Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
Commission File Number: 001-34981
Fidelity Southern Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
58-1416811 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3490 Piedmont Road, Suite 1550, Atlanta GA
|
|
30305 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(404) 639-6500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a Smaller Reporting Company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Shares Outstanding at July 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Common Stock, no par value
|
|
13,006,682 |
FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
191,759 |
|
|
$ |
45,761 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
194,999 |
|
|
|
47,759 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of
$169,618 and $160,740 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively) |
|
|
171,683 |
|
|
|
161,478 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity (approximate fair
value of $11,393 and $14,926 at June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
10,570 |
|
|
|
14,110 |
|
Investment in FHLB stock |
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
Loans held-for-sale (loans at fair value: $47,503 at June 30,
2011; $155,029 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
98,333 |
|
|
|
209,898 |
|
Loans |
|
|
1,458,658 |
|
|
|
1,403,372 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(29,801 |
) |
|
|
(28,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,428,857 |
|
|
|
1,375,290 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
21,154 |
|
|
|
19,510 |
|
Other real estate, net |
|
|
21,026 |
|
|
|
20,525 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
7,704 |
|
|
|
7,990 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
30,878 |
|
|
|
30,275 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
52,676 |
|
|
|
51,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,044,336 |
|
|
$ |
1,945,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
214,980 |
|
|
$ |
185,614 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and money market |
|
|
421,458 |
|
|
|
427,590 |
|
Savings |
|
|
420,082 |
|
|
|
398,012 |
|
Time deposits, $100,000 and over |
|
|
302,463 |
|
|
|
246,317 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
349,421 |
|
|
|
355,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,708,404 |
|
|
|
1,613,248 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
35,951 |
|
|
|
32,977 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
67,527 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
17,430 |
|
|
|
13,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,884,498 |
|
|
|
1,804,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value. Authorized 10,000,000; 48,200
shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
46,020 |
|
|
|
45,578 |
|
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 50,000,000; issued
and outstanding 13,014,077 and 10,829,492 at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
72,217 |
|
|
|
57,542 |
|
Unrealized gain on investments, net of tax |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
40,321 |
|
|
|
36,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
159,838 |
|
|
|
140,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,044,336 |
|
|
$ |
1,945,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
43,044 |
|
|
$ |
42,818 |
|
|
$ |
21,153 |
|
|
$ |
21,754 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
3,402 |
|
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
Federal funds sold and bank deposits |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
46,536 |
|
|
|
47,672 |
|
|
|
23,091 |
|
|
|
24,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
13,225 |
|
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
6,349 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
12,319 |
|
|
|
16,867 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
34,217 |
|
|
|
30,805 |
|
|
|
17,045 |
|
|
|
16,241 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
23,592 |
|
|
|
25,680 |
|
|
|
12,195 |
|
|
|
15,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
1,972 |
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
Other fees and charges |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
11,443 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
5,484 |
|
|
|
4,525 |
|
Indirect lending activities |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
SBA lending activities |
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
Other |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
25,780 |
|
|
|
17,755 |
|
|
|
14,094 |
|
|
|
11,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
22,463 |
|
|
|
18,905 |
|
|
|
11,641 |
|
|
|
10,021 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
Net occupancy |
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Communication |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Professional and other services |
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
Cost of operation of other real estate |
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
FDIC insurance premiums |
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
4,054 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
41,358 |
|
|
|
35,817 |
|
|
|
20,883 |
|
|
|
18,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
8,014 |
|
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
7,516 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,558 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5,456 |
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
3,614 |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
3,810 |
|
|
$ |
3,418 |
|
|
$ |
2,791 |
|
|
$ |
4,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.32 |
|
|
$ |
.24 |
|
|
$ |
.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.29 |
|
|
$ |
.21 |
|
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic |
|
|
11,267,916 |
|
|
|
10,619,041 |
|
|
|
11,700,955 |
|
|
|
10,776,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-fully diluted |
|
|
12,798,015 |
|
|
|
11,895,606 |
|
|
|
13,190,787 |
|
|
|
12,258,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
5,064 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
Other amortization |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
Reserve for impairment of other real estate |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Proceeds from sales of loans |
|
|
716,932 |
|
|
|
442,345 |
|
Proceeds from sales of other real estate |
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
7,080 |
|
Loans originated for resale |
|
|
(588,959 |
) |
|
|
(489,222 |
) |
Gain on loan sales |
|
|
(16,408 |
) |
|
|
(5,564 |
) |
Gain on sales of investment securities |
|
|
(1,078 |
) |
|
|
(2,291 |
) |
Gain on sales of other real estate |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(386 |
) |
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
1,012 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
6,033 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,366 |
|
|
|
5,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
141,308 |
|
|
|
(22,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(83,769 |
) |
|
|
(196,547 |
) |
Purchases of investment in FHLB stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
32,781 |
|
|
|
100,633 |
|
Maturities and calls of investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
Maturities and calls of investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
42,654 |
|
|
|
72,638 |
|
Redemption of investment in FHLB stock |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(75,278 |
) |
|
|
(37,230 |
) |
Capital improvements to other real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(2,647 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(82,628 |
) |
|
|
(59,756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in transactional accounts |
|
|
45,304 |
|
|
|
94,569 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits |
|
|
49,852 |
|
|
|
(81,673 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings |
|
|
(19,526 |
) |
|
|
8,032 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
|
|
14,139 |
|
|
|
2,149 |
|
Preferred stock dividends paid |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
88,560 |
|
|
|
21,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
147,240 |
|
|
|
(59,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
47,759 |
|
|
|
171,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
194,999 |
|
|
$ |
111,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
12,606 |
|
|
$ |
17,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
6,455 |
|
|
$ |
(951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transfers to other real estate |
|
$ |
11,085 |
|
|
$ |
10,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion on U.S. Treasury preferred stock |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred from held-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,586 |
|
|
$ |
3,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
JUNE 30, 2011
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Fidelity
Southern Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries (Fidelity). Fidelity Southern Corporation
(FSC) owns 100% of Fidelity Bank (the Bank), and LionMark Insurance Company, an insurance
agency offering consumer credit related insurance products. FSC also owns five subsidiaries
established to issue trust preferred securities, which entities are not consolidated for financial
reporting purposes in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 942-810-55, as FSC
is not the primary beneficiary. The Company, as used herein, includes FSC and its subsidiaries,
unless the context otherwise requires.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles followed within the financial services industry for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete
financial statements.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the periods covered by the statements of income.
Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are
particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the
allowance for loan losses, the valuation of mortgage loans held-for-sale, the calculations of and
the amortization of capitalized servicing rights, the valuation of net deferred income taxes and
the valuation of real estate or other assets acquired in connection with foreclosures or in
satisfaction of loans. In addition, the actual lives of certain amortizable assets and income
items are estimates subject to change. The Company principally operates in one business segment,
which is community banking.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods have been included. All
such adjustments are normal recurring accruals. Certain previously reported amounts have been
reclassified to conform to current presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on
previously reported net income, or shareholders equity or cash flows. The Companys significant
accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There were no new accounting policies or changes to existing policies adopted in the first six
months of 2011, which had a significant effect on the results of operations or statement of
financial condition. For interim reporting purposes, the Company follows the same basic accounting
policies and considers each interim period as an integral part of an annual period.
Operating results for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2011. These statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December
31, 2010.
2. Shareholders Equity
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FRB) is the primary regulator of
FSC, a bank holding company. The Bank is a state chartered commercial bank subject to Federal and
state statutes applicable to banks chartered under the banking laws of the State of Georgia and to
banks whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC), the
Banks primary Federal regulator. The Bank is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The
Banks state regulator is the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the GDBF). The FDIC and
the GDBF examine and evaluate the financial condition, operations, and policies and procedures of
state chartered commercial banks, such as the Bank, as part of their legally prescribed oversight
responsibilities.
The FRB, FDIC, and GDBF have established capital adequacy requirements as a function of their
oversight of bank holding companies and state chartered banks. Each bank holding company and each
bank must maintain certain minimum capital ratios. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Company exceeded all capital ratios required by the FRB, FDIC, and GDBF to be considered well
capitalized.
In May 2011, the Company increased capital $14.4 million in a private placement of common
stock. The 2,167,166 shares were sold for $6.65 per share, with no investor purchasing shares
resulting in beneficial ownership of more than 9.9% of the Companys common stock.
6
Earnings per share were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,614 |
|
|
$ |
4,869 |
|
Less dividends on preferred stock and accretion of discount |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
2,791 |
|
|
$ |
4,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
11,643 |
|
|
|
10,511 |
|
Effect of stock dividends |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
11,701 |
|
|
|
10,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options and warrants |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding dilutive |
|
|
13,191 |
|
|
|
12,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
.24 |
|
|
$ |
.38 |
|
Earnings per share dilutive |
|
$ |
.21 |
|
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,456 |
|
|
$ |
5,064 |
|
Less dividends on preferred stock and accretion of discount |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common equity |
|
$ |
3,810 |
|
|
$ |
3,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
11,212 |
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
Effect of stock dividends |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
11,268 |
|
|
|
10,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive stock options and warrants |
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding dilutive |
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
11,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.32 |
|
Earnings per share dilutive |
|
$ |
.30 |
|
|
$ |
.29 |
|
Average number of shares for 2010 and 2011 includes participating securities related to
unvested restricted stock awards. There were 150,907 in common stock options with an average
exercise price of $18.37 at June 30, 2011, and 158,407 in options with an average price of $18.38
at June 30, 2010, which would have been included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share
except that to do so would have an anti-dilutive impact on earnings per share.
3. Contingencies
Due to the nature of their activities, the Company and its subsidiaries are at times engaged
in various legal proceedings that arise in the course of normal business, some of which were
outstanding as of June 30, 2011. While it is difficult to predict or determine the outcome of
these proceedings, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with its legal counsel, that
the ultimate liabilities, if any, will not have a material adverse impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
4. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and other comprehensive income (loss), related to
unrealized gains and losses on investment securities classified as available-for-sale. All other
comprehensive income (loss) items are tax effected at a rate of 38% for each period.
During the second quarter and first six months of 2011, other comprehensive income net of tax
was $1.1 million and $822,000, respectively. Other comprehensive income, net of tax, was $943,000
and $1.3 million for the comparable periods in 2010. Comprehensive income for the second quarter
and first six months of 2011 was $4.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively, compared to $5.8
million and $6.4 million for the same periods in 2010.
7
5. Share-Based Compensation
The Companys 1997 Stock Option Plan authorized the grant of options to management personnel
for up to 500,000 shares of the Companys common stock. All options granted have three year to
eight year terms and vest and become fully exercisable at the end of three years to five years of
continued employment. No options may be or were granted after June 30, 2007, under this plan.
The Fidelity Southern Corporation Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Incentive Plan), as
amended, permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other
incentive awards (Incentive Awards). Pursuant to an amendment to the Plan adopted by the
shareholders on April 26, 2011, the maximum number of shares of the Companys common stock that may
be issued under the 2006 Incentive Plan is 2,250,000 shares, all of which may be stock options.
Generally, no award shall be exercisable or become vested or payable more than 10 years after the
date of grant. Options granted under the 2006 Incentive Plan have four year terms and become fully
exercisable at the end of three years of continued employment. Incentive awards available under
the 2006 Incentive Plan totaled 212,227 shares at June 30, 2011.
In the first quarter of 2010, FSC granted 154,078 restricted shares of common stock under the
2006 Equity Incentive Plan to certain employees. The stock was granted at $4.50 per share, vests
40% after two years and then 20% per year through five years and will be fully vested after January
22, 2015. The restricted stock is subject to section 111 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008, as amended by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and regulations
issued by the Department of the Treasury. At June 30, 2011, there was $485,000 in remaining
unrecognized compensation cost related to the restricted stock.
A summary of option activity as of June 30, 2011, and changes during the six month period then
ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
share |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Terms |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
492,239 |
|
|
$ |
8.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
18.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
370,905 |
|
|
$ |
5.30 |
|
|
2.0 years |
|
|
$ |
590,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
254,572 |
|
|
$ |
5.62 |
|
|
2.0 years |
|
|
$ |
324,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense was not significant for the three month and six month periods
ended June 30, 2011.
6. Fair Value Election and Measurement
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, now codified in
FASB ASC 820-10-35, for financial assets and financial liabilities, which establishes a common
definition of fair value and framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP. Fair value is an
exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. FASB ASC 820-10-35 establishes a
fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair
value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC
820-10-35 are described below:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either
directly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3 Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the
fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).
A financial instruments level within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
8
In certain circumstances, fair value enables a company to more accurately align its financial
performance with the economic value of hedged assets. Fair value enables a company to mitigate the
non-economic earnings volatility caused from financial assets and financial liabilities being
carried at different bases of accounting, as well as to more accurately portray the active and
dynamic management of a companys balance sheet.
In accordance with SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities which is now codified in ASC 825-10-25, the Company has elected to record mortgage
loans held-for-sale at fair value. The following is a description of mortgage loans held-for-sale
as of June 30, 2011, including the specific reasons for electing fair value and the strategies for
managing these assets on a fair value basis.
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale
The Company records mortgage loans held-for-sale at fair value in order to eliminate the
complexities and inherent difficulties of achieving hedge accounting and to better align reported
results with the underlying economic changes in value of the loans and related hedge instruments.
This election impacts the timing and recognition of origination fees and costs, as well as
servicing value. Specifically, origination fees and costs, which had been appropriately deferred
under SFAS No. 91 Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or
Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases now codified in ASC 310-20-25 and previously
recognized as part of the gain/loss on sale of the loans, are now recognized in earnings at the
time of origination. Interest income on mortgage loans held-for-sale is recorded on an accrual
basis in the consolidated statement of income under the heading Interest income loans,
including fees. The servicing value is included in the fair value of the Interest Rate Lock
Commitments (IRLCs) with borrowers. The mark to market adjustments related to loans
held-for-sale and the associated economic hedges are captured in mortgage banking activities.
Valuation Methodologies and Fair Value Hierarchy
The primary financial instruments that the Company carries at fair value include investment
securities, IRLCs, derivative instruments, and loans held-for-sale. Classification in the fair
value hierarchy of financial instruments is based on the criteria set forth in SFAS No. 157, now
codified in FASB ASC 820-10-35.
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government corporations and agencies, debt securities issued by
states and political subdivisions, and agency residential mortgage backed securities classified as
available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the
Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value
measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows,
the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus
prepayment speeds, credit information and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things. The
investments in the Companys portfolio are generally not quoted on an exchange but are actively
traded in the secondary institutional markets.
The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale is based on what secondary markets are
currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics predominantly consisting of those
conforming to government sponsored entity or agency standards. The fair value measurements
consider observable data that may include market trade pricing from brokers and the mortgage-backed
security markets. As such, the Company classifies these loans as Level 2.
The Company classifies IRLCs on residential mortgage loans held-for-sale, which are
derivatives under SFAS No. 133 now codified in ASC 815-10-15, on a gross basis within other
liabilities or other assets. The fair value of these commitments, while based on interest rates
observable in the market, is highly dependent on the ultimate closing of the loans. These
pull-through rates are based on both the Companys historical data and the current interest rate
environment and reflect the Companys best estimate of the likelihood that a commitment will
ultimately result in a closed loan. As a result of the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
109 (SAB No. 109), the loan servicing value is also included in the fair value of IRLCs. Because
these inputs are not transparent in market trades, IRLCs are considered to be Level 3 assets.
Derivative instruments are primarily transacted in the secondary mortgage and
institutional dealer markets and priced with observable market assumptions at a mid-market
valuation point, with appropriate valuation adjustments for liquidity and credit risk. For
purposes of valuation adjustments to its derivative positions under FASB ASC 820-10-35, the Company
has evaluated liquidity premiums that may be demanded by market participants, as well as the credit
risk of its counterparties and its own credit if applicable. To date, no material losses due to a
counterpartys inability to pay any net uncollateralized position has been incurred.
The credit risk associated with the underlying cash flows of an instrument carried at fair
value was a consideration in estimating the fair value of certain financial instruments. Credit
risk was considered in the valuation through a variety of inputs, as applicable, including, the
actual default and loss severity of the collateral, and level of subordination. The assumptions
used to estimate credit risk applied relevant information that a market participant would likely
use in valuing an instrument. Because mortgage loans held-for-sale are sold within a few weeks of
origination, it is unlikely to demonstrate any of the credit weaknesses discussed above and as a
result, there were no credit related adjustments to fair value at June 30, 2011.
9
The following tables present financial assets measured at fair value at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, on a recurring basis and the change in fair value for those specific financial
instruments in which fair value has been elected at June 30, 2011 and 2010. The changes in the
fair value of economic hedges were also recorded in mortgage banking activities and are designed to
partially offset the change in fair value of the mortgage loans held-for-sale and interest rate
lock commitments referenced in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
36,276 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,276 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions |
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities Agency |
|
|
123,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
47,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets(1) |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
Other Liabilities(1) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount includes mortgage related interest rate lock commitments and derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk. Interest rate lock commitments were recorded on a gross basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at |
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
26,336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities Agency |
|
|
123,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
155,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets(1) |
|
|
6,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,627 |
|
Other Liabilities(1) |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount includes mortgage related interest rate lock commitments and derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk. Interest rate lock commitments were recorded on a gross basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to |
|
|
|
Election of the Fair Value Option: Fair Value Gain |
|
|
|
related to Mortgage Banking Activities for the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
186 |
|
|
$ |
3,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant to |
|
|
|
Election of the Fair Value Option: Fair Value Gain |
|
|
|
related to Mortgage Banking Activities for the Six |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
2,603 |
|
|
$ |
3,627 |
|
10
The tables below present a reconciliation of all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
|
Liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning Balance April 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
$ |
(224 |
) |
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Settlements and closed loans |
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Expirations |
|
|
(706 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance June 30, 2011 (3) |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes mortgage related interest rate lock commitments and derivative financial
instruments entered into to hedge interest rate risk. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts included in earnings are recorded in mortgage banking activities. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the amount included in earnings attributable to the changes in unrealized
gains/losses relating to IRLCs and derivatives still held at period end. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
|
Liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning Balance January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
(446 |
) |
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
3,565 |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
Settlements and closed loans |
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
|
178 |
|
Expirations |
|
|
(6,873 |
) |
|
|
492 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance June 30, 2011 (3) |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes mortgage related interest rate lock commitments and derivative financial instruments entered into to hedge interest rate risk. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts included in earnings are recorded in mortgage banking activities. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the amount included in earnings attributable to the changes in unrealized gains/losses relating to IRLCs and derivatives still held at period end. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
|
Liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning Balance April 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
Settlements and closed loans |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Expirations |
|
|
(806 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance June 30, 2010 (3) |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
|
$ |
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes mortgage related interest rate lock commitments and derivative financial instruments entered into to hedge interest rate risk. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts included in earnings are recorded in mortgage banking activities. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the amount included in earnings attributable to the changes in unrealized gains/losses relating to IRLCs and derivatives still held at period end. |
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Assets(1) |
|
|
Liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) included in earnings:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
Settlements and closed loans |
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
Expirations |
|
|
(2,406 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
Total gains (losses) included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance June 30, 2010 (3) |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
|
$ |
(2,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes mortgage related interest rate lock commitments and derivative financial instruments entered into to hedge interest rate risk. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts included in earnings are recorded in mortgage banking activities. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the amount included in earnings attributable to the changes in unrealized gains/losses relating to IRLCs and derivatives still held at period end. |
The following tables present the assets that are measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as reported on the consolidated
statements of financial position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Inputs Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
68,253 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
68,253 |
|
|
$ |
(9,227 |
) |
ORE |
|
|
21,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,026 |
|
|
|
(6,836 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
8,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,831 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
SBA servicing rights |
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Inputs Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
70,455 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,455 |
|
|
$ |
(7,011 |
) |
ORE |
|
|
18,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,383 |
|
|
|
(7,228 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
7,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,109 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
SBA servicing rights |
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Inputs Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
79,954 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,954 |
|
|
$ |
(6,218 |
) |
ORE |
|
|
20,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,525 |
|
|
|
(6,403 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
SBA servicing rights |
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
Impaired loans are evaluated and valued at the time the loan is identified as impaired, at the
lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing
these loans and is classified as a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Collateral may include
real estate or business assets, including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The value
of real estate collateral is determined based on an appraisal by qualified licensed appraisers
hired by the Company. If significant, the value of business equipment is based on an appraisal by
qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company otherwise, the equipments net book value on the
business financial statements is the basis for the value of business equipment. Inventory and
accounts receivable collateral are valued based on independent field examiner review or aging
reports. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on managements historical
knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and managements expertise
and knowledge of the client and clients business. Impaired loans are evaluated on at least a
quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Mortgage servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value when mortgage loans are sold
servicing retained. These assets are then amortized in proportion to and over the period of
estimated net servicing income. On a monthly basis these servicing assets are assessed for
impairment based on fair value. Management determines fair value by stratifying the servicing
portfolio into homogeneous subsets with unique behavior characteristics, converting those
characteristics into income and expense streams, adjusting those streams for prepayments, present
valuing the adjusted streams, and combining the present values into a total. If the cost basis of
any loan stratification tranche is higher than the present value of the tranche, an impairment is
recorded.
12
SBA servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value when loans are sold servicing
retained. These assets are then amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net
servicing income. On a monthly basis these servicing assets are assessed for impairment based on
fair value. Management determines fair value by stratifying the servicing portfolio into
homogeneous subsets with unique behavior characteristics, converting those characteristics into
income and expense streams, adjusting those streams for prepayments, present valuing the adjusted
streams, and combining the present values into a total. If the cost basis of any loan
stratification tranche is higher than the present value of the tranche, an impairment is recorded.
Foreclosed assets in Other Real Estate are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans
to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value
or fair value less estimated selling costs. Fair value is based upon independent market prices,
appraised values of the collateral or managements estimation of the value of the collateral. When
the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised
value, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value
is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired
below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the
foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on
managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and
managements expertise and knowledge of the client and clients business.
The following tables present the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate
unpaid principal balance of loans held-for-sale for which the fair value option has been elected as
of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The tables also include the difference between aggregate
fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans that are 90 days or more past due,
as well as loans in nonaccrual status.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Fair Value |
|
|
Principal Balance Under |
|
|
Fair Value Over |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
FVO June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Unpaid Principal |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
47,503 |
|
|
$ |
46,842 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
Past due loans of 90+ days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Unpaid |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Aggregate Fair Value |
|
|
Principal Balance Under |
|
|
Under Unpaid |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
FVO December 31, 2010 |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
155,029 |
|
|
$ |
156,971 |
|
|
$ |
(1,942 |
) |
Past due loans of 90+ days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, (SFAS No. 107) as
amended by FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments now codified in ASC 825-10-50 requires disclosure of fair value information
about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is
practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair
values are based on settlements using present value or other valuation techniques. Those
techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and
estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be
substantiated by comparison to independent markets, and, in many cases, could not be realized in
immediate settlement of the instrument. ASC 825-10-50 excludes certain financial instruments and
all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair
value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Financial Instruments (Assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
194,628 |
|
|
$ |
194,628 |
|
|
$ |
47,242 |
|
|
$ |
47,242 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
Investment securities available-for-sale |
|
|
171,683 |
|
|
|
171,683 |
|
|
|
161,478 |
|
|
|
161,478 |
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
10,570 |
|
|
|
11,393 |
|
|
|
14,110 |
|
|
|
14,926 |
|
Investment in FHLB stock |
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
|
|
6,542 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,527,190 |
|
|
|
1,408,725 |
|
|
|
1,585,188 |
|
|
|
1,469,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments (assets) |
|
|
1,910,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,793,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,700,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-financial instruments (assets) |
|
|
133,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,044,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,945,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments (Liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
|
$ |
214,980 |
|
|
$ |
214,980 |
|
|
$ |
185,614 |
|
|
$ |
185,614 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,493,424 |
|
|
|
1,500,523 |
|
|
|
1,427,634 |
|
|
|
1,433,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,708,404 |
|
|
|
1,715,503 |
|
|
|
1,613,248 |
|
|
|
1,619,172 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
35,951 |
|
|
|
36,377 |
|
|
|
32,977 |
|
|
|
32,977 |
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
65,045 |
|
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
63,279 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
52,204 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
75,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial instruments (liabilities) |
|
|
1,864,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,869,129 |
|
|
|
1,788,752 |
|
|
$ |
1,790,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-financial instruments (liabilities and shareholders equity) |
|
|
179,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,044,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,945,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, due from banks, and
Federal funds sold approximate the fair values of those assets. For investment securities, fair
value equals quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair
value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes.
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.
Loans are segregated by type. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting
scheduled cash flows through the remaining maturities using estimated market discount rates that
reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loans along with a market risk premium
and liquidity discount.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is estimated taking into consideration recent
external appraisals of the underlying collateral for loans that are collateral dependent. If
appraisals are not available or if the loan is not collateral dependent, estimated cash flows are
discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows.
Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are judgmentally determined using
available market information and specific borrower information.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturities, such as noninterest-bearing demand
deposits, savings, interest-bearing demand, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount
payable on demand. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual
cash flows based on the discounted rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining
maturities.
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for short-term debt generally
approximate those liabilities fair values with the exception of FHLB advances which are estimated
based on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturity.
The fair value of the Companys long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices
for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining
maturities.
For off-balance sheet instruments, fair values are based on rates currently charged to enter
into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the
counterparties credit standing for loan commitments and letters of credit. Fees related to these
instruments were immaterial at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the carrying amounts
represent a reasonable approximation of their fair values. Loan commitments, letters and lines of
credit, and similar obligations typically have variable interest rates and clauses that deny
funding if the customers credit quality deteriorates. Therefore, the fair values of these items
are not significant and are not included in the foregoing schedule.
This presentation excludes certain nonfinancial instruments. The disclosures also do not
include certain intangible assets, such as customer relationships, and deposit base intangibles.
Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of
the Company.
14
7. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company maintains a risk management program to manage interest rate risk and pricing risk
associated with its mortgage lending activities. The risk management program includes the use of
forward contracts and other derivatives that are recorded in the financial statements at fair value
and are used to offset changes in value of the mortgage inventory due to changes in market interest
rates. As a normal part of its operations, the Company enters into derivative contracts to
economically hedge risks associated with overall price risk related to IRLCs and mortgage loans
held-for-sale carried at fair value under ASC 825-10-25. Fair value changes occur as a result of
interest rate movements as well as changes in the value of the associated servicing. Derivative
instruments used include forward sale commitments and IRLCs. All derivatives are carried at fair
value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets or other liabilities. A gross gain of
$439,000 and a gross loss of $4.8 million for the first six months of 2011 associated with the
forward sales commitments and IRLCs, respectively, are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of
Income in mortgage banking activities.
The Companys risk management derivatives are based on underlying risks primarily related to
interest rates and forward sales commitments. Forwards are contracts for the delayed delivery or
net settlement of an underlying instrument, such as a mortgage loan, in which the seller agrees to
deliver on a specified future date, either a specified instrument at a specified price or yield or
the net cash equivalent of an underlying instrument. These hedges are used to preserve the
Companys position relative to future sales of loans to third parties in an effort to minimize the
volatility of the expected gain on sale from changes in interest rate and the associated pricing
changes.
Credit and Market Risk Associated with Derivatives
Derivatives expose the Company to credit risk. If the counterparty fails to perform, the
credit risk at that time would be equal to the net derivative asset position, if any, for that
counterparty. The Company minimizes the credit or repayment risk in derivative instruments by
entering into transactions with high quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically by the
Companys Risk Management area.
The Companys derivative positions as of June 30, 2011, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract or Notional |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward rate commitments |
|
$ |
134,673 |
|
Interest rate lock commitments |
|
|
92,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives contracts |
|
$ |
227,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
15
8. Investments
Investment securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in less than one year |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,131 |
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,039 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
21,035 |
|
|
|
21,145 |
|
|
|
16,135 |
|
|
|
16,297 |
|
|
Municipal securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
6,145 |
|
|
|
6,231 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
5,482 |
|
Due five years through ten years |
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
|
6,113 |
|
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities-agency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
106,283 |
|
|
|
108,022 |
|
|
|
118,958 |
|
|
|
119,962 |
|
Due five years through ten years |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
15,756 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
169,618 |
|
|
$ |
171,683 |
|
|
$ |
160,740 |
|
|
$ |
161,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities-agency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in less than one year |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
10,532 |
|
|
|
11,355 |
|
|
|
12,340 |
|
|
|
13,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,570 |
|
|
$ |
11,393 |
|
|
$ |
14,110 |
|
|
$ |
14,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank sold five securities available-for-sale totaling $32.8 million during the six month
period ended June 30, 2011. Proceeds received totaled $33.9 million for a gross gain of $1.1
million. The Bank sold 17 securities held-for-sale totaling $102.8 million during the six month
period ended June 30, 2010. Proceeds received totaled $105.1 million for a gross gain of $2.3
million. The Bank had three securities for a total of $33.3 million called during the six month
period ended June 30, 2011. Seven securities for a total of $60.0 million were called during the
six months ended June 30, 2010. There were no investments held in trading accounts during 2011 and
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Other than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S.
Government corporations
and agencies |
|
$ |
36,035 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,276 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
11,704 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,269 |
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities agency |
|
|
121,879 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
169,618 |
|
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
(507 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities agency |
|
$ |
10,570 |
|
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,570 |
|
|
$ |
823 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Other than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S.
Government
corporations and
agencies |
|
$ |
26,135 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,336 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
11,705 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities agency |
|
|
122,900 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160,740 |
|
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
$ |
(1,040 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage-backed
securities agency |
|
$ |
14,110 |
|
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects the gross unrealized losses and fair values of investment
securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
and temporarily impaired position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
12 Months or Less |
|
|
More Than 12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
6,969 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agency |
|
|
24,996 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,875 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agency |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
12 Months or Less |
|
|
More Than 12 Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government corporations and agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
9,491 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agency |
|
|
52,983 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,474 |
|
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agency |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If fair value of a debt security is less than its amortized cost basis at the balance sheet
date, management must determine if the security has an other than temporary impairment (OTTI).
If management does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of a security, an OTTI has
occurred. If managements intention is to sell the security, an OTTI has occurred. If it is more
likely than not that management will be required to sell a security before the recovery of the
amortized cost basis, an OTTI has occurred. The Company will recognize the full OTTI in earnings
if it intends to sell a security or will more likely than not be required to sell the security.
Otherwise, an OTTI will be separated into the amount representing a credit loss and the amount
related to all other factors. The amount of an OTTI related to credit losses will be recognized in
earnings. The amount related to other factors will be recognized in other comprehensive income,
net of taxes.
17
There was one municipal investment security in a continuous unrealized loss position for
37 months at June 30, 2011 and for 31 months at December 31, 2010. Although under pressure from
the recent recession, the unrealized loss position resulted not from credit quality issues, but
from market interest rate increases over the interest rates prevalent at the time the security was
purchased, and is considered temporary. In determining other-than-temporary impairment losses on
municipal securities, management primarily considers the credit rating of the municipality itself
as the primary source of repayment and secondarily the financial viability of the insurer of the
obligation.
9. Loans
Loans outstanding, by class, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
386,365 |
|
|
$ |
384,220 |
|
SBA loans |
|
|
83,172 |
|
|
|
94,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
469,537 |
|
|
|
478,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
102,377 |
|
|
|
115,224 |
|
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
773,859 |
|
|
|
695,754 |
|
Installment loans |
|
|
19,291 |
|
|
|
20,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
793,150 |
|
|
|
716,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
36,036 |
|
|
|
34,367 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
57,558 |
|
|
|
59,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans |
|
|
93,594 |
|
|
|
93,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
1,458,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,403,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
SBA loans |
|
$ |
20,830 |
|
|
$ |
24,869 |
|
Real estate mortgage residential |
|
|
47,503 |
|
|
|
155,029 |
|
Consumer installment loans |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
98,333 |
|
|
$ |
209,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans, segregated by class of loans, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
3,716 |
|
|
$ |
2,269 |
|
SBA loans |
|
|
14,648 |
|
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
|
16,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
45,889 |
|
|
|
54,117 |
|
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
Installment loans |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
3,833 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans |
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
69,654 |
|
|
$ |
76,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Approximately $61 million and $58 million in loan balances were past due 90 days or more
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
18
Loans delinquent 30-89 days and troubled debt restructured loans accruing interest,
segregated by class of loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Restructured |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Restructured |
|
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Delinquent |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
30-89 Days |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
10,913 |
|
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
$ |
3,152 |
|
SBA loans |
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
6,243 |
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
|
$ |
10,913 |
|
|
$ |
10,583 |
|
|
$ |
9,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no loans greater than 90 days delinquent and still accruing at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Loans and allowance for loan loss individually and collectively evaluated by portfolio segment
follow below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
7,569 |
|
|
$ |
11,314 |
|
|
$ |
7,241 |
|
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
29,694 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(3,661 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,013 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(3,608 |
) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,743 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
7,755 |
|
|
$ |
10,315 |
|
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,489 |
|
|
$ |
29,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
5,867 |
|
|
$ |
10,474 |
|
|
$ |
10,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
29,474 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,745 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(1,946 |
) |
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,520 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
6,029 |
|
|
$ |
9,599 |
|
|
$ |
9,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
27,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,286 |
|
|
$ |
7,598 |
|
|
$ |
2,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
28,082 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(6,162 |
) |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,440 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
(6,058 |
) |
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,906 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
7,087 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
7,755 |
|
|
$ |
10,315 |
|
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,489 |
|
|
$ |
29,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
5,468 |
|
|
$ |
11,436 |
|
|
$ |
10,772 |
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(4,331 |
) |
|
|
(3,895 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,575 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(4,223 |
) |
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,093 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
6,029 |
|
|
$ |
9,599 |
|
|
$ |
9,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
27,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
$ |
6,515 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,123 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,986 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
1,489 |
|
|
|
19,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
7,755 |
|
|
$ |
10,315 |
|
|
$ |
7,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
1,489 |
|
|
$ |
29,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
36,221 |
|
|
$ |
52,704 |
|
|
$ |
1,915 |
|
|
$ |
3,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,466 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
433,316 |
|
|
|
49,673 |
|
|
|
791,235 |
|
|
|
89,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,364,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
469,537 |
|
|
$ |
102,377 |
|
|
$ |
793,150 |
|
|
$ |
93,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,458,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
$ |
5,603 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
5,724 |
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
7,345 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
19,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
9,286 |
|
|
$ |
7,598 |
|
|
$ |
2,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
28,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
34,280 |
|
|
$ |
69,619 |
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
4,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109,073 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
444,222 |
|
|
|
45,605 |
|
|
|
715,701 |
|
|
|
88,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
478,502 |
|
|
$ |
115,224 |
|
|
$ |
716,185 |
|
|
$ |
93,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,403,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans are evaluated based on the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans original effective interest rate, or at the loans observable market
price, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Impaired loans
are specifically reviewed loans for which it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect
all amounts due according to the terms of the loan agreement. A specific valuation allowance is
required to the extent that the estimated value of an impaired loan is less than the recorded
investment. FASB ASC 310-10-35, formerly known as SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan, does not apply to large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous loans, such
as consumer installment loans, and which are collectively evaluated for impairment. Smaller
balance commercial loans are also excluded from the application of the statement. Interest on
impaired loans is reported on the cash basis as received when the full recovery of principal and
interest is anticipated, or after full principal and interest has been recovered when collection of
interest is in question.
Impaired loans, by class, are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost(1) |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost(1) |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Impaired Loans with Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
7,778 |
|
|
$ |
7,774 |
|
|
$ |
888 |
|
|
$ |
3,138 |
|
|
$ |
3,108 |
|
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
SBA loans |
|
|
6,255 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
4,441 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
57,360 |
|
|
|
42,605 |
|
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
68,670 |
|
|
|
50,077 |
|
|
|
5,603 |
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Installment loans |
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
1,436 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
76,595 |
|
|
$ |
60,286 |
|
|
$ |
9,986 |
|
|
$ |
80,457 |
|
|
$ |
61,719 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost(1) |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Cost(1) |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Impaired Loans with No Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
8,384 |
|
|
$ |
8,365 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,053 |
|
|
$ |
11,041 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
SBA loans |
|
|
17,653 |
|
|
|
15,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,102 |
|
|
|
15,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
13,799 |
|
|
|
10,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,790 |
|
|
|
19,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
40,229 |
|
|
$ |
34,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,055 |
|
|
$ |
47,354 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amortized cost reflects charge-offs that have been recognized plus other amounts that have been applied to reduce net book balance. |
Average impaired loans and interest income recognized, by class, are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
19,335 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
SBA loans |
|
|
19,433 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,443 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
54,396 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,727 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98,513 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
84,220 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Recognized on |
|
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
Impaired Loans |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
$ |
16,688 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,554 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
SBA loans |
|
|
19,385 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,358 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
60,129 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,473 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Installment loans |
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,286 |
|
|
$ |
856 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
86,156 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank uses an asset quality ratings system to assign a numeric indicator of the credit
quality and level of existing credit risk inherent in a loan. These ratings are adjusted
periodically as the Bank becomes aware of changes in the credit quality of the underlying loans.
The following are definitions of the asset ratings.
Rating #1 (High Quality) Loans rated 1 are of the highest quality. This category
includes loans that have been made to borrowers exhibiting strong profitability and stable trends
with a good track record. The borrowers balance sheet indicates a strong liquidity and capital
position. Industry outlook is good with the borrower performing as well as or better than the
industry. Little credit risk appears to exist.
Rating #2 (Good Quality) A 2 rated loan represents a good business risk with relatively
little credit risk apparent.
21
Rating #3 (Average Quality) A 3 rated loan represents an average business risk and credit
risk within normal credit standards.
Rating #4 (Acceptable Quality) A 4 rated loan represents acceptable business and credit
risks. However, the risk exceeds normal credit standards. Weaknesses exist and are considered
offset by other factors such as management, collateral or guarantors.
Rating #5 (Special Mention) A special mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve
managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or deterioration in the Banks credit
position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not
expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
Rating #6 (Substandard Assets) A Substandard Asset is inadequately protected by the current
sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so
classified will have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if
the deficiencies are not corrected.
Rating #7 (Doubtful Assets) Doubtful Assets have all the weaknesses inherent in one
classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly
questionable and improbable.
Rating #8 (Loss Assets) Loss Assets are considered uncollectable and of such little value
that their continuance as recorded assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that
the Loss Asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or
desirable to defer charging off this substantially worthless asset, even though partial recovery
may be realized in the future.
The table below shows the weighted average asset rating by class as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Asset |
|
|
|
Rating |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
3.83 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
SBA loans |
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
Installment loans |
|
|
3.59 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
3.11 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
The Bank uses FICO scoring to help evaluate the likelihood borrowers will pay their credit
obligations as agreed. The weighted-average FICO score for the indirect loan portfolio, included
in consumer installment loans, was 735 and 726 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
10. Certain Transfers of Financial Assets
The Company has transferred certain residential mortgage loans, SBA loans, and indirect loans
in which the Company has continuing involvement to third parties. The Company has not engaged in
securitization activities with respect to such loans. All such transfers have been accounted for
as sales by the Company. The Companys continuing involvement in such transfers has been limited
to certain servicing responsibilities. The Company is not required to provide additional financial
support to any of these entities, nor has the Company provided any support it was not obligated to
provide. Servicing rights may give rise to servicing assets, which are initially recognized at
fair value, subsequently amortized, and tested for impairment. Gains or losses upon sale, in
addition to servicing fees and collateral management fees, are recorded in noninterest income.
The majority of the indirect automobile loan pools and certain SBA and residential mortgage
loans are sold with servicing retained. When the contractually specific servicing fees on loans
sold servicing retained are expected to be more than adequate compensation to a servicer for
performing the servicing, a capitalized servicing asset is recognized based on fair value. When
the expected costs to a servicer for performing loan servicing are not expected to adequately
compensate a servicer, a capitalized servicing liability is recognized based on fair value. The
Company has no servicing liabilities. Servicing assets and servicing liabilities are amortized
over the expected lives of the serviced loans utilizing the interest method. Management makes
certain estimates and assumptions related to costs to service varying types of loans and pools of
loans, prepayment speeds, the projected lives of loans and pools of loans sold servicing retained,
and discount factors used in calculating the present values of servicing fees projected to be
received.
22
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total fair value of servicing for mortgage
loans was $9.5 million and $6.3 million, respectively. The fair value of servicing for SBA loans
at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, was $5.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively. To
estimate the fair values of these servicing assets, consideration was given to dealer indications
of market value, where applicable, as well as the results of discounted cash flow models using key
assumptions and inputs for prepayment rates, credit losses, and discount rates. Carrying value of
these servicing assets is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Mortgage servicing |
|
$ |
8,832 |
|
|
$ |
5,495 |
|
SBA servicing |
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
Indirect servicing |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,026 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two primary classes of loan servicing rights for which the Company separately
manages the economic risks: residential mortgage and SBA. Residential mortgage servicing rights
and SBA loan servicing rights are initially recorded at fair value and then accounted for at the
lower of cost or market and amortized in proportion to, and over the estimated period that net
servicing income is expected to be received based on projections of the amount and timing of
estimated future net cash flows. The amount and timing of estimated future net cash flows are
updated based on actual results and updated projections. The Company periodically evaluates its
loan servicing rights for impairment.
Residential Mortgage Loans
The Company typically sells first lien residential mortgage loans to third party investors
including Fannie Mae. Certain of these loans are exchanged for cash and servicing rights, which
generate servicing assets for the Company. The servicing assets are recorded initially at fair
value. As seller, the Company has made certain standard representations and warranties with
respect to the originally transferred loans. The Company estimates its reserves under such
arrangements predominantly based on prior experience. To date, the Companys estimate of reserve,
actual buy-backs as well as asserted claims under these provisions have been de minimus.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company sold residential mortgage
loans with unpaid principal balances of $312 million and $32 million, respectively on which the
Company retained the related mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) and receives servicing fees. At June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the approximate weighted average servicing fee was .25% of the
outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans. The weighted average coupon interest rate
on the portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for others was 4.53% and 4.43% at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively.
The following is an analysis of the activity in the Companys residential MSR and impairment
for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning carrying value |
|
$ |
7,109 |
|
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
5,495 |
|
|
$ |
875 |
|
Additions |
|
|
2,002 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
3,810 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Impairment, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending carrying value |
|
$ |
8,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
$ |
8,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Servicing Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
Additions |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
The Company uses assumptions and estimates in determining the impairment of capitalized
MSRs. These assumptions include prepayment speeds and discount rates commensurate with the risks
involved and comparable to assumptions used by market participants to value and bid MSRs available
for sale in the market. At June 30, 2011, the sensitivity of the current fair value of the
residential mortgage servicing rights to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in key economic
assumptions are included in the accompanying table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
$ |
9,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Residential Loans Serviced for Others: |
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate mortgage loans |
|
|
97 |
% |
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans |
|
|
3 |
% |
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Term |
|
25.3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment Speed |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase |
|
$ |
(316 |
) |
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate |
|
|
9.08 |
% |
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase |
|
$ |
(340 |
) |
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase |
|
|
(658 |
) |
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be
predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in value based on adverse changes in
assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption
to the change in value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of an adverse variation
in a particular assumption on the value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other
assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example,
increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which may magnify or
counteract the effect of the change.
Information about the asset quality of mortgage loans managed by the Company is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Delinquent (days) |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90+ |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Servicing Portfolio |
|
$ |
815,054 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale |
|
|
46,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans Held-for-Investment |
|
|
29,985 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Residential Mortgages Serviced |
|
$ |
891,881 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA Loans
Certain transfers of SBA loans were executed with third parties. These SBA loans, which are
typically partially guaranteed or otherwise credit enhanced, are generally secured by business
property such as inventory, equipment and accounts receivable. As seller, the Company had made
certain representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and the
Company has not incurred any material losses with respect to such representations and warranties.
In 2010, consistent with the updated guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets,
because the Company warranted the borrower would make all scheduled payments for the first 90 days
following the sale of certain SBA loans, certain loan sales were accounted for as secured
borrowings which resulted in an increase in Cash for the proceeds of the borrowing and an increase
in Other Short-Term Borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. No gain or loss was recognized
for the proceeds of secured borrowings. When the 90 day warranty period expired, the secured
borrowing was reduced, loans were reduced, and a gain or loss on sale was recorded in SBA Lending
Activities in the Consolidated Statement of Income. In the first quarter of 2011, the 90 day
warranty following the sale was removed, and the Bank began recognizing gains on sales of SBA loans
concurrent with the sales transaction.
24
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company sold SBA loans with unpaid
principal balances of $68 million and $7 million, respectively. The Company retained the related
loan servicing rights and receives servicing fees. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
approximate weighted average servicing fee as a percentage of the outstanding balance of the SBA
loans was .90% and .94%, respectively. The weighted average coupon interest rate on the portfolio
of loans serviced for others was 4.72% and 4.24% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively.
The following is an analysis of the activity in the Companys SBA loan servicing rights and
impairment for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
SBA Loan Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning carrying value |
|
$ |
3,350 |
|
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
$ |
2,624 |
|
|
$ |
2,405 |
|
Additions |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
Impairment, net |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending carrying value |
|
$ |
4,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,196 |
|
|
$ |
4,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
SBA Servicing Rights Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
Additions |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA loan servicing rights are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at the lower of cost
or market and are amortized in proportion to, and over the estimated period that, net servicing
income is expected to be received based on projections of the amount and timing of estimated future
net cash flows. The amount and timing of estimated future net cash flows are updated based on
actual results and updated projections. The Company periodically evaluates its loan servicing
rights for impairment.
The Company uses assumptions and estimates in determining the impairment of capitalized SBA
loan servicing rights. These assumptions include prepayment speeds and discount rates commensurate
with the risks involved and comparable to assumptions used by market participants to value and bid
servicing rights available for sale in the market. At June 30, 2011, the sensitivity of the
current fair value of the SBA loan servicing rights to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in key
economic assumptions are included in the accompanying table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA Loan Servicing Rights |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of SBA Servicing Rights |
|
$ |
5,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of SBA Loans Serviced for Others: |
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate SBA loans |
|
|
0 |
% |
Adjustable-rate SBA loans |
|
|
100 |
% |
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Term |
|
21.4 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment Speed |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase |
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate |
|
|
4.73 |
% |
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase |
|
$ |
(151 |
) |
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase |
|
|
(297 |
) |
25
The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be
predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in value based on adverse changes in
assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption
to the change in value may not be linear. Also in this table, the effect of an adverse variation
in a particular assumption on the value of the SBA servicing rights is calculated without changing
any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may magnify or counteract the effect
of the change.
Information about the asset quality of SBA loans managed by Fidelity is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
Delinquent (days) |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
30 to 89 |
|
|
90+ |
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA Serviced for Others Portfolio |
|
$ |
155,796 |
|
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
SBA Loans Held-for-Sale |
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA Loans Held-for-Investment |
|
|
83,172 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total SBA Loans Serviced |
|
$ |
259,798 |
|
|
$ |
3,925 |
|
|
$ |
9,912 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect Loans
The Bank purchases, on a nonrecourse basis, consumer installment contracts secured by new and
used vehicles purchased by consumers from franchised motor vehicle dealers and selected independent
dealers located throughout the Southeast. A portion of the indirect automobile loans the Bank
originates is sold with servicing retained. Certain of these loans are exchanged for cash and
servicing rights, which generate servicing assets for the Company. The servicing assets are
recorded initially at fair value and subsequently amortized and evaluated for impairment. As
seller, the Company has made certain standard representations and warranties with respect to the
originally transferred loans. The estimate of reserve related to this liability, amount of loans
repurchased as well as asserted claims under these provisions have been de minimus.
11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, an update to ASC 820-10, Fair Value
Measurements. This update adds a new requirement to disclose transfers in and out of level 1 and
level 2, along with the reasons for the transfers, and requires a gross presentation of purchases
and sales of level 3 activities. Additionally, the update clarifies that entities provide fair
value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and that entities provide
enhanced disclosures around level 2 valuation techniques and inputs. The Company adopted the
disclosure requirements for level 1 and level 2 transfers and the expanded fair value measurement
and valuation disclosures effective January 1, 2010. The disclosure requirements for level 3
activities were effective on January 1, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 had no impact on the
Companys financial position and statement of income.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 an update to Subsequent Events (Topic 855)
to clarify that an SEC filer must evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial
statements are issued. The update removes the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date
through which subsequent events were evaluated. ASU No. 2010-09 was effective upon issuance and
was adopted by the Company immediately. This ASU did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial condition and statements of income.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is
Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset which clarifies that modifications of loans
that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30, which provides guidance on accounting
for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon acquisition, do not result in
the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification would otherwise be considered a
troubled debt restructuring. This ASU is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within
pools occurring in the first interim period ending after July 15, 2010.
This ASU did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position and statement of
income.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20 Disclosures about the Credit Quality of
Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses which amends Topic 310 to improve the
disclosures that an entity provides about the credit quality of its financing receivables and the
related allowance for credit losses. As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to
disaggregate by portfolio segment or class certain existing disclosures and provide certain new
disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses. For public
entities, the disclosures as of the end of a reporting period were effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs
during a reporting period were effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. These disclosures are included in Note 9. ASU No. 2011-01 issued in
January 2011, temporarily delayed the effective date for the disclosures for troubled debt
restructurings to allow the FASB to complete its deliberations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02 A Creditors Determination of Whether a
Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring which clarifies a creditors determination of
whether it has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for
purposes of determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. This
ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2011. The Company
has made the proper disclosure in these interim financial statement footnotes and is evaluating the
impact of the adoption of this ASU on its financial position and statement of income.
26
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 Reconsideration of Effective Control for
Repurchase Agreements which removes from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion
requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on
substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the
collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. This ASU is effective
for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does
not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial position and
statement of income.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value
Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs which result in common fair value
measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs by changing the wording used to
describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP and is generally not intended to result in a change
in the application of the requirements. This ASU is effective for the first interim or annual
period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
ASU to have a material impact on its financial position and statement of income.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05 Presentation of Comprehensive Income which
gives an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net
income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The ASU does not change the
items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. This ASU is effective for the first
interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the
adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial position and statement of income.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following analysis reviews important factors affecting our financial condition at June 30,
2011, compared to December 31, 2010, and compares the results of operations for the second quarter
and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These comments should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing in this report and the Risk
Factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. All
percentage and dollar variances noted in the following analysis are calculated from the balances
presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report on Form 10-Q may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, that reflect our current expectations relating to present or future trends or
factors generally affecting the banking industry and specifically affecting our operations, markets
and products. Without limiting the foregoing, the words believes, expects, anticipates,
estimates, projects, intends, and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions we believe
are reasonable and may relate to, among other things, the deteriorating economy and its impact on
operating results and credit quality, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, changes in
interest rates, and litigation results. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected for many reasons,
including without limitation, changing events and trends that have influenced our assumptions.
These trends and events include (1) risks associated with our loan portfolio, including
difficulties in maintaining quality loan growth, greater loan losses than historic levels, the risk
of an insufficient allowance for loan losses, and expenses associated with managing nonperforming
assets, unique risks associated with our construction and land development loans, our ability to
maintain and service relationships with automobile dealers and indirect automobile loan purchasers,
and our ability to profitably manage changes in our indirect automobile lending operations; (2)
risks associated with adverse economic conditions, including risk of a continued decline in real
estate values in the Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area and in eastern and northern Florida
markets, conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions generally and the impact of
recent efforts to address difficult market and economic conditions; a stagnant economy and its
impact on operations and credit quality, the impact of a recession on our consumer loan portfolio
and its potential impact on our commercial portfolio, changes in the interest rate environment and
their impact on our net interest margin, and inflation; (3) risks associated with government
regulation and programs, including risks arising from the terms of the U.S. Treasury Departments
(the Treasurys) equity investment in us, and the resulting limitations on executive compensation
imposed through our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program, uncertainty with respect to
future governmental economic
and regulatory measures, including the ability of the Treasury to unilaterally amend any
provision of the purchase agreement we entered into as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program,
the winding down of governmental emergency measures intended to stabilize the financial system, and
numerous legislative proposals to further regulate the financial services industry, the impact of
and
27
adverse changes in the governmental regulatory requirements affecting us, and changes in
political, legislative and economic conditions; (4) the ability to maintain adequate liquidity and
sources of liquidity; (5) our ability to maintain sufficient capital and to raise additional
capital; (6) the accuracy and completeness of information from customers and our counterparties;
(7) the effectiveness of our controls and procedures; (8) our ability to attract and retain skilled
people; (9) greater competitive pressures among financial institutions in our market; (10) failure
to achieve the revenue increases expected to result from our investments in our growth strategies,
including our branch additions and in our transaction deposit and lending businesses; (11) the
volatility and limited trading of our common stock; and (12) the impact of dilution on our common
stock.
This list is intended to identify some of the principal factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements included herein
and are not intended to represent a complete list of all risks and uncertainties in our business.
Investors are encouraged to read the related section in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including the Risk Factors set forth therein. Additional information and other factors that
could affect future financial results are included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and conform to general practices within the financial services industry. Our
financial position and results of operations are affected by managements application of accounting
policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of
assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues, expenses and related disclosures.
Different assumptions in the application of these policies, or conditions significantly different
from certain assumptions, could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position
or consolidated results of operations. Critical accounting and reporting policies include those
related to the allowance for loan losses, fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale, the
capitalization of servicing assets and liabilities and the related amortization, loan related
revenue recognition, and income taxes. Our accounting policies are fundamental to understanding
our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Significant accounting
policies have been periodically discussed and reviewed with and approved by the Board of Directors.
Our critical accounting policies that are highly dependent on estimates, assumptions, and
judgment are substantially unchanged from the descriptions included in the notes to consolidated
financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Results of Operations
Net Income
For the second quarter of 2011, the Company recorded net income of $3.6 million compared to
net income of $4.9 million for the second quarter of 2010. Net income available to common equity
was $2.8 million and $4.0 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2011 were $0.24 and $.21,
respectively, compared to $0.38 and $0.33, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
The decrease in net income for the second quarter of 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010
was primarily due to a $3.7 million increase in provision for loan losses and a $2.1 million
increase in noninterest expense somewhat offset by increased noninterest income and net interest
income.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $5.5 million compared to $5.1 million
for the same period in 2010. Net income available to common equity was $3.8 million and $3.4
million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Basic and diluted
earnings per share for the first six months of 2011 were $0.34 and $0.30, respectively, compared to
$0.32 and $0.29 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in net income for the six
months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010 was primarily due to an $8.0
million increase in noninterest income and a $3.4 million increase in net interest income somewhat
offset by a $5.5 million increase in provision for loan loss and a $5.5 million increase in
noninterest expense.
28
Details of the changes in the various components of net income are further discussed below.
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTER ENDED |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
1,550,103 |
|
|
$ |
21,103 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
$ |
1,436,360 |
|
|
$ |
21,701 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
% |
Tax-exempt(1) |
|
|
5,067 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,555,170 |
|
|
|
21,180 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
|
1,441,629 |
|
|
|
21,781 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
227,412 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
289,034 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
% |
Tax-exempt(2) |
|
|
11,704 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
|
11,706 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
239,116 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
300,740 |
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
86,841 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
42,148 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,881,860 |
|
|
|
23,180 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
% |
|
|
1,785,121 |
|
|
$ |
24,527 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
27,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(29,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
20,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate |
|
|
20,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
85,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,006,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,880,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
416,214 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
$ |
288,301 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
417,580 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
454,791 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
634,012 |
|
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
655,751 |
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,467,806 |
|
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
1,398,843 |
|
|
|
6,349 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
14,788 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
23,149 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
% |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
20,495 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
26,813 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
% |
Long-term debt |
|
|
54,505 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,625,121 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
% |
|
|
1,569,299 |
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
207,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
25,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
148,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,006,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,880,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/spread |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,134 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,328 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest income includes the effect of taxable equivalent adjustment for 2011 and 2010 of $27,000 and $27,000, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income includes the effect of taxable-equivalent adjustment for 2011 and 2010 of $62,000 and $60,000, respectively. |
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year To Date |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
$ |
1,560,728 |
|
|
$ |
42,943 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
$ |
1,413,338 |
|
|
$ |
42,713 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
Tax-exempt(1) |
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,565,821 |
|
|
|
43,098 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
|
1,418,632 |
|
|
|
42,873 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
201,539 |
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
243,971 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
Tax-exempt(2) |
|
|
11,704 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
% |
|
|
11,706 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
213,243 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
% |
|
|
255,677 |
|
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
76,705 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
92,295 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,856,587 |
|
|
|
46,713 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
1,767,207 |
|
|
$ |
47,848 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
29,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(28,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
20,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate |
|
|
20,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
84,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,983,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,866,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
415,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
$ |
274,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,232 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
|
412,697 |
|
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
448,381 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
1.57 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
624,924 |
|
|
|
5,375 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
673,241 |
|
|
|
8,493 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,453,615 |
|
|
|
8,980 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1,395,629 |
|
|
|
13,225 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
20,702 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
21,773 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
% |
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
10,801 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
27,155 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
Subordinated debt |
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
% |
|
|
67,527 |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
6.69 |
% |
Long-term debt |
|
|
64,199 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,616,844 |
|
|
|
12,319 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1,563,576 |
|
|
|
16,867 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
198,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
24,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
144,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,983,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,866,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/spread |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,394 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,981 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest income includes the effect of taxable equivalent adjustment for 2011 and 2010 of $54,000 and $55,000, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income includes the effect of taxable-equivalent adjustment for 2011 and 2010 of $123,000 and $121,000, respectively. |
Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011, increased $804,000 or 5.0%
to $17.0 million compared to the same period in 2010. The cost of funds on total interest bearing
liabilities decreased 60 basis points to 1.49% for the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same
period in 2010 as a result of a continued reduction in deposit interest rates in response to the
market and our local competition. The average balance of interest-earning assets increased by
$96.7 million or 5.4% to $1.882 billion for the second quarter of 2011, when compared to the same
period in 2010. The yield on interest-earning assets for the second quarter of 2011 was 4.94%, a
decrease of 57 basis points when compared to the yield on interest-earning assets for the same
period in 2010. The average balance of loans outstanding for the second quarter of 2011 increased
$113.5 million or 7.9% to $1.555 billion when
compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in the loan portfolio was led by growth in the
indirect lending portfolio due to competitive pricing in the marketplace and a general recovery of
automobile sales. The yield on average loans outstanding for the quarter ended June 30, 2011
decreased 60 basis points to 5.46% when compared to the same period in 2010.
30
Net interest income for the first six months ended June 30, 2011, increased $3.4 million or
11.1% to $34.2 million compared to the same period in 2010. The cost of funds on total interest
bearing liabilities decreased 64 basis points to 1.54% for the first half of 2011 compared to the
same period in 2010 as a result of a continued reduction in deposit interest rates. The average
balance of interest-earning assets increased by $89.4 million or 5.1% to $1.857 billion for the
first half of 2011, when compared to the same period in 2010. The yield on interest-earning assets
for the first six months of 2011 was 5.07%, a decrease of 39 basis points when compared to the
yield on interest-earning assets for the same period in 2010. The average balance of loans
outstanding for the first half of 2011 increased $147.2 million or 10.4% to $1.566 billion when
compared to the same period in 2010 led by an increase in the indirect lending portfolio.
The Bank manages its net interest spread and net interest margin based primarily on its loan
and deposit pricing. As part of managements concerted effort to reduce the cost of funds on
deposits, there was a shift in the mix of deposits from higher cost certificate of deposits to
lower cost savings and money market accounts. Management will continue to review its deposit
pricing in 2011 and forecasts a continued decrease to cost of funds as higher priced certificates
of deposit and brokered deposits mature and reset to lower interest rates.
Provision for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established and maintained through provisions charged to
operations. Such provisions are based on managements evaluation of the loan portfolio including
loan portfolio concentrations, current economic conditions, past loan loss experience, adequacy of
underlying collateral, and such other factors which, in managements judgment, require
consideration in estimating loan losses. Loans are charged off or charged down when, in the
opinion of management, such loans are deemed to be uncollectible or not fully collectible.
Subsequent recoveries are added to the allowance.
For all loan categories, historical loan loss experience, adjusted for changes in the risk
characteristics of each loan category, current trends, and other factors, is used to determine the
level of allowance required. Additional amounts are allocated based on the probable losses of
individual impaired loans and the effect of economic conditions on both individual loans and loan
categories. Since the allocation is based on estimates and subjective judgment, it is not
necessarily indicative of the specific amounts of losses that may ultimately occur.
The allowance for loan losses for homogenous pools is allocated to loan types based on
historical net charge-off rates adjusted for any current trends or other factors. The specific
allowance for individually reviewed nonperforming loans and loans having greater than normal risk
characteristics is based on a specific loan impairment analysis which in many cases relies
predominantly on the adequacy of loan collateral.
In determining the appropriate level for the allowance, management ensures that the overall
allowance appropriately reflects a margin for the imprecision inherent in most estimates of the
range of probable credit losses. This additional amount, if any, is reflected in the overall
allowance. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to provide for losses
inherent in the loan portfolio at June 30, 2011 (see Asset Quality).
The provision for loan losses for the second quarter and first six months of 2011 was $4.9
million and $10.6 million, respectively, compared to $1.2 million and $5.1 million for the same
periods in 2010. The increase was a result of an increase in general reserves related to growth in
the loan portfolio, an increase in specific reserves on impaired loans, and an increase in net
charge-offs. From January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2011, net charge-offs were $79.9 million and the
Company recorded an aggregate provision for loan losses of $93.1 million. For every dollar of net
charge-offs realized, the Company recorded $1.17 in provision during this period.
31
The following schedule summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
28,082 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
|
$ |
30,072 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
SBA |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Real estate-construction |
|
|
6,162 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
Real estate-mortgage |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
Consumer installment |
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
|
7,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
9,440 |
|
|
|
8,574 |
|
|
|
20,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
SBA |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Real estate-construction |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Real estate-mortgage |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Consumer installment |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
8,906 |
|
|
|
8,093 |
|
|
|
19,115 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
10,625 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
17,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
29,801 |
|
|
$ |
27,104 |
|
|
$ |
28,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized ratio of net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at end of period |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBA loan net charge-offs were $475,000 for the first six months of 2011 compared to $140,000
for the same period in 2010. Nonaccrual loans increased from $10.2 million at June 30, 2010 to
$14.6 million at June 30, 2011. Management expects charge-offs to be consistent with the first
half of 2011 through the end of 2011.
Construction loan net charge-offs were $6.1 million in the first six months of 2011 compared
to $4.2 million in the same period of 2010 and $6.7 million in the last six months of 2010.
Management will continue to monitor closely and aggressively address credit quality and trends in
the residential construction loan portfolio.
Substantially all of the consumer installment loan net charge-offs in the first six months of
2011 and 2010 were from the indirect automobile loan portfolio. Consumer installment loan net
charge-offs decreased $1.5 million to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared
to the same period in 2010 as the overall economy showed signs of improvement. The annualized
ratio of net charge-offs to average consumer loans outstanding was .54% and 1.13% during the first
six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2011 was $14.1 million compared to $11.2 million
for the same period in 2010, an increase of $2.8 million for the three month period. For the six
month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to 2010, noninterest income increased $8.0 million to
$25.8 million. The increases were a result of higher income from SBA lending activities, and
higher income from mortgage banking activities, somewhat offset by lower securities gains.
For the second quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010,
income from SBA lending activities increased $2.9 million and $5.0 million to $3.6 million and $5.8
million, respectively, due to an increase in the gain on loans sold. SBA loans sold totaled $43.6
million and $68.3 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to $6.5
million sold in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 because of the updated accounting
guidance for transfers of financial assets effective January 1, 2010. With the improvement in
credit markets, demand for loan sales and therefore the market price and profit on loan sales
continued to improve in 2011.
Income from mortgage banking activities increased $959,000 and $3.6 million to $5.5 million
and $11.4 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the
same periods in 2010 due to a $539,000 and $2.6 million
increase in the gain on loans sold, and a $460,000 and $908,000 increase in other fee income.
Mortgage loans sold totaled $262 million and $573 million for the second quarter and first six
months of 2011, respectively, compared to $212 million and $394 million sold in the second quarter
and first six months of 2010. Historically low interest rates and an increase in origination staff
contributed to the increase in the volume of loans originated.
32
Securities gains decreased $1.2 million to $1.1 million for both the second quarter and first
six months of 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010 because of a decrease in the volume of
securities sold for the periods. In 2011, the Bank sold $31.7 million compared to $102.8 million
for 2010.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense was $20.9 million for the second quarter of 2011, compared to $18.8
million for the same period in 2010, an increase of $2.1 million or 10.9%. For the six months
ended June 30, 2011, noninterest expense increased $5.5 million to $41.4 million compared to the
same period in 2010. For the second quarter, the increase was a result of higher salaries and
benefits expense which increased $1.6 million or 16.2% as a result of increased commission expense
related to higher SBA loan sales, the expansion of the mortgage division and an increase in lenders
in the Commercial, Private Banking and Indirect Auto Lending divisions. Other operating expense
increased $492,000 or 22.2% due to higher other insurance expense, higher losses and reserves
primarily related to the establishment of certain mortgage lending reserves, and higher credit
reporting expense due to loan growth in the mortgage division. Other real estate expense decreased
$565,000 or 24.0% to $1.8 million due primarily to lower write-downs related to ORE. For the six
months ended June 30, 2011, the increase was a result of higher salaries and benefits expense which
increased $3.6 million or 18.8% as a result of the expansion of the mortgage division and an
increase in lenders in the SBA, Commercial, Private Banking and Indirect Auto Lending divisions.
Other operating expense increased $1.3 million or 32.2% due to higher other losses, other insurance
expense, higher credit reporting expense due to loan growth in the mortgage division and an
increase in advertising expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Writedown of ORE |
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,615 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
% |
|
$ |
2,669 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,983 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
% |
ORE real property taxes |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Foreclosure expense |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
ORE misc. expense |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operation of ORE |
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,358 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,251 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,527 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the second quarter of 2011 was $1.8 million, compared to
$2.6 million for the same period in 2010. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, provision
for income taxes was $2.6 million and equal to the amount in the six month period ended June 30,
2010. The decreased income tax expense for the second quarter of 2011 was primarily the result of
a decrease in income before taxes. The effective income tax rate at June 30, 2011, differs from
the statutory rate primarily due to benefits related to increases in the cash surrender value of
life insurance.
Taxes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 740-10-05. Under the liability method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities (net DTA) are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. A charge to establish a valuation allowance is
recognized if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood
of more than 50 percent) some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Four sources of taxable income are considered in determining whether a valuation allowance is
required, included as set forth within ASC 740: taxable income in prior years, future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies and future taxable income.
Management has concluded that it will more likely than not realize the benefit of its net DTA as of
June 30, 2011, based to a large extent on its reliance on projections of future taxable income.
Management believes that sufficient taxable income will be present in near term future periods to
fully realize these net DTAs.
Management also recognizes that the actual results could not only be impacted by the
operational decisions it makes and strategies it pursues, but also by factors beyond its control
and that can be difficult to predict such as macro and/or regional economic trends. Management
continues to see improvement in certain key drivers of the Companys operational performance such
as credit, pricing, and expenses. However, the general economic conditions, while showing
continued signs of improvement, remain adverse
with elevated unemployment and uncertainty related to the future interest rate environment and real
estate values in its primary markets. As a result, the Companys net DTA of $17.1 million as of
June 30, 2011, could require a partial or full valuation allowance in future periods to the extent
future taxable income does not occur at levels sufficient to support the amounts projected to be
needed to realize the net DTA and Projections of future taxable income are required to be revised.
The deferred tax asset balance was $16.6 million at December 31, 2010 and $11.2 million at June 30,
2010.
33
Financial Condition
Total assets were $2.044 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $1.945 billion at December 31,
2010, an increase of $99.0 million, or 5.1%. This increase was due to an increase of $147.2
million in cash and cash equivalents and a $55.3 million increase in loans, somewhat offset by a
$111.6 million decrease in loans held-for-sale.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $147.2 million or 308.3% to $195.0 million at June 30,
2011, compared to December 31, 2010. This balance varies with the Banks liquidity needs and is
influenced by scheduled loan closings, investment purchases, timing of customer deposits, and loan
sales. The Bank settled on $56.1 million in investment sales and calls during the last two weeks
of June 2011.
Loans increased $55.3 million or 3.9% to $1.459 billion at June 30, 2011, compared to $1.403
billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in loans was primarily the result of an increase in
consumer loans of $77.0 million or 10.8% to $793.2 million. Consumer installment loans increased
as the Bank grew its indirect automobile loan portfolio by expanding its lending area. Somewhat
offsetting these increases was a decrease in real estate construction loans of $12.8 million or
11.2% to $102.4 million. As the slow real estate market continued during the first six months of
2011, demand for construction loans continued to be limited and the portfolio balance continued to
decrease including $6.4 million in loans that were transferred to other real estate.
Loans held-for-sale decreased $111.6 million or 53.2% to $98.3 million at June 30, 2011,
compared to December 31, 2010. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in mortgage loans
held-for-sale as a result of an increase in mortgage interest rates during the first quarter of
2011 which slowed down loan volume related to refinancing activity.
The following schedule summarizes our total loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
386,365 |
|
|
$ |
384,220 |
|
SBA loans |
|
|
83,172 |
|
|
|
94,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
469,537 |
|
|
|
478,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
102,377 |
|
|
|
115,224 |
|
|
Indirect loans |
|
|
773,859 |
|
|
|
695,754 |
|
Installment loans |
|
|
19,291 |
|
|
|
20,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
793,150 |
|
|
|
716,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans |
|
|
36,036 |
|
|
|
34,367 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
57,558 |
|
|
|
59,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loan |
|
|
93,594 |
|
|
|
93,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
1,458,658 |
|
|
|
1,403,372 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(29,801 |
) |
|
|
(28,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance |
|
$ |
1,428,857 |
|
|
$ |
1,375,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
1,458,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,403,372 |
|
Loans Held-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
47,503 |
|
|
|
155,029 |
|
Indirect |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
SBA |
|
|
20,830 |
|
|
|
24,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,333 |
|
|
|
209,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,556,991 |
|
|
$ |
1,613,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Asset Quality
The following schedule summarizes our asset quality at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Nonperforming assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
69,654 |
|
|
$ |
76,545 |
|
Repossessions |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
21,026 |
|
|
|
20,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
|
91,612 |
|
|
|
98,189 |
|
Other classified assets |
|
|
30,884 |
|
|
|
39,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total classified assets |
|
$ |
122,496 |
|
|
$ |
137,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includes SBA guaranteed loans of approximately |
|
$ |
6,669 |
|
|
$ |
7,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
29,801 |
|
|
$ |
28,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of loans past due and still accruing to loans |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total loans, ORE, and repossessions |
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to period-end loans |
|
|
2.04 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans and repossessions (coverage ratio) |
|
|
.42 |
x |
|
|
.36 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified assets to tier one capital and allowance for loan losses |
|
|
51.06 |
% |
|
|
66.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $69.7 million in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011, included $45.9 million in residential
construction related loans, $18.4 million in commercial and SBA loans and $5.4 million in retail
and consumer loans. Of the $45.9 million in residential construction related loans on nonaccrual,
$13.4 million was related to 95 single family construction loans with completed homes and homes in
various stages of completion, $22.5 million was related to 736 single family developed lots, and
$10.0 million related to other loans.
The $21.0 million in other real estate at June 30, 2011, was made up of eight commercial
properties with a balance of $6.0 million and the remainder were residential construction related
balances which consisted of $4.4 million in 46 residential single family homes completed or
substantially completed, $10.1 million in 431 single family developed lots, and $490,000 in one
parcel of undeveloped land.
The Bank makes standard representations and warranties in the normal course of selling
mortgage loans in the secondary market. We have not experienced any material repurchase requests
as a result of these obligations related to the representations and warranties. The Bank does not
securitize the mortgages it originates.
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Core deposits(1) |
|
$ |
1,363.5 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,304.5 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
% |
Time deposits greater than $100,000 |
|
|
302.5 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
246.3 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Brokered deposits |
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,708.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,613.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Core deposits include noninterest-bearing demand, money market and interest-bearing demand, savings deposits, and time deposits less than $100,000. |
Total deposits at June 30, 2011, were $1.708 billion compared to $1.613 billion at
December 31, 2010, a $95.2 million or 5.9% increase. Along with the increase in total deposits,
the designed change to the deposit mix and interest rate paid on deposits demonstrates the
Companys commitment to improved net interest margin and liquidity. Time deposits greater than
$100,000 increased $56.1 million or 22.8% to $302.5 million. Savings deposits increased $22.1
million or 5.6% to $420.1 million. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $29.4 million or
15.8% to $215.0 million. Time deposits greater than $100,000 increased as management began to
prepare for future increases in interest rates by lengthening deposit maturities. Savings accounts
increased as customers sought higher yields while still maintaining liquidity. Noninterest-bearing
demand accounts increased primarily due to unlimited protection from the FDIC under the Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program as well as increases in deposits associated with mortgage and SBA
escrow accounts.
35
Other Long-Term Debt
Other long-term debt decreased $22.5 million or 30.0% to $52.5 million at June 30, 2011,
compared to $75.0 million at December 31, 2010. The decrease is a result of the reclassification
of three FHLB advances totaling $22.5 million from long-term borrowings to short-term borrowings.
A $5.0 million 3.29% FHLB advance maturing March 12, 2012, a $2.5 million 3.25% FHLB advances
maturing April 2, 2012, and a $15.0 million 2.56% FHLB advance maturing April 13, 2012 were
reclassified during the first half of 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Long-Term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB three year Fixed Rate Advance with interest at 1.76% maturing July 16, 2013 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
FHLB four year Fixed Rate Advance with interest at 3.2875% maturing March 12, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
FHLB five year European Convertible Advance with interest at 2.395% maturing March 12,
2013, with a one-time FHLB conversion option to reprice to a three-month LIBOR-based
floating rate at the end of two years |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
FHLB five year European Convertible Advance with interest at 2.79% maturing March 12,
2013, with a one-time FHLB conversion option to reprice to a three-month LIBOR-based
floating rate at the end of three years |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
FHLB four year Fixed Rate Credit Advance with interest at 3.24% maturing April 2, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
FHLB five year European Convertible Advance with interest at 2.40% maturing April 3,
2013, with a one-time FHLB conversion option to reprice to a three-month LIBOR-based
floating rate at the end of two years |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
FHLB four year Fixed Rate Credit Advance with interest at 2.90% maturing March 11, 2013 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
FHLB three year Fixed Rate Credit Advance with interest at 2.56% maturing April 13, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Debt
The Company has five unconsolidated business trust (trust preferred) subsidiaries that are
variable interest entities. The Companys subordinated debt consists of the outstanding
obligations of the five trust preferred issues and the amounts to fund the investments in the
common stock of those entities.
The following schedule summarizes our subordinated debt at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
|
|
Type |
|
Issued(1) |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Trust Preferred |
|
March 8, 2000 |
|
$ |
10,825 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
@ 10.875% |
|
Trust Preferred |
|
July 19, 2000 |
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
@ 11.045% |
|
Trust Preferred |
|
June 26, 2003 |
|
|
15,464 |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
@ 3.346%(2) |
|
Trust Preferred |
|
March 17, 2005 |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
@ 2.135%(3) |
|
Trust Preferred |
|
August 20, 2007 |
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
@ 6.620%(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each trust preferred security has a final maturity thirty years from the date of issuance. |
|
(2) |
|
Reprices quarterly at a rate 310 basis points over three month LIBOR and is subject to refinancing or repayment at par with regulatory approval. |
|
(3) |
|
Reprices quarterly at a rate 189 basis points over three month LIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Five year fixed rate, and then reprices quarterly at a rate 140 basis points over three month LIBOR. |
36
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Market and public confidence in our financial strength and that of financial institutions in
general will largely determine the access to appropriate levels of liquidity. This confidence is
significantly dependent on our ability to maintain sound credit quality and the ability to maintain
appropriate levels of capital resources.
Liquidity is defined as the ability to meet anticipated customer demands for funds under
credit commitments and deposit withdrawals at a reasonable cost and on a timely basis. Management
measures the liquidity position by giving consideration to both on-balance sheet and off-balance
sheet sources of and demands for funds on a daily and weekly basis. In addition, because FSC is a
separate entity and apart from the Bank, it must provide for its own liquidity. FSC is responsible
for the payment of dividends declared for its common and preferred shareholders, and interest and
principal on any outstanding debt or trust preferred securities.
Sources of the Banks liquidity include cash and cash equivalents, net of Federal
requirements to maintain reserves against deposit liabilities; investment securities eligible for
sale or pledging to secure borrowings from dealers and customers pursuant to securities sold under
agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements); loan repayments; loan sales; deposits and
certain interest-sensitive deposits; brokered deposits; a collateralized line of credit at the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (FRB) Discount Window; a collateralized line of credit from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB); and borrowings under unsecured overnight Federal funds
lines available from correspondent banks. Substantially all of FSCs liquidity is obtained from
subsidiary service fees and dividends from the Bank, which is limited by applicable law. The
principal demands for liquidity are new loans, anticipated fundings under credit commitments to
customers and deposit withdrawals.
Management seeks to maintain a stable net liquidity position while optimizing operating
results, as reflected in net interest income, the net yield on interest-earning assets and the cost
of interest-bearing liabilities in particular. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO)
meets regularly to review the current and projected net liquidity positions and to review actions
taken by management to achieve this liquidity objective. Managing the levels of total liquidity,
short-term liquidity, and short-term liquidity sources continues to be an important exercise
because of the coordination of the projected mortgage, SBA and indirect automobile loan production
and sales, loans held-for-sale balances, and individual loans and pools of loans sold anticipated
to increase from time to time during the year.
In addition to the ability to increase brokered deposits and retail deposits, as of June 30,
2011, we had the following sources of available unused liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Unpledged securities |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
9,000 |
|
FRB lines |
|
|
189,000 |
|
Unsecured Federal funds lines |
|
|
47,000 |
|
Additional FRB line based on eligible but unpledged collateral |
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources of available unused liquidity |
|
$ |
472,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys net liquid asset ratio, defined as federal funds sold, investments maturing
within 30 days, unpledged securities, available unsecured federal funds lines of credit, FHLB
borrowing capacity and available brokered certificates of deposit divided by total assets was 16.6%
at June 30, 2010, 16.1% at December 31, 2010 and 23.6% at June 30, 2011.
Shareholders Equity
Shareholders equity was $159.8 million at June 30, 2011, and $140.5 million at December 31,
2010. The increase in shareholders equity in the first six months of 2011 was the result of a
private placement of common stock in May 2011 of $14.4 million and net income for the first half of
2011.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company exceeded all minimum capital ratios
required by the FRB, as reflected in the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRB Minimum |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
Capital Ratio |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
10.47 |
% |
|
|
9.36 |
% |
Risk-Based Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
12.78 |
|
|
|
10.87 |
|
Total |
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
14.80 |
|
|
|
13.28 |
|
37
The following table sets forth the capital requirements for the Bank under FDIC
regulations and the Banks capital ratios at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC Regulations |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
Well Capitalized |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Leverage |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
9.64 |
% |
|
|
9.49 |
% |
Risk-Based Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
11.75 |
|
|
|
11.02 |
|
Total |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
13.61 |
|
|
|
12.89 |
|
On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
Capital Purchase Program (the Program). On December 19, 2008, as part of the Program, Fidelity
entered into a Letter Agreement (Letter Agreement) and a Securities Purchase Agreement
Standard Terms with the Treasury, pursuant to which Fidelity agreed to issue and sell, and the
Treasury agreed to purchase (1) 48,200 shares of Fidelitys Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (2) a ten-year
warrant to purchase up to 2,266,458 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of
$3.19 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $48.2 million in cash. Pursuant to the terms
of the Letter Agreement, the ability of Fidelity to declare or pay dividends or distributions of
its common stock is subject to restrictions, including a restriction against increasing dividends
from the last quarterly cash dividend per share ($.01) declared on the common stock prior to
December 19, 2008, as adjusted for subsequent stock dividends and other similar actions. In
addition, as long as the preferred shares are outstanding, dividends payments are prohibited until
all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited
exceptions. This restriction will terminate on the third anniversary of the date of issuance,
December 19, 2011, of the preferred shares or, if earlier, the date on which the preferred shares
have been redeemed in whole or the Treasury has transferred all of the preferred shares to third
parties.
During the first six months of 2011 and 2010, we did not pay any cash dividends on our common
stock. On July 21, 2011, the Board of Directors reinstated the cash dividend by declaring a $.01
dividend per share on common stock payable on August 16, 2011, to shareholders of record on August
1, 2011. Dividends for the remainder of 2011 will be reviewed quarterly, with the declared and
paid dividend consistent with current earnings, capital requirements and forecasts of future
earnings.
Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposures are credit risk and interest rate risk and, to a lesser
extent, liquidity risk. We have little or no risk related to trading accounts, commodities, or
foreign exchange.
Interest rate risk is the exposure of a banking organizations financial condition and
earnings ability to withstand adverse movements in interest rates. Accepting this risk can be an
important source of profitability and shareholder value; however, excessive levels of interest rate
risk can pose a significant threat to assets, earnings, and capital. Accordingly, effective risk
management that maintains interest rate risk at prudent levels is essential to our success.
ALCO, which includes senior management representatives, monitors and considers methods of
managing the rate and sensitivity repricing characteristics of the balance sheet components
consistent with maintaining acceptable levels of changes in portfolio values and net interest
income with changes in interest rates. The primary purposes of ALCO are to manage interest rate
risk consistent with earnings and liquidity, to effectively invest our capital, and to preserve the
value created by our core business operations. Our exposure to interest rate risk compared to
established tolerances is reviewed on at least a quarterly basis by our Board of Directors.
Evaluating a financial institutions exposure to changes in interest rates includes assessing
both the adequacy of the management process used to control interest rate risk and the
organizations quantitative levels of exposure. When assessing the interest rate risk management
process, we seek to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, management information systems,
and internal controls are in place to maintain interest rate risk at prudent levels with
consistency and continuity. Evaluating the quantitative level of interest rate risk exposure
requires us to assess the existing and potential future effects of changes in interest rates on our
consolidated financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity, and, where
appropriate, asset quality.
Interest rate sensitivity analysis, referred to as equity at risk, is used to measure our
interest rate risk by computing estimated changes in earnings and the net present value of our cash
flows from assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed
changes in market interest rates. Net present value represents the market value of portfolio
equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with
adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in the
market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 200, 300 and 400 basis
point increase or decrease in market interest rates.
38
Our policy states that a negative change in net present value (equity at risk) as a result of
an immediate and sustained 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates should not exceed
the lesser of 2% of total assets or 15% of total regulatory capital. It also states that a similar
increase or decrease in interest rates should not negatively impact net interest income or net
income by more than 5% or 15%, respectively.
The most recent rate shock analysis indicated that the effects of an immediate and sustained
increase or decrease of 200 basis points in market rates of interest would fall within policy
parameters and approved tolerances for equity at risk, net interest income, and net income.
Rate shock analysis provides only a limited, point in time view of interest rate sensitivity.
The gap analysis also does not reflect factors such as the magnitude (versus the timing) of future
interest rate changes and asset prepayments. The actual impact of interest rate changes upon
earnings and net present value may differ from that implied by any static rate shock or gap
measurement. In addition, net interest income and net present value under various future interest
rate scenarios are affected by multiple other factors not embodied in a static rate shock or gap
analysis, including competition, changes in the shape of the Treasury yield curve, divergent
movement among various interest rate indices, and the speed with which interest rates change.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The major elements used to manage interest rate risk include the mix of fixed and variable
rate assets and liabilities and the maturity and repricing patterns of these assets and
liabilities. We perform a quarterly review of assets and liabilities that reprice and the time
bands within which the repricing occurs. Balances generally are reported in the time band that
corresponds to the instruments next repricing date or contractual maturity, whichever occurs
first. However, fixed rate indirect automobile loans, mortgage-backed securities, and residential
mortgage loans are primarily included based on scheduled payments with a prepayment factor
incorporated. Through such analyses, we monitor and manage our interest sensitivity gap to
minimize the negative effects of changing interest rates.
The interest rate sensitivity structure within our balance sheet at June 30, 2011, indicated a
cumulative net interest sensitivity asset gap of 18.61% when projecting out six months. When
projecting forward one year, there was a cumulative net interest sensitivity asset gap of 13.71%.
This information represents a general indication of repricing characteristics over time; however,
the sensitivity of certain deposit products may vary during extreme swings in the interest rate
cycle. Since all interest rates and yields do not adjust at the same velocity, the interest rate
sensitivity gap is only a general indicator of the potential effects of interest rate changes on
net interest income. Our policy states that the cumulative gap at six months and one year should
generally not exceed 15% and 10%, respectively. The primary reason the Bank exceeded the policy is
the temporary excess liquidity and cash equivalents. The policy exception has been reviewed and
approved by the Asset Liability Committee after reviewing the current and projected interest rate
environment.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See Item 2 Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity for quantitative and qualitative
discussion about our market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Fidelitys management
supervised and participated in an evaluation, with the participation of the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on, or as of the date of, that
evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
three months ended June 30, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
39
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to claims and lawsuits arising in the course of normal business activities.
Although the ultimate outcome of all claims and lawsuits outstanding as of June 30, 2011, cannot be
ascertained at this time, it is the opinion of management that these matters, when resolved, will
not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
While the Company attempts to identify, manage, and mitigate risks and uncertainties
associated with its business to the extent practical under the circumstances, some level of risk
and uncertainty will always be present. Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010, describes some of the risks and uncertainties associated with our
business. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our cash flows,
results of operations, and financial condition. We do not believe that there have been any
material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
(a) |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of Fidelity Southern
Corporation, as amended effective
December 16, 2008 (incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3(a) to
Fidelity Southern Corporations
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
(b) |
|
By-Laws of Fidelity Southern
Corporation, as amended (incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to
Fidelity Southern Corporations Form
8-k filed November 18, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIDELITY SOUTHERN
CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
BY: |
/s/ James B. Miller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
James B. Miller, Jr. |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 8, 2011 |
BY: |
/s/ Stephen H. Brolly
|
|
|
|
Stephen H. Brolly |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
40