QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.      )

 

---

Table of Contents

January [    •    ], 2012

Dear Shareholder,

        You are invited to attend the 2012 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of TE Connectivity Ltd., to be held on March 7, 2012 at 2:00 p.m., Central European Time (8:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time), at the Park Hyatt Zürich, Beethoven-Strasse 21, 8002 Zürich, Switzerland. Details of the business to be presented at the meeting can be found in the accompanying Invitation to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement.

        If you cannot attend, you can ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly completing, signing, and dating your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed envelope.

        We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Sincerely,

Frederic M. Poses
Chairman of the Board

TE Connectivity Ltd.
Rheinstrasse 20
CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland

Tel: +41 (0)52 633 66 61
Fax: +41 (0)52 633 66 99

---

Table of Contents

Contents

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            i

---

Table of Contents

TE CONNECTIVITY LTD.
Rheinstrasse 20
CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland

Invitation to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            1

---

Table of Contents

2            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

By order of the Board of Directors,

Harold G. Barksdale
Corporate Secretary

January [    •    ], 2012

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            3

---

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

TE CONNECTIVITY LTD.
TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2012

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTING

Why am I receiving these materials?

        TE Connectivity's Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the Annual General Meeting to be held at 2:00 p.m., Central European Time (8:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time), on March 7, 2012, at the Park Hyatt Zürich, Beethoven-Strasse 21, 8002 Zürich, Switzerland. The information provided in this proxy statement is for your use in determining how you will vote on the agenda items described within.

        We have sent this proxy statement and proxy card to each person who is registered as a holder of our shares in the register of shareholders (such owners are often referred to as "holders of record" or "record holders") as of the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on January 10, 2012. We will also send a copy of this proxy statement and proxy card to any additional shareholders who become registered in our share register after the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on January 10, 2012 and continue to be registered in our share register at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012. Distribution of this proxy statement and a proxy card to shareholders is scheduled to begin on or about January [    •    ], 2012.

        We have requested that banks, brokerage firms and other nominees who hold TE Connectivity shares on behalf of the owners of the shares (such owners are often referred to, and we refer to them below, as "beneficial owners," "beneficial shareholders" or "street name holders") as of the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on January 10, 2012 forward these materials, together with a proxy card or voting instruction card, to those beneficial shareholders and to do the same for any additional beneficial owners who acquire their shares after January 10, 2012 and continue to hold them at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012. We have agreed to pay the reasonable expenses of the banks, brokerage firms and other nominees for forwarding these materials. We also have provided for these materials to be sent to persons who have interests in our shares through participation in our employee share purchase plans. These individuals are not eligible to vote directly at the Annual General Meeting, but they may instruct the trustees of these plans how to vote the shares represented by their interests. The enclosed proxy card also will serve as voting instructions for the trustees of the plans.

Are proxy materials available on the Internet?

        Yes.

        Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual General Meeting to be Held on March 7, 2012.

        Our proxy statement for the Annual General Meeting to be held on March 7, 2012, other proxy material and our annual report to shareholders for fiscal year 2011 is available at http://www.te.com/2012AnnualMeeting.

What agenda items are scheduled to be voted on at the meeting?

        The eleven agenda items scheduled for a vote are:

•

Agenda Item No. 1: To elect eleven (11) nominees proposed by the Board of Directors as directors to hold office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders;

4            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

•

Agenda Item No. 2: To approve (i) the 2011 Annual Report of TE Connectivity Ltd. (excluding the statutory financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011), (ii) the statutory financial statements of TE Connectivity Ltd. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, and (iii) the consolidated financial statements of TE Connectivity Ltd. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011;



•

Agenda Item No. 3: To release the members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of TE Connectivity for activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011;



•

Agenda Item No. 4: To elect (i) Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2012, (ii) Deloitte AG, Zurich, Switzerland, as our Swiss registered auditor until our next annual general meeting, and (iii) PricewaterhouseCoopers AG, Zurich, Switzerland, as our special auditor until our next annual general meeting;



•

Agenda Item No. 5: To cast an advisory vote on executive compensation;



•

Agenda Item No. 6: To approve an increase in the number of shares available for awards under the TE Connectivity Ltd. 2007 Stock and Incentive Plan;



•

Agenda Item No. 7: To approve a reduction of share capital for shares acquired under our share repurchase program and related amendments to our articles of association;



•

Agenda Item No. 8: To approve an authorization related to our share repurchase program;



•

Agenda Item No. 9: To approve the equivalent of a dividend payment in the form of a distribution to shareholders through a reduction of the par value of our shares, such payment in a Swiss franc amount equal to US$ 0.84 per issued share to be paid in four equal quarterly installments of US$ 0.21 starting with the third fiscal quarter of 2012 and ending in the second fiscal quarter of 2013 pursuant to the terms of the capital reduction distribution resolution;



•

Agenda Item No. 10: To approve a reallocation of free reserves (contributed surplus) to legal reserves (reserves from capital contributions); and



•

Agenda Item No. 11: To approve any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

What is the recommendation of the Board of Directors on each of the agenda items scheduled to be voted on at the meeting? How do the Board of Directors and executive officers intend to vote with respect to the agenda items?

        TE Connectivity's Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the agenda items listed above as recommended by our Board of Directors. Our directors and executive officers have indicated that they intend to vote their shares in favor of each of the agenda items, except for Agenda Item No. 3 (Release of the Members of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers of TE Connectivity for Activities during the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2011), where they are by law precluded from voting their shares. On January [    •    ], 2012, our directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially owned approximately [    •    ]% of the outstanding shares.

What is the difference between being a shareholder of record and a beneficial owner?

        If your shares are registered directly in your name in our share register operated by our stock transfer agent, you are considered the "shareholder of record" of those shares.

        If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf and the broker, bank or nominee is registered in our share register as a shareholder with voting rights, your broker, bank or other nominee is considered the shareholder of record and you are considered

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            5

---

Table of Contents

the "beneficial owner" or "street name holder" of those shares. In this case, the shareholder of record that is registered as a shareholder with voting rights has forwarded these proxy materials, and separate voting instructions, to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the shareholder of record how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions they have provided with these materials. Because you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you receive a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares in person at the meeting.

Who is entitled to vote?

Shareholders of record

        All shareholders registered in our share register at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012 are entitled to vote on the matters set forth in this proxy statement and any other matter properly presented at the meeting for consideration, provided such shareholders will have become registered as shareholders with voting rights by that time. See "—I am a shareholder of record. How do I become registered as a shareholder with voting rights?"

Beneficial owners

        Beneficial owners whose banks, brokers or nominees are shareholders registered in our share register with respect to the beneficial owners' shares at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012 are entitled to vote on the matters set forth in this proxy statement and any other matter properly presented at the meeting for consideration, provided such banks, brokers or nominees become registered as shareholders with voting rights. See "—I am a shareholder of record. How do I become registered as a shareholder with voting rights?"

What if I am the record holder or beneficial owner of shares at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on January 10, 2012 but sell or otherwise transfer those shares before the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012?

        Holders of record and beneficial owners will not be entitled to vote their shares or provide instructions to vote with respect to their shares if they hold shares at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on January 10, 2012 but sell or otherwise transfer those shares before the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012.

I am a shareholder of record. How do I become registered as a shareholder with voting rights?

        If you are a shareholder of record, you have been registered as a shareholder with voting rights in our share register, unless in certain circumstances (such as failure to comply with particular disclosure requirements set forth in our articles of association) we have specifically advised you that you are registered as a shareholder without voting rights.

How do I attend the Annual General Meeting?

        For admission to the meeting, shareholders and their authorized representatives must bring a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver's license or a passport. Shareholders of record with voting rights should bring the portion of the proxy card marked "Admission Ticket" to the check-in area, where their ownership will be verified. Those who have beneficial ownership of registered shares held by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee which has voting rights must bring to the check-in area account statements or letters from their banks, brokers or nominees showing that they own TE Connectivity registered shares as of the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012.

        Registration will begin at 1:00 p.m., Central European Time (7:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time), and the meeting will begin at 2:00 p.m., Central European Time (8:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time).

6            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

See "—How do I vote if I am a shareholder of record?" and "—How do I vote if I am a beneficial shareholder?" for a discussion of who is eligible and how to vote in person at the Annual General Meeting.

        Security measures will be in place at the meeting to help ensure the safety of attendees. Cameras, sound recording devices, signs, photographs and visual displays are not permitted in the meeting without the prior permission of TE Connectivity. We reserve the right to inspect bags, backpacks, briefcases or other packages brought to the meeting. Cell phones and other sound transmitting devices must be turned off during the meeting.

How do I vote if I am a shareholder of record?

        If you are a registered shareholder, you can vote in the following ways:

        At the Annual General Meeting:    If you are a shareholder of record with voting rights of TE Connectivity registered shares who plans to attend the Annual General Meeting and wishes to vote your shares in person, we will give you a ballot at the meeting.

Even if you plan to be present at the Annual General Meeting, we encourage you to complete and mail the enclosed card to vote your shares by proxy. If you are a holder of record, you may still attend the Annual General Meeting and vote in person.

        By Mail:    If you are a holder of record with voting rights, you may vote by marking, dating and signing the enclosed proxy card and returning it by mail for receipt by no later than indicated below. You may appoint the officers of TE Connectivity named in the proxy card as your proxy. If you appoint officers of TE Connectivity as your proxy, you will need to send your proxy card to TE Connectivity Ltd., c/o BNY Mellon Shareowner Services, P. O. Box 3550, South Hackensack, NJ 07606-9250, United States of America. Alternatively, you may authorize the independent proxy, Dr. Jvo Grundler, Ernst & Young AG, with full rights of substitution, to vote your shares on your behalf. If you appoint the independent proxy, you will need to send your proxy card directly to the independent proxy at the following address: Dr. Jvo Grundler, Ernst & Young Ltd., Maagplatz 1, P.O. Box, CH-8046, Zurich, Switzerland.

In order to assure that your votes are tabulated in time to be voted at the Annual General Meeting, you must submit your proxy card so that it is received by 5:00 p.m., Central European Time (11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time) on March 6, 2012.

        If you have timely submitted a properly executed proxy card and clearly indicated your votes, your shares will be voted as indicated. If you have timely submitted a properly executed proxy card and have not clearly indicated your votes, your shares will be voted FOR each of the agenda items for which you have not clearly indicated votes as recommended by our Board of Directors. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting, the TE Connectivity officers or the independent proxy, as applicable, will vote the shares represented by all properly executed proxies in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

How do I vote if I am a beneficial shareholder?

        General:    If you hold your shares in street name, you should provide instructions to your bank or broker on how you wish your vote to be recorded by following the instructions on your voting instruction form supplied by your bank or broker with these proxy materials.

        At the Annual General Meeting:    If you are a shareholder who owns shares in street name, you are not entitled to vote in person at the Annual General Meeting unless you have a proxy, executed in your favor, from the bank, broker or nominee holder of record of your shares. We will then give you a ballot at the meeting.

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            7

---

Table of Contents

Can I vote by telephone or via the Internet?

        If you are a shareholder of record, you cannot vote by telephone or via the Internet. If you are a beneficial owner, see the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other nominee for telephone or Internet voting instructions.

How do I appoint TE Connectivity officers as my proxy?

        If you properly fill in your proxy card and mark the appropriate box so as to appoint officers of TE Connectivity as your proxy, with full rights of substitution, and send it to us in time to vote, your proxy, meaning one of the individuals named on your proxy card, will vote your shares as you have directed. If you sign the proxy card but do not make specific choices, you will be deemed to appoint officers of TE Connectivity as your proxy and your proxy will vote your shares FOR each of the agenda items listed in the Invitation to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders as recommended by the Board of Directors. Alternatively, you can grant a proxy to the independent proxy as described below.

        If a new agenda item or a new motion or proposal for an existing agenda item is properly presented to the Annual General Meeting, the TE Connectivity officers acting as your proxy will vote in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors. At the time of printing this proxy statement, we know of no matters to be acted on at the Annual General Meeting other than those discussed in the Invitation to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders and this proxy statement.

How do I appoint the independent proxy as my proxy?

        If you are a shareholder of record with voting rights, you may authorize the independent proxy, Dr. Jvo Grundler, with full rights of substitution, to vote your shares on your behalf by marking the box corresponding to the independent proxy on the enclosed proxy card. If you authorize the independent proxy to vote your shares without giving instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors with regard to the items listed in the Invitation to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. If new agenda items (other than those in the Invitation) or new motions or proposals with respect to those agenda items set forth in the Invitation are properly being put forth at the Annual General Meeting, the independent proxy will vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors. Proxy cards authorizing the independent proxy to vote shares on your behalf must be sent by mail directly to the independent proxy at the following address: Dr. Jvo Grundler, Ernst & Young Ltd., Maagplatz 1, P.O. Box, CH-8046, Zurich, Switzerland. These proxy cards must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Central European Time (11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time), on March 6, 2012.

If my shares are held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

        We recommend that you contact your broker. Your broker can give you directions on how to instruct the broker to vote your shares. If you have not provided instructions to the broker, your broker will be able to vote your shares with respect to "routine" matters but not "non-routine" matters pursuant to New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules. We believe the following agenda items will be considered non-routine under NYSE rules and therefore your broker will not be able to vote your shares with respect to these agenda items unless the broker receives appropriate instructions from you: Agenda Item No. 1 (Election of Directors), Agenda Item No. 5 (Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation) and Agenda Item No. 6 (Approval of an Increase in the Number of Shares Available for Awards Under the TE Connectivity Ltd. 2007 Stock and Incentive Plan).

What if I am a proxy holder of deposited shares?

        Institutions subject to the Swiss Federal Law on Banks and Savings Banks as well as professional asset managers who hold proxies for holders of record with voting rights who did not grant proxies to TE Connectivity officers or the independent proxy must inform TE Connectivity of the number of

8            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

shares they represent by mail so that we receive notice no later than 5:00 p.m., Central European Time (11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time), on March 6, 2012. This information must be mailed to: TE Connectivity Ltd., Attention: Secretary, Rheinstrasse 20, CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland.

What will happen if I don't vote my shares?

        If you are a shareholder of record and you do not sign and return your proxy card, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the meeting. If you are a shareholder of record and you return your signed proxy card but make no direction as to how your shares are to be voted, your shares will be voted "FOR" each of the director nominees and "FOR" each of the other agenda items (including each subpart thereof) and in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors on such other business as may properly be presented at the Annual General Meeting.

        If you are a beneficial shareholder and you do not provide voting instructions to your bank or broker, subject to any contractual arrangements your bank or broker may vote your shares in its discretion on all agenda items except Agenda Item No. 1 (Election of Directors), Agenda Item No. 5 (Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation) and Agenda Item No. 6 (Approval of an Increase in the Number of Shares Available for Awards Under the TE Connectivity Ltd. 2007 Stock and Incentive Plan) and no votes will be cast on your behalf on Agenda Items No. 1, No. 5 and No. 6.

How many shares can vote at the Annual General Meeting?

        Our registered shares are our only class of voting stock. As of January [    •    ], 2012, there were [    •    ] registered shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote; however, shareholders who are not registered in our share register as shareholders or do not become registered as shareholders with voting rights as of the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012 will not be entitled to attend, vote or grant proxies to vote at, the Annual General Meeting. See "—I am a shareholder of record. How do I become registered as a shareholder with voting rights?" Shares duly represented at the Annual General Meeting will be entitled to one vote per share for each matter presented at the Annual General Meeting. Shareholders who are registered in our share register as of the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012 and who are registered with voting rights may vote in person at the Annual General Meeting as discussed under "—How do I vote if I am a shareholder of record?—At the Annual General Meeting."

What quorum is required for the Annual General Meeting?

        The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least the majority of the registered shares entitled to vote constitutes a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual General Meeting.

What vote is required for approval of each agenda item and what is the effect of broker non-votes and abstentions?

        The following agenda items require the affirmative vote of an absolute majority of the votes of registered shares with voting rights that are represented at the Annual General Meeting in person or by proxy. An absolute majority means at least half plus one additional vote represented at a general meeting of shareholders.

•

Agenda Item No. 1: Election of eleven (11) director nominees proposed by the Board of Directors;



•

Agenda Item Nos. 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3: Approval of (i) the 2011 Annual Report of TE Connectivity Ltd. (excluding the statutory financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011), (ii) the statutory financial statements of TE Connectivity Ltd. for the fiscal

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            9

---

Table of Contents

year ended September 30, 2011, and (iii) the consolidated financial statements of TE Connectivity Ltd. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011;

•

Agenda Item Nos. 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3: Election of (i) Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2012, (ii) Deloitte AG, Zurich, Switzerland, as our Swiss registered auditor until our next annual general meeting, and (iii) PricewaterhouseCoopers AG, Zurich, Switzerland, as our special auditor until our next annual general meeting;



•

Agenda Item No. 5: Advisory vote on executive compensation;



•

Agenda Item No. 7: Approval of reduction of share capital for shares acquired under our share repurchase program;



•

Agenda Item No. 8: Authorization relating to share repurchase program;



•

Agenda Item No. 9: Approval of the equivalent of a dividend payment in the form of a distribution to shareholders through a reduction of the par value of our shares;



•

Agenda Item No. 10: Reallocation of free reserves (contributed surplus) to legal reserves (reserves from capital contributions); and



•

Agenda Item No. 11: Approval of any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

        The following agenda item requires the affirmative vote of an absolute majority of the votes of registered shares with voting rights that are represented at the Annual General Meeting in person or by proxy, not counting the votes of any member of the Board of Directors or any executive officer of TE Connectivity.

•

Agenda Item No. 3: The release of the members of the Board of Directors and executive officers for activities during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

        The following agenda item requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast on the agenda item, provided that the total votes cast on the agenda item represent over 50% of the voting power of the total outstanding registered shares with voting rights.

•

Agenda Item No. 6: Approval of an increase in the number of shares available for awards under the TE Connectivity Ltd. 2007 Stock and Incentive Plan.

        Registered shares which are represented by broker non-votes (which occur when a broker holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular agenda item because the broker does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner) and registered shares which are cast as abstentions on any matter, are counted towards the determination of a majority required to approve such agenda item and will therefore have the effect of an AGAINST vote on that item. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for quorum purposes.

Who will count the votes and certify the results?

        An independent vote tabulator will count the votes. BNY Mellon Shareowner Services has been appointed by the Board of Directors as the independent inspector of election and will determine the existence of a quorum, validity of proxies and ballots, and certify the results of the voting.

If I vote and then want to change or revoke my vote, may I?

        If you are a shareholder of record and have granted a proxy to designated officers of TE Connectivity, you may revoke or change your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the meeting by submitting a later dated proxy card at or before the meeting, by notifying our Secretary in writing that you have revoked your proxy, or by attending the meeting and giving notice of revocation in person. If

10            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

you wish to revoke your proxy, you must do so in sufficient time to permit the necessary examination and tabulation of the subsequent proxy or revocation before the vote is taken. Written revocations should be directed to:

Secretary
TE Connectivity Ltd.
Rheinstrasse 20
CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland

        If you are a shareholder of record and have granted a proxy to the independent proxy, Dr. Jvo Grundler, you may revoke or change your proxy at any time before it is exercised at the meeting by submitting a revocation letter, and new proxy, if applicable, directly to the independent proxy so that it is received by no later than 5:00 p.m., Central European Time (11:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time) on March 6, 2012. Written revocations should be directed to the following address: Dr. Jvo Grundler, Ernst & Young Ltd., Maagplatz 1, P.O. Box, CH-8046, Zurich, Switzerland.

        Your presence without voting at the meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy, and any revocation during the meeting will not affect votes previously taken at the meeting.

        If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf, follow the voting instructions provided to you with these materials to determine how you may change your vote.

Can I sell my shares before the meeting if I have voted?

        Yes. TE Connectivity does not block the transfer of shares before the meeting. However, unless you are a shareholder of record with voting rights at the close of business (Eastern Standard Time) on February 17, 2012, your vote will not be counted.

Are shareholders permitted to ask questions at the meeting?

        During the Annual General Meeting, shareholders may ask questions or make comments relating to agenda items when permitted by the moderator.

Whom may I contact for assistance?

        You should contact Innisfree M&A Incorporated, who we have engaged as a proxy solicitor for the Annual General Meeting. The contact information for Innisfree is below:

Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022, United States of America
Shareholders call toll free 877-750-9497 (U.S. and Canada)
or collect +1-412-232-3651 (international)
Banks and brokerage firms call collect 212-750-5834

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            11

---

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        The following table sets forth the number of outstanding shares of TE Connectivity beneficially owned as of September 30, 2011 by each current director and nominee, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all of our executive officers, directors and nominees as a group. All current directors are nominees for director, except Mr. Hernandez. The address of our executive officers and directors is c/o TE Connectivity, 1050 Westlakes Drive, Berwyn, Pennsylvania 19312.

12            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth the information indicated for persons or groups known to us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding shares as of September 30, 2011.

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            13

---

Table of Contents

14            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

AGENDA ITEM NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Motion Proposed by the Board of Directors

        At the Annual General Meeting, upon the recommendation of the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee, the Board of Directors proposes eleven (11) nominees for election as directors to hold office until the annual general meeting of shareholders in 2013. Nine nominees are current directors of TE Connectivity Ltd. and two nominees, Mr. Nam and Dr. Jeffrey, are not current directors of TE Connectivity Ltd. The Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee retained a third party search firm to assist it in identifying Mr. Nam and Dr. Jeffrey for Board membership. All nominees are listed below with brief biographies. Robert M. Hernandez has decided not to stand for re-election.

Vote Requirement to Elect Directors

        The approval of a majority of our shares represented at the meeting, whether in person or by proxy, is required for approval of the election of each of the eleven (11) nominees for director.

Recommendation

        The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the election of each of the eleven (11) nominees for director. Proxies will be so voted unless shareholders specify otherwise in their proxies.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION

Qualifications of Nominees Recommended by the Board

        The Board as a whole is constituted to be strong in its collective knowledge of and diversity of experience in accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, crisis management, risk assessment, industry knowledge, corporate governance and global markets. The Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee designs searches for candidates to fill vacancies on the Board and makes recommendations for director nominations to the Board. When preparing to search for a new director, the committee takes into account the experience, qualifications, skills and expertise of the Board's current members. The committee seeks candidates who have a history of achievement and leadership and are experienced in areas relevant to the company's business such as international trade, finance, technology, manufacturing processes and marketing. The committee also considers independence, as defined by applicable law, stock exchange listing standards and the categorical standards listed in the company's Board Governance Principles, which are set forth in the "Board Organization and Independence of its Members" section of the Principles, and which can be found on the company's website at http://www.te.com/aboutus/boardofdirectors.asp.

        The professional experience, qualifications, skills and expertise of each nominee is set forth below. The Board and the company believe that all nominees possess additional qualities, business knowledge and personal attributes valuable to their service on the Board and that all have demonstrated commitment to ethical and moral values and personal and professional integrity.

        Pierre R. Brondeau, 54, joined our Board of Directors in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International Ltd. ("Tyco International"). Dr. Brondeau has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of FMC Corporation, a global chemical company, since January 2010 and has served as Chairman of its Board of Directors since October 2010. Prior to joining FMC Corporation, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm & Haas Company, a manufacturer of specialty materials and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Dow Chemical Company, upon the April 2009 merger of Rohm & Haas Company and Dow Chemical Company, until September 2009. From 2006 to 2009, Dr. Brondeau served as Executive Vice President of electronics materials and specialty

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            15

---

Table of Contents

materials of Rohm & Haas Company. He also served as Vice-President, Business Group Executive, Electronic Materials, President and Chief Executive Officer, Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials LLC, and Regional Director, Europe, from 2003 to 2006, and previously as Vice-President, Business Group Director, Electronic Materials, President and Chief Executive Officer, Shipley Company, LLC, from 1999 to 2003. Dr. Brondeau received a master's degree from Universite de Montpellier and a Doctorate from Institut National des Sciences appliquees de Toulouse. Dr. Brondeau is a Director of Marathon Oil Corporation.

        Dr. Brondeau has over 20 years of executive leadership experience, including thirteen years of senior executive experience, at large multi-national public companies engaged in the specialty materials and chemicals industries. He has over 25 years of international business experience in the United States and Europe, and significant expertise in finance and mergers and acquisitions, as well as other areas of business.

        Juergen W. Gromer, 66, joined our Board of Directors in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International. Dr. Gromer was President of Tyco Electronics from April 1999 until he retired from that position on December 31, 2007. From September 2006 until our separation from Tyco International, he also held the position of President of the Electronic Components Business segment of Tyco International. Dr. Gromer held a number of senior executive positions over the prior ten years with AMP Incorporated, which was acquired by Tyco International in 1999. Dr. Gromer received his undergraduate degree and doctorate in physics from the University of Stuttgart. Dr. Gromer is a Director of WABCO Holdings Inc. and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. He also is Chairman of the Board of the Society for Economic Development of the District Bergstrasse/Hessen, a member of the Advisory Board of Commerzbank, and a Director of the Board and Vice President of the American Chamber of Commerce Germany.

        Dr. Gromer retired as President of Tyco Electronics with over 25 years of achievement and executive management experience with the company and its predecessor AMP and provides valuable historical perspective to the Board. Dr. Gromer holds a Ph.D. in physics which, combined with past and current directorships with publicly-held technology companies in Europe and the United States, makes him a valuable contributor to the technology vision of the company. He also has financial, governance and global leadership expertise gained from his service as a member, executive or chairman of the boards of several European financial, utility and economic organizations.

        William A. Jeffrey, 51, a nominee for director, has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of HRL Laboratories, LLC, an automotive, aerospace and defense research and development laboratory, since September 2008. From 2007 through 2008, he was the Director of the Science and Technology Division of the Institute for Defense Analyses and prior to that he was Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology from 2005. From 2002 to 2005, Dr. Jeffrey served as Senior Director of Homeland and National Security and Assistant Director of Space and Aeronautics in the Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy. He began his career at the Institute for Defense Analyses in 1988. Dr. Jeffrey holds a Ph.D. and master's degree in Astronomy from Harvard University and a bachelor of science degree in physics from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He also is Chairman of the Director's Review Committee for Global Security at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

        Dr. Jeffrey will bring exceptional technical and scientific expertise and leadership experience to the Board as CEO of a private technology research organization as well as almost 20 years of government executive experience.

        Thomas J. Lynch, 57, has served on our Board of Directors since early 2007 and as Chief Executive Officer of TE Connectivity since January 2006, and was previously President of Tyco Engineered Products and Services since joining Tyco International in September 2004. Prior to joining Tyco International, Mr. Lynch was at Motorola where he was Executive Vice President and President and Chief Executive Officer, Personal Communications Sector from August 2002 to September 2004;

16            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

Executive Vice President and President, Integrated Electronic Systems Sector from January 2001 to August 2002; Senior Vice President and General Manager, Satellite & Broadcast Network Systems, Broadband Communications Sector from February 2000 to January 2001; and Senior Vice President and General Manager, Satellite & Broadcast Network Systems, General Instrument Corporation from May 1998 to February 2000. Mr. Lynch holds a bachelor of science degree in commerce from Rider University. Mr. Lynch is a Director of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

        Mr. Lynch has extensive executive leadership experience in the electronics industry, having served as our chief executive officer for the past six years and, before that, as lead executive of business units at the company's former parent. He has gained international expertise through management of the company's world-wide presence and as a member of the U.S.-China Business Council. Mr. Lynch also serves as a member of the President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee. Mr. Lynch's education in accounting and commerce and experience on the audit, compensation and nominating committees of the board of another large corporation provide him with valuable perspective for service on our Board.

        Yong Nam, 63, a nominee for director, has served as an advisor to LG Electronics, Inc., a global provider of consumer electronics, mobile communications and home appliances, since April 2011. From 2007 through March 2011, Mr. Nam served as Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of LG Electronics. He previously served as President of LG Corp., the global conglomerate of the LG group of companies, from 2006 to 2007, and as Chief Executive Officer of LG Telecom from 1998 until 2006. Mr. Nam's 35 year career with LG began in 1976. Mr. Nam received a bachelor's degree in economics from Seoul National University. Mr. Nam is a Director of Pohang Iron and Steel Company (POSCO) and GS Retail, a South Korean retailer.

        Mr. Nam has over 35 years of international business experience in the United States and Asia with a global conglomerate where his responsibilities and focus have included strategy, marketing, information technology and operations. Mr. Nam's experience in the corporate office, telecommunications and electronics industries includes 22 years of executive leadership, of which he spent 12 years in CEO positions and four years as vice chairman. Mr. Nam's global business perspective will make him a valuable contributor to the vision of the company.

        Daniel J. Phelan, 62, joined our Board of Directors in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International. Mr. Phelan is Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of GlaxoSmithKline, a manufacturer of pharmaceuticals and consumer health-related products. He also served as Chief of Staff of GlaxoSmithKline from May 2008 until January 2011 and previously was Senior Vice President, Human Resources from 1994. As Chief of Staff, Mr. Phelan was responsible for information technology, human resources, corporate strategy and development, world wide real estate and facilities, environmental health and safety, and global security. Mr. Phelan received bachelor's and law degrees from Rutgers University and a master's degree from Ohio State University.

        Mr. Phelan brings a range of valuable expertise to the Board. He was chief of staff of a large global health products and pharmaceuticals manufacturer and has served for over 15 years in executive positions where his responsibilities have included information technology, human resource management, strategy, real estate, environmental concerns and global security. In addition, he holds a law degree and has experience advising chief executives, as well as experience in labor law and labor relations, executive compensation, mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, succession planning, leadership development, and pension and benefits design and management.

        Frederic M. Poses, 69, joined our Board of Directors as Chairman in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International. Mr. Poses is Chief Executive Officer and Partner of Ascend Performance Materials, a manufacturer of nylon related chemicals, resins and fibers for commercial and industrial products, since June 2009. He previously was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Trane Inc. (formerly American Standard Companies Inc.), a manufacturer and provider of air conditioning systems and services, vehicle control systems and bath and kitchen products, from 1999

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            17

---

Table of Contents

until its acquisition by Ingersoll Rand in 2008. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Poses was President and Chief Operating Officer of AlliedSignal, Inc., where he served in various capacities over his career, beginning in 1969. Mr. Poses holds a bachelor's degree in business administration from New York University. Mr. Poses is a Director of Raytheon Company and previously served as Chairman of Trane (formerly American Standard) from January 2000 until its acquisition by Ingersoll Rand in 2008, a Director of Centex Corporation from July 2001 until August 2009 and of WABCO Holdings Inc. for a brief period in 2007 until its spinoff.

        Mr. Poses has extensive leadership experience as chief executive officer and chairman of a large multi-national public manufacturing company for ten years and president and chief operating officer of another large global public manufacturing company. He has served as our chairman for over four years and has demonstrated significant leadership skills as a director for over ten years at several other large public companies. His business career began over 40 years ago as a financial analyst and includes over 20 years in executive management positions.

        Lawrence S. Smith, 64, joined our Board of Directors in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International. Mr. Smith was Executive Vice President from 1995 and Co-Chief Financial Officer from 2002 of Comcast Corporation, a broadband cable provider, until his retirement in March 2007, following which he consulted for Comcast Corporation until 2010. He served in finance and administration positions at Comcast from 1988 to 1995. Prior to joining Comcast, Mr. Smith was Chief Financial Officer of Advanta Corporation. He also worked for Arthur Andersen LLP for 18 years, where he was a tax partner. Mr. Smith has a bachelor's degree from Ithaca College. Mr. Smith is a Director of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and was a director of GSI Commerce from 2008 until its acquisition by eBay Inc. in 2011.

        Mr. Smith brings many years of public company experience both as chief financial officer of a large public company and by serving on the boards of international public companies. His significant experience with complex financial and operational issues combined with his knowledge of public reporting requirements and processes brings accounting, financial management and operational insight to the Board. He also has extensive mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance experience. Mr. Smith meets the SEC definition of an audit committee financial expert.

        Paula A. Sneed, 64, joined our Board of Directors in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International. Ms. Sneed is Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Phelps Prescott Group, LLC, a strategy and management consulting firm, since 2008. Previously, she was Executive Vice President of Global Marketing Resources and Initiatives for Kraft Foods, Inc., a worldwide producer of branded food and beverage products, until her retirement in December 2006. She served as Group Vice President and President of Electronic-Commerce and Marketing Services for Kraft Foods North America, part of Kraft Foods, Inc., from 2000 until 2004, and Senior Vice President, Global Marketing Resources and Initiatives from December 2004 to July 2005. She joined General Foods Corporation (which later merged with Kraft Foods) in 1977 and held a variety of general management positions. Ms. Sneed received a bachelor's degree from Simmons College and an MBA from Harvard Graduate School of Business. Ms. Sneed is a Director of Airgas Inc. and Charles Schwab Corporation.

        Ms. Sneed brings proven leadership in strategy development as CEO of a strategy and management consulting firm for four years, and previously as the executive vice president managing a global marketing division of a large public company for six years where she demonstrated expertise in all aspects of marketing and general management for over 20 years. She has over 35 years of experience in corporate and non-profit leadership roles. Ms. Sneed also has over 15 years of corporate director experience including service on audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees, bringing valuable insight to our Board. She has an MBA and meets the SEC definition of an audit committee financial expert.

        David P. Steiner, 51, joined our Board of Directors in June 2007, immediately following our separation from Tyco International. Since March 2004, Mr. Steiner has served as Chief Executive

18            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

Officer and a Director of Waste Management, Inc., a provider of integrated waste management services, and also has been its President since June 2010. His previous positions at Waste Management included Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to 2004, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from 2001 to 2003 and Vice President and Deputy General Counsel from 2000 to 2001. Mr. Steiner received a bachelor's degree from Louisiana State University and a law degree from the University of California, Los Angeles. Mr. Steiner is a Director of FedEx Corporation.

        Mr. Steiner brings thirteen years of large public company leadership experience, including seven as CEO, two as CFO, and four as general counsel or in other legal roles. As a former CFO, he brings finance experience to the Board. He also brings large public company directorship experience to the Board. Additionally, before his large public company experience, Mr. Steiner spent fourteen years in private practice at large law firms. His legal background makes him well suited to address legal and governance issues of the Board.

        John C. Van Scoter, 50, joined our Board of Directors in December 2008. Since February 2010, Mr. Van Scoter has been Chief Executive Officer and President of eSolar, Inc., a producer of modular, scalable concentrating solar thermal power technology. He also is a Director of eSolar, Inc. From 2005 through 2009, he was Senior Vice President of Texas Instruments Incorporated, a global semiconductor company. During his over 25 year career at Texas Instruments, he also held positions as General Manager of the Digital Light Processing (DLP®) Products Division and various Digital Signal Processor business units, manager of application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) product development and engineering, product engineer and technical sales engineer. Mr. Van Scoter holds a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Vermont.

        Mr. Van Scoter brings significant technology and leadership experience to the Board as CEO of a private energy technology producer and through over 25 years of management and executive positions with a large public technology company. His training in mechanical engineering and experience as a product engineer also is valuable to the Board.

        The Board of Directors has concluded that the experience, qualifications, skills and expertise described above qualify the nominees to serve as Directors of the company.

Board Diversity

        The Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee regularly reviews the composition of the Board in light of the company's businesses, strategic plan, structure and the current global business and economic environment. The Board demands the highest standards of individual and corporate integrity and is dedicated to diversity, fair treatment, mutual respect and trust. Although the Board does not have a specific board diversity policy, it is constituted of individuals possessing diverse business experience, education, vision, and industry and global market knowledge.

Shareholder Recommendations

        The Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee will consider all shareholder recommendations for candidates for the Board, which should be sent to the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee, c/o Harold G. Barksdale, Secretary, TE Connectivity, Rheinstrasse 20, CH-8200 Schaffhausen, Switzerland. In addition to considering candidates suggested by shareholders, the committee considers candidates recommended by current directors, company officers, employees and others. The committee screens all candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. The committee's review is typically based on any written materials provided with respect to the candidate. The committee determines whether the candidate meets the company's general qualifications and specific qualities and skills for directors (see above) and whether requesting additional information or an interview is appropriate.

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            19

---

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Governance Principles

        The Board of Directors' Governance Principles, which include guidelines for determining director independence and qualifications for directors, can be found on the company's website at http://www.te.com/aboutus/boardofdirectors.asp. Corporate governance developments are regularly reviewed by the Board in order to appropriately modify the Board's Governance Principles, committee charters and policies.

Board Leadership Structure

        The Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee reviews the Board's organization annually and recommends appropriate changes to the Board. To conduct its business the Board maintains three standing committees: Audit, Management Development and Compensation and Nominating, Governance and Compliance which are composed entirely of independent directors. Assignments to, and chairs of, the Audit and Management Development and Compensation Committees are recommended by the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee and selected by the Board. The independent directors as a group elect the members and the chair of the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee.

        Since its inception as a public company, the company's governance structure has included a non-executive chairman who is separate from the CEO and presides over all meetings of the Board. The Board believes that there are advantages to having a non-executive chairman for matters such as communications and relations between the Board, the CEO and other senior management and in assisting the Board in reaching consensus on particular strategies and policies.

        The Board is normally constituted of between ten and thirteen directors and is comprised of a substantial majority of independent directors. All directors are annually elected by a majority of votes cast at the annual general meeting of shareholders.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

        The Board of Directors is responsible for appraising the company's major risks and overseeing that appropriate risk management and control procedures are in place. The Board must understand the risks facing the company as a function of its strategy, provide oversight of the processes put in place to identify and manage risk and manage those risks (for example, in relation to executive compensation and succession) that only the Board is positioned to manage. The Board is responsible for determining that senior executives take the appropriate steps to manage all major risks. Management has day-to-day responsibility for assessing and managing the company's particular exposures to risk.

        The Audit Committee of the Board meets to review and discuss, as determined to be appropriate, with management, the internal auditor and the independent registered public accounting firm the company's major financial and accounting risk exposures and related policies and practices to assess and control such exposures, and assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the company's policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The company's risk assessment process was in place for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 and followed by the Board of Directors.

        The Management Development and Compensation Committee reviews the company's risks related to chief executive officer succession and succession plans for senior executives, overall compensation structure, incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, policies and programs, severance programs and change-of-control agreements and benefit programs. The committee meets, as appropriate, with the internal and/or external auditors to discuss management and employee compliance with the compensation, incentive, severance and other benefit programs and policies under the committee's jurisdiction.

20            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

        The Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee reviews the company's policies and risks related to related person transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to U.S. securities rules, the effectiveness of the company's environmental, health and safety management program, the company's enterprise-wide risk assessment processes and the company's compliance programs.

        The Board's role in risk oversight of the company is consistent with the company's leadership structure, with the CEO and other members of senior management having responsibility for assessing and managing the company's risk exposure, and the Board and its committees providing oversight in connection with those efforts.

Director Independence

        Nine of the eleven director nominees have been determined by the Board to be independent directors. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must make an affirmative determination that a director meets the stringent guidelines for independence set by the Board. These guidelines either meet or exceed the NYSE listing standards' independence requirements. The guidelines include a determination that the director has no current or prior material relationships with TE Connectivity (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company), aside from his or her directorship, that could affect his or her judgment.

        The independence guidelines also include the determination that certain limits to annual sales to or purchases from entities for which a director serves as an executive officer, and limits on direct compensation from the company for directors and certain family members (other than fees paid for board or committee service), are not exceeded and other restrictions.

        Based on the review and recommendation by the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee, the Board analyzed the independence of each director nominee and determined that the following director nominees meet the standards of independence under our director independence guidelines and applicable NYSE listing standards, and that each of them is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment: Pierre R. Brondeau, William A. Jeffrey, Yong Nam, Daniel J. Phelan, Frederic M. Poses, Lawrence S. Smith, Paula A. Sneed, David P. Steiner and John C. Van Scoter. In reaching this determination, the Board considered the fact that Mr. Nam is an advisor to, and until March 2011 was CEO and Chairman of, LG Electronics, a Korean company with which TE Connectivity made purchases totaling approximately $6.8 million and sales totaling approximately $18.3 million in fiscal 2011. Such transactions were a result of arms-length commercial dealings between the companies, which were not material individually or in the aggregate. The Board also reached this independence determination for Robert M. Hernandez, who is not standing for re-election, and also previously reached this independence determination for Ram Charan, who did not stand for re-election at our 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders.

Guide to Ethical Conduct

        All directors, officers and employees of TE Connectivity review and affirm that they understand and are in compliance with the policies and principles contained in TE Connectivity's code of ethical conduct set forth in the company's manual, "The Power of Integrity: Guide to Ethical Conduct." The guide is published in the Board of Directors section of TE Connectivity's website at http://www.te.com/aboutus/EthicalConduct.asp.

        Directors are required to promptly inform the chair of the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee of actual or potential conflicts of interest.

        TE Connectivity has an Office of the Ombudsman established by our Audit Committee which ensures a direct, confidential and impartial avenue to raise any concern or issue with compliance or ethics, including concerns about the company's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            21

---

Table of Contents

matters, with the Board. The office is designed to field compliance concerns from external constituencies—investors, suppliers and customers—as well as TE Connectivity employees.

        Reporting directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the Ombudsman's office is independent of functional management. It seeks the fair, timely and impartial resolution of all compliance and ethics issues. Employees have a number of vehicles to raise issues within TE Connectivity, including a confidential, toll-free phone number and a confidential submission system via the Internet. Concerns also may be sent directly to the Board by mail or by email.

        All concerns are received and promptly reviewed by the Ombudsman and are responded to as quickly as possible. All accounting, audit or control concerns are sent to, and will be addressed by, the Board's Audit Committee.

Communicating Concerns to Directors

        Any shareholder or interested party who wishes to contact members of the TE Connectivity Board of Directors, including the chairman or the non-management directors as a group, may do so by mailing written communications to:

TE Connectivity Board of Directors
Attn: Ombudsman
1050 Westlakes Drive
Berwyn, PA 19312

        Inquiries and concerns also can be submitted anonymously and confidentially through the Ombudsman to the TE Connectivity Board of Directors by email to directors@te.com or through the Internet at http://www.te.com/aboutus/contact_board.asp.

Voting Standards for the Election of Directors

        Directors are elected by an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present, in person or by proxy, at a general meeting of shareholders and serve until the next annual general meeting of shareholders. Any nominee for director who does not receive a majority of votes present at the meeting is not elected to the Board.

Voting Standards for Amendments to the Articles of Association

        The articles of association may be amended, in whole or in part, by the Board, subject to approval by the affirmative vote of the holders of record:

•

in the case of article 1 (with respect to domicile), article 2 (purpose), article 4 (with respect to the creation of preferred shares and an increase in capital out of equity, against contributions in kind, or for the purpose of acquisition of assets, or the granting of special privileges), article 5 (with respect to an increase in authorized share capital and the limitation or withdrawal of preemptive rights) and article 6 (with respect to an increase in conditional share capital and the limitation or withdrawal of advance subscription rights), of at least two-thirds of the share votes represented and the absolute majority of the par value of the share votes represented, in person or by proxy, at a general meeting of shareholders;



•

in the case of article 17, paragraph 5 (no shareholder action by written consent), article 18, paragraphs 3 and 4 and article 34 (provisions relating to "freeze-out" of business combinations with "interested shareholders" (as defined in the articles of association)), and article 18, paragraph 6 (80% vote requirement for certain article amendments), of 80% of the total votes of shares outstanding and entitled to vote on the relevant record date with respect thereto; and



•

in the case of all other articles, of an absolute majority of the votes represented, in person or by proxy, at a general meeting of shareholders (an "absolute majority" means at least half plus one additional vote represented at a general meeting of shareholders).

22            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND BOARD COMMITTEES

Board of Directors

        The Board of Directors currently consists of ten directors, nine of whom are nominees for election. Robert M. Hernandez has decided not to stand for re-election. Frederic Poses serves as Chairman of the Board. During fiscal 2011, there were no changes in the composition of the Board, other than the departure in March 2011 of Dr. Ram Charan, who did not stand for re-election at the 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders. The Board held eight meetings in fiscal year 2011. Six of our ten directors attended 100% and the four remaining directors attended at least 87% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which they served in fiscal year 2011. It is the policy of the Board that directors are expected to attend the annual general meeting of shareholders. All directors attended the 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders.

Board Committees

        The Board has adopted written charters for each of its three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Management Development and Compensation Committee and the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee. The charters can be found on the company's website at http://www.te.com/aboutus/boardofdirectors.asp. Each Board committee reports to the Board on their activities at each regular Board meeting.

        The Board has determined that all members of the Audit, Management Development and Compensation and Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committees are independent and satisfy the relevant SEC, NYSE and TE Connectivity additional independence requirements for the members of such committees.

Board Advisors

        Consistent with their respective charters, the Board and its committees may retain their own advisors as they determine necessary to carry out their responsibilities.

Audit Committee

        The members of the Audit Committee are directors Lawrence Smith, who chairs the committee, Pierre Brondeau and Paula Sneed. The Board has determined that each of Mr. Smith and Ms. Sneed is an "audit committee financial expert," as defined under SEC rules. The Audit Committee primarily is concerned with the quality and integrity of the company's annual and quarterly financial statements, including its financial and accounting principles, policies and practices, and its internal control over financial reporting; the qualifications, independence and performance of the company's independent registered public accounting firm and lead audit partner and the company's Swiss registered auditor; review and oversight of the company's internal audit function; compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; review of financial and accounting risk exposure; assisting the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the company's policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management; and procedures for handling complaints regarding accounting or auditing matters. The committee also oversees the company Ombudsman and the company's Guide to Ethical Conduct. The Audit Committee met eleven times in fiscal year 2011. The committee's report appears on pages 61 and 62.

Management Development and Compensation Committee

        The members of the Management Development and Compensation Committee are directors David Steiner, who chairs the committee, Robert Hernandez and Daniel Phelan. This committee is responsible to ensure succession of senior leadership; review plans for the development of the

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            23

---

Table of Contents

organization; review and approve compensation, benefits and human resources policies and objectives and whether the company's officers, directors and employees are compensated in accordance with these policies and objectives; review and approve compensation of the company's executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and recommend the Chief Executive Officer's compensation for approval by the independent members of the Board; and review and approve management incentive compensation policies and programs and equity compensation programs for employees. This committee met seven times in fiscal year 2011. The committee's report appears on page 46. Additional information on the committee's processes and procedures for consideration of executive compensation are addressed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" which follows.

Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee

        The current members of the Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee are directors Frederic Poses, who chairs the committee, and John Van Scoter. This committee's responsibilities include the selection of director nominees for the Board and the development and review of our Board Governance Principles. The committee annually reviews director compensation and benefits in conjunction with the Management Development and Compensation Committee; oversees the annual self-evaluations of the Board and its committees, as well as director performance; and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the structure and membership of the Board committees. The committee also oversees our environmental, health and safety management system and compliance programs. This committee held six meetings in fiscal year 2011.

Meetings of Non-Management Directors

        The non-management directors met without any management directors or employees present six times in fiscal year 2011. The non-executive chairman of the Board presided at these meetings.

Non-Management Directors' Compensation in Fiscal 2011

        Non-management directors' compensation is established collaboratively by the Nominating, Governance and Compliance and the Management Development and Compensation Committees. Compensation of non-management directors in fiscal year 2011 is described under "Compensation of Non-Employee Directors."

Non-Management Directors' Stock Ownership

        To help align Board and shareholder interests, directors are encouraged to own, at a minimum, TE Connectivity stock or stock units equal to three times the annual cash retainer (a total of $240,000, based on the current $80,000 annual cash retainer) within three years of joining the Board. Once a director satisfies the minimum stock ownership recommendation, the director will remain qualified, regardless of market fluctuations, under the guidelines unless the director sells shares of stock that were considered in determining that the ownership amount was met. Commencing in fiscal year 2010, each non-employee director received TE Connectivity common shares as the equity component of their compensation, with the exception of Dr. Gromer, who continued to receive deferred stock units. The deferred stock units awarded to non-employee directors in fiscal year 2011 cannot be transferred until the director leaves the Board. As of fiscal 2011 year-end, all of the directors met their stock ownership requirements.

24            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        The following table presents information with respect to our executive officers as of January 1, 2012.

        See "Nominees for Election" for additional information concerning Mr. Lynch who also is a nominee for director.

        Mario Calastri has been Senior Vice President and Treasurer of TE Connectivity since our separation from Tyco International in June 2007 and he served on the TE Connectivity Board prior to the separation. He was Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of Tyco International between 2005 and June 2007. Prior to joining Tyco International, Mr. Calastri was Vice President, Finance and Planning for IBM Global Financing EMEA in 2004 and Assistant Treasurer of IBM Corporation from 1999 to 2003.

        Alan C. Clarke has been President of Network Solutions of TE Connectivity since September 2006 and served as a Vice President of TE Connectivity since 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Clarke worked for Raychem Corporation, which was acquired by Tyco International in 1999, for 17 years in various senior management positions.

        Terrence R. Curtin has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TE Connectivity since October 2006 and he served on the TE Connectivity Board prior to the separation. Mr. Curtin previously served as Vice President and Corporate Controller since 2001. Prior to joining TE Connectivity, Mr. Curtin worked for Arthur Andersen LLP.

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            25

---

Table of Contents

        Joseph B. Donahue has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of TE Connectivity since May 2011 and President, Transportation Solutions of TE Connectivity since August 2010. He served as President, Global Automotive for the prior two years, and Senior Vice President, Global Automotive from August 2007 until then. From 2006 to August 2007, he was Group Vice President, Woodcoatings Division for Valspar Corporation, a manufacturer of commercial and industrial coating. Over the prior 16 years, Mr. Donahue held a variety of senior management roles at TE Connectivity and AMP Incorporated, leading the North America automotive business from 2001 to 2006.

        Charles P. Dougherty has been President, Communications and Industrial Solutions of TE Connectivity since January 2010. From June 2009 to December 2009, he was President, Public Safety and Professional Communications at Harris Corporation, a communications and information technology company. Previously, Mr. Dougherty was President of the Wireless Systems business of TE Connectivity from October 2006 to May 2009, when the business was sold to Harris Corporation. Prior to joining TE Connectivity, Mr. Dougherty was at Motorola for 25 years where he last served as Corporate Vice President and General Manager, Voice and Data Solutions from July 2004 and previously held a variety of senior management positions.

        Jane A. Leipold has been Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources for TE Connectivity since 2006 and was previously Vice President, Global Human Resources since 2001. She has a total of 30 years of TE Connectivity, Tyco Electronics and AMP Incorporated experience and has held various human resources, purchasing and engineering positions.

        Robert J. Ott has been Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller of TE Connectivity since our separation from Tyco International in June 2007. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Corporate Audit of Tyco International from March 2003 to June 2007 and Vice President of Finance-Corporate Governance of Tyco International from August 2002 until March 2003. Prior to joining Tyco International, Mr. Ott was Chief Financial Officer of Multiplex, Inc. from 2001 to 2002 and Chief Financial Officer of SourceAlliance, Inc. from 2000 to 2001.

        Eric J. Resch has been Senior Vice President and Chief Tax Officer of TE Connectivity since our separation from Tyco International in June 2007 and he served on the TE Connectivity Board prior to the separation. He was Vice President, Tax Reporting of Tyco International from 2003 until June 2007. Prior to joining Tyco International, Mr. Resch was Director, Tax Reporting for United Technologies Corporation from 2001 to 2003.

        Michael Robinson has been Senior Vice President, Operations of TE Connectivity since August 2007. Prior to that, he spent 27 years at United Technologies Corporation where he most recently was Vice President of Operations for the Residential and Light Commercial International business at Carrier Corporation. Mr. Robinson began his United Technologies career with Pratt & Whitney where he held a series of operations and engineering positions over 22 years.

        Robert A. Scott has been Executive Vice President and General Counsel of TE Connectivity since 2006 and prior to that was Senior Vice President, Corporate Planning for Tyco International from January 2006 and Vice President of Strategy and Business Planning for Engineered Products and Services from May 2004 to January 2006. He also served on the TE Connectivity Board prior to our separation from Tyco International in June 2007. Prior to joining Tyco International, Mr. Scott was Senior Vice President and Chief of Staff of Motorola's Integrated Electronics sector during 2002 and 2003 and Motorola's Senior Vice President of Business Integration in 2001. Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Scott was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of General Instrument Corporation.

        Robert N. Shaddock has been Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of TE Connectivity since September 2008. Previously, he was Senior Vice President of the Consumer Products

26            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

business at Motorola from August 2007 to August 2008 and prior to that he was Chief Technology Officer for Motorola's Mobile Devices business since January 2004.

        Joan E. Wainwright has been Senior Vice President, Marketing and Communications at TE Connectivity since February 2008, and Senior Vice President, Channel Business Unit, Communications and Industrial Solutions since May 2011, and she previously was Senior Vice President, Communications and Public Affairs since joining us in June 2006. Previously, she served as Vice President, Public Affairs and Vice President, Corporate Communications for Merck & Co., Inc. from June 2000 to June 2006. Ms. Wainwright also served as Deputy Commissioner of Communications for the U.S. Social Security Administration and in the communications and public relations departments of the University Health System of New Jersey, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, the University of Delaware and Villanova University.

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            27

---

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

        Our Management Development and Compensation Committee ("MDCC" or "Committee") is responsible for the establishment and oversight of our executive compensation programs. At the foundation of our executive compensation process is an executive compensation philosophy adopted by the Committee that serves as the guiding principles in the development of executive compensation levels and programs for our executive officers. In addition, the Committee has established a disciplined process for the adoption of executive compensation actions, which includes Board approval of executive compensation actions for the Chief Executive Officer and Committee approval of compensation actions for all other executive officers. All proposed compensation actions are reviewed for alignment with the company's executive compensation policy and with consideration of competitive market data (the Committee reviews competitive data from two separate peer groups) and other relevant factors discussed below. In considering proposed compensation actions, the Committee relies on a compensation consultant who is independent from management for advice, information and an objective point of view.

Fiscal 2011 Executive Compensation Highlights

        Consistent with our executive compensation process, the Committee conducted a comprehensive analysis of the competitive position of our fiscal 2010 executive pay levels and compensation programs relative to our two market peer groups. Based on that review, the Committee concluded that our executive pay levels and compensation programs are competitive relative to our peer companies and are consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. For 2011, we highlight the following:

Fiscal 2011 Say on Pay Vote Results

•

At the last annual meeting, shareholders expressed support for our executive compensation programs, with approximately 82% of shareholders voting to ratify the compensation of our named executive officers.

Overall Structure

•

We continue to structure our executive compensation programs to rely heavily on performance through the use of annual and long-term incentive programs.



•

We continue to emphasize equity awards (in the form of long-term incentive awards granted primarily in the form of stock options) as the primary component of long-term compensation for our executive officers, ensuring that pay opportunities are linked to shareholder return and to maximize share ownership by our executive officers.

Base Salaries

•

We provided base pay raises to our executive officers, effective January 1, 2011, based on the scope of their job responsibilities and performance in the context of our 2010 competitive market assessment.

28            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

Annual Incentives

•

We designed our fiscal 2011 annual incentive plan to focus on four key financial metrics to support our fiscal 2011 operating plan, and added a quantitative customer service measure to drive improved customer experience throughout our businesses.



•

Fiscal 2011 was a successful year overall for the company and most of our business units performed close to or above target performance levels; a few businesses underperformed target expectations. Consistent with our philosophy, annual incentive plan payouts to the executive officers reflected the performance of their particular business unit or overall company performance, as applicable, with limited discretion applied to recognize superior individual performance.

Long-Term Incentives

•

We maintained long-term incentive grant levels at fiscal 2010 values for approximately half of our executive officers, but increased the grant level values for the other executive officers to recognize their significant performance in fiscal 2010 and/or increased responsibilities.

Governance

•

We implemented a "clawback" provision in all executive officer fiscal 2011 incentive award agreements (both annual and long-term) such that awards are subject to clawback based on SEC rules and/or the Committee's determination that the incentive compensation awards were based on erroneous financial information.

        As we proceed into fiscal 2012, the Committee will continue to follow the disciplined executive compensation review process that it has established in order to assure that executive compensation programs remain competitive, meet the objectives of our executive compensation philosophy and deliver rewards commensurate with realized performance.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

        Our executive compensation philosophy is designed to deliver competitive total compensation, upon the achievement of individual and/or corporate performance objectives, which will attract, motivate and retain leaders who will drive the creation of shareholder value. The executive compensation philosophy has also been designed to align with the company's organization-wide total rewards strategy. The Committee reviews and administers the company's compensation and benefit programs for executive officers, including the named executive officers, and performs an annual assessment of the company's executive compensation policy. (For purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A"), "executive officer" means the Chief Executive Officer, his direct reports and any other executive officers of the company subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act.) In determining total compensation, the Committee considers the following key objectives and attributes:

        Shareholder alignment—Our executive compensation programs are designed to create shareholder value. Long-term incentive awards, which make up a significant percentage of our executives' total compensation, closely align the interests of executives with the long-term interest of our shareholders.

        Performance based—Many components of our executive compensation package are linked to performance. Annual cash incentive awards are tied to overall corporate, segment or business unit measures that allow for differentiation among our highest and lowest performing business units and

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            29

---

Table of Contents

also permit limited discretion to recognize superior business unit or individual performance. Long-term incentive awards, granted primarily in the form of stock options, are designed to reward our executive officers for the creation of long-term shareholder value.

        Appropriate Risk—Our executive compensation programs are designed to provide incentives that encourage our executive officers to take appropriate risks in managing their businesses and to provide incentives where the balance between business performance and risk is carefully achieved.

        Competitive with external talent markets—Our executive compensation programs are designed to be competitive within the various talent markets in which the company competes for executive talent. Compensation programs are designed with reference to both a general peer group of companies that compete with us for executive talent and an electronics industry peer group.

        Focus on executive stock ownership—The company has adopted the TE Connectivity Ltd. Share Ownership and Retention Requirement Plan which, together with long-term equity awards, drives executive stock ownership.

        Simple and transparent—Our executive compensation programs are designed to be readily understood by our executives and transparent to our investors.

Role of the Management Development & Compensation Committee

        The MDCC oversees the company's compensation policies and programs for executive officers, including the named executive officers. The Committee reviews, analyzes and approves the design of the company's executive compensation policies and programs, administers the company's stock incentive plans (including reviewing and approving equity incentive awards for executive officers) and reviews and approves all compensation decisions relating to the named executive officers and other executive officers of the company.

        The Committee is comprised exclusively of members who meet the independence requirements of the NYSE. Each MDCC member also is a "non-employee director" for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act and an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Role of Management

        The MDCC has established a process with management to support the development and review of executive officer compensation, as described below.

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

        The MDCC makes recommendations to the independent members of the Board regarding Chief Executive Officer compensation actions. The recommendations are based on factors deemed appropriate by the Committee, including Chief Executive Officer performance and competitive market data provided by the Committee's compensation consultant. The MDCC discusses and evaluates Chief Executive Officer compensation recommendations in an executive session attended only by the Committee members, its compensation consultant, and the Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources, who attends primarily to provide contextual information. The Chief Executive Officer does not attend the executive session when Chief Executive Officer compensation actions are discussed. The MDCC does not anticipate that management will have any role in the development of Chief Executive

30            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

Officer compensation except for providing to the MDCC or the Committee's compensation consultant relevant data relating to the Chief Executive Officer's performance and compensation history.

Other Named Executive Officer Compensation

        The Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the MDCC relating to compensation actions for the other executive officers, including the other named executive officers. The recommendations are made based on each executive officer's performance, as assessed by the Chief Executive Officer, competitive market data provided by the Committee's compensation consultant and other factors deemed relevant by the Chief Executive Officer, including but not limited to differences in the executive's responsibilities versus the role reflected in the competitive market analysis; internal pay equity and relative importance of the executive's role with the company; individual performance and contributions to strategic initiatives; level of experience; and compensation history. The Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources also is present for the discussion of compensation actions for the other named executive officers.

        The named executive officers for fiscal 2011 in addition to the Chief Executive Officer are: Terrence Curtin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Joseph Donahue, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and President, Transportation Solutions; Robert Scott, Executive Vice President and General Counsel; and Alan Clarke, President, Network Solutions. Mr. Clarke was not a named executive officer in fiscal 2010.

Role of Compensation Consultant

        Under its charter, the MDCC has the sole authority to retain consultants, counsel, accountants and others to assist in the performance of its duties, including the evaluation of executive compensation levels and programs. During fiscal year 2011, the MDCC retained Pay Governance LLC to be its independent compensation consultant.

        The compensation consultant reports directly to the MDCC and provides assistance to the Committee in developing the company's executive compensation programs and executive pay levels and generally provides advice to the Committee on executive compensation issues and trends. The MDCC independently retains its compensation consultant and has the ability to terminate its services at the Committee's discretion.

        Pay Governance is not permitted to provide any services to the company except with prior approval of the MDCC chair. During fiscal 2011, Pay Governance did not provide any services to the company outside of its services to the MDCC.

        The Committee's compensation consultant generally supports all aspects of the Committee's duties as described in its charter, which in fiscal 2011 included the following:

•

Evaluated the competitive position of the company's executive officers' total compensation packages relative to the company's peer groups for purposes of assisting the MDCC in determining compensation actions for fiscal 2011 and beyond



•

Provided advice to the Committee in the establishment of annual and long-term incentive guidelines for executive officers



•

Provided ongoing advice on the design of TE Connectivity's annual cash and long-term equity incentive programs



•

Assisted with the development of competitive global long-term incentive grant guidelines for the company's global participant population, including both executives and non-executives

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            31

---

Table of Contents

•

Briefed the MDCC on executive compensation trends among the company's peer groups



•

Provided advice to the MDCC and Nominating, Governance and Compliance Committee on director compensation levels



•

Provided advice to the MDCC on the Chief Executive Officer's compensation



•

Provided support in establishing a compensation risk assessment and reviewed the results of the assessment



•

Reviewed our peer group approach

Executive Compensation Benchmarks

        For purposes of benchmarking market practices on compensation levels for executive officers, the company has adopted a peer group framework that includes the use of a primary talent market peer group and a secondary reference group. The company believes that the two-pronged approach is the best approach for benchmarking executive compensation practices and trends, as it reflects both talent market peers and business segment competitors. The peer group structure is reviewed by the Committee on an annual basis.

        The primary talent market peer group is comprised of companies across a range of industries in which TE Connectivity competes for executive talent—as opposed to being limited to companies only in the electronics industry. Since TE Connectivity typically competes for executive talent with companies in both the electronics industry and in other industry groups, the company and Committee believe that it is appropriate to establish a benchmark peer group that sufficiently covers companies in those industries. The industries included in the primary talent market peer group are aerospace and defense, electronics and scientific equipment and industrial manufacturing. The primary talent market peer group consists of 88 companies, listed in Appendix B, with fiscal-annual revenues ranging from $482.0 million to $150.2 billion, with a median of $4.1 billion. Data obtained from this group is adjusted to reflect the relative size of TE Connectivity within the group.

        The secondary reference group is comprised of companies within the electronics industry. We use the secondary reference group as a benchmark to identify any differences in compensation practices between our industry peers and the broader primary talent market peer companies. As shown below, there are currently 17 companies in the secondary industry reference group with fiscal-annual revenues ranging from $3.0 billion to $34.3 billion, with a median of $11.0 billion.

        The benchmark data is compiled by the Committee's consultant and is used by the MDCC as a reference to ensure that our compensation levels and programs are competitive with the compensation paid by the companies that may compete with TE Connectivity for executive talent. As explained below, the benchmark data is just one of the factors used in setting executive compensation levels.

32            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation

        In evaluating compensation programs covering our executive officers, the Committee considers the potential impact on the company of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). The Committee generally intends to maximize deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) to the extent consistent with our overall compensation program objectives, while also maintaining maximum flexibility in the design of our compensation programs and in making appropriate payments to executive officers. However, the Committee reserves the right to use its independent judgment to approve nondeductible compensation, while taking into account the financial effects such action may have on the company. Section 162(m) limits the tax deduction available to public companies for annual compensation that is paid to certain of the company's executive officers in excess of $1 million, unless the compensation qualifies as performance-based or is otherwise exempt from Section 162(m). Annual incentive bonuses, stock options and other performance-based awards made to executive officers under the company's 2007 Stock and Incentive Plan are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Shareholder Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

        Although the advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation is non-binding, the Committee has considered, and will continue to consider, the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers. At our annual general meeting of shareholders held on March 9, 2011, approximately 82% of the shareholders who voted on the "say-on-pay" proposal approved the compensation of our named executive officers, while approximately 13% voted against (and approximately 5% abstained). Based on the results of the 2011 shareholder vote, the Committee believes that the company's executive compensation philosophy and the compensation paid to the named executive officers are supported by shareholders.

Compensation Overview—Process

        The company's total compensation package for executive officers, including named executive officers, is currently comprised of the following elements:

•

Base salary



•

Annual cash incentives



•

Long-term equity incentives



•

Executive benefits and perquisites



•

Broad-based retirement and health and welfare benefits

        As discussed above, the MDCC is responsible for the review and establishment of each executive officer's compensation level, except for the Chief Executive Officer. (The MDCC makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and the independent members are responsible for decisions regarding the Chief Executive Officer's compensation.) In determining the appropriate total compensation level for each executive officer, the MDCC first considers the market reference point for the executive officer, based on the 50^th percentile of our primary talent market peer group for the executive officer's particular role. (The market reference point is determined for total direct compensation and for each component of compensation—base salary, target bonus and target long-term incentive awards.) Using the reference point as the starting point in the analysis, the MDCC then considers other factors in evaluating the appropriateness of the executive's compensation level. Those factors include: differences in the executive's responsibilities versus the benchmark role; internal pay equity and relative importance of the executive's role with the company; individual performance and contributions to strategic initiatives; level of experience; and compensation history. As a result of

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            33

---

Table of Contents

the consideration of all relevant factors, actual pay positioning for each executive officer may be below or above the market reference point for total compensation and/or for one or more of the component elements of total compensation.

        In addition, in order to attract highly qualified external candidates to fill critical management roles, the MDCC may approve a total compensation package and/or individual compensation components that are above the market reference point for that candidate's position.

        In addition to base pay, annual cash incentives and long-term equity incentives, executive officers in the United States receive limited perquisites (as described below). Perquisites for executive officers outside the U.S. are based on local market practice. Broad-based employee benefit programs also are provided to executive officers on the same basis as all other employees.

        In order to assist it in setting executive compensation levels and determining the appropriateness of pay adjustments, the MDCC conducts a comprehensive assessment of total compensation at least annually, with the assistance of its compensation consultant. The assessment is completed for each executive officer and analyzes current base salary, target annual incentive opportunity, target long-term incentive opportunity, target total cash compensation (base salary and target incentive), and total direct compensation (base salary, target annual incentive opportunity and target long-term incentive opportunity) in light of current market practices, which includes comparative data from the company's primary talent market peer group. The compensation assessment for each executive officer is presented on a tally sheet which also includes the officer's compensation history, job responsibilities, tenure with the company and performance achievements. The tally sheets enable the MDCC to understand how changes in one element of an executive officer's compensation could impact the value of other elements of the executive officer's compensation and provide an overview of the relevant factors necessary to evaluate the appropriateness of an executive's officer's compensation level. Finally, as discussed above, the Chief Executive Officer provides the Committee with a more detailed performance assessment for each executive officer and makes his recommendations concerning compensation actions.

        With the information provided in the total compensation assessment as a reference, and with the input of its compensation consultant and the Chief Executive Officer (with respect to actions taken for the other executive officers), the Committee makes executive compensation determinations for our executive officers based on the analysis discussed above. The Committee and Board follow a similar process in making determinations regarding the Chief Executive Officer's compensation.

        Differences in compensation levels between our executive officers are driven by a number of factors, including the applicable market reference points specific to each executive officer's role and consideration of the factors described above (such as differences in the executive's responsibilities versus the benchmark role, internal pay equity and relative importance of the executive's role with the company, individual performance and contributions to strategic initiatives, level of experience and compensation history). An executive officer's compensation can change materially from year to year based on company performance, business unit performance, individual performance, or a role change, including promotion.

September 2011 Compensation Assessment

        In September 2011, the Committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, conducted a compensation assessment to determine the competitive position of each executive officer's fiscal 2011 base salary, annual incentive target, long-term incentive value and total direct compensation relative to the company's primary and secondary talent market peer groups. (The assessment assumed each executive officer's current base salary, target annual incentive award level and fiscal 2011 long-term incentive equity award value.) The competitive assessment indicated that the total direct compensation levels for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, fell both below and above the

34            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

applicable market reference points. While the fiscal 2011 total direct compensation levels for Messrs. Lynch, Curtin, Donahue and Clarke were positioned within ten percent of the 50^th percentile of their peer market reference points, Mr. Scott's total direct compensation level was positioned closer to the 75^th percentile. The Committee is comfortable that Mr. Scott's total compensation level is appropriate and consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. Besides his role as General Counsel of the company, Mr. Scott serves other roles in the company, including heading the company's social responsibility initiative and enterprise risk assessment process.

        The results of the September 2011 competitive compensation assessment assisted the Committee in considering whether to make base salary pay adjustments, in setting annual and long-term incentive targets for the executive officer group, and in determining actual long-term incentive grant values for the executive officers for fiscal 2012, as discussed below.

Elements of Compensation

Base salary

        Base salary provides a fixed compensation for the performance of the executive's core duties and responsibilities. Based on the competitive market assessment conducted in September 2010 and increased responsibilities being assumed as a result of business restructurings or acquisitions, the MDCC approved base salary increases for a number of executive officers, including the named executive officers, effective January 1, 2011, in order to bring their base salary levels closer to the market median. In addition, merit increases were also approved, effective January 1, 2011, to recognize superior performance over a period of years, including fiscal 2010. The following total base salary increases were approved for the named executive officers: Mr. Lynch—a 5.3% increase (from $950,000 to $1,000,000)—Mr. Lynch's last base salary increase was January 1, 2007; Mr. Curtin—a 15% increase (from $505, 875 to $582,000)—Mr. Curtin's last base salary increase was April 1, 2008; Mr. Donahue—a 10% increase (from $500,055 to $550,000)—Mr. Donahue's last base salary increase was January 1, 2010; Mr. Scott—a 5% increase (from $525,000 to $551,000)—Mr. Scott's last base salary increase was April 1, 2008; and Mr. Clarke—an 8% increase (from $406,061 to $438,546)—Mr. Clarke's last base salary increase was January 4, 2006. In conjunction with his promotion to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Donahue received a subsequent pay increase to $605,000, effective May 9, 2011.

        For fiscal 2012, no base salary adjustments or merit increases were approved for the named executive officers.

Annual Incentive Awards

        Annual incentive awards provide executive officers with a bonus opportunity if certain financial performance goals are achieved. The annual incentive program is intended to reward executive officers upon the achievement of fiscal year financial performance goals (at the corporate, segment and/or business unit level), with some limited discretion available for individual performance. The MDCC intends the company's annual incentive award program to provide market competitive awards relative to our talent market peer companies for performance achieved at predetermined target levels. Award opportunities above the target award levels are available to the extent that performance exceeds the predetermined target levels. Payments at levels below the target award levels are awarded to the extent that performance is below the pre-determined target levels. No annual incentive payments are made if threshold performance levels are not achieved, absent the occurrence of extenuating circumstances that, in the discretion of the Committee, merit an exception to the threshold performance requirement.

        The annual incentive awards will typically be structured as cash payments and were for fiscal 2011. Within 90 days of the start of each fiscal year, the Committee establishes the applicable performance criteria, which include minimum performance thresholds required to earn an award, target performance

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            35

---

Table of Contents

goals required to earn a payment of 100%, and a maximum performance level required to earn the maximum bonus permitted. If the company attains the established financial goals, executive officers will receive an award based on a target bonus percentage which is set at the beginning of each fiscal year and expressed as a percentage of the executive's base salary. The target bonus percentages for our named executive officers for fiscal 2011 were as follows: Mr. Lynch—125%; Mr. Curtin—75%; Mr. Donahue—75%; Mr. Scott—75%; and Mr. Clarke—75%.

        For fiscal 2011, the company established the following five financial and strategic measures for the annual incentive program:

Corporate Level:

Business Unit Level

        For purposes of the annual incentive program, all of the financial measures are adjusted financial measures (i.e., non-GAAP (U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measures) that exclude the effects of events deemed not reflective of the actual performance of the eligible participants. For fiscal 2011, the adjustments to EPS, Operating Income and OI Margin were as follows: (i) exclusion of the costs associated with the acquisition and integration of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. ("ADC"), (ii) exclusion of restructuring and other related charges, and (iii) exclusion of income tax benefits associated with the settlement of certain tax matters related to a prior-year audit and the related impact to other income pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement with Tyco International and Covidien plc. For fiscal 2011, the adjusted (non-GAAP) financial measure of Free Cash Flow was

36            2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement

---

Table of Contents

adjusted from cash flows from continuing operating activities, the most comparable GAAP measure, by including net capital expenditures and excluding net payments related to pre-separation tax matters.

        The performance range for payouts under the fiscal 2011 annual incentive program was set at a threshold level of 80%, a target level of 100% and a maximum level of 120% for the EPS, Operating Income and Free Cash Flow measures. For the OI Margin measures, the performance range was set at a threshold level of 90%, a target level of 100% and a maximum level of 110%. At threshold performance against the established performance measures, the earned payout would be 50% of target, and at maximum performance against the established performance measures, the earned payout would be 200% of target. For performance between the threshold and maximum levels, the earned payout would be calculated ratably between 50% and 200%, with a 100% target payout being earned at 100% performance. For performance above the 200% level, the earned payout would be calculated on the same ratable basis, but the maximum payout that could be earned under any performance measure for the fiscal 2011 annual incentive program was capped at 300%. The performance ranges for the Customer Service measures varied for each business unit and were designed to support the intended results for each business unit. The maximum payout available under the fiscal 2011 annual incentive program was capped at 200% of target.

        No individual performance metrics were assigned to any executive officer under the fiscal 2011 annual incentive program. However, the Committee reserved the discretion to adjust individual or business unit award amounts upward or downward by up to 25% based on its subjective evaluation of the individual or business unit performance during the fiscal year. However, any discretionary adjustments would be required to net out to zero. In other words, any such adjustment cannot increase the total earned annual incentive award pool available for payout. In addition, the Committee reserved an additional discretionary award pool of $7.8 million (10% of the total target annual incentive award pool amount, i.e., the total amount that would be paid if all participants received a payout at 100% of target) which, with the Committee's approval, could be used in whole or part to reward exceptional performance at either the business unit or individual level regardless of the performance results against the established financial measures.

        Fiscal 2011 performance targets, actual attainment and corresponding annual incentive award results at the corporate level and for the Transportation Solutions and Network Solutions business units (for Mr. Donahue and Mr. Clarke, respectively) were as follows:

Corporate Level: Messrs. Lynch, Curtin and Scott

2012 Annual General Meeting Proxy Statement            37

---

Table of Contents

---

*

The target performance levels and results for the Transportation Solutions business unit and the Customer Service metrics are confidential information. The company has determined that disclosure of the performance targets and results for a business unit like Transportation Solutions that operates primarily in a singular defined market would result in competitive harm to the company. Likewise, the disclosure of the performance targets and results for the Customer Service metrics for the business units and the overall corporate results would result in competitive harm to the company.

---

*

The amounts included in the "Other Compensation" column for Mr. Donahue include his cash perquisite allowance, rental housing payments and company car related expenses, but exclude the value of the other benefits paid on Mr. Donahue's behalf as a result of his assignment in Germany, as described in footnote (a) of the "All Other Compensation" table in the Summary Compensation Table section of this proxy statement.

---

*

Represents the percentage of the employee's compensation, which for purposes of the RSIP, generally includes base salary and annual incentive awards paid to the employee.

---

⁽¹⁾

Amounts shown are not reduced to reflect the named executive officers' elections, if any, to defer receipt of salary into the SSRP.

⁽²⁾

This amount represents the grant date fair value of restricted stock units ("RSUs") calculated using the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation.

⁽³⁾

This amount represents the grant date fair value of stock options calculated using the provisions of ASC 718. See Note 22 (Share Plans) to the notes to consolidated financial statements ("Note 22") set forth in TE Connectivity's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 (the "10-K") for the assumptions made in determining ASC 718 grant date fair values.

⁽⁴⁾

Represents amounts earned under the fiscal 2011 annual incentive program. Amounts shown are not reduced to reflect the named executive officers' elections, if any, to defer receipt of awards into the SSRP.

⁽⁵⁾

Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of the accumulated benefits for Messrs. Donahue and Clarke under their frozen pension plans as described in "CD&A—Elements of Compensation—Retirement and Deferred Compensation Benefits." Messrs. Lynch, Curtin and Scott do not participate in a pension plan. There are no nonqualified deferred compensation earnings because the SSRP does not provide for "above-market" or preferential earnings as defined in applicable SEC rules.

⁽⁶⁾

See the All Other Compensation table below for a breakdown of amounts shown in column (i) which include perquisites and company match on employee contributions to the employee stock purchase plan, the company's 401(k) plan and nonqualified defined contribution plan, dividend equivalent units and other amounts. Amounts shown for 2009 for Messrs. Curtin and Scott (and total amounts for 2009) have been adjusted from the amounts disclosed in our proxy statement for the 2011 annual general meeting of shareholders to correct immaterial administrative errors made in the calculation of the company contributions to the nonqualified defined contribution plan in 2009. The amounts reflected in the table for perquisites are the company's incremental cost. The company also provides group life, health, hospitalization and medical reimbursement plans which do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of officers and are available to all full-time employees; the values of the benefits are not shown in the table. Amounts for Mr. Lynch for fiscal 2010 and 2009 also reflect adjustments made ($11,007 for 2010 and $10,823 for 2009) for non-business use of the company's aircraft, as described in more detail below in footnote (a) to the All Other Compensation table.

⁽⁷⁾

Mr. Clarke's salary and bonus are paid in Great Britain pounds (GBP). To convert compensation values to USD, the average monthly conversion rates as determined by TE Connectivity finance were used. The following is the conversion rate for the above table: USD 1.6018175:GBP 1.

---

(a)

Amounts reflect a cash perquisite allowance under the executive flexible perquisites allowance program which provides executives a cash allowance of 10% of base salary. The amount for Mr. Lynch also includes $27,817 for non-business use of our aircraft. We own an aircraft that we use for business purposes. Mr. Lynch uses the aircraft for business purposes, but occasionally will make a non-business related stop while on a business trip, or will travel on the aircraft to attend meetings of the Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. board of directors, of which he is a member. The incremental cost to us of Mr. Lynch's non-business use of our aircraft was calculated to include the direct variable costs and the value of the lost corporate tax benefits associated with a non-business related stop and travel on the aircraft to attend Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. board meetings. The amount for Mr. Donahue, who is an expatriate residing in Germany, also includes benefits payable under our expatriate policy. We maintain an expatriate policy under which employees who are asked to relocate from their home country in connection with their work assignments are reimbursed for certain costs and expenses associated with relocating to, and living in, another country. Mr. Clarke's perquisites include the incremental cost to the company of the lease value of a company car along with associated taxes. In addition, Mr. Clarke was provided with a car allowance and tax preparation.

Amounts greater than $25,000 for Mr. Donahue are:

Amounts less than $25,000 for Mr. Donahue are comprised of home leave costs, dependent education tuition, housing management fees, tax preparation services, utility allowance, storage costs and repatriation costs which totaled $90,926. Tax allowances are provided to individuals on expatriate assignments to make their assignments effectively tax and cost neutral to them. Under these arrangements, the company paid on behalf of Mr. Donahue foreign taxes in the amount of $479,944 (net of amounts withheld from his base pay under the tax equalization program) for services performed in Germany in fiscal 2011. The company also provided Mr. Donahue with tax gross-up payments of $141,973 for calendar 2010; gross-up amounts for calendar 2011 are not determined until the end of calendar year 2011. Due to the timing of payments in fiscal 2011, the following range of exchange rates, primarily as determined by TE Connectivity finance, were used to convert amounts reported or paid in euros to U.S. dollars: USD1.32103—USD1.44109:EUR 1.

(b)

Represents the additional income reported for participation in a company paid split dollar life insurance program.

(c)

Represents the value of dividend equivalent units credited in the fiscal year to each individual's unvested RSUs using the closing price on the date of the crediting.

(d)

Represents the company matching contribution made under the TE Connectivity employee stock purchase plan.

(e)

Reflects contributions made on behalf of the named executive officers under TE Connectivity's qualified defined contribution plan and accruals on behalf of the named executive officers under the SSRP (a nonqualified defined contribution excess plan), as follows:

---

^(*)

Included in Mr. Donahue's amount is an additional supplemental contribution of $5,390 as a result of a frozen defined benefit plan.

---

⁽¹⁾

The "Threshold" column represents the minimum amount payable (50% of target payout) when threshold performance is met. The "Target" column represents the amount payable (100% of target payout) if the specified performance targets are reached. The "Maximum" column represents the maximum amount payable (200% of target payout). See "CD&A—Elements of Compensation—Annual Incentive Awards."

⁽²⁾

This column shows the number of RSUs granted in fiscal 2011 to the named executive officers. The grants vest equally over four years starting on the first anniversary date.

⁽³⁾

This column shows the number of stock options granted in fiscal 2011 to the named executive officers. Stock options issued have a ten-year term and vest ratably over a four-year period, with 25% becoming vested and exercisable on each anniversary of the grant date.

⁽⁴⁾

This column shows the full grant date fair value of RSUs and stock options under ASC 718 granted to the named executive officers in fiscal 2011. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, see Note 22 in the 10-K. In determining the number of stock options and RSUs that are awarded to eligible equity award participants, including each named executive officer, the company follows an established policy under which it uses the average daily closing price in the month preceding grant as the applicable value. For purposes of the fiscal 2011 equity awards reflected in the table above, the applicable stock value used to determine the number of stock option shares and RSUs awarded to each named executive officer was $30.66 per share for the November grant (which was the average daily closing price for October, the month before the November 8, 2010 grant) and $36.57 for the June grant (Mr. Donahue's grant). The value of the award shown in this column, however, is based on the grant date closing price, $33.73 per share for the November grant and $35.90 per share for the June grant, as applicable.