Plug Power Form Pre-14A

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

 

Filed by the Registrant 

T

                           Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

¨

Check the appropriate box:
 

T

Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

¨

Definitive Proxy Statement

¨

Definitive Additional Materials

¨

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

  

Plug Power Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

 

 

 

T

No fee required.

¨

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

(4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

(5)   Total fee paid:

 

 

¨

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

 

¨

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)    Amount Previously Paid:

 

(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

(3)    Filing Party:

 

(4)    Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMPORTANT VOTING INFORMATION

 

STOCKHOLDERS MAY REQUEST ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF PROXY DOCUMENTS.

 

The Company has made our Annual Meeting materials available to Stockholders on the Internet via www.proxyvote.com or via sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.  Upon request, printed versions or e-mail versions of these materials will be made available to Stockholders through www.proxyvote.com, by telephoning 1-800-579-1639 or by emailing sendmaterial@proxyvote.com.  Further instructions to shareholders can be found on the notice.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING ADMISSION TO THE 2014 ANNUAL MEETING

 

In accordance with our security procedures, all stockholders attending the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must present valid picture identification upon entry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

PLUG POWER INC.

968 Albany Shaker Road

Latham, NY 12110

June [__], 2014

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Plug Power Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be held on Wednesday, July 23, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of Goodwin Procter LLP, The New York Times Building, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018.

 

The Annual Meeting has been called for the purpose of (i) the election of two Class III Directors, each for a three-year term; (ii) the approval of an amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as described in the accompanying proxy statement; (iii) the approval of an amendment of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by 205,000,000 shares; (iv) the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, compensation tables and narrative discussion set forth in the accompanying proxy statement; (v) the ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2014; and (vi) such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 6, 2014, as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Board of Directors of the Company recommends that you vote:

1.

“FOR” the election of the two nominees as Class III Directors of the Company as described in the accompanying proxy statement;

2.

“FOR” the approval of an Amendment and Restatement of the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan as described in the accompanying proxy statement;

3.

“FOR” the approval of the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by 205,000,000 shares.

4.

“FOR” the approval of the advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the accompanying proxy statement;

5.

“FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2014.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THE PROXY MATERIALS AND THEN CAST YOUR VOTE, REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES YOU HOLD. IF YOU ARE A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD YOU MAY VOTE OVER THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE, OR BY REQUESTING A COPY OF THE PROXY MATERIALS BY MAIL AND SIGNING, DATING AND MAILING THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD IN THE RETURN ENVELOPE, OR BY ATTENDING THE MEETING AND VOTING IN PERSON. IN ANY EVENT, TO BE SURE THAT YOUR VOTE WILL BE RECEIVED IN TIME, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE BY YOUR CHOICE OF AVAILABLE MEANS AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU WISH, EVEN IF YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY VOTED BY PROXY. 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

  Sincerely,
  

Andrew Marsh

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PLUG POWER INC.

968 Albany Shaker Road

Latham, NY 12110

(518) 782-7700

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on Wednesday, July 23, 2014

 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Plug Power Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on Wednesday, July 23, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.  Eastern Time, at the offices of Goodwin Procter LLP, The New York Times Building, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 (the “Annual Meeting”) for the purpose of considering and voting upon:

1.

The election of two Class III Directors each to hold office until the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier resignation or removal;

2.

To consider and approve an amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan;

3.

To consider and approve the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by 205,000,000 shares;

4.

To consider and approve an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

5.

The ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2014; and

6.

Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 6, 2014 as the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only holders of the Company’s common stock of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Any action may be taken on the foregoing matters at the Annual Meeting on the date specified above, or on any date or dates to which, by original or later postponement or adjournment, the Annual Meeting may be postponed or adjourned.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

  

Gerard L. Conway, Jr.

Corporate Secretary

 

Latham, NY

June [__], 2014

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

PLUG POWER INC.

968 Albany Shaker Road

Latham, NY 12110

(518) 782-7700

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on Wednesday July 23, 2014

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Plug Power Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on Wednesday, July 23, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time, at the offices of Goodwin Procter LLP, The New York Times Building, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018, and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). 

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:
 

1.

The election of two Class III Directors each to hold office until the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier resignation or removal;

2.

To consider and approve an amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan;

3.

To consider and approve the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by 205,000,000 shares;

4.

To consider and approve an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

5.

The ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for 2014; and

6.

Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.  

The Notice of Annual Meeting and instructions for accessing proxy materials as well as casting proxy votes are first being furnished to stockholders of the Company on or about June [__], 2014 in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on June 6, 2014 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting (the “Record Date”). Only holders of record of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) and holders of the Company’s Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock , par value $ 0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were [_________] shares of Common Stock and 10,431 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.  As of the record date, there were approximately [_____] holders of record of the Common Stock and one holder of record of the Preferred Stock. However, management believes that a significant number of shares of Common Stock are held by brokers under a “nominee name” and that the number of beneficial stockholders of the Common Stock exceeds [_____].  Each share of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date is entitled to one vote and each share of Preferred Stock outstanding on the Record Date is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into which such share of Preferred Stock is convertible as of the Record Date.

 

The presence, in person or by proxy, of a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock (treating the Preferred Stock on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum being present, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter is necessary to elect a nominee as a director of the Company.  “Withhold authority” votes, “abstentions” and “broker non-votes” will be counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.  A “withhold authority” vote is a stockholder’s vote to withhold authority to cast a vote “for” the election of one or more director nominees. An “abstention” represents an affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal other than the election of directors. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power under applicable law with respect to that proposal and has not received instructions with respect to that proposal from the beneficial owner.

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

With respect to the election of a director, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from the nominee. With respect to Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5, stockholders may cast a vote in favor of or against, or abstain from voting on, each proposal.  Proposal 1, election of two Class III directors, shall be determined by a plurality vote, which means the two nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes at the Annual Meeting will be elected as directors.

For Proposal 2, approval of an amendment and restatement the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, Proposal 4, approval of an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in the accompanying proxy statement and Proposal 5, ratification of the independent auditors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast for and against such matter is required for approval.  For Proposal 3, approval of an amendment of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock (treating the Preferred Stock on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) is required for approval.  For Proposals 2, 4 and 5, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the number of votes cast for and against the proposal and therefore have no effect on the vote on such proposal. For Proposal 3, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as having been voted for the proposal and therefore will have the same effect as negative votes.

If you hold shares through a broker, bank or other custodian (also referred to as holding shares in “street-name”), only such broker, bank, custodian or other nominee can vote your shares. In order to ensure that your shares are voted at the Annual Meeting, you must give specific instructions regarding how to vote your shares. If you do not give specific instructions regarding how to vote your shares, the broker, bank, custodian or other nominee may not exercise their discretion to vote your shares.

 

Stockholders of the Company are requested to vote over the internet, by telephone, or by requesting a copy of the proxy materials and by signing, dating and mailing the accompanying Proxy Card in the return envelope or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Stockholders who hold shares indirectly as the beneficial owner of shares held for them by a broker or other nominee (i.e., “in street name”) may direct their vote without attending the Annual Meeting by submitting voting instructions to their broker or nominee.

 

Common Stock represented by properly executed proxies received by the Company and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions contained therein. If instructions are not given therein, properly executed proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of the two nominees of the Board of Directors as Class III Directors of the Company (Proposal 1); “FOR” the approval of the Amendment and Restatement of the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (Proposal 2); “FOR” the approval of the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (Proposal 3); “FOR” the approval of the advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 4); and “FOR” the ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors for 2014 (Proposal 5), as described in this Proxy Statement.  It is not anticipated that any matters other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If other matters are presented, proxies will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders.

 

Any properly completed proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted on any matter (without, however, affecting any vote taken prior to such revocation) by (1) giving written notice of such revocation to the Corporate Secretary of the Company, (2) submitting a new proxy by telephone, internet or proxy card after the date of the previously submitted proxy (or submitting new voting instructions with respect to shares held in street name), or (3) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

 

A notice with instructions for accessing proxy materials via the internet or receipt by mail is being furnished to stockholders of the Company concurrently with the Notice of Annual Stockholder Meeting.

 

  

 

 

6

 

 

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Introduction

At the Annual Meeting, two Class III Directors will be elected to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2017 and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier resignation or removal. The Board of Directors has nominated Larry G. Garberding and Douglas T. Hickey for re-election as Class III Directors.  Shares represented by each properly executed proxy will be voted for the re-election of Larry G. Garberding and Douglas T. Hickey as directors, unless contrary instructions are set forth on such proxy. Each nominee has agreed to stand for re-election and to serve, if elected, as a director.  However, if any nominee fails to stand for re-election or is unable to accept election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend. 

 

Vote Required

 

A quorum being present, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast is necessary to elect a nominee as a director of the Company. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect on the vote. Broker non-votes will also have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS CLASS III DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY.

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR DIRECTORS

The number of directors of the Company is presently fixed at ten (10), and the Board of Directors currently consists of ten (10) members. The Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with three (3) directors in Class I, four (4) directors in Class II, and three (3) directors in Class III.  Directors in Classes I, II and III serve for three-year terms with one class of directors being elected by the Company’s stockholders at each Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board of Directors has nominated Larry G. Garberding and Douglas T. Hickey for re-election as Class III Directors.  The Board determined that Evgeny Miroshnichenko would not be nominated for re-election at the Annual Meeting and his term as a director will expire at the Annual Meeting on July 23, 2014.  

The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Helmer and Messrs. Garberding, McNamee, Willis, Hickey, Roth and Kenausis are independent directors as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) under the Marketplace Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (the “NASDAQ Rules”).  

The positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board are currently each filled by a different individual, Andrew Marsh and George McNamee, respectively.  If the position of Chairman of the Board is vacant, or if he or she is absent, the Chief Executive Officer presides, when present, at meetings of stockholders and of the Board of Directors.

 Set forth below is certain information regarding the directors of the Company, including the two Class III Directors who have been nominated for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The ages of and biographical information regarding the nominees for re-election and each director who is not standing for election is based on information furnished to the Company by each nominee and director and is as of May 31, 2014.

 

 

 

  

 

 

7

 

  

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Director
Since

 

Class I—Term Expires 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Marsh

58

2008

 

 

 

Gary K. Willis (1)(2)

67

2003

 

 

 

Maureen O. Helmer (1)(3)

57

2004

 

 

 

Class II—Term Expires 2016

 

 

 

 

 

George C. McNamee (2)

67

1997

 

 

 

Johannes M. Roth

   35

  2013

 

 

 

Xavier Pontone

   39

  2013

 

 

 

Gregory L. Kenausis

   45

  2013

 

 

 

Class III—Term Expires 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Larry G. Garberding (1)(3)*

75

1997

 

 

 

Douglas T. Hickey (1)(2)(3)*

59

2011

 

 

 

Evgeny Miroshnichenko

33

2011

 

 

 

_______________________

*

Nominee for re-election.

(1)

Member of the Audit Committee.

(2)

Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3)

Member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

  

The principal occupation and business experience for at least the last five years for each director of the Company is set forth below.  The biographies of each of the directors below contains information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director. 

 

 

8

 

 

Andrew J. Marsh has served as Chief Executive Officer, President and member of the Board of Directors of the Company since April 8, 2008. Previously, Mr. Marsh was a co-founder of Valere Power, where he served as CEO and Board Member from the Company’s inception in 2001 through its sale to Eltek ASA in 2007. Under his leadership, Valere grew into a profitable global operation with over 200 employees and $90 million in revenues derived from the sale of DC power products to the telecommunications sector. During Mr. Marsh’s tenure, Valere Power received many awards such as the Tech Titan award as the fastest growing technology company in the Dallas Fort Worth area and the Red Herring Top 100 Innovator Award. Prior to founding Valere, he spent almost 18 years with Lucent Bell Laboratories in a variety of sales and technical management positions. Mr. Marsh is a member of the board of directors of the California Hydrogen Business Council, a non-profit group comprised of organizations and individuals in the business of hydrogen.  Mr. Marsh holds a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering Technology from Temple University, a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Duke University and a Masters of Business Administration from Southern Methodist University.  We believe Mr. Marsh’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his record of success in leadership positions in technology companies having attributes similar to our Company, his extensive experience in management positions as well as his educational background in engineering and business administration.

Gary K. Willis has been a director of the Company since 2003. Mr. Willis joined Zygo Corporation’s Board of Directors in June 2009 after retiring as Chairman of the Board of Directors in November 2000, having served in that capacity since November 1998. Zygo Corporation is a provider of metrology, optics, optical assembly, and systems solutions to the semiconductor, optical manufacturing, and industrial/automotive markets. Mr. Willis had been a director of Zygo Corporation since February 1992 and also served as President from 1992 to 1999 and as Chief Executive Officer from 1993 to 1999. Prior to joining Zygo Corporation, Mr. Willis served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Foxboro Company, a manufacturer of process control instruments and systems. Mr. Willis is also a director of Rofin-Sinar Technologies, Inc. and Middlesex Health Services, Inc. Mr. Willis holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. We believe Mr. Willis’ qualifications to sit on our Board include his extensive experience in management and director positions with similar companies as well as his educational background in mechanical engineering.

Maureen O. Helmer has been a director of the Company since 2004. Maureen O. Helmer is currently a member of the law firm Hiscock & Barclay LLP and is the Chair of the firm’s Regulatory Practice Group. Prior to her joining Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Ms. Helmer was a member of Green & Seifter Attorneys, PLLC. From 2003 through 2006 she practiced as a partner in the law firm of Couch White, LLP and then as a solo practitioner. In addition to serving as Chair of the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) from 1998 to 2003, Ms. Helmer also served as Chair of the New York State Board on Electric Generation Siting and the Environment. Ms. Helmer has advised international energy, telecommunications and industrial companies on policy and government affairs issues. Prior to her appointment as Chair, Ms. Helmer served as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission from 1997 until 1998 and was General Counsel to the Department of the Public Service Commission from 1995 through 1997. From 1984 through 1995, Ms. Helmer held several positions in the New York Legislature. She also served as a board member of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, the New York State Environmental Board and the New York State Disaster Preparedness Commission during her tenure as Chair of the PSC. In addition, she was Vice Chair of the Electricity Committee of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners and a member of the NARUC Board of Directors. She was also appointed to serve as a member of the New York State Cyber-Security Task Force. Ms. Helmer earned her Bachelor of Science from the State University at Albany and her Juris Doctorate from the University of Buffalo law school. She is admitted to practice law in New York. We believe Ms. Helmer’s qualifications to sit on our Board include her long history of experience with energy regulation, policy and government affairs and advising energy and industrial companies.

George C. McNamee serves as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and has served as such since 1997. Mr. McNamee is a Director of iRobot Corporation (IRBT). He was previously Chairman of First Albany Companies (now GLCH) and a Managing Partner of FA Tech Ventures, an information and energy technology venture capital firm. Mr. McNamee’s background in investment banking has given him broad exposure to many financing and merger and acquisition issues. As an executive, he has dealt with rapid-growth companies, technological change, crisis management, team building and strategy. As a public company director, Mr. McNamee has led board special committees, chaired audit committees, chaired three boards and has been an active lead director. Mr. McNamee has previously served on public company boards, including Mechanical Technology Inc. (MTI) and Home Shopping Network (HSN). He has been an early stage investor, director and mentor for private companies that subsequently went public including MapInfo (now Pitney Bowes), META Group (now Gartner Group) and iRobot. He served as a NYSE director from 1999 to 2004 and chaired its foundation. In the aftermath of the 1987 stock market crash, he chaired the Group of Thirty Committee to reform the Clearance and Settlement System. Mr. McNamee has been active as a director or trustee of civic organizations including The Albany Academies and Albany Medical Center, whose finance Committee he chaired for a dozen years. He is also a director of several private companies, a member of the Yale Development Board and a Trustee of The American Friends of Eton College. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University. We believe Mr. McNamee’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his experience serving on countless boards, his background in investment banking and experience with the financial sector and its regulatory bodies.

 

 

9

 

Johannes M. Roth has been a director since April 2013. Mr. Roth is the founder and, since 2006, has been Managing Director and Chairman of FiveT Capital Holding AG, an investment holding company based in Switzerland with businesses specializing in asset management, risk management and alternative investments. Since 2006, Mr. Roth has been a board member of FiveT Capital AG, Zürich, Switzerland, which advises several long-only funds and operates an asset management business for high net-worth individuals. We believe Mr. Roth’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his background in financial investments, financial and risk management and equity capital markets as well as his experience in management positions.

Xavier Pontone has been a director since October 2013. He is a director designee of Air Liquide Investissements d’Avenir et de Démonstration pursuant to the terms of Air Liquide’s investment in the Company as described below under Item 13 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE. Since September 2013, Mr. Pontone has been the Managing Director of Air Liquide Advanced Business, where he leads a team that develops new growth opportunities with a focus on hydrogen mobility, biogas and energy transition. Mr. Pontone sits on the board of directors of Hypulsion, the Company’s joint venture with Axane, S.A. (an Air Liquide subsidiary). Mr. Pontone also sits on the boards of both Air Liquide Advanced Technologies and Axane. He is Vice President of AFHYPAC (French association for hydrogen and fuel cells). Mr. Pontone previously served as Manager of Operations Control Center of Air Liquide Belgium Industries where he managed operations of 12 large industrial gas production plants and associated industrial gas product networks. Prior to Air Liquide Belgium Industries, Mr. Pontone held a Business Management role in Western Canada for Air Liquide Canada. We believe Mr. Pontone’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his senior management experience in the hydrogen mobility and energy space, in European markets and with our Hypulsion joint venture.  

Gregory L. Kenausis has been a director since October 2013. Mr. Kenausis is the founding partner and since 2005 has been the Chief Investment Officer of Grand Haven Capital AG, an investment firm with $40 million of assets under management, where he is the head of trading activity and research and is responsible for managing the fund’s structure. We believe Mr. Kenausis’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his background and senior level experience in financial investments, trading and management and equity capital markets.

Larry G. Garberding has served as a director of the Company since 1997. Mr. Garberding was a Director and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DTE Energy Company and the Detroit Edison Company from 1990 until retiring in 2001. Mr. Garberding was a Certified Public Accountant, a partner with a major public accounting firm, and has been on the board of several corporations, having had responsibility for financial, operational, regulatory and sales activities. Mr. Garberding received a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Administration from Iowa State University. We believe Mr. Garberding’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his extensive experience with power and energy companies and his background in accounting, financing and operations.

Douglas T. Hickey has served as a director of the Company since October 2011. Mr. Hickey previously sat on Plug Power’s Board from September 1, 2000 to April 24, 2006. Mr. Hickey currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of BinWise, Inc. since 2012. Prior to BinWise, from 2000 to 2011, Mr. Hickey was Managing Director at Hummer Winblad Venture Partners (HWVP), one of the nation’s leading software venture capital firms. Prior to joining HWVP, Mr. Hickey served as CEO for Critical Path, Inc., where during his tenure revenue grew from less than $1M to more than $150M and the company earned Forbes.com Number-One Fastest Growing Company Award in 2000. Mr. Hickey previously held the CEO and President position for Global Center Inc., where, he grew revenue from zero to more than $50M of recurring revenue and achieved profitability. His focus on the company’s strategy enabled rapid growth, securing customers like Yahoo, Netscape and Oracle, ultimately leading to the successful sale of the company to Frontier Communications, (NYSE:FRO). Prior to Global Center, Mr. Hickey was CEO and President of MFS DataNet, the leading supplier of data related services to internet service providers and enterprise customers worldwide. MFS grew to more than $1 billion in revenue and subsequently completed a successful IPO and trade sale. We believe Mr. Hickey’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his extensive corporate leadership experience and his proven background growing revenue.

 Evgeny Miroshnichenko has been a director since October 2011. Mr. Miroshnichenko is the Director for Strategic Development for INTER RAO UES (the “Group”). He is responsible for organization of strategic management process, development and implementation of corporate strategy, realization of strategic projects, as well as management of financial investments of the Group. Mr. Miroshnichenko has also built solid experience in corporate governance as he has held director positions in Boards of Directors in a number of Russian electricity companies. We believe Mr. Miroshnichenko’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his experience with strategic corporate projects and background in financial investment management and corporate governance.

 

 

10

 

COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

  

The Board of Directors of the Company held nine meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (“Fiscal 2013”). The Board of Directors has established three standing committees, an Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”), a Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”), and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “Governance Committee”). During Fiscal 2013, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (1) the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company (held during the period for which he or she has been a director) and (2) the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board of Directors of the Company on which the director served (during the periods that he or she served).

 

Discussed below in greater detail, the Board of Directors administers its risk oversight function directly and through its Audit Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.  The Board and each of these Committees regularly discuss with management our major risk exposures, their potential financial impact on Plug Power and the steps we take to manage them.  The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of Company risks relating to accounting matters, financial reporting and legal and regulatory compliance, while the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for oversight of risks relating to management and Board succession planning, stakeholder responses to the Company’s ethics and business practices.

 

The Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel report to the Board of Directors regarding ongoing risk management activities at the regularly scheduled, quarterly Board of Directors meetings and may report on risk management activities more frequently, as appropriate.  Additionally, risk management is a standing agenda item for the regularly scheduled, quarterly Audit Committee meetings.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Garberding (Chair), Willis and Hickey, and Ms. Helmer. The Audit Committee held four meetings during Fiscal 2013 and each member attended all of the meetings during the period in which such person served on the committee.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is currently composed of four directors, each of whom is an independent director as defined in the NASDAQ Rules and the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In addition, the Board of Directors has made a determination that Mr. Garberding qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the applicable rules of the SEC. Mr. Garberding’s designation by the Board as an “audit committee financial expert” is not intended to be a representation that he is an expert for any purpose as a result of such designation, nor is it intended to impose on him any duties, obligations, or liability greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on him as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board in the absence of such designation.

The Audit Committee’s primary responsibility is for oversight of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of the Company’s financial statements. A more complete description of the Audit Committee’s functions is set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter which is published on the “Investors” section of the Company’s website at www.plugpower.com.

In accordance with the Audit Committee’s charter, management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including maintaining an adequate system of internal controls over financial reporting. The Company’s independent auditors, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), report directly to the Audit Committee and are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The Audit Committee, among other matters, is responsible for (i) appointing the Company’s independent auditors, (ii) evaluating such independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance, (iii) determining the compensation for such independent auditors, and (iv) approving all audit and non-audit services. Additionally, the Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of the Company’s financial statements including the work of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee reports to the Board of Directors with regard to:

 

 

 

11

 

 

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management of the Company and KPMG, the Company’s 2013 quarterly unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and 2013 annual consolidated financial statements, including management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Management has represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Additionally, the Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG any matters required to be discussed under professional standards which include, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee has also discussed the critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that KPMG discussed with management, if any, the ramifications of using such alternative treatments and other written communications between KPMG and management.

KPMG has provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requirements for independent accountant communications with audit committees concerning auditor independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with KPMG that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee has also concluded that KPMG’s performance of non-audit services is compatible with KPMG’s independence.

The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG their overall scope and plans for their audit and met with KPMG, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their audit and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee also discussed with KPMG whether there were any audit problems or difficulties, and management’s response.

 

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board has approved, the inclusion of audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who constitute the Audit Committee:

 

Larry G. Garberding (Chairman)

Maureen O. Helmer

Gary K. Willis

Douglas Hickey

 

Independent Auditors Fees

 

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by KPMG:

 

                                                                                                                                   

 

KPMG

 

2013

2012

Audit Fees

$325,000

$310,000

Audit-Related Fees

$239,500

51,500

Tax Fees

-

-

 

 

 

Other

-

-

Total

$564,500

$361,500

 

 

12

 

 

In the above table, and in accordance with SEC definitions and rules: (1) “audit fees” are fees for professional services for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-K, review of unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-Qs, or for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; (2) “audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements; (3) “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning; and (4) “all other fees” are fees for any services not included in the first three categories.

 

The Audit Committee approved all audit and non-audit services provided to the Company by KPMG during Fiscal 2013.

 

Compensation Committee

 

 The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Willis (Chair), McNamee and Hickey, each of whom is an independent director under the NASDAQ Rules. The Compensation Committee held three meetings during Fiscal 2013. See “Report of the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” for a further description of the activities of the Compensation Committee in Fiscal 2013. The Compensation Committee’s primary responsibilities include (i) discharging the responsibilities of the Board of Directors of the Company relating to compensation of the Company’s executive officers, (ii) providing oversight of the Company’s benefit, perquisite and employee equity programs, and (iii) reviewing the adequacy of the Company’s management succession plans. A more complete description of the Compensation Committee’s functions is set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter which is published on the “Investors” section of the Company’s website at www.plugpower.com.  

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “Governance Committee”) consists of Ms. Helmer (Chair) and Messrs. Garberding and Hickey, each of whom is an independent director under the NASDAQ Rules. The Governance Committee held three meetings during Fiscal 2013. The Governance Committee’s responsibilities include (i) establishing criteria for Board and committee membership, (ii) considering director nominations consistent with the requirement that a majority of the Board be comprised of independent directors as defined in the NASDAQ Rules, (iii) identifying individuals qualified to become board members, and (iv) selecting the director nominees for election at each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Governance Committee is also responsible for developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and periodically reviewing such guidelines and recommending any changes thereto. A more complete description of the Governance Committee’s functions is set forth in the Governance Committee’s charter which is published on the “Investors” section of the Company’s website at www.plugpower.com.  

 

Director Compensation

The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the Company’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) to ensure that the compensation aligns the directors’ interests with the long-term interests of the stockholders and that the structure of the compensation is simple, transparent and easy for stockholders to understand. The Compensation Committee also considers whether the Plan fairly compensates the Company’s directors when considering the work required in a company of the size and scope of the Company. Employee directors do not receive additional compensation for their services as directors.

 

13

 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the Plan, upon initial election or appointment to the Board of Directors, new non-employee directors receive non-qualified stock options to purchase 65,000 shares (50,000 shares for any new non-employee Chairman) of Common Stock with an exercise price equal to fair market value on the date of grant and that become fully vested and exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the grant. Each year of a non-employee director’s tenure, the director will receive non-qualified options to purchase 10,000 shares (15,000 shares for any non-employee Chairman), plus non-qualified options to purchase an additional 5,000 shares if the director serves as chairman of the Audit Committee and non-qualified options to purchase an additional 2,000 shares if the director serves as chairman of any other committee, including the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. These annual options have an exercise price equal to fair market value on the grant date and become fully vested and exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the grant.  

 

Under the Plan, each non-employee director is paid an annual retainer of $40,000 ($85,000 for any non-employee Chairman) for their services. Committee members receive additional annual retainers in accordance with the following table:

 

 

 

Committee

 

Chairman

 

Member

 

Audit Committee

$             20,000

$             15,000

 

 

 

Compensation Committee

15,000

5,000

 

 

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

10,000

5,000

These additional payments for service on a committee are due to the workload and broad-based responsibilities of the committees. The total amount of the annual retainers are paid in a combination of fifty percent (50%) cash and fifty percent (50%) Common Stock, with the ability to receive up to one hundred percent (100%) Common Stock, at the election of the non-employee director.  At the Board’s discretion, directors may receive up to eighty percent (80%) of their annual retainers in cash. All Common Stock issued for the annual retainers is fully vested at the time of issuance and is valued at its fair market value on the date of issuance. Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their direct expenses associated with their attendance at board meetings.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table

The following table provides information for non-employee directors who served during Fiscal 2013.

 

 

Fees Earned or Paid in

 

 

 

Name

Cash ($)

Stock Awards (1) ($)

Option Awards (2) ($)

Total ($)

Douglas Hickey

31,250

31,251

3,480

65,981

Evgeny Miroshnichenko

20,000

20,000

2,900

42,900

Evgeny Rasskazov (3)

10,000

10,000

-

20,000

Gary Willis

8,750

61,251

3,480

73,481

George McNamee

18,000

72,001

4,350

94,351

Gregory Kenausis

3,805

3,805

30,550

38,160

Johannes Minoh Roth

17,926

17,927

12,000

47,853

Larry Garberding

32,500

32,500

4,350

69,350

Maureen Helmer

30,000

30,000

2,900

62,900

Xavier Pontone

3,805

3,805

30,550

38,160

 

1)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock award computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. Fair value is calculated using the closing price of Plug Power stock on the date of grant. Stock awards granted to directors vest immediately.  For additional information on stock awards, refer to note 14 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC. These amounts reflect the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the non-employee directors.

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

2)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the option award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.  Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures.  For additional information on the valuation assumptions with respect to option awards, refer to note 6 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC.  These amounts reflect the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the non-employee directors.  As of December 31, 2013, the non-employee directors held options to purchase shares of Common Stock as follows: Douglas Hickey (91,000),  Evgeny Miroshnichenko (10,000), Gary Willis (111,100), George McNamee (132,000), Gregory Kenausis (65,000), Johannes Minoh Roth (75,000), Larry Garberding (119,500), Maureen Helmer (106,700) and Xavier Pontone (65,000).
 

 
3)

Evgeny Rasskazov resigned from the Board of Directors as of June 28, 2013.

 

Policy Governing Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Board of Directors has adopted a formal policy that all directors are expected to attend the Company’s Annual Meetings of Stockholders in person, unless doing so is impracticable due to unavoidable conflicts. At the time of the 2013 Annual Meeting, the Company had nine directors and each director, other than Evgeny Miroshnichenko and Evgeny Rasskazov, attended the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Policies Governing Director Nominations

Securityholder Recommendations

The Governance Committee’s current policy with regard to the consideration of director candidates recommended by securityholders is that it will review and consider any director candidates who have been recommended by one or more of the stockholders of the Company entitled to vote in the election of directors in compliance with the procedures established from time to time by the Governance Committee. All securityholder recommendations for director candidates must be submitted to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Latham, New York 12110, who will forward all recommendations to the Governance Committee. We did not receive any securityholder recommendations for director candidates for election at the 2014 Annual Meeting. All securityholder recommendations for director candidates for election at the Company’s 2015 annual meeting must be submitted to the Company’s Corporate Secretary on or before April 24, 2015 and must include the following information:

 

 

15

 

 Board Membership Criteria

The Governance Committee has established criteria for membership on the Board of Directors. These criteria include the following specific, minimum qualifications that the Governance Committee believes must be met by a Governance Committee-recommended nominee for a position on the Board of Directors:

In addition to the minimum qualifications for each nominee set forth above, the Governance Committee will recommend that the Board of Directors select persons for nomination to help ensure that:

         Finally, in addition to any other standards the Governance Committee may deem appropriate from time to time for the overall structure and composition of the Board of Directors, the Governance Committee, when recommending that the Board of Directors select persons for nomination, may consider whether the nominee has direct experience in the industry or in the markets in which the Company operates.

The Governance Committee will recommend to the Board of Directors the nomination of the director candidates who it believes will, together with the existing members of the Board of Directors and other nominees, best serve the interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees

 

In considering whether to recommend any candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, including candidates recommended by shareholders, the Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will apply the criteria set forth in Plug Power’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. These criteria include the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, age, experience, commitment, diligence, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all shareholders.  Our Corporate Governance Guidelines specify that the value of diversity on the Board should be considered by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee in the director identification and nomination process. The Committee seeks nominees with a broad diversity of experience, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds. The Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. The Company believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. Nominees are not discriminated against on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis proscribed by law.  For a more comprehensive discussion of our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s current policy with regard to the consideration of director candidates, please refer to the section of this document titled “Policies Governing Director Nominations.”

 

To review the effectiveness of assessing the diverse skills, qualifications and backgrounds of Director Nominations, the Board of Directors and each of the three standing Board Committees conduct annual self-evaluations. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee monitors the effectiveness of these procedures on an ongoing basis.

  

 

16

 

 

Contacting the Board of Directors

 

 

You may contact any director of the Company by writing to them c/o Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Latham, New York 12110, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Your letter should clearly specify the name of the individual director or group of directors to whom your letter is addressed. Any communications received in this manner will be forwarded as addressed.

 

 

 

17

 

 

INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The names and ages of all executive officers of the Company and the principal occupation and business experience for at least the last five years for each are set forth below. The ages of and biographical information regarding each executive officer is based on information furnished to the Company by each executive officer and is as of May 31, 2014.

 

 

 

 

Executive Officers

 

Age

 

Position

 

 

 

 

Andrew Marsh

58

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

 

 

David P. Waldek

49

Interim Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Keith C. Schmid

51

Chief Operating Officer

 

 

 

Jill McCoskey

46

Chief Accounting Officer

 

 

Gerard L. Conway, Jr.

49

General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Senior Vice President

 

 

 

Erik Hansen

42

Senior Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

The biographies of each of the executive officers below contains information regarding the person’s service as an executive, business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the person should serve as an executive officer.

Andrew Marsh’s biographical information can be found in the section entitled “Information about our Directors” in this Proxy Statement.

David P. Waldek has been a founding partner of CFO Advisory Group, LLC, financial and business solutions advisory firm, since 2005. Prior to founding CFO Advisory Group, Mr. Waldek served as Chief Financial Officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc., a publicly held drug discovery and development company, from March 1999 to November 2004. While at Albany Molecular Research, Inc., he was responsible for development and execution of the company’s financial and strategic vision with operation responsibility over finance, business development investor relations, information technology and facilitates management. Mr. Waldek holds a Bachelors of Science Degree in Economics from the University of Rochester and an M.B.A in Finance from the William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration.

Keith C. Schmid joined Plug Power Inc. as Chief Operating Officer in 2013. Mr. Schmid served as President of SPS Solutions, a power solutions and energy storage consulting firm, from 2011 to 2013. Previously, Mr. Schmid served as CEO of Boston-Power Incorporated, a provider of large format lithium ion battery solutions, in 2011, and as President and CEO of Power Distribution Incorporated, a power distribution and protection company, from 2007 to 2010. In addition, Mr. Schmid held the position of General Manager, Industrial Energy Division- Americas for Exide Technologies from 2001 to 2007. Mr. Schmid holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering and an M.B.A. from the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

 

 

18

 

Jill McCoskey joined Plug Power Inc. as Controller in 2008 and was appointed Chief Accounting Officer in April of 2013. Prior to that, she served as the Controller of Consolidations and Financial Reporting at Philips Medical Systems MR Inc. from November 2006 to December 2007. Her responsibilities at Philips Medical Systems MR Inc. included leading the corporate accounting department as well as consolidating and reporting on the financial operations of the business. She holds a Bachelors of Science Degree in Accounting from Clarkson University, and an M.B.A. from the University at Albany, State University of New York.   

Gerard L. Conway, Jr. has served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since September 2004 and, since March 2009, has also served as Senior Vice President. In that capacity, Mr. Conway is responsible for advising the Company on legal issues such as corporate law, securities, contracts, strategic alliances and intellectual property. He also serves as the Compliance Officer for securities matters affecting the Company. During his tenure, Mr. Conway served as Vice President of Government Relations from 2005 to June 2008 and in that capacity he advocated on energy issues, policies, legislation and regulations on the state, federal, national and international levels on behalf of the Company and the alternative energy sector. Prior to his appointment to his current position, Mr. Conway served as Associate General Counsel and Director of Government Relations for the Company beginning in July 2000. Prior to joining Plug Power, Mr. Conway spent four years as an Associate with Featherstonhaugh, Conway, Wiley & Clyne, LLP, where he concentrated in government relations, business and corporate law. Mr. Conway has more than nineteen years of experience in general business, corporate real estate and government relations. Mr. Conway holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and Philosophy from Colgate University and a Juris Doctorate from Boston University School of Law.

Erik Hansen joined Plug Power Inc. as Vice President of Business Development in 2008 and was appointed Senior Vice President in October of 2009. Mr. Hansen is responsible for directing the sales of the Company. Mr. Hansen has more than 15 years of experience with cutting edge technologies related to energy storage systems. Prior to joining Plug Power, he was General Manager of Sales and Systems Engineering for Cobasys LLC in Orion, Michigan, where he worked for eight years. In that role, Mr. Hansen led the decision-making and strategic planning for the manufacture and sales of advanced energy storage solutions for both the transportation and uninterruptible power systems. Mr. Hansen holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Engineering, both from West Virginia University.

 Subject to any terms of any employment agreement with the Company (as further described in this Proxy Statement), each of the executive officers holds his or her respective office until the regular annual meeting of the Board of Directors following the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

We provide what we believe is a competitive total compensation package to our executive management team through a combination of base salary, annual incentive bonuses, long-term equity incentive compensation, and broad-based benefits programs. We place emphasis on pay-for-performance based incentive compensation, which is designed to reward our executives based on the achievement of predetermined performance goals. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains our compensation objectives, policies and practices with respect to each individual serving as our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer during 2013, the three most highly-compensated executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and an additional individual for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that he was not serving as an executive officer of the Company at the end of 2013, who are collectively referred to as the “named executive officers.”

 

Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Programs

Our compensation programs for our named executive officers are designed to achieve the following objectives:

 

 

19

 

 

Our Executive Compensation Programs

 

Our executive compensation primarily consists of base salary, annual incentive bonuses, long-term equity incentive compensation and broad-based benefits programs.  Consistent with the emphasis we place on pay-for-performance based incentive compensation, long-term equity incentive compensation in the form of stock options and restricted stock constitute a significant portion of our total executive compensation. 

Within the context of the overall objectives of our compensation programs, our Compensation Committee determined the specific amounts of compensation to be paid to each of our executives in 2013 based on a number of factors, including:

Each of the primary elements of our executive compensation is discussed in detail below, including a description of the particular element and how it fits into our overall executive compensation.  Compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2013 is discussed under each element.  In the descriptions below, we have identified particular compensation objectives which we have designed our executive compensation programs to serve; however, we have designed our compensation programs to complement each other and to collectively serve all of our executive compensation objectives described above.  Accordingly, whether or not specifically mentioned below, we believe that, as a part of our overall executive compensation, each element to a greater or lesser extent serves each of our objectives. 

Base Salary

We pay our executives a base salary which we review and determine annually.  We believe that a competitive base salary is a necessary element of any compensation program designed to attract and retain talented and experienced executives.  We also believe that attractive base salaries can motivate and reward executives for their overall performance.  Base salaries are, in part, established based on the individual experience, skills, expected contributions of our executives, and our executives’ performance during the prior year. 

 

 

20

 

After a review of 2012 base salaries, we did not increase the annual base salaries of our named executive officers for 2013. Base salaries for 2013 were as follows: Mr. Marsh – $450,000, Mr. Conway – $250,000, Ms. McCoskey—$153,500, Mr. Hansen—$230,000, Mr. Andersen – $300,000, and Mr. Corless – $230,000 In April 2013, we engaged CFO Advisory Group to provide the services of Mr. Waldek to serve as our Interim Chief Financial Officer at a daily rate of $1,250. For 2013, we paid a total of $113,021 to CFO Advisory Group for the services of Mr. Waldek. In October 2013, we hired Mr. Schmid as our Chief Operating Officer with an initial annual base salary of $300,000. Our executives’ base salaries reflect the initial base salaries that we negotiated with each of our executives at the time of his or her initial employment or promotion and our subsequent adjustments to these amounts to reflect market increases, the growth and stage of development of our Company, our executives’ performance and increased experience, any changes in our executives’ roles and responsibilities, and other factors. The initial base salaries that we negotiated with our executives were based on our understanding of the market at the time, the individual experience and skills of, and expected contribution from, each executive, the roles and responsibilities of the executive, the base salaries of our existing executives, and other factors.

 

Annual Incentive Bonuses

Our named executive officers are eligible to receive annual incentive bonuses based on our pay-for-performance incentive compensation program. They are eligible to receive annual incentive bonuses primarily based upon their performance as measured against predetermined individual performance goals, including financial measures, achievement of strategic objectives, and other factors. The primary objective of this program is to motivate and reward our named executive officers for meeting individual performance goals. We do not believe that every important aspect of executive performance is capable of being specifically quantified in a predetermined performance goal. For example, events outside of our control may occur after we have established the named executive officers’ individual performance goals for the year that require our named executive officers to focus their attention on different or other strategic initiatives; thus, the individual performance goals may be modified during the fiscal year by the President and Chief Executive Officer, or the Board of Directors in the case of the President and Chief Executive Officer himself, to account for such events.

Within our pay-for-performance incentive compensation program, specific performance attainment levels are indicated for each performance goal. These performance attainment levels correlate to potential bonus award amounts that are calculated as a percentage of each executive’s base salary.

We established threshold, target and stretch attainment levels for each of our named executive officers based on a percentage of his or her base salary. For Mr. Marsh, the attainment levels were set at 17%, 56% and 83% of his base salary. For Mr. Hansen, the attainment levels were set at 43%, 109% and 163% of his base salary. For each other named executive officer, the attainment levels were set at 10%, 20% and 30% of his or her base salary. Mr. Hansen’s potential bonus levels were set significantly higher primarily because of his sales-focused role, the importance of sales growth to the Company’s strategy and our belief that a greater portion of his compensation should be tied to a performance-based incentive. Because the annual incentive bonuses are payable based on the achievement of each of several different performance goals, the executive officer may earn a bonus in an amount equal to between 0% and 30% (or 83% and 163% in the case of Mr. Marsh and Mr. Hansen, respectively) of his base salary given his actual performance. If a performance goal is not met, then the executive does not earn the portion of the bonus award attributable to that objective. The 20% (or 56% and 109% in the case of Mr. Marsh and Mr. Hansen, respectively) attainment level is considered the target level for each performance goal because it is challenging for the executive to attain, and the executive would meet expectations if he achieved this level. The 10% (or 17% and 43% in the case of Mr. Marsh and Mr. Hansen, respectively) attainment level is considered the threshold level for each performance goal because although still challenging, it is the minimum acceptable performance level. The 30% (or 83% and 163% in the case of Mr. Marsh and Mr. Hansen, respectively) attainment level is considered the maximum, or stretch, level for each performance goal because it is most challenging for the executive to attain, and the executive would need to exceed expectations to achieve this level. The maximum and threshold performance attainment levels are determined in relation to the target attainment levels and are intended to provide for correspondingly greater or lesser incentives in the event that performance is within an appropriate range above or below the target performance attainment level.

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

In order to link each executive’s performance to corporate-wide strategy, the executives’ individual performance goals directly correlate to our corporate milestones, which are recommended by management and adopted or modified by the Board of Directors after appropriate consideration and review. The executives’ individual performance goals are determined in the same way as the corporate milestones such that management reviews how each executive may contribute to the corporate milestones and recommends individual performance goals to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors, after appropriate consideration and review, approves or modifies the individual performance goals. For 2013, the individual performance goals, as well as the corporate milestones, included (i) annual and quarterly product order targets, (ii) revenue, (iii) addition and expansion of large customer accounts and (iv) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash charges for equity compensation (EBITDAS). Each performance goal is given a relative weighting for each executive such that the achievement of (or failure to achieve) certain objectives has a greater impact on the potential bonus award. For 2013, the goals were weighted as follows: for Mr. Marsh, order targets – 50%, revenue – 25%, EBITDAS – 25%, for Mr. Hansen, order targets – 40%, large customers – 40%, revenue – 20%, and each other named executive officer, order targets – 25%, revenue – 25%, EBITDAS – 25%, large customers – 25%. Because disclosure of the specific individual performance goals would give competitors information that could be leveraged for competitive advantage, we do not disclose these specific individual performance goals or our executives’ actual performance against such goals.

After completion of the fiscal year, initially the Chief Executive Officer and other members of management, as appropriate, make a recommendation to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors for each executive’s potential bonus amount based on his level of attainment of each of his individual performance goals (with the exception of the Chief Executive Officer himself whose level of attainment is evaluated by the Compensation Committee directly). The Board of Directors, after review and discussion and recommendation from the Compensation Committee, determines the final level of attainment for each executive’s individual performance goals.

In 2013, Mr. Marsh earned a bonus of $93,750, or 20.8% of his annual base salary. Ms. McCoskey earned a bonus of $11,252, or 7.33% of her annual base salary. Mr. Conway earned a bonus of $18,325, or 7.33% of his annual base salary. Mr. Hansen earned a bonus of $140,000, or 60.9% of his annual base salary, and Mr. Corless earned a bonus of $22,067, or 9.6% of his annual base salary. Mr. Andersen did not receive a bonus. Annual bonus awards made to the named executive officers in 2014 for performance in 2013 are reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the “Summary Compensation Table”.

Outside of the incentive bonus plan, we determined to pay Ms. McCoskey a discretionary bonus in the amount of $100,000 in connection with her appointment as Chief Accounting Officer and the increased responsibilities that accompany that position.

 

 

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

We grant long-term equity incentive awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock to executives as part of our total compensation package. Consistent with our emphasis on pay-for-performance based incentive compensation, these awards represent a significant portion of total executive compensation. Based on the stage of our Company’s development and the incentives we aim to provide to our executives, we have chosen to use either stock options or a combination of stock options and restricted stock as our long-term equity incentive awards. Our decisions regarding the amount and type of long-term equity incentive compensation and relative weighting of these awards among total executive compensation have also been based on our understanding of market practices of similarly situated companies and our negotiations with our executives in connection with their initial employment or promotion by our Company.

Additionally, the Board of Directors adopted stock ownership guidelines for executives, including the named executive officers, and these guidelines are also considered when granting long-term equity incentive awards to executives. The ownership guidelines provide a target level of Company equity holdings with which named executive officers are expected to comply within five (5) years from the later of the effective date of the guidelines (August 2005) or the date the individual is first appointed as an executive. The target stock holdings are determined as a multiple of the named executive officer’s base salary (5x for the Chief Executive Officer and 3x for the other named executive officers) and then converted to a fixed number of shares using a 200-day average stock price. The following shares count in determining compliance with the stock ownership guidelines: (i) shares owned outright by the executive or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; (ii) shares held in the Plug Power Inc. Savings and Retirement Plan; (iii) restricted stock issued as part of an executive’s annual or other bonus whether or not vested; (iv) shares acquired upon the exercise of employee stock options; (v) shares underlying unexercised employee stock options times a factor of thirty-three percent; and (vi) shares held in trust. The named executive officers are currently in compliance with stock ownership guidelines.

Stock option awards provide our executive officers with the right to purchase shares of our common stock at a fixed exercise price typically for a period of up to ten years, subject to continued employment with our Company. Stock options are earned on the basis of continued service and generally vest over three years, beginning with one-third vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third vesting on the second anniversary of the grant date and the final one-third vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to acceleration in certain circumstances. Stock option awards are made pursuant to our 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Except as may otherwise be provided in the applicable stock option award agreement, stock option awards become fully exercisable upon a change of control. The exercise price of each stock option is the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market as of the option grant date.

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

Grants to new hires and grants relating to an existing executive officer’s promotion may be made on a periodic basis.  All grants to executive officers are approved by the Compensation Committee.  We consider a number of factors in determining the number of stock options, if any, to grant to our executives, including:

Restricted stock awards provide our executive officers with a long-term incentive alternative to the stock option awards. Restricted stock awards vest subject to both continued employment of the executive by the Company and either time-based vesting or vesting based on satisfaction of specified performance objectives.

In October 2009, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board of Directors approved a Long Term Incentive (LTI) Plan (the “LTI Plan”). Designed as an incentive vehicle to support employee efforts, the LTI Plan sought to increase shareholder value by encouraging Plug Power employees to continue to work diligently to further the Company’s long term goals.

Under the LTI Plan, a select group of critical employees, including Messrs. Marsh, Conway, Hansen, Corless and Andersen, received a one-time grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) calculated using a multiple of the employee’s base salary. Under the terms of the RSU grant, the restrictions on each participant’s RSU allocation lapse over a three-year period upon successful completion of weighted performance-based metrics. Specifically, restrictions on 25% of RSUs were tied to the Company’s achievement of revenue targets, while the restrictions on 75% of RSUs were tied to the Company’s achievement of earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash charges for equity compensation (“EBITDAS”) targets. If the Company fails to achieve any of the articulated performance-based metrics for a fiscal year, a percentage of the total RSUs are forfeited for that fiscal year.

In 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, none of the revenue or EBITDAS performance-based metrics were reached. Accordingly, no restrictions lapsed with respect to any performance period under the LTI Plan and all of the RSUs awarded under the LTI Plan were forfeited.

Broad-Based Benefits

All full-time employees, including our named executive officers, may participate in our health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental, and vision care coverage, disability insurance and life insurance, and our 401(k) plan.

Relationship of Executive Compensation to Risk

The Compensation Committee considers whether the design of the Company’s executive compensation program encourages senior executives to engage in excessive risk-taking. The Compensation Committee reviews the overall program design, as well as the balance between short-term and long-term compensation, the metrics used to measure performance and the award opportunity under the Company’s incentive compensation program, and the implementation of other administrative features designed to mitigate risk such as vesting requirements and stock ownership guidelines as described above. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s executive compensation program is aligned to the interests of stockholders, appropriately rewards pay for performance, and does not promote unnecessary and excessive risk.

 

Our Executive Compensation Process

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for determining the compensation for our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of non-employee directors who are “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable NASDAQ rules. In determining executive compensation, our Compensation Committee annually reviews the performance of our executives with our Chief Executive Officer, and our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to our Compensation Committee with respect to the appropriate base salary, annual incentive bonuses and performance measures, and grants of long-term equity incentive awards for each of our executives. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with regards to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation. The Compensation Committee makes its determination regarding executive compensation and then recommends such determination to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors ultimately approves executive compensation.

 

23

 

As a result, the total amount of compensation that we paid to our executives, the types of executive compensation programs we maintained, and the amount of compensation paid to our executives under each program has been determined by our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors based on their understanding of the market, experience in making these types of decisions, and judgment regarding the appropriate amounts and types of executive compensation to provide. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant in 2013.

 

Summary Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities awarded to, earned by or paid in the last three fiscal years to the Company’s named executive officers.

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Non-Equity

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Principal Position

  

Year

 

  

Salary ($)

 

 

Bonus ($)

 

  

Stock
Awards ($)

 

  

Option
Awards ($)

 

  

Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)

 

  

All Other
Compensation ($)

 

 

Total ($)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

(1)

 

  

(2)

 

  

(3)

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

Andrew Marsh

  

 

2013

  

  

 

450,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

135,667

  

  

 

58,000

  

  

 

93,750

  

  

 

15,266

(4) 

 

 

752,683

  

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

  

 

2012

  

  

 

443,654

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

14,758

(4) 

 

 

458,412

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

375,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

740,588

  

  

 

121,125

  

  

 

14,276

(4) 

 

 

1,250,989

  

Gerald A. Anderson (5)

  

 

2013

  

  

 

107,885

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

32,936

(6) 

 

 

140,821

  

Former Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

  

 

2012

  

  

 

327,462

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

10,002

(6) 

 

 

337,464

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

300,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

421,708

  

  

 

57,000

  

  

 

9,507

(6) 

 

 

788,215

  

David Waldek (7)

  

 

2013

  

  

 

113,021

(8) 

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

113,013

  

Interim Chief Financial Officer

  

 

2012

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

Jill McCoskey (9)

  

 

2013

  

  

 

150,500

  

 

 

100,000

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

43,500

  

  

 

11,252

  

  

 

7,705

  

 

 

312,957

  

Chief Accounting Officer

  

 

2012

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

Gerard L. Conway, Jr.

  

 

2013

  

  

 

250,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

12,334

  

  

 

58,000

  

  

 

18,325

  

  

 

10,757

(10) 

 

 

349,416

  

General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Senior Vice President

  

 

2012

  

  

 

245,769

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

180

(10) 

 

 

245,949

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

200,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

245,130

  

  

 

38,000

  

  

 

180

(10) 

 

 

483,310

  

Erik J. Hansen

  

 

2013

  

  

 

230,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

43,167

  

  

 

58,000

  

  

 

140,000

  

  

 

11,620

(11) 

 

 

482,787

  

Senior Vice President

  

 

2012

  

  

 

230,000

  

 

 

43,700

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

11,399

(11) 

 

 

285,099

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

230,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

245,130

  

  

 

251,700

  

  

 

175,784

(11) 

 

 

902,614

  

Adrian Corless (12)

  

 

2013

  

  

 

248,657

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

12,334

  

  

 

58,000

  

  

 

22,067

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

341,058

  

Former Chief Technology Officer, Senior Vice President

  

 

2012

  

  

 

228,731

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

180

  

 

 

228,911

  

  

 

2011

  

  

 

215,000

  

 

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

245,130

  

  

 

40,850

  

  

 

5,215

  

 

 

506,195

  

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

(1)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. Fair value is calculated using the closing price of Plug Power stock on the date of grant. For additional information on stock awards, refer to note 14 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC. These amounts reflect the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executives.

 

 

(2)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the option award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures. For additional information on the valuation assumptions with respect to option awards, refer to note 6 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC. These amounts reflect the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executives.

 

 

(3)    

This column represents the dollar amount of bonuses paid to executives under a non-equity incentive plan.

 

 

(4)    

Includes the Company’s share of contributions on behalf of Mr. Marsh to the Plug Power 401(k) savings plan in the amount of $14,750, $14,242 and $13,760, in the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and payments of $516 for supplemental life insurance premiums in each of the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

 

(5)    

Mr. Anderson was the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President until he resigned effective April 26, 2013.

 

 

(6)    

Includes the Company’s share of contributions on behalf of Mr. Anderson to the Plug Power 401(k) savings plan in the amount of $6,706, $9,486, and $9,231 in the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, payments of $0, $516, and $276 for supplemental life insurance premiums in the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and payment of $26,230 for earned but unused vacation time in the year 2013.

 

 

(7)    

Mr. Waldek was hired as Interim Chief Financial Officer effective April 16, 2013.

 

 

(8)    

Reflects the amount paid to CFO Advisory Group for the services of Mr. Waldek.

 

 

(9)    

Ms. McCoskey was named Chief Accounting Officer effective April 16, 2013.

 

 

(10)

Includes the Company’s share of contributions on behalf of Mr. Conway to the Plug Power 401(k) savings plan in the amount of $10,577 in the year ended 2013, and payments of $180 for supplemental life insurance premiums in each of the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011. 

 

 

(11)

Includes the Company’s share of contributions on behalf of Mr. Hansen to the Plug Power 401(k) savings plan in the amount of $11,500, $11,279 and $9,246 in the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, payment of $166,418 for moving and relocation expenses in 2011, and payments of $120 for supplemental life insurance premiums in each of the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

 

(12)

Mr. Corless was the Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President until he resigned effective November 8, 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

25

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other

 

 

Option

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards:

 

 

Awards:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

Number of

 

 

Exercise or

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares of

 

 

Securities

 

 

Base Price of

 

 

Fair Value of

 

 

 

Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards

 

 

 

 

 

Stock or Units

 

 

Underlying

 

 

Option

 

 

Option

 

Name

 

Threshold ($)

 

 

Target ($)

 

 

Stretch ($)

 

 

Grant Date

 

 

(#)

 

 

Options (#)

 

 

Awards ($/Sh)

 

 

Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

(2)

 

 

(3)

 

 

(4)

 

Andrew Marsh

 

 

76,500

  

 

 

153,000

  

 

 

225,000

  

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

366,667

  

 

 

 

 

135,667

  

 

 

 

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

 

200,000

  

 

 

0.37

  

 

 

58,000

  

Gerry Anderson

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

David Waldek

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

Jill McCoskey

 

 

15,350

  

 

 

30,700

  

 

 

46,050

  

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

 

150,000

  

 

 

0.37

  

 

 

43,500

  

Gerard L. Conway, Jr.

 

 

25,000

  

 

 

50,000

  

 

 

75,000

  

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

33,334

  

 

 

 

 

12,334

  

 

 

 

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

 

200,000

  

 

 

0.37

  

 

 

58,000

  

Erik J. Hansen

 

 

100,000

  

 

 

250000

  

 

 

375,000

  

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

116,667

  

 

 

 

 

43,167

  

 

 

 

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

 

200,000

  

 

 

0.37

  

 

 

58,000

  

Adrian Corless

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

—  

  

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

33,334

  

 

 

 

 

12,334

  

 

 

 

 

 

07/24/13

  

 

 

 

200,000

  

 

 

0.37

  

 

 

58,000

  

 

 

1)

This column shows the number of restricted shares granted in 2013 to the named executive.  The restrictions lapse ratably in three equal annual installments, beginning one year from the date of grant.
2)

This column shows the number of stock options granted in 2013 to the named executives.  These options generally vest and become exercisable ratably in three equal annual installments, beginning one year from the date of grant.
3)

This column shows the per share exercise price for the stock options granted, which was the closing price of Plug Power common stock on the date of grant.
4)

This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock awards and option awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures.  For additional information on the valuation assumptions with respect to option awards, refer to note 6 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC. These amounts reflect the Company’s accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executives.

 

 

  

 

 

 

26

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table provides information on the holdings of stock options and stock awards by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2013. For additional information about the option awards and stock awards, see the description of equity incentive compensation in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

 

  

Option Awards

 

  

Stock Awards

 

 

  

Number of

 

  

Number of

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

Securities

 

  

Securities

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Market Value

 

 

  

Underlying

 

  

Underlying

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Number of

 

  

of Shares of

 

 

  

Unexercised

 

  

Unexercised

 

  

Option

 

  

Option

 

  

Shares of Stock

 

  

Stock That

 

 

  

Options (#)

 

  

Options (#)

 

  

Exercise

 

  

Expiration

 

  

That Have Not

 

  

Have Not

 

Name

  

Exercisable

 

  

Unexercisable

 

  

Price ($)

 

  

Date

 

  

Vested (#) (1)

 

  

Vested ($) (2)

 

Andrew Marsh

  

 

40,000

  

  

  

 

35.80

  

  

 

04/08/18

  

  

  

  

 

250

  

  

  

 

9.50

  

  

 

05/20/19

  

  

  

  

 

71,067

  

  

 

35,533

  

  

 

6.10

  

  

 

04/13/21

  

  

  

  

 

133,333

  

  

 

66,667

  

  

 

2.17

  

  

 

12/13/21

  

  

  

  

  

 

200,000

  

  

 

0.37

  

  

 

07/24/23

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

366,667

  

  

 

568,334

  

Gerald A. Anderson

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

David Waldek

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

Jill McCoskey

  

 

1,500

  

  

  

 

26.00

  

  

 

01/24/18

  

  

  

  

 

250

  

  

  

 

9.50

  

  

 

05/20/19

  

  

  

  

 

9,567

  

  

 

4,783

  

  

 

6.10

  

  

 

04/13/21

  

  

  

  

 

13,333

  

  

 

6,667

  

  

 

2.17

  

  

 

12/13/21

  

  

  

  

  

 

150,000

  

  

 

0.37

  

  

 

07/24/23

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

Gerard L. Conway, Jr.

  

 

1,200

  

  

  

 

53.90

  

  

 

01/28/15

  

  

  

  

 

3,000

  

  

  

 

55.80

  

  

 

02/01/16

  

  

  

  

 

3,000

  

  

  

 

37.50

  

  

 

02/14/17

  

  

  

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

  

 

2,700

  

  

  

 

26.00

  

  

 

01/24/18

  

  

  

  

 

250

  

  

  

 

9.50

  

  

 

05/20/19

  

  

  

  

 

27,333

  

  

 

13,667

  

  

 

6.10

  

  

 

04/13/21

  

  

  

  

 

33,333

  

  

 

16,667

  

  

 

2.17

  

  

 

12/13/21

  

  

  

  

  

 

200,000

  

  

 

0.37

  

  

 

07/24/23

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

33,334

  

  

 

51,668

  

Erik J. Hansen

  

 

5,000

  

  

  

 

8.60

  

  

 

10/29/18

  

  

  

  

 

250

  

  

  

 

9.50

  

  

 

05/20/19

  

  

  

  

 

27,333

  

  

 

13,667

  

  

 

6.10

  

  

 

04/13/21

  

  

  

  

 

33,333

  

  

 

16,667

  

  

 

2.17

  

  

 

12/13/21

  

  

  

  

  

 

200,000

  

  

 

0.37

  

  

 

07/24/23

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

116,667

  

  

 

180,834

  

Adrian Corless

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

3,000

  

  

  

 

32.40

  

  

 

02/08/14

  

  

  

  

 

2,700

  

  

  

 

24.20

  

  

 

02/08/14

  

  

  

  

 

250

  

  

  

 

9.50

  

  

 

02/08/14

  

  

  

  

 

27,333

  

  

  

 

6.10

  

  

 

02/08/14

  

  

  

  

 

16,667

  

  

  

 

2.17

  

  

 

02/08/14

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 

—  

  

  

 

—  

  

 

 

(1)

This column represents the number of shares that have not yet vested. 

(2)

This column represents the market value of the unvested restricted stock awards using the stock price at the end of fiscal year 2013.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2013 Table

 

There were no option exercises or stock awards vested during the year for the named executive officers.

 

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

Employment Agreements

The Company and Mr. Marsh are parties to an employment agreement which renews automatically for successive one-year terms unless Mr. Marsh or the Company gives notice to the contrary. Mr. Marsh receives an annual base salary of $450,000 and is eligible to: (i) receive an annual incentive bonus of up to an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of his annual base salary; (ii) participate in all savings and retirement plans; and (iii) participate in all benefit and executive perquisites. Mr. Marsh’s employment may be terminated by the Company for “Cause”, as defined in the agreement, or by Mr. Marsh for “Good Reason”, as defined in the agreement, or without “Good Reason” upon written notice of termination to the Company. If Mr. Marsh’s employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than Cause, death or disability, or in the event that Mr. Marsh terminates his employment with the Company and is able to establish “Good Reason”, the Company is obligated to pay Mr. Marsh the sum of the following amounts:

 

(i)           

any earned but unpaid annual base salary,

 

(ii)          

incentive bonus earned but not yet paid,

 

(iii)         

unpaid expense reimbursements,

 

(iv)         

accrued but unused vacation, plus

 

(v)          

any benefits that may have vested under any employee benefit plan of the Company through the date of termination; plus:

 

 

(a) one (1) times annual base salary and

 

 

(b) one (1) times the annual incentive bonus for the immediately preceding fiscal year.

 

In addition, as of the date of termination, any restricted stock, stock options and other stock awards held by Mr. Marsh will accelerate vesting as if he had remained an employee for an additional twelve (12) months following the date of termination. Further, the Company is required to continue paying for health insurance and other benefits for Mr. Marsh and his eligible family members for twelve (12) months following his termination. The agreement also provides, among other things, that if, within twelve (12) months after a “Change in Control”, as defined in the agreement, the Company terminates Mr. Marsh’s employment without Cause, then he is be entitled to:

       

(i)           

receive a lump sum payment equal to three (3) times the sum of (1) his current annual base salary plus (2) his average annual incentive bonus over the three (3) fiscal years prior to the Change in Control (or his annual incentive bonus for the fiscal year immediately preceding to the Change of Control, if higher),

 

(ii)          

accelerated vesting of his stock options and other stock-based awards that would have vested had he remained an active employee for twelve (12) months following his termination, and

 

(iii)         

receive benefits, including health and life insurance for twelve (12) months following the Change of Control.

 

The Company and Messrs. Conway, Hansen, and Ms. McCoskey are parties to Executive Employment Agreements pursuant to which if any of their employment is terminated by the Company for any reason other than “Cause”, as defined in the agreement, death or disability, or in the event that any terminates his employment with the Company and is able to establish “Good Reason”, as defined in the agreement, the Company is obligated to pay each the sum of the following amounts:

       

(i)           

any earned but unpaid annual base salary,

 

(ii)         

incentive bonus earned but not yet paid,

 

(iii)         

unpaid expense reimbursements,

 

(iv)        

accrued but unused vacation,

 

(v)         

any benefits that may have vested under any employee benefit plan of the Company through the date of termination; plus:

 

one (1) times annual base salary for Messrs. Conway and Hansen, and fifty percent (50%) of then current annual base salary for Ms. McCoskey.

 

 

29

 

In addition, Messrs. Conway and Hansen are entitled to exercise any vested stock options for twelve (12) months following the date of termination and the Company is required to continue paying health insurance and other benefits to each and his eligible family members for twelve (12) months following his termination. Ms. McCoskey is entitled to exercise any vested stock options for six (6) months following the date of termination and the Company is required to continue paying health insurance and other benefits to her and her eligible family members for six (6) months following her termination. The Executive Employment Agreements also provide, among other things, that if, within twelve (12) months after a “Change in Control”, as defined in the agreement, the Company terminates such executive’s employment without Cause, then such executive shall be entitled to:

 

(i)           

receive a lump sum payment (A) for Messrs. Conway and Hansen equal to the sum of (1) his average annual base salary over the three (3) fiscal years immediately prior to the Change of Control (or the executive’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, if higher) and (2) his average annual bonus over the three (3) fiscal years prior to the Change in Control (or the executive’s annual bonus in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, if higher), and (B) for Ms. McCoskey, equal to the sum of (1) fifty percent (50%) of her average annual base salary over the three (3) fiscal years immediately prior to the Change of Control (or the executive’s annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, if higher) and (2) fifty percent (50%) of her average annual bonus over the three (3) fiscal years prior to the Change in Control (or the executive’s annual bonus in effect immediately prior to the Change of Control, if higher)

 

(ii)          

accelerated vesting of his stock options and other stock-based awards that would have vested had he remained an active employee for twelve (12) months following his termination, and

 

(iii)         

receive benefits, including health and life insurance for twelve (12) months following the Change of Control.

 

 

Messrs. Andersen and Corless are also parties to employment agreements that provide for a similar potential payment upon termination of employment other than for “Cause” as discussed above. In 2013, Mr. Andersen and Mr. Corless each left the Company voluntarily and therefore neither was entitled to receive any such payment.

 

 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control

 

The Company and Messrs. Marsh, Conway and Hansen and Ms. McCoskey and are parties to employment agreements, respectively, that provide for a potential payment upon termination of employment other than for “Cause” as discussed above in Employment Agreements.

Such payments by the Company to any of the executives are subject to the executive signing a general release of claims in a form and manner satisfactory to the Company. An executive is not entitled to receive any such payment in the event he breaches the Employee Patent, Confidential Information and Non-Compete Agreement referenced in the executive’s respective agreement or any non-compete, non-solicit or non-disclosure covenants in any agreement between the Company and such executive. We agreed to provide severance payments to such executives in these circumstances based on our negotiations with each of our executives at the time they joined our Company, or as negotiated subsequent to hiring, and in order to provide a total compensation package that we believed to be competitive. Additionally, we believe that providing severance upon a termination without cause can help to encourage our executives to take the risks that we believe are necessary for our Company to succeed and also recognizes the longer hiring process typically involved in hiring a senior executive.

If Mr. Marsh had been terminated without cause on December 31, 2013, the approximate value of the severance package, including, as mentioned above in Employment Agreements, salary, benefits and equity awards, under his employment agreement would have been $767,883. If Ms. McCoskey, Mr. Conway or Mr. Hansen had been terminated without cause on December 31, 2013, the approximate value of the severance packages, including, as mentioned above in Employment Agreements, salary, benefits and equity awards, under the employment agreement for such named executive would have been: Ms. McCoskey—$88,899, Mr. Conway—$314,607 and Mr. Hansen—$411,073.

 

 

 

 

30

 

The Company and Messrs. Marsh, Conway and Hansen and Ms. McCoskey are parties to employment agreements, respectively, that provide for a potential payment upon a “Change of Control”, as discussed above in Employment Agreements. Such payments by the Company to any of the executives are subject to the executive signing a general release of claims in a form and manner satisfactory to the Company. An executive is not entitled to receive any such payment in the event he breaches the Employee Patent, Confidential Information and Non-Compete Agreement referenced in the executive’s respective agreement or any non-compete, non-solicit or non-disclosure covenants in any agreement between the Company and such executive.

We agreed to provide payments to these executives in these circumstances in order to provide a total compensation package that we believed to be competitive. Additionally, the primary purpose of our equity-based incentive awards is to align the interests of our executives and our stockholders and provide our executives with strong incentives to increase stockholder value over time. As change-in-control transactions typically represent events where our stockholders are realizing the value of their equity interests in our Company, we believe it is appropriate for our executives to share in this realization of stockholder value, particularly where their employment is terminated in connection with the change-in-control transaction. We believe that this will also help to better align the interests of our executives with our stockholders in pursuing and engaging in these transactions.

If a change-in-control had occurred on December 31, 2013 and on that date Mr. Marsh, Ms. McCoskey, Mr. Conway or Mr. Hansen, had been terminated without Cause, experienced a material negative change in his or her compensation or responsibilities or was required to be based at a location more than fifty (50) miles from his or her current work location, the value of the change-of-control payments and benefits under the employment agreements for each such named executive would have been as follows: Mr. Marsh—$1,806,921, Ms. McCoskey—$105,171, Mr. Conway—$333,851 and Mr. Hansen—$441,906. The employment agreements provide for a modified cutback of the payments in the event that the total value of all change in control benefits exceed the maximum benefit that allows for a tax deduction for the Company under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

The following Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on Executive Compensation will not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee reviews and evaluates individual executive officers and determines the compensation for each executive officer (See the section entitled “Executive Compensation”). The Compensation Committee also oversees management’s decisions concerning the performance and compensation of other Company officers, administers the Company’s incentive compensation and other stock-based plans, evaluates the effectiveness of its overall compensation programs, including oversight of the Company’s benefit, perquisite and employee equity programs, and reviews the Company’s management succession plans. A more complete description of the Compensation Committee’s functions is set forth in the Compensation Committee’s charter which is published on the “Investors” section of the Company’s website at www.plugpower.com. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an independent director as defined in the NASDAQ Rules.

In general, the Compensation Committee designs compensation to attract, retain and motivate a superior executive team, reward individual performance, relate compensation to Company goals and objectives and align the interests of the executive officers with those of the Company’s stockholders. We rely upon our judgment about each individual—and not on rigid guidelines or formulas, or short-term changes in business performance—in determining the amount and mix of compensation elements for each senior executive officer. Key factors affecting our judgments include: the executive’s performance compared to the goals and objectives established for the executive at the beginning of the year; the nature, scope and level of the executive’s responsibilities; the executive’s contribution to the Company’s financial results; the executive’s effectiveness in leading the Company’s initiatives to increase customer value, productivity and revenue growth; and the executive’s contribution to the Company’s commitment to corporate responsibility, including the executive’s success in creating a culture of unyielding integrity and compliance with applicable law and the Company’s ethics policies.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed that analysis with Management. Based on its review and discussions with Management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and the Company’s proxy statement relating to the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. This report on executive compensation for is provided by the undersigned members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

Gary K. Willis (Chairman)

George C. McNamee

Douglas Hickey

31

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2013, Messrs. Willis (Chairman), McNamee and Hickey served as members of the Compensation Committee. None of them had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

 

 

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE COMPANY’S 2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Summary of the Amendment and Restatement of the 2011 Plan

 

The stockholders are being asked to approve an amended and restatement of the 2011 Plan to, among other things, increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the 2011 Plan from 6,500,000 shares to 17,000,000 shares, an increase of 11,500,000 shares.  On April 22, 2014,  upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors approved an amendment and restatement of the 2011 Plan, subject to approval from our stockholders at the annual meeting. Our named executive officers and directors have an interest in this proposal, as each of them is eligible to receive grants under the 2011 Plan.

Stockholder approval of the 2011 Plan, as amended and restated, will also serve as a re-approval of the performance measures set for in the 2011 Plan, as further described below under the section entitled “Qualified Performance-Based Compensation under Code Section 162(m).”

As of April 16, 2014, 965,755 shares of Common Stock were available for issuance under the 2011 Plan. We currently expect that these shares, together with shares which become available due to the cancellation of outstanding awards, will be insufficient for awards to new hires, directors and existing employees.

As of April 16, 2014, there were stock options to acquire 4,775,485 shares of common stock outstanding under the Company’s equity compensation plans with a weighted average exercise price of $3.04 and weighted average remaining term of 8.5 years. In addition, as of April 16, 2014, there were 3,343,333 unvested full-value awards outstanding under the Company’s equity compensation plans. Other than the foregoing, no other awards under the Company’s equity compensation plans were outstanding as of April 16, 2014.  

We believe strongly that the increase of shares issuable under the 2011 Plan is essential to our continued success. Our employees are our most valuable assets. At our current and projected growth rate, we anticipate that we will grant shares to support new employee growth, employee retention efforts, director compensation and other stock‑based incentive programs. Our Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to increase the shares issuable under the 2011 Plan. The Board believes that stock options and other stock‑based incentive awards can play an important role in the success of the Company by encouraging and enabling the employees, officers, non-employee directors and other key persons of the Company and its subsidiaries upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depends for the successful conduct of its business to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company. The Board anticipates that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company will assure a closer identification of the interests of such individuals with those of the Company and its stockholders, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.

  Vote Required for Approval

 

A quorum being present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock (treating the Preferred Stock on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve the Amendment and Restatement of the 2011 Plan.  For purposes of determining whether this proposal has passed, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the number of votes cast for or against the proposal and therefore have no effect on the vote on the proposal.

 

 

 

32

 

 

Recommendation of the Board

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”

THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE PLUG POWER INC. 2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 

Summary of the 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

The Board of Directors believes that stock options and other stock-based incentive awards can play an important role in the success of the Company by encouraging and enabling the current employees, consultants, officers and non-employee directors and prospective employees of the Company and its subsidiaries upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depends for the successful conduct of its business to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company.  The Board of Directors anticipates that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company will assure a closer identification of the interests of participants in the plan with those of the Company and its stockholders, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.

 

The following description of certain features of the Amended and Restated 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan) is intended to be a summary only. The summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan, as set forth in Appendix A, attached hereto.

The material features of the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan are:

 

33

 

 

Based solely on the closing price of our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ on April 16, 2014 and the maximum number of shares that would have been available for awards as of such date taking into account the proposed increase described herein, the maximum aggregate market value of the common stock that could potentially be issued under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan is $88,257,545.40.  The shares we issue under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan will be authorized but unissued shares or shares that we reacquire.  The shares of common stock underlying any awards that are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by the Company prior to vesting, satisfied without any issuance of stock, expire or are otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan are added back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.

Qualified Performance-Based Compensation under Code Section 162(m)

To ensure that certain awards granted under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan to a “Covered Employee” (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”)) qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan provides that the Compensation Committee may require that the vesting of such awards be conditioned on the satisfaction of performance criteria that may include any or all of the following:  (1) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (2) net income (loss) (either before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization); (3) changes in the market price of the stock; (4) economic value-added; (5) achievement of sales or revenue; (6) acquisitions or strategic transactions; (7) product development or quality; (8) operating income (loss); (9) cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow); (10) return on capital, assets, equity, or investment; (11) total stockholder returns; (12) return on sales; (13) gross or net profit levels; (14) productivity; (15) expenses; (16) margins; (17) operating efficiency; (18) capital raising transactions; (19) debt transactions; (20) working capital; (21) earnings (loss) per share of common stock; (22) sales or market shares; and (23) number of customers, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results of a peer group.  The Compensation Committee will select the particular performance criteria within 90 days following the commencement of a performance cycle.  Subject to adjustments for stock splits and similar events, the maximum award granted to any one individual that is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code will not exceed 2,500,000 shares of common stock for any performance cycle and options or stock appreciation rights with respect to no more than 5,000,000 shares of common stock may be granted to any one individual during any calendar year period.  If a performance-based award is payable in cash, it cannot exceed $7,500,000 for any performance cycle.

 Administration.  The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors will administer the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan. The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing all of our executive compensation plans. 

Eligibility.  All of our employees, consultants and non-employee directors will be eligible to be granted awards under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan. An employee, consultant or non-employee director granted an award will be a participant under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.  

Number of Shares Available for Issuance. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that are authorized for issuance under the 2011 Plan is 6,500,000. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that will be authorized for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan will be 17,000,000. Shares issued under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan may be treasury shares or authorized but unissued shares.  In the event the number of shares to be delivered upon the exercise or payment of any award granted under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan is reduced for any reason or in the event that any award (or portion thereof) can no longer be exercised or paid, the number of shares no longer subject to such award shall be released from such award and shall thereafter be available under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan for the grant of additional awards.  Upon the occurrence of a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares or the like, the plan administrator may ratably adjust the aggregate number and affected class of securities available under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.

Types of Awards. The plan administrator may grant the following types of awards under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan: stock options; restricted stock; or other stock-based awards. Stock options awarded under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan may be nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. With the exception of incentive stock options, the plan administrator may grant, from time to time, any of the types of awards under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan to our employees, consultants and non-employee directors. Incentive stock options may only be granted to our employees. 

Effect of Awards.  For purposes of determining the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan, the grant of any “full value” award, such as a restricted stock award, restricted stock unit, unrestricted stock award or performance share will be counted as 1.5  shares for each share of common stock actually subject to the award.  The grant of any stock option or stock appreciation right will be counted for this purpose as one share from each share of common stock actually subject to the award.

 

 

34

 

        Stock Options. A stock option is the right to acquire shares of our common stock at a fixed price for a fixed period of time and generally is subject to a vesting requirement. To date, as a matter of practice, options have generally been subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of the total award vesting at the first anniversary of the grant date and the remainder vesting in equal thirds each anniversary thereafter.  A stock option will be in the form of a nonqualified stock option or an incentive stock option. The exercise price is set as the market price on the grant date.  The option exercise price may not be reduced after the date of grant, other than to appropriately reflect change in our capital structure.  The term of a stock option may not exceed ten years or five years in the case of incentive stock options granted to a 10% owner.  After termination of an optionee, he or she may exercise his or her vested options for the period of time stated in the stock option agreement.  If termination is for cause, vested options may no longer be exercised.  In all other cases, the vested options will remain exercisable for executives twelve (12) months.  However, an option may not be exercised later than its expiration date.

 

Stock Appreciation Rights.  The Compensation Committee may award stock appreciation rights subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Compensation Committee may determine.  Stock appreciation rights entitle the recipient to shares of common stock equal to the value of the appreciation in the stock price over the exercise price.  The exercise price is the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.  The maximum term of a stock appreciation right is ten years.

Restricted Stock.  A restricted stock award is an award entitling the recipient to acquire, at par value or such other higher purchase price determined by the administrator, shares of stock subject to such restrictions and conditions as the administrator may determine at the time of grant.  Conditions may be based on continuing employment (or other business relationship) and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives.  The grant of a restricted stock award is contingent on the participant executing the restricted stock award agreement.  Restricted stock awards are shares of our common stock that are subject to cancellation, restrictions and vesting conditions, as determined by the plan administrator.  Restricted stock awards generally vest over three years, beginning with one-third vesting one year after the date of grant, then pro-rata vesting monthly thereafter. Restricted stock awards are made pursuant to the 2011 Plan.  

Restricted Stock Units.  The Compensation Committee may award restricted stock units to any participants.  Restricted stock units are ultimately payable in the form of shares of common stock and may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Compensation Committee may determine.  These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance goals (as summarized above) and/or continued employment with the Company through a specified vesting period.  However, except in the case of retirement, death, disability or a change of control, in the event these awards granted to employees have a performance-based goal, the restriction period will be at least one year, and in the event these awards granted to employees have a time-based restriction, the restriction period will be at least three years, but vesting can occur incrementally over the three-year period.  In the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion, it may permit a participant to make an advance election to receive a portion of his or her future cash compensation otherwise due in the form of a deferred stock unit award, subject to the participant’s compliance with the procedures established by the Compensation Committee and requirements of Section 409A of the Code. 

Unrestricted Stock Awards.  The Compensation Committee may also grant shares of common stock which are free from any restrictions under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.  Unrestricted stock may be granted to any participant in recognition of past services or other valid consideration and may be issued in lieu of cash compensation due to such participant.

Performance Share Awards.  The Compensation Committee may grant performance share awards to any participant which entitle the recipient to receive shares of common stock upon the achievement of certain performance goals (as summarized above) and such other conditions as the Compensation Committee shall determine.  These awards granted to employees will have a performance period of at least one year.

Cash-Based Awards.  The Compensation Committee may grant cash bonuses under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan to participants.  The cash bonuses may be subject to the achievement of certain performance goals (as summarized above).

Change of Control Provisions.  The Amended and Restated 2011 Plan provides that upon the effectiveness of a “sale event” as defined in the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan, except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee in the award agreement, all stock options and stock appreciation rights  shall become fully exercisable and the restrictions and conditions on all such other awards with time-based conditions will automatically be deemed waived. Awards with conditions and restrictions relating to the attainment of performance goals may become vested and non-forfeitable in connection with a sale event in the Compensation Committee’s discretion.  In addition, in the case of a sale event in which the Company’s stockholders will receive cash consideration, the Company may make or provide for a cash payment to participants holding options and stock appreciation rights equal to the difference between the per share cash consideration and the exercise price of the options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for the cancellation thereto.

 

 

35

 

Adjustments for Stock Dividends, Stock Splits, Etc.  The Amended and Restated 2011 Plan requires the Compensation Committee to make appropriate adjustments to the number of shares of common stock that are subject to the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan, to certain limits in the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan, and to any outstanding awards to reflect stock dividends, stock splits, extraordinary cash dividends and similar events. 

Tax Withholding.  Participants in the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan are responsible for the payment of any federal, state or local taxes that the Company is required by law to withhold upon the exercise of options or stock appreciation rights or vesting of other awards.  Subject to approval by the Compensation Committee, participants may elect to have the minimum tax withholding obligations satisfied by authorizing the Company to withhold shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to the exercise or vesting of such award.

Amendments and Termination.  The Board may at any time amend or discontinue the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan and the Compensation Committee may at any time amend or cancel any outstanding award for the purpose of satisfying changes in the law or for any other lawful purpose.  However, no such action may adversely affect any rights under any outstanding award without the holder’s consent.  To the extent required under the rules of the NASDAQ, any amendments that materially change the terms of the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan will be subject to approval by our stockholders.  Amendments shall also be subject to approval by our stockholders if and to the extent determined by the Compensation Committee to be required by the Code to preserve the qualified status of incentive options or to ensure that compensation earned under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan qualifies as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Effective Date of Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.  The Board adopted the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan on April 22, 2014. Awards of incentive options may be granted under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan until April 21, 2024.  No other awards may be granted under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan after the date that is 10 years from the date of stockholder approval or July 22, 2024.   

Because the grant of awards under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan is within the discretion of the Compensation Committee, we cannot determine the dollar value or number of shares of common stock that will in the future be received by or allocated to any participant in the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.   

Tax Aspects Under the Code

The following is a summary of the principal federal income tax consequences of certain transactions under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan.  It does not describe all federal tax consequences under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan, nor does it describe state or local tax consequences.

Incentive Options.  No taxable income is generally realized by the optionee upon the grant or exercise of an incentive option.  If shares of common stock issued to an optionee pursuant to the exercise of an incentive option are sold or transferred after two years from the date of grant and after one year from the date of exercise, then (i) upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the option price (the amount paid for the shares) will be taxed to the optionee as a long-term capital gain, and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and (ii) the Company will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes.  The exercise of an incentive option will give rise to an item of tax preference that may result in alternative minimum tax liability for the optionee.

If shares of common stock acquired upon the exercise of an incentive option are disposed of prior to the expiration of the two-year and one-year holding periods described above (a “disqualifying disposition”), generally (i) the optionee will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of the shares of common stock at exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on a sale of such shares of common stock) over the option price thereof, and (ii) we will be entitled to deduct such amount.  Special rules apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the incentive option is paid by tendering shares of common stock.

If an incentive option is exercised at a time when it no longer qualifies for the tax treatment described above, the option is treated as a non-qualified option.  Generally, an incentive option will not be eligible for the tax treatment described above if it is exercised more than three months following termination of employment (or one year in the case of termination of employment by reason of disability).  In the case of termination of employment by reason of death, the three-month rule does not apply.

 

 

36

 

 

Non-Qualified Options.  No income is realized by the optionee at the time the option is granted.  Generally (i) at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the optionee in an amount equal to the difference between the option price and the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of exercise, and we receive a tax deduction for the same amount, and (ii) at disposition, appreciation or depreciation after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain or loss depending on how long the shares of common stock have been held.  Special rules apply where all or a portion of the exercise price of the non-qualified option is paid by tendering shares of common stock.  Upon exercise, the optionee will also be subject to Social Security taxes on the excess of the fair market value over the exercise price of the option.

Other Awards.  The Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by the participant at the time the participant recognizes such income.  Participants typically are subject to income tax and recognize such tax at the time that an award is exercised, vests or becomes non-forfeitable, unless the award provides for a further deferral.

Parachute Payments.  The vesting of any portion of an option or other award that is accelerated due to the occurrence of a change in control (such as a sale event) may cause a portion of the payments with respect to such accelerated awards to be treated as “parachute payments” as defined in the Code.  Any such parachute payments may be non-deductible to the Company, in whole or in part, and may subject the recipient to a non-deductible 20 percent federal excise tax on all or a portion of such payment (in addition to other taxes ordinarily payable). 

Limitation on Deductions.  Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company’s deduction for certain awards under the Amended and Restated 2011 Plan may be limited to the extent that the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer whose compensation is required to be reported in the summary compensation table (other than the Principal Financial Officer) receives compensation in excess of $1 million a year (other than performance-based compensation that otherwise meets the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code).  The Amended and Restated 2011 Plan is structured to allow certain awards to qualify as performance-based compensation.

 

 

37

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2013 regarding the shares of Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, restricted stock and common stock warrants under the Company’s 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights

Weighted Average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under equity
compensation plan (excluding securities
referenced in
column (a))
       

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

 

 

5,353,328(1)

 

 

2.83

 

 

1,148,924 (2)

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

 

 

400,000 (3)

 

 

0.57

 

 

--

 

 

 

 

 

Total

5,753,328

2.68

1,148,924

 

 

(1)

Represents 725,051 outstanding options issued under the 1999 Plan, 3,978,275 outstanding options issued under the 2011 Plan, and 650,002 shares of restricted stock issued under the 2011 Plan.
     

 

(2)

Includes shares available for future issuance under the 2011 Plan.
     

 

(3)

Included in “equity compensation plans not approved by security holders” are shares granted to new employees for key positions within the company.  As such, no specific shares have been allocated for this purpose, but rather shares are approved by the company’s Board of Directors on an applicant by applicant basis.  To date, we have 400,000 options outstanding in this category.

 

Recommendation of the Board

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”

THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 

 

38

 

PROPOSAL 3:  APPROVAL OF THE THIRD CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

 

 

Summary

 

The Board of Directors has adopted a resolutions approving and recommending that the stockholders approve an amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 245,000,000 shares to 450,000,000 shares.  The authorized capital stock of the Company currently consists of 245,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.  If the proposed amendment is approved, the authorized capital stock of the Company will consist of 450,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.  The form of the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement.

 

The purpose of the proposed amendment is to provide additional authorized shares of Common Stock for possible use in connection with future financings, investment opportunities, acquisitions, employee benefit plans or for other corporate purposes. The Company has no commitments at this time for the issuance of the additional authorized Common Stock but desires to position itself to do so when needs arise and market conditions warrant.

 

If the proposed amendment is approved by the stockholders, 450,000,000 shares of Common Stock will be authorized for issuance and the additional authorized Common Stock may be issued by the Company without any further action by the stockholders. The issuance of additional authorized shares, may, among other things, have a dilutive effect on earnings per share and on the equity and voting power of existing holders of Common Stock.  In addition, such issuance may also be deemed to have an antitakeover effect by making it more difficult to obtain stockholder approval of various actions, such as a merger or removal of management. Although the Board of Directors has no present intention of issuing additional shares for such purposes, the proposed increase in the number of authorized shares could also enable the Board of Directors to render more difficult or discourage an attempt by another person or entity to obtain control of the Company.

 

Vote Required for Approval

 

A quorum being present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock (treating the Preferred Stock on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) is required for the approval of the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.  For purposes of determining whether this proposal has passed, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as having been voted for the proposal and therefore will have the same effect as negative votes

 

 

 

Recommendation of the Board

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE THIRD CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

PROPOSAL 4:  ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Overview

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing the Company’s stockholders the opportunity to vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, which is described in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement. Accordingly, the following resolution will be submitted for a stockholder vote at the 2014 Annual Meeting:

 

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Plug Power Inc. (the “Company”) approve, on an advisory basis, the overall compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, compensation tables and narrative discussion set forth in the Proxy Statement for this Annual Meeting.”

 

As described in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation program is designed to (1) attract and retain talented and experienced executives, (2) motivate and reward executives whose knowledge, skills and performance are critical to our success, (3) provide a competitive compensation package which is weighted towards pay-for-performance and in which total compensation is primarily determined by Company and individual results and the creation of shareholder value, (4) ensure fairness among the executive management team by recognizing the contributions each executive makes to our success, and (5) motivate our executives to manage our business to meet our short- and long-term objectives and reward them for meeting these objectives. In order to align executive compensation with the interests of our stockholders, an important portion of compensation for our Named Executive Officers is “at risk,” or contingent upon the successful achievement of annual as well as long-term strategic corporate goals that we believe will drive stockholder value. Stockholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, which more thoroughly discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy and objectives. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that these policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its objectives.

 

This vote is only advisory and will not be binding upon the Company or the Board. However, the Board values constructive dialogue on executive compensation and other important governance topics with the Company’s stockholders and encourages all stockholders to vote their shares on this matter.

 

Vote Required for Approval

 

A quorum being present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock (treating the Preferred Stock on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required to approve this resolution. Even though this vote will neither be binding on the Company or the Board nor will it create or imply any change in the fiduciary duties of, or impose any additional fiduciary duty on, the Company or the Board, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. For purposes of determining whether this proposal has passed, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the number of votes cast for or against the proposal and therefore have no effect on the vote on the proposal.

 

 

  

Recommendation of the Board

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE OVERALL COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THIS RESOLUTION.

 

 

 

 

40

 

PROPOSAL 5:  RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

Introduction

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed the firm of KPMG, independent auditors, to serve as independent auditors for its 2014 fiscal year. KPMG has served as the Company’s independent auditing firm since December 3, 2001. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed its selection of, and the performance of, KPMG for its 2014 fiscal year. As a matter of good corporate governance, the Audit Committee has determined to submit its selection to stockholders for ratification. If the selection of auditors is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent auditing firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has implemented procedures under the Company’s Audit Committee pre-approval policy for audit and non-audit services (the “Pre-Approval Policy”) to ensure that all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided to the Company have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Specifically, the Audit Committee pre-approves the use of KPMG for specific audit and non-audit services, within approved monetary limits. If a proposed service has not been pre-approved pursuant to the Pre-Approval Policy, then it must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee before it may be provided by KPMG. Any pre-approved services exceeding the pre-approved monetary limits require specific approval by the Audit Committee. For additional information concerning the Audit Committee and its activities with KPMG, see “Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors” and “Audit Committee Report” above.

        

Representatives of KPMG attended all five meetings of the Audit Committee in-person in 2013. We expect that a representative of KPMG will attend the Annual Meeting, and the representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires. The representative will also be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

 

 Vote Required for Approval

                A quorum being present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock (treating the Preferred Stock on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of KPMG as the Company’s independent auditors for 2014.  For purposes of determining whether this proposal has passed, abstentions and broker non-votes are not included in the number of votes cast for or against the proposal and therefore have no effect on the vote on the proposal.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF KPMG LLP AS PLUG POWER INC.’S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2014.

 

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a related party transaction policy that requires the Company’s General Counsel, together with outside counsel as necessary, to evaluate potential transaction between the Company and any related party prior to entering into any such transaction. Certain related party transactions may require the approval of the Board of Directors and its Audit Committee. The policy defines a “related party” as: (i) the Company’s directors or executive officers, (ii) the Company’s director nominees, (iii) security holders known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, or (iv) the immediate family members of any of the persons listed in items (i) – (iii). A person’s “immediate family” includes such person’s child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law or any other person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such person.

 

Other than as otherwise disclosed herein, since January 1, 2013, the Company has not entered into, and there is not currently proposed, any transactions or series of similar transactions involving an amount in excess of $120,000 in which any related party had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

The Company and Axane, S.A. (“Axane”) , a subsidiary of Air Liquide S.A. (“Air Liquide”), are partners in Hypulsion S.A.S. (the “JV”), a joint venture to develop and sell hydrogen fuel cell systems for the European material handling market. The Company currently owns 20% and Axane owns 80% of the JV. Air Liquide is also the parent company of Air Liquide Investissements d’Avenir et de Démonstration (“Air Liquide Investment”). Air Liquide Investment beneficially owns approximately 7.2% of our common stock.

In connection with the formation of the JV in February 2012, the Company and Axane entered into a Master and Shareholders’ Agreement providing for the terms of the JV, and the Company and the JV entered into a License Agreement (the “License Agreement”).

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

Under the License Agreement, the Company granted to the JV a royalty-free license to certain intellectual property in the field of integrated hydrogen fuel cell systems for the material handling market (the “License”). The License is exclusive as to the territories of Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg, Republic of Macedonia, Malta, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom (the “Territory”). If the Company sells its entire equity interest in the JV, the License becomes non-exclusive one year after such sale. Further, the License becomes non-exclusive, and the Company may terminate the License, upon any bankruptcy or dissolution of the JV. Under the License Agreement, the Company receives a royalty-free license back to certain intellectual property of the JV in the field of integrated hydrogen fuel cell systems for the material handling market outside of the Territory. The term of the License runs until the expiration of the last item of licensed intellectual property or ninety-nine years, whichever is longer. The License terminates in the event that Axane fails to make any required contribution to the JV.

On May 8, 2013, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Air Liquide Investment, pursuant to which the Company sold to Air Liquide Investment 10,431 shares of the Company’s Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.6 million (Euro 2 million) in cash.

Under the terms of the investment, for so long as Air Liquide Investment holds any shares of Series C Preferred Stock, Air Liquide Investment is entitled to designate one director to the Company’s Board of Directors. In the event the Series C Preferred Stock is converted into shares of Common Stock and Air Liquide Investment continues to hold at least 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock or 50% of the shares of Common Stock held by Air Liquide Investment on an as-converted basis immediately following the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, Air Liquide Investment will continue to be entitled to designate one director to the Company’s Board of Directors. Air Liquide Investment also has the right to participate in certain private equity financings by the Company.

In connection with the Series C Preferred Stock investment, Axane purchased from the Company a 25% ownership interest in the JV for a cash purchase price of $3.3 million (Euro 2.5 million). The Company currently owns 20% and Axane owns 80% of the JV. The Company has the right to purchase a 60% ownership interest in the JV from Axane in 2018 at a formula price. If the Company does not exercise its purchase right, Axane has the right to buy the Company’s remaining 20% interest at a formula price.

In connection with the Series C Preferred Stock investment, the Company and the JV entered into an engineering service agreement under which, among other things, the Company provides the JV with engineering and technical services. During 2013, the JV made payments to the Company totaling $3,009,923 for engineering, technical, consulting and related services. In addition, during 2013, the JV paid the Company a total of $494,492 for the purchase of fuel cell systems and parts.

 

 

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of March 31, 2014 (except as otherwise indicated) by:

 

1 For purposes of this policy, a person's immediate family should include such person’s child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law or any other person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of such person.

 

 

 

42

 

 

The beneficial ownership of the stockholders listed below is based on publicly available information and from representations of such stockholders.

  

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)

  

Shares Beneficially Owned (2)

 

  

Number

 

  

Percentage (%)

 

Air Liquide S.A. (3)

  

 

11,105,204

  

  

 

6.6

% 

Heights Capital Management (4)

  

 

10,000,000

  

  

 

6.0

% 

George C. McNamee (5)

  

 

845,155

  

  

 

*

  

Andrew Marsh (6)

  

 

628,061

  

  

 

*

  

Gary K. Willis (7)

  

 

316,175

  

  

 

*

  

Larry G. Garberding (8)

  

 

270,311

  

  

 

*

  

Maureen O. Helmer (9)

  

 

248,681

  

  

 

*

  

Erik J. Hansen (10)

  

 

141,821

  

  

 

*

  

Gerard L. Conway, Jr. (11)

  

 

123,143

  

  

 

*

  

Johannes Minoh Roth (12)

  

 

100,146

  

  

 

*

  

Douglas Hickey (1)

  

 

91,000

  

  

 

*

  

Evgeny Miroshnichenko (14)

  

 

61,195

  

  

 

*

  

Jill McCoskey (15)

  

 

34,104

  

  

 

*

  

Gerald A. Anderson

  

 

20,982

  

  

 

*

  

Adrian Corless

  

 

10,372

  

  

 

*

  

Xavier Pontone

  

 

2,296

  

  

 

*

  

Gregory Kenausis

  

 

2,296

  

  

 

*

  

Keith Schmid

  

 

2,103

  

  

 

*

  

David Waldek

  

 

180

  

  

 

*

  

All executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons) (16)

  

 

2,898,021

  

  

 

1.

7% 

 

*

Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock

 

1)

Unless otherwise indicated by footnote, the mailing address for each stockholder is c/o Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Latham, New York 12110.

 

2)

The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under rules promulgated by the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Under Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, beneficial ownership includes any shares to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of May 22, 2014, through the exercise of any warrant, stock option or other right. The inclusion in this table of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such shares. The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding used in calculating the percentage for each listed person includes the shares of Common Stock underlying options, warrants or other rights held by such person that are exercisable within 60 days of May 22, 2014 but excludes shares of Common Stock underlying options, warrants or other rights held by any other person. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 167,125,648 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of May 22, 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the stockholder.

 

 

 

43

 

 

3)

Includes 39,324 shares of Common Stock and 11,965,880 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of the Company’s Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock. All shares are held directly by Air Liquide Investissements d’Avenir et de Démonstration, a corporation incorporated under the laws of France having its registered office at 6, rue Cognacq-Jay 75007 Paris, France and its principal office at 104, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine 75012 Paris, France. Air Liquide Investissements d’Avenir et de Démonstration is a wholly owned subsidiary of Air Liquide S.A., a corporation incorporated under the laws of France, having its principal office at 75, Quai d’Orsay, 75321 Paris, France. Information is partly based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on March 19, 2014.

 

4)

Heights Capital Management, Inc. is the investment manager to Capital Ventures International and as such may exercise voting and dispositive power over these shares. Information is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 10, 2014. The address of the principal business office of Capital Ventures International is P.O. Box 897, Regatta Office Park, West Bay Road, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, British West Indies. The address of the principal business office of Heights Capital Management, Inc. is 101 California Street, Suite 3250, San Francisco, California 94111.

 

5)

Includes 132,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and 96,774 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants.

 

6)

Includes 280,183 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and 48,387 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants.

 

7)

Includes 111,100 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

8)

Includes 119,500 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

9)

Includes 106,700 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

10)

Includes 79,583 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

11)

Includes 84,483 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

12)

Includes 75,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

13)

Includes 91,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

 

14)

Includes 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

15)

Includes 29,433 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.

 

16)

Includes 1,118,982 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and 145,161 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants.

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s officers, as defined by Section 16, and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock (collectively, “Section 16 Persons”), to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Section 16 Persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Form 4s were filed late on April 3, 2013 for each of Messrs. McNamee, Garberding, Hickey, Willis and Miroshnichenko and Ms. Helmer for stock grants made pursuant to the Company’s Director Compensation Policy and in accordance with the Company’s 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

EXPENSES OF SOLICITATION

The Company will pay the entire expense of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. The Company has retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to consult in the solicitation for a fee of approximately $40,000.   In addition to solicitations by mail, certain directors, officers and regular employees of the Company (who will receive no compensation for their services other than their regular compensation) may solicit proxies personally, by telephone, by e-mail or by other form of electronic communication. Banks, brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries have been requested to forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by them and such custodians will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses by the Company.

44

 

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Any stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 and intended to be presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company on or before February __, 2015 to be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy to be distributed by the Board of Directors in connection with that meeting. Any such proposal should be mailed to: Corporate Secretary, Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, New York 12110. Such proposal must also comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC for such a proposal to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy.

Any stockholder proposals (including recommendations of nominees for election to the Board of Directors) intended to be presented at the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, other than a stockholder proposal submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, must be received in writing at the principal executive office of the Company not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to July 23, 2015 which dates are April 24, 2015 and March 25, 2015 respectively. If the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting is subsequently moved more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after July 23, 2015 such proposals must be received not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the scheduled date of the 2015 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which publish announcement of the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting is first made, as set forth in the Company’s By-laws. Stockholder proposals must include all supporting documentation required by the Company’s By-laws. Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will confer discretionary voting authority with respect to these proposals, subject to SEC rules governing the exercise of this authority. 

 

 

 

DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL REPORT

Electronic Delivery

 

The notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and 2013 Annual Report is available at www.proxyvote.com.  Stockholders can elect to receive paper copies of the Annual Report and Proxy Statement in the mail by visiting at www.plugpower.com, by writing to Investor Relations at Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Latham, NY 12110 or by contacting the Company at (518) 782-7700.

Many brokerage firms and banks are also offering electronic proxy materials to their clients. If you are a beneficial owner of Plug Power stock, you may contact that broker or bank to find out whether this service is available to you. If your broker or bank uses Broadridge Investor Communications, you can sign up to receive electronic proxy materials at www.proxyvote.com.

“Householding” is the term used to describe the practice of delivering one copy of a document to a household of shareholders instead of delivering one copy of a document to each shareholder in the household. Stockholders who share a common address and who have not opted out of the householding process should receive a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for each account. If you received more than one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you may elect to household in the future; if you received a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you may opt out of householding in the future, in either case, by writing to the Company at the following address, Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, New York 12110, or by calling the Company at (518) 782-7700.

 In any event, you may obtain a copy of this Proxy Statement by writing to the Company at the following address: Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, New York 12110.

 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

The Company’s 2013 Annual Report was furnished to stockholders with this Proxy Statement. Upon request, the Company will furnish without charge a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has been filed with the SEC. Stockholders may receive a copy of the Form 10-K by:
 

(1)     

Writing to Investor Relations at Plug Power Inc., 968 Albany Shaker Road, Latham, NY 12110;

(2)     

Calling (518) 782-7700;

(3)     

Accessing the Company’s website at www.plugpower.com; or

(4)     

Accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

45

 

 

APPENDIX A

 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 

 

PLUG POWER INC.

2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN
AS AMENDED AND RESTATED

GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE PLAN; DEFINITIONS

The name of the plan is the Plug Power Inc. 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”).  The purpose of the Plan is to encourage and enable the officers, employees, Non-Employee Directors and other key persons (including consultants and prospective employees) of Plug Power Inc. (the “Company”) and its Subsidiaries upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depends for the successful conduct of its business to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company.  It is anticipated that providing such persons with a direct stake in the Company’s welfare will assure a closer identification of their interests with those of the Company and its stockholders, thereby stimulating their efforts on the Company’s behalf and strengthening their desire to remain with the Company.

The following terms shall be defined as set forth below:

“Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

“Administrator” means either the Board or the compensation committee of the Board or a similar committee performing the functions of the compensation committee and which is comprised of not less than two Non‑Employee Directors who are independent.

“Award” or “Awards,” except where referring to a particular category of grant under the Plan, shall include Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Deferred Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Awards, Unrestricted Stock Awards, Cash-Based Awards and Performance Share Awards.

“Award Agreement” means a written or electronic agreement setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award granted under the Plan.  Each Award Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

“Cash-Based Award” means an Award entitling the recipient to receive a cash-denominated payment.

“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any successor Code, and related rules, regulations and interpretations.

“Covered Employee” means an employee who is a “Covered Employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

“Deferred Stock Award” means an Award of phantom stock units to a grantee.

“Effective Date” means the date on which the amended and restated Plan is approved by stockholders as set forth in Section 20.

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

 

 

46

 

 

“Fair Market Value” of the Stock on any given date means the fair market value of the Stock determined in good faith by the Administrator; provided, however, that if the Stock is admitted to quotation on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”), NASDAQ Capital Market or another national securities exchange, the “Fair Market Value” of the Stock shall be the closing price of the Stock on such exchange on such date.  If there are no market quotations for such date, the determination shall be made by reference to the last date preceding such date for which there are market quotations.

“Incentive Stock Option” means any Stock Option designated and qualified as an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Code.

“Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not also an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.

“Non-Qualified Stock Option” means any Stock Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

“Option” or “Stock Option” means any option to purchase shares of Stock granted pursuant to Section 5.

“Performance-Based Award” means any Restricted Stock Award, Deferred Stock Award, Performance Share Award or Cash-Based Award granted to a Covered Employee that is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

“Performance Criteria” means the criteria that the Administrator selects for purposes of establishing the Performance Goal or Performance Goals for an individual for a Performance Cycle.  The Performance Criteria (which shall be applicable to the organizational level specified by the Administrator, including, but not limited to, the Company or a unit, division, group, or Subsidiary of the Company) that will be used to establish Performance Goals are limited to the following: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, net income (loss) (either before or after interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization), changes in the market price of the Stock, economic value-added, sales or revenue, acquisitions or strategic transactions, achievement of project development milestones, operating income (loss), cash flow (including, but not limited to, operating cash flow and free cash flow), return on capital, assets, equity, or investment, total stockholder returns, return on sales, gross or net profit levels, productivity, expense, margins, operating efficiency, capital raising transactions, debt transactions, working capital, earnings (loss) per share of Stock, sales or market shares and number of customers, any of which may be measured either in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or as compared to results of a peer group.

“Performance Cycle” means a calendar year period over which the attainment of one or more Performance Criteria will be measured for the purpose of determining a grantee’s right to and the payment of a Restricted Stock Award, Deferred Stock Award, Performance Share Award or Cash-Based Award.

“Performance Goals” means, for a Performance Cycle, the specific goals established in writing by the Administrator for a Performance Cycle based upon the Performance Criteria. 

“Performance Share Award” means an Award entitling the recipient to acquire shares of Stock upon the attainment of specified Performance Goals.

“Restricted Stock Award” means an Award entitling the recipient to acquire, at such purchase price (which may be zero) as determined by the Administrator, shares of Stock subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Administrator may determine at the time of grant.

“Sale Event” shall mean (i) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company on a consolidated basis to an unrelated person or entity, (ii) a merger, reorganization or consolidation in which the outstanding shares of Stock are converted into or exchanged for securities of the successor entity and the holders of the Company’s outstanding voting power immediately prior to such transaction do not own a majority of the outstanding voting power of the successor entity immediately upon completion of such transaction, or (iii) the sale of all of the Stock of the Company to an unrelated person or entity.

“Sale Price” means the value as determined by the Administrator of the consideration payable, or otherwise to be received by stockholders, per share of Stock pursuant to a Sale Event.

“Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated thereunder.

“Stock” means the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company, subject to adjustments pursuant to Section 3.

47

 

 

“Stock Appreciation Right” means an Award entitling the recipient to receive shares of Stock having a value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of the Stock Appreciation Right multiplied by the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the Stock Appreciation Right shall have been exercised.

“Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity (other than the Company) in which the Company has at least a 50 percent interest, either directly or indirectly.

“Ten Percent Owner” means an employee who owns or is deemed to own (by reason of the attribution rules of Section 424(d) of the Code) more than 10 percent of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any parent or subsidiary corporation.

“Unrestricted Stock Award” means an Award of shares of Stock free of any restrictions.

ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN; ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORITY TO SELECT GRANTEES AND DETERMINE AWARDS

Administration of Plan.  The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator.

Powers of Administrator.  The Administrator shall have the power and authority to grant Awards consistent with the terms of the Plan, including the power and authority:

to select the individuals to whom Awards may from time to time be granted;

to determine the time or times of grant, and the extent, if any, of Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Deferred Stock Awards, Unrestricted Stock Awards, Cash-Based Awards and Performance Share Awards, or any combination of the foregoing, granted to any one or more grantees;

to determine the number of shares of Stock to be covered by any Award;

to determine and modify from time to time the terms and conditions, including restrictions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award, which terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and grantees, and to approve the form of written instruments evidencing the Awards;

to accelerate at any time the exercisability or vesting of all or any portion of any Award, including but not limited to termination of employment or a Sale Event;

subject to the provisions of Section 5(c), to extend at any time the period in which Stock Options may be exercised; and

at any time to adopt, alter and repeal such rules, guidelines and practices for administration of the Plan and for its own acts and proceedings as it shall deem advisable; to interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any Award (including related written instruments); to make all determinations it deems advisable for the administration of the Plan; to decide all disputes arising in connection with the Plan; and to otherwise supervise the administration of the Plan.

All decisions and interpretations of the Administrator shall be binding on all persons, including the Company and Plan grantees.

Delegation of Authority to Grant Options.  Subject to applicable law, the Administrator, in its discretion, may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company all or part of the Administrator’s authority and duties with respect to the granting of Options, to individuals who are (i) not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and (ii) not Covered Employees.  Any such delegation by the Administrator shall include a limitation as to the amount of Options that may be granted during the period of the delegation and shall contain guidelines as to the determination of the exercise price and the vesting criteria.  The Administrator may revoke or amend the terms of a delegation at any time but such action shall not invalidate any prior actions of the Administrator’s delegate or delegates that were consistent with the terms of the Plan.

 

 

48

 

 

Award Agreement.  Awards under the Plan shall be evidenced by Award Agreements that set forth the terms, conditions and limitations for each Award which may include, without limitation, the term of an Award and the provisions applicable in the event employment or service terminates.

Indemnification.  Neither the Board nor the Administrator, nor any member of either or any delegate thereof, shall be liable for any act, omission, interpretation, construction or determination made in good faith in connection with the Plan, and the members of the Board and the Administrator (and any delegate thereof) shall be entitled in all cases to indemnification and reimbursement by the Company in respect of any claim, loss, damage or expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising or resulting therefrom to the fullest extent permitted by law and/or under the Company’s articles or bylaws or any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage which may be in effect from time to time and/or any indemnification agreement between such individual and the Company.

Foreign Award Recipients.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate or have employees or other individuals eligible for Awards, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to: (i) determine which Subsidiaries shall be covered by the Plan; (ii) determine which individuals outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan; (iii) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to individuals outside the United States to comply with applicable foreign laws; (iv) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent the Administrator determines such actions to be necessary or advisable (and such subplans and/or modifications shall be attached to this Plan as appendices); provided, however, that no such subplans and/or modifications shall increase the share limitations contained in Section 3(a) hereof; and (v) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that the Administrator determines to be necessary or advisable to obtain approval or comply with any local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate the Exchange Act or any other applicable United States securities law, the Code, or any other applicable United States governing statute or law.

STOCK ISSUABLE UNDER THE PLAN; MERGERS; SUBSTITUTION

Stock Issuable.  The maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (i) 17,000,000, plus (ii) the number of shares of Stock underlying any grants pursuant to this Plan or the Plug Power Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan that are forfeited, canceled, repurchased or are terminated (other than by exercise).  Shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an Option or settlement of an Award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding shall not be available for future issuance under the Plan.  In addition, upon exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights, the gross number of shares exercised shall be deducted from the total number of shares remaining available for issuance under the Plan.  Subject to such overall limitations, shares of Stock may be issued up to such maximum number pursuant to any type or types of Award; provided, however, that Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights with respect to no more than 5,000,000 shares of Stock may be granted to any one individual grantee during any one calendar year period and no more than 17,000,000 shares of Stock shall be issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options.  The shares available for issuance under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of Stock or shares of Stock reacquired by the Company.

Effect of Awards.  The grant of any full value Award (i.e., an Award other than an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right) shall be deemed, solely for purposes of determining the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under Section 3(a) and not for any purpose outside of the Plan, as an Award of 1.5 shares of Stock for each such share of Stock actually subject to the Award.  The grant of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right shall be deemed, for purposes of determining the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under Section 3(a), as an Award for one share of Stock for each such share actually subject to the Award.

 

 

49

 

 

 

Changes in Stock.  Subject to Section 3(d) hereof, if, as a result of any reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or other similar change in the Company’s capital stock, the outstanding shares of Stock are increased or decreased or are exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or other securities of the Company, or additional shares or new or different shares or other securities of the Company or other non-cash assets are distributed with respect to such shares of Stock or other securities, or, if, as a result of any merger or consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, the outstanding shares of Stock are converted into or exchanged for securities of the Company or any successor entity (or a parent or subsidiary thereof), the Administrator shall make an appropriate or proportionate adjustment in (i) the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan, including the maximum number of shares that may be issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options, (ii) the number of Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights that can be granted to any one individual grantee and the maximum number of shares that may be granted under a Performance-Based Award, (iii) the number and kind of shares or other securities subject to any then outstanding Awards under the Plan, (iv) the repurchase price, if any, per share subject to each outstanding Restricted Stock Award, and (v) the price for each share subject to any then outstanding Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights under the Plan, without changing the aggregate exercise price (i.e., the exercise price multiplied by the number of Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights) as to which such Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights remain exercisable.  The Administrator shall also make equitable or proportionate adjustments in the number of shares subject to outstanding Awards and the exercise price and the terms of outstanding Awards to take into consideration cash dividends paid other than in the ordinary course or any other extraordinary corporate event.  The adjustment by the Administrator shall be final, binding and conclusive.  No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued under the Plan resulting from any such adjustment, but the Administrator in its discretion may make a cash payment in lieu of fractional shares.

Mergers and Other Transactions.  Except as the Administrator may otherwise specify with respect to particular Awards in the relevant Award documentation, in the case of and subject to the consummation of a Sale Event, all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights that are not exercisable immediately prior to the effective time of the Sale Event shall become fully exercisable as of the effective time of the Sale Event, all other Awards with time-based vesting, conditions or restrictions shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable as of the effective time of the Sale Event and all Awards with conditions and restrictions relating to the attainment of performance goals may become vested and nonforfeitable in connection with a Sale Event in the Administrator’s discretion, unless, in any case, the parties to the Sale Event agree that Awards will be assumed or continued by the successor entity.  Upon the effective time of the Sale Event,  the Plan and all outstanding Awards granted hereunder shall terminate, unless provision is made in connection with the Sale Event in the sole discretion of the parties thereto for the assumption or continuation of Awards theretofore granted by the successor entity, or the substitution of such Awards with new Awards of the successor entity or parent thereof, with appropriate adjustment as to the number and kind of shares and, if appropriate, the per share exercise prices, as such parties shall agree (after taking into account any acceleration hereunder).   In the event of such termination, (i) the Company shall have the option (in its sole discretion) to make or provide for a cash payment to the grantees holding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, in exchange for the cancellation thereof, in an amount equal to the difference between (A) the Sale Price multiplied by the number of shares of Stock subject to outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (to the extent then exercisable (after taking into account any acceleration hereunder) at prices not in excess of the Sale Price) and (B) the aggregate exercise price of all such outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights; or (ii) each grantee shall be permitted, within a specified period of time prior to the consummation of the Sale Event as determined by the Administrator, to exercise all outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights held by such grantee.

Substitute Awards.  The Administrator may grant Awards under the Plan in substitution for stock and stock based awards held by employees, directors or other key persons of another corporation in connection with the merger or consolidation of the employing corporation with the Company or a Subsidiary or the acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of property or stock of the employing corporation.  The Administrator may direct that the substitute awards be granted on such terms and conditions as the Administrator considers appropriate in the circumstances.  Any substitute Awards granted under the Plan shall not count against the share limitation set forth in Section 3(a).

ELIGIBILITY

Grantees under the Plan will be such full or part-time officers and other employees, Non-Employee Directors and key persons (including consultants and prospective employees) of the Company and its Subsidiaries as are selected from time to time by the Administrator in its sole discretion.

STOCK OPTIONS

Grants of Stock Options.  Any Stock Option granted under the Plan shall be in such form as the Administrator may from time to time approve.

Stock Options granted under the Plan may be either Incentive Stock Options or Non-Qualified Stock Options.  Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to employees of the Company or any Subsidiary that is a “subsidiary corporation” within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code.  To the extent that any Option does not qualify as an Incentive Stock Option, it shall be deemed a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

50

 

 

 

The Administrator in its discretion may grant Stock Options to eligible employees and key persons of the Company or any Subsidiary.  Stock Options granted pursuant to this Section 5(a) shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Administrator shall deem desirable.  If the Administrator so determines, Stock Options may be granted in lieu of cash compensation at the optionee’s election, subject to such terms and conditions as the Administrator may establish.

Exercise Price.  The exercise price per share for the Stock covered by a Stock Option granted pursuant to this Section 5(a) shall be determined by the Administrator at the time of grant but shall not be less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value on the date of grant.  In the case of an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to a Ten Percent Owner, the option price of such Incentive Stock Option shall be not less than 110 percent of the Fair Market Value on the grant date.

Option Term.  The term of each Stock Option shall be fixed by the Administrator, but no Stock Option shall be exercisable more than ten years after the date the Stock Option is granted.  In the case of an Incentive Stock Option that is granted to a Ten Percent Owner, the term of such Stock Option shall be no more than five years from the date of grant.

Exercisability; Rights of a Stockholder.  Stock Options shall become exercisable at such time or times, whether or not in installments, as shall be determined by the Administrator at or after the grant date.  The Administrator may at any time accelerate the exercisability of all or any portion of any Stock Option.  An optionee shall have the rights of a stockholder only as to shares acquired upon the exercise of a Stock Option and not as to unexercised Stock Options.

Method of Exercise.  Stock Options may be exercised in whole or in part, by giving written or electronic notice of exercise to the Company, specifying the number of shares to be purchased.  Payment of the purchase price may be made by one or more of the following methods except to the extent otherwise provided in the Option Award Agreement:

In cash, by certified or bank check or other instrument acceptable to the Administrator;

Through the delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of Stock that are not then subject to restrictions under any Company plan.  Such surrendered shares shall be valued at Fair Market Value on the exercise date; or

By the optionee delivering to the Company a properly executed exercise notice together with irrevocable instructions to a broker to promptly deliver to the Company cash or a check payable and acceptable to the Company for the purchase price; provided that in the event the optionee chooses to pay the purchase price as so provided, the optionee and the broker shall comply with such procedures and enter into such agreements of indemnity and other agreements as the Administrator shall prescribe as a condition of such payment procedure.

With respect to Stock Options that are not Incentive Stock Options, by a “net exercise” arrangement pursuant to which the Company will reduce the number of shares of Stock issuable upon exercise by the largest whole number of shares with a Fair Market Value that does not exceed the aggregate exercise price.

Payment instruments will be received subject to collection.  The transfer to the optionee on the records of the Company or of the transfer agent of the shares of Stock to be purchased pursuant to the exercise of a Stock Option will be contingent upon receipt from the optionee (or a purchaser acting in his stead in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Option) by the Company of the full purchase price for such shares and the fulfillment of any other requirements contained in the Option Award Agreement or applicable provisions of laws (including the satisfaction of any withholding taxes that the Company is obligated to withhold with respect to the optionee).  In the event an optionee chooses to pay the purchase price by previously-owned shares of Stock through the attestation method, the number of shares of Stock transferred to the optionee upon the exercise of the Stock Option shall be net of the number of attested shares.  In the event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the exercise of Stock Options, such as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless exercise of Stock Options may be permitted through the use of such an automated system.

Annual Limit on Incentive Stock Options.  To the extent required for “incentive stock option” treatment under Section 422 of the Code, the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the time of grant) of the shares of Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options granted under this Plan and any other plan of the Company or its parent and subsidiary corporations become exercisable for the first time by an optionee during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000.  To the extent that any Stock Option exceeds this limit, it shall constitute a Non-Qualified Stock Option.

 

 

51

 

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

Exercise Price of Stock Appreciation Rights.  The exercise price of a Stock Appreciation Right shall not be less than 100 percent of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the date of grant.

Grant and Exercise of Stock Appreciation Rights.  Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted by the Administrator independently of any Stock Option granted pursuant to Section 5 of the Plan.

Terms and Conditions of Stock Appreciation Rights.  Stock Appreciation Rights shall be subject to such terms and conditions as shall be determined from time to time by the Administrator.  The term of a Stock Appreciation Right may not exceed ten years.

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

Nature of Restricted Stock Awards.  The Administrator shall determine the restrictions and conditions applicable to each Restricted Stock Award at the time of grant.  Conditions may be based on continuing employment (or other service relationship) and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives.  The grant of a Restricted Stock Award is contingent on the grantee executing the Restricted Stock Award Agreement.  The terms and conditions of each such Award Agreement shall be determined by the Administrator, and such terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and grantees.

Rights as a Stockholder.  Upon execution of the Restricted Stock Award Agreement and payment of any applicable purchase price, a grantee shall have the rights of a stockholder with respect to the voting of the Restricted Stock, subject to such conditions contained in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement.  Unless the Administrator shall otherwise determine, (i) uncertificated Restricted Stock shall be accompanied by a notation on the records of the Company or the transfer agent to the effect that they are subject to forfeiture until such Restricted Stock are vested as provided in Section 7(d) below, and (ii) certificated Restricted Stock shall remain in the possession of the Company until such Restricted Stock is vested as provided in Section 7(d) below, and the grantee shall be required, as a condition of the grant, to deliver to the Company such instruments of transfer as the Administrator may prescribe.

Restrictions.  Restricted Stock may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of except as specifically provided herein or in the Restricted Stock Award Agreement.  Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award Agreement or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award Agreement is issued if a grantee’s employment (or other service relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries terminates for any reason, any Restricted Stock that has not vested at the time of termination shall automatically and without any requirement of notice to such grantee from or other action by or on behalf of, the Company be deemed to have been reacquired by the Company at its original purchase price (if any) from such grantee or such grantee’s legal representative simultaneously with such termination of employment (or other service relationship), and thereafter shall cease to represent any ownership of the Company by the grantee or rights of the grantee as a stockholder.  Following such deemed reacquisition of unvested Restricted Stock that are represented by physical certificates, a grantee shall surrender such certificates to the Company upon request without consideration.

Vesting of Restricted Stock.  The Administrator at the time of grant shall specify the date or dates and/or the attainment of pre-established performance goals, objectives and other conditions on which the non-transferability of the Restricted Stock and the Company’s right of repurchase or forfeiture shall lapse.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any such Restricted Stock granted to employees shall have a performance-based goal, the restriction period with respect to such shares shall not be less than one year, and in the event any such Restricted Stock granted to employees shall have a time-based restriction, the total restriction period with respect to such shares shall not be less than three years; provided, however, that Restricted Stock with a time-based restriction may become vested incrementally over such three-year period.  Subsequent to such date or dates and/or the attainment of such pre-established performance goals, objectives and other conditions, the shares on which all restrictions have lapsed shall no longer be Restricted Stock and shall be deemed “vested.”  Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award Agreement or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award Agreement is issued, a grantee’s rights in any shares of Restricted Stock that have not vested shall automatically terminate upon the grantee’s termination of employment (or other service relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries and such shares shall be subject to the provisions of Section 7(c) above.

 

 

 

52

 

 

DEFERRED STOCK AWARDS

 

Nature of Deferred Stock Awards.   The Administrator shall determine the restrictions and conditions applicable to each Deferred Stock Award at the time of grant.  Conditions may be based on continuing employment (or other service relationship) and/or achievement of pre-established performance goals and objectives.  The grant of a Deferred Stock Award is contingent on the grantee executing the Deferred Stock Award Agreement.  The terms and conditions of each such Award Agreement shall be determined by the Administrator, and such terms and conditions may differ among individual Awards and grantees.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any such Deferred Stock Award granted to employees shall have a performance-based goal, the restriction period with respect to such Award shall not be less than one year, and in the event any such Deferred Stock Award granted to employees shall have a time-based restriction, the total restriction period with respect to such Award shall not be less than three years; provided, however, that any Deferred Stock Award with a time-based restriction may become vested incrementally over such three-year period.  At the end of the deferral period, the Deferred Stock Award, to the extent vested, shall be settled in the form of shares of Stock.  To the extent that a Deferred Stock Award is subject to Section 409A, it may contain such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion in order for such Award to comply with the requirements of Section 409A.

Election to Receive Deferred Stock Awards in Lieu of Compensation.  The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, permit a grantee to elect to receive a portion of future cash compensation otherwise due to such grantee in the form of a Deferred Stock Award.  Any such election shall be made in writing and shall be delivered to the Company no later than the date specified by the Administrator and in accordance with Section 409A and such other rules and procedures established by the Administrator.  Any such future cash compensation that the grantee elects to defer shall be converted to a fixed number of phantom stock units based on the Fair Market Value of Stock on the date the compensation would otherwise have been paid to the grantee if such payment had not been deferred as provided herein.  The Administrator shall have the sole right to determine whether and under what circumstances to permit such elections and to impose such limitations and other terms and conditions thereon as the Administrator deems appropriate. 

Rights as a Stockholder.  A grantee shall have the rights as a stockholder only as to shares of Stock acquired by the grantee upon settlement of a Deferred Stock Award. 

Termination.  Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award Agreement or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award Agreement is issued, a grantee’s right in all Deferred Stock Awards that have not vested shall automatically terminate upon the grantee’s termination of employment (or cessation of service relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason.

UNRESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

Grant or Sale of Unrestricted Stock.  The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, grant (or sell at par value or such higher purchase price determined by the Administrator) an Unrestricted Stock Award under the Plan.  Unrestricted Stock Awards may be granted in respect of past services or other valid consideration, or in lieu of cash compensation due to such grantee.

CASH-BASED AWARDS

Grant of Cash-Based Awards.  The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, grant Cash-Based Awards to any grantee in such number or amount and upon such terms, and subject to such conditions, as the Administrator shall determine at the time of grant.  The Administrator shall determine the maximum duration of the Cash-Based Award, the amount of cash to which the Cash-Based Award pertains, the conditions upon which the Cash-Based Award shall become vested or payable, and such other provisions as the Administrator shall determine.  Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a cash-denominated payment amount, formula or payment ranges as determined by the Administrator.  Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award and may be made in cash or in shares of Stock, as the Administrator determines. 

PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARDS

Nature of Performance Share Awards.  The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, grant Performance Share Awards independent of, or in connection with, the granting of any other Award under the Plan.  The Administrator shall determine whether and to whom Performance Share Awards shall be granted, the Performance Goals, the periods during which performance is to be measured, which may not be less than one year, and such other limitations and conditions as the Administrator shall determine.

Rights as a Stockholder.  A grantee receiving a Performance Share Award shall have the rights of a stockholder only as to shares actually received by the grantee under the Plan and not with respect to shares subject to the Award but not actually received by the grantee.  A grantee shall be entitled to receive shares of Stock under a Performance Share Award only upon satisfaction of all conditions specified in the Performance Share Award agreement (or in a performance plan adopted by the Administrator).

53

 

 

Termination.  Except as may otherwise be provided by the Administrator either in the Award agreement or, subject to Section 17 below, in writing after the Award agreement is issued, a grantee’s rights in all Performance Share Awards shall automatically terminate upon the grantee’s termination of employment (or cessation of service relationship) with the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason.

PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS TO COVERED EMPLOYEES

Performance-Based Awards.  Any employee or other key person providing services to the Company and who is selected by the Administrator may be granted one or more Performance-Based Awards in the form of a Restricted Stock Award, Deferred Stock Award, Performance Share Awards or Cash-Based Award payable upon the attainment of Performance Goals that are established by the Administrator and relate to one or more of the Performance Criteria, in each case on a specified date or dates or over any period or periods determined by the Administrator.  The Administrator shall define in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the Performance Criteria it selects to use for any Performance Cycle.  Depending on the Performance Criteria used to establish such Performance Goals, the Performance Goals may be expressed in terms of overall Company performance or the performance of a division, business unit, or an individual.  The Administrator, in its discretion, may adjust or modify the calculation of Performance Goals for such Performance Cycle in order to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of an individual (i) in the event of, or in anticipation of, any unusual or extraordinary corporate item, transaction, event or development, (ii) in recognition of, or in anticipation of, any other unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company, or the financial statements of the Company, or (iii) in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, or business conditions provided however, that the Administrator may not exercise such discretion in a manner that would increase the Performance-Based Award granted to a Covered Employee.  Each Performance-Based Award shall comply with the provisions set forth below.

Grant of Performance-Based Awards.  With respect to each Performance-Based Award granted to a Covered Employee, the Administrator shall select, within the first 90 days of a Performance Cycle (or, if shorter, within the maximum period allowed under Section 162(m) of the Code) the Performance Criteria for such grant, and the Performance Goals with respect to each Performance Criterion (including a threshold level of performance below which no amount will become payable with respect to such Award).  Each Performance-Based Award will specify the amount payable, or the formula for determining the amount payable, upon achievement of the various applicable performance targets.  The Performance Criteria established by the Administrator may be (but need not be) different for each Performance Cycle and different Performance Goals may be applicable to Performance-Based Awards to different Covered Employees.

Payment of Performance-Based Awards.  Following the completion of a Performance Cycle, the Administrator shall meet to review and certify in writing whether, and to what extent, the Performance Goals for the Performance Cycle have been achieved and, if so, to also calculate and certify in writing the amount of the Performance-Based Awards earned for the Performance Cycle.  The Administrator shall then determine the actual size of each Covered Employee’s Performance-Based Award, and, in doing so, may reduce or eliminate the amount of the Performance-Based Award for a Covered Employee if, in its sole judgment, such reduction or elimination is appropriate.

Maximum Award Payable.  The maximum Performance-Based Award payable to any one Covered Employee under the Plan for any Performance Cycle is 2,500,000 Shares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(c) hereof) or $7,500,000 in the case of a Performance-Based Award that is a Cash-Based Award.

Transferability of Awards

Transferability.  Except as provided in Section 13(b) below, during a grantee’s lifetime, his or her Awards shall be exercisable only by the grantee, or by the grantee’s legal representative or guardian in the event of the grantee’s incapacity.  No Awards shall be sold, assigned, transferred or otherwise encumbered or disposed of by a grantee other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order.  No Awards shall be subject, in whole or in part, to attachment, execution, or levy of any kind, and any purported transfer in violation hereof shall be null and void.

Administrator Action.  Notwithstanding Section 13(a), the Administrator, in its discretion, may provide either in the Award Agreement regarding a given Award or by subsequent written approval that the grantee (who is an employee or director) may transfer his or her Awards (other than any Incentive Stock Options or Deferred Stock Awards) to his or her immediate family members, to trusts for the benefit of such family members, or to partnerships in which such family members are the only partners, provided that the transferee agrees in writing with the Company to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Plan and the applicable Award.

 

 

54

 

Family Member.  For purposes of Section 13(b), “family member” shall mean a grantee’s child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive relationships, any person sharing the grantee’s household (other than a tenant of the grantee), a trust in which these persons (or the grantee) have more than 50 percent of the beneficial interest, a foundation in which these persons (or the grantee) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the grantee) own more than 50 percent of the voting interests.

Designation of Beneficiary.  Each grantee to whom an Award has been made under the Plan may designate a beneficiary or beneficiaries to exercise any Award or receive any payment under any Award payable on or after the grantee’s death.  Any such designation shall be on a form provided for that purpose by the Administrator and shall not be effective until received by the Administrator.  If no beneficiary has been designated by a deceased grantee, or if the designated beneficiaries have predeceased the grantee, the beneficiary shall be the grantee’s estate.

TAX WITHHOLDING

Payment by Grantee.  Each grantee shall, no later than the date as of which the value of an Award or of any Stock or other amounts received thereunder first becomes includable in the gross income of the grantee for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator regarding payment of, any Federal, state, or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld by the Company with respect to such income.  The Company and its Subsidiaries shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the grantee.  The Company’s obligation to deliver evidence of book entry (or stock certificates) to any grantee is subject to and conditioned on tax withholding obligations being satisfied by the grantee.

Payment in Stock.  Subject to approval by the Administrator, a grantee may elect to have the Company’s minimum required tax withholding obligation satisfied, in whole or in part, by authorizing the Company to withhold from shares of Stock to be issued pursuant to any Award a number of shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date the withholding is effected) that would satisfy the withholding amount due.

Section 409A awards. 

To the extent that any Award is determined to constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A (a “409A Award”), the Award shall be subject to such additional rules and requirements as specified by the Administrator from time to time in order to comply with Section 409A.  In this regard, if any amount under a 409A Award is payable upon a “separation from service” (within the meaning of Section 409A) to a grantee who is then considered a “specified employee” (within the meaning of Section 409A), then no such payment shall be made prior to the date that is the earlier of (i) six months and one day after the grantee’s separation from service, or (ii) the grantee’s death, but only to the extent such delay is necessary to prevent such payment from being subject to interest, penalties and/or additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A.  Further, the settlement of any such Award may not be accelerated except to the extent permitted by Section 409A.

TRANSFER, LEAVE OF ABSENCE, ETC.

For purposes of the Plan, the following events shall not be deemed a termination of employment:

a transfer to the employment of the Company from a Subsidiary or from the Company to a Subsidiary, or from one Subsidiary to another; or

an approved leave of absence for military service or sickness, or for any other purpose approved by the Company, if the employee’s right to re-employment is guaranteed either by a statute or by contract or under the policy pursuant to which the leave of absence was granted or if the Administrator otherwise so provides in writing.

 

55

 

 

 

AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION

 

The Board may, at any time, amend or discontinue the Plan and the Administrator may, at any time, amend or cancel any outstanding Award for the purpose of satisfying changes in law or for any other lawful purpose, but no such action shall adversely affect rights under any outstanding Award without the holder’s consent.  Except as provided in Section 3(c) or 3(d), without prior stockholder approval, in no event may the Administrator exercise its discretion to reduce the exercise price of outstanding Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights or effect repricing through cancellation and re-grants of Options or other Awards.  To the extent required under the rules of any securities exchange or market system on which the Stock is listed, to the extent determined by the Administrator to be required by the Code to ensure that Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan are qualified under Section 422 of the Code, or to ensure that compensation earned under Awards qualifies as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, Plan amendments shall be subject to approval by the Company stockholders entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders.  Nothing in this Section 17 shall limit the Administrator’s authority to take any action permitted pursuant to Section 3(d).

STATUS OF PLAN

With respect to the portion of any Award that has not been exercised and any payments in cash, Stock or other consideration not received by a grantee, a grantee shall have no rights greater than those of a general creditor of the Company unless the Administrator shall otherwise expressly determine in connection with any Award or Awards.  In its sole discretion, the Administrator may authorize the creation of trusts or other arrangements to meet the Company’s obligations to deliver Stock or make payments with respect to Awards hereunder, provided that the existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent with the foregoing sentence.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

No Distribution.  The Administrator may require each person acquiring Stock pursuant to an Award to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that such person is acquiring the shares without a view to distribution thereof.

Delivery of Stock Certificates.  Stock certificates to grantees under this Plan shall be deemed delivered for all purposes when the Company or a stock transfer agent of the Company shall have mailed such certificates in the United States mail, addressed to the grantee, at the grantee’s last known address on file with the Company.  Uncertificated Stock shall be deemed delivered for all purposes when the Company or a Stock transfer agent of the Company shall have given to the grantee by electronic mail (with proof of receipt) or by United States mail, addressed to the grantee, at the grantee’s last known address on file with the Company, notice of issuance and recorded the issuance in its records (which may include electronic “book entry” records).  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificates evidencing shares of Stock pursuant to the exercise of any Award, unless and until the Administrator has determined, with advice of counsel (to the extent the Administrator deems such advice necessary or advisable), that the issuance and delivery of such certificates is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations of governmental authorities and, if applicable, the requirements of any exchange on which the shares of Stock are listed, quoted or traded.  All Stock certificates delivered pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to any stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Administrator deems necessary or advisable to comply with federal, state or foreign jurisdiction, securities or other laws, rules and quotation system on which the Stock is listed, quoted or traded.  The Administrator may place legends on any Stock certificate to reference restrictions applicable to the Stock.  In addition to the terms and conditions provided herein, the Administrator may require that an individual make such reasonable covenants, agreements, and representations as the Administrator, in its discretion, deems necessary or advisable in order to comply with any such laws, regulations, or requirements.  The Administrator shall have the right to require any individual to comply with any timing or other restrictions with respect to the settlement or exercise of any Award, including a window-period limitation, as may be imposed in the discretion of the Administrator. 

Stockholder Rights.  Until Stock is deemed delivered in accordance with Section 19(b), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights of a stockholder will exist with respect to shares of Stock to be issued in connection with an Award, notwithstanding the exercise of a Stock Option or any other action by the grantee with respect to an Award.

Other Compensation Arrangements; No Employment Rights.  Nothing contained in this Plan shall prevent the Board from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements, including trusts, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases.  The adoption of this Plan and the grant of Awards do not confer upon any employee any right to continued employment with the Company or any Subsidiary.

Trading Policy Restrictions.  Option exercises and other Awards under the Plan shall be subject to the Company’s insider trading policies and procedures, as in effect from time to time.

 

 

56

 

 

Forfeiture of Awards under Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, then any grantee who is one of the individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 shall reimburse the Company for the amount of any Award received by such individual under the Plan during the 12-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, as the case may be, of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement.

EFFECTIVE DATE OF PLAN

This Plan, as amended and restated, shall become effective upon approval by the holders of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of stockholders at which a quorum is present.  No grants of Stock Options and other Awards may be made hereunder after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date and no grants of Incentive Stock Options may be made hereunder after the tenth anniversary of the date the Plan, as amended and restated, is approved by the Board.

GOVERNING LAW

This Plan and all Awards and actions taken thereunder shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, applied without regard to conflict of law principles.

DATE APPROVED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS: April 22, 2014

DATE APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX B

 

THIRD CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
PLUG POWER INC.

 

Plug Power Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies as follows:

FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation has duly adopted resolutions (i) authorizing the Corporation to execute and file with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware this Third Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (this “Third Amendment”) to increase the authorized capital stock of the Corporation from 250,000,000 shares to 455,000,000 shares; and (ii) declaring this Third Amendment to be advisable, submitted to and considered by the stockholders of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon for approval by the affirmative vote of such stockholders in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended by the Certificate of Amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated June 21, 2000 and the Second Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated May 19, 2011 (collectively, the “Certificate of Incorporation”), and Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) and recommended for approval by the stockholders of the Corporation.

SECOND: That this Third Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation and the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL by the Board of Directors and stockholders of the Corporation.

THIRD: That upon the effectiveness of this Third Amendment, the first paragraph of Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby deleted and is replaced in its entirety by the following:

“The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Four Hundred and Fifty Five Million (455,000,000) shares, of which (i) Four Hundred and Fifty Million (450,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, and (ii) Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be undesignated preferred stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Undesignated Preferred Stock”).”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Third Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by Andrew Marsh, its President and Chief Executive Officer, this __ day of _______, 2014.

PLUG POWER INC.


By:


______________________________
Andrew Marsh
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

58

 

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:                    T KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
  DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED

 

       To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s) mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of  the nominee(s) on the line below     

 

 For Withhold For All   

 

 All All  Except      

The Board of Directors recommends

           

you vote  FOR the following:                                         

           

 

            

1. Election of Directors: 

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

   Nominees

           

 

            

01 Larry G. Gerberding       02. Douglas T. Hickey

            
             
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.        For Against  Abstain
             

2.             The approval of  an amendment and restatement of the Company’s   

       ¨ ¨ ¨

                2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

            

 

            

3.             The approval of  the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Amended     

       ¨ ¨ ¨

                and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase

            

                the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by 205,000,000 shares        

           

 

            

4.             The approval of  an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of

      ¨ ¨ ¨

                the Company’s named executed officers

            

 

            

5.             The ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors     

       ¨ ¨ ¨

 

NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

For address change/comments mark here.       ¨

(see reverse for instructions)

  Yes No

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting   

 ¨  ¨
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon.  When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such.  Joint owners should each sign personally.  All holders must sign.  If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

 

59

 

FOR SECURITY PURPOSES, PLEASE BRING A VALID PICTURE ID IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING

 

 

 

Importance Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Form 10-K is/are available at www.proxyvote.com

 

 

 

Annual Meeting of Stockholders of

PLUG POWER INC.

July 23, 2014 at 10:00 AM Eastern Time

 

The stockholder(s) hereby appoints Gerard L. Conway, Jr. as proxy, with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes him to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of PLUG POWER INC. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time on July 23, 2014, at the offices of Goodwin Procter LLP, The New York Times Building, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER(S).  IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES NAMED IN ITEM 1, “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE COMPANY’S 2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN IN ITEM 2, “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE THIRD CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY IN ITEM 3, “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION REGARDING THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTED OFFICERS IN ITEM 4 AND “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2014 IN ITEM 5. 

 

 

 

 

Address change/comments:

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

60

 

PLUG POWER INC.

968 Albany Shaker Road

Latham, NY 12110

 

AIR LIQUIDE INVESTISSEMENTS D’AVENIR ET DE DEMONSTRATION

25 rue Marbeuf

75008 Paris

France

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED

 

 

 

       To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s) mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of  the nominee(s) on the line below     

 

 For Against For All   

 

 All All  Except      

The Board of Directors recommends

           

you vote  FOR the following:                                         

           

 

            

1.             Election of Directors: 

 ¨ ¨ ¨      

 

            

 

            

01 Larry G. Gerberding       02. Douglas T. Hickey

            

 

            

 

            

The Board of Directors recommends you vote

            

FOR proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5     

        For Against  Abstain

 

            

2.             The approval of  an amendment and restatement of the Company’s   

       ¨ ¨ ¨

                2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

            

 

            

3.             The approval of  the Third Certificate of Amendment of the Amended     

       ¨ ¨ ¨

                and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase

            

                the number of authorized shares of Common Stock by 205,000,000 shares        

           

 

            

4.             The approval of  an advisory resolution regarding the compensation of

      ¨ ¨ ¨

                the Company’s named executed officers

            

 

            

5.             The ratification of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors     

       ¨ ¨ ¨

               

 

NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

 

For address change/comments mark here.       ¨

(see reverse for instructions)

 

                                                                                                                        

  Yes No

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting   

 ¨  ¨

 

 

Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon.  When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such.  Joint owners should each sign personally.  All holders must sign.  If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

 

 

______________________________          ________

Signature                                                               Date

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

 

 

FOR SECURITY PURPOSES, PLEASE BRING A VALID PICTURE ID IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING

 

 

 

Importance Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Form 10-K is/are available at www.proxyvote.com

 

 

 

Annual Meeting of Stockholders of

PLUG POWER INC.

July 23, 2014 at 10:00 AM Eastern Time

 

The stockholder hereby appoints Gerard L. Conway, Jr. as proxy, with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes him to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Preferred Stock (on an as-converted to Common Stock basis) of PLUG POWER INC. that the stockholder is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time on July 23, 2014, at the offices of Goodwin Procter LLP, The New York Times Building, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER.  IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES NAMED IN ITEM 1, “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE COMPANY’S 2011 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN IN ITEM 2, “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE THIRD CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY IN ITEM 3, “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION REGARDING THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTED OFFICERS IN ITEM 4 AND “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF KPMG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2014 IN ITEM 5. 

 

 

 

 

Address change/comments:

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

 

 

 

 

 

62