PRRN14A
PRELIMINARY COPY, DATED JUNE 23, 2009
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Amendment
No. 3
to
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the
Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant þ
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§ 240.14a-12
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in
its Charter)
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o No
fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
Common Shares, $0.175 par value per share
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
68,520,737
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
$1,482,329,499.84
$82,713.99 (based upon the product of $1,482,329,499.84 and
the fee rate of $55.80 per million dollars set forth in the Fee
Rate Advisory #5 for Fiscal Year 2009)
o Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
þ |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount previously paid: $84,262.55
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, schedule or registration statement no.: Schedule 14A
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing party: Validus Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date filed: April 16, 2009
|
PRELIMINARY COPY, DATED JUNE 23,
2009 SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
NOTICE OF
COURT MEETING
|
|
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF BERMUDA
|
No.
[] of 2009
|
CIVIL JURISDICTION
(COMMERCIAL COURT)
IN THE
MATTER OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD
and
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1981
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by an Order dated
[ ] 2009 made in the above matters the Court
has directed a meeting (including any adjournments or
postponements thereof, the court-ordered IPC
meeting) to be convened of the holders of the common
shares, par value $0.01 per share (the IPC Shares),
of IPC Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company
(IPC) (other than any IPC Shares that are registered
in the name of, or beneficially owned by, Validus, IPC or any of
their respective subsidiaries or which Validus, IPC or any of
their respective subsidiaries acquires or becomes the beneficial
owner of) for the purpose of considering and, if the IPC
shareholders so determine, approving a scheme of arrangement
(the Scheme of Arrangement) to be made between IPC
and the holders of such IPC Shares, in the form attached as
Annex A hereto, and that the court-ordered IPC meeting will
be held at [ ] on [ ] 2009, at
[10:00] a.m., Atlantic time.
The proxy statement that accompanies this notice constitutes the
explanatory statement required to be furnished pursuant to
Part VII of The Companies Act of 1981 of Bermuda, as
amended.
If you are a shareholder of record, please complete, sign, date
and return the enclosed proxy in the return envelope furnished
for that purpose, as promptly as possible, whether or not you
plan to attend the meeting. If you own your IPC Shares through a
bank, broker or other nominee, you should follow the
instructions provided by your bank, broker or other nominee when
voting your IPC Shares.
In the case of joint holders, the vote of the senior who tenders
a vote, whether in person or by proxy, will be accepted to the
exclusion of the vote(s) of the other joint holder(s) and, for
this purpose, seniority will be determined by the order in which
the names stand in the register of members of IPC in respect of
the joint holding.
Entitlement to attend and vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting
and the number of votes which may be cast thereat will be
determined by reference to the register of members of IPC as of
[ ], 2009. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries will not be entitled to vote these IPC
Shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
Voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting will be conducted on a
poll rather than a show of hands.
By the said Order, the Court has appointed [ ]
or, failing him, [ ] or, failing him,
[ ] to act as Chairman of the court-ordered IPC
meeting and has directed the Chairman to report the result
thereof to the Court.
The Scheme of Arrangement will be subject to the subsequent
sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the satisfaction
or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions thereto.
Dated [ ] 2009
COURT-ORDERED
MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS
OF
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
TO BE
HELD ON [ ], 2009
PROXY
STATEMENT
OF
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
This proxy statement (the proxy statement) and the
enclosed BLUE proxy card are furnished by Validus Holdings,
Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company (Validus), in
connection with Validus solicitation of proxies to be used
at the court-ordered meeting (including any adjournments or
postponements thereof, the court-ordered IPC
meeting) of holders of common shares, par value $0.01 per
share (the IPC Shares), of IPC Holdings, Ltd., a
Bermuda exempted company (IPC) (other than any IPC
Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries)
to be held on [ ], 2009, at
[ ] at [ ] Atlantic Time, for
the purpose of giving such holders of IPC Shares the opportunity
to consider and, if the IPC shareholders so determine, approve a
scheme of arrangement (the Scheme of Arrangement)
under Bermuda law to effect the acquisition of IPC by Validus
(the Acquisition) pursuant to the Scheme of
Arrangement set forth in Annex A attached hereto.
We are soliciting proxies to be used at the court-ordered IPC
meeting to allow IPC shareholders, if they so determine, to
approve the Scheme of Arrangement in connection with
Validus offer to acquire all of the IPC Shares for $3.75
in cash (less any applicable withholding taxes and without
interest) and 1.1234 Validus voting common shares, par value
$0.175 per share (the Validus Shares) for each IPC
Share (together, the Validus Transaction
Consideration). Validus is simultaneously pursuing three
alternatives to consummate the Acquisition: its pending
amalgamation offer (the Validus Amalgamation Offer);
its pending exchange offer (the Exchange Offer); and
the previously announced Scheme of Arrangement as set forth in
Annex A hereto under Part VII of The Companies Act of
1981 of Bermuda, as amended (the Companies Act).
Validus will determine which method is most effective and
efficient to consummate the Acquisition. If the IPC board of
directors cooperates with Validus and executes an amalgamation
agreement with Validus, the court-ordered IPC meeting may be
unnecessary and may not be held. While Validus continues to seek
a consensual amalgamation transaction with IPC, we will continue
to pursue the Scheme of Arrangement and Exchange Offer in order
to complete the Acquisition and will seek to replace the IPC
board of directors if an agreement with the IPC board of
directors is not reached in a timely fashion.
In order to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, IPC
shareholders must approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must separately approve the
Scheme of Arrangement, certain implementing resolutions must be
approved by the IPC shareholders (the Validus
Proposals), and the Scheme of Arrangement must be
sanctioned by the Supreme Court of Bermuda. If the IPC
shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the
Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC
board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the
IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at a
subsequent requisitioned special general meeting of IPC
shareholders (the IPC special general meeting). On
June 16, 2009, Validus filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) a definitive proxy
statement which is being used to solicit written requisitions
from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors
to call the IPC special general meeting. Following IPC
shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and
the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where
relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order
from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of
Companies, at which time (the closing or the
effective time) the Scheme of Arrangement will be
effective.
VALIDUS IS DISTRIBUTING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN ORDER TO URGE
IPCS SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE FOR THE SCHEME OF
ARRANGEMENT AT THE COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING.
The court-ordered IPC meeting is being held in accordance with
an order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued on
[ ], 2009, at the request of Validus in
accordance with Bermuda law. The record date for determining the
IPC shareholders who will be entitled to vote at the
court-ordered IPC meeting is [ ], 2009. The
Scheme of
Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the
holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value
of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy. The presence at the court-ordered
IPC meeting of two or more persons present in person and
representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total
issued and outstanding IPC Shares throughout the meeting is
required to constitute a quorum thereat.
Based on Validus and IPCs respective capitalizations
as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234,
Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the
aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the Validus Shares on a
fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition.
Validus Shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (the
NYSE) under the symbol VR. The closing
price of a Validus common share on the NYSE on June 22,
2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this
proxy statement, was $20.93. IPC Shares, which are currently
quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ)
under the symbol IPCR and the Bermuda Stock Exchange
under the symbol IPCR BH, would be delisted upon
completion of the Acquisition. The closing price of an IPC Share
on NASDAQ on June 22, 2009, the last practicable date prior
to the filing of this proxy statement, was $26.51. All
references to dollars and $ in this
proxy statement refer to U.S. dollars.
This proxy statement provides IPC shareholders with detailed
information about the court-ordered IPC meeting and the Scheme
of Arrangement and is intended to satisfy the requirement, under
Section 100 of the Companies Act, of a statement explaining
the effect of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement. You can also
obtain information from publicly available documents filed by
Validus and IPC with the SEC. Validus encourages you to read
this entire document carefully, including the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 40.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend
the court-ordered IPC meeting, please take time to vote by
completing and mailing your enclosed BLUE proxy card or by
following the voting instructions provided to you if you own
your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee. If you do
not receive such instructions, you may request them from that
firm. If you have any questions or need additional copies of the
proxy materials, please call Georgeson Inc. at the phone numbers
listed below.
199 Water
Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call:
(212) 440-9800
or
Toll Free: at
(888) 274-5119
Email: validusIPC@georgeson.com
Neither the SEC nor any state securities regulatory agency
has approved or disapproved the Scheme of Arrangement, passed
upon the merits or fairness thereof or passed upon the adequacy
or accuracy of the disclosure in this proxy statement. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This proxy statement is dated [ ], 2009
and is first being mailed to IPC shareholders on or about
[ ], 2009
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the court-ordered IPC meeting to be held on
[ ], 2009.
This proxy statement and the related proxy materials are
available free of charge on Validus website at
www.validustransaction.com.
SOURCES
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement includes information, including important
business and financial information, also set forth in documents
filed by Validus and IPC with the SEC, and those documents
include information about Validus and IPC that is not included
in or delivered with this proxy statement. You can obtain any of
the documents filed by Validus or IPC, as the case may be, with
the SEC from the SEC or, without charge, from the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov.
IPC shareholders also may obtain documents filed by IPC or
Validus with the SEC or documents incorporated by reference in
this proxy statement free of cost, by directing a written or
oral request to Validus at:
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Attention: Jon Levenson
(441) 278-9000
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least five business days
before the date of the meeting. This means you must request this
information no later than [ ], 2009.
Validus will mail properly requested documents to requesting
shareholders by first class mail, or another equally prompt
means, within one business day after receipt of such request.
The information concerning IPC, its business, management and
operations presented or incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement has been taken from, or is based upon, publicly
available information on file with the SEC and other publicly
available information. Although Validus has no knowledge that
would indicate that statements and information relating to IPC
contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement,
in reliance upon publicly available information, are inaccurate
or incomplete, to date it has not had access to the full books
and records of IPC, was not involved in the preparation of such
information and statements and is not in a position to verify
any such information or statements.
The consolidated financial statements of IPC appearing in its
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (including schedules
appearing therein), and IPC managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 included therein, have been audited by an
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in
their reports thereon, included therein, and included
and/or
incorporated herein by reference. Validus has not obtained the
authorization of IPCs independent auditors to incorporate
by reference the audit reports relating to this information.
Pursuant to
Rule 12b-21
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), Validus requested that IPC provide
Validus with information required for complete disclosure
regarding the businesses, operations, financial condition and
management of IPC. Validus will amend or supplement this proxy
statement to provide any and all information Validus receives
from IPC, if Validus receives the information before the
court-ordered IPC meeting and Validus considers it to be
material, reliable and appropriate.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page [ ].
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
-i-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
I-1
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
-ii-
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ACQUISITION
AND THE COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING
The following questions and answers highlight selected
information from this proxy statement and may not contain all
the information that is important to you. Validus encourages you
to read this entire document carefully.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the court-ordered IPC meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The court-ordered IPC meeting is scheduled to take place at
[ ], Atlantic Time, on [ ],
2009, at [ ]. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the purpose of the court-ordered IPC meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The purpose of the meeting is to seek IPC shareholder approval
of the Scheme of Arrangement. IPC shareholder approval is a
necessary step toward consummation of the Acquisition without
the cooperation of the IPC board of directors. |
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote on at the court-ordered IPC
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
At the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC shareholders will be asked
to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Scheme of
Arrangement. |
|
Q: |
|
What would happen under the Scheme of Arrangement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, Validus will
effect the Acquisition by the transfer of all outstanding IPC
Shares (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries) to Validus in exchange for the Validus
Transaction Consideration. IPC would thereby become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why is Validus proposing the Acquisition? |
|
A: |
|
Based on a number of factors described below under The
Acquisition Reasons to Vote FOR the
Scheme of Arrangement, Validus believes that the Acquisition
represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit
that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the
global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the
Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the
superior growth potential of a combined company that would be a
leading carrier in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and
insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality
diversification in profitable business lines. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why should IPC shareholders vote FOR the Scheme
of Arrangement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Validus believes that the combination of Validus and IPC offers
a number of benefits to holders of IPC Shares, including the
following: |
|
|
|
The Scheme of Arrangement provides a premium to IPC
shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders
as a portion of the Validus Transaction Consideration pursuant
to the Scheme of Arrangement represent what we believe is an
attractive investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Validus/IPC combination will have a strong balance
sheet with minimal exposure to risky asset classes.
|
|
|
|
Validus offers IPC a highly experienced, first class
management team.
|
|
|
|
The Scheme of Arrangement provides IPC shareholders
with an opportunity for stable, profitable diversification into
attractive business lines and further growth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
See The Acquisition Reasons to Vote
FOR the Scheme of Arrangement below. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Is Validus pursuing multiple acquisition strategies? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes, in addition to proposing the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus
has made the Validus Amalgamation Offer and has commenced the
Exchange Offer. The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Scheme of
Arrangement and the Exchange Offer are alternative methods for
Validus to acquire all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares
on the same economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these
transaction structures can be pursued to completion. |
-1-
|
|
|
|
|
Validus intends to seek to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever
method Validus determines is most effective and efficient to
consummate the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will the Scheme of Arrangement become effective? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
A Scheme of Arrangement under Bermuda law is an arrangement
between a company and its shareholders. In order to implement
the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the
Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must
separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC
shareholders must approve the Validus Proposals and the Scheme
of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of
Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate
approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by
either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying
with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC
approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting. On
June 16, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a definitive
proxy statement which is being used to solicit written
requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board
of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. In order
to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special
general meeting, written requisitions from the holders of 10% of
the IPC Shares must be deposited with IPC. Following IPC
shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting and
the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where
relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order
from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of
Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be
effective. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How would the Scheme of Arrangement work? |
|
A: |
|
Procedurally, the Scheme of Arrangement can be divided into the
following stages: |
|
|
|
(1) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an order
giving directions for the holding and conduct of the
court-ordered IPC meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Requisitioning the IPC special general meeting. On
June 16, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a definitive
proxy statement which is being used to solicit written
requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board
of directors to call the IPC special general meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Holding the court-ordered IPC meeting to which this
proxy statement relates to consider and, if the IPC shareholders
so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of
Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the
holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value
of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Holding the IPC special general meeting to approve
resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in
connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement.
Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by
proxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
(6) Delivering a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of
Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda
Registrar of Companies.
|
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the Scheme of Arrangement to become
effective? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Validus continues to pursue the Scheme of Arrangement; however,
it is possible that the IPC board of directors will continue to
seek to take measures that could delay or impede the
consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement. Even if the Scheme of
Arrangement has been approved by the IPC shareholders, Validus
may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at any time prior to the
commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without obtaining the
approval of the IPC shareholders, if any event or condition
occurs which would cause any of the conditions to the
effectiveness |
-2-
|
|
|
|
|
of the Scheme of Arrangement not to be satisfied by
November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as Validus
may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow). |
|
Q: |
|
What would IPC shareholders receive in the Scheme of
Arrangement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Under the terms of the Scheme of Arrangement, each outstanding
IPC Share (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or
their respective subsidiaries), would be transferred to Validus
in exchange for the Validus Transaction Consideration upon the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement. IPC shareholders
would not receive any fractional Validus Shares in the Scheme of
Arrangement. Instead, IPC shareholders would be paid cash in
lieu of the fractional share interest to which such shareholders
would otherwise be entitled as described under
Summary The Scheme of Arrangement
Validus Transaction Consideration on
page [ ]. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What percentage of Validus Shares will the former holders of
IPC Shares own after the Acquisition? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Based on Validus and IPCs respective capitalizations
as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234,
Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the
aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the Validus Shares on a
fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, do I have to
take any action to exchange my IPC Shares for Validus
Transaction Consideration? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Validus will appoint BNY Mellon Shareowner Services as exchange
agent to transfer and pay the Validus Transaction Consideration
to persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective
subsidiaries) in exchange for share certificates representing
IPC Shares or for non-certificated shares represented by
book-entry (book-entry shares). At or about the
effective time, Validus will deposit with the exchange agent the
cash payable and the Validus Shares issuable as Validus
Transaction Consideration and will provide for the cash issuable
in lieu of fractional shares. Promptly after the effective time,
the exchange agent will mail each holder of IPC Shares
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than
Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) instructions for
surrendering share certificates and book-entry shares. The
exchange agent will transfer and pay the Validus Transaction
Consideration and cash in lieu of fractional shares, less any
applicable withholding taxes, to the persons holding IPC Shares
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than
Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) promptly
following the exchange agents receipt of the share
certificates (or book-entry shares). No interest will be paid or
accrued on the cash payable upon the surrender of any share
certificate (or book-entry shares). Until so surrendered, each
such IPC Share certificate (or book-entry share) will represent
after the effective time for all purposes only evidence of the
right to receive such Validus Transaction Consideration. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the market value of my IPC Shares as of a recent
date? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
On March 30, 2009, the last trading day before Validus made
its initial offer (the Initial Validus Offer) to
acquire IPC in a transaction whereby each IPC Share would have
been exchanged for 1.2037 Validus Shares under the proposed
agreement and plan of amalgamation (the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement), the closing price of an IPC Share
was $25.41. On June 22, 2009, the last practicable date
prior to the filing of this proxy statement, the closing price
of an IPC Share was $26.51. IPC shareholders are encouraged to
obtain a recent quotation for IPC Shares before deciding how to
vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are IPC shareholders able to dissent? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
IPC shareholders will be entitled to be present and be heard at
the Supreme Court of Bermuda hearing to sanction the Scheme of
Arrangement. Any IPC shareholder who wishes to may oppose the
sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement and may make
presentations to the court on the hearing of the petition. IPC
shareholders will be notified of the date of the Supreme Court
of Bermuda hearing to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement once it
is set. IPC shareholders may also vote against the Scheme of
Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are IPC shareholders able to exercise appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will
be binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they voted in
favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC
meeting or of the resolutions |
-3-
|
|
|
|
|
proposed at the IPC special general meeting, and IPC
shareholders will not be entitled to exercise any appraisal
rights. Please see The Scheme of Arrangement
Dissenters and Appraisal Rights of IPC Shareholders on
page [ ]. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the closing conditions set forth in the Scheme of
Arrangement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
In addition to the requisite approval by IPC shareholders at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, the approval by IPC shareholders at
the IPC special general meeting of resolutions determined by
Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with
implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, the sanction of the
Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the
filing of a copy of the court sanction order with the Bermuda
Registrar of Companies (collectively, the Procedural
Conditions), the effectiveness of the Scheme of
Arrangement is subject to the satisfaction or, where relevant,
waiver of certain other conditions, including the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not
have any liability with respect to the termination of the
Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation, as amended on March 5,
2009, among Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max), IPC and
IPC Limited (the Max Amalgamation Agreement), and
Max shall not have asserted any claim of liability or breach
against IPC in connection with the Max Amalgamation Agreement,
in each case, other than with respect to the possible payment of
the $50 million termination fee thereunder (the Max
Termination Fee).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the
issuance of the Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of
Arrangement as required under the rules of the NYSE. All of the
Validus officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus
refers to as its qualified sponsors (as defined in
this proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have
indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares
beneficially owned by them in favor of such approval. As of
April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially
owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus
Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders
pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement shall have been authorized
for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
|
|
|
|
There shall be no threatened or pending litigation,
suit, claim, action, proceeding or investigation before any
governmental authority that, in the judgment of Validus, is
reasonably likely to, directly or indirectly, restrain or
prohibit (or which alleges a violation of law in connection
with) the Scheme of Arrangement or is reasonably likely to
prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by
Validus or any of its affiliates.
|
|
|
|
Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have
been any material adverse effect on IPC and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole. A more than 50% decline in IPCs book
value or a more than 20% decline in IPCs book value
relative to Validus book value shall be deemed to have a
material adverse effect on IPC.
|
|
|
|
Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried
on their respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent
with past practice at all times on or after the date of this
proxy statement and prior to the commencement of the hearing of
the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of
Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
All amendments or waivers under Validus credit
facilities necessary to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement and
the other transactions contemplated by this proxy statement
shall be in full force and effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to additional conditions
referred to below in The Scheme of Arrangement
Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of
Arrangement is not conditioned on the receipt of regulatory
approvals or the elimination of the Max Termination Fee. The
conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement are
for the sole benefit of Validus and, other than the
Procedural Conditions, the Registration
Condition, the Shareholder Approval Condition
and the NYSE Listing Condition described below in
The Scheme of Arrangement Conditions to the
Scheme of Arrangement, may be waived by Validus prior to the
commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement in its discretion. |
-4-
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will be the composition of the board of directors of
Validus following the effectiveness of the Scheme of
Arrangement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Upon the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement,
Validus board of directors would consist of the directors
serving on the board of directors of Validus before the
Acquisition. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will Validus be managed following the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement? |
|
A: |
|
Upon the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, the
officers of Validus will be the officers serving Validus before
the Acquisition. |
|
Q: |
|
What shareholder vote is required to approve the Scheme of
Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting and how many votes
must be present to hold the meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in
number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered
IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or
more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Therefore, abstentions
and broker non-votes will not have the effect of a
vote for or against the Scheme of Arrangement, but will reduce
the number of votes cast and therefore increase the relative
influence of those shareholders voting. The presence at the
court-ordered IPC meeting of two or more persons present in
person and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50%
of the total issued and outstanding IPC Shares throughout the
meeting is required to constitute a quorum thereat. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the record date for the court-ordered IPC meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Only shareholders of record, as shown by the transfer books of
IPC at the close of business on [ ], 2009 (the
record date) are entitled to receive notice of and
to vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How many votes do I have and how many votes can be cast by
all IPC shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
As of [ ], 2009, there were
[ ] outstanding IPC Shares entitled to vote.
Each IPC Share (other than any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC
or their respective subsidiaries) entitles the holder of record
thereof to one vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Validus urges you to read carefully this proxy statement,
including its annexes and the documents incorporated by
reference herein. You also may want to review the documents
referenced under Where You Can Find More Information on
page [ ] and consult with your accounting,
legal and tax advisors. Once you have considered all relevant
information, Validus encourages you to fill in and return the
attached proxy card (if you are a shareholder of record) or
voting instruction form you receive from your bank, broker or
other nominee (if you hold your IPC Shares in street name). |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How can I vote my shares in person at the court-ordered IPC
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If your IPC Shares are registered directly in your name as of
the record date with the transfer agent, Computershare Investor
Services, you are considered the shareholder of
record with respect to those shares, and the proxy
materials and proxy card are being sent directly to you. As the
shareholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at
the meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the enclosed
proxy card. Most shareholders of IPC hold their shares through a
bank, broker or other nominee (that is, in street
name) rather than directly in their own name. If you hold
your shares in street name, you are a beneficial
holder, and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you
by your bank, broker or other nominee together with a voting
instruction form. Because a beneficial holder is not the
shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person
at the meeting unless you have previously either arranged for
the IPC Shares beneficially owned by you to be transferred of
record into your name by the record date for the court-ordered
IPC meeting or secured a valid proxy or power of attorney from
the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares as of
the record date for the court-ordered IPC meeting (and who has
received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder
of record pursuant to a legal proxy with a power of
subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record
date). Even if you plan to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting,
we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described
below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not
to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting. |
-5-
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How can I vote my shares without attending the court-ordered
IPC meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If you are the shareholder of record, you may direct your vote
without attending the court-ordered IPC meeting by completing
and mailing your proxy card in the enclosed pre-paid envelope.
If you hold your IPC Shares in street name, you should complete
and return the voting instruction form you receive from your
bank, broker or other nominee in accordance with the
instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other
nominee. Your voting instruction form may contain instructions
from your bank, broker or other nominee that allow you to vote
your shares using the Internet or by telephone. Please consult
with your bank, broker or other nominee if you have any
questions regarding the voting of shares held in street name. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need for admission to the court-ordered IPC
meeting? |
|
A: |
|
You are entitled to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting only if
you are (i) a shareholder of record or (ii) a
beneficial owner or other person holding a valid proxy or power
of attorney from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds
your shares (and who has received a valid proxy or power of
attorney from the shareholder of record pursuant to a
legal proxy with power of subdelegation from the
shareholder of record as of the record date). If you are the
shareholder of record, your name will be verified against the
list of shareholders of record prior to your admittance to the
court-ordered IPC meeting. You should be prepared to present
photo identification for admission. If you hold your shares in
street name and would like to be admitted to the meeting, you
will need to provide a valid proxy or power of attorney from the
bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who
has received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the
shareholder of record pursuant to a legal proxy with
power of subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the
record date) and proof of beneficial ownership on the record
date, such as a brokerage account statement showing that you
owned IPC Shares as of the record date, a copy of the voting
instruction form provided by your bank, broker or other nominee,
or other similar evidence of ownership as of the record date, as
well as your photo identification. If you do not comply with the
procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the
court-ordered IPC meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
If my IPC Shares are held in a brokerage account or in
street name, will my broker vote my shares for
me? |
|
A: |
|
If you own your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee,
you will receive instructions from that institution on how to
instruct them to vote your shares. If you do not receive such
instructions, you may contact that institution to request them.
In accordance with NYSE rules, brokers and nominees who hold IPC
Shares in street name for customers may not exercise their
voting discretion with respect to the Scheme of Arrangement.
Accordingly, if you do not provide your bank, broker or other
nominee with instructions on how to vote your street name
shares, your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted
to vote them at the court-ordered IPC meeting, possibly
resulting in a broker non-vote. |
|
|
|
A broker non-vote with respect to the court-ordered
IPC meeting will not be considered as a vote cast with respect
to any matter presented at the court-ordered IPC meeting, but
will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum,
provided that your bank, broker or other nominee is in
attendance in person or by proxy. A broker non-vote with respect
to any proposal to be voted on at the court-ordered IPC meeting
will not have the effect of a vote for or against the proposal,
but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase
the relative influence of those shareholders voting. |
|
Q: |
|
What effect do abstentions and broker non-votes have on the
Scheme of Arrangement? |
|
A: |
|
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered
votes cast on any proposal brought before the court-ordered IPC
meeting. Because the vote required to approve the Scheme of
Arrangement is the affirmative vote of a majority in number of
the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more
in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, whether in person or by proxy, a broker non-vote with
respect to any proposal to be voted on at the court-ordered IPC
meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the
relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and
therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders
voting. See also The Court-Ordered IPC Meeting
Record Date and Shares Entitled to Vote. |
-6-
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How will my shares be voted if I sign and return a proxy card
or voting instruction form without specifying how to vote my
shares? |
|
A. |
|
If you sign and return a proxy card or voting instruction form
without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be
voted FOR the Scheme of Arrangement and as the
persons named as proxies may determine in their discretion with
respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote
before the court-ordered IPC meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I do if I want to change my vote or revoke my
proxy? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before
your proxy is voted at the court-ordered IPC meeting. If you are
a shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your
proxy by: (1) delivering to IPC (Attention: Secretary) at
American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM
08, Bermuda a written notice of revocation of your proxy;
(2) delivering to IPC an authorized proxy bearing a later
date; or (3) attending the court-ordered IPC meeting and
voting in person as described above under How can I vote my
shares in person at the court-ordered IPC meeting?
Attendance at the court-ordered IPC meeting in and of itself,
without voting in person at the court-ordered IPC meeting, will
not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked. For
shares you hold in street name, you should follow the
instructions of your bank, broker or other nominee or, if you
have obtained a valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank,
broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has
received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder
of record pursuant to a legal proxy with power of
subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record
date) giving you the right to vote your shares at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, by attending the court-ordered IPC
meeting and voting in person. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the Scheme of Arrangement? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Following the Scheme of Arrangement, as part of an overall plan,
Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between
IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to
Section 107 of the Companies Act. The Scheme of Arrangement
and subsequent short-form amalgamation are intended to
constitute a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code). Assuming it does so qualify,
U.S. holders of IPC Shares will generally recognize gain
(but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the
amount of the cash received by such U.S. holder (excluding
any cash received in lieu of a fractional share) and
(ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the sum of the cash
and the fair market value of the Validus Shares received by such
U.S. holder (including any fractional shares deemed
received by such U.S. holder), over (b) the
U.S. holders tax basis in the IPC Shares exchanged
pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement. Subject to the passive
foreign investment company rules or the potential application of
Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized upon the
Scheme of Arrangement generally will be capital gain, unless the
receipt of cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. For more information, please see the section of this
proxy statement under the caption Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences. |
|
|
|
Tax matters are complicated and the tax consequences of the
transaction to you will depend upon the facts of your particular
circumstances. Because individual circumstances may differ,
Validus urges you to consult with your own tax advisor as to the
specific tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement and
short-form amalgamation to you, including the applicability of
U.S. federal, state, local,
non-U.S. and
other tax laws. |
-7-
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can I contact with any additional questions? |
|
|
|
If you have additional questions about the Acquisition, if you
would like additional copies of this proxy statement, or if you
need assistance voting your IPC Shares, you should contact
Georgeson Inc. at: |
|
|
|
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call:
(212) 440-9800
All Others Call Toll Free: at
(888) 274-5119
Email: validusIPC@georgeson.com |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about the companies? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
You can find more information about Validus and IPC in the
documents described under Where You Can Find More Information
on page [ ]. |
-8-
SUMMARY
This summary highlights the material information in this
proxy statement. To fully understand the Scheme of Arrangement,
and for a more complete description of the terms of the
Acquisition, you should read carefully this entire document,
including the annexes and documents incorporated by reference
herein, and the other documents referred to herein. For
information on how to obtain the documents that are on file with
the SEC, see Where You Can Find More Information on
page [ ].
Validus
(page [ ])
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company, with its principal
executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is
(441) 278-9000.
Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting
its operations worldwide through two wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. (Validus Re) and Talbot
Holdings Ltd. (Talbot). Validus Re is a
Bermuda-based reinsurer focused on short-tail lines of
reinsurance. Talbot is the Bermuda parent of the specialty
insurance group primarily operating within the Lloyds
Insurance market through Syndicate 1183. At March 31, 2009,
Validus had total shareholders equity of
$2.023 billion and total assets of $4.763 billion.
Validus Shares are traded on the NYSE under the symbol
VR and, as of June 22, 2009, the last
practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement,
Validus had a market capitalization of approximately
$1.59 billion. Validus has approximately 280 employees.
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to IPC
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100 IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and
Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
Information for the director and executive officers of Validus
and its subsidiaries who are considered to be participants in
this proxy solicitation and certain other information is set
forth in Schedule I hereto. Other than as set forth herein,
none of Validus, or any of the participants set forth on
Schedule I hereto have any interest, direct or indirect, by
security holdings or otherwise, in the Acquisition.
IPC
(page [ ])
The following description of IPC is taken from the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed by IPC with the SEC in connection with the amalgamation of
Max and IPC proposed under the Max Amalgamation Agreement (the
Proposed Max Amalgamation) (as amended from time to
time, the IPC/Max
S-4).
See Sources of Additional Information above.
IPC, a Bermuda exempted company, provides property catastrophe
reinsurance and, to a limited extent,
property-per-risk
excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93%
of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property
catastrophe reinsurance covers against unpredictable events such
as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods
and other man-made or natural disasters. The substantial
majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe, IPCs
Bermuda-based property catastrophe reinsurance subsidiary, has
been, and continues to be, written on an excess of loss basis
for primary insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject to
aggregate limits on exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had
approximately 258 clients from whom it received either
annual/deposit or adjustment premiums, including many of the
leading insurance companies around the world. In 2008,
approximately 36% of those clients were based in the United
States, and approximately 53% of gross premiums written,
excluding reinstatement premiums, related primarily to
U.S. risks. IPCs
non-U.S. clients
and its
non-U.S. covered
risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and
New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for
more than 3.7% of its gross premiums written, excluding
reinstatement premiums. IPC did not disclose gross premiums
written by class of business in its Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Therefore,
comparable disclosure of property catastrophe premiums cannot be
presented. At March 31, 2009, IPC had total
shareholders equity of $1.849 billion and total
assets of $2.453 billion.
-9-
IPC Shares are quoted on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol
IPCR and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol
IPCR BH. IPCs principal executive offices are
located at American International Building, 29 Richmond Road,
Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda and its telephone number is
(441) 298-5100.
The
Court-Ordered IPC Meeting
(page [ ])
The court-ordered IPC meeting is being held in accordance with
an order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued on
[ ], 2009, to give the IPC shareholders the
opportunity to consider and, if they so determine, approve the
Scheme of Arrangement. The record date for determining the IPC
shareholders who will be entitled to vote at the court-ordered
IPC meeting is [ ], 2009. The Scheme of
Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the
holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value
of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy. The court-ordered IPC meeting
will be held on [ ], 2009, at
[ ], Atlantic time, at [ ].
The holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries will not be entitled to vote those
shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
The
Acquisition (page [ ])
General
Description (page [ ])
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, Validus will
effect the Acquisition by the transfer of all outstanding IPC
Shares (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries) to Validus in exchange for the Validus
Transaction Consideration for each IPC Share. IPC would thereby
become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus.
Based on Validus and IPCs respective capitalizations
as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234,
Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the
aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the Validus Shares on a
fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition. The
Scheme of Arrangement is attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement. You should read the Scheme of Arrangement in its
entirety because it, and not this proxy statement or
Validus proxy statement for the IPC special general
meeting, is the legal document that would govern the Acquisition.
Following the Acquisition, as part of an overall plan, Validus
intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between IPC and
another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to
Section 107 of the Companies Act. Following the short-form
amalgamation, IPC and the Validus subsidiary would continue as
one amalgamated company in accordance with the Companies Act.
Completing
the Acquisition
In order to consummate the Acquisition without the cooperation
of the current IPC board of directors, Validus is pursuing a
three-part plan.
First, Validus solicited proxies from IPC shareholders to vote
against the Proposed Max Amalgamation, which was voted down by
IPC shareholders on June 12, 2009. Maxs board of
directors subsequently terminated the Max Amalgamation
Agreement. Accordingly, IPCs board of directors is now
free to enter into an amalgamation agreement with Validus. While
Validus continues to seek a consensual amalgamation with IPC, it
is continuing to pursue alternatives to complete the Acquisition.
Second, Validus has commenced the Exchange Offer. The Exchange
Offer is subject to the terms and conditions described in the
prospectus/offer to exchange included in the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed by Validus with the SEC. Under Bermuda law, if Validus
acquires at least 90% of the IPC Shares which it is seeking to
acquire in the Exchange Offer, Validus will have the right to
acquire the remaining IPC Shares on the same terms in a
second-step acquisition. The Chairman of IPCs board of
directors sent a letter to Validus which stated that IPCs
restated bye-laws (the IPC bye-laws) would prevent
Validus from becoming the legal owner of 10% or more of the IPC
Shares. Validus believes, based upon the advice of Bermuda and
UK counsel, that the IPC bye-laws will not operate to prevent
Validus from accepting IPC Shares for exchange in the Exchange
Offer and acquiring beneficial ownership of any such IPC Shares.
IPC has stated in a letter to its shareholders that IPC believes
that
-10-
Validus faces substantial legal uncertainties if it attempts to
squeeze out IPCs remaining shareholders on such basis.
Validus will take such actions as are necessary, including by
seeking a judgment of a Bermuda court, to enforce its rights
under Section 102
and/or
Section 103 of the Companies Act to the extent that any
person (including IPC, IPCs board of directors or any IPC
shareholder) seeks to restrict the operation thereof. However,
resolution of any such actions or proceedings is not a condition
to the Exchange Offer and there can be no certainty as to the
outcome of any such actions or proceedings.
The expiration time of the Exchange Offer is June 26, 2009,
unless extended. As a result, if the conditions of the Exchange
Offer are satisfied or waived at the expiration time of the
Exchange Offer, Validus would be able to acquire all of the IPC
Shares that are validly tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
Third, Validus is pursuing the Scheme of Arrangement. In order
to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, IPC shareholders must
approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement,
the IPC shareholders must approve the Validus Proposals and the
Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda. For a description of the Validus Proposals, see
Proposals to be Submitted to IPC Shareholder Vote at the IPC
Special General Meeting; Voting Requirements and Recommendation
in Validus proxy statement for the IPC special general
meeting. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of
Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate
approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by
either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying
with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC
approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting. On
June 16, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a definitive
proxy statement which is being used to solicit written
requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board
of directors to call the IPC special general meeting. Following
IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC meeting
and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction or, where
relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of a court order
from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of
Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be
effective. In a decision rendered on May 29, 2009, the Supreme
Court of Bermuda dismissed Validus application to convene
a meeting of IPC shareholders to consider the Scheme of
Arrangement but determined that it has jurisdiction to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement without approval of the IPC board of
directors. However, the Court determined not to exercise its
discretion to order the court-ordered IPC meeting in advance of
the vote on the Proposed Max Amalgamation at the IPC annual
general meeting and evidence of IPC shareholder support for the
Scheme of Arrangement and there can be no assurance that the
Court will on a subsequent application by Validus exercise its
discretion to convene such a meeting.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to
acquire all of the IPC Shares on the same economic terms.
Ultimately, only one of these transaction structures can be
pursued to completion. Validus will determine which method is
most effective and efficient to consummate the Acquisition.
However, if the IPC board of directors cooperates with Validus
and executes an amalgamation agreement with Validus, the
court-ordered IPC meeting may be unnecessary and may not be
held. While Validus continues to seek a consensual amalgamation
transaction with IPC, we will continue to pursue the Scheme of
Arrangement and Exchange Offer in order to complete the
Acquisition and will seek to replace the IPC board of directors
if an agreement with the IPC board of directors is not reached
in a timely fashion.
Reasons
to Vote FOR the Scheme of Arrangement
(page [ ])
Validus recommends approval of the Scheme of Arrangement in
order to enable the consummation of the Acquisition. Validus
believes that the Acquisition represents a compelling
combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable Validus
to capitalize on opportunities in the global reinsurance market.
Successful completion of the Acquisition would allow IPC
shareholders to benefit from the superior growth potential of a
combined company that would be a leading carrier in
Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets,
with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification in
profitable business lines. The Validus Shares to be issued and
cash to be paid to IPC shareholders pursuant to the Scheme of
Arrangement will provide IPC shareholders with an immediate
premium for their shares, and will allow IPC shareholders to
participate in the growth and opportunities of Validus following
the Acquisition.
-11-
In reaching these conclusions Validus board of directors
consulted with Validus management as well as legal and financial
advisors and considered a number of factors. Those factors
included, but were not limited to, those set forth under The
Acquisition Reasons to Vote FOR the
Scheme of Arrangement below.
Interests
of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition
(page [ ])
The consummation of the Acquisition would not be deemed to be a
change in control impacting grants under any of Validus
long-term incentive or stock option plans, or a change in
control under any employment agreement between Validus and any
of its employees. As a result, no options or other equity grants
held by such persons will vest as a result of the Acquisition.
Pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, upon the effective time
all of Validus current directors and officers will
continue as the directors and officers of Validus. For more
information, see The Acquisition Interests of
Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition
below.
Interests
of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition
(page [ ])
The consummation of the Acquisition would likely be deemed to be
a change in control under the existing employment agreements of
certain executive officers of IPC. In addition, IPC shareholders
should be aware that James P. Bryce, John R. Weale, Peter J. A.
Cozens, and Stephen F. Fallon, individually, and all the members
of IPCs board of directors as a group, have interests in
the Acquisition that are different from,
and/or in
addition to, the interests of IPC shareholders generally. For
more information, see The Acquisition Interests
of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the Acquisition
below.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
(page [ ])
Following the Scheme of Arrangement, as part of an overall plan,
Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between
IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to
Section 107 of the Companies Act. The Scheme of Arrangement
and subsequent short-form amalgamation are intended to
constitute a single integrated transaction that qualifies as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code. Assuming it does so qualify, U.S. holders of IPC
Shares will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount
equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of the cash received
by such U.S. holder (excluding any cash received in lieu of
a fractional share) and (ii) the excess, if any, of
(a) the sum of the cash and the fair market value of the
Validus Shares received by such U.S. holder (including any
fractional shares deemed received by such U.S. holder),
over (b) the U.S. holders tax basis in the IPC
Shares exchanged pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement. Subject
to the passive foreign investment company rules or the potential
application of Section 1248 of the Code, any gain
recognized upon the Scheme of Arrangement generally will be
capital gain, unless the receipt of cash by a U.S. holder has
the effect of a distribution of a dividend for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. For more information, please see the
section of this proxy statement under the caption Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax consequences.
Tax matters are complicated and the tax consequences of the
transaction to you will depend upon the facts of your particular
circumstances. Because individual circumstances may differ,
Validus urges you to consult with your own tax advisor as to the
specific tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement and
short-form amalgamation to you, including the applicability of
U.S. federal, state, local,
non-U.S. and
other tax laws.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
(page [ ])
The Acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 141R,
Business Combinations, (FAS 141(R))
under which the total consideration paid in the Acquisition will
be allocated among acquired tangible and intangible assets and
assumed liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event
there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition over the fair values, the excess will be accounted
for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting
from the Acquisition will not be amortized but instead will be
tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if
certain indicators are present). In the event that management of
Validus determines that the value of goodwill has become
impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal
quarter in which such
-12-
determination is made. In the event there is an excess of the
fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed over
the total consideration paid in the Acquisition, the excess will
be accounted for as a gain to be recognized through the income
statement at the consummation of the Acquisition in accordance
with FAS 141(R). Validus anticipates the Scheme of
Arrangement will result in an excess of the fair values of the
acquired assets and liabilities assumed over the total
consideration paid.
The
Scheme of Arrangement
(page [ ])
The form of Scheme of Arrangement is attached as Annex A
to this proxy statement. You should read that document in its
entirety because it, and not this proxy statement or
Validus proxy statement for the IPC special general
meeting, is the legal document that would govern the Scheme of
Arrangement.
Purpose;
Effective Time (page [ ])
The Supreme Court of Bermuda ordered the court-ordered IPC
meeting to be held to give the IPC shareholders (other than the
holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries) the opportunity to consider and, if
they so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. Assuming
the Scheme of Arrangement receives the approval of the IPC
shareholders and the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda,
and all the other conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme
of Arrangement are satisfied or, where relevant, waived,
including approval of the Scheme of Arrangement by IPC either by
vote of the IPC board of directors or a vote of IPC shareholders
at the IPC special general meeting, an office copy of the court
order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to
the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of
Arrangement will be effective.
Implementing
the Scheme of Arrangement
(page [ ])
The steps involved in the Scheme of Arrangement are as follows:
(1) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an order
giving directions for the holding and conduct of the
court-ordered IPC meeting.
(2) Requisitioning the IPC special general meeting. On June
16, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a definitive proxy
statement which is being used to solicit written requisitions
from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors
to call the IPC special general meeting.
(3) Holding the court-ordered IPC meeting to which this
proxy statement relates to consider and, if the IPC shareholders
so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of
Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the
holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value
of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy.
(4) Holding the IPC special general meeting to approve
resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in
connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement.
Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by
proxy.
(5) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement.
(6) Delivering a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of
Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda
Registrar of Companies.
Validus
Transaction Consideration
(page [ ])
Under the Scheme of Arrangement, at the closing, each IPC Share
immediately prior to the closing (excluding any IPC Shares owned
by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) will be
transferred to Validus in exchange for (i) 1.1234 Validus
Shares and (ii) $3.75 in cash (less any applicable
withholding taxes and without interest).
-13-
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the Acquisition. Instead, any IPC shareholder
who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
Validus Share in connection with the Acquisition will receive
cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) in an amount (without
interest) equal to the product obtained by multiplying (i) the
fractional share interest to which such shareholder would
otherwise be entitled (after aggregating all fractional Validus
Shares that would otherwise be received by such shareholder) by
(ii) the closing price of Validus Shares as reported on the NYSE
on the last trading day immediately prior to the closing of the
Acquisition.
Amendment
and Termination of the Scheme of Arrangement
(page [ ])
The Scheme of Arrangement contains a provision for Validus to
consent, on behalf of all persons concerned, to any modification
of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to
the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that the Supreme
Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. If there is any
modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any
condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that
is material to the interests of IPC shareholders, Validus will
amend this proxy statement and advise the IPC shareholders of
such modification, addition or condition in advance of the
court-ordered IPC meeting, in accordance with applicable law.
Prior to approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered
IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at
any time. Following approval by the IPC shareholders at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of
Arrangement at any time prior to commencement of the hearing of
the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of
Arrangement without obtaining the approval of the IPC
shareholders if any event or condition occurs which would cause
any of the conditions to its effectiveness not to be satisfied
by November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as
Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow).
Conditions
to the Scheme of Arrangement
(page [ ])
In addition to the requisite approval by IPC shareholders at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, the approval by IPC shareholders at
the IPC special general meeting of resolutions determined by
Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with
implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, the sanction of the
Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the
filing of a copy of the court sanction order with the Bermuda
Registrar of Companies, the effectiveness of the Scheme of
Arrangement is subject to the satisfaction or, where relevant,
waiver of certain other conditions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not have any
liability with respect to the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, and Max shall not have asserted any
claim of liability or breach against IPC in connection with the
Max Amalgamation Agreement, in each case, other than with
respect to the possible payment of the Max Termination Fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the issuance of
the Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement as
required under the rules of the NYSE. All of the Validus
officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus refers
to as its qualified sponsors (as defined in this
proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have
indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares
beneficially owned by them in favor of such approval. As of
April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially
owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus
Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders pursuant to
the Scheme of Arrangement shall have been authorized for listing
on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
|
|
|
|
There shall be no threatened or pending litigation, suit, claim,
action, proceeding or investigation before any governmental
authority that, in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely
to, directly or indirectly, restrain or prohibit (or which
alleges a violation of law in connection with) the Scheme of
Arrangement or is reasonably likely to prohibit or limit the
full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its
affiliates.
|
-14-
|
|
|
|
|
Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have been any
material adverse effect on IPC and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole. A more than 50% decline in IPCs book value or a
more than 20% decline in IPCs book value relative to
Validus book value shall be deemed to have a material
adverse effect on IPC.
|
|
|
|
Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried on their
respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice at all times on or after the date of this proxy
statement and prior to the commencement of the hearing of the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
|
|
|
|
All amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities
necessary to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement and the other
transactions contemplated by this proxy statement shall be in
full force and effect.
|
The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to additional conditions
referred to below in The Scheme of Arrangement
Conditions to the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of
Arrangement is not conditioned on the receipt of regulatory
approvals or the elimination of the Max Termination Fee. The
conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement are
for the sole benefit of Validus and, other than the
Procedural Conditions, the Registration
Condition, the Shareholder Approval Condition
and the NYSE Listing Condition described below in
The Scheme of Arrangement Conditions to the
Scheme of Arrangement, may be waived by Validus prior to the
commencement of the hearing of the Supreme Court of Bermuda to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement in its discretion.
Dividends
and Distributions (page [ ])
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash
dividend, i.e., $0.20 per common share in Validus
case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs case. Validus
expects to continue to pay its regular quarterly dividends
consistent with past practice. It is a condition to the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that IPC shall not
have declared, paid or proposed to declare or pay any dividend
or other distribution on any share capital of IPC other than
(i) any quarterly cash dividends paid in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice to holders of
IPC Shares and (ii) a
one-time
dividend to the holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not
to exceed any reduction in the Max Termination Fee. All mandates
and other instructions in force at the effective time in
relation to the IPC Shares (including elections for payment of
dividends (if any)) will, immediately after the effective time,
be deemed to be valid as effective mandates or instructions in
respect of the Validus Shares received in consideration of such
IPC Shares.
Dissenters
and Appraisal Rights of IPC Shareholders
(page [ ])
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will be
binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they voted in
favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC
meeting or of the resolutions proposed at the IPC special
general meeting, and IPC shareholders will not be entitled to
exercise any appraisal rights. IPC shareholders will be entitled
to be present and be heard at the Supreme Court of Bermuda
hearing to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement. Any IPC
shareholder who wishes to may oppose the sanctioning of the
Scheme of Arrangement and may make presentations to the court on
the hearing of the petition. IPC shareholders will be notified
of the date of the Supreme Court of Bermuda hearing to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement once it is set. IPC shareholders may
also vote against the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered
IPC meeting.
-15-
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF VALIDUS
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to Validus. The financial data has been
derived from Validus quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the
Validus
10-Q)
and Validus annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Validus
10-K).
You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any future period.
This financial data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes and other financial
information contained in the Validus
10-K and the
Validus
10-Q, each
of which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
More comprehensive financial information, including
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, is contained in the
Validus 10-K
and the
Validus 10-Q,
and the following summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Validus
10-K and the
Validus 10-Q
and all of the financial information and notes contained
therein. See Where You Can Find More Information on
page [ ].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
609,892
|
|
|
$
|
521,594
|
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
988,637
|
|
|
$
|
540,789
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(72,512
|
)
|
|
|
(84,900
|
)
|
|
|
(124,160
|
)
|
|
|
(70,210
|
)
|
|
|
(63,696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
537,380
|
|
|
|
436,694
|
|
|
|
1,238,324
|
|
|
|
918,427
|
|
|
|
477,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
(218,621
|
)
|
|
|
(144,830
|
)
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
(60,348
|
)
|
|
|
(170,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
318,759
|
|
|
|
291,864
|
|
|
|
1,256,518
|
|
|
|
858,079
|
|
|
|
306,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
26,772
|
|
|
|
36,043
|
|
|
|
139,528
|
|
|
|
112,324
|
|
|
|
58,021
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
(23,421
|
)
|
|
|
7,744
|
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Net unrealized gains on investments(2)
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
(14,977
|
)
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
|
|
12,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
8,179
|
|
|
|
(49,397
|
)
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
340,820
|
|
|
|
329,788
|
|
|
|
1,279,367
|
|
|
|
994,372
|
|
|
|
365,590
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
131,834
|
|
|
|
140,024
|
|
|
|
772,154
|
|
|
|
283,993
|
|
|
|
91,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
61,449
|
|
|
|
56,701
|
|
|
|
234,951
|
|
|
|
134,277
|
|
|
|
36,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
38,079
|
|
|
|
37,107
|
|
|
|
123,948
|
|
|
|
100,765
|
|
|
|
38,354
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Share compensation expenses
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
|
|
21,517
|
|
|
|
57,318
|
|
|
|
51,754
|
|
|
|
8,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
49,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
246,439
|
|
|
|
261,884
|
|
|
|
1,215,468
|
|
|
|
589,871
|
|
|
|
182,493
|
|
|
|
51,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before taxes
|
|
|
94,381
|
|
|
|
67,904
|
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
404,501
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
(49,708
|
)
|
Taxes
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
94,907
|
|
|
|
66,475
|
|
|
|
53,111
|
|
|
|
402,996
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
(49,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains arising during the period(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(7,809
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for reclassification of losses realized in income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
94,711
|
|
|
$
|
66,542
|
|
|
$
|
45,302
|
|
|
$
|
402,947
|
|
|
$
|
183,867
|
|
|
$
|
(49,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
75,744,577
|
|
|
|
74,209,371
|
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
65,068,093
|
|
|
|
58,477,130
|
|
|
|
58,423,174
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
79,102,643
|
|
|
|
78,329,727
|
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
67,786,673
|
|
|
|
58,874,567
|
|
|
|
58,423,174
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-16-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Selected financial ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses ratio(4)
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Policy acquisition cost ratio(5)
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense ratio(6)
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio(7)
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio(8)
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
82.4
|
%
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized return on average equity(9)
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet data as
of March 31, 2009 and 2008, and as of December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,926,859
|
|
|
$
|
2,893,595
|
|
|
$
|
2,831,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,662,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,376,387
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
535,798
|
|
|
|
347,347
|
|
|
|
449,848
|
|
|
|
444,698
|
|
|
|
63,643
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,762,798
|
|
|
|
4,535,638
|
|
|
|
4,322,480
|
|
|
|
4,144,224
|
|
|
|
1,646,423
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
1,318,732
|
|
|
|
977,236
|
|
|
|
1,305,303
|
|
|
|
926,117
|
|
|
|
77,363
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
795,233
|
|
|
|
750,257
|
|
|
|
539,450
|
|
|
|
557,344
|
|
|
|
178,824
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable debentures
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,739,812
|
|
|
|
2,544,980
|
|
|
|
2,383,746
|
|
|
|
2,209,424
|
|
|
|
453,900
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
|
1,990,658
|
|
|
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
|
1,934,800
|
|
|
|
1,192,523
|
|
Book value per common share(10)
|
|
|
26.68
|
|
|
|
26.82
|
|
|
|
25.64
|
|
|
|
26.08
|
|
|
|
20.39
|
|
Diluted book value per common share(11)
|
|
|
24.65
|
|
|
|
24.43
|
|
|
|
23.78
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
19.73
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
General and administrative expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 include $4,000,000 and
$1,000,000 respectively, related to our advisory agreement with
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, which, together with its related
companies, we refer to as Aquiline. Our advisory
agreement with Aquiline terminated upon completion of our
initial public offering, in connection with which Validus
recorded general and administrative expense of $3,000,000 in the
year ended December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Validus adopted FAS 157 and FAS 159 as of
January 1, 2007 and elected the fair value option on all
securities previously accounted for as available-for-sale.
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments at
December 31, 2006 of $875,000, previously included in
accumulated other comprehensive income, were treated as a
cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2007. The
cumulative-effect adjustment transferred the balance of
unrealized gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive
income to retained earnings and had no impact on the results of
operations for the annual or interim periods beginning
January 1, 2007. Validus investments were accounted
for as trading for the annual or interim periods beginning
January 1, 2007 and as such all unrealized gains and losses
are included in net income. |
|
(3) |
|
FAS 123(R) requires that any unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense that will be recorded in future periods be
included as proceeds for purposes of treasury stock repurchases,
which is applied against the unvested restricted shares balance.
On March 1, 2007 we effected a 1.75 for 1 reverse stock
split of our outstanding common shares. The stock split does not
affect our financial statements other than to the extent it
decreases the number of outstanding shares and correspondingly
increases per share information for all periods presented. The
share consolidation has been reflected retroactively in these
financial statements. |
-17-
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The losses and loss expense ratio is calculated by dividing
losses and loss expenses by net premiums earned. |
|
(5) |
|
The policy acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing
policy acquisition costs by net premiums earned. |
|
(6) |
|
The general and administrative expense ratio is calculated by
dividing the sum of general and administrative expenses and
share compensation expenses by net premiums earned. The general
and administrative expense ratio for the year ended
December 31, 2007 is calculated by dividing the total of
general and administrative expenses plus share compensation
expenses less the $3,000,000 termination fee payable to Aquiline
by net premiums earned. |
|
(7) |
|
The expense ratio is calculated by combining the policy
acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative
expense ratio. |
|
(8) |
|
The combined ratio is calculated by combining the losses and
loss expense ratio, the policy acquisition cost ratio and the
general and administrative expense ratio. |
|
(9) |
|
Annualized return on average equity is calculated by dividing
the net income for the period by the average shareholders
equity during the period. Annual average shareholders
equity is the average of the beginning, ending and intervening
quarter-end shareholders equity balances. |
|
(10) |
|
Book value per common share is defined as total
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding as at the end of the period, giving no effect to
dilutive securities. |
|
(11) |
|
Diluted book value per common share is calculated based on total
shareholders equity plus the assumed proceeds from the
exercise of outstanding options and warrants, divided by the sum
of common shares, unvested restricted shares, options and
warrants outstanding (assuming their exercise). Diluted book
value per common share is a Non-GAAP financial measure as
described under Item 7, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial condition and Results of
Operations Financial Measures, in the Validus
Form 10-K. |
-18-
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF IPC
The following disclosure is taken from IPCs quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the
IPC 10-Q) and
IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
IPC 10-K),
except in respect of diluted book value per common share (as
discussed in footnote 5 below). See Sources of Additional
Information above.
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to IPC. The financial data has been
derived from the
IPC 10-Q,
which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement,
and the
IPC 10-K,
which is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any future period.
This financial data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes and other financial
information contained in the IPC
10-K and the
IPC 10-Q,
each of which is incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement. More comprehensive financial information, including
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, is contained in other
documents filed by IPC with the SEC, and the following summary
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such other
documents and all of the financial information and notes
contained in those documents. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page [ ].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
234,610
|
|
|
$
|
197,875
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
404,096
|
|
|
$
|
429,851
|
|
|
$
|
472,387
|
|
|
$
|
378,409
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
98,708
|
|
|
|
89,697
|
|
|
|
387,367
|
|
|
|
391,385
|
|
|
|
397,132
|
|
|
|
452,522
|
|
|
|
354,882
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
23,874
|
|
|
|
94,105
|
|
|
|
121,842
|
|
|
|
109,659
|
|
|
|
71,757
|
|
|
|
51,220
|
|
Net (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(35,572
|
)
|
|
|
(6,020
|
)
|
|
|
(168,208
|
)
|
|
|
67,555
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
|
|
(10,556
|
)
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
39,109
|
|
|
|
5,324
|
|
|
|
155,632
|
|
|
|
124,923
|
|
|
|
58,505
|
|
|
|
1,072,662
|
|
|
|
215,608
|
|
Net acquisition costs
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
|
|
8,674
|
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
|
|
39,856
|
|
|
|
37,542
|
|
|
|
39,249
|
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
24,281
|
|
|
|
7,079
|
|
|
|
26,314
|
|
|
|
30,510
|
|
|
|
34,436
|
|
|
|
27,466
|
|
|
|
23,151
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
86,803
|
|
|
$
|
90,447
|
|
|
$
|
385,412
|
|
|
$
|
394,585
|
|
|
$
|
(623,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
138,613
|
|
Preferred dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,234
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
17,128
|
|
|
|
17,176
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
82,569
|
|
|
$
|
75,508
|
|
|
$
|
368,284
|
|
|
$
|
377,409
|
|
|
$
|
(626,063
|
)
|
|
$
|
138,613
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
$
|
5.54
|
|
|
$
|
(12.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.87
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
55,916,256
|
|
|
|
66,182,883
|
|
|
|
59,301,939
|
|
|
|
69,728,229
|
|
|
|
71,212,287
|
|
|
|
50,901,296
|
|
|
|
48,376,865
|
|
Cash dividend per common share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio(2)
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
237.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
Expense ratio(2)
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Combined ratio(2)
|
|
|
74.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
251.8
|
%
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
Return on average equity(3)
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and investments
|
|
$
|
2,189,966
|
|
|
$
|
2,475,860
|
|
|
$
|
2,235,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,473,244
|
|
|
$
|
2,485,525
|
|
|
$
|
2,560,146
|
|
|
$
|
1,901,094
|
|
Reinsurance premiums receivable
|
|
|
199,241
|
|
|
|
161,474
|
|
|
|
108,033
|
|
|
|
91,393
|
|
|
|
113,811
|
|
|
|
180,798
|
|
|
|
85,086
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,453,085
|
|
|
|
2,712,037
|
|
|
|
2,388,688
|
|
|
|
2,627,691
|
|
|
|
2,645,429
|
|
|
|
2,778,281
|
|
|
|
2,028,290
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
354,467
|
|
|
|
355,276
|
|
|
|
355,893
|
|
|
|
395,245
|
|
|
|
548,627
|
|
|
|
1,072,056
|
|
|
|
274,463
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
219,641
|
|
|
|
181,889
|
|
|
|
85,473
|
|
|
|
75,980
|
|
|
|
80,043
|
|
|
|
66,311
|
|
|
|
68,465
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
603,611
|
|
|
|
563,904
|
|
|
|
537,741
|
|
|
|
501,946
|
|
|
|
654,474
|
|
|
|
1,161,881
|
|
|
|
359,851
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,849,474
|
|
|
$
|
2,148,133
|
|
|
$
|
1,850,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,125,745
|
|
|
$
|
1,990,955
|
|
|
$
|
1,616,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,668,439
|
|
Diluted book value per common share(4)
|
|
$
|
33.05
|
|
|
$
|
33.26
|
|
|
$
|
32.85
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
$
|
27.94
|
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
|
$
|
34.44
|
|
-19-
NA Not available
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per common share is calculated upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant
year. The weighted average number of shares includes common
shares and the dilutive effect of employee stock options and
stock grants, using the treasury stock method and convertible
preferred shares. The net loss per common share for the year
ended December 31, 2005 is calculated on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding
the anti-dilutive effect of employee stock options, stock grants
and convertible preferred shares. The net income per common
share for the year ended December 31, 2008 is calculated on
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
year, excluding the anti-dilutive effect of stock-based
compensation and convertible preferred shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is calculated by
dividing the net losses and loss expenses incurred by the net
premiums earned. The expense ratio is calculated by dividing the
sum of acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses
by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the
loss and loss expense ratio and the expense ratio. |
|
(3) |
|
Return on average equity is calculated as the annual net income
(loss), available to common shareholders divided by the average
of the common shareholders equity, which is total
shareholders equity, excluding convertible preferred
shares, on the first and last day of the respective year. |
|
(4) |
|
Diluted book value per common share is calculated as
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding on the balance sheet date, after considering the
dilutive effects of stock-based compensation, calculated using
the treasury stock method. At December 31, 2008 the average
weighted number of shares outstanding, including the dilutive
effect of employee stock-based compensation and convertible
preferred shares (which were converted on November 15,
2008) using the treasury stock method was 59,301,939. |
|
(5) |
|
IPC reported diluted book value per common share as $33.07 in
IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and amended it to
$32.85 in an amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4 filed
with the SEC on April 13, 2009. |
-20-
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information is intended to provide you with
information about how the acquisition of IPC might have affected
the historical financial statements of Validus if it had been
consummated at an earlier time. The unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma information has been prepared using
IPCs publicly available financial statements and
disclosures, without the benefit of inspection of IPCs
books and records. Therefore, certain pro forma adjustments,
such as recording fair value of assets and liabilities and
adjustments for consistency of accounting policy, are not
reflected in these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial statements. The following unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information does not
necessarily reflect the financial position or results of
operations that would have actually resulted had the acquisition
occurred as of the dates indicated, nor should they be taken as
necessarily indicative of the future financial position or
results of operations of Validus.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Validus
10-Q, the
Validus
10-K, the
IPC 10-Q and
the IPC
10-K, each
as filed with the SEC. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma financial information gives effect to the proposed
acquisition as if it had occurred at March 31, 2009 for the
purposes of the unaudited consolidated pro forma balance sheet
and at January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma statements of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009. For a summary of the proposed business
combination contemplated by the Acquisition, see the section of
this proxy statement entitled The Acquisition.
-21-
The following table presents unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma balance sheet data at March 31, 2009 (expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data) giving effect to the proposed acquisition of IPC Shares as
if it had occurred at March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,644,496
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,805
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,417,301
|
|
Short-term investments, at fair value
|
|
|
282,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,363
|
|
Equity investments, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,091
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
535,798
|
|
|
|
122,070
|
|
|
|
(288,084
|
)
|
|
3(a) 3(b), 4
|
|
|
369,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and cash
|
|
|
3,462,657
|
|
|
|
2,189,966
|
|
|
|
(288,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
5,364,539
|
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
600,943
|
|
|
|
199,241
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
800,024
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
143,510
|
|
|
|
23,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,812
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
59,510
|
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
62,896
|
|
Securities lending collateral
|
|
|
99,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,727
|
|
Loss reserves recoverable
|
|
|
204,197
|
|
|
|
4,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,471
|
|
Paid losses recoverable
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
|
|
27,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,418
|
|
Current taxes recoverable
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
126,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,177
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,491
|
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,762,798
|
|
|
$
|
2,453,085
|
|
|
$
|
(288,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,927,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
$
|
795,233
|
|
|
$
|
219,641
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
$
|
1,014,675
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expense
|
|
|
1,318,732
|
|
|
|
354,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,673,199
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
66,180
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
70,503
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
20,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,914
|
|
Securities lending payable
|
|
|
105,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,369
|
|
Net payable for investments purchased
|
|
|
57,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,434
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
71,650
|
|
|
|
25,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,670
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,739,812
|
|
|
|
603,611
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
3,343,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
13,271
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
10,547
|
|
|
3(a) 3(c) 3(d)
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,419,602
|
|
|
|
1,091,491
|
|
|
|
418,254
|
|
|
3(a) 3(c) 3(d)
|
|
|
2,929,347
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(8,054
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
3(d)
|
|
|
(8,054
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
598,167
|
|
|
|
758,298
|
|
|
|
(717,761
|
)
|
|
3(b) 3(d) 3(f)
|
|
|
638,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
|
1,849,474
|
|
|
|
(288,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
3,584,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,762,798
|
|
|
$
|
2,453,085
|
|
|
$
|
(288,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,927,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
75,828,922
|
|
|
|
55,948,821
|
|
|
|
62,857,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,686,530
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
90,317,793
|
|
|
|
57,008,096
|
|
|
|
64,047,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,365,390
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
26.68
|
|
|
$
|
33.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
$
|
25.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per share
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
32.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
23.03
|
|
|
$
|
32.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-22-
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2008 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share
and per share data) giving effect to the proposed acquisition of
IPC Shares as if it had occurred at January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
3(e), 5
|
|
$
|
1,765,628
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(124,160
|
)
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
(130,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
1,238,324
|
|
|
|
397,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635,597
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
(9,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
1,256,518
|
|
|
|
387,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,643,885
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
139,528
|
|
|
|
94,105
|
|
|
|
(11,321
|
)
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
222,312
|
|
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
(168,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,799
|
)
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
Foreign exchange losses
|
|
|
(49,397
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,279,367
|
|
|
|
311,481
|
|
|
|
(11,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
1,579,527
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense
|
|
|
772,154
|
|
|
|
155,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
927,786
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
234,951
|
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,380
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
123,948
|
|
|
|
20,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,637
|
|
Share compensation expense
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,722
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
57,318
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,215,468
|
|
|
|
221,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,436,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
90,447
|
|
|
|
(11,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
143,025
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes
|
|
$
|
53,111
|
|
|
$
|
90,447
|
|
|
$
|
(11,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
132,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
(14,939
|
)
|
|
3(g)
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
46,164
|
|
|
$
|
75,508
|
|
|
$
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
52,124,034
|
|
|
|
62,858,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,536,627
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
59,301,939
|
|
|
|
63,475,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,295,193
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-23-
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 (expressed in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) giving
effect to the proposed acquisition of IPC Shares as if it had
occurred at January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
609,892
|
|
|
$
|
234,610
|
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
3(e), 5
|
|
$
|
844,237
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(72,512
|
)
|
|
|
(3,154
|
)
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
3(e)
|
|
|
(75,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
537,380
|
|
|
|
231,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768,836
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
(218,621
|
)
|
|
|
(132,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(351,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
318,759
|
|
|
|
98,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,467
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
26,772
|
|
|
|
21,866
|
|
|
|
(2,290
|
)
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
46,348
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(23,421
|
)
|
|
|
(35,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,993
|
)
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
(3,146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
340,820
|
|
|
|
81,863
|
|
|
|
(2,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
420,393
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense
|
|
|
131,834
|
|
|
|
39,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
170,943
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
61,449
|
|
|
|
9,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,287
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
38,079
|
|
|
|
21,792
|
|
|
|
(13,800
|
)
|
|
3(b)
|
|
|
46,071
|
|
Share compensation expense
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
7,723
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
246,439
|
|
|
|
73,611
|
|
|
|
(13,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
306,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
94,381
|
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
|
|
11,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,143
|
|
Income tax credit
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income after taxes
|
|
$
|
94,907
|
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
11,510
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
93,171
|
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
|
$
|
11,510
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
75,744,577
|
|
|
|
55,903,740
|
|
|
|
62,857,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,602,185
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
79,102,643
|
|
|
|
55,916,256
|
|
|
|
63,474,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,577,306
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-24-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information gives effect to the Acquisition as if it had
occurred at March 31, 2009 for the purposes of the
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet and at
January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and three months ended
March 31, 2009. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma financial information has been prepared by Validus
management and is based on Validus historical consolidated
financial statements and IPCs historical consolidated
financial statements. Certain amounts from IPCs historical
consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the Validus presentation. The unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial statements have been prepared
using IPCs publicly available financial statements and
disclosures, without the benefit of inspection of IPCs
books and records or discussion with the IPC management team.
Therefore, certain pro forma adjustments, such as recording fair
value of assets and liabilities and adjustments for consistency
of accounting policy, are not reflected in these unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements.
Additional reclassifications of IPC data to conform to the
Validus presentation may also be required.
This unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information is prepared in conformity with US GAAP. The
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet as of
March 31, 2009 and the unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma statements of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31,
2009 have been prepared using the following information:
(a) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of
Validus as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008;
(b) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of
IPC as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008;
(c) Unaudited historical consolidated financial statements
of Validus as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2009;
(d) Unaudited historical consolidated financial statements
of IPC as of March 31, 2009 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2009;
(e) Such other known supplementary information as
considered necessary to reflect the Acquisition in the unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial information.
The pro forma adjustments reflecting the Acquisition of IPC
under the purchase method of accounting are based on certain
estimates and assumptions. The unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma adjustments may be revised as additional information
becomes available. The actual adjustments upon consummation of
the Acquisition and the allocation of the final purchase price
of IPC will depend on a number of factors, including additional
financial information available at such time, changes in values
and changes in IPCs operating results between the date of
preparation of this unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information and the effective date of the Acquisition.
Therefore, it is likely that the actual adjustments will differ
from the pro forma adjustments and it is possible the
differences may be material. Validus management believes
that its assumptions provide a reasonable basis for presenting
all of the significant effects of the transactions contemplated
based on information available to Validus at the time and that
the pro forma adjustments give appropriate effect to those
assumptions and are properly applied in the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information does not include any financial benefits, revenue
enhancements or operating expense efficiencies arising from the
Acquisition. In addition, the unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma financial information does not include any additional
expenses that may result
-25-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
from the Acquisition. Estimated costs of the transaction as well
as the benefit of the negative goodwill have been reflected in
the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheets,
but have not been included on the pro forma income statement due
to their non-recurring nature.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information is not intended to reflect the results of operations
or the financial position that would have resulted had the
Acquisition been effected on the dates indicated and if the
companies had been managed as one entity. The unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial information should be
read in conjunction with the Validus
10-Q, the
Validus
10-K, the
IPC 10-Q and
the IPC
10-K, as
filed with the SEC. See Where You Can Find More
Information on page [ ].
|
|
2.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
and No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51
(FAS 160) which are effective for business
combinations for which the Acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. On April 1, 2009 the FASB
finalized and issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1 which amended and
clarified FAS 141 (R) and is effective for business
combinations whose Acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 has amended FAS 141(R)s
guidance on the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise
from contingencies.
Significant changes arising from FAS 141 (R) and FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 which will impact any future acquisitions
include the determination of the purchase price and treatment of
transaction expenses, restructuring charges and negative
goodwill as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Under FAS 141(R), the purchase
price is determined as of the acquisition date, which is the
date that the acquirer obtains control. Previously, the date the
business combination was announced was used as the effective
date in determining the purchase price;
|
|
|
|
Transactions Expenses Under FAS 141(R), all
costs associated with purchase transactions must be expensed as
incurred. Previously, all such costs could be capitalized and
included as part of transaction purchase price, adding to the
amount of goodwill recognized;
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Costs Under FAS 141(R), expected
restructuring costs are not recorded at the closing date, but
rather after the transaction. The only costs to be included as a
liability at the closing date are those for which an acquirer is
obligated at the time of the closing. Previously, restructuring
costs that were planned to occur after the closing of the
transaction were recognized and recorded at the closing date as
a liability;
|
|
|
|
Negative Goodwill/Bargain Purchases Under
FAS 141(R), where total fair value of net assets acquired
exceeds consideration paid (creating negative
goodwill), the acquirer will record a gain as a result of
the bargain purchase, to be recognized through the income
statement at the close of the transaction. Previously, negative
goodwill was recognized as a pro rata reduction of the assets
assumed to allow the net assets acquired to equal the
consideration paid; and
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests Under FAS 141(R), in a
partial or step acquisition where control is obtained, 100% of
goodwill and identifiable net assets are recognized at fair
value and the noncontrolling (sometimes called minority
interest) interest is also recorded at fair value. Previously,
in a partial acquisition only the controlling interests
share of goodwill was recognized, the controlling
interests share of identifiable net assets was recognized
at fair value and the noncontrolling interests share of
identifiable net assets was
|
-26-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
recognized at carrying value. Under FAS 160, a
noncontrolling interest is now recognized in the equity section,
presented separately from the controlling interests
equity. Previously, noncontrolling interest in general was
recorded in the mezzanine section.
On April 30, 2009, Validus announced a three-part plan to
acquire IPC. The three-part plan, involves (1) the
solicitation by Validus of proxies from IPC shareholders to vote
against the Proposed Max Amalgamation, which was voted down by
IPC shareholders on June 12, 2009, (2) commencing the
Exchange Offer and (3) petitioning the Supreme Court of
Bermuda to approve the Scheme of Arrangement. If the Acquisition
is consummated, former IPC shareholders will no longer have any
ownership interest in IPC and will be shareholders of Validus.
Validus intends, promptly following the Scheme of Arrangement,
to amalgamate IPC with a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary
of Validus in accordance with Section 107 of the Companies
Act.
On June 8, 2009, Validus announced that it delivered an
improved offer to the board of directors of IPC for the
amalgamation of Validus and IPC. Under the improved offer, IPC
shareholders will receive $3.75 in cash and 1.1234 Validus
Shares for each IPC Share.
In connection with the Acquisition, transaction costs currently
estimated at $40,000 will be incurred and expensed. Of this
amount, $20,000 relates to Validus expenses as set forth in
The Acquisition Sources of Funds, Fees and
Expenses and $20,000 is our estimate of IPCs
expenses based on the IPC/Max
S-4. In
addition, upon consummation of the Acquisition, the Max
Termination Fee will be incurred and expensed. The data in the
following sentence is taken from Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations contained in the IPC
10-Q, where
such disclosure was not made in thousands of
U.S. dollars, and the data has been reproduced here
as it was originally presented. Approximately $13.8 million
of expenses, including legal and financial advisory services,
were associated with IPCs strategic initiatives designed
to increase shareholder value and which resulted in the Max
Amalgamation Agreement. Therefore, Validus is estimating that
approximately $13,800 of the estimated $40,000 total transaction
costs have been incurred and expensed by IPC in the three months
ended March 31, 2009.
As discussed above, these pro forma purchase adjustments are
based on certain estimates and assumptions made as of the date
of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information. The actual adjustments will depend on a number of
factors, including changes in the estimated fair value of net
balance sheet assets and operating results of IPC between
March 31, 2009 and the effective date of the Acquisition.
Validus expects to make such adjustments at the effective date
of the Acquisition. These adjustments are likely to be different
from the adjustments made to prepare the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information and such
differences may be material.
-27-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
The share prices for both Validus and IPC used in determining
the preliminary estimated purchase price are based on the
closing share prices on June 5, 2009 (the last trading day
prior to the announcement of the increased offer). The
preliminary total purchase price is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Total Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
IPC Shares outstanding as of May 8, 2009
|
|
|
55,948,821
|
|
IPC Shares issued pursuant to option exercises
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
IPC Shares issued following vesting of restricted shares, RSUs
and PSUs
|
|
|
549,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IPC Shares and share equivalents prior to transaction
|
|
|
56,502,282
|
|
Exchange ratio
|
|
|
1.1234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Validus Shares to be issued
|
|
|
63,474,664
|
|
Validus closing share price on June 5, 2009
|
|
$
|
23.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total value of Validus Shares to be issued
|
|
$
|
1,520,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash consideration paid at $3.75 per IPC share
|
|
$
|
211,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
1,732,737
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
IPC shareholders equity(b)
|
|
$
|
1,849,474
|
|
Total purchase price(a)
|
|
$
|
1,732,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative goodwill (a b)
|
|
$
|
116,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In connection with the Acquisition, 63,474,664 shares are
expected to be issued for all of IPCs common shares,
common shares issued pursuant to option exercises, and common
shares issued following vesting of restricted shares, restricted
share units and performance share units resulting in additional
share capital of $11,108 and Additional Paid-In Capital of
$1,509,745. In addition, cash consideration of $3.75 per IPC
share, or $211,884 in total, is expected to be paid to IPC
shareholders. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
It is expected that total transaction costs currently estimated
at $40,000 and the Max Termination Fee of $50,000 will be
incurred and expensed by the consolidated entity. Based on an
expected investment return of 3.75% per annum, investment
income of $11,321 would have been foregone during the year end
December 31, 2008 had these payments of $301,884 been made. |
|
|
|
|
|
The data in the following sentence is taken from
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in the
IPC 10-Q,
where such disclosure was not made in thousands of
U.S. dollars, and the data has been reproduced here
as it was originally presented. Approximately $13.8 million
of expenses, including legal and financial advisory services,
were associated with IPCs strategic initiatives, designed
to increase shareholder value, and which resulted in the Max
Amalgamation Agreement. Therefore, Validus is estimating that
approximately $13,800 of the estimated $40,000 total transaction
costs have been incurred and expensed by IPC in the three months
ended March 31, 2009. These expenses have been eliminated
from the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. In
addition, an adjustment of $76,200 was recorded to cash and to
retained earnings as at March 31, 2009 to reflect the
remaining transaction costs and Max Termination Fee. Based on an
expected investment return of 3.18% per annum, investment
income of $2,290 would have been foregone during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 had these remaining payments of
$288,084 been made. |
-28-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Employees of IPC hold 522,000 options to purchase IPC
Shares. These options would vest upon a change in control, and
would be exercisable. The exercise price range of these options
is from $13 to $49, with a weighted average of $34.40. It is
expected that 4,186 net shares would be issued upon
exercise of these options. |
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Elimination of IPCs Ordinary Shares of $561, Additional
Paid in Capital of $1,091,491, Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss of $876 and Retained Earnings of $758,298. |
|
|
|
(e) |
|
A related party balance of $265 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and $251 for the year ended
December 31, 2008 representing reinsurance ceded to IPC by
Validus was eliminated from gross premiums written and
reinsurance ceded. Corresponding prepaid reinsurance premiums
and unearned premiums of $199 and premiums receivable and
reinsurance balances payable of $160 have been eliminated from
the pro forma balance sheet. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
statements have been prepared using IPCs publicly
available financial statements and disclosures, without the
benefit of inspection of IPCs books and records.
Therefore, the carrying value of assets and liabilities in
IPCs financial statements are considered to be a proxy for
fair value of those assets and liabilities, with the difference
between the net assets and the total purchase price considered
to be negative goodwill. In addition, certain pro forma
adjustments, such as recording fair value of assets and
liabilities and adjustments for consistency of accounting
policy, are not reflected in these unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial statements. In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(FAS 141(R)) This Statement defines a bargain
purchase as a business combination in which the total
acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred
plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it
requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in earnings as a
gain attributable to the acquirer. Negative goodwill of $116,737
has been recorded as a credit to retained earnings as upon
completion of the Acquisition negative goodwill will be treated
as a gain in the consolidated statement of operations. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
On November 15, 2008, IPCs 9,000,000 Series A
Mandatory Convertible preferred shares automatically converted
pursuant to their terms into 9,129,600 common shares. Therefore,
dividends of $14,939 on these preferred shares of IPC have been
eliminated from the unaudited pro forma results of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
(h) |
|
The share prices of both Validus and IPC used in preparing these
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements
are based on the closing share prices on June 5, 2009, and
were $23.96 and $27.93, respectively. As of June 22, 2009,
the share prices were $20.93 and $26.51, respectively. The
effect of using the June 22, 2009 closing share price in
preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial statements would have resulted in an entry to
additional paid in capital of $192,338 reflecting reduced
purchase price and an offsetting entry to retained earnings of
$192,338 reflecting additional negative goodwill. Using
June 22, 2009 share prices would have had no effect on
calculation of book value per share, diluted book value per
share, basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. |
|
|
4.
|
Adjustments
to cash and cash equivalents
|
The Acquisition will result in the payment of cash and cash
equivalents by IPC of $56,200 and by Validus of $231,884.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statements of
operations reflect the impact of these reductions in cash and
cash equivalents. Actual transaction costs may vary from such
estimates which are based on the best information available at
the time the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information was prepared.
-29-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
For purposes of presentation in the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information, the sources and
uses of funds of the Acquisition are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of funds
|
IPC cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
56,200
|
|
Validus cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
231,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
288,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses of funds
|
Cash consideration for IPC shares
|
|
$
|
211,884
|
|
IPC transaction costs
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
Validus transaction costs
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Max Termination Fee
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
288,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-30-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
|
|
5.
|
Gross
Premiums Written
|
IPC did not disclose gross premiums written by class of business
in the IPC
10-Q.
Therefore, a table of gross premiums written by Validus, IPC and
pro forma combined cannot be presented.
The following table sets forth the gross premiums written for
the year ended December 31, 2008 by Validus, IPC and pro
forma combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus Re
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC(a)
|
|
|
Purchase Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Property Cat XOL(b)
|
|
$
|
328,216
|
|
|
$
|
333,749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
661,965
|
|
Property Per Risk XOL
|
|
|
54,056
|
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,722
|
|
Property Proportional(c)
|
|
|
110,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,695
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
117,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,744
|
|
Aerospace
|
|
|
39,323
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
57,297
|
|
Life and A&H
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,318
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
8,218
|
|
Terrorism
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
Workers Comp
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Validus Re Segment
|
|
|
687,771
|
|
|
|
370,858
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
1,058,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Talbot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
152,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,143
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
287,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,694
|
|
Aviation & Other
|
|
|
40,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,028
|
|
Accident & Health
|
|
|
18,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,314
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
42,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,263
|
|
War
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
Contingency
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
Bloodstock
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Talbot Segment
|
|
|
708,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
(21,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,724
|
)
|
Marine
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
Specialty
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intersegment Revenue Eliminated
|
|
|
(34,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for reinstatement premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,765,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For IPC, this includes annual (deposit) and adjustment premiums.
Excludes reinstatement premiums of $32,537 which are not
classified by class of business by IPC. |
|
(b) |
|
For Validus, Cat XOL is comprised of Catastrophe XOL, Aggregate
XOL, RPP, Per Event XOL, Second Event and Third Event covers.
For IPC, this includes Catastrophe XOL and Retrocessional. |
-31-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Proportional is comprised of Quota Share and Surplus Share. |
Selected ratios of Validus, IPC and pro forma combined are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
combined
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense ratios
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
40.9
|
%
|
Policy acquisition costs ratios
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
General and administrative cost ratios
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
83.7
|
%
|
|
|
75.0
|
%
|
|
|
74.2
|
%
|
|
|
71.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Factors affecting the losses and loss expense ratio for the year
ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Validus losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 was 61.5%. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, the frequency and severity of
worldwide losses that materially affected Validus losses
and loss expense ratio increased. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, Validus incurred $260,567 and $22,141 of
loss expense attributable to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, which
represent 20.7 and 1.8 percentage points of the losses and
loss expense ratio, respectively. Other notable loss events
added $45,895 of 2008 loss expense or 3.7 percentage points
of the losses and loss expense ratio bringing the total effect
of aforementioned events on the 2008 losses and loss expense
ratio to 26.2 percentage points. Favorable loss development
on prior years totaled $69,702. Favorable loss reserve
development benefited Validus losses and loss expense
ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 by
5.5 percentage points. |
|
|
|
The data in the following paragraph is taken from
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in the IPC
10-K. Such
disclosure was not made in thousands of
U.S. dollars, and the data has been reproduced here
as it was originally presented. |
|
|
|
IPCs losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 was 40.2%. IPC incurred net
losses and loss adjustment expenses of $155.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. Total net losses for the
year ended December 31, 2008 relating to the current year
were $206.6 million, while reductions to estimates of
ultimate net loss for prior year events were $50.9 million.
During 2008, IPCs incurred losses included:
$23.0 million from the Alon Refinery explosion in Texas, a
storm that affected Queensland, Australia, and Windstorm Emma
that affected parts of Europe, which all occurred in the first
quarter of 2008; $10.5 million from the flooding in Iowa in
June and tornadoes that affected the mid-west United States in
May 2008; together with $160.0 million from Hurricane Ike
and $7.6 million from Hurricane Gustav, which both occurred
in September 2008. The impact on IPCs 2008 losses and loss
expense ratio from these events was 51.9 percentage points.
The losses from these events were partly offset by reductions to
IPCs estimates of ultimate loss for a number of prior year
events, including $11.0 million for Hurricane Katrina,
$18.6 million for the storm and flooding that affected New
South Wales, Australia in 2007 and $22.8 million for the
floods that affected parts of the U.K. in June and July 2007.
The cumulative $52.4 million of favorable loss reserve
development benefited the IPCs losses and loss expense
ratio for the year ended December 31, 2008 by
13.5 percentage points. |
|
(b) |
|
Factors affecting the losses and loss expense ratio for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Validus losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, was 41.4%. During the
three months ended March 31, |
-32-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
2009, Validus incurred $6,889 and $6,625 of loss expense
attributable to Windstorm Klaus and Australian wildfires,
respectively, which represent 2.2 and 2.1 percentage points
of the losses and loss expense ratio, respectively. Favorable
loss development on prior years totaled $8,079. Favorable loss
reserve development benefited Validus losses and loss
expense ratio for the months ended March 31, 2009 by
2.5 percentage points. |
|
|
|
The data in the following paragraph is taken from
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in the IPC
10-Q. Such
disclosure was not made in thousands of
U.S. dollars, and the data has been reproduced here
as it was originally presented. |
|
|
|
IPCs losses and loss expense ratio, which is defined as
losses and loss expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, was 39.6%. In the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, IPC incurred net losses and
loss adjustment expenses of $39.1 million, compared to
$5.3 million in the first quarter of 2008. Net losses
incurred in the first quarter of 2009 included
$15.0 million from Winter Storm Klaus that affected
southern France and $13.3 million from the bushfires in
south eastern Australia, as well as net adverse development to
their estimates of ultimate losses for several prior year
events. The impact on IPCs losses and loss expense ratio
from these events was 28.7 percentage points. |
|
|
7.
|
Earnings
per Common Share
|
(a) Pro forma earnings per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31,
2009 have been calculated based on the estimated weighted
average number of common shares outstanding on a pro forma
basis, as described in 7(b) below. The historical weighted
average number of common shares outstanding of Validus was
74,677,903 and 75,819,413 basic and diluted, respectively, for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and 75,744,577 and
79,102,643 basic and diluted, respectively, for the three months
ended March 31, 2009.
(b) The pro forma weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2008 and three
months ended March 31, 2009, after giving effect to the
exchange of shares as if the Exchange Offer had been issued and
outstanding for the whole year, is 137,536,627 and 139,295,193,
basic and diluted, and 138,602,185 and 142,577,306, basic and
diluted, respectively.
(c) In the basic earnings per share calculation, dividends
and distributions declared on warrants are deducted from net
income. In calculating diluted earnings per share, we consider
the application of the treasury stock method and the two-class
method and which ever is more dilutive is included into the
calculation of diluted earnings per share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
94,907
|
|
|
$
|
114,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
75,744,577
|
|
|
|
138,602,185
|
|
Share Equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
2,307,094
|
|
|
|
2,307,094
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
|
|
683,468
|
|
|
|
1,300,523
|
|
Options
|
|
|
367,504
|
|
|
|
367,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
79,102,643
|
|
|
|
142,577,306
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-33-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
46,164
|
|
|
$
|
125,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
137,536,627
|
|
Share equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
|
|
1,004,809
|
|
|
|
1,621,865
|
|
Options
|
|
|
136,701
|
|
|
|
136,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
139,295,193
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus calculates diluted book value per share using the
as-if-converted method, where all proceeds received
upon exercise of warrants and stock options would be retained by
Validus and the resulting common shares from exercise remain
outstanding. In its public records, IPC calculates diluted book
value per share using the treasury stock method,
where proceeds received upon exercise of warrants and stock
options would be used by IPC to repurchase shares from the
market, with the net common shares from exercise remaining
outstanding. Accordingly, for the purposes of the Pro Forma
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto,
IPCs diluted book value per share has been recalculated
based on the as-if-converted method to be consistent
with Validus calculation.
The following table sets forth the computation of book value and
diluted book value per share adjusted for the Acquisition as of
March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Book value per common share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,584,376
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
75,828,922
|
|
|
|
138,686,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
26.68
|
|
|
$
|
25.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per common share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,584,376
|
|
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding warrants
|
|
$
|
152,316
|
|
|
$
|
152,316
|
|
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding stock options
|
|
$
|
50,969
|
|
|
$
|
68,709
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,226,271
|
|
|
$
|
3,805,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
75,828,922
|
|
|
|
138,686,530
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
8,680,149
|
|
|
|
8,680,149
|
|
Options
|
|
|
2,795,868
|
|
|
|
3,368,802
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
3,012,854
|
|
|
|
3,629,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,317,793
|
|
|
|
154,365,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per common share
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-34-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
The following table sets forth the computation of debt to total
capitalization and debt (excluding debentures payable) to total
capitalization at March 31, 2009, adjusted for the
Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
304,300
|
|
|
$
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,022,986
|
|
|
$
|
3,584,376
|
|
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
2,327,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,888,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capitalization
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Debt (excluding debentures payable) to total capitalization
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
-35-
COMPARATIVE
PER-SHARE DATA
The IPC historical per share data is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above. The pro forma
combined data is taken from the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information above.
The historical earnings per share, dividends, and book value of
Validus and IPC shown in the table below are derived from their
respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited pro forma
comparative basic and diluted earnings per share data give
effect to the Acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting as if the Acquisition had been completed on
January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma book value and
diluted book value per share information was computed as if the
Acquisition had been completed on December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009.
The historical earnings per share, dividends, and book value of
Validus and IPC shown in the table below are derived from their
respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited pro forma
comparative basic and diluted earnings per share data give
effect to the Acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting as if the Acquisition had been completed on
January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma book value and
diluted book value per share information was computed as if the
Acquisition had been completed on December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009. You should read this information in
conjunction with the historical financial information of Validus
and of IPC included or incorporated elsewhere in this proxy
statement, including Validus and IPCs financial
statements and related notes. The unaudited pro forma data is
not necessarily indicative of actual results had the Acquisition
occurred during the periods indicated. The unaudited pro forma
data is not necessarily indicative of future operations of
Validus.
This pro forma information is subject to risks and
uncertainties, including those discussed in Risk Factors
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data at or for the
|
|
|
year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
Historical
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Equivalent Per
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
combined
|
|
IPC Share(1)
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Book value per common
share
|
|
$
|
25.64
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
25.19
|
|
|
$
|
32.05
|
(2)
|
Diluted book value per common share
|
|
$
|
23.78
|
|
|
$
|
32.85
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
24.06
|
|
|
$
|
30.78
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data at or for the
|
|
|
three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
Historical
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Equivalent Per
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
combined
|
|
IPC Share(1)
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Book value per common share
(at period end)
|
|
$
|
26.68
|
|
|
$
|
33.06
|
|
|
$
|
25.85
|
|
|
$
|
32.79
|
(2)
|
Diluted book value per common share
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
32.75
|
|
|
$
|
24.65
|
|
|
$
|
31.44
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equivalent per share amounts are calculated by multiplying
Validus pro forma per share amounts by the Acquisition exchange
ratio of 1.1234. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of calculating equivalent per IPC share values for
book value per common share and diluted book value per common
share, the $3.75 per common share cash consideration is added to
the equivalent per share amounts. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
IPC reported diluted book value per common share as $33.07 in
the
IPC 10-K
and amended it to $32.85 in an amendment to the
IPC/Max S-4
filed with the SEC on April 13, 2009. |
-36-
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Validus and IPCs Shares are quoted on the NYSE and
NASDAQ, respectively, under the ticker symbol VR and
IPCR, respectively. The following table sets forth
the high and low closing prices per share of Validus Shares and
IPC Shares for the periods indicated (commencing, in the case of
Validus, from Validus initial public offering on
July 25, 2007) as reported on the consolidated tape of
the NYSE or NASDAQ Global Select Market, as applicable, as well
as cash dividends per common share, as reported in the Validus
10-K and
IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively, with
respect to the years 2007 and 2008, and thereafter as reported
in publicly available sources. The IPC dividend information was
taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.30
|
|
|
$
|
21.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
30.25
|
|
|
$
|
20.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Second Quarter (through June 22, 2009)
|
|
$
|
24.55
|
|
|
$
|
20.93
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
28.14
|
|
|
$
|
24.55
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.22
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
28.25
|
|
|
$
|
24.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.72
|
|
|
$
|
20.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
30.38
|
|
|
$
|
26.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.70
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
26.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.16
|
|
|
$
|
14.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
29.90
|
|
|
$
|
19.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
31.53
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
32.53
|
|
|
$
|
28.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.28
|
|
|
$
|
21.11
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
33.01
|
|
|
$
|
24.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.59
|
|
|
$
|
24.73
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
30.13
|
|
|
$
|
26.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
The following table sets out the trading information for Validus
Shares and IPC Shares on March 30, 2009, the last full
trading day before Validus public announcement of delivery
of the Initial Validus Offer to the board of directors of IPC,
and June 22, 2009, the last practicable trading day prior
to the filing of this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
|
Validus Common
|
|
|
IPC Common
|
|
|
Per-Share
|
|
|
|
Share Close
|
|
|
Share Close
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
March 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
24.91
|
|
|
$
|
25.41
|
|
|
$
|
31.73
|
|
June 22, 2009
|
|
$
|
20.93
|
|
|
$
|
26.51
|
|
|
$
|
27.26
|
|
Equivalent per-share amounts are calculated by multiplying
Validus per-share amounts by the Acquisition exchange ratio of
1.1234 and adding $3.75 in cash per IPC Share.
The value of the Scheme of Arrangement will change as the
market prices of Validus Shares and IPC Shares fluctuate prior
to the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement, and may
therefore be different from the prices set forth above at the
effective time and at the time you receive the Validus
Transaction Consideration. See Risk Factors above. IPC
shareholders are encouraged to obtain current market quotations
for Validus Shares and IPC Shares prior to making any decision
with respect to the Scheme of Arrangement.
Please also see The Acquisition Delisting of IPC
Shares for a discussion of the possibility that IPC Shares
will cease to be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and
on the Bermuda Stock Exchange.
As of April 30, 2009, directors and executive officers of
Validus (exclusive of those shareholders who Validus deems to be
qualified sponsors (as defined in this proxy
statement)) held and were entitled to vote approximately 1.76%
of the outstanding Validus Shares. As of March 26, 2009,
directors and executive officers of IPC held and were entitled
to vote approximately 1.4% of the outstanding IPC Shares.
-38-
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This proxy statement may include forward-looking statements,
both with respect to us and our industry, that reflect our
current views with respect to future events and financial
performance. Statements that include the words
expect, intend, plan,
believe, project,
anticipate, will, may and
similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature
identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties,
many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there are or
will be important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in such statements and,
therefore, you should not place undue reliance on any such
statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not
limited to, the following: 1) uncertainty as to whether
Validus will be able to enter into and to consummate the
proposed acquisition on the terms set forth in the Validus
amalgamation offer; 2) uncertainty as to the actual premium
that will be realized by IPC shareholders in connection with the
proposed acquisition; 3) uncertainty as to the long-term
value of Validus Shares; 4) unpredictability and severity
of catastrophic events; 5) rating agency actions;
6) adequacy of Validus or IPCs risk management
and loss limitation methods; 7) cyclicality of demand and
pricing in the insurance and reinsurance markets;
8) Validus limited operating history;
9) Validus ability to implement its business strategy
during soft as well as hard markets;
10) adequacy of Validus or IPCs loss reserves;
11) continued availability of capital and financing;
12) retention of key personnel; 13) competition;
14) potential loss of business from one or more major
insurance or reinsurance brokers; 15) Validus or
IPCs ability to implement, successfully and on a timely
basis, complex infrastructure, distribution capabilities,
systems, procedures and internal controls, and to develop
accurate actuarial data to support the business and regulatory
and reporting requirements; 16) general economic and market
conditions (including inflation, volatility in the credit and
capital markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates); 17) the integration of Talbot or other businesses
we may acquire or new business ventures we may start;
18) the effect on Validus or IPCs investment
portfolios of changing financial market conditions including
inflation, interest rates, liquidity and other factors;
19) acts of terrorism or outbreak of war;
20) availability of reinsurance and retrocessional
coverage; 21) failure to realize the anticipated benefits
of the proposed acquisition, including as a result of failure or
delay in integrating the businesses of Validus and IPC; and
22) the outcome of litigation arising from Validus
offer for IPC, as well as managements response to any of
the aforementioned factors.
The foregoing review of important factors should not be
construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with
the other cautionary statements that are included herein and
elsewhere, including the Risk Factors included in our most
recent reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and the risk factors included in IPCs most recent reports
on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and other documents of Validus and IPC on file with the SEC. Any
forward-looking statements made in this proxy statement are
qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no
assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by
Validus will be realized or, even if substantially realized,
that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on,
us or our business or operations. Except as required by law, we
undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
-39-
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement (including the matters
addressed under Forward-Looking Statements above), you
should carefully consider the following risk factors before
deciding whether to vote to approve the Scheme of Arrangement.
In addition to the risk factors set forth below, you should read
and consider other risk factors specific to each of the Validus
and IPC businesses that will also affect Validus after the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, described in
Part I, Item 1A of each companys annual report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the other
documents that have been filed with the SEC and all of which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. If any of
the risks described below or in the reports incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement actually occurs, the
respective businesses, financial results, financial conditions,
operating results or share prices of Validus or IPC could be
materially adversely affected.
Risks
Related to the Scheme of Arrangement
The
value of the Validus Shares that the IPC shareholders receive in
the Scheme of Arrangement will vary as a result of the fixed
exchange ratio and possible fluctuations in the price of Validus
Shares.
At the effective time, each IPC Share immediately prior to the
effective time (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC
or their respective subsidiaries) will be exchanged for the
Validus Transaction Consideration and cash in lieu of fractional
shares. Because the exchange ratio is fixed at 1.1234 of a
Validus Share for each IPC Share, the market value of the
Validus Shares issued in the Scheme of Arrangement will depend
upon the market price of a Validus Share at the effective time.
If the price of Validus Shares declines, IPC shareholders could
receive less value for their shares upon the consummation of the
Scheme of Arrangement than the value calculated pursuant to the
exchange ratio on the date the Scheme of Arrangement is approved
by the IPC shareholders. Share price changes may result from a
variety of factors that are beyond the companies control,
including general market conditions, changes in business
prospects, catastrophic events, both natural and man-made, and
regulatory considerations. In addition, the ongoing business of
Validus may be adversely affected by actions taken by Validus in
connection with the Scheme of Arrangement, including as a result
of (i) the attention of management of Validus having been
diverted to the Scheme of Arrangement instead of being directed
solely to Validus own operations and pursuit of other
opportunities that could have been beneficial to Validus prior
to and after the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement and
(ii) payment by Validus of certain costs relating to the
Acquisition, including certain legal, accounting and financial
and capital market advisory fees.
Because the Scheme of Arrangement will not be completed until
certain conditions have been satisfied or, where relevant,
waived (see The Scheme of Arrangement Conditions
to the Scheme of Arrangement below), a period of time may
pass which may be significant between the filing of this proxy
statement and the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement.
Therefore, at the time when you vote with respect to the
court-ordered IPC meeting, you will not know the exact market
value of the Validus Shares that will be issued if the Scheme of
Arrangement becomes effective. Please see Comparative Market
Price and Dividend Information above for the historical high
and low closing prices per share of Validus Shares and IPC
Shares, as well as cash dividends per share of Validus Shares
and IPC Shares respectively for each quarter of the period 2007
through 2009.
Furthermore, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement,
Validus estimates that it will need to issue approximately
63,474,234 Validus Shares. The increase in the number of Validus
Shares may lead to sales of such shares or the perception that
such sales may occur, either of which may adversely affect the
market for, and the market price of, Validus Shares.
IPC shareholders are urged to obtain market quotations for
Validus Shares and IPC Shares when they consider whether to
tender their IPC Shares pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
The
Scheme of Arrangement is subject to conditions that Validus
cannot control which may result in the Scheme of Arrangement
being terminated.
The Scheme of Arrangement is subject to conditions, including
the approval by our shareholders of the issuance of Validus
Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, the sanctioning of
the Scheme of Arrangement
-40-
by the Supreme Court of Bermuda, no material adverse effect
having occurred with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, IPC
and its subsidiaries continuing to operate in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice and the consent
of the lenders under Validus credit agreements. There are
no assurances that all of such conditions will be satisfied, or
where relevant, waived. In addition, the IPC board of directors
may take actions that will delay, or frustrate, the satisfaction
of one or more conditions. If the conditions are not met, then
Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement. Please see
The Scheme of Arrangement Conditions to the
Scheme of Arrangement on page [ ] for
a complete description of the conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement.
Validus
may waive one or more of the conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement or modify the Scheme of Arrangement
without resoliciting or seeking additional shareholder
approval.
Except for the unwaivable conditions described below in The
Scheme of Arrangement Conditions to the Scheme of
Arrangement, each of the conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement may be waived, in whole or in part by
Validus. Validus may consent on behalf of all persons concerned
to any modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement
or any condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of
Arrangement which the Supreme Court of Bermuda may approve or
impose. The board of directors of Validus will evaluate the
materiality of any such modification, addition or condition to
determine whether resolicitation of proxies is necessary, or if
shareholder approval has been received, whether further
shareholder approval is necessary. In the event that any such
modification, addition or condition is not determined to be
significant enough to require resolicitation or additional
approval of shareholders, the Scheme of Arrangement may be
consummated without seeking further shareholder approval.
The
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement could under certain
circumstances result in the payment of the Max Termination
Fee.
While Validus believes the provision of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement providing for the possible payment of the Max
Termination Fee is invalid and is seeking a ruling of the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to that effect, a court may determine
that IPC is required, or IPC may otherwise be bound, to pay all,
or a portion, of the Max Termination Fee, including in the
circumstance where IPC subsequently agrees to enter into an
agreement with a third party in respect of another business
combination.
The
Scheme of Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation may
fail to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, resulting in your full
recognition of taxable gain or loss in respect of your IPC
Shares.
The Scheme of Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation
are intended to constitute a single integrated transaction that
qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. No legal opinion from
U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service (the IRS) has been requested, or is
expected to be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form
amalgamation. No assurance can be given that the IRS will not
assert, or that a court would not sustain, that the transaction
does not qualify as a reorganization. If the transaction fails
to qualify as a reorganization, you generally would recognize
gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between the sum of
the fair market value of the Validus Shares received in the
Scheme of Arrangement and the cash received and your adjusted
tax basis in IPC Shares surrendered in exchange therefor. For
more information, please see the section of this proxy statement
under the caption Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences. U.S. holders of IPC Shares should
consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences to
them of the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation,
including any U.S. federal, state, local,
non-U.S. or
other tax consequences, and any tax return filing or other
reporting requirements.
Risks
Related to IPCs Businesses
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to
IPCs businesses that will also affect Validus after the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, described in
Part I, Item 1A of the IPC
10-K and
other documents that have been filed by IPC with the SEC and
which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
-41-
Risks
Related to Validus Businesses
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to
Validus businesses that will also affect Validus after the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, described in
Part I, Item 1A of the Validus
10-K and
other documents that have been filed by Validus with the SEC and
which are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Risks
Related to Validus Following the Effectiveness of the Scheme of
Arrangement
Validus
may experience difficulties integrating IPCs businesses,
which could cause Validus to fail to realize the anticipated
benefits of the Scheme of Arrangement.
If the Scheme of Arrangement is consummated, achieving the
anticipated benefits of the Acquisition will depend in part upon
whether the two companies integrate their businesses in an
effective and efficient manner. The companies may not be able to
accomplish this integration process smoothly or successfully.
The integration of certain operations following the Acquisition
will take time and will require the dedication of significant
management resources, which may temporarily distract
managements attention from the routine business of
Validus. Any delay or inability of management to successfully
integrate the operations of the two companies could compromise
Validus potential to achieve the anticipated long-term
strategic benefits of the Acquisition and could have a material
adverse effect on the business, financial condition, operating
results and market value of Validus Shares after the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement.
As of
the date of the filing of this proxy statement, Validus has only
conducted a review of IPCs publicly available information
and a limited review of IPCs non-public information.
Therefore, Validus may be subject to unknown liabilities of IPC
which may have a material adverse effect on Validus
profitability, financial condition and results of
operations
On June 14, 2009, IPC and Validus entered into a mutual
confidentiality agreement. Therefore, prior to that date,
Validus has only conducted a due diligence review of IPCs
publicly available information. Since June 14, 2009 to the
date of filing of this proxy statement, Validus has conducted a
limited review of IPCs non-public information. In light of
the foregoing, Validus may be unaware of circumstances where the
consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement may constitute a
default, or an event that, with or without notice or lapse of
time or both, would constitute a default, or result in the
termination, cancellation, acceleration or other change of any
right or obligation (including, without limitation, any payment
obligation) under agreements of IPC that are not publicly
available. As a result, after the consummation of the Scheme of
Arrangement, Validus may be subject to unknown liabilities of
IPC, which may have a material adverse effect on Validus
profitability, financial condition and results of operations.
The Scheme of Arrangement may also permit a counter-party to an
agreement with IPC to terminate that agreement because
completion of the Scheme of Arrangement would cause a default or
violate an anti-assignment, change of control or similar clause.
If this happens, Validus may have to seek to replace that
agreement with a new agreement. Validus cannot assure you that
it will be able to replace a terminated agreement on comparable
terms or at all. Depending on the importance of a terminated
agreement to IPCs business, failure to replace that
agreement on similar terms or at all may increase the costs to
Validus of operating IPCs business or prevent Validus from
operating part or all of IPCs business.
In respect of all information relating to IPC presented in,
incorporated by reference into or omitted from, this proxy
statement, Validus has relied upon publicly available
information, including information publicly filed by IPC with
the SEC. Although Validus has no knowledge that would indicate
that any statements contained herein regarding IPCs
condition, including its financial or operating condition (based
upon such publicly filed reports and documents) are inaccurate,
incomplete or untrue, Validus was not involved in the
preparation of such information and statements. For example,
Validus has made adjustments and assumptions in preparing the
pro forma financial information presented in this proxy
statement that have necessarily involved Validus estimates
with respect to IPCs financial information. Any financial,
operating or other information regarding IPC that may be
detrimental to
-42-
Validus following the effectiveness of the Scheme of
Arrangement that has not been publicly disclosed by IPC or
otherwise made available to Validus, or errors in Validus
estimates due to the lack of access to IPC, may have a material
adverse effect on Validus financial condition or the
benefits Validus expects to achieve through the consummation of
the Scheme of Arrangement.
The
Scheme of Arrangement may result in ratings downgrades of one or
more of Validus insurance or reinsurance subsidiaries
(including the newly acquired IPC insurance and reinsurance
operating companies) which may adversely affect Validus
business, financial condition and operating results, as well as
the market price of Validus Shares.
Ratings with respect to claims paying ability and financial
strength are important factors in maintaining customer
confidence in Validus and its ability to market insurance and
reinsurance products and compete with other insurance and
reinsurance companies. Rating organizations regularly analyze
the financial performance and condition of insurers and
reinsurers and will likely reevaluate the ratings of Validus and
its reinsurance subsidiaries following the effectiveness of the
Scheme of Arrangement. While each of Standard &
Poors and A.M. Best have not taken any action with
respect to Validus ratings following the announcement of
the Initial Validus Offer or the Validus Amalgamation Offer,
Moodys has changed the outlook to negative with respect to
the A3 insurance financial strength rating of Validus
reinsurance subsidiary, Validus Reinsurance, Ltd., and the Baa2
long-term issuer rating of Validus. Additionally, although
A.M. Best has assigned the reinsurance subsidiaries of IPC
(including IPCRe Limited and IPCRe Europe Limited) the financial
strength rating of A (Excellent) and issuer credit
ratings of a and IPC the issuer credit rating of
bbb, A.M. Best has also indicated that each of
these IPC ratings is under review with negative implications in
connection with the Proposed Max Amalgamation. A.M. Best
and the other ratings agencies would most likely provide similar
scrutiny and analysis of the Scheme of Arrangement. Following
the consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement, any ratings
downgrades, or the potential for ratings downgrades, of Validus
or its subsidiaries (including the newly acquired IPC operating
companies) could adversely affect Validus ability to
market and distribute products and services and successfully
compete in the marketplace, which could have a material adverse
effect on its business, financial condition and operating
results, as well as the market price for Validus Shares.
The
occurrence of severe catastrophic events after consummation of
the Scheme of Arrangement could cause Validus net income
to be more volatile than if the consummation of the Scheme of
Arrangement did not take place.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus gross
premiums written (excluding reinstatement premiums) on property
catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total
gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31,
2008, 93% of IPCs gross premiums written covered property
catastrophe reinsurance risks. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, after giving effect to the Scheme of
Arrangement as if it had been consummated on December 31,
2008, gross premiums written on property catastrophe business
would have been $661.9 million or 37.5% of total gross
premiums of Validus on a pro forma basis. Because Validus after
the Scheme of Arrangement will, among other things, have larger
aggregate exposures to natural and man-made disasters than it
does today, Validus aggregate loss experience could have a
significant influence on Validus net income. See
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial
Information.
-43-
THE
ACQUISITION
General
Description
In order to consummate the Acquisition, Validus is
simultaneously pursuing the following alternative transaction
structures:
(1) the Validus Amalgamation Offer;
(2) the Exchange Offer; and
(3) the Scheme of Arrangement to which this proxy statement
relates.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to
acquire all of the IPC Shares on the same economic terms.
Ultimately, only one of these transaction structures can be
pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek to acquire all
IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines is most
effective and efficient to consummate the Acquisition.
In order to consummate the Acquisition without the cooperation
of the current IPC board of directors, Validus is pursuing a
three-part plan.
First, Validus solicited proxies from IPC shareholders to vote
against the Proposed Max Amalgamation, which was voted down by
IPC shareholders on June 12, 2009. Maxs board of
directors subsequently terminated the Max Amalgamation
Agreement. Accordingly, IPCs board of directors is now
free to enter into an amalgamation agreement with Validus. While
Validus continues to seek a consensual amalgamation with IPC, it
is continuing to pursue alternatives to complete the Acquisition.
Second, Validus has commenced the Exchange Offer. The Exchange
Offer is subject to the terms and conditions described in the
prospectus/offer to exchange included in the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed by Validus with the SEC. Under Bermuda law, if Validus
acquires at least 90% of the IPC Shares which it is seeking to
acquire in the Exchange Offer, Validus will have the right to
acquire the remaining IPC Shares on the same terms in a
second-step acquisition. The Chairman of IPCs board of
directors sent a letter to Validus which stated that the IPC
bye-laws would prevent Validus from becoming the legal owner of
10% or more of the IPC Shares. Validus believes, based upon the
advice of Bermuda and UK counsel, that the IPC bye-laws will not
operate to prevent Validus from accepting IPC Shares for
exchange in the Exchange Offer and acquiring beneficial
ownership of any such IPC Shares. IPC has stated in a letter to
its shareholders that IPC believes that Validus faces
substantial legal uncertainties if it attempts to squeeze out
IPCs remaining shareholders on such basis. Validus will
take such actions as are necessary, including by seeking a
judgment of a Bermuda court, to enforce its rights under
Section 102
and/or
Section 103 of the Companies Act to the extent that any
person (including IPC, IPCs board of directors or any IPC
shareholder) seeks to restrict the operation thereof. However,
resolution of any such actions or proceedings is not a condition
to the Exchange Offer and there can be no certainty as to the
outcome of any such actions or proceedings.
The expiration time of the Exchange Offer is June 26, 2009,
unless extended. As a result, if the conditions of the Exchange
Offer are satisfied or waived at the expiration time of the
Exchange Offer, Validus would be able to acquire all of the IPC
Shares that are validly tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
Third, Validus is pursuing the Scheme of Arrangement. In order
to implement the Scheme of Arrangement, IPC shareholders must
approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, IPC must separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement,
the IPC shareholders must approve the Validus Proposals and the
Scheme of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda. For a description of the Validus Proposals, see
Proposals to be Submitted to IPC Shareholder Vote at the IPC
Special General Meeting; Voting Requirements and
Recommendation in Validus proxy statement for the IPC
special general meeting. If the IPC shareholders approve the
Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the
separate approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be
provided by either (i) the IPC board of directors
voluntarily complying with the will of the IPC shareholders as
expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the
shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at the IPC special
general meeting. On June 16, 2009, Validus filed with the
SEC a definitive proxy statement which is being used to solicit
written requisitions from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC
board of directors to call the IPC special general meeting.
Following IPC shareholder approval at both the court-ordered IPC
-44-
meeting and the IPC special general meeting, the satisfaction
or, where relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement, and the granting of
a court order from the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the
Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the court order sanctioning the
Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the Bermuda Registrar
of Companies, at which time the Scheme of Arrangement will be
effective. In a decision rendered on May 29, 2009, the Supreme
Court of Bermuda dismissed Validus application to convene
a meeting of IPC shareholders to consider the Scheme of
Arrangement but determined that it has jurisdiction to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement without approval of the IPC board of
directors. However, the Court determined not to exercise its
discretion to order the court-ordered IPC meeting in advance of
the vote on the Proposed Max Amalgamation at the IPC annual
general meeting and evidence of IPC shareholder support for the
Scheme of Arrangement and there can be no assurance that the
Court will on a subsequent application by Validus exercise its
discretion to convene such a meeting.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to
acquire all of the IPC Shares on the same economic terms.
Ultimately, only one of these transactions can be pursued to
completion. Validus will determine which method is most
effective and efficient to consummate the Acquisition. However,
if the IPC board of directors cooperates with Validus and
executes an amalgamation agreement with Validus, the
court-ordered IPC meeting may be unnecessary and may not be
held. While Validus continues to seek a consensual amalgamation
transaction with IPC, we will continue to pursue the Scheme of
Arrangement and Exchange Offer in order to complete the
Acquisition and will seek to replace the IPC board of directors
if an agreement with the IPC board of directors is not reached
in a timely fashion.
Based on Validus and IPCs respective capitalizations
as of March 31, 2009 and the exchange ratio of 1.1234,
Validus estimates that former IPC shareholders would own, in the
aggregate, approximately 41.3% of the Validus Shares on a
fully-diluted basis following closing of the Acquisition.
Further details relating to the structure of the Scheme of
Arrangement are described in The Scheme of Arrangement
below.
-45-
Background
of the Acquisition
On March 2, 2009, IPC and Max announced that they had
entered into the Max Amalgamation Agreement. The IPC/Max
S-4 provides
a summary of the events leading to Max and IPC entering into the
Max Amalgamation Agreement.
In the morning of March 31, 2009, Edward J. Noonan, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors
of Validus, placed a telephone call to James P. Bryce, the Chief
Executive Officer and President of IPC. Mr. Noonan spoke
with Mr. Bryce and explained that Validus intended to make
an offer to exchange each outstanding IPC Share for 1.2037
Validus Shares, subject to the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement.
Following this telephone call, in the morning of March 31,
2009, Validus delivered a proposal letter containing the Initial
Validus Offer to IPCs board of directors in care of
Mr. Bryce and issued a press release announcing the Initial
Validus Offer. The letter reads as follows:
March 31,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
|
|
|
|
Re:
|
Superior Amalgamation Proposal by Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) to
IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC)
|
Dear Sirs:
On behalf of Validus, I am writing to submit a binding
offer1
pursuant to which Validus and IPC would amalgamate in a
share-for-share exchange valuing IPC shares at an 18.0% premium
to yesterdays closing market price. We believe that an
amalgamation of Validus and IPC would represent a compelling
combination and excellent strategic fit and create superior
value for our respective shareholders.
We unquestionably would have preferred to work cooperatively
with you to complete a negotiated transaction. However, it was
necessary to communicate our binding offer to you by letter
because of the provisions of the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation between IPC and Max Capital Group Ltd.
(Max), dated as of March 1, 2009, as amended on
March 5, 2009 (the Max Plan of Amalgamation).
We have reviewed the Max Plan of Amalgamation and see that it
contemplates your receipt of acquisition proposals. Given the
importance of our binding offer to our respective shareholders,
we have decided to make this letter public.
Our binding offer involves a share-for-share exchange valuing
IPC shares at an 18.0% premium to yesterdays closing
market price. Consistent with that, we are prepared to
amalgamate with IPC at a fixed exchange ratio of 1.2037 Validus
shares per IPC share.
Our board of directors has unanimously approved the submission
of our binding offer and delivery of the enclosed signed
amalgamation agreement, so that, upon termination of the Max
Plan of Amalgamation, you will be able to sign the enclosed
agreement with the certainty of an agreed transaction. Our offer
is structured as a tax-free share-for-share transaction and does
not require any external financing. It is not conditioned on due
diligence. The only conditions to our offer are those contained
in the enclosed executed amalgamation agreement.
1 Throughout
this letter we refer to our binding offer because,
as of the date of this letter, we had indicated to IPC that our
offer could not be withdrawn prior to April 15, 2009. As of
the date of this proxy statement, we have revised our offer. The
terms of our offer do not prevent us from withdrawing it.
-46-
Our binding offer is clearly superior to the Max transaction for
your shareholders and is a Superior Proposal as defined in
section 5.5(f) of the Max Plan of Amalgamation for the
reasons set forth below.
Superior Current Value. Our proposed
transaction will provide superior current value for your
shareholders. Our fixed exchange ratio of 1.2037 represents a
value of $29.98 per IPC share, which is a premium of 18.0% to
the closing price of IPCs common shares on March 30,
2009.2
Superior Trading
Characteristics. Validus common shares
have superior trading characteristics to those of Max as noted
in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
Max
|
|
Share Price Change Since Validus IPO(1)
|
|
+13.2%
|
|
−36.5%
|
Mkt. Cap as of 3/30/09
|
|
$2.0 billion
|
|
$0.9 billion
|
Average Daily Trading Volume(2)
|
|
$11.3 million
|
|
$6.7 million
|
Price / Book(3)
|
|
1.05x
|
|
0.76x
|
Price / Tangible Book(3)
|
|
1.13x
|
|
0.77x
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the closing prices on March 30, 2009 and
July 24, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Three months prior to March 2, 2009, date of announcement
of Max and IPC amalgamation. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on December 31, 2008 GAAP book value per diluted
share and diluted tangible GAAP book value per share using
closing prices on March 30, 2009. |
Less Balance Sheet
Risk.3 The
combined investment portfolio of IPC/Validus is more stable than
that of
IPC/Max4.
Pro forma for the proposed IPC/Max combination,
alternative investments represent 12% of investments
and 29% of shareholders equity. In contrast, Validus does
not invest in alternatives and pro forma for a
Validus/IPC combination, alternative investments
represent 3% of investments and 4% of shareholders equity,
providing greater safety for shareholders and clients.
Superior Long-term Prospects. A combined Validus and IPC
would be a superior company to IPC/Max with greater growth
prospects and synergies with:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Superior size and scale, with pro forma December 31,
2008 shareholders equity of $3.7 billion and
total GAAP capitalization of $4.1 billion;
|
2 The
Validus Amalgamation Offer, as increased on June 8, 2009,
provides IPC shareholders with total consideration of $30.67 per
IPC Share based on the closing price of Validus Shares on
June 5, 2009, a 9.8% premium to the closing price of IPC
Shares that day and a 24.9% premium based on the closing prices
of IPC Shares and Validus Shares on March 30, 2009, the
last trading day before the announcement of the Initial Validus
Offer.
3 The
occurrence of severe catastrophic events after an amalgamation
with IPC could cause Validus net income to be more
volatile than if the amalgamation did not take place. For the
year ended December 31, 2008, Validus gross premiums
written (excluding reinstatement premiums) on property
catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total
gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31,
2008, 93% of IPCs gross premiums written (excluding
reinstatement premiums) covered property catastrophe reinsurance
risks. For the year ended December 31, 2008, after giving
effect to the amalgamation of Validus and IPC as if it had been
consummated on December 31, 2008, gross premiums written on
property catastrophe business would have been
$661.9 million or 37.5% of total gross premiums of Validus
on a pro forma basis. Because Validus after the amalgamation
will, among other things, have larger aggregate exposures to
natural and man-made disasters than it does today, Validus
aggregate loss experience could have a significant influence on
Validus net income. IPC did not disclose gross premiums
written by class of business in the IPC
10-Q.
Therefore, comparable disclosure of property catastrophe
premiums cannot be presented.
4 Despite
Maxs announced plan to reduce its exposure to alternative
investments to 10-12% of its portfolio, according to recent Max
disclosures, as a result of the Proposed Max Amalgamation,
IPCs investment in alternative investments would increase
from 7% of its total portfolio at December 31, 2008 to 12%
of its total portfolio on a pro forma basis after giving effect
to the Proposed Max Amalgamation, an increase of 5%.
-47-
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Superior financial flexibility, with debt/total capitalization
of only 1.8% and total leverage including hybrid securities of
only 9.1%;
|
|
|
3.
|
A global platform, with offices and underwriting facilities in
Bermuda, at Lloyds in London, Dublin, Singapore, New York
and Miami;
|
|
|
4.
|
Superior diversified business mix, with lines of business
concentrated in short-tail lines where pricing momentum is
strongest; and
|
|
|
5.
|
An experienced, proven and stable management team with
substantial expertise operating in IPCs core lines of
business.
|
Our superior growth prospects are evidenced by our historical
track record. Between December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2008, Validus grew its book value per share
(including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% compound annual
rate vs. Maxs 8.8% growth over the same period. In 2008,
we grew our book value per share (including accumulated
dividends) by 2.4% vs. Maxs 10.8% decline over the same
period.
Expedited Closing Process. We will be
able to close an amalgamation with IPC more quickly than Max
because we will not require the approval of U.S. insurance
regulators.5
Substantially the Same Contractual Terms and
Conditions. Our proposed amalgamation
agreement contains substantially the same terms and conditions
as those in the Max Plan of Amalgamation, and for your
convenience we have included a markup of our amalgamation
agreement against the Max Plan of Amalgamation.
Superior Outcome for Bermuda
Community. The combination of Validus and IPC
creates a larger, stronger entity than a combination of Max and
IPC which will benefit the Bermuda
community.6
Superior Outcome for IPC
Clients. Validus has a greater commitment to
the lines of business underwritten by IPC and has superior
technical expertise and capacity to provide IPC customers with
continuing reinsurance coverage. Max has consistently stated its
intention to reduce its commitment to IPCs business.
Therefore, a combination with Validus will be less disruptive to
IPCs client base.
Our binding offer is clearly a Superior Proposal, within the
meaning of the Max Plan of Amalgamation. We and our financial
advisors, Greenhill & Co., LLC, and our legal
advisors, Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp, are prepared
to move forward immediately. We believe that our offer presents
a compelling opportunity for both our companies and our
respective shareholders, and look forward to your prompt
response. We respectfully request that the Board of IPC reach a
determination by 5:00 p.m., Bermuda time, on Wednesday,
April 15, 2009, that (i) our binding offer constitutes
a Superior Proposal, (ii) it is withdrawing its
recommendation for the transaction contemplated by the Max Plan
of Amalgamation and (iii) it is making a recommendation for
the transaction contemplated by this binding offer.
We reserve the right to withdraw this offer if the Board of IPC
has not reached a determination (i) that our binding offer
constitutes a Superior Proposal, (ii) to withdraw its
recommendation for the transaction contemplated by the Max Plan
of Amalgamation and (iii) to make a recommendation for the
transaction contemplated by this binding offer by
5:00 p.m., Bermuda time, on Wednesday, April 15, 2009.
We further reserve the right to withdraw this binding offer if
you subsequently withdraw your recommendation in favor of our
offer or if you do not sign the enclosed amalgamation agreement
within two business days after the termination of the Max Plan
of Amalgamation.
5 As
of the date of this letter, our belief that we could close an
amalgamation with IPC more quickly than Max was based on the
observation that the Validus amalgamation with IPC would not
require the approval of U.S. insurance regulators because
neither IPC nor Validus operates a
U.S.-regulated
insurance business that would require any such approval while
the Proposed Max Amalgamation would have required such approvals.
6 We
believe that a larger, stronger entity will benefit the Bermuda
community because it offers greater stability.
-48-
We look forward to your prompt response.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
cc: |
Robert F. Greenhill
Greenhill & Co., LLC
|
John J. Schuster
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
In the afternoon on March 31, 2009, IPC issued a press
release acknowledging receipt of the letter from Validus
outlining the Initial Validus Offer. The text of the press
release reads as follows:
IPC Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: IPCR) (IPC) acknowledges
receipt of an unsolicited letter dated today, March 31,
2009, from Validus Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: VR)
(Validus) outlining a proposed transaction.
On March 2, 2009, IPC entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation (the Amalgamation Agreement) with its
wholly-owned subsidiary IPC Limited and Max Capital Group Ltd.
(Max) which provides that Max will amalgamate with
IPC Limited. IPC continues to be bound by the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement and the parties have recently filed a
joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities &
Exchange Commission.
IPCs Board of Directors will review the terms of the
proposal submitted by Validus in a manner consistent with its
obligations under the Amalgamation Agreement and applicable
Bermuda law.
IPC will have no further comment on this matter until IPCs
Board of Directors makes a determination regarding Validus
offer.
Also in the afternoon on March 31, 2009, Max issued a press
release announcing that it had received from IPC a copy of the
letter from Validus outlining the Initial Validus Offer. The
text of the press release reads as follows:
Max Capital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: MXGL; BSX: MXGL BH) today
announced that it has received a copy of Validus Holdings,
Ltd.s unsolicited, stock-for-stock, proposal for IPC
Holdings, Ltd.
As previously announced on March 2, 2009, Max and IPC
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation pursuant to
which Max will amalgamate with IPC Limited. The Boards of both
companies have previously stated that the combination of Max
with IPC would create a strong company with a balanced,
diversified portfolio of risk across a mix of geographies and
business lines with the opportunity to generate more stable and
attractive returns on capital. Maxs pending merger with
IPC is expected to be completed late in the second quarter or
early in the third quarter of this year.
W. Marston (Marty) Becker, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Max Capital, said: In todays
unprecedented business environment and cycle, we believe that
diversification, in terms of global presence and both short and
long-tail exposures, significantly reduces risk and provides a
more solid platform for building sustained long-term value. The
merger of IPC and Max was founded on a shared vision of allowing
the combined group of shareholders to enjoy the benefits of a
strong, diversified operating platform with a proven track
record. While we have not yet had the opportunity to review
Validus proposal carefully, we believe that combining two
short-tailed property catastrophe oriented companies would
appear to do little for true shareholder diversification. By
contrast, Maxs track record of building a diversified
platform without diluting shareholder value should lead to
better long-term growth prospects and value creation following
completion of the pending IPC-Max merger.
-49-
In the morning on April 2, 2009, Max sent a letter to
IPCs board of directors purporting to outline the relative
advantages of the pending Proposed Max Amalgamation as well as
the business and financial issues raised by the Initial Validus
Offer and issued a press release announcing the letter. The text
of the letter reads as follows:
Dear Members of the Board:
We are writing regarding the many business and financial issues
raised by the public proposal by Validus Holdings Ltd.
(Validus) to acquire IPC Holdings, Ltd.
(IPC) in lieu of the pending IPC amalgamation with
Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max). The IPC/Max
amalgamation was founded on a shared vision of allowing our
combined group of shareholders to enjoy the benefits of a
strong, diversified operating platform with a proven track
record. The Validus proposal does not offer that.
Rather, in light of the Validus proposal, the IPC Board faces
two starkly contrasting choices:
A. You can agree to be taken over by Validus at a price
that is below IPCs book value. The result of this takeover
for your shareholders would be a minority equity stake in an
entity that offers substantially similar product lines to those
offered by IPC today, with little risk diversification, and
apparently no ability by the IPC Board to steward the longer
term prospects of the company.
OR
B. You can complete the planned merger of equals with Max
at a price that is below Maxs book value. We believe that
this transaction will create a more stable entity that will
provide significant product, geographic and risk diversification
and over which IPCs Board will continue to have
significant influence, which in turn will provide superior
shareholder value.
For the reasons set forth below, and in the accompanying
exhibits, we do not agree with Validus that its proposal
represents a Superior Proposal or is a proposal that
can reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal
pursuant to the IPC/Max Plan of Amalgamation dated March 1,
2009 (the IPC/Max Plan).
1. A combination with Max delivers 29% more tangible
book value per share to IPC. As we operate in an
industry where the primary valuation driver is a multiple of
book value (and tangible book value), we believe that a
transaction that maximizes the book value to shareholders
provides the best opportunity to generate shareholder value. The
IPC combination with Max is a truly superior proposal versus the
takeover proposal by Validus. The takeover proposal by Validus
would result in IPC receiving only $28.35 in diluted book value
per IPC share and $26.19 of diluted tangible book value per IPC
share from Validus. In contrast, our combination delivers $34.93
of diluted book value per IPC share (a 23.2% premium to Validus)
and $33.83 of diluted tangible book value per IPC share from Max
(a 29.2% premium to Validus). A combination with Max provides
greater underlying value to IPCs shareholders, which we
believe will result in greater upside for both IPC and Max
shareholders.
2. The IPC/Max Plan creates significant value for IPC
shareholders. As we indicated during our discussions,
we believe that the IPC/Max Plan provides an attractive
financial outcome for IPC. The IPC/Max Plan is expected to be
accretive to both earnings per share and return on equity. In
addition, as you consider the historical trading multiples of
Max and IPC, there is significant opportunity to create
substantial value for all shareholders of the combined company.
We believe the Validus proposal prioritizes an immediate
premium in the form of stock for IPC shareholders,
while compromising a value creation opportunity for IPC
shareholders. Importantly, the written proposal by Validus does
not contemplate any participation by the IPC board of directors,
whose participation remains an important consideration for Max
in the amalgamation and provides continuity to shareholders and
clients.
3. Max is a truly diversified underwriting
platform. The IPC/Max Plan offers IPCs
shareholders superior current and future value by combining IPC
with a truly diversified underwriting platform, with a strong
and well established track record. Max enjoys a diversified
portfolio of business across many dimensions by
class, geography, customers and distribution. We believe that
Maxs diversified underwriting platform, with its strong
emphasis on profitable longer-tail casualty business, will
generate more stable returns on capital through underwriting
cycles, compared to the volatility embedded in the Validus
short-tail portfolio. Validus, whose 2008 gross premiums
written are 94% concentrated in short- tail lines of business,
claims that its
-50-
portfolio represents diversification. Validus
ability to deliver anything approaching true diversification
seems to be constrained by its limited underwriting platforms in
Bermuda and at Lloyds and lack of underwriting
capabilities in longer-tail casualty classes.
Combining two short-tailed property catastrophe companies as
proposed by Validus does little for shareholder diversification.
Validus stated intention to take advantage of currently
strong rates in the property market is a short-term strategy
that is capital intensive, creates greater volatility for
shareholders, and is one which IPC could have continued on a
stand-alone basis but elected not to do so. By contrast, Max
remains committed to an underwriting strategy that produces
attractive results across market cycles, by continuing to expand
its specialty insurance business in selected underwriting
classes and limiting volatility in its underwriting results.
4. Max has a proven, long-term, operating
history. Maxs underwriting has been tested
through the tragic events of 9/11, the active 2004 hurricane
season and the confluence of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma
in 2005. Validus operating history, by contrast, does not
extend beyond the past three years, during which time the
industry as a whole has experienced both strong property
catastrophe pricing and limited catastrophe activity. The first
test of Validus portfolio of business and risk management
capabilities since its formation three years ago came in 2008
with Hurricanes Ike and Gustav. In our view, the results speak
for themselves: the net loss reported by Validus for these
events represented 12.4% of its June 30,
2008 shareholders equity, the largest percentage loss
of its broad peer group which averaged 7.2% of
shareholders equity. The loss was almost double the net
loss incurred by IPC, which represented just 6.7% of IPCs
June 30, 2008 shareholders equity. The losses
recorded by Validus included a 42% increase in its initial loss
estimate for Hurricane Ike (from $165 million to
$235 million) during the fourth quarter of 2008. By
comparison, Maxs net incurred losses from Hurricanes Ike
and Gustav were limited to 3.4% of June 30,
2008 shareholders equity, the lowest among the
broader peer group, demonstrating the lower embedded volatility
of Maxs underwriting results versus Validus.
5. IPC and Max can complete an amalgamation more
quickly, and with greater certainty.
(a) IPC and Max can close our amalgamation
expeditiously. Max believes that the IPC/Max Plan
can close as soon as June 2009. By contrast, we believe that
Validus would not be in a position to close a transaction with
IPC until September 2009 at the earliest, notwithstanding its
public prediction of a second quarter close. As you are well
aware, the IPC/Max Plan requires that shareholders have the
opportunity to vote on our amalgamation before IPCs Board
can terminate our agreement and thereafter begin discussions
with a bidder such as Validus. We anticipate that we will be
able to hold our respective shareholder meetings in June, and
only after those shareholder votes would Validus be able to
pursue its proposal. Validus inability to close before
September 2009, the middle of hurricane season, adds meaningful
uncertainly to Validus proposal, as IPC shareholders and
the transaction itself would be put at risk by the significant
catastrophe exposures of Validus and Validus ability to
terminate the transaction based upon changes in
shareholders equity. Much has been made by Validus
regarding US regulatory approvals required to complete the
IPC/Max amalgamation. As you know, these approvals are well
underway and we do not foresee such requisite approvals
adversely impacting a possible June closing.
(b) IPC has conducted extensive diligence on
Max. IPC was given complete and open access to
Max to afford you and your outside advisors and consultants with
the ability to conduct extensive due diligence on Max. The
Validus proposal seeks to have IPC enter into a transaction for
which IPC has not conducted due diligence. We also note that
certain of Validus disclosure schedules will not be
provided to IPC until after IPC and Maxs shareholders have
the opportunity to vote upon our amalgamation.
6. Maxs business is complementary to
IPC. Clients seek a diversified program of reinsurers.
As you were able to confirm in your due diligence, Max has very
limited overlap with the customers of IPC and neither party
expects a combination of IPC and Max to lead to any meaningful
disruption of either business. In addition, the continuity of
the underwriters at IPC will maximize the opportunity for IPC to
continue to write this business in the future, assuming market
conditions support it. By contrast, Validus acknowledges that it
writes business with many of the same clients as IPC, which we
would expect to result in a loss of business as clients seek to
diversify their reinsurance placements.
-51-
7. Maxs complementary and diversified platform is
appreciated by our ratings agencies. Max currently has
a financial strength rating of A- by A.M. Best, with its
outlook changed to positive in December 2008. As IPC and Max
have jointly presented to our ratings agencies, IPCs Board
has the comfort of knowing that the ratings agencies view our
combination, and its diversifying impact on IPCs business,
positively. In contrast, we believe that the agencies would not
look as favorably on combining two short-tailed
property-oriented platforms.
8. Max maintains less underwriting volatility through
greater diversification of its portfolio of risks. Max
seeks to limit its exposure to catastrophic events (probable
maximum loss based on a 1 in 250 year event) to a maximum
of 20% of its shareholders equity, often operating below
this level. As part of the IPC/Max Plan, we have discussed
continuing to have a significant presence in the property
catastrophe market while on a combined equity basis adhering to
this same 20% risk tolerance. In contrast, Validus maintains
peak exposures where the probable maximum loss based on a 1 in
250 year event runs at a stated 33% of shareholders
equity. Max believes that combining this risk profile with IPC
would expose IPC shareholders to an even greater level of
volatility than at present and would not change the markets
perception of IPC as being a property catastrophe company. The
volatility of Validus results would also seem to be cause
for concern, particularly when the net losses from Hurricanes
Ike and Gustav (which approximated a 1 in 15 year event)
was 12.4% of shareholders equity, the highest among its
broader peer group. This compared to a net loss of 6.7% of
shareholders equity for IPC and 3.4% for Max.
9. Max has a proven, long-term history of successful
acquisitions without incurring goodwill. We believe
IPCs shareholders can take comfort in Maxs
demonstrated history of successfully entering new business lines
through acquisitions and
start-ups
without incurring meaningful goodwill. For example, when Max
entered the Lloyds market, we booked intangible assets of
$8 million upon closing our acquisition of Imagine Group
(UK) Limited, which stands in contrast to the $154 million
of intangible assets booked by Validus in their acquisition of
Talbot.
10. Max has a diversified shareholder base. We
believe having a shareholder base dominated by five private
equity owners controlling 64.9% of Validus total
beneficial ownership (as of March 13, 2009) will limit
the potential upside in the value of Validus over time as these
private shareholders seek to exit their investment. Max has a
diversified shareholder base with an 84% public float. In
addition, Max has a well diversified shareholder base of high
quality institutional shareholders.
11. IPC and Max have compatible cultures. IPC
and Max have compatible cultures that will help ease the
integration of the two companies. IPC and Max share a common
focus on underwriting, claims and actuarial disciplines, and on
running our respective businesses as meritocracies.
12. Maxs higher asset leverage provides greater
investment income over time. Max believes that
investment leverage (invested assets as a multiple of
shareholders equity) is a positive in driving earnings and
stability of returns on capital over time. Based on 2008
figures, Max had total investment to equity of 4.2x versus 1.7x
for Validus. As Validus continues to pursue a short-tail
strategy, Validus will be limited in its ability to increase its
asset leverage. This deprives IPC of the meaningful investment
income derived from longer-tail casualty lines and continues to
leave IPC shareholders exposed to increased volatility from
catastrophes. Validus has commented on Maxs investment
portfolio, particularly its alternative investment portfolio.
Maxs year end allocation to alternative investments was
14% of total invested assets, which is expected to reduce to 10%
to 12% in 2009. In looking at results, Maxs total
investment return, including realized and unrealized gains and
losses, during the very volatile period of 2007 / 2008
has outperformed Validus in 6 of the last 8 quarters.
We believe that the facts regarding the proposal submitted by
Validus and the attempt by Validus to present a one-sided
proposal to IPC shareholders make it clear that Validus has not
presented a Superior Proposal, nor one that can be reasonably
expected to lead to a Superior Proposal. We believe Validus has
created an unnecessary and unproductive disruption for its own
opportunistic purposes, which should not distract either
IPCs or Maxs employees and customers from our
amalgamation, which we both believe to be in the best interests
of our shareholders.
-52-
Lastly, Max remains both steadfast in its commitment and excited
to complete its planned amalgamation with IPC. We continue to
believe that the amalgamation of IPC and Max represents the best
strategic and financial opportunity for our collective
shareholders.
Very truly yours,
W. Marston Becker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Max Capital Group Ltd.
In the afternoon on April 2, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
IPCs board of directors addressing the claims made by Max
in its letter to IPCs board of directors in the morning on
April 2, 2009. The text of our letter reads as follows:
April 2,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Members of the Board:
We are writing to respond to the letter sent to you by
Mr. Becker of Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max)
dated April 2, 2009, regarding the purported benefits of
the proposed combination of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC)
with Max (pursuant to an Amalgamation Agreement between Max and
IPC dated as of March 2, 2009 (the Amalgamation
Agreement)), as compared to the benefits presented by a
combination of IPC with Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) on the terms we proposed to you in our
letter dated March 31, 2009 (the Validus
Proposal).
First, we would like to reiterate our sincere belief that the
Validus Proposal is in every respect a Superior Proposal as
defined in the Amalgamation Agreement. In fact, as you have
undoubtedly seen, the markets have already endorsed our
proposal: the IPC share price has increased significantly since
the announcement of our proposal, in recognition of the fact
that our proposal delivers superior value to the IPC
shareholders an irrefutable fact. Our proposal
offers the IPC shareholders superior value (an 18% premium to
the value of the IPC stock on the date prior to our
announcement), a currency with superior trading characteristics
(Validus shares trade at a premium to book value, as opposed to
the Max shares, which trade at a discount to book value), less
balance sheet risk, and most importantly, superior long term
prospects.
Max suggests that the choice you are facing is between
(i) a combined company based on a shared vision in which
you, the IPC Board, can continue your stewardship, and
(ii) an entity which offers you few benefits over what you
have today, with no ability to continue your stewardship. We
view the choice quite differently: you can choose to combine
with a company which, on almost every metric, is a worse choice
for your shareholders, or ours, which delivers, immediately and
in the long term, superior value for your shareholders. To the
extent that you, the members of the IPC Board, have an interest
in continuing involvement in the affairs of the combined
company, we would be happy to discuss continued Board
representation with you.
Turning now to the assertions in the Max letter, we note that
Max has made a number of statements which distort the facts and
present an incomplete picture. We would like to respond to each
of these in turn.
1. A combination with Max delivers 29% more
tangible book value per share to IPC. Max
believes book value per share is a very important measure in our
industry, and we do not disagree. The relevant question
-53-
for the IPC Board, however, is not, as Max suggests, the
relative percentage of book value being delivered to IPC
shareholders in the two proposals, but the absolute value of the
shares themselves. On this measure, the Validus proposal is
clearly superior, as it offers IPC shareholders a significant
premium over the current value of their shares. Moreover, Max
does not explain in its letter why Maxs shares are trading
at such a deep discount to its book value. We can only guess
that the market assigns such a discount because of Maxs
stewardship of its business or because so much of Maxs
investment portfolio is tied up in risky alternative assets.
Indeed, of Maxs $1.2 billion of tangible common
equity, $754 million is in alternative assets, which in
2008 generated mark downs of $233 million, greater than the
entirety of Maxs underwriting income, and
$476 million is in non-agency asset/mortgage backed
securities. We believe it is a far better value proposition for
the IPC shareholders to receive Validus shares, a currency which
the market values at a premium to book.
2. The IPC/Max Plan creates significant value for
IPC shareholders. This statement is simply
incorrect. According to data calculated from the proxy statement
filed by IPC on March 27, 2009, IPCs book value per
share would decrease from $33.00 to $32.30, or 2.1% as a result
of the combination with Max (this obviously implies the deal is
accretive to Max at your expense). That can hardly be described
as the best opportunity to deliver shareholders
value. Moreover, while it is true that the Validus
proposal delivers an immediate premium for IPC shareholders, it
wrong of Max to suggest that such a premium will compromise
value creation for IPC shareholders in the longer term. We
believe that receiving a better currency, in a stronger, better
capitalized company, offers a more likely starting point for
long term value creation than retaining shares in IPC, whose
previously conservatively managed balance sheet will be
negatively impacted by assets of questionable value in the
IPC/Max combination.
3. Max is a truly diversified underwriting
platform. We think the relevant question
for IPC is not whether its merger partner has a diversified
platform, but rather the quality of that diversification. In
terms of the quality of diversification, Validus offers far
superior characteristics than Max, as evidenced by 2008 results
for Maxs diversified businesses. Maxs
2008 reported 91.9% property and casualty GAAP combined ratio
benefited from $107.0 million of prior-year reserve
releases. The true 2008 accident-year GAAP combined ratio was
103.4%.7Maxs
diversified businesses represent diversification
without profit. Maxs chief source of diversifying growth,
Max US Specialty, generated a 138.5% combined ratio in 2008.
Results such as those cannot create value for
shareholders.8
Max is not a leader in any category of business, and moreover,
it has chosen to focus on volatile lines of business which yield
low
margins.9
In contrast, Validus is a global leader in very profitable
business lines, including marine, energy and war and
terrorism.10
Furthermore, Maxs statement that Validus is constrained by
its limited underwriting platforms is demonstrably untrue.
Validus has the global licenses and other capabilities in place
to write long tail insurance if and when it believes doing so
would be profitable. In fact, today, Validus writes
non-catastrophe business in 143 countries around the
7 Upon
verification of the calculations used to prepare this letter we
have determined that Maxs true 2008 accident year GAAP
combined ratio is in fact 110.6% rather than 103.4% as set forth
in our letter reprinted above. The combined ratio, expressed as
a percentage, is a key measurement of profitability
traditionally used in the property-casualty insurance business.
The combined ratio, also referred to as the calendar year
combined ratio, is the sum of the losses and loss
adjustment expense ratio and the underwriting and other
operating expense ratio. The losses and loss adjustment expense
ratio is the percentage of net losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred to net premiums earned. The underwriting and
other operating expense ratio is the percentage of underwriting
and other operating expenses to net premiums earned. When the
calendar year combined ratio is adjusted to exclude prior period
items, such as loss reserve development, it becomes the
accident year combined ratio.
8 As
described elsewhere in this proxy statement, a combined ratio of
greater than 100% indicates that premiums are less than
aggregate claims and expenses. Validus believes that
unprofitable operations do not create value for shareholders.
9 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be
qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry.
10 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be
qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry.
-54-
world.11
And, as demonstrated by Validus superior financial results and
lower combined ratio, Validus does so profitably.
4. Max has a proven, long-term, operating
history. Max may have a longer history than
Validus, but even a cursory look at the decline in Maxs
book value, its weak growth, volatile results and general
underperformance will quash any notion that the length of its
operating history trumps the superior abilities of the deeply
experienced Validus management team to generate best in class
performance.
By focusing on the net loss reported by Validus based on
hurricanes Ike and Gustav, Max is yet again ignoring the larger
benefit of Validus conservative risk management and
diversification. Validus assumed that the hurricane season in
2008 would generate a market loss of $18 to $21 billion,
and we set our reserve levels accordingly. IPC, by contrast,
assumed $14.5 billion of losses. Notwithstanding the
severity of the events of that hurricane season, Validus was
easily able to absorb the loss (yielding a combined ratio of
92.2%, with a corresponding combined ratio at Validus Re of
86.0%). As a result, Validus was profitable, notwithstanding the
losses associated with hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Its highly
touted diversification notwithstanding, Max sustained a loss for
the year in excess of $200 million, demonstrating beyond a
shadow of a doubt that its greater diversification
is not a guarantee of profitability.
We at Validus believe that our diversification is of a higher
quality, our underwriting decisions are made more carefully, our
risks are managed more prudently, and we exercise a more
conservative stewardship over our capital, all of which would
inure to the long term benefit of the IPC shareholders in our
proposed combination.
5. IPC and Max can complete an amalgamation more
quickly, with greater certainty. Max now
claims (contrary to the statements it made prior to the Validus
Proposal)12
that Max and IPC will be able to close their amalgamation in
June 2009. Max freely admits, however, that it does not control
the time table: the SEC must clear the proxy
statement/prospectus filed by IPC, it must clear the proxy
statement for Max, and the parties must obtain shareholders
approval (which we believe will be difficult to do while our
Superior Proposal is pending). Most importantly, the closing of
the IPC/Max transaction requires regulatory approvals from
several different state insurance departments in the United
States. Implicit in Maxs prediction of a closing date is a
presumption of the receipt of regulatory approvals, which simply
cannot be taken for granted given the likely timing of
regulatory review and the public hearing process. Thus there is
absolutely no guarantee that the IPC/Max deal can be consummated
in the second quarter. Finally, it is important for the IPC
Board not to lose sight of the fact that the Amalgamation
Agreement cedes to Max the power to delay the closing of a
Validus/IPC
combination.13
Max also tries to make an issue of the fact that IPC has not had
a chance to conduct due diligence on Validus. Validus would
welcome the opportunity to provide IPC with customary due
diligence information. Validus stands ready to respond to any
requests IPC may make on an expedited basis, and would be more
than happy to meet with IPC to answer any questions IPC may have
about Validus, its operations, its financial health or any other
matter relevant to the Board of IPC in considering Validus
Superior Proposal. We call upon Max to permit IPCs Board
to exercise its fiduciary duties by releasing IPC from the
extraordinarily restrictive
11 Upon
verification, the statement should refer to 134 countries,
rather than 143.
12 IPC
and Max may update their predictions as to timing as new
information becomes available to each party. For example, in a
recent letter to shareholders filed on May 1, 2009, Max
discloses that it expects the transaction to close late in
the second quarter or early in the third quarter of 2009.
13 Prior
to its termination, the Max Amalgamation Agreement ceded to Max
the power to delay the closing of a Validus/IPC combination
because IPC had no right to terminate the Max Amalgamation
Agreement until after the vote of the IPC shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting, even if the IPC board of directors
changed its recommendation and recommended a vote
FOR the Validus Amalgamation Offer. Accordingly, had
the IPC board of directors chosen to recommend a vote
FOR the Validus Amalgamation Offer, Max would have
had the power to delay the closing of a Validus/IPC combination
by not terminating the IPC/Max agreement until after the
shareholders voted down the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
-55-
prohibition in the Amalgamation Agreement which prevents it from
even talking to Validus regarding the terms of its Superior
Proposal.14
6. Maxs business is complementary to
IPC. Maxs assertions that a
combination of Validus and IPC would result in a loss of
customers are without merit and are particularly surprising,
given that Max has publicly stated its intention to
significantly reduce IPCs core reinsurance activities. As
we are both aware, the current reinsurance market is in the
midst of a capacity
shortage.15
As a result, we do not believe that clients will actively seek
to diversify their reinsurance placements away from our combined
company. In fact, our combined financial strength and clout
should only serve to make a combined Validus/IPC a
go-to player for reinsurance
placements.16
7. Maxs complementary and diversified
platform is appreciated by our ratings
agencies. We have been in dialogue with our
ratings agencies with regard to our proposal. We encourage the
Board of IPC to focus its attention on what the ratings agencies
actually say, rather than on Maxs
speculations.17
8. Max maintains less underwriting volatility
through greater diversification in its portfolio of
risks. Due to the significant investment
losses Max sustained in 2008, it is unsurprising that Max is
attempting to focus on underwriting volatility alone.
Selectively focusing on underwriting volatility wholly ignores
the other various risks and uncertainties that IPCs
shareholders would be assuming by combining with Max and its
risky balance sheet. With respect to underwriting performance,
in 2008, Validus successfully weathered its exposures from
Hurricanes Ike and Gustav with a combined ratio of 92.2% and net
income of $63.9 million. This performance was generated
despite the fact that Validus reserved for those events more
conservatively than its industry peers, as discussed in
paragraph 4 above. Validus disclosures offer the
highest level of transparency with regard to its probable
maximum losses, zonal aggregates and realistic disaster
scenarios and we would challenge Max to provide the same level
of transparency to its shareholders before presumptuously
speculating on the impacts of various potential events.
9. Max has a proven, long term history of
successful acquisitions without incurring good
will. Validus has a proven track record of
acquiring a high quality premier business with a leading
position in its market. Maxs pointing to its acquisition
of Imagine Group (UK) Limited as an example of a successful
acquisition is ironic, especially relative to our successful
acquisition of Talbot. In that transaction, Validus acquired a
strong balance sheet with excess reserves at a multiple of 3.1x
earnings demonstrating Validus commitment to creating
value for our shareholders. When we acquired Talbot, Validus
booked $154 million of goodwill and intangible assets;
however, from acquisition closing until December 31, 2008,
we benefited from
14 The
agreement governing the Initial Validus Offer retained this
restrictive prohibition. Validus board of directors
determined that proposing substantially similar agreement terms
with what we believed to be improved economic terms would
facilitate IPCs board of directors evaluation of the
Initial Validus Offer. On May 18, 2009, Validus amended
this provision in the Validus Amalgamation Offer to permit IPC
and its subsidiaries and their respective personnel and
representatives to participate or engage in discussions relating
to an acquisition proposal for IPC so long as IPCs board
of directors has concluded in good faith that such action is
required in order for IPCs directors to comply with
fiduciary duties under applicable law and IPC complies with
certain notification and confidentiality requirements.
15 A
reinsurance industry commentator has recently stated that,
taking reinsurer capital as the nearest proxy for capacity, it
is estimated that reinsurer capital, which was down 8 to
10 percent from January 1, 2008 through
September 30, 2008, will be down 15 to 20 percent for
the year ending December 31, 2008 when reported. In
addition, the same commentator observed that capital markets
capacity for insurance risk has declined in similar proportions.
16 We
believe that a combined Validus/IPC would be a go-to
player for reinsurance placements because Validus will be better
capitalized (as measured by pro forma shareholders equity) than
many of the members of its peer group.
17 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement is intended
to emphasize that Validus believes the statement being referred
to, in the April 2, 2009 Max letter to IPCs board of
directors, was based upon speculation by Max, since, to
Validus knowledge, the rating agencies had not made a
determination in this regard.
-56-
$105 million in reserve releases from the Talbot business,
emanating from periods prior to the acquisition. Maxs
acquisition history, on the other hand, is that of acquiring
subscale small businesses that significantly lag the leaders in
their respective
markets.18
10. Max has a diversified shareholder
base. Maxs attempt to characterize
our shareholder base as a liability is baseless. What is
relevant is the relative liquidity of Max and Validus shares. As
previously mentioned in our letter dated March 31, 2009,
Validus daily average trading volume was
$11.3 million vs. $6.7 million for Max for the three
months prior to announcement of the IPC/Max transaction.
Additionally, since our shareholder base is publicly disclosed,
if the market viewed it as an overhang, such
information would already be embedded in the market price of our
common shares. The combination of our trading volume and the
premium pricing of our shares compared to either Max or IPC
should put to rest any concerns IPC shareholders may have
regarding liquidity of the combined company.
11. IPC and Max have compatible
cultures. Max has mentioned that it has a
compatible culture with IPC. If that is in fact the case, we
find the paucity of IPC management that will continue in senior
roles at IPC/Max curious and an indication that such cultural
fit may be only skin deep. We have successfully integrated large
acquisitions in the past, and believe that experience is most
relevant in this regard.
12. Maxs higher asset leverage provides
greater investment income over
time. Maxs asset leverage has been a
significant liability given its risky investment
strategy.19
This leverage would similarly expose a combined IPC/Max to
significant volatility. Maxs alternative investments and
non-agency asset/mortgage backed securities alone comprise 99%
of its tangible equity, indicating a massive amount of embedded
risk.20
Maxs $233 million loss in 2008 on their alternative
investment portfolio is entirely indicative of that risk. Its
so-called outperformance in 6 of the last 8 quarters
ignores the abject underperformance it experienced in other
periods.21
In 2007, when the global credit crisis began, Maxs current
management had the opportunity to liquidate its alternative
assets. Max chose to continue holding those risky investments,
which have led to massive losses. Combined, we believe these
factors highlight Maxs poor history as stewards of
shareholder capital.
* * *
In closing, I would like to reiterate that we have submitted to
you a proposal which we are confident the IPC Board will agree
is a Superior Proposal as defined in your
Amalgamation Agreement. We have submitted this proposal because
we deeply and honestly believe that the combination of IPC and
Validus will result in a far better value proposition for the
IPC shareholders than the combination of IPC and Max. Validus is
absolutely committed to our Superior Proposal and we simply do
not understand how Max can characterize our actions as
opportunistic. If Max truly believes its combination
with IPC is superior, we call upon Max to free
18 As
of the date of this proxy statement, we are aware of only three
small acquisitions by Max and we believe, based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry, that the acquired
entities were not leaders in their markets.
19 As
of the date of this proxy statement, we believe that the
investment strategy that has been employed by Max, and was
expected to be employed by Max management who would have
controlled the combined IPC/Max, and that according to
Maxs public information was expected to include a 10% to
12% concentration in alternative investments, should be
considered a risky investment strategy that could have amounted
to a significant liability when compared with an investment
strategy, like Validus, that does not allow for such
investments in alternative investments.
20 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement is intended
to emphasize that Maxs alternative investments alone
comprised 61% of tangible equity, indicating what we believe to
be a significant amount of embedded risk.
21 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be
qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry and on Maxs
investment performance in the third and fourth quarters of 2008,
which was worse than the average for its peer group but better
than the investment performance of several of its peers.
-57-
the IPC Board from the shackles that your Amalgamation Agreement
has placed on the ability of the members of the IPC Board to
exercise their fiduciary duties under Bermuda law, so as to
create a level playing field on which the shareholders of IPC
will be able to decide which of the two proposals is indeed
superior.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
-58-
In the afternoon on April 5, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
IPCs board of directors regarding an error that Max had
made in its calculation of pro forma tangible book value under
the terms of the Initial Validus Offer. The text of our letter
reads as follows:
April 5,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Members of the Board:
We are writing to call to your attention an error contained in
the publicly disseminated letter sent to you by Mr. Becker
of Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max) dated April 2,
2009 and the accompanying presentation materials, regarding the
purported benefits of the proposed combination of IPC Holdings,
Ltd. (IPC) with Max (pursuant to an Amalgamation
Agreement between Max and IPC dated as of March 2, 2009
(the Amalgamation Agreement)), as compared to the
benefits presented by a combination of IPC with Validus
Holdings, Ltd. (Validus) on the terms we proposed to
you in our letter dated March 31, 2009 (the Validus
Proposal).
In his letter, Mr. Becker states (and he has been widely
quoted in the media stating) that [a] combination with
Max delivers 29% more tangible book value per share to
IPC. This is not correct. We, and our financial
advisors and SEC counsel, have reviewed this calculation and we
would like to provide you with the correct figures.
Specifically, Mr. Beckers calculation understates the
pro forma IPC share of Validus tangible book value per share by
$2.74, which results in overstating the premium calculated on
this basis quite significantly. We have attached some materials
that illustrate the correct calculation. Our SEC counsel has
advised us that this error is material and that Max will be
required to amend its SEC filings to correct its error.
As we noted in our letter dated April 2, 2009, putting
aside this error, we believe that this measure is the wrong
framework on which to analyze whether the IPC/Max plan is
superior to the IPC/Validus plan, and refer you to the analysis
in our earlier letter. We remain confident that the IPC Board
will agree the Validus Proposal is a Superior
Proposal as defined in your Amalgamation Agreement.
We look forward to your response to the Validus Proposal.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
cc: Marty Dolan, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
In the afternoon on April 5, 2009, Validus also posted the
material referenced in the letter on its website.
On the morning of April 6, 2009, Max issued a press release
reaffirming its prior disclosure regarding the Initial Validus
Offer and stating that it continues to believe that
Validus had not presented a Superior Proposal, nor
-59-
one that can be reasonably expected to lead to a Superior
Proposal (as such term is defined in the [Max Amalgamation
Agreement]). The text of the press release reads as
follows:
Max Capital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:MXGL; BSX: MXGL BH) today
confirmed that the calculations of diluted book value per IPC
share and diluted tangible book value per IPC share included in
Maxs April 2, 2009 letter to the Board of Directors
of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC) are true and correct.
Max has consulted with its financial advisors and SEC counsel.
In a press release dated April 5, 2009, Validus alleged
that Max had made a substantial error in its
calculation of pro forma tangible book value under
the proposed terms of Validuss unsolicited takeover of
IPC. However, Validuss allegation is incorrect and
misleading. The calculations that Max presented accurately
represent what an IPC shareholder would receive on a stand alone
basis from either Max or Validus, without giving effect to what
IPC itself contributes to a transaction. The Max presentation
allows IPC shareholders to compare the value received under each
transaction on an apples-to-apples basis. Max
believes this is an important measure in comparing the value
received today by an IPC shareholder under the agreement with
Max and the proposed Validus transaction. The pro forma
calculations Validus is utilizing include the additional benefit
derived from issuing Validus shares to purchase IPC at a
discount to book value.
One has to question whether the IPC shareholders are being
well served by the non-substantive claims being initiated by
Validus. They have made certain statements that completely
misrepresent and falsely characterize the information presented
by Max. Since Validus initially made its below book value,
unsolicited takeover offer for IPC, it has demonstrated a lack
of understanding of what is important to the shareholders of IPC
in allowing them to assess the relative value being delivered by
Max versus Validus, stated W. Marston (Marty) Becker, Max
Chairman and CEO.
The facts presented in Maxs April 2, 2009 letter to
IPC have not changed and are clear:
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Max delivers to IPC $33.83 of diluted tangible book value per
IPC share a 29.2% premium versus $26.19 delivered by
Validus, and
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
Max delivers to IPC $34.93 of diluted book value per IPC
share a 23.2% premium versus $28.35 delivered by
Validus.
|
As noted above, these figures represent the book value per IPC
share being delivered to IPCs shareholders on a standalone
basis, without giving effect to what IPC itself contributes to a
transaction.
The conclusion remains clear a combination with Max
provides greater underlying value to IPCs shareholders
today, with true diversification of underwriting exposures and
without an over-concentration in short-tail catastrophe oriented
business, and will result in greater upside for IPC shareholders
as compared to the hostile takeover proposal by Validus.
Max continues to believe that Validus has not presented a
Superior Proposal, nor one that can be reasonably expected to
lead to a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the
IPC/Max Plan of Amalgamation dated March 1, 2009).
Additional details on the Max calculations referred to above are
posted on [Maxs] website: www.maxcapgroup.com.
-60-
In the afternoon on April 6, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
IPCs board of directors regarding the Max press release
and issued a press release announcing the letter. The text of
our letter reads as follows:
April 6,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Members of the Board:
The difficulty of being unable to speak directly has lead to an
exchange of press releases, which is unfortunate. In this
context, we would like to respond to the Max statement issued
this morning by describing the analytical framework we believe
is appropriate.
In todays press release, Max modified its description of
its calculation of pro forma book value per share. In essence,
the Max calculation now describes what an IPC shareholder would
receive on a standalone basis from either Validus or Max. We
disagree with this basis for valuation. Our approach is focused
on a comparison of what an IPC shareholder would own as a result
of either transaction.
However, if we were to follow the Max approach, we would note
that there are a number of adjustments contemplated in the
proposed IPC/Max Amalgamation Agreement, which would reduce the
standalone
value22
that Max delivers by $117.4 million. The joint proxy
statement/prospectus filed by IPC and Max references, among
other adjustments, the need to increase Max loss reserves
for annuity claims as well as property and casualty claims by
$130.0 million. As a result, the Max book value delivered
would be reduced by $2.06 per Max share, resulting in a book
value delivered of $20.40 per share, on the basis of Maxs
calculation of diluted book value.
I would also note that Validus and Max use differing accounting
conventions for calculating diluted book value per share. While
each is valid, on the basis upon which Validus calculates
diluted book value per share, the Max value delivered would be
$19.68 after a $1.81 per share reduction in book value.
We have provided the attached schedule of our calculations in an
effort to be as transparent as possible in our communication
with you.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
cc: Marty Dolan, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
22 If
the adjustments to reduce the net asset value of Max were made,
it would reduce by $117.4 million the book value that Max
contributes to the combined company at closing.
-61-
Adjustments
to Max Book Value Upon Combination with IPC
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share values)
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value of net assets acquired prior to fair value
adjustments(1)
|
|
$
|
1,280.3
|
|
Preliminary adjustments for fair value
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to deferred acquisitions costs(2)
|
|
|
(51.3
|
)
|
Adjustment to goodwill and intangible assets(3)
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to reserve for property and casualty losses and loss
adjustment expenses(4)
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to life and annuity benefits(4)
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to unearned property and casualty premiums(5)
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
Adjustment to senior notes(6)
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(117.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
1,162.9
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
$
|
(117.4
|
)
|
Max diluted shares outstanding(7)
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment per diluted share
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Note 1 to unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information of IPC in
Form S-4
filed
3/27/2009
(S-4).
Notes 1-6
are excerpts from the
S-4.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents historical net book value of Max.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents adjustment to reduce the deferred acquisition costs
of Max to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Represents adjustment to reduce goodwill and intangible assets
of Max to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
(4)
|
The fair value of Maxs reserve for property and casualty
losses and loss adjustment expenses, life and annuity benefits,
and loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable were estimated
based on the present value of the underlying cash flows of the
loss reserves and recoverables. In determining the fair value
estimate, IPCs management estimated a risk premium deemed
to be reasonable and consistent with expectations in the
marketplace given the nature and the related degree of
uncertainty of such reserves. Such risk premium exceeded the
discount IPCs management would use to determine the
present value of the underlying cash flows.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Represents the estimated fair value of the profit within
Maxs unearned property and casualty premiums. In
determining fair value, IPCs management estimated the
combined ratio associated with Maxs net unearned property
and casualty premiums.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Represents adjustment to record Maxs senior notes to their
estimated fair value at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Common shares outstanding plus the gross amount of all warrants,
options, restricted shares, RSUs, restricted common shares and
performance share units outstanding as of the 12/31/2008 balance
sheet date. (Source: Max 2008
Form 10-K)
|
-62-
In the afternoon on April 7, 2009, Kenneth L. Hammond,
Chairman of IPCs board of directors, sent a letter to
Mr. Noonan indicating that IPCs board of directors
had reaffirmed its recommendation to combine with Max. The text
of the letter reads as follows:
April 7,
2009
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Validus Holdings Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Dear Mr. Noonan:
I am writing to respond to your letter of March 31, 2009,
submitting an offer pursuant to which Validus would combine with
IPC.
IPCs board of directors, after careful consultation with
management and our financial and legal advisors, has unanimously
concluded that the Validus proposal does not constitute a
Superior Proposal as defined in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation with Max Capital Group Ltd. dated March 1,
2009. Furthermore, IPCs board of directors has unanimously
reaffirmed its recommendation that IPC shareholders vote in
favor of the transaction with Max.
In reaching its decision, IPCs board of directors
considered several factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Validus Offer Fails to Meet IPCs Diversification
Goals During 2008, IPCs board of directors
concluded that it would be in IPCs best interest to
diversify beyond its monoline property catastrophe business
model in order to reduce the volatility inherent in focusing on
catastrophe reinsurance and to spread our risk base across less
correlated risks. A key factor in our decision to choose Max
over other options is our belief that Maxs diversified
operations offer the best path to achieve this goal. The
decision was the result of a robust and thorough review of
strategic alternatives. A transaction with Validus would not
accomplish that strategic objective given Validus
substantial correlated catastrophe exposure.
|
|
|
|
The Max Transaction Has Significant Value Creation Potential and
Upside for IPC Shareholders The combination with Max
has the potential to create significant value for IPC
shareholders, as detailed in the filed
S-4
registration statement dated March 27, 2009. It also
provides greater book value per share to IPC shareholders.
Furthermore, Maxs balance sheet has significantly lower
goodwill and intangibles, resulting in an even greater tangible
book value per share to IPCs shareholders. We are
concerned that Validus proposal enables Validus to raise
capital at a discount to book value at the expense of IPC
shareholders, on the other hand, the combination with Max allows
deployment of capital under a combined business plan that
benefits IPCs shareholders. Maxs diversified book,
when combined with IPCs, has the potential to reduce
earnings volatility. Earnings volatility affects share price
volatility, ratings and other important financial measures. A
combination with Max carries less risk, as this combination is
less exposed to catastrophe events and other risk
concentrations. On the other hand, Validus earnings and
share price are more affected by catastrophe losses. At the time
of the Validus offer, its share price was near the high end of
its 52-week trading range, resulting in an exchange ratio that
poses potential downside risk to IPC shareholders. In contrast,
we entered into the transaction with Max at an exchange ratio
determined at a time that Max was trading at 53% of its 52-week
high.
|
|
|
|
The Validus Amalgamation Proposal Is Less Certain, Is
Riskier for IPCs Shareholders and Would Take Longer to
Close We currently expect to be able to complete the
transaction with Max in June, with all regulatory approvals
obtained. In contrast, in our view, any transaction with Validus
likely could not be completed before September, right in the
middle of the wind season. Our transaction with Max would have
to be rejected by IPC shareholders before IPC would be able to
conduct due diligence on
|
-63-
|
|
|
|
|
and negotiate with Validus. There is no assurance IPC would, at
that time, choose to enter into a transaction with Validus. Even
if IPC were to proceed with Validus at that time, Validus and
IPC would both need to obtain consents under their credit
facilities before the deal could close, whereas no such
additional consents would be necessary to close the IPC/Max
transaction. Validus and IPC would also need to achieve
satisfactory indications from the ratings agencies regarding the
ratings outcomes of such a combination.
|
Given these considerations and others, the board of directors
unanimously determined that the Validus proposal does not
constitute a Superior Proposal as defined in our amalgamation
agreement with Max. IPC remains committed to completing our
transaction with Max, which we believe will create a diversified
and balanced platform for growth that should drive stronger
performance and value for shareholders for many years.
Sincerely,
/s/ Kenneth
L. Hammond
Kenneth L. Hammond
Chairman of the Board of Directors
On Behalf of the IPC Holdings Board of Directors
In the afternoon on April 8, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
Mr. Hammond, the Chairman of IPCs board of directors,
regarding the IPC press release and letter and issued a press
release announcing the letter. The text of the letter reads as
follows:
April 8, 2009
Kenneth L. Hammond
Chairman
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Mr. Hammond,
I am writing in response to your letter of April 7, 2009,
in which you confirm the continuing support of the IPC board for
the Max takeover of IPCs operations.
I am disappointed with the Boards decision and
respectfully disagree with your assessment of our Superior
Proposal. I am confident that had your Amalgamation Agreement
with Max allowed you to engage in dialogue with us, you would
have instead supported the Validus Superior Proposal on behalf
of your shareholders. In particular, although you cite a
robust and thorough review of strategic
alternatives, I am greatly disappointed that you never invited
us to participate in that process, although you spoke with
numerous potential buyers. To the extent that Max will release
you from the restrictive terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, we
continue to stand ready to discuss your objectives and how our
business meets those objectives. Until you agree to discuss our
proposal with us, we have no choice except to communicate
directly with your shareholders. We believe the facts will
demonstrate that our proposal is truly a Superior Proposal.
We hereby advise the shareholders of IPC that:
1. We have retained Georgeson as our proxy solicitor. We
will shortly file proxy solicitation materials with the SEC and
those materials will contain, among other things, the many
reasons why we believe you should vote against the Max takeover.
Once the proxy is effective, Georgeson will be in touch with
IPCs shareholders to solicit their votes AGAINST the Max
takeover. If, as we
-64-
[hope]23,
IPCs shareholders vote down the Max takeover, you will be
unencumbered by the restrictive Amalgamation Agreement and free
to execute the Validus Agreement.
2. In our capacity as an IPC shareholder, we object to the
punitive nature of the $50 million Max Termination Fee. The
Termination Fee is an unenforceable penalty under Bermuda law
and we are commencing litigation to reduce this penalty. If
successful,24
we will permit IPC to pay the amount by which such penalty is
reduced as a dividend to IPC shareholders, so that IPC
shareholders and not Max or Validus
shareholders will share in the value obtained.
I regret that the terms of the Max takeover preclude the
management teams of IPC and Validus from cooperating in
delivering a superior outcome for IPC shareholders, but we are
pleased to work directly with your shareholders to achieve the
same end. We remain fully committed to our proposal.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
On April 9, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy
statement with the SEC which, in its definitive form, is being
used to solicit votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed
Max Amalgamation.
On April 13, 2009, IPC filed an amendment (Amendment
No. 1) to the IPC/Max
S-4, which,
among other things, added to the disclosure regarding the
background to the Proposed Max Amalgamation including the
reasons as to why Validus was excluded from the process that
resulted in the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Amendment No. 1
also contained a correction to IPCs diluted book value for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
On April 16, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy
statement with respect to soliciting votes from Validus
shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in
connection with the Acquisition.
On April 21, 2009, Validus filed an amendment with the SEC
to the preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting
votes from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed the Bermuda Claim (as
defined below) in the Supreme Court of Bermuda.
On April 28, 2009, IPC filed a second amendment to the
IPC/Max S-4
with the SEC.
On April 30, 2009, Validus issued a press release outlining
its three-part plan to expedite the Acquisition.
On April 30, 2009, IPC issued a press release reaffirming
its belief that the Initial Validus Offer did not represent a
superior proposal and that the IPC board of directors continued
to recommend IPC shareholders vote in favor of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment to
its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
23 To
clarify, as of the date of this proxy statement, the word
hope has been inserted to replace the word
expect in this sentence.
24 To
clarify, as of the date of this proxy statement, the reference
to success in this sentence relates to Validus
success in pursuing the litigation strategy referenced in the
immediately prior sentence followed by the successful
consummation of the Acquisition.
-65-
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to expedite
the trial of the Bermuda Claim.
On May 4, 2009, IPC filed a third amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4 with the
SEC.
On May 5, 2009, Validus filed an investor presentation
titled Superior Proposal for IPC Shareholders with
the SEC and on May 6, 2009 filed a revised investor
presentation with the SEC.
On May 6, 2009, Validus filed an amendment with the SEC to
the preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On May 7, 2009, IPC and Max filed a joint proxy
statement/prospectus for the IPC/Max
S-4 with the
SEC and stated that they would mail the joint proxy
statement/prospectus on or about May 7, 2009 to their
respective shareholders of record as of the close of business on
April 28, 2009.
On May 8, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC and commenced mailing definitive proxy
materials and proxy cards to IPC shareholders seeking proxies
from IPC shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 11, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC two amendments
to its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting
votes from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of
Validus Shares in connection with the Acquisition.
On May 11-12, 2009, Validus application to expedite
the trial of the Bermuda Claim was heard by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda. Following the hearing, on May 13, 2009, the Court
denied the application for expedition of the timetable for the
proceedings. While this was not a hearing on the merits of
Validus claims, the Court acknowledged that Validus had
raised serious questions to be tried.
On May 12, 2009, in addition to filing the preliminary copy
of this proxy statement, Validus filed two preliminary proxy
statements with the SEC which, when filed in their definitive
forms, will be used to, respectively: (i) solicit written
requisitions from IPC shareholders to compel the board of
directors of IPC to call the IPC special general meeting and
(ii) solicit votes from IPC shareholders to approve the
Validus Proposals at the IPC special general meeting.
On May 12, 2009, Validus commenced the Exchange Offer.
On May 14, 2009, IPC filed with the SEC a
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
in response to the Exchange Offer reporting that IPCs
board of directors had met on May 13, 2009 and stating
IPCs board of directors recommendation that
IPCs shareholders reject the Exchange Offer and not tender
their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
On May 14, 2009, Validus amended the registration statement
of which the Offer to Exchange is a part.
On May 14, 2009, Validus filed an application to the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to convene the court-ordered IPC
meeting to approve the Scheme of Arrangement.
On May 18, 2009, Validus delivered an offer letter to IPC
advising IPC of an amendment to the terms of the Initial Validus
Offer and containing an amendment to the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement.
Later on May 18, 2009, IPC issued a press release
announcing that its board of directors, along with its legal and
financial advisors, would carefully review the revised terms of
the Validus Amalgamation Offer consistent with its fiduciary
duties and make a formal recommendation to IPC shareholders in
accordance therewith.
Also on May 18, 2009, Validus filed an investor
presentation titled Improved Superior Proposal for IPC
Shareholders with the SEC.
On May 19, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9.
Also on May 19, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its
preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of the Validus
Shares in connection with the Acquisition.
-66-
On May 20, 2009, Validus filed a revised version of its
investor presentation titled Improved Superior Proposal
for IPC Shareholders with the SEC.
On May 21, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
reporting that IPCs board had met on May 20, 2009 and
stating IPCs board of directors recommendation that
IPC shareholders reject the revised terms of the Exchange Offer
and not tender their IPC Shares to Validus pursuant to the
Exchange Offer.
On May 21, 2009, Validus amended the registration statement
of which the Offer to Exchange is a part.
On May 26, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC seeking proxies from Validus shareholders
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the
Acquisition. Validus commenced mailing definitive proxy
materials and proxy cards to Validus shareholders on or about
May 27, 2009.
On May 26, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to this proxy
statement with the SEC.
On May 29, 2009, the Supreme Court of Bermuda issued its
decision on Validus application filed on May 14, 2009
to convene the court-ordered IPC meeting to approve the Scheme
of Arrangement. In the decision, the Court rejected IPCs
primary contention that the Court lacked jurisdiction to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement without approval of
IPCs board of directors, and found that the Scheme of
Arrangement could be approved on behalf of IPC by its
shareholders acting at the IPC special general meeting.
Although, the Court noted in its decision that to pursue a
scheme of arrangement on an unsolicited basis is unprecedented
and presents practical difficulties. The Court, however,
determined not to exercise its discretion to order the
court-ordered IPC meeting (at which the IPC shareholders may
consider and vote on approval of the Validus scheme of
arrangement) in advance of the vote on the Proposed Max
Amalgamation and evidence of IPC shareholder support for the
Scheme of Arrangement and dismissed Validus application.
Based on this decision, and the fact that the IPC shareholders
rejected the Proposed Max Amalgamation at IPCs annual
general meeting on June 12, 2009, Validus will pursue the
Scheme of Arrangement by presenting evidence of IPC shareholder
support to the Court. However, there can be no assurance that
the Court will exercise its discretion to convene such a meeting
on a subsequent application by Validus to the Court.
On June 1, 2009, Validus amended the registration statement
of which the Offer to Exchange is a part.
Also on June 1, 2009, Glass Lewis & Co. and Proxy
Governance Inc. announced their recommendations that the IPC
shareholders vote for the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On June 2, 2009, RiskMetrics Group announced that, after
conducting a comprehensive review of both the Validus
Amalgamation Offer and the Proposed Max Amalgamation, it
recommended that the IPC shareholders vote against the Proposed
Max Amalgamation, and noted in its report that its analysis
suggested that the terms of the Proposed Max Amalgamation as of
such date, at least in terms of current valuation, did not
maximize shareholder value.
On June 4, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to this proxy
statement with the SEC.
On June 5, 2009, IPC reported in its Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 5, 2009 that IPC, IPC Limited and Max entered
into a waiver letter to the Max Amalgamation Agreement pursuant
to which IPC has declared two special one-time dividends for a
total of $2.50 per IPC Share conditional on the occurrence of
the effective time of the Max Amalgamation Agreement and subject
to applicable law.
On June 8, 2009, Validus delivered an offer letter to IPC
advising IPC of the increased economic terms of the Validus
Amalgamation Offer and containing an amendment to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement.
Also on June 8, 2009, Validus filed an investor
presentation titled Analysis of June 4, 2009 Waiver
to Max / IPC Amalgamation Agreement with the SEC.
On June 9, 2009, IPC filed an amendment to its
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
reporting that IPCs board of directors had met on
June 9, 2009 and stating that IPC board of directors
recommendation that IPC shareholders reject the revised terms of
the Exchange Offer and not tender their IPC Shares to Validus
pursuant to the Exchange Offer.
Also on June 9, 2009, RiskMetrics Group reaffirmed its
previous recommendation that IPC shareholders vote against the
Proposed Max Amalgamation.
-67-
On June 10, 2009, Validus filed a supplement to its
definitive proxy statement with the SEC seeking proxies from IPC
shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
Also on June 10, 2009, Validus filed an investor
presentation titled Further Improved Superior
Proposal For IPC Shareholders with the SEC.
Also on June 10, 2009, Glass Lewis & Co. stated
that its original recommendation that IPC shareholders vote for
the Proposed Max Amalgamation remained unchanged.
On June 12, 2009, IPC did not obtain the requisite vote to
approve the Proposed Max Amalgamation at its annual general
shareholder meeting. Approximately 72% of the votes cast at the
IPC annual general meeting voted against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation. Also on June 12, 2009, Max announced that it
had terminated the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
In addition, on June 12, 2009, Validus amended its
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
and the underlying prospectus/offer to exchange and commenced
mailing of its amendment to its prospectus/offer to exchange.
Further on June 12, 2009, Validus filed a supplement to its
definitive proxy statement with the SEC seeking proxies from
Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares
in connection with the Acquisition.
On June 14, 2009, IPC and Validus entered into a mutual
confidentiality agreement.
On June 15, 2009, the Chairman of IPCs board of
directors sent a letter to Validus outlining IPCs views
regarding a possible negotiated transaction with Validus. IPC
also included the letter in a press release.
Also on June 15, 2009, Validus issued a press release
stating that Validus would seek to replace the IPC board of
directors if Validus is unable to reach a negotiated agreement
with the IPC board of directors in a timely fashion. Validus
also announced in the press release that it would continue to
pursue the Exchange Offer and the Scheme of Arrangement even as
Validus seeks to reach a consensual agreement with IPCs
board of directors.
Further on June 15, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to its
preliminary proxy statement with the SEC to solicit requisitions
from IPC shareholders to compel the board of directors of IPC to
call the IPC special general meeting.
On June 16, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC to solicit requisitions from IPC
shareholders to compel the board of directors of IPC to call the
IPC special general meeting.
On June 22, 2009, Validus issued a press release stating
that it had delivered a revised amalgamation agreement to IPC
that addresses concerns articulated by IPC in its June 15,
2009 letter to Validus regarding a possible negotiated
transaction with Validus. Such press release further stated that
Validus will not be revising the economic terms of its offer,
which Validus continues to believe provide full and fair value
for IPC Shares.
On June 23, 2009, Validus filed this amendment to this
proxy statement with the SEC.
Reasons
to Vote FOR the Scheme of Arrangement
Validus believes that the Acquisition represents a compelling
combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable the
combined company to capitalize on opportunities in the global
reinsurance market. Successful completion of the Acquisition
would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the superior growth
potential of a combined company that would be a leading carrier
in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets,
with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification in
profitable business lines. The Validus Shares to be issued and
cash to be paid to IPC shareholders in exchange for IPC Shares
in the Scheme of Arrangement will provide IPC shareholders with
a premium for their shares and will allow IPC shareholders to
participate in the growth and opportunities of the combined
company while receiving cash for a portion of their investment
in IPC Shares. Validus believes that the combination of Validus
and IPC offers a number of benefits to holders of IPC Shares,
including the following:
The
Scheme of Arrangement provides a premium to IPC
shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon closing prices of IPC Shares and Validus Shares
as of March 30, 2009, the last trading day prior to the
announcement of the Initial Validus Offer, the Scheme of
Arrangement would have had a value of $31.73
|
-68-
|
|
|
|
|
per IPC Share, or approximately $1.78 billion in the
aggregate, which represented a 24.9% premium to the trading
value of the IPC Shares as of such date and a 30.8% premium over
$24.26, which was the average closing price of the IPC Shares
between March 2, 2009, the day IPC and Max announced the
Proposed Max Amalgamation, and March 30, 2009, the last
trading day before we announced the Initial Validus Offer. The
premium represented by the Scheme of Arrangement may be larger
or smaller depending on the market price of the IPC Shares and
the Validus Shares at the effective time and will fluctuate
between now and then depending on the market prices. Based upon
the closing prices of IPC Shares and Validus Shares on
June 22, 2009, the last practicable date prior to the
filing of this proxy statement, the Scheme of Arrangement had a
value of $27.26 per IPC Share, or $1.53 billion in the
aggregate, which represented a 2.8% premium to the closing price
of the IPC Shares as of such date and a premium of 7.3% over the
March 30, 2009 closing price of the IPC Shares. In
addition, the meaningful cash component provides IPC
shareholders with the opportunity to achieve immediate liquidity
on a portion of their investment in IPC Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information with respect to the range of closing prices for the
IPC Shares for certain dates and periods is set forth in the
section of this proxy statement entitled Comparative Market
Price and Dividend Information on
page [ ] of this proxy statement. Validus
urges IPC shareholders to obtain a current market quotation for
the IPC Shares.
|
The
Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders as a portion of
the Validus Transaction Consideration pursuant to the Scheme of
Arrangement represent what we believe is an attractive
investment.
|
|
|
|
|
From July 24, 2007 (the date of Validus initial
public offering) through March 30, 2009 (the last trading
day prior to the announcement of the Initial Validus Offer),
Validus Shares have appreciated 13.2%. Based on the closing
price of Validus Shares on March 30, 2009, the last day of
trading prior to Validus announcement of the Initial
Validus Offer, Validus Shares traded at a premium to their
diluted book value and diluted tangible book value of 1.05x and
1.13x, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Between December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2008, and
notwithstanding the significant property catastrophe claim
activity during this period (generated, for instance, by
Hurricanes Ike and Gustav), Validus grew its book value per
share (including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% rate.
Further, as a shareholder of Validus following completion of the
Scheme of Arrangement, you will receive a dividend payable by
Validus at an equivalent annual rate of approximately $0.90 per
IPC Share (based on Validus current annual rate of $0.80
per Validus Share multiplied by the exchange ratio of 1.1234),
compared to the current IPC annual dividend of $0.88 per IPC
Share, in both cases based on the most recent quarterly
dividends declared and paid by each company.
|
A
Validus/IPC combination will have a strong balance sheet with
minimal exposure to risky asset classes.
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the Proposed Max Amalgamation, IPCs
board of directors stated its desire to reduce earnings
volatility through a business combination. Validus holds no
alternative investments in its investment portfolio and has
specific investment policies in place prohibiting it from
investing in those asset classes, which it believes are unduly
risky to its shareholders and policyholders. Validus believes
counterparties will view the strength of Validus balance
sheet very favorably as buyers are rethinking counterparty risk
in the current environment, giving Validus a significant
advantage over many of its competitors. In addition, Validus
does not expect that the combination of Validus and IPC will
require additions or adjustments to IPCs or Validus
existing insurance reserves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, an
IPC/Validus
combination will result in a combined entity with pro forma GAAP
shareholders equity of approximately $3.5 billion as
of December 31, 2008 and $3.6 billion as of
March 31, 2009. Validus believes that a significant capital
base provides an important competitive advantage for companies
in Validus industry, especially given the current economic
climate in which companies face limited access to new capital
and the demand for reinsurance is increasing.
|
Validus
offers IPC a highly experienced, first class management
team.
|
|
|
|
|
Validus offers IPC a highly experienced,
first-class
management team. Validus management team has demonstrated
the ability to execute growth strategies successfully, carefully
manage risk and deliver enhanced shareholder value. Under the
stewardship of its current management, Validus has completed the
|
-69-
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition of Talbot and established a presence in the energy
and aviation markets. Similarly, between December 31, 2005
and December 31, 2008, Validus grew its book value per
share (including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% rate. The
superior performance of the leadership of the Validus management
team is evidenced by the fact that Validus Shares traded at a
premium of 1.05x and 1.13x, respectively, to Validus
diluted book value and diluted tangible book value based on the
closing price of Validus Shares on March 30, 2009. Please
see Information Concerning the Director and Executive
Officers of Validus and Its Subsidiaries Who Are Participants
on Schedule I for more information on our management
team.
|
The
Scheme of Arrangement provides IPC shareholders with an
opportunity for stable, profitable diversification into
attractive business lines and further growth.
|
|
|
|
|
The combined ratio at Validus in 2008, notwithstanding the
unusual concurrence of two major events giving rise to claims
(Hurricanes Gustav and Ike) was 92.2%, indicating profitable
underwriting results. The combined ratio is a commonly used
measure of an insurance companys underwriting
profitability. It is calculated as the sum of an insurers
net loss ratio and its expense ratio. A combined ratio below
100% indicates profitable underwriting; a combined ratio of 100%
or higher indicates that premiums are less than aggregate claims
and expenses. The net loss ratio is calculated by dividing
losses and loss expenses incurred (including estimates for
incurred but not reported losses) by net premiums earned. The
expense ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition costs
combined with general and administrative expenses by net
premiums earned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus is one of the leading providers of short-tail insurance
globally, writing approximately $1.4 billion of gross
premiums, including $1.0 billion of non-catastrophe
business in 2008 in 134 countries around the world from offices
in Bermuda, London, Singapore, New York and Miami. Validus is a
global leader in profitable business lines including marine,
energy and war and terrorism. In independent forecasts conducted
by Willis Re, the Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers and
Aon, the rate trends in business lines which accounted for
approximately 86% of Validus 2008 non-reinsurance gross
written premiums (marine, property, war and terrorism, and
financial institutions) are currently positive. Validus believes
its diverse businesses would be highly complementary with
IPCs existing operations and provide meaningful,
profitable diversification. Validus management team has
consistently articulated Validus business plan: to grow in
profitable segments. It has taken significant steps in this
direction in the last few years. Its acquisition of Talbot in
2007 gave Validus access to a premier underwriting franchise in
the Lloyds syndicate, which has already proven a
profitable investment. In addition, Validus has set the stage
for further organic growth by adding market leading teams in
Latin America and the energy and aviation segments. It has
global licenses that will permit Validus to expand in other
lines if and when the pricing presents a profitable opportunity
to do so. Validus believes that the combination of IPC and
Validus will bolster all of these initiatives and give the
combined company a leading platform and additional opportunities
for growth.
|
Litigation
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed a claim in the Supreme
Court of Bermuda against IPC, IPC Limited and Max (Bermuda
Claim). The Bermuda Claim challenges the validity of the
Max Termination Fee and provisions which restrict the ability of
IPC to discuss competing proposals with third parties
(no-talk provisions) in the Max Amalgamation
Agreement. Further, the Bermuda Claim alleges that by entering
into the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max
Termination Fee and the no-talk provisions and continuing to act
in accordance with the terms of these provisions, the directors
of IPC have acted in breach of their fiduciary or other duties
and not in accordance with the constitution of IPC.
First, pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, in the event
of an unsolicited alternate offer from a third party, the board
of IPC was required to consider whether such a proposal amounts
to a Superior Proposal. The Bermuda Claim alleges,
however, that, without the ability to engage in any discussions
or information exchange with respect to the Acquisition as a
result of the no-talk provisions, the board of IPC was
restricted
and/or
precluded from properly exploring or evaluating whether in fact
any alternate offer was a Superior Proposal. Second, in
the
-70-
event that a Superior Proposal was made and the
directors of IPC varied or altered their recommendation of the
Proposed Max Amalgamation within the contractual closing
deadline, pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, Max would
have been entitled to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement
and collect the Max Termination Fee from IPC. Under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, the Max Termination Fee is $50,000,000.
The Bermuda Claim alleges that this is equivalent to 4.97% of
the aggregate consideration value of $1,005,915,920 of the
Proposed Max Amalgamation, based on the price of Max common
shares on February 27, 2009, the last trading day before
the signing of the Max Amalgamation Agreement. The Bermuda Claim
also alleges that the quantum of the Max Termination Fee is
wholly excessive and was not calculated by reference to the
costs and expenses that would have been expected to be incurred
by Max in the event that the Max Amalgamation Agreement was
terminated and substantially exceeds Maxs anticipated
liability in respect of such costs and expenses, which, based
upon disclosure in the IPC/Max
Form S-4,
was expected to be little more than $10 million. Therefore,
the Max Termination Fee constitutes an unlawful penalty whose
predominant function, the Bermuda Claim alleges, was to deter
IPC or IPC Limited from breaching the Max Amalgamation Agreement
(including by way of recommending a Superior
Proposal to its board of directors).
By agreeing to the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max
Termination Fee and no-talk provisions, as well as by continuing
to act in accordance with their terms, the Bermuda Claim alleges
that the directors of IPC failed to retain sufficient
flexibility to consider and, if thought fit, recommend an offer
which may be more advantageous to IPC shareholders, improperly
fettering their ability to exercise the powers conferred upon
them by the constitution of IPC
and/or act
in the best interests of IPC
and/or its
shareholders. And by doing so, the directors of IPC acted other
than bona fide in the best interest of IPC
and/or for
an improper or collateral purpose, and the Max Termination Fee
and no-talk provisions were therefore beyond the actual or
implied authority of the board of directors of IPC, and as such,
not binding on IPC and unenforceable by Max.
Following the IPC shareholders vote to reject the Max
Amalgamation Agreement on June 12, 2009, Max terminated
this agreement. However, Max claims that the Max Termination Fee
will be payable if a transaction is agreed to or concluded with
Validus within 12 months of the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement.
The Bermuda Claim requests: (1) declaratory relief that:
(a) the Max Termination Fee constitutes an unlawful and
unenforceable penalty, (b) in entering into the Max
Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max Termination Fee and
no-talk provisions, the directors of IPC acted in breach of duty
and otherwise than in accordance with the constitution of IPC,
(c) in continuing to act in accordance with the Max
Termination Fee and no-talk provisions in the Max Amalgamation
Agreement the directors of IPC continue to act in breach of duty
and otherwise than in accordance with the constitution of IPC;
(2) an injunction restraining IPC or IPC Limited from
making any direct or indirect payment to Max pursuant to the Max
Termination Fee
and/or
taking any steps, whether itself, or by its directors, servants,
agents or otherwise to give effect to the no-talk provisions of
the Max Amalgamation Agreement
and/or the
Max Termination Fee; (3) an order that IPC pay the costs of
the proceedings; and (4) any other or further relief the
court may deem just and proper. This litigation is still pending.
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to expedite
the trial of the Bermuda Claim. Validus requested that the
Supreme Court of Bermuda set a schedule permitting a trial to be
conducted commencing on an earlier date than any date on which
IPC seeks to hold its annual general meeting to consider the
proposals related to the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Max and IPC
opposed the application. On May 13, 2009, the Court denied
the application for expedition of the timetable for the
proceedings. While this was not a hearing on the merits of
Validus claims, the Court acknowledged that Validus had
raised serious questions to be tried.
Interests
of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the
Acquisition
Executive
Officers and Directors
The consummation of the Acquisition will not be deemed to be a
change in control impacting grants under any of Validus
long-term incentive or stock option plans, or a change in
control under any employment agreement between Validus and any
of its employees. As a result, no options or other equity grants
held by such persons will vest as a result of the Acquisition.
-71-
Board
and Management Structure of Validus
Pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, upon the effective time
all of Validus current directors and officers will
continue as the directors and officers of Validus. For more
information, see Summary The Scheme of
Arrangement above.
Interests
of IPC Directors and Executive Officers in the
Acquisition
Except for the last sentence of Employment Agreements and
the Proposed Removal of IPC Directors, the following
information is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
Retirement
and Consulting Agreement
James P. Bryce, Chief Executive Officer, President and a
director of IPC, has decided to commence a long contemplated
retirement from IPC, both as an employee and as a member of
IPCs board of directors, effective not later than
June 30, 2009. Mr. Bryce has agreed to provide
consulting services to IPC and to serve as non-executive
Chairman of Max IPC Re during the period from his retirement
through December 31, 2009, unless the period is extended by
mutual agreement of the parties, in order to help accomplish an
efficient transition in connection with the Proposed Max
Amalgamation. IPC entered into the Retirement and Consulting
Agreement with Mr. Bryce. See Compensation of IPCs
Executive Officers Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Employment and Other Agreements in the
IPC/Max S-4.
IPCs Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
John R. Weale, will be appointed acting Chief Executive Officer,
effective July 1, 2009, if the Proposed Max Amalgamation
has not closed by June 30, 2009. The board of directors
will engage an executive search firm to help identify a
successor to Mr. Bryce, as Chief Executive Officer and
President of IPC, including internal and external candidates, in
case the Proposed Max Amalgamation is not completed.
Employment
Agreements
Each of John R. Weale, Peter J. A. Cozens and Stephen F. Fallon
has entered into an employment agreement. See Compensation of
IPCs Executive Officers Compensation
Discussion and Analysis Employment and Other
Agreements in the IPC/Max
S-4. Given
the percentage change in ownership of IPC Shares as a result
thereof, the Acquisition would likely constitute a change in
control under those agreements.
Proposed
Removal of IPC Directors
As part of the Validus Proposals to be considered and voted on
at the IPC special general meeting, Validus may seek the removal
and replacement of each of the IPC directors from his or her
position as a director of IPC. Validus believes that the
proposal to remove and replace the IPC directors from their
positions as directors of IPC would be necessary if the IPC
board of directors remains uncooperative in regards to taking
steps to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement.
Indemnification
and Insurance
IPC maintains standard directors and officers
liability insurance policies under which, pursuant to their
respective retirement and employment agreements,
Messrs. Bryce, Weale, Cozens and Fallon have rights to
indemnification by virtue of their positions as officers
and/or
directors of IPC.
Validus
Shareholder Approval of Share Issuance
The issuance of the Validus Shares in the Acquisition requires
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on a
proposal to approve such issuance at a meeting of the Validus
shareholders. On May 26, 2009, Validus filed a definitive
proxy statement with the SEC with respect to soliciting votes
from Validus shareholders to approve the issuance of the Validus
Shares in the Acquisition. All of the Validus officers,
directors and those shareholders which Validus refers to as its
qualified sponsors (as defined in this proxy
statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have indicated
that they intend to vote the Validus Shares beneficially owned
by them in favor of such
-72-
approval. As of April 30, 2009, these persons and entities
beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the
Validus Shares.
Listing
of Validus Shares
It is a condition to the closing of the Acquisition that the
Validus Shares issuable to IPC shareholders in the Acquisition
and the Validus Shares to be reserved for issuance upon the
exercise of IPC options and the vesting of IPC Shares authorized
to be issued under IPCs outstanding equity compensation
plans shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE,
subject to official notice of issuance.
Delisting
of IPC Shares
Upon completion of the Acquisition, IPC Shares, which are
currently quoted on NASDAQ under the symbol IPCR and
the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol IPCR BH,
will be delisted.
Federal
Securities Law Consequences
The issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of
Arrangement will not be registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act exempts securities
issued in exchange for one or more outstanding securities from
the general requirement of registration where the terms and
conditions of the issuance and exchange of such securities have
been approved by any court of competent jurisdiction, after a
hearing upon the fairness of the terms and conditions of the
issuance and exchange at which all persons to whom such
securities will be issued have a right to appear and to whom
adequate notice of the hearing has been given. The Validus
Shares issued pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement will be
deemed to be registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange
Act by virtue of
Rule 12g-3
under the Exchange Act, without the filing of any Exchange Act
registration statement.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
The Acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting in accordance with FAS 141(R) under which the
total consideration paid in the Acquisition will be allocated
among acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed
liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event
there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition over the fair values, the excess will be accounted
for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting
from the Acquisition will not be amortized but instead will be
tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if
certain indicators are present). In the event that management of
Validus determines that the value of goodwill has become
impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal
quarter in which such determination is made. In the event there
is an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition, the excess will be accounted for as a gain to be
recognized through the income statement at the consummation of
the Acquisition in accordance with FAS 141(R). Validus
anticipates the Scheme of Arrangement will result in an excess
of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed
over total consideration paid.
Plan of
Reorganization
Following the Scheme of Arrangement, as part of an overall plan,
Validus intends to complete a short-form amalgamation between
IPC and another wholly-owned subsidiary of Validus pursuant to
Section 107 of the Companies Act. Following the short-form
amalgamation, IPC and the Validus subsidiary would continue as
one amalgamated company in accordance with the Companies Act.
The Scheme of Arrangement is intended to constitute a plan of
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code, which includes the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form
amalgamation.
-73-
THE
SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT
The following section contains summaries of selected material
provisions of the Scheme of Arrangement. These summaries are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the form of Scheme
of Arrangement which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety and attached to this proxy statement as Annex A.
You should read that document in its entirety because it, and
not this proxy statement or Validus proxy statement for
the IPC special general meeting, is the legal document that
would govern the Scheme of Arrangement.
Purpose;
Effective Time
The Supreme Court of Bermuda ordered the court-ordered IPC
meeting to be held to give the IPC shareholders (other than the
holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their
respective subsidiaries) the opportunity to consider and, if
they so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. Assuming
the Scheme of Arrangement receives the approval of the IPC
shareholders and the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda,
and all the other conditions to the consummation of the
Acquisition are satisfied or, where relevant, waived, including
approval of the Scheme of Arrangement by IPC either by vote of
the IPC board of directors or a vote of IPC shareholders at the
IPC special general meeting, an office copy of the court order
sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be delivered to the
Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time the Scheme of
Arrangement will be effective.
Implementing
the Scheme of Arrangement
A Scheme of Arrangement under Bermuda law is an arrangement
between a company and its shareholders. In order to implement
the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC shareholders must approve the
Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC must
separately approve the Scheme of Arrangement, the IPC
shareholders must approve the Validus Proposals and the Scheme
of Arrangement must be sanctioned by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda. If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of
Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate
approval of IPC of the Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by
either (i) the IPC board of directors voluntarily complying
with the will of the IPC shareholders as expressed at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, or (ii) the shareholders of IPC
approving resolutions at the IPC special general meeting.
At the court-ordered IPC meeting, you will be asked to approve
the consummation of the Acquisition by means of a court
sanctioned scheme of arrangement between IPC and the holders of
IPC Shares pursuant to section 99 of the Companies Act. The
Scheme of Arrangement is set out in full in Annex A to this
proxy statement.
The steps involved in the Scheme of Arrangement are as follows:
(1) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda for an order
giving directions for the holding and conduct of the
court-ordered IPC meeting.
(2) Requisitioning the IPC special general meeting. On June
16, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC a definitive proxy
statement which is being used to solicit written requisitions
from the IPC shareholders to compel the IPC board of directors
to call the IPC special general meeting.
(3) Holding the court-ordered IPC meeting to which this
proxy statement relates to consider and, if the IPC shareholders
so determine, approve the Scheme of Arrangement. The Scheme of
Arrangement must be approved by a majority in number of the
holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value
of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
whether in person or by proxy.
(4) Holding the IPC special general meeting to approve
resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in
connection with implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement.
Approval of each resolution at the IPC special general meeting
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the IPC Shares voting at the meeting, whether in person or by
proxy.
(5) Applying to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement.
(6) Delivering a copy of the order of the Supreme Court of
Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement to the Bermuda
Registrar of Companies.
The purpose of the Scheme of Arrangement is to provide for
Validus to become the owner of the entire issued and
to-be-issued share capital of IPC not already held by Validus,
IPC or their respective subsidiaries. This is to be achieved by
the transfer to Validus (or its nominee(s)) of the IPC Shares
outstanding immediately prior to the
-74-
effective time (excluding any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC
or their respective subsidiaries) in exchange for Validus Shares
and cash upon the Scheme of Arrangement becoming effective.
To become effective, the Scheme of Arrangement requires:
(i) the approval of a majority in number of the holders of
IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC
Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy; (ii) the approval of IPC (either by
IPCs board of directors or by the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the IPC
special general meeting, whether in person or by proxy) and the
approval of the Validus Proposals to be proposed at the IPC
special general meeting; (iii) the satisfaction or, where
relevant, waiver of the other conditions to the effectiveness of
the Scheme of Arrangement; (iv) the sanction of the Supreme
Court of Bermuda; and (v) the delivery of a copy of the
order of the Supreme Court of Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of
Arrangement to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies. For a
description of the Validus Proposals, see Proposals to be
Submitted to IPC Shareholder Vote at the IPC Special General
Meeting; Voting Requirements and Recommendation in
Validus proxy statement for the IPC special general
meeting.
If the IPC shareholders approve the Scheme of Arrangement at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, the separate approval of IPC of the
Scheme of Arrangement can be provided by either (i) the IPC
board of directors voluntarily complying with the will of the
IPC shareholders as expressed at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
or (ii) the shareholders of IPC approving resolutions at
the IPC special general meeting. On June 16, 2009, Validus
filed with the SEC a definitive proxy statement which is being
used to solicit written requisitions from the IPC shareholders
to compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC special
general meeting. Following IPC shareholder approval at both the
court-ordered IPC meeting and the IPC special general meeting,
the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other
conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement,
and the granting of a court order from the Supreme Court of
Bermuda sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement, a copy of the
court order sanctioning the Scheme of Arrangement will be
delivered to the Bermuda Registrar of Companies, at which time
the Scheme of Arrangement will be effective.
Upon the Scheme of Arrangement becoming effective, Validus (or
its nominee(s)) will acquire the IPC Shares fully paid and free
from all liens, equitable interests, charges, encumbrances and
rights of pre-emption and any other interests of any nature
whatsoever and together with all rights attaching thereto
including the right to receive and retain all dividends and
other distributions declared, paid or made thereon, on or after
the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement (other than a
one-time dividend to the holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate
amount not to exceed any reduction in the Max Termination Fee).
Validus will, in consideration for the transfer of the IPC
Shares, and subject as provided in the Scheme of Arrangement,
allot and issue, credited as fully paid, to each holder of IPC
Shares (as appearing in IPCs register of members
immediately prior to the effective time), new Validus Shares on
the following basis:
|
|
|
for each IPC Share
|
|
1.1234 Validus Shares and $3.75 in cash (less any
applicable withholding taxes and without interest)
|
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the Scheme of Arrangement. Instead, any IPC
shareholder who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction
of a Validus Share in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement
will receive cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) in an
amount (without interest) equal to the product obtained by
multiplying (i) the fractional share interest to which such
shareholder would otherwise be entitled (after aggregating all
fractional Validus Shares that would otherwise be received by
such shareholder) by (ii) the closing price of Validus
Shares as reported on the NYSE on the last trading day
immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
With effect from and including the effective time, each existing
certificate representing a holding of IPC Shares shall cease to
be valid in respect of such holding and each holder of IPC
Shares shall be bound at the request of Validus to deliver up
the same to Validus or to any person appointed by Validus to
receive the same for cancellation or to destroy such share
certificates.
Upon the Scheme of Arrangement becoming effective, it will be
binding on all IPC shareholders, whether or not they attended or
voted at the court-ordered IPC meeting or the IPC special
general meeting (and if they attended and voted, whether or not
they voted in favor).
-75-
The Scheme of Arrangement contains a provision for Validus to
consent, on behalf of all persons concerned, to any modification
of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to
the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that the Supreme
Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. If there is any
modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any
condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that
is material to the interests of IPC shareholders, Validus will
amend this proxy statement and advise the IPC shareholders of
such modification, addition or condition in advance of the
court-ordered IPC meeting, in accordance with applicable law.
Once the Scheme of Arrangement is effective, the Courts of
Bermuda will have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine
any suit, action or proceeding and to settle any dispute which
arises out of or is connected with the terms of the Scheme of
Arrangement or their implementation or out of any action taken
or omitted to be taken under the Scheme of Arrangement or in
connection with the administration of the Scheme of Arrangement.
An IPC shareholder who wishes to enforce any rights under the
Scheme of Arrangement after such time must notify Validus in
writing of its intention at least ten business days prior to
commencing a new proceeding. After the effective time of the
Scheme of Arrangement, no shareholder may commence a proceeding
against Validus or IPC in respect of or arising from the Scheme
of Arrangement except to enforce its rights under the Scheme of
Arrangement where Validus or IPC has failed to perform its
obligations under the Scheme of Arrangement.
When, under any provision of the Scheme of Arrangement, a matter
is to be determined by Validus, Validus will have discretion to
interpret those matters under the Scheme of Arrangement in a
manner that it considers fair and reasonable, and its decisions
will be binding on all concerned.
If for any reason the Scheme of Arrangement does not become
effective in accordance with its terms, the Scheme of
Arrangement will not be consummated and IPC Shareholders will
retain their existing holdings of IPC Shares unless either the
Validus Amalgamation Offer or the Exchange Offer is consummated.
The
Meetings to Implement the Scheme of Arrangement
Before the Supreme Court of Bermudas sanction can be
sought for the Scheme of Arrangement, the Scheme of Arrangement
will require approval by the IPC shareholders at the
court-ordered IPC meeting and the approval of the resolutions to
be proposed at the IPC special general meeting. Notice of the
court-ordered IPC meeting is being delivered to you concurrently
herewith. Notice of the IPC special general meeting will be
forwarded to IPC shareholders separately.
(a) The
Court-Ordered IPC Meeting
The court-ordered IPC meeting, which has been convened for
[ ] Atlantic time on [ ], 2009
at [ ], is being held at the direction of the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to seek the approval of IPC
shareholders for the Scheme of Arrangement. Subject to the
following paragraph, all holders of IPC Shares whose names
appear on the register of members of IPC at
[ ] p.m. (Atlantic time) on
[ ] 2009 will be entitled to attend and vote at
the court-ordered IPC meeting in respect of the number of IPC
Shares registered in their name at the relevant time.
At the court-ordered IPC meeting, voting will be by way of poll
and each IPC shareholder (other than holders of any IPC Shares
owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) present
in person or by proxy will be entitled to one vote for each IPC
Share held. The vote required to approve the Scheme of
Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC meeting is a majority in
number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered
IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or
more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, whether in person or by proxy. The holders of IPC
Shares owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries
will not be able to vote those shares at the court-ordered IPC
meeting but Validus will undertake to the Supreme Court of
Bermuda to be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement.
It is important that, for the court-ordered IPC meeting in
particular, as many votes as possible are cast so that the
Supreme Court of Bermuda may be satisfied that there is a fair
and reasonable representation of opinion of the IPC
shareholders. Therefore, whether or not you intend to attend the
court-ordered IPC meeting in person, you are strongly urged to
sign and return your proxy card or voting instruction form as
soon as possible.
-76-
(b) The
IPC Special General Meeting
In addition to the court-ordered IPC meeting, the IPC special
general meeting will be convened to consider and, if the IPC
shareholders so determine, approve resolutions determined by
Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with
implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement. Written
requisitions from IPC shareholders holding at least 10% of the
IPC Shares may compel the IPC board of directors to call the IPC
special general meeting. On June 16, 2009 Validus filed
with the SEC a definitive proxy statement which is being used to
solicit such written requisitions.
At the IPC special general meeting, a vote by a show of hands
will be taken in the first instance on all matters properly
brought before the IPC special general meeting unless a poll is
requested in accordance with the IPC bye-laws. Each IPC
shareholder as of the record date for the IPC special general
meeting, including Validus and its subsidiaries, will be
entitled to attend and vote, either in person or by proxy, at
the IPC special general meeting. Approval of each resolution at
the IPC special general meeting requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the IPC Shares voting at the
meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
Validus will be sending a separate proxy statement and proxy
card to IPC shareholders in respect of the IPC special general
meeting. We urge you to review those materials carefully.
Sanction
of the Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda
Under the Companies Act, the Scheme of Arrangement also requires
the sanction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda. Subject to the
prior satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the other
conditions to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement set
out in this proxy statement, Validus has confirmed that it will
be represented by counsel at the hearing of the Supreme Court of
Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement so as to consent
to the Scheme of Arrangement and to undertake to the Supreme
Court of Bermuda to be bound thereby.
In order to approve the Scheme of Arrangement, the Supreme Court
of Bermuda will consider, among other things, whether the Scheme
of Arrangement is fair to the IPC shareholders. All IPC
shareholders are entitled to attend the Supreme Court of Bermuda
hearing in person or through counsel to support or oppose the
sanctioning of the Scheme of Arrangement.
The Scheme of Arrangement will become effective in accordance
with its terms upon the delivery of an office copy of the
Supreme Court of Bermuda order to the Bermuda Registrar of
Companies for registration.
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will be
binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they attended or
voted in favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered
IPC meeting or of the resolutions proposed at the IPC special
general meeting. If the Scheme of Arrangement does not
become effective by November 30, 2009 (or such later date,
if any, as Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda
may allow), the Scheme of Arrangement will not become effective
and will not be consummated.
Validus
Transaction Consideration
Under the Scheme of Arrangement, at the closing, each IPC Share
immediately prior to the closing (excluding any IPC Shares owned
by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) will be
transferred to Validus in exchange for the Validus Transaction
Consideration.
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the Acquisition. Instead, any IPC shareholder
who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
Validus Share in connection with the Acquisition will receive
cash (rounded to the nearest whole cent) in an amount (without
interest and less any applicable withholding taxes) equal to the
product obtained by multiplying (i) the fractional share
interest to which such shareholder would otherwise be entitled
(after aggregating all fractional Validus Shares that would
otherwise be received by such shareholder) by (ii) the
closing price of Validus Shares as reported on the NYSE on the
last trading day immediately prior to the closing of the
Acquisition.
Validus will appoint BNY Mellon Shareowner Services as exchange
agent to transfer and pay the Validus Transaction Consideration
to persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective
subsidiaries) in exchange for share certificates representing
IPC Shares or for book-entry shares. At or about the effective
time of the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus will deposit with the
exchange agent the cash payable and the Validus Shares issuable
as Validus Transaction Consideration and will
-77-
provide for the cash issuable in lieu of fractional shares.
Promptly after the effective time, the exchange agent will mail
each holder of IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective
subsidiaries) instructions for surrendering share certificates
and book-entry shares and a substitute
Form W-9.
The exchange agent will transfer and pay the Validus Transaction
Consideration, less any applicable withholding taxes, to the
persons holding IPC Shares outstanding immediately prior to the
effective time (other than Validus, IPC or their respective
subsidiaries) promptly following the exchange agents
receipt of the share certificates (or book-entry shares). No
interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable upon the
surrender of any share certificate (or book-entry shares). Until
so surrendered, each such IPC Share certificate (or book-entry
share) will represent after the effective time for all purposes
only evidence of the right to receive such Validus Transaction
Consideration and cash in lieu of fractional shares.
Under the current backup withholding provisions of
U.S. federal income tax law, the exchange agent may be
required to withhold 28% of the amount of any payments pursuant
to the Acquisition. In order to prevent backup withholding with
respect to payments of cash to certain shareholders, each such
shareholder must provide the exchange agent with such
shareholders correct taxpayer identification number
(TIN) and certify that such shareholder is not
subject to backup withholding by completing the substitute
Form W-9
included in the instructions mailed by the exchange agent to
each security holder, or otherwise establish an exemption.
Certain shareholders (including, among others, all corporations
and certain
non-U.S. individuals
and entities) are not subject to backup withholding. If a
shareholder does not provide its correct TIN or fails to provide
the certifications described above, the Internal Revenue Service
may impose a penalty on the shareholder and payment of cash to
the shareholder pursuant to the Acquisition may be subject to
backup withholding. All shareholders surrendering IPC Shares
pursuant to the Acquisition that are U.S. persons should
complete and sign the substitute
Form W-9
included in the instructions mailed by the exchange agent to
provide the information necessary to avoid backup withholding.
Non-U.S. shareholders
should complete and sign an applicable
Form W-8
(a copy of which may be obtained from the exchange agent) in
order to avoid backup withholding.
Amendment
and Termination of the Scheme of Arrangement
The Scheme of Arrangement contains a provision for Validus to
consent, on behalf of all persons concerned, to any modification
of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any condition to
the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that the Supreme
Court of Bermuda may approve or impose. If there is any
modification of or addition to the Scheme of Arrangement or any
condition to the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that
is material to the interests of IPC shareholders, Validus will
amend this proxy statement and advise the IPC shareholders of
such modification, addition or condition in advance of the
court-ordered IPC meeting, in accordance with applicable law.
Prior to approval by the IPC shareholders at the court-ordered
IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of Arrangement at
any time. Following approval by the IPC shareholders at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, Validus may terminate the Scheme of
Arrangement at any time prior to commencement of the hearing of
the Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of
Arrangement without obtaining the approval of the IPC
shareholders if any event or condition occurs which would cause
any of the conditions to its effectiveness not to be satisfied
by November 30, 2009 (or such later date, if any, as
Validus may agree and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may allow).
If for any reason the Scheme of Arrangement does not become
effective in accordance with its terms, the Scheme of
Arrangement will not be consummated and IPC shareholders will
retain their existing holdings of IPC Shares unless either the
Validus Amalgamation Offer or the Exchange Offer is consummated.
Conditions
to the Scheme of Arrangement
In addition to the requisite approval by IPC shareholders at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, the approval by IPC shareholders at
the IPC special general meeting of resolutions determined by
Validus to be reasonably necessary in connection with
implementation of the Scheme of Arrangement, the sanction of the
Scheme of Arrangement by the Supreme Court of Bermuda and the
delivery of a copy of the court sanction order with the Bermuda
Registrar of
-78-
Companies, the effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement is
subject to the satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the
following other conditions:
Max
Amalgamation Condition
Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not have any
liability with respect to the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, and Max shall not have asserted any
claim of liability or breach against IPC in connection with the
Max Amalgamation Agreement, in each case, other than with
respect to the possible payment of the Max Termination Fee.
Registration
Condition
The issuance of Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the
Scheme of Arrangement shall have been registered under the
Securities Act pursuant to an effective registration statement,
or shall be exempt from the registration requirements thereof.
The issuance of Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the
Scheme of Arrangement will be exempt from such registration
requirements pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities
Act.
Shareholder
Approval Condition
The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the issuance of
the Validus Shares pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement as
required under the rules of the NYSE. All of the Validus
officers, directors and those shareholders which Validus refers
to as its qualified sponsors (as defined in this
proxy statement), in each case who own Validus Shares, have
indicated that they intend to vote the Validus Shares
beneficially owned by them in favor of such approval. As of
April 30, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially
owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus
Shares.
NYSE
Listing Condition
The Validus Shares to be issued pursuant to the Scheme of
Arrangement shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE,
subject to official notice of issuance.
Pending
Litigation Condition
There shall be no threatened or pending litigation, suit, claim,
action, proceeding or investigation before any supranational,
national, state, provincial, municipal or local government,
governmental, regulatory or administrative authority, agency,
instrumentality or commission or any court, tribunal or judicial
or arbitral body (each of which, a governmental
authority): (1) challenging or seeking to, or which,
in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely to, make
illegal, delay or otherwise, directly or indirectly, restrain or
prohibit or in which there are allegations of any violation of
law, rule or regulation relating to, the proposing of, or terms
or provisions of, the Scheme of Arrangement, or the transfer of
all of the outstanding IPC Shares (excluding any IPC Shares
owned by Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries) to
Validus in exchange for Validus Shares; or (2) seeking to,
or which in the judgment of Validus, is reasonably likely to,
prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by
Validus or any of its affiliates, including, without limitation,
the right to vote any IPC Shares acquired by Validus pursuant to
the Scheme of Arrangement or otherwise on all matters properly
presented to IPC shareholders.
No
Material Adverse Change Condition
Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have been any
change, state of facts, circumstance or event that has had, or
would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect
on the financial condition, properties, assets, liabilities,
obligations (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or
otherwise), businesses or results of operations of IPC and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, excluding any such change, state
of facts, circumstance or event to the extent caused by or
resulting from: (i) changes in economic, market, business,
regulatory or political conditions generally in the United
States or in Bermuda or any other jurisdiction in which such
party operates or in Bermudan, United States or global financial
markets; (ii) changes, circumstances or events generally
affecting the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance
industry in the geographic areas in which such party operates;
(iii) changes, circumstances or events resulting in
liabilities under property catastrophe reinsurance, including
any effects resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado,
windstorm, terrorist act, act of war or other natural or
man-made disaster; (iv) changes in any applicable law,
statute, ordinance, common law, arbitration award, or any rule,
regulation, judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree, agency
requirement or published interpretation of any
-79-
governmental authority, including all relevant bye-laws and
regulations of the Council and Society of Lloyds
incorporated under the Lloyds Act of 1871 to 1982 of
England and Wales in each of the jurisdictions in which IPC or
its subsidiaries currently conduct business or operate, which we
refer to as specified laws; (v) changes in
generally accepted accounting principles or in statutory
accounting principles (or local equivalents in the applicable
jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance regulatory
authority, including accounting and financial reporting
pronouncements by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the
BMA), the SEC, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners and the Financial Accounting Standards Board;
(vi) any change or announcement of a potential change in
IPCs or any of its subsidiaries credit or claims
paying rating or A.M. Best rating or the ratings of any of
IPCs or its subsidiaries businesses or securities;
(vii) a change in the trading prices or volume of IPC
Shares; (viii) the failure to meet any revenue, earnings or
other projections, forecasts or predictions for any period
ending after the date of this proxy statement; or (ix) the
commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war or armed
hostilities, except that (A) in the case of the foregoing
clauses (vi), (vii) and (viii), such exceptions shall not
prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any changes,
state of facts, circumstances or events underlying a failure
described in any such clause has resulted in, or contributed to,
a material adverse effect on IPC and its subsidiaries and
(B) in the case of the foregoing clauses (i), (ii), (iv),
(v) and (ix), to the extent those changes, state of facts,
circumstances or events have a materially disproportionate
effect on IPC and its subsidiaries taken as a whole relative to
other similarly situated persons in the property and casualty
insurance and reinsurance industry. In addition, a material
adverse effect shall be deemed to have occurred if IPCs
book value shall have (A) declined by more than 50% from
December 31, 2008 to the commencement of the hearing by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement
or (B) declined from December 31, 2008 to the
commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement by more than 20% greater than
the percentage decline of Validus book value during the
same period, provided that for purposes of measuring the 20%
differential book value decline, if Validus has experienced an
increase in book value from December 31, 2008 to the
commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement, Validus shall be deemed to
have experienced no change in its book value. We refer to any
such materially adverse change, state of facts, circumstance or
event or decline in IPCs book value described above as a
material adverse effect.
Conduct
of Business Condition
Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried on their
respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice at all times on or after the date of this proxy
statement and prior to the commencement of the hearing by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
Validus
Credit Facility Condition
All amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities
necessary to consummate the Scheme of Arrangement and the other
transactions contemplated by this proxy statement shall be in
full force and effect.
Other
Conditions
None of the following events or facts shall have occurred:
(a) there is in effect any order or injunction issued by
any court of competent jurisdiction or any action taken, or any
specified law enacted, entered, enforced or deemed applicable to
the Scheme of Arrangement or the other transactions contemplated
by this proxy statement by any governmental authority of
competent jurisdiction which imposes any term, condition,
obligation or restriction upon Validus, IPC or any of their
respective subsidiaries that would, individually or the
aggregate, reasonably be likely to (A) have a material
adverse effect (assuming all references to IPC in the definition
of material adverse effect were instead references
to Validus) on Validus and its subsidiaries (assuming
consummation of the Acquisition) on a consolidated basis
following the effective time of the Scheme of Arrangement or
(B) directly or indirectly (i) delay or otherwise
restrain, impede or prohibit the Scheme of Arrangement or
(ii) prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC
Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates, including, without
limitation, the right to vote any IPC Shares acquired by Validus
pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement or otherwise on all
matters properly presented to IPC shareholders;
(b) IPC or any of its subsidiaries has (1) permitted
the issuance or sale of any shares of any class of share capital
or other securities of any subsidiary of IPC (other than IPC
Shares issued pursuant to, and in accordance
-80-
with, the terms in effect on the date of this proxy statement of
employee stock options, stock units or other similar awards
outstanding prior to the date of this proxy statement),
(2) declared, paid or proposed to declare or pay any
dividend or other distribution on any share capital of IPC
(other than (A) any quarterly cash dividends paid in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice to
holders of IPC Shares and (B) a one-time dividend to the
holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not to exceed any
reduction in the Max Termination Fee), including by adoption of
a shareholders rights plan (or similar plan) which has not
otherwise been terminated or rendered inapplicable to the Scheme
of Arrangement prior to the commencement of the hearing by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement,
or (3) amended, or authorized or proposed any amendment to,
its articles of incorporation or bye-laws (or other similar
constituent documents) or Validus becomes aware that IPC or any
of its subsidiaries shall have amended, or authorized or
proposed any amendment to, its articles of incorporation or
bye-laws (or other similar constituent documents) in a manner
that, in the reasonable judgment of Validus, is reasonably
likely to, directly or indirectly, (A) delay or otherwise
restrain, impede or prohibit the Scheme of Arrangement or
(B) prohibit or limit the full rights of ownership of IPC
Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates, including, without
limitation, the right to vote any IPC Shares acquired by Validus
pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement or otherwise on all
matters properly presented to IPC shareholders;
(c) Validus or any of its affiliates enters into a
definitive agreement or announces an agreement in principle with
IPC providing for an amalgamation or other business combination
or transaction with or involving IPC or any of its subsidiaries,
or the purchase or exchange of securities or assets of IPC or
any of its subsidiaries, whereby Validus or any of its
subsidiaries acquires securities of IPC, or Validus accepts for
exchange under an exchange offer at least 90% of the IPC Shares
which it sought to acquire under that offer, or Validus and IPC
reach any other agreement or understanding, in either case,
pursuant to which it is agreed or provided that the Scheme of
Arrangement will not be implemented; or
(d) IPC or any of its subsidiaries has (1) granted to
any person proposing an amalgamation or other business
combination with or involving IPC or any of its subsidiaries or
the purchase or exchange of securities or assets of IPC or any
of its subsidiaries any type of option, warrant or right which,
in Validus judgment, constitutes a
lock-up
device (including, without limitation, a right to acquire or
receive any IPC Shares or other securities, assets or business
of IPC or any of its subsidiaries), (2) paid or agreed to
pay any cash or other consideration to any party in connection
with or in any way related to any such business combination,
purchase or exchange (other than the Max Termination Fee) or
(3) amended the Max Amalgamation Agreement in any respect
that alters IPCs rights or obligations upon termination of
the Max Amalgamation Agreement (other than a reduction of the
Max Termination Fee);
which in the reasonable judgment of Validus in any such case,
and regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any such
condition (other than any event or circumstance giving rise to
the triggering of a condition within the direct or indirect
control of Validus), makes it inadvisable to proceed with the
Scheme of Arrangement.
The foregoing conditions are for the sole benefit of Validus and
may be asserted by Validus regardless of the circumstances
giving rise to the right to assert any such condition (other
than any event or circumstance giving rise to the triggering of
a condition within the direct or indirect control of Validus)
or, other than the Procedural Conditions, the
Registration Condition, the Shareholder
Approval Condition, and the NYSE Listing
Condition, which we refer to collectively as the
unwaivable conditions, may be waived by Validus in
whole or in part at any time and from time to time prior to the
commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of Bermuda to
sanction the Scheme of Arrangement in its discretion. Validus
expressly reserves the right to waive any of the conditions to
the Scheme of Arrangement, other than the unwaivable conditions,
and to make any change in the terms of or conditions to the
Scheme of Arrangement. The failure by Validus at any time to
exercise any of the foregoing rights shall not be deemed a
waiver of any such right; the waiver of any such right with
respect to particular facts and other circumstances shall not be
deemed a waiver with respect to any other facts and
circumstances; and each such right shall be deemed an ongoing
right that may be asserted at any time and from time to time
until the commencement of the hearing by the Supreme Court of
Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement or the earlier
lapse, termination or withdrawal of the Scheme of Arrangement.
The Scheme of Arrangement will not proceed unless all the above
conditions are satisfied or, where relevant, waived or, where
appropriate, determined by Validus to have been satisfied or to
remain satisfied prior to the commencement of the hearing by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement.
Validus shall be under no
-81-
obligation to waive or treat as satisfied any of the conditions
set forth following the Procedural Conditions above (such
conditions, the Non-Procedural Conditions) by a date
earlier than November 30, 2009, or such later date, if any,
as Validus may determine and the Supreme Court of Bermuda may
allow, notwithstanding that the Non-Procedural Conditions may at
such earlier date have been waived or satisfied and that there
are at such earlier date no circumstances indicating that any of
such Non-Procedural Conditions may not be capable of being
satisfied. Any determination by Validus concerning any condition
or event described in this proxy statement shall be final and
binding on all parties to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Dividends
and Distributions
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash
dividend, i.e., $0.20 per common share in Validus
case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs case. Validus
expects to continue to pay its regular quarterly dividends
consistent with past practice. It is a condition to the
effectiveness of the Scheme of Arrangement that IPC shall not
have declared, paid or proposed to declare or pay any dividend
or other distribution on any share capital of IPC other than
(i) any quarterly cash dividends paid in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice to holders of
IPC Shares and (ii) a one-time dividend to the holders of
IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not to exceed any reduction in
the Max Termination Fee. All mandates and other instructions in
force at the effective time in relation to the IPC Shares
(including elections for payment of dividends (if any)) will,
immediately after the effective time, be deemed to be valid as
effective mandates or instructions in respect of the Validus
Shares received in consideration of such IPC Shares.
Sources
of Funds, Fees and Expenses
Validus estimates that the aggregate acquisition consideration
paid to IPC shareholders in connection with the Acquisition will
consist of approximately $211.9 million in cash and that
number of Validus Shares determined in accordance with the
exchange ratio. In addition, IPC shareholders will receive cash
in lieu of any fractional Validus Share to which they may be
entitled. Validus expects to have sufficient cash and cash
equivalents on hand to complete the Acquisition, including to
pay the cash component of the Validus Transaction Consideration,
cash in lieu of fractional shares and any cash that may be
required to pay fees, expenses and other related amounts.
It is anticipated that Validus will incur an aggregate of
approximately $20 million in expenses in connection with
the Acquisition, including:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $19.0 million in financial, legal, accounting
and tax advisory fees;
|
|
|
|
approximately $90,000 in SEC filing fees;
|
|
|
|
approximately $350,000 in printing, solicitation and mailing
expenses associated with this proxy statement; and
|
|
|
|
approximately $560,000 in miscellaneous expenses.
|
Validus has engaged Greenhill & Co., LLC
(Greenhill) as financial advisor with respect to its
strategic process and the Acquisition. In connection with
Greenhills services as financial advisor to Validus in
connection with Validus strategic process and the
Acquisition, Validus agreed to pay Greenhill an aggregate fee of
$10.0 million, $2.75 million of which has already been
paid and $7.25 million (less the fee for Greenhills
service as dealer manager in connection with the Exchange Offer
described below) of which is contingent upon the consummation of
a transaction or entry into a definitive agreement that
subsequently results in a transaction. In addition, Validus will
reimburse Greenhill for its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of its
legal counsel. Validus has also agreed to indemnify Greenhill
and its affiliates in connection with Greenhills service
as financial advisor against certain liabilities in connection
with their engagement, including liabilities under the
U.S. federal securities laws.
Validus has also engaged Greenhill to act as dealer manager in
connection with the Exchange Offer. Greenhill may contact
beneficial owners of IPC Shares in its capacity as dealer
manager regarding the Exchange Offer and may request brokers,
dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and other nominees to
forward the Offer to Exchange and related materials to
beneficial owners of IPC Shares. Validus has agreed to pay
Greenhill a reasonable and customary fee for its service as
dealer manager in connection with the Exchange Offer. In
addition, Validus will reimburse Greenhill for its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of its
legal counsel. Validus has also agreed to indemnify Greenhill
and its affiliates in connection with Greenhills
-82-
service as dealer manager against certain liabilities in
connection with their engagement, including liabilities under
the U.S. federal securities laws.
As of June 7, 2009, four merchant banking funds affiliated
with Greenhill owned an aggregate of 2,571,427 Validus Shares,
and certain employees of Greenhill and its affiliates had
interests in one or more of such funds.
Validus has also engaged Dowling & Partners
Securities, LLC (Dowling) as capital markets advisor
with respect to the Acquisition. In connection with
Dowlings services, Validus agreed to pay Dowling an
aggregate fee of $2.0 million. Payment of the fee to
Dowling is not conditioned on a successful Acquisition or
otherwise. In addition, Validus will reimburse Dowling for its
reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of its
legal counsel. Validus has also agreed to indemnify Dowling and
its affiliates in connection with Dowlings services
against certain liabilities in connection with their engagement,
including liabilities under the U.S. federal securities
laws.
Validus has retained Georgeson Inc. (Georgeson) as
information agent in connection with the Exchange Offer. The
information agent may contact holders of IPC Shares by mail,
telephone, telex, telegraph and personal interview and may
request brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and
other nominees to forward material relating to the Exchange
Offer to beneficial owners of IPC Shares. Validus will pay the
information agent reasonable and customary compensation for
these services in addition to reimbursing the information agent
for its reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. Validus agreed to indemnify the information agent
against certain liabilities and expenses in connection with the
Exchange Offer, including certain liabilities under the
U.S. federal securities laws.
Validus has also retained Georgeson for solicitation and
advisory services in connection with solicitations relating to
the Acquisition, for which Georgeson will receive a customary
fee. Validus has also agreed to reimburse Georgeson for
out-of-pocket expenses and to indemnify Georgeson against
certain liabilities and expenses, including reasonable legal
fees and related charges.
In addition, Validus has retained BNY Mellon Shareowner Services
as the exchange agent in connection with the Exchange Offer.
Validus will pay the exchange agent reasonable and customary
compensation for its services in connection with the Exchange
Offer, will reimburse the exchange agent for its reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses and will indemnify the exchange agent
against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain
liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws.
Dissenters
and Appraisal Rights of IPC Shareholders
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, it will be
binding on all IPC shareholders whether or not they voted in
favor of the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered IPC
meeting or of the resolutions proposed at the IPC special
general meeting and IPC shareholders will not be entitled to
exercise any appraisal rights. IPC shareholders will be entitled
to be present and be heard at the Supreme Court of Bermuda
hearing to sanction the Scheme of Arrangement. Any IPC
shareholder who wishes to may oppose the sanctioning of the
Scheme of Arrangement and may make presentations to the court on
the hearing of the petition. IPC shareholders will be notified
of the date of the Supreme Court of Bermuda hearing to sanction
the Scheme of Arrangement once it is set. IPC shareholders may
also vote against the Scheme of Arrangement at the court-ordered
IPC meeting.
-83-
THE
COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING
This proxy statement is being provided to the IPC shareholders
in connection with the solicitation of proxies by Validus to be
voted at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
Date,
Time and Place
The court-ordered IPC meeting will be held at
[ ], Atlantic Time, on [ ],
2009, at [ ].
Purposes
of the Court-Ordered IPC Meeting
At the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC shareholders will be asked
to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Scheme of
Arrangement.
VALIDUS IS DISTRIBUTING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN ORDER TO URGE
IPCS SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE FOR THE SCHEME OF
ARRANGEMENT AT THE
COURT-ORDERED
IPC MEETING.
Record
date and Shares Entitled to Vote
IPC shareholders of record, as shown on the transfer books of
IPC at the close of business on [ ], 2009 will
be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the
court-ordered IPC meeting. As of [ ], 2009,
there were [ ] outstanding IPC Shares entitled
to receive notice of and to vote at the court-ordered IPC
meeting. Each IPC Share entitles the holder of record thereof to
one vote at the court-ordered IPC meeting. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the holders of any IPC Shares owned by Validus, IPC
or their respective subsidiaries will not be entitled to vote
those shares at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
How to
Vote Your IPC Shares
The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your
IPC Shares are held.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are a shareholder of record, meaning that your IPC Shares
are represented by certificates or book entries in your name so
that you appear as a shareholder in the transfer books
maintained by the IPC Share transfer agent, Computershare
Investor Services, the proxy card for voting those IPC Shares
included with this proxy statement may be used. You may direct
how your IPC Shares are to be voted by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the
enclosed envelope; or
|
|
|
|
voting in person at the court-ordered IPC meeting by bringing
the enclosed proxy card or using the ballot provided at the
meeting. You should be prepared to present photo identification
for admission upon request or you will not be admitted to the
court-ordered IPC meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you own IPC Shares through a bank, broker or other nominee
(in street name), you should, instead of a proxy
card, receive from your bank, broker or other nominee a voting
instructions form. You can use such voting instructions form to
instruct how your IPC Shares are to be voted. As with a proxy
card, you may direct how your IPC Shares are to be voted by
completing, signing, dating and returning the voting
instructions form in accordance with the instructions received
from your bank, broker or other nominee. In addition, many banks
and brokerage firms have arranged for Internet or telephonic
instructions regarding how shares are to be voted and provide
instructions for using those services on the voting instruction
form. Please consult with your bank, broker or other nominee if
you have any questions regarding the electronic voting of IPC
Shares held in street name. Validus has requested that brokerage
and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries forward
solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of IPC Shares
and will reimburse those persons for their reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding the materials. Only shareholders of
record may vote their shares in person at the court-ordered IPC
meeting. Therefore, if you own your shares in street name, you
will be entitled to attend the court-ordered IPC meeting and
vote your IPC Shares only if you have previously either arranged
for the IPC Shares of record to be transferred into your name by
the record date for the court-ordered IPC meeting or secured a
valid proxy or power of attorney from the bank, broker or other
nominee that holds your shares as of the record date for the
court-ordered IPC
|
-84-
|
|
|
|
|
meeting (and who has received a valid proxy or power of attorney
from the shareholder of record pursuant to a legal
proxy with power of subdelegation from the shareholder of
record as of the record date).
|
Quorum;
Required Vote; Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
The presence at the court-ordered IPC meeting of two or more
persons present in person and representing in person or by proxy
in excess of 50% of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares
throughout the meeting is required to constitute a quorum
thereat. The Scheme of Arrangement requires the affirmative vote
of a majority in number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at
the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy,
representing 75% or more in value of the IPC Shares voting at
the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy. In
accordance with NYSE rules, banks, brokers and other nominees
who hold IPC Shares in street-name for customers may not
exercise their voting discretion with respect to the Scheme of
Arrangement. Accordingly, if you do not provide your bank,
broker or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your
street name shares, your bank, broker or other nominee will not
be permitted to vote them at the court-ordered IPC meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered
votes cast on any proposal brought before the court-ordered IPC
meeting. A broker non-vote with respect to any proposal to be
voted on at the court-ordered IPC meeting will not have the
effect of a vote for or against the Scheme of Arrangement, but
will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase the
relative influence of those shareholders voting. See also The
Court-Ordered IPC Meeting Record Date and
Shares Entitled to Vote.
Voting
Procedures
Voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting will be by poll. Each
IPC shareholder of record and each person holding a valid proxy
or power of attorney for the court-ordered IPC meeting from the
bank, broker or other nominee that holds its shares (and who has
received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the shareholder
of record pursuant to a legal proxy with power of
subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the record
date) will be entitled to one vote for each IPC Share owned or
represented (other than in respect of any IPC Shares owned by
Validus, IPC or their respective subsidiaries).
Adjournments
If the court-ordered IPC meeting is adjourned, holders of IPC
Shares whose names appear on the register of members of IPC on
the record date (other than Validus, IPC and their respective
subsidiaries) will be entitled to attend and vote at the
adjourned court-ordered IPC meeting in respect of the number of
IPC Shares registered in their name on the record date.
How to
Revoke a Proxy
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before
your proxy is voted at the court-ordered IPC meeting. If you are
a shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your
proxy by: (1) delivering to IPC (Attention: Secretary) at
American International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM
08, Bermuda a written notice of revocation of your proxy;
(2) delivering to IPC an authorized proxy bearing a later
date; or (3) attending the court-ordered IPC meeting and
voting in person as described above under How to Vote Your
IPC Shares. Attendance at the court-ordered IPC meeting in
and of itself, without voting in person at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, will not cause your previously granted proxy to be
revoked. For shares you hold in street name, you should follow
the instructions of your bank, broker or other nominee or, if
you have obtained a valid proxy or power of attorney from the
bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who
has received a valid proxy or power of attorney from the
shareholder of record pursuant to a legal proxy with
power of subdelegation from the shareholder of record as of the
record date) giving you the right to vote your shares at the
court-ordered IPC meeting, by attending the court-ordered IPC
meeting and voting in person.
IPCs
Auditors
Representatives of KPMG, IPCs independent registered
public accounting firm, are not expected to be present at the
court-ordered IPC meeting and accordingly will not make any
statement or be available to respond to any questions.
-85-
Proxy
Solicitation
Validus will pay the cost of this proxy solicitation. In
addition to soliciting proxies by mail, directors, officers and
employees of Validus may solicit proxies personally and by
telephone, facsimile or otherwise. None of these persons will
receive additional or special compensation for soliciting
proxies. In addition, Validus has retained Georgeson to assist
in its solicitation of proxies in connection with the
court-ordered IPC meeting, and estimates that it will pay
Georgeson a fee not to exceed $100,000. Georgeson may solicit
proxies from individuals, banks, brokers, custodians, nominees,
other institutional holders and other fiduciaries. Validus has
also agreed to reimburse Georgeson for its reasonable
administrative and
out-of-pocket
expenses and to indemnify it against certain losses, costs and
expenses. Also, upon request, Validus will reimburse brokers,
banks and other nominees for their expenses in sending proxy
materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and
obtaining their voting instructions.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your IPC Shares, please contact:
199 Water Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call:
(212) 440-9800
or
Toll Free: at
(888) 274-5119
Email: validusIPC@georgeson.com
-86-
PROPOSAL TO
BE SUBMITTED TO IPC SHAREHOLDER VOTE AT THE COURT-ORDERED IPC
MEETING; VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION
PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT
This is a proposal to approve the Scheme of Arrangement, as
described in detail under The Acquisition, The Scheme
of Arrangement and The Court-Ordered IPC Meeting.
Validus believes that the combination of Validus and IPC offers
a number of benefits to holders of IPC Shares, including those
described under The Acquisition Reasons to Vote
FOR the Scheme of Arrangement and the following:
Validus believes that the Acquisition by Validus represents a
compelling combination and excellent strategic fit that will
enable the combined company to capitalize on opportunities in
the global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the
Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the
superior growth potential of a combined company that would be a
leading carrier in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and
insurance markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality
diversification in profitable business lines. The Validus Shares
to be issued and cash to be paid to IPC shareholders in exchange
for IPC Shares in the Scheme of Arrangement will provide IPC
shareholders with a premium for their shares and will allow IPC
shareholders to participate in the growth and opportunities of
the combined company while receiving cash for a portion of their
investment in IPC Shares. The premium represented by the Scheme
of Arrangement may be larger or smaller depending on the market
price of the IPC Shares and the Validus Shares at the effective
time and will fluctuate between now and then depending on the
market prices. For further information, see The
Acquisition Reasons to Vote FOR the
Scheme of Arrangement.
Validus believes that the combination of Validus and IPC offers
a number of benefits to holders of IPC Shares, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Scheme of Arrangement provides a premium to IPC shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Validus Shares to be issued to IPC shareholders as a portion
of the Validus Transaction Consideration pursuant to the Scheme
of Arrangement represent what we believe is an attractive
investment;
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Validus/IPC combination will have a strong balance sheet with
minimal exposure to risky asset classes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus offers IPC a highly experienced, first class management
team; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Scheme of Arrangement provides IPC shareholders with an
opportunity for stable, profitable diversification into
attractive business lines and further growth.
|
As such, we are proposing:
|
|
|
|
|
That the Scheme of Arrangement be and it is hereby approved by
IPC and IPC be bound thereby, and any person nominated by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda or any director of IPC or of Validus
shall be authorized to take all such actions as Validus may
consider necessary or appropriate for carrying the Scheme of
Arrangement into effect.
|
The Scheme of Arrangement must be approved by a majority in
number of the holders of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered
IPC meeting, whether in person or by proxy, representing 75% or
more in value of the IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC
meeting, whether in person or by proxy.
VALIDUS IS DISTRIBUTING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN ORDER TO URGE
IPCS SHAREHOLDERS TO VOTE FOR THE SCHEME OF
ARRANGEMENT AT THE COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING.
ONLY THE LATEST-DATED PROXY COUNTS. VOTE FOR THE
SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT, BY COMPLETING, SIGNING, DATING AND
RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD IN THE POSTAGE-PAID
ENVELOPE PROVIDED OR FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED BY
YOUR BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE. NO POSTAGE IS NECESSARY IF
YOUR PROXY CARD IS MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES. THEREFORE,
VALIDUS URGES YOU TO COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD.
-87-
REGULATORY
MATTERS
Validus is not aware of any governmental license or regulatory
permit that appears to be material to IPCs business that
might be adversely affected by the Acquisition or, except as
described below, of any approval or other action by any
government or governmental administrative or regulatory
authority or agency, domestic or foreign, that would be required
for the Acquisition or ownership of IPC Shares pursuant to the
Scheme of Arrangement. Should any of these approvals or other
actions be required, Validus currently contemplates that these
approvals or other actions will be sought. There can be no
assurance that any such approvals or other actions, if required,
will be obtained (with or without substantial conditions) or
that if these approvals were not obtained or these other actions
were not taken adverse consequences might not result to
IPCs business or certain parts of IPCs or
Validus, or any of their respective subsidiaries,
businesses might not have to be disposed of or held separate.
Insurance
Regulations
Applications or notifications in connection with the Scheme of
Arrangement and the changes in control of various subsidiaries
of IPC that may be deemed to occur as a result of the Scheme of
Arrangement may be required to be filed, with various
non-U.S. regulatory
authorities.
In addition, under the Bermuda Insurance Act of 1978,
(i) Validus is required to file a notification regarding
the acquisition of IPC Shares with the BMA within 45 days
after the date that Validus becomes a 10 percent,
20 percent, 33 percent or 50 percent shareholder
of IPC and (ii) any person who, directly or indirectly,
becomes a holder of at least 10 percent, 20 percent,
33 percent or 50 percent of the Validus Shares must
notify the BMA in writing within 45 days of such
acquisition.
Although Validus does not expect these regulatory authorities to
raise any significant concerns in connection with their review
of the Scheme of Arrangement, there is no assurance that Validus
will obtain all required regulatory approvals or that these
approvals will not include terms, conditions or restrictions
that are adverse to Validus or to IPC.
The consummation of the Scheme of Arrangement will not require
the approval of any U.S. insurance regulators because
neither Validus nor IPC operates a
U.S.-regulated
insurance business that would require any such approval.
Other than the approvals and notifications described above,
Validus is not aware of any material regulatory approvals
required to be obtained, or waiting periods required to expire
after the making of a filing. If Validus discovers that other
approvals or filings
and/or
waiting periods are necessary, it will seek to obtain or comply
with them, although there can be no assurance that they will be
obtained, as is the case with the regulatory approvals described
above.
-88-
INFORMATION
ABOUT VALIDUS AND IPC
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company, with its principal
executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is
(441) 278-9000.
Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting
its operations worldwide through two wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Validus Re and Talbot. Validus Re is a Bermuda-based reinsurer
focused on short-tail lines of reinsurance. Talbot is the
Bermuda parent of the specialty insurance group primarily
operating within the Lloyds insurance market through
Syndicate 1183. At March 31, 2009, Validus had total
shareholders equity of $2.023 billion and total
assets of $4.763 billion. Validus Shares are traded on the
NYSE under the symbol VR and, as of June 22,
2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this
proxy statement, Validus had a market capitalization of
approximately $1.59 billion. Validus has approximately
280 employees.
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to IPC
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100 IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and
Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
Validus files periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. The public may read and copy any
materials filed with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The
public may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and
information statements, and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the SEC. The SECs website
address is
http://www.sec.gov.
Validus Shares are traded on the NYSE with the symbol
VR. Similar information concerning Validus can be
reviewed at the office of the NYSE at 20 Broad Street, New
York, New York, 10005. Validus website address is
http://www.validusre.bm.
Information contained in this website is not part of this report.
Validus annual report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available
free of charge, including through its website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such material is electronically
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Copies of the charters for
the audit committee, the compensation committee, the corporate
governance and nominating committee, the finance committee and
the underwriting committee, as well as Validus Corporate
Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for
Directors, Officers and Employees, which applies to all of
Validus Directors, officers and employees, and Code of
Ethics for Senior Officers, which applies to Validus
principal executive officer, principal accounting officer and
other persons holding a comparable position, are available free
of charge on Validus website at www.validusre.bm or by
writing to Investor Relations, Validus Holdings, Ltd.,
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda. Validus will
also post on its website any amendment to the Code and any
waiver of the Code granted to any of its directors or executive
officers to the extent required by applicable rules.
IPC
Holdings, Ltd.
The following description of IPC is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
IPC provides property catastrophe reinsurance and, to a limited
extent,
property-per-risk
excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93%
of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property
catastrophe reinsurance covers against unpredictable events such
as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods
and other man-made or natural disasters. The substantial
majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe has been, and
continues to be, written on an excess of loss basis for primary
insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject to aggregate
limits on exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had approximately
258 clients from whom it received either annual/deposit or
adjustment premiums, including many of the leading insurance
companies around the world. In 2008, approximately 36% of those
clients were based in the United States, and approximately 53%
of gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
related primarily to U.S. risks. IPCs
non-U.S. clients
and its
non-U.S. covered
risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and
New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for
more than 3.7% of its gross premiums written, excluding
reinstatement premiums. IPC did not disclose gross
-89-
premiums written by class of business in the
IPC 10-Q.
Therefore, comparable disclosure of property catastrophe
premiums cannot be presented. At March 31, 2009, IPC had
total shareholders equity of $1.849 billion and total
assets of $2.453 billion.
In response to a severe imbalance between the global supply of
and demand for property catastrophe reinsurance that developed
during the period from 1989 through 1993, IPC and IPCRe were
formed as Bermuda companies and commenced operations in June
1993 through the sponsorship of American International Group,
Inc. (AIG). On August 15, 2006, AIG sold its
entire shareholding in an underwritten public offering. As from
August 15, 2006, to IPCs knowledge, AIG no longer has
any direct ownership interest in IPC.
IPC Shares are quoted on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol
IPCR and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol
IPCR BH. IPCRe Europe Limited, a subsidiary of IPCRe
incorporated in Ireland, underwrites select reinsurance
business. Currently, IPCRe Europe Limited retrocedes 90% of the
business it underwrites to IPCRe.
Internet Address: IPCs Internet address is www.ipcre.bm
and the investor relations section of its website is located at
www.ipcre.bm/financials/quarterly-index.html. IPC makes
available free of charge, through the investor relations section
of its website, annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 as soon
as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed
with, or furnished to, the SEC.
-90-
COMPARISON
OF SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
The following is a summary of the material differences
between the current rights of Validus shareholder and the
current rights of IPC shareholders. The rights of the IPC
shareholders who become Validus shareholders pursuant to the
Acquisition will be governed by the memorandum of association
and the amended and restated bye-laws of Validus, which will
remain subject to amendment in accordance with their terms. This
summary is not intended to be complete and is qualified by
reference to Validus memorandum of association and its
amended and restated bye-laws, and IPCs memorandum of
association and its amended and restated bye-laws, as well as
the laws of Bermuda. Validus memorandum of association and
amended and restated bye-laws are incorporated by reference (as
Exhibit 3.1 to Validus Registration Statement on
Form S-1
filed on January 16, 2007 and Exhibit 3.2 to
Validus Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Amendment No. 4) filed on July 5, 2007,
respectively). IPCs memorandum of association and amended
and restated bye-laws are incorporated by reference (as
Exhibit 3.1 to IPCs Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Amendment No. 1) filed on February 9, 1996 and
Exhibit 3.2 to IPCs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on July 30, 2007, respectively).
The following information relating to IPC is taken from the
IPC/Max S-4.
See Sources of Additional Information above. Shareholders
of Validus and IPC may request copies of these documents as
provided in Where You Can Find More Information on
page [ ].
Share
Capital
As of June 19, 2009, Validus had an authorized share
capital of 571,428,571 authorized common shares having a par
value of $0.175 each. As of March 31, 2009, Validus
issued and outstanding share capital consisted of 75,828,922
common shares, par value $0.175 per share. Validus common
shares trade on the NYSE.
As of May 8, 2009, IPC had an authorized share capital of
$1,850,000 divided into 150,000,000 authorized common shares
having a par value of $0.01 each and 35,000,000 preferred shares
having a par value of $0.01 each. As of March 31, 2009,
IPCs outstanding share capital consisted of 56,092,672
common shares, par value $0.01 per share. IPCs common
shares trade on NASDAQ.
Assuming the Acquisition was completed on March 31, 2009,
as of such date Validus would have (i) an authorized share
capital of 571,428,571 authorized common shares having a par
value of $0.175 each and (ii) issued and outstanding share
capital of 138,681,828 common shares, par value $0.175 per
share. Validus common shares will trade on the NYSE.
Shareholder
Equity
Under Bermuda law, the excess of any consideration paid on issue
of shares over the aggregate par value of such shares must
(except in certain limited circumstances) be credited to a share
premium account. Share premium may be distributed in certain
limited circumstances, for example to pay up unissued shares
which may be distributed to shareholders in proportion to their
holdings, but is otherwise subject to limitation, and cannot be
paid to shareholders as a dividend.
A Bermuda company may also create a contributed surplus account
and may credit to such account any cash and other property paid
or transferred to the company as sole beneficial owner (other
than in connection with the issuance of shares). Unlike share
premium arising upon the issuance of shares, the amount standing
to the credit of a companys contributed surplus account
may be distributed to shareholders subject to the solvency of
the company. See: Dividends and Distributions of Contributed
Surplus below.
As of March 31, 2009, Validus had paid in nominal share
capital of $13.3 million, and a share premium account of
$1,419.6 million. As of March 31, 2009, IPC had paid
in nominal share capital of $0.6 million, and a share
premium account of $1,091.5 million.
-91-
Organizational
Documents
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The rights of Validus shareholders are currently governed by its
memorandum of association and bye-laws and by Bermuda law.
There is also a shareholder agreement dated December 7, 2005.
These rights are described herein under Comparison of
Shareholder Rights.
|
|
The rights of IPC shareholders are currently governed by its
memorandum of association and bye-laws and by Bermuda law. These
rights are described herein under Comparison of Shareholder
Rights.
|
Limitation
on Voting Rights
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
If the number of Controlled Shares of any shareholder or group
of related shareholders would constitute more than 9.09% of the
aggregate voting power of all common shares entitled to vote on
a matter, the votes conferred by such Controlled Shares will be
reduced, such that the vote conferred by such shares represent
9.09% of the aggregate voting power of all common shares
entitled to vote on such matter.
|
|
If the number of Controlled Shares of any holder or group or
related shareholders would constitute 10% or more of the
combined voting power of the issued and outstanding common
shares, the voting power of this shareholder or group of related
shareholders will be reduced so that the voting power is not
more than approximately 9.9% of the total voting rights attached
to the issued and outstanding common shares.
|
|
|
|
A Controlled Share of any person refers to all (i)
voting and non-voting common shares, (ii) securities convertible
into or exchangeable into voting or non-voting common shares,
and (iii) options, warrants or other rights to acquire voting or
non-voting common shares that a person is deemed to own
directly, indirectly or constructively within the meaning of (x)
Section 958 of the Code or (y) Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange
Act.
|
|
A Controlled Share of any person refers to all
common shares, owned by such person whether (i) directly; (ii)
for a U.S. person, by application of the rules of Section 958(a)
and 958(b) of the Code; or (iii) beneficially, directly or
indirectly, within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the
Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
|
-92-
Ownership
Limitation
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus is authorized to request information from any holder of
shares and has the right to repurchase shares (other than shares
that have been sold pursuant to an effective registration
statement under the Securities Act) if the board of directors
determines that such repurchase is required in order to avoid or
ameliorate adverse legal, tax or regulatory consequences or if
such holder has undergone a Change of Control. Similar
restrictions apply to Validus ability to redeem shares.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, IPCs directors are required to
decline to register a transfer of shares if they have reason to
believe that the result of such transfer would be to increase
the total number of Controlled Shares of any person to 10% or
more of the shares of IPC without giving effect to the
limitation on voting rights described above. Similar
restrictions apply to IPCs ability to issue, redeem or
repurchase shares.
|
|
|
|
Change of Control in the Validus bye-laws means the
occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) a
majority of the board of directors (or equivalent governing
body) of a shareholder shall consist of persons who were not (a)
a member of the board of directors (or equivalent governing
body) of such shareholder on the December 7, 2005 or (b)
nominated for election or elected to the board of directors (or
equivalent governing body) of such shareholder, with the
affirmative vote of a majority of persons who were members of
such board of directors (or equivalent governing body) at the
time of such nomination or election or (ii) the acquisition by
any person or group of the power, directly or indirectly, to
vote or direct the voting of securities having more than 50% of
the ordinary voting power for the election of the directors of a
shareholder (other than certain permitted transferees, persons,
groups or their Affiliates who had such power when such
shareholder first became a shareholder or acquisitions approved
in advance by a majority of the members of the board of
directors (or equivalent governing body) of such shareholder or
upon the death or disability of a natural person).
|
|
IPC directors also may, in their absolute discretion, each decline to register the transfer of any shares if they have reason to believe (1) that the transfer may expose the company, any of its subsidiaries, any shareholder or any person ceding insurance to IPC or any of its subsidiaries to adverse tax or regulatory treatment in any jurisdiction or (2) that registration of the transfer under the Securities Act or under any U.S. state securities laws or under the laws of any other jurisdiction is required and such registration has not been duly effected. In addition, IPCs directors will decline to approve or register a transfer of shares unless all applicable consents, authorizations, permissions or approvals of any governmental body or agency in Bermuda, the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction required to be obtained prior to such transfer will have been obtained.
The IPC bye-laws also provide that its board of directors may suspend the registration of transfers for any reason and for such periods as it may determine, provided that it may not suspend the registration of transfers for more than 45 days in any period of 365 consecutive days.
IPC is authorized to request information from any holder or prospective acquirer of shares as necessary to give effect to the transfer, issuance and repurchase restrictions described above, and may decline to effect any transaction if complete and accurate information is not received as requested.
Pursuant to the IPC bye-laws, if the directors of IPC refuse to register a transfer for any reason, they must notify the proposed transferor and transferee within 30 days of such refusal. Bermuda law, unless the IPC bye-laws otherwise provide, requires a 90 day notice period of such refusal to register a transfer.
|
-93-
Dividends
and Distributions of Contributed Surplus
Under Bermuda law, shareholders are entitled to receive
dividends, when and as declared by a companys board of
directors, out of any funds of the company legally available for
the payment of such dividends, subject to any preferred dividend
right of any holders of any preference shareholders from time to
time.
Bermuda law does not permit payment of dividends or
distributions of contributed surplus by a company if there are
reasonable grounds for believing:
(i) the company is, or would, after the payment is made be,
unable to pay its liabilities as they become due; or
(ii) that the realizable value of the companys assets
would be less, as a result of the payment, than the aggregated
of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share
premium.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, the board of Validus has the power
to declare dividends and to determine whether such dividends are
to be paid in cash or wholly or partly in specie and to fix the
value for distribution in specie of any assets. No unpaid
dividend shall bear interest against Validus.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board of IPC has the power to
declare dividends, and to determine whether such dividends are
to be paid in cash or wholly or partly in specie and to fix the
value of any assets forming the subject of a dividend in
specie. No unpaid dividend shall bear interest against IPC.
|
Right
to Call Special General Meeting
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws provide that special general meetings of
the shareholders may be called only by Validus (i)
chairman of the board, (ii) any two directors who are directors
at the time the bye-laws first become effective on July 24,
2007, or (iii) a majority of the board.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws provide that a special general meeting of the
shareholders may be called by IPCs (i) chairman of the
board, (ii) any two directors, (iii) any director and the
secretary of the company, or (iv) the board.
|
|
|
|
Bermuda law also requires the board to call a special general
meeting upon the requisition of shareholders holding not less
than one-tenth of the paid-up share capital of Validus as at the
date of the deposit.
|
|
Bermuda law and IPC bye-laws also require the board to call a
special general meeting upon the requisition of the shareholders
holding not less than one-tenth of the paid up share capital of
IPC as at the date of the deposit.
|
Notice
of Shareholder Proposals and Nomination of Candidates by
Shareholders
Under Bermuda law, shareholders may, at their own expense
(unless the company otherwise resolves), as set forth below,
require a company to give notice of any resolution that
shareholders can properly propose at the next annual general
meeting
and/or to
circulate a statement (of not more than 1000 words) in respect
of any matter referred to in a proposed resolution or any
business to be conducted at that general meeting. The number of
shareholders necessary for such a request is either the number
of shareholders, representing not less than one-twentieth of the
total voting rights of all the shareholders having at the date
of the request a right to vote at the meeting to which the
request relates, or not less than 100 shareholders. Each
such written request is referred to in this section as a
Shareholder Notice.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws are silent on matters relating to notice of
shareholder proposals and nominations of candidates.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws are silent on matters relating to notice of
shareholder proposals and nominations of candidates.
|
-94-
Shareholder
Action by Written Consent
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, a resolution may only be passed by
written consent to be signed by all of the shareholders who at
the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend a
shareholder meeting and vote on the resolution.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, a resolution may only be passed by
written consent to be signed by all of the shareholders who at
the date of the resolution would be entitled to attend a
shareholder meeting and vote on the resolution.
|
Classification
of Board of Directors
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws divide the directors into three classes
of directors, each class to have as nearly the same number of
directors as possible. The initial terms of the class 1, class
2 and class 3 directors expire in one year, two years and
three years, respectively, following the adoption of the
bye-laws on July 24, 2007. Following their initial terms, all
three classes shall be elected to three-year terms.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board is not classified and the term
is for one year.
|
Alternate
Directors
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws do not provide for alternate directors.
|
|
According to the IPC bye-laws, each director may appoint an
alternate director by providing written notice to the secretary
of the company. An alternate director shall be entitled to
receive notice of all meetings of the board and to attend and
vote at any such meeting at which the appointing director is not
personally present and generally to perform at such meeting all
the functions of such director.
|
Number
of Directors
Under Bermuda law, the minimum number of directors on a board of
a company is two, although the minimum number of directors may
be set higher and the maximum number of directors may also be
determined in accordance with the bye-laws of the company. The
maximum number of directors may be determined by the Members at
a general meeting or in such other manner as provided in the
bye-laws.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus bye-laws provide that the board shall consist of
not less than nine and not more than 12 directors. The
exact number of directors is determined by a resolution adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a two-thirds majority of the
board then in office. If no such resolution is in effect, the
board will consist of 11 directors. Any increase in the
size of the board pursuant to this provision may be filled by
the directors appointing additional directors.
|
|
IPCs bye-laws provide that the board shall consist of not
less than two nor more than nine, the exact number to be
determined by the board. However, in the event any class or
series of preferred shares is issued and outstanding, the board
may from time to time increase the maximum number of directors
to any number larger than nine, if the board determines, in its
discretion, that such increase is necessary to comply with the
terms of any such class or series of issued and outstanding
preferred shares. The board shall have the power to appoint any
person as a director or fill in vacancies.
|
-95-
Removal
of Directors
Under Bermuda law, subject to a companys bye-laws, the
shareholders of a company may, at a special general meeting
called for that purpose, remove any director or the entire board
of directors provided that the notice of the meeting is served
on the director or directors concerned not less than
14 days before such meeting. Any director given notice of
removal will be entitled to be heard at the special general
meeting. A vacancy created by the removal of a director at a
special general meeting may be filled at that meeting by the
election of another director in his or her place or in the
absence of any such election by the other directors.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, the shareholders may, at any annual
meeting or special general meeting called for that purpose,
remove a director only for Cause by the affirmative vote of at
least sixty-six and two-thirds percent of the votes cast,
provided that the notice of the meeting is served on the
director or directors concerned not less than 14 days
before such meeting and at such meeting such director shall be
entitled to be heard on the motion for such directors
removal.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws do not deviate from the general Bermuda law
position as set out above.
|
|
|
|
Cause in the Validus bye-laws means willful
misconduct, fraud, gross negligence, embezzlement or a
conviction of, or a plea of guilty or no
contest to, a felony or other crime involving moral
turpitude.
|
|
|
-96-
Vacancies
on the Board of Directors
Under Bermuda law, so long as a quorum of directors remains in
office, unless the bye-laws of a company otherwise provide, any
vacancy occurring in the board of directors may be filled by
such directors as remain in office. If no quorum of directors
remains, the vacancy will be filled by a general meeting of
shareholders.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Under the Validus bye-laws, the office of director shall be vacated if the director (1) is removed from office pursuant to the bye-laws or is prohibited from being a director by law, (2) is or becomes bankrupt, or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally, (3) is or becomes of unsound mind or an order for his detention is made, or dies, or (4) resigns his office. The board of directors has the power to appoint any person to be a director to fill a vacancy and a director so appointed shall hold office until such directors office is otherwise vacated and shall serve within the same class of directors as the predecessor.
Under the Validus bye-laws, the board of directors may act notwithstanding any vacancy in its number but, if and so long as its number is reduced below the number fixed by the bye-laws as the quorum necessary for the transaction of business at meetings of the board of directors, the continuing directors or director may act for the purpose of (1) summoning a general meeting or (2) preserving the assets of the company.
|
|
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board of directors has the power at any time to appoint any person as a director to fill a vacancy on the board of directors occurring as the result of the death, disability, disqualification or resignation of any director or if such directors office is otherwise vacated. The office of director shall be vacated if the director (1) is removed from office pursuant to the bye-laws or is prohibited from being a director by law, (2) is or becomes bankrupt, or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally, (3) is or becomes of unsound mind or an order for his detention is made, or dies, or (4) resigns his office. A director so appointed by the board of directors will hold office until the next annual general meeting or until such directors office is otherwise vacated.
Under the IPC bye-laws, the board of directors may act notwithstanding any vacancy in its number but, if and so long as its number is reduced below the number fixed by the bye-laws, or such greater number as may have been determined by the shareholders, as the quorum necessary for the transaction of business at meetings of the board of directors, the continuing directors or director may act only for the purpose of (1) summoning a general meeting or (2) preserving the assets of the company.
|
Interested
Directors
Bermuda law provides that, if a director or officer has an
interest in a material contract or proposed material contract
with the company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material
interest in any person that is a party to such a contract, the
director or officer must disclose the nature of that interest at
the first opportunity either at a meeting of directors or in
writing to the board of directors.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws provide that, a director who is directly or
indirectly interested in a contract or proposed contract or
arrangement with the company or any of its subsidiaries shall
declare the nature of such interest to the board, whether or not
such declaration is required by law. Unless disqualified by the
chairman of the relevant board meeting, a director may vote in
respect of any contract or proposed contract or arrangement in
which such director is interested and may be counted in the
quorum for such meeting.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws provide that, a director who is directly or
indirectly interested in a contract or a proposed contract or
arrangement with the company shall declare the nature of such
interest as required by the Companies Act. Unless disqualified
by the chairman of the relevant board meeting, a director may
vote in respect of any contract or proposed contract or
arrangement in which such director is interested and may be
counted in the quorum for such meeting.
|
-97-
Election
of Directors
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
According to the Validus bye-laws, at any election of directors,
nominees shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast.
|
|
According to the IPC bye-laws, cumulative voting applies to any
election of directors. Each shareholder entitled to vote in
such election shall have a number of votes equal to the product
of (x) the number of votes conferred by such shareholders
common shares (as adjusted pursuant to the voting power
reduction provisions in the bye-laws, if applicable) and (y) the
number of persons standing for election as directors at the
general meeting. Each shareholder may divide and distribute
his votes, as so calculated, among any one or more candidates
for the directorships to be filled, or such shareholder may cast
his votes for a single candidate. At such election, the
candidates receiving the highest number of votes, up to the
number of directors to be chosen, shall stand elected, and an
absolute majority of the votes cast is not a prerequisite to the
election of any candidate to the board.
|
Voting
Rights and Quorum Requirements
Under Bermuda law, the voting rights of shareholders are
regulated by the companys bye-laws and, in certain
circumstances, by the Companies Act. At any general meeting of
IPC, two or more persons present in person and representing in
person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued and
outstanding common shares throughout the meeting will form a
quorum for the transaction of business. Generally, except as
otherwise provided in a Bermuda companys bye-laws, or the
Companies Act, any action or resolution requiring approval of
the shareholders may be passed by a simple majority of votes
cast.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Any individual who is a Validus shareholder and who is present
at a meeting may vote in person as may any corporate shareholder
that is represented by a duly authorized representative at a
meeting of shareholders.
|
|
Any individual who is an IPC shareholder and who is present at a
meeting may vote in person, as may any corporate shareholder
that is represented by a duly authorized representative at a
meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
|
The Validus bye-laws also permit attendance at general meetings
by proxy.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws also permit attendance at general meetings by
proxy.
|
|
|
|
Subject to the Limitations on Voting Rights described
above, each holder of voting common shares is entitled to one
vote per voting common share held.
|
|
Subject to the Limitations on Voting Rights described
above, each holder of common shares is entitled to one vote per
common share held.
|
Discontinuance
or Change of Jurisdiction of Incorporation
Under Bermuda law, a company may change its jurisdiction of
incorporation by discontinuing from Bermuda to a
number of jurisdictions approved by the Bermuda Minister of
Finance. A company may make specific provisions for
discontinuance in its bye-laws, and may delegate authority to
the board of directors to exercise all of the companys
powers to discontinue the company. In the absence of such
provision, the decision to discontinue the company to another
jurisdiction must be made by the shareholders and require a
resolution passed by a simple
-98-
majority of the votes cast at a general meeting, provided that
at any such meeting any such share shall carry the right to vote
in respect of such discontinuance whether or not it otherwise
carries the right to vote.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws permit the Validus board, subject to
approval by a majority of shareholders, to exercise all the
powers of the company to discontinue the company.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws do not currently make specific provision for a
different majority vote or a different quorum than that which
has been set out in the Companies Act.
|
Amalgamation
The Companies Act provides that, unless specific provisions have
been made otherwise, the amalgamation of a company with another
company must be approved by a vote of three-fourths of the
shareholders voting at the meeting, and that the quorum for the
meeting shall be two persons holding or representing by proxy
more than one-third of the issued shares of the company of all
classes, whether ordinarily entitled to vote or not.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws do not currently make specific provision
for a different majority vote or a different quorum than that
which has been set out in the Companies Act.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws do not currently make specific provision for a
different majority vote or a different quorum than that which
has been set out in the Companies Act.
|
Duties
of Directors and Director Liability
The Companies Act provides that the business of a company is to
be managed and conducted by the board of directors. Under
Bermuda law, at common law, members of a board of directors owe
fiduciary and other duties to the company to act in good faith
in their dealings with or on behalf of the company and exercise
their powers and fulfill the duties of their office honestly.
This duty has the following essential elements:
|
|
|
|
|
a duty to act in good faith in the best interests of the company;
|
|
|
|
a duty not to make a personal profit from opportunities that
arise from the office of director;
|
|
|
|
a duty to avoid conflicts of interest; and
|
|
|
|
a duty to exercise powers for the purpose for which such powers
were intended.
|
The Companies Act imposes a duty on directors and officers of a
Bermuda company:
|
|
|
|
|
to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best
interests of the company;
|
|
|
|
to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably
prudent person would exercise in comparable
circumstances; and
|
|
|
|
to disclose material conflicts of interest to the board of the
company at the first opportunity.
|
In addition, the Companies Act imposes various duties on
directors and officers of a company with respect to certain
matters of management and administration of the company.
The Companies Act provides that in any proceedings for
negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust against
any officer, if it appears to a court that such officer is or
may be liable in respect of the negligence, default, breach of
duty or breach of trust, but that he or she has acted honestly
and reasonably, and that, having regard to all the circumstances
of the case, including those connected with his or her
appointment, he or she ought fairly to be excused for the
negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust, that
court may relieve him, either wholly or partly, from any
liability on such terms as the court may think fit. This
provision has been interpreted to apply only to actions brought
by or on behalf of the company against such officers.
The Companies Act also provides that a company may agree in its
bye-laws or by contract or some other arrangement to exempt or
indemnify its directors from any loss arising or liability
attaching to him or her by virtue of any rule of law in respect
of any negligence, default, breach of duty or trust in relation
to the company or any subsidiary thereof, except for any
liability in respect of any fraud or dishonesty, which would
otherwise attach to such director. See Indemnification of
Officers, Directors and Employees below.
-99-
Indemnification
of Officers, Directors and Employees
Bermuda law permits a company to indemnify its directors,
officers and auditors with respect to any loss arising or
liability attaching to such person by virtue of any rule of law
concerning any negligence, default, breach of duty, or breach of
trust of which the directors, officers or auditors may be guilty
in relation to the company or any of its subsidiaries;
provided that the company may not indemnify a director,
officer or auditor against any liability arising out of his or
her fraud or dishonesty. Bermuda law also permits a company to
indemnify its directors, officers and auditors against liability
incurred by them in defending any civil or criminal proceedings
in which judgment is given in their favor or in which they are
acquitted, or when the Court grants relief to them pursuant to
section 281 of the Companies Act. Bermuda law permits a
company to advance moneys to directors, officers and auditors to
defend civil or criminal proceedings against them on condition
that these moneys are repaid if the allegation of fraud or
dishonesty is proved. The Court may relieve directors and
officers from liability for negligence, default, breach of duty
or breach of trust if it appears to the Court that such director
or officer has acted honestly and reasonably and, in all the
circumstances, ought fairly to be excused.
Section 98A of the Companies Act permits companies to
purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any officer
or director in respect of any loss or liability attaching to him
or her in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or
breach of trust in relation to the company or any subsidiary
thereof, whether or not the company may otherwise indemnify such
officer or director.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws indemnify its directors, officers and (in the discretion of the board) employees and agents and their heirs, executors and administrators who were or are threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (including, without limitation, an action by or in the right of the company), by reason of his acting in such capacity or his acting in any other capacity for, or on behalf of, the company, against any liability or expense actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect thereof. In addition, the company shall, in the case of directors and officers, and may, in other cases, advance the expenses of defending any such act, suit or proceeding in accordance with and to the full extent now or hereafter permitted by law.
Under the Validus bye-laws, each shareholder agrees to waive any claim or right of action, other than those involving fraud or dishonesty, against any of the officers or directors of the company on account of any action taken by such director or officer, or the failure of such director or officer to take any action in the performance of his or her duties with or for the company.
Validus has purchased and maintains directors and officers liability policies for such purposes. Under the Validus bye-laws, no specific provision is made for the indemnification of directors and officers of the company in relation to the affairs of the companys subsidiaries, although (as noted above) such indemnification is not prohibited by Bermuda law.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws indemnify its directors, officers and secretary and their heirs, executors and administrators in respect of any actions, costs, charge, losses, damages and expenses incurred or sustained by or by reason of any act done, concurred in or omitted (actual or alleged) in or about the execution of their duty, or supposed duty, or in their respective offices or trusts; however this indemnity does not extend to any matter in respect of any willful negligence, willful default, fraud or dishonesty which may attach to any of said persons.
Under the IPC bye-laws, each shareholder agrees to waive any claim or right of action, other than those involving willful negligence, willful default, fraud or dishonesty, against any of the officers or directors of the company on account of any action taken by such director or officer, or the failure of such director or officer to take any action in the performance of his or her duties with or for the company.
IPC has purchased and maintains directors and officers liability policies for such purposes.
Under the IPC bye-laws, no specific provision is made for the indemnification of directors and officers of the company in relation to the affairs of the companys subsidiaries, although (as noted above) such indemnification is not prohibited by Bermuda law.
|
-100-
Shareholders
and Derivative Suits
The rights of shareholders under Bermuda law are not as
extensive as the rights of shareholders under legislation or
judicial precedent in many U.S. jurisdictions. Class
actions and derivative actions are generally not available to
shareholders under the laws of Bermuda. However, the Bermuda
courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law
precedent, which would permit a shareholder to commence an
action in the companys name to remedy a wrong done to the
company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond its
corporate power or is illegal or would result in the violation
of its memorandum of association or amended and restated
bye-laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by a Bermuda
court to acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud against the
minority shareholders or where an act requires the approval of a
greater percentage of shareholders than that which actually
approved it or where a power vested in the board of directors
has been exercised for an improper purpose. The winning party in
such an action generally would be able to recover a portion of
attorneys fees incurred in connection with such action.
When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner
which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of some part
of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to the
Court, which may make such order as it sees fit, including an
order regulating the conduct of the companys affairs in
the future or ordering the purchase of the shares of any
shareholders by other shareholders or by the company.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws provide that shareholders waive any claim
or right of action that they might have, whether individually or
by or in the right of the company, against any of its directors
or officers for any act or failure to act in the performance of
such directors or officers duties, except in respect
of any fraud or dishonesty which may attach to such director or
officer.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws provide that shareholders waive all claims or
rights of action that they might have, both individually or in
the right of the company, against any of its directors or
officers for any act or failure to act in the performance of
such directors or officers duties, except with
respect to any willful negligence, willful default, fraud or
dishonesty of such director or officer.
|
Amendment
of Memorandum of Association
Bermuda law provides that the memorandum of association of a
company may be amended by a resolution passed at a general
meeting of shareholders of which due notice has been given. An
amendment to the memorandum of association that alters a
companys business objects may require approval of the
Bermuda Minister of Finance, who may grant or withhold approval
at his or her discretion.
Under Bermuda law, the holders of an aggregate of not less than
20% in par value of a companys issued share capital or any
class thereof or the holders of not less than 20% of the
debentures entitled to object to amendments to the memorandum of
association have the right to apply to the Bermuda courts for an
annulment of any amendment to the memorandum of association
adopted by shareholders at any general meeting. This does not
apply to an amendment that alters or reduces a companys
share capital as provided in the Companies Act. Upon such
application, the alteration will not have effect until it is
confirmed by the Bermuda court. An application for an annulment
of an amendment to the memorandum of association must be made
within 21 days after the date on which the resolution
altering the companys memorandum of association is passed
and may be made on behalf of persons entitled to make the
application by one or more of their number as they may appoint
in writing for the purpose. No application may be made by
shareholders voting in favor of the amendment.
Amendment
of Bye-laws
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Consistent with Bermuda law, the Validus bye-laws may only be
amended by a resolution adopted by the board of directors and by
resolution of the shareholders.
|
|
Consistent with Bermuda law, the IPC bye-laws may only be
amended by a resolution adopted by the board of directors and by
resolution of the shareholders.
|
-101-
Preemptive
Rights
Under Bermuda law, no shareholder has a preemptive right to
subscribe for additional issues of a companys shares
unless, and to the extent that, the right is expressly granted
to the shareholder under the bye-laws of a company or under any
contract between the shareholder and the company.
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
The Validus bye-laws are silent with respect to preemptive
rights for shareholders.
|
|
The IPC bye-laws are silent with respect to preemptive rights
for shareholders.
|
Business
Combination Statutes
A Bermuda company may not enter into certain business
transactions with its significant shareholders or affiliates
without obtaining prior approval from its board of directors
and, in certain instances, its shareholders. Examples of such
business transactions include amalgamation, mergers, asset sales
and other transactions in which a significant shareholder or
affiliate receives or could receive a financial benefit that is
greater than that received or to be received by other
shareholders.
Approval
of Certain Transactions
The Companies Act is silent on whether a companys
shareholders are required to approve a sale, lease or exchange
of all or substantially all of a companys property and
assets. Bermuda law does require, however, that shareholders
approve certain forms of mergers and reconstructions.
Takeovers: Bermuda law provides that where an
offer is made for shares of a company and within four months of
the offer the holders of not less than 90% of the shares which
are the subject of the offer accept the offer, the offeror may,
by notice, require the non-tendering shareholders to transfer
their shares on the terms of the offer. dissenting shareholders
may apply to the Court within one month of the notice objecting
to the transfer. The burden is on the dissenting shareholders to
show that the Court should exercise its discretion to enjoin the
required transfer, which the Court will be unlikely to do unless
there is evidence of fraud or bad faith or collusion between the
offeror and the holders of the shares who have accepted the
offer as a means of unfairly forcing out minority shareholders.
Amalgamations: Pursuant to Bermuda law, the
amalgamation of a Bermuda company with another company or
corporation (other than certain affiliated companies) requires
the amalgamation agreement to be approved by the companys
board of directors and by its shareholders. Unless the
companys bye-laws provide otherwise, the approval of 75%
of the shareholders voting at such meeting is required to
approve the amalgamation agreement, and the quorum for such
meeting must be two or more persons holding or representing more
than one-third of the issued shares of the company. The required
vote of shareholders may be reduced by a companys
bye-laws. For purposes of approval of an amalgamation, all
shares, whether or not otherwise entitled to vote, carry the
right to vote. A separate vote of a class of shares is required
if the rights of such class would be altered by virtue of the
amalgamation. Any shareholder who does not vote in favor of the
amalgamation and who is not satisfied that he or she has been
offered fair value for his or her shares may, within one month
of receiving the companys notice of shareholder meeting to
consider the amalgamation, apply to the Court to appraise the
fair value of his or her shares. No appeal will lie from an
appraisal by the Court. The costs of any application to the
Court shall be in the discretion of the Court.
Inspection
of Books and Records; Shareholder Lists
Under Bermuda law, members of the general public have the right
to inspect a companys public documents available at the
office of the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda, which will
include a companys memorandum of association (including
its objects and powers) and certain alterations to its
memorandum of association, including any increase or reduction
of the companys authorized capital.
Registered shareholders have the additional right to inspect the
bye-laws, minutes of general meetings and audited financial
statements of a company, which must be presented to the annual
general meeting of shareholders. A companys register of
members is also open to inspection by shareholders, and to
members of the public, without charge. The register of members
is required to be open for inspection for not less than two
hours in any business day
-102-
(subject to the ability of a company to close the register of
members for not more than 30 days in a year). A company is
required to maintain a share register in Bermuda but may,
subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, establish a
branch register outside Bermuda. A company is required to keep
at its registered office a register of its directors and
officers which is open for inspection for not less than two
hours in any business day by members of the public without
charge. Bermuda law does not, however, provide a general right
for shareholders to inspect or obtain copies of any other
corporate records.
Appraisal
Rights/Dissenters Rights
Under Bermuda law, a dissenting shareholder of an amalgamating
company that does not believe it has been offered fair value for
its shares may apply to the Court to appraise the fair value of
its shares. Where the Court has appraised any such shares and
the amalgamation has been consummated prior to the appraisal
then, within one month of the Court appraising the value of the
shares, if the amount (if any) paid to the dissenting
shareholder for his or her shares is less than that appraised by
the Court, the amalgamated company shall pay to such shareholder
the difference between the amount paid to such shareholder and
the value appraised by the Court. Bermuda law provides for
dissenters rights in an amalgamation between
non-affiliated companies and affiliated companies where one
company is not a Bermuda company. Bermuda law additionally
provides a right of appraisal in respect of the situations
discussed under Required Purchase and Sale of Shares
below.
Required
Purchase and Sale of Shares
An acquiring party is generally able to acquire compulsorily the
common shares of minority holders in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
By a procedure under the Companies Act known as a scheme
of arrangement. A scheme of arrangement could be effected
by obtaining the agreement of the company and of holders of
common shares, representing in the aggregate a majority in
number and at least 75% in value of the common shareholders
(excluding shares owned by the acquirer) present and voting at a
court ordered meeting held to consider the scheme or
arrangement. The scheme of arrangement must then be sanctioned
by the Court. If a scheme of arrangement receives all necessary
agreements and sanctions, upon the filing of the Court order
with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda, all holders of
common shares could be compelled to sell their shares under the
terms of the scheme or arrangement;
|
|
|
|
If the acquiring party is a company it may compulsorily acquire
all the shares of the target company by acquiring, pursuant to a
tender offer, 90% in value of the shares or class of shares not
already owned by, or by a nominee for, the acquiring party (the
offeror), or any of its subsidiaries. If an offeror has, within
four months after the making of an offer for all the shares or
class of shares not owned by, or by a nominee for, the offeror,
or any of its subsidiaries, obtained the approval of the holders
of 90% or more in value of all the shares to which the offer
relates, the offeror may, at any time within two months
beginning with the date on which the approval was obtained,
require by notice any nontendering shareholder to transfer its
shares on the same terms as the original offer. In those
circumstances, nontendering shareholders could be compelled to
sell their shares unless the Court (on application made within a
one-month period from the date of the offerors notice of
its intention to acquire such shares) orders otherwise; or
|
|
|
|
Where one or more parties holds not less than 95% of the shares
or a class of shares of a company, such holder(s) may, pursuant
to a notice given to the remaining shareholders or class of
shareholders, acquire the shares of such remaining shareholders
or class of shareholders. When this notice is given, the
acquiring party is entitled and bound to acquire the shares of
the remaining shareholders on the terms set out in the notice,
unless a remaining shareholder, within one month of receiving
such notice, applies to the Court for an appraisal of the value
of their shares. This provision only applies where the acquiring
party offers the same terms to all holders of shares whose
shares are being acquired.
|
-103-
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF IPC COMMON SHARES
The following information (with the exception of the information
with respect to the IPC Shares of which the Participants are the
registered holder) is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
The table below sets forth certain information as of
April 29, 2009, (unless otherwise specified) with respect
to the beneficial ownership of IPC Shares by each person who is
known to IPC, based on filings made by such person under
Section 13(d) and Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act,
to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding common
shares, each person currently serving as a director of IPC, each
nominee for director, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer, each of the two most highly compensated
executive officers of IPC other than the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer and all directors and executive
officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial
|
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
Percentage(2)
|
|
FMR LLC
|
|
|
4,965,479
|
(3)
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin Resources, Inc.
|
|
|
3,926,292
|
(4)
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
One Franklin Parkway
San Mateo, California
94403-1906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA.
|
|
|
2,811,789
|
(5)
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
400 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark R. Bridges
|
|
|
891
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
James P. Bryce
|
|
|
324,524
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael J. Cascio
|
|
|
155
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter S. Christie
|
|
|
891
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Kenneth L. Hammond
|
|
|
891
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
L. Anthony Joaquin
|
|
|
891
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Antony P.D. Lancaster
|
|
|
891
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peter J.A. Cozens
|
|
|
140,340
|
(8)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephen F. Fallon
|
|
|
144,669
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John R. Weale
|
|
|
161,047
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
775,190
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
All Participants as a group
|
|
|
100
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% of the outstanding common shares. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In accordance with the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to
have beneficial ownership of common shares that such
person has the rights to acquire within 60 days. For
purposes of calculating percent ownership, each persons
holdings have been calculated assuming full exercise of
outstanding options currently exercisable or exercisable within
60 days by such person and by including such persons
restricted stock units and performance share units vesting
within 60 days, but not the exercise of options held by any
other person. All amounts listed represent sole investment and
voting power unless otherwise indicated. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on 55,948,821 common shares issued and outstanding at
March 26, 2009. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
According to information in the Schedule 13G/A filed on
February 17, 2009, FMR LLC had the following dispositive
powers with respect to common shares: (a) sole voting
power: none; (b) shared voting power: none; (c) sole
dispositive power: 4,965,479; and (d) shared dispositive
power: none. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
According to information reported in the Schedule 13G/A
filed on February 6, 2009, Franklin Resources, Inc. had the
following dispositive powers with respect to common shares:
(a) sole voting power: 3,862,492; (b) shared voting
power: none; (c) sole dispositive power: 3,926,292;
(d) shared dispositive power: none. |
-104-
|
|
|
(5) |
|
According to information reported in the Schedule 13G filed
on February 5, 2009, Barclays Global Investors, NA. had the
following dispositive powers with respect to common shares:
(a) sole voting power: 2,540,495; (b) shared voting
power: none; (c) sole dispositive power: 2,811,789;
(d) shared dispositive power: none. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Transfer-restricted common shares awarded as compensation for
his services as a Director. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes 581 common shares that are held by the IRA trustee for
Mr. Bryces wife, for which Mr. Bryce disclaims
beneficial ownership, 175,000 common shares issuable upon the
exercise of options and 7,429 transfer-restricted common shares. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Includes 81,250 common shares issuable upon the exercise of
options and 2,928 transfer-restricted common shares. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Includes 78,750 common shares issuable upon the exercise of
options and 2,556 transfer-restricted common shares. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Includes 115,750 common shares issuable upon the exercise of
options and 2,637 transfer-restricted common shares. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to IPC
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100 IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and
Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it
owns. None of the other Participants are registered holders of
IPC Shares. |
-105-
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a summary of the anticipated material
U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders
(as defined below) of IPC Shares of (i) the Scheme of
Arrangement and subsequent short-form amalgamation and
(ii) holding and disposing of the Validus Shares received
pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement. This summary is based on
provisions of the Code, Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder, administrative rulings and judicial decisions, each
as in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to
change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such
change could alter the tax consequences described herein. No
legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the
IRS has been requested, or is expected to be obtained, regarding
the U.S. federal income tax consequences described herein.
This discussion is not binding on the IRS or any court, and
there can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a contrary
position or that any contrary position taken by the IRS will not
be sustained by a court. This summary assumes that a
U.S. holder holds a Validus or IPC Share as a capital asset
within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally,
property held for investment).
For purposes of this summary, the term
U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of Validus
or IPC Shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or individual resident of the United States;
|
|
|
|
a corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, that is created or
organized under the laws of the United States or any of its
political subdivisions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a
court within the United States and the authority of one or more
U.S. persons, within the meaning of
Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code, to control all substantial
decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under
applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a
U.S. person; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to U.S. federal income tax on its
income regardless of its source.
|
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income
tax purposes holds Validus or IPC Shares, the U.S. federal
income tax treatment of such partnership and each partner will
generally depend on the status and the activities of the
partnership and the partner. Partnerships that hold Validus or
IPC Shares, and partners in such partnerships, should consult
their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state,
local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences applicable to them with respect to the Scheme of
Arrangement and short-form amalgamation and the disposition of
Validus Shares received pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement.
This summary does not address all of the U.S. federal
income tax consequences that may be applicable to a particular
holder of IPC Shares. In addition, this summary does not address
the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be
relevant to particular holders in light of their individual
circumstances or to holders that are subject to special rules,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
brokers or dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
banks and other financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts;
|
|
|
|
regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts,
partnerships (or any entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) and other pass-through
entities;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt entities;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark to market method
of accounting;
|
|
|
|
holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
holders who hold Validus or IPC Shares as part of a hedge,
appreciated financial position, straddle, conversion transaction
or other risk reduction strategy;
|
-106-
|
|
|
|
|
holders who acquired IPC Shares pursuant to the exercise of an
employee stock option or right or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
|
|
holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax
provisions of the Code;
|
|
|
|
except as provided herein, holders who own or have owned,
directly, indirectly, or constructively, 5% or more of IPC
Shares or will own 5% or more of Validus Shares pursuant to the
Scheme of Arrangement; and
|
|
|
|
holders of IPC Shares who dispose of their IPC Shares for cash
as part of a transaction that is integrated with the Scheme of
Arrangement and short-form amalgamation.
|
This summary does not address the tax consequences of the Scheme
of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation under state, local or
non-U.S. tax
laws, or federal tax laws other than those pertaining to income
tax.
This summary is provided for general information purposes
only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as,
legal or tax advice to any holder of IPC Shares. IPC
shareholders should consult their own tax advisors to determine
the particular tax consequences to them of the Scheme of
Arrangement and short-form amalgamation (including the
application and effect of any state, local or
non-U.S. and
other tax laws).
The
Scheme of Arrangement and Short-Form Amalgamation
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Scheme of
Arrangement and Short-Form Amalgamation. The
U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. holder
with respect to the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form
amalgamation depend in part on whether the Scheme of Arrangement
and short-form amalgamation are characterized as a single,
integrated transaction or as separate transactions for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Validus intends, and for
purposes of the following summary it is assumed, that the Scheme
of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation will be characterized
as a single, integrated transaction that qualifies as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We
will not seek a ruling from the IRS with regard to the
transactions. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the
IRS will not challenge the conclusions described below or that a
court would not sustain such a challenge.
If, as Validus intends, the Scheme of Arrangement and short-form
amalgamation are properly treated as part of an integrated
transaction that qualifies as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder of IPC
Shares will generally recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount
equal to the lesser of (i) the amount of cash received in
the Scheme of Arrangement, and (ii) the excess, if any, of
(a) the sum of the cash and fair market value of the
Validus Shares received by such U.S. holder (including the
fair market value of any fractional share deemed received), over
(b) the U.S. holders tax basis in the IPC Shares
exchanged therefor. For this purpose, U.S. holders of IPC
Shares must calculate gain (or disallowed loss) separately for
each identified block of IPC Shares exchanged (that is, IPC
Shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction). Cash
received in lieu of a fractional share of Validus Shares is not
taken into account in making these computations of gain
recognized in the Scheme of Arrangement. Rather, such cash
received in lieu of a fractional share is treated in the manner
described below.
Subject to the passive foreign investment company rules
discussed below or the potential application of
Section 1248 of the Code, any gain recognized in the Scheme
of Arrangement generally will be treated as capital gain, unless
the receipt of cash by a U.S. holder has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend for U.S. federal income tax
purposes (as discussed below). Any such capital gain will be
long-term capital gain if the U.S. holder has held the IPC
Shares for more than one year at the time of such exchange.
Under current law, long-term capital gain of non-corporate
shareholders is generally subject to tax at a maximum rate of
15%. If the receipt of cash has the effect of the distribution
of a dividend, the gain will be treated as dividend income to
the extent of the U.S. holders ratable share of
IPCs accumulated earnings and profits as calculated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Any gain of a
non-corporate U.S. holder which is treated as dividend
income will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax
at a maximum rate of 15%, provided certain holding period
requirements are met. A corporate U.S. holder will not be
entitled to a dividends received deduction for any gain which is
treated as dividend income that is otherwise generally available
upon the receipt of dividends distributed by
U.S. corporations.
-107-
The aggregate tax basis of the Validus Shares received by a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares in the Scheme of Arrangement
(including the basis in any fractional share of Validus Shares
deemed received) will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of
the U.S. holders IPC Shares exchanged in the Scheme
of Arrangement, decreased by the amount of cash received
(excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional share) and
increased by the amount of gain recognized in the Scheme of
Arrangement (including gain treated as dividend income but
excluding any gain recognized with respect to cash received in
lieu of a fractional share). The holding period of the Validus
Shares received by a U.S. holder of IPC Shares pursuant to
the Scheme of Arrangement will include the holding period of the
IPC Shares exchanged in the Scheme of Arrangement. If
U.S. holders of IPC Shares acquired different blocks of IPC
Shares at different times or at different prices, such
holders tax basis and holding period in their Validus
Shares may be determined with reference to each block of IPC
Shares exchanged.
In general, the determination as to whether gain recognized by a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares has the effect of a distribution
of a dividend depends upon whether, and to what extent, the
Scheme of Arrangement reduces the U.S. holders deemed
percentage share ownership in Validus. For purposes of this
determination, a U.S. holder of IPC Shares will be treated
as if it first exchanged all of its IPC Shares solely for
Validus Shares (instead of the combination of Validus Shares and
cash actually received), and then a portion of the Validus
Shares so received were immediately redeemed by Validus for the
cash (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional
Validus Share) that the holder actually received in the Scheme
of Arrangement. Subject to the passive foreign investment
company rules or the potential application of Section 1248
of the Code, the gain recognized will be treated as capital gain
if the deemed redemption is substantially
disproportionate or not essentially equivalent to a
dividend with respect to the U.S. holder of IPC
Shares.
In general, the deemed redemption will be substantially
disproportionate with respect to a U.S. holder of IPC
Shares if the stockholder experiences more than a 20% reduction
in its interest in Validus as a result of the deemed redemption.
In order for the deemed redemption to be not essentially
equivalent to a dividend, the deemed redemption must
result in a meaningful reduction in the IPC
shareholders deemed percentage share ownership of Validus
Shares. The IRS has indicated that a minority stockholder in a
publicly traded corporation whose relative stock interest is
minimal and who exercises no control with respect to corporate
affairs will experience a meaningful reduction if
that stockholder experiences any reduction in its percentage
stock ownership in connection with a transaction such as the
Scheme of Arrangement. In applying the foregoing tests, a
U.S. holder will, under the constructive ownership rules,
be deemed to own shares that are owned by certain related
persons or entities or with respect to which the
U.S. holder owns options, in addition to the shares
actually owned by that U.S. holder. Because the application
of these tests may be complex, IPC shareholders should consult
their own tax advisors regarding the possibility that all or a
portion of any cash received in exchange for IPC Shares will be
treated as a dividend.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares. Cash
received in lieu of a fractional share of Validus Shares will
generally be treated as received in redemption of such
fractional share interest, and a holder of IPC Shares will
recognize gain or loss measured by the difference between the
amount of cash received and the portion of the basis of the
Validus Shares allocable to such fractional interest. Subject to
Section 1248 of the Code and the passive foreign investment
company rules discussed below, such gain or loss generally will
constitute capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital
gain or loss if the U.S. holders holding period in
the IPC Shares exchanged was greater than one year as of the
date of the exchange.
Miscellaneous Reporting Requirements. If a
holder of IPC Shares receives Validus Shares in the Scheme of
Arrangement and, immediately before the Scheme of Arrangement,
such holder owned 5% or more, by vote or value, of IPC Shares,
the holder will be required to file a statement with its
U.S. federal income tax return for the year of the Scheme
of Arrangement. The statement must set forth the holder of IPC
Shares basis in, and the fair market value of, the IPC
Shares exchanged in the Scheme of Arrangement, the date of the
Scheme of Arrangement, and the name and employer identification
number of Validus and IPC, and such holder will be required to
retain permanent records of these facts.
Failure to Qualify as a Reorganization. If the
transaction fails to qualify as a reorganization, a
U.S. holder of IPC Shares would generally recognize gain or
loss equal to the difference, if any, between (i) the sum
of the fair market value of the Validus Shares received in the
Scheme of Arrangement and any cash received and (ii) such
-108-
shareholders adjusted tax basis in the IPC Shares
surrendered in exchange therefor. Subject to the passive foreign
investment company rules and Section 1248 of the Code,
discussed below, such recognized gain would generally constitute
capital gain or loss, and would constitute long-term capital
gain or loss if the IPC shareholders holding period for
the IPC Shares exchanged is greater than one year as of the date
of the exchange.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status of
IPC. A U.S. holder of IPC Shares may be
subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax rules in respect
of a disposition of IPC Shares, including a non-taxable
disposition pursuant to the Scheme of Arrangement, if IPC was
classified as a passive foreign investment company
(a PFIC) for any taxable year during which such
U.S. holder has held IPC Shares and does not have a valid
pedigreed qualified electing fund election in effect. Based on
its public filings, IPC has indicated that it does not believe
that it is a PFIC. However, the determination of PFIC status is
fundamentally factual in nature, depends on the application of
complex U.S. federal income tax rules which are subject to
differing interpretations, and generally cannot be determined
until the close of the taxable year in question. Further,
neither Validus nor Validus counsel has made any
determination regarding the PFIC status of IPC for any taxable
year. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that IPC has not
been classified as a PFIC for its current taxable year or any
other taxable year during which a U.S. holder holds IPC
Shares. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the classification of IPC as a PFIC, the effect of the
PFIC rules to such holder, and the availability and effect of
any election that may be available under the PFIC rules.
If IPC were treated as a PFIC as of the date of the Scheme of
Arrangement but Validus were not treated as a PFIC for the
current taxable year, the disposition of IPC Shares in the
Scheme of Arrangement may constitute a fully taxable transaction
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As discussed in
greater detail below, Validus does not believe that it will be
treated as a PFIC for the current taxable year and does not
expect to become a PFIC in the foreseeable future.
U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors
regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
Scheme of Arrangement and short-form amalgamation if IPC were
treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. holder.
Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting. Cash payments received by a
non-corporate U.S. holder of IPC common shares may, under
certain circumstances, be subject to information reporting and
backup withholding currently at a rate of 28%, unless the holder
provides proof of an applicable exemption or furnishes its
taxpayer identification number and otherwise complies with all
applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any
amounts withheld from payments to a holder under the backup
withholding rules are not additional tax and generally will be
allowed as a refund or credit against the holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required
information is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
Holding
and Disposing of Validus Shares
Distributions. Unless Validus is treated as a
PFIC, described below, the gross amount of distributions paid to
U.S. holders with respect to Validus Shares received in the
Scheme of Arrangement will be included in the gross income of
such U.S. holders, as dividend income, to the extent paid
out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Under
current law, dividends paid to a non-corporate U.S. holder
with respect to Validus Shares received in the Scheme of
Arrangement in taxable years beginning before January 1,
2011, that constitute qualified dividend income will
be taxable at a maximum tax rate of 15% if the U.S. holder
held such Validus Shares for more than 60 days during the
121-day
period that begins 60 days before the ex-dividend date and
meets certain other holding period requirements. Except as
discussed below with respect to backup withholding,
distributions paid by Validus to U.S. holders with respect
to Validus Shares received in the Scheme of Arrangement will not
be subject to U.S. withholding tax. A corporate
U.S. holder will not be entitled to a dividends received
deduction that is otherwise generally available upon the receipt
of dividends distributed by U.S. corporations.
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds the
current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year
of Validus, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles, the distribution will first be treated as a tax-free
return of capital, causing a reduction in the adjusted tax basis
of Validus Shares with regard to which the distribution was
made, and to the extent in excess of such basis, will be treated
as gain from the sale or exchange of
-109-
such shares. U.S. holders should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the amount of distributions from Validus
after the Scheme of Arrangement that are treated as dividends
for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Controlled Foreign Corporation Rules. Each
10% U.S. Shareholder (defined below) of a
foreign corporation that is a controlled foreign corporation
(CFC) for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or
more during a taxable year, and who owns shares in the CFC
directly, or indirectly through foreign entities, on the last
day, in such year, in which such corporation is a CFC must
include in its gross income for U.S. federal income tax
purposes its pro rata share of the CFCs subpart F
income, even if the subpart F income is not distributed. A
foreign corporation is considered a CFC if 10%
U.S. Shareholders own (directly, indirectly through
foreign entities or constructively pursuant to the application
of certain constructive ownership rules) more than 50% of
(i) the total combined voting power of all classes of
voting stock of such foreign corporation, or (ii) the total
value of all stock of such corporation. A 10%
U.S. Shareholder is a U.S. person who owns at least
10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock
entitled to vote of the foreign corporation. For purposes of
taking into account insurance income, a CFC also includes a
foreign insurance company in which more than 25% of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock (or more than 25%
of the total value of the stock) is owned (directly, indirectly
through foreign entities or constructively pursuant to the
application of certain constructive ownership rules) by 10%
U.S. Shareholders, on any day during the taxable year of
such corporation.
Under the bye-laws of Validus that limit voting power, no
U.S. person who owns Validus Shares directly or indirectly
through one or more
non-U.S. entities
should be treated as owning (directly, indirectly through
non-U.S. entities,
or constructively) 10% or more of the total voting power of all
classes of shares of Validus or any of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
As a result of this restriction, Validus believes that none of
its shareholders should be treated as a 10%
U.S. Shareholder of a CFC for purposes of these rules.
There can be no assurance, however, that the CFC rules will not
apply to shareholders of Validus, including as a result of their
indirect ownership of the stock of Validus subsidiaries.
Accordingly, U.S. persons who might, directly, indirectly,
or constructively acquire 10% or more of the common shares of
Validus or any of its subsidiaries should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the possible application of the CFC rules.
Related Person Insurance Income Rules. Any
U.S. person who owns Validus Shares. and hence indirectly
owns shares of Validus Reinsurance Ltd., IPCRe, or any of
Validus other insurance company subsidiaries, on the last
day of such insurance companys taxable year may be
required to include in its income for U.S. federal income
tax purposes its pro rata share of such insurance companys
related person insurance income (RPII) for the
taxable year if U.S. persons own, directly, indirectly or
constructively, 25% or more of the shares of such insurance
company for an uninterrupted period of at least 30 days
during the taxable year. In general, RPII means premium and
related investment income from the direct or indirect insurance
or reinsurance of any direct or indirect U.S. shareholder
of such insurance subsidiary, or any person related to such
shareholder, including Validus. U.S. persons who own shares
of an insurance company must include RPII in income only if such
companys RPII equals or exceeds 20% of its gross insurance
income in any taxable year and at least 20% of the stock of such
insurance company (measured by either voting power or value) is
owned, directly or indirectly (under complex attribution rules),
by (1) persons (including
non-U.S. persons)
who are insured, directly or indirectly, under policies of
insurance or reinsurance written by such insurance company or
(2) persons related to any such person. The amount of
income included is determined as if such RPII were distributed
proportionately to such U.S. persons on the last day of
such taxable year, regardless of whether such income is actually
distributed. A U.S. persons pro rata share of an
insurance subsidiarys RPII for any taxable year, however,
will not exceed its proportionate share of that
subsidiarys earnings and profits for the year (as
determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes). Validus
does not anticipate that any of its subsidiaries will have RPII
that equals or exceeds 20% of such subsidiarys gross
insurance income. Because some of the factors that determine the
extent of RPII in any period may be beyond Validus
control, there can be no assurance that RPII of any of its
insurance subsidiaries will not equal or exceed 20% of its gross
insurance income in any taxable year. In addition, it may be
difficult for Validus to determine whether it is 20% or more
owned (by either voting power or value), directly or indirectly
(under complex attribution rules), by insured or reinsured
persons or persons related to insured or reinsured persons.
-110-
If the RPII rules were to apply to any of Validus
insurance subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. persons tax basis in its Validus Shares would
be increased by the amount of any RPII that the shareholder
includes in income;
|
|
|
|
the shareholder could exclude from income the amount of any
distribution by Validus to the extent of the RPII included in
income for the year in which the distribution was paid or for
any prior year (which excluded amount would be applied to reduce
the U.S. persons tax basis in the Validus common
shares); and
|
|
|
|
each U.S. person who is a direct or indirect shareholder of
Validus on the last day of its taxable year would be required to
attach a Form 5471 to such persons income tax or
information return (failure to file Form 5471 may result in
the imposition of penalties).
|
There is a lack of definitive guidance interpreting the RPII
provisions. Accordingly, the meaning of the RPII provisions and
their application to Validus and its subsidiaries is uncertain.
In addition, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not
challenge any determinations by Validus or any of its
subsidiaries as to the amount, if any, of RPII that should be
includible in income or that the amounts of the RPII inclusions
will not be subject to adjustment based upon subsequent IRS
examination.
Foreign Tax Credit. It is anticipated that at
least 50% (determined by voting power or value) of the total
outstanding Validus Shares may be owned by U.S. persons.
Provided that Validus is so owned, dividends paid by Validus
will be treated, for purposes of determining the foreign tax
credit limitation, as partly
U.S.-source
and partly
non-U.S.-source,
in proportion to the source of Validus earnings and
profits for the year in which the dividend is paid. Any amounts
required to be included in income of U.S. holders under the
CFC rules or the RPII rules would also be partly
non-U.S.-source
and partly
U.S.-source.
For foreign tax credit limitation purposes, it is likely that
substantially all of the RPII and dividends that are
non-U.S.-source
income will constitute either passive or
general income. Because the calculation of a
taxpayers foreign tax credit limitation is complex and is
dependent on the particular taxpayers circumstances,
U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to these matters.
Sale, Exchange, Redemption or Other Taxable Disposition of
Shares. Subject to the discussion below relating
to the potential application of Section 1248 of the Code or
the PFIC rules, any gain or loss realized by a U.S. person
on the sale or other taxable disposition of Validus Shares
received in the Scheme of Arrangement will be subject to
U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss (which
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for
such Validus Shares exceeds one year on the date of such sale or
disposition) in an amount equal to the difference, if any,
between the amount realized upon such sale or exchange and such
persons tax basis in its Validus Shares. Preferential tax
rates currently apply to long-term capital gains of
non-corporate U.S. holders. Deductions for capital losses
are subject to significant limitations under the Code. Any gain
or loss will generally be treated as U.S. source gain or
loss for foreign tax credit limitation purposes, and any gain
will generally constitute passive income for these
purposes.
Section 1248 of the Code provides that if a
U.S. person sells or exchanges stock in a foreign
corporation and such person owned directly, indirectly through
certain foreign entities or constructively 10% or more of the
voting power of the corporation at any time during the five-year
period ending on the date of disposition when the corporation
was a CFC, any gain from the sale or exchange of the shares will
generally be treated as a dividend to the extent of the
CFCs earnings and profits (determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles) during the period that
the shareholder held the shares and while the corporation was a
CFC (with certain adjustments). A 10% U.S. Shareholder may
in certain circumstances be required to report a disposition of
shares of a CFC by attaching IRS Form 5471 to the
U.S. federal income tax or information return that it would
normally file for the taxable year in which the disposition
occurs.
Section 953(c)(7) of the Code generally provides that
Section 1248 of the Code will also apply to the sale or
exchange of shares in a
non-U.S. corporation
if the
non-U.S. corporation
would be taxed as an insurance company if it were a domestic
corporation and is 25% or more owned by U.S. persons,
regardless of whether the shareholder is a 10% shareholder or
whether RPII constitutes 20% or more of the corporations
gross insurance income. Existing Treasury regulations do not
address whether Section 1248 of the Code and the
requirement to file Form 5471 would apply if the
non-U.S. corporation
is not a CFC but the
non-U.S. corporation
has a subsidiary that is a CFC and that would be taxed as an
insurance company if it were a domestic corporation (although,
as discussed above, shareholders of 10% or more of the Validus
Shares may have an independent obligation to file
Form 5471). Validus
-111-
believes that Section 1248 of the Code will not apply to
dispositions of Validus Shares because (i) Validus should
not have any U.S. shareholders that own directly,
indirectly or constructively 10% or more of the voting power of
its common shares, and (ii) Validus is not directly engaged
in the insurance business and, under proposed Treasury
regulations, Sections 953(c)(7) and 1248 of the Code appear
to be applicable only in the case of shares of corporations that
are directly engaged in the insurance business. There can be no
assurance, however, that the IRS will interpret the proposed
Treasury regulations in this manner or that the proposed
Treasury regulations will not be amended or promulgated in final
form so as to provide that Section 1248 of the Code and the
requirement to file Form 5471 will apply to dispositions of
Validus Shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Considerations. Certain adverse U.S. federal
income tax rules generally apply to a U.S. person that owns
or disposes of stock in a
non-U.S. corporation
that is treated as a PFIC. In general, a
non-U.S. corporation
will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which
either (i) 75% or more of the
non-U.S. corporations
gross income is passive income, or (ii) 50% or more of the
average value of the
non-U.S. corporations
assets produce or are held for the production of passive income.
For these purposes, passive income generally includes dividends,
interest, and certain rents and royalties. The PFIC statutory
provisions, however, contain an exception for income derived in
the active conduct of an insurance business by a corporation
which is predominantly engaged in an insurance business.
Distributions constituting excess distributions, as
defined in Section 1291 of the Code, from a PFIC and
dispositions of shares of a PFIC generally are subject to the
highest applicable rate of tax on ordinary income in effect and
to an interest charge based on the value of the tax deferred
during the period during which the shares are owned.
Validus does not believe that it will be treated as a PFIC for
the current taxable year and does not expect to become a PFIC in
the foreseeable future. However, the determination of whether
Validus is a PFIC is made annually, and is based on the
activities, income and assets of Validus and its subsidiaries,
all of which are subject to change. Accordingly, no assurance
can be given that Validus will not become a PFIC in the future.
U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to how the PFIC rules could affect the sale, exchange,
redemption or other taxable disposition of Validus Shares
received in the Scheme of Arrangement or the receipt of any
distributions with respect to such Validus Shares.
Information
Reporting and Backup Withholding
In general, information reporting will apply to distributions
made with respect to, and proceeds received on the disposition
of, Validus Shares that are paid to a U.S. holder within
the United States (and, in certain cases, outside of the United
States), unless the U.S. holder establishes that it is an
exempt recipient, such as a corporation. Backup withholding
(currently imposed at a rate of 28%) may apply to such payment
if the U.S. holder fails to timely provide a taxpayer
identification number or certification of exempt status or fails
to report in full dividend and interest income. Backup
withholding tax is not an additional tax. A U.S. holder
subject to the backup withholding rules will be allowed a credit
of the amount withheld against such U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability and, if backup
withholding tax results in an overpayment of U.S. federal
income tax, such U.S. holder may be entitled to a refund,
provided that the requisite information is correctly furnished
to the IRS in a timely manner. U.S. holders should consult
their own tax advisors as to the information reporting and
backup withholding tax rules.
THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE
ANALYSIS OF ALL TAX CONSEQUENCES APPLICABLE TO U.S. HOLDERS
RELATING TO THE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT AND
SHORT-FORM AMALGAMATION AND THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION
OF VALIDUS SHARES AFTER THE SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT.
U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO
THE TAX CONSEQUENCES APPLICABLE TO THEM IN THEIR PARTICULAR
CIRCUMSTANCES.
-112-
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Validus
and IPC
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to IPC
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100 IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and
Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
Validus
Validus has established written procedures for the review of
transactions between Validus and any company affiliated with
funds managed by any of Validus sponsors (a
portfolio company) or any other company in which
Validus officers or directors have a material interest.
Any such transaction must be reviewed and approved by our
management or the management of the operating subsidiary
entering into the transaction, and the terms of such transaction
should be arms-length or on terms that are otherwise fair
to Validus. Any such transaction will also require prior
approval of the audit committee, except reinsurance assumed
transactions with a portfolio company that senior management has
determined are ordinary course. Furthermore, the effect, if any,
of such a transaction on the independence of any director will
be considered.
The employers of or entities associated with certain directors
or their affiliates have purchased or may in the future purchase
insurance
and/or
reinsurance from Validus on terms Validus believes were and will
be no more favorable to these insureds than those made available
to other customers.
Certain members of Validus management and staff have
provided guarantees to 1384 Capital Ltd, a company formed to
indirectly facilitate the provision of Funds at Lloyds
(FAL).
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Validus compensation committee is composed of John J.
Hendrickson, Sander M. Levy, Mandakini Puri, Sumit Rajpal and
Alok Singh. Each member of Validus compensation committee,
other than Messrs. Hendrickson and Singh, has a
relationship with entities with which Validus has engaged in
certain transactions described below. Entities affiliated with
Messrs. Hendrickson and Singh acquired common shares at the
time of Validus formation and are parties to Validus
shareholder agreement described below.
Shareholders
Agreement and Related Provisions
Certain of Validus shareholders who acquired Validus
common shares prior to the date of Validus initial public
offering (the existing shareholders) and Validus
have entered into a shareholders agreement dated as of
December 12, 2005 that governs certain relationships among,
and contains certain rights and obligations of, such existing
shareholders.
In connection with any future public offerings of common shares
by Validus, the shareholders agreement grants those
existing shareholders certain rights to participate in
registered offerings by Validus of its common shares, including
demand and piggyback registration
rights. The shareholders agreement defines Aquiline,
Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, Vestar Capital Partners, New
Mountain Capital, LLC and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity as
sponsors. So long as a sponsor continues to
beneficially hold at least
1/3
of its original common shares, a sponsor is deemed to be a
qualified sponsor. The shareholders agreement
permits qualified sponsors to make up to four demand
registrations.
These demand and piggyback registration rights are subject to
limitations as to the maximum number of shares that may be
registered if the managing underwriter in such an offering
advises that the number of common shares offered should be
limited due to market conditions or otherwise. Validus is
required to pay all expenses incurred in connection with demand
and piggyback registrations, excluding, in the case of demand
registrations, underwriting discounts and commissions.
Each of Goldman Sachs Capital Partners and Merrill Lynch Global
Private Equity is entitled to require pursuant to the
shareholders agreement that Validus appoint each of
Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch to act as a
-113-
lead managing underwriter for certain demand registrations;
provided that each of Goldman Sachs and
Merrill Lynch individually is recognized at the time as a
leading underwriter for such securities and affiliates of
Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch are qualified sponsors at such
time and the terms offered are market terms.
Additionally, the shareholders agreement provides that
existing shareholders as well as affiliates, directors,
officers, employees and agents of existing shareholders are
permitted to engage in activities or businesses that are
competitive with us. This section of the shareholders
agreement also specifically releases existing shareholders from
any obligation to refer business opportunities to Validus and
establishes that no existing shareholder has any fiduciary or
other duties to Validus.
IPC
The following information is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
IPCs
Policies and Procedures for Review, Approval or Ratification of
Related Person Transactions
IPCs written Code of Conduct requires Directors and all
employees to notify IPC of transactions involving IPC and a
member of the immediate family of a Director or an employee, or
an individual who has a close personal relationship with a
Director or an employee of IPC. Conflicts of interest are
prohibited under IPCs Code of Conduct, unless they have
been approved by IPC. All Directors and officers are required to
complete an annual questionnaire to certify their compliance
with IPCs Code of Conduct.
When IPC becomes aware of a proposed or existing transaction
with a related party, the company secretary, in consultation
with management and external counsel, as appropriate, determines
whether the transaction would require proxy disclosure as a
related-party transaction. If such a determination is made,
management and the company secretary, in consultation with
external counsel, determine whether, in their view, the
transaction should be permitted, whether it should be modified
to avoid any potential conflict of interest, should be
terminated, or whether some other action should be taken. If
deemed necessary, such action is then referred to IPCs
Executive Committee, at its next meeting (or earlier, if
appropriate), for review and final determination as it deems
appropriate.
-114-
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Except as set forth below, Validus will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust
company or other nominee for the solicitation of proxies in
connection with this solicitation.
Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, facsimile,
telegraph, the internet,
e-mail,
newspapers and other publications of general distribution and in
person. Solicitation of proxies will be made by the director and
executive officers of Validus and its subsidiaries listed on
Schedule I hereto without any additional remuneration
(except as otherwise set forth in this proxy statement).
Validus has retained Georgeson for solicitation and advisory
services in connection with solicitations relating to the
court-ordered IPC meeting, for which Georgeson may receive a fee
of up to $100,000 in connection with the solicitation of proxies
for the court-ordered IPC meeting. Up to 100 people may be
employed by Georgeson in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the court-ordered IPC meeting. Validus has also
agreed to reimburse Georgeson for out-of-pocket expenses and to
indemnify Georgeson against certain liabilities and expenses,
including reasonable legal fees and related charges. Georgeson
will solicit proxies for the court-ordered IPC meeting from
individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other
institutional holders. The entire expense of soliciting proxies
for the court-ordered IPC meeting by or on behalf of Validus is
being borne by Validus.
If you have any questions concerning this proxy statement or the
procedures to be followed to execute and deliver a proxy, please
contact Georgeson at the address or phone number specified above.
-115-
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR IPCS 2010 ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING
The following information is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
If IPC shareholders wish to submit a proposal to be considered
for inclusion in the proxy materials for IPCs 2010 annual
general meeting or propose a nominee for the board of directors,
please send it to the Secretary, IPC Holdings, Ltd., American
International Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08,
Bermuda. Under the rules of the SEC, proposals must be received
no later than December 30, 2009, to be eligible for
inclusion in IPCs 2010 annual general meeting proxy
statement. If a shareholder wishes to submit a proposal to
IPCs 2010 annual general meeting without including such
proposal in the proxy statement for that meeting, that proposal
will be considered untimely if IPC is not notified of such
proposal by March 15, 2010.
-116-
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Validus and IPC file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy any reports, statements or other information that
Validus and IPC file with the SEC at the SECs public
reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the public reference
room. These SEC filings are also available to the public from
the Internet worldwide website maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
Reports, proxy statements and other information, with respect to
Validus, may also be inspected at the offices of the New York
Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York, 10005,
and, with respect to IPC, may also be inspected at the offices
of The NASDAQ Stock Market, One Liberty Plaza, 165 Broadway, New
York, NY 10006.
If you are a Validus shareholder, some of the documents
previously filed with the SEC may have been sent to you, but you
can also obtain any of them through Validus, the SEC or the
SECs Internet website as described above. Documents filed
with the SEC are available from Validus without charge,
excluding all exhibits, except that, if Validus has specifically
incorporated by reference an exhibit in this proxy statement,
the exhibit will also be provided without charge.
You may obtain documents filed with the SEC by requesting them
in writing or by telephone from Validus at the following
addresses:
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
(441) 278-9000
Attention: Jon Levenson
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least five business days
before the date of the court-ordered IPC meeting. This means
you must request this information no later than
[ ], 2009. Validus will mail
properly requested documents to requesting shareholders by first
class mail, or another equally prompt means, within one business
day after receipt of such request.
You can also get more information by visiting Validus
website at
http://www.validusre.bm
and IPCs website at
http://www.ipcre.bm.
Materials from these websites and other websites mentioned in
this proxy statement are not incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement. If you are viewing this proxy statement in
electronic format, each of the URLs mentioned in this proxy
statement is an active textual reference only.
The SEC allows Validus to incorporate by reference
information in this proxy statement, which means that Validus
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
another document filed separately with the SEC. The information
incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this
proxy statement, except for any information that is superseded
by information included directly in this proxy statement. This
proxy statement incorporates by reference the documents set
forth below that Validus and IPC have previously filed with the
SEC. These documents contain important information about Validus
and IPC and their financial condition, business and results.
-117-
|
|
|
Validus Filings
|
|
|
(Commission File
No. 001-33606)
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on: February 9, 2009, March 31, 2009, April 3, 2009,
April 9, 2009, April 16, 2009, April 28, 2009, April 30,
2009, May 5, 2009, May 6, 2009, May 11, 2009, May 12,
2009, May 14, 2009, May 18, 2009, May 20, 2009,
May 22, 2009, June 1, 2009 and June 8, 2009
(other than any portions of any documents not deemed to be
filed, although the
Form 8-K
filed on May 12, 2009 (Film No. 09816281) was
furnished and not filed with the SEC, it is specifically
incorporated by reference herein notwithstanding any other
provisions to the contrary.)
|
The description of Validus common shares contained in its
registration statement on
Form S-3,
including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating the description.
|
|
Filed on August 7, 2008
|
|
|
|
IPC Filings
|
|
|
(Commission File
No. 000-27662)
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (as amended on Form
10-K/A filed on April 30, 2009)
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on: March 2, 2009, March 10, 2009, March 11, 2009, March
31, 2009, April 7, 2009, May 1, 2009, June 5, 2009,
June 12, 2009 and June 15, 2009 (other than any
portions of any documents not deemed to be filed)
|
The description of IPC common shares contained in its
registration statement on
Form S-3,
including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating the description.
|
|
Filed on April 27, 2006
|
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on
Schedule 14D-9
|
|
Filed on May 14, 2009, as it may be amended from time to time
|
Validus also incorporates by reference into this proxy statement
each document filed by Validus or IPC with the SEC pursuant to
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after
the date of this proxy statement, but before the date of
Validus shareholder meeting. To the extent, however,
required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, Validus will
amend this proxy statement to include information filed after
the date of this proxy statement.
Validus has supplied all of the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement relating to
Validus, as well as all unaudited pro forma financial
information. All information contained or incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement relating to IPC has been
obtained from public filings filed by IPC with the SEC.
-118-
SCHEDULE I
INFORMATION
CONCERNING THE DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
OF
VALIDUS AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES WHO ARE PARTICIPANTS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to each director and executive officer of Validus and its
subsidiaries that is a participant in the solicitation. The
current business address of each person is 19 Par-La-Ville
Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda and the current business telephone
number is
(441) 278-9000.
Each such person is a citizen of the United States and each
occupation set forth opposite an individuals name refers
to employment with Validus.
DIRECTOR
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or Employment, Material
Positions
|
Name
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years
|
|
Edward J. Noonan
|
|
Mr. Noonan has been Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer of Validus since its formation. He has
27 years of experience in the insurance and reinsurance
industry, serving most recently as the acting chief executive
officer of United America Indemnity Ltd. (NASDAQ: INDM) from
February 2005 through October 2005 and as a member of the board
of directors from December 2003 to May 2007. Mr. Noonan served
as president and chief executive officer of American
Re-Insurance Company from 1997 to 2002, having joined American
Re in 1983. Mr. Noonan also served as chairman of Inter-Ocean
Reinsurance Holdings of Hamilton, Bermuda from 1997 to 2002.
Prior to joining American Re, Mr. Noonan worked at Swiss
Reinsurance from 1979 to 1983.
|
I-1
PARTICIPANT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
Present Principal Occupation or Employment, Material
Positions
|
Name
|
|
Held During the Past Five Years
|
|
Edward J. Noonan
|
|
Mr. Noonan has been Chairman of the Board and the Chief
Executive Officer of Validus since its formation. He has
27 years of experience in the insurance and reinsurance
industry, serving most recently as the acting chief executive
officer of United America Indemnity Ltd. (NASDAQ: INDM) from
February 2005 through October 2005 and as a member of the board
of directors from December 2003 to May 2007. Mr. Noonan served
as president and chief executive officer of American
Re-Insurance Company from 1997 to 2002, having joined American
Re in 1983. Mr. Noonan also served as chairman of Inter-Ocean
Reinsurance Holdings of Hamilton, Bermuda from 1997 to 2002.
Prior to joining American Re, Mr. Noonan worked at Swiss
Reinsurance from 1979 to 1983.
|
Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
|
Mr. Consolino has been Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Validus since March 2006. He has over
16 years of experience in the financial services industry,
specifically in providing investment banking services to the
insurance industry, and most recently served as a managing
director in Merrill Lynchs Financial Institutions Group
specializing in insurance company advisory and financing
transactions. He serves as a Director of National Interstate
Corporation, a property and casualty company based in Ohio, and
of AmWINS Group, Inc., a wholesale insurance broker based in
North Carolina.
|
Jonathan B. Levenson
|
|
Jonathan B. Levenson is a Senior Vice President of Validus
Reinsurance, Ltd., having joined the company in June 2006.
Mr. Levenson has 16 years of industry experience,
serving most recently as a member of the equity research team at
Dowling & Partners Securities. Mr. Levenson was a
Senior Vice President at reinsurance broker Benfield, Inc. from
2002-2005.
Prior to that, Mr. Levenson was a Senior Vice President and
underwriter at Swiss Re Underwriters Agency Inc., a unit of
Swiss Reinsurance.
|
I-2
Annex
A
FORM OF
THE
SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BERMUDA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
(COMMERCIAL COURT)
|
|
|
No.
[ l ]
of 2009
|
|
IN THE
MATTER OF IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
- and
-
IN THE
MATTER OF SECTION 99 OF THE BERMUDA COMPANIES ACT 1981
A-1
PRELIMINARY
In this Scheme, unless inconsistent with the subject or context,
the following expressions bear the following meanings:
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
the proposed acquisition of IPC by Validus |
|
Allowed Proceeding |
|
any proceeding by a holder of Scheme Shares to enforce its
rights under this Scheme in the event Validus or IPC fails to
perform its obligations under this Scheme |
|
Business Day |
|
any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which
banking institutions in New York or Bermuda are obligated by law
or executive order to be closed |
|
|
|
Cash Consideration |
|
the cash consideration payable to holders of Scheme Shares
pursuant to the terms of this Scheme, being the sum of $3.75 for
each Scheme Share |
|
|
|
Closing Validus Share Price |
|
the closing price per share of Validus common stock as reported
on the NYSE on the last trading day prior to the Effective Time |
|
Conditions |
|
the conditions to the effectiveness of this Scheme set forth in
the Schedule A attached hereto |
|
Court |
|
the Supreme Court of Bermuda |
|
Court Hearing |
|
the hearing of the Court to sanction this Scheme under
section 99 of the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 |
|
Effective Time |
|
the time and date on which this Scheme becomes effective in
accordance with clause 9.1 of this Scheme |
|
Exchange Agent |
|
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services |
|
Excluded Shares |
|
any IPC Shares which are registered in the name of, or
beneficially owned by Validus, IPC or any of their respective
subsidiaries, or which Validus, IPC or any of their respective
subsidiaries acquires or becomes beneficially interested in from
time to time |
|
IPC |
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company whose principal
executive offices are located at American International
Building, 29 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda |
|
IPC Shares |
|
shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of IPC |
|
Max |
|
Max Capital Group Ltd. |
|
Max Amalgamation Agreement |
|
the Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation dated 1 March 2009,
as amended on 5 March 2009, among Max, IPC and IPC Limited |
|
Max Termination Fee |
|
the termination fee that may be payable by IPC to Max in certain
circumstances pursuant to the terms of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement |
|
New Validus Shares |
|
the new shares of voting common stock, par value $0.175 per
share, of Validus to be issued credited as fully paid pursuant
to this Scheme |
|
NYSE |
|
The New York Stock Exchange |
|
Prohibited Proceeding |
|
any process, suit, action, legal or other proceeding including
without limitation any arbitration, mediation, alternative
dispute resolution, judicial review, adjudication, demand,
execution, restraint, forfeiture, |
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
re-entry, seizure, lien, enforcement of judgment, enforcement of
any security or enforcement of any letter of credit against
Validus or IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries or their
respective property in any jurisdiction whatsoever other than an
Allowed Proceeding |
|
Record Date |
|
6.00 p.m. (Atlantic Time) on
[ l ]
2009 |
|
Register of Members |
|
IPCs register of members or any branch register kept in
accordance with section 65 of the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 |
|
Registrar |
|
the Bermuda Registrar of Companies |
|
Requisition Proxy Statement |
|
the proxy statement on Schedule 14A pursuant to
Section 14a of the United States Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, to be sent to holders of IPC Shares in
connection with approval at the Special General Meeting of
resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably necessary in
connection with implementation of this Scheme, containing,
inter alia, the notice of the Special General Meeting |
|
Scheme |
|
this scheme of arrangement in its present form or with or
subject to any modification, addition or condition approved or
imposed by the Court and agreed by Validus |
|
Scheme Court Order |
|
the order of the Court sanctioning this Scheme pursuant to
section 99 of the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 |
|
Scheme Meeting |
|
the meeting of holders of IPC Shares as at the Record Date
convened by order of the Court pursuant to section 99 of
the Bermuda Companies Act 1981 to consider and, if thought fit,
approve this Scheme (with or without amendment), including any
adjournment or postponement thereof |
|
Scheme Proxy Statement |
|
the proxy statement on Schedule 14A pursuant to
Section 14a of the United States Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, to be sent to holders of IPC Shares in
connection with approval at the Scheme Meeting of this Scheme,
containing, inter alia details of this Scheme and the
notice of the Scheme Meeting |
|
Scheme Shares |
|
all IPC Shares which are in issue immediately prior to the
Effective Time, other than the Excluded Shares |
|
|
|
Special General Meeting |
|
the special general meeting of IPC at which the holders of IPC
Shares as at the record date for such meeting may consider and,
if they so determine, approve resolutions determined by Validus
to be reasonably necessary in connection with implementation of
this Scheme, including resolutions for IPC to approve and to be
bound by this Scheme, notice of which is to be set out in the
Requisition Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
Validus |
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated under
the laws of Bermuda with its principal executive offices at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda |
|
United States |
|
the United States of America, its territories and possessions,
any state of the United States of America and the District of
Columbia |
|
$ or United States dollars |
|
the lawful currency of the United States |
and references to clauses and sub-clauses are to clauses and
sub-clauses of this Scheme.
A-3
|
|
(A) |
As at the date of this Scheme, the authorised share capital of
IPC is
$[ l ]
divided into
[ l ]
IPC Shares. As at the close of business on
[ l ]
2009, being the latest practicable date prior to the posting of
the Scheme Proxy Statement,
[ l ]
IPC Shares have been issued and are credited as fully paid and
the remainder are unissued.
|
|
|
(B) |
As at the date of this Scheme, 100 IPC Shares, representing less
than one per cent. of the existing issued share capital of IPC
are registered in the name of Validus.
|
|
|
(C) |
Validus has agreed to appear, and to procure that the registered
holders of any IPC Shares which it or any of its subsidiaries
beneficially owns to agree to appear, by Counsel at the Court
Hearing and to be bound by, and to undertake to the Court to be
bound by, the provisions of this Scheme and to execute and do or
procure to be executed and done all such documents, acts and
things as may be necessary or desirable to be executed and done
by it for the purposes of giving effect to this Scheme.
|
|
|
1.
|
PURPOSE
OF THIS SCHEME
|
|
|
1.1 |
The purpose of this Scheme is to effect the exchange of each
Scheme Share for 1.1234 New Validus Shares and the Cash
Consideration. At the Effective Time, all Scheme Shares shall be
transferred to Validus and as a result thereof IPC shall become
a wholly owned subsidiary of Validus. In furtherance of this
Scheme, following the Effective Time Validus shall issue and
allot the New Validus Shares and pay the Cash Consideration to
the holders of Scheme Shares in accordance with the terms of
this Scheme.
|
|
|
2.
|
APPLICATION
AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS SCHEME
|
|
|
2.1 |
The compromise and arrangement effected by this Scheme shall
apply to all Scheme Shares and shall be binding on IPC and on
all holders of Scheme Shares. With effect from the Effective
Time, until such time as the Scheme Shares have been transferred
to Validus, there shall be no further registration of transfers
on the Register of Members of any Scheme Shares.
|
|
|
3.1 |
The holders of IPC Shares and the number of IPC Shares that they
hold for the purposes of voting at the Scheme Meeting shall be
determined as those recorded on the Register of Members as at
the Record Date.
|
|
|
4.
|
NEW
VALIDUS SHARES AND CASH CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
4.1 |
Conditional upon and subject to clause 5, Validus shall, in
consideration for the transfer of the Scheme Shares, and subject
as hereinafter provided, allot and issue, credited as fully
paid, to each holder of Scheme Shares (as appearing in the
Register of Members immediately prior to the Effective Time),
New Validus Shares on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
for each
Scheme Share |
1.1234
New Validus Shares |
|
|
|
4.2
|
Fractional entitlements to New Validus Shares will not be
allotted or issued to holders of Scheme Shares. Holders of
Scheme Shares shall be paid cash in lieu of any fractional
entitlement to which they would otherwise be entitled. The cash
amount to be paid to such holders of Scheme Shares shall be
determined by multiplying the relevant fraction by the Closing
Validus Share Price.
|
|
4.3
|
In addition to the New Validus Shares to be issued in accordance
with the provisions of sub-clause 4.1, conditional upon and
subject to clause 5, Validus shall, in consideration for
the transfer of the Scheme Shares, and subject as hereinafter
provided, pay or procure the payment to or for the account of
each holder of Scheme Shares (as appearing in the Register of
Members immediately prior to the Effective Time), the Cash
Consideration on the following basis:
|
|
|
|
for each
Scheme Share |
$3.75 in
cash |
|
A-4
|
|
5.
|
ACQUISITION
OF SCHEME SHARES
|
|
|
5.1
|
At the Effective Time, in consideration for the consideration
provided for in clause 4, notwithstanding any term of any
relevant document to the contrary, the Scheme Shares shall be
transferred to Validus and such transfer shall forthwith be
registered on the Register of Members.
|
|
5.2
|
With effect from and including the Effective Time, each holder
of Scheme Shares shall in accordance with this Scheme cease to
have any rights with respect to Scheme Shares, except the right
to receive the consideration provided for in clause 4.
|
|
5.3
|
Validus shall acquire the Scheme Shares fully paid and free from
all liens, equitable interests, charges, encumbrances and rights
of pre-emption and any other interests of any nature whatsoever
and together with all rights attaching thereto including the
right to receive and retain all dividends and other
distributions declared, paid or made thereon, on or after the
Effective Time, other than any pro rata dividend payable by IPC
in respect of the reduction, if any, of the Max Termination Fee.
|
|
5.4
|
For such purposes, the Scheme Shares shall be transferred to
Validus or its nominees and to give effect to such transfer any
person may be appointed by Validus as attorney and shall be
authorised as such attorney on behalf of the holder concerned to
execute and deliver as transferor a form of transfer or other
instrument or instruction of transfer of any Scheme Shares and
every form, instrument or instruction of transfer so executed
shall be as effective as if it had been executed by the holder
or holders of the Scheme Shares thereby transferred.
|
|
|
6.1 |
With effect from and including the Effective Time, each existing
certificate representing a holding of Scheme Shares shall cease
to be valid in respect of such holding and each holder of Scheme
Shares shall be bound at the request of Validus to deliver up
the same to Validus or to any person appointed by Validus to
receive the same for cancellation or to destroy such share
certificates.
|
|
|
7.
|
DESPATCH
OF CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
7.1
|
At or about the Effective Time, Validus shall deposit the New
Validus Shares required to be issued by it under this Scheme and
an amount in cash in immediately available funds sufficient to
satisfy the aggregate amount of the Cash Consideration payable
by Validus pursuant to the terms of this Scheme with the
Exchange Agent (or such other person or entity as Validus may
determine in its sole discretion) acting on behalf of and for
the account of the holders of Scheme Shares. Promptly after the
Effective Time, Validus shall procure that the Exchange Agent
(or such other person or entity as Validus may determine in its
sole discretion) shall mail each holder of Scheme Shares
instructions for surrendering share certificates in respect of
Scheme Shares or for non-certificated Scheme Shares represented
by book entry and that the Exchange Agent shall:
(i) transfer such New Validus Shares; and (ii) pay the
Cash Consideration (less any applicable withholding taxes and
without interest) to each holder of Scheme Shares in accordance
with their respective entitlements under this Scheme promptly
following the Exchange Agents receipt of the share
certificates in respect of Scheme Shares or non-certificated
Scheme Shares represented by book entry from such holder of
Scheme Shares. In addition, Validus will direct the Exchange
Agent (or such other person or entity as Validus may determine
in its sole discretion) to pay (out of funds previously provided
by Validus) to each holder of Scheme Shares entitled thereto a
cash payment in respect of any amount payable to such holder of
Scheme Shares pursuant to sub-clause 4.2, less any
applicable withholding taxes, together with the transfer to such
holder of Scheme Shares of the New Validus Shares and the
payment of the Cash Consideration to which it is entitled under
the terms of this Scheme. Payment of the Cash Consideration and
any amounts payable to holders of Scheme Shares pursuant to
sub-clause 4.2 shall be settled by way of a cheque or in
such other manner as Validus shall, in its discretion, consider
appropriate.
|
|
7.2
|
No interest will be paid or accrued on the cash payable upon the
surrender of any share certificate (or book-entry shares). Until
surrendered in accordance with the provisions of this
clause 7, each share certificate in respect of Scheme
Shares or non-certificated Scheme Shares represented by book
entry will represent after
|
A-5
|
|
|
the Effective Time for all purposes only evidence of the right
to receive the consideration due to each holder of Scheme Shares
provided for in clause 4.
|
|
|
7.3
|
All deliveries of cheques, certificates or other documents
required to be made to holders of Scheme Shares pursuant to this
Scheme shall be effected by sending the same by mail in prepaid
envelopes addressed to the persons entitled thereto at their
respective registered addresses as appearing in the Register of
Members immediately prior to the Effective Time (or, in the case
of joint holders, at the address of the joint holder who appears
first in the said register) and none of IPC, Validus, any person
appointed by Validus pursuant to sub-clause 5.4 or any of
their respective agents or nominees shall be responsible for any
loss or delay in the transmission of any cheques, certificates
or other documents sent in accordance with this
sub-clause 7.3, which shall be sent at the risk of the
person or persons entitled thereto.
|
|
7.4
|
All cheques shall be in United States dollars and shall be made
payable to the person or persons to whom, in accordance with the
foregoing provisions of this clause 7, the envelope
containing the same is addressed, and the encashment of any such
cheque shall be a complete discharge of Validus obligation
under this Scheme to pay for the monies represented thereby.
|
|
7.5
|
The preceding sub-clauses of this clause 7 shall take
effect subject to any prohibition or condition imposed by law.
|
|
|
8.1 |
All mandates and other instructions to IPC in force immediately
prior to the Effective Time relating to Scheme Shares shall,
unless and until revoked or amended, be deemed as from the
Effective Time to be valid and effective mandates and
instructions to Validus in relation to the New Validus Shares
issued in respect thereof.
|
|
|
9.1
|
This Scheme shall become effective in accordance with its terms
as soon as an office copy of the Scheme Court Order shall have
been delivered to the Registrar for registration.
|
|
9.2
|
Unless this Scheme shall become effective on or before
30 November 2009, or such later date, if any, as Validus
may determine and the Court may allow, this Scheme shall never
become effective.
|
|
|
10.1 |
Validus may consent on behalf of all persons concerned to any
modification of or addition to this Scheme or to any condition
which the Court may approve or impose.
|
|
|
11.
|
STAY OF
PROHIBITED PROCEEDINGS
|
|
|
11.1
|
No holder of Scheme Shares shall commence a Prohibited
Proceeding in respect of or arising from this Scheme after the
Effective Time.
|
|
11.2
|
A holder of Scheme Shares may commence an Allowed Proceeding
against Validus or IPC after the Effective Time provided that it
has first given Validus ten Business Days prior notice in
writing of its intention to do so.
|
|
|
12.1 |
When under any provision of this Scheme a matter is to be
determined by Validus, it will have discretion to interpret such
matter under this Scheme in a manner that it considers fair and
reasonable, and its decisions will be binding on all concerned.
|
|
|
13.
|
PRE-CONDITIONS
TO THIS SCHEME
|
|
|
13.1 |
The effectiveness of this Scheme is conditional upon the
satisfaction or, where relevant, waiver of the Conditions prior
to the commencement of the Court Hearing.
|
A-6
|
|
14.
|
GOVERNING
LAW AND JURISDICTION
|
|
|
14.1 |
The terms of this Scheme shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of Bermuda and the Courts of Bermuda
shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any
suit, action or proceeding and to settle any dispute which
arises out of or connected with the terms of this Scheme or
their implementation or out of any action taken or omitted to be
taken under this Scheme or in connection with the administration
of this Scheme.
|
Dated
[ l ]
2009
A-7
Schedule A
CONDITIONS
TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS SCHEME
This Scheme is conditional upon the following having occurred on
or before 30 November 2009, or such later date, if any, as
Validus may determine and the Court may allow:
1. the approval of this Scheme by a majority in number of
the holders of IPC Shares entitled to vote and present and
voting, either in person or by proxy, at the Scheme Meeting, or
at any adjournment of such meeting, representing three-fourths
or more in value of the IPC Shares entitled to vote and present
and voting, either in person or by proxy, at the Scheme Meeting,
or at any adjournment of such meeting;
2. all resolutions determined by Validus to be reasonably
necessary in connection with the implementation of this Scheme
to be considered at the Special General Meeting being duly
passed by the requisite majority at the Special General Meeting,
or at any adjournment of that meeting, and not subsequently
being revoked and the matters provided for in such resolutions
becoming effective;
3. the sanction (without modification or with modification
as agreed by Validus) of this Scheme by the Court; and
4. the delivery of an office copy of the court order
sanctioning this Scheme to the Registrar.
In addition, this Scheme is also conditional upon the following
Conditions, and, accordingly, the necessary actions to make this
Scheme effective, including the delivery of an office copy of
the court order sanctioning this Scheme to the Registrar, will
not be taken unless such Conditions (as amended if appropriate)
have, in the judgment of Validus, been satisfied (and continue
to be satisfied pending the commencement of the Court Hearing)
or where relevant waived:
Max
Amalgamation Agreement Condition
Validus shall reasonably believe that IPC could not have any
liability with respect to the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, and Max shall not have asserted any
claim of liability or breach against IPC in connection with the
Max Amalgamation Agreement, in each case, other than with
respect to the possible payment of the Max Termination Fee
thereunder.
Registration
Condition
The issuance of the New Validus Shares shall have been
registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, pursuant to an effective registration statement, or
shall be exempt from the registration requirements thereof.
Shareholder
Approval Condition
The shareholders of Validus shall have approved the issuance of
the New Validus Shares as required under the rules of the NYSE.
NYSE
Listing Condition
The New Validus Shares shall have been authorized for listing on
the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
Pending
Litigation Condition
There shall be no threatened or pending litigation, suit, claim,
action, proceeding or investigation before any supranational,
national, state, provincial, municipal or local government,
governmental, regulatory or administrative authority, agency,
instrumentality or commission or any court, tribunal or judicial
or arbitral body (a governmental authority):
(1) challenging or seeking to, or which, in the judgment of
Validus, is reasonably likely to, make illegal, delay or
otherwise, directly or indirectly, restrain or prohibit or in
which there are allegations of any violation of law, rule or
regulation relating to, the proposing of, or terms or provisions
of, this Scheme or, the
A-8
transfer of all of the outstanding IPC Shares (excluding any IPC
Shares owned by Validus, IPC or any of their respective
subsidiaries) to Validus in exchange for shares in Validus; or
(2) seeking to, or which in the judgment of Validus, is
reasonably likely to, prohibit or limit the full rights of
ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates,
including, without limitation, the right to vote any IPC Shares
acquired by Validus pursuant to this Scheme or otherwise on all
matters properly presented to IPC shareholders.
No
Material Adverse Change Condition
Since December 31, 2008, there shall not have been any
change, state of facts, circumstance or event that has had, or
would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect
on the financial condition, properties, assets, liabilities,
obligations (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or
otherwise), businesses or results of operations of IPC and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, excluding any such change, state
of facts, circumstance or event to the extent caused by or
resulting from: (i) changes in economic, market, business,
regulatory or political conditions generally in the United
States or in Bermuda or any other jurisdiction in which such
party operates or in Bermudan, United States or global financial
markets; (ii) changes, circumstances or events generally
affecting the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance
industry in the geographic areas in which such party operates;
(iii) changes, circumstances or events resulting in
liabilities under property catastrophe reinsurance, including
any effects resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado,
windstorm, terrorist act, act of war or other natural or
man-made disaster; (iv) changes in any applicable law,
statute, ordinance, common law, arbitration award, or any rule,
regulation, judgment, order, writ, injunction, decree, agency
requirement or published interpretation of any governmental
authority, including all relevant bye-laws and regulations of
the Council and Society of Lloyds incorporated under the
Lloyds Act of 1871 to 1982 of England and Wales in each of
the jurisdictions in which IPC or its subsidiaries currently
conduct business or operate (specified laws);
(v) changes in generally accepted accounting principles or
in statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the
applicable jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance
regulatory authority, including accounting and financial
reporting pronouncements by the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners and the Financial Accounting Standards
Board; (vi) any change or announcement of a potential
change in IPCs or any of its subsidiaries credit or
claims paying rating or A.M. Best rating or the ratings of
any of IPCs or its subsidiaries businesses or
securities; (vii) a change in the trading prices or volume
of IPC Shares; (viii) the failure to meet any revenue,
earnings or other projections, forecasts or predictions for any
period ending after the date of the Scheme Proxy Statement; or
(ix) the commencement, occurrence or continuation of any
war or armed hostilities, except that (A) in the case of
the foregoing clauses (vi), (vii) and (viii), such
exceptions shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination
that any changes, state of facts, circumstances or events
underlying a failure described in any such clause has resulted
in, or contributed to, a material adverse effect on IPC and its
subsidiaries and (B) in the case of the foregoing clauses
(i), (ii), (iv), (v) and (ix), to the extent those changes,
state of facts, circumstances or events have a materially
disproportionate effect on IPC and its subsidiaries taken as a
whole relative to other similarly situated persons in the
property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry. In
addition, a material adverse effect shall be deemed to have
occurred if IPCs book value shall have (A) declined
by more than 50% from December 31, 2008 to the commencement
of the Court Hearing or (B) declined from December 31,
2008 to the commencement of the Court Hearing by more than 20%
greater than the percentage decline of Validus book value
during the same period, provided, that for purposes of measuring
the 20% differential book value decline, if Validus has
experienced an increase in book value from December 31,
2008 to the commencement of the Court Hearing, Validus shall be
deemed to have experienced no change in its book value. Any such
materially adverse change, state of facts, circumstance or event
or decline in IPCs book value described above are referred
to herein as a material adverse effect.
Conduct
of Business Condition
Each of IPC and its subsidiaries shall have carried on their
respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with
past practice at all times on or after the date of the Scheme
Proxy Statement and prior to the commencement of the Court
Hearing.
A-9
Validus
Credit Facilities Condition
All amendments or waivers under Validus credit facilities
necessary to consummate this Scheme and the other transactions
contemplated by the Scheme Proxy Statement and by the
Requisition Proxy Statement shall be in full force and effect.
Other
Conditions
None of the following events or facts shall have occurred:
(a) there is in effect any order or injunction issued by
any court of competent jurisdiction or any action taken, or any
specified law enacted, entered, enforced or deemed applicable to
this Scheme or the other transactions contemplated by the Scheme
Proxy Statement or the Requisition Proxy Statement by any
governmental authority of competent jurisdiction which imposes
any term, condition, obligation or restriction upon Validus, IPC
or any of their respective subsidiaries that would, individually
or the aggregate, reasonably be likely to (A) have a
material adverse effect (assuming all references to IPC in the
definition of material adverse effect were instead
references to Validus) on Validus and its subsidiaries (assuming
consummation of the Acquisition) on a consolidated basis
following the Effective Time or (B) directly or indirectly
(i) delay or otherwise restrain, impede or prohibit this
Scheme or (ii) prohibit or limit the full rights of
ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or any of its affiliates,
including, without limitation, the right to vote any IPC Shares
acquired by Validus pursuant to this Scheme or otherwise on all
matters properly presented to IPC shareholders;
(b) IPC or any of its subsidiaries has (1) permitted
the issuance or sale of any shares of any class of share capital
or other securities of any subsidiary of IPC (other than IPC
Shares issued pursuant to, and in accordance with, the terms in
effect on the date of the Scheme Proxy Statement of employee
stock options, stock units or other similar awards outstanding
prior to the date of the Scheme Proxy Statement),
(2) declared, paid or proposed to declare or pay any
dividend or other distribution on any share capital of IPC
(other than (A) any quarterly cash dividends paid in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice to
holders of IPC Shares and (B) a one-time dividend to the
holders of IPC Shares in an aggregate amount not to exceed any
reduction in the Max Termination Fee), including by adoption of
a shareholders rights plan (or similar plan) which has not
otherwise been terminated or rendered inapplicable to this
Scheme prior to the commencement of the Court Hearing, or
(3) amended, or authorized or proposed any amendment to,
its articles of incorporation or bye-laws (or other similar
constituent documents) or Validus becomes aware that IPC or any
of its subsidiaries shall have amended, or authorized or
proposed any amendment to, its articles of incorporation or
bye-laws (or other similar constituent documents) in a manner
that, in the reasonable judgment of Validus, is reasonably
likely to, directly or indirectly, (A) delay or otherwise
restrain, impede or prohibit this Scheme or (B) prohibit or
limit the full rights of ownership of IPC Shares by Validus or
any of its affiliates, including, without limitation, the right
to vote any IPC Shares acquired by Validus pursuant to this
Scheme or otherwise on all matters properly presented to IPC
shareholders;
(c) Validus or any of its affiliates enters into a
definitive agreement or announces an agreement in principle with
IPC providing for an amalgamation or other business combination
or transaction with or involving IPC or any of its subsidiaries,
or the purchase or exchange of securities or assets of IPC or
any of its subsidiaries, whereby Validus or any of its
subsidiaries acquires securities of IPC, or Validus accepts for
exchange under an exchange offer at least 90% of the IPC Shares
which it sought to acquire under that offer, or Validus and IPC
reach any other agreement or understanding, in either case,
pursuant to which it is agreed or provided that this Scheme will
not be implemented; or
(d) IPC or any of its subsidiaries has (1) granted to
any person proposing an amalgamation or other business
combination with or involving IPC or any of its subsidiaries or
the purchase or exchange of securities or assets of IPC or any
of its subsidiaries any type of option, warrant or right which,
in Validus judgment, constitutes a
lock-up
device (including, without limitation, a right to acquire or
receive any IPC Shares or other securities, assets or business
of IPC or any of its subsidiaries), (2) paid or agreed to
pay any cash or other consideration to any party in connection
with or in any way related to any such business combination,
purchase or exchange (other than the Max Termination Fee) or
(3) amended the Max Amalgamation Agreement in any respect
that alters IPCs rights or obligations upon termination of
the Max Amalgamation Agreement (other than a reduction of the
Max Termination Fee);
A-10
which in the reasonable judgment of Validus in any such case,
and regardless of the circumstances giving rise to any such
condition (other than any event or circumstance giving rise to
the triggering of a condition within the direct or indirect
control of Validus), makes it inadvisable to proceed with this
Scheme.
The foregoing Conditions are for the sole benefit of Validus and
may be asserted by Validus regardless of the circumstances
giving rise to the right to assert any such Condition (other
than any event or circumstance giving rise to the triggering of
a condition within the direct or indirect control of Validus)
or, other than the Conditions numbered 1 to 4 (inclusive) above,
the Registration Condition, the Shareholder
Approval Condition and the NYSE Listing
Condition (collectively the Unwaivable
Conditions), may be waived by Validus in whole or in part
at any time and from time to time prior to the commencement of
the Court Hearing in its discretion. Validus expressly reserves
the right to waive any of the Conditions, other than the
Unwaivable Conditions, and to make any change in the terms of or
conditions to this Scheme. The failure by Validus at any time to
exercise any of the foregoing rights shall not be deemed a
waiver of any such right; the waiver of any such right with
respect to particular facts and other circumstances shall not be
deemed a waiver with respect to any other facts and
circumstances; and each such right shall be deemed an ongoing
right that may be asserted at any time and from time to time
until the commencement of the Court Hearing or the earlier
lapse, termination or withdrawal of this Scheme.
This Scheme will not proceed unless all the above Conditions are
satisfied or, where relevant, waived or, where appropriate,
determined by Validus to have been satisfied or to remain
satisfied prior to the commencement of the Court Hearing.
Validus shall be under no obligation to waive or treat as
satisfied any of the Conditions set forth following Condition 4
above (the Non-Procedural Conditions) by a date
earlier than 30 November 2009, or such later date, if any,
as Validus may determine and the Court may allow,
notwithstanding that the Non-Procedural Conditions may at such
earlier date have been waived or satisfied and that there are at
such earlier date no circumstances indicating that any of such
Non-Procedural Conditions may not be capable of being satisfied.
Any determination by Validus concerning any Condition or event
described in this Scheme (including this
Schedule A) shall be final and binding on all parties
to the fullest extent permitted by law.
A-11
IMPORTANT
1. If
your IPC Shares are held in your own name, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed
BLUE proxy card to Validus Holdings, Ltd., care of Georgeson Inc., in the postage-paid envelope
provided.
2. If your IPC Shares are held in street-name, only your bank, broker or other nominee can
vote your IPC Shares and only upon receipt of your specific instructions. If your IPC Shares are
held in street-name, follow the instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee
or contact the person responsible for your account to vote on your behalf. Validus urges you to
confirm in writing your instructions to the person responsible for your account and to provide a
copy of those instructions to Validus Holdings, Ltd., care of Georgeson Inc., 199 Water Street,
26th Floor, New York, New York 10038, at (888) 274-5119, so that Validus will be aware of all
instructions given and can attempt to ensure that such instructions are followed.
3. Only
IPCs shareholders of record on
[ l ], 2009 are entitled to vote at the court-ordered
IPC meeting. Validus urges each holder of IPC
Share(s) to complete, sign, date, and return the enclosed BLUE proxy card as soon as possible.
If you have any questions or need assistance in voting your IPC Shares, please contact:
199 Water Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call: (212) 440-9800
or
Toll Free: at (888) 274-5119
Email: validusIPC@georgeson.com
PRELIMINARY COPY, DATED JUNE 23, 2009 SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VALIDUS
RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL BELOW. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are an
IPC shareholder of record and you sign and return a proxy card
without giving specific voting instructions, or you hold your IPC
Shares in street name and you sign and return your voting instruction
form without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be
voted for the proposal being presented at the court-ordered IPC meeting,
and as the proxyholders may determine in their discretion with
respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote before
such meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote on
Proposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
To approve the
Scheme of Arrangement. |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
Please
sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) herein. If you are acting as
an attorney-in-fact, corporate officer, or in a fiduciary capacity,
please indicate the capacity in which you are signing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
[PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] |
|
Date |
|
Signature (Joint Owners) |
|
Date |
|
PRELIMINARY
COPY, DATED JUNE 23, 2009 SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please complete, date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the envelope provided
as soon as possible.
TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY
PROXY
IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSAL AT THE
COURT-ORDERED MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
OF
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
The
undersigned holder of common shares, $0.01 par value per share (the IPC Shares), of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC) hereby appoints Edward J. Noonan
and C. Jerome Dill and/or each of them, with full power of substitution, to be its proxy and to vote for the undersigned
on all matters arising at the court-ordered meeting of shareholders of IPC, to be held at [], Atlantic Time, on [], 2009 at [], or any
adjournment or postponement thereof and to represent the undersigned
at such meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
THE IPC SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS
CONTAINED HEREIN. IF NO INSTRUCTION IS GIVEN, THE SHARES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSAL ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, ALL SAID ITEMS BEING FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE
NOTICE OF SUCH MEETING, DATED [], 2009, AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT, RECEIPT OF WHICH ARE ACKNOWLEDGED. THE UNDERSIGNED RATIFIES AND CONFIRMS
ALL THAT SAID PROXIES OR THEIR SUBSTITUTES MAY LAWFULLY DO BY VIRTUE
HEREOF. THIS PROXY WILL REVOKE (OR BE USED BY THE PROXIES TO REVOKE) ANY PRIOR
PROXY DELIVERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE COURT-ORDERED IPC MEETING.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)