S-4/A
As filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2009
Registration Number
333-159148
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 7
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
VALIDUS HOLDINGS,
LTD.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
BERMUDA
|
|
6331
|
|
98-0501001
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
19 Par-La-Ville Road,
Hamilton, HM 11 Bermuda
(441) 278-9000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code,
of registrants principal
executive offices)
CT Corporation System
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York
10011
(212) 590-9200
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code,
of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Schuster, Esq.
|
|
Stephen F. Arcano, Esq.
|
|
C. Jerome Dill
|
|
Andrew S. Rowen, Esq.
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
|
Helene Banks, Esq.
|
|
Todd E. Freed, Esq.
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
Melissa Sawyer, Esq.
|
|
American International Building
|
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
|
|
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
|
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
|
|
29 Richmond Road
|
80 Pine Street
|
|
Flom LLP
|
|
19 Par-La-Ville Road
|
|
125 Broad Street
|
|
Pembroke, HM 08
|
New York, New York 10005
|
|
Four Times Square
|
|
Hamilton, HM 11 Bermuda
|
|
New York, New York 10004
|
|
Bermuda
|
(212) 701-3000
|
|
New York, New York 10036
(212) 735-3000
|
|
(441) 278-9000
|
|
(212) 558-4000
|
|
(441) 298-5100
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of
securities to the public: As soon as practicable
after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following
box o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the
appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this
transaction:
Exchange Act
Rule 13e-4(i)
(Cross-Border Issuer Tender
Offer) o
Exchange Act
Rule 14d-1(d)
(Cross-Border Third-Party Tender
Offer) o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
PRELIMINARY COPY SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
AUGUST 5, 2009
The information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is
not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be
sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities,
and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities, in
any jurisdiction where the offer or sale of these securities is
not permitted.
AN
AMALGAMATION PROPOSAL YOUR VOTE IS VERY
IMPORTANT
To the shareholders of Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) and the shareholders of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
(IPC):
On July 9, 2009, IPC, Validus and Validus Ltd., a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Validus, entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Amalgamation (the Amalgamation
Agreement).
Subject to shareholder approval as described herein and
satisfaction or waiver of the other conditions specified in the
Amalgamation Agreement, on the date the Amalgamation is
consummated (the Closing Date), IPC will amalgamate
with Validus Ltd. (the Amalgamation). IPC
shareholders (including the shareholders that do not vote in
favor of the Amalgamation) will have the right to receive 0.9727
common shares, par value $0.175 per share, of Validus
(Validus Shares), $7.50 in cash (less any applicable
withholding taxes and without interest) and cash in lieu of
fractional shares in exchange for each common share, par value
$0.01 per share, of IPC (an IPC Share) they hold,
unless they exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Bermuda law.
The Validus Special Meeting. Validus will hold a
special meeting of its shareholders (the Validus special
meeting), on
[ l ],
2009, at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, at the registered office of Validus, located at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda. Validus
shareholders will be asked at the Validus special meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to the
Amalgamation Agreement (the Share Issuance);
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment proposal in respect of the Validus
special meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in
favor of the above proposal, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the Validus special meeting.
|
Validus is soliciting proxies from holders of Validus Shares at
the Validus special meeting in order to be able to issue the
Validus Shares to IPC shareholders in connection with the
Amalgamation. The Share Issuance will become effective only if
it is approved by Validus shareholders and the Amalgamation is
consummated. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast at the Validus special meeting at which a quorum is present
in accordance with Validus bye-laws is required to approve
each matter to be acted on at the Validus special meeting. Even
if you previously voted on the issuance of Validus Shares at the
special general meeting of Validus shareholders held on
June 26, 2009, because the composition of the consideration
being offered by Validus to IPC shareholders was subsequently
changed, your vote is necessary at the Validus special meeting
in order to approve the Share Issuance.
Shareholders of record as of the close of business on
July 27, 2009 will be entitled to vote at the Validus
special meeting. As of July 27, 2009, there were
59,253,652 outstanding Validus Shares entitled to vote at
the Validus special meeting, and 19,771,422 Validus
non-voting common shares. Each Validus Share entitles the holder
of record thereof to one vote at the Validus special meeting;
however, if, and for so long as, the Validus Shares of a
shareholder, including any votes conferred by controlled
shares (as defined below), would otherwise represent more
than 9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all Validus Shares
entitled to vote on a matter, the votes conferred by such
Validus Shares will be reduced by whatever amount is necessary
such that, after giving effect to any such reduction (and any
other reductions in voting power required by Validus bye-
laws), the votes conferred by such Validus Shares represent
9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all Validus Shares
entitled to vote on such matter. Controlled shares
include all shares that a person is deemed to own directly,
indirectly or constructively (within the meaning of
Section 958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and
Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended).
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, Vestar Capital Partners, and New
Mountain Capital, LLC, which collectively owned approximately
38% of Validus outstanding voting common shares as of July
27, 2009, have agreed to vote in favor of the Share Issuance.
Validus knows of no specific matter to be brought before the
Validus special meeting that is not referred to in the notice of
the Validus special meeting. If any such matter comes before the
Validus special meeting, including any shareholder proposal
properly made, the proxy holders will vote proxies in accordance
with their judgment.
The IPC Special Meeting. IPC will hold
a special general meeting of its shareholders (the IPC
special meeting) on
[ l ],
2009, at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, at the registered office of IPC located at the
American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM
08, Bermuda. IPC shareholders will be asked at the IPC special
meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve an amendment to IPCs bye-laws to reduce the
shareholder vote required to approve an amalgamation with any
other company from the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the
votes cast thereon at a general meeting of the shareholders to a
simple majority (the IPC bye-law amendment);
|
|
|
|
to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment proposal in respect of the IPC special
meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in favor of
either of the above proposals, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the meeting.
|
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the IPC
special meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with
IPCs bye-laws, is required to approve the IPC bye-law
amendment, which will become immediately effective if so
approved. If the IPC bye-law amendment is approved, the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the IPC
special meeting will be required to adopt the Amalgamation
Agreement and approve the Amalgamation. If the IPC bye-law
amendment is not approved, the affirmative vote of three-fourths
of the votes cast at the IPC special meeting shall be required
to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast at the IPC special meeting is required to approve each
other matter to be acted on, including the approval of any
adjournment proposal.
Under IPCs bye-laws, with limited exceptions, any
shareholder owning, directly, indirectly or, in the case of any
U.S. person, constructively or by attribution, shares of
IPC with 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all
shares entitled to vote will have the voting rights attached to
such shares reduced so that it may not exercise more than
approximately 9.9% of the total voting rights. The reduction in
votes is generally applied in declining order based on the
number of such shares owned by each shareholder. Under these
provisions of IPCs bye-laws, certain shareholders may have
their voting rights limited to less than one vote per share.
Moreover, these provisions could have the effect of reducing the
voting power of certain shareholders who would not otherwise be
subject to the limitation by virtue of their direct share
ownership.
* *
*
Based on Validus and IPCs respective capitalizations
as of August 4, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 0.9727,
Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the
aggregate, approximately 38% of the issued and outstanding
Validus Shares on a fully-diluted basis following closing of the
Amalgamation. Validus will issue approximately 54,959,648
Validus Shares in connection with the Amalgamation. Validus will
apply to list these Validus Shares on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE), subject to official notice of
issuance.
Before the Amalgamation can close, Validus shareholders must
approve the Share Issuance at the Validus special meeting (or
any adjournment thereof) and IPC shareholders must adopt the
Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation at the IPC
special meeting (or any adjournment thereof).
Validus Shares are quoted on the NYSE under the symbol
VR. The closing price of a Validus Share on the NYSE
on August 4, 2009, the last practicable date prior to the
filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, was $23.61. IPC
Shares, which are currently quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol IPCR
and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol IPCR
BH, would be delisted upon completion of the Amalgamation.
The closing price of an IPC Share on NASDAQ on August 4,
2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, was $29.98. All references to
dollars and $ in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus refer to U.S. dollars.
Validus board of directors has authorized and approved
the Share Issuance and deems it fair, advisable and in the best
interests of Validus and its shareholders to consummate the
Share Issuance, the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement. Validus board
of directors recommends that Validus shareholders vote
FOR the proposals submitted to Validus shareholders
on the attached Validus proxy card.
IPCs board of directors has adopted the Amalgamation
Agreement and authorized and approved the Amalgamation of IPC
with Validus Ltd. upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Amalgamation Agreement, authorized and approved
the IPC bye-law amendment, and deems it fair, advisable and in
the best interests of IPC to enter into the Amalgamation
Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement.
IPCs board of directors recommends that IPC shareholders
vote FOR each proposal submitted to IPC shareholders
on the attached IPC proxy card.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides Validus and IPC
shareholders with detailed information about the Validus special
meeting, the IPC special meeting and the Amalgamation. You can
also obtain information from publicly available documents filed
by Validus and IPC with the SEC. Validus and IPC encourage
you to read this entire document carefully, including the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 34.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend
the Validus special meeting or the IPC special meeting, please
take time to vote by completing and mailing your enclosed proxy
card or by following the voting instructions provided to you if
you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee. If
you do not receive such instructions, you may request them from
that firm.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
Edward J. Noonan
|
|
John R. Weale
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved the
Share Issuance, passed upon the merits or fairness of the Share
Issuance or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the
disclosure in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy
materials for the Validus special meeting to be held on
[ l ],
2009 and the IPC special meeting to be held on
[ l ],
2009
The joint proxy statement/prospectus and the related proxy
materials are available free of charge on Validus website
at www.validusre.bm and on IPCs website at www.ipcre.bm.
This
joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated
[ l ],
2009
and is first being mailed to Validus and IPC shareholders on or
about
[ l ],
2009
SOURCES
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus includes information,
including important business and financial information, also set
forth in documents filed by Validus and IPC with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC), and those documents
include information about Validus and IPC that is not included
in or delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You
can obtain any of the documents filed by Validus or IPC, as the
case may be, with the SEC from the SEC or, without charge, from
the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Validus and IPC shareholders also may obtain documents filed
with the SEC or documents incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus free of cost, by directing a
written or oral request to the appropriate company at:
|
|
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Attention: Jon Levenson
(441) 278-9000
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
American International Building
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke HM 08
Bermuda
Attention: Melanie J. Saunders
(441) 298-5100
|
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least ten business days
before the date of the relevant meeting. This means you must
request this information no later than
[ l ],
2009. Validus or IPC, as the case may be, will mail properly
requested documents to requesting shareholders by first class
mail, or another equally prompt means, within one business day
after receipt of such request.
See Where You Can Find More Information on page 158.
19 Par-La-Ville
Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON
[ l ],
2009
[ l ],
2009
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of Shareholders of
Validus Holdings, Ltd. (Validus) will be held at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda, on
[ l ],
2009, at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of Validus voting common shares, par
value $0.175 per share, pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement
(as defined in the joint proxy statement/prospectus on the
following pages);
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment proposal in respect of the meeting for
the solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the above
proposal, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may be
lawfully brought before the meeting.
|
For further information concerning matters to be acted upon at
the Validus special meeting, you are urged to read the joint
proxy statement/prospectus on the following pages.
If you are a Validus shareholder of record, please complete,
sign, date and return the enclosed proxy in the return envelope
furnished for that purpose, as promptly as possible, whether or
not you plan to attend the meeting, or follow the instructions
on the Validus proxy card to complete your proxy card on the
Internet at the website indicated or by telephone. If you own
your shares through a bank, broker, or other nominee, you will
receive instructions from that institution on how to instruct
them to vote your shares, including by completing a voting
instruction form, or providing instructions by Internet or
telephone. If you do not receive such instructions, you may
contact that institution to request them. If you later desire to
revoke your proxy for any reason, you may do so in the manner
described in the attached joint proxy statement/prospectus. Only
shareholders of record as shown on the transfer books of Validus
at the close of business on July 27, 2009 will be entitled
to notice of, and to vote at, the Validus special meeting or any
adjournments thereof. See The Validus Special Meeting
beginning on page 112 in the joint proxy
statement/prospectus for more information.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Lorraine Dean
Secretary
American
International Building
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD
[ l ],
2009
[ l ],
2009
Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of Shareholders of
IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC) will be held at the
registered office of IPC, located at the American International
Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda, commencing
at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, on
[ l ],
2009, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve an amendment to IPCs bye-laws to reduce the
shareholder vote required to approve an amalgamation with any
other company from the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the
votes cast thereon at a general meeting of the shareholders to a
simple majority, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation, dated as of July 9, 2009, between IPC,
Validus Holdings, Ltd. (Validus) and Validus Ltd.
(the Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the resulting
amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment of the meeting for the solicitation of
additional IPC proxies in favor of either of the above
proposals, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the meeting.
|
Information concerning the matters to be acted upon at the IPC
special meeting is set forth in the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Under the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, each outstanding
IPC common share (including any shares held by IPC shareholders
that do not vote in favor of the amalgamation, but excluding any
shares as to which appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant
to Bermuda law), will be cancelled and converted into the right
to receive 0.9727 common shares of Validus, $7.50 in cash, less
any applicable withholding tax and without interest, and cash in
lieu of fractional shares upon closing of the amalgamation.
Under Bermuda law, in the event of an amalgamation of a Bermuda
company with another company or corporation, any shareholder of
the Bermuda company is entitled to receive fair value for its
shares. IPCs board of directors considers the fair value
for each IPC common share to be $7.50 plus 0.9727 Validus common
shares, providing IPC shareholders with a value of $29.48 for
each IPC common share as based on the closing price of Validus
common shares on July 8, 2009, the day immediately
preceding the public announcement of the proposed amalgamation.
Any IPC shareholder that is not satisfied that it has been
offered fair value for its IPC common shares and whose shares
are not voted in favor of the Amalgamation Agreement and the
amalgamation may exercise its appraisal rights under the
Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, as amended (the Companies
Act) to have the fair value of its IPC common shares
appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda (the
Court). Any IPC shareholder intending to exercise
appraisal rights MUST file its application for appraisal of the
fair value of its IPC common shares with the Court within ONE
MONTH after the date the notice convening the IPC special
meeting is deemed to have been received.
Only shareholders of record, as shown on IPCs register of
members or branch register, at the close of business on
July 27, 2009, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the IPC special meeting or any adjournments thereof, or to
exercise the appraisal rights conferred on dissenting
shareholders by Bermuda law.
If you are an IPC shareholder of record, please sign, date and
return the enclosed proxy in the return envelope furnished for
that purpose, as promptly as possible, whether or not you plan
to attend the IPC special meeting. If you own your shares
through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will receive
instructions from that institution on how to instruct them to
vote your shares, including by completing a proxy card, or
providing instructions by Internet or telephone. If you later
desire to revoke your proxy for any reason, you may do so in the
manner described in the attached joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See The IPC Special Meeting on
page 115 in the accompanying joint proxy
statement/prospectus for more information.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Melanie J. Saunders
Secretary
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE AMALGAMATION AND THE MEETINGS
The following questions and answers highlight selected
information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus and may
not contain all the information that is important to you. We
encourage you to read this entire document carefully.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where are the shareholder meetings? |
|
A1: |
|
The Validus special meeting will take place at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, on
[ l ],
2009, at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda. |
|
A2: |
|
The IPC special meeting will take place at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, on
[ l ],
2009, at the American International Building, 29 Richmond Road,
Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda. |
|
Q: |
|
What is happening at the shareholder meetings? |
|
A1: |
|
At the Validus special meeting, Validus shareholders will be
asked: |
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares pursuant
to the Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the meeting for the
solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the above
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as
may be lawfully brought before the meeting.
|
|
|
|
Even if Validus shareholders approve the Share Issuance, the
Share Issuance will take effect only if and when the
Amalgamation closes. |
|
A2: |
|
At the IPC special meeting, IPC shareholders will be asked: |
|
|
|
to approve an amendment to IPCs bye-laws to
reduce the shareholder vote required to approve an amalgamation
with any other company from the affirmative vote of
three-fourths of the votes cast thereon at a general meeting of
the shareholders to a simple majority;
|
|
|
|
to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment proposal in respect of the
IPC special meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies
in favor of the foregoing proposals, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as
may lawfully be brought before the meeting.
|
|
Q: |
|
What will happen in the Amalgamation? |
|
A: |
|
If Validus shareholders approve the Share Issuance, and if IPC
shareholders adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation, and all other conditions to the Amalgamation have
been satisfied or waived, IPC will amalgamate with Validus Ltd.,
a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Validus, upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the Amalgamation
Agreement. Upon the closing of the Amalgamation, the separate
corporate existence of Validus Ltd. and IPC will cease and they
will continue as a combined entity and subsidiary of Validus and
the name of the combined entity shall be Validus Ltd. |
|
Q: |
|
Why are Validus and IPC proposing the Amalgamation? |
|
A1: |
|
Based on a number of factors described under The
Amalgamation Reasons Why Validus Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Share Issuance,
Validus board of directors believes that the Amalgamation
represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit
that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the
global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the
Amalgamation would allow Validus shareholders to benefit from
the superior growth potential of a combined company that would
be a leading carrier in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance
and insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality
diversification in profitable business lines. |
|
A2: |
|
Based on a number of factors, including those described under
The Amalgamation Reasons Why IPCs Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Amalgamation and the IPC
Bye-law Amendment, IPCs board of directors adopted the
Amalgamation Agreement and authorized and approved the IPC
bye-law amendment. IPCs board of directors believes that
each of the Amalgamation and the IPC bye-law amendment is in the
best interests of IPC. In making this determination, IPCs
board of directors considered |
iv
|
|
|
|
|
factors including the amount and type of consideration pursuant
to the Amalgamation, the certainty for IPC and its shareholders,
the anticipated timing of signing and closing, and the other
terms and conditions of Validus offer. |
|
Q: |
|
What would IPC shareholders receive in the Amalgamation? |
|
A: |
|
Under the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, each outstanding
IPC Share (including any shares held by IPC shareholders that do
not vote in favor of the Amalgamation, but excluding any
dissenting shares as to which appraisal rights have been
exercised pursuant to Bermuda law and excluding any shares held
by Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries) would
be cancelled and converted into the right to receive
(i) 0.9727 Validus Shares, (ii) $7.50 in cash,
less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, and
(iii) cash in lieu of fractional shares, upon closing of
the Amalgamation. |
|
|
|
IPC shareholders would not receive any fractional Validus Shares
in the Amalgamation. Instead, IPC shareholders would be paid
cash in lieu of the fractional share interest to which such
shareholders would otherwise be entitled. |
|
Q: |
|
What percentage of Validus Shares will the former holders of
IPC Shares own, in the aggregate, after the Amalgamation? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Based on Validus and IPCs respective capitalizations
as of August 4, 2009, and the exchange ratio of 0.9727,
Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the
aggregate, approximately 38% of the issued and outstanding
Validus Shares on a fully-diluted basis following closing of the
Amalgamation. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are shareholders able to exercise appraisal rights? |
|
A1: |
|
Validus shareholders will not be entitled to exercise appraisal
rights with respect to any matter to be voted upon at the
Validus special meeting. |
|
A2: |
|
IPC shareholders who do not vote in favor of the Amalgamation
Agreement and the Amalgamation and who are not satisfied that
they have been offered fair value for their IPC Shares may
exercise, within one month after the date the notice convening
the IPC special meeting is deemed to have been received,
appraisal rights under Bermuda law to have the fair value of
their IPC Shares appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda (the
Court), subject to compliance with all of the
required procedures, as described under The
Amalgamation Dissenters Rights of Appraisal
for IPC Shareholders. |
|
Q: |
|
What will be the composition of the board of directors of
Validus following the effectiveness of the Amalgamation? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Upon the effectiveness of the Amalgamation, Validus board
of directors would consist of the directors serving on the board
of directors of Validus before the Amalgamation. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will Validus be managed after the Amalgamation? |
|
A: |
|
Upon closing of the Amalgamation, the officers of Validus will
be the officers serving Validus before the Amalgamation. |
|
Q: |
|
When do the parties expect to complete the Amalgamation? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The parties expect to complete the Amalgamation in the third
quarter of 2009, although there can be no assurance that the
parties will be able to do so. The closing of the Amalgamation
is subject to customary closing conditions, including
shareholder and bank approvals and receipt of certain other
regulatory approvals. Please see The Amalgamation
Agreement Conditions to the Amalgamation on
page 106. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Will I be taxed on the amalgamation consideration I
receive? |
|
A: |
|
IPC and Validus intend for the Amalgamation to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), and completion of the Amalgamation is
conditioned on Validus and IPC receiving tax opinions to this
effect from Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp and
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, respectively. Assuming the
Amalgamation so qualifies, a U.S. holder of IPC Shares that
exchanges IPC Shares for Validus Shares and cash in the
Amalgamation will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of cash
received by such U.S. holder in the Amalgamation (excluding
any cash received in lieu of a fractional |
v
|
|
|
|
|
Validus Share) and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the
sum of the cash and the fair market value of the Validus Shares
received by such U.S. holder (including the fair market
value of any fractional Validus Share deemed received), over
(b) the U.S. holders tax basis in the IPC Shares
exchanged pursuant to the Amalgamation. Subject to the passive
foreign investment company rules or the potential application of
Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized upon the
exchange generally will be capital gain, unless the receipt of
cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of the distribution of
a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For more
information, please see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus under the caption Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences. |
|
|
|
Tax matters are complicated and the tax consequences of the
Amalgamation to you will depend upon the facts of your
particular circumstances. Because individual circumstances may
differ, Validus urges you to consult with your own tax advisor
as to the specific tax consequences of the Amalgamation to you,
including the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local,
non-U.S. and
other tax laws. |
|
Q: |
|
What shareholder vote is required to approve the proposals at
the Validus special meeting and the IPC special meeting and how
many votes must be present to hold the meetings? |
|
|
|
A1: |
|
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is present in
accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required to approve
the Share Issuance. The quorum required at the Validus special
meeting is two or more shareholders present in person and
representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total
issued Validus Shares throughout the meeting. The Share Issuance
will become effective only if it is duly approved by Validus
shareholders and all of the other conditions to the Amalgamation
are satisfied or waived and the Amalgamation closes. The
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Validus
special meeting is required to approve each other matter to be
acted on, including any adjournment proposal. Aquiline Capital
Partners LLC, Vestar Capital Partners, and New Mountain Capital,
LLC, which collectively owned approximately 38% of Validus
outstanding voting common shares as of July 27, 2009, have
agreed to vote in favor of the issuance of Validus shares in
connection with the transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you previously voted on the issuance of Validus Shares
at the special general meeting of Validus shareholders held on
June 26, 2009, because the composition of the consideration
being offered by Validus to IPC shareholders was subsequently
changed, your vote is necessary at the Validus special meeting
in order to approve the Share Issuance. |
|
|
|
A2: |
|
With respect to the IPC special meeting, the affirmative vote of
a majority of the votes cast at the IPC special meeting, at
which a quorum is present in accordance with IPCs
bye-laws, is required to approve the IPC bye-law amendment,
which will become immediately effective if so approved. The
quorum required at the IPC special meeting is two or more
shareholders present in person and representing in person or by
proxy more than 50% of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares
throughout the meeting. If the IPC bye-law amendment is
approved, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast
at the IPC special meeting is required to adopt the Amalgamation
Agreement and approve the Amalgamation. If the IPC bye-law
amendment is not approved, the affirmative vote of three-fourths
of the votes cast at the IPC special meeting will be required to
adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the IPC
special meeting is required to approve each other matter to be
acted on, including any adjournment proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
Do the boards of directors recommend approval of the
proposals? |
|
A1: |
|
Yes. Validus board of directors, taking into consideration
the reasons discussed under The Amalgamation
Reasons Why Validus Board of Directors Recommends Approval
of the Share Issuance, adopted the Amalgamation Agreement
and authorized and approved the Share Issuance. Validus
board of directors deems it fair, advisable and in the best
interests of Validus to enter into the Amalgamation Agreement
and to acquire all of the outstanding IPC Shares and to
consummate the Share Issuance. Validus board of
directors recommends that Validus shareholders vote
FOR each matter submitted on the Validus proxy
card. |
|
A2: |
|
Yes. IPCs board of directors, taking into consideration
the reasons discussed under The Amalgamation
Reasons Why IPCs Board of Directors Recommends Approval of
the Amalgamation and the IPC bye-law |
vi
|
|
|
|
|
amendment, adopted the Amalgamation Agreement and
authorized and approved the amalgamation of IPC with Validus
Ltd. upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in
the Amalgamation Agreement, authorized and approved the IPC
bye-law amendment, and deems it fair, advisable and in the best
interests of IPC to enter into the Amalgamation Agreement and to
consummate the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated thereby. IPCs board of directors
recommends that you vote FOR each matter submitted
on the IPC proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the record date for each special meeting? |
|
A1: |
|
The record date for the Validus special meeting is July 27,
2009 (the Validus record date). Only Validus
shareholders at the close of business on the Validus record date
will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Validus
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
|
A2: |
|
The record date for the IPC special meeting is July 27,
2009 (the IPC record date). Only IPC shareholders at
the close of business on the IPC record date will be entitled to
notice of, and to vote at, the IPC special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
The parties urge you to read carefully this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including its annexes and the documents
incorporated by reference herein. You also may want to review
the documents referenced under Where You Can Find More
Information and consult with your accounting, legal and tax
advisors. Once you have considered all relevant information, the
parties encourage you to fill in and return the relevant proxy
card (if you are a shareholder of record) or voting instruction
form you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee (if you
hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee (in
street name)). |
|
Q: |
|
How can I vote my shares in person at the Validus special
meeting or the IPC special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If your Validus Shares or IPC Shares are registered directly in
your name as of the record date with the relevant transfer
agent, you are considered the shareholder of record
with respect to those shares, and the proxy materials and proxy
card are being sent directly to you. As the shareholder of
record, you have the right to vote in person at the Validus
special meeting or the IPC special meeting. If you choose to do
so, you can bring the enclosed proxy card to the relevant
special meeting and vote in person. Most shareholders of Validus
and IPC hold their shares in street name rather than directly in
their own name. If you hold your shares in street name, you are
a beneficial holder, and the proxy materials are
being forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other nominee
together with a voting instruction form. Because a beneficial
holder is not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these
shares in person at the meeting unless you have either arranged
for the shares beneficially owned by you to be transferred of
record into your name by the record date for the special meeting
or secured a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank,
broker or other nominee that holds your shares as of the record
date for the relevant special meeting (and who has received a
valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder of record
pursuant to a legal proxy with a power of
subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record
date) and present that proxy at the relevant special meeting.
Even if you plan to attend the Validus special meeting or IPC
special meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in
advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if
you later decide not to attend the relevant special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How can I vote my shares without attending the Validus
special meeting or the IPC special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If you are the shareholder of record, you may direct your vote
without attending the Validus special meeting or the IPC special
meeting by completing and mailing your proxy card in the
enclosed pre-paid envelope. If you hold your shares in street
name you should complete and return the voting instruction form
you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee in
accordance with the instructions you receive from your bank,
broker or other nominee. Your voting instruction form may
contain instructions from your bank, broker or other nominee
that allow you to vote your shares using the Internet or by
telephone. Please consult with your bank, broker or other
nominee if you have any questions regarding the voting of shares
held in street name. |
|
|
|
In addition, if you are a Validus shareholder of record, you may
grant a proxy to vote your shares at the Validus special meeting
by telephone by calling
866-367-5524
and following the simple recorded instructions, twenty-four
hours a day, seven days a week, at any time prior to
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on the |
vii
|
|
|
|
|
day prior to the Validus special meeting. Alternatively, as a
Validus shareholder of record, you may vote via the Internet at
any time prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on the day
prior to the Validus special meeting by going to
http://proxy.georgeson.com,
entering the company number and control number on your proxy
card and following the instructions to submit an electronic
proxy. If you vote by telephone or the Internet, you will be
required to provide the control number contained on your proxy
card. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need for admission to the Validus special meeting
or the IPC special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
You are entitled to attend the Validus special meeting or IPC
special meeting only if you are (i) a shareholder of record
or (ii) a beneficial owner or other person holding a valid
proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your
shares (and who has received a legal proxy, with a
power of subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as of the
record date). If you are the shareholder of record, your name
will be verified against the list of shareholders of record
prior to your admittance to the Validus special meeting or IPC
special meeting. You should be prepared to present photo
identification for admission. If you hold your shares in street
name and would like to be admitted to the meeting, you will need
to provide a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank,
broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has
received a legal proxy, with a power of
subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as of the record
date) and proof of beneficial ownership on the relevant record
date, such as a brokerage account statement showing that you
owned Validus Shares or IPC Shares as of the relevant record
date, a copy of the voting instruction form provided by your
bank, broker or other nominee, or other similar evidence of
ownership as of the record date, as well as your photo
identification. If you do not comply with the procedures
outlined above, you may not be admitted to the Validus special
meeting or IPC special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in a brokerage account or in street
name, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
If you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee,
you will receive instructions from that institution on how to
instruct them to vote your shares, including by completing a
voting instruction form, or providing instructions by Internet
or telephone. If you do not receive such instructions, you may
contact that institution to request them. In accordance with
NYSE rules, banks, brokers and other nominees who hold shares in
street-name for customers may not exercise their voting
discretion with respect to the proposals. Accordingly, if you do
not provide your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions
on how to vote your street name shares, your bank, broker or
other nominee will not be permitted to vote them at the Validus
special meeting or IPC special meeting, possibly resulting in a
broker non-vote. |
|
|
|
A broker non-vote with respect to the Validus
special meeting or IPC special meeting will not be considered as
a vote cast with respect to any matter presented at the Validus
special meeting or IPC special meeting, but will be counted for
purposes of establishing a quorum, provided that your
bank, broker or other nominee is in attendance in person or by
proxy. |
|
|
|
Because your bank, broker or other nominee will not have
discretionary authority to vote your shares, you must provide
your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions on how to
vote your shares or arrange to attend the Validus special
meeting or IPC special meeting and vote your shares in person if
you want your shares to be voted and to avoid a broker non-vote. |
|
Q: |
|
What effect do abstentions and broker non-votes have on the
proposals? |
|
A: |
|
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered
votes cast on any proposal brought before, the Validus special
meeting or IPC special meeting. Because the vote required to
approve the proposals is the affirmative vote of the required
percentage of the votes cast assuming a quorum is present, a
broker non-vote with respect to any proposal to be voted on at
the Validus or IPC special meeting will not have the effect of a
vote for or against the relevant proposal, but will reduce the
number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative
influence of those shareholders voting. See also The Validus
Special Meeting Record Date and Shares Entitled to
Vote and The IPC Special Meeting Record Date
and Shares Entitled to Vote. |
|
Q: |
|
How will my shares be voted if I sign and return a proxy card
or voting instruction form without specifying how to vote my
shares? |
viii
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you sign and return a proxy card or voting instruction form
without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be
voted FOR the proposals on the proxy card and as the
persons named as proxies may determine in their discretion with
respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote
before the Validus special meeting or IPC special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I do if I want to change my vote or revoke my
proxy? |
|
A: |
|
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before
your proxy is voted at the Validus special meeting or the IPC
special meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you may
change your vote or revoke your proxy by: (1) delivering to
Validus or IPC, a written notice of revocation of your proxy;
(2) delivering to Validus or IPC an authorized proxy
bearing a later date (including, for Validus shareholders, a
proxy by telephone or over the Internet); or (3) attending
the Validus special meeting or IPC special meeting and voting in
person as described above under the question entitled How can
I vote my shares in person at the Validus special meeting or IPC
special meeting? Attendance at the Validus special meeting
or IPC special meeting in and of itself, without voting in
person at the Validus special meeting or IPC special meeting,
will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked. For
shares you hold in street name, you should follow the
instructions of your bank, broker or other nominee or, if you
have obtained a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank,
broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has
received a legal proxy, with a power of
subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as of the record
date) giving you the right to vote your shares at the Validus
special meeting or IPC special meeting, by attending the Validus
special meeting or IPC special meeting and voting in person. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can I contact with any additional questions? |
|
A1: |
|
Validus shareholders: |
|
|
|
If you have additional questions about the Amalgamation, if you
would like additional copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, or if you need assistance voting your
Validus Shares, you should contact Georgeson Inc.
(Georgeson) at: |
|
|
|
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street,
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokerage Firms Please Call:
(212) 440-9800
All Others Please Call Toll Free:
(888) 274-5146
E-mail
inquiries: validus@georgeson.com |
|
A2: |
|
IPC shareholders: |
|
|
|
If you have additional questions about the Amalgamation, if you
would like additional copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, or if you need assistance voting your IPC
Shares, you should contact Innisfree M&A Incorporated
(Innisfree) at: |
|
|
|
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue
20th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Toll-Free for Shareholders:
(877) 825-8621
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5834 |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about the companies? |
|
A: |
|
You can find more information about Validus and IPC in the
documents described under Where You Can Find More
Information. |
ix
SUMMARY
This summary highlights the material information in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. To fully understand the
proposals, and for a more complete description of the terms of
the Amalgamation, you should read carefully this entire
document, including the exhibits, and documents incorporated by
reference herein, and the other documents referred to herein.
For information on how to obtain the documents that are on file
with the SEC, please see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Where You Can Find More
Information.
The
Companies (page 33)
Validus
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company with its principal
executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is
(441) 278-9000.
Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting
its operations worldwide through two wholly owned subsidiaries,
Validus Reinsurance Ltd. (Validus Re) and Talbot.
Validus Re is a Bermuda-based reinsurer focused on short-tail
lines of reinsurance. Talbot is the Bermuda parent of the
specialty insurance group primarily operating within the
Lloyds insurance market through Syndicate 1183. As of
March 31, 2009, Validus had total shareholders equity
of $2.023 billion and total assets of $4.763 billion.
Validus Shares are traded on the NYSE under the symbol
VR and, as of August 4, 2009, the last
practicable date prior to the filing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, Validus had a market capitalization of
approximately $1.797 billion. Validus has approximately
280 employees.
As of the date of the filing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus with the SEC, Validus was the registered
holder of 100 IPC Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC
Shares.
IPC
IPC, a Bermuda exempted company, provides property catastrophe
reinsurance and, to a limited extent,
property-per-risk
excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93%
of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property
catastrophe reinsurance covers against unpredictable events such
as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods
and other man-made or natural disasters. The substantial
majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe Limited
(IPCRe), IPCs Bermuda-based property
catastrophe reinsurance subsidiary, has been, and continues to
be, written on an excess of loss basis for primary insurers
rather than reinsurers, and is subject to aggregate limits on
exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had approximately 258
clients from whom it received either annual/deposit or
adjustment premiums, including many of the leading insurance
companies around the world. In 2008, approximately 36% of those
clients were based in the United States, and approximately 53%
of gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
related primarily to U.S. risks. IPCs
non-U.S. clients
and its
non-U.S. covered
risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and
New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for
more than 3.7% of IPCs gross premiums written, excluding
reinstatement premiums. As of March 31, 2009, IPC had total
shareholders equity of $1.849 billion and total
assets of $2.453 billion.
IPC Shares are quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under
the ticker symbol IPCR and the Bermuda Stock
Exchange under the symbol IPCR BH. IPCs
principal executive offices are located at American
International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08,
Bermuda and its telephone number is
(441) 298-5100.
1
The
Validus Special Meeting (page 112)
The Validus special meeting will be held on
[ l ],
at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, at the registered office of Validus, located at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda. Validus
shareholders will be asked at the Validus special meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the Share Issuance;
|
|
|
|
to approve the adjournment of the Validus special meeting for
the solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the above
proposal, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the Validus special meeting.
|
You can vote at the Validus special meeting only if you are a
shareholder of record, as shown by the transfer books of
Validus, at the close of business on July 27, 2009, which
is the record date for the Validus special meeting.
The IPC
Special Meeting (page 115)
The IPC special meeting will be held on
[ l ],
2009, at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, at the registered office of IPC, located at the
American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke, HM
08, Bermuda. IPC shareholders will be asked at the IPC special
meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the IPC bye-law amendment;
|
|
|
|
to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment of the meeting for the solicitation of
additional proxies in favor of either of the above proposals, if
necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the meeting.
|
You can vote at the IPC special meeting only if you are a
shareholder of record, as shown on IPCs register of
members or branch register at the close of business on
July 27, 2009, which is the record date for the IPC special
meeting.
The
Amalgamation (page 38)
General
Description (page 38)
On July 9, 2009, IPC, Validus and Validus Ltd., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Validus, entered into an Agreement and Plan
of Amalgamation (the Amalgamation Agreement).
Validus board of directors unanimously adopted the
Amalgamation Agreement on that date and deemed it fair,
advisable and in the best interests of Validus to enter into the
Amalgamation Agreement and to consummate the Share Issuance and
the other transactions contemplated thereby. IPCs board of
directors unanimously adopted the Amalgamation Agreement on that
date and authorized and approved the amalgamation of IPC with
Validus Ltd. upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Amalgamation Agreement and deemed it fair to,
advisable to and in the best interests of IPC to enter into the
Amalgamation Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation and
the other transactions contemplated thereby.
Subject to shareholder approval as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and the satisfaction or waiver of the other
conditions specified in the Amalgamation Agreement, on the
Closing Date of the Amalgamation, IPC will amalgamate with
Validus Ltd. Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, after the
effective time of the Amalgamation, IPC shareholders (other than
shareholders that exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Bermuda
law, and other than Validus and its subsidiaries) will have the
right to receive 0.9727 Validus Shares, $7.50 in cash, less any
applicable withholding tax and without interest, and cash in
lieu of fractional shares (the amalgamation
consideration) in exchange for each IPC Share they hold.
2
Further details relating to the structure of the Amalgamation
and the amalgamation consideration are described in The
Amalgamation Agreement Structure of the
Amalgamation and The Amalgamation Agreement
Amalgamation Consideration.
Recommendation
of Validus Board of Directors
(page 118)
Validus board of directors has adopted the Amalgamation
Agreement and authorized and approved the Share Issuance, and
deems it fair, advisable and in the best interests of Validus to
consummate the Share Issuance, the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated thereby. Validus board of
directors recommends that Validus shareholders vote
FOR the proposals submitted to Validus shareholders
on the attached Validus proxy card.
Recommendation
of IPCs Board of Directors (page 119)
IPCs board of directors has adopted the Amalgamation
Agreement and authorized and approved the Amalgamation upon the
terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the
Amalgamation Agreement, authorized and approved the IPC bye-law
amendment, and deems it fair, advisable and in the best
interests of IPC to enter into the Amalgamation Agreement and to
consummate the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement. IPCs board of
directors recommends that IPC shareholders vote FOR
each proposal submitted to IPC shareholders on the attached IPC
proxy card.
Reasons
Why Validus Board of Directors Recommends Approval of the
Share Issuance (page 59)
Validus board of directors recommends approval of the
Share Issuance in order to issue shares that are necessary to
effect the Amalgamation. Validus board of directors
believes that the Amalgamation represents a compelling
combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable Validus
to capitalize on opportunities in the global reinsurance market.
Successful completion of the Amalgamation would allow Validus
shareholders to benefit from the superior growth potential of a
combined company that would be a leading carrier in
Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets,
with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification in
profitable business lines.
In reaching these conclusions and in determining that the Share
Issuance is fair, advisable and in the best interests of
Validus, and in recommending the approval of the Share Issuance,
Validus board of directors consulted with Validus
management as well as legal and financial advisors and
considered a number of factors. Those factors included, but were
not limited to, those set forth under The
Amalgamation Reasons Why Validus Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Share Issuance.
Reasons
Why IPCs Board of Directors Recommends Approval of the
Amalgamation and the IPC Bye-Law Amendment
(page 62)
IPCs board of directors recommends approval of the
Amalgamation and the IPC bye-law amendment based on a number of
factors including those described under The
Amalgamation Reasons Why IPCs Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Amalgamation and the IPC
Bye-law Amendment. IPCs board of directors believes
that each of the Amalgamation and the IPC bye-law amendment is
in the best interests of IPC. In making this determination,
IPCs board of directors considered factors including the
amount and type of consideration pursuant to the Amalgamation,
the certainty for IPC and its shareholders, the anticipated
timing of signing and closing, and the other terms and
conditions of Validus offer.
In the course of making the above determinations and
recommendations, IPCs board of directors considered a
number of potential benefits of the Amalgamation, which in the
aggregate IPCs board of directors believes supported its
decision, including those set forth under The
Amalgamation Reasons Why IPCs Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Amalgamation and the IPC
Bye-law Amendment.
Opinion
of Greenhill & Co., LLC, Financial Advisor to Validus
Board (page 67)
Validus board of directors received an oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, from Greenhill & Co.,
LLC (Greenhill) that, based upon and subject to the
various limitations and assumptions described in the written
opinion, as of July 8, 2009, the consideration pursuant to
the proposed Amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Validus.
3
The full text of the written opinion of Greenhill, dated
July 8, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limits on the opinion and the review undertaken in connection
with rendering the opinion, is attached as Annex C to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by
reference. Validus shareholders are urged to read the opinion in
its entirety, but should note that it is not a recommendation as
to how Validus shareholders should vote with respect to the
issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation
Agreement or any other matter.
Opinion
of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Financial Advisor to IPCs
Board (page 74)
At the meeting of IPCs board of directors on July 8,
2009, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JPMorgan)
rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, to
IPCs board of directors that, as of such date and based
upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its
opinion, the amalgamation consideration to be paid to the
holders of IPC Shares in the proposed Amalgamation was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders (other than
Validus and its affiliates).
The full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan, dated
July 8, 2009, which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is
attached as Annex D to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference.
IPCs shareholders are urged to read the opinion in its
entirety. JPMorgans written opinion is addressed to
IPCs board of directors, addresses only the fairness, from
a financial point of view, to the holders of IPC Shares (other
than Validus and its affiliates) of the amalgamation
consideration to be paid to such holders of IPC Shares in
the proposed Amalgamation and does not constitute a
recommendation to any shareholder of IPC as to how such
shareholder should vote at the IPC special meeting.
Interests
of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation
(page 86)
In considering the recommendations of IPCs board of
directors that IPC shareholders vote FOR the IPC
bye-law amendment, and the approval and adoption of the
Amalgamation Agreement, IPC shareholders should be aware that
John R. Weale, Peter J. A. Cozens, and Stephen F.
Fallon, individually, and all the members of IPCs board of
directors as a group, have interests in the Amalgamation that
are different from, and/or in addition to, the interests of IPC
shareholders generally. As described under The
Amalgamation Interests of IPC Directors and
Executive Officers in the Amalgamation, Messrs. Weale,
Cozens and Fallon have each entered into an employment agreement
with IPC under which they would receive cash severance benefits
in the respective amounts of $1,798,500, $1,476,000 and
$1,466,750 upon experiencing a termination without
Cause (as such term is defined in the employment
agreements), assuming a termination date of October 1, 2009
following the Amalgamation. Additionally, assuming a termination
date of October 1, 2009 following the Amalgamation, the
employment agreements provide that Messrs. Weale, Cozens
and Fallon would be paid retention bonuses in the amounts of
$646,250, $432,000 and $429,000, respectively.
Messrs. Weale, Cozens and Fallon and each of IPCs
other officers and directors have rights to indemnification by
virtue of their positions as officers and/or directors of IPC.
IPCs board of directors was aware of and considered these
differing interests and potential conflicts, among other
matters, in evaluating and negotiating the Amalgamation
Agreement with Validus and in recommending that the IPC
shareholders approve the proposals to be voted upon at the IPC
special meeting.
The rights of IPCs executive officers under the applicable
employment agreements, and the rights of IPCs directors
and officers to indemnification and the maintenance of
directors and officers liability insurance are
described under The Amalgamation Interests of IPC
Directors and Executive Officers in the Amalgamation.
Dividends
and Distributions (page 90)
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash
dividend, i.e., $0.20 per common share in
Validus case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs
case. Validus expects to continue to pay its regular quarterly
dividends consistent with past practice. Under the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement, before the Amalgamation closes, Validus
and IPC would both be permitted to declare and pay ordinary
course quarterly dividends on their common shares with record
and payment dates consistent with past practice; provided
that
4
any such dividend is at a rate no greater than the rate it paid
during the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of the
Amalgamation Agreement, i.e., $0.20 per common share in
Validus case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs case.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment (page 90)
The Amalgamation will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting, with Validus treated as the accounting acquirer,
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(FAS) No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (FAS 141(R)), under which
the total consideration paid in the Amalgamation will be
allocated among acquired tangible and intangible assets and
assumed liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event
there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the
Amalgamation over the fair values, the excess will be accounted
for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting
from the Amalgamation will not be amortized but instead will be
tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if
certain indicators are present). In the event that the
management of Validus determines that the value of goodwill has
become impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the
fiscal quarter in which such determination is made. In the event
there is an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid in the
Amalgamation, the excess will be accounted for as a gain to be
recognized through the income statement at the consummation of
the Amalgamation in accordance with FAS 141(R). Validus
anticipates the Amalgamation will result in an excess of the
fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed over
the total consideration paid in the Amalgamation.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences (page 126)
IPC and Validus intend for the Amalgamation to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, and completion of the Amalgamation is conditioned on
Validus and IPC receiving tax opinions to this effect from
Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp and
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, respectively. Assuming the
Amalgamation so qualifies, a U.S. holder of IPC Shares that
exchanges IPC Shares for Validus Shares and cash in the
Amalgamation will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of cash
received by such U.S. holder in the Amalgamation (excluding
any cash received in lieu of a fractional Validus Share) and
(ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the cash
and the fair market value of the Validus Shares received by such
U.S. holder (including the fair market value of any
fractional Validus Share deemed received), over (b) the
U.S. holders tax basis in the IPC Shares exchanged
pursuant to the Amalgamation. Subject to the passive foreign
investment company rules or the potential application of
Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized upon the
exchange generally will be capital gain, unless the receipt of
cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of the distribution of
a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For more
information, please see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus under the caption Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.
Tax matters are complicated and the tax consequences of the
Amalgamation to you will depend upon the facts of your
particular circumstances. Because individual circumstances may
differ, Validus urges you to consult with your own tax advisor
as to the specific tax consequences of the Amalgamation to you,
including the applicability of U.S. federal, state, local,
non-U.S. and
other tax laws.
The
Amalgamation Agreement (page 94)
The Amalgamation Agreement is attached as Annex A. You
should read the Amalgamation Agreement in its entirety because
it, and not this joint proxy statement/prospectus, is the legal
document that governs the Amalgamation.
Amalgamation
Consideration (page 94)
Under the Amalgamation Agreement, each outstanding IPC Share
(including any shares held by IPC shareholders that do not vote
in favor of the Amalgamation, but excluding any dissenting
shares as to which appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant
to Bermuda law, and excluding any shares held by Validus, IPC
5
or any of their respective subsidiaries) will be cancelled and
converted into the right to receive (i) 0.9727 Validus
Shares, (ii) $7.50 in cash, less any applicable withholding
taxes and without interest, and (iii) cash in lieu of
fractional shares.
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the Amalgamation. Instead, any IPC shareholder
who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
Validus Share in connection with the Amalgamation will be paid
an amount in cash determined by multiplying such fraction by the
average price of Validus Shares (such average price is
determined by valuing Validus Shares based on the volume
weighted average price per Validus Share on the NYSE for the
five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the second
trading day prior to the closing of the Amalgamation).
Restrictions
on Change in Recommendation by the Boards of Directors of IPC or
Validus (page 102)
Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, the boards of directors
of IPC or Validus may not withdraw or modify, in any manner
adverse to the other party, its recommendations in connection
with the Amalgamation except if such board has concluded in good
faith, after consultation with its outside counsel and financial
advisors, that such action is reasonably likely to be required
in order for the directors to comply with their fiduciary duties
under applicable law, and such party has not materially breached
its obligations with respect to changing its recommendation.
Before a party can change its recommendation with respect to the
Amalgamation, it must provide advance written notice of such
change to the other party and give the other party five business
days to agree to alter the terms and conditions of the
Amalgamation Agreement in a manner that removes the need for the
applicable board of directors to change its recommendation in
order to prevent a breach of its fiduciary duties. Additionally,
IPC must comply with certain additional procedures in order for
the board of directors of IPC to change its recommendation as a
result of receiving an Acquisition Proposal (as defined in the
Amalgamation Agreement) from any third party. Even if IPC or
Validus has had a change in recommendation, each will still be
required to submit such matters to its respective
shareholders meeting. See The Amalgamation
Agreement Restrictions on Change in Recommendation
by the Boards of Directors of IPC or Validus and
Restrictions on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by
IPC.
Restrictions
on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC
(page 102)
The Amalgamation Agreement precludes IPC and its subsidiaries
and advisors from, directly or indirectly, initiating,
soliciting, encouraging or facilitating (including by providing
information) any effort or attempt to make or implement any
proposal or offer with respect to an amalgamation,
reorganization, consolidation, business combination or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any
purchase or sale involving 10% or more of its consolidated
assets (including shares of its subsidiaries), or 10% or more of
its total voting power or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries. IPC may withdraw or modify its recommendation as
described under The Amalgamation Agreement
Restrictions on Change in Recommendation by the Boards of
Directors of IPC or Validus. See The Amalgamation
Agreement Restrictions on Solicitation of
Acquisition Proposals by IPC.
Conditions
to the Amalgamation (page 106)
Validus and IPCs respective obligations to complete
the Amalgamation are subject to the fulfillment or waiver (by
both Validus and IPC) of certain conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of the required Validus shareholder approval of the
Share Issuance and the required IPC vote to adopt the
Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
authorization for listing on the NYSE of the Validus Shares to
be issued or reserved for issuance in connection with the
Amalgamation, subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
certain regulatory filings, approvals or exemptions will have
been made or obtained, or will have occurred;
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
a registration statement registering the Validus Shares to be
issued in the Amalgamation will have become effective under the
Securities Act of 1933, and will not be the subject of any stop
order or proceedings seeking a stop order;
|
|
|
|
no injunction or other legal restraints or prohibitions
preventing the consummation of the Amalgamation will be in
effect;
|
|
|
|
subject to the materiality standards provided in the
Amalgamation Agreement, the representations and warranties of
each other party in the Amalgamation Agreement will be true and
correct, and each party will have performed its obligations
under the Amalgamation Agreement (and each party will have
received a certificate from the other party to such effect);
|
|
|
|
no governmental entity will have imposed any law, or any other
action, any term, condition, obligation or restriction that
would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on Validus and its
subsidiaries (including the combined entity) after the effective
time of the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
each of IPC and Validus will have received a tax opinion with
respect to certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the Amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
all amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities,
as reasonably determined by each of IPC and Validus to be
necessary to consummate the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated thereby, shall be in full force and
effect or new credit facilities
and/or
amendments or waivers under any of the parties existing
credit facilities (Replacement Financing)
shall be in full force and effect.
|
At any time prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation, the
parties may, to the extent legally permissible, waive compliance
with any of the conditions contained in the Amalgamation
Agreement, as described under The Amalgamation
Agreement Amendments and Waivers Under the
Amalgamation Agreement.
Termination
of the Amalgamation Agreement (page 107)
The Amalgamation Agreement may be terminated, at any time prior
to the effective time of the Amalgamation, by mutual written
consent of IPC and Validus, and, subject to certain limitations
described in the Amalgamation Agreement, by either IPC or
Validus, if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
a regulatory approval required by the Amalgamation Agreement to
be obtained has been denied or any governmental authority has
taken any action permanently restraining or prohibiting the
Amalgamation, and such denial or action has become final and
nonappealable (unless the failure to complete the Amalgamation
by that date is due to a breach by the party seeking to
terminate the Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the Amalgamation has not been consummated on or prior to
January 31, 2010 (unless the failure to complete the
Amalgamation by that date is due to a breach by the party
seeking to terminate the Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the other partys board of directors has (1) changed
its recommendation to its shareholders, (2) failed to
include such recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, or (3) materially breached certain of
the non-solicitation obligations applicable to it under the
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the other party has breached a covenant, agreement,
representation or warranty that would preclude the satisfaction
of certain closing conditions and such breach is not remedied in
the 45 days following written notice to the breaching party
or is not capable of being so remedied; or
|
|
|
|
the Validus shareholders have not approved the Share Issuance at
the Validus special meeting or the IPC shareholders have not
approved and adopted the Amalgamation Agreement and approved the
amalgamation at the IPC special meeting.
|
7
Effects
of Termination, Remedies (page 107)
If either Validus or IPC terminates the Amalgamation Agreement,
a party may be required to pay the other party a termination fee
of $16 million in certain circumstances, and IPC will be
required to pay Validus an amount equal to $50 million in
respect of the termination fee (the Max Termination
Fee) payable under the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation
among Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max), IPC and IPC
Limited (the Max Amalgamation Agreement), which
amount was advanced by Validus on July 9, 2009, in certain
circumstances, as described under The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Effects of Termination; Remedies and
The Amalgamation Agreement Repayment or Retention
of the Reimbursement Amount.
Voting
Agreements (page 88)
In connection with the Amalgamation Agreement, affiliates of
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, Vestar Capital Partners, and New
Mountain Capital, LLC, which collectively owned approximately
38% of Validus Shares as of July 27, 2009, have agreed to
vote in favor of the issuance of Validus Shares in connection
with the Amalgamation. Each of the voting agreements will
terminate upon the earlier of: (i) the mutual consent of
IPC and a shareholder; (ii) the holding of a duly called
meeting of the shareholders of Validus (or an adjournment or
postponement thereof) relating to the approval of the issuance
of Validus Shares in connection with the Amalgamation at which a
shareholder is present and votes its Validus Shares in favor of
such issuance; and (iii) the date of termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement in accordance with its terms.
8
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF VALIDUS
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to Validus. The financial data has been
derived from Validus Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus (the Validus
10-Q)
and Validus Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus (the
Validus
10-K).
You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any future period. This
financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and the related notes and other financial information
contained in the Validus
10-Q and the
Validus
10-K. More
comprehensive financial information, including
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, is contained in the
Validus 10-Q
and Validus
10-K, and
the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the Validus
10-Q and
Validus 10-K
and all of the financial information and notes contained
therein. Please see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Where You Can Find More
Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
609,892
|
|
|
$
|
521,594
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
988,637
|
|
|
$
|
540,789
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(72,512
|
)
|
|
|
(84,900
|
)
|
|
|
(124,160
|
)
|
|
|
(70,210
|
)
|
|
|
(63,696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
537,380
|
|
|
|
436,694
|
|
|
|
1,238,324
|
|
|
|
918,427
|
|
|
|
477,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
(218,621
|
)
|
|
|
(144,830
|
)
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
(60,348
|
)
|
|
|
(170,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
318,759
|
|
|
|
291,864
|
|
|
|
1,256,518
|
|
|
|
858,079
|
|
|
|
306,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
26,772
|
|
|
|
36,043
|
|
|
|
139,528
|
|
|
|
112,324
|
|
|
|
58,021
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
(23,421
|
)
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Net unrealized gains on investments(2)
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
(14,977
|
)
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
|
|
12,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
8,179
|
|
|
|
(49,397
|
)
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
340,820
|
|
|
|
329,788
|
|
|
|
1,279,367
|
|
|
|
994,372
|
|
|
|
365,590
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
131,834
|
|
|
|
140,024
|
|
|
|
772,154
|
|
|
|
283,993
|
|
|
|
91,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
61,449
|
|
|
|
56,701
|
|
|
|
234,951
|
|
|
|
134,277
|
|
|
|
36,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
38,079
|
|
|
|
37,107
|
|
|
|
123,948
|
|
|
|
100,765
|
|
|
|
38,354
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Share compensation expenses
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
|
|
21,517
|
|
|
|
57,318
|
|
|
|
51,754
|
|
|
|
8,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
49,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
246,439
|
|
|
|
261,884
|
|
|
|
1,215,468
|
|
|
|
589,871
|
|
|
|
182,493
|
|
|
|
51,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before taxes
|
|
|
94,381
|
|
|
|
67,904
|
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
404,501
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
(49,708
|
)
|
Taxes
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
94,907
|
|
|
|
66,475
|
|
|
|
53,111
|
|
|
|
402,996
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
(49,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains arising during the period(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(7,809
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for reclassification of losses realized in income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
94,711
|
|
|
$
|
66,542
|
|
|
$
|
45,302
|
|
|
$
|
402,947
|
|
|
$
|
183,867
|
|
|
$
|
(49,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
75,744,577
|
|
|
|
74,209,371
|
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
65,068,093
|
|
|
|
58,477,130
|
|
|
|
58,423,174
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
79,102,643
|
|
|
|
78,329,727
|
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
67,786,673
|
|
|
|
58,874,567
|
|
|
|
58,423,174
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected financial ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses ratio(4)
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Policy acquisition cost ratio(5)
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense ratio(6)
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio(7)
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio(8)
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
82.4
|
%
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized return on average equity(9)
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet data as
of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and as of December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,926,859
|
|
|
$
|
2,893,595
|
|
|
$
|
2,831,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,662,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,376,387
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
535,798
|
|
|
|
347,347
|
|
|
|
449,848
|
|
|
|
444,698
|
|
|
|
63,643
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,762,798
|
|
|
|
4,535,638
|
|
|
|
4,322,480
|
|
|
|
4,144,224
|
|
|
|
1,646,423
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
1,318,732
|
|
|
|
977,236
|
|
|
|
1,305,303
|
|
|
|
926,117
|
|
|
|
77,363
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
795,233
|
|
|
|
750,257
|
|
|
|
539,450
|
|
|
|
557,344
|
|
|
|
178,824
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable debentures
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,739,812
|
|
|
|
2,544,980
|
|
|
|
2,383,746
|
|
|
|
2,209,424
|
|
|
|
453,900
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
|
1,990,658
|
|
|
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
|
1,934,800
|
|
|
|
1,192,523
|
|
Book value per common share(10)
|
|
|
26.68
|
|
|
|
26.82
|
|
|
|
25.64
|
|
|
|
26.08
|
|
|
|
20.39
|
|
Diluted book value per common share(11)
|
|
|
24.65
|
|
|
|
24.43
|
|
|
|
23.78
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
19.73
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
General and administrative expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 include $4,000,000 and
$1,000,000 respectively, related to Validus advisory
agreement with Aquiline Capital Partners, LLC, which, together
with its related companies, we refer to as Aquiline.
Validus advisory agreement with Aquiline terminated upon
completion of Validus initial public offering, in
connection with which Validus recorded general and
administrative expense of $3,000,000 in the year ended
December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Validus adopted FAS 157 and FAS 159 as of
January 1, 2007 and elected the fair value option on all
securities previously accounted for as available-for-sale.
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments at
December 31, 2006 of $875,000, previously included in
accumulated other comprehensive income, were treated as a
cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2007. The
cumulative-effect adjustment transferred the balance of
unrealized gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive
income to retained earnings and had no impact on the results of
operations for the annual or interim periods beginning
January 1, 2007. Validus investments were accounted
for as trading for the annual or interim periods beginning
January 1, 2007 and as such all unrealized gains and losses
are included in net income. |
|
(3) |
|
FAS 123(R) requires that any unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense that will be recorded in future periods be
included as proceeds for purposes of treasury stock repurchases,
which is applied against the unvested restricted shares balance.
On March 1, 2007 we effected a 1.75 for 1 reverse stock
split of Validus outstanding common shares. The stock
split does not affect Validus financial statements other
than to the extent it decreases the number of outstanding shares
and correspondingly increases per share information for all
periods presented. The share consolidation has been reflected
retroactively in these financial statements. |
|
(4) |
|
The losses and loss expense ratio is calculated by dividing
losses and loss expenses by net premiums earned. |
|
(5) |
|
The policy acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing
policy acquisition costs by net premiums earned. |
|
(6) |
|
The general and administrative expense ratio is calculated by
dividing the sum of general and administrative expenses and
share compensation expenses by net premiums earned. The general
and administrative expense ratio for the year ended
December 31, 2007 is calculated by dividing the total of
general and |
10
|
|
|
|
|
administrative expenses plus share compensation expenses less
the $3,000,000 termination fee payable to Aquiline by net
premiums earned. |
|
(7) |
|
The expense ratio is calculated by combining the policy
acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative
expense ratio. |
|
(8) |
|
The combined ratio is calculated by combining the losses and
loss expense ratio, the policy acquisition cost ratio and the
general and administrative expense ratio. |
|
(9) |
|
Annualized return on average equity is calculated by dividing
the net income for the period by the average shareholders
equity during the period. Annual average shareholders
equity is the average of the beginning, ending and intervening
quarter-end shareholders equity balances. |
|
(10) |
|
Book value per common share is defined as total
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding as at the end of the period, giving no effect to
dilutive securities. |
|
(11) |
|
Diluted book value per common share is calculated based on total
shareholders equity plus the assumed proceeds from the
exercise of outstanding options and warrants, divided by the sum
of common shares, unvested restricted shares, options and
warrants outstanding (assuming their exercise). Diluted book
value per common share is a Non-GAAP financial measure as
described under Item 7, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of
Operations Financial Measures, in the
Validus 10-K. |
11
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF IPC
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to IPC. The financial data has been
derived from IPCs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus (the
IPC 10-Q),
and IPCs Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus (the
IPC
10-K).
You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any future period. This
financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and the related notes and other financial information
contained in the IPC
10-Q and the
IPC 10-K.
More comprehensive financial information, including
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, is contained in the
IPC 10-K and the
IPC 10-Q,
and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such other documents and all of the financial
information and notes contained in those documents. Please see
the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled
Where You Can Find More Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
234,610
|
|
|
$
|
197,875
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
404,096
|
|
|
$
|
429,851
|
|
|
$
|
472,387
|
|
|
$
|
378,409
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
98,708
|
|
|
|
89,697
|
|
|
|
387,367
|
|
|
|
391,385
|
|
|
|
397,132
|
|
|
|
452,522
|
|
|
|
354,882
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
23,874
|
|
|
|
94,105
|
|
|
|
121,842
|
|
|
|
109,659
|
|
|
|
71,757
|
|
|
|
51,220
|
|
Net (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(35,572
|
)
|
|
|
(6,020
|
)
|
|
|
(168,208
|
)
|
|
|
67,555
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
|
|
(10,556
|
)
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
39,109
|
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
155,632
|
|
|
|
124,923
|
|
|
|
58,505
|
|
|
|
1,072,662
|
|
|
|
215,608
|
|
Net acquisition costs
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
|
|
8,674
|
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
|
|
39,856
|
|
|
|
37,542
|
|
|
|
39,249
|
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
24,281
|
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
26,314
|
|
|
|
30,510
|
|
|
|
34,436
|
|
|
|
27,466
|
|
|
|
23,151
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
86,803
|
|
|
$
|
90,447
|
|
|
$
|
385,412
|
|
|
$
|
394,585
|
|
|
$
|
(623,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
138,613
|
|
Preferred dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,234
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
17,128
|
|
|
|
17,176
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
82,569
|
|
|
$
|
75,508
|
|
|
$
|
368,284
|
|
|
$
|
377,409
|
|
|
$
|
(626,063
|
)
|
|
$
|
138,613
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
$
|
5.54
|
|
|
$
|
(12.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
55,916,256
|
|
|
|
66,182,883
|
|
|
|
59,301,939
|
|
|
|
69,728,229
|
|
|
|
71,212,287
|
|
|
|
50,901,296
|
|
|
|
48,376,865
|
|
Cash dividend per common share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio(2)
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
237.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
Expense ratio(2)
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Combined ratio(2)
|
|
|
74.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
251.8
|
%
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
Return on average equity(3)
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and investments
|
|
$
|
2,189,966
|
|
|
$
|
2,475,860
|
|
|
$
|
2,235,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,473,244
|
|
|
$
|
2,485,525
|
|
|
$
|
2,560,146
|
|
|
$
|
1,901,094
|
|
Reinsurance premiums receivable
|
|
|
199,241
|
|
|
|
161,474
|
|
|
|
108,033
|
|
|
|
91,393
|
|
|
|
113,811
|
|
|
|
180,798
|
|
|
|
85,086
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,453,085
|
|
|
|
2,712,037
|
|
|
|
2,388,688
|
|
|
|
2,627,691
|
|
|
|
2,645,429
|
|
|
|
2,778,281
|
|
|
|
2,028,290
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
354,467
|
|
|
|
355,276
|
|
|
|
355,893
|
|
|
|
395,245
|
|
|
|
548,627
|
|
|
|
1,072,056
|
|
|
|
274,463
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
219,641
|
|
|
|
181,889
|
|
|
|
85,473
|
|
|
|
75,980
|
|
|
|
80,043
|
|
|
|
66,311
|
|
|
|
68,465
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
603,611
|
|
|
|
563,904
|
|
|
|
537,741
|
|
|
|
501,946
|
|
|
|
654,474
|
|
|
|
1,161,881
|
|
|
|
359,851
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,849,474
|
|
|
$
|
2,148,133
|
|
|
$
|
1,850,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,125,745
|
|
|
$
|
1,990,955
|
|
|
$
|
1,616,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,668,439
|
|
Diluted book value per common share(4)
|
|
$
|
33.05
|
|
|
$
|
33.26
|
|
|
$
|
32.85
|
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
$
|
27.94
|
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
|
$
|
34.44
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per common share is calculated upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant
year. The weighted average number of shares includes common
shares and the dilutive effect of employee stock options and
stock grants, using the treasury stock method and convertible
preferred shares. The net loss per common share for the year
ended December 31, 2005 is calculated on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding
the anti-dilutive |
12
|
|
|
|
|
effect of employee stock options, stock grants and convertible
preferred shares. The net income per common share for the year
ended December 31, 2008 is calculated on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding
the anti-dilutive effect of stock-based compensation and
convertible preferred shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is calculated by
dividing the net losses and loss expenses incurred by the net
premiums earned. The expense ratio is calculated by dividing the
sum of acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses
by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the
loss and loss expense ratio and the expense ratio. |
|
(3) |
|
Return on average equity is calculated as the annual net income
(loss), available to common shareholders divided by the average
of the common shareholders equity, which is total
shareholders equity, excluding convertible preferred
shares, on the first and last day of the respective year. |
|
(4) |
|
Diluted book value per common share is calculated as
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding on the balance sheet date, after considering the
dilutive effects of stock-based compensation, calculated using
the treasury stock method. At December 31, 2008 the average
weighted number of shares outstanding, including the dilutive
effect of employee stock-based compensation and convertible
preferred shares (which were converted on November 15,
2008) using the treasury stock method was 59,301,939. |
13
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial statements are based on the historical financial
statements of Validus and IPC and are intended to provide you
with information about how the Amalgamation might have affected
the historical financial statements of Validus if it had been
consummated at an earlier time. The following unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial information does not
necessarily reflect the financial position or results of
operations that would have actually resulted had the
Amalgamation occurred as of the dates indicated, nor should they
be taken as necessarily indicative of the future financial
position or results of operations of Validus.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Validus
10-Q, the
Validus
10-K, the
IPC 10-Q and
the IPC
10-K, each
as filed with the SEC. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma financial information gives effect to the Amalgamation as
if it had occurred at March 31, 2009 for the purposes of
the unaudited consolidated pro forma balance sheet and at
January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009. For a summary of the proposed business
combination contemplated by the Amalgamation, see the section of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus set forth under The
Amalgamation.
14
The following table presents unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma balance sheet data at March 31, 2009 (expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data) giving effect to the Amalgamation as if it had occurred at
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,644,496
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,805
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,417,301
|
|
Short-term investments, at fair value
|
|
|
282,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,363
|
|
Equity investments, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,091
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
535,798
|
|
|
|
122,070
|
|
|
|
(527,109
|
)
|
|
3(a) 3(b), 4
|
|
|
130,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and cash
|
|
|
3,462,657
|
|
|
|
2,189,966
|
|
|
|
(527,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
5,125,514
|
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
600,943
|
|
|
|
199,241
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
800,024
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
143,510
|
|
|
|
23,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,812
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
59,510
|
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
62,896
|
|
Securities lending collateral
|
|
|
99,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,727
|
|
Loss reserves recoverable
|
|
|
204,197
|
|
|
|
4,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,471
|
|
Paid losses recoverable
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
|
|
27,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,418
|
|
Current taxes recoverable
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
126,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,177
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,491
|
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,762,798
|
|
|
$
|
2,453,085
|
|
|
$
|
(527,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,688,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
$
|
795,233
|
|
|
$
|
219,641
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
$
|
1,014,675
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expense
|
|
|
1,318,732
|
|
|
|
354,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673,199
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
66,180
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
70,503
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
20,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,914
|
|
Securities lending payable
|
|
|
105,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,369
|
|
Net payable for investments purchased
|
|
|
57,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,434
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
71,650
|
|
|
|
25,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,670
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,739,812
|
|
|
|
603,611
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
3,343,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
13,271
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
9,057
|
|
|
3(a) 3(c) 3(d)
|
|
|
22,889
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,419,602
|
|
|
|
1,091,491
|
|
|
|
87,119
|
|
|
3(a) 3(c) 3(d)
|
|
|
2,598,212
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(8,054
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
3(d)
|
|
|
(8,054
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
598,167
|
|
|
|
758,298
|
|
|
|
(624,161
|
)
|
|
3(b) 3(d) 3(f)
|
|
|
732,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
|
1,849,474
|
|
|
|
(527,109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
3,345,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,762,798
|
|
|
$
|
2,453,085
|
|
|
$
|
(527,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,688,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
75,828,922
|
|
|
|
55,948,821
|
|
|
|
54,425,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,254,290
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
90,317,793
|
|
|
|
57,008,096
|
|
|
|
55,455,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,773,517
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
26.68
|
|
|
$
|
33.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
$
|
25.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per share
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
32.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
23.03
|
|
|
$
|
32.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma results of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (expressed in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) giving
effect to the Amalgamation as if it had occurred at
January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
3(e), 5
|
|
$
|
1,765,628
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(124,160
|
)
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
(130,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
1,238,324
|
|
|
|
397,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635,597
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
(9,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
1,256,518
|
|
|
|
387,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,643,885
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
139,528
|
|
|
|
94,105
|
|
|
|
(20,203
|
)
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
213,430
|
|
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
49,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,699
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
|
|
(217,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297,205
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(49,397
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,279,367
|
|
|
|
311,481
|
|
|
|
(20,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1,570,645
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense
|
|
|
772,154
|
|
|
|
155,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
927,786
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
234,951
|
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,380
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
123,948
|
|
|
|
20,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,637
|
|
Share compensation expense
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,722
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
57,318
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,215,468
|
|
|
|
221,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,436,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
90,447
|
|
|
|
(20,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
134,143
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes
|
|
$
|
53,111
|
|
|
$
|
90,447
|
|
|
$
|
(20,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
123,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
(14,939
|
)
|
|
3(g)
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
46,164
|
|
|
$
|
75,508
|
|
|
$
|
(5,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
116,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
52,124,034
|
|
|
|
54,426,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,104,189
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
59,301,939
|
|
|
|
54,960,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,779,979
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 (expressed in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) giving
effect to the Amalgamation as if it had occurred at
January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
609,892
|
|
|
$
|
234,610
|
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
3(e), 5
|
|
$
|
844,237
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(72,512
|
)
|
|
|
(3,154
|
)
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
(75,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
537,380
|
|
|
|
231,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768,836
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
(218,621
|
)
|
|
|
(132,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
318,759
|
|
|
|
98,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,467
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
26,772
|
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
(4,191
|
)
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
44,447
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(23,421
|
)
|
|
|
(35,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,993
|
)
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
340,820
|
|
|
|
81,863
|
|
|
|
(4,191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
418,492
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense
|
|
|
131,834
|
|
|
|
39,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
170,943
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
61,449
|
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,287
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
38,079
|
|
|
|
21,792
|
|
|
|
(11,638
|
)
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
48,233
|
|
Share compensation expense
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
246,439
|
|
|
|
73,611
|
|
|
|
(11,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
308,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
94,381
|
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,080
|
|
Income tax credit
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes
|
|
$
|
94,907
|
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
93,171
|
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
75,744,577
|
|
|
|
55,903,740
|
|
|
|
54,425,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,169,945
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
79,102,643
|
|
|
|
55,916,256
|
|
|
|
54,959,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,062,290
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information gives effect to the Amalgamation as if it had
occurred at March 31, 2009 for the purposes of the
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet and at
January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and three months ended
March 31, 2009. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma financial information has been prepared by Validus
management, after discussion with IPCs management, and is
based on Validus historical consolidated financial
statements and IPCs historical consolidated financial
statements. Certain amounts from IPCs historical
consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the Validus presentation.
This unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information is prepared in conformity with US GAAP. The
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet as of
March 31, 2009 and the unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31,
2009 have been prepared using the following information:
(a) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of
Validus as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008;
(b) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of
IPC as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008;
(c) Unaudited historical consolidated financial statements
of Validus as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2009;
(d) Unaudited historical consolidated financial statements
of IPC as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2009; and
(e) Such other known supplementary information as
considered necessary to reflect the Amalgamation in the
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information.
The pro forma adjustments reflecting the Amalgamation under the
purchase method of accounting are based on certain estimates and
assumptions. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
adjustments may be revised as additional information becomes
available. The actual adjustments upon consummation of the
Amalgamation and the allocation of the final purchase price of
IPC will depend on a number of factors, including additional
financial information available at such time, changes in values
and changes in IPCs operating results between the date of
preparation of this unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information and the effective date of the
Amalgamation. Therefore, it is likely that the actual
adjustments will differ from the pro forma adjustments and it is
possible the differences may be material. Validus
management believes that its assumptions provide a reasonable
basis for presenting all of the significant effects of the
transactions contemplated based on information available to
Validus at the time and that the pro forma adjustments give
appropriate effect to those assumptions and are properly applied
in the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information does not include any financial benefits, revenue
enhancements or operating expense efficiencies arising from the
Amalgamation. In addition, the unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma financial information does not include any additional
expenses that may result from the Amalgamation. Estimated costs
of the transaction as well as the benefit of the negative
goodwill have been reflected in the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma balance sheets, but have not been
included on the pro forma income statement due to their
non-recurring nature.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information is not intended to reflect the results of operations
or the financial position that would have resulted had the
Amalgamation been effected on
18
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
the dates indicated and if the companies had been managed as one
entity. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Validus
10-Q, the
Validus
10-K, the
IPC 10-Q and
the IPC
10-K, as
filed with the SEC. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
|
|
2.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
and No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51
(FAS 160) which are effective for business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. On April 1, 2009 the FASB
finalized and issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1 which amended and
clarified FAS 141 (R) and is effective for business
combinations whose acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 has amended FAS 141(R)s
guidance on the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise
from contingencies.
Significant changes arising from FAS 141 (R) and FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 which will impact any future acquisitions
include the determination of the purchase price and treatment of
transaction expenses, restructuring charges and negative
goodwill as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Under FAS 141(R), the purchase
price is determined as of the acquisition date, which is the
date that the acquirer obtains control. Previously, the date the
business combination was announced was used as the effective
date in determining the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
Transactions Expenses Under FAS 141(R), all
costs associated with purchase transactions must be expensed as
incurred. Previously, all such costs could be capitalized and
included as part of transaction purchase price, adding to the
amount of goodwill recognized;
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Costs Under FAS 141(R), expected
restructuring costs are not recorded at the closing date, but
rather after the transaction. The only costs to be included as a
liability at the closing date are those for which an acquirer is
obligated at the time of the closing. Previously, restructuring
costs that were planned to occur after the closing of the
transaction were recognized and recorded at the closing date as
a liability;
|
|
|
|
Negative Goodwill/Bargain Purchases Under
FAS 141(R), where total fair value of net assets acquired
exceeds consideration paid (creating negative
goodwill), the acquirer will record a gain as a result of
the bargain purchase, to be recognized through the income
statement at the close of the transaction. Previously, negative
goodwill was recognized as a pro rata reduction of the assets
assumed to allow the net assets acquired to equal the
consideration paid; and
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests Under FAS 141(R), in a
partial or step acquisition where control is obtained, 100% of
goodwill and identifiable net assets are recognized at fair
value and the noncontrolling (sometimes called minority
interest) interest is also recorded at fair value. Previously,
in a partial acquisition only the controlling interests
share of goodwill was recognized, the controlling
interests share of identifiable net assets was recognized
at fair value and the noncontrolling interests share of
identifiable net assets was recognized at carrying value. Under
FAS 160, a noncontrolling interest is now recognized in the
equity section, presented separately from the controlling
interests equity. Previously, noncontrolling interest in
general was recorded in the mezzanine section.
|
19
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
On July 9, 2009, Validus and IPC signed an agreement
providing for the amalgamation of Validus and IPC. Pursuant to
the amalgamation, IPC shareholders will receive $7.50 in cash
and 0.9727 Validus Shares for each IPC Share.
In connection with the Amalgamation, transaction costs currently
estimated at $64,981 will be incurred and expensed. Of this
amount, $24,830 relates to Validus expenses and
$40,151 relates to IPC expenses as set forth in The
Amalgamation Sources of Funds, Fees and
Expenses. In addition, in connection with the Amalgamation,
the Max Termination Fee has been incurred and expensed.
Approximately $11,638 of the estimated $64,981 total transaction
costs have been incurred and expensed by IPC in the three months
ended March 31, 2009.
As discussed above, these pro forma purchase adjustments are
based on certain estimates and assumptions made as of the date
of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information. The actual adjustments will depend on a number of
factors, including changes in the estimated fair value of net
balance sheet assets and operating results of IPC between
March 31, 2009 and the effective date of the Amalgamation.
Validus expects to make such adjustments at the effective date
of the Amalgamation. These adjustments are likely to be
different from the adjustments made to prepare the unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial information and such
differences may be material.
The share prices for both Validus and IPC used in determining
the preliminary estimated purchase price are based on the
closing share prices on July 14, 2009. The preliminary
total purchase price is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Total Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
IPC Shares outstanding as of May 8, 2009
|
|
|
55,948,821
|
|
IPC Shares issued pursuant to option exercises
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
IPC Shares issued following vesting of restricted shares, RSUs
and PSUs
|
|
|
549,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IPC Shares and share equivalents prior to transaction
|
|
|
56,502,157
|
|
Exchange ratio
|
|
|
0.9727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Validus Shares to be issued
|
|
|
54,959,648
|
|
Validus closing share price on July 14, 2009
|
|
$
|
21.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total value of Validus Shares to be issued
|
|
$
|
1,188,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash consideration paid at $7.50 per IPC share
|
|
$
|
423,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
1,611,994
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
IPC shareholders equity(b)
|
|
$
|
1,849,474
|
|
Total purchase price(a)
|
|
$
|
1,611,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative goodwill (a − b)
|
|
$
|
237,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In connection with the Amalgamation, 54,959,648 shares are
expected to be issued in exchange for all of IPCs common
shares, common shares issued pursuant to option exercises, and
common shares issued following vesting of restricted shares,
restricted share units and performance share units resulting in
additional share capital of $9,618 and Additional Paid-In
Capital of $1,178,610. In addition, cash consideration of $7.50
per IPC share, or $423,766 in total, is expected to be paid to
IPC shareholders. |
20
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
It is expected that total transaction costs currently estimated
at $64,981 and the Max Termination Fee of $50,000 will be
incurred and expensed by the consolidated entity. Based on an
expected investment return of 3.75% per annum, investment
income of $20,203 would have been foregone during the year end
December 31, 2008 had these payments of $538,754 been made. |
|
|
|
Approximately $11,638 of the estimated $64,981 total transaction
costs have been incurred and expensed by IPC in the three months
ended March 31, 2009. These expenses have been eliminated
from the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. In
addition, an adjustment of $103,343 was recorded to cash and to
retained earnings as at March 31, 2009 to reflect the
remaining transaction costs and Max Termination Fee. Based on an
expected investment return of 3.18% per annum, investment
income of $4,191 would have been foregone during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 had these remaining payments of
$527,109 been made. |
|
(c) |
|
Employees of IPC hold 522,000 options to purchase IPC
Shares. These options would vest upon a change in control, and
would be exercisable. The exercise price range of these options
is from $13 to $49, with a weighted average of $34.40. It is
expected that 4,061 net shares would be issued upon
exercise of these options. |
|
(d) |
|
Elimination of IPCs Ordinary Shares of $561, Additional
Paid in Capital of $1,091,491, Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss of $876 and Retained Earnings of $758,298. |
|
(e) |
|
A related party balance of $265 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and $251 for the year ended
December 31, 2008 representing reinsurance ceded to IPC by
Validus was eliminated from gross premiums written and
reinsurance ceded. Corresponding prepaid reinsurance premiums
and unearned premiums of $199 and premiums receivable and
reinsurance balances payable of $160 have been eliminated from
the pro forma balance sheet. |
|
(f) |
|
The carrying value of assets and liabilities in IPCs
financial statements are considered to be a proxy for fair value
of those assets and liabilities, with the difference between the
net assets and the total purchase price considered to be
negative goodwill. In December 2007, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(FAS 141(R)) This Statement defines a bargain
purchase as a business combination in which the total
acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred
plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it
requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in earnings as a
gain attributable to the acquirer. Negative goodwill of $237,480
has been recorded as a credit to retained earnings as upon
completion of the Amalgamation negative goodwill will be treated
as a gain in the consolidated statement of operations. |
|
(g) |
|
On November 15, 2008, IPCs 9,000,000 Series A
Mandatory Convertible preferred shares automatically converted
pursuant to their terms into 9,129,600 common shares. Therefore,
dividends of $14,939 on these preferred shares of IPC have been
eliminated from the unaudited pro forma results of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
The share prices of both Validus and IPC used in preparing these
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements
are based on the closing share prices on July 14, 2009, and
were $21.62 and $27.49, respectively. As of August 4, 2009,
the share prices were $23.61 and $29.98, respectively. The
effect of using the August 4, 2009 closing share price in
preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial statements would have resulted in entries to
additional paid in capital of $109,694 and to cash of $106
reflecting additional purchase price, and an offsetting entry to
retained earnings of $109,800 reflecting reduced negative
goodwill. Using August 4, 2009 share prices would have
had no material effect on calculation of book value per share,
diluted book value per share, basic earnings per share and
diluted earnings per share. |
21
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
4.
|
Adjustments
to cash and cash equivalents
|
The Amalgamation will result in the payment of cash and cash
equivalents by IPC of $78,513 and by Validus of $448,596.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statements of
operations reflect the impact of these reductions in cash and
cash equivalents. Actual transaction costs may vary from such
estimates which are based on the best information available at
the time the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information was prepared.
For purposes of presentation in the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information, the sources and
uses of funds of the Amalgamation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of funds
|
IPC cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
78,513
|
|
Validus cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
448,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
527,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses of funds
|
Cash consideration for IPC shares
|
|
$
|
423,766
|
|
IPC transaction costs
|
|
|
28,513
|
|
Validus transaction costs
|
|
|
24,830
|
|
Max Termination Fee
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
527,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
5.
|
Gross
Premiums Written
|
The following table sets forth the gross premiums written for
the year ended December 31, 2008 by Validus, IPC and pro
forma combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC(a)
|
|
|
Purchase Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Validus Re
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Cat XOL(b)
|
|
$
|
328,216
|
|
|
$
|
333,749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
661,965
|
|
Property Per Risk XOL
|
|
|
54,056
|
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,722
|
|
Property Proportional(c)
|
|
|
110,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,695
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
117,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,744
|
|
Aerospace
|
|
|
39,323
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
57,297
|
|
Life and A&H
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,318
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
8,218
|
|
Terrorism
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
Workers Comp
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Validus Re Segment
|
|
|
687,771
|
|
|
|
370,858
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
1,058,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talbot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
152,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,143
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
287,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,694
|
|
Aviation & Other
|
|
|
40,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,028
|
|
Accident & Health
|
|
|
18,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,314
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
42,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,263
|
|
War
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
Contingency
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
Bloodstock
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Talbot Segment
|
|
|
708,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
(21,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,724
|
)
|
Marine
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
Specialty
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intersegment Revenue Eliminated
|
|
|
(34,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for reinstatement premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,765,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
The following table sets forth the gross premiums written for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 by Validus, IPC and
pro forma combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC(a)
|
|
|
Purchase Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Validus Re
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Cat XOL(b)
|
|
$
|
185,922
|
|
|
$
|
198,948
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
384,870
|
|
Property Per Risk XOL
|
|
|
15,698
|
|
|
|
8,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,848
|
|
Property Proportional(c)
|
|
|
43,751
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,751
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
121,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,548
|
|
Aerospace
|
|
|
14,033
|
|
|
|
9,351
|
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
23,228
|
|
Life and A&H
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,594
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
14,485
|
|
Terrorism
|
|
|
21,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,974
|
|
Workers Comp
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Validus Re Segment
|
|
|
410,126
|
|
|
|
231,043
|
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
640,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talbot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
60,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,726
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
92,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,410
|
|
Aviation & Other
|
|
|
12,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,933
|
|
Accident & Health
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
9,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,098
|
|
War
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
Contingency
|
|
|
5,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,915
|
|
Bloodstock
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Talbot Segment
|
|
|
227,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
(13,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,108
|
)
|
Marine
|
|
|
(7,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,858
|
)
|
Specialty
|
|
|
(7,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intersegment Revenue Eliminated
|
|
|
(28,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for reinstatement premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
609,892
|
|
|
$
|
234,610
|
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
$
|
844,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For IPC, this includes annual (deposit) and adjustment premiums.
Excludes reinstatement premiums of $32,537 for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and $3,567 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 which are not classified by class of
business by IPC. |
24
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
For Validus, Cat XOL is comprised of Catastrophe XOL, Aggregate
XOL, RPP, Per Event XOL, Second Event and Third Event covers.
For IPC, this includes Catastrophe XOL and Retrocessional. |
|
(c) |
|
Proportional is comprised of Quota Share and Surplus Share. |
Selected ratios of Validus, IPC and pro forma combined are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense ratios
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
Policy acquisition costs ratios
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
General and administrative cost ratios
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
83.7
|
%
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
74.2
|
%
|
|
|
71.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Factors affecting the losses and loss expense ratio for the year
ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Validus losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 was 61.5%. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, the frequency and severity of
worldwide losses that materially affected Validus losses
and loss expense ratio increased. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, Validus incurred $260,567 and $22,141 of
loss expense attributable to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, which
represent 20.7 and 1.8 percentage points of the losses and
loss expense ratio, respectively. Other notable loss events
added $45,895 of 2008 loss expense or 3.7 percentage points
of the losses and loss expense ratio bringing the total effect
of aforementioned events on the 2008 losses and loss expense
ratio to 26.2 percentage points. Favorable loss development
on prior years totaled $69,702. Favorable loss reserve
development benefited Validus losses and loss expense
ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 by
5.5 percentage points. |
|
|
|
IPCs losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 was 40.2%. IPC incurred net
losses and loss adjustment expenses of $155,632 for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Total net losses for the year
ended December 31, 2008 relating to the current year were
$206,578, while reductions to estimates of ultimate net loss for
prior year events were $50,946. During 2008, IPCs incurred
losses included: $23,012 from the Alon Refinery explosion in
Texas, a storm that affected Queensland, Australia, and
Windstorm Emma that affected parts of Europe, which all occurred
in the first quarter of 2008; $10,500 from the flooding in Iowa
in June and tornadoes that affected the mid-west United States
in May 2008; together with $160,000 from Hurricane Ike and
$7,600 from Hurricane Gustav, which both occurred in September
2008. The impact on IPCs 2008 losses and loss expense
ratio from these events was 51.9 percentage points. The
losses from these events were partly offset by reductions to
IPCs estimates of ultimate loss for a number of prior year
events, including $11,000 for Hurricane Katrina, $18,609 for the
storm and flooding that affected New South Wales, Australia in
2007 and $22,871 for the floods that affected parts of the U.K.
in June and July 2007. The cumulative $52,480 of favorable loss
reserve development benefited the IPCs losses and loss
expense ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 by
13.5 percentage points. |
|
(b) |
|
Factors affecting the losses and loss expense ratio for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Validus losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, was 41.4%. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, Validus incurred $6,889
and $6,625 of loss expense attributable to Windstorm Klaus and |
25
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Australian wildfires, respectively, which represent 2.2 and
2.1 percentage points of the losses and loss expense ratio,
respectively. Favorable loss development on prior years totaled
$8,079. Favorable loss reserve development benefited
Validus losses and loss expense ratio for the months ended
March 31, 2009 by 2.5 percentage points. |
|
|
|
IPCs losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, was 39.6%. In the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, IPC incurred net losses and
loss adjustment expenses of $39,109, compared to $5,324 in the
first quarter of 2008. Net losses incurred in the first quarter
of 2009 included $15,000 from Winter Storm Klaus that affected
southern France and $13,326 from the bushfires in south eastern
Australia, as well as net adverse development to their estimates
of ultimate losses for several prior year events. The impact on
IPCs losses and loss expense ratio from these events was
28.7 percentage points. |
|
|
7.
|
Earnings
per Common Share
|
(a) Pro forma earnings per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31,
2009 have been calculated based on the estimated weighted
average number of common shares outstanding on a pro forma
basis, as described in 7(b) below. The historical weighted
average number of common shares outstanding of Validus was
74,677,903 and 75,819,413 basic and diluted, respectively, for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and 75,744,577 and
79,102,643 basic and diluted, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2009.
(b) The pro forma weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2008 and three
months ended March 31, 2009, after giving effect to the
exchange of shares as if the shares issued pursuant to the
Amalgamation had been issued and outstanding for the whole year,
is 129,104,189 and 130,779,979, basic and diluted, and
130,169,945 and 134,062,290, basic and diluted, respectively.
(c) In the basic earnings per share calculation, dividends
and distributions declared on warrants are deducted from net
income. In calculating diluted earnings per share, we consider
the application of the treasury stock method and the two-class
method and which ever is more dilutive is included into the
calculation of diluted earnings per share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
94,907
|
|
|
$
|
110,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
75,744,577
|
|
|
|
130,169,945
|
|
Share Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
2,307,094
|
|
|
|
2,307,094
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
|
|
683,468
|
|
|
|
1,217,747
|
|
Options
|
|
|
367,504
|
|
|
|
367,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
79,102,643
|
|
|
|
134,062,290
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
46,164
|
|
|
$
|
116,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
129,104,189
|
|
Share equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
|
|
1,004,809
|
|
|
|
1,539,089
|
|
Options
|
|
|
136,701
|
|
|
|
136,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
130,779,979
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus calculates diluted book value per share using the
as-if-converted method, where all proceeds received
upon exercise of warrants and stock options would be retained by
Validus and the resulting common shares from exercise remain
outstanding. In its public records, IPC calculates diluted book
value per share using the treasury stock method,
where proceeds received upon exercise of warrants and stock
options would be used by IPC to repurchase shares from the
market, with the net common shares from exercise remaining
outstanding. Accordingly, for the purposes of the Pro Forma
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto,
IPCs diluted book value per share has been recalculated
based on the as-if-converted method to be consistent
with Validus calculation.
27
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per
share data)
The following table sets forth the computation of book value and
diluted book value per share adjusted for the Amalgamation as of
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Book value per common share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,345,351
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
75,828,922
|
|
|
|
130,254,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
26.68
|
|
|
$
|
25.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per common share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,345,351
|
|
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding warrants
|
|
$
|
152,316
|
|
|
$
|
152,316
|
|
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding stock options
|
|
$
|
50,969
|
|
|
$
|
68,709
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,226,271
|
|
|
$
|
3,566,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
75,828,922
|
|
|
|
130,254,290
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
8,680,149
|
|
|
|
8,680,149
|
|
Options
|
|
|
2,795,868
|
|
|
|
3,291,945
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
3,012,854
|
|
|
|
3,547,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,317,793
|
|
|
|
145,773,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per common share
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
24.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the computation of debt to total
capitalization and debt (excluding debentures payable) to total
capitalization at March 31, 2009, adjusted for the
Amalgamation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
304,300
|
|
|
$
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,345,351
|
|
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
2,327,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,649,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capitalization
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Debt (excluding debentures payable) to total capitalization
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
28
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The pro forma combined data is taken from the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information above.
The historical earnings per share, dividends, and book value of
Validus and IPC shown in the table below are derived from their
respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the unaudited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited pro forma comparative
basic and diluted earnings per share data give effect to the
Amalgamation using the purchase method of accounting as if the
Amalgamation had been completed on January 1, 2008. The
unaudited pro forma book value and diluted book value per share
information was computed as if the Amalgamation had been
completed on December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009. You
should read this information in conjunction with the historical
financial information of Validus and of IPC included or
incorporated elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
including Validus and IPCs financial statements and
related notes. The unaudited pro forma data is not necessarily
indicative of actual results had the Amalgamation occurred
during the periods indicated. The unaudited pro forma data is
not necessarily indicative of future operations of Validus.
This pro forma information is subject to risks and
uncertainties, including those discussed in Risk Factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data at or for the
|
|
|
year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
Historical
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Equivalent Per
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
combined
|
|
IPC Share(1)
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
Book value per common
share
|
|
$
|
25.64
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
$
|
24.32
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data at or for the
|
|
|
three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
Historical
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Equivalent Per
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
combined
|
|
IPC Share(1)
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
Book value per common share (at period end)
|
|
$
|
26.68
|
|
|
$
|
33.06
|
|
|
$
|
25.68
|
|
|
$
|
24.98
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equivalent per share amounts are calculated by multiplying
Validus pro forma per share amounts by the Amalgamation exchange
ratio of 0.9727. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of calculating equivalent per IPC Share values for
book value per common share, the equivalent per share amounts do
not include the $7.50 per IPC Share cash consideration. |
29
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Validus Shares and IPC Shares are quoted on the NYSE and NASDAQ,
respectively, under the ticker symbols VR and
IPCR, respectively. The following table sets forth
the high and low closing prices per share of Validus Shares and
IPC Shares for the periods indicated (commencing, in the case of
Validus, from Validus initial public offering on
July 25, 2007) as reported on the consolidated tape of
the NYSE or NASDAQ Global Select Market, as applicable, as well
as cash dividends per common share, as reported in the Validus
10-K and the
IPC 10-K,
respectively, with respect to the years 2007 and 2008, and
thereafter as reported in publicly available sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.30
|
|
|
$
|
21.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
30.25
|
|
|
$
|
20.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.55
|
|
|
$
|
20.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
28.14
|
|
|
$
|
24.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Third Quarter (through August 4, 2009)
|
|
$
|
23.61
|
|
|
$
|
21.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.20(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
29.98
|
|
|
$
|
27.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.22(1
|
)
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.22
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
28.25
|
|
|
$
|
24.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.72
|
|
|
$
|
20.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
30.38
|
|
|
$
|
26.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.70
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
26.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.16
|
|
|
$
|
14.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
29.90
|
|
|
$
|
19.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
31.53
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
32.53
|
|
|
$
|
28.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.28
|
|
|
$
|
21.11
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
33.01
|
|
|
$
|
24.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.59
|
|
|
$
|
24.73
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
30.13
|
|
|
$
|
26.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On July 28, 2009, Validus board of directors declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.20 per Validus Share and $0.20 per
common share equivalent for which each outstanding warrant is
then exercisable. The dividend is payable on September 30, 2009
to shareholders and warrant holders of record on August 20,
2009. On July 23, 2009, IPCs board of directors declared
a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per IPC share, payable on
September 2, 2009 to shareholders of record on August 20, 2009. |
The following table sets out the trading information for Validus
Shares and IPC Shares on March 30, 2009, the last full
trading day before Validus public announcement of delivery
of its initial offer to the board of directors of IPC,
July 8, 2009, the last trading day immediately preceding
the public announcement of the proposed Amalgamation, and
August 4, 2009, the last practicable trading day prior to
the filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
Validus Common
|
|
|
IPC Common
|
|
|
Per-Share
|
|
|
|
Share Close
|
|
|
Share Close
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
March 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
24.91
|
|
|
$
|
25.41
|
|
|
$
|
24.23
|
|
July 8, 2009
|
|
$
|
22.60
|
|
|
$
|
27.61
|
|
|
$
|
21.98
|
|
August 4, 2009
|
|
$
|
23.61
|
|
|
$
|
29.98
|
|
|
$
|
22.97
|
|
Equivalent per-share amounts are calculated by multiplying
Validus per-share amounts by the Amalgamation exchange ratio of
0.9727, but do not include the $7.50 per IPC Share cash
consideration.
The value of the Amalgamation will change as the market
prices of Validus Shares and IPC Shares fluctuate prior to the
consummation of the Amalgamation, and may therefore be different
from the prices set forth above and at the time you receive the
amalgamation consideration. See Risk Factors. IPC
shareholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations
for Validus Shares and IPC Shares.
30
Please also see The Amalgamation Agreement NYSE
Listing and NASDAQ Delisting; Reservation for Issuance for a
discussion regarding the delisting of IPC Shares from the NASDAQ
Global Select Market and the Bermuda Stock Exchange after the
effective time of the Amalgamation.
As of July 27, 2009, directors and executive officers of
Validus (exclusive of those shareholders who Validus deems to be
qualified sponsors (as defined in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus)) held and were entitled to vote
approximately 1.92% of the outstanding Validus Shares. As of
July 27, 2009, directors and executive officers of IPC held
and were entitled to vote approximately 0.8% of the outstanding
IPC Shares.
RATIO OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges and ratio of earnings to
fixed charges excluding Funds at Lloyds costs (FAL
Costs) are measures of Validus ability to cover
fixed costs with current period earnings. For purposes of
computing the following ratios, earnings consist of net income
before income tax expense plus fixed charges to the extent that
such charges are included in the determination of earnings.
Fixed charges consist of interest, amortization of debt issuance
costs and credit facility fees and an imputed interest portion
on operating leases. The following table is derived from
unaudited results for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and audited results for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, 2006 and the period from October 19, 2005, the date
of Validus incorporation, to December 31, 2005. In
addition, the table presents the pro forma combined ratio of
earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Combined(1)
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005(2)
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Excluding
FAL Costs(3)
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Pro Forma Combined reflects the Amalgamation and related
adjustments using the pro forma financial information presented
pursuant to Article 11 of
Regulation S-X.
For a discussion of the assumptions and adjustments made in
preparation of the pro forma financial information presented in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information. |
|
(2) |
|
Validus commenced underwriting activities on January 1,
2006. There were no earnings from underwriting activities during
the period ended December 31, 2005. |
|
(3) |
|
FAL Costs represent both fixed and variable costs paid for
financing Validus operations at Lloyds. The ratio of
earnings to fixed charges excluding FAL Costs demonstrates the
degree to which the ratio changes if FAL Costs are treated as
variable rather than fixed costs. |
31
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
Validus Unaudited
Second Quarter Earnings
On July 29, 2009, Validus announced its financial results
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009. Net income for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 was
$137.6 million compared to net income of $75.9 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008, an increase of
$61.6 million or 81.2%. The primary factors driving the
increase in net income were:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains on investments of
$80.2 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased foreign exchange gains of $7.5 million due to
strengthening of British pounds sterling in comparison to the
U.S. dollar;
|
The items above were partially offset by the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction expenses of $15.9 million in relation to the
acquisition and Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net investment income of $9.5 million due to
increased balances of cash and cash equivalents and lower
returns on cash and fixed income investments; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on repurchase of debentures of $8.8 million realized
during the three months ended June 30, 2008. No such gain
was realized during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
|
On July 28, 2009, Validus board of directors declared
a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per Validus Share and $0.20 per
common share equivalent for which each outstanding warrant is
then exercisable. The dividend is payable on September 30,
2009 to shareholders and warrant holders of record on
August 20, 2009.
IPC Unaudited
Second Quarter Earnings
On July 23, 2009, IPC announced net income for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, of $173.9 million, or $3.11 per
diluted IPC Share, compared to $47.4 million, or $0.78 per
diluted IPC Share, for the second quarter of 2008. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, IPC reported net income of
$182.1 million, or $3.25 per diluted IPC Share, compared to
$134.3 million, or $2.12 per diluted IPC Share, for the
first six months of 2008. IPCs first half earnings were
impacted by, among other things, improvements in pricing, a
general absence of significant catastrophe events, and an
improvement in the equity and debt markets.
On July 23, 2009, IPCs board of directors declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.22 per IPC share, payable on
September 2, 2009 to shareholders of record on
August 20, 2009.
32
THE
COMPANIES
Validus
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company, with its principal
executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is
(441) 278-9000.
Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting
its operations worldwide through two wholly owned subsidiaries,
Validus Re and Talbot. Validus Re is a Bermuda-based reinsurer
focused on short-tail lines of reinsurance. Talbot is the
Bermuda parent of the specialty insurance group primarily
operating within the Lloyds insurance market through
Syndicate 1183. At March 31, 2009, Validus had total
shareholders equity of $2.023 billion and total
assets of $4.763 billion. Validus Shares are traded on the
NYSE under the symbol VR and, as of August 4,
2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, Validus had a market
capitalization of approximately $1.797 billion. Validus has
approximately 280 employees.
As of the date of the filing of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus with the SEC, Validus was the registered
holder of 100 IPC Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC
Shares.
IPC
IPC provides property catastrophe reinsurance and, to a limited
extent,
property-per-risk
excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93%
of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property
catastrophe reinsurance covers against unpredictable events such
as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods
and other man-made or natural disasters. The substantial
majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe, IPCs
Bermuda-based catastrophe reinsurance subsidiary, has been, and
continues to be, written on an excess of loss basis for primary
insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject to aggregate
limits on exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had approximately
258 clients from whom it received either annual/deposit or
adjustment premiums, including many of the leading insurance
companies around the world. In 2008, approximately 36% of those
clients were based in the United States, and approximately 53%
of gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
related primarily to U.S. risks. IPCs
non-U.S. clients
and its
non-U.S. covered
risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and
New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for
more than 3.7% of its gross premiums written, excluding
reinstatement premiums. At March 31, 2009, IPC had total
shareholders equity of $1.849 billion and total
assets of $2.453 billion.
In response to a severe imbalance between the global supply of
and demand for property catastrophe reinsurance that developed
during the period from 1989 through 1993, IPC and IPCRe were
formed as Bermuda companies and commenced operations in June
1993 through the sponsorship of American International Group,
Inc. (AIG). On August 15, 2006, AIG sold its
entire shareholding in an underwritten public offering. As from
August 15, 2006, to IPCs knowledge, AIG no longer has
any direct ownership interest in IPC.
IPC Shares are quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under
the ticker symbol IPCR and the Bermuda Stock
Exchange under the symbol IPCR BH. IPCRe Europe
Limited, a subsidiary of IPCRe incorporated in Ireland,
underwrites select reinsurance business. Currently, IPCRe Europe
Limited retrocedes 90% of the business it underwrites to IPCRe.
33
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the risk factors set forth below, you should
read and consider other risk factors specific to each of the
Validus and IPC businesses that will also affect Validus after
consummation of the Amalgamation, described in Part I,
Item 1A of each companys annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and other documents
that have been filed with the SEC and all of which are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. If any of the risks described below or in
the reports incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus actually occurs, the respective businesses,
financial results, financial conditions, operating results or
share prices of Validus or IPC could be materially adversely
affected.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Amalgamation
The
value of the Validus Shares that the IPC shareholders receive in
the Amalgamation will vary as a result of the fixed exchange
ratio and possible fluctuations in the price of Validus
Shares.
Upon consummation of the Amalgamation each IPC Share (other than
IPC Shares held by dissenting IPC shareholders or by Validus and
its subsidiaries) will be exchanged into 0.9727 Validus Shares,
$7.50 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without
interest) and cash in lieu of fractional shares. Because the
exchange ratio is fixed at 0.9727 Validus Shares for each IPC
Share, the market value of the Validus Shares issued in exchange
for IPC Shares will depend upon the market price of a Validus
Share at the date the Amalgamation is consummated. If the price
of Validus Shares declines, IPC shareholders could receive less
value for their shares upon the consummation of the Amalgamation
than the value calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio on the
date the Amalgamation was announced or as of the date of the
filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Share price
changes may result from a variety of factors that are beyond the
companies control, including general market conditions,
changes in business prospects, catastrophic events, both natural
and man-made, and regulatory considerations.
In connection with the Amalgamation, Validus estimates that it
will need to issue approximately 54,959,648 Validus Shares. The
increase in the number of outstanding Validus Shares may lead to
sales of such shares or the perception that such sales may
occur, either of which may adversely affect the market for, and
the market price of, Validus Shares.
The
Amalgamation remains subject to conditions and failure to
complete the Amalgamation could negatively impact Validus and
IPC.
The Amalgamation Agreement contains a number of conditions
precedent that must be satisfied or waived prior to the
consummation of the Amalgamation. In addition, the Amalgamation
Agreement may be terminated under certain circumstances. See
The Amalgamation Agreement Termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement for a description of the
circumstances under which the Amalgamation Agreement can be
terminated.
If the Amalgamation is not completed, the ongoing business of
Validus and IPC may be adversely affected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the attention of management of Validus and IPC will have been
diverted to the Amalgamation instead of being directed solely to
each companys own operations and pursuit of other
opportunities that could have been beneficial to such company;
|
|
|
|
either Validus or IPC will have to pay certain costs relating to
the Amalgamation, including certain legal, accounting and
financial advisory fees;
|
|
|
|
either Validus or IPC may be required, in certain circumstances,
to pay a termination fee of $16 million to the other party;
and
|
|
|
|
in the case of Validus, Validus may not have a right to be
reimbursed the $50 million it advanced to IPC in respect of
the Max Termination Fee upon the execution of the Amalgamation
Agreement.
|
34
Validus
and/or IPC may waive one or more of the conditions to the
Amalgamation without resoliciting or seeking additional
shareholder approval.
Each of the conditions to Validus and IPCs
obligations to complete the Amalgamation, may be waived, to the
extent legally permissible, in whole or in part by the other
party. The board of directors of Validus and IPC will evaluate
the materiality of any such waiver to determine whether
resolicitation of proxies is necessary or, if shareholder
approval has been received, whether further shareholder approval
is necessary. In the event that any such waiver is not
determined to be significant enough to require resolicitation or
additional approval of shareholders, the Amalgamation may be
consummated without seeking any further shareholder approval.
Failure
to obtain effective consents of IPCs reinsurance
counterparties or Validus lenders to the Amalgamation
could materially adversely affect the Amalgamation or the
business of IPC or Validus.
With regards to IPCs reinsurance arrangements, many
in-force reinsurance contracts contain change of control
provisions. In addition, many of these reinsurance contracts are
annually renewable and whether or not they may be terminated in
a change of control, reinsurance cedants may choose not to renew
these contracts with the combined entity. Termination and
failure to renew reinsurance agreements by contractual
counterparties could result in a material adverse effect on the
combined entitys business, financial condition and
operating results, as well as on the market value of the
combined entitys common shares. In addition, if Validus is
unable to obtain the consent of the lenders under its credit
facilities to the Amalgamation, Validus may be required to pay
down the outstanding obligations. Currently, one requirement to
the effectiveness of the amendments to Validus credit
facilities is that the financial strength rating assigned to
Validus Re and IPCRe by A.M. Best is no lower than
A−. Following the announcement of the
Amalgamation Agreement, A.M. Best changed the outlook to
negative with respect to the A− financial strength rating
of Validus Re and indicated that the rating remained under
review. Additionally, following the announcement of the
Amalgamation Agreement, A.M. Best downgraded the financial
strength rating of IPCRe to A− from A and indicated that
the rating continues to be under review with negative
implications. This ratings requirement is not a condition to the
consummation of the Amalgamation under the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement. If the conditions to the effectiveness
of the lenders consents, such as the ratings requirement,
are not met, or Validus is required to pay down any obligations,
Validus may be forced to find alternative sources for secured
letters of credit, which may not be available, or if available,
may be on unfavorable terms.
Potential
payments made to dissenting IPC shareholders in respect of their
rights to appraisal of their shares could exceed the amount of
consideration otherwise due to them under the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement.
Any IPC shareholder may apply, within one month after the date
of notice convening the IPC special meeting, for an appraisal of
the fair value of its IPC Shares. See The
Amalgamation Dissenters Rights of Appraisal
for IPC Shareholders. Validus may be required to pay the
fair value appraised by the court to such dissenting shareholder
which could be less than, equal to or more than the amalgamation
consideration. Any such payments may have a material adverse
effect on Validus business, financial condition and
operating results, as well as the market price of the Validus
Shares.
The
financial analyses and forecasts considered by Validus and IPC
and their respective financial advisors may not be realized,
which may adversely affect the market price of the Validus
Shares following the Amalgamation.
In performing their financial analyses and rendering their
opinions regarding the fairness from a financial perspective of
the consideration in the Amalgamation, each of the respective
financial advisors to Validus and IPC independently reviewed and
relied on, among other things, internal stand-alone and pro
forma financial analyses and forecasts as separately
provided to each respective financial advisor by Validus or IPC.
See The Amalgamation Projected Financial
Information. These analyses and forecasts were prepared by,
or as directed by, the managements of Validus and IPC and were
also considered by Validus and IPCs boards of directors.
None of these analyses or forecasts was prepared with a view
towards public disclosure or compliance with the published
guidelines of the SEC or the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants
35
regarding projections and forecasts. These projections are
inherently based on various estimates and assumptions that are
subject to the judgment of those preparing them. These
projections are also subject to significant economic,
competitive, industry and other uncertainties and contingencies,
all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of
which are beyond the control of Validus and IPC. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that Validus or IPCs
financial condition or results of operations will not be
significantly worse than those set forth in such analyses and
forecasts. Significantly worse financial results could have a
material adverse effect on the market price of the Validus
Shares following the Amalgamation.
Certain
directors and executive officers of IPC have interests in the
Amalgamation that are different from, or in addition to, the
interests of IPC shareholders generally.
In considering the recommendation of the IPC board of directors
with respect to the Amalgamation, IPC shareholders should be
aware that, as discussed below under The
Amalgamation Interests of IPC Directors and
Executive Officers in the Amalgamation, certain of
IPCs directors and executive officers have financial
interests in the Amalgamation that are different from, or in
addition to, the interests of IPC shareholders generally.
The
Amalgamation Agreement contains provisions that restrict IPC
from pursuing alternative transactions or engaging in
discussions with third parties as to alternative
transactions.
The Amalgamation Agreement contains detailed provisions that
restrict IPCs and each of its subsidiaries ability
to initiate, solicit, encourage (including by providing
information) or facilitate proposals regarding any amalgamation
or similar transaction with another party or participate or
otherwise engage in any discussions or negotiations relating to
such an alternative transaction, unless such action is
reasonably likely to be required in order for the directors to
comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable law and
certain other conditions are satisfied. Although IPCs
board of directors is permitted to change its recommendation in
response to a bona fide unsolicited superior acquisition
proposal, such a change in its recommendation gives Validus the
right to terminate the Amalgamation Agreement, receive a
termination fee and receive reimbursement for the
$50 million advanced in respect of the Max Termination Fee.
For more information please see The Amalgamation
Agreement Restrictions on Change in Recommendation
by the Boards of Directors of IPC or Validus and
Restrictions on Solicitation of Acquisition
Proposals by IPC and The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Effects of Termination; Remedies.
The
Validus Shares to be received by IPC shareholders as a result of
the Amalgamation will have different rights from IPC
Shares.
Following completion of the Amalgamation, IPC shareholders will
no longer be shareholders of IPC, but will instead be
shareholders of Validus. There will be important differences
between your current rights as an IPC shareholder and the rights
to which you will be entitled as a shareholder of Validus. See
Comparison of Shareholders Rights for a discussion
of the different rights associated with Validus Shares.
Risk
Factors Relating to IPCs Businesses
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to
IPCs businesses that will also affect Validus after the
Amalgamation, described in Part I, Item 1A of the IPC
10-K and
other documents that have been filed by IPC with the SEC and
which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Risk
Factors Relating to Validus Businesses
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to
Validus businesses that will also affect Validus after the
Amalgamation, described in Part I, Item 1A of the
Validus 10-K
and other documents that have been filed by Validus with the SEC
and which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
Risk
Factors Relating to Validus Following the Amalgamation
36
Validus
may experience difficulties integrating IPCs businesses,
which could cause Validus to fail to realize the anticipated
benefits of the Amalgamation.
If the Amalgamation is consummated, achieving the anticipated
benefits of the Amalgamation will depend in part upon whether
the two companies integrate their businesses in an effective and
efficient manner. Validus may not be able to accomplish this
integration process smoothly or successfully. The integration of
certain operations following the Amalgamation will take time and
will require the dedication of significant management resources,
which may temporarily distract managements attention from
the routine business of the combined entity.
Any delay or inability of management to successfully integrate
the operations of the two companies could compromise the
combined entitys potential to achieve the anticipated
long-term strategic benefits of the Amalgamation and could have
a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition,
operating results and market value of Validus Shares after the
Amalgamation.
The
Amalgamation may result in ratings downgrades of one or more of
Validus insurance or reinsurance subsidiaries (including
the newly acquired IPC insurance and reinsurance operating
companies) which may adversely affect Validus business,
financial condition and operating results, as well as the market
price of Validus Shares.
Ratings with respect to claims paying ability and financial
strength are important factors in maintaining customer
confidence in Validus and its ability to market insurance and
reinsurance products and compete with other insurance and
reinsurance companies. Rating organizations regularly analyze
the financial performance and condition of insurers and
reinsurers and will likely reevaluate the ratings of Validus and
its reinsurance subsidiaries following the consummation of the
Amalgamation, if applicable. Following the announcement of the
Amalgamation Agreement, Standard & Poors revised
its outlook on Validus to positive from stable, and affirmed its
BBB− counterparty credit rating on Validus and
A.M. Best changed the outlook to negative with respect to
the A− financial strength rating and a- issuer
credit rating of Validus reinsurance subsidiary, Validus
Re, and the bbb− issuer credit rating of
Validus. In addition, Moodys affirmed its outlook of
negative with respect to the A3 insurance financial strength
rating of Validus Re and the Baa2 long-term issuer rating of
Validus. Additionally, following the announcement of the
Amalgamation Agreement, A.M. Best downgraded the financial
strength ratings to A− (Excellent) from A (Excellent) and
issuer credit ratings to a− from a
for the reinsurance subsidiaries of IPC (including IPCRe and
IPCRe Europe Limited) and also downgraded the issuer credit
rating to bbb− from bbb for IPC
and indicated that these ratings continue to be under review
with negative implications. Following the Amalgamation, any
ratings downgrades, or the potential for ratings downgrades, of
Validus or its subsidiaries (including the newly acquired IPC
operating companies) could adversely affect Validus
ability to market and distribute products and services and
successfully compete in the marketplace, which could have a
material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and
operating results, as well as the market price for Validus
Shares.
The
occurrence of severe catastrophic events after the completion of
the Amalgamation could cause Validus net income to be more
volatile than if the Amalgamation did not take
place.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus gross
premiums (excluding reinstatement premiums) written on property
catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total
gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31,
2008, 93% of IPCs gross premiums written covered property
catastrophe reinsurance risks. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, after giving effect to the Amalgamation
as if it had been consummated on December 31, 2008, gross
premiums written on property catastrophe business would have
been $661.9 million or 37.5% of total gross premiums of
Validus on a pro forma basis. Because Validus after the
Amalgamation will, among other things, have larger aggregate
exposures to natural and man-made disasters than it does today,
Validus aggregate loss experience could have a significant
influence on Validus net income. Please see Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information.
37
THE
AMALGAMATION
General
Description
On July 9, 2009, IPC, Validus and Validus Ltd. entered into
the Amalgamation Agreement. Validus board of directors
unanimously adopted the Amalgamation Agreement on that date and
deemed it fair, advisable and in the best interests of Validus
to enter into the Amalgamation Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated thereby. IPCs board of directors
unanimously adopted the Amalgamation Agreement on that date and
authorized and approved the Amalgamation upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the Amalgamation
Agreement and deemed it fair to, advisable to and in the best
interests of IPC and its shareholders to enter into the
Amalgamation Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation and
the other transactions contemplated thereby.
Subject to shareholder approval as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and the satisfaction or waiver of the other
conditions specified in the Amalgamation Agreement, on the
Closing Date of the Amalgamation, IPC will amalgamate with
Validus Ltd. Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, after the
effective time of the Amalgamation, IPC shareholders (other than
shareholders that exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Bermuda
law, and other than Validus and its subsidiaries) will have the
right to receive 0.9727 Validus Shares, $7.50 in cash (less any
applicable withholding tax and without interest) and cash in
lieu of fractional shares in exchange for each IPC Share they
hold.
Further details relating to the structure of the Amalgamation
and the amalgamation consideration are described in The
Amalgamation Agreement Structure of the Amalgamation
and The Amalgamation Agreement Amalgamation
Consideration.
Background
Since its inception in 1993, IPC has successfully operated as a
monoline company focused on property catastrophe reinsurance.
IPC has periodically reviewed ways to enhance its performance
and prospects in light of conditions in the reinsurance and
insurance markets, economic conditions, regulatory developments
and competitive and other factors. Following the losses from the
2005 Atlantic hurricanes, the rating agencies increased the
capital requirements for monoline property catastrophe
reinsurers. By October 2007, it was evident to IPCs
management and IPCs board of directors that if IPC
continued to follow the monoline property catastrophe model IPC
had previously pursued, it might be more challenging to optimize
shareholder value in the future as compared to following a more
diversified business model. IPCs board of directors, with
input from IPCs management, decided that strategic options
should be developed and evaluated. To drive this process
forward, on October 23, 2007 IPCs board of directors
established IPCs business development committee to assist
IPCs management in developing such options for review by
IPCs board of directors.
In the first quarter of 2008, IPC engaged JPMorgan to assist IPC
with a strategic review process. As part of that strategic
review process, IPCs board of directors and IPCs
management confirmed their preliminary conclusion that it would
be in IPCs interest to diversify beyond its monoline
property catastrophe business model. IPCs board of
directors and IPCs management determined to consider
achieving these objectives by investigating the opportunities to
do so through internal growth or a business combination with a
company with diversified business lines and platforms with a
market capitalization of a similar size to IPCs market
capitalization.
In March of 2008, IPCs business development committee
asked IPCs management to develop two business plans in
order to assist IPCs directors in their strategic review:
a monoline plan that assumed IPC would continue as a
monoline property catastrophe reinsurer, and an organic
growth plan, consisting of an organic diversification of
business lines and platforms over time leveraging existing
resources of the company. During the summer of 2008, IPCs
management, after discussion with IPCs board of directors,
also began consideration of a run-off scenario which
assumed that IPC would cease to write new business and return
capital to its shareholders over time as reserves were paid out.
38
From July through early November 2008, IPCs business
development committee began considering early versions of the
organic growth case developed by IPCs management for
diversifying IPCs business lines. In addition, IPC, with
JPMorgans assistance, started to identify and evaluate
potential counterparties, including Validus and Max, that were
of a similar size to IPC, and with whom a combination
potentially could diversify IPCs business lines and
platforms for the purpose of reducing the volatility inherent in
focusing on catastrophe reinsurance and spreading IPCs
risk base across less correlated risks. IPCs business
development committee, with assistance from JPMorgan, designed a
process to narrow the field of potential counterparties to a
select list and to meet with, exchange information with and
select potential counterparties to continue in IPCs
strategic process. In early October, after discussions among IPC
management, IPCs board of directors and JPMorgan,
IPCs board of directors authorized JPMorgan to contact a
select list of third parties from among the potential
counterparties and peer companies that IPC initially considered.
The parties on the select list were those that IPC determined
were most likely to satisfy its strategic objectives that
IPCs board of directors had developed at that time, and it
excluded parties that IPC believed were not appropriate
potential counterparties for a business combination. For
example, although IPC had previously identified Validus as a
potential counterparty because of its similar size to IPC, after
careful consideration IPC did not include Validus in its select
list of potential counterparties for JPMorgan to contact because
IPC determined that a business combination with Validus was not
likely to satisfy IPCs strategic objectives.
During the second half of October 2008 and first half of
November, IPC entered into confidentiality and standstill
agreements with eight of these potential counterparties: Party
A, Party B, Party C, Party D, Party E, Party F, Party G and Max.
Subsequently, JPMorgan and IPC management received an
unsolicited oral indication of interest from a party
(Party H) that IPCs board of directors and
management had previously decided not to consider inviting into
IPCs strategic process after determining that a
transaction with Party H would not meet IPCs
strategic objectives. IPC management also received an informal
indication of interest from Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings
Limited (Flagstone), a smaller Bermuda based
insurance and reinsurance company than IPC as measured by market
capitalization, discussions with which IPC determined not to be
in the best interest of IPC to pursue further.
The initial contact between IPC and Max was made on
October 14, 2008. Representatives from JPMorgan placed a
call to Maxs chief executive officer, W. Marston Becker,
and informed him that they had been engaged to assist with a
strategic review of IPC and that Max had been identified as a
potential counterparty for a business combination transaction.
On October 26, 2008, Max and IPC entered into the
confidentiality and standstill agreement mentioned above in
order for the parties to continue discussions and exchange
information.
On October 27, 2008, JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch, which was
acting as Maxs financial advisor with respect to a
potential business combination with IPC, had a conference call
to discuss the next steps in the process of a potential
transaction between IPC and Max.
During this time, JPMorgan also had preliminary discussions with
each of Party A, Party B, Party C, Party D, Party E and Party G
to assess their interest in a combination with IPC and their fit
with the strategic goals of IPCs board of directors. In
the course of these discussions, Party A indicated that it was
not interested in engaging in discussions regarding any
transaction until after January 1, 2009, when the period in
which most reinsurance contracts are renewed had ended. Party F
failed to schedule any meetings with IPC or its advisors and
showed little interest in further pursuing a transaction with
IPC. IPC ceased discussions with Party F shortly thereafter.
On November 3, 2008, IPC received an unsolicited letter
from a large, publicly traded insurance company (Party
J) proposing that IPC and Party J enter into an
exclusivity agreement to discuss an acquisition of IPC by Party
J in a stock-for-stock transaction.
IPCs business development committee met on
November 6, 2008 with JPMorgan and IPCs outside legal
counsel to consider the terms contained in Party Js
letter. IPCs business development committee determined,
because Party Js proposal was based on an unsatisfactory
valuation of IPCs book value and was subject to
39
detailed due diligence, that it was not in IPCs best
interest to enter into an exclusivity agreement with Party J and
authorized IPCs management to respond to Party Js
letter by declining to enter into an exclusivity agreement but
offering to allow Party J to otherwise participate in IPCs
on-going strategic process. On November 7, 2008, IPC
responded to Party Js offer by sending it a letter
proposing that IPC and Party J enter into a confidentiality and
standstill agreement and that Party J participate in IPCs
on-going strategic process on the same basis as the other
parties already in discussions with IPC. Party J responded in a
letter on November 10, 2008 withdrawing its original offer
and declining to participate in IPCs strategic process.
At the same meeting on November 6, 2008, IPCs
business development committee also determined that it was not
in IPCs best interest to delay further discussions of a
business combination until after January 1, 2009 and
decided to continue moving ahead in the strategic process
without Party A.
From the beginning of November through December 10, 2008,
IPC management engaged in discussions regarding potential
business combinations of IPC with Party B, Party C, Party D,
Party E and Party G. On November 10, 2008, certain officers
and representatives of Max met with IPCs directors, Mark
R. Bridges and Peter S. Christie and with James P. Bryce,
IPCs chief executive officer at that time, John R. Weale,
IPCs chief financial officer at that time, and JPMorgan to
discuss the process and to present Maxs preliminary views
regarding a potential business combination. Max and IPC each
provided updates on their respective business and operations,
including an assessment of the then-current business climate. On
November 26, 2008, members of Maxs management met
with Kenneth L. Hammond, the Chairman of IPCs board of
directors, and Mr. Bridges to further discuss the potential
business combination between IPC and Max. Max was invited to
submit a proposal for a business combination with IPC by
December 8, 2008. In connection therewith, JPMorgan and
Merrill Lynch held various calls to discuss the potential
amalgamation.
On December 5, 2008, after consulting with Merrill Lynch,
Max developed and submitted a preliminary proposal for a
business combination transaction between IPC and Max structured
as a stock-for-stock transaction with an exchange ratio based on
the relative book values of the two companies. Max also provided
information regarding its intentions with respect to the
combined business, the board of directors, and the roles of
management.
During this time period, IPCs officers and directors met
several times among themselves and with IPCs outside
advisors to discuss the status of negotiations with each party
and worked to develop the specific terms upon which IPC would be
willing to enter into a business combination. IPC also asked
Party B, Party C, Party D, Party E and Party G to submit formal
business combination proposals before December 8, 2008.
At a meeting on December 10, 2008, IPCs directors and
management reconfirmed their view that Party H did not meet
IPCs strategic objectives and determined not to pursue
further discussions with Party H.
Also during the meeting on December 10, 2008, IPCs
directors and management reviewed the business combination
proposals that had been received from other potential
counterparties. In addition to Max, IPC had received formal
written proposals from Party B, Party C and Party D. Party E
submitted an oral proposal. After a discussion among IPCs
directors and management, with input from JPMorgan and
IPCs outside counsel, IPC determined not to pursue further
discussions with Party E because the oral proposal did not
satisfy the criteria IPC had established. Party G had
communicated that a business combination with IPC did not fit
within Party Gs strategic plan at that time and that Party
G no longer wished to continue to be considered a potential
counterparty to a business combination. IPC determined to cease
further negotiations with Party G.
Between December 10 and December 17, 2008, IPCs
management and JPMorgan continued discussions with Party B,
Party C and Party D and worked to further develop proposals from
these parties.
On December 16, 2008, Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan had a
conference call to review Maxs proposal and provide IPC
additional information regarding Max and its proposal.
On December 17, 2008, IPCs business development
committee met to discuss the proposals received from Max as well
as from Party B, Party C and Party D. IPCs business
development committee found the
40
proposals from Party C, Party D and Max to be in line with the
rationale and goals IPC had set for entering into a business
combination. The proposal received from Party B, despite
repeated negotiations with IPCs management and JPMorgan,
failed to satisfy many of IPCs desired characteristics,
and included terms in which IPCs shareholders would
receive
non-U.S. listed
stock as consideration along with a complex debt security.
Accordingly, IPC determined to cease pursuing a potential
transaction with Party B as that proposal was not deemed to be
in the best interests of IPC.
Also on December 17, 2008, members of IPCs business
development committee met with a group of individuals
(Party K) who had expressed an interest in a
transaction with IPC to pursue a strategy of transformational
organic growth by diversifying IPCs business lines under a
new senior management team.
On December 19, 2008, IPCs board of directors met and
discussed the proposals from Party C, Party D and Max with
IPCs management and IPCs advisors in conjunction
with discussing IPCs monoline and organic growth business
plans. IPCs board of directors approved IPC continuing
discussions regarding a business combination with Party C, Party
D and Max. IPCs board of directors also instructed
IPCs management to finalize a formal presentation
regarding the monoline plan, the organic growth plan and the
run-off scenario. IPCs board of directors also asked
IPCs management to benchmark projected growth under the
monoline plan, the organic growth plan and potential business
combinations against the growth achieved by selected Bermuda
reinsurance companies that had pursued a transformational
organic growth strategy in the past. During this meeting, one of
IPCs directors, Peter Christie, confirmed a prior informal
disclosure to IPCs other directors that he owned 10,667
Max common shares.
On December 22, 2008, Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan had a
conference call in which JPMorgan relayed concerns from
IPCs board of directors relating to the preliminary
proposal submitted by Max, including the fact that Maxs
proposed exchange ratio did not account for the market prices of
the companies at that time.
Between December 19, 2008 and January 6, 2009,
IPCs management and JPMorgan engaged in several meetings
and other discussions with Party C, Party D and Max to further
explore issues surrounding a business combination with each
party. IPC and its advisors also engaged in an assessment of the
members of senior management of Party C, Party D and Max,
evaluating the capabilities and qualifications of such
management to manage a combined company.
On January 6, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss IPCs business development committees meeting
with Party K. IPC management and JPMorgan also discussed the
results of further discussions with Party C, Party D and Max,
including that Max and IPC continued to be engaged in
negotiations regarding the valuation methodology to be used for
valuing the respective companies in a business combination
transaction.
During this time, Max and its advisors conducted business and
financial due diligence on IPC. On January 6, 2009, after
consultation and discussions with Merrill Lynch, Max submitted a
revised proposal to IPC. The revised proposal continued to be
based on a stock-for-stock transaction, but the exchange ratio
was amended to consider both the relative book values and the
relative market values of the companies by basing the exchange
ratio on the average of the two companies market value per
share and book value per share. On the following day, Merrill
Lynch had a conference call with JPMorgan to review and answer
clarifying questions on Maxs revised proposal.
On January 8, 2009, Max, IPC, Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan
had a meeting to review and discuss IPCs financial
information. Following this meeting, Max had a meeting with IPC
on January 12, 2008 to review its financial information.
On January 11, 2009, IPC received a formal, written
proposal from Party K.
On January 13, 2009, IPCs business development
committee met to discuss setting timelines for completing the
process of evaluating potential transactions with Party C, Party
D, Party K and Max and developed formal counterproposals with
regard to Party C, Party D and Max.
On January 15, 2009, Merrill Lynch and JPMorgan had calls
during which JPMorgan provided an update on the process and
reviewed next steps.
41
IPCs board of directors met on January 16, 2009 and
reviewed the revised proposal received from Max and revised
proposals IPC had received from Party C and Party D.
IPCs board of directors, in conjunction with IPCs
management, developed counterproposals for Party C, Party D and
Max and authorized JPMorgan to communicate the respective
counterproposals to each party. IPCs board of directors
also discussed the written proposal that had been received from
Party K, determined that it was not in IPCs best interest
to pursue a transaction with Party K at that time and authorized
IPCs business development committee to communicate that
determination to Party K.
From January 16 until January 29, 2009, IPC and its outside
advisors (including an independent consulting firm, an
independent investment advisory firm, an independent accounting
firm and IPCs legal advisors) engaged in due diligence on
Max and Party C. IPCs management met separately several
times with the management teams of Max and Party C, along with
their respective advisors, and worked together with Max and
Party C to develop views on preliminary business plans for
potential combined companies and conduct preliminary due
diligence on key threshold items. IPC also continued negotiating
the terms of a business combination with Max and Party C during
this time and prepared and negotiated term sheets with each of
Max and Party C. During the course of those negotiations IPC and
Party D, a non-publicly traded company, could not come to an
agreement over the proper method for valuing Party D. As a
result, IPC and Party D determined not to engage in further
discussions regarding a business combination.
IPC provided a term sheet to Max on January 17, 2009 and
had organizational due diligence calls with Max and Merrill
Lynch on January 19, 2009 and in-person due diligence
meetings with Max and Merrill Lynch on January 21, 2009.
On January 23, 2009, Max and Merrill Lynch provided
comments to IPCs draft non-binding term sheet to JPMorgan
and Merrill Lynch had conference calls with JPMorgan to discuss
the comments.
On January 27, 2009, certain officers of Max met with
Messrs. Hammond and Bridges to review each companys
financial information as well as preliminary views as to how the
businesses could be combined.
On January 29, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the ongoing strategic review process. IPCs
management presented its formal monoline and organic growth
plans to IPCs board of directors. IPCs board of
directors, with input from management and IPCs outside
advisors, then discussed the results of the due diligence
investigations into Party C and Max and the status of ongoing
negotiations with each party. IPCs board of directors also
discussed its views of Party Cs and Maxs respective
management teams. At the conclusion of the meeting, IPCs
board of directors concluded that while no decision had been
made to enter into a definitive transaction agreement with any
party, pursuing such a transaction with Max (including
performing additional due diligence and negotiating a definitive
transaction agreement) would be more in IPCs interest than
pursuing such a transaction with Party C. IPCs board of
directors authorized IPC management to finalize a non-binding
term sheet with Max, including the valuation methodology upon
which the definitive transaction agreement would be entered
into, and also to enter into an exclusivity agreement with Max.
On January 30, 2009, Mr. Hammond informed
representatives of Max about IPCs proposal to enter into
an exclusivity agreement with Max.
IPCs and Maxs management, along with their
respective advisors, negotiated the exclusivity agreement and
the non-binding term sheet between January 30 and
February 2, 2009. On February 2, 2009, Max and IPC
finalized the non-binding term sheet and entered into a
28-day
exclusivity agreement. The non-binding term sheet provided,
among other things, for the basic framework for the transaction
structure, governance for the combined company and a methodology
to arrive at an exchange ratio for the transaction, based on an
average of the two companies market value per share and
book value per share.
On January 31, 2009, while IPC and Max were in discussions
regarding the exclusivity agreement and the non-binding term
sheet, Party C notified IPC that it no longer wished to engage
in discussions regarding a business combination with IPC.
In the period from February 2 to February 20, 2009,
representatives of management of IPC and its advisors and
independent consultants, and representatives of management of
Max and its financial and legal advisors, worked to continue
IPCs due diligence investigation into Max and Maxs
due diligence investigation
42
into IPC. IPCs outside legal advisor provided to Max and
Maxs outside legal advisor, a form of amalgamation
agreement, and worked with Maxs outside legal advisor to
negotiate definitive transaction documentation.
On February 11, 2009, Max announced its financial results
for the fiscal quarter and year ended December 31, 2008 and
Maxs management held a conference call with analysts and
other interested parties to discuss such results.
On February 11 and February 12, 2009, IPC and Max made
joint presentations to A.M. Best Company,
Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC, and
Moodys Investors Service regarding IPCs and
Maxs managements views of the potential financial
strength of a potential combined company.
IPC contacted Wachovia Bank, National Association
(Wachovia) on February 13, 2009, to begin
discussions regarding amending IPCs credit facility to
permit IPC to enter into and consummate an amalgamation
agreement with Max without potentially causing any default under
the credit facility. During this same period, Max engaged in
discussions with its lender syndicate regarding a potential
amendment to its credit facility. After discussions with
IPCs and Maxs management and their advisors,
Wachovia and several other banks who were members of IPCs
and Maxs respective loan syndicates signed confidentiality
agreements with IPC and Max during the week of February 16,
2009. Between February 16 and March 1, 2009, IPC, Max and
their advisors negotiated the terms of the amendments to both
Maxs and IPCs respective credit facilities.
On February 17, 2009, IPC announced its financial results
for the fiscal quarter and year ended December 31, 2008 and
IPCs management held a conference call on the morning of
February 18, 2009 with analysts and other interested
parties to discuss such results.
On February 18, 2009, directors from IPC met with
Maxs directors and certain of Maxs officers.
Maxs chief executive officer made a presentation to the
members of both boards of directors regarding the potential
benefits of a combination of IPC and Max and described
Maxs managements vision for the combined company and
the role that a combined Max-IPC management team would have in
achieving that vision.
On February 20, 2009, IPCs board of directors met,
along with JPMorgan and other of IPCs advisors, and
discussed with Mr. Roberts, Maxs chief financial
officer, and Maxs and IPCs independent accounting
firm to discuss potential purchase accounting adjustments that
could result from a combination of IPC and Max. Following this
discussion, Mr. Roberts and Maxs independent
accounting firm left the meeting. Representatives of IPCs
outside legal counsel discussed with IPCs directors each
directors legal duties in connection with considering a
transaction with Max. IPC management presented a run-off
scenario to IPCs directors, as well as the results of a
benchmarking of the book value growth achieved by selected
Bermuda reinsurance companies that had implemented a
transformational organic growth strategy between 2002 and the
first half of 2005. The benchmarking analysis compared these
book value growth rates to projected book value growth under the
monoline case, the organic growth case and a potential
combination with Max. IPC management also presented a business
plan for the combined company that had been developed together
with Max. IPCs directors also received due diligence
reports from IPCs advisors, including an independent
consulting firm, an independent investment advisory firm, an
independent accounting firm and IPCs legal advisors, and
discussed the results of such advisors due diligence.
Between February 20 and February 27, 2008, IPCs and
Maxs officers and advisors continued to engage in
negotiations and due diligence on the other company, including
negotiations regarding transaction protection provisions to be
contained in any definitive amalgamation agreement.
On February 25, 2009, IPCs board of directors
convened by telephone along with IPCs advisors to discuss
the results of further negotiations with Max. IPCs board
of directors discussed a number of transaction terms that were
still being negotiated, including extensive discussions
regarding the transaction protections, closing conditions and
termination rights to be included in the definitive amalgamation
agreement.
On February 27, 2009, a meeting of IPCs board of
directors was held. JPMorgan made a presentation to IPCs
board of directors regarding its financial analysis. IPCs
management, JPMorgan and Sullivan &
43
Cromwell LLP provided an overview of events since IPCs
board of directors telephonic meeting on February 25,
2009. IPCs management and outside advisors, including an
independent consulting firm, an independent investment advisory
firm, an independent accounting firm and IPCs legal
advisors, reported the final results of their in-depth due
diligence review of Max and its business. IPCs board of
directors discussed prevailing market conditions and IPCs
strategic alternatives. Representatives of IPCs outside
legal counsel discussed with IPCs board of directors their
legal duties in connection with any consideration of a possible
strategic transaction. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP also
presented a summary of the legal terms of the most recent draft
of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, including the shareholder and
regulatory approvals that would be required to complete the
transaction and the possible timeframe for obtaining such
approvals. During the remainder of February 27, February 28
and the morning of March 1, 2009, IPCs business
development committee and representatives of IPCs and
Maxs management and their respective legal and financial
advisors worked to finalize the Max Amalgamation Agreement and
related definitive documentation.
On March 1, 2009, IPC and Max reached an agreement, subject
to their respective board of directors approval, on an
exchange ratio by which the holders of Max common shares would
receive 0.6429 IPC Shares in exchange for each Max common share
held by Max shareholders.
IPCs board of directors met again on March 1, 2009.
JPMorgan presented an analysis of the financial terms of the Max
proposal. IPCs management also updated IPCs
directors on the results of negotiations with the banks in
IPCs credit facility and described the terms of the
amendment that would need to be entered into if IPC intended to
execute an amalgamation agreement with Max.
JPMorgan then delivered to IPCs board of directors its
oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing on the same day,
that based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions
stated in that opinion, as of March 1, 2009, the exchange
ratio of 0.6429 IPC Shares to be exchanged in respect of each
Max common share in the transaction was fair, from a financial
point of view, to IPC.
Following these discussions, and extensive review and discussion
among IPCs directors, IPCs board of directors
unanimously approved the Max Amalgamation Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and declared the amalgamation
and other transactions contemplated in the Max Amalgamation
Agreement, including the amendments proposed to IPCs
credit facilities, to be advisable and in the best interests of
IPC. IPCs board of directors resolved that a meeting of
the IPC shareholders be convened to approve the bye-law
amendments, approve the name change, approve the issuance of IPC
Shares to Max shareholders as contemplated by the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, and elect the directors named therein.
IPCs board of directors then directed that management sign
the definitive Max Amalgamation Agreement as soon as reasonably
practicable.
In the afternoon of March 1, 2009, the parties executed the
Max Amalgamation Agreement. Prior to the opening of the
financial markets in New York City on March 2, 2009, IPC
and Max announced that they had entered into a transaction
contemplating the amalgamation of Max and IPC (the
Proposed Max Amalgamation).
On March 18, 2009, Validus engaged Greenhill to assist
Validus with reviewing a possible offer to acquire IPC.
Validus board of directors met on March 25, 2009 to
consider the terms of an offer to acquire each outstanding IPC
Share in exchange for a number of Validus Shares based on a
fixed exchange ratio, subject to the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement. Following discussions among
Validus directors, Validus board of directors
authorized and directed Validus management to make an
offer to IPC to exchange each outstanding IPC Share for a number
of Validus Shares based on a fixed exchange ratio, subject to
the termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
On March 27, 2009, IPC filed a Registration Statement on
Form S-4
with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Max Amalgamation
(as amended from time to time, the IPC/Max
S-4).
44
During this period, Validus management and its financial
advisors analyzed the pro forma effect of the proposed offer to
acquire IPC on Validus financial position, earnings, book
value and rating agency capital position and discussed the
impact on Validus with its directors and its rating agencies.
On March 29, 2009, following discussions among
Validus directors, Validus board of directors
unanimously approved the initial Validus offer to acquire IPC
(the Initial Validus Offer), pursuant to which each
IPC Share would be exchanged for 1.2037 Validus Shares, and the
transactions contemplated thereby and declared the Initial
Validus Offer and other transactions contemplated thereby to be
fair to, advisable and in the best interests of Validus, subject
to receipt from Greenhill of its opinion to the board of
directors of Validus that the exchange ratio of 1.2037 Validus
Shares for each IPC Share was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Validus.
On March 30, 2009, Greenhill, financial advisor to Validus,
delivered its oral opinion to the board of directors of Validus,
subsequently confirmed in writing, that, based upon and subject
to the various limitations and assumptions described in the
written opinion, as of March 31, 2009, the consideration
pursuant to the Initial Validus Offer, pursuant to which each
IPC Share would be exchanged for 1.2037 Validus Shares, was
fair, from a financial point of view, to Validus.
On the morning of March 31, 2009, Edward J. Noonan, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors
of Validus, placed a telephone call to James P. Bryce, who was
at that time the Chief Executive Officer and President of IPC.
Mr. Noonan spoke with Mr. Bryce and explained that
Validus intended to make an offer to exchange each outstanding
IPC Share for 1.2037 Validus Shares, subject to the termination
of the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
Following this telephone call, in the morning of March 31,
2009, Validus delivered a proposal letter containing the Initial
Validus Offer to IPCs board of directors in care of
Mr. Bryce and issued a press release announcing the Initial
Validus Offer. The Initial Validus Offer contemplated an
acquisition of IPC by Validus pursuant to a share-for-share
exchange in which each IPC Share would be exchanged for 1.2037
Validus Shares. The closing price of a Validus Share on the NYSE
on March 30, 2009, the day prior to the announcement of the
Initial Validus Offer, was $24.91, resulting in an implied
premium for Validus offer to IPCs market price of
18.0% (calculated based on the closing price of Validus Shares
times the number of Validus Shares to be exchanged for each IPC
Share). The Initial Validus Offer was based on the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, but with certain differences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the Initial Validus Offer, Validus would issue
Validus Shares in exchange for IPC Shares, whereas in the
Proposed Max Amalgamation IPC would issue IPC Shares in exchange
for the common shares of Max.
|
|
|
|
Validus obligation to close the proposed acquisition would
be conditioned on obtaining all waivers or amendments that
Validus, in its sole discretion, deemed to be necessary under
any of IPCs or Validus credit facilities. The Max
Amalgamation Agreement did not include such a closing condition
and IPC and Max had previously obtained all requisite amendments
required under their respective credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
The Initial Validus Offer was not subject to U.S. insurance
regulatory approvals.
|
|
|
|
Validus proposed that IPC, but not Validus, would be bound by
certain deal protection and non-solicitation provisions. Under
the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC and Max were reciprocally
bound under similar provisions.
|
|
|
|
The Initial Validus Offer did not contemplate that any of
IPCs directors would serve on the board of directors of
Validus or any of its subsidiaries after the consummation of the
acquisition, nor did it provide for IPCs management to
have any role in the management of Validus or its subsidiaries
after the consummation of the acquisition. By contrast, under
the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC and Max agreed to provide
for representation from both companies independent
directors on the combined entitys board of directors
(including IPCs chairman as chairman of the combined
entity) and for IPCs management to have senior positions
in the management of the combined entity. Validus stated in a
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
press release dated April 2, 2009, that it would be willing
to discuss continued board representation in the potential
Validus-IPC combined entity for members of IPCs board of
directors.
|
On that same day, IPC issued a press release announcing that
IPCs board of directors would review the terms of the
Initial Validus Offer in a manner consistent with its
obligations under the Max Amalgamation Agreement and applicable
law.
Also in the afternoon on March 31, 2009, Max issued a press
release announcing that it had received from IPC a copy of the
letter from Validus outlining the Initial Validus Offer and
stating, in part, that it believed that Maxs track record
of building a diversified platform should lead to better
long-term growth prospects and value creation following
completion of the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On April 1, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the Initial Validus Offer. At that meeting, IPCs
outside legal advisors reviewed with IPCs board of
directors the directors fiduciary duties under Bermuda law
and related legal considerations applicable to IPCs board
of directors review of the Initial Validus Offer,
including an analysis of the applicable requirements of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement. IPCs board of directors considered
certain information regarding Validus and certain financial
aspects of the Initial Validus Offer including the following
(which to the extent relating to Validus, was based on publicly
available information, including information contained in
Validus SEC filings): an overview of Validus current
and historical share price and trading multiples; IPCs
trading multiples implied by the Initial Validus Offer; implied
premiums and discounts to IPCs common share price
represented by the Initial Validus Offer over different time
periods; Validus historical financial performance; rating
agency reviews; and commentary of sell-side analysts regarding
Validus.
On April 2, 2009, Max delivered a letter to IPCs
board of directors describing several reasons Max did not
believe the Initial Validus Offer to be a superior proposal
within the meaning of the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Later that
same day, IPCs board of directors received a letter from
Validus disputing the statements made in Maxs letter.
Between April 1, 2009 and April 6, 2009, members of
the business development committee of IPCs board of
directors met several times, either telephonically or in person,
with IPC management and IPCs advisors to discuss the
Initial Validus Offer.
On April 6, 2009, IPCs board of directors met again
to further review the Initial Validus Offer. IPCs outside
legal advisors reviewed with IPCs board of directors their
fiduciary duties under Bermuda law, the related legal
considerations resulting from the Max Amalgamation Agreement,
Validus reservation of rights to withdraw the Initial
Validus Offer and certain other legal, regulatory and timing
aspects of the Initial Validus Offer. IPCs board of
directors considered certain information regarding Validus and
certain financial aspects of the Initial Validus Offer,
including the following (which, to the extent relating to
Validus, was based on publicly available information, including
information contained in Validus SEC filings): business
mix; historical operating performance and benchmarking against
peers; review of losses from hurricanes Ike and Gustav;
estimates of risk exposure to certain catastrophe events;
current balance sheet; investment portfolio and historical
investment returns; rating agency and equity analyst
information; an overview of Validus current and historical
share price, trading multiples, trading volume and float;
IPCs trading multiples implied by the Initial Validus
Offer over different time periods; implied premiums and
discounts to the price of IPCs common shares represented
by the Initial Validus Offer; implied premiums and discounts
represented by the exchange ratio in the Initial Validus Offer
over the exchange ratio implied by market prices, exchange ratio
implied by book value and exchange ratio implied by tangible
book value; an illustration of potential value creation that
could result from an acquisition of IPC by Validus at various
price to book value trading multiples; and a preliminary
analysis of the accretion (or dilution) that would result from
an acquisition of IPC by Validus. In certain instances, the
information presented was on a comparative basis to Max and IPC
or to the Proposed Max Amalgamation. IPCs board of
directors did not request, and JPMorgan did not provide, an
opinion as to the fairness or inadequacy of the Initial Validus
Offer. IPCs board of directors determined not to request
an updated fairness opinion from JPMorgan regarding the Proposed
Max Amalgamation or an opinion as to the fairness or inadequacy
of the Initial Validus Offer after consideration of (1) the
fact that IPC was already bound by the terms of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, (2) IPCs rights and
obligations under the
46
Max Amalgamation Agreement and Bermuda law to perform under the
Max Amalgamation Agreement
and/or
change its recommendation to IPCs shareholders regarding
the Proposed Max Amalgamation and (3) the proposed terms of
the Initial Validus Offer. IPCs board of directors also
took into consideration its determination that an acquisition of
IPC by Validus would not satisfy the strategic objective IPC had
identified at that time of diversifying its risk base and would
involve other significant risks inherent in the Validus Shares
and the Initial Validus Offer.
IPCs board of directors met again on the morning of
April 7, 2009. After thoroughly reviewing the Initial
Validus Offer and after consulting with management and its
outside legal and financial advisors and upon consideration of a
variety of factors, IPCs board of directors unanimously
determined that the Initial Validus Offer did not constitute a
superior proposal as defined in the Max Amalgamation Agreement
and reaffirmed its recommendation of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On April 7, 2009, following IPCs board of directors
meeting, IPC advised Max of the determination of IPCs
board of directors that the Initial Validus Offer did not
represent a superior proposal under the terms of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement.
Also on April 7, 2009, IPC issued a press release
announcing that IPCs board of directors, after thorough
consideration and consultation with management and its legal and
financial advisors, determined that the Initial Validus Offer
did not constitute a superior proposal under the terms of the
Max Amalgamation Agreement, and reaffirming its recommendation
that IPC shareholders approve the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
IPCs board of directors also sent a letter to Validus
setting forth several of the reasons why IPCs board of
directors did not determine the Initial Validus Offer to be a
superior proposal.
On April 8, 2009, Validus sent a letter to IPCs board
of directors regarding the IPC press release and letter and
issued a press release announcing the letter, which stated that
Validus intended to file proxy solicitation materials opposing
the Proposed Max Amalgamation and that it was commencing
litigation to seek to have reduced the $50 million
termination fee payable in certain circumstances under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement.
On April 9, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy
statement with the SEC which, in its definitive form, was used
to solicit votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On April 13, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4.
On April 16, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy
statement with the SEC with respect to soliciting votes from
Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares
in connection with the Initial Validus Offer.
On April 21, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment
to the preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting
votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed a claim in the Supreme
Court of Bermuda against IPC, IPC Limited and Max (the
Bermuda Claim), challenging the validity of the
termination fee under the Max Amalgamation Agreement and
provisions which restricted the ability of IPC to discuss
competing proposals with third parties (no-talk
provisions) in the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
Also on April 28, 2009, IPC filed a second amendment to the
IPC/Max S-4
with the SEC.
On April 30, 2009, Validus issued a press release outlining
its three-part plan to expedite the acquisition of IPC.
First, Validus would solicit proxies from IPC
shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
Second, Validus would commence an exchange offer (the
Exchange Offer) for all of the outstanding IPC
Shares, subject to the terms and conditions described in the
prospectus/offer to exchange included in the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed by Validus with the SEC on May 12, 2009, as amended,
including the receipt of at least 90% of the IPC Shares,
termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement and other
conditions consistent with the Initial Validus Offer. Under
Bermuda law, if Validus acquired at least 90% of the IPC Shares
which it sought to acquire in the Exchange Offer, Validus
believes it would have the right to acquire the remaining IPC
Shares on the same terms in a second-step acquisition.
47
Third, Validus would pursue a scheme of arrangement (the
Scheme of Arrangement) under Part VII of
The Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, as amended. In order to
implement the Scheme of Arrangement, IPC shareholders would have
to approve the Scheme of Arrangement at a court-ordered IPC
meeting, IPC would have to separately approve the Scheme of
Arrangement, the IPC shareholders would have to approve certain
Validus proposals and the Scheme of Arrangement would have to be
sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda.
Also on April 30, 2009, IPCs board of directors met
to discuss Validus announcement. At that meeting,
IPCs board of directors unanimously reaffirmed its belief
that the Initial Validus Offer did not represent a superior
proposal and that IPCs board of directors continued to
recommend IPC shareholders vote in favor of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment to
its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
Also on May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to
expedite the trial of the Bermuda Claim.
On May 4, 2009, IPC filed a third amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4 with the
SEC.
On May 7, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its
preliminary proxy statement with the SEC with respect to
soliciting votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
Also on May 7, 2009, IPC (1) filed with the SEC a
joint proxy statement/prospectus on Form 424B4 for the
Proposed Max Amalgamation, (2) filed with the SEC a letter
to IPC shareholders soliciting proxies in support of the
Proposed Max Amalgamation and (3) commenced mailing both
documents to its shareholders.
On May 8, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC and commenced mailing definitive proxy
materials and proxy cards to IPC shareholders seeking proxies
from IPC shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 11, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC two amendments
to its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting
votes from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of
Validus Shares in connection with the acquisition of IPC.
On May 11 and 12, 2009, Validus application to expedite
the trial of the Bermuda Claim was heard by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda.
Also on May 12, 2009, in addition to filing the preliminary
copy of its proxy statement to solicit proxies for the proposed
court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus filed two preliminary proxy
statements with the SEC which, when filed in their definitive
forms, Validus intended to use to, respectively,
(1) solicit written requisitions from IPC shareholders to
compel the board of directors of IPC to call a special general
meeting of IPC shareholders and (2) solicit votes from IPC
shareholders to approve certain Validus proposals at that IPC
special general meeting.
Also on May 12, 2009, Validus filed a tender offer
statement on Schedule TO relating to the Exchange Offer, in
connection with which Validus also filed a preliminary
prospectus/offer to exchange on
Form S-4,
and Validus commenced the Exchange Offer.
On May 13, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda declined to
grant Validus request for an expedited trial on
Validus lawsuit against IPC, IPC Limited and Max related
to certain provisions of the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
On that same date, IPCs board of directors met to consider
Validus Exchange Offer. After careful consideration,
including a review of the terms and conditions of the Exchange
Offer in consultation with IPCs management and its
financial and legal advisors, and consistent with its fiduciary
duties under applicable law, IPCs board of directors
unanimously concluded that the Exchange Offer did not constitute
a superior proposal as defined in the Max Amalgamation Agreement
and reaffirmed its approval of the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
48
On that same date, IPC and Max announced that IPC and Max had
satisfied all of the regulatory filing, notification and
approval conditions required to complete the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 14, 2009, IPC filed with the SEC a
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
stating IPCs board of directors recommendation that
IPCs shareholders reject the Exchange Offer and not tender
their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
Also on May 14, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an
amendment to its Registration Statement on
Form S-4
in connection with the Exchange Offer.
Also on May 14, 2009, Validus filed an application to the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to convene a court-ordered IPC meeting
to approve the Scheme of Arrangement.
During this period, Validus management and its financial
advisors analyzed the pro forma effect of a revised offer to
acquire IPC on Validus financial position, earnings, book
value and rating agency capital position and discussed the
impact on Validus with its directors and its rating agencies.
Validus board of directors met on May 17, 2009 to
consider an amendment to the terms of the Initial Validus Offer
reflecting improved economic terms and containing an amendment
to the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement. Following
discussions among Validus directors, Validus board
of directors authorized and directed management to make a
revised offer to IPC with improved economic terms and with an
amendment to the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement.
On May 18, 2009, Validus delivered an offer letter to IPC
advising IPC of an amendment to the terms of the Initial Validus
Offer and containing an amendment to the proposed Validus
amalgamation agreement. Under its revised offer (the
Revised Validus Offer), Validus offered to deliver
1.1234 Validus Shares and $3.00 in cash, less any applicable
withholding tax and without interest, for each IPC Share. The
Revised Validus Offer represented a total value per IPC Share of
$30.14 based on closing prices as of May 15, 2009, the last
trading day prior to delivery of the letter containing the
Revised Validus Offer. The amendment to the proposed Validus
amalgamation agreement revised the terms of the Initial Validus
Offer (1) to permit IPC to declare and pay a one-time
dividend to the holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not
to exceed any reduction in the termination fee under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement and (2) to add a proviso to the
restrictions on the solicitation of acquisition proposals by IPC
to provide that IPC could, if the board of directors of IPC
concluded in good faith that such action was required in order
for IPCs directors to comply with their fiduciary duties
under applicable law and if IPC complied with certain
notification and confidentiality requirements, engage in
discussions with a third party relating to an acquisition
proposal for IPC.
Also on May 18, 2009, Validus amended the terms of the
Exchange Offer to reflect the economic terms of the Revised
Validus Offer.
Later on May 18, 2009, IPC issued a press release
announcing that its board of directors, along with its legal and
financial advisors, would carefully review the terms of the
Revised Validus Offer consistent with its fiduciary duties and
make a formal recommendation to IPC shareholders in accordance
therewith.
On May 19, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
to provide updated information with respect to the Revised
Validus Offer.
Also on May 19, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its
preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of the Validus
Shares in connection with the Revised Validus Offer.
On that same date and then again on May 20, 2009,
IPCs board of directors met to consider Validus
revised Exchange Offer (including the Revised Validus Offer). On
May 20, 2009, after careful consideration, including a
review of the terms and conditions of Validus revised
Exchange Offer in consultation with IPCs management and
its financial and legal advisors, and consistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law, IPCs board of
directors unanimously concluded that Validus revised
Exchange Offer did not constitute a superior proposal as defined
in the Max Amalgamation Agreement and was not in the best
interests of IPC and its shareholders, taken as a whole, and
recommended that IPC shareholders reject Validus revised
49
Exchange Offer and not tender their IPC Shares pursuant to the
revised Exchange Offer. Following IPCs board of directors
meeting, IPC advised Max of the determination of IPCs
board of directors that Validus revised Exchange Offer did
not constitute a superior proposal as defined in the Max
Amalgamation Agreement.
On May 21, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
stating IPCs board of directors recommendation that
IPC shareholders reject Validus revised Exchange Offer and
not tender their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the revised
Exchange Offer. On that same date, IPC sent a letter to Validus
detailing IPCs belief that Validus faced substantial
obstacles to completing its revised Exchange Offer.
Also on May 21, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an
amendment to its Registration Statement on
Form S-4
for the Exchange Offer, among other things, to include
additional disclosure regarding the revised economic terms of
the Exchange Offer.
On May 26, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC seeking proxies from Validus shareholders
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the
Revised Validus Offer. Validus commenced mailing definitive
proxy materials and proxy cards to Validus shareholders on or
about May 27, 2009.
Also on May 26, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an
amendment to its proxy statement to solicit proxies for the
proposed court-ordered IPC meeting.
IPCs board of directors met on May 26, May 31 and
June 4, 2009 to discuss, among other things, the status of
IPCs proxy solicitation process and Validus offer
and related litigation and public relations activities.
On May 29, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda determined
not to exercise its discretion to order a court-ordered IPC
meeting to approve the Scheme of Arrangement in advance of the
vote on the Proposed Max Amalgamation and until such time as it
was presented with evidence of IPC shareholder support for the
Scheme of Arrangement and dismissed Validus application
filed with the Court on May 14, 2009.
On June 1, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment to
its Registration Statement on
Form S-4
for the Exchange Offer.
Also on June 1, 2009, Glass Lewis & Co. and Proxy
Governance Inc. announced their recommendations that IPCs
shareholders vote for the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On June 2, 2009, RiskMetrics Group announced that it
recommended that IPC shareholders vote against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On June 4, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment to
its proxy statement to solicit proxies for the proposed
court-ordered meeting of IPC shareholders.
Also on June 4, 2009, Max proposed entering into a waiver
letter, subject to the approval of Maxs and IPCs
boards of directors, providing for certain additional special
dividends to be declared and paid by IPC in connection with the
Proposed Max Amalgamation.
IPCs board of directors met on June 4, 2009 to
consider the waiver letter. IPCs financial advisor
presented an analysis of the financial terms of the waiver
letter. IPCs directors then engaged in extensive review
and discussion. Following these discussions, IPCs board of
directors by unanimous vote of directors in attendance approved
the waiver letter and deemed the waiver letter and the
transactions contemplated thereby to be fair, advisable and in
the best interests of IPC and its shareholders as a whole.
IPCs board of directors also (1) declared a special,
one-time cash dividend of $1.50 per IPC Share outstanding, with
a record date of June 15, 2009 and a payment date to occur
one business day after the effective time of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation, conditional on the occurrence of the effective
time of the Proposed Max Amalgamation and subject to applicable
law and (2) announced it would declare a special, one-time
cash dividend of $1.00 per combined entity common share
outstanding, with a record date of the twenty-first day after
the date on which the effective time of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation would occur (or the first business day thereafter,
if such
50
twenty-first day was not a business day) and a payment date one
business day after the record date, the payment of which would
be conditioned on the occurrence of the effective time of the
Proposed Max Amalgamation and subject to applicable law.
Later on June 4, 2009, Max, IPC and IPC Limited executed
the waiver letter, and Max and IPC each issued a press release
announcing the execution of the waiver letter and the
declaration of the $1.50 and $1.00 special dividends described
above. On the same date, IPC and Max also filed a supplement to
their joint proxy statement/prospectus and mailed the revised
joint proxy statement/prospectus to the IPC and Max shareholders.
Validus board of directors met with Validus
management and financial and legal advisors on June 7, 2009
to consider an amendment (the Further Revised Validus
Offer) to the terms of the Revised Validus Offer
reflecting further improved economic terms and containing an
amendment to the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement.
Pursuant to the Further Revised Validus Offer, IPC shareholders
would receive 1.1234 Validus Shares and $3.75 in cash for each
IPC Share. At this meeting, Greenhill delivered its oral opinion
to the board of directors of Validus, subsequently confirmed in
writing, that, based upon and subject to the various limitations
and assumptions described in the written opinion, as of
June 7, 2009, the consideration pursuant to the Further
Revised Validus Offer was fair, from a financial point of view,
to Validus. Following discussions among Validus directors,
Validus board of directors authorized and directed
management to make a further revised offer to IPC with improved
economic terms and with an amendment to the proposed Validus
amalgamation agreement.
During this period, Validus management and its financial
advisors analyzed the pro forma effect of the Further Revised
Validus Offer to acquire IPC on Validus financial
position, earnings, book value and rating agency capital
position and discussed the impact on Validus with its directors
and its rating agencies.
On June 8, 2009, Validus delivered an offer letter to IPC
advising IPC of the increased economic terms of the Validus
offer under the Further Revised Validus Offer and containing an
amendment to the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement. The
Further Revised Validus Offer represented a total value per IPC
Share of $30.67 based on closing prices as of June 5, 2009,
the last trading day prior to delivery of the letter containing
the Further Revised Validus Offer. Also on June 8, 2009,
Validus amended the terms of the Exchange Offer to reflect the
economic terms of the Further Revised Validus Offer.
On June 9, 2009, the IPC board of directors met to review
and discuss the Further Revised Validus Offer.
Also on June 9, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
stating that IPCs board of directors recommended that IPC
shareholders reject the revised terms of the Exchange Offer and
not tender their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the Exchange
Offer.
Also on June 9, 2009, RiskMetrics Group reaffirmed its
previous recommendation that IPC shareholders vote against the
Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On June 10, 2009, Validus filed a supplement to its
definitive proxy statement with the SEC seeking proxies from IPC
shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
Also on June 10, 2009, Glass Lewis & Co. stated
that its original recommendation that IPC shareholders vote for
the Proposed Max Amalgamation remained unchanged.
On June 11, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the status of IPCs proxy solicitation process and
related litigation and public relations activities.
On June 12, 2009, Validus amended its Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
for the Exchange Offer and commenced mailing an amended
prospectus/offer to exchange that, among other things, reflected
the revised economic terms of the Exchange Offer.
Also on June 12, 2009, Validus filed a supplement to its
definitive proxy statement with the SEC seeking proxies from
Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares
in connection with the Further Revised Validus Offer.
51
Also on June 12, 2009, IPC held its annual general meeting
of shareholders. Representatives of Validus were in attendance
at the meeting. IPCs shareholders did not vote in favor of
certain matters, including the issuance of new IPC common
shares, required to consummate the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
However, each of the directors on the current IPC board of
directors was re-elected. Following the meeting, Max delivered a
letter to IPC terminating the Max Amalgamation Agreement in
accordance with its terms.
Following the termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement on
June 12, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to discuss
the IPC shareholder vote, the Further Revised Validus Offer and
the next steps for IPC. IPCs board of directors determined
that IPC should consider its strategic alternatives, including a
sale of IPC to Validus or another third party. At this meeting,
IPCs board of directors determined to enter into
discussions with Validus regarding the Further Revised Validus
Offer and instructed JPMorgan to contact third parties who might
be interested in acquiring IPC.
Following the IPC annual general meeting, representatives of
Validus also requested a meeting with representatives of IPC and
the board of directors of IPC, including Mr. Hammond.
During the evening of June 12, 2009, Mr. Noonan,
Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino, Validus Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Weale,
IPCs business development committee and representatives of
Greenhill and JPMorgan had a telephonic meeting during which
they discussed a potential framework for conducting mutual due
diligence and discussing the parties respective views
regarding a transaction between Validus and IPC.
On June 13, 2009, Greenhill delivered a draft of a
confidentiality agreement to JPMorgan as directed by
Validus management.
Also on June 13, 2009 and continuing on June 14, 2009,
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, special
counsel to Validus (Skadden, Arps), negotiated and
finalized the terms of the confidentiality agreement with
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. Also on June 13, 2009
and continuing on June 14, 2009, Validus and
IPCs respective financial advisors continued to discuss
the framework for considering a transaction between Validus and
IPC.
On June 14, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the potential transaction with Validus and other
potential parties. Following this IPC board of directors
meeting, JPMorgan, on behalf of IPC, contacted approximately 20
parties regarding their interest in a potential transaction with
IPC. During the weekend of June 13, 2009, IPC retained due
diligence advisors to assist it in its due diligence of Validus,
and IPC and Validus and their respective advisors provided each
other with initial due diligence requests and undertook
consensual mutual due diligence. This due diligence process
continued through the evening of July 8, 2009.
On June 15, 2009, IPC sent a letter to Validus, stating
that IPCs unaudited diluted book value per share as of
May 31, 2009 was approximately $35 and describing the
factors considered most important to IPCs board of
directors in any negotiated transaction with Validus. The
factors described in this letter to Validus included the
following: the value offered by Validus to IPC shareholders,
including appropriate protections of that value at the closing
of a transaction; certainty of closing a transaction and the
absence of any conditions in an amalgamation agreement relating
to the absence of catastrophe losses or other material adverse
changes that may occur on or after the signing of a definitive
amalgamation agreement or June 26, 2009 (the latter date
being the date on which the Exchange Offer was originally
scheduled to expire); satisfactory results from due diligence on
Validus; the expedited timing of a transaction; Validus making
appropriate provision to pay the termination fee under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement upon its becoming due; and IPC having the
flexibility to perform a market check between the signing of an
amalgamation agreement and the closing of the transaction. On
that same day, IPC issued a press release including the text of
the letter.
Also on June 15, 2009, Validus issued a press release
stating that Validus would seek to replace IPCs board of
directors if Validus was unable to reach a negotiated agreement
with IPCs board of directors in a timely fashion. Validus
also announced in the press release that it would continue to
pursue the Exchange Offer and the Scheme of Arrangement even as
Validus sought to reach a consensual amalgamation agreement with
IPCs board of directors.
52
Further on June 15, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its
preliminary proxy statement with the SEC to solicit requisitions
from IPC shareholders to compel the board of directors of IPC to
call a special general meeting of IPCs shareholders.
On June 16, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC to solicit requisitions from IPC
shareholders to compel the board of directors of IPC to call an
IPC special general meeting. Validus commenced mailing the
definitive proxy statement and proxy cards to IPC shareholders
on or about June 17, 2009.
On June 17, 2009, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
delivered to Skadden, Arps IPCs comments on the proposed
Validus amalgamation agreement. The comments reflected, among
other things, the issues that IPC had raised in its letter to
Validus dated June 15, 2009.
On June 18, 2009, IPC received a written offer from
Flagstone to acquire IPC.
Also on June 18, 2009, representatives of IPCs and
Validus respective legal and financial advisors met to
discuss the issues raised by IPCs comments on the proposed
Validus amalgamation agreement. At this meeting, representatives
of Validus indicated that Validus was unwilling to increase its
offer consideration, pay the termination fee under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement or provide IPC with additional
termination rights.
On June 19, 2009, Greenhill contacted JPMorgan to report
that Validus was willing to eliminate the proposed termination
right related to a decline in IPCs book value. Greenhill
reiterated Validus position that it was unwilling to
increase its offer consideration or to agree to a floating
exchange ratio or collar with respect to the share portion of
its offer consideration. Later that day, Skadden, Arps delivered
a revised proposed Validus amalgamation agreement to
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP reflecting, among other
matters, the terms that Greenhill had discussed with JPMorgan.
Between June 19 and July 8, 2009, Validus and
IPCs respective financial and legal advisors continued to
engage in discussions regarding the issues that had been
identified by Validus and IPC. During this time, Validus
management provided frequent updates to members of Validus
board of directors regarding the status of negotiations with IPC.
Between June 20 and July 8, 2009, the business development
committee of IPCs board of directors met several times to
discuss the offers presented by each of these counterparties,
and IPC engaged in negotiations regarding the terms of
amalgamation agreements with several of such parties.
On June 20, 2009, IPC entered into a confidentiality
agreement with, and began mutual due diligence on, Flagstone.
Also on this same date, IPC received an offer from an additional
party (Party M) to acquire IPC. Party M is a global
insurance and reinsurance company.
On June 21, IPCs board of directors met to discuss
the status of IPCs negotiations with Validus and the other
interested parties. At this meeting, JPMorgan provided
IPCs board of directors with a financial overview of the
offers from, and a business overview of, Validus and the other
interested parties.
On June 22, 2009, Validus issued a press release stating
that it had delivered a revised proposed Validus amalgamation
agreement to IPC that addressed certain concerns articulated by
IPC in its June 15, 2009 letter to Validus regarding a
possible negotiated transaction with Validus. The press release
further stated that Validus would not be revising the economic
terms of its offer, which Validus continued to believe provided
full and fair value for IPC Shares.
Also on June 22, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the status of IPCs negotiations with various
potential counterparties.
Also on June 22, 2009, Party M submitted a revised offer to
acquire IPC.
On June 23, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment
to its proxy statement to solicit proxies for the proposed
court-ordered IPC meeting in connection with the proposed Scheme
of Arrangement.
53
Also on June 23, 2009, IPC announced that while it was
negotiating with and engaging in mutual due diligence on
Validus, IPC had also received expressions of interest from
other parties and was engaged in discussions and negotiations
regarding the terms of potential business combination
transactions with Validus and such parties. IPC also stated that
it would continue its review of strategic alternatives after the
hurricane season if an appropriate transaction could not be
reached in the near future.
Also on June 23, 2009, IPC delivered a draft amalgamation
agreement to Flagstone.
Also on June 23, 2009, IPC and an additional party
(Party L), a large private equity firm, entered into
a confidentiality agreement and IPC began to provide Party L
with non-public information about IPC.
On June 23, 2009 and June 24, 2009, Validus and its
advisors and representatives of management of IPC and its
financial and legal advisors discussed the terms of the revised
proposed Validus amalgamation agreement. During these
discussions, IPC and its management reiterated IPCs
request that Validus increase its offer consideration and
fund IPCs payment of the termination fee pursuant to
the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
Also on June 24, 2009, IPC received an all-cash offer from
Party L to acquire IPC. Party Ls offer required that an
amalgamation agreement with IPC contain a financing condition
and give Party L the ability to terminate in the event of a
decline in IPCs book value or a hurricane resulting in a
material adverse effect on IPC.
Also on June 24, 2009, IPC delivered draft amalgamation
agreements to Party L and Party M and entered into negotiations
with Party L and Party M regarding a potential transaction. On
this same date, IPC entered into a confidentiality agreement
with, and provided access to due diligence materials to, an
additional party (Party N). Party N was a strategic
bidder, and larger than IPC, as measured by market
capitalization. IPC entered into discussions with Party N while
continuing its ongoing discussions with Party L, Party M,
Flagstone and Validus.
On June 25, 2009, RiskMetrics Group announced that, after
conducting a review of the proxy statement to solicit
requisitions from IPC shareholders to compel the board of
directors of IPC to call an IPC special general meeting, it
recommended that the IPC shareholders submit requisitions to
compel the board of directors of IPC to call an IPC special
general meeting.
Also on June 25, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its
preliminary proxy statement with the SEC seeking to solicit
votes from IPC shareholders to approve certain Validus proposals
at an IPC special general meeting.
Further, on June 25, 2009, Validus shareholders approved
the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the Further
Revised Validus Offer with the support of 98% of the shares
voted at the Validus special general meeting.
On June 26, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the status of IPCs negotiations with Validus and
the other interested parties.
Also on June 26, 2009, Messrs. Hammond and Noonan met
to discuss the status of the negotiations between IPC and
Validus and the terms of the Further Revised Validus Offer,
including the amount of the offer consideration and the payment
of a termination fee. Mr. Noonan also asked
Mr. Hammond whether he would be interested in being a
member of the board of directors of the combined entity
following an amalgamation between IPC and Validus;
Mr. Hammond declined on July 8, 2009.
On June 28, 2009, Flagstone submitted a revised offer to
IPCs board of directors.
On June 29, 2009, Validus announced that it had extended
its Exchange Offer for all of the outstanding IPC Shares to
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Monday, July 6,
2009, unless further extended.
Also on June 29, 2009, Validus also announced that it had
submitted to IPC requisitions from shareholders with aggregate
ownership of approximately 54% of the outstanding IPC Shares and
that, because Validus had submitted requisitions to IPC from
shareholders representing 10% or more of the issued and
54
outstanding IPC Shares, IPCs board of directors would be
required by Bermuda law to call a special general meeting of IPC
shareholders. Validus also announced that, at the special
general meeting, among other proposals to be considered, Validus
would seek to replace the board of directors of IPC.
Also on June 29, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an
amendment to its proxy statement to solicit proxies for the
proposed court-ordered IPC meeting.
Further, on June 29, 2009, Sullivan & Cromwell
LLP delivered to Skadden, Arps a revised draft of the proposed
Validus amalgamation agreement. During the period from
June 29, 2009 through July 8, 2009, IPC and Validus
and their advisors negotiated and reached agreement on
definitive transaction documentation.
On June 30, 2009, Party N submitted an offer to IPCs
board of directors to acquire IPC, pursuant to which the
consideration would have consisted 50% of cash and 50% of Party
N stock. Party Ns offer required that an amalgamation
agreement with IPC contain a financing condition and give Party
N the ability to terminate in the event of a decline in
IPCs book value or a hurricane resulting in a material
adverse effect on IPC.
On July 1, 2009, IPC announced that it had received notice
of the requisitions of a special general meeting of IPC
shareholders from Validus and that IPC would set a date for the
special meeting after consulting with its advisors.
Also on July 1, 2009, Flagstone announced that it had made
an offer to the board of directors of IPC to acquire all of the
outstanding IPC Shares, pursuant to which Flagstone would
exchange $5.50 in cash and 2.6380 Flagstone common shares for
each IPC Share. The implied value of the Flagstone Offer was
$33.62 per IPC Share and represented a 21.1% premium to the
trading price of IPC Shares (calculated based on the closing
price of Flagstone shares times the number of Flagstone shares
exchanged for each IPC Share, plus the cash component of the
proposed consideration), based on closing prices of Flagstone
shares and IPC Shares on July 1, 2009.
Also on July 1, 2009, Party M delivered a revised offer to
IPCs board of directors. Party Ms revised offer
contemplated consideration of $30.00 in cash in exchange for
each IPC Share, with no financing condition, but would have
required IPC to pay a $50 million inducement fee upon
entering into the amalgamation agreement and, among other
things, would have restricted IPC from paying a dividend in the
third quarter of 2009.
On July 2, 2009, Party M delivered an executed
confidentiality agreement to IPC.
Also on July 2, 2009, Validus announced that it remained
committed to the economic terms of its outstanding offer to
acquire IPC, which Validus believed represented a full and fair
value for IPC Shares, and that Validus had proposed changes to
other terms of its offer in order to be responsive to concerns
expressed by the board of directors of IPC. Validus also
restated its belief that a combination with IPC would create
significant long-term value for the shareholders of both Validus
and IPC by creating a well-diversified, market-leading carrier
in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets.
Also on July 2, 2009, IPC announced that the board of
directors of IPC, together with its financial and legal
advisors, was reviewing Flagstones offer and would issue a
response in due course. IPC additionally stated that the board
of directors of IPC was working diligently towards its goal of
maximizing value for IPCs shareholders and that IPC was
continuing to negotiate with other parties, including Flagstone
and Validus, to obtain the best outcome for IPC shareholders.
Also on July 2, 2009, IPC contacted Wachovia to begin
discussions regarding amending IPCs credit facility to
permit IPC to enter into and consummate an amalgamation
agreement with Validus or another party without potentially
causing any default under the credit facility. Between July 2
and July 8, 2009, IPC negotiated the terms of the amendment
to IPCs credit facility.
55
On July 3, 2009, IPCs board of directors met to
discuss the status of IPCs negotiations with Validus and
the other interested parties. At this meeting, JPMorgan provided
IPCs board of directors with certain analyses of the
financial terms of the offers from Validus and the other
interested parties that had submitted offers.
Also on July 3, 2009, JPMorgan contacted Greenhill to
request certain revisions to the proposed Validus amalgamation
agreement, including that Validus fund IPCs payment
of the termination fee under the Max Amalgamation Agreement upon
the execution by IPC of an amalgamation agreement with Validus.
JPMorgan reiterated IPCs board of directors request
that Validus increase the consideration to be paid in connection
with the proposed amalgamation. During this discussion, JPMorgan
reported to Greenhill that the board of directors of IPC
intended to meet to reach a decision regarding Validus and
other offers for IPC on the afternoon of July 6, 2009 with
the intention of announcing a transaction no later than
July 8, 2009.
On July 4, 2009, Validus management met with its
legal and financial advisors to discuss the outstanding issues
with IPC, including IPCs request that Validus
fund IPCs payment of the termination fee under the
Max Amalgamation Agreement. Thereafter, Validus management
authorized Greenhill to offer to JPMorgan that Validus would be
willing to agree to such a provision so long as such amount
would be repaid to Validus in the event that the proposed
Validus amalgamation agreement was terminated for a reason other
than a material breach by Validus of the amalgamation agreement,
the issuance of a permanent injunction or order prohibiting an
amalgamation or if the amalgamation had failed to have been
consummated by March 31, 2010, so long as no competing
acquisition proposal for IPC had been made. Later that day,
Greenhill reported to JPMorgan the terms of Validus
proposal and reiterated that Validus was unwilling to increase
the consideration that it would pay in connection with the
amalgamation.
From July 4 to July 6, 2009, JPMorgan contacted Validus,
Flagstone and Party M to request that they submit their best and
final offers by close of business on July 6, 2009, and it
engaged in discussions with the various parties.
On July 5, 2009, Validus board of directors met to
consider revisions to the terms of Validus offer regarding
outstanding issues that had been identified by Validus and IPC.
Following discussions among Validus directors,
Validus board of directors authorized and directed
Greenhill to discuss with JPMorgan revised terms regarding
Validus offer.
Also on July 5, 2009, Greenhill engaged in additional
discussions with JPMorgan regarding outstanding issues that had
been identified by Validus and IPC and Greenhill reported to
JPMorgan the revised terms that had been authorized by
Validus board of directors earlier that day.
On July 6, 2009, Mr. Noonan sent a letter to the board
of directors of IPC reiterating the terms of Validus
offer, including the accommodations and price increases that had
been offered to IPC since March 31, 2009 and discussing the
combined companys short- and long-term prospects.
Also on July 6, 2009, Validus announced that it had
confirmed to the board of directors of IPC that its offer for
IPC was its best and final offer. Validus also stated that
Validus and IPC had been in discussions on a range of issues in
the hopes of reaching a consensual transaction and that Validus
believed that its offer represented a full and fair value for
IPC Shares. Validus further stated that it had made a number of
changes to the terms of its offer to respond to concerns
expressed by the board of directors of IPC, including providing
IPC shareholders with the certainty of a transaction that was
not subject to termination in the event of major catastrophe
losses. In this press release, Validus also announced that it
had extended its Exchange Offer for all of the outstanding IPC
Shares to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on Monday,
July 13, 2009, unless further extended.
Also on July 6, 2009, Skadden, Arps sent a revised proposed
Validus amalgamation agreement to Sullivan & Cromwell
LLP.
Also on July 6, 2009, Validus continued to analyze the
Flagstone offer and discussed a potential reconstitution of the
Validus offer with the rating agencies, including
A.M. Best. Validus continued these conversations with the
rating agencies, including A.M. Best, on July 7, 2009.
Based on these conversations,
56
Validus management concluded that a reconstitution of the
Further Improved Validus offer was feasible within the capital
requirements of its current ratings categories.
Also on July 6, 2009, assisted by its financial advisor and
legal counsel, the business development committee of IPCs
board of directors met to discuss Validus and
Flagstones offers.
On the same day, IPC performed further due diligence with
respect to Flagstones financing arrangements for the
proposed transaction.
On July 7, 2009, JPMorgan had further discussions with
Greenhill regarding the terms of Validus offer. During
these discussions, JPMorgan indicated that IPCs board
would likely not accept Validus offer if Validus was
unwilling to improve the financial terms of its offer. JPMorgan
also reiterated IPCs board of directors previous
request that Validus qualified sponsor
shareholders enter into voting agreements, and the further
request that such shareholders enter into lockup agreements, in
connection with the amalgamation. Additionally, IPCs and
Validus legal advisors engaged in negotiations regarding
the circumstances under which IPC would be required to reimburse
Validus advancement of the $50 million termination
fee payable by IPC under the Max Amalgamation Agreement in the
event of termination of the proposed Validus amalgamation
agreement, and the date after which either party would be
entitled to terminate the agreement, for which Validus had
proposed March 31, 2010.
Also on July 7, 2009, Validus management and board of
directors and legal and financial advisors met to discuss
Validus offer for IPC and how it could be modified to
address certain of the concerns that had been identified by
IPCs board of directors. Following these discussions,
Validus board of directors authorized and approved, and
directed Greenhill to discuss with JPMorgan, a potential
reconstitution of Validus offer to reflect an exchange
ratio of 0.9727 Validus Shares per IPC Share and $7.50 in cash,
reflecting a value of $31.73 as of March 30, 2009, the last
day trading prior to Validus announcement of its initial
offer for IPC and reflecting the same value, based on share
prices as of such date, as its offer of 1.1234 Validus Shares
and $3.75 in cash per IPC Share. The reconstituted offer
represented a total value per IPC Share of $30.09, based on
closing prices as of July 6, 2009, the last trading day
prior to this offer being considered. In addition, Validus
board of directors authorized Greenhill to convey to JPMorgan
that certain of Validus shareholders would be willing to
enter into voting agreements as appropriate and would consider
lock up agreements. At this meeting, Validus board of
directors met to review and approve the final terms of the
proposed Validus amalgamation agreement. At that meeting
Validus board of directors also received updates from
Validus management and advisors on due diligence regarding
IPC and the shareholder and regulatory notifications and
approvals that would be required in connection with the
transaction and the possible timeframe for obtaining such
approvals. Following these discussions, and extensive review and
discussion among Validus directors, including
consideration of the factors described under
Reasons Why Validus Board of Directors Recommends
Approval of the Share Issuance, Validus board of
directors unanimously approved the proposed Validus amalgamation
agreement with IPC and the transactions contemplated thereby and
declared the amalgamation and other transactions contemplated by
the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement to be fair to,
advisable and in the best interests of Validus. Validus
board of directors authorized and directed management to sign
the definitive Amalgamation Agreement and resolved that a
meeting of the Validus voting common shareholders be convened to
consider and approve the Amalgamation and the transactions
contemplated thereby.
On the evening of July 7, 2009, Greenhill advised JPMorgan
that, under the revised terms, Validus was considering
reconstituting its offer to increase the cash component in order
to be responsive to other potential offers that IPC may have
received and with a higher cash component than the Further
Revised Validus Offer and to decrease the stock component, while
maintaining the same overall value based on share prices as of
March 30, 2009, the last trading day prior to Validus
announcement of the Initial Validus Offer. Greenhill advised
JPMorgan that, under the reconstituted terms Validus was
considering, the holders of IPC Shares would receive 0.9727
Validus Shares and $7.50 in cash, less any applicable
withholding tax and without interest, and cash in lieu of
fractional shares, in exchange for each IPC Share they hold,
unless they exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Bermuda law.
In addition, Greenhill advised JPMorgan regarding the voting
agreements and potential lock up agreements as directed by
Validus board of directors.
57
Also on the evening of July 7, 2009, IPCs board of
directors met to discuss the offers from interested parties to
acquire or amalgamate with IPC.
Early in the morning of July 8, 2009 JPMorgan advised
Greenhill that the board of directors of IPC was willing to work
toward a definitive amalgamation agreement with Validus, subject
to the approval of the board of directors of IPC, based on
Validus revised proposal of 0.9727 Validus Shares and
$7.50 in cash in exchange for each IPC share, and subject to
resolving remaining open issues in the proposed Validus
amalgamation agreement.
On July 8, 2009, Validus and IPCs legal
advisors exchanged a draft shareholder voting agreement and
shareholder lockup agreement, in each case for certain of
Validus shareholders. During that day, Validus received
feedback from those shareholders indicating a willingness to
enter into voting agreements, but they expressed concern
regarding certain terms, including the duration, of the proposed
lockups. Additionally, during that day the respective
managements and representatives of Validus and IPC continued
discussions regarding outstanding issues. Skadden, Arps and
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP exchanged drafts of the
transaction documents during the course of that day reflecting
their clients respective positions. During the course of
these negotiations, the parties agreed that lockup agreements
from Validus shareholders would not be required as part of
the transaction.
Also on July 8, 2009, Greenhill delivered its oral opinion
to the board of directors of Validus, subsequently confirmed in
writing, that, based upon and subject to the various limitations
and assumptions described in the written opinion, as of such
date, the exchange ratio of 0.9727 Validus Shares and $7.50 in
cash for each IPC Share pursuant to the proposed Validus
amalgamation agreement was fair, from a financial point of view,
to Validus.
IPCs board of directors met on July 8, 2009. JPMorgan
presented certain analyses of the financial terms of the
reconstituted Validus proposal. IPCs management also
updated IPCs directors on the results of negotiations with
the banks in IPCs credit facility and described the terms
of the amendment that would need to be entered into if IPC
intended to execute an amalgamation agreement with Validus.
JPMorgan delivered to IPCs board of directors its oral
opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing, that as of such date
and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions stated
in that opinion, the amalgamation consideration to be paid to
the holders of IPC Shares in the proposed Amalgamation was fair,
from a financial point of view, to such holders (other than
Validus and its affiliates), as described in
Opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Financial Advisor
to IPCs Board. Following these discussions and
extensive review and discussion among IPCs directors,
including consideration of the factors described
under Reasons Why IPCs Board of Directors
Recommends Approval of the Amalgamation and the IPC Bye-law
Amendment, IPCs board of directors unanimously
approved the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement with
Validus and the transactions contemplated thereby and declared
the amalgamation and other transactions contemplated in the
proposed Validus amalgamation agreement, including the
amendments proposed to IPCs credit facility, to be
advisable and in the best interests of IPC. IPCs board of
directors resolved that a special general meeting of the IPC
shareholders be convened to consider approving the bye-law
amendments and the proposed Validus amalgamation agreement and
that IPCs management sign the proposed Validus
amalgamation agreement.
Also on July 8, 2009, Flagstone submitted a revised offer
to acquire IPC (the Revised Flagstone Offer). The
Revised Flagstone Offer did not provide for an increase in the
implied value of Flagstones previous offer, but proposed
an increase in the cash component of the consideration by $1.00
per share and a corresponding reduction in the exchange ratio.
Specifically, under the Revised Flagstone Offer, each IPC Share
would have been converted into the right to receive
(1) $6.50 in cash and (2) 2.535 Flagstone common
shares. IPCs board of directors met a second time on
July 8, 2009, to discuss the revised Validus proposal, the
Revised Flagstone Offer and the other interested parties
offers. At this meeting, IPCs board of directors received
a presentation from JPMorgan regarding certain financial terms
of the Revised Flagstone Offer and, for the reasons described
under Reasons Why IPCs Board of Directors
Recommends Approval of the Amalgamation and the IPC Bye-law
Amendment, determined that the Revised Flagstone Offer did
not change IPCs board of directors previous
decisions regarding the revised Validus proposal and the
proposed Validus amalgamation agreement.
58
During the evening of July 8, 2009, IPC entered into an
amendment to its credit facility and received the written
consent of its lenders under the credit facility to enter into
and consummate an amalgamation with Validus.
In the early morning of July 9, 2009, the parties executed
the Amalgamation Agreement. On July 9, 2009, Validus and
IPC each issued a press release announcing that they had entered
into the Amalgamation Agreement. Promptly following the
execution of the Amalgamation Agreement, IPC discontinued its
discussions with all other parties. Also that morning, Validus
announced that it would terminate the Exchange Offer and
promptly return all IPC Shares previously tendered to Validus
and that it would terminate its solicitation efforts in
connection with its other previously announced alternative steps
to complete a transaction with IPC, including the Scheme of
Arrangement and the calling of a special meeting of IPC
shareholders. Later that morning, Validus and IPC held a joint
conference call for investors to discuss the Amalgamation
Agreement.
Also on July 9, 2009, IPC paid Max the $50 million
termination fee pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, and
Validus advanced to IPC $50 million, pursuant to the
Amalgamation Agreement between Validus and IPC.
Also on July 9, 2009, Flagstone announced that, following
the execution of the Amalgamation Agreement, it was ending its
proposal to acquire IPC.
Reasons
Why Validus Board of Directors Recommends Approval of the
Share Issuance
By approving the Share Issuance, you will be enabling Validus to
issue the Validus Shares necessary to effect the Amalgamation.
Validus board of directors believes that the Amalgamation
represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit
that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the
global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the
Amalgamation would allow Validus shareholders to benefit from
the superior growth potential of a combined company that would
be a leading carrier in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance
and insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality
diversification in profitable business lines. In reaching these
conclusions and in determining that the Amalgamation Agreement,
the Amalgamation and the Share Issuance are fair, advisable and
in the best interests of Validus, and in recommending the
approval of the Share Issuance, Validus board of directors
consulted with Validus management as well as legal and
financial advisors and considered a number of factors. The
factors included, but were not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus board of directors analysis and
understanding of the business, operations, financial
performance, financial condition, earnings and future prospects
of Validus and its assessment, based on such analysis and
understanding, that Validus will have:
|
|
|
|
|
|
lines of business concentrated in short-tail lines where pricing
momentum is strongest;
|
|
|
|
enhanced market position and client penetration that will make
Validus a more significant player in short-tail reinsurance
placements globally;
|
|
|
|
ability to add a significant amount of short-tail reinsurance
premium to Validus existing Bermuda infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
global and diversified operating platforms, with offices and
underwriting facilities in Bermuda, at Lloyds in London,
Dublin, Singapore, New York and Miami;
|
|
|
|
enhanced size and scope, with approximately $3.7 billion in
GAAP capitalization and approximately $3.4 billion in GAAP
shareholders equity, enabling the company to capture
highly attractive market opportunities in the global insurance
and reinsurance markets;
|
|
|
|
continuing financial flexibility, with total leverage including
hybrid securities of only 8.3%; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to reduce costs associated with running two
separate public companies, including IPCs NASDAQ listing
fees, transfer agent fees, legal and accounting fees related to
SEC filings and shareholder mailings, printing and mailing
expenses for periodic reports and proxy statements, annual
meeting expenses and other investor relations related expenses,
which expenses Validus believes are
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
duplicative and can be eliminated if Validus and IPC combine
resulting in these expenses for the combined company
representing a smaller portion of combined revenues;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus will experience accretion to its book
value and tangible book value per share as a result of the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus would remain within its stated limitations
of reinsurance aggregates by exposure zone;
|
|
|
|
Validus board of directors understanding of the
business, operations, and financial condition of IPC;
|
|
|
|
the ongoing representation by all of Validus existing
directors on Validus board of directors after the
Amalgamation, and the fact that Validus senior management
will continue to manage Validus;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of Greenhill, delivered to Validus board of
directors on July 8, 2009, subsequently confirmed in
writing, to the effect that, based upon and subject to the
various limitations and assumptions described in the written
opinion, as of the date thereof, the consideration pursuant to
the proposed Amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of
view, to Validus, as described in Opinion of
Greenhill & Co., LLC, Financial Advisor to
Validus Board;
|
|
|
|
Validus board of directors belief, based on
discussion with Validus management and reports of
discussions with A.M. Best, that Validus had sufficient
surplus capital available to pay a significant portion of the
consideration in cash;
|
|
|
|
the fact that no external financing is required for the
transaction; as well as the fact that IPC had already secured an
amendment to its existing syndicated credit facility that
permits IPC to effect the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the fact that IPCs board of directors was willing to agree
to a consensual transaction on the basis of the terms set forth
in the Amalgamation Agreement, therefore providing for the
benefits of a consensual transaction, including greater
certainty and the possibility of an expedited consummation of
the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the transaction will only occur if it is approved
by a majority of the votes cast on the relevant proposal at the
IPC special meeting or, if the amendment to the IPC bye-laws
permitting the shareholders of IPC to approve an amalgamation by
a majority vote is not approved and adopted by the shareholders
of IPC, a vote of three-fourths of the votes cast on the
relevant proposal at the IPC special meeting; and
|
|
|
|
the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, including that the
amalgamation consideration consisting of 0.9727 Validus Shares
and $7.50 in cash, and the other terms and conditions of the
Amalgamation Agreement, including the termination provisions,
resulted from extensive arms-length negotiations between Validus
and its advisors, on the one hand, and IPC and its advisors, on
the other hand;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement that the Share Issuance be approved by holders
of a majority of the outstanding Validus Shares casting votes at
the Validus special meeting, as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Conditions to the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the requirement that Validus advance to IPC $50.0 million
following execution of the Amalgamation Agreement in respect of
the Max Termination Fee, and that IPC would only be required to
reimburse such amount following termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement under certain specified circumstances, as described
under The Amalgamation Agreement Repayment or
Retention of the Reimbursement Amount;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Amalgamation Agreement allows Validus
board of directors to change or withdraw its recommendation of
the Amalgamation and the Share Issuance, provided that following
such a change, IPC may terminate the Amalgamation Agreement and
receive a termination fee;
|
|
|
|
the fact that, subject to compliance with certain obligations
under the Amalgamation Agreement, IPCs board of directors
may change or withdraw its recommendation of the Amalgamation,
provided that following such a change, Validus may terminate the
Amalgamation Agreement and receive a
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
termination fee and reimbursement of the $50 million paid
by Validus to IPC at signing of the Amalgamation Agreement in
respect of the Max Termination Fee;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that consummation of the Amalgamation is conditioned
upon Validus securing an amendment to its existing syndicated
credit facility, or that Validus otherwise obtain replacement
financing;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus may be required to pay IPC a termination
fee of $16 million, as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Effects of Termination; Remedies in
certain circumstances; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that neither Validus nor IPC has the right to terminate
the Amalgamation Agreement based on a significant decline in
book value of the other between signing and closing of the
Amalgamation Agreement.
|
Validus board of directors considered other factors in
making its determination and recommendation, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of Validus business
imposed by the Amalgamation Agreement prior to the consummation
of the Amalgamation, requiring Validus to conduct its business
in the ordinary course, subject to specific limitations, which
may delay or prevent Validus from undertaking business
opportunities that may arise pending completion of the
Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the IPC shareholders and the Validus
shareholders may not react favorably to the Amalgamation, and
the execution risk and additional costs that would be required
to complete the Amalgamation as a result of any legal actions
brought by Validus shareholders or legal actions and appraisal
actions brought by IPC shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the effect of the announcement of the Amalgamation on
Validus share price if Validus shareholders do not view
the Amalgamation positively or if the Amalgamation is not
completed;
|
|
|
|
the potential disruption to Validus business that could
result from the announcement and pursuit of the Amalgamation,
including the diversion of management and employee attention;
|
|
|
|
that Validus may wish to purchase retrocessional protection for
the 2009 wind season and the cost and availability of that
protection;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the Amalgamation might not be completed due
to the failure to obtain required shareholder approvals, the
occurrence of a material adverse effect on either companys
business, or the inability to obtain required credit facility
consents;
|
|
|
|
the risk that A.M. Best, S&P or Moodys might
lower the ratings of Validus or any of its reinsurance
subsidiaries following the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the fact that certain of Validus shareholders who own in
the aggregate approximately 38% of the outstanding Validus
Shares have agreed to vote their shares in favor of the Share
Issuance; and
|
|
|
|
the risks described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
under the section entitled Risk Factors.
|
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by Validus board of directors is not intended
to be exhaustive, but is believed to include material positive
and potentially material adverse factors considered by
Validus board of directors. In view of the variety of
factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the
Amalgamation Agreement, the Share Issuance and the other
transactions contemplated by the Amalgamation, Validus
board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not,
quantify or otherwise assign specific weights to the factors
considered in reaching its determination and recommendation. In
addition, each of the members of Validus board of
directors may have given differing weights to different factors.
Validus board of directors believed that the positive
factors discussed above outweighed the negative factors
discussed above, especially after giving weight to the
likelihood of occurrence.
61
Reasons
Why IPCs Board of Directors Recommends Approval of the
Amalgamation and the IPC
Bye-law
Amendment
In reaching its decision to approve the Amalgamation Agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby and the IPC bye-law
amendment, and its determination that each of the Amalgamation
and the IPC bye-law amendment is in the best interests of IPC
and represents the best available alternative for IPCs
shareholders, IPCs board of directors consulted with
IPCs management and legal and financial advisors and
considered a number of factors. These included, but were not
limited to, the factors described below.
Changed circumstances of Validus
offer. IPCs board of directors reached its
determination to recommend Validus final offer in the
light of the changed circumstances following the termination of
the Max Amalgamation Agreement including, but not limited to,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus had previously increased the overall value of its offer,
from 1.2037 Validus Shares for each IPC Share in the Initial
Validus Offer on March 31, 2009, to 1.1234 Validus shares
plus $3.00 in cash for each IPC Share in the Revised Validus
Offer made on May 18, 2009, followed by 1.1234 Validus
Shares and $3.75 in cash for each IPC Share under the Further
Revised Validus Offer made on June 8, 2009;
|
|
|
|
Validus final offer doubled the cash component of the
consideration, from $3.75 to $7.50 (with no financing condition,
as was the case with Validus previous offers with a cash
component) and reduced the stock component from 1.1234 Validus
Shares to 0.9727 Validus Shares, decreasing the risk for
IPCs shareholders related to any decrease in Validus
share price between signing and closing of the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the Amalgamation Agreement provides greater certainty and more
favorable terms and conditions for IPCs shareholders than
did the Initial Validus Offer as a result of changes to the
terms and conditions originally proposed by Validus following
extensive negotiations between IPC and Validus, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the elimination of provisions that would have increased the risk
that the Amalgamation would not be consummated, including a
provision that would have permitted Validus to terminate the
Amalgamation Agreement upon the occurrence of certain changes in
IPCs book value, such as charges arising from hurricanes;
|
|
|
|
an agreement by Validus to advance to IPC at the time of
entering into the Amalgamation Agreement an amount equal to the
$50 million termination fee payable by IPC to Max under the
Max Amalgamation Agreement (subject to reimbursement by IPC in
certain circumstances, as described under The Amalgamation
Agreement Max Termination Fee and The
Amalgamation Agreement Repayment or Retention of the
Reimbursement Amount);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the elimination of provisions that otherwise would have
permitted Validus (if it chose to do so) to (1) issue an
amount of additional equity prior to the consummation of the
Amalgamation in a manner that would reasonably be expected to be
adverse in a material respect to IPC shareholders or
(2) amend its organizational documents in a manner that
would reasonably be expected to be adverse in a material respect
to IPC shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the agreement by Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, Vestar Capital
Partners, and New Mountain Capital, LLC, which collectively
owned approximately 38% of Validus outstanding voting
common shares as of July 27, 2009, to vote in favor of the
issuance of Validus shares in connection with the transaction,
thereby further increasing certainty of the consummation of the
Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
whereas the objective of IPCs board of directors
previously was to achieve a strategic combination that would
provide and protect long-term value by diversifying IPC beyond
its monoline property catastrophe business model, following the
termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement the board of
directors of IPC placed an increased emphasis on obtaining a
transaction with the best available value for IPCs
shareholders, with due regard to certainty, the expeditious
consummation of a transaction and other terms and
conditions; and
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
the opinion received by IPCs board of directors from
JPMorgan, delivered to IPCs board of directors orally on
July 8, 2009 (and later confirmed in writing), to the
effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the
factors and assumptions stated in that opinion, the amalgamation
consideration to be paid to the holders of IPC Shares in the
proposed Amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of view,
to such holders (other than Validus and its affiliates), as
described in Opinion of J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., Financial Advisor to IPCs Board.
|
Alternatives to the Amalgamation. Following
the failure by IPCs shareholders to approve the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, IPCs board of directors again
engaged in an extensive and thorough analysis of alternatives,
including maintaining IPC on a stand-alone basis (either as a
monoline property catastrophe business or as an organically
diversified business), pursuing an amalgamation or acquisition
transaction with another party (either for cash, stock or a
combination thereof), and effecting a run-off. IPCs board
of directors determined, based on its analysis, that the
Amalgamation with Validus (on the final,
agreed-upon
transaction terms) was the best alternative available to IPC, in
consideration of each alternatives potential to provide
value to IPCs shareholders, with due regard to certainty,
the expeditious consummation of a transaction and other terms
and conditions.
IPCs board of directors concluded that maintaining IPC on
a stand-alone basis was not the most desirable alternative based
on factors including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors that continuing on a
stand-alone basis until the end of the hurricane season would
increase risk and uncertainty for IPC due to the possibility
that, as a result of the strategic uncertainty regarding IPC, a
significant hurricane could cause IPC to be unable to replenish
its capital, potentially impeding IPCs ability to maintain
its business and its credit ratings, which could also have a
negative impact on the obtainable value in any future sale
process;
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors that IPCs
limited management resources and lack of a permanent chief
executive officer after June 30, 2009 as a result of the
Proposed Max Amalgamation not being consummated, made IPCs
stand-alone prospects more challenging, particularly in
implementing an organic growth strategy;
|
|
|
|
the fact that a run-off of IPC during the hurricane season
carried high risk, because IPC would continue to have
significant exposure to catastrophe losses during the first year
of run-off, as well as uncertainty regarding the impact on
IPCs share price and the potential reaction of rating
agencies, clients and employees, and the resulting uncertain
timing of dividend payments due to concerns of regulators;
|
|
|
|
the risk that a future easing of the capital markets could cause
new competitors to enter the property catastrophe insurance
market; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that the uncertainty arising from Validus
unsolicited offers over time could have an adverse impact on
IPCs business operations, and Validus had indicated that
it did not intend to terminate its offers.
|
IPCs board of directors determined that the Amalgamation
with Validus (on the final,
agreed-upon
transaction terms) was more desirable than the transactions
proposed by the other parties with which IPC engaged in
negotiations following the termination of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement, based on factors including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that IPCs board of directors conducted a thorough
and intensive process that included negotiations with, due
diligence on, and offers from multiple parties, in order to
determine whether another transaction could offer better value
(with due regard to certainty, the expeditious consummation of a
transaction and other important terms and conditions) (see
The Amalgamation Background), and IPCs
board of directors made a determination that Validus offer
represented the best available value (with due regard to
certainty, the expeditious consummation of a transaction and
other important terms and conditions);
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors that the aggregate
consideration offered by Validus, including the amount and type
of consideration, the future value creation potential, the
anticipated timing of signing
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
and closing, the likelihood of consummating the transaction, and
the other terms and conditions of its offer, were superior,
taken as a whole, to the offers of IPCs other potential
counterparties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the consideration to be paid by Validus for each IPC common
share represented a 24.9% premium based on the closing prices of
IPC and Validus on March 30, 2009, the last trading day
before the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer, and a 6.8%
premium based on the closing prices of IPC and Validus on
July 8, 2009, the last trading day before the announcement
of the Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
IPCs board of directors assessment of the potential
for future value creation to shareholders of the combined entity;
|
|
|
|
IPCs board of directors assessment, based on their
analysis and understanding of the financial performance,
financial condition, earnings and future prospects of the
combined entity, that the combined entity will have enhanced
size and scope, with shareholders equity of approximately
$3.4 billion (as of March 31, 2009), which is expected
to lead to improved financial strength and enable the combined
entity to capture highly attractive market opportunities in the
global insurance and reinsurance markets;
|
|
|
|
the fact that IPC shareholders will own approximately 38% of the
combined entity (based on fully diluted shares as of
March 31, 2009), enabling IPC shareholders to participate
in the upside of owning shares in a larger, stronger and better
capitalized underwriting platform;
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors that the Validus
transaction offered a high level of certainty, in consideration
of factors including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCs board of directors belief that the conditions
to closing the Amalgamation as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Conditions to the Amalgamation are
capable of being satisfied, thus increasing the likelihood the
Amalgamation will be consummated;
|
|
|
|
the fact that no external financing is required for the
Amalgamation, thus increasing the likelihood that the
Amalgamation will be consummated, and the fact that IPC has
already secured an amendment to its existing credit facility
that permits it to effect the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
IPCs board of directors belief, based on advice from
outside legal counsel, that no required regulatory approvals
were likely to delay or impair the parties ability to
consummate the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the reduction in uncertainty and risk to IPC resulting from
entering into a transaction before the height of the hurricane
season, combined with the fact that Validus does not have the
right to terminate the Amalgamation in connection with any
catastrophe losses suffered by IPC; and
|
|
|
|
the understanding of IPCs board of directors that the
Amalgamation could close sooner than a transaction with any
other potential counterparty could have, because Validus had
already made significant progress in its filings with the SEC in
relation to its proposed acquisition of IPC;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the overwhelming approval by Validus shareholders of the
proposal to approve the issuance of Validus shares in connection
with Validus unsolicited offer to acquire IPC and the
existence of the voting agreements described above with respect
to approximately 38% of Validus outstanding voting common
shares as of July 27, 2009;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that a future easing of the capital markets could
reduce the interest of potential acquirers that viewed IPC as a
source of capital;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Amalgamation Agreement permits IPC to continue
to declare and pay regular quarterly cash dividends at
historical levels, whereas the transaction proposed by Party M
would not have permitted a dividend;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Amalgamation Agreement allows IPCs board
of directors to change or withdraw its recommendation of the
Amalgamation Agreement in the event that IPC receives a superior
proposal
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
from a third party, provided that following such a change
Validus may terminate the Amalgamation Agreement and receive a
termination fee and reimbursement of the Max Termination Fee
from IPC, as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
in determining that Validus offer represented the best
available alternative, notwithstanding that the terms of the
Revised Flagstone Offer represented a higher implied value for
IPCs Shares based on share prices immediately prior to the
announcement of each offer, IPCs board of directors also
considered factors including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors, based on its
assessment of various business, operational and financial
factors, that an amalgamation with Flagstone would offer less
future value creation potential with higher risk for IPCs
shareholders than the Amalgamation with Validus; among the
factors assessed by the IPC board of directors in coming to this
view was an illustrative analysis of the values of the Validus
offer and the Revised Flagstone Offer that was prepared by
JPMorgan using a dividend discount model and was based on
IPCs management projections, Validus management
projections (as adjusted as directed by IPC management),
Flagstones management projections (as adjusted as directed
by IPC management), a combined business plan prepared by Validus
management (as adjusted as directed by IPC management), a
combined business plan prepared by Flagstone management (as
adjusted as directed by IPC management) and certain other
assumptions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Revised Flagstone Offer delivered on July 8,
2009 did not increase the total amount of consideration payable
to IPC shareholders over Flagstones previous offer, as
measured, for each Flagstone offer, as the market price of
Flagstones shares on the date of the Revised Flagstone
Offer times the number of Flagstone shares to be exchanged for
each IPC Share, plus the cash component of the proposed
consideration;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors, based on the advice
of IPC management, that there could be some financing risk
associated with the cash component of the Revised Flagstone
Offer; specifically, IPCs board of directors considered
that, due to the correlation of IPCs and Flagstones
property catastrophe reinsurance businesses, a combination of
IPC and Flagstone might not result in the creation of excess
capital of an amount sufficient to finance the cash portion of
the Revised Flagstone Offer, thereby exposing the combined
company to the possibility that it might need to obtain
additional capital during the hurricane season, which capital
could be costly or difficult to obtain;
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPCs board of directors understanding (1) based on
publicly available information and the advice of its proxy
solicitor, that IPCs shareholder base includes a large
number of arbitrageurs that would be likely to sell the
Flagstone common shares or Validus Shares they receive in a
business combination transaction shortly after consummation of
the transaction, and (2) that, because IPC shareholders would
represent a larger percentage of the combined Flagstone/IPC
shareholder base than the combined Validus/IPC shareholder base,
the selling pressure on Flagstones common shares resulting
from such sales by arbitrageurs in a Flagstone/IPC combination
would have been likely to be greater than the selling pressure
on Validus Shares in a Validus/IPC combination, resulting in a
greater risk of a relative post-closing decline in the market
value of Flagstone common shares as compared to the Validus
Shares;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors, based on the advice
of IPC management, that upon the announcement of any agreement
between IPC and Flagstone, there was a significant risk that
Flagstones share price would decrease, thus decreasing the
value of the consideration to be received by IPCs
shareholders in any transaction with Flagstone, by a greater
percentage than the price of Validus Shares would decrease upon
the announcement of an agreement between IPC and Validus, due to
the fact that Flagstone would have to issue a greater number of
shares to consummate an amalgamation, relative to the number of
Flagstones currently outstanding shares, compared to the
number of Validus Shares to be issued in the Amalgamation,
relative to the number of Validus currently outstanding
shares.
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors that the combined
IPC/Validus strategic plan constituted a stronger model than the
proposed IPC/Flagstone business model, in consideration of the
fact that a combined Validus/IPC would have a larger capital
base than a combined Flagstone/IPC and IPCs board of
directors believed that a combined Validus/IPC would therefore
have less costly access to capital from the equity markets if
the need arose in the future;
|
|
|
|
the belief of IPCs board of directors that the share
consideration offered by Validus was superior to that offered by
Flagstone; and
|
|
|
|
the potential risk associated with Flagstones ability to
finance the cash portion of the Revised Flagstone Offer, and the
impact that such payment could have on the combined
companys ratings and access to future financing.
|
Other factors relating to the
Amalgamation. IPCs board of directors also
considered the following factors in making its determination and
recommendation, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that delaying a transaction could allow IPC to
obtain greater value, if the hurricane season is mild;
|
|
|
|
the concerns of IPCs board of directors expressed
previously with respect to Validus unsolicited offer to
acquire IPC and the Max Amalgamation Agreement, including the
substantially correlated catastrophe exposure that would result
from the Amalgamation with Validus; the volatility of
Validus share price; the risk of the rating agencies
giving the combined entity lower-than-anticipated ratings
following the Amalgamation due to the correlated catastrophe
exposure or if, for example, a material, unanticipated
catastrophe occurs; the risks and costs to IPC if the
Amalgamation is not completed, including the potential effect on
the market price for IPC common shares, its operating results,
and its ability to attract and retain key personnel; and the
possibility that the IPC shareholders may not react favorably to
the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the concern expressed by ratings agencies, including
A.M. Best, that the Amalgamation with Validus may result in
a combined entity with a heightened risk profile due to its
significant property catastrophe business, exacerbated by the
anticipated timing of the closing of the Amalgamation during the
hurricane season;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the Amalgamation Agreement does not restrict
Validus from soliciting, considering or responding to
third-party acquisition proposals and changing or withdrawing
its recommendation of the Amalgamation Agreement, provided that
following such a change IPC may terminate the Amalgamation
Agreement and receive a termination fee, as described in The
Amalgamation Agreement Termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the risk, particularly in light of IPCs and Validus
overlapping risk concentration, that the increased cash
component of the consideration offered by Validus could deplete
the combined entitys capital;
|
|
|
|
the fact that IPC may become required in certain circumstances
to pay Validus a termination fee of $16 million, and
potentially to reimburse Validus for the $50 million
advanced in respect of the Max Termination Fee, as described
under The Amalgamation Agreement Termination of
the Amalgamation Agreement, whereas if IPC had entered into
a transaction with a different counterparty, IPC would not be
required to pay or reimburse Validus, Max or any other party for
the Max Termination Fee;
|
|
|
|
the fact that certain IPC shareholders may be required to pay
taxes on the $7.50 per share cash consideration pursuant to the
Amalgamation, as described under Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences;
|
|
|
|
the risk that Validus may fail to satisfy the requirement that
Validus obtain consents from its lenders, or enter into
replacement financing arrangements, before consummating the
Amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus has made no commitment to retain
IPCs employees, which may negatively impact IPCs
ability to retain employees prior to the consummation of the
Amalgamation.
|
66
The foregoing discussion is not intended to be exhaustive, but
is believed to include material positive and potentially
material adverse factors considered by IPCs board of
directors. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the Amalgamation Agreement and
the bye-law amendments and the other transactions contemplated
by the Amalgamation Agreement, IPCs board of directors did
not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise
assign specific weights to the factors considered in reaching
its determination and recommendation. In addition, each of the
members of IPCs board of directors may have given
differing weights to different factors. IPCs board of
directors believed that the positive factors discussed above
outweighed the negative factors discussed above, especially
after giving weight to the likelihood of their occurrence.
Opinion
of Greenhill & Co., LLC, Financial Advisor to Validus
Board
Validus board of directors received an oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, from Greenhill that, based
upon and subject to the various limitations and assumptions
described in the written opinion, as of July 8, 2009, the
consideration to be paid by Validus pursuant to the proposed
Amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Validus.
The full text of the written opinion of Greenhill, dated
July 8, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limits on the opinion and the review undertaken in connection
with rendering the opinion, is attached as Annex C to this
joint proxy
statement/prospectus
and is incorporated herein by reference. Greenhills
opinion is not a recommendation as to how Validus shareholders
should vote with respect to the issuance of Validus Shares
pursuant to the proposed Amalgamation or any other matter. The
summary of Greenhills opinion that is set forth below is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
opinion. Validus shareholders are urged to read the opinion in
its entirety.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Greenhill, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft, dated July 8, 2009, of the Agreement and
Plan of Amalgamation (the Draft Amalgamation
Agreement);
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements of IPC
and Validus;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other publicly available business and financial
information relating to IPC and Validus that Greenhill deemed
relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain information, including financial forecasts and
projections and other financial and operating data concerning
Validus and IPC prepared by the management of Validus and IPC;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and present operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Validus with senior executives of
Validus;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and present operations and financial
condition and the prospects of IPC with senior executives of IPC;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the historical market prices and trading activity for
IPC Shares and Validus Shares and analyzed their implied
valuation multiples;
|
|
|
|
compared the value of the amalgamation consideration with that
received in certain publicly available transactions that
Greenhill deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the value of the amalgamation consideration with the
trading valuations of certain publicly traded companies that
Greenhill deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the value of the amalgamation consideration with the
relative contribution of IPC to the pro forma combined company
based on a number of metrics that Greenhill deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Validus and its legal advisors and
representatives of IPC and its legal and financial
advisors; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as Greenhill deemed appropriate.
|
In giving its opinion, Greenhill assumed and relied upon,
without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness
of the information publicly available, supplied or otherwise
made available to it by
67
representatives and management of Validus and IPC for the
purposes of its opinion. Greenhill further relied upon the
assurances of the representatives and management of Validus and
IPC, as applicable, that they were not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or
misleading. With respect to the financial forecasts and
projections and other data that were furnished or otherwise
provided to it, including the forecasts concerning IPC prepared
by IPC management that Validus board of directors directed
Greenhill to utilize for purposes of its analysis, Greenhill
assumed that such financial forecasts and projections and other
data were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best
currently available estimates and good faith judgments of the
management of Validus and IPC, as applicable, as to those
matters, and Greenhill relied upon such financial forecasts and
projections and other data in arriving at its opinion. Greenhill
expressed no opinion with respect to such financial forecasts
and projections and other data or the assumptions upon which
they were based. Greenhill did not make any independent
valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of IPC or
Validus, nor was Greenhill furnished with any such appraisals.
Greenhill assumed, with the consent of Validus board of
directors, that the Amalgamation will be treated as a
reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes.
Greenhill assumed that the Amalgamation will be consummated in
accordance with the terms set forth in the Amalgamation
Agreement, which Greenhill further assumed will be identical in
all material respects to the Draft Amalgamation Agreement that
Greenhill reviewed, and without amendment or waiver of any
material terms or conditions set forth in the Amalgamation
Agreement. Greenhill further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory and other consents, approvals and
waivers necessary for the consummation of the Amalgamation will
be obtained without any adverse effect on IPC, Validus, the
Amalgamation or the contemplated benefits of the Amalgamation
meaningful to Greenhills analysis. Greenhills
opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and
other conditions as in effect on, and the information made
available to it as of, July 8, 2009. It should be
understood that subsequent developments may affect
Greenhills opinion, and Greenhill does not have any
obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion.
Greenhills opinion was for the information of
Validus board of directors and was not intended to be and
is not a recommendation as to how Validus shareholders should
vote with respect to the issuance of Validus common shares
pursuant to the Amalgamation or as to whether the Validus
shareholders should take any other action at any meeting of the
Validus shareholders convened in connection with the
Amalgamation or any other matter. Greenhills opinion did
not address the underlying business decision of Validus to
engage in the Amalgamation or the relative merits of the
Amalgamation as compared to any other alternative strategies
that might exist for Validus, and as such was not intended to be
and did not constitute a recommendation to Validus board
of directors as to whether they should approve the proposed
Amalgamation, the documents in connection therewith or any
related matters. Greenhill did not express an opinion as to any
aspect of the proposed Amalgamation, other than the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to Validus of the consideration
to be paid by Validus pursuant to the Amalgamation. In
particular, Greenhill did not express any opinion as to the
prices at which Validus Shares will trade at any future time.
Greenhill further did not express any opinion with respect to
the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors or employees of Validus, or any class of such persons
relative to the consideration pursuant to the Amalgamation or
with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.
Summary
of Greenhills Financial Analyses
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
provided by Greenhill to Validus board of directors in
connection with rendering its opinion described above. The
summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by Greenhill, nor does the
order of analyses as set forth below represent the relative
importance or weight given to those analyses by Greenhill. Some
of the summaries of the financial analyses include information
presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together
with the full text of each summary and are not alone a complete
description of Greenhills financial analyses.
68
Exchange
Ratio Analysis
Greenhill calculated the historical range and average of
exchange ratios (the price of an IPC Share divided by the price
of a Validus Share). Using the daily closing prices of Validus
Shares and IPC Shares, the low, high and average exchange ratios
for the three-month, six-month and twelve-month periods ending
on July 7, 2009 are set forth in the table below. The
percent premium that the consideration pursuant to the
Amalgamation represents over the average exchange ratios for
each period is set forth in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Average
|
|
High
|
|
Premium(1)
|
|
July 7, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Previous 3 Months
|
|
|
1.080
|
x
|
|
|
1.160
|
x
|
|
|
1.280
|
x
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
Previous 6 Months
|
|
|
0.930
|
x
|
|
|
1.136
|
x
|
|
|
1.280
|
x
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
Previous 12 Months
|
|
|
0.930
|
x
|
|
|
1.219
|
x
|
|
|
1.560
|
x
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as the premium of $7.50 plus 0.9727 times the average
daily closing price of Validus Shares in the period over the
average daily closing price of IPC Shares in the period. |
Transaction
Multiple Analysis
Greenhill calculated the multiple of the assumed offer value per
IPC Share to several operating metrics for calendar years 2009
and 2010, including estimated earnings per share based upon mean
estimates obtained from Institutional Brokers Estimate System
(IBES). The calculations were based upon IPC Shares
outstanding as of March 31, 2009 on a fully diluted basis.
This analysis indicated the following multiples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Value
|
|
2009E P/E
|
|
2010E P/E
|
|
Price/Book
|
|
Price/Tangible
|
per IPC Share(1)
|
|
IBES Estimate
|
|
IBES Estimate
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
Book Value(1)
|
|
$29.73
|
|
|
6.1x
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
x
|
|
|
0.91
|
x
|
|
|
0.91
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as $7.50 plus 0.9727 times the closing price of
Validus common shares on July 7, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Book value per IPC Share is calculated as of March 31, 2009
and is based upon 55,948,821 IPC Shares outstanding, 526,000
options outstanding and 493,415 unvested restricted stock units,
restricted common shares and performance share units. |
Dividend
Discount Analysis
Greenhill performed a dividend discount analysis of IPC to
determine a range of implied present values per IPC Share
assuming that IPC continues to operate as a stand-alone company.
This range was determined by adding the present value of the
estimated future excess capital of IPC available to be
dividended in each period and the present value of the estimated
terminal value of IPC Shares. To estimate present values,
Greenhill discounted the estimated future excess capital of IPC
available to be dividended in each period through 2013 and the
estimated terminal value of IPC Shares by a range of discount
rates that take into account risk, the opportunity cost of
capital, expected returns and other appropriate factors.
In connection with this analysis, Greenhill utilized
5-year net
income and revenue projections based on IBES estimates for 2009
and 2010, extrapolated by Greenhill to 2013 (the IBES
Case). In calculating the extrapolations, Greenhill
assumed, among other things, a 4.0% return on total assets, with
projections based on an assumed total assets to total equity
ratio of 1.30x, and a net premiums written to total equity ratio
of 0.20x. In addition, with respect to the IBES Case, Greenhill
assumed that 493,000 unvested restricted shares of IPC would
vest at the end of 2009, and that IPC would continue to pay an
aggregate annual dividend equal to $0.88 per IPC Share
throughout the
5-year
projection period. Greenhill also utilized, at the direction of
Validus board of directors,
5-year
financial projections prepared by IPC management presenting the
IPC organic growth case for 2009 through 2013 (the IPC
Case) and assumed a net premiums written to total equity
ratio of 0.20x.
69
Greenhill then, with respect to each of the IBES Case and the
IPC Case, calculated a range of implied present values per IPC
Share by applying:
|
|
|
|
|
a range of terminal multiples of 0.70x to 0.90x to year 2013
estimated book value of IPC Shares; and
|
|
|
|
a range of discount rates of 9.0% to 11.0% to each of the
estimated future excess capital of IPC available to be
dividended in each period through 2013 and the estimated
terminal value of IPC Shares.
|
This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values per
IPC Share from $26.67 to $36.09 in the IBES Case and from $23.35
to $33.27 in the IPC Case.
Comparable
Company Analysis
Greenhill reviewed and compared specific financial multiples,
ratios and operating statistics of IPC to corresponding
financial multiples, ratios and operating statistics for
selected publicly traded reinsurance companies and compared the
trading value of IPC to the trading values of the selected
companies. The companies chosen by Greenhill were:
|
|
|
|
|
ACE Limited
|
|
|
|
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings Ltd
|
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Everest Re Group, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Max Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Munich Re Group
|
|
|
|
Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
|
|
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd.
|
|
|
|
TransAtlantic Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
XL Capital Ltd
|
For each of the companies identified above, Greenhill calculated
and compared various financial multiples, ratios and operating
statistics based on publicly available financial data and
closing share prices as of July 7, 2009.
Although none of the companies are directly comparable to IPC
(other than IPC), Greenhill selected these companies because
they had publicly traded equity securities and were deemed to be
similar to IPC in one or more respects including the nature of
their business, size, diversification, financial performance and
geographic
70
concentration. This analysis indicated the following mean and
median trading multiples for the selected companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price/
|
|
Price/
|
|
Price/EPS
|
|
Price/EPS
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.89
|
x
|
|
|
0.98
|
x
|
|
|
6.6
|
x
|
|
|
6.3
|
x
|
Median
|
|
|
0.87
|
x
|
|
|
0.95
|
x
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
5.9
|
x
|
Greenhill then applied a range of selected multiples derived
from the selected companies to corresponding financial data of
IPC for the corresponding periods. This analysis indicated the
following ranges of implied equity value and per share value for
IPC:
|
|
|
|
|
Statistic
|
|
Implied Per Share Value(2)
|
|
2009E Net Income(1)
|
|
$
|
26.79 - $34.09
|
|
2010E Net Income(1)
|
|
$
|
26.30 - $33.47
|
|
Book Value
|
|
$
|
27.85 - $31.13
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
$
|
27.85 - $31.13
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimates are mean IBES. |
|
(2) |
|
Based upon 55,948,821 IPC Shares outstanding, 526,000 options
outstanding and 493,000 unvested restricted stock units,
restricted common shares and performance share units. |
Precedent
Transaction Analysis
Global Reinsurance Transactions. Using
publicly available information, Greenhill analyzed selected
merger and acquisition transactions with transaction values over
$100 million in the global reinsurance industry beginning
in February 1999. The following table identifies the global
reinsurance transactions reviewed by Greenhill in this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Target
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
July 5, 2009
|
|
PARIS RE Holdings Limited
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.
|
August 4, 2008
|
|
CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
Tower Group, Inc.
|
January 7, 2008
|
|
Helicon Re Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.
|
November 5, 2007
|
|
PXRE Reinsurance Company
|
|
TAWA plc
|
December 9, 2003
|
|
ABB Insurance Holding Sweden AB (Sirius International Group)
|
|
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.
|
October 24, 2003
|
|
ERC Life Reinsurance Corporation
|
|
Scottish Re Group Limited
|
December 19, 1999
|
|
LaSalle Re Holdings Limited
|
|
Trenwick Group Inc.
|
August 15, 1999
|
|
Terra Nova (Bermuda) Holdings Ltd.
|
|
Markel Corporation
|
June 21, 1999
|
|
Chartwell Re Corporation
|
|
Trenwick Group Inc.
|
May 27, 1999
|
|
Capital Re Corporation
|
|
ACE Limited
|
February 15, 1999
|
|
NAC Re Corp.
|
|
XL Capital Ltd.
|
For the selected global reinsurance transactions, to the extent
this information was available, Greenhill calculated the
multiples implied by each transaction relative to a number of
metrics, including the target companys book value and
tangible book value at the time of such transaction. This
analysis indicated the following mean and median multiples for
the selected global reinsurance transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Multiples
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.98
|
x
|
|
|
1.03
|
x
|
Median
|
|
|
0.96
|
x
|
|
|
1.01
|
x
|
71
Greenhill then applied a range of selected multiples derived
from the selected global reinsurance transactions to
corresponding financial data of IPC for the corresponding date.
This analysis indicated the following ranges of implied equity
value and per share value for IPC:
|
|
|
|
|
Statistic
|
|
Implied Per Share Value(1)
|
|
Book Value
|
|
$
|
29.49 - $39.32
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
$
|
29.49 - $39.32
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based upon 55,948,821 IPC Shares outstanding, 526,000 options
outstanding and 493,000 unvested restricted stock units,
restricted common shares and performance share units. |
Premiums Paid Analysis. Greenhill
analyzed the premiums paid in
stock-for-stock
and part-cash, part-stock acquisition transactions since May
2004 with a transaction value of between $500 million and
$5 billion. Greenhill calculated, for each of these
transactions, the premium of the transaction consideration over
the historical closing prices for each of the
one-day,
one-week and one-month periods prior to announcement of such
transaction. Greenhill then applied the medians and ranges of
such premiums, shown in the table below, to corresponding
closing prices per IPC Share, using the day immediately prior to
the announcement of IPCs proposed merger with Max as the
corresponding announcement date. This analysis indicated a range
of implied values per IPC Share shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per
|
Timing
|
|
Premium Range
|
|
Share Value
|
|
One Day Prior
|
|
|
14.0% - 25.0%
|
|
|
|
$28.97 - $31.76
|
|
One Week Prior
|
|
|
16.0% - 25.0%
|
|
|
|
$32.48 - $35.00
|
|
One Month Prior
|
|
|
18.0% - 25.0%
|
|
|
|
$30.28 - $32.08
|
|
It should be noted that no transaction utilized in the analyses
above is identical to the proposed Amalgamation. A complete
analysis involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of the companies involved in these transactions
and other factors that could affect the premiums and multiples
in these transactions to which the proposed Amalgamation is
being compared.
Book
Value Growth Analysis
Using IPC book value as of March 31, 2009, based on
IPCs public filings, and mean Bloomberg estimates of IPC
book value through the end of year 2009, Greenhill calculated
the implied price to book value multiple that the assumed offer
value per IPC Share would represent at the end of each quarter
set forth in the table below. This analysis indicated that due
to IPCs projected book value growth, the implied price to
book value multiple would decrease over time, as illustrated
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
Per Share Value(1)
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
$29.73
|
|
|
0.907
|
x
|
|
|
0.871
|
x
|
|
|
0.859
|
x
|
|
|
0.832
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as $7.50 plus 0.9727 times the closing price of
Validus common shares on July 7, 2009. |
Pro
Forma Combined Company Analysis
Greenhill analyzed certain financial data on a pro forma basis
for IPC and Validus as a combined company following the
Amalgamation. Greenhill based its analyses on publicly available
information and information and projections provided by Validus
as described above.
Greenhill compared, among other things, the book value per
share, tangible book value per share and projected earnings per
share for Validus on a standalone basis and for the pro forma
combined company. Greenhill then analyzed the accretive or
dilutive effects of the Amalgamation to Validus shareholders for
the
72
assumed level of total amalgamation consideration per IPC Share.
This analysis indicated the following accretive or dilutive
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Total
|
|
Accretion/(Dilution)
|
|
|
Consideration Per
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
|
IPC Share(1)
|
|
2009E EPS
|
|
2010E EPS
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
$29.73
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated as $7.50 plus 0.9727 times the closing price of
Validus common shares on July 7, 2009. |
In addition, Greenhill analyzed the pro forma combined
companys business lines, balance sheet and capital base
relative to each of Validus and IPC on a standalone basis.
Further, Greenhill conducted a comparison regarding the pro
forma combined companys equity as of March 31, 2009
relative to certain of its peers and each of Validus and IPC on
a standalone basis. Greenhill also performed a contribution
analysis of the relative contributions of each of Validus and
IPC with respect to the pro forma combined companys
balance sheet, gross premiums written and other items.
The summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by Greenhill, but
describes, in summary form, the material analyses that Greenhill
conducted in connection with rendering its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is
not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, Greenhill did not
attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors it
considered and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor, considered in isolation,
supported or failed to support its opinion. Rather, Greenhill
considered the totality of the factors and analyses performed in
determining its opinion. Accordingly, the summary set forth
above and the analyses of Greenhill must be considered as a
whole and selecting portions thereof, without considering all of
its analyses, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying Greenhills analyses and opinion. Greenhill
based its analyses on assumptions that it deemed reasonable,
including assumptions concerning general business and economic
conditions and industry-specific factors. Analyses based on
forecasts or projections of future results are inherently
uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors or events
beyond the control of the parties or their advisors.
Accordingly, Greenhills analyses are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or actual future results that might
be achieved, which values may be higher or lower than those
indicated. Moreover, Greenhills analyses are not and do
not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the
prices at which businesses actually could be bought or sold. In
addition, no company (other than IPC) or transaction used in
Greenhills analysis as a comparison is directly comparable
to IPC, Validus or the contemplated transaction. Because these
analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon
numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or
their respective advisors, none of Validus or Greenhill or any
other person assumes responsibility if future results are
materially different from those forecasts or projections.
Greenhills opinion and analyses were provided to
Validus board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the proposed Amalgamation and were among many
factors considered by Validus board of directors in
evaluating the proposed Amalgamation. See The
Amalgamation Reasons Why Validus Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Share Issuance. While
Greenhill provided advice to Validus during this process, it did
not recommend any specific amount of consideration to Validus or
Validus board of directors or that any specific amount of
consideration would constitute the only appropriate
consideration for the proposed Amalgamation. Neither
Greenhills opinion nor its analyses should be viewed as
determinative of the consideration or the views of Validus
board of directors with respect to the proposed Amalgamation.
Engagement
of Greenhill
Validus selected Greenhill as its financial advisor in
connection with the proposed Amalgamation based on its
qualifications and expertise in providing financial advice to
acquirors, target companies and their respective boards of
directors in merger and acquisition transactions. Greenhill will
receive an aggregate fee of $10.0 million for its services
rendered in connection with the Amalgamation, $2.75 million
of which has already been paid and $7.25 million of which
is contingent on the consummation of the Amalgamation or
73
entry into a definitive agreement that subsequently results in a
transaction. In addition, Validus will reimburse Greenhill for
its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of its
legal counsel. Validus has also agreed to indemnify Greenhill
and its affiliates for certain liabilities arising out of its
engagement, including liabilities under the U.S. federal
securities laws.
During the two years preceding the date of its opinion,
Greenhill was not previously engaged by, did not perform any
services for, and did not receive any compensation from, Validus
or any other parties to the Amalgamation Agreement (other than
any amounts that were paid to Greenhill under its engagement as
financial advisor in connection with the proposed Amalgamation).
As of the date of Greenhills opinion, four merchant
banking funds affiliated with Greenhill owned an aggregate of
2,571,427 Validus Shares, and certain employees of Greenhill and
its affiliates had interests in one or more of such funds.
Opinion
of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Financial Advisor to
IPCs Board
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated February 29, 2008,
IPC retained JPMorgan as its financial advisor in connection
with IPCs analysis and consideration of various strategic
alternatives. Pursuant to an engagement letter dated
January 15, 2009, IPC retained JPMorgan as its financial
advisor to, among other things, evaluate whether the
amalgamation consideration to be paid to the holders of IPC
Shares was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders
(other than Validus and its affiliates).
At the meeting of IPCs board of directors on July 8,
2009, JPMorgan rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed
in writing on the same day, to IPCs board of directors
that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors
and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the amalgamation
consideration to be paid to the holders of the IPC Shares in the
proposed Amalgamation was fair, from a financial point of view,
to such holders (other than Validus and its affiliates). No
limitations were imposed by IPCs board of directors upon
JPMorgan with respect to the investigations made or procedures
followed by it in rendering its opinions. The issuance of
JPMorgans opinion was approved by a fairness opinion
committee of JPMorgan on July 8, 2009.
The full text of the written opinion of JPMorgan dated
July 8, 2009, which sets forth the assumptions made,
matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is
attached as Annex D to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference.
IPCs shareholders are urged to read the opinion in its
entirety. JPMorgans written opinion is addressed to
IPCs board of directors, addresses only the fairness, from
a financial point of view, to the holders of the IPC Shares
(other than Validus and its affiliates) of the amalgamation
consideration to be paid to such holders in the Amalgamation and
does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of IPC
as to how such shareholder should vote at the IPC special
meeting. The summary of the opinion of JPMorgan set forth in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, JPMorgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated July 8, 2009, of the Amalgamation
Agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning IPC and Validus and the industries in
which they operate;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the Amalgamation with
the publicly available financial terms of certain transactions
involving companies JPMorgan deemed relevant and the
consideration paid for such companies
|
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of IPC and
Validus with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies JPMorgan deemed relevant and reviewed the
current and historical market prices of IPC Shares and Validus
Shares and certain publicly traded securities of such other
companies;
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial analyses and forecasts provided by
the management of IPC
and/or
Validus, or prepared as directed by the management of IPC,
including (a) certain internal financial analyses and
forecasts prepared by the management of IPC, or as directed by
the management of IPC, relating to IPCs business,
(b) certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by the management of Validus relating to Validus
business as adjusted as directed by the management of IPC and
(c) certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
relating to the combined business of IPC and Validus prepared by
the management of Validus and adjusted as directed by the
management of IPC; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as JPMorgan deemed appropriate
for the purposes of its opinion.
|
JPMorgan also held discussions with certain members of the
management of IPC and Validus with respect to certain aspects of
the Amalgamation, and the past and current business operations
of IPC and Validus, the financial condition and future prospects
and operations of IPC and Validus, the effects of the
Amalgamation on the financial condition and future prospects of
IPC and Validus, and certain other matters JPMorgan believed
necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.
JPMorgan relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness
of all information that was publicly available or was furnished
to or discussed with JPMorgan by IPC or Validus or otherwise
reviewed by or for JPMorgan and JPMorgan has not independently
verified (nor has it assumed responsibility or liability for
independently verifying) any such information or its accuracy or
completeness. JPMorgan did not conduct any valuation or
appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor did JPMorgan
evaluate the solvency of IPC or Validus under any state, federal
or other laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar
matters. JPMorgan was not provided with any valuation or
appraisal of any assets or liabilities on which it was permitted
to or did rely. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to it or prepared as directed by the management of IPC
or derived from any of the foregoing, JPMorgan assumed that they
were reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the
best currently available estimates and judgments by management
as to the expected future results of operations and financial
condition of IPC, Validus and the combined entity. JPMorgan
expressed no view as to analyses or forecasts referred to herein
or the assumptions on which they were based. JPMorgan also
assumed that the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement will be tax-free to
each of IPC, Validus, and their respective subsidiaries for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, will have the purchase
accounting consequences described in discussions with, and
materials furnished to JPMorgan by, representatives of IPC and
Validus and will be consummated as described in the Amalgamation
Agreement, and that the definitive Amalgamation Agreement would
not differ in any material respect from the draft thereof
provided to JPMorgan. JPMorgan also assumed that the
representations and warranties made by IPC and Validus in the
Amalgamation Agreement and the related agreements are and will
be true and correct in all ways material to its analysis.
JPMorgan is not a legal, regulatory, actuarial or tax expert and
relied on the assessments made by advisors to IPC with respect
to such issues. Except as would not be material to its analysis,
JPMorgan further assumed that all governmental, regulatory or
other consents and approvals necessary for the closing of the
Amalgamation will be obtained without any adverse effect on IPC
or Validus or on the contemplated benefits of the Amalgamation.
JPMorgans opinion is based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to JPMorgan as of, the date of such opinion. Subsequent
developments may affect JPMorgans opinion, and JPMorgan
does not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm such
opinion. JPMorgans opinion is limited to the fairness,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of the IPC Shares
(other than Validus and its affiliates) of the amalgamation
consideration to be paid to such holders in the proposed
Amalgamation, and JPMorgan has expressed no opinion as to the
fairness of the Amalgamation to, or any consideration to be paid
in connection therewith to, the holders of any other class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of IPC or as to
the underlying decision by IPC to engage in the Amalgamation.
Furthermore, JPMorgan expressed no opinion with respect to the
amount or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors,
or employees of any party to the Amalgamation, or any class of
such persons relative to the amalgamation consideration to be
paid to the holders of the IPC Shares in the Amalgamation or
with respect to the fairness of any such compensation. JPMorgan
expressed no opinion as to the price at which IPCs common
shares or Validus common shares will trade at any future
time.
75
The terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, including the
consideration payable, were determined through negotiations
between IPC and Validus and were approved by both boards of
directors. The decision to enter into the Amalgamation Agreement
was solely that of IPCs board of directors. The JPMorgan
opinion and financial analyses were only one of the many factors
considered by IPC in its evaluation of the Amalgamation and
should not be viewed as determinative of the views of IPCs
board of directors or IPCs management with respect to the
Amalgamation or the amalgamation consideration.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
JPMorgan employed generally accepted valuation methods in
reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of the material
financial analyses utilized by JPMorgan in connection with
providing its opinion and does not purport to be a complete
description of the analysis underlying JPMorgans opinion.
Some of the summaries of financial analyses are presented in
tabular format. To fully understand the financial analyses, the
tables should be read together with the text of each summary.
Considering the data set forth in the table without considering
the narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of the financial analyses.
Projections
In performing its analysis of IPC, JPMorgan relied on
(1) certain financial analyses and forecasts prepared by
the management of IPC, or as directed by the management of IPC,
reflecting IPC continuing as a monoline property catastrophe
company, which were prepared in connection with the proposed
Amalgamation for the period 2009 to 2018 and are referred to in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the monoline
case, (2) certain financial analyses and forecasts
prepared by the management of IPC, or as directed by the
management of IPC, reflecting IPCs expansion into
additional lines of business and geographic locations including
a Lloyds platform, a crop reinsurance quota share business
and certain specialty reinsurance areas, which were prepared in
connection with the proposed Amalgamation for the period 2009 to
2018 and are referred to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as the organic growth case, and
(3) certain internal analyses and forecasts prepared by the
management of IPC, or as directed by the management of IPC,
reflecting a run-off of IPCs business, which were prepared
in connection with the proposed Amalgamation for the period 2009
to 2012 and are referred to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as the run-off case.
In performing its analysis of Validus, JPMorgan relied on
certain internal financial analyses and forecasts for Validus
prepared by the management of Validus and adjusted as directed
by the management of IPC, which analyses and forecasts were
prepared in connection with the proposed Amalgamation for the
period 2009 to 2018 and are referred to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as the adjusted Validus standalone
case.
In performing its analysis of the combined entity, JPMorgan
relied on certain internal financial analyses and forecasts
relating to the combined entity prepared by the management of
Validus, and adjusted as directed by the management of IPC,
which analyses and forecasts were prepared in connection with
the proposed Amalgamation for the period 2009 to 2018 and are
referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the
adjusted Validus combined case.
The projections relied upon by JPMorgan for IPC, Validus and the
combined entity were provided by the management of IPC
and/or
Validus in connection with the proposed Amalgamation, or
prepared as directed by the management of IPC in connection with
the proposed Amalgamation. Neither IPC nor Validus publicly
discloses internal management projections of the type relied
upon by JPMorgan in connection with JPMorgans analysis of
the Amalgamation, and such projections were not prepared with a
view toward public disclosure. These projections were based on
numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain
and may be beyond the control of management, including, without
limitation, factors related to general economic and competitive
conditions, prevailing interest rates and catastrophic events.
Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from those
set forth in such projections.
Summary
of JPMorgans Financial Analyses
Historical Exchange Ratio Analysis. JPMorgan
reviewed the per share daily closing market price of IPC Shares
and Validus Shares over the previous year and calculated the
implied historical exchange ratios during
76
this period by dividing the daily closing prices per share of
IPC Shares by those of Validus Shares. JPMorgan compared the
maximum and minimum implied exchange ratio over the period to
1.3009x, the exchange ratio for a theoretical all-stock
transaction with implied value equal to the aggregate
consideration in the proposed Amalgamation as of July 7,
2009 (the equivalent all-stock exchange ratio),
which was calculated as the price implied by Validus offer
as of July 7, 2009 ($29.73) divided by Validus share
price as of the same date ($22.85). The analysis resulted in an
historical high implied exchange ratio of 1.556x and an
historical low implied exchange ratio of 0.930x, in each case
for the period from Validus initial public offering on
July 25, 2007 to July 7, 2009.
Public Trading Multiples. Using publicly
available information, JPMorgan compared selected financial data
of IPC and Validus with similar data for selected publicly
traded companies engaged in businesses which JPMorgan judged to
be analogous to IPC and Validus. The companies selected by
JPMorgan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings;
|
|
|
|
Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Max Capital Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Montpelier Re Holdings;
|
|
|
|
Platinum Underwriters Holdings Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.; and
|
|
|
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
|
These companies were selected, among other reasons, because they
are Bermuda-based insurers/reinsurers with significant
reinsurance businesses, have similar competitive dynamics and
have a capital base within a range encompassing IPC and Validus.
JPMorgan reviewed, among other information, (1) the price
per share of the particular company compared to calendar year
2010 earnings per share as estimated by Wall Street analysts to
determine a range of multiples of the ratio of the price per
share to 2010 estimated earnings per share, and (2) the
market value of the particular companys equity compared to
actual book value of equity as of March 31, 2009, to
determine a range of multiples of the ratio of the market value
of equity to actual book value of equity as of March 31,
2009, for the selected companies.
The analysis indicated that the range of the ratio of the price
per share to 2010 estimated earnings per share was from 4.4x to
6.2x. JPMorgan applied the range to IPC and Validus and
calculated the following implied equity values per share for
each using projected 2010 net income for each of the cases
set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Share Price to 2010
Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
Monoline
|
|
|
Organic
|
|
|
Adjusted Validus
|
|
|
|
Case
|
|
|
Growth Case
|
|
|
Standalone Case
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Low
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
JPMorgan then calculated (1) the ratio of the lowest
implied equity value per share for IPC to the highest implied
equity value per share for Validus, and (2) the ratio of
the highest implied equity value per share for IPC to the lowest
implied equity value per share for Validus to derive an implied
exchange ratio range for a theoretical all-stock transaction as
shown below. This range was compared to the equivalent all-stock
exchange ratio of 1.3009x. In addition, JPMorgan calculated
(1) the ratio of the lowest implied equity value per share
for IPC less the approximately $424mm of aggregate cash
consideration to be paid to the holders of the IPC Shares in the
Amalgamation (the aggregate cash consideration) to
the highest implied equity value per share for Validus, and
(2) the ratio of the highest implied equity value per share
for IPC less the aggregate cash consideration to the lowest
implied equity value per share for Validus to derive an implied
exchange ratio
77
range adjusted for the aggregate cash consideration as shown
below. This range was compared to the exchange ratio in the
proposed Amalgamation of 0.9727x. Both analyses were repeated
for the following combinations of projections for IPC and
Validus: (1) the monoline case to the adjusted Validus
standalone case and (2) the organic growth case to the
adjusted Validus standalone case.
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis Assuming Theoretical 100%
Stock Transaction Price to 2010 Earnings per
Share
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
ratio
|
|
|
Monoline Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC equity value per share to lowest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
1.562
|
x
|
Lowest IPC equity value per share to highest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
0.787
|
|
Organic Growth Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC equity value per share to lowest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
1.635
|
x
|
Lowest IPC equity value per share to highest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
0.824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis Adjusted for Aggregate Cash
Consideration Price to 2010 Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
ratio
|
|
|
Monoline Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC adjusted equity value per share to lowest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
1.082
|
x
|
Lowest IPC adjusted equity value per share to highest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
0.446
|
|
Organic Growth Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC adjusted equity value per share to lowest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
1.156
|
x
|
Lowest IPC adjusted equity value per share to highest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
0.483
|
|
Additionally, the analysis indicated that the range of the ratio
of the market value of equity to actual book value of equity as
of March 31, 2009 was from 0.69x to 0.95x. JPMorgan rounded
the 0.69x to 0.70x and then applied a range from 0.70x to 0.95x
to IPC and Validus and calculated the following implied equity
values per share for each using the actual book value of equity
as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Share Market Value of
Equity to Book Value as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Low
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
JPMorgan then calculated (1) the ratio of the lowest
implied equity value per share for IPC to the highest implied
equity value per share for Validus, and (2) the ratio of
the highest implied equity value per share for IPC to the lowest
implied equity value per share for Validus to derive an implied
exchange ratio range for a theoretical all-stock transaction of
1.073x to 1.977x, as compared to the equivalent all-stock
exchange ratio of 1.3009x. In addition, JPMorgan calculated
(1) the ratio of the lowest implied equity value per share
for IPC less the aggregate cash consideration to the highest
implied equity value per share for Validus, and (2) the
ratio of the highest implied equity value per share for IPC less
the aggregate cash consideration to the lowest implied equity
value per share for Validus to derive an implied exchange ratio
range adjusted for the aggregate cash consideration of 0.722x to
1.500x. This range was compared to the exchange ratio in the
proposed Amalgamation of 0.9727x.
Selected Transaction Analysis. Using publicly
available information, JPMorgan examined selected transactions
with respect to the Bermuda reinsurance sector. Specifically,
JPMorgan reviewed the following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.s acquisition of PARIS RE Holdings Limited
for a multiple of 0.97x of PARIS RE Holdings Limiteds last
publicly-reported book value, which was used as the high end of
the multiple range; and
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.s previously proposed combination with
Max Capital Group Ltd. at a multiple of 0.72x of Max Capital
Group Ltd.s last publicly-reported book value, which was
used as the low end of the multiple range.
|
JPMorgan applied the
0.72x-0.97x
multiple range to IPCs actual book value of equity as of
March 31, 2009 and arrived at an estimated range of equity
values for IPC Shares of between $23 and $32 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Share Market Value of
Equity to Book Value as of Mar. 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Low
|
|
|
23
|
|
Dividend Discount Model Analysis. JPMorgan
conducted a dividend discount model analysis for each of IPC,
Validus and the combined entity for the purpose of determining
the fully diluted implied equity value per share of each of IPC
and Validus on a standalone basis as well as the combined
entity. A dividend discount model analysis is a method of
evaluating the equity value of a company using estimates of the
future dividends to shareholders generated by the company and
taking into consideration the time value of money with respect
to those future dividends by calculating their present
value. Present value refers to the current
value of future dividends to shareholders paid by the company
and is obtained by discounting those future dividends back to
the present using a discount rate that takes into account
macro-economic assumptions, estimates of risk, the opportunity
cost of capital, and other appropriate factors.
Based on the net income that IPC, Validus and the combined
entity are projected to generate during fiscal years 2009
through 2018 and JPMorgan calculated the maximum possible
dividends that can be paid out in each year subject to an
operating leverage (net premiums written divided by
shareholders equity) constraint and statutory constraints,
assuming no capital is returned through share repurchases. The
dividend stream for the years 2009 through 2018 was then
discounted to present values using a range of discount rates
from 11.0% to 14.0%, which was chosen by JPMorgan based upon an
analysis of the cost of equity of IPC and Validus. JPMorgan also
calculated a range of terminal values for IPC, Validus and the
combined entity at the end of the
10-year
period ending 2018 by applying a perpetual dividend growth rate
ranging from 1.5% to 2.5% and discounted the terminal value
using a range of discount rates from 11.0% to 14.0.
Terminal value refers to the capitalized value of
all future dividends to shareholders paid by the company for
periods beyond the final forecast period.
JPMorgan carried out the foregoing analysis based upon the
monoline case and organic growth case for IPC, the adjusted
Validus standalone case for Validus and the adjusted Validus
combined case for the combined entity.
JPMorgan also conducted a dividend discount model analysis for
the run-off case. The run-off case assumes no new premiums are
written beginning in 2010, with the majority of capital returned
as dividends as reserves are paid out, and the remaining value
recovered through the sale of IPC at the end of 2012. JPMorgan
calculated the maximum possible dividends that can be paid out
during fiscal years 2009 through 2012, and discounted the
resulting dividend stream to present values using a range of
discount rates from 11.0% to 14.0%. As directed by IPC
management, JPMorgan assumed a September 30 discounting date to
discount annual dividends for the dividend discount model
valuation of the run-off case. JPMorgan also calculated a range
of terminal values for the run-off case at the end of the
four-year period ending 2012 by applying an exit multiple range
of 0.80x to 1.00x to projected December 31, 2012 book value
and discounted the terminal value using a range of discount
rates from 11.0% to 14.0%.
79
The analysis yielded the following implied equity value per
share of IPC and Validus in the cases set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Equity Value per Share Dividend Discount
Model
|
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
Monoline
|
|
|
Organic
|
|
|
Run-off
|
|
|
Adjusted Validus
|
|
|
|
Case
|
|
|
Growth Case
|
|
|
Case
|
|
|
Standalone Case
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Mid-point(1)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Low
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mid-point calculated using the mid-point of the discount rate
range (12.5%) and the mid-point of the perpetuity growth rate
range (2.0%). |
JPMorgan then calculated (1) the ratio of the lowest
implied equity value per share for IPC to the highest implied
equity value per share for Validus, and (2) the ratio of
the highest implied equity value per share for IPC to the lowest
implied equity value per share for Validus to derive an implied
exchange ratio range for a theoretical all-stock transaction as
shown below, as compared to the equivalent all-stock exchange
ratio of 1.3009x. In addition, JPMorgan calculated (1) the
ratio of the lowest implied equity value per share for IPC less
the aggregate cash consideration to the highest implied equity
value per share for Validus, and (2) the ratio of the
highest implied equity value per share for IPC less the
aggregate cash consideration to the lowest implied equity value
per share for Validus to derive an implied exchange ratio range
adjusted for the aggregate cash consideration as shown below.
This range was compared to the exchange ratio in the proposed
Amalgamation of 0.9727x. Both analyses were repeated for the
following combinations of projections for IPC and Validus:
(1) the monoline case to the adjusted Validus standalone
case and (2) the organic growth case to the adjusted
Validus standalone case.
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis Assuming Theoretical 100%
Stock Transaction Dividend Discount Model
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
ratio
|
|
|
Monoline Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC equity value per share to lowest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
1.444
|
x
|
Lowest IPC equity value per share to highest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
0.700
|
|
Organic Growth Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC equity value per share to lowest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
1.670
|
x
|
Lowest IPC equity value per share to highest Validus equity
value per share
|
|
|
0.792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis Adjusted for Aggregate Cash
Consideration Dividend Discount Model
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
ratio
|
|
|
Monoline Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC adjusted equity value per share to lowest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
1.141
|
x
|
Lowest IPC adjusted equity value per share to highest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
0.494
|
|
Organic Growth Case to Adjusted Validus Standalone Case
|
|
|
|
|
Highest IPC adjusted equity value per share to lowest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
1.367
|
x
|
Lowest IPC adjusted equity value per share to highest Validus
equity value per share
|
|
|
0.586
|
|
Illustrative Value Creation Analysis. JPMorgan
also performed an illustrative value creation analysis with and
without synergies. The equity value of the combined entity
assuming no synergies is equal to the sum of the equity value of
IPC standalone and Validus standalone based on the mid-point
valuation derived from the dividend discount model analysis,
less an aggregate of $500mm representing the total of the
following amounts: (1) the aggregate cash consideration,
(2) the $50mm Max break up fee and (3) an estimated
$26.2mm of transaction expenses incurred after March 31,
2009. The implied equity value and equity value per share paid
to the holders of the IPC Shares in the transaction is
calculated as IPC
80
shareholders pro rata share, as implied by the exchange
ratio of 0.9727x, of the implied equity value and equity value
per share of the combined entity plus the cash consideration of
$7.50 per share. This analysis, assuming no synergies, was
performed using the following combinations of projections for
IPC and Validus to calculate the implied equity value of the
combined entity:
|
|
|
|
|
For comparison to the monoline case for IPC stand-alone: sum of
the monoline case and the adjusted Validus standalone case.
|
|
|
|
For comparison to the organic growth case for IPC stand-alone:
sum of the organic growth case and the adjusted Validus
standalone case.
|
|
|
|
For comparison to the run-off case for IPC stand-alone: sum of
the run-off case and the adjusted Validus standalone case.
|
This analysis yielded the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Illustrative Value Creation Analysis Assuming No
Synergies
|
|
% Increase
|
|
|
Sum of Adjusted Validus Standalone Case and respective IPC
standalone case, compared to
|
|
|
|
|
Organic Growth Case
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Monoline Case
|
|
|
12
|
|
Run-off Case
|
|
|
14
|
|
The value creation analysis was then repeated to include
synergies. The equity value of the combined entity with
synergies reflects the adjusted Validus combined case based on
the mid-point valuation derived from the dividend discount model
analysis. Implied value creation with respect to IPC was
calculated by comparing (1) the implied equity value and
equity value per share of IPC standalone for each of
(a) the monoline case, (b) the organic growth case and
(c) the run-off case to (2) IPC shareholders pro
rata share, as implied by the exchange ratio of 0.9727x, of the
implied equity value and equity value per share of the combined
entity plus the cash consideration of $7.50 per share. This
analysis yielded the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Illustrative Value Creation Analysis Assuming
Synergies
|
|
% Increase
|
|
|
Adjusted Validus Combined Case compared to
|
|
|
|
|
Organic Growth Case
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Monoline Case
|
|
|
34
|
|
Run-off Case
|
|
|
38
|
|
Certain Considerations. The foregoing summary
of certain material financial analyses does not purport to be a
complete description of the analyses or data presented by
JPMorgan. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description. JPMorgan believes that the foregoing
summary and its analyses must be considered as a whole and that
selecting portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses,
without considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create
an incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and
its opinion. In arriving at its opinion, JPMorgan did not
attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors
considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered
in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion.
Rather, JPMorgan considered the totality of the factors and
analyses performed in determining its opinion and made its
determination as to fairness based on its professional judgment
and after considering the results of all its analyses. Analyses
based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain,
as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the
control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly,
forecasts and analyses used or made by JPMorgan are not
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those
analyses. Moreover, JPMorgans analyses are not and do not
purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices
at which businesses actually could be bought or sold. None of
the selected companies reviewed as described in the above
summary is identical to IPC or Validus (other than IPC or
Validus, as applicable) and none of the selected transactions
reviewed was identical to the Amalgamation. However, the
companies selected were chosen because they are publicly traded
companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of
JPMorgans analyses, may be considered similar to those of
IPC. The transactions selected were similarly chosen because
their
81
participants, size and other factors, for purposes of
JPMorgans analyses, may be considered similar to the
Amalgamation. The analyses necessarily involve complex
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial
and operational characteristics of the companies involved and
other factors that could affect the companies compared to IPC or
Validus and the transactions compared to the Amalgamation.
Engagement
of JPMorgan
As a part of its investment banking business, JPMorgan and its
affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. JPMorgan was selected to
advise IPC with respect to the Amalgamation and deliver an
opinion to IPCs board of directors with respect to the
Amalgamation on the basis of such experience and its familiarity
with IPC.
For services rendered in connection with the Amalgamation
(including the delivery of its opinion), IPC has agreed to pay
JPMorgan customary compensation in respect thereof, a
substantial portion of which will become payable only if the
proposed Amalgamation is consummated. Specifically, IPC agreed
to pay JPMorgan an aggregate fee equal to 1.0% of the
consideration in the transaction including the amount of
IPCs outstanding indebtedness immediately prior to the
closing of the transaction. Based on the closing price of
Validus Shares on August 4, 2009, the fee would be approximately
$17.2 million. As of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, $3.7 million of the fee has been
paid. The remaining portion of the fee is payable upon the
closing of a significant business combination transaction,
including the Amalgamation with Validus. See The
Amalgamation Sources of Funds, Fees and
Expenses. In addition, IPC has agreed to reimburse JPMorgan
for its expenses incurred in connection with its services,
including the fees and disbursements of counsel, and will
indemnify JPMorgan against certain liabilities arising out of
JPMorgans engagement by IPC, including liabilities arising
under the federal securities laws. In certain circumstances, if
the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated and IPC receives the
termination fee as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement, JPMorgan will be entitled to a portion of the
termination fee IPC receives.
JPMorgan and its affiliates have had commercial or investment
banking relationships with IPC and Validus in the past for which
it and such affiliates have received customary compensation. For
the two years preceding the date of JPMorgans opinion,
such services have included an engagement to act as financial
advisor to IPC in connection with its analysis and consideration
of various potential strategic alternatives. That engagement
resulted in JPMorgans engagement to act as IPCs
financial advisor in connection with the Amalgamation. In
addition, JPMorgans commercial banking affiliate is a
lender under the outstanding $500,000,000 senior credit
facilities of IPC (the IPC credit facility), for
which it receives customary compensation or other financial
benefits. The IPC credit facility was amended in connection with
the Amalgamation and such amendment resulted in the payment of
customary compensation to JPMorgans affiliate and in
certain of the terms under the IPC credit facility being amended
to be more favorable to the lenders thereunder. JPMorgans
commercial banking affiliate is lead arranger of Validus
syndicated credit facility (the Validus credit
facility), which includes a $200,000,000 three-year
unsecured facility and a $500,000,000 five-year secured letter
of credit facility, and such affiliate receives customary
compensation and other financial benefits in connection with the
Validus credit facility. The parties have entered into an
amendment to the Validus credit facility in connection with the
Amalgamation. Such amendment resulted in the payment of
customary compensation to JPMorgans affiliate and, if the
Amalgamation closes and the amendment becomes effective, will
result in certain of the terms under the Validus credit facility
being amended to be more favorable to the lenders thereunder.
See The Amalgamation Modification of Validus
Credit Facilities Validus Re Credit Facilities.
JPMorgan acted as one of the underwriters for Validus
initial public offering in July 2007, and it received customary
compensation in connection therewith. JPMorgans services
also include treasury and security services provided to Validus,
for which JPMorgan receives customary compensation. For the two
year period preceding the date of JPMorgans opinion, and
disregarding the fees payable in connection with the
Amalgamation as described in the preceding paragraph, the
aggregate amount of compensation received by JPMorgan and its
affiliates in respect of the matters described in this paragraph
was approximately $1.4 million in the case of Validus and
$0.3 million in the case of IPC.
82
In the ordinary course of their businesses, JPMorgan and its
affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity securities of
IPC or Validus or certain of their affiliates for
JPMorgans
and/or such
affiliatess own accounts or for the accounts of their
customers and, accordingly, they may at any time hold long or
short positions in such securities.
Projected
Financial Information
Certain financial projections prepared by, or as directed by,
IPCs management were considered by IPCs board of
directors in connection with its approval of and entry into the
Amalgamation Agreement. Certain financial projections prepared
by, or as directed by, Validus management were delivered
to IPC and its advisors, were adjusted by, or as directed by,
IPCs management and as so adjusted were considered by
IPCs board of directors in connection with the
Amalgamation. Summaries of the foregoing financial projections
(the financial projections) are being provided
herein solely because they were considered by, or used to
prepare projections that were considered by, IPCs board of
directors in connection with the proposed Amalgamation.
The financial projections reflect numerous judgments, estimates
and assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions
and other future events, as well as matters specific to
Validus and IPCs respective businesses, all of which
are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond control.
The financial projections are subjective in many respects and
thus are susceptible to multiple interpretations and periodic
revisions based on actual experience and business developments.
As such, the financial projections constitute forward-looking
information and are subject to risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the results
forecasted in such projections, including the various risks set
forth in IPCs and Validus periodic reports and in
the Risk Factors section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See also Forward-Looking
Statements. There can be no assurance that the projected
results will be realized or that actual results will not be
significantly higher or lower than projected. The projections
cannot be considered a reliable predictor of future results and
should not be relied upon as such. The financial projections
cover multiple years and such information by its nature becomes
less reliable with each successive year.
The financial projections do not take into account any
circumstances or events occurring after the date they were
prepared, including the announcement of the proposed
Amalgamation. The financial projections also do not take into
account the effect of any failure to occur of the proposed
Amalgamation and should not be viewed as accurate or continuing
in that context. See Risk Factors The
Amalgamation remains subject to conditions and failure to
complete the Amalgamation could negatively impact Validus and
IPC.
The financial projections were prepared solely for use in
connection with evaluating the potential transaction and not
with a view toward public disclosure or toward complying with
generally accepted accounting principles, the published
guidelines of the SEC regarding projections or the guidelines
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective
financial information. Neither Validus nor IPCs
independent registered public accounting firm, nor any other
independent accountants, have compiled, examined or performed
any procedures with respect to the financial projections
included below, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other
form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and
they assume no responsibility for, and deny any association
with, the financial projections. The PricewaterhouseCoopers
report included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus refers
to Validus historical financial information. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers report does not cover any other
information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and should
not be read to do so.
The inclusion of the financial projections herein will not be
deemed an admission or representation by Validus or IPC that
they are viewed by Validus or IPC as material information of
Validus or IPC or the combined entity. These projections are not
included in this document in order to induce any holder of IPC
Shares or Validus Shares to vote in favor of the proposals
submitted to Validus and IPCs respective
shareholders as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Neither Validus nor IPC intends to update
or otherwise revise these projections to reflect circumstances
existing since their preparation, to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events even in the event that any or all of the
underlying assumptions are shown to be in error, or to reflect
changes in general economic or industry conditions.
83
Projections Prepared by Validus. Subject to
the foregoing qualifications, the gross premiums written, net
premiums written, loss ratio, combined ratio, net income and
shareholders equity reflected below by fiscal year through
the year 2013 were prepared by, or as directed by, Validus
management and were delivered to IPC and its advisors. Each of
the foregoing is set forth as projected based on the following
cases: Validus standalone case and the Validus and IPC
combined case.
Certain
Projected Financial Information: Validus Standalone
Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,799
|
|
|
$
|
1,914
|
|
|
$
|
1,961
|
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
1,595
|
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
$
|
1,728
|
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
47.7
|
%
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
49.1
|
%
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
|
49.1
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
|
|
81.6
|
%
|
|
|
81.0
|
%
|
|
|
80.5
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
Shareholders equity(1)
|
|
$
|
2,269
|
|
|
$
|
2,623
|
|
|
$
|
3,023
|
|
|
$
|
3,450
|
|
|
$
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impact of assumed continuation of historical dividends. |
Certain
Projected Financial Information: Validus and IPC Combined
Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,463
|
|
|
$
|
2,779
|
|
|
$
|
2,915
|
|
|
$
|
3,030
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,232
|
|
|
$
|
2,512
|
|
|
$
|
2,637
|
|
|
$
|
2,747
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
45.1
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
74.8
|
%
|
|
|
74.8
|
%
|
|
|
73.6
|
%
|
|
|
73.4
|
%
|
|
|
72.9
|
%
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
766
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
964
|
|
|
$
|
1,026
|
|
Shareholders equity(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
4,077
|
|
|
$
|
4,722
|
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
|
$
|
6,344
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impact of assumed continuation of historical dividends. |
|
(2) |
|
Prepared on the basis of the Further Improved Validus Offer
($3.75 in cash and 1.1234 Validus Shares per IPC Share); not
updated for the final amalgamation consideration of $7.50 in
cash and 0.9727 Validus Shares per IPC Share. |
Projections Reviewed by IPCs Board of
Directors. Subject to the foregoing
qualifications, the gross premiums written, net premiums
written, loss ratio, combined ratio, net income and
shareholders equity reflected below by fiscal year through
the year 2013 and also for the year 2018 were reviewed by
IPCs board of directors. Each of the foregoing is set
forth as projected based on the following cases (as each of the
following cases is described in Opinion of
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Financial Advisor to
IPCs Board): IPCs monoline case, IPCs
organic growth case, IPCs run-off case (except that
IPCs run-off case shows projections only until 2012), the
adjusted Validus standalone case and the adjusted Validus
combined case. The adjusted Validus standalone case and the
adjusted Validus combined case set forth below reflect
(1) assumptions made to make the corresponding Validus
projections comparable with those of IPC, specifically with
respect to projected loss ratios for lines of business that are
similar for the two companies and yield assumptions on
investment portfolios and (2) other adjustments to loss
ratio projections determined to be appropriate by IPCs
management.
84
Certain
Projected Financial Information: IPC Monoline Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2018E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
455
|
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
73.3
|
%
|
|
|
73.5
|
%
|
|
|
73.3
|
%
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
Shareholders equity(1)
|
|
$
|
2,046
|
|
|
$
|
2,103
|
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
|
$
|
2,124
|
|
|
$
|
2,131
|
|
|
$
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impact of capital management (share repurchases and
assumed continuation of historical dividends) |
Certain
Projected Financial Information: IPC Organic Growth
Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2018E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
$
|
802
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
$
|
752
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
|
|
56.1
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
56.3
|
%
|
|
|
56.3
|
%
|
|
|
56.3
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
75.1
|
%
|
|
|
76.8
|
%
|
|
|
78.0
|
%
|
|
|
78.5
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
Shareholders equity(1)
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
$
|
2,192
|
|
|
$
|
2,241
|
|
|
$
|
2,323
|
|
|
$
|
2,353
|
|
|
$
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impact of capital management (share repurchases and
assumed continuation of historical dividends) |
Certain
Projected Financial Information: IPC Run-Off Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2018E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
Certain
Projected Financial Information: Adjusted Validus Standalone
Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2018E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,799
|
|
|
$
|
1,914
|
|
|
$
|
1,961
|
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
|
$
|
2,234
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
1,595
|
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
|
$
|
1,728
|
|
|
$
|
1,775
|
|
|
$
|
1,978
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
55.7
|
%
|
|
|
56.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.0
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
86.6
|
%
|
|
|
88.3
|
%
|
|
|
87.8
|
%
|
|
|
87.4
|
%
|
|
|
87.1
|
%
|
|
|
86.7
|
%
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
Shareholders equity(1)
|
|
$
|
2,175
|
|
|
$
|
2,428
|
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
|
$
|
3,032
|
|
|
$
|
3,368
|
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impact of capital management (assumed constant dividend
per share growth rate). |
Certain
Projected Financial Information: Adjusted Validus Combined
Case
Fiscal year ending December 31 ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009E
|
|
|
2010E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2013E
|
|
|
2018E
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
|
$
|
2,684
|
|
|
$
|
2,830
|
|
|
$
|
2,956
|
|
|
$
|
3,310
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,862
|
|
|
$
|
2,190
|
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
$
|
2,555
|
|
|
$
|
2,675
|
|
|
$
|
3,001
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
54.1
|
%
|
|
|
55.4
|
%
|
|
|
55.6
|
%
|
|
|
55.5
|
%
|
|
|
55.4
|
%
|
|
|
55.4
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
83.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.2
|
%
|
|
|
83.6
|
%
|
|
|
83.0
|
%
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
490
|
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
|
$
|
695
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
Shareholders equity(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
3,678
|
|
|
$
|
4,066
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
4,869
|
|
|
$
|
5,296
|
|
|
$
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes impact of capital management (share repurchases and
assumed constant dividend per share growth rate). |
|
(2) |
|
Prepared on the basis of Validus final offer ($7.50 in
cash and 0.9727 Validus Shares per IPC Share). |
Interests
of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the
Amalgamation
The consummation of the Amalgamation will not be deemed to be a
change in control impacting grants under any of Validus
long-term incentive or stock option plans, or a change in
control under any employment agreement between Validus and any
of its employees. As a result, no options or other equity grants
held by such persons will vest as a result of the Amalgamation.
Interests
of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the
Amalgamation
Executive
Officers and Directors
In considering the recommendations of IPCs board of
directors that IPC shareholders vote FOR the
proposals regarding the Amalgamation, the IPC shareholders
should be aware that executive officers, individually, and all
the members of IPCs board of directors as a group, have
interests in the proposed Amalgamation that are different from,
and/or in
addition to, the interests of IPC shareholders generally.
IPCs board of directors was aware of and considered these
differing interests and potential conflicts in recommending that
the IPC shareholders vote FOR the proposals at the
IPC special meeting.
86
Treatment
of Outstanding IPC Equity Awards
Based on the number of outstanding options held by IPC officers
as of August 4, 2009, the table below provides the number
of IPC options Messrs. Bryce, Weale, Fallon and Cozens
would surrender and the pro forma number of Validus options they
would receive based on the closing price of Validus stock
($23.61) on August 4, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Validus Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
purchasable upon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding IPC
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
|
underlying New
|
|
|
|
exercise of New
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Grant
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
IPC Option
|
|
|
|
Validus Options
|
|
|
|
Validus Option
|
|
Mr. Bryce
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.85
|
|
|
|
|
45,163
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,2003
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.54
|
|
|
|
|
38,711
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.90
|
|
|
|
|
51,614
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.03
|
|
|
|
|
51,614
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
|
51,614
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Weale
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2000
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.38
|
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.00
|
|
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.85
|
|
|
|
|
25,807
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.54
|
|
|
|
|
19,355
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.90
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.03
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fallon
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.85
|
|
|
|
|
8,065
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.54
|
|
|
|
|
12,904
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.90
|
|
|
|
|
24,194
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.03
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Cozens
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.85
|
|
|
|
|
6,452
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.54
|
|
|
|
|
9,678
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.90
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
43.03
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
|
32,259
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information on how IPCs officers IPC
options will be converted into Validus options, and more
generally, the treatment of IPCs equity compensation
awards, see The Amalgamation Agreement Treatment
of IPC Share Options and Other IPC Equity Awards on
page 95.
IPC directors and officers hold unvested IPC share options,
restricted shares, restricted share units and performance share
units under the IPC 2007 Incentive Plan, the IPC 2005 Stock
Option Plan and the IPC 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (IPC
Plans). Given the percentage change in ownership of IPC
shares as a result of the proposed Amalgamation, the
Compensation Committee of IPCs board of directors reviewed
whether the Amalgamation would implicate the change in control
provisions of the IPC Plans and concluded that the closing of
the Amalgamation would be a change in control under the IPC
Plans. In accordance with the terms of the IPC 2007 Incentive
Plan, in the event an executives employment is terminated
without Cause (as such term is defined in the IPC
2007 Incentive Plan) within 12 months following the closing
of the proposed Amalgamation, the executive will fully vest in
his unvested equity awards and any applicable transfer
restrictions will lapse immediately. All equity awards granted
under the IPC 2005 Stock Option Plan and the IPC 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan will vest following the closing of the
Amalgamation, as both plans provide for full vesting of equity
awards in the event IPC undergoes a transaction that is a change
in control.
87
Retirement
and Consulting Agreement
Pursuant to the terms of his retirement and consulting
agreement, James P. Bryce, IPCs former Chief Executive
Officer and President who retired on June 30, 2009, will
provide consulting services to IPC until December 31, 2009
(the initial consulting period), unless the period
is mutually extended by the parties. During the initial
consulting period, Mr. Bryce will receive monthly
consulting fees of $75,000, certain benefits (such as medical,
life and disability) and reimbursement of expenses, including
the cost of travel between Bermuda and his home. Upon his
retirement, Mr. Bryce will receive the payments and
benefits under his individual retirement and deferred
compensation agreements and IPCs Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan, in each case in accordance with the terms of
the applicable agreement or plan. Mr. Bryce will also
retain all of his rights to indemnification by virtue of his
position as an officer or director of IPC or other affiliated
entities and the benefits under any directors and
officers liability insurance policy maintained by IPC.
Employment
Agreements
Each of John R. Weale, Peter J. A. Cozens and Stephen F. Fallon
has entered into an employment agreement. Given the percentage
change in ownership of IPC shares as a result proposed
Amalgamation, the Compensation Committee of IPCs board of
directors reviewed whether the proposed Amalgamation would
trigger the change in control provisions of the employment
agreements and concluded that the Amalgamation does constitute a
change in control under those agreements. Assuming a termination
without Cause (as such term is defined in the
employment agreements) and a termination date of October 1,
2009, following the Amalgamation, the estimated cash severance
benefits for Messrs. Weale, Cozens and Fallon under the
employment agreements would be $1,798,500, $1,476,000 and
$1,466,750, respectively. Additionally, assuming a termination
date of October 1, 2009, following the Amalgamation,
Messrs. Weale, Cozens and Fallon would be paid the
retention bonuses pursuant to the terms of their employment
agreements in the amounts of $646,250, $432,000 and $429,000,
respectively. In accordance with the Amalgamation Agreement,
Messrs. Weale, Cozens and Fallon will continue to be
employed as officers of IPCRe at the annual salary and other
terms set forth in their respective employment agreements.
Indemnification
and Insurance
IPC maintains standard directors and officers
liability insurance policies under which, pursuant to their
respective retirement and employment agreements,
Messrs. Bryce, Weale, Cozens and Fallon have rights to
indemnification. In addition, each of IPCs officers and
directors has rights to indemnification by virtue of their
positions as officers
and/or
directors of IPC. Further, the Amalgamation Agreement provides
that such insurance and right to indemnification will be
maintained following the Amalgamation. The parties executed the
Amalgamation Agreement as a deed, and IPCs current
directors may separately sign the Amalgamation Agreement after
the date of its execution by IPC, Validus and Validus Ltd. The
IPC directors who separately execute the Amalgamation Agreement
will be third-party beneficiaries to the Amalgamation Agreement
entitled to enforce the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement
relating to indemnity and expense reimbursement, the provision
of tail insurance policies, and the applicability of such
provisions to successor entities directly against IPC, Validus,
Validus Ltd. and the combined entity. See The Amalgamation
Agreement Directors and Officers
Insurance and Indemnification.
Voting
Agreements
In connection with the Amalgamation Agreement, affiliates of
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, Vestar Capital Partners, and New
Mountain Capital, LLC, which collectively owned approximately
38% of Validus Shares as of July 27, 2009, have agreed to
vote in favor of the issuance of Validus Shares in connection
with the Amalgamation. Each of the voting agreements will
terminate upon the earlier of: (i) the mutual consent of
IPC and a shareholder; (ii) the holding of a duly called meeting
of the shareholders of Validus (or an adjournment or
postponement thereof) relating to the approval of the issuance
of Validus Shares in connection with the Amalgamation at which a
shareholder is present and votes its Validus Shares in favor of
such issuance; and (iii) the date of termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement in accordance with its terms.
88
Modification
of IPC Credit Facilities
In connection with entering into the Amalgamation Agreement, IPC
and IPCRe entered into the Second Amendment and Limited Consent
to Credit Agreement (the Second Amendment) with the
Lenders party thereto (Lenders) and Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Administrative Agent, as of
July 8, 2009. The Second Amendment relates to the Credit
Agreement dated April 13, 2006, as amended, between IPC and
IPCRe, the Lenders and Wachovia Bank, National Association (the
Credit Agreement). The Second Amendment includes the
required Lenders consent for IPC to enter into the
Amalgamation Agreement, and includes certain amendments to the
Credit Agreement.
Pursuant to the Second Amendment, the $250,000,000 senior
unsecured tranche of the credit facility will be permanently
terminated. In addition, the amendments increase the applicable
interest rates and fees on the senior secured tranche of the
credit facility, require IPC to fully cash collateralize its
obligation under the senior secured tranche, and modify certain
other terms. As amended, the events of default include, among
other things, a change in control of the combined entity. Upon
the consummation of the Amalgamation, IPC and IPCRe will no
longer be required to comply with the financial covenants
contained in the Credit Agreement.
Modification
of Validus Credit Facilities
Talbot
Credit Facility
On July 23, 2009, Validus, its wholly owned subsidiary
Talbot Holdings Ltd. (Talbot) and the lenders
executed Amendment No. 1 (Talbot Amendment) to
the Standby Letter of Credit Facility, dated as of
November 28, 2007 (the Talbot Facility), among
Validus, Talbot, the lenders party thereto and Lloyds TSB Bank
plc as agent. The Talbot Amendment will become effective upon
the consummation of the Amalgamation and satisfaction or waiver
of the other conditions contained therein.
The Talbot Amendment will amend the merger and investment
covenants in the Talbot Facility to permit the Amalgamation. In
addition, it will increase the fees on secured letters of credit
from 0.25% per annum to 0.625% per annum and on unsecured
letters of credit from a range of 0.40%-1.00% per annum to 3.00%
per annum. It will also increase the commitment fee in respect
of unused commitments from 0.10% per annum to 0.50% per annum.
The initial minimum consolidated net worth level will be reset
as 70% of Validus consolidated net worth, calculated using
the pro forma balance sheet included herein under Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information.
Certain other provisions of the Talbot Facility will be amended
as set forth in the Talbot Amendment.
In the Talbot Amendment, Validus and Talbot will represent that,
as of the date of consummation of the Amalgamation, certain
representations and warranties in the Talbot Facility are true
and correct in all material respects, no default or event of
default under the Talbot Facility has occurred which is
continuing and the financial strength rating assigned to Validus
Re and IPCRe by A.M. Best is no lower than
A−. Among the conditions to the effectiveness
of the Talbot Amendment are the representations and warranties
in the Talbot Amendment being true in all material respects, no
default existing or resulting from the Amalgamation, the
Amalgamation occurring no later than January 31, 2010 and
payment of customary fees to the lenders.
This is a summary of the Talbot Amendment and does not purport
to be complete. Reference is made to the full Talbot Amendment,
which was filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by Validus on July 27, 2009.
Validus
Re Credit Facilities
On July 24, 2009, Validus, Validus Re and the lenders
executed the Second Amendment (the Validus
Amendment) to each of the Three-Year Unsecured Letter of
Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2007 (as
amended, the Three-Year Facility), and the Five-Year
Secured Letter of Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of
March 12, 2007 (as amended, the Five-Year
Facility and together with the Three-Year Facility, the
Validus Facilities), among Validus, Validus Re, the
lenders party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent. The Validus Amendment will
become effective upon the
89
consummation of the Amalgamation and satisfaction or waiver of
the other conditions contained therein. Validus paid customary
fees in connection with the Validus Amendment. Consummation of
the Amalgamation is conditioned upon Validus securing an
amendment to its existing syndicated credit facilities as
reasonably determined by the parties to permit the consummation
of the Amalgamation pursuant to those facilities, or Validus
otherwise obtaining a replacement facility.
The Validus Amendment will amend the merger and investment
covenants in the Validus Facilities to permit the Amalgamation.
In addition, with respect to the Five-Year Facility, it will
increase the letter of credit fee from 0.25% per annum to 0.625%
per annum and the commitment fee in respect of unused
commitments from 0.08% per annum to 0.125% per annum. With
respect to the Three-Year Facility, it will increase the letter
of credit fee, commitment fee and interest rate margin pursuant
to a grid based on ratings issued by Moodys Investor
Service, Inc. and Standard & Poors Ratings Group
with respect to Validus. The initial minimum consolidated net
worth level will be reset as 70% of Validus consolidated
net worth, calculated using the pro forma balance sheet included
under Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial
Information. Certain other provisions of the Validus
Facilities will be amended as set forth in the Validus Amendment.
In the Validus Amendment, Validus and Validus Re will represent
that, as of the date of effectiveness of the Validus Amendment,
the representations and warranties in the Validus Facilities
(other than the representation regarding an absence of a
material adverse effect) are true and correct in all material
respects, no default or event of default under the Validus
Facilities has occurred and is continuing and the financial
strength rating assigned to Validus Re, IPCRe and each other
rated regulated insurance company subsidiary that is material to
Validus and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, by
A.M. Best is no lower than A−.
This is a summary of the Validus Amendment and does not purport
to be complete. Reference is made to the full Validus Amendment,
which was filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed by Validus on July 27, 2009.
Listing
of Validus Shares
It is a condition to the closing of the Amalgamation that the
Validus Shares issuable to IPC shareholders in the Amalgamation
and the Validus Shares to be reserved for issuance upon the
exercise of IPC options and the vesting of IPC Shares authorized
to be issued under IPCs outstanding equity compensation
plans shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE,
subject to official notice of issuance.
Delisting
of IPC Shares
Upon completion of the Amalgamation, IPC Shares, which are
currently quoted on NASDAQ under the symbol IPCR and
the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol IPCR BH,
will be delisted.
Dividends
and Distributions
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash
dividend, i.e., $0.20 per common share in
Validus case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs
case. Validus expects to continue to pay its regular quarterly
dividends consistent with past practice. Under the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement, before the Amalgamation closes, Validus
and IPC are permitted to declare and pay ordinary course
quarterly dividends on their common shares with record and
payment dates consistent with past practice; provided
that any such dividend is at a rate no greater than the rate
it paid during the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date
of the Amalgamation Agreement, i.e., $0.20 per common
share in Validus case and $0.22 per common share in
IPCs case.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
The Amalgamation will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting, with Validus treated as the accounting acquirer
in accordance with FAS 141(R) under which the total
consideration paid in the Amalgamation will be allocated among
acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities
based on the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event there is an
90
excess of the total consideration paid in the Amalgamation over
the fair values, the excess will be accounted for as goodwill.
Intangible assets with definite lives will be amortized over
their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting from the
Amalgamation will not be amortized but instead will be tested
for impairment at least annually (more frequently if certain
indicators are present). In the event that management of Validus
determines that the value of goodwill has become impaired, an
accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal quarter in which
such determination is made. In the event there is an excess of
the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed
over the total consideration paid in the Amalgamation, the
excess will be accounted for as a gain to be recognized through
the income statement at the consummation of the Amalgamation in
accordance with FAS 141(R). Validus anticipates the
Amalgamation will result in an excess of the fair values of the
acquired assets and liabilities assumed over the total
consideration paid.
Sources
of Funds, Fees and Expenses
Validus estimates that the aggregate amalgamation consideration
to be paid to IPC shareholders in connection with the
Amalgamation will consist of approximately $423.8 million
in cash and that number of Validus Shares determined in
accordance with the exchange ratio. In addition, IPC
shareholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional Validus
Shares to which they may be entitled. Validus expects to have
sufficient cash and cash equivalents on hand to complete the
Amalgamation, including to pay the cash component of the
amalgamation consideration and any cash that may be required to
be paid in respect of dissenters or appraisal rights and
to pay fees, expenses and other related amounts.
It is anticipated that Validus and IPC will incur an aggregate
of approximately $65.0 million in expenses in connection
with the Amalgamation, including:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $61.0 million in financial, legal, accounting
and tax advisory fees;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $0.1 million in SEC filing fees;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $3.5 million in printing, solicitation and
mailing expenses associated with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $0.4 million in miscellaneous expenses.
|
Whether or not the Amalgamation closes, all costs and expenses
incurred in connection with the Amalgamation Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby will be paid by the party
incurring such expense, except as otherwise specifically
provided in the Amalgamation Agreement, and except that expenses
incurred in connection with filing, printing and mailing this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and the registration statement
on
Form S-4
on which it forms a part shall be shared equally by Validus and
IPC.
Validus engaged Greenhill as financial advisor with respect to
its strategic process and the Amalgamation. In connection with
Greenhills services to Validus, Validus has agreed to pay
Greenhill an aggregate fee of $10.0 million,
$2.75 million of which has already been paid and
$7.25 million of which is contingent upon the consummation
of a transaction or entry into a definitive agreement that
subsequently results in a transaction. In addition, Validus will
reimburse Greenhill for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses,
including the reasonable fees and expenses of its legal counsel.
Validus has also agreed to indemnify Greenhill and its
affiliates in connection with Greenhills service as
financial advisor against certain liabilities in connection with
their engagement, including liabilities under the
U.S. federal securities laws.
Validus has also engaged Dowling & Partners
Securities, LLC (Dowling) as capital markets advisor
with respect to the Amalgamation. In connection with
Dowlings services, Validus agreed to pay Dowling an
aggregate fee of $2.0 million. Payment of the fee to
Dowling is not conditioned on the successful consummation of the
Amalgamation. In addition, Validus will reimburse Dowling for
its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including the reasonable
fees and expenses of its legal counsel. Validus has also agreed
to indemnify Dowling and its affiliates in connection with
Dowlings services against certain liabilities in
connection with their engagement, including liabilities under
the U.S. federal securities laws.
IPCs board of directors engaged JPMorgan as its financial
advisor with respect to its strategic process and the
Amalgamation. In connection with JPMorgans services as
financial advisor to IPCs board of directors
91
in connection with IPCs strategic process and the
Amalgamation, IPC agreed to pay JPMorgan an aggregate fee equal
to 1.0% of the consideration in the transaction including the
amount of IPCs outstanding indebtedness immediately prior
to the closing of the transaction. Based on the closing price of
Validus Shares on August 4, 2009, the fee would be
approximately $17.2 million. As of the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, $3.7 million of the fee has
been paid. The remaining portion of the fee is payable upon the
closing of a significant business combination transaction,
including the Amalgamation with Validus.
As of July 8, 2009, four merchant banking funds affiliated
with Greenhill owned an aggregate of 2,571,427 Validus Shares,
and certain employees of Greenhill and its affiliates had
interests in one or more of such funds.
Dissenters
Rights of Appraisal for IPC Shareholders
Under Bermuda law, in the event of an amalgamation of a Bermuda
company with another company or corporation, any shareholder of
the Bermuda company is entitled to receive fair value for its
shares. IPCs board of directors considers the fair value
for each IPC Share to be 0.9727 of one Validus Share and
$7.50 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without
interest), which provides IPC shareholders with a value per IPC
Share of $29.4830 as of the close of the trading day immediately
preceding the public announcement of the proposed Amalgamation.
Validus shareholders have no such appraisal rights in connection
with the Amalgamation because Validus is not amalgamating.
Any IPC shareholder who is not satisfied that it has been
offered fair value for its IPC Shares and whose shares are not
voted in favor of the Amalgamation Agreement and the
Amalgamation may exercise its appraisal rights under the
Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, as amended (the Companies
Act) to have the fair value of its IPC Shares appraised by
the Supreme Court of Bermuda. Persons owning beneficial
interests in IPC Shares but who are not shareholders of record
should note that only persons who are shareholders of record are
entitled to make an application for appraisal. Any IPC
shareholder intending to exercise appraisal rights MUST file its
application for appraisal of the fair value of its IPC Shares
with the Court within ONE MONTH after the date the notice
convening the IPC special meeting is deemed to have been
received. The notice delivered with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus constitutes this notice. There are no
statutory rules or published decisions of the Court prescribing
the operation of the provisions of the Companies Act governing
appraisal rights that are set forth in Section 106 of the
Companies Act or the process of appraisal by the Court and there
is uncertainty about the precise methodology that would be
adopted by the Court in determining the fair value of shares in
an appraisal application under the Companies Act.
If an IPC shareholder votes in favor of the Amalgamation
Agreement and the Amalgamation at the IPC special meeting, such
shareholder has no right to apply to the Court to appraise the
fair value of its IPC Shares, and instead, pursuant to the terms
of the Amalgamation Agreement, and as discussed in The
Amalgamation Agreement Amalgamation
Consideration, each IPC Share held by such shareholder will
be converted into the right to receive the amalgamation
consideration. Voting against the Amalgamation, or not voting,
will not in itself satisfy the requirements for notice and
exercise of an IPC shareholders right to apply for
appraisal of the fair value of its IPC Shares.
In any case where a registered holder of IPC Shares has made an
appraisal application (a dissenting shareholder) in
respect of the IPC Shares held by such dissenting shareholder
(dissenting shares) and the Amalgamation has been
made effective under Bermuda law prior to the Courts
appraisal of the fair value of such dissenting shares then, in
the event that the fair value of the dissenting shares is later
appraised by the Court, such dissenting shareholder shall be
entitled to be paid an amount equal to the value of the
dissenting shares appraised by the Court within one month of the
Courts appraisal.
In any case where the value of the dissenting shares held by a
dissenting shareholder is appraised by the Court before the
Amalgamation has been made effective under Bermuda law, then
Validus will be required to pay the dissenting shareholder
within one month of the Courts appraisal an amount equal
to the value of the dissenting shares appraised by the Court,
unless the Amalgamation is terminated pursuant to the terms of
the Amalgamation Agreement.
The payment to an IPC shareholder of the fair value of its IPC
Shares as appraised by the Court could be less than, equal to or
more than the value of the amalgamation consideration that the
IPC shareholder would
92
have received in the Amalgamation if such IPC shareholder had
not exercised its appraisal rights in relation to its IPC Shares.
An IPC shareholder who has exercised appraisal rights has no
right of appeal from an appraisal made by the Court. The
responsibility for costs of any application to the Court under
Section 106 of the Companies Act will be in the
Courts discretion.
The relevant portion of Section 106 of the Companies Act is
as follows:
(6) Any shareholder who did not vote in favor of the
amalgamation and who is not satisfied that he has been offered
fair value for his shares may within one month of the giving of
the notice referred to in subsection (2) apply to the Court
to appraise the fair value of his shares.
(6A) Subject to subsection (6B), within one month of the Court
appraising the fair value of any shares under
subsection (6) the company shall be entitled
either
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
to pay to the dissenting shareholder an amount equal to the
value of his shares as appraised by the Court; or
|
(b) to terminate the amalgamation in accordance with
subsection (7).
(6B) Where the Court has appraised any shares under
subsection (6) and the amalgamation has proceeded prior to
the appraisal then, within one month of the Court appraising the
value of the shares, if the amount paid to the dissenting
shareholder for his shares is less than that appraised by the
Court the amalgamated company shall pay to such shareholder the
difference between the amount paid to him and the value
appraised by the Court.
(6C) No appeal shall lie from an appraisal by the Court under
this section.
(6D) The costs of any application to the Court under this
section shall be in the discretion of the Court.
(7) An amalgamation agreement may provide that at any time
before the issue of a certificate of amalgamation the agreement
may be terminated by the directors of an amalgamating company,
notwithstanding approval of the agreement by the shareholders of
all or any of the amalgamating companies.
93
THE
AMALGAMATION AGREEMENT
The following section contains summaries of selected material
provisions of the Amalgamation Agreement. These summaries are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the Amalgamation
Agreement which is incorporated by reference in its entirety and
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex A. You should read this document in its entirety
because it, and not this joint proxy statement/prospectus, is
the legal document that governs the Amalgamation.
The Amalgamation Agreement has been included to provide
investors and security holders with information regarding its
terms. It is not intended to provide any other factual
information about Validus, IPC or Validus Ltd. or any of their
respective subsidiaries or affiliates. The representations,
warranties and covenants contained in the Amalgamation Agreement
were made only for purposes of the Amalgamation Agreement and as
of specific dates; were solely for the benefit of the parties to
the Amalgamation Agreement; may be subject to limitations agreed
upon by Validus, IPC and Validus Ltd., including being qualified
by confidential disclosures between Validus and IPC made for the
purposes of allocating contractual risk among Validus, IPC and
Validus Ltd. instead of establishing these matters as facts
(such disclosures include information that has been included in
Validus and IPCs public disclosures, as well as
additional non-public information); and may be subject to
standards of materiality applicable to Validus, IPC and Validus
Ltd. that differ from those applicable to investors. Investors
are not third party beneficiaries under the Amalgamation
Agreement (except for the right to receive the amalgamation
consideration from and after the consummation of the
Amalgamation) and should not rely on the representations,
warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as
characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of
Validus, IPC or Validus Ltd. or any of their respective
subsidiaries or affiliates. Moreover, information concerning the
subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants
may change after the date of the Amalgamation Agreement, which
subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in
Validus or IPCs public disclosures or this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Structure
of the Amalgamation
Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, IPC will amalgamate with
Validus Ltd., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Validus, with
the combined entity continuing as the surviving company and
succeeding to and assuming all of the rights, properties,
liabilities and obligations of IPC and Validus Ltd., if all the
conditions provided in the Amalgamation Agreement, which are
summarized in Conditions to the Amalgamation,
are satisfied or waived. The name of the combined entity will be
Validus Ltd.
Upon closing of the Amalgamation, Validus Ltd.s board of
directors would consist of the directors serving on the board of
directors of Validus Ltd. before the Amalgamation. Upon closing
of the Amalgamation, the officers of Validus Ltd. will be the
officers serving Validus Ltd. before the Amalgamation.
Also upon the effectiveness of the Amalgamation, Validus
board of directors would consist of the directors serving on the
board of directors of Validus before the Amalgamation.
Closing;
Completion of the Amalgamation
The closing is expected to occur on the third business day after
the satisfaction or waiver of all closing conditions, which are
summarized in Conditions to the Amalgamation,
unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties.
The Amalgamation will become effective on the date on which the
certificate of Amalgamation is issued by the Registrar of
Companies in Bermuda or such other time as the certificate of
Amalgamation may provide. The application for the certificate of
Amalgamation will be filed by IPC and Validus Ltd. with the
Registrar of Companies in Bermuda on or prior to the closing
date of the Amalgamation.
Amalgamation
Consideration
At the effective time of the Amalgamation, the Amalgamation
Agreement provides that each IPC Share issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation
(including any shares held
94
by IPC shareholders that do not vote in favor of the
Amalgamation, but excluding any dissenting shares as to which
appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law,
and excluding any shares held by Validus or its subsidiaries)
will be converted into the right to receive, subject to
adjustment as described below, for each IPC common share:
|
|
|
|
|
0.9727 Validus Shares (rounded down to the nearest whole number
of Validus Shares in case there are any fractional shares);
|
|
|
|
$7.50 in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without
interest); and
|
|
|
|
cash consideration in lieu of fractional shares.
|
This consideration is collectively referred to as the
amalgamation consideration.
Fractional
Shares
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the Amalgamation. Instead, any IPC shareholder
who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
Validus Share in connection with the Amalgamation will be paid,
upon surrender of title to all IPC Shares held by such
shareholder, an amount in cash (without interest) determined by
multiplying such fraction by the average Validus share price
(such average Validus share price is determined by valuing
Validus Shares based on the volume weighted average price per
Validus Share on the NYSE for the five consecutive trading days
immediately preceding the second trading day prior to the date
of closing of the Amalgamation).
Exchange
of IPC Shares
Exchange
Agent
Prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation, Validus will
designate an exchange and paying agent (the Exchange
Agent) reasonably acceptable to IPC, for the purpose of
exchanging IPC Shares for the amalgamation consideration.
Validus will deposit with the Exchange Agent, prior to, or at,
the effective time of the Amalgamation, (1) certificates
or, at Validus option, shares in book-entry form
representing the Validus Shares to be exchanged in the
Amalgamation, (2) a cash amount necessary for the Exchange
Agent to make payments of the aggregate per share cash
consideration, (3) cash in sufficient amount to pay any
cash payable in lieu of fractional shares and (4) any
dividends or distributions to which IPC shareholders may be
entitled.
Exchange
Process
As promptly as practicable after the effective time of the
Amalgamation, Validus or the combined entity will cause the
Exchange Agent to mail to each IPC shareholder a letter of
transmittal and, if such holder holds IPC Shares in certificated
form, instructions describing the procedures for surrendering
IPC Shares in exchange for the amalgamation consideration. After
the effective time of the Amalgamation, each holder of IPC
Shares who surrenders title to such shares and delivers a duly
executed letter of transmittal (if such holder holds IPC Shares
in certificated form) together with any other documents
reasonably required by the Exchange Agent, will be able to
obtain the amalgamation consideration.
Unless otherwise required by law or Validus agreement with
the Exchange Agent, any portion of the exchange fund held by the
Exchange Agent that has not been distributed to IPC shareholders
six months following the effective time of the Amalgamation will
be delivered to Validus, upon demand, and after such transfer,
any IPC shareholder may look only to Validus for payment of the
amalgamation consideration and any dividends or distributions
with respect to Validus Shares.
Treatment
of IPC Share Options and Other IPC Equity Awards
At the effective time of the Amalgamation, all outstanding
options to purchase IPC Shares will cease to represent a right
to acquire IPC Shares and will automatically be converted into
new options to purchase, on
95
substantially similar terms, such number of Validus Shares and
at an exercise price per share determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares: the number of Validus Shares
will be equal to the product of (1) the number of IPC
Shares subject to IPC share options immediately before the
effective time of the Amalgamation and (2) the Option
Exchange Ratio (as defined below), the product being rounded, if
necessary, to the nearest whole share;
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price: the exercise price per Validus
Share purchasable upon exercise of a converted option will be
equal to (1) the per share exercise price of the IPC share
option divided by (2) the Option Exchange Ratio (as defined
below), the quotient being rounded, if necessary, to the nearest
cent.
|
Option Exchange Ratio means the sum of (1) the
exchange ratio plus (2) the quotient of (i) the per
share cash consideration divided by (ii) the closing price
of a Validus Share on the New York Stock Exchange on the last
trading day immediately preceding the effective time of the
Amalgamation.
The option adjustments shall (1) in the case of any IPC
share option that is intended to be an incentive stock
option under Section 422 of the Code, be determined
in a manner consistent with the requirements of
Section 424(a) of the Code and (2) in the case of any
IPC share option that is not intended to be an incentive
stock option, be determined in a manner consistent with
the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
At the effective time of the Amalgamation, any holder of an
outstanding right of any kind to acquire or receive IPC Shares
or share-based payments measured by the value of IPC Shares
(other than options) will have such right automatically
converted into the right to acquire or receive (1) a cash
payment equal to the product of (i) the number of IPC
Shares subject to such right immediately prior to the effective
time and (ii) the per share cash consideration and
(2) share-based payments measured by the value of (as the
case may be) the number of Validus Shares equal to the product
(rounded, if necessary, to the nearest whole number) of
(i) the number of IPC Shares subject to such right
immediately prior to the effective time and (ii) the
exchange ratio. Validus Shares received for such IPC Shares will
remain subject to the same restrictions that applied before the
Amalgamation was effective and will otherwise have the same
terms and conditions (taking into account any accelerated
vesting thereunder) as were applicable before the effective time
of the Amalgamation.
At the effective time of the Amalgamation, each performance
share unit granted under any IPC share plan or any other IPC
benefit plan shall be deemed to be converted into the right to
acquire or receive (1) a cash payment equal to the product
of (i) the number of IPC Shares subject to such performance
share unit immediately prior to the effective time and
(ii) the per share cash consideration and (2) the
number of Validus Shares equal to the product (rounded, if
necessary, to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number
of IPC Shares to which each performance share unit relates
immediately prior to the effective time and (ii) the
exchange ratio. Subject to certain exceptions, Validus Shares
received for such IPC Shares will remain subject to the same
restrictions that applied before the Amalgamation was effective
and will otherwise have the same terms and conditions (including
by taking into account any accelerated vesting thereunder) as
were applicable before the effective time of the Amalgamation.
Representations
and Warranties of the Parties in the Amalgamation
Agreement
The Amalgamation Agreement contains various customary
representations and warranties of IPC and Validus (and Validus
Ltd. with respect to specified sections) relating to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, good standing and corporate power;
|
|
|
|
capital structure;
|
|
|
|
authorization to enter into, and enforceability of, the
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of,
(1) organizational documents, (2) applicable law or
(3) material agreements, indentures or other instruments,
in each case as a result of the Amalgamation or entry into the
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
the filing, accuracy and completeness of SEC reports, the
preparation and presentation of financial statements, and the
absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws and reporting requirements;
|
|
|
|
absence of material pending or threatened legal and arbitration
proceedings and investigations;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes or events in the business or
condition of each party;
|
|
|
|
approvals of the respective boards of directors in connection
with the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the required vote of shareholders;
|
|
|
|
agreements with regulatory agencies or governmental authorities;
|
|
|
|
insurance matters, including statements and reports filed with
applicable insurance regulatory authorities;
|
|
|
|
investments and derivatives;
|
|
|
|
material and intercompany contracts;
|
|
|
|
employee benefits and executive compensation;
|
|
|
|
labor relations and other employment matters;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
real and leased properties;
|
|
|
|
brokers fees payable in connection with the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
investment advisor status;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of each partys financial advisor as to
fairness from a financial point of view;
|
|
|
|
inapplicability of takeover statutes to the Amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC only, absence of any IPC liability in
connection with termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement
(other than payment of the Max Termination Fee).
|
Some of the representations and warranties of Validus, Validus
Ltd. and IPC in the Amalgamation Agreement are qualified by
knowledge, materiality thresholds, or a material
adverse effect clause. In addition, all such
representations and warranties are qualified by the
parties disclosures filed with the SEC after
January 1, 2008 and prior to July 9, 2009. For
purposes of the Amalgamation Agreement, the material
adverse effect clause and its related definition
contemplate any change, state of facts, circumstance, event or
effect that is materially adverse to (A) the financial
condition, properties, assets, liabilities, obligations (whether
accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise), businesses or
results of operations of a party and its subsidiaries, taken as
whole, except any such effect to the extent resulting from any
of the following is excluded from the definition of material
adverse effect:
|
|
|
|
|
the execution, delivery and announcement of the Amalgamation
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
|
|
|
changes in economic, market, business, regulatory or political
conditions generally in the United States or in Bermuda or any
other jurisdiction in which such party operates or in the
Bermudian, U.S. or global financial markets except to the
extent such changes have a materially disproportionate effect on
a party relative to other similarly situated persons in the
property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
changes, circumstances or events generally affecting the
property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industries in
the geographic areas in which such party operates, except to the
extent such changes
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
have a materially disproportionate effect on such party relative
to other similarly situated persons in the property and casualty
insurance and reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes, circumstances or events resulting in liabilities under
property catastrophe reinsurance, including any effects
resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado, windstorm,
terrorist act, act of war or other natural or man-made disaster;
|
|
|
|
changes in any applicable law, except to the extent such changes
have a materially disproportionate effect on a party relative to
other similarly situated persons in the property and casualty
insurance and reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in generally accepted accounting principles or in
statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the
applicable jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance
regulatory authority, including accounting and financial
reporting pronouncements by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the
BMA), the SEC, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners and the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
except to the extent such changes have a materially
disproportionate effect on a party relative to other similarly
situated persons in the property and casualty insurance and
reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
any change or announcement of a potential change in its or any
of its subsidiaries credit or claims-paying rating or
A.M. Best rating or the ratings of any of its or its
subsidiaries businesses or securities, but not excluding
the underlying cause of such change or announcement;
|
|
|
|
a change in the trading prices or volume of such partys
capital shares, but not excluding the underlying cause of such a
change;
|
|
|
|
the failure to meet any revenue, earnings or other projections,
forecasts or predictions for any period ending after the date of
the Amalgamation Agreement, but not excluding the underlying
cause of such failure;
|
|
|
|
the commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war or armed
hostilities except to the extent any such changes have a
materially disproportionate effect on a party relative to other
similarly situated persons in the property and casualty
insurance and reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
any action or failure to act required to be taken by a party
pursuant to the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement; or
|
|
|
|
any change, state of facts, circumstance, event or effect in
connection with (1) the Max Amalgamation Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby or (2) the amalgamation
offer, offer to exchange or scheme of arrangement proposed by
Validus in connection with a proposed unsolicited transaction
with IPC that, in the case of each of clauses (1) and (2),
has been publicly disclosed by IPC in a filing with the SEC made
prior to 5:30 p.m., New York City time, at least one
business day prior to the date of the Amalgamation Agreement;
|
and/or (B) the ability of a party to perform its
obligations under the Amalgamation Agreement or to consummate
the transactions contemplated thereby on a timely basis.
In most instances, the representations and warranties of
Validus, Validus Ltd. and IPC in the Amalgamation Agreement that
are qualified by material adverse effect are
qualified only to the extent the failure of such representations
or warranties to be true and correct would not, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on Validus, Validus Ltd. or
IPC, as the case may be.
Conduct
of Business Pending the Closing of the Amalgamation
The Amalgamation Agreement requires that each of IPC and
Validus, subject to certain exceptions, as consented to in
writing by the other party or as expressly noted below as solely
applicable to IPC and its subsidiaries during the period from
the signing of the Amalgamation Agreement to the effective time
of the Amalgamation, it and its subsidiaries, among other
things, (1) will conduct its respective businesses in the
98
ordinary course consistent with past practice and use
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its business
organization, maintain permits and licenses and preserve
relationships with its employees, customers, policyholders,
reinsureds, retrocedents, agents, administrators, lenders,
investment advisors and managers, regulators, financing
providers and others having business dealings with it and
(2) will not:
|
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividend or make other distributions, with
limited exceptions including dividends to wholly owned
subsidiaries and ordinary course quarterly dividends on its
common shares or (in the case of Validus) warrants with record
and payment dates consistent with past practice and at a rate no
greater than the rate it paid in the fiscal quarter immediately
preceding the date of the Amalgamation Agreement and except that
IPC may declare and pay a one-time dividend in an aggregate
amount not to exceed any reduction in the termination fee under
the Max Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify, or propose to split, combine or
reclassify, any of its share capital, or issue or authorize or
propose the issuance or authorization of any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its
share capital;
|
|
|
|
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of its or any
of its subsidiaries share capital or any securities
convertible into or exercisable for any such shares, other than
repurchases, redemptions or acquisitions by a wholly owned
subsidiary of share capital or such other securities, as the
case may be, of another of its wholly owned subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell any shares of any class of its capital
shares, any voting debt, any share appreciation rights or any
securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for,
any rights, warrants or options to acquire such shares or voting
debt, other than Validus or IPCs issuance of Validus
Shares or IPC Shares, as applicable, as required by its existing
equity benefit plans, issuances by any of its wholly owned
subsidiaries to it or to another of its wholly owned
subsidiaries and issuances by Validus of Validus Shares in
connection with consummation of the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
amend or propose to amend its organizational documents or those
of any of its subsidiaries, except as provided in the
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, with limited
exceptions, including transactions relating to IPCs
investment assets in accordance with IPCs investment
policy, acquire or agree to acquire any equity interests in or a
substantial portion of the assets of any other entity or any
material assets, rights or properties, or sell, dispose or
otherwise encumber any of its assets, rights or properties;
|
|
|
|
amend, modify or terminate any material contract (as defined in
the Amalgamation Agreement), or cancel, modify or waive any
debts or claims held by it under, or in connection with, any
material contract;
|
|
|
|
enter into any contract or other agreement that would have been
a material contract had it been entered into before entering
into the Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
fail to comply with its investment policy, or amend, modify or
otherwise change its investment policy in any material respect,
except as may be required by (or, in its reasonable good-faith
judgment, advisable under) generally accepted accounting
principles or in statutory accounting principles prescribed by
applicable law;
|
|
|
|
enter into, purchase, sell, amend or modify any derivative
contract other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and its investment policy;
|
|
|
|
voluntarily forfeit, abandon, modify, waive, terminate or
otherwise change any of its material permits;
|
|
|
|
take any action with the knowledge and intent that it would
result in any of the conditions to the Amalgamation Agreement
not being satisfied;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would materially adversely affect the
ability of the parties to obtain any of the regulatory approvals;
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
change its methods of accounting except as required by changes
in applicable laws, generally accepted accounting principles or
in applicable statutory accounting principles or as disclosed in
filings with the SEC made prior to July 9, 2009;
|
|
|
|
make, change or revoke any material tax election, file any
amended tax return, settle any tax claim, audit action or
investigation or change its method of tax accounting (except,
with respect to any amended return or any change in the
accounting method, as required by changes in law (or any taxing
authoritys interpretation thereof)), in each case, if such
action would increase any of its tax liabilities by a material
amount;
|
|
|
|
alter or amend in any material respect its investment policy or
any existing underwriting, claim handling and related financial
protection, or the methods, guidelines or policies or any
material assumptions underlying such practices, except as may be
required by (or, in its reasonable good-faith judgment,
advisable under) generally accepted accounting principles or in
applicable statutory accounting principles or by any
governmental entity or applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
adopt any plan of complete or partial liquidation or
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;
|
|
|
|
incur, create or assume any indebtedness for borrowed money (or
modify any of the material terms of any such outstanding
indebtedness), other than (1) in replacement of existing or
maturing debt, (2) in connection with amending existing
indebtedness agreements in connection with the Amalgamation
Agreement, (3) in the ordinary course of the insurance or
reinsurance business and (4) draw-downs pursuant to
existing credit facilities and letters of credit;
|
|
|
|
grant, extend, waive or modify any material rights in or dispose
of any material intellectual property rights, subject to limited
exceptions for Validus and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any legal proceedings (excluding any
amounts previously reserved for such matters in its latest
audited balance sheet filed with the SEC and any insurance
coverage applicable thereto), other than any settlement or
compromise that does not exceed $1 million that involves
only monetary
and/or
disclosure-based relief or that arises from ordinary course
claims for insurance under insurance or reinsurance contracts
issued by a partys subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, enter into, adopt,
amend or terminate any of its benefit plans, subject to limited
exceptions, including taking such actions in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, except as required by
its existing benefit plans, increase compensation or fringe
benefits of any director, officer, employee, independent
contractor or consultant, or pay any benefit not required by any
benefit plan, subject to certain limited exceptions;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, enter into or renew
any contract providing for payment to any director, officer,
employee, independent contractor or consultant of compensation
or benefits contingent upon the occurrence of the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
with respect to Validus and its subsidiaries, enter into, adopt,
amend or terminate any of its benefit plans, subject to limited
exceptions; or
|
|
|
|
agree to or make any commitment to take or authorize, any of the
actions described above.
|
Notwithstanding the restrictions described above, Validus may
engage in certain transactions with a value, in the aggregate,
of up to $150 million, including the issuance of shares or
voting debt (provided that any such issuance of shares or voting
debt would not be reasonably expected to be adverse in any
material respect to persons who are shareholders of IPC
immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation, and
such limitation shall not apply to any such issuances for which
another exception is expressly provided in the Amalgamation
Agreement), amendments to its memorandum of association or
bye-laws, amendments to material contracts, transactions in
derivatives, the incurrence of indebtedness, and the disposition
of intellectual property rights.
100
Existing
Credit Facilities
Validus may determine in its reasonable discretion to obtain
Replacement Financing. In such a case, IPC and Validus will use
commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other in
connection with the arrangement and consummation of any such
Replacement Financing including, in the case of IPC, taking such
actions as are reasonably requested by Validus; provided
that (1) neither party is required to cooperate if such
cooperation would unreasonably interfere with the ongoing
operations of itself or its subsidiaries prior to the effective
time of the Amalgamation, (2) no party or any of its
subsidiaries will be required to incur any liability under such
Replacement Financing prior to the effective time of the
Amalgamation unless such liability is contingent upon the
occurrence of the Amalgamation and not material to IPC and its
subsidiaries (after giving effect to the Amalgamation), and
(3) IPC and Validus will be solely responsible for their
respective costs and expenses incurred in connection with such
cooperation. A failure to obtain such Replacement Financing will
not affect the obligations of the parties to consummate the
Amalgamation.
Access to
Information; Confidentiality
The Amalgamation Agreement requires that each of Validus and IPC
provide to the officers, employees and representatives of the
other party access, during normal business hours prior to the
effective time of the Amalgamation, to all of its properties,
books, contracts, records and officers and all other information
concerning its business, properties and personnel as such other
party may reasonably request, subject to certain restrictions.
The parties will hold any such information in confidence to the
extent required by, and in accordance with, the provisions of
the Amalgamation Agreement.
Agreements
to Use Commercially Reasonable Efforts
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Amalgamation
Agreement, the Amalgamation Agreement requires that each of
Validus and IPC use commercially reasonable efforts to take, or
cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done,
all things necessary or advisable under the Amalgamation
Agreement and applicable laws to consummate the Amalgamation and
the other transactions contemplated by the Amalgamation
Agreement as promptly as practicable after the date of the
Amalgamation Agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
preparing and filing all documentation to effect all necessary
applications, notices, filings and other documents and to obtain
all required regulatory approvals and all other consents;
|
|
|
|
obtaining all amendments or waivers under Validus credit
facilities as required by the Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
to the extent permissible under applicable laws, supplying any
additional information and documentary material that may be
requested pursuant to applicable laws or by applicable
authorities and causing the expiration of applicable waiting
periods, or cause the receipt of all consents from governmental
entities or required under applicable law as soon as practicable;
|
|
|
|
to the extent permissible under applicable laws, cooperating in
all respects with the other party in connection with any filing
or submission and in connection with any investigation or other
inquiry, including any proceeding initiated by any private party;
|
|
|
|
to the extent permissible under applicable laws, keeping the
other party apprised of the status of matters relating to
completion of the transactions contemplated by the Amalgamation
Agreement and promptly informing the other party of (and upon
reasonable request providing copies of) any communication in
connection with any governmental entity and of any material
communication in connection with any proceeding by any private
party;
|
|
|
|
to the extent permissible under applicable laws, permitting the
other party or its legal counsel to review prior to submission
any communication with a governmental entity or in connection
with a proceeding with a private party;
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
to the extent permissible under applicable laws, consulting with
the other party in advance of, and to the extent possible
(including to the extent permitted by a governmental entity or
other person) allowing the other party to participate in, any
meeting, conference, conference call, discussion or
communication with, any such governmental entity or, in
connection with any proceeding by any private party, with any
other person; and
|
|
|
|
taking all reasonable actions to ensure that no takeover statute
or similar regulation is or becomes applicable to the
Amalgamation, and if such regulation becomes applicable,
ensuring that the Amalgamation is consummated as soon as
possible as to minimize the effect of such regulation.
|
Additionally, IPC will take such actions as are necessary to
amend its bye-laws to reflect the IPC bye-law amendment as
outlined in the Amalgamation Agreement; provided that
such bye-law amendment is approved by IPCs shareholders.
However, neither IPC nor Validus or their respective
subsidiaries may, without the prior written consent of the other
party, (1) consent to any action for the purpose of
obtaining the regulatory approvals or (2) be required to
consent to any restriction for the purpose of obtaining the
regulatory approvals, in each case, which would be effective
prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation or which would
not be immaterial to Validus and its subsidiaries taken together
after the Amalgamation.
Restrictions
on Change in Recommendation by the Boards of Directors of IPC or
Validus
The boards of directors of IPC or Validus may not withdraw or
modify, in any manner adverse to the other party, its
recommendations in connection with the Amalgamation except if
such board has concluded in good faith, after consultation with
its outside counsel and financial advisors, that such action is
reasonably likely to be required in order for the directors to
comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable law, and
such party has not materially breached its obligations with
respect to changing its recommendation. Before a party can
change its recommendation with respect to the Amalgamation, it
must provide advance written notice of such change to the other
party and give the other party five business days to agree to
alter the terms and conditions of the Amalgamation Agreement in
a manner that removes the need for the applicable board of
directors to change its recommendation in order to prevent a
breach of its fiduciary duties. Additionally, IPC must comply
with certain other procedures in order for the IPC board of
directors to change its recommendation of the Amalgamation in
light of any Acquisition Proposal from any third party, as
described under Restrictions on Solicitation of
Acquisition Proposals by IPC.
Even if IPC or Validus has had a change in recommendation, each
will still be required to submit such matters to the respective
shareholders meeting unless the Amalgamation Agreement is
terminated for another reason.
Restrictions
on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC
The Amalgamation Agreement precludes IPC and each of its
subsidiaries and advisors from, directly or indirectly,
initiating, soliciting, encouraging or facilitating (including
by providing information) any effort or attempt to make or
implement any proposal or offer with respect to an amalgamation,
merger, reorganization, consolidation, business combination
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any share
exchange, purchase or sale involving 10% or more of its
consolidated assets (including, without limitation, shares of
its subsidiaries), or purchase or sale of, or tender or exchange
offer for, 10% or more of its total voting power or the voting
power of any of its subsidiaries (an Acquisition
Proposal). Additionally, except as described below, IPC
and each of its subsidiaries may not, and each shall use its
respective commercially reasonable efforts to prevent its
advisors from, directly or indirectly: (1) having,
participating or otherwise engaging in any discussions or
negotiations with, or providing any confidential information or
data to, any person relating to an Acquisition Proposal;
(2) approving or recommending, or proposing to approve or
recommend, any Acquisition Proposal or submitting an Acquisition
Proposal to a vote of its shareholders; or (3) approving,
recommending or proposing to approve or recommend, or executing
or entering into, any letter of intent, agreement in principle,
merger agreement, amalgamation agreement, asset purchase or
share exchange agreement, option agreement or other similar
agreement related to, any Acquisition
102
Proposal; provided, that IPC and each of its subsidiaries
and advisors may, if IPCs board of directors concludes in
good faith that such action is reasonably likely to be required
in order for such directors to comply with their fiduciary
duties under applicable law and IPC complies with certain
notification and confidentiality requirements described below,
participate or otherwise engage in discussions with or provide
confidential information or data relating to an Acquisition
Proposal.
IPC must provide Validus with written notice within
24 hours of the receipt of any Acquisition Proposal or
request that could reasonably be related to an Acquisition
Proposal from a third party indicating the identity of the third
party making such Acquisition Proposal and the material terms
and conditions of any such Acquisition Proposal and any related
documentation and correspondence. In addition, IPC must keep
Validus reasonably informed of the status and terms of any such
Acquisition Proposal or request (including any material changes
to the terms of the Acquisition Proposal).
If, prior to the required shareholder vote of IPC, the board of
directors of IPC concludes that an unsolicited bona fide written
Acquisition Proposal in respect of IPC is a superior proposal
(as defined below), after giving effect to all adjustments to
the Amalgamation Agreement that may be offered by Validus, it
may make a change to its recommendation; provided that it
must first (1) give Validus written notice indicating that
it has received an Acquisition Proposal that could reasonably be
likely to constitute a superior proposal and specifying the
identity of the person making such Acquisition Proposal as well
as the material terms of such Acquisition Proposal and
(2) allow Validus five business days, during which period
IPC and its advisors shall negotiate in good faith with Validus,
to agree to alter the terms and conditions of the Amalgamation
Agreement in a manner that removes the need for the applicable
board of directors to change its recommendation in order to
prevent a breach of its fiduciary duties. The term
superior proposal means a bona fide unsolicited
written Acquisition Proposal, which did not result from a breach
by IPC of its obligations under the Amalgamation Agreement
regarding Acquisition Proposals (as summarized above), that
would result in any person beneficially owning securities
representing 50% or more of the voting power of IPC, the voting
power of any of its subsidiaries or all or substantially all of
IPCs assets which the board of directors of IPC concludes
in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel
and financial advisors (taking into account the legal,
financial, regulatory, timing and other aspects of the
Acquisition Proposal and the person making the Acquisition
Proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation)) is in the long-term best interests of IPC,
including its shareholders, employees, communities and other
stakeholders, taking into account the long-term strategic
prospects and other benefits of the transactions contemplated by
the Amalgamation Agreement and (1) is more favorable to
IPC, its shareholders and other constituencies, (2) is
fully financed or reasonably capable of being fully financed,
reasonably likely to receive all required governmental approvals
and otherwise reasonably capable of being completed on the terms
proposed, and (3) could be reasonably likely to require the
board of directors of IPC to change its recommendation with
respect to the Amalgamation, in order to comply with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Validus is not subject to the provisions of the Amalgamation
Agreement relating to the solicitation of Acquisition Proposals.
As summarized in Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Effects of Termination; Remedies,
under certain circumstances (among others) as described in the
Amalgamation Agreement, if within 12 months of the
termination of the Amalgamation Agreement, either IPC or Validus
enters into or consummates an acquisition transaction (as
defined below) with a person (or such persons affiliate)
that made an Acquisition Proposal to IPC or Validus, as the case
may be, after the date of the Amalgamation Agreement and prior
to the relevant partys shareholder meeting, then the party
entering such acquisition transaction with such person will be
liable to the other party for a termination fee of
$16 million upon the earlier of the date of execution or
consummation of such agreement for the acquisition transaction.
In addition, IPC may be required to pay the Reimbursement Amount
to Validus (see Repayment or Retention of the
Reimbursement Amount). The term acquisition
transaction means, with respect to any person, any
amalgamation, merger reorganization, share exchange,
consolidation, business combination, recapitalization,
liquidation, dissolution or similar transaction involving it or
any of its subsidiaries or any purchase or sale of 35% of more
of the consolidated assets (including stock of its subsidiaries)
of it and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or any purchase or
sale
103
of, or tender or exchange offer for, its voting securities that,
if consummated, would result in any person (or the shareholders
of such person) beneficially owning securities representing 35%
or more of its total voting power or the voting power of any of
its subsidiaries.
Expenses
Whether or not the Amalgamation is consummated, all costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the Amalgamation Agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement
will be paid by the party incurring such expense, except as
otherwise expressly described in the Amalgamation Agreement, and
except that IPC and Validus will share equally any expenses
incurred in connection with the filing, printing and mailing of
the joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Directors
and Officers Insurance and Indemnification
Validus (or, at IPCs option prior to the effective time,
IPC) will purchase a tail policy in respect of IPCs
current officers and directors insurance with regard
to any actions occurring prior to the effective time of the
Amalgamation for six years from the effective time of the
Amalgamation. Subject to certain limitations set forth in the
Amalgamation Agreement, such tail policy will cover IPCs
directors and officers to the same extent such persons are
indemnified or have the right to advancement of expenses as of
the date of the Amalgamation Agreement. After the effective time
of the amalgamation, Validus has agreed to cause the combined
entity to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the current
directors and officers of IPC to the fullest extent permitted by
law and the former directors and officers of IPC to the extent
permitted by the bye-laws of IPC and the combined entity
immediately prior to the effective time of the Amalgamation
Agreement. The combined entity will also make advances to
current and former directors and officers of IPC to the same
extent that such persons have the right to advancement of
expenses as of July 9, 2009 (the date of the Amalgamation
Agreement). Except as required by applicable law, and until such
time as the period under which a claim against any indemnified
party with respect to any acts or omissions by any such
indemnified party occurring at or prior to the effective time of
the Amalgamation shall have expired, Validus shall not, and
shall not permit any of its subsidiaries to, amend or eliminate
the indemnification or advancement provisions of the bye-laws of
the combined entity in any manner adverse to the indemnified
parties. The parties executed the Amalgamation Agreement as a
deed, and IPCs current directors may separately sign the
Amalgamation Agreement after the date of its execution by IPC,
Validus and Validus Ltd. The IPC directors who separately
execute the Amalgamation Agreement will be third-party
beneficiaries to the Amalgamation Agreement entitled to enforce
the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement relating to indemnity
and expense reimbursement, the provision of tail insurance
policies, and the applicability of such provisions to successor
entities directly against IPC, Validus, Validus Ltd. and the
combined entity.
Employee
Benefits
As of the effective time of the Amalgamation, Validus will (or
will cause its subsidiaries to) continue to employ each person
employed by IPC or Validus and any of their respective
subsidiaries as of the effective time of the Amalgamation.
Except as outlined below, nothing contained in the Amalgamation
Agreement will restrict Validus in the future in the exercise of
its independent, good faith business judgment as to the terms
and conditions under which such employment will continue, the
duration of such employment, the basis on which such employment
is terminated or the benefits provided to any employees.
For a period of not less than one year following the closing
date of the Amalgamation, Validus will (or will cause its
subsidiaries to) make available employee benefits and
compensation opportunities substantially comparable in the
aggregate to the employee benefits and compensation
opportunities in effect for such individuals that have been
employed by Validus from IPC or the applicable IPC subsidiary
immediately prior to the closing of the Amalgamation.
Validus and its subsidiaries will ensure that any compensation
and benefit plan in which employees are eligible to participate
after the closing of the Amalgamation will give credit (except
for purposes of qualifying for subsidized early retirement
benefits or to the extent it would result in a duplication of
benefits) to service
104
by the employees with IPC and any of its subsidiaries, before
the closing of the Amalgamation, to the same extent such service
was credited prior to the closing of the Amalgamation under a
comparable compensation and benefit plan of IPC.
From and after the closing of the Amalgamation, Validus will
honor all IPC benefit plans, in each case in accordance with
their terms as in effect immediately prior to the closing of the
Amalgamation; provided that nothing in the Amalgamation
Agreement will limit the right of Validus to amend or terminate
any such plan in accordance with its terms.
Prior to the closing date of the Amalgamation, the Amalgamation
Agreement permits IPCs compensation committee to adopt a
severance benefit plan providing for severance payments to
employees of IPC and IPCRe employed as of the date of the
Amalgamation Agreement, other than any employee with the title
of executive vice president or higher or any individual that is
a party to an employment or consulting agreement. The severance
plan may provide for severance protection upon (a) a
termination without cause (as defined in the
severance plan), (b) a significant and substantial
reduction in benefits, (c) a significant and substantial
reduction in compensation rate, or (d) a forced relocation,
in each case within 12 months following a change of control
of IPC or IPCRe, in an amount equal to (i) 50% of such
employees annual base salary, as measured in the year of
termination (or three weeks base salary, as measured in
the year of termination, per year of service, if higher),
(ii) 50% of such employees annual housing allowance
(other than for non-officers), as measured in the year of
termination, (iii) a pro-rated annual bonus (other than for
non-officers), and (iv) six months medical insurance
coverage (or cash in lieu thereof).
Validus and IPC have acknowledged and agreed that each IPC
employee that holds outstanding performance share units shall
(i) fully vest in such units on the date of their
termination of employment for any reason, except a termination
for cause (as defined in IPCs 2007 incentive plan),
provided that such termination occurs within 12 months of
the closing date of the Amalgamation and (ii) be paid
within three business days after any such termination, subject
to certain timing exceptions. Validus and IPC have also
acknowledged and agreed that on the closing date of the
Amalgamation a change in control will occur under
certain IPC benefit plans and share plans.
NYSE
Listing and NASDAQ Delisting; Reservation for Issuance
Validus will use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause
all the following shares to be approved for listing and
quotation on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance,
no later than the closing date of the Amalgamation (1) all
Validus Shares to be issued in the Amalgamation to IPC
shareholders and (2) all Validus Shares to be reserved for
issuance upon exercise or vesting of the IPC share options or
other awards (the Listed Validus Shares). Validus
will take all action necessary to reserve for issuance, prior to
the Amalgamation, any Listed Validus Shares that, by their terms
and in accordance with Amalgamation Agreement, will not be
issued until after the effective time of the Amalgamation.
Validus will also use its commercially reasonable efforts to
cause the IPC Shares to no longer be listed or quoted on NASDAQ
and to be deregistered under the U.S. Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as soon
as practicable following the effective time of the Amalgamation.
Dividends
IPC and Validus will coordinate the declaration, setting of
record dates and payment dates of dividends on IPC Shares and
Validus Shares so that holders of IPC Shares do not either
receive dividends on both IPC Shares and the Validus Shares
received in the Amalgamation in respect of any calendar quarter
or fail to receive a dividend in any calendar quarter. This is
to ensure that the holders of the Validus Shares and IPC Shares
each receive the same number of quarterly dividends after
execution of the Amalgamation Agreement and prior to the
effective time of the Amalgamation with respect to such shares.
Max
Termination Fee
IPC paid to Max $50,000,000 following the execution and delivery
of the Amalgamation Agreement in respect of the termination fee
payable under the Max Amalgamation Agreement. Pursuant to the
105
Amalgamation Agreement, Validus paid to IPC $50,000,000 (the
Reimbursement Amount) in respect of, and in reliance
upon, such payment. Subject to certain exceptions, IPC must pay
the Reimbursement Amount to Validus upon termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement. See Repayment or
Retention of the Reimbursement Amount.
Validus
Proposals
Without the consent of the board of directors of IPC, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed, and subject to any third party making an Acquisition
Proposal for IPC, Validus has agreed not to make or announce any
alternative proposal during the term of the Amalgamation
Agreement to acquire IPC and (i) as soon as reasonably
practicable, to withdraw or terminate its tender offer statement
on Schedule TO and the related registration statement on
Form S-4
and all other documents related thereto filed with the SEC by
Validus prior to the date of the Amalgamation Agreement and
(ii) to terminate all solicitation efforts with respect to
its proxy statements on Schedule 14A relating to the
requisition of a special general meeting of IPC and the scheme
of arrangement proposed by Validus and all other documents
related thereto filed with the SEC by Validus prior to the date
hereof.
Max
Litigation
Neither IPC nor any of its subsidiaries may commence any
proceedings, or settle any claims, against Max in connection
with a claim for recovery of the Max Termination Fee without
Validus prior written consent (which will not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed). IPC must also inform Validus
at least three business days prior to IPC or its representatives
commencing any discussions with Max or Maxs
representatives regarding such claims.
Requisitioned
Meeting
On July 20, 2009, IPCs board of directors notified
IPCs shareholders that the special general meeting of
IPCs shareholders that was previously requisitioned by
Validus has been scheduled for December 31, 2009. If the
effective time of the Amalgamation occurs before such date, the
requisitioned special general meeting will not be held. Both IPC
and Validus have agreed that neither party will solicit proxies
in connection with the requisitioned special general meeting. At
this time, the parties do not expect that the requisitioned
special general meeting will occur.
Conditions
to the Amalgamation
Validus and IPCs respective obligations to complete
the Amalgamation are subject to the fulfillment or waiver (by
both Validus and IPC) of certain conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
IPC shall have obtained the required affirmative vote of its
shareholders to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation (the required IPC vote);
|
|
|
|
Validus shall have obtained the required affirmative vote of its
shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares to IPC
shareholders as contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Validus Shares to be issued or reserved for issuance in
connection with the Amalgamation shall have been authorized for
listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
certain regulatory filings, approvals or exemptions shall have
been made or obtained, or shall have occurred;
|
|
|
|
Validus Registration Statement on
Form S-4
regarding the Validus Shares to be issued in the Amalgamation
shall have become effective under the Securities Act of 1933,
and shall not be the subject of a stop order or any proceedings
seeking a stop order; and
|
|
|
|
no injunction or other legal restraints or prohibitions
preventing the consummation of the Amalgamation shall be in
effect.
|
106
Each of IPCs and Validus obligations to complete the
Amalgamation is also separately subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of a number of conditions including:
|
|
|
|
|
the truth and correctness of the representations and warranties
of each other party in the Amalgamation Agreement, subject to
the materiality standards provided in the Amalgamation
Agreement, and the performance, subject to the materiality
standards provided in the Amalgamation Agreement, by each party
of its obligations under the Amalgamation Agreement (and the
receipt by each party of a certificate from the other party to
such effect);
|
|
|
|
no governmental entity shall have imposed by law, or any other
action, any term, condition, obligation or restriction upon
Validus, the combined entity or their respective subsidiaries
that would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect on Validus and its
subsidiaries (including the combined entity) after the effective
time of the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
receipt by each of IPC and Validus of a tax opinion with respect
to certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
Amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
all amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities,
as reasonably determined by each of IPC and Validus to be
necessary to consummate the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated thereby, shall be in full force and
effect, or Replacement Financing shall be in full force and
effect.
|
Termination
of the Amalgamation Agreement
Termination
The Amalgamation Agreement may be terminated, at any time prior
to the effective time of the Amalgamation, by mutual written
consent of IPC, Validus and Validus Ltd. and, subject to certain
limitations described in the Amalgamation Agreement, by either
IPC or Validus, if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
a regulatory approval required by the Amalgamation Agreement to
be obtained has been denied or any governmental authority has
taken any action permanently restraining or prohibiting the
Amalgamation and such denial or action has become final and
nonappealable (unless the failure to complete the Amalgamation
by that date is due to a breach by the party seeking to
terminate the Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Amalgamation has not been consummated on or prior to
January 31, 2010 (unless the failure to complete the
Amalgamation by that date is due to a breach by the party
seeking to terminate the Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the other partys board of directors has (1) changed
its recommendation to its shareholders, (2) failed to
include such recommendation in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or (3) materially breached certain of
the non-solicitation obligations applicable to it under the
Amalgamation Agreement, as summarized in
Restrictions on Change in Recommendation by the Boards of
Directors of IPC or Validus and Restrictions
on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC;
|
|
|
|
the other party has breached a covenant, agreement,
representation or warranty that would preclude the satisfaction
of certain closing conditions and such breach is not remedied in
the 45 days following written notice to the breaching party
or is not capable of being so remedied; or
|
|
|
|
the IPC shareholders have not approved any of the matters for
which their approval is solicited for the required IPC vote or
the Validus shareholders have not approved the issuance of
Validus Shares to IPC shareholders as contemplated by the
Amalgamation Agreement.
|
Effects
of Termination; Remedies
If the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated as described
in Termination, the Amalgamation Agreement
will become void, and there will be no liability or obligation
of any party or its officers and directors
107
under the Amalgamation Agreement, except as to certain limited
provisions relating to confidentiality, the payments of
termination fees in connection with a termination (as
applicable), repayment of the Reimbursement Amount, other
transaction expenses, and the parties agreement not to
solicit proxies as described under Requisitioned
Meeting, each of which will survive the termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement, and except that no party shall be
relieved or released from any liabilities or damages arising out
of its willful breach of the Amalgamation Agreement.
If either of the parties terminates the Amalgamation Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
the non-terminating party will be required to pay the other a
termination fee of $16 million if the non-terminating
partys board of directors has changed or failed to include
in the proxy statement its recommendation to shareholders to
vote in favor of the Amalgamation, or has materially breached
certain of the non-solicitation obligations applicable to it
under the Amalgamation Agreement, as summarized in
Restrictions on Change in Recommendation by the
Boards of Directors of IPC or Validus and
Restrictions on Solicitation of Acquisition
Proposals by IPC;
|
|
|
|
if the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated by either party for
failure to complete the Amalgamation prior to January 31,
2010 and, within 12 months of the termination date, a party
or any of its subsidiaries enters into or consummates an
acquisition transaction with a person (or affiliate) that made
an Acquisition Proposal that was publicly announced or otherwise
communicated to the officers or directors of such party at any
time on or after June 12, 2009 and on or prior to
January 31, 2010, then such party must pay to the other
party a termination fee of $16 million; and
|
|
|
|
the non-terminating party will be required to pay the other a
termination fee of $16 million if the Amalgamation
Agreement is terminated on the basis of certain specified
breaches thereof (as provided therein) and, within
12 months of the termination date, the non-terminating
party or any of its subsidiaries enters into or consummates an
acquisition transaction with a person (or affiliate) that made
an Acquisition Proposal that was publicly announced or otherwise
communicated to the officers or directors of the non-terminating
party on or after June 12, 2009 and on or prior to the date
of such termination.
|
In addition to the foregoing:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus will pay the termination fee to IPC if either party has
terminated the agreement for failure to obtain the required vote
of Validus shareholders and, within 12 months of the
termination date, Validus or any of its subsidiaries enters into
or consummates an acquisition transaction with a person (or
affiliate) that made an Acquisition Proposal that was publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to Validus officers or
directors on or after the date of the Amalgamation Agreement and
prior to the date of the Validus special meeting; and
|
|
|
|
IPC will pay the termination fee to Validus if either party has
terminated the agreement for failure to obtain the required vote
of IPC shareholders and, within 12 months of the
termination date, IPC or any of its subsidiaries enters into or
consummates an acquisition transaction with a person (or
affiliate) that made an Acquisition Proposal that was publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to IPCs officers or
directors on or after June 12, 2009 and on or prior to the
date of the IPC special meeting.
|
Repayment
or Retention of the Reimbursement Amount
If the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated, IPC shall pay to
Validus an amount equal to the Reimbursement Amount promptly,
and in any event within three business days following such
termination subject to the following exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
IPC will not be required to repay to Validus, and may retain the
Reimbursement Amount (less any reduction to the termination fee
under the Max Amalgamation Agreement (the Max Fee
Reduction)) determined prior to the termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement pursuant to any final and
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
nonappealable order, decree, ruling or other action of a
governmental entity (a Reduction Determination) if
the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
either IPC or Validus due to a failure to obtain a required
governmental or regulatory approval or consent (see
Termination);
|
|
|
|
IPC because Validus board of directors has changed its
recommendation to its shareholders to vote in favor of the Share
Issuance;
|
|
|
|
IPC on the basis of certain material breaches of the
Amalgamation Agreement by Validus (see
Termination); or
|
|
|
|
either IPC or Validus due to a failure to obtain the required
vote of Validus shareholders in favor of the Share Issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated by either IPC or
Validus due to a failure to obtain the required vote of IPC
shareholders in favor of the Amalgamation, then IPC may retain
the Reimbursement Amount (less the amount of any Max Fee
Reduction determined prior to the termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement pursuant to a Reduction Determination)
upon such termination. However, if IPC thereafter enters into or
consummates an acquisition transaction that would give rise to
the payment of a termination fee to Validus as a result of IPC
or any of its subsidiaries entering into or consummating an
acquisition transaction within 12 months of the termination
date (see Effects of Termination; Remedies),
IPC will be required to repay the Reimbursement Amount to
Validus concurrently with the payment of such termination fee.
|
|
|
|
If the Amalgamation Agreement is terminated by either IPC or
Validus if the Amalgamation is not consummated prior to
January 31, 2010, then IPC will generally be permitted to
retain the Reimbursement Amount (less any Max Fee Reduction
determined prior to the termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement pursuant to a Reduction Determination). However, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) a bona fide Acquisition Proposal for IPC
and/or its
subsidiaries that is reasonably capable of being completed on
its terms is publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the
officers or directors of IPC at any time on or after
June 12, 2009, or if such an Acquisition Proposal is
announced it is irrevocably withdrawn or terminated prior to
October 31, 2009 (an IPC Competing Proposal),
and (2) no bona fide Acquisition Proposal for Validus
and/or its
subsidiaries that is reasonably capable of being completed on
its terms is publicly announced on or after July 9, 2009
and prior to the date of termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement (a Validus Competing Proposal), then IPC
shall pay to Validus an amount equal to the Reimbursement Amount
(less any Max Fee Reduction previously paid to Validus)
promptly, and in any event within three business days following
such termination; or
|
|
|
|
both an IPC Competing Proposal and a Validus Competing Proposal
shall have been made, then IPC shall only be required to repay
the Reimbursement Amount if IPC or any of its subsidiaries
thereafter enters into or consummates an acquisition transaction
that would give rise to the payment of a termination fee to
Validus (see Effects of Termination;
Remedies); provided, that if Validus enters into or
consummates an acquisition transaction that would give rise to
the payment of a termination fee to IPC (1) prior to IPC
entering into or consummating an acquisition transaction, IPC
shall be permitted to retain the Reimbursement Amount (less any
Max Fee Reduction determined prior to the termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement pursuant to a Reduction Determination),
or (2) subsequent to the repayment of the Reimbursement
Amount by IPC to Validus, then Validus shall refund the
Reimbursement Amount (less any Max Fee Reduction determined
prior to the termination of the Amalgamation Agreement pursuant
to a Reduction Determination).
|
In any case, if any Max Fee Reduction is determined pursuant to
a Reduction Determination following the termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement, then IPC shall pay to Validus, promptly,
and in any event within three business days following such
determination, such Max Fee Reduction.
109
Amendments
and Waivers Under the Amalgamation Agreement
Amendments
The Amalgamation Agreement may be amended in writing by the
parties by action taken or authorized by their respective boards
of directors, at any time before or after the approval of
matters presented in connection with the Amalgamation by the IPC
shareholders and Validus shareholders. Following such approval,
however, no amendment may be made that by law would require
further approval of IPC shareholders or Validus shareholders,
without obtaining such further approval.
Waiver
To the extent legally permissible, the parties may at any time
before the effective time of the Amalgamation do any of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time of performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party;
|
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties
contained in the Amalgamation Agreement or in any document
delivered pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement; or
|
|
|
|
waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions
contained in the Amalgamation Agreement.
|
Any extension or waiver will be valid only if set forth in
writing and signed by the party granting the waiver.
Governing
Law
The Amalgamation Agreement is governed in all respects by the
laws of Bermuda and the parties have agreed and submitted to the
exclusive jurisdiction of the Bermuda Supreme Court (and
appropriate appellate courts therefrom) for the purposes of any
litigation or other proceeding arising out of or relating to the
Amalgamation Agreement or any transaction contemplated by the
Amalgamation Agreement.
110
REGULATORY
MATTERS
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Amalgamation
Agreement, Validus and IPC have agreed to use commercially
reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions
and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or
advisable under the Amalgamation Agreement and applicable laws,
rules and regulations to close the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement as
promptly as practicable after the date of the Amalgamation
Agreement, as discussed in The Amalgamation
Agreement Agreements to Use Commercially Reasonable
Efforts.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries may consent to or take any action
without the prior written consent of the other parties for the
purpose of obtaining a regulatory approval, nor will either
party be required to consent or agree to any restriction or
limitation in order to obtain a required regulatory approval if
such action would be effective before the effective time or
would, after the effective time, not be immaterial to the
combined entity.
IPC and Validus have determined that filing of a notification
under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 is not required in connection
with the Amalgamation.
Neither Validus nor IPC is aware of any approval of, or notice
to, a U.S. insurance regulator required to consummate the
Amalgamation because neither Validus nor IPC operates a
U.S.-regulated
insurance business that would require any such approval or
notice filing. Further, neither Validus nor IPC is aware of any
approval of, or notice to, any non-U.S. insurance regulatory
authority required to consummate the Amalgamation, except in the
case of a notification filing to the Irish Financial Services
Regulatory Authority, which has already been made by Validus and
confirmation of non-objection to such notice filing has already
been obtained by Validus.
In addition, under the Bermuda Insurance Act of 1978 and
pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, Validus will file a
notification regarding the Amalgamation with the BMA within
45 days after the Closing Date. Following the Amalgamation,
any person who, directly or indirectly, becomes a holder of at
least 10 percent, 20 percent, 33 percent or
50 percent of Validus Shares must notify the BMA in writing
within 45 days of becoming such a holder or 30 days
after the date they have knowledge of having such a holding,
whichever is later. The BMA may, by written notice, object to
such a person if it appears to the BMA that the person is not
fit and proper to be such a holder. Following the effectiveness
of the Amalgamation, the BMA may require the holder to reduce
its holding of shares and direct, among other things, that
voting rights attaching to those shares will not be exercisable.
A person that does not comply with such a notice or direction
from the BMA will be guilty of an offense.
Other than the notifications described above, neither Validus
nor IPC is aware of any material governmental or regulatory
notifications or approvals required to be made or obtained, or
waiting periods required to expire after the making of a filing.
If the parties discover that other notifications or approvals
and/or
waiting periods are necessary, they will seek to make or obtain
or comply with them, although there can be no assurance that
they will be made or obtained or complied with or that any
required regulatory approvals will be granted on a timely basis
or, if granted will not include terms, conditions or
restrictions that are adverse to Validus or to IPC or the
combined entity or that would cause one or both of them to
abandon the Amalgamation, if permitted by the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement.
111
THE
VALIDUS SPECIAL MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to the
Validus shareholders in connection with the solicitation of
proxies by Validus board of directors to be voted at the
Validus special meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Date,
Time and Place
The Validus special meeting will be held at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, on
[ l ],
2009, at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda.
Purposes
of the Validus Special Meeting
Based on IPCs capitalization as of August 4, 2009,
and an exchange ratio of 0.9727, Validus estimates that it will
issue 54,959,648 Validus Shares in exchange for all
outstanding IPC Shares. This number of Validus Shares will be
greater than 20% of the total number of Validus Shares
outstanding prior to such issuance. The listing requirements of
the NYSE require that Validus shareholders approve any issuance
of Validus Shares or securities convertible into or exercisable
for Validus Shares if (a) the Validus Shares or other securities
being issued will have voting power equal to or in excess of 20%
of the voting power outstanding before such issuance or (b) the
number of Validus Shares to be issued is or will be equal to or
in excess of 20% of the number of Validus Shares or other
securities before such issuance.
At the Validus special meeting, Validus shareholders will be
asked to consider and vote on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the Share Issuance;
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment proposal in respect of the meeting for
the solicitation of additional proxies in favor of the above
proposal, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the meeting.
|
The board of directors of Validus has adopted the
Amalgamation Agreement, and authorized and approved the Share
Issuance and deems it fair, advisable and in the best interests
of Validus and its shareholders to consummate the Share
Issuance, the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated thereby. Validus board of directors
recommends that Validus shareholders vote FOR each
of the items above.
If you sign and return a proxy card or voting instruction
form without giving specific voting instructions, your shares
will be voted FOR the Share Issuance Proposal and
FOR each of the items above and as the persons named
as proxies may determine in their discretion with respect to any
other matters properly presented for a vote before the Validus
special meeting.
Even if you previously voted on the issuance of Validus Shares
at the special general meeting of Validus shareholders held on
June 26, 2009, because the composition of the consideration
being offered by Validus to IPC shareholders was subsequently
changed, your vote is necessary at the Validus special meeting
in order to approve the Share Issuance.
The Share Issuance will become effective only if such proposal
is approved by Validus shareholders and the Amalgamation
is consummated.
Record
Date and Shares Entitled to Vote
Shareholders of record, as shown on the transfer books of
Validus at the close of business on July 27, 2009 will be
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Validus special
meeting or any adjournments thereof. As of July 27, 2009,
there were 59,253,652 outstanding Validus Shares entitled
to receive notice of and to vote at the Validus special meeting,
and 19,771,422 non-voting common shares. Each Validus Share
entitles the holder of record thereof to one vote at the Validus
special meeting; however, if, and for so long as, the Validus
Shares of a shareholder, including any votes conferred by
controlled shares, would otherwise represent more than
112
9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all Validus Shares
entitled to vote on a matter, the votes conferred by such
Validus Shares will be reduced by whatever amount is necessary
such that, after giving effect to any such reduction (and any
other reductions in voting power required by Validus
bye-laws), the votes conferred by such Validus Shares represent
9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all Validus Shares
entitled to vote on such matter.
How to
Vote Your Validus Shares
The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your
Validus Shares are held.
If you are a shareholder of record, meaning that your Validus
Shares are represented by certificates or book entries in your
name so that you appear as a shareholder in the transfer books
maintained by the share transfer agent, Bank of New York Mellon,
a proxy card for voting those Validus Shares included with this
joint proxy statement/prospectus may be used. You may direct how
your Validus Shares are to be voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the
enclosed envelope; or
|
|
|
|
voting in person at the Validus special meeting by bringing the
enclosed proxy card or using the ballot provided at the meeting.
You should be prepared to present photo identification for
admission upon request or you will not be admitted to the
Validus special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
alternatively, you may use the toll-free telephone number
indicated on the proxy card to vote by telephone or visit the
website indicated in the proxy card to vote on the Internet.
|
If you own Validus Shares in street name, you should, instead of
a proxy card, receive from your bank, broker or other nominee a
voting instructions form. You can use such voting instructions
form to instruct how your Validus Shares are to be voted. As
with a proxy card, you may direct how your Validus Shares are to
be voted by completing, signing, dating and returning the voting
instructions form in accordance with the instructions received
from your bank, broker or other nominee. In addition, many banks
and brokerage firms have arranged for Internet or telephonic
instructions regarding how shares are to be voted and provide
instructions for using those services on the voting instruction
form. Please consult with your bank, broker, or other nominee if
you have any questions regarding the electronic voting of
Validus Shares held in street name. Only shareholders of record
may vote their shares in person at the Validus special meeting.
Therefore, if you own your shares in street name, you will be
entitled to attend the Validus special meeting and vote your
Validus Shares only if you have previously either arranged for
the Validus Shares of record to be transferred into your name by
the record date for the Validus special meeting or secured a
valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other
nominee that holds your shares as of the record date for the
Validus special meeting (and who has received a valid proxy or
power of attorney from the shareholder of record pursuant to a
legal proxy with power of subdelegation from the
shareholder of record as of the record date).
Validus has requested that brokerage and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries forward solicitation materials to the
beneficial owners of Validus Shares and it will reimburse the
brokers and other fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding the materials.
Quorum;
Required Vote; Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
The quorum required at the Validus special meeting is two or
more shareholders present in person and representing in person
or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued Validus Shares
throughout the meeting. An affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast at the Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is
present in accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required
to approve the Share Issuance proposal and any adjournment
proposal. In accordance with NYSE rules, banks, brokers and
other nominees who hold Validus Shares in street-name for
customers may not exercise their voting discretion with respect
to the Share Issuance. Accordingly, if you do not provide your
bank, broker or other nominee with instructions on how to vote
your street name shares, your bank, broker or other nominee will
not be permitted to vote them at the Validus special meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered
votes cast on any proposal brought before, the Validus special
meeting. Because the vote required to approve the proposals is
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, assuming a
113
quorum is present, a broker non-vote with respect to any
proposal to be voted on at the Validus special meeting will not
have the effect of a vote for or against the relevant proposal,
but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase
the relative influence of those shareholders voting.
How to
Revoke a Proxy
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before
your proxy is voted at the Validus special meeting. If you are a
shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your
proxy by: (1) delivering to Validus (Attention: General
Counsel) at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda,
a written notice of revocation of your proxy;
(2) delivering to Validus an authorized proxy bearing a
later date (including a proxy by telephone or over the
Internet); or (3) attending the Validus special meeting and
voting in person as described under How to Vote
Your Validus Shares. Attendance at the Validus special
meeting in and of itself, without voting in person at the
Validus special meeting, will not cause your previously granted
proxy to be revoked. For shares you hold in street name, you
should follow the instructions of your bank, broker or other
nominee or, if you have previously either arranged for the
Validus Shares to be transferred of record into your name by the
record date for the Validus special meeting or secured a valid
proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other
nominee that holds your shares as of the record date for the
Validus special meeting (and who has received a valid proxy or
power of attorney from the shareholder of record pursuant to a
legal proxy with a power of subdelegation from the
shareholder of record as of the record date) by attending the
Validus special meeting and voting in person.
Validus
Auditors
Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers are not expected to be
present at the Validus special meeting and accordingly will not
make any statement or be available to respond to any questions.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your Validus Shares, please contact:
199
Water Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokerage Firms, Please Call:
(212) 440-9800
or
All Others Call Toll-Free:
(888) 274-5146
Email: validus@georgeson.com
114
THE IPC
SPECIAL MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to the
IPC shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies
by IPCs board of directors to be voted at the IPC special
meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Date,
Time and Place
The IPC special meeting will be held on
[ l ],
2009, at
[ l ],
Atlantic Time, at the registered office of IPC, located at the
American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke, HM
08, Bermuda.
Purposes
of the IPC Special Meeting
At the IPC special meeting, IPC shareholders will be asked to
consider and vote on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve an amendment to IPCs bye-laws to reduce the
shareholder vote required to approve an amalgamation with any
other company from the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the
votes cast thereon at a general meeting of the shareholders to a
simple majority;
|
|
|
|
to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
to approve an adjournment proposal in respect of the IPC special
meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in favor of
any of the above proposals, if necessary; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the meeting.
|
IPCs board of directors has adopted the Amalgamation
Agreement and authorized and approved the Amalgamation of IPC
with Validus Ltd. upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Amalgamation Agreement, authorized and approved
the IPC bye-law amendment, and deems it fair, advisable and in
the best interests of IPC to enter into the Amalgamation
Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated thereby. IPCs board of directors
recommends that IPC shareholders vote FOR each of
the items above.
If you sign and return a proxy card or voting instructions
form without giving specific voting instructions your shares
will be voted FOR each of the items above and as the
person named in the proxies may determine in his or her
discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented
for a vote before the IPC special meeting.
How to
Revoke a Proxy
Any IPC shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it before its
exercise by providing IPCs Secretary with written notice
of revocation, by voting in person at the IPC meeting or by
executing a later-dated proxy; provided, however, that
the action is taken in sufficient time to permit the necessary
examination and tabulation of the subsequent proxy or revocation
before the vote is taken.
Record
Date and Shares Entitled to Vote
Shareholders of record, as shown on IPCs register of
members or branch register, at the close of business on
July 27, 2009, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the IPC special meeting or any adjournments thereof. As of
July 27, 2009, there were issued and outstanding
56,091,590 IPC Shares, with each IPC Share entitling the
holder of record on such date to one vote on a poll.
See What if I Own in Excess of 10% of the Common
Shares? for a description of the restrictions that may apply
to voting of common shares.
What
if I Own in Excess of 10% of the IPC Shares?
If the number of Controlled Shares (as defined below) of any
holder would constitute 10% or more of the combined voting power
of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares (such holder, a
10% Shareholder), such
115
holder will have the voting rights attached to its IPC Shares
reduced, in the manner provided in IPCs bye-laws, so that
it may not exercise more than approximately 9.9% of the total
voting rights attached to the issued and outstanding IPC Shares.
Controlled Shares of any person refers to all common
shares owned by such person, whether:
|
|
|
|
|
directly;
|
|
|
|
with respect to persons who are United States persons, by
application of the attribution and constructive ownership rules
of Section 958(a) and 958(b) of the Code; or
|
|
|
|
beneficially, directly or indirectly, within the meaning of
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
|
IPCs bye-laws exclude from the calculation of the 10%
voting power limitation described in the preceding paragraph any
IPC Shares owned by a bank, broker, dealer or investment advisor
that does not have or exercise the power to vote those shares
and that has only a passive investment intent as reflected in
its ability to file beneficial ownership reports on
Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act, thereby permitting
certain passive investor intermediaries to increase their share
ownership above 10% in specified circumstances without being
subject to the voting cutback.
Because the applicability of the voting power reduction
provisions to any particular shareholder depends on facts and
circumstances that may be known only to the shareholder or
related persons, IPC requests that any holder of IPC Shares with
reason to believe that it is a 10% Shareholder within the
meaning of IPCs bye-laws please contact IPC promptly so
that it may determine whether the voting power of such
holders IPC Shares should be reduced. By submitting a
proxy, a holder of IPC Shares will be deemed to have confirmed
that, to its knowledge, it is not, and is not acting on behalf
of, a 10% Shareholder.
IPCs directors are empowered to require any shareholder to
provide information as to that shareholders beneficial
share ownership, the names of persons having beneficial
ownership of the shareholders shares, relationships with
other shareholders or any other facts the directors may deem
relevant to a determination of the number of Controlled Shares
attributable to any person. The directors may disregard the
votes attached to shares of any holder failing to respond to
such a request or submitting incomplete or inaccurate
information. The directors retain certain discretion to make
such final adjustments as to the aggregate number of votes
attaching to the IPC Shares of any shareholder that they
consider fair and reasonable in all the circumstances to ensure
that no person will be a 10% Shareholder at any time.
For more information, please see the risk factor There are
limitations on the ownership, transfers and voting rights of our
shares incorporated herein by reference to the
IPC 10-K.
How to
Vote Your IPC Shares
A vote by a show of hands will be taken in the first instance on
all matters properly brought before the IPC special meeting
unless a poll is requested in accordance with the IPC bye-laws.
On a vote by show of hands, every IPC shareholder present in
person and every person holding a valid proxy will be entitled
to one vote, regardless of the number of shares owned or
represented by that person. If a poll is requested, subject to
the voting restrictions set out in IPCs bye-laws, each
shareholder present who elects to vote in person and each person
holding a valid proxy is entitled to one vote for each share
owned or represented.
The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your
IPC Shares are held. If you own shares of record, meaning that
your IPC Shares are represented by certificates or book entries
in your name so that you appear as a shareholder in the register
of members or branch register maintained by the share transfer
agent, Computershare Investor Services, an IPC proxy card for
voting those shares will be included with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You may direct how your shares are to be
voted by completing, signing and returning the IPC proxy card in
the enclosed envelope; alternatively, you may use the toll-free
telephone number indicated on the proxy card to vote by
telephone or visit the website indicated in the proxy card to
vote on the Internet.
116
If you own shares through a bank or brokerage firm, you may
instead receive from your bank or brokerage firm a voting
instructions form with this joint proxy statement/prospectus
that you may use to instruct how your shares are to be voted. As
with a proxy card, you may direct how your shares are to be
voted by completing, signing and returning the voting
instructions form in the envelope provided. Many banks and
brokerage firms have arranged for Internet or telephonic
instructions regarding how shares are to be voted and provide
instructions for using those services on the voting instruction
form.
IPC has requested that brokerage and other custodians, nominees
and fiduciaries forward solicitation materials to the beneficial
owners of its IPC Shares and it will reimburse the brokers and
other fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
for forwarding the materials.
Quorum;
Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
The quorum required at the IPC special meeting is two or more
shareholders present in person and representing in person or
proxy more than 50% of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares
(without giving effect to the limitation on voting rights of 10%
Shareholders) throughout the meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered
votes cast on any proposal brought before, the IPC special
meeting. Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes
will have no effect on the outcome of any proposal. Because the
vote required to approve the proposals is the affirmative vote
of majority of the votes cast, assuming a quorum is present, a
broker non-vote with respect to any proposal to be voted on at
the Validus special meeting will not have the effect of a vote
for or against the relevant proposal but will reduce the number
of votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of
those shareholders voting.
Required
Vote
The vote required for each of the above items is set forth below
under the description of each proposal.
117
PROPOSALS TO
BE SUBMITTED TO VALIDUS SHAREHOLDERS; VOTING
REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposal 1:
Share Issuance
Validus board of directors adopted, subject to Validus
shareholder approval at the Validus special meeting, a
resolution to approve the issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to
the Amalgamation.
Under the terms of the Amalgamation, IPC shareholders (including
IPC shareholders that do not vote in favor of the Amalgamation,
but excluding holders of any dissenting shares as to which
appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law and
excluding any shares beneficially owned by Validus, IPC or any
of their respective subsidiaries) will receive (i) 0.9727
Validus Shares and (ii) $7.50 in cash (less any applicable
withholding taxes and without interest), for each IPC share they
hold. In addition, IPC shareholders will receive cash in lieu of
any fractional Validus Share to which they may be entitled.
The Listed Company Manual for companies listed on the NYSE, on
which Validus Shares are listed, requires the approval of
Validus shareholders in connection with the issuance of common
shares or securities convertible into or exercisable for common
shares if (a) the common shares or other securities being
issued will have voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of
the voting power outstanding before such issuance or
(b) the number of common shares to be issued in or will be
equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of common shares or
other securities outstanding before such issuance. The minimum
vote that will constitute shareholder approval under the NYSE
rules is a majority of the total votes cast on the proposal.
Based on Validus and IPCs capitalizations as of
August 4, 2009, and an exchange ratio of 0.9727, Validus
estimates that former Validus shareholders will own, in the
aggregate, approximately 62% of the Validus Shares on a
fully-diluted basis and former IPC shareholders will own, in the
aggregate, approximately 38% of the Validus Shares on a
fully-diluted basis following closing of the Amalgamation,
pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is present in
accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required to approve
this proposal regarding the Share Issuance. The Amalgamation
will not close unless the Validus shareholders approve the Share
Issuance Proposal.
Validus
board of directors recommends a vote FOR this
proposal 1.
Proposal 2:
Adjournment Proposal
Validus shareholders are being asked to consider and vote on a
proposal to adjourn or postpone the Validus special meeting, in
the discretion of the persons named as proxies, to solicit
additional proxies.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is present in
accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required to approve
this proposal regarding an adjournment proposal.
Validus
board of directors recommends a vote FOR this
proposal 2.
118
PROPOSALS TO
BE SUBMITTED TO IPC SHAREHOLDERS; VOTING
REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposal 1:
IPC Bye-Law Amendment
At a meeting held on July 8, 2009, IPCs board of
directors adopted by unanimous vote, subject to the approval of
IPC shareholders, a resolution to approve an amendment to
IPCs bye-laws to reduce the shareholder vote required to
approve an amalgamation with any other company from the
affirmative vote of three-fourths of the votes cast thereon at a
general meeting of the shareholders to a simple majority. The
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the IPC
special meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with
IPCs bye-laws, is required to approve the IPC bye-law
amendment, which will become immediately effective if so
approved.
If the necessary vote of shareholders is obtained in connection
with this proposal, the IPC bye-laws will be amended and the
following will be inserted as bye-law 90 under the caption
MEMBER VOTE TO APPROVE AN AMALGAMATION:
90. Amalgamation
A resolution proposed for consideration at a general meeting to
approve the amalgamation of the Company with any other company
shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast by Members present or represented by proxy and voting at
such general meeting and the quorum for such general meeting
shall be as set out in Bye-law 39.
If the IPC bye-law amendment is approved, the affirmative vote
of a majority of the votes cast at the IPC special meeting will
be required to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation (or any other amalgamation of IPC with any other
company or corporation). If the IPC bye-law amendment is not
approved, pursuant to the Companies Act, the affirmative vote of
three-fourths of the votes cast at the IPC special meeting shall
be required to adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation (or any other amalgamation of IPC with any other
company or corporation).
IPCs
board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR
this proposal 1.
Proposal 2:
Adoption of the Amalgamation Agreement and Approval of the
Amalgamation
At a meeting held on July 8, 2009, IPCs board of
directors adopted by unanimous vote, subject to the approval of
IPC shareholders, a resolution to approve and adopt the
Amalgamation Agreement and approve of the amalgamation of IPC
with Validus Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Validus.
Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, IPC shareholders
(including IPC shareholders that do not vote in favor of the
Amalgamation, but excluding holders of any shares as to which
appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law),
as consideration for the exchange of each IPC Share in the
Amalgamation, will receive 0.9727 Validus Shares and $7.50 in
cash, less any applicable withholding tax and without interest,
and cash in lieu of fractional shares.
The Amalgamation cannot be completed unless IPC shareholders
approve and adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation. The approval by IPC shareholders of this proposal
for the adoption of the Amalgamation Agreement and approval of
the Amalgamation is a condition to the Amalgamation Agreement.
Validus may elect to terminate the Amalgamation Agreement if
such approval is not received at the IPC special meeting, as
further described under The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation Agreement
on page 107.
If IPC shareholders approve and adopt the proposed IPC bye-law
amendment to reflect a reduction in the vote of holders of IPC
Shares required to approve the amalgamation of IPC with any
other company from the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the
votes cast at a meeting of IPC shareholders at which a quorum is
present to a simple majority of the votes cast at a meeting of
IPC shareholders at which a quorum is present, as described
above, then the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast
on this proposal at the IPC special
119
meeting will be required to approve and adopt the amalgamation
agreement and approve the amalgamation. If the IPC bye-law
amendment is not approved and adopted, then the affirmative vote
of three-fourths of the votes cast on this proposal at the IPC
special meeting will be required to approve and adopt the
Amalgamation Agreement and approve the Amalgamation. The
Amalgamation will not close unless IPC shareholders approve and
adopt the Amalgamation Agreement and approve the
Amalgamation.
IPCs
board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR
this proposal 2.
Proposal 3:
Adjournment Proposal
IPC shareholders are being asked to consider and vote on a
proposal to adjourn or postpone the IPC special meeting, in the
discretion of the persons named as proxies, to solicit
additional proxies.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the IPC
special meeting, at which a quorum is present in accordance with
IPCs bye-laws, is required to approve this proposal
regarding an adjournment proposal.
IPCs
board of directors recommends a vote FOR this
proposal 3.
120
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF VALIDUS COMMON SHARES
The following table sets forth information as of July 27,
2009 regarding the beneficial ownership of Validus common
shares by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by Validus to beneficially own more than 5% of
Validus outstanding common shares,
|
|
|
|
each of Validus directors,
|
|
|
|
each of Validus named executive officers, and
|
|
|
|
all of Validus directors and executive officers as a group.
|
The information provided in the table below with respect to each
principal shareholder has been obtained from that shareholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
to Exercise of
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Beneficial Owner(1)(16)(17)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
(%)(2)
|
|
|
(%)(2)
|
|
|
Investment funds affiliated with The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc.(3),(4)
|
|
|
14,057,137
|
|
|
|
1,604,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.08
|
%
|
|
|
17.44
|
%
|
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages(5)
|
|
|
6,886,342
|
|
|
|
3,193,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.67
|
%
|
|
|
11.22
|
%
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital Partners(6)
|
|
|
8,571,427
|
|
|
|
972,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.34
|
%
|
|
|
10.63
|
%
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital, LLC(7)
|
|
|
6,986,241
|
|
|
|
784,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
%
|
|
|
8.65
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Bank of America Corp. or managed by
Bank of America Corp affiliates(3),(8)
|
|
|
6,134,530
|
|
|
|
1,067,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.30
|
%
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
Edward J. Noonan(9)
|
|
|
421,564
|
|
|
|
29,039
|
|
|
|
920,779
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
George P. Reeth(9)
|
|
|
133,084
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
523,767
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
C. N. Rupert Atkin(9)
|
|
|
166,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,120
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
Michael E. A. Carpenter(9)
|
|
|
314,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
Jeff Consolino(9)
|
|
|
59,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,964
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Matthew J. Grayson(10),(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Jeffrey W. Greenberg(10),(12)
|
|
|
6,886,342
|
|
|
|
3,203,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.68
|
%
|
|
|
11.23
|
%
|
John J. Hendrickson(10)
|
|
|
57,142
|
|
|
|
72,598
|
|
|
|
4,508
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
Sumit Rajpal(3),(4),(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.08
|
%
|
|
|
17.44
|
%
|
Sander M. Levy(10),(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.34
|
%
|
|
|
10.63
|
%
|
Jean-Marie Nessi(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandakini Puri(10),(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.30
|
%
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
Alok Singh(10),(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
%
|
|
|
8.65
|
%
|
Christopher E. Watson(10),(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (19 persons)(16)
|
|
|
337,003
|
|
|
|
128,934
|
|
|
|
3,073,596
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All holdings in this beneficial ownership table have been
rounded to the nearest whole share. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The percentage of beneficial ownership for all holders has been
rounded to the nearest 1/10th of a percentage. Total beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and includes common shares
issuable within 60 days of July 27, 2009 upon the |
121
|
|
|
|
|
exercise of all options and warrants and other rights
beneficially owned by the indicated person on that date. Fully
diluted total beneficial ownership is based upon all common
shares and all common shares subject to exercise of options and
warrants outstanding at July 27, 2009. Under Validus
Bye-laws, if, and for so long as, the common shares of a
shareholder, including any votes conferred by controlled
shares, would otherwise represent more than 9.09% of the
aggregate voting power of all common shares entitled to vote on
a matter, including an election of directors, the votes
conferred by such shares will be reduced by whatever amount is
necessary such that, after giving effect to any such reduction
(and any other reductions in voting power required by
Validus Bye-laws), the votes conferred by such shares
represent 9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all common
shares entitled to vote on such matter. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
All of the common shares beneficially owned by funds affiliated
with or managed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman,
Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs) are
non-voting. Common shares beneficially owned by entities
affiliated with Bank of America Corp. (Bank of
America) (the parent corporation of Merrill
Lynch & Co, Inc. (Merrill Lynch)) or
managed by Bank of America affiliates are non-voting. |
|
(4) |
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by Goldman Sachs (collectively,
the Goldman Sachs Funds) are GSCP V AIV, L.P.
(4,798,022 shares and 638,458.3 warrants), GS Capital
Partners V Employees Fund, L.P. (1,550,787 shares and
206,358.9 warrants), GS Capital Partners V Offshore, L.P.
(3,279,530 shares and 436,397.5 warrants), GS Capital
Partners V GmbH & Co. KG (251,708 shares and
33,495.5 warrants), GSCP V Institutional AIV, Ltd.
(2,177,093 shares and 289,698.7 warrants), GS Private
Equity Partners 1999, L.P. (1,039,607 shares), GS Private
Equity Partners 1999 Offshore, L.P. (166,143 shares), GS
Private Equity Partners 1999 Direct Investments
Funds, L.P. (29,720 shares), GS Private Equity Partners
2000, L.P. (439,293 shares), GS Private Equity Partners
2000 Offshore Holdings, L.P. (154,627 shares) and GS
Private Equity Partners 2000 Direct Investment Fund,
L.P. (170,607 shares). The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and
certain affiliates, including Goldman Sachs, which is a
broker-dealer, and the Goldman Sachs Funds may be deemed to
directly or indirectly beneficially own in the aggregate
14,057,137 of Validus common shares and 1,604,410 warrants
which are owned directly or indirectly by the Goldman Sachs
Funds. Affiliates of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman
Sachs are the general partner, managing general partner or
managing limited partner of the Goldman Sachs Funds. Goldman
Sachs is the investment manager for certain of the Goldman Sachs
Funds. Goldman Sachs is a direct and indirect, wholly owned
subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. The Goldman Sachs
Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs and the Goldman Sachs Funds share
voting power and investment power with certain of their
respective affiliates. Sumit Rajpal, The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. and Goldman Sachs each disclaim beneficial ownership of the
common shares owned directly or indirectly by the Goldman Sachs
Funds, except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein,
if any. The address for the Goldman Sachs Funds and their
affiliates is 85 Broad Street, 10th Floor, New York, New York
10004. |
|
(5) |
|
Funds managed by Aquiline Capital Partners LLC are Aquiline
Financial Services Fund L.P. (4,420,420 shares) and
Aquiline Financial Services Fund (Offshore) L.P.
(2,465,922 shares). Aquiline Capital Partners LLC owns the
warrants shown. Matthew J. Grayson and Christopher E. Watson are
senior principals at Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and Jeffrey
W. Greenberg is the managing principal of Aquiline Capital
Partners LLC. |
|
(6) |
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital Partners are
Vestar AIV Employees Validus Ltd. (90,419 shares and
10,236.3 warrants), Vestar AIV Holdings B L.P.
(71,538 shares and 8,130.9 warrants), and Vestar AIV
Holdings A L.P. (8,409,470 shares and 954,442.4 warrants).
Sander M. Levy is a managing director of Vestar Capital Partners. |
|
(7) |
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital, LLC
are New Mountain Partners II (Cayman), L.P.
(6,391,468 shares and 716,031.5 warrants), Allegheny New
Mountain Partners (Cayman), L.P. (484,642 shares and
55,392.1 warrants) and New Mountain Affiliated Investors II
(Cayman), L.P. (110,131 shares and 12,632.0 warrants). Alok
Singh is a managing director of New Mountain Capital, LLC. |
|
(8) |
|
Entities affiliated with Bank of America or managed by Bank of
America affiliates are ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P.
(4,285,714 shares and 364,803.6 warrants), Merrill Lynch
Ventures L.P. 2001 |
122
|
|
|
|
|
(1,428,571 shares and 121,601.2 warrants), GMI Investments,
Inc. (580,781.9 warrants) and Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated (420,245 shares). |
|
|
|
The general partner of ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P. is
MLGPE LTD., a Cayman Islands exempted company whose sole
shareholder is ML Global Private Equity Partners, L.P., a Cayman
Islands exempted limited partnership (ML Partners).
The investment committee of ML Partners, which is composed of
Merrill Lynch GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as the general
partner of ML Partners, and certain investment professionals who
are actively performing services for ML Global Private Equity
Fund, L.P., retains decision-making power over the disposition
and voting of shares of portfolio investments of ML Global
Private Equity Fund, L.P. The consent of Merrill Lynch GP, Inc.,
as ML Partners general partner, is required for any such
vote. Merrill Lynch GP, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Merrill Lynch Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which in turn
is a wholly owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch, which in turn is
a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America. MLGPE LTD., as
general partner of ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P.; ML
Partners, the special limited partner of ML Global Private
Equity Fund, L.P.; Merrill Lynch GP, Inc., by virtue of its
right to consent to the voting of shares of portfolio
investments of ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P.; the
individuals who are members of the investment committee of ML
Partners; and each of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc. and Merrill
Lynch, because they control Merrill Lynch GP, Inc., may
therefore be deemed to beneficially own the shares that ML
Global Private Equity Fund, L.P. holds of record or may be
deemed to beneficially own. Each such entity or individual
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
|
|
|
The general partner of Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001 is
Merrill Lynch Ventures, L.L.C. (ML Ventures), which
is a wholly owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc.
Decisions regarding the voting or disposition of shares of
portfolio investments of Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001 are
made by the management and investment committee of the board of
directors of ML Ventures, which is composed of three
individuals. Each of ML Ventures, because it is the general
partner of Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001; Merrill Lynch
Group, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, because they control ML Ventures;
and the three members of the ML Ventures investment committee,
by virtue of their shared decision making power, may be deemed
to beneficially own the shares held by Merrill Lynch Ventures
L.P. 2001. Such entities and individuals expressly disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares that Merrill Lynch Ventures
L.P. 2001 holds of record or may be deemed to beneficially own. |
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001 disclaims beneficial ownership
of the shares that ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P. holds of
record or may be deemed to beneficially own. ML Global Private
Equity Fund, L.P. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
that Merrill Lynch Ventures, L.P. 2001 holds of record or may be
deemed to beneficially own. The address for the Merrill Lynch
Funds and their affiliates is 4 World Financial Center, 23rd
Floor, New York, NY 10080. Mandakini Puri is a senior vice
president of Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity. |
|
(9) |
|
Unvested restricted shares held by Validus named executive
officers and included in common shares accumulate dividends and
may be voted. Unvested restricted shares held by Validus
named executive officers are Mr. Noonan
(180,938 shares), Mr. Reeth (153,847 shares),
Mr. Atkin (213,120 shares), Mr. Consolino
(138,350 shares) and Mr. Carpenter (1,128). |
|
(10) |
|
See the section entitled Election of Directors in
Validus Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on
March 25, 2009 for biographies of the directors, including
their relationships with certain beneficial owners of common
shares listed in this table. |
|
(11) |
|
Does not include shares and warrants beneficially owned by
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages.
Mr. Grayson and Mr. Watson each disclaim existence of
a group and beneficial ownership of the shares and warrants
owned by Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes shares and warrants beneficially owned by Aquiline
Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages.
Mr. Greenberg disclaims existence of a group and disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned
by entities affiliated with or managed by Aquiline Capital
Partners LLC. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes shares and warrants beneficially owned by entities
affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital Partners.
Mr. Levy disclaims existence of a group and disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned
by entities affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital
Partners. |
123
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Includes shares and warrants beneficially owned by entities
affiliated with Bank of America or managed by Bank of America
affiliates. Ms. Puri disclaims existence of a group and
disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares, options and
warrants owned by Bank of America or managed by Bank of America
affiliates. |
|
(15) |
|
Includes shares, options and warrants beneficially owned by
entities affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital LLC.
Mr. Singh disclaims existence of a group and disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned
by entities affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital
Group, LLC. |
|
(16) |
|
Excludes shares as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed. |
|
(17) |
|
The addresses of each beneficial owner are as follows: Funds
affiliated with or managed by Goldman, Sachs &
Company,
c/o Goldman,
Sachs & Co., 85 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004;
Aquiline Financial Services Fund L.P.,
c/o Aquiline
Capital Partners LLC, 535 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022;
Funds affiliated with or managed by Vestar,
c/o Vestar
Capital Partners, 245 Park Avenue, 41st Floor, New York, NY
10167; Funds affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital,
LLC,
c/o New
Mountain Capital, LLC, 787 Seventh Avenue, 49th Floor, New
York, NY 10019; Funds affiliated with or managed by Bank of
America,
c/o Merrill
Lynch Global Private Equity, 4 World Financial Center, 23rd
Floor, New York, NY 10080. The address of each other beneficial
owner listed is
c/o Validus
Holdings, Ltd., 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11 Bermuda. |
124
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF IPC SHARES
The table below sets forth certain information as of
July 27, 2009, (unless otherwise specified) with respect to
the beneficial ownership of IPC Shares by each person who is
known to IPC, based on filings made by such person under
Section 13(d) and Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act,
to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding IPC Shares,
each person currently serving as a director of IPC, each nominee
for director, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer, each of the two most highly compensated executive
officers of IPC other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and all directors and executive officers as a
group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
Percentage(2)
|
|
FMR LLC
|
|
|
4,576,534
|
(3)
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
3,437,100
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, California
94403-1906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Bridges
|
|
|
891
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael J. Cascio
|
|
|
155
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter S. Christie
|
|
|
891
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kenneth L. Hammond
|
|
|
891
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
L. Anthony Joaquin
|
|
|
891
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Antony P.D. Lancaster
|
|
|
891
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter J.A. Cozens
|
|
|
141,010
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephen F. Fallon
|
|
|
145,182
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John R. Weale
|
|
|
161,399
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
452,201
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares. |
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to
have beneficial ownership of common shares that such
person has the rights to acquire within 60 days. For
purposes of calculating percent ownership, each persons
holdings have been calculated assuming full exercise of
outstanding options currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days by such person and by including such persons
restricted stock units and performance share units vesting
within 60 days, but not the exercise of options held by any
other person. All amounts listed represent sole investment and
voting power unless otherwise indicated. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on 56,091,590 IPC Shares issued and outstanding at
July 27, 2009. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
According to information in the Schedule 13G/A filed on
February 17, 2009, FMR LLC had the following dispositive
powers with respect to common shares: (a) sole voting
power: none; (b) shared voting power: none; (c) sole
dispositive power: 4,965,479; and (d) shared dispositive
power: none. |
|
(4) |
|
According to information reported in the Schedule 13G/A
filed on February 6, 2009, Franklin Resources, Inc. had the
following dispositive powers with respect to common shares:
(a) sole voting power: 3,862,492; (b) shared voting
power: none; (c) sole dispositive power: 3,926,292;
(d) shared dispositive power: none. |
|
(5) |
|
Transfer-restricted IPC Shares awarded as compensation for his
services as a Director. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 81,250 IPC Shares issuable upon the exercise of options
and 2,928 transfer-restricted common shares. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 78,750 IPC Shares issuable upon the exercise of options
and 2,556 transfer-restricted common shares. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 115,750 IPC Shares issuable upon the exercise of
options and 2,637 transfer-restricted common shares. |
125
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a summary of the anticipated material
U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders
(as defined below) of IPC Shares of (i) the Amalgamation
and (ii) holding and disposing of Validus Shares received
pursuant to the Amalgamation. The statements with respect to
matters of U.S. federal income tax law contained in this
section are the opinion of Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp, counsel to
Validus, and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, counsel to IPC,
as to such tax laws (subject to the analysis, qualifications and
assumptions set forth in such statements). The statements as to
IPCs or Validus beliefs and conclusions as to the
application of such tax laws to the facts of the Amalgamation,
to IPC and to Validus represent the views of IPCs
and/or
Validus management (as the case may be) as to the relevant
facts and the application of such laws to the relevant facts and
do not represent the legal opinions of either management team or
of IPCs or Validus respective counsel.
This summary is based on provisions of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code),
Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative
rulings and judicial decisions, each as in effect as of the date
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, all of which are
subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect.
Any such change could alter the tax consequences described
herein. Validus and IPC have not requested, and do not expect to
request, any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) regarding the U.S. federal income tax
consequences described herein.
This discussion is not binding on the IRS or any court, and
there can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a contrary
position or that any contrary position taken by the IRS will not
be sustained by a court. This summary assumes that a
U.S. holder holds IPC Shares, or Validus Shares received
pursuant to the Amalgamation, as a capital asset within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property
held for investment).
For purposes of this summary, the term
U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of Validus
Shares or IPC Shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or
organized under the laws of the United States or any of its
political subdivisions;
|
|
|
|
a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a
court within the United States and the authority of one or more
U.S. persons, within the meaning of
Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code, to control all substantial
decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under
applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person; or
|
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its
income regardless of its source.
|
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes holds IPC Shares, or Validus Shares received
pursuant to the Amalgamation, the U.S. federal income tax
treatment of such partnership and each partner will generally
depend on the status and the activities of the partnership and
the partner. Partnerships that hold IPC Shares, or Validus
Shares received pursuant to the Amalgamation, and partners in
such partnerships should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences applicable to them with respect to the Amalgamation
and the holding and disposing of Validus Shares received
pursuant to the Amalgamation.
This summary does not address all of the U.S. federal
income tax consequences that may be applicable to a particular
U.S. holder of IPC Shares or Validus Shares received
pursuant to the Amalgamation. In addition, except where
specifically indicated, this summary does not address the
U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant
to particular U.S. holders in light of their individual
circumstances or to U.S. holders that are subject to
special rules, including:
|
|
|
|
|
brokers or dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
banks and other financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts;
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts,
partnerships (or any entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) and other pass-through
entities;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method
of accounting;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders who hold Validus Shares or IPC Shares as part
of a hedge, straddle, conversion transaction or other
risk-reduction strategy;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders who acquired IPC Shares pursuant to the
exercise of an employee stock option or right or otherwise as
compensation;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax
provisions of the Code;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders who own or have owned, directly, indirectly or
constructively, 10% or more of the IPC Shares;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders who will own, directly, indirectly or
constructively, 5% or more, by either vote or value, of the
Validus Shares following the Amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders of IPC Shares who validly exercise their
rights under Bermuda law to seek the determination of the fair
value of their IPC Shares in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.
|
This summary does not address the tax consequences of the
Amalgamation under state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws, or federal tax laws other than those pertaining to income
tax.
U.S. holders of IPC Shares should consult their own tax
advisors to determine the particular tax consequences to them of
the Amalgamation and of holding and disposing of Validus Shares
received in the Amalgamation (including the application and
effect of any state, local or
non-U.S. and
other tax laws).
The
Amalgamation
Tax Consequences Generally. The
U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. holder
with respect to the Amalgamation depend in part on whether the
Amalgamation will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning
of Section 368(a) of the Code. In order to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, U.S. holders of IPC Shares must receive a sufficient
amount of Validus Shares to satisfy the continuity of
interest test applicable to reorganizations under
Section 368(a) of the Code. Whether the Amalgamation meets
that test will depend on the value of the Validus Shares issued
to U.S. holders of IPC Shares in the Amalgamation relative
to the value of the total consideration received by
U.S. holders of IPC Shares, including any cash paid to
dissenting shareholders. Based on the value of Validus Shares at
the end of the day before the day the Amalgamation Agreement was
signed, it is anticipated that the continuity of interest test
will be satisfied unless a very significant number of IPC
shareholders (estimated to be in excess of 40%) exercise
applicable dissenters rights under Bermuda law or,
depending upon the percentage of dissenting shareholders, the
cash paid to dissenting shareholders is otherwise well in excess
of the amount of cash that Validus and IPC anticipate will be
paid to IPC shareholders that exercise applicable
dissenters rights, if any. Accordingly, the following
discussion assumes that the continuity of interest test will be
satisfied. However, because there is no limit on the amount of
cash that may be paid to dissenting shareholders, no assurance
can be given that the continuity of interest test will be
satisfied.
Completion of the Amalgamation is conditioned on, among other
things, the receipt by each of Validus and IPC of tax opinions
from Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp and
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, respectively, that
(1) the Amalgamation will be treated for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, (2) each of IPC and
Validus will be a party to that reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code and (3) Validus
will be treated, in respect of any shareholder who will own
after the Amalgamation less than 5% of the issued Validus Shares
(as determined under Treasury regulations
Section 1.367(a)-3(b)(1)(i))
as a corporation under Section 367(a) of the Code with
127
respect to each transfer of property thereto pursuant to the
Amalgamation. These opinions will be based on customary
assumptions, including that the Amalgamation will be consummated
in accordance with the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, and
on representation letters provided by Validus and IPC, to be
delivered at the time of closing, as to certain factual matters,
including representations that the continuity of interest test
will be met. In rendering their respective opinions,
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Cahill Gordon &
Reindel llp will
assume that the representations of IPC and Validus are accurate,
correct and complete in all respects at the time of the closing
of the Amalgamation, without regard to any qualifications as to
knowledge, belief or intent. Neither of these tax opinions will
be binding on the IRS. Neither IPC nor Validus intends to
request any ruling from the IRS as to the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the Amalgamation. The following
discussion assumes that the Amalgamation will be treated in the
manner described in the tax opinions.
A U.S. holder of IPC Shares that exchanges its IPC Shares
for Validus Shares and cash pursuant to the Amalgamation will
generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to
the lesser of (i) the amount of cash received in the
Amalgamation (excluding any cash received in lieu of a
fractional Validus Share), and (ii) the excess, if any, of
(a) the sum of the cash and fair market value of the
Validus Shares received by such U.S. holder (including the
fair market value of any fractional Validus Share deemed
received), over (b) the U.S. holders tax basis
in the IPC Shares exchanged therefor. For this purpose,
U.S. holders of IPC Shares must calculate gain (or
disallowed loss) separately for each identified block of IPC
Shares exchanged (that is, IPC Shares acquired at the same cost
in a single transaction). Cash received in lieu of a fractional
Validus Share is not taken into account in making these
computations of gain recognized in the Amalgamation. Rather,
cash received in lieu of a fractional Validus Share is treated
in the manner described below.
The aggregate tax basis of the Validus Shares received by a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares in the Amalgamation (including
the basis in any fractional Validus Share deemed received) will
be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the
U.S. holders IPC Shares exchanged in the
Amalgamation, decreased by the amount of cash received
(excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional Validus
Share) and increased by the amount of gain recognized in the
Amalgamation (including gain treated as dividend income as
described below but excluding any gain recognized with respect
to cash received in lieu of a fractional Validus Share). The
holding period of the Validus Shares received by a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation will
include the holding period of the IPC Shares exchanged in the
Amalgamation. If a U.S. holder of IPC Shares acquired
different blocks of IPC Shares at different times or at
different prices, such U.S. holders tax basis and
holding period in its Validus Shares may be determined with
reference to each block of IPC Shares exchanged.
Treatment of Gain. Subject to the passive
foreign investment company (PFIC) rules discussed
below or the potential application of Section 1248 of the
Code discussed below, any gain recognized in the Amalgamation
generally will be treated as capital gain, unless the receipt of
cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of the distribution of
a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes (as
discussed below). Any such capital gain will be long-term
capital gain if the U.S. holder has held the IPC Shares for
more than one year at the time of such exchange. Under current
law, long-term capital gain of individuals and other
noncorporate shareholders is generally subject to tax at a
maximum rate of 15%. If the receipt of cash has the effect of
the distribution of a dividend, the amount of gain will be
treated as dividend income to the extent of the
U.S. holders ratable share of IPCs accumulated
earnings and profits as calculated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Any gain of an individual or other noncorporate
U.S. holder which is treated as dividend income will
generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a
maximum rate of 15%, provided certain holding period
requirements are met (see Holding and Disposing
of Validus Shares Distributions). A corporate
U.S. holder will not be entitled to a dividends received
deduction for any gain which is treated as dividend income that
is otherwise generally available upon the receipt of dividends
distributed by U.S. corporations.
In general, the determination as to whether gain recognized by a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares has the effect of a distribution
of a dividend depends upon whether, and to what extent, the
Amalgamation reduces the U.S. holders deemed
percentage share ownership in Validus. For purposes of this
determination, a U.S. holder of IPC Shares will be treated
as if it first exchanged all of its IPC Shares solely for
Validus Shares (instead of the combination of Validus Shares and
cash actually received), and then a portion of the Validus
Shares so received were immediately redeemed by Validus for the
cash (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional
Validus Share) that the U.S. holder actually received in
the Amalgamation. Subject to the PFIC rules
128
discussed below or the potential application of
Section 1248 of the Code discussed below, the gain
recognized will be treated as capital gain if the deemed
redemption is substantially disproportionate or
not essentially equivalent to a dividend with
respect to the U.S. holder of IPC Shares.
In general, the deemed redemption will be substantially
disproportionate with respect to a U.S. holder of IPC
Shares if such U.S. holder experiences a more than 20%
reduction in its interest in Validus (both by vote and value) as
a result of the deemed redemption. In order for the deemed
redemption to be not essentially equivalent to a
dividend, the deemed redemption must result in a
meaningful reduction in the IPC shareholders
deemed percentage share ownership of Validus Shares. The IRS has
indicated that a minority stockholder in a publicly traded
corporation whose relative stock interest is minimal and who
exercises no control with respect to corporate affairs will
experience a meaningful reduction if that
stockholder experiences any reduction in its percentage stock
ownership in connection with a redemption. In applying the
foregoing tests, a U.S. holder will, under the constructive
ownership rules, be deemed to own Validus Shares that are owned
by certain related persons or entities or with respect to which
the U.S. holder owns options, in addition to the Validus
Shares actually owned by that U.S. holder. Because the
application of these tests may be complex, U.S. holders of
IPC Shares should consult their own tax advisors regarding the
possibility that all or a portion of any cash received in
exchange for IPC Shares will be treated as a dividend.
Cash In Lieu of a Fractional Validus Share. If
a U.S. holder of IPC Shares receives cash in lieu of a
fractional Validus Share, such U.S. holder will generally
be treated as having received the fractional Validus Share
pursuant to the Amalgamation and then as having had that
fractional Validus Share redeemed by Validus for cash. As a
result, a U.S. holder of IPC Shares will generally
recognize gain or loss measured by the difference between the
amount of cash received in lieu of the fractional Validus Share
and the portion of the basis of the U.S. holders
Validus Shares allocable to such fractional Validus Share.
Subject to the discussion below relating to the potential
application of Section 1248 of the Code or the PFIC rules,
such gain or loss generally will constitute capital gain or loss
and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the
U.S. holders holding period in the IPC Shares
exchanged was greater than one year as of the date of the
exchange. Long-term capital gains of individuals and other
noncorporate U.S. holders are generally eligible for
reduced rates of taxation (as discussed above). The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements. If a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares receives Validus Shares in the
Amalgamation and, immediately before the Amalgamation, owned 5%
or more, by vote or value, of the IPC Shares, such
U.S. holder will be required to file a statement with its
U.S. federal income tax return for the year of the
Amalgamation. The statement must set forth the
U.S. holders basis in, and the fair market value of,
its IPC Shares exchanged in the Amalgamation, the date of the
Amalgamation, and the name and employer identification number of
Validus and IPC. Such U.S. holder will also be required to
retain permanent records of these facts. U.S. holders of
IPC Shares that own more than 5% of IPC Shares should consult
with their own tax advisors regarding any applicable reporting
requirements.
Section 1248. Section 1248 of the
Code generally treats a U.S. holders gain from the
sale or exchange of shares in a
non-U.S. corporation
as a dividend to the extent of the
non-U.S. corporations
earnings and profits attributable to such shares during the
period that the U.S. holder held the shares (with certain
adjustments) but only if the U.S. holder was a United
States shareholder at any time during the five-year period
ending on the date of disposition when the
non-U.S. corporation
was a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) (for more
details on CFCs, see Holding and Disposing of
Validus Shares Controlled Foreign Corporation
Rules). Furthermore, if a U.S. holder would be subject
to Section 1248 with respect to a sale or exchange of its
IPC Shares before the Amalgamation but would not be subject to
Section 1248 with respect to a sale or exchange of Validus
Shares following the Amalgamation, such U.S. holder would
be required to include in income as a deemed dividend an amount
equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the sum of the cash and
fair market value of the Validus Shares received by such
U.S. holder (including the fair market value of any
fractional Validus Share deemed received), over (ii) the
U.S. holders tax basis in the IPC Shares exchanged
therefor, but only to the extent of IPCs earnings and
profits attributable to such shares during the period that the
U.S. holder held such shares (with certain adjustments).
For these purposes, any U.S. person who owns, directly or
indirectly through
non-U.S. persons,
or is considered to own under applicable constructive ownership
rules of the Code, 10% or more of the total
129
combined voting power of all IPC Shares will be considered to be
a United States shareholder. In general, a
non-U.S. insurance
company is treated as a CFC if United States
shareholders collectively own (directly, indirectly or
constructively) more than 25% of the total combined voting power
or total value of its stock, and a
non-U.S. corporation
that is not an insurance company is treated as a CFC if
United States shareholders collectively own
(directly, indirectly or constructively) more than 50% of the
total combined voting power or total value of its stock. The
constructive ownership rules applicable for these purposes are
complex, and may result in a person, such as a partnership,
constructively owning shares directly, indirectly or
constructively owned by its members. Furthermore, a United
States shareholder may in certain circumstances be
required to report a disposition of shares of a CFC by attaching
IRS Form 5471 to the U.S. federal income tax or
information return that it would normally file for the taxable
year in which the disposition occurs.
Section 953(c)(7) of the Code generally provides that
Section 1248 of the Code will also apply to the sale or
exchange of shares in a
non-U.S. corporation
by a shareholder if the
non-U.S. corporation
would be taxed as an insurance company if it were a domestic
corporation and is 25% or more owned by U.S. persons,
regardless of whether the shareholder is a United States
shareholder. Existing Treasury regulations do not address
whether Section 1248 of the Code and the requirement to
file Form 5471 would apply if the
non-U.S. corporation
is not a CFC but the
non-U.S. corporation
has a subsidiary that would be taxed as an insurance company if
it were a domestic corporation and that is a CFC by reason of
Section 953(c)(7).
Section 1248 of the Code should not apply to gain
recognized on the disposition of IPC Shares pursuant to the
Amalgamation because (1) assuming this restriction is
enforced, IPCs bye-laws prevent shareholders from owning,
directly, indirectly or constructively, 10% or more of the
voting power of the IPC Shares, and (2) IPC is not directly
engaged in the insurance business and, under proposed Treasury
regulations, Sections 953(c)(7) and 1248 of the Code appear
to be applicable only in the case of shares of corporations that
are directly engaged in the insurance business. Additionally,
Section 1248 of the Code should not apply to the
disposition of a fractional Validus Share deemed received in the
Amalgamation because (i) assuming this restriction is
enforced, Validus bye-laws prevent shareholders from
owning, directly, indirectly or constructively, 10% or more of
the voting power of the Validus Shares, and (ii) Validus is
not directly engaged in the insurance business. However, there
can be no assurance that Section 1248 of the Code and the
requirement to file Form 5471 will not apply to
(1) gain recognized pursuant to the Amalgamation or
(2) the disposition of a fractional Validus Share deemed
received in the Amalgamation. For more detail on the application
of Section 1248 of the Code, see Holding and
Disposing of Validus Shares Sale, Exchange,
Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of Validus Shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status of
IPC. A U.S. holder of IPC Shares may be
subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax rules in respect
of a disposition of IPC Shares, including a non-taxable
disposition pursuant to the Amalgamation, if IPC were classified
as a PFIC for any taxable year during which such
U.S. holder has held IPC Shares and did not have certain
elections in effect.
In general, a foreign corporation will be a PFIC if:
|
|
|
|
|
75% or more of its income constitutes passive
income; or
|
|
|
|
50% or more of its assets produce, or are held for the
production of, passive income.
|
For the above purposes, passive income is defined to
include income of the kind which would be foreign personal
holding company income under Section 954(c) of the Code,
and generally includes interest, dividends, annuities and other
investment income. The PFIC statutory provisions, however,
contain an express exception for income derived in the
active conduct of an insurance business by a corporation which
is predominantly engaged in an insurance business. This
exception is intended to ensure that income derived by a bona
fide insurance company is not treated as passive income, except
to the extent such income is attributable to financial reserves
in excess of the reasonable needs of the insurance business. IPC
believes that each of its insurance company subsidiaries is
predominantly engaged in an insurance business and does not have
financial reserves in excess of the reasonable needs of its
insurance business. The PFIC statutory provisions contain a
look-through rule stating that, for purposes of determining
whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC, such foreign
corporation shall be treated as if it received directly
its proportionate share of the income and as if it
held its proportionate share of the assets of any
other corporation in which it owns at least 25% by value of the
stock. While no explicit guidance is provided by the statutory
language, under this
130
look-through rule IPC should be deemed to own the assets
and to have received the income of all of its insurance
subsidiaries directly as insurance assets and insurance income
for purposes of determining whether IPC qualifies for the
insurance exception. This interpretation of the look-through
rule is consistent with the legislative intention generally to
exclude bona fide insurance companies from the application of
the PFIC provisions; there can, of course, be no assurance as to
what positions the IRS or a court might take in the future.
While IPC, based on the analysis above, does not believe that
it is or has been treated as a PFIC, if IPC were currently or
previously treated as a PFIC but Validus were not treated as a
PFIC for its current taxable year, the disposition of IPC Shares
in the Amalgamation might constitute a fully taxable transaction
to U.S. holders of IPC Shares for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. As discussed in greater detail below, Validus does
not believe that it will be treated as a PFIC for the current
taxable year and does not expect to become a PFIC in the
foreseeable future. U.S. holders should consult their own
tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the Amalgamation if IPC were treated as a PFIC
with respect to such U.S. holder.
Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting. Cash payments received by a
non-corporate U.S. holder of IPC Shares may, under certain
circumstances, be subject to information reporting and backup
withholding (currently imposed at a rate of 28%), unless the
U.S. holder provides proof of an applicable exemption or
furnishes its taxpayer identification number and otherwise
complies with all applicable requirements of the backup
withholding rules. Any amounts withheld from payments to a
U.S. holder under the backup withholding rules are not
additional tax and generally will be allowed as a refund or
credit against the U.S. holders U.S. federal
income tax liability, provided the required information is
timely furnished to the IRS.
Determining the actual tax consequences of the Amalgamation
to a U.S. holder of IPC Shares may be complex. They will
depend on the U.S. holders specific situation and on
factors that are not within IPCs control.
U.S. holders of IPC Shares should consult with their own
tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the Amalgamation
in their particular circumstances, including the applicability
and effect of the alternative minimum tax and any state, local
or
non-U.S. and
other tax laws and of changes in those laws.
Holding
and Disposing of Validus Shares
Distributions. Unless Validus is treated as a
PFIC (as discussed below) or as a CFC (as discussed below), the
gross amount of distributions paid to a U.S. holder with
respect to Validus Shares received in the Amalgamation will be
included in the gross income of such U.S. holder as
dividend income to the extent Validus has either accumulated
earnings and profits (measured from the inception of Validus
through the date of the distribution, and including any earnings
and profits of IPC which may, depending on the circumstances, be
inherited by Validus in the Amalgamation) or current earnings
and profits (for the entire taxable year in which the
distribution is made). Under current law, dividends paid to an
individual and other noncorporate U.S. holder with respect
to Validus Shares received in the Amalgamation in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2011, that constitute
qualified dividend income will be taxable at a
maximum tax rate of 15% if the U.S. holder held such
Validus Shares for more than 60 days during the
121-day
period that begins 60 days before the ex-dividend date and
meets certain other requirements. Dividends distributed by
Validus with respect to Validus Shares generally will be
qualified dividend income if, in the year such
dividends are received, the Validus Shares are readily tradable
on an established securities market in the United States.
Validus expects that the Validus Shares issued pursuant to the
Amalgamation will be listed on the NYSE and, if they are so
listed, these Validus Shares should be treated as readily
tradable on an established securities market in the United
States. Except as discussed below with respect to backup
withholding, distributions paid by Validus to U.S. holders
with respect to Validus Shares received in the Amalgamation will
not be subject to U.S. withholding tax. A corporate
U.S. holder will not be entitled to a dividends received
deduction that is otherwise generally available upon the receipt
of dividends distributed by U.S. corporations.
To the extent the amount of any distribution exceeds the current
and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year of
Validus, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free
return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted tax basis
of Validus Shares with regard to which the distribution was
made, and to the extent in excess of such basis, will be treated
as gain
131
from the sale or exchange of such Validus Shares.
U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the amount of distributions from Validus after the
Amalgamation that are treated as dividends for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.
Controlled Foreign Corporation Rules. If a
foreign corporation is a CFC (as described above under
The Amalgamation
Section 1248) for an uninterrupted period of
30 days or more during a taxable year, each United
States shareholder (as defined above under
The Amalgamation
Section 1248) of such corporation who owns shares in
the corporation directly, or indirectly through non-U.S.
entities, on the last day in such year on which such corporation
is a CFC must include in its gross income for U.S. federal
income tax purposes its pro rata share of the CFCs
subpart F income, even if the subpart F income is
not distributed. Subpart F income generally includes
passive investment income and insurance income. Validus
anticipates that substantially all of its (and its
subsidiaries) income is subpart F income.
Under the bye-laws of Validus that limit voting power, no
U.S. person who owns Validus Shares directly or indirectly
through one or more
non-U.S. entities
should be treated as owning (directly, indirectly through
non-U.S. entities
or constructively) 10% or more of the total voting power of all
classes of Validus Shares or shares of any of Validus
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Assuming this restriction is enforced, none of Validus
shareholders should be treated as a United States
shareholder for purposes of these rules. There can be no
assurance, however, that the CFC rules will not apply to
U.S. holders of Validus Shares, including as a result of
their indirect ownership of the stock of Validus
subsidiaries. Accordingly, U.S. persons who might,
directly, indirectly or constructively acquire 10% or more of
the Validus Shares or the shares of any of its subsidiaries
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible
application of the CFC rules.
Related Person Insurance Income Rules. Any
U.S. person who owns Validus Shares, and hence indirectly
owns shares of Validus Reinsurance Ltd., IPCRe or any of
Validus other insurance company subsidiaries, on the last
day of such insurance companys taxable year may be
required to include in its income for U.S. federal income
tax purposes its pro rata share of such insurance companys
related person insurance income (RPII) for the
taxable year if U.S. persons own, directly, indirectly or
constructively, 25% or more of the shares of such insurance
company for an uninterrupted period of at least 30 days
during the taxable year. In general, RPII means premium and
related investment income from the direct or indirect insurance
or reinsurance of any direct or indirect U.S. shareholder
of such insurance subsidiary, or any person related to such
shareholder, including Validus. U.S. persons who own shares
of an insurance company must include RPII in income only if such
companys RPII equals or exceeds 20% of its gross insurance
income in any taxable year and at least 20% of the stock of such
insurance company (measured by either voting power or value) is
owned, directly or indirectly (under complex attribution rules),
by (1) persons (including
non-U.S. persons)
who are insured, directly or indirectly, under policies of
insurance or reinsurance written by such insurance company or
(2) persons related to any such person. The amount of
income included is determined as if such RPII were distributed
proportionately to such U.S. persons on the last day of
such taxable year, regardless of whether such income is actually
distributed. A U.S. persons pro rata share of an
insurance subsidiarys RPII for any taxable year, however,
will not exceed its proportionate share of that
subsidiarys earnings and profits for the year (as
determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes).
Validus does not anticipate that any of its subsidiaries will
have RPII that equals or exceeds 20% of such subsidiarys
gross insurance income. Because some of the factors that
determine the extent of RPII in any period may be beyond
Validus control, there can be no assurance that RPII of
any of its insurance subsidiaries will not equal or exceed 20%
of its gross insurance income in any taxable year. In addition,
it may be difficult for Validus to determine whether it is 20%
or more owned (by either voting power or value), directly or
indirectly (under complex attribution rules), by insured or
reinsured persons or persons related to insured or reinsured
persons.
If the RPII rules were to apply to any of Validus
insurance subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. holders tax basis in its Validus Shares would
be increased by the amount of any RPII that such
U.S. holder includes in income;
|
|
|
|
the U.S. holder could exclude from income the amount of any
distribution by Validus to the extent of the RPII included in
income for the year in which the distribution was paid or for
any prior year (which excluded amount would be applied to reduce
the U.S. holders tax basis in its Validus
Shares); and
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
each U.S. holder who is a direct or indirect shareholder of
Validus on the last day of Validus taxable year would be
required to attach Form 5471 to its U.S. federal
income tax or information return.
|
While, in certain circumstances, a U.S. person could
exclude from income distributions with respect to RPII that a
prior shareholder included in income, that exclusion will
generally not be available to U.S. holders whose IPC Shares
are exchanged for Validus Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation,
or who acquire Validus Shares in the public trading markets and
therefore would be unable to identify the previous shareholder
and demonstrate that such shareholder previously had included
the RPII in income.
The amounts of the RPII inclusions may be subject to adjustment
based upon subsequent IRS examination. A tax-exempt organization
will be required to attach Form 5471 to its information
return in the circumstances described above. Failure to file
Form 5471 may result in penalties. In addition,
U.S. holders who at any time own 10% or more of the Validus
Shares may have an independent obligation to file certain
information returns.
There is a lack of definitive guidance interpreting the RPII
provisions. Treasury regulations interpreting the RPII
provisions of the Code exist only in proposed form. It is not
certain whether these regulations will be adopted in their
proposed form or what changes or clarifications might ultimately
be made to the proposed regulations. Accordingly, the meaning of
the RPII provisions and their application to Validus and its
subsidiaries is uncertain. In addition, there can be no
assurance that the IRS will not challenge any determinations by
Validus or any of its subsidiaries as to the amount, if any, of
RPII that should be includible in income or that the amounts of
the RPII inclusions will not be subject to adjustment based upon
subsequent IRS examination.
Foreign Tax Credit. Validus and IPC anticipate
that at least 50% (determined by voting power or value) of the
total outstanding Validus Shares may be owned by
U.S. persons. Provided that Validus is so owned, dividends
paid by Validus will be treated, for purposes of determining the
foreign tax credit limitation, as partly U.S. source and
partly
non-U.S. source,
in proportion to the source of Validus earnings and
profits for the year in which the dividend is paid. Any amounts
required to be included in a U.S. holders gross
income under the CFC rules or the RPII rules, and any amounts
treated as dividends under Section 1248 of the Code, would
also be partly
non-U.S. source
and partly U.S. source. Because the calculation of a
taxpayers foreign tax credit limitation is complex and is
dependent on the particular taxpayers circumstances,
U.S. holders of Validus Shares should consult their own tax
advisors with respect to these matters.
Tax-Exempt Shareholders. Tax-exempt entities
are generally required to treat certain subpart F insurance
income, including RPII, that is includable in income by the
tax-exempt entity as unrelated business taxable income.
Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of
Validus Shares. Subject to the discussion below
relating to the potential application of Section 1248 of
the Code or the PFIC rules, any gain or loss realized by a
U.S. holder on the sale or other taxable disposition of
Validus Shares received in the Amalgamation will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax as capital gain or loss (which will
be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for such
Validus Shares exceeds one year on the date of such sale or
disposition) in an amount equal to the difference, if any,
between the amount realized upon such sale or exchange and such
U.S. holders tax basis in its Validus Shares.
Preferential tax rates currently apply to long-term capital
gains of individuals and other noncorporate U.S. holders.
Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant
limitations under the Code. Any gain or loss will generally be
treated as U.S. source gain or loss for foreign tax credit
limitation purposes, and any gain will generally constitute
passive income for these purposes.
Section 1248 of the Code provides that if a
U.S. person sells or exchanges stock in a foreign
corporation and such person owned, directly, indirectly through
certain foreign entities or constructively, 10% or more of the
voting power of the corporation at any time during the five-year
period ending on the date of disposition when the corporation
was a CFC, any gain from the sale or exchange of the shares will
generally be treated as a dividend to the extent of the
CFCs earnings and profits (determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles) attributable to such
shares during the period that the shareholder held the shares
and while the corporation was a CFC (with certain adjustments).
A United States shareholder may in certain
circumstances
133
be required to report a disposition of shares of a CFC by
attaching IRS Form 5471 to the U.S. federal income tax
or information return that it would normally file for the
taxable year in which the disposition occurs.
Section 953(c)(7) of the Code generally provides that
Section 1248 of the Code will also apply to the sale or
exchange of shares in a
non-U.S. corporation
if the
non-U.S. corporation
would be taxed as an insurance company if it were a domestic
corporation and is 25% or more owned by U.S. persons,
regardless of whether the shareholder is a United States
shareholder or whether RPII constitutes 20% or more of the
corporations gross insurance income. Existing Treasury
regulations do not address whether Section 1248 of the Code
and the requirement to file Form 5471 would apply if the
non-U.S. corporation
is not a CFC but the
non-U.S. corporation
has a subsidiary that would be taxed as an insurance company if
it were a domestic corporation and that is a CFC by reason of
Section 953(c)(7) (although, as discussed above,
United States shareholders of Validus Shares may
have an independent obligation to file Form 5471).
Section 1248 of the Code should not apply to dispositions
of Validus Shares because (i) assuming this restriction is
enforced, Validus bye-laws prevent shareholders from
owning, directly, indirectly or constructively, 10% or more of
the voting power of the Validus Shares, and (ii) Validus is
not directly engaged in the insurance business and, under
proposed Treasury regulations, Sections 953(c)(7) and 1248
of the Code appear to be applicable only in the case of shares
of corporations that are directly engaged in the insurance
business. There can be no assurance, however, that the IRS will
interpret the proposed Treasury regulations in this manner or
that the proposed Treasury regulations will not be amended or
promulgated in final form so as to provide that
Section 1248 of the Code and the requirement to file
Form 5471 will apply to dispositions of Validus Shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Companies. Certain
adverse U.S. federal income tax rules generally apply to a
U.S. person that owns or disposes of stock in a
non-U.S. corporation
that is treated as a PFIC. In general, a foreign corporation
will be a PFIC if:
|
|
|
|
|
75% or more of its income constitutes passive
income; or
|
|
|
|
50% or more of its assets produce, or are held for the
production of, passive income.
|
If Validus were to be characterized as a PFIC, a
U.S. holder of Validus Shares would be subject to a penalty
tax resulting from sale at a gain of these Shares, or resulting
from receipt of an excess distribution with respect
to these Shares, unless such shareholder elected to be taxed
annually on these Shares regardless of whether dividends were
distributed or Shares were sold (U.S. holders should
consult their own tax advisors with respect to their ability to
make any such elections and the tax consequences of making any
such elections). In general, a shareholder receives an
excess distribution if the amount of the
distribution is more than 125% of the average distribution with
respect to the stock during the three preceding taxable years
(or shorter period during which the taxpayer held the stock). In
general, the penalty tax is equivalent to an interest charge on
taxes that are deemed due during the period the shareholder
owned the shares, computed by assuming that the excess
distribution or gain (in the case of a sale) with respect to the
shares was taxed in equal portions at the highest applicable tax
rate throughout the shareholders period of ownership. The
interest charge is equal to the applicable rate imposed on
underpayments of U.S. federal income tax for such period.
In addition to the penalty tax, if Validus were determined to be
a PFIC, any gain on the disposition of Validus Shares would be
treated as ordinary income (and hence would not be entitled to
the 15% maximum rate for long-term capital gains recognized by
individuals and other noncorporate taxpayers). Furthermore, any
dividends paid by Validus would not constitute qualified
dividends (and hence would not be entitled to the 15% maximum
rate for qualified dividends received by individuals and other
noncorporate taxpayers) if Validus is treated as a PFIC in the
year in which such dividend is paid or in the prior taxable year.
For the above purposes, passive income is defined to
include income of the kind which would be foreign personal
holding company income under Section 954(c) of the Code,
and generally includes interest, dividends, annuities and other
investment income. The PFIC statutory provisions, however,
contain an express exception for income derived in the
active conduct of an insurance business by a corporation which
is predominantly engaged in an insurance business. This
exception is intended to ensure that income derived by a bona
fide insurance company is not treated as passive income, except
to the extent such income is attributable to financial reserves
in excess of the reasonable needs of the insurance business.
Validus believes that each of its insurance company subsidiaries
is predominantly engaged in an insurance business and does not
have financial reserves in excess of the reasonable needs of its
insurance business. The PFIC statutory
134
provisions contain a look-through rule stating that, for
purposes of determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC,
such foreign corporation shall be treated as if it received
directly its proportionate share of the income and
as if it held its proportionate share of the assets
of any other corporation in which it owns at least 25% by value
of the stock. No explicit guidance is provided by the statutory
language as to whether assets and income of an insurance
subsidiary should be treated as assets and income of an
insurance business for purposes of determining whether Validus
qualifies for the insurance exception. Furthermore, there is no
explicit guidance as to what constitutes the active conduct of
an insurance business or when a corporation is predominantly
engaged in an insurance business. Although certain of
Validus insurance subsidiaries do not have their own
employees or subsidiaries with employees, Validus has been
advised by counsel that these insurance subsidiaries nonetheless
actively conduct an insurance business and are predominantly
engaged in an insurance business.
Based on the above analysis, Validus does not believe that it
will be treated as a PFIC for the current taxable year and does
not expect to become a PFIC in the foreseeable future. However,
the determination of whether Validus is a PFIC is made annually,
and is based on the activities, income and assets of Validus and
its subsidiaries, all of which are subject to change.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that Validus will not
become a PFIC in the future. U.S. holders of Validus Shares
should consult their own tax advisors with respect to how the
PFIC rules could affect the sale, exchange, redemption or other
taxable disposition of Validus Shares received in the
Amalgamation or the receipt of any distributions with respect to
such Validus Shares.
Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting. In general, information reporting will
apply to distributions made with respect to, and proceeds
received on the disposition of, Validus Shares that are paid to
a U.S. holder within the United States (and, in certain
cases, outside of the United States), unless the
U.S. holder establishes that it is an exempt recipient,
such as a corporation. Backup withholding (currently imposed at
a rate of 28%) may apply to such payment if the U.S. holder
fails to timely provide a taxpayer identification number or
certification of exempt status or fails to report dividend and
interest income in full. Backup withholding tax is not an
additional tax. A U.S. holder subject to the backup
withholding rules will be allowed a credit of the amount
withheld against such U.S. holders U.S. federal
income tax liability and, if backup withholding tax results in
an overpayment of U.S. federal income tax, such
U.S. holder may be entitled to a refund, provided that the
requisite information is correctly furnished to the IRS in a
timely manner. U.S. holders should consult their own tax
advisors as to the information reporting and backup withholding
tax rules.
THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE
ANALYSIS OF ALL TAX CONSEQUENCES APPLICABLE TO U.S. HOLDERS
RELATING TO THE AMALGAMATION AND THE HOLDING AND DISPOSING OF
VALIDUS SHARES RECEIVED PURSUANT TO THE AMALGAMATION.
U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO
THE TAX CONSEQUENCES APPLICABLE TO THEM IN THEIR PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES.
135
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Validus
and IPC
As of the date this joint proxy statement/prospectus was first
mailed to IPC shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of
100 IPC Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares,
and Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it
owns.
Validus
Validus has established written procedures for the review of
transactions between Validus and any company affiliated with
funds managed by any of Validus sponsors (a
portfolio company) or any other company in which
Validus officers or directors have a material interest.
Any such transaction must be reviewed and approved by
Validus management or the management of the operating
subsidiary entering into the transaction, and the terms of such
transaction should be arms-length or on terms that are
otherwise fair to Validus. Any such transaction will also
require prior approval of the audit committee, except
reinsurance assumed transactions with a portfolio company that
senior management has determined are ordinary course.
Furthermore, the effect, if any, of such a transaction on the
independence of any director will be considered.
The employers of or entities associated with certain directors
or their affiliates have purchased or may in the future purchase
insurance
and/or
reinsurance from Validus on terms Validus believes were and will
be no more favorable to these insureds than those made available
to other customers.
Certain members of Validus management and staff have
provided guarantees to 1384 Capital Ltd, a company formed to
indirectly facilitate the provision of Funds at Lloyds
(FAL).
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Validus compensation committee is composed of John J.
Hendrickson, Sander M. Levy, Mandakini Puri, Sumit Rajpal and
Alok Singh. Each member of Validus compensation committee,
other than Messrs. Hendrickson and Singh, has a
relationship with entities with which Validus has engaged in
certain transactions described below. Entities affiliated with
Messrs. Hendrickson and Singh acquired common shares at the
time of Validus formation and are parties to Validus
shareholder agreement described below.
Shareholders
Agreement and Related Provisions
Certain of Validus shareholders who acquired Validus
Shares prior to the date of Validus initial public
offering (the existing shareholders) and Validus
have entered into a shareholders agreement dated as of
December 12, 2005 that governs certain relationships among,
and contains certain rights and obligations of, such existing
shareholders.
In connection with any future public offerings of common shares
by Validus, the shareholders agreement grants those
existing shareholders certain rights to participate in
registered offerings by Validus of its common shares, including
demand and piggyback registration
rights. The shareholders agreement defines Aquiline
Capital Partners, LLC and its related companies (together,
Aquiline) Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, Vestar
Capital Partners, New Mountain Capital, LLC and Merrill Lynch
Global Private Equity as sponsors. So long as a
sponsor continues to beneficially hold at least
1/3
of its original common shares, a sponsor is deemed to be a
qualified sponsor. The shareholders agreement
permits qualified sponsors to make up to four demand
registrations.
These demand and piggyback registration rights are subject to
limitations as to the maximum number of shares that may be
registered if the managing underwriter in such an offering
advises that the number of common shares offered should be
limited due to market conditions or otherwise. Validus is
required to pay all expenses incurred in connection with demand
and piggyback registrations, excluding, in the case of demand
registrations, underwriting discounts and commissions.
136
Each of Goldman Sachs Capital Partners and Merrill Lynch Global
Private Equity is entitled to require pursuant to the
shareholders agreement that Validus appoint each of
Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch to act as a lead managing
underwriter for certain demand registrations; provided
that each of Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch individually is
recognized at the time as a leading underwriter for such
securities and affiliates of Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch are
qualified sponsors at such time and the terms offered are market
terms.
Additionally, the shareholders agreement provides that
existing shareholders as well as affiliates, directors,
officers, employees and agents of existing shareholders are
permitted to engage in activities or businesses that are
competitive with us. This section of the shareholders
agreement also specifically releases existing shareholders from
any obligation to refer business opportunities to Validus and
establishes that no existing shareholder has any fiduciary or
other duties to Validus.
Relationships
with Validus Founder and Sponsoring Investors and Their
Related Parties
Validus Re entered into agreements on December 8, 2005 with
BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. (BlackRock)
under which BlackRock provides investment management services of
part of its investment portfolio, as well as certain reporting
and related services in connection therewith. Accounting and
investment management fees earned by BlackRock for the year
ended December 31, 2008 were $2,243,000 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 were $451,000. Merrill Lynch
(whose parent company is Bank of America) is a shareholder of
BlackRock.
Validus Re entered into an agreement on December 8, 2005
with Goldman Sachs Asset Management and its affiliates
(together, GSAM) under which GSAM was appointed as
an investment manager of part of Validus investment
portfolio. Investment management fees earned by GSAM for year
ended December 31, 2008 were $1,404,000 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 were $358,000.
Pursuant to reinsurance agreements with PARIS RE Holdings
Limited (Paris Re), Validus recognized gross
premiums written of $6,807,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2008 and $6,606,000 during the three months
ended March 31, 2009, of which $4,412,000 was included in
premiums receivable at December 31, 2008 and $8,379,000 was
included in premiums receivable at March 31, 2009. The
earned premiums adjustment of $4,457,000 was recorded for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and the earned premiums
adjustment of $1,706,000 was recorded for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Vestar Capital entities are shareholders of
Paris Re.
Pursuant to a reinsurance agreement, Validus has ceded premiums
to Group Ark Insurance Holdings Ltd. (Group Ark) of
$1,348,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
$800,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. A
balance due to Group Ark of $600,000 was included in reinsurance
balances payable at March 31, 2009. The contract terms were
negotiated on an arms-length basis. Aquiline and its
affiliates own a majority of the ordinary shares of, and
Mr. Watson is a director of, Group Ark.
Certain members of Validus management and staff have
provided guarantees to 1384 Capital Ltd, a company formed to
indirectly facilitate the provision of FAL. Validus paid to such
management and staff in respect of such provision of FAL
$803,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $13,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2009, all of which was
included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at such
respective dates. An amount of $66,000 was included in general
and administrative expenses in respect of the reimbursement of
expenses relating to such FAL provision for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and an amount of $15,000 was included in
general and administrative expenses in respect of the
reimbursement of expenses relating to such FAL provision for the
three months ended March 31, 2009.
IPC
IPCs
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of
Related Person Transactions
IPCs written Code of Conduct requires Directors and all
employees to notify IPC of transactions involving IPC and a
member of the immediate family of a Director or an employee, or
an individual who has a close personal relationship with a
Director or an employee of IPC. Conflicts of interest are
prohibited under
137
IPCs Code of Conduct, unless they have been approved by
IPC. All Directors and officers are required to complete an
annual questionnaire to certify their compliance with IPCs
Code of Conduct.
When IPC becomes aware of a proposed or existing transaction
with a related party, the company secretary, in consultation
with management and external counsel, as appropriate, determines
whether the transaction would require proxy disclosure as a
related-party transaction. If such a determination is made,
management and the company secretary, in consultation with
external counsel, determine whether, in their view, the
transaction should be permitted, whether it should be modified
to avoid any potential conflict of interest, should be
terminated, or whether some other action should be taken. If
deemed necessary, such action is then referred to IPCs
Executive Committee, at its next meeting (or earlier, if
appropriate), for review and final determination as it deems
appropriate.
138
COMPARISON
OF SHAREHOLDERS RIGHTS
The following is a summary of the material differences between
the current rights of Validus shareholders and the current
rights of IPC shareholders. The rights of the IPC shareholders
who become Validus shareholders pursuant to the Amalgamation
will be governed by the memorandum of association and the
amended and restated bye-laws of Validus, which will remain
subject to amendment in accordance with their terms. This
summary is not intended to be complete and is qualified by
reference to Validus memorandum of association and its
amended and restated bye-laws, and IPCs memorandum of
association and its amended and restated bye-laws, as well as
the laws of Bermuda. Validus memorandum of association and
amended and restated bye-laws are incorporated by reference (as
Exhibit 3.1 to Validus Registration Statement on
Form S-1
filed on January 16, 2007 and Exhibit 3.2 to
Validus Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Amendment No. 4) filed on July 5, 2007,
respectively). IPCs memorandum of association and amended
and restated bye-laws are incorporated by reference (as
Exhibit 3.1 to IPCs Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Amendment No. 1) filed on February 9, 1996 and
Exhibit 3.2 to IPCs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on July 30, 2007, respectively).
Share
Capital
As of May 11, 2009, Validus had an authorized share capital of
$100,000,000 divided into 571,428,571 authorized common
shares, par value of $0.175 per share. As of July 15, 2009,
Validus issued and outstanding share capital consisted of
75,828,922 common shares, par value $0.175 per share. In
addition, as of March 31, 2009, Validus has granted
warrants and options convertible into 11,476,017 Validus common
shares and 3,012,854 unvested restricted shares. Upon the
exercise of all of Validus outstanding warrants and
options and the vesting of all of Validus outstanding
unvested restricted shares, there would be 90,317,793 issued and
outstanding Validus common shares. Validus common shares trade
on the NYSE.
As of May 8, 2009, IPC had an authorized share capital of
$1,850,000 divided into 150,000,000 authorized common shares,
par value of $0.01 per share, and 35,000,000 preferred shares,
par value of $0.01 per share. As of July 15, 2009,
IPCs outstanding share capital consisted of 56,089,999
common shares, par value $0.01 per share. IPC common shares
trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Assuming the consummation of the Amalgamation on March 31,
2009, as of such date, Validus would have had (i) an
authorized share capital of 571,428,571 authorized common
shares, par value $0.175 per share, and (ii) issued and
outstanding share capital of 133,984,722 common shares, par
value $0.175 per share.
Shareholders
Equity
Under Bermuda law, the excess of any consideration paid on issue
of shares over the aggregate par value of such shares must
(except in certain limited circumstances) be credited to a share
premium account. Share premium may be distributed in certain
limited circumstances, for example to pay up unissued shares
which may be distributed to shareholders in proportion to their
holdings, but is otherwise subject to limitation, and cannot be
paid to shareholders as a dividend.
A Bermuda company may also create a contributed surplus account
and may credit to such account any cash and other property paid
or transferred to the company as sole beneficial owner (other
than in connection with the issuance of shares). Unlike share
premium arising upon the issuance of shares, the amount standing
to the credit of a companys contributed surplus account
may be distributed to shareholders subject to the solvency of
the company. Please see Dividends and
Distributions of Contributed Surplus. As of March 31,
2009, Validus had paid in nominal share capital of
$13.3 million, and a share premium account of
$1,419.6 million. As of March 31, 2009, IPC had paid
in nominal share capital of $0.6 million, and a share
premium account of $1,091.5 million.
139
Organizational
Documents
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The rights of Validus shareholders are currently governed by
its memorandum of association and amended and restated bye- laws
and by Bermuda law. There is also a shareholder agreement dated
December 7, 2005.
|
|
The rights of IPC shareholders are currently governed by its
memorandum of association and amended and restated bye-laws and
by Bermuda law.
|
Limitation
on Voting Rights
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
If the number of Controlled Shares of any shareholder or group
of related shareholders would constitute more than 9.09% of the
aggregate voting power of all common shares entitled to vote on
a matter, the votes conferred by such Controlled Shares will be
reduced, such that the vote conferred by such shares represent
9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all common shares
entitled to vote on such matter.
A
Controlled Share of any person refers to all
(i) voting and non-voting common shares,
(ii) securities convertible into or exchangeable into
voting or non- voting common shares, and (iii) options,
warrants or other rights to acquire voting or non- voting common
shares that a person is deemed to own directly, indirectly or
constructively within the meaning of (x) Section 958
of the Code or (y) Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange
Act.
|
|
If the number of Controlled Shares of any holder or group or
related shareholders would constitute 10% or more of the
combined voting power of the issued and outstanding common
shares, the voting power of this shareholder or group of related
shareholders will be reduced so that the voting power is not
more than approximately 9.9% of the total voting rights attached
to the issued and outstanding common shares.
A
Controlled Share of any person refers to all common
shares, owned by such person whether (i) directly; (ii) for a
U.S. person, by application of the rules of Section 958(a) and
958(b) of the Code; or (iii) beneficially, directly or
indirectly, within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
|
Ownership
Limitation
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus is authorized to request information from any holder of
shares and has the right to repurchase shares (other than shares
that have been sold pursuant to an effective registration
statement under the Securities Act) if the board of directors
determines that such repurchase is required in order to avoid or
ameliorate adverse legal, tax or regulatory consequences or if
such holder has undergone a Change of Control. Similar
restrictions apply to Validus ability to redeem shares.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, IPCs directors are required to
decline to register a transfer of shares if they have reason to
believe that the result of such transfer would be to increase
the total number of Controlled Shares of any person to 10% or
more of the shares of IPC without giving effect to the
limitation on voting rights described above. Similar
restrictions apply to IPCs ability to issue, redeem or
repurchase shares.
|
|
|
|
Change of Control in the Validus bye-laws means the
occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) a
majority of the board of directors (or equivalent governing
body) of a shareholder shall consist of persons who were not
(a) a member of the board of directors (or equivalent
governing body) of such shareholder on the December 7, 2005
or (b) nominated for election or elected to the board of
directors (or equivalent governing body) of such shareholder,
with the affirmative vote of a majority of
|
|
IPC
directors also may, in their absolute discretion, each decline
to register the transfer of any shares if they have reason to
believe (1) that the transfer may expose the company, any of its
subsidiaries, any shareholder or any person ceding insurance to
IPC or any of its subsidiaries to adverse tax or regulatory
treatment in any jurisdiction or (2) that registration of the
transfer under the Securities Act or under any U.S. state
securities laws or under the laws of any other jurisdiction is
required and such registration has
|
140
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
persons who were members of such board of directors (or
equivalent governing body) at the time of such nomination or
election or (ii) the acquisition by any person or group of
the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or direct the voting
of securities having more than 50% of the ordinary voting power
for the election of the directors of a shareholder (other than
certain permitted transferees, persons, groups or their
Affiliates who had such power when such shareholder first became
a shareholder or acquisitions approved in advance by a majority
of the members of the board of directors (or equivalent
governing body) of such shareholder or upon the death or
disability of a natural person).
|
|
not been duly effected. In addition, IPCs directors will
decline to approve or register a transfer of shares unless all
applicable consents, authorizations, permissions or approvals of
any governmental body or agency in Bermuda, the United States or
any other applicable jurisdiction required to be obtained prior
to such transfer will have been obtained.
The
IPC bye-laws also provide that its board of directors may
suspend the registration of transfers for any reason and for
such periods as it may determine, provided that it may not
suspend the registration of transfers for more than 45 days
in any period of 365 consecutive days.
IPC
is authorized to request information from any holder or
prospective acquirer of shares as necessary to give effect to
the transfer, issuance and repurchase restrictions described
above, and may decline to effect any transaction if complete and
accurate information is not received as requested.
Pursuant to the IPC bye-laws, if the directors of IPC refuse to
register a transfer for any reason, they must notify the
proposed transferor and transferee within 30 days of such
refusal. Bermuda law, unless the IPC bye-laws otherwise provide,
requires a 90 day notice period of such refusal to register
a transfer.
|
Dividends
and Distributions of Contributed Surplus
Under Bermuda law, a company may pay dividends on its issued and
outstanding shares in accordance with the companys
bye-laws and the rights attaching to the companys shares.
Warrants and options do not normally carry a right to a
dividend. Dividends may be declared by a companys board of
directors, out of any funds of the company legally available for
the payment of such dividends, subject to any preferred dividend
right of any holders of any preference shares from time to time.
Bermuda law does not permit payment of dividends or
distributions of contributed surplus by a company if there are
reasonable grounds for believing:
(i) the company is, or would, after the payment is made be,
unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or
(ii) that the realizable value of the companys assets
would be less, as a result of the payment, than the aggregate of
its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, the board of Validus has the power
to declare dividends on its common shares and its common share
equivalents for which its outstanding warrants are then
exercisable and to determine whether such dividends are to be
paid in cash or wholly or partly in specie and to fix the value
for distribution in specie of any assets. No unpaid dividend
shall bear interest against Validus.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board of IPC has the power to
declare dividends on its common shares, and to determine whether
such dividends are to be paid in cash or wholly or partly in
specie and to fix the value of any assets forming the subject of
a dividend in specie. No unpaid dividend shall bear interest
against IPC.
|
141
Right to
Call Special General Meeting
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws provide that special general meetings of
the shareholders may be called only by Validus
(i) chairman of the board, (ii) any two directors who
are directors at the time the bye-laws first become effective on
July 24, 2007, or (iii) a majority of the board.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws provide that a special general meeting of the
shareholders may be called by IPCs (i) chairman of the
board, (ii) any two directors, (iii) any director and the
secretary of the company or (iv) the board.
|
Bermuda law also requires the board to call a special general
meeting upon the requisition of shareholders holding not less
than one-tenth of the
paid-up
share capital of Validus as at the date of the deposit.
|
|
Bermuda law and IPC bye-laws also require the board to call a
special general meeting upon the requisition of the shareholders
holding not less than one-tenth of the paid up share capital of
IPC as at the date of the deposit.
|
Notice of
Shareholder Proposals and Nomination of Candidates by
Shareholders
Under Bermuda law, shareholders may, at their own expense
(unless the company otherwise resolves), as set forth below,
require a company to give notice of any resolution that
shareholders can properly propose at the next annual general
meeting
and/or to
circulate a statement (of not more than 1000 words) in respect
of any matter referred to in a proposed resolution or any
business to be conducted at that general meeting. The number of
shareholders necessary for such a request is either the number
of shareholders representing not less than one-twentieth of the
total voting rights of all the shareholders having at the date
of the request a right to vote at the meeting to which the
request relates, or not less than 100 shareholders. Each
such written request is referred to in this section as a
Shareholder Notice.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws are silent on matters relating to notice
of shareholder proposals and nominations of candidates.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws are silent on matters relating to notice of
shareholder proposals. The IPC bye-laws provide that candidates
for election as directors be nominated by the IPC board of
directors, except in the case of replacing directors who have
been removed by IPC shareholders.
|
Shareholder
Action by Written Consent
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, a resolution may only be passed by
written consent to be signed by all of the shareholders who at
the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend a
shareholder meeting and vote on the resolution.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, a resolution may only be passed by
written consent to be signed by all of the shareholders who at
the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend a
shareholder meeting and vote on the resolution.
|
Classification
of Board of Directors
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws divide the directors into three classes
of directors, each class to have as nearly the same number of
directors as possible. The initial terms of the class 1,
class 2 and class 3 directors expire in one-year,
two-years and three-years, respectively, following the adoption
of the bye-laws on July 24, 2007. Following their initial
terms, all three classes shall be elected to three-year terms.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board is not classified and the
term is for one year.
|
142
Alternate
Directors
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws do not provide for alternate directors.
|
|
According to the IPC bye-laws, each director may appoint an
alternate director by providing written notice to the secretary
of the company. An alternate director shall be entitled to
receive notice of all meetings of the board and to attend and
vote at any such meeting at which the appointing director is not
personally present and generally to perform at such meeting all
the functions of such director.
|
Number of
Directors
Under Bermuda law, the minimum number of directors on a board of
a company is two, although the minimum number of directors may
be set higher and the maximum number of directors may also be
determined in accordance with the bye-laws of the company. The
maximum number of directors may be determined by the Members at
a general meeting or in such other manner as provided in the
bye-laws.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws provide that the board shall consist of
not less than nine and not more than 12 directors. The
exact number of directors is determined by a resolution adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a two- thirds majority of
the board then in office. If no such resolution is in effect,
the board will consist of 11 directors. Any increase in the
size of the board pursuant to this provision may be filled by
the directors appointing additional directors.
|
|
IPCs bye-laws provide that the board shall consist of
not less than two nor more than nine, the exact number to be
determined by the board. However, in the event any class or
series of preferred shares is issued and out-standing, the
board may from time to time increase the maximum number of
directors to any number larger than nine, if the board
determines, in its discretion, that such increase is necessary
to comply with the terms of any such class or series of issued
and outstanding preferred shares. The board shall have the
power to appoint any person as a director or fill in vacancies.
|
Removal
of Directors
Under Bermuda law, subject to a companys bye-laws, the
shareholders of a company may, at a special general meeting
called for that purpose, remove any director or the entire board
of directors provided that the notice of the meeting is served
on the director or directors concerned not less than
14 days before such meeting. Any director given notice of
removal will be entitled to be heard at the special general
meeting. A vacancy created by the removal of a director at a
special general meeting may be filled at that meeting by the
election of another director in his or her place or in the
absence of any such election by the other directors.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, the shareholders may, at any annual
meeting or special general meeting called for that purpose,
remove a director only for Cause by the affirmative vote of at
least sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the votes cast,
provided that the notice of the meeting is served on the
director or directors concerned not less than 14 days
before such meeting and at such meeting such director shall be
entitled to be heard on the motion for such directors
removal.
Cause in the Validus bye-laws means willful
misconduct, fraud, gross negligence, embezzlement or
|
|
The IPC bye-laws do not deviate from the general Bermuda law
position as set out above.
|
143
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
a conviction of, or a plea of guilty or no
contest to, a felony or other crime involving moral
turpitude.
|
|
|
Vacancies
on the Board of Directors
Under Bermuda law, so long as a quorum of directors remains in
office, unless the bye-laws of a company otherwise provide, any
vacancy occurring in the board of directors may be filled by
such directors as remain in office. If no quorum of directors
remains, the vacancy will be filled by a general meeting of
shareholders.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, the office of director shall be
vacated if the director (1) is removed from office pursuant
to the bye-laws or is prohibited from being a director by law,
(2) is or becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or
composition with his creditors generally, (3) is or becomes
of unsound mind or an order for his detention is made, or dies,
or (4) resigns his office. The board of directors has the
power to appoint any person to be a director to fill a vacancy
and a director so appointed shall hold office until such
directors office is otherwise vacated and shall serve
within the same class of directors as the predecessor.
Under
the Validus bye-laws, the board of directors may act
notwithstanding any vacancy in its number but, if and so long as
its number is reduced below the number fixed by the bye-laws as
the quorum necessary for the transaction of business at meetings
of the board of directors, the continuing directors or director
may act for the purpose of (1) summoning a general meeting
or (2) preserving the assets of the company.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board of directors has the power
at any time to appoint any person as a director to fill a
vacancy on the board of directors occurring as the result of the
death, disability, disqualification or resignation of any
director or if such directors office is otherwise vacated.
The office of director shall be vacated if the director
(1) is removed from office pursuant to the bye-laws or is
prohibited from being a director by law, (2) is or becomes
bankrupt, or makes any arrangement or composition with his
creditors generally, (3) is or becomes of unsound mind or
an order for his detention is made, or dies, or (4) resigns
his office. A director so appointed by the board of directors
will hold office until the next annual general meeting or until
such directors office is otherwise vacated.
Under
the IPC bye-laws, the board of directors may act notwithstanding
any vacancy in its number but, if and so long as its number is
reduced below the number fixed by the bye-laws, or such greater
number as may have been determined by the shareholders, as the
quorum necessary for the transaction of business at meetings of
the board of directors, the continuing directors or director may
act only for the purpose of (1) summoning a general meeting or
(2) preserving the assets of the company.
|
Interested
Directors
Bermuda law provides that, if a director or officer has an
interest in a material contract or proposed material contract
with the company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material
interest in any person that is a party to such a contract, the
director or officer must disclose the nature of that interest at
the first opportunity either at a meeting of directors or in
writing to the board of directors.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws provide that, a director who is directly or
indirectly interested in a contract or proposed contract or
arrangement with the company or any of its subsidiaries shall
declare the nature of such interest to the board, whether or not
such declaration is required by law. Unless disqualified by the
chairman of the relevant board meeting, a director may vote in
respect of any
|
|
The IPC bye-laws provide that, a director who is directly or
indirectly interested in a contract or a proposed contract or
arrangement with the company shall declare the nature of such
interest as required by the Companies Act. Unless disqualified
by the chairman of the relevant board meeting, a director
|
144
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
contract or proposed contract or arrangement in which such
director is interested and may be counted in the quorum for such
meeting.
|
|
may vote in respect of any contract or proposed contract or
arrangement in which such director is interested and may be
counted in the quorum for such meeting.
|
Election
of Directors
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
According to the Validus bye-laws, at any election of
directors, nominees shall be elected by a plurality of the votes
cast.
|
|
According to the IPC bye-laws, cumulative voting applies to
any election of directors. Each shareholder entitled to vote in
such election shall have a number of votes equal to the product
of (x) the number of votes conferred by such shareholders
common shares (as adjusted pursuant to the voting power
reduction provisions in the bye- laws, if applicable) and (y)
the number of persons standing for election as directors at the
general meeting. Each shareholder may divide and distribute his
votes, as so calculated, among any one or more candidates for
the directorships to be filled, or such shareholder may cast his
votes for a single candidate. At such election, the candidates
receiving the highest number of votes, up to the number of
directors to be chosen, shall stand elected, and an absolute
majority of the votes cast is not a prerequisite to the election
of any candidate to the board.
|
Voting
Rights and Quorum Requirements
Under Bermuda law, the voting rights of shareholders are
regulated by the companys bye-laws and, in certain
circumstances, by the Companies Act. At any general meeting of
either of Validus or IPC, two or more persons present in person
and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the
total issued and outstanding common shares throughout the
meeting will form a quorum for the transaction of business.
Generally, except as otherwise provided in a Bermuda
companys bye-laws, or the Companies Act, any action or
resolution requiring approval of the shareholders may be passed
by a simple majority of votes cast.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Any individual who is a Validus shareholder and who is present
at a meeting may vote in person as may any corporate shareholder
that is represented by a duly authorized representative at a
meeting of shareholders.
The
Validus bye-laws also permit attendance at general meetings by
proxy.
Subject to the Limitations on Voting Rights
described above, each holder of voting common shares is entitled
to one vote per voting common share held.
|
|
Any individual who is an IPC shareholder and who is present at
a meeting may vote in person, as may any corporate shareholder
that is represented by a duly authorized representative at a
meeting of shareholders.
The
IPC bye-laws also permit attendance at general meetings by
proxy.
Subject to the Limitations on Voting Rights
described above, each holder of common shares is entitled to one
vote per common share held.
|
Discontinuance
or Change of Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Under Bermuda law, a company may change its jurisdiction of
incorporation by discontinuing from Bermuda to a
number of jurisdictions approved by the Bermuda Minister of
Finance. A company may make specific provisions for
discontinuance in its bye-laws, and may delegate authority to
the board of directors to
145
exercise all of the companys powers to discontinue the
company. In the absence of such provision, the decision to
discontinue the company to another jurisdiction must be made by
the shareholders and requires a resolution passed by a simple
majority of the votes cast at a general meeting, provided that
at any such meeting any such share shall carry the right to vote
in respect of such discontinuance whether or not it otherwise
carries the right to vote.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws permit the Validus board, subject to
approval by a majority of shareholders, to exercise all the
powers of the company to discontinue the company.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws do not currently make specific provision for
a different majority vote or a different quorum than that which
has been set out in the Companies Act.
|
Amalgamation
The Companies Act provides that, unless specific provisions have
been made otherwise in a companys bye-laws, the
amalgamation of a company with another company must be approved
by a vote of three-fourths of the shareholders voting at the
meeting, and that the quorum for the meeting shall be two or
more persons holding or representing by proxy more than
one-third of the issued shares of the company of all classes,
whether ordinarily entitled to vote or not.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws do not currently make specific provision
for a different majority vote or a different quorum than that
which has been set out in the Companies Act.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws do not currently make specific provision for
a different majority vote or a different quorum than that which
has been set out in the Companies Act.
|
Duties of
Directors and Director Liability
The Companies Act provides that the business of a company is to
be managed and conducted by the board of directors. Under
Bermuda law, at common law, members of a board of directors owe
fiduciary and other duties to the company to act in good faith
in their dealings with or on behalf of the company and exercise
their powers and fulfill the duties of their office honestly.
This duty has the following essential elements:
|
|
|
|
|
a duty to act in good faith in the best interests of the company;
|
|
|
|
a duty not to make a personal profit from opportunities that
arise from the office of director;
|
|
|
|
a duty to avoid conflicts of interest; and
|
|
|
|
a duty to exercise powers for the purpose for which such powers
were intended.
|
The Companies Act imposes a duty on directors and officers of a
Bermuda company:
|
|
|
|
|
to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best
interests of the company;
|
|
|
|
to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably
prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances; and
|
|
|
|
to disclose material conflicts of interest to the board of the
company at the first opportunity.
|
In addition, the Companies Act imposes various duties on
directors and officers of a company with respect to certain
matters of management and administration of the company.
The Companies Act provides that in any proceedings for
negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust against
any officer, if it appears to a court that such officer is or
may be liable in respect of the negligence, default, breach of
duty or breach of trust, but that he or she has acted honestly
and reasonably, and that, having regard to all the circumstances
of the case, including those connected with his or her
appointment, he or she ought fairly to be excused for the
negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, that
court may relieve him, either wholly or partly, from any
liability on such terms as the court may think fit. This
146
provision has been interpreted to apply only to actions brought
by or on behalf of the company against such officers.
The Companies Act also provides that a company may agree in its
bye-laws or by contract or some other arrangement to exempt or
indemnify its directors from any loss arising or liability
attaching to him or her by virtue of any rule of law in respect
of any negligence, default, breach of duty or trust in relation
to the company or any subsidiary thereof, except for any
liability in respect of any fraud or dishonesty, which would
otherwise attach to such director. Please see the subheading
Indemnification of Officers, Directors and Employees
in this section.
Indemnification
of Officers, Directors and Employees
Bermuda law permits a company to indemnify its directors,
officers and auditors with respect to any loss arising or
liability attaching to such person by virtue of any rule of law
concerning any negligence, default, breach of duty, or breach of
trust of which the directors, officers or auditors may be guilty
in relation to the company or any of its subsidiaries;
provided that the company may not indemnify a director,
officer or auditor against any liability arising out of his or
her fraud or dishonesty. Bermuda law also permits a company to
indemnify its directors, officers and auditors against liability
incurred by them in defending any civil or criminal proceedings
in which judgment is given in their favor or in which they are
acquitted, or when the Court grants relief to them pursuant to
section 281 of the Companies Act. Bermuda law permits a
company to advance moneys to directors, officers and auditors to
defend civil or criminal proceedings against them on condition
that these moneys are repaid if the allegation of fraud or
dishonesty is proved. The Court may relieve directors and
officers from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty
or breach of trust if it appears to the Court that such director
or officer has acted honestly and reasonably and, in all the
circumstances, ought fairly to be excused.
Section 98A of the Companies Act permits companies to
purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any officer
or director in respect of any loss or liability attaching to him
or her in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or
breach of trust in relation to the company or any subsidiary
thereof, whether or not the company may otherwise indemnify such
officer or director.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws indemnify its directors, officers and (in
the discretion of the board) employees and agents and their
heirs, executors and administrators who were or are threatened
to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed
action, suit or proceeding whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (including, without limitation,
an action by or in the right of the company), by reason of his
acting in such capacity or his acting in any other capacity for,
or on behalf of, the company, against any liability or expense
actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect
thereof. In addition, the company shall, in the case of
directors and officers, and may, in other cases, advance the
expenses of defending any such act, suit or proceeding in
accordance with and to the full extent now or hereafter
permitted by law.
Under
the Validus bye-laws, each shareholder agrees to waive any claim
or right of action, other than those involving willful
negligence, willful default, fraud or dishonesty, against the
company or any of its officers or directors on account of any
action taken by such
|
|
The IPC bye-laws indemnify its directors, officers and
secretary and their heirs, executors and administrators in
respect of any actions, costs, charge, losses, damages and
expenses incurred or sustained by or by reason of any act done,
concurred in or omitted (actual or alleged) in or about the
execution of their duty, or supposed duty, or in their
respective offices or trusts; however this indemnity does not
extend to any matter in respect of any willful negligence,
willful default, fraud or dishonesty which may attach to any of
said persons.
Under
the IPC bye-laws, each shareholder agrees to waive any claim or
right of action, other than those involving willful negligence,
willful default, fraud or dishonesty, against any of the
officers or directors of the company on account of any action
taken by such director or officer, or the failure of such
director or officer to take any action in the performance of his
or her duties with or for the company.
IPC
has purchased and maintains directors and officers
liability policies for such purposes.
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
director or officer, or the failure of such director or officer
to take any action in the performance of his or her duties with
or for the company.
Validus has purchased and maintains directors and
officers liability policies for such purposes.
Under the Validus bye-laws, no specific provision is made for
the indemnification of directors and officers of the company in
relation to the affairs of the companys subsidiaries,
although (as noted above) such indemnification is not prohibited
by Bermuda law.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, no specific provision is made for the
indemnification of directors and officers of the company in
relation to the affairs of the companys subsidiaries,
although (as noted above) such indemnification is not prohibited
by Bermuda law.
|
Shareholders
and Derivative Suits
The rights of shareholders under Bermuda law are not as
extensive as the rights of shareholders under legislation or
judicial precedent in many U.S. jurisdictions. Class
actions and derivative actions are generally not available to
shareholders under the laws of Bermuda. However, the Bermuda
courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law
precedent, which would permit a shareholder to commence an
action in the companys name to remedy a wrong done to the
company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond its
corporate power or is illegal or would result in the violation
of its memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore,
consideration would be given by a Bermuda court to acts that are
alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders
or where an act requires the approval of a greater percentage of
shareholders than that which actually approved it or where a
power vested in the board of directors has been exercised for an
improper purpose. The winning party in such an action generally
would be able to recover a portion of attorneys fees
incurred in connection with such action.
When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner
which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of some part
of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to the
Court, which may make such order as it sees fit, including an
order regulating the conduct of the companys affairs in
the future or ordering the purchase of the shares of any
shareholders by other shareholders or by the company.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws provide that shareholders waive any claim
or right of action that they might have, whether individually or
by or in the right of the company, against any of its directors
or officers for any act or failure to act in the performance of
such directors or officers duties, except in respect
of any fraud or dishonesty which may attach to such director or
officer.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws provide that shareholders waive all claims or
rights of action that they might have, both individually or in
the right of the company, against any of its directors or
officers for any act or failure to act in the performance of
such directors or officers duties, except with
respect to any willful negligence, willful default, fraud or
dishonesty of such director or officer.
|
Amendment
of Memorandum of Association
Bermuda law provides that the memorandum of association of a
company may be amended by a resolution passed at a general
meeting of shareholders of which due notice has been given. An
amendment to the memorandum of association that alters a
companys business objects may require approval of the
Bermuda Minister of Finance, who may grant or withhold approval
at his or her discretion.
Under Bermuda law, the holders of an aggregate of not less than
20% in par value of a companys issued share capital or any
class thereof or the holders of not less than 20% of the
debentures entitled to object to amendments to the memorandum of
association have the right to apply to the Bermuda courts for an
annulment of any amendment to the memorandum of association
adopted by shareholders at any general meeting. This does not
apply to an amendment that alters or reduces a companys
share capital as provided in
148
the Companies Act. Upon such application, the alteration will
not have effect until it is confirmed by the Bermuda court. An
application for an annulment of an amendment to the memorandum
of association must be made within 21 days after the date
on which the resolution altering the companys memorandum
of association is passed and may be made on behalf of persons
entitled to make the application by one or more of their number
as they may appoint in writing for the purpose. No application
may be made by shareholders voting in favor of the amendment.
Amendment
of Bye-laws
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Consistent with Bermuda law, the Validus bye-laws may only be
amended by a resolution adopted by the board of directors and by
resolution of the shareholders.
|
|
Consistent with Bermuda law, the IPC bye-laws may only be
amended by a resolution adopted by the board of directors and by
resolution of the shareholders.
|
Preemptive
Rights
Under Bermuda law, no shareholder has a preemptive right to
subscribe for additional issues of a companys shares
unless, and to the extent that, the right is expressly granted
to the shareholder under the bye-laws of a company or under any
contract between the shareholder and the company.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws are silent with respect to preemptive
rights for shareholders.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws are silent with respect to preemptive rights
for shareholders.
|
Business
Combination Statutes
A Bermuda company may not enter into certain business
transactions with its significant shareholders or affiliates
without obtaining prior approval from its board of directors
and, in certain instances, its shareholders. Examples of such
business transactions include amalgamation, mergers, asset sales
and other transactions in which a significant shareholder or
affiliate receives or could receive a financial benefit that is
greater than that received or to be received by other
shareholders.
Approval
of Certain Transactions
The Companies Act is silent on whether a companys
shareholders are required to approve a sale, lease or exchange
of all or substantially all of a companys property and
assets. Bermuda law does require, however, that shareholders
approve certain forms of mergers and reconstructions.
Takeovers: Bermuda law provides that where an
offer is made for shares of a company and within four months of
the offer the holders of not less than 90% of the shares which
are the subject of the offer accept the offer, the offeror may,
by notice, require the non-tendering shareholders to transfer
their shares on the terms of the offer. Dissenting shareholders
may apply to the Court within one month of the notice objecting
to the transfer. The burden is on the dissenting shareholders to
show that the Court should exercise its discretion to enjoin the
required transfer, which the Court will be unlikely to do unless
there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion between the
offeror and the holders of the shares who have accepted the
offer as a means of unfairly forcing out minority shareholders.
Amalgamations: Pursuant to Bermuda law, the
amalgamation of a Bermuda company with another company or
corporation (other than certain affiliated companies) requires
the amalgamation agreement to be approved by the companys
board of directors and by its shareholders. Unless the
companys bye-laws provide otherwise, the approval of 75%
of the shareholders voting at such meeting is required to
approve the amalgamation agreement, and the quorum for such
meeting must be two or more persons holding or representing more
than one-third of the issued shares of the company. The required
vote of shareholders may be reduced by a companys
bye-laws. For purposes of approval of an amalgamation, all
shares, whether or not otherwise entitled to vote, carry the
right to vote. A separate vote of a class of shares is required
if the rights of such class would be altered by virtue of the
amalgamation. Any shareholder who does not vote in favor of
149
the amalgamation and who is not satisfied that he or she has
been offered fair value for his or her shares may, within one
month of receiving the companys notice of shareholder
meeting to consider the amalgamation, apply to the Court to
appraise the fair value of his or her shares. No appeal will lie
from an appraisal by the Court. The costs of any application to
the Court shall be in the discretion of the Court.
Inspection
of Books and Records; Shareholder Lists
Under Bermuda law, members of the general public have the right
to inspect a companys public documents available at the
office of the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda, which will
include a companys memorandum of association (including
its objects and powers) and any alterations to its memorandum of
association, including any increase or reduction of the
companys authorized capital.
Registered shareholders have the additional right to inspect the
bye-laws, minutes of general meetings and audited financial
statements of a company, which must be presented to the annual
general meeting of shareholders. A companys register of
members is also open to inspection by shareholders, and to
members of the public, without charge. The register of members
is required to be open for inspection for not less than two
hours in any business day (subject to the ability of a company
to close the register of members for not more than 30 days
in a year). A company is required to maintain a share register
in Bermuda but may, subject to the provisions of the Companies
Act, establish a branch register outside Bermuda. A company is
required to keep at its registered office a register of its
directors and officers which is open for inspection for not less
than two hours in any business day by members of the public
without charge. Bermuda law does not, however, provide a general
right for shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other
corporate records.
Appraisal
Rights/Dissenters Rights
Under Bermuda law, a dissenting shareholder of an amalgamating
company that does not believe it has been offered fair value for
its shares may apply to the Court to appraise the fair value of
its shares. Where the Court has appraised any such shares and
the amalgamation has been consummated prior to the appraisal
then, within one month of the Court appraising the value of the
shares, if the amount (if any) paid to the dissenting
shareholder for his or her shares is less than that appraised by
the Court, the amalgamated company shall pay to such shareholder
the difference between the amount paid to such shareholder and
the value appraised by the Court. Bermuda law provides for
dissenters rights in an amalgamation between
non-affiliated companies and affiliated companies where one
company is not a Bermuda company.
Required
Purchase and Sale of Shares
An acquiring party is generally able to acquire compulsorily the
common shares of minority holders in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
By a procedure under the Companies Act known as a scheme
of arrangement. A scheme of arrangement could be effected
by obtaining the agreement of the company and of holders of
common shares, representing in the aggregate a majority in
number and at least 75% in value of the common shareholders
(excluding shares owned by the acquirer) present and voting at a
court-ordered meeting held to consider the scheme or
arrangement. The scheme of arrangement must then be sanctioned
by the Court. If a scheme of arrangement receives all necessary
agreements and sanctions, upon the filing of the Court order
with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda, all holders of
common shares could be compelled to sell their shares under the
terms of the scheme of arrangement. A dissenting shareholder has
no right to an appraisal by the Court or an independent valuer.
The Court does not examine or pass judgment upon the fairness of
the purchase price and dissenters do not have an entitlement to
receive the value of their shares exclusively in cash;
|
|
|
|
If the acquiring party is a company it may compulsorily acquire
all the shares of the target company by acquiring, pursuant to a
tender offer, 90% in value of the shares or class of shares not
already owned by, or by a nominee for, the acquiring party (the
offeror), or any of its subsidiaries. If an offeror has, within
four months after the making of an offer for all the shares or
class of shares not owned by, or by a nominee for, the offeror,
or any of its subsidiaries, obtained the approval of the holders
of at least
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
90% in value of all the shares to which the offer relates, the
offeror may, at any time within two months beginning with the
date on which the approval was obtained, require by notice any
nontendering shareholder to transfer its shares on the same
terms, including the form of consideration, as the original
offer. In those circumstances, nontendering shareholders could
be compelled to transfer their shares unless the Court (on
application made within a one-month period from the date of the
offerors notice of its intention to acquire such shares)
orders otherwise. Nontendering shareholders do not have
appraisal rights, and in the event that a dissenting
shareholders application to the Court is unsuccessful,
such shareholder does not have an entitlement to receive the
value of its shares exclusively in cash; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where one or more parties holds not less than 95% of the shares
or a class of shares of a company, such holder(s) may, pursuant
to a notice given to the remaining shareholders or class of
shareholders, acquire the shares of such remaining shareholders
or class of shareholders. This provision only applies where the
acquiring party offers the same terms to all holders of shares
whose shares are being acquired. When this notice is given, the
acquiring party is entitled and bound to acquire the shares of
the remaining shareholders on the terms set out in the notice,
unless a remaining shareholder, within one month of receiving
such notice, applies to the Court for an appraisal of the value
of their shares. On an appraisal, the Court may inquire into the
value of any shares or other securities being offered by the
purchaser and, in fixing the price to be paid to the remaining
shareholders, the Court may order that the price may be paid in
a combination of the shares or other securities and cash offered
by the purchase. The remaining shareholders do not have an
entitlement to receive the value of the shares exclusively in
cash.
|
151
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus may include
forward-looking statements, both with respect to
Validus and IPC and their industry, that reflect Validus
and IPCs current views with respect to future events and
financial performance. Statements that include the words
expect, intend, plan,
confident, believe, project,
anticipate, will, may and
similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature
identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties,
many of which are beyond Validus and IPCs control.
Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated
in such statements and, therefore, you should not place undue
reliance on any such statements. Validus and IPC believe these
factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
1) Validus and IPC may be unable to complete the proposed
Amalgamation because, among other reasons, conditions to the
closing of the proposed Amalgamation may not be satisfied or
waived; 2) uncertainty as to the actual premium that will
be realized by IPC shareholders in connection with the
Amalgamation; 3) uncertainty as to the long-term value of
Validus Shares; 4) unpredictability and severity of
catastrophic events; 5) rating agency actions;
6) adequacy of Validus or IPCs risk management
and loss limitation methods; 7) cyclicality of demand and
pricing in the insurance and reinsurance markets;
8) Validus limited operating history;
9) Validus ability to implement its business strategy
during soft as well as hard markets;
10) adequacy of Validus or IPCs loss reserves;
11) continued availability of capital and financing;
12) retention of key personnel; 13) competition;
14) potential loss of business from one or more major
insurance or reinsurance brokers; 15) Validus or
IPCs ability to implement, successfully and on a timely
basis, complex infrastructure, distribution capabilities,
systems, procedures and internal controls, and to develop
accurate actuarial data to support the business and regulatory
and reporting requirements; 16) general economic and market
conditions (including inflation, volatility in the credit and
capital markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates); 17) the integration of Talbot or other businesses
Validus may acquire or new business ventures Validus may start;
18) the effect on Validus or IPCs investment
portfolios of changing financial market conditions including
inflation, interest rates, liquidity and other factors;
19) acts of terrorism or outbreak of war;
20) availability of reinsurance and retrocessional
coverage; 21) failure to realize the anticipated benefits
of the Amalgamation, including as a result of failure or delay
in integrating the businesses of Validus and IPC; and
22) the outcome of any legal proceedings to the extent
initiated against Validus, IPC and others following the
announcement of the proposed Amalgamation, as well as
managements response to any of the aforementioned factors.
These and other relevant factors, including those risk factors
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and any other
information included or incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, and information that may be
contained in Validus and IPCs other filings with the
SEC, should be carefully considered when reviewing any
forward-looking statement.
The foregoing review of important factors should not be
construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with
the other cautionary statements that are included herein and
elsewhere, including the Risk Factors included in Validus
most recent reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and the risk factors included in IPCs most recent reports
on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and other documents of Validus and IPC on file with the SEC. Any
forward-looking statements made in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are qualified by these cautionary
statements, and there can be no assurance that the actual
results or developments anticipated by Validus will be realized
or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the
expected consequences to, or effects on, Validus, IPC or their
respective business or operations. Except as required by law,
Validus and IPC undertake no obligation to update publicly or
revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
VALIDITY
OF SECURITIES
Appleby has provided an opinion regarding the validity of the
Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the Amalgamation, with
respect to matters of Bermuda law.
152
ENFORCEABILITY
OF CIVIL LIABILITIES UNDER THE
UNITED STATES FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
Validus and IPC are Bermuda exempted companies, and certain of
their respective officers and directors are residents of various
jurisdictions outside of the United States. All or a substantial
portion of their assets and those of their respective officers
and directors are or may be located in jurisdictions outside the
U.S. Therefore, it ordinarily could be difficult for
investors to effect service of process within the U.S. on
Validus, IPC or their respective officers and directors who
reside outside of the U.S. or to enforce against them
judgments of courts in the U.S., including judgments predicated
upon civil liability under the U.S. federal securities
laws. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Validus and IPC have
irrevocably agreed that they may be served with process with
respect to actions based on offers and sales of the common
shares made by this joint proxy statement/prospectus in the
U.S. by serving CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue,
New York, New York 10011, Validus and IPCs
U.S. agent appointed for that purpose.
EXPERTS
The financial statements and managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
(which is included in Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting) incorporated in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and the registration statement by
reference to Validus Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
IPCs consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
have been incorporated by reference herein and in the
registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG,
independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated by
reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
153
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Except as set forth below, Validus will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust
company or other nominee for the solicitation of proxies in
connection with this solicitation.
Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, facsimile,
telegraph, the internet,
e-mail,
newspapers and other publications of general distribution and in
person. Directors and officers of Validus listed on
Schedule I hereto may assist in the solicitation of proxies
without any additional remuneration (except as otherwise set
forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus).
Validus and IPC will each bear their respective costs of
soliciting proxies. Solicitation will be made by mail, and may
be made by directors, officers and employees, personally or by
telephone or
e-mail.
Proxy cards and materials also will be distributed to beneficial
owners of Validus Shares and IPC Shares through brokers,
custodians, nominees and other parties, and Validus and IPC, as
the case may be, expect to reimburse such parties for their
charges and expenses.
Validus has retained Georgeson for solicitation and advisory
services in connection with solicitations relating to the
Validus special meeting, for which Georgeson may receive a fee
of up to $75,000 in connection with the solicitation of proxies
for the Validus special meeting. Up to 50 people may be
employed by Georgeson in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the Validus special meeting. Validus has also agreed
to reimburse Georgeson for out-of-pocket expenses and to
indemnify Georgeson against certain liabilities and expenses,
including reasonable legal fees and related charges. Georgeson
will solicit proxies for the Validus special meeting from
individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other
institutional holders. The entire expense of soliciting proxies
for the Validus special meeting by or on behalf of Validus is
being borne by Validus.
IPC has retained Innisfree to assist in the solicitation of IPC
proxies at a fee not expected to exceed $25,000, plus
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, including phone calls
and services relating to reimbursement of banks and brokers.
If you have any questions concerning this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or the procedures to be followed to execute
and deliver a proxy, please contact Georgeson or Innisfree at
the address or phone number specified on the back cover of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
154
OTHER
MATTERS
Validus and IPC know of no specific matters to be brought before
the Validus special meeting or the IPC special meeting that is
not referred to in the relevant notice of special meeting. If
any such matter comes before either special meeting, including
any shareholder proposal properly made, the proxy holders will
vote proxies in accordance with their judgment.
155
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR VALIDUS 2010 ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING
Shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the proxy
statement for the Validus 2010 annual general meeting should be
submitted in accordance with the procedures prescribed by Rule
14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act and sent to the General
Counsel at Validus Holdings, Ltd., Suite 1790, 48 Par-la-Ville
Road, Hamilton, HM 11 Bermuda. Such proposals must be received
by November 26, 2009.
In addition, a Validus shareholder may present a proposal at the
Validus 2010 annual general meeting other than pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Any such proposal will not
be included in the proxy statement for the Validus 2010 annual
general meeting and must be received by the General Counsel at
Validus Holdings, Ltd., Suite 1790, 48 Par-la-Ville
Road, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda by February 10, 2010. If any
such proposal is not so received, such proposal will be deemed
untimely and, therefore, the persons appointed by Validus
board of directors as its proxies will have the right to
exercise discretionary voting authority with respect to such
proposal.
156
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR IPCS 2010 ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING
IPC will hold a 2010 annual general meeting of shareholders only
if the Amalgamation does not close. Shareholder proposals for
the 2010 annual general meeting of shareholders, if it is to
occur, must be received in writing by the Secretary of IPC and
must comply with the requirements of Bermuda corporate law and
IPCs bye-laws in order to be considered for inclusion in
IPCs proxy statement and form of proxy relating to such
meeting. Such proposals should be directed to the attention of
the Secretary, IPC Holdings, Ltd., American International
Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda. If it is
determined that the Amalgamation will not be completed as
contemplated by the Amalgamation Agreement, IPC will provide
notice of the date fixed for the 2010 annual general meeting of
shareholders, as well as the deadline for submitting shareholder
proposals for such meeting and for having such shareholders
proposals included in IPCs proxy statement.
If a shareholder proposal is introduced at the 2010 annual
general meeting of shareholders (if one is to occur) without any
discussion of the proposal in the 2010 proxy statement and the
shareholder does not notify IPC, in accordance with Bermuda
corporate law, of the intent to raise such proposal at the
annual general meeting of shareholders, then proxies received by
IPC for the 2010 annual general meeting of shareholders will be
voted by the persons named as such proxies in their discretion
with respect to such proposal.
157
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Validus and IPC file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy any of this information filed with the SEC at the
SECs public reference room:
Public Reference Room
100 F Street NE
Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
For information regarding the operation of the Public Reference
Room, you may call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
These filings made with the SEC are also available to the public
through the website maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov
or from commercial document retrieval services.
Validus has filed a registration statement on
Form S-4
to register with the SEC the offering and sale of Validus Shares
to be issued pursuant to the Amalgamation. This joint proxy
statement/prospectus is a part of that registration statement.
We may also file additional amendments to the registration
statement. You may obtain copies of the
Form S-4
(and any amendments to the Form S-4) by contacting the
relevant solicitation agents.
Some of the documents previously filed with the SEC may have
been sent to you, but you can also obtain any of them through
Validus, IPC, the SEC or the SECs website as described
above. Documents filed with the SEC are available from Validus
or IPC, as applicable, without charge, excluding all exhibits,
except that, if Validus or IPC, as applicable, has specifically
incorporated by reference an exhibit in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the exhibit will also be provided without
charge.
You may obtain documents filed with the SEC by requesting them
in writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at the
following addresses:
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
(441) 278-9000
Attention: Jon Levenson
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
American International Building
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke HM 08
Bermuda
(441) 298-5100
Attention: Melanie J. Saunders
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least ten business days
before the relevant shareholder meeting. This means you must
request this information no later than
[ l ],
2009. Validus will mail properly requested documents to
requesting shareholders by first class mail, or another equally
prompt means, within one business day after receipt of such
request.
You can also get more information by visiting Validus
website at
http://www.validusre.bm,
or IPCs website at
http://www.ipcre.bm.
Materials from these websites and other websites mentioned in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus are not incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. If you are
viewing this joint proxy statement/prospectus in electronic
format, each of the URLs mentioned in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is an active textual reference only.
158
The SEC allows Validus and IPC to incorporate information into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference,
which means that Validus and IPC can disclose important
information to you by referring you to another document filed
separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by
reference is deemed to be part of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, except for any information superseded by
information contained directly in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus
incorporates by reference the documents set forth below that
Validus and IPC have previously filed with the SEC. These
documents contain important information about Validus and IPC
and their financial condition, business and results.
|
|
|
Validus Filings (Commission File No. 001-33606):
|
|
Period
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on February 9, 2009, March 31, 2009, April 3, 2009,
April 9, 2009, April 16, 2009, April 29, 2009, April 30, 2009,
May 5, 2009, May 6, 2009, May 11, 2009,
May 12, 2009, May 14, 2009, May 18, 2009,
May 20, 2009, May 22, 2009, June 1, 2009,
June 8, 2009, July 9, 2009, July 23, 2009, July
30, 2009 and August 5, 2009 (other than any portion of any
documents not deemed to be filed, although the
Form 8-K
filed on May 11, 2009 (Film No. 09816281), was
furnished and not filed with the SEC, it is specifically
incorporated by reference herein, notwithstanding any other
provisions to the contrary)
|
The description of Validus common shares contained in its
registration statement on
Form S-3,
including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating the description.
|
|
Filed on August 7, 2008
|
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
|
|
Filed on March 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
IPC Filings (Commission File No. 000-27662):
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(except for the report of IPCs independent public
accountants contained therein which is not incorporated herein
by reference because the consent of IPCs independent
public accountants has not yet been obtained nor has exemptive
relief under Rule 437, promulgated under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, been granted to Validus by the SEC)
|
|
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (as amended on Form
10-K/A filed on April 30, 2009)
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on March 2, 2009, March 10, 2009, March 11, 2009, March
31, 2009, April 7, 2009, May 1, 2009, June 5, 2009,
June 12, 2009, July 1, 2009, July 9, 2009,
July 14, 2009 and July 20, 2009 (other than any
portions of any documents not deemed to be filed)
|
|
|
|
The description of IPC common shares contained in its
registration statement on
Form S-3,
including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating the description.
|
|
Filed on April 27, 2006
|
Each of Validus and IPC also hereby incorporates by reference
any additional documents that either company may file with the
SEC pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act from the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to the consummation of the Amalgamation.
Nothing in this prospectus shall be deemed to incorporate
information furnished but not filed with the SEC.
Validus has supplied all of the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relating to Validus, as well as all
unaudited pro forma financial information, and IPC has supplied
all information contained or incorporated by reference in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus
159
relating to IPC. This document constitutes the prospectus of
Validus and a joint proxy statement of Validus and IPC.
Shareholders may obtain any of these documents without charge
upon written or oral request, if regarding Validus, to Georgeson
Inc., 199 Water Street, 26th Floor, New York, New York
10038, banks and brokerage firms please call
(212) 440-9800,
all others call toll-free at
(888) 274-5146,
and, if regarding IPC, to Innisfree M&A Incorporated, 501
Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10022, toll free for
shareholders:
(877) 825-8621,
banks and brokers call collect:
(212) 750-5834,
or from the SEC at the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov.
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS JOINT PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE YOUR SHARES.
VALIDUS AND IPC HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH
INFORMATION THAT DIFFERS FROM THAT CONTAINED IN THIS JOINT PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS
DATED
[ l ],
2009. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN
THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE
OTHER THAN THAT DATE, AND NEITHER THE MAILING OF THIS JOINT
PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS TO SHAREHOLDERS NOR THE ISSUANCE OF
VALIDUS COMMON SHARES SHALL CREATE ANY IMPLICATION TO THE
CONTRARY.
160
Annex A
EXECUTION
COPY
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION
Dated as of July 9, 2009
Among
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.,
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
And
VALIDUS LTD.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE I
THE AMALGAMATION
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
The Amalgamation; Effective Time
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
Effects of the Amalgamation
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
Amalgamated Company Bye-laws
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
[Reserved]
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
Directors and Officers of the Amalgamated Company
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Amalgamated Company Name
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION OF IPC SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
Effect on Share Capital
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Exchange Procedures
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
IPC Equity Awards
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Organization, Standing and Power
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Capital Structure
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Authority; Non-Contravention
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
SEC Documents; Regulatory Reports; Undisclosed Liabilities
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
Compliance with Applicable Laws and Reporting Requirements
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
Legal and Arbitration Proceedings and Investigations
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
Board Approval
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
Vote Required
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
Agreements with Regulators
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
Insurance Matters
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
Investments; Derivatives
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
Material Contracts; Intercompany Contracts
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
Labor Relations and Other Employment Matters
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
Brokers or Finders
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
Investment Advisor
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
Termination of Max Agreement
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
ARTICLE IV
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Covenants of Validus and IPC
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
Bermuda Required Actions
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
Preparation of Joint Proxy/Prospectus; Shareholders Meetings
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
Access to Information; Confidentiality
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
Commercially Reasonable Efforts
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
No Change in Recommendation
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
Section 16 Matters
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
Indemnification; Directors and Officers Insurance
|
|
|
A-33
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
|
Additional Agreements
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
Shareholder Litigation
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
Listing and Delisting; Reservation for Issuance
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
Max Termination Fee
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
Validus Proposals
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
Certain Max Litigation
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
Requisition Meeting
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the
Amalgamation
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of IPC
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligation of Validus
|
|
|
A-38
|
|
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
Repayment of the Reimbursement Amount
|
|
|
A-41
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
Enforcement
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
8.10
|
|
|
Submission to Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
8.11
|
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
8.12
|
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
Defined Terms
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
Exhibit A Amalgamation Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit B IPC Bye-Law Amendment
|
|
|
|
|
A-ii
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION, dated as of July 9,
2009 (this Agreement), among IPC
HOLDINGS, LTD., a Bermuda exempted company
(IPC), VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD., a Bermuda
exempted company (Validus) and VALIDUS LTD.,
a Bermuda exempted company and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Validus (Amalgamation Sub).
WHEREAS, the board of directors of IPC has adopted this
Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement (as defined in
Section 1.1) and authorized and approved the amalgamation
of IPC with Amalgamation Sub upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein (the
Amalgamation), authorized and approved the
IPC Bye-Law Amendment (as defined in Section 3.9(a)) and
deems it fair to, advisable to and in the best interests of IPC
to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of Validus has adopted this
Agreement, authorized and approved the issuance of Validus
Common Shares (as defined in Section 2.1(a)) in the
Amalgamation (the Share Issuance) and deems
it fair, advisable and in the best interests of Validus to enter
into this Agreement and to consummate the Share Issuance and the
other transactions contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of Amalgamation Sub has adopted
this Agreement, authorized and approved the Amalgamation, and
deems it advisable and in the best interests of Amalgamation Sub
to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, in accordance with IPCs and Validus desire
to consummate the Amalgamation, Validus is withdrawing its
previously announced exchange offer for the common shares of IPC;
WHEREAS, this Agreement is being entered into in accordance with
the Bermuda Companies Act of 1981, as amended (the
Companies Act);
WHEREAS, IPC, Validus, and Amalgamation Sub desire to make
certain representations, warranties and agreements in connection
with the Amalgamation and also to prescribe various conditions
to the Amalgamation;
WHEREAS, it is intended that this Agreement shall constitute a
plan of reorganization, within the meaning of
Section 354 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code);
WHEREAS, following the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
IPC is paying $50,000,000 to Max Capital Group Ltd.
(Max) in respect of the Max Termination Fee
(as defined in Section 4.1(a)) and Validus is paying
$50,000,000 to IPC in respect of, and in reliance upon, such
payment by IPC to Max; and
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, as
an inducement to IPCs willingness to enter into this
Agreement, IPC has entered into a Voting Agreement with each of
the Specified Validus Shareholders (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE
AMALGAMATION
1.1 The Amalgamation; Effective
Time. Subject to the provisions of this
Agreement, and the amalgamation agreement attached as
Exhibit A (the Amalgamation
Agreement), Validus, Amalgamation Sub and IPC will
cause (a) the Amalgamation Agreement to be executed and
delivered and (b) an application for registration of an
amalgamated company (the Amalgamation
Application) to be prepared, executed and delivered to
the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda (the
Registrar) as provided under Section 108
of the Companies Act on or prior to the Closing Date and will
cause the Amalgamation to become effective pursuant to the
Companies Act. The Amalgamation shall become effective upon the
issuance of a certificate of amalgamation (the
Certificate of Amalgamation) by the Registrar
or such other time as the Certificate of Amalgamation may
provide. The parties agree that they will request the Registrar
provide in the Certificate of
A-1
Amalgamation that the Effective Time will be the time when the
Amalgamation Application is filed with the Registrar or another
time mutually agreed by the parties (the Effective
Time).
1.2 Closing. The closing of the
Amalgamation (the Closing) will take place at
10:00 a.m. on the date (the Closing
Date) that is the third business day after the
satisfaction or waiver (if such waiver is permitted and
effective under applicable Law (as defined in
Section 3.5(a)) of the latest to be satisfied or waived of
the conditions set forth in ARTICLE VI (excluding
conditions that, by their terms, are to be satisfied on the
Closing Date), unless another time or date is agreed to in
writing by the parties. The Closing shall be held at the offices
of Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp, 80 Pine
Street, in New York, NY, unless another place is agreed to in
writing by the parties.
1.3 Effects of the
Amalgamation. As of the Effective Time,
subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
Amalgamation Agreement, IPC shall be amalgamated with
Amalgamation Sub and the amalgamated company (the
Amalgamated Company) shall continue
after the Amalgamation. The parties acknowledge and agree that
for purposes of Bermuda Law (a) the Amalgamation shall be
effected so as to constitute an amalgamation and
(b) the Amalgamated Company shall be deemed to be an
amalgamated company in accordance with
Section 104 of the Companies Act. Under Section 109 of
the Companies Act, from and after the Effective Time: (i)
the Amalgamation of IPC and Amalgamation Sub and their
continuance as one company shall become effective; (ii)
the property of each of IPC and Amalgamation Sub shall become
the property of Amalgamated Company; (iii) Amalgamated
Company shall continue to be liable for the obligations and
liabilities of each of IPC and Amalgamation Sub; (iv) any
existing cause of action, claim or liability to prosecution
shall be unaffected; (v) a civil, criminal or
administrative action or proceeding pending by or against IPC or
Amalgamation Sub may be continued to be prosecuted by or against
Amalgamated Company; and (vi) a conviction against, or
ruling, order or judgment in favor of or against, IPC or
Amalgamation Sub may be enforced by or against Amalgamated
Company.
1.4 Amalgamated Company
Bye-laws. The bye-laws of the Amalgamated
Company shall be the bye-laws of the Amalgamation Sub.
1.5 [Reserved].
1.6 Directors and Officers of the Amalgamated
Company.
(a) The parties hereto shall take all actions necessary so
that the board of directors of Amalgamation Sub at the Effective
Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the directors
of the Amalgamated Company until the earlier of their
resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected or appointed.
(b) The parties hereto shall take all actions necessary so
that the officers of Amalgamation Sub at the Effective Time
shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the officers of the
Amalgamated Company until the earlier of their resignation or
removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or
appointed.
1.7 Amalgamated Company Name. IPC
and Validus shall take all actions reasonably necessary so that
immediately after the Effective Time the name of the Amalgamated
Company shall be Validus Ltd.
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION
OF IPC SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
2.1 Effect on Share
Capital. Subject to the terms and conditions
of this Agreement, at the Effective Time, by virtue of the
Amalgamation and without any action on the part of the holder of
any common shares in IPC, each having a par value of $0.01
(each, an IPC Common Share), as evidenced by
way of entry in the register of shareholders of IPC (the
IPC Share Register) or by share certificates
registered in the name of a shareholder and representing
outstanding IPC Common Shares (each, an IPC
Certificate):
(a) Conversion of IPC Common
Shares. Each IPC Common Share issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than
Dissenting Shares (as defined in Section 2.1(c)) shall be
cancelled and converted into the right to receive for each IPC
Common Share (i) 0.9727 (the Exchange
A-2
Ratio) Validus voting common shares, each having a
par value of $0.175 (each, a Validus Common
Share) (the Per Share Common
Consideration), and (ii) $7.50 in cash without
interest (the Per Share Cash Consideration)
(the Per Share Common Consideration and the Per Share Cash
Consideration, together with any cash paid in lieu of fractional
shares in accordance with Section 2.2(e), the
Consideration). Upon such conversion, each
IPC Common Share shall be cancelled and each holder of IPC
Common Shares registered in the IPC Share Register or holding a
valid IPC Certificate immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall thereafter cease to have any rights with respect to such
IPC Common Shares except the right to receive the Consideration.
The Consideration shall be appropriately adjusted to reflect
fully the effect of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock
dividend (including any dividend or distribution of securities
convertible into Validus Common Shares or IPC Common Shares),
reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification or other like
change with respect to Validus Common Shares or IPC Common
Shares having a record date on or after the date hereof and
prior to the Effective Time.
(b) Cancellation of Validus-Owned
Securities. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, all IPC Common Shares that are owned
by Validus or by any subsidiary of Validus immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Amalgamation, and
without any action on the part of the holder thereof,
automatically be cancelled and retired without any conversion
thereof and shall cease to exist, and no payment shall be made
in respect thereof.
(c) Shares of Dissenting
Holders. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, any issued and outstanding IPC Common
Shares held by a person who did not vote in favor of the
Amalgamation and who complies with all the provisions of the
Companies Act concerning the right of holders of IPC Common
Shares to require appraisal of their IPC Common Shares pursuant
to Bermuda Law (any such holder, a Dissenting
Holder, and such IPC Common Shares,
Dissenting Shares) shall not be converted
into the right to receive the Consideration as described in
Section 2.1(a), but shall be cancelled and converted into
the right to receive the fair value thereof as appraised by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda under Section 106 of the Companies
Act. In the event that a Dissenting Holder fails to perfect,
effectively withdraws or otherwise waives any right to
appraisal, its IPC Common Shares shall be cancelled and
converted as of the Effective Time into the right to receive the
Consideration for each such Dissenting Share. IPC shall give
Validus (i) prompt notice of (A) any written
demands for appraisal of Dissenting Shares or withdrawals of
such demands received by IPC and (B) to the extent that
IPC has actual knowledge, any applications to the Supreme Court
of Bermuda for appraisal of the fair value of the Dissenting
Shares, and (ii) the opportunity to participate with IPC
in all negotiations and proceedings with respect to any demands
for appraisal under the Companies Act. Neither IPC nor Validus
shall, without the prior written consent of the other party (not
to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), voluntarily make any
payment with respect to, or settle, offer to settle or otherwise
negotiate, any such demands.
2.2 Exchange Procedures.
(a) Exchange Agent. Prior to the
Effective Time, Validus shall designate an exchange and paying
agent reasonably acceptable to IPC (the Exchange
Agent) for the purpose of exchanging IPC Common Shares
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. Prior to or
at the Effective Time, Validus shall deposit, or shall cause to
be deposited with the Exchange Agent in accordance with this
ARTICLE II, (i) certificates, or at Validus
option, shares in book entry form representing the Validus
Common Shares to be exchanged in the Amalgamation, (ii) a
cash amount in immediately available funds necessary for the
Exchange Agent to make payments of the aggregate Per Share Cash
Consideration under Section 2.1(a)(ii) (the Cash
Portion), (iii) cash in an amount sufficient to
pay any cash payable in lieu of fractional shares pursuant to
Section 2.2(e) and (iv) any dividends or distributions
to which the shareholders of IPC may be entitled pursuant to
Section 2.2(c). Such Consideration and cash so deposited
are hereinafter referred to as the Exchange
Fund. No interest shall be paid or accrued for the
benefit of holders of the IPC Certificates or IPC Common Shares
in the IPC Share Register on cash amounts payable pursuant to
this Section 2.2. The Exchange Agent shall invest the Cash
Portion as directed by Validus, provided that such investments
shall be in obligations of or guaranteed by the United States of
America, in commercial paper obligations rated A1 or P1 or
better by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or
Standard & Poors, respectively, in certificates
of deposit, bank repurchase agreements or
A-3
bankers acceptances of commercial banks with capital
exceeding $1 billion, or in money market funds having a
rating in the highest investment category granted by a
recognized credit rating agency at the time of investment. Any
interest and other income resulting from such investments shall
be paid over promptly to Validus and any amounts in excess of
the amounts payable under Section 2.1(a)(ii) shall be
promptly returned to Validus. To the extent that there are any
losses with respect to any such investments, or the Cash Portion
diminishes for any reason below the level required for the
Exchange Agent to make prompt cash payment of the aggregate Per
Share Cash Consideration under Section 2.1(a)(ii), Validus
shall promptly replace or restore the cash in the Cash Portion
so as to ensure that the Cash Portion is at all times maintained
at a level sufficient for the Exchange Agent to pay the
aggregate Per Share Cash Consideration under
Section 2.1(a)(ii).
(b) Exchange Procedures. As
promptly as practicable following the Effective Time, Validus or
the Amalgamated Company shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail,
to each shareholder of IPC, (i) a letter of transmittal
(which shall be in such form and have such other provisions as
the parties may reasonably specify) and (ii) where
applicable, instructions for use in effecting the surrender of
IPC Certificates or IPC Common Shares in the IPC Share Register,
to the extent available and in issue, in exchange for the
Consideration. After the Effective Time, upon surrender of title
to the IPC Common Shares previously held by a shareholder of IPC
in accordance with this Section 2.2, together with such
letter of transmittal duly executed if such shareholder holds
IPC Certificates or IPC Common Shares in the IPC Share Register,
and such other documents as the Exchange Agent may reasonably
require, a holder of IPC Common Shares shall be entitled to
receive in exchange therefor (i) a certificate or
book-entry representing that number of whole Validus Common
Shares (rounded down) which such shareholder has the right to
receive in respect of the IPC Common Shares formerly represented
by such IPC Certificates or in the IPC Share Register after
taking into account all IPC Common Shares then held by such
shareholder, (ii) a cash amount in immediately available
funds (after giving effect to any required Tax withholdings as
provided in Section 2.2(i)) equal to (1) the number of
IPC Common Shares represented by such IPC Certificate (or
affidavit of loss in lieu thereof as provided in
Section 2.2(f)) or IPC Common Shares in the IPC Share
Register multiplied by (2) the Per Share Cash Consideration
and (iii) any cash in lieu of fractional shares that such
shareholder has the right to receive pursuant to
Section 2.2(e), and any IPC Certificate surrendered in
respect thereof shall forthwith be marked as cancelled. In the
event of a transfer of ownership of IPC Common Shares that is
not registered in the transfer records of IPC, a certificate or
book-entry representing the proper number of Validus Common
Shares may be issued to a transferee if the IPC Certificate
representing such IPC Common Shares (if any) is presented to the
Exchange Agent, accompanied by all documents required to
evidence and effect such transfer and by evidence that any
applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. No dividends or other distributions
declared or made with respect to Validus Common Shares with a
record date on or after the Effective Time shall be paid to any
shareholder of IPC holding any unsurrendered IPC Certificate or
IPC Common Shares in the IPC Share Register with respect to the
Validus Common Shares represented thereby, nor shall the cash
payment in lieu of fractional shares be paid to any such
shareholder pursuant to Section 2.2(e), until such
shareholder shall surrender such IPC Certificate in accordance
with the procedures set forth in this ARTICLE II. Following
the surrender of any such IPC Certificate or IPC Common Shares
in the IPC Share Register in accordance with the procedures set
forth in this ARTICLE II, such shareholder shall be
entitled to receive, in addition to the consideration set forth
in Section 2.1(a), without interest, (i) at the time
of such surrender, the amount of any dividends or other
distributions with a record date on or after the Effective Time
theretofore paid (but withheld pursuant to the immediately
preceding sentence) with respect to such whole Validus Common
Shares which a shareholder of IPC holding such IPC Certificate
is entitled to receive hereunder, and (ii) at the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time but
prior to surrender and a payment date subsequent to surrender
payable with respect to such whole Validus Common Shares which
such shareholder is entitled to receive hereunder.
(d) No Further Rights in IPC Common
Shares. All Consideration paid or issued upon
the surrender of title to IPC Common Shares in accordance with
the terms of this ARTICLE II (including any cash paid
pursuant to this ARTICLE II) shall be deemed to have
been issued (and paid) in full satisfaction of all rights
pertaining to the shareholders of IPC, in their capacity as
shareholders of IPC prior to the Effective Time.
A-4
There shall be no further registration of transfers on the share
transfer books of the Amalgamated Company of the IPC Common
Shares which were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective
Time. If, after the Effective Time, IPC Certificates are
presented to Validus or to the Amalgamated Company or to the
Exchange Agent for any reason, they shall be marked as cancelled
and exchanged in accordance with this ARTICLE II, except as
otherwise required by Law.
(e) No Fractional
Shares. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, no fraction of a Validus Common Share
will be issued in connection with the Amalgamation, and in lieu
thereof any shareholder of IPC who would otherwise have been
entitled to a fraction of a Validus Common Share, shall be paid
upon surrender of title to IPC Common Shares for exchange (and
after taking into account and aggregating IPC Common Shares
represented by all IPC Certificates surrendered by such holder,
or as set out in the IPC Share Register, as applicable) cash in
an amount (without interest) equal to the product obtained by
multiplying (i) the fractional share interest to which
such shareholder (after taking into account and aggregating all
IPC Common Shares represented by all IPC Certificates
surrendered by such shareholder or as set out in the IPC Share
Register, as applicable) would otherwise be entitled by
(ii) the Average Validus Share Price (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)).
(f) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed
Certificates. In the event any IPC
Certificates shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the
Exchange Agent shall issue in exchange for such lost, stolen or
destroyed certificates, upon the making of an affidavit of that
fact by the holder thereof, the Consideration and any dividends
or other distributions as may be required pursuant to this
ARTICLE II in respect of the IPC Common Shares represented
by such lost, stolen or destroyed certificates; provided
that Validus may, in its reasonable discretion and as a
condition precedent to the issuance thereof, require the owner
of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificates to deliver a bond
in such sum as it may reasonably direct as indemnity against any
claim that may be made against Validus or the Exchange Agent
with respect to the certificates alleged to have been lost,
stolen or destroyed.
(g) Termination of Exchange
Fund. Unless a longer period is prescribed by
applicable Law or Validus agreement with the Exchange
Agent, any portion of the Exchange Fund that remains
undistributed to the shareholders of IPC for six months after
the Effective Time shall be delivered to Validus, upon demand,
and any shareholders of IPC who have not theretofore complied
with this ARTICLE II shall thereafter look only to Validus
for payment of their claim for the Consideration and any
dividends or distributions with respect to Validus Common Shares.
(h) No Liability. To the extent
allowed under applicable Law, any Consideration and any
dividends or distributions with respect to Validus Common Shares
comprising the Consideration that remain undistributed to the
shareholders of IPC shall be delivered to and become the
property of Validus on the day immediately prior to the day that
such property is required to be delivered to any public official
pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar Law. None of Validus, Amalgamation Sub, Amalgamated
Company or the Exchange Agent shall be liable to any shareholder
of IPC for any such property delivered to Validus or to a public
official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat
or similar Law.
(i) Withholding. The Exchange
Agent, Validus and the Amalgamated Company shall be entitled to
deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable
pursuant to this Agreement to any shareholder of IPC such
amounts as it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to
the making of such payment under any provision of applicable Tax
Law. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by the Exchange
Agent, Validus or the Amalgamated Company, such withheld amounts
shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having
been paid to the holder of the IPC Common Shares in respect of
which such deduction and withholding was made. The parties agree
to cooperate with each other for purposes of determining whether
any Taxes are required to be withheld with respect to the
Amalgamation.
2.3 IPC Equity Awards.
(a) IPC Stock Options. Subject to
the terms and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective
Time, by virtue of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and without any action on the part of any holder of
any outstanding option to purchase IPC Common Shares under any
IPC Share Plan (as defined in
A-5
Section 3.2(a)), whether vested or unvested, exercisable or
unexercisable (each, an IPC Share Option),
each IPC Share Option that is outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior thereto shall cease to represent a right to
acquire IPC Common Shares and shall be converted into an option
(a New Option) to purchase, on the same terms
and conditions as were applicable under the terms of the IPC
Share Plan under which the IPC Share Option was granted and the
applicable award agreement thereunder (taking into account any
accelerated vesting thereunder), such number of Validus Common
Shares and at an exercise price per share determined as follows:
(1) Number of Shares. The number
of Validus Common Shares subject to a New Option shall be equal
to the product of (A) the number of IPC Common Shares
subject to such IPC Share Option immediately prior to the
Effective Time and (B) the Option Exchange Ratio (as
defined below), the product being rounded, if necessary, to the
nearest whole share; and
(2) Exercise Price. The exercise
price per Validus Common Share purchasable upon exercise of a
New Option shall be equal to (A) the per share exercise
price of the IPC Share Option divided by (B) the Option
Exchange Ratio, the quotient being rounded, if necessary, to the
nearest cent.
The foregoing adjustments shall (i) in the case of any IPC
Share Option that is intended to be an incentive stock
option under Section 422 of the Code, be determined
in a manner consistent with the requirements of
Section 424(a) of the Code and (ii) in the case of any
IPC Share Option that is not intended to be an incentive
stock option, be determined in a manner consistent with
the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.
As used herein, Option Exchange Ratio means
the sum of (i) the Exchange Ratio plus (ii) the
quotient of (A) the Per Share Cash Consideration divided by
(B) the closing price of a Validus Common Share on the New
York Stock Exchange on the last trading day immediately
preceding the Effective Time.
(b) IPC Other Awards. Subject to
the terms and conditions of this Agreement:
(1) at the Effective Time, by virtue of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and without any action on the
part of any holder of any outstanding right of any kind,
contingent or accrued, to acquire or receive IPC Common Shares
or share-based payments measured by the value of IPC Common
Shares, each outstanding award of any kind consisting of IPC
Common Shares or share-based payments measured by the value of
IPC Common Shares (including performance share units where the
performance period has ended prior to the Effective Time), in
each case that may be held, awarded, outstanding, payable or
reserved for issuance under any IPC Share Plan and any other IPC
Benefit Plan (as defined in Section 8.13(a)), but excluding
IPC Share Options and IPC performance share units for which the
performance period expires on or after the Effective Time (the
IPC Non-Performance Awards), shall be deemed
to be converted into the right to acquire or receive (x) a
cash payment equal to the product of (i) the number of IPC
Common Shares subject to such IPC Non-Performance Award
immediately prior to the Effective Time and (ii) the Per
Share Cash Consideration and (y) share-based payments
measured by the value of (as the case may be) the number of
Validus Common Shares equal to the product (rounded, if
necessary, to the nearest whole number) of (i) the number
of IPC Common Shares subject to such IPC Non-Performance Award
immediately prior to the Effective Time and (ii) the
Exchange Ratio. Except as specifically provided above, following
the Effective Time, each such right shall otherwise be subject
to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the
rights under the relevant IPC Share Plan or other IPC Benefit
Plan and the applicable award agreement thereunder (taking into
account any accelerated vesting thereunder) immediately prior to
the Effective Time; and
(2) at the Effective Time, by virtue of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and without any action on the
part of any holder of any IPC performance share unit, each
performance share unit granted under any IPC Share Plan or any
other IPC Benefit Plan (each a Performance Share
Unit) shall be deemed to be converted into the right
to acquire or receive (x) a cash payment equal to the
product of (i) the number of IPC Common Shares subject to
such Performance Share Unit immediately prior to the Effective
Time and (ii) the Per Share Cash Consideration and
(y) the number of Validus Common Shares equal to the
product (rounded, if necessary, to the nearest whole number) of
(i) the number of IPC
A-6
Common Shares to which each Performance Share Unit relates
immediately prior to the Effective Time and (ii) the
Exchange Ratio. Except as specifically provided above and as set
forth in Section 2.3(b)(2) of the IPC Disclosure Letter,
following the Effective Time, each such right shall otherwise be
subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to
the rights under the relevant IPC Share Plan or any other IPC
Benefit Plan and the applicable award agreement thereunder
(including by taking into account any accelerated vesting
thereunder) immediately prior to the Effective Time. Performance
Share Units and IPC Non-Performance Awards shall be,
collectively, referred to as the IPC Other
Awards.
(c) Corporate Actions. Prior to
the Effective Time, IPC, or its board of directors or an
appropriate committee thereof, shall take all action necessary
on its part to give effect to the provisions of
Sections 2.3(a) and (b) and shall take such other
actions reasonably requested by Validus to give effect to the
foregoing (including obtaining the consent of the holder of or
amending the terms of any IPC Share Options, IPC Other Awards or
any IPC Share Plan). IPC shall take all actions necessary to
ensure that, from and after the Effective Time, none of IPC,
Validus, the Amalgamated Company or any of their respective
subsidiaries will be required to deliver IPC Common Shares or
other capital stock of IPC to any person pursuant to or in
settlement of IPC Share Options or IPC Other Awards at or after
the Effective Time.
(d) Registration. If registration
of any interests in the IPC Share Plans or any other IPC Benefit
Plan or the Validus Common Shares issuable thereunder is
required under the Securities Act, Validus shall file with the
SEC within five business days after the Effective Time a
registration statement on
Form S-8
(or any successor or other appropriate forms) with respect to
such interests of Validus Common Shares, and shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of
such registration statement (and maintain the current status of
the prospectus or the prospectuses contained therein) for so
long as the relevant IPC Share Plans or other IPC Benefit Plans,
as applicable, remain in effect and such registration of
interests therein or the Validus Common Shares issuable
thereunder continues to be required.
(e) Notice to Equity Award
Holders. As soon as practicable after the
Effective Time, Validus shall deliver to the holders of IPC
Share Options and IPC Other Awards appropriate notices setting
forth such holders rights pursuant to any IPC Share Plan
or IPC Benefit Plan and agreements evidencing such IPC Share
Options and IPC Other Awards and stating that the IPC Share
Plans or IPC Benefit Plans and such IPC Share Options and IPC
Other Awards and agreements have been assumed by Validus and
shall continue in effect on the same terms and conditions
(subject to the adjustments required by this Section 2.3
after giving effect to the Amalgamation and the terms of the IPC
Share Plans or IPC Benefit Plans).
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
Except as (i) set forth in the correspondingly identified
subsection of the disclosure letter delivered by Validus to IPC
simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement by Validus
(the Validus Disclosure Letter) or the
disclosure letter delivered by IPC to Validus simultaneously
with the execution of this Agreement by IPC (the IPC
Disclosure Letter and each of the Validus Disclosure
Letter and the IPC Disclosure Letter, a Disclosure
Letter), as the case may be, or (ii) disclosed
in the relevant partys SEC Documents filed with the SEC on
or after January 1, 2008, and prior to the date of this
Agreement (excluding any disclosures set forth in any risk
factor section or forward-looking statements contained therein),
IPC hereby represents and warrants to Validus, and Validus (and
Amalgamation Sub with respect to Sections 3.1(a), 3.1(c),
3.3 and 3.9(c)) hereby represents and warrants to IPC, to the
extent applicable, in each case with respect to itself and its
subsidiaries, as follows:
3.1 Organization, Standing and Power.
(a) Each of it and its subsidiaries is a company or other
legal entity duly organized and validly existing and in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions which recognize such
concept) under the Laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization, has all requisite power and authority to own,
lease and operate its properties and to carry on its business as
now being conducted, and is duly qualified to do business in
each jurisdiction in which the nature of its business or the
ownership or leasing of its properties makes such
A-7
qualification necessary, except where the failure to be so
qualified has not had and would not be reasonably expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect.
(b) The copies of its memorandum of association and
bye-laws incorporated by reference in its
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, are true, complete
and correct copies of such documents, are in full force and
effect and have not been amended or otherwise modified, except
as they may be or have been amended or otherwise modified
pursuant to the IPC Bye-Law Amendment.
(c) Validus and Amalgamation Sub represent to IPC that:
(i) true and complete copies of the memorandum of
association and bye-laws of Amalgamation Sub, each as in effect
as of the date of this Agreement, have previously been made
available to IPC, (ii) Amalgamation Sub was formed by
Validus solely for the purpose of effecting the Amalgamation and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and
(iii) Amalgamation Sub has not conducted any business
prior to the date hereof and has no, and immediately prior to
the Effective Time will have no, assets, liabilities or
obligations of any nature other than those incident to its
formation and pursuant to this Agreement.
3.2 Capital Structure.
(a) Its authorized share capital and outstanding common
shares as of the date set forth in the corresponding section of
its Disclosure Letter, including any shares reserved for
issuance upon the exercise or payment of outstanding warrants
and outstanding stock options or other equity related awards
(such stock option and other equity-based award plans,
agreements and programs, collectively, in the case of Validus,
the Validus Share Plans and, in the case of
IPC, the IPC Share Plans), is described in
the corresponding section of its Disclosure Letter. In the case
of Validus, none of its Common Shares are held by it or by its
subsidiaries. In the case of IPC, its Common Shares that are
held by it and its subsidiaries are described in the
corresponding section of its Disclosure Letter. All of its
outstanding Common Shares have been duly authorized and validly
issued and are fully paid and nonassessable and not subject to
preemptive rights. Section 3.2(a) of its Disclosure Letter
sets forth a list of all warrants, options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units or other equity awards outstanding as of
the date hereof.
(b) From January 1, 2009, to the date hereof, it has
not issued or permitted to be issued any common shares, share
appreciation rights or securities exercisable or exchangeable
for or convertible into shares in its or any of its
subsidiaries share capital.
(c) It or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries owns all of
the issued and outstanding shares in the share capital of its
subsidiaries, beneficially and of record, and all such shares
are fully paid and nonassessable, are not subject to preemptive
rights and are free and clear of any claim, lien or encumbrance.
(d) No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness
having the right to vote (or which are convertible into or
exercisable for securities having the right to vote) on any
matters on which shareholders may vote (Voting
Debt) of it or any of its subsidiaries are issued or
outstanding.
(e) Except for options or other equity-based awards issued
or to be issued under the Validus Share Plans (in the case of
Validus) or the IPC Share Plans (in the case of IPC), there are
no options, warrants, calls, convertible or exchangeable
securities, rights, commitments or agreements of any character
to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it
or any such subsidiary is bound (i) obligating it or any
of its subsidiaries to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of the share
capital or any Voting Debt or other equity rights of it or any
of its subsidiaries, (ii) obligating it or any of its
subsidiaries to grant, extend or enter into any such option,
warrant, call, convertible or exchangeable security, right,
commitment or agreement or (iii) that provide the
economic equivalent of an equity ownership interest in it or any
of its subsidiaries.
(f) None of it or any of its subsidiaries is a party to any
member or shareholder agreement, voting trust agreement or
registration rights agreement relating to any equity securities
of it or any of its subsidiaries or any other agreement relating
to disposition, voting or dividends with respect to any equity
securities of it or any of its subsidiaries. There are no
outstanding contractual obligations of it or any of its
subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
shares in the share capital of it or any of its subsidiaries.
A-8
(g) Since January 1, 2009, through the date of this
Agreement, it has not declared, set aside, made or paid to its
shareholders dividends or other distributions on the outstanding
shares in its share capital.
(h) It has not waived any voting cut-back, transfer
restrictions or similar provisions of its or its
subsidiaries bye-laws with respect to any of its or their
shareholders, except for such waivers set forth in its bye-laws.
3.3 Authority; Non-Contravention.
(a) It has all requisite corporate power and authority to
enter into this Agreement and, subject to obtaining the Required
Validus Vote (as defined in Section 3.10(a)) (in the case
of Validus) or the Required IPC Vote (as defined in
Section 3.10(b)) (in the case of IPC), to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on its part and no other corporate proceedings
on its part are necessary to authorize this Agreement and
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, subject to the
Required Validus Vote (in the case of Validus) or the Required
IPC Vote (in the case of IPC). This Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by it and (assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by the other parties
hereto) constitutes a valid and binding obligation of it,
enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except to
the extent enforcement is limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws
of general applicability relating to or affecting
creditors rights and by general equitable principles.
(b) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
it nor the consummation by it of the transactions contemplated
hereby, nor compliance by it with any of the terms or provisions
hereof, will (i) violate any provision of the
memorandum of association or bye-laws of it (as they may be or
have been modified, in the case of IPC, pursuant to the IPC
Bye-Law Amendment) or the memorandum of association, bye-laws or
equivalent organizational documents of any of its subsidiaries
or (ii) assuming that the consents, approvals, orders,
authorizations, registrations, declarations and filings referred
to in Section 3.3(c) are duly obtained or made, (A)
violate any Law applicable to it or any of its subsidiaries or
any of their respective properties or assets or (B)
violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any provision of
or the loss of any benefit under, constitute a default (or an
event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would
constitute a default) under, result in the cancellation,
suspension, non-renewal or termination of or a right of
termination or cancellation under, accelerate the performance
required by, or result in the creation of any lien, pledge,
security interest, charge or other encumbrance upon (1)
any Permit (as defined in Section 3.5(a)) or (2) any
of the respective properties or assets of it or any of its
subsidiaries under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions
of any loan or credit agreement, note, mortgage, indenture,
lease, Validus Benefit Plan (as defined in Section 8.13(a))
(in the case of Validus) or IPC Benefit Plan (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)) (in the case of IPC) or other agreement,
obligation or instrument to which it or any of its subsidiaries
is a party, or by which they or any of their respective
properties or assets may be bound or affected, except (with
respect to clause (ii)) for such violations, conflicts or
breaches that have not had and would not be reasonably expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect.
(c) No consent, approval, order or authorization of, or
registration, declaration or filing with, any court,
administrative agency or commission or other governmental
authority, body, agency, official or instrumentality, domestic
or foreign, or self-regulatory organization or other similar
non-governmental regulatory body (each, a Governmental
Entity), is required to be made or obtained by it or
any of its subsidiaries in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by it or the consummation by it of
the transactions contemplated hereby, except for (i) the
filing of the Amalgamation Application and related attachments
with the Registrar, (ii) the written notification to the
Bermuda Monetary Authority regarding Validus acquisition
of the IPC Common Shares, (iii) such other applications,
filings, authorizations, orders and approvals as may be required
under applicable Laws (including all applicable Insurance Laws)
of any jurisdiction and any approvals thereof, which are set
forth in Section 3.3(c) of its Disclosure Letter,
(iv) the filing with the SEC of such registrations,
prospectuses, reports and other materials as may be required in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby, including the Joint Proxy Statement/ Prospectus (as
defined in Section 5.1(a)), and the obtaining from the SEC
of such orders as may be required in connection therewith,
A-9
(v) compliance with any applicable requirements of
NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange (the
NYSE), as applicable, (vi) in the case
of Validus, such filings and approvals as are required to be
made or obtained under the securities or Blue Sky
Laws of various jurisdictions in connection with the issuance of
the Validus Common Shares pursuant to this Agreement, and
(vii) for any other such consent, approval, order or
authorization of, or registration, declaration or filings, the
failure of which to obtain or make would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
3.4 SEC Documents; Regulatory Reports; Undisclosed
Liabilities.
(a) It and its subsidiaries have timely filed all required
reports, schedules, registration statements and other documents
with the SEC since January 1, 2008 (the SEC
Documents). As of their respective dates of filing
with the SEC (or, if amended or superseded by a filing prior to
the date hereof, as of the date of such filing), the SEC
Documents complied in all material respects with the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
as the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
thereunder applicable to such SEC Documents, and none of its or
its subsidiaries SEC Documents when filed contained any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. The financial statements
of it and its subsidiaries included in its SEC Documents
complied, as of their respective dates of filing with the SEC
(or, if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date
hereof, as of the date of such filing), with all applicable
accounting requirements and with the published rules and
regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared
in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the
periods involved (except as may be disclosed therein) and fairly
present in all material respects the consolidated financial
position of it and its consolidated subsidiaries and the
consolidated results of operations, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows of such companies as of
the dates and for the periods shown. As of the date hereof,
there are no outstanding written comments from the SEC with
respect to its SEC Documents.
(b) Except for (i) those liabilities that are
reflected or reserved for in its consolidated financial
statements included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC
prior to the date of this Agreement, (ii) liabilities and
obligations incurred pursuant to this Agreement,
(iii) liabilities incurred since December 31, 2008,
(1) in the ordinary course of business (including claims
and any related litigation or arbitration arising in the
ordinary course of business under Policies (as defined in
Section 3.12(g))) or (2) pursuant to any Reinsurance
Agreements (as defined in Section 3.12(e)) issued or
assumed, as the case may be, by one of its Insurance Entities
(as defined in Section 3.12(a)) for which adequate claims
reserves have been established, and (iv) liabilities which
have not had and would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, it
and its subsidiaries do not have, and since December 31,
2008, it and its subsidiaries have not incurred, any liabilities
or obligations of any nature whatsoever (whether accrued,
absolute, contingent or otherwise and whether or not required to
be reflected in its financial statements in accordance with
GAAP).
3.5 Compliance with Applicable Laws and Reporting
Requirements. Except as has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect:
(a) It and its subsidiaries hold in full force and effect
all permits, certifications, registrations, permissions,
consents, franchises, concessions, licenses, variances,
exemptions, orders, approvals and authorizations of all
Governmental Entities necessary for the ownership and conduct of
the business of it and its subsidiaries (including any insurance
licenses or permissions from insurance regulatory authorities)
in each of the jurisdictions in which it or its subsidiaries
currently conduct or operate its business (the
Permits), and it and its subsidiaries
are in compliance with the terms and requirements of its Permits
and any applicable law, statute, ordinance, common law,
arbitration award, or any rule, regulation, judgment, order,
writ, injunction, decree, agency requirement or published
interpretation of any Governmental Entity, including all
relevant bye-laws and regulations of the Council and Society of
Lloyds incorporated under the Lloyds Act of 1871 to
1982 of England and Wales (Lloyds) in
each of the jurisdictions in which it or its subsidiaries
currently conduct business or operate (collectively
Laws).
A-10
The businesses of it and its subsidiaries have not been, and are
not being, conducted in violation of any applicable Laws
(including the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, as amended, the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78dd 1 et
seq., as amended (or any other similar applicable foreign,
federal, or state legal requirement), anti-money laundering
laws, anti-terrorism laws, all applicable requirements relating
to the sale, issuance, marketing, advertising and administration
of insurance products (including licensing and appointments) and
all Laws regulating the business and products of insurance and
all applicable orders and directives of insurance regulatory
authorities (the Insurance Laws) and all
applicable laws or other legal requirements relating to the
retention of
e-mail and
other information). It and its subsidiaries have not received,
at any time since January 1, 2007, any written notice or
communication from any Governmental Entity regarding any actual,
alleged, or potential violation of, or a failure to comply with,
any Laws or the terms and requirements of any Permit or any
actual or potential revocation, withdrawal, suspension,
cancellation, modification, or termination of any Permit. All
applications required to have been filed for the renewal of each
Permit or other filings required to be made with respect to each
Permit held by it or its subsidiaries have been duly filed on a
timely basis with the appropriate Governmental Entity.
(b) It has established and maintains disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the Exchange Act). Such disclosure controls and procedures
are designed to ensure that material information relating to it,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to its
principal executive officer and its principal financial officer
by others within those entities, particularly during the periods
in which the periodic reports required under the Exchange Act
are being prepared. Such disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer to material information required to
be included in its periodic reports under the Exchange Act and
ensure that the information required to be disclosed in its SEC
Documents is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms. It
and its subsidiaries maintain a system of internal controls over
financial reporting sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The
records, systems, controls, data and information of it and its
subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated under
means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic
process, whether computerized or not) that are under the
exclusive ownership and direct control of it or its subsidiaries
or accountants (including all means of access thereto and
therefrom) and are held or maintained in such places as may be
required under all applicable Laws (including Insurance Laws).
It has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of
internal controls prior to the date hereof, to its auditors and
audit committee (i) any significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect its
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information and (ii) any fraud that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in internal controls.
(c) There are no outstanding loans or other extensions of
credit made by it or any of its subsidiaries to any of its
executive officers (as defined in
Rule 3b-7
under the Exchange Act) or directors.
(d) Since January 1, 2007, in the case of IPC, it has
complied with the applicable listing and corporate governance
rules and regulations of NASDAQ . Since July 24, 2007, in
the case of Validus, it has complied with the applicable listing
and corporate governance rules and regulations of the NYSE.
(e) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to,
or has any commitment to become a party to, any joint venture,
off-balance sheet partnership or any similar contract (including
any contract relating to any transaction or relationship between
or among it and any of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and
any unconsolidated affiliate, including any structured finance,
special purpose or limited purpose entity, on the other hand, or
any off-balance sheet arrangement (as defined in
Item 303(a) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC)), where the result, purpose or intended effect of
such contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction
involving, or material liabilities of, it or any of its
subsidiaries in the SEC Documents.
3.6 Legal and Arbitration Proceedings and
Investigations. Except for litigation or
arbitration arising in the ordinary course of business from
claims under Policies or Reinsurance Agreements issued or
assumed, as
A-11
the case may be, by one of its Insurance Entities for which
adequate claims reserves have been established, there are no
claims, suits, actions, proceedings, arbitrations or other
proceedings whether judicial, arbitral or administrative, civil
or criminal (Legal Proceedings) pending or,
to its knowledge, threatened, against it or any of its
subsidiaries, any present or former officer, director or
employee thereof in his or her capacity as such or any person
for whom it or its subsidiaries may be liable or any of their
respective properties, that, if determined or resolved adversely
against it, would be reasonably expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, nor are there
any writs, judgments, decrees, injunctions, rules or orders of
any Governmental Entity or arbitrator binding upon it or any of
its subsidiaries or any of their respective assets or properties
that would be reasonably expected to have, individually or in
the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. To its knowledge,
since January 1, 2007, there have been no formal or
informal SEC inquiries, investigations or subpoenas, other
Governmental Entity inquiries or investigations or internal
investigations or material whistle-blower complaints pending or
otherwise threatened involving it or its subsidiaries or any
current or former officer or director thereof in his or her
capacity as such, other than, in each case, those that if
determined or resolved adversely against it would not be
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect.
3.7 Taxes.
(a) All material Tax Returns (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)) required by applicable Law to be filed
with any Taxing Authority (as defined in Section 8.13(a))
by, or on behalf of, it or any of its subsidiaries have been
filed when due (taking into account extensions of time to file)
in accordance with all applicable Laws, and all such Tax Returns
are true, correct and complete in all material respects. All
such Tax Returns have been examined by the appropriate Taxing
Authority or the period for assessment of the Taxes (as defined
in Section 8.13(a)) in respect of which such Tax Returns
were required to be filed has expired.
(b) There are no liens for any Taxes upon the assets of it
or any of its subsidiaries, other than (i) statutory
liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or (ii) liens
which are being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings, for which adequate reserves have been established
on its financial statements in accordance with GAAP and
Applicable SAP.
(c) It and each of its subsidiaries have paid or have
withheld and remitted to the appropriate Taxing Authority all
material Taxes due and payable, and have established in
accordance with GAAP and Applicable SAP an adequate accrual for
all material Taxes not yet due and payable.
(d) There is no claim, audit, action, suit, proceeding,
examination or investigation now pending or, to its knowledge,
threatened against or with respect to it or any of its
subsidiaries in respect of any Tax or Tax Asset (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)), and any deficiencies asserted or
assessments made as a result of any claim, audit, suit,
proceeding, examination or investigation have been paid in full.
(e) It and each of its subsidiaries have withheld all
material amounts required to have been withheld by them in
connection with amounts paid or owed to (or any benefits or
property provided to) any employee, independent contractor,
creditor, shareholder or any other third party; such withheld
amounts were either duly paid to the appropriate Taxing
Authority or set aside in accounts for such purpose. It and each
of its subsidiaries have reported such withheld amounts to the
appropriate Taxing Authority and to each such employee,
independent contractor, creditor, shareholder or any other third
party, as required under Law.
(f) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to a
Tax allocation, sharing, indemnity or similar agreement (other
than indemnities included in ordinary course employment
contracts or leases) that will require any payment by it or any
of its subsidiaries of any Tax of another person after the
Closing Date.
(g) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has entered into
a reportable transaction within the meaning of
Treasury Regulations
Section 1.6011-4,
and neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has been a
material advisor to any such transaction within the
meaning of Section 6111 of the Code.
(h) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries (i) has
filed any extension of time within which to file any Tax Returns
that have not been filed, (ii) has entered into any
agreement or other arrangement waiving or extending the statute
of limitations or the period of assessment or collection of any
material Taxes, (iii) has
A-12
granted any power of attorney that is in force with respect to
any matters relating to any material Taxes, (iv) has
applied for a ruling from a Taxing Authority relating to any
material Taxes that has not been granted or has proposed to
enter into an agreement with a Taxing Authority that is pending,
or (v) has entered into any closing agreement
as described in Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar
provision of state, local or foreign Tax Law) or been issued any
private letter rulings, technical advance memoranda or similar
agreement or rulings by any Taxing Authority.
(i) None of its subsidiaries is now or has ever been a
United States real property holding corporation within the
meaning of Section 897(c)(2) of the Code.
(j) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has agreed to,
requested, or is required to include any adjustment under
Section 481 of the Code (or any corresponding provision of
applicable Law) by reason of a change in accounting method or
otherwise.
(k) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has elected to
be a pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
(l) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries organized
outside the United States has ever been engaged in a trade or
business in the United States within the meaning of
Section 864(b) of the Code or has ever had a permanent
establishment in the United States within the meaning of the tax
treaty between the United States and Bermuda.
(m) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has ever been a
member of an affiliated, combined, consolidated or unitary Tax
group for purposes of filing any Tax Return.
(n) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has been a
distributing corporation or a controlled corporation in a
transaction intended to be governed by Section 355 of the
Code.
(o) It and each of its subsidiaries currently satisfies
(assuming the relevant taxable year ended on the date this
representation is being given), and expects to satisfy with
respect to the taxable year in which the Closing Date falls,
either or both of the exceptions described in
Sections 953(c)(3)(A) and (B) of the Code so that none
of its United States shareholders (within the
meaning of Section 953(c) of the Code) will be required to
include in income any of its or its subsidiaries
related person insurance income (within the meaning
of Section 953(c)(2) of the Code) by operation of
Sections 951(a) and 953(c)(5) of the Code.
(p) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has received any
notice or inquiry from any Governmental Entity outside of
Bermuda to the effect that any of it or its subsidiaries that
are domiciled or formed in Bermuda are subject to any Tax other
than excise taxes or any Tax assessed by Bermuda.
(q) Other than as disclosed with respect to
Section 3.7(l), Section 3.7(p) or this
Section 3.7(q), it and each of its subsidiaries has never
been subject to net basis taxation in any country, or been tax
resident or tax domiciled in any country, other than the country
in which it and each of its subsidiaries, respectively, is
organized.
(r) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries organized
outside the United Kingdom has or has ever had a permanent
establishment in the United Kingdom for United Kingdom Tax
purposes.
(s) No material transaction or arrangement involving it or
any of its subsidiaries has taken place or is in existence which
is such that it has resulted, or is reasonably likely to result,
in the income, profits or gains of it or of any subsidiary being
adjusted for Tax purposes in any jurisdiction in accordance with
applicable transfer pricing or thin capitalization laws.
(t) As of the date of this Agreement, neither it nor any of
its subsidiaries has taken or agreed to take any action, or is
aware of any agreement, plan or circumstance, that, to its
knowledge, would reasonably be expected to prevent the
Amalgamation from constituting a reorganization,
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
3.8 Absence of Certain Changes or
Events. Since January 1, 2009,
(i) there has not been any event, change, circumstance,
state of facts or effect, alone or in combination, that has had
or would be reasonably
A-13
likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect, and (ii) neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries has taken any action or failed to take any action
that would have resulted in a breach in any material respect of
Section 4.1 had such section been in effect since
January 1, 2009, except, with respect to IPC, for any
action taken or failed to be taken in connection with or in
furtherance of the Max Agreement that has been publicly
disclosed by IPC in a filing with the SEC made prior to
5:30 p.m., New York City time, at least one business day
prior to the date of this Agreement.
3.9 Board Approval.
(a) In the case of IPC, the board of directors of IPC, by
resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote at a meeting duly
called and held, has (i) determined that the
Consideration and the Exchange Ratio constitutes fair value for
each IPC Common Share in accordance with the Companies Act and
deemed it fair to, advisable to and in the best interests of IPC
to enter into this Agreement and to consummate, the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, (ii)
adopted this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement and
authorized and approved the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
(iii) recommended that the shareholders of IPC vote in
favor of matters constituting the Required IPC Vote (as defined
in Section 3.10(b)) (the IPC
Recommendation) and (iv) determined that the
amendments to IPCs bye-laws attached as
Exhibit B (the IPC Bye-Law
Amendment) are advisable to and in the best interests
of IPC, and directed that such matters be submitted for
consideration by IPC shareholders at the IPC Shareholders
Meeting (as defined in Section 5.1(c)).
(b) In the case of Validus, the board of directors of
Validus, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote at a
meeting duly called and held, has (i) deemed it fair to,
advisable and in the best interests of Validus to enter into
this Agreement and to consummate the Share Issuance and the
other transactions contemplated hereby, (ii) adopted this
Agreement and authorized and approved the Share Issuance, and
(iii) recommended that the shareholders of Validus vote
in favor of the matters constituting the Required Validus Vote
(as defined in Section 3.10(a)) (the Validus
Recommendation) and directed that such matters be
submitted for consideration by Validus shareholders at the
Validus Shareholders Meeting (as defined in Section 5.1(b)).
(c) In the case of Validus, the board of directors of
Amalgamation Sub, by unanimous written consent without a
meeting, has (i) determined that this Agreement and the
Amalgamation are advisable and in the best interests of
Amalgamation Sub and its sole shareholder, (ii) adopted
this Agreement and authorized and approved the Amalgamation and
(iii) recommended that the sole shareholder of
Amalgamation Sub approve such matters. The sole shareholder of
Amalgamation Sub has approved this Agreement, the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby.
3.10 Vote Required.
(a) In the case of Validus, the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders of
Validus at which a quorum is present in accordance with the
bye-laws of Validus to approve the Share Issuance (the
Required Validus Vote) is the only vote of
the holders of any class or series of Validus capital stock
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) In the case of IPC, the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders of IPC at
which a quorum is present in accordance with the bye-laws of
IPC, in each case, to approve the IPC Bye-Law Amendment and,
assuming approval of the IPC Bye-Law Amendment, adopt this
Agreement and approve the Amalgamation (provided,
however, if the IPC Bye-Law Amendment is not approved,
the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the votes cast at such
meeting shall be required to adopt this Agreement and approve
the Amalgamation) (the Required IPC Vote and,
together with the Required Validus Vote, the Required
Shareholder Votes) is the only vote of the holders of
any class or series of IPC share capital necessary to approve
this Agreement and consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby (including the Amalgamation).
3.11 Agreements with
Regulators. Except as required by Insurance
Laws of general applicability and the insurance licenses
maintained by its Insurance Entities or as does not have and
would not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, there are no written
agreements, memoranda of understanding, commitment letters or
similar undertakings binding on it or any of its
A-14
subsidiaries or to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a
party, on one hand, and any Governmental Entity is a party or
addressee, on the other hand, or any orders or directives by, or
supervisory letters or
cease-and-desist
orders from, any Governmental Entity, nor has it nor any of its
subsidiaries adopted any board resolution at the request of any
Governmental Entity, in each case specifically with respect to
it or any of its subsidiaries, which (a) limit the
ability of it or any of its Insurance Entities to issue Policies
or enter into Reinsurance Agreements; (b) require any
divestiture of any investment of any subsidiary; (c) in
any manner relate to the ability of any of its subsidiaries to
pay dividends; (d) require any investment of its
Insurance Entities to be treated as
non-admitted
assets (or the local equivalent) or (e) otherwise
restrict the conduct of business of it or any subsidiary, nor
has it been advised by any Governmental Entity that it is
contemplating any such undertakings.
3.12 Insurance Matters.
(a) Each of its subsidiaries which by virtue of its
operations and activities is required to be licensed as an
insurance company, insurance intermediary, Lloyds
corporate member or Lloyds managing agent (collectively,
the Insurance Entities) is listed in
Section 3.12 of its Disclosure Letter, together with the
jurisdiction of domicile thereof. None of its Insurance Entities
is commercially domiciled in any other jurisdiction or is
otherwise treated as domiciled in a jurisdiction other than that
of its incorporation. It conducts all of its insurance
operations that are required to be conducted through a licensed
insurance company or insurance intermediary, through its
Insurance Entities, each of which is duly licensed or authorized
as an insurance company, and/or, where applicable, a reinsurer,
insurance intermediary, Lloyds corporate member or
Lloyds managing agent, in its jurisdiction of
incorporation and each other jurisdiction where it is required
to be so licensed or authorized and is duly licensed or
authorized in each such jurisdiction for each line of business
written therein, except where the failure to so conduct its
insurance operations or the failure of its Insurance Entities to
be so licensed or authorized has not had and would not be
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Since January 1, 2007, each of its Insurance
Entities has timely filed or submitted all annual and, to the
extent applicable Law requires, quarterly and other periodic
statements, together with all exhibits, interrogatories, notes,
schedules and any actuarial opinions, affirmations or
certifications or other supporting documents in connection
therewith, required to be filed with or submitted to the
appropriate insurance regulatory authorities of the jurisdiction
in which it is domiciled or commercially domiciled on forms
prescribed or permitted by such authority (as filed through the
date hereof and thereafter, collectively, the Statutory
Statements), except, in each case, as has been cured
or resolved to the satisfaction of such insurance regulatory
authority without imposition of any material penalty or as would
not, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect.
It has delivered or made available to the other parties, to the
extent permitted by applicable Laws, (i) true and complete
copies of all annual Statutory Statements filed with
Governmental Entities for each of its Insurance Entities for the
periods beginning January 1, 2007 through the date hereof
and, once duly and timely filed, thereafter, and the quarterly
Statutory Statements for each of its Insurance Entities for the
quarterly periods ended September 30, 2008, through the
date hereof and, once duly and timely filed, thereafter, each in
the form (including exhibits, annexes and any amendments
thereto) filed with the applicable insurance regulatory
authority and (ii) true and complete copies of all
examination reports (and has notified the other party of any
pending examinations) of any insurance regulatory authorities
received by it on or after January 1, 2007 through the date
hereof relating to its Insurance Entities. Financial statements
included in its Statutory Statements were prepared in conformity
with Applicable SAP, consistently applied for the periods
covered thereby, were prepared in accordance with the books and
records of the applicable Insurance Entity, and present fairly
in all material respects the statutory financial position of the
relevant Insurance Entity as of the respective dates thereof and
the results of operations, cash flows, and changes in capital
and surplus (or stockholders equity, as applicable) of
such Insurance Entity for the respective periods then ended. Its
Statutory Statements complied in all material respects with all
applicable Laws when filed or submitted and no material
violation or deficiency has been asserted in writing by any
Governmental Entity with respect to any of its Statutory
Statements that have not been cured or otherwise resolved to the
satisfaction of such Governmental Entity. The statutory balance
sheets and income statements included in its annual Statutory
Statements have
A-15
been audited by its independent auditors, and it has delivered
or made available to the other party true and complete copies of
all audit opinions related thereto for periods beginning
January 1, 2007 through the date hereof. Except as is
indicated therein, all assets that are reflected on its
subsidiaries Statutory Statements comply in all material
respects with all applicable Insurance Laws regulating the
investments of Insurance Entities and all applicable Insurance
Laws with respect to admitted assets and are in amount at least
equal to the minimum amount required by applicable Insurance
Laws. The financial statements included in its Statutory
Statement accurately reflect in all material respects the extent
to which, pursuant to applicable Laws and Applicable SAP, the
applicable Insurance Entity is entitled to take credit for
reinsurance (or any local equivalent concept).
(c) The loss reserves and other actuarial amounts of each
of its Insurance Entities contained in its Statutory Statements:
(i) were determined in accordance with generally accepted
actuarial standards and principles and other reasonable
qualitative methods materially consistently applied (except as
otherwise noted in such financial statements), (ii)
complied in all material respects with applicable Laws and were
computed on the basis of methodologies materially consistent
with those used in computing the corresponding reserves in the
prior fiscal years, except as otherwise noted in the financial
statements and notes thereto included in such Statutory
Statements, and (iii) include provisions for all
actuarial reserves and related items which are required to be
established in accordance with applicable Law. To its knowledge,
no facts or circumstances exist which would necessitate any
material increase in the statutorily required reserves above
those reflected in the most recent balance sheet included in the
Statutory Statements.
(d) Prior to the date of this Agreement, it has made
available to the other party true and complete copies of all
actuarial reports used as the basis for establishing the
reserves for each of its subsidiary Insurance Entities from and
after January 1, 2007, and all material attachments,
addenda, supplements and modifications thereto. To its
knowledge, any information and data furnished by it or any of
its subsidiaries to independent actuaries in connection with the
preparation of such actuarial reports were accurate in all
material respects. To its knowledge, such actuarial reports were
based upon an accurate inventory of Policies and Reinsurance
Agreements in force for it and its subsidiaries, as the case may
be, at the relevant time of preparation and were prepared in
conformity in all material respects with generally accepted
actuarial principles and other reasonable qualitative methods in
effect at such time (except as may be noted therein) and the
projections contained therein were properly prepared in
accordance with the assumptions stated therein.
(e) As of the date of this Agreement, all reinsurance or
retrocession treaties or agreements, slips, binders, cover notes
or other similar arrangements to which it or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or under which it or any of its
subsidiaries has any existing rights, obligations or liabilities
(the Reinsurance Agreements) are, and after
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will
continue to be, valid and binding obligations of it and its
subsidiaries (to the extent they are parties thereto or bound
thereby) and, to its knowledge, each other party thereto, in
accordance with their terms and are in full force and effect,
and it and each of its subsidiaries (to the extent they are
party thereto or bound thereby) and, to its knowledge, each
other party thereto has performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under each
Reinsurance Agreement, except as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries has received notice, nor does it have knowledge, of
any violation or default in respect of any obligation under (or
any condition which, with the passage of time or the giving of
notice or both, would result in such a violation or default), or
any intention to cancel, terminate or change the scope of rights
and obligations under, or not to renew, any Reinsurance
Agreement, except, in each case, as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Since January 1,
2007, (i) neither it nor its subsidiaries have received
any written notice from any party to a Reinsurance Agreement
that any amount of reinsurance ceded by it or such subsidiary to
such counterparty will be uncollectible or otherwise defaulted
upon, (ii) to its knowledge, no party to a Reinsurance
Agreement under which it or its subsidiary is the cedent is
insolvent or the subject of a rehabilitation, liquidation,
conservatorship, receivership, bankruptcy or similar proceeding,
(iii) to its knowledge, the financial condition of any
party to a Reinsurance Agreement under which it or its
subsidiary is the cedent is not impaired to the extent that a
default thereunder is reasonably anticipated, (iv) there
are no disputes under any Reinsurance Agreement other than
disputes in the ordinary
A-16
course for which adequate loss reserves have been established
and (v) its relevant subsidiary is entitled under any
applicable Law and Applicable SAP to take full credit in its
Statutory Statements for all amounts recoverable by it pursuant
to any Reinsurance Agreement under which it is the cedent and
all such amounts recoverable have been properly recorded in its
books and records of account (if so accounted therefor) and are
properly reflected in its Statutory Statements, except as has
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(f) Except as has not had and would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect, with respect to any Reinsurance Agreement for
which the ceding insurer party thereto is taking credit on its
most recent Statutory Statements, to its knowledge, from and
after January 1, 2007 (i) there has been no separate
written or oral agreement between such ceding insurer and the
assuming reinsurer that would under any circumstances reduce,
limit, mitigate or otherwise affect any actual or potential loss
to the parties under any such Reinsurance Agreement, other than
inuring contracts that are explicitly defined in any such
Reinsurance Agreement, (ii) for each such Reinsurance
Agreement entered into, renewed or amended on or after
January 1, 2007, for which risk transfer is not reasonably
considered to be self-evident to the extent required by any
applicable provisions of SSAP No. 62, documentation
concerning the economic intent of the transaction and the risk
transfer analysis evidencing the proper accounting treatment is
available for review by the relevant Governmental Entities for
each of it and its subsidiaries, (iii) its subsidiary
that is a party thereto, and to its knowledge, any other party
thereto, complies and has complied from and after
January 1, 2007 with any applicable requirements set forth
in SSAP No. 62, and (iv) such Insurance Entity has
and had since January 1, 2007 appropriate controls in place
to monitor the use of reinsurance and comply with the provisions
of SSAP No. 62.
(g) All policies, policy forms, binders, slips, treaties,
certificates, insurance or reinsurance contracts or
participation agreements and other agreements of insurance or
reinsurance, whether individual or group (including all
applications, supplements, endorsements, riders and ancillary
agreements in connection therewith) and all amendments,
applications, brochures, illustrations and certificates
pertaining thereto (the Policies), in effect
as of the date of this Agreement, that are issued by it or its
subsidiaries and any and all marketing materials have been, to
the extent required under applicable Law, filed with or
submitted to and not objected to by such Governmental Entity
within the period provided for objection, and such Policies and
marketing materials comply with the Insurance Laws applicable
thereto and have been administered in accordance therewith,
except as has not had and would not be reasonably expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect. All premium rates established by it or its subsidiaries
that are required to be filed with or submitted to or approved
by Governmental Entities have been so filed, submitted or
approved, the premiums charged conform thereto and such premiums
comply with the Insurance Laws applicable thereto, except as has
not had and would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(h) To its knowledge, each insurance agent, general agent,
agency, producer, broker, reinsurance intermediary, program
manager, managing general agent and managing general underwriter
currently selling, issuing or underwriting business for or on
behalf of it or its subsidiaries (including it and its
subsidiaries salaried employees) (each, an
Agent) was duly licensed for the type of
activity and business conducted or written, sold, produced,
underwritten or managed. To its knowledge, each program manager,
managing general agent, third party administrator or claims
adjuster or manager, at the time such person managed or
administered business (including the administration, handling or
adjusting of claims) for or on behalf of it or its subsidiaries
(each, an Administrator) was duly licensed
for the type of activity conducted. To its knowledge, no Agent
or Administrator has materially violated or is currently in
violation in any material respect of any term or provision of
any Law applicable to the writing, sale, production,
underwriting or administration of business for it or its
subsidiaries, except for such failures or such violations which
have been cured, that have been resolved or settled through
agreements with applicable Governmental Entities or that are
barred by an applicable statute of limitations. Each Agent was
appointed and compensated by it or its subsidiaries in
compliance in all material respects with applicable Law and all
processes and procedures used in making inquiries with respect
of such Agent were undertaken in compliance in all material
respects with applicable Law. No Agent has binding authority on
behalf of it or its subsidiaries. As of the date of this
A-17
Agreement, no Agent accounting individually for 1% or more of
the total gross premiums of all of its Insurance Entities for
the year ended December 31, 2008, has indicated to it or
its subsidiaries in writing or, to its knowledge, orally that
such Agent will be unable or unwilling to continue its
relationship as an Agent with it or its subsidiary within twelve
months after the date hereof.
(i) Each of its Insurance Entities has duly and timely
filed all reports or other filings required to be filed with any
insurance regulatory authority in the manner prescribed therefor
under applicable Laws and Permits and no Governmental Entity has
asserted any deficiency or violation with respect thereto,
except as has been cured or resolved to the satisfaction of the
Government Entity or except, in each case, as has not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Without limiting the
foregoing, each of its and its subsidiaries submissions,
reports or other filings under applicable insurance holding
company statutes or other applicable Insurance Laws with respect
to contracts, agreements, arrangements and transactions between
or among Insurance Entities and their affiliates, and all
contracts, agreements, arrangements and transactions in effect
between any subsidiary that is an Insurance Entity and any
affiliate are in compliance with the requirements of all
applicable insurance holding company statutes or other such
Insurance Laws and all required approvals or deemed approvals of
insurance regulatory authorities with respect thereto have been
received or obtained, except as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(j) Copies (which are complete and correct in all material
respects) of all analyses, reports and other data prepared by or
on behalf of any of its Insurance Entities or submitted by or on
behalf of any such Insurance Entity to any insurance regulatory
authority relating to risk based capital calculations or
Insurance Regulatory Information Systems ratios have been
provided to the other party prior to the date of this Agreement.
(k) Except for regular periodic assessments in the ordinary
course of business, there are no material unpaid claims and
assessments against it or its subsidiaries, whether or not due,
by any insurance guaranty association (in connection with that
associations fund relating to insolvent insurers), joint
underwriting association, residual market facility or assigned
risk pool. No such material claim or assessment is pending and
neither it nor any subsidiary has received written notice of any
such material claim or assessment against it or its subsidiaries
by any insurance guaranty association, joint underwriting
association, residual market facility or assigned risk pool.
(l) Since July 2, 2007, Validus
and/or any
of its subsidiaries which participate in Lloyds:
(i) has not participated on any Lloyds syndicate
other than syndicate 1183; (ii) has not agreed to sell,
transfer or drop any of its rights to participate in
a Lloyds syndicate or offered to acquire rights to
participate on a Lloyds syndicated; (iii) has
complied with the franchise standards (including principles and
minimum standards, guidance and advice) issued by Lloyds
and (iv) all documents relating to the participation of it
or any of its subsidiaries participation at Lloyds
are in Lloyds standard form and have not been amended in
any way, including the standard managing agents agreement,
in each case, except as had not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
(m) Since July 2, 2007: (i) all funds held on
behalf of Lloyds syndicate 1183 are held in accordance
with the terms of the relevant premiums trust deed or other
deposit arrangement as required by the bye-laws, regulations,
codes of practice and mandatory directions and requirements
governing the conduct and management of underwriting business at
Lloyds from time to time and the provisions of any deed,
agreement or undertaking executed, made or given for compliance
with Lloyds requirements from time to time
(Lloyds Regulations) and
(ii) Validus
and/or any
of its subsidiaries required to do so have complied in all
material respects with all relevant regulations, directions,
notices and requirements in relation to the maintenance of Funds
at Lloyds (as defined in the Lloyds Membership
Byelaw (No. 5 of 2005)) in accordance with Lloyds
Regulations and any directions imposed on it or any of its
subsidiaries by Lloyds.
3.13 Investments; Derivatives.
(a) The information provided by it to the other party
related to its investment assets, including bonds, notes,
debentures, mortgage loans, real estate, collateral loans,
derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, caps, floors, foreign
exchange, and options or forward agreements) and all other
instruments of indebtedness, stocks,
A-18
partnership or joint venture interests and all other equity
interests, certificates issued by or interests in trusts,
alternative investments and direct or indirect investments in
hedge funds, whether entered into for its own or its
subsidiaries or their customers accounts (such investment
assets, together with all investment assets held between such
date and the Closing Date are referred to herein as the
Investment Assets) is true and complete
in all material respects as of May 31, 2009.
(b) As of the date of this Agreement, to its knowledge,
none of the Investment Assets is in default in the payment of
principal or interest or dividends.
(c) As of the date of this Agreement, to its knowledge, the
Investment Assets comply in all material respects with, and the
acquisition thereof complied in all material respects with, any
and all investment restrictions under applicable Law and its
Investment Policy (as hereinafter defined). Except for
Investment Assets sold in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as contemplated by this
Agreement, each of it and its subsidiaries, as applicable, has
good and marketable title to all of the Investment Assets it
purports to own, free and clear of all encumbrances except
Permitted Encumbrances (as defined in Section 8.13(a)). It
has provided a copy of its and its subsidiaries policies
with respect to the investment of the Investment Assets (its
Investment Policy) to the other party prior
to the date of this Agreement.
(d) To its knowledge, none of its Investment Assets is
subject to any capital calls or similar liabilities, or any
restrictions or suspensions on redemptions,
lock-ups,
gates, side-pockets,
stepped-up
fee provisions or other penalties or restrictions relating to
withdrawals or redemptions, except as would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
(e) Each agreement with each investment manager or
investment advisor providing services to it or any of its
subsidiaries was entered into, and the performance of each
investment manager is evaluated, in a commercially reasonable,
arms length manner.
(f) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries holds any
derivative instruments, including swaps, swaptions, caps,
floors, foreign exchange and option or forward agreements,
whether entered into for its account, or for the account of any
of its subsidiaries or their customers.
3.14 Material Contracts; Intercompany
Contracts.
(a) As of the date of this Agreement, neither it nor any of
its subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any contract (other
than any Policy or Reinsurance Agreement) (i) that is or
will be required to be filed by it as a material contract
pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC that is not already so filed; (ii) that
limits or purports to limit in any material respect either the
type of business in which it or any of its subsidiaries (or,
after giving effect to the Amalgamation, Validus or any of its
subsidiaries) may engage or the manner or locations in which any
of them may so engage in any business; (iii) that creates
a partnership, joint venture, strategic alliance or similar
arrangement with respect to any of its or its subsidiaries
material business or assets; (iv) that is an indenture,
credit agreement, loan agreement, security agreement, guarantee,
note, mortgage or other agreement providing for or guaranteeing
indebtedness in excess of $5,000,000; (v) that,
individually or together with related contracts, provides for
any acquisition, disposition, lease, license or use after the
date of this Agreement of assets, services, rights or properties
with a value or requiring annual fees in excess of $5,000,000 or
that comprise more than 15% of its business on a consolidated
basis; (vi) that is a collective bargaining agreement;
(vii) that involves or could reasonably be expected to
involve aggregate payments by or to it
and/or its
subsidiaries in excess of $5,000,000 in any twelve month period,
except for any contract that may be cancelled without penalty or
termination payments by it or its subsidiaries upon notice of
60 days or less; (viii) that includes an
indemnification obligation of it or any of its subsidiaries with
a maximum potential liability in excess of $5,000,000;
(ix) that is an investment advisory or investment
management agreement or arrangement to which it or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or under which any Investment Asset is
invested or managed or any third party has the right or power to
make discretionary or investment decisions with respect to any
Investment Asset; or (x) that would or would reasonably
be expected to, individually or in the aggregate, prevent,
materially delay or materially impede its ability to consummate
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or Validus
and its subsidiaries ability to own
and/or to
A-19
conduct the businesses after the Closing. Each such contract
described in clauses (i)-(x) is referred to herein
as a Material Contract.
(b) Each Material Contract is, and after the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will continue
to be, a valid and binding obligation of it and its subsidiaries
(to the extent they are parties thereto or bound thereby)
enforceable against it and, to its knowledge, each other party
thereto, in accordance with its terms and is in full force and
effect, and it and each of its subsidiaries (to the extent they
are party thereto or bound thereby) and, to its knowledge, each
other party thereto has performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under each Material
Contract, except where such failure to be valid and binding or
such non-performance has not had and would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect. Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
received written notice, nor does it have knowledge, of any
material violation or default in respect of any material
obligation under (or any condition which with the passage of
time or the giving of notice or both would result in such a
violation or default), or any intention to cancel, terminate,
change the scope of rights and obligations under or not to
renew, any Material Contract.
(c) Section 3.14(c) of Validus Disclosure Letter
sets forth all contracts, agreements, notes, leases, licenses
and other instruments between Validus and any of its affiliates
or between two or more subsidiaries of Validus.
Section 3.14(c) of IPCs Disclosure Letter sets forth
all contracts, agreements, notes, leases, licenses and other
instruments between IPC and any of its affiliates or between two
or more subsidiaries of IPC. Each Validus intercompany agreement
or IPC intercompany agreement, as the case may be, to which any
Insurance Entity is a party has been duly approved by each
Governmental Entity whose approval is required therefor, except
where the failure to obtain such approval has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
3.15 Employee Benefits and Executive
Compensation.
(a) It has disclosed its Compensation and Benefits Plans in
Section 3.15(a) of its Disclosure Letter and it has
delivered or made available, to the extent requested, to the
other party prior to the date of this Agreement correct and
complete copies of, (i) each of its material Compensation
and Benefit Plans (as defined in Section 8.13(a)),
(ii) each applicable trust agreement or other funding
arrangement for each such Compensation and Benefit Plan
(including insurance contracts), and all amendments thereto,
(iii) with respect to any such Compensation and Benefit
Plan that is intended to be tax-qualified or tax-preferred under
applicable Law, any applicable determination letter issued by
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and any other applicable
determination document issued by any equivalent non-
U.S. taxing or regulatory authority, in each case,
confirming the tax-qualified or tax-preferred status of such
Compensation and Benefit Plan, (iv) annual reports or
returns, audited or unaudited financial statements, actuarial
valuations and reports, and summary annual reports or other
reports prepared for any Compensation and Benefit Plan with
respect to the two most recently completed plan years, and
(v) the most recent summary plan description for any
Compensation and Benefit Plan and summary of any material
modifications thereto.
(b) Each of its Compensation and Benefit Plans is in
compliance with applicable Laws in all material respects and has
been administered in all material respects in accordance with
its terms. There are no actions, suits, investigations or claims
pending, or to its knowledge, threatened or anticipated (other
than routine claims for benefits) relating to any Compensation
and Benefit Plan.
(c) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has any
obligations for retiree health and retiree life benefits under
any Compensation and Benefit Plan other than with respect to
benefit coverage mandated by applicable Law. There has been no
amendment to, announcement by it or any of its subsidiaries
relating to, or change in employee participation in coverage
under, any Compensation and Benefit Plan which would materially
increase the expense of maintaining such plan above the level of
the expense incurred therefor for the most recent fiscal year.
(d) None of the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
the shareholder approval of the transactions contemplated
hereby, the termination of the employment of any of its or its
subsidiaries employees within a specified time of the
Effective Time or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby will
A-20
(i) result in any payment (including severance,
golden parachute, or otherwise), whether or not in conjunction
with a termination of employment, becoming due to any director
or any employee of it or any of its subsidiaries from it or any
of its subsidiaries under any Compensation and Benefit Plan or
otherwise, other than by operation of Law, (ii) increase
any benefits otherwise payable under any Compensation and
Benefit Plan, (iii) result in any acceleration of the
time of payment or vesting of any such benefit or funding
(through a grantor trust or otherwise) of any such payment or
benefit, (iv) limit or restrict the right of it to merge,
amend or terminate any Compensation and Benefit Plan or any
related trust, (v) cause a trust for any Compensation and
Benefit Plan to be required to be funded, or (vi) result
in payments under any Compensation and Benefit Plan which would
not be deductible under Section 280G of the Code or any
equivalent
non-U.S. tax
Law.
(e) Each of its Compensation and Benefit Plans that is
intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code
has received a favorable determination letter from the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service and nothing has occurred that
could reasonably be expected to cause the loss of such
qualification. Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
engaged in a transaction with respect to any Compensation and
Benefit Plan that would subject it or any of its subsidiaries to
a Tax or penalty imposed by either Section 4975 of the Code
or Section 502(i) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).
Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries (i) has an
obligation to contribute (as defined in ERISA
Section 4212) nor have they ever had an obligation to
contribute to a multiemployer plan (as defined in
ERISA Sections 4001(a)(3) and 3(37)(A)) or
(ii) maintains or contributes to, or has, within six years
preceding the date of this Agreement, maintained or contributed
to, an employee pension benefit plan (as defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA) subject to Title IV of ERISA or
Section 412 of the Code.
3.16 Labor Relations and Other Employment
Matters.
(a) None of its or its subsidiaries employees are
represented by any union with respect to their employment by it
or its subsidiaries, and no labor organization or group of
employees of it or any of its subsidiaries has made a pending
demand for recognition or certification to it or any of its
subsidiaries and there are no representation or certification
proceedings or petitions seeking a representation proceeding
presently pending or, to its knowledge, threatened to be brought
or filed with any labor relations tribunal or authority. Since
January 1, 2007, neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
experienced any material labor disputes, union organization
attempts or work stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts due to labor
disagreements.
(b) (i) No unfair labor practice charges, grievances
or complaints are pending or, to its knowledge, threatened
against it or any of its subsidiaries, (ii) no employee
of it at the officer level or above has given written notice to
it or any of its subsidiaries that any such employee intends to
terminate his or her employment with it or any of its
subsidiaries, (iii) to its knowledge, no employee or
former employee of it or any of its subsidiaries is in any
respect in violation of any term of any employment contract,
nondisclosure agreement (including any agreement relating of
trade secrets or proprietary information) or non-competition
agreement with it or any of its subsidiaries, and (iv) it
and its subsidiaries have materially complied with all
applicable Laws, contracts, policies, plans and programs
relating to employment, employment practices, compensation,
benefits, hours, terms and conditions of employment and the
termination of employment.
(c) Each of its employees has all work permits, immigration
permits, visas or other authorizations required by Law for such
employee given the duties and nature of such employees
employment and Section 3.16(c) of its Disclosure Letter
sets forth a true and complete list of such work permits,
immigration permits, visas or other authorizations currently
held by its employees.
3.17 Intellectual Property.
(a) It and each of its subsidiaries has sufficient rights
to use all of the Intellectual Property used in its and each of
its subsidiaries respective businesses as presently
conducted and as proposed to be conducted, all of which rights
shall survive unchanged the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The Intellectual Property owned
by it or its subsidiaries is (i) owned free and clear of
any claim, lien or encumbrance (other than Permitted
Encumbrances), and (ii) valid and subsisting, and is not
subject to
A-21
any outstanding order, judgment or decree adversely affecting
its or its subsidiaries use thereof, or rights thereto.
(b) Section 3.17 of its Disclosure Letter sets forth a
true list of (i) all registered trademarks and service
marks, all trademark and service mark applications, and all
domain names owned by it
and/or its
subsidiaries, (ii) all registered copyrights and copyright
applications owned by it
and/or its
subsidiaries, and (iii) all patents and patent applications
owned by it
and/or its
subsidiaries.
(c) Any underwriting model it has created or uses in its
business that, among other things, assesses policy risk and
premium (each an Underwriting Model) is
based, in all material respects, on information that is
confidential
and/or
proprietary to it (other than third-party vendor model
information contained therein). It owns exclusively, free and
clear of any claim, lien or encumbrance (other than Permitted
Encumbrances), all of the proprietary information (including all
Intellectual Property rights) upon which each Underwriting Model
is based.
(d) All of the rights in the Intellectual Property created
by its or any of its subsidiaries employees during the
course of their employment, including any software developed to
use the Underwriting Model, have been validly and irrevocably
assigned to it.
(e) It and each of its subsidiaries has taken all
reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of all Trade
Secrets (as hereinafter defined) that are owned, used or held by
it or each of its subsidiaries, and to its knowledge, such Trade
Secrets have not been used, disclosed to or discovered by any
person except pursuant to valid and appropriate non-disclosure
agreements which have not been breached.
(f) To its knowledge, neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise
violated the Intellectual Property rights of any third party
during the five (5) year period immediately preceding the date
of this Agreement. There is no litigation, opposition,
cancellation, proceeding, reexamination, objection or claim
pending, asserted or, to its knowledge, threatened against it or
any of its subsidiaries concerning the ownership, validity,
registerability, enforceability, infringement or use of, or
licensed right to use, any Intellectual Property. To its
knowledge, no valid basis exists for any such litigation,
opposition, cancellation, proceeding, objection or claim. To its
knowledge, no person is infringing, misappropriating or
otherwise violating any of its or its subsidiaries rights
in any Intellectual Property.
(g) It and its subsidiaries has each complied in all
material respects with (i) all applicable Laws, rules and
regulations regarding data protection and the privacy and
security of personal information, and (ii) their
respective privacy policies or commitments to their customers
and consumers.
3.18 Properties. Neither it nor
any of its subsidiaries owns any real property. It or one of its
subsidiaries has (a) a valid leasehold or sublease interest
or other comparable contract right in the real property that it
or any of its subsidiaries leases, subleases or otherwise
occupies without owning and (b) good, valid and marketable
title to, or has a valid leasehold, sublease interest or other
comparable contract right in, the other tangible assets and
properties necessary to the conduct of the business as currently
conducted, except (i) as have been disposed of in the
ordinary course of business, in each case free and clear of all
encumbrances except for Permitted Encumbrances, or (ii) as
has not had and would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. It
and its subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with
the terms of all such leases, and to its knowledge, all such
leases are in full force and effect.
3.19 Brokers or Finders. Other
than, in the case of IPC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
(JP Morgan) and, in the case of Validus,
Greenhill & Co., LLC (Greenhill),
no agent, broker, investment banker, financial advisor or other
firm or person is or will be entitled to any brokers or
finders fee or any other similar commission or fee that is
contingent on the consummation of any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by
or on behalf of it or any of its subsidiaries.
3.20 Investment Advisor. Neither
it nor any of its subsidiaries conducts activities of or is
required to be registered as an investment advisor
as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(2) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940. Neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries is required to be registered as an investment
company as defined under the Investment Company Act of
1940.
A-22
3.21 Opinion of Financial Advisor.
(a) In the case of IPC, the board of directors of IPC has
received the opinion of its financial advisor, JP Morgan, dated
the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of such date,
the Consideration to be paid to the holders of IPC Common Shares
pursuant to Section 2.1(a) is fair, from a financial point
of view, to such holders (other than Validus and its affiliates).
(b) In the case of Validus, the board of directors of
Validus has received the opinion of its financial advisor,
Greenhill, dated July 8, 2009, to the effect that, as of
such date, the Consideration to be paid pursuant to the
Amalgamation is fair, from a financial point of view, to Validus.
3.22 Takeover Laws. To its
knowledge as of the date of this Agreement, no fair
price, moratorium, control share
acquisition, interested shareholder or other
anti-takeover statute or regulation would reasonably be expected
to restrict or prohibit this Agreement, the Amalgamation or the
other transactions contemplated hereby by reason of it being a
party to this Agreement, performing its obligations hereunder
and consummating the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated hereby.
3.23 Termination of Max
Agreement. In the case of IPC, the Max
Agreement was validly terminated by Max on June 12, 2009 in
accordance with the terms thereof and, to the knowledge of IPC,
IPC has no liability thereunder, other than the payment of the
Max Termination Fee to the extent such termination fee may
become due and payable under the terms of the Max Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
COVENANTS
RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
4.1 Covenants of Validus and
IPC. During the period from the date of this
Agreement and continuing until the Effective Time, Validus and
IPC agree as to themselves and their respective subsidiaries
that, except as expressly contemplated or permitted by this
Agreement, as required by applicable Law, as set forth in
Section 4.1 of the Validus Disclosure Letter (in the case
of Validus) or Section 4.1 of the IPC Disclosure Letter (in
the case of IPC) or to the extent that IPC (in the case of
Validus) or Validus (in the case of IPC) shall otherwise consent
in writing, that it and its subsidiaries shall carry on their
respective businesses in the usual, regular and ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice (including, for the
avoidance of doubt, adhering to any operating guidelines and
policies, whether or not written) and use commercially
reasonable efforts to preserve intact their present business
organizations, maintain their Permits and preserve their
relationships with employees, investment advisers and managers,
customers, policyholders, reinsureds, retrocedents, regulators,
Agents, Administrators, lenders and financing providers and
others having business dealings with them. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, except as expressly required by
applicable Law or as set forth in Section 4.1 of the
Validus Disclosure Letter (in the case of Validus) or
Section 4.1 of the IPC Disclosure Letter (in the case of
IPC), Validus and IPC shall not, and shall not permit any of
their respective subsidiaries, except as expressly noted in a
subsection or clause that it is solely applicable to IPC and its
subsidiaries, to:
(a) (i) declare or pay, or propose to declare or
pay, any dividends on or make other distributions in respect of
any of its share capital or warrants (whether in cash, shares or
property or any combination thereof), except for (A)
dividends paid by a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary
to it or its subsidiaries and (B) subject to
Section 5.14, ordinary course quarterly dividends on its
common shares or (in the case of Validus) warrants with record
and payment dates consistent with past practice; provided
that any such dividend shall be at a rate no greater than the
rate paid by it during the fiscal quarter immediately preceding
the date of this Agreement; provided, further that
IPC may, prior to the Closing, declare and pay a one-time
dividend to the holders of IPC Common Shares in an aggregate
amount not to exceed any actual reduction occurring prior to the
Closing (with any such reduction having been paid over to and
received by IPC prior to the Closing) in the $50,000,000
termination fee contemplated by the Max Agreement (the
Max Termination Fee), (ii) split,
combine or reclassify, or propose to split, combine or
reclassify, any of its share capital, or issue or authorize or
propose the issuance or authorization of any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its
share
A-23
capital, or (iii) repurchase, redeem or otherwise
acquire, propose to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, any
shares of its (or any of its subsidiaries) share capital
or any securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares
of its (or any of its subsidiaries) share capital, other
than repurchases, redemptions or acquisitions by a wholly-owned
subsidiary of share capital or such other securities, as the
case may be, of another of its wholly-owned subsidiaries;
(b) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize or propose the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any shares of its (or any of its
subsidiaries) share capital of any class, any Voting Debt,
any share appreciation rights or any securities convertible into
or exercisable or exchangeable for, or any rights, warrants or
options to acquire, any such shares or Voting Debt, or enter
into any agreement with respect to any of the foregoing, other
than (i) the issuance of common shares required to be
issued upon the exercise or settlement of share options or other
equity related awards outstanding on the date hereof under the
Validus Share Plans or the IPC Share Plans, as the case may be,
or warrants (in the case of Validus), in each case, as in effect
on the date hereof, (ii) issuances by a wholly-owned
subsidiary of share capital or capital stock, as the case may
be, to it or another of its wholly-owned subsidiary and
(iii) the issuance of Validus Common Shares in connection
with the consummation of this Agreement;
(c) amend or propose to amend its memorandum of association
or bye-laws or equivalent organizational documents of any of its
subsidiaries (except in accordance with the IPC Bye-Law
Amendment) and shall not waive any requirement thereof (except,
in the case of Validus and its subsidiaries, any amendment or
waiver in connection with a transaction of the type described in
Section 4.1(d) that would not reasonably be expected to be
adverse in any material respect to persons who are shareholders
of IPC immediately prior to the Effective Time);
(d) with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries only,
(i) other than in connection with transactions related to
its Investment Assets entered into in accordance with its
Investment Policy or after obtaining the written consent of the
other parties hereto (which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed), acquire or agree to acquire, by
amalgamating, merging or consolidating with, by purchasing a
substantial equity interest in or a substantial portion of the
assets of, by forming a partnership or joint venture with, or by
any other manner, any corporation, partnership, association or
other business organization or division thereof, or any material
assets, rights or properties or (ii) other than in
connection with transactions related to its Investment Assets
entered into in accordance with its Investment Policy or that
results in the creation or incurrence of a Permitted
Encumbrance, sell, lease, assign, transfer, license, encumber,
abandon or otherwise dispose of, or agree to sell, lease,
assign, transfer, license, encumber, abandon or otherwise
dispose of, any of its assets, product lines, businesses, rights
or properties (including capital stock of its subsidiaries and
indebtedness of others held by it and its subsidiaries);
(e) other than any Validus Benefit Plan, as applicable,
other than any IPC Benefit Plan, as applicable (which is subject
to paragraph (k) below) or as contemplated by
Section 6.2(f) or Section 6.3(f), as the case may be:
amend, modify or terminate any Material Contract, or cancel,
modify or waive any debts or claims held by it under, or waive
any rights in connection with, any Material Contract, or enter
into any contract or other agreement of any type, whether
written or oral, that would have been a Material Contract had it
been entered into prior to this Agreement;
(f) do or permit any of its subsidiaries, investments
managers or advisers, or Agents or Administrators to do any of
the following: (i) fail to comply with the Investment
Policy, or amend, modify or otherwise change the Investment
Policy in any material respect, except as may be required by
(or, in its reasonable good faith judgment, advisable under)
GAAP, Applicable SAP or any Governmental Entity or applicable
Laws, (ii) enter into, purchase, sell, amend or modify any
derivative other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and its Investment Policy or
(iii) voluntarily forfeit, abandon, modify, waive,
terminate or otherwise change any of its material Permits;
(g) take any action with the actual knowledge and intent
that it would result in any of the conditions to the
Amalgamation set forth in ARTICLE VI not being satisfied or
take any action that would materially adversely affect the
ability of the parties to obtain any of the Requisite Regulatory
Approvals
A-24
(as defined in Section 6.1(c)) without imposition of a
condition or restriction of the type referred to in
Section 6.2(d) or Section 6.3(d), as the case may be);
(h) (i) except as disclosed in any of its SEC
Documents filed prior to the date of this Agreement, change its
methods of accounting in effect at December 31, 2008,
except as required by changes in applicable Laws, GAAP or
Applicable SAP as concurred to by its independent auditors,
(ii) make, change or revoke any material Tax election, file
any amended Tax Return, settle any Tax claim, audit, action,
suit, proceeding, examination or investigation or change its
method of tax accounting (except, with respect to any amended
Tax Return or any change in tax accounting method, as required
by changes in applicable Law (or any Taxing Authoritys
interpretation thereof)), in each case, if such action would
have the effect of increasing any of its Tax liabilities by an
amount that is material or (iii) alter or amend in any
material respect its Investment Policy or any existing
underwriting, claim handling, loss control, investment,
actuarial or financial reporting practices, methods, guidelines
or policies or any material assumption underlying an actuarial
policy or practice (including compliance policies), except as
may be required by (or, in its reasonable good faith judgment,
advisable under) GAAP, Applicable SAP or any Governmental Entity
or applicable Laws;
(i) adopt any plan of complete or partial liquidation or
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;
(j) settle or compromise any Legal Proceedings other than
settlements or compromises of Legal Proceedings (i) where
the amount paid (less the amount reserved for such matters by it
in the latest audited balance sheet included in its SEC
Documents and any insurance coverage applicable thereto) in
settlement or compromise, in each case, does not exceed
$1,000,000 and such settlement or compromise only involves
monetary
and/or
disclosure-based relief or (ii) arising from ordinary
course claims for insurance under contracts of insurance or
reinsurance issued by one of its subsidiaries;
(k) with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries only,
(i) enter into, adopt, amend or terminate any IPC Benefit
Plan, as the case may be, or any other employee benefit plan or
any agreement, arrangement, plan or policy between it or one of
its subsidiaries and one or more of its employees, directors or
officers other than as required by this Agreement or in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
(ii) except as required by any IPC Benefit Plan, as the
case may be, as in effect as of the date hereof, increase in any
manner the compensation or fringe benefits of any director,
officer, employee, independent contractor or consultant or pay
any benefit not required by any IPC Benefit Plan, as the case
may be, as in effect as of the date hereof or enter into any
contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement to do any of the
foregoing, except for normal payments, awards and increases to
employees who are not directors or officers in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, or
(iii) enter into or renew any contract, agreement,
commitment or arrangement (other than a renewal occurring in
accordance with the terms of a IPC Benefit Plan, as the case may
be) providing for the payment to any director, officer,
employee, independent contractor or consultant of compensation
or benefits contingent, or the terms of which are materially
altered, upon the occurrence of any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement;
(l) incur, create or assume any indebtedness for borrowed
money (or modify any of the material terms of any such
outstanding indebtedness), including by way of an intercompany
loan to it, guarantee any such indebtedness or issue or sell any
debt securities or warrants or rights to acquire any debt
securities of it or any of its subsidiaries or guarantee any
debt securities of others, other than (i) in replacement of
existing or maturing debt, (ii) in connection with amending
existing indebtedness agreements in connection with the
Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
(iii) in the ordinary course of the insurance or
reinsurance business and (iv) draw-downs pursuant to
existing credit facilities and letters of credit;
(m) grant, extend, amend, waive or modify any material
rights in or to, nor sell, assign, lease, transfer, license, let
lapse, abandon, cancel or otherwise dispose of, any material
Intellectual Property rights (except, in the case of Validus and
its subsidiaries, in connection with a transaction of the type
described in Section 4.1(d));
A-25
(n) with respect to Validus and its subsidiaries only,
enter into, adopt, amend or terminate any Validus Benefit Plan,
as the case may be, or any other employee benefit plan or any
agreement, arrangement, plan or policy between it or one of its
subsidiaries and one or more of its employees, directors or
officers, except, in any case, as will not result in a payment
to any employee, director or officer of compensation or benefits
in a material amount contingent, or the terms of which are
materially altered, upon the occurrence of any of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; or
(o) agree to, or make any commitment to, take, or
authorize, any of the actions prohibited by this
Section 4.1.
4.2 Financing. In the event that
Validus determines in its reasonable discretion that it is
desirable to obtain new credit facilities
and/or amend
or obtain waivers under any of the parties existing credit
facilities (any such new
and/or
amended or waived credit facilities, Replacement
Financing) in connection with the Amalgamation and the
other transactions contemplated hereby, then the parties shall,
and shall cause each of their respective subsidiaries to, use
commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other and
to cause their respective directors, officers, employees, agents
and representatives to cooperate in connection with the
arrangement and consummation of Replacement Financing, including
with respect to the giving (effective as of the Effective Time)
of any mutually acceptable guarantees required by the lenders in
connection therewith and, in the case of IPC, taking such
actions as are reasonably requested by Validus; provided
that (i) such requested cooperation does not unreasonably
interfere with the ongoing operations of a party and its
subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time, (ii) no party or
any of its subsidiaries shall be required to incur any liability
under Replacement Financing prior to the Effective Time unless
contingent upon the occurrence of the Closing and not material
to Validus and its subsidiaries (after giving effect to the
Amalgamation), and (iii) IPC and Validus shall be
responsible for their respective costs and expenses incurred in
connection with such cooperation. For the avoidance of doubt, no
failure of Validus to obtain Replacement Financing shall be
deemed in and of itself to be a failure of the conditions set
forth in Article VI of this Agreement, including
Section 6.2(f) or Section 6.3(f) of this Agreement.
4.3 Bermuda Required
Actions. Prior to the Closing, (a) IPC
shall (i) procure that the statutory declaration required
by Section 108(3) of the Companies Act is duly sworn by one
of its officers; (ii) prepare a duly certified copy of
the IPC shareholder resolutions evidencing the Required IPC Vote
and deliver such documents to Validus; and (b)
Amalgamation Sub shall (and Validus, as the sole shareholder of
Amalgamation Sub shall cause Amalgamation Sub to) (i)
procure that the statutory declarations required by
Section 108(3) of the Companies Act is duly sworn by one of
Amalgamation Subs officers; (ii) prepare a duly
certified copy of the shareholder resolutions evidencing the
approval of Validus, as the sole shareholder of the Amalgamation
Sub, of the Amalgamation; and (iii) prepare a notice
advising the Registrar of the registered office of the
Amalgamated Company.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL
AGREEMENTS
5.1 Preparation of Joint Proxy/Prospectus;
Shareholders Meetings.
(a) As promptly as reasonably practicable following the
date hereof, IPC and Validus shall cooperate in preparing and
shall cause to be filed with the SEC a mutually acceptable joint
proxy statement/prospectus relating to the matters to be
submitted to the shareholders of Validus at the Validus
Shareholders Meeting and to the shareholders of IPC at the IPC
Shareholders Meeting (such joint proxy statement/prospectus, and
any amendments or supplements thereto, the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus), and Validus shall prepare, together
with IPC, and file with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-4
(of which the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall form a
part) with respect to the issuance of Validus Common Shares in
the Amalgamation (such
Form S-4,
and any amendments or supplements thereto, the
Form S-4).
Each of IPC and Validus shall take all actions reasonably
necessary to prepare and file the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus
A-26
and the
Form S-4
no later than 30 days following the date of this Agreement.
In addition, each of IPC and Validus shall:
(i) use commercially reasonable efforts to respond to
comments received from the SEC on the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and to have the
Form S-4
declared effective by the SEC, to keep the
Form S-4
effective as long as is necessary to consummate the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, and to mail the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus to their respective
shareholders as promptly as practicable after the
Form S-4
is declared effective. IPC and Validus shall, on the same day of
receipt thereof (and if not possible, as promptly as practicable
after receipt thereof), provide the other party with copies of
any written comments and advise the other party of any oral
comments with respect to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or
the
Form S-4
received from the SEC on or after the date of this Agreement;
(ii) cooperate and provide the other party with a
reasonable opportunity to review and comment on any amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
prior to filing such with the SEC with respect to the filings
made on or after the date of this Agreement, and each party will
provide the other party with a copy of all such filings made
with the SEC. None of the information supplied or to be supplied
by Validus or IPC for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
the
(A) Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading,
and (B) the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus will, at the
date of mailing to shareholders and at the times of the meetings
of shareholders to be held in connection with the Amalgamation,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
provided that, in each case of (A) and (B), neither party
shall be responsible or liable for any statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by the other party for inclusion or incorporation by reference
therein;
(iii) cause the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
to comply as to form in all material respects with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act, as the
case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
thereunder, except that no representation or warranty shall be
made by either such party with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by the other party for inclusion or incorporation by reference
in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the
Form S-4.
IPC and Validus shall make any necessary filings with respect to
the Amalgamation under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder;
(iv) use commercially reasonable efforts to take any action
required to be taken under any applicable securities Laws in
connection with the Amalgamation and each party shall furnish
all information concerning it and the holders of its capital
stock as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such
action;
(v) advise the other party, promptly after it receives
notice thereof, of the time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, the issuance of any stop order, the
suspension of the qualification of the Validus Common Shares
issuable in connection with the Amalgamation for offering or
sale in any jurisdiction, or any request by the SEC for
amendment of the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the
Form S-4; and
(vi) promptly notify the other party if at any time prior
to the Effective Time it discovers any information relating to
either of the parties, or their respective affiliates, officers
or directors, which should be set forth in an amendment or
supplement to either the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the
Form S-4
so that such documents would not include any misstatement of a
material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary to
make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading, and an appropriate
amendment or supplement describing such information shall be
promptly filed with the SEC and disseminated to the shareholders
of Validus and IPC, to the extent required by Law.
A-27
(b) Validus shall take all action necessary to call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its shareholders as
promptly as practicable for the purpose of obtaining the
Required Validus Vote (the Validus Shareholders
Meeting), and in any event within 45 days,
following the date upon which the
Form S-4
becomes effective. Subject to Section 5.4, (i) Validus
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit and secure
the Required Validus Vote in accordance with applicable legal
requirements and (ii) the board of directors of Validus
shall include the Validus Recommendation in the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
(c) IPC shall take all action necessary to call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its shareholders as
promptly as practicable for the purpose of obtaining the
Required IPC Vote (the IPC Shareholders
Meeting), and in any event within 45 days,
following the date upon which the
Form S-4
becomes effective. Subject to Section 5.4, (i) IPC
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit and secure
the Required IPC Vote in accordance with applicable legal
requirements and (ii) the board of directors of IPC shall
include the IPC Recommendation in the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
(d) Validus and IPC shall coordinate and each shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Validus
Shareholders Meeting and the IPC Shareholders Meeting to be held
on the same date.
(e) Validus and IPC may determine, after consultation with
each other, that Validus shall file a proxy statement for the
Validus Shareholders Meeting and Validus and IPC shall file a
combined proxy statement/prospectus for the IPC Shareholders
Meeting rather than the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, in
which case each of the references in this Agreement to the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall refer to the proxy statement
for the Validus Shareholders Meeting and the combined
proxy/statement prospectus for the IPC Shareholders Meeting
which all necessary changes being made.
5.2 Access to Information; Confidentiality.
(a) Upon reasonable notice, each of Validus and IPC shall
(and shall cause each of its subsidiaries to) (i) afford
to the officers, employees, accountants, counsel, financial
advisors and other representatives of the other party, access,
during normal business hours during the period prior to the
Effective Time, to all its properties, books, contracts, records
and officers and (ii) during such period, make available
all other information concerning its business, properties and
personnel, in each case, as such other party may reasonably
request. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.2 or
Section 5.3 to the contrary, neither party nor any of its
subsidiaries shall be required to provide access to or to
disclose information where such access or disclosure would
jeopardize any legally recognized privilege applicable to such
information or violate or contravene any applicable Laws or
binding agreement entered into prior to the date of this
Agreement (including any Laws relating to privacy). The parties
will make appropriate substitute disclosure arrangements under
circumstances in which the restrictions of the preceding
sentence apply, including adopting additional specific
procedures to protect the confidentiality of certain sensitive
material and to ensure compliance with applicable Law, and, if
necessary, restricting review of certain sensitive material to
the receiving partys financial advisors or outside legal
counsel. No information or knowledge obtained in any
investigation pursuant to this Section 5.2 shall affect or
be deemed to modify any representation or warranty made by any
party hereunder.
(b) The parties will hold any such information in
confidence to the extent required by, and in accordance with,
the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement, dated
June 14, 2009, between Validus and IPC (the
Confidentiality Agreement), which
Confidentiality Agreement will remain in full force and effect
as provided under Section 8.5 up to and until the Closing.
The parties also agree that the Confidentiality Agreement shall
terminate immediately upon the Closing.
5.3 Commercially Reasonable Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each party will cooperate and consult with the other party with
respect to, and will use its commercially reasonable efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to
be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under this
Agreement and applicable Laws to consummate the Amalgamation and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement as
promptly as practicable after the date hereof, including
preparing and filing as promptly as practicable all
documentation to effect all necessary applications, notices,
filings and other documents and to obtain as promptly as
practicable all Requisite Regulatory Approvals and all other
consents, waivers, licenses,
A-28
registrations, orders, approvals, permits, rulings, requests,
authorizations and clearances necessary or advisable to be
obtained from any third party or any Governmental Entity in
order to consummate the Amalgamation or any of the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. In furtherance and
not in limitation of the foregoing, each party will use its
commercially reasonable efforts to obtain all amendments or
waivers under Validus credit facilities listed on
Section 6.3(f) of the Validus Disclosure Letter, in each
case to the extent necessary to permit the Amalgamation and the
other transactions contemplated hereby and as promptly as
practicable following the execution of this Agreement;
provided that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in
this Section 5.3(a) and subject to Section 4.2,
Validus may cause the parties to seek and obtain Replacement
Financing for one or more of IPCs or Validus credit
facilities (the Existing Facilities).
(b) In furtherance and not in limitation of
Section 5.3(a), to the extent permissible under applicable
Laws, each party shall, in connection with the above referenced
efforts to obtain all Requisite Regulatory Approvals and any
other requisite approvals, clearances and authorizations for the
transactions contemplated hereby under applicable Laws or any
approval of a Governmental Entity, use its commercially
reasonable efforts to (i) supply as promptly as
practicable any additional information and documentary material
that may be requested pursuant to applicable Laws or by any
Governmental Entity and to use commercially reasonable efforts
to cause the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting
periods and the receipt of all such consents, waivers, licenses,
registrations, orders, approvals, permits, rulings, requests,
authorizations and clearances under applicable Laws or from such
Governmental Entities as soon as practicable, (ii)
cooperate in all respects with the other party in connection
with any filing or submission and in connection with any
investigation or other inquiry, including any proceeding
initiated by any private party, (iii) keep the other
party apprised of the status of matters relating to completion
of the transactions contemplated hereby and promptly inform the
other party of (and upon reasonable request provide copies of)
any communication received by such party from, or given by such
party to, any Governmental Entity and of any material
communication received or given in connection with any
proceeding by any private party, in each case regarding any
other transactions contemplated hereby, (iv) permit the
other parties, or the other parties legal counsel, to
review prior to its submission any communication given by it to
any Governmental Entity or, in connection with any proceeding by
any private party, with any other person, (v) consult
with the other party in advance of any meeting, conference,
conference call, discussion or communication with, any such
Governmental Entity or, in connection with any proceeding by any
private party, with any other person and (vi) to the
extent permitted by such Governmental Entity or other person,
give the other party the opportunity to attend and participate
in such meetings, conferences, conference calls, discussions and
communications.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, none of IPC (and its subsidiaries) or
Validus (and its subsidiaries) may, without the prior written
consent of the other party, (i) consent to, take or agree
or commit to take, any action for the purpose of obtaining the
Requisite Regulatory Approvals or (ii) consent to or agree
to any restriction or limitation for the purpose of obtaining
the Requisite Regulatory Approvals (including with respect to
divesting, selling, licensing, transferring, holding separate or
otherwise disposing of any business or assets or conducting its
(or its subsidiaries) business in any specified manner),
in each case, which would be effective prior to the Effective
Time or which would, after the Effective Time, not be immaterial
to Validus and its subsidiaries taken together (after giving
effect to the Amalgamation).
(d) In connection with and without limiting the foregoing,
Validus and IPC shall (i) take all reasonable actions
necessary to ensure that no takeover statute or similar statute
or regulation is or becomes applicable to the Amalgamation, this
Agreement, or any of the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and (ii) if any takeover statute or similar
statute or regulation becomes applicable to the Amalgamation,
this Agreement, or any other transaction contemplated by this
Agreement, use their respective commercially reasonable efforts
to ensure that the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and
otherwise to minimize the effect of such statute or regulation
on the Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(e) Subject to receipt of the Required IPC Vote, IPC shall
take such actions as are necessary to amend its bye-laws to
reflect the IPC Bye-Law Amendment.
A-29
5.4 No Change in Recommendation.
(a) The board of directors of Validus shall not withhold,
withdraw, qualify or modify (including by amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), in any
manner adverse to IPC, the Validus Recommendation, or publicly
propose to, or publicly announce that its board of directors has
resolved to take any such action (any of the foregoing, with
respect to the Validus Recommendation, a Change in
Validus Recommendation). The board of directors of IPC
shall not withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify (including by
amendment or supplement to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus), in any manner adverse to Validus, the IPC
Recommendation, or publicly propose to, or publicly announce
that its board of directors has resolved to take any such action
(any of the foregoing, with respect to the IPC Recommendation, a
Change in IPC Recommendation).
(b) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Required Validus
Vote, in the case of Validus, or the Required IPC Vote, in the
case of IPC, the board of directors of Validus or IPC, as the
case may be, may withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify (or
publicly announce that its board of directors has resolved to
take any such action) the Validus Recommendation, in the case of
Validus, or the IPC Recommendation, in the case of IPC, other
than, with respect to IPC only, in connection with an
Acquisition Proposal (as defined in Section 5.5(a)) (for
the avoidance of doubt, the conditions under which IPC may make
a Change of IPC Recommendation as a result of an Acquisition
Proposal are as set forth in Section 5.5 (it being
acknowledged that Validus is not required to comply with any
provision of Section 5.5 in order to make a Change of
Validus Recommendation that is related, directly or indirectly,
to an Acquisition Proposal in respect of Validus or any of its
subsidiaries)), if the board of directors of Validus or IPC, as
the case may be, after consultation with its outside legal
counsel and financial advisors, concludes in good faith that
such action is reasonably likely to be required in order for the
relevant directors to comply with such directors fiduciary
duties under applicable Law; provided that no Change in
Validus Recommendation or Change in IPC Recommendation, as the
case may be, may be made unless the party seeking to make such
Change in Validus Recommendation or Change in IPC
Recommendation, as the case may be, (i) has not breached
in any material respect its obligations under this
Section 5.4, and (ii) has provided a written notice
to the other party advising it of its intention to make a Change
in Validus Recommendation or a Change in IPC Recommendation, as
the case may be, and such other party does not, within five
business days following its receipt of such notice, agree to
make adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement
which obviate the need for the Change in Validus Recommendation
or the Change in IPC Recommendation, as the case may be, as
determined in good faith by the board of directors of Validus or
IPC, as the case may be, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors (provided that,
during such five business day period, the party seeking to make
such Change in Validus Recommendation or Change in IPC
Recommendation, as the case may be, shall, and shall cause its
outside legal counsel and its financial advisors to, negotiate
in good faith with the other party (to the extent the other
party desires to negotiate) with respect to any proposed
adjustments to the terms and conditions of this Agreement).
Notwithstanding the foregoing or the proviso to
Section 5.5(a), nothing contained herein or in
Section 5.5 shall be deemed to relieve either of Validus or
IPC of its obligation(s) under Section 5.1 to submit
matters to obtain the Required Validus Vote at the Validus
Shareholders Meeting or the Required IPC Vote at the IPC
Shareholders Meeting, as the case may be; provided,
however, that if the board of directors of Validus (in
the case of a Change in Validus Recommendation) or IPC (in the
case of a Change in IPC Recommendation) shall have effected a
Change in Validus Recommendation or a Change in IPC
Recommendation, as the case may be, then in submitting such
matters to the applicable shareholders meeting, the applicable
board of directors may submit such matters without
recommendation, in which event the applicable board of directors
shall communicate the basis for its lack of a recommendation to
the applicable shareholders in the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus or an appropriate amendment or supplement
thereto to the extent it determines after consultation with its
outside legal counsel, that such action is compelled by
applicable Law.
5.5 Acquisition Proposals.
(a) IPC agrees that neither it nor any of its subsidiaries
nor any of the officers and directors of it or its subsidiaries
shall, and that it shall cause (and use commercially reasonable
efforts to instruct) its and its
A-30
subsidiaries employees, agents, representatives and
advisors (including any investment banker, attorney or
accountant retained by it or any of its subsidiaries) not to,
directly or indirectly:
(i) initiate, solicit, encourage or facilitate (including
by providing information) any effort or attempt to make or
implement any proposal or offer with respect to, or a
transaction to effect, an amalgamation, merger, reorganization,
share exchange, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any
purchase or sale of 10% or more of the consolidated assets
(including stock of its subsidiaries) of it and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or any purchase or sale of, or
tender or exchange offer for, its voting securities that, if
consummated, would result in any person (or the shareholders of
such person) beneficially owning securities representing 10% or
more of its total voting power (or of the surviving entity in
such transaction) or the voting power of any of its subsidiaries
(any such proposal, offer or transaction (other than a proposal
or offer made by Validus) being hereinafter referred to as an
Acquisition Proposal);
(ii) have, participate or otherwise engage in any
discussions or negotiations with or provide any confidential
information or data to any person relating to an Acquisition
Proposal;
(iii) approve or recommend, or propose to approve or
recommend, any Acquisition Proposal or submit to the vote of its
shareholders any Acquisition Proposal prior to the termination
of this Agreement; or
(iv) approve or recommend, or propose to approve or
recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent,
agreement in principle, merger agreement, amalgamation
agreement, asset purchase or share exchange agreement, option
agreement or other similar agreement related to any Acquisition
Proposal; provided that IPC, its officers and directors,
any of its subsidiaries and any of the officers and directors of
its subsidiaries may, and IPC and its subsidiaries may cause
their respective employees, agents, representatives and advisors
(including any investment banker, attorney or accountant
retained by it or any of its subsidiaries), to, directly or
indirectly, if the board of directors of IPC, after consultation
with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, concludes
in good faith that such action is reasonably likely to be
required in order for the directors to comply with their
fiduciary duties under applicable Law and so long as IPC, its
officers and directors, its subsidiaries and its officers and
directors and their respective employees, agents,
representatives and advisors (including any investment banker,
attorney or accountant retained by it or any of its
subsidiaries) shall have complied with Section 5.5(c),
participate or otherwise engage in discussions or negotiations
with or furnish confidential information or data to persons
relating to an Acquisition Proposal; provided,
further that (A) prior to participating or otherwise
engaging in any such discussions or negotiations or furnishing
such confidential information or data IPC has entered into a
confidentiality agreement with such person on terms not less
restrictive in the aggregate to such person than the provisions
of the Confidentiality Agreement are to Validus and its
subsidiaries and their respective personnel and representatives
and (B) all such information or data has previously been
provided or made available to Validus or its representatives or
is provided or made available to Validus or its representatives
prior to or substantially concurrent with the time it is
provided to such person.
(b) IPC agrees that, subject to Section 5.5(d), it
shall, and shall cause its subsidiaries and its and their
respective officers, directors, employees, agents,
representatives and advisors to, cease immediately and terminate
any and all existing activities, discussions or negotiations
with any third parties conducted heretofore with respect to any
Acquisition Proposal, and (ii) it shall not, and shall
not permit any of its subsidiaries to, release any third party
from, or waive any provisions of, any confidentiality or
standstill agreement to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a
party with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. IPC agrees that
it shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to promptly
inform its and its subsidiaries respective directors,
officers, employees, agents, representatives and advisors of the
obligations undertaken in this Section 5.5. IPC also agrees
that it will promptly request each third party that has executed
a confidentiality agreement prior to the date of this Agreement
(other than any third party listed in Section 5.5(b) of the
IPC Disclosure Letter) in connection with such third
partys consideration of a transaction involving IPC or any
of its subsidiaries (or any portion thereof) to return or
destroy all confidential information heretofore furnished to
such third party or its representatives by or on behalf of IPC
or any of its subsidiaries.
A-31
(c) IPC shall promptly notify Validus of any
(i) Acquisition Proposal, (ii) request for information
that could reasonably be expected to be related to an
Acquisition Proposal received by it, any of its subsidiaries or
any of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives or advisors (including any investment bankers,
attorneys or accountants), and (iii) request that could
reasonably be expected to be related to an Acquisition Proposal
for discussions with or negotiations by, it, any of its
subsidiaries or any of their respective directors, officers,
employees, agents, representatives or advisors (including any
investment bankers, attorneys or accountants), indicating, in
connection with such notice, the identity of the person making
such Acquisition Proposal or request and the material terms and
conditions thereof (including a copy thereof and any related
available documentation and correspondence), and in any event
IPC shall provide written notice to Validus of any Acquisition
Proposal, request for information or request for such
discussions or negotiations within 24 hours of such event.
IPC will (A) inform the person making such Acquisition
Proposal, request for information or request for discussions or
negotiations of its obligations under this Agreement and
(B) keep Validus reasonably informed on a reasonably
current basis of the terms of any such Acquisition Proposal or
request for information or request for discussions or
negotiations (including whether such Acquisition Proposal or
request for information or request for discussions or
negotiations is withdrawn and any material change to the terms
thereof).
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, if, at any time prior to obtaining the Required IPC
Vote, the board of directors of IPC concludes that a bona fide
written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach
of this Section 5.5 could be reasonably likely to
constitute a Superior Proposal (after giving effect to all the
adjustments to this Agreement which may be offered by Validus
prior to or during the Notice Period), the board of directors of
IPC may make a Change in IPC Recommendation; provided
that the board of directors of IPC may not make a Change in IPC
Recommendation unless (i) IPC has provided a written
notice to Validus (a Notice of Superior
Proposal) advising Validus that it has received an
Acquisition Proposal that could be reasonably likely to
constitute a Superior Proposal and specifying the identity of
the person making such Acquisition Proposal and the material
terms thereof (including a copy thereof and any related
available documentation and correspondence) and (ii)
Validus does not, within five business days following its
receipt of the Notice of Superior Proposal (the Notice
Period), make an offer that, as determined in good
faith by the board of directors of IPC after consultation with
its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, results in the
applicable Acquisition Proposal no longer being a Superior
Proposal (provided that, during the Notice Period, IPC
shall, and shall cause its outside legal counsel and its
financial advisors to, negotiate in good faith with Validus (to
the extent Validus desires to negotiate) with respect to such
proposal). The parties understand and agree that to comply with
this Section 5.5(d) any revisions to the terms of such
Superior Proposal which, individually or in the aggregate, would
be material when considering such Superior Proposal in its
totality, shall require IPC to deliver to Validus a new Notice
of Superior Proposal and the commencement of a new Notice Period.
(e) Nothing contained in this Section 5.5 shall
prohibit IPC from (i) complying with
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act to the extent applicable with
regard to an Acquisition Proposal (provided that, in the
case of an Acquisition Proposal made by way of a tender offer or
exchange offer, any failure by IPC or its board of directors to
recommend that the shareholders of IPC reject such offer within
the time period specified in
Rule 14e-2(a)
shall be deemed to be a Change in IPC Recommendation), or making
any legally required disclosure to its shareholders with regard
to an Acquisition Proposal (provided that any disclosure
(other than a stop, look and listen or similar
communication of the type contemplated by
Rule 14d-9(f)
under the Exchange Act) made pursuant to
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
shall be deemed to be a Change in IPC Recommendation unless the
board of directors of IPC expressly reaffirms its recommendation
to its shareholders in favor of approval of this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby) or (ii) informing
any person of the existence of the provisions contained in this
Section 5.5.
(f) Superior
Proposal means a bona fide unsolicited
written Acquisition Proposal from any person (other than Validus
or its subsidiaries) that did not result from a breach by IPC of
this Section 5.5, which the board of directors of IPC
concludes in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and its financial advisors (taking into account
the legal, financial, regulatory, timing and other aspects of
the Acquisition Proposal and the person making the Acquisition
Proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense
A-32
reimbursement provisions and conditions to consummation)), is in
the long-term best interests of IPC including its shareholders,
employees, communities and other stakeholders, taking into
account the long-term strategic prospects and other benefits of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (i)
is more favorable to IPC, its shareholders and other
constituencies than the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement (after giving effect to all adjustments to this
Agreement which may be offered by Validus under
Section 5.5(d) in response to such Acquisition Proposal),
(ii) is fully financed or reasonably capable of being
fully financed, reasonably likely to receive all required
governmental approvals and otherwise reasonably capable of being
completed on the terms proposed and (iii) that could be
reasonably likely to require the board of directors of IPC to
make a Change in IPC Recommendation in order to comply with its
directors fiduciary duties under applicable Law;
provided that, for purposes of this definition of
Superior Proposal, the term Acquisition
Proposal shall have the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 5.5(a)(i), except that the reference to 10%
or more of its voting power or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal shall be deemed to be a reference to 50% or
more of its total voting power or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries and the reference to 10% or more of the
consolidated assets in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal shall be deemed to be a reference to all or
substantially all of the consolidated assets.
(g) The parties acknowledge and agree that Validus shall
not be subject to the terms of this Section 5.5.
5.6 Section 16 Matters. Prior
to the Effective Time, each of Validus and IPC shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be exempt under
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act any dispositions of IPC
Common Shares or acquisitions of Validus Common Shares
(including, in each case, derivative securities) resulting from
the transactions contemplated hereby by each director or officer
of IPC who is subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to IPC.
5.7 Fees and Expenses. Whether or
not the Amalgamation is consummated, all costs and expenses
incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such
expense, except as otherwise expressly provided herein, and
except that expenses incurred in connection with filing,
printing and mailing the IPC Proxy, the Prospectus and the
Form S-4
shall be shared equally by IPC and Validus.
5.8 Indemnification; Directors and
Officers Insurance.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Validus shall cause
the Amalgamated Company to, to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable Law (and, in the case of former officers and
directors, to the extent permitted by the bye-laws of IPC and
the Amalgamated Company prior to the Closing), indemnify, defend
and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, each
person who is now, or has been at any time prior to the date
hereof or who becomes prior to the Effective Time, a director or
officer of IPC (the Indemnified Parties)
against all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses,
liabilities or judgments or amounts that are paid in settlement
of or in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation based in whole or in part on or arising in whole
or in part out of the fact that such person is or was a director
or officer of IPC or any of its respective subsidiaries, and
pertaining to any matter existing or occurring, or any acts or
omissions occurring, at or prior to the Effective Time, whether
asserted or claimed prior to, at or after, the Effective Time
(including matters, acts or omissions occurring in connection
with the approval of this Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby) to the same extent such
persons are indemnified or have the right to advancement of
expenses as of the date of this Agreement by IPC or any of its
respective subsidiaries pursuant to the relevant entitys
memorandum of association, bye-laws and indemnification
agreements and resolutions, if any, in existence on the date
hereof. Except as required by applicable Law, and until such
time as the period under which a claim against any Indemnified
Party with respect to any acts or omissions by any such
Indemnified Party occurring at or prior to the Effective Time
shall have expired, Validus shall not, and shall not permit any
of its subsidiaries to, amend or eliminate the indemnification
or advancement provisions of the bye-laws of the Amalgamated
Company in any manner adverse to the Indemnified Parties.
(b) For a period of six years after the Effective Time,
Validus shall purchase as of the Effective Time, a tail policy
to the existing directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by IPC with respect to claims arising from
facts or events which occurred at or prior to the Effective
Time, and which tail policy shall
A-33
contain substantially the same coverage and amounts as, and
contain terms and conditions no less advantageous than the
coverage provided by the existing policy of IPC as of the date
of this Agreement; provided, however, that in no
event shall Validus be required to expend for the entire tail
policy, in excess of 350% of the annual premium currently
provided by IPC for its existing policy of directors and
officers liability insurance; and provided
further that, if the premium of such insurance coverage
exceeds such amount, Validus shall be obliged to obtain a policy
with the greatest coverage available for a cost not to exceed
such amount. At the request of Validus, IPC shall cooperate with
Validus to obtain such a tail policy effective as of the
Effective Time.
(c) In the event that Validus or the Amalgamated Company or
any of its successors or assigns (i) consolidates or
amalgamates with or merges into any other person and is not the
continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such
consolidation or amalgamation or (ii) transfers or conveys
all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any
person (including by dissolution), then, and in each such case,
Validus shall cause proper provision to be made so that the
successors and assigns of Validus or the Amalgamated Company
assume and honor the obligations set forth in this
Section 5.8.
(d) The provisions of Sections 5.8(a) through (c):
(i) are intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be
enforceable by, each director of IPC as of the date of this
Agreement and each other Indemnified Party, his or her heirs and
legal representatives and (ii) are in addition to, and
not in substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or
contribution that any such person may have by contract or
otherwise. Each of the directors of IPC as of the date of this
Agreement shall, at any time prior to 10 business days prior to
the Closing Date, have the right to be bound as a counterparty
solely in regard to this Section 5.8 by executing and
delivering to each of Validus, Amalgamation Sub and IPC a
counterpart signature page hereto.
(e) IPC shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain
a pro rata refund (on an annualized basis taking into account
the remaining period of the policy term) of the $1,156,000
premium paid by IPC on June 30, 2009, in connection with
the renewal of its annual directors and officers
liability insurance coverage for the period July 2009 through
July 2010.
5.9 Public Announcements. The
parties may issue separate press releases regarding the
Amalgamation following the execution of this Agreement;
provided that each party shall provide the other party
with an opportunity to review such press release in advance of
its dissemination. Thereafter, each of Validus and IPC shall,
except as may be required by applicable Law or by obligations
pursuant to any listing agreement with or rules of NASDAQ or the
NYSE, as applicable, or by request of any Governmental Entity,
consult with the other party before issuing any press release or
otherwise making any public statement with respect to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby;
provided, however, that this consultation
obligation shall not apply to any press release or other public
statement relating to any actual or contemplated litigation
between the parties to this Agreement.
5.10 Additional Agreements. In
case any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out
the purposes of this Agreement or to vest the Amalgamated
Company with full title to all properties, assets, rights,
approvals, permits, authorizations, immunities and franchises of
IPC and its subsidiaries, the parties shall use commercially
reasonable efforts to cause their respective officers and
directors to take all such necessary action.
5.11 Shareholder Litigation. IPC
shall give Validus the reasonable opportunity to participate in
the defense of any shareholder litigation against IPC or its
directors or officers relating to this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby.
5.12 Employee Benefits.
(a) [Reserved].
(b) As of the Closing Date, Validus shall, or shall cause
one of its subsidiaries to, continue to employ each person
employed by Validus or IPC or any of their respective
subsidiaries as of the Closing Date (such employees,
collectively, the Employees). Except as
expressly provided below, nothing contained herein shall
restrict Validus in the future in the exercise of its
independent, good-faith business judgment as to the terms
A-34
and conditions under which such employment shall continue, the
duration of such employment, the basis on which such employment
is terminated or the benefits provided to any Employee.
(c) For a period of not less than one year following the
Closing Date, Validus shall (or shall cause its subsidiaries to)
make available to the Employees that immediately prior to the
Closing were employed by IPC, employee benefits and compensation
opportunities (including salary, wages and bonus opportunity)
substantially comparable in the aggregate to the employee
benefits and compensation opportunities in effect for IPC
employees immediately prior to the Closing.
(d) Validus and its subsidiaries shall ensure that any
Compensation and Benefit Plan in which the Employees are
eligible to participate after the Closing Date shall take into
account for purposes of eligibility and vesting thereunder,
except for purposes of qualifying for subsidized early
retirement benefits or to the extent it would result in a
duplication of benefits, service by the Employees with IPC and
any of its subsidiaries prior to the Closing Date, to the same
extent such service was credited prior to the Closing Date under
a comparable Compensation and Benefit Plan of IPC.
(e) From and after the Closing Date, Validus shall honor
all IPC Benefit Plans, in accordance with their terms as in
effect immediately prior to the Closing Date; provided
that nothing herein shall limit the right of Validus to amend or
terminate any such plan in accordance with its terms.
(f) Prior to the Closing Date, IPC may adopt a severance
benefit plan in accordance with the terms set forth in
Section 5.12(f) of the IPC Disclosure Letter.
(g) Each of Validus and IPC acknowledges and agrees that
each Employee who holds currently outstanding Performance Share
Units shall (i) fully vest in such units on the date of
their termination of employment for any reason, except a
termination for cause (as defined in the IPC
Holdings, Ltd. 2007 Incentive Plan), provided that such
termination occurs within 12 months of the Closing Date,
and (ii) be paid out within three (3) business days
after any such termination (or, if payment at such time would
result in the Employee being subject to additional tax under
Section 409A of the Code, the payment will be delayed until
six (6) months after such termination (or earlier death or
disability within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code)).
(h) Each of Validus and IPC acknowledges and agrees that on
the Closing Date a change in control will occur
under the IPC Benefit Plans and IPC Share Plans listed on
Section 5.12(h) of the IPC Disclosure Letter.
(i) Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall
(i) be treated as an amendment of any Compensation and
Benefit Plan or (ii) give any third party any right to
enforce the provisions of this Section 5.12.
5.13 Listing and Delisting; Reservation for
Issuance. Validus shall use its commercially
reasonable efforts to cause all the following shares to be
approved for listing and quotation on the NYSE, subject to
official notice of issuance, no later than the Closing Date:
(i) all Validus Common Shares to be issued in the
Amalgamation to IPC shareholders and (ii) all Validus
Common Shares to be reserved for issuance upon exercise or
vesting of the IPC Share Options or IPC Other Awards
(collectively, the Listed Validus Common
Shares). Validus shall take all action necessary to
reserve for issuance, prior to the Closing Date, any Listed
Validus Common Shares that, by their terms and in accordance
with this Agreement, will not be issued until after the
Effective Time. Validus shall use its commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the IPC Common Shares to no longer be listed or
quoted on NASDAQ and to be deregistered under the Exchange Act
as soon as practicable following the Effective Time.
5.14 Dividends. IPC and Validus
shall coordinate the declaration, setting of record dates and
payment dates of dividends of IPC Common Shares and Validus
Common Shares so that holders of IPC Common Shares do not
receive dividends on both IPC Common Shares and the Validus
Common Shares received in the Amalgamation in respect of any
calendar quarter or fail to receive a dividend on either the IPC
Common Shares or the Validus Common Shares received in the
Amalgamation in respect of any calendar quarter. For the
avoidance of doubt, the purpose of this Section 5.14 is to
ensure that the holders of the Validus Common Shares and IPC
Common Shares each receive the same number of quarterly
dividends after execution of this
A-35
Agreement and prior to the Effective Time with respect to such
shares, subject to the proviso in Section 4.1(a)(i)
relating to the Max Termination Fee.
5.15 Tax Treatment.
(a) The parties intend the Amalgamation to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and to obtain the opinions described in
Sections 6.2(e) and 6.3(e) of this Agreement. Each of IPC,
Amalgamation Sub and Validus and each of their respective
affiliates shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause
the Amalgamation to so qualify and to obtain such opinions, and
unless otherwise required by applicable Law or by any other
provision of this Agreement, shall not take any actions, or
cause any actions to be taken, which would reasonably be
expected to cause the Amalgamation to fail so to qualify or the
opinions to fail to be delivered.
(b) Validus shall cause (i) Amalgamation Sub to file
with the United States Internal Revenue Service a properly
completed Form 8832, so as to elect to be treated as a
disregarded entity for U.S. federal tax purposes effective
at least one day prior to the Closing Date, and (ii) the
Amalgamated Company to file, after the Closing Date, with the
United States Internal Revenue Service a properly completed
Form 8832, so as to cause it to be treated for
U.S. federal tax purposes as a disregarded entity effective
as of the Closing Date.
5.16 Max Termination
Fee. Following the execution and delivery of
this Agreement, IPC shall pay to Max $50,000,000 in respect of
the Max Termination Fee and Validus shall pay to IPC $50,000,000
(the Reimbursement Amount) in respect of, and
in reliance upon, such payment.
5.17 Validus Proposals. Without
the consent of the board of directors of IPC, which consent
shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed,
Validus shall not make or announce any proposal during the term
of this Agreement to acquire IPC and shall (a) as soon as
reasonably practicable, withdraw or terminate its Tender Offer
Statement on Schedule TO and the related registration
statement on
Form S-4
and all other documents related thereto filed with the SEC by
Validus prior to the date hereof and (b) shall terminate
all solicitation efforts with respect to its proxy statements on
Schedule 14A relating to the requisition of a special
general meeting of IPC and the scheme of arrangement proposed by
Validus and all other documents related thereto filed with the
SEC by Validus prior to the date hereof; provided that
notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing,
nothing in this Section 5.17 shall prevent, impede or delay
Validus, any of its subsidiaries or any of their respective
directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives or
advisors (including any investment bankers, attorneys or
accountants) from (i) continuing, amending or consummating
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including
pursuant to Section 5.5(d)) or (ii) responding to, or
commenting on, any Acquisition Proposal, including through an
exchange offer or scheme of arrangement.
5.18 Certain Max Litigation.
(a) Neither IPC nor any of its subsidiaries shall, without
Validus prior written consent (which shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), commence any proceedings
against Max in relation to such rights (if any) as IPC may have
to pursue a claim for recovery of the Max Termination Fee from
Max (the IPC Claims).
(b) In the event that IPC or any of its subsidiaries or any
of their respective officers, directors, employees, agents,
representatives or advisors (including any investment banker,
attorney or accountant retained by IPC or any of IPCs
subsidiaries) proposes to, or is requested or required to,
engage or participate in settlement discussions (or similar
discussions or exchanges of information) with Max or Maxs
representatives in connection with the IPC Claims, IPC shall
promptly inform Validus in writing as soon as reasonably
practicable and in any event at least three business days prior
to the commencement of any such discussions. Subject to
applicable Law, neither IPC nor any of its subsidiaries shall,
without Validus prior written consent (which shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), settle or compromise the IPC
Claims.
5.19 Requisitioned Meeting. The
parties agree that on or before July 20, 2009, the IPC
board of directors will call the special general meeting of IPC
previously requisitioned by Validus, to occur on
December 31, 2009, with a record date of July 20,
2009, and IPC will cause notice of such meeting to be mailed to
shareholders of IPC on or before July 20, 2009, and IPC
will reasonably consult with Validus on the
A-36
form and content of such notice. The parties further agree that
neither party shall directly, or indirectly through others,
engage in any solicitation (as such term is defined in
Rule 14a-1
under the Exchange Act), or otherwise solicit shareholders of
IPC to vote, with respect to such special general meeting.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
6.1 Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to
Effect the Amalgamation. The respective
obligation of each party to effect the Amalgamation shall be
subject to the satisfaction prior to the Closing of the
following conditions, unless waived by both IPC and Validus:
(a) Shareholder Approval. Validus
shall have obtained the Required Validus Vote and IPC shall have
obtained the Required IPC Vote.
(b) NYSE Listing. The Listed
Validus Common Shares shall have been authorized for listing on
NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
(c) Requisite Regulatory
Approvals. The authorizations, consents,
orders or approvals of, or declarations or filings with, and the
expirations of waiting periods required from, any Governmental
Entity set forth in Section 6.1(c) of the Validus
Disclosure Letter and Section 6.1(c) of the IPC Disclosure
Letter, to the extent required, shall have been filed, have
occurred or been obtained (all such permits, approvals, filings
and consents and the lapse of all such waiting periods being
referred to as the Requisite Regulatory
Approvals).
(d) Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall
not be the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a
stop order.
(e) No Injunctions or Restraints;
Illegality. No temporary restraining order,
preliminary or permanent injunction or other order issued by any
court of competent jurisdiction preventing the consummation of
the Amalgamation shall be in effect. There shall not be any
action taken, or any Law enacted, entered, enforced or made
applicable to the Amalgamation, by any Governmental Entity of
competent jurisdiction that makes the consummation of the
Amalgamation illegal or otherwise restrains, enjoins or
prohibits the Amalgamation.
6.2 Conditions to Obligation of
IPC. The obligation of IPC to effect the
Amalgamation is subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions unless waived by IPC:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. (i) The representations
and warranties of Validus set forth in Section 3.8 shall be
true and correct in all respects as of the date hereof and the
Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date,
(ii) the representations and warranties of Validus (and
Amalgamation Sub, as applicable) set forth in Sections 3.2,
3.3(a), 3.9(b) (other than in the case of a Change in Validus
Recommendation pursuant to Section 5.4(b)), 3.10(a) and
3.22 shall be true and correct in all material respects as of
the date hereof and the Closing Date as though made on and as of
the Closing Date (except for such representations and warranties
made only as of a specified date, which shall be true and
correct in all material respects as of such date) and
(iii) each of the other representations and warranties of
Validus set forth in ARTICLE III of this Agreement shall be
true and correct in all respects as of the date hereof and the
Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date
(except for such representations and warranties made only as of
a specified date, which shall be true and correct as of such
date), except where the failure of any such representations and
warranties to be true and correct (without giving effect to any
materiality or Material Adverse Effect
or similar qualifier set forth therein) has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Validus.
(b) Performance of Obligations of
Validus. Validus shall have performed or
complied in all respects with all agreements and covenants
required to be performed by it under this Agreement at or prior
to the Closing Date that are qualified as to materiality or
Material Adverse Effect, and shall have
A-37
performed or complied in all material respects with all other
obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement
at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Certification. IPC shall have
received a certificate signed on behalf of Validus by the Chief
Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of Validus,
certifying that the conditions set forth in Section 6.2(a)
and Section 6.2(b) have been satisfied.
(d) Burdensome Regulatory
Condition. There shall not be any action
taken, or any Law enacted, entered, enforced or deemed
applicable to the Amalgamation or the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement by any Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction (including any Requisite Regulatory Approvals),
which imposes any term, condition, obligation or restriction
upon Validus, the Amalgamated Company or their respective
subsidiaries that would, individually or in the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Validus and its subsidiaries (including the Amalgamated Company
and its subsidiaries) on a consolidated basis after the
Effective Time.
(e) Opinion of Tax Counsel. IPC
shall have received an opinion from Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP, special counsel to IPC, dated the Closing Date, to
the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations and
assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, (i)
the Amalgamation will be treated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of IPC and
Validus will be a party to that reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code and (iii)
Validus will be treated, in respect of any shareholder who will
own after the Amalgamation less than five percent of the issued
Validus Common Shares (as determined under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.367(a)-3(b)(1)(i)),
as a corporation under Section 367(a) of the Code with
respect to each transfer of property thereto pursuant to the
Amalgamation. In rendering its opinion, Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP may require and rely upon representations contained
in letters from each of IPC and Validus.
(f) Credit Facility Waivers. All
amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities
listed on Section 6.3(f) of the Validus Disclosure Letter
as reasonably determined by IPC to be necessary to consummate
the Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
shall be in full force and effect, or Replacement Financing
shall be in full force and effect.
6.3 Conditions to Obligation of
Validus. The obligation of Validus to effect
the Amalgamation is subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions unless waived by Validus:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. (i) The representations and
warranties of IPC set forth in Section 3.8 shall be true
and correct in all respects as of the date hereof and the
Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date,
(ii) the representations and warranties of IPC set forth
in Sections 3.2, 3.3(a), 3.9(a) (other than in the case of
a Change in IPC Recommendation pursuant to Section 5.4(b)
or Section 5.5(d)), 3.10(b) and 3.22 shall be true and
correct in all material respects as of the date hereof and the
Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date
(except for such representations and warranties made only as of
a specified date, which shall be true and correct in all
material respects as of such date) and (iii) each of the
other representations and warranties of IPC set forth in
ARTICLE III of this Agreement shall be true and correct in
all respects as of the date hereof and the Closing Date as
though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for such
representations and warranties made only as of a specified date,
which shall be true and correct as of such date), except where
the failure of any such representations and warranties to be
true and correct (without giving effect to any
materiality or Material Adverse Effect
or similar qualifier set forth therein) has not had, and would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on IPC.
(b) Performance of Obligations of
IPC. IPC shall have performed or complied in
all respects with all agreements and covenants required to be
performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing
Date that are qualified as to materiality or Material Adverse
Effect, and shall have performed or complied in all material
respects with all other obligations required to be performed by
it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date.
A-38
(c) Certification. Validus shall
have received a certificate signed on behalf of IPC by the Chief
Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of IPC,
certifying that the conditions set forth in Section 6.3(a)
and Section 6.3(b) have been satisfied.
(d) Burdensome Regulatory
Condition. There shall not be any action
taken, or any Law enacted, entered, enforced or deemed
applicable to the Amalgamation or the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement by any Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction (including any Requisite Regulatory Approvals),
which imposes any term, condition, obligation or restriction
upon Validus, the Amalgamated Company or their respective
subsidiaries that would, individually or the aggregate,
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Validus and its subsidiaries (including the Amalgamated Company
and its subsidiaries) on a consolidated basis after the
Effective Time.
(e) Opinion of Tax
Counsel. Validus shall have received an
opinion from Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, special
counsel to Validus, dated the Closing Date, to the effect that,
on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions set
forth or referred to in such opinion, (i) the
Amalgamation will be treated for U.S. federal income tax
purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of IPC and
Validus will be a party to that reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code and (iii)
Validus will be treated, in respect of any shareholder who will
own after the Amalgamation less than five percent of the issued
Validus Common Shares (as determined under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.367(a)-3(b)(1)(i)),
as a corporation under Section 367(a) of the Code with
respect to each transfer of property thereto pursuant to the
Amalgamation. In rendering its opinion, Cahill
Gordon & Reindel LLP may require and rely upon
representations contained in letters from each of IPC and
Validus.
(f) Credit Facility Waivers. All
amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities
listed on Section 6.3(f) of the Validus Disclosure Letter
as reasonably determined by Validus to be necessary to
consummate the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated hereby, shall be in full force and effect, or
Replacement Financing shall be in full force and effect.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
AND AMENDMENT
7.1 Termination. This Agreement
may be terminated, at any time prior to the Effective Time, by
action taken or authorized by the board of directors of the
terminating party or parties, whether before or after any
Required Shareholder Vote has been obtained only:
(a) by mutual consent of IPC, Amalgamation Sub and Validus
in a written instrument;
(b) by either IPC or Validus, upon written notice to the
other party, if a Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction
that must grant a Requisite Regulatory Approval has denied such
Requisite Regulatory Approval and such denial has become final
and nonappealable; or any Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction shall have issued an order, judgment, decision,
decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the
Amalgamation, and such order, decree, ruling or other action has
become final and nonappealable; provided that the right
to terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(b) shall
not be available to any party whose failure to comply in any
material respect with Section 5.3 or any other provision of
this Agreement has been the direct cause of, or resulted
directly in, such action;
(c) by either IPC or Validus, upon written notice to the
other party, if the Amalgamation shall not have been consummated
on or prior to January 31, 2010; provided that the
right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 7.1(c)
shall not be available to any party whose failure to comply in
any material respect with any provision of this Agreement has
been the direct cause of, or resulted directly in, the failure
of the Effective Time to occur on or prior to such date;
(d) by IPC or Validus, upon written notice to the other
party, if the board of directors of the non-terminating party
shall have (i) effected a Change in Validus
Recommendation or Change in IPC
A-39
Recommendation, as the case may be (including by amending or
supplementing the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus to effect a
Change in Validus Recommendation or Change in IPC
Recommendation, as the case may be), (ii) failed to
include the Validus Recommendation or the IPC Recommendation in
the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus in accordance with
Section 5.1(b) or Section 5.1(c), as the case may be,
or (iii) materially breached its obligations under
Section 5.5(a)(iii) or 5.5(d);
(e) by either IPC or Validus if the terminating party is
not in material breach of its obligations under this Agreement,
upon written notice to the other party, if there shall have been
a breach by the other party of any of the covenants or
agreements or any of the representations or warranties set forth
in this Agreement on the part of such other party, which breach
would, individually or in the aggregate, result in, if occurring
or continuing on the Closing Date, the failure of the conditions
set forth in Section 6.2(a), 6.2(b) or 6.2(f) or
Section 6.3(a), 6.3(b) or 6.3(f), as the case may be, and
which breach has not been cured within 45 days following
written notice thereof to the breaching party or, by its nature,
cannot be cured within such time period; or
(f) by either IPC or Validus, if the Required Validus Vote
or Required IPC Vote shall not have been obtained upon a vote
taken thereon at the duly convened Validus Shareholders Meeting
or IPC Shareholders Meeting, as the case may be, or any
adjournment or postponement thereof at which the applicable vote
was taken.
7.2 Effect of Termination.
(a) In the event of termination of this Agreement by either
Validus or IPC as provided in Section 7.1, this Agreement
shall forthwith become void, and there shall be no liability or
obligation on the part of IPC, Amalgamation Sub or Validus or
their respective officers or directors under or arising from
this Agreement, except with respect to Section 5.2(b)
(Confidentiality), Section 5.7 (Fees and Expenses),
Section 5.19 (Requisitioned Meeting); this Section 7.2
(Effect of Termination), Section 7.3 (Repayment of the
Reimbursement Amount), and ARTICLE VIII (General
Provisions), which shall survive such termination, except that
no party shall be relieved or released from any liabilities or
damages arising out of its willful breach of this Agreement
(including in the event that this Agreement is terminated by
either party pursuant to Section 7.2(e)). For the avoidance
of doubt, Section 5.17 shall not survive termination of
this Agreement.
(b) If IPC or Validus, as the case may be, terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d), then the
non-terminating party shall, as promptly as reasonably
practicable (and in any event within three business days
following such termination), pay to the terminating party, by
wire transfer of immediately available funds, an amount equal to
$16,000,000 (the Termination Fee).
(c) If either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(c), and (i) at any time on or after
June 12, 2009 and on or prior to January 31, 2010, an
Acquisition Proposal (which for the purposes of this
Section 7.2(c) shall apply to an Acquisition Proposal for
either IPC or Validus) shall have been publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the officers of a party or its board
of directors, and (ii) within 12 months of the date
of such termination of this Agreement, such party or any of its
subsidiaries enters into or consummates an Acquisition
Transaction with the person (or its affiliate) that made such
Acquisition Proposal, then such party shall pay to the other
party upon the earlier of the date of such execution or such
consummation, by wire transfer of immediately available funds,
the Termination Fee.
(d) If either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(e) and (i) at any time on or after
June 12, 2009 and on or prior to the date of such
termination an Acquisition Proposal (which for the purposes of
this Section 7.2(d) shall apply to an Acquisition Proposal
for either IPC or Validus) shall have been publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the officers of the non-terminating
party or its board of directors, and (ii) within
12 months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, the non-terminating party or any of its subsidiaries
enters into or consummates an Acquisition Transaction with the
person (or its affiliate) that made such Acquisition Proposal,
then the non-terminating party shall pay to the terminating
party upon the earlier of the date of such execution or such
consummation, by wire transfer of immediately available funds,
the Termination Fee.
A-40
(e) If IPC or Validus, as the case may be, terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) because the Required
Validus Vote has not been obtained and (i) at any time on
or after the date of this Agreement and on or prior to the date
of the Validus Shareholders Meeting, an Acquisition Proposal is
publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the officers of
Validus or Validus board of directors, and (ii)
within 12 months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, Validus or any of its subsidiaries enters into or
consummates an Acquisition Transaction with the person (or its
affiliate) that made such Acquisition Proposal, then Validus
shall pay to IPC upon the earlier of the date of such execution
or such consummation, by wire transfer of immediately available
funds, the Termination Fee.
(f) If IPC or Validus, as the case may be, terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) because the Required
IPC Vote has not been obtained and (i) at any time on or
after June 12, 2009 and on or prior to the date of the IPC
Shareholders Meeting, an Acquisition Proposal is publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to the officers of IPC or
IPCs board of directors, and (ii) within
12 months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, IPC or any of its subsidiaries enters into or
consummates an Acquisition Transaction with the person (or its
affiliate) that made such Acquisition Proposal, then IPC shall
pay to Validus upon the earlier of the date of such execution or
such consummation, by wire transfer of immediately available
funds, the Termination Fee.
7.3 Repayment of the Reimbursement Amount.
(a) IPC shall be entitled to retain the Reimbursement
Amount, less any reduction to the Max Termination Fee (the
Max Fee Reduction) determined prior to the
termination of this Agreement pursuant to any final and
nonappealable order, decree, ruling or other action of a
Governmental Entity (a Reduction
Determination) (the amount of any Max Fee Reduction
shall be paid by IPC to Validus as promptly as reasonably
practicable (and in any event within three business days
following any such termination), by wire transfer of immediately
available funds), if this Agreement is terminated:
(i) by IPC or Validus pursuant to Section 7.1(b);
(ii) by IPC pursuant to Section 7.1(d) following a
Change in Validus Recommendation;
(iii) by IPC pursuant to Section 7.1(e); or
(iv) by IPC or Validus pursuant to Section 7.1(f)
because the Required Validus Vote has not been obtained;
provided that if any Max Fee Reduction is determined by a
Reduction Determination following the termination of this
Agreement, then IPC shall pay to Validus, as promptly as
reasonably practicable, and in any event within three business
days following such Reduction Determination, by wire transfer of
immediately available funds, an amount equal to such Max Fee
Reduction.
(b) IPC shall be entitled to retain the Reimbursement
Amount, less any Max Fee Reduction determined prior to the
termination of this Agreement pursuant to a Reduction
Determination, if this Agreement is terminated by IPC or Validus
pursuant to Section 7.1(f) because the Required IPC Vote
has not been obtained (the amount of any Max Fee Reduction shall
be paid by IPC to Validus as promptly as reasonably practicable,
and in any event within three business days following any such
termination, by wire transfer of immediately available funds);
provided that in the event that following any such
termination IPC enters into or consummates an Acquisition
Transaction that would give rise to the payment of a Termination
Fee to Validus pursuant to Section 7.2(f), then IPC shall
pay to Validus the Reimbursement Amount (less any Max Fee
Reduction previously paid to Validus) by wire transfer of
immediately available funds concurrently with the payment of
such Termination Fee; provided, further that if
any Max Fee Reduction is determined by a Reduction Determination
following a termination of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(f), then IPC shall pay to Validus, as promptly
as reasonably practicable, and in any event within three
business days following such Reduction Determination, by wire
transfer of immediately available funds, an amount equal to such
Max Fee Reduction.
(c) IPC shall be entitled to retain the Reimbursement
Amount (subject to the qualifications and limitations set forth
in clauses (i) and (ii) below), less any Max Fee
Reduction determined prior to the
A-41
termination of this Agreement pursuant to any Reduction
Determination, if this Agreement is terminated by IPC or Validus
pursuant to Section 7.1(c) (the amount of any Max Fee
Reduction shall be paid by IPC to Validus as promptly as
reasonably practicable, and in any event within three business
days following any such termination, by wire transfer of
immediately available funds).
(i) In the event that prior to any such termination
pursuant to Section 7.1(c), (A) a bona fide
Acquisition Proposal for IPC
and/or its
subsidiaries that is reasonably capable of being completed on
its proposed terms shall have been publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the officers or directors of IPC at
any time on or after June 12, 2009, and such Acquisition
Proposal has not been irrevocably withdrawn or terminated prior
to October 31, 2009 (any such Acquisition Proposal, an
IPC Trigger Proposal) and (B) no bona
fide Acquisition Proposal for Validus
and/or its
subsidiaries that is reasonably capable of being completed on
its proposed terms shall have been publicly announced on or
after the date of this Agreement and prior to the date of
termination of this Agreement (any such Acquisition Proposal, a
Validus Trigger Proposal), then following
such termination, notwithstanding the general terms of this
Section 7.3(c), IPC shall pay to Validus, as promptly as
reasonably practicable, and in any event, within three business
days following such termination, by wire transfer of immediately
available funds, an amount equal to the Reimbursement Amount
(less any Max Fee Reduction previously paid to Validus);
provided, further that in the event that a
Termination Fee becomes payable by IPC to Validus pursuant to
Section 7.2(c) and IPC has not previously paid the
Reimbursement Amount to Validus pursuant to this
Section 7.3(b), then IPC shall pay the Reimbursement Amount
(less any Max Fee Reduction previously paid to Validus) to
Validus by wire transfer of immediately available funds
concurrently with the payment of such Termination Fee; and
(ii) In the event that prior to any such termination
pursuant to Section 7.1(c), both an IPC Trigger Proposal
and a Validus Trigger Proposal shall have been made, then
following such termination, notwithstanding the general terms of
this Section 7.3(c), if IPC enters into or consummates an
Acquisition Transaction that would give rise to the payment of a
Termination Fee pursuant to Section 7.2(c) (and Validus has
not, prior to the time of such event, entered into or
consummated an Acquisition Transaction that would give rise to
the payment of a Termination Fee to IPC pursuant to
Section 7.2(c)), then IPC shall pay the Reimbursement
Amount (less the amount of any Max Fee Reduction previously paid
to Validus) to Validus concurrently with the payment of such
Termination Fee; provided that in the event that Validus
thereafter enters into or consummates an Acquisition Transaction
that would give rise to the payment of a Termination Fee to IPC
pursuant to Section 7.2(c), then Validus shall repay to IPC
the Reimbursement Amount (less any Max Fee Reduction determined
prior to the termination of this Agreement pursuant to any
Reduction Determination) by wire transfer of immediately
available funds concurrently with the payment of such
Termination Fee;
provided that if in any case pursuant to this
Section 7.3(c) a Max Fee Reduction is determined following
the termination of this Agreement (or, in the case of the
proviso to clause (ii) above, the repayment by Validus to
IPC of the Reimbursement Amount), then to the extent that the
Reimbursement Amount has not previously been paid to Validus
(or, in the case of the proviso to clause (ii) above, at
the applicable time following the repayment by Validus to IPC of
the Reimbursement Amount), IPC shall pay to Validus, as promptly
as reasonably practicable, and in any event within three
business days following such Reduction Determination, by wire
transfer of immediately available funds, an amount equal to the
amount of the Max Fee Reduction.
(d) In the event that this Agreement is terminated for any
reason other than as specified in Section 7.3(a),
Section 7.3(b) or Section 7.3(c), then IPC shall pay
to Validus, as promptly as reasonably practicable, and in any
event within three business days following such termination, by
wire transfer of immediately available funds, an amount equal to
the Reimbursement Amount.
A-42
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
8.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and
Agreements. Except for Section 5.8 and
any provision of this ARTICLE VIII to the extent it is
related to a claim under Section 5.8, none of the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in this
Agreement or in any instrument delivered pursuant to this
Agreement, including any rights arising out of any breach of
such representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements,
shall survive the Effective Time, except for those covenants and
agreements contained herein and therein that by their terms
apply or are to be performed in whole or in part after the
Effective Time.
8.2 Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed
duly given (a) on the date of delivery if delivered
personally, or by email, telecopy or facsimile, upon
confirmation of receipt, (b) on the first business day
following the date of dispatch if delivered by a recognized
next-day
courier service, or (c) on the third business day
following the date of mailing if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. All
notices hereunder shall be delivered as set forth below or
pursuant to such other instructions as may be designated in
writing by the party to receive such notice.
(a) If to IPC, to
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke HM 08
Bermuda
Attention: John R. Weale
Facsimile: +1
(441) 292-8085
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
Attention: Andrew S. Rowen, Esq.
Melissa
Sawyer, Esq.
Facsimile: +1
(212) 558-3588
(b) If to Validus, to
Validus Holdings Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton, HM 11
Bermuda
Attention: C. Jerome Dill
Joseph
E. (Jeff) Consolino
Facsimile: +1
(441) 278-9000
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
80 Pine Street
New York, NY 10005
Attention: John Schuster, Esq.
Facsimile: +1
(212) 701-3000
A-43
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Four Times Square
New York, NY 10036
Attention: Stephen F. Arcano, Esq.
Todd
E. Freed, Esq.
Facsimile: +1
(212) 735-2000
8.3 Interpretation. When a
reference is made in this Agreement to sections or subsections,
such reference shall be to a section or subsection of this
Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of contents and
headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes
only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words herein,
hereof, hereunder and words of similar
import shall be deemed to refer to this Agreement as a whole,
including the schedules and exhibits hereto, and not to any
particular provision of this Agreement. Any pronoun shall
include the corresponding masculine, feminine and neuter forms.
References to party or parties in this
Agreement mean IPC, Amalgamation Sub
and/or
Validus, as the case may be. References to person in
this Agreement mean an individual, a company, a corporation, a
limited liability company, a partnership, an association, a
trust or any other entity or organization, including a
government or political subdivision or any agency or
instrumentality thereof. References to subsidiary in
this Agreement means, as to any person, any other person of
which more than 50% of the effective voting power or equity or
other ownership interests is directly or indirectly owned by
such person. References to affiliate in this
Agreement means, as to any person, any other person which,
directly or indirectly, controls, or is controlled by, or is
under common control with, such person. As used in this
Agreement, control (including, with its correlative
meanings, controlled by and under common
control with) means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of
management or policies of a person, whether through the
ownership of securities or partnership or other ownership
interests, by contract or otherwise. As used in this Agreement,
knowledge means the actual knowledge, without due
inquiry, of the officers of Validus set forth in
Section 8.3 of the Validus Disclosure Letter or the
officers of IPC set forth in Section 8.3 of the IPC
Disclosure Letter, as the case may be. References to US
dollar, dollars, US$ or
$ in this Agreement are to the lawful currency of
the United States of America. As used in this Agreement,
business day means any day other than a Saturday,
Sunday or other day on which banking institutions in New York or
Bermuda are obligated by Law or executive order to be closed.
8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in separate counterparts, each of which shall be
considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective
when each of the parties has delivered a signed counterpart to
the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not
sign the same counterpart. Such counterpart executions may be
transmitted to the parties by facsimile or electronic
transmission, which shall have the full force and effect of an
original signature.
8.5 Entire Agreement; No Third Party
Beneficiaries. This Agreement (including the
Amalgamation Agreement, the IPC Bye-Law Amendment, the Validus
Disclosure Letter and the IPC Disclosure Letter)
(a) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all
prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof,
other than the Confidentiality Agreement, which shall survive
the execution and delivery of this Agreement and shall terminate
in accordance with its terms, or if the Closing occurs, as set
forth in Section 5.2(b), and (b) is not intended to
confer upon any person other than the parties any rights or
remedies hereunder, except (i) for the rights of the
holders of IPC Common Shares to receive the Consideration
pursuant to and subject to this Agreement if the Effective Time
occurs, and (ii) as provided in Section 5.8(e).
8.6 Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed in all respects, including as to validity,
interpretation and effect, by the Laws of Bermuda, without
giving effect to its principles or rules of conflict of laws.
A-44
8.7 Severability. Any term or
provision of this Agreement which is invalid or unenforceable in
any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective
to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability and, unless
the effect of such invalidity or unenforceability would prevent
the parties from realizing the major portion of the economic
benefits of the Amalgamation that they currently anticipate
obtaining therefrom, shall not render invalid or unenforceable
the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement or affect
the validity or enforceability of any of the terms or provisions
of this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of
this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision
shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.
8.8 Assignment. Neither this
Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations of the
parties hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties
(whether by operation of Law or otherwise) without the prior
written consent of the other parties, which may be granted or
withheld in the sole discretion of the other parties. Any
attempt to make any such assignment without such consent shall
be null and void. Subject to the preceding sentence, this
Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and
permitted assigns.
8.9 Enforcement. The parties agree
that money damages would be both incalculable and an
insufficient remedy and that irreparable damage would occur in
the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement were not
performed in accordance with their specific terms on a timely
basis or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that,
subject to the discretion of the Chosen Court (as defined in
Section 8.10), the parties shall be entitled to an
injunction or other equitable relief to prevent breaches of this
Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions
of this Agreement in any Chosen Court, this being in addition to
any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.
8.10 Submission to
Jurisdiction. Each party irrevocably and
unconditionally consents, agrees and submits to the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Bermuda Supreme Court (and appropriate
appellate courts therefrom) (the Chosen
Courts), for the purposes of any litigation, action,
suit or other proceeding arising out of or relating to this
Agreement or any transaction contemplated hereby. Each party
agrees to commence any litigation, action, suit or proceeding
relating hereto only in the Bermuda Supreme Court, or if such
litigation, action, suit or other proceeding may not be brought
in such court for reasons of subject matter jurisdiction, in the
other appellate courts therefrom or other courts of Bermuda.
Each party irrevocably and unconditionally waives any objection
to the laying of venue of any litigation, action, suit or
proceeding arising out of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby in the Chosen Courts, and hereby further
irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead
or claim in any such court that any such action, suit or
proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum. Each party further irrevocably consents to
and grants any such court jurisdiction over the person of such
parties and, to the extent legally effective, over the subject
matter of any such dispute and agrees that mailing of process or
other papers in connection with any such action or proceeding in
the manner provided in Section 8.2 or in such other manner
as may be permitted by Law, shall be valid and sufficient
service thereof. The parties agree that a final judgment in any
such suit, action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be
enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in
any other manner provided by Law.
8.11 Amendment. This Agreement is
intended to have effect as a deed, and shall be executed and
delivered as a deed. This Agreement may be amended by the
parties, by action taken or authorized by their respective
Boards of Directors, at any time before or after approval of the
matters presented in connection with the Amalgamation by the
shareholders of Validus or of IPC, but, after any such approval,
no amendment shall be made which by Law requires further
approval by such shareholders without such further approval.
This Agreement may not be amended except by a deed signed on
behalf of each of the parties by their duly authorized
representatives.
8.12 Extension; Waiver. At any
time prior to the Effective Time, the parties may, to the extent
legally allowed, (i) extend the time for the performance of
any of the obligations or other acts of the other party,
(ii) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties contained herein or in any document delivered
pursuant hereto and (iii) waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained herein. Any agreement on the
part of a party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid
only if set forth in a written
A-45
instrument signed on behalf of such party. The failure of a
party to assert any of its rights under this Agreement or
otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of those rights. No
single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, power or
privilege hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise
thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy, power or
privilege. Any waiver shall be effective only in the specific
instance and for the specific purpose for which given and shall
not constitute a waiver to any subsequent or other exercise of
any right, remedy, power or privilege hereunder.
8.13 Defined Terms.
(a) For purposes of this Agreement, each of the following
terms shall have the meaning set forth below.
Acquisition Transaction means
with respect to any person, any amalgamation, merger,
reorganization, share exchange, consolidation, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or
similar transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or
any purchase or sale of 35% or more of the consolidated assets
(including stock of its subsidiaries) of it and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or any purchase or sale of, or
tender or exchange offer for, its voting securities that, if
consummated, would result in any person (or the shareholders of
such person) beneficially owning securities representing 35% or
more of its total voting power or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries.
Average Validus Share Price
means the volume weighted average price per Validus Common Share
on the NYSE (as reported by Bloomberg L.P. or, if not reported
thereby, by another authoritative source mutually agreed by the
parties) for the five consecutive trading days immediately
preceding the second trading day prior to the Closing Date. For
all purposes of this Agreement, the Average Validus Share Price
shall be calculated to the nearest one-hundredth of one cent.
Compensation and Benefit Plan
means any pension, retirement, profit-sharing, deferred
compensation, stock option, restricted stock unit, equity-based
compensation, performance units, employee stock ownership,
severance pay, vacation, retention or other bonus or incentive
plan, any other employee program or agreement, any medical,
vision, dental, or other health plan, any life insurance plan,
and any other employee benefit plan or fringe benefit plan,
whether or not tax-qualified or otherwise tax-preferred,
maintained by, sponsored in whole or in part by, or contributed
to by IPC or Validus or their subsidiaries, as the case may be,
for the benefit of their employees, former employees, retirees,
dependents, spouses, directors, independent contractors, or
other beneficiaries and under which such employees, former
employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, independent
contractors, or other beneficiaries are eligible to participate
and any employment, retention, change in control, severance,
termination, consulting or retirement agreement with their
current or former employees.
Intellectual Property means
(i) trademarks, service marks, Internet domain names,
logos, trade dress, trade names, corporate names and any and
every other form of trade identity or indicia of origin, and the
goodwill associated therewith and symbolized thereby;
(ii) inventions, discoveries and patents, and the
improvements thereto; (iii) published and unpublished
works of authorship and the copyrights therein and thereto
(including databases and other compilations of information,
computer and electronic data processing programs and software,
in both source code and object code); (iv) trade secrets,
confidential business and technical information and any other
confidential information (including ideas, research and
development, know-how, formulae, calculations, algorithms,
models, designs, processes, business methods, customer lists and
supplier lists) (Trade Secrets); (v)
all rights in data and data bases; (vi) all other
intellectual property or similar proprietary rights; and
(vii) all applications, registrations and renewals for
the foregoing.
IPC Benefit Plan means only
those Compensation and Benefit Plans maintained by, sponsored in
whole or in part by, or contributed to by IPC or its
subsidiaries for the benefit of their employees, former
employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, independent
contractors, or other beneficiaries and under which such
employees, former employees, retirees, dependents, spouses,
directors, independent contractors, or other beneficiaries are
eligible to participate or with respect to which IPC or any of
its subsidiaries has any liability.
Material Adverse Effect means,
with respect to any party, any change, state of facts,
circumstance, event or effect that is materially adverse to
(A) the financial condition, properties, assets,
liabilities, obligations
A-46
(whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise), businesses
or results of operations of such party and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, excluding any such change, state of facts,
circumstance, event or effect to the extent caused by or
resulting from:
(i) the execution, delivery and announcement of this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby,
(ii) changes in economic, market, business, regulatory or
political conditions generally in the United States or in
Bermuda or any other jurisdiction in which such party operates
or in Bermudian, U.S. or global financial markets,
(iii) changes, circumstances or events generally affecting
the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry in
the geographic areas in which such party operates,
(iv) changes, circumstances or events resulting in
liabilities under property catastrophe reinsurance, including
any effects resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado,
windstorm, terrorist act, act of war or other natural or
man-made disaster,
(v) changes in any Law,
(vi) changes in generally accepted accounting principles or
in statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the
applicable jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance
regulatory authority (GAAP and
Applicable SAP, respectively),
including accounting and financial reporting pronouncements by
the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC), the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners and the Financial
Accounting Standards Board,
(vii) any change or announcement of a potential change in
its or any of its subsidiaries credit or claims paying
rating or A.M. Best rating or the ratings of any of its or
its subsidiaries businesses or securities (provided
that this exception shall not prevent or otherwise affect a
determination that any changes, state of facts, circumstances,
events or effects underlying a change described in this
clause (vii) has resulted in, or contributed to, a Material
Adverse Effect),
(viii) a change in the trading prices or volume of such
partys capital stock (provided that this exception
shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any
changes, state of facts, circumstances, events or effects
underlying a change described in this clause (viii) has
resulted in, or contributed to, a Material Adverse Effect),
(ix) the failure to meet any revenue, earnings or other
projections, forecasts or predictions for any period ending
after the date of this Agreement (provided that this
exception shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination
that any state of facts, circumstances, events or effects
underlying a failure described in this clause (ix) has
resulted in, or contributed to, a Material Adverse Effect),
(x) the commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war
or armed hostilities,
(xi) any action or failure to act required to be taken by a
party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, or
(xii) any change, state of facts, circumstance, event or
effect in connection with (A) the Max Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby or (B) the amalgamation
offer, offer to exchange or scheme of arrangement proposed by
Validus in connection with a proposed unsolicited transaction
with IPC that, in the case of each of clauses (A) and (B),
has been publicly disclosed by IPC in a filing with the SEC made
prior to 5:30 p.m., New York City time, at least one
business day prior to the date of this Agreement,
except in the case of the foregoing clauses (ii), (iii), (v),
(vi) and (x) to the extent those changes, state of
facts, circumstances, events, or effects have a materially
disproportionate effect on such party and its subsidiaries taken
as a whole relative to other similarly situated persons in the
property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry, and/or
(B) the ability of such party to perform its obligations
under this Agreement or to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby on a timely basis.
A-47
Max Agreement means the
Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of March 1,
2009, among IPC, IPC Limited, a Bermuda exempted company, and
Max Capital Group Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company, as amended
on March 5, 2009, and as modified by the waiver letter
among the parties thereto, dated June 4, 2009.
Permitted Encumbrance means
(i) statutory liens securing payments not yet due,
(ii) such imperfections or irregularities of title,
claims, liens, charges, security interests or encumbrances as do
not affect the use of the properties or assets subject thereto
or affected thereby or otherwise impair business operations at
such properties, (iii) restrictions on transfer imposed
by Law, (iv) assets pledged or transferred to secure
reinsurance or retrocession obligations, (v)
ordinary-course securities lending and short-sale transactions,
(vi) investment securities held in the name of a nominee,
custodian or other record owner, (vii) statutory
deposits, or (viii) any failure to hold good title, in
each case, that would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
Specified Validus Shareholders
means each of Aquiline Capital Partners, LLC, Vestar Capital
Partners and New Mountain Capital, LLC.
Tax means (i) all
federal, state, local or foreign taxes, charges, fees, imposts,
levies or other assessments, including all income, gross
receipts, capital, sales, use, ad valorem, value added,
transfer, franchise, profits, inventory, capital stock, license,
withholding, payroll, employment, social security, unemployment,
excise, premium, severance, stamp, occupation, property and
estimated taxes, customs duties, fees, assessments and charges
of any kind whatsoever, (ii) all interest, penalties,
fines, additions to tax or additional amounts imposed by any
Taxing Authority in connection with any item described in clause
(i), and (iii) any transferee liability in respect of any
items described in clauses (i) or (ii) payable by
reason of contract, assumption, transferee liability, operation
of Law, Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6(a)
(or any predecessor or successor thereof of any analogous or
similar provision under Law) or otherwise.
Tax Asset means any loss, net
operating loss, net capital loss, investment tax credit, foreign
tax credit, charitable deduction, or any other credit or Tax
attribute that could be carried forward or carried back to
reduce Taxes.
Tax Return means any return, report or
statement filed or required to be filed with respect to any Tax
(including any elections, declarations, schedules or attachments
thereto, and any amendment thereof) including any information
return, claim for refund, amended return or declaration of
estimated Tax, and including, where permitted or required,
combined, consolidated or unitary returns for any group of
entities that includes IPC, Validus or any subsidiaries thereof.
Taxing Authority means the
Internal Revenue Service or any other Governmental Entity
responsible for the administration of any Tax.
Validus Benefit Plan means only
those Compensation and Benefit Plans maintained by, sponsored in
whole or in part by, or contributed to by Validus or its
subsidiaries for the benefit of their employees, former
employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, independent
contractors, or other beneficiaries and under which such
employees, former employees, retirees, dependents, spouses,
directors, independent contractors, or other beneficiaries are
eligible to participate or with respect to which Validus or any
of its subsidiaries has any liability.
A-48
(b) Each of the following terms is defined in the provision
listed opposite such term:
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
5.5(a)
|
Acquisition Transaction
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Administrator
|
|
3.12(h)
|
affiliate
|
|
8.3
|
Agent
|
|
3.12(h)
|
Agreement
|
|
Introduction
|
Amalgamated Company
|
|
1.3
|
Amalgamation
|
|
Recitals
|
Amalgamation Agreement
|
|
1.1
|
Amalgamation Application
|
|
1.1
|
Amalgamation Sub
|
|
Introduction
|
Applicable SAP
|
|
8.13(a)
(See Material Adverse Effect)
|
Average Validus Share Price
|
|
8.13(a)
|
business day
|
|
8.3
|
Cash Portion
|
|
2.2(a)
|
Certificate of Amalgamation
|
|
1.1
|
Change in IPC Recommendation
|
|
5.4(a)
|
Change in Validus Recommendation
|
|
5.4(a)
|
Chosen Courts
|
|
8.10
|
Closing
|
|
1.2
|
Closing Date
|
|
1.2
|
Code
|
|
Recitals
|
Companies Act
|
|
Recitals
|
Compensation and Benefit Plan
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
5.2(b)
|
Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)
|
control
|
|
8.3
|
Disclosure Letter
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
Dissenting Holder
|
|
2.1(c)
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
2.1(c)
|
Effective Time
|
|
1.1
|
Employees
|
|
5.12(b)
|
ERISA
|
|
3.15(e)
|
Exchange Act
|
|
3.4(a)
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
2.2(a)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
2.2(a)
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
2.1(a)
|
Existing Facilities
|
|
5.3(a)
|
Form S-4
|
|
5.1(a)
|
GAAP
|
|
8.13(a)
(See Material Adverse Effect)
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
3.3(c)
|
Greenhill
|
|
3.19
|
A-49
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Indemnified Parties
|
|
5.8(a)
|
Insurance Entities
|
|
3.12(a)
|
Insurance Laws
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Investment Assets
|
|
3.13(a)
|
Investment Policy
|
|
3.13(c)
|
IPC
|
|
Introduction
|
IPC Benefit Plan
|
|
8.13(a)
|
IPC Bye-Law Amendment
|
|
3.9(a)
|
IPC Certificate
|
|
2.1
|
IPC Claims
|
|
5.18(a)
|
IPC Common Share
|
|
2.1
|
IPC Disclosure Letter
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
IPC Non-Performance Awards
|
|
2.3(b)
|
IPC Other Awards
|
|
2.3(b)
|
IPC Recommendation
|
|
3.9(a)
|
IPC Share Option
|
|
2.3(a)
|
IPC Share Plans
|
|
3.2(a)
|
IPC Share Register
|
|
2.1
|
IPC Shareholders Meeting
|
|
5.1(c)
|
IPC Trigger Proposal
|
|
7.3(b)(i)
|
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
|
|
5.1(a)
|
JP Morgan
|
|
3.19
|
knowledge
|
|
8.3
|
Laws
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
3.6
|
Listed Validus Common Shares
|
|
5.13
|
Lloyds
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Lloyds Regulations
|
|
3.12(m)
|
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Material Contract
|
|
3.14(a)
|
Max
|
|
Recitals
|
Max Agreement
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Max Fee Reduction
|
|
7.3(a)
|
Max Termination Fee
|
|
4.1(a)
|
multiemployer plan
|
|
3.15(e)
|
New Option
|
|
2.3(a)
|
Notice of Superior Proposal
|
|
5.5(d)
|
Notice Period
|
|
5.5(d)
|
NYSE
|
|
3.3(c)
|
Option Exchange Ratio
|
|
2.3(a)
|
party; parties
|
|
8.3
|
Per Share Cash Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)
|
Per Share Common Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)
|
A-50
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Performance Share Unit
|
|
2.3(b)
|
Permits
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Permitted Encumbrance
|
|
8.13(a)
|
person
|
|
8.3
|
Policies
|
|
3.12(g)
|
Reduction Determination
|
|
7.3(a)
|
Registrar
|
|
1.1
|
Reimbursement Amount
|
|
5.16
|
Reinsurance Agreements
|
|
3.12(e)
|
Replacement Financing
|
|
4.2
|
Representatives
|
|
5.2(b)
|
Required IPC Vote
|
|
3.10(b)
|
Required Shareholder Votes
|
|
3.10(b)
|
Required Validus Vote
|
|
3.10(a)
|
Requisite Regulatory Approvals
|
|
6.1(c)
|
SEC
|
|
8.13(a)
(See Material Adverse Effect)
|
SEC Documents
|
|
3.4(a)
|
Securities Act
|
|
3.4(a)
|
Share Issuance
|
|
Recitals
|
Specified Validus Shareholders
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Statutory Statements
|
|
3.12(b)
|
subsidiary
|
|
8.3
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
5.5(f)
|
Tax
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Tax Asset
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Tax Return
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Taxing Authority
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Termination Fee
|
|
7.2(b)
|
Trade Secrets
|
|
8.13(a)
(See Intellectual Property)
|
Underwriting Model
|
|
3.17(c)
|
Validus
|
|
Introduction
|
Validus Benefit Plan
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Validus Common Share
|
|
2.1(a)
|
Validus Disclosure Letter
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
Validus Recommendation
|
|
3.9(b)
|
Validus Share Plans
|
|
3.2(a)
|
Validus Shareholders Meeting
|
|
5.1(b)
|
Validus Trigger Proposal
|
|
7.3(b)(i)
|
Voting Debt
|
|
3.2(d)
|
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
A-51
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, IPC, Amalgamation Sub and Validus have
caused this Agreement to be signed by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized, all as of the date first set forth
above.
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
Name: John Weale
Title: President & Interim CEO
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
Name: Edward J. Noonan
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
VALIDUS LTD.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
Name: Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
A-52
SIGNATURES
Solely as to Section 5.8 hereof, this Agreement is hereby
countersigned by the following directors of IPC and is directly
enforceable by each such countersignatory as provided in
Section 5.8(d) hereof:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Kenneth L. Hammond
Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Mark R. Bridges
Title: Director
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Michael J. Cascio
Title: Director
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Peter S. Christie
Title: Director
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
L. Anthony Joaquin
Title: Director
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Name:
Antony P.D. Lancaster
Title: Director
|
|
Date:
|
A-53
Annex B
DATED AS
OF
[ l ],
200[ l ]
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD. [VALIDUS]
VALIDUS LTD. [AMAL 1]
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. [AMAL 2]
AMALGAMATION AGREEMENT
THIS AMALGAMATION AGREEMENT is dated as of
[ l ],
200[ l ],
AMONG:
(1) Validus Holdings, Ltd., a company incorporated under
the laws of Bermuda having its registered office at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, Bermuda (hereinafter called
VALIDUS);
(2) Validus Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda having its registered office at 19 Par-La-Ville
Road, Hamilton, Bermuda (hereinafter called AMAL
1); and
(3) IPC Holdings, Ltd., a company also incorporated under
the laws of Bermuda having its registered office at 29 Richmond
Road, Pembroke, Bermuda (hereinafter called AMAL
2).
WHEREAS:
(A) AMAL 1 was incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda pursuant to the Companies Act, as evidenced by a
memorandum of association dated March 18, 2009, and is a
company in good standing with the laws of Bermuda;
(B) AMAL 2 was incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda pursuant to the Companies Act, as evidenced by a
memorandum of association dated May 17, 1993 and is a
company in good standing under the laws of Bermuda;
(C) AMAL 1, acting under the authority contained in
Section 104 of the Companies Act by the written consent of
its sole Member dated
[ l ],
200[ l ],
and AMAL 2, acting under the authority contained in
Section 104 of the Companies Act by a special general
meeting of its Members held on
[ l ],
200[ l ],
agreed to amalgamate upon the terms and conditions hereinafter
set out;
(D) AMAL 1 has an authorised and issued share
capital of $100.00 consisting of 100 ordinary shares having a
par value of $1.00, all of which are fully paid;
(E) AMAL 2 has an authorised and issued share
capital of
[ l ]
consisting of
[ l ]
IPC Common Shares, all of which are fully paid; and
(F) It is desired by the parties that the said amalgamation
shall be effected.
NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. In this Agreement:
Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation means the
Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of
[ l ]
June 2009, among VALIDUS, AMAL 1 and AMAL
2, as amended to the date hereof (and includes all schedules
and exhibits thereto);
Amalgamating Companies means AMAL 1
and AMAL 2, the parties hereto;
Amalgamated Company means the Company
continuing from the amalgamation of the Amalgamating Companies;
Agreement means this Amalgamation Agreement;
Amalgamation shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation;
the Companies Act means the Bermuda Companies
Act of 1981, as amended;
Consideration shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation;
Dissenting Holder shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in Section 11;
Dissenting Shares shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in Section 11;
the Effective Time shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation;
B-1
the Exchange Agent shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation;
Excluded Shares means IPC Common Shares that
are owned by VALIDUS or by any subsidiary of VALIDUS
immediately prior to the Effective Time;
IPC Certificate shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation;
IPC Common Share shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation;
IPC Share Register shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation; and
Validus Common Shares shall have the meaning
attributed to such term in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation.
2. Each of the Amalgamating Companies does hereby agree to
amalgamate, as of the Effective Time, under the provisions of
the Companies Act and to continue as the Amalgamated Company
under the terms and conditions hereinafter set out.
3. The name of the Amalgamated Company shall be
Validus Ltd. (that is, the present name of AMAL
1) and the registered office of the Amalgamated Company
shall be 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda.
4. The Amalgamated Company shall be governed by the
Memorandum of Association of AMAL 1.
5. The Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company shall, to the
extent that they are not inconsistent with this Agreement, be
the Bye-Laws of AMAL 1, until repealed, amended or
altered.
6. The Board of Directors of the Amalgamated Company (the
Board of Directors) shall initially consist
of not more than six (6) directors, and the first directors
of the Amalgamated Company shall be the persons whose names and
addresses are set out in Schedule 1, attached hereto, who shall
hold office until the first annual meeting of the Amalgamated
Company or until their successors are elected or appointed.
7. The management and supervision of the business and
affairs of the Amalgamated Company shall be under the control of
the Board of Directors from time to time subject to the
provisions of the Companies Act and the Bye-Laws of the
Amalgamated Company.
8. The Amalgamated Company shall have a minimum share
capital of US$100.00 and an authorised share capital of
US$100.00 divided into 100 shares having a par value of
US$1.00 each, having all the rights, conditions, restrictions
and limitations set out in the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated
Company.
9. Upon the issue of the Certificate of Amalgamation giving
effect to the Amalgamation, each issued and outstanding common
share of US$1.00 each in the capital of AMAL 1 held by
VALIDUS shall be converted into a common share in the
capital of the Amalgamated Company having a par value of US$1.00;
10. Upon the issue of the Certificate of Amalgamation
giving effect to the Amalgamation:
a. the holders of the IPC Common Shares (other than
Dissenting Holders and holders of Excluded Shares) shall not
receive shares in the capital of the Amalgamated Company but
shall have the right to receive the Consideration, as set forth
in Schedule 2, attached hereto;
b. each Excluded Share shall be cancelled without repayment
of the capital paid up thereon and such shares shall not be
converted into shares of the Amalgamated Company or the right to
receive the Consideration; and
B-2
c. subject to Clause 11 below, Dissenting Holders
shall be entitled to be paid the fair value of their Dissenting
Shares as appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda pursuant to
Section 106 of the Companies Act.
11. Any issued and outstanding IPC Common Shares held by a
person who did not vote in favor of the Amalgamation and who
complies with all the provisions of the Companies Act concerning
the right of holders of IPC Common Shares to require appraisal
of their IPC Common Shares pursuant to Bermuda Law (any such
holder, a Dissenting Holder, and such IPC
Common Shares, Dissenting Shares) shall not
be converted into the right to receive the Consideration, but
shall be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the
fair value thereof as appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda
under Section 106 of the Companies Act. In the event that a
Dissenting Holder fails to perfect, effectively withdraws or
otherwise waives any right to appraisal, its IPC Common Shares
shall be cancelled and converted as of the Effective Time into
the right to receive the Consideration for each such Dissenting
Share.
12. AMAL 1 and AMAL 2 agree to execute and do
all such acts, deeds and things as shall or may be necessary to
give effect to their respective undertakings pursuant to this
Agreement.
13. This Agreement shall automatically terminate upon the
termination of the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation.
14. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests
or obligations of the parties hereunder shall be assigned by any
of the parties (whether by operation of law or otherwise)
without the prior written consent of the other parties, which
may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of the other
parties. Any attempt to make any such assignment without such
consent shall be null and void. Subject to the preceding
sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the
benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
15. This Agreement may be executed in separate
counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and the same
agreement and shall become effective when each of the parties
has delivered a signed counterpart to the other parties, it
being understood that all parties need not sign the same
counterpart. Such counterpart executions may be transmitted to
the parties by facsimile or electronic transmission, which shall
have the full force and effect of an original signature.
16. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects,
including as to validity, interpretation and effect, by the laws
of Bermuda, without giving effect to its principles or rules of
conflict of laws. Each party irrevocably and unconditionally
consents, agrees and submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of
the Bermuda Supreme Court (and appropriate appellate courts
therefrom), for the purposes of any litigation, action, suit or
other proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or
any transaction contemplated hereby.
* * *
B-3
Schedule 1
Board of Directors of Amalgamated Company
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Address
|
|
C. Jerome Dill
|
|
|
19 Par-la-Ville Road
Hamilton HM 11
Bermuda
|
|
Stuart Mercer
|
|
|
19 Par-la-Ville Road
Hamilton HM 11
Bermuda
|
|
Conan Ward
|
|
|
19 Par-la-Ville Road
Hamilton HM 11
Bermuda
|
|
B-4
Schedule 2
|
|
1.
|
Share
Conversion and Cancellation Methodology
|
1.1 Subject to Clauses 10 and 11 of this Agreement, at
the Effective Time, by virtue of the amalgamation of AMAL 1
and AMAL 2 and without any action on the part of
VALIDUS, AMAL 1 or AMAL 2 or the holders of
any shares or securities thereof, pursuant to and in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation:
1.1.1 each IPC Common Share issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than Excluded
Shares and Dissenting Shares) shall be cancelled and converted
into the right to receive for each IPC Common Share
(i) 0.9727 Validus voting common shares, each having a par
value of $0.175 (each, a Validus Common
Share) (the Per Share Common
Consideration), and (ii) $7.50 in cash without
interest (the Per Share Cash Consideration)
(the Per Share Common Consideration and the Per Share Cash
Consideration, together with any cash paid in lieu of fractional
shares in accordance with Section 2.2(e) of the Agreement
and Plan of Amalgamation, the Consideration).
Upon such conversion, each IPC Common Share shall be cancelled
and each holder of IPC Common Shares registered in the IPC Share
Register or holding a valid IPC Certificate immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall thereafter cease to have any rights
with respect to such IPC Common Shares except the right to
receive the Consideration. The Consideration shall be
appropriately adjusted to reflect fully the effect of any stock
split, reverse stock split, stock dividend (including any
dividend or distribution of securities convertible into Validus
Common Shares or IPC Common Shares), reorganization,
recapitalization, reclassification or other like change with
respect to Validus Common Shares or IPC Common Shares having a
record date on or after the date hereof and prior to the
Effective Time; and
1.1.2 in consideration of the cancellation of all of the
IPC Common Shares (other than Excluded Shares and Dissenting
Shares), prior to or at the Effective Time, VALIDUS shall
deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with the Exchange Agent
the aggregate Consideration for the purpose of the Exchange
Agent complying with the exchange procedures set forth in
Section 2.2 of the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation.
* * *
B-5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been duly executed
by or on behalf of the parties hereto.
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
Name:
Title:
VALIDUS LTD.
Name:
Title:
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
Name:
Title:
B-6
Annex
C
July 8,
2009
Board of
Directors
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton, Bermuda HM 11
Members of
the Board of Directors:
We understand that Validus Holdings, Ltd. (the
Parent) proposes to enter into an Agreement and Plan
of Amalgamation (the Amalgamation Agreement) among
the Parent, IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) and
Validus Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent (the
Amalgamation Subsidiary), that would provide, among
other things, for the amalgamation (the
Amalgamation) of the Company with the Amalgamation
Subsidiary. In the proposed Amalgamation, each issued and
outstanding common share, par value $0.01 per share, of the
Company (each, a Company Common Share), other than
Company Common Shares that are owned by the Parent or any of its
subsidiaries and any Dissenting Shares (as defined in the
Amalgamation Agreement), would be canceled and converted into
the right to receive (x) 0.9727 voting common shares, par
value $0.175 per share, of the Parent (the Parent Common
Shares) and (y) $7.50 in cash, without interest ((x)
and (y), together with any cash paid in lieu of fractional
Parent Common Shares in accordance with the terms of the
Amalgamation, the Consideration). The terms and
conditions of the Amalgamation are more fully set forth in the
Amalgamation Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether, as of the date
hereof, the Consideration to be paid by the Parent pursuant to
the proposed Amalgamation is fair, from a financial point of
view, to the Parent.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
1. reviewed a draft, dated July 8, 2009, of the
Amalgamation Agreement (the Draft Amalgamation
Agreement);
2. reviewed certain publicly available financial statements
of the Company and Parent;
3. reviewed certain other publicly available business and
financial information relating to the Company and the Parent
that we deemed relevant;
4. reviewed certain information, including financial
forecasts and other financial and operating data concerning the
Parent and the Company, prepared by the management of the Parent
and the Company, respectively;
5. discussed the past and present operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Parent with senior executives
of the Parent;
6. discussed the past and present operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Company with senior
executives of the Company;
7. reviewed the historical market prices and trading
activity for the Company Common Shares and the Parent Common
Shares and analyzed their implied valuation multiples;
8. compared the value of the Consideration with that
received in certain publicly available transactions that we
deemed relevant;
9. compared the value of the Consideration with the trading
valuations of certain publicly traded companies that we deemed
relevant;
10. compared the value of the Consideration with the
relative contribution of the Company to the pro forma combined
company based on a number of metrics that we deemed relevant;
C-1
11. participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of the Parent and its legal advisors and
representatives of the Company and its legal and financial
advisors; and
12. performed such other analyses and considered such other
factors as we deemed appropriate.
In giving our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon, without
independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the
information publicly available, supplied or otherwise made
available to us by representatives and management of the Parent
and the Company for the purposes of this opinion and have
further relied upon the assurances of the representatives and
management of the Parent and the Company, as applicable, that
they are not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make
such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the
financial forecasts and projections and other data that have
been furnished or otherwise provided to us, including the
forecasts concerning the Company prepared by the management of
the Company that you directed us to utilize for purposes of our
analysis, we have assumed that such financial forecasts and
projections and other data were reasonably prepared on a basis
reflecting the best currently available estimates and good faith
judgments of the management of the Parent and the Company, as
applicable, as to those matters, and we have relied upon such
financial forecasts and projections and other data in arriving
at our opinion. We express no opinion with respect to such
financial forecasts and projections and other data or the
assumptions upon which they are based. We have not made any
independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
of the Company or the Parent, nor have we been furnished with
any such appraisals. We have assumed, with your consent, that
the Amalgamation will be treated as a reorganization for United
States federal income tax purposes. We have assumed that the
Amalgamation will be consummated in accordance with the terms
set forth in the Amalgamation Agreement, which we have further
assumed will be identical in all material respects to the Draft
Amalgamation Agreement, and without amendment or waiver of any
material terms or conditions set forth in the Amalgamation
Agreement. We have further assumed that all material
governmental, regulatory and other consents, approvals and
waivers necessary for the consummation of the Amalgamation will
be obtained without any adverse effect on the Company, the
Parent, the Amalgamation or the contemplated benefits of the
Amalgamation meaningful to our analysis. Our opinion is
necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion, and we do not
have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this opinion.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
the Parent (the Board) in connection with the
proposed Amalgamation and will receive a fee for services
rendered in connection with the proposed Amalgamation, a portion
of which has been paid and the remainder of which is contingent
on the consummation of the Amalgamation. In addition, the Parent
has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out
of our engagement. During the two years preceding the date of
this opinion, we have not been engaged by, performed any
services for or received any compensation from the Parent or any
other parties to the Amalgamation (other than any amounts that
were paid to us under the letter agreement pursuant to which we
were retained as a financial advisor to the Parent in connection
with the Amalgamation and the agreement by which we were
retained as dealer manager for the Parent in connection with the
exchange offer by Parent for all of the Company Common Shares).
As of the date of this opinion, four merchant banking funds
affiliated with Greenhill & Co., LLC owned an
aggregate of 2,571,427 Parent Common Shares, and certain
employees of Greenhill & Co., LLC and its affiliates
have interests in one or more of such funds.
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board, and is rendered to the Board in connection with its
consideration of the proposed Amalgamation and may not be used
for any other purpose without our prior written consent, except
that this opinion may, if required by law, be included in its
entirety in any proxy or other information statement or
registration statement to be mailed to the shareholders of the
Parent and the Company in connection with the Amalgamation. We
are not expressing an opinion as to any aspect of the proposed
Amalgamation, other than the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to the Parent of the Consideration to be paid by the
Parent pursuant to the proposed Amalgamation. In particular, we
express no opinion as to the prices at which the Parent Common
Shares will trade at any future time. We express no opinion with
respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of the Parent, or any class of
such persons relative to the Consideration or with respect to
the fairness of any such compensation. This opinion has been
approved by our fairness committee. This opinion does not
address
C-2
the underlying business decision of the Parent to engage in the
Amalgamation or the relative merits of the Amalgamation as
compared to any other alternative business strategies that might
exist for the Parent and as such is not intended to be and does
not constitute a recommendation to the members of the Board as
to whether they should approve the proposed Amalgamation, the
documents in connection therewith or any related matters. In
addition, this opinion is not intended to be and does not
constitute a recommendation as to whether the shareholders of
the Parent should approve the issuance of the Parent Common
Shares in the Amalgamation or take any other action at any
meeting of the shareholders of the Parent convened in connection
with the Amalgamation.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, including the limitations
and assumptions set forth herein, we are of the opinion that as
of the date hereof the Consideration to be paid by the Parent
pursuant to the proposed Amalgamation is fair, from a financial
point of view, to the Parent.
Very best regards,
GREENHILL & CO., LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
F. Greenhill
|
Robert F. Greenhill
Managing Director
C-3
Annex D
July 8, 2009
The Board of Directors
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
American International Building
29 Pembroke Road
Pembroke, HM 08, Bermuda
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of common shares, par
value $0.01 per share (the Company Common Shares),
of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) of the
consideration to be paid to such holders in the proposed
amalgamation (the Transaction) of the Company with a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus Holdings, Ltd. (the
Acquiror). Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation (the Agreement), among the Company, the
Acquiror and its subsidiary, Validus Ltd. (the
Amalgamation Sub), the Company will be amalgamated
(the Amalgamation) with the Amalgamation Sub
whereupon the amalgamated company will be a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Acquiror. Pursuant to the Amalgamation, each
outstanding Company Common Share, other than Company Common
Shares owned by the Acquiror and its subsidiaries and Dissenting
Shares (as defined in the Agreement), will be cancelled and
converted into the right to receive for each Company Common
Share consideration equal to $7.50 in cash without interest (the
Cash Consideration) and 0.9727 shares (the
Share Consideration, and together with the Cash
Consideration, the Consideration) of the
Acquirors voting common shares, par value $0.175 per share
(the Acquiror Common Shares).
In arriving at our opinion, we have (i) reviewed a draft
dated July 8, 2009 of the Agreement; (ii) reviewed
certain publicly available business and financial information
concerning the Company and the Acquiror and the industries in
which they operate; (iii) compared the proposed financial
terms of the Transaction with the publicly available financial
terms of certain transactions involving companies we deemed
relevant and the consideration paid for such companies;
(iv) compared the financial and operating performance of
the Company and the Acquiror with publicly available information
concerning certain other companies we deemed relevant and
reviewed the current and historical market prices of the Company
Common Shares and the Acquiror Common Shares and certain
publicly traded securities of such other companies;
(v) reviewed certain financial analyses and forecasts
provided by the management of the Company
and/or the
Acquiror or prepared as directed by the management of the
Company, including (a) certain internal financial analyses
and forecasts prepared by the management of the Company, or as
directed by the management of the Company, relating to the
Companys business, (b) certain internal financial
analyses and forecasts prepared by the management of the
Acquiror relating to the Acquirors business as adjusted as
directed by the management of the Company and (c) certain
internal financial analyses and forecasts relating to the
combined business of the Company and the Acquiror (the
Combined Business) prepared by the management of the
Acquiror and adjusted as directed by the management of the
Company; and (vi) performed such other financial studies
and analyses and considered such other information as we deemed
appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Company and the Acquiror with respect to
certain aspects of the Transaction, and the past and current
business operations of the Company and the Acquiror, the
financial condition and future prospects and operations of the
Company and the Acquiror, the effects of the Transaction on the
financial condition and future prospects of the Company and the
Acquiror, and certain other matters we believed necessary or
appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with us by the
Company or the Acquiror or
D-1
otherwise reviewed by or for us, and we have not independently
verified (nor have we assumed responsibility or liability for
independently verifying) any such information or its accuracy or
completeness. We have not conducted any valuation or appraisal
of any assets or liabilities, nor have we evaluated the solvency
of the Company or the Acquiror under any state, federal or other
laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. We
have not been provided with any valuation or appraisal of any
assets or liabilities on which we were permitted to or did rely.
In relying on financial analyses and forecasts provided to us or
prepared as directed by management of the Company or derived
from any of the foregoing, we have assumed that they have been
reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best
currently available estimates and judgments by management as to
the expected future results of operations and financial
condition of the Company, the Acquiror and the Combined
Business. We express no view as to any analyses or forecasts
referred to herein or the assumptions on which they were based.
We have also assumed that the Transaction and the other
transactions contemplated by the Agreement will qualify as a
tax-free reorganization for United States federal income tax
purposes, will have the purchase accounting consequences
described in discussions with, and materials furnished to us by,
representatives of the Company and the Acquiror and will be
consummated as described in the Agreement, and that the
definitive Agreement will not differ in any material respects
from the draft thereof furnished to us. We have also assumed
that the representations and warranties made by the Company and
the Acquiror in the Agreement and the related agreements are and
will be true and correct in all respects material to our
analysis. We are not legal, regulatory, actuarial or tax experts
and have relied on the assessments made by advisors to the
Company with respect to such issues. Except as would not be
material to our analysis, we have further assumed that all
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals
necessary for the consummation of the Transaction will be
obtained without any adverse effect on the Company or the
Acquiror or on the contemplated benefits of the Transaction.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Consideration to be paid to the
holders of the Company Common Shares (other than Acquiror and
its affiliates) in the proposed Transaction and we express no
opinion as to the fairness of the Transaction to, or any
consideration paid in connection therewith to, the holders of
any other class of securities, creditors or other constituencies
of the Company or as to the underlying decision by the Company
to engage in the Transaction. Furthermore, we express no opinion
with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any
officers, directors, or employees of any party to the
Transaction, or any class of such persons relative to the
Consideration to be paid to the holders of the Company Common
Shares in the Transaction or with respect to the fairness of any
such compensation. We are expressing no opinion herein as to the
price at which the Company Common Shares or the Acquiror Common
Shares will trade at any future time.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Transaction and will receive a fee from the
Company for our services, a substantial portion of which will
become payable only if the proposed Transaction is consummated.
In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. During the two years
preceding the date of this letter, we and our affiliates have
had commercial or investment banking relationships with the
Company and the Acquiror, for which we and such of our
affiliates have received customary compensation. Such services
during such period have included an engagement to act as
financial advisor to the Company in connection with its analysis
and consideration of various potential strategic alternatives.
That engagement resulted in our engagement to act as the
Companys financial advisor in connection with the
Transaction. In addition, our commercial banking affiliate is a
lender under the outstanding $500,000,000 senior credit
facilities of the Company (the Company Credit
Facility), for which it receives customary compensation or
other financial benefits. It is anticipated that the Company
Credit Facility will be amended in connection with the
Transaction and that such amendment will result in the payment
of customary compensation to our affiliate and in certain of the
terms under the Company Credit Facility being amended to be more
favorable to the lenders thereunder. Our commercial banking
affiliate is lead arranger of the Acquirors syndicated
credit facility (the Acquiror Credit Facility),
which includes a $200,000,000 three-year unsecured facility and
a $500,000,000 five-year secured letter of credit facility, and
such affiliate receives customary compensation and other
financial benefits in
D-2
connection with the Acquiror Credit Facility. It is anticipated
that the Acquiror Credit Facility will be amended in connection
with the Transaction and that such amendment will result in the
payment of customary compensation to our affiliate and in
certain of the terms under the Acquiror Credit Facility being
amended to be more favorable to the lenders thereunder. We acted
as one of the underwriters for the Acquirors initial
public offering in July 2007, and we received customary
compensation in connection therewith. Our services also include
treasury and security services provided to the Acquiror, for
which we receive customary compensation. In the ordinary course
of our businesses, we and our affiliates may actively trade the
debt and equity securities of the Company or the Acquiror or
certain of its affiliates for our own account or for the
accounts of customers and, accordingly, we may at any time hold
long or short positions in such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the Consideration to be paid to the
holders of the Company Common Shares in the proposed Transaction
is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders (other
than the Acquiror and its affiliates).
The issuance of this opinion has been approved by a fairness
opinion committee of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. This
letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
Transaction. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation
to any shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder
should vote with respect to the Transaction or any other matter.
This opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated
(in whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose
whatsoever except with our prior written approval. This opinion
may be reproduced in full in any proxy or information statement
mailed to shareholders of the Company but may not otherwise be
disclosed publicly in any manner without our prior written
approval.
Very truly yours,
/s/ J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC.
D-3
Annex E
Proposed
IPC Bye-Law Amendment
The following shall be inserted as bye-law 90 under the caption
MEMBER VOTE TO APPROVE AN AMALGAMATION:
90. Amalgamation
A resolution proposed for consideration at a general meeting to
approve the amalgamation of the Company with any other company
shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast by Members present or represented by proxy and voting at
such general meeting and the quorum for such general meeting
shall be as set out in Bye-Law 39.
E-1
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Bye-law 50 of Validus Bye-laws provides, among other
things, that Validus will, in the case of directors and officers
of Validus, and may (in the discretion of the Board of
Directors), in the case of employees and agents, indemnify, in
accordance with and to the full extent now or hereafter
permitted by law, any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (including, without limitation,
an action by or in the right of Validus), by reason of his
acting in such capacity or his acting in any other capacity for,
or on behalf of, Validus, against any liability or expense
actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect
thereof. Validus shall, in the case of directors and officers,
and may, in other cases, advance the expenses of defending any
such act, suit or proceeding in accordance with and to the full
extent now or hereafter permitted by law.
Bye-law 50 of Validus Bye-laws also provides that none of
the officers or directors of Validus will be personally liable
to Validus or its shareholders for any action or failure to act
to the full extent that they are indemnified under Validus
Bye-laws.
Bye-law 50A of Validus Bye-laws provides that each
shareholder agrees to waive any claim or right of action such
shareholder might have, whether individually or by or in the
right of Validus, against any director or officer on account of
any action taken by such director or officer, or the failure of
such director or officer to take any action in the performance
of his duties with or for Validus; provided that such waiver
shall not extend to any matter in respect of any fraud or
dishonesty which may attach to such director or officer.
Section 98 of the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda provides
generally that a Bermuda company may indemnify its directors,
officers and auditors against any liability which by virtue of
any rule of law would otherwise be imposed on them in respect of
any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust,
except in cases where such liability arises from fraud or
dishonesty of which such director, officer or auditor may be
guilty in relation to such company. Section 98 further
provides that a Bermuda company may indemnify its directors,
officers and auditors against any liability incurred by them in
defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which
judgment is awarded in their favor or in which they are
acquitted or granted relief by the Supreme Court of Bermuda
pursuant to section 281 of the Companies Act.
Section 98 further provides that any provision, whether
contained in the bye-laws of a company or in any contract or
arrangement between such company and any director exempting or
indemnifying him against any liability which would otherwise
attach to him in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of which he
may be guilty in relation to such company, shall be void.
Section 98A of the Companies Act permits a Bermuda company
to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any
officer or director in respect of any loss or liability
attaching to him in respect of any negligence, default, breach
of duty or breach of trust, whether or not such Bermuda company
may otherwise indemnify such officer or director.
Validus may purchase directors and officers
liability insurance policies. Such insurance would be available
to Validus directors and officers in accordance with its
terms. In addition, certain directors may be covered by
directors and officers liability insurance policies
purchased by their respective employers.
Any underwriting agreement that Validus may enter into in
connection with an offering of securities pursuant to this
registration statement may include provisions providing that the
underwriters are obligated, under certain circumstances, to
indemnify the directors, certain officers and the controlling
persons of Validus against certain liabilities under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
|
|
Item 21.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Exhibits.
See the Exhibit Index.
II-1
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
None.
(c) Reports, Opinions and Appraisals.
None.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(a) (1) To file, during any period in which offers or
sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this
registration statement:
(i) to include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of joint
proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC pursuant to
Rule 424(b) promulgated under the Securities Act if, in the
aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more
than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering
price set forth in the Calculation of Registration
Fee table in the effective registration statement; and
(iii) to include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment
shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to
the securities offered therein, and the offering of such
securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
(b) That, for purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, each filing of the registrants annual
report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration
statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(c) (1) That prior to any public reoffering of the
securities registered hereunder through use of a prospectus
which is a part of this registration statement, by any person or
party who is deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.
(2) That every prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant
to the immediately preceding paragraph, or (ii) that
purports to meet the requirements of section 10(a)(3) of
the Act and is used in connection with an offering of securities
subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of an
amendment to the registration statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be
II-2
a new registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(d) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to
directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
(b) To respond to requests for information that are
incorporated by reference into the joint proxy
statement/prospectus pursuant to Item 4, 10(b), 11, or 13
of this Form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class
mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information
contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of
the registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(c) To supply by means of a post-effective amendment all
information concerning a transaction, and the company being
acquired involved therein, that was not the subject of and
included in the registration statement when it became effective.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this amendment to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Hamilton, Bermuda, on August 5,
2009.
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
By:
/s/ Joseph
E. (Jeff) Consolino
Name: Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
and Executive Vice President
Power of
Attorney
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed below by
Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino for himself and as attorney-in-fact
for each other person named below in the capacities indicated on
August 5, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
*
Edward
J. Noonan
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
George
P. Reeth
|
|
Director and President
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph
E. (Jeff) Consolino
Joseph
E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
*
Matthew
J. Grayson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Jeffrey
W. Greenberg
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
John
J. Hendrickson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Sander
M. Levy
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Jean-Marie
Nessi
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Mandakini
Puri
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
*
Sumit
Rajpal
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Alok
Singh
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
*
Christopher
E. Watson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
* By:
|
/s/ Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
|
Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
Attorney-in-Fact
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of July 9,
2009, among IPC Holdings, Ltd., Validus Holdings, Ltd. and
Validus Ltd. (included as Annex A to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus included in this registration statement)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Memorandum of Association dated October 10, 2005
(Incorporated by Reference from
S-1 SEC File
No. 333-139989)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bye-laws (Incorporated by Reference from
S-1 SEC File
No. 333-139989)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Share Certificate (Incorporated by Reference
from S-1 SEC
File
No. 333-139989)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Deposit of Memorandum of Increase of Share
Capital dated October 28, 2005 (Incorporated by Reference
from S-1 SEC
File
No. 333-139989)
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Appleby regarding the validity of the securities
being registered*
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Tax Opinion of Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp*
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
Tax Opinion of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP*
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges*
|
|
15
|
.1
|
|
Letter Regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 21 to Validus Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
February 27, 2009)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers, an independent registered
public accounting firm
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Appleby (included in the opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.1 to this Registration Statement)
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of KPMG, an independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
23
|
.4
|
|
Consent of Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp (included in
the opinion filed as Exhibit 8.1 to this Registration
Statement)
|
|
23
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Sullivan and Cromwell LLP (included in the opinion
filed as Exhibit 8.2 to this Registration Statement)
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to the
Registration Statement filed on May 12, 2009)
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Greenhill & Co., LLC
|
|
99
|
.2
|
|
Consent of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Form of Proxy Card of Validus Holdings, Ltd.*
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Form of Proxy Card of IPC Holdings, Ltd.*
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
Voting Agreement by and between IPC Holdings, Ltd. and Aquiline
Financial Services Fund L.P. and Aquiline Financial
Services Fund (Offshore) L.P. dated as of July 9, 2009.*
|
|
99
|
.6
|
|
Voting Agreement by and between IPC Holdings, Ltd. and New
Mountain Investments II, L.P., Allegheny New Mountain Partners,
L.P. and New Mountain Affiliated Investors II, L.P. dated as of
July 9, 2009.*
|
|
99
|
.7
|
|
Voting Agreement by and between IPC Holdings, Ltd. and Vestar
AIV Holdings A L.P., Vestar AIV Holdings Validus Ltd., and
Vestar AIV Holdings B L.P. dated as of July 9, 2009.*
|