnings shortfalls or other
failures to meet market expectations until late in a fiscal
quarter. These factors may cause our operating results to
fluctuate unexpectedly, which can cause significant fluctuations
in the trading price of our common stock.
57
We may not be able to sell certain installment contracts
to generate cash, which may impact our operating cash flows for
any particular fiscal period.
We sell certain installment contracts to certain financing
institutions on a non-recourse or limited-recourse basis to
generate cash. Our ability to complete these sales of
installment contracts is affected by a number of factors,
including the:
|
|
|
|
|
Economic conditions in the securities markets;
|
|
|
Credit policies of the financing institutions; and
|
|
|
Credit quality of customers whose installment contracts we wish
to sell.
|
Disruptions in the financial markets may adversely impact the
availability and cost of financing transactions and the
installment contract sales that we have already arranged. As a
result of the credit losses recorded by banks over the last
twelve months and the current financial crisis experienced by
banks, a number of banks have become less willing to purchase
assets because of capital constraints and concerns about
over-exposure to the technology sector. In addition, due to the
change in the license mix that will result in an increased
number of subscription licenses that cannot be transferred to
financing institutions, we expect a reduced level of Proceeds
from the sale of receivables. If we are unable to sell certain
installment contracts, our operating cash flows would be
adversely affected. There can be no assurance that funding will
be available to us or, if available, that it will be on terms
acceptable to us. If sources of funding are not available to us
on a regular basis for any reason, including the occurrence of
events of default, deterioration in credit quality in the
underlying pool of receivables or otherwise, it would have a
material adverse effect on our operating cash flows.
If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become
impaired we may be required to record a significant charge to
earnings.
We review our amortizable intangible assets for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at
least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in
circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill
or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable include
a decline in stock price and market capitalization, reduced
future cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates in our
industry. We could be required to record a significant charge to
earnings in our financial statements during the period in which
any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets
is determined, which could materially adversely impact our
results of operations.
The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations and other
risks to our international operations may seriously harm our
financial condition.
We have significant operations outside the United States. Our
revenue from international operations as a percentage of total
revenue was approximately 61% for the three months ended
September 27, 2008 and 60% for the three months ended
September 29, 2007. We expect that revenue from our
international operations will continue to account for a
significant portion of our total revenue. We also transact
business in various foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese
yen. The volatility of foreign currencies in certain regions,
most notably the Japanese yen, European Union euro, British
pound and Indian rupee have had, and may in the future have, a
harmful effect on our revenue or operating results.
Fluctuations in the rate of exchange between the United States
dollar and the currencies of other countries in which we conduct
business could seriously harm our business, operating results or
financial condition. For example, when a foreign currency
declines in value relative to the United States dollar, it takes
more of the foreign currency to purchase the same amount of
United States dollars than before the change. If we price our
products and services in the foreign currency, we receive fewer
United States dollars than we did before the change. If we price
our products and services in United States dollars, the decrease
in value of the local currency results in an increase in the
price for our products and services compared to those products
of our competitors that are priced in local currency. This could
result in our prices being uncompetitive in markets where
business is transacted in the local currency. On the other hand,
when a foreign currency increases in value relative to the
United States dollar, it takes more United States dollars to
purchase the same amount of the foreign currency. As we use the
foreign currency to pay for payroll costs and other operating
expenses in our international operations, this results in an
increase in operating expenses.
58
Exposure to foreign currency transaction risk can arise when
transactions are conducted in a currency different from the
functional currency of one of our subsidiaries. A
subsidiarys functional currency is generally the currency
in which it primarily conducts its operations, including product
pricing, expenses and borrowings. Although we attempt to reduce
the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, significant
exchange rate movements may hurt our results of operations as
expressed in United States dollars.
Our international operations may also be subject to other risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
The adoption or expansion of government trade restrictions;
|
|
|
Limitations on repatriation of earnings;
|
|
|
Limitations on the conversion of foreign currencies;
|
|
|
Reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some
countries;
|
|
|
Recessions in foreign economies;
|
|
|
Longer collection periods for receivables and greater difficulty
in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
Difficulties in managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
Political and economic instability;
|
|
|
Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
Tariffs and other trade barriers; and
|
|
|
United States and other governments licensing requirements
for exports, which may lengthen the sales cycle or restrict or
prohibit the sale or licensing of certain products.
|
We have offices throughout the world, including key research and
development facilities outside of the United States. Our
operations are dependent upon the connectivity of our operations
throughout the world. Activities that interfere with our
international connectivity, such as computer hacking or the
introduction of a virus into our computer systems, could
significantly interfere with our business operations.
Our operating results could be adversely affected as a
result of changes in our effective tax rates.
Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we are
taxed at lower rates as compared to the United States federal
and state statutory tax rates;
|
|
|
An increase in expenses not deductible for tax purposes,
including certain stock-based compensation, write-offs of
acquired in-process technology and impairment of goodwill;
|
|
|
Changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets;
|
|
|
Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws;
|
|
|
Changes in judgment from the evaluation of new information that
results in a recognition, derecognition, or change in
measurement of a tax position taken in a prior period;
|
|
|
Increases to interest expenses classified in the financial
statements as income taxes;
|
|
|
New accounting standards or interpretations of such standards;
|
|
|
A change in our decision to indefinitely reinvest foreign
earnings outside the United States; or
|
|
|
Results of tax examinations by the IRS and state and foreign tax
authorities.
|
Any significant change in our future effective tax rates could
adversely impact our results of operations for future periods.
We have received an examination report from the IRS
proposing deficiencies in certain of our tax returns, and the
outcome of current and future tax examinations may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash
flows.
The IRS and other tax authorities regularly examine our income
tax returns. In July 2006, the IRS completed its field
examination of our federal income tax returns for the tax years
2000 through 2002 and issued an RAR in which the IRS proposed to
assess an aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year period of
approximately $324.0 million. In November 2006, the IRS
revised the proposed aggregate tax deficiency for the three-year
period to be approximately $318.0 million. The IRS is
contesting our qualification for deferred recognition of certain
proceeds received from restitution and settlement in connection
with litigation during the period. The proposed tax deficiency
for this item is approximately $152.0 million. The
remaining proposed tax deficiency of approximately
$166.0 million is
59
primarily related to proposed adjustments to our transfer
pricing arrangements with foreign subsidiaries and to our
deductions for foreign trade income. The IRS may make similar
claims against our transfer pricing arrangements and deductions
for foreign trade income in future examinations. We have filed a
timely protest with the IRS and will seek resolution of the
issues through the Appeals Office.
We believe that the proposed IRS adjustments are inconsistent
with applicable tax laws and we are vigorously challenging these
proposed adjustments. The RAR is not a final Statutory Notice of
Deficiency but the IRS imposes interest on the proposed
deficiencies until the matters are resolved. Interest is
compounded daily at rates published and adjusted quarterly by
the IRS and have been between 4% and 10% since 2001. The IRS is
currently examining our federal income tax returns for the tax
years 2003 through 2005.
Significant judgment is required in applying the principles of
FIN No. 48 and SFAS No. 109. The calculation
of our provision for income taxes involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and
regulations. In determining the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes, we regularly assess the potential settlement
outcomes resulting from income tax examinations. However, the
final outcome of tax examinations, including the total amount
payable or the timing of any such payments upon resolution of
these issues, cannot be estimated with certainty. In addition,
we cannot be certain that such amount will not be materially
different than that which is reflected in our historical income
tax provisions and accruals. Should the IRS or other tax
authorities assess additional taxes as a result of a current or
a future examination, we may be required to record charges to
operations in future periods that could have a material impact
on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows
in the applicable period or periods.
Forecasting our estimated annual effective tax rate is
complex and subject to uncertainty, and material differences
between forecasted and actual tax rates could have a material
impact on our results of operations.
Forecasts of our income tax position and resultant effective tax
rate are complex and subject to uncertainty because our income
tax position for each year combines the effects of estimating
our annual income or loss, the mix of profits and losses earned
by us and our subsidiaries in tax jurisdictions with a broad
range of income tax rates, as well as benefits from available
deferred tax assets, the impact of various accounting rules and
changes to these rules and results of tax audits. To forecast
our global tax rate, pre-tax profits and losses by jurisdiction
are estimated and tax expense by jurisdiction is calculated. If
our estimate of the pre-tax profit and losses, the mix of our
profits and losses, our ability to use deferred tax assets, the
results of tax audits, or effective tax rates by jurisdiction is
different than those estimates, our actual tax rate could be
materially different than forecasted, which could have a
material impact on our results of operations.
Failure to obtain export licenses could harm our business
by rendering us unable to ship products and transfer our
technology outside of the United States.
We must comply with regulations of the United States and of
certain other countries in shipping our software products and
transferring our technology outside the United States and to
foreign nationals. Although we have not had any significant
difficulty complying with such regulations so far, any
significant future difficulty in complying could harm our
business, operating results or financial condition.
Errors or defects in our products and services could
expose us to liability and harm our reputation.
Our customers use our products and services in designing and
developing products that involve a high degree of technological
complexity, each of which has its own specifications. Because of
the complexity of the systems and products with which we work,
some of our products and designs can be adequately tested only
when put to full use in the marketplace. As a result, our
customers or their end users may discover errors or defects in
our software or the systems we design, or the products or
systems incorporating our design and intellectual property may
not operate as expected. Errors or defects could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of customers;
|
|
|
Loss of market segment share;
|
|
|
Failure to attract new customers or achieve market acceptance;
|
|
|
Diversion of development resources to resolve the problem;
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of or delay in revenue;
|
|
|
Increased service costs; and
|
|
|
Liability for damages.
|
If we become subject to unfair hiring claims, we could be
prevented from hiring needed employees, incur liability for
damages and incur substantial costs in defending
ourselves.
Companies in our industry whose employees accept positions with
competitors frequently claim that these competitors have engaged
in unfair hiring practices or that the employment of these
persons would involve the disclosure or use of trade secrets.
These claims could prevent us from hiring employees or cause us
to incur liability for damages. We could also incur substantial
costs in defending ourselves or our employees against these
claims, regardless of their merits. Defending ourselves from
these claims could also divert the attention of our management
away from our operations.
Our business is subject to the risk of earthquakes.
Our corporate headquarters, including certain of our research
and development operations and certain of our distribution
facilities, is located in the Silicon Valley area of Northern
California, which is a region known to experience seismic
activity. If significant seismic activity were to occur, our
operations may be interrupted, which would adversely impact our
business and results of operations.
We maintain research and development and other facilities
in parts of the world that are not as politically stable as the
United States, and as a result we may face a higher risk of
business interruption from acts of war or terrorism than
businesses located only or primarily in the United
States.
We maintain international research and development and other
facilities, some of which are in parts of the world that are not
as politically stable as the United States. Consequently, we may
face a greater risk of business interruption as a result of
terrorist acts or military conflicts than businesses located
domestically. Furthermore, this potential harm is exacerbated
given that damage to or disruptions at our international
research and development facilities could have an adverse effect
on our ability to develop new or improve existing products as
compared to other businesses which may only have sales offices
or other less critical operations abroad. We are not insured for
losses or interruptions caused by acts of war or terrorism.
Risks
Related to Our Securities and Indebtedness
Our debt obligations expose us to risks that could
adversely affect our business, operating results or financial
condition, and could prevent us from fulfilling our obligations
under such indebtedness.
We have a substantial level of debt. As of September 27,
2008, we had $500.2 million of outstanding indebtedness as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
$250.0 million related to our 1.375% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2011, or the 2011 Notes;
|
|
|
$250.0 million related to our 1.500% Convertible
Senior Notes Due 2013, or the 2013 Notes and, together with the
2011 Notes, the Convertible Senior Notes; and
|
|
|
$0.2 million related to our Zero Coupon Zero Yield Senior
Convertible Notes Due 2023, or the 2023 Notes.
|
The level of our current or future indebtedness, among other
things, could:
|
|
|
|
|
Make it difficult for us to satisfy our payment obligations on
our debt as described below;
|
|
|
Make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our
business;
|
|
|
Reduce funds available for use in our operations;
|
|
|
Make it difficult for us to incur additional debt or obtain any
necessary financing in the future for working capital, capital
expenditures, debt service, acquisitions or general corporate
purposes;
|
|
|
Impose operating or financial covenants on us;
|
|
|
Limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in
our business; or
|
|
|
Place us at a possible competitive disadvantage relative to less
leveraged competitors and competitors that have greater access
to capital resources.
|
61
If we are prohibited from paying our outstanding indebtedness,
we could try to obtain the consent of the lenders under those
arrangements to make such payment, or we could attempt to
refinance the borrowings that contain the restrictions. If we do
not obtain the necessary consents or refinance the borrowings,
we may be unable to satisfy our outstanding indebtedness. Any
such failure would constitute an event of default under our
indebtedness, which could, in turn, constitute a default under
the terms of any other indebtedness then outstanding.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise
obtain funds necessary to make required payments, or if we fail
to comply with the various requirements of our indebtedness, we
would be in default, which would permit the holders of our
indebtedness to accelerate the maturity of the indebtedness and
could cause defaults under our other indebtedness as well.
Because of the widespread problems in global capital markets and
financial institutions, compounded by the increasingly
challenging and price-conscious economic environment and our
lower levels of business, we may not be able to secure
additional funding in the capital markets. Any default under our
indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition. In
addition, a material default on our indebtedness could suspend
our eligibility to register securities using certain
registration statement forms under SEC guidelines that permit
incorporation by reference of substantial information regarding
us, which could potentially hinder our ability to raise capital
through the issuance of our securities and will increase the
costs of such registration to us.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement), which will require us to recognize additional
non-cash interest expense related to our Convertible Senior
Notes in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
FSP APB 14-1
is effective for fiscal 2009 and is required to be applied
retrospectively for all periods for which our Convertible Senior
Notes were outstanding prior to the date of adoption. FSP APB
14-1 will
have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial
condition, particularly with respect to interest expense ratios
commonly referred to by lenders, and could potentially hinder
our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt or
equity securities.
Conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes will dilute the
ownership interests of existing stockholders.
The terms of the Convertible Senior Notes permit the holders to
convert the Convertible Senior Notes into shares of our common
stock. The terms of the Convertible Senior Notes stipulate a net
share settlement, which upon conversion of the Convertible
Senior Notes requires us to pay the principal amount in cash and
the conversion premium, if any, in shares of our common stock
based on a daily settlement amount, calculated on a
proportionate basis for each day of the relevant 20
trading-day
observation period. The initial conversion rate for the
Convertible Senior Notes is 47.2813 shares of our common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes,
equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $21.15 per
share of our common stock. The conversion price is subject to
adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for accrued
interest, except in limited circumstances. The conversion of
some or all of the Convertible Senior Notes will dilute the
ownership interest of our existing stockholders. Any sales in
the public market of the common stock issuable upon conversion
could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common
stock.
Each $1,000 of principal of the Convertible Senior Notes is
initially convertible into 47.2813 shares of our common
stock, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified
events. Holders of the Convertible Senior Notes may convert
their notes at their option on any day prior to the close of
business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding
December 15, 2011 in the case of the 2011 Notes and
December 15, 2013 in the case of the 2013 Notes, in each
case only if:
|
|
|
|
|
The price of our common stock reaches $27.50 during certain
periods of time specified in the Convertible Senior Notes;
|
|
|
Specified corporate transactions occur; or
|
|
|
The trading price of the Convertible Senior Notes falls below a
certain threshold.
|
On and after November 2, 2011, in the case of the 2011
Notes, and November 1, 2013, in the case of the 2013 Notes,
until the close of business on the scheduled trading day
immediately preceding the maturity date of such Convertible
Senior Notes, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes
at any time, regardless of the
62
foregoing circumstances. As of September 27, 2008, none of
the conditions allowing holders of the Convertible Senior Notes
to convert had been met.
Although the conversion price of the Convertible Senior Notes is
currently $21.15 per share, we entered into hedge and separate
warrant transactions to reduce the potential dilution from the
conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes. However, we cannot
guarantee that such hedges and warrant instruments will fully
mitigate the dilution. In addition, the existence of the
Convertible Senior Notes may encourage short selling by market
participants because the conversion of the Convertible Senior
Notes could depress the price of our common stock.
At the option of the Convertible Senior Noteholders, under
certain circumstances we may be required to repurchase the
Convertible Senior Notes in cash or shares of our common
stock.
Under the terms of the Convertible Senior Notes, we may be
required to repurchase the Convertible Senior Notes following a
fundamental change in our corporate ownership or
structure, such as a change of control in which substantially
all of the consideration does not consist of publicly traded
securities, prior to maturity of the Convertible Senior Notes.
The repurchase price for the Convertible Senior Notes in the
event of a fundamental change must be paid solely in cash. This
repayment obligation may have the effect of discouraging,
delaying or preventing a takeover of our company that may
otherwise be beneficial to investors.
Hedge and warrant transactions entered into in connection
with the issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes may affect the
value of our common stock.
We entered into hedge transactions with various financial
institutions, at the time of issuance of the Convertible Senior
Notes, with the objective of reducing the potential dilutive
effect of issuing our common stock upon conversion of the
Convertible Senior Notes. We also entered into separate warrant
transactions with the same financial institutions. In connection
with our hedge and warrant transactions, these financial
institutions purchased our common stock in secondary market
transactions and entered into various over-the-counter
derivative transactions with respect to our common stock. These
entities or their affiliates are likely to modify their hedge
positions from time to time prior to conversion or maturity of
the Convertible Senior Notes by purchasing and selling shares of
our common stock, other of our securities or other instruments
they may wish to use in connection with such hedging. Any of
these transactions and activities could adversely affect the
value of our common stock and, as a result, the number of shares
and the value of the common stock holders will receive upon
conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes. In addition, subject
to movement in the price of our common stock, if the hedge
transactions settle in our favor, we could be exposed to credit
risk related to the other party with respect to the payment we
are owed from such other party.
Rating agencies may provide unsolicited ratings on the
Convertible Senior Notes that could reduce the market value or
liquidity of our common stock.
We have not requested a rating of the Convertible Senior Notes
from any rating agency and we do not anticipate that the
Convertible Senior Notes will be rated. However, if one or more
rating agencies independently elects to rate the Convertible
Senior Notes and assigns the Convertible Senior Notes a rating
lower than the rating expected by investors, or reduces such
rating in the future, the market price or liquidity of the
Convertible Senior Notes and our common stock could be harmed.
Should a decline in the market price of the Convertible Senior
Notes result, as compared to the price of our common stock, this
may trigger the right of the holders of the Convertible Senior
Notes to convert the Convertible Senior Notes into cash and
shares of our common stock.
Anti-takeover defenses in our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws and certain provisions under Delaware law could
prevent an acquisition of our company or limit the price that
investors might be willing to pay for our common stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and certain
provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law that apply to
us could make it difficult for another company to acquire
control of our company. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
Our certificate of incorporation allows our Board of Directors
to issue, at any time and without stockholder approval,
preferred stock with such terms as it may determine. No shares
of preferred stock are currently outstanding. However, the
rights of holders of any of our preferred stock that may be
issued in the future may be superior to the rights of holders of
our common stock.
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any
business combination with a person owning 15% or more of its
voting stock, or who is affiliated with the corporation and
owned 15% or more of its voting stock at any time within three
years prior to the proposed business combination, for a period
of three years from the date the person became a 15% owner,
unless specified conditions are met.
|
All or any one of these factors could limit the price that
certain investors would be willing to pay for shares of our
common stock and could delay, prevent or allow our Board of
Directors to resist an acquisition of our company, even if a
proposed transaction were favored by a majority of our
independent stockholders.
64
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
In February 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a program to
repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market with a
value of up to $500.0 million in the aggregate. In August
2008, our Board of Directors authorized a new program to
repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market with a
value of up to an additional $500.0 million in the
aggregate. The following table sets forth the repurchases we
made during the three months ended September 27, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
May Yet
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
Plan or Program*
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased*
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Plan or Program
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
June 29, 2008
August 2, 2008
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
|
$
|
8.38
|
|
|
----
|
|
$
|
412.1
|
|
August 3, 2008
August 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,933,731
|
|
|
$
|
7.99
|
|
|
3,913,000
|
|
$
|
880.8
|
|
August 31, 2008
September 27, 2008
|
|
|
3,369,763
|
|
|
$
|
7.90
|
|
|
3,346,700
|
|
$
|
854.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,311,667
|
|
|
$
|
7.95
|
|
|
7,259,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Shares purchased that were not part of our publicly announced
repurchase program represent the surrender of shares of
restricted stock to pay income taxes due upon vesting, and do
not reduce the dollar value that may yet be purchased under our
publicly announced repurchase program. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
65
(a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
|
|
Provided
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
No.
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
3.01
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective
July 29, 2008.
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
001-10606
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
8/1/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Registrant and its
directors and executive officers, as amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.02
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Award Agreement for performance-based
Incentive Stock Awards granted prior to July 29, 2008, as
amended and restated, under the Registrants 1987 Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.03
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Award Agreement for performance-based
Incentive Stock Awards to be granted subsequent to July 29,
2008, under the Registrants 1987 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.04
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Residential Lease,
effective as of July 29, 2008, among 849 College Avenue,
Inc., a subsidiary of the Registrant, Kevin Bushby and Elizabeth
Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.05
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and Michael J. Fister.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.06
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and Michael J.
Fister.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.07
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and William Porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.08
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and William Porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.09
|
|
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2008, between the
Registrant and William Porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.10
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and Kevin Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.11
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.12
|
|
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2008, between the
Registrant and Kevin Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.13
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and James S. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
|
|
Provided
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
No.
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
10.14
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and James S.
Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.15
|
|
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2008, between the
Registrant and James S. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.16
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and Kevin S. Palatnik.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amended and Restated First Amendment to Employment Agreement,
effective as of October 15, 2008, between the Registrant
and R.L. Smith McKeithen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Senior Vice President and
Member and Chief of Staff of the Interim Office of the Chief
Executive
(Person Performing Functions Similar to a Principal Executive
Officer of the Registrant), pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Senior Vice President and
Member and Chief of Staff of the Interim Office of the Chief
Executive
(Person Performing Functions Similar to a Principal Executive
Officer of the Registrant), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charlie Huang
Charlie
Huang
Senior Vice President and Member and Chief of Staff of the
Interim Office of the Chief Executive
(Person Performing Functions Similar to a Principal Executive
Officer of the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Kevin S. Palatnik
Kevin
S. Palatnik
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
68
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
|
|
Provided
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
No.
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
3.01
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective
July 29, 2008.
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
|
001-10606
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
8/1/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01
|
|
Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Registrant and its
directors and executive officers, as amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.02
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Award Agreement for performance-based
Incentive Stock Awards granted prior to July 29, 2008, as
amended and restated, under the Registrants 1987 Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.03
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Award Agreement for performance-based
Incentive Stock Awards to be granted subsequent to July 29,
2008, under the Registrants 1987 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.04
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Residential Lease,
effective as of July 29, 2008, among 849 College Avenue,
Inc., a subsidiary of the Registrant, Kevin Bushby and Elizabeth
Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.05
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and Michael J. Fister.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.06
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and Michael J.
Fister.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.07
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and William Porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.08
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and William Porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.09
|
|
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2008, between the
Registrant and William Porter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.10
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and Kevin Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.11
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.12
|
|
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2008, between the
Registrant and Kevin Bushby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.13
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and James S. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.14
|
|
Executive Transition and Release Agreement, effective as of
October 15, 2008, between the Registrant and James S.
Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.15
|
|
Agreement, effective as of October 15, 2008, between the
Registrant and James S. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing
|
|
Provided
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
No.
|
|
Date
|
|
Herewith
|
|
10.16
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective as of July 29, 2008,
between the Registrant and Kevin S. Palatnik.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10.17
|
|
Amended and Restated First Amendment to Employment Agreement,
effective as of October 15, 2008, between the Registrant
and R.L. Smith McKeithen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Senior Vice President and
Member and Chief of Staff of the Interim Office of the Chief
Executive
(Person Performing Functions Similar to a Principal Executive
Officer of the Registrant), pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.01
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Senior Vice President and
Member and Chief of Staff of the Interim Office of the Chief
Executive
(Person Performing Functions Similar to a Principal Executive
Officer of the Registrant), pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32.02
|
|
Certification of the Registrants Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|