e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2008, or
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
.
|
Commission file
number: 1-3754
GMAC LLC
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
38-0572512
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
200 Renaissance Center
P.O. Box 200 Detroit, Michigan
48265-2000
(Address of principal
executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(313) 556-5000
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No
þ
GMAC
LLC
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007
|
|
4
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
5
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
6
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
7
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
35
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
69
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
71
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
71
|
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use
of Proceeds
|
|
74
|
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
74
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
|
74
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
74
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
76
|
Feldstein Letter Agreement, dated March 20, 2008 |
Khattri Letter Agreement, dated March 13, 2008 |
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
GMAC
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
$1,821
|
|
|
|
$2,528
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
|
|
5,298
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense on operating lease assets
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
Servicing asset valuation and hedge activities, net
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and service revenue earned
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
Loss on mortgage and automotive loans, net
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
Investment (loss) income
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenue
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits expense
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
2,454
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax expense
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
($589
|
)
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
|
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
3
GMAC
LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$14,836
|
|
|
|
$17,677
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
16,740
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
21,446
|
|
|
|
20,559
|
|
Finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer ($3,915 at fair value at March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
80,493
|
|
|
|
87,769
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
41,232
|
|
|
|
39,745
|
|
Allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
(2,292
|
)
|
|
|
(2,755
|
)
|
|
|
Total finance receivables and loans, net
|
|
|
119,433
|
|
|
|
124,759
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
|
33,122
|
|
|
|
32,348
|
|
Notes receivable from General Motors
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
4,703
|
|
Premiums and other insurance receivables
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
31,446
|
|
|
|
28,255
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$243,354
|
|
|
|
$248,939
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
$99,824
|
|
|
|
$102,339
|
|
Secured ($4,299 at fair value at March 31, 2008)
|
|
|
85,470
|
|
|
|
90,809
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
185,294
|
|
|
|
193,148
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,356
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
Unearned insurance premiums and service revenue
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
|
|
4,921
|
|
Reserves for insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
3,096
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
Deposit liabilities
|
|
|
17,961
|
|
|
|
15,281
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
14,078
|
|
|
|
13,432
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
228,590
|
|
|
|
233,374
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members interest
|
|
|
8,915
|
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
Preferred interests
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
4,649
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
14,764
|
|
|
|
15,565
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
$243,354
|
|
|
|
$248,939
|
|
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
4
GMAC
LLC
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Retained
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
Total
|
|
Comprehensive
|
($ in millions)
|
|
interest
|
|
interests
|
|
earnings
|
|
income
|
|
equity
|
|
income (loss)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
|
$6,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7,173
|
|
|
|
$485
|
|
|
|
$14,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
Preferred interests dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007
|
|
|
$7,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$6,816
|
|
|
|
$505
|
|
|
|
$15,066
|
|
|
|
($285
|
)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 before cumulative effect
of adjustments
|
|
|
$8,912
|
|
|
|
$1,052
|
|
|
|
$4,649
|
|
|
|
$952
|
|
|
|
$15,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 159 (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 after cumulative effect
of adjustments
|
|
|
8,912
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
4,494
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
15,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
($589
|
)
|
Preferred interests dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
$8,915
|
|
|
|
$1,052
|
|
|
|
$3,880
|
|
|
|
$917
|
|
|
|
$14,764
|
|
|
|
($624
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Refer to Note 10 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
5
GMAC
LLC
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
$1,061
|
|
|
|
$4,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
(6,462
|
)
|
|
|
(11,960
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
9,976
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in finance receivables and loans
|
|
|
(1,477
|
)
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of finance receivables and loans
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
5,147
|
|
|
|
Purchases of operating lease assets
|
|
|
(4,583
|
)
|
|
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
|
Disposals of operating lease assets
|
|
|
1,957
|
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
|
Sales of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in notes receivable from General Motors
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
|
|
(984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(2,827
|
)
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in short-term debt
|
|
|
(3,613
|
)
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in bank deposits
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
11,621
|
|
|
|
13,678
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(11,573
|
)
|
|
|
(26,478
|
)
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
Other, net (a)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(961
|
)
|
|
|
(12,782
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,841
|
)
|
|
|
(5,802
|
)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
17,677
|
|
|
|
15,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at March 31,
|
|
|
$14,836
|
|
|
|
$9,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes $1 billion capital
contribution from General Motors during the three months ended
March 31, 2007, pursuant to the sale of 51% of GMAC to
FIM Holdings LLC.
|
|
The Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are
an integral part of these statements.
6
1. Basis
of Presentation
GMAC LLC was founded in 1919 as a wholly owned subsidiary of
General Motors Corporation (General Motors or GM). On
November 30, 2006, GM sold a 51% interest in us (the
Sale Transactions) to FIM Holdings LLC
(FIM Holdings). FIM Holdings is an investment
consortium led by Cerberus FIM Investors, LLC, the
sole managing member. The consortium also includes Citigroup
Inc., Aozora Bank Ltd., and a subsidiary of The PNC Financial
Services Group, Inc. The terms GMAC, the
company, we, our, and
us refer to GMAC LLC and its subsidiaries as a
consolidated entity, except where it is clear that the terms
mean only GMAC LLC.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of
March 31, 2008, and for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, are unaudited but, in
managements opinion, include all adjustments consisting of
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the results for the interim periods.
The interim-period consolidated financial statements, including
the related notes, are condensed and are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (GAAP) for interim reporting. The preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. These interim-period Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
February 27, 2008.
Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap), our mortgage subsidiary,
actively manages its liquidity and capital position and has
developed plans to address its liquidity needs, including debt
maturing in 2008 and other identified risks and uncertainties.
These plans include, but are not limited to the following:
continue to work proactively and maintain an active dialog with
all of ResCaps key credit providers to optimize all
available liquidity options including negotiating credit terms,
refinancing term loans and other secured facilities; potential
pursuit of strategic alternatives that will improve
ResCaps liquidity such as continued strategic reduction of
assets and other dispositions, focused production on prime
conforming products which currently provide more liquidity
options, explore potential alliances and joint ventures with
third-parties involving portions of ResCaps business;
potential utilization of available committed unsecured lines of
credit; certain asset liquidations; and explore opportunities
for GMAC to provide funding or capital support to ResCap (there
can be no assurances, however, that GMAC will undertake any such
actions). Asset liquidation initiatives may include, among other
things, sale of retained interest in ResCaps mortgage
securitizations, marketing of loans secured by time-share
receivables, marketing of ResCaps United Kingdom and
Continental Europe mortgage loan portfolios, and whole loan
sales among other initiatives.
With respect to these plans, we are currently in negotiations
with ResCap to provide it with a new
2-year
$3.5 billion senior secured credit facility, which is
conditioned on successfully completing the debt tender and
exchange offer for ResCaps outstanding unsecured notes.
However, there can be no assurances that we will undertake any
such actions. Additionally, ResCap is seeking amendments to
substantially all of its secured bilateral facilities that would
extend the maturities of such facilities or modify the tangible
net worth covenant contained in such facilities. For further
details with respect to the foregoing plans, refer to
Note 13 Subsequent Events.
While successful execution cannot be assured, management
believes the plans are sufficient to meet ResCaps
liquidity requirements over the next twelve months. If
unanticipated market factors emerge and/or ResCap is unable to
successfully execute its plans, referenced above, it would have
a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial position.
7
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Share-Based
Compensation Plans
In 2007, the Compensation Committee approved the Long-Term
Phantom Interest Plan (LTIP) and a Management Profits Interest
Plan (MPI). Both plans meet the definition of share-based
compensation awards, and therefore are accounted for under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). These
compensation plans provide our executives with an opportunity to
share in the future growth in value of GMAC, which is necessary
to attract and retain key executives. The first grants of our
plans were made in the first quarter of 2007. The Compensation
Committee authorized additional LTIP and MPI awards during the
first quarter of 2008.
The LTIP is an incentive plan for executives based on the
appreciation of GMACs value in excess of 10% during a
three-year performance period. The awards vest at the end of the
performance period and are paid in cash following a valuation of
GMAC performed by FIM Holdings. The awards do not entitle
the participant to an equity-ownership interest in GMAC. At
March 31, 2008, 329 units were issued and outstanding
for the
2007-2009
performance period, and 467 units were issued and outstanding
for the
2008-2010
performance period. Under SFAS 123(R), the awards require
liability treatment and are remeasured quarterly at fair value
until they are settled. The compensation cost related to these
awards will be ratably charged to expense over the requisite
service period, which are the vesting periods ending
December 31, 2009 and 2010, for the respective awards.
We utilize a Black-Scholes model to fair value the LTIP awards,
which considers expected volatility, expected term of the
awards, and changes in our performance, market, and industry.
Changes in fair value relating to the portion of the awards that
have vested will be recognized in earnings in the period in
which the changes occur. The estimated fair value of the awards
outstanding at March 31, 2008, was approximately
$21 million. Compensation (income) expense recognized
during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
was ($10) million and $4 million, respectively. We
recognized compensation income for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, due to a decline in the value of the
liability mainly as a result of forfeitures and a change in
assumptions due to information obtained during the same period.
The MPI is an incentive plan whereby Class C Membership
interests in GMAC held by a management company are granted to
senior executives.
Series C-1
(C-1) awards were granted beginning in the first quarter of
2007;
Series C-2
(C-2) and
Series C-2A
(C-2A) awards were granted beginning in the first quarter of
2008. The number of Class C Membership Interests available
to be issued was also increased from 5,820 to 8,330. The total
Class C Membership interests outstanding at
March 31, 2008, were approximately 6,556, comprised of
3,873 C-1, 1,852 C-2, and 831 C-2A awards. Half of the awards
vest based on a service requirement, and half vest based on
meeting operating performance objectives. The service portion
vests ratably over five years beginning
November 30, 2007, for C-1 and C-2A awards and
November 30, 2008, for C-2 awards, and on each of the
next four anniversaries thereafter. The performance portion
vests based on five separate annual targets beginning in 2007
for C-1 and C-2A awards and in 2008 for C-2 awards. If the
performance objectives are met, that years pro rata share
of the awards vest. If the current year objectives are not met
but the annual performance objectives of a subsequent year are
met, all unvested shares from previous years will vest. Any
awards that do not vest during the five one-year performance
periods will be forfeited. Under SFAS 123(R), the awards
require equity treatment and are fair valued as of their grant
date. We utilize a Black-Scholes model to determine the grant
date fair value of the MPI awards, which considers expected
volatility, expected term of the awards, and changes in our
performance, market, and industry. Compensation expense for the
MPI awards is ratably charged to expense over the five-year
requisite service period for service-based awards and over each
one-year requisite service period for the performance-based
awards, both to the extent the awards actually vest. During the
third quarter of 2007, the performance vesting for 2007 was not
deemed probable. Accordingly, a portion of the expense for the
2007 performance vesting portion of the awards will be accrued
throughout 2008. The value of the awards outstanding at
March 31, 2008, based on their grant date estimated
fair value, was approximately $34 million. Compensation
expense of $1 million was recognized during both the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
8
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 157 On
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
provides a definition of fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP), and requires expanded
disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard applies
when GAAP requires or allows assets or liabilities to be
measured at fair value and, therefore, does not expand the use
of fair value in any new circumstance. We adopted SFAS 157
on a prospective basis. SFAS 157 required retrospective
adoption of the rescission of Emerging Issues Task Force issue
No. 02-3,
Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held
for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading
and Risk Management Activities
(EITF 02-3),
and certain other guidance. The impact of adopting SFAS 157
and the rescission of
EITF 02-3
on January 1, 2008, was an increase to beginning
retained earnings through a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle of approximately $23 million, related
to the recognition of day-one gains on purchased mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) and certain residential loan
commitments. Refer to Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further detail.
SFAS No. 158 In September 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
(SFAS 158), which amends SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions;
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits; SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions; and SFAS No. 132(R),
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits (revised 2003). This Statement
requires companies to recognize an asset or liability for the
overfunded or underfunded status of their benefit plans in their
financial statements. The asset or liability is the offset to
accumulated other comprehensive income, consisting of previously
unrecognized prior service costs and credits, actuarial gains or
losses, and accumulated transition obligations and assets.
SFAS 158 also requires the measurement date for plan assets
and liabilities to coincide with the sponsors year-end.
The standard provides two transition alternatives for companies
to make the measurement-date provisions. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, we adopted the recognition and
disclosure elements of SFAS 158, which did not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations, or cash flows. In addition, we will adopt the
measurement elements of SFAS 158 for the year ending
December 31, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of
the measurement elements to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
SFAS No. 159 On
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits entities
to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments
and certain other items that are not currently required to be
measured at fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value for
designated items are required to be reported in earnings in the
current period. SFAS 159 also establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements for similar types of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. We elected to measure at
fair value certain financial assets and liabilities, including
certain collateralized debt obligations and certain mortgage
loans held for investment in financing securitization
structures. The cumulative effect to beginning retained earnings
was a decrease through a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle of approximately $178 million on
January 1, 2008. Refer to Note 10 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
FASB Staff Position (FSP)
FIN 39-1
On January 1, 2008, we adopted
FSP FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39.
FSP FIN 39-1
defines right of setoff and specifies what
conditions must be met for a derivative contract to qualify for
this right of setoff. It also addresses the applicability of a
right of setoff to derivative instruments and clarifies the
circumstances in which it is appropriate to offset amounts
recognized for those instruments in the statement of financial
position. In addition, this FSP permits offsetting of fair value
amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed
with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement
and fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash
collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash
collateral (a payable) arising from the same master netting
9
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
arrangement as the derivative instruments. Upon adoption of FSP
FIN 39-1, we increased December 31, 2007, other assets
and other liabilities equally by approximately $1.2 billion.
SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 109 On
January 1, 2008, we adopted Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded
at Fair Value Through Earnings (SAB 109). SAB 109
provides the SEC staffs views on the accounting for
written loan commitments recorded at fair value under GAAP and
revises and rescinds portions of SAB 105, Application of
Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB 105).
SAB 105 provided the views of the SEC staff regarding
derivative loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value
through earnings pursuant to SFAS 133. SAB 105 states
that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan
commitment, the staff believed it would be inappropriate to
incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan. SAB 109 supersedes
SAB 105 and expresses the current view of the SEC staff
that, consistent with the guidance in SFAS No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, and
SFAS 159, the expected net future cash flows related to the
associated servicing of the loan should be included in the
measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted
for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also indicated
that the SEC staff believed that internally developed intangible
assets (such as customer relationship intangible assets) should
not be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan
commitment. SAB 109 retains that SEC staff view and
broadens its application to all written loan commitments that
are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The impact of
adopting SAB 109 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 141(R) In December 2007,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which replaces FASB
Statement No. 141, Business Combinations.
SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how
an acquiring company recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree;
recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business
combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS 141(R), effective for GMAC on
January 1, 2009, applies to all transactions or other
events in which GMAC obtains control in one or more businesses.
Management will assess each transaction on a
case-by-case
basis as they occur.
SFAS No. 160 In December 2007, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of
ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which requires the
ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than
the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the
consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but
separate from the parents equity. It also requires the
amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and
to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income.
SFAS 160 will be effective for GMAC on
January 1, 2009. SFAS 160 shall be applied
prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it
is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements. The presentation and disclosure requirements shall
be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. Management
is currently assessing the retrospective impacts of adoption and
will assess new transactions as they occur.
SFAS No. 161 In March 2008, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires specific disclosures
regarding the location and amounts of derivative instruments in
the financial statements; how derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for; and how derivative instruments
and related hedged items affect the financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 will be
effective for GMAC on January 1, 2009. Early adoption
is permitted. Because SFAS 161 impacts the disclosure and
not the accounting treatment for derivative instruments and
related hedged items, the adoption of SFAS 161 will not
have an impact on our consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
10
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
FSP
FAS No. 140-3
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 140-3,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase
Financing Transactions, which provides a consistent
framework for the evaluation of a transfer of a financial asset
and subsequent repurchase agreement entered into with the same
counterparty. FSP FAS No. 140-3 provides
guidelines that must be met in order for an initial transfer and
subsequent repurchase agreement to not be considered linked for
evaluation. If the transactions do not meet the specified
criteria, they are required to be accounted for as one
transaction. This FSP will be effective for GMAC on
January 1, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively to
initial transfers and repurchase financings for which the
initial transfer is executed on or after adoption. Management is
currently assessing the impacts of adoption.
2. Other
Income
Details of other income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Gain on retirement of debt
|
|
|
$488
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Real estate services
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
Interest and service fees on transactions with GM (a)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
Interest on cash equivalents
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
Other interest revenue
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
Full-service leasing fees
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
Late charges and other administrative fees
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
Mortgage processing fees and other mortgage income
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
Interest on restricted cash deposits
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
Real estate and other investments
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Insurance service fees
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
Factoring commissions
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
Specialty lending fees
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustment on certain derivatives (b)
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value for SFAS 159 elections, net (c)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
$897
|
|
|
|
$866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Refer to Note 9 for a description of related party
transactions.
|
|
(b)
|
Refer to Note 7 for a description of derivative instruments
and hedging activities.
|
|
(c)
|
Refer to Note 10 for a description of SFAS 159 fair
value option elections.
|
11
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
3. Other
Operating Expenses
Details of other operating expenses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Insurance commissions
|
|
|
$237
|
|
|
|
$240
|
|
|
|
Technology and communications expense
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
Mortgage representation and warranty obligation
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment depreciation
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
Rent and storage
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Full-service leasing vehicle maintenance costs
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
Lease and loan administration
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Auto remarketing and repossession
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease disposal loss
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
|
$1,263
|
|
|
|
$1,246
|
|
|
|
|
4. Finance
Receivables and Loans and Loans Held for Sale
The composition of finance receivables and loans outstanding was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Total
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail automotive
|
|
|
$19,662
|
|
|
|
$26,345
|
|
|
|
$46,007
|
|
|
|
$20,030
|
|
|
|
$25,576
|
|
|
|
$45,606
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages (a)
|
|
|
27,112
|
|
|
|
7,374
|
|
|
|
34,486
|
|
|
|
34,839
|
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
42,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
46,774
|
|
|
|
33,719
|
|
|
|
80,493
|
|
|
|
54,869
|
|
|
|
32,900
|
|
|
|
87,769
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
14,529
|
|
|
|
8,940
|
|
|
|
23,469
|
|
|
|
14,689
|
|
|
|
8,272
|
|
|
|
22,961
|
|
|
|
Leasing and lease financing
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
Term loans to dealers and other
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
3,711
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
3,335
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
6,720
|
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
|
|
9,484
|
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
8,744
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction and other
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
|
|
|
27,153
|
|
|
|
14,079
|
|
|
|
41,232
|
|
|
|
26,837
|
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
39,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance receivables and loans (b)
|
|
|
$73,927
|
|
|
|
$47,798
|
|
|
|
$121,725
|
|
|
|
$81,706
|
|
|
|
$45,808
|
|
|
|
$127,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Domestic residential mortgages include $3,915 million at
fair value as a result of election made under SFAS 159.
Refer to Note 10
for additional information.
|
|
(b)
|
Net of unearned income of $4.1 billion and
$4.0 billion as of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
|
In addition to the finance receivables and loans held for
investment as summarized in the table above, we had loans held
for sale of $21.4 billion and $20.6 billion as of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively. As of March 31, 2008, loans held for
sale by our Global Automotive Finance operations were
$9.6 billion, compared to $8.5 billion as of
December 31, 2007. The increase is attributable to a
change in our funding strategy, as we have moved to an
originate-to-distribute
model. As of March 31, 2008, loans held for sale by
Residential Capital, LLC (ResCap) were $11.9 billion,
compared to $12.1 billion as of December 31, 2007.
12
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following tables present an analysis of the activity in the
allowance for credit losses on finance receivables and loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Allowance at January 1,
|
|
|
$2,141
|
|
|
|
$614
|
|
|
|
$2,755
|
|
|
|
$2,969
|
|
|
|
$607
|
|
|
|
$3,576
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
Reduction of allowance due to fair value option election (a)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impacts of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at March 31,
|
|
|
$1,760
|
|
|
|
$532
|
|
|
|
$2,292
|
|
|
|
$3,070
|
|
|
|
$663
|
|
|
|
$3,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents the reduction of allowance as a result of fair value
option election made under SFAS 159. Refer to Note 10
for
additional information.
|
5. Mortgage
Servicing Rights
The following table summarizes activity related to mortgage
servicing rights (MSRs) carried at fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value at January 1,
|
|
|
$4,703
|
|
|
|
$4,930
|
|
|
|
Additions obtained from sales of financial assets
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
Subtractions from sales of servicing assets
|
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions used in the
valuation model
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
Recognized day-one gains on previously purchased MSRs upon
adoption of SFAS 157
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in fair value
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
Other changes that affect the balance
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value at March 31,
|
|
|
$4,278
|
|
|
|
$5,108
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
we pledged MSRs of $2.7 billion as collateral for
borrowings. For a description of MSRs and the related hedging
strategy, refer to Notes 9 and 16 to our 2007 Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
13
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Changes in fair value, due to changes in valuation inputs or
assumptions used in the valuation models, include all changes
due to reevaluation by a model or by a benchmarking analysis.
This line item also includes changes in fair value resulting
from a change in valuation assumptions or model calculations or
both. Other changes in fair value primarily include the
accretion of the present value of the discount related to
forecasted cash flows and the economic run-off of the portfolio,
foreign currency translation adjustments, and the extinguishment
of MSRs related to
clean-up
calls of securitization transactions.
Key assumptions we use in valuing our MSRs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Range of prepayment speeds
|
|
0.749.6%
|
|
|
1.043.6%
|
|
|
|
Range of discount rates
|
|
4.130.5%
|
|
|
8.013.0%
|
|
|
|
|
The primary risk of our servicing rights is interest rate risk
and the resulting impact on prepayments. A significant decline
in interest rates could lead to
higher-than-expected
prepayments, which could reduce the value of the MSRs.
Historically, we have economically hedged the income statement
impact of these risks with both derivative and nonderivative
financial instruments. These instruments include interest rate
swaps, caps and floors, options to purchase these items,
futures, and forward contracts or purchasing or selling U.S.
Treasury and principal-only securities. At
March 31, 2008, the fair value of derivative financial
instruments used to mitigate these risks amounted to
$1.3 billion. There were no nonderivative instruments used
to mitigate these risks at March 31, 2008. The change
in fair value of the derivative financial instruments amounted
to a gain of $1.0 billion and a loss of $41 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and is included in servicing asset valuation and
hedge activities, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Income.
The components of servicing fees on MSRs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Contractual servicing fees, net of guarantee fees and including
subservicing
|
|
|
$329
|
|
|
|
$380
|
|
|
|
Late fees
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
Ancillary fees
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$392
|
|
|
|
$447
|
|
|
|
|
14
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
6. Debt
In the following table, we classify domestic and foreign debt on
the basis of the location of the office recording the
transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Total
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Foreign
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
$403
|
|
|
|
$1,254
|
|
|
|
$1,657
|
|
|
|
$440
|
|
|
|
$999
|
|
|
|
$1,439
|
|
|
|
Demand notes
|
|
|
5,918
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
6,096
|
|
|
|
6,382
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
6,584
|
|
|
|
Bank loans and overdrafts
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
6,669
|
|
|
|
7,214
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
6,619
|
|
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements and other (a)
|
|
|
5,969
|
|
|
|
9,402
|
|
|
|
15,371
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
10,681
|
|
|
|
18,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt
|
|
|
12,835
|
|
|
|
17,503
|
|
|
|
30,338
|
|
|
|
15,305
|
|
|
|
18,501
|
|
|
|
33,806
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
|
25,186
|
|
|
|
13,492
|
|
|
|
38,678
|
|
|
|
23,356
|
|
|
|
14,173
|
|
|
|
37,529
|
|
|
|
Due after one year
|
|
|
91,234
|
|
|
|
23,864
|
|
|
|
115,098
|
|
|
|
95,833
|
|
|
|
25,409
|
|
|
|
121,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt (b)
|
|
|
116,420
|
|
|
|
37,356
|
|
|
|
153,776
|
|
|
|
119,189
|
|
|
|
39,582
|
|
|
|
158,771
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustment (c)
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
$130,447
|
|
|
|
$54,847
|
|
|
|
$185,294
|
|
|
|
$135,086
|
|
|
|
$58,062
|
|
|
|
$193,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Repurchase agreements consist of secured financing arrangements
with third parties at ResCap. Other primarily includes nonbank
secured borrowings, as well as notes payable to GM. Refer to
Note 9 for additional information.
|
|
(b)
|
Domestic long-term debt includes $4,299 million at fair
value as a result of election made under SFAS 159. Refer to
Note 10 for additional information.
|
|
(c)
|
To adjust designated fixed-rate debt to fair value in accordance
with SFAS 133.
|
The following summarizes assets restricted as collateral for the
payment of the related debt obligations primarily arising from
securitization transactions accounted for as secured borrowings
and repurchase agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
secured
|
|
|
|
secured
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Assets
|
|
debt (a)
|
|
Assets
|
|
debt (a)
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
$9,135
|
|
|
|
$5,154
|
|
|
|
$10,437
|
|
|
|
$6,765
|
|
|
|
Mortgage assets held for investment and lending receivables
|
|
|
39,237
|
|
|
|
25,720
|
|
|
|
45,534
|
|
|
|
33,911
|
|
|
|
Retail automotive finance receivables
|
|
|
24,720
|
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
|
|
23,079
|
|
|
|
19,094
|
|
|
|
Commercial automotive finance receivables
|
|
|
11,522
|
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
|
|
10,092
|
|
|
|
7,709
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
|
24,440
|
|
|
|
19,470
|
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
|
|
17,926
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments and other assets
|
|
|
13,722
|
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
|
14,429
|
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$123,245
|
|
|
|
$85,470
|
|
|
|
$124,558
|
|
|
|
$90,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Included as part of secured debt are repurchase agreements of
$2.7 billion and $3.6 billion where we have pledged
assets as collateral for approximately the same amount of debt
at March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
|
15
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Liquidity
Facilities
Liquidity facilities represent additional funding sources. The
financial institutions providing the uncommitted facilities are
not legally obligated to advance funds under them. The following
table summarizes the liquidity facilities that we maintain. The
unused capacity on these facilities can be accessed upon the
pledge of available eligible assets or future acquisition of
assets meeting the eligibility requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capacity
|
|
Unused capacity
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Committed unsecured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
$8.9
|
|
|
|
$8.9
|
|
|
|
$6.9
|
|
|
|
$7.0
|
|
|
|
$2.0
|
|
|
|
$1.9
|
|
|
|
ResCap
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
80.8
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
ResCap
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total committed facilities
|
|
|
142.1
|
|
|
|
153.9
|
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
|
|
60.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted unsecured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
ResCap
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ResCap
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total uncommitted facilities
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$173.3
|
|
|
|
$186.0
|
|
|
|
$91.9
|
|
|
|
$104.4
|
|
|
|
$81.4
|
|
|
|
$81.6
|
|
|
|
|
7. Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
We enter into interest rate and foreign-currency futures,
forwards, options, and swaps in connection with our market risk
management activities. In accordance with SFAS 133, as
amended, we record derivative financial instruments on the
balance sheet as assets or liabilities at fair value. Changes in
fair value are accounted for depending on the use of the
derivative financial instrument and whether it is part of a
qualifying hedge accounting relationship.
Effective May 1, 2007, we designated certain interest
rate swaps as fair value hedges of callable fixed-rate debt
instruments funding our North American Automotive Finance
operations. Prior to May 1, 2007, these swaps were
economic hedges of this callable fixed-rate debt. Effectiveness
of these hedges is assessed using regression of thirty quarterly
data points for each relationship, the results of which must
meet thresholds for R-squared, slope, F-statistic, and
T-statistic. Any ineffectiveness measured in these relationships
is recorded in earnings.
16
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table summarizes the pretax earnings effect for
each type of hedge classification, segregated by the asset or
liability being hedged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Income statement classification
|
|
Fair value hedge ineffectiveness gain (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt obligations
|
|
|
$34
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Loss on mortgage and automotive loans, net
|
Economic hedge change in fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet securitization activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Other income
|
Foreign-currency debt (a)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Loans held for sale or investment
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
Loss on mortgage and automotive loans, net
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
Servicing asset valuation and hedge activities, net
|
Mortgage related securities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
Investment income
|
Callable debt obligations
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Other
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Other income, Interest expense, Other operating expenses
|
|
|
Net gains (losses)
|
|
|
$1,295
|
|
|
|
($30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amount represents the difference between the changes in the fair
values of the currency swap, net of the revaluation of the
related foreign-denominated debt.
|
8. Income
Taxes
Effective November 28, 2006, GMAC along with certain
U.S. subsidiaries, became pass-through entities for U.S. federal
income tax purposes (Pass-through entities). Subsequent to
November 28, 2006, U.S. federal, state, and local
income tax expense has generally not been incurred by these
entities as they ceased to be taxable entities in all but a few
local tax jurisdictions that continue to tax LLCs or
partnerships. Our banking, insurance, and foreign subsidiaries
are generally taxable corporations and continue to be subject to
U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign income taxes (Taxable
entities). The income tax expense or benefit related to the
Taxable entities along with other miscellaneous state, local,
and franchise taxes are included in our income tax expense in
the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate
to our effective income tax rate is shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Statutory U.S. federal tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
Change in tax rate resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
Foreign income tax rate differential
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
Effect of valuation allowance change
|
|
|
(38.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLC income (loss) not subject to federal or state income taxes
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
(148.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(97.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
17
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Our results segregated by tax status are provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
entities
|
|
entities
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
entities
|
|
entities
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
$122
|
|
|
|
($693
|
)
|
|
|
($571
|
)
|
|
|
($604
|
)
|
|
|
$449
|
|
|
|
($155
|
)
|
|
|
Tax expense
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$126
|
|
|
|
($715
|
)
|
|
|
($589
|
)
|
|
|
($602
|
)
|
|
|
$297
|
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
|
|
(97.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
The effective rate of our Taxable entities was significantly
lower for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007. Our consolidated tax
expense decreased 88% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
This was primarily due to higher current period losses in
ResCaps international operations for which no tax benefit
was recorded and new valuation allowances that were established
with respect to prior year losses.
Gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $157 million and
$155 million as of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Also included in
other liabilities as of March 31, 2008, was
$257 million related to additional uncertain tax positions,
which were classified as deferred tax liabilities as of
December 31, 2007.
18
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
9. Related
Party Transactions
Balance
Sheet
A summary of the balance sheet effect of transactions with GM,
FIM Holdings, and affiliated companies follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
investment in asset-backed security (a)
|
|
|
$35
|
|
|
|
$35
|
|
Finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale auto financing (b)
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Term loans to dealers (b)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Lending receivables (c)
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net (d)
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
Notes receivable from GM (e)
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subvention receivables (rate and residual support)
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
Lease pull-ahead receivable
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Other
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to GM
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale payable
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
Other payables
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to members (f)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred interests (g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Conversion of preferred membership interests (g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
Capital contributions received (h)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
Preferred interest dividends
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
In November 2006, GMAC retained an investment in a note secured
by operating lease assets transferred to GM. As part of the
transfer, GMAC provided a note to a trust, a wholly owned
subsidiary of GM. The note is classified in investment
securities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
(b)
|
Represents wholesale financing and term loans to certain
dealerships wholly owned by GM or in which GM has an interest.
|
|
(c)
|
Primarily represents loans with various affiliates of
FIM Holdings.
|
|
(d)
|
Includes vehicles, buildings, and other equipment classified as
operating lease assets that are leased to GM-affiliated and
FIM Holdings-affiliated entities.
|
|
(e)
|
Represents wholesale financing we provide to GM for vehicles,
parts, and accessories in which GM retains title while consigned
to us or dealers in the UK, Italy, and Germany. The financing to
GM remains outstanding until the title is transferred to the
dealers. The amount of financing provided to GM under this
arrangement varies based on inventory levels.
|
|
(f)
|
Represents state withholding tax payments made on behalf of
members during the first quarter of 2008.
|
|
(g)
|
During the fourth quarter of 2007, GM and FIM Holdings
converted $1.1 billion of preferred membership interest
into common equity interests. Refer to Note 1 to our 2007
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for further discussion.
|
|
(h)
|
During the first quarter of 2007, under the terms of the Sale
Transactions, GM made a capital contribution of $1 billion
to GMAC.
|
19
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Income
Statement
A summary of the income statement effect of transactions with
GM, FIM Holdings, and affiliated companies follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM and affiliates lease residual value support (a)
|
|
|
$364
|
|
|
|
$219
|
|
|
|
GM and affiliates lease rate support
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
Wholesale subvention and service fees from GM
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
Interest (paid) received on loans with GM
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Interest on loans with FIM Holdings affiliates
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Consumer lease payments from GM (b)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums earned from GM
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
Other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on notes receivable from GM and affiliates
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
Interest on wholesale settlements (c)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
Revenues from GM leased properties, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (d)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fee income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Automotive operating leases (e)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee retirement plan costs allocated by GM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Off-lease vehicle selling expense reimbursement (f)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
Payments to GM for services, rent, and marketing expenses (g)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents total amount of residual support and risk sharing
earned under the residual support and risk-sharing programs and
earned revenue (previously deferred) related to the settlement
of residual support and risk-sharing obligations in 2006 for a
portion of the lease portfolio.
|
|
(b)
|
GM sponsors lease pull-ahead programs whereby consumers are
encouraged to terminate lease contracts early in conjunction
with the acquisition of a new GM vehicle, with the
customers remaining payment obligation waived. For certain
programs, GM compensates us for the waived payments, adjusted
based on the remarketing results associated with the underlying
vehicle.
|
|
(c)
|
The settlement terms related to the wholesale financing of
certain GM products are at shipment date. To the extent that
wholesale settlements with GM are made before the expiration of
transit, we receive interest from GM.
|
|
(d)
|
Represents income related to derivative transactions that we
enter into with GM as counterparty.
|
|
(e)
|
Represents servicing income related to automotive leases
distributed to GM on November 22, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
An agreement with GM provides for the reimbursement of certain
selling expenses incurred by us on off-lease vehicles sold by GM
at auction.
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
We reimburse GM for certain services provided to us. This amount
includes rental payments for our primary executive and
administrative offices located in the Renaissance Center in
Detroit, Michigan, as well as exclusivity and royalty fees.
|
Retail
and Lease Programs
GM may elect to sponsor incentive programs (on both retail
contracts and operating leases) by supporting financing rates
below the standard market rates at which we purchase retail
contracts and leases. These marketing incentives are also
referred to as rate support or subvention. When GM utilizes
these marketing incentives, it pays us the present value of the
difference between the customer rate and our standard rate at
contract inception, which we defer and recognize as a yield
adjustment over the life of the contract.
GM may also sponsor lease residual support programs as a way to
lower customer monthly payments. Under residual support
programs, the customers contractual residual value is
adjusted above our standard residual values. Historically, GM
reimbursed us at the time of the vehicles disposal if
remarketing sales
20
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
proceeds were less than the customers contractual residual
value limited to our standard residual value. In addition to
residual support programs, GM also participated in a
risk-sharing arrangement whereby GM shared equally in residual
losses to the extent that remarketing proceeds were below our
standard residual values (limited to a floor).
In connection with the Sale Transactions, GM settled its
estimated liabilities with respect to residual support and risk
sharing on a portion of our operating lease portfolio and on the
entire U.S. balloon retail receivables portfolio in a series of
lump-sum payments. A negotiated amount totaling approximately
$1.4 billion was agreed to by GM under these leases and
balloon contracts and was paid to us. The payments were recorded
as a deferred amount in accrued expenses and other liabilities
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. As these contracts
terminate and the vehicles are sold at auction, the payments are
treated as a component of sales proceeds in recognizing the gain
or loss on sale of the underlying assets. As of
March 31, 2008, the remaining deferred amount is
$564 million.
In addition, with regard to U.S. lease originations and all U.S.
balloon retail contract originations occurring after
April 30, 2006, that remained with us after the
consummation of the Sale Transactions, GM agreed to begin
payment of the present value of the expected residual support
owed to us at the time of contract origination as opposed to
after contract termination at the time of sale of the related
vehicle. The residual support amount GM actually owes us is
finalized as the leases actually terminate. Under the terms of
the residual support program, in cases where the estimate was
incorrect, GM may be obligated to pay us, or we may be obligated
to reimburse GM. For the affected contracts originated during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, GM paid or
agreed to pay us a total of $245 million.
Based on the March 31, 2008, outstanding U.S.
operating lease portfolio, the additional maximum amount that
could be paid by GM under the residual support programs is
approximately $1.25 billion and would only be paid in the
unlikely event that the proceeds from the entire portfolio of
lease assets were lower than both the contractual residual value
and our standard residual rates. Based on the
March 31, 2008, outstanding U.S. operating lease
portfolio, the maximum amount that could be paid under the
risk-sharing arrangements is approximately $1.3 billion and
would only be paid in the unlikely event that the proceeds from
all outstanding lease vehicles were lower than our standard
residual rates.
Retail and lease contracts acquired by us that included rate and
residual subvention from GM, payable directly or indirectly to
GM dealers as a percent of total new retail and lease contracts
acquired, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
GM and affiliates subvented contracts acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American operations
|
|
82%
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
International operations
|
|
42%
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
Other
We have entered into various services agreements with GM that
are designed to document and maintain our current and historical
relationship. We are required to pay GM fees in connection with
certain of these agreements related to our financing of GM
consumers and dealers in certain parts of the world.
GM also provides payment guarantees on certain commercial assets
we have outstanding with certain third-party customers. As of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
commercial obligations guaranteed by GM were $126 million
and $107 million, respectively. In addition, we have a
consignment arrangement with GM for commercial inventories in
Europe. As of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, commercial inventories related to
this arrangement were $128 million and $90 million,
respectively, and are reflected in other assets on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
21
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
10. Fair
Value
Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157)
We adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, which
provides a definition of fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and requires expanded disclosures about
fair value measurements. The standard applies when GAAP requires
or allows assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and
therefore, does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstance.
SFAS 157 nullified guidance in EITF 02-3. EITF
02-3
required the deferral of day-one gains on derivative contracts,
unless the fair value of the derivative contracts were supported
by quoted market prices or similar current market transactions.
In accordance with EITF
02-3, we
previously deferred day-one gains on purchased MSRs and certain
residential loan commitments. When SFAS 157 was adopted,
the day-one gains previously deferred under
EITF 02-3
were recognized as a cumulative effect adjustment that increased
beginning retained earnings by $23 million.
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value should
be based on the assumptions market participants would use when
pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those
assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices available in active markets (i.e., observable
inputs) and the lowest priority to data lacking transparency
(i.e., unobservable inputs). Additionally, SFAS 157
requires an entity to consider all aspects of nonperformance
risk, including the entitys own credit standing, when
measuring fair value of a liability. We consider our credit risk
and the credit risk of our counterparties on the valuation of
derivative instruments through a credit valuation adjustment
(CVA). The CVA calculation utilizes our credit default swap
spreads and the spreads of the counterparty relative to a
generic AA-rated counterparty. In situations where our net
position with a counterparty is a liability, our credit default
spread is used to calculate the required adjustment. In net
asset positions, the counterpartys credit default spread
is used. In light of our current credit rating, our net
liability positions were reduced to reflect the markets
view of our increased probability of default relative to an AA
counterparty. As most of our counterparties credit default
spreads are similar to the generic AA counterparty, our net
asset positions were reduced in only a limited number of
situations.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-level hierarchy to be used
when measuring and disclosing fair value. An instruments
categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of significant input to its valuation. Following is
a description of the three hierarchy levels:
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical asset
or liabilities as of the measurement date. Additionally, the
entity must have the ability to access the active market and the
quoted prices cannot be adjusted by the entity.
|
|
|
Level 2
|
Inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in
active markets for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices
in inactive markets for identical or similar assets or
liabilities; or inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other
means for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs are supported by little or no market
activity. The unobservable inputs represent managements
best assumptions of how market participants would price the
assets and liabilities. Generally, Level 3 assets and
liabilities are valued using pricing models, discounted cash
flow methodologies, or similar techniques that require
significant judgment or estimation.
|
22
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies used
to measure material assets and liabilities at fair value and
details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models, and
significant assumptions utilized.
Available-for-sale
securities
Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value, which is primarily based
on observable market prices. If observable market prices are not
available, our valuations are based on internally developed
discounted cash flow models that use a market-based discount
rate and consider recent market transactions, experience with
similar securities, current business conditions, and analysis of
the underlying collateral, as available. In order to estimate
cash flows, we are required to utilize various significant
assumptions including market observable inputs such as forward
interest rates, as well as internally developed inputs including
prepayment speeds, delinquency levels, and credit losses. We
classified 10% of the
available-for-sale
securities reported at fair value as Level 3.
Available-for-sale
securities account for 31% of all assets reported at fair value
at March 31, 2008.
Trading securities Trading securities are
recorded at fair value and include retained interests in assets
sold through off-balance sheet securitizations and purchased
securities. The securities may be asset-backed or asset-related
asset-backed securities (including senior and subordinated
interests), interest-only, principal-only, or residual interests
and may be investment grade, noninvestment grade, or unrated
securities. We base our valuation of trading securities on
observable market prices when available; however, observable
market prices are not available for a significant portion of
these assets due to illiquidity in the markets. When observable
market prices are not available, valuations are primarily based
on internally developed discounted cash flow models that use a
market-based discount rate. The valuation considers recent
market transactions, experience with similar securities, current
business conditions, and analysis of the underlying collateral,
as available. In order to estimate cash flows, we utilize
various significant assumptions including market observable
inputs such as forward interest rates, as well as internally
developed inputs such as, prepayment speeds, delinquency levels,
and credit losses. We classified 94% of the trading securities
reported at fair value as Level 3. Trading securities
account for 6% of all assets reported at fair value at
March 31, 2008.
Loans held for sale The entire loans held for
sale portfolio is accounted for at the lower of cost or fair
value, as required under GAAP. Only loans that are currently
being carried at fair value are included within the nonrecurring
fair value measurement tables. We classified 13% of the loans
held for sale reported at fair value as Level 3. Loans held
for sale account for 22% of all assets reported at fair value at
March 31, 2008.
Approximately 98% of the total loans carried at fair value are
mortgage loans. We originate or purchase mortgage loans in the
United States that we intend to sell to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac,
and Ginnie Mae (collectively, the Agencies). Additionally, we
originate or purchase mortgage loans both domestically and
internationally that we intend to sell into the secondary
markets via whole-loan sale or securitization.
Loans held for sale are typically pooled together and sold into
certain exit markets, depending upon underlying attributes of
the loan, such as agency eligibility (domestic only), product
type, interest rate, and credit quality. Two valuation
methodologies are used to determine the fair value of loans held
for sale. The methodology used depends on the exit market as
described below.
Loans valued using observable market prices for identical or
similar assets This includes all domestic loans
that can be sold to the Agencies, which are valued predominantly
by published forward agency prices. This will also include all
nonagency domestic loans or international loans where recently
negotiated market prices for the loan pool exist with a
counterparty (which approximates fair value) or quoted market
prices for similar loans are available. As these valuations are
derived from quoted market prices, we classify these valuations
as Level 2 in the fair value disclosures. As of
March 31, 2008, 88% of the mortgage loans held for
sale that are currently being carried at fair value are
classified as Level 2.
23
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Loans valued using internal models To the
extent observable market prices are not available, we will
determine the fair value of loans held for sale using internally
developed valuation models. These valuation models estimate the
exit price we expect to receive in the loans principal
market, which depending upon characteristics of the loan, may be
the whole-loan or securitization market. Although we utilize and
give priority to market observable inputs such as interest rates
and market spreads within these models, we are typically
required to utilize internal inputs, such as prepayment speeds,
credit losses, and discount rates. Accordingly, we classify
these valuations as Level 3 in the fair value disclosures.
As of March 31, 2008, 12% of the mortgage loans held
for sale that are currently being carried at fair value are
classified as Level 3.
Due to limited sales activity and periodically unobservable
prices in certain markets, certain loans held for sale may
transfer between Level 2 and Level 3 in future periods.
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned
income Under SFAS 159, we elected the fair
value option for certain mortgage loans held for investment. The
elected loans collateralized on-balance sheet securitization
debt in which we estimated credit reserves pertaining to
securitized assets that could, or already had, exceeded our
economic exposure. The elected loans represent a portion of the
consumer finance receivable and loans on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The balance that was not elected
under SFAS 159 was reported on the balance sheet at the
principal amount outstanding, net of charge-offs, allowance for
loan losses, and net deferred loan fees.
The mortgage loans held for investment that collateralized
securitization debt were legally isolated from us and are beyond
the reach of our creditors. The loans are measured at fair value
using a portfolio approach or an in-use premise. The objective
in fair valuing the loans and related securitization debt is to
properly account for our retained economic interest in the
securitizations. As a result of reduced liquidity in capital
markets, values of both these loans and the securitized bonds
are expected to be volatile.
Since this approach involves the use of significant unobservable
inputs, we classified all the mortgage loans held for investment
elected under SFAS 159 as Level 3. As of
March 31, 2008, 94% of all consumer finance
receivables and loans reported at fair value are classified as
Level 3. Consumer finance receivables and loans account for
10% of all assets reported at fair value at
March 31, 2008. Refer to the section within this note
titled Fair Value Option of Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159) for additional information.
Mortgage servicing rights We typically retain
MSRs when we sell assets into the secondary market. MSRs do not
trade in an active market with observable prices. Therefore, we
use internally developed discounted cash flow models to estimate
the fair value of MSRs and have classified all MSRs as
Level 3. These internal valuation models estimate net cash
flows based on internal operating assumptions that we believe
would be used by market participants, combined with market-based
assumptions for loan prepayment rates, interest rates, and
discount rates that we believe approximate yields required by
investors in this asset. Cash flows primarily include servicing
fees, float income, and late fees, in each case less operating
costs to service the loans. The estimated cash flows are
discounted using an option-adjusted spread derived discount
rate. All MSRs are classified as Level 3 at
March 31, 2008. MSRs account for 11% of all assets
reported at fair value at March 31, 2008.
Derivative instruments We enter into a
variety of derivative financial instruments as part of our
hedging strategies. Certain of these derivatives are exchange
traded, such as Eurodollar futures, or traded within highly
active dealer markets, such as agency to-be-announced
securities. In order to fair value these instruments, we utilize
the exchange price or dealer market price for the particular
derivative contract; therefore, these contracts are classified
as Level 1.
We also execute over-the-counter derivative contracts, such as
interest rate swaps, floors, caps, corridors, and swaptions. We
utilize third-party developed valuation models that are widely
accepted in the market to value these over-the-counter
derivative contracts. The specific terms of the contract are
24
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
entered into the model, as well as market observable inputs such
as interest rate forward curves and interpolated volatility
assumptions. As all significant inputs into these models are
market observable, these over-the-counter derivative contracts
are classified as Level 2 at March 31, 2008. We
classified 83% of the derivative assets and 37% of the
derivative liabilities reported at fair value as Level 2 at
March 31, 2008.
We also hold certain derivative contracts that are structured
specifically to meet a particular hedging objective. These
derivative contracts often are utilized to hedge risks inherent
within certain of the on-balance sheet securitizations. In order
to hedge risks on particular bond classes or securitization
collateral, the derivatives notional amount is often
indexed to the hedged item. As a result, we typically are
required to use internally developed prepayment assumptions as
an input into the model, in order to forecast future notional
amounts on these structured derivative contracts. Accordingly,
these derivative contracts were classified as Level 3. We
classified 13% of the derivative assets and 35% of the
derivative liabilities reported at fair value as Level 3 at
March 31, 2008.
Derivative assets account for 16% of all assets reported at fair
value at March 31, 2008. Derivative liabilities
account for 32% of all liabilities reported at fair value at
March 31, 2008.
Repossessed and foreclosed assets Foreclosed
upon or repossessed assets resulting from loan defaults are
carried at the lower of either cost or fair value less costs to
sell and are included in other assets on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet. Only assets that are being carried
at fair value less costs to sell are included in the fair value
disclosures.
The majority of assets acquired due to default are foreclosed
assets. We revalue foreclosed assets on a periodic basis.
Properties that are valued based upon independent third-party
appraisals less costs to sell are classified as Level 2.
When third-party appraisals are not obtained, valuations are
typically obtained from third-party broker price opinion;
however, depending on the circumstances, the property list price
or other sales price information may be used in lieu of a broker
price opinion. Based on historical experience, these values are
adjusted downward to take into account damage and other factors
that typically cause the actual liquidation value of foreclosed
properties to be less than broker price opinion or other price
sources. This valuation adjustment is necessary to ensure the
valuation ascribed to these assets considers unique factors and
circumstances surrounding the foreclosed asset. As a result of
applying internally developed adjustments to the third-party
provided valuation of the foreclosed property, these assets are
classified as Level 3 in the fair value disclosures. As of
March 31, 2008, 35% and 65% of foreclosed and repossessed
properties carried at fair value less costs to sell are
classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively.
On-balance sheet securitization debt Under
SFAS 159, we elected the fair value option for certain
mortgage loans held for investment and on-balance sheet
securitization debt. In particular, we elected the fair value
option on securitized debt issued by domestic on-balance sheet
securitization vehicles in which we estimated credit reserves
pertaining to securitized assets could, or already had, exceeded
our economic exposure. The objective in measuring the loans and
related securitization debt at fair value was to approximate our
retained economic interest and economic exposure to the
collateral securing the securitization debt. The remaining
on-balance sheet securitization debt that was not elected under
SFAS 159 is reported on the balance sheet at cost, net of
premium or discounts and issuance costs.
We value securitization debt that was elected pursuant to the
fair value option, as well as, any economically retained
positions, using market observables prices whenever possible.
The securitization debt is principally in the form of
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities collateralized by
the underlying mortgage loans held for investment. Due to the
attributes of the underlying collateral and current market
conditions, observable prices for these instruments are
typically not available in active markets. In these situations,
we considered observed transactions as Level 2 inputs in
our discounted cash flow models. Additionally, the discounted
cash flow models utilize other market observable inputs such as
25
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
prepayment speeds, credit losses, and discount rates. Fair value
option elected financing securitization debt is classified as
Level 3 as a result of the reliance on significant
assumptions and estimates for model inputs. On-balance sheet
securitization debt accounts for 63% of all liabilities reported
at fair value at March 31, 2008. As a result of
reduced liquidity in capital markets, values of both the elected
loans and the securitized debt are expected to be volatile. A
complete description of the securitizations is provided within
this note titled Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159).
Collateralized Debt Obligations We elected
the fair value option for all collateralized debt obligations
(CDOs). CDOs are collateralized by trading securities, which are
carried at fair value. Due to the availability of market
information on the CDO collateral, we derive the fair value of
CDO debt using the CDO collateral fair value and adjust
accordingly for any retained economic positions. While a portion
of the CDO collateral may utilize market observable prices for
valuation purposes, the majority of the CDO collateral is valued
using valuation models that utilize significant internal inputs.
Further, the retained economic positions also use valuation
models that utilize significant internal inputs. As a result,
CDO debt is classified as Level 3. CDOs account for 5% of
all liabilities reported at fair value at
March 31, 2008. Refer to the section within this note
titled, Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159), for a complete description of
the CDOs.
Recurring
Fair Value
The following table displays the assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial
instruments elected for the fair value option under
SFAS 159. We often economically hedge the fair value change
of our assets or liabilities with derivatives and other
financial instruments. The table below displays the hedges
separately from the hedged items and, therefore, does not
directly display the impact of our risk management activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Recurring fair value
measures
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
$2,153
|
|
|
|
$9,014
|
|
|
|
$1,195
|
|
|
|
$12,362
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,915
|
|
|
|
3,915
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash reserve deposits held for securitization trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets (liabilities), net (b)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
4,732
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash collections for securitization trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$1,813
|
|
|
|
$13,870
|
|
|
|
$11,849
|
|
|
|
$27,532
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet securitization debt (a)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
($3,996
|
)
|
|
|
($3,996
|
)
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
($11
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
($4,299
|
)
|
|
|
($4,310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Carried at fair value due to fair value option election under
SFAS 159.
|
|
(b)
|
At March 31, 2008, derivative assets within
Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 were
$241 million, $5,478 million, and $876 million,
respectively. Additionally, derivative liabilities within
Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 were
$583 million, $746 million, and
$704 million, respectively.
|
26
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table presents a reconciliation for all
Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. We often economically hedge the fair value
change of our assets or liabilities with derivatives and other
financial instruments. The Level 3 items presented below
may be hedged by derivatives and other financial instruments
that are classified as Level 1 or Level 2. Thus, the
table below does not fully reflect the impact of our risk
management activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 recurring fair value measurements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized/
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
earnings still
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
in other
|
|
Purchases, sales,
|
|
as of
|
|
held as of
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
Included in
|
|
comprehensive
|
|
issuances, and
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
earnings
|
|
income
|
|
settlements
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
$1,249
|
|
|
|
($33
|
) (b)
|
|
|
$7
|
|
|
|
($28
|
)
|
|
|
$1,195
|
|
|
|
($25
|
) (b)
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
(424
|
) (c)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
(521
|
) (c)
|
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
(a)
|
|
|
6,684
|
|
|
|
(2,003
|
) (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
3,915
|
|
|
|
(2,274
|
) (d)
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
4,713
|
|
|
|
(646
|
) (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
(630
|
) (e)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash reserve deposits held for securitization trusts
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
8
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
8
|
(c)
|
Fair value of derivative contracts in receivable position, net
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
(f)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
197
|
(f)
|
Restricted cash collections for securitization trusts
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(3
|
) (g)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(3
|
) (g)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$15,467
|
|
|
|
($2,922
|
)
|
|
|
$13
|
|
|
|
($709
|
)
|
|
|
$11,849
|
|
|
|
($3,248
|
)
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet securitization debt (a)
|
|
|
($6,734
|
)
|
|
|
$2,033
|
(h)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$705
|
|
|
|
($3,996
|
)
|
|
|
$2,149
|
(h)
|
Collateralized debt obligations (a)
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
) (c)
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
($7,085
|
)
|
|
|
$2,054
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$732
|
|
|
|
($4,299
|
)
|
|
|
$2,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Carried at fair value due to fair
value option election under SFAS 159.
|
|
(b)
|
Reported within other income in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
|
(c)
|
Reported within investment income
in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
|
(d)
|
The fair value adjustment is
reported within other income and the related interest is
reported within consumer financing revenue in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
|
(e)
|
Reported within servicing asset
valuation and hedge activities, net in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
Derivative instruments relating to
risks associated with debt are reported within interest expense
in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, while
derivatives relating to risks associated with mortgage loans
held for sale are reported as investment income. The remaining
derivative earnings are reported as other income in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
Reported within other operating
expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
|
|
(h)
|
The fair value adjustment is
reported within other income and the related interest is
reported within interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Income.
|
27
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
Nonrecurring
Fair Value
We may be required to measure certain assets and liabilities at
fair value from
time-to-time.
These periodic fair value measures typically result from the
application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or certain
impairment measures under GAAP. These items would constitute
nonrecurring fair value measures under SFAS 157.
The following table displays the assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower of cost or
|
|
(losses) included
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Nonrecurring fair value
measures
|
|
fair value or
|
|
in earnings for the
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
|
credit allowance
|
|
three months
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale (a)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$7,784
|
|
|
|
$1,201
|
|
|
|
$8,985
|
|
|
|
($1,368
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
(g)
|
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
(g)
|
Commercial finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
(g)
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and other investments (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
(f)
|
|
|
($3
|
)
|
Repossessed and foreclosed assets, net (e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
(g)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$8,690
|
|
|
|
$2,003
|
|
|
|
$10,693
|
|
|
|
($1,875
|
)
|
|
|
($3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents loans held for sale that are required to be measured
at lower of cost or fair value in accordance with
SFAS No. 65, Accounting for Certain Mortgage
Banking Activities or
(SOP 01-6,
Accounting by Certain Entities (Including Entities With Trade
Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of
Others. Only loans with fair values below cost are included
in the table above. The related valuation allowance represents
the cumulative adjustment to fair value of those specific loans.
|
|
(b)
|
Includes only receivables with a specific reserve established
using the fair value of the underlying collateral. The related
credit allowance represents the cumulative adjustment to fair
value of those specific receivables.
|
|
(c)
|
Represents the portion of the commercial portfolio impaired as
of March 31, 2008, under SFAS No. 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. The
related credit allowance represents the cumulative adjustment to
fair value of those specific receivables.
|
|
(d)
|
Represents assets impaired under SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Asset. The total loss included in earnings for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, represents the fair
market value adjustments on the portfolio.
|
|
(e)
|
The allowance provided for repossessed and foreclosed assets
represents any cumulative valuation adjustment recognized to
adjust the assets to fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
The total loss included in earnings is the most relevant
indicator of the impact on earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
We consider the applicable valuation or credit loss allowance to
be the most relevant indicator of the impact on earnings caused
by the fair value measurement. The carrying values are inclusive
of the respective valuation or credit loss allowance.
|
Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159)
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 159,
which permits entities to choose to measure at fair value many
financial instruments and certain other items that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value. Subsequent
changes in fair value for designated items are required to be
reported in earnings in the current period. SFAS 159 also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements for similar
types of assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
We elected to measure at fair value certain financial assets and
liabilities held by our ResCap operations including certain
collateralized debt obligations and certain mortgage loans held
for investment and related debt held in financing securitization
structures that existed as of adoption. Our intent in electing
fair value for these items was to mitigate a divergence between
accounting losses and economic exposure for certain assets and
liabilities as described in the paragraphs following the table
below. The cumulative effect to retained earnings for these fair
value elections was a decrease of $178 million on
January 1, 2008.
28
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table represents the carrying value of the
affected instruments before and after the changes in accounting
related to the adoption of SFAS 159.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
carrying value
|
|
retained earnings
|
|
carrying value
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
before adoption
|
|
gain (loss)
|
|
after adoption
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
(a)
|
|
|
$10,531
|
|
|
|
($3,847
|
)
|
|
|
$6,684
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet securitization debt
|
|
|
($10,367
|
)
|
|
|
$3,633
|
|
|
|
($6,734
|
)
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes the removal from the balance sheet of the
$489 million of allowance for loan losses.
|
On-balance
Sheet Securitizations
In prior years, ResCap executed certain domestic securitizations
that did not meet sale criteria under SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishment of Liabilities (SFAS 140). As part
of these domestic on-balance sheet securitizations, we typically
retained the economic residual interest in the securitization.
The economic residual entitles us to excess cash flows that
remain at each distribution date after absorbing any credit
losses in the securitization. Because sale treatment was not
achieved under SFAS 140, the mortgage loan collateral
remained on the balance sheet and was classified as consumer
finance receivable and loans, the securitizations debt was
classified as secured debt, and the economic residuals were not
carried on the balance sheet. After execution of the
securitizations, we were required under GAAP to continue
recording an allowance for credit losses on these held for
investment loans.
As a result of market conditions and deteriorating credit
performance during 2007, economic exposure on certain of these
domestic on-balance sheet securitizations were reduced to zero
or approximating zero, thus indicating we expected minimal to no
future cash flows to be received on the economic residual. While
we no longer were economically exposed to credit losses in the
securitizations, we were required to continue recording
additional allowance for credit losses on the securitization
collateral as credit performance deteriorated. Further, in
accordance with GAAP we did not record any offsetting reduction
in the securitizations debt balances, even though any
nonperformance of the assets will ultimately pass through as a
reduction of the amount owed to the debt holders, once they are
contractually extinguished. As a result, we were required to
record accounting losses beyond our economic exposure.
In order to mitigate the divergence between accounting losses
and economic exposure, we elected the fair value option for a
portion of the domestic on-balance sheet securitizations on
January 1, 2008. In particular, we elected the fair
value option for domestic on-balance sheet securitization
vehicles in which we estimated that the credit reserves
pertaining to securitized assets could, or already had, exceeded
our economic exposure. The fair value option election was made
at a securitization level; thus the election was made for both
the mortgage loans held for investment and the related portion
of on-balance sheet securitized debt for these particular
securitizations.
29
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
As part of the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159, we
removed various items that were previously included in the
carrying value of the respective consumer loans and on-balance
sheet securitization debt. We removed $489 million of
allowance for credit losses and other net deferred and upfront
costs included in the carrying value of the fair value-elected
loans and debt. The removal of these items, as well as the
adjustment required in order to have the items carrying
value equal fair value at January 1, 2008, resulted in
a $3.8 billion decrease recorded to beginning retained
earnings for the fair value-elected loans held for investment,
offset by a $3.6 billion gain related to the elected
on-balance sheet securitization debt. These fair value option
elections did not have a material impact on our deferred tax
balances.
Subsequent to the fair value election for loans held for
investment, we continued to carry the fair value-elected loans
within consumer finance receivable and loans, net of unearned
income, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We no
longer record allowance for credit losses on these fair
value-elected loans, and amortization of net deferred costs/fees
no longer occurs, because the deferred amounts were removed as
part of the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159. Our
policy is to separately record interest income on the fair
value-elected loans (unless the loans are placed on nonaccrual
status when they are 60 days past due); these amounts
continue be classified within consumer financing revenue in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. The fair value
adjustment recorded for the loans are classified as other income
in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
Subsequent to the fair value election for the respective
on-balance sheet securitization debt, we no longer amortize
upfront deal costs on the fair value-elected securitization
debt, since these deferred amounts were removed as part of the
cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159. The fair
value-elected debt balances continue to be recorded as secured
debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Our policy is
to separately record interest expense on the fair value-elected
securitization debt, which continues to be classified within
interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Income. The fair value adjustment recorded for this fair
value-elected debt is classified within other income in the
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
Collateralized
Debt Obligations (CDO)
Our ResCap operations executed two collateralized debt
obligation securitizations in 2004 and 2005 named CDO I and CDO
II. Similar to the on-balance sheet securitizations discussed
above, we retained certain economic interests in the CDOs that
entitled us to the excess cash flows at each distribution date,
after absorbing any credit losses in the CDOs. These CDOs were
required to be consolidated under FIN 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, thus the CDO
collateral remained on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
as investment securities. Under SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, the collateral is recorded at fair value on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, with revaluation
adjustments recorded through current period earnings. The CDO
debt issued to third parties, which was required to be carried
at amortized cost, was classified as secured debt on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Our retained economic
interests are not carried on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet.
Similar to the on-balance sheet securitizations discussed above,
we experienced significant devaluation in our retained economic
interests in the on-balance sheet CDO transactions during 2007.
The devaluation of our retained economic interests was primarily
the result of cash flows being contractually diverted away from
our retained interest to build cash reserves as a direct result
of certain failed securitization triggers, as well as
significant market illiquidity in the CDO market. While our
economic exposure was reduced to approximately zero, as
evidenced by our retained economic interest values, we continued
writing down the CDO collateral with no offsetting reduction in
the associated CDO debt balances. Thus, prior to fair value
option election, we were recording accounting losses beyond our
economic exposure due to accounting mismatches caused by the
application of GAAP. In order to eliminate the accounting
mismatch, we elected the fair value option for the debt balances
recorded for CDO I and CDO II on January 1, 2008.
As part of the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159, we
removed deferred upfront securitization costs related to CDO I
and CDO II. The removal of the deferred deal costs, as well as
the adjustment required to
30
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
have the items carrying value equal fair value at
January 1, 2008, resulted in a net cumulative-effect
adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings of
$35 million. These fair value option elections did not have
a material impact on our deferred tax balances.
Subsequent to the fair value option election for the CDO debt,
we no longer amortize upfront securitization costs for these
transactions, as these amounts were removed as part of the
cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 159. The fair
value-elected CDO debt balances continue to be carried within
secured debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Our
policy is to separately record interest expense on the CDO debt,
which continues to be classified within interest expense in the
Condensed Consolidated Income Statement. The fair value
adjustment recorded for the CDO debt is classified within
investment income in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement.
The following summarizes the fair value option elections and
information regarding the amounts recorded within earnings for
each fair value option elected item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes included in the Condensed Consolidated Income
Statement
|
|
|
|
|
for the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
financing
|
|
Interest
|
|
Investment
|
|
Other
|
|
included in
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
revenue
|
|
expense
|
|
income
|
|
income
|
|
earnings
|
|
due to credit
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income
|
|
|
$198
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
($2,201
|
)
|
|
|
($2,003
|
)
|
|
|
($18
|
) (a)
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet securitization debt
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
($114
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$2,147
|
|
|
|
$2,033
|
|
|
|
($22
|
) (b)
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The credit impact for consumer finance receivables and loans
were quantified by applying internal credit loss assumptions to
cash
flow models.
|
|
(b)
|
The credit impact for on-balance sheet securitization debt is
assumed to be zero until our economic interests in a particular
securitization is reduced to zero, at which point the losses on
the underlying collateral will be expected to be passed through
to
third-party bondholders. Losses allocated to third-party
bondholders, including changes in the amount of losses
allocated, will
result in fair value changes due to credit. We also monitor
credit ratings and will make credit adjustments to the extent
any bond
classes are downgraded by rating agencies.
|
|
(c)
|
The credit impact for collateralized debt obligations is assumed
to be zero until our economic interests in the securitization is
reduced to zero, at which point the losses projected on the
underlying collateral will be expected to be passed through to
third-
party bondholders. Losses allocated to third-party bondholders,
including changes in the amount of losses allocated, will result
in fair value changes due to credit. We also monitor credit
ratings and will make credit adjustments to the extent any bond
classes are downgraded by rating agencies.
|
Interest income on mortgage loans held for investment is
measured by multiplying the unpaid principal balance on the
loans by the coupon rate and the days interest due. Interest
expense on the on-balance sheet securitizations is measured by
multiplying bond principal by the coupon rate and days interest
due to the investor.
31
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
The following table provides the aggregate fair value and the
aggregate unpaid principal balance for the fair value
option-elected loans and long-term debt instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference between
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
fair value and unpaid
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Fair value
|
|
principal balance
|
|
principal balance
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer finance receivables and loans, net of unearned income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
$3,915
|
|
|
|
$10,379
|
|
|
|
($6,464
|
)
|
|
|
Loans 90+ days past due (a)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet securitization debt
|
|
|
(3,996
|
)
|
|
|
(9,791
|
)
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
Collateralized debt obligations
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Loans 90+ days past due are also presented within the nonaccrual
loan balance.
|
|
(b)
|
The fair value of loans held for sale is calculated on a pooled
basis, which does not allow us to reliably estimate the fair
value of
loans 90+ days past due or nonaccrual loans. As a
result, the fair value of these loans is not included in the
4 table above. For further discussion regarding the pooled basis,
refer to the previous section of this note titled, Consumer
finance receivables, net of unearned income.
|
32
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
11. Segment
Information
Financial results for our reportable segments are summarized
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
American
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
operations (a)
|
|
operations (b)
|
|
ResCap
|
|
operations
|
|
Other (c)
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue (loss)
|
|
|
$46
|
|
|
|
$220
|
|
|
|
($101
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$191
|
|
|
|
$356
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue (loss)
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(905
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$154
|
|
|
|
$104
|
|
|
|
($859
|
)
|
|
|
$132
|
|
|
|
($120
|
)
|
|
|
($589
|
)
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$130,893
|
|
|
|
$37,795
|
|
|
|
$73,869
|
|
|
|
$13,730
|
|
|
|
($12,933
|
)
|
|
|
$243,354
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
$34
|
|
|
|
$209
|
|
|
|
$173
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$128
|
|
|
|
$544
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2,454
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$307
|
|
|
|
$91
|
|
|
|
($910
|
)
|
|
|
$143
|
|
|
|
$64
|
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$110,829
|
|
|
|
$31,563
|
|
|
|
$125,860
|
|
|
|
$12,878
|
|
|
|
($1,382
|
)
|
|
|
$279,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
North American operations consists
of automotive financing in the United States, Canada, and Puerto
Rico. International operations consists of automotive financing
and full-service leasing in all other countries.
|
|
(b)
|
Amounts include intrasegment
eliminations between the North American operations and
International operations.
|
|
(c)
|
Represents our Commercial Finance
business, equity interest in Capmark, certain corporate
activities, and reclassifications and eliminations between the
reportable operating segments.
|
12. Restructuring
Charges
On October 17, 2007, ResCap announced a restructuring
plan that would reduce its workforce, streamline its operations,
and revise its cost structure to enhance its flexibility. The
announced restructuring plan included reducing the ResCap
worldwide workforce by approximately 25%, or approximately 3,000
associates, with the majority of these reductions occurring in
the fourth quarter of 2007. This reduction in workforce was in
addition to measures undertaken in the first half of 2007 when
2,000 positions were eliminated. During the three months ended
March 31, 2008, ResCap incurred additional
restructuring costs of $20 million related to severance and
related costs associated with the continuation of the workforce
reduction plans in the United Kingdom and continental Europe.
On February 20, 2008, we announced a restructuring of
our North American Automotive Finance operations to reduce
costs, streamline operations, and position the business for
scalable growth. The restructuring will include merging a number
of separate business offices into five regional business centers
located in the areas of Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Pittsburgh,
and Toronto. The plan includes reducing the North American
Automotive Finance operations workforce by approximately 930
employees, which represents about 15 percent of the 6,275
employees of these operations. These actions are planned to
occur largely by the end of 2008. During the three months ended
March 31, 2008, our North American Automotive Finance
operations
33
GMAC
LLC
NOTES TO
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)
and Insurance operations incurred restructuring costs related to
severance and related costs of $11 million and
$3 million, respectively.
The restructuring charges primarily include severance pay, the
buyout of employee agreements, and lease terminations. The
following table summarizes by category, restructuring charge
activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
or otherwise
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
balance at
|
|
charges through
|
|
settled through
|
|
balance at
|
($ in millions)
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Restructuring charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance
|
|
|
$32
|
|
|
|
$34
|
|
|
|
($20
|
)
|
|
|
$46
|
|
Lease termination
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring charges
|
|
|
$77
|
|
|
|
$34
|
|
|
|
($27
|
)
|
|
|
$84
|
|
|
13. Subsequent
Events
As previously announced, we are investigating various strategic
alternatives related to all aspects of ResCaps business,
including extensions and replacements of existing secured
borrowing facilities, and establishing additional sources of
secured funding for ResCaps operations.
On April 18, 2008, Residential Funding Company, LLC (RFC)
and GMAC Mortgage, LLC (GMAC Mortgage), both subsidiaries of
ResCap, entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with GMAC, as
lender, to provide RFC and GMAC Mortgage with a revolving credit
facility with a principal amount of up to $750 million. To
secure the obligations of RFC and GMAC Mortgage under the Loan
and Security Agreement, RFC and GMAC Mortgage have pledged as
collateral, their servicing rights and related contractual
rights under certain pooling and servicing agreements and loan
servicing agreements with respect to pools of first- and
second-lien mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. On
April 18, 2008, RFC and GMAC Mortgage borrowed
$468 million collectively under the Loan and Security
Agreement.
ResCap, on May 5, 2008, launched a debt tender and exchange
offers, as previously announced, for its outstanding unsecured
notes to improve its financial flexibility by extending the
maturities of such indebtedness and reducing the overall
indebtedness. ResCap is offering eligible holders of ResCap
notes that mature in 2008 and 2009, as well as holders of ResCap
notes that mature in 2010 through 2015, the ability to exchange
such notes for one of two newly issued series of notes of
ResCap. Holders of ResCaps floating rate notes maturing on
June 9, 2008, have the ability to tender such notes for
cash. In addition, eligible holders participating in the
exchange offers may elect to receive cash in lieu of new notes
that they would otherwise receive pursuant to a Modified
Dutch Auction process. Newly issued notes would be secured
by a second or third priority lien on the assets that would
secure the proposed senior secured credit facility with GMAC.
We are currently in negotiations to provide ResCap with a new
$3.5 billion senior secured credit facility, which would be
used to fund the cash required for the previously announced
offers, to repay ResCaps term loan maturing in July 2008,
and to replace ResCaps $875 million
364-day
revolving bank credit facility and its $875 million
3-year
revolving bank credit facility. This facility would be secured
by a first priority lien in substantially all of ResCaps
existing and after-acquired unencumbered assets remaining
available to be pledged as collateral.
34
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Overview
GMAC is a leading, independent, globally diversified, financial
services firm with approximately $243 billion of assets at
March 31, 2008, and operations in approximately 40
countries. Founded in 1919 as a wholly owned subsidiary of
General Motors Corporation (General Motors or GM), GMAC was
established to provide GM dealers with the automotive financing
necessary to acquire and maintain vehicle inventories and to
provide retail customers the means by which to finance vehicle
purchases through GM dealers. On November 30, 2006, GM
sold a 51% interest in us for approximately $7.4 billion
(the Sale Transactions) to FIM Holdings LLC
(FIM Holdings), an investment consortium led by Cerberus
FIM Investors, LLC, the sole managing member. The
consortium also includes Citigroup Inc., Aozora Bank Ltd., and a
subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Our products and services have expanded beyond automotive
financing as we currently operate in the following lines of
business Global Automotive Finance, Mortgage
(Residential Capital, LLC or ResCap), and Insurance. The
following table summarizes the operating results of each line of
business for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007. Operating results for each of the lines of business are
more fully described in the Managements Discussion and
Analysis (MD&A) sections that follow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Total net revenue (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance
|
|
|
|
$1,234
|
|
|
|
|
$1,192
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
ResCap
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance
|
|
|
|
$258
|
|
|
|
|
$398
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
ResCap
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Global Automotive Finance operations offer a wide range of
financial services and products (directly and indirectly) to
retail automotive consumers, automotive dealerships, and other
commercial businesses. Our Global Automotive Finance operations
consist of two separate reportable segments North
American Automotive Finance operations and International
Automotive Finance operations. The products and services offered
by our Global Automotive Finance operations include the purchase
of retail installment sales contracts and leases, offering of
term loans, dealer floor plan financing and other lines of
credit to dealers, fleet leasing, and vehicle remarketing
services. Whereas most of our operations focus on prime
automotive financing to and through GM or GM-affiliated dealers,
our Nuvell operations, which is part of our North American
Automotive Finance operations, focuses on nonprime automotive
financing to GM-affiliated dealers. Our Nuvell operation also
provides private-label automotive financing. Our National
operations, which is also part of our North American Automotive
Finance operations, focuses on prime and nonprime financing to
non-GM dealers. In addition, our Global Automotive Finance
operations utilize asset securitization and whole-loan sales as
a critical component of our diversified funding strategy.
|
|
|
Our ResCap operations engage in the origination, purchase,
servicing, sale, and securitization of consumer (i.e.,
residential) mortgage loans and mortgage-related products (e.g.,
real estate services). Typically, mortgage loans are originated
and sold to investors in the secondary market including
securitization transactions in which the assets are legally sold
but are accounted for as secured financings. In response to
market conditions, ResCap has significantly reduced its
production of loans that do not conform to the underwriting
guidelines of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. ResCap has further
curtailed activities related to
|
35
|
|
|
both its business capital group, which provides financing and
equity capital to residential land developers and homebuilders
and financing to resort developers, and its international
business group, which includes substantially all of its
operations outside of the United States. Certain agreements are
in place between ResCap and us that restrict ResCaps
ability to declare dividends or prepay subordinated indebtedness
owed to us as well as inhibit our ability to return funds for
dividend and debt payments.
|
|
|
|
Our Insurance operations offer vehicle service contracts and
underwrite personal automobile insurance coverages (ranging from
preferred to nonstandard risks), homeowners insurance
coverage, and selected commercial insurance and reinsurance
coverages. We are a leading provider of vehicle service
contracts with mechanical breakdown and maintenance coverages.
Our vehicle service contracts offer vehicle owners and lessees
mechanical repair protection and roadside assistance for new and
used vehicles beyond the manufacturers new vehicle
warranty. We underwrite and market nonstandard, standard, and
preferred-risk physical damage and liability insurance coverages
for passenger automobiles, motorcycles, recreational vehicles,
and commercial automobiles through independent agency, direct
response, and internet channels. Additionally, we market
private-label insurance through a long-term agency relationship
with Homesite Insurance, a national provider of home
insurance products. We provide commercial insurance, primarily
covering dealers wholesale vehicle inventory, and
reinsurance products. Internationally, ABA Seguros provides
certain commercial business insurance exclusively in Mexico.
|
|
|
Other operations consist of our Commercial Finance Group, an
equity investment in Capmark (our former commercial mortgage
operations), corporate activities, and reclassifications and
eliminations between the reportable segments.
|
Consolidated
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our consolidated operating
results for the periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
|
$4,932
|
|
|
|
|
$5,298
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Depreciation expense on operating lease assets
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan servicing income
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Insurance premiums and service revenue earned
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Loss on mortgage and automotive loans, net
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Investment (loss) income
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenue
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
|
2,454
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Loss before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
($589
|
)
|
|
|
|
($305
|
)
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
36
We reported a net loss of $589 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to a loss of
$305 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The results reflect the profitable
results of our Global Automotive Finance and Insurance
businesses that were more than offset by significant losses in
the international mortgage operations of ResCap. Market-driven
valuation adjustments and lower net financing revenue adversely
impacted results for the three months ended
March 31, 2008.
Total financing revenue decreased by 7% in the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to decreases experienced by ResCap as a
result of a decrease in the size of the loan portfolio, due to
lower levels of loan production as the operations focused on
prime conforming originations, continued portfolio run-off, and
reductions caused by the deconsolidation of $27.4 billion
in securitization trusts during the second half of 2007. In
addition, our North American Automotive Finance operations
experienced decreases in consumer finance revenue due to a lower
asset base, as a result of increased securitization and
whole-loan sale activity throughout 2007 as the business moved
to an
originate-to-distribute
model during 2007. Partially offsetting this decrease was a 34%
increase in operating lease income in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The operating lease portfolio was lower as of
March 31, 2007, due to approximately
$12.6 billion of net operating assets being transferred to
GM during November 2006 as part of the Sales Transaction.
Subsequent to the transfer, the operating lease portfolio and
the associated revenue gradually increased through
March 31, 2008, because of new originations following
this transfer. Similarly, depreciation expense on operating
lease assets increased 29% in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007,
as a result of the larger portfolio.
Interest expense decreased 13% in the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The reduction was primarily due to lower average borrowings at
ResCap due to a $47 billion reduction in the asset base
during the same period, which was partially offset by higher
funding rates due to unfavorable market conditions, resulting in
lower advance rates and an increase in cost of funds on
unsecured debt due to the
step-up in
coupon resulting from ratings downgrades.
Net loan servicing income increased 242% in the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in
2007. These increases were primarily attributable to favorable
hedge valuations experienced by ResCap. Offsetting these
increases, our Global Automotive Finance operations experienced
a decrease driven by the amortization of the outstanding
principal balances related to each outstanding securitization
transaction.
Insurance premiums and service revenue earned increased 7% in
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
same period in 2007. The increase was primarily due to growth
internationally, both organically and through the second quarter
2007 acquisition of Provident Insurance. The increase was
partially offset by challenging conditions in the domestic
vehicle service contract, personal insurance, and reinsurance
businesses.
The net loss on mortgage and automotive loans was
$600 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $37 million in 2007.
Losses primarily increased due to declines experienced by ResCap
in the fair value of loans held for sale and commitments in
certain foreign markets. ResCap also experienced higher realized
losses on the sale of mortgage loans, primarily driven by
illiquidity in foreign markets. The net gain on automotive loans
recognized by our Global Automotive Finance operations also
decreased as a result of a decrease in whole-loan and
off-balance sheet securitization activities.
Our investment loss was $232 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to investment income of
$309 million during the same period in 2007. The loss was
primarily due to the decline in the fair value of retained
interests held by ResCap as a result of increased credit losses,
rating agency downgrades, declines in the value of underlying
collateral, market illiquidity, and changes in discount rate
assumptions in certain foreign markets.
Other income increased 4% during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
Results for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
included a $480 million gain recognized by ResCap related
to debt extinguishments and an $8 million gain recognized
by our Other operations related to the repurchase and retirement
of ResCap debt.
37
The provision for credit losses decreased 30% in the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007. The decrease was due primarily to specific
warehouse lending reserves taken by ResCap during the three
months ended March 31, 2007, lower provisions on
domestic loans held for investment, and the election of
SFAS 159 on approximately $10.5 billion of loans. The
decrease was consistent with the decrease in the size of the
portfolio, which occurred as a result of the $27.4 billion
deconsolidation of securitization trusts in the second half of
2007 and portfolio run-off as the mortgage business
substantially stopped originating nonprime loans and focused on
prime conforming loans. The decrease at ResCap was offset by an
increase for our Global Automotive Finance operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
same period in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to
the absence of credit loss reversals related to nonrecurring
asset sales and a change in estimate related to Hurricane
Katrina loss provisions, which favorably impacted the expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses increased 10% in
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
same period in 2007. Losses and loss adjustment expenses
increased primarily due to the acquisition of U.K.-based
Provident Insurance and organic growth in other international
operations. The increase was partially offset by lower loss
experience in our U.S. vehicle service contract and personal
insurance businesses, driven by lower volumes.
Our consolidated tax expense decreased 88% for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to higher current period losses in
ResCaps international operations for which no tax benefit
was recorded and new valuation allowances that were established
with respect to prior year losses.
Effective November 28, 2006, GMAC, and certain U.S.
subsidiaries, became pass-through entities for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. Subsequent to November 28, 2006,
U.S. federal, state, and local income tax expense has generally
not been incurred by these entities as they ceased to be taxable
entities in all but a few local tax jurisdictions that continue
to tax LLCs or partnerships. Our banking, insurance, and foreign
subsidiaries are generally taxable corporations and continue to
be subject to U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign income
taxes.
38
Global
Automotive Finance Operations
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results of our
Global Automotive Finance operations for the periods shown. The
amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and
transactions with our other reportable segments and include
eliminations of balances and transactions among our North
American and International reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
$1,138
|
|
|
|
|
$1,386
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Depreciation expense on operating leases
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing revenue
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Gain on automotive loans, net
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenue
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
$258
|
|
|
|
|
$398
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
$168,688
|
|
|
|
|
$142,392
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Net income decreased to $258 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to $398 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Weaker
credit performance drove unfavorable valuation adjustments,
higher provision for credit losses, and increased operating
expenses related to restructuring, remarketing, and servicing
initiatives. Lower gains on the sale of receivables and
deterioration in the residual performance of off-lease vehicles
also affected performance.
Total financing revenue increased 15% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
Operating lease revenue increased due to an increase in the size
of the operating lease portfolio. The operating lease portfolio
was lower as of March 31, 2007, due to approximately
$12.6 billion of net operating lease assets that were
transferred to GM during November 2006 as part of the Sales
Transaction. Subsequent to the transfer, the operating lease
portfolio and the associated revenue have gradually increased
through March 31, 2008. Commercial revenue increased
primarily due to the refinancing of certain off-balance sheet
wholesale securitization transactions with on-balance sheet
financings in the second quarter of 2007, growth in
International operations, and favorable foreign currency
translation adjustments. Increases in operating lease and
commercial revenue were partially offset by a decline in
consumer revenue. Consumer revenue, combined with interest
income on consumer loans held for sale, decreased 7%, consistent
with the
39
reduction in consumer asset levels. Consumer finance
receivables, including loans held for sale, declined by
$5 billion, or approximately 9%, since
March 31, 2007. Lower consumer asset levels as of
March 31, 2008, are the result of increased
securitization and whole-loan sale activities throughout the
2007 fiscal year as the business refocused on an
originate-to-distribute
model. The $156 million of income on consumer loans held
for sale relates to interest on loans that are expected to be
sold in whole-loan transactions over the next twelve months.
Interest expense increased 8% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The increase was primarily due to unfavorable foreign currency
translation adjustments and increased asset growth in our
International operations, specifically in Latin America and
Europe. The increase was offset by less favorable
mark-to-market
adjustments on certain cancelable swaps during the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in
2007. The 2008
mark-to-market
adjustment was less favorable due to movement in the benchmark
forward yield curve.
Servicing fees decreased 30% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The decrease was primarily the result of the amortization of the
outstanding principal balances related to each outstanding
securitization transaction.
Net gain on automotive loans decreased 25% for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in
2007. The decrease was primarily a result of a decrease in
whole-loan and off-balance sheet securitization activity of
consumer finance receivables in our North American operations.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, our North
American operations executed approximately $2.5 billion in
whole-loan and off-balance sheet securitization transactions,
compared to $5.1 billion during the same period in 2007.
Refer to the Funding and Liquidity section of this MD&A for
further discussion. As a result of the decline in the
off-balance sheet portion of the serviced portfolio, servicing
fees decreased 30% during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
Investment income decreased 32% during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The decrease was largely driven by investment portfolio losses
recognized by our North American operations. Certain trading and
available-for sale securities were sold at a loss as a result of
market conditions within the period, (e.g., a downgrade in the
rating of a debt security below our investment grade standards).
Other income increased 23% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007,
due to higher revenue on intercompany loans caused by higher
lending levels, which resulted in higher interest income as a
result of an increase in the average balance of cash and cash
equivalents.
Our provision for credit losses increased 27% during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to the
absence of allowance for loan loss reversals, which favorably
impacted the expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The reversals were associated with
nonrecurring asset sales and a favorable change in estimate
relating to Hurricane Katrina loss provisions for our North
American operations. The provision also increased during the
three months ended March 31, 2008, for our
International operations due to growth in the underlying
portfolio.
In addition, noninterest expenses increased 25% for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007. The increase during the period was primarily
attributed to higher proceeds owed to GM related to the March
2008 pull-ahead program, increased remarketing costs, increased
collection and repossession expenses, and $11 million of
restructuring charges related to our North American operations.
Total income tax expense decreased by $6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
same period in 2007. The majority of the tax expense for both
periods relates to our International operations. Due to our
election to be treated as a pass-through entity, the majority of
the U.S. Automotive Finance operations are not subject to a
federal income tax provision.
40
Automotive
Financing Volume
The following table summarizes our new and used vehicle consumer
and wholesale financing volume and our share of GM consumer and
wholesale volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC volume
|
|
|
Share of GM retail sales
|
|
|
|
(units in thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer automotive financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM new vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail contracts
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
|
International (retail contracts and leases)
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GM new units financed
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used units financed
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GM new units financed
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer automotive financing volume
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale financing of new vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GM vehicles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GM units financed
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GM units financed
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale volume
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our consumer automotive financing volume and penetration levels
are significantly influenced by the nature, timing, and extent
of GMs use of rate, residual, and other financing
incentives for marketing purposes on consumer retail automotive
contracts and leases. Despite declining vehicle sales, our North
American penetration levels during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, were higher than what was experienced
in 2007, mainly due to an increase in incentive programs by GM
primarily in March 2008. The consumer penetration levels of our
International operations slightly increased during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to increased penetration levels in
our Asia Pacific and European operations.
Our wholesale automotive financing continues to be the primary
funding source for GM dealer inventories. Penetration levels in
North America continue to reflect traditionally strong levels,
consistent with recent historical experience. The wholesale
penetration levels of our International operations decreased
during the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared
to the same period in 2007, primarily due to lower wholesale
volume, particularly in our Asia Pacific operations.
41
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The following table summarizes activity related to the allowance
for credit losses for our Global Automotive Finance operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
$1,309
|
|
|
|
$61
|
|
|
|
$1,370
|
|
|
|
$1,460
|
|
|
|
$69
|
|
|
|
$1,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
|
|
|
$1,276
|
|
|
|
$64
|
|
|
|
$1,340
|
|
|
|
$1,410
|
|
|
|
$71
|
|
|
|
$1,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance coverage (a)
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents the related allowance for credit losses as a
percentage of total on-balance sheet automotive retail contracts
excluding
loans held for sale.
|
Decreases in the level of allowance from 2007 levels are
reflective of proportional decreases in the on-balance sheet
consumer portfolio over the same period. Despite the overall
decline in the level of the allowance, the allowance for credit
losses as a percentage of the total on-balance sheet consumer
portfolio experienced an increase in comparison with 2007. The
increased use of off-balance sheet securitizations and
whole-loan sales activity within our North American operations
results in the sale of a better mix of contracts as the process
of creating a pool of retail finance receivables for
securitization or sale typically excludes accounts that are
greater than 30 days delinquent at that time. In addition,
the process involves selecting from a pool of receivables that
are currently outstanding and, therefore, represent seasoned
accounts. A seasoned portfolio that excludes delinquent accounts
historically results in better credit performance than in the
on-balance sheet portfolio of retail finance receivables on
which the allowance for credit losses is based.
Consumer
Credit
The following tables summarize pertinent loss experience in the
consumer managed and on-balance sheet automotive retail contract
portfolios. The managed portfolio includes retail receivables
held on-balance sheet for investment and off-balance sheet
receivables. The off-balance sheet portion of the managed
portfolio includes receivables securitized and sold that we
continue to service and in which we retain an interest or risk
of loss but excludes securitized and sold finance receivables
that we continue to service but in which we retain no interest
or risk of loss.
We believe that the disclosure of the credit experience of the
managed portfolio presents a more complete presentation of our
risk of loss in the underlying assets (typically in the form of
a subordinated retained interest). Consistent with the
presentation on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, retail
contracts
42
presented in the table represent the principal balance of the
finance receivables discounted for any unearned interest income
and rate support received from GM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Charge-offs,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retail
|
|
net of
|
|
Annualized net
|
|
|
Three months ended March
31,
|
|
contracts
|
|
recoveries (a)
|
|
charge-off rate
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$49,994
|
|
|
|
$173
|
|
|
|
$162
|
|
|
|
1.38%
|
|
|
|
1.29%
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
18,991
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0.74%
|
|
|
|
0.64%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed
|
|
|
$68,985
|
|
|
|
$208
|
|
|
|
$188
|
|
|
|
1.21%
|
|
|
|
1.13%
|
|
|
|
|
On-balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$35,771
|
|
|
|
$134
|
|
|
|
$157
|
|
|
|
1.50%
|
|
|
|
1.43%
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
18,991
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0.74%
|
|
|
|
0.64%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total on-balance sheet
|
|
|
$54,762
|
|
|
|
$169
|
|
|
|
$183
|
|
|
|
1.23%
|
|
|
|
1.21%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Net charge-offs exclude amounts related to the lump-sum payments
on balloon finance contracts of $42 million and
$3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
Charge-offs in both the North American and International managed
portfolio increased during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
In North America, both frequency and severity of losses
increased in comparison with prior year levels. We attribute
much of this increase to the underlying credit quality of retail
contracts originated during the second half of 2006 and first
half of 2007 (refer to delinquency discussion below). Also
contributing to the increase was higher severity as a result of
a weak used vehicle market in the United States and Canada as
well as an increase in loan-to-value ratios. Increased
charge-offs in the International portfolio primarily reflect
weakness in certain Latin America countries including Colombia
and Brazil.
The following table summarizes pertinent delinquency experience
in the consumer automotive retail contract portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of retail contracts
|
|
|
|
|
30 days or more past due (a)
|
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
On-balance sheet
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
2.45%
|
|
|
|
2.51%
|
|
|
|
2.70%
|
|
|
2.80%
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
2.37%
|
|
|
|
2.55%
|
|
|
|
2.37%
|
|
|
2.55%
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2.42%
|
|
|
|
2.52%
|
|
|
|
2.56%
|
|
|
2.71%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Past due contracts are calculated on the basis of the average
number of contracts delinquent during a month and exclude
accounts in bankruptcy.
|
Delinquencies in the North American managed portfolio decreased
as of March 31, 2008, compared to
March 31, 2007. We attribute much of the decrease to a
shift in underwriting standards that has occurred since the
second half of 2007. During the second half of 2006 through the
first half of 2007, we underwrote a number of U.S. retail
contracts that resulted in an unusually high rate of early
payment defaults. When the early defaults began, we tightened
our underwriting policy to reduce this production. As a result,
delinquency rates have improved, in part, due to the tightened
underwriting policy. The decrease in delinquencies also reflects
expanded resources dedicated to servicing and collections
efforts beginning in the second half of 2007. International
consumer credit portfolio performance remains strong, as
delinquencies have declined compared to the prior year level.
43
In addition to the preceding loss and delinquency data, the
following table summarizes bankruptcy information for the U.S.
consumer automotive retail contract portfolio (which represents
approximately 52% and 65% of our on-balance sheet consumer
automotive retail contract portfolio as of
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively) and
repossession information for the Global Automotive Finance
operations consumer automotive retail contract portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed
|
|
On-balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March
31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average retail contracts in bankruptcy
(in units) (a)
|
|
|
51,430
|
|
|
|
67,307
|
|
|
|
46,435
|
|
|
|
66,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcies as a percentage of average number of contracts
outstanding
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail contract repossessions (in units)
|
|
|
21,280
|
|
|
|
19,551
|
|
|
|
16,412
|
|
|
|
18,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized repossessions as a percentage of average number of
contracts outstanding
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
2.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail contract repossessions (in units)
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
|
|
2,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized repossessions as a percentage of average number of
contracts outstanding
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.66
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes those accounts where the
customer has filed for bankruptcy and is not yet discharged, the
customer was discharged from bankruptcy but did not reaffirm
their loan with GMAC, and other special situations where the
customer is protected by applicable
law with respect to GMACs normal collection policies and
procedures.
|
|
New bankruptcy filings continued to decrease during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, consistent with decreases
experienced throughout the year ended
December 31, 2007. The decreases throughout both years
are related to the gradual emergence of consumers who filed
bankruptcy in 2005, prior to a change in bankruptcy law, which
made it more difficult for some consumers to qualify for certain
bankruptcy protection. The significant increase of bankruptcy
filings prior to the change in law has resulted in a situation
where the number of contracts emerging from bankruptcy exceeds
the number of contracts entering bankruptcy.
Consistent with the decrease in delinquency trends, our
International operations experienced decreased repossessions for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
same period in 2007. Our North American operations, however,
experienced increased repossessions primarily due to increased
delinquencies during the three months ended
December 31, 2007. During the last quarter of 2007,
delinquencies increased due to credit deterioration, which
resulted in additional repossessions during the three months
ended March 31, 2008.
Commercial
Credit
Our credit risk on the commercial portfolio is considerably
different from that of our consumer portfolio. Whereas the
consumer portfolio represents a homogenous pool of retail
contracts that exhibit fairly predictable and stable loss
patterns, the commercial portfolio exposures are less
predictable. In general, the credit risk of the commercial
portfolio is tied to overall economic conditions in the
countries in which we operate, as well as the particular
circumstances of individual borrowers.
At March 31, 2008, the commercial receivables that had
been securitized and accounted for as off-balance sheet
transactions primarily represent wholesale lines of credit
extended to automotive dealerships,
44
which historically experience low charge-offs, and some dealer
term loans. As a result, only the on-balance sheet commercial
portfolio credit experience is presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
Impaired loans (a)
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Dec 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
$23,469
|
|
|
|
$41
|
|
|
|
$44
|
|
|
|
$311
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans as a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
Other commercial financing
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans as a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total on-balance sheet
|
|
|
$28,520
|
|
|
|
$58
|
|
|
|
$52
|
|
|
|
$356
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans as a percentage of total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes loans where it is probable that we will be unable to
collect all amounts due according to the terms of the loan.
|
Charge-offs on the commercial portfolio remain at traditionally
low levels as these receivables are generally secured by
vehicles, real estate, and other forms of collateral, which help
mitigate losses on the loans in the event of default. The
decline in impaired loans since March 31, 2007, is the
result of the resolution of a particular dealer account, which
did not result in the charge-off of loans previously provided
for.
Charge-offs on the wholesale portfolio remained at traditionally
low levels in the three months ended March 31, 2008,
as these receivables are generally secured by vehicles, real
estate, and other forms of collateral, which help mitigate
losses on such loans in the event of default.
45
ResCap
Operations
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results for ResCap
for the periods shown. The amounts presented are before the
elimination of balances and transactions with our other
reportable segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financing revenue
|
|
|
|
$1,004
|
|
|
|
|
$1,874
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing (loss) revenue
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Servicing fees
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Servicing asset valuation and hedge activities, net
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
(302
|
)
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan servicing income
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Loss on the sale of loans, net
|
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) revenue
|
|
|
|
(722
|
)
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
Total net (loss) revenue
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Loss before income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
|
(905
|
)
|
|
|
|
(851
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
($859
|
)
|
|
|
|
($910
|
)
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
$73,869
|
|
|
|
|
$125,860
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
ResCap experienced a net loss of $859 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to net loss of
$910 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The 2008 results were positively
affected by favorable hedge valuations and adversely affected by
continued pressure in the domestic housing markets and certain
foreign mortgage and capital markets. The adverse conditions
resulted in lower net interest margins, lower loan production,
fair value declines related to mortgage loans held for sale and
trading securities, impairments on real estate investments, and
reduced gains associated with the disposition of real estate
acquired through foreclosure. In the short term, it is probable
the mortgage industry will continue to experience both declining
mortgage origination volumes and reduced total mortgage
indebtedness due to the deterioration of the nonprime and
nonconforming mortgage market. We do not expect the current
market conditions to turn favorable in the near term.
As part of ResCaps strategy to respond to the challenging
market conditions of 2007 and 2008, we have undertaken numerous
initiatives to liquidate certain ResCap assets and to reduce its
funding needs. Asset liquidation initiatives have included,
among other things, sale of retained interests in ResCaps
mortgage securitizations, marketing of loans secured by
time-share receivables, marketing of ResCaps continental
Europe mortgage loan portfolios, whole-loan sales, and marketing
of businesses and platforms that are unrelated to ResCaps
core mortgage finance business. Though ResCap has executed a
number of sales of mortgage loans and retained securities, other
marketing efforts have yet to be completed, in part because of
continuing adverse market conditions.
46
A net financing loss of $101 million was incurred in the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to net
financing revenue of $173 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in total financing
revenue was due to the decrease in the size of the loan
portfolio, as a result of declines in mortgage production,
continued portfolio run-off, and reductions caused by the
deconsolidation of $27.4 billion in securitization trusts
in the last quarter of 2007. The decrease was further
attributable to lower servicing float income and a decrease in
commercial lending yields. The decrease in interest expense, due
to lower average borrowings, was partially offset by higher
funding rates due to unfavorable market conditions, resulting in
lower advance rates and an increase in cost of funds on
unsecured debt due to the
step-up in
coupon resulting from ratings downgrades.
Net loan servicing income was $802 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
$145 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The increase in net servicing fees was
primarily driven by favorable hedge valuations during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007. Marginally offsetting the increases, were
decreases due to the sale of payment option arm servicing rights
during the three months ended March 31, 2008, and
run-off of nonconforming servicing portfolio.
The net loss on mortgage loans was $748 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
$235 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The additional losses recognized
during the three months ended March 31, 2008, resulted
primarily from declines in fair value for loans held for sale
and commitments in certain foreign markets of $603 million,
primarily in the United Kingdom and continental Europe. In
addition to the unfavorable fair value adjustments, foreign
operations recognized lower realized gains on the sale of
mortgage loans due to lower volumes, and margins experienced as
a result of market illiquidity.
Other income decreased 94% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The decrease was primarily caused by decreased gains on
investment securities due to the decline in the fair value of
our retained interests as a result of increased credit losses,
rating agency downgrades, declines in the value of underlying
collateral, market illiquidity, and changes in discount rate
assumptions. Real estate gains also decreased, which was driven
by continued stress in the mortgage and capital markets. The
overall decline was offset by a gain on extinguishment of debt
of $480 million resulting from our contribution of ResCap
notes that had been purchased previously in open market
repurchase transactions with a face amount of approximately
$1.2 billion and a fair value of approximately
$750 million. ResCap cancelled the $1.2 billion face
amount of notes and recognized a gain on extinguishment of
$480 million. No similar gain was recognized during the
2007 period.
The provision for credit losses decreased to $300 million
in the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
$542 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The decrease was due primarily to
specific warehouse lending reserves taken during the three
months ended March, 31, 2007, and lower provisions on domestic
loans held for investment due to the deconsolidation of
securitization trusts in 2007 portfolio run-off, and the
election of SFAS 159 accounting on approximately
$10.5 billion of loans. The decreases were partially offset
by higher provision for credit losses related to our distressed
assets portfolio and continued increases in frequency and
severity. In addition, the provision for credit losses related
to foreign operations increased, primarily due to higher
delinquencies in Spain and Germany.
Noninterest expense decreased 28% for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007.
The expense decreased for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, due to a decrease in the provision for
assets sold with recourse and lower compensation and benefit
expenses related to the restructuring plan announced in the
fourth quarter of 2007 and decreased commissions due to lower
loan production.
Income tax benefit was $46 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to income tax expense
of $59 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The tax benefit was caused by pretax
losses recognized by the foreign operations, partially offset by
valuation allowances. During the three months ended
March 31, 2008, valuation allowances of
$200 million were established against a portion of current
and
47
prior period operating losses. The valuation allowances resulted
from further declines in the international markets and the
resulting likelihood that these tax benefits will not be
realized in future periods.
Mortgage
Loan Production, Sales and Servicing
ResCaps mortgage loan production for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 was $20.9 billion, a
decrease of 44% compared to $37.5 billion for the same
period in 2007. ResCaps domestic loan production decreased
$12.3 billion, or 40%, and international loan production
decreased $4.3 billion, or 66%, compared to the same period
in 2007. ResCaps domestic loan production decreased due to
significant curtailments of our nonprime products, in addition
to declines in prime nonconforming and prime second-lien
product, partially offset by increases in prime conforming
products. The overall decline in mortgage production is the
result of stricter mortgage underwriting guidelines in response
to market conditions and the strategic decision to curtail
production in certain foreign markets.
The following summarizes mortgage loan production for the
periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount by product type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime conforming
|
|
|
$15,437
|
|
|
|
$9,569
|
|
|
|
Prime nonconforming
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
Nonprime
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
|
Prime second-lien
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
5,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production
|
|
|
18,708
|
|
|
|
31,042
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$20,899
|
|
|
|
$37,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount by origination channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and direct channels
|
|
|
$5,099
|
|
|
|
$6,031
|
|
|
|
Correspondent and broker channels
|
|
|
13,609
|
|
|
|
25,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production
|
|
|
$18,708
|
|
|
|
$31,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of loans (in units):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail and direct channels
|
|
|
27,947
|
|
|
|
47,638
|
|
|
|
Correspondent and broker channels
|
|
|
62,314
|
|
|
|
163,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production
|
|
|
90,261
|
|
|
|
211,077
|
|
|
|
|
48
The following table summarizes the primary domestic mortgage
loan-servicing portfolio for which we hold the corresponding
mortgage servicing rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. mortgage loan servicing portfolio
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
Number
|
|
Dollar amount
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
of loans
|
|
of loans
|
|
of loans
|
|
of loans
|
|
|
|
|
Prime conforming
|
|
|
1,687,280
|
|
|
|
$276,212
|
|
|
|
1,652,933
|
|
|
|
$267,511
|
|
|
|
Prime nonconforming
|
|
|
182,569
|
|
|
|
55,816
|
|
|
|
184,154
|
|
|
|
54,993
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
184,896
|
|
|
|
20,453
|
|
|
|
179,475
|
|
|
|
19,382
|
|
|
|
Nonprime
|
|
|
253,438
|
|
|
|
32,840
|
|
|
|
282,250
|
|
|
|
36,809
|
|
|
|
Prime second-lien
|
|
|
711,880
|
|
|
|
30,881
|
|
|
|
730,866
|
|
|
|
31,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. production (a)
|
|
|
3,020,063
|
|
|
|
$416,202
|
|
|
|
3,029,678
|
|
|
|
$410,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes loans for which we acted as a subservicer. Subserviced
loans totaled 167,848 with an unpaid principal balance of
$32.8 billion at March 31, 2008, and 205,019 with
an unpaid balance of $44.3 billion at
December 31, 2007.
|
Our international servicing portfolio was comprised of
$43.7 billion of mortgage loans as of
March 31, 2008.
Allowance
for Credit Losses
The following tables summarize the activity related to the
allowance for credit losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1,
|
|
|
$832
|
|
|
|
$485
|
|
|
|
$1,317
|
|
|
|
$1,508
|
|
|
|
$397
|
|
|
|
$1,905
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
Reduction of allowance due to fair value option election (a)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
|
|
|
$485
|
|
|
|
$405
|
|
|
|
$890
|
|
|
|
$1,660
|
|
|
|
$525
|
|
|
|
$2,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance as a percentage of total (b)
|
|
|
1.59
|
% (c)
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents the reduction of allowance as a result of fair value
option election made under SFAS 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Refer
to Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
|
|
(b)
|
Represents the related allowance for credit losses as a
percentage of total on-balance sheet residential mortgage loans.
|
|
(c)
|
As of March 31, 2008, $3.9 billion are loans held
at fair value with no related allowance for credit loss. The
loans held at fair value have been excluded from the calculation.
|
49
The following table sets forth the types of mortgage loans held
for investment, excluding those loans held at fair value that
comprise the dollar balance and the percentage component of
allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance as a
|
|
|
|
Allowance as a
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
% of the total
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
% of the total
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
loan losses
|
|
asset class (a)
|
|
loan losses
|
|
asset class (a)
|
|
|
|
Nonprime mortgage loans
|
|
|
$222
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
$1,525
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
|
|
Prime second-lien mortgage loans
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
Prime nonconforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
Prime conforming mortgage loans
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
$485
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
|
$1,660
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents the related allowance for credit losses as a
percentage of total on-balance sheet residential mortgage loans.
|
|
(b)
|
As of March 31, 2008, $3.9 billion are loans held at
fair value with no related allowance for credit loss. The loans
held at fair value have been excluded from the calculation.
|
Nonperforming
Assets
The following table summarizes the nonperforming assets in the
on-balance sheet held for sale and held for investment
residential mortgage loan portfolios. Nonperforming assets are
nonaccrual loans, foreclosed assets, and restructured loans.
Mortgage loans and lending receivables are generally placed on
nonaccrual status when they are 60 and 90 days past due,
respectively, or when the timely collection of the principal of
the loan, in whole or in part, is doubtful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime conforming
|
|
|
$42
|
|
|
|
$85
|
|
|
|
$8
|
|
|
|
Prime nonconforming
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime second-lien
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
Nonprime (a)
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
4,040
|
|
|
|
7,133
|
|
|
|
Lending receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
Construction (b)
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual assets
|
|
|
6,260
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
9,185
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
|
$7,408
|
|
|
|
$7,125
|
|
|
|
$10,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total ResCap assets
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes loans that were purchased distressed and already in
nonaccrual status of $171 million as of
March 31, 2008; $1.1 billion
as of December 31, 2007; and $481 million as of
March 31, 2007. In addition, includes nonaccrual
restructured loans that are not
included in restructured loans of $24 million as of
March 31, 2008; $16 million
as of December 31, 2007; and $5 million as of
March 31, 2007.
|
|
(b)
|
Includes nonaccrual restructured loans that are not included in
restructured loans of $102 million as of
March 31, 2008; $47 million as of
December 31, 2007; and $18 million as of
March 31, 2007.
|
50
The classification of a loan as nonperforming does not
necessarily indicate that the principal amount of the loan is
ultimately uncollectible in whole or in part. In certain cases,
borrowers make payments to bring their loans contractually
current and, in all cases, our mortgage loans are collateralized
by residential real estate. As a result, ResCaps
experience has been that any amount of ultimate loss is
substantially less than the unpaid principal balance of a
nonperforming loan.
The following table summarizes the delinquency information for
our mortgage loans held for investment portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of total
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
$34,080
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
$35,558
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
$51,802
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Past due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 to 59 days
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
60 to 89 days
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
90 days or more
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2,513
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Foreclosures pending
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Bankruptcies
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unpaid principal balances
|
|
|
|
41,582
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
43,048
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
64,689
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Net (discounts) premiums
|
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(885
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 159 fair value adjustment
|
|
|
|
(6,409
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$34,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$42,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$65,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the delinquency information for
our nonprime mortgage loans held for investment portfolio,
including those held in on-balance sheet securitization trusts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of total
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
$10,202
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
$12,014
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
$35,481
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Past due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 to 59 days
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
60 to 89 days
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
90 days or more
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
2,183
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Foreclosures pending
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Bankruptcies
|
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unpaid principal balances
|
|
|
|
15,462
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
17,747
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
47,513
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Net (discounts) premiums
|
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 159 fair value adjustment
|
|
|
|
(5,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$9,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$16,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$47,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
We originate and purchase mortgage loans that have contractual
features that may increase our exposure to credit risk and
thereby result in a concentration of credit risk. These mortgage
loans include loans that may subject borrowers to significant
future payment increases, create the potential for negative
amortization of the principal balance, or result in high
loan-to-value ratios. These loan products include interest only
mortgages, option adjustable rate mortgages, high loan-to-value
mortgage loans, and teaser rate mortgages. Total loan production
and combined exposure related to these products recorded in
finance receivables and loans and loans held for sale for the
three months ended and as of March 31, 2008 and 2007,
is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production for the
|
|
|
three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Interest-only mortgage loans
|
|
|
$1,784
|
|
|
|
$9,845
|
|
|
|
Payment option adjustable rate mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,515
|
|
|
|
High loan-to-value (100% or more) mortgage loans
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
|
|
Below market initial rate (teaser) mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
52
Insurance
Operations
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes the operating results of our
Insurance operations for the periods shown. The amounts
presented are before the elimination of balances and
transactions with our other operating segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-2007
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and service revenue earned
|
|
|
|
$1,097
|
|
|
|
|
$1,032
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premiums and other income
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Acquisition and underwriting expense
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
$132
|
|
|
|
|
$143
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
$13,730
|
|
|
|
|
$12,878
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and service revenue written
|
|
|
|
$1,133
|
|
|
|
|
$1,070
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio (a)
|
|
|
|
93.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
91.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Management uses the combined ratio as a primary measure of
underwriting profitability with its components measured using
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Underwriting profitability is indicated by a combined
ratio under 100% and is calculated as the sum of all incurred
losses and expenses (excluding interest and income tax expense)
divided by the total of premiums and service revenues earned and
other income.
|
Net income from Insurance operations totaled $132 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
$143 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. Net income for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, decreased due to unfavorable
underwriting results primarily driven by increases in expenses,
particularly sales and marketing related, for growth initiatives
in the U.S. personal insurance and vehicle service contract
business.
Insurance premiums and service revenue earned totaled
$1.1 billion for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $1.0 billion for the
same period in 2007. Insurance premiums and service revenues
earned increased slightly for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, primarily due to growth in
International operations, both organically and through the
acquisition of Provident Insurance in June 2007. The increase
was partially offset by challenging conditions in the domestic
vehicle service contract, personal insurance, and reinsurance
businesses.
The combination of investment and other income increased 7% in
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
same period in 2007. The increase was driven by an increase in
other income primarily due to higher service fees obtained from
acquisitions made for international operations and a sale of a
book of personal insurance business.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses totaled
$627 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $573 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. Losses and loss
53
adjustment expenses increased primarily due to international
operations, including Provident Insurance, and organic growth in
other international businesses. The increase was partially
offset by lower loss experience in our U.S. vehicle service
contract and personal insurance businesses, driven by lower
volumes.
Acquisition and underwriting expense increased 11% for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the same
period in 2007. The increase was due to an increase in both the
U.S. vehicle service contract and personal lines businesses due
to the buildup of our insurance sales force to expand beyond the
traditional customer base and continued growth in international
business, including the Provident Insurance acquisition and
organic growth.
On April 8, 2008, we announced that we are
implementing a plan related to GMACI Holdings LLC (GMACI), the
holding company for our Insurance operations, in the interest of
maintaining its current financial strength rating. The plan
contemplates a dividend by us of 100% of the voting interest of
GMACI to the current holders of our common membership equity,
which include FIM Holdings and subsidiaries of GM. The
dividend will be pro rata in accordance with the current common
equity ownership percentages held by these entities. We will
continue to hold 100% of the economic interests in GMACI. The
plan is subject to internal and regulatory approvals, and even
if implemented, there can be no assurances that it would result
in maintaining the current rating.
Other
Operations
Other operations experienced a net loss of $120 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to net
income of $64 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The decrease in net income was
primarily due to increased interest expense for corporate
activities due to increased borrowings, decreased profitability
of our Commercial Finance Group, and a loss from our equity
investment in Capmark (our former commercial mortgage
operation). We experienced a net loss of $41 million in our
equity investment from Capmark for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to a net income of
$41 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. This decrease was primarily caused by
a decline in credit market conditions and losses related to
asset revaluations. The overall decline was partially offset by
an $8 million gain recognized on the repurchase of ResCap
debt.
Net income of our Commercial Finance Group was $9 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
net income of $20 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The decrease in net income was
primarily due to an increase in interest expense, as a result of
higher asset levels, higher interest spreads, and the absence of
a $12 million favorable net income impact recognized during
February 2007 relating to the sale of certain loans.
Funding
and Liquidity
Funding
Strategy
Our liquidity and our ongoing profitability are largely
dependent upon our timely access to capital and the costs
associated with raising funds in different segments of the
capital markets. The goal of liquidity management is to provide
adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand, debt
maturities, and unexpected deposit withdrawals. Our primary
funding objective is to ensure that we have adequate, reliable
access to liquidity throughout all market cycles, including
periods of financial distress. We actively manage our liquidity
and mitigate our funding risk using the following practices:
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining diversified sources of funding
Over the past several years, our strategy has focused on
diversification of our funding. We have developed diversified
funding sources across a global investor base, both public and
private, and, as appropriate, extended debt maturities. This
diversification has been achieved in a variety of ways and in a
variety of markets, including whole-loan sales, the public and
private debt capital markets, and asset-backed facilities, as
well as through deposit-gathering and other financing
activities. The diversity of our funding sources enhances
funding flexibility, limits dependence on any one source of
funds, and results in a more cost effective strategy over the
long term. In developing diverse funding sources, management
considers market conditions, prevailing interest
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
rates, liquidity needs, and the desired maturity profile of our
liabilities. This strategy has helped us maintain liquidity
during periods of weakness in the capital markets, changes in
our business, and changes in our credit ratings. More
specifically, our development of secured funding alternatives
has been critical, as we have been unable to access the
long-term unsecured markets in a cost-effective manner due to
our weakened credit rating and recent performance, as well as
the ongoing difficulties in the credit markets. Despite our
diverse funding sources and strategies, our ability to maintain
liquidity may be affected by certain risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obtaining sufficient short- and long-term
financing We have significant short- and
long-term financing needs. We monitor the duration profile of
our assets and then establish an appropriate liability maturity
ladder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term financing We require short-term
funding to finance our short-duration assets, such as loans held
for sale, dealer floor plan receivables, and advances against
factoring receivables. We regularly forecast our cash position
and our potential funding needs, taking into account debt
maturities and potential peak balance sheet levels over a
medium-term time horizon.
|
|
|
|
Long-term financing Our long-term unsecured
financings fund long-term assets, such as mortgages held for
investment, retail auto contracts and leases, and equity
interests in securitizations, and over-collateralization
required to support our structured financing facilities. We
regularly assess the term structure of our assets and
liabilities and interest rate risk. In addition, we manage our
long-term debt maturities and credit facility expirations to
minimize refinancing risk and maturity concentrations. We
consider the available capacity and relative cost given market
constraints, as well as the potential impact on our credit
ratings. We meet our long-term financing needs from a variety of
sources including public corporate debt, credit facilities,
secured financings, off-balance sheet securitizations, and
whole-loan sales. In the current credit environment, our access
to long-term financing has been limited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimizing our use of secured funding
programs Depending on the structure, secured
funding may reduce our risk exposure to the underlying assets.
Given these benefits, we have developed meaningful sources of
funding in the asset-backed securities markets. We rely heavily
on whole-loan sales and securitizations to fund our mortgage and
automotive originations. As in the unsecured markets, we have
experienced significant price increases, as well as higher
levels of credit enhancements for several fundings.
|
|
|
|
Balancing access to liquidity and cost of
funding Maintaining sufficient access to
liquidity is vital to our business. Given our current credit
ratings, we have conservatively maintained large and varied
sources of liquidity. We have established a number of committed
liquidity facilities that provide further protection against
market volatility or disruptions. We regularly evaluate the cost
of the cash portfolio and committed facilities compared to the
potential risks and adjusts capacity levels according to market
conditions and our credit profile.
|
|
|
|
Maintaining an active dialogue with the rating
agencies The cost and availability of most
funding are influenced by credit ratings, which are intended to
be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a particular company,
security, or obligation. Lower ratings generally result in
higher unsecured borrowing costs, as well as reduced access to
unsecured capital markets. This is particularly true for certain
institutional investors, such as money market investors, whose
investment guidelines require investment-grade ratings in the
two highest rating categories for short-term debt. Substantially
all our debt has been rated by nationally recognized statistical
rating organizations. We maintain an active dialogue with each
rating agency throughout the year.
|
Recent
Funding Developments
As the credit markets continue to remain under pressure into
2008, our funding strategy remains unchanged as we remain
intensely focused on our liquidity position. Thus far in 2008,
our access to the public markets for automotive-related,
asset-backed securities has been challenged. In addition, we are
currently working with our credit providers on modifications to
existing facilities to ensure adequate liquidity. This
55
could include the modification of existing GMAC secured and
unsecured credit facilities, including the potential conversion
of certain unsecured revolving credit facilities to a secured
facility.
ResCaps liquidity was negatively impacted due to reduced
commitment levels and lower effective advance rates of its
secured committed sources of liquidity. Many ResCap secured
committed facilities experienced shorter dated extensions than
in the past. To meet its liquidity demands thus far in 2008,
some of the more significant events with respect to GMAC and
ResCap include those described below.
On February 21, 2008, we entered into a secured credit
agreement with Residential Funding Company, LLC (RFC), a
subsidiary of ResCap, to provide RFC with a revolving credit
facility with a principal amount of up to $750.0 million.
To secure the obligations of RFC under the credit agreement, RFC
has pledged to us as collateral under a pledge agreement, among
other things, its membership interest in RFC Resort Funding,
LLC, a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary of RFC, certain
loans made by RFC to resort developers secured by time-share
loans or agreements to purchase timeshares and certain loans
made by RFC to resort developers to fund construction of resorts
and resort-related facilities and all collections with respect
to the pledged loans. This funding is supplemental to existing
third party financing for the Resort Finance business. On
February 21, 2008, RFC borrowed $635.0 million under
the credit agreement maturing on August 21, 2009, and
subsequently drew an additional $20.0 million in March 2008.
On March 31, 2008, we contributed notes of ResCap that we
had previously purchased in open market purchase transactions
with a face amount of approximately $1.2 billion and a fair
value of approximately $607.2 million to ResCap in exchange
for 607,192 ResCap preferred units with a liquidation preference
of $1,000 per unit. The ResCap preferred units are exchangeable
at our option on a unit-for-unit basis into preferred membership
interests in IB Finance Holding Company, LLC (IB Finance) at any
time after January 1, 2009, so long as neither ResCap
nor any of its significant subsidiaries was the subject of any
bankruptcy proceeding on or before that date. The ResCap
preferred units have no voting rights, except as required by
law, and are not transferable by us to any party other than a
wholly-owned affiliate of GMAC without the consent of
ResCaps board of directors, including a majority of the
independent directors. The IB Finance preferred units are
redeemable at the option of ResCaps independent directors
on any preferred distribution payment date in whole or in part
for 100% of their liquidation preference plus any authorized but
unpaid distributions on the IB Finance preferred units. We are
currently in negotiations with ResCap for us to contribute to
ResCap by May 31, 2008 an additional $350.0 million
principal amount of outstanding ResCap that we hold in exchange
for additional ResCap preferred units.
On April 18, 2008, we entered into a loan and security
agreement maturing on October 17, 2008 with RFC and GMAC
Mortgage, LLC to provide $750 million to fund mortgage
servicing rights. To secure the obligations of RFC and GMAC
Mortgage under the loan and security agreement, RFC and GMAC
Mortgage have pledged to us as collateral their servicing rights
and related contractual rights under certain pooling and
servicing agreements and loan servicing agreements with respect
to pools of first- and second-lien mortgage loans and home
equity lines of credit. ResCap guarantees the prompt payment of
the obligations of RFC and GMAC Mortgage under the loan and
security agreement. Upon execution, both ResCap entities drew a
combined advance of $468 million, which in turn indirectly
paid down intercompany debt owed to ResCap.
ResCap is conducting debt tender and exchange offers for its
outstanding unsecured notes to improve its financial flexibility
by extending the maturities of such indebtedness and reducing
its overall indebtedness. ResCap is offering eligible holders of
2008-2009
notes and
2010-2015
notes the ability to exchange such notes for one of two
newly-issued series of notes of ResCap, and holders of the
floating rate notes maturing in June 2008 the ability to tender
such old notes for cash. In addition, eligible holders
participating in the exchange offers may elect to receive cash
in lieu of new notes that they would otherwise receive pursuant
to a Modified Dutch Auction process. The new notes
would be secured by a second or third priority lien on the
assets that would secure the proposed senior secured credit
facility between GMAC and ResCap.
We are in negotiations to provide ResCap with a new
$3.5 billion senior secured credit facility, which would be
used to fund the cash required for the offers described above,
to repay ResCaps term loan maturing in July 2008 and to
replace ResCaps $875.0 million
364-day
revolving bank credit facility and its $875.0 million
3-year
revolving bank credit facility. Such facility would be secured
by a first priority lien in
56
substantially all of ResCaps existing and after-acquired
unencumbered assets remaining available to be pledged as
collateral. Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., or its designee
(Cerberus), and GM, or its designee, propose and are in
discussions to acquire an aggregate $750 million first loss
participation in the proposed senior secured facility, which
participation would be allocated on a pro rata basis between
Cerberus and GM.
ResCap is seeking amendments to substantially all of its secured
bilateral facilities that would extend the maturities of such
facilities from various dates in 2008 to May 2009 and eliminate
or modify the tangible net worth covenant contained in such
facilities. Although some of ResCaps secured facilities
have been extended during 2008, the extensions have generally
been for periods shorter than such facilities previous
terms. Between April 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008,
ResCap has $28.8 billion, or 98%, of its secured committed
capacity maturing.
ResCap is seeking approximately $150.0 million in
additional borrowings under one of its existing secured
facilities with GMAC, the availability of which is subject to
ResCap meeting certain conditions.
Even if ResCap is successful in implementing all of the actions
described above, it will be required, in order to satisfy its
liquidity needs and comply with anticipated covenants to be
included in its new debt agreements requiring maintenance of
minimum cash balances, to consummate in the near term certain
asset sales or other capital generating actions over and above
its normal mortgage finance activities to provide additional
cash of approximately $600 million by June 30, 2008.
This additional cash required is solely an estimate based upon
internal monthly cash forecasts targeting sufficient cash
surpluses to prudently operate ResCaps business and remain
in excess of its anticipated cash covenants. Asset liquidation
initiatives may include, among other things, sale of retained
interest in ResCaps mortgage securitizations, marketing of
loans secured by time-share receivables, marketing of
ResCaps United Kingdom and Continental Europe mortgage
loan portfolios, whole loan sales and marketing of businesses
and platforms that are unrelated to ResCaps core mortgage
finance business. Moreover, the amount of liquidity ResCap needs
may be greater than currently anticipated as a result of
additional factors and events (such as interest rate
fluctuations and margin calls) that increase ResCaps cash
needs causing it to be unable to independently satisfy its
near-term liquidity requirements.
Cash
Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.1 billion
for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to
$4.9 billion for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. Net cash used by operating activities
primarily includes cash used for the origination and purchase of
certain mortgage and automotive loans held for sale and the cash
proceeds from the sales of, and principal repayments on, such
loans. Our ability to originate and sell mortgage loans at
previously experienced volumes has been hindered by continued
pressure in the U.S. housing market and certain foreign mortgage
and capital markets. Cash flows from operating activities
declined as a result of additional net purchases of automotive
loans held for sale and decreased levels of cash flows from
collections and sales of mortgage loans held for sale as
compared to the same period of the prior year.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.8 billion for
the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to a
source of cash of $2.1 billion for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The decrease in net cash provided by
investing activities was attributable to a reduction in the
level of sales of finance receivables held for investment during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to
the same period during 2007.
Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2008, totaled $1 billion, compared to
$12.8 billion for the three months ended
March 31, 2007. This change was largely related to
decreased levels of long-term debt repayments during the three
months ended March 31, 2008, as compared to the same
period during 2007. Additionally, borrowings from certificates
of deposit and brokered deposits increased as part of our
diversified funding strategy. These increases in cash from
financing activities were partially offset by increased
repayments of short-term debt and decreases in the level of new
long-term debt issuance due to lower levels of mortgage loan
production.
57
We believe existing cash and investment balances, funding
activities, as well as cash flows from operations, will be
adequate to meet GMACs capital and liquidity needs during
the next twelve months. However, if the various plans described
in this Form
10-Q related
to ResCaps specific liquidity requirements are not
successful, it could impact GMACs capital and liquidity
position.
Funding
Sources
The following table summarizes debt and other sources of funding
by source and the amount outstanding under each category for the
periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
($ in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
$1,657
|
|
|
|
$1,439
|
|
Institutional term debt
|
|
|
59,297
|
|
|
|
61,457
|
|
Retail debt programs
|
|
|
25,134
|
|
|
|
26,175
|
|
Secured financings
|
|
|
85,470
|
|
|
|
90,809
|
|
Bank loans and other
|
|
|
12,556
|
|
|
|
12,697
|
|
|
|
Total debt (a)
|
|
|
184,114
|
|
|
|
192,577
|
|
Bank deposits (b)
|
|
|
16,221
|
|
|
|
13,708
|
|
Off-balance sheet securitizations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail finance receivables
|
|
|
13,997
|
|
|
|
14,328
|
|
Wholesale loans
|
|
|
15,439
|
|
|
|
16,813
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
156,921
|
|
|
|
136,108
|
|
|
|
Total funding
|
|
|
386,692
|
|
|
|
373,534
|
|
Less: consolidated cash, cash equivalents, and certain
marketable securities (c)
|
|
|
(18,632
|
)
|
|
|
(22,706
|
)
|
|
|
Net funding
|
|
|
$368,060
|
|
|
|
$350,828
|
|
|
Leverage ratio covenant (d)
|
|
|
8.5:1
|
|
|
|
8.5:1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Excludes fair value adjustment as described in Note 6 to
our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
(b)
|
Includes consumer and commercial bank deposits and dealer
wholesale deposits.
|
|
(c)
|
Includes $14.8 billion in cash and cash equivalents and
$3.8 billion invested in certain marketable securities at
March 31, 2008, and $17.7 billion in cash and
cash equivalents and $5.0 billion invested in certain
marketable securities at December 31, 2007.
|
|
(d)
|
Our credit facilities include a leverage covenant that restricts
the ratio of consolidated borrowed funds (excluding certain
obligations of bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose entities) to
consolidated net worth (including the existing preferred
membership interests) to be no greater than 11.0:1 under certain
conditions. The leverage ratio covenant excludes from debt,
securitization transactions that are accounted for on-balance
sheet as secured financings totaling $59,193 million and
$60,898 million at March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
|
Short-term
Debt
We obtain short-term funding from the sale of floating-rate
demand notes under a program referred to as GMAC LLC Demand
Notes. These notes can be redeemed at any time at the option of
the holder thereof without restriction. Our domestic and
international unsecured and secured commercial paper programs
also provide short-term funding, as do short-term bank loans.
While we attempt to stagger the maturities of our short-term
funding sources to reduce refinancing risk, this has become more
difficult given the current credit market environment.
As of March 31, 2008, we had $30.3 billion in
short-term debt outstanding. Refer to Note 6 to our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information about our outstanding short-term debt.
Long-term
Unsecured Debt
We meet our long-term financing needs from a variety of sources,
including unsecured debt and credit facilities. Historically,
the unsecured debt markets were a key source of financing for
us. However, given our
58
current ratings profile, we have not been able to access the
unsecured debt markets in a cost-effective manner. During the
three months ended March 31, 2008, we did not issue
unsecured debt in the capital markets.
The following table presents the scheduled maturity of unsecured
long-term debt at March 31, 2008, assuming that no
early redemptions occur:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Finance operations
(a)
|
|
ResCap
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$11,167
|
|
|
|
$3,849
|
|
|
|
$15,016
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
12,455
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
9,872
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
12,258
|
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
13,544
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
7,679
|
|
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
18,586
|
|
|
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
22,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured long-term debt (b)
|
|
|
67,022
|
|
|
|
16,153
|
|
|
|
83,175
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total unsecured long-term debt
|
|
|
$66,753
|
|
|
|
$16,143
|
|
|
|
$82,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Consists of debt we or our subsidiaries incur to finance our
Global Automotive Finance operations.
|
|
(b)
|
Debt issues totaling $13.9 billion are redeemable at or
above par, at our option anytime prior to the scheduled maturity
dates, the latest of which is November 2049.
|
Secured
Financings and Off-balance Sheet Securitizations
As part of our ongoing funding and risk management practices, we
have established secondary market trading and securitization
arrangements that provide long-term financing primarily for our
automotive and mortgage loans. We have had consistent and
reliable access to these markets through our securitization
activities in the past. However, given current market
conditions, our access to the asset-backed securities market has
been challenged. In the near term, there remains a limited
access for certain securitizations, especially those that are
supported by nonagency mortgage assets.
For the first three months of 2008, more than 96% of our North
American Automotive Finance operations volume was funded through
secured funding arrangements or automotive whole-loan sales. In
the three months ended March 31, 2008, our North
American Automotive Finance operations executed approximately
$2.5 billion in automotive whole-loan sales and off-balance
sheet securitizations. In addition, our North American
Automotive Finance operations executed approximately
$6.0 billion in secured funding during the quarter. Our
International Automotive Finance operations funds approximately
30% of its operations through securitizations and other forms of
secured funding.
59
The following table summarizes assets that are restricted as
collateral for the payment of related debt obligations. These
restrictions primarily arise from securitization transactions
accounted for as secured borrowings and repurchase agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related secured
|
|
|
|
Related secured
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Assets
|
|
debt (a)
|
|
Assets
|
|
debt (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
$9,135
|
|
|
|
$5,154
|
|
|
|
$10,437
|
|
|
|
$6,765
|
|
|
|
Mortgage assets held for investment and lending receivables
|
|
|
39,237
|
|
|
|
25,720
|
|
|
|
45,534
|
|
|
|
33,911
|
|
|
|
Retail automotive finance receivables
|
|
|
24,720
|
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
|
|
23,079
|
|
|
|
19,094
|
|
|
|
Commercial automotive finance receivables
|
|
|
11,522
|
|
|
|
9,528
|
|
|
|
10,092
|
|
|
|
7,709
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
Investment in operating leases, net
|
|
|
24,440
|
|
|
|
19,470
|
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
|
|
17,926
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments and other assets
|
|
|
13,722
|
|
|
|
4,547
|
|
|
|
14,429
|
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$123,245
|
|
|
|
$85,470
|
|
|
|
$124,558
|
|
|
|
$90,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Included as part of secured debt are repurchase agreements of
$2.7 billion and $3.6 billion where we have pledged
assets as collateral for approximately the same amount of debt
at March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
|
Bank
Deposits
We accept commercial and consumer deposits through GMAC Bank in
the United States. The main sources of deposits for GMAC Bank
are certificates of deposit and brokered deposits. As of
March 31, 2008, GMAC Bank had approximately
$15.3 billion of deposits, compared to $12.8 billion
as of December 31, 2007. We also have banking
operations in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, France, Germany, and
Poland that fund automotive assets. Some of these operations
utilize certificates of deposit for local funding.
Funding
Facilities
The following table highlights committed, uncommitted, and total
capacity under our secured and unsecured funding facilities as
of March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
The financial institutions providing the uncommitted facilities
are not legally obligated to advance funds under them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity facilities
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
Committed
|
|
Uncommitted
|
|
Total
|
|
Committed
|
|
Uncommitted
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured funding facilities
|
|
|
$12.7
|
|
|
|
$9.4
|
|
|
|
$22.1
|
|
|
|
$12.7
|
|
|
|
$10.5
|
|
|
|
$23.2
|
|
|
|
Secured funding facilities
|
|
|
129.4
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
151.2
|
|
|
|
141.2
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
162.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funding facilities
|
|
|
$142.1
|
|
|
|
$31.2
|
|
|
|
$173.3
|
|
|
|
$153.9
|
|
|
|
$32.1
|
|
|
|
$186.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
Unsecured
Funding Facilities
The following table summarizes our unsecured committed capacity
as of March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured committed facilities
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility 364 day
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$3.0
|
|
|
|
$3.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$3.0
|
|
|
|
$3.0
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility multi-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
International bank lines
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
ResCap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility 364 day
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility multi-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Bank term loans
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ResCap
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
Commercial Finance operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$3.8
|
|
|
|
$8.9
|
|
|
|
$12.7
|
|
|
|
$3.7
|
|
|
|
$9.0
|
|
|
|
$12.7
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities As of
March 31, 2008, we had four unsecured syndicated bank
facilities totaling approximately $7.8 billion. GMAC
maintains a $6.0 billion of unsecured revolving credit
facilities, including a $3.0 billion
364-day
facility that matures in June 2008 and a $3.0 billion
5-year term
facility that matures in June 2012. ResCap also maintains
$1.75 billion of unsecured revolving credit facilities,
including an $875 million
364-day
facility that matures in June 2008 and an $875 million
3-year term
facility that matures in June 2010. The
364-day
facilities for both GMAC and ResCap include a term-out option,
which, if exercised by us prior to expiration, carries a
one-year term.
The GMAC credit facilities include a leverage covenant that
restricts the ratio of consolidated borrowed funds (excluding
certain obligations of bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose
entities) to consolidated net worth (including the existing
preferred membership interests) to be no greater than 11.0:1,
under certain conditions. More specifically, the covenant is
only applicable on the last day of any fiscal quarter (other
than the fiscal quarter during which a change in rating occurs)
during such times that we have senior, unsecured, long-term debt
outstanding without third-party enhancement, which is rated BBB+
or less (by Standard & Poors) or Baa1 or
less (by Moodys).
Our leverage ratio covenant was 8.5:1 at
March 31, 2008; therefore, we are in compliance with
this covenant as of this date.
ResCap maintains $3.5 billion of unsecured syndicated bank
facilities, $1.8 billion of which is a syndicated term loan
committed through July 2008. These credit facilities each
contain a financial covenant, among other covenants, requiring
ResCap to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth (as
defined
61
in each respective agreement) as of the end of each fiscal
quarter. Under the agreements, ResCaps tangible net worth
cannot fall below a base amount plus an amount equal to 25% of
ResCap net income (if positive) for the fiscal year since the
closing date of the applicable agreement. As of
March 31, 2008, the most restrictive provision
requires a minimum tangible net worth of $5.4 billion.
ResCaps reported tangible net worth as of
March 31, 2008 was $5.7 billion.
ResCaps consolidated tangible net worth fluctuates based
on a number of factors, principally its operating results.
ResCap monitors its compliance with the minimum consolidated
tangible net worth covenant and maintains contingency plans to
enable it to meet these terms should corrective action become
necessary. Those plans include a potential capital infusion
(cash or other) from GMAC, asset sales, and debt reduction
activities, among other alternatives. If any of these actions or
alternative actions are undertaken, there is also no assurance
that they will be successful or that, absent undertaking any
such activities, an amendment or waiver of the covenants could
be obtained from the lenders.
International bank lines We maintain
committed unsecured bilateral bank facilities in various
countries to finance our Global Automotive Finance operations. A
majority of these facilities have a tenor of 364 days while
there are other facilities with longer tenors.
Other Our Commercial Finance and Insurance
operations utilize letters of credit for certain aspects of
their respective businesses.
The following table summarizes our unsecured uncommitted
capacity as of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured uncommitted facilities
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit Europe
|
|
|
$4.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$4.3
|
|
|
|
$4.7
|
|
|
|
$0.4
|
|
|
|
$5.1
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit Latin America
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
ResCap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
GMAC Bank: Fed Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ResCap
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Finance operations
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$8.6
|
|
|
|
$0.8
|
|
|
|
$9.4
|
|
|
|
$8.9
|
|
|
|
$1.6
|
|
|
|
$10.5
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit Our Global Automotive Finance
and Commercial Finance operations utilize uncommitted bank lines
as a funding source for their international businesses. The
outstanding amounts are mainly short-term loans. ResCaps
lines of credit are used for general working capital purposes
and have short-term maturities.
62
Secured
Funding Facilities
The following table shows the amount outstanding, unused, and
total capacity under our secured committed facilities as of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured committed facilities
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
|
Global Automotive Finance operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whole-loan forward flow agreements
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$30.8
|
|
|
|
$30.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$37.4
|
|
|
|
$37.4
|
|
|
|
New Center Asset Trust (NCAT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
U.S. facilities
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
Variable note funding facility
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
International facilities
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Global Automotive Finance operations
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
80.8
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
|
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
ResCap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
Receivables Lending Agreement (RLA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Asset Lending Agreement (MALA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Facilities for construction lending receivables
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
Facilities for mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ResCap
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
29.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bilateral secured
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
Commercial Finance operations
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$57.8
|
|
|
|
$71.6
|
|
|
|
$129.4
|
|
|
|
$56.9
|
|
|
|
$84.3
|
|
|
|
$141.2
|
|
|
|
|
Whole-loan forward flow agreements
Commitments to purchase U.S. automotive retail assets. One of
our long-term strategic financing agreements includes a
commitment from a financial institution to purchase up to
$10.0 billion of U.S. retail auto finance contracts every
year through June 2010. There is $25.0 billion of capacity
under this funding arrangement as of March 31, 2008.
Our other long-term strategic financing agreement provides
funding of up to $5.8 billion through October 2010.
NCAT NCAT is a special-purpose entity
administered by us for the purpose of funding assets as part of
our securitization funding programs. This entity funds assets
primarily through the issuance of asset-backed commercial paper,
and it represents an important source of liquidity to us. At
March 31, 2008, NCAT had commercial paper outstanding
of $7.8 billion, which is not included on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Global Automotive Finance operations secured facilities
(United States and International) These are
primarily bank conduit facilities that permanently fund a
specific pool of assets. Certain facilities are
63
revolving and, therefore, allow for the funding of additional
assets during the commitment period, usually 364 days.
Internationally, there are also secured bank lines that provided
$1.5 billion of total capacity at March 31, 2008.
Variable note funding facility This facility
was restructured and renewed for the full amount and with full
bank participation and is available to fund U.S. dealer
floor plan receivables at all times. It is also available in the
event of GM filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.
Repurchase agreements ResCap has developed
numerous relationships with banks and securities firms to
provide funding for mortgage loans and securities through
repurchase agreements and other similar arrangements on a
domestic and international basis. Borrowings under these
agreements are provided on either a committed or an uncommitted
basis.
MALA and RLA The Mortgage Asset Lending
Agreement, or MALA, is a secured aggregation facility that funds
residential mortgage loans during the aggregation period. The
facility receives funding from a syndicate of asset-backed
commercial paper vehicles. MALA shares a funding commitment with
Receivables Lending Agreement, or RLA, a facility that funds our
warehouse lending receivables via a syndicate of asset-backed
commercial paper vehicles. The MALA and RLA facilities have both
short- and long-term commitments. The two facilities had
aggregate liquidity commitments of $8.7 billion as of
March 31, 2008, composed of a one-year commitment of
$2.2 billion that matures May 2008 and a three-year
commitment of $6.5 billion that matures November 2008. The
minimal borrowings under these facilities generally reflect the
continuing disruptions in the asset-backed commercial paper
markets, which have made borrowings under this facility less
available and more expensive. Due to changes in ResCaps
business model as well as asset concentration limits in the RLA
facility, we do not anticipate having significant borrowings
under these facilities in the near term and may be restricted
from borrowing under either of these facilities.
Other Other secured facilities include
certain facilities to fund mortgage loans prior to their sale or
securitization. Internationally, this includes $6.4 billion
of liquidity commitments to fund loans in the United Kingdom;
$1.0 billion of liquidity commitments to fund loans
originated in the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain; a
$690 million liquidity commitment to fund loans in
Australia; and a $66 million liquidity commitment to fund
loans in Mexico. Domestically, other secured facilities to fund
mortgage servicing advances have capacity of $700 million
as of March 31, 2008.
Bilateral secured facility Effective
September 6, 2007, we entered into an agreement with
Citi, pursuant to which we have access to up to
$21.4 billion in various asset-backed funding facilities
(the Facilities) through at least September 2008. A total of
$14.4 billion is available for immediate funding with the
additional $7.0 billion becoming available to the extent
the Facilities are syndicated to other lenders. As of
March 31, 2008, $11.3 billion was utilized to
fund automotive assets while ResCap, and Commercial Finance had
$1.0 billion and $1.5 billion outstanding,
respectively. Of these funded amounts, a total of
$1.8 billion is syndicated to financial institutions other
than Citi. In light of recent credit rating agency events, the
lender has the right to reduce the commitment of its loan
agreement to fund mortgage servicing rights to an amount no less
than $1.0 billion (decrease of $0.5 billion). As a
result, we have disclosed $0.5 billion of the secured
capacity as uncommitted capacity.
Commercial Finance operations Maintains
conduits to fund trade receivables.
64
The following table shows the amount outstanding, unused, and
total capacity under our secured uncommitted facilities as of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured uncommitted facilities
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
capacity
|
|
capacity
|
|
|
|
ResCap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
$0.1
|
|
|
|
$7.1
|
|
|
|
$7.2
|
|
|
|
$0.4
|
|
|
|
$7.4
|
|
|
|
$7.8
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bilateral secured facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$11.2
|
|
|
|
$10.6
|
|
|
|
$21.8
|
|
|
|
$12.1
|
|
|
|
$9.5
|
|
|
|
$21.6
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB Advances GMAC Bank has entered into an
advances agreement with Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). Under the
agreement, as of March 31, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, GMAC Bank had assets pledged and
restricted as collateral totaling $30.3 billion and
$28.4 billion under the FHLBs existing blanket lien
on all GMAC Bank assets. However, the FHLB will allow GMAC Bank
to encumber any assets restricted as collateral not needed to
collateralize existing FHLB advances. As of
March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, GMAC
Bank had $15.3 and $12.8 billion of assets restricted as
collateral that were available to be encumbered elsewhere.
Credit
Ratings
The cost and availability of unsecured financing are influenced
by credit ratings, which are intended to be an indicator of the
creditworthiness of a particular company, security, or
obligation. Lower ratings generally result in higher borrowing
costs as well as reduced access to capital markets. This is
particularly true for certain institutional investors whose
investment guidelines require investment-grade ratings on term
debt and the two highest rating categories for short-term debt
(particularly money market investors).
Substantially all our debt has been rated by nationally
recognized statistical rating organizations. The following table
summarizes our current ratings and outlook by the respective
nationally recognized rating agencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
agency
|
|
paper
|
|
debt
|
|
Outlook
|
|
last action
|
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
B
|
|
B+
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
May 2, 2008 (a)
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Not-Prime
|
|
B2
|
|
Watch-Negative
|
|
|
April 23, 2008 (b)
|
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
C
|
|
B
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
April 24, 2008 (c)
|
|
|
|
DBRS
|
|
R-4
|
|
BB (low)
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
April 29, 2008 (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Fitch downgraded our senior debt to B+ from BB-, affirmed the
commercial paper rating of B, and maintained the outlook at
Negative on May 2, 2008. Separately, on May 2,
2008, Fitch lowered our long-term Issuer Default Rating to BB-
from BB.
|
|
(b)
|
Moodys downgraded our senior debt to B2 from B1, affirmed
the commercial paper rating of Not-Prime, and changed the
outlook to Watch-Negative on April 23, 2008.
|
|
(c)
|
Standard & Poors downgraded our senior debt
to B from B+, affirmed the commercial paper rating of C, and
maintained the
outlook at negative on April 24, 2008.
|
|
(d)
|
DBRS downgraded our senior debt to BB (low) from BB (high),
affirmed the commercial paper rating of R-4, and maintained the
outlook at Negative on April 29, 2008.
|
65
In addition, ResCap, our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, has
ratings (separate from GMAC) from the nationally recognized
rating agencies. The following table summarizes ResCaps
current ratings and outlook by the respective agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
agency
|
|
paper
|
|
debt
|
|
Outlook
|
|
last action
|
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
C
|
|
C
|
|
Watch-Negative
|
|
|
May 2, 2008 (a)
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Not-Prime
|
|
Ca
|
|
Watch-Negative
|
|
|
May 2, 2008 (b)
|
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
C
|
|
CC
|
|
Watch-Negative
|
|
|
May 2, 2008 (c)
|
|
|
|
DBRS
|
|
R-5
|
|
CCC
|
|
Under Review-Negative
|
|
|
May 5, 2008 (d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Fitch downgraded ResCaps senior debt to C from BB-,
downgraded the commercial paper rating to C from B, and
maintained the outlook at Watch-Negative on
May 2, 2008.
|
|
(b)
|
Moodys downgraded ResCaps senior debt to Ca from
Caal, affirmed the commercial paper rating of Not-Prime, and
changed the outlook to Watch-Negative on May 2, 2008.
|
|
(c)
|
Standard & Poors downgraded ResCaps
senior debt to CC from CCC+, affirmed the commercial paper
rating of C, and
maintained the outlook at Watch-Negative on
May 2, 2008.
|
|
(d)
|
DBRS downgraded ResCaps senior debt to CCC from B (low),
affirmed the commercial paper rating of R-5, and changed the
outlook to Under Review-Negative on May 5, 2008.
|
Off-balance
Sheet Arrangements
We use off-balance sheet entities as an integral part of our
operating and funding activities. For further discussion of our
use of off-balance sheet entities, refer to the Off-balance
Sheet Arrangements section in our 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes assets carried off-balance sheet
in these entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
($ in billions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Securitization (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail finance receivables
|
|
|
$15.3
|
|
|
|
$15.6
|
|
|
|
Wholesale loans
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
|
157.6
|
|
|
|
138.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total off-balance sheet activities
|
|
|
$189.8
|
|
|
|
$172.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes only securitizations accounted for as sales under
SFAS 140, as further described in Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
Critical
Accounting Estimates
We have identified critical accounting estimates that, as a
result of judgments, uncertainties, uniqueness, and complexities
of the underlying accounting standards and operations involved
could result in material changes to our financial condition,
results of operations, or cash flows under different conditions
or using different assumptions.
Our most critical accounting estimates are:
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
Determination of the allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
Valuation of automotive lease residuals
|
|
|
|
Valuation of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
|
Valuation of interests in securitized assets
|
|
|
|
Determination of reserves for insurance losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
66
Change in
Accounting Principle
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157) and Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159).
SFAS 157 applies to assets and liabilities required to be
measured at fair value under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP). SFAS 159 permits
entities to choose to measure at fair value many financial
instruments and certain other items that are not currently
required to be measured at fair value under GAAP. If an entity
elects fair value for a particular financial instrument under
SFAS 159, the fair value measurement is within scope of the
measurement and disclosure requirements of SFAS 157.
SFAS 157 provides a definition of fair value, established a
framework for measuring fair value, and establishes a
three-level hierarchy to be used when measuring and disclosing
fair value. An instruments categorization within the fair
value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant
input to its valuation. Below is a description of the three
hierarchy levels.
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities as of the measurement date. Additionally, the
entity must have the ability to access the active market and the
quoted prices cannot be adjusted by the entity.
|
|
|
Level 2
|
Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in inactive markets for
identical or similar assets or liabilities; or inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means for substantially the full term of
the assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity. The unobservable inputs represent managements
best assumptions of how market participants would price the
assets and liabilities. Generally, Level 3 assets and
liabilities are valued using price models, discounted cash flow
methodologies, or similar techniques that require significant
judgment or estimation.
|
We follow the fair value hierarchy set forth above in order to
prioritize the data utilized to measure fair value. We strive to
obtain quoted market prices in active markets (Level 1
inputs). If Level 1 inputs are not available, we will
attempt to obtain Level 2 inputs, observable market prices
in inactive markets or derive the fair value measurement using
observable market prices for similar assets or liabilities. When
neither Level 1 nor Level 2 inputs are available, we
use Level 3 inputs and internal valuation models to
estimate fair value measurements. At March 31, 2008,
approximately 17% of total assets, or $40.3 billion,
consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value.
Approximately 36% of the assets reported at fair value were
valued using Level 3 inputs. At March 31, 2008,
approximately 3% of total liabilities or $6.3 billion
consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value.
Approximately 79% of the liabilities reported at fair value were
valued using Level 3 inputs. See Note 10 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for descriptions of
valuation methodologies used to measure material assets and
liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models,
key inputs to those models, and significant assumptions utilized.
Due to the nature of ResCaps mortgage banking operations,
a large percentage of our fair value assets and liabilities are
Level 3. These mortgage banking operations can be broadly
described as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
ResCap enters into interest rate lock commitments with borrowers
or mortgage purchase commitments with correspondent lenders and
other sellers. These commitments typically are considered
derivative instruments under GAAP and are accounted for at fair
value. Due to the underlying attributes of these mortgage loan
commitments and that they do not trade in any market, these
derivatives typically are Level 3 items.
|
|
|
|
ResCap funds or purchases mortgage loans. We have not elected
fair value for our mortgage loans held for sale portfolio.
Rather, these loans are accounted for at lower of cost or market
under GAAP. The loans are valued differently depending on the
underlying characteristics of the loan. Generally speaking,
loans that will be sold to agencies and the majority of
international loans where recently negotiated
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
market prices for the pool exist with a counterparty are
Level 2, while domestic loans that cannot be sold to
agencies and delinquent loans are Level 3 due to lack of
observable market prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ResCap ultimately sells its mortgage loans included in the held
for sale portfolio, either to the agencies, to whole-loan
purchasers, or via off-balance sheet securitization structures.
When we sell loans into any of the three channels above, we
typically will retain servicing rights. We have opted to carry
our servicing rights at fair value under SFAS No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets. Further,
when the loans are sold into off-balance sheet securitizations,
we will often retain residual interests
and/or
certain classes of bonds. These retained bonds may include
interest-only strips, principal-only securities, or principal
and interest paying bonds (typically the subordinated bonds),
all of which are carried at fair value within investment
securities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Due to
the lack of observable market prices or data, our servicing
rights and retained residual interests typically are
Level 3 items.
|
|
|
|
ResCap has previously executed securitizations that have not
qualified for sale treatment under SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The collateral in these
securitizations are classified as loans held for investment and
related debt is recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. We have elected fair value for both the collateral and
debt in certain of these securitizations. Due to the
characteristics of the underlying loan collateral (nonprime and
home equities), the collateral and debt are both classified as
Level 3. Refer to Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
regarding the fair value election.
|
We also have certain operations outside our mortgage banking
activities that result in our holding Level 3 assets and
liabilities. These include on-balance sheet collateralized debt
obligation transactions, mortgage-backed and asset-backed
securities, and other financial instruments.
Due to the amount of our assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value, our balance sheet and income statement can be
significantly impacted by fluctuations in market prices. While
we execute various hedging strategies to mitigate our exposure
to changes in fair value, we cannot fully eliminate our exposure
to volatility caused by fluctuations in market prices. Beginning
in 2007 and continuing into 2008, the global credit markets have
experienced severe dislocation. Market demand for asset-backed
securities, particularly those backed by mortgage assets, has
significantly contracted and in many markets, has virtually
disappeared. Further, market demand for whole-loan purchases has
also contracted. These unprecedented market conditions have
adversely impacted us, and our competitors. As the market
conditions continue, our assets and liabilities are subject to
valuation adjustment, as well as changes in the inputs we
utilize to measure fair value.
We have numerous internal controls in place to ensure the
appropriateness of fair value measurements. Significant fair
value measures are subject to detailed analytics and management
review and approval. We have an established model validation
policy and program in place that covers all models used to
generate fair value measurements. This model validation program
ensures a controlled environment is used for the development,
implementation, and use of the models, as well as change
procedures. Further, this program uses a risk-based approach to
select models to be reviewed and validated by an independent
internal risk group to ensure the models are consistent with
their intended use, the logic within the models is reliable, and
the inputs and outputs from these models are appropriate.
Additionally, a wide array of operational controls are in place
to ensure the fair value measurements are reasonable, including
controls over the inputs into, and the outputs from, the fair
value measurement models. For example, we backtest the internal
assumptions used within models against actual performance. We
also monitor the market for recent trades, market surveys, or
other market information that may be used to benchmark model
inputs or outputs. Certain valuations will also be benchmarked
to market indices when appropriate and available. We have
scheduled model
and/or input
recalibrations that occur on a periodic basis but will
recalibrate earlier if significant variances are observed as
part of the backtesting or benchmarking noted above.
Considerable judgment is used in forming conclusions from market
observable data used to estimate our Level 2 fair value
measurements and in estimating inputs to our internal valuation
models used to estimate our Level 3 fair value
measurements. Level 3 inputs such as interest rate
movements, prepayment speeds, credit
68
losses, and discount rates are inherently difficult to estimate.
Changes to these inputs can have a significant affect on fair
value measurements. Accordingly, our estimates of fair value are
not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized
or would be paid in a current market exchange.
Besides elections made under SFAS 159, there have been no
significant changes in the methodologies and processes used in
developing these estimates from what was described in our 2007
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Refer to Note 1 and Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on
changes in accounting principle.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Forward
Looking Statements
The foregoing Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other portions
of this
Form 10-Q
contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning
of applicable federal securities laws, including the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based upon
our current expectations and assumptions concerning future
events, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated.
The words anticipate, estimate,
believe, expect, intend,
may, plan, project,
future, should, and any similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks,
uncertainties, and other factors, including (but not limited to)
the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of our 2007 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
as updated in subsequent reports on SEC
Forms 10-Q
and 8-K.
Such factors include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Rating agencies have recently downgraded their ratings for GMAC
and ResCap, and there could be further downgrades in the future.
Future downgrades would further adversely affect our ability to
raise capital in the debt markets at attractive rates and
increase the interest that we pay on new borrowings, which could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
|
|
Our business requires substantial capital, and, if we are unable
to maintain adequate financing sources, our profitability and
financial condition will suffer and jeopardize our ability to
continue operations.
|
|
|
|
Recent developments in the residential mortgage market may
continue to adversely affect our revenues, profitability, and
financial condition.
|
|
|
|
The profitability and financial condition of our operations are
dependent upon the operations of General Motors Corporation.
|
|
|
|
The worldwide financial services industry is highly competitive.
If we are unable to compete successfully or if there is
increased competition in the automotive financing, mortgage,
and/or
insurance markets, or generally in the markets for
securitizations or asset sales, our margins could be materially
adversely affected.
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Our automotive financing, mortgage, and insurance activities
give rise to market risk, representing the potential loss in the
fair value of assets or liabilities caused by movements in
market variables, such as interest rates, foreign-exchange
rates, and equity prices. We are primarily exposed to interest
rate risk arising from changes in interest rates related to
financing, investing, and cash management activities. More
specifically, we have entered into contracts to provide
financing, to retain mortgage servicing rights, and to retain
various assets related to securitization activities all of which
are exposed in varying degrees to changes in value due to
movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from the
mismatch between assets and the related liabilities used for
funding. We enter into various financial instruments, including
derivatives, to maintain the
69
desired level of exposure to the risk of interest rate
fluctuations. Refer to Note 7 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information.
We are exposed to foreign-currency risk arising from the
possibility that fluctuations in foreign-exchange rates will
affect future earnings or asset and liability values related to
our global operations. Our most significant foreign-currency
exposures relate to the Euro, Canadian dollar, British pound
sterling, Brazilian real, Mexican peso, and Australian dollar.
We are also exposed to equity price risk, primarily in our
Insurance operations, which invests in equity securities that
are subject to price risk influenced by capital market
movements. Our equity securities are considered investments, and
we do not enter into derivatives to modify the risks associated
with our Insurance operations investment portfolio.
While the diversity of activities from our complementary lines
of business may partially mitigate market risk, we also actively
manage this risk. We maintain risk management control systems to
monitor interest rate, foreign-currency exchange rate, equity
price risks, and any of their related hedge positions. Positions
are monitored using a variety of analytical techniques including
market value, sensitivity analysis, and value at risk models.
Since December 31, 2007, there have been no material
changes in these market risks. Refer to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for further
discussion on value at risk and sensitivity analysis.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the
specified time periods. As of the end of the period covered by
this report, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer evaluated, with the participation of our management, the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on our evaluation, GMACs Chief Executive and Chief
Financial Officers each concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2008.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our most recent fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that
our disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent or
detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within GMAC have
been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities
that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management
override of the controls. The design of any system of controls
is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood
of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree
of compliance with associated policies or procedures. Because of
the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
70
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are subject to potential liability under laws and government
regulations and various claims and legal actions that are
pending or may be asserted against us. Please refer to the Legal
Proceedings section in our 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for additional information regarding pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Other than with respect to the risk factors provided below,
there have been no material changes to the Risk Factors
described in our 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Risks
Related to Our Business
ResCap has significant near-term liquidity issues and
short-term debt maturities. There is a significant risk that
ResCap will not be able to meet its debt service obligations in
the near term.
ResCap is highly leveraged relative to its cash flow with a
declining liquidity portfolio. As of March 31, 2008,
ResCaps liquidity portfolio (cash readily available to
cover operating demands from across its business operations and
maturing obligations) totaled $1.3 billion. In addition,
ResCap has expended a significant amount of its available cash
in recent weeks. ResCap has approximately $4.3 billion of
long-term unsecured debt maturing during the remainder of 2008,
consisting of approximately $1.2 billion aggregate
principal amount of notes due in June 2008, approximately
$1.8 billion of outstanding borrowings under its term loan
due in July 2008, and approximately $1.1 billion aggregate
principal amount of notes due in November 2008. Additionally,
ResCap had approximately $12.8 billion of secured,
short-term debt outstanding as of March 31, 2008 with
various maturity dates in 2008, excluding debt of GMAC Bank.
Between April 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008,
ResCap has $28.8 billion, or 98%, of its secured committed
capacity maturing. In the first quarter of 2008, the combination
of reduced credit commitments and lower effective advance rates
resulted in a substantial reduction of secured liquidity.
In ResCaps efforts to address its near-term liquidity
situation and capital structure, and to generally reduce its
financial risk, ResCap has undertaken a plan, which includes:
the debt tender and exchange offers previously announced; a
proposed $3.5 billion secured credit facility between GMAC
and ResCap; amendments to substantially all of its secured
bilateral facilities unrelated to GMAC Bank that would extend
the maturities of such facilities and eliminate or modify the
tangible net worth covenant contained in such facilities; the
contribution to ResCap by GMAC of approximately
$350.0 million principal amount of outstanding ResCap notes
held by GMAC in exchange for additional ResCap preferred units;
and approximately $150.0 million in additional borrowings
under existing secured facilities between GMAC and ResCap, the
availability of which is subject to ResCap meeting certain
conditions. Even if ResCap is successful in implementing all of
the actions described above, satisfying its liquidity needs and
complying with any anticipated covenants to be included in
ResCaps new debt agreements requiring maintenance of
minimum cash balances may require ResCap to consummate in the
near term certain asset sales or other capital generating
actions over and above ResCaps normal mortgage finance
activities to provide additional cash of approximately
$600 million by June 30, 2008. This additional cash
required is solely an estimate based upon internal monthly cash
forecasts targeting sufficient cash surpluses to prudently
operate ResCaps business and remain in excess of its
anticipated cash covenants.
If any of the components of ResCaps plan are unsuccessful
and its liquidity position does not otherwise improve, there is
a material risk that ResCap will be unable to meet certain of
its obligations as they come due, and meet certain financial
covenants in its credit facilities, and ResCap will be in a
negative liquidity position in June 2008.
Moreover, even if ResCap is successful in implementing all of
the actions described above, ResCaps ability to satisfy
its liquidity needs and comply with any covenants included in
its debt agreements requiring maintenance of minimum cash
balances may be affected by additional factors and events (such
as interest rate
71
fluctuations and margin calls) that increase ResCaps cash
needs making it unable to independently satisfy its near-term
liquidity requirements.
Our business requires substantial capital, and if we are
unable to maintain adequate financing sources, our profitability
and financial condition will suffer and jeopardize our ability
to continue operations.
Our liquidity and ongoing profitability are, in large part,
dependent upon our timely access to capital and the costs
associated with raising funds in different segments of the
capital markets. We depend and will continue to depend on our
ability to access diversified funding alternatives to meet
future cash flow requirements and to continue to fund our
operations. Negative credit events specific to us or our 49%
owner, GM, or other events affecting the overall debt markets
have adversely impacted our funding sources, and continued or
additional negative events could further adversely impact our
funding sources, especially over the long term. As an example,
an insolvency event for GM would curtail our ability to utilize
certain of our automotive wholesale loan securitization
structures as a source of funding in the future.
ResCaps liquidity has been significantly impaired, and may
be further impaired, due to circumstances beyond our control,
such as adverse changes in the economy and general market
conditions. Continued deterioration in ResCaps business
performance could limit, and recent reductions in ResCaps
credit ratings have limited, ResCaps ability to access the
capital markets on favorable terms. During recent volatile times
in the capital and secondary markets, especially since August
2007, access to aggregation and other forms of financing, as
well as access to securitization and secondary markets for the
sale of ResCaps loans, has been severely constricted.
Furthermore, ResCaps access to capital has been impacted
by changes in the market value of its mortgage products and the
willingness of market participants to provide liquidity for such
products.
ResCaps liquidity may also be adversely affected by margin
calls under certain of its secured credit facilities that are
dependent in part on the lenders valuation of the
collateral securing the financing. Each of these credit
facilities allows the lender, to varying degrees, to revalue the
collateral to values that the lender considers to reflect market
values. If a lender determines that the value of the collateral
has decreased, it may initiate a margin call requiring ResCap to
post additional collateral to cover the decrease. When ResCap is
subject to such a margin call, it must provide the lender with
additional collateral or repay a portion of the outstanding
borrowings with minimal notice. Any such margin call could harm
ResCaps liquidity, results of operation, financial
condition and business prospects. Additionally, in order to
obtain cash to satisfy a margin call, ResCap may be required to
liquidate assets at a disadvantageous time, which could cause it
to incur further losses and adversely affect its results of
operations and financial condition. Furthermore, continued
volatility in the capital markets has made determination of
collateral values uncertain compared to our historical
experience, and many of ResCaps lenders are taking a much
more conservative approach to valuations. As a result, the
frequency and magnitude of margin calls has increased, and we
expect both to remain high compared to historical experience for
the foreseeable future.
Recent developments in the market for many types of mortgage
products (including mortgage-backed securities) have resulted in
reduced liquidity for these assets. Although this reduction in
liquidity has been most acute with regard to nonprime assets,
there has been an overall reduction in liquidity across the
credit spectrum of mortgage products. As a result, ResCaps
liquidity has been and will continue to be negatively impacted
by margin calls and changes to advance rates on its secured
facilities. One consequence of this funding reduction is that
ResCap may decide to retain interests in securitized mortgage
pools that in other circumstances it would sell to investors,
and ResCap will have to secure additional financing for these
retained interests. If ResCap is unable to secure sufficient
financing for them, or if there is further general deterioration
of liquidity for mortgage products, it will adversely impact
ResCaps business. In addition, a number of ResCaps
financing facilities have relatively short terms, typically one
year or less, and a number of facilities are scheduled to mature
during 2008. Additionally, ResCap has $4.3 billion of
unsecured long-term debt maturing in 2008, which includes
$2.3 billion of senior unsecured notes. Though ResCap has
generally been able to renew maturing facilities when needed to
fund its operations, in recent months counterparties have often
negotiated more conservative terms. Such terms have included,
among other things, shorter maturities upon renewal, lower
overall borrowing limits, lower ratios of funding to collateral
value for secured facilities
72
and higher borrowing costs. Facilities that were extended were
generally for shorter terms than ResCap previously has
experienced. There can be no assurance that ResCap will be able
to renew other maturing credit facilities on favorable terms, or
at all.
Current conditions in the residential mortgage market and
housing markets may continue to adversely affect our earnings
and financial condition.
Recently, the residential mortgage market in the United States
and Europe has experienced a variety of difficulties and changed
economic conditions that adversely affected ResCaps
earnings and financial condition in 2007 and in 2008 to date.
Delinquencies and losses with respect to ResCaps nonprime
mortgage loans increased significantly and may continue to
increase. Housing prices in many parts of the United States and
the United Kingdom have also declined or stopped appreciating,
after extended periods of significant appreciation. In addition,
the liquidity provided to the mortgage sector has recently been
significantly reduced. This liquidity reduction combined with
ResCaps decision to reduce its exposure to the nonprime
mortgage market caused ResCaps nonprime mortgage
production to decline, and such declines may continue. Similar
trends are emerging beyond the nonprime sector, especially at
the lower end of the prime credit quality scale, and may have a
similar effect on ResCaps related liquidity needs and
businesses in the United States and Europe. These trends have
resulted in significant write-downs to ResCaps mortgage
loans held for sale and trading securities portfolios and
additions to its allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans
held for investment and warehouse lending receivables
portfolios. A continuation of these conditions, which we
anticipate in the near term, may continue to adversely affect
ResCaps financial condition and results of operations.
Moreover, the continued deterioration of the U.S. housing market
and decline in home prices in 2007 in many U.S. and
international markets, along with the expected continued decline
in 2008, are likely to result in increased delinquencies or
defaults on the mortgage assets ResCap owns and services.
Further, loans that were made based on limited credit or income
documentation also increase the likelihood of future increases
in delinquencies or defaults on mortgage loans. An increase in
delinquencies or defaults will result in a higher level of
credit losses and credit related expenses, which in turn will
reduce ResCaps revenues and profits. Higher credit losses
and credit-related expenses also could adversely affect
ResCaps financial condition.
ResCaps lending volume is generally related to the rate of
growth in U.S. residential mortgage debt outstanding and the
size of the U.S. residential mortgage market. Recently, the rate
of growth in total U.S. residential mortgage debt outstanding
has slowed sharply in response to the reduced activity in the
housing market and national declines in home prices. A decline
in the rate of growth in mortgage debt outstanding reduces the
number of mortgage loans available for ResCap to purchase or
securitize, which in turn could lead to a reduction in
ResCaps revenue, profits, and business prospects.
Given the recent disruptions and changes in the mortgage market,
ResCap faces the need to make significant changes in its
business processes and activities. At the same time, ResCap is
experiencing losses of staff resources at many levels, as a
result of both attrition and its previously announced
restructuring. The loss of staff beyond ResCaps control
increases the difficulty it faces in executing these adaptive
changes to its business, and those difficulties represent an
additional risk to ResCaps business and operating results.
Recent negative developments in ResCaps mortgage
markets have led ResCap to reduce the number of mortgage
products it offers.
As a result of decreased liquidity for a number of mortgage
products, including nonprime mortgage products and many products
offered through ResCaps international businesses, ResCap
no longer offers those products in the affected markets. In
ResCaps domestic mortgage business, it has shifted the
bulk of its loan production to prime mortgage products that
conform to the requirements of government-sponsored enterprises.
In ResCaps international business, it generally restricts
originations to those products and markets for which liquidity
remains available. The products that are currently relatively
liquid are generally not as profitable as the broader range of
products ResCap has traditionally offered. In addition, in the
U.S. and some other markets, a number of competitors offer
similar mortgage products, resulting in compression on interest
73
margins and gains on sales. As a result, ResCaps
operations will generally be less profitable than they would be
if it were able to offer a more diversified product line.
Certain of our owners are subject to a regulatory agreement
that may affect our control of GMAC Bank.
On February 1, 2008, Cerberus FIM, LLC, Cerberus FIM
Investors LLC and FIM Holdings LLC (collectively,
FIM Entities), submitted a letter to the FDIC
requesting that the FDIC waive certain of the requirements
contained in a two-year disposition agreement between each of
the FIM Entities and the FDIC. The agreement was entered into in
connection with the sale by General Motors of 51% of the equity
interests in GMAC to a consortium of investors led by Cerberus
FIM Entities and including wholly owned subsidiaries of
Citigroup Inc., Aozora Bank Ltd., and PNC Financial Services
Group, Inc. The sale resulted in a change of control of GMAC
Bank, an industrial loan corporation, which required the
approval of the FDIC. At the time of the sale, the FDIC had
imposed a moratorium on the approval of any applications for
deposit insurance or change of control notices. As a condition
to granting the application in connection with the change of
control of GMAC Bank during the moratorium, the FDIC required
each of the FIM Entities to enter into a two-year disposition
agreement. As previously disclosed by the FDIC, that agreement
requires, among other things, that by no later than
November 30, 2008, the FIM Entities complete one of
the following actions: (1) become registered with the
appropriate federal banking agency as a depository institution
holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act or the
Home Owners Loan Act, (2) divest control of GMAC Bank
to one or more persons or entities other than prohibited
transferees, (3) terminate GMAC Banks status as an
FDIC-insured depository institution, or (4) obtain from the
FDIC a waiver of the requirements set forth in this sentence on
the ground that applicable law and FDIC policy permit similarly
situated companies to acquire control of FDIC-insured industrial
banks, provided that no waiver request could be filed prior to
January 31, 2008 unless, prior to that date, Congress
enacted legislation permitting, or the FDIC by regulation or
order authorizes, similarly situated companies to acquire
control of FDIC-insured industrial banks after
January 31, 2007. We cannot give any assurance that
the FDIC will approve the FIM Entities waiver request, or,
if it is approved, that it will impose no conditions on our
retention of GMAC Bank or on its operations. However, it is
worth noting that the House of Representatives has passed a bill
that would permit the FIM Entities to continue to own GMAC Bank.
The Senate Banking Committee has approved a bill that would have
the same effect. If the FDIC does not approve the waiver we
could be required to sell GMAC Bank or cause it to cease to be
insured by the FDIC, or we could be subject to conditions on our
retention of GMAC Bank or on its operations in return for the
waiver. Requiring us to dispose of GMAC Bank or relinquish
deposit insurance would, and imposition of such conditions,
might materially adversely affect our access to low cost
liquidity and our business and operating results.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index of Exhibits are
filed as a part of this report. This Index is incorporated
herein by reference.
74
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, this
7th day of May 2008.
GMAC LLC
(Registrant)
Robert S. Hull
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
David J. DeBrunner
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and
Corporate Controller
75
EXHIBIT
INDEX
GMAC LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Description
|
|
Method of Filing
|
|
10.1
|
|
Feldstein Letter Agreement, dated March 20, 2008
|
|
Filed herewith
|
10.2
|
|
Khattri Letter Agreement, dated March 13, 2008
|
|
Filed herewith
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
The following exhibit shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. In
addition, Exhibit No. 32 shall not be deemed
incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
|
Filed herewith
|
76