Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed
by
Registrant x
Filed
by
a Party other than the Registrant o
Check
the
appropriate box:
x
Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
Definitive Proxy Statement
o
Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
(Name
of
Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name
of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
No fee required.
o Fee
computed on table below per
Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)
Total
fee paid:
o
Fee paid
previously with preliminary materials:
o
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form
or
Schedule and the date of its filing.
1)
Amount
previously paid:
2)
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
3)
Filing
party:
4)
Date
filed:
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
|
i
|
|
|
PROXY
STATEMENT
|
1
|
Voting
Securities
|
2
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
3
|
Proposal
1: Election of Directors
|
4
|
Corporate
Governance
|
6
|
Board
Meetings and Committees
|
6
|
Executive
Compensation
|
8
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
16
|
Relationship
with Independent Auditors
|
17
|
Independent
Auditor Fees
|
17
|
Audit
Committee Report
|
18
|
Proposal
2: Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to Increase
the
|
|
Authorized
Class A Common Stock
|
19
|
Miscellaneous
|
20
|
|
|
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
|
Appx.
A
|
Notice
Of Annual Meeting Of Stockholders
To
Be Held
August
22, 2008
To
the
Stockholders of Advanced Photonix, Inc.:
You
are
invited to attend the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting)
of Advanced Photonix, Inc., which will be held at our Michigan office, 2925
Boardwalk, Ann Arbor, Michigan, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on August 22,
2008, to consider the following matters:
|
(1)
|
The
election of the six directors nominated by the Board of Directors
to hold
office until the next Annual Meeting or until their respective successors
are duly elected and qualified. The persons nominated by the Board
are
Richard D. Kurtz, Robin F. Risser, Lance Brewer,
M. Scott Farese, Donald Pastor and Stephen P. Soltwedel;
|
|
(2)
|
The
adoption of the Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to
increase
the authorized Class A Common Stock of the Company from 50,000,000
shares
to 100,000,000 shares; and
|
|
(3) |
The
transaction of such other matters as may properly be brought before
the
Annual Meeting.
|
The
Board
of Directors has fixed the close of business on July 7, 2008 as the record
date
for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders who owned our common stock at the
close of business on July 7, 2008 will be entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Shares
of common stock can be voted at the Annual Meeting only if the holder is present
or represented by proxy.
The
Board
of Directors is soliciting the accompanying proxy to vote at our 2008 Annual
Meeting. Reference is made to the attached Proxy Statement for further
information with respect to the business to be transacted at the Annual
Meeting.
A
complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting shall
be
open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose relevant to the
Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten
days prior to the Annual Meeting, at our principal office, 2925 Boardwalk,
Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48104.
Stockholders
are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you expect
to
attend the Annual Meeting in person, please complete, date and sign the
accompanying proxy card and return it without delay in the enclosed postage
prepaid envelope. Your proxy will not be used if you are present and prefer
to
vote in person or if you revoke your proxy before its
exercise.
|
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
_____, 2008
|
ROBIN
F. RISSER
|
|
Secretary
|
Proxy
Statement
Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
August
22, 2008
This
Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies
by
the Board of Directors of Advanced Photonix, Inc. (the Board) a Delaware
corporation (the Company or we) for use at the 2008 Annual Meeting and for
any
adjournments or postponements thereof
to be
held at the Company’s Michigan office, 2925 Boardwalk, Ann Arbor, Michigan, at
10:00 a.m., Eastern time, on August 22, 2008, for the purposes set forth in
the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Notice). A Board
of
Directors’ proxy (the Proxy) for the Annual Meeting is enclosed, by means of
which you may vote as to the proposals described in this Proxy
Statement.
Two
proposals are scheduled for a vote at the Annual Meeting: (1) the election
of
the six directors named in this Proxy Statement to serve until the next Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and (2) the adoption of the Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized Class A Common
Stock.
The
Board
recommends a vote FOR
the
election of the six nominees to the Board and FOR
the
adoption
of the Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation as described in this Proxy Statement. All
Proxies that are properly completed, signed and returned to the Company prior
to
the Annual Meeting, and which have not been revoked, will be voted in accordance
with the stockholder’s
instructions contained in such Proxy. In the absence of instructions, shares
represented by such Proxy will be voted FOR
the
election of the six
nominees
to the Board and FOR
the
adoption
of the Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation as described herein. The Board is not aware
of any business to be presented at the Annual Meeting except the matters set
forth in the Notice and described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters
properly
come
before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying Proxy will
vote
on those matters in accordance with their discretion. A stockholder may vote
before the Annual Meeting by mail by filling in, signing and returning the
enclosed Proxy. A stockholder may vote “For” all the nominees to the Board of
Directors or may withhold authority to vote for any nominee(s) specified. With
respect to the adoption
of the Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation, a stockholder my vote “For” or “Against” or
abstain from voting which will have the same effect as a vote against the
proposal. A stockholder may vote at the Annual Meeting if he or she attends
the
meeting in person. Even
if you plan to attend the meeting, the Company recommends that you submit your
Proxy via the mail so that your vote will count if you later decide not to
attend the Annual Meeting.
A
stockholder
may
revoke or change his or her Proxy at any time before it is exercised by filing
with the Secretary of the Company at its offices at 2925 Boardwalk,
Ann
Arbor,
Michigan 48104, either a written notice of revocation or a duly executed Proxy
bearing a later date, or by appearing in person at the Annual Meeting and
expressing a desire to vote his or her shares in person. A stockholder may
receive more than one set of proxy materials, including multiple copies of
this
Proxy Statement and multiple Proxies. For example, if a stockholder holds shares
in more than one brokerage account, he or she may receive a separate proxy
card
for each brokerage account in which shares are held. If a stockholder is of
record and his or her shares are registered in more than one name, he will
receive more than one Proxy. Please
complete, sign, date and return each Proxy received to ensure that all shares
are voted.
This
Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice, Proxy and 2008 Annual Report to
Stockholders are being sent to Stockholders on or about July ___,
2008.
VOTING
SECURITIES
The
Company has fixed July 7, 2008 as the record date for the determination of
stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof. As of that date, the Company had
outstanding [______] shares of Class A Common Stock, $.001 par
value (the Common Stock). A quorum, representing a majority of the total
outstanding shares of Common Stock, must be established for the Annual Meeting
to be held and any action to be taken. The presence, in person or by proxy,
of
stockholders entitled to cast a majority of votes will constitute a quorum
for
the Annual Meeting. Holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to one vote
for
each share of Common Stock owned.
Brokers
holding shares for beneficial owners (shares held in “street name”) must vote
those shares according to the specific instructions they receive from beneficial
owners. If specific instructions are not received, brokers may vote those shares
in their discretion, depending on the type of proposal involved. In accordance
with the rules applicable to such voting by brokers, brokers will have
discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors and on Proposal
2.
For
Proposal 1, the six nominees for election as directors who receive the highest
number of “FOR” votes will be elected as directors. As
a
plurality of votes cast is required for the election of directors, abstentions
will have no effect on the outcome of the election. For
Proposal 2, the adoption
of the Amendment
to the Certificate of Incorporation must receive the “FOR” vote of a majority of
the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the matter. Abstentions will have
the
same effect as a vote against Proposal 2.
Votes
will be counted by the Company’s independent inspectors of election appointed
for the Annual Meeting. The Company will pay for the entire cost of preparing,
assembling, printing, soliciting and mailing Proxies. The Company will request
banks and brokers to solicit their customers who beneficially own shares listed
of record in names of nominees, and will reimburse banks and brokers for the
cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. In addition, our
directors and employees may solicit proxies in person, by telephone, by
Internet, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will
not
be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies, but the Company
has
engaged The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies
and provide related advice and informational support for a services fee and
the
reimbursement of customary disbursements that are not expected to exceed $7,500
in the aggregate. Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual
Meeting. Final voting results will be published in our Quarterly Report on
Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following
table
sets forth as of June 30, 2008 certain information concerning the holdings
of each person who was known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more
than five percent (5%) of the shares of Common Stock of the Company, by each
director and each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table
and
by all directors and officers as a group.
Name
& Address
of
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number
of
Shares
Owned
|
|
Shares
Underlying
Options/Warrants
(1)
|
|
Percent
of Class (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5%
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potomac
Capital Management LLC
825
Third Avenue, 33rd Floor
New
York, NY 10022
|
|
|
3,420,218
|
(3)
|
|
500,000
|
(4)
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smithfield
Fiduciary LLC
c/o
Highbridge Capital Management
9
West 57th
Street, 27th
Floor
New
York, NY 10019
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,276,234
|
(4)
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named
Executive Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
D. Kurtz
|
|
|
80,300
|
|
|
554,800
|
(5)
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Robin
F. Risser
|
|
|
918,333
|
|
|
92,500
|
(6)
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Steven
Williamson
|
|
|
1,862,667
|
|
|
100,500
|
(7)
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Lance
Brewer
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
80,000
|
(5)
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
M.
Scott Farese
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
439,000
|
(5)
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Donald
Pastor
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
80,000
|
(5)
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Stephen
P. Soltwedel
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
450,000
|
(5)
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
Directors
& Officers as a Group
|
|
|
2,721,100
|
|
|
1,796,800
|
(8)
|
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
1)
|
Represents
shares issuable pursuant to stock options and stock purchase warrants
that
are exercisable within 60 days of June 30,
2008.
|
|
2)
|
Represents
percentage of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock,
assuming the beneficial owner (and no other beneficial owner) exercises
all stock purchase warrants and stock options which are exercisable
within
60 days of June 30, 2008.
|
|
3)
|
Based
upon information set forth in an Information Statement on Schedule
13G
filed by the beneficial owner with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC).
|
|
4)
|
Represents
shares underlying stock purchase
warrants.
|
|
5)
|
Represents
shares underlying stock options.
|
|
6)
|
Includes
80,000
shares underlying stock options and 12,500 shares underlying stock
purchase warrants.
|
|
7)
|
Includes
80,000
shares underlying stock options and 20,500 shares underlying stock
purchase warrants.
|
|
8)
|
Includes
1,763,800
shares underlying stock options and 33,000 shares underlying stock
purchase warrants.
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Federal
securities laws require our executive officers and directors and persons owning
more than 10% of our Common Stock to file certain reports on ownership and
changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Based
on
a review of our records and other information, we believe that during the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2008, our executive officers, directors and persons holding
more than 10% of our Common Stock timely filed Section 16(a) reports except
for
reports on Form 4 covering purchases of shares by Steven Williamson on February
14, 2008 and February 21, 2008 and by Donald Pastor on February 19, 2008
and one late report by each of Messrs. Farese and Soltwedel covering an option
grant for services as a non-employee director.
PROPOSAL
1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
A
Board
of six (6) Directors of the Company is to be elected at the Annual Meeting,
each
to serve, subject to the provisions of the Company’s by-laws, until the next
Annual Meeting or until his successor is duly elected and qualified. It is
the
Board and management’s recommendation that the accompanying form of Proxy be
voted FOR
the
election of each of the six nominees named below, all of whom are currently
Directors of the Company and two of whom
are
currently executive officers of the Company. The Board believes that the
nominees named below are willing to serve as Directors, however, in the event
that any of the nominees should become unable or unwilling to serve as a
Director, the Proxy will be voted for the election of such person or persons
as
shall be designated by the Board pursuant to the recommendation of the Company’s
Nominating and Governance Committee. The nomination of each of the nominees
listed below was recommended by our Nominating and Governance Committee and
approved by the Board.
The
following persons
are
nominees for election as Directors:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position or Principal Occupation
|
|
Director Since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
D. Kurtz
|
|
56
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin
F. Risser
|
|
57
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lance
Brewer
|
|
50
|
|
Director
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.
Scott Farese
|
|
51
|
|
Director
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald
Pastor
|
|
54
|
|
Director
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen P. Soltwedel
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
|
2000
|
Set
forth
below is certain information relating to the Directors and executive officers
of
the Company. Directors serve annual
terms
until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are
duly
elected and qualified. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of
Directors.
Richard
D. Kurtz – Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer
Mr.
Kurtz
became a director of the Company in February 2000, was elected Chairman of
the
Board in July 2000, and was appointed Chief Executive Officer in February 2003.
In June 2006, Mr. Kurtz was appointed to serve as President of the Company.
Prior to joining the Company in February 2003, he was Director of Client
Services and Strategic Planning for Quantum Compliance Systems Inc. a privately
owned software company specializing in the development and installation of
Environmental Health and Safety Management systems. Prior to joining Quantum
in
June 2001, Mr. Kurtz served as Vice President of Sales and Marketing for
Filtertek Inc. an ESCO Technology company for more than thirteen years.
Robin
F. Risser – Chief Financial Officer and Director
Mr.
Risser joined the Company through the acquisition of Picometrix, Inc., and
was
appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company in May 2005 and became a
director of the Company in July 2005. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Risser
served as the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors
of
Picometrix, Inc. since 1992, the year in which he co-founded Picometrix. Mr.
Risser is also a member of the Optical Society of America. Mr. Risser has passed
the certified public accountant exam and holds an MBA from the University of
Michigan.
Lance
Brewer – Director
Mr.
Brewer became a director of the Company in July 2005. He is a partner at Brewer
& Brewer Law firm since 1989 the year in which he co-founded the firm.
Brewer & Brewer is headquartered in Newport Beach, California and
specializes in representation of financial institutions, business acquisitions
and litigation and insurance defense.
M.
Scott Farese - Director
Mr.
Farese became a director of the Company in August 1998. He is currently Chief
Executive Officer of Memacin, a firm specializing in the manufacturing of
dietary supplements and nutracueticals. Prior to founding Memacin, Mr. Farese
was President of Chelsea Investments, a firm specializing in facilitating
private investments in privately held companies. For the thirteen years prior
to
the establishment of Chelsea Investments, Mr. Farese was employed by Filtertek,
Inc., an ESCO Technology company, most recently holding the position of Business
Unit Director.
Donald
Pastor – Director
Mr.
Pastor became a director of the Company in July 2005 and is currently the
Executive Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer of Telephonics
Corporation where he has been employed since 1986. In addition, Mr. Pastor
serves as the Chief Executive Officer of TLSI, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Telephonics. For the past thirty years, Mr. Pastor has held a variety of
financial, administrative and operational positions in high technology and
defense related industries.
Stephen
P. Soltwedel - Director
Mr.
Soltwedel became a director of the Company in February 2000. In May 2007 he
retired as President of Filtertek, Inc., an ESCO Technology company where he
had
been employed since 1979 and
had
previously held the position of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Prior to joining Filtertek, Mr. Soltwedel was employed by the public
accounting firm of Baillies Denson Erickson & Smith in Lake Geneva,
Wisconsin.
Steven
Williamson (Age 53) - Chief Technology Officer
Mr.
Williamson joined the Company in May 2005 through the acquisition of Picometrix,
Inc. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williamson served as the President,
Chief
Technology Officer and a member of the board of directors of Picometrix, Inc.
since 1992, the year in which he co-founded Picometrix. Mr. Williamson earned
his B.A. in Physics (Optics) from the University of Rochester, has 35
publications in the field of ultra fast optics and optoelectronics and holds
twelve patents.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The
Company seeks to follow
best
practices in corporate governance in a manner that is in the best interests
of
our business and our stockholders. We are in compliance with the corporate
governance requirements imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the SEC and the
American Stock Exchange (AMEX) and will continue to review our policies and
practices to meet ongoing developments in this area.
Code
of Ethical Conduct
The
Company has adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct applicable to its President and
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial
Officer
(CFO) pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition the Company has
adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees and
Directors, including the officers listed above. Both Codes of Ethics are
published on the Company’s web site, www.advancedphotonix.com under the
“Corporate Governance” link on the Investors page. Both Codes of Ethics are also
available in print to any requesting stockholder. We will post any amendments
to
or waivers of either Code of Ethics on the Company’s website.
BOARD
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
Board
Meetings, Annual Meeting and Attendance of Directors
The
Board
of
Directors held four meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.
Each
person
who
served as a director during the 2008 fiscal year attended at least 75% or more
of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board held
while such person was a director, and (ii) the total number of meetings
held by all committees of the Board on which such person served while such
person was a member of such committee. As a matter of policy, members of the
Board are required to make every reasonable effort to attend the Annual Meeting.
All members of the Board attended the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Director
Independence
The
Board
has affirmatively determined that the following directors have no material
relationship with the Company and are independent within the meaning of Rule
10A-3 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Rule 10A-3) and within
the applicable AMEX definition of “independence”:
Lance
Brewer, M. Scott Farese, Donald Pastor and Stephen P. Soltwedel. Independent
directors receive no compensation from the Company for service on the Board
or
the Committees other than directors’ fees and non-discretionary awards granted
under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.
Executive
Sessions
As
required
by the
AMEX listing standards, our non-management directors meet in executive sessions
with only non-management directors present at least once annually.
Communications
with Directors
You
may
contact the entire Board of Directors, any Committee of the Board, the
non-management directors as a group or any individual director by calling the
Company’s hotline at 800-785-1003 (U.S. and Canada) which is administered by the
third
party
service provider, Lighthouse Services. Lighthouse Services collects all requests
for contact and delivers them to the appropriate director or group of directors.
The contact information for our hotline is also located on our website at
www.advancedphotonix.com under the “Investor Inquiries” link on the Investors
page. Stockholders are also welcome to communicate directly with the Board
at
the Company’s Annual Meeting.
Committees
of the Board
The
Board
has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee
and the Nominating and Governance Committee. All of the members of the Audit
Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance
Committee are independent directors within the applicable definitions of the
AMEX listing standards and Rule 10A-3. Each of the Committees has the authority
to retain independent advisors and consultants, with all fees and expenses
to be
paid by the Company. The charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation
Committee and the Nominating Governance Committee have been approved by the
Board of Directors and are posted on the Company’s website,
www.advancedphotonix.com under the “Corporate Governance” link on the Investors
page. The charters are also available in print to any requesting
stockholder.
As
set
forth in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee’s primary
responsibilities are to: (1) oversee the Company’s financial reporting
principles and policies including review of the financial reports and other
financial and related information released by the Company to the public, or
in
certain circumstances governmental bodies; (2) review the Company’s system
of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, business conduct and ethics
and legal compliance that management and the Board have established;
(3) review the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes;
(4) review and appraise with management the performance of the Company’s
independent auditors; and (5) provide an open avenue of communication
between the independent auditors and the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee
held four meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. During the
2008
fiscal year, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Farese, Pastor and
Soltwedel. The Board has determined that Donald Pastor and Stephen P. Soltwedel
qualify as “audit committee financial experts” under the regulations promulgated
by the SEC.
Compensation
Committee.
The
Compensation Committee evaluates directors and management compensation plans
as
well as the Company’s equity incentive plans. The Compensation Committee met
seven times during the 2008 fiscal year. The members of the Compensation
Committee are Messrs. Brewer, Farese, and Soltwedel. Pursuant to the
Compensation Committee Charter, the Committee is responsible for
(i) discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of
the Company’s executive officers and (ii) reviewing and approving an annual
report on executive compensation prepared by management for inclusion in the
Proxy Statement in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. The
Committee made recommendations concerning executive compensation for our
executive officers for the 2008 fiscal year which were approved by the
independent directors of the Board.
Nominating
and Governance Committee.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee identifies individuals qualified to become
members of the Board and its Committees and addresses the Company’s demands for
governance. The Nominating and Governance Committee held two meetings during
the
2008 fiscal year. The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are
Messrs. Brewer, Farese and Pastor.
The
Committee’s responsibilities include (i) identifying individuals qualified to
become Board members, (ii) recommending individuals to the Board as director
nominees and recommending directors to serve as members of the Board’s
committees, and (iii) developing and recommending to the Board a set of
Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Nomination
Procedures
The
Nominating & Governance Committee of the Board identifies, investigates and
recommends prospective directors to the Board with the goal of creating a
balance of knowledge, experience and diversity. In conducting this assessment,
the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, among other things, skills,
expertise, integrity, character, judgment, independence, corporate experience,
length of service, willingness to serve, conflicts and commitments (including,
among other things, the number of other public and private company boards on
which a director candidate serves), and such other factors as it deems
appropriate to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on
the
Company’s Board. The Committee also considers whether a prospective nominee has
appropriate business experience, as well as the ability to make independent,
analytical judgments, the ability to be an effective communicator and the
ability and willingness to devote the time and effort to be an effective and
contributing member of the Board.
In
the
case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the
Committee reviews such directors’ overall service to the Company during their
terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation and
quality of performance. Consideration of new director nominee candidates
typically involves a series of internal discussions, review of information
concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. The Committee
identifies potential new director candidates by recommendations from its
members, other Board members, Company management and stockholders, and may,
if
necessary or appropriate, utilize the services of a professional search
firm.
The
Nominating & Governance Committee considers recommendations for director
candidates submitted by stockholders using the same criteria that it applies
to
recommendations from the Committee members, directors and members of management.
In order to be considered, a recommendation from a stockholder must be submitted
to the Secretary of the Company in accordance with the director nomination
procedures set forth in our by-laws and the applicable rules of the SEC. See
the
section of this proxy under the heading “Proposals of
Stockholders.”
The
Company has not made any changes to the procedures by which stockholders may
recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors since the Company’s last
proxy statement.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This
Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information on the compensation
program in place for the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO),
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief Technology Officer (CTO) (together
the NEOs).
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives.
The
Company generally compensates its NEOs with a mix of base salary, bonus and
equity compensation designed to be competitive with the compensation offered
by
other companies who operate in similar industries.
Board
Process.
The
Compensation Committee reports to the Board of Directors (the Board) and is
responsible for setting and administering the Company’s compensation program and
policies as well as monitoring the Company’s compensation philosophy and
objectives.
In
advance of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews and recommends
to the Board for approval any compensation awards, including bonuses payable
for
the prior year and a “target” bonus (expressed as a percentage of base salary)
for the next fiscal year, to all executive officers, including the CEO, CFO
and
CTO and each person in senior management who has a total compensation level
greater than $100,000. Generally, on its own initiative the Compensation
Committee reviews the total compensation of the CEO, and, following discussions
with him, and other advisors where it deems appropriate, establishes the
compensation level to be recommended to the Board. With respect to the other
NEOs, the Compensation Committee may receive recommendations from the CEO (with
respect to all NEOs other than himself), and exercises its judgment in
establishing its recommendations to the Board taking into account such
recommendations and evaluations.
The
Compensation Committee has discretion to grant stock options and stock awards
to
the NEOs. In making such grants, the Compensation Committee considers the
long-term incentive practices of comparable companies, the goals of the
Company’s long term incentive program, recommendations of the CEO and as
applicable reports received from its independent compensation consultant.
The
Compensation Committee is composed of three directors, all of whom are
independent under the applicable AMEX definitions. The Compensation Committee
held seven meetings during the 2008 fiscal year. The Compensation Committee
reports to the Board on its actions and recommendations following each meeting
and is responsible for periodically updating the Board about Compensation
Committee activities and actions.
Compensation
Setting Principles and Methodologies. For
purposes of establishing the overall cash compensation for the NEOs for the
2008
fiscal year and ensuring that the Compensation Committee had current information
as to developments in the marketplace, the Committee engaged an independent
consulting firm, Lipis Consulting, Inc., specializing in compensation analysis.
Specifically, the Committee requested the consultant to develop a peer group
which included other “high tech” companies and to report base salary, incentive
bonus and equity paid to officers in the peer group holding positions similar
to
our NEOs. The Committee also requested information as to total compensation
amounts and the ratio of the different elements within such total compensation
package for the comparable positioned officers in the peer group. The consultant
performed a statistical survey of the peer group companies and did not make
recommendations regarding specific amounts to be included in the NEOs
compensation packages. The consultant’s study includes information with respect
to fifty-nine (59) public technology companies. (1) Over
50% of
the peer group consists of companies in the semiconductor industry.
Elements
of Executive Compensation. Traditionally,
in allocating the elements of compensation between salary and bonus, the
Compensation Committee believes that since members of management have the
greatest ability to influence the Company’s performance, the ratio of bonus to
salary should be higher with respect to NEO compensation than the ratio used
for
the rest of the employee population.
1
The peer group reviewed by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation
consultant consists of the following companies:
Hytek
Microsystems Inc, Logicvision Inc, Tripath Technology Inc, Universal Display
Corp, DPAC Technologies Corp, Mosys Inc, NVE Corp, Micropac Industries Inc,
Micro Linear Corp/CA/, Alliance Fiber Optic Product, Simtek Corp, Quicklogic
Corp, Transwitch Corp, Ramtron International Corp, HI/FN Inc, AXT Inc, Mellanox
Technologies Ltd, Transmeta Corp, HEI Inc, 8X8 Inc, Techwell Inc, Staktek
Holdings Inc, GSI Technology Inc, Virage Logic Corp, Centillium Communications,
Advanced Power Technology Inc, Color Kinetics Inc, Catalyst Semiconductor Inc,
Rae Systems Inc, Exar Corp, Microtune Inc, Optical Communication Prods, Volterra
Semiconductor Corp, Sipex Corp, Stratos International Inc, Advanced Analogic
Tech, PLX Technology Inc, Zilog Inc, Kopin Corp, Netlogic Microsystems Inc,
Supertex Inc, ESS Technology Inc, Leadis Technology Inc, Evergreen Solar Inc,
Monolithic Power Systems Inc, Oplink Communications Inc, White Electronic
Designs CP, Energy Conversion Dev, Pericom Semiconductor Corp, Anaren Inc,
Hittite Microwave Corp, Pixelworks Inc, Ikanos Communications Inc, First Solar
Inc, Mindspeed Technologies Inc, Sirenza Microdevices Inc, Zarlink Semiconductor
Inc, IPG Photonics Corp, American Science Engineering.
Base
Salaries.
The
Compensation Committee believes in providing senior management with a level
of
cash compensation in the form of base salary that is appropriate for a company
of its size in its market sector. Base salary is intended to provide an element
of certainty and security to the NEOs on an ongoing basis. The Compensation
Committee reviews salaries at the end of each fiscal year and adjusts them
as
warranted. Base salaries are kept within a competitive range for each position
based on the Compensation Committee’s review of benchmark data regarding target
ranges for executive officer compensation at industry peer companies.
Based
on
the independent consultant’s study, in February 2008 the Compensation Committee
determined that in comparison to officers in the peer group holding positions
similar to the NEOs, the base salaries paid to our NEOs were well below the
median; that the incentive cash bonuses (“at risk” compensation) provided for
our NEOs represented a substantially higher percentage of our NEOs total cash
compensation and that our NEOs received significantly less equity compensation.
In light of the study, and in light of the fact that only a 3% increase to
base
salaries had been made since fiscal year 2005, the Committee determined to
make
appropriate adjustments to the annual base salaries of the NEOs.
Based
on
the consultant’s study, independent research undertaken by the Chairman of the
Committee and other factors (including the expansion of its product line to
include more technologically advanced products with higher profit margins and
greater growth potential), the Compensation Committee recommended, and the
independent members of the Board approved, an increase in base salary for each
of the NEOs. In order to distribute the cost to the Company of the salary
increases, the Committee recommended that the NEOs have retroactive salary
increases for the fiscal year 2008 of $52,300 for the CEO, $14,450
for the CFO and $10,650
for the CTO. The Compensation Committee then recommended and the independent
members of the Board approved a base salary for the CEO of $295,000 for the
fiscal year 2009, (which was approximately the median salary paid to comparable
positioned officers in the peer group). With respect to the other NEOs, the
Compensation Committee recommended and the independent members of the Board
approved a base salary of $225,000 and $210,000 for the fiscal year 2009 for
the
CFO and CTO, respectively (which were also approximately the median salaries
paid to comparable positioned officers in the peer group).
Cash
Incentive Bonuses.
The
Company maintains an Executive Incentive Compensation Plan pursuant to which
it
awards cash bonuses based upon performance objectives established by the
Compensation Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. An employee can
earn from 20% to 200% of the employees targeted bonus based on the achievement
of specified revenue and income (as adjusted for non-cash expenses) objectives.
The Compensation Committee and the Board believe these measures form the most
appropriate metric for the Company given its debt, capital structure and its
projected revenue growth and income. The Compensation Committee believes that
the performance objectives are realistic but challenging, and motivate the
NEOs
to promote the achievement of the Company’s financial and strategic plans.
Employees are generally assigned a targeted bonus expressed as a percentage
of
base salary and ranging from 35% to 50% of base salary. At the end of each
fiscal year, the Compensation Committee reviews the Company’s actual performance
as compared to the performance objectives and determines the cash bonus for
each
NEO based on a matrix so that the amount of bonus earned may be more (or less
than) the target bonus depending on whether the Company’s revenues and income
are more (or less than) the stated performance objectives. The Compensation
Committee may make a discretionary bonus when results are outside the scope
of
the matrix due to extraordinary circumstances during the year. No bonuses under
the Executive Incentive Compensation Plan or discretionary bonuses were paid
to
the NEOs for the 2008 fiscal year.
Equity
Compensation.
Historically, the primary form of equity compensation that the Company awarded
consisted of non-qualified stock options. The stockholders approved the 2007
Equity Incentive Plan at the 2007 Annual Stockholder’s Meeting which now gives
the Company the ability to grant both stock options and stock awards, which
may
be subject to time based or performance based vesting depending on the terms
of
the grant. The Committee believes that the ability to grant both types of equity
awards is important in helping to attract and retain executive talent. The
Compensation Committee did not grant any equity awards during fiscal year
2008.
Employment
Agreements, Post-Termination Benefits and Change in Control
Arrangements.
During
fiscal year 2008, Messrs. Risser and Williamson were entitled to certain
post-termination benefits pursuant to their employment agreements (as described
in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Post-Termination Benefits and Change
in Control”), however, each employment agreement expired in May 2008, and
currently none of the NEOs has an employment agreement or any other contractual
severance or change in control benefits. The Board is currently reviewing
employment agreements for the NEOs. Under the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive
Plan, the Board may decide in its sole discretion to accelerate vesting of
stock
options and stock awards granted to employees in connection with a change in
control. As indicated above, during fiscal year 2008, neither stock options
nor
stock awards were granted under such Plan.
Benefits.
NEOs are
subject to the same benefits as all other employees in terms of health benefit
plans, retirement plans and perquisites except for supplemental long term
disability which is greater than that offered by the Company to other employees.
The amount which the Company pays for this benefit is set forth under the
Summary Compensation Table under the category of “All Other Compensation”.
Certain
Tax and Accounting Considerations: Deductibility of
Executive Compensation
Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the deductibility of
compensation (other than qualified performance-based compensation) in excess
of
$1,000,000 paid in a taxable year to a company’s chief executive officer and the
four other most highly compensated executive officers. The Compensation
Committee considers the impact of this deductibility limitation on its
compensation program.
Compensation
Committee Report*
We
have
reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
to be included in the Company’s 2008 Stockholder Meeting Schedule 14A Proxy
Statement, filed pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Proxy Statement). Based on the reviews and discussions referred to
above, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis referred to above be included in the Company’s Proxy
Statement.
|
M.
Scott Farese (Chairman)
|
Lance
Brewer
|
|
*
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous
or
future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the 1934 Act, the Report
on
Executive Compensation by the Compensation Committee shall not be incorporated
by reference in any such filings.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION TABLES AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE
The
following tables set forth executive compensation for the Company’s President
and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Chief
Technology Officer (CTO) (the Named Executive Officers or NEOs) during the
2008
fiscal year.
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth compensation for the Company’s Named Executive
Officers for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.
Name
& Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
(1)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
All
Other Compensation ($) (2)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
Kurtz, CEO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
256,000
|
|
|
8,095
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
262,332
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
17,406
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
8,690
|
|
|
275,846
|
|
Robin
Risser, CFO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
206,928
|
|
|
14,247
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9,418
|
|
|
216,346
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
17,525
|
|
|
45,325
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
256,532
|
|
Steve
Williamson, CTO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
200,008
|
|
|
14,247
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
8,918
|
|
|
208,926
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
17,525
|
|
|
45,325
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
|
256,352
|
|
|
1)
|
Represents
the amount of compensation cost recognized by the Company in fiscal
years
2007 and 2008 related to stock option awards granted in prior years,
as
described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R
(SFAS
123R). For a discussion of valuation assumptions see Note 1 to the
Company’s 2007 and 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements included in its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended March 31, 2007 and
2008.
|
|
2)
|
Amounts
include life insurance premiums, Company matching contributions to
the
401K Savings Plan and long-term disability premiums.
|
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards Table
The
Company provides for cash incentive awards to its NEOs pursuant to the Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan. Annually, the Compensation Committee establishes
a
targeted bonus for each NEO based on a percentage of his annual salary. With
respect to the 2008 fiscal year, the CEO’s targeted bonus was 50% of his 2007
annual base salary and the CFO’s and the CTO’s targeted bonus was 35% of their
2007 annual base salaries. The cash incentive bonus plan provides for a range
of
bonus awards based on the Company’s achievement of sales and net income results
which are approved by the Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year and
are
set forth in a matrix. NEOs are eligible for bonus awards under the bonus matrix
ranging from 20% to 200% of their targeted bonuses based on the Company’s
achievement of the sales and revenue results as of the fiscal year end. For
fiscal year 2008, no incentive bonuses were awarded under the Plan as reflected
in the “Summary Compensation Table.” A discussion of the Compensation
Committee’s administration of the cash incentive bonus plan is provided in the
“Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
The
following table sets forth the minimum (or Threshold), target, and maximum
awards available to the NEOs under the Company’s non-equity incentive plan for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.
Estimated
Future Payout Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Threshold ($) (1)
|
|
Target ($) (2)
|
|
Maximum ($) (3)
|
|
Richard
Kurtz
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
92,500
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
Robin
Risser
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
129,500
|
|
Steve
Williamson
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
129,500
|
|
|
1)
|
Amount’s
represent 20% of the NEO’s targeted
bonus.
|
|
2)
|
Amount’s
represent 100% of the NEO’s targeted
bonus.
|
|
3)
|
Amount’s
represent 200% of the NEO’s targeted
bonus.
|
Narrative
Addendum to the Summary Compensation Table
and
the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
Equity
Plans
The
only
long-term equity incentive compensation plan pursuant to which we presently
grant awards is our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Plan). Pursuant
to
the Equity Plan, employees, including the Named Executive Officers, may be
granted stock options and restricted stock awards (the Awards). The exercise
price of all stock options, including Incentive Stock Options (ISOs) as defined
by Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), is the fair
market value on the date of the grant. In fiscal 2008, the Company did not
grant
any Awards to any of its NEOs. All of our employees, our subsidiaries’
employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to
receive Awards under the Equity Plan. The Equity Plan provides that the
Compensation Committee may determine which employees are granted Awards and
the
number of shares subject to each Award. The non-employee directors are eligible
for automatic grants of stock awards as further described in the narrative
following the Directors Compensation Table.
We
have
historically granted options under our 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan (which
expired January 13, 2007) and our 2000 Stock Option Plan (together the Prior
Option Plans). Following the adoption of the Equity Plan, we have ceased to
issue options under the Prior Option Plans, however all options previously
issued under the Prior Option Plans which remain outstanding continue to be
governed by the terms of such Prior Option Plans.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
The
following table sets forth information regarding each unexercised option held
by
each of the Company’s NEOs as of March 31, 2008.
Name
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
|
Richard
Kurtz
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
5.3440
|
|
|
2/22/2010
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3.1875
|
|
|
8/25/2010
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.8000
|
|
|
4/20/2011
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.8600
|
|
|
8/17/2011
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.6700
|
|
|
2/20/2012
|
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
0.9300
|
|
|
5/19/2013
|
|
|
|
|
22,400
|
|
|
5,600
|
(1)
|
|
2.2500
|
|
|
6/10/2014
|
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
8,400
|
(2)
|
|
2.3200
|
|
|
6/03/2015
|
|
Robin
Risser
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
40,000
|
(3)
|
|
2.1100
|
|
|
5/02/2015
|
|
Steve
Williamson
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
40,000
|
(3)
|
|
2.1100
|
|
|
5/02/2015
|
|
|
1)
|
The
option was granted on June 10, 2004 and is exercisable as to 20%
of the
shares underlying the option on the six month anniversary and the
first,
second, third and fourth annual
anniversaries.
|
|
2)
|
The
option was granted on June 3, 2005 and is exercisable as to 20% of
the
shares underlying the option on the six month anniversary and the
first,
second, third and fourth annual
anniversaries.
|
|
3)
|
The
option was granted on May 2, 2005 and is exercisable as to 20% of
the
shares underlying the option on the six month anniversary and the
first,
second, third and fourth annual
anniversaries.
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
None
of
our Named Executive Officers exercised any stock options during the fiscal
year
ended March 31, 2008.
Post-Termination
Benefits and Change in Control
During
the 2008 fiscal year Messrs. Risser and Williamson were entitled to
post-termination payments and benefits pursuant to the terms of their expired
Employment Agreements which were entered into in connection with the acquisition
of Picometrix, Inc. and which expired on May 2, 2008. Currently, none of our
NEOs are eligible for any post-termination benefits and the Company does not
have any arrangements in place to make payments or provide benefits to its
NEOs
in connection with a change in control of the Company.
The
following table sets forth the Company’s reasonable estimate of the potential
payments to each of Messrs. Risser and Williamson upon termination if such
termination occurred as of March 31, 2008.
Name
(1)
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
All
Other
Compensation ($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Robin
Risser
|
|
|
17,244
|
(2)
|
|
785
|
(3)
|
|
17,029
|
|
Steve
Williamson
|
|
|
16,667
|
(2)
|
|
743
|
(3)
|
|
17,410
|
|
|
1)
|
Messrs.
Risser and Williamson were entitled to post-termination benefits
pursuant
to their three year employment agreements which expired on May 2,
2008.
|
|
2)
|
Represents
their annual base salary pro-rated for the period from April 1, 2008
through May 2, 2008.
|
|
3)
|
Amounts
represent estimates of payments relating to life insurance premiums,
health and welfare benefits, short-term and long-term disability
premiums
and earned vacation pro-rated for the period from April 1, 2008 through
May 2, 2008.
|
Director
Compensation Table
The
table
below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to non-employee directors
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
Option Awards
($) (1)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Lance
Brewer
|
|
|
30,950
|
|
|
25,840
|
|
|
56,790
|
|
M.
Scott Farese
|
|
|
34,200
|
|
|
22,443
|
|
|
56,643
|
|
Donald
Pastor
|
|
|
32,700
|
|
|
25,840
|
|
|
58,540
|
|
Steve
Soltwedel
|
|
|
33,200
|
|
|
22,443
|
|
|
55,643
|
|
|
1)
|
Represents
the amount of compensation cost recognized by the Company in fiscal
year
2008 related to stock option awards granted in prior years, as described
in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (SFAS 123R).
For a
discussion of valuation assumptions see Note 1 to the Company’s 2008
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008.
|
Director
Fees
During
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, each Director was paid an annual retainer
of $24,325 plus a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting attended. In addition
each Committee member was paid $750 for each Committee meeting attended, and
the
Chairman of the Compensation Committee received $250 per quarter and the
Chairman of the Audit Committee received $625 per quarter. In addition, we
have
an arrangement to reimburse any out-of-town non-employee director for expenses
associated with travel to any Board Meeting.
Automatic
Equity Grants
In
addition, our non-employee directors participate in the 2007 Equity Incentive
Plan (the Equity Plan). Under the Equity Plan, an initial stock grant covering
Common Stock having a fair market value of $25,000 on the date of the grant
pro-rated for the period from the director’s appointment to the following
September 1 is automatically granted to non-employee directors upon appointment
to the Board. Each such stock grant is subject to a risk of forfeiture for
a six
month period from the date of grant. No new directors were appointed during
fiscal year 2008, and accordingly, no directors were eligible for this
grant.
The
Equity Plan further provides that on September 1 of each year each then serving
non-employee director will be granted an annual stock grant of that number
of
shares of Common Stock having a fair market value of $25,000 on the date of
grant. Each such stock grant is subject to a risk of forfeiture for a six month
period from the date of grant. This annual stock grant is to first be awarded
on
September 1, 2008, at which time it will only be awarded to Messrs. Farese
and
Soltwedel who would have been the only two directors eligible to receive the
annual option grant for incumbent directors under the Company’s prior option
plans, assuming such directors are serving on the Board at such time. The
remaining two non-employee directors will receive their first annual grant
on
September 1, 2009 assuming they are providing services at such time, which
is
when they would have been eligible to receive the annual option grant for
incumbent directors under the Company’s prior option plans.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The
Company is the obligor with respect to a promissory note held by Mr.
Risser, a Director of the Company and its CFO, (the Risser Note), and a
promissory note held by Mr. Williamson, the Company’s CTO, (the Williamson
Note). The notes were entered into in connection with the Company’s acquisition
of Messrs. Risser’s and Williamson’s equity interests in Picometrix, Inc. The
highest amount owing under the Risser Note during the fiscal year was $800,166
which was the amount owing as of April 1, 2007. The highest amount owing under
the Williamson Note during the fiscal year was $1,600,334 which was the amount
owing as of April 1, 2007. As of March 31, 2008, $616,833 was outstanding under
the Risser Note and $1,233,667 was outstanding under the Williamson Note. The
principal and interest on the notes is payable in annual installments and each
promissory note accrues interest at a rate 9.25% per annum. As
approved by the Company’s Audit Committee, the Company entered into amendments
of each Note to extend the due date for the third installment (in the aggregate
amount of $900,000) to December 1, 2008 from the original agreement payment
date
of May 1, 2008. The
final
payment under the notes is due on May 2, 2009. With respect to the fiscal year
ended March 2008, the Company
paid $226,367 in principal and interest under the Risser Note and $452,736
under
the Williamson Note.
RELATIONSHIP
WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
BDO
Seidman,
LLP,
independent
auditors, audited the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2008.
Representatives of BDO
Seidman
are
expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions
from stockholders and to make a statement if they desire to do so.
Effective
July 19, 2007, the Company dismissed its independent auditors Farber, Hass
&
Hurley LLP and engaged BDO Seidman as its independent auditor.
The
decision to change the Company’s accounting firm was approved by the Audit
Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. The reports of Farber, Hass &
Hurley LLP on the financial statements of the Company for the past two fiscal
years ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 did not contain an adverse opinion
or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty,
audit scope or accounting principle.
In
connection with the audits of the Company’s financial statements for each of the
two fiscal years ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 and in the subsequent
interim period from April 1, 2007 through and including July 19, 2007, there
were no disagreements between the Company and Farber, Hass & Hurley LLP
on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved
to the satisfaction of Farber, Hass & Hurley LLP, would have caused them to
make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements for such
years.
During
each of the two fiscal years ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 and in
the
subsequent interim period from April 1, 2007 through and including July 19,
2007, there were no “reportable events” as that term is described in Item 304
(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
The
Company has not consulted with BDO Seidman during the last two fiscal years
ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006 or during the subsequent
interim period from April 1, 2007 through and including July 19, 2007, on either
the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either
completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered
on
the Company’s financial statements, or any other matters or reportable events
pursuant to Item 304(a)(2)(i) and Item 304(a)(2)(ii) of Regulation
S-K.
INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR FEES
The
following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Company for
professional audit services rendered by BDO
Seidman
for the
2008 fiscal year and Farber, Haas & Hurley for the 2007 fiscal year for the
audits of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial
statements included in the registrant’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and fees
billed for other services rendered by BDO
Seidman in the 2008 fiscal year and Farber, Haas and Hurley in the 2007 fiscal
year.
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Audit
Fees (1)
|
|
$
|
145,000
|
|
$
|
131,000
|
|
Audit
Related Fees
|
|
|
-0
|
- |
$
|
3,000
|
(2)
|
Tax
Fees
|
|
|
-0
|
- |
|
-0-
|
|
All
Other Fees
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
(3)
|
|
-0-
|
|
Total
(4)
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
$
|
134,000
|
|
______________________
|
1)
|
The
fees were related to the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial
statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and
reviews of its interim financial statements included in the Company’s
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
|
|
2)
|
Audit
related fees for the 2007 fiscal year were principally related to
services
rendered in connection with the review of our registration statement
filed
during fiscal year 2007.
|
|
3)
|
The
fees consisted of services regarding the accounting for the closure
of our
Dodgeville facility.
|
|
4)
|
Does
not include $20,760 of fees paid to Farber, Haas & Hurley
LLP
for services
rendered in connection with the review of our registration statements
filed during fiscal year 2008 and our response to a SEC comment
letter.
|
|
5)
|
The
Audit Committee has determined that the provision of all non-audit
services performed for the Company by BDO Seidman, LLP and Faber,
Hass
& Hurley LLP is compatible with maintaining that firms’
independence.
|
The
Audit
Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit services and all non-audit
services that the Company’s independent auditor is permitted to perform for the
Company under applicable federal securities regulations. While
it is
the general policy of the Audit Committee to make such determinations at full
Audit Committee Meetings, the Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval
authority to one or more members of the Audit Committee, provided that all
such
decisions are presented to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly
scheduled meeting.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT*
The
Company’s Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on
behalf of the Board of Directors (the Board). The Committee has three members,
each of whom is “independent” as determined under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules of the American Stock Exchange.
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the
Board.
The
Audit
Committee met and held discussions with management and representatives
of
BDO Seidman,
the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee
reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements, as well
as
the unaudited financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
for each of the first three quarters of the fiscal year, with management and
BDO
Seidman.
The
Audit Committee discussed with BDO
Seidman
the
matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
as
amended. BDO
Seidman
also
provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosure required by Standard
No. 1, “Independence Discussions with Audit Committee,” and the Committee
discussed with BDO
Seidman
its
independence.
Based
on
the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included
in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008
for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit
Committee
|
Stephen
Soltwedel (Chairman)
|
Donald
Pastor
|
|
* |
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set
forth in
any of our previous or future filings under the Securities Act of
1933 or
the 1934 Act, the Audit Committee Report shall not be incorporated
by
reference in any such filings.
|
PROPOSAL
2
AMENDMENT
TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
TO
INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED CLASS A COMMON STOCK
The
stockholders are asked to consider and approve a proposed amendment to the
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation (the Amendment) solely to increase the
authorized Class A Common Stock of the Company from 50,000,000 shares to
100,000,000 shares. The Company is currently authorized to issue up to
10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. No change to the Company’s Preferred Stock
authorization is requested. The Amendment also acknowledges that the Class
B
Common Stock has been converted to Class A Common Stock in accordance with
the
terms of the Certificate of Incorporation currently in effect. A copy of
the Amendment to be presented for adoption by the stockholders is annexed hereto
as Appendix A.
The
Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, will authorize the Company
to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock (Common Stock) and
10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. As of June 30, 2008, 24,680,669 shares
of
Common Stock were issued and outstanding. Additionally, as of that date an
aggregate of 7,264,630 shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance in
connection with the grant of stock awards and upon the exercise of options
granted or available for grant under the Company’s various equity plans or upon
the exercise of warrants individually granted by the Board of Directors.
The
Board
of Directors considers it desirable to have available for issuance sufficient
authorized shares of Common Stock to enable the Company to act without delay
if
favorable opportunities arise to raise additional equity capital or to acquire
companies by the issuance of shares of Common Stock and otherwise to be in
a
position to take various steps requiring the issuance of additional shares
of
Common Stock that in the judgment of the Board of Directors are in the best
interests of the Company. The Company has no current plans, arrangements or
understandings regarding the issuance of any of the additional shares of Common
Stock for which authorization is sought and there are no negotiations pending
with respect to the issuance thereof for any purpose.
If
the
proposal to increase the authorized number of shares of Common Stock is approved
by the stockholders, the additional shares may be issued at such time and on
such terms and conditions as the Board of Directors may determine without
further approval by the stockholders, subject to applicable provisions of law
and the rules of any securities exchange on which shares of the Common Stock
are
listed for trading. The Company’s Common Stock is currently listed with
the AMEX. In certain circumstances the AMEX rules may require the vote of
stockholders to approve future issuances, particularly in connection with share
issuances relating to a change in control and certain discounted
issuances.
To
accomplish the proposed increase in the Company’s authorized capital stock,
Article Fourth of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation must be amended as
set forth in Appendix A to this Proxy Statement.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION.
MISCELLANEOUS
Annual
Report
The
Company’s 2008 Annual Report is being mailed to stockholders contemporaneously
with this Proxy Statement.
Form
10-K
AT
YOUR WRITTEN REQUEST, WE WILL PROVIDE WITHOUT CHARGE A COPY OF OUR ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K AS FILED WITH THE SEC FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2008.
PLEASE MAIL YOUR REQUEST TO THE SECRETARY, ADVANCED PHOTONIX, INC.,
2925 BOARDWALK, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104. YOU MAY ALSO ACCESS OUR
10-K UNDER THE “INVESTORS” LINK ON OUR WEBSITE AT
WWW.ADVANCEDPHOTONIX.COM.
Proposals
of Stockholders; Stockholder Business
If
you
wish to submit a proposal for consideration at our 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, you should submit the proposal in writing to the Secretary of
the
Company at the address set forth on the Notice page of this Proxy Statement.
Proposals must be received by us on or before March 18, 2009, for inclusion
in
next year’s proxy materials. If you submit a proposal you must, in all other
respects, comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If
you intend to present a proposal at our 2009 Annual Meeting without inclusion
of
the proposal in our proxy materials, you are required to provide notice of
the
presenting proposal to the Company in accordance with our by-laws no later
than
June 23, 2009 nor earlier than May 25, 2009.
Your
vote is important. We urge you to vote without delay.
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
ROBIN
F. RISSER,
|
|
Dated:
July ____,
2008
Appendix
A
CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
TO
ADVANCED
PHOTONIX, INC.
CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
I,
Richard D. Kurtz, President and Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Photonix,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, do hereby certify that:
FIRST: The
name
of the corporation is Advanced Photonix, Inc. The date of filing of its
Certificate of Incorporation in the State of Delaware was June 22,
1988.
SECOND: Whereas
the Class B Common Stock has been converted into Class A Common Stock in
accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the
board
of directors and the stockholders of the corporation have approved an increase
in the authorized capital of the corporation as set forth in this amendment,
the
first paragraph of Article FOURTH of the corporation’s Certificate of
Incorporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
FOURTH:
The
total number of shares that the corporation shall have authority to issue is
110,000,000, consisting of 100,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par
value
$.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.001
per
share (“Preferred Stock”) of which 780,000 shares shall be designated as Class A
Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share (“Class A Preferred
Stock”).
THIRD: This
amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
FOURTH: This
amendment shall become effective on the date of filing.
In
Witness Whereof, I have signed this Certificate the ____ day of August,
2008.
ADVANCED
PHOTONIX, INC.
Proxy
- For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders – August 22,
2008
I
appoint
Richard D. Kurtz and Robin F. Risser, or either of them, as my proxies, with
full power of substitution, to vote all shares of Class A Common Stock of
ADVANCED
PHOTONIX, INC.
which I
am entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on August
22, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. at the Company’s Michigan office, 2925 Boardwalk, Ann
Arbor, Michigan, and any adjournments of the meeting on all matters coming
before said meeting.
My
proxies will vote the shares represented by this proxy as directed on the other
side of this card, but in the absence of any instructions from me, my proxies
will vote “FOR” the election of all the nominees listed under Proposal 1 and
“FOR” Proposal 2. My proxies may vote according to their discretion on any other
matter which may properly come before the meeting. I may revoke this proxy
prior
to its exercise.
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
Board
of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR
Proposals 1 and 2.
(continued
on reverse side)
ADVANCED
PHOTONIX, INC.
2925
BOARDWALK
ANN
ARBOR, MI 48104
|
VOTE
BY MAIL
Mark,
sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope
we have provided or return it to ADVANCED PHOTONIX, INC., c/o Broadridge,
51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
|
|
TO
VOTE,
MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
ADVPH1
KEEP
THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION
ONLY
THIS
PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
ADVANCED PHOTONIX, INC.
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold
|
|
For All
|
|
To
withhold authority to vote for any individual
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
All
|
|
Except
|
|
nominee(s),
mark “For All Except” and write the
|
Vote On Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number(s)
of the nominee(s) on the line below.
|
1.
|
Election of Six Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01)
|
Richard
D. Kurtz
|
|
04)
|
M. Scott Farese
|
|
|
|
|
|
02)
|
Robin
F. Risser
|
|
05)
|
Donald Pastor
|
|
|
|
|
|
03)
|
Lance
Brewer
|
|
06)
|
Stephen P. Soltwedel
|
|
|
|
|
Vote
On Proposal
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
2.
|
Adoption
of the Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
Increase the Authorized Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please
sign here exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. If signing
for
an estate, trust or corporation, title or capacity should be stated.
If
shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. If a partnership,
sign
in partnership name by authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE
SIGN, DATE AND MAIL IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
[PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
Date
|
|
Signature
(Joint Owners)
|
Date
|