SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For Quarterly Period Ended: September 30, 2005

o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California		95-3792700
(State of other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

(Former Address)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports ), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  þ     No  o

Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
Yes  o     No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 
Yes o No þ

As of September 30, 2005, the registrant had 10,144,000 shares of its common stock outstanding.

 

 

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Balance Sheets
September 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)

		September 30,				March 31,
		2005				2005
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash		$	434,000			$	177,000
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $50,000 at September 30, 2005, and $39,000 at March 31, 2005			3,013,000				3,745,000
Inventories, net (Note 4)			8,118,000				8,512,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets			472,000				264,000
Deferred income taxes			518,000				461,000
Total current assets			12,555,000				13,159,000
Property and equipment, at cost			6,287,000				6,140,000
Less accumulated depreciation			5,163,000				4,949,000
Net property and equipment			1,124,000				1,191,000
Intangible assets, net			863,000				802,000
Deferred income taxes			568,000				568,000
Other assets			65,000				70,000
Total assets		$	15,175,000			$	15,790,000
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	1,210,000			$	1,196,000
Accrued expenses			1,176,000				1,370,000
Income taxes payable			—				200,000
Total current liabilities			2,386,000				2,766,000
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion			7,000				—
Total liabilities			2,393,000				2,766,000
Shareholders’ equity:
Common shares, $.01 par value, authorized 40,000,000 shares; 10,144,000 and 10,134,000 shares issued and outstanding			13,379,000				13,369,000
Accumulated deficit			(597,000	)			(345,000	)
Total shareholders’ equity			12,782,000				13,024,000
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	15,175,000			$	15,790,000

     See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statements of Operations
For the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005				2004
Net sales		$	5,375,000			$	6,309,000
Cost of sales			3,594,000				3,696,000
Gross profit			1,781,000				2,613,000
Costs and expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative			1,699,000				1,712,000
Research and development			435,000				417,000
Total costs and expenses			2,134,000				2,129,000
Operating income (loss)			(353,000	)			484,000
Other income			13,000				6,000
Earnings (loss) before income taxes			(340,000	)			490,000
Income tax expense (benefit)			(130,000	)			35,000
Net earnings (loss)		$	(210,000	)		$	455,000
Basic earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.02	)		$	0.04
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.02	)		$	0.04
Weighted shares outstanding:
Basic			10,141,000				10,122,000
Diluted			10,141,000				10,598,000

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statements of Operations
For the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)

		Six Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005				2004
Net sales		$	11,270,000			$	12,408,000
Cost of sales			7,388,000				7,375,000
Gross profit			3,882,000				5,033,000
Costs and expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative			3,543,000				3,448,000
Research and development			767,000				827,000
Total costs and expenses			4,310,000				4,275,000
Operating income (loss)			(428,000	)			758,000
Other income			19,000				14,000
Earnings (loss) before income taxes			(409,000	)			772,000
Income tax expense (benefit)			(157,000	)			55,000
Net earnings (loss)		$	(252,000	)		$	717,000
Basic earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.02	)		$	0.07
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.02	)		$	0.07
Weighted shares outstanding:
Basic			10,137,000				10,116,000
Diluted			10,137,000				10,609,000

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statement of Shareholders’ Equity
For the six months ended September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)

		Common Shares								Accumulated
		Shares				Amount				Deficit
Balance as of March 31, 2005			10,134,000			$	13,369,000			$	(345,000	)
Exercise of stock options			10,000				10,000				—
Net loss			—				—				(252,000	)
Balance at September 30, 2005			10,144,000				13,379,000			$	(597,000	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
For the six months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)

		Six Months Ended
		September 30,
		2005				2004
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)		$	(252,000	)		$	717,000
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment			214,000				178,000
Amortization of intangibles			20,000				19,000
Provision for losses on receivables			21,000				7,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable			711,000				(554,000	)
Decrease (increase) in inventories			394,000				(373,000	)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets			(203,000	)			(172,000	)
Decrease (increase) in deferred income tax			(57,000	)			(210,000	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable			7,000				750,000
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses			(194,000	)			(34,000	)
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable			(200,000	)			25,000
Net cash provided by operating activities			461,000				353,000
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to other assets			(81,000	)			—
Capital expenditures			(133,000	)			(92,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(214,000	)			(92,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Exercise of stock options			10,000				38,000
Net cash provided by financing activities			10,000				38,000
Net increase in cash			257,000				299,000
Cash beginning of period			177,000				2,708,000
Cash end of period		$	434,000			$	3,007,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Acquisition of capital assets through capital lease		$	14,000			$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

CHAD THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1.		Interim Reporting
		CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) is in the business of developing, producing, and marketing respiratory care devices designed to improve the efficiency of oxygen delivery systems for home health care and hospital treatment of patients suffering from pulmonary diseases.
		In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary, which are of a normal and recurring nature, for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented, have been made. The results for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ended March 31, 2006. The interim statements are condensed and do not include some of the information necessary for a more complete understanding of the financial data. Accordingly, your attention is directed to the footnote disclosures found in the March 31, 2005, Annual Report and particularly to Note 1 which includes a summary of significant accounting policies.
2.		Revenue Recognition
		The Company recognizes revenue when title and risk of loss transfers to the customer and the earnings process is complete. Under a sales-type lease agreement, revenue is recognized at the time of shipment with interest income recognized over the life of the lease. The Company records all shipping fees billed to customers as revenue, and related costs as costs of good sold, when incurred.
3.		Major Customers

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2005				2004				2005				2004
Customer A**			38.8	%			37.3	%			37.6	%			34.5	%
Customer B**			*				13.7	%			*				14.9	%
Customer C			10.1	%			*				*				*

		The Company’s customers are affected by Medicare reimbursement policy as 80% of home oxygen patients are covered by Medicare and other government programs.
4.		Concentration of Credit Risk
		At times the Company maintains balances of cash that exceed $100,000 per account, the maximum insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company’s right to the cash is subject to the risk that the financial institution will not pay when cash is requested. The potential loss is the amount in any one account over $100,000. At September 30, 2005, the amount at risk was approximately $334,000.

The significant outstanding accounts receivable balances in 2005 were as follows:

		September 30				March 31
Customer A			29.0	%			26.0	%
Customer B			17.8	%			*
Customer C			*				22.6	%

5.		Inventories
		Inventories in 2005 are summarized as follows:

		September 30				March 31
Finished goods		$	2,095,000			$	2,767,000
Work-in-process			1,935,000				1,790,000
Raw materials			4,203,000				4,063,000
Inventory reserve			(115,000	)			(108,000	)
		$	8,118,000			$	8,512,000

6.		Leasing Arrangements
		In the second quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement for certain plant equipment totaling $14,000, with annual lease payments of $7,000, a fixed interest rate of 6% and a purchase option at lease end in August 2007. Amortization of plant equipment under capital leases will be included in depreciation expense.

7.		Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
		Following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2005				2004				2005				2004
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Numerator—net earnings (loss)		$	(210,000	)		$	455,000			$	(252,000	)		$	717,000
Denominator—weighted average common shares outstanding			10,141,000				10,122,000				10,137,000				10,116,000
Basic earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.02	)		$	0.04			$	(0.02	)		$	0.07
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Numerator—net earnings (loss)		$	(210,000	)		$	455,000			$	(252,000	)		$	717,000
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding			10,141,000				10,122,000				10,137,000				10,116,000
Diluted effect of common stock options			—				476,000				—				493,000
			10,141,000				10,598,000				10,137,000				10,609,000
Diluted earnings (loss) per share		$	(0.02	)		$	0.04			$	(0.02	)		$	0.07

		Options to purchase 1,003,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $0.50 to $12.54 per share and 225,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $5.00 to $12.54 were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
8.		Income Tax Expense
		Based on management’s earnings projections for the fiscal year ended 2006, the Company has established an effective tax rate of 40 percent. The Company has California net operating loss carryforwards of $1,936,000 of which $606,000 expires in 2007 and the remaining balance expires in 2013. California suspended the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards during tax years starting in 2002 and 2003. As a result, the Company had been unable to use its California net operating loss carryforwards until the tax year that began April 1, 2004.

9.		Geographic Information
		The Company has one reportable operating segment. Geographic information regarding the Company’s net sales is as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2005				2004				2005				2004
United States		$	4,547,000			$	5,840,000			$	9,656,000			$	11,653,000
Canada			40,000				67,000				96,000				156,000
Japan			72,000				120,000				260,000				183,000
Europe			633,000				20,000				1,105,000				32,000
All other countries			83,000				262,000				153,000				384,000
		$	5,375,000			$	6,309,000			$	11,270,000			$	12,408,000

		All long-lived assets are located in the United States.
		Sales of OXYMATIC® and CYPRESS OXYPneumatic® conservers accounted for 71% and 77% of the Company’s sales for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 69% and 77% for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
10.		Stock Option Plan
		The company accounts for its stock option plan in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. The Company has also adopted the pro forma disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which permits entities to provide pro forma net income and pro forma net earnings per share disclosures as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS 123 had been applied.
		The Company applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 in accounting for the Plan, and no compensation expense has been recognized for its stock options in the accompanying financial statements. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of FASB Statement No.123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2005				2004				2005				2004
Net earnings (loss), as reported		$	(210,000	)		$	455,000			$	(252,000	)		$	717,000
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effects			35,000				29,000				70,000				58,000
Pro forma net income (loss)		$	(245,000	)		$	426,000			$	(322,000	)		$	659,000
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic — as reported		$	(0.02	)		$	0.04			$	(0.03	)		$	0.07
Basic — pro forma			(0.02	)			0.04				(0.03	)			0.07
Diluted — as reported			(0.02	)			0.04				(0.03	)			0.07
Diluted — proforma		$	(0.02	)		$	0.04			$	(0.03	)		$	0.06

The fair value of options granted during each period was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

		Fiscal Year
		2006				2005
Risk-free interest rate			4.3	%			3.3	%
Forfeiture rate			2.0	%			2.0	%
Dividend Yield			.0				.0
Volatility			78	%			98	%
Expected Life (years)			10				10

11.		Reclassifications
		Certain reclassifications have been made to the fiscal year 2005 financial data to conform with the 2006 presentation.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement

Certain statements in this report, including statements regarding our strategy, financial performance and revenue sources, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and are subject to the safe harbors created by those sections. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. The section entitled “Outlook Issues and Risk” set forth in this Form 10-Q and similar discussions in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission made from time to time, including other quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and in our other SEC filings, discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed financial statements and notes thereto.

Overview

CHAD Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) develops, assembles and markets medical devices that furnish supplementary oxygen to home health care patients. The Company was a pioneer in developing oxygen conserving devices that enhance the quality of life for patients by increasing their mobility and, at the same time, lower operating costs by achieving significant savings in the amount of oxygen actually required to properly oxygenate patients. The market for oxygen conserving devices has been, and continues to be, significantly affected by increased competition, consolidation among home oxygen dealers, and revisions (and proposed revisions) in governmental reimbursement policies. All of these factors, as described more fully below, have contributed to a more competitive market for the Company’s products, as devices that were less expensive but which provided lower oxygen savings (or, in some cases, did not truly provide ambulatory oxygen) have achieved some level of success.

The current procedures for reimbursement by Medicare for home oxygen services provide a prospective flat fee monthly payment based solely on the patient’s prescribed oxygen requirement. Under this system, inexpensive concentrators have grown in popularity because of low cost and less frequent servicing requirements. At the same time, oxygen conserving devices, such as the Company’s products, have also grown in popularity due to their ability to extend the life of oxygen supplies and reduce service calls by dealers, thereby providing improved mobility for the patient and cost savings for dealers.

In addition, other changes in the health care delivery system, including the increase in the acceptance and utilization of managed care, have stimulated a significant consolidation among home oxygen dealers. Major national and regional home medical equipment chains have continued to expand their distribution networks through the acquisition of independent dealers in strategic areas. Margins on sales to national chains are generally lower due to quantity pricing and management anticipates continued downward pressure on its average selling price. Four major national chains accounted for approximately 46% and 57% of the Company’s net sales for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 45% and 55% of the Company’s net sales for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. One chain accounted for 39% and 37% of net sales for the three-month periods and 38% and 34% of sales for the six-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and one other chain accounted for 14% and 15% of sales for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2004, respectively. One international customer accounted for 10.1% of net sales during the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. This increased dependence on a limited number of large customers may result in greater volatility and unpredictability of future operating results as changes in the purchasing decisions by one or more major customers can have a material effect upon our financial statements.

The Company believes that price competition and continuing industry consolidation will continue to affect the marketplace for the foreseeable future. To address the competitive nature of the oxygen conserver marketplace, the Company has developed and introduced a number of new products in this area in recent years. The first of these, the OXYMATIC® 401 conserver, received 510(k) clearance from the Food and Drug Administration in June 2000, and shipments of the new product began in July 2000. The second, the OXYMATIC 411 conserver, was cleared in December 2000 and shipments began in January 2001. The third, the OXYMATIC 401A and 411A conservers, received clearance in March 2001 with shipments beginning that month. The SEQUOIA OXYMATIC 300 series conservers began shipping in December 2001, and the Company began shipment of the CYPRESS OXYPneumatic conserver in July 2002. The Company received clearance from the FDA to market its newest oxygen conserving device, the LOTUS Electronic Oxygen Conserver, in October 2004 and began shipment of the new device in November 2005. The LOTUS Electronic Oxygen Conserver weighs less than one (1) pound and will be offered with or without a breath-sensing alarm. It also offers additional liter flow settings and an extended battery life of up to four months of normal usage on two AA-size batteries. Management believes the features and improvements in these products have enabled the Company to regain some of the market share lost in the conserver market prior to 2001 and reestablish the Company as a leader in the conserver market.

In May of 2004, the Company received clearance from the FDA to market its new SAGE™ Oxygen Therapeutic Device. The SAGE device is the first in a planned family of oxygen therapeutic devices that use the Company’s proprietary technologies to sense a patient’s movements and automatically adjust the rate of oxygen delivery to reduce the risk of desaturation as activity increases. This device combines the industry’s first, truly dynamic delivery technology with the proven oxygen sensor technology in the OXYMATIC 400 series conservers. As a result, the new SAGE Oxygen Therapeutic Device addresses the common problem of oxygen desaturation, which causes a patient to feel weak and out of breath when activity increases, while it still improves patient ambulatory capability. This new device underscores the Company’s dedication to

providing home care suppliers and their patients with the widest range of home oxygen choices to suit individual needs, preferences and disease conditions. The Company began selling the SAGE nationwide in October 2004. No estimate can currently be made regarding the level of success the Company may achieve with this line of products or when the additional therapeutic devices that are now in development, and which are based on this advanced new platform, may be introduced to the market.

In 1998 the Company introduced the TOTAL O2® Delivery System, which provides stationary oxygen for patients at home, portable oxygen, including an oxygen conserving device for ambulatory use, and a safe and efficient mechanism for filling portable oxygen cylinders in the home. This provides home care dealers with a means to reduce their monthly cost of servicing patients while at the same time providing a higher quality of service by maximizing ambulatory capability. The Company received clearance in November 1997 from the Food and Drug Administration to sell this product. Initial sales of the TOTAL O2 system were adversely affected by several factors, including the overall home oxygen market climate as well as home care providers’ reluctance to invest in the higher cost of the TOTAL O2 Delivery System to achieve the lower monthly operating costs. Recent changes in home oxygen reimbursement appear to be causing home care providers to examine their operating costs more carefully and this is improving the marketing climate for the TOTAL O2 system.

During the past three years, the Company has recovered substantial market share in the conserver market and is using that platform to spearhead its growth strategy for the future, which includes the following:

•		Development of additional oxygen conserver models, such as the LOTUS Electronic Oxygen Conserver with a view to diversifying the product line in order to offer customers a range of oxygen conservation choices;
•		An effort to expand the Company’s product lines and improve existing products through the investment in and development of new technologies, such as proprietary sensor technology and control software licensed in January of 2003 and the introduction of the SAGE Oxygen Therapeutic Device in May 2004. These new technologies should provide the Company with an opportunity to expand its oxygen delivery product lines and potentially enter the high-growth sleep disorder market; and
•		A continued promotional and educational campaign with respect to the benefits of the TOTAL O2 system.

While the turnaround measures of the past four years have had a positive impact and management believes the current growth strategy should continue to enhance the Company’s competitive position and future operating performance, no assurances can be given that these objectives will be achieved. For example, continuing price pressure on our conservers has depressed operating results for the first six months of fiscal 2006. Management of the Company will continually monitor the success of these efforts and will attempt to remain flexible in order to adjust to possible future changes in the market for respiratory care devices. For information that may affect the outcome of forward-looking statements in this Overview regarding the Company’s business strategy and its introduction of new products, see Outlook: Issues and Risks – New Products,

Consolidation of Home Care Industry, Competition, Rapid Technological Change, and Potential Changes in the Administration of Health Care, beginning on page 17 of the Company’s 2005 Annual Report.

Results of Operations

Net sales for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, decreased by $934,000 (14.8%) and $1,138,000 (9.2%), respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. The primary reasons for the decrease in sales were price reductions on conservers and reduced sales to a large customer. Unit sales of conservers and therapeutic devices for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, decreased 7.4% and 5.8%, respectively, from the prior year, while the decrease in revenues from conserver and therapeutic device sales was 22.2% and 18.3% for the same periods. As noted above, management expects continued downward pressure on its average selling price. In addition, future operating results may be increasingly dependent upon purchase decisions of a limited number of large customers.

Conversely, the Company saw growth in sales of its TOTAL O2 Delivery System during the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Upcoming changes in Medicare reimbursement have increased interest in the TOTAL O2 system as a cost effective way to fulfill home care provider and patient needs. Revenues from TOTAL O2 sales increased 69.9% and 39.3% for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Sales to foreign distributors represented 15.4% and 14.3% of net sales for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively as compared to 7.6% and 6.3% for the same periods in the prior year. For the six-month period ended September 30, 2005, this represented a 107.6% increase over the same period in the prior year. This increase was driven by higher conserver sales and management expects this trend to continue for the balance of the current fiscal year. Management expects an increase in sales to foreign distributors during the upcoming twelve months; however, quarter-to-quarter sales may fluctuate depending on the timing of shipments. All foreign sales are denominated in US dollars.

Cost of sales as a percent of net sales increased from 58.6% to 66.9% and from 59.5% to 65.6% for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. This was a result of downward price pressures in the marketplace, increased sales to certain chains, and a change in the product mix, as the TOTAL O2 system has a lower gross profit margin than conservers. We currently expect downward price pressure for the foreseeable future.

Selling, general, and administrative expenditures remained consistent at 32% and 31% as a percentage of net sales for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. The Company’s cost reduction efforts over the past two years have helped align staffing and operating expenses more closely with current sales expectations but were offset to some extent by growth in the Company’s sales force. Research and development expenses increased by $18,000 and decreased by $60,000 for the three and six-month periods ended September 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in the prior year. Currently management expects research and development expenditures to total approximately $1,512,000 in the

fiscal year ending March 31, 2006, on projects to enhance and expand the Company’s product line. During fiscal year 2005, the Company spent $1,473,000 on research and development.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. At March 31, 2005, the Company determined it was more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets would be realized, and accordingly, released any remaining valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets. The Company has California net operating loss carryforwards of $1,936,000 of which $606,000 expires in 2007 and the remaining balance expires in 2013.

Financial Condition

At September 30, 2005, the Company had cash totaling $434,000 or 2.9% of total assets, as compared to $177,000 (1.1% of total assets) at March 31, 2005. Net working capital decreased from $10,393,000 at March 31, 2005 to $10,169,000 at September 30, 2005. Net accounts receivable decreased $732,000 during the six months ended September 30, 2005, due to the Company receiving full payment in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 of a significant account receivable balance that was unpaid at March 31, 2005. Future increases or decreases in accounts receivable will generally coincide with sales volume fluctuations and the timing of shipments to foreign customers. During the same period, inventories decreased $394,000. In the latter part of fiscal 2005, the Company had a significant inventory build up to fill certain customer orders and anticipated customer orders. Certain of these orders did not materialize. However, there is an active market for the products involved, and the Company believes the inventory will be sold in due course. The Company attempts to maintain sufficient inventories to meet its customer needs as orders are received and new products are introduced. Thus, future inventory and related accounts payable levels will be impacted by the ability of the Company to maintain its safety stock levels. If safety stock levels drop to target amounts, then inventories in subsequent periods will increase more rapidly as inventory balances are replenished.

The Company depends upon its cash flow from operations to meet its capital requirements. Cash derived from operations will depend on the ability of the Company to maintain profitable operations and the timing of increases in receivables and inventories. Historically, the Company has financed its inventory requirements out of cash flow, and it has not sought to finance its accounts receivable. During the next twelve months, the Company intends to seek financing arrangements in order to meet its anticipated capital expenditures and to enhance its working capital resources. The Company has no established lines of credit or other arrangements in place to obtain working capital, and no assurance can be given that if and when needed other sources of working capital would be available. The Company expects capital expenditures during the next twelve months to be approximately $800,000.

The following table aggregates all of the Company’s material contractual obligations as of September 30, 2005:

		Payments Due by Period
						Less than 1				1 – 3				3-5				After 5
		Total				Year				Years				Years				Years
Contractual
Cash Obligations
Operating lease obligations		$	1,224,000			$	435,000			$	789,000				—				—
Minimum royalty obligations		$	3,285,000			$	530,000			$	1,590,000			$	1,090,000			$	75,000
Employee obligations		$	600,000			$	160,000			$	440,000				—				—
Capital lease bligations		$	14,000			$	7,000			$	7,000				—				—

Operating lease commitments consist primarily of a real property lease for the Company’s corporate office, as well as minor equipment leases. Payments for these lease commitments are provided for by cash flows generated from operations. Please see Note 8 to the financial statements in the 2005 Annual Report.

Employee obligations consist of an employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Thomas E. Jones Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Employment Agreement does not have a specific term and provides for a base salary of $160,000 per year, which is subject to annual review of the Board of Directors. The Employment Agreement may be terminated at any time by the Company, with or without cause, and may be terminated by Mr. Jones upon 90 days’ notice. If Mr. Jones resigns or is terminated for cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement), he is entitled to receive only his base salary and accrued vacation through the effective date of his resignation or termination. If Mr. Jones is terminated without cause, he is entitled to receive a severance benefit in accordance with the Company’s Severance and Change of Control Plan, or if not applicable, a severance benefit equal to 200% of his salary and incentive bonus for the prior fiscal year. In estimating its contractual obligation, the Company has assumed that Mr. Jones will voluntarily retire at the end of the year he turns 65 and that no severance benefit will be payable. This date may not represent the actual date the Company’s payment obligations under the Employment Agreement are extinguished.

The Company does not have any debt and is not subject to any covenants or contractual restrictions limiting its operations. The Company has not adopted any programs that provide for post-employment retirement benefits, however, it has on occasion provided such benefits to individual employees. The Company does not have any off balance sheet arrangements with any special purpose entities or any other parties, does not enter into any transactions in derivatives, and has no material transactions with any related parties.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Management believes that the following discussion addresses the accounting

policies and estimates that are most important in the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results.

Allowance for doubtful accounts – the Company provides a reserve against receivables for estimated losses that may result from our customers’ inability to pay. The amount of the reserve is based on an analysis of known uncollectible accounts, aged receivables, historical losses, and credit-worthiness. Amounts later determined and specifically identified to be uncollectible are charged or written off against this reserve. The likelihood of material losses is dependent on general economic conditions and numerous factors that affect individual accounts.

Inventories – the Company provides a reserve against inventories for excess and slow moving items. The amount of the reserve is based on an analysis of the inventory turnover for individual items in inventory. The likelihood of material write-downs is dependent on customer demand and competitor product offerings.

Intangible and long-lived assets – The Company assesses whether or not there has been an impairment of intangible and long-lived assets in evaluating the carrying value of these assets. Assets are considered impaired if the carrying value is not recoverable over the useful life of the asset. If an asset is considered impaired, the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset is written off. The likelihood of a material change in the Company’s reported results is dependent on each asset’s ability to continue to generate income, loss of legal ownership or title to an asset, and the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.

Deferred income taxes – the Company provides a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The likelihood of a material change in the expected realization of these assets depends on the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income.

Outlook: Issues & Risks

The report contains forward-looking statements, which reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual operating results to differ materially from currently, anticipated results. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following:

Dependence Upon a Single Product Line

Although the Company currently markets a number of products, these products comprise a single product line for patients requiring supplementary oxygen. The Company’s future performance is thus dependent upon developments affecting this segment of the health care market and the Company’s ability to remain competitive within this market sector.

Consolidation of Home Care Industry – Dependence on Key Customers – Pressure on Selling Prices

The home health care industry is undergoing significant consolidation. As a result, the market for the Company’s products is increasingly influenced by major national chains.

Four major national chains accounted for 53% of the Company’s net sales during the year ended March 31, 2005, and for 45% of net sales for the six months ended September 30, 2005. One major customer accounted for 36% of net sales for the year ended March 31, 2005, and 38% for the six months ended September 30, 2005. Future sales may be increasingly dependent upon a limited number of customers, which may reduce our average selling price due to quantity pricing and which may result in greater volatility and less predictability of the Company’s operating results. Moreover, the loss of a major customer or a significant decline in orders from a major customer could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s revenues and profitability.

New Products

The Company’s future growth in the near term will depend in significant part upon its ability to successfully introduce new products. In recent years, the Company has introduced the OXYMATIC 400 series, the SEQUOIA, CYPRESS OXYPneumatic, and LOTUS conservers, and the TOTAL O2 Delivery System and in May 2004 introduced the SAGE Oxygen Therapeutic Device. The Company is currently developing additional new products. The success of the Company’s products will depend upon the health care community’s perception of such products’ capabilities, clinical efficacy, and benefit to patients as well as obtaining timely regulatory approval for new products. In addition, prospective sales will be impacted by the degree of acceptance achieved among home oxygen dealers and patients requiring supplementary oxygen. As with any product, the Company’s ability to successfully promote new products cannot be determined at this time.

Competition

The Company’s success in the early 1990’s has drawn competition to vie for a share of the home oxygen market. These new competitors include both small and very large companies. While the Company believes the quality of its products and its established reputation will continue to be a competitive advantage, some competitors have successfully introduced lower priced products that do not provide oxygen conserving capabilities comparable to the Company’s products. Most of these competitors have greater capital resources than the Company. No assurance can be given that increased competition in the home oxygen market will not have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

Availability and Reliability of Third Party Component Products

The Company tests and packages its products in its own facility. Some of its other manufacturing processes are conducted by other firms. The Company expects to continue using outside firms for certain manufacturing processes for the foreseeable future and is thus dependent on the reliability and quality of parts supplied by these firms. From time to time, the Company has experienced problems with the reliability of components produced by third party suppliers. The Company’s agreements with its suppliers are terminable at will or by notice. The Company believes that other suppliers would be available in the event of termination of these arrangements. No assurance can be given, however, that the company will not suffer a material disruption in the supply of parts required for its products.

Rapid Technological Change

The health care industry is characterized by rapid technological change. The Company’s products may become obsolete as a result of new developments. The Company’s ability to remain competitive will depend to a large extent upon its ability to anticipate and stay abreast of new technological developments related to oxygen therapy. The Company has limited internal research and development capabilities. Historically, the Company has contracted with outside parties to develop new products. Some of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater funds and facilities to pursue research and development of new products and technologies for oxygen therapy.

Potential Changes in Administration of Health Care

A number of proposals to regulate, control or alter the method of financing health care costs have been discussed and certain such bills have been introduced in Congress and various state legislatures. Because of the uncertain state and widely varying terms of health care proposals, it is not meaningful at this time to predict the effect on the Company if any of these proposals is enacted.

Approximately 80% of home oxygen patients are covered by Medicare and other government programs. Federal law has altered the payment rates available to providers of Medicare services in various ways during the last several years. In November of 2003, Congress enacted the Medicare Improvement and Modernization Act, which will cause changes and reductions in home oxygen reimbursement over the next several years. These changes in reimbursement will cause increased downward pressure on the average selling price of the Company’s products.

Protection of Intellectual Property Rights

The Company pursues a policy of protecting its intellectual property rights through a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secret laws, and confidentiality agreements. The Company considers the protection of its proprietary rights and the patentability of its products to be significant to the success of the Company. To the extent that the products to be marketed by the Company do not receive patent protection, competitors may be able to manufacture and market substantially similar products. Such competition or claims that the Company’s products infringe the patent or trademark rights of others could have an adverse impact upon the Company’s business.

Product Liability

The nature of the Company’s business subjects it to potential legal actions asserting that the Company is liable for damages for product liability claims. Although the Company maintains product liability insurance in an amount which it believes to be customary in the industry, there is no assurance that this insurance will be sufficient to cover the cost of defense or judgments which might be entered against the Company. The type and frequency of these claims could have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

Accounting Standards

Accounting standards promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board change periodically. Changes in such standards may have an impact on the Company’s future financial position.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123R (“Share-Based Payment”). SFAS 123R requires the Company to recognize compensation expense based on the fair value of equity instruments awarded to employees. We will adopt SFAS 123R on April 1, 2006, and the Company does not anticipate a significant impact to its financial statements.

Additional Risk Factors

Additional factors, which might affect the Company’s performance, may be listed from time to time in the reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

The Company has no significant exposure to market risk sensitive instruments or contracts.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2005 (the “Evaluation Date”). Such evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and its Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based upon such evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the Company record, process, summarize, and report information required to be disclosed by the Company in its quarterly reports filed under Securities Exchange Act within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II
Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     The Company held its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders as further discussed below:

(a)

The Company’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on September 16, 2005 in Woodland Hills, California.

	(b)		Proxies for the Annual Meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, here was no solicitation in opposition to the management’s nominees as listed in the proxy statement, and all of such nominees were elected.
	(c)		At the Annual Meeting, the following matters were considered and voted upon:

(i)

The election of four directors to the Company’s board of directors, which currently consists of seven persons. Only four positions on the Company’s board of directors were to be elected at the Annual Meeting. At the Annual Meeting, the Company’s shareholders elected each of the following director nominees as directors, to serve on the Company’s board of directors until the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of 2006 or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The vote for each director was as follows:

(ii)

Name		For				Against				Withheld
Philip T. Wolfstein			9,561,187				196,266
James M. Brophy			9,702,939				54,514
Kathleen M. Griggs			9,586,621				170,813

(iii)

To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. At the Annual meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved this proposal by the votes indicated below:

		Shares
For			9,737,404
Against			11,158
Abstain			8,891

(d)

None

None

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)			31.1			Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO
(b)			31.2			Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO
(c)			32*			Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The information in Exhibit 32 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (including this quarterly report), unless CHAD Therapeutics specifically incorporates the foregoing information into those documents by reference.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		CHAD THERAPEUTICS, Inc.
		(Registrant)
Date 11/14/2005		/s/ Earl L. Yager
		Earl L. Yager
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date 11/14/2005		/s/ Tracy A. Kern
		Tracy A. Kern
		Chief Financial Officer

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits
31.1		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CEO
31.2		Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for CFO
32*		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.1		Press release

* The information in Exhibit 32 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (including this quarterly report), unless CHAD Therapeutics specifically incorporates the foregoing information into those documents by reference.