Libbey Inc. 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-12084
Libbey Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
34-1559357 |
|
|
|
(State or other
|
|
(IRS Employer |
jurisdiction of
|
|
Identification No.) |
incorporation or |
|
|
organization) |
|
|
300 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43604
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
419-325-2100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company. Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $.01 par value 14,301,626 shares at Oct 31, 2006.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Libbey Inc. and all
majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, Libbey or the Company) have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Item 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2005, has been derived from the audited financial statements at
that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
3
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
183,256 |
|
|
$ |
135,573 |
|
Freight billed to customers |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
184,260 |
|
|
|
136,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
152,692 |
|
|
|
108,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
31,568 |
|
|
|
27,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
20,729 |
|
|
|
16,788 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
10,839 |
|
|
|
9,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss pretax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
Other (loss) income |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
9,106 |
|
|
|
9,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
15,551 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(6,445 |
) |
|
|
6,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Credit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3,116 |
) |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before minority interest |
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.025 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per-share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
476,120 |
|
|
$ |
409,895 |
|
Freight billed to customers |
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
478,507 |
|
|
|
411,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
396,621 |
|
|
|
335,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
81,886 |
|
|
|
75,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
59,511 |
|
|
|
55,109 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
9,788 |
|
|
|
12,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings (loss) pretax |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
Other (loss) income |
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
9,530 |
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
29,360 |
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest |
|
|
(19,830 |
) |
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Credit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(7,535 |
) |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before minority interest |
|
|
(12,295 |
) |
|
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
0.075 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
37,804 |
|
|
$ |
3,242 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
104,708 |
|
|
|
79,042 |
|
Inventories net |
|
|
167,859 |
|
|
|
122,572 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
8,270 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
14,075 |
|
|
|
10,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
327,975 |
|
|
|
223,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair parts inventories |
|
|
12,514 |
|
|
|
6,322 |
|
Intangible pension asset |
|
|
17,251 |
|
|
|
17,251 |
|
Software net |
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
4,561 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
952 |
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,657 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
20,706 |
|
|
|
4,397 |
|
Purchased intangible assets net |
|
|
29,722 |
|
|
|
10,778 |
|
Goodwill net |
|
|
167,033 |
|
|
|
50,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
251,813 |
|
|
|
171,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
309,777 |
|
|
|
200,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
889,565 |
|
|
$ |
595,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
11,475 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
73,559 |
|
|
|
47,020 |
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
22,289 |
|
|
|
16,043 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
50,645 |
|
|
|
36,901 |
|
Derivative liability |
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Special charges reserve |
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,131 |
|
Long-term debt due within one year |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
155,623 |
|
|
|
121,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debtnet |
|
|
484,035 |
|
|
|
249,379 |
|
Pension liability |
|
|
78,061 |
|
|
|
54,760 |
|
Nonpension postretirement benefits |
|
|
43,673 |
|
|
|
45,081 |
|
Payable to Vitro |
|
|
19,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
5,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
785,161 |
|
|
|
476,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities including minority interest |
|
|
785,261 |
|
|
|
476,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 18,689,710 shares issued (18,689,710 shares issued in
2005) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Capital in excess of par value (includes warrants of $1,034, and
485,309 shares as of September 30, 2006 and no warrants at December
31, 2005) |
|
|
302,479 |
|
|
|
301,025 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 4,405,509 shares (4,681,721 shares in 2005) |
|
|
(129,968 |
) |
|
|
(132,520 |
) |
Retained deficit |
|
|
(31,388 |
) |
|
|
(17,966 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(37,006 |
) |
|
|
(31,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
104,304 |
|
|
|
119,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
889,565 |
|
|
$ |
595,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
6
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,671 |
|
|
|
9,160 |
|
Equity loss net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
791 |
|
Change in accounts receivable |
|
|
(2,624 |
) |
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
Change in inventories |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
|
(11,773 |
) |
Change in accounts payable |
|
|
17,373 |
|
|
|
11,516 |
|
Change in derivative liability |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
(9,868 |
) |
Special charges |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(2,356 |
) |
Pension & nonpension postretirement |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(12,241 |
) |
|
|
979 |
|
Other operating activities |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
11,149 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(20,301 |
) |
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
Business acquisition and related costs, less cash acquired |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(20,725 |
) |
|
|
(7,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revolving credit facility activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
Net ABL credit facility activity |
|
|
8,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other net (repayments) borrowings |
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
3,514 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
12,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt financing fees |
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
20,646 |
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
11,143 |
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
26,661 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
37,804 |
|
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the quarter for interest |
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
2,448 |
|
Cash paid (net of refunds received) during the quarter for income taxes |
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
See accompanying notes
7
LIBBEY INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,212 |
|
|
|
25,611 |
|
Equity (earnings) loss net of tax |
|
|
(1,378 |
) |
|
|
967 |
|
Change in accounts receivable |
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
Change in inventories |
|
|
(2,678 |
) |
|
|
(16,284 |
) |
Change in accounts payable |
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
3,630 |
|
Change in derivative liability |
|
|
13,986 |
|
|
|
(14,289 |
) |
Payable to Vito |
|
|
(9,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Special charges |
|
|
18,859 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
Pension & nonpension postretirement |
|
|
9,428 |
|
|
|
4,538 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(16,979 |
) |
|
|
(4,804 |
) |
Other operating activities |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
14,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
31,524 |
|
|
|
12,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(54,557 |
) |
|
|
(26,503 |
) |
Business acquisition and related costs, less cash acquired |
|
|
(77,995 |
) |
|
|
(28,990 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(132,552 |
) |
|
|
(55,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revolving credit facility activity |
|
|
(147,142 |
) |
|
|
35,910 |
|
Net ABL credit facility activity |
|
|
51,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other net (repayments) borrowings |
|
|
(81,455 |
) |
|
|
6,227 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
27,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note payments |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Note proceeds |
|
|
399,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt financing fees |
|
|
(15,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
(4,162 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
135,412 |
|
|
|
37,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
34,562 |
|
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
37,804 |
|
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
9,734 |
|
|
$ |
8,726 |
|
Cash paid (net of refunds received) during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
6,770 |
|
|
$ |
5,198 |
|
See accompanying notes
8
LIBBEY INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Dollars in thousands, except per share data
(unaudited)
1. Description of the Business
Libbey is the leading supplier of tableware products in the Western Hemisphere, in addition to
supplying to key export markets in the Eastern Hemisphere. Established in 1818, we have the largest
manufacturing, distribution and service network among North American glass tableware manufacturers.
We design and market an extensive line of high-quality glass tableware, ceramic dinnerware, metal
flatware, hollowware and serveware, and plastic items to a broad group of customers in the
foodservice, retail, business-to-business and industrial markets. We also import and distribute
various products. Prior to June 16, 2006, we owned 49 percent of Vitrocrisa Holding, S. de R.L. de
C.V. and related companies (Crisa), one of the largest glass tableware manufacturers in Mexico and
Latin America, based in Monterrey, Mexico. On June 16, 2006, we acquired the remaining 51 percent
interest of Crisa. See note 4 for additional details on the acquisition.
We own and operate two glass tableware manufacturing plants in the United States; glass tableware
manufacturing plants in the Netherlands and in Portugal; and two glass tableware manufacturing
plants in Mexico. In addition, we expect to begin production at our new green-meadow production
facility in China in early 2007. We also own and operate a ceramic dinnerware plant in New York and
a plastics plant in Wisconsin. In addition, we import products from overseas in order to complement
our line of manufactured items. The combination of manufacturing and procurement allows us to
compete in the tableware market by offering an extensive product line at competitive prices.
Our website can be found at www.libbey.com. We make available, free of charge, at this website all
of our reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, including our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our Current
Reports on Form 8-K, as well as amendments to those reports. These reports are made available on
the website as soon as reasonably practicable after their filing with, or furnishing to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
See our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for a description of significant accounting
policies not listed below.
Basis of Presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include Libbey Inc. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries (collectively, Libbey or the Company). Our fiscal year end is December 31st. Prior to
June 16, 2006, we recorded our 49 percent interest in Crisa using the equity method. On June 16,
2006, we acquired the remaining 51 percent of Crisa; as a result, effective that date Crisas
results are included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Prior to October 13, 2006,
we owned 95 percent of Crisal-Cristalaria Automatica S.A. (Crisal). Our 95 percent controlling
interest in Crisal that we owned prior to October 13, 2006 requires that Crisals operations be
included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The 5 percent equity interest of
Crisal that we did not own prior to October 13, 2006 is shown as minority interest in the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. On October 13, 2006, we
acquired the remaining 5 percent of Crisal (see
footnote 16). All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The
preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
accompanying notes. All material estimates and assumptions are normal and recurring in nature.
Actual results could differ materially from managements estimates.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Net sales in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations include revenue earned when
products are shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. Sales are recorded net
of returns, discounts and incentives offered to customers. Cost of sales includes cost to
manufacture and/or purchase products, warehouse, shipping and delivery costs, royalty expense and
other costs.
9
Foreign Currency Translation
Our European and Chinese foreign subsidiaries financial statements are translated at current
exchange rates for the euro and the Chinese RMB, and any related translation adjustments are
recorded directly in shareholders equity. Our Mexican subsidiary (Crisa) uses the U.S. dollar as
the functional currency. As a result, Crisas financial statements have been remeasured from
Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars using (i) current exchange rates for monetary asset and liability
accounts, (ii) historical exchange rates for nonmonetary asset and liability accounts, (iii)
historical exchange rates for revenues and expenses associated with nonmonetary assets and
liabilities and (iv) the weighted average exchange rate of the reporting period for all other
revenues and expenses. The resulting remeasurement gain (loss) is recorded in earnings before
interest and income taxes.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. FAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires that a
valuation allowance be recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined
separately for each tax jurisdiction in which the Company conducts its operations or otherwise
incurs taxable income or losses. In the United States, the Company has recorded deferred tax
assets, the largest of which relate to pension and nonpension postretirement benefits. The
deferred tax assets are partially offset by deferred tax liabilities, the most significant of which
relate to accelerated depreciation. Losses before income taxes have been incurred in recent years
and though the risk of not realizing the deferred tax asset exists we believe it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized through loss carrybacks and the effects of
tax planning.
New Accounting Standards
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting
Changes in Interim Financial Statements(Statement 154). Statement 154 changes the requirements for
the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Previously, most voluntary
changes in accounting principles were required to be recognized via a cumulative effect adjustment
within net income of the period of change. Statement 154 requires retrospective application to
prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the
period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Statement 154 is effective for
accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of
Statement 154 had no effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,(statement 158) which is an amendment to FASB
Statement Nos. 86, 87, 106 and 132-R. Statement 158 requires an employer to recognize the
overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability
in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year
in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity. This statement also
requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end
statement of financial position. In previous standards, the employer was required to disclose the
complete funded status of its plans only in the notes to the financial statements.
Statement 158 is effective for publicly held companies for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2006. Libbey will adopt the balance sheet recognition provisions of Statement 158 at December 31,
2006. The adoption of Statement 158 is expected to reduce Libbeys stockholders equity at
December 31, 2006 by approximately $20-25 million pre-tax. This Statement does not affect the results of
operations.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation used in the current year financial statements.
10
3. Balance Sheet Details
The following table provides detail of selected balance sheet items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
$ |
99,186 |
|
|
$ |
75,470 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
5,522 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, less allowances of $11,329 and $8,342 |
|
$ |
104,708 |
|
|
$ |
79,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
156,414 |
|
|
$ |
112,058 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
4,456 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
Operating supplies |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
167,859 |
|
|
$ |
122,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
14,075 |
|
|
$ |
3,142 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total prepaid and other current assets |
|
$ |
14,075 |
|
|
$ |
10,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,386 |
|
Finance fees net of amortization |
|
|
14,677 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,876 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
$ |
20,706 |
|
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued incentives |
|
$ |
12,823 |
|
|
$ |
14,306 |
|
Workers compensation |
|
|
9,286 |
|
|
|
9,134 |
|
Medical liabilities |
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
Interest |
|
|
17,873 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
Commissions payable |
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
858 |
|
Accrued non income taxes |
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
7,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
50,645 |
|
|
$ |
36,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred liability |
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
$ |
877 |
|
Guarantee of Crisa debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
|
$ |
5,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Acquisitions
On June 16, 2006, we purchased the remaining 51 percent of the shares of Vitrocrisa Holding, S. de
R.L. de C.V. and related companies (Crisa) located in Monterrey, Mexico, from Vitro, S.A. de C.V.,
bringing our ownership in Crisa to 100 percent. The purchase price of this acquisition was $84
million, including acquisition costs. In addition, we refinanced approximately $71.9 million of
Crisas existing indebtedness, of which the Company guaranteed $23 million prior to the purchase
of the remaining 51 percent of the shares of Crisa. In connection with the acquisition, Crisa
transferred to Vitro the pension liability for Crisa employees who had retired as of the closing
date. Vitro also agreed to forgive $0.4 million of net intercompany payables owed to it and to
defer receipt of approximately $9.4 million of net intercompany payables until August 15, 2006, and
approximately $19.5 million (212.9 million pesos) of net intercompany payables until January 15,
2008. In addition, Vitro waived its right to receive profit sharing payments of approximately $1.3
million from Libbey under the now-terminated distribution agreement. Vitro also transferred to
Crisa ownership of racks and conveyors valued at approximately $3.0 million that Crisa leased from
an affiliate of Vitro. Vitro agreed to provide transition services to Crisa for a period of three
years and agreed to fix the charges for those services for the first two years at 2005 rates. In
addition, Crisa is entitled to a credit against these charges in an amount equal to $0.63 million
per year for the first two years.
11
Crisa is the largest glass tableware manufacturer in Latin America and has approximately 63 percent
of the glass tableware market in Mexico. This acquisition is consistent with our strategy to expand
our manufacturing platform into low-cost countries in order to become a more cost-competitive
source of high-quality glass tableware.
In establishing the opening balance sheet under step acquisition accounting, we recorded 49 percent
of the historical book value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Crisa due to our
existing 49 percent ownership of Crisa, and 51 percent of the fair values of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition. These values represent preliminary estimates
that will be finalized in the future when the final fair value of assets and liabilities are
determined. The following is a summary of 51 percent of the preliminarily assigned fair values of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
37,017 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
46,673 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
19,584 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,454 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
47,601 |
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
154,329 |
|
Less liabilities assumed: |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
63,386 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
6,519 |
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
69,905 |
|
|
Cash purchase price |
|
|
84,424 |
|
Less: Cash acquired |
|
|
6,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash purchase price, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
77,995 |
|
|
The following table is a summary of the preliminary goodwill created by the excess of the purchase
price over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of the
preliminary purchase price allocation. This table provides the details for 100 percent of the
goodwill created by the purchase of the remaining 51 percent interest in Crisa:
|
|
|
|
|
Inferred enterprise purchase price ($80 million divided by 51 percent) |
|
$ |
156,863 |
|
Less: assets received/liabilities forgiven |
|
|
(4,688 |
) |
Add: estimated direct acquisition costs |
|
|
4,424 |
|
|
Aggregate enterprise purchase price |
|
|
156,599 |
|
Add: fair value liabilities assumed |
|
|
155,593 |
|
Less: fair value assets acquired |
|
|
(221,949 |
) |
|
Inferred goodwill of 51 percent purchase |
|
|
90,243 |
|
Equity interest acquired |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
Preliminary goodwill of 51 percent purchase |
|
|
46,024 |
|
Adjustments to step acquisition accounting |
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
Total goodwill of 51 percent purchase after adjustments |
|
|
47,601 |
|
Add: goodwill recorded on existing 49 percent ownership interest |
|
|
69,347 |
|
|
Enterprise goodwill |
|
$ |
116,948 |
|
|
Intangible assets acquired of approximately $19.6 million consist of trademarks and trade names,
patented technologies, customer lists, and non-compete covenants. The patented technologies,
customer lists, and non-compete covenants are being amortized over an average life of 9.6 years.
Amortization of these intangible assets was $0.3 million for the quarter and nine-month period
ended September 30, 2006. Trademarks and trade names are valued at approximately $8.2 million and
are not subject to amortization.
Crisas results of operations are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements starting June
16, 2006. Prior to June 16, 2006, 49 percent of Crisas earnings were accounted for under the
equity method.
12
The proforma unaudited results of operations including Crisa for the three months ended September
30, 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2006, assuming the acquisition had been
consummated as of January 1, 2006, along with comparative results for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and nine months ended September 30, 2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
183,256 |
|
|
$ |
175,595 |
|
|
|
$ |
550,192 |
|
|
$ |
528,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and taxes |
|
$ |
9,128 |
|
|
$ |
14,614 |
|
|
|
$ |
36,437 |
|
|
$ |
35,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from operations |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
5,341 |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,740 |
) |
|
$ |
6,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
11,060 |
|
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
|
|
$ |
33,298 |
|
|
$ |
35,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges included in
the proforma table above are detailed below (see Note 6): |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Total pretax special charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,036 |
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
|
$ |
12,422 |
|
|
$ |
6,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, we announced plans to consolidate, Crisas two principal manufacturing facilities
into a single facility, in order to reduce fixed costs. In connection with this consolidation, we
recognized special charges of approximately $15.1 million in the second quarter of 2006 (additional
charges could be recognized as we finalize the step acquisition accounting), which are described in
Note 6. In addition, a $2.7 million reserve related to statutory severance for approximately 600
hourly employees of Crisa was established and is included in special charges reserve on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. We expect to experience a cost savings of $13 to $15 million
associated with the consolidation.
5. Borrowings
Our borrowings, prior to the refinancing consummated on June 16, 2006, consisted of a revolving
credit and swing line facility permitting borrowings up to an aggregate total of $195 million, $100
million of privately placed senior notes, a $2.7 million promissory note in connection with the
purchase of our Laredo, Texas warehouse, a euro-based working capital line for a maximum of 10
million, and other borrowings including the RMB Loan Contract described below and other debt
related to Crisal.
On June 16, 2006, Libbey Glass Inc. issued, pursuant to private offerings, $306 million aggregate
principal amount of floating rate senior secured notes and $102 million aggregate principal amount
of 16 percent senior subordinated secured pay-in-kind notes (PIK Notes) both due 2011.
Concurrently, Libbey Glass Inc. entered into a new $150 million Asset Based Loan facility (ABL
Facility), expiring in 2010.
Proceeds from these transactions were immediately used to repay existing bank and private placement
indebtedness. In addition, proceeds were used for the acquisition of the remaining 51 percent
equity interest in Crisa, for $80 million, bringing our ownership of Crisa to 100 percent; for
repayment of existing Crisa indebtedness of approximately $71.9 million; and for related fees,
expenses and redemption premiums of Libbey and Crisa. Unamortized finance fees in the amount of
$4.9 million related to the refinanced debt of Libbey and Crisa were also written off in the second
quarter of 2006 and classified as interest expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
13
Borrowings consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity Date |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility |
|
floating |
|
June 24, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143,814 |
|
Borrowings under ABL facility |
|
floating |
|
December 16, 2010 |
|
|
52,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
4.69% |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
6.08% |
|
March 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
floating |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
floating (see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured notes |
|
Agreements below) |
|
June 1, 2011 |
|
|
306,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
PIK notes |
|
16.00% |
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note |
|
6.00% |
|
October 2006 to September |
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
floating |
|
October 2006 |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
11,475 |
|
RMB loan contract |
|
floating |
|
July 2012 to December 2012 |
|
|
27,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
floating |
|
October 2006 to May 2007 |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
Other debt |
|
floating |
|
September 2009 |
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,839 |
|
|
|
261,679 |
|
Less unamortized discounts and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,282 |
|
|
|
261,679 |
|
Less current portion of borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
Total long-term portion of borrowings net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
484,035 |
|
|
$ |
249,379 |
|
|
ABL Facility
The ABL Facility is with a group of banks and provides for a revolving credit and swing line
facility permitting borrowings up to an aggregate of $150 million, with Libbey Europe B.V.s
borrowings being limited to $75 million. Borrowings under the ABL Facility mature December 16,
2010. Swing line borrowings are limited to $15 million, with swing line borrowings for Libbey
Europe B.V. being limited to 7.5 million. Swing line U.S. dollar borrowings bear interest
calculated at the prime rate plus the Applicable Rate for ABR (Alternate Base Rate) Loans, and
euro-denominated swing line borrowings (Eurocurrency Loans) bear interest calculated at the
Netherlands swing line rate, as defined in the ABL Facility. The Applicable Rates for ABR Loans and
Eurocurrency Loans vary depending on our aggregate remaining availability. The Applicable Rates for
ABR Loans and Eurocurrency Loans were 0 percent and 1.75 percent, respectively, at September 30,
2006. There were no Libbey Glass borrowings under the facility, while Libbey Europe B.V. had
outstanding borrowings of 41.0 million at September 30, 2006. Interest with respect to the ABL
facility is payable monthly.
All borrowings under the ABL Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in (i)
substantially all assets of (a) Libbey Glass and (b) substantially all of Libbey Glasss present
and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, (ii) (a) 100 percent of the stock of Libbey
Glass, (b) 100 percent of the stock of substantially all of Libbey Glasss present and future
direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, (c) 100 percent of the non-voting stock of substantially
all of Libbey Glasss first-tier present and future foreign subsidiaries and (d) 65 percent of the
voting stock of substantially all of Libbey Glasss first-tier present and future foreign
subsidiaries, and (iii) substantially all proceeds and products of the property and assets
described in clauses (i) and (ii) of this sentence. Additionally, borrowings by Libbey Europe under
the ABL Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in (i) substantially all of the
assets of Libbey Europe, the parent of Libbey Europe and certain of its subsidiaries, (ii) 100
percent of the stock of Libbey Europe and certain subsidiaries of Libbey Europe, and (iii)
substantially all proceeds and products of the property and assets described in clauses (i) and
(ii) of this sentence.
We pay a Commitment Fee, as defined by the ABL Facility, on the total credit provided under the
Facility. The Commitment Fee varies depending on our aggregate availability. The Commitment Fee was
0.25 percent at September 30, 2006. No compensating balances are required by the Agreement. The
Agreement does not require compliance with restrictive financial covenants, unless aggregate unused
availability falls below $25 million.
The borrowing base under the ABL Facility is determined by a monthly analysis of the eligible
accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets. The borrowing base is the sum of (a) 85% of
eligible accounts receivable, (b) the lesser of (i) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value (NOLV)
of eligible inventory, (ii) 65% of eligible inventory, or (iii) $75 million and (c) the lesser of
$25 million and the aggregate of (i) 75% of the NOLV of eligible equipment and (ii) 50% of the fair
market value of eligible real property.
14
Offsetting the total borrowing base are real estate and ERISA reserves totaling $13 million and
mark-to-market reserves for natural gas and interest rate swaps of $2.9 million. The ABL Facility
also provides for the issuance of $30 million of letters of credit, which are applied against the
$150 million limit. At September 30, 2006, we had $8.4 million in letters of credit outstanding
under the Facility. Remaining unused availability on the ABL Facility was $36.7 million at
September 30, 2006.
Senior Notes
Libbey Glass and Libbey Inc. entered into a purchase agreement pursuant to which Libbey Glass
agreed to sell $306 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior secured notes due
2011 (Senior Notes) to the initial purchasers named in a private placement. The net proceeds, after
deducting a discount and the estimated expenses and fees, were approximately $290.1 million. The
Senior Notes bear interest at a rate equal to six-month LIBOR plus 7.0 percent and were offered at
a discount of 2 percent of face value. Interest with respect to the Senior Notes is payable
semiannually on June 1 and December 1. The interest rate was 12.44 percent at September 30, 2006.
We have Interest Rate Protection Agreements (Rate Agreements) with respect to $200 million of debt
as a means to manage our exposure to fluctuating interest rates. The Rate Agreements effectively
convert this portion of our long-term borrowings from variable rate debt to fixed-rate debt, thus
reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future income. The fixed interest rate for our
borrowings related to the Rate Agreements at September 30, 2006, excluding applicable fees, is
5.24 percent per year and the total interest rate, including
applicable fees, is 12.24 percent per year. The
average maturity of these Rate Agreements is 3.4 years at September 30, 2006. Total remaining
Senior notes not covered by the Rate Agreements has fluctuating interest rates with a weighted
average rate of 12.44 percent per year at September 30, 2006. If the counterparties to these Rate
Agreements were to fail to perform, we would no longer be protected from interest rate fluctuations
by these Rate Agreements. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.
The fair market value for the Rate Agreements at September 30, 2006, was $(1.7) million. The fair
value of the Rate Agreements is based on the market standard methodology of netting the discounted
expected future variable cash receipts and the discounted future fixed cash payments. The variable
cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market
interest rate forward curves. We do not expect to cancel these agreements and expect them to
expire as originally contracted.
The Senior Notes are guaranteed by Libbey Inc. and all of Libbey Glasss existing and future
domestic subsidiaries that guarantee any of Libbey Glasss debt or debt of any subsidiary guarantor
(see footnote 14). The Senior Notes and related guarantees will have the benefit of a
second-priority lien, subject to permitted liens, on collateral consisting of substantially all the
tangible and intangible assets of Libbey Glass and its domestic subsidiary guarantors that secure
all of the indebtedness under Libbey Glasss new ABL Facility. The Collateral will not include the
assets of non-guarantor subsidiaries that will secure the ABL Facility.
PIK Notes
Concurrently with the execution of the purchase agreement with respect to the Senior Notes, Libbey
Glass and Libbey Inc. entered into a purchase agreement (Unit Purchase Agreement) pursuant to which
Libbey Glass agreed to sell units consisting of $102 million aggregate principal amount 16 percent
senior subordinated secured pay-in-kind notes due 2011 (PIK Notes) and Libbey Inc. issued
detachable warrants to purchase 485,309 shares of Libbey Inc. common stock (Warrants), to a
purchaser named in a private placement. The net proceeds, after deducting a discount and estimated
expenses and fees, were approximately $97.0 million. The proceeds were allocated between warrants
and the underlying debt based on their respective fair values at the time of issuance. The amount
allocated to the warrants has been recorded in equity, with the offset recorded as a discount on
the underlying debt. The PIK Notes bear interest at a rate of 16 percent, and were offered at a
discount of 2 percent of face value. Interest is payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1, but
during the first three years, interest is payable by issuance of additional PIK Notes. Each Warrant
is exercisable at $11.25.
The obligations of Libbey Glass under the PIK Notes are guaranteed by Libbey Inc. and all of Libbey
Glasss existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee any of Libbey Glasss debt or debt
of any subsidiary guarantor (see footnote 14). The PIK Notes and related guarantees are senior
subordinated obligations of Libbey Glass and the guarantors of the PIK Notes and are entitled to
the benefit of a third-priority lien, subject to permitted liens, on the collateral that secures
the Senior Notes.
Promissory Note
In September 2001, we issued a $2.7 million promissory note in connection with the purchase of our
Laredo, Texas warehouse facility. At September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, we had $2.0 million
and $2.1 million, respectively, outstanding on the promissory note. Interest with respect to the
promissory note is paid monthly.
15
Note Payable
We have an overdraft line of credit for a maximum of 1.75 million. The $0.4 million outstanding
at September 30, 2006, was the U.S. dollar equivalent under the euro-based overdraft line and the
interest rate was 3.14 percent. Interest with respect to the note payable is paid monthly.
RMB Loan Contract
On January 23, 2006, Libbey Glassware (China) Co., Ltd. (Libbey China), an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of Libbey Inc., entered into an RMB Loan Contract (Loan Contract) with China
Construction Bank Corporation Langfang Economic Development Area Sub-Branch (CCB). Pursuant to the
Loan Contract, CCB agreed to lend to Libbey China RMB 250 million, or the equivalent of
approximately $31 million, for the construction of our production facility in China and the
purchase of related equipment, materials and services. The loan has a term of eight years and bears
interest at a variable rate as announced by the Peoples Bank of China. As of the date of the
initial advance under the Loan Contract, the annual interest rate was 5.51 percent, and as of
September 30, 2006, the annual interest rate was 5.75 percent. As of September 30, 2006, the
outstanding balance was RMB 220 million (approximately $27.9 million). Interest is payable
quarterly. Payments of principal in the amount of RMB 30 million (approximately $3.8 million) and
RMB 40 million (approximately $5.0 million) must be made on July 20, 2012, and December 20, 2012,
respectively, and three payments of principal in the amount of RMB 60 million (approximately $7.5
million) each must be made on July 20, 2013, December 20, 2013, and January 20, 2014, respectively.
The obligations of Libbey China are secured by a guarantee executed by Libbey Inc. for the benefit
of CCB. Interest with respect to the RMB loan contract is paid monthly.
Obligations Under Capital Leases
We lease certain machinery and equipment under agreements that are classified as capital leases.
These leases were assumed in the Crisal acquisition. The cost of the equipment under capital leases
is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as property, plant and equipment and the
related depreciation expense is included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The future minimum lease payments required under the capital leases as of September 30, 2006, are
as follows:
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2-3 |
|
4-5 |
|
|
Total |
|
Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Capital leases |
|
$ |
1,644 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Other Debt
The other debt of $1.9 million primarily consists of governmental subsidized loans for equipment
purchases at Crisal.
16
6. Special Charges
Capacity Realignment
In August 2004, we announced that we were realigning our production capacity in order to improve
our cost structure. In mid-February 2005, we ceased operations at our manufacturing facility in
City of Industry, California, and realigned production among our other domestic glass manufacturing
facilities. See Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for further discussion.
As a result, we recorded the following special charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset related |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
Employee termination costs & other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in special charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following reflects the balance sheet activity related to the capacity realignment for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Cash |
|
Balance at |
|
Cash |
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
payments |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
payments |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Land sale gain |
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
$ |
(674 |
) |
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
373 |
|
Employee termination costs & other |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
Balance sheet classification is as follows: $0.42 million is included in the line item special
charges reserve on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Salaried Workforce Reduction Program
In the second quarter of 2005, we announced a ten percent reduction of our North American salaried
workforce, or approximately 70 employees, in order to reduce our overall costs. See Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005, for further discussion.
As a result, we recorded the following special charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Pension & retiree welfare (included in Cost of Sales) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
Pension & retiree welfare (included in Selling, general
and administrative expenses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Employee termination costs & other (included in Special
Charges) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax salary reduction program |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following reflects the balance sheet activity related to the salaried workforce reduction
program for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cash |
|
June 30, |
|
Cash |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
payments |
|
2006 |
|
payments |
|
2006 |
|
Employee termination costs |
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
$ |
(409 |
) |
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
877 |
|
|
$ |
(409 |
) |
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
The employee termination costs of $0.41 million are included in the special charges reserve on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
17
Crisa Restructuring
In June 2006, Libbey announced plans to consolidate Crisas two principal manufacturing facilities
into one facility and to discontinue certain product lines in order to reduce fixed costs. As part
of the consolidation plan, a $2.7 million severance reserve was established related to statutory
severance obligations for approximately 600 employees.
As a result, we recorded the following special charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset related (included in Special Charges) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,587 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Inventory write-down (included in Cost of Sales) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crisa restructuring |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,130 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following reflects the balance sheet activity related to the Crisa restructuring for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Cash |
|
Non-cash |
|
Balance at |
|
Non-cash |
|
Cash |
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
payments |
|
utilization |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
utilization |
|
payments |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Employee termination costs & other |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,684 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,684 |
|
|
The employee termination costs and other of $2.7 million are included in the special charges
reserve on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Write-off of Finance Fees
In June 2006, Libbey wrote off unamortized finance fees related to debt of Libbey and Crisa that
was refinanced.
As a result, we recorded the following special charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Write-off of finance fees |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in interest expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Special Charges
The following table summarizes the charges related to the capacity realignment, salary workforce
reduction program, Crisa restructuring and write-off of finance fees and their classifications on
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total special charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,036 |
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following reflects the balance sheet activity with respect to the charges related to the
capacity realignment, salary workforce reduction program, Crisa restructuring and write-off of
finance fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Cash |
|
Non-cash |
|
June 30, |
|
Non-cash |
|
Cash |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
payments |
|
utilization |
|
2006 |
|
utilization |
|
payments |
|
2006 |
|
Land sale gain |
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
$ |
(674 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
373 |
|
Employee termination costs & other |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
Total special charges reserve |
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
(1,111 |
) |
|
$ |
2,617 |
|
|
$ |
3,508 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
3,509 |
|
|
18
7. Pension
We have pension plans covering the majority of our employees. Benefits generally are based on
compensation and length of service for salaried employees and job grade and length of service for
hourly employees. Excluding Crisa, our policy is to fund pension plans such that sufficient assets
will be available to meet future benefit requirements for all members of the funded plans. Crisa,
in Mexico, has an unfunded pension plan under which benefits will be funded as current amounts
become due. In addition, we have a supplemental employee retirement plan (SERP) covering certain
employees. The U.S. pension plans, including the SERP, which is an unfunded liability, cover
salaried and non-union hourly (hired before January 1, 2006) and hourly U.S.-based employees of
Libbey. The non-U.S. pension plans cover the employees of our wholly owned subsidiaries Royal
Leerdam and Leerdam Crystal in the Netherlands and Crisa in Mexico.
Effect on Operations
The components of our net pension expense (credit), including the SERP, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
Total |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,231 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
1,644 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
3,982 |
|
|
|
3,950 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4,037 |
) |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
|
|
(4,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Gain |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
expense (credit) |
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
2,037 |
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
3,091 |
|
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
Total |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,497 |
|
|
$ |
4,897 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
5,287 |
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
10,680 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
11,797 |
|
|
|
11,898 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(11,799 |
) |
|
|
(12,781 |
) |
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
(13,494 |
) |
|
|
(14,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
Gain |
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,614 |
|
Settlement |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension expense (credit) |
|
$ |
8,542 |
|
|
$ |
8,001 |
|
|
$ |
678 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
9,220 |
|
|
$ |
7,995 |
|
|
In the third quarter of 2006, we incurred a pension settlement charge of $1.0 million as a result
of projected excess lump sum distributions to be taken by employees retiring during 2006.
In the second quarter of 2005, we incurred a pension curtailment charge of $1.6 million as a result
of a planned reduction in our North American salaried workforce of approximately 70 employees. Due
to the reduction of the salaried workforce, the U.S. pension plans were revalued as of June 30,
2005. At that time, the discount rate was reduced from 5.75 percent to 5.00 percent. This
revaluation resulted in additional net periodic benefit cost of $0.2 million in the second quarter
of 2005, which is included in the above table. The normal measurement date of the U.S. and non-U.S.
plans is December 31. The salary reduction plan is explained in further detail in Note 6.
With the purchase of the remaining 51 percent of Crisa (See Note 4), we assumed the pension
liability of only the active employees of Crisa as of that date. Vitro assumed all pension
liabilities with respect to retirees as of June 16, 2006. Crisa maintains an unfunded pension plan
for its employees. The estimated amount of the unfunded liability for active employees as of the
closing date was $12.9 million. The amount of expense included for the third quarter is $0.8
million.
19
We expect to contribute approximately $0.7 million to our U.S. pension plans and approximately $1.5
million to our plan in the Netherlands in 2006. Through the third quarter of 2006, there have been
contributions of approximately $0.3 million to the U.S. plans and contributions of approximately
$1.1 million for the plan in the Netherlands.
We have determined that the recently enacted Pension Protection Act of 2006 is expected to
favorably impact projected 2007 cash flow by approximately $17 million.
On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS 158), which amends SFAS 87 and SFAS 106 to require
recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of pension and other postretirement benefit
plans on the balance sheet. Under SFAS 158, gains and losses, prior service costs and credits, and
any remaining transition amounts under SFAS 87 and SFAS 106 that have not yet been recognized
through net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net
of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic cost. SFAS 158 is
effective for publicly-held companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. Libbey will
adopt the balance sheet recognition provisions of SFAS 158 at December 31, 2006. The adoption of
FAS 158 is expected to reduce Libbeys stockholders equity at December 31, 2006 by approximately
$20-25 million pre-tax. The Statement does not affect the results of operations.
8. Nonpension Postretirement Benefits
We provide certain retiree health care and life insurance benefits covering a majority of our
salaried and non-union hourly (hired before January 1, 2004) and union hourly employees in the U.S.
and Canada. Employees are generally eligible for benefits upon retirement and completion of a
specified number of years of creditable service. Benefits for most hourly retirees are determined
by collective bargaining. The U.S. nonpension postretirement plans cover the hourly and salaried
U.S.-based employees of Libbey. The non-U.S. nonpension postretirement plans cover the retirees and
active employees of Libbey who are located in Canada. Under a cross-indemnity agreement,
Owens-Illinois, Inc. assumed liability for the nonpension postretirement benefits of Libbey
retirees who had retired as of June 24, 1993.
Effect on Operations
The provision for our nonpension postretirement benefit expense consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
Total |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Gain (loss) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonpension
postretirement benefit expense (credit) |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
(44 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
Total |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
Gain (loss) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonpension postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
1,817 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
1,490 |
|
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
|
In the second quarter of 2005, we incurred a nonpension postretirement curtailment charge of $0.3
million as a result of a planned reduction in our North American salaried workforce of
approximately 70 employees. Due to the reduction of the salaried workforce, the
20
U.S. postretirement plans were revalued as of June 30, 2005. At that time, the discount rate was
reduced from 5.75 percent to 5.00 percent. This revaluation resulted in additional net periodic
benefit cost of $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2005. The normal measurement date of the U.S.
and non-U.S. plans is December 31. The salary reduction plan is explained in further detail in Note
6.
9. Net Income per Share of Common Stock
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Numerator for
earnings per share -
net (loss) earnings
that is available to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
Denominator for basic
earnings per share
weighted-average
shares outstanding |
|
|
14,254,121 |
|
|
|
13,947,861 |
|
|
|
|
14,139,206 |
|
|
|
13,878,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive
securities employee
stock options,
employee stock
purchase plan (ESPP)
and warrants (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for
diluted earnings per
share adjusted
weighted-average
shares and assumed
conversions |
|
|
14,254,121 |
|
|
|
13,950,641 |
|
|
|
|
14,139,206 |
|
|
|
13,879,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The effect of the employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) of 6,537 shares for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006, was anti-dilutive. The effect of the ESPP of 1,504 shares for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 was anti-dilutive. These anti-dilutive shares were
not included in the earnings per share calculations due to the net losses reported. All other
employee stock options and warrants were excluded from the diluted weighted average shares
calculations as they were not in-the-money as of September 30, 2006. |
Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive impact of employee stock options, the employee
stock purchase plan (ESPP) and warrants, which are calculated based on the average share price for
each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the
tax-effected proceeds that would be hypothetically received from the exercise of all in-the-money
options are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.
10. Employee Stock Benefit Plans
We have three stock-based employee compensation plans. We also have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) under which eligible employees may purchase a limited number of shares of Libbey Inc.
common stock at a discount. We also have issued restricted shares in the past. Restricted shares
are issued at no cost to the recipient of the award. The market value of the restricted shares is
charged to income ratably over the period during which these awards vest.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based awards under the intrinsic value
method of Accounting Principles Board (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
No. 25). This method under APB No. 25 resulted in no expense being recorded for stock option grants
for which the exercise price was equal to the fair value of the underlying stock on the date of
grant, which had been the situation for all years prior to 2006. On January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) SFAS No. 123-R. SFAS No. 123-R requires that
compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial
statements. Share-based compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity
or liability instruments issued. SFAS No. 123-R applies to all of our outstanding unvested
share-based payment awards as of January 1, 2006, and all prospective awards using the modified
prospective transition method without restatement of prior periods.
On December 6, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors, acting as the Compensation Committee of the
whole, accelerated the vesting of all outstanding and unvested nonqualified stock options granted
through 2004 under the Companys 1999 Equity Participation Plan and Amended and Restated 1999
Equity Participation Plan. As a result, options to purchase 258,731 shares of the Companys common
stock became exercisable on December 6, 2005. Of that amount, options that were granted through
2004 to the Companys named executive officers became immediately exercisable. In the case of each
of the stock options in question, the exercise price greatly exceeded the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on December 6, 2005. The decision to accelerate vesting of these options was
made primarily to avoid recognition of compensation expense related to these underwater stock
options in financial statements relating to future fiscal periods. By accelerating these underwater
stock options, the Company estimates a reduction the stock option expense it otherwise would have
been required to record by approximately $0.3 million in 2006,
$0.1 milliion in 2007 and $0.03 million in 2008 on
an after-tax basis.
21
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
We have an ESPP under which 650,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance.
Eligible employees may purchase a limited number of shares of common stock at a discount of up to
15 percent of the market value at certain plan-defined dates. The ESPP terminates on May 31, 2012.
At December 31, 2005, 470,062 shares were available for issuance under the ESPP. At September 30,
2006, 474,900 shares were available for issuance under the ESPP. Starting in 2003, repurchased
common stock is being used to fund the ESPP. A participant may elect to have payroll deductions
made during the offering period in an amount not less than 2 percent and not more than 20 percent
of the participants compensation during the option period. The option period starts on the
offering date (June 1st) and ends on the exercise date (May 31st). In no event may the option price
per share be less than the par value per share ($.01) of common stock. All options and rights to
participate in the ESPP are nontransferable and subject to forfeiture in accordance with the ESPP
guidelines. In the event of certain corporate transactions, each option outstanding under the ESPP
will be assumed or the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of such successor
corporation will substitute an equivalent option.
No ESPP awards were granted during the three months ending September 30, 2006, as ESPP grants
generally occur annually on May 31st.
Equity Participation Plan Program Description
We have three equity participation plans: (1) the Libbey Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan for Key Employees, (2) the Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Participation Plan of Libbey Inc.
and (3) the Libbey Inc. 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Although options previously granted under the
Libbey Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and the Amended and Restated
1999 Equity Participation Plan of Libbey Inc. remain outstanding, no further grants of equity-based
compensation may be made under those plans. However, up to a total of 1,500,000 shares of Libbey
Inc. common stock are available for issuance as equity-based compensation under the Libbey Inc.
2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Under the Libbey Inc. 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, grants of
equity-based compensation may take the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
performance shares or units, restricted stock or restricted stock units or other stock-based
awards. Employees and directors are eligible for awards under this plan. There were no stock
options or other equity-based awards granted in the third quarter of 2006. All option grants have
an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the grant date. The
vesting period of options outstanding as of September 30, 2006, is generally four (4) years. Stock
options are amortized over the vesting period using the FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for
Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans, an interpretation of APB
Opinions No. 15 and 25 (FIN 28) expense attribution methodology.
Prior Year Pro forma Information
With the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R on January 1, 2006, compensation expense for stock options is
recorded based on the estimated fair value of the stock options using an option-pricing model.
Compensation expense continues to be recorded for restricted stock grants over their vesting
periods based on fair value, which is equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of
grant. The estimated annual impact of applying the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R is an after-tax
charge of $0.5 million for 2006.
22
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied
the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123), to stock-based employee compensation. The table below shows the effect on our net
loss and loss per share for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
Reported net income: |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
Less: Stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value-based method for
all awards, net of related tax
effects |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of
related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
3,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
Basic income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Pro forma basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
Diluted income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Pro forma diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
General Stock Option Information
Stock option compensation expense of $0.4 million is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for share-based payment transactions is immaterial for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the value of traded
options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. There were no stock option
grants made during the three months ended September 30, 2006. Under the Black-Scholes option
pricing model, the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 is $3.31. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant
with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in the three months ended and nine
months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Stock option grants: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
4.29 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
38.56 |
% |
|
|
34.6 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve at the time of grant and has a term equal to the expected
life. The rate for the period within the contractual life of the
option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
grant date. |
|
|
|
The expected term represents the period of time the options are
expected to be outstanding and is based on historical trends.
Additionally, we use historical data to estimate option exercises
and employee forfeitures. We review the actual and estimated
forfeitures on an annual basis and record an adjustment, if
necessary. Employees expected exercises and post-vesting
employment termination behavior was also incorporated into the
fair value of an option. We project the expected life of our stock
options based upon historical and other economic data trended into
future years. The Company uses the Simplified Method defined by
the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment
(SAB 107), to estimate the expected term of the option,
representing the period of time that options granted are expected
to be outstanding. |
|
|
|
The expected volatility was developed considering our historical
experience. The range of expected volatilities used is 33.34
percent to 38.56 percent, and the average expected volatility is
34.55 percent. We use projected data for expected volatility of
our stock options based on the average of daily, weekly and
monthly historical volatilities of our stock price over the
expected life of the option and other economic data trended into
future years. |
23
|
|
The dividend yield is calculated as the ratio based on our most
recent historical dividend payments per share of common stock at
the grant date to the stock price on the date of grant. |
There were no significant modifications that occurred during the third quarter of 2006. In order to
fulfill exercises of stock options, we issue the shares from treasury stock . We currently have a
sufficient number of treasury shares on hand to fund equity-based awards under the Libbey Inc. 2006
Omnibus Incentive Plan and to fund purchases under the ESPP in future offering periods.
Information with respect to our stock options at September 30, 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise price (per |
|
remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
share) |
|
contractual life |
|
Value |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,555,556 |
|
|
$ |
28.04 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
(47,900 |
) |
|
|
31.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,517,656 |
|
|
$ |
27.81 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,236,356 |
|
|
$ |
30.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise price (per |
|
remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
share) |
|
contractual life |
|
Value |
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,517,656 |
|
|
$ |
27.81 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
(7,050 |
) |
|
|
22.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,510,606 |
|
|
$ |
27.38 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,355,946 |
|
|
$ |
29.17 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise price (per |
|
remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
share) |
|
contractual life |
|
Value |
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,510,606 |
|
|
$ |
27.38 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
32.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,508,706 |
|
|
$ |
27.38 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,354,046 |
|
|
$ |
29.17 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Intrinsic value for share-based instruments is defined as the difference between the current market
value and the exercise price. SFAS No. 123-R requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of
the compensation cost recognized for those stock options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as
financing cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For three months ended |
|
For nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash received for options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits realized from tax deductions from options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value,
based on our closing stock price of $11.19 as of September 30, 2006, which would have been received
by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. There are no
in-the-money options exercisable as of September 30, 2006.
24
As of September 30, 2006, $0.4 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to
nonvested stock options are expected to be recognized within the next four years on a
weighted-average basis. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 is $1,146.
The following table summarizes our nonvested stock option activity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Shares |
|
fair value(per share) |
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005: |
|
|
145,260 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
Granted |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
154,960 |
|
|
$ |
3.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Shares |
|
fair value (per share) |
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2006: |
|
|
154,960 |
|
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
3.82 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
154,660 |
|
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Shares |
|
fair value (per share) |
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006: |
|
|
154,660 |
|
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
154,660 |
|
|
$ |
3.78 |
|
|
11. Derivatives
As of September 30, 2006, we had Interest Rate Protection Agreements for $200 million of our
variable rate debt, and commodity contracts for 4.59 million British Thermal Units (BTUs) of
natural gas, with a fair value of $(4.4) million, accounted for under Statement No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Statement 133). The fair value of these
derivatives is included in Derivative Liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for the
Interest Rate Protection Agreements and commodity contracts. At September 30, 2005, we had Interest Rate
Protection Agreements for $25.0 million of our variable rate debt and commodity contracts for 2.5
million BTUs of natural gas.
We do not believe we are exposed to more than a nominal amount of credit risk in our interest rate
and natural gas hedges, as the counterparties are established financial institutions.
All of our derivatives qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges (except for 2006 natural gas
contracts at Crisa) at September 30, 2006. Hedge accounting is applied only when the derivative is
deemed to be highly effective at offsetting changes in anticipated cash flows of the hedged item or
transaction. The ineffective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative designated as
a cash flow hedge is recognized in current earnings. In the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, we
recognized a loss of $1.7 million and a gain of $0.5 million, respectively, which represented the
impact of accounting under statement 133 on the statement of
operations.
12. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
Minimum pension liability and intangible pension asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments (see
detail below) |
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
|
(5,683 |
) |
|
|
8,540 |
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuation |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4,365 |
) |
|
$ |
9,997 |
|
|
|
$ |
(18,246 |
) |
|
$ |
9,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
25
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of tax) includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Minimum pension liability and intangible pension assets |
|
$ |
(34,888 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,770 |
) |
Derivatives |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
3,743 |
|
Exchange rate fluctuation |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(37,006 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,121 |
) |
|
The change in other comprehensive income for derivative instruments for the Company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
$ |
(1,762 |
) |
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,203 |
) |
|
$ |
14,719 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax effect |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
(4,569 |
) |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
(6,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income related to derivatives |
|
$ |
(959 |
) |
|
$ |
5,871 |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,683 |
) |
|
$ |
8,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Guarantees
The paragraphs below describe our guarantees, in accordance with Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees
of Indebtedness of Others.
The debt of Libbey Glass and Libbey Europe B.V, pursuant to the ABL Facility, the Senior Notes and
the PIK Notes, is guaranteed by Libbey Inc. and by certain subsidiaries of Libbey Glass. All are
related parties that are included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 5
for further disclosure on debt of Libbey. Pursuant to the indenture agreements that govern the
Senior Notes and the PIK Notes, Libbey Glass is required to provide certain financial information
to holders and to the indenture trustee within fifteen days after the date that Libbey Glass would
be required to file quarterly and annual reports if Libbey Glass were subject to the periodic
reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. Libbey Inc. may fulfill this obligation by filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission consolidating financial statements for (i) Libbey Inc., (ii)
Libbey Glass, (iii) the subsidiaries of Libbey Inc. that
guarantee the Senior Notes and the PIK Notes and (iv) the subsidiaries of Libbey Inc. that do not
guarantee the Senior Notes and the PIK Notes. Libbey Inc. has provided such consolidating
financial statements within the filing of this quarterly report in compliance with the requirements
of the indentures. (See Note 14).
In addition, Libbey Inc. guarantees the payment by Crisa of its obligation to purchase electricity
pursuant to a Power Purchase Agreement to which Crisa is a party. The guarantee is limited to the
lesser of 49 percent of any such obligation of Crisa and $5.0 million. The guarantee was entered
into in October 2000 and continues for 15 years from the initial date of electricity generation,
which commenced on April 12, 2003. In connection with the June 16, 2006 acquisition of the
remaining 51 percent ownership interest in Crisa, (a) we have agreed to execute and deliver a
guarantee pursuant to which we would agree to guarantee to the electricity provider the payment and
performance of 100 percent of Crisas obligations under the Power Purchase Agreement, in exchange
for which the electricity provider would release Vitro from its guarantee of Crisas obligation
under the Power Purchase Agreement; and (b) pending the electricity providers release of Vitro
from its guarantee of Crisas obligations, we will indemnify Vitro for any liability it may incur
if Crisa defaults under the Power Purchase Agreement and the electricity provider seeks recourse
against Vitro under its guarantee of Crisas obligations.
In October 1995, we guaranteed the obligations of Syracuse China Company and Libbey Canada Inc.
under the Asset Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of Syracuse China. The guarantee is limited
to $5.0 million and expires October 10, 2010. The guarantee is in favor of The Pfaltzgraff Co., The
Pfaltzgraff Outlet Co. and Syracuse China Company of Canada Ltd.
In connection with our acquisition of Crisal-Cristalaria Automática, S.A. (Crisal), we agreed to
guarantee the payment, if and when such payment becomes due and payable, by Libbey Europe B.V. of
the Earn-Out Payment, as defined in the Stock Promissory Sale and Purchase Agreement dated January
10, 2005, between Libbey Europe B.V., as purchaser, and VAA-Vista Alegre Atlantis SGPS, SA, as
seller. The obligation of Libbey Europe B.V., and ultimately Libbey Inc., to pay the Earn-Out
Payment (which is equal to 5.5 million euros) is contingent upon Crisal achieving certain targets
relating to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and net sales. In no
event will the Earn-Out Payment be due prior to the third anniversary of the closing date, which
was January 10, 2005. (See Note 16).
On March 30, 2005, we entered into a Guarantee pursuant to which we guaranteed to BP Energy Company
the obligation of Libbey Glass
26
to pay for natural gas supplied by BP Energy Company to Libbey
Glass. Libbey Glass currently purchases natural gas from BP Energy Company under an agreement that
expires on December 31, 2006. Our guarantee with respect to purchases by Libbey Glass under that
agreement is limited to $3.0 million, including costs of collection, if any.
On July 29, 2005, we entered into a guarantee for the benefit of FR Caddo Parish, LLC pursuant to
which we guarantee the payment and performance by Libbey Glass of its obligation under an
Industrial Building Sublease Agreement with respect to the development of a new distribution center
in Shreveport, Louisiana. The underlying lease is for a term of 20 years.
On January 23, 2006, we entered into a guarantee for the benefit of China Construction Bank
Corporation Langfang Economic Development Area Sub-Branch (CCB) pursuant to which we guarantee the
payment by Libbey China of its obligation under an RMB Loan Contract entered into in connection
with the construction of our production facility in China.
In connection with the June 16, 2006 acquisition of the remaining 51 percent ownership interest in
Crisa and the concurrent assignment by Vitro to Crisa of a lease with respect to real estate
located in Monterrey, Mexico, we executed a guarantee, in favor of Fondo Stiva, S.A. de C.V.
(Fondo Stiva, as Lessor), pursuant to which we guarantee the payment and performance by Crisa
Libbey Comercial, S. de R.L. de C.V., formerly Vitrocrisa Comercial, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Crisa
Comercial, as Lessee), pursuant to the lease agreement dated February 17, 2004 between Fondo Stiva
and Crisa Comercial (the Warehouse Lease), and of Crisa Libbey, S. de R.L. de C.V., formerly
Vitrocrisa, S. de R.L. de C.V. (Crisa Libbey), pursuant to a deed under which Crisa Libbey
granted to Fondo Stiva surface use rights with respect to the real estate and a mortgage lien to
secure Crisa Comercials obligations under the Warehouse Lease.
In addition, on June 16, 2006, we entered into a guarantee pursuant to which we agreed to guarantee
to Vitro the payment and performance by Crisa Comercial of its obligations under the Warehouse
Lease in the event that Fondo Stiva demands payment from Vitro pursuant to Vitros guarantee,
executed in favor of Fondo Stiva, of Crisa Comercials obligations under the Warehouse Lease.
14. Condensed Consolidated Guarantor Financial Statements
Libbey Glass is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Libbey Inc. and the issuer of the Senior Notes
and the PIK Notes. The obligations of Libbey Glass under the Senior Notes and the PIK Notes are
fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by Libbey Inc. and by certain
indirect, wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of Libbey Inc, as described below. All are related
parties that are included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2006.
At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, Libbey Inc.s indirect, wholly owned domestic
subsidiaries were Syracuse China Company, World Tableware Inc., LGA4 Corp., LGA3 Corp., The
Drummond Glass Company, LGC Corp., Traex Company, Libbey.com LLC, LGFS Inc. and LGAC LLC (together
with Crisa Industrial LLC, which became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Libbey Inc. on June
16, 2006, the Subsidiary Guarantors). The following tables contain condensed consolidating financial
statements of (a) the parent, Libbey Inc., (b) the issuer, Libbey Glass, (c) the Subsidiary
Guarantors, (d) the indirect subsidiaries of Libbey Inc. that are not Subsidiary Guarantors
(collectively, Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries), (e) the consolidating elimination entries, and (f)
the consolidated totals.
27
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
91,693 |
|
|
$ |
27,822 |
|
|
$ |
75,698 |
|
|
$ |
(11,957 |
) |
|
$ |
183,256 |
|
Freight billed to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,932 |
|
|
|
28,148 |
|
|
|
76,137 |
|
|
|
(11,957 |
) |
|
|
184,260 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,064 |
|
|
|
24,340 |
|
|
|
67,175 |
|
|
|
(11,887 |
) |
|
|
152,692 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,868 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
8,962 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
31,568 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,321 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
5,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,729 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
10,839 |
|
|
Equity earnings (loss)
pretax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) before interest
and income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,147 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
9,106 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,459 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,551 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,312 |
) |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
1,116 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(6,445 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,758 |
) |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(3,116 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) before
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,554 |
) |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
Minority interest and equity in
net (loss) income of
subsidiaries |
|
|
(3,307 |
) |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents the total special charges included in the above Statement of Operations
(see note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pretax special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
28
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88,624 |
|
|
$ |
25,106 |
|
|
$ |
23,109 |
|
|
$ |
(1,266 |
) |
|
$ |
135,573 |
|
Freight billed to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,773 |
|
|
|
25,392 |
|
|
|
23,118 |
|
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
136,017 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,703 |
|
|
|
22,567 |
|
|
|
17,725 |
|
|
|
(1,245 |
) |
|
|
108,750 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,070 |
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
5,393 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
27,267 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,542 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,788 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
9,992 |
|
Equity earnings (loss) pretax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
Other (expense) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before interest
and income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,035 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
9,732 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
6,334 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
Net income (loss) before
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
4,244 |
|
Minority interest and equity in
net income (loss) of
subsidiaries |
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(4,511 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,524 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents the total special charges included in the above Statement of Operations
(see note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
Total pretax special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
29
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
274,123 |
|
|
$ |
83,381 |
|
|
$ |
133,832 |
|
|
$ |
(15,216 |
) |
|
$ |
476,120 |
|
Freight billed to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,670 |
|
|
|
84,398 |
|
|
|
134,655 |
|
|
|
(15,216 |
) |
|
|
478,507 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,126 |
|
|
|
72,916 |
|
|
|
117,795 |
|
|
|
(15,216 |
) |
|
|
396,621 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,544 |
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
16,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,886 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,328 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
12,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,511 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,216 |
|
|
|
6,355 |
|
|
|
(7,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,788 |
|
Equity earnings (loss)
pretax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
Other (expense) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(2,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,244 |
) |
|
Earnings (loss) before interest
and income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,063 |
|
|
|
7,172 |
|
|
|
(8,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,530 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,802 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
4,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,360 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,739 |
) |
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
(12,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,830 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,221 |
) |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
(4,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,535 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) before
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,518 |
) |
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
(7,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,295 |
) |
Minority interest and equity in
net (loss) income of
subsidiaries |
|
|
(12,361 |
) |
|
|
(3,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
16,204 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
(8,010 |
) |
|
$ |
16,204 |
|
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents the total special charges included in the above Statement of Operations
(see note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
Total pretax special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,490 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,546 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,036 |
|
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,422 |
|
|
30
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
260,707 |
|
|
$ |
80,751 |
|
|
$ |
70,188 |
|
|
$ |
(1,751 |
) |
|
$ |
409,895 |
|
Freight billed to customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,146 |
|
|
|
81,703 |
|
|
|
70,219 |
|
|
|
(1,751 |
) |
|
|
411,317 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,471 |
|
|
|
66,918 |
|
|
|
59,317 |
|
|
|
(1,751 |
) |
|
|
335,955 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,675 |
|
|
|
14,785 |
|
|
|
10,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,362 |
|
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,262 |
|
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,109 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,419 |
|
|
|
7,583 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,572 |
|
Equity earnings (loss) pretax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
Other (expense) income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before interest
and income taxes and
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,112 |
|
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income
taxes and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,966 |
) |
|
|
7,840 |
|
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(979 |
) |
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
Net income (loss) before
minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
|
|
5,253 |
|
|
|
(1,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
Minority interest and equity in
net income (loss) of
subsidiaries |
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(5,283 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
5,253 |
|
|
$ |
(1,618 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,283 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents the total special charges included in the above Statement of Operations
(see note 6): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,994 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
Total pretax special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,208 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,169 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,630 |
|
|
31
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Subsidiary |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Guarantors |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,802 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
20,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,804 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,269 |
|
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
50,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,708 |
|
Inventories net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,351 |
|
|
|
32,134 |
|
|
|
73,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,859 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,294 |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
(1,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,604 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,716 |
|
|
|
43,056 |
|
|
|
142,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,975 |
|
Investments in and advances
to subsidiaries |
|
|
104,304 |
|
|
|
335,230 |
|
|
|
288,191 |
|
|
|
154,931 |
|
|
|
(882,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and purchased
intangible assets net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,807 |
|
|
|
16,357 |
|
|
|
153,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,755 |
|
Property, plant and
equipment net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,400 |
|
|
|
20,953 |
|
|
|
184,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,777 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,243 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
11,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,058 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
104,304 |
|
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
371,239 |
|
|
$ |
646,282 |
|
|
$ |
(882,656 |
) |
|
$ |
889,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
|
$ |
42,929 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
73,559 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,237 |
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
|
19,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,817 |
|
Notes payable and long-term
debt due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,635 |
|
|
|
15,407 |
|
|
|
63,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,348 |
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
82,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484,035 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,177 |
|
|
|
8,993 |
|
|
|
35,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,603 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
576,160 |
|
|
|
27,402 |
|
|
|
181,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
104,304 |
|
|
|
74,236 |
|
|
|
343,837 |
|
|
|
464,583 |
|
|
|
(882,656 |
) |
|
|
104,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
104,304 |
|
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
371,239 |
|
|
$ |
646,282 |
|
|
$ |
(882,656 |
) |
|
$ |
889,565 |
|
|
32
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,817 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,242 |
|
Accounts receivable net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,358 |
|
|
|
10,145 |
|
|
|
18,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,042 |
|
Inventories net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,420 |
|
|
|
39,715 |
|
|
|
25,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,572 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,806 |
|
|
|
3,767 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,057 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,401 |
|
|
|
53,927 |
|
|
|
45,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,913 |
|
Investments in and advances
to subsidiaries |
|
|
119,605 |
|
|
|
119,644 |
|
|
|
50,989 |
|
|
|
39,219 |
|
|
|
(252,800 |
) |
|
|
76,657 |
|
Goodwill and purchased
intangible assets net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,540 |
|
|
|
16,195 |
|
|
|
17,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,603 |
|
Property, plant and
equipment net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,711 |
|
|
|
22,963 |
|
|
|
68,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,128 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,772 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,483 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
119,605 |
|
|
$ |
414,068 |
|
|
$ |
144,277 |
|
|
$ |
170,634 |
|
|
$ |
(252,800 |
) |
|
$ |
595,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,329 |
|
|
$ |
4,442 |
|
|
$ |
16,249 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,020 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,327 |
|
|
|
9,452 |
|
|
|
8,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,144 |
|
Notes payable and long-tern
debt due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,771 |
|
|
|
13,894 |
|
|
|
36,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,464 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,379 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
and minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,781 |
|
|
|
6,470 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,336 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,102 |
|
|
|
20,364 |
|
|
|
127,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476,179 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
119,605 |
|
|
|
85,966 |
|
|
|
123,913 |
|
|
|
42,921 |
|
|
|
(252,800 |
) |
|
|
119,605 |
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
119,605 |
|
|
$ |
414,068 |
|
|
$ |
144,277 |
|
|
$ |
170,634 |
|
|
$ |
(252,800 |
) |
|
$ |
595,784 |
|
|
33
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
1,410 |
|
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,671 |
|
Other operating activities |
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(3,126 |
) |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,211 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
4,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,149 |
|
Additions to property, plant
& equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,392 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
(11,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,301 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,034 |
|
|
|
(3,094 |
) |
|
|
(11,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,642 |
|
|
|
(3,625 |
) |
|
|
(22,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,725 |
) |
Net borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,036 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,284 |
) |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
19,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,646 |
|
Exchange effect on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Increase in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,533 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,143 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,269 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
20,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,661 |
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,802 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
20,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,804 |
|
|
34
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
509 |
|
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,524 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
2,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,160 |
|
Other operating activities |
|
|
(4,167 |
) |
|
|
(8,178 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(3,513 |
) |
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
(12,072 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
Additions to property, plant &
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,880 |
) |
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,111 |
) |
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,166 |
) |
Net borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,544 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,931 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,721 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,613 |
|
Exchange effect on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
35
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
Glass |
|
Guarantor |
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
(Issuer) |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
(8,010 |
) |
|
$ |
16,204 |
|
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,399 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
11,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,212 |
|
Other operating activities |
|
|
12,361 |
|
|
|
29,671 |
|
|
|
(7,404 |
) |
|
|
(1,751 |
) |
|
|
(16,204 |
) |
|
|
16,673 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,709 |
|
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
(1,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,524 |
|
Additions to property, plant
& equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,251 |
) |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(22,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,557 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211,449 |
) |
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
134,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,995 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(242,700 |
) |
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
112,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132,552 |
) |
Net borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,666 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,256 |
) |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,254 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,976 |
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
(93,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,412 |
|
Exchange effect on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
Increase in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,985 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
20,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,562 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,802 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
$ |
20,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,804 |
|
|
36
Libbey Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
Libbey |
|
|
Libbey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inc. |
|
|
Glass |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Parent) |
|
|
(Issuer) |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Net Income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
5,253 |
|
|
$ |
(1,618 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,283 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,253 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
7,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,611 |
|
Other operating activities |
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
|
|
(2,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
|
|
(13,720 |
) |
|
|
(5,283 |
) |
|
|
(14,513 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,991 |
|
|
|
7,527 |
|
|
|
(7,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,746 |
|
Additions to property, plant &
equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,826 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(5,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,503 |
) |
Other investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
(28,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,767 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,811 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(34,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,270 |
) |
Net borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,137 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
(7,173 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,615 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used
in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,918 |
|
|
|
(7,173 |
) |
|
|
41,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,522 |
|
Exchange effect on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,902 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,002 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
37
15. Segments
For 2005 and the first two quarters of 2006, we managed our business as one reportable segment,
tableware products. With the acquisition of Crisa and our growing focus on the global market, we
formed three reportable segments from which we derive revenue from external customers. We have
reclassified prior period amounts to conform to the current presentation. The segments are
distinguished as follows:
|
|
|
North American Glassincludes sales of glass tableware from subsidiaries throughout the
United States, Canada and Mexico. |
|
|
|
|
North American Otherincludes sales of ceramic dinnerware; metal tableware, holloware
and serveware; and plastic items for sale primarily in the foodservice, retail and
industrial markets from subsidiaries in the United States. |
|
|
|
|
Internationalincludes worldwide sales of glass tableware from subsidiaries outside the
United States, Canada and Mexico. |
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of the Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We do not have any customers who represent 10% or more of total
sales. We evaluate the performance of our segments based upon sales and Earnings Before Interest
and Taxes and Minority Interest (EBIT). Intersegment sales consummated at arms length and have been eliminated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
131,005 |
|
|
$ |
88,625 |
|
|
$ |
320,669 |
|
|
$ |
260,709 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
27,821 |
|
|
|
25,065 |
|
|
|
83,381 |
|
|
|
80,674 |
|
International |
|
|
28,108 |
|
|
|
22,462 |
|
|
|
77,289 |
|
|
|
70,188 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(3,678 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(5,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
183,256 |
|
|
$ |
135,573 |
|
|
$ |
476,120 |
|
|
$ |
409,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
|
$ |
8,122 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,437 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
6.137 |
|
International |
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
9,106 |
|
|
$ |
9,732 |
|
|
$ |
9,530 |
|
|
$ |
12,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
15,130 |
|
|
$ |
8,920 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
15,130 |
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
North American Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,183 |
) |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
(1,381 |
) |
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,183 |
) |
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
|
$ |
(1,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
7,219 |
|
|
$ |
4,183 |
|
|
$ |
17,005 |
|
|
$ |
13,457 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
International |
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
|
|
8,389 |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
10,671 |
|
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
|
$ |
27,212 |
|
|
$ |
25,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
8,637 |
|
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
|
$ |
21,426 |
|
|
$ |
13,740 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
International |
|
|
11,541 |
|
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
32,750 |
|
|
|
11,216 |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
20,301 |
|
|
$ |
7,389 |
|
|
$ |
54,557 |
|
|
$ |
26,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
900,000 |
|
|
$ |
443,663 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,152 |
|
|
|
168,375 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,761 |
|
|
|
203,884 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(795,348 |
) |
|
|
(167,452 |
) |
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
889,565 |
|
|
$ |
648,470 |
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Reconciliation of EBIT to Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment EBIT |
|
|
9,106 |
|
|
|
9,732 |
|
|
|
9,530 |
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
15,551 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
29,360 |
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
(3,116 |
) |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
(7,535 |
) |
|
|
860 |
|
Minority Interest |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
16. Subsequent Event
On October 13, 2006, we settled certain disputes with Allegre Altantis SGPS, SA (VAA) by entering
into an agreement pursuant to which VAA transferred to Libbey Europe B.V., for 1 euro, the
remaining 5 percent of Crisal that we did not acquire in January 2005. VAA also agreed to waive an
earn out payment of 5.5 million euros. We expect to experience a cost savings of 7.5 million
euros, 2.0 million euros for the remaining 5 percent of Crisal and 5.5 million euros for the earn
out payment, with this agreement.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should
be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes
thereto appearing elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of many factors. These factors are discussed in Other
Information in the section Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Overview
In June 2006, the Companys wholly owned subsidiary Libbey Glass closed a private offering of $306
million aggregate principal amount of floating rate senior secured notes due 2011 and a private
offering of units consisting of $102 million aggregate principal amount 16 percent senior
subordinated secured pay-in-kind notes due 2011. Concurrently, Libbey Inc. issued detachable
warrants to purchase 485,309 shares of Libbey Inc. common stock at an exercise price of $11.25 per
share. Concurrently, Libbey Glass entered into a new $150 million senior secured credit facility.
We used the proceeds from these financings to purchase the remaining 51 percent equity interest in
Crisa located in Monterrey, Mexico, bringing our ownership in Crisa to 100 percent, to repay
substantially all existing indebtedness of Libbey and Crisa, and to pay related fees, expenses and
redemption premiums.
The purchase price of the remaining 51 percent of Crisa was $84 million, including acquisition
costs. In addition, we refinanced approximately $71.9 million of Crisas existing indebtedness.
Crisas results of operations are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements starting June
16, 2006. Prior to June 16, 2006, 49 percent of Crisas earnings were accounted for under the
equity method.
Results of Operations Third Quarter 2006 Compared with Third Quarter 2005
Dollars in thousands, except percentages and per-share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
in dollars |
|
in percent |
Net sales |
|
$ |
183,256 |
|
|
$ |
135,573 |
|
|
$ |
47,683 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
31,568 |
|
|
$ |
27,267 |
|
|
$ |
4,301 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Gross profit margin |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations (IFO) |
|
$ |
10,839 |
|
|
$ |
9,992 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
IFO margin |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT)(1)(2) |
|
$ |
9,128 |
|
|
$ |
9,655 |
|
|
$ |
(527 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
EBIT margin |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)(1)(2) |
|
$ |
20,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
EBITDA margin |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
$ |
(7,474 |
) |
|
|
(179.4 |
)% |
Net income margin |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
(.53 |
) |
|
|
(176.7 |
)% |
|
39
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We believe that Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and Earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), non-GAAP financial measures, are useful
metrics for evaluating our financial performance because they provide a more complete
understanding of the underlying results of our core business. See Table 1 for a
reconciliation of loss before income taxes to EBIT and EBITDA. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes pre-tax special charges of $0.5 million related to capacity realignment due to the
closure of our City of Industry facility (See Note 6). |
Net Sales
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, net sales increased 35.2 percent to $183.3 million from
$135.6 million in the year-ago quarter. Excluding Crisa sales, net sales were up 6.2 percent in
total. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the consolidation of sales of Crisa,
the Companys former joint venture in Mexico, a more than 10 percent increase in net sales to
retail, Royal Leerdam and Crisal glassware customers and World Tableware products, and increases
of more than 3.5 percent in shipments of Traex and Syracuse China products. Shipments to
foodservice glassware customers were down slightly as the installation of a new warehouse
management software system in Toledo resulted in delayed shipments of approximately $3 million of
foodservice glassware.
Gross Profit
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, gross profit increased by $4.3 million, or 15.8 percent,
to $31.6 million, compared to $27.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 17.2 percent, compared
to 20.1 percent in the year-ago quarter. The increase in gross profit is primarily attributable to
the consolidation of Crisa, higher sales and higher production activity. Partially offsetting
these improvements were an unfavorable mix of sales, amounting to $2.5 million of reduced gross
profit, driven by the impact of the implementation of our Toledo warehouse management software on
foodservice sales, the impact of Crisal close-out sales and higher distribution costs of $1.6 million
primarily related to the increased sales and the warehouse management software installation, and
$0.5 million in increased pension and postretirement welfare expenses.
Income From Operations
We recorded income from operations of $10.8 million for the quarter-ended September 30, 2006,
compared to income from operations of $10.0 million for the quarter-ended September 30, 2005.
Income from operations, excluding special charges (see Table 3), was $10.5 million for 2006. As a
percent of sales, income from operations, excluding special charges, was 5.9 percent for the
quarter-ended September 30, 2006, compared to 7.7 percent for the prior year quarter. Factors
contributing to the increase in income from operations, excluding special charges, were higher
gross profit (discussed above) and reduced selling, general and administrative expenses. This
reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses is offset by the consolidation of Crisa
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)
EBIT decreased by $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2006, compared to the year ago quarter. EBIT
as a percentage of net sales decreased to 5.0 percent in the third quarter 2006, compared to 7.1
percent in the year ago quarter. EBIT, excluding special charges (see Table 3) decreased by $1.0
million and was $9.1 million for the quarter, as compared to $10.1 million for the year-ago quarter
(see Table 3). As a percentage of sales, EBIT, excluding special charges, decreased 2.5 percent to
5.0 percent from 7.5 percent in the year-ago quarter. The key contributors to the reduction of
EBIT, excluding special charges, compared to the prior year are the same as those discussed above
under Income From Operations, in addition to an increase of almost $2.2 million in charges related
to accounting under statement 133 for natural gas contracts as
compared to the third quarter 2005. (See Note 11).
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA increased by $1.6 million, or 8.5 percent, for the quarter-ended September 30, 2006,
compared to the year-ago quarter. As a percentage of net sales, EBITDA was 11.0 percent in the
quarter-ended September 30, 2006, compared to 13.7 percent in the prior period. EBITDA, excluding
special charges (see Table 1), increased by $1.1 million, or 5.8 percent, to $20.2 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared to the year-ago quarter. As a percentage of sales,
EBITDA, excluding special charges, was 11.0 percent versus 14.1 percent for the prior year quarter.
The additional EBITDA provided by Crisa was partially offset by increased charges of almost $2.2
million related to accounting under statement 133 for natural gas contracts. (See
Note 11).
40
Net Income
We recorded a net loss of $3.3 million in the third quarter of 2006, compared to net income of $4.2
million in the third quarter of 2005. Net loss as a percentage of net sales was 1.8 percent in the
third quarter of 2006, compared to net income of 3.1 percent in the year-ago quarter. Net loss,
excluding special charges, (see Table 3) was $3.3 million, or 23 cents per share, compared to net
income, excluding special charges, of $4.5 million, or 32 cents per diluted share in the year ago
quarter. A $12.2 million increase in interest expense compared with the year-ago quarter is the
result of the refinancing consummated on June 16, 2006, which resulted in higher debt from the
purchase of Crisa and higher average interest rates. The effective tax rate increased to 48.3
percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 33 percent in the year ago quarter.
This increase was driven by the revised annual effective tax rate of 38 percent as the result of
the Crisa acquisition and new inter-company debt structure put into
place which will provide significant future tax savings.
Diluted Net Income Per Share
Diluted loss per share was $0.23 in the third quarter of 2006, compared with diluted income per
share of $0.30 in the third quarter of 2005. The Company reported diluted earnings per share for
the third quarter of 2005 of $0.32, as detailed in Table 3, and excluding pretax special charges of
$0.5 million relating to the impact of capacity realignment charges associated with the shutdown of
Libbeys City of Industry, California, facility in February 2005. (See Note 6).
Results of Operations First Nine Months 2006 compared with First Nine Months 2005
Dollars in thousands, except percentages and per-share amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2006 (3) |
|
2005 (2) |
|
in dollars |
|
in percent |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
476,120 |
|
|
$ |
409,895 |
|
|
$ |
66,225 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
81,886 |
|
|
$ |
75,362 |
|
|
$ |
6,524 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Gross profit margin |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations (IFO) |
|
$ |
9,788 |
|
|
$ |
12,572 |
|
|
$ |
(2,784 |
) |
|
|
(22.1 |
)% |
IFO margin |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT)(1) |
|
$ |
9,464 |
|
|
$ |
12,748 |
|
|
$ |
(3,284 |
) |
|
|
(25.8 |
)% |
EBIT margin |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA)(1) |
|
$ |
36,512 |
|
|
$ |
38,142 |
|
|
$ |
(1,630 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
EBITDA margin |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
(14,009 |
) |
|
|
(850.1 |
)% |
Net income margin |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net (loss) income per share |
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
|
(825.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We believe that Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and Earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), non-GAAP financial measures, are useful
metrics for evaluating our financial performance because they provide a more complete
understanding of the underlying results of our core business. See Table 1 for a
reconciliation of loss before income taxes to EBIT and EBITDA. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes special charges of $9.9 million related to capacity realignment due to the closure
of our City of Industry facility and the reduction of our North American salaried workforce.
(See Note 6.) |
|
(3) |
|
Includes special charges of $20.0 million related to Crisa restructuring and write-off of
finance fees. (See Note 6.) |
41
Net Sales
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, sales increased 16.2 percent to $476.1 million from
$409.9 million in the year-ago period. Excluding Crisas sales from June 16, 2006 to September 30,
2006, sales increased 4.8 percent compared with the first nine months of 2005. This increase in
sales was attributable to increases of more than 6 percent in shipments to foodservice glassware
customers, retail customers, Traex customers, Royal Leerdam customers, and Crisal customers. Sales
of World Tableware products increased 5 percent as compared to the first nine months of 2005.
Shipments to industrial customers were down almost 7 percent during the first nine months of 2006,
while shipments of Syracuse China products were down slightly.
Gross Profit
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, gross profit increased by $6.5 million, or 8.7
percent, compared to the year-ago period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, gross
profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 17.2 percent, compared to 18.4 percent in the
year-ago period. Gross profit, excluding special charges (see Table 3), was $84.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $76.2 million for the year-ago period (see
Table 3). This represents an increase of 10.8 percent from the year-ago period. As a percentage
net sales, gross profit, excluding special charges, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was 17.7 percent, compared to
18.6 percent for the year-ago period. Contributing to the increase in gross profit, excluding
special charges, were the consolidation of Crisa, higher sales and higher production activity.
Income From Operations
Income from operations was $9.8 million during the first nine months of 2006, as compared to income
from operations of $12.6 million during the year-ago period. Income from operations, excluding
special charges (see Table 3), was $24.9 million for the first nine months of 2006, as compared to
$22.5 million for the year-ago period, representing an increase of $2.5 million or 10.9 percent. As
a percentage of net sales, income from operations, excluding special charges, was 5.2 percent,
compared to 5.5 percent for the year-ago period. Contributing to the increase in income from
operations, excluding special charges, were higher sales and higher production activity. Partially
offsetting these improvements were an unfavorable mix of sales, the impact of Crisal close-out
sales and higher distribution costs of $0.9 million primarily related to the increased sales and
implementation issues of the warehouse management software at our Toledo facility.
Earnings Before Interest and Income Taxes (EBIT)
EBIT decreased by $3.3 million for the first nine months of 2006, compared to the year-ago period.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to 2.0 percent in the first nine months of 2006,
compared to 3.1 percent in the year ago period. EBIT, excluding special charges,(see Table 3), was
$24.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $22.6 million for the
year-ago period. As a percentage of sales, EBIT, excluding special charges, decreased 0.3 percent
to 5.2 percent from 5.5 percent in the year-ago period. The contributors to the improvement in
EBIT, excluding special charges, compared to the prior period are the same as those discussed above
under Income from Operations, in addition to an increase in pretax equity earnings from Crisa of
$3.4 million as compared to the prior-year period. The increased equity earnings were the result of
increased and more profitable sales, higher translation gain, and lower natural gas and electricity
costs. Partially offsetting these improvements was a $3.1 million increase in charges related to
accounting under Statement 133 for natural gas contracts. (See
Note 11).
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization (EBITDA)
EBITDA decreased by $1.6 million, or 4.3 percent, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
compared to the year-ago period. As a percentage of net sales, EBITDA was 7.7 percent in the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, compared to 9.3 percent in the prior year period. For the first
nine months of 2006, EBITDA, excluding special charges (see Table 1), was $51.6 million, a 7.5
percent increase over EBITDA, excluding special charges, of $48.0 million during the first nine
months of 2005. The increase in EBITDA, excluding special charges, is attributable to the factors
described above with respect to EBIT, excluding special charges.
42
Net Income
We reported a net loss of $12.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to
net income of $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Net loss as a percentage
of net sales was 2.6 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared to net income
as a percentage of sales of 0.4 percent for the year-ago period. Net loss increased due to special
charges of $15.1 million pretax relating to the announced consolidation of two recently acquired
Mexican facilities. A $19.1 million increase in interest expense compared with the year-ago period
is the result of the refinancing consummated on June 16, 2006. Contributing to the increase in
interest expense was a write-off of $4.9 million of financing fees associated with debt retired
during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, higher debt and higher average interest rates. The
effective tax rate increased to 38 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from 33
percent for the year-ago period. This increase was the result of the Crisa acquisition and related
new inter-company debt structure put into place, which will provide
significant future tax savings.
Diluted Net Income Per Share
Diluted loss per share was $0.87 in the first nine months of 2006, compared with diluted income per
share of $0.12 in the first nine months of 2005. Diluted earnings per share for the first nine
months of 2006, as detailed in the attached Table 3, and excluding special charges of $15.1 million
pretax relating to the announced consolidation of two recently acquired Mexican facilities and the
write-off of $4.9 million pretax of finance fees outlined in the attached Table 2, were $0.00 per
diluted share. This compares to diluted earnings per share of $0.60 during the first nine months of
2005, excluding the impact of special charges relating to the 2005 salaried workforce
reduction program and the capacity realignment charges associated with the shutdown of Libbeys
City of Industry, California, facility in February 2005, as detailed in Table 2.
Segment Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
American Glass |
|
$ |
131,005 |
|
|
$ |
88,625 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
$ |
320,669 |
|
|
$ |
260,709 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
North
American Other |
|
|
27,821 |
|
|
|
25,065 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
83,381 |
|
|
|
80,674 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
International |
|
|
28,108 |
|
|
|
22,462 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
77,289 |
|
|
|
70,188 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Eliminations |
|
|
(3,678 |
) |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
183,256 |
|
|
$ |
135,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
476,120 |
|
|
$ |
409,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
American Glass |
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
|
$ |
8,122 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,437 |
|
|
|
-70 |
% |
North
American Other |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
308 |
% |
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
6,137 |
|
|
|
-21 |
% |
International |
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
-162 |
% |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
155 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
9,128 |
|
|
$ |
9,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,464 |
|
|
$ |
12,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, net sales increased 47.8 percent to $131.0 million from
$88.6 million in the year-ago quarter. Excluding Crisa sales, net sales were up 3.5 percent in
total. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to the consolidation of sales of Crisa
and a more than 10 percent increase in net sales to retail
customers. Shipments to foodservice glassware
customers were down slightly as the implementation of a new warehouse management software system in
Toledo resulted in delayed shipments of approximately $3 million of foodservice glassware.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, sales increased 23.0 percent to $320.7 million from
$260.7 million in the year-ago period. Excluding Crisas sales from June 16, 2006 to September 30,
2006, sales increased 5.1 percent compared to the first nine months of 2005. This increase in
sales, excluding Crisa, was attributable to increases of more than 6 percent in shipments to
foodservice glassware customers and retail glassware customers. Shipments to industrial glassware
customers were down almost 7.0 percent during the first nine months of 2006.
EBIT
remained flat at $8.1 million for the third quarter of 2006, compared to the year-ago quarter.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to 6.2 percent in the third quarter 2006, compared to
9.2 percent in the year-ago quarter. EBIT, excluding special charges (See Table 6) decreased by
$0.5 million and was $8.1 million for the quarter, as compared to $8.6 million. As a percentage of
net sales, EBIT,
43
excluding special charges, decreased 3.5 percent to 6.2 percent from 9.7 percent
in the year-ago quarter. The key contributors to the reduction of EBIT, excluding special charges,
compared to the prior year is the increase of almost $2.2 million in charges related to Statement
133 accounting for natural gas contracts (see Note 11) with an offsetting increase from the consolidation of
Crisa for the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
EBIT decreased by $3.8 million for the first nine months of 2006, compared to the year-ago period.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to 0.5 percent in the first nine months of 2006,
compared to 2.1 percent in the year-ago period. EBIT, excluding special charges, (See Table 6),
was $16.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $14.4 million for
the year-ago period. As a percentage of net sales, EBIT, excluding special charges, decreased 0.3
percent to 5.2 percent from 5.5 percent in the year-ago period. The contributors to the
improvement in EBIT, excluding special charges, compared to the prior period were higher sales and
production activity along with the consolidation of Crisa. Partially offsetting these improvements
were higher distribution costs related to the increased sales, the warehouse management software
implementation issues at our Toledo facility, and a $3.1 million increase in charges related to
accounting under Statement 133 for natural gas contracts. (See
Note 11).
North American Other
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, net sales increased 11.0 percent to $27.8 million from
$25.1 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to a
more than 10.0 percent increase in net sales of World Tableware products. Shipments of Traex and
Syracuse China products increased more than 3.5 percent.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, sales increased 3.4 percent to $83.4 million from
$80.7 million in the year-ago period. This increase in sales was attributable to increases of more
than 6.0 percent in shipments to Traex customers. Sales of World Tableware products increased 5.0
percent as compared to the first nine months of 2005. Shipments of Syracuse China products were
down slightly.
EBIT
increased by $1.3 million for the third quarter of 2006, compared to the year-ago quarter.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales increased to 6.0 percent in the third quarter 2006, compared to
1.6 percent in the year-ago quarter. The key contributors to the increase in EBIT compared to the
prior year are the increased sales and an increase in production activity levels.
EBIT decreased by $1.3 million for the first nine months of 2006, compared to the year-ago period.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to 5.8 percent in the first nine months of 2006,
compared to 7.6 percent in the year-ago period. EBIT, excluding special charges, (See Table 6),
was $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $7.1 million for the
year-ago period. As a percentage of net sales, EBIT, excluding special charges, decreased 3.0
percent to 5.8 percent from 8.8 percent in the year-ago period. The contributors to the reduction
in EBIT, excluding special charges, compared to the prior period were higher raw material costs,
increased manufacturing expenses at the Companys Syracuse China facility, along with a reduction
in shipments of Syracuse China products as a result of the 38 day work stoppage in the second
quarter of 2006.
International
For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, net sales increased 25.1 percent to $28.1 million from
$22.5 million in the year-ago quarter. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to a
more than 10.0 percent increase in net sales of Royal Leerdam and Crisal products.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, sales increased 10.1 percent to $77.3 million from
$70.2 million in the year-ago period. This increase in sales was attributable to increases of more
than 6.0 percent in shipments to Royal Leerdam and Crisal customers.
EBIT decreased by $1.8 million for the third quarter of 2006, compare to the year-ago quarter.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales decreased to (2.5) percent in the third quarter 2006, compared to
5.0 percent in the year-ago quarter. The key contributors to the decrease in EBIT compared to the
prior year is the impact of Crisal close-out sales with negative gross margins in the third quarter
of 2006 and start up costs related to our new glass manufacturing plant in China.
EBIT increased by $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2006, compared to the year-ago period.
EBIT as a percentage of net sales increased to 3.9 percent in the first nine months of 2006,
compared to 1.7 percent in the year-ago period. The contributors to the improvement in EBIT
compared to the prior period were increased sales and gross profit in addition to an increase in
pretax equity earnings from Crisa of $3.4 million.
44
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations and available
borrowings under our new senior secured credit facility will be adequate to meet our liquidity
needs for at least the next twelve months. Our ability to fund our working capital needs, debt
payments and other obligations, capital expenditures program and other funding requirements, and to
comply with debt agreements, depends on our future operating performance and cash flow (see Part
II, Item 1A. Risk Factors).
Working Capital
The following table presents working capital items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and DSO, DIO, DPO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance to September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Variance to September 30, 2006 |
and DWC |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
in dollars |
|
in percent |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
in dollars |
|
in percent |
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
104,708 |
|
|
$ |
103,849 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
$ |
79,042 |
|
|
$ |
25,666 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
DSO (1),(7) |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
167,859 |
|
|
|
161,827 |
|
|
$ |
6,032 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
122,572 |
|
|
|
45,287 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
% |
DIO (2),(7) |
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
74.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
73,559 |
|
|
|
59,447 |
|
|
$ |
14,112 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
47,020 |
|
|
|
26,539 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
% |
DPO (3), (7) |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (4) |
|
$ |
199,008 |
|
|
$ |
206,229 |
|
|
$ |
(7,221 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
154,594 |
|
|
$ |
44,414 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
DWC (5),(7) |
|
|
96.8 |
|
|
|
99.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of LTM net
sales (6), (7) |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSO, DIO and DWC are all calculated using net sales as the denominator on a 365 day calendar
year.
(1) |
|
Days sales outstanding (DSO) measures the number of days it takes, to turn receivables into
cash. |
(2) |
|
Days inventory outstanding (DIO) measures the number of days it takes, to turn inventory into
cash. |
(3) |
|
Days payable outstanding (DPO) measures the number of days it takes to pay the balances of
our accounts payable. |
(4) |
|
Working capital is defined as inventories and accounts receivable less accounts payable. |
(5) |
|
Days working capital (DWC) measures the number of days it takes to turn our working capital
into cash. |
(6) |
|
LTM last twelve months |
(7) |
|
The June 30, 2006 calculations exclude the Crisa results of operations for June 16, 2006
through June 30, 2006. The September 30, 2006 calculations include the Crisa results of operations
for the third quarter ending September 30, 2006 and a pro forma amount for the last twelve months. |
46
Working capital, defined as inventories and accounts receivable less accounts payable, was $199.0
million at September 30, 2006, which includes an addition of working capital associated with Crisa
of $46.0 million. Working capital, excluding Crisa, at September 30, 2006 was $153.0 million.
Including Crisa, working capital decreased $7.2 million from June 30, 2006. Excluding Crisa,
working capital decreased $1.6 million from December 31, 2005. These decreases are the result of
higher accounts payable relating to seasonal payments which also
existed at September 30, 2006. However, the Companys working capital, excluding Crisa, was $16.4 million
lower than the year-ago period, primarily as a result of the successful inventory control programs.
Cash Flow
The following table presents key drivers to free cash flow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands, except percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
in dollars |
|
in percent |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
11,149 |
|
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
9,894 |
|
|
|
788.4 |
% |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(20,301 |
) |
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
|
|
(12,912 |
) |
|
|
174.7 |
% |
Proceeds from asset sales and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Acquisitions and related costs |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Free cash flow (1) |
|
$ |
(9,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,911 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,665 |
) |
|
|
(61.8 |
)% |
|
47
Our net cash provided by operating activities was $11.1 million in the third quarter of 2006,
compared to $1.3 million in the prior-year quarter, or an increase of $9.9 million. Our free cash
flow was $(9.6) million during the third quarter 2006, compared to $(5.9) million in the prior-year
quarter, a decrease of $3.7 million. The decrease is attributable to increased capital expenditures
primarily related to the construction of our new plant in China offset by the increase in net cash
provided by operating activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in thousands, except percentages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
in dollars |
|
|
in percent |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
31,524 |
|
|
$ |
12,746 |
|
|
$ |
18,778 |
|
|
|
147.3 |
% |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(54,557 |
) |
|
|
(26,503 |
) |
|
|
(28,054 |
) |
|
|
105.9 |
% |
Proceeds from asset sales and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Acquisitions and related costs |
|
|
(77,995 |
) |
|
|
(28,990 |
) |
|
|
(49,005 |
) |
|
|
169.0 |
% |
|
Free cash flow (1) |
|
$ |
(101,028 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,524 |
) |
|
$ |
(58,504 |
) |
|
|
(137.6 |
)% |
|
(1) |
|
We believe that Free Cash Flow [net cash (used in) provided by operating activities, less
capital expenditures and acquisitions and related costs] is a useful metric for evaluating our
financial performance, as it is a measure we use to internally assess our performance. |
Net cash provided by operating activities was $31.5 million during the first nine months of 2006,
compared to $12.7 million during the year-ago period, or an increase of $18.8 million. The increase
is attributable to higher non-cash special charges and a reduction in working capital. Free cash
flow was $(101.0) million during the nine months ended 2006, compared to $(42.5) million in the
prior year period, a decrease of $58.5 million. This decrease is primarily attributable to our
acquisition of the remaining 51 percent of Crisa for $78.0 million, net of cash acquired, and
increased capital expenditures of $28.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
primarily related to the construction of our new plant in China.
Borrowings
Our borrowings, prior to consummation of the refinancing on June 16, 2006, consisted of a revolving
credit and swing line facility permitting borrowings up to an aggregate total of $195 million, $100
million of privately placed senior notes, a $2.7 million promissory note in connection with the
purchase of our Laredo, Texas warehouse and a euro-based working capital line for a maximum of
10 million. Other borrowings included the RMB Loan Contract and other debt related to Crisal.
On June 16, 2006, Libbey Glass issued, pursuant to private offerings, $306 million aggregate
principal amount of floating rate senior secured notes and $102 million aggregate principal amount
of 16 percent senior subordinated secured pay-in-kind notes, both due 2011. Concurrently, Libbey
Glass entered into a new $150 million Asset Based Loan facility (ABL Facility), expiring in 2010.
Proceeds from these transactions were immediately used to repay existing bank and private placement
indebtedness. In addition, proceeds were used for the acquisition of the remaining 51 percent
equity interest in Crisa, for $80 million, bringing our ownership of Crisa to 100 percent; for
repayment of existing Crisa indebtedness of approximately $71.9 million; and for related fees,
expenses and redemption premiums of Libbey and Crisa.
48
The following table presents our total borrowings at September 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under ABL facility
|
|
floating
|
|
December 16, 2010
|
|
$ |
52,021 |
|
Senior secured notes
|
|
floating (See
Interest Rate
Protection
Agreements below)
|
|
June 1, 2011
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
PIK notes
|
|
|
16.00 |
% |
|
December 1, 2011
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
Promissory note
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
October 2006 to September 2016
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
Notes payable
|
|
floating
|
|
October 2006
|
|
|
422 |
|
RMB loan contract
|
|
floating
|
|
July 2012 to December 2012
|
|
|
27,852 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
floating
|
|
October 2006 to May 2007
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
Other debt
|
|
floating
|
|
September 2009
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
493,839 |
|
Less unamortized discounts and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
Total borrowings net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
485,282 |
|
|
We had total borrowings of $493.8 million at September 30, 2006, compared to total borrowings of
$261.7 million at December 31, 2005. The increase of $232.1 million in borrowings is primarily a
result of the acquisition of the remaining 51 percent of Crisa.
Of our total indebtedness, $189.8 million is subject to fluctuating interest rates at September 30,
2006. A change in one percentage point in such rates would result in a change in interest expense
of approximately $1.9 million on an annual basis.
Included
in Interest Expense is the amortization of discounts and warrants on
the Senior Secured Notes and PIK Notes and financing fees of $1.8
million and $2.0 million for the three months ended and the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.
Interest Rate Protection Agreements
We have Interest Rate Protection Agreements (Rate Agreements) with respect to $200 million of debt
as a means to manage our exposure to fluctuating interest rates. The Rate Agreements effectively
convert this portion of our long-term borrowings from variable rate debt to fixed-rate debt, thus
reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future income. The fixed interest rate for our
borrowings related to the Rate Agreements at September 30, 2006, excluding applicable fees, is
5.24% per year and the total interest rate, including applicable fees, is 12.24% per year. The
average maturity of these Rate Agreements is 3.4 years at September 30, 2006. Total remaining debt
not covered by the Rate Agreements has fluctuating interest rates with a weighted average rate of
11.6% per year at September 30, 2006. If the counterparties to these Rate Agreements were to fail
to perform, we would no longer be protected from interest rate fluctuations by these Rate
Agreements. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.
The fair market value for the Rate Agreements at September 30, 2006, was $(1.7) million. The fair
value of the Rate Agreements is based on the market standard methodology of netting the discounted
expected future variable cash receipts and the discounted future fixed cash payments. The variable
cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observed market
interest rate forward curves. We do not expect to cancel these agreements and expect them to
expire as originally contracted.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We sometimes refer to data derived from consolidated financial information but not required by GAAP
to be presented in financial statements. Certain of these data are considered non-GAAP financial
measures under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation G and Item 10 of Regulation
S-K. We believe that non-GAAP data provide investors with a more complete understanding of
underlying results in our core business and trends. In addition, we use this non-GAAP data to
internally assess performance. Although we believe that the non-GAAP financial measures presented
enhance investors understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP measures should
not be considered an alternative to GAAP.
49
Table 1
Reconciliation of (loss) income before income taxes and minority interest to EBIT and EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
$ |
(6,423 |
) |
|
$ |
6,257 |
|
|
|
$ |
(19,896 |
) |
|
$ |
2,508 |
|
Add: Interest expense |
|
|
15,551 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
|
29,360 |
|
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income taxes (EBIT) |
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
|
9,464 |
|
|
|
12,748 |
|
Add: Depreciation and amortization (adjusted
for minority interest |
|
|
11,060 |
|
|
|
8,943 |
|
|
|
|
27,048 |
|
|
|
25,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, deprecation
and amortization (EBITDA) |
|
$ |
20,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,598 |
|
|
|
$ |
36,512 |
|
|
$ |
38,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges (excluding write-off of finance
fees) pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
15,130 |
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, excluding special charges |
|
$ |
20,188 |
|
|
$ |
19,085 |
|
|
|
$ |
51,642 |
|
|
$ |
48,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2 |
|
Summary of Special Charges
(1) |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,543 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
Special charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total special charges
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
$ |
20,036 |
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For additional information on special charges see Note 6. |
Table 3
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for Special Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
31,568 |
|
|
$ |
27,267 |
|
|
|
$ |
81,886 |
|
|
$ |
75,362 |
|
Special charges reported in cost of sales pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, excluding special charges |
|
$ |
31,568 |
|
|
$ |
27,267 |
|
|
|
$ |
84,429 |
|
|
$ |
76,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
10,839 |
|
|
$ |
9,992 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,788 |
|
|
$ |
12,572 |
|
Special charges (excluding write-off of finance fees) pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
15,130 |
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations, excluding special charges |
|
$ |
10,839 |
|
|
$ |
10,479 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,918 |
|
|
$ |
22,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income tax (EBIT) |
|
$ |
9,128 |
|
|
$ |
9,655 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,464 |
|
|
$ |
12,748 |
|
Special charges (excluding write-off of finance fees) pre-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
15,130 |
|
|
|
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income tax (EBIT), excluding
special charges |
|
$ |
9,128 |
|
|
$ |
10,142 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,594 |
|
|
$ |
22,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,167 |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
12,422 |
|
|
|
6,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income, excluding special charges |
|
$ |
(3,307 |
) |
|
$ |
4,493 |
|
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
8,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.87 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Special charges net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income, excluding special charges, per diluted share |
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
50
Table 4
Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
11,149 |
|
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
31,524 |
|
|
$ |
12,746 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(20,301 |
) |
|
|
(7,389 |
) |
|
|
(54,557 |
) |
|
|
(26,503 |
) |
Proceeds from asset sales and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
Acquisition and related costs |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,995 |
) |
|
|
(28,990 |
) |
|
Free flow cash |
|
$ |
(9,576 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,911 |
) |
|
$ |
(101,028 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,524 |
) |
|
Table 5
Reconciliation of working capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
104,708 |
|
|
$ |
103,849 |
|
|
$ |
79,042 |
|
Plus: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
167,859 |
|
|
|
161,827 |
|
|
|
122,572 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
73,559 |
|
|
|
59,447 |
|
|
|
47,020 |
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
199,008 |
|
|
$ |
206,229 |
|
|
$ |
154,594 |
|
|
Table 6
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for Special Charges Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income tax (EBIT): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
|
$ |
8,122 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,437 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
6,137 |
|
International |
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings before interest and income tax (EBIT) |
|
$ |
9,106 |
|
|
|
9,732 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,530 |
|
|
$ |
12,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
Special charges (excluding write-off of finance fees) pre-tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,130 |
|
|
$ |
8,920 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total special charges (excluding write-off of finance fees) pre-tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,130 |
|
|
$ |
9,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest and income tax (EBIT), excluding special
charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Glass |
|
$ |
8,144 |
|
|
$ |
8,609 |
|
|
|
$ |
16,780 |
|
|
$ |
14,357 |
|
North American Other |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
7,112 |
|
International |
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings before interest and income tax (EBIT), excluding
special charges |
|
$ |
9,106 |
|
|
$ |
10,219 |
|
|
|
$ |
24,660 |
|
|
$ |
22,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
51
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Currency
We are exposed to market risks due to changes in currency values, although the majority of our
revenues and expenses are denominated in the U.S. dollar. The functional currency for our European
business is the euro and in China it is the RMB. The currency market risks include devaluations and
other major currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar, euro, RMB or Mexican peso that could
reduce the cost competitiveness of our products compared to foreign competition.
Natural Gas
We are also exposed to market risks associated with changes in the price of natural gas. We use
commodity futures contracts related to forecasted future natural gas requirements of our domestic
manufacturing operations. The objective of these futures contracts is to limit the fluctuations in
prices paid and potential losses in earnings or cash flows from adverse price movements in the
underlying natural gas commodity. We consider our forecasted natural gas requirements of our North
American manufacturing operations in determining the quantity of natural gas to hedge. We combine
the forecasts with historical observations to establish the percentage of forecast eligible to be
hedged, typically ranging from 40 percent to 60 percent of our anticipated requirements, generally
nine or more months in the future. For our natural gas requirements that are not hedged, we are
subject to changes in the price of natural gas, which affect our earnings.
52
The fair value of our natural gas futures contracts are determined from market quotes and are
reflected on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet in accrued liabilities. At September 30,
2006, we had commodity futures contracts for 4.59 million British Thermal Units (BTUs) of natural
gas with a fair market value of approximately $(6.1) million. Substantially all of our derivatives
qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges. We apply hedge accounting to these instruments only
when the derivative is deemed to be highly effective at offsetting changes in fair values or
anticipated cash flows of the hedged item or transaction. For hedged forecasted transactions, hedge
accounting is discontinued if the occurrence of the forecasted transaction is no longer probable,
and any previously deferred gains or losses are recorded to earnings. We recognize the ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge in current
earnings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized a loss of approximately $1.7
million related to these instruments, which represented the total
impact of accounting under statement 133. This loss is classified in Other Expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as and meets
the required criteria for a cash flow hedge is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and
reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the underlying hedged item
affects earnings and the contracts are closed. Amounts reclassified into earnings related to
natural gas futures contracts of natural gas expense are included in cost of sales.
Pension
We are exposed to market risks associated with changes in the various capital markets. Changes in
long-term interest rates affect the discount rate that is used to measure our pension benefit
obligations and related pension expense. Changes in the equity and debt securities markets affect
the performance of our pension plan asset performance and related pension expense. Sensitivity to
these key market risk factors is as follows:
|
|
|
A change of 1 percent in the expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets would change total pension expense by approximately $2.2
million. |
|
|
|
|
A change of 1 percent in the discount rate would change our total pension expense by approximately $4.2 million. |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) reports are
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the quarter covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There has been no change in our controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
controls over financial reporting.
Item 5. Other Information
On October 17, 2006, the Board of Directors of Libbey, Inc. approved the Libbey Inc. Amended and
Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (Amended
Plan). The Amended Plan amended
the 2006 Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors to permit non-employee directors to defer
receipt of equity compensation, as well as cash compensation, payable to them by the Company.
While cash compensation may be deferred into either an interest bearing account (with interest to
be credited at a rate equal to the yield on 10 year Treasury bills) or a phantom stock account, equity
compensation may be deferred only into the phantom stock account.
53
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
This document and supporting schedules contain statements that are not historical facts and
constitute projections, forecasts or forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
reflect only our best assessment at this time, and may be identified by the use of words or phrases
such as anticipate, believe, expect, intend, may, planned, potential, should,
will, would or similar phrases. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty;
actual results may differ materially from such statements, and undue reliance should not be placed
on such statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only
predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.
Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements for any reason.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Slowdowns in the retail, travel, restaurant and bar or entertainment industries, such as those
caused by general economic downturns, terrorism, health concerns or strikes or bankruptcies within
those industries could reduce our revenues and production activity levels.
Our business is affected by the health of the retail, travel, restaurant and bar or entertainment
industries. Expenditures in these industries are sensitive to business and personal discretionary
spending levels and may decline during general economic downturns. Additionally, travel is
sensitive to safety concerns, and thus may decline after incidents of terrorism, during periods of
geopolitical conflict in which travelers become concerned about safety issues, or when travel might
involve health-related risks. For example, demand for our products in the foodservice industry,
which is critical to our success, was significantly impacted by the events of September 11, 2001.
In addition, demand for glassware in some of the industrial markets that we supply has declined in
recent years. This decline is due, in part, to a decrease in retail sales of candle items by candle
item manufacturers for whom we supply glassware. Demand for glassware with external enamel
decorations that we supply to the foodservice, retail and premium channels and for undecorated
glassware that buyers decorate and redistribute to retail and industrial customers also has
decreased as a result of marketplace confusion related to Californias Proposition 65. Proposition
65 requires that clear and reasonable warnings be given in connection with the sale or distribution
of products that expose consumers to certain chemicals, such as the lead contained in some enamels
used to decorate glassware, that the State of California has determined either are carcinogenic or
pose a risk of reproductive toxicity. We have received claims from retailers for indemnification in
litigation relating to Proposition 65, but we have not made any payments on such claims. Further
declines in these sectors may lead to continued adverse effect on our results of operations. The
long-term effects of events or trends such as these could include, among other things, a protracted
decrease in demand for our products. These effects, depending on their scope and duration, which we
cannot predict at this time, could significantly impact our results of operations and financial
condition.
We face intense competition and competitive pressures, which could adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
Our business is highly competitive, with the principal competitive factors being customer service,
price, product quality, new product development, brand name, and delivery time. Advantages or
disadvantages in any of these competitive factors may be sufficient to cause the customer to
consider changing manufacturers.
Competitors in glass tableware include, among others: Imports from varied and numerous factories
from China; Arc International (a private French company), which manufactures and distributes glass
tableware worldwide; Pasabahce (a unit of Sisecam, a Turkish company), which manufactures glass
tableware in various sites throughout the world and sells to all sectors of the glass industry
worldwide; Oneida Ltd., which sources glass tableware from foreign and domestic manufacturers and
recently emerged from bankruptcy; Anchor Hocking (a unit of Global Home Products, remains in
bankruptcy), a manufacturer and distributor of glass beverageware, industrial products and bakeware
primarily to retail, foodservice and industrial markets; Indiana Glass Company (a unit of Lancaster
Colony Corporation), which manufactures in the U.S. and sells glassware; Bormioli Rocco Group,
which manufactures glass tableware in Europe, where the majority of its sales are to retail and
foodservice customers; and numerous other sourcing companies. In addition, tableware made of other
materials such as plastics compete with glassware.
54
Some of our competitors have greater financial and capital resources than we do and continue to
invest heavily to achieve increased production efficiencies. Competitors may have incorporated more
advanced technology in their manufacturing processes, including more advanced automation
techniques. Our labor and energy costs may also be higher than those of some foreign producers of
glass and ceramic tableware. We may not be successful in managing our labor and energy costs or
gaining operating efficiencies that may be necessary to remain competitive. In addition, our
products may be subject to competition from low-cost imports that intensify the price competition
we face in our markets. Finally, we may need to increase incentive payments in our marketing
incentive program in order to remain competitive. Increases in these payments would adversely
affect our operating margins.
Competitors in the U.S. market for ceramic dinnerware include, among others: Homer Laughlin; Oneida
Ltd.; Steelite; and various sourcing companies. Competitors in metalware include, among others:
Oneida Ltd.; Walco, Inc.; and various sourcing companies. Competitors in plastic products include,
among others: Cambro Manufacturing Company; Carlisle Companies Incorporated; and various sourcing
companies. In Mexico, where a larger portion of our sales are in the retail market, our primary
competitors include Vidriera Santos and Vitro Par in the candle category and imports from foreign
manufacturers located in countries such as China, France, Italy and Colombia in other categories.
Competitive pressures from these competitors and producers could adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
International economic and political factors could affect demand for imports and exports, and our
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted as a result.
Our operations may be affected by actions of foreign governments and global or regional economic
developments. Global economic events, such as changes in foreign import/export policy, the cost of
complying with environmental regulations or currency fluctuations, could also affect the level of
U.S. imports and exports, thereby affecting our sales. Foreign subsidies, foreign trade agreements
and each countrys adherence to the terms of such agreements can raise or lower demand for our
products. National and international boycotts and embargoes of other countries or U.S. imports
and/or exports, together with the raising or lowering of tariff rates, could affect the level of
competition between us and our foreign competitors. Foreign competition has, in the past, and may,
in the future, result in increased low-cost imports that drive prices downward. The World Trade
Organization met in November 2001 in Doha, Qatar, where members launched new multilateral trade
negotiations aimed at improving market access, reducing and eventually phasing out all forms of
export subsidies and substantial reductions in trade-distorting domestic support. The current range
of tariff rates applicable to glass tableware products that are imported into the U.S. and are of
the type we manufacture in North America is approximately 12.5% to 28.5%. However, any negative
changes to international agreements that lower duties or improve access to U.S. markets for our
competitors, particularly changes arising out of the World Trade Organizations ongoing discussions
in Doha, could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. As we
execute our strategy of acquiring manufacturing platforms in lower cost regions and increasing our
volume of sales in overseas markets, our dependence on international markets and our ability to
effectively manage these risks has increased and will continue to increase significantly.
We may not be able to effectively integrate Crisa or future businesses we acquire.
The acquisition of Crisal (completed in January 2005), Crisa (completed in June 2006) and any
future acquisitions are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including:
|
|
the inability to integrate effectively the operations, products, technologies and personnel of the acquired companies (some
of which are spread out in different geographic regions) and to achieve expected synergies; |
|
|
|
the potential disruption of existing business and diversion of managements attention from day-to-day operations; |
|
|
|
the inability to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies or correct deficient standards, controls,
procedures and policies, including internal controls and procedures sufficient to satisfy regulatory requirements of a
public company in the U.S.; |
|
|
|
the incurrence of contingent obligations that were not anticipated at the time of the acquisitions; |
|
|
|
for Crisa, the failure of Vitro to provide necessary transition services to Crisa, including the services of a general
manager, information technology services and others; |
|
|
|
the need or obligation to divest portions of the acquired companies; and |
|
|
|
the potential impairment of relationships with customers. |
55
In addition, we cannot assure you that the integration and consolidation of newly acquired
businesses, including Crisa, will achieve any anticipated cost savings and operating synergies. For
example, integration and consolidation at Crisa entails operational risks in moving and rebuilding
machines and furnaces, reducing headcount and developing internal information technology and other
services that were previously provided by Vitro. The separation of Crisa from Vitro requires us to
renegotiate or replace shared contracts and obtain consents and assignments from third parties, all
of which may result in additional costs. In connection with the planned consolidation of Crisas
two principal manufacturing facilities, we incurred charges of approximately $15.1 million in the
second quarter of 2006 for write-downs of property, plant and equipment, and inventory. We may
incur additional charges in connection with the consolidation of the Crisa facilities. We also
expect to make significant capital expenditures as part of the capital rationalization plan at
Crisa, which we estimate to total approximately $40.0 million over the next three years. The
inability to integrate and consolidate operations and improve operating efficiencies at Crisa could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to achieve the objectives of our strategic plan.
Our strategy to improve our operating performance depends on our ability to defend our leadership
position in the U.S. foodservice market for glass tableware and reduce our enterprise costs through
LEAN initiatives while expanding into low-cost manufacturing platforms and increasing our
international sales. The execution of this multi-pronged strategy depends on our ability to
maintain our margins in the U.S. and Canadian foodservice industry, historically the most
profitable portion of our business but also an increasingly competitive market. We must also be
successful in reducing our cost structure and obtaining the cooperation of our largely union
workforce in doing so. The success of our plan also will depend on our ability to increase sales in
international markets in which we have significantly less experience than our domestic operations,
the successful integration of Crisa into our North American operations and the successful
integration of Royal Leerdam and Crisal to create a more efficient and effective competitor in
Europe. In addition to the significant investment of management time and attention to these
international initiatives, our strategy also will require significant capital to complete the
rationalization and upgrade of the Crisa operations and the China facility expected to be completed
in 2007. Since we intend to benefit from our international initiatives primarily by expanding our
sales in the local markets of other countries, our success depends on continued growth in these
markets, including Europe, Latin America and Asia-Pacific.
Natural gas, the principal fuel we use to manufacture our products, is subject to fluctuating
prices, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Natural gas is the primary source of energy in most of our production processes. With the exception
of our Royal Leerdam operations (where contracts expire in 2007), we do not have long-term
contracts for natural gas and are therefore subject to market variables and widely fluctuating
prices. Consequently, our operating results are strongly linked to the cost of natural gas. Prices
for natural gas have been extremely volatile in the recent past. For example, on July 27, 2005 the
price of the futures strip of natural gas for August 2005
through December 2006, as quoted on NYMEX, was $8.08 per million British Thermal Units (mmbtu). But
on October 20, 2005 (after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita), the price of the 12-month futures strip of
natural gas, as quoted on NYMEX, was $11.67 per mmbtu. We have no way of predicting to what extent
natural gas prices will rise in the future. To the extent that we are not able to offset increases
in natural gas prices, such as by passing along the cost to our customers, these increases could
adversely impact our margins and operating performance.
If we are unable to obtain sourced products or raw materials at favorable prices, our operating
performance could be adversely impacted.
Sand, soda ash, lime, corrugated packaging materials and resin are the principal raw materials we
use. In addition, we obtain glass tableware, metal flatware and hollowware from third parties. We
may experience temporary shortages due to disruptions in supply caused by weather, transportation,
production delays or other factors which would require us to secure our sourced products or raw
materials from sources other than our current suppliers, we may not be able to do so on terms as
favorable as our current terms or at all. In addition, resins are a primary raw material for our
Traex operation and, historically, the price for resins has fluctuated with the price of oil,
directly impacting our profitability. Material increases in the cost of any of these items on an
industry-wide basis would have an adverse impact on our operating performance and cash flows if we
are unable to pass on these increased costs to our customers.
56
Charges related to our employee pension plans resulting from market risk and headcount realignment
may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
In connection with our employee pension plans we are exposed to market risks associated with
changes in the various capital markets. Changes in long-term interest rates affect the discount
rate that is used to measure our pension benefit obligations and related pension expense. Changes
in the equity and debt securities markets affect the performance of our pension plan asset
performance and related pension expense. Sensitivity to these key market risk factors is as
follows:
|
|
|
A change of 1% in the expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets would change our annual total pension expense by approximately $2.2
million based on
year-end data. |
|
|
|
|
A change of 1% in the discount rate would change our annual total pension expense by approximately $4.2 million. |
Because the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments is lower than previous years, our
assumed discount rate has been reduced from 6.25% in 2003 to 5.60% in 2005 for our U.S. pension and
postretirement welfare plans. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit
obligations and increases pension expense. In addition, we have an unfunded nonpension
postretirement obligations in the U.S. and Canada. A change of 1% in the discount rate changes our
annual nonpension postretirement expense by $0.2 million.
As part of our pension expense, we incurred pension settlement charges of $4.9 million in 2005 and
pension curtailment charges of $4.0 million during 2004. These charges were triggered by excess
lump sum distributions taken by employees in connection with headcount reductions related to our
capacity realignment and salaried workforce reduction programs and by headcount reductions related
to the closure of our City of Industry, California manufacturing facility. We anticipate an
additional $3.0 million pension settlement charge in 2006 as a result of excess lump sum
distributions taken by employees. To the extent that we experience additional headcount shifts or
changes as we continue to implement our capacity realignment programs, we may incur further
expenses related to our employee pension plans, which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Our business requires significant capital investment and maintenance expenditures that we may be
unable to fulfill.
Our operations are capital intensive, requiring us to maintain a large fixed cost base. Our total
capital expenditures were $40.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $44.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005, including $13.4 million relating to the construction of our China
facility. Excluding capital expenditures relating to the construction of our China facility,
capital expenditures in 2006 are expected to be approximately $43.0 million, including
approximately $16.0 million of capital expenditures relating to our Crisa operations. Our capital
expenditures on Crisas operations include approximately $13.0 million in 2006 relating to capacity
rationalization as we consolidate Crisas two manufacturing facilities into a single facility. In
addition, we anticipate capital expenditures of approximately $35.0 million in 2006 related to
construction of our China facility.
In the first nine months of 2006, we incurred $54.6 million of our expected 2006 capital
expenditures, including $29.2 million related to our China facility. We anticipate capital
expenditures of $17.6 million for the remaining quarter of 2006, excluding $5.8 million related to
construction of our China facility. We expect to fund the balance of the 2006 capital expenditures
through our lines of credit.
Our business may not generate sufficient operating cash flow and external financing sources may not
be available in an amount sufficient to enable us to make anticipated capital expenditures.
Our business requires us to maintain a large fixed cost base that can affect our profitability.
The high levels of fixed costs of operating glass production plants encourage plant managers to
maintain high levels of output, even during periods of reduced demand, which can lead to excess
inventory levels and exacerbate the pressure on profit margins. For example, in 2005, we liquidated
approximately $13.0 million of inventory at reduced margins and slowed production in certain areas
of our operations, to restore our inventory levels. Our profitability is dependent, in part, on our
ability to spread fixed costs over an increasing number of products sold and shipped, and if we
reduce our rate of production, as we did in 2005, our costs per unit increase, which negatively
impacts our gross margins. Decreased demand or the need to reduce inventories can lower our ability
to absorb fixed costs and materially impact our results of operations.
Unexpected equipment failures may lead to production curtailments or shutdowns.
Our manufacturing processes are dependent upon critical glass-producing equipment, such as
furnaces, forming machines and lehrs. This equipment may incur downtime as a result of
unanticipated failures. We may in the future experience facility shutdowns or periods of
57
reduced production as a result of such equipment failures. Unexpected interruptions in our
production capabilities would adversely affect our productivity and results of operations for the
affected period.
If our investments in new technology and other capital expenditures do not yield expected returns,
our results of operations could be reduced.
The manufacture of our tableware products involves the use of automated processes and technologies.
We designed much of our glass tableware production machinery internally and have continued to
develop and refine this equipment to incorporate advancements in technology. We will continue to
invest in equipment and make other capital expenditures to further improve our production
efficiency and reduce our cost profile. To the extent that these investments do not generate
targeted levels of returns in terms of efficiency or improved cost profile, our financial condition
and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Delays and budget increases related to the construction of our new production facility in China, or
an inability to meet targeted production and profit margin goals after construction, could result
in significant additional costs or lost sales.
We began construction of our new production facility in China during the third quarter of 2005. We
expect that the total cost of this facility will be approximately $52.0 million. We also expect to
incur startup losses in connection with the operation of this new facility in China. We intend to
use this production facility to better supply China and the rest of the Asia-Pacific market and to
improve our competitive position in that region. We plan to begin production of glass tableware at
this facility in early 2007.
Construction delays, regulatory approvals and other factors beyond our control could delay the
start-up of operations in our Chinese facility or significantly increase the costs of its
construction. If we are unable to expand our manufacturing capacity in our Chinese production
facility as planned, we may be unable to satisfy demand for our products in the Asia-Pacific
market, which may result in lost future sales and could adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition. In addition, if we are unable to meet targeted production and profit
margin goals in connection with the operation of our Chinese facility after construction, our
profits could be reduced, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
We may not be able to renegotiate collective bargaining agreements successfully when they expire
and organized strikes or work stoppages by unionized employees may have an adverse effect on our
operating performance.
We are a party to collective bargaining agreements that cover most of our manufacturing employees.
The agreement with our 26 hourly employees at our Mira Loma, California distribution center expires
on November 30, 2006. The agreements with our unionized employees in Toledo, Ohio expire on
September 30, 2007, and the agreement with our unionized employees in Shreveport, Louisiana expires
on December 15, 2008. The collective bargaining agreement with our unionized employees at our
Syracuse China facility expires on May 15, 2009. Crisas collective bargaining agreements with its
unionized employees have no expiration, but wages are reviewed annually and benefits are reviewed
every two years. Crisal does not have a written collective bargaining agreement with its unionized
employees but does have an oral agreement which is revisited annually. Royal Leerdams collective
bargaining agreement with its unionized employees expires on July 1, 2007. We may not be able to
successfully negotiate new collective bargaining agreements without any labor disruption. If any of
our unionized employees were to engage in a strike or work stoppage prior to expiration of their
existing collective bargaining agreements, or if we are unable in the future to negotiate
acceptable agreements with our unionized employees in a timely manner, we could experience a
significant disruption of operations. In addition, we could experience increased operating costs as
a result of higher wages or benefits paid to union members upon the execution of new agreements
with our labor unions. We could also experience operating inefficiencies as a result of
preparations for disruptions in production, such as increasing production and inventories. Finally,
companies upon which we are dependent for raw materials, transportation or other services could be
affected by labor difficulties. These factors and any such disruptions or difficulties could have
an adverse impact on our operating performance and financial condition.
In addition, we are dependent on the cooperation of our largely unionized workforce to implement
and adopt the LEAN initiatives that are critical to our ability to improve our production
efficiency, and the effect of strikes and other slowdowns may adversely affect the degree and speed
with which we can adopt LEAN optimization objectives and the success of that program.
58
We are subject to risks associated with operating in foreign countries. These risks could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We operate manufacturing and other facilities throughout the world. As a result of our
international operations, we are subject to risks associated with operating in foreign countries,
including:
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
war, civil disturbance or acts of terrorism; |
|
|
|
|
taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation; |
|
|
|
|
changes in government policies and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
devaluations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
imposition of limitations on conversions of foreign currencies into dollars or remittance
of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by foreign subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
ineffective intellectual property protection; |
|
|
|
|
hyperinflation in certain foreign countries; and |
|
|
|
|
impositions or increase of investment and other restrictions or requirements by foreign governments. |
The risks associated with operating in foreign countries may have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
High levels of inflation and high interest rates in Mexico could adversely affect the operating
results and cash flows of Crisa.
Mexico has experienced high levels of inflation and high domestic interest rates. If Mexico
experiences high levels of inflation, Crisas operating results and cash flows could be adversely
affected, and, more generally, high inflation might result in lower demand or lower growth in
demand for Crisas glass tableware products.
Fluctuation of the currencies in which we conduct operations could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
Changes in the value of the various currencies in which we conduct operations against the U.S.
dollar, including the euro and the Chinese RMB, may result in significant changes in the
indebtedness of our non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the currencies of our non-U.S. subsidiaries
affect our results as reported in U.S. dollars, particularly the earnings of Crisa as expressed
under U.S. GAAP, and will continue to affect our financial income and expense.
Fluctuations in the value of the foreign currencies in which we operate relative to the U.S. dollar
could reduce the cost competitiveness of our products or those of our subsidiaries.
Major fluctuations in the value of the euro, the Mexican peso or the RMB relative to the U.S.
dollar and other major currencies could reduce the cost competitiveness of our products or those of
our subsidiaries, including our operations in the euro zone, Mexico and China, as compared to
foreign competition. For example, if the U.S. dollar appreciates against the euro, the Mexican peso
or the RMB, the purchasing power of those currencies effectively would be reduced against the U.S.
dollar, making our U.S.-manufactured products more expensive in the euro zone, Mexico and China
compared to local competitors. An appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro, the Mexican
peso or the RMB also would increase the cost of U.S. dollar-denominated purchases for our
operations in the euro zone, Mexico and China, including raw materials, which we would be forced to
deduct from our profit margin or pass along to consumers. These fluctuations could adversely affect
our results of operations and financial condition.
59
Devaluation or depreciation of, or governmental conversion controls over, the foreign currencies in
which we operate could affect our ability to convert the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries into
U.S. dollars.
Major devaluation or depreciation of the Mexican peso could result in disruption of the
international foreign exchange markets and may limit our ability to transfer or to convert Crisas
Mexican peso earnings into U.S. dollars and other currencies, upon which we will rely in part to
satisfy our debt obligations. While the Mexican government does not currently restrict, and for
many years has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to
convert pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer other currencies out of Mexico, the government could
institute restrictive exchange rate policies in the future, which could adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, the government of China imposes controls on the convertibility of RMB into foreign
currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. Shortages in the
availability of foreign currency may restrict the ability of our Chinese subsidiaries to remit
sufficient foreign currency to make payments to us. Under existing Chinese foreign exchange
regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments
and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior
approval from the Chinese State Administration of Foreign Exchange by complying with certain
procedural requirements. However, approval from appropriate government authorities is required
where RMB are to be converted into foreign currencies and remitted out of China to pay capital
expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign currencies. In the future, the
Chinese government could institute restrictive exchange rate policies for current account
transactions. These policies could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
If our hedges do not qualify as highly effective or if we do not believe that forecasted
transactions would occur, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges would be
reflected in our earnings.
We account for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138. We hold derivative financial
instruments to hedge certain of our interest rate risks associated with long-term debt, commodity
price risks associated with forecasted future natural gas requirements and foreign exchange rate
risks associated with transactions denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. These
derivatives qualify for hedge accounting if the hedges are highly effective, and we have designated
and documented contemporaneously the hedging relationships involving these derivative instruments.
If our hedges do not qualify as highly effective or if we do not believe that forecasted
transactions would occur, the changes in the fair value of the derivatives used as hedges will
impact our results of operations and could significantly impact our earnings.
We are subject to various environmental legal requirements and may be subject to new legal
requirements in the future; these requirements could have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
Our operations and properties, both in the U.S. and abroad, are subject to extensive laws,
ordinances, regulations and other legal requirements relating to environmental protection,
including legal requirements governing investigation and clean-up of contaminated properties as
well as water discharges, air emissions, waste management and workplace health and safety. These
legal requirements frequently change and vary among jurisdictions. Our operations and properties,
both in the U.S. and abroad, must comply with these legal requirements. These requirements may have
a material adverse effect on our operations.
We have incurred, and expect to incur, costs to comply with environmental legal requirements, and
these costs could increase in the future. Many environmental legal requirements provide for
substantial fines, orders (including orders to cease operations) and criminal sanctions for
violations. These legal requirements may apply to conditions at properties that we presently or
formerly owned or operated, as well as at other properties for which we may be responsible,
including those at which wastes attributable to the Company were disposed. A significant order or
judgment against us, the loss of a significant permit or license or the imposition of a significant
fine may have a material adverse effect on operations.
60
Our failure to protect our intellectual property or prevail in any intellectual property litigation
could materially and adversely affect our competitive position, reduce revenue or otherwise harm
our business.
Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights. We rely on
a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws, licenses, confidentiality and
other agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. However, this protection may not be
fully adequate. Our intellectual property rights may be challenged or invalidated, an infringement
suit by us against a third party may not be successful and/or third parties could adopt trademarks
similar to our own. In particular, third parties could design around or copy our proprietary
furnace, manufacturing and mold technologies, which are important contributors to our competitive
position in the glass tableware industry. We may be particularly susceptible to these challenges in
countries where protection of intellectual property is not strong. In addition, we may be accused
of infringing or violating the intellectual property rights of third parties. Any such claims,
whether or not meritorious, could result in costly litigation and divert the efforts of our
personnel. Our failure to protect our intellectual property or prevail in any intellectual property
litigation could materially and adversely affect our competitive position, reduce revenue or
otherwise harm our business.
Our business may suffer if we do not retain our senior management.
We depend on our senior management. The loss of services of any of the members of our senior
management team could adversely affect our business until a suitable replacement can be found.
There may be a limited number of persons with the requisite skills to serve in these positions, and
we may be unable to locate or employ such qualified personnel on acceptable terms.
Our high level of debt, as well as incurrences of additional debt, may limit our operating
flexibility, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We have a high degree of financial leverage. As of September 30, 2006, we had drawn $52.0 million
and had $36.7 million available for borrowing under our $150.0 million ABL Facility. In addition,
we had $306 million of Senior Notes and $102 million of PIK Notes outstanding. We have also
obtained a loan in the amount of 250 million RMB (approximately $31.0 million) from China
Construction Bank Corporation Langfang Economic Development Area Sub-Branch (CCBC) to finance the
construction of our greenfield facility in China (China Construction Loan). As of September 30,
2006, we had borrowed 220 million RMB (approximately $27.9 million) under the China Construction
Loan. In addition, we will have a payable of approximately $19.5 million due and payable to Vitro
in the first quarter of 2008. Our ABL facility and the indentures with respect to the Senior Notes
and PIK Notes require us to comply with certain covenants, limits on additional indebtedness and
certain business activities and investments. We may also incur additional debt in the future. Our
high degree of leverage, as well as the incurrence of additional debt, could have important
consequences for our business, such as:
|
|
|
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including with respect to these notes; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to make capital investments in order to expand our business; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing for working capital,
capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions or other
purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to invest operating cash flow in our business and future business
opportunities, because we use a substantial portion of these funds to service debt and
because our covenants restrict the amount of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to withstand business and economic downturns and/or place us at a
competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt, because of the
high percentage of our operating cash flow that is dedicated to servicing our debt; and |
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to pay dividends. |
If we cannot service our debt or if we fail to meet our covenants, we could have substantial
liquidity problems. In those circumstances, we might have to sell assets, delay planned
investments, obtain additional equity capital or restructure our debt. Depending on the
circumstances at the time, we may not be able to accomplish any of these actions on favorable terms
or at all.
In addition, the indenture will contain financial and other restrictive covenants that will limit
our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to
comply with those covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could
result in the acceleration of all of our indebtedness.
61
Despite current indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This
could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.
We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the
indentures with respect to the Senior Notes and PIK Notes and our new ABL Facility do not fully
prohibit us from doing so. If new indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related
risks we now face could intensify.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuers Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
July 1 to July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
August 1 to August 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
September 1 to September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 10, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2.5 million shares
of Libbey, Inc. common stock. Up to 1.0 million additional shares may yet be purchased, but we do
not intend to make further purchases.
Item 5. Other Information
(b) |
|
There has been no material change to the procedures by which security holders may recommend
nominees to the Companys board of directors. |
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this report.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.01 to Registrants Form 8-K filed February 7, 2005
and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated June 16, 2006, among Libbey Glass Inc. and Libbey Europe B.V., Libbey Inc., the other loan
parties party thereto, the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, LaSalle
Bank Midwest National Association, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, Fifth Third Bank, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as
Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated June 16, 2006, among Libbey Glass Inc., Libbey Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto and
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21,
2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
62
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
4.3
|
|
Form of Floating Rate Senior Secured Note due 2011. (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21,
2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 16, 2006, among Libbey Glass Inc., Libbey Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors
party thereto and the Initial Purchasers named therein. (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June
21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Indenture, dated June 16, 2006, among Libbey Glass Inc., Libbey Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors party thereto and
Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.5 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006 and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Form of 16% Senior Subordinated Secured Pay-in-Kind Note due 2011. (filed as Exhibit 4.6 to Registrants Form 8-K
filed June 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Warrant, issued June 16, 2006. (filed as Exhibit 4.7 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006 and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 16, 2006, among Libbey Inc. and Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc. (filed as Exhibit
4.8 to Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement, dated June 16, 2006, among Libbey Glass Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Bank of New
York Trust Company, N.A., Merrill Lynch PCG, Inc. and the Loan Parties party thereto. (filed as Exhibit 4.9 to
Registrants Form 8-K filed June 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan of Libbey Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) (filed herein). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) (filed herein). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herein). |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herein). |
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBBEY INC.
|
|
Date November 9, 2006 |
By |
/s/ Scott M. Sellick
|
|
|
Scott M. Sellick, |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (duly
authorized principal financial officer) |
|
|
64