Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-5057
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
82-0100960
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
263 Shuman Boulevard
Naperville, Illinois
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
60563
(Zip Code) |
(630) 438-7800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding |
Class |
|
as of October 31, 2007 |
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
75,397,045 |
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OfficeMax Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
2,315,219 |
|
|
$ |
2,244,414 |
|
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs |
|
|
1,727,161 |
|
|
|
1,659,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
588,058 |
|
|
|
584,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and selling |
|
|
419,765 |
|
|
|
413,185 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
79,581 |
|
|
|
91,479 |
|
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
(1,521 |
) |
|
|
17,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
90,233 |
|
|
|
62,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(31,220 |
) |
|
|
(30,557 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
21,814 |
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(1,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
80,648 |
|
|
|
53,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(29,080 |
) |
|
|
(20,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before minority interest |
|
|
51,568 |
|
|
|
32,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest, net of income tax |
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
|
|
(1,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
49,929 |
|
|
|
31,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
48,998 |
|
|
$ |
30,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to quarterly consolidated financial statements.
3
OfficeMax Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
6,883,890 |
|
|
$ |
6,708,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold and occupancy costs |
|
|
5,136,809 |
|
|
|
4,978,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,747,081 |
|
|
|
1,730,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and selling |
|
|
1,233,114 |
|
|
|
1,231,529 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
262,237 |
|
|
|
267,383 |
|
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
(4,543 |
) |
|
|
131,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
256,273 |
|
|
|
100,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(91,296 |
) |
|
|
(92,274 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
66,628 |
|
|
|
66,117 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(5,858 |
) |
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
225,747 |
|
|
|
77,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(85,669 |
) |
|
|
(29,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before minority interest |
|
|
140,078 |
|
|
|
47,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest, net of income tax |
|
|
(4,174 |
) |
|
|
(3,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
135,904 |
|
|
|
44,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,972 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
135,904 |
|
|
|
33,683 |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(2,947 |
) |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
132,957 |
|
|
$ |
30,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to quarterly consolidated financial statements.
4
OfficeMax Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
147,351 |
|
|
$ |
282,070 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
749,902 |
|
|
|
556,733 |
|
Related party receivables |
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
997,613 |
|
|
|
1,071,486 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
69,463 |
|
|
|
129,496 |
|
Other |
|
|
60,830 |
|
|
|
51,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,032,419 |
|
|
|
2,096,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements |
|
|
38,062 |
|
|
|
36,195 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
389,322 |
|
|
|
359,481 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
828,730 |
|
|
|
794,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment |
|
|
1,256,114 |
|
|
|
1,189,686 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(675,130 |
) |
|
|
(610,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
580,984 |
|
|
|
579,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,242,095 |
|
|
|
1,216,032 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
200,173 |
|
|
|
201,304 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Timber notes receivable |
|
|
1,635,000 |
|
|
|
1,635,000 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
22,377 |
|
|
|
22,292 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
51,484 |
|
|
|
40,439 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
169,492 |
|
|
|
249,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,109,024 |
|
|
$ |
6,216,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to quarterly consolidated financial statements.
5
OfficeMax Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(thousands, except share and per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
December 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
34,888 |
|
|
|
25,634 |
|
Accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
798,522 |
|
|
|
965,218 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
45,920 |
|
|
|
32,482 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
141,299 |
|
|
|
172,632 |
|
Other |
|
|
364,272 |
|
|
|
332,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,384,929 |
|
|
|
1,528,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
349,517 |
|
|
|
384,246 |
|
Timber notes securitized |
|
|
1,470,000 |
|
|
|
1,470,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
1,819,517 |
|
|
|
1,854,246 |
|
Other long-term obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
266,139 |
|
|
|
287,122 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of assets |
|
|
179,757 |
|
|
|
179,757 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
270,866 |
|
|
|
350,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term obligations |
|
|
716,762 |
|
|
|
817,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
30,997 |
|
|
|
29,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockno par value; 10,000,000
shares authorized; Series D ESOP: $.01 stated
value; 1,138,860 and 1,216,335 shares
outstanding |
|
|
51,249 |
|
|
|
54,735 |
|
Common stock$2.50 par value; 200,000,000
shares authorized; 75,394,765 and 74,903,220
shares outstanding |
|
|
188,462 |
|
|
|
187,226 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
913,079 |
|
|
|
893,848 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,035,937 |
|
|
|
941,830 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(31,908 |
) |
|
|
(91,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,156,819 |
|
|
|
1,985,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
6,109,024 |
|
|
$ |
6,216,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to quarterly consolidated financial statements.
6
OfficeMax Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Cash provided by operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
135,904 |
|
|
$ |
33,683 |
|
Items in net income not using (providing) cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from affiliates |
|
|
(4,543 |
) |
|
|
(4,356 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
97,512 |
|
|
|
92,570 |
|
Minority interest, net of income tax |
|
|
4,174 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits expense |
|
|
6,086 |
|
|
|
10,321 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,453 |
|
|
|
30,997 |
|
Changes other than from acquisition of business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(173,568 |
) |
|
|
48,972 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
86,329 |
|
|
|
205,890 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(205,878 |
) |
|
|
(133,226 |
) |
Current and deferred income taxes |
|
|
16,641 |
|
|
|
43,911 |
|
Other |
|
|
45,339 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operations |
|
|
31,453 |
|
|
|
339,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for property and equipment |
|
|
(101,339 |
) |
|
|
(96,775 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
4,438 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for investment |
|
|
(102,087 |
) |
|
|
(92,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for financing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(35,758 |
) |
|
|
(34,376 |
) |
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(18,666 |
) |
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(25,510 |
) |
|
|
(65,478 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
5,852 |
|
|
|
112,682 |
|
Other |
|
|
(10,022 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used for financing |
|
|
(65,410 |
) |
|
|
(5,872 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(134,719 |
) |
|
|
241,556 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
282,070 |
|
|
|
72,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
147,351 |
|
|
$ |
313,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to quarterly consolidated financial statements.
7
Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
OfficeMax Incorporated (OfficeMax, the Company, we or our) is a leader in both
business-to-business and retail office products distribution. The Company provides office supplies
and paper, print and document services, technology products and solutions and furniture to large,
medium and small businesses, governmental offices, and consumers. OfficeMax customers are served by
more than 36,000 associates through direct sales, catalogs, the Internet and a network of retail
stores located throughout the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Mexico.
The accompanying quarterly consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OfficeMax
and all majority-owned subsidiaries as well as those of variable interest entities in which the
Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements are for the thirteen and thirty-nine
week periods ended on September 29, 2007 (also referred to as the third quarter of 2007 and
year-to-date 2007) and the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended on September 30, 2006
(also referred to as the third quarter of 2006 and year-to-date 2006). The Companys fiscal
year ends on the last Saturday in December. Due primarily to statutory audit requirements, the
Companys international businesses maintain December 31 year-ends.
The Company has prepared the quarterly consolidated financial statements included herein
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Some
information and note disclosures, which would normally be included in comprehensive annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. These
quarterly consolidated financial statements should be read together with the consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 30, 2006.
The quarterly consolidated financial statements included herein have not been audited by an
independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of management, include all
adjustments necessary to present fairly the results for the periods. Except as may be disclosed
within these Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements, the adjustments made were of a
normal, recurring nature. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results which may be
expected for a full year.
In 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-03, How
Sales Tax Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should be Presented in
the Income Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation). This EITF Issue clarifies that the
presentation of taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a gross
(included in revenues and costs) or net (excluded from revenues) basis is an accounting policy
decision that should be disclosed pursuant to Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 22,
Disclosure of Accounting Policies. The EITF Issue is effective for the Company beginning in
fiscal year 2007. We collect such taxes from our customers and account for them on a net (excluded
from revenues) basis. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 06-03 did not impact our consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued (Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
provisions of SFAS 157 are effective beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of the provisions of SFAS 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities including an amendment of SFAS 115, (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows
entities to choose, at specific election dates, to measure eligible financial assets and
liabilities at fair value that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a
company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in that items fair value in
subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current earnings. SFAS 159 is effective
beginning January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of SFAS
159.
8
2. Discontinued Operations
In December 2004, the Companys board of directors authorized management to pursue the
divestiture of a facility near Elma, Washington that manufactured integrated wood-polymer building
materials. The board of directors and management concluded that the operations of the facility were
no longer consistent with the Companys strategic direction. As a result of that decision, the
Company recorded the facilitys assets as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
reported the results of its operations as discontinued operations.
During 2005, the Company experienced unexpected difficulties in achieving anticipated levels
of production at the facility. These issues delayed the process of identifying and qualifying a
buyer for the business and as a result, the Company concluded that it was unable to attract a buyer
in the near term and elected to cease operations at the facility during the first quarter of 2006.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company recorded pre-tax expenses of $18.0 million for
contract termination and other closure costs. These charges and expenses were reflected within
discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
The liabilities of the Elma, Washington facility are included in current liabilities ($15.5
million at September 29, 2007 and $15.5 million at December 30, 2006, respectively) in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The estimated fair value of the related assets was zero at September
29, 2007 and December 30, 2006.
See Note 3, Discontinued Operations, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 30, 2006 for additional information related to the discontinued
operations.
3. Integration Activities and Facility Closures
In September 2005, the board of directors approved a plan to relocate and consolidate the
Companys retail headquarters in Shaker Heights, Ohio and its existing corporate headquarters in
Itasca, Illinois into a new facility in Naperville, Illinois. The Company began the consolidation
and relocation process in the latter half of 2005. During the third quarter and first nine months
of 2006, the Company incurred and expensed approximately $11.5 million and $38.1 million,
respectively, of costs related to the headquarters consolidation, all of which were reflected in
the Corporate and Other segment. The consolidation and relocation process was completed during the
second half of 2006.
During the first nine months of 2006, the Company closed 109 underperforming domestic retail
stores and recorded a pre-tax charge of $89.5 million ($11.3 million for employee severance, asset
write-off and impairment and other closure costs and $78.2 million for estimated future lease
obligations, net of estimated sublease income). Also, during the third quarter of 2006, the Company
announced the reorganization of our Contract segment and recorded a pre-tax charge of $7.9 million
for employee severance.
At September 29, 2007, approximately $31.3 million of the reserve for integration and facility
closures was included in accrued liabilities, other, and $51.8 million was included in other
long-term liabilities. At September 29, 2007, the integration and facility closure reserve included
approximately $78.2 million for estimated future lease obligations, which represents the estimated
net present value of the lease obligations and is net of anticipated future sublease income of
approximately $86.7 million.
9
Integration and facility closure reserve account activity during the first nine months of 2007
and 2006, including the headquarters consolidation, the 2006 store closures and the Contract
segment reorganization, as well as other previously disclosed integration and facility closure
activities, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Severance\ |
|
|
Write-off & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Retention |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Balance at December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
107,824 |
|
|
$ |
10,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,142 |
|
|
$ |
121,804 |
|
Charges to income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to estimated costs included in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(32,455 |
) |
|
|
(7,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
(41,573 |
) |
Non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
78,194 |
|
|
$ |
3,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
83,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Severance\ |
|
|
Write-off & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Retention |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
91,455 |
|
|
$ |
21,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
113,696 |
|
Charges to income |
|
|
81,830 |
|
|
|
18,801 |
|
|
|
9,089 |
|
|
|
25,792 |
|
|
|
135,512 |
|
Change in goodwill |
|
|
(11,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,000 |
) |
Changes to estimated costs included in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(55,572 |
) |
|
|
(24,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,988 |
) |
|
|
(98,368 |
) |
Non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,089 |
) |
|
|
(5,978 |
) |
|
|
(15,067 |
) |
Accretion |
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
111,563 |
|
|
$ |
14,415 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
128,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
The computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share for the third quarter and
first nine months of 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands, except per-share amounts) |
|
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
49,929 |
|
|
$ |
31,375 |
|
|
$ |
135,904 |
|
|
$ |
44,664 |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
(2,947 |
) |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
48,998 |
|
|
|
30,366 |
|
|
|
132,957 |
|
|
|
41,637 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) |
|
$ |
48,998 |
|
|
$ |
30,366 |
|
|
$ |
132,957 |
|
|
$ |
30,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sharesbasic income (loss) per common share |
|
|
75,376 |
|
|
|
74,235 |
|
|
|
75,237 |
|
|
|
72,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands, except per-share amounts) |
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
48,998 |
|
|
$ |
30,366 |
|
|
$ |
132,957 |
|
|
$ |
41,637 |
|
Preferred dividends eliminated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) before discontinued operations |
|
|
48,998 |
|
|
|
30,366 |
|
|
|
132,957 |
|
|
|
41,637 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) |
|
$ |
48,998 |
|
|
$ |
30,366 |
|
|
$ |
132,957 |
|
|
$ |
30,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sharesbasic income (loss) per common share |
|
|
75,376 |
|
|
|
74,235 |
|
|
|
75,237 |
|
|
|
72,648 |
|
Restricted stock, stock options and other |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sharesdiluted income (loss) per common share |
|
|
76,558 |
|
|
|
74,779 |
|
|
|
76,298 |
|
|
|
73,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net
The components of Other operating (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of
Income (Loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Integration activities and facility closures (See Note 3) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,345 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
135,512 |
|
Earnings from affiliates |
|
|
(1,521 |
) |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(4,543 |
) |
|
|
(4,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,521 |
) |
|
$ |
17,860 |
|
|
$ |
(4,543 |
) |
|
$ |
131,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Other Income (Expense), Net (non-operating)
The components of Other income (expense), net (non-operating) in the Consolidated Statements
of Income (Loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Additional Consideration Agreement adjustment (See Note 16) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,232 |
|
Receivable securitization program costs |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(2,774 |
) |
|
|
(5,562 |
) |
|
|
(7,929 |
) |
Other |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(179 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,401 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,858 |
) |
|
$ |
3,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
7. Income Taxes
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 at the beginning of 2007. This Interpretation
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS No.
109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
As a result of the implementation, the Company recognized a $4.0 million increase to reserves for
uncertain tax positions. This increase was accounted for as an adjustment to the beginning balance
of retained earnings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Including the cumulative effect of this
increase, at the beginning of 2007, the Company had $70.2 million of total gross unrecognized tax
benefits. As of September 29, 2007, the Company had $72.3 million of total gross unrecognized tax
benefits. The change in gross unrecognized tax benefits during the first nine months of
2007 includes a decrease of $11.3 million from settlements with tax authorities, an increase of $10.1 million in unrecognized tax benefits
and an increase of $3.3 million in penalties and interest. Of
the total gross unrecognized tax benefits, approximately $32 million
(net of the federal benefit on state issues) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits
that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in any future periods.
The remaining balance of approximately $40 million, if recognized, would be recorded as an
adjustment to goodwill and would not affect the effective tax rate. It is possible that the
Companys liability for uncertain tax positions will be reduced by as much as $22.4 million by the
end of third quarter 2008. Approximately $17.0 million of this amount would impact the Companys
effective tax rate with the remaining $5.4 million impacting goodwill. Such reductions would result
from the effective settlement of tax positions with various tax authorities.
The Company or its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and
multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has substantially concluded all U.S. Federal
income tax matters for 2002 and prior years. Years prior to 2003 are no longer subject to U.S.
Federal income tax examination. The Company is no longer subject to state income tax examinations
by tax authorities in its major state jurisdictions for years before 2002.
The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions
as part of income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, the Company had $5.8 million of accrued
interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. Income tax expense for the nine
months ended September 29, 2007 includes interest and penalties of $3.3 million.
For the nine months ended September 29, 2007, the Company paid income taxes, net of refunds
received, of $68.6 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company received
income tax refunds, net of income taxes paid, of $20.4 million.
8. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
49,929 |
|
|
$ |
31,375 |
|
|
$ |
135,904 |
|
|
$ |
33,683 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
11,304 |
|
|
|
10,067 |
|
|
|
52,414 |
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized retirement
and benefit costs (net of tax) |
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
63,783 |
|
|
$ |
41,442 |
|
|
$ |
195,991 |
|
|
$ |
33,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Sales of Accounts Receivable
The Company sold, on a revolving basis, an undivided interest in a defined pool of receivables
while retaining a subordinated interest in a portion of the receivables. The receivables were sold
without legal recourse to third party conduits through a wholly owned bankruptcy-remote special
purpose entity that was consolidated for financial reporting purposes. At December 30, 2006, $180.0
million of sold accounts receivable were excluded from receivables in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The Companys subordinated retained interest in the transferred receivables was
$111.2 million at December 30, 2006, and is included in receivables, net in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
On July 12, 2007, the Company entered into a new loan agreement (See Note 13. Debt). The new
loan agreement amended the Companys existing revolving credit facility and replaced the Companys
accounts receivable securitization program. The sold accounts receivable under the accounts
receivable securitization program at that date were refinanced with borrowings under the new loan
agreement and excess cash. The Company no longer sells any of its accounts receivable.
12
10. Investments in Affiliates
In October 2004, the Company sold substantially all of its paper, forest products and
timberland assets for approximately $3.7 billion in cash and other consideration to affiliates of
Boise Cascade, L.L.C. (the Sale). In conjunction with the Sale, the Company invested $175 million
in the equity units of affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. A portion (approximately $66 million) of
the equity units received in exchange for the Companys investment carry no voting rights.
This investment is accounted for under the cost method as Boise Cascade, L.L.C. does not
maintain separate ownership accounts for its members, the Company has less than a 20 percent voting
interest in Boise Cascade, L.L.C. and does not have the ability to significantly influence its
operating and financial policies. This investment is included in investment in affiliates in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has determined that it is not practicable to estimate the
fair value of this investment. However, the Company has not observed any events or changes in
circumstances that would have had a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment.
The Boise Cascade, L.L.C. non-voting equity units accrue dividends daily at the rate of 8% per
annum on the liquidation value plus accumulated dividends. Dividends accumulate semiannually to the
extent not paid in cash on the last day of June or December. The Company recognized dividend income
on this investment of $1.5 million and $4.5 million for the quarter and nine months ended September
29, 2007, respectively, and $1.5 million and $4.4 million for the quarter and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively.
11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to
the net tangible and intangible assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with the provisions of
SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we assess our acquired goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually in the absence of an indicator of
possible impairment, and immediately upon an indicator of possible impairment. We completed our
annual assessment in accordance with the provisions of the standard during the first quarters of
2007 and 2006, and concluded there was no impairment. During the first quarters of 2007 and 2006,
we also evaluated the remaining useful lives of our finite-lived purchased intangible assets to
determine if any adjustments to the useful lives were necessary. We determined that no adjustments
to the useful lives of our finite-lived purchased intangible assets were necessary.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OfficeMax, |
|
|
OfficeMax, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Balance at December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
528,090 |
|
|
$ |
687,942 |
|
|
$ |
1,216,032 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
25,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,147 |
|
Businesses acquired |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
554,153 |
|
|
$ |
687,942 |
|
|
$ |
1,242,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Acquired Intangible Assets
Intangible assets represent the values assigned to trade names, customer lists and
relationships, noncompete agreements and exclusive distribution rights of businesses acquired. The
trade name assets have an indefinite life and are not amortized. All other intangible assets are
amortized on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. Customer lists and
relationships are amortized over three to 20 years, noncompete agreements over their terms, which
are generally three to five years, and exclusive distribution rights over ten years. Intangible
assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Trade names |
|
$ |
173,150 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
173,150 |
|
Customer lists and relationships |
|
|
42,601 |
|
|
|
(21,843 |
) |
|
|
20,758 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
12,882 |
|
|
|
(10,187 |
) |
|
|
2,695 |
|
Exclusive distribution rights |
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
(2,588 |
) |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
234,791 |
|
|
$ |
(34,618 |
) |
|
$ |
200,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Trade names |
|
$ |
173,150 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
173,150 |
|
Customer lists and relationships |
|
|
39,681 |
|
|
|
(17,678 |
) |
|
|
22,003 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
(8,213 |
) |
|
|
4,640 |
|
Exclusive distribution rights |
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
229,300 |
|
|
$ |
(27,996 |
) |
|
$ |
201,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset amortization expense totaled $2.0 million and $5.2 million for the
quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2007, respectively. Intangible asset amortization
expense totaled $1.0 million and $4.8 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 30,
2006, respectively.
12. Timber Notes Receivable
In October 2004, OfficeMax sold its timberlands in exchange for timber installment notes
receivable in the amount of $1,635 million, which were credit enhanced with guarantees. The
guarantees were issued by highly-rated financial institutions and were secured by the pledge of
underlying collateral notes issued by the credit enhancement banks. The timber installment notes
receivable are 15-year non-amortizing. There are two notes that total $817.5 million bearing
interest at 4.982% and a third note in the amount of $817.5 million bearing interest at 5.112%.
Interest earned on all of the notes is received semiannually. See sub-caption Timber Notes in
Note 13, Debt, for additional information concerning a securitization transaction involving the
timber installment notes receivable.
13. Debt
Credit Agreements
On July 12, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement
(the Loan Agreement) with a group of banks. The Loan Agreement amended the Companys existing
revolving credit facility and replaced the Companys accounts receivable securitization program.
The new Loan Agreement permits the Company to borrow up to a maximum of $700 million in accordance
with a borrowing base calculation equal to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a
percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The Loan Agreement may be
increased (up to a maximum of $800 million) at the Companys request or reduced from time to time,
in each case according to terms detailed in the Loan Agreement. There were no borrowings
outstanding under the revolver as of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006. Letters of credit,
which may be issued under the revolver up to a maximum of $250 million, reduce available borrowing
capacity under the revolving credit facility. Letters of credit issued under the revolver totaled
$82.3 million as of September 29, 2007 and $75.5 million as of December 30, 2006. As of September
29, 2007, the maximum aggregate borrowing amount available under the revolver was $700.0 million
and excess availability under the revolver totaled $617.7 million.
14
Borrowings under the revolver bear interest at rates based on either the prime rate or the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Margins are applied to the applicable borrowing rates and
letter of credit fees under the revolver depending on the level of average excess availability.
Fees on letters of credit issued under the revolver were charged at a weighted average rate of
0.875% during the third quarter of 2007. The Company is also charged an unused line fee of 0.25% on
the amount by which the maximum available credit exceeds the average daily outstanding borrowings
and letters of credit.
Timber Notes
In October 2004, the Company sold its timberlands and received credit-enhanced timber
installment notes receivable in the amount of $1,635 million. (See Note 12, Timber Notes
Receivable). In December 2004, the Company completed a securitization transaction in which its
interest in the timber installment notes receivable and related guarantees were transferred to
wholly-owned bankruptcy remote subsidiaries that were designated to be qualifying special purpose
entities (the OMXQs). The OMXQs pledged the timber installment notes receivable and related
guarantees and issued securitization notes in the amount of $1,470 million. Recourse on the
securitization notes is limited to the pledged timber
installment notes receivable. The securitization notes are 15-year non-amortizing, and were
issued in two equal $735 million tranches paying interest of 5.42% and 5.54%, respectively.
As a result of these transactions, OfficeMax received $1,470 million in cash from the OMXQs,
and over 15 years will earn approximately $82.5 million per year in interest income on the timber
installment notes receivable and incur interest expense of approximately $80.5 million on the
securitization notes. The pledged timber installment notes receivable and nonrecourse
securitization notes will mature in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The securitization notes have an
initial term that is approximately three months shorter than the installment notes. The Company
expects to refinance its ownership of the installment notes in 2019 with a short-term secured
borrowing to bridge the period from initial maturity of the securitization notes to the maturity of
the installment notes.
The original entities issuing the credit enhanced timber installment notes are
variable-interest entities (the VIEs) under FASB Interpretation 46R, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. The OMXQs are considered to be the primary beneficiary, and therefore, the
VIEs are required to be consolidated with the OMXQs, which are also the issuers of the
securitization notes. As a result, the accounts of the OMXQs have been consolidated into those of
their ultimate parent, OfficeMax. The effect of the Companys consolidation of the OMXQs is that
the securitization transaction is treated as a financing, and both the timber notes receivable and
the securitization notes payable are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note Agreements
In October 2003, the Company issued $300 million of 6.50% senior notes due in 2010 and $200
million of 7.00% senior notes due in 2013. At the time of issuance, the senior note indentures
contained a number of restrictive covenants, substantially all of which have been eliminated
through the execution of supplemental indentures as described below. On November 5, 2004, the
Company repurchased approximately $286.3 million of the 6.50% senior notes and received the
requisite consents to adopt amendments to the indenture pursuant to a tender offer for these
securities. As a result, the Company and the trustee executed a supplemental indenture that
eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants, certain events of default and related
provisions, and replaced them with the covenants contained in the Companys other public debt.
Those covenants include a limitation on mergers and similar transactions, a restriction on secured
transactions involving Principal Properties, as defined, and a restriction on sale and leaseback
transactions involving Principal Properties.
On December 23, 2004, both Moodys Investors Service, Inc., and Standard & Poors Rating
Services upgraded the credit rating on the Companys 7.00% senior notes to investment grade. The
upgrades were the result of actions the Company took to collateralize the notes by granting the
note holders a security interest in $113 million in principal amount of General Electric Capital
and Bank of America Corp. notes maturing in 2008 (the pledged instruments). These pledged
instruments are reflected as restricted investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result
of these ratings upgrades, the original 7.00% senior note covenants have been replaced with the
covenants found in the Companys other public debt. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company
purchased and cancelled $87.3 million of the 7.00% senior notes. As a result, $92.8 million of the
pledged instruments were released from the security interest granted to the 7.00% senior note
holders, and were sold during the second quarter of 2005. The remaining pledged instruments
continue to be subject to the security interest, and are reflected as restricted investments in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
15
Other
The Company had leased certain equipment at its integrated wood-polymer building materials
facility near Elma, Washington under a capital lease. The lease agreement had a base term of seven
years and an interest rate of 4.67%. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company paid $29.1
million to terminate the lease agreement.
Cash payments for interest were $5.7 million and $26.4 million for the quarter and nine months
ended September 29, 2007, respectively, and $5.3 million and $27.1 million for the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
14. Retirement and Benefit Plans
The following represents the components of net periodic pension and other postretirement
benefit costs (income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
19,270 |
|
|
|
18,670 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(22,254 |
) |
|
|
(21,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Plan settlement/curtailment/closures expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income) |
|
$ |
2,490 |
|
|
$ |
3,022 |
|
|
$ |
(540 |
) |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,257 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
57,812 |
|
|
|
56,010 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(66,763 |
) |
|
|
(65,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
15,165 |
|
|
|
17,370 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
Plan settlement/curtailment/closures expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,954 |
) |
|
|
(2,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income) |
|
$ |
7,471 |
|
|
$ |
10,646 |
|
|
$ |
(1,385 |
) |
|
$ |
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum contribution requirement for the Companys plans for 2007 is approximately
$11 million. As of September 29, 2007, the Company has made contributions totaling $12.8 million.
15. Segment Information
The Company manages its business using three reportable segments: OfficeMax, Contract;
OfficeMax, Retail; and Corporate and Other. Each of the Companys segments represents a business
with differing products, services and/or distribution channels. Each of these segments requires
distinct operating and marketing strategies. Management reviews the performance of the Company
based on these segments.
16
OfficeMax, Contract distributes a broad line of items for the office, including office
supplies and paper, technology products and solutions and office furniture. OfficeMax, Contract
sells directly to large corporate and government offices, as well as small and medium-sized offices
in the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. This segment markets and sells through
field salespeople, outbound telesales, catalogs, the Internet and in some markets, including
Canada, Hawaii, Australia and New Zealand, through office products stores.
OfficeMax, Retail is a retail distributor of office supplies and paper, print and document
services, technology products and solutions and office furniture. OfficeMax, Retail has operations
in the United States, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. OfficeMax, Retail office supply
stores feature OfficeMax ImPress, an in-store module devoted to print-for-pay and related services.
The retail segment also operates office supply stores in Mexico through a 51%-owned joint venture.
Substantially all products sold by OfficeMax, Contract and OfficeMax, Retail are purchased
from independent third-party manufacturers or industry wholesalers, except office papers. These
segments purchase office papers primarily from the paper operations of Boise Cascade, L.L.C., under
a 12-year paper supply contract. (See Note 18, Commitments and Guarantees, of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006 for additional
information related to the paper supply contract).
Corporate and Other includes corporate support staff services and related assets and
liabilities.
Management evaluates the segments based on operating profits before interest expense, income
taxes, minority interest, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting changes. The
income and expense related to certain assets and liabilities that are reported in the Corporate and
Other segment have been allocated to the Contract and Retail segments. Certain expenses that
management considers unusual or non-recurring are not allocated to the Contract and Retail
segments.
An analysis of our operations by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
and Minority Interest (a) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
OfficeMax, Contract |
|
$ |
1,185,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,158,273 |
|
|
$ |
54,979 |
|
|
$ |
37,793 |
|
OfficeMax, Retail |
|
|
1,129,549 |
|
|
|
1,086,141 |
|
|
|
45,279 |
|
|
|
54,794 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,025 |
) |
|
|
(30,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,315,219 |
|
|
$ |
2,244,414 |
|
|
|
90,233 |
|
|
|
62,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,220 |
) |
|
|
(30,557 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,635 |
|
|
|
21,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80,648 |
|
|
$ |
53,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Taxes |
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
and Minority Interest (a) |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
OfficeMax, Contract |
|
$ |
3,647,331 |
|
|
$ |
3,535,777 |
|
|
$ |
155,875 |
|
|
$ |
149,266 |
|
OfficeMax, Retail |
|
|
3,236,559 |
|
|
|
3,173,125 |
|
|
|
134,572 |
|
|
|
43,988 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,174 |
) |
|
|
(92,760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,883,890 |
|
|
$ |
6,708,902 |
|
|
|
256,273 |
|
|
|
100,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,296 |
) |
|
|
(92,274 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,770 |
|
|
|
69,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
225,747 |
|
|
$ |
77,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
|
See Note 3, Integration Activities and Facility Closures and Note 5, Other Operating
(Income) Expense, Net for an explanation of certain unusual and/or non-recurring items
affecting the segments. |
17
16. Commitments and Guarantees
In addition to commitments for leases and long-term debt, and purchase obligations for goods
and services and capital expenditures entered into in the normal course of business, the Company
has various other commitments, guarantees and obligations that are described in Note 18,
Commitments and Guarantees, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006 (Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data). At September 29, 2007, other than a change in the average market price per
ton of the benchmark paper grade used to calculate payments under the Additional Consideration
Agreement with Boise Cascade L.L.C., described below, there had not been a material change to the
information regarding commitments, guarantees and contractual obligations disclosed in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006.
Pursuant to an Additional Consideration Agreement between OfficeMax and Boise Cascade, L.L.C.,
we may be required to make substantial cash payments to, or receive substantial cash payments from,
Boise Cascade, L.L.C. Under the Additional Consideration Agreement, the Sale proceeds may be
adjusted upward or downward based on paper prices during the six years following the Sale, subject
to annual and aggregate caps. Specifically, we have agreed to pay Boise Cascade, L.L.C. $710,000
for each dollar by which the average market price per ton of a specified benchmark grade of
cut-size office paper during any 12-month period ending on September 30 is less than $800. Boise
Cascade, L.L.C. has agreed to pay us $710,000 for each dollar by which the average market price per
ton exceeds $920. Under the terms of the agreement, neither
party will be obligated to make a payment in excess of $45 million in any one year. Payments
by either party are also subject to an aggregate cap of $125 million that declines to $115 million
in the fifth year and $105 million in the sixth year.
We record changes in the fair value of the Additional Consideration Agreement in our net
income (loss) in the period they occur; however, any potential payments from Boise Cascade, L.L.C.
to us are not recorded in net income (loss) until all contingencies have been satisfied, which is
generally at the end of a 12-month measurement period ending on September 30. As of September 30,
2007, the last day of the third 12-month measurement period, the average market price per ton of the
benchmark grade used to calculate payments due under the Additional Consideration Agreement was
$966. Based on this price, we expect to receive a payment of approximately $33 million from Boise
Cascade L.L.C. and we will recognize income of $33 million in the fourth quarter of 2007. As of
September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, the net amount recognized in our Consolidated Balance
Sheet related to the Additional Consideration Agreement (either receivable or payable) was zero.
17. Legal Proceedings and Contingencies
We are involved in litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of
our business. In the opinion of management, our recovery, if any, or our liability, if any, under
pending litigation or administrative proceedings would not materially affect our financial position
or results of operations. For information regarding legal proceedings and contingencies, see Note
19, Legal Proceedings and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 30, 2006 and Item 16. Legal Proceedings and Contingencies in the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
In
June 2005, the Company announced that the SEC issued a formal order
of investigation arising from the Companys previously announced
internal investigation into its accounting for vendor income. The Company launched its internal investigation
in December 2004 when the Company received
claims by a vendor to its retail business that certain employees
acted inappropriately in requesting promotional payments and in
falsifying supporting documentation. The internal investigation was
conducted under the direction of the Companys audit committee
and was completed in March 2005. The Company cooperated fully with
the SEC. In a letter dated October 23, 2007, the Company received
notification from the SEC that it had completed its investigation
against the Company and was not recommending any enforcement action.
The Company and several former officers and/or directors of the Company or its
predecessor are defendants in a consolidated, putative class action proceeding (Roth v. OfficeMax
Inc., et. al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois) alleging violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint alleges, in summary, that the Company failed to
disclose (a) that vendor income had been improperly recorded, (b) that the Company lacked internal
controls necessary to ensure the proper reporting of revenue and compliance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and (c) that the Companys 2004 and later results would be adversely
affected by the Companys allegedly improper practices. The relief sought includes unspecified
compensatory damages, interest and costs, including attorneys fees. On September 21, 2005, the
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. On September 12, 2006,
the court granted the defendant groups joint motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint.
On November 9, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a purported amended complaint. On January 19, 2007, the
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On September 26, 2007, the court
granted the motion to dismiss and terminated the case.
18. Share Based Payments
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment using the
modified prospective transition method. Under SFAS 123R, the Company must record compensation
expense for all awards granted after the adoption date and for the unvested portion of previously
granted awards that remain outstanding at the adoption date, under the fair value method. Prior to
the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company recognized compensation expense for share-based awards to
employees using the fair-value-based guidance in SFAS 123. Due to the fact that the Company had
previously accounted for share-based awards using SFAS 123, the adoption of SFAS 123R did not have
a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
18
The Company sponsors several share-based compensation plans, which are described below.
Compensation costs related to the Companys share-based plans were $6.9 million and $21.3 million
for the quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2007, respectively. Compensation costs related
to the Companys share-based plans were $7.8 million and $18.1 million for the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Compensation expense is generally recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period of grants. The total income tax benefit recognized in
the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for share-based compensation arrangements was $2.7
million and $8.3 million for the quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2007, respectively.
The total income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for
share-based compensation arrangements was $3.0 million and $7.0 million for the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
2003 Director Stock Compensation Plan and OfficeMax Incentive and Performance Plan
In February 2003, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 2003 Director Stock
Compensation Plan (the 2003 DSCP) and the 2003 OfficeMax Incentive and Performance Plan (the
2003 Plan), which were approved by shareholders in April 2003.
A total of 57,187 shares of common stock is reserved for issuance under the 2003 DSCP. Prior
to December 8, 2005, the 2003 DSCP permitted non-employee directors to elect to receive some or all
of their annual retainer and meeting fees in the form of options to purchase shares of the
Companys common stock. Non-employee directors who elected to receive a portion of their
compensation in the form of stock options did not receive cash for that portion of their
compensation. The difference between the $2.50-per-share exercise price of the options and the
market value of the common stock on the date of grant was equal to the cash compensation that
participating directors elected to forego and was recognized as compensation
expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). On December 8, 2005, the Board of
Directors amended the 2003 DSCP to require the exercise price of any options issued to be fair
market value. On February 14, 2007, the Board of Directors amended the 2003 DSCP to eliminate the
choice to receive stock options. All options granted under the 2003 DSCP expire three years after
the holder ceases to be a director.
The 2003 Plan was effective January 1, 2003, and replaced the Key Executive Performance Plan
for Executive Officers, Key Executive Performance Plan for Key Executives/Key Managers, 1984 Key
Executive Stock Option Plan (KESOP), Key Executive Performance Unit Plan (KEPUP) and Director
Stock Option Plan (DSOP). No grants or awards have been made under the Key Executive Performance
Plans, KESOP, KEPUP, or DSOP since 2003 and no future grants or awards will be made under these
plans. A total of 5,208,024 shares of common stock is reserved for issuance under the 2003 Plan.
The Companys executive officers, key employees and nonemployee directors are eligible to receive
awards under the 2003 Plan at the discretion of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors. Eight types of awards may be granted under the 2003 Plan, including stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, performance
shares, annual incentive awards and stock bonus awards.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
In
the first nine months of 2007, the Company granted to employees and
independent directors 765,731
restricted stock units (RSUs). The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the RSUs was $50.84.
As of September 29, 2007, 713,457 of these RSUs remained outstanding which vest after defined
service periods as follows: 23,778 units in 2008, 344,840 in 2009 and 344,839 in 2010. The
remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to this grant, net of estimated
forfeitures, is $22 million.
In 2006, the Company granted to employees and independent directors 1,157,479 RSUs. The weighted-average
grant-date fair value of the RSUs was $28.79. As of September 29, 2007, 971,720 of these RSUs
remained outstanding which vest after defined service periods as follows: 10,808 units in 2007,
480,456 in 2008 and 480,456 in 2009. The remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to
this grant, net of estimated forfeitures, is approximately $12 million.
In 2005, the Company granted to employees and independent directors 728,123 RSUs. The weighted-average
grant-date fair value of the RSUs was $33.15. As of September 29, 2007, 81,566 of these RSUs
remained outstanding, which vest after defined service periods as follows: 29,666 units in 2007,
45,900 units in 2008 and 3,000 units in both 2009 and 2010. The remaining compensation expense to
be recognized related to this grant, net of estimated forfeitures, is $0.3 million.
19
In 2004, the Company granted 14,765 shares of restricted stock to nonemployee directors. The
restricted stock granted to directors vests nine months from their termination or retirement from
board service, and 7,170 of these restricted stock shares remain outstanding at September 29, 2007.
Shares of restricted stock are restricted until they vest and cannot be sold by the recipient
until the restriction has lapsed. RSUs are restricted until they vest and are convertible into one
common share after the restriction has lapsed. No entries are made in the financial statements on
the grant date of restricted stock and RSU awards. The Company recognizes compensation expense
related to these awards over the vesting periods based on the closing prices of the Companys
common stock on the grant dates. If these awards contain performance criteria, management
periodically reviews actual performance against the criteria and adjusts compensation expense
accordingly. For the quarter and nine months ended September 29, 2007, the Company recognized $6.8
million and $20.9 million, respectively, of pretax compensation expense and additional paid-in
capital related to restricted stock and RSU awards. For the quarter and nine months ended September
30, 2006, the Company recognized $7.6 million and $17.7 million, respectively, of pretax
compensation expense and additional paid-in capital related to restricted stock and RSU awards.
Restricted shares and RSUs are not included as shares outstanding in the calculation of basic
earnings per share, but are included in the number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per
share, if dilutive. When the restriction lapses on restricted stock, the par value of the stock is
reclassified from additional paid-in-capital to common stock. When the restriction lapses on RSUs,
the units are converted to unrestricted common shares, and the par value of the stock is
reclassified from additional paid-in-capital to common stock. Unrestricted shares are included in
shares outstanding for purposes of calculating both basic and diluted earnings per share.
Restricted stock and RSUs may be eligible to receive all
dividends declared on the Companys common shares during the vesting period; however, such
dividends are not paid until the restrictions lapse.
Stock Units
The Company has a shareholder approved deferred compensation program for certain of its
executive officers that allows them to defer a portion of their cash compensation. Previously,
these officers could allocate their deferrals to a stock unit account. The Company matched
deferrals used to purchase stock units with a 25% Company allocation of stock units. As a result of
an amendment to the plan, no additional deferrals can be allocated to the stock unit accounts. At
September 29, 2007, 12,789 stock units were allocated to the accounts of executive officers. A
stock unit is equal in value to one share of the Companys common stock. The value of deferred
stock unit accounts is paid in shares of the Companys common stock when an officer retires or
terminates employment.
Stock Options
In addition to the 2003 DSCP and the 2003 Plan discussed above, the Company has the following
shareholder-approved stock option plans: the Key Executive Stock Option Plan (KESOP), the
Director Stock Option Plan (DSOP) and the Director Stock Compensation Plan (DSCP). No further
grants will be made under the KESOP, DSOP and DSCP.
The KESOP provided for the grant of options to purchase shares of common stock to key
employees of the Company. The exercise price of awards under the KESOP was equal to the fair market
value of the Companys common stock on the date the options were granted. Options granted under the
KESOP expire, at the latest, ten years and one day following the grant date.
The DSOP, which was available only to nonemployee directors, provided for annual grants of
options. The exercise price of awards under the DSOP was equal to the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date the options were granted. The options granted under the DSOP
expire upon the earlier of three years after the director ceases to be a director or ten years
after the grant date.
The DSCP permitted nonemployee directors to elect to receive grants of options to purchase
shares of the Companys common stock in lieu of cash compensation. The difference between the
$2.50-per-share exercise price of DSCP options and the market value of the common stock subject to
the options was intended to offset the cash compensation that participating directors elected not
to receive. Options granted under the DSCP expire three years after the holder ceases to be a
director.
20
Under the KESOP and DSOP, options may not, except under unusual circumstances, be exercised
until one year following the grant date. Under the DSCP, options may be exercised nine months after
the grant date.
A summary of stock option activity for the quarters ended September 29, 2007 and September 30,
2006 is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Avg. |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
1,753,188 |
|
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
|
5,759,545 |
|
|
$ |
32.39 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
31.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(185,563 |
) |
|
|
31.53 |
|
|
|
(3,454,784 |
) |
|
|
32.71 |
|
Options forfeited and expired |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
36.88 |
|
|
|
(12,500 |
) |
|
|
37.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
1,600,975 |
|
|
$ |
31.83 |
|
|
|
2,292,261 |
|
|
$ |
31.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
1,397,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,044,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides summarized information about stock options outstanding at
September 29, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
$2.50 |
|
|
11,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
|
11,171 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
$18.00$28.00 |
|
|
571,944 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
27.65 |
|
|
|
571,944 |
|
|
|
27.65 |
|
$28.01$39.00 |
|
|
1,017,860 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
34.49 |
|
|
|
814,728 |
|
|
|
35.08 |
|
The remaining compensation expense to be recognized related to outstanding stock options,
net of estimated forfeitures, is approximately $0.7 million. At September 29, 2007, the aggregate
intrinsic value of outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options was $5.1 million and
$4.7 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic
value (i.e. the difference between the Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of the
third quarter of 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the quantities of in-the-money options
at the end of the quarter).
21
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Summary
The following discussion contains statements about our future financial performance. These
statements are only predictions. Our actual results may differ materially from these predictions.
In evaluating these statements, you should review Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Form
10-Q, including Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements.
Financial Performance
Our results for 2007 and 2006 included various items related to the Companys previously
announced restructuring activities and our transition from a commodity
manufacturing-based company to an independent office products distribution company, which are not
expected to be ongoing, including the following:
|
|
|
Results for the first nine months of 2007 included a loss from a sale of OfficeMax,
Contracts operations in Mexico. These operations were sold to OfficeMax de Mexico, our 51%
owned joint venture that operates OfficeMax stores in Mexico. The net impact of the
transaction was a $1.1 million increase in minority interest, net of income tax, which is
included in the Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). |
|
|
|
|
In the first nine months of 2006, we recorded pre-tax charges of $89.5 million related
to the closing of 109 retail stores, $7.9 million related to the reorganization of our
contract segment and $38.1 million related to the consolidation of our corporate
headquarters, respectively. These charges were included in Other operating (income)
expense, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and were reflected in the
Retail segment (store closures), Contract segment (reorganization) and the Corporate and
Other segment (headquarters consolidation), respectively. See sub-caption Integration
Activities and Facility Closures below for additional information regarding the store
closures and the headquarters consolidation. |
|
|
|
|
In the first nine months of 2006, we recognized an $11 million loss from discontinued
operations related to a manufacturing facility near Elma, Washington. See sub-caption
Discontinued Operations below for more information regarding the loss from discontinued
operations. |
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2006, we reduced a liability related to the Additional
Consideration Agreement that was entered into in connection with the sale of the paper,
forest products and timberland assets, which resulted in a credit to Other, income
(expense), net (non-operating) of $9.2 million. |
We evaluate our results of operations both before and after certain gains and losses that
management believes are not indicative of our core operating
activities, such as the items described above. We believe our
presentation of financial measures before, or excluding, these items, which are non-GAAP measures,
enhances our investors overall understanding of the impact of
the Companys restructuring activities and our recurring operational performance and provides
useful information to both investors and management to evaluate the ongoing operations and
prospects of OfficeMax by providing better comparisons and
information regarding significant trends and variability in our earnings. Whenever we use non-GAAP financial
measures, we designate those measures as
adjusted and provide a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most closely
applicable GAAP financial measure. Investors are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial
measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure.
Although we believe the non-GAAP financial measures enhance an investors understanding of our
performance, our management does not itself, nor does it suggest that investors should, consider
such non-GAAP financial measures in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information
prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures we use may not be consistent with
the presentation of similar companies in our industry. However, we present such non-GAAP financial
measures in reporting our financial results to provide investors with an additional tool to
evaluate our operating results in a manner that focuses on what we believe to be our ongoing
business operations. In addition, use of the non-GAAP measures that exclude certain gains and losses is not
intended to suggest that our future financial results will not be impacted by additional unusual
items.
22
The
following tables summarize the impact of the gains and losses
summarized above on our results of
operations for 2007 and 2006 and provide a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to the
corresponding GAAP measure. Both GAAP and non-GAAP measures are used throughout this Managements
Discussion and Analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Special |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OfficeMax, Contract |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
(a) |
|
$ |
45.7 |
|
OfficeMax, Retail |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(30.3 |
) |
|
|
11.5 |
(c) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OfficeMax, Contract |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
OfficeMax, Retail |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Consolidated |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before
income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
72.6 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) (g) |
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before
minority interest |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
Minority interest, net of income tax |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31.4 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29 , 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Special |
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
Special |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OfficeMax, Contract |
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
$ |
149.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
(a) |
|
$ |
157.2 |
|
OfficeMax, Retail |
|
|
134.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134.6 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
(b) |
|
|
133.5 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.2 |
) |
|
|
(92.8 |
) |
|
|
38.1 |
(c) |
|
|
(54.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
256.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256.3 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
|
236.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OfficeMax, Contract |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
OfficeMax, Retail |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Consolidated |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(91.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91.3 |
) |
|
|
(92.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92.3 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) (d) |
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
225.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225.8 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
203.8 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(85.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85.7 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) (g) |
|
|
(78.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before minority interest |
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
Minority interest, net of income tax |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
(e) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
18.0 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
Write-down of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
135.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
137.0 |
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
88.1 |
|
|
$ |
121.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Charges associated with the reorganization of our Contract
segment included in Contract segment operating expenses. |
|
(b) |
|
Charges associated with the closing of 109 retail stores
included in Retail segment operating expenses. |
|
(c) |
|
Charges associated with the consolidation of our corporate
headquarters included in Corporate and Other segment operating
expenses. |
|
(d) |
|
Income related to the Additional Consideration Agreement
adjustment included in interest income and other. |
|
(e) |
|
Loss from a sale of OfficeMax, Contracts operations in
Mexico included in minority interest, net of income tax. |
|
(f) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations related to a manufacturing facility near Elma,
Washington. |
|
(g) |
|
Income tax effect of special items. |
24
Results of Operations, Consolidated
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
2,315.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,244.4 |
|
|
$ |
6,883.9 |
|
|
$ |
6,708.9 |
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and minority
interest |
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
|
$ |
53.2 |
|
|
$ |
225.7 |
|
|
$ |
77.5 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
|
$ |
31.4 |
|
|
$ |
135.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common share |
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(percentage of sales)
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
25.8 |
% |
Operating and selling expenses |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Sales for the third quarter of 2007 increased 3.2% to $2,315.2 million from $2,244.4
million for the third quarter of 2006. Year-to-date, sales increased 2.6% to $6,883.9 million in
2007 from $6,708.9 million in 2006. The year-over-year sales increases reflect same-location sales
growth for both our Contract and Retail segments as well as the impact of new stores. For more
information about our segment results, see the discussion of segment results below.
Gross profit margin declined 0.7% of sales to 25.4% of sales for the third quarter of 2007
compared to 26.1% of sales in the previous year. The gross margin decrease for the third quarter of
2007 compared to the prior year reflects lower gross margins in both our Contract and Retail
segments. Gross profit margin declined 0.4% of sales to 25.4% of sales for the first nine months of
2007 compared to 25.8% of sales in the previous year. The gross profit margin decrease for the
first nine months of 2007 compared to the previous year reflects lower gross margins in our
Contract segment while gross margins in our Retail segment were
unchanged.
Operating and selling expenses decreased by 0.3% of sales to 18.1% of sales in the third
quarter of 2007 from 18.4% of sales a year earlier. The improvements in operating and selling
expenses as a percent of sales in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the previous year were
primarily the result of a shift of expense to general and administrative, reduced incentive
compensation expense and lower marketing expenses in the Contract segment, partially offset by
higher store labor costs in the Retail segment and a write-off of software costs of $2.9 million in
our international operations. Year-to-date, operating and selling expenses decreased by 0.5% of
sales to 17.9% of sales in 2007 from 18.4% of sales a year earlier. The improvements in operating
and selling expenses as a percent of sales were primarily the result of lower incentive
compensation expense and a shift of expense to general and administrative in the Contract segment.
General and administrative expenses were 3.4% of sales for the third quarter of 2007 and 4.1%
of sales for the third quarter of 2006. General and administrative expenses were 3.8% of sales for
the first nine months of 2007 and 4.0% of sales for the first nine months of 2006. General and
administrative expenses as a percent of sales reflect lower incentive compensation expense and
legacy-related costs, partially offset by a shift in expense from operating and selling in the
Contract segment.
25
Other operating (income) expense, net includes dividends earned on our investment in
affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C., which were $1.5 million and $4.5 million for the third quarter
and first nine months of 2007, respectively, and $1.5 million and $4.4 million for the third
quarter and first nine months of 2006, respectively. In the third quarter of 2006, we
reported $17.9 million of expense in Other operating (income) expense, net which included
expenses of $7.9 million related to the Contract segment reorganization and $11.5 million related
to the headquarters consolidation. In the first nine months of 2006, we reported $131.2 million of
expense in Other operating (income) expense, net which included $89.5 million related to the 109
domestic store closures, $38.1 million related to the headquarters consolidation and the
aforementioned $7.9 million related to the reorganization of the Contract segment.
Interest expense was $31.2 million in the third quarter of 2007 versus $30.6 million for the
prior year. Year-to-date, interest expense was $91.3 million in 2007 and $92.3 million in 2006.
Both periods in 2007 include the write-off of deferred financing fees of $1.2 million on the
previous bank facility which was replaced in the third quarter of 2007 (See the caption Liquidity
and Capital Resources in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q). Interest expense includes interest related to the timber
securitization notes of approximately $20.1 million for the third quarters of 2007 and 2006 and
$60.4 million for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006. The interest expense associated with the
timber securitization notes is offset by interest income earned on the timber notes receivable of
approximately $20.6 million for the third quarters of 2007 and 2006 and $61.9 million for the first
nine months of 2007 and 2006. The interest income on the timber notes receivable is included in
interest income and is not netted against the related interest expense in our Consolidated
Statements of Income (Loss).
Excluding the interest income earned on the timber notes receivable, interest income was $1.2 million and $2.3 million for the quarters ended September 29,
2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively, and $4.7 million and $4.2 million for the nine months
ended September 29, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
Other income (expense), net (non-operating) was ($0.2) million and $(1.4) million for the
third quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively, and ($5.9) million and $3.2 million for the first
nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the first nine months of 2006, we reduced a
portion of the liability related to the Additional Consideration Agreement that was entered into in
connection with the sale of the paper, forest products and timberland assets, which resulted in a
credit to Other income (expense), net (non-operating) of $9.2 million. Other income (expense), net
(non-operating) also includes costs related to the receivable securitization program, which
amounted to ($0.3) million and ($2.8) million for the third quarters of 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and ($5.6) million and ($7.9) million for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Our effective tax rate attributable to continuing operations for the third quarter of 2007 was
36.1% compared to 38.0% for the comparable period of 2006. Year-to-date, our effective tax rate
attributable to continuing operations was 37.9% in 2007 compared to 38.1% in 2006. Income taxes for
both periods were affected by the impact of state income taxes, non-deductible expenses and the
mix of domestic and foreign sources of income.
As a result of the foregoing factors, net income for the third quarter of 2007 was $49.9
million, or $0.64 per diluted share, compared with a net income of $31.4 million, or $0.41 per
diluted share, for the third quarter of 2006. For the third quarter of 2006, excluding the
after-tax effect of charges associated
with the reorganization of our contract segment and our headquarters consolidation,
adjusted net income, which is a non-GAAP measure, was $43.2 million, or $0.56 per diluted share.
Net income for the first nine months of 2007 was $135.9 million, or $1.74 per diluted share,
compared with net income of $33.7 million, or $0.42 per diluted share, for the first nine months of
2006. For the first nine months of 2007, excluding the after-tax effect of a loss from the sale of
our Contract operations in Mexico to our joint venture in Mexico, adjusted net income, which is a
non-GAAP measure, was $137.0 million, or $1.76 per diluted share. For the first nine months of
2006, excluding the after-tax effect of charges associated
with the store closures, charges associated with our headquarters consolidation, the income
from the Additional Consideration Agreement adjustment, charges
associated with the reorganization of our contract segment and the
loss from discontinued operations related to the manufacturing
facility, adjusted net income, which is a non-GAAP measure, was $121.8
million, or $1.62 per diluted share.
26
OfficeMax, Contract
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,185.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,158.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,647.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,535.8 |
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
55.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
|
$ |
149.3 |
|
Sales by Product Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office supplies and paper |
|
$ |
662.8 |
|
|
$ |
635.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,034.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,919.0 |
|
Technology products |
|
$ |
374.5 |
|
|
$ |
378.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,170.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,167.9 |
|
Office furniture |
|
$ |
148.4 |
|
|
$ |
143.9 |
|
|
$ |
442.9 |
|
|
$ |
448.9 |
|
Sales by Geography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
870.4 |
|
|
$ |
887.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,699.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,671.6 |
|
International |
|
$ |
315.3 |
|
|
$ |
271.3 |
|
|
$ |
947.5 |
|
|
$ |
864.2 |
|
Sales growth |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Same-location sales growth |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(percentage of sales)
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
For the third quarter of 2007, Contract segment sales were $1,185.7 million, up 2.4% from
$1,158.3 million for the third quarter of 2006. For the first nine months of 2007, Contract segment
sales were $3,647.3 million, up 3.2% from $3,535.8 million for the first nine months of 2006. The
year-over-year sales growth in the third quarter reflects an increase
in sales from our International operations,
partially offset by a decline in sales from our United States operations. The sales growth for the first nine
months of 2007 was realized in both the United States and International operations, primarily in
large corporate accounts. Contract segment same-location sales increased 2.2% and 3.0%,
year-over-year during the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively. Same-location
sales growth excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates was (0.4)% and 1.4%,
year-over-year during the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively. Contract
sales growth was impacted by our initiative to terminate existing unprofitable contracts and be
more disciplined in new account acquisition.
Contract segment gross profit margin decreased 0.2% of sales year-over-year to 22.1% of sales
for the third quarter of 2007. Contract segment gross profit margin decreased 0.8% of sales
year-over-year to 21.8% of sales for the first nine months of 2007. The decreases in gross profit
margin were primarily due to the continued impact of new and renewing accounts with lower gross
margin rates and the impact of paper price increases.
Operating expenses for the Contract segment were 17.5% of sales for the third quarter of 2007,
down from 19.0% of sales for the third quarter of 2006. Operating expenses for the Contract segment
were 17.5% of sales for the first nine months of 2007, down from 18.4% in the prior year. Both
periods in 2006 include costs related to the Contract reorganization of $7.9 million. Excluding
these costs, adjusted operating expenses, which is a non-GAAP measure, for the Contract segment
were 18.4% of sales for the third quarter of 2006 and 18.1% of sales for the first nine months of
2006. The year-over-year improvements in operating expenses as a percentage of sales were the
result of targeted cost controls, including the reorganization of the Contract segment that we
began in the fourth quarter of 2006 and lower incentive compensation costs. The cost savings were
partially offset by a write-off of software of $2.9 million in our international operations.
Contract segment operating income increased to $55.0 million for the third quarter of 2007, or
4.6% of sales, compared to $37.8 million, or 3.3% of sales, for 2006. Contract segment operating
income increased to $155.9 million for the first nine months of 2007, or 4.3% of sales, compared to
$149.3 million, or 4.2% of sales, for 2006. Both periods in 2006 include costs related to the
Contract reorganization of $7.9 million. Excluding these costs, Contract segment adjusted operating
income, which is a non-GAAP measure, for the third quarter of 2006 was $45.7 million or 3.9% of
sales and $157.2 million or 4.4% of sales for the first nine months of 2006.
27
OfficeMax, Retail
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 29, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,129.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,086.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,236.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,173.1 |
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
$ |
45.3 |
|
|
$ |
54.8 |
|
|
$ |
134.6 |
|
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
Sales by Product Line |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office supplies and paper |
|
$ |
468.2 |
|
|
$ |
457.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,261.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,249.5 |
|
Technology products |
|
$ |
564.5 |
|
|
$ |
527.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,687.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,620.4 |
|
Office furniture |
|
$ |
96.8 |
|
|
$ |
101.4 |
|
|
$ |
287.6 |
|
|
$ |
303.2 |
|
Sales by Geography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,060.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,031.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,058.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,028.8 |
|
International |
|
$ |
68.9 |
|
|
$ |
54.8 |
|
|
$ |
178.0 |
|
|
$ |
144.3 |
|
Sales growth |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
Same-location sales growth |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(percentage of sales)
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
Operating expenses |
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
28.0 |
% |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Retail segment sales were $1,129.5 million for the third quarter of 2007 compared to
$1,086.1 million for the third quarter of 2006. Retail segment same-location sales increased 0.8%
year-over-year. During the third quarter of 2007, we opened nine new retail stores in the U.S. and
three new stores in Mexico. Since the third quarter of 2006, we opened forty-five new domestic
stores and fourteen new stores in Mexico.
Retail segment sales were $3,236.6 million for the first nine months of 2007 compared to
$3,173.1 million for the first nine months of 2007. Retail segment same-location sales increased
0.9% year-over-year. Adjusted for our initiative to eliminate mail-in-rebates and to provide
instant rebates in lieu of national vendor sponsored mail-in-rebates, same-location sales increased
approximately 1.9% year-over-year.
Retail segment gross margin decreased 1.2% of sales to 28.9% of sales for the third quarter of
2007, from 30.1% of sales for the comparable period of 2006. Retail segment gross margin was 29.4%
of sales for the first nine months of 2007 which was flat with the prior year. The gross
margin decline for the third quarter of 2007 compared to the previous year was primarily driven by
a change in sales-mix from higher margin categories, such as core office supplies and furniture
which had negative same-store sales reflecting a weakness in consumer
and small business spending,
to our technology category which had positive same-store sales, due primarily to our expanded
assortment of laptops and computers.
Retail segment operating expenses were 24.9% of sales for the third quarter of 2007 compared
to 25.1% for the third quarter of 2006. Operating expenses as a percent of sales for the third
quarter of 2007 benefited from reduced incentive compensation costs partially offset by higher
store labor costs.
Retail segment operating expenses were 25.2% of sales for the first nine months of 2007
compared to 28.0% for the comparable period of 2006. Excluding the impact of the store closing
charges, Retail segment adjusted operating expenses, which is a non-GAAP measure, were 25.2% of
sales for the first nine months of 2006.
For the third quarter of 2007, the Retail segment reported operating income of $45.3 million,
or 4.0% of sales, compared to operating income of $54.8 million, or 5.0% of sales, in 2006. For the
first nine months of 2007, Retail segment operating income was $134.6 million, or 4.2% of sales,
compared to operating income of $44.0 million, or 1.4% of sales, in 2006. Excluding the impact of
the store closing charges, Retail segment adjusted operating income, which is a non-GAAP measure,
for the first nine months of 2006 was $133.5 million, or 4.2% of sales.
28
Corporate and Other
Corporate and Other expenses were $10.0 million and $30.3 million in the third quarter of 2007
and 2006, respectively. Excluding the expenses related to headquarters consolidation, Corporate and
Other adjusted expenses, which is a non-GAAP measure, were $18.8 million for the third quarter of 2006. Corporate and Other expenses were
$34.2 million and $92.8 million for the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. Excluding
the expenses related to headquarters consolidation, Corporate and Other adjusted expenses, which is
a non-GAAP measure, were $54.7 million for the first nine months of 2006. The year-over-year
decreases in our Corporate and Other expenses were primarily due to lower incentive compensation
costs and legacy-related costs.
Discontinued Operations
In December 2004, the Companys board of directors authorized management to pursue the
divestiture of a facility near Elma, Washington that manufactured integrated wood-polymer building
materials. The board of directors and management concluded that the operations of the facility were
no longer consistent with the Companys strategic direction. As a result of that decision, the
Company recorded the facilitys assets as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the
results of its operations and planned divestiture as discontinued operations.
During 2005, the Company experienced unexpected difficulties in achieving anticipated levels
of production at the facility. These issues delayed the process of identifying and qualifying a
buyer for the business and as a result, the Company concluded that it was unable to attract a buyer
in the near term and elected to cease operations at the facility during the first quarter of 2006.
During the first quarter of 2006, we recorded pre-tax expenses of $18.0 million for contract
termination and other closure costs. These charges and expenses were reflected within discontinued
operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Integration Activities and Facility Closures
In September 2005, the board of directors approved a plan to relocate and consolidate the
Companys retail headquarters in Shaker Heights, Ohio and its existing corporate headquarters in
Itasca, Illinois into a new facility in Naperville, Illinois. The Company began the consolidation
and relocation process in the latter half of 2005. During the third quarter and first nine months
of 2006, the Company incurred and expensed approximately $11.5 million and $38.1 million,
respectively, of costs related to the headquarters consolidation, all of which were reflected in
the Corporate and Other segment. The consolidation and relocation process was completed during the
second half of 2006.
During the first nine months of 2006, the Company closed 109 underperforming domestic retail
stores and recorded a pre-tax charge of $89.5 million ($11.3 million for employee severance, asset
write-off and impairment and other closure costs and $78.2 million for estimated future lease
obligations). Also, during the third quarter of 2006, the Company announced the reorganization of
our Contract segment and recorded a pre-tax charge of $7.9 million for employee severance.
At September 29, 2007, approximately $31.3 million of the reserve for integration and facility
closures was included in accrued liabilities, other, and $51.8 million was included in other
long-term liabilities. At September 29, 2007, the integration and facility closure reserve included
approximately $78.2 million for estimated future lease obligations, which represents the estimated
net present value of the lease obligations and is net of anticipated future sublease income of
approximately $86.7 million.
29
Integration and facility closure reserve account activity during the first nine months of 2007
and 2006, including the headquarters consolidation, the 2006 store closures and the Contract
segment reorganization, as well as other previously disclosed integration and facility closure
activities, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Severance\ |
|
|
Write-off & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Retention |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Balance at December 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
107,824 |
|
|
$ |
10,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,142 |
|
|
$ |
121,804 |
|
Charges to income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to estimated costs
included in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(32,455 |
) |
|
|
(7,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
(41,573 |
) |
Non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 29, 2007 |
|
$ |
78,194 |
|
|
$ |
3,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
83,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease\ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Severance\ |
|
|
Write-off & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Retention |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
91,455 |
|
|
$ |
21,502 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
113,696 |
|
Charges to income |
|
|
81,830 |
|
|
|
18,801 |
|
|
|
9,089 |
|
|
|
25,792 |
|
|
|
135,512 |
|
Change in goodwill |
|
|
(11,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,000 |
) |
Changes to estimated costs
included in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
(55,572 |
) |
|
|
(24,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,988 |
) |
|
|
(98,368 |
) |
Non-cash charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,089 |
) |
|
|
(5,978 |
) |
|
|
(15,067 |
) |
Accretion |
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
111,563 |
|
|
$ |
14,415 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,565 |
|
|
$ |
128,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 29, 2007, we had $147.4 million of cash and cash equivalents and $384.4
million of short-term and long-term debt, excluding the $1.5 billion of timber securitization
notes. We also had $22.4 million of restricted investments on deposit which are pledged to secure a
portion of the outstanding debt. As of December 30, 2006, we had $282.1 million of cash and cash
equivalents, $22.3 million of restricted investments and $409.9 million of short-term and long-term
debt, excluding the $1.5 billion of timber securitization notes.
Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 1.47:1 at September 29, 2007, compared
with 1.37:1 at December 30, 2006. The increase in our ratio of current assets to current
liabilities at September 29, 2007 resulted primarily from an increase in accounts receivable due to
the termination of our accounts receivable securitization program and a seasonal decrease in
accounts payable in the first nine months of 2007.
The Companys primary ongoing cash requirements relate to working capital, expenditures for
property and equipment, lease obligations and debt service. The Company expects to fund these
requirements through a combination of cash flow from operations and seasonal borrowings under our
revolving credit facility. The sections that follow discuss in more detail our operating,
investing, and financing activities, as well as our financing arrangements.
30
Operating Activities
The Companys operating activities generated $31.5 million of cash during the first nine
months of 2007 and $339.8 million of cash during the first nine months of 2006. For the first nine
months of 2007, items included in net income (loss) provided $262.6 million of cash, and changes in
working capital used $231.1 million, principally due to the termination of our accounts receivable
securitization program and a reduction in accounts payable primarily due to lower inventory
levels and reduced terms at a few key suppliers, partially offset by $82 million of cash proceeds
realized from the monetization of certain company-owned life insurance assets. For the first nine months of 2006, items included
in net income (loss) provided $173.1 million of cash, and changes in working capital provided
$166.7 million, primarily due to the reduction in inventories as a result of closing 109 retail
stores during the period.
Investment Activities
The Companys investing activities used $102.1 million of cash during the first nine months of
2007, compared to $92.3 million during the first nine months of 2006. Investment activities during
the first nine months of 2007 were primarily expenditures for property and equipment. The Company
expects expenditures for property and equipment in 2007 to total between $140 and $160 million,
excluding acquisitions, if any. The Companys capital spending in 2007 is expected to be for leasehold
improvements, new stores, quality and efficiency projects, replacement projects and integration
projects.
Financing Activities
Our financing activities used $65.4 million of cash during the first nine months of 2007,
compared with $5.9 million during the first nine months of 2006. Dividend payments totaled $35.8
million and $34.4 million during the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. In both
years, the Companys quarterly dividend was 15 cents per common share. During the first nine months
of 2007, the Company used $25.5 million of cash to reduce debt as compared to $84.1 million for the
same period in 2006. During the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, the Company realized $5.9
million and $112.7 million, respectively, from the exercise of stock options. Excluding the timber
securitization notes, our debt-to-equity ratio was .18:1 at September 29, 2007 and .21:1 at
December 30, 2006.
Our debt structure consists of credit agreements, note agreements and other borrowings.
Information regarding our debt structure is included below. For additional information, see Note
13, Debt, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30,
2006.
Credit Agreements
On July 12, 2007, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement
(the Loan Agreement) with a group of banks. The Loan Agreement amended the Companys existing
revolving credit facility and replaced the Companys accounts receivable securitization program.
The new Loan Agreement permits the Company to borrow up to a maximum of $700 million in accordance
with a borrowing base calculation equal to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable plus a
percentage of the value of eligible inventory less certain reserves. The Loan Agreement may be
increased (up to a maximum of $800 million) at the Companys request or reduced from time to time,
in each case according to terms detailed in the Loan Agreement. There were no borrowings
outstanding under the revolver as of September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006. Letters of credit,
which may be issued under the revolver up to a maximum of $250 million, reduce available borrowing
capacity under the revolving credit facility. Letters of credit issued under the revolver totaled
$82.3 million as of September 29, 2007 and $75.5 million as of December 30, 2006. As of September
29, 2007, the maximum aggregate borrowing amount available under the revolver was $700.0 million
and excess availability under the revolver totaled $617.7 million.
Borrowings under the revolver bear interest at rates based on either the prime rate or the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Margins are applied to the applicable borrowing rates and
letter of credit fees under the revolver depending on the level of average excess availability.
Fees on letters of credit issued under the revolver were charged at a weighted average rate of
0.875% during the third quarter of 2007. The Company is also charged an unused line fee of 0.25% on
the amount by which the maximum available credit exceeds the average daily outstanding borrowings
and letters of credit.
31
Timber Notes
In October 2004, the Company sold its timberlands and received credit-enhanced timber
installment notes receivable in the amount of $1,635 million. In December 2004, the Company
completed a securitization transaction in which its interest in the timber installment notes
receivable and related guarantees were transferred to wholly-owned bankruptcy remote subsidiaries
that were designated to be qualifying special purpose entities (the OMXQs). The OMXQs pledged the
timber installment notes receivable and related guarantees and issued securitization notes in the
amount of $1,470 million. Recourse
on the securitization notes is limited to the pledged timber installment notes receivable. The
securitization notes are 15-year non-amortizing, and were issued in two equal $735 million tranches
paying interest of 5.42% and 5.54%, respectively.
As a result of these transactions, OfficeMax received $1,470 million in cash from the OMXQs,
and over 15 years will earn approximately $82.5 million per year in interest income on the timber
installment notes receivable and incur interest expense of approximately $80.5 million on the
securitization notes. The pledged timber installment notes receivable and nonrecourse
securitization notes will mature in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The securitization notes have an
initial term that is approximately three months shorter than the installment notes. The Company
expects to refinance its ownership of the installment notes in 2019 with a short-term secured
borrowing to bridge the period from initial maturity of the securitization notes to the maturity of
the installment notes.
The original entities issuing the credit enhanced timber installment notes are
variable-interest entities (the VIEs) under FASB Interpretation 46R, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. The OMXQs are considered to be the primary beneficiary, and therefore, the
VIEs are required to be consolidated with the OMXQs, which are also the issuers of the
securitization notes. As a result, the accounts of the OMXQs have been consolidated into those of
their ultimate parent, OfficeMax. The effect of the Companys consolidation of the OMXQs is that
the securitization transaction is treated as a financing, and both the timber notes receivable and
the securitization notes payable are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Note Agreements
In October 2003, the Company issued $300 million of 6.50% senior notes due in 2010 and $200
million of 7.00% senior notes due in 2013. At the time of issuance, the senior note indentures
contained a number of restrictive covenants, substantially all of which have been eliminated
through the execution of supplemental indentures as described below. On November 5, 2004, the
Company repurchased approximately $286.3 million of the 6.50% senior notes and received the
requisite consents to adopt amendments to the indenture pursuant to a tender offer for these
securities. As a result, the Company and the trustee executed a supplemental indenture that
eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants, certain events of default and related
provisions, and replaced them with the covenants contained in the Companys other public debt.
Those covenants include a limitation on mergers and similar transactions, a restriction on secured
transactions involving Principal Properties, as defined, and a restriction on sale and leaseback
transactions involving Principal Properties.
On December 23, 2004, both Moodys Investors Service, Inc., and Standard & Poors Rating
Services upgraded the credit rating on the Companys 7.00% senior notes to investment grade. The
upgrades were the result of actions the Company took to collateralize the notes by granting the
note holders a security interest in $113 million in principal amount of General Electric Capital
and Bank of America Corp. notes maturing in 2008 (the pledged instruments). These pledged
instruments are reflected as restricted investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result
of these ratings upgrades, the original 7.00% senior note covenants have been replaced with the
covenants found in the Companys other public debt. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company
purchased and cancelled $87.3 million of the 7.00% senior notes. As a result, $92.8 million of the
pledged instruments were released from the security interest granted to the 7.00% senior note
holders, and were sold during the second quarter of 2005. The remaining pledged instruments
continue to be subject to the security interest, and are reflected as restricted investments in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Other
The Company had leased certain equipment at its integrated wood-polymer building materials
facility near Elma, Washington under a capital lease. The lease agreement had a base term of seven
years and an interest rate of 4.67%. During the first quarter of 2006 the Company paid $29.1
million to terminate the lease agreement.
Cash payments for interest were $5.7 million and $26.4 million for the quarter and nine months
ended September 29, 2007, respectively, and $5.3 million and $27.1 million for the quarter and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
32
Contractual Obligations
For information regarding contractual obligations, see the caption Contractual Obligations
in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 30, 2006. In addition, in the third quarter of 2007, the Company
entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, see
Note 13, Debt, of Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited) in this Form 10-Q.
Off-Balance-Sheet Activities and Guarantees
For information regarding off-balance-sheet activities and guarantees, see Note 9, Sales of
Accounts Receivable, of Notes to Quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) in this
Form 10-Q and the caption Off-Balance-Sheet Activities and Guarantees in Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006. On July 12, 2007, the Company
entered into an Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement. The Loan Agreement
amended the Companys existing revolving credit facility and
replaced the Companys accounts receivable securitization
program. The sold accounts receivable under the accounts receivable
securitization program at that date were refinanced with borrowings
under the new loan agreement and excess cash. The Company no longer
sells any of its accounts receivable.
Inflationary and Seasonal Influences
We believe that neither inflation nor deflation has had a material effect on our financial
condition or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance that we will not be affected
by inflation or deflation in the future. The Companys business is seasonal, with OfficeMax, Retail
showing a more pronounced seasonal trend than OfficeMax, Contract. Sales in the second quarter and
summer months are historically the slowest of the year. Sales are stronger during the first, third
and fourth quarters that include the important new-year office supply restocking month of January,
the back-to-school period and the holiday selling season, respectively.
Environmental
For information regarding environmental issues, see the caption Environmental in Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006.
Critical Accounting Estimates
For information regarding critical accounting estimates, see the caption Critical Accounting
Estimates in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding market risk see the caption Disclosures of Financial Market Risk
in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006. At September 29,
2007, other than a change in the average market price per ton of the benchmark paper grade used to
calculate payments under the Additional Consideration Agreement with Boise Cascade L.L.C.,
described below, there had not been a material change to the information regarding market risk
disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006.
Pursuant to an Additional Consideration Agreement between OfficeMax and Boise Cascade, L.L.C.,
we may be required to make substantial cash payments to, or receive substantial cash payments from,
Boise Cascade, L.L.C. Under the Additional Consideration Agreement, the Sale proceeds may be
adjusted upward or downward based on paper prices during the six years following the Sale, subject
to annual and aggregate caps. Specifically, we have agreed to pay Boise Cascade, L.L.C. $710,000
for each dollar by which the average market price per ton of a specified benchmark grade of
cut-size office paper during any 12-month period ending on September 30 is less than $800. Boise
Cascade, L.L.C. has agreed to pay us $710,000 for each dollar by which the average market price per
ton exceeds $920. Under the terms of the agreement, neither
party will be obligated to make a payment in excess of $45 million in any one year. Payments
by either party are also subject to an aggregate cap of $125 million that declines to $115 million
in the fifth year and $105 million in the sixth year.
33
We record changes in the fair value of the Additional Consideration Agreement in our net
income (loss) in the period they occur; however, any potential payments from Boise Cascade, L.L.C.
to us are not recorded in net income (loss) until all contingencies have been satisfied, which is
generally at the end of a 12-month measurement period ending on September 30. As of September 30,
2007, the last day of the third 12-month measurement period, the average market price per ton of the
benchmark grade used to calculate payments due under the Additional Consideration Agreement was
$966. Based on this price, we expect to receive a payment of approximately $33 million from Boise
Cascade L.L.C. and we will recognize income of $33 million in the fourth quarter of 2007. As of
September 29, 2007 and December 30, 2006, the net amount recognized in our Consolidated Balance
Sheet related to the Additional Consideration Agreement (either receivable or payable) was zero.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, these officers have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures are effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be
included in this quarterly report is made known to them by others on a timely basis and that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-1(f) of the Exchange Act, during the most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
34
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of
our business. In the opinion of management, our recovery, if any, or our liability, if any, under
pending litigation or administrative proceedings would not materially affect our financial position
or results of operations. For information concerning legal
proceedings and contingencies, see Item 3. Legal
Proceedings and Note 19, Legal Proceedings and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2006 and Item 16. Legal Proceedings and
Contingencies in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. In June 2005, the
Company announced that the SEC issued a formal order of investigation
arising from the Companys previously announced internal
investigation into its accounting for vendor income. The Company
launched its internal investigation in December 2004 when the Company
received claims by a vendor to its retail business that certain
employees acted inappropriately in requesting promotional payments
and in falsifying supporting documentation. The internal
investigation was conducted under the direction of the Companys
audit committee and was completed in March 2005. The Company cooperated fully with the SEC. In a letter
dated October 23, 2007, the Company received
notification from the SEC that it had completed its investigation
against the Company and was not recommending any enforcement action.
The Company and several former officers and/or directors of the
Company or its predecessor are defendants in a consolidated, putative
class action proceeding (Roth v. OfficeMax Inc., et. al, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of Illinois) alleging violations of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Complaint alleges, in
summary, that the Company failed to disclose (a) that vendor income
had been improperly recorded, (b) that the Company lacked internal
controls necessary to ensure the proper reporting of revenue and
compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, and (c)
that the Companys 2004 and later results would be adversely
affected by the Companys allegedly improper practices. The relief
sought includes unspecified compensatory damages, interest and costs,
including attorneys fees. On September 21, 2005, the
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended
complaint. On September 12, 2006, the court granted the
defendant groups joint motion to dismiss the consolidated
amended complaint. On November 9, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a
purported amended complaint. On January 19, 2007, the defendants filed a
motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On September 26, 2007,
the court granted the motion to dismiss and terminated the case.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Cautionary and Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are
not historical or current facts, including statements about our expectations, anticipated financial
results and future business prospects, are forward-looking statements. You can identify these
statements by our use of words such as may, will, expect, believe, should, plan,
anticipate and other similar expressions. You can find examples of these statements throughout
this report, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. We cannot guarantee that our actual results will be consistent with the forward-looking
statements we make in this report. We have listed below some of the inherent risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those we project. We do
not assume an obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
Intense competition in our markets could harm our ability to maintain profitability. Domestic
and international office products markets are highly and increasingly competitive. Customers have
many options when purchasing office supplies and paper, print and document services, technology
products and solutions and office furniture. We compete with worldwide contract stationers, office
supply superstores, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, computer and electronics superstores,
Internet merchandisers, direct-mail distributors, discount retailers, drugstores, supermarkets and
thousands of local and regional contract stationers. In addition, an increasing number of
manufacturers of computer hardware, software and peripherals, including some of our suppliers, have
expanded their own direct marketing efforts. The other large office supply superstores have
increased their presence in our markets in recent years and are expected to continue to do so in
the future. In addition, many of our competitors have expanded their office products assortment,
and we expect they will continue to do so. In recent years, two package delivery companies have
established retail stores that compete directly with us for copy, printing, packaging and shipping
business, and offer a limited assortment of office products and services similar to the ones we
offer. We anticipate increasing competition from our two domestic office supply superstore
competitors and various other providers, including the two package delivery companies, for
print-for-pay and related services. Print-for-pay and related services have historically been a key
point of difference for OfficeMax stores and are expected to become an increasingly more important
part of our future strategies. Any or all of our competitors may become even more aggressive in the
future. Increased competition in the office products markets, together with increased advertising,
has heightened price awareness among end-users. Such heightened price awareness has led to margin
pressure on office products and impacted the results of both our Retail and Contract segments. In
addition to price, competition is also based on customer service, the quality and breadth of
product selection, and convenient locations. Some of our competitors are larger than us and have
greater financial resources, which affords them greater purchasing power, increased financial
flexibility and more capital resources for expansion and improvement, which may enable them to
compete more effectively than we can.
We may be unable to open and remodel stores successfully. Our business plans include the
opening and remodeling of a significant number of retail stores. For these plans to be successful,
we must identify and lease favorable store sites, develop remodeling plans, hire and train
associates and adapt management and systems to meet the needs of these operations. These tasks are
difficult to manage successfully. If we are not able to open and remodel stores as quickly as we
have planned, our future financial performance could be materially and adversely affected. Further,
we cannot ensure that the new or remodeled stores will achieve the sales or profit levels that we
anticipate. This is particularly true as we introduce different store designs, formats and sizes or
enter into new market areas. In particular, the Advantage prototype store format we intend to utilize for new and remodeled stores is new and there can be no assurance as to
whether or to what extent that format will be successful.
35
Economic conditions directly influence our operating results. Economic conditions, both
domestically and abroad, directly influence our operating results. Current and future economic
conditions, including the level of unemployment, energy costs and the financial condition and
growth prospects of our Contract customers may adversely affect our business and the results of our
operations.
Our quarterly operating results are subject to fluctuation. Our quarterly operating results
have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the future. Factors that may contribute to
these quarter-to-quarter fluctuations could include the effects of seasonality, our level of
advertising and marketing, new store openings, changes in product mix and competitors pricing.
These quarterly fluctuations could have an adverse effect on both our operating results and the
price of our common stock.
We may be unable to attract and retain qualified associates. We attempt to attract and retain
an appropriate level of personnel in both field operations and corporate functions. As a retailer,
we face the challenge of filling many positions at wage scales that are low, although appropriate
for our industry and in light of competitive factors. As a result, we face many external risks and
internal factors in meeting our labor needs, including competition for qualified personnel, overall
unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, as well as rising employee benefit costs, including
insurance costs and compensation programs. Changes in any of these factors, including especially a
shortage of available workforce in the areas in which we operate, could interfere with our ability
to adequately provide services to customers and result in increasing our labor costs, which could
have an adverse effect on our business and results of our operations.
We cannot assure that new associates will perform effectively. In conjunction with our
headquarters consolidation, we have hired approximately 600 new employees to replace existing
associates who did not relocate to the new headquarters. As a result, we now have a significant
number of associates with limited experience with OfficeMax performing key functions. Although we
have carefully selected and trained these associates, there is still a risk that institutional
knowledge may be lost and operations may be conducted less efficiently or effectively. Also, if we
are unable to continue to attract and retain qualified associates for our remaining open positions,
as well as train new associates and transition them smoothly into their roles, it could adversely
affect our operating results.
Our expanded offering of proprietary branded products may not improve our financial
performance and may expose us to product liability claims. Our product offering includes many
proprietary branded products. While we have focused on the quality of our proprietary branded
products, we rely on third-party manufacturers for these products. Such third party manufacturers
may prove to be unreliable, or the quality of our globally sourced products may not meet our
expectations. Furthermore, economic and political conditions in areas of the world where we source
such products may adversely affect the availability and cost of such products. In addition, our
proprietary branded products compete with other manufacturers branded items that we offer. As we
continue to increase the number and types of proprietary branded products that we sell, we may
adversely affect our relationships with our vendors, who may decide to reduce their product
offerings through OfficeMax and increase their product offerings through our competitors. Finally,
if any of our customers are harmed by our proprietary branded products, they may bring product
liability and other claims against us. Any of these circumstances could have an adverse effect on
our business and financial performance.
We are more leveraged than some of our competitors, which could adversely affect our business
plans. A relatively greater portion of our cash flow is used to service debt and other financial
obligations including leases. This reduces the funds we have available for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, new stores, store remodels and other purposes. Similarly, our
relatively greater leverage increases our vulnerability to, and limits our flexibility in planning
for, adverse economic and industry conditions and creates other competitive disadvantages compared
with other companies with relatively less leverage.
We cannot ensure new systems and technology will be implemented successfully. Our acquisition
of OfficeMax, Inc., in December 2003, required the integration and coordination of our existing
contract stationer systems with the retail systems of the acquired company. Integrating and
coordinating these systems has been complex and still requires a number of system enhancements and
conversions that, if not done properly, could divert the attention of our workforce during
development and implementation and constrain for some time our ability to provide the level of
service our customers demand. Also, when
implemented, the systems and technology enhancements may not provide the benefits anticipated
and could add costs and complications to our ongoing operations. A failure to effectively implement
changes to these systems or to realize the intended efficiencies could have an adverse effect on
our business and results of our operations.
36
We retained responsibility for certain liabilities of the paper, forest products and
timberland businesses we sold. These obligations include liabilities related to environmental, tax,
litigation and employee benefit matters. Some of these retained liabilities could turn out to be
significant, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Our exposure to these
liabilities could harm our ability to compete with other office products distributors, who would
not typically be subject to similar liabilities.
Our business may be adversely affected by the actions of and risks associated with our
third-party vendors. We are a reseller of other manufacturers branded items and are thereby
dependent on the availability and pricing of key products including ink, toner, paper and
technology products. As a reseller, we cannot control the supply, design, function or cost of many
of the products we offer for sale. Disruptions in the availability of these products may adversely
affect our sales and result in customer dissatisfaction. Further, we cannot control the cost of
manufacturers products and cost increases must either be passed along to our customers or will
result in erosion of our earnings. Failure to identify desirable products and make them available
to our customers when desired and at attractive prices could have an adverse effect on our business
and results of operations.
Our investment in Boise Cascade, L.L.C. subjects us to the risks associated with the paper and
forest products industry. When we sold our paper, forest products and timberland assets, we
purchased an equity interest in affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. In addition, we have an ongoing
obligation to purchase paper from an affiliate of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. These continuing interests
subject us to market risks associated with the paper and forest products industry. These industries
are subject to cyclical market pressures. Historical prices for products have been volatile, and
industry participants have limited influence over the timing and extent of price changes. The
relationship between supply and demand in these industries significantly affects product pricing.
Demand for building products is driven mainly by factors such as new construction and remodeling
rates, interest rates and weather. The supply of paper and building products fluctuates based on
manufacturing capacity, and excess capacity, both domestically and abroad, can result in
significant variations in product prices. The level of supply and demand for forest products will
affect the price we pay for paper. Our ability to realize the carrying value of our equity interest
in affiliates of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. is dependent upon many factors, including the operating
performance of Boise Cascade, L.L.C. and other market factors that may not be specific to Boise
Cascade, L.L.C., due in part to the fact that there is not a liquid market for our equity interest.
Our exposure to these risks could decrease our ability to compete effectively with our competitors,
who typically are not subject to such risks.
Compromises of customer debit and credit card data in 2004, regardless of the source of the
breach, may damage the OfficeMax brand and our reputation. Compromises of customer debit and credit
card data in 2004 were later tied to fraudulent transactions outside the U.S. While we have no
knowledge of a security breach at OfficeMax, it is possible that information security compromises
that involved OfficeMax customer data, including breaches that occurred at third party processors,
may damage our reputation. Such damage to our reputation could adversely affect our operating
results.
We have substantial business operations in states in which the regulatory environment is
particularly challenging. Our operations in California and other similar states expose us to many
regulations relating to the conduct of our business, including, without limitation, consumer
protection laws, advertising regulations, and employment and wage and hour regulations. This
regulatory environment requires the company to implement a heightened compliance effort and exposes
us to defense costs, possible fines and penalties, and liability to private parties for monetary
recoveries and attorneys fees, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business and
results of operations.
37
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits.
Required exhibits are listed in the Index to Exhibits and are incorporated by reference.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED
|
|
|
/s/ Don Civgin
|
|
|
Don Civgin |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(As Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Phillip DePaul
|
|
|
Phillip DePaul |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(As Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Date:
November 8, 2007
39
OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Filed With the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 29, 2007
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1.1(1) |
|
Certificate of Incorporation |
3.1.2(2) |
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation |
3.2(3) |
|
Bylaws, as amended October 20, 2006 |
10.1(4) |
|
Amended and Restated Loan and
Security Agreement by and among the Company, certain of its
subsidiaries who are also borrowers, certain of its subsidiaries who
are guarantors, certain lenders, and Wachovia Capital Finance
Corporation (Central), which will act as agent for the lenders
|
10.2(5) |
|
Form of 2007 Directors
Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
|
10.3(6) |
|
General Waiver and Release of
Claims between M. Rowsey and the Company
|
10.4(7) |
|
Letter Agreement dated
September 12, 2007 between Mr. Martin and the Company
|
10.5(8) |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement dated September 17, 2007 between the Company and Mr.
Martin
|
10.6(9) |
|
Nonstatutory Stock Option Award
Agreement dated September 17, 2007 between the Company and Mr.
Martin
|
10.7(10) |
|
Nondisclosure and Noncompetition
Agreement dated September 13, 2007 between the Company and Mr.
Martin
|
31.1* |
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2* |
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32* |
|
Section 906 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax Incorporated |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed with this Form 10-Q. |
|
(1) |
|
Exhibit 3.1.1 was filed under the same exhibit number in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
April 24, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(2) |
|
Exhibit 3.1.2 was filed under exhibit number 3.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 1, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(3) |
|
Exhibit 3.2 was filed under exhibit number 3.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 25, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(4) |
|
Exhibit 10.1 was filed under exhibit number 99.1 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(5) |
|
Exhibit 10.2 was filed under exhibit number 99.3 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(6) |
|
Exhibit 10.3 was filed under exhibit number 99.1 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 16, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(7) |
|
Exhibit 10.4 was filed under exhibit number 99.1 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(8) |
|
Exhibit 10.5 was filed under exhibit number 99.2 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(9) |
|
Exhibit 10.6 was filed under exhibit number 99.3 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(10) |
|
Exhibit 10.7 was filed under exhibit number 99.4 in our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2007 and is
incorporated herein by reference. |
40