sc13e3
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 13E-3
Rule 13E-3 Transaction Statement
Pursuant to Section 13(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
LEAR CORPORATION
(Name of the Issuer)
Lear Corporation
American Property Investors, Inc.
American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
American Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership
AREP Car Holdings Corp.
AREP Car Acquisition Corp.
Carl C. Icahn
Vincent J. Intrieri
(Names of Person(s) Filing Statement)
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Title of Class of Securities)
521865105
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
|
|
|
Lear Corporation
21557 Telegraph Road
Southfield, MI 48033
Attn: Daniel A. Ninivaggi
Executive Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel
(248) 447-1500
|
|
American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700
New York, New York 10153
Attn: Keith A. Meister
Principal Executive Officer and Vice
Chairman of the Board
(212) 702-4300 |
(Name, Address, and Telephone Numbers of Person Authorized to Receive Notices
and Communications on Behalf of the Persons Filing Statement)
With copies to:
|
|
|
Bruce A. Toth, Esq.
Winston & Strawn LLP
35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 558-5600
|
|
Steven L. Wasserman, Esq.
DLA Piper US LLP
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
(212) 335-4948 |
This statement is filed in connection with (check the appropriate box):
a. þ |
|
The filing of solicitation materials or an information statement
subject to Regulation 14A, Regulation 14C or Rule 13e-3(c) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
b. o |
|
The filing of a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
c. o |
|
A tender offer. |
|
d. o |
|
None of the above. |
Check the following box if the soliciting materials or information statement referred to in
checking box (a) are preliminary copies: þ
Check the following box if the filing is a final amendment reporting the results of the
transaction: o
Calculation of Filing Fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction valuation |
|
|
$2,858,944,606* |
|
|
Amount of filing fee |
|
|
$ |
87,770 |
** |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Calculated solely for the purpose of determining the filing fee. |
|
** |
|
The maximum aggregate value was determined based upon the sum
of (A) 76,642,783 shares of Common Stock multiplied by $36.00
per share; (B) options to purchase 720,575 shares of Common Stock with exercise prices less than $36.00 multiplied by $3.94
(which is the difference between $36.00 and the weighted average exercise price of $32.06 per share); (C) restricted stock
units with respect to 1,856,831 shares of Common Stock multiplied by $36.00 per share; (D) stock appreciation rights with
respect to 2,209,952 shares of Common Stock multiplied by $9.16 (which is the difference between $36.00 and the weighted
average exercise price of $26.84 per share); (E) deferred unit accounts with respect to 104,432 shares of Common Stock
multiplied by $36.00 per share; and (F) performance shares with respect to 169,909 shares of Common Stock multiplied by
$36.00 per share. In accordance with Section 14(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the filing fee was
determined by multiplying 0.0000307 by the sum calculated in the preceding sentence. |
|
þ |
|
Check the box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing with
which the offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or
Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
$ |
87,770 |
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
Lear Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form or Registration No.:
|
|
Schedule 14A
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
March 20, 2007 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
Item 1. Summary Term Sheet |
Item 2. Subject Company Information |
Item 3. Identity and Background of Filing Person |
Item 4. Terms of the Transaction |
Item 5. Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements |
Item 6. Purposes of the Transaction and Plans or Proposals |
Item 7. Purposes, Alternatives, Reasons and Effects |
Item 8. Fairness of the Transaction |
Item 9. Reports, Opinions, Appraisals and Negotiations |
Item 10. Source and Amounts of Funds or Other Consideration |
Item 11. Interest in Securities of the Subject Company |
Item 12. The Solicitation or Recommendation |
Item 13. Financial Information |
Item 14. Persons/Assets, Retained, Employed, Compensated or Used |
Item 15. Additional Information |
Item 16. Exhibits |
SIGNATURE |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS |
APPENDIX A Identity and Background of Filing Persons |
APPENDIX B Summary of Opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc., dated February 9, 2007 |
APPENDIX C Summary of Strategic Assessment Report, dated February 2, 2007, by A.T. Kearney Inc. |
Exhibit (b)(1) - Commitment Letter, dated February 8, 2007 |
Exhibit (c)(2) - Presentation, dated February 6, 2007, by J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. |
Exhibit (c)(3) - Strategic Assessment Report, dated February 2, 2007 by A.T. Kearney Inc. |
Exhibit (c)(4) - Opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc., dated February 9, 2007 |
INTRODUCTION
This Rule 13e-3 Transaction Statement (the Transaction Statement) is being filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) pursuant to Section 13(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), by Lear Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), AREP Car Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (Parent), AREP Car Acquisition Corp.,
a Delaware corporation (Merger Sub), American Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership, a
Delaware limited partnership (AREH), American Real Estate Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (AREP), American Property Investors, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Carl C. Icahn and
Vincent J. Intrieri (collectively, the Filing Persons).
This Transaction Statement relates to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February
9, 2007 (the Merger Agreement), by and among the Company, Parent and Merger Sub. If the Merger
Agreement is approved by the Companys stockholders and the other conditions to the closing of the
merger are either satisfied or waived, Merger Sub will be merged with
and into the Company (the Merger). The separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease, and the Company will
continue its corporate existence under Delaware law as the surviving corporation in the Merger.
The separate corporate existence of the Company with all of its rights, privileges, immunities,
powers and franchises, shall continue unaffected by the Merger. Upon consummation of the Merger,
each share of Company common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time
of the merger, other than shares owned by Parent, Merger Sub or any subsidiary of Parent or shares
held by holders who have properly demanded and perfected their appraisal rights, will be converted
into the right to receive $36.00 in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding
taxes.
Concurrently with the filing of this Transaction Statement, the Company is filing with the SEC
a preliminary proxy statement (the Proxy Statement) under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act in
connection with the Merger and the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company. The Proxy
Statement is attached hereto as Exhibit (a)(1). A copy of the Merger Agreement is attached to the
Proxy Statement as Appendix A and is incorporated herein by reference. As of the date hereof, the
Proxy Statement is in preliminary form and is subject to completion or amendment.
Pursuant to General Instruction F to Schedule 13E-3, the information in the Proxy Statement,
including all annexes, exhibits and appendices thereto, is expressly incorporated by reference
herein in its entirety, and responses to each item herein are qualified in their entirety by the
information contained in the Proxy Statement. The cross references below are being supplied
pursuant to General Instruction G to Schedule 13E-3 and show the location in the Proxy Statement of
the information required to be included in response to the items of Schedule 13E-3.
All information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Transaction Statement
concerning each Filing Person was supplied by such Filing Person, and no other Filing Person,
including the Company, takes responsibility for the accuracy of such information as it relates to
any other Filing Person.
The filing of this Transaction Statement shall not be construed as an admission by any of the
Filing Persons or by any affiliate of a Filing Person that any Filing Person is an affiliate of
the Company within the meaning of Rule 13e-3.
Item 1. Summary Term Sheet
The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following caption is incorporated
herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Item 2. Subject Company Information
(a) Name and Address. The Companys name and the address and telephone number of its principal
executive offices are as follows:
1
Lear Corporation
21557 Telegraph Road
Southfield, Michigan 48033
(248) 447-1500
(b) Securities. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions
is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary of Annual Meeting Outstanding Shares
(c) Trading Market and Price. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following caption is incorporated herein by reference:
Important Information Regarding LearMarket Price of Common Stock
(d) Dividends. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following caption is
incorporated herein by reference:
The Merger AgreementConduct of Business Prior to Closing
Important Information Regarding LearMarket Price of Common Stock
(e) Prior Public Offerings. Not applicable.
(f) Prior Stock Purchases. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following caption is incorporated herein by reference:
Important Information Regarding LearPrior Purchases and Sales of Lear Common Stock
Item 3. Identity and Background of Filing Person
(a) Name and Address. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
The Parties to the Merger
Important
Information Regarding Lear
The required information for this Item 3(a) for filing persons other than Lear is set forth
on Appendix A hereto.
(b) Business and Background of Entities. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement
under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
The Parties to the Merger
Important Information Regarding Lear
The required information for this Item 3(b) for filing persons other than Lear is set forth
on Appendix A hereto.
(c) Business and Background of Natural Persons. The information set forth in the Proxy
Statement under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
2
Summary Term Sheet
The Parties to the Merger
Directors and Beneficial Ownership
Important Information Regarding LearExecutive Officers of Lear
The required information for this Item 3(c) for filing persons other than Lear is set forth
in Appendix A hereto.
Item 4. Terms of the Transaction
(a) Material terms. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Summary of the Annual Meeting
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special
FactorsMr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsMaterial U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger to Our Stockholders
The Merger Agreement
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
(c) Different Terms. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special
FactorsCertain Effects of the Merger
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
The Merger AgreementTreatment of Options and Other Awards
(d) Appraisal Rights. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
3
Answers to Questions You May Have
Appraisal Rights
Appendix ESection 262
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(e) Provisions for Unaffiliated Security Holders. None.
(f) Eligibility for Listing or Trading. Not applicable.
Item 5. Past Contacts, Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements
(a) Transactions. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsLimited Guaranty
Special
FactorsInterests of the Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Special
FactorsVoting Agreement
The Merger Agreement
(b)-(c) Significant Corporate Events; Negotiations or Contacts. The information set forth in
the Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special
FactorsMr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
Special
FactorsLimited Guaranty
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Special
FactorsVoting Agreement
The Merger Agreement
4
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
(e) Agreements Involving the Subject Companys Securities. The information set forth in the
Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Special FactorsFinancing of the Merger
Special FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Special FactorsLimited Guaranty
Special FactorsVoting Agreement
The Merger Agreement
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
Item 6. Purposes of the Transaction and Plans or Proposals
(b) Use of Securities Acquired. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special FactorsMr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purposes and
Reasons for the Merger
Special FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
Special FactorsCertain Effects of the Merger
The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration
The Merger AgreementTreatment of Options and Other Awards
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
(c)(1)-(8) Plans. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
5
Special
FactorsMr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
Special
FactorsCertain Effects of the Merger
Special
Factors Financing of the Merger
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
The Merger Agreement
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
Item 7. Purposes, Alternatives, Reasons and Effects
(a) Purposes. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions is
incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special
FactorsMr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parents and Merger Subs as to
the Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
Special
FactorsCertain Effects of the Merger
(b) Alternatives. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special
Factors Mr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
6
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
(c) Reasons. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions is
incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special Factors Mr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
The
Strategic Assessment Report, dated February 2, 2007, by A. T. Kearney
Inc. for American Real Estate Partners, L.P. is attached hereto as Exhibit (c)(3) and is
incorporated herein by reference. The summary of this report is set
forth in Appendix C hereto.
(d) Effects. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions is
incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special Factors Mr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
Special FactorsCertain Effects of the Merger
Special FactorsFinancing of the Merger
Special FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Special FactorsMaterial U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger to Our Stockholders
The Merger Agreement
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
7
Item 8. Fairness of the Transaction
(a)(b) Fairness; Factors Considered in Determining Fairness. The information set forth in the
Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special
Factors Mr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsPlans for Lear after the Merger
Important Information Regarding Lear
Appendix BFairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
The presentation dated February 6, 2007, prepared by J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. for the
Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, is attached hereto as Exhibit (c)(2)
and is incorporated by reference herein.
(c) Approval of Security Holders. The transaction is not structured so that approval of at
least a majority of unaffiliated security holders is required.
The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated
herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Summary of the Annual MeetingRecord Date
Summary of the Annual MeetingQuorum
Summary of the Annual MeetingRequired Vote
The Merger AgreementConditions to the Merger
(d) Unaffiliated Representative. An unaffiliated representative was not retained to act solely
on behalf of unaffiliated security holders for purposes of negotiating the terms of the transaction
or preparing a report concerning the fairness of the transaction.
The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated
herein by reference:
8
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Special
Factors Mr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Appendix BFairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
(e) Approval of Directors. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
(f) Other Offers. Not applicable.
Item 9. Reports, Opinions, Appraisals and Negotiations
(a) (c) Report, Opinion or Appraisal; Preparer and Summary of the Report, Opinion or
Appraisal; Availability of Documents. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term SheetOpinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsOpinion of Financial Advisor to the Special Committee
Important Information Regarding Lear
9
Appendix BFairness Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
The presentation dated February 6, 2007, prepared by J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. for the
Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, is attached hereto as Exhibit (c)(2)
and is incorporated by reference herein.
The
Strategic Assessment Report, dated February 2, 2007, by A. T. Kearney
Inc. for American Real Estate Partners, L.P. is attached hereto as Exhibit (c)(3) and
incorporated herein by reference. The summary of this report is set forth in
Appendix C hereto.
The
opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc., dated February 9,
2007, is attached hereto as Exhibit (c)(4) and is incorporated
herein by reference. The summary of this opinion is set forth in
Appendix B hereto.
Item 10. Source and Amounts of Funds or Other Consideration
(a) - (d) Source of Funds; Conditions; Expenses; Borrowed Funds. The information set forth in
the Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Special
FactorsFinancing of the Merger
The Merger AgreementFinancing
The Merger AgreementFees and Expenses
The Merger AgreementTermination Fees and Expenses
The Merger AgreementConditions to the Merger
Appendix AThe Merger Agreement
Item 11. Interest in Securities of the Subject Company
(a) Securities Ownership. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following
captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Important Information Regarding LearSecurity Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
(b) Securities Transactions. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Special
FactorsVoting Agreement
Important Information Regarding LearSecurities Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
Important Information Regarding LearPrior Purchases and Sales of Lear Common Stock
Item 12. The Solicitation or Recommendation
(d) Intent to Tender or Vote in a Going-Private Transaction. The information set forth in the
Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
10
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
Factors Mr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Special
FactorsVoting Agreement
(e) Recommendation of Others. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Summary Term Sheet
Answers to Questions You May Have
Special
FactorsBackground of the Merger
Special
FactorsReasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Special Committee and Our Board of
Directors
Special
FactorsMr. Icahns, Mr. Intrieris, AREPs, Parents and Merger Subs Purpose and
Reasons for the Merger
Special
FactorsThe Position of Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP, Parent and Merger Sub as to the
Fairness of the Merger
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Item 13. Financial Information
(a) Financial Information. The audited financial statements set forth in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 are incorporated herein by reference.
The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the following captions is incorporated
herein by reference:
Important Information Regarding LearSelected Financial Data
Where You Can Find More Information
(b) Pro forma Information. Not applicable.
Item 14. Persons/Assets, Retained, Employed, Compensated or Used
(a) Solicitations or Recommendations. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under
the following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Answers to Questions You May HaveQuestions and Answers About the Annual Meeting
11
Summary of the Annual MeetingProxy Solicitation
(b) Employees and corporate assets. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the
following captions is incorporated herein by reference:
Special
FactorsPlans for Lear After the Merger
Special
FactorsInterests of Lears Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Item 15. Additional Information
(b) Other material information. The information set forth in the Proxy Statement, including
all appendices thereto, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 16. Exhibits
(a)(1) Preliminary Proxy Statement of Lear Corporation (incorporated by reference to the
Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 20, 2007).
(a)(2) Form of Proxy Card (incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy
Statement).
(a)(3) Letter to Stockholders (incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement).
(a)(4) Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders (incorporated herein by reference to the
Proxy Statement).
(b)(1)
Commitment Letter, dated February 8, 2007, by Bank of America, N.A. and Banc of America
Securities LLC.
(c)(1)
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., dated February 8, 2007 (incorporated herein by
reference to Appendix B of the Proxy Statement).
(c)(2) Presentation, dated February 6, 2007, by J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. for the Special
Committee of the Board of Directors of Lear Corporation.
(c)(3)
Strategic Assessment Report, dated February 2, 2007, by A. T. Kearney
Inc. for American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
(c)(4)
Opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc., dated February 9, 2007.
(d)(1) Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 9, 2007, among Lear Corporation, AREP Car
Holdings Corp. and AREP Car Acquisition Corp. (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of
the Proxy Statement).
(d)(2) Voting Agreement, dated February 9, 2007, by and among Lear Corporation, Icahn Partners
LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Koala Holding Limited Partnership and High River Limited
Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Appendix B of the Proxy Statement).
(d)(3) Guaranty of Payment, dated February 9, 2007, by American Real Estate Partners, L.P. in
favor of Lear Corporation (incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the Proxy Statement).
(d)(4) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2006, among the Lear Corporation,
Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP and Koala Holding LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Lears Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-11311), filed on October 17,
2006).
(f) Appendix E to the Proxy Statement (incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy
Statement).
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed
separately with the SEC pursuant to a confidential treatment request
under Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange Act. Omitted portions are indicated
in this exhibit with [*].
12
SIGNATURE
After due inquiry and to the best of each of the undersigneds knowledge and belief, each of
the undersigned certifies that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and
correct.
Dated as
of March 20, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEAR CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Daniel A. Ninivaggi
|
|
|
|
Name: Daniel A. Ninivaggi |
|
|
|
|
Title: Executive Vice President,
Secretary and General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
AREP CAR HOLDINGS CORP.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Hillel Moerman |
|
|
|
Name: Hillel Moerman |
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
AREP CAR ACQUISITION CORP.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Hillel Moerman |
|
|
|
Name: Hillel Moerman |
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
American Property Investors, Inc., its
General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Hillel Moerman
Name: Hillel Moerman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
American Property Investors, Inc., its
General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Hillel Moerman
Name: Hillel Moerman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMERICAN PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Hillel Moerman |
|
|
|
Name: Hillel Moerman |
|
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
CARL C. ICAHN
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Carl C. Icahn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VINCENT J. INTRIERI
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Vincent J. Intrieri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(a)(1) Preliminary Proxy Statement of Lear Corporation (incorporated by reference to the
Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 20, 2007).
(a)(2) Form of Proxy Card (incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy
Statement).
(a)(3) Letter to Stockholders (incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement).
(a)(4) Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders (incorporated herein by reference to the
Proxy Statement).
(b)(1) Commitment Letter, dated February 8, 2007, by Bank of America, N.A. and Banc of America
Securities LLC.
(c)(1) Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., dated February 8, 2007 (incorporated herein by
reference to Appendix B of the Proxy Statement).
(c)(2) Presentation, dated February 6, 2007, by J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. for the Special
Committee of the Board of Directors of Lear Corporation.
(c)(3)
Strategic Assessment Report, dated February 2, 2007, by A.T.
Kearney Inc. for American Real Estate Partners, L. P.
(c)(4)
Opinion of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc., dated February 9, 2007.
(d)(1) Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 9, 2007, among Lear Corporation, AREP Car
Holdings Corp. and AREP Car Acquisition Corp. (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of
the Proxy Statement).
(d)(2) Voting Agreement, dated February 9, 2007, by and among Lear Corporation, Icahn Partners
LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Koala Holding Limited Partnership and High River Limited
Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Appendix B of the Proxy Statement).
(d)(3) Guaranty of Payment, dated February 9, 2007, by American Real Estate Partners, L.P. in
favor of Lear Corporation (incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the Proxy Statement).
(d)(4) Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2006, among the Lear Corporation,
Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP and Koala Holding LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Lears Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 1-11311), filed on October 17,
2006).
(f) Appendix E to the Proxy Statement (incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy
Statement).
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed
separately with the SEC pursuant to a confidential treatment request
under Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange Act. Omitted portions are indicated
in this exhibit with [*].
14
APPENDIX A
Identity
and Background of Filing Persons Other than Lear
None of the persons named herein have been, during the last five years: (a) convicted in a
criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and similar violations or misdemeanors); or (b)
party to any judicial or administrative proceeding (except for matters that were dismissed without
sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining any filing
person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities
laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws.
Unless otherwise noted, each natural person named herein is a United States citizen. Unless
otherwise noted, each person named herein has a telephone number of (212) 702-4300 and a business
address of c/o American Real Estate Partners, L.P., 767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700, New York, New
York 10153.
Information Regarding American Property Investors, Inc.
American Property Investors, Inc., or API, is a corporation formed in Delaware on February
12, 1987 with principal offices at 767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700, New York, New York 10153. API is
wholly-owned, through an intermediate subsidiary, by Carl C. Icahn. APIs sole business is being
the general partner of American Real Estate Partners, L.P. and American Real Estate Holdings
Limited Partnership.
The name and material occupations, positions, offices or employment currently and during the
last five years of each executive officer and director of API is set forth below:
Carl C. Icahn, Chairman of the Board. Carl C. Icahns principal occupation is as an investor
and fund manager of his affiliated entities. Mr. Icahn has served as Chairman of the Board of API
since 1990. Mr. Icahn has served as chairman of the board and a director of Starfire Holding
Corporation, or Starfire, a privately-held holding company, and chairman of the board and a
director of various subsidiaries of Starfire, since 1984. Through his entities, CCI Onshore Corp.
and CCI Offshore Corp., Mr. Icahn manages private investment funds, including Icahn Partners LP and
Icahn Partners Master Fund LP. Since February 2005, Mr. Icahn has served as a director of CCI
Onshore Corp. and CCI Offshore Corp., which are in the business of managing private investment
funds, and, from September 2004 to February 2005, Mr. Icahn served as the sole member of their
predecessors, CCI Onshore LLC and CCI Offshore LLC, respectively. Mr. Icahn was also chairman of
the board and president of Icahn & Co., Inc., a registered broker-dealer and a member of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, from 1968 to 2005. Since 1994, Mr. Icahn has been the
principal beneficial stockholder of American Railcar, Inc., or American Railcar, a publicly traded
company that is primarily engaged in the business of manufacturing covered hopper and tank
railcars, and has served as chairman of the board and as a director of American Railcar since 1994.
From October 1998 through May 2004, Mr. Icahn was the president and a director of Stratosphere
Corporation, which operates the Stratosphere Casino Hotel & Tower. Mr. Icahn has been chairman of
the board and a director of XO Holdings, Inc. since February 2006 and was chairman of the board and
a director of XO Communications, Inc. (XO Holdings predecessor) from January 2003 to February
2006. XO Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded telecommunications services provider that is majority
owned by various entities controlled by Mr. Icahn. Mr. Icahn has served as a director of Cadus
Corporation, a publicly traded company engaged in the ownership and licensing of yeast-based drug
discovery technologies since July 1993. In May 2005, Mr. Icahn became a director of Blockbuster
Inc., a publicly traded provider of in-home movie rental and game entertainment. In September 2006,
Mr. Icahn became a director of ImClone Systems Incorporated, or Imclone Systems, a publicly traded
biopharmaceutical company, and since October 2006 has been the chairman of the board of ImClone
Systems. Mr. Icahn has been licensed by the Nevada State Gaming Control Commission.
William A. Leidesdorf, Director. William A. Leidesdorfs principal occupation is as owner and
managing director of Renaissance Housing, LLC. Mr. Leidesdorf has served as a director of API
since March 1991. Since December 2003, Mr. Leidesdorf has served as a director of American
Entertainment Properties Corp., or AEPC, the sole member of American Casino & Entertainment
Properties LLC, or ACEP. Since May 2005, Mr. Leidesdorf has served as a director of Atlantic Coast
Entertainment Holdings, Inc., or Atlantic Coast. Mr. Leidesdorf was director of Renco Steel Group,
Inc. and was a director of its subsidiary, WCI Steel, Inc., a steel producer which filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in September 2003. Since June 1997, Mr. Leidesdorf has been an
owner and a managing director of Renaissance Housing, LLC, a company primarily engaged in acquiring
multifamily residential
A-1
properties. From April 1995 through December 1997, Mr. Leidesdorf acted as an independent real
estate investment banker. Mr. Leidesdorf has been licensed by the Nevada State Gaming Control
Commission.
Vincent J. Intrieri, Director. Vincent J. Intrieris principal occupation is as Senior
Managing Director of Icahn Partners LP and Icahn Partners Master Fund LP. Mr. Intrieri has served
as a director of API since July 2006. Since February 2007, Mr. Intrieri has served as director and
President of AREP Car Holdings Corp. and AREP Car Acquisition Corp. Since December 2006, Mr. Intrieri has been a director of
National Energy Group, Inc., or NEGI. Since November 2004, Mr. Intrieri has been a Senior Managing
Director of Icahn Partners LP and Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, private investment funds
controlled by Mr. Icahn. Since January 1, 2005, Mr. Intrieri has been Senior Managing Director of
Icahn Associates Corp. and High River Limited Partnership. From March 2003 to December 2004, Mr.
Intrieri was a Managing Director of High River Limited Partnership and from 1998 to March 2003
served as portfolio manager for Icahn Associates Corp. Each of Icahn Associates Corp. and High
River Limited Partnership is owned and controlled by Mr. Icahn and is primarily engaged in the
business of holding and investing in securities. Since April 2005, Mr. Intrieri has been the
president and chief executive officer of Philip Services Corporation, a metal recycling and
industrial services company controlled by Mr. Icahn. Since August 2005, Mr. Intrieri has served as
a director of American Railcar. From March 2005 to December 2005, Mr. Intrieri was a Senior Vice
President, the Treasurer and the Secretary of American Railcar. Mr. Intrieri has served as a
director of XO Holdings since February 2006. Prior to that, he had served as a director of XO
Communications Inc. (XO Holdings predecessor) from January 2003 to February 2006. Since April
2003, Mr. Intrieri has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and a director of Viskase Companies,
Inc., a publicly traded producer of cellulose and plastic casings used in preparing and packaging
meat products that is majority owned by various entities controlled by Mr. Icahn. Since November
2006, Mr. Intrieri has been a director of Lear Corporation, a publicly traded supplier of
automotive interior systems and components, in which Mr. Icahn has an interest through the
ownership of securities and with which we have entered into an agreement and plan of merger. From
1995 to 1998, Mr. Intrieri served as portfolio manager for distressed investments with Elliott
Associates L.P., a New York investment fund. Prior to 1995, Mr. Intrieri was a partner at the
Arthur Andersen accounting firm. Mr. Intrieri is a certified public accountant.
James L. Nelson, Director. James L. Nelsons principal occupation is as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Eaglescliff Corporation. Mr. Nelson has served as a director of API since
June 2001. Since December 2003, Mr. Nelson has been a director of AEPC. Since May 2005, Mr. Nelson
has served as a director of Atlantic Coast. From 1986 until the present, Mr. Nelson has been
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Eaglescliff Corporation, a specialty investment banking,
consulting and wealth management company. From March 1998 through 2003, Mr. Nelson was Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Orbit Aviation, Inc., a company engaged in the acquisition and
completion of Boeing Business Jets for private and corporate clients. From August 1995 until July
1999, Mr. Nelson was Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chairman of Orbitex Management, Inc., a
financial services company in the mutual fund sector. From August 1995 until March 2001, he was on
the Board of Orbitex Financial Services Group. Mr. Nelson currently serves as a director and
Chairman of the Audit Committee of Viskase Companies, Inc. Mr. Nelson has been licensed by the
Nevada State Gaming Control Commission.
Jack G. Wasserman, Director. Jack G. Wassermans principal occupation is as an attorney.
Mr. Wasserman has served as a director of API since December 1993. Since December 2003, Mr.
Wasserman has been a director of AEPC. Since May 2005, Mr. Wasserman has served as a director of
Atlantic Coast. Mr. Wasserman is an attorney and a member of the Bars of New York, Florida and the
District of Columbia. From 1966 until 2001, he was a senior partner of Wasserman, Schneider, Babb &
Reed, a New York-based law firm, and its predecessors. Since September 2001, Mr. Wasserman has been
engaged in the practice of law as a sole practitioner. Mr. Wasserman has been licensed by the
Nevada State Gaming Control Commission and is an independent member and Chairman of the compliance
committee for all AREPs casinos. Since December 1998, Mr. Wasserman has been a director of NEGI.
Mr. Wasserman is also a director of Cadus Corporation, a biotechnology company. Affiliates of Mr.
Icahn are controlling shareholders of Cadus. Since March 2004, Mr. Wasserman has been a director of
Triarc Companies, Inc., a publicly traded diversified holding company. Mr. Wasserman serves on the
audit and compensation committees of Triarc.
Keith A. Meister, Principal Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board. Keith A.
Meisters principal occupation is as Principal Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of
API. Mr. Meister has served as Principal Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of API
since March 2006. He served as Chief Executive Officer of API from August 2003 until March 2006 and
as President of API from August 2003 until April 2005. Mr. Meister also serves as a director of
various direct and indirect subsidiaries of AREP. Mr. Meister is also a
A-2
Managing Director of Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP and Icahn Partners Master
Fund II LP, which are private investment funds controlled by Mr. Icahn. From March 2000 through
2001, Mr. Meister served as co-president of J Net Ventures, a venture capital fund that he
co-founded, focused on investments in information technology and enterprise software businesses.
From 1997 through 1999, Mr. Meister served as an investment professional at Northstar Capital
Partners, an opportunistic real estate investment partnership. Prior to Northstar, Mr. Meister
served as an investment analyst in the investment banking group at Lazard Freres. He also serves on
the Boards of Directors of the following companies: XO Holdings, American Railcar, and BKF Capital
Group, Inc., an investment management firm in which Mr. Icahn is a stockholder.
Peter K. Shea, President. Peter K. Sheas principal occupation is as Head of Portfolio
Company Operations at AREH. Mr. Shea has served as President of API since December 2006. Since
December 2006, Mr. Shea, has been Head of Portfolio Company Operations at AREH. Since December 27,
2006, Mr. Shea has also served as a director of XO Holdings. Since December 2006, Mr. Shea has
served as a director of American Railcar. Since December 20, 2006, Mr. Shea has served as a
director of WPI. Since November 2006, Mr. Shea has been a director of Viskase Companies, Inc. Mr.
Shea was an independent consultant to various companies and an advisor to private equity firms from
2002 until December 2006. During this period he also served as Executive Chairman of Roncadin GmbH,
a European food company, and a Board Director with Sabert Corporation, a manufacturer of plastics
and packaging products. From 1997 to 2001, he was a Managing Director of H.J. Heinz Company in
Europe, a manufacturer and marketer of a broad line of food products across the globe. Mr. Shea has
been Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or President of other companies including SMG Corporation,
John Morrell & Company and Polymer United. SMG and John Morrell were international meat processing
firms and Polymer United was a leading plastics manufacturer operating throughout Central America.
Previously, he held various executive positions, including Head of Global Corporate Development,
with United Brands Company, a Fortune 100 Company with a broad portfolio of companies operating in
many sectors. Mr. Shea began his career with General Foods Corporation. He has also served on the
Boards of Premium Standard Farms and New Energy Company of Indiana.
Hillel Moerman, Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Hillel Moermans
primary occupation is Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer of API. Mr. Moerman has
served as Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer for API since June 2006 and July
2006, respectively. Since February 2007, Mr. Moerman has served as Chief Financial Officer of AREP Car Holdings Corp. and AREP Car Acquisition Corp. From January 2005 until June 2006, Mr. Moerman, held the positions of Director
of Accounting and VP of Strategic Planning for API. Prior to that time, from September 2000 through
December 2004, Mr. Moerman was a Senior Manager with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Moerman also worked as
a staff accountant for the corporate finance group of the Securities and Exchange Commission from
1999 to 2000.
Information Regarding American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
American Real Estate Partners, L.P., or AREP, is a master limited partnership formed in
Delaware on February 17, 1987 with principal offices at 767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700, New York, New
York 10153. AREP is a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses including
Gaming, Real Estate and Home Fashion. AREPs primary business strategy is to continue to grow and
enhance the value of its businesses. AREP may also seek to acquire additional businesses that are
distressed or in out-of-favor industries and will consider divestiture of businesses. In addition,
AREP invests its available liquidity in debt and equity securities with a view towards enhancing
returns as it continues to assess further acquisitions of operating businesses.
AREPs general partner is API. AREP owns its businesses and conducts its investment activities
through a subsidiary limited partnership, American Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership, or
AREH, and its subsidiaries.
Information on the general partner of AREP is set forth in Information Regarding American
Property Investors, Inc. above.
Information Regarding American Real Estate Holdings Limited Partnership
AREH is a limited partnership formed in Delaware on February 17, 1987 with principal offices
at 445 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 1210, White Plains, NY 10601. AREH is a diversified holding company
engaged in a variety of businesses including Gaming, Real Estate and Home Fashion. AREHs primary
business strategy is to
A-3
continue to grow and enhance the value of its businesses. AREH may also seek to acquire additional
businesses that are distressed or in out-of-favor industries and will consider divestiture of
businesses from which it does not foresee adequate future cash flow or appreciation potential. In
addition, AREH invests its available liquidity in debt and equity securities with a view towards
enhancing returns as it continues to assess further acquisitions of operating businesses.
AREHs sole limited partner is AREP, which owns a 99% limited partnership interest in AREH.
AREHs general partner is API, which is also the general partner of AREP.
Information on the general partner of AREH is set forth in Information Regarding American
Property Investors, Inc. above.
Information Regarding AREP Car Holdings Corp.
AREP Car Holdings Corp., or Parent, is a Delaware corporation formed on February 1, 2007 with
principal offices at 767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700, New York, New York 10153. Parent is a wholly
owned subsidiary of AREH and was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the planned
acquisition of Lear and other related transactions.
The name and material occupations, positions, offices or employment currently and during the
last five years of each executive officer and director of Parent is set forth below:
Vincent J. Intrieri, Director and President. Refer to Information Regarding American
Property Investors, Inc. above.
Felicia
Buebel, Secretary. Felicia P. Buebels primary occupation is senior vice president and counsel to API,
AREH and AREP. Ms. Buebel has been the secretary of AREP Car Holdings Corp. and AREP Car
Acquisition Corp. since February 2007. Since August 2006, she has served as the assistant secretary of API. Ms. Buebel
has been employed as senior vice president and counsel to API, AREH and AREP since December 2000.
Hillel Moerman, Chief Financial Officer. Refer to Information Regarding American Property
Investors, Inc. above.
Andrew
Skobe, Vice President, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary. Andrew Skobes primary occupation is Treasurer of API. Mr. Skobe has served as Treasurer
of API since August 2006. From January 2006 until August 2006, Mr. Skobe held the position of
Treasury Director for API. Prior to that time, from 2002, Mr. Skobe was Vice President and Treasurer
for the Columbia House Company. From 2001 to 2002, he was a Financial Consultant for Parsons Consulting and
before that, he was CFO and Director of Raging Knowledge. Mr. Skobe has also held senior financial positions
at the Dun & Bradstreet Corporation, Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc., General Motors, and Manufacturers Hanover.
Information Regarding AREP Car Acquisition Corp.
AREP
Car Acquisition Corp., or Merger Sub, is a Delaware corporation formed on February 1, 2007
with principal offices at 767 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4700, New
York, New York 10153. Merger Sub is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Parent and was formed solely for the purpose of engaging in the planned
acquisition of Lear and other related transactions.
The name and material occupations, positions, offices or employment currently and during the
last five years of each executive officer and director of Merger Sub is set forth below:
Vincent J. Intrieri, Director and President. Refer to Information Regarding American
Property Investors, Inc. above.
Felicia Buebel, Secretary. Refer to Information Regarding AREP Car Holdings Corp. above.
Hillel Moerman, Chief Financial Officer. Refer to Information Regarding American Property
Investors, Inc. above.
Andrew Skobe, Vice President, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary. Refer to
Information Regarding AREP Car Holdings Corp. above.
A-4
APPENDIX B
Opinion
of Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc
In connection with the review and analysis of the merger by Mr. Icahn, Mr. Intrieri, AREP,
Parent and Merger Sub, the audit committee and the special committee of the board of directors (the
API Committees) of API engaged Morgan Joseph & Co. Inc. (Morgan Joseph) to advise the API
Committees and to furnish a written opinion as to the fairness to AREP, from a financial point of
view, of the consideration to be paid by AREP in the merger.
Morgan Joseph was engaged to provide an opinion as to the fairness to AREP, from a financial point
of view, of the consideration to be paid by AREP in the merger, including to comply with provisions
of indentures governing AREP indebtedness.
Approximately 90% of the outstanding
depositary units of AREP (MLP Units) are owned by affiliates of Mr. Icahn and, therefore, AREP is
deemed to be an affiliate of Mr. Icahn. API is wholly owned by affiliates of Mr. Icahn.
The API Committees selected Morgan Joseph as their financial advisor because Morgan Joseph has
substantial experience in transactions similar to the merger. Morgan Joseph regularly engages in
the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged
buyouts, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities and
private placements.
At
a meeting of the API Committees on February 9, 2007, Morgan Joseph furnished to the
API Committees its opinion (the Morgan Joseph Opinion) that, as of such date, and based upon the
assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of its review set forth therein, the
consideration to be paid by AREP in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to AREP.
The description of the Morgan Joseph Opinion set forth in this section is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of the Morgan Joseph Opinion. You are urged to read the
Morgan Joseph Opinion in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions
made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the Morgan Joseph Opinion and the
review and analyses undertaken by Morgan Joseph in furnishing to the API Committees the Morgan
Joseph Opinion. The Morgan Joseph Opinion is filed as
Exhibit (c)(4) hereto.
The Morgan Joseph Opinion is addressed and was furnished solely to the API Committees and
addresses only the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid by
AREP in the merger. It does not address the merits of the underlying business decision by AREP,
the API Committees or any of AREPs affiliates or constituents to propose, consider, approve,
recommend, declare advisable or consummate the merger, and does not constitute a recommendation to
AREP, the API Committees, AREPs full board of directors, the holders of MLP units, or any other
AREP constituent, person or entity as to any specific action that should be taken (or not be taken)
in connection with the merger or as to any strategic or financial alternatives to the merger or as
to the timing of any of the foregoing.
In connection with furnishing the Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan Joseph reviewed and analyzed,
among other things, the following:
|
|
|
the February 6, 2007 draft of the merger agreement (which at such date Morgan Joseph
assumed was, with respect to all material terms and conditions thereof, substantially
in the form of the definitive agreement executed and delivered by the parties thereto); |
|
|
|
|
the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Lear with the SEC for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed by Lear with the SEC for
its fiscal quarters ended April 1, 2006, July 1, 2006, September 30, 2006, and
certain other filings made by Lear with the SEC under the Exchange Act; |
B-1
|
|
|
the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by AREP with the SEC for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed by AREP with the SEC for
its fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006, and
certain other Exchange Act filings made by AREP with the SEC; |
|
|
|
|
certain other publicly available business and financial information concerning Lear
and AREP, respectively, and the industries in which they operate, which Morgan Joseph
believed to be relevant; |
|
|
|
|
certain internal information and other data relating to Lear and AREP, respectively,
and their respective business and prospects, including budgets, projections and certain
presentations prepared by Lear and AREP, respectively, which were provided to Morgan
Joseph by AREPs senior management; |
|
|
|
|
the reported sales prices and trading activity of Lears common stock; |
|
|
|
|
certain publicly available information concerning certain other companies which
Morgan Joseph believed to be relevant and the trading markets for certain of such other
companies securities; |
|
|
|
|
the financial terms of certain recent unrelated transactions which Morgan Joseph
believed to be relevant; and |
|
|
|
|
the resolutions of the board of directors of API, dated February 2, 2007,
establishing and appointing the membership of the special committee of the board of
directors of API and prescribing its authority and mandate with respect to the proposed
merger, a complete and correct copy of which were provided to Morgan Joseph by AREPs
senior management. |
Morgan Joseph also participated in various conferences with certain officers, directors
(including the members of the API Committees), employees and outside consultants of AREP and its
affiliates concerning the business, operations, assets, financial condition and prospects of AREP
and Lear, respectively, and undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as Morgan
Joseph deemed relevant to the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
In performing its analyses, numerous assumptions were made with respect to industry
performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of Morgan Joseph, Mr. Icahn, API, AREP, Parent, Merger Sub and Lear.
Any estimates contained in the analyses performed by Morgan Joseph are not necessarily indicative
of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those
suggested by such analyses. Additionally, estimates of the value of businesses or securities do
not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which those businesses or securities might
actually be sold. Accordingly, the analyses and estimates are inherently subject to substantial
uncertainty.
In preparing the Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan Joseph assumed and relied upon the accuracy and
completeness of all financial and other publicly available information and data used by it and did
not attempt independently to verify such information, nor did Morgan Joseph assume any
responsibility or liability to do so. Morgan Joseph also assumed and relied upon the assurances of
senior management of AREP and its affiliates that no relevant information had been omitted or
remained undisclosed to Morgan Joseph, and Morgan Joseph did not attempt independently to verify
any such information, nor did Morgan Joseph assume any responsibility or liability to do so.
Morgan Joseph assumed that the forecasts and projections of Lear, which were provided by AREPs
senior management and reviewed by Morgan Joseph, had been reasonably prepared based on the best
current estimates, information and judgment of AREPs and Lears senior management, respectively,
as to the future financial condition, cash flows and results of operations of AREP and Lear and
their consolidated subsidiaries, respectively. Morgan Joseph neither made an investigation of any
such forecasts or projections or the assumptions on which they are based, nor did it assume any
responsibility to do so. Morgan Joseph further assumed that the transfer of substantially all of
the assets of Lears North American interior business segment to IAC North America will be
completed and that the merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms and subject to the
conditions contained in the merger agreement, without any economic or material further amendments
thereto or modification thereof, and without any waiver by AREP or Lear of any of the conditions to
their respective obligations thereunder.
B-2
Morgan Joseph made no independent investigation of any legal, accounting or tax matters
affecting Lear, AREP or any of their respective affiliates, or the merger, and Morgan Joseph
assumed the accuracy and completeness of all legal, accounting and tax advice provided to AREP and
the API Committees by AREPs management and the API Committees independent professional advisors.
Morgan Joseph did not conduct a physical inspection of any of the properties, assets or facilities
of Lear or AREP, nor did it make or obtain any independent valuation or appraisal of such
properties, assets or facilities. Morgan Joseph also took into account its assessment of general
economic, market and financial conditions and its experience in transactions that, in whole or in
part, it deemed to be relevant for purposes of its analyses, as well as its experience in
securities valuation in general.
The Morgan Joseph Opinion necessarily is based upon economic, market, financial and other
conditions as they existed on February 9, 2007 and does not address the fairness of the
consideration to be paid by AREP to holders of Lears common stock in the proposed merger on any
other date. Morgan Joseph expressed no opinion as to the price at which the depositary units of
AREP or any other securities will trade at any future time.
In connection with furnishing to the API Committees the Morgan Joseph Opinion, Morgan Joseph
performed a variety of financial analyses, which are summarized below. These analyses were
presented to the API Committees at a meeting held on February 9, 2007. The summary set
forth below does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Morgan
Joseph in this regard. The preparation of an opinion regarding financial fairness involves various
determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analyses and the
application of these methods to the particular circumstances, and, therefore, such an opinion is
not readily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Accordingly, notwithstanding
the separate analyses summarized below, Morgan Joseph believes that its analyses must be considered
as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors considered by it, without
considering all of its analyses and factors, or attempting to ascribe relative weights to some or
all of its analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the evaluation process
underlying the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
The financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data of Lear and AREP, which were
furnished to Morgan Joseph and used by it in some of its analyses, were prepared by the management
of Lear and AREP, respectively. Morgan Joseph was advised by the API Committees that neither Lear
nor AREP publicly discloses financial forecasts or forward-looking financial data of the type
provided to Morgan Joseph in connection with its review of the proposed merger, and, as a result,
these financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data were not prepared by Lear and AREP,
respectively, with a view towards public disclosure or in accordance with any AICPA or other
prescribed accounting guidelines or published best practices for public company financial forecasts
or projections. Morgan Joseph was specifically informed by management of Lear and AREP,
respectively, that these financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data were based on
numerous variables and assumptions developed and applied in good faith by management of Lear and
AREP, respectively. These variables and assumptions are inherently uncertain, including, without
limitation, factors related to general market, industry, economic and competitive conditions.
Accordingly, Morgan Joseph was informed that actual results could vary significantly from those set
forth in such financial forecasts and forward-looking financial data.
No company or transaction used in the analyses described below is identical to AREP, Lear or
the proposed merger. Accordingly, an analysis of the results thereof necessarily involves complex
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics and
other factors that could affect the proposed merger or the public trading or other values of AREP,
Lear or companies to which they are being compared. Mathematical analysis (such as determining an
average or median) is not in itself a meaningful method of using selected acquisition or company
data. In addition, in performing such analyses, Morgan Joseph relied, without any independent
verification, on projections prepared by research analysts at established securities firms, any of
which may or may not prove to be accurate.
The following is a summary of the material analyses performed by Morgan Joseph in connection
with the Morgan Joseph Opinion.
B-3
Selected Comparable Transactions Analysis
Using publicly available information, Morgan Joseph reviewed the purchase prices and multiples
paid in the following selected merger and acquisition transactions involving companies in the
automotive interior systems supplier industries in which it deemed relevant in reviewing the
financial terms of the proposed merger (the Selected Transactions), presented below in
Acquiror/Target format (with parenthetical reverse chronological date of announcement):
|
|
|
Robert Bosch/Pacifica Group Ltd. (October 18, 2006); |
|
|
|
|
Asahi Tec Corp./Metaldyne Corp. (September 1, 2006); |
|
|
|
|
EQT Partners/ MTU Friedrichshafen GmbH (December 28, 2005); |
|
|
|
|
BorgWarner Germany/Beru AG (November 1, 2004); |
|
|
|
|
Magna International, Inc./Tesma International Inc. (October 25, 2004); |
|
|
|
|
Cypress Group, Goldman Sachs/Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (September 9, 2004); |
|
|
|
|
Cypress Group/Dana Corp. (automotive parts division) (July 9, 2004); |
|
|
|
|
Cypress Group/Affina Group Inc. (July 9, 2004); |
|
|
|
|
Carlyle Group/United Components Inc. (May 1, 2003); |
|
|
|
|
Blackstone Group/TRW Inc. (automotive parts division) (November 17, 2002); |
|
|
|
|
Timkin Co./The Torrington Company (October 16, 2002); |
|
|
|
|
Collins & Aikman Corp./Textron Autotive Trim (August 7, 2001); and |
|
|
|
|
Heartland Industrial Partners/Collins & Aikman Corp. (January 12, 2001). |
Morgan Joseph applied a methodology similar to the one it used in its selected publicly traded
companies analysis described below, but relied on multiples derived from merger and acquisition
transactions involving target companies in industries similar, although not identical, based on
their participation in one or more product segments in which Lear competes. These product segments
include, but are not limited to, automotive interior seating, electrical distribution systems and
select electronic and other products.
Morgan Joseph considered all of the Selected Transactions (which ranged in transaction value
from $4.725 billion to $452.8 million) as a group and did not view any single transaction to be
more relevant than the others. The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph included the
purchase prices and multiples paid by the acquiring company of the acquired companys financial
results over the twelve-month period preceding the acquisition (LTM). The table below summarizes
the results of this analysis:
Multiples Observed from the Selected Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25th Percentile |
|
50th Percentile |
|
75th Percentile |
Multiple of Transaction Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/LTM Sales |
|
|
0.6x |
|
|
|
0.7x |
|
|
|
0.7x |
|
/LTM EBITDA (1) |
|
|
5.1x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
6.8x |
|
/LTM EBIT(2) |
|
|
8.3x |
|
|
|
10.1x |
|
|
|
10.6x |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
EBITDA means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. |
|
(2) |
|
EBIT means earnings before interest and taxes. |
Based on this analysis, Morgan Joseph derived a valuation range of 5.1x to 6.8x Lears 2006
adjusted EBITDA of $856.0 million to arrive at an implied share price range for Lear of $28.71 to
$47.80, yielding a median implied share price of $38.50. The merger consideration is within this
range of implied share prices. The implied share price range set forth above assumed adjustments
to EBITDA to eliminate the results of Lears North American interior business segment, which is
pending divestiture, and to eliminate certain charges considered to be of a non-recurring nature
including goodwill and fixed asset impairment and restructuring charges (the EBITDA Adjustments).
Lear has classified such business segment in Note 2 to Lears consolidated financial statements
included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as
constituting assets and liabilities held for sale. The range of EBITDA multiples applied by
Morgan Joseph reflect the 25th percentile, at the low end, and the 75th
percentile, at the high end, of the range of the Selected Transactions.
B-4
Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis.
Using publicly available information, Morgan Joseph reviewed the stock prices (at February 2,
2007) and selected market trading multiples of the following companies (the Selected Companies):
|
|
|
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
Dana Corp.; |
|
|
|
|
Faurecia SA; |
|
|
|
|
Johnson Controls Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
Magna International, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.; |
|
|
|
|
Valeo SA; and |
|
|
|
|
Visteon Corp. |
The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph included market trading multiples
exhibited by the Selected Companies with respect to their LTM, their 2006 estimated financial
performance and their 2007 estimated financial performance. The table below provides a summary of
these comparisons:
Multiples Observed from the Selected Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25th Percentile |
|
50th Percentile |
|
75th Percentile |
Multiple of Enterprise Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/LTM EBITDA |
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
4.9x |
|
|
|
5.7x |
|
/2006 Estimated EBITDA |
|
|
4.7x |
|
|
|
5.5x |
|
|
|
6.2x |
|
/2007 Estimated EBITDA |
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
4.7x |
|
|
|
4.9x |
|
The multiples shown in the table above exclude Johnson Controls from the averages. Johnson
Controls is a direct competitor of Lear in the automotive seating business. However, approximately
43% of Johnson Controls revenues in fiscal 2006 and approximately 66% of operating income,
excluding restructuring costs, were derived from businesses other than Johnson Controls automotive
interior systems and products. As a result, Morgan Joseph believed that Johnson Controls multiples
were not indicative of comparable public companies in the automotive parts industry.
The financial information reviewed by Morgan Joseph also included market trading multiples
exhibited by Lear with respect to its LTM, its 2006 estimated financial performance and its 2007
estimated financial performance, as set forth in the table below:
Multiples
for Lear
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple of Enterprise Value: |
|
|
|
|
/LTM EBITDA |
|
|
6.8x |
|
/2006 Estimated EBITDA |
|
|
6.8x |
|
/2007 Estimated EBITDA |
|
|
5.4x |
|
Based on this analysis, Morgan Joseph derived a valuation range of 4.5x to 6.2x Lears 2006
adjusted EBITDA of $856.0 million to arrive at an implied share price range for Lear of $22.16 to
$40.79, yielding a median implied share price of $30.45. The merger consideration is within this
range of implied share prices. The implied share price range set forth above took into account the
EBITDA Adjustments. The range of EBITDA multiples applied by Morgan Joseph reflect the
25th percentile, at the low end, and the 75th percentile, at the high end, of
the range of the Selected Companies.
Because of the inherent differences in the business operations, financial condition and
prospects of Lear, and the business operations and financial condition of the Selected Companies,
Morgan Joseph did not rely solely on the quantitative results of the selected publicly traded
companies analysis. Morgan Joseph also made non-mathematical, qualitative and subjective judgments
concerning differences between the characteristics of the comparable companies and Lear which, in
its judgment, could affect the values of such companies. The non-mathematical qualitative and
subjective judgments made by Morgan Joseph included an evaluation of the different stages of
maturity and the industry cycle of each Selected Company.
B-5
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Morgan Joseph selected the range of discount rates used for this analysis by calculating
Lears implied weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Lears WACC was calculated by using
various assumptions, including, but not limited to, an assumed cost of equity of 14.4% to 18.1%, an
assumed pre-tax cost of debt of 8.5%, and an assumed marginal tax rate of 38%. The WACC
calculation resulted in an approximate 11% discount rate for Lear which was used as a midpoint for
the 10%-12% discount rate range.
Morgan Joseph performed a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the present value of the
stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Lear was projected to generate over the
calendar years 2006 through 2010, based on internal estimates provided by Lears and AREPs
managements. Unlevered free cash flow represents the amount of cash generated and available for
principal, interest and dividend payments after providing for the funding of Lears ongoing
business operations. These cash flows were discounted to a present value using discount rates
ranging from 10.0% to 12.0%. To calculate the implied enterprise value range for Lear, the
discounted cash flows were added to a range of estimated terminal (end date) values, which was
calculated by using the EBITDA Exit Multiple Methodology.
This method calculates the terminal value by applying multiples ranging from 4.5x to 5.5x,
based on EBITDA multiples paid as per the comparable transactions analysis, to the projected 2010
EBITDA of Lear. The implied terminal values were then discounted to present value using 10.0% to
12.0% discount rates. The present values of the implied terminal values of Lear were then added to
the present value of the after-tax free cash flows to arrive at a range of enterprise values. The
table below provides a summary of the range of enterprise values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value |
|
|
Free Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flow as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
4.5x |
|
5.0x |
|
5.5x |
WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
$ |
1,958.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,323.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,697.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,070.8 |
|
11.0% |
|
$ |
1,914.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,159.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,520.3 |
|
|
$ |
5,880.8 |
|
12.0% |
|
$ |
1,872.6 |
|
|
$ |
5,003.2 |
|
|
$ |
5,351.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,698.8 |
|
This analysis indicated an implied equity value per share range for Lear. The table below
provides a summary of the range of implied equity value per share range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Value per Share(1) |
|
|
Net Debt and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
4.5x |
|
5.0x |
|
5.5x |
WACC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0% |
|
$ |
2,061.0 |
|
|
$ |
41.31 |
|
|
$ |
46.04 |
|
|
$ |
50.78 |
|
11.0% |
|
$ |
2,061.0 |
|
|
$ |
39.24 |
|
|
$ |
43.80 |
|
|
$ |
48.37 |
|
12.0% |
|
$ |
2,061.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.26 |
|
|
$ |
41.66 |
|
|
$ |
46.07 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on 79.0 million fully diluted shares outstanding February 2, 2007. |
Although the Discounted Cash Flow analysis produced values higher than the consideration to be
paid by AREP in the merger, Morgan Joseph believes that the analyses described in the Morgan Joseph
Opinion must be considered as a whole and not on an individual basis, and that to consider it
otherwise than as an entirety could potentially present an inaccurate or misleading description of
such analyses.
B-6
Premiums Paid Analysis
Morgan Joseph reviewed the premiums paid for 317 selected publicly announced U.S. domestic
transactions announced between February 2, 2006 and February 2, 2007 having transaction values of
between $1.0 billion and $10.0 billion. Morgan Joseph then compared the average premiums of these
transactions based on per share market prices of the target company at reference points of one day
prior to transaction announcement, one week prior to transaction announcement and one month prior
to transaction announcement, respectively, to the implied premium based on the merger consideration
of approximately $36.00 per share in cash to Lears stock price at the same reference points as
well as to Lears average stock price over a one-month, three-month and twelve-month period. The
following table shows the average premiums of the above mentioned transactions and the implied
premium based on the merger consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Offer Premium to |
|
|
1 Day Prior |
|
1 Week Prior |
|
1 Month Prior |
Average Offer Premium |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
|
|
69.0 |
% |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
Lear Merger Offer Premium |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
AREP and Morgan Joseph entered into a letter agreement dated February 1, 2007 relating to the
services to be provided by Morgan Joseph in connection with the proposed merger. Pursuant to the
terms of such letter agreement, AREP paid $375,000 to Morgan Joseph upon execution of the
engagement letter and $375,000 on February 9, 2007 upon the delivery of the Morgan Joseph Opinion
to the API Committees. AREP also agreed to reimburse Morgan Joseph for its reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement, including certain fees and
disbursements of its legal counsel. Such fees and reimbursements were not contingent upon
consummation of the merger. Under a separate letter agreement, AREP agreed to indemnify Morgan
Joseph against liabilities relating to or arising out of its engagement, including liabilities
under the U.S. federal securities laws.
In the ordinary course of business during the past two years, Morgan Joseph (i) was engaged by
the API Committees to provide fairness opinions to the API Committees in January 2005 in connection
with certain acquisition transactions similar in nature to the proposed merger involving the
acquisition by AREP of certain companies in which affiliates of Mr. Icahn owned capital stock, for
which Morgan Joseph received aggregate fees of $1,000,000, and (ii) has been engaged by the API
Committees to provide fairness opinions to the API Committees in connection with (a) a potential
transaction involving the acquisition by AREP of certain debt instruments and the assumption of
certain rights and obligations under certain derivative securities of a certain publicly traded
company held by affiliates of Mr. Icahn, for which Morgan Joseph would receive fees of $750,000
upon delivery of its opinion to the API Committees and (b) an additional potential transaction
involving the acquisition by AREP of all of the capital stock owned by affiliates of Mr. Icahn of a
certain closely held company, for which Morgan Joseph has received a fee of $375,000 upon execution
of an engagement letter in connection therewith and would receive an additional fee of $375,000
upon delivery of its opinion to the API Committees.
In accordance with the letter agreement, Morgan Josephs opinion is addressed solely to the
API Committees, solely for their use in connection with their review and evaluation of the
consideration proposed to be paid by AREP in the merger. Neither the Morgan Joseph Opinion nor its
underlying financial analyses may be relied on by any person or entity other than the members of
the API Committees, in their capacity as such, without the prior written consent of Morgan Joseph.
In accordance with the letter agreement, no holders of MLP Units, or any other AREP constituent,
person or entity can rely or assert reliance on the Morgan Joseph Opinion or underlying financial
analyses in connection with any voting, credit extension, audit or other consideration or
assessment of the relative merits, risks or financial reporting requirements of the merger, or
otherwise. Morgan Josephs view is that its duties in connection with the Morgan Joseph Opinion
extend solely to the API Committees and that it has no legal responsibilities in respect thereof to
any other person or entity under the laws of the State of New York, the laws which govern the
engagement letter agreement between AREP and Morgan Joseph. Morgan Joseph states in the letter
agreement that it would likely assert the substance of this view and the disclaimer described above
as a defense to claims and allegations, if any, that might hypothetically be brought or asserted
against it by any persons or entities other than the API Committees with respect to the Morgan
Joseph Opinion and its financial analyses thereunder. Morgan Joseph also states, however, that
because no court has definitely ruled to date on the availability of this defense to a financial
advisor who furnished to its client for its exclusive use a fairness opinion, this issue
B-7
necessarily would have to be judicially resolved on the merits in a final and non-appealable
judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. The letter agreement provides that there can be no
assurance that such a court would apply the laws of the state of New York to the analyses and
ultimate resolution of this issue if it were to be properly briefed by the relevant litigants and
presented to the court. The letter agreement also provides that, in all cases, the hypothetical
assertion or availability of such a defense would have absolutely no effect on Morgan Josephs
rights and responsibilities under U.S. federal securities laws, or the rights and responsibilities
of the API Committees under applicable state law or under U.S. federal securities laws.
B-8
APPENDIX C
A.T. Kearney Report
In connection with its review and analysis of the proposed merger of Merger Sub with and into
Lear, American Real Estate Partners, L.P. engaged A.T. Kearney, Inc. to conduct a business diligence review of Lear and to provide
a strategic assessment of Lear, its competitors and the automotive industry generally.
This report is referred to as the A.T.
Kearney Report. A.T. Kearney is an affiliate of an international management consulting firm with
experience providing business strategy, operations, and organization planning and consulting
services. AREP instructed A.T. Kearney to conduct a strategic assessment of Lear, including an
analysis of Lears revenue plan, restructuring plan, competitive position and prospects within the
seating and electronic and electrical markets. A.T. Kearney did not review or analyze transactions
comparable to the merger, provide advice or recommendations with respect to the consideration to be
offered in connection with the merger or evaluate the fairness of the proposed merger to the
stockholders of Lear.
A.T. Kearney regularly engages in business diligence reviews and strategic assessments similar
to that conducted for AREP. AREP selected A.T. Kearney to perform the business diligence review
and strategic assessment based on A.T. Kearneys knowledge, experience, and reputation in
conducting such reviews and assessments, in general, and its understanding of the automotive parts
industry in particular. A.T. Kearney has had no material relationship with AREP during the past
two years and A.T. Kearney received customary fees in connection with the preparation and delivery
of the A.T. Kearney Report.
On February 2, 2007, A.T. Kearney presented the A.T. Kearney Report to AREP. The A.T. Kearney
Report is attached to this document as Exhibit (c)(3).
The following is a summary of the material analyses and conclusions contained in the
A.T. Kearney Report. Please refer to Exhibit (c)(3) for a further description of the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the
A.T. Kearney Report and the review and analyses undertaken by A.T. Kearney in furnishing to AREP
the A.T. Kearney Report.
The A.T. Kearney Report is addressed and was furnished to AREP. It does not address
the merits of the underlying business decision by AREP or any of AREPs affiliates or constituents
to propose, consider, approve, recommend, declare advisable or consummate the merger, and does not
constitute a recommendation to the stockholders of Lear, AREP, the holders of AREPs depositary
units, or any other AREP or Lear constituent, person or entity as to any specific action that
should be taken (or not be taken) in connection with the merger or as to any strategic or financial
alternatives to the merger or as to the timing of any of the foregoing.
The A.T. Kearney Report was prepared and delivered not for purposes of assessing the fairness
to AREP or Lear stockholders of the merger or the consideration to
C-1
be paid in connection with the merger, but as part of a general business strategy consulting
assignment intended to educate AREP with respect to the industry in which Lear operates and Lears
competitive position within that industry. The A.T. Kearney Report was not intended as a valuation
of the fair market price per share in connection with the merger and it does not address the merits
or fairness of the merger or the merger consideration.
Project Methodology
In connection with furnishing the A.T. Kearney Report, A.T. Kearney reviewed and analyzed,
among other things, publicly available information and reports on the automotive industry and the
automotive Tier I market generally and the seating and electrical and electronics markets
specifically; information provided by members of Lears management team; onsite interviews of Lear
executives; and publicly available information on Lear and Lears major customers and competitors.
A.T. Kearney assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all publicly available
information and data used by it and did not attempt to independently verify such information, nor
did A.T. Kearney assume any responsibility or liability to do so. A.T. Kearney also assumed and
relied upon the information and projections provided to it by AREP and Lear and that no relevant
information had been omitted. A.T. Kearney did not attempt to independently verify any such
information, nor did it assume any responsibility to do so.
Throughout the course of its engagement, A.T. Kearneys representatives were in contact with
AREP in order to respond to specific instructions about the scope of its due diligence.
Summary of Findings
A.T. Kearney identified the following as strengths with respect to Lear and its business:
|
|
|
The seating market shows growth potential because seats are increasing in
content and are increasingly used for vehicle differentiation; |
|
|
|
|
Lear operates in a seat market with consolidated competition and rational
pricing; |
|
|
|
|
Lear has strong people, operations and systems; |
|
|
|
|
Lear is favorably viewed in the industry and is trusted by most auto makers to
deliver major programs; and |
|
|
|
|
Lears business has a strong balance of market presence in North America and
Europe with a growing Asian presence. |
C-2
|
|
|
A.T. Kearney identified the following concerns with respect to Lear and its businesses: |
|
|
|
|
Generic risks associated with the North American based automotive Tier I
market, including declining sales from the traditional Big 3 auto makers; cost
pressures from auto makers and raw material pricing volatility; |
|
|
|
|
Lears ability to quickly transition sales and associated cost structure from
North America to Asia and Eastern Europe are impacted by a significant union
presence in Lear operations in North America and declining North American revenue
which will create excess capacity in that region; and |
|
|
|
|
A softening of Lears revenue pipeline in 2008 and 2009 with limited commercial
opportunities in that timeframe. |
A.T. Kearney concluded that Lear is a well-positioned major seat supplier with a much smaller,
sub-scale electrical and electronics business and made the following conclusions with respect to
Lear and its businesses:
|
|
|
In late 2006 and projected into 2007, Lear has improved operating income levels to
3.2% and has rebounded from a weak performance in 2005; |
|
|
|
|
Lear is executing a restructuring program for a total restructuring savings of
approximately $125.0 million annually with an investment of approximately $300.0
million over the 2005-2007 timeframe; |
|
|
|
|
Lear enjoys a strong relationship with its major customers and
has successfully executed new program launches; |
|
|
|
A review of 10 of Lears major programs representing in excess of $4 billion in
revenues indicated that all programs reviewed were positive contributors with
manageable risks; |
|
|
|
|
Lears program management system and culture provide strong financial control,
assumption tracking and execution management; |
|
|
|
|
Lear is implementing a metal strategy to increase vertical integration and expand
the metal and mechanism content, which requires it to increase competency in this
complex area; |
|
|
|
|
There is softness in the North American revenue pipeline in 2008 and 2009 that can
be offset by aggressive sales activity in the near-future and/or increased
restructuring and cost savings efforts; and |
|
|
|
|
The Electrical distribution business is 4th in the market place, while electronics
is a sub-scale niche player: |
|
|
|
While these businesses are stable performers, their smaller
size and differing competencies may require strategies different from that for the seating business. |
C-3