e424b3
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration File No. 333-167579
PROSPECTUS
(Proposed Holding Company for
Standard Bank, PaSB)
Up to 3,450,000 Shares of
Common Stock
Standard Financial Corp., a Maryland corporation, is offering
shares of common stock for sale in connection with the
conversion of Standard Mutual Holding Company from the mutual to
the stock form of organization. We expect that our common stock
will be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under
the symbol STND upon conclusion of the stock
offering.
We are offering up to 3,450,000 shares of common stock for
sale on a best efforts basis. We may sell up to
3,967,500 shares of common stock because of demand for the
shares in excess of 3,450,000 shares or changes in market
conditions that would increase our pro forma market value
in excess of $34.5 million (3,450,000 shares
multiplied by the $10.00 purchase price per share) without
resoliciting subscribers. We must sell a minimum of
2,550,000 shares in order to complete the offering.
We are offering the shares of common stock in a
subscription offering to eligible depositors of
Standard Bank, PaSB (Standard Bank or the
Bank). Shares of common stock not purchased in the
subscription offering may be offered for sale to the general
public in a community offering. We also may offer
for sale shares of common stock not purchased in the
subscription offering or community offering through a
syndicated community offering managed by Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (Stifel
Nicolaus). In addition, Standard Financial Corp. intends
to establish a charitable foundation in connection with the
conversion and contribute to it $200,000 in cash and a number of
shares of common stock with a value equal to 3.5% of the shares
sold in the offering.
The minimum number of shares of common stock you may order is
25 shares. The maximum number of shares of common stock
that can be ordered by any person in the offering is
20,000 shares, and no person, together with an associate or
group of persons acting in concert, may purchase more than
30,000 shares in the offering. The offering is expected to
expire at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 17,
2010. We may extend this expiration date without notice to you
until November 1, 2010. The Pennsylvania Department of
Banking and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
may approve a later date which may not conclude beyond
September 23, 2012. Once submitted, orders are irrevocable
unless the offering is terminated or is extended beyond
November 1, 2010, or the number of shares of common stock
to be sold is increased to more than 3,967,500 shares or
decreased to fewer than 2,550,000 shares. If the offering
is extended beyond November 1, 2010, we will resolicit
subscribers. You will have the opportunity to maintain, change
or cancel your order within a specified period. If you do not
respond during that period, your stock order will be cancelled,
deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be cancelled or
payment will be returned promptly with interest calculated at
our statement savings rate. If the number of shares of common
stock to be sold is increased to more than 3,967,500 shares
or decreased to fewer than 2,550,000 shares, we will cancel
subscribers orders, promptly return all funds with
interest, cancel deposit account withdrawal authorizations and
establish a new offering range. Subscribers will be given an
opportunity to place a new stock order. Funds received during
the offering will be held in a segregated account at Standard
Bank and will earn interest calculated at Standard Banks
statement savings rate, which is currently 0.15% per annum.
Stifel Nicolaus will assist us in selling our shares of common
stock on a best efforts basis. Stifel Nicolaus is not required
to purchase any shares of the common stock that are being
offered for sale.
This investment involves a degree of risk, including the
possible loss of your investment.
Please read Risk Factors beginning on
page 17.
OFFERING SUMMARY
Price: $10.00 per
Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Midpoint
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Adjusted Maximum
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
2,550,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
|
3,967,500
|
|
Gross offering proceeds
|
|
$
|
25,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
34,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
39,675,000
|
|
Estimated offering expenses (excluding selling agent fees and
expenses)
|
|
$
|
948,500
|
|
|
$
|
948,500
|
|
|
$
|
948,500
|
|
|
$
|
948,500
|
|
Estimated selling agent fees and expenses(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
407,886
|
|
|
$
|
449,160
|
|
|
$
|
490,434
|
|
|
$
|
537,899
|
|
Estimated net proceeds
|
|
$
|
24,143,614
|
|
|
$
|
28,602,340
|
|
|
$
|
33,061,066
|
|
|
$
|
38,188,601
|
|
Estimated net proceeds per share
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
$
|
9.58
|
|
|
$
|
9.63
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes: (i) selling
commissions payable by us to Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated in connection with the subscription and
community offerings equal to 1.0% of the aggregate amount of
common stock sold in the subscription and community offerings
(net of insider purchases and shares purchased by our ESOP), or
approximately $347,900, at the adjusted maximum of the offering
range; and (ii) other expenses of the offering payable to
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated as selling
agent estimated to be $75,000. For information regarding
compensation to be received by Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated and the other broker-dealers that may
participate in the syndicated community offering, including the
assumptions regarding the number of shares that may be sold in
the subscription and community offerings and the syndicated
community offering to determine the estimated offering expenses,
see Pro Forma Data on page 44 and The
Conversion Marketing and Distribution;
Compensation on page 127.
|
|
(2)
|
|
If all shares of common stock are
sold in the syndicated community offering, the maximum selling
agent commissions and expenses would be $1.3 million at the
minimum, $1.5 million at the midpoint, $1.7 million at
the maximum, and $2.0 million at the maximum, as adjusted.
|
These securities are not deposits or accounts and are not
insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or any other government agency.
None of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System, nor any state securities regulator
has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if
this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offense.
For assistance, please call the
Stock Information Center, toll free, at (877)
821-5778.
The date of this prospectus is
August 12, 2010.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
i
SUMMARY
The following summary highlights material information in this prospectus. It may not contain
all the information that is important to you. For additional information, you should read this
entire prospectus carefully, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In this prospectus, the terms we, our, and us refer to Standard Financial Corp. and
Standard Bank unless the context indicates another meaning.
Standard Bank
Standard Bank is a Pennsylvania chartered savings bank headquartered in Murrysville,
Pennsylvania. Standard Bank was organized in 1913, and reorganized into the mutual holding company
structure in 1998. Standard Bank is currently the wholly owned subsidiary of Standard Mutual
Holding Company, a Pennsylvania mutual holding company. On a consolidated basis, as of March 31,
2010, Standard Mutual Holding Company had total assets of $403.2 million, total loans of $277.1
million, total deposits of $311.2 million and equity of $43.6 million. We provide financial
services to individuals, families and businesses through our ten banking offices located in the
Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany County, Maryland.
Standard Banks business consists primarily of accepting deposits from the general public and
investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations and borrowings, in
commercial real estate loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and
lines of credit, commercial business loans and investment securities. To a much lesser extent, we
also originate construction loans and consumer loans. Standard Bank offers a variety of deposit
accounts, including savings accounts, certificates of deposit, money market accounts, commercial
and regular checking accounts and individual retirement accounts.
Standard Banks executive offices are located at 2640 Monroeville Boulevard, Monroeville,
Pennsylvania 15146. Our telephone number at this address is (412) 856-0363. Our website address
is www.standardbankpa.com. Information on our website is not incorporated into this
prospectus and should not be considered part of this prospectus.
Standard Financial Corp.
Standard Financial Corp. is a newly formed Maryland corporation that will own all of the
outstanding shares of common stock of Standard Bank upon completion of the mutual-to-stock
conversion and the offering. Other than matters of an organizational nature, Standard Financial
Corp. has not engaged in any business to date.
Our executive offices are located at 2640 Monroeville Boulevard, Monroeville, Pennsylvania
15146. Our telephone number at this address is (412) 856-0363.
Our Organizational Structure
In 1998, Standard Bank reorganized into the mutual holding company form of organization by
forming Standard Mutual Holding Company. Standard Mutual Holding Company owns 100% of the
outstanding shares of common stock of Standard Bank. Standard Mutual Holding Company is a mutual
holding company that has no stockholders and is controlled by the depositors of Standard Bank.
1
Pursuant to the terms of Standard Mutual Holding Companys plan of conversion, Standard Mutual
Holding Company will convert from a mutual holding company to the stock holding company corporate
structure. In addition, we intend to contribute cash and shares of common stock to a charitable
foundation we will establish in connection with the conversion. Upon the completion of the
conversion, Standard Mutual Holding Company will cease to exist, and Standard Bank will be a wholly
owned subsidiary of Standard Financial Corp.
Market Area
We conduct our operations from our ten branch offices (nine of which are full service) located
in the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany County, Maryland.
Standard Bank considers its primary market area to be eastern Allegheny, Westmoreland, northern
Fayette and southern Bedford counties in Pennsylvania and Allegany County, Maryland.
Our market area did not fully benefit from the national economic expansion during the period
prior to the current economic recession, and as a result, it has not been as severely affected
during the current economic recession. The national unemployment rate has remained over 9% and
real estate prices across the country have declined substantially in many markets. Recently, there
have been some signs of economic improvement both nationally and in our market area, although the
unemployment rate in the eastern portion of our market area remains somewhat higher than the
unemployment rates of Pennsylvania and Maryland, respectively.
In comparison to many areas throughout the country, real estate values in our market have been
reasonably stable, as many areas in the country experienced more significant increases in real
estate values during the past decade. Management believes that this, combined with a more moderate
employment situation within our market area, has resulted in a less severe decline in real estate
market values in our market area compared to many other parts of the country.
Our market area has a broad range of private employers, and has changed its focus from heavy
industry to more specialized industries and service providers, including technology, health care,
education and finance. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania is the headquarters for seven Fortune 500
companies, including H.J. Heinz, USX Corporation and Alcoa Inc. Westmoreland County is east of
Allegheny County and is part of the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Allegany County, Maryland is
part of the Cumberland, Maryland-West Virginia metropolitan area, which is equidistant from
Pittsburgh and Baltimore, and its economy includes information technology, biotechnology, medical
services and manufacturing.
Median household income levels in our market area have been mixed. Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania and Allegany County, Maryland have trailed the median household income growth rate of
their respective states and the nation over the last several years, while Westmoreland and Fayette
Counties have outpaced it. However, the median household income in each of the counties within our
market area is substantially less than their respective states and nationally.
2
Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to grow and improve our profitability by:
|
|
|
Remaining a community-oriented financial institution while continuing to increase
our customer base of small and medium-size businesses in our market area; |
|
|
|
Increasing commercial real estate lending while maintaining conservative loan
underwriting standards; |
|
|
|
Emphasizing lower cost core deposits by attracting new customers and enhancing
existing customer relationships; |
|
|
|
Expanding our branch network, through branch purchases and de novo branching; and |
|
|
|
Pursuing future expansion and acquisition opportunities with the capital raised in
the conversion, although we have no current arrangements or agreements with respect to
any such acquisitions. |
A full description of our products and services begins on page 86 of this prospectus under the
heading Business of Standard Bank.
These strategies are intended to guide our investment of the net proceeds of the offering. We
intend to continue to pursue our business strategy after the conversion and the offering, subject
to changes necessitated by future market conditions and other factors. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsBusiness Strategy for a
further discussion of our business strategy.
Reasons for the Conversion
While Standard Bank currently exceeds all regulatory capital requirements, the proceeds from
the sale of common stock will increase our capital, which will support our continued lending and
operations growth. In deciding to pursue the conversion and offering at this time our Board of
Directors considered current market conditions, the amount of capital needed for continued growth
and that the offering will not raise excessive capital.
Additionally, we considered the following reasons for converting and raising additional
capital:
|
|
|
to support our internal growth through lending (with a particular emphasis on
commercial real estate lending) in communities we serve or may serve in the future; |
|
|
|
to provide additional financial resources to pursue future expansion and acquisition
opportunities, although we have no current arrangements or agreements with respect to
any such acquisitions; |
|
|
|
to improve our capital position during a period of significant economic uncertainty; |
|
|
|
to provide us with better capital management tools, including the ability to pay
dividends and to repurchase shares of our common stock, subject to market conditions; |
3
|
|
|
to form a charitable foundation to benefit the communities we serve; and |
|
|
|
to retain and attract qualified personnel by establishing stock-based benefit plans. |
We believe that the additional capital raised in the offering will enable us to take advantage
of business opportunities that may not otherwise be available to us. As of March 31, 2010,
Standard Bank was considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes and is not subject to a
directive or a recommendation from the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve
Board) to raise capital.
For further information about our reasons for the conversion and stock offering, please see
The ConversionReasons for the Conversion.
Terms of the Conversion and the Offering
Under Standard Mutual Holding Companys plan of conversion, our organization will convert to a
fully public stock holding company structure. In connection with the conversion, we are offering
between 2,550,000 and 3,450,000 shares of common stock to eligible depositors of Standard Bank, to
our employee benefit plans and, to the extent shares remain available, to the general public. The
number of shares of common stock to be sold may be increased to up to 3,967,500 shares as a result
of demand for the shares or changes in the market for financial institution stocks. Unless the
number of shares of common stock to be offered is increased to more than 3,967,500 shares or
decreased to less than 2,550,000 shares, or the offering is extended beyond November 1, 2010,
subscribers will not have the opportunity to change or cancel their stock orders.
The purchase price of each share of common stock to be issued in the offering is $10.00. All
investors will pay the same purchase price per share. Investors will not be charged a commission
to purchase shares of common stock in the offering. Stifel, Nicolaus
& Company, Incorporated, our marketing
advisor in the offering, will use its best efforts to assist us in selling shares of our common
stock. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated is not obligated to purchase any shares of common stock in the
offering.
Persons Who May Order Shares of Common Stock in the Offering
We are offering the shares of common stock in a subscription offering in the following
descending order of priority:
|
|
|
First, to depositors of Standard Bank with aggregate account balances of at least
$50 as of the close of business on March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
Second, to Standard Banks tax-qualified employee benefit plans (including our
employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan), which will receive, without payment
therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase in the aggregate up to 10% of
the shares of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the charitable
foundation. We expect our employee stock ownership plan to purchase 8% of the shares
of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation. If
market conditions warrant, the employee stock ownership plan may instead elect to
purchase shares in the open market following the completion of the conversion. |
4
|
|
|
Third, to depositors of Standard Bank with aggregate account balances of at least
$50 as of the close of business on June 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
Fourth, to depositors of Standard Bank as of July 28, 2010. |
Shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering may be offered for sale to
the general public in a community offering, with a preference given to natural persons and trusts
of natural persons residing in the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and
Allegany County, Maryland, and thereafter to other members of the general public. The community
offering may begin concurrently with, during or promptly after the subscription offering as we may
determine at any time. If shares remain available for sale following the subscription offering or
community offering, we also may offer for sale shares of common stock through a syndicated
community offering managed by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company. We have the right to accept or reject,
in our sole discretion, orders received in the community offering or syndicated community offering.
To ensure a proper allocation of stock, each subscriber eligible to purchase stock in the
subscription offering must list on his or her stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or
she had an ownership interest at the applicable eligibility date. Failure to list all accounts, or
providing incorrect information, could result in the loss of all or part of a subscribers stock
allocation. Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the plan of conversion and of the
acceptability of the order forms will be final.
If we receive orders for more shares than we are offering, we may not be able to fully or
partially fill your order. Shares will be allocated first, in the order of priority, to
subscribers in the subscription offering before any shares are allocated in the community offering.
For a detailed description of the offering, including share allocation procedures, please see
The Conversion.
How We Determined the Offering Range
The amount of common stock that we are offering is based on an independent appraisal of the
estimated market value of Standard Financial Corp., assuming the conversion and the offering are
completed and the charitable foundation is funded with a contribution of cash and common stock. RP
Financial, LC., our independent appraiser, has estimated that, as of May 28, 2010, this market
value, including shares sold in the offering and issued to the foundation, was $31,050,000. By
regulation, the market value constitutes the midpoint of a valuation range, with a minimum of
$26,392,500, and a maximum of $35,707,500. Based on this market value, and excluding the shares
issued to the foundation, the offering ranges from a minimum of $25,500,000 to a maximum of
$34,500,000 with a midpoint of $30,000,000. The $10.00 per share price was selected primarily
because it is the price most commonly used in mutual-to-stock conversions of financial
institutions. If market conditions warrant, the market value, including shares sold in the
offering and issued to the foundation, can be increased to $41,063,630, and the offering, excluding
shares issued to the foundation can be increased to $39,675,000.
RP Financial, LC. advised the Board of Directors that the appraisal was prepared in
conformance with the regulatory appraisal methodology. This methodology requires a valuation based
on an analysis of the trading prices of comparable public companies whose stocks have traded for at
least one year prior to the valuation date. RP Financial, LC. selected a group of 10 comparable
public companies for this analysis that comprised the peer group for valuation purposes.
Consistent with applicable appraisal guidelines, the appraisal applied three primary methodologies:
the pro forma price-to-book value approach applied to both reported book value and tangible book
value; the pro forma price-to-earnings
5
approach applied to reported and core earnings; and the pro forma price-to-assets approach. Based
on RP Financials belief that asset size is not a strong determinant of market value, RP Financial
did not place significant weight on the pro forma price-to-assets approach in reaching its
conclusions. RP Financial placed the greatest emphasis on the price-to-earnings and price-to-book
approaches in estimating pro forma market value. The market value ratios applied in the three
methodologies were based upon the current market valuations of the peer group companies identified
by RP Financial, subject to valuation adjustments applied by RP Financial to account for
differences between us and the peer group. Upward adjustments were applied in the valuation for
financial condition and profitability, growth and viability of earnings. Downward valuation
adjustments were applied for our primary market area and marketing of the common stock. No
adjustment was applied in the valuation for asset growth, liquidity of the common stock, dividends,
management and the effect of government regulations and regulatory reform. The upward adjustments
considered, among other factors, our more favorable asset quality measures, higher pro forma
capital ratios, and stronger return on average assets when compared to the peer group. The
downward valuation adjustments considered the less attractive demographic trends in our primary
market area (shrinking population, comparable or lower per capita income and lower deposit market
shares) versus the peer group and the valuation considerations applied by potential investors in
purchasing a newly issued stock that has no prior trading history in a volatile market for thrift
and savings bank common stock.
The appraisal peer group consists of the following companies, with asset size as of March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company Name |
|
Ticker Symbol |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Headquarters |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. |
|
CZWI |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Eau Claire, WI |
|
$ |
577 |
|
Elmira Savings Bank, FSB |
|
ESBK |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Elmira, NY |
|
$ |
489 |
|
First Capital, Inc. |
|
FCAP |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Corydon, IN |
|
$ |
463 |
|
First Savings Financial Group |
|
FSFG |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Clarksville, IN |
|
$ |
494 |
|
Harleysville Savings Financial Corp. |
|
HARL |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Harleysville, PA |
|
$ |
843 |
|
River Valley Bancorp |
|
RIVR |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Madison, IN |
|
$ |
395 |
|
Rome Bancorp, Inc. |
|
ROME |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Rome, NY |
|
$ |
328 |
|
TF Financial Corp. |
|
THRD |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Newtown, PA |
|
$ |
716 |
|
Wayne Savings Bancshares |
|
WAYN |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Wooster, OH |
|
$ |
406 |
|
WVS Financial Corp. |
|
WVFC |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Pittsburgh, PA |
|
$ |
377 |
|
The following table presents a summary of selected pricing ratios for the peer group
companies and Standard (on a pro forma basis). The pricing ratios are based on earnings and other
information as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2010, stock price information as of May
28, 2010, as reflected in RP Financial, LC.s appraisal report, dated May 28, 2010, and the number
of shares assumed to be outstanding as described in Pro Forma Data. Compared to the average
pricing of the peer group, our pro forma pricing ratios at the maximum of the offering range
indicated a discount of 38.1% on a price-to-book value basis, a discount of 35.2% on a
price-to-tangible book value basis, and a discount of 2.9% on a price-to-earnings basis.
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price-to-earnings |
|
|
Price-to-book |
|
|
Price-to-tangible |
|
|
|
multiple(1) |
|
|
value ratio |
|
|
book value ratio |
|
Standard (on a pro
forma basis,
assuming completion
of the conversion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
11.01x |
|
|
|
40.78 |
% |
|
|
47.98 |
% |
Midpoint |
|
|
12.94x |
|
|
|
45.23 |
% |
|
|
52.69 |
% |
Maximum |
|
|
14.86x |
|
|
|
49.16 |
% |
|
|
56.75 |
% |
Maximum, as adjusted |
|
|
17.06x |
|
|
|
53.22 |
% |
|
|
60.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of peer
group companies, as
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Averages |
|
|
15.30x |
|
|
|
79.38 |
% |
|
|
87.62 |
% |
Medians |
|
|
12.79x |
|
|
|
80.81 |
% |
|
|
88.09 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information is derived from the RP Financial, LC. appraisal report and are based upon
reported earnings for the twelve months ended March 31, 2010. These ratios are different from
the ratios in Pro Forma Data. |
Compared to the median pricing of the peer group, our pro forma pricing ratios at the
maximum of the offering range indicated a discount of 39.2% on a price-to-book value basis, a
discount of 35.6% on a price-to-tangible book value basis, and a premium of 16.2% on a core
price-to-earnings basis.
Our Board of Directors carefully reviewed the information provided to it by RP Financial, LC.
through the appraisal process, but did not make any determination regarding whether prior standard
mutual-to-stock conversions have been undervalued. Instead, we engaged RP Financial, LC. to help
us understand the regulatory process as it applies to the appraisal and to advise the Board of
Directors as to how much capital Standard Financial Corp. would be required to raise under the
regulatory appraisal guidelines.
The independent appraisal also reflects the contribution of cash and shares of common stock to
the charitable foundation we are organizing in connection with the conversion. The contribution of
cash and shares of our common stock to the charitable foundation will reduce our estimated pro
forma market value. See Comparison of Valuation and Pro Forma Information With and Without the
Charitable Foundation.
RP Financial, LC. will update the independent appraisal prior to the completion of the
conversion. If the estimated appraised value, including offering shares and excluding shares
contributed to the charitable foundation, changes to either below $25.5 million or above $39.7
million, we will promptly return all funds, establish a new offering range and resolicit persons
who previously submitted stock orders. See The ConversionShare Pricing and Number of Shares to
be Issued.
The independent appraisal does not indicate per share market value. Do not assume or expect
that the valuation of Standard Financial Corp. as indicated above means that, after the conversion
and the offering, the shares of common stock will trade at or above the $10.00 offering price.
Furthermore, the pricing ratios presented above were utilized by RP Financial, LC. to estimate our
market value and not to compare the relative value of shares of our common stock with the value of
the capital stock of the peer group. The value of the capital stock of a particular company may be
affected by a number of factors such as financial performance, asset size and market location.
For a more complete discussion of the amount of common stock we are offering for sale and the
independent appraisal, including a comparison of selected pro forma pricing ratios compared to
pricing ratios of the peer group, see The ConversionShare Pricing and Number of Shares to be
Issued.
7
Limits on How Much Common Stock You May Purchase
The minimum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased is 25. Generally, no
individual may purchase more than 20,000 shares ($200,000) of common stock in the offering. If any
of the following persons purchases shares of common stock, their purchases, in all categories of
the offering, when combined with your purchases, cannot exceed 30,000 shares ($300,000):
|
|
|
your spouse or relatives of you or your spouse living in your house; |
|
|
|
most companies, trusts or other entities in which you are a trustee, have a
substantial beneficial interest or hold a senior management position; or |
|
|
|
other persons who may be your associates or persons acting in concert with you. |
See the detailed descriptions of acting in concert and associate in The
ConversionLimitations on Common Stock Purchases.
How You May Purchase Shares of Common Stock
In the subscription offering and community offering, you may pay for your shares only by:
|
|
|
personal check, bank check or money order, made payable to Standard Financial Corp.;
or |
|
|
|
authorizing us to withdraw funds from the types of Standard Bank deposit accounts
permitted on the stock order form. |
Standard Bank is not permitted to knowingly lend funds to anyone for the purpose of purchasing
shares of common stock in the offering. Additionally, you may not submit a check drawn on a
Standard Bank line of credit, and you may not submit a third-party check to pay for shares of
common stock. Please do not submit cash. Wire transfers may not be used to pay for shares of
common stock.
You can subscribe for shares of common stock in the offering by delivering a signed and
completed original stock order form, together with full payment or authorization to withdraw from
one or more of your Standard Bank deposit accounts (other than accounts with check-writing
privileges), so that it is received (not postmarked) before 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September
17, 2010, which is the expiration of the offering period. You may submit your stock order form by
mail using the stock order reply envelope provided, by overnight courier to the indicated address
on the order form or by hand-delivery to Standard Banks executive office, which is located at 2640
Monroeville Boulevard, Monroeville, Pennsylvania. We will not accept stock order forms at other
Standard Bank offices. Please do not mail stock order forms to Standard Bank.
You may be able to subscribe for shares of common stock using funds in your individual
retirement account (IRA) or other retirement account. If you wish to use some or all of the
funds in your Standard Bank IRA or other Standard Bank retirement account to purchase our common
stock, the applicable funds must first be transferred to a self-directed account maintained by an
independent trustee, such as a brokerage firm, and the purchase must be made through that account.
Because individual circumstances differ and processing of retirement fund orders takes additional
time, we recommend that you contact our Stock Information Center promptly, preferably at least two
weeks before the September 17, 2010 expiration of the offering period, for assistance with
purchases using funds from your Standard
8
Bank retirement account or any retirement account that you may have elsewhere. Whether you
may use such funds for the purchase of shares in the stock offering may depend on time constraints
and, possibly, limitations imposed by the brokerage firm or institution where your funds are held.
See The ConversionProcedure for Purchasing Shares for a complete description of how to
purchase shares in the stock offering.
Deadline for Orders of Common Stock
The deadline for purchasing shares of common stock in the offering is 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on September 17, 2010. Your stock order form, with full payment, must be received (not postmarked)
by 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time on September 17, 2010.
Although we will make reasonable attempts to provide a prospectus and offering materials to
holders of subscription rights, the subscription offering and all subscription rights will expire
at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 17, 2010, whether or not we have been able to locate each
person entitled to subscription rights.
See The ConversionProcedure for Purchasing Shares for a complete description of how to
purchase shares in the stock offering.
Delivery of Shares of Common Stock in the Subscription and Community Offerings
Stock certificates will not be issued (except to directors and executive officers, whose
ability to sell their shares of common stock is restricted by federal securities and banking laws).
Instead, all shares of common stock sold in the subscription and community offerings will be
issued in book-entry form, through the Direct Registration System, which allows each investors
shares to be maintained on the books of our transfer agent. Shortly after the conversion is
completed, our transfer agent will issue DRS statements to investors, reflecting their stock
ownership. Statements will be sent by first class mail to the stock registration address noted by
the investor on the stock order form. Though investors will not possess a stock certificate, they
will retain all stockholder rights, including the ability to sell shares. Although the shares of
common stock will have begun trading, brokerage firms are likely to require that you have received
your statement prior to selling your shares. You will be able to purchase additional shares of
Standard Financial Corp. common stock through a brokerage firm.
After-Market Stock Price Performance Provided by Independent Appraiser
The following table presents stock price performance information for all standard
mutual-to-stock conversions completed between January 1, 2009 and May 28, 2010. None of these
companies was included in the group of 10 comparable public companies utilized in RP Financial,
LC.s valuation analysis.
9
Mutual-to-Stock Conversion Offerings with Closing Dates
between January 1, 2009 and May 28, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Price Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Initial Trading Date |
|
Company Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%) |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
(%) |
|
|
Through May 28, |
|
Ticker Symbol |
|
Conversion Date |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
One Day |
|
|
One Week |
|
|
One Month |
|
|
2010 (%) |
|
Harvard Illinois Bancorp, Inc. (HARI) |
|
|
4/09/10 |
|
|
OTCBB |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
OBA Financial Services, Inc. (OBAF) |
|
|
1/22/10 |
|
|
NASDAQ |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. (OABC) |
|
|
1/21/10 |
|
|
NASDAQ |
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Versailles Financial Corp. (VERF) |
|
|
1/13/10 |
|
|
OTCBB |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Athens Bancshares, Inc. (AFCB) |
|
|
1/07/10 |
|
|
NASDAQ |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Territorial Bancorp, Inc. (TBNK) |
|
|
7/15/09 |
|
|
NASDAQ |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
St. Joseph Bancorp, Inc. (SJBA) |
|
|
2/02/09 |
|
|
OTCBB |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Hibernia Hmstd Bncrp, Inc. (HIBE) |
|
|
1/28/09 |
|
|
OTCBB |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Median |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
High |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
Stock price performance is affected by many factors, including, but not limited to:
general market and economic conditions; the interest rate environment; the amount of proceeds a
company raises in its offering; and numerous factors relating to the specific company, including
the experience and ability of management, historical and anticipated operating results, the nature
and quality of the companys assets, and the companys market area. None of the companies listed
in the table above are exactly similar to Standard Financial Corp. The pricing ratios for their
stock offerings were in some cases different from the pricing ratios for Standard Financial Corp.s
common stock and the market conditions in which these offerings were completed were, in most cases,
different from current market conditions. The performance of these stocks may not be indicative of
how our stock will perform.
There can be no assurance that our stock price will not trade below $10.00 per share, as has
been the case for many mutual-to-stock conversions. Before you make an investment decision, we
urge you to carefully read this prospectus, including, but not limited to, the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 17.
Steps We May Take If We Do Not Receive Orders for the Minimum Number of Shares
If we do not receive orders for at least 2,550,000 shares of common stock, we may take the
following steps to issue the minimum number of shares of common stock in the offering range:
|
|
|
increase the maximum purchase limitations; and/or |
|
|
|
seek the approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the
Federal Reserve Board to extend the offering beyond November 1, 2010, so long as we
resolicit subscriptions that we have previously received in the offering. |
If one or more purchase limitations are increased, subscribers in the subscription offering
who ordered the maximum amount and indicated on their stock order forms a desire to be resolicited,
will be given the opportunity to increase their subscription up to the then-applicable limit.
10
Possible Change in the Offering Range
|
|
|
RP Financial, LC. will update its appraisal before we complete the
offering. If, as a result of demand for the shares or changes in market conditions, RP
Financial, LC. determines that our pro forma market value has increased, we may sell up
to 3,967,500 shares in the offering without further notice to you. If our pro forma
market value including the shares to be issued to the foundation (following the
completion of any authorized extension of the offering) is either below $26.4 million
or above $41.1 million and the number of shares of common stock to be sold is increased
to more than 3,967,500 shares or decreased to fewer than 2,550,000 shares, we will
cancel subscribers orders, promptly return all funds with interest, cancel deposit
account withdrawal authorizations and establish a new offering range. Subscribers will
be given an opportunity to place a new stock order. |
In the event that we extend the offering without changing the stock offering range and conduct
a resolicitation, we will notify subscribers of the extension of time and of the rights of
subscribers to maintain, change or cancel their stock orders within a specified period. If a
subscriber does not respond during the period, his or her stock order will be cancelled and payment
will be returned promptly, with interest calculated at our statement savings rate, and deposit
account withdrawal authorizations will be cancelled.
Possible Termination of the Offering
We may terminate the offering at any time and for any reason prior to the special meeting of
depositors of Standard Bank that is being called to vote upon the conversion, and at any time after
depositor approval with the approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal
Reserve Board. If we terminate the offering, we will promptly return your funds with interest
calculated at Standard Banks statement savings rate, and we will cancel deposit account withdrawal
authorizations.
How We Intend to Use the Proceeds From the Offering
We intend to invest 50% of the net proceeds from the offering in Standard Bank, loan funds to
our employee stock ownership plan to fund its purchase of our shares of common stock, contribute
$200,000 in cash and a number of shares of common stock with a value equal to 3.5% of the shares
sold in the offering to the charitable foundation and retain the remainder of the net proceeds from
the offering. Therefore, assuming we sell 3,000,000 shares of common stock in the stock offering,
and we have net proceeds of $28.6 million, we intend to invest $14.3 million in Standard Bank, loan
$2.5 million to our employee stock ownership plan to fund its purchase of our shares of common
stock, contribute $200,000 to Standard Charitable Foundation, and retain the remaining $11.6
million of the net proceeds.
11
The following table summarizes how we intend to distribute the net proceeds from the stock
offering, based on the sale of share at the minimum and maximum of the offering range:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,550,000 Shares at |
|
|
3,450,000 Shares at |
|
|
|
$10.00 |
|
|
$10.00 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Per Share |
|
|
Per Share |
|
Offering Proceeds |
|
$ |
25,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,500,000 |
|
Less: offering expenses (estimated) |
|
|
1,356,000 |
|
|
|
1,439,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net offering proceeds |
|
|
24,144,000 |
|
|
|
33,061,000 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds contributed to Standard Bank |
|
|
12,072,000 |
|
|
|
16,531,000 |
|
Cash contributed to foundation |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Proceeds used for loan to employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
2,111,000 |
|
|
|
2,857,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds retained by Standard Financial Corp. |
|
$ |
9,761,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,474,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may use the funds we retain for investments, to pay cash dividends, to repurchase
shares of common stock and for other general corporate purposes. Standard Bank may use the
proceeds it receives from us to support increased lending and other products and services, and to
repay borrowings.
Please see the section of this prospectus entitled How We Intend to Use the Proceeds from the
Offering for more information on the proposed use of the proceeds from the offering.
You May Not Sell or Transfer Your Subscription Rights
Regulations issued by the Office of Thrift Supervision or Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, as implemented by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Federal Reserve Board,
prohibit you from transferring your subscription rights. If you order shares of common stock in
the subscription offering, you will be required to state that you are purchasing the shares of
common stock for yourself and that you have no agreement or understanding to sell or transfer your
subscription rights. We intend to take legal action, including reporting persons to federal or
state regulatory agencies, against anyone who we believe has sold or given away his or her
subscription rights. We will not accept your order if we have reason to believe that you have sold
or transferred your subscription rights. When completing your stock order form, you should not add
the name(s) of persons who do not have subscription rights or who qualify in a lower subscription
offering priority than you do. In addition, the stock order form requires that you list all
deposit accounts, giving all names on each account and the account number at the applicable
eligibility record date. Your failure to provide this information, or providing incomplete or
incorrect information, may result in a loss of part or all of your share allocation, if there is an
oversubscription.
Purchases by Officers and Directors
We expect our directors and executive officers, together with their associates, to subscribe
for 160,000 shares ($1.6 million) of common stock in the offering, or 6.3% of the shares to be sold
at the minimum of the offering range. The purchase price paid by our directors and executive
officers for their shares will be the same $10.00 per share price paid by all other persons who
purchase shares of common stock in the offering.
See Subscriptions by Directors and Executive Officers for more information on the proposed
purchases of our shares of common stock by our directors and executive officers.
12
Benefits to Management and Potential Dilution to Stockholders Following the Conversion
We expect our employee stock ownership plan, which is a tax-qualified retirement plan for the
benefit of all our employees, to purchase 8% of the total number of shares of common stock that we
sell in the offering and issue to the charitable foundation. Purchases by the employee stock
ownership plan will be included in determining whether the required minimum number of shares has
been sold in the offering. We reserve the right to purchase shares of common stock in the open
market following the stock offering in order to fund all or a portion of the employee stock
ownership plan.
Our current intention is to adopt one or more stock-based benefit plans no earlier than twelve
months after completion of the conversion. Stockholder approval of these plans will be required,
and the stock-based benefit plans cannot be implemented until at least six months after the
completion of the conversion pursuant to regulations as implemented by the Pennsylvania Department
of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board. If adopted within 12 months following the completion of
the conversion, the stock-based benefit plan will reserve a number of shares of common stock equal
to not more than 4% of the shares sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation
(reduced by amounts purchased in the stock offering by our 401(k) plan using its purchase priority
in the stock offering), for restricted stock awards to key employees and directors, at no cost to
the recipients, and will also reserve a number of stock options equal to not more than 10% of the
shares of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation for key
employees and directors. If the stock-based benefit plans are adopted after one year from the date
of the completion of the conversion, the 4% and 10% limitations described above will no longer
apply, and we may adopt stock-based benefit plans encompassing more than 14% of our shares of
common stock.
The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock and aggregate dollar value
of grants (valuing each share granted at the offering price of $10.00) that would be available
under one or more stock-based benefit plans if such plans reserve a number of shares of common
stock equal to not more than 4% and 10% of the shares sold in the offering and issued to the
charitable foundation for restricted stock awards and stock options, respectively. The table shows
the dilution to stockholders if all of these shares are issued from authorized but unissued shares,
instead of shares purchased in the open market. The table also sets forth the number of shares of
common stock to be acquired by the employee stock ownership plan for allocation to all eligible
employees.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares to be Granted or Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Grants (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution Resulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
As a Percentage of |
|
|
From Issuance of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
At Minimum of |
|
|
Adjusted Maximum of |
|
|
Common Stock to be |
|
|
Shares for Stock |
|
|
At Minimum of |
|
|
Adjusted Maximum of |
|
|
|
Offering Range |
|
|
Offering Range |
|
|
Issued (2) |
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
Offering Range |
|
|
Offering Range |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
211,140 |
|
|
|
328,509 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
$ |
3,285 |
|
Stock awards |
|
|
105,570 |
|
|
|
164,255 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
263,925 |
|
|
|
410,636 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
9.09 |
% |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
580,635 |
|
|
|
903,400 |
|
|
|
22.00 |
% |
|
|
12.28 |
% |
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
|
$ |
6,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The actual value of restricted stock grants will be determined based on their fair value as
of the date grants are made. For purposes of this table, fair value is assumed to be the same
as the offering price of $10.00 per share. The fair value of stock options has been estimated
at $2.97 per option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based upon assumptions
described in Pro Forma Data. The actual expense of stock options granted under a
stock-based benefit plan will be determined by the grant-date fair value of the options, which
will depend on a number of factors, including the valuation assumptions used in the option
pricing model ultimately adopted, which may or may not be the Black-Scholes model. |
|
(2) |
|
The stock-based benefit plans may award a greater number of options and shares and issued to
the charitable foundation, respectively, if the plans are adopted more than 12 months after
the completion of the conversion. |
In addition to the stock-based benefit plans that we may adopt, we intend to enter into
employment agreements and change of control agreements with certain of our executive and other
officers. See Management of Standard Financial Corp.Executive Officer Compensation for a
further discussion of these agreements, including their terms and potential costs, as well as a
description of other benefits arrangements. In addition, for further information with respect to
the expenses related to the stock-based benefit plans, see Risk FactorsOur stock-based benefit
plans will increase our costs, which will reduce our income and Management of Standard Financial
Corp.Benefits to be Considered Following Completion of the Stock Offering.
Market for Common Stock
We expect that our common stock will be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under
the symbol STND. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company currently intends to make a market in the shares of
our common stock, but is under no obligation to do so. See Market for the Common Stock.
Our Issuance of Shares of Common Stock and Cash to the Charitable Foundation
To further our commitment to the communities we serve and may serve in the future, we intend,
subject to approval of our depositors, to establish and fund a new charitable foundation as part of
the conversion. Standard Financial Corp. intends to contribute to the charitable foundation
$200,000 in cash and shares of common stock with an aggregate value of stock equal to 3.5% of the
shares sold in the stock offering. These shares and cash will have a value of $1.1 million at the
minimum of the valuation range and $1.4 million at the maximum of the valuation range, subject to
adjustment to $1.6 million. As a result of the issuance of shares to the charitable foundation and
the cash contribution, we expect to record an after-tax expense of approximately $700,000 at the
minimum of the valuation range and approximately $1.0 million at the adjusted maximum of the
valuation range, during the quarter in which the conversion is completed.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, a corporate entity is generally permitted to deduct up to 10%
of its taxable income (taxable income before the charitable contributions deduction) in any one
year for charitable contributions. Any contribution in excess of the 10% limit may generally be
deducted for federal income tax purposes over the five years following the year in which the
charitable contribution
14
was made. Accordingly, a charitable contribution by a corporate entity to a charitable
foundation could, if necessary, be deducted for federal income tax purposes over a six-year period.
Our overall charitable contribution deduction could be limited if our future taxable income is
insufficient to allow for the full deduction within the 10% of taxable income limitation, which
would result in an increase to income tax expense.
The new charitable foundation will be governed by a Board of Directors, initially consisting
of the current members of the Companys Board of Directors (except for Timothy K. Zimmerman, our
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director), and one individual who is not affiliated with
us. None of these individuals will receive compensation for their service as a director of the
charitable foundation. In addition, some of our employees will serve as executive officers of the
charitable foundation. None of these individuals will receive compensation for their service as an
executive officer of the charitable foundation.
The new charitable foundation will be dedicated to supporting charitable causes and community
development activities in the communities in which we operate or may operate in the future. In
addition to traditional community contributions and community reinvestment initiatives, the
charitable foundation is expected to emphasize grants or donations to support housing assistance,
local education and other types of organizations or civic-minded projects.
Issuing shares of common stock to the charitable foundation will:
|
|
|
dilute the ownership interests of purchasers of shares of our common stock in the
stock offering; |
|
|
|
dilute the voting interests of purchasers of shares of our common stock in the stock
offering; and |
|
|
|
result in an expense, and a reduction in our earnings during the quarter in which
the contribution is made, equal to the full amount of the contribution to the
charitable foundation, offset in part by a potential corresponding tax benefit equal to
up to 34.2% of such contribution. |
The establishment and funding of the charitable foundation has been approved by the Board of
Trustees of Standard Mutual Holding Company, and must be approved by the depositors of Standard
Bank at its special meeting being held to consider and vote upon the plan of conversion. If
depositors do not approve the establishment and funding of the charitable foundation, we will
proceed with the conversion and offering without the foundation and subscribers for common stock
will not be resolicited (unless required by the Federal Reserve Board or the Pennsylvania
Department of Banking). Without the charitable foundation, RP Financial, LC. estimates that our
pro forma valuation would be greater and, as a result, a greater number of shares of common stock
would be issued in the offering. See Comparison of Valuation and Pro Forma Information With and
Without the Charitable Foundation.
RP Financial, LC. will update its appraisal of our estimated pro forma market value at the
conclusion of the offering. The pro forma market value reflected in that updated appraisal will be
based on the facts and circumstances existing at that time, including, among other things, market
and economic conditions, as well as whether the charitable foundation is formed and funded with
shares of our common stock.
See Risk FactorsThe contribution of shares to the charitable foundation will dilute your
ownership interests and adversely affect net income, Risk FactorsOur contribution to the
charitable
15
foundation may not be tax deductible, which could reduce our profits, Comparison of
Valuation and Pro Forma Information With and Without the Charitable Foundation and Standard
Charitable Foundation.
Our Policy Regarding Dividends
Following completion of the stock offering, our Board of Directors will have the authority to
declare dividends on our common stock, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. However,
no decision has been made with respect to the amount, if any, and timing of any dividend payments.
The payment and amount of any dividend payments will depend upon a number of factors.
For further information, see Our Policy Regarding Dividends.
Tax Consequences
As a general matter, the conversion will not be a taxable transaction for federal or state
income tax purposes to Standard Mutual Holding Company, Standard Bank, Standard Financial Corp., or
persons eligible to subscribe in the subscription offering. See The ConversionMaterial Income
Tax Consequences for additional information.
Conditions to Completion of the Conversion and the Offering
We cannot complete the conversion and the offering unless:
|
|
|
the plan of conversion is approved by at least a majority of votes eligible to be
cast by depositors of Standard Bank. A special meeting of depositors to consider and
vote upon the plan of conversion has been set for September 23, 2010; |
|
|
|
we have received and accepted orders to purchase at least the
minimum number of shares of common stock offered; and |
|
|
|
we receive final approval of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking (from whom we
have received conditional approval) and the Federal Reserve Board to complete the
conversion and the offering. |
How You Can Obtain Additional Information
Our branch office personnel may not, by law, assist with investment-related questions about
the offering. If you have any questions regarding the conversion or the offering, please call our
Stock Information Center, toll free, at (877) 821-5778, Monday through Friday between 10:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Stock Information Center will be closed on weekends and bank
holidays.
TO ENSURE THAT EACH PERSON RECEIVES A PROSPECTUS AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE OF
SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW, NO PROSPECTUS WILL BE MAILED OR HAND-DELIVERED
ANY LATER THAN FIVE DAYS OR TWO DAYS, RESPECTIVELY, PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 17, 2010.
16
RISK FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risk factors in evaluating an investment in our shares of common stock.
Risks Related to Our Business
Because we intend to continue to emphasize commercial real estate loan originations, our credit
risk will increase and continued weakness in the local real estate market or economy could
adversely affect our earnings.
We intend to continue our emphasis on originating commercial real estate loans. Commercial
real estate loans generally have more risk than the one- to four-family residential real estate
loans we originate. Because the repayment of commercial real estate loans depends on the
successful management and operation of the borrowers properties or related businesses, repayment
of such loans can be affected by adverse conditions in the local real estate market or economy.
Commercial real estate loans may also involve relatively large loan balances to individual
borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Any continued weakness or downturn in the real estate
market or the local economy could adversely affect the value of properties securing the loan or the
revenues from the borrowers business, thereby increasing the risk of nonperforming loans. As our
commercial real estate portfolio increases, the corresponding risks and potential for losses from
these loans may also increase.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will
decrease.
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio,
including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets
serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the
allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, and we
evaluate economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may
not be sufficient to cover probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions
to our allowance. Material additions to our allowance could materially decrease our net income.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require
us to increase our allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase
in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities
might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Future changes in interest rates could reduce our profits.
Our ability to make a profit largely depends on our net interest income, which could be
negatively affected by changes in interest rates. Net interest income is the difference between:
|
|
|
the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and
securities; and |
|
|
|
|
the interest expense we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits
and borrowings. |
As a result of our historical focus on one- to four-family residential real estate loans, the
majority of our loans have fixed interest rates. Additionally, many of our securities investments
have fixed interest rates. Like many savings institutions, our focus on deposit accounts as a
source of funds, which have no
17
stated maturity date or short contractual maturities, results in our liabilities having a
shorter duration than our assets. For example, as of March 31, 2010, 42.3% of our loans had
maturities of 15 years or longer, while 28.3% of our certificates of deposit had maturities of one
year or less. This imbalance can create significant earnings volatility, because market interest
rates change over time. In a period of rising interest rates, the interest income earned on our
assets, such as loans and investments, may not increase as rapidly as the interest paid on our
liabilities, such as deposits. In a period of declining interest rates, the interest income earned
on our assets may decrease more rapidly than the interest paid on our liabilities, as borrowers
prepay mortgage loans, and mortgage-backed securities and callable investment securities are called
or prepaid, thereby requiring us to reinvest these cash flows at lower interest rates. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsManagement
of Market Risk.
Changes in interest rates creates reinvestment risk, which is the risk that we may not be able
to reinvest prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates we earned on the prepaid loans or
securities in a declining interest rate environment. Additionally, increases in interest rates may
decrease loan demand and/or make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable-rate loans.
Changes in interest rates also affect the current fair value of our interest-earning securities
portfolio. Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest rates.
At March 31, 2010, the rate shock analysis indicated that our net portfolio value
(the difference between the present value of our assets and the present value of our liabilities)
would decrease by $2.6 million, or 4.9%, if there was an instantaneous 200 basis point increase in
market interest rates. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of OperationsManagement of Market Risk.
Concentration of loans in our primary market area, which has experienced an economic downturn, may
increase the risk of increased nonperforming assets.
Our success depends primarily on the general economic conditions in the Pennsylvania counties
of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany County, Maryland, as nearly all of our loans
are to customers in these markets. Accordingly, the local economic conditions in these markets
(and the Pittsburgh market area in general) have a significant impact on the ability of borrowers
to repay loans as well as our ability to originate new loans. As such, a continuation of the
decline in real estate values in these markets would also lower the value of the collateral
securing loans on properties in these markets. In addition, a continued weakening in general
economic conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment or other factors beyond our control
could negatively affect our financial results.
According to the National Association of Realtors statistics, the median sales price for
existing single family homes in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania metropolitan area decreased from
$120,700 in 2007 to $118,900 in 2009. The median sales price for existing homes in the United
States also decreased from $217,900 in 2007 to $172,100 in 2009. Home prices in the Pittsburgh
metropolitan area have been and continue to be below the national averages, which makes home
ownership more affordable for customers in our market area.
The slowing local economy also has resulted in a rise in delinquency and
foreclosure rates. For the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, foreclosure activity rose to 44,732
filings in 2009, a 20% increase from the level reported for 2008. For the State of Maryland,
foreclosure activity rose to 43,248 filings in 2009, a 33.7% increase from the level reported for
2008.
18
Continued and sustained deterioration in the housing sector and related markets and prolonged
elevated unemployment levels may adversely affect our business and financial results.
During 2009 and the beginning of 2010, general economic conditions continued to worsen
nationally as well as in our market area. While we did not invest in sub-prime mortgages and
related investments, our lending business is tied significantly to the housing market. Declines in
home prices, and increases in foreclosures and unemployment levels, have adversely impacted the
credit performance of real estate loans, resulting in the write-down of asset values. The
continuing housing slump has resulted in reduced demand for the construction of new housing,
further declines in home prices, and increased delinquencies on construction, residential and
commercial mortgage loans. The ongoing concern about the economy in general has caused many
lenders to reduce or cease providing funding to borrowers. These conditions may also cause a
further reduction in loan demand, and increases in our non-performing assets, net charge-offs and
provisions for loan losses. A worsening of these negative economic conditions could adversely
affect our prospects for growth, asset and goodwill valuations and could result in a decrease in
our interest income and a material increase in our provision for loan losses.
If our investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh is classified as
other-than-temporarily impaired or as permanently impaired, our earnings and stockholders equity
could decrease.
We own common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. We hold this stock to
qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to borrow funds
under the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburghs advance program. The aggregate cost and fair
value of our Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh common stock as of March 31, 2010 was $3.4
million based on its par value. There is no market for our Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh
common stock.
Published reports indicate that certain member banks of the Federal Home Loan Bank System may
be subject to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could result in materially lower
regulatory capital levels. In an extreme situation, it is possible that the capital of a Federal
Home Loan Bank, including the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, could be substantially
diminished or reduced to zero. Consequently, we believe that there is a risk that our investment
in Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh common stock could be impaired at some time in the future,
and if this occurs, it would cause our earnings and stockholders equity to decrease by the
after-tax amount of the impairment charge.
Continued or further declines in the value of certain investment securities could require
write-downs, which would reduce our earnings.
Our securities portfolio includes securities that have declined in value due to negative
perceptions about the health of the financial sector in general and the lack of liquidity for
securities that are real estate related. A prolonged decline in the value of these or other
securities could result in an other-than-temporary impairment write-down which would reduce our
earnings.
The requirement to account for certain assets at estimated fair value, and a proposal to account
for additional financial assets and liabilities at estimated fair value, may adversely affect our
stockholders equity and results of operations.
We report certain assets, including securities, at fair value, and a recent proposal would
require us to report nearly all of our financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Generally,
for assets that are reported at fair value, we use quoted market prices or valuation models that
utilize observable market inputs to estimate fair value. Because we carry these assets on our
books at their estimated fair value, we may incur losses even if the asset in question presents
minimal credit risk. Under current accounting
19
requirements, elevated delinquencies, defaults, and estimated losses from the disposition of
collateral in our private-label mortgage-backed security may require us to recognize additional
other-than-temporary impairments in future periods with respect to our securities portfolio. The
amount and timing of any impairment recognized will depend on the severity and duration of the
decline in the estimated fair value of the asset and our estimate of the anticipated recovery
period. Under proposed accounting requirements, we may be required to record reductions in the
fair value of nearly all of our financial assets and liabilities (including loans) either through a
charge to net income or through a reduction to accumulated other comprehensive income.
Accordingly, we could be required to record charges on assets such as loans where we have no
intention to sell the loan and expect to receive repayment in full on the loan. This could result
in a decrease in net income, or a decrease in our stockholders equity, or both.
Government responses to economic conditions may adversely affect our operations, financial
condition and earnings.
Recently enacted financial institution legislation will change the bank regulatory framework,
create an independent consumer protection bureau that will assume the consumer protection
responsibilities of the various federal banking agencies, and establish more stringent capital
standards for banks and bank holding companies. The legislation will also result in additional
regulations affecting the lending, funding, trading and investment activities of banks and bank
holding companies. Bank regulatory agencies also have been responding aggressively to concerns and
adverse trends identified in examinations. Ongoing uncertainty and adverse developments in the
financial services industry and the domestic and international credit markets, and the effect of
new legislation and regulatory actions in response to these conditions, may adversely affect our
operations by restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell
loans, modify loan terms, or foreclose on property securing loans. These events may have a
significant adverse effect on our financial performance and operating flexibility. In addition,
these risks could affect the performance and value of our loan and investment securities
portfolios, which also would negatively affect our financial performance.
Furthermore, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in an attempt to help the
overall economy, has, among other things, kept interest rates low through its targeted federal
funds rate and the purchase of mortgage-backed securities. If the Federal Reserve increases the
federal funds rate, overall interest rates will likely rise, which may negatively impact the
housing markets and the U.S. economic recovery. In addition, deflationary pressures, while
possibly lowering our operating costs, could have a significant negative effect on our borrowers,
especially our business borrowers, and the values of underlying collateral securing loans, which
could negatively affect our financial performance.
Recently enacted financial reform legislation will, among other things, create a new Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, tighten capital standards and result in new laws and regulations that
are expected to increase our costs of operations.
On July 21, 2010, the President signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). This new law will significantly change the current bank
regulatory structure and affect the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities
of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal
agencies to adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous
studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in
drafting the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of
the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many months or years.
Effective one year after the date of enactment is a provision for the Dodd-Frank Act that
eliminates the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses
to
20
have interest bearing checking accounts. Depending on competitive responses, this significant
change to existing law could have an adverse impact on our interest expense.
The Dodd-Frank Act also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit
insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less
tangible equity capital of a financial institution, rather than deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act also
permanently increases the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and
credit unions to $250,000 per account, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and non-interest bearing
transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. The legislation
also increases the required minimum reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund, from 1.15% to
1.35% of insured deposits, and directs the FDIC to offset the effects of increased assessments on
depository institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.
The Dodd-Frank Act will require publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding
vote on executive compensation and so-called golden parachute payments, and authorizes the
Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate
their own candidates using a companys proxy materials. It also provides that the listing
standards of the national securities exchanges shall require listed companies to implement and
disclose clawback policies mandating the recovery of incentive compensation paid to executive
officers in connection with accounting restatements. The legislation also directs the Federal
Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company
executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.
The Dodd-Frank Act creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to
supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad
rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and
savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts and
practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over
all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Savings banks, such as
Standard Bank, with $10 billion or less in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with
the consumer laws by their primary bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal
preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and
gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires minimum leverage (Tier 1) and risk based capital requirements for
bank and savings and loan holding companies that are no less than those applicable to banks, which
will exclude certain instruments that previously have been eligible for inclusion by bank holding
companies as Tier 1 capital, such as trust preferred securities.
It is difficult to predict at this time what specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to
be written implementing rules and regulations will have on community banks. However, it is
expected that at a minimum they will increase our operating and compliance costs and could increase
our interest expense.
We are subject to extensive regulatory oversight.
We and our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and supervision. Regulators have
intensified their focus on bank lending criteria and controls, and on the USA PATRIOT Acts
anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act compliance requirements. There also is increased
scrutiny of our compliance practices generally and particularly with the rules enforced by the
Office of Foreign Assets Control. It is possible that we are not in full compliance with these
requirements. Our failure to comply with these and other regulatory requirements could lead to,
among other remedies, administrative
21
enforcement actions and legal proceedings. In addition, proposed future legislation and
regulations are likely to have a significant effect on the financial services industry. Regulatory
or legislative changes could make regulatory compliance more difficult or expensive for us, and
could cause us to change or limit some of our products and services, or the way we operate our
business.
Strong competition within our market areas may limit our growth and profitability.
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market areas we
compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms
operating locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater name recognition and market
presence that benefits them in attracting business, and offer certain services that we do not or
cannot provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more
aggressively than we do, which could affect our ability to grow and remain profitable on a
long-term basis. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in
our market areas. If we must raise interest rates paid on deposits or lower interest rates charged
on our loans, our net interest margin and profitability could be adversely affected. For
additional information see Business of Standard BankCompetition.
Legislative or regulatory responses to perceived financial and market problems could impair our
rights against borrowers.
Current and future proposals made by members of Congress would reduce the amount distressed
borrowers are otherwise contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage loans, and may limit
the ability of lenders to foreclose on mortgage collateral. If proposals such as these, or other
proposals limiting Standard Banks rights as a creditor, were to be implemented, we could
experience increased credit losses on our loans and mortgage-backed securities, or increased
expense in pursuing our remedies as a creditor.
Recent health care legislation could increase our expenses or require us to pass further costs on
to our employees, which could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and earnings.
Legislation enacted in 2010 requires companies to provide expanded health care coverage to
their employees, such as affordable coverage to part-time employees and coverage to dependent adult
children of employees. Companies will also be required to enroll new employees automatically into
their health plans. Compliance with these and other new requirements of the health care
legislation will increase our employee benefits expense, and may require us to pass these costs on
to our employees, which could give us a competitive disadvantage in hiring and retaining qualified
employees.
Any future Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance premium increases will adversely affect
our earnings. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted a rule that required us to prepay
insurance premiums.
In May 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted a final rule levying a five
basis point special assessment on each insured depository institutions assets minus Tier 1 capital
as of June 30, 2009. We recorded an expense of $177,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to
reflect the special assessment. Any further special assessments that the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation levy will be recorded as an expense during the appropriate period. In addition, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation increased the general assessment rate and our prior credits
for federal deposit insurance were fully utilized during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Therefore, our Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation general insurance premium expense will
increase compared to prior periods.
22
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also issued a final rule pursuant to which all
insured depository institutions were required to prepay on December 30, 2009 their estimated
assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. We prepaid $1.5
million of our assessments on December 30, 2009, based on our deposits and assessment rate as of
September 30, 2009.
Risks Related to this Stock Offering
The future price of the shares of common stock may be less than the purchase price in the stock
offering.
If you purchase shares of common stock in the stock offering, you may not be able to sell them
at or above the purchase price in the stock offering. The aggregate purchase price of the shares
of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation is determined by an
independent, third-party appraisal, pursuant to federal banking regulations and subject to review
by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board. The appraisal is not
intended, and should not be construed, as a recommendation of any kind as to the advisability of
purchasing shares of common stock. Following the completion of the stock offering, our aggregate
pro forma market value will be based on the market trading price of the shares, and not the final,
approved independent appraisal, which may result in our stock trading below the initial offering
price of $10.00 per share.
Our return on equity will be low following the stock offering. This could negatively affect the
trading price of our shares of common stock.
Net income divided by average equity, known as return on equity, is a ratio many
investors use to compare the performance of a financial institution to its peers. Following the
stock offering, we expect our consolidated equity to be between $64.7 million at the minimum of the
offering range and $77.2 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering range. Based upon our pro
forma net income for the six months ended March 31, 2010, and these pro forma equity levels, our
annualized return on equity would be 4.75% and 4.00% at the minimum and adjusted maximum of the
offering range, respectively. We expect our return on equity to remain low until we are able to
leverage the additional capital we receive from the stock offering. Although we will be able to
increase net interest income using proceeds of the stock offering, our return on equity will be
negatively affected by higher expenses from the costs of being a public company and added expenses
associated with our employee stock ownership plan and the stock-based benefit plan we intend to
adopt. Until we can increase our net interest income and noninterest income and leverage the
capital raised in the stock offering, we expect our return on equity to remain low, which may
reduce the value of our shares of common stock.
Our stock-based benefit plans will increase our costs, which will reduce our income.
We anticipate that our employee stock ownership plan will purchase 8% of the total shares of
common stock sold in the stock offering and issued to the charitable foundation, with funds
borrowed from Standard Financial Corp. We will record annual employee stock ownership plan expense
in an amount equal to the fair value of shares of common stock committed to be released to
employees. Assuming the employee stock ownership plan purchases 328,509 shares in the offering at
the adjusted maximum of the offering range, we will recognize additional annual pre-tax
compensation expense of $164,000 over a 20-year period, assuming the shares of common stock have a
fair market value of $10.00 per share for the full 20-year period. If shares of common stock
appreciate in value over time, compensation expense relating to the employee stock ownership plan
will increase.
Our current intention is to adopt one or more stock-based benefit plans after the stock
offering that would award participants shares of our common stock (at no cost to them) and/or
options to purchase shares of our common stock. The number of shares of restricted stock or stock
options reserved for
23
issuance under any initial stock-based benefit plan may not exceed 4% and 10%, respectively,
of our total outstanding shares, including shares issued to the charitable foundation, if these
plans are adopted within 12 months after the completion of the conversion. We may grant shares of
common stock and stock options in excess of these amounts provided the stock-based benefit plan is
adopted more than one year following the stock offering. Assuming a $10.00 per option exercise
price and an estimated grant-date fair value of the options utilizing a Black-Scholes option
pricing analysis of $2.97 per option granted, with the value amortized over a five-year vesting
period, the corresponding annual pre-tax expense associated with the stock options would be
$244,000 at the adjusted maximum of the offering range. In addition, assuming that all shares of
restricted stock are awarded at a price of $10.00 per share, and that the awards vest over a
five-year period, the corresponding annual pre-tax expense associated with restricted stock awarded
under a stock-based benefit plan would be $329,000 at the adjusted maximum. However, if we grant
shares of common stock or options in excess of these amounts, such grants would increase our costs
further. The shares of restricted stock granted under a stock-based benefit plan will be expensed
by us over their vesting period at the fair market value of the shares on the date they are
awarded.
The implementation of stock-based benefit plans may dilute your ownership interest. Historically,
stockholders have approved these stock-based benefit plans.
We intend to adopt one or more stock-based benefit plans, which will allow participants to be
awarded shares of common stock (at no cost to them) or options to purchase shares of our common
stock, following the stock offering. These stock-based benefit plans will be funded through either
open market purchases of shares of common stock or from the issuance of authorized but unissued
shares of common stock. Our ability to repurchase shares of common stock to fund these plans will
be subject to many factors, including, but not limited to, applicable regulatory restrictions on
stock repurchases, the availability of stock in the market, the trading price of the stock, our
capital levels, alternative uses for our capital and our financial performance. Although our
current intention is to fund these plans with stock repurchases, we may not be able to conduct such
repurchases. If we do not repurchase shares of common stock to fund these plans, then stockholders
would experience a reduction in their ownership interest, which would total 3.85% in the event
newly issued shares are used to fund stock options or awards of shares of common stock under these
plans in an amount equal to 10% or 4%, respectively, of the shares issued in the stock offering and
issued to the charitable foundation. We may grant shares of common stock and stock options in
excess of these amounts provided the stock-based benefit plan is adopted more than one year
following the stock offering.
Although the implementation of the stock-based benefit plan will be subject to stockholder
approval, historically, the overwhelming majority of stock-based benefit plans adopted by savings
institutions and their holding companies following mutual-to-stock conversions have been approved
by stockholders.
We have not determined whether we will adopt stock-based benefit plans more than one year following
the stock offering. Stock-based benefit plans adopted more than one year following the stock
offering may exceed regulatory restrictions on the size of stock-based benefit plans adopted within
one year, which would further increase our costs.
If we adopt stock-based benefit plans more than one year following the completion of the stock
offering, then grants of shares of common stock or stock options under our stock-based benefit
plans may exceed 4% and 10%, respectively, of our total outstanding shares. Stock-based benefit
plans that provide for awards in excess of these amounts would increase our costs beyond the
amounts estimated in Our stock-based benefit plans will increase our costs, which will reduce
our income. Stock-based benefit plans that provide for awards in excess of these amounts could
also result in dilution to stockholders in excess of that described in The implementation of
stock-based benefit plans will dilute your
24
ownership interest. Historically, stockholders have approved these stock-based benefit
plans. Although the implementation of the stock-based benefit plan will be subject to stockholder
approval, the determination as to the timing of the implementation of such a plan will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors. Our current intention is to adopt one or more stock-based
benefit plans no earlier than twelve months after completion of the conversion.
The contribution of shares to the charitable foundation will dilute your ownership interests and
adversely affect net income.
Subject to depositor approval, we intend to establish a charitable foundation in connection
with the conversion. We will make a contribution to the charitable foundation in the form of
$200,000 in cash and a number of shares of common stock with a value equal to 3.5% of the shares
sold in the offering. The contribution of cash and shares of common stock will total $1.1 million
at the minimum of the offering range, and up to $1.6 million at the adjusted maximum of the
offering range. The aggregate contribution will have an adverse effect on our net income for the
quarter and year in which we make the contribution to the charitable foundation. The after-tax
expense of the contribution will reduce net income by approximately $1.0 million at the adjusted
maximum of the offering range. We had net income of $1.5 million for the six months ended March
31, 2010 and $2.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Persons purchasing
shares in the stock offering will have their ownership and voting interests diluted by up to 3.4%
due to the issuance of shares of common stock to the charitable foundation.
We intend to enter into employment agreements and change in control agreements with certain of our
officers, all of which may increase our compensation costs or increase the cost of acquiring us.
We intend to enter into employment agreements with Timothy K. Zimmerman, our President and
Chief Executive Officer, Colleen M. Brown, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
and Paul A. Knapp, our Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Lending Officer. We also intend
to enter into three change in control agreements with certain of our other officers. In the event
of termination of employment of Mr. Zimmerman, Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp other than for cause, or in
the event of certain types of termination following a change in control, as set forth in the
employment agreements, and assuming the agreements were in effect, the employment agreements
provide for cash severance benefits that would cost up to approximately $1.5 million in the
aggregate based on the compensation information included in Management of Standard Financial
Corp.Executive Officer Compensation.
Our contribution to the charitable foundation may not be tax deductible, which could reduce our
profits.
The Internal Revenue Service may not grant tax-exempt status to the charitable foundation. If
the contribution is not deductible, we would not receive any tax benefit from the contribution.
The total value of the contribution would be $1.6 million at the adjusted maximum of the offering
range, which would result in after-tax expense of approximately $1.0 million. In the event that
the Internal Revenue Service does not grant tax-exempt status to the charitable foundation or the
contribution to the charitable foundation is otherwise not tax deductible, we would recognize
after-tax expense up to the value of the entire contribution, or $1.6 million at the adjusted
maximum of the offering range.
In addition, even if the contribution is tax deductible, we may not have sufficient taxable
income to be able to use the deduction fully. Under the Internal Revenue Code, a corporate entity
is generally permitted to deduct charitable contributions in an amount up to 10% of its taxable
income (taxable income before the charitable contributions deduction) in any one year for
charitable contributions. Any contribution in excess of the 10% limit may be deducted for federal
income tax purposes over the five
25
years following the year in which the charitable contribution was made. Accordingly, a
charitable contribution by a corporate entity could, if necessary, be deducted for federal income
tax purposes over a six-year period. Our taxable income over this period may not be sufficient to
fully use this deduction.
We have broad discretion in using the proceeds of the stock offering. Our failure to effectively
use such proceeds could reduce our profits.
Standard Financial Corp. will use a portion of the net proceeds to finance the purchase of
shares of common stock in the stock offering by the employee stock ownership plan, and may use the
remaining net proceeds to pay dividends to stockholders, repurchase shares of common stock,
purchase investment securities, deposit funds in Standard Bank, acquire other financial services
companies or branch offices or for other general corporate purposes. Standard Bank may use the
proceeds it receives to fund new loans, establish or acquire new branches, purchase investment
securities, reduce a portion of our borrowings, or for general corporate purposes. We have not
identified specific amounts of proceeds for any of these purposes and we will have significant
flexibility in determining the amount of net proceeds we apply to different uses and the timing of
such applications. Our failure to utilize these funds effectively could reduce our profitability.
We have not established a timetable for the effective deployment of the proceeds and we cannot
predict how long we will require to effectively deploy the proceeds.
Our stock value may be negatively affected by regulations that restrict takeovers.
For three years following the stock offering, federal regulations, as applied by the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board, may prohibit any person from
acquiring or offering to acquire more than 10% of our common stock without the prior written
approval of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and
the Federal Reserve Board. See Restrictions on Acquisition of Standard Financial Corp. for a
discussion of applicable regulations regarding acquisitions.
The corporate governance provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, Standard Banks
stock charter and the corporate governance provisions under relevant state law, may prevent or
impede the holders of our common stock from obtaining representation on our Board of Directors and
may impede takeovers of the company.
Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as the stock charter of
Standard Bank, may prevent or impede holders of our common stock from obtaining representation on
our Board of Directors and may make takeovers of Standard Financial Corp. more difficult. For
example, our Board of Directors is divided into three staggered classes. A classified Board makes
it more difficult for stockholders to change a majority of the directors because it generally takes
at least two annual elections of directors for this to occur. In addition, our articles of
incorporation include a provision that no person will be entitled to vote any shares of our common
stock in excess of 10% of our outstanding shares of common stock. This limitation does not apply
to the purchase of shares by a tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan established by us.
Standard Banks stock charter will contain a provision that for a period of five years from the
closing of the conversion, no person other than Standard Financial Corp. may offer directly or
indirectly to acquire the beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of equity security of
Standard Bank. This limitation does not apply to the purchase of shares by a tax-qualified
employee stock benefit plan established by us, as well as other acquisitions specified in the stock
charter. In addition, our articles of incorporation and bylaws restrict who may call special
meetings of stockholders and how directors may be removed from office. Additionally, in certain
instances, the Maryland General Corporation Law requires a supermajority vote of our stockholders
to approve a merger or other business combination with a large stockholder, if the proposed
transaction is not approved by a majority of our directors. See Restrictions on Acquisition of
Standard Financial Corp.
26
We will need to implement additional finance and accounting systems, procedures and controls in
order to satisfy our new public company reporting requirements, which will increase our operating
costs.
Upon completion of the stock offering, we will become a public reporting company. The federal
securities laws and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission require that we file
annual, quarterly and current reports, and that we maintain effective disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. We expect that the obligations of being
a public company, including substantial public reporting obligations, will require significant
expenditures and place additional demands on our management team. These obligations will increase
our operating expenses and could divert managements attention from our banking operations.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission will require us to certify the adequacy of our internal controls
and procedures, which could require us to upgrade our systems, and/or hire additional staff, which
will increase our operating costs.
We have never issued common stock and there is no guarantee that a liquid market will develop.
We have never issued capital stock and there is no established market for our common stock.
We expect that our common stock will be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the
symbol STND, subject to completion of the offering and compliance with certain conditions,
including the presence of at least three registered and active market makers. Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company has advised us that it intends to make a market in shares of our common stock following the
offering, but it is under no obligation to do so or to continue to do so once it begins. While we
will attempt before completion of the offering to obtain commitments from at least two other
broker-dealers to make a market in shares of our common stock, we may not be able to obtain such
commitments. This would result in our common stock not being listed for trading on the Nasdaq
Capital Market, which could reduce the liquidity of our common stock.
We may take other actions to meet the minimum required sales of shares if we cannot find enough
purchasers in the subscription and community offerings. Such actions may reduce the net proceeds
from the stock offering.
If we do not sell enough shares to reach the minimum of the offering range through the
subscription and community offerings, shares may be offered for sale to the general public in a
syndicated community offering to be managed by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, acting as our agent.
The fee to be paid in connection with such an offering would be higher than the fee paid in the
subscription and community offerings, which would increase the expenses associated with the stock
offering and reduce the net proceeds. Specifically, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company will receive a fee
of 1.0% of the aggregate dollar amount of the common stock sold in the subscription and community
offerings, less shares acquired by our directors and executive officers, and our ESOP as well as
the shares of common stock issued to the charitable foundation. If there is a syndicated community
offering, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company will receive a fee not to exceed 6.0% of the aggregate dollar
amount of the common stock sold in the syndicated community offering, less the amount of common
stock already sold in the subscription and community offerings.
27
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The summary financial information presented below is derived in part from the consolidated
financial statements of Standard Mutual Holding Company and subsidiaries. The following is only a
summary and you should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
beginning on page F-1. The information at September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements
of Standard Mutual Holding Company that appear in this prospectus. The operating data for the six
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the financial condition data at March 31, 2010 were not
audited. However, in the opinion of management of Standard Mutual Holding Company, all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
operations for the unaudited periods have been made. No adjustments were made other than normal
recurring entries. The results of operations for the six months ended March 31, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the entire year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
At September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Financial Condition Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
403,209 |
|
|
$ |
382,415 |
|
|
$ |
353,971 |
|
|
$ |
342,938 |
|
|
$ |
328,989 |
|
|
$ |
269,016 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
25,130 |
|
|
|
12,420 |
|
|
|
18,817 |
|
|
|
18,143 |
|
|
|
21,485 |
|
|
|
14,695 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
70,023 |
|
|
|
69,244 |
|
|
|
28,949 |
|
|
|
26,241 |
|
|
|
40,361 |
|
|
|
77,363 |
|
Securities held to maturity (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,518 |
|
|
|
27,710 |
|
|
|
34,289 |
|
|
|
42,157 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
277,148 |
|
|
|
270,769 |
|
|
|
257,551 |
|
|
|
243,742 |
|
|
|
205,653 |
|
|
|
119,288 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
|
9,080 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,805 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
311,196 |
|
|
|
286,934 |
|
|
|
254,632 |
|
|
|
263,977 |
|
|
|
262,999 |
|
|
|
199,267 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
42,078 |
|
|
|
46,618 |
|
|
|
50,948 |
|
|
|
32,809 |
|
|
|
20,727 |
|
|
|
31,274 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
3,537 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Total net worth |
|
|
43,561 |
|
|
|
42,168 |
|
|
|
38,695 |
|
|
|
39,444 |
|
|
|
37,844 |
|
|
|
36,374 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2009, all securities previously categorized as held to maturity were transferred to
available for sale. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
|
$ |
9,197 |
|
|
$ |
18,236 |
|
|
$ |
18,679 |
|
|
$ |
18,191 |
|
|
$ |
15,527 |
|
|
$ |
11,652 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
8,091 |
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
|
|
10,075 |
|
|
|
8,394 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
5,787 |
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
10,145 |
|
|
|
9,442 |
|
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
7,133 |
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
Provision for loan losses (1) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend
income after provision for
loan losses |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
|
9,045 |
|
|
|
9,126 |
|
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
7,133 |
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
8,169 |
|
|
|
8,036 |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax
expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) (2) |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
2,060 |
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies- Allowance for Loan Losses and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Allowance for Loan Losses for a
discussion of our procedures for determining the provision for loan losses. A provision for
loan losses was not recorded during the three year period ended September 30, 2007 because the
results of a comprehensive analysis of the allowance for loan losses indicated that the
allowance was at an appropriate level for each period indicated. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies
Allowance for Loan Losses and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Allowance for Loan Losses for a discussion of our procedures for
determining the provision for loan losses |
|
(2) |
|
The income tax expense and (benefit) recorded for the year ended September 30, 2009 and the
six months ended March 31, 2009, respectively was impacted by the reversal of a $510,000
valuation allowance related to impairment losses on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred
stocks. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
- Income Taxes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations Comparison Operating Results for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 Income Tax Expense. |
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Six |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
At or For the Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (ratio of net income to
average total assets) |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
Return on average equity (ratio of net income to
average equity) |
|
|
7.14 |
% |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
5.33 |
% |
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
Interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
1.98 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (4) |
|
|
60.09 |
% |
|
|
73.94 |
% |
|
|
72.83 |
% |
|
|
78.54 |
% |
|
|
75.08 |
% |
|
|
81.91 |
% |
|
|
88.69 |
% |
Noninterest expense to average total assets |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
104.70 |
% |
|
|
104.38 |
% |
|
|
104.45 |
% |
|
|
104.94 |
% |
|
|
104.94 |
% |
|
|
104.75 |
% |
|
|
109.65 |
% |
Equity to assets |
|
|
10.80 |
% |
|
|
10.77 |
% |
|
|
11.03 |
% |
|
|
10.93 |
% |
|
|
11.50 |
% |
|
|
11.50 |
% |
|
|
13.52 |
% |
Tangible equity to tangible assets |
|
|
8.60 |
% |
|
|
8.38 |
% |
|
|
8.69 |
% |
|
|
8.35 |
% |
|
|
8.81 |
% |
|
|
8.62 |
% |
|
|
13.47 |
% |
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
11.02 |
% |
|
|
11.18 |
% |
|
|
11.03 |
% |
|
|
11.59 |
% |
|
|
11.68 |
% |
|
|
11.86 |
% |
|
|
14.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
627.45 |
% |
|
|
152.31 |
% |
|
|
233.01 |
% |
|
|
150.12 |
% |
|
|
294.43 |
% |
|
|
355.80 |
% |
|
|
435.26 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios (bank level only): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
14.48 |
% |
|
|
14.29 |
% |
|
|
14.09 |
% |
|
|
14.33 |
% |
|
|
14.32 |
% |
|
|
14.90 |
% |
|
|
26.57 |
% |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
13.23 |
% |
|
|
13.14 |
% |
|
|
12.83 |
% |
|
|
13.22 |
% |
|
|
12.80 |
% |
|
|
13.14 |
% |
|
|
24.64 |
% |
Tier I capital (to average assets) |
|
|
8.44 |
% |
|
|
8.48 |
% |
|
|
8.32 |
% |
|
|
8.45 |
% |
|
|
8.27 |
% |
|
|
7.95 |
% |
|
|
12.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of offices |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Full time equivalent employees |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ratios for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the year. |
|
(3) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average
interest-earning assets for the year. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest
income and noninterest income. |
29
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The following tables set forth selected consolidated historical financial and other data of
Standard Mutual Holding Company and subsidiaries for the periods and at the dates indicated. The
following is only a summary and you should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes beginning on page F-1. The information at September 30, 2009 is derived in
part from the audited consolidated financial statements of Standard Mutual Holding Company that
appear in this prospectus. The operating data for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 and the financial condition data at June 30, 2010 were not audited. However, in the
opinion of management of Standard Mutual Holding Company, all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the
unaudited periods have been made. No adjustments were made other than normal recurring entries.
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the entire year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Selected Financial Condition Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
395,794 |
|
|
$ |
382,415 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,649 |
|
|
|
12,420 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
65,340 |
|
|
|
69,244 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
279,265 |
|
|
|
270,769 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
9,080 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
312,339 |
|
|
|
286,934 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
32,063 |
|
|
|
46,618 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
Total net worth |
|
|
44,454 |
|
|
|
42,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Selected Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
$ |
4,508 |
|
|
$ |
4,525 |
|
|
$ |
13,668 |
|
|
$ |
13,723 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
4,844 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
8,824 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
8,045 |
|
|
|
6,794 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
6,389 |
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
3,424 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
2,276 |
|
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
At or For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (ratio of net income to average total assets) |
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
Return on average equity (ratio of net income to average equity) |
|
|
6.68 |
% |
|
|
5.45 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
6.10 |
% |
Interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
Net interest margin (3) |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (4) |
|
|
60.77 |
% |
|
|
69.44 |
% |
|
|
60.32 |
% |
|
|
72.41 |
% |
Noninterest expense to average total assets |
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
2.43 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
104.44 |
% |
|
|
104.41 |
% |
|
|
104.61 |
% |
|
|
104.39 |
% |
Equity to assets |
|
|
11.23 |
% |
|
|
10.68 |
% |
|
|
11.23 |
% |
|
|
10.68 |
% |
Tangible equity to tangible assets |
|
|
9.01 |
% |
|
|
8.33 |
% |
|
|
9.01 |
% |
|
|
8.33 |
% |
Average equity to average assets |
|
|
11.15 |
% |
|
|
10.78 |
% |
|
|
11.07 |
% |
|
|
11.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
278.12 |
% |
|
|
286.50 |
% |
|
|
278.12 |
% |
|
|
286.50 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios (bank level only): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
14.85 |
% |
|
|
14.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
13.59 |
% |
|
|
13.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital (to average assets) |
|
|
8.59 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of offices |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full time equivalent employees |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ratios for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the year. |
|
(3) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average
interest-earning assets for the year. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest
income and noninterest income. |
31
Balance Sheet Analysis: June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009
Assets. Our total assets increased $13.4 million, or 3.5%, to $395.8 million at June 30, 2010
from $382.4 million at September 30, 2009. The increase was due to increases in net loans of $8.5
million, or 3.1%, and cash and cash equivalents of $7.2 million, or 58.2%. The net increase in
total assets was funded by an increase in deposits of $25.4 million, partially offset by a decrease
in Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $14.6 million.
Loans. At June 30, 2010, net loans were $279.3 million, or 70.6% of total assets, an increase
of $8.5 million from $270.8 million, or 70.8%, of total assets at September 30, 2009. This
increase was primarily due to an increase of $5.3 million in the commercial real estate loan
portfolio with the remainder of the increase in residential mortgages and home equity loans.
Investment Securities. At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 all of our investment
securities were categorized as available for sale and recorded at current fair value. We held
investment securities with an amortized cost of $63.8 million and a fair value of $65.3 million at
June 30, 2010, compared to $67.7 million and $69.2 million at September 30, 2009, respectively. At
June 30, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted of $24.5 million in U.S. government and agency
obligations, $19.0 million of mortgage-backed securities (of which $18.4 million were U.S.
government sponsored mortgage-backed securities), $18.0 million of municipal bonds, $2.7 million in
corporate bonds and $1.1 million in equity securities.
At June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, we held 13 securities and 15 securities in unrealized
loss positions of $165,000 and $246,000, respectively. The decline in the fair value of these
securities resulted primarily from interest rate fluctuations. We do not intend to sell these
securities nor is it more likely than not that we would be required to sell these securities before
their anticipated recovery and we believe the collection of the investment and related interest is
probable. Based on this analysis, we consider all of the unrealized losses to be temporary
impairment losses.
Deposits. Our deposits increased $25.4 million, or 8.9%, to $312.3 million at June 30, 2010
from $286.9 million at September 30, 2009. The increase resulted from a $16.0 million, or 14.8%,
increase in certificates of deposit and a $9.4 million, or 5.3%, increase in demand, NOW accounts
and savings accounts. The increase in certificates of deposit resulted from offering longer term
certificate products (four and five year terms) with various features that in some cases provide
options to earn higher rates in the future. The intent of offering the longer term certificate of
deposit products is to draw funds from a liquid savings account to extend the maturities of our
deposit base in anticipation of future market interest rate increases. The increase in demand, NOW
and savings accounts was due primarily to cash flows from checking accounts and a continued
customer preference for liquid money market and savings account products.
At June 30, 2010, we had a total of $124.2 million in certificates of deposit, of which $37.0
million had remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on historical experience and current
market interest rates, we believe we will retain upon maturity a large portion of our certificates
of deposit with maturities of one year or less as of June 30, 2010.
Borrowings. At June 30, 2010, our borrowings consisted of $32.1 million of advances from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and $3.6 million of funds borrowed under repurchase
agreements. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh declined $14.6 million, or
31.2%, from September 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010 due to the repayment of $19.6 million of maturing
advances partly offset by new advances totaling $5.0 million.
32
Net Worth. Net worth increased $2.3 million, or 5.4%, to $44.5 million at June 30, 2010 from
$42.2 million at September 30, 2009. The increase resulted from net income of $2.3 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2010.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
General. Net income for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $2.3 million, an increase of
$434,000, or 23.6%, from $1.8 million for the same period last year. The increase in net income
resulted primarily from a decrease of $1.4 million in total interest expense and a decrease of
$260,000 in total noninterest expenses, offset in part by increased federal and state income taxes
of $1.2 million. Total interest income remained steady at $13.7 million for each nine month
period. The provision for loan losses increased from $696,000 for the nine month period ended June
30, 2009 to $779,000 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010.
Interest
and Dividend Income. Total interest income remained unchanged at $13.7 million for each nine month
period, due to a decrease in the average yield earned on interest earning assets, which was offset
by an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets. The average yield on interest
earning assets decreased to 5.03% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from 5.44% for the
nine month period ended June 30, 2009. The average yield on all categories of interest earning
assets decreased from the previous period. Average interest earning assets increased by $26.1
million, or 7.8%, to $362.3 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $336.2
million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009.
Interest income on loans increased $67,000 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010
compared to the nine month period ended June 30, 2009. The average yield on loans receivable
decreased to 5.72% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from 6.08% for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in average yield was primarily attributable to our
variable rate loans adjusting downward as prime and short-term interest rates decreased as well as
the origination of new loans in a generally lower interest rate environment and repayment/refinance
of higher rate loans. This decrease in average yield was partially offset by an increase in the
average balance of loans receivable. Average loans receivable increased by $18.1 million, or 6.9%,
to $279.4 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $261.3 million for the nine
month period ended June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to continued loan
demand throughout our market area.
Interest income on investment and mortgage-backed securities decreased by $100,000, or 5.6%,
to $1.7 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $1.8 million for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2009. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the average
yield earned, which decreased to 3.25% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from 4.09% for
the nine month period ended June 30, 2009, due to new investments added in a lower interest rate
environment and variable rate investments that adjusted downward. Partially offsetting this
decrease in interest income was an increase in the average balance, which increased by $10.8
million, or 18.9%, to $67.9 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $57.1
million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009.
Interest income on interest-earning deposits decreased by $22,000 to $28,000 for the nine
month period ended June 30, 2010 from $50,000 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009. The
average yield decreased to 0.25% from 0.38% as a result of decreases in the overnight federal funds
rate. The average balance decreased by $2.8 million, or 15.8%, to $14.9 million for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2010 from $17.7 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009 as we
invested in loans and investment securities.
33
Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $1.4 million, or 22.3%, to $4.8 million
for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $6.2 million for the nine month period ended
June 30, 2009. This decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities to 1.87% from 2.58%, which was partially offset by an increase in the
average balance of interest-bearing liabilities. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by
$24.2 million, or 7.5%, to $346.3 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $322.1
million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in the cost of funds resulted
primarily from a decrease in the level of market interest rates which enabled us to reduce the rate
of interest paid on all deposit products. The increase in liabilities resulted primarily from
deposit growth in all of our markets.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $1.3 million, or 17.8%, to $8.8 million
for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $7.5 million for the nine month period ended
June 30, 2009. This increase in net interest income was attributable to the factors discussed
above. Our net interest rate spread increased to 3.17% for the nine month period ended June 30,
2010 from 2.86% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009, and our net interest margin
increased to 3.25% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from 2.97% for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2009.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses increased by $83,000, or 11.9%, to
$779,000 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $696,000 for the nine month period
ended June 30, 2009. The increase in the provision for loan losses during the comparative period
was due to the continued worsening economic conditions which caused a decrease in cash flows for
some commercial borrowers in industries such as residential home construction, restaurant, retail
and entertainment. These borrowers were not delinquent at June 30, 2010; however, the cash flow
trends noted indicated that special consideration in determining the loan loss provision was
prudent. Management analyzes the allowance for loan losses as described in the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCritical
Accounting PoliciesAllowance for Loan Losses. The provision that is recorded is sufficient, in
managements judgment, to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects the losses
inherent in our loan portfolio relative to loan mix, economic conditions and historical loss
experience. Management believes, to the best of their knowledge, that all known losses as of the
balance sheet dates have been recorded.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $75,000, or 4.4%, to $1.8 million for the
nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $1.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Net
securities gains increased by $139,000, due to gains of $8,000 for the nine month period ended June
30, 2010 compared to losses of $131,000 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2009. Partially
offsetting this increase, mutual fund and annuity fees decreased by $30,000, or 14.7%, to $178,000
for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $208,000 for the nine month period ended June
30, 2009, due in part to customer preferences to invest in insured investments in light of the
financial crisis.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense decreased by $260,000, or 3.9%, to $6.4 million for
the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $6.6 million for the same period in the prior year.
The largest decreases were in compensation and employee benefits, FDIC insurance premiums and
premises and occupancy costs. Compensation and employee benefits decreased by $154,000, or 3.9%,
to $3.8 million for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $3.9 million for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2009 due primarily to a higher pension plan accrual in the 2009 period. The
higher pension plan accrual was necessary due to the use of lower interest rate assumptions in
determining the related pension plan liability. FDIC insurance premiums decreased by $62,000, or
16.0%, to $326,000 for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 from $388,000 for the nine month
period ended June 30, 2009 as a result of FDIC special assessment levied on all banks as of June
30, 2009. Our FDIC special assessment was $177,000. Premises and occupancy costs decreased
$34,000 due to cost control initiatives implemented in late 2009 and early 2010. Other operating
expenses decreased $24,000 to $981,000 during the nine
34
month period ended June 30, 2010 from $1.0 million for the nine month period ended June 30,
2009 due to above mentioned cost reduction initiatives.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the nine month period ended June
30, 2010 increased by $1.1 million, compared to the same period last year. This increase in income
tax was primarily a result of an increase in income before income taxes of $1.6 million, or 86.3%,
from $1.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 to $3.4 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2010. Our effective tax rate for the nine month period ended June 30, 2010 was 33.5%
compared to a benefit of .2% experienced in the nine month period ended June 30, 2009. The reason
for the negative tax rate for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 was due to the reversal of a
$510,000 deferred tax asset valuation allowance on October 3, 2008 related to impairment losses
recognized on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred stock. A $1.5 million impairment loss on the
stocks was recognized in the year ended September 30, 2008 while the tax benefit was recognized in
the following fiscal year at the time the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2009 was enacted
which allowed banks to recognize these losses as ordinary losses for tax purposes.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of
words such as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect,
will, may and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions and expectations; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies; |
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and |
|
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. |
These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and are
inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements
are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are
subject to change. We are under no duty to and do not take any obligation to update any
forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are
worse than expected; |
|
|
|
|
competition among depository and other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or
reduce the fair value of financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets; |
35
|
|
|
changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial
institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth
opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any; |
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank
regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital
available to pay dividends; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that
we own. |
Because of these and a wide variety of other uncertainties, our actual future results may be
materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. Please see
Risk Factors beginning on page 17.
36
HOW WE INTEND TO USE THE PROCEEDS FROM THE OFFERING
Although we cannot determine what the actual net proceeds from the sale of the shares of
common stock in the offering will be until the offering is completed, we anticipate that the net
proceeds will be between $24.1 million and $33.1 million, or $38.2 million if the offering range is
increased by 15%.
We intend to distribute the net proceeds from the stock offering as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 Per Share of |
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Midpoint |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Maximum Adjusted |
|
|
|
2,550,000 Shares |
|
|
3,000,000 Shares |
|
|
3,450,000 Shares |
|
|
3,967,500 Shares (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Stock offering proceeds |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less offering expenses |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net offering proceeds (2) |
|
$ |
24,144 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
28,602 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
33,061 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
38,189 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of net proceeds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Standard Bank |
|
$ |
12,072 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
14,301 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16,531 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
19,095 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
Cash contributed to foundation |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
To fund loan to employee
stock ownership plan |
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,484 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
$ |
2,857 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
$ |
3,285 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Retained by Standard |
|
$ |
9,761 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
% |
|
$ |
11,617 |
|
|
|
40.7 |
% |
|
$ |
13,474 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
$ |
15,610 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares, which could occur due to a
15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in market
conditions following the commencement of the offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes all shares of common stock are sold in the subscription offering. |
Payments for shares of common stock made through withdrawals from existing deposit
accounts will not result in the receipt of new funds for investment but will result in a reduction
of Standard Banks deposits. The net proceeds may vary because the total expenses relating to the
offering may be more or less than our estimates. For example, our expenses would increase if a
syndicated community offering were used to sell shares of common stock not purchased in the
subscription and community offerings.
Standard Financial Corp. may use the proceeds it retains from the offering:
|
|
|
to invest in securities issued by the U.S. Government, U.S. Government agencies
and/or U.S. Government sponsored enterprises, mortgage-backed securities and equities,
collateralized mortgage obligations and municipal securities; |
|
|
|
|
to finance the acquisition of financial institutions or other financial service
companies; |
|
|
|
|
to pay cash dividends to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
to repurchase shares of our common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
for other general corporate purposes. |
With the exception of the funding of the loan to the employee stock ownership plan, Standard
Financial Corp. has not quantified its plans for use of the offering proceeds for each of the
foregoing purposes. Initially, we intend to invest a substantial portion of the net proceeds in
short-term investments, investment-grade debt obligations and mortgage-backed securities.
37
Standard Financial Corp. also intends to contribute $200,000 in cash and a number of shares of
common stock with a value equal to 3.5% of the shares sold in the offering. Initially, a
substantial portion of the net proceeds will be invested in short-term investments,
investment-grade debt obligations and mortgage-backed securities.
Under current regulations as applied by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal
Reserve Board regulations, we may not repurchase shares of our common stock during the first year
following the conversion, except to fund equity benefit plans other than stock options or except
when extraordinary circumstances exist and with prior regulatory approval.
Standard Bank may use the net proceeds it receives from the offering:
|
|
|
to expand its banking franchise by establishing or acquiring new branches, or by
acquiring other financial institutions or other financial services companies; |
|
|
|
|
to fund new loans; |
|
|
|
|
to repay borrowings; |
|
|
|
|
to invest in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, and
debt securities issued by the U.S. Government, U.S. Government agencies and/or U.S.
Government sponsored enterprises; and |
|
|
|
|
for other general corporate purposes. |
Standard Bank has not quantified its plans for use of the offering proceeds for each of the
foregoing purposes. Our short-term and long-term growth plans anticipate that, upon completion of
the offering, we will experience growth through increased lending and investment activities and,
possibly, acquisitions. We currently have no understandings or agreements to acquire other banks,
thrifts, or other financial services companies. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
consummate any acquisition.
Initially, the net proceeds we retain will be invested in short-term investments,
investment-grade debt obligations and mortgage-backed securities.
38
OUR POLICY REGARDING DIVIDENDS
Following completion of the stock offering, our Board of Directors will have the authority to
declare dividends on our shares of common stock, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements.
However, no decision has been made with respect to the payment of dividends. In determining
whether to pay a cash dividend and the amount of such cash dividend, the Board of Directors is
expected to take into account a number of factors, including capital requirements, our consolidated
financial condition and results of operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory
limitations and general economic conditions. No assurances can be given that any dividends will be
paid or that, if paid, will not be reduced or eliminated in the future. Special cash dividends,
stock dividends or returns of capital, to the extent permitted by Pennsylvania Department of
Banking policy and regulations, may be paid in addition to, or in lieu of, regular cash dividends.
We will file a consolidated tax return with Standard Bank. Accordingly, it is anticipated that any
cash distributions made by us to our stockholders would be treated as cash dividends and not as a
non-taxable return of capital for federal and state tax purposes. Additionally, pursuant to
Pennsylvania Department of Banking regulations, during the three-year period following the stock
offering, we will not take any action to declare an extraordinary dividend to stockholders that
would be treated by recipients as a tax-free return of capital for federal income tax purposes.
Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation, we are authorized to issue preferred stock. If
we issue preferred stock, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of our shares of
common stock with respect to the payment of dividends. For a further discussion concerning the
payment of dividends on our shares of common stock, see Description of Capital StockCommon
Stock. Initially, dividends we can declare and pay will depend upon the proceeds retained from
the stock offering and the earnings received from the investment of those proceeds. In the future,
dividends will depend in large part upon receipt of dividends from Standard Bank, because we expect
to have limited sources of income other than dividends from Standard Bank and interest payments
received in connection with the loan to the employee stock ownership plan. A regulation of the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking imposes limitations on capital distributions by savings
institutions. See Supervision and RegulationBanking RegulationCapital Distributions.
Any payment of dividends by Standard Bank to us that would be deemed to be drawn out of
Standard Banks bad debt reserves, if any, would require a payment of taxes at the then-current tax
rate by Standard Bank on the amount of earnings deemed to be removed from the reserves for such
distribution. Standard Bank does not intend to make any distribution to us that would create such
a federal tax liability. See TaxationFederal Taxation and State Taxation.
MARKET FOR THE COMMON STOCK
We have never issued capital stock and there is no established market for our shares of common
stock. We expect that our shares of common stock will be listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital
Market under the symbol STND, subject to completion of the offering and compliance with certain
conditions, including the presence of at least three registered and active market makers. Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company has advised us that it intends to make a market in shares of our common stock
following the offering, but it is under no obligation to do so or to continue to do so once it
begins. While we will attempt before completion of the offering to obtain commitments from at
least two other broker-dealers to make a market in shares of our common stock, there can be no
assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such commitments.
The development and maintenance of a public market, having the desirable characteristics of
depth, liquidity and orderliness, depends on the existence of willing buyers and sellers, the
presence of
39
which is not within our control or that of any market maker. The number of active buyers and
sellers of shares of our common stock at any particular time may be limited, which may have an
adverse effect on the price at which shares of our common stock can be sold. There can be no
assurance that persons purchasing the shares of common stock will be able to sell their shares at
or above the $10.00 offering purchase price per share. You should have a long-term investment
intent if you purchase shares of our common stock and you should recognize that there may be a
limited trading market in the shares of common stock.
40
HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA REGULATORY CAPITAL COMPLIANCE
At March 31, 2010, Standard Bank exceeded all of the applicable regulatory capital
requirements. The table below sets forth the historical equity capital and regulatory capital of
Standard Bank at March 31, 2010, and the pro forma regulatory capital of Standard Bank, after
giving effect to the sale of shares of common stock at a $10.00 per share purchase price. The
table assumes the receipt by Standard Bank of 50% of the net offering proceeds. See How We Intend
to Use the Proceeds from the Offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma at March 31, 2010, Based Upon the Sale in the Offering of (1) |
|
|
|
Standard Bank Historical at |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Midpoint |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,550,000 Shares |
|
|
3,000,000 Shares |
|
|
3,450,000 Shares |
|
|
3,967,500 Shares (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Assets (3) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Equity (1) |
|
$ |
43,013 |
|
|
|
10.67 |
% |
|
$ |
51,918 |
|
|
|
12.51 |
% |
|
$ |
53,588 |
|
|
|
12.84 |
% |
|
$ |
55,259 |
|
|
|
13.17 |
% |
|
$ |
57,180 |
|
|
|
13.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage capital |
|
$ |
32,365 |
|
|
|
8.44 |
% |
|
$ |
41,270 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
% |
|
$ |
42,940 |
|
|
|
10.79 |
% |
|
$ |
44,611 |
|
|
|
11.15 |
% |
|
$ |
46,532 |
|
|
|
11.56 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage
requirement (4) |
|
|
19,175 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
19,778 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
19,890 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
20,001 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
20,129 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
$ |
13,190 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
$ |
21,492 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
$ |
23,050 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
% |
|
$ |
24,610 |
|
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
$ |
26,403 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based
capital (5) |
|
$ |
32,365 |
|
|
|
13.23 |
% |
|
$ |
41,270 |
|
|
|
16.70 |
% |
|
$ |
42,940 |
|
|
|
17.35 |
% |
|
$ |
44,611 |
|
|
|
17.99 |
% |
|
$ |
46,532 |
|
|
|
18.72 |
% |
Risk-based requirement |
|
|
14,682 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
14,826 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
14,853 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
14,880 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
14,911 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
$ |
17,683 |
|
|
|
7.23 |
% |
|
$ |
26,444 |
|
|
|
10.70 |
% |
|
$ |
28,087 |
|
|
|
11.35 |
% |
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
|
11.99 |
% |
|
$ |
31,621 |
|
|
|
12.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based
capital (5) |
|
$ |
35,431 |
|
|
|
14.48 |
% |
|
$ |
44,336 |
|
|
|
17.94 |
% |
|
$ |
46,006 |
|
|
|
18.58 |
% |
|
$ |
47,677 |
|
|
|
19.22 |
% |
|
$ |
49,598 |
|
|
|
19.96 |
% |
Risk-based requirement |
|
|
24,469 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
24,711 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
24,755 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
24,800 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
24,851 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
$ |
10,962 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
$ |
19,625 |
|
|
|
7.94 |
% |
|
$ |
21,251 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
% |
|
$ |
22,877 |
|
|
|
9.22 |
% |
|
$ |
24,747 |
|
|
|
9.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of capital infused into Standard Bank: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Common stock acquired by employee stock ownership plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: Common stock acquired by the stock-based incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma increase (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro forma capital levels assume that the employee stock ownership plan purchases 8% of the
shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately following the stock offering and issued
to the charitable foundation with funds we lend. Pro forma Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) and regulatory capital have been reduced by the amount required to fund
this plan. See Management of Standard Financial Corp. for a discussion of the employee
stock ownership plan. |
|
(2) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares which could occur due to a
15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in market
conditions following the commencement of the offering. |
|
(3) |
|
Tier 1 leverage levels are shown as a percentage of average adjusted assets. Risk-based
capital levels are shown as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. |
|
(4) |
|
Required capital ratio reflects well capitalized under prompt corrective action
regulations. The current Pennsylvania Department of Banking capital requirement for financial
institutions is 3% of total adjusted assets for financial institutions that receive the
highest supervisory rating for safety and soundness and a 4% to 5% core capital ratio
requirement for all other financial institutions. |
|
(5) |
|
Required capital ratio reflects well capitalized under prompt corrective action
regulations. Pro forma amounts and percentages assume net proceeds are invested in assets that
carry a 50% risk weighting. |
|
(6) |
|
The pro forma capital increase infused into Standard Bank is the same for GAAP and regulatory
capital purposes. |
41
CAPITALIZATION
The following table presents the historical consolidated capitalization of Standard Mutual
Holding Company at March 31, 2010 and the pro forma consolidated capitalization of Standard
Financial Corp., after giving effect to the conversion and the offering, based upon the assumptions
set forth in the Pro Forma Data section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Financial Corp. Pro Forma, |
|
|
|
Standard Mutual |
|
|
Based Upon the Sale in the Offering at $10.00 per Share of |
|
|
|
Holding Company |
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Midpoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
|
Historical at March |
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
3,967,500 |
|
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
3,450,000 Shares |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deposits (2) |
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
44,983 |
|
|
|
44,983 |
|
|
|
44,983 |
|
|
|
44,983 |
|
|
|
44,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits and borrowed funds |
|
$ |
356,179 |
|
|
$ |
356,179 |
|
|
$ |
356,179 |
|
|
$ |
356,179 |
|
|
$ |
356,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $0.01 par value,
10,000,000 shares authorized; none
issued or outstanding |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Common stock $0.01 par value,
40,000,000 shares authorized;
assuming shares outstanding as shown
(3)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Additional paid-in capital (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,010 |
|
|
|
29,621 |
|
|
|
34,233 |
|
|
|
39,536 |
|
Retained earnings (5) |
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
After-tax expense of contribution to
charitable foundation (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
Common stock to be acquired by
employee stock ownership plan (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
Common stock to be acquired by
stock-based benefit plans (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
43,561 |
|
|
$ |
64,711 |
|
|
$ |
68,664 |
|
|
$ |
72,619 |
|
|
$ |
77,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued to charitable foundation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,250 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
120,750 |
|
|
|
138,863 |
|
Shares offered for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
|
3,967,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639,250 |
|
|
|
3,105,000 |
|
|
|
3,570,750 |
|
|
|
4,106,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity as a
percentage of total assets (2) |
|
|
10.80 |
% |
|
|
15.25 |
% |
|
|
16.03 |
% |
|
|
16.80 |
% |
|
|
17.67 |
% |
Tangible equity as a percent of assets |
|
|
8.40 |
% |
|
|
12.96 |
% |
|
|
13.76 |
% |
|
|
14.55 |
% |
|
|
15.44 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares of common stock that
could occur due to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for shares or
changes in market conditions following the commencement of the subscription and community
offerings. We are offering up to 3,450,000 shares of common stock for sale on a best
efforts basis. We may sell up to 3,967,500 shares of common stock because of demand for
the shares in excess of 3,450,000 shares or changes in market conditions that would
increase our pro forma market value in excess of $34.5 million (3,450,000 shares
multiplied by the $10.00 purchase price per share) without resoliciting subscribers. We
must sell a minimum of 2,550,000 shares in order to complete the offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not reflect withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purchase of shares of common
stock in the conversion and offering. These withdrawals would reduce pro forma deposits
and assets by the amount of the withdrawals. |
|
(3) |
|
No effect has been given to the issuance of additional shares of Standard Financial Corp.
common stock pursuant to one or more stock-based benefit plans. If these plans are
implemented within 12 months following the completion of the stock offering, an amount up to
10% and 4% of the shares of Standard Financial Corp. common stock sold in the offering and
issued to the charitable foundation will be reserved for issuance upon the exercise of stock
options and for issuance as restricted stock awards, respectively. See Management of
Standard Financial Corp. |
|
(4) |
|
The sum of the par value of the total shares outstanding and additional paid-in capital
equals the net stock offering proceeds at the offering price of $10.00 per share. |
|
(5) |
|
The retained earnings of Standard Bank will be substantially restricted after the conversion.
See Our Policy Regarding Dividends, The ConversionLiquidation Rights and Supervision
and Regulation. |
(footnotes continue on next page)
42
(footnotes continued from previous page)
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Represents the expense of the contribution to the charitable foundation based on a 34.2%
tax rate. The realization of the deferred tax benefit is limited annually to a maximum
deduction for charitable foundations equal to 10% of our annual taxable income, subject to
our ability to carry forward for federal or state purposes any unused portion of the
deduction for the five years following the year in which the contribution is made. |
|
(7) |
|
Assumes that 8% of the shares sold in the offering and issued to the charitable
foundation will be acquired by the employee stock ownership plan financed by a loan from
Standard Financial Corp. The loan will be repaid principally from Standard Banks
contributions to the employee stock ownership plan. Since Standard Financial Corp. will
finance the employee stock ownership plan debt, this debt will be eliminated through
consolidation and no asset or liability will be reflected on Standard Financial Corp.s
consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the amount of shares of common stock
acquired by the employee stock ownership plan is shown in this table as a reduction of
total stockholders equity.
|
|
(8) |
|
Assumes a number of shares of common stock equal to 4% of the shares of common stock to
be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation will be purchased for
grant by one or more stock-based benefit plans in open market purchases. The dollar
amount of common stock to be purchased is based on the $10.00 per share subscription price
in the offering and represents unearned compensation. This amount does not reflect
possible increases or decreases in the value of common stock relative to the subscription
price in the offering. As Standard Financial Corp. accrues compensation expense to
reflect the vesting of shares pursuant to the stock-based benefit plans, the credit to
equity will be offset by a charge to noninterest expense. Implementation of the stock
stock-based benefit plans will require stockholder approval. The funds to be used by the
stock-based benefit plans will be provided by Standard Financial Corp. |
43
PRO FORMA DATA
The following tables summarize historical data of Standard Mutual Holding Company and pro
forma data of Standard Financial Corp. at and for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and at and
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. This information is based on assumptions set forth
below and in the table, and should not be used as a basis for projections of market value of the
shares of common stock following the conversion and offering.
The net proceeds in the tables are based upon the following assumptions:
|
|
|
all shares of common stock will be sold in the subscription offering; |
|
|
|
|
160,000 shares of common stock will be purchased by our executive officers and
directors, and their associates; |
|
|
|
|
our employee stock ownership plan will purchase 8% of the shares of common stock
sold in the stock offering and contributed to the charitable foundation with a loan
from Standard Financial Corp. The loan will be repaid in substantially equal payments
of principal and interest (at the prime rate of interest, adjusted annually) over a
period of 20 years. Interest income that Standard Financial Corp. will earn on the
loan will offset the interest paid on the loan by Standard Bank; |
|
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company will receive a fee equal to 1.0% of the dollar amount of
the shares of common stock sold in the subscription offering. Shares purchased by our
employee benefit plans or by our officers, directors and employees, and their immediate
families and shares issued to our charitable foundation will not be included in
calculating the shares of common stock sold for this purpose; and |
|
|
|
|
expenses of the stock offering, other than fees and expenses to be paid to Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, will be $948,500. |
We calculated pro forma consolidated net income for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as if the estimated net proceeds we received had been
invested at an assumed interest rate of 2.55% (1.68% on an after-tax basis). This represents the
yield on the five-year U.S. Treasury Note as of March 31, 2010, which, in light of current market
interest rates, we consider to more accurately reflect the pro forma reinvestment rate than the
arithmetic average of the weighted average yield earned on our interest earning assets and the
weighted average rate paid on our deposits, which is the reinvestment rate generally utilized by
applicable regulatory authorities.
We calculated historical and pro forma per share amounts by dividing historical and pro forma
amounts of consolidated net income and stockholders equity by the indicated number of shares of
common stock. We adjusted these figures to give effect to the shares of common stock purchased by
the employee stock ownership plan. We computed per share amounts for each period as if the shares
of common stock were outstanding at the beginning of each period, but we did not adjust per share
historical or pro forma stockholders equity to reflect the earnings on the estimated net proceeds.
The pro forma tables give effect to the implementation of one or more stock-based benefit
plans. Subject to the receipt of stockholder approval, we have assumed that the stock-based
benefit plans will acquire for restricted stock awards a number of shares of common stock equal to
4% of our outstanding
44
shares of common stock at the same price for which they were sold in the stock offering. We
assume that shares of common stock are granted under the plans in awards that vest over a five-year
period.
We have also assumed that the stock-based benefit plans will grant options to acquire shares
of common stock equal to 10% of our outstanding shares of common stock sold in the stock offering
and issued to the charitable foundation. In preparing the tables below, we assumed that
stockholder approval was obtained, that the exercise price of the stock options and the market
price of the stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per share and that the stock options had a term
of ten years and vested over five years. We applied the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
estimate a grant-date fair value of $2.97 for each option. In addition to the terms of the options
described above, the Black-Scholes option pricing model assumed an estimated volatility rate of
23.90% for the shares of common stock, a dividend yield of 2.0%, an expected option life of 10
years and a risk-free interest rate of 3.84%. Because there is currently no market for our shares
of common stock, the assumed expected volatility is based on the SNL Securities index for all
publicly-traded thrift institutions and their holding companies. The dividend yield reflects the
average dividend yield for publicly traded thrifts.
We may grant options and award shares of common stock under one or more stock-based benefit
plans in excess of 10% and 4%, respectively, of our total outstanding shares if the stock-based
benefit plans are adopted more than one year following the stock offering. In addition, we may
grant options and award shares that vest sooner than over a five-year period if the stock-based
benefit plans are adopted more than one year following the stock offering.
As discussed under How We Intend to Use the Proceeds from the Offering, we intend to
contribute at least 50% of the net proceeds from the stock offering to Standard Bank, and we will
retain the remainder of the net proceeds from the stock offering. We will use a portion of the
proceeds we retain for the purpose of making a loan to the employee stock ownership plan and retain
the rest of the proceeds for future use.
The pro forma table does not give effect to:
|
|
|
withdrawals from deposit accounts for the purpose of purchasing shares of common
stock in the stock offering; |
|
|
|
|
our results of operations after the stock offering; or |
|
|
|
|
changes in the market price of the shares of common stock after the stock offering. |
The following pro forma information may not represent the financial effects of the stock
offering at the date on which the stock offering actually occurs and you should not use the table
to indicate future results of operations. Pro forma stockholders equity represents the difference
between the stated amount of our assets and liabilities, computed in accordance with GAAP. We did
not increase or decrease stockholders equity to reflect the difference between the carrying value
of loans and other assets and their market value. Pro forma stockholders equity is not intended
to represent the fair market value of the shares of common stock and may be different than the
amounts that would be available for distribution to stockholders if we liquidated. Pro forma
stockholders equity does not give effect to the impact of intangible assets, the liquidation
account we will establish in the conversion or tax bad debt reserves in the unlikely event we are
liquidated.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 Per Share of |
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Midpoint |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
3,967,500 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Gross proceeds of stock offering |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,675 |
|
Market value of shares issued to charitable foundation |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma market capitalization |
|
$ |
26,393 |
|
|
$ |
31,050 |
|
|
$ |
35,708 |
|
|
$ |
41,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds of stock offering |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,675 |
|
Less: expenses |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
24,144 |
|
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
33,061 |
|
|
|
38,189 |
|
Less: Common stock purchased by ESOP (2) |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
Less: Cash contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Less: Common stock awarded under stock-based benefit
plans (3) |
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net cash proceeds |
|
$ |
20,777 |
|
|
$ |
24,676 |
|
|
$ |
28,576 |
|
|
$ |
33,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
Pro forma income on net proceeds |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
Pro forma ESOP adjustment(2) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Pro forma stock award adjustment (3) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Pro forma stock option adjustment (4) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
|
$ |
1,541 |
|
|
$ |
1,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Pro forma income on net proceeds |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Pro forma ESOP adjustment (2) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Pro forma stock award adjustment (3) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
Pro forma stock option adjustment (4) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share (5) |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price as a multiple of pro forma net income per share |
|
|
7.94x |
|
|
|
9.26x |
|
|
|
10.64x |
|
|
|
12.20x |
|
Number of shares outstanding for pro forma net
net income per share calculations (5) |
|
|
2,433,389 |
|
|
|
2,862,810 |
|
|
|
3,292,232 |
|
|
|
3,786,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
43,561 |
|
|
$ |
43,561 |
|
|
$ |
43,561 |
|
|
$ |
43,561 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
24,144 |
|
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
33,061 |
|
|
|
38,189 |
|
Stock contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Tax benefit of contribution of charitable foundation |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
Less: Common stock acquired by ESOP (2) |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
Less: Common stock awarded under stock-based
benefit plans (3) (4) |
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
Less: After-tax effect of contribution to charitable
foundation |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity (6) |
|
|
64,712 |
|
|
|
68,665 |
|
|
|
72,618 |
|
|
|
77,165 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(9,708 |
) |
|
|
(9,708 |
) |
|
|
(9,708 |
) |
|
|
(9,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro form tangible stockholders equity |
|
$ |
55,004 |
|
|
$ |
58,957 |
|
|
$ |
62,910 |
|
|
$ |
67,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
16.50 |
|
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
|
$ |
12.20 |
|
|
$ |
10.61 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
9.15 |
|
|
|
9.21 |
|
|
|
9.26 |
|
|
|
9.30 |
|
Stock contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Tax benefit of contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Less: Common stock acquired by ESOP (2) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
Less: Common stock awarded under stock-based
benefit plans (3) (4) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
Less: After-tax effect of contribution to charitable
foundation |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity per share (6) |
|
|
24.52 |
|
|
|
22.11 |
|
|
|
20.34 |
|
|
|
18.79 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(3.68 |
) |
|
|
(3.13 |
) |
|
|
(2.72 |
) |
|
|
(2.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity |
|
$ |
20.84 |
|
|
$ |
18.98 |
|
|
$ |
17.62 |
|
|
$ |
16.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price as percentage of equity per share |
|
|
40.78 |
% |
|
|
45.23 |
% |
|
|
49.16 |
% |
|
|
53.22 |
% |
Offering price as percentage of tangible equity per share |
|
|
47.98 |
% |
|
|
52.69 |
% |
|
|
56.75 |
% |
|
|
60.86 |
% |
Number of shares outstanding for pro forma book value per
share calculations (7) |
|
|
2,639,250 |
|
|
|
3,105,000 |
|
|
|
3,570,750 |
|
|
|
4,106,363 |
|
(footnotes begin on following page)
46
|
|
|
|
|
(Footnotes from previous page) |
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares which could occur due
to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in
market conditions following the commencement of the offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes that 8% of shares of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the
charitable foundation will be purchased by the employee stock ownership plan. For
purposes of this table, the funds used to acquire these shares are assumed to have been
borrowed by the employee stock ownership plan from Standard Financial Corp. Standard Bank
intends to make annual contributions to the employee stock ownership plan in an amount at
least equal to the required principal and interest payments on the debt. Standard Banks
total annual payments on the employee stock ownership plan debt are based upon 20 equal
annual installments of principal and interest. The interest rate for the employee stock
ownership plan loan is expected to be an adjustable rate equal to the prime rate, as
published in The Wall Street Journal, on the closing date of the offering. Thereafter,
the interest rate will adjust annually and will be the prime rate on the first business
day of the calendar year, retroactive to January 1 of such year. (Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718-40 requires that an employer
record compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the shares committed
to be released to employees.) The pro forma adjustments assume that the employee stock
ownership plan shares are allocated in equal annual installments based on the number of
loan repayment installments assumed to be paid by Standard Bank, the fair value of the
common stock remains equal to the subscription price and the employee stock ownership plan
expense reflects an effective combined federal and state tax rate of 34.2%. The
unallocated employee stock ownership plan shares are reflected as a reduction of
stockholders equity. No reinvestment is assumed on proceeds contributed to fund the
employee stock ownership plan. The pro forma net income further assumes that 5,279,
6,210, 7,142 and 8,213 shares were committed to be released during the six month period.
At the minimum, midpoint, maximum, and adjusted maximum of the offering range,
respectively, and in accordance with ASC 718-40, only the employee stock ownership plan
shares committed to be released during the period were considered outstanding for purposes
of income per share calculations. |
|
(3) |
|
If approved by Standard Financial Corp.s stockholders, one or more stock-based benefit
plans may purchase an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to 4% of the shares
to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation (or possibly a greater
number of shares if the plan is implemented more than one year after completion of the
conversion). Stockholder approval of the stock-based benefit plans, and purchases by the
plan may not occur earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion. The
shares may be acquired directly from Standard Financial Corp. or through open market
purchases. The funds to be used by the stock-based benefit plans to purchase the shares
will be provided by Standard Financial Corp. The table assumes that (i) the stock-based
benefit plans acquire the shares through open market purchases at $10.00 per share, (ii)
10% of the amount contributed to the stock-based benefit plans is amortized as an expense
during the six month period and (iii) the stock-based benefit plans expense reflects an
effective combined federal and state tax rate of 34.2%. Assuming stockholder approval of
the stock-based benefit plans and that shares of common stock (equal to 4% of the shares
sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation) are awarded through the use
of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, stockholders would have their ownership
and voting interests diluted by approximately 3.85%. |
|
(4) |
|
If approved by Standard Financial Corp.s stockholders, one or more stock-based benefit
plans may grant options to acquire an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to
10% of the shares to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation (or
possibly a greater number of shares if the plan is implemented more than one year after
completion of the conversion). Stockholder approval of the stock-based benefit plans may
not occur earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion. In calculating
the pro forma effect of the stock options to be granted under stock-based benefit plans,
it is assumed that the exercise price of the stock options and the trading price of the
common stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per share, the estimated grant-date fair
value determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $2.97 for each option,
the aggregate grant-date fair value of the stock options was amortized to expense on a
straight-line basis over a five-year vesting period of the options with 25% of option
expense deductible for tax purposes. The actual expense of the stock options to be
granted under the stock-based benefit plans will be determined by the grant-date fair
value of the options, which will depend on a number of factors, including the valuation
assumptions used in the option pricing model ultimately adopted. Under the above
assumptions, the adoption of the stock-based benefit plans will result in no additional
shares under the treasury stock method for purposes of calculating net income per share.
There can be no assurance that the actual exercise price of the stock options will be
equal to the $10.00 price per share. If a portion of the shares to satisfy the exercise
of options under the stock-based benefit plans is obtained from the issuance of authorized
but unissued shares, our net income per share and stockholders equity per share would
decrease. Assuming shares of common stock used to fund stock options (equal to 10% of the
shares sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation) are awarded through
the use of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, stockholders would have their
ownership and voting interests diluted by approximately 9.09%. |
|
(5) |
|
Net income per share computations are determined by taking the number of shares assumed
to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation and, in accordance with
ASC 718-40, subtracting the employee stock ownership plan shares that have not been
committed for release during the period and subtracting non-vested stock awards granted
under one or more stock-based benefit plans. See note 2, above. |
|
(6) |
|
The retained earnings of Standard Bank will be substantially restricted after the
conversion. See Our Policy Regarding Dividends, The ConversionLiquidation Rights
and Supervision and Regulation. |
|
(7) |
|
The number of shares used to calculate pro forma stockholders equity per share is equal
to the total number of shares to be outstanding upon completion of the offering. |
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Based Upon the Sale at $10.00 Per Share of |
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Midpoint |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Adjusted Maximum |
|
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
3,450,000 |
|
|
3,967,500 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Gross proceeds of stock offering |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,675 |
|
Market value of shares issued to charitable foundation |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma market capitalization |
|
$ |
26,393 |
|
|
$ |
31,050 |
|
|
$ |
35,708 |
|
|
$ |
41,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds of stock offering |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
$ |
39,675 |
|
Less: expenses |
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
|
|
(1,439 |
) |
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
24,144 |
|
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
33,061 |
|
|
|
38,189 |
|
Less: Common stock purchased by ESOP (2) |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
Less: Cash contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Less: Common stock awarded under stock-based benefit
plans (3) |
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net cash proceeds |
|
$ |
20,777 |
|
|
$ |
24,676 |
|
|
$ |
28,576 |
|
|
$ |
33,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
Pro forma income on net proceeds |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Pro forma ESOP adjustment(2) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Pro forma stock award adjustment (3) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
Pro forma stock option adjustment (4) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
2,141 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,148 |
|
|
$ |
2,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Pro forma income on net proceeds |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
Pro forma ESOP adjustment (2) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
Pro forma stock award adjustment (3) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
Pro forma stock option adjustment (4) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per share (5) |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price as a multiple of pro forma net income per share |
|
|
11.36x |
|
|
|
13.33x |
|
|
|
15.38x |
|
|
|
17.54x |
|
Number of shares outstanding for pro forma net
income per share calculations (5) |
|
|
2,438,667 |
|
|
|
2,869,020 |
|
|
|
3,299,373 |
|
|
|
3,794,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
42,168 |
|
|
$ |
42,168 |
|
|
$ |
42,168 |
|
|
$ |
42,168 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
24,144 |
|
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
33,061 |
|
|
|
38,189 |
|
Stock contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Tax benefit of contribution of charitable foundation |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
Less: Common stock acquired by ESOP (2) |
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,857 |
) |
|
|
(3,285 |
) |
Less: Common stock awarded under stock-based
benefit plans (3) (4) |
|
|
(1,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
Less: After-tax effect of contribution to charitable
foundation |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(1,408 |
) |
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity (6) |
|
|
63,319 |
|
|
|
67,272 |
|
|
|
71,225 |
|
|
|
75,772 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(9,791 |
) |
|
|
(9,791 |
) |
|
|
(9,791 |
) |
|
|
(9,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro form tangible stockholders equity |
|
$ |
53,528 |
|
|
$ |
57,481 |
|
|
$ |
61,434 |
|
|
$ |
65,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical |
|
$ |
15.97 |
|
|
$ |
13.58 |
|
|
$ |
11.81 |
|
|
$ |
10.27 |
|
Estimated net proceeds |
|
|
9.15 |
|
|
|
9.21 |
|
|
|
9.26 |
|
|
|
9.30 |
|
Stock contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Tax benefit of contribution to charitable foundation |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Less: Common stock acquired by ESOP (2) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
(0.80 |
) |
Less: Common stock awarded under stock-based
benefit plans (3) (4) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
|
|
(0.40 |
) |
Less: After-tax effect of contribution to charitable
foundation |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma stockholders equity per share (6) |
|
|
23.99 |
|
|
|
21.67 |
|
|
|
19.95 |
|
|
|
18.45 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(3.71 |
) |
|
|
(3.15 |
) |
|
|
(2.74 |
) |
|
|
(2.38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity |
|
$ |
20.28 |
|
|
$ |
18.52 |
|
|
$ |
17.21 |
|
|
$ |
16.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price as percentage of equity per share |
|
|
41.68 |
% |
|
|
46.15 |
% |
|
|
50.13 |
% |
|
|
54.20 |
% |
Offering price as percentage of tangible equity per share |
|
|
49.31 |
% |
|
|
54.00 |
% |
|
|
58.11 |
% |
|
|
62.23 |
% |
Number of shares outstanding for pro forma book value per
share calculations (7) |
|
|
2,639,250 |
|
|
|
3,105,000 |
|
|
|
3,570,750 |
|
|
|
4,106,363 |
|
(footnotes begin on following page)
48
|
|
|
|
|
(Footnotes from previous page) |
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted to give effect to an increase in the number of shares which could occur due
to a 15% increase in the offering range to reflect demand for the shares or changes in
market conditions following the commencement of the offering. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes that 8% of shares of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the
charitable foundation will be purchased by the employee stock ownership plan. For
purposes of this table, the funds used to acquire these shares are assumed to have been
borrowed by the employee stock ownership plan from Standard Financial Corp. Standard Bank
intends to make annual contributions to the employee stock ownership plan in an amount at
least equal to the required principal and interest payments on the debt. Standard Banks
total annual payments on the employee stock ownership plan debt are based upon 20 equal
annual installments of principal and interest. The interest rate for the employee stock
ownership plan loan is expected to be an adjustable rate equal to the prime rate, as
published in The Wall Street Journal, on the closing date of the offering. Thereafter,
the interest rate will adjust annually and will be the prime rate on the first business
day of the calendar year, retroactive to January 1 of such year. ASC 718-40 requires that
an employer record compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of the shares
committed to be released to employees. The pro forma adjustments assume that the employee
stock ownership plan shares are allocated in equal annual installments based on the number
of loan repayment installments assumed to be paid by Standard Bank, the fair value of the
common stock remains equal to the subscription price and the employee stock ownership plan
expense reflects an effective combined federal and state tax rate of 34.2%. The
unallocated employee stock ownership plan shares are reflected as a reduction of
stockholders equity. No reinvestment is assumed on proceeds contributed to fund the
employee stock ownership plan. The pro forma net income further assumes that 10,557,
12,420, 14,283 and 16,425 shares were committed to be released during the fiscal year at
the minimum, midpoint, maximum, and adjusted maximum of the offering range, respectively,
and in accordance with ASC 718-40, only the employee stock ownership plan shares committed
to be released during the period were considered outstanding for purposes of income per
share calculations. |
|
(3) |
|
If approved by Standard Financial Corp.s stockholders, one or more stock-based benefit
plans may purchase an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to 4% of the shares
to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation (or possibly a greater
number of shares if the plan is implemented more than one year after completion of the
conversion). Stockholder approval of the stock-based benefit plans, and purchases by the
plan may not occur earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion. The
shares may be acquired directly from Standard Financial Corp. or through open market
purchases. The funds to be used by the stock-based benefit plans to purchase the shares
will be provided by Standard Financial Corp. The table assumes that (i) the stock-based
benefit plans acquire the shares through open market purchases at $10.00 per share, (ii)
10% of the amount contributed to the stock-based benefit plans is amortized as an expense
during the fiscal year end and (iii) the stock-based benefit plans expense reflects an
effective combined federal and state tax rate of 34.2%. Assuming stockholder approval of
the stock-based benefit plans and that shares of common stock (equal to 4% of the shares
sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation) are awarded through the use
of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, stockholders would have their ownership
and voting interests diluted by approximately 3.85%. |
|
(4) |
|
If approved by Standard Financial Corp.s stockholders, one or more stock-based benefit
plans may grant options to acquire an aggregate number of shares of common stock equal to
10% of the shares to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation (or
possibly a greater number of shares if the plan is implemented more than one year after
completion of the conversion). Stockholder approval of the stock-based benefit plans may
not occur earlier than six months after the completion of the conversion. In calculating
the pro forma effect of the stock options to be granted under stock-based benefit plans,
it is assumed that the exercise price of the stock options and the trading price of the
common stock at the date of grant were $10.00 per share, the estimated grant-date fair
value determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model was $2.97 for each option,
the aggregate grant-date fair value of the stock options was amortized to expense on a
straight-line basis over a five-year vesting period of the options with 25% of option
expense deductible for tax purposes. The actual expense of the stock options to be
granted under the stock-based benefit plans will be determined by the grant-date fair
value of the options, which will depend on a number of factors, including the valuation
assumptions used in the option pricing model ultimately adopted. Under the above
assumptions, the adoption of the stock-based benefit plans will result in no additional
shares under the treasury stock method for purposes of calculating net income per share.
There can be no assurance that the actual exercise price of the stock options will be
equal to the $10.00 price per share. If a portion of the shares to satisfy the exercise
of options under the stock-based benefit plans is obtained from the issuance of authorized
but unissued shares, our net income per share and stockholders equity per share would
decrease. Assuming shares of common stock used to fund stock options (equal to 10% of the
shares sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation) are awarded through
the use of authorized but unissued shares of common stock, stockholders would have their
ownership and voting interests diluted by approximately 9.09%. |
|
(5) |
|
Net income per share computations are determined by taking the number of shares assumed
to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation and, in accordance with
ASC 718-40, subtracting the employee stock ownership plan shares that have not been
committed for release during the period and subtracting non-vested stock awards granted
under one or more stock-based benefit plans. See note 2, above. |
|
(6) |
|
The retained earnings of Standard Bank will be substantially restricted after the
conversion. See Our Policy Regarding Dividends, The ConversionLiquidation Rights
and Supervision and Regulation. |
|
(7) |
|
The number of shares used to calculate pro forma stockholders equity per share is equal
to the total number of shares to be outstanding upon completion of the offering. |
49
COMPARISON OF VALUATION AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION WITH AND WITHOUT THE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
As reflected in the table below, if the charitable foundation is not established and funded as
part of the stock offering, RP Financial, LC. estimates that our pro forma valuation would be
greater and, as a result, a greater number of shares of common stock would be issued in the stock
offering. At the minimum, midpoint, maximum and adjusted maximum of the valuation range, our pro
forma stock offering is $25.5 million, $30.0 million, $34.5 million and $39.7 million with the
charitable foundation, as compared to $27.1 million, $31.9 million, $36.6 million and $42.1
million, respectively, without the charitable foundation. There is no assurance that in the event
the charitable foundation were not formed, the appraisal prepared at that time would conclude that
our pro forma market value would be the same as that estimated in the table below. Any appraisal
prepared at that time would be based on the facts and circumstances existing at that time,
including, among other things, market and economic conditions.
For comparative purposes only, set forth below are certain pricing ratios and financial data
and ratios at and for the six months ended March 31, 2010 at the minimum, midpoint, maximum and
adjusted maximum of the offering range, assuming the stock offering was completed at the beginning
of the six-month period, with and without the charitable foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum of Offering Range |
|
|
Midpoint of Offering Range |
|
|
Maximum of Offering Range |
|
|
Adjusted Maximum of Offering Range |
|
|
|
With Foundation |
|
|
Without Foundation |
|
|
With Foundation |
|
|
Without Foundation |
|
|
With Foundation |
|
|
Without Foundation |
|
|
With Foundation |
|
|
Without Foundation |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Estimated stock offering amount |
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
27,073 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
31,850 |
|
|
$ |
34,500 |
|
|
$ |
36,628 |
|
|
$ |
39,675 |
|
|
$ |
42,122 |
|
Estimated full value |
|
|
26,393 |
|
|
|
27,073 |
|
|
|
31,050 |
|
|
|
31,850 |
|
|
|
35,708 |
|
|
|
36,628 |
|
|
|
41,064 |
|
|
|
42,122 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
424,359 |
|
|
|
425,661 |
|
|
|
428,313 |
|
|
|
429,822 |
|
|
|
432,267 |
|
|
|
433,982 |
|
|
|
436,813 |
|
|
|
438,766 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
359,648 |
|
Pro forma stockholders equity |
|
|
64,711 |
|
|
|
66,013 |
|
|
|
68,665 |
|
|
|
70,174 |
|
|
|
72,619 |
|
|
|
74,334 |
|
|
|
77,165 |
|
|
|
79,118 |
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity |
|
|
55,003 |
|
|
|
56,305 |
|
|
|
58,957 |
|
|
|
60,466 |
|
|
|
62,911 |
|
|
|
64,626 |
|
|
|
67,457 |
|
|
|
69,410 |
|
Pro forma net income |
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
Pro forma stockholders equity per share |
|
|
24.52 |
|
|
|
24.38 |
|
|
|
22.11 |
|
|
|
22.03 |
|
|
|
20.34 |
|
|
|
20.29 |
|
|
|
18.79 |
|
|
|
18.78 |
|
Pro forma tangible stockholders equity per share |
|
|
20.84 |
|
|
|
20.79 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
|
|
|
17.62 |
|
|
|
17.64 |
|
|
|
16.43 |
|
|
|
16.48 |
|
Pro forma net income per share |
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
Pro forma pricing ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price as a percentage of pro forma stockholders equity per share |
|
|
40.78 |
% |
|
|
41.02 |
% |
|
|
45.23 |
% |
|
|
45.39 |
% |
|
|
49.16 |
% |
|
|
49.29 |
% |
|
|
53.22 |
% |
|
|
53.25 |
% |
Offering price as a percentage of pro forma tangible stockholders equity per
share |
|
|
47.98 |
% |
|
|
48.10 |
% |
|
|
52.69 |
% |
|
|
52.69 |
% |
|
|
56.75 |
% |
|
|
56.69 |
% |
|
|
60.86 |
% |
|
|
60.68 |
% |
Offering price to pro forma net income per share |
|
|
7.94 |
x |
|
|
8.06 |
x |
|
|
9.26 |
x |
|
|
9.43 |
x |
|
|
10.64 |
x |
|
|
10.87 |
x |
|
|
12.20 |
x |
|
|
12.50 |
x |
Pro forma financial ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (annualized) |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
Return on equity (annualized) |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
4.69 |
% |
|
|
4.48 |
% |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
Equity to assets |
|
|
15.25 |
% |
|
|
15.51 |
% |
|
|
16.03 |
% |
|
|
16.33 |
% |
|
|
16.80 |
% |
|
|
17.13 |
% |
|
|
17.67 |
% |
|
|
18.03 |
% |
Tangible equity ratio |
|
|
12.96 |
% |
|
|
13.23 |
% |
|
|
13.76 |
% |
|
|
14.07 |
% |
|
|
14.55 |
% |
|
|
14.89 |
% |
|
|
15.44 |
% |
|
|
15.82 |
% |
50
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section is intended to help potential investors understand our financial performance
through a discussion of the factors affecting our financial condition at March 31, 2010 and 2009,
and our consolidated results of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes to
the consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
Historically, we have operated as a traditional community savings bank. At March 31, 2010,
$139.0 million, or 49.2% of our loan portfolio, consisted of longer-term, one- to four-family
residential real estate loans, of which $98.9 million, or 71.1%, were fixed rate loans and $40.1
million, or 28.9% were adjustable rate loans. This resulted in our being particularly vulnerable
to increases in interest rates, as our interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly
than our interest-earning assets. However, in recent years, we have increased our focus on the
origination of commercial real estate loans, which generally provide higher returns than one- to
four-family residential mortgage loans, have shorter durations and are usually originated with
adjustable interest rates.
Our emphasis on conservative loan underwriting has resulted in comparatively low levels of
non-performing assets at a time when many financial institutions are experiencing significant asset
quality issues. Our non-performing assets totaled $1.7 million, or 0.41%, of total assets at March
31, 2010, compared to $2.3 million or 0.61% of total assets at September 30, 2009. We had $1.7
million of loans delinquent 60 days or greater at March 31, 2010, compared to $2.6 million of such
delinquencies at September 30, 2009. In addition, we provided $429,000 for loan losses during the
six months ended March 31, 2010 and $1.1 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
reflecting an increase in nonperforming loans, as well as a higher percentage of commercial real
estate loans relative to one- to four-family residential real estate loans, and worsening economic
conditions.
Other than our loans for the construction of one- to four-family residential properties and
the draw portion of our home equity lines of credit, we do not offer interest only mortgage loans
on one- to four-family residential properties (where the borrower pays interest but no principal
for an initial period, after which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan). We also do not
offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such as Option ARM loans, where
the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on their loan, resulting in an increased principal
balance during the life of the loan. We do not offer subprime loans (loans that generally target
borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous
charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as
evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (traditionally defined as
loans having less than full documentation). We also do not own any private label mortgage-backed
securities that are collateralized by Alt-A, low or no documentation or subprime mortgage loans.
At March 31, 2010, 95.8% of our mortgage-backed securities have been issued by Freddie Mac,
Fannie Mae or Government National Mortgage Association, U.S. government agencies or
government-sponsored enterprises. These entities guarantee the payment of principal and interest
on our mortgage-backed securities. We own $33,000 of common stock issued by Freddie Mac. During
fiscal year 2008, impairment charges totaling $1.6 million were recorded primarily relating to $1.5
million of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred stock.
51
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to operate as a profitable, community-oriented financial institution
serving customers in our market areas. We have sought to accomplish this objective by adopting a
business strategy that is designed to maintain strong capital and high asset quality. This
business strategy includes the following elements:
|
|
|
Remaining a community-oriented financial institution while continuing to increase
our customer base of small and medium-size businesses in our market area. We were
established in 1913 and have operated continuously in the Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area
since that date. In 2006, we acquired Hoblitzell National Bank, which expanded our
branch network to Bedford County, Pennsylvania and Allegany County, Maryland. We are
committed to meeting the financial needs of the communities in which we operate, and we
are dedicated to providing quality personal service to our customers. We provide a
broad range of consumer and business financial services from our ten banking offices,
and have expanded our commercial real estate staff to enhance our capacity to serve
small businesses in our market area. |
|
|
|
|
Increasing commercial real estate lending while maintaining our conservative loan
underwriting standards. Our loan portfolio balance has increased in recent years due
in part to the growth in our commercial real estate loan portfolio to $80.9 million, or
28.6% of our gross loan portfolio at March 31, 2010, from $26.5 million, or 21.0% of
our gross loan portfolio at September 30, 2005. This growth was due in part to the
acquisition of Hoblitzell National Bank, a commercial bank that emphasized commercial
real estate lending. In growing our commercial loan portfolio, we have emphasized
maintaining strong asset quality by following conservative loan underwriting
guidelines. We underwrite all of our loans in our main office to ensure uniformity and
consistency in underwriting decisions. Our non-performing assets at March 31, 2010
were $1.7 million, or 0.41% of total assets, compared to $2.3 million, or 0.61% of
total assets at September 30, 2009, and $1.8 million, or 0.51% of total assets at
September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Emphasizing lower cost core deposits by attracting new customers and enhancing
existing customer relationships. In an effort to grow our banking franchise, we have
enhanced our direct marketing efforts to local businesses and established a stronger
culture of cross-selling our products to our existing customers. In addition, we
attract and retain deposits by offering enhanced technology, such as online banking and
remote deposit capture, with a continued emphasis on quality customer service. |
|
|
|
|
Expanding our branch network, primarily through branch purchases and de
novo branching. We currently operate from ten banking offices (nine of which are full
service). We intend to evaluate additional branch expansion opportunities, primarily
through branch purchases, to expand our presence in our current market area. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuing future expansion and acquisition opportunities with the capital
raised in the conversion, although we have no current arrangements or agreements with
respect to any such acquisitions. We intend to evaluate acquisitions of other
financial institutions, as opportunities present themselves. |
52
Anticipated Increase in Noninterest Expense
Following the completion of the conversion and offering, we anticipate that our noninterest
expense will increase as a result of the increased costs associated with managing a public company,
increased compensation expenses associated with the purchases of shares of common stock by our
employee stock ownership plan, and the adoption of one or more stock-based benefit plans, if
approved by our stockholders.
Assuming that the adjusted maximum number of shares are sold in the offering (3,967,500
shares):
|
|
|
our employee stock ownership plan would acquire 328,509 shares of common stock with
a $3.3 million loan that is expected to be repaid over 20 years, resulting in an annual
pre-tax expense of approximately $164,000 (assuming that the common stock maintains a
value of $10.00 per share); |
|
|
|
|
our stock-based benefit plans would grant stock options to purchase shares equal to
10% of the total shares issued in the offering, including shares issued to the
charitable foundation, or 410,636 shares, to eligible participants, which would result
in compensation expense over the vesting period of the options. Assuming a five-year
vesting period and a Black-Scholes option pricing analysis of $2.97 per option, as
described in Pro Forma Data, the annual pre-tax expense associated with stock options
granted under the stock-based benefit plans would be approximately $244,000; and |
|
|
|
|
our stock-based benefit plans would award a number of shares equal to 4% of the
shares issued in the offering, including shares issued to the charitable foundation, or
164,255 shares, to eligible participants, which would be expensed as the awards vest.
Assuming that all shares are awarded under the stock-based benefit plans at a price of
$10.00 per share, and that the awards vest over a five-year period, the corresponding
annual pre-tax expense associated with shares awarded under the stock-based benefit
plans would be approximately $329,000. |
The actual expense that will be recorded for the employee stock ownership plan will be
determined by the market value of the shares of common stock as they are released to employees over
the term of the loan, and whether the loan is repaid faster than its contractual term.
Accordingly, increases in the stock price above $10.00 per share would increase the total employee
stock ownership plan expense, and any accelerated repayment of the loan would increase the annual
employee stock ownership plan expense. Additionally, the actual expense of shares awarded under
one or more stock-based benefit plans will be determined by the fair market value of the stock on
the grant date, which might be greater than $10.00 per share. Further, the actual expense of stock
options granted under one or more stock-based benefit plans would be determined by the grant-date
fair value of the options, which would depend on a number of factors, including the valuation
assumptions used in the option pricing model ultimately used.
We may award shares of common stock and grant options in excess of 4% and 10%, respectively,
of our shares of stock sold in the stock offering and issued to the charitable foundation if our
stock-based benefit plans are adopted more than one year following the completion of the stock
offering. This would further increase our expenses associated with stock-based benefit plans.
53
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or
discretion or make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the
carrying value of certain assets or on income, to be critical accounting policies. We consider the
following to be our critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses. We maintain an allowance for loan losses in an amount we believe
is appropriate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio at a balance sheet date.
Managements periodic determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the size and
current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, an assessment of individual problem loans and
actual loss experience, current economic events in relevant industries and other pertinent factors
such as regulatory guidance and general economic conditions. However, this evaluation is
inherently subjective, as it requires an estimate of the loss content for each risk rating and for
each impaired loan, an estimate of the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows, and an
appraisal or other estimate of the value of collateral on impaired loans and estimated losses on
pools of homogenous loans based on the balance of loans in each loan category, changes in the
inherent credit risk due to portfolio growth, historical loss experience and consideration of
current economic trends. Based on our estimate of the level of allowance for loan losses required,
we record a provision for loan losses to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate
level.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on managements current judgments
about the loan portfolio credit quality and managements consideration of all known relevant
internal and external factors that affect loan collectability, as of the reporting date. We cannot
predict with certainty the amount of loan charge-offs that will be incurred. We do not currently
determine a range of loss with respect to the allowance for loan losses. In addition, various
banking regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically
review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require that we recognize additions to the
allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time
of their examination. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment of investment
securities, securities are evaluated periodically, and at least quarterly, to determine whether a
decline in their value is other than temporary.
We consider numerous factors when determining whether potential other-than-temporary
impairment exists and the period over which a debt security is expected to recover. The principal
factors considered are (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less
than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer (and guarantor, if any)
and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry or geographic area, (3)
failure of the issuer of the security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, (4) any
changes to the rating of a security by a rating agency, and (5) the presence of credit
enhancements, if any, including the guarantee of the federal government or any of its agencies.
For debt securities, other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred if (1) we
intend to sell the security, (2) it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, or (3) if the present value of expected cash
flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. In determining the present
value of expected cash flows, we discount the expected cash flows at the effective interest rate
implicit in the security at the date of acquisition or, for debt securities that are beneficial
interests in securitized financial assets, at the current rate used to accrete the beneficial
interest. In estimating cash flows expected to be collected, we use
54
available information with respect to security prepayment speeds, expected deferral rates and
severity, whether subordinated interests, if any, are capable of absorbing estimated losses and the
value of any underlying collateral.
Deferred Tax Assets. We use an estimate of future earnings to support our position that
the benefit of our deferred tax assets will be realized. If future income should prove
non-existent or less than the amount of the deferred tax assets within the tax years to which they
may be applied, the asset may not be realized and our net income will be reduced.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. As discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial
statements, we must assess goodwill and other intangible assets each year for impairment. This
assessment involves estimating the fair value of our reporting units. If the fair value of the
reporting unit is less than its carrying value including goodwill, we would be required to take a
charge against earnings to write down the assets to the lower value.
Balance Sheet Analysis: March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009
Assets. Our total assets increased $20.8 million, or 5.4%, to $403.2 million at March 31,
2010 from $382.4 million at September 30, 2009. The increase was due to increases in net loans of
$6.4 million and cash and cash equivalents of $12.7 million or 102%. The net increase in total
assets was funded by an increase in deposits of $24.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in
borrowed funds of $4.5 million.
Loans. At March 31, 2010, net loans were $277.2 million, or 68.7% of total assets, an
increase of $6.4 million from $270.8 million at September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily
due to increase of $4.1 million in the one- to four-family residential real estate portfolio and
$4.0 million in the commercial real estate portfolio. We have continued our focus on steadily
increasing our commercial real estate loans to better diversify our loan portfolio. Partially
offsetting these loan portfolio increases was a decrease of $1.8 million in home equity loans and
lines of credit.
55
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan
portfolio at the dates indicated. We had no loans held for sale at any of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
$ |
139,018 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
$ |
134,958 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
% |
|
$ |
129,973 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
% |
|
$ |
120,914 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
$ |
97,918 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
% |
|
$ |
60,823 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
80,921 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
76,890 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
67,411 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
61,918 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
53,566 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
26,506 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
|
43,669 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
45,486 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
44,079 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
42,657 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
40,422 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
27,947 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Construction |
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
8,358 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
13,137 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
12,414 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
12,207 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
9,042 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3,378 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Other loans(1) |
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3,261 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
282,867 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
275,154 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
262,239 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
249,814 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
211,222 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
126,518 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs (fees), net |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans in process |
|
|
(2,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(3,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,078 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,580 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
277,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
270,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
257,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
243,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
205,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of automobile loans, consumer loans and loans secured by savings accounts. |
Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table summarizes the scheduled
repayments of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2010. Demand loans, loans having no stated repayment
schedule or maturity, and overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
real estate |
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
credit |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due During the
Twelve Months
Ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
$ |
4,188 |
|
|
|
5.03 |
% |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
% |
|
|
5,702 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
% |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 to 2015 |
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
% |
|
|
8,880 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
% |
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 to 2020 |
|
|
21,092 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
% |
|
|
9,965 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
15,463 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022 to 2025 |
|
|
36,213 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
18,566 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
% |
|
|
12,207 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026 and beyond |
|
|
74,652 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
31,535 |
|
|
|
6.94 |
% |
|
|
9,936 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
139,018 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
$ |
80,921 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
% |
|
$ |
43,669 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Other Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
Due During the
Twelve Months
Ending March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
2,839 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
8.13 |
% |
|
$ |
9,519 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
8.32 |
% |
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
% |
2013 |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
% |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
8.76 |
% |
|
|
10,871 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
% |
2014 to 2015 |
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
% |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
8.32 |
% |
|
|
21,600 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
% |
2016 to 2020 |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
% |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
48,105 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
2021 to 2025 |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,220 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
2026 and beyond |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
7.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,637 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,137 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
% |
|
$ |
2,989 |
|
|
|
7.99 |
% |
|
$ |
282,867 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed and Adjustable Rate Loans: |
|
The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at
September 30, 2009 that are contractually due after September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Adjustable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,543 |
|
|
$ |
37,400 |
|
|
$ |
133,943 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,183 |
|
|
|
54,177 |
|
|
|
71,360 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,833 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
10,624 |
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
172,281 |
|
|
$ |
93,608 |
|
|
$ |
265,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of automobile loans, consumer loans and loans secured by savings accounts. |
57
Investment Securities Portfolio. The following table sets forth the composition of our
investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal obligations |
|
$ |
17,253 |
|
|
$ |
17,876 |
|
|
$ |
18,066 |
|
|
$ |
18,736 |
|
|
$ |
11,666 |
|
|
$ |
11,854 |
|
|
$ |
11,500 |
|
|
$ |
12,181 |
|
U.S. government and agency obligations |
|
|
26,882 |
|
|
|
26,857 |
|
|
|
17,791 |
|
|
|
17,871 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
4,780 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
U.S. government sponsored
mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac pass through certificates |
|
|
9,639 |
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
12,466 |
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
5,835 |
|
|
|
5,759 |
|
|
|
4,120 |
|
|
|
4,045 |
|
Fannie Mae pass through certificates |
|
|
8,979 |
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
11,149 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Government National Mortgage Association pass through certificates |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
2,677 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
Private pass through certificates |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
4,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
68,681 |
|
|
$ |
70,023 |
|
|
$ |
67,681 |
|
|
$ |
69,244 |
|
|
$ |
29,398 |
|
|
$ |
28,949 |
|
|
$ |
23,828 |
|
|
$ |
26,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored
mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac pass through certificates |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,157 |
|
|
$ |
10,076 |
|
|
$ |
15,800 |
|
|
$ |
15,405 |
|
Fannie Mae pass through certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,361 |
|
|
|
9,269 |
|
|
|
11,910 |
|
|
|
11,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,518 |
|
|
$ |
19,345 |
|
|
$ |
27,710 |
|
|
$ |
27,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 all of our investment securities were classified
as available for sale and recorded at current fair value. We held investment securities with an
amortized cost of $68.7 million and a fair value of $70.0 million at March 31, 2010, compared to
$67.7 million and $69.2 million at September 30, 2009, respectively. At March 31, 2010, our
investment portfolio consisted of $26.9 million in U.S. government and agency obligations, $20.6
million of mortgage-backed securities (of which $19.7 million were U.S. government sponsored
mortgage-backed securities), $17.3 million of municipal bonds, $2.7 million in corporate bonds and
$1.2 million in equity securities.
During the six months ended March 31, 2010, gains on sales of investment securities and
mortgage-backed securities totaled $8,000. During the year ended September 30, 2009, losses on
investment securities and mortgage-backed securities totaled $597,000. Included in the losses in
the year ended September 30, 2009 were impairment losses totaling $141,000 for other-than-temporary
declines in market value on investment securities relating to financial industry common stocks.
During 2008, impairment charges totaling $1.6 million were recorded related to $1.5 million of
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae preferred stocks and $104,000 of financial industry related common
stocks. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, no securities were held in the trading
portfolio.
At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, the Company held 19 securities and 15 securities in
unrealized loss positions of $163,000 and $246,000, respectively. The decline in the fair value of
these securities resulted primarily from interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not intend
to sell these securities nor is it more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell
these securities before its anticipated recovery and the Company believes the collection of the
investment and related interest is probable. Based on this analysis, the Company considers all of
the unrealized losses to be temporary impairment losses.
59
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the investment securities
portfolio at March 31, 2010 are summarized in the following table. Maturities are based on the
final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions
that may occur. State and municipal securities yields have not been adjusted to a tax-equivalent
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year |
|
|
More than Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less |
|
|
through Five Years |
|
|
through Ten Years |
|
|
More than Ten Years |
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal obligations |
|
$ |
4,001 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
$ |
4,217 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
$ |
2,518 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
% |
|
$ |
6,517 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
$ |
17,253 |
|
|
$ |
17,876 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
U.S. government and agency obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,343 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
% |
|
|
26,882 |
|
|
|
26,857 |
|
|
|
1.77 |
% |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
3.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
U.S. government sponsored
mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac pass through certificates |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
9,639 |
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
Fannie Mae pass through certificates |
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
3,233 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
|
1,687 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
8,979 |
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
% |
Government National Mortgage Association pass through certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
% |
Private pass through certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,989 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
$ |
29,598 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
$ |
13,667 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
$ |
17,427 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
$ |
68,681 |
|
|
$ |
70,023 |
|
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
Bank Owned Life Insurance. We invest in bank owned life insurance to provide us with a
funding source for our benefit plan obligations. Bank owned life insurance also generally provides
us noninterest income that is non-taxable. At March 31, 2010, we had invested $9.2 million in bank
owned life insurance.
Deposits. We accept deposits primarily from the areas in which our offices are located. We
have consistently focused on building broader customer relationships and targeting small business
customers to increase our core deposits. We also rely on our enhanced technology and our customer
service to attract and retain deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of
interest rates and terms. Our deposit accounts consist of savings accounts, certificates of
deposit, money market accounts, commercial and regular checking accounts and individual retirement
accounts. We do not accept brokered deposits.
Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on
a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies and
market interest rates, liquidity requirements and our deposit growth goals.
Our deposits increased $24.3 million, or 8.5%, to $311.2 million at March 31, 2010 from $286.9
million at September 30, 2009. The increase resulted from a $10.7 million, or 9.9%, increase in
certificates of deposits and an $8.8 million, or 16.7%, increase in demand and NOW accounts and a
$4.4 million, or 3.6%, increase in savings accounts. The increase in certificates of deposit
resulted from offering a step-up certificate product with a tiered rate structure earned over a
four or five year time period. The intent of offering the step-up certificate of deposit was to
draw funds from a liquid savings account to extend the maturities of our deposit base in
anticipation of future market interest rate increases. The increase in demand and NOW accounts was
due primarily to cash flows from commercial checking accounts.
At March 31, 2010, we had a total of $118.9 million in certificates of deposit, of which $33.6
million had remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on historical experience and current
market interest rates, we believe we will retain upon maturity a large portion of our certificates
of deposit with maturities of one year or less as of March 31, 2010.
The following table sets forth the distribution of total deposit accounts, by account type,
for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
At September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deposit type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
$ |
125,273 |
|
|
|
40.26 |
% |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
$ |
120,896 |
|
|
|
42.13 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
118,897 |
|
|
|
38.21 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
108,176 |
|
|
|
37.70 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
5,821 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
5,415 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
% |
Demand and NOW accounts |
|
|
61,205 |
|
|
|
19.67 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
52,447 |
|
|
|
18.28 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
$ |
286,934 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deposit type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
$ |
92,705 |
|
|
|
36.41 |
% |
|
|
2.20 |
% |
|
$ |
77,311 |
|
|
|
29.29 |
% |
|
|
3.31 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
105,082 |
|
|
|
41.27 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
124,126 |
|
|
|
47.02 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
6,074 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
6,776 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
% |
Demand and NOW accounts |
|
|
50,771 |
|
|
|
19.94 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
55,764 |
|
|
|
21.12 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
254,632 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
$ |
263,977 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth certificates of deposit classified by interest rate as of
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest Rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 2.00% |
|
$ |
49,412 |
|
|
$ |
25,602 |
|
|
$ |
10,151 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
2.00% to 3.99% |
|
|
49,270 |
|
|
|
60,167 |
|
|
|
53,631 |
|
|
|
29,702 |
|
4.00% to 5.99% |
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
19,673 |
|
|
|
38,514 |
|
|
|
91,154 |
|
6.00% to 7.99% |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,897 |
|
|
$ |
108,176 |
|
|
$ |
105,082 |
|
|
$ |
124,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, by interest rate ranges, information concerning our
certificates of deposit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Period to Maturity |
|
|
|
Less Than or |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equal to |
|
|
One to |
|
|
Two to |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Two Years |
|
|
Three Years |
|
|
Three Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest Rate Range: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 2.00% |
|
$ |
21,537 |
|
|
$ |
6,248 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
20,795 |
|
|
$ |
49,412 |
|
|
|
41.56 |
% |
2.00% to 3.99% |
|
|
6,076 |
|
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
15,257 |
|
|
|
17,915 |
|
|
|
49,270 |
|
|
|
41.44 |
|
4.00% to 5.99% |
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
10,271 |
|
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
14.89 |
|
6.00% to 7.99% |
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,639 |
|
|
$ |
19,272 |
|
|
$ |
16,997 |
|
|
$ |
48,989 |
|
|
$ |
118,897 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in
amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was $32.9 million. The following table sets forth the
maturity of those certificates as of March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
2,033 |
|
Over three months through six months |
|
|
1,527 |
|
Over six months through one year |
|
|
4,769 |
|
Over one year to three years |
|
|
8,870 |
|
Over three years |
|
|
15,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
62
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Pittsburgh and funds borrowed under repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2010, we had access to
additional Federal Home Loan Bank advances of up to $92.4 million. The following table sets forth
information concerning balances and interest rates on our Federal Home Loan Bank advances at the
dates and for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
At or For the Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
42,078 |
|
|
$ |
50,919 |
|
|
$ |
46,618 |
|
|
$ |
50,948 |
|
|
$ |
32,809 |
|
Average balance during period |
|
$ |
45,947 |
|
|
$ |
50,932 |
|
|
$ |
49,353 |
|
|
$ |
44,052 |
|
|
$ |
25,783 |
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
46,613 |
|
|
$ |
50,943 |
|
|
$ |
50,943 |
|
|
$ |
50,957 |
|
|
$ |
33,680 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
Average interest rate during period |
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our
repurchase agreements at the dates and for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
At or For the Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
$ |
5,081 |
|
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
|
$ |
3,537 |
|
|
$ |
3,990 |
|
Average balance during period |
|
$ |
3,534 |
|
|
$ |
4,420 |
|
|
$ |
4,532 |
|
|
$ |
3,429 |
|
|
$ |
3,577 |
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
3,667 |
|
|
$ |
6,380 |
|
|
$ |
6,380 |
|
|
$ |
7,231 |
|
|
$ |
5,784 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
3.83 |
% |
Average interest rate during period |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
Net Worth. Net worth increased $1.4 million, or 3.3%, to $43.6 million at March 31, 2010
from $42.2 million at September 30, 2009. The increase resulted from net income of $1.5 million
for the six months ended March 31, 2010.
63
Average Balance and Yields:
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain
other information for the periods indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the
effect thereof was not material. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual
loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the table as
loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees,
discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
$ |
277,862 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
$ |
261,055 |
|
|
$ |
8,007 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
Investment and mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
68,777 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
53,041 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
Interest earning deposits |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
15,142 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
14,193 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
361,781 |
|
|
|
9,160 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
328,289 |
|
|
|
9,197 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
391,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
357,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
123,146 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
102,006 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
114,224 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
101,641 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
5,316 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
5,688 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
Demand and NOW accounts |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
53,381 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
49,837 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
296,067 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
259,172 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
3.97 |
|
|
|
45,947 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
50,932 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
|
345,548 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
1.95 |
|
|
|
314,524 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net worth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net worth |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
391,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
357,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
Net interest-earning assets (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(footnotes on following page)
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield/ Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
263,311 |
|
|
$ |
15,837 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
$ |
256,599 |
|
|
$ |
16,220 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
% |
Investment and mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
59,442 |
|
|
|
2,343 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
47,043 |
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
Interest earning deposits |
|
|
17,017 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
339,770 |
|
|
|
18,236 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
|
|
317,020 |
|
|
|
18,679 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
28,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
368,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
344,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
$ |
109,524 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
80,169 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
104,961 |
|
|
|
3,579 |
|
|
|
3.41 |
|
|
|
117,488 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
Demand and NOW accounts |
|
|
51,402 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
50,312 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
271,410 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
254,625 |
|
|
|
7,055 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
49,353 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
44,052 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
325,295 |
|
|
|
8,091 |
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
302,106 |
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
328,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net worth |
|
|
40,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net worth |
|
$ |
368,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
344,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.83 |
% |
Net interest-earning assets (3) |
|
$ |
14,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
104.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Yields and rates for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are annualized. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average
interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning
assets. |
65
Rate/Volume Analysis:
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest
income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in
rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects
attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column
represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both
rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the
changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
For the Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to |
|
|
Total Increase |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to |
|
|
Total Increase |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
(507 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
$ |
(800 |
) |
|
$ |
(383 |
) |
Investment and mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
202 |
|
Interest earning deposits |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
(837 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
Money market accounts |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Demand and NOW accounts |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
(1,476 |
) |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
General. Net income for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $1.5 million, an increase of
$256,000, or 20.0%, from $1.3 million for the same period last year. The increase in net income
resulted primarily from a decrease of $852,000 in total interest expense and a decrease of $302,000
in total noninterest expenses, offset in part by increased federal and state income taxes. Total
interest income remained steady at $9.2 million for each six month period. The provision for loan
losses decreased from $547,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2009 to $429,000 for the
six month period ended March 31, 2010.
Interest
and Dividend Income. Total interest income remained unchanged at $9.2 million for each six month
period, due to a decrease in the average yield earned on interest earning assets, which was offset
by an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets. The average yield on interest
earning assets decreased to 5.06% for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from 5.60% for the
six month period ended March 31, 2009. The average yield on all categories of interest earning
assets decreased from the previous period. Average interest earning assets increased by $33.5
million, or 10.2%, to $361.8 million for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $328.3
million for the six month period ended March 31, 2009.
Interest income on loans remained unchanged at $8.0 million for each period. The average
yield on loans receivable decreased to 5.76% for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from
6.13% for the six month period ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in average yield was primarily
attributable to our variable rate loans adjusting downward as prime and short-term interest rates
decreased as well as the origination of new loans in a generally lower interest rate environment
and repayment/refinance of higher rate loans. This decrease in average yield was partially offset
by an increase in the average balance of loans receivable. Average loans receivable increased by
$16.8 million, or 6.4%, to $277.9 million for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $261.1
million for the six month period ended March 31, 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to
continued strong loan demand throughout our market area.
Interest income on investment and mortgage-backed securities decreased by $14,000, or 1.2%, to
$1.1 million for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $1.2 million for the six month
period ended March 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in the average
yield earned, which decreased to 3.32% for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from 4.36% for
the six month period ended March 31, 2009, due to new investments added in a lower interest rate
environment and variable rate investments that adjusted downward. Partially offsetting this
decrease in interest income was an increase in the average balance, which increased by $15.7
million, or 29.7%, to $68.8 million for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $53.0
million for the six month period ended March 31, 2009.
Interest income on interest-earning deposits decreased by $16,000, or 48.5%, to $17,000 for
the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $33,000 for the six month period ended March 31,
2009. The average yield decreased to 0.22% from 0.47% as a result of decreases in the overnight
federal funds rate. The average balance increased by $949,000, or 6.7%, to $15.1 million for the
six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $14.2 million for the six month period ended March 31,
2009 as we experienced considerable deposit growth that was invested in overnight deposits until it
could be deployed into higher yielding assets.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $852,000, or 20.2%, to $3.4 million for
the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $4.2 million for the six month period ended March
31, 2009. This decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the average cost of
interest-bearing
67
liabilities to 1.95% from 2.69%, which was partially offset by an increase in the average
balance of interest-bearing liabilities. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $31.0
million, or 9.9%, to $345.5 million for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $314.5
million for the six month period ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in the cost of funds resulted
primarily from a decrease in the level of market interest rates which enabled us to reduce the rate
of interest paid on all deposit products. The increase in liabilities resulted primarily from
deposit growth in all of our markets.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $815,000, or 16.4%, to $5.8 million for
the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $5.0 million for the six month period ended March
31, 2009. This increase in net interest income was attributable to the factors discussed above.
Our net interest rate spread increased to 3.11% for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from
2.92% for the six month period ended March 31, 2009, and our net interest margin increased to 3.20%
for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from 3.03% for the six month period ended March 31,
2009.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses decreased by $118,000, or 21.6%, to
$429,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $547,000 for the six month period ended
March 31, 2009. The decrease in the provision for loan losses during the comparative period was
due to a decline in the level of delinquent and non performing loans and lower net loan
charge-offs. Management analyzes the allowance for loan losses as described in the section
entitled Allowance for Loan Losses. The provision that is recorded is sufficient, in
managements judgment, to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects the losses
inherent in our loan portfolio relative to loan mix, economic conditions and historical loss
experience. Management believes, to the best of their knowledge, that all known losses as of the
balance sheet dates have been recorded.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $76,000, or 7.1%, to $1.2 million for the
six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $1.1 million for the same period in the prior year. Net
securities gains increased by $149,000, due to gains of $8,000 for the six month period ended March
31, 2010 compared to an impairment loss of $141,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2009.
Partially offsetting this increase, mutual fund and annuity fees decreased by $70,000, or 44.2%, to
$89,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $159,000 for the six month period ended
March 31, 2009, due in part to customer preferences to invest in insured investments in light of
the financial crisis.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense decreased by $302,000, or 6.8%, to $4.2 million for
the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $4.5 million for the same period in the prior year.
The largest decreases were in compensation and employee benefits, premises and occupancy costs and
other operating expenses, partially offset by increased FDIC insurance premiums. Compensation and
employee benefits decreased by $352,000, or 12.7%, to $2.4 million for the six month period ended
March 31, 2010 from $2.8 million for the six month period ended March 31, 2009 due to a pension
plan accrual in the 2009 period. The higher pension plan accrual was due to the use of lower
interest rate assumptions in determining the related pension plan liability. Premises and
occupancy costs decreased $34,000 due to cost control initiatives implemented in late 2009 and
early 2010. Other operating expenses decreased $46,000, or 6.7%, to $645,000 during the six month
period ended March 31, 2010 from $691,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 due to
above mentioned cost reduction initiatives. FDIC insurance premiums increased by $114,000, or
112%, to $216,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 from $102,000 for the six month
period ended March 31, 2009 as a result of increased FDIC assessment rates.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the six month period ended March 31, 2010
increased by $1.1 million, compared to the same period last year. This increase in income tax was
primarily a result of an increase in income before income taxes of $1.3 million, or 127%, from $1.0
68
million for the six months ended March 31, 2009 to $2.3 million for the six months ended March 31,
2010. Our effective tax rate for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 was 34.2% compared to a
benefit of (24.7%) experienced in the same period last year. The reason for the negative tax rate
for the six months ended March 31, 2009 was due to the reversal of a $510,000 valuation allowance
on October 3, 2008 related to impairment losses recognized on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred
stock. The $1.5 million impairment loss on the stocks was recognized in the year ended September
30, 2008 while the tax benefit was recognized in the following year at the time the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2009 was enacted which allowed banks to recognize these losses as
ordinary losses for tax purposes.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
General. Net income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 was $2.1 million, an
increase of $1.0 million, or 88.1%, from $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
The increase in net income resulted primarily from an increase in net interest income of $703,000,
an increase in noninterest income of $839,000 and a decrease in income tax expense of $775,000,
partially offset by an increase in provision for loan losses of $784,000, and an increase in
noninterest expenses of $529,000.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $703,000, or 7.4%, to $10.1 million for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $9.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Our net interest rate spread and net interest rate margin were 2.88% and 2.99%, respectively
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared to 2.83% and 2.98% for the fiscal year 2008.
Interest and Dividend Income. Total interest income decreased $443,000, or 2.4% ,to $18.2
million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $18.7 million due to a decrease in the
average yield earned on interest earning assets, which was offset by an increase in the average
balance of interest earning assets. The average yield on interest earning assets decreased to
5.37% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from 5.89% for the fiscal year 2008. The
average yield on all categories of interest earning assets decreased from the previous period.
Average interest earning assets increased by $22.7 million, or 7.2%, to $339.8 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $317.0 million for the fiscal year 2008.
Interest income on loans decreased $383,000, or 2.4%, to $15.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 from $16.2 million for fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The average
yield on loans receivable decreased to 6.01% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
6.32% for the fiscal year 2008. The decrease in average yield was primarily attributable to our
variable rate loans adjusting downward as prime and short-term interest rates decreased as well as
the origination of new loans in a generally lower interest rate environment and repayment/refinance
of higher rate loans. This decrease in average yield was partially offset by an increase in the
average balance of loans receivable. Average loans receivable increased by $6.7 million, or 2.6%,
to $263.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $256.6 million for the fiscal
year 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to continued strong loan demand throughout our
market area.
Interest income on investment and mortgage-backed securities increased by $202,000, or 9.4%,
to $2.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $2.1 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008. This increase was due primarily to an increase in the average balance,
which increased by $12.4 million, or 26.4%, to $59.4 million for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2009 from $47.0 million for the fiscal year 2008. Partially offsetting this increase in
interest income was a decrease in the average yield earned, which decreased to 3.94% for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009 from 4.55% for the fiscal year 2008, due to new investments added in
a lower interest rate environment and variable rate investments that adjusted downward.
69
Interest income on interest-earning deposits decreased by $262,000, or 82.4%, to $56,000 for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $318,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. The average yield decreased to 0.33% from 2.38% as a result of decreases in the overnight
federal funds rate. The average balance increased by $3.6 million, or 27.2%, to $17.0 million for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $13.4 million for the fiscal year 2008 as we
experienced considerable deposit growth that was invested in overnight deposits until it could be
deployed into higher yielding assets.
Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $1.1 million, or 12.4%, to $8.1 million
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $9.2 million for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2008. This decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the average cost of
interest-bearing liabilities to 2.49% from 3.06%, which was partially offset by an increase in the
average balance of interest-bearing liabilities. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by
$23.2 million, or 7.8%, to $325.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $302.1
million for the fiscal year 2008.
Interest expense on deposits decreased by $1.3 million, or 18.5%, to $5.8 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $7.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. This was primarily the result of a decrease in interest expense on certificates of deposit
of $1.4 million, or 28.7%. A decrease in the level of market interest rates enabled us to reduce
the rate of interest paid on deposit products. Partially offsetting this decrease in interest
expense was an increase in the average balance of savings accounts which increased $29.4 million,
or 36.6%, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $80.2 for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008.
Partially offsetting the decrease in interest expense was an increase in interest expense on
Federal Home Loan Bank advances, which increased $153,000, or 7.2%, to $2.3 million for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009 from $2.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. We
increased our average balance of advances outstanding to take advantage of low borrowing costs as a
result of the low level of market interest rates.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses increased by $784,000, or 248%, to
$1.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $316,000 for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008. The increase in the provision for loan losses was due to an increase in the
level of total nonperforming assets, which increased $502,000, or 27.6%, to $2.3 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $1.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Management analyzes the allowance for loan losses as described in the section entitled
Allowance for Loan Losses. The provision that is recorded is sufficient, in managements
judgment, to bring the allowance for loan losses to a level that reflects the losses inherent in
our loan portfolio relative to loan mix, economic conditions and historical loss experience.
Management believes, to the best of their knowledge, that all known losses as of the balance sheet
dates have been recorded.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $839,000, or 87.5%, to $1.8 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $959,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Net securities losses decreased $989,000, or 62.4%, to $597,000 for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2009 from $1.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. During the 2009 fiscal
year losses on sales of investments securities totaled $456,000. In addition, impairment losses
totaling $141,000 were recorded for other-than-temporary declines in market value on investment
securities relating to financial industry common stocks. During the 2008 fiscal year impairment
charges totaling $1.6 million were recorded related to $1.5 million of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
preferred stocks, and $104,000 of financial industry related stocks. Partially offsetting this
change, mutual fund and annuity fees decreased by $69,000, or 22.3%, to $240,000 for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009 from $309,000 for the
70
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, due in part to customer preferences to invest in insured
investments in light of the financial crisis.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased by $529,000, or 6.5%, to $8.7 million for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $8.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. The largest increases were in compensation and employee benefits and FDIC insurance
premiums. Compensation and employee benefits increased by $239,000, or 5.0%, to $5.1 million for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from $4.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. The increase is due to normal salary increases and increased medical insurance costs. FDIC
insurance premiums increased by $464,000 to $497,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
from $33,000 in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. This increase was the result of
increased FDIC insurance premiums and the FDICs special assessment levied on all banks as of June
30, 2009. Our FDIC special assessment was $177,000.
Income Tax Expense. The provision for income taxes for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009 decreased by $775,000, compared to the prior year. This decrease in income tax was primarily
a result of the reversal of a $510,000 valuation allowance on October 3, 2008 related to impairment
losses recognized on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preferred stock. The $1.5 million impairment loss
on the stocks was recognized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 while the tax benefit was
recognized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
of 2009 was enacted in the 2009 fiscal year, which allowed banks to recognize these losses as
ordinary loss for tax purposes.
Non-Performing and Problem Assets
When a residential mortgage loan, home equity loan or line of credit or consumer loan is 15
days past due, we send a late notice and contact the borrower to inquire as to why the loan is past
due. When a loan is 30 days or more past due, we mail a second late notice and attempt additional
personal, direct contact with the borrower to determine the reason for the delinquency and
establish the procedures by which the borrower will bring the loan current. When the loan is 45
days past due, we explore the customers issues and repayment options and inspect the collateral.
In addition, when a loan reaches 90 days past due, our management determines and recommends to our
Board of Directors whether to initiate foreclosure proceedings, which will be initiated by counsel
if the loan is not brought current. Procedures for avoiding foreclosure can include restructuring
the loan in a manner that provides concessions to the borrower to facilitate payment.
Commercial business loans and commercial real estate loans are generally handled in the same
manner as the loans discussed above. Additionally, when a loan is 30 days past due, we contact the
borrower, visually inspect the property(ies) and inquire of the principals the status of the loan
and what actions are being implemented to bring the loan current. Depending on the type of loan,
the borrowers cash flow statements, internal financial statements, tax returns, rent rolls, new or
updated independent appraisals, online databases and other relevant information in Bank and
third-party loan reviews are analyzed to help determine a course of action. In addition, legal
counsel is consulted and an approach for resolution is determined and aggressively pursued.
Loans are placed on non-accrual status when payment of principal or interest is 90 days or
more delinquent. Loans are also placed on non-accrual status if collection of principal or
interest in full is in doubt. When loans are placed on a non-accrual status, unpaid accrued
interest is fully reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received. The loan
may be returned to accrual status if payments are brought to less than 90 days delinquent and full
payment of principal and interest is expected.
71
Impaired loans are commercial and commercial real estate loans for which it is probable that
we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. We individually evaluate such loans for impairment rather than aggregate loans by major
risk classifications. The definition of impaired loans is not the same as the definition of
non-accrual loans, although the two categories overlap. We may choose to place a loan on
non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying
the loan as impaired. Factors considered in determining impairment include payment status and
collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of impaired loans is determined by the
difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using current
interest rates, and its recorded value. In the case of collateralized loans, the impairment is the
difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan. When
foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.
Mortgage loans on one- to-four-family properties, home equity loans and lines of credit and
consumer loans are large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans and are measured for
impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as
less than 90 days, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the
significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrowers prior
payment record and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the
dates indicated. At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we had no
troubled debt restructurings (loans for which a portion of interest or principal has been forgiven
and loans modified at interest rates materially less than current market rates).
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
$ |
1,600 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or greater and
still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or
greater and still accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreclosed real estate |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
879 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.41 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of automobile loans, consumer loans and loans
secured by savings accounts. |
73
Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our
loan portfolio delinquencies at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Delinquent For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days and Over |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
895 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
$ |
2,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
1,600 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
2,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
566 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
$ |
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Home equity loans and lines of
credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of automobile loans, consumer loans and loans secured by savings accounts. |
74
Foreclosed Real Estate. Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed
in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. When property is acquired it is
recorded at estimated fair value at the date of foreclosure less the cost to sell, establishing a
new cost basis. Estimated fair value generally represents the sale price a buyer would be willing
to pay on the basis of current market conditions, including normal terms from other financial
institutions. Holding costs and declines in estimated fair market value result in charges to
expense after acquisition. At March 31, 2010, we had foreclosed real estate of $1.1 million, and
at September 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we had foreclosed real estate of $1.0 million,
$205,000, $70,000, $117,000 and $0, respectively. Foreclosed real estate at March 31, 2010
consisted of four residential real estate properties, two of which, totaling $860,000, were located
in a lake resort area in Maryland.
Classification of Assets. Our policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for
the classification of loans and other assets that are considered to be of lesser quality as
substandard, doubtful, or loss assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged,
if any. Substandard assets include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we
will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have
all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that
the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets)
classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their
continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to warrant
classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that
deserve our close attention, are required to be designated as special mention. If our concerns
about loans in the special mention category increase as to the ability of the borrower to comply
with current loan repayment terms, the loan is reclassified to one of the aforementioned
categories.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses at an amount estimated to equal all credit losses
incurred in our loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate at a balance sheet
date. Our determination as to the classification of our assets is subject to review by our
principal federal regulator, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and our State regulator,
the Pennsylvania Department of Banking. We regularly review our asset portfolio to determine
whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.
The following table sets forth our amounts of classified assets and criticized assets
(classified assets and loans designated as special mention) as of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Classified assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
$ |
1,806 |
|
|
$ |
2,497 |
|
|
$ |
1,819 |
|
Doubtful |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total classified assets |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
Special mention |
|
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
5,929 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total criticized assets |
|
$ |
8,889 |
|
|
$ |
8,430 |
|
|
$ |
5,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, total criticized assets consisted of $550,000 of non-accrual loans
(consisting of $284,000 residential real estate and home equity loans and lines of credit; $261,000
commercial loans; $5,000 consumer loans), $1.1 million of foreclosed real estate and $7.1 million
of performing loans that were considered special mention. At September 30, 2009, criticized assets
consisted of $1.3 million non-accrual loans (consisting of $902,000 residential and home equity
loans and lines of credit; $415,000
75
commercial real estate loans; $4,000 consumer loans), $1.0 million of real estate owned and $5.9
million of non-performing loans that were considered special mention.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We provide for loan losses based upon the consistent application of our documented allowance
for loan loss methodology. All loan losses are charged to the allowance for loan losses and all
recoveries are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are provided by charges
to income based on various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current recognition in
estimating probable losses. We regularly review the loan portfolio and make provisions for loan
losses in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with GAAP. The allowance
for loan losses consists primarily of two components:
|
(1) |
|
specific allowances established for impaired loans (as defined by GAAP). The
amount of impairment provided for as a specific allowance is represented by the
deficiency, if any, between the estimated fair value of the loan, or the loans
observable market price, if any, or the underlying collateral, if the loan is
collateral dependent, and the carrying value of the loan. Impaired loans for which the
estimated fair value of the loan, or the loans observable market price or the fair
value of the underlying collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent, exceeds the
carrying value of the loan are not considered in establishing specific allowances for
loan losses; and |
|
|
(2) |
|
general allowances established for loan losses on a portfolio basis for loans
that do not meet the definition of impaired loans. The portfolio is grouped into
similar risk characteristics, primarily loan type and regulatory classification. We
apply an estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates applied are based upon
our loss experience adjusted, as appropriate, for the environmental factors discussed
below. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates
that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and
real estate market conditions. |
Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have
established, which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.
The adjustments to historical loss experience are based on our evaluation of several
qualitative and environmental factors, including:
|
|
|
changes in any concentration of credit (including, but not limited to,
concentrations by geography, industry or collateral type); |
|
|
|
|
changes in the number and amount of non-accrual loans, criticized loans
and past due loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in national, state and local economic trends; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the types of loans in the loan portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience and ability of personnel and management in the
mortgage loan origination and loan servicing departments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent
loans; |
76
|
|
|
changes in lending strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in lending policies and procedures. |
In addition, we may establish an unallocated allowance to provide for probable losses that have
been incurred as of the reporting date but are not reflected in the allocated allowance.
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based upon the combined total of the specific and
general components. Generally when the loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, the
allowance for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of estimated probable losses
than would be the case without the increase. Generally when the loan portfolio decreases, absent
other factors, the allowance for loan loss methodology results in a lower dollar amount of
estimated probable losses than would be the case without the decrease.
Commercial real estate loans generally have greater credit risks compared to the one- to
four-family residential mortgage loans we originate, as they typically involve larger loan balances
concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment
experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful
operation of the related business and thus may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions
in the real estate market and in the general economy.
Commercial business loans generally have greater credit risks compared to the one- to
four-family residential mortgage loans we originate, as they typically involve larger loan balances
concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment
experience on commercial business loans typically depends on the successful operation of the
related business and thus may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real
estate market and in the general economy.
At March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no loans considered to be
impaired. See Non-Performing and Problem Assets for a more detailed discussion of impaired
loans. There were no loans in arrears 90 days or more still accruing interest. Loans in arrears
90 days or more or in process of foreclosure (non-accrual loans) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans |
|
Amount |
|
Percentage of Loans Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
At March 31, 2010
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
% |
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
At September 30, 2008
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
% |
Total interest income which would have been recognized had these loans paid in accordance
with their contractual terms and actual interest income recognized on these loans as of the period
indicated are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
For the Years Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income that
would have been
recognized |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
Interest income recognized |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income foregone |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Generally, we underwrite commercial real estate loans and residential real estate loans
at a loan-to-value ratio of 80% or less. See Non-Performing and Problem Assets for a
discussion of steps taken when loans become past due.
We evaluate the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis and the allowance is adjusted accordingly.
While we use the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the information used in making
the evaluations. In addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the Pennsylvania
Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will periodically review the
allowance for loan losses. The Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based on their
analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination.
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
At or For the Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans (1) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(448 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Adjustment (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
3,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average
loans outstanding
(annualized) |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans at end
of period |
|
|
627.45 |
% |
|
|
152.31 |
% |
|
|
233.01 |
% |
|
|
150.12 |
% |
|
|
294.43 |
% |
|
|
355.80 |
% |
|
|
435.26 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to
total loans at end of period |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of automobile loans, consumer loans and loans secured by savings accounts. |
|
(2) |
|
Addition to allowance as a result of the acquisition of Hoblitzell National Bank in 2006. |
Our experience with amounts charged-off tracks closely with the difference between the
carrying value at the time of default and the fair value of collateral as determined by appraisal,
less applicable selling costs. For additional information with respect to the portions of the
allowance for loan losses attributable to our loan classifications, see Allocation of Allowance
for Loan Losses. For additional information with respect to non-performing loans and delinquent
loans, see Non-Performing and Problem Assets and Non-Performing and Problem
AssetsDelinquent Loans.
78
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allowance for
loan losses allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at
the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily
indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the
allowance to absorb losses in other categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, |
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
Commercial (2) |
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
Other loans (3) |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance |
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
2,426 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,451 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,281 |
|
|
|
75.6 |
% |
Commercial (2) |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
Other loans (3) |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes one- to four-family residential, home equity loans and lines of credit and residential
construction loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes commercial real estate and commercial loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Consists of automobile loans, consumer loans and loans secured by savings accounts. |
The increase in the allowance attributable to the commercial loan portfolio between
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009 was related both to the size of this portfolio as well as
to the amount of commercial real estate loans designated as nonperforming and criticized loans as
of September 30, 2009. See Non-Performing and Problem AssetsClassification of Assets.
Management of Market Risk
General. Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk because, as a
financial institution, the majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in
interest rates. Therefore, a principal part of our operations is to manage interest rate risk and
limit the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Our Board of
Directors has established an Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is responsible for
evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level
of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity
and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by
the Board of Directors.
Historically, we operated as a traditional savings bank. Therefore, the majority of our
assets consist of longer-term, fixed rate residential mortgage loans and mortgage backed
securities, which we funded primarily with checking and savings accounts and short-term borrowings.
In an effort to improve our earnings and to decrease our exposure to interest rate risk, we
generally sell fixed rate residential
79
loans with a term over 15 years. In addition, we have shifted our focus to originating more
commercial real estate loans, which generally have shorter maturities than one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans, and are usually originated with adjustable interest rates.
In addition to the above strategies with respect to our lending activities, we have used the
following strategies to reduce our interest rate risk:
|
|
|
increasing our personal and business checking accounts, which are less
rate-sensitive than certificates of deposit and which provide us with a stable,
low-cost source of funds; |
|
|
|
|
repaying short-term borrowings; and |
|
|
|
|
maintaining relatively high levels of capital. |
We have not conducted hedging activities, such as engaging in futures, options or swap
transactions, or investing in high-risk mortgage derivatives, such as collateralized mortgage
obligation residual interests, real estate mortgage investment conduit residual interests or
stripped mortgage backed securities.
In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the fair values of our financial
instruments. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, decreases in market interest rates
were the primary factors in the increases in the fair values of our loans, deposits and Federal
Home Loan Bank advances. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Notes to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Net Portfolio Value. The table below sets forth, as of March 31, 2010, the estimated changes
in our net portfolio value (NPV) that would result from the designated instantaneous changes in
the interest rate yield curve. The NPV is the difference between the present value of an
institutions assets and liabilities (the institutions net portfolio value or NPV) would change
in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. The simulation model uses a
discounted cash flow analysis and an option-based pricing approach to measure the interest rate
sensitivity of net portfolio value. Historically, the model estimated the economic value of each
type of asset, liability and off-balance sheet contract using the current interest rate yield curve
with instantaneous increases or decreases of 100 to 300 basis points in 100 basis point increments.
A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An
increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the
Change in Interest Rates column below. Given the current relatively low level of market interest
rates, an NPV calculation for an interest rate decrease of greater than 100 basis points has not
been prepared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV as a Percentage of Present Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Assets (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Increase (Decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Change in Interest |
|
Estimated |
|
|
NPV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Rates (basis points) (1) |
|
NPV (2) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
NPV Ratio (4) |
|
|
(basis points) |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+300 |
|
|
$ |
47,200 |
|
|
$ |
(4,677 |
) |
|
|
(9.02 |
)% |
|
|
12.14 |
% |
|
|
(54 |
) |
+200 |
|
|
|
49,323 |
|
|
|
(2,554 |
) |
|
|
(4.92 |
) |
|
|
12.47 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
+100 |
|
|
|
51,112 |
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(1.47 |
) |
|
|
12.70 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
0 |
|
|
|
51,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
|
48,775 |
|
|
|
(3,102 |
) |
|
|
(5.98 |
) |
|
|
11.83 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes interest rate changes (up and down) in increments of 100 basis points. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets and liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash flows on
interest-earning assets. |
|
(4) |
|
NPV Ratio represents NPV divided by the present value of assets. |
80
The table above indicates that at March 31, 2010, in the event of a 200 basis point
increase in interest rates, we would experience a 4.92% decrease in net portfolio value. In the
event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 5.98% decrease in net
portfolio value.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in determining interest rate risk
through changes in net portfolio value. Modeling changes in net portfolio value require making
certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs, or
loan repayments and deposit decay, respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard,
the net portfolio value tables presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive
assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being
measured and assume that a particular change in interest rates is reflected across the yield curve
regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although
the net portfolio value tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a
particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise
forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest income and will
differ from actual results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations. Our primary
sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Pittsburgh, repurchase agreements and maturities, principal repayments and the sale of
available-for-sale securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities
are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by
general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Our Asset/Liability Management
Committee, under the direction of our Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and
monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists
for meeting the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated
contingencies. We believe that we have enough sources of liquidity to satisfy our short- and
long-term liquidity needs as of March 31, 2010. We anticipate that we will maintain higher
liquidity levels following the completion of the stock offering.
We regularly monitor and adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of:
(i) expected loan demand;
(ii) expected deposit flows and borrowing maturities;
(iii) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities; and
(iv) the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits and short-term securities
and are also used to pay off short-term borrowings.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The level of these assets is dependent
on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At March
31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents totaled $25.1 million.
Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing
activities as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
81
At March 31, 2010, we had $14.4 million in loan commitments outstanding, $12.5 million of
which were for commercial real estate loans and $1.9 million of which were for one- to four-family
loans. In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $13.0 million in unused lines of
credit to borrowers and $2.2 million in undisbursed funds for construction loans in process.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of March 31, 2010 totaled $33.6 million, or 10.8% of
total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we may be required to seek other sources
of funds, including loan and securities sales, repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank
advances. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on our deposits
or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before March 31,
2011. We believe, however, based on historical experience and current market interest rates, that
we will retain upon maturity a large portion of our certificates of deposit with maturities of one
year or less as of March 31, 2011.
Our primary investing activity is originating loans. During the six months ended March 31,
2010 and fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we originated $32.3 million, $67.1 million
and $65.1 million of loans, respectively. During these periods, we purchased $22.1 million, $40.4
million and $7.0 million of securities, respectively.
Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and Federal Home Loan
Bank advances. We experienced a net increase in deposits of $24.3 million and $32.3 million during
the six months ended March 31, 2010 and for the year ended September 30, 2009, compared to a net
decrease in total deposits of $9.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Deposit
flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered
by us and our local competitors, and by other factors.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. If we
require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which provides an additional source of funds. We also
utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase (with customers) as another borrowing
source. Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased by $4.5 million and $4.3 for the six months
ended March 31, 2010 and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to an
increase of $18.1million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. At March 31, 2010, we had
the ability to borrow up to an additional $92.4 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Pittsburgh. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased by $961,000 during the six
months ended March 31, 2010 and increased $329,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
compared to a decrease of $454,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.
Standard Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based
capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a
framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance
sheet items to broad risk categories. At June 30, 2010, Standard Bank exceeded all regulatory
capital requirements. Standard Bank is considered well capitalized under regulatory guidelines.
See Supervision and RegulationBanking RegulationCapital Requirements and Note 10 of the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net proceeds from the stock offering will significantly increase our liquidity and capital
resources. Over time, the initial level of liquidity will be reduced as net proceeds from the
stock offering are used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of loans. Our
financial condition and results of operations will be enhanced by the net proceeds from the stock
offering, resulting in increased net interest-earning assets and net interest income. However, due
to the increase in equity resulting from the net proceeds raised in the stock offering, our return
on equity will be adversely affected following the stock offering.
82
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial
instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of
credit. While these contractual obligations represent our potential future cash requirements, a
significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such
commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make.
In addition, we enter into commitments to sell mortgage loans. For additional information, see
Note 12 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain
contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment,
agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities and agreements with respect to
investments.
The following table summarizes our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations
and other funding needs by payment date at March 31, 2010. The payment amounts represent those
amounts due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts or other
similar carrying amount adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or |
|
|
one year to |
|
|
three years to |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
less |
|
|
three years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
12,254 |
|
|
$ |
20,366 |
|
|
$ |
9,400 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
42,078 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
33,639 |
|
|
|
36,269 |
|
|
|
35,418 |
|
|
|
13,571 |
|
|
|
118,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
48,834 |
|
|
$ |
56,707 |
|
|
$ |
44,869 |
|
|
$ |
13,629 |
|
|
$ |
164,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
29,585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Accounting for Transfer of Financial Assets.
ASU 2009-16 provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and
comparability of the information that an entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Standard Financial Corp. is currently
evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on Standard Financial Corp.s
financial position or results of operation.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. The objective of ASU 2009-17 is to improve
financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more
relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. ASU 2009-17 is effective for
annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Standard Financial Corp.s
financial position or results of operation.
In September 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting Topic 820. This creates a practical
expedient to measure the fair value of an alternative investment that does not have a readily
determinable fair value. This guidance also requires certain additional disclosures. This
guidance is effective for
83
interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on Standard Financial Corp.s financial position or results of
operation.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20
to expand accounting and reporting guidance for own-share lending arrangements issued in
contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning on
or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements
outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a significant impact on Standard Financial Corp.s financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions
to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task
Force. ASU 2010-01 clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows
them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that
all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is
reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim
and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied on a retrospective
basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Standard Financial Corp.s
financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and
reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary a Scope Clarification. ASU 2010-02 amends
Subtopic 810-10 to address implementation issues related to changes in ownership provisions
including clarifying the scope of the decrease in ownership and additional disclosures. ASU
2010-02 is effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts Statement 160. If an entity has
previously adopted Statement 160, ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the first interim or annual
reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied retrospectively to the
first period Statement 160 was adopted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on Standard Financial Corp.s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics Technical
Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance
including the following topics: accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest
rate swap, issuance of financial statements subsequent events, use of residential method to value
acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding gains and
losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation. ASU 2010-04
is effective January 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on
Standard Financial Corp.s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-05, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718):
Escrowed Share Arrangements and the Presumption of Compensation. ASU 2010-05 updates existing
guidance to address the SEC staffs views on overcoming the presumption that for certain
shareholders escrowed share arrangements represent compensation. ASU 2010-05 is effective January
15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Standard Financial
Corp.s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic
820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments
to guidance on employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair
value
84
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a significant impact on Standard Financial Corp.s financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU
2010-08 clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on Standard Financial Corp.s financial position or results of
operation.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging. ASU 2010-11 provides
clarification and related additional examples to improve financial reporting by resolving potential
ambiguity about the breadth of the embedded credit derivative scope exception in ASC 815-15-15-8.
ASU 2010-11 is effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15,
2010. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on Standard
Financial Corp.s financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718):
Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the
Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. ASU 2010-13 provides guidance on the
classification of a share-based payment award as either equity or a liability. A share-based
payment that contains a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition is
required to be classified as a liability. ASU 2010-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010 and is not expected to
have a significant impact on Standard Financial Corp.s financial statements.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. U.S. GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars without consideration of changes in the relative purchasing
power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased
cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily
monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on
performance than the effects of inflation.
85
BUSINESS OF STANDARD FINANCIAL CORP.
Standard Financial Corp. is incorporated in the State of Maryland. We have not engaged in any
business to date. Upon completion of the conversion, we will own all of the issued and outstanding
stock of Standard Bank. We will retain up to 50% of the net proceeds from the offering and
initially invest the remaining net proceeds in Standard Bank as additional capital of Standard
Bank. Standard Financial Corp. will use a portion of the net proceeds to make a loan to the
employee stock ownership plan and will contribute $200,000 in cash and a number of shares of common
stock with a value equal to 3.5% of the shares sold in the offering to our charitable foundation.
At a later date, we may use the net proceeds to pay dividends to stockholders and may repurchase
shares of common stock, subject to regulatory limitations. We will invest our initial capital as
discussed in How We Intend to Use the Proceeds from the Offering.
In the future, Standard Financial Corp., as the holding company of Standard Bank, will be
authorized to pursue other business activities permitted by applicable laws and regulations, which
may include the acquisition of banking and financial services companies. See Supervision and
RegulationBank Holding Company Regulation for a discussion of the activities that are permitted
for bank holding companies. We currently have no understandings or agreements to acquire other
financial institutions. We may also borrow funds for reinvestment in Standard Bank.
Following the offering, our cash flow will primarily depend on earnings from the investment of
the net proceeds from the offering that we retain and any dividends we receive from Standard Bank.
Initially, Standard Financial Corp. will neither own nor lease any property, but will instead pay a
fee to Standard Bank for the use of its premises, equipment and furniture. At the present time, we
intend to employ only persons who are officers of Standard Bank to serve as officers of Standard
Financial Corp. We will, however, use the support staff of Standard Bank from time to time. We
will pay a fee to Standard Bank for the time devoted to Standard Financial Corp. by employees of
Standard Bank. However, these persons will not be separately compensated by Standard Financial
Corp. Standard Financial Corp. may hire additional employees, as appropriate, to the extent it
expands its business in the future.
BUSINESS OF STANDARD BANK
General
Our business consists primarily of accepting deposits from the general public and investing
those deposits, together with funds generated from operations and borrowings, in commercial real
estate loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit
commercial business loans and investment securities. To a lesser extent, we also originate
construction loans and consumer loans. We offer a variety of deposit accounts, including savings
accounts, certificates of deposit, money market accounts, commercial and regular checking accounts
and individual retirement accounts.
Our website address is www.standardbankpa.com. Information on our website is not incorporated
into this prospectus and should not be considered part of this prospectus.
Market Area
We conduct our operations from our ten branch offices (nine of which are full service) located
in the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany County, Maryland.
Standard Bank considers its primary market area to be eastern Allegheny, Westmoreland, northern
Fayette and southern Bedford counties in Pennsylvania and Allegany County, Maryland.
86
Our market area did not fully benefit from the national economic expansion during the period
prior to the current economic recession, and as a result, it has not been as severely affected
during the current economic recession. The national unemployment rate has remained over 9% and
real estate prices across the country have declined substantially in many markets. Recently, there
have been some signs of economic improvement nationally and in our market area, although the
unemployment rate in the eastern portion of our market area remains somewhat higher than the
respective unemployment rates of Pennsylvania and Maryland, respectively.
In comparison to many areas throughout the country, real estate values in our market have been
reasonably stable, as many areas in the country experienced more significant increases in real
estate values during the past decade. Management believes that this, combined with a more moderate
employment situation within our market area, has resulted in a less severe decline in real estate
market values in our market area compared to many other parts of the country.
Our market area has a broad range of private employers, and has changed its focus from heavy
industry to more specialized industries and service providers, including technology, health care,
education and finance. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania is the headquarters for seven Fortune 500
companies, including H.J. Heinz, USX Corporation and Alcoa Inc. Westmoreland County is east of
Allegheny County and is part of the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Allegany County, Maryland is
part of the Cumberland, Maryland-West Virginia metropolitan area, which is equidistant from
Pittsburgh and Baltimore, and its economy includes information technology, biotechnology, medical
services and manufacturing.
Median household income levels in Standard Banks market area have been mixed. Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania and Allegany County, Maryland have trailed the median household income growth
rate of their respective states and the nation over the last several years, while Westmoreland and
Fayette Counties have outpaced it. However, the median household income in each of the counties
within our market area is substantially less than their respective states and nationally.
Competition
We face intense competition in our market areas both in making loans and attracting deposits.
We compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies and investment banking firms. Some of our
competitors have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting
business, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide.
Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the communities surrounding our banking
offices, located in the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany
County, Maryland. As of June 30, 2009 (the latest date for which information is publicly
available), we ranked 30th in deposit market share out of 36 banks and thrift
institutions with offices in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania with a market share of less than 1.0%,
20th in deposit market share out of 50 banks and thrift institutions in Westmoreland
County, Pennsylvania with a market share of less than 1.0%, 27th in deposit market share
out of 42 banks and thrift institutions in Bedford County, Pennsylvania, with a market share of
less than 1.0% and 5th in deposit market share out of 5 banks and thrift institutions in
Allegany County, Maryland with a market share of 5.8%.
87
Lending Activities
Our primary lending activities are the origination of one- to four-family residential mortgage
loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and home equity loans and lines of
credit. To a lesser extent, we also originate construction loans and consumer loans.
One- to Four-Family Residential Mortgage Loans. At March 31, 2010, $139.0 million, or 49.1%,
of our total loan portfolio, consisted of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. We offer
fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans with maturities generally up to 30 years.
One- to four-family residential mortgage loans are generally underwritten according to Freddie
Mac guidelines, and we refer to loans that conform to such guidelines as conforming loans. We
generally originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum
conforming loan limits as established by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which
is generally $417,000 for single-family homes. However, loans in excess of $417,000 (which are
referred to as jumbo loans) may be generally originated for retention in our loan portfolio, and
not for sale to Freddie Mac. Our maximum loan amount for these loans is generally $750,000. We
originate fixed- and adjustable-rate loans with terms of up to 30 years. We generally underwrite
jumbo loans in the same manner as conforming loans.
We will originate loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%, up to and including a
loan-to-value ratio of 95%. We require private mortgage insurance for loans with loan-to-value
ratios in excess of 89%. During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we originated $4.4 million of
one- to four-family residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%.
We currently retain the servicing rights on loans sold to generate fee income. For the six
months ended March 31, 2010, we received loan servicing fees of $63,372. As of March 31, 2010, the
principal balance of loans serviced for others totaled $17.7 million.
We offer special programs for first-time home purchasers and low- and moderate-income home
purchasers. The property must be located within our lending area in a low-moderate census tract.
Household income may not exceed 80% at median income of the Metropolitan Statistical Area. All
bank-earned fees are waived.
Other than our loans for the construction of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans
(described under Construction Loans) and home equity lines of credit (described under Home
Equity Loans and Lines of Credit), we do not offer interest only mortgage loans on one- to
four-family residential properties (where the borrower pays interest for an initial period, after
which the loan converts to a fully amortizing loan). We also do not offer loans that provide for
negative amortization of principal, such as Option ARM loans, where the borrower can pay less
than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of
the loan. We do not offer subprime loans (loans that generally target borrowers with weakened
credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments,
bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores
or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (traditionally defined as loans having less than full
documentation).
Commercial Real Estate Loans. At March 31, 2010, $80.9 million, or 28.6%, of our total loan
portfolio, consisted of commercial real estate loans. Properties securing our commercial real
estate loans primarily include business owner-occupied properties, small office buildings and
office suites. We generally seek to originate commercial real estate loans with initial principal
balances of up to $3.0 million. Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are secured
by properties located in our
88
primary market area. At March 31, 2010, our largest commercial real estate loan relationship
had a principal balance of $2.4 million and was secured by a first mortgage on land and condominium
units. This loan was performing in accordance with its terms at March 31, 2010.
In the underwriting of commercial real estate loans, we generally lend up to the lesser of 80%
of the propertys appraised value or purchase price. We base our decision to lend primarily on the
economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating a
proposed commercial real estate loan, we emphasize the ratio of the propertys projected net cash
flow to the loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a preferred ratio of 1.25x),
computed after deduction for a vacancy factor and property expenses we deem appropriate. Personal
guarantees are usually obtained from commercial real estate borrowers. We require title insurance,
fire and extended coverage casualty insurance, and, if appropriate, flood insurance, in order to
protect our security interest in the underlying property. Almost all of our commercial real estate
loans are generated internally by our loan officers.
Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest rates and have shorter terms than
one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Commercial real estate loans, however, entail
greater credit risks compared to the one- to four-family residential mortgage loans we originate,
as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of
related borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing properties
typically depends on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the loan generally
is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the property to cover operating expenses and
debt service. Changes in economic conditions that are not in the control of the borrower or lender
could affect the value of the collateral for the loan or the future cash flow of the property.
Additionally, any decline in real estate values may be more pronounced for commercial real estate
than residential properties.
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. In addition to traditional one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans, we offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that are
secured by the borrowers primary residence, secondary residence or one- to four-family investment
properties. Our home equity loans are originated with fixed rates of interest and with terms of up
to 20 years. Home equity lines of credit have a maximum term of 20 years. The borrower is
permitted to draw against the line during the first ten years of the line of credit. During this
draw period, repayments are made at 2% of the unpaid balance monthly basis. After this initial
10-year draw period, the borrower is required to make payments to principal based on a 10-year
amortization. Our home equity lines of credit are currently originated with adjustable rates of
interest. Home equity loans and lines of credit are generally underwritten with the same criteria
that we use to underwrite one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. For a borrowers primary
residence, home equity loans and lines of credit may be underwritten with a loan-to-value ratio of
89% when combined with the principal balance of the existing mortgage loan, while the maximum
loan-to-value ratio on secondary residences and investment properties is 75% when combined with the
principal balance of the existing mortgage loan. We require appraisals on home equity loans and
lines of credit. At the time we close a home equity loan or line of credit, we record a mortgage
to perfect our security interest in the underlying collateral. At March 31, 2010 our in-house
maximum limit for a home equity loan or a line of credit was $250,000 without title insurance; any
higher amounts require title insurance.
Home equity loans and lines of credit entail greater credit risks compared to the one- to
four-family residential mortgage loans we originate, as they typically involve higher loan-to-value
ratios. Therefore, any decline in real estate values may have a more detrimental effect on home
equity loans and lines of credit compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans.
Commercial Business Loans. We make various types of secured and unsecured commercial business
loans to customers in our market area for the purpose of working capital and other general
89
business purposes. The terms of these loans generally range from less than one year to a
maximum of ten years. The loans are either negotiated on a fixed-rate basis or carry adjustable
interest rates indexed to a lending rate that is determined internally, or a short-term market rate
index. We seek to originate loans to small- and medium-size businesses with principal balances
between $150,000 and $750,000. At March 31, 2010, we had 312 commercial business loans outstanding
with an aggregate balance of $13.1 million, or 4.6% of the total loan portfolio.
Commercial credit decisions are based upon our credit assessment of the loan applicant. We
evaluate the applicants ability to repay in accordance with the proposed terms of the loan and we
assess the risks involved. Personal guarantees of the principals are typically obtained. In
addition to evaluating the loan applicants financial statements, we consider the adequacy of the
primary and secondary sources of repayment for the loan. Credit agency reports of the applicants
personal credit history supplement our analysis of the applicants creditworthiness. Collateral
supporting a secured transaction also is analyzed to determine its marketability. Commercial
business loans generally have higher interest rates than residential loans of like duration because
they have a higher risk of default since their repayment generally depends on the successful
operation of the borrowers business and the sufficiency of any collateral.
At March 31, 2010, our largest commercial business loan had a principal balance of $1.0
million and was secured primarily by conservation-related federal tax credits. At March 31, 2010,
this loan was performing in accordance with its terms.
Construction Loans. We make commercial construction loans for rental properties, commercial
buildings and homes built by developers on speculative, undeveloped property. The terms of
commercial construction loans are made in accordance with our commercial loan policy. Advances on
construction loans are made in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, but
are generally limited to an 80% loan-to-completed-appraised-value ratio. Repayment of construction
loans on non-residential properties is normally expected from the propertys eventual rental
income, income from the borrowers operating entity or the sale of the subject property. In the
case of income-producing property, repayment is usually expected from permanent financing upon
completion of construction. We typically provide the permanent mortgage financing on our
construction loans on income-producing property. Construction loans are interest-only loans
during the construction period, which typically do not exceed 12 months, and convert to permanent,
amortizing financing following the completion of construction. At March 31, 2010, construction
loans totaled $3.1 million, or 1.1%, of total loans receivable. At March 31, 2010, the additional
unadvanced portion of these construction loans totaled $2.2 million.
Generally, before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of
the property by a state-certified or state-licensed appraiser. We review and inspect properties
before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.
Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on
improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the
accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction
compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the
estimate of construction cost is inaccurate, we may be required to advance additional funds beyond
the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Moreover, if the
estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a
value that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan upon the sale of the
property. In the event we make a land acquisition loan on property that is not yet approved for
the planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not be granted or will be delayed.
Construction loans also expose us to the risk that improvements will
90
not be completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition,
the ultimate sale or rental of the property may not occur as anticipated.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations and Servicing. All loans that we
originate are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures, which incorporate standard
underwriting guidelines, including those of Freddie Mac, to the extent applicable. We originate
both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. Our loan origination and sales activity may be
adversely affected by a rising interest rate environment that typically results in decreased loan
demand. Most of our one- to four-family residential mortgage loan originations are generated by
our loan officers.
Historically, we have retained in our portfolio the majority of loans that we originate,
although in recent years we have sold most of our longer term loans to Freddie Mac and the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, with loan servicing rights retained. During the six months ended
March 31, 2010 and in fiscal year 2009, we sold $75,000 and $2.4 million, respectively, of
fixed-rate loans as originated, primarily with terms of 15 years and longer, to assist us in
managing interest rate risk.
We sell our loans with the servicing rights retained on residential mortgage loans, and we
intend to continue this practice in the future, subject to the pricing of retaining such servicing
rights. At March 31, 2010, we were servicing loans owned by others with a principal balance of
$17.7 million. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting for
principal and interest, contacting delinquent borrowers, supervising foreclosures and property
dispositions in the event of unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments on
behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the loans. We retain a portion of the interest
paid by the borrower on the loans we service as consideration for our servicing activities.
From time to time, we enter into participations in commercial loans with other banks. In
these circumstances, we will generally follow our customary loan underwriting and approval
policies. At March 31, 2010 we had $7.6 million in loan participations.
From time to time, we have purchased residential loans from other financial institutions. At
March 31, 2010 the unpaid balance of these loans was $1.1 million.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written,
non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our Board
of Directors. The loan approval process is intended to assess the borrowers ability to repay the
loan and value of the property that will secure the loan. To assess the borrowers ability to
repay, we review the borrowers employment and credit history and information on the historical and
projected income and expenses of the borrower. We require full documentation on all of our loan
applications.
Our policies and loan approval limits are established by the Board of Directors. Loans in
amounts up to $200,000 (for consumer loans), $1.0 million (for residential real estate loans), and
$1.0 million (for commercial loans) can be approved by designated individual officers or officers
acting together with specific lending approval authority. Relationships in excess of these amounts
require the approval of the Board of Directors or its loan committee.
We require appraisals of all real property securing one- to four-family residential and
commercial real estate loans and home equity loans and lines of credit. All appraisers are
state-licensed or state-certified appraisers, and our practice is to have local appraisers approved
by the Board of Directors annually.
91
Investments
Our Audit and Investment Committee, which is comprised of our Chief Executive Officer, our
Chief Financial Officer and our Controller, has primary responsibility for implementing our
investment policy, which is established by our Board of Directors. The general investment
strategies are developed and authorized by the Audit and Investment Committee in consultation with
our Board of Directors. The Audit and Investment Committee is responsible for the execution of
specific investment actions. These officers are authorized to execute investment transactions of
up to $1.0 million per investment security and $5.0 million for mortgage-backed securities per
transaction without the Board of Directors prior approval (provided the transactions are within the
scope of the established investment policy). The investment policy is reviewed annually by the
Investment Committee, and any changes to the policy are subject to approval by the full Board of
Directors. The overall objectives of the Audit and Investment Policy are to maintain a portfolio
of high quality and diversified investments to maximize interest income over the long term and to
minimize risk, to provide collateral for borrowings, to provide additional earnings when loan
production is low, and, when appropriate, to reduce our tax liability. The policy dictates that
investment decisions give consideration to the safety of principal, liquidity requirements and
interest rate risk management. All securities transactions are reported to the Board of Directors
on a monthly basis.
Our current investment policy permits investments in securities issued by the U.S. Government
as well as mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities, corporate bonds and direct obligations
of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Government National Mortgage Association. The investment policy
also permits, with certain limitations, investments in certificates of deposit, collateralized
mortgage obligations and mutual funds (limited to adjustable rate mortgage funds). The policy also
permits limited investments in equity securities. Our current investment policy does not permit
investment in stripped mortgage-backed securities or derivatives as defined in federal banking
regulations, or in other high-risk securities.
Our investment policy expressly prohibits the use of our investment portfolio for
market-oriented trading activities or speculative purposes unless otherwise approved by our Board
of Directors. It is not our intention to profit in our investment account from short-term
securities price movements. Accordingly, we do not currently have a trading account for investment
securities.
We designate a security as either held to maturity, available-for-sale, or trading, based upon
our ability and intent. Securities available-for-sale and trading securities are reported at
market value and securities held to maturity are reported at amortized cost. A periodic review and
evaluation of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities portfolios is conducted to
determine if the fair value of any security has declined below its carrying value and whether such
decline is other-than-temporary. The fair values of mortgage-backed securities are based on quoted
market prices or, when quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are not available, are
based on matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique that relies on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
At March 31, 2010, all of such securities were classified as available for sale. Our
securities portfolio at March 31, 2010, consisted primarily of securities with the following
carrying value: $26.9 million of U.S. government and agency obligations, $19.7 million of
mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. Government agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored
enterprises; $17.3 million in municipal obligations, $2.7 million in corporate bonds; $761,000 in
collateralized mortgage obligations and $1.2 million in equity securities. At March 31, 2010, none
of the collateral underlying our securities portfolio was considered subprime or Alt-A, and we held
$33,000 of common stock issued by Freddie Mac as of that date. See Managements Discussion of
Financial Condition and Results of OperationsBalance Sheet Analysis: March 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2009Investment Securities Portfolio for a discussion of the recent performance of
our securities portfolio.
92
We purchase mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or
Government National Mortgage Association. Historically, we have invested in mortgage-backed
securities to achieve positive interest rate spreads with minimal administrative expense and to
lower our credit risk as a result of the guarantees provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or
Government National Mortgage Association. However, in September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance
Agency placed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. The U.S. Treasury Department has
established financing agreements to ensure that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae meet their obligations
to holders of mortgage-backed securities that they have issued or guaranteed. These actions have
not affected the markets for mortgage-backed securities issued by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.
Mortgage-backed securities are securities issued in the secondary market that are
collateralized by pools of mortgages. Certain types of mortgage-backed securities are commonly
referred to as pass-through certificates because the principal and interest of the underlying
loans is passed through to investors, net of certain costs, including servicing and guarantee
fees. Mortgage-backed securities typically are collateralized by pools of one- to four-family or
multifamily (loans on properties with 5 or more units) mortgages, although we invest primarily in
mortgage-backed securities backed by one- to four-family mortgages. The issuers of such securities
pool and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors such as Standard
Bank. The interest rate on the security is lower than the interest rates on the underlying loans
to allow for payment of servicing and guaranty fees. Government National Mortgage Association, a
U.S. Government agency, and government sponsored enterprises, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,
either guarantee the payments or guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest to
investors. Mortgage-backed securities are more liquid than individual mortgage loans since there
is an active trading market for such securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities may be
used to collateralize our borrowings. Investments in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk
that actual payments will be greater or less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of
purchase, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any
discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the net yield on our securities. Current
prepayment speeds determine whether prepayment estimates require modification that could cause
amortization or accretion adjustments.
Sources of Funds
General. Deposits traditionally have been our primary source of funds for our investment and
lending activities. We also borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh to supplement
cash flow needs. Our additional sources of funds are scheduled loan payments, maturing
investments, loan repayments, customer repurchase agreements, retained earnings, income on other
earning assets and the proceeds of loan sales.
Deposits. We accept deposits primarily from the areas in which our offices are located. We
rely on our competitive pricing and products, convenient locations and quality customer service to
attract and retain deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates
and terms. Our deposit accounts consist of savings accounts, certificates of deposit and regular
checking accounts.
Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on
a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies and
market interest rates, liquidity requirements and our deposit growth goals.
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh
and funds borrowed from customers under repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2010, Federal Home
Loan Bank advances totaled $42.1 million, or 11.7%, of total liabilities and our repurchase
agreements totaled $2.9 million, or 0.81%, of total liabilities. At March 31, 2010, we had access
to additional Federal Home Loan Bank advances of up to $92.4 million. Advances from the Federal
Home
93
Loan Bank of Pittsburgh are secured by our investment in the common stock of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Pittsburgh as well as by a blanket pledge on our assets not otherwise pledged.
Repurchase agreements are secured by mortgage-backed securities.
Properties
We operate from our ten branches (nine of which are full service) located in the Pennsylvania
counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany County, Maryland. Standard Bank
considers its primary market area to be eastern Allegheny, Westmoreland, northern Fayette and
southern Bedford counties in Pennsylvania and Allegany County, Maryland. The net book value of our
premises, land and equipment was $3.8 million at March 31, 2010. The following table sets forth
information with respect to our full-service banking offices, including the expiration date of
leases with respect to leased facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
Branch Name |
|
Address |
|
Owned or Leased |
Murrysville (1)
|
|
4785 Old William Penn Hwy.
Murrysville, PA 15668
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Mount Pleasant
|
|
659 W. Main Street
Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Ligonier
|
|
211 W. Main Street
Ligonier, PA 15658
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Monroeville (2)
|
|
2640 Monroeville Blvd.
Monroeville, PA 15146
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Scottdale
|
|
100 Pittsburgh Street
Scottdale, PA 15683
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Walmart
|
|
2100 Summit Ridge Plaza
Mt. Pleasant, PA 15666
|
|
Leased (expires 10/31/2014) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyndman
|
|
3945 Center Street
Hyndman, PA 15545
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
State Line (3)
|
|
187 Hyndman Road
Hyndman, PA 15545
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
LaVale
|
|
1275 National Hwy.
LaVale, MD 21502
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumberland
|
|
200 N. Mechanic Street
Cumberland, MD 21502
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Bank headquarters. |
|
(2) |
|
Executive office. |
|
(3) |
|
Limited service facility. |
Legal Proceedings
At March 31, 2010, we were not involved in any legal proceedings the outcome of which we
believe would be material to our financial condition or results of operations.
Expense and Tax Allocation
Standard Bank will enter into an agreement with Standard Financial Corp. to provide it with
certain administrative support services, whereby Standard Bank will be compensated at not less than
the fair market value of the services provided. In addition, Standard Bank and Standard Financial
Corp. will
94
enter into an agreement to establish a method for allocating and for reimbursing the payment
of their consolidated tax liability.
Personnel
As of March 31, 2010, we had 76 full-time employees and 16 part-time employees. Our employees
are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have a good
working relationship with our employees.
Subsidiary
Standard Bank has one subsidiary, Westmoreland Investment Company, which is a Delaware
corporation that holds residential mortgage loans originated by Standard Bank.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
Standard Bank is supervised and examined by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking as the
issuer of its charter, and by the FDIC as the insurer of its deposits and its primary federal
regulator. Standard Bank also is regulated to a lesser extent by the Federal Reserve Board,
governing reserves to be maintained against deposits and other matters. This system of state and
federal regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an
institution may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the FDICs deposit insurance
fund and depositors, and not for the protection of security holders. Standard Bank is periodically
examined by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the FDIC to ensure that it satisfies
applicable standards with respect to its capital adequacy, assets, management, earnings, liquidity
and sensitivity to market interest rates. Following examinations, the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking and the FDIC prepare reports for the consideration of Standard Banks Board of Directors on
any operating deficiencies. Standard Banks relationship with its depositors also is regulated to
a great extent by federal law and, to a much lesser extent, state law, especially in matters
concerning the ownership of deposit accounts and the form and content of Standard Banks loan
documents.
As a bank holding company following the conversion, Standard Financial Corp. will be required
to file certain reports with, will be subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply with the
rules and regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board.
Standard Financial Corp. will also be subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.
Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the FDIC, the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking, the Federal Reserve Board or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Standard
Financial Corp., Standard Bank and their operations. See Risk FactorsRecently enacted financial
reform legislation will, among other things, create a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,
tighten capital standards, and result in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our
costs of operations.
Set forth below is a brief description of certain regulatory requirements that are or will be
applicable to Standard Bank and Standard Financial Corp. The description below is limited to
certain material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed, and is not intended to be a
complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Standard Bank and
Standard Financial Corp.
95
Banking Regulation
Pennsylvania Savings Bank Law Generally. The Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965, as amended
(the Banking Code), contains detailed provisions governing the organization, operations,
corporate powers, savings and investment authority, branching rights and responsibilities of
directors, officers and employees of Pennsylvania savings banks. A Pennsylvania savings bank may
locate or change the location of its principal place of business and establish an office anywhere
in, or adjacent to, Pennsylvania, with the prior approval of the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking. The Banking Code delegates extensive rulemaking power and administrative discretion to
the Department of Banking in its supervision and regulation of state-chartered savings banks. The
Pennsylvania Department of Banking may order any savings bank to discontinue any violation of law
or unsafe or unsound business practice and may direct any trustee, officer, attorney, or employee
of a savings bank engaged in an objectionable activity, after the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking has ordered the activity to be terminated, to show cause at a hearing before the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking why such person should not be removed.
Capital Requirements. Under the FDICs regulations, federally insured state-chartered banks
that are not members of the Federal Reserve System (state non-member banks), such as Standard
Bank, are required to comply with minimum leverage capital requirements. For an institution
determined by the FDIC to not be anticipating or experiencing significant growth and to be, in
general, a strong banking organization rated composite 1 under Uniform Financial Institutions
Ranking System established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, the minimum
capital leverage requirement is a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3.0%. For all other
institutions, the minimum leverage capital ratio is not less than 4.0%. Tier 1 capital is the sum
of common stockholders equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock (including any related
surplus) and minority investments in certain subsidiaries, less intangible assets (except for
certain servicing rights and credit card relationships) and certain other specified items.
In addition, FDIC regulations require state non-member banks to maintain certain ratios of
regulatory capital to regulatory risk-weighted assets, or risk-based capital ratios. Risk-based
capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet items to four
risk-weighted categories ranging from 0.0% to 100.0%. State non-member banks must maintain a
minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, of which at least one-half
must be Tier 1 capital. Total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 or supplementary
capital items, which include allowances for loan losses in an amount of up to 1.25% of
risk-weighted assets, cumulative preferred stock and certain other capital instruments, and a
portion of the net unrealized gain on equity securities. The includable amount of Tier 2 capital
cannot exceed the amount of the institutions Tier 1 capital.
Standard Bank is also subject to capital guidelines of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking.
Although not adopted in regulation form, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking requires 6%
leverage capital and 10% risk-based capital. The components of leverage and risk-based capital are
substantially the same as those defined by the FDIC.
Prompt Corrective Action. Under federal regulations, a bank is considered to be (i) well
capitalized if it has total risk-based capital of 10.0% or more, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 6.0%
or more, Tier I leverage capital of 5.0% or more, and is not subject to any written capital order
or directive; (ii) adequately capitalized if it has total risk-based capital of 8.0% or more,
Tier I risk-based capital of 4.0% or more and Tier I leverage capital of 4.0% or more (3.0% under
certain circumstances), and does not meet the definition of well capitalized; (iii)
undercapitalized if it has total risk-based capital of less than 8.0%, Tier I risk-based capital
of less than 4.0% or Tier I leverage capital of less than 4.0% (3.0% under certain circumstances);
(iv) significantly undercapitalized if it has total risk-based capital of less than 6.0%, Tier I
risk-based capital less than 3.0%, or Tier I leverage capital of less than 3.0%; and
96
(v) critically undercapitalized if its ratio of tangible equity to total assets is equal to
or less than 2.0%. Federal regulations also specify circumstances under which a federal banking
agency may reclassify a well capitalized institution as adequately capitalized, and may require an
adequately capitalized institution to comply with supervisory actions as if it were in the next
lower category (except that the FDIC may not reclassify a significantly undercapitalized
institution as critically undercapitalized). As of March 31, 2010, Standard Bank was
well-capitalized for this purpose. See Historical and Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Compliance.
At March 31, 2010, Standard Banks capital exceeded all applicable requirements. See
Historical and Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Compliance.
Loans-to-One-Borrower Limitation. Under federal regulations, with certain limited exceptions,
a Pennsylvania chartered savings bank may lend to a single or related group of borrowers on an
unsecured basis an amount equal to 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional
amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if such loan is secured by
readily marketable collateral, which is defined to include certain securities and bullion, but
generally does not include real estate. Our internal policy, however, is to make no loans either
individually or in the aggregate to one entity in excess of $3.8 million. However, in special
circumstances this limit may be exceeded subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.
Activities and Investments of Insured State-Chartered Banks. Federal law generally limits the
activities and equity investments of state-chartered banks insured by the FDIC to those that are
permissible for national banks. Under regulations dealing with equity investments, an insured
state bank generally may not, directly or indirectly, acquire or retain any equity investment of a
type, or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank. An insured state bank is not
prohibited from, among other things: (i) acquiring or retaining a majority interest in a
subsidiary; (ii) investing as a limited partner in a partnership the sole purpose of which is
direct or indirect investment in the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of a
qualified housing project, provided that such limited partnership investments may not exceed 2% of
the banks total assets; (iii) acquiring up to 10% of the voting stock of a company that solely
provides or reinsures liability insurance for directors, trustees or officers, or blanket bond
group insurance coverage for insured depository institutions; and (iv) acquiring or retaining the
voting shares of a depository institution if certain requirements are met.
Capital Distributions. The federal banking agencies have indicated that paying dividends that
deplete a depository institutions capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsafe and
unsound banking practice. Under the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, a depository institution may not
pay any dividend if payment would cause it to become undercapitalized or if it already is
undercapitalized. Moreover, the federal agencies have issued policy statements that provide that
bank holding companies and insured banks should generally only pay dividends out of current
operating earnings. Federal banking regulators have the authority to prohibit banks and bank
holding companies from paying a dividend if the regulators deem such payment to be an unsafe or
unsound practice.
Standard Bank is also subject to regulatory restrictions on the payment and amounts of
dividends under the Banking Code. The Banking Code states, in part, that dividends may be declared
and paid by Standard Bank only out of accumulated net earnings.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. Under the Community Reinvestment Act of
1977 (CRA), the FDIC is required to assess the record of all financial institutions regulated by
it to determine if such institutions are meeting the credit needs of the community (including low
and moderate income neighborhoods) which they serve. CRA performance evaluations are based on a
four-tiered rating system: Outstanding, Satisfactory, Needs to Improve and Substantial
Noncompliance. CRA
97
performance evaluations are considered in evaluating applications for such things as mergers,
acquisitions and applications to open branches. Standard Bank has a CRA rating of Satisfactory.
Transactions with Related Parties. Transactions between banks and their related parties or
affiliates are limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank
is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank.
In a holding company context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which are
controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the bank.
Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W (i) limit the
extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with any one
affiliate to an amount equal to 10.0% of such institutions capital stock and surplus, and contain
an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20.0% of such
institutions capital stock and surplus and (ii) require that all such transactions be on terms
substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the institution or subsidiary as those
provided to non-affiliates. The term covered transaction includes the making of loans, purchase
of assets, issuance of a guarantee and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other
extensions of credit by the financial institution to the affiliate are required to be
collateralized in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits loans by a company to its executive
officers and directors. However, the law contains a specific exception for loans by a depository
institution to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking laws
assuming such loans are also permitted under the law of the institutions chartering state. Under
such laws, the Standard Banks authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and 10%
shareholders (insiders), as well as entities under such persons control, is limited. The law
limits both the individual and aggregate amount of loans Standard Bank may make to insiders based,
in part, on the Standard Banks capital position and requires certain Board approval procedures to
be followed. Such loans are required to be made on terms substantially the same as those offered
to unaffiliated individuals and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. There is an
exception for loans made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to
all employees of the institution and does not give preference to insiders over other employees.
Loans to executive officers are further limited by specific categories.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal law requires each federal banking agency to
prescribe certain standards for all insured depository institutions. These standards relate to,
among other things, internal controls, information systems and audit systems, loan documentation,
credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, and other operational
and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. Interagency guidelines set forth the
safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address
problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate
federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the
guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the
appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution to implement an acceptable
compliance plan. Failure to implement such a plan can result in further enforcement action,
including the issuance of a cease and desist order or the imposition of civil money penalties.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Standard Banks deposits are insured up to applicable limits
by the FDIC. Under the FDICs risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to
one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain
other risk factors. An institution is assigned an assessment rate from 7 to 77.5 basis points
based upon the risk category to which it is assigned.
98
In 2009, the FDIC imposed a special emergency assessment on all insured institutions in order
to cover losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund resulting from bank failures. Standard Bank recorded
an expense of $177,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to reflect the special assessment.
In addition, in lieu of further special assessments, the FDIC required all insured depository
institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009 their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for
the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Estimated assessments for the
fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 were based upon the assessment rate in effect on
September 30, 2009, with 3 basis points added for the 2011 and 2012 assessment rates. In addition,
a 5% annual growth in the assessment base was assumed. Prepaid assessments are to be applied
against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not be applied to any special
assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be returned to the
institution on June 30, 2013. On December 30, 2009, Standard Bank prepaid approximately $1.5
million in estimated assessment fees. Because the prepaid assessments represent the prepayment of
future expense, they do not affect Standard Banks capital (the prepaid asset will have a
risk-weighting of 0%) or tax obligations.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has
engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations
or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We
do not currently know of any practice, condition or violation that may lead to termination of our
deposit insurance.
In addition to the FDIC assessments, the Financing Corporation (FICO) is authorized to
impose and collect, with the approval of the FDIC, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance
costs and custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the former
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the
annualized FICO assessment rate equaled 1.06 basis points for each $100 in domestic deposits
maintained at an institution. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019.
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The FDICs Transaction Account Guarantee Program, one
of two components of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, provides full federal deposit
insurance coverage for noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, regardless of dollar
amount. Standard Bank opted to participate in this program, which was initially set to expire on
December 31, 2009. On August 26, 2009, the FDIC extended the program until June 30, 2010, and
revised the annualized assessment rate charged for the guarantee to between 15 and 25 basis points,
depending on the institutions risk category, on balances in noninterest-bearing transaction
accounts that exceed the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000. We opted into the
extension. On April 13, 2010, the FDIC announced a second extension of the program until December
31, 2010, and that it retained discretion to further extend the program until December 31, 2011
without further rulemaking. Institutions must elect to opt out of the second extension before it
takes effect on July 1, 2010. The assessment rate remains the same from the prior extension. We
did opt into the extension.
The second component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, the Debt Guarantee Program,
guarantees certain senior unsecured debt of participating organizations. Standard Bank opted not
to participate in this component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. The Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 provided the Secretary of the Treasury with broad authority to
implement certain actions to help restore stability and liquidity to U.S. financial markets. One
of the programs established under the legislation is the Troubled Asset Relief ProgramCapital
Purchase Program (CPP), which provided for direct equity investment by the U.S. Treasury
Department in perpetual preferred stock or similar securities of qualified financial institutions.
CPP participants must
99
comply with a number of restrictions and provisions, including limits on executive
compensation, stock redemptions and declaration of dividends. Standard Bank opted not to
participate in the CPP.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. Standard Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System
provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities
involved in home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh,
Standard Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan
Bank. As of March 31, 2010, Standard Bank was in compliance with this requirement.
Other Regulations
Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Standard Bank are subject to state
usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Standard Banks operations are also subject
to federal laws applicable to credit transactions.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
As a bank holding company, Standard Financial Corp. will be subject to regulation and
examination by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board. Standard
Financial Corp. will be required to file with the Federal Reserve Board an annual report and such
additional information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended (the BHC Act). The BHC Act requires each bank holding company to
obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board before it may acquire substantially all the assets
of any bank, or before it may acquire ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if,
after such acquisition, it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than five percent of
the voting shares of such bank. Such a transaction may also require approval of the Pennsylvania
Department of Banking. Pennsylvania law permits bank holding companies to control an unlimited
number of banks.
Pursuant to provisions of the BHC Act and regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board
thereunder, Standard Financial Corp. may only engage in or own companies that engage in activities
deemed by the Federal Reserve Board to be so closely related to the business of banking or managing
or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto, and the holding company must obtain
permission from the Federal Reserve Board prior to engaging in most new business activities.
A bank holding company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the
BHC Act on any extensions of credit to the bank or any of its subsidiaries, investments in the
stock or securities thereof, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans
to any borrower. A bank holding company and its subsidiaries are also prevented from engaging in
certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit, lease or sale of property
or furnishing of services.
Federal banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding
companies. Currently, the required minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets
(including off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. At least half
of the total capital is required to be Tier 1 capital, consisting principally of common
shareholders equity, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of cumulative
perpetual preferred stock and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated
subsidiaries, less goodwill. The remainder (Tier 2 capital) may consist of a limited amount of
subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock, certain hybrid capital instruments and
other debt securities, perpetual preferred stock and a limited amount of the general loan loss
allowance.
100
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the federal banking regulators established
minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to total assets) guidelines for bank holding companies.
These guidelines provide for a minimum leverage ratio of 3% for those bank holding companies which
have the highest regulatory examination ratings and are not contemplating or experiencing
significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies are required to maintain a
leverage ratio of at least 4%.
The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by
bank holding companies. In general, the Federal Reserve Boards policies provide that dividends
should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention
by the bank holding company appears consistent with the organizations capital needs, asset quality
and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Boards policies also require that a bank
holding company serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks by standing ready
to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to those banks during periods of
financial stress or adversity and by maintaining the financial flexibility and capital-raising
capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks where necessary. Under
the prompt corrective action laws, the ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be
restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect
the ability of Standard Financial Corp. to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital
distributions.
Federal Securities Laws
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933 for the registration of the shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to
the stock offering. Upon completion of the stock offering, our common stock will be registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We will be
subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of shares of common stock to be issued in
the stock offering does not cover the resale of those shares. Shares of common stock purchased by
persons who are not our affiliates may be resold without registration. Shares purchased by our
affiliates will be subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933.
If we meet the current public information requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933, each affiliate of ours that complies with the other conditions of Rule 144, including those
that require the affiliates sale to be aggregated with those of other persons, would be able to
sell in the public market, without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any
three-month period, the greater of 1% of our outstanding shares, or the average weekly volume of
trading in the shares during the preceding four calendar weeks. In the future, we may permit
affiliates to have their shares registered for sale under the Securities Act of 1933.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing
and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate
information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer will be required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including having these officers certify that:
they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors
and the audit committee of the Board of Directors about our internal control over financial
reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their
evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting or
in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial reporting. We will
be subject to further reporting and audit requirements under the requirements of the Sarbanes-
101
Oxley Act. We will prepare policies, procedures and systems designed to ensure compliance
with these regulations.
TAXATION
Federal Taxation
General. Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank are subject to federal income taxation in
the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following
discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize material federal income tax matters
and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Standard Financial Corp. and
Standard Bank.
Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, Standard Bank will file a consolidated
tax return with Standard Financial Corp., will report its income and expenses on the accrual method
of accounting and use a calendar year ending December 31st for filing their consolidated federal
income tax returns.
Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum
tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, referred to
as alternative minimum taxable income. The alternative minimum tax is payable to the extent
alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount. Net operating losses can,
in general, offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain payments of
alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. At
March 31, 2010, Standard Mutual Holding Company had no alternative minimum tax credit carryforward.
Net Operating Loss Carryovers. Generally, a financial institution may carry back net
operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years.
However, as a result of recent legislation, subject to certain limitations, the carryback period
for net operating losses incurred in 2008 or 2009 (but not both years) has been expanded to five
years. At March 31, 2010, Standard Mutual Holding Company had no net operating loss carryforward
for federal income tax purposes.
Corporate Dividends. Standard Financial Corp. will be able to exclude from its income 100% of
dividends received from Standard Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations.
Audit of Tax Returns. Standard Mutual Holding Company and Standard Banks federal income tax
returns, as applicable, have not been audited in the most recent five-year period.
State Taxation
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of Maryland impose an income tax of
approximately 11.5% and 8.25%, respectively, on income measured substantially the same as federally
taxable income, except that U.S. Government interest is not fully taxable. Standard Mutual Holding
Company and Standard Banks state income tax returns, as applicable, have not been audited in the
most recent five-year period.
102
MANAGEMENT OF STANDARD FINANCIAL CORP.
Shared Management Structure
The directors of Standard Financial Corp. are the same individuals who are the directors of
Standard Bank and the trustees of Standard Mutual Holding Company. In addition, the executive
officers of Standard Bank will be the executive officers of Standard Financial Corp. We expect
that Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank will continue to have common executive officers
until there is a business reason to establish separate management structures.
Executive Officers of Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank
The following table sets forth information as of March 31, 2010, regarding the individuals who
serve as the executive officers of Standard Bank and who will be the executive officers of Standard
Financial Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) |
Timothy K. Zimmerman
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Colleen M. Brown
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer |
Paul A. Knapp
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Commercial Loan Officer |
The executive officers of Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank are appointed
annually.
Directors of Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank
Standard Financial Corp. has seven directors. Directors serve three-year staggered terms so
that approximately one-third of the directors are elected at each annual meeting. After the
conversion, directors of Standard Bank will be elected by Standard Financial Corp. as its sole
stockholder.
The following table states our directors names, their ages as of March 31, 2010, and when
their current terms expire:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) Held With |
|
|
|
|
|
Current Term |
Name |
|
Standard Financial Corp. |
|
Age |
|
Expires |
Terence L. Graft
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
January 2013 |
Horace G. Cofer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
January 2012 |
William T. Ferri
|
|
Director
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
January 2011 |
David C. Mathews
|
|
Director
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
January 2011 |
Thomas J. Rennie
|
|
Director
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
January 2012 |
Dale A. Walker
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
January 2013 |
Timothy K. Zimmerman
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
January 2012 |
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that each of our directors, with the exception of
directors Timothy Zimmerman and David Mathews, is independent as defined in the listing rules of
the Nasdaq Stock Market. Messrs. Zimmerman and Mathews are not independent because they are
employees of Standard Bank.
103
At March 31, 2010, Standard Bank had two loans outstanding to entities in which Director Ferri
had an ownership interest, with an aggregate balance of $196,568, as well as one savings account
loan secured by a certificate of deposit to Director Cofer with a balance of $120,025 and one home
equity line of credit to Director Mathews with a balance of $2,753, respectively. Each of these
loans were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including
interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with the
general public, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other
unfavorable features. At March 31, 2010, Standard Bank had no additional loans outstanding with
any of its Directors or Executive Officers.
The Business Background of Our Directors and Executive Officers
Directors:
The business experience for the past five years of each of our directors and executive
officers is set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated, directors and executive officers have
held their positions for at least the past five years.
Terence L. Graft has served as Chairman of the Board of Standard Bank since 2008. Mr. Graft
is the owner of Kepple-Graft Funeral Home located in Greensburg, Pennsylvania and Graft-Jacquillard
Funeral Home located in Scottdale, Pennsylvania. He is a member of the National and Pennsylvania
Funeral Directors Associations, as well as the Funeral Directors Associations of Armstrong,
Westmoreland and Indiana, Pennsylvania. Mr. Grafts experience as a local business owner and his
knowledge of the local business community led to his appointment to the Board in 1991.
Horace G. Cofer is President of Horace Cofer Associates, Inc., an engineering consulting
service located in Murrysville, Pennsylvania. Mr. Cofers experience managing a local business and
his knowledge of the local business community led to his appointment to the Board in 1991.
William T. Ferri is a pharmacist and the owner of Ferri Pharmacy located in Murrysville,
Pennsylvania. He is the Chief Executive Officer of Ferri Enterprises, a property development and
management company, and the President of Ferri Supermarkets, Inc. He is also a member of the
Pennsylvania Pharmacists Association, the National Association of Retail Pharmacists, the
Murrysville Community Economic Development Corporation, the Westmoreland Chamber of Commerce and
the Murrysville Business Association. Mr. Ferris experience owning a local business and his
knowledge of the local business community led to his appointment to the Board in 2007.
David C. Mathews is the Business Development Coordinator of Standard Bank since January 2006.
Prior to joining Standard Bank, Mr. Mathews served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Hoblitzell National Bank from 1998 until Hoblitzell was merged with Standard Bank in January 2006.
Mr. Mathews has 34 years of experience in banking. Mr. Mathews is a member of the Boards of the
Western Maryland Health System Foundation and the YMCA of Cumberland, and is also a member of the
Frostburg State Business Advisory Board and The Greater Cumberland Committee. Mr. Mathews
experience with commercial lending and with the markets served by Hoblitzell led to his appointment
to the Board in 2006.
Thomas J. Rennie is a certified public accountant and the owner of a public accounting firm
offering tax, accounting and consulting services in Ligonier, Pennsylvania. He is a member and
past President of the Ligonier Chamber of Commerce, the President of the Southwestern Chapter of
the Pennsylvania Institutes of Certified Public Accountants and a past President of Ligonier Rotary
Club. Mr. Rennies accounting experience and knowledge of the local business community led to his
appointment to the Board in 2008.
104
Dale A. Walker is a certified public accountant and is the owner of Dale A. Walker, CPA, an
accounting firm in Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania. He is a member of the American and Pennsylvania
Institutes of Certified Public Accountants, a director and Treasurer of Penn Laurel Holdings, a
real estate investment company, a director and past Chairman of the Board of Excela Health, a
not-for-profit health care system in western Pennsylvania, Treasurer of Mount Pleasant Business
District Authority and a past president and member of the Mount Pleasant Rotary. Mr. Walkers
accounting experience and knowledge of the local business community led to his appointment to the
Board in 1999.
Timothy K. Zimmerman is President and Chief Executive Officer of Standard Bank since 1992 and
a director since 1993. Prior to joining Standard Bank, Mr. Zimmerman worked with Landmark Savings
Association, Pittsburgh (and predecessors) from 1977 to 1992, including service as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer from 1985 to 1992. Mr. Zimmerman is a certified public
accountant and also worked with KPMG Peat Marwick from 1973 to 1977. Mr. Zimmerman is very active
in community organizations and is a member of the Board of the Pennsylvania Association of
Community Bankers and a former director of the Independent Community Bankers of America.
Executive Officers Who Are Not Also Directors:
Colleen M. Brown is Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Standard Bank since
1996. Ms. Brown has 31 years of banking and accounting experience, including service with PNC
Bank, Pittsburgh, Integra Financial Corporation, Pittsburgh, and Landmark Savings Association,
Pittsburgh. Ms. Brown is a certified public accountant and served as a senior auditor for KPMG
Peat Marwick, Pittsburgh from 1979 to 1983. Ms. Brown is a member of the American and Pennsylvania
Institutes of Certified Public Accountants.
Paul A. Knapp is Senior Vice President Chief Commercial Loan Officer of Standard Bank since
1999. Prior to joining Standard Bank, Mr. Knapp worked as Commercial Loan Officer/Branch Manager
with Mars National Bank, Gibsonia, Pennsylvania from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Knapp has 33 years of
experience in banking, including service with Landmark Savings Association, Pittsburgh. Mr. Knapp
also served as a National Bank Examiner for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency from 1992
to 1995. Mr. Knapp is a member of Robert Morris Associates of Pittsburgh, the Mortgage Bankers of
Pittsburgh, the Business Network International (Monroeville) and the Monroeville Rotary. He is
also Chairman of the Loan Committee for the Regional Development Funding Corporation, a past
Chairman of the Regional Development Funding Corporation, and a member of the Board of the Penn
Township Planning and Zoning Commission.
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
We conduct business through meetings of our Board of Directors and its committees. During the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Board of Directors of Standard Bank met 12 times. As
Standard Financial Corp. was recently incorporated, the Board of Directors of Standard Financial
Corp. did not meet during fiscal 2009. Standard Banks Board of Directors has established standing
committees, including a Loan Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Compliance/Security/Technology
Committee and an Audit and Investment Committee. Each of these committees operates under a written
charter, which governs its composition, responsibilities and operations.
The table below sets forth the directors of each of the listed standing committees. Director
Walker will be designated as an Audit Committee Financial Expert for the Audit Committee, as that
term is defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compliance, Security & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
|
Compensation |
|
Audit & Investment |
|
Loan |
Terence L. Graft |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
Horace G. Cofer |
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
William T. Ferri |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
David C. Mathews |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Thomas J. Rennie |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Dale A. Walker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
X |
* |
|
|
X |
|
Timothy K. Zimmerman |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes committee chair. |
Directors Compensation
Director Fees. Each director of Standard Financial Corp., other than Messrs. Mathews and
Zimmerman, will be paid an annual fee of $24,000. The Chairman of the Board of Directors will
receive an additional $6,000 retainer annually and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors will
receive an additional $3,000 retainer annually. Directors will not receive committee fees,
attendance fees or other fees. In addition, Standard Bank has an Eastern Region Advisory Board,
which was initiated following the acquisition of Hoblitzell National Bank. The Advisory Board
currently consists of eight members, three of whom are employees of Standard Bank (including
Messrs. Mathews and Zimmerman). The Eastern Region Advisory Board meets on a quarterly basis.
Each independent Advisory Board member receives a fee of $500 per meeting attended. Aggregate
Advisory Board fees paid for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, were $7,500.
Directors Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 certain information as to the total remuneration we paid to
our directors. Neither Mr. Zimmerman nor Mr. Mathews receives compensation for service on the
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Compensation Table For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Fees Earned Or Paid In |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Cash |
|
All Other Compensation |
|
Total |
Terence L. Graft |
|
$ |
21,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,400 |
|
Dale A. Walker |
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
Horace G. Cofer |
|
|
16,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,600 |
|
Robert L. George (1) |
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,360 |
|
David C. Mathews (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,391 |
|
|
|
167,391 |
|
William T. Ferri |
|
|
16,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,600 |
|
Thomas J. Rennie |
|
|
16,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,600 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. George retired from the Board of Directors effective December 31, 2008. His fees include
a $360 retainer for serving as Secretary of the Board of Directors. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Mathews is not paid any fees for his service as a director, however, Mr. Mathews receives
compensation for his services as an employee of Standard Bank. Mr. Mathews is the Business
Development Coordinator for Standard Bank and he is primarily responsible for originating
commercial real estate loans. Mr. Mathews was initially a commissioned based employee, and,
in 2008, Standard Bank and Mr. Mathews agreed that it was in the best interest of the parties
for Mr. Mathews to be compensated with a base salary instead of commissions. The amount shown
in this column includes $153,059 for base salary, $10,000 for bonus, $3,954 for Pentegra
Defined Contribution Plan for Financial Institutions (401(k) Plan) matching contributions
and $378 for premiums paid by Standard Bank for group term life insurance. |
Other Compensation Arrangements. Standard Bank entered into Phantom Stock
Appreciation Rights Agreements with Messrs. Graft, Walker, Cofer and George. Please see the
description of the Phantom Stock Appreciation Rights Agreements set forth below under the
Executive Compensation Summary Compensation Table for further details.
Non-Compete Agreement with David C. Mathews. On June 8, 2010, Standard Bank entered into a
Non-Compete Agreement with Mr. Mathews, which provides that in order to protect the business,
confidential and other proprietary information of Standard Bank, for a period of two years
following his
106
termination of employment, Mr. Mathews will not (i) directly or indirectly solicit any officer
or employee to terminate their employment with Standard Bank; (ii) accept employment or become
affiliated with any competitor of Standard Bank within 100 miles of where Standard Bank operates
(except this provision shall not apply if he is terminated without cause); and (iii) solicit or
cause any customer of Standard Bank to terminate an existing business relationship with Standard
Bank.
In exchange for the non-compete and non-solicitation provisions, upon termination of Mr.
Mathews employment, Standard Bank will pay Mr. Mathews (i) $80,000, payable in eight equal
quarterly installments, if Mr. Mathews terminates employment prior to age 64, or (ii) $40,000,
payable in four equal quarterly installments, if Mr. Mathews terminates employment on or after age
64 but before age 65, or (iii) nothing if Mr. Mathews terminates employment on or after age 65.
The first payment shall be made on the date of Mr. Mathews termination of employment and each
subsequent payment shall be made on each three month anniversary of the date of his termination of
employment. The first payment may be delayed by six months in order to comply with Section 409A of
the Internal Revenue Code.
Executive Officer Compensation
Summary Compensation Table. The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or
earned by our President and Chief Executive Officer, Timothy K. Zimmerman, our Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, Colleen M. Brown and our Senior Vice President and Chief
Commercial Lending Officer, Paul A. Knapp for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. We refer
to these individuals as Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Compensation |
|
All Other |
|
|
Name and principal position |
|
Year |
|
Salary (1) |
|
Bonus |
|
Compensation (4) |
|
Earnings |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
Timothy K. Zimmerman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
217,885 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
(3) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,763 |
(5) |
|
$ |
295,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colleen M. Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
96,687 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,163 |
(6) |
|
|
111,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul A. Knapp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial
Lending Officer |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
89,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,015 |
(7) |
|
|
101,268 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts in this column include contributions by Mr. Zimmerman, Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp to
the 401(k) Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Ms. Brown has voluntarily elected to work a reduced schedule in accordance with Bank
policies. The amount shown reflects her annual salary rate of $120,858, pro-rated for the
number of days worked. |
|
(3) |
|
The amount of Mr. Zimmermans cash bonus is determined at the discretion of the Banks Board
of Directors. |
|
(4) |
|
Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp earned cash bonus incentives under their respective cash bonus plans
in the amount of $8,410 and $8,245, respectively, refer to Benefit Plans Cash
Incentives for additional information related to these payments. The cash bonus amounts were
earned in fiscal year 2008 and were paid in fiscal year 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes $6,296 for 401(k) Plan matching contributions, $1,200 received by Mr. Zimmerman for
the cost of supplemental long-term disability insurance, $349 for premiums paid by Standard
Bank for group term life insurance, $5,178 received by Mr. Zimmerman for the cost of an
automobile and $4,740 for country club expenses. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes $3,231 for 401(k) Plan matching contributions, $340 for premiums paid by Standard
Bank for group term life insurance and $2,592 received by Ms. Brown for opting out of Standard
Banks medical insurance plan. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes $2,940 for 401(k) Plan matching contributions, $329 for premiums paid by Standard
Bank for group term life insurance and $746 for commissions. |
107
Employment Agreements. Upon completion of the conversion, Standard Financial Corp. and
Standard Bank intend to enter into an employment agreement with each of Timothy K. Zimmerman,
Colleen M. Brown and Paul A. Knapp (referred to below as the executives or executive). Our
continued success depends to a significant degree on the skills and competence of these officers,
and the employment agreements are intended to ensure that we maintain a stable management base
following the offering. The discussion below addresses the employment agreements to be entered
into with the executives.
The employment agreement with Mr. Zimmerman provides for a three-year term and the employment
agreements with Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp provide for a two-year term, subject to daily renewal. The
initial base salaries under the employment agreements are $274,000 for Mr. Zimmerman, $131,000 for
Ms. Brown and $100,000 for Mr. Knapp. The agreements also provide for participation in employee
benefit plans and programs maintained for the benefit of senior management personnel, including
discretionary bonuses, participation in stock-based benefit plans, and certain fringe benefits as
described in the agreements.
Upon termination of an executives employment for cause, as defined in each of the agreements,
the executive will receive no further compensation or benefits under the agreement. If we
terminate the executive for reasons other than for cause or if the executive terminates voluntarily
under specified circumstances that constitute a good reason constructive termination (as defined in
each of the agreements), the executive will receive an amount equal to the base salary, cash bonus
and employer contributions to benefit plans that would have been payable for the remaining term of
the agreement, payable in a lump sum. We will also continue to pay for each executives life,
health, vision and dental coverage for up to three years (two years for Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp),
with the executive responsible for his or her share of the employee insurance premium.
In the event of a change in control, followed within 12 months by the executives termination
for a reason other than for cause or if the executive terminates voluntarily under specified
circumstances that constitute a good reason constructive termination (as defined in each of the
agreements), the executive will receive an amount equal to the greater of (a) the payments
described in the immediately preceding paragraph, or (b) an amount equal to the three times (two
times for Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp) annual compensation (as defined in each of the agreements, and
includes taxable income and employer contributions to tax-qualified and non-qualified deferred
compensation plans) that would have been payable for 36 months (24 months for Ms. Brown and Mr.
Knapp), payable in a lump sum. We will also continue to pay for each executives life, health,
vision and dental coverage for up to three years (two years for Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp), with the
executive responsible for the executives share of the employee insurance premium.
Upon termination of employment that would entitle the executive to a severance payment (other
than a termination in connection with a change in control), the executive will be required to
adhere to a one-year non-competition provision. The executive will be required to release us from
any and all claims in order to receive any payments and benefits under their agreements. We will
agree to pay all reasonable costs and legal fees of the executives in relation to the enforcement
of the employment agreements, provided the executives succeed on the merits in a legal judgment,
arbitration proceeding or settlement. The employment agreements also provide for indemnification
of the executives to the fullest extent legally permissible.
Assuming the agreements were in effect and the executives had been terminated in connection
with a change in control based on the compensation information included in Executive Officer
Compensation, Mr. Zimmerman, Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp would have received aggregate severance
108
payments of approximately $1.0 million, $285,000 and $222,000, respectively, based upon each
executives current level of compensation.
Change in Control Agreements. Standard Bank intends to enter into change-in-control
agreements with three additional officers effective upon completion of the conversion. The
change-in-control agreements will provide a benefit in the event of involuntary termination of
employment or resignation for a good reason (as defined in each of the agreements) equal to two
times the sum of the executives base salary and the highest bonus earned during the prior three
years, payable in a lump sum, and the continuation of non-taxable medical and dental coverage for a
two-year period, with the executive responsible for his share of the employee premium. The amount
of the payment to be made in connection with a change in control will be reduced, if necessary, to
an amount that is $1.00 less than the amount that would otherwise be an excess parachute payment
under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Benefit Plans
Cash Incentives. The purpose of offering cash incentives is to provide structured annual
bonuses to our Named Executive Officers for their contributions to the achievement of strategic
organizational objectives of Standard Bank. Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp are each covered by
substantially identical performance based cash bonus plans, except each agreement has different
performance measures that are used to evaluate and determine the amount of each bonus. Before any
bonus payment may be paid, the covered executive must achieve certain qualitative goals, which
include evaluating the contributions of the executive to the executive team and the contributions
of the executive to the development of Standard Bank programs and products. For Ms. Brown, the
bank-wide performance measures for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 were based on Standard
Banks efficiency ratio, overall return on assets, ratio of noninterest expense to average assets,
developing certain borrowing strategies and developing a comprehensive three year tax plan. For
Mr. Knapp, the bank-wide performance measures for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 were
based on achieving certain annual production goals, origination fees, loan quality to loan
delinquency ratios, management of staff and loan pricing. The amount of the bonus for Ms. Brown
and Mr. Knapp is the sum of the bank-wide performance measurements, which is expressed as a
percentage of base salary. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, such percentage is a
maximum of 15% of base salary for Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp. Approval for payments under the bonus
plan is given by the Board of Directors. If a covered executive terminates employment prior to
receiving payment of the cash bonus, the Bank is under no obligation to make the payment. Bonuses,
if any, are paid in a single cash lump sum distribution within 60 days of the close of the calendar
year.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapps incentive payments,
target award opportunities, and actual incentives awarded as a percentage of base salary, were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 incentive amount paid |
|
Target award opportunity |
|
Actual award as a percent of |
Name |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
base salary% |
Colleen M. Brown |
|
|
8,410 |
|
|
|
9,669 |
|
|
|
8.70 |
|
Paul A. Knapp |
|
|
8,245 |
|
|
|
8,901 |
|
|
|
9.27 |
|
Awards made to Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp are also reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Phantom Stock Agreements. Standard Bank entered into substantially identical Phantom Stock
Appreciation Rights Agreements (Phantom Stock Agreement) with executives and directors in 2002 to
provide participants with an incentive opportunity to share in Standard Banks performance and
value creation. Directors Graft, Walker, Cofer, George and our Named Executive Officers, Mr.
Zimmerman, Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp, have each entered into a Phantom Stock Agreement. Under each
Phantom
109
Stock Agreement, a participant was initially credited with a one-time allocation of phantom
stock. Phantom stock is used solely as a measurement tool and it represents a hypothetical share
of Standard Bank (Phantom Stock). Each year, a participants phantom stock account is credited
with a dollar amount equal to the annual appreciation in the Phantom Stock share price times the
number of shares of Phantom Stock initially credited to the participant. The Phantom Stock share
price is determined by dividing the Capital Account, as defined in the Phantom Stock Agreement, by
the total number of outstanding Phantom Stock shares. Participants will be entitled to the
appreciation in the price of the Phantom Stock, and not the value of the one-time grant of Phantom
Stock that was credited to the participants accounts in connection with implementing the Phantom
Stock Agreements.
In connection with the mutual to stock conversion, the Phantom Stock Agreements will be frozen
and no benefits will accrue on or after the date of the conversion. Participants will receive cash
distributions pursuant to their distribution elections, commencing in the first quarter of 2012.
If a participant terminates employment or service, as applicable, prior to 2012, he or she will be
entitled to the vested portion of their Phantom Stock account. A participants interest in his or
her phantom stock account vests over 5 years, with 20% vesting each year, and consequently all
directors and executives are 100% vested. The Phantom Stock Agreements provide disability, change
in control and a death benefit if the participant dies while in the employment or service, as
applicable, of Standard Bank.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, Directors Graft, Walker, Cofer and George had
earnings credited to their account balances under their Phantom Stock Agreements in the amount of
$3,052, $3,052, $3,052 and $678, respectively. In addition, Mr. Zimmerman, Ms. Brown and Mr. Knapp
had earnings credited to their account balances in the amount of $16,488, $6,804 and $6,804,
respectively. Mr. George received a distribution of his entire account balance upon his
resignation from the Board of Directors and in accordance with the terms of his Phantom Stock
Agreement.
Tax-Qualified Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan. Standard Bank participates in the Pentegra Defined Contribution Plan for
Financial Institutions, a multi-employer 401(k) plan, which provides benefits to substantially all
of our employees (the 401(k) Plan). Employees of Standard Bank who are 21 or older and have
completed one year of service are eligible to participate in the plan (Participants).
Participants may contribute up to 50% of their annual compensation to the plan on a pre-tax basis,
subject to limits prescribed by law. Standard Bank provides a 401(k) match equal to 50% of the
Participants salary deferral on the first 6% of compensation, for a maximum employer matching
contribution of 3% of a Participants pre-tax compensation. Employer contributions are subject to
a six-year graded vesting schedule, with 20% vesting after two years of service and an additional
20% vest after each following year of credited service, so that a participant is 100% vested after
six years of credited service. Participants are always 100% vested in their salary deferrals.
Participants will also become 100% vested in the employer contributions allocated to their accounts
upon attainment of normal retirement age or in the event of the participants death or disability.
Participants may invest their accounts in the investment options provided under the 401(k) plan.
Participants may request a withdrawal from their accounts in the event they incur a financial
hardship. A Participant will become eligible for distribution of his or her plan benefit upon
termination of employment and a Participant that satisfies certain eligibility requirements may
request distributions of certain portions of their account balance while employed. Participants
may elect to receive payments of their benefits in a lump sum or in installments, provided that
their account balance equal or exceeds $500. During the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
Standard Bank recognized $85,984 and $84,977, respectively, as a 401(k) Plan expense.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Standard Bank participates in the Financial Institutions
Retirement Fund, a multi-employer pension plan (the Pension Plan). Effective August 1, 2005, the
110
annual benefit provided to employees under the Pension Plan was frozen. Freezing the Pension
Plan eliminated all future benefit accruals; however, the accrued benefit as of August 1, 2005
remains. During the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Standard Bank recognized $471,000 and
$167,000, respectively, as pension expense and made $50,000 and $222,000, respectively, as
contributions to the Pension Plan. Standard Bank may maintain or terminate the Pension Plan as
circumstances warrant.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan. In connection with the mutual to stock conversion, Standard
Bank adopted an employee stock ownership plan for eligible employees. Eligible employees will
begin participation in the employee stock ownership plan on the later of the effective date of the
conversion or upon the first entry date commencing on or after the eligible employees completion
of 1,000 hours of service during a continuous 12-month period and the attainment of age 21.
The employee stock ownership plan trustee is expected to purchase, on behalf of the employee
stock ownership plan, 8% of the total number of shares of Standard Financial Corp. common stock
issued in the offering, including shares issued to the charitable foundation. We anticipate that
the employee stock ownership plan will fund its stock purchase with a loan from Standard Financial
Corp. equal to the aggregate purchase price of the common stock. The loan will be repaid
principally through Standard Banks contribution to the employee stock ownership plan and dividends
payable on common stock held by the employee stock ownership plan over the anticipated 20 year term
of the loan. The interest rate for the employee stock ownership plan loan is expected to be an
adjustable rate equal to the prime rate, as published in The Wall Street Journal, on the closing
date of the offering. Thereafter the interest rate will adjust annually and will be the prime rate
on the first business day of the calendar year, retroactive to January 1 of such year. See Pro
Forma Data.
The trustee will hold the shares purchased by the employee stock ownership plan in an
unallocated suspense account, and shares will be released from the suspense account on a pro-rata
basis as we repay the loan. The trustee will allocate the shares released among participants on
the basis of each participants proportional share of compensation relative to all participants.
Participants will become 100% vested upon the completion of six years of service. Participants who
were employed by Standard Bank immediately prior to the offering will receive credit for vesting
purposes for years of service prior to adoption of the employee stock ownership plan. Participants
also will become fully vested automatically upon normal retirement, death or disability, a change
in control, or termination of the employee stock ownership plan. Generally, participants will
receive distributions from the employee stock ownership plan upon separation from service.
The employee stock ownership plan permits participants to direct the trustee as to how to vote
the shares of common stock allocated to their accounts. The trustee votes unallocated shares and
allocated shares for which participants do not provide instructions on any matter in the same ratio
as those shares for which participants provide instructions, subject to fulfillment of the
trustees fiduciary responsibilities.
Under applicable accounting requirements, Standard Bank will record a compensation expense for
the employee stock ownership plan at the fair value of the shares as they are committed to be
released from the unallocated suspense account to participants accounts. The compensation expense
resulting from the release of the common stock from the suspense account and allocation to plan
participants will result in a corresponding reduction in Standard Financial Corp.s earnings.
111
Benefits to be Considered Following Completion of the Stock Offering
Following the stock offering, we intend to adopt a new stock-based benefit plan that will
provide for grants of stock options and restricted common stock awards. In accordance with
applicable regulations, we anticipate that the plan will authorize a number of stock options and a
number of shares of restricted stock, not to exceed 10% and 4%, respectively, of the shares issued
in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation. These limitations will not apply if the
plan is implemented more than one year after the conversion.
The stock-based benefit plan will not be established sooner than six months after the
conversion and, if adopted within one year after the conversion, would require the approval by
stockholders owning a majority of the outstanding shares of Standard Financial Corp. common stock
eligible to be cast. If the stock-based benefit plan is established after one year after the
conversion, it would require the approval of our stockholders by a majority of votes cast.
The following additional restrictions would apply to our stock-based benefit plan only if the
plan is adopted within one year after the stock offering:
|
|
|
non-employee directors in the aggregate may not receive more than 30% of the options
and restricted stock awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
|
any non-employee director may not receive more than 5% of the options and restricted
stock awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
|
any officer or employee may not receive more than 25% of the options and restricted
stock awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
|
the options and restricted stock awards may not vest more rapidly than 20% per year;
and |
|
|
|
|
accelerated vesting is not permitted except for death, disability or upon a change
in control of Standard Bank or Standard Financial Corp. |
These restrictions do not apply to plans adopted after one year following the completion of the
stock offering.
We have not yet determined whether we will present the stock-based incentive plan for
stockholder approval within one year following the completion of the conversion or whether we will
present this plan for stockholder approval more than one year after the completion of the
conversion. In the event of changes in applicable regulations or policies regarding stock-based
incentive plans, including any regulations or policies restricting the size of awards and vesting
of benefits as described above, the restrictions described above may not be applicable.
We may obtain the shares needed for our stock-based benefit plans by issuing additional shares
of common stock from authorized but unissued shares or through stock repurchases.
Transactions with Certain Related Persons
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits us from making loans to our executive
officers and directors, but it contains a specific exemption from such prohibition for loans made
by Standard Bank to our executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking
regulations.
112
At March 31, 2010, all of our loans to directors and executive officers were made in the
ordinary course of business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to
Standard Bank, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other
unfavorable features. These loans were performing according to their original terms at March 31,
2010, and were made in compliance with federal banking regulations.
SUBSCRIPTIONS BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information regarding intended common stock subscriptions by
each of the directors and executive officers of Standard Bank and their associates, and by all
directors and executive officers as a group. However, there can be no assurance that any
individual director or executive officer, or the directors and executive officers as a group, will
purchase any specific number of shares of our common stock. In the event the individual maximum
purchase limitation is increased, persons subscribing for the maximum amount may increase their
purchase order. Directors and executive officers will purchase shares of common stock at the same
$10.00 purchase price per share and on the same terms as other purchasers in the offering. This
table excludes shares of common stock to be purchased by the employee stock ownership plan, as well
as any stock awards or stock option grants that may be made no earlier than six months after the
completion of the offering. The directors and officers have indicated their intention to subscribe
in the offering for an aggregate of $1.6 million of shares of common stock, equal to 6.3% of the
number of shares of common stock to be sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation
at the minimum of the offering range, assuming shares are available. Purchases by directors,
executive officers and their associates will be included in determining whether the required
minimum number of shares has been subscribed for in the offering. The shares being acquired by the
directors, executive officers and their associates are being acquired for investment purposes, and
not with a view towards resale. Subscriptions by management through our 401(k) plan will be
counted as part of the maximum number of shares such individuals may subscribe for in the stock
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Percent at Minimum |
|
Name |
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Purchase Price |
|
|
of Offering Range |
|
Terence L. Graft |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
* |
% |
Dale A. Walker |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David C. Mathews |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William T. Ferri |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Horace G. Cofer |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Thomas J. Rennie |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Timothy K. Zimmerman |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Colleen M. Brown |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Paul A. Knapp |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
THE CONVERSION
The Board of Directors of Standard Mutual Holding Company has approved the plan of conversion.
The plan of conversion must also be approved by the depositors of Standard Bank. A special
meeting of depositors of Standard Bank has been called for this purpose. The Pennsylvania
Department of Banking has conditionally approved the plan of conversion and related transactions
necessary to complete the conversion transaction and we expect to receive the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board of our holding company application subject to certain standard commitments on
our part, including that we complete the conversion in compliance with specified provisions of the
mutual-to-stock conversion regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision. However, such conditional approval
or non-objection does not constitute recommendations or endorsements of the plan of conversion by
such agencies.
General
Pursuant to the plan of conversion, our organization will convert from the mutual holding
company form of organization to the fully stock form. Standard Mutual Holding Company, the mutual
holding company parent of Standard Bank, will be merged into Standard Financial Corp., through one
or more transactions, with Standard Financial Corp. as the surviving entity, whereby Standard Bank
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Standard Financial Corp. As part of the conversion,
Standard Financial Corp. will offer for sale shares of its common stock. When the conversion and
offering are completed, all of the outstanding common stock of Standard Bank will be owned by
Standard Financial Corp., and all of the outstanding common stock of Standard Financial Corp. will
be owned by public stockholders.
In connection with the conversion, we intend to establish a charitable foundation, named
Standard Charitable Foundation. Subject to separate approval by the depositors of Standard Bank,
the charitable foundation will be funded with $200,000 in cash and a number of shares of Standard
Financial Corp. common stock equal to 3.5% of the shares sold in the offering.
Standard Financial Corp. intends to contribute between $12.1 million and $16.5 million of the
net proceeds, or $19.1 million if the offering range is increased by 15%, to Standard Bank and to
retain between $9.8 million and $13.5 million of the net proceeds, or $15.6 million if the offering
range is increased by 15% (excluding the portion of the net proceeds loaned to our employee stock
ownership plan and the cash contributed to the charitable foundation). The conversion will be
consummated only upon the issuance of at least the minimum number of shares of our common stock
offered pursuant to the plan of conversion.
The plan of conversion provides that we will offer shares of common stock in a subscription
offering in the following descending order of priority:
|
(1) |
|
First, to depositors with accounts at Standard Bank with aggregate balances of
at least $50.00 at the close of business on March 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Second, to our tax-qualified employee benefit plans, including our employee
stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan, which will receive nontransferable subscription
rights to purchase in the aggregate up to 10.0% of the shares of common stock sold in
the offering and issued to the charitable foundation. |
|
(3) |
|
Third, to depositors with accounts at Standard Bank with aggregate balances of
at least $50.00 at the close of business on June 30, 2010. |
114
|
(4) |
|
Fourth, to depositors of Standard Bank at the close of business on July 28,
2010. |
Shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering may be offered for sale to
the general public in a community offering, with a preference given to natural persons and trusts
of natural persons residing in the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford,
and Allegany County, Maryland. See Community Offering.
The shares of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering or community offering
may be offered to the general public on a best efforts basis in a syndicated community offering
to be managed by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated. In such capacity, Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company may form a syndicate of other broker-dealers. See Syndicated Community Offering.
We have the right to accept or reject orders received in a community offering or syndicated
community offering at our sole discretion. The community offering and/or syndicated community
offering may begin at any time following the commencement of the subscription offering and must be
completed within 45 days after the completion of the subscription offering unless otherwise
extended by us, with regulatory approval.
We determined the number of shares of common stock to be offered for sale based upon an
independent valuation of the estimated pro forma market value of Standard Financial Corp. All
shares of common stock to be sold in the offering will be sold at $10.00 per share. Investors will
not be charged a commission to purchase shares of common stock in the offering. The independent
valuation will be updated and the final number of the shares of common stock to be issued in the
offering will be determined at the completion of the offering. See Share Pricing and Number of
Shares to be Issued for more information as to the determination of the estimated pro forma market
value of the common stock.
The following is a brief summary of the conversion and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the provisions of the plan of conversion. A copy of the plan of conversion is
available for inspection at each banking office of Standard Bank. The plan of conversion is part
of the applications filed by Standard Mutual Holding Company with the Federal Reserve Board and the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking, and is included as an exhibit to Standard Financial Corp.s
Registration Statement on Form S-1, which is accessible on the Securities and Exchange Commission
website, www.sec.gov. See Where You Can Find Additional Information.
Reasons for the Conversion
While Standard Bank currently exceeds all regulatory capital requirements, the proceeds from
the sale of common stock will increase our capital, which will support our continued lending and
operations growth. In deciding to pursue the conversion and offering at this time our Board of
Directors considered current market conditions, the amount of capital needed for continued growth
and that the offering will not raise excessive capital.
Our Board of Directors decided at this time to convert to a fully public stock form of
ownership and conduct the offering in order to increase our capital position. Completing the
offering is necessary for us to continue to grow and execute our business strategy.
Additionally, we considered the following reasons for converting and raising additional
capital :
|
|
|
to support our internal growth through lending (with a particular emphasis
on commercial real estate lending) in communities we serve or may serve in the future;
|
115
|
|
|
to provide additional financial resources to pursue future expansion and
acquisition opportunities, although we have no current arrangements or agreements with
respect to any such acquisitions; |
|
|
|
to improve our capital position during a period of significant economic
uncertainty; |
|
|
|
to provide us with better capital management tools, including the ability
to pay dividends and to repurchase shares of our common stock, subject to market
conditions; |
|
|
|
to assist us in managing interest rate risk; |
|
|
|
to form a charitable foundation to benefit the communities we serve; and |
|
|
|
to retain and attract qualified personnel by establishing stock-based
benefit plans. |
We believe that the conversion and the additional capital raised in the offering will enable
us to take advantage of business opportunities that may not otherwise be available to us. As a
fully converted stock holding company, we will have greater flexibility in structuring mergers and
acquisitions, including the form of consideration that we can use to pay for an acquisition. Our
current mutual holding company has no ability to issue common stock. Potential sellers often want
stock for at least part of the purchase price. Our new stock holding company structure will enable
us to offer stock or cash consideration, or a combination of stock and cash, and will therefore
enhance our ability to compete with other bidders when acquisition opportunities arise. We have no
current arrangements or agreements with respect to any such acquisitions.
While the offering will also improve our capital position, as of June 30, 2010, Standard Bank
was considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes and is not subject to a directive or a
recommendation from the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or the Federal Reserve Board to raise capital.
Approvals Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total eligible votes of depositors of Standard Bank
at the special meeting of depositors is required to approve each of the plan of conversion and the
establishment and funding of the charitable foundation. A special meeting of depositors to
consider and vote upon the plan of conversion and the establishment and funding of the charitable
foundation has been scheduled for September 23, 2010.
The plan of conversion and related transaction necessary to complete the conversion
transaction also must be approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, which has given its
conditional approval. In addition, in order to complete our conversation, our application to
become a bank holding company, which included a copy of the plan of conversion as a exhibit
thereto, must be approved by the Federal Reserve Board. We expect to receive the approval of the
Federal Reserve Board of our application subject to certain standard commitments on our part,
including that we complete the conversion in compliance with specified provisions of the
mutual-to-stock conversion regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision. However, such
conditional approval or non-objection does not constitute recommendations or endorsements of the
plan of conversion by such agencies.
116
Effects of Conversion on Depositors
Continuity. While the conversion is being accomplished, our normal business of accepting
deposits and making loans will continue without interruption. Standard Bank will continue to be a
Pennsylvania chartered savings bank and will continue to be regulated by the Pennsylvania
Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. After the conversion, we will
continue to offer existing services to depositors, borrowers and other customers. The directors
serving Standard Bank at the time of the conversion will be the directors of Standard Bank and of
Standard Financial Corp. after the conversion.
Effect on Deposit Accounts. Pursuant to the plan of conversion, each depositor of Standard
Bank at the time of the conversion will automatically continue as a depositor after the conversion,
and the deposit balance, interest rate and other terms of such deposit accounts will not change as
a result of the conversion. Each such account will be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation to the same extent as before the conversion. Depositors will continue to hold their
existing certificates and other evidences of their accounts.
Effect on Loans. No loan outstanding from Standard Bank will be affected by the conversion,
and the amount, interest rate, maturity and security for each loan will remain as it was
contractually fixed prior to the conversion.
Effect on Voting Rights of Depositors. At present, although Standard Bank depositors do not
have voting rights in Standard Mutual Holding Company, they will be voting on the approval of the
plan of conversion due to regulatory requirements. Upon completion of the conversion, all voting
rights in Standard Bank after the conversion will be vested in Standard Financial Corp. as the sole
stockholder of Standard Bank, and the stockholders of Standard Financial Corp. will possess
exclusive voting rights with respect to Standard Financial Corp.
Tax Effects. We will receive an opinion of counsel or tax advisor with regard to federal and
state income tax consequences of the conversion to the effect that the conversion will not be
taxable for federal or state income tax purposes to Standard Bank, Standard Mutual Holding Company
or depositors of Standard Bank. See Material Income Tax Consequences.
Effect on Liquidation Rights. Each depositor in Standard Bank has both a deposit account in
Standard Bank and a pro rata ownership interest in the net worth of Standard Mutual Holding Company
based upon the deposit balance in his or her account. This ownership interest is tied to the
depositors account and has no tangible market value separate from the deposit account. This
interest may only be realized in the event of a complete liquidation of Standard Mutual Holding
Company and Standard Bank. Any depositor who opens a deposit account obtains a pro rata ownership
interest in Standard Mutual Holding Company without any additional payment beyond the amount of the
deposit. A depositor who reduces or closes his or her account receives a portion or all of the
balance in the deposit account but nothing for his or her ownership interest in the net worth of
Standard Mutual Holding Company, which is lost to the extent that the balance in the account is
reduced or closed.
Consequently, depositors in a stock subsidiary of a mutual holding company normally have no
way of realizing the value of their ownership interest, which has realizable value only in the
unlikely event that Standard Mutual Holding Company and Standard Bank are liquidated. If this
occurs, the depositors of record at that time, as owners, would share pro rata in any residual
surplus and reserves of Standard Mutual Holding Company after other claims, including claims of
depositors to the amounts of their deposits are paid.
117
Under the plan of conversion, however, Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible
Account Holders will receive rights in liquidation accounts maintained by Standard Financial Corp.
and Standard Bank representing the total equity of Standard Mutual Holding Company as of the date
of the latest statement of financial condition of Standard Mutual Holding Company prior to the
consummation of the conversion. Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank shall continue to hold
the liquidation accounts for the benefit of Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible
Account Holders who continue to maintain deposits in Standard Bank. The liquidation accounts are
also designed to provide payments to depositors of their liquidation interests in the event of a
liquidation of Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank or solely of Standard Bank. The
liquidation account in Standard Bank would be used only in the event that Standard Financial Corp.
does not have sufficient capital to fund its obligation under its liquidation account. The total
obligation of Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank under their respective liquidation
accounts will never exceed the dollar amount of the Standard Financial Corp. liquidation account.
A post-conversion merger, consolidation, sale of bulk assets or similar combination or transaction
with another insured savings institution or depository institution holding company would not be
considered a liquidation and, in such a transaction, the liquidation account would be assumed by
the surviving institution or company. See Liquidation Rights.
Share Pricing and Number of Shares to be Issued
The plan of conversion and federal regulations require that the aggregate purchase price of
the common stock sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation be based on the
appraised pro forma market value of the common stock, as determined by an independent valuation.
We have retained RP Financial, LC. to prepare an independent valuation appraisal. For its services
in preparing the initial valuation, RP Financial will receive a fee of $50,000 and will be
reimbursed for its expenses. RP Financial will receive an additional fee of $5,000 for each update
to the valuation appraisal. We have agreed to indemnify RP Financial and its employees and
affiliates against specified losses, including any losses in connection with claims under the
federal securities laws, arising out of its services as independent appraiser, except where such
liability results from its negligence or bad faith.
The independent valuation appraisal considered the pro forma impact of the offering.
Consistent with applicable appraisal guidelines, the appraisal applied three primary methodologies:
the pro forma price-to-book value approach applied to both reported book value and tangible book
value; the pro forma price-to-earnings approach applied to reported and core earnings; and the pro
forma price-to-assets approach. Based on RP Financials belief that asset size is not a strong
determinant of market value, RP Financial did not place significant weight on the pro forma
price-to-assets approach in reaching its conclusions. RP Financial placed the greatest emphasis on
the price-to-earnings and price-to-book approaches in estimating pro forma market value. The
market value ratios applied in the three methodologies were based upon the current market
valuations of a peer group companies identified by RP Financial, subject to valuation adjustments
applied by RP Financial to account for differences between us and the peer group.
Valuation adjustments were applied in nine general areas. Based on its analysis, RP Financial
applied slight upward valuation adjustments in the areas of financial condition and
profitability, growth and viability of earnings. The upward adjustment for financial condition was
based primarily upon our more attractive credit quality ratios and higher pro forma capital levels
than the peer group averages. The upward adjustment for profitability, growth and viability of
earnings was based primarily on our higher return on assets, stronger credit quality, and
comparable interest rate risk versus the peer group with these strengths offset somewhat by the
lower pro forma return on equity when compared to the peer group. RP Financial applied a moderate
downward valuation adjustment for our market area, based upon less favorable demographic measures
for our primary market area (negative projected trends in population, lower or comparable per
capita income, and lower deposit market share) versus the averages for the
118
primary market areas of the peer group. RP Financial applied a moderate to sizeable
downward adjustment for marketing of the common stock, reflecting the discounting required by the
market relative to seasoned public companies to purchase a new issue with no prior trading history
as a stock-owned company. Based on the comparability of factors between our operations and the
peer group averages, RP Financial applied no adjustment to the valuation in the areas of asset
growth, dividends, liquidity of the shares, management and effect of government regulations and
regulatory reform.
The independent valuation was prepared by RP Financial in reliance upon the information
contained in this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements. RP Financial also
considered the following factors, among others:
|
|
|
our present and projected results and financial condition; |
|
|
|
the economic and demographic conditions in our existing market area; |
|
|
|
certain historical, financial and other information relating to us; |
|
|
|
a comparative evaluation of our operating and financial characteristics with those
of other similarly situated publicly traded savings institutions; |
|
|
|
the impact of the conversion and the offering on our equity and earnings potential; |
|
|
|
our potential to pay cash dividends; |
|
|
|
the trading market for securities of comparable institutions and general conditions
in the market for such securities; and |
|
|
|
the issuance of shares and contribution of cash to the charitable foundation. |
Included in the independent valuation were certain assumptions as to our pro forma earnings
after the conversion that were utilized in determining the appraised value. These assumptions
included estimated expenses, an assumed after-tax rate of return of 1.68% on the net offering
proceeds and purchases in the open market of 4.14% of the common stock issued in the offering by
the stock-based benefit plans at the $10.00 purchase price. See Pro Forma Data for additional
information concerning these assumptions. The use of different assumptions may yield different
results.
The independent valuation states that as of May 28, 2010, the estimated pro forma market value
of Standard Financial Corp. ranged from $26.4 million to $41.1 million, with a midpoint of $31.1
million. Our Board of Directors decided to offer the shares of common stock for a price of $10.00
per share primarily because it is the price most commonly used in mutual-to-stock conversions of
financial institutions. The number of shares offered will be equal to the aggregate offering price
of the shares divided by the price per share. Based on the valuation range and the $10.00 price
per share, the minimum of the offering range will be 2,550,000 shares, the midpoint of the offering
range will be 3,000,000 shares and the maximum of the offering range will be 3,450,000 shares, or
3,967,500 shares if the maximum amount is adjusted because of demand for shares or changes in
market conditions.
The appraisal peer group consists of the following ten companies that RP Financial considered
comparable to us, with asset size as of March 31, 2010.
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
Company Name |
|
Ticker Symbol |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Headquarters |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. |
|
CZWI |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Eau Claire, WI |
|
$ |
577 |
|
Elmira Savings Bank, FSB |
|
ESBK |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Elmira, NY |
|
$ |
489 |
|
First Capital, Inc. |
|
FCAP |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Corydon, IN |
|
$ |
463 |
|
First Savings Financial Group |
|
FSFG |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Clarksville, IN |
|
$ |
494 |
|
Harleysville Savings Financial Corp. |
|
HARL |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Harleysville, PA |
|
$ |
843 |
|
River Valley Bancorp |
|
RIVR |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Madison, IN |
|
$ |
395 |
|
Rome Bancorp, Inc. |
|
ROME |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Rome, NY |
|
$ |
328 |
|
TF Financial Corp. |
|
THRD |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Newtown, PA |
|
$ |
716 |
|
Wayne Savings Bancshares |
|
WAYN |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Wooster, OH |
|
$ |
406 |
|
WVS Financial Corp. |
|
WVFC |
|
NASDAQ |
|
Pittsburgh, PA |
|
$ |
377 |
|
The following table presents a summary of selected pricing ratios for the peer group
companies and Standard (on a pro forma basis). The pricing ratios are based on earnings and other
information as of and for the six months ended March 31, 2010, stock price information as of May
28, 2010, as reflected in RP Financial, LC.s appraisal report, dated May 28, 2010, and the number
of shares outstanding as described in Pro Forma Data. Compared to the average pricing of the
peer group, our pro forma pricing ratios at the maximum of the offering range indicated a discount
of 38.1% on a price-to-book value basis, a discount of 35.2% on a price-to-tangible book value
basis, and a discount of 2.9% on a price-to-earnings basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price-to-earnings |
|
|
Price-to-book |
|
|
Price-to-tangible |
|
|
|
multiple(1) |
|
|
value ratio |
|
|
book value ratio |
|
Standard (on a pro
forma basis,
assuming completion
of the conversion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
11.01x |
|
|
|
40.78 |
% |
|
|
47.98 |
% |
Midpoint |
|
|
12.94x |
|
|
|
45.23 |
% |
|
|
52.69 |
% |
Maximum |
|
|
14.86x |
|
|
|
49.16 |
% |
|
|
56.75 |
% |
Maximum, as adjusted |
|
|
17.06x |
|
|
|
53.22 |
% |
|
|
60.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of peer
group companies, as
of May 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Averages |
|
|
15.30x |
|
|
|
79.38 |
% |
|
|
87.62 |
% |
Medians |
|
|
12.79x |
|
|
|
80.81 |
% |
|
|
88.09 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information is derived from the RP Financial appraisal report and are based upon reported
earnings for the twelve months ended March 31, 2010. These ratios are different from the
ratios in Pro Forma Data. |
Compared to the median pricing of the peer group, our pro forma pricing ratios at the
maximum of the offering range indicated a discount of 39.2% on a price-to-book value basis, a
discount of 35.6% on a price-to-tangible book value basis, and a premium of 16.2% on a core
price-to-earnings basis.
Our Board of Directors reviewed the independent valuation and, in particular, considered the
following:
|
|
|
our financial condition and results of operations; |
|
|
|
comparison of our financial performance ratios to those of other financial
institutions of similar size; |
|
|
|
market conditions generally and, in particular, for financial institutions; and |
|
|
|
the issuance of shares and contribution of cash to the charitable foundation. |
120
All of these factors are set forth in the independent valuation. Our Board of Directors also
reviewed the methodology and the assumptions used by RP Financial in preparing the independent
valuation and believes that such assumptions were reasonable. The offering range may be amended
with regulatory approval if required as a result of subsequent developments in our financial
condition or market conditions generally. In the event the independent valuation is updated to
amend our pro forma market value to less than $26.4 million or more than $41.1 million, the
appraisal will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by a post-effective amendment
to our registration statement.
The independent valuation is not intended, and must not be construed, as a recommendation of
any kind as to the advisability of purchasing shares of our common stock. RP Financial did not
independently verify our consolidated financial statements and other information that we provided
to them, nor did RP Financial independently value our assets or liabilities. The independent
valuation considers Standard Bank as a going concern and should not be considered as an indication
of the liquidation value of Standard Bank. Moreover, because the valuation is necessarily based
upon estimates and projections of a number of matters, all of which may change from time to time,
no assurance can be given that persons purchasing our common stock in the offering will thereafter
be able to sell their shares at prices at or above the $10.00 offering price per share.
Following commencement of the subscription offering, the maximum of the valuation range may be
increased by up to 15%, or up to $41.1 million, without resoliciting subscribers, which would
result in a corresponding increase of up to 15% in the maximum of the offering range to up to
3,967,500 shares, to reflect changes in market and financial conditions or demand for the shares.
We will not decrease the minimum of the valuation range below $26.4 million or increase the range
above $41.1 million (including the value of shares issued to the charitable foundation) (following
the completion of any authorized extension of the offering) and sell more than 3,967,500 shares or
less then 2,550,000 shares without cancelling subscribers orders, returning all funds with
interest calculated at our statement savings rate, cancelling deposit account withdrawal
authorizations and establishing a new offering range. Subscribers will be given an opportunity to
place a new stock order. The subscription price of $10.00 per share will remain fixed. See
Limitations on Common Stock Purchases as to the method of distribution and allocation of
additional shares that may be issued in the event of an increase in the offering range.
In the event that we extend the offering without changing the stock offering range and conduct
a resolicitation, we will notify subscribers of the extension of time and of the rights of
subscribers to maintain, change or cancel their stock orders within a specified period. If a
subscriber does not respond during the period, his or her stock order will be cancelled and payment
will be returned promptly, with interest calculated at our statement savings rate, and deposit
account withdrawal authorizations will be cancelled.
An increase in the number of shares to be issued in the offering would decrease a subscribers
ownership interest and our pro forma stockholders equity on a per share basis while increasing pro
forma stockholders equity on an aggregate basis. A decrease in the number of shares to be issued
in the offering would increase both a subscribers ownership interest and our pro forma
stockholders equity on a per share basis, while decreasing pro forma stockholders equity on an
aggregate basis. For a presentation of the effects of these changes, see Pro Forma Data.
Copies of the independent valuation appraisal report of RP Financial and the detailed
memorandum setting forth the method and assumptions used in the appraisal report are available for
inspection at our executive office and as specified under Where You Can Find Additional
Information.
121
Subscription Offering and Subscription Rights
In accordance with the plan of conversion, rights to subscribe for shares of common stock in
the subscription offering have been granted in the following descending order of priority. The
filling of subscriptions that we receive will depend on the availability of common stock after
satisfaction of all subscriptions of all persons having prior rights in the subscription offering
and to the maximum, minimum and overall purchase limitations set forth in the plan of conversion
and as described below under Limitations on Common Stock Purchases.
Priority 1: Eligible Account Holders. Each depositor with aggregate deposit account balances
of $50.00 or more (a Qualifying Deposit) on March 31, 2009 (an Eligible Account Holder) will
receive, without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase, subject to the
overall purchase limitations, up to the greater of 20,000 shares of our common stock, 0.10% of the
total number of shares of common stock sold in the offering, or 15 times the number of subscription
shares offered multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator is the aggregate Qualifying Deposit
account balances of the Eligible Account Holder and the denominator is the aggregate Qualifying
Deposit account balances of all Eligible Account Holders. See Limitations on Common Stock
Purchases. If there are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, shares will
first be allocated so as to permit each Eligible Account Holder to purchase a number of shares
sufficient to make his or her total allocation equal to the lesser of 100 shares or the number of
shares for which he or she subscribed. Thereafter, unallocated shares will be allocated to each
Eligible Account Holder whose subscription remains unfilled in the proportion that the amount of
his or her Qualifying Deposit bears to the total amount of Qualifying Deposits of all subscribing
Eligible Account Holders whose subscriptions remain unfilled. If an amount so allocated exceeds
the amount subscribed for by any one or more Eligible Account Holders, the excess shall be
reallocated (one or more times as necessary) among those Eligible Account Holders whose
subscriptions are not fully satisfied until all available shares have been allocated.
To ensure proper allocation of shares of our common stock, each Eligible Account Holder must
list on his or her stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she has an ownership
interest on March 31, 2009. In the event of oversubscription, failure to list an account could
result in fewer shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed. In the event of an
oversubscription, the subscription rights of Eligible Account Holders who are also our directors or
executive officers and their associates will be subordinated to the subscription rights of other
Eligible Account Holders to the extent attributable to increased deposits during the year preceding
March 31, 2009.
Priority 2: Tax-Qualified Plans. Our tax-qualified employee benefit plans, including our
employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan, will receive, without payment therefor,
nontransferable subscription rights to purchase in the aggregate up to 10% of the shares of common
stock sold in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation. We expect our employee stock
ownership plan to purchase 8% of the shares of common stock sold in the offering and issued to the
charitable foundation. If market conditions warrant, the employee stock ownership plan may instead
elect to purchase shares in the open market following the completion of the conversion. The amount
of the subscription requests by the 401(k) plan will be determined by its participants, who will
have the right to invest all or a portion of their 401(k) plan accounts in our common stock,
subject to the maximum purchase limitations.
Priority 3: Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. To the extent that there are sufficient
shares of common stock remaining after satisfaction of subscriptions by Eligible Account Holders
and our tax-qualified employee benefit plans, each depositor with a Qualifying Deposit on June 30,
2010 who is not an Eligible Account Holder (Supplemental Eligible Account Holder) will receive,
without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase up to the greater of
20,000 shares of common stock, 0.10% of the total number of shares of common stock sold in the
offering, or 15 times the number of subscription shares offered multiplied by a fraction of which
the numerator is the Qualifying Deposit of
122
the Supplemental Eligible Account Holder and the denominator is the aggregate Qualifying
Deposits of all Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, subject to the overall purchase limitations.
See Limitations on Common Stock Purchases. If there are not sufficient shares available to
satisfy all subscriptions, shares will be allocated so as to permit each Supplemental Eligible
Account Holder to purchase a number of shares sufficient to make his or her total allocation equal
to the lesser of 100 shares of common stock or the number of shares for which he or she subscribed.
Thereafter, unallocated shares will be allocated to each Supplemental Eligible Account Holder
whose subscription remains unfilled in the proportion that the amount of his or her Qualifying
Deposit bears to the total amount of Qualifying Deposits of all Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders whose subscriptions remain unfilled. If an amount so allocated exceeds the amount
subscribed for by any one or more Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, the excess shall be
reallocated (one or more times as necessary) among those Supplemental Eligible Account Holders
whose subscriptions are not fully satisfied until all available shares have been allocated.
To ensure proper allocation of common stock, each Supplemental Eligible Account Holder must
list on the stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she has an ownership interest at
June 30, 2010. In the event of oversubscription, failure to list an account could result in fewer
shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed.
Priority 4: Other Depositors. To the extent that there are shares of common stock remaining
after satisfaction of subscriptions by Eligible Account Holders, our tax-qualified employee benefit
plans and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders, each depositor as of July 28, 2010 who is not an
Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental Eligible Account Holder (Other Depositors) will receive,
without payment therefor, nontransferable subscription rights to purchase up to the greater of
20,000 shares of common stock or 0.10% of the total number of shares of common stock sold in the
offering, subject to the overall purchase limitations. See Limitations on Common Stock
Purchases. If there are not sufficient shares available to satisfy all subscriptions, available
shares will be allocated so as to permit each Other Depositor to purchase a number of shares
sufficient to make his or her total allocation equal to the lesser of 100 shares of common stock or
the number of shares for which he or she subscribed. Thereafter, unallocated shares will be
allocated to each Other Depositor whose subscription remains unfilled in the proportion that the
amount of his or her subscription bears to the total amount of subscriptions of all Other
Depositors whose subscriptions remain unfilled. To ensure proper allocation of common stock, each
Other Depositor must list on the stock order form all deposit accounts in which he or she had an
ownership interest at July 28, 2010. In the event of an oversubscription, failure to list an
account could result in fewer shares being allocated than if all accounts had been disclosed.
Expiration Date. The Subscription Offering will expire at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
September 17, 2010, unless extended by us for up to 45 days or for additional periods with
regulatory approval. Subscription rights will expire whether or not each eligible depositor can be
located. We may decide to extend the expiration date of the subscription offering for any reason,
whether or not subscriptions have been received for shares at the minimum, midpoint or maximum of
the offering range. Subscription rights that have not been exercised prior to the expiration date
will become void.
We will not execute orders until we have received orders to purchase at least the minimum
number of shares of common stock. If we have not received orders to purchase at least 2,550,000
shares within 45 days after the expiration date and we have not received regulatory approval for an
extension, all funds delivered to us to purchase shares of common stock in the offering will be
returned promptly to the subscribers with interest calculated at our statement savings rate, all
deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be cancelled and the offering will be terminated.
If regulatory consent for an extension beyond November 1, 2010 is granted, we will resolicit
subscribers as described under Procedure for Purchasing SharesExpiration Date. Aggregate
extensions may not go beyond September 23, 2012, which is two years after the special meeting of
depositors to vote on the conversion.
123
Community Offering
To the extent that shares of common stock remain available for purchase after satisfaction of
all subscriptions of the Eligible Account Holders, our tax-qualified employee benefit plans,
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Depositors, we may offer shares pursuant to the
plan of conversion to members of the general public in a community offering. Shares may be offered
with a preference to natural persons and trusts of natural persons residing in the Pennsylvania
counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford, and Allegany County, Maryland, and thereafter to
other members of the general public.
Persons who place orders in the community offering may purchase up to 20,000 shares of common
stock, subject to the overall purchase limitations. See Limitations on Common Stock Purchases.
The opportunity to purchase shares of common stock in the community offering category is subject to
our right, in our sole discretion, to accept or reject any such orders in whole or in part either
at the time of receipt of an order or as soon as practicable following the expiration date of the
offering. We have not established any set criteria for determining whether to accept or reject a
purchase order in the community offering. Any determination to accept or reject purchase orders in
the community offering will be based on the facts and circumstances known to us at the time.
If we do not have sufficient shares of common stock available to fill the orders of natural
persons and trusts of natural persons residing in the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny,
Westmoreland and Bedford and Allegany County, Maryland, we will allocate the available shares among
those residents in a manner that permits each of them, to the extent possible, to purchase the
lesser of 100 shares, or the number of shares ordered by such person. Thereafter, unallocated
shares will be allocated among residents whose orders remain unsatisfied on an equal number of
shares basis per order. If instead, oversubscription occurs among members of the general public,
we will allocate the available shares among those persons in the same manner described above.
The term residing or resident as used in this prospectus means any person who occupies a
dwelling within the Pennsylvania counties of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford, or Allegany
County, Maryland, has a present intent to remain within the community for a period of time and
manifests the genuineness of that intent by establishing an ongoing physical presence within the
community, together with an indication that this presence within the community is something other
than merely transitory in nature. We may utilize deposit or loan records or other evidence
provided to us to decide whether a person is a resident. In all cases, however, the determination
shall be in our sole discretion.
Expiration Date. The community offering may begin at the same time as, during or after the
subscription offering. It is currently expected to terminate at the same time as the subscription
offering, although it must terminate no more than 45 days following the subscription offering. We
may decide to extend the community offering for any reason and are not required to give purchasers
notice of any such extension unless such period extends beyond November 1, 2010. If regulatory
approval for an extension beyond November 1, 2010 is granted, we will resolicit subscribers as
described under Procedure for Purchasing SharesExpiration Date. Extensions may not go beyond
September 23, 2012, which is two years after the special meeting of depositors to vote on the
conversion.
Syndicated Community Offering
As a final step in the conversion, the plan of conversion provides that, if feasible, shares
of common stock not purchased in the subscription offering and community offering, may be offered
for sale to members of the general public in a syndicated community offering through a syndicate of
registered broker-dealers managed by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated. We expect that the
syndicated community offering, if any, will begin as soon as practicable after termination of the
subscription offering
124
and the community offering. We, in our sole discretion, have the right to reject orders, in whole
or in part, received in the syndicated community offering. Neither Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated nor any registered broker-dealer shall have any obligation to take or purchase any
shares of common stock in the syndicated community offering; however, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated has agreed to use its best efforts in the sale of shares in any syndicated community
offering.
The price at which common stock is sold in the syndicated community offering will be the same
$10.00 price at which shares are offered and sold in the subscription offering and community
offering. Each person may purchase up to 20,000 shares of common stock in the syndicated community
offering, subject to the maximum purchase limitations. See Limitations on Common Stock
Purchases. In connection with the allocation process, unless we receive regulatory approval to
allocate shares in a different manner, orders received for shares of common stock in the syndicated
community offering will first be filled up to a maximum of 2% of the shares sold in the offering,
and thereafter any remaining shares will be allocated on an equal number of shares basis per order
until all shares have been allocated.
If a syndicated community offering is held, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will
serve as sole book running manager. In such capacity, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated may
form a syndicate of other broker-dealers who are Financial Industry Regulatory Authority member
firms. Neither Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated nor any registered broker-dealer will have
any obligation to take or purchase any shares of the common stock in the syndicated community
offering. The syndicated community offering will be conducted in accordance with certain
Securities and Exchange Commission rules applicable to best efforts offerings. Under these rules,
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated or the other broker-dealers participating in the
syndicated community offering generally will accept payment for shares of common stock to be
purchased in the syndicated community offering through a sweep arrangement under which a customers
brokerage account at the applicable participating broker-dealer will be debited in the amount of
the purchase price for the shares of common stock that such customer wishes to purchase in the
syndicated community offering on the settlement date. Customers who authorize participating
broker-dealers to debit their brokerage accounts are required to have the funds for the payment in
their accounts on, but not before, the settlement date. The sweep arrangements will meet the
following conditions: (i) shares will only be sold to customers with accounts at Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated or at another participating broker-dealer; and (ii) accounts will not be
swept until the settlement date, which will only occur after the minimum number of shares are sold.
Institutional investors will pay Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated in its capacity as sole
book running manager, for shares purchased in the syndicated community offering on the settlement
date through the services of the Depository Trust Company on a delivery versus payment basis. The
closing of the syndicated community offering is subject to conditions set forth in an agency
agreement among Standard Mutual Holding Company, Standard Bank and Standard Financial Corp. on one
hand and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated on the other hand. If and when all the
conditions for the closing are met, funds for common stock sold in the syndicated community
offering, less fees and commissions payable by us, will be delivered promptly to us. If the
offering is consummated, but some or all of an interested investors funds are not accepted by us,
those funds will be returned to the interested investor promptly after closing, without interest.
If the offering is not consummated, funds in the account will be returned promptly, without
interest, to the potential investor. Normal customer ticketing will be used for order placement.
In the syndicated community offering, order forms will not be used.
The syndicated community offering will be completed within 45 days after the termination of
the subscription offering, unless extended by us with regulatory approval.
Limitations on Common Stock Purchases
The plan of conversion includes the following limitations on the number of shares of common
stock that may be purchased in the offering:
125
|
|
|
The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased by a person is
20,000 shares. |
|
|
|
No person or entity, together with any associate or group of persons acting in
concert, may purchase more than 30,000 shares of common stock in all categories of the
offering, combined, except that our tax-qualified employee benefit plans, including our
employee stock ownership plan and 401(k) plan, may purchase in the aggregate up to 10%
of the shares of common stock issued in the offering (including shares sold in the
event of an increase in the offering range of up to 15%) and issued to the charitable
foundation; |
|
|
|
The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be purchased in all categories
of the offering by our executive officers and directors and their associates, in the
aggregate, may not exceed 27% of the shares issued in the offering; and |
|
|
|
The minimum purchase by each person purchasing shares in the offering is 25 shares,
to the extent those shares are available. |
Depending upon market or financial conditions, our Board of Directors, with regulatory
approval and without further approval of depositors, may decrease or increase the purchase
limitations. If a purchase limitation is increased, subscribers in the subscription offering who
ordered the maximum amount and indicated on their stock order forms a desire to be resolicited will
be given the opportunity to increase their subscriptions up to the then-applicable limit. The
effect of this type of resolicitation would be an increase in the number of shares of common stock
owned by subscribers who choose to increase their subscriptions. In connection with this type of
resolicitation, we may allow payment by wire transfer and disallow payment by personal check.
In the event of an increase in the offering range of up to 15% of the total number of shares
of common stock offered in the offering and issued to the charitable foundation, shares will be
allocated in the following order of priority in accordance with the plan of conversion:
|
(1) |
|
to fill our tax-qualified employee benefit plans subscriptions for up to 10%
of the total number of shares of common stock issued in the offering and issued to the
charitable foundation; |
|
(2) |
|
in the event that there is an oversubscription at the Eligible Account Holder,
Supplemental Eligible Account Holder or Other Depositor levels, to fill unfulfilled
subscriptions of these subscribers according to their respective priorities; and |
|
(3) |
|
to fill unfulfilled subscriptions in the community offering, with preference
given first to natural persons and trusts thereof residing in the Pennsylvania counties
of Allegheny, Westmoreland and Bedford, and Allegany County, Maryland. |
The term associate of a person means:
|
(1) |
|
any corporation or organization, other than Standard Mutual Holding Company,
Standard Bank, Standard Financial Corp. or a majority-owned subsidiary of these
entities, of which the person is a senior officer, partner or 10% beneficial
stockholder; |
|
(2) |
|
any trust or other estate in which the person has a substantial beneficial
interest or serves as a trustee or in a fiduciary capacity, excluding any employee
stock benefit plan in which the person has a substantial beneficial interest or serves
as trustee or in a fiduciary capacity; and |
126
|
(3) |
|
any blood or marriage relative of the person, who either lives in the same home
as the person or who is a director or officer of Standard Bank, Standard Mutual Holding
Company or Standard Financial Corp. |
The term acting in concert means:
|
(1) |
|
knowing participation in a joint activity or interdependent conscious parallel
action towards a common goal whether or not pursuant to an express agreement; or |
|
(2) |
|
a combination or pooling of voting or other interests in the securities of an
issuer for a common purpose pursuant to any contract, understanding, relationship,
agreement or other arrangement, whether written or otherwise. |
A person or company that acts in concert with another person or company (other party) shall
also be deemed to be acting in concert with any person or company who is also acting in concert
with that other party, except that any tax-qualified employee stock benefit plan will not be deemed
to be acting in concert with its trustee or a person who serves in a similar capacity solely for
the purpose of determining whether common stock held by the trustee and common stock held by the
employee stock benefit plan will be aggregated.
Our directors are not treated as associates of each other solely because of their membership
on the Board of Directors. We have the right to determine whether prospective purchasers are
associates or acting in concert. Shares of common stock purchased in the offering will be freely
transferable except for shares purchased by our executive officers and directors and except as
described below. Any purchases made by any associate of Standard Bank or Standard Financial Corp.
for the explicit purpose of meeting the minimum number of shares of common stock required to be
sold in order to complete the offering shall be made for investment purposes only and not with a
view toward redistribution. In addition, under the guidelines of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and their associates are subject
to certain restrictions on transfer of securities purchased in accordance with subscription rights
and to certain reporting requirements upon purchase of these securities. For a further discussion
of limitations on purchases of shares of our common stock at the time of conversion and thereafter,
see Certain Restrictions on Purchase or Transfer of Our Shares After Conversion and
Restrictions on Acquisition of Standard Financial Corp.
Marketing and Distribution; Compensation
To assist in the marketing of our common stock, we have retained Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated, which is a broker-dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will act as conversion advisor with respect to the
conversion and marketing agent on a best efforts basis in the offering. The services of Stifel
Nicolaus & Company include, but are not limited to:
|
(i) |
|
acting as our financial advisor for the conversion and offering; |
|
(ii) |
|
providing administrative services and managing the Stock Information Center; |
|
(iii) |
|
educating our employees regarding the offering; |
|
(iv) |
|
targeting our sales efforts, including assisting in the preparation of marketing
materials; |
|
(v) |
|
soliciting orders for common stock; and |
127
(vi) manage proxy solicitation efforts.
For these services, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will receive an advisory and
administrative fee of $30,000 and 1% of the dollar amount of all shares of common stock sold in the
subscription and community offerings. No sales fee will be payable to Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated with respect to shares purchased by officers, directors and employees or their
immediate families, shares contributed to the charitable foundation and shares purchased by our
tax-qualified and non-qualified employee benefit plans. In the event that Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated sells common stock through a group of broker-dealers in a syndicated
community offering, it will be paid a fee equal to 1% of the dollar amount of total shares sold in
the syndicated community offering, which fee along with the fee payable to selected dealers (which
will include Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated) shall not exceed 6.0% in the aggregate.
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will serve as sole book running manager. Stifel, Nicolaus
& Company, Incorporated also will be reimbursed for allocable expenses in an amount not to exceed
$25,000 for the subscription offering and community offering and $25,000 for the syndicated
community offering. In addition, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will be reimbursed up to
$75,000 for attorneys fees.
In the event that we are required to resolicit subscribers for shares of our common stock in
the subscription and community offerings, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will be required
to provide significant additional services in connection with the resolicitation (including
repeating the services described above), and we shall pay Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
an additional fee for those services that will not exceed $30,000. In the event of a material
delay in the offering, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated also will be reimbursed for
additional allocable expenses in an amount not to exceed $15,000 and additional attorneys fees and
allocable expenses in an amount not to exceed $25,000 provided that in the aggregate, all
reimbursable expenses and legal fees shall not exceed $165,000.
We will indemnify Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated against liabilities and expenses,
including legal fees, incurred in connection with certain claims or litigation arising out of or
based upon untrue statements or omissions contained in the offering materials for the common stock,
including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
In addition, we have engaged Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated to act as our records
management agent in connection with the conversion and offering. In its role as records management
agent, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will coordinate with our data processing contacts
and interface with the Stock Information Center to provide records processing and proxy and stock
order services, including but not limited to: consolidation of deposit accounts and vote
calculation; preparation of information for order forms and proxy cards; interfacing with our
financial printer; recording stock order information; and tabulating proxy votes. For these
services, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated will receive a fee of $20,000, and we will have
made an advance payment of $5,000 with respect to this fee. We will also reimburse Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with its
acting as information agent in an amount not to exceed $5,000.
Our directors and executive officers may participate in the solicitation of offers to purchase
common stock. These persons will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with the solicitation. Other trained employees of Standard Bank or its
affiliates may assist in the offering in ministerial capacities, providing clerical work in
effecting a sales transaction or answering questions of a ministerial nature. No offers or sales
may be made by tellers or at the teller counters. No sales activity will be conducted in a
Standard Bank branch office. Investment-related questions of prospective purchasers will be
directed to executive officers or registered representatives of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company. Our
other employees have been instructed not to solicit offers to purchase shares
128
of common stock or provide advice regarding the purchase of common stock. We will rely on Rule
3a4-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and sales of common stock will be
conducted within the requirements of Rule 3a4-1, so as to permit officers, directors and employees
to participate in the sale of common stock. None of our officers, directors or employees will be
compensated in connection with their participation in the offering by the payment of commissions or
other remuneration based either directly or indirectly on the transactions in the shares of common
stock.
The offering will comply with the requirements of Rule 10b-9 under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
Prospectus Delivery
To ensure that each purchaser receives a prospectus at least 48 hours before the expiration
date of the offering in accordance with Rule 15c2-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we may
not mail a prospectus any later than five days prior to the expiration date or hand deliver any
later than two days prior to the expiration date. Execution of an order form will confirm receipt
of delivery in accordance with Rule 15c2-8. Order forms will only be distributed with or preceded
by a prospectus.
In the syndicated community offering, a prospectus in electronic format may be made available
on the Internet sites or through other online services maintained by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated or one or more other members of the syndicate, or by their respective affiliates. In
those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and, depending upon the syndicate
member, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The members of the syndicate
may agree with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to online brokerage account
holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be made on the same basis as other
allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on the Internet sites
referenced in the preceding paragraph and any information contained in any other Internet site
maintained by any member of the syndicate is not part of this prospectus or the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or by
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated or any other member of the syndicate in its capacity as
selling agent or syndicate member and should not be relied upon by investors.
Procedure for Purchasing Shares
Expiration Date. The offering will expire at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 17, 2010,
unless we extend it for up to 45 days. This extension may be approved by us, in our sole
discretion, without further approval or additional notice to subscribers in the offering. Any
extension of the subscription and/or community offering beyond November 1, 2010 would require
regulatory approval and would also require that we conduct a resolicitation of subscribers. In
such event, subscribers will have the opportunity to maintain, change or cancel their stock orders
within a specified period. If a subscriber does not respond during the resolicitation period, his
or her stock order will be cancelled and payment will be returned promptly, with interest
calculated at our statement savings rate, and deposit account withdrawal authorizations will be
cancelled.
We will not execute orders until at least the minimum number of shares offered has been sold.
If we have not sold the minimum by the expiration date or any extension thereof, we must terminate
the offering and promptly refund all funds received for shares of common stock, as described above.
Any single offering extension will not exceed 90 days; aggregate extensions may not conclude
beyond September 23, 2012, which is two years after the special meeting of depositors to vote on
the conversion.
129
We reserve the right in our sole discretion to terminate the offering at any time and for any
reason, in which case we will cancel any deposit account withdrawal orders and promptly return all
funds delivered to us, with interest at our current statement savings rate from the date the stock
order was processed.
We have the right to reject any order submitted in the offering by a person who we believe is
making false representations or who we otherwise believe, either alone or acting in concert with
others, is violating, evading, circumventing, or intends to violate, evade or circumvent the terms
and conditions of the plan of conversion.
Use of Order Forms. In order to purchase shares of common stock in the subscription offering
and community offering, you must complete an original stock order form and remit full payment. We
will not be required to accept incomplete order forms, unsigned order forms or orders submitted on
photocopied or facsimiled order forms. Stock order forms must be received (not postmarked) prior
to 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 17, 2010. We are not required to accept order forms that
are not received by that time or that are received without full payment or without appropriate
withdrawal instructions. We are not required to notify subscribers of incomplete or improperly
executed order forms. We have the right to permit the correction of incomplete or improperly
executed order forms or waive immaterial irregularities. You may submit your order form and
payment by mail using the stock order reply envelope provided or by overnight delivery to the
indicated address on the stock order form or by hand-delivery to Standard Banks executive office,
which is located at 2640 Monroeville Boulevard, Monroeville, Pennsylvania. We will not accept
stock order forms at other Standard Bank offices. Stock order forms should not be mailed to
Standard Bank. Once tendered, an order form cannot be modified or revoked without our consent. We
reserve the absolute right, in our sole discretion, to reject orders received in the community
offering, in whole or in part, at the time of receipt or at any time prior to completion of the
offering. If you are ordering shares in the subscription offering, you must represent that you are
purchasing shares for your own account and that you have no agreement or understanding with any
person for the sale or transfer of the shares. Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of
the plan of conversion and of the acceptability of the order forms will be final, subject to
regulatory authority.
By signing the order form, you will be acknowledging that the common stock is not a deposit or
savings account and is not federally insured or otherwise guaranteed by Standard Bank or the
federal government, and that you received a copy of this prospectus. However, signing the order
form will not result in you waiving your rights under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Payment for Shares. Payment for all shares of common stock will be required to accompany all
completed order forms for the purchase to be valid. Payment for shares may be made by:
|
(1) |
|
personal check, bank check or money order, payable to Standard Financial Corp.;
or |
|
(2) |
|
authorization of withdrawal from the types of Standard Bank deposit accounts
designated on the order form. |
Appropriate means for designating withdrawals from deposit accounts at Standard Bank are
provided in the order forms. The funds designated must be available in the account(s) at the time
the order form is received. A hold will be placed on these funds, making them unavailable to the
depositor. Funds authorized for withdrawal will continue to earn interest within the account at the
contract rate until the offering is completed, at which time the designated withdrawal will be
made. Interest penalties for early withdrawal applicable to certificate accounts will not apply to
withdrawals authorized for the purchase of shares of common stock; however, if a withdrawal results
in a certificate account with a balance less than the applicable minimum balance requirement, the
certificate will be cancelled at the time of withdrawal without penalty and the remaining balance
will be transferred to a savings account and
130
earn interest calculated at the statement savings rate current at the time. In the case of
payments made by personal check, these funds must be available in the account(s). Payments made by
check or money order will be immediately cashed and placed in a segregated account at Standard Bank
and will earn interest at our statement savings rate until the offering is completed or terminated.
You may not remit cash, wire transfers, Standard Bank line of credit checks, or third-party
checks (including those payable to you and endorsed over to Standard Financial Corp.). You may not
designate on your stock order form a direct withdrawal from a Standard Bank retirement account.
See Using IRA Funds to Purchase Shares for information on using such funds. Additionally, you
may not designate a direct withdrawal from Standard Bank accounts with check-writing privileges.
Please provide a check instead. If you request direct withdrawal, we reserve the right to
interpret that as your authorization to treat those funds as if we had received a check for the
designated amount, and we will immediately withdraw that amount from your checking account. If
permitted by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board, in the event we
resolicit large subscribers in the Subscription Offering, as described above in Limitations on
Common Stock Purchases, such purchasers who wish to increase their purchases will not be able to
use personal checks to pay for the additional shares and may be able to pay by wire transfer.
Once we receive your executed order form, it may not be modified, amended or rescinded without
our consent, unless the offering is not completed by November 1, 2010, as described in Procedure
for Purchasing SharesExpiration Date.
We will have the right, in our sole discretion, to permit institutional investors to submit
irrevocable orders together with the legally binding commitment for payment and to thereafter pay
for the shares of common stock for which they subscribe in the syndicated community offering at any
time prior to the completion of the offering. This payment may be made by wire transfer.
Our employee stock ownership plan will not be required to pay for any shares purchased in the
offering until consummation of the offering, provided there is a loan commitment from an unrelated
financial institution or Standard Financial Corp. to lend to the employee stock ownership plan the
necessary amount to fund the purchase.
Regulations prohibit Standard Bank from knowingly lending funds or extending credit to any
persons to purchase shares of common stock in the offering.
Using IRA Funds to Purchase Shares. If you are interested in using your individual retirement
account (IRA) funds, or any other retirement account funds, to purchase shares of common stock,
you must do so through a self-directed retirement account, such as offered by brokerage firms. By
regulation, Standard Banks retirement accounts are not self-directed, so they cannot be invested
in our shares of common stock. Therefore, if you wish to use your funds that are currently in a
Standard Bank retirement account, you may not designate on the stock order form that you wish funds
to be withdrawn from the account for the purchase of common stock. Before you place your order,
the funds you wish to use for the purchase of common stock will have to be transferred to another
bank or a brokerage account offering self-directed accounts. There will be no early withdrawal or
interest penalties for these transfers. The new trustee or custodian will hold the shares of common
stock in a self-directed account in the same manner as we now hold the depositors retirement
account funds. An annual administrative fee may be payable to the new trustee or custodian.
Assistance on how to transfer retirement accounts maintained at Standard Bank can be obtained from
the Stock Information Center. Subscribers interested in using funds in an IRA or any other
retirement account, whether held at Standard Bank or elsewhere, to purchase shares of common stock,
should contact our Stock Information Center for guidance as soon as possible, preferably at least
two weeks prior to the September 17, 2010 offering deadline. Processing such transactions takes
additional time, and whether such funds can be used may depend on limitations imposed by the
131
institutions where such funds are currently held. We cannot guarantee that you will be able to use
such funds.
Delivery of Shares of Common Stock in the Subscription and Community Offerings. Stock
certificates will not be issued (except to directors and executive officers, whose ability to sell
their shares of common stock is restricted by federal securities and banking laws). Instead, all
shares of common stock sold in the subscription and community offerings will be issued in
book-entry form, through the Direct Registration System (DRS), which allows each investors
shares to be maintained on the books of our transfer agent. Shortly after the conversion is
completed, our transfer agent will issue DRS statements to investors, reflecting their stock
ownership. Statements will be sent by first class mail to the stock registration address noted by
the investor on the stock order form. Though investors will not possess a stock certificate, they
will retain all stockholder rights, including the ability to sell shares. Although the shares of
common stock will have begun trading, brokerage firms are likely to require that you have received
your statement prior to selling your shares. You will be able to purchase additional shares of
Standard Financial Corp. common stock through a brokerage firm.
Other Restrictions. Notwithstanding any other provision of the plan of conversion, no person
is entitled to purchase any shares of common stock to the extent the purchase would be illegal
under any federal or state law or regulation, including state blue sky regulations, or would
violate regulations or policies of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, particularly those
regarding free riding and withholding. We may ask for an acceptable legal opinion from any
purchaser as to the legality of his or her purchase and we may refuse to honor any purchase order
if an opinion is not timely furnished. In addition, we are not required to offer shares of common
stock to any person who resides in a foreign country.
Restrictions on Transfer of Subscription Rights and Shares
Regulations prohibit any person with subscription rights, including the Eligible Account
Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Depositors, from transferring or entering
into any agreement or understanding to transfer the legal or beneficial ownership of the
subscription rights issued under the plan of conversion or the shares of common stock to be issued
upon their exercise. These rights may be exercised only by the person to whom they are granted and
only for his or her account. Each person exercising subscription rights will be required to
certify that he or she is purchasing shares solely for his or her own account and that he or she
has no agreement or understanding regarding the sale or transfer of such shares. The regulations
also prohibit any person from offering or making an announcement of an offer or intent to make an
offer to purchase subscription rights or shares of common stock to be issued upon their exercise
prior to completion of the offering.
We intend to pursue any and all legal and equitable remedies in the event we become aware of
the transfer of subscription rights, and we will not honor orders that we believe involve the
transfer of subscription rights.
Stock Information Center
Our banking office personnel may not, by law, assist with investment related questions. If
you have any questions regarding the offering, please visit call our Stock Information Center, toll
free, at (877) 821-5778, Monday through Friday between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The
Stock Information Center will be closed weekends and bank holidays.
132
Liquidation Rights
Liquidation prior to the conversion. In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of
Standard Bank and Standard Mutual Holding Company prior to the conversion, all claims of creditors
of Standard Bank (including depositors of Standard Bank to the extent of their deposit balances)
would be paid first. Thereafter, any assets of Standard Bank remaining would be distributed to
depositors of Standard Bank based on the relative size of their deposit balances in Standard Bank
immediately prior to the liquidation.
Liquidation following the conversion. In the unlikely event that Standard Bank were to
liquidate after the conversion, all claims of creditors, including depositors of Standard Bank to
the extent of their deposit balances, would be paid first. However, except with respect to the
liquidation accounts to be established in Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank as further
described below, a depositors claim would be solely for the principal amount of his or her deposit
accounts plus accrued interest. Depositors would not have an interest in the value of the assets
of Standard Bank or Standard Financial Corp. above that amount.
The plan of conversion provides for the establishment, upon the completion of the conversion,
of a liquidation account by Standard Financial Corp. for the benefit of Eligible Account Holders
and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders in an amount equal to Standard Mutual Holding Companys
total equity as of the date of the latest statement of financial condition of Standard Mutual
Holding Company prior to the consummation of the conversion. The plan of conversion also provides
for the establishment of a bank liquidation account at Standard Bank to support the Standard
Financial Corp. liquidation account in the event Standard Financial Corp. does not have sufficient
capital resources to fund its obligation under the Standard Financial Corp. liquidation account.
The liquidation account established by Standard Financial Corp. is designed to provide
depositors a liquidation interest (exchanged for the liquidation interest such persons had in
Standard Mutual Holding Company) after the conversion in the event of a liquidation of Standard
Financial Corp. and Standard Bank or a liquidation solely of Standard Bank. Specifically, in the
unlikely event that either (i) Standard Bank or (ii) Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank
were to liquidate after the conversion, all claims of creditors (including depositors of Standard
Bank to the extent of their deposit balances), would be paid first, followed by distribution to
depositors as of March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 of their interests in the liquidation account
maintained by Standard Financial Corp. Also, in a complete liquidation of both entities, or of
Standard Bank alone, when Standard Financial Corp. has insufficient assets (other than the stock of
Standard Bank), to fund the liquidation account distributions due to Eligible Account Holders and
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Standard Bank has positive net worth, Standard Bank shall
immediately make a distribution to fund Standard Financial Corp.s remaining obligations under the
liquidation account. If Standard Financial Corp. is completely liquidated or sold apart from a
sale or liquidation of Standard Bank, then the Standard Financial Corp. liquidation account will
cease to exist and Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders will receive
an equivalent interest in the Standard Bank liquidation account, subject to the same rights and
terms as the liquidation account. In no event will any Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental
Eligible Account Holder be entitled to a distribution that exceeds such holders interest in the
liquidation account maintained by Standard Financial Corp.
Pursuant to the plan of conversion, after two years from the date of conversion and upon the
written request of the Federal Reserve Board and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking, Standard
Financial Corp. will transfer the liquidation account and the depositors interests in such account
to Standard Bank and the liquidation account shall thereupon become the liquidation account of
Standard Bank.
Under applicable rules and regulatory policies, a post-conversion merger, consolidation, or
similar combination or transaction with another depository institution or depository institution
holding
133
company in which Standard Financial Corp. or Standard Bank is not the surviving
institution would not be considered a liquidation. In such a transaction, the liquidation account
would be assumed by the surviving institution or company.
Each Eligible Account Holder or Supplemental Eligible Account Holder would have an initial pro
rata interest in the liquidation account for each deposit account, including savings accounts,
transaction accounts such as negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, money market deposit
accounts, and certificates of deposit, with a balance of $50.00 or more held in Standard Bank on
March 31, 2009 or June 30, 2010 equal to the proportion that the balance of each Eligible Account
Holder and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders deposit account on March 31, 2009 or June 30,
2010 respectively, bears to the balance of all deposit accounts of Eligible Account Holders and
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders in Standard Bank on such dates.
If, however, on any September 30 annual closing date commencing after the effective date of
the conversion, the amount in any such deposit account is less than the amount in the deposit
account on March 31, 2009 or June 30, 2010, or any other annual closing date, then the interest in
the liquidation account relating to such deposit account would be reduced from time to time by the
proportion of any such reduction, and such interest will cease to exist if such deposit account is
closed. In addition, no interest in the liquidation account would ever be increased despite any
subsequent increase in the related deposit account. Payment pursuant to liquidation rights of
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders would be separate and apart from
the payment of any insured deposit accounts to such depositors. Any assets remaining after the
above liquidation rights of Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders are
satisfied would be available for distribution to stockholders.
Material Income Tax Consequences
Completion of the conversion is subject to the prior receipt of an opinion of counsel or tax
advisor with respect to federal and state income tax consequences of the conversion to Standard
Mutual Holding Company, Standard Bank or Standard Financial Corp., Eligible Account Holders and
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders of Standard Financial Corp. Unlike private letter rulings,
the opinions of counsel or tax advisors are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any
state taxing authority, and such authorities may disagree with such opinions. In the event of such
disagreement, there can be no assurance that Standard Financial Corp. or Standard Bank would
prevail in a judicial proceeding.
We have received an opinion of counsel, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. as to the federal
tax consequences of the conversion. We have received an opinion of S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. to the
effect that, more likely than not, the income tax consequences under Pennsylvania law of the
offering are not materially different than for federal income tax purposes.
Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. has issued an opinion to Standard Mutual Holding Company,
Standard Bank and Standard Financial Corp. that for federal income tax purposes:
|
|
Conversion of Standard Mutual Holding Companys Charter |
1. |
|
The conversion of Standard Mutual Holding Companys charter (the MHC Conversion) to a
Pennsylvania-chartered stock corporation (the Standard PA Holding Company) will constitute
a mere change in identity, form or place of organization within the meaning of Section
368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) and therefore
will qualify as a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the
Code.
Neither Standard Mutual Holding Company nor Standard PA Holding Company will recognize any
gain or loss as a result of the MHC Conversion. |
134
2. |
|
The basis and holding period of the assets of Standard Mutual Holding Company to be
received by Standard PA Holding Company will be the same as the basis and holding period of
such assets in Standard Mutual Holding Company immediately prior to the transfer. |
3. |
|
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders will not recognize any
gain or loss upon the constructive exchange of their liquidation interests in Standard Mutual
Holding Company for interests in the liquidation account in Standard PA Holding Company. |
|
|
Merger of Standard PA Holding Company into Standard Financial Corp. |
4. |
|
Immediately after the MHC Conversion, Standard PA Holding Company will merge with and into
Standard Financial Corp., with Standard Financial Corp. as the resulting entity (the
Holding Company Merger). The Holding Company Merger will qualify as a tax-free
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(A) of the Code. |
5. |
|
The constructive exchange of the Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account
Holders liquidation interests in the Standard PA Holding Company for liquidation interests in
Standard Financial Corp. will satisfy the continuity of interest requirement of Section
1.368-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations. |
6. |
|
Neither Standard PA Holding Company nor Standard Financial Corp. will recognize any gain or
loss on the transfer of its assets to Standard Financial Corp. in exchange for an interest in
the liquidation account in Standard Financial Corp. or on the distribution of such interests
to Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. |
7. |
|
The basis and holding period of the assets of Standard PA Holding Company to be received by
Standard Financial Corp. will be the same as the basis and holding period of such assets in
the Standard PA Holding Company immediately prior to the transfer. |
8. |
|
It is more likely than not that the fair market value of the nontransferable subscription
rights to purchase Standard Financial Corp. common stock is zero. Accordingly, it is more
likely than not that no gain or loss will be recognized by Eligible Account Holders,
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Depositors upon distribution to them of
nontransferable subscription rights to purchase shares of Standard Financial Corp. common
stock. Eligible Account Holders, Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Depositors
will not realize any taxable income as a result of their exercise of the nontransferable
subscriptions rights. |
9. |
|
It is more likely than not that the fair market value of the benefit provided by the Standard
Bank liquidation account supporting the payment of the liquidation account in the event
Standard Financial Corp. lacks sufficient net assets is zero. Accordingly, it is more likely
than not that no gain or loss will be recognized by Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental
Eligible Account Holders upon the constructive distribution to them of such rights in the
Standard Bank liquidation account as of the effective date of the Holding Company Merger. |
10. |
|
It is more likely than not that the basis of Standard Financial Corp. common stock
purchased in the offering by the exercise of the nontransferable subscription rights will
be the purchase price thereof. |
11. |
|
No gain or loss will be recognized by Standard Financial Corp. on the receipt of money in
exchange for Standard Financial Corp. common stock sold in the offering. |
135
The opinion under item 8 above is based on the position that the subscription rights to
purchase shares of Standard Financial Corp. common stock received by Eligible Account Holders,
Supplemental Eligible Account Holders and Other Depositors have a fair market value of zero. The
opinion under item 10 above is predicated on the representation that no person shall receive any
payment, whether in money or property, in lieu of the issuance of subscription rights. Luse Gorman
Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. noted that the subscription rights will be granted at no cost to the
recipients, will be legally nontransferable and of short duration, and will provide the recipient
with the right only to purchase shares of Standard Financial Corp. common stock at the same price
to be paid by members of the general public in any Community Offering or Syndicated Community
Offering. Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. also noted that the IRS has not in the past
concluded that subscription rights have value. In addition, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C.
noted that RP Financial has issued a letter stating its belief that subscription rights do not have
any economic value at the time of distribution or at the time the rights are exercised in the
subscription offering. Based on the foregoing, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. believes it is
more likely than not that the nontransferable subscription rights to purchase Standard Financial
Corp. common stock have no value. However, the issue of whether nontransferable subscription
rights have value is based on all the facts and circumstances.
If the subscription rights are subsequently found to have an economic value, income may be
recognized by various recipients of the subscription rights (in certain cases, whether or not
the rights are exercised) and Standard Financial Corp. and/or the Bank may be subject to tax on
the distribution of the subscription rights.
The opinion as to item 9 above is based on the position that the benefit provided by the
Standard Bank liquidation account supporting the payment of the liquidation account in the
event Standard Financial Corp. lacks sufficient net assets has a fair market value of zero. We
understand that: (i) no holder of an interest in a liquidation account has ever received
payment attributable to such interest in a liquidation account; (ii) the interests in the
Standard Financial Corp. liquidation account and Bank liquidation account are not transferable;
(iii) the amounts due under the liquidation account with respect to each Eligible Account
Holder and Supplemental Eligible Account Holder will be reduced as their deposits in the Bank
are reduced as described in the Plan; and (iv) the Standard Bank liquidation account payment
obligation arises only if Standard Financial Corp. lacks sufficient net assets to fund the
liquidation account.
In addition, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. is relying on a letter from RP Financial,
LC. stating its belief that the benefit provided by the Standard Bank liquidation account
supporting the payment of the liquidation account in the event Standard Financial Corp. lacks
sufficient net assets does not have any economic value at the time of the conversion. Based on
the foregoing, Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. believes it is more likely than not that
such rights in the Bank liquidation account have no value.
If such rights in the Standard Bank liquidation account are subsequently found to have an
economic value, income may be recognized by each Eligible Account Holder and Supplemental
Eligible Account Holder in the amount of the fair market value of their interest in the Bank
liquidation account as of the effective date of the conversion.
The opinion of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., unlike a letter ruling issued by the
Internal Revenue Service, is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service and the conclusions
expressed therein may be challenged at a future date. The Internal Revenue Service has issued
favorable rulings for transactions substantially similar to the proposed reorganization and stock
offering, but any such ruling
may not be cited as precedent by any taxpayer other than the taxpayer to whom the ruling is
addressed. We do not plan to apply for a letter ruling concerning the transactions described
herein.
136
The federal tax opinion has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to Standard Financial Corp.s registration statement. Advice regarding the Pennsylvania
state income tax consequences consistent with the federal tax opinion has been issued by S.R.
Snodgrass, A.C., tax advisors to Standard Financial Corp., Standard Mutual Holding Company and
Standard Bank.
Certain Restrictions on Purchase or Transfer of Our Shares after Conversion
The shares being acquired by the directors or executive officers are being acquired for
investment purposes, and not with a view towards resale. All shares of common stock purchased in
the offering by a director or an officer of Standard Bank generally may not be sold for a period of
one year following the closing of the conversion, except in the event of the death of the director
or officer. Each certificate for restricted shares will bear a legend giving notice of this
restriction on transfer, and instructions will be issued to the effect that any transfer within
this time period of any certificate or record ownership of the shares other than as provided above
is a violation of the restriction. Any shares of common stock issued at a later date as a stock
dividend, stock split or otherwise with respect to the restricted stock will be similarly
restricted. The directors and executive officers of Standard Financial Corp. also will be
restricted by the insider trading rules promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Purchases of shares of our common stock by any of our directors or officers or their
associates during the three-year period following the closing of the conversion may be made only
through a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except with
prior written regulatory approval. This restriction does not apply, however, to negotiated
transactions involving more than 1% of our outstanding common stock, to purchases of our common
stock to fund stock options by one or more stock-based benefit plans or to any of our tax-qualified
employee stock benefit plans or nontax-qualified employee stock benefit plans, including any
stock-based benefit plans.
Applicable rules and regulatory policies prohibit Standard Financial Corp. from repurchasing
its shares of common stock during the first year following conversion unless compelling business
reasons exist for such repurchases.
137
STANDARD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
General
In furtherance of our commitment to our local community, the plan of conversion provides that
we will establish a new charitable foundation, Standard Charitable Foundation, as a non-stock,
nonprofit Delaware corporation in connection with the stock offering. The new charitable
foundation will be funded with shares of our common stock and cash, as further described below.
By further enhancing our visibility and reputation in our local community, we believe that the
new charitable foundation will enhance the long-term value of Standard Banks community banking
franchise. The stock offering presents us with a unique opportunity to provide a substantial and
continuing benefit to our communities through the Standard Charitable Foundation.
Purpose of the Charitable Foundation
In connection with the closing of the stock offering, we intend to contribute $200,000 in cash
and a number of shares equal to 3.5% of our shares of common stock sold in the offering to Standard
Charitable Foundation, which, at the adjusted maximum of the offering range, would be a
contribution of 138,900 shares of common stock, and at the minimum of the offering range would be a
contribution of 89,300 shares of common stock. The purpose of the charitable foundation is to
provide financial support to charitable organizations in the communities in which we operate and to
enable our communities to share in our long-term growth. Standard Charitable Foundation will be
dedicated completely to community activities and the promotion of charitable causes, and may be
able to support such activities in ways that are not presently available to us. Standard Charitable
Foundation will also support our ongoing obligations to the community under the Community
Reinvestment Act. Standard Bank received a satisfactory rating in its most recent Community
Reinvestment Act examination.
Funding Standard Charitable Foundation with shares of our common stock is also intended to
allow our communities to share in our potential growth and success after the stock offering is
completed because Standard Charitable Foundation will benefit directly from any increases in the
value of our shares of common stock. In addition, Standard Charitable Foundation will maintain
close ties with Standard Bank, thereby forming a partnership within the communities in which
Standard Bank operates.
Structure of the Charitable Foundation
Standard Charitable Foundation will be incorporated under Delaware law as a non-stock,
nonprofit corporation. The certificate of incorporation of Standard Charitable Foundation will
provide that the corporation is organized exclusively for charitable purposes as set forth in
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Standard Charitable Foundations certificate of
incorporation will further provide that no part of the net earnings of the charitable foundation
will inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to, its members, directors or officers or to
private individuals.
The charitable foundation will be governed by a Board of Directors, initially consisting of
the current Board of Directors of the Company (except for Mr. Zimmerman), and one individual who is
not affiliated with us and who has experience with local charitable organizations and grant making.
We have selected Jennings F. Womack as an outside, independent director. While there are no plans
to change the size of the initial Board of Directors during the year following the completion of
the stock offering, following the first anniversary of the stock offering, the charitable
foundation may alter the size and composition of its Board of Directors. For five years after the
stock offering, one seat on the charitable foundations Board of Directors will be reserved for a
person from our local community who has
138
experience with local community charitable organizations and grant making and who is not one
of our officers, directors or employees, and at least one seat on the charitable foundations Board
of Directors will be reserved for one of Standard Banks directors. Except as described below in
Regulatory Requirements Imposed on the Charitable Foundation, on an annual basis, directors of
the charitable foundation will elect one third of the Board to serve for three-year terms.
The business experience of our current directors and executive officers who will serve as
Board members of the charitable foundation is described in Management of Standard Financial Corp.
Mr. Womack serves as President of the Westmoreland/Frick Hospital Foundation, a subsidiary of
Excela Health, a multi-hospital health system, since 2003. Mr. Womack has served as a trustee of
Excela Health since its inception in 2005. Prior to this position, Mr. Womack served in a variety
of executive level positions at a major retail organization. Mr. Womack has extensive experience
with local charitable and community development organizations.
The Board of Directors of Standard Charitable Foundation will be responsible for establishing
its grant and donation policies, consistent with the purposes for which it was established. As
directors of a nonprofit corporation, directors of Standard Charitable Foundation will at all times
be bound by their fiduciary duty to advance the charitable foundations charitable goals, to
protect its assets and to act in a manner consistent with the charitable purposes for which the
charitable foundation is established. The directors of Standard Charitable Foundation also will be
responsible for directing the activities of the charitable foundation, including the management and
voting of the shares of our common stock held by the charitable foundation. However, all shares of
our common stock held by Standard Charitable Foundation will be voted in the same ratio as all
other shares of our common stock on all proposals considered by our stockholders.
Standard Charitable Foundations initial place of business will be located at our executive
office. The Board of Directors of Standard Charitable Foundation will appoint such officers and
employees as may be necessary to manage its operations. To the extent applicable, we will comply
with the affiliates restrictions set forth in Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and
applicable banking regulations governing transactions between Standard Bank and the charitable
foundation.
Standard Charitable Foundation will receive working capital of approximately $200,000 in cash
from the proceeds of the stock offering. Additional capital for the charitable foundation will
come from:
|
(1) |
|
any dividends that may be paid on our shares of common stock in the future; |
|
|
(2) |
|
within the limits of applicable federal and state laws, loans collateralized by
the shares of common stock; or |
|
|
(3) |
|
the proceeds of the sale of any of the shares of common stock in the open
market from time to time. |
As a private foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, Standard
Charitable Foundation will be required to distribute annually in grants or donations a minimum of
5% of the average fair market value of its net investment assets. One of the conditions imposed on
the gift of shares of common stock is that the amount of shares of common stock that may be sold by
Standard Charitable Foundation in any one year may not exceed 5% of the average market value of the
assets held by Standard Charitable Foundation, except where the Board of Directors of the
charitable foundation determines that the failure to sell an amount of common stock greater than
such amount would result in a
139
long-term reduction of the value of its assets and/or would otherwise jeopardize its capacity
to carry out its charitable purposes.
Tax Considerations
We believe that an organization created for the above purposes should qualify as a Section
501(c)(3) exempt organization under the Internal Revenue Code and should be classified as a private
foundation. Standard Charitable Foundation will submit a timely request to the Internal Revenue
Service to be recognized as an exempt organization. As long as Standard Charitable Foundation
files its application for tax-exempt status within 27 months of the last day of the month in which
it was organized, and provided the Internal Revenue Service approves the application, its effective
date as a Section 501(c)(3) organization will be the date of its organization. We have not
received a tax opinion as to whether Standard Charitable Foundations tax exempt status will be
affected by the regulatory requirement that all shares of our common stock held by Standard
Charitable Foundation must be voted in the same ratio as all other outstanding shares of our common
stock on all proposals considered by our stockholders.
Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank are authorized by state law to make charitable
contributions. We believe that the stock offering presents a unique opportunity to establish and
fund a charitable foundation given the substantial amount of additional capital being raised. In
making such a determination, we considered the dilutive impact to our stockholders of the
contribution of shares of common stock to Standard Charitable Foundation. We believe that the
contribution to Standard Charitable Foundation is justified given Standard Banks capital position
and its earnings, the substantial additional capital being raised in the stock offering and the
potential benefits of Standard Charitable Foundation to our community. See Capitalization,
Historical and Pro Forma Regulatory Capital Compliance, and Comparison of Valuation and Pro
Forma Information With and Without the Charitable Foundation.
We believe that our contribution of shares of our common stock to Standard Charitable
Foundation should not constitute an act of self-dealing and that we should be entitled to a federal
tax deduction in the amount of the fair market value of the stock and cash at the time of the
contribution. We are permitted to deduct for charitable purposes only an amount equal to 10% of
our annual taxable income in any one year. We are permitted under the Internal Revenue Code to
carry the excess contribution over the five-year period following the contribution to Standard
Charitable Foundation. We estimate that if stock is sold up to the maximum of the offering range,
substantially all of the contribution should be deductible for federal tax purposes over the
six-year period (i.e., the year in which the contribution is made and the succeeding five-year
period). However, we do not have any assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will grant
tax-exempt status to the charitable foundation. In such event, our contribution to Standard
Charitable Foundation would be expensed without a tax benefit, resulting in a reduction in earnings
in the year in which the Internal Revenue Service makes such a determination. Furthermore, even if
the contribution is deductible, we may not have sufficient earnings to be able to use the deduction
in full. Any such decision to continue to make additional contributions to Standard Charitable
Foundation in the future would be based on an assessment of, among other factors, our financial
condition at that time, the interests of our stockholders and depositors, and the financial
condition and operations of the charitable foundation.
As a private foundation, earnings and gains, if any, from the sale of common stock or other
assets are exempt from federal and state income taxation. However, investment income, such as
interest, dividends and capital gains, is generally taxed at a rate of 2%. Standard Charitable
Foundation will be required to file an annual return with the Internal Revenue Service within four
and one-half months after
140
the close of its fiscal year. Standard Charitable Foundation will be required to make its
annual return available for public inspection. The annual return for a private foundation
includes, among other things, an itemized list of all grants made or approved, showing the amount
of each grant, the recipient, any relationship between a grant recipient and the foundations
managers and a concise statement of the purpose of each grant.
Regulatory Requirements Imposed on the Charitable Foundation
Similar to the Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, the Federal Reserve Board will
generally not object if a well-capitalized savings bank and its holding company contribute to a
charitable foundation an aggregate amount of 8% or less of the shares or proceeds issued in a stock
offering. Standard Bank qualifies as a well-capitalized savings bank for purposes of this
limitation, and the contribution to the charitable foundation will not exceed this limitation.
The Federal Reserve Board will apply the following conditions on the establishment of the
Standard Bank Foundation, which follow the Office of Thrift Supervision regulations:
|
|
|
the Federal Reserve Board and/or the FDIC may examine the
charitable foundation at the foundations expense; |
|
|
|
|
the charitable foundation must comply with all supervisory directives
imposed by the Federal Reserve Board and/or the FDIC; |
|
|
|
|
the charitable foundation must provide annually to the Federal Reserve
Board a copy of the annual report that the charitable foundation submits to
the Internal Revenue Service; |
|
|
|
|
the charitable foundation must operate according to written policies
adopted by its Board of Directors, including a conflict of interest policy; |
|
|
|
|
the charitable foundation may not engage in self-dealing and must comply
with all laws necessary to maintain its tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue
Code; and |
|
|
|
|
the charitable foundation must vote its shares of our common stock in the
same ratio as all of the other shares voted on each proposal considered by our
stockholders. |
Within six months of completing the stock offering, Standard Charitable Foundation must submit
to the Federal Reserve Board and/or the FDIC a three-year operating plan.
141
RESTRICTIONS ON ACQUISITION OF STANDARD FINANCIAL CORP.
Although the Board of Directors of Standard Financial Corp. is not aware of any effort that
might be made to obtain control of Standard Financial Corp. after the conversion, the Board of
Directors believes that it is appropriate to include certain provisions as part of Standard
Financial Corp.s articles of incorporation to protect the interests of Standard Financial Corp.
and its stockholders from takeovers which our Board of Directors might conclude are not in the best
interests of Standard Bank, Standard Financial Corp. or Standard Financial Corp.s stockholders.
The following discussion is a general summary of the material provisions of the articles of
incorporation and bylaws of Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank and of Maryland corporate
law, Pennsylvania banking law and certain other regulatory provisions that may be deemed to have an
anti-takeover effect. The following description of certain of these provisions is necessarily
general and, with respect to provisions contained in the articles of corporation and bylaws of
Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank, reference should be made in each case to the document
in question, each of which is part of the applications Standard Mutual Holding Company filed with
the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board and, except for Standard
Banks articles of incorporation and bylaws, Standard Financial Corp.s registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See Where You Can Find Additional
Information.
Standard Financial Corp.s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Standard Financial Corp.s articles of incorporation and bylaws contain a number of provisions
relating to corporate governance and rights of stockholders that might discourage future takeover
attempts. As a result, stockholders who might desire to participate in such transactions may not
have an opportunity to do so. In addition, these provisions will also render the removal of the
Board of Directors or management of Standard Financial Corp. more difficult.
Directors. The Board of Directors will be divided into three classes. The members of each
class will be elected for a term of three years and only one class of directors will be elected
annually. Thus, it would take at least two annual elections to replace a majority of our
directors. The bylaws establish qualifications for Board members, including a residency
requirement, an age restriction, restrictions on affiliations with competitors of Standard Bank and
restrictions based upon prior legal or regulatory violations. Further, the bylaws impose notice
and information requirements in connection with the nomination by stockholders of candidates for
election to the Board of Directors or the proposal by stockholders of business to be acted upon at
an annual meeting of stockholders. Such notice and information requirements are applicable to all
stockholder business proposals and nominations, and are in addition to any requirements under the
federal securities laws.
Evaluation of Offers. The articles of incorporation of Standard Financial Corp. provide that
its Board of Directors, when evaluating a transaction that would or may involve a change in control
of Standard Financial Corp. (whether by purchases of its securities, merger, consolidation, share
exchange, dissolution, liquidation, sale of all or substantially all of its assets, proxy
solicitation or otherwise), may, in connection with the exercise of its business judgment in
determining what is in the best interests of Standard Financial Corp. and its stockholders and in
making any recommendation to the stockholders, give due consideration to all relevant factors,
including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
the economic effect, both immediate and long-term, upon Standard Financial Corp.s
stockholders, including stockholders, if any, who do not participate in the
transaction; |
142
|
|
|
the social and economic effect on the present and future employees, creditors and
customers of, and others dealing with, Standard Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries
and on the communities in which Standard Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries operate
or are located; |
|
|
|
|
whether the proposal is acceptable based on the historical, current or projected
future operating results or financial condition of Standard Financial Corp.; |
|
|
|
|
whether a more favorable price could be obtained for Standard Financial Corp.s
stock or other securities in the future; |
|
|
|
|
the reputation and business practices of the other entity to be involved in the
transaction and its management and affiliates as they would affect the employees of
Standard Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
the future value of the stock or any other securities of Standard Financial Corp. or
the other entity to be involved in the proposed transaction; |
|
|
|
|
any antitrust or other legal and regulatory issues that are raised by the proposal; |
|
|
|
|
the business and historical, current or expected future financial condition or
operating results of the other entity to be involved in the transaction, including, but
not limited to, debt service and other existing financial obligations, financial
obligations to be incurred in connection with the proposed transaction, and other
likely financial obligations of the other entity to be involved in the proposed
transaction; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability of Standard Financial Corp. to fulfill its objectives as a financial
institution holding company and on the ability of its subsidiary financial
institution(s) to fulfill the objectives of a federally insured financial institution
under applicable statutes and regulations. |
If the Board of Directors determines that any proposed transaction should be rejected, it may
take any lawful action to defeat such transaction.
Restrictions on Call of Special Meetings. The bylaws provide that special meetings of
stockholders can be called by the President, by a majority of the whole Board of Directors or upon
the written request of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of all votes entitled to
vote at the meeting.
Prohibition of Cumulative Voting. The articles of incorporation prohibit cumulative voting
for the election of directors.
Limitation of Voting Rights. The articles of incorporation provide that in no event will any
person who beneficially owns more than 10% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock, be
entitled or permitted to vote any of the shares of common stock held in excess of the 10% limit;
provided that such 10% limit shall not apply if a majority of the unaffiliated directors approve
the acquisition of shares in excess of the 10% limit prior to such acquisition.
143
Restrictions on Removing Directors from Office. The articles of incorporation provide that
directors may be removed only for cause, and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least 80% of the voting power of all of our then-outstanding capital stock entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors (after giving effect to the limitation on voting rights
discussed above in Limitation of Voting Rights), voting together as a single class.
Authorized but Unissued Shares. After the conversion, Standard Financial Corp. will have
authorized but unissued shares of common and preferred stock. See Description of Capital Stock.
The articles of incorporation authorize 10,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock. Standard
Financial Corp. is authorized to issue preferred stock from time to time in one or more series
subject to applicable provisions of law, and the Board of Directors is authorized to fix the
preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends,
qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of such shares. In addition, the articles of
incorporation provide that a majority of the whole Board may, without action by the stockholders,
amend the articles of incorporation to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock
of any class or series that Standard Financial Corp. has the authority to issue. In the event of a
proposed merger, tender offer or other attempt to gain control of Standard Financial Corp. that the
Board of Directors does not approve, it would be possible for the Board of Directors to authorize
the issuance of a series of preferred stock with rights and preferences that would impede the
completion of the transaction. An effect of the possible issuance of preferred stock therefore may
be to deter a future attempt to gain control of Standard Financial Corp. The Board of Directors
has no present plan or understanding to issue any preferred stock.
Amendments to Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Except as provided under Authorized
but Unissued Shares, above, regarding the amendment of the articles of incorporation by the Board
of Directors to increase or decrease the number of shares authorized for issuance, or as otherwise
allowed by law, any amendment to the articles of incorporation must be approved by our Board of
Directors and also by a majority of the outstanding shares of our voting stock; provided, however,
that approval by at least 80% of the outstanding voting stock is generally required to amend the
following provisions:
|
(i) |
|
The limitation on voting rights of persons who directly or indirectly
beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of common stock; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
The division of the Board of Directors into three staggered classes; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
The ability of the Board of Directors to fill vacancies on the Board; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
The requirement that at least 80% of the votes eligible to be cast by
stockholders must vote to remove directors, and that stockholders can only remove
directors for cause; |
|
|
(v) |
|
The ability of the Board of Directors to amend and repeal the bylaws; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
The ability of the Board of Directors to evaluate a variety of factors in
evaluating offers to purchase or otherwise acquire Standard Financial Corp.; |
|
|
(vii) |
|
The authority of the Board of Directors to provide for the issuance of
preferred stock; |
|
|
(viii) |
|
The validity and effectiveness of any action lawfully authorized by the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common
stock; |
144
|
(ix) |
|
The number of stockholders constituting a quorum or required for stockholder
consent; |
|
|
(x) |
|
The indemnification of current and former directors and officers, as well as
employees and other agents, by Standard Financial Corp.; |
|
|
(xi) |
|
The limitation of liability of officers and directors to Standard Financial
Corp. for money damages; |
|
|
(xii) |
|
The inability of stockholders to cumulate their votes in the election of directors; |
|
|
(xiii) |
|
The advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations; and |
|
|
(xiv) |
|
The provision of the articles of incorporation requiring approval of at least
80% of the outstanding voting stock to amend the provisions of the articles of
incorporation provided in (i) through (xiii) of this list. |
The articles of incorporation also provide that the bylaws may be amended by the affirmative
vote of a majority of our directors or by the stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least 80%
of the total votes eligible to be voted at a duly constituted meeting of stockholders. Any
amendment of this supermajority requirement for amendment of the bylaws would also require the
approval of 80% of the outstanding voting stock.
Business Combinations with Interested Stockholders. Under Maryland law, as may be made
applicable by the Board of Directors of Standard Financial Corp. at any time pursuant to its
bylaws, business combinations between Standard Financial Corp. and an interested stockholder or
an affiliate of an interested stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent date
on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. These business combinations
include a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or, in circumstances specified in the
statute, certain transfers of assets, certain stock issuances and transfers, liquidation plans and
reclassifications involving interested stockholders and their affiliates or issuance or
reclassification of equity securities. Maryland law defines an interested stockholder as: (i) any
person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of Standard Financial Corp. voting
stock after the date on which Standard Financial Corp. had 100 or more beneficial owners of its
stock; or (ii) an affiliate or associate of Standard Financial Corp. at any time after the date on
which Standard Financial Corp. had 100 or more beneficial owners of its stock who, within the
two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the
voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock of Standard Financial Corp. A person is not an
interested stockholder under the statute if the Board of Directors approved in advance the
transaction by which the person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However, in
approving a transaction, the Board of Directors may provide that its approval is subject to
compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the Board
of Directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between Standard Financial Corp. and
an interested stockholder generally must be recommended by the Board of Directors of Standard
Financial Corp. and approved by the affirmative vote of at least: (i) 80% of the votes entitled to
be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock of Standard Financial Corp., and (ii)
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of Standard Financial Corp.
other than shares held by the interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the business
combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder.
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if Standard Financial Corp.s common
stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under
145
Maryland law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as
previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.
Standard Banks Articles of Incorporation
In connection with the conversion and offering, the articles of incorporation of Standard Bank
will be amended to provide that for a period of five years from the closing of the conversion and
offering, no person other than Standard Financial Corp. may offer directly or indirectly to acquire
the beneficial ownership of more than 10% of any class of equity security of Standard Bank. This
provision does not apply to any tax-qualified employee benefit plan of Standard Bank or Standard
Financial Corp., or to an underwriter or member of an underwriting or selling group involving the
public sale or resale of securities of Standard Financial Corp. or any of its subsidiaries, so long
as after the sale or resale, no underwriter or member of the selling group is a beneficial owner,
directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of any class of equity securities of Standard Bank.
Change in Control Regulations
Federal law requires the approval of the Federal Reserve Board prior to any person or entity,
or any persons or entities acting in concert, acquiring 10% or more of the common stock of Standard
Financial Corp., and prior to certain other actions that are deemed pursuant to regulations of the
Federal Reserve Board to constitute control. In addition, Pennsylvania law requires the approval
of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking prior to acquiring control of a Pennsylvania savings
bank.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
Under its articles of incorporation, Standard Financial Corp. is authorized to issue
40,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, par value $0.01 per share. Standard Financial Corp. currently expects to issue in the
offering up to 3,967,500 shares of common stock. Standard Financial Corp. will not issue shares of
preferred stock in the offering. Each share of Standard Financial Corp. common stock will have the
same relative rights as, and will be identical in all respects to, each other share of common
stock. Upon payment of the subscription price for the common stock, in accordance with the plan of
conversion, all of the shares of common stock will be duly authorized, fully paid and
nonassessable.
The shares of common stock of Standard Financial Corp. will represent nonwithdrawable capital,
will not be an account of an insurable type, and will not be insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
Common Stock
Dividends. Standard Financial Corp. may pay dividends up to an amount equal to the excess of
our capital surplus over payments that would be owed upon dissolution to stockholders whose
preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the dividend, and to an amount
that would not make us insolvent, as and when declared by our Board of Directors. Standard
Financial Corp. is also prohibited from paying dividends that would reduce Standard Financial
Corp.s capital below the then adjusted balance of its liquidation account. The holders of common
stock of Standard Financial Corp. will be entitled to receive and share equally in dividends as may
be declared by our Board of Directors
146
out of funds legally available therefor. If Standard Financial Corp. issues shares of
preferred stock, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common stock with
respect to dividends.
Voting Rights. Upon consummation of the conversion, the holders of common stock of Standard
Financial Corp. will have exclusive voting rights in Standard Financial Corp. They will elect
Standard Financial Corp.s Board of Directors and act on other matters as are required to be
presented to them under Maryland law or as are otherwise presented to them by the Board of
Directors. Generally, each holder of common stock will be entitled to one vote per share and will
not have any right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. Any person who beneficially
owns more than 10% of the then-outstanding shares of Standard Financial Corp.s common stock,
however, will not be entitled or permitted to vote any shares of common stock held in excess of the
10% limit. If Standard Financial Corp. issues shares of preferred stock, holders of the preferred
stock may also possess voting rights. Certain matters require an 80% stockholder vote.
As a Pennsylvania-chartered stock savings bank, corporate powers and control of Standard Bank
are vested in its Board of Directors, who elect the officers of Standard Bank and who fill any
vacancies on the Board of Directors. Voting rights of Standard Bank are vested exclusively in the
owners of the shares of capital stock of Standard Bank, which will be Standard Financial Corp.
Shares of Standard Bank stock held by Standard Financial Corp. will be voted at the direction of
Standard Financial Corp.s Board of Directors. Consequently, the holders of the common stock of
Standard Financial Corp. will not have direct control of Standard Bank.
Liquidation. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Standard Bank,
Standard Financial Corp., as the holder of 100% of Standard Banks capital stock, would be entitled
to receive all assets of Standard Bank available for distribution, after payment or provision for
payment of all debts and liabilities of Standard Bank, including all deposit accounts and accrued
interest thereon, and after any required distribution from Standard Banks liquidation account to
Eligible Account Holders and Supplemental Eligible Account Holders. In the event of liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of Standard Financial Corp., the holders of Standard Financial Corp.s
common stock would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all its debts
and liabilities, all of the assets of Standard Financial Corp. available for distribution. If
preferred stock is issued, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common
stock in the event of liquidation or dissolution.
Preemptive Rights. Holders of the common stock of Standard Financial Corp. will not be
entitled to preemptive rights with respect to any shares that may be issued, unless such preemptive
rights are approved by the Board of Directors. The common stock is not subject to redemption.
Preferred Stock
None of the shares of Standard Financial Corp.s authorized preferred stock will be issued as
part of the offering or the conversion. Preferred stock may be issued with preferences and
designations as our Board of Directors may from time to time determine. Our Board of Directors
may, without stockholder approval, issue shares of preferred stock with voting, dividend,
liquidation and conversion rights that could dilute the voting strength of the holders of the
common stock and may assist management in impeding an unfriendly takeover or attempted change in
control.
TRANSFER AGENT
The transfer agent and registrar for Standard Financial Corp.s common stock is Registrar and
Transfer Company, Cranford, New Jersey.
147
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Standard Mutual Holding Company and subsidiary as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30,
2009 included in this Prospectus and in the registration statement have been so included in
reliance upon the report of S.R. Snodgrass, A.C., an independent registered public accounting firm,
appearing elsewhere herein and in the registration statement, given on the authority of said firm
as experts in auditing and accounting.
RP Financial, LC. has consented to the publication herein of the summary of its report to
Standard Financial Corp. setting forth its opinion as to the estimated pro forma market value of
the shares of common stock upon completion of the conversion and offering and its letter with
respect to subscription rights.
LEGAL MATTERS
Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C., Washington, D.C., counsel to Standard Financial Corp. and
Standard Bank, has issued to Standard Financial Corp. its opinions regarding the legality of the
common stock and the federal income tax consequences of the conversion and its opinion regarding
the contribution to the charitable foundation. Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C. has consented
to the references in this prospectus to its opinions. S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. has issued to Standard
Mutual Holding Company, Standard Financial Corp. and Standard Bank its opinion regarding the state
income tax consequences of the conversion. S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. has consented to the reference in
this prospectus to its opinion. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company by Elias, Matz, Tiernan & Herrick, L.L.P., Washington, D.C.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Standard Financial Corp. has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to the shares of common stock offered
hereby. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
prospectus does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement. Such
information, including the appraisal report which is an exhibit to the registration statement, can
be examined without charge at the public reference facilities of the Securities and Exchange
Commission located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, and copies of such material can
be obtained from the Securities and Exchange Commission at prescribed rates. The Securities and
Exchange Commission telephone number is 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the Securities and Exchange
Commission maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information
statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including Standard Financial Corp. The statements contained in this
prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement are, of necessity, brief descriptions of the material terms of, and should
be read in conjunction with, such contract or document.
Standard Mutual Holding Company has filed with the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the
Federal Reserve Board Applications with respect to the conversion. This prospectus omits certain
information contained in the Applications. The Applications may be examined at the offices of the
Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, respectively. Our
plan of conversion is available, upon request, at each of our branch offices.
148
In connection with the offering, Standard Financial Corp. will register its common stock under
Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, upon such registration, Standard
Financial Corp. and the holders of its common stock will become subject to the proxy solicitation
rules, reporting requirements and restrictions on common stock purchases and sales by directors,
officers and greater than 10% stockholders, the annual and periodic reporting and certain other
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the plan of conversion, Standard
Financial Corp. has undertaken that it will not terminate such registration for a period of at
least three years following the offering.
149
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
Number |
|
|
F-1 |
|
|
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 F-31 |
150
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Standard Mutual Holding Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Standard Mutual
Holding Company and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of
income, net worth, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Standard Mutual Holding Company and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements, effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted
FASB ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures.
/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
Wexford, PA
December 14, 2009, except to Note 15,
for which it is dated June 8, 2010
F-1
Standard Mutual Holding Company
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Periods Ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on hand and due from banks |
|
$ |
2,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,121 |
|
Interest-earning deposits in other institutions |
|
|
22,554 |
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
25,130 |
|
|
|
12,420 |
|
|
|
18,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
48,652 |
|
|
|
42,550 |
|
|
|
18,711 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
21,371 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
10,238 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity, fair value of $19,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,518 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $3,451 and $3,078 and $2,426 |
|
|
277,148 |
|
|
|
270,769 |
|
|
|
257,551 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Office properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
3,816 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
|
9,080 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8,769 |
|
|
|
8,769 |
|
|
|
8,769 |
|
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and other assets |
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
403,209 |
|
|
$ |
382,415 |
|
|
$ |
353,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND NET WORTH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand, regular, and club accounts |
|
$ |
192,299 |
|
|
$ |
178,758 |
|
|
$ |
149,550 |
|
Certificate accounts |
|
|
118,897 |
|
|
|
108,176 |
|
|
|
105,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
|
311,196 |
|
|
|
286,934 |
|
|
|
254,632 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
42,078 |
|
|
|
46,618 |
|
|
|
50,948 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
3,537 |
|
Advance deposits by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Securities purchased not settled |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Accrued interest and other expenses |
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
|
359,648 |
|
|
|
340,247 |
|
|
|
315,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Worth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings, substantially restricted |
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
41,136 |
|
|
|
38,992 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NET WORTH |
|
|
43,561 |
|
|
|
42,168 |
|
|
|
38,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET WORTH |
|
$ |
403,209 |
|
|
$ |
382,415 |
|
|
$ |
353,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Standard Mutual Holding Company
Consolidated Statements of Income
Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,007 |
|
|
$ |
15,837 |
|
|
$ |
16,220 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Interest-earning deposits |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income |
|
|
9,160 |
|
|
|
9,197 |
|
|
|
18,236 |
|
|
|
18,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
3,006 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
|
|
7,055 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
|
8,091 |
|
|
|
9,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
5,787 |
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
10,145 |
|
|
|
9,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses |
|
|
5,358 |
|
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
|
9,045 |
|
|
|
9,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Net securities gains (losses) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(1,586 |
) |
Annuity and mutual fund fees |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Other income |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noninterest Income |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits |
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
4,819 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Premises and occupancy costs |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Core deposit amortization |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
ATM expense |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noninterest Expenses |
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
4,471 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
8,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Tax Expense |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
786 |
|
State |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Standard Mutual Holding Company
Consolidated Statements of Net Worth
Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Worth |
|
Balance, September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
37,852 |
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
$ |
39,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized loss on
securities available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
38,992 |
|
|
$ |
(297 |
) |
|
$ |
38,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized gain on
securities available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
41,136 |
|
|
$ |
1,032 |
|
|
$ |
42,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized loss on
securities available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
$ |
42,675 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
43,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Standard Mutual Holding Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and Years Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Net amortization of premium/discount on securities |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Net (gain) loss on securities |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
173 |
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest and other assets |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
Increase in prepaid FDIC insurance |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in other accrued expenses |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued income taxes payable |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(7,060 |
) |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(15,367 |
) |
|
|
(14,453 |
) |
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(22,111 |
) |
|
|
(21,325 |
) |
|
|
(35,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,744 |
) |
|
|
(4,744 |
) |
|
|
(5,753 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities/principal repayments/calls of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
15,712 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
8,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
8,117 |
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Net disposals (purchases) of office properties and equipment |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(6,819 |
) |
|
|
(21,300 |
) |
|
|
(38,086 |
) |
|
|
(10,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in demand, regular and club accounts |
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
20,741 |
|
|
|
29,208 |
|
|
|
9,699 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in certificate accounts |
|
|
10,721 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
3,094 |
|
|
|
(19,044 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(9,530 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(8,780 |
) |
|
|
(5,594 |
) |
Proceeds from new Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
23,733 |
|
(Decrease) increase in advance deposits by borrowers
for taxes and insurance |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
18,145 |
|
|
|
20,866 |
|
|
|
28,810 |
|
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
12,710 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
(6,397 |
) |
|
|
674 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents Beginning |
|
|
12,420 |
|
|
|
18,817 |
|
|
|
18,817 |
|
|
|
18,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents Ending |
|
$ |
25,130 |
|
|
$ |
19,846 |
|
|
$ |
12,420 |
|
|
$ |
18,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Cash Flows Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
3,419 |
|
|
$ |
4,267 |
|
|
$ |
8,256 |
|
|
$ |
9,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate acquired in settlement of loans |
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased not settled |
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following comprise the significant accounting policies which Standard Mutual Holding Company
and subsidiaries (the Company) follow in preparing and presenting their consolidated financial
statements:
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Standard Mutual
Holding Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, Standard Bank, PaSB (the
Bank), and Westmoreland Investment Company. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Nature of Operations
The Companys primary asset is the stock of its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank, a
Pennsylvania-chartered state savings bank with deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC). The Bank is a retail-oriented financial institution, which offers
traditional deposit and loan products through its ten full-service offices in Allegheny,
Westmoreland, and Bedford Counties of Pennsylvania and Northern Allegany County of Maryland.
Westmoreland Investment Company is a Delaware subsidiary, holding residential mortgage loans as
the majority of its assets.
Financial Statements
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a September 30
fiscal-year basis. For regulatory and income tax reporting purposes, the Company reports on a
December 31 calendar-year basis.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and
expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material
estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the
determination of the allowance for loan losses, valuation of deferred taxes, and the valuation of
intangible assets.
Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk
Most of the Banks activities are with customers located within Allegheny, Westmoreland, and
Bedford Counties of Pennsylvania and Northern Allegany County of Maryland. Notes 2 and 3 discuss
the types of securities in which the Company invests. Note 4 discusses the types of lending in
which the Company engages. The Company does not have any significant concentrations in any one
industry or customer.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and due from
banks and interest-earning deposits in other institutions.
F-6
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Interest-Earning Deposits In Other Institutions
Interest-earning deposits in other institutions mature within three months and are carried at
cost.
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities
The Company accounts for investment and mortgage-backed securities by classifying them into three
categories: (1) securities held to maturity; (2) securities available for sale; and (3) trading
securities.
Securities held to maturity are carried at cost adjusted for amortization of premium and
accretion of discount over the term of the related investments using the interest method.
Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income (loss) as a part of net worth.
Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms
of the securities.
Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost
that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In
estimating the other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of
time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
of the underlying issuer, (3) ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations, (4) the
intent to sell the security or whether its more likely than not that the Company would be
required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery in market value. Realized gains
and losses determined on the basis of the cost of the specific securities sold are reported in
earnings.
Securities bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are
classified as trading and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included
in earnings.
Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank System to hold stock of
its district Federal Home Loan Bank according to a predetermined formula. The restricted stock
is carried at cost and classified separately on the statement of financial condition.
Loans Receivable
Loans are stated at their unpaid principal balances net of deferred origination fees less
allowances for losses. Monthly payments are scheduled to include interest. Interest on loans is
credited to income as earned. Interest earned on loans for which no payments were received
during the month is accrued. An allowance is established for accrued interest deemed to be
uncollectible, generally when a loan is 90 days or more delinquent. Such interest ultimately
collected is credited to income in the period received. Amortization of premiums and accretion
of discounts are recognized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to the loans yield using
the interest method and cease when a loan becomes nonperforming. Loan origination fees, net of
certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized over the contractual life of the
related loan as a yield adjustment.
F-7
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged against
income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and
subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses
that can be reasonably anticipated. Managements periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the
allowance is based on the Companys past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the
portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, the estimated
value of the underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic
conditions, and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective, since it
required estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes
available.
The allowance consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component
relates to loans that are classified as either doubtful, substandard, or special mention. The
general component covers nonclassified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted
for qualitative factors.
A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is
probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due for principal and interest
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in
determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting
scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment
delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines
the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into
consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the
length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record, and the
amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial loans by either the present value
of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or, as a practical
expedient, its observable market price or, if the loan is collateral-dependent, the fair value of
the underlying collateral. Large groups of smaller-balance homogenous loans are collectively
evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual
residential real estate and consumer loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the
subject of a restructuring agreement.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale and Mortgage Loan Servicing
Mortgage loans held for sale are valued at the lower of cost or fair value as determined by
current investor yield requirements calculated on an aggregate basis. The Company had no loans
held for sale at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The Company acquired mortgage servicing rights through the origination and sale of mortgage
loans. These rights are recognized as separate assets by allocating the total costs of the
mortgage loans to the mortgage servicing rights and the loans (without the mortgage servicing
rights) based on their relative fair values when the respective loans are sold.
F-8
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale and Mortgage Loan Servicing (Continued)
The Company measures the impairment of the mortgage servicing rights based on their current fair
value. Current fair value is determined through the discounted present value of the estimated
future net servicing cash flows using a risk-based discount rate and assumptions based upon
market estimates for future servicing revenues and expenses (including prepayment expectations,
servicing costs, default rates and interest earnings on escrows). For impairment measurement
purposes, servicing rights are stratified by interest rates. If the carrying value of an
individual stratum exceeds its fair value, a valuation allowance is established.
Foreclosed Real Estate
Foreclosed real estate consists of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or
acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Foreclosed real estate is initially recorded at
fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at the date of foreclosure establishing a new cost
basis. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are
carried at the lower of cost or fair value minus estimated costs to sell. Revenues and expenses
from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in earnings.
Office Properties and Equipment
Office properties and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the related assets. Estimated lives are 40 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years
for furniture and equipment. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed on the
straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life or term of the related lease.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Company owns insurance on the lives of certain key employees. The policies were purchased to
help offset the cost of increases in various fringe benefit plans, including healthcare. The
cash surrender value of these policies is shown on the Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition, and any increases in the cash surrender value are recorded as noninterest income on
the Consolidated Statements of Income. In the event of the death of an insured individual under
these policies, the Company would receive a death benefit which would be recorded as other
income.
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the cost of net assets purchased.
Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment.
At least annually, management reviews goodwill and evaluates events or changes in circumstances
that may indicate impairment in the carrying amount of goodwill. If the sum of the expected
undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the net assets, an impairment
loss will be recognized. Impairment, if any, is measured on a discounted future cash flow basis.
For March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008, no impairment existed; however, for
any future period the Company determines that there has been impairment in the carrying value of
goodwill, the Company would record a charge to earnings, which could have a material adverse
effect on net income.
F-9
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible (Continued)
The Company has core deposit intangible assets relating to the acquisition of HNB in 2006 and a
one-branch office acquisition in 2002. These intangible assets are being amortized on a
straight-line basis over a period of ten years and also continue to be subject to impairment
testing. The remaining balance of the core deposit intangible from the 2002 branch acquisition
was fully amortized in 2008. The balance of core deposit intangibles at March 31, 2010
(unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $939,000, $1,023,000 and $1,191,000, respectively,
net of accumulated amortization of $1,062,000 at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), $978,000 at
September 30, 2009 and $810,000 at September 30, 2008. Amortization expense of $84,000, $84,000,
$168,000 and $174,000 was recorded for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
and years ended September 30 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated to
be $168,000 in 2010 through 2014, and $183,000 thereafter.
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets are recognized
for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable
temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for
the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instrument
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into off-balance sheet financial
instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. Such financial
instruments are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition when they are
funded.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains
and losses be included in net income. However, certain changes in assets and liabilities, such
as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate
component of net worth in the Statements of Financial Condition. Such items, along with net
income, are components of comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income
(loss) and related tax effects for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and
the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on
available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
(213 |
) |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
(4,448 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses
realized in income |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized (Losses) Gains |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
(2,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Tax Amount |
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Advertising Costs
The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred.
Advertising costs for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, totaled $36,000, $48,000, $88,000 and $91,000, respectively.
Reclassifications
Certain comparative amounts for the prior year have been reclassified to conform to current-year
classifications. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or net worth.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Accounting for Transfer of Financial Assets. ASU
2009-16 provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and
comparability of the information that an entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. ASU 2009-16 is effective for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact the adoption of this standard will have on the Companys financial position or results of
operation.
In December 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises
Involved with Variable Interest Entities. The objective of ASU 2009-17 is to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant
and reliable information to users of financial statements. ASU 2009-17 is effective for annual
periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or
results of operation.
In September 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting Topic 820. This creates a practical
expedient to measure the fair value of an alternative investment that does not have a readily
determinable fair value. This guidance also requires certain additional disclosures. This
guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption
of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operation.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in
Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20
to expand accounting and reporting guidance for own-share lending arrangements issued in
contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning
on or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements
outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions to
Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task
Force. ASU 2010-01 clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows
them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash
that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that
is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for
interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied on a
retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position or results of operation.
F-11
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and reporting
for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary a Scope Clarification. ASU 2010-02 amends Subtopic
810-10 to address implementation issues related to changes in ownership provisions including
clarifying the scope of the
decrease in ownership and additional disclosures. ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the
period that an entity adopts Statement 160. If an entity has previously adopted Statement 160,
ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or
after December 15, 2009 and should be applied retrospectively to the first period Statement 160
was adopted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics Technical
Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance
including the following topics: accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest
rate swap, issuance of financial statements subsequent events, use of residential method to
value acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding
gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation.
ASU 2010-04 is effective January 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-05, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718):
Escrowed Share Arrangements and the Presumption of Compensation. ASU 2010-05 updates existing
guidance to address the SEC staffs views on overcoming the presumption that for certain
shareholders escrowed share arrangements represent compensation. ASU 2010-05 is effective
January 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to
clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to
guidance on employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU
2010-08 clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operation.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging. ASU 2010-11 provides
clarification and related additional examples to improve financial reporting by resolving
potential ambiguity about the breadth of the embedded credit derivative scope exception in ASC
815-15-15-8. ASU 2010-11 is effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning
after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant impact
on the Companys financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718):
Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the
Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. ASU 2010-13 provides guidance on the
classification of a share-based payment award as either equity or a liability. A share-based
payment that contains a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition is
required to be classified as a liability. ASU 2010-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010 and is not expected to
have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
F-12
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 2 Investment Securities
Investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and
2008 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency obligations due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
$ |
19,343 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
19,310 |
|
Beyond 5 years but within 10 years |
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2,611 |
|
Beyond 10 years |
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
Corporate bonds due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
Municipal obligations due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,288 |
|
Beyond 5 years but within 10 years |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
Beyond 10 years |
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRA Investment Fund |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
744 |
|
Freddie Mac common stock |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Common stocks |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
48,071 |
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
48,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 2 Investment Securities (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency obligations due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
$ |
10,250 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,322 |
|
Beyond 5 years but within 10 years |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 |
|
Beyond 10 years |
|
|
7,030 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
Corporate bonds due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Municipal obligations due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,736 |
|
Beyond 5 years but within 10 years |
|
|
2,904 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
3,060 |
|
Beyond 10 years |
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
7,302 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRA Investment Fund |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
748 |
|
Freddie Mac common stock |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Common stocks |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
41,779 |
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
|
$ |
(219 |
) |
|
$ |
42,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency obligations due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year |
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
996 |
|
Corporate bonds due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
600 |
|
Municipal obligations due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond 1 year but within 5 years |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
971 |
|
Beyond 5 years but within 10 years |
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Beyond 10 years |
|
|
7,883 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
7,883 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRA Investment Fund |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
721 |
|
Freddie Mac common stock |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
Common stocks |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
19,055 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
$ |
18,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on investment securities was $392,000, $363,000, and $155,000 at
March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
F-14
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 2 Investment Securities (Continued)
During the six months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited), gains and losses on sales of investment
securities netted to $0 and proceeds from such sales were $1,265,000. During the year ended
September 30, 2009, losses on sales of investment securities totaled $456,000 and proceeds from
such sales were $543,000. In addition, impairment losses totaling $141,000 were recorded for the
six months March 31, 2009 (unaudited) and year ended September 30, 2009 for other-than-temporary
declines in market value on investment securities relating to financial industry common stocks.
During the year ended September 30, 2008, impairment charges totaling $1,604,000 were recorded
related to $1,500,000 of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and Federal
National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) preferred stocks and $104,000 of financial industry
related common stocks. At March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009, and 2008, no
securities were held in the trading portfolio.
The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses on investment securities and
the length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
U.S. government and
agency obligations |
|
$ |
15,152 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,152 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Temporarily Impaired Securities |
|
$ |
15,152 |
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
(104 |
) |
|
$ |
15,878 |
|
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Municipal obligations |
|
$ |
829 |
|
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
(87 |
) |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Temporarily Impaired Securities |
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
2,006 |
|
|
$ |
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 2 Investment Securities (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
U.S. government and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agency obligations |
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
Municipal obligations |
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Temporarily Impaired Securities |
|
$ |
4,094 |
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
$ |
(522 |
) |
|
$ |
5,486 |
|
|
$ |
(701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company held 17, 13 and
18, respectively, securities in an unrealized loss position. The decline in the fair value of
these securities resulted primarily from interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not intend
to sell these securities nor is it more likely than not that the Company would be required to
sell these securities before its anticipated recovery and the Company believes the collection of
the investment and related interest is probable. Based on this, the Company considers all of the
unrealized losses to be temporary impairment losses.
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale of March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009,
and 2008, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government pass-throughs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
National Mortgage Association |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,121 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
9,639 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
Fannie Mae |
|
|
8,979 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,287 |
|
Private pass-throughs |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,610 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
21,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government pass-throughs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
National Mortgage Association |
|
$ |
1,518 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,554 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
12,466 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
Fannie Mae |
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,149 |
|
Private pass-throughs |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,902 |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
26,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government pass-throughs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
National Mortgage Association |
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
1,839 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
5,835 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
5,759 |
|
Fannie Mae |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Private pass-throughs |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,343 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
(131 |
) |
|
$ |
10,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government pass-throughs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
10,157 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
10,076 |
|
Fannie Mae |
|
|
9,361 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
9,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,518 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
(196 |
) |
|
$ |
19,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on mortgage-backed securities was $77,000, $99,000, and $113,000 at
March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During the six months ended March 31, 2010 (unaudited), gains on sales of mortgage-backed
securities available for sale totaled $8,000 and proceeds from such sales were $848,000. During
2009, all mortgage-backed securities previously categorized as held to maturity were transferred
to available for sale. There were no sales of mortgage-backed securities during 2009. During
2008, gains on sales of mortgage-backed securities available for sale totaled $18,000 and
proceeds from such sales were $2,432,000.
F-17
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued)
The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed
securities and the length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private pass-throughs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available for Sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private pass-throughs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available for Sale |
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
947 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than Twelve Months |
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association |
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
Freddie Mac |
|
|
4,480 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
5,617 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
Fannie Mae |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Private pass-throughs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available for Sale |
|
$ |
6,892 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
1,291 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
8,183 |
|
|
$ |
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac |
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
4,213 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
7,063 |
|
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
Fannie Mae |
|
|
6,019 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
7,936 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Held to Maturity |
|
$ |
8,869 |
|
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
6,130 |
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
$ |
14,999 |
|
|
$ |
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 3 Mortgage-Backed Securities (continued)
At March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company held 2, 2 and 40,
respectively, mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position. The decline in the fair
value of these securities resulted primarily from interest rate fluctuations. The Company does
not intend to sell these securities nor is it more likely than not that the Company would be
required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery and the Company believes the
collection of the investment and related interest is probable. Based on this, the Company
considers all of the unrealized losses to be temporary impairment losses.
Mortgage-backed securities with a carrying value of $11,618,000, $15,207,000 and $13,974,000 were
pledged to secure repurchase agreements and public funds accounts at March 31, 2010 (unaudited),
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note 4 Loans Receivable
Loans receivable at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four-family dwellings |
|
$ |
139,018 |
|
|
$ |
134,958 |
|
|
$ |
129,973 |
|
Construction |
|
|
3,133 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
5,028 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
80,921 |
|
|
|
76,890 |
|
|
|
67,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,072 |
|
|
|
213,993 |
|
|
|
202,412 |
|
Loans in process |
|
|
(2,211 |
) |
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
Deferred loan fees, net |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,804 |
|
|
|
212,686 |
|
|
|
200,150 |
|
Loans secured by savings accounts |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
Second mortgage loans |
|
|
38,657 |
|
|
|
40,598 |
|
|
|
39,864 |
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
1,542 |
|
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
4,888 |
|
|
|
4,215 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
13,137 |
|
|
|
12,414 |
|
|
|
12,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Receivable Before Allowance for Loan Losses |
|
|
280,599 |
|
|
|
273,847 |
|
|
|
259,977 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(3,451 |
) |
|
|
(3,078 |
) |
|
|
(2,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
277,148 |
|
|
$ |
270,769 |
|
|
$ |
257,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys primary business activity is with customers located within its local trade area.
Commercial, residential, and personal loans are granted. Although the Company has a diversified
loan portfolio at March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008, loans outstanding to
individual and businesses are dependent upon the local economic conditions in its immediate
trade area.
Accrued interest receivable on loans was $1,000,000, $956,000, and $970,000 at March 31, 2010
(unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
F-19
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 4 Loans Receivable (continued)
Activity with respect to the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
3,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no loans in arrears three months or more still accruing interest. Loans in arrears
three months or more or in process of foreclosure (nonaccrual loans) were as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
Amount |
|
Receivable |
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
% |
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Total interest income which would have been recognized had these loans paid in accordance with
their contractual terms and actual interest income recognized on these loans as for the six
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are
summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income that would have been recognized |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
Interest income recognized |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income forgone |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans serviced for others were $17,655,000, $19,551,000, and $21,656,000 at March 31, 2010
(unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These loans serviced for others are not
assets of the Company and are appropriately excluded from the Companys financial statements.
Mortgage servicing rights were $31,000, $33,000, and $20,000 at March 31, 2010 (unaudited),
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and are included on the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition in other assets. Mortgage servicing rights are recorded by allocating the
total cost of acquired mortgage loans to the mortgage servicing rights and the loans (without the
mortgage servicing rights) based on their relative fair values. Mortgage servicing rights are
deferred and amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net service fee income.
The estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights was $91,000, $98,000, and $182,000 at March
31, 2010 (unaudited), September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, based on the present value of
expected, future cash flows using a market discount rate. The Company periodically evaluates its
mortgage servicing rights for impairment based on the fair value of those rights. Impairment, if
any, would be recognized through a valuation allowance for each loan portfolio stratum for the
recorded amount that exceeds fair value. Strata are defined based on predominant risk
characteristics of the underlying loans such as loan type and within type, by loan rate
intervals.
No impairment reserves were deemed necessary as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited), September
30, 2009 and 2008.
F-20
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 5 Office Properties and Equipment
Office properties and equipment at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008 are
summarized by major classifications as follows (dollars in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,394 |
|
Office buildings and improvements |
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
5,178 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment |
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, at Cost |
|
|
8,311 |
|
|
|
8,281 |
|
|
|
8,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,495 |
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Office Properties and Equipment, Net |
|
$ |
3,816 |
|
|
$ |
3,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization charged to operations was $164,000, $179,000, $353,000, and
$346,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and for the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note 6 Deposits
Deposit balances at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts |
|
$ |
125,273 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
$ |
120,896 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
$ |
92,705 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
% |
Demand and NOW
accounts, including
non-interest-bearing
deposits of $29,731 in
2010, $21,439 in 2009
and $22,160 in 2008 |
|
|
61,205 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
52,447 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
50,771 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
5,821 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
5,415 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
6,074 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,299 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
178,758 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
149,550 |
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 to 1.99% |
|
|
49,412 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
25,602 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
10,151 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
2.00 to 3.99% |
|
|
49,270 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
60,167 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
53,631 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
4.00 to 5.99% |
|
|
17,700 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
19,673 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
38,514 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
6.00 to 7.99% |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,897 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
108,176 |
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
105,082 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
311,196 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
286,934 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
254,632 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 6 Deposits (continued)
A summary of certificate accounts by maturity at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30,
2009, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
33,639 |
|
|
$ |
42,237 |
|
One to two years |
|
|
19,272 |
|
|
|
21,091 |
|
Two to three years |
|
|
16,997 |
|
|
|
15,873 |
|
Three to four years |
|
|
15,877 |
|
|
|
11,134 |
|
Four to five years |
|
|
19,541 |
|
|
|
4,689 |
|
After five years |
|
|
13,571 |
|
|
|
13,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,897 |
|
|
$ |
108,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense by deposit category for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited) and years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
Money market deposit accounts |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Savings and club accounts |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
Certificate accounts |
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
3,579 |
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,396 |
|
|
$ |
3,006 |
|
|
$ |
5,752 |
|
|
$ |
7,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amount of time certificates of deposit including Individual Retirement Accounts
with a minimum denomination of $100,000 at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009
and 2008 is $32,871,000, $28,479,000, and $22,268,000, respectively.
F-22
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 7 Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
Advances from the FHLB of Pittsburgh are collateralized by certain qualifying collateral such
as U.S. government and agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities and loans, with
weighted-average collateral values determined by the FHLB of Pittsburgh equal to at least the
unpaid amount of outstanding advances. At March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009
and 2008, advances from the FHLB consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Stated Maturity |
|
Rate |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/6/2009 |
|
|
5.66 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
7/27/2009 |
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
1/4/2010 |
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
3/22/2010 |
|
|
4.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
4/26/2010 |
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
5/3/2010 |
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
1/18/2011 |
|
|
4.64 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
2,190 |
|
4/15/2011 |
|
|
3.14 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
6/22/2011 |
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
8/17/2011 |
|
|
5.03 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
9/6/2011 |
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
9/12/2011 |
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
|
|
4,138 |
|
11/30/2011 |
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
7/9/2012 |
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
9/10/2012 |
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2012 |
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
3/25/2013 |
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
7/11/2013 |
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
9/9/2013 |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/21/2014 |
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/5/2015 |
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,078 |
|
|
$ |
46,618 |
|
|
$ |
50,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual maturities of FHLB advances at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009, were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
$ |
12,254 |
|
|
$ |
19,562 |
|
One to two years |
|
|
9,942 |
|
|
|
11,279 |
|
Two to three years |
|
|
10,424 |
|
|
|
5,673 |
|
Three to four years |
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
9,924 |
|
Four to five years |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
After five years |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,078 |
|
|
$ |
46,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 7 Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (continued)
The Bank has entered into a line of credit agreement whereby it can borrow up to $15,000,000
from the FHLB. The line was not drawn upon as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30,
2009 or 2008. The agreement expires in February 2012. The interest rate was .74% and .68% at
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009, respectively.
|
|
The maximum borrowing capacity from the FHLB at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30,
2009 is $134,500,000 and $111,069,000. |
Note 8 Securities Sold Under Agreement to Repurchase
Short-term borrowings consist of borrowings from securities sold under agreements to
repurchase. Average amounts outstanding during the year represent daily average balances, and
average interest rates represent interest expense divided by the related average balance.
The outstanding balances and related information for short-term borrowings are summarized as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at year end |
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
$ |
5,081 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
$ |
3,866 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
$ |
3,537 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding
during the year |
|
|
3,534 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
4,420 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding
at any month-end |
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Income Taxes
Total income tax expense (benefit) for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited) and for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
$ |
613 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
(282 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State, current |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 9 Income Taxes (continued)
The difference between the expected and actual tax provision expressed as percentage of earnings
before income tax provision are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Years Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected federal tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.6 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
26.6 |
|
Low income housing tax credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Nontaxable interest income |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
Other items, net |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
|
(24.7 |
)% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
40.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank is subject to the Pennsylvania and Maryland Mutual Thrift Institutions tax which is
calculated at 11.5 and 8.25 percent of earnings based on U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
The net deferred tax asset (liability) consisted of the following components as of March 31,
2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
Impairment reserves |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Purchase accounting |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(331 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets |
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 9 Income Taxes (continued)
Retained income at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009, includes $3,929,000 of
base year reserves for which no tax provision has been made. This amount represents deductions
for bad debt reserves for tax purposes, which were only allowed to savings institutions that
met certain definitional tests prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
The Small business Job Protection Act of 1996 eliminated the special bad debt deduction granted
solely to thrifts. Under the terms of the Act, there would be no recapture of the pre-1988
(base year) reserves. However, these pre-1998 reserves would be subject to recapture under the
rules of the Internal Revenue Code if the Bank itself pays a cash dividend in excess of
earnings and profits, or liquidates. The Act also provides for the recapture of deductions
arising from applicable excess reserve defined as the total amount of reserve over the period
base year reserve. The Banks total reserve exceeds the base year reserve, and deferred taxes
have been provided for this excess.
The tax provision for fiscal 2008 was significantly impacted by other-than-temporary declines
in market value during the period. The amount of tax benefit recognized on the impairment
charges was based on the tax characteristics of each security (capital or ordinary). Those
securities that are treated as capital for tax purposes have limited tax benefits recorded. On
October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabalization Act was enacted, which includes a
provision permitting banks to recognize losses relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock as an
ordinary loss, thereby allowing the Company to recognize a tax benefit on the losses. Had the
legislation been in effect as of September 30, 2008, and had the Company recognized the loss as
an ordinary loss for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, the positive impact recorded
would have been $510,000. The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $510,000 as of
September 30, 2008. The Company recognized an additional tax benefit of $510,000 in the
quarter ending December 31, 2008.
Note 10 Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Company is required to maintain a cash reserve balance in vault cash or with the Federal
Reserve Bank. The total of this reserve was approximately $1,265,000 and $1,882,000 at March
31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009, respectively.
The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory
and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a
direct material effect on the Companys financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet
specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Companys assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Companys capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company
to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total Tier I
capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier I
capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of March 31, 2010
(unaudited) and September 30, 2009, that the Company meets all capital adequacy requirements of
which it is subject.
As of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009, the FDIC categorized the Company as
well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be
categorized as well
capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I
leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that
notification that management believes have changed the Companys category.
F-26
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 10 Regulatory Capital Requirements (continued)
|
|
The Banks actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in
thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
35,431 |
|
|
|
14.48 |
% |
|
$ |
33,756 |
|
|
|
14.09 |
% |
|
$ |
31,303 |
|
|
|
14.33 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
19,575 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
19,173 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
17,470 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
24,469 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
23,966 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
21,837 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
Tier I Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
32,365 |
|
|
|
13.23 |
% |
|
$ |
30,748 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
% |
|
$ |
28,877 |
|
|
|
13.22 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
9,788 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
8,735 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
14,682 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
14,380 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
13,102 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
Tier I Capital
(to Average Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
$ |
32,365 |
|
|
|
8.44 |
% |
|
$ |
30,748 |
|
|
|
8.32 |
% |
|
$ |
28,877 |
|
|
|
8.45 |
% |
For Capital Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
15,340 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
14,789 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
13,667 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
To Be Well Capitalized |
|
|
19,175 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
18,486 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
17,084 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Note 11 Employee Benefit Plans
The Company participates in the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund (FIRF), a
multi-employer pension plan. FIRF provided defined pension benefits to substantially all of
the Companys employees. Effective August 1, 2005, the annual benefit provided to employees
under this defined benefit pension plan was frozen by Standard Bank. Freezing the plan
eliminates all future benefit accruals; however, the accrued benefit as of August 1, 2005,
remains. During the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and the years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $140,000, $471,000, $471,000, and $167,000,
respectively, as pension expense and made $32,000, $50,000, $50,000, and $222,000,
respectively, as contribution to FIRF.
The Company participates in the Financial Institutions Thrift Plan, a multi-employer 401(k)
plan, which provides benefits to substantially all of the Companys employees. Employees
contributions to the plan are matched by the Company up to a maximum of 3 percent of such
employees pretax salaries. Expense recognized for the plans was $41,000, $42,000, $86,000,
and $85,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and for the years
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company adopted a nonqualified phantom stock appreciation rights plan for key officers and
directors of the Bank on January 1, 2002. This plan is an incentive-driven benefit plan with
payout deferred until the end of the tenth plan year. Expense recognized for the plan was
$64,000, $48,000, $77,000, and $57,000 for the
six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and for the years ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
F-27
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 12 Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Risk
In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit in the form of loan commitments
and undisbursed home equity lines of credit. These off-balance sheet instruments involve, to
various degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk not reported in the statement of
financial condition.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to
these financial instruments is represented by the contract amount of the financial instrument.
The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments for off-balance sheet financial
instrument as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and
September 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family dwellings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments |
|
$ |
1,910 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
Undisbursed home equity lines of credit |
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
12,549 |
|
|
|
11,088 |
|
Undisbursed funds-construction loans in process |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
Commercial loan commitments |
|
|
12,471 |
|
|
|
12,144 |
|
|
|
15,927 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any conditions established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral
obtained, if deemed necessary, by the Company upon extension of credit is based on managements
credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but generally includes real
estate property. The majority of commitments to originate loans at March 31, 2010 (unaudited)
and September 30, 2009 and 2008 were for fixed rate loans. The Company grants loan commitments
at prevailing market rates of interest.
Note 13 Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted FASB ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures effective
January 1, 2008, which provides a frame work for measuring fair value under generally accepted
accounting procedures. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires
and entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be
used to measure fair value:
|
Level I: |
|
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
as of the reported date. |
|
|
Level II: |
|
Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are
either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these
assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded
less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the
parameters of which can be directly observed. |
|
|
Level III: |
|
Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the
reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using
managements best estimate of fair
value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant
management judgment or estimation. |
F-28
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 13 Fair Value Measurements (continued)
As required by FASB ASC Topic 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their
entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following tables present the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value as of
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 by level within the fair value hierarchy
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,857 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,857 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
Municipal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,876 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,371 |
|
Assets measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,158 |
|
|
$ |
69,977 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and agency
obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,871 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,871 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,780 |
|
Municipal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,736 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
Assets measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
69,083 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities Available for Sale
Fair values for securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique
that is widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on
quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship
to other benchmark quoted securities.
Foreclosed Real Estate
Fair values of foreclosed real estate were based on independent third-party appraisals of the
properties. These assets are included as Level II. All of the $1,112,000 and $1,002,000 of
real estate owned on the
F-29
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition is carried at fair value at March 31, 2010
(unaudited) and September 30, 2009.
Note 14 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires disclosure of fair value information
about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the statement of financial condition,
for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are
not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation
techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value
estimates cannot be sustained by comparison of independent markets and, in many cases, could
not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. GAAP excludes certain financial
instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly,
the aggregate fair value amounts do not represent the underlying value of the Company. The
carrying amounts reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition approximate
fair value for the following financial instruments: cash on hand and due from banks,
interest-earning deposits in other institutions, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, accrued interest
receivable, bank-owned life insurance, and accrued interest payable.
Fair values for investment securities and mortgage-backed securities are based on quoted
market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are
based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments with similar credit, maturity, and
interest rate characteristics. The fair values for one-to-four-family and other residential
loans are estimated using current market inputs at which loans with similar terms and qualities
would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Where quoted prices were available, such
market rates were utilized. The carrying amount of construction loans approximates its fair
value given their short-term nature. The fair values of loans secured by savings accounts,
consumer loans, second mortgage loans, automobile, home equity, commercial loans, and loans for
real estate sold on contract are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest
rates currently being offered for loans in the current market with similar terms to borrowers
of similar creditworthiness. The estimated fair value of nonperforming loans is the as is
appraised value of the underlying collateral.
The fair values of deposits with no stated maturities, which include non-interest-bearing
checking, NOW accounts, regular passbook, club accounts, and money market demand accounts, are
equal to the amount payable on demand at the repricing date (i.e., their carrying amounts).
Fair values of certificate accounts are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that
applies a comparable market interest rate to the aggregated weighted-average maturity of time
deposits.
Fair values of borrowed funds are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that
applies a comparable FHLB advance rate to the weighted average maturity of the borrowings.
There is no material difference between the carrying value and estimate fair value of
commitments to extend credit, which are generally priced at market at the time of commitment.
F-30
STANDARD MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 AND 2008
Note 14 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of the Companys financial assets and financial
liabilities at March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 (unaudited) |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on hand and due from banks |
|
$ |
2,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,121 |
|
|
$ |
2,121 |
|
Interst-earning deposits in other
institutions |
|
|
22,554 |
|
|
|
22,554 |
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
16,696 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
48,652 |
|
|
|
48,652 |
|
|
|
42,550 |
|
|
|
42,550 |
|
|
|
18,711 |
|
|
|
18,711 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
21,371 |
|
|
|
21,371 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
26,694 |
|
|
|
29,756 |
|
|
|
29,756 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
283,143 |
|
|
|
277,148 |
|
|
|
273,955 |
|
|
|
270,769 |
|
|
|
258,518 |
|
|
|
257,551 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
|
9,244 |
|
|
|
9,080 |
|
|
|
9,080 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
|
|
8,756 |
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
313,617 |
|
|
|
311,196 |
|
|
|
290,284 |
|
|
|
286,934 |
|
|
|
255,187 |
|
|
|
254,632 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
43,459 |
|
|
|
42,078 |
|
|
|
48,412 |
|
|
|
46,618 |
|
|
|
51,886 |
|
|
|
50,948 |
|
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
3,537 |
|
|
|
3,537 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Off-balance sheet financial insturments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment to extend credit and
letters of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15 Subsequent Events
The Company assessed events occurring subsequent to September 30, 2009, through December 14,
2009, for potential recognition and disclosure in the consolidated financial statements. No
events have occurred that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the consolidated
financial statements which were issued on December 14, 2009.
On June 8, 2010, the Board of Trustees approved a plan of conversion under which Standard
Mutual Holding Company would convert from a mutual holding company to a stock holding company.
The conversion to a stock holding company is subject to approval of the members of Standard
Mutual Holding Company, which are the depositors of Standard Bank, as well as the Pennsylvania
Department of Banking and the Federal Reserve Board. If such approvals are obtained, Standard
Mutual Holding Company will cease to exist as a separate legal entity and a stock holding
company, Standard Financial Corp., will issue and sell shares of capital stock to eligible
depositors and others as outlined in the Plan of Conversion. In addition, the Plan of
Conversion establishes a charitable foundation to be funded through a cash contribution and a
contribution of common stock of Standard Financial Corp. The cost of the conversion and the
issuing of common stock will be deferred and deducted from the proceeds of the stock offering.
In the event the conversion and the offering are not completed, any deferred costs will be
charged to operations.
F-31
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or that to which we have referred you. No person has
been authorized to give any information or to make any
representation other than as contained in this prospectus and,
if given or made, such other information or representation must
not be relied upon as having been authorized by Standard
Financial Corp. or Standard Bank. This prospectus does not
constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy
any of the securities offered hereby to any person in any
jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not
authorized or in which the person making such offer or
solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom
it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation in such
jurisdiction. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any
sale hereunder shall under any circumstances create any
implication that there has been no change in the affairs of
Standard Financial Corp. or Standard Bank since any of the dates
as of which information is furnished herein or since the date
hereof.
(Proposed Holding Company
for
Standard Bank)
Up to
3,450,000 Shares of
Common
Stock
Par value $0.01 per
share
(Subject to Increase to up to
3,967,500 Shares)
PROSPECTUS
August 12,
2010
Until September 17, 2010 or 25 days after
commencement of the syndicated community offering, if any,
whichever is later, all dealers effecting transactions in the
registered securities, whether or not participating in this
distribution, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is
in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver the
prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their
unsold allotments or subscriptions.