6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
Commission File Number 1-15182
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED
(Translation of registrants name into English)
7-1-27, Ameerpet
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 016, India
+91-40-23731946
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if
submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if
submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must
furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is
incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrants home country), or under the rules
of the home country exchange on which the registrants securities are traded, as long as the
report or other document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been
distributed to the registrants security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already
been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): 82- .
QUARTERLY REPORT
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
Currency of Presentation and Certain Defined Terms
In this Quarterly Report, references to $ or dollars or U.S.$ or U.S. dollars are to the
legal currency of the United States and references to Rs. or rupees or Indian rupees are to
the legal currency of India. Our financial statements are presented in Indian rupees and are
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. Convenience translation
into U.S. dollars with respect to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements
is also presented. References to a particular fiscal year are to our fiscal year ended March 31
of such year References to ADS are to our American Depositary Shares, to the FASB are to the
Financial Accounting Standards Board, to SFAS are to the Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards, to SAB are to Staff Accounting Bulletin and to the EITF are to the Emerging Issues
Task Force. All references to IAS are to the International Accounting Standards, to IASB are to
the International Accounting Standards Board, to IFRS are to International Financial Reporting
Standards, to SIC are Standing Interpretations Committee and to IFRIC are to the International
Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee.
References to U.S. FDA are to the United States Food and Drug Administration, to NDAs are to
New Drug Applications, and to ANDAs are to Abbreviated New Drug Applications.
References to U.S. or United States are to the United States of America, its territories and
its possessions. References to India are to the Republic of India. All references to we, us,
our, DRL, Dr. Reddys or the Company shall mean Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited and its
subsidiaries. Dr. Reddys is a registered trademark of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited in India.
Other trademarks or trade names used in this Quarterly Report are trademarks registered in the name
of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited or are pending before the respective trademark registries.
Except as otherwise stated in this report, all translations from Indian rupees to U.S. dollars are
based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York on September 30, 2008 for cable transfers in
Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which was
Rs.46.45 per U.S.$1.00. No representation is made that the Indian rupee amounts have been, could
have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at such a rate or any other rate. Any
discrepancies in any table between totals and sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.
Information contained in our website, www.drreddys.com, is not part of this Quarterly Report and no
portion of such information is incorporated herein.
Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statement
IN ADDITION TO HISTORICAL INFORMATION, THIS QUARTERLY REPORT CONTAINS CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED AND SECTION
21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED
HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER
MATERIALLY FROM THOSE REFLECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT MIGHT CAUSE SUCH A
DIFFERENCE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE SECTION ENTITLED OPERATING AND
FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE
ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH REFLECT OUR ANALYSIS ONLY AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. IN
ADDITION, READERS SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THE INFORMATION IN OUR PERIODIC REPORTS AND OTHER
DOCUMENTS FILED AND/OR FURNISHED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) FROM TIME TO
TIME.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
4 |
|
ITEM 2. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW |
|
|
51 |
|
ITEM 3. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
|
|
57 |
|
ITEM 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS |
|
|
58 |
|
ITEM 5. TREND INFORMATION |
|
|
59 |
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS |
|
|
62 |
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
63 |
|
EX 99.1: INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON REVIEW OF UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Particulars |
|
Note |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
9 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
435,283 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,218,904 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,765,432 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
393,883 |
|
|
|
18,295,861 |
|
|
|
16,997,288 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
403,506 |
|
|
|
18,742,869 |
|
|
|
16,755,508 |
|
Investment in equity accounted investees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,179 |
|
|
|
240,548 |
|
|
|
237,054 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
150,636 |
|
|
|
80,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
1,241,094 |
|
|
Rs. |
57,648,818 |
|
|
Rs. |
50,838,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
12 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
331,045 |
|
|
Rs. 15,377,021 |
|
Rs.11,132,830 |
Trade receivables, net of allowances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,364 |
|
|
|
10,375,245 |
|
|
|
6,823,448 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,102 |
|
|
|
5,718,082 |
|
|
|
3,858,155 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
1,328,721 |
|
|
|
4,753,580 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
110,236 |
|
|
|
5,120,446 |
|
|
|
7,421,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
816,351 |
|
|
Rs. |
37,919,515 |
|
|
Rs. |
33,989,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
2,057,445 |
|
|
Rs.95,568,333 |
|
Rs.84,827,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
18,127 |
|
|
Rs. |
842,004 |
|
|
Rs. |
840,864 |
|
Share premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,204 |
|
|
|
20,168,788 |
|
|
|
20,036,473 |
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,748 |
|
|
|
2,914,634 |
|
|
|
1,566,499 |
|
Share based payment reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,956 |
|
|
|
694,684 |
|
|
|
709,006 |
|
Hedging reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,216 |
) |
|
|
(567,421 |
) |
|
|
(6,642 |
) |
Equity shares held by controlled trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
551,921 |
|
|
|
25,636,732 |
|
|
|
24,211,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
1,069,834 |
|
|
Rs.49,693,774 |
|
Rs.47,350,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term loans and borrowings,
excluding current portion |
|
|
19 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
257,670 |
|
|
Rs.11,968,768 |
|
Rs. |
12,697,550 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
171,762 |
|
|
|
122,901 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,578 |
|
|
|
398,435 |
|
|
|
323,378 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,921 |
|
|
|
4,641,345 |
|
|
|
4,856,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
369,867 |
|
|
Rs.17,180,310 |
|
Rs.18,000,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft |
|
|
13 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
31,953 |
|
|
Rs.1,484,232 |
|
Rs. |
434,928 |
|
Short term loans and borrowings |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
133,282 |
|
|
|
6,190,948 |
|
|
|
4,427,781 |
|
Long term loans and borrowings, current
portion |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
54,798 |
|
|
|
2,545,360 |
|
|
|
1,791,004 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,409 |
|
|
|
8,194,217 |
|
|
|
5,426,546 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,615 |
|
|
|
1,468,501 |
|
|
|
626,999 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,688 |
|
|
|
8,810,991 |
|
|
|
6,769,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
617,745 |
|
|
Rs.28,694,249 |
|
Rs.19,476,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
987,612 |
|
|
Rs .45,874,559 |
|
Rs.37,476,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
2,057,445 |
|
|
Rs.95,568,333 |
|
Rs.84,827,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements.
4
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM INCOME STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Particulars |
|
Note |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
671,448 |
|
|
Rs. |
31,188,773 |
|
|
Rs. |
24,434,270 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,150,970 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,451,213 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,663 |
|
|
|
15,730,910 |
|
|
|
12,083,881 |
|
|
|
8,187,444 |
|
|
|
6,169,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
332,785 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,457,863 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,350,389 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,963,526 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,281,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,276 |
|
|
|
10,371,162 |
|
|
|
7,998,889 |
|
|
|
5,285,810 |
|
|
|
4,417,584 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,361 |
|
|
|
1,874,764 |
|
|
|
1,615,846 |
|
|
|
824,694 |
|
|
|
809,569 |
|
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7,075 |
|
|
|
328,616 |
|
|
|
(151,389 |
) |
|
|
87,511 |
|
|
|
(68,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
270,711 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,574,542 |
|
|
Rs. |
9,463,346 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,198,015 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,158,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,074 |
|
|
|
2,883,321 |
|
|
|
2,887,043 |
|
|
|
1,765,511 |
|
|
|
1,123,067 |
|
Finance income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
|
236,791 |
|
|
|
1,053,846 |
|
|
|
92,570 |
|
|
|
477,570 |
|
Finance expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,823 |
) |
|
|
(642,098 |
) |
|
|
(593,669 |
) |
|
|
(574,907 |
) |
|
|
(175,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income/(expense), net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(8,726 |
) |
|
|
(405, 307 |
) |
|
|
460,177 |
|
|
|
(482,337 |
) |
|
|
301,766 |
|
Share of profit/(loss) of equity
accounted investees, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,392 |
|
|
|
2,480,067 |
|
|
|
3,346,617 |
|
|
|
1,284,930 |
|
|
|
1,428,258 |
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(6,806 |
) |
|
|
(316,144 |
) |
|
|
776,786 |
|
|
|
(232,298 |
) |
|
|
1,098,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
46,586 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,163,923 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,123,403 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,052,632 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,526,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,586 |
|
|
|
2,163,923 |
|
|
|
4,127,523 |
|
|
|
1,052,632 |
|
|
|
2,527,857 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
46,586 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,163,923 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,123,403 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,052,632 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,526,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share of Rs.5/- each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
12.86 |
|
|
|
24.57 |
|
|
Rs. |
6.25 |
|
|
Rs. |
15.04 |
|
Diluted earnings per share of Rs.5/- each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
12.80 |
|
|
|
24.46 |
|
|
Rs. |
6.23 |
|
|
Rs. |
14.99 |
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements.
5
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain/(loss) on other |
|
Foreign currency |
|
Share based pay- |
Particulars |
|
Share capital |
|
|
Share premium |
|
investments |
|
translation reserve |
|
ment reserve |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
Balance as of April 1, 2008 |
|
|
168,172,746 |
|
|
Rs. |
840,864 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,036,473 |
|
|
Rs. |
(1,757 |
) |
|
Rs. |
1,566,499 |
|
|
Rs. |
709,006 |
|
Issue of
equity shares on exercise of options |
|
|
227,982 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
132,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128,622 |
) |
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,300 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investments,
net of tax expense of Rs.2,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange translation
adjustments, net of tax expense of
Rs.137,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of changes in fair
value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
benefit of Rs.288,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September30, 2008 |
|
|
168,400,728 |
|
|
Rs. |
842,004 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,168,788 |
|
|
Rs. |
9,235 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,914,634 |
|
|
Rs. |
694,684 |
|
|
|
|
Convenience translation into U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
18,127 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
434,204 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
199 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
62,748 |
|
|
U.S.$ |
14,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2007 |
|
|
167,912,180 |
|
|
Rs. |
839,561 |
|
|
Rs. |
19,908,837 |
|
|
Rs. |
(125,182 |
) |
|
Rs. |
342,858 |
|
|
Rs. |
564,937 |
|
Issue of
equity share on exercise of options |
|
|
185,262 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
93,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,222 |
) |
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,664 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investments,
net of tax expense of Rs.18,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182,982 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007 |
|
|
168,097,442 |
|
|
Rs. |
840,488 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,002,082 |
|
|
Rs. |
(51,428 |
) |
|
Rs. |
159,876 |
|
|
Rs. |
588,379 |
|
|
|
|
[Continued
in next page]
6
[Continued
from table on page 6, first column(s) repeated]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity shares held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by a controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Particulars |
|
Hedging reserve |
|
trust* |
|
Retained earnings |
|
Minority interest |
|
Total equity |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
Balance as of April 1, 2008 |
|
Rs. |
(6,642 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
24,211,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
47,350,814 |
|
Issue of
equity shares on exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,300 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,163,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,163,923 |
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738,444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738,444 |
) |
Changes in fair value of investments,
net of tax expense of Rs.2,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,992 |
|
Foreign exchange translation
adjustments, net of tax expense of
Rs.137,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348,135 |
|
Effective portion of changes in fair
value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
benefit of Rs.288,758 |
|
|
(560,779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(560,779 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
Rs. |
(567,421 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
25,636,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
49,693,774 |
|
|
|
|
Convenience translation into U.S.$ |
|
U.S.$ |
(12,216 |
) |
|
U.S.$ |
(105 |
) |
|
U.S.$ |
551,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
1,069,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
21,101,794 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,473 |
|
|
Rs. |
42,638,396 |
|
Issue of equity share on exercise of
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,950 |
|
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,664 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,127,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,127,523 |
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(737,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(737,287 |
) |
Changes in fair value of investments,
net of tax expense of Rs.18,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,754 |
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182,982 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,120 |
) |
|
|
(4,120 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
24,492,030 |
|
|
Rs.6,353 |
|
Rs. |
46,032,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The number of equity shares held by a controlled trust as of April 1, 2007, September 30,
2007, April 1, 2008 and September 30, 2008 is 82,800. |
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements.
7
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended September 30, |
|
Particulars |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from/(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
U.S.$ |
46,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
2,163,923 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,123,403 |
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,144 |
|
|
|
(776,786 |
) |
Profit on sale of investments |
|
|
(2,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,078 |
) |
|
|
(16,186 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,930,322 |
|
|
|
1,555,586 |
|
Allowances for doubtful trade receivable |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,243 |
|
|
|
28,065 |
|
Inventory write-downs |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,915 |
|
|
|
163,299 |
|
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,516 |
) |
|
|
1,138 |
|
Equity in (profit)/loss of equity accounted investees |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
603 |
|
Unrealized exchange (gain)/loss, net |
|
|
(12,221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(567,649 |
) |
|
|
(46,855 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
8,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,464 |
|
|
|
114,679 |
|
Share based payment expense |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,300 |
|
|
|
107,664 |
|
Negative goodwill on acquisition of business |
|
|
(3,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(58,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,705,422 |
) |
|
|
(1,113,861 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(69,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,238,876 |
) |
|
|
(2,483,965 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(7,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,330,779 |
) |
Trade payables |
|
|
38,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,808,741 |
|
|
|
1,852,090 |
|
Other liabilities and provisions |
|
|
12,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588,470 |
|
|
|
739,270 |
|
Income tax paid |
|
|
(11,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525,937 |
) |
|
|
(617,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from/(used in) operating activities |
|
U.S.$ |
(4,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
(200,474 |
) |
|
Rs. |
2,300,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(55,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,576,330 |
) |
|
|
(2,261,327 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,570 |
|
|
|
13,680 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(185,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,600,759 |
) |
|
|
(5,750,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
261,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,159,290 |
|
|
|
4,762,499 |
|
Expenditures on intangible assets |
|
|
(5,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(242,632 |
) |
|
|
(43,544 |
) |
Cash paid towards contingent consideration |
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,093 |
) |
|
|
(206,895 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisition of business |
|
|
(66,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,089,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
for acquisition of equity accounted investee, net of cash acquired of Rs.385,714 |
|
|
(8,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372,088 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,596 |
|
|
|
476,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
U.S.$ |
(56,480 |
) |
|
Rs. |
|
Rs. |
(2,623,508 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(3,008,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from/(used in) financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(11,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(518,845 |
) |
|
|
(532,260 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,833 |
|
|
|
9,950 |
|
Proceeds/(repayments) of short term loans and borrowings, net |
|
|
30,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,434,914 |
|
|
|
(1,232,797 |
) |
Repayment of long-term loans and borrowings, net |
|
|
(20,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(957,882 |
) |
|
|
(6,021,692 |
) |
Dividend paid |
|
|
(15,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738,444 |
) |
|
|
(737,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from/(used in) financing activities |
|
U.S.$ |
(16,694 |
) |
|
Rs. |
|
Rs. |
(775,424 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(8,514,086 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(77,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,599,406 |
) |
|
|
(9,222,688 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
5,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,107 |
|
|
|
(825,796 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
150,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,986,513 |
|
|
|
18,061,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
U.S.$ |
78,282 |
|
|
Rs. |
|
Rs. |
3,636,214 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,013,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements.
8
1. Reporting Entity
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited (DRL or the parent company) together with its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) is a leading India-based pharmaceutical company
headquartered in Hyderabad, India. The Companys principal areas of operation are in
pharmaceutical services and active ingredients, global generics, and proprietary products.
The Companys principal research and development facilities are located in Andhra Pradesh,
India and in the United States; its principal manufacturing facilities are located in Andhra
Pradesh, India, Himachal Pradesh, India and Cuernavaca-Cuautla, Mexico; and its principal
marketing facilities are located in India, Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom,
Brazil and Germany. The Companys shares trade on the Bombay Stock Exchange and the
National Stock Exchange in India and, since April 11, 2001, also on the New York Stock
Exchange in the United States. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements were authorized for issuance by the Companys Board of Directors on March 4,
2009.
2. Basis of preparation of financial statements
a. Statement of compliance
These
condensed consolidated interim financial statements as at and for the
three and six months ended
September 30, 2008 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and its interpretations issued
by IASB. These condensed consolidated interim financial statements form part of the period
covered by the first IFRS annual financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2009 and
IFRS 1, First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards has been
applied. These condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all the
information required for full annual consolidated financial statements and are prepared in
accordance with IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting.
An explanation of how the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial position
and financial performance of the Company is provided in Note 4. This Note includes
reconciliations of equity and profit or loss for comparative periods under U.S. GAAP
(sometimes referred to herein as Previous GAAP) to those reported for those periods under
IFRS.
b. Basis of preparation
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the basis of
relevant IFRS that are effective or available for early adoption at the Companys first IFRS
annual reporting date, March 31, 2009. Based on these IFRS, the Board of Directors has made
assumptions about the accounting policies expected to be adopted (accounting policies)
when the first IFRS annual financial statements are prepared for the year-ending March 31,
2009.
The IFRS that will be effective or available for voluntary early adoption in the annual
financial statements for the period ending March 31, 2009 are still subject to change and to
the issue of additional interpretation(s) and therefore cannot be determined with certainty.
Accordingly, the accounting policies for such annual period that are relevant to this
interim financial information will be determined only when the first IFRS financial
statements are prepared at March 31, 2009.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated interim financial statements in accordance
with IAS 34 resulted in changes to the accounting policies as compared with the most recent
annual financial statements prepared under Previous GAAP. The accounting policies set out
below have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these condensed
consolidated interim financial statements. They also have been applied in preparing an
opening IFRS balance sheet at April 1, 2007 for the purposes of the transition to IFRS, as
required by IFRS 1. The impact of the transition from Previous GAAP to IFRS is explained in
Note 4.
c. Basis of measurement/accounting convention
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the
historical cost basis and on an accrual basis, except for the following:
|
|
|
derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value; and |
|
|
|
|
available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value. |
9
2. Basis of preparation of financial statements (continued)
d. Functional and presentation currency
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are presented in Indian rupees,
which is the functional currency of DRL. Functional currency of an entity is the currency of
the primary economic environment in which the entity operates.
In respect of all non-Indian subsidiaries that operate as marketing arms of the parent
company in their respective countries/regions, the functional currency has been determined
to be the functional currency of the parent company, i.e., the Indian rupee. Accordingly,
the operations of these entities are largely restricted to import of finished goods from the
parent company in India, sale of these products in the foreign country and remittance of the
sale proceeds to the parent company. The cash flows realized from sale of goods are readily
available for remittance to the parent company and cash is remitted to the parent company on
a regular basis. The costs incurred by these entities are primarily the cost of goods
imported from the parent company. The financing of these subsidiaries is done directly or
indirectly by the parent company.
In respect of subsidiaries whose operations are self contained and integrated within their
respective countries/regions, the functional currency has been determined to be the local
currency of those countries/regions. The assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries are
translated into Indian rupees at the rate of exchange prevailing as at the reporting date.
Revenues and expenses are translated into Indian rupees at average exchange rates prevailing
during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are included in foreign currency
translation reserve.
All financial information presented in Indian Rupees has been rounded to the nearest
thousand.
e. Convenience translation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been
prepared in Indian rupees. Solely for the convenience of the reader, the unaudited
condensed consolidated interim financial statements as of and for the
six months ended September 30, 2008 have been
translated into United States dollars at the noon buying rate in New York City on September
30, 2008 for cable transfers in Indian rupees, as certified for customs purposes by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York of U.S.$1.00 = Rs.46.45. No representation is made that the
Indian rupee amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at
such a rate or any other rate.
f. Use of estimates and judgments
The preparation of condensed consolidated interim financial statements in conformity with
IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the
application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income
and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to
accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in
any future periods affected. In particular, information about significant areas of
estimation uncertainty and critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the
most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements is included in
the following Notes:
|
|
|
Note 3(b) Assessment of functional currency for foreign operations |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(c) and 7 Financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(h) Measurement of recoverable amounts of cash-generating units |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(j) Provisions |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(k) Sales returns, rebates and chargeback provisions |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(m) Determination of annual effective tax rate
in interim periods and
recoverability of deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Business combinations |
|
|
|
|
Note 21 Contingencies |
10
3. Significant accounting policies
a. Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the
power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits
from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that currently are
exercisable are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in
the condensed consolidated interim financial statements from the date that control commences
until the date that control ceases. The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been
changed when necessary to align them with the policies adopted by the Company.
Special purpose entities
The Company has established certain special purpose entities (SPEs) for business purposes.
The Company does not have any direct or indirect shareholdings in these entities. A SPE is
consolidated if, based on an evaluation of the substance of its relationship with the
Company and the SPEs risks and rewards, the Company concludes that it controls the SPE.
SPEs controlled by the Company were established under terms that impose strict limitations
on the decision-making powers of the SPEs management and that result in the Company
receiving the majority of the benefits related to the SPEs operations and net assets, being
exposed to risks incident to the SPEs activities, and retaining the majority of the
residual or ownership risks related to the SPE or its assets.
Associates and jointly controlled entities (equity accounted investees)
Associates are those entities in which the Company has significant influence, but not
control, over the financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to
exist when the Company holds between 20 and 50 percent of the voting power of another
entity. Joint ventures are those entities over whose activities the Company has joint
control, established by contractual agreement and requiring unanimous consent for strategic
financial and operating decisions. Associates and jointly controlled entities are accounted
for using the equity method (equity accounted investees) and are initially recognized at
cost. The condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the Companys share of
the income and expenses and equity movements of equity accounted investees, after
adjustments to align the accounting policies with those of the Company, from the date that
significant influence or joint control commences until the date that significant influence
or joint control ceases. When the Companys share of losses exceeds its interest in an
equity accounted investee, the carrying amount of that interest (including any long term
investments) is reduced to zero and the recognition of further losses is discontinued except
to the extent that the Company has an obligation or has made payments on behalf of the
investee.
The Company does not consolidate entities where the minority shareholders have certain
significant participating rights that provide for effective involvement in significant
decisions in the ordinary course of business of such entities. Investments in such entities
are accounted by the equity method of accounting.
Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses arising from
intra-group transactions, are eliminated in preparing the condensed consolidated interim
financial statements. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with equity accounted
investees are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Companys interest in
the investee. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but
only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
11
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
b. Foreign currency
Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of
group entities at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the
functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. The foreign currency gain or loss on
monetary items is the difference between amortized cost in the functional currency at the
beginning of the period, adjusted for effective interest and payments during the period, and
the amortized cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the
period. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are
measured at fair value are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at
the date that the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences arising upon
retranslation are recognized in profit or loss, except for differences arising on qualifying
cash flow hedges, which are recognized directly in equity.
Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value
adjustments arising upon acquisition, are translated to reporting currency at exchange rates
at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated to
reporting currency at average rates prevailing during the year.
Foreign currency differences are recognized directly in equity. Such differences have been
recognized in the foreign currency translation reserve (FCTR). When a foreign operation is
disposed of, in part or in full, the relevant amount in the FCTR is transferred to profit or
loss.
Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from a monetary item receivable from or payable to
a foreign operation, the settlement of which is neither planned nor likely in the
foreseeable future, are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign operation
and are recognized directly in equity in the FCTR.
c. Financial instruments
Non-derivative financial instruments
Non-derivative financial instruments is comprised of investments in equity and debt
securities, trade receivables, certain other assets, cash and cash equivalents, loans and
borrowings, trade payables and certain other liabilities.
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value plus, for
instruments not at fair value through profit or loss, any directly attributable transaction
costs. Subsequent to initial recognition non-derivative financial instruments are measured
as described below.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash balances, current and time deposits with
banks. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the
Companys cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the
purpose of the statement of cash flows.
Held-to-maturity investments
If the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold debt securities to maturity, then
they are classified as held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity investments are measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Available-for-sale financial assets
The Companys investments in equity securities and certain debt securities are classified as
available-for-sale financial assets. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at
fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and
losses on available-for-sale monetary items are recognized directly in equity. When an
investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in equity is transferred to profit
or loss.
12
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
c. Financial instruments (continued)
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
An instrument is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading
or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial instruments are designated at
fair value through profit or loss if the Company manages such investments and makes purchase
and sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Companys documented
risk management or investment strategy. Upon initial recognition attributable transaction
costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Financial instruments at fair value
through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in
profit or loss.
Other
Other non-derivative financial instruments are measured at amortized cost using the
effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Derivative financial instruments
The Company
holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its foreign currency
exposure.
Derivatives are recognized initially at fair value; attributable transaction costs are
recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives
are measured at fair value, and changes therein are accounted for as described below.
Cash flow hedges
Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow
hedge are recognized directly in equity to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the
extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognized in profit or
loss. If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires
or is sold, terminated or exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively.
The cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in equity remains there until the forecast
transaction occurs. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recognized in
equity is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is recognized. In other
cases the amount recognized in equity is transferred to profit or loss in the same period
that the hedged item affects profit or loss.
Economic hedges
Hedge accounting is not applied to derivative instruments that economically hedge monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in the fair value of such
derivatives are recognized in profit or loss as part of foreign currency gains and losses.
Share capital
Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the
issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of
any tax effects.
d. Property, plant and equipment
Recognition and measurement
Items of property, plant and equipment including assets acquired under a finance lease are
measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost
includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The
cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labor, any other
costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working condition for its intended
use, and the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which
they are located. Purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related
equipment is capitalized as part of that equipment. Borrowing costs that are directly
attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are
capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.
When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are
accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.
13
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
d. Property, plant and equipment (continued)
Gains and losses upon disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by
comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and
equipment and are recognized net within other income/expense, net in profit or loss.
Subsequent costs
The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized in the
carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied
within the part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying
amount of the replaced part is derecognized. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of
property, plant and equipment are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.
Depreciation
Depreciation is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment. Leased assets are
depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives unless it is
reasonably certain that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term. Land
is not depreciated.
The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Factory and administrative buildings
|
|
25 50 years |
|
|
|
|
|
- Ancillary structures
|
|
3 15 years |
|
|
|
|
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
3 15 years |
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
4 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
4 5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
3 5 years |
|
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date.
e. Intangible assets
Goodwill
Goodwill (negative goodwill) arises upon the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and
joint ventures.
Acquisitions prior to April 1, 2007
As part of its transition to IFRS, the Company elected to restate only those business
combinations that occurred on or after April 1, 2007. In respect of acquisitions prior to
April 1, 2007, goodwill represents the amount recognized under Previous GAAP.
Acquisitions on or after April 1, 2007
For acquisitions on or after April 1, 2007, goodwill represents the excess of the cost of
the acquisition over the Companys interest in the net fair value of the identifiable
assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree. When the excess is negative
(negative goodwill), it is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
Acquisitions of minority interests
Goodwill arising upon the acquisition of a minority interest in a subsidiary represents the
excess of the cost of the additional investment over the carrying amount of the net assets
acquired at the date of exchange.
14
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
e. Intangible assets (continued)
Subsequent measurement
Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. In respect of equity
accounted investees, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount of
the investment.
Research and development
Expenditures on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific
or technical knowledge and understanding, are recognized in profit or loss when incurred.
Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially
improved products and processes. Development expenditures are capitalized only if
development costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically and
commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and the Company intends to and
has sufficient resources to complete development and to use or sell the asset. The
expenditures capitalized include the cost of materials, direct labor and overhead costs that
are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended
use. Borrowing costs related to the development of qualifying assets
are capitalized as a part of the cost of that asset. Other development expenditures are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.
Internal product development expenditures are capitalized only if they meet the recognition
criteria as mentioned above. Where regulatory and other uncertainties are such that the
criteria are not met the expenditures are recognized in the Companys income statement. This
is almost invariably the case prior to approval of the drug by the relevant regulatory
authority. Where, however, the recognition criteria are met, intangible assets are
capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful economic lives from
product launch. Payments to in-license products and compounds from external third parties
for new research and development projects (in-process research and development), generally
taking the form of up-front payments and milestones, are capitalized and amortized,
generally on a straight-line basis, over their useful economic lives from product launch.
Intangible assets relating to products in development (both internally generated and
externally acquired), other intangible assets not available for use and intangible assets
having indefinite useful life are subject to impairment testing at each balance sheet date.
All other intangible assets are tested for impairment when there are indications that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Any impairment losses are recognized immediately in
the Companys income statement. Trademarks with indefinite useful lives are tested for
impairment annually.
Capitalized development expenditures are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and
accumulated impairment losses.
Advances paid for research and development activities are shown as other receivables in the
balance sheet until the time that actual cost is incurred for such research and development
activities. Such amounts are capitalized or recognized as an expense, as the case may be, as
the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.
Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Company, which have finite useful lives,
are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses.
Subsequent expenditures
Subsequent expenditures are capitalized only when they increase the future economic benefits
embodied in the specific asset to which they relate. All other expenditures, including
expenditures on internally generated goodwill and brands, are recognized in profit or loss
as incurred.
Amortization
Amortization is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of intangible assets, other than for goodwill, intangible assets not available
for use and intangible assets having indefinite life, from the date that they are available
for use. The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:
15
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
e. Intangible assets (continued)
|
|
|
Trademarks with finite useful life
|
|
3 10 years |
|
|
|
Product related intangibles
|
|
6 15 years |
|
|
|
Beneficial toll manufacturing contract
|
|
24 months |
|
|
|
Non-competition arrangements
|
|
1.5 10 years |
|
|
|
Marketing rights
|
|
3 16 years |
|
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
2 11 years |
|
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
5 15 years |
f. Leases
At the inception of a lease, the lease arrangement is classified as either a finance lease
or an operating lease, based on the substance of the lease arrangement.
Finance leases
A finance lease is recognized as an asset and a liability at the commencement of the lease,
at the lower of the fair value of the asset and the present value of the minimum lease
payments. Initial direct costs, if any, are also capitalized and subsequent to initial
recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable
to that asset. Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the
finance expense and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance expense is
allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate of
interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
Operating leases
Other leases are operating leases and the leased assets are not recognized on the Companys
balance sheet. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
g. Inventories
Inventories consist of raw materials, stores and spares, work in progress and finished goods
and are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of all categories
of inventories, except stores and spares, is based on the first-in, first-out principle.
Stores and spares is comprised of packing materials, engineering spares (such as machinery
spare parts) and consumables (such as lubricants, cotton waste and oils), which are used in
operating machines or consumed as indirect materials in the manufacturing process, where
cost is based on a weighted average method. Cost includes expenditures incurred in
acquiring the inventories, production or conversion costs and other costs incurred in
bringing them to their existing location and condition. In the case of finished goods and
work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of overheads based on normal operating
capacity. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of
business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
16
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
h. Impairment
Financial assets
A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any
objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if
objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the
estimated future cash flows of that asset.
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated
as the difference between its carrying amount, and the present value of the estimated future
cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. An impairment loss in respect
of an available-for-sale financial asset is calculated by reference to its fair value.
Individually significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis.
The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit
risk characteristics.
All impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss. Any cumulative loss in respect of an
available-for-sale financial asset recognized previously in equity is transferred to profit
or loss. An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an
event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized. For financial assets measured at
amortized cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the
reversal is recognized in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are
equity securities, the reversal is recognized directly in equity.
Non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Companys non-financial assets, other than inventories and
deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any
indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the assets recoverable amount
is estimated. For goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not
yet available for use, the recoverable amount is estimated each year at the same time.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in
use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future
cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects
current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group
of assets that generate cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent of the
cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the cash-generating unit). The goodwill
acquired in a business combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, is allocated to
cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating
unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or
loss. Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first
to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the
carrying amount of the other assets in the unit (or group of units) on a pro rata basis.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets,
impairment losses recognized in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any
indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed
if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An
impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the assets carrying amount does not
exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or
amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
i. Employee benefits
Defined contribution plan
A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays
fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation
to pay further amounts. Obligations for contributions to recognized provident funds and
approved superannuation schemes which are defined contribution plans
are recognized as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss when they are due.
17
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
i. Employee benefits (continued)
Prepaid contributions are recognized as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a
reduction in future payments is available.
Defined benefit plans
A defined benefit plan is a post-employment benefit plan other than a defined contribution
plan. The Companys net obligation in respect of an approved gratuity plan, which is a
defined benefit plan and certain other defined benefit plans is calculated separately for
each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return
for their service in the current and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to determine
its present value. Any unrecognized past service costs and the fair value of any plan assets
are deducted. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on risk free government
bonds that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Companys obligations and that
are denominated in the same currency in which the benefits are expected to be paid. The
calculation is performed annually by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit
method. When the calculation results in a benefit to the Company, the recognized asset is
limited to the net total of any unrecognized past service costs and the present value of any
future refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
When the benefits of a plan are improved, the portion of the increased benefit relating to
past service by employees is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the
average period until the benefits become vested. To the extent that the benefits vest
immediately, the expense is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
The Company recognizes actuarial gains and losses using the corridor method. Under this
method, to the extent that any cumulative unrecognized actuarial gain or loss exceeds 10% of
the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of
plan assets, that portion is recognized in income over the expected average remaining
working lives of the employees participating in the plan. Otherwise, the actuarial gain or
loss is not recognized.
Termination benefits
Termination benefits are recognized as an expense when the Company is demonstrably
committed, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to either
terminate employment before the normal retirement date, or to provide termination benefits
as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Termination benefits for
voluntary redundancies are recognized as an expense if the Company has made an offer
encouraging voluntary redundancy, it is probable that the offer will be accepted, and the
number of acceptances can be estimated reliably.
Short-term benefits
Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are
expensed as the related service is provided.
A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus or
profit-sharing plans if the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay
this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be
estimated reliably.
Compensated leave of absence
Eligible employees are entitled to accumulate compensated absences up to prescribed limits
in accordance with the Companys policy and receive cash in lieu thereof. The Company
measures the expected cost of accumulating compensated absences as the additional amount
that the Company entities expect to pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has
accumulated at the balance sheet date. Such measurement is based on actuarial valuation as
at the balance sheet date carried out by a qualified actuary.
Share-based payment transactions
The grant date fair value of options granted to employees, calculated using the
Black-Scholes model, is recognized as an employee expense, with a corresponding increase in
equity, over the period that the employees become
18
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
i. Employee benefits (continued)
unconditionally entitled to the options. The increase in equity recognized in connection
with a share based payment transaction is presented as a separate component in equity. The
amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options
that vest.
j. Provisions
A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, the Company has a present legal
or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an
outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect of the
time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected
future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time
value of money and the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the
increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost.
Restructuring
A provision for restructuring is recognized when the Company has approved a detailed and
formal restructuring plan, and the restructuring either has commenced or has been announced
publicly. Future operating costs are not provided for.
Onerous contracts
A provision for onerous contracts is recognized when the expected benefits to be derived by
the Company from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations
under the contract. The provision is measured at the present value of the lower of the
expected cost of terminating the contract and the expected net cost of continuing with the
contract. Before a provision is established, the Company recognizes any impairment loss on
the assets associated with that contract.
k. Revenue
Sale of goods
Revenue is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been
transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs
and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, there is no continuing management
involvement with the goods and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably. Revenue from
the sale of goods includes excise duty and is measured at the fair value of the
consideration received or receivable, net of returns, sales tax and applicable trade
discounts and allowances.
Revenue from domestic sales of generic products is recognized upon delivery of products to
stockists by clearing and forwarding agents of the Company. Revenue from domestic sales of
active pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates is recognized on delivery of products to
customers, from the factories of the Company. Revenue from export sales is recognized when
the significant risks and rewards of ownership of products are transferred to the customers,
which is based upon the terms of the applicable contract.
Sales of generics in India are made through clearing and forwarding agents to stockists.
Significant risks and rewards in respect of ownership of generic products are transferred by
the Company when the goods are delivered to stockists from clearing and forwarding agents.
Clearing and forwarding agents are generally compensated on a commission basis as a
percentage of sales made by them.
Sales of active pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates in India are made directly to
the end customers generally, formulation manufacturers, from the factories of the Company.
Significant risks and rewards in respect of ownership of active pharmaceuticals ingredients
are transferred by the company on delivery of the products to the customers. Sales of active
pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates outside India are made directly to the end
customers, generally stockists or formulations manufacturers, from the parent company or its
consolidated subsidiaries.
19
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
k. Revenue (continued)
The Company has entered into marketing arrangements with certain marketing partners for sale
of goods in certain overseas territories. Under such arrangements, the Company sells generic
products to the marketing partners at a price agreed in the arrangement. Revenue is
recognized on these transactions upon delivery of products to the marketing partners. An
additional amount, representing profit share, is recognized as revenue, on the basis of
ultimate net sale proceeds, only when realization is certain.
Provisions for chargeback, rebates, discounts and medicaid payments are estimated and
provided for in the year of sales and recorded as reduction of revenue. A chargeback claim
is a claim made by the wholesaler for the difference between the price at which the product
is initially invoiced to the wholesaler and the net price at which it is agreed to be
procured from the Company. Provision for such chargebacks are accrued and estimated based on
historical average chargeback rate actually claimed over a period of time, current contract
prices with wholesalers/other customers and average inventory holding by the wholesaler.
Such provisions are disclosed as a reduction of trade receivable.
During the three months period ended September 30, 2008, the Company adjusted its estimate for chargeback and rebate accrual based on certain additional information regarding customer buying patterns and other market developments which resulted in a credit of U.S.$10.7 million being recorded as revenues for the three months period ended September 30, 2008.
The Company accounts for sales returns by recording an accrual based on the Companys
estimate of expected sales returns. The Company deals in various products and operates in
various markets. Accordingly, the Companys estimate of sales returns is determined
primarily by its experience in these markets. In respect of established products, the
Company determines an estimate of sales returns accrual primarily based on historical
experience of such sales returns. Additionally, other factors that the Company considers in
determining the estimate include levels of inventory in the distribution channel, estimated
shelf life, product discontinuances, price changes of competitive products, and introduction
of competitive new products, to the extent each of these factors impact the Companys
business and markets. The Company considers all these factors and adjusts the sales return
accrual to reflect its actual experience. With respect to new products introduced by the
Company, those are either extensions of an existing line of product or in a general
therapeutic category where the Company has historical experience. The Companys new product
launches have historically been in therapeutic categories where established products exist
and are sold either by the Company or its competitors. The Company has not yet introduced
products in a new therapeutic category where the sales returns experience of such products
is not known. The amount of sales returns for the Companys newly launched products do not
significantly differ from sales returns experience of current products marketed by the
Company or its competitors (as the Company understands based on industry publications).
Accordingly, the Company does not expect sales returns for new products to be significantly
different from expected sales returns of current products. The Company evaluates sales
returns of all its products at the end of each reporting period and records necessary
adjustments, if any.
Services
Revenue from services rendered, which primarily relate to contract research, is recognized
in profit or loss in proportion to the stage of completion of the transaction at the
reporting date. The stage of completion is assessed by reference to cost incurred as a
percentage of total expected cost.
License fees
Non-refundable milestone payments are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations
as and when related services are rendered or agreed milestones are achieved in accordance
with the terms of the license agreement, and when the Company has no future obligations or
continuing involvement pursuant to such milestone payments. Non-refundable up-front license
fees are deferred and recognized when the milestones are earned, in proportion to the amount
of each milestone earned bears to the total milestone payments agreed in the license
agreement. Where the upfront license fees are a composite amount and cannot be attributed to
a specific molecule, they are amortized over the development period. The milestone payments
increase during the development period as the risk involved decreases. The agreed milestone
payments reflect the progress of the development of the molecule and may not be spread
evenly over the development period. Accordingly, the milestone payments are a fair
representation of the extent of progress made in the development of these underlying
molecules. In the event the development of a molecule is discontinued, the corresponding
amount of deferred revenue is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in the
period in which the project is terminated.
20
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
k. Revenue (continued)
The Company has entered into certain dossier sales, licensing arrangements and supply
arrangements that include certain performance obligations. Based on an evaluation of whether
or not these obligations are inconsequential or perfunctory, the Company defers the upfront
payments received under these arrangements. Such deferred revenue is recognized in the
consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the Company completes remaining
performance obligations.
Export entitlements
Export entitlements are recognized as income when the right to receive credit as per the
terms of the scheme is established in respect of the exports made and where there is no
significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate collection of the relevant export proceeds.
l. Finance income and expenses
Finance income is comprised of interest income on funds invested (including
available-for-sale financial assets), dividend income, gains on the disposal of
available-for-sale financial assets, changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair
value through profit or loss, and gains on hedging instruments that are recognized in profit
or loss. Interest income is recognized as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective
interest method. Dividend income is recognized in profit or loss on the date that the
Companys right to receive payment is established.
Finance expenses is comprised of interest expense on loans and borrowings, unwinding of the
discount on provisions, changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss, impairment losses recognized on financial assets, and losses on hedging
instruments that are recognized in profit or loss. All borrowing costs are recognized in
profit or loss using the effective interest method.
Foreign currency gains and losses are reported on a net basis.
m. Income tax
Income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is
recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized
directly in equity, in which case it is recognized in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates
enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in
respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet method, providing for temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for the
following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a
transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor
taxable profit, and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries and jointly
controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the
foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary
differences arising upon the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at
the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they
reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting
date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right
to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the
same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend
to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and
liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable
profits will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred
tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no
longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.
Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends are recognized at the
same time as the liability to pay the related dividend is recognized.
21
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
n. Earnings per share
The Company presents basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) data for its ordinary
shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to ordinary
shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by
adjusting the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders and the weighted average
number of ordinary shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary
shares, which is comprised of share options granted to employees.
o. New standards and interpretations not yet adopted
A number of new standards and interpretations, and amendments to standards and
interpretations, are not yet effective for the year ending March 31, 2009, and have not been
applied in preparing these condensed consolidated interim financial statements:
|
|
|
Revised IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements (2007) becomes mandatory for
the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 and
is not expected to have any material impact on the presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Revised IFRS 3, Business Combinations (2008) becomes mandatory for the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2011, and will be
applied prospectively |
|
|
|
|
Amended IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (2008) becomes
mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ending March
31, 2011, and will be applied prospectively |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IFRS 2, Share-based Payment Vesting Conditions and Cancellations
becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year
ending March 31, 2010, with retrospective application. The Company is currently in the
process of evaluating the potential impact of the revised standard on its consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Amendments to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 1, Presentation
of Financial Statements Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on
Liquidation becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for
the year ending March 31, 2010 and retrospective application is permitted. The adoption
of this standard is not expected to have any material impact on the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Revised IAS 23, Borrowing Costs becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010. As the Company currently
follows a policy of capitalizing borrowing costs, this new standard will have no impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 13, Customer Loyalty Programmes becomes mandatory for the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 and is not
expected to have any impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 14, IAS 19 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding
Requirements and their Interaction becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 and is not expected to have any
material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IAS 39, Financial Instruments Recognition and Measurement becomes
mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ending March
31, 2010. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the potential impact of
the revised standard on its consolidated financial statements. |
22
3. Significant accounting policies (continued)
p. Standards early adopted
IFRS 8, Operating Segments introduces the management approach to segment reporting. IFRS
8 is mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ending March
31, 2010. IFRS 8 requires presentation and disclosure of segment information based on the
internal reports regularly reviewed by the Companys Chief Operating Decision Maker in order
to assess each segments performance and to allocate resources to them. The Company has
early adopted IFRS 8 and presented segment information in respect of its operating segments
in its unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements following management
approach based on the internal reports regularly reviewed by the Companys Chief Operating
Decision Maker.
4. Explanation of transition to IFRS
As stated in Note 2(a), these condensed consolidated interim financial statements form part
of the period covered by the first IFRS annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with IFRS. In preparing these financial statements, the Company has availed itself of
certain exemptions and exceptions in accordance with IFRS 1.
a. Exemptions from retrospective application
Following are the exemptions which the Company has opted to apply or not to apply:
|
i. |
|
Business combinations exemption: The Company has applied the exemption as
provided in IFRS 1 on non-application of IFRS 3, Business Combinations, to business
combinations consummated prior to April 1, 2007 (the Transition Date), pursuant to
which goodwill arising from business combination has been stated at the carrying amount
prior to the date of transition under Previous GAAP. The Company has also applied the
exemption for past business combinations to acquisitions of investments in associates
consummated prior to the Transition Date. |
|
|
ii. |
|
Fair value as deemed cost exemption: The Company has not elected to measure any
item of property, plant and equipment at its fair value at the Transition Date;
property, plant and equipment have been measured at cost in accordance with IFRS. |
|
|
iii. |
|
Employee benefits exemption: The Company has elected to apply the exemption as
provided in IFRS 1 and recognized cumulative actuarial gains and losses as of the
Transition Date as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings. The Company will
apply the corridor approach in subsequent periods. |
|
|
iv. |
|
Cumulative translation differences exemption: The Company had accumulated the
translation differences in a separate component of equity under Previous GAAP. Upon
transition to IFRS, the treatment of recording translation differences in equity did
not undergo any change and consequently the optional exemption of setting cumulative
differences as zero and reclassifying the amount recognized in accordance with Previous
GAAP as retained earnings as at the Transition Date was not required to be applied. |
|
|
v. |
|
Compound financial instruments: The Company did not have any compound financial
instrument as of the Transition Date. Consequently, upon adoption of IFRS the optional
exemption allowed of non-segregation of the liability component if such component was
no longer outstanding on the Transition Date is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
vi. |
|
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
exemption: All entities of the Company are transitioning to IFRS on the same date.
Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
vii. |
|
Share-based payment transaction exemption: Under Previous GAAP, the Company had
applied the fair value recognition and measurement principles similar
to those prescribed under IFRS 2
for all options granted before the Transition Date. Consequently, upon transition to
IFRS, the optional exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
viii. |
|
Fair value measurement of financial assets or liabilities at initial
recognition: The Company has not applied the amendment offered by the revision of IAS
39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, upon the initial recognition
of the financial instruments measured at fair value through the income statement where
there is no active market. |
23
4. Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued)
a. Exemptions from retrospective application (continued)
|
ix. |
|
Designation of financial assets and financial liabilities exemption: The Company
did not have any financial assets or liabilities as of the Transition Date which were
required to be designated and which met the required criteria given in IFRS 1 as a
financial asset or financial liability at fair value through profit or loss. |
|
|
x. |
|
Changes in decommissioning liabilities included in the cost of property, plant
and equipment exemption: The Company does not have any material decommissioning
liabilities in the cost of property, plant and equipment. Consequently, this exception
is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
xi. |
|
Leases exemption: The Company has no arrangements containing a lease as defined
under IFRIC 4, Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease. Consequently,
this exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
xii. |
|
Financial asset or an intangible asset accounted for in accordance with IFRIC
12, Service Concession Arrangements exemption: The Company has no arrangements which
would be classified as service concession arrangements as defined under IFRIC 12,
Service Concession Arrangements. Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to
the Company. |
|
|
xiii. |
|
Insurance contracts: The Company does not issue any insurance contracts.
Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
b. Exceptions from full retrospective application
|
i. |
|
Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities exception: Financial assets
and liabilities derecognized before January 1, 2004 are not re-recognized under IFRS.
No arrangements were identified that had to be assessed under this exception. |
|
|
ii. |
|
Hedge accounting exception: The Company has not identified any hedging
relationships existing as of the Transition Date. Consequently, this exception of not
reflecting in its opening IFRS statement of financial position a hedging relationship
of a type that does not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39 is not applicable to
the Company. |
|
|
iii. |
|
Estimates exception: Upon an assessment of the estimates made under Previous
GAAP, the Company has concluded that there was no necessity to revise such estimates
under IFRS except as a part of transition where estimates were required by IFRS and not
required by Previous GAAP or where estimates made under Previous GAAP were to be
revised to comply with IFRS, but such estimates reflected the conditions as at the
Transition Date. |
|
|
iv. |
|
Assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations: The Company has
not classified any asset as held for sale and therefore this exception is not
applicable. |
c. Reconciliation
The accounting policies as stated above have been applied in preparing the condensed
consolidated interim financial statements for the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, the
comparative information for the three and six months ended September 30, 2007, the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2008 and the preparation of an opening
IFRS balance sheet at April 1, 2007. In preparing its opening IFRS balance sheet,
comparative information for the three and six months ended September 30, 2007 and financial statements
for the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in
financial statements prepared in accordance with Previous GAAP.
An explanation of how the transition from Previous GAAP to IFRS has affected the Companys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows is set out in the following
tables and the Notes that accompany the tables.
24
4. Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued)
c. Reconciliation (continued)
i. Reconciliation of equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
April 1, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Total equity under Previous GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
41,578,228 |
|
|
Rs. |
45,358,784 |
|
|
Rs. |
47,066,584 |
|
Impairment impact on intangibles |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
621,311 |
|
|
|
621,311 |
|
|
|
99,315 |
|
Amortization reversal on intangibles impaired |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
26,472 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
(25,573 |
) |
|
|
(66,468 |
) |
|
|
16,413 |
|
Fringe benefit tax on employee stock options |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,823 |
) |
|
|
(52,946 |
) |
Tax adjustments |
|
|
E |
|
|
|
453,957 |
|
|
|
163,732 |
|
|
|
169,508 |
|
Foreign exchange rate impact on above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,773 |
|
|
|
25,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity under IFRS before reclassification of
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,627,923 |
|
|
|
46,026,545 |
|
|
|
47,350,814 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
F |
|
|
|
10,473 |
|
|
|
6,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity under IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
42,638,396 |
|
|
Rs. |
46,032,898 |
|
|
Rs. |
47,350,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii. Reconciliation of profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For three months ended |
|
For six months ended |
|
For the year ended |
|
|
Notes |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Profit under Previous GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
2,671,641 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,496,710 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,678,042 |
|
Impairment impact on intangibles |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(521,996 |
) |
Amortization reversed on intangibles impaired |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
26,472 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
(36,750 |
) |
|
|
(18,693 |
) |
Cash flow hedge related adjustments |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,490 |
) |
Fringe benefit tax on employee stock options |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(7,672 |
) |
|
|
(68,823 |
) |
|
|
(52,946 |
) |
Tax adjustments |
|
|
E |
|
|
|
(149,983 |
) |
|
|
(290,225 |
) |
|
|
(257,015 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
F |
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(4,120 |
) |
|
|
(10,473 |
) |
Foreign exchange rate impact on above
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
18,375 |
|
|
|
18,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit under IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
2,526,760 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,123,403 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,836,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii.
Notes to reconciliation
A. Impairment
Under Previous GAAP, impairment testing for an amortizable asset is a two step process.
First, it is tested for impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flow
projections with the carrying value of the asset. If upon comparison, the carrying value
exceeds the undiscounted cash flows then, under the second step, an impairment charge is
recognized for the difference between carrying amount of the asset and the fair value
thereof computed using a discounted cash flow approach. Under IFRS, there is only a one step
process, wherein impairment is tested and recognized if upon comparison, the carrying value
of the asset exceeds the discounted cash flows. The differential approach resulted in
additional impairment being recorded.
Furthermore, under Previous GAAP, a non-amortizable asset was tested for impairment at the
asset level, whereas under IFRS the impairment testing was done at a higher cash generating
unit level, as it did not generate identifiable cash inflows independent from other assets.
Impairment testing at such higher cash generating unit level under IFRS did not indicate any
impairment and accordingly, there was a reversal of impairment charge with respect to such
non-amortizable assets.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in an increase in equity under IFRS by Rs.621,311,
Rs.621,311 and Rs.99,315 as of April 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008
respectively, and an additional impairment and a decrease in profit under IFRS by Rs.521,996
for the year ended March 31, 2008.
Furthermore, the consequential amortization impact of subsequent periods has been reversed.
The impact of reversal of amortization resulted in an increase in equity under IFRS by
Rs.8,236 and Rs.26,472 as of September 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008, respectively, and an
increase in profit by Rs.4,166, Rs.8,236 and Rs.26,472 for the three months ended September
30, 2007, the six months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2008,
respectively.
25
4. Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued)
c. Reconciliation (continued)
B. Employee benefits
Under Previous GAAP, in determining the liability in respect of employment benefits, the
Company used discounting rates which were based on high-quality fixed-income investments
prevalent at the reporting date. Under IFRS, the Company is required to use high quality
corporate bond rates or, in the absence of a deep market for such bonds, the government bond
rate is required to be used. The Company has used the government bond rates for actuarially
valuing its defined benefit obligations, which resulted in an increase in the liability and
consequently, the net period benefit cost in each of the reporting periods.
Furthermore, until April 1, 2007, the Company used the corridor approach to record
actuarial gains and losses under Previous GAAP. Upon adoption of IFRS, the Company elected
to recognize all cumulative actuarial gains and losses in respect of defined benefit plans
at April 1, 2007 (the date of transition) as an adjustment to opening retained earnings and
has set the corridor to zero. Also, under Previous GAAP, the Company had recorded
actuarial gains and losses as part of equity, which is not required under IFRS, thereby
resulting in a reduced liability in the books with a corresponding positive impact on
equity.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease in equity under IFRS by Rs.25,573 and
Rs.66,468 as of April 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively, and an increase in
equity under IFRS by Rs.16,413 as of March 31, 2008. Consequently, it also resulted in an
increase of profit under IFRS by Rs.5,662 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, and
a decrease of profit under IFRS by Rs.36,750 and Rs.18,693 for the six months ended
September 30, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2008, respectively.
C. Hedge accounting
Under Previous GAAP, for certain hedge relationships where the hedging instrument is an
option, a terminal value approach to the assessment of effectiveness and measurement of
ineffectiveness was adopted as permitted by Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) Issue
G20. Under IFRS, in the absence of any specific guidance that permits entities to adopt a
terminal value approach for such relationships, hedge effectiveness is measured on the basis
of intrinsic value and time value changes are excluded from these qualifying hedge
relationships. Accordingly, for certain hedging relationships which were accounted as a cash
flow hedge under Previous GAAP, the requirement of hedge accounting for the risk previously
designated as the hedged risk are no longer met. Accordingly, under IFRS the fair value
changes on certain options contracts are recognized in the income statement as compared to
being recognized in equity under Previous GAAP.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease of profit under IFRS by Rs.25,490 for
the year ended March 31, 2008.
D. Fringe benefit tax on employee share based payments
Indian tax regulations require the Company to pay a Fringe Benefit Tax upon the exercise of
employee stock options. Under Previous GAAP, Fringe Benefit Tax is accrued upon exercise of
stock options. Under IFRS such Fringe Benefit Tax, if not recovered from employees, is
accrued over the vesting period of the stock options. In the event, the Company decides to
recover the related Fringe Benefit Tax from the employees exercising such options, a
reimbursement asset is recognized in the same period which offsets the accrual for Fringe
Benefit Tax.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease in equity under IFRS by Rs.68,822 and
Rs.52,946 as of September 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008, respectively, and a decrease of
profit under IFRS by Rs.7,672, Rs.68,822 and Rs.52,946 for the three months ended September
30, 2007, the six months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2008,
respectively.
E. Tax adjustments
Intra-group transactions are eliminated upon consolidation. Under Previous GAAP, income
taxes paid by the seller on intra-group profits in respect of assets that remain within the
consolidated group, including the tax effect of any reversing temporary differences in the
sellers tax jurisdiction, are deferred. The amount is recognized in other assets or
liabilities in the balance sheet until such time as the asset leaves the consolidated group,
at which point the amount
26
4. Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued)
|
c. |
|
Reconciliation (continued) |
|
|
|
|
is reclassified to income tax expense. Under IFRS, any related deferred tax effects are
measured based upon the tax rate of the purchaser. However, the tax effects are not
eliminated unless the transacting entities are subject to the same tax rate. |
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, the income tax expense recognized in each interim period under Previous GAAP is
based on the best estimate of the weighted average effective income tax rate expected for
the annual reporting period applied to the pre-tax income of the interim period. Under
Previous GAAP, a consolidated Annual Effective Tax Rate is arrived at based upon projected
tax expense and profit before taxes for each of the tax jurisdictions and then such
consolidated Annual Effective Tax Rate is applied to consolidated profits for the quarter.
Under IFRS, if different income tax rates apply to different tax jurisdictions, income tax
expense is computed by applying the projected Annual Effective Tax Rate for each of the
jurisdictions on the pre-tax income of the interim period for each of such jurisdictions
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
The above differences in IFRS as compared to Previous GAAP, along with the tax impact of the
adjustments as discussed above, have resulted in an increase in equity by Rs.453,957,
Rs.163,732 and Rs.169,508 as of April 1, 2007, September 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008,
respectively, and a decrease in profit by Rs.149,983, Rs.290,225 and Rs.257,015 for the
three months ended September 30, 2007, the six months ended September 30, 2007 and the year
ended March 31, 2008, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
F. Change in presentation of minority interest |
|
|
|
|
Under IFRS, minority interest is reported as a separate item within equity. Previous GAAP
requires minority interest to be presented separately from equity. Under IFRS, the
minoritys share of net income is presented as an allocation of net income, whereas, under
Previous GAAP, the minoritys share of net income is considered in determining net income. |
|
|
|
|
The aforesaid differences have resulted in an increase of equity under IFRS by Rs.10,473 and
Rs.6,353 as of April 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007, respectively, and a decrease of profit
under IFRS by Rs.1,097, Rs.4,120 and Rs.10,473 for the three months ended September 30,
2007, the six months ended September 30, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2008,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
iv. Explanation of material adjustments to the cash flow statement |
|
|
|
|
Unlike Previous GAAP, under IFRS while bank overdrafts are disclosed as part of borrowings
in the balance sheet, the same are reduced from cash and cash equivalents in preparation of
the cash flows if they are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Companys
cash management. There were bank overdrafts of Rs.526,030 as at April 1, 2007, Rs.452,066
as at September 30, 2007 and Rs.434,928 as at March 31, 2008 that were repayable on demand,
and which formed an integral part of the Companys cash management and were not considered as a
reduction in cash and cash equivalents. Accordingly the movement in such balances was
classified as financing cash flows under Previous GAAP. These have now been reclassified
under cash and cash equivalents under IFRS for the preparation of cash flow statements. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, restricted cash of Rs.606,159 as at April 1, 2007, Rs.19,972 as at September
30, 2007 and Rs.23,156 as at March 31, 2008 was not considered as cash and cash equivalents
for the preparation of cash flow statements. Accordingly, movement in such balances was
classified as investing cash flows under Previous GAAP. These have now been reclassified as
cash and cash equivalents under IFRS. |
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, interest paid of Rs.532,260 and interest received of Rs.476,757 for the six
months ended September 30, 2007 was classified as operating cash flows under Previous GAAP
and has been reclassified as financing and investing cash flows, respectively, under IFRS.
There were no other material differences between the cash flow statement presented under
IFRS and the cash flow statement presented under Previous GAAP. |
27
5. Segment reporting
The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates the Companys performance and
allocates resources based on an analysis of various performance indicators by operating
segments. The operating segments reviewed by the CODM are as follows:
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients (PSAI); |
|
|
|
|
Global Generics; and |
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products |
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients. This segment includes active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediaries, also known as active pharmaceutical products or bulk drugs,
which are the principal ingredients for finished pharmaceutical products. Active
pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediaries become finished pharmaceutical products when
the dosages are fixed in a form ready for human consumption such as a tablet, capsule or
liquid using additional inactive ingredients. This segment also includes contract research
services and the manufacture and sale of active pharmaceutical ingredients and steroids in
accordance with the specific customer requirements. Thus this segment
was formed by aggregating our former Active pharmaceutical ingredients
and intermediates segment and Custom pharmaceutical services segment.
Global Generics. This segment consists of finished pharmaceutical products ready for
consumption by the patient, marketed under a brand name (branded formulations) or as generic
finished dosages with therapeutic equivalence to branded formulations (generics). The
Company is transitioning to a new organization structure for this segment. While the
resource allocation is done by the CODM at the global generics level, certain additional
information (revenue and gross profit) with respect to the Companys formulations and
generics business continues to be reviewed by the CODM. Accordingly, such further detailed
information has also been included in this segments disclosure.
Proprietary Products. This segment involves the discovery of new chemical entities for
subsequent commercialization and out-licensing. It also involves the Companys specialty
pharmaceuticals business which is positioning to launch sales and marketing operations for
in-licensed and co-developed dermatology products.
The CODM reviews gross profit as the performance indicator for all three of the above
segments. The Company does not review the total assets and liabilities for each segment. The
property, plant and equipment used in the Companys business, and the related depreciation
and amortization expenses, are not fully identifiable with or allocable to individual
reportable segments, as certain assets are used interchangeably between segments. The other
assets are not specifically allocable to the segments. Consequently, management believes
that it is not practicable to provide segment disclosures relating to total assets and
liabilities since allocation among the various segments is not possible.
28
5. Segment reporting (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about segments: |
|
For the six months ended September 30, |
|
Segments |
|
PSAI |
|
|
Global Generics* |
|
|
Proprietary Products |
|
|
Others |
|
Total |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Segment revenue (Note 1) |
|
Rs. |
9,441,034 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,034,613 |
|
|
Rs. |
21,398,999 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,175,874 |
|
|
Rs. |
86,668 |
|
|
Rs. |
101,693 |
|
|
Rs. |
262,072 |
|
|
Rs. |
122,090 |
|
|
Rs. |
31,188,773 |
|
|
Rs. |
24,434,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
Rs. |
2,921,017 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,824,269 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,388,172 |
|
|
Rs. |
9,538,686 |
|
|
Rs. |
57,518 |
|
|
Rs. |
53,806 |
|
|
Rs. |
91,156 |
|
|
Rs. |
(66,372 |
) |
|
Rs. |
15,457,863 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,350,389 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,371,162 |
|
|
|
7,998,889 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874,764 |
|
|
|
1,615,846 |
|
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,616 |
|
|
|
(151,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,883,321 |
|
|
|
2,887,043 |
|
Finance income/(expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(405,307 |
) |
|
|
460,177 |
|
Share of profit/(loss) of equity
accounted investees, net of
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480,067 |
|
|
|
3,346,617 |
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(316,144 |
) |
|
|
776,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
2,163,923 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,123,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1: Segment revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2008 does not include inter-segment revenues from PSAI to Global Generics which is accounted for at a cost of Rs.1,250,345 (as compared to
Rs.1,196,760 for the six months ended September 30, 2007) and inter-segment revenues from Global Generics to PSAI which is accounted for at a cost of Rs.4,437 (as compared to Rs.21,905 for the six months ended
September 30, 2007).
*Global Generics consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments |
|
Formulations |
|
|
Generics |
|
|
Global generics |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Segment revenue (Note 2) |
|
Rs. |
9,122,077 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,866,670 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,276,922 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,309,204 |
|
|
Rs. |
21,398,999 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,175,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
Rs. |
6,718,773 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,688,599 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,669,399 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,850,087 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,388,172 |
|
|
Rs. |
9,538,686 |
|
Note 2: Segment revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2008 does not include inter-segment revenues from Formulations to PSAI which
is accounted for at a cost of Rs.4,437 (as compared to Rs.21,905 for the six months ended September 30, 2007)
29
5. Segment reporting (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about segment |
|
For the three months ended September 30, |
|
Segments |
|
PSAI |
|
|
Global Generics** |
|
|
Proprietary Products |
|
|
Others |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Segment revenue (Note 3) |
|
Rs. |
4,827,748 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,400,295 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,112,060 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,947,678 |
|
|
Rs. |
48,185 |
|
|
Rs. |
49,239 |
|
|
Rs. |
162,977 |
|
|
Rs. |
54,001 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,150,970 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,451,213 |
|
Gross profit |
|
Rs. |
1,421,799 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,579,934 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,446,357 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,660,376 |
|
|
Rs. |
26,685 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,644 |
|
|
Rs. |
68,685 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,558 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,963,526 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,281,512 |
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,285,810 |
|
|
|
4,417,584 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
824,694 |
|
|
|
809,569 |
|
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,511 |
|
|
|
(68,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,765,511 |
|
|
|
1,123,067 |
|
Finance income/(expense), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(482,337 |
) |
|
|
301,766 |
|
Share of profit/(loss) of equity
accounted investees, net of
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,284,930 |
|
|
|
1,428,258 |
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232,298 |
) |
|
|
1,098,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
1,052,632 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,526,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3: Segment revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008 does not include inter-segment revenues from PSAI to Global Generics which is accounted for at a cost of Rs.665,795 (as compared to Rs.736,603 for the three months ended September 30, 2007) and
inter-segment revenues from Global Generics to PSAI which is accounted for at cost of Rs.0 (as compared to Rs.21,905 for the three months ended September 30, 2007).
**Global generics consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments |
|
Formulations |
|
|
Generics |
|
|
Global generics |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Segment revenue (Note 4) |
|
Rs. |
4,632,861 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,815,475 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,479,199 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,132,203 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,112,060 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,947,678 |
|
Gross profit |
|
Rs. |
3,424,652 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,782,545 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,021,705 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,877,831 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,446,357 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,660,376 |
|
Note 4: Segment revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008 does not include inter-segment revenues from formulations to PSAI which is accounted for at a cost of Rs.0 (as compared to Rs.21,905 for the three months ended September 30,
2007).
30
6. Business combinations and other acquisitions
a. Acquisition of a unit of The Dow Chemical Company
On April 28, 2008, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Dr. Reddys Laboratories
(EU) Limited (DRL EU), acquired a unit of The Dow Chemical Company associated with its
United Kingdom sites in Mirfield and Cambridge for a total cash consideration of
Rs.1,301,899 (U.S.$32,137). The acquisition includes customer contracts, associated
products, process technology, intellectual property, trademarks and the Dowpharma Small
Molecules facilities located in Mirfield and Cambridge, United Kingdom. The Company also
took over the existing work force as a part of the acquisition. The acquisition complements
technology and experience synergies to the Companys existing custom pharmaceutical business
and gives access to a research and development team.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with
IFRS No. 3, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the financial results of the aforesaid
acquired business for the period from April 29, 2008 through September 30, 2008 have been
included in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the
Company.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized values |
|
Particulars |
|
on acquisition |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
Rs. |
740,704 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
800,883 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
230,707 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
45,923 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
(115,565 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
(250,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net identifiable assets and liabilities |
|
Rs. |
1,452,302 |
|
Negative goodwill on acquisition recognized in profit
and loss account |
|
|
(150,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid in cash* |
|
Rs. |
1,301,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Total consideration paid includes direct attributable costs of Rs.12,537 (U.S.$309). |
As the acquisition involved a combination of a purchase of a unit of an existing entity and
purchase of certain identifiable assets, the carrying value of assets and liabilities before
acquisition could not be determined in accordance with IFRS.
The estimated useful lives of intangibles acquired are as follows:
|
|
|
Customer related intangibles
|
|
4-11 years |
Product related intangibles
|
|
6-13 years |
The negative goodwill on acquisition is attributable mainly to lower amounts paid towards
inventories and intangible assets in the acquired business. The acquired business
contributed revenues of Rs.297,894 and profit of Rs.39,976 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and revenue of Rs.455,425 and, including
negative goodwill, a profit of Rs.98,682 for the period from April 29, 2008 to September 30, 2008.
31
6. Business combinations and other acquisitions (continued)
b. Acquisition of BASF Corporations manufacturing facility in Shreveport, Louisiana,
U.S.A. and related pharmaceutical contract manufacturing business.
On April 30, 2008, the Company acquired BASF Corporations pharmaceutical contract
manufacturing business and its manufacturing facility in Shreveport, Louisiana, U.S.A. for a
total cash consideration of Rs.1,639,276 (U.S.$40,466). The business involves contract
manufacturing of generic prescription and over the counter products for branded and generic
companies in the United States. This acquired business includes customer contracts, related
ANDAs and NDAs, and trademarks, as well as the Shreveport manufacturing facility. The
Company also took over the existing work force as a part of the acquisition.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with
IFRS No. 3, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the financial results of the aforesaid
acquired business for the period from May 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008 have been
included in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the
Company.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized values on |
|
Particulars |
|
acquisition |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
Rs. |
755,607 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
482,068 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
248,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net identifiable assets and liabilities |
|
Rs. |
1,485,873 |
|
Goodwill on acquisition |
|
|
153,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, satisfied in cash* |
|
Rs. |
1,639,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Total consideration paid includes direct attributable costs of Rs.30,858 (U.S.$762). |
As the acquisition involved the purchase of a unit of an existing entity with certain
identifiable assets and liabilities, the carrying value of assets and liabilities before
acquisition could not be determined in accordance with IFRs.
The estimated useful lives of intangibles acquired are as follows:
|
|
|
Customer related intangibles
|
|
4-9 years |
Product related intangibles
|
|
9-10 years |
Goodwill amounts to Rs.153,403 and is attributable mainly to the employee workforce acquired
and the estimated values to be derived from the synergies for the Company due to cost
savings. The acquired business contributed revenues of Rs.428,006 and net loss of Rs.94,870
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and revenue of Rs.741,647 and net loss of
Rs.92,436 for the period from May 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008.
c. Acquisition of Jet Generici SRL
On April 30, 2008, the Company acquired Jet Generici Srl, a company engaged in the sale of
generic finished dosages in Italy for a total cash consideration of Rs.147,887 (Euro 2.34
million). The transaction was accounted as an acquisition of business under the purchase
method in accordance with IFRS 3. The transaction resulted in the Company gaining an entry
in the Italian market and resulted in goodwill of Rs.162,356.
32
6. Business combinations and other acquisitions (continued)
d. Proforma information
If the above acquisitions had taken effect at the beginning of the reporting period (i.e.,
April 1, 2007), on a pro-forma basis the revenue, profit before tax and profit after tax of
the Company for the applicable periods on a pro-forma basis would have been as below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Rs. |
31,333,279 |
|
|
Rs. |
25,808,340 |
|
Profit before tax |
|
|
2,412,082 |
|
|
|
3,534,500 |
|
Profit after tax |
|
|
2,125,594 |
|
|
|
4,261,306 |
|
|
e. Acquisition of entire equity holding of Perlecan Pharma Private Limited
In September 2005, the Company announced the formation of an integrated drug development company, Perlecan Pharma Private Limited
(Perlecan Pharma), as a joint venture with Citigroup Venture Capital International
Growth Partnership Mauritius Limited (Citigroup Venture) and ICICI Venture Funds
Management Company (ICICI Venture). Perlecan Pharma is engaged in the clinical
development and out-licensing of New Chemical Entity (NCE) assets. Under the terms
of the joint venture agreement, Citigroup Venture and ICICI Venture each committed to
contribute Rs.1,003,725 (U.S.$22,500) and the Company committed to contribute Rs.340,000
(U.S.$7,500) towards equity in Perlecan Pharma. The arrangement to form Perlecan Pharma was
effective from March 27, 2006 (before the date of transition to IFRS).
As of March 31, 2006, the Company owned approximately 14.28% of the equity of Perlecan Pharma.
In addition, Perlecan Pharma issued warrants to the Company to purchase 45 million equity shares
of Perlecan Pharma, at an exercise price of Rs.1.00 per equity share, the exercise of which was
contingent upon the success of certain research and development milestones achieved by Perlecan
Pharma. Upon full exercise of the warrants, the Company would own approximately 62.5% of the
equity of Perlecan Pharma. Furthermore, three out of seven directors on the Board of Directors
of Perlecan Pharma were designated by the Company. As per the terms of the joint venture agreement,
the Company had the first right to conduct product development and clinical trials on behalf of
Perlecan Pharma on an arms length basis subject to the final decision
by the Board of Directors
of Perlecan Pharma. Considering these factors, the Company has accounted for its investment in
Perlecan Pharma in accordance with IAS 28, Investments in
Associates.
As of March 31, 2006, the Company and the other two investors had invested Rs.100,800 (U.S.$2,259)
and Rs.604,900 (U.S.$13,559), respectively, in Perlecan Pharma. The Company was also committed
to invest an additional amount of Rs.239,200 (U.S.$5,241) as its proportionate equity contribution
in the future. As per the terms of the amended joint venture agreement, the Company was to be
reimbursed by Perlecan Pharma for research and development costs of Rs.231,023 that were incurred
by the Company prior to the effective date of the agreement. The reimbursement for research and
development costs incurred by the Company prior to the effective date of the agreement was reduced
from the carrying value of the equity investment in Perlecan Pharma as of March 31, 2006. Therefore,
the equity investment was carried at Rs.0 and the remaining balance of the Companys commitment to
make additional equity investments in Perlecan Pharma was Rs.170,223, recognized as other liability
as of March 31, 2006.
During the year ended
March 31, 2007, the Company and the other two investors invested additional amounts of Rs.69,200
and Rs.412,700, respectively, in Perlecan Pharma. As a result, as of
March 31, 2007, the Companys
ownership of Perlecan Pharma increased to approximately 14.31%. As of March 31, 2008, the carrying
value of the Companys investment in Perlecan Pharma was Rs.0, the other liability balance
was Rs.179,589
and the Company was committed to make additional equity investments of Rs.170,000. The Company continued
to reflect its equity in losses of Perlecan Pharma taking into account its future funding commitments.
On July 30, 2008, the Company acquired the entire equity holding of Citigroup Venture and ICICI
Venture in Perlecan Pharma for a total consideration of Rs.757,802. Consequently, Perlecan Pharma
has become a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. The Company has evaluated the acquisition
in accordance with IFRS 3, Business Combinations, and believes that the acquired set of assets
does not qualify to be a business and therefore has accounted for this as an asset acquisition.
Accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the following assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Particulars |
|
Recognized values on acquisition |
|
Current assets, net |
|
Rs. |
408,035 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
81,604 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
268,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid |
|
Rs. |
757,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the acquisition, other liability of Rs.179,589, representing the deferred credit at
the time of the initial joint venture arrangement, was recognized in the income statement as a
credit to research and development expenses in the three months and six months ended September 30, 2008.
33
7. Financial instruments
Hedging of fluctuations in foreign currency
The Company is exposed to exchange rate risk which arises from its foreign exchange
revenues, primarily in U.S. Dollars, British Pounds and Euros and foreign currency debt in
U.S. Dollars and Euros.
The Company uses forward exchange contracts and option contracts (derivatives) to mitigate
its risk of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Most of the forward exchange
contracts/option contracts have maturities of less than one year after the balance sheet
date. Where necessary, the forward exchange contracts are rolled over at maturity.
Forecasted transactions
The Company classifies its option contracts hedging forecasted transactions as cash flow
hedges and measures them at fair value. The fair value of option contracts used as hedges of
forecasted transactions at September 30, 2008 was a liability of Rs.913,892 (as compared to
a liability of Rs.10,064 at March 31, 2008), that were recognized as derivatives measured at
fair value.
Recognized assets and liabilities
Changes in the fair value of forward exchange contracts that economically hedge monetary
assets and liabilities in foreign currencies and for which no hedge accounting is applied
are recognized in profit or loss. Both the changes in fair value of the forward contracts
and the foreign exchange gains and losses relating to the monetary items are recognized as
part of net financing costs. The fair value of forward exchange contracts and option
contracts used as economic hedges of monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies
recognized in fair value derivatives was a liability of Rs.58,062 at September 30, 2008 (as
compared to a liability of Rs.85,982 at March 31, 2008).
Fair values
The carrying amount and fair value of financial instruments at September 30, 2008 is a net
liability of Rs.19,732,982 (as compared to a net liability of Rs.10,647,534 at March 31,
2008).
34
8. Income taxes
Current tax
Current tax expense for the interim periods is calculated based on the estimated average
annual income tax applied on the pre tax income of the interim period.
Current tax for current and prior periods is classified as current liability to the extent
that it is unpaid. Amounts paid in excess of amounts owed are classified as a current asset.
Deferred tax
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected movements of realization or
settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using the effective tax rate of
the interim periods presented.
The primary components of the Companys recognized deferred tax asset includes temporary
differences related to expenses deferred for the tax purposes, operating and capital losses
carried forward, provisions and minimum alternate tax carry forward. The primary components
of the Companys deferred tax liabilities include temporary differences related to property,
plant, equipment and intangible assets. Deferred tax expenses or benefits arise from the
origination and reversal of temporary differences, the effect of change in tax rates and the
benefit of tax losses recognized.
Current tax and deferred tax recognized in the Companys income statement are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Current tax expense |
|
Rs. |
599,030 |
|
|
Rs. |
130,192 |
|
|
Rs. |
190,095 |
|
|
Rs. |
102,940 |
|
Deferred tax expense/(benefit) |
|
|
(282,886 |
) |
|
|
(906,978 |
) |
|
|
42,203 |
|
|
|
(1,201,442 |
) |
|
|
|
Income tax expense/(benefit) |
|
Rs. |
316,144 |
|
|
Rs. |
(776,786 |
) |
|
Rs. |
232,298 |
|
|
Rs. |
(1,098,502 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deferred tax recognized directly in the equity was a benefit of Rs.148,666 for the six
months ended September 30, 2008 (as compared to an expense of Rs.18,087 for the six months
ended September 30, 2007).
Reconciliation of effective tax rate
The reported income tax expense for the six months ended September 30, 2008 was calculated
based on an estimated average annual income tax rate of 12.75%. For the six months ended
September 30, 2007, the reported income tax expense was calculated based on an estimated
average annual net income tax rate of negative 23.21%. The difference between the estimated
average annual effective income tax rate and the enacted tax rate is accounted for by a
number of factors, including the effects of changes in tax laws and rates, the effects of
differences between Indian and foreign tax rates, expenses not deductible for tax purposes,
income exempted from income taxes, and the effects of minimum alternate taxes. During the
three months ended September 30, 2007, pursuant to changes in German tax laws, the enacted
tax rated decreased by approximately 8%. This resulted in a reduction in the net deferred
tax liability balance of betapharm by Rs.1,458.8 million, which was recorded as a deferred
tax benefit in the Companys income statement during the three months and six months ended
September 30, 2007.
35
9. Property, plant and equipment
Acquisitions and disposals
During the six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company acquired assets with an
aggregate cost of Rs.4,179,076 (as compared to assets with a cost of Rs.6,231,125 for the
year ended March 31, 2008), including assets acquired through business combinations of
Rs.1,496,374 (no assets were acquired through business combinations for the year ended March
31, 2008). Assets with a net book value of Rs.11,054 were disposed of during
the six months ended September 30, 2008 (as compared to assets with a net book value of
Rs.62,661 for the year ended March 31, 2008), resulting in a gain on disposal of Rs.12,516
(as compared to a loss on disposal of Rs.7,629 for the year ended March 31, 2008).
Depreciation expenses for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2008 amounted
to Rs.525,655 and Rs.1,081,911, respectively (as compared to Rs.410,149 and Rs.803,303,
respectively, for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2007).
Capital Commitments
As of March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, the Company was committed to spend
approximately Rs.1,552,426 and Rs.1,463,833, respectively, under agreements to purchase
property, plant and equipment. This amount is net of capital advances paid in respect of
such purchases.
10. Goodwill
Goodwill arising upon acquisitions is not amortized but tested for impairment annually or
more frequently if there are certain internal or external indicators.
The following table presents the changes in goodwill during the six months ended September
30, 2008 and the year ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Opening balance (1) |
|
Rs. |
17,179,231 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,947,898 |
|
Goodwill arising on purchase business combination |
|
|
315,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,437 |
) |
Effect of translation adjustments |
|
|
982,814 |
|
|
|
1,321,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance (1) |
|
Rs. |
18,477,804 |
|
|
Rs. |
17,179,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes goodwill arising upon investment in affiliate of Rs.181,943. |
|
(2) |
|
The impairment of goodwill of Rs.90,437 relates to the Companys proprietary products
segment. |
11. Other intangible assets
Acquisitions and Write-down of intangibles
During the six months ended September, 30 2008, the Company acquired other intangible assets
with an aggregate cost of Rs.1,636,539 (as compared to assets with a cost of Rs.211,377 for
the year ended March 31, 2008), including assets acquired through business combinations of
Rs.1,312,303 (no assets were acquired through business combinations for the year ended March
31, 2008). Amortization expenses for the three months and six months ended September 30,
2008 was Rs.471,777 and Rs.848,411, respectively (as compared to amortization expense of
Rs.405,645 and Rs.752,283, respectively, for the three months and six months ended September
30, 2007).
36
During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company tested the carrying value of betapharm
related intangibles for impairment. This testing was triggered by certain adverse market
conditions, such as decreases in market prices and an increasing trend in certain new type
of rebates being negotiated with State Healthcare Insurance Fund (SHI) companies and
certain supply constraints. As a result of this review, the Company recorded a write-down of
intangible assets of Rs.2,883,005 and adjusted the net carrying value of certain product
related intangibles as of March 31, 2008.
Furthermore, during the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company also tested the carrying
value of Litaphar related intangibles for impairment. This testing was triggered by certain
adverse market conditions, such as decreases in sales and increases in costs of procurement.
The fair values of these intangibles were determined based on discounted cash flow approach.
As a result of this review, the Company recorded a write-down of intangible assets of
Rs.127,506 and adjusted the net carrying value of product related intangibles as of March
31, 2008.
12. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
Rs. |
5,085,138 |
|
|
Rs. |
.3,226,016 |
|
Packing material, stores and spares |
|
|
925,240 |
|
|
|
773,433 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
3,104,407 |
|
|
|
2,345,849 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
6,262,236 |
|
|
|
4,787,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
15,377,021 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,132,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months and six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company
recorded an inventory write-down of Rs.35,795, Rs.72,915, Rs.65,689 and Rs.163,299,
respectively, resulting from a decline in the net realizable value of certain finished goods and
write down of certain raw materials. These amounts are included in the cost of revenues.
13. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Cash balances |
|
Rs. |
160,446 |
|
|
Rs. |
162,771 |
|
Balances with banks |
|
|
4,960,000 |
|
|
|
7,258,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet |
|
|
5,120,446 |
|
|
|
7,421,441 |
|
Bank overdrafts used for cash management purposes |
|
|
(1,484,232 |
) |
|
|
(434,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents on the cash flow
statement |
|
Rs. |
3,636,214 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,986,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
14. |
|
Other expense/(income), net |
Other expense/(income), net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(12,516 |
) |
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
(9,669 |
) |
|
|
331 |
|
Sale of spent chemical |
|
|
(129,463 |
) |
|
|
(73,991 |
) |
|
|
(69,074 |
) |
|
|
(46,055 |
) |
Negative goodwill on acquisitions of business |
|
|
(150,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
(124,344 |
) |
|
|
(105,092 |
) |
|
|
(63,660 |
) |
|
|
(47,165 |
) |
Provision for expected claim from innovator (See Note 21) |
|
|
744,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
26,556 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
24,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
328,616 |
|
|
Rs. |
(151,389 |
) |
|
Rs. |
87,511 |
|
|
Rs. |
(68,708 |
) |
|
|
|
15. Finance income/(expense), net
Finance income, net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Interest income |
|
Rs. |
119,713 |
|
|
Rs. |
478,990 |
|
|
Rs. |
50,288 |
|
|
Rs. |
218,030 |
|
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) |
|
|
( 119,921 |
) |
|
|
558,670 |
|
|
|
(295,711 |
) |
|
|
259,305 |
|
Profit on sale of investments |
|
|
117,078 |
|
|
|
16,186 |
|
|
|
42,282 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(522,177 |
) |
|
|
(593,669 |
) |
|
|
(279,196 |
) |
|
|
(175,804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
(405,307 |
) |
|
Rs. |
460,177 |
|
|
Rs. |
(482,337 |
) |
|
Rs. |
301,766 |
|
|
|
|
16. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
The calculation of basic earnings per share for the six months period ended September 30,
2008 was based on the profit attributable to equity shareholders of Rs.2,163,923 (as
compared to a profit of Rs.4,127,523 for the six months ended September 30, 2007) and a
weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the six months ended September
30, 2008 and six months ended September 30, 2007 calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Issued equity shares as of April 1 |
|
|
168,172,746 |
|
|
|
167,912,180 |
|
Effect of shares issued on exercise of stock options |
|
|
102,049 |
|
|
|
98,320 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at September 30 |
|
|
168,274,795 |
|
|
|
168,010,500 |
|
|
38
16. Earnings per share (continued)
The calculation of basic earnings per share for the three months period ended September 30,
2008 was based on the profit attributable to equity shareholders of Rs.1,052,632 (as
compared to a profit of Rs.2,527,857 for the three months ended September 30, 2007) and a
weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the three months ended September
30, 2008 and three months ended September 30, 2007 calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Issued equity shares as of July 1 |
|
|
168,297,383 |
|
|
|
168,049,852 |
|
Effect of shares issued on exercise of stock options |
|
|
42,639 |
|
|
|
42,934 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at September 30 |
|
|
168,340,022 |
|
|
|
168,092,786 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
The calculations of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended September 30, 2008
was based on the profit attributable for equity shareholders of Rs.2,163,923 (as compared to
a profit of Rs.4,127,523 for the six months ended September 30, 2007) and a weighted average
number of equity shares outstanding during six months ended September 30, 2008 and six
months ended September 30, 2007 calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at September 30 (Basic) |
|
|
168,274,795 |
|
|
|
168,010,500 |
|
Effect of stock options outstanding |
|
|
734,360 |
|
|
|
761,234 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at September 30 (Diluted) |
|
|
169,009,155 |
|
|
|
168,771,734 |
|
|
The calculations of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2008
was based on the profit attributable for equity shareholders of Rs.1,052,632 (as compared to
a profit of Rs.2,527,857 for the three months ended September 30, 2007) and a weighted
average number of equity shares outstanding during three months ended September 30, 2008 and
three months ended September 30, 2007 calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at September 30 (Basic) |
|
|
168,340,022 |
|
|
|
168,092,786 |
|
Effect of stock options outstanding |
|
|
579,537 |
|
|
|
550,338 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at September 30 (Diluted) |
|
|
168,919,559 |
|
|
|
168,643,124 |
|
|
17. Employee stock incentive plans
Dr. Reddys Employees Stock Option Plan-2002 (the DRL 2002 Plan):
The Company instituted the DRL 2002 Plan for all eligible employees pursuant to the special
resolution approved by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting held on September 24,
2001. The DRL 2002 Plan covers all employees of DRL and its subsidiaries and directors
(excluding promoter directors) of DRL and its subsidiaries (collectively, eligible
employees). The compensation committee of the Board of DRL (the Compensation Committee)
administers the DRL 2002 Plan and grants stock options to eligible employees. The
Compensation Committee determines which eligible employees will receive options, the number
of options to be granted, the exercise price, the vesting period and the exercise period.
The vesting period is determined for all options issued on the date of grant. The options
issued under the DRL 2002 Plan vest in periods ranging between one and four years, and
generally have a maximum contractual term of five years.
The DRL 2002 Plan was amended on July 28, 2004 at the annual general meeting of shareholders
to provide for stock option grants in two categories:
39
17. Employee stock incentive plans (continued)
Category A: 1,721,700 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options
reserved for grant having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
underlying equity shares on the date of grant; and
Category B: 573,778 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options reserved
for grant having an exercise price equal to the par value of the underlying equity shares
(i.e., Rs.5 per option).
The DRL 2002 Plan was further amended on July 27, 2005 at the annual general meeting of
shareholders to provide for stock option grants in two categories:
Category A: 300,000 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options reserved
for grant having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying
equity shares on the date of grant; and
Category B: 1,995,478 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options
reserved for grant having an exercise price equal to the par value of the underlying
equity shares (i.e., Rs.5 per option).
Under the DRL 2002 Plan, the exercise price of the fair market value options granted under
Category A above is determined based on the average closing price for 30 days prior to the
grant in the stock exchange where there is highest trading volume during that period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may, after obtaining the approval
of the shareholders in the annual general meeting, grant options with a per share exercise
price other than fair market value and par value of the equity shares.
After the stock split effected in the form of stock dividend issued by the Company in August
2006, the DRL 2002 Plan provides for stock options granted in the above two categories as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
Under category |
|
Under category |
|
|
Particulars |
|
A |
|
B |
|
Total |
Options reserved under original Plan |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
1,995,478 |
|
|
|
2,295,478 |
|
Options exercised prior to stock dividend date (A) |
|
|
94,061 |
|
|
|
147,793 |
|
|
|
241,854 |
|
Balance of shares that can be allotted exercise
of options (B) |
|
|
205,939 |
|
|
|
1,847,685 |
|
|
|
2,053,624 |
|
Options arising from stock dividend (C) |
|
|
205,939 |
|
|
|
1,847,685 |
|
|
|
2,053,624 |
|
Options reserved after stock dividend (A+B+C) |
|
|
505,939 |
|
|
|
3,843,163 |
|
|
|
4,349,102 |
|
In April 2007, certain employees surrendered their category B par value options under the
DRL 2002 Plan in exchange for category B par value options under the DRL 2007 Plan
(discussed below). The incremental cost due to such modifications was insignificant.
The Compensation Committee at its meeting held in October 2007, proposed that the Company
should absorb the full liability of the Fringe Benefit Tax upon exercise of all stock
options granted on or prior to the date of its resolution. In respect of new grants to be
made by the Company subsequent to the date of such resolution, the Fringe Benefit Tax will
be recovered from employees upon the exercise of their stock options. The above amendment
was approved by the shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in July 2008.
Dr. Reddys Employees ADR Stock Option Plan-2007 (the DRL 2007 Plan):
The Company instituted the DRL 2007 Plan for all eligible employees in pursuance of the
special resolution approved by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting held on July
27, 2005. The DRL 2007 Plan became effective upon its approval by the Board of Directors on
January 22, 2007. The DRL 2007 Plan covers all employees of DRL and its subsidiaries and
directors (excluding promoter directors) of DRL and its subsidiaries (collectively,
eligible employees). The Compensation Committee administers the DRL 2007 Plan and grants
stock options to eligible employees. The Compensation Committee determines which eligible
employees will receive options, the number of options to be granted, the exercise price, the
vesting period and the exercise period. The vesting period is determined for all options
issued on the date of grant. The options issued under DRL 2007 plan vest in periods ranging
between one and four years, and generally have a maximum contractual
term of five years.
40
17. Employee stock incentive plans (continued)
The DRL 2007 Plan provides for option grants in two categories:
Category A: 382,695 stock options out of the total of 1,530,779 stock options
reserved for grant having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
underlying equity shares on the date of grant; and
Category B: 1,148,084 stock options out of the total of 1,530,779 stock options
reserved for grant having an exercise price equal to the par value of the underlying
equity shares (i.e., Rs.5 per option).
The Compensation Committee at its meeting held in October 2007, proposed that the Company
should absorb the full liability of the Fringe Benefit Tax upon exercise of all stock
options granted on or prior to the date of its resolution. In respect of new grants to be
made by the Company subsequent to the date of its resolution, the Fringe Benefit Tax will be
recovered from employees upon the exercise of their stock options. The above amendment was
approved by the shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held in July 2008.
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Ltd. Employee Stock Option Plan 2003 (the Aurigene ESOP
Plan):
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Limited (Aurigene), a consolidated subsidiary, adopted the
Aurigene ESOP Plan to provide for issuance of stock options to employees of Aurigene and its
subsidiary, Aurigene Discovery Technologies Inc., who have completed one full year of
service with Aurigene and its subsidiary. Aurigene has reserved 4,550,000 of its ordinary
shares for issuance under this plan. Under the Aurigene ESOP Plan, stock options may be
granted at an exercise price as determined by Aurigenes compensation committee. The options
issued under Aurigene ESOP Plan vest in periods ranging from one to three years, including
certain options which vest immediately on grant, and generally have a maximum contractual
term of three years.
During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Aurigene ESOP Plan was amended to increase the
total number of options reserved for issuance to 7,500,000 and to provide for Aurigenes
recovery of Fringe Benefit Taxes from employees upon the exercise of their stock options.
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Ltd. Management Group Stock Grant Plan (the Aurigene
Management Plan):
In the year ended March 31, 2004, Aurigene adopted the Aurigene Management Plan to provide
for issuance of stock options to management employees of Aurigene and its subsidiary
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Inc. Aurigene has reserved 2,950,000 of its ordinary shares
for issuance under this plan. Under the Aurigene Management Plan, stock options may be
granted at an exercise price as determined by Aurigenes compensation committee. As of
March 31, 2008, there were no stock options outstanding under the Aurigene Management Plan.
The plan was closed by a resolution of the shareholders in January 2008.
Stock options granted during the three months and six months ended September 30, 2008:
No options were granted during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The terms and
conditions of the grants made during the six months ended September 30, 2008 under the above
plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Vesting |
|
Contractual |
|
|
instruments |
|
price |
|
period |
|
life |
|
DRL 2002 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
350,820 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRL 2007 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
74,400 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurigene ESOP Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
17. Employee stock incentive plans (continued)
Stock options granted during the three months and six months ended September 30, 2007:
No options were granted during the three months ended September 30, 2007. The terms and
conditions of the grants made during the six months ended September 30, 2007 under the above
plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Vesting |
|
Contractual |
|
|
instruments |
|
price |
|
Period |
|
life |
|
DRL 2002 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
386,060 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRL 2007 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
206,818 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurigene ESOP Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Black-Scholes Model inputs used in computing the fair value of the grants made during the six months ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
28.79% - 30.07 |
% |
|
|
28.40% - 32.70 |
% |
Exercise price |
|
|
Rs. 5.00 |
|
|
|
Rs. 5.00 |
|
Expected term |
|
|
1 to 4 years |
|
|
|
1 to 4 years |
|
Discount rate Bond equivalent yield rate |
|
|
7.76%- 7.94 |
% |
|
|
7.80% - 8.20 |
% |
Dividend yield rate |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
The fair values of services received in return for share options granted to employees are
measured by reference to the fair value of share options granted. The estimate of the fair
value of the services received is measured based on the Black Scholes model.
For the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 an amount of Rs.114,300 and Rs.107,664,
respectively, and for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, an amount of
Rs.80,278 and Rs.63,590, respectively, has been recorded as total employee share based
expense under all employee stock incentive plans. As of September 30, 2008, there is
approximately Rs.338,356 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock
options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.12
years.
18. Employee benefit plans
Gratuity benefits
In accordance with applicable Indian laws, the Company provides gratuity, a defined benefit
retirement plan (the Gratuity Plan) covering certain categories of employees. The
Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement or termination
of employment. The amount of payment is based on the respective employees last drawn
salary and the years of employment with the Company. Effective September 1, 1999, the
Company established the Dr. Reddys Laboratories Gratuity Fund (the Gratuity Fund).
Liabilities in respect of the Gratuity Plan are determined by an actuarial valuation, based
upon which the Company makes contributions to the Gratuity Fund. Trustees administer the
contributions made to the Gratuity Fund. Amounts contributed to the Gratuity Fund are
invested in specific securities as mandated by law and generally consist of federal and
state government bonds and debt instruments of government-owned corporations.
42
18. Employee Benefit Plans (continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the six months ended and three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
|
21,325 |
|
|
|
17,391 |
|
|
|
10,662 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
11,102 |
|
|
|
6,708 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(10,619 |
) |
|
|
(8,446 |
) |
|
|
(5,309 |
) |
|
|
(4,223 |
) |
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
Rs. |
24,122 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,047 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,061 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,023 |
|
|
|
|
Details
of total employee benefits assets outstanding are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Present value of unfunded obligations |
|
Rs. |
3,884 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,074 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
345,284 |
|
|
|
319,267 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
(293,221 |
) |
|
|
(289,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net obligations |
|
|
55,947 |
|
|
|
33,265 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses |
|
|
(21,341 |
) |
|
|
(22,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employee benefits assets outstanding |
|
Rs. |
34,606 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan
All employees of Industrias Quimicas Falcon de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Falcon) are entitled
to a pension plan in the form of a Defined Benefit Plan. The pension plan provides a payment
to vested employees at retirement or termination of employment. This payment is based on
the employees integrated salary and is paid in the form of a monthly pension over a period
of 20 years computed based upon a predefined formula. Liabilities in respect of the pension
plan are determined by an actuarial valuation, based upon which the Company makes
contributions to the pension plan fund. This fund is administered by a third party who is
provided guidance by a technical committee formed by senior employees of Falcon.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the six months and three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
7,177 |
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
3,383 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
10,760 |
|
|
|
9,663 |
|
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(8,782 |
) |
|
|
(10,086 |
) |
|
|
(4,443 |
) |
|
|
(4,754 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial (gain)/loss |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
Rs. |
11,277 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,754 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,704 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,184 |
|
|
|
|
43
18. Employee Benefit Plans (continued)
Details of the total employee benefits assets outstanding are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Present value of unfunded obligations |
|
Rs. |
57,655 |
|
|
Rs. |
50,099 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
225,791 |
|
|
|
202,597 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
(229,265 |
) |
|
|
(212,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net obligations |
|
|
54,181 |
|
|
|
39,858 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses |
|
|
(66,951 |
) |
|
|
(61,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employee benefits assets outstanding |
|
Rs. |
(12,770 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(21,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. Loans and borrowings
Short term loans and borrowings
The Company had lines of credit of Rs.18,175,000 and Rs.17,659,000 as of September 30, 2008
and March 31, 2008, respectively, from its bankers for working capital requirements. These
lines of credit are renewable annually. The Company has the right to draw upon these lines
of credit based on its requirements.
An interest rate profile of borrowings from banks is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Rupee borrowings
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Foreign currency borrowings
|
|
LIBOR + 110 bps
|
|
LIBOR + 50-100 bps
|
|
|
Long term loans and borrowings
Long term loans and borrowings consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Rupee term loan |
|
Rs. |
10,345 |
|
|
Rs. |
13,305 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
14,198,297 |
|
|
|
14,183,927 |
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
305,486 |
|
|
|
291,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,514,128 |
|
|
|
14,488,554 |
|
Less: Current portion
Rupee term loan |
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
2,524,142 |
|
|
|
1,772,990 |
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
15,298 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,545,360 |
|
|
|
1,791,004 |
|
|
|
|
Non current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rupee term loan |
|
|
4,425 |
|
|
|
7,385 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
11,674,155 |
|
|
|
12,410,937 |
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
290,188 |
|
|
|
279,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
11,968,768 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,697,550 |
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended September 30, 2008, the Company repaid Rs.950,440 of foreign
currency loans (consisting of Euro 13.68 million and U.S.$0.76 million), Rs.2,960 of rupee
term loans and Rs.4,482 of obligations under capital leases. During the year ended March 31,
2008, the Company repaid Rs.7,733,301 of foreign currency loans (Euro 139.49 million and
U.S.$0.51 million) and Rs.5,290 of rupee term loans, and assumed net obligations of
Rs.20,715 under capital leases.
44
19. Loans and borrowings (continued)
An interest rate profile of long-term debt is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Rupee borrowings |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Foreign currency borrowings |
|
EURIBOR + 70 bps or |
|
|
EURIBOR + 70 200bps or |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 70 bps |
|
|
LIBOR + 70 bps |
|
The fair value of the foreign currency loans and the capital lease obligations approximate
their carrying values as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
20. Related parties
The Company has entered into transactions with the following related parties:
Diana Hotels Limited for availing hotel services;
A.R. Life Sciences Private Limited for availing processing services of raw materials
and intermediates;
Dr. Reddys Holdings Private Limited for the purchase and sale of active
pharmaceutical ingredients and for advances taken;
Dr. Reddys Foundation for Human and Social Development towards contributions for
social development;
Institute of Life Science towards contributions for social development;
K.K Enterprises for availing packaging services for formulation products; and
SR Enterprises for transportation services.
These are enterprises over which principal shareholders or key managerial personnel have
control or significant influence (significant interest entities).
The Company has also entered into transactions with its former associate Perlecan Pharma
Private Limited (now a subsidiary) and its joint venture Kunshan Rotam Reddy Pharmaceuticals
Co. Limited (KRRP). These transactions are in the nature of reimbursement of research and
development expenses incurred by the Company on behalf of Perlecan Pharma Private Limited,
revenue from research services performed by the Company for Perlecan Pharma Private Limited
and purchase of active pharmaceutical ingredients by the Company from KRRP.The Company has
also entered into cancellable operating lease transactions with directors and their
relatives.
The following is a summary of significant related party transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Purchases from significant interest entities |
|
|
146,625 |
|
|
|
133,157 |
|
|
|
98,153 |
|
|
|
71,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to significant interest entities |
|
|
66,207 |
|
|
|
60,216 |
|
|
|
36,835 |
|
|
|
48,249 |
|
Contribution to a significant interest entity
towards social development |
|
|
68,685 |
|
|
|
18,200 |
|
|
|
33,685 |
|
|
|
11,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,658 |
|
Reimbursement of research and development
expenses from associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease rental paid under cancellable operating
leases to key managerial personnel and their
relatives |
|
|
10,922 |
|
|
|
9,698 |
|
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
|
6,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel expenses paid |
|
|
4,836 |
|
|
|
6,213 |
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
Advances taken from significant interest entities |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
45
20. Related parties (continued)
The following table describes the components of managerial remuneration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Particulars |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Salaries |
|
Rs. |
6,300 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,100 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,150 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,050 |
|
Commission* |
|
|
90,860 |
|
|
|
85,531 |
|
|
|
25,580 |
|
|
|
44,059 |
|
Other Perquisites |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
98,100 |
|
|
Rs. |
92,501 |
|
|
Rs. |
29,200 |
|
|
Rs. |
47,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Accrued based on profit as of the applicable date in accordance with the terms of
employment. |
The Company has the following amounts due from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Significant interest entities |
|
Rs. |
38,968 |
|
|
Rs. |
26,396 |
|
Associates |
|
|
63,309 |
|
|
|
26,964 |
|
Directors and relatives |
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
The Company has the following amounts due to related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
Significant interest entities
|
Rs. |
132,172
|
|
Rs. |
16,750 |
|
The above table as at September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 does not include an amount of
Rs.680,000 paid as an advance towards purchase of land from a significant interest entity,
which has been disclosed under capital work-in-progress.
21. Contingencies
Guarantees
The Companys equity accounted investee, KRRP, secured a credit facility of Rs.27 million
from Agricultural Bank of China (Agricultural Bank). During the year ended March 31, 2008,
the Company had issued a corporate guarantee of Rs.27 million in favor of Agricultural Bank
to enhance the credit standing of KRRP. The guarantee is required to be renewed every year
and the Companys liability may arise in the event of non-payment by KRRP of the amount
withdrawn under its credit facility.
Litigations, etc.
The Company is involved in disputes, lawsuits, claims, governmental and/or regulatory
inspections, inquiries, investigations and proceedings, including patent and commercial
matters that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The more
significant matters are discussed below.
Most of the claims involve complex issues. Often, these issues are subject to uncertainties
and therefore the probability of a loss, if any, being sustained and an estimate of the
amount of any loss are difficult to ascertain. Consequently, for a majority of these
claims, it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate of the expected financial effect,
if any, that will result from ultimate resolution of the proceedings. In these cases, the
Company discloses information with respect to the nature and facts of the case.
46
21. Contingencies (continued)
With respect to each of the legal proceedings described below, other than those which have
been disposed of, we are unable to make estimates of the possible loss or range of possible
losses at this stage, other than those where we have provided for the liability. We also do
not believe that disclosure of the amount sought by plaintiffs, if that is known, would be
meaningful with respect to those legal proceedings. This is due to a number of factors
including: the stage of the proceedings (in many cases trial dates have not been set) and
the overall length and extent of pre-trial discovery; the entitlement of the parties to an
action to appeal a decision; clarity as to theories of liability; damages and governing law;
uncertainties in timing of litigation; and the possible need for further legal proceedings
to establish the appropriate amount of damages, if any. However, although there can be no
assurance regarding the outcome of any of the legal proceedings or investigations referred
to in this Note 21 to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, the
Company does not expect them to have a materially adverse effect on its financial position.
However, if one or more of such proceedings were to result in judgments against the Company,
such judgments could be material to its results of operations in a given period.
Norfloxacin case
The Company manufactures and distributes Norfloxacin, a formulations product. Under the
Drugs Prices Control Order (the DPCO), the Government of India has the authority to
designate a pharmaceutical product as a specified product and fix the maximum selling
price for such product. In 1995, the Government of India notified Norfloxacin as a
specified product and fixed the maximum selling price. In 1996, the Company filed a
statutory Form III before the Government of India for the upward revision of the price and a
legal suit in the Andhra Pradesh High Court (the High Court) challenging the validity of
the notification on the grounds that the applicable rules of the DPCO were not complied with
while fixing the ceiling price. The High Court had previously granted an interim order in
favor of the Company; however it subsequently dismissed the case in April 2004. The Company
filed a review petition in the High Court in April 2004 which was also dismissed by the High
Court in October 2004. Subsequently, the Company appealed to the Supreme Court of India by
filing a Special Leave Petition, which is currently pending.
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company received a notice from the Government of
India demanding the recovery of the price charged by the Company for sales of Norfloxacin in
excess of the maximum selling price fixed by the Government of India, amounting to
Rs.284,984, including interest thereon. The Company filed a writ petition in the High Court
challenging this demand order. The High Court admitted the writ petition and granted an
interim order, directing the Company to deposit 50% of the principal amount claimed by the
Government of India, which amounted to Rs.77,149. The Company deposited this amount with
the Government of India in November 2005 and is awaiting the outcome of its appeal with the
Supreme Court. In February 2008, the High Court directed the Company to deposit an
additional amount of Rs.30,000, which was deposited by the Company in March 2008.
The Company has fully provided for the potential liability related to the principal amount
demanded by the Government of India and believes that the liability due to interest and
penalty is remote. In the event the Company is unsuccessful in its litigation in the
Supreme Court, it will be required to remit the sale proceeds in excess of the maximum
selling price to the Government of India including penalties or interest, if any, which
amounts are not readily ascertainable.
Excise demand in relation to a subcontracting arrangement
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the Central Excise Authorities of India (the
Authorities) issued a demand notice to a vendor of the Company regarding the assessable
value of products supplied by this vendor to the Company. The Company has been named as a
co-defendant in this demand notice. The Authorities demanded payment of Rs.175,718 from the
vendor, including penalties of Rs.90,359. Through the same notice, the Authorities issued a
penalty claim of Rs.70,000 against the Company. During the year ended March 31, 2005, the
Authorities issued an additional notice to this vendor demanding Rs.225,999 from the vendor,
including a penalty of Rs.51,152. Through the same notice, the Authorities issued a penalty
claim of Rs.6,500 to the Company. Furthermore, during the year ended March 31, 2006, the
Authorities issued an additional notice to this vendor demanding Rs.33,549. The Company has
filed appeals against these notices. In August and September 2006, the Company attended the
hearings conducted by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the CESTAT)
on this matter. In October 2006, the CESTAT passed an order in favour of the Company
setting aside all of the above demand notices. In July 2007, the Authorities appealed
against CESTATs order in the Supreme Court.
47
21. Contingencies (continued)
Patent related matters
In April 2006, the Company launched its fexofenadine hydrochloride 30 mg, 60 mg and 180 mg
tablet products, which are generic versions of Sanofi-Aventis (Aventis) Allegra® tablets.
The Company is presently defending patent infringement actions brought by Aventis in the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. There are three formulation
patents, three use patents, and two active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) patents which
are at issue in the litigation. The Company has obtained summary judgment in respect of each
of the formulation patents. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited (Teva) and Barr
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Barr) have been defending a similar action in the same court. In
September 2005, pursuant to an agreement with Barr, Teva launched its fexofenadine
hydrochloride 30 mg, 60 mg and 180 mg tablet products, which are AB-rated (bioequivalent) to
Aventis Allegra® tablets. Aventis has brought patent infringement actions against Teva and
its API supplier in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. There
are three formulation patents, three use patents, and two API patents at issue in the
litigation. Teva has obtained summary judgment in respect of each of the formulation
patents. On January 27, 2006, the District Court denied Aventis motion for a preliminary
injunction against Teva and its API supplier on the three use patents, finding those patents
likely to be invalid, and one of the API patents, finding that patent likely to be not
infringed. The issues presented during Tevas hearing are likely to be substantially similar
to those which will be presented with respect to Companys tablet products. Subsequent to
the preliminary injunction hearing, Aventis sued Teva and Barr for infringement of a new
patent claiming polymorphic forms of fexofenadine. The Company utilizes an internally
developed polymorph and has not been sued for infringement of the new patent. On November
18, 2008, Teva and Barr announced settlement of their litigation with Aventis. Litigation
between the Company and Aventis continues. No trial has been scheduled at this time. If
Aventis is ultimately successful in its allegation of patent infringement, the Company could
be required to pay damages related to fexofenadine hydrochloride tablet sales made by the
Company, and could also be prohibited from selling these products in the future.
In February 2006, Merck & Co. (Merck) initiated proceedings against betapharm before the
German Civil Court of Mannheim alleging infringement of the basic patent for Fosamax
(Mercks brand name for alendronate sodium). Betapharm and some other companies are selling
generic versions of this product in Germany. Mercks patent, which expired in April 2008,
was nullified in June 2006 by the German Federal Patent Court. However, Merck filed an
appeal against this decision at the German Federal Supreme Court. The German Civil Court of
Mannheim decided to stay the proceedings against betapharm until the German Federal Supreme
Court has decided upon the validity of the patent. In March 2007, the European Patent
Office granted Merck another patent for Fosamax, which is relevant to the composition of
betapharms alendronate sodium product. Betapharm filed protective writs to prevent a
preliminary injunction without a hearing. Betapharm has also filed an opposition against
this new patent at the European Patent Office, which has scheduled a hearing on the matter
in March 2009. In August 2007, Merck initiated patent infringement proceedings against
betapharm before a German civil court. The German court decided to stay these proceedings
until the European Patent Office has rendered a decision on the validity of the patent. As
of September 30, 2008, no injunction had been granted to Merck. There are other
jurisdictions within Europe where the innovators patent has already been revoked. Based on
a legal evaluation, the Company continues selling its generic version of Fosamax. If Merck
is ultimately successful in its allegations of patent infringement, the Company could be
required to pay damages related to the above product sales made by the Company, and could
also be prohibited from selling these products in the future.
The Company is aware of litigation with respect to one of its suppliers for oxycodon, which
is sold by the Company and other generics companies in Germany. In April 2007, a German
trial court rejected an application for an interim order by the innovator company against
the Companys supplier. The innovator has filed an infringement suit of formulation patents
against the Companys supplier in the German Civil Court of Mannheim as well as Switzerland
(where the product is manufactured). The Companys supplier and all licensees have filed a
nullity petition at the German Federal Patent Court, and have also filed a Declaration of
Intervention Against at the European Patent Office. The German court in Mannheim decided
that the Companys suppliers product is non-infringing, but the innovator appealed the
decision. The appeal is pending. As of September 30, 2008, based on a legal evaluation, the
Company continues to sell this product and believes that the patent infringement case does
not affect its ability to sell the product.
48
21. Contingencies (continued)
In October 2008, the United Kingdom Royal Court of Justice upheld the validity of Eli
Lillys U.K. patent covering Zyprexa®, its brand name for olanzapine. The Company is
appealing the decision. In view of this, the Company will not be able to launch its generic
olanzapine product in the United Kingdom unless it is successful in its appeal or until the
expiration of the basic patent. Due to the Companys loss of the case, it is required to
compensate Eli Lilly for a portion of its litigation costs. In November 2008, the Royal
Court of Justice ordered that the legal costs payable to Eli Lilly by the Company, after
taking into account certain discounts and reductions, would be between 0.77 million and 0.91
million pounds sterling. In November 2008, the Company paid 0.75 million pounds sterling as
an interim payment The Company has successfully obtained leave to appeal against this
decision. The legal costs recoverable by Lilly have been provided for in the unaudited
condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
During fiscal 2008, Eli Lillys German patent covering olanzapine was invalidated by the
German Patent Court. Eli Lilly, the innovator, appealed this decision before the German
Federal Court of Justice. Betapharm and certain other competitors have launched olanzapine
products in Germany pending the decision from the German Federal Court of Justice. Eli
Lilly filed an application for an interim order against betapharm claiming patent
infringement at the court in Düsseldorf, Germany, but in August 2008 the court decided not
to grant the interim order due to lack of urgency. In December 2008, the Federal Court of
Justice overruled the German Patent Court and decided to maintain the olanzapine patent in
favor of Eli Lilly, the innovator. The Company has subsequently stopped marketing this
product in the German market. Eli Lilly, as part of the litigation, is expected to claim
damages. Pending finalization of the discussions between the Company and Eli Lily, the
Company in accordance with IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Date, has recorded an amount
of Rs.744.51 million as of September 30, 2008 representing its estimate of the probable loss
arising out of the innovators expected damage claims.
Environmental matter
The Indian Council for Environmental Legal Action filed a writ in 1989 under Article 32 of
the Constitution of India against the Union of India and others in the Supreme Court of
India for the safety of people living in the Patancheru and Bollarum areas of Medak district
of Andhra Pradesh. The Company has been named in the list of polluting industries. In 1996,
the Andhra Pradesh District Judge proposed that the polluting industries compensate farmers
in the Patancheru, Bollarum and Jeedimetla areas for discharging effluents which damaged the
farmers agricultural land. The compensation was fixed at Rs.1.30 per acre for dry land and
Rs.1.70 per acre for wet land. Accordingly, the Company has paid a total compensation of
Rs.2,013. The matter is pending in the courts and the possibility of additional liability is
remote. The Company would not be able to recover the compensation paid, even if the
decision of the court is in favor of the Company.
Regulatory matters
In April 2008, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the United
States Federal Trade Commission (FTC). A CID is a request for information in the course
of a civil investigation and does not constitute the commencement of legal proceedings. The
Company has been informed that the focus of this civil antitrust investigation relates to
the settlement arrangement entered into between the Company and UCB Pharma Inc. (UCB)
resolving patent litigation concerning levetiracetam. The Company believes that the terms
of its settlement arrangement with UCB are consistent with all applicable antitrust laws.
The Company is cooperating fully with the FTC regarding this investigation. The request in
April 2008 from the FTC sought information to supplement the voluntary production the
Company had completed on February 1, 2008. The Company completed its response to the CID on
June 23, 2008. Since the production of this information, the FTC has not requested any
further information from the Company nor expressed concerns regarding the Companys
agreement with UCB. The FTC did later request additional information from other parties
involved in this investigation. The Company understands that those productions have been
completed and that the FTC has indicated that it has no further information requests. The
FTC has indicated, however, that it is not formally closing its investigation at this time.
While the Company does not expect further requests for information or other action by the
FTC with regard to the Companys agreement with UCB, since the investigation remains open,
the FTC maintains the ability to renew its requests at a later date.
49
22. Subsequent events
In November 2008, the Companys German subsidiary betapharm participated in a competitive
bidding (or tender) process for 64 pharmaceutical products announced by Allgemeinen
Ortskrankenkassen (AOK), a large public health insurance company in Germany. In this
tender, betapharm has been offered 8 products translating to 33 contracts. The results of
this tender, which were announced in December 2008, have been put on hold, as these are
being litigated by the drug manufacturers and are subject to process
reviews. There exists significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate
outcome of this matter which is not under the direct control of the Company and, therefore,
consequent impairment and adjustments, if any, that may be necessary to be made to the carrying value of
the Companys intangible assets and goodwill pertaining to the Groups German operations
cannot be reasonably determined at present.
In December 2008, the Federal Court of Justice in Germany overruled a German Patent Court
decision and upheld the validity of Eli Lillys patent covering olanzapine. Betapharm, the
Companys German subsidiary, and certain other competitors had earlier launched olanzapine
products in Germany pending the outcome of such appellate court decision. The Company has
subsequently stopped marketing this product in the German market. Eli
Lilly, as part of the
litigation, is expected to claim damages. Pending finalization of
the discussions between the Company and Eli Lilly, the Company in accordance with IAS 10,
Events After the Reporting Date, has recorded an amount of Rs.514.9 million, Rs.229.6
million and Rs.224.4 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008, September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively, representing its estimate of the probable loss
arising from the innovators expected damage claims.
50
ITEM 2. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements, the related cash flow statements and notes and the Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects included in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2008 on file with the SEC (our Form 20-F) and the unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements contained in this Report on Form 6-K and the related cash flow statement and
notes (collectively, the Financial Statements).
During this year we have decided to adopt IFRS and its interpretations issued by the IASB as the
accounting principles for our filings with the SEC. An explanation of how the transition to IFRS
has affected the reported financial position and financial performance of the Company is provided
in Note 4 of the Financial Statements. This Note includes reconciliations of equity, profit or
loss and cash flows for comparative periods under Previous GAAP to those reported for those periods
under IFRs.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. When used
in this discussion, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, intend, will and expect
and other similar expressions as they relate to us or our business are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise the
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Actual results, performances or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include those described under the heading Risk Factors in our Form 20-F. Readers are
cautioned not to place reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of their
dates.
The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates our performance and allocates
resources based on an analysis of various performance indicators by operating segments. The
operating segments reviewed by the CODM with effect from April 1, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients (PSAI); |
|
|
|
Global Generics; and |
|
|
|
Proprietary Products. |
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients. This segment includes active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediaries, also known as active pharmaceutical products or bulk drugs, which
are the principal ingredients for finished pharmaceutical products. Active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediaries become finished pharmaceutical products when the dosages are fixed
in a form ready for human consumption, such as a tablet, capsule or liquid, using additional
inactive ingredients. This segment also includes contract research services and the manufacture and
sale of active pharmaceutical ingredients and steroids in accordance with the specific customer
requirements.
Global Generics. This segment consists of finished pharmaceutical products ready for consumption by
the patient, marketed under a brand name or as generic finished dosages with therapeutic
equivalence to branded formulations.
Proprietary Products. This segment involves the discovery of new chemical entities for subsequent
commercialization and out-licensing. It also involves our specialty pharmaceuticals business, which
is positioning to launch its sales and marketing operations for in-licensed and co-developed
dermatology products.
Accordingly, disclosures relating to the previous period have been reclassified/regrouped to
conform to the current period presentation. The explanations below have been suitably modified in
line with such changes.
51
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our consolidated revenues and
gross profits by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Rs. in millions) |
|
|
(Rs. in millions) |
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit % |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
% to total |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
% to revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
% to total |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
to revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical
Services and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
Ingredients |
|
Rs. |
4,827.7 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
1421.8 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
Rs. |
4,400.3 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
1,579.9 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Generics |
|
|
11,112.1 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
|
6,446.3 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
% |
|
|
7,947.7 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
% |
|
|
4,660.4 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products |
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
% |
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
163.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
16,151.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Rs. |
7,963.5 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
% |
|
Rs. |
12,451.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Rs. |
6,281.5 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, financial data as percentages of
total revenues and the increase (or decrease) by item as a percentage of the amount over the
comparable period in the previous year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Sales |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Percentage |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
49.3 |
% |
|
|
50.4 |
% |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
Not Comparable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating activities |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income/(expense), net |
|
|
(3.0 |
)% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
Not Comparable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income taxes |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
(10.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit, net |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
(8.8 |
)% |
|
Not Comparable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
(58.3 |
)% |
52
Statement on Changes in Profit Figures Subsequent to Earnings Releases
On July 21, 2008, we issued an earnings release for the three month period ended June 30, 2008
which discussed our unaudited condensed consolidated financial results as determined pursuant to
Previous GAAP. Subsequently, we elected to present our financial statements pursuant to IFRS and,
on October 23, 2008, we issued earnings releases for the three month periods ending June 30, 2008
and September 30, 2008, which discussed our financial results under IFRS. In this October 23,
2008 earnings release we reported a net profit of Rs.1,211,724 for the three month period ended
September 30, 2008. Subsequently, in December 2008, we noted an adverse judgment with respect to
our olanzapine litigation in Germany.
As a result of this development and in accordance with IAS 10, Events After the Reporting Period,
we have recorded a probable loss (net of related tax benefits) of Rs.365,679 and Rs.159,092 arising
out of this dispute in our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively, as an adjusting subsequent
event. We had included the entire loss arising out of this litigation as part of our earnings
release for the three month period ended December 31, 2008. The loss has now been allocated among
the three month periods ended June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2008, respectively, based on
underlying sales of the product in the respective periods.
As a result of the allocation of the probable loss reported for the three month period ended
December 31, 2008 among the three month periods ended June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2008,
the profitability and related figures in the above referenced earnings releases will vary from the
figures contained in our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in
Form 6-K for such periods. Accordingly, the cumulative profitability and related figures reported
for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 will be consistent with the earnings releases.
Revenues
Our overall revenues increased by 29.7% to Rs.16,151.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, from Rs.12,451.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Excluding revenues from a unit of Dow Chemical Company associated with its United Kingdom sites in
Mirfield and Cambridge (hereinafter referred to as the Dow Pharma Unit), BASFs Manufacturing
facility in Shreveport, Louisiana, U.S.A. and related pharmaceutical contract manufacturing
(hereinafter referred to as the Shreveport facility) and Jet Generici SRL (hereinafter referred
to as Jet Generici), each of which was acquired in April 2008, revenues grew by 23.7% to
Rs.15,399.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, from Rs.12,451.2 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Revenues from our Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients segment increased by 9.7% to
Rs.4,827.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, from Rs.4,400.3 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of growth in revenues
from North America (the United States and Canada) and emerging markets such as North Asia, Latin
America and the Middle East. Excluding revenues of Rs.297.9 million from the Dow Pharma Unit
acquired in April 2008, revenues from this segment increased by 2.9% compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2007.
Revenues from our Global Generics segment increased by 39.8% to Rs.11,112.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, from Rs.7,947.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase was driven by a growth in revenues from North America (the United
States and Canada), Europe, India, Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union. Excluding
revenues of Rs.428.0 million from the Shreveport facility and revenues of Rs.25.5 million from Jet
Generici, each of which was acquired in April 2008, revenues from this segment increased by 34.1%
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we received 26.5% of our revenues from North America
(the United States and Canada), 27.0% of our revenues from Europe, 11.5% of our revenues from
Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union, 17.9% of our revenues from India and 17.1%
of our revenues from other countries.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the average Indian rupee/U.S.$exchange rate
depreciated by approximately 8.2% as compared to the average exchange rate for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. This depreciation had a positive impact on our sales because of the
increase in rupee realization from sales in U.S. Dollars. However, this positive impact was
partially offset due to mark to market losses upon maturity of foreign currency derivative
contracts acquired to mitigate the risks of foreign currency volatility. The foregoing Indian
rupee/U.S.$ exchange rate depreciation resulted in a net decrease in our revenues by Rs.240.8
million during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Excluding the impact of
53
foreign currency derivatives, our total revenues grew by 31.6% to Rs.16,391.8 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.12,451.2 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
Segment analysis
Pharmaceutical
Services and Active Ingredients.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008,
this segment contributed 29.9% of our total revenues, as compared to 35.3% for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. Revenues in this segment increased by 9.7% to Rs.4,827.7 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.4,400.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. Excluding revenues from the Dow Pharma Unit acquired in April 2008, revenues
from this segment increased by 2.9% to Rs.4,529.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.4,400.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, revenues in India accounted for 13.6% of our
revenues from this segment as compared to 16.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Revenues in India decreased by 6.6% to Rs.656.5 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.703.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
This decrease was primarily due to decreases in revenues from sales of ciprofloxacin hcl,
fexofinadine hcl and fluoxetine, which were partially offset by increases in revenues from sales of
losartan potassium and enrofloxacin.
Revenues from outside India increased by 12.8% to Rs.4,171.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.3,697.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Revenues
in North America (the United States and Canada) increased by 30.2% to Rs.1,092.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.839.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily due to an increase in revenues from sales of
clopidogrel, sertraline hcl, montelukast, naproxen, escitalopram oxalate and ibuprofen, which
increase was partially offset by a decrease in revenues from sales of olanzapine and nizatidine and
ramipril.
Revenues from Europe decreased by 10.9% to Rs.1,175.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.1,319.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The
decrease was mainly due to a decrease in revenues from sales of olanzapine, ramipril, and enalapril
maleate, which decrease was partially offset by an increase in revenues from sales of sumatriptan,
finasteride and gemcitabine.
Revenues from Rest of the world markets (i.e., all markets other than North America, Europe,
Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union, and India) increased by 23.7% to Rs.1,903.1
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.1,538.5 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007, primarily due to increases in revenues from sales in South Korea, Israel,
Peru and Indonesia, which increases were partially offset by decreases in sales in Japan and Saudi
Arabia.
Global
Generics.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, this segment contributed 68.8%
of our total revenues, as compared to 63.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Revenues
in this segment increased by 39.8% to Rs.11,112.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.7,947.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Excluding revenues from the Shreveport facility and from Jet Generici, each of which was acquired
in April 2008, revenues from this segment increased by 34.1% to Rs.10,658.6 for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.7,947.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Derivative contracts acquired to hedge against foreign currency volatility resulted in a decrease
in this segments revenues by Rs.150.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Excluding the impact of hedging, this segments revenues increased by 41.7% to Rs.11,262.5 for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.7,947.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
Revenues from India constituted 20.1% of this segments total revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to 25.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Revenues
from India increased by 8.9% to Rs.2,236.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008
from Rs.2,053.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in revenues
was due to an increase in sales volumes of our key brands Nise, our brand of nimesulide, Razo, our
brand of rabeprazole, Stamlo, our brand of amlodipine, Omez, our brand of omeprazole, Atocor, our
brand of atorvastatin, and Clamp Paed, our brand of amoxicillin and clavulanate. The increase was
partially offset by a decrease in sales of Styptovit, our brand of vitamin K and other vitamins,
and Ciprolet, our brand of ciprofloxacin. New products launched in India in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 generated revenues of Rs.68.6 million for such period.
54
Revenues from outside India constituted 79.9% of this segments total revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, as compared to 74.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Revenues from outside India increased by 50.6% to Rs.8,875.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.5,894.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Revenues from North America (the United States and Canada) increased by 54.5% to Rs.3,140.0 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.2,033.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to increases in revenues from sales of
citalopram, fexofenadine, simvastatin and pravastatin, as well as new revenues from sales of
omeprazole (launched in November 2007), meprobamate (launched in March 2008) and finasteride
(launched in December 2007). These increases were partially offset by decreases in sales from
finasteride AG and ondansetron tablets.
Revenues from Europe increased by 45.0% to Rs.3,183.9 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.2,196.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. Revenues of betapharm increased from Rs.1,660.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 to Rs.2,782.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008,
primarily due to increases in revenues from sales of Grippeimpfstoff® beta (an influenza vaccine)
launched in September 2008, as well as increases in revenues from sales of olanzapine and
Alendronate beta, our brand of alendronate. These increases in revenues were partially offset by
decreases in sales of Simvabeta, our brand of simvastatin, Omebeta, our brand of omeprazole, and
Ramipril beta Comp, our brand of ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide. Revenues from sales of products
in the United Kingdom decreased by 11.9% to Rs.363.9 million from Rs.413.1 million primarily due to
a decrease in sales of amlodipine, which decrease was partially offset by increases in sales of
bisacodyl and fluoxetine.
Revenues from Russia increased by 35.8% to Rs.1,330.5 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.979.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. This
increase was due to higher sales volumes as well as higher prices of our key brands Nise, our brand
of nimesulide, Omez, our brand of omeprazole, and Ketorol, our brand of ketorolac.
Revenues from other countries of the former Soviet Union increased by 62.9% to Rs.524.8 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.322.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007, primarily due to an increase in revenues from Ukraine, Kazakhstan,
Belarus and Uzbekistan.
Revenues from other markets grew by 91.7% to Rs.696.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to Rs.363.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007,
primarily the result of growth of revenues from Venezuela, Jamaica, Vietnam and Brazil.
Gross Margin
Total gross margin as a percentage of total revenues was 49.3% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to 50.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Total gross
margin increased to Rs.7,963.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from
Rs.6,281.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Pharmaceutical
Services and Active Ingredients.
Gross margin of this segment decreased to 29.5% of
this segments revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to
35.9% of this segments revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in
gross margins was due to an increase in the cost of raw materials and solvents utilized for many
products, primarily due to increases in crude oil prices, as well as the impact of a change in
product mix (i.e., an increase in the proportion of lower gross margin products and a decrease in
the proportion of higher gross margin products) as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
Global
Generics.
Gross margin of this segment was 58.0% of this segments revenues for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to 58.6% of this segments revenues for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the proportion of
our revenues derived from high margin territories outside North America (the United States and
Canada) and Europe, such as India and Russia, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
55
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 32.7% for the
three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to 35.5% for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 19.7% to Rs.5,285.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.4,417.5 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in legal and
professional expenses, due to product related regulatory fillings and activities undertaken for the
three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase in marketing expenses, due to increased
advertisement activities undertaken for key products in Ukraine and Russia, higher mailing
advertisement costs in Germany, and an increase in general expenses and employee costs, due to an
increase in head count and annual raises.
Furthermore, amortization expenses increased by 16.3% to Rs.471.8 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 from Rs.405.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. This
increase was primarily due to expenses from amortization of intangibles added in the acquisition of
the Dow Pharma Unit, the Shreveport facility and Jet Generici of Rs.39.9 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased by 1.9% to Rs.824.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from Rs.809.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. As a
percentage of revenues, research and development expenses accounted for 5.1% of total revenue in
three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 6.5% for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in bio-studies costs,
due to higher research and development activity undertaken for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
Other expense/(income), net
Other expense was Rs.87.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to
income of Rs.68.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. This was primarily due to
the recording of a provision of Rs.229.6 million towards probable losses on account of recent
developments in the Eli Lilly damage claim on its olanzapine patent in Germany. The above decrease
was partially offset by an increase in income from sales of spent chemicals for the three months
ended September 30, 2008.
Results from operating activities
As a result of the foregoing, our results from operating activities increased to Rs.1,765.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.1,123.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2007.
Finance Income/(expense), net
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, our net finance expense was Rs.482.3 million, as
compared to net finance income of Rs.301.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, our finance income, excluding foreign exchange
gain/loss, decreased by 57.6% to Rs.92.9 million from Rs.218.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease was attributable to a decrease in our interest income from
fixed deposits resulting from a decrease in our fixed deposits base, and was partially offset by an
increase in gains on sales of investments. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, our
interest expense increased by 58.8% to Rs.279.5 million, from Rs.176.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007, primarily due to an increase in our packing credit loans in foreign
currencies and an increase in interest rates on our long loans and term borrowings.
Foreign exchange loss was Rs.295.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This was
primarily due to depreciation of the Indian rupee/U.S. dollar exchange rate by Rs.3.93, from
Rs.43.0 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 to Rs.46.9 for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. Such depreciation resulted in losses on short U.S.$/INR forward contracts and
translation losses on outstanding packing credit loans in foreign currencies.
Profit before income taxes
As a result of the foregoing, profit before income taxes and minority interest increased to
Rs.1,284.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to Rs.1,428.3 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Income tax expense/(benefit)
56
Income tax expense was Rs.232.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared
to an income tax benefit of Rs.1,098.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007. During the three months
ended September 30, 2007, pursuant to changes in German tax laws, the enacted tax rates decreased
by approximately 8%. This resulted in a reduction in the net deferred tax liability balance of
betapharm by Rs.1,458.8 million, which was recorded as a deferred tax benefit in our income
statement for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2007.
Profit for the period
As a result of the foregoing, our net income decreased to Rs.1,052.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.2,526.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
ITEM 3. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have primarily financed our operations through cash flows generated from operations and short
term loans and borrowings for working capital. Our principal liquidity and capital needs are for
making investments, the purchase of property, plant and equipment, regular business operations and
drug discovery.
As part of our growth strategy, we continue to review opportunities to acquire companies,
complementary technologies or product rights. To the extent that any such acquisitions involve cash
payments, rather than the issuance of shares, we may need to borrow from banks or raise additional
funds from the debt or equity markets.
The following table summarizes our statements of cash flows for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Rs. in millions, U.S.$ in thousands) |
|
Net cash from/(used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
U.S.$ |
(4,316 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(200.5 |
) |
|
Rs. |
2,300.2 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(56,480 |
) |
|
|
(2,632.5 |
) |
|
|
(3,008.8 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(16,694 |
) |
|
|
(775.4 |
) |
|
|
(8,514.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
U.S.$ |
(77,490 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(3,599.4 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(9,222.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow used in Operating Activities
The net cash used in operating activities was Rs.200.5 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of Rs.2,300.2 million
for the six months ended September 30, 2007. The net cash provided by operating activities
decreased significantly during the six months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to:
|
|
A decrease in profits for the period by Rs.1,959.5 million, primarily attributable to
higher selling, general and administrative costs, foreign exchange losses on derivative
contracts resulting from adverse changes in currency exchange rates, reduced interest income and provision made for innovators damage claims in the six months ended September 30, 2008; and |
|
|
An increase in cash outflow, primarily attributable to higher working capital
levels. This increase in working capital levels was primarily due to a build-up of inventory
levels as needed to meet the anticipated future requirements, as well as an increase in
receivables resulting from increases in sales and operations. |
Cash flow used in Investing Activities
Our investing activities provided a net cash outflow of Rs.2,363.5 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to a net cash outflow of Rs.3,008.8 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2007. This decrease in cash outflow from investing activities was primarily
due to higher cash inflows from sales of short term investments, which were liquidated to fund the
acquisitions of the Dow Pharma Unit, the Shreveport facility, Jet Generici and the balance of the
outstanding shares of Perlecan Pharma during the six months ended September 30, 2008. Such inflows
were partially offset due
57
to cash outflows on account of such acquisitions.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Our financing activities provided net cash inflow of Rs.775.4 million for the six months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to a net cash outflow of Rs.8,514.1 million for the six months
ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in net cash outflow from financing activities was primarily
due to lower repayment of long term debts for the six months ended September 30, 2008. For the six
months ended September 30, 2007, we repaid a significant portion of our long term debt that we had
borrowed to fund our betapharm acquisition. Furthermore, we also borrowed short term funds during
the six months ended September 30, 2008 to fund our short term working capital requirements.
The following table provides a list of our principal debts outstanding as of September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
Principal Amount |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
(Rs. in millions, U.S.$/EURO in thousands ) |
Short-term loans and borrowings from banks |
|
Rs. 7,675.2 U.S.$109,000 |
|
Rupee borrowings - 9% |
(for working capital) |
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
borrowings - |
|
|
|
|
LIBOR+ 110 bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
borrowings - |
Long term loans and borrowings |
|
Rs. 14,514.1 U.S.$9,398
|
|
LIBOR + 70 bps |
|
|
EURO 168,720 |
|
EURIBOR + 70 bps |
ITEM 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In July 2008, we purchased the entire equity holdings of Citigroup Venture Capital International
Mauritius Limited (Citigroup Venture) and ICICI Venture Funds Management Company Limited (ICICI
Venture) in Perlecan Pharma Private Limited (Perlecan Pharma) for Rs.757,802. Consequently,
Perlecan Pharma has become our wholly-owned subsidiary. Perlecan Pharma was formed in September
2005 as a joint venture among us, Citigroup Venture and ICICI
Venture. We, as a part of this joint
venture, had out-licensed four NCE assets to Perlecan Pharma. Perlecan Pharma had been engaged in
the clinical development and out-licensing of these four NCE assets.
In July 2008, we entered into a global distribution agreement for Ibuprofen API with Albemarle
Corporation (NYSE: ALB), a U.S.-based specialty chemicals company. Under the agreement, Albemarle
will supply Ibuprofen API from its Orangeburg Plant in South Carolina, U.S. to us for distribution
to our global client base.
In September 2008, we launched Combihale, a combination of a steroid and a long acting
bronchodilator, in India. It is used in the treatment of asthma and is available in two
combinations, Combihale FF (Formoterol + Fluticasone) and Combihale FB (Formoterol +
Budesonide). Combihale would be available along with Redihaler, a dry powder inhalation device
designed in-house, which will initially be given free of cost with Combihale.
In September 2008, we formally launched our U.S. Specialty Business through Promius Pharma, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary located in Bridgewater, New Jersey. The launch marks a milestone in
building a sustainable and profitable branded business in the United States. Promius Pharma, which
will initially focus on the branded dermatology market, is based on a platform of strategic
licensing initiatives and internal product development activities undertaken over the last several
years. Promius Pharmas current portfolio contains innovative topical products for the treatment
of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and seborrheic dermatitis. In October 2008, Promius Pharma launched
its first product, EPICERAM® skin barrier emulsion. EpiCeram® Skin Barrier Emulsion is a novel
prescription therapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, a skin disease.
In September 2008, we entered into a licensing and distribution agreement with Cosmederm
Technologies, a U.S. based specialty pharmaceutical company focused on dermatology and aesthetic
medicine. Under this agreement, we have exclusive
58
rights to distribute Cosmederm Technologies
unique skin care products throughout India. The partnership is for two product lines: REFINITY peel
kits (glycolic acid 70%) and COSMEDERM peel kits (glycolic acid 50%). Through this partnership, we
are entering the aesthetic dermatology segment in India and consolidating our position in
cosmeceuticals.
In November 2008, we launched the authorized generic version of GlaxoSmithKlines Imitrex®
(sumatriptan succinate) tablets 25mg, 50mg, and 100mg in the United States. We are the first
company to launch an authorized generic version of Imitrex® tablets in the U.S. market.
GlaxoSmithKline Imitrex® tablets, which are indicated for the acute treatment of migraine
attacks in adults, had U.S. sales of $1.29 billion for the 12 month period ending December, 2007
according to IMS Health, a company which provides information on the pharmaceutical industry, in its
Moving Annual Total (MAT) report for the year ended December 2007.
In November 2008, our German subsidiary betapharm participated in a competitive bidding (or
tender) process for 64 pharmaceutical products announced by Allgemeinen Ortskrankenkassen
(AOK), a large public health insurance company in Germany. In this tender, betapharm has been
offered 8 products translating to 33 contracts. The results of this tender, which were announced
in December 2008, have been put on hold, as these are being litigated by the drug manufacturers and
are subject to process reviews.
In December 2008, the Federal Court of Justice in Germany overruled a German Patent Court decision
and upheld the validity of Eli Lillys patent covering olanzapine. Betapharm, our German
subsidiary, and certain other competitors had earlier launched olanzapine products in Germany
pending the outcome of such appellate court decision. We subsequently stopped marketing this
product in the German market. Eli Lilly, as part of the litigation is expected to claim damages.
In December 2008, we announced the settlement with Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor Inc. of
patent challenge litigation for desloratidine, the generic version of Clarinex(R). The
settlement agreements allow us to manufacture and market desloratidine in various strengths with
six months marketing exclusivity/co-exclusivity, starting in 2012. The agreements resolve all
pending patent infringement actions filed by Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor Inc. against
us in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
ITEM 5. TREND INFORMATION
Global Generics
The United States of America, Germany, India and Russia are the four key strategic markets for our
Global Generics business, contributing roughly 87% of the revenues of this segment for the nine
months ending December 31, 2008. In all of these markets, we continue to grow our revenues
consistently year after year as a result of our product franchise and customer and distributor
relationships built over the years.
In the United States, our revenues for the nine months ending December 31, 2008 represented an
increase of 128% as compared to our revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, led by
impressive growth of our existing and new products, the successful launch of sumatriptan (our
authorized generic version of Imitrex(R)), as well as the revenues from the acquisition
of the Shreveport facility. We are also looking at new channels of growth in the coming years
through our over-the-counter business and government business to further increase the scale of our
generics business in the United States. The acquisition of the Shreveport facility in the United
States was a strategic move in building manufacturing and packaging capability in the United
States. In December 2008, we announced the settlement with Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor
Inc. of patent challenge litigation for desloratidine, the generic version of
Clarinex(R). The settlement agreements allow us to manufacture and market desloratidine
in various strengths with six months marketing exclusivity/co-exclusivity, starting in 2012. The
agreements resolve all pending patent infringement actions filed by Schering-Plough Corporation and
Sepracor Inc. against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. This settlement
is in line with our approach of exploring all opportunities to best monetize our Paragraph IV
pipeline to create visibility and certainty of launches.
Continuing with our stated strategy, we intend to expand our portfolio over the next few years by
adding solid dosage forms, as well as alternate dosage forms, and by complementing our internal
product development effort through business alliances. We intend to broaden not only our customer
base but also our products by focusing more on difficult-to-make and low competition products.
In November 2008, we launched the authorized generic version of GlaxoSmithKlines Imitrex®
(sumatriptan succinate) tablets 25mg, 50mg, and 100mg in the United States. This is a result of the
settlement of patent litigation in October 2006 with
59
GlaxoSmithKline relating to sumatriptan
succinate tablets. We are the first company to launch an authorized generic version of Imitrex®
tablets in the United States market. Imitrex® tablets had U.S. sales of U.S.$1.29 billion for the
12 month period ending December, 2007 according to IMS Health in its MAT report for the 12 month
period ending December, 2007.
As of December 31, 2008, we had filed a total of 133 ANDAs with the U.S. FDA. We had 69 ANDAs
pending approval with
the U.S. FDA as of December 31, 2008, which included 13 tentative approvals.
In Germany, the pharmaceutical industry continues to go through health care reforms which have put
pressure on prices. As of April 1, 2007, the Statutory Health Insurance Competition Strengthening
Act (also known as the GKV-WSG Act) took effect in Germany with the purpose of strengthening
competition in public health insurance to regulate the German health care system. The law has
significantly increased the power of the insurance companies and statutory health insurance (SHI)
funds by allowing them to enter into direct rebate contracts with suppliers of pharmaceuticals. It
further incentivizes doctors to prescribe generic drugs covered by such rebate contracts. The
pharmacist is also required, when dispensing drugs, to give a preference to such drugs as are
covered by rebate contracts. Thus, successfully concluding rebate contracts with insurance
companies is a factor critical to succeeding in the competition for market share in the generic
prescription drug market. betapharm has signed for rebate contracts with a large number of SHI
funds covering a major part of the insured population in the aggregate.
In January 2008, new reference prices became effective under the GKV-WSG Act. Subsequently, new
co-payment release prices were announced and which were effective June 1, 2008.
During fiscal 2009, we significantly reduced our dependence upon products from our single largest
supplier in Germany by shifting the sourcing to our own internal supply network in Europe and
India. During fiscal 2009, we successfully completed the transfer of the manufacturing processes
for a large part of our active pharmaceutical ingredient requirements to our manufacturing facility
in India. The benefits of this transfer include reduced product manufacturing costs and supply
assurance. We have begun to realize the benefits from the easing of supply pressures, and the
market share of betapharm in Germany has recovered to 2.6% in December 2008 as compared to a low
of 1.74% in April 2007, according to Insight Health, a company which provides information on the German pharmaceutical industry, in its NVI market report for December 2008.
In August 2008, Allgemeinen Ortskrankenkassen (AOK), a large German health insurance company,
announced a competitive bidding (or tender) process for pharmaceutical companies for 64 products
for 2009 and 2010. In this tender, betapharm has been offered 8 products translating to 33
contracts. The results of this tender, which were announced in December 2008, have been put on
hold, as these are being litigated by the drug manufacturers and are subject to process reviews. We
believe that ongoing health care reforms and changing market dynamics in terms of a move to
commoditized environment will continue to cause pressure on price realization of our product
portfolio in Germany. We are monitoring the developments closely to take suitable actions to ensure
that we remain competitive.
In India, Operation Research Group International Medical Statistics (ORG IMS) in its December 2008 MAT report has noted that the Indian pharmaceutical market
continues to be highly fragmented and dominated by Indian companies. The industry recorded retail
sales of approximately U.S.$ 7 billion (Rs.341 billion), representing a growth in value of 9.8% over
the previous year on a MAT basis. According to such ORG IMS report, the Indian pharmaceutical
market is projected to grow at 12-14% per annum between 2008 and 2020, achieving a terminal market
value of U.S.$30 billion. The major growth influencers will be population dynamics, high disease
prevalence, increased health care access, changing health care models and greater capacity to
spend.
According to ORG IMS in its December MAT 2008 report, the market share of the No. 1 ranked Indian
retail sales pharmaceutical company was approximately 5%. In this competitive scenario, we are the
13th ranked Indian pharmaceutical company, with a market share of 2.2%. However our
growth during the nine months ending December 31, 2008 was below the industry growth rate, largely
due to a change in our supply chain model to a replenishment based model.
In Russia, we continue to match the industry growth rate in the retail segment. According to
Pharmexpert, a market research firm, in its April-November 2008 report, we grew by 25% as compared
to a market growth rate of 27% in Russia. We were the fastest growing international branded generic company by
sales volumes in Russia for such period, and we grew by 16% as compared to the industry decrease of
1% for such period. In the Pharmexpert MAT report for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, we are
ranked No. 15 in sales in Russia, with a market share of 1.4% for the quarter ending December 31,
2008. We also consolidated our new hospitals and over the counter product businesses, which account
for slightly more than 25% of our Russian revenues and which are supplementing the growth led by
our prescription business
We continue to experience high growth from the countries in the former Soviet Union, Venezuela,
Jamaica and Sri Lanka through existing products and new product launches.
60
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients
In this segment, we are focused on acquiring new customers and increasing our level of engagement
with existing customers in global key markets by marketing additional products from our product
portfolio. We are also focused on identifying unique product opportunities in key markets and
protecting them through patenting strategies.
In this segment, we also market process development and manufacturing services to customers
primarily consisting of innovator pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with an objective to
become their preferred partner of choice. The focus is to leverage our skills in process
development, analytical development, formulation development and Current Good Manufacturing
Practice (cGMP) manufacturing to serve the customers needs.
As of December 31, 2008, we had a pipeline of 335 drug master filings (DMFs), of which 138 were
in the United States. With patent expirations in several markets in the next few years, we intend
to promote growth in fiscal 2010 and beyond by leveraging our strong intellectual property
expertise and DMF pipeline. The success of our products in our key markets is contingent upon the
extent of competition in the generics market, and we anticipate that such competition will continue
to be significant.
For this segment, our revenues for the nine months ending December 31, 2008 grew by approximately
13% and the growth was mainly led by the active pharmaceutical ingredients division as well as the
acquisition of the Dow Pharma Unit. However, the business catering to the innovator pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies did not register any growth due to the slowdown of orders from
biotechnology customers and the current global macro-economic factors.
Proprietary Products
Our investments in research and development of new chemical entities (NCEs) have been
consistently focused towards developing promising therapeutics. Strategically, we continue to seek
licensing and development arrangements with third parties to further develop our pipeline products.
As part of our research program, we also pursue collaborations with leading institutions and
laboratories all over the world.
Currently, we have a pipeline of 2 NCEs in clinical development and 1 in pre-clinical development.
These compounds are being developed in partnership with Nordic Bioscience, ClinTec International
and Argenta Discovery. As we make progress in advancing our pipeline through various stages of
clinical development we are also building capabilities in drug development. We believe this will
help to enhance the value of our NCE assets. We expect to further complement our internal research
and development efforts by pursuing strategic partnerships and alliances in our key focus areas.
Building a specialty branded business in the United States was one of the important aspects of our
innovation strategy. The specialty business has launched its own sales and marketing operations for
in-licensed products in the dermatology therapeutic area in the United States while continuing to
work on development of new in-house products. This is the result of our continued efforts over the
last few years to establish this business through a combination of in-licensing initiatives as well
as internal pipeline development programs. Consequently, through our subsidiary Promius Pharma, we
launched Epiceram, our first dermatology prescription product in the United States, in October
2008. In the month of January 2009, Promius Pharma launched our second dermatology prescription product
Scytera. While initially we do not anticipate this to be a very significant business in terms of financial
parameters, it is an important step in our journey of building a business based on proprietary
products.
61
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Independent Auditors Report on Review of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial
Information |
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 10, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ V.S. Suresh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: V.S. Suresh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title: Company Secretary |
|
|
63