10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended: June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to .
Commission File Number: 001-33603
The Dolan Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
43-2004527
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2300,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(Address, including zip code, of registrants principal executive offices)
(612) 317-9420
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On July 29, 2011, there were 30,576,953 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
The Dolan Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
|
$ |
4,862 |
|
Accounts receivable, including unbilled services (net of allowances for doubtful accounts
of $1,282 and $1,578 as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
66,493 |
|
|
|
59,801 |
|
Unbilled pass-through costs |
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
4,186 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
80,372 |
|
|
|
80,172 |
|
Investments |
|
|
12,898 |
|
|
|
13,808 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
17,532 |
|
|
|
17,333 |
|
Finite-life intangible assets, net |
|
|
186,063 |
|
|
|
195,959 |
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
|
|
226,418 |
|
|
|
225,373 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,816 |
|
|
|
3,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
526,099 |
|
|
$ |
535,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
8,992 |
|
|
$ |
7,578 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
15,232 |
|
|
|
15,589 |
|
Accrued pass-through liabilities |
|
|
11,325 |
|
|
|
18,271 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
5,409 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
5,537 |
|
Due to sellers of acquired businesses |
|
|
5,630 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
20,692 |
|
|
|
21,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
74,813 |
|
|
|
78,016 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
125,052 |
|
|
|
131,568 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,338 |
|
|
|
7,794 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
11,723 |
|
|
|
12,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
220,926 |
|
|
|
230,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
17,528 |
|
|
|
26,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized: 70,000,000 shares;
outstanding: 30,577,445 and 30,511,408 shares as of June 30, 2011,
and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; authorized: 5,000,000 shares;
designated: 5,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock;
no shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss (net of tax) |
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
288,936 |
|
|
|
286,148 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(6,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
287,645 |
|
|
|
278,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
526,099 |
|
|
$ |
535,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
1
The Dolan Company
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
$ |
48,416 |
|
|
$ |
56,454 |
|
|
$ |
100,372 |
|
|
$ |
112,480 |
|
Business Information |
|
|
21,023 |
|
|
|
22,755 |
|
|
|
41,615 |
|
|
|
43,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
69,439 |
|
|
|
79,209 |
|
|
|
141,987 |
|
|
|
156,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating: Professional Services |
|
|
22,936 |
|
|
|
23,861 |
|
|
|
46,438 |
|
|
|
46,051 |
|
Direct operating: Business Information |
|
|
8,373 |
|
|
|
7,624 |
|
|
|
16,711 |
|
|
|
14,540 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
26,828 |
|
|
|
25,639 |
|
|
|
54,602 |
|
|
|
50,827 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
7,966 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
64,299 |
|
|
|
63,820 |
|
|
|
130,370 |
|
|
|
124,843 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
|
16,473 |
|
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
33,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
(2,973 |
) |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
Non-cash interest income related to
interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
Other income |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
(2,293 |
) |
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
15,161 |
|
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
(5,673 |
) |
|
|
(4,079 |
) |
|
|
(11,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
6,434 |
|
|
|
19,508 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
The Dolan Company |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
$ |
17,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
The Dolan Company |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Decrease in redeemable
noncontrolling interest in NDeX |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan
Company common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,107,025 |
|
|
|
30,136,567 |
|
|
|
30,117,924 |
|
|
|
30,121,831 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,210,792 |
|
|
|
30,240,004 |
|
|
|
30,252,095 |
|
|
|
30,217,885 |
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
2
The Dolan Company
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
(Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit) |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
30,326,437 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
287,210 |
|
|
$ |
(38,377 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
248,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
The Dolan Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,355 |
|
Decrease in redeemable noncontrolling
interest in NDeX, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan
Company common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,572 |
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,274 |
|
Issuance of common stock pursuant
to the exercise of stock options |
|
|
13,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Share-based compensation expense,
including issuance of restricted
stock (shares are net of forfeitures) |
|
|
171,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
Increase in redeemable noncontrolling
interest in DiscoverReady, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,560 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
30,511,408 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
286,148 |
|
|
$ |
(6,022 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,298 |
) |
|
$ |
278,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
The Dolan Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
Decrease in redeemable noncontrolling
interest in NDeX , net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan
Company common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,569 |
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap,
net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,521 |
|
Share-based compensation expense,
including issuance of restricted
stock (shares are net of forfeitures) |
|
|
203,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,033 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(137,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
Increase in redeemable noncontrolling
interest in DiscoverReady, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
30,577,445 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
288,936 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
(1,346 |
) |
|
$ |
287,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
3
The Dolan Company
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,434 |
|
|
$ |
19,508 |
|
Distributions received from The Detroit Legal News
Publishing, LLC |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Distributions paid to holders of noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
Gain on sale of investment |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
8,882 |
|
|
|
7,966 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
5,459 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
(2,512 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,033 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in value of interest rate swap |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(665 |
) |
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Non-cash fair value adjustment on earnouts recorded in connection with acquisitions |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
business combinations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled pass-through costs |
|
|
(4,850 |
) |
|
|
(2,033 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(5,255 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
Deferred revenue and other liabilities |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
13,816 |
|
|
|
31,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments |
|
|
(5,071 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(3,911 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
Escrow payment received on sale of investment |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,588 |
) |
|
|
(3,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments on senior revolving note |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Payments on senior long-term debt |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
(6,225 |
) |
Payments on unsecured notes payable |
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
|
|
(9,576 |
) |
Payments for repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Other |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(6,785 |
) |
|
|
(23,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
|
|
4,048 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
4,862 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
|
$ |
6,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
4
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation: The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, which
has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements of The Dolan Company (the Company) have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial
information and the instructions to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation
S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to these rules and regulations. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 11, 2011, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC).
In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys interim
financial results. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of
operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full calendar
year.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its majority ownership interests in
American Processing Company, LLC d/b/a NDeX (NDeX), DiscoverReady LLC (DiscoverReady) and
Legislative Information Services of America (LISA). The Company accounts for the percentage
interests in NDeX, DiscoverReady and LISA that it does not own as noncontrolling interest.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
When the Company refers to Albertelli sellers in these notes, it means James E. Albertelli,
P.A., The Albertelli Firm, P.C., Albertelli Title, Inc. and James E. Albertelli, as a group.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In June 2011, the Federal Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
amended its accounting guidance to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive
income (OCI). The guidance requires the presentation of the components of net income, the
components of OCI and total OCI either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or
in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning
with its December 31, 2012 financial statements. The Company plans to elect presentation of a
single continuous statement.
Note 2. Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
Basic per share amounts are computed, generally, by dividing net income attributable to The
Dolan Company by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. The Company has employed
the two-class method to calculate earnings per share, as it relates to the redeemable
noncontrolling interest in NDeX, based on net income attributable to its common stockholders. At
June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and
outstanding. Diluted per share amounts assume the conversion, exercise, or issuance of all
potential common stock instruments (see Note 13 for information on stock options and restricted
stock) unless their effect is anti-dilutive, thereby reducing the loss per share or increasing the
income per share.
5
The following table computes basic and diluted net income attributable to The Dolan Company
per share (in thousands except for per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
$ |
17,789 |
|
Decrease in redeemable noncontrolling interest in
NDeX, net of tax |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company
common stockholders |
|
$ |
4,130 |
|
|
$ |
9,805 |
|
|
$ |
8,569 |
|
|
$ |
18,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
30,509 |
|
|
|
30,431 |
|
|
|
30,482 |
|
|
|
30,377 |
|
Weighted average common shares of unvested
restricted stock |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net
income per share |
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
30,137 |
|
|
|
30,118 |
|
|
|
30,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company
common stockholders per share basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net
income per share |
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
30,137 |
|
|
|
30,118 |
|
|
|
30,122 |
|
Stock options and restricted stock |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of dilutive net
income per share |
|
|
30,211 |
|
|
|
30,240 |
|
|
|
30,252 |
|
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company
common stockholders per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, options to purchase approximately
1.8 million weighted shares of common stock were excluded from the computation because their effect
would have been anti-dilutive. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, options to
purchase approximately 1.6 million weighted shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded
from the computation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 3. Business Combinations
Management is responsible for determining the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed represent managements estimate of fair values. Management determines valuations through a
combination of methods, which include internal rate of return calculations, discounted cash flow
models, outside valuations and appraisals and market conditions. The results of the business
combinations are included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations from the
respective transaction dates forward.
2011 Equity Transaction:
Acquisition of Noncontrolling Interest in DiscoverReady: In May 2011, the Company purchased
approximately one-third of the outstanding membership units of DiscoverReady held by its minority
partner, DR Holdco LLC, for approximately $5.0 million in cash. The Company accounted for this
acquisition as an equity transaction by reducing redeemable noncontrolling interest on the
Companys balance sheet by $5.0 million. No deal costs were incurred on this transaction. As a
result of this transaction, the Companys ownership percentage in DiscoverReady increased from
85.3% to 90.0%, and the noncontrolling interest decreased from 14.7% to 10.0%.
In connection with this purchase, the terms of the DiscoverReady limited liability company
agreement were amended. Under the terms of the amended agreement, DR Holdco has the right, for a
period of 90 days following November 2, 2012, to require DiscoverReady to repurchase approximately
50% of DR Holdcos equity interest in DiscoverReady, and for a period of 90 days following November
2, 2013, to require DiscoverReady to purchase DR Holdcos remaining equity interest in
DiscoverReady. In addition, for a period of 90 days following November 2, 2013, DiscoverReady also
has the right to require DR Holdco to sell its entire equity interest in DiscoverReady. In each
case, if either party timely exercises its right, DiscoverReady would pay DR Holdco an amount based
on the fair market value of the equity interest. These rights may be exercised earlier under
certain circumstances.
6
2010 Acquisition:
Acquisition of DataStream Content Solutions, LLC: On December 1, 2010, the Company acquired
DataStream Content Solutions, LLC (DataStream). In connection with this acquisition, the Company
paid the sellers $15.0 million in cash at closing, held back $1.5 million payable 18 months after
closing to secure indemnification claims, and is obligated to pay up to an additional $4.0 million
in earnouts in two annual installments. The amount of the two annual earnout payments is based
upon the acquired business achieving certain EBITDA targets during the years ended December 31,
2011, and 2012. These assets are part of the Companys Business Information segment. The Company
paid approximately $0.3 million in deal costs associated with this transaction.
Management estimated the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and was
assisted by a business valuation done by an independent third-party valuation firm. The total fair
value of $19.8 million was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis (income approach) using
a discount rate of 16.0% and a compound annual growth rate through 2030 of 6.1%. The Company
finalized its estimation of fair value in the first quarter of 2011. The fair value of assets
acquired was estimated as follows: $0.2 million to fixed assets; $0.4 million to various working
capital items; $5.6 million to various technology, including both existing technology and
technology in process, to be amortized over five to 15 years; $8.0 million to customer
relationships (preliminary allocation at December 31, 2010, was $9.2 million), to be amortized over
12 years; $0.2 million to a license agreement, to be amortized over six months; $1.7 million to
trademarks (preliminary allocation at December 31, 2010, was $1.6 million); and $3.6 million to
goodwill (preliminary allocation at December 31, 2010, was $2.6 million). The trademarks were
determined to have an indefinite life and therefore will not be amortized, but rather will be
reviewed annually for impairment. The December 31, 2010, balance sheet and statement of operations
were not retroactively adjusted for this measurement period adjustment as the amount of the change
was not significant to the 2010 financial statements.
In connection with this acquisition, the Company determined that the earnouts of $4.0 million,
in the aggregate, were likely to be achieved and therefore included the present value of these
payments, or $3.2 million, in its determination of consideration transferred. The Company has
determined that this liability is a Level 3 fair value measurement within the FASBs fair value
hierarchy, and such liability is adjusted to fair value at each reporting date, with the adjustment
reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses. See Note 5 for information pertaining to
changes in the fair value of this liability during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
The Company paid a premium over the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible
assets acquired in the acquisition (i.e., goodwill) because the Company anticipates revenue
synergies and operational efficiencies through combined general and administrative and corporate
functions. Such goodwill is deductible for tax purposes, and has been allocated to the Business
Information segment.
Pro Forma Information: Actual results of operations reflecting the equity interests acquired
in 2011 and 2010 and assets acquired in 2010 are included in the unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements from the dates of the applicable business combination. The unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations of the Company, set forth below, gives
effect to the Companys 2011 acquisition of noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady and its 2010
acquisitions of noncontrolling interest in NDeX, as well as its acquisitions of DataStream and
Federal News Service, using the purchase method as if they occurred on January 1, 2010. These
amounts are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations for future years
or actual results that would have been realized had the business combinations occurred as of the
beginning of each such year (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
69,439 |
|
|
$ |
81,841 |
|
|
$ |
141,987 |
|
|
$ |
161,227 |
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
17,251 |
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company per
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual/Pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
30,137 |
|
|
|
30,118 |
|
|
|
30,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,211 |
|
|
|
30,240 |
|
|
|
30,252 |
|
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Note 4. Derivative Instruments
The Company has entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage the risk associated
with a portion of its floating-rate long-term debt. The Company does not utilize derivative
instruments for speculative purposes. The interest rate swap involves the exchange of fixed-rate
and variable-rate payments without the exchange of the underlying notional amount on which the
interest payments are calculated. The notional amount of the swap agreement is $50 million through
December 30, 2012, $35 million from December 31, 2012, through December 30, 2013, and $25 million
from December 31, 2013, through June 30, 2014. The Company has designated this swap as a cash flow
hedge and has determined that it qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. Changes in fair value of
the cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive loss (net of tax) until income or loss from
the cash flows of the hedged item is realized. In addition to this swap, the Company held a swap
agreement with a notional amount of $25 million, which matured on March 31, 2011. This swap was
not designated for hedge accounting treatment and therefore any changes in the fair value were
recorded through the statement of operations.
As of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, the Company had $1.3 million in other
comprehensive loss related to unrealized losses (net of tax) on the cash flow hedge for both
periods. Unrealized gains and losses are reflected in net income attributable to The Dolan Company
when the related cash flows or hedged transactions occur and offset the related performance of the
hedged item.
This cash flow hedge was highly effective for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and is
expected to remain highly effective in future periods. The occurrence of these related cash flows
and hedged transaction remains probable.
The Company had liabilities of $2.2 million and $2.4 million resulting from interest rate
swaps at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively, which are included in accrued
liabilities or other liabilities on the balance sheet, depending on the time of the expiration of
the swap agreement. Total floating-rate borrowings not offset by the swap agreements at June 30,
2011, totaled $80.2 million.
By their nature, derivative instruments are subject to market risk. Derivative instruments are
also subject to credit risk associated with counterparties to the derivative contracts. Credit risk
associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparty with
a contract in a gain position to the Company fail to perform under the terms of the contract. The
Company does not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparty.
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company classifies the inputs
used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or
no market activity. These fair values are determined using pricing models for which the
assumptions utilize managements estimates or market participant assumptions. |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. The fair value hierarchy
requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances where inputs used to
measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value
measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair
value measurement in its entirety. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular
item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration
of inputs specific to the asset or liability.
The fair value of interest rate swaps are determined by the counterparty based on interest
rate changes. Interest rate swaps are valued based on observable interest rate yield curves for
similar instruments. The fair value of the earnout liability recorded in connection with the NDeX
Florida operations acquired from the Albertelli sellers and the earnout liability recorded in
connection with the DataStream acquisition are determined by management based on projected
financial performance and an estimated discount rate. The fair value of the redeemable
noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady is determined by management using a market approach.
8
The following table summarizes the balances of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in connection with the NDeX
Florida operations
acquired from the
Albertelli sellers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,447 |
|
|
|
5,447 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in connection with the
DataStream acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,014 |
|
|
|
9,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
$ |
17,613 |
|
|
$ |
19,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the balances of liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in connection with the NDeX
Florida operations
acquired from the
Albertelli sellers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
|
|
5,069 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in connection with the
DataStream acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,652 |
|
|
|
13,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
21,892 |
|
|
$ |
24,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value for all liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Minority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
Distributions to |
|
|
Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
The Dolan |
|
|
Share of |
|
|
Minority Partners / |
|
|
and Deferred |
|
|
Balance at June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Company |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Redemptions |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
2011 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in
connection with the
NDeX
Florida operations
acquired
from the Albertelli
sellers |
|
$ |
5,258 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,447 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in
connection with the
DataStream Acquisition |
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling
interest in
DiscoverReady |
|
|
14,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(5,208 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
9,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,730 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
(5,208 |
) |
|
$ |
(247 |
) |
|
$ |
17,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value for all liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Minority |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Attributable to |
|
|
Partners |
|
|
Distributions to |
|
|
Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
The Dolan |
|
|
Share of |
|
|
Minority Partners / |
|
|
and Deferred |
|
|
Balance at June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Company |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Redemptions |
|
|
Taxes |
|
|
2011 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in
connection with the
NDeX
Florida operations
acquired
from the Albertelli
sellers |
|
$ |
5,069 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,447 |
|
Earnout liability recorded in
connection with the
DataStream acquisition |
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
Redeemable noncontrolling
interest in
DiscoverReady |
|
|
13,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(5,208 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
9,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,892 |
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
(5,208 |
) |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
17,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2011, the Company repurchased approximately one-third of the outstanding
membership units in DiscoveryReady from DR Holdco (see Note 3 for more information on this
transaction). The Company paid approximately $5.0 million for the membership units in
DiscoverReady, which is included in Distributions to Minority Partners/Redemptions in the tables
above, along with $0.2 million in distributions to minority partners.
Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis. Certain
assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and are subject to fair
value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment). No such
fair value adjustments were required during the quarter.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short-term
nature of these instruments. The carrying value of the Companys debt is the remaining amount due
to its debtors under borrowing arrangements. To estimate the fair value of its variable-rate debt
issues that are not quoted on an exchange, the Company estimates an interest rate it would be
required to pay if it had to refinance its debt. The Company noted no significant changes in
interest rates between December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2011, and as such, the carrying value of
variable-rate debt under the Companys senior credit facility of $130.2 million approximates its
estimated fair value.
Note 6. Investments
Investments consisted of the following at June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
Equity |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
$ |
12,271 |
|
|
$ |
13,154 |
|
Other |
|
Equity |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,898 |
|
|
$ |
13,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 , the equity (loss) in earnings of affiliates is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC: The Company owns a 35% membership interest in
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC, or (DLNP). DLNP publishes ten legal newspapers, along
with one quarterly magazine, all located in southern Michigan. The Company accounts for this
investment using the equity method. Under DLNPs membership operating agreement, the Company
receives quarterly distributions based on its ownership percentage.
The difference between the Companys carrying value and its 35% share of the members equity
of DLNP relates principally to an underlying customer list at DLNP that is being amortized over its
estimated economic life through 2015.
10
The following tables summarize certain key information relating to the Companys investment in
DLNP as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, and for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Carrying value of investment |
|
$ |
12,271 |
|
|
$ |
13,154 |
|
Underlying finite-lived customer list, net of
amortization |
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
7,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Equity in earnings of DLNP, net of amortization
of customer list |
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
Distributions received |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
Note 7. Intangible Assets
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets: Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trade names
and goodwill. The Company has determined that these assets have an indefinite life and therefore
will not be amortized. The Company reviews indefinite-lived intangible assets annually on November
30 for impairment or whenever an indicator is identified which suggests an impairment may be
present.
The following table represents the balances of indefinite-lived intangible assets by segment
as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Default Processing Services |
|
$ |
131,709 |
|
|
$ |
131,709 |
|
Litigation Support Services |
|
|
23,651 |
|
|
|
23,651 |
|
Business Information |
|
|
62,844 |
|
|
|
61,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
|
218,204 |
|
|
|
217,193 |
|
Tradenames |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Default Processing Services |
|
|
6,537 |
|
|
|
6,537 |
|
Business Information |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tradenames |
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
|
8,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indefinite-lived intangible assets |
|
$ |
226,418 |
|
|
$ |
225,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in goodwill and tradenames in the Business Information segment resulted from
the Companys finalization in the first quarter of 2011 of its estimate of fair value of the
December 2010 Datastream acquisition.
Finite-Life Intangible Assets: Total amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets
for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $4.4 million and $4.0
million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $8.9
million and $8.0 million, respectively.
Note 8. Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligation
A summary of long-term debt is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Senior secured debt (see below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior variable-rate term note, payable in
quarterly installments with a balloon |
|
$ |
47,500 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Senior variable-rate revolving note |
|
|
82,700 |
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior secured debt |
|
|
130,200 |
|
|
|
134,000 |
|
Unsecured notes payable |
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
4,886 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,044 |
|
|
|
139,146 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
8,992 |
|
|
|
7,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
125,052 |
|
|
$ |
131,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Senior Secured Debt: As of June 30, 2011, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries
have a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks for a $205.0 million senior secured credit
facility comprised of a term loan facility in an initial aggregate amount of $50.0 million due and
payable in quarterly installments with a final maturity date of December 6, 2015, and a revolving
credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $155.0 million, which may be increased pursuant to
an accordion feature to up to $200.0 million, with a final maturity date of December 6, 2015.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had net unused available capacity of approximately $72.3 million
on its revolving credit facility, after taking into account the senior leverage ratio requirements
under the credit facility. The Company expects to use the remaining availability under this credit
facility, if needed, for working capital, potential acquisitions, stock buy-backs and other general
corporate purposes.
Note 9. Common Stock
In December 2010, the Companys board of directors approved a stock buy-back plan. This plan
allows the Company to repurchase up to 2 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock at
prevailing market prices or negotiated prices at any time through December 31, 2013. The number of
shares and the timing of the purchases will be determined at the discretion of management. During
the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company repurchased 137,500 shares under this plan at an
average price of $12.27 per share, for a total of $1.7 million, all of which were repurchased in
the first quarter.
Note 10. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was $4.1
million and $11.7 million, respectively, or 38.8% and 37.4% of income before income taxes. The
provision for income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is comprised of
federal, state and local income taxes. The primary difference between the Companys effective tax
rate and the statutory federal rate is state income taxes. This difference is partially offset by
earnings of the Companys noncontrolling interests, which are not subject to federal income tax
payable by the Company.
Note 11. Major Customers and Related Parties
NDeX has eight law firm customers and, of those customers, Trott & Trott and the Barrett law
firm (both related parties) comprised 11.5% and 20.5%, respectively, of the Companys total
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 12.3% and 22.4%, respectively, of the
Companys total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
NDeX has entered into long-term services agreements with its law firm customers, including
Trott & Trott and the Barrett law firm, that provide for the exclusive referral of mortgage default
and other files for processing, and provide for the possibility of annual increases in the fixed
fee per file that NDeX charges its law firm customers.
Note 12. Reportable Segments
The Company has two operating divisions: Professional Services and Business Information. Its
Professional Services Division, which provides professional services supporting primarily attorneys
and/or their clients, comprises two reporting segments: Mortgage Default Processing Services and
Litigation Support Services. The Mortgage Default Processing Services segment generates revenue
from NDeX, which provides mortgage default processing and related services to its customers. The
Litigation Support Services segment generates revenue by providing discovery management and
document review services through DiscoverReady and appellate services through Counsel Press, LLC.
Both of these operating segments generate revenues through fee-based arrangements. The
Business Information segment provides products, data and certain services through
subscription-based products and a variety of media, including court and commercial newspapers,
weekly business journals and the Internet. The Business Information segment generates revenues
primarily from display and classified advertising (including events), public notices, and
subscriptions and other. The Company determined its reportable segments based on the types of
products sold and services performed.
12
The tables below reflect summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable segments
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default |
|
|
Litigation |
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing |
|
|
Support |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
32,689 |
|
|
$ |
15,727 |
|
|
$ |
21,023 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
69,439 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
16,584 |
|
|
|
6,352 |
|
|
|
8,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,309 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
10,594 |
|
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
26,828 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
6,162 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,110 |
|
|
$ |
3,733 |
|
|
$ |
2,099 |
|
|
$ |
(2,361 |
) |
|
$ |
5,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
39,706 |
|
|
$ |
16,748 |
|
|
$ |
22,755 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,209 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
16,830 |
|
|
|
7,031 |
|
|
|
7,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,485 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
9,514 |
|
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
9,398 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
25,639 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,927 |
|
|
$ |
4,439 |
|
|
$ |
5,586 |
|
|
$ |
(2,479 |
) |
|
$ |
16,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Default |
|
|
Litigation |
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing |
|
|
Support |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
70,544 |
|
|
$ |
29,828 |
|
|
$ |
41,615 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
141,987 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
34,260 |
|
|
|
12,178 |
|
|
|
16,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,149 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
20,924 |
|
|
|
9,642 |
|
|
|
19,737 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
54,602 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
6,944 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
12,619 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
8,416 |
|
|
$ |
6,067 |
|
|
$ |
2,962 |
|
|
$ |
(4,639 |
) |
|
$ |
12,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
82,141 |
|
|
$ |
30,339 |
|
|
$ |
43,707 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
156,187 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
33,805 |
|
|
|
12,246 |
|
|
|
14,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,591 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
19,803 |
|
|
|
8,419 |
|
|
|
18,254 |
|
|
|
4,351 |
|
|
|
50,827 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
13,425 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
19,656 |
|
|
$ |
7,991 |
|
|
$ |
10,906 |
|
|
$ |
(4,697 |
) |
|
$ |
33,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13. Share-Based Compensation
Total share-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was
approximately $1.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, before income taxes. Total share-based
compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $2.0
million and $1.4 million, respectively, before income taxes.
The Company has reserved 4.8 million shares of its common stock for issuance under its
incentive compensative plan of which there were 1.7 million shares available for issuance as of
June 30, 2011.
Stock Options: Share-based compensation expense related to stock options for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively,
before income taxes and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $1.2
million and $0.9 million, respectively, before income taxes.
The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate
the fair value of stock options granted in 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
47 50 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
1.8 2.1 |
% |
Expected term of options |
|
4.25 5.5 |
years |
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
4.36 5.15 |
|
13
The following table represents stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
Outstanding options at December 31,
2010 |
|
|
1,945,770 |
|
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
13.50 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
Granted |
|
|
453,885 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(55,384 |
) |
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
13.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,344,271 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
|
$ |
12.91 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,140,691 |
|
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
$ |
13.59 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2011, the aggregate intrinsic value of both options outstanding and options
exercisable was approximately $0.5 million. At June 30, 2011, there was approximately $4.4 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.
Restricted Stock Grants: Share-based compensation expense related to grants of restricted
stock for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, was approximately $0.5 million and $0.3
million, respectively, before income taxes and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010,
was approximately $0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively, before income taxes.
The following table represents a summary of nonvested restricted stock activity for the six
months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
324,906 |
|
|
$ |
12.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
212,437 |
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(95,250 |
) |
|
|
12.44 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(8,900 |
) |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, June 30, 2011 |
|
|
433,193 |
|
|
$ |
11.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrecognized compensation expense for unvested restricted shares of common stock as of
June 30, 2011, was approximately $4.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.1 years.
Note 14. Contingencies and Commitments
Litigation: From time to time, the Company is subject to certain claims and lawsuits that
have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Although the outcome of such existing matters
cannot presently be determined, it is managements opinion that the ultimate resolution of such
existing matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or
financial position.
14
Note 15. Subsequent Events
On July 25, 2011, the Company, through DiscoverReady, completed the acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of ACT Litigation Services, Inc. (ACT) for (i) an upfront payment
of approximately $60.0 million in cash that was paid in full at closing, plus (ii) up to $5.0
million in potential additional purchase price that will be held back by the Company for a period
of 20 months (subject to partial early release) to secure certain obligations of ACT and its
shareholders, plus (iii) an earnout payment based primarily upon the extent to which an agreed-upon
multiple of ACTs pro forma EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2011, exceeds the base purchase
price of $65.0 million, plus (iv) two additional earnout payments of up to a maximum of $15.0
million in the aggregate that are contingent upon reaching certain revenue milestones for the years
ended December 31, 2012, and 2013. All of the earnout payments are subject to certain set-off
rights of the Company under the purchase agreement.
Due to the timing of the acquisition, the Company has not yet completed, and therefore it is
not practical to include, its estimate of the fair value of the assets acquired, liabilities
assumed or contingent consideration. Accordingly, it is also not practical to include proforma
financial statements. The acquired assets will become part of the Companys Litigation Support
Services segment within its Professional Services Division. Goodwill, while not yet estimated, will
be fully deductible for tax purposes, and will be allocated to the DiscoverReady reporting unit as
part of the Litigation Support Services segment. Deal costs associated with this acquisition are
expected to be approximately $0.5 million.
ACT specializes in providing technology and process solutions to clients with electronic
discovery needs, and also provides hosting and review services. The Company completed this
acquisition because it is a strategic fit with DiscoverReady. ACT generated revenues of $19.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2010, and on a trailing 12 month basis for the 12 months
ended June 30, 2011, has generated $30.5 million in revenues.
The Company borrowed $60.0 million under its revolving credit facility to fund the closing
payments in connection with this acquisition and, after giving effect to this borrowing, has $142.0
million outstanding on its revolving credit facility.
15
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
We recommend that you read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and the related notes included in
this report.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms we,
us, and our refer to The Dolan Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. When we refer to
National Default Exchange or NDeX in this report, we mean all of our mortgage default
processing operations in Michigan, Indiana and Minnesota and at Barrett-NDEx (collectively referred
to as the existing NDeX business), as well as the Florida mortgage default and related title
operations acquired from the Albertelli sellers in October 2009. When we refer to Barrett-NDEx
in this report, it means the entities that constitute the mortgage default processing operations
serving the Texas, California and Georgia markets that NDeX acquired on September 2, 2008. The term
Barrett law firm refers to Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP and its two law firm
affiliates. When we refer to the Albertelli sellers in this report, it means James E. Albertelli,
P.A., The Albertelli Firm, P.C., Albertelli Title, Inc. and James E. Albertelli, as a group. We
also refer to James E. Albertelli, P.A. and The Albertelli Firm, P.C., together, as the Albertelli
law firm. The term Trott sellers in this report means David A. Trott, Ellen Coon, Trustee of the
Ellen Coon Living Trust u/a/d 9/9/98, Marcy J. Ford, Trustee of the Marcy Ford Revocable Trust
u/a/d 7/12/04, William D. Meagher, Trustee of the William D. Meagher Trust u/a/d 8/24/07, and
Jeanne M. Kivi, Trustee of the Jeanne M. Kivi Trust u/a/d 8/24/07, as a group.
Forward-Looking Statements
This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933.
Forward-looking statements are statements such as those contained in projections, plans,
objectives, estimates, statements of future performance, and assumptions relating to any of the
foregoing and can often be identified by the use of words such as may, will, expect,
anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, goal, continue, and similar words or
expressions. By their nature, forward-looking statements are based on information currently
available to us and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our
actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed
in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors
include:
|
|
|
our businesses operate in highly competitive markets and depend on the economies and
demographics of the legal, financial and real estate markets we serve, and changes in those
sectors could have an adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows, and profitability; |
|
|
|
if the number of case files referred to us by our mortgage default processing service
law firm customers (or loan servicers and mortgage lenders we serve directly for mortgage
default files in California) decreases or fails to increase, our operating results and
ability to execute our growth strategy could be adversely affected; |
|
|
|
bills introduced and laws enacted to mitigate foreclosures, voluntary relief programs
and voluntary halts or moratoria by servicers or lenders, as well as governmental
investigations, enforcement actions, litigation and court orders, may have an adverse
affect on our mortgage default processing services and public notice operations; |
|
|
|
growing our business may place a strain on our management and internal systems,
processes and controls, may result in operating inefficiencies, and may negatively impact
our operating margins; |
|
|
|
we intend to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities, which we may not do
successfully and which may subject us to considerable business and financial risk or
require us to raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
we depend on our senior management team and other key leaders of our business segments,
and the operation and growth of our business may be negatively impacted if we lose any of
their services; |
|
|
|
revenues of our subsidiary NDeX and our subsidiary DiscoverReady are each very
concentrated among a few customers, thus the loss of business from these customers and a
failure to attract new customers could adversely affect our operating results; and |
|
|
|
certain key personnel of our subsidiary NDeX, who are also shareholders and principal
attorneys of our law firm customers, may under certain circumstances have interests that
differ from or conflict with our interests. |
See Risk Factors in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, filed on March 11, 2011, with the SEC for a description of these and other risks,
uncertainties and factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or
opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any forward-looking
statements. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as
otherwise required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events,
changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this report.
16
Overview
We are a leading provider of necessary professional services and business information to
legal, financial and real estate sectors in the United States. We serve our customers through two
complementary operating divisions: our Professional Services Division and our Business Information
Division. Our Professional Services Division comprises two reporting segments: mortgage default
processing services and litigation support services. Through our subsidiary, NDeX, we provide
mortgage default processing services to eight law firm customers located in Florida, Georgia,
Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, and Texas, as well as directly to mortgage lenders and loan servicers
on residential real estate located in California. Our subsidiaries DiscoverReady and Counsel Press
comprise our litigation support services reporting segment. DiscoverReady provides outsourced
discovery management and document review services to major United States companies and their
counsel. Counsel Press provides appellate services to law firms and attorneys nationwide. Our
Business Information Division publishes business journals, court and commercial media and other
highly focused information products and services, operates web sites and produces events for
targeted professional audiences in 21 geographic markets across the United States. Our information
is delivered through a variety of methods, including more than 60 print publications and more than
80 web sites. Through subscription-based offerings, our Business Information Division also offers
transcription services and access to our legislative databases which provide federal and state
legislative and regulatory information.
Our total revenues decreased $9.8 million, or 12.3%, from $79.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010, to $69.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily as a
result of a $7.0 million decrease in our mortgage default processing services revenues, a $1.7
million decrease in our Business Information Division revenues and a $1.0 million decrease in
our litigation support services revenues. The decrease in mortgage default processing services
revenues was driven primarily by a decrease in the number of foreclosure files received for
processing and change in the mix of types of files, as discussed below. Net income attributable to
The Dolan Company decreased to $2.6 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $8.6 million for
the same period in 2010.
Recent Developments
Acquisition of ACT Litigation Services, Inc.
On July 25, 2011, we, through DiscoverReady, completed the acquisition of substantially all of
the assets of ACT Litigation Services, Inc. (ACT) for (i) an upfront payment of approximately
$60.0 million in cash that was paid in full at closing, plus (ii) up to $5.0 million in potential
additional purchase price that will be held back for a period of 20 months (subject to partial
early release) to secure certain obligations of ACT and its shareholders, plus (iii) an earnout
payment based primarily upon the extent to which an agreed-upon multiple of ACTs pro forma EBITDA
for the year ended December 31, 2011, exceeds the base purchase price of $65.0 million, plus (iv)
two additional earnout payments of up to a maximum of $15.0 million in the aggregate that are
contingent upon reaching certain revenue milestones for the years ended December 31, 2012, and
2013. All of the earnout payments are subject to certain set-off rights under the purchase
agreement.
The Company used funds available under its revolving line of credit to fund the closing
payments in connection with this acquisition. The acquired operations of ACT will become part of
the Companys Litigation Support Services segment within its Professional Services Division.
ACT specializes in providing technology and process solutions to clients with electronic
discovery needs. It also provides hosting and review services.
Increase in our ownership in DiscoverReady
In May 2011, we purchased approximately one-third of the outstanding membership units in
DiscoverReady held by DR Holdco for approximately $5.0 million in cash. As a result, our ownership
percentage in DiscoverReady increased from 85.3% to 90.0%, and the noncontrolling interest
decreased from 14.7% to 10.0%.
Stock Buy-Back Plan
Our board of directors approved a stock buy-back plan effective as of the closing of our new
credit agreement on December 6, 2010. This plan allows us to repurchase up to 2 million shares of
issued and outstanding common stock at prevailing market prices or negotiated prices through
December 31, 2013. The number of shares and the timing of the purchases will be determined at the
discretion of management. During the first six months of 2011, we repurchased 137,500 shares under
this plan for an aggregate of $1.7 million, all of which were purchased in the first quarter.
17
Regulatory Environment
There are two general areas of regulatory activity, federal and state. In the federal sector,
in April 2011, 14 major mortgage servicers signed consent orders with the Board of Governors of The
Federal Reserve System and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), agreeing to submit
action plans detailing how they will comply with new requirements for servicing defaulted loans.
The consent agreements required improvements to certain internal processes and enhanced
controls related to third-party vendors that provide services related to residential default or
foreclosure, including the law firm customers of NDeX. The consent agreements required the
servicers to complete revisions in foreclosure processing by approximately June 15, 2011, to the
satisfaction of the Federal Reserve and the OCC, and to reorganize their related foreclosure
operations to follow the amended procedures by approximately August 15, 2011. In June the OCC gave
the banks 30-day extensions on these deadlines. The OCC is now reviewing the plans the banks
submitted. The OCC has indicated that it may require changes to the plans provided and that it is
in discussions with the United States Department of Justice and other federal and state authorities
to finalize and synchronize the plans into a consistent set of servicing requirements. In June
2011, the OCC issued guidance clarifying that, in addition to the 14 large mortgage servicers
subject to the agencys enforcement action, all mortgage servicers under OCC supervision must
assure compliance with all appropriate foreclosure management standards. The bulletin also
directed all national banks to conduct a self-assessment of foreclosure management practices no
later than September 30, 2011, and to correct any weaknesses identified. National bank examiners
will review the self-assessments and corrective actions in the next quarterly review or examination
of the bank.
The OCC deadlines for reports and compliance have continued the heightened governmental
scrutiny that residential mortgage foreclosure servicers have been experiencing for the past
several quarters, since the robo-signing issues hit the media. Servicers have reacted to this
heightened scrutiny by reviewing and verifying their policies and procedures, applying more
scrutiny to pending foreclosures, and then releasing into foreclosure only those cases that have
been carefully reviewed. Many servicers have also reacted to this environment of increased scrutiny
by requesting additional information and process verification from law firms and other third-party
vendors. These servicer actions have sharply reduced, though not completely stopped, the number of
mortgage defaults being referred to begin foreclosure. We continue to believe that the reduction in
foreclosure referrals is likely to continue until the new procedures are in place, but that a large
number of pre-foreclosures and pending foreclosures remain to be undertaken and completed.
In July 2011, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau outlined its approach to supervising
large depository institutions to ensure compliance with federal consumer protection laws. This
supervisory process, which applies to the 111 depository institutions with total assets of more
than $10 billion, began on July 21, 2011.
Meanwhile, at the state level, the attorneys general of all 50 states announced late in 2010 a
joint effort to investigate the mortgage servicing industry and to negotiate with mortgage
servicers in hopes of achieving changes in the foreclosure process as well as possible payment of
financial penalties and an increased level of mortgage loan modifications. While these officials
in most states lack direct regulatory authority over mortgage servicers, the attorneys general have
indicated a willingness to act in the courts if necessary to enforce their negotiating positions.
Their discussions with the mortgage servicers have not resulted in agreements and based on public
statements, the efforts do not appear to be coordinated or moving toward common ground. Meanwhile
approximately a dozen of the attorneys general have withdrawn from these negotiations and have
expressed their support for the federal regulatory steps described above.
For additional information about legislation and regulatory activity impacting or potentially
impacting our business, please see Item 7: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsRecent DevelopmentsRegulatory Environment in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2011, as
well as the Regulatory Environment discussions in our prior reports filed with the SEC on Form
10-Q and Form 10-K.
Recent Acquisitions
We have grown significantly since our predecessor company commenced operations in 1992, in
large part due to acquisitions, such as the ACT acquisition discussed in Recent Developments
above and the following two acquisitions that occurred in 2010:
DataStream Content Solutions, LLC: On December 1, 2010, we acquired DataStream Content
Solutions, LLC (DataStream). In connection with this acquisition, we paid the sellers $15.0
million in cash at closing, held back $1.5 million payable 18 months after closing to secure
indemnification claims, and are obligated to pay up to an additional $4.0 million in earnouts in
two annual installments. The amount of the two annual earnout payments is based upon the acquired
business achieving certain EBITDA targets during the calendar years ending December 31, 2011, and
2012.
Federal News Service, Inc.: On August 9, 2010, we acquired certain assets of Federal News
Service, Inc. (Federal News) for approximately $1.7 million in cash.
18
Revenues
We derive revenues from two operating divisions, our Professional Services Division and our
Business Information Division, operating as three reportable segments: (1) mortgage default
processing services; (2) litigation support services; and (3) business information. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011, our total revenues were $69.4 million and $142.0 million,
respectively, and the percentage of our total revenues attributed to each of our divisions and
segments was as follows:
|
|
|
70% and 71%, respectively, from our Professional Services Division (47% and 50%,
respectively, from mortgage default processing services and 23% and 21%, respectively, from
litigation support services); and |
|
|
|
30% and 29%, respectively, from our Business Information Division. |
Professional Services. Our Professional Services Division generates revenues primarily by
providing mortgage default processing, outsourced discovery management and document review, and
appellate services through fee-based arrangements. We further break down our Professional Services
Division into two reportable segments, mortgage default processing services and litigation support
services.
Mortgage Default Processing Services. Through NDeX, we assist eight law firms in processing
foreclosure, bankruptcy, eviction and, to a lesser extent, other mortgage default case files for
residential mortgages that are in default. We also provide foreclosure processing services directly
to mortgage lenders and loan servicers for properties located in California. In addition, NDeX
provides loan modification and loss mitigation support on mortgage default files to its customers
and related real estate title work primarily to the Barrett and Albertelli law firms. We refer to
revenues that NDeX derives from these sources collectively as mortgage default processing service
revenues. Shareholders and/or principal attorneys of our law firm customers, including David A.
Trott, chairman and chief executive officer of NDeX, are executive management employees of NDeX.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we received for processing approximately
80,800 and 173,100 mortgage default case files, respectively. The mix of types of files received
for processing changed as more fully described below in Professional Services Division Results,
resulting in a shift from higher revenue files to lower revenue files. Our mortgage default
processing service revenues accounted for 47% and 50%, respectively, of our total revenues and 68%
and 70%, respectively, of our Professional Services Division revenues during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, each of the Barrett Law Firm,
Trott & Trott and Albertelli law firm accounted for more than 10% of our mortgage default
processing services revenues, with the Barrett Law Firm accounting for 45%, Trott & Trott
accounting for 25%, and Albertelli law firm accounting for 13% of these revenues. We recognize
mortgage default processing service revenues on a proportional basis over the period during which
the services are provided, the calculation of which requires management to make estimates. For more
information regarding how we recognize revenue, please see Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Revenue Recognition in Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2011.
NDeXs revenues are primarily driven by the number of residential mortgage defaults in each of
the states in which we do business, as well as the type of files we process (e.g., foreclosures,
evictions, bankruptcies or litigation) because each has a different pricing structure. Although the
services agreements with our law firm customers contemplate the review and possible revision of the
fees for the services we provide, price increases have not historically affected our mortgage
default processing revenues materially. In some cases, our services agreements adjust the fee paid
to us for the files we process on an annual basis pursuant to an agreed-upon consumer price index.
In other cases, our services agreements require us to agree with our law firm customer regarding
the terms and amount of any fee increase. If we are unable to negotiate fixed fee increases under
these agreements that at least take into account the increases in costs associated with providing
mortgage default processing services, our operating and net margins could be adversely affected.
You should refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsRevenues in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed
with the SEC on March 11, 2011, for more information about the conditions when the fixed fee per
file we charge our law firm customers may change.
Deferred revenue includes payments for mortgage default processing services billed in advance
that we expect to recognize in future periods due to the extended period of time it takes to
process certain files. At June 30, 2011, we had such deferred revenue on our balance sheet in the
amount of $13.7 million.
Litigation Support Services. Our litigation support services segment generates revenues by
providing discovery management and document review services through DiscoverReady and appellate
services through Counsel Press. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our litigation
support services revenues accounted for 23% and 21%, respectively, of our total revenues and 32%
and 30%, respectively, of our Professional Services Division revenues. We recognize litigation
support services revenues during the month in which the services are provided. In the case of
Counsel Press, this is when our final appellate product is filed with the court.
DiscoverReady provides its services to major United States companies and their counsel and
assists them in document reviews and helping them manage the discovery process. Discovery is the
process by which parties use the legal system to obtain relevant information, primarily in
litigation and regulatory matters. This process can be expensive and time-consuming for companies
depending upon the volume of emails, electronic files and paper documents a company must review to
respond to a document request. DiscoverReady also provides related technology management services.
DiscoverReady bills its customers primarily based upon the number of documents reviewed and the
amount of data or other information it processes in connection with those reviews. Accordingly, our
discovery management and document review services revenues are largely determined by the volume of
data we review.
19
Counsel Press assists law firms and attorneys throughout the United States in organizing,
preparing and filing appellate briefs, records and appendices, in paper and electronic formats that
comply with the applicable rules of the U.S. Supreme Court, any of the 13 federal courts of appeals
and any state appellate court or appellate division. Counsel Press charges its customers primarily
on a per-page basis based on the final appellate product that is filed with the court clerk.
Accordingly, our appellate service revenues are largely determined by the volume of appellate cases
we handle and the number of pages in the appellate cases we file.
Business Information. Our Business Information Division generates revenues primarily from
display and classified advertising, public notice and subscriptions. We sell commercial advertising
consisting of display and classified advertising in all of our print products and on most of our
web sites. We include within our display and classified advertising revenue those revenues
generated by sponsorships, advertising and ticket sales generated by our local events. Our display
and classified advertising revenues accounted for 10% and 9%, respectively, of our total revenues
and 33% and 31%, respectively, of our Business Information Division revenues for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011. We recognize display and classified advertising revenues upon
publication of an advertisement in one of our publications or on one of our web sites. Advertising
revenues are driven primarily by the volume, price and mix of advertisements published as well as
how many local events are held.
We publish more than 300 different types of public notices in our court and commercial
newspapers, including foreclosure notices, probate notices, notices of fictitious business names,
limited liability company and other business entity notices, unclaimed property notices, notices of
governmental hearings and trustee sale notices. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
our public notice revenues accounted for 40% and 41%, respectively, of our Business Information
Division revenues and 12% of our total revenues for both periods. We recognize public notice
revenues upon placement of a public notice in one of our court and commercial newspapers. Public
notice revenues are driven by the volume and mix of public notices published, which can be affected
by the number of residential mortgage foreclosures in the markets where we are qualified to publish
public notices and the rules governing publication of public notices in such states. In many of the
states in which we publish public notices, the price for public notices is statutorily regulated,
with market forces determining the pricing for the remaining states.
We sell our business information products, including our DataStream and Federal News products,
primarily through subscriptions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our subscription
and other revenues, which consist primarily of subscriptions, single-copy sales, transcriptions and
access to state and federal legislative information, accounted for 27% and 28%, respectively, of
our Business Information Division revenues and 8% of our total revenues for both periods. We
recognize subscription revenues ratably over the subscription periods, which range from three
months to multiple years, with the average subscription period being twelve months. Deferred
revenue includes payment for subscriptions collected in advance that we expect to recognize in
future periods. At June 30, 2011, we had such deferred revenue on our balance sheet in the amount
of $7.8 million. Subscription and other revenues are driven primarily by the number of copies sold
and the subscription rates charged to customers.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of compensation and
employee benefits for the processing staff at NDeX, DiscoverReady, and Counsel Press and our
editorial personnel in our Business Information Division, production and distribution
expenses, such as compensation (including stock-based compensation expense) and employee
benefits for personnel involved in the production and distribution of our business
information products, the cost of newsprint and delivery of our business information
products, and file-specific data services and technology fees in connection with our
California foreclosure files; |
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of
compensation (including stock-based compensation expense) and employee benefits for our
sales, human resources, accounting and information technology personnel, publishers and
other members of management, rent, other sales and marketing related expenses and other
office-related payments; |
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, which represents the cost of fixed assets and software allocated
over the estimated useful lives of these assets, with such useful lives ranging from two to
thirty years; and |
|
|
|
Amortization expense, which represents the cost of finite-life intangible assets acquired
through business combinations allocated over the estimated useful lives of these
intangibles, with such useful lives ranging from two to thirty years. |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues depends upon our mix of business from
Professional Services, which is our higher margin revenue, and Business Information. This mix may
continue to shift between fiscal periods.
20
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
We own 35.0% of the membership interests in DLNP, the publisher of The Detroit Legal News and
10 other publications. We account for our investment in DLNP using the equity method. For the three
months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, our share of DLNPs earnings was $0.5 million and $1.1
million, respectively. This is net of amortization of $0.4 million for each period. For the six
months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, our share of DLNPs earnings was $1.2 million and $2.5
million, respectively. This is net of amortization of $0.8 million for each period. NDeX handles
all public notices required to be published in connection with files it services for Trott & Trott
pursuant to our services agreement with Trott & Trott and places a significant amount of these
notices in The Detroit Legal News. Trott & Trott pays DLNP for these public notices. See Liquidity
and Capital Resources Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities below for information
regarding distributions paid to us by DLNP.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest
Redeemable noncontrolling interest at June 30, 2011, consisted of a 6.2% noncontrolling
interest in NDeX held by the sellers of Barrett-NDEx or their transferees (as a group), a 10.0%
noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady held by DR Holdco LLC and a 50% interest in Legislative
Services of America (LISA) held by Telran, Inc. During the second quarter of 2011, noncontrolling
interest in DiscoverReady decreased from 14.7% to 10.0% as a result of our acquisition of
approximately one-third of the membership units held by DR Holdco. See Recent
DevelopmentsIncrease in our Ownership in DiscoverReady above, for information regarding this
transaction.
Under the terms of the NDeX operating agreement, each month we are required to distribute
the excess of NDeXs earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization less debt service with
respect to any interest-bearing indebtedness of NDeX, capital expenditures and working capital
reserves to NDeXs members on the basis of common equity interest owned. We paid the following
distributions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Trott sellers |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
Feiwell & Hannoy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Sellers of Barrett-NDEx or
their transferees
(as a group) |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no similar distribution obligation under the DiscoverReady limited liability company
agreement; however, we are obligated to make quarterly distributions to pay tax liabilities to DR
Holdco, the minority member of DiscoverReady. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
we made distributions of $0.2 million.
The sellers of Barrett-NDEx, each as members of NDeX, have the right, for a period of six
months following September 2, 2012, to require NDeX to repurchase all or any portion of their
respective membership interest in NDeX. To the extent any minority member of NDeX timely exercises
this right, the purchase price of such membership interest will be based on 6.25 times NDeXs
trailing twelve month earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, less the
aggregate amount of any interest bearing indebtedness outstanding for NDeX as of the date the
repurchase occurs. The aggregate purchase price would be payable by NDeX in the form of a
three-year unsecured note bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 2.0%.
In connection with our purchase of approximately one-third of the outstanding membership units
of DiscoverReady held by DR Holdco discussed above, the terms of the DiscoverReady limited
liability company agreement were amended. Under the terms of the amended agreement, DR Holdco has
the right, for a period of 90 days following November 2, 2012, to require DiscoverReady to
repurchase approximately 50% of DR Holdcos equity interest in DiscoverReady, and for a period of
90 days following November 2, 2013, to require DiscoverReady to purchase DR Holdcos remaining
equity interest in DiscoverReady. In addition, for a period of 90 days following November 2, 2013,
DiscoverReady also have the right to require DR Holdco to sell its entire equity interest in
DiscoverReady. In each case, if either party timely exercises its right, we would pay DR Holdco an
amount based on the fair market value of the equity interest. These rights may be exercised earlier
under certain circumstances.
DiscoverReady may engage an independent third-party valuation firm to assist it in determining
the fair market value of the equity interest being repurchased by or sold to DiscoverReady if any
of the above-described rights are exercised. The purchase price for any equity interests
repurchased or sold pursuant to these rights, if exercised, will be paid in cash to the extent
allowed by the terms of our then-existing credit agreement, or pursuant to a three year unsecured
promissory note, bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 1.0%.
21
We are required to record the redeemable noncontrolling interests (NCI) in NDeX and
DiscoverReady to their redemption amounts at each reporting period. The NDeX NCI is adjusted to the
estimated redemption amount at each reporting period based on the formula as discussed above. The
DiscoverReady NCI is adjusted to fair value each period using a market approach. During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a reduction to the NCI for NDeX of $2.5 million
($1.6 million net of tax) and $4.1 million ($2.5 million net of tax), respectively, and the
adjustments recorded to the NCI for DiscoverReady were a reduction of $0.2 million ($0.2 million
net of tax) and an increase of $0.1 million ($0.1 million net of tax). Please see our unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of stockholders equity and comprehensive income, as well as Note
5 to our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, included in this report on
Form 10-Q for further information regarding accounting for noncontrolling interests and its
implications to our financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Please see Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements
included in this report on Form 10-Q as well as Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed
with the SEC on March 11, 2011. Further, we discuss our critical accounting estimates in Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There has been no significant
change in our critical accounting policies or critical accounting estimates since the end of 2010.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected operating results, including as a percentage of total
revenues, for the periods indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
$ |
48,416 |
|
|
|
69.7 |
% |
|
$ |
56,454 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
21,023 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
22,755 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
69,439 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
79,209 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
|
42,573 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
% |
|
|
43,090 |
|
|
|
54.4 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
19,335 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
18,251 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Unallocated corporate operating expenses |
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
64,299 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
% |
|
|
63,820 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
% |
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
16,473 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
Non-cash interest income related to interest
rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Other income, net |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
15,161 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(1,870 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
(5,673 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company per
share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in redeemable noncontrolling interest in NDeX |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company
common stockholders per share basic
and diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
$ |
100,372 |
|
|
|
70.7 |
% |
|
$ |
112,480 |
|
|
|
72.0 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
41,615 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
43,707 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
141,987 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
156,187 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
|
85,889 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
% |
|
|
84,835 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
39,842 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
35,311 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Unallocated corporate operating expenses |
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
130,370 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
% |
|
|
124,843 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
% |
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
12,806 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
33,856 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(2,973 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Non-cash interest income related to interest
rate swaps |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Other income, net |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,513 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(4,079 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
|
(11,663 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,434 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
19,508 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Less: Net income attributable to redeemable
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company |
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
$ |
17,789 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company per
share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in redeemable noncontrolling interest in NDeX |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to The Dolan Company
common stockholders per share basic
and diluted |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
30,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
30,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
23
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
69.4 |
|
|
$ |
79.2 |
|
|
$ |
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
)% |
Our total revenues decreased primarily as a result of a $7.0 million decrease in our
mortgage default processing services revenues. The decrease in mortgage default processing services
revenues was driven by a decrease in the number of files received for processing as well as a
change in the mix of the types of files received for processing. Our business information revenues
were down $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to decreased public
notice revenues, and our litigation support services revenues were down $1.0 million. You should
refer to the more detailed discussions in Professional Services Division Results and Business
Information Division Results below for more information regarding the causes of these changes.
We derived 69.7% and 71.3% of our total revenues from our Professional Services Division and
30.3% and 28.7% of our total revenues from our Business Information Division for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. In our Professional Services Division, revenues from
our mortgage default processing services segment accounted for 67.5% and 70.3% of our total
division revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Revenues from
our litigation support services segment (also part of our Professional Services Division) accounted
for 32.5% and 29.7% of our total Professional Services Division revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
64.3 |
|
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(33.8 |
)% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased from 80.6% for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, to 92.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, largely as a
result of decreased revenues in our mortgage default processing services business and decreased
public notice revenues in our business information division.
Direct Operating Expenses. The decrease in direct operating expenses consisted of a $0.9
million decrease in our Professional Services Division offset by a $0.7 million increase in our
Business Information Division. You should refer to the more detailed discussions in Professional
Services Division Results and Business Information Division Results below for more information
regarding the causes of these changes. Direct operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues
increased to 45.1% for the second quarter of 2011, from 39.7% for the same period in 2010.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted primarily of a $1.3 million increase in our Professional Services
Division. You should refer to the more detailed discussions in Professional Services Division
Results and Business Information Division Results below for more information regarding the
causes of changes in our selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expense as a percentage of revenue increased to 38.6% for the three months ended
June 30, 2011, from 32.4% for the same period in 2010.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our depreciation expense decreased primarily as a
result of software in connection with the Barrett-NDeX acquisition, a large portion of which fully
depreciated in 2010. Our amortization expense increased primarily because of the intangible assets
associated with the DataStream acquisition.
24
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total interest expense, net |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
)% |
Interest on bank credit facility |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
Cash interest expense on interest rate swaps |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(49.1 |
)% |
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54.4 |
)% |
Interest expense related to our bank credit facility remained consistent for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, and June 30, 2010. Our average outstanding debt was $130.6 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $140.7 million for the same period one year ago,
but our average interest rate was 2.6% this year versus 2.2% last year.
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(63.6 |
)% |
Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased primarily as a result of a reduction in
earnings recorded from our 35% interest in DLNP. The reduced earnings are the result of a
reduction in public notice placements in their newspapers due to decreased foreclosure and workout
volumes in the markets it serves.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(67.0 |
)% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
40.5 |
% |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2011, and 2010,
was 40.5% and 37.4% of income before income taxes, respectively. The provision for income taxes
during interim quarterly reporting periods is based on our estimates of the effective tax rates for
the respective full fiscal year. The effective tax rate in any quarter can be affected positively
or negatively by adjustments that are required to be reported in a specific quarter. The increase
in our effective tax rate compared to the same quarter last year is primarily a function of lower
income in 2011 without a corresponding reduction in expenses that impact the tax rate.
Professional Services Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
48.4 |
|
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
|
$ |
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
)% |
Mortgage default processing services |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
)% |
Litigation support services revenues |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
)% |
Mortgage default processing services revenues decreased primarily due to decreased file
volumes in many of the markets we serve as well as a significant change in the mix of types of
files received for processing. While our total files received for processing for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, was down only 6.8%, from 86,600 mortgage default case files for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, to 80,800 mortgage default case files for the three months ended June
30, 2011, we experienced a change in the mix of the types of files. New foreclosure files, which
tend to require more processing from NDeX and are therefore higher revenue files, continued to be
down over 20% from 2010. This was offset by a greater number of lower revenue files, such as
foreclosure restarts, mediations, and transfer files. The increase in transfer files was in our
NDeX Florida operations, where files were moved by servicers after initiation of foreclosure
activities but before they were completed by other law firms. NDeX accepted the transfer work
because it believes the transfer work will lead to future volume growth from the transferring
clients. We believe these file volume decreases and mix changes
are attributed to continued marketplace and regulatory dynamics that began in 2010 that have
caused many large loan servicers to temporarily slow down and reduce the referral of defaulted
files for foreclosure processing while they review their processes and practices. While it is
difficult to predict when the number of foreclosure files received
for processing will increase, we do not expect a significant increase
in the remainder of 2011, but do expect higher levels in 2012.
25
The Barrett law firm, Albertelli law firm and Trott & Trott each accounted for more than 10%,
and together accounted for approximately 68% of our mortgage default processing services segment
and 46% of our Professional Services Division revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
In the three months ended June 30, 2010, The Barrett law firm and Trott & Trott each accounted for
more than 10%, and together accounted for approximately 69% of our mortgage default processing
services segment and 49% of our Professional Services Division revenues.
The slight decrease in litigation support services revenues resulted primarily from a decrease
from DiscoverReadys strong revenues recorded in the second quarter of 2010. We continue our
efforts to diversify our DiscoverReady customer base. In the second quarter of 2011,
DiscoverReadys top two customers (one of which was not a top two customer for the same period in
2010 or in the first quarter of this year) accounted for 57% of litigation support services
revenues, while in the second quarter of 2010, its top two customers accounted for 66% of such
revenues. In addition, revenue from DiscoverReadys customers excluding its historical top two
customers increased 80% in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010.
Operating ExpensesMortgage Default Processing Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(53.8 |
)% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Direct operating expenses decreased slightly as a result of decreased file volumes as
discussed above, but did not decrease in proportion to the volume decline. Even with the lower file
volumes, processing costs in some of our locations have increased as a result of increased demands,
additional tasks, time spent attending to servicer audits, and process changes required by the
clients of our law firm customers, requiring additional processing work for our employees. In
addition, selling, general and administrative expenses have increased largely as a result of new
client requirements placed on us, primarily in terms of increased requirements as it relates to
information security and technology. Also, increased personnel costs from growing volumes in
Florida, along with added headcount as we program our case management system to accommodate
Florida, California and Texas files, have contributed to the increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses. However, in light of reduced volumes, we have taken steps to reduce our
costs at NDeX and plan to continue to adjust staffing in a way that does not impair our ability to
deliver high-quality service to our law firm customers and their servicer clients.
Depreciation expense decreased primarily as a result of software associated with the
Barrett-NDeX acquisition, a large portion of which fully depreciated in 2010.
Total operating expenses attributable to our mortgage default processing services segment as a
percentage of segment revenues increased to 93.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from
77.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily a result of a reduction
in revenues.
Operating ExpensesLitigation Support Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
26
The decrease in direct expenses is due primarily to a decrease in contract labor costs,
due in part to more favorably negotiated service agreements with some of our providers. Selling,
general and administrative costs have increased primarily as a result of an
increase in personnel and facility costs as we continue to invest in and grow our
DiscoverReady business, offset somewhat by a decrease in marketing and promotion costs due to
re-branding efforts that occurred in the second quarter of 2010 and did not occur in the current
quarter, as well as more strategic management of investments made in trade shows in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
Total operating expenses attributable to our litigation support services segment as a
percentage of segment revenues increased to 76.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, from
73.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, which resulted from the increased costs at
DiscoverReady as discussed above.
Business Information Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total Business Information Revenues |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
)% |
Display and classified advertising revenues |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
Public notice revenues |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
)% |
Subscription-based and other revenues |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
% |
In the second quarter of 2011, we saw continued softness in public notice revenues as
lenders continued to place increased scrutiny on their foreclosure practices, delaying
foreclosure-related public notice placements in our publications. While it is difficult to predict
when the number of foreclosure-related public notice placements in our publications will increase,
we do not expect a significant increase in the remainder of 2011, but
do expect higher levels in 2012. Increased revenues from our 2010 acquisitions, which
accounts for the increase in subscription-based and other revenues, helped somewhat offset the
public notice revenue declines.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
Operating expenses increased primarily as a result of increased costs associated with
operating the businesses we acquired in 2010. Total operating expenses from the pre-existing
businesses were down $1.4 million year-over-year, largely as a result of cost savings initiatives
and other expense reductions put in place as a result of lower revenues, along with decreased
production costs resulting from fewer public notice placements in our publications. Because of the
softness in public notice revenues, we continue to make adjustments to operating expenses and
evaluate a number of additional cost savings initiatives.
Total operating expenses attributable to our Business Information Division as a percentage of
Business Information Division revenue increased to 92.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2011,
from 80.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, due to increases in expenses related to 2010
acquisitions and the reduced foreclosure activity resulting in the decrease of our public notice
revenues.
27
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
142.0 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Our total revenues decreased primarily as a result of an $11.6 million decrease in our
mortgage default processing services revenues. The decrease in mortgage default processing services
revenues was driven by a decrease in the number of files received for processing as well as a
change in the mix of the types of files received for processing. Our business information revenues
were down $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to decreased public
notice revenues, and our litigation support services revenues were down $0.5 million. You should
refer to the more detailed discussions in Professional Services Division Results and Business
Information Division Results below for more information regarding the causes of these changes.
We derived 70.7% and 72.0% of our total revenues from our Professional Services Division and
29.3% and 28.0% of our total revenues from our Business Information Division for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. In our Professional Services Division, revenues from
our mortgage default processing services segment accounted for 70.3% and 73.0% of our total
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Revenues from our
litigation support services segment (also part of our Professional Services Division) accounted for
29.7% and 27.0% of our total revenues for six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
130.4 |
|
|
$ |
124.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
)% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased from 79.9% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010, to 91.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, largely as a
result of decreased revenues in our mortgage default processing services business and decreased
public notice revenues in our business information division.
Direct Operating Expenses. The increase in direct operating expenses consisted of a $0.4
million increase in our Professional Services Division and a $2.2 million increase in our Business
Information Division. You should refer to the more detailed discussions in Professional Services
Division Results and Business Information Division Results below for more information regarding
the causes of these changes. Direct operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased
to 44.5% for the first six months of 2011, from 38.8% for the same period in 2010.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted of a $2.3 million increase in our Professional Services Division
and a $1.5 million increase in our Business Information Division. You should refer to the more
detailed discussions in Professional Services Division Results and Business Information Division
Results below for more information regarding the causes of changes in our selling, general and
administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of total
revenues increased to 38.5% for the first six months of 2011, from 32.5% for the same period in
2010.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our depreciation expense decreased primarily as a
result of software in connection with the Barrett-NDeX acquisition, a large portion of which fully
depreciated in 2010. Our amortization expense increased primarily because of the intangible assets
associated with the DataStream acquisition.
28
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total interest expense, net |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
(11.3 |
)% |
Interest on bank credit facility |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Cash interest expense on interest rate swaps |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(31.4 |
)% |
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33.8 |
)% |
Interest expense related to our bank credit facility remained consistent for the six
months ended June 30, 2011. Our average outstanding debt was $130.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, compared to $146.1 million for the same period one year ago, but our average
interest rate was 2.5% this year versus 2.2% last year. Cash interest incurred on our interest rate
swaps decreased primarily as a result of a decrease in the notional amount of our swaps, due to the
maturity on March 31, 2011, of a swap agreement with a notional amount of $25 million, and, to a
lesser extent, interest rate changes.
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(52.7 |
)% |
Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased primarily as a result of a reduction in
earnings recorded from our 35% interest in DLNP. The reduced earnings are the result of a
reduction in public notice placements in their newspapers due to decreased foreclosure and workout
volumes in the markets it serves.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(65.0 |
)% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
38.8 |
% |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010 was
38.8% and 37.4% of income before income taxes, respectively. The provision for income taxes during
interim quarterly reporting periods is based on our estimates of the effective tax rates for the
respective full fiscal year. The increase in our effective tax rate compared to the same quarter
last year is primarily a function of lower income in 2011 without a corresponding reduction in
expenses that impact the tax rate.
Professional Services Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
100.4 |
|
|
$ |
112.5 |
|
|
$ |
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
)% |
Mortgage default processing revenues |
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
)% |
Litigation support services revenues |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
Our revenues decreased primarily as a result of decreased revenues in our mortgage
default processing services segment. Revenues in this segment decreased primarily due to decreased
file volumes in many of the markets we serve as well as a significant change in the mix of types of
files received for processing. While our total files received for processing for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, was down only 5.1%, from 182,300 mortgage default case files for the six
months ended June 30, 2010, to 173,100 mortgage default case files for the six months ended June
30, 2011, we experienced a change in the mix of the types of files. New foreclosure files, which
tend to require more processing from NDeX and are therefore higher revenue files, were down over
20% from 2010. This was offset by a greater number of lower revenue files, such as foreclosure
restarts, mediations, and transfer files. The
increase in transfer files was in our NDeX Florida operations as discussed in the three month
section above. We believe these file volume decreases and mix changes are attributed to continued
marketplace and regulatory dynamics that began in 2010 that have caused many large loan servicers
to temporarily slow down and reduce the referral of defaulted files for foreclosure processing
while they review their processes and practices. While it is
difficult to predict when the number of foreclosure files received
for processing will increase, we do not expect a significant increase
in the remainder of 2011, but do expect higher levels in 2012.
29
The Barrett law firm, Albertelli law firm and Trott & Trott each accounted for more than 10%,
and together accounted for approximately 70% of our mortgage default processing services segment
and 49% of our Professional Services Division revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
In the six months ended June 30, 2010, The Barrett law firm and Trott & Trott each accounted for
more than 10%, and together accounted for approximately 71% of our mortgage default processing
services segment and 52% of our Professional Services Division revenues.
The slight decrease in litigation support services revenues resulted primarily from a decrease
in DiscoverReadys revenues. We continue our efforts to diversify our DiscoverReady customer base.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, DiscoverReadys top two customers (one of which was not a
top two customer in the first six months of 2010) accounted for 50% of litigation support services
revenues, while in the same period in 2010, its top two customers accounted for 64% of such
revenues. In addition, revenue from DiscoverReadys customers excluding its historical top two
customers more than doubled in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010.
Operating ExpensesMortgage Default Processing Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
62.1 |
|
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(50.2 |
)% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
Total operating expenses decreased slightly due to a decrease in depreciation expense as
a result of software associated with the Barrett-NDeX acquisition, a large portion of which fully
depreciated in 2010. Direct expenses increased in spite of decreased file volumes. Even with the
lower file volumes, processing costs in some of our locations have increased as a result of
increased demands, additional tasks, time spent attending to servicer audits, and process changes
required by the customers of our law firm customers, requiring additional processing work for our
employees. In addition, selling, general and administrative expenses have increased largely as a
result of new client requirements placed on us, primarily in terms of increased requirements as it
relates to information security and technology. Also, increased personnel costs due to growing
volumes in Florida, along with added headcount as we program our case management system to
accommodate Florida, California and Texas files, have contributed to the increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses. However, in light of reduced volumes, we have taken steps to
reduce our costs at NDeX and plan to continue to adjust staffing in a way that does not impair our
ability deliver high-quality service to our law firm customers and their servicer clients.
Total operating expenses attributable to our mortgage default processing services segment as a
percentage of segment revenues increased to 88.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from
76.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was primarily a result of a reduction
in revenues.
Operating ExpensesLitigation Support Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
22.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Direct expenses are relatively flat year-over-year. Selling, general and administrative
expenses have increased primarily as a result of an increase in personnel and facility costs as we
continue to invest in and grow our DiscoverReady business, offset somewhat by a decrease in
marketing and promotion costs due to re-branding efforts that occurred in the first six months of
2010 and did not occur in
the current year, as well as more strategic management of investments made in trade shows thus
far in 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.
30
Total operating expenses attributable to our litigation support services segment as a
percentage of segment revenues increased to 79.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from
73.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which resulted from the increased costs at
DiscoverReady as discussed above.
Business Information Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total Business Information Division Revenues |
|
$ |
41.6 |
|
|
$ |
43.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
)% |
Display and classified advertising revenues |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Public notice revenues |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(28.1 |
)% |
Subscription-based and other revenues |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
% |
In the first six months of 2011, we experienced softness in public notice revenues as
lenders continued to place increased scrutiny on their foreclosure practices, delaying
foreclosure-related public notice placements in our publications. While it is difficult to predict
when the number of foreclosure-related public notice placements in our publications will increase,
we do not expect a significant increase in the remainder of 2011, but
do expect higher levels in 2012. Increased revenues from our 2010 acquisitions, which are
included in subscription-based and other revenues, helped somewhat offset the public notice revenue
declines.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
% |
Operating expenses increased primarily as a result of increased costs associated with
operating the businesses we acquired in 2010. Total operating expenses from the pre-existing
businesses were down $1.3 million year-over-year, largely as a result of cost savings initiatives
and other expense reductions put in place as a result of lower revenues, along with decreased
production costs resulting from fewer public notice placements in our publications. Because of the
softness in the public notice revenues, we continue to make adjustments to operating expenses and
evaluate a number of additional cost savings initiatives.
Total operating expenses attributable to our Business Information Division as a percentage of
Business Information Division revenue increased to 95.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011,
from 80.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, due to increases in expenses related to
acquisitions and the reduced foreclosure activity reflected in the decrease of our public notice
revenues.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off balance sheet arrangements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, available capacity under our
credit facility, distributions received from DLNP, and available cash reserves. The following table
summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, working capital and long-term debt, less current portion
as of June 30, 2011, and December 31, 2010, as well as cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2011, and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
|
$ |
4,862 |
|
Working Capital |
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
125,052 |
|
|
|
131,568 |
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
13,816 |
|
|
$ |
31,370 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments |
|
|
(5,071 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(3,911 |
) |
|
|
(3,326 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(6,785 |
) |
|
|
(23,881 |
) |
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
The most significant inflows of cash are cash receipts from our customers. Operating cash
outflows include payments to employees, payments to vendors for services and supplies and payments
of interest and income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011, decreased
$17.6 million, or 56.0%, to $13.8 million from $31.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010. This decrease was largely attributable to the decrease in net income when compared to the
first six months in 2010, as well as a decrease in distributions received from DLNP as discussed
below. At the same time, our total receivables increased as a result of slower collections in some
of our NDeX operating units as discussed below.
Working capital increased from $2.2 million to $5.6 million primarily as a result of a
decrease in pass-through liabilities on our balance sheet.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts, allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of
gross receivables, and
days sales outstanding (DSO), as of June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010, is set forth in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands) |
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of
gross accounts receivable |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Days sales outstanding |
|
|
91.3 |
|
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
Our allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable was
relatively flat for each period shown.
We calculate DSO by dividing net receivables by average daily revenue excluding circulation.
Average daily revenue is computed by dividing total revenue for the quarter by the total number of
days in the quarter. Our DSO increased as a result of carrying larger receivable balances in some
of our NDeX operating units as a result of an increase in the length of time it takes to process
foreclosures, most notably in Florida as this is a judicial state with longer foreclosure
processing cycles. Please refer to Recent Developments Regulatory Environment above for an
explanation of some of the current factors that are contributing to the increase in time it is
taking to process foreclosures. In addition, our DSO increased from December 31, 2010, somewhat as
a result of early payments we received from two of NDeXs law firm customers at the end of 2010,
resulting in a lower year-end balance and thus a reduced DSO. Similar prepayments were not made at
the end of June 30, 2011, or 2010.
At June 30, 2011, we had a significant concentration of credit risk relating to amounts due
from NDeXs eight law firm customers. Of our total consolidated net receivable balance, $38.7
million, or 58.2%, is related to amounts due from these customers, and includes both billed and
unbilled amounts. Billed amounts represent $31.1 million, or 46.8%, of our total consolidated net
receivable balance. We do not carry an allowance for doubtful accounts as it relates to these law
firm customers as we have not experienced any write-offs with these customers in the past, and do
not anticipate any such write-offs in the future. Additionally, we have deferred revenue related to
these customers, for amounts billed but not yet earned, in the amount of $13.7 million, which
represents 35.4% of the total balances due.
We own 35.0% of the membership interests in The Detroit Legal Publishing, LLC, or DLNP, the
publisher of The Detroit Legal News, and received distributions of $2.1 million and $3.5 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively. This
decrease in distributions received was due to decreased earnings generated by DLNP as a result
of a reduction in public notice placements in their newspapers as discussed above. The operating
agreement for DLNP provides for us to receive quarterly distribution payments based on our
ownership percentage, which are a significant source of operating cash flow.
32
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $5.1 million to $8.6 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2011, from $3.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. This
increase was primarily a result of cash paid in connection with the buy-out of approximately
one-third of the outstanding membership units in DiscoverReady held by DR Holdco. Our capital
spending was $0.6 million higher in the first six months of 2011 as compared to 2010. About 65% of
our capital spending during the six months ended June 30, 2011, was attributable to specific
technology projects, including internally developed software projects and a server infrastructure
improvement project. We expect the costs for capital expenditures to range between 2.5% and 3.5% of
our total revenues, on an aggregated basis, for the year ending December 31, 2011.
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities primarily includes borrowings under our revolving credit
agreement and the issuance of long-term debt. Cash used in financing activities generally includes
the repayment of borrowings under the revolving credit agreement and long-term debt, payments on
unsecured notes, payments to repurchase our common stock and the payment of fees associated with
the issuance of long-term debt.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $17.1 million to $6.8 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2011, from $23.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. In
accordance with the terms of unsecured notes payable in connection with the increases in our
ownership in NDeX, we made payments of $1.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to $9.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Total payments on our bank
credit facility were $10.4 million lower in the first six months of 2011 as compared to 2010.
Long-term debt, less current portion, decreased $6.5 million, or 5.0%, to $125.1 million as of June
30, 2011, from $131.6 million as of December 31, 2010. Additionally, in the first six months of
2011, we used $1.7 million to repurchase shares of our common stock.
Credit Agreement. On December 6, 2010, we entered into a third amended and restated credit
agreement, effective December 6, 2010 (the New Credit Agreement), with a syndicate of bank
lenders for a $205.0 million senior secured credit facility comprised of a term loan facility in an
initial aggregate amount of $50.0 million due and payable in quarterly installments with a final
maturity date of December 6, 2015, and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to
$155.0 million, which may be increased pursuant to an accordion feature to up to $200.0 million,
with a final maturity date of December 6, 2015. At any time after December 6, 2012, if the
outstanding principal balance of revolving loans under the revolving credit facility of the New
Credit Agreement exceeds $50.0 million, $50.0 million of such revolving loans shall convert to an
amortizing term loan due and payable in quarterly installments with a final maturity date of
December 6, 2015. The New Credit Agreement restated our previous credit agreement in its
entirety.
At June 30, 2011, we had $47.5 million outstanding under our term loan, and $82.7 million
outstanding under our revolving line of credit and available capacity of approximately $72.3
million, after taking into account the senior leverage ratio requirements under the credit
agreement. On July 25, 2011, we drew down $60.0 million from our revolving credit facility pursuant
to the terms of the New Credit Agreement to fund closing payments in connection with the
acquisition of ACT. These borrowings will initially bear interest at a weighted average rate of
2.7%. After giving effect to this borrowing, we had an additional $12.4 million available for
borrowing under the New Credit Agreement. We expect to use the remaining availability under our
credit agreement, if at all, for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including
the financing of acquisitions.
At June 30, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on our senior term note was 2.8%. If we
elect to have interest accrue (1) based on the prime rate, then such interest is due and payable on
the last day of each month and (2) based on LIBOR, then such interest is due and payable at the end
of the applicable interest period that we elect, provided that if the applicable interest period is
longer than three months interest will be due and payable in three month intervals. At June 30,
2011, all of the interest on our senior note was based on LIBOR.
Future Needs
We expect that cash flow from operations, supplemented by short and long-term financing and
the proceeds from our credit facility, as necessary, will be adequate to fund day-to-day operations
and capital expenditure requirements, along with the earnout and holdback due to the Albertelli
Sellers, and our payment obligations to the Trott Sellers in connection with our purchase of their
ownership interest in NDeX and to Feiwell & Hannoy in connection with the exercise of its put
right. However, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow in the future could be adversely
impacted by regulatory, lender and other responses to the mortgage foreclosure crisis, including
new and proposed legislation and lenders voluntary and required loss mitigation efforts and
moratoria, including those described in Recent DevelopmentsRegulatory Environment earlier in
this quarterly report.
33
A decision to repurchase shares of our common stock as permitted under our stock repurchase
program may impact our cash needs in the future. This program was approved by our board of
directors in December 2010, permitting us to repurchase up to 2 million shares of our common stock
at any time through December 31, 2013, and in the first half of 2011 we repurchased 137,500 shares
under this program for an aggregate of $1.7 million, all of which were purchased in the first
quarter. See Recent Developments Stock Buy-Back Plan earlier in this quarterly report on Form
10-Q for a discussion of this plan.
We plan to continue to develop and evaluate potential acquisitions to expand our product and
service offerings and customer base and enter new geographic markets. We intend to fund these
acquisitions over the next twelve months with funds generated from operations and borrowings under
our credit facility. We may also need to raise money to fund these acquisitions, as we did for the
acquisition of Barrett-NDEx in 2008, through the sale of our equity securities or additional debt
financing, including takedowns under our $200 million shelf registration statement declared
effective by the SEC on January 27, 2010.
Our ability to secure short-term and long-term financing in the future will depend on several
factors, including our future profitability and cash flow from operations, the quality of our short
and long-term assets, our relative levels of debt and equity, the financial condition and
operations of acquisition targets (in the case of acquisition financing) and the overall condition
of the credit markets.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risks related to interest rates. Other types of market risk, such as
foreign currency risk, do not arise in the normal course of our business activities. Our exposure
to changes in interest rates is limited to borrowings under our credit facility. However, as of
June 30, 2011, we had a swap arrangement that converts $50 million of our variable rate term loan
into a fixed rate obligation. The aggregate notional amount of this $50 million swap agreement will
mature on various dates through June 30, 2014. In addition to this swap, we held a swap agreement
with a notional amount of $25 million, which matured on March 31, 2011. We enter into derivative
financial instrument transactions, such as swaps or interest rate caps, in order to manage or
reduce our exposure to risk from changes in interest rates. We do not enter into derivatives or
other financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes.
We recognize all of our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value. We record the fair value of our swap agreements in
accrued liabilities or other liabilities on our balance sheet, depending on the timing of the
expiration of the swap agreement. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument, like our interest rate swap agreements, depends on whether it has been designated and
qualifies for hedge accounting. As of June 30, 2011, we have designated our interest rate swap
agreement that terminates on June 30, 2014, for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, we record
changes in the fair value of this swap agreement in other comprehensive income or loss (net of tax)
on our balance sheet for the period then ended. Conversely, we treated the fair value of the swap
agreement that terminated on March 31, 2011, and did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, as
a component of interest income (expense) in our statement of operations for the period then ended.
During the first quarter of 2011, we recognized interest income of $0.3 million related to the
fair value of the interest rate swap agreement that did not qualify for hedge accounting and
terminated on March 31, 2011. We did not hold any interest rates swap agreements that did not
qualify for hedge accounting during the three months ended June 30, 2011. At both June 30, 2011,
and 2010, we have $1.3 million (net of tax) included in other comprehensive loss related to the
fair value of the interest rate swap agreement that terminates on June 30, 2014, and qualifies for
hedge accounting. At June 30, 2011, and 2010, the estimated fair value of our fixed interest rate
swaps was a liability of $2.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively.
If the future interest yield curve decreases, the fair value of our interest rate swap
agreements will decrease and interest expense will increase. If the future interest yield curve
increases, the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements will increase and interest expense
will decrease.
Based on the variable-rate debt included in our debt portfolio, a 75 basis point increase in
interest rates would have resulted in additional interest expense of $0.2 million (pre-tax) and
$0.3 million (pre-tax) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in
the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported accurately and within the time frames specified in the SECs rules and forms and
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
34
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June
30, 2011, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are from time to time involved in ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our normal
course of business, and we do not believe that any such existing litigation is material to our
financial condition or results of operations.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors we previously disclosed in Part
IItem 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010,
filed with the SEC on March 11, 2011.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
In December 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program that
allows us to purchase up to 2 million shares of our common stock at market prices at the discretion
of management at any time through December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2011, 1,862,500 shares remained
available under the program. No repurchases were made during the second quarter of 2011.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated July 25,
2011, among The Dolan Company, DiscoverReady
LLC, ACT Litigation Services, Inc. and the
Persons listed on Annex A (excluding
schedules and exhibits, which the Company
agrees to furnish supplementally to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request)
|
|
Incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 2.1 of our
current report on
Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on July 25,
2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Third Amended and
Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
of DiscoverReady LLC, dated as of May 11,
2011.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of our
current report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Interactive Data File
|
|
Filed herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
THE DOLAN COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James P. Dolan
James P. Dolan
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 2, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Vicki J. Duncomb
Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
36
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Interactive Data File
|
|
Filed herewith. |
37