e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
Commission File Number 1-14443
Gartner, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
04-3099750 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
P.O. Box 10212
|
|
06902-7700 |
56 Top Gallant Road
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Stamford, CT |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (203) 316-1111
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 30, 2010, 96,186,715 shares of the registrants common shares were outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
GARTNER, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
105,913 |
|
|
$ |
116,574 |
|
Fees receivable, net |
|
|
303,165 |
|
|
|
317,598 |
|
Deferred commissions |
|
|
63,477 |
|
|
|
70,253 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
61,717 |
|
|
|
53,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
534,272 |
|
|
|
557,825 |
|
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
48,090 |
|
|
|
52,466 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
509,755 |
|
|
|
513,612 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
21,182 |
|
|
|
24,113 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
67,528 |
|
|
|
67,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,180,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
155,218 |
|
|
$ |
255,966 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
463,236 |
|
|
|
437,207 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
264,000 |
|
|
|
205,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
882,454 |
|
|
|
898,173 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
103,000 |
|
|
|
124,000 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
79,421 |
|
|
|
80,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,064,875 |
|
|
|
1,102,744 |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.0005 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 156,234,416 shares issued
for both periods |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
588,027 |
|
|
|
590,864 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net |
|
|
9,401 |
|
|
|
11,322 |
|
Accumulated earnings |
|
|
528,795 |
|
|
|
509,392 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 60,052,945 and 60,356,672 common shares, respectively |
|
|
(1,010,349 |
) |
|
|
(999,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
115,952 |
|
|
|
112,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,180,827 |
|
|
$ |
1,215,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GARTNER, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research |
|
$ |
210,673 |
|
|
$ |
187,688 |
|
Consulting |
|
|
71,639 |
|
|
|
70,319 |
|
Events |
|
|
13,521 |
|
|
|
15,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
295,833 |
|
|
|
273,533 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and product development |
|
|
123,046 |
|
|
|
116,644 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
130,568 |
|
|
|
115,564 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Acquisition and integration charges |
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
266,635 |
|
|
|
239,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
29,198 |
|
|
|
34,451 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(3,384 |
) |
|
|
(4,180 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
27,566 |
|
|
|
29,025 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,163 |
|
|
|
9,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,403 |
|
|
$ |
19,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
95,963 |
|
|
|
93,898 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
99,649 |
|
|
|
95,763 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
GARTNER, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,403 |
|
|
$ |
19,996 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles |
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
|
6,874 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
9,159 |
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(5,188 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
1,130 |
|
Amortization of debt issue costs |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees receivable, net |
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
57,688 |
|
Deferred commissions |
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
5,196 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(2,520 |
) |
|
|
592 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(6,442 |
) |
|
|
2,528 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
30,651 |
|
|
|
(19,760 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued, and other liabilities |
|
|
(76,603 |
) |
|
|
(66,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(7,966 |
) |
|
|
14,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(3,412 |
) |
|
|
(4,536 |
) |
Acquisitions (net of cash received) |
|
|
(11,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(15,108 |
) |
|
|
(4,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock issued for stock plans |
|
|
6,714 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
Proceeds from debt issuance |
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on debt |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
(78,250 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(35,172 |
) |
|
|
(2,150 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
14,730 |
|
|
|
(79,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(8,344 |
) |
|
|
(69,215 |
) |
Effects of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
(1,451 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
116,574 |
|
|
|
140,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
105,913 |
|
|
$ |
70,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
GARTNER, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The fiscal year of Gartner, Inc. (the Company) represents the period from January 1 through
December 31. When used in these notes, the terms Company, we, us, or our refer to Gartner,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
These interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America, as defined in
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 270 for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X on Form
10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes
of Gartner, Inc. filed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In the opinion of management, all normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the
periods presented herein have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 may not be indicative of the results of operations for the remainder of 2010.
Principles of consolidation. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Use of estimates. The preparation of the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates
and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures
about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Such
estimates include the valuation of accounts receivable, goodwill, intangible assets, and other
long-lived assets, as well as tax accruals and other liabilities. In addition, estimates are used
in revenue recognition, income tax expense, performance-based compensation charges, depreciation
and amortization, and the allowance for losses. Management believes its use of estimates in the
interim condensed consolidated financial statements to be reasonable.
Management evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the general economic environment and actions it may take in the future. We
adjust such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. However, these estimates may involve
significant uncertainties and judgments and cannot be determined with precision. In addition, these
estimates are based on our best judgment at a point in time and as such these estimates may
ultimately differ from actual results. Changes in estimates resulting from weakness in the economic
environment or other factors beyond our control could be material and would be reflected in the
Companys financial statements in future periods.
Note 2 Acquisitions
In December 2009 the Company acquired AMR Research, Inc. (AMR Research) and Burton Group, Inc.
(Burton Group). The Companys consolidated results include the operating results of these
acquisitions beginning on their respective acquisition dates. The Company recorded $3.5 million of
acquisition and integration charges related to these acquisitions in the three months ended March
31, 2010.
The Company paid a total of $117.3 million in cash for all of the outstanding shares of AMR
Research and Burton Group. The final cash purchase price is subject to certain post-close working
capital adjustments, which the Company expects will be resolved in the quarterly period ending June
30, 2010. The Company considers the allocation of the purchase price to be preliminary as it
relates to both the working capital adjustments and certain tax related items.
In connection with the acquisitions, the Company received contractual indemnifications from the
selling shareholders for certain pre-acquisition liabilities of the acquired companies. The Company
estimated these liabilities at approximately $6.1 million. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805,
the Company recorded a $6.1 million receivable in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and a
$6.1 million liability in Accrued liabilities, which were included in the purchase price
allocation. The Company believes the indemnification assets are fully collectible, since a portion
of the sale proceeds were escrowed pending resolution of the liabilities.
6
In March 2010, approximately $1.5 million of these pre-acquisition liabilities were settled and
paid from the escrowed funds, resulting in a reduction of $1.5 million in both the recorded
receivable and liability. The $1.5 million settlement had no impact on the Companys results of
operations, cash flows, or recorded goodwill.
Note 3 Comprehensive Income
The components of Comprehensive income include net income, foreign currency translation
adjustments, realized and unrealized gains or losses on interest rate swaps, and unrealized gains
and losses on defined benefit pension plans. Amounts recorded in Comprehensive income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income: |
|
$ |
19,403 |
|
|
$ |
19,996 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(2,540 |
) |
|
|
1,188 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
Amortization of realized gain on terminated interest rate swap |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Amortization of pension unrealized gain |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
17,482 |
|
|
$ |
21,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 Computation of Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income used for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
19,403 |
|
|
$ |
19,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in the calculation of
basic earnings per share |
|
|
95,963 |
|
|
|
93,898 |
|
Common stock equivalents associated with stock-based compensation
plans (1) |
|
|
3,686 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share |
|
|
99,649 |
|
|
|
95,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 0.5 million and 3.8 million,
respectively, of common stock equivalents were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants stock-based compensation awards as an incentive for employees and directors to
contribute to the Companys long-term success. The Companys stock compensation awards include
stock-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, service- and performance-based
restricted stock units, common stock equivalents, and stock options. At March 31, 2010, the Company
had approximately 6.4 million shares of its common stock, par
value $.0005 per share (the Common
Stock) available for awards of stock-based compensation under its 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topics 505 and 718,
as interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins No. 107 (SAB No. 107) and No. 110 (SAB No.
110). Stock-based compensation expense is based on the fair value of the award on the date of
grant, which is recognized over the related service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The
service period is the period over which the related service is performed, which is generally the
same as the vesting period. At the present time, the Company issues treasury shares upon the
exercise, release or settlement of stock-based compensation awards.
7
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock compensation
awards requires the input of certain highly complex and subjective assumptions, including the
expected life of the stock compensation awards and the Common Stock price volatility. In addition,
determining the appropriate amount of associated periodic expense requires management to estimate
the amount of employee forfeitures and the likelihood of the achievement of certain performance
targets. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock compensation awards and the
associated periodic expense represent managements best estimates, but these estimates involve
inherent uncertainties and the application of judgment. As a result, if factors change and the
Company deems it necessary in the future to modify the assumptions it made or to use different
assumptions, or if the quantity and nature of the Companys stock-based compensation awards
changes, then the amount of expense may need to be adjusted and future stock compensation expense
could be materially different from what has been recorded in the current period.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The Company recognized the following amounts of stock-based compensation expense by award type in
the periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Award type: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Stock appreciation rights (SARs) |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Common stock equivalents (CSEs) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Restricted stock units (RSUs) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (1) |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $2.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for charges determined in accordance
with the Companys retirement-eligible policy. |
Stock-based compensation was recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Amount recorded in: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of services and product development |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had $60.3 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation
cost, which is expected to be recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining
weighted-average service period of approximately 2.4 years.
Stock-Based Compensation Awards
The following disclosures provide information regarding the Companys stock-based compensation
awards, all of which are classified as equity awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 505:
Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs) are settled in common shares and are similar to
stock options as they permit the holder to participate in the appreciation of the Common Stock.
SARs may be settled in shares of Common Stock by the employee once the applicable vesting criteria
have been met. SARs vest ratably over a four-year service period and expire seven years from the
grant date. The fair value of SARs awards is recognized as compensation expense on a straight-line
basis over four years. SARs are awarded only to the Companys executive officers.
When SARs are exercised, the number of shares of Common Stock issued is calculated as follows: (1)
the total proceeds from the SARs exercise (calculated as the closing price of the Common Stock on
the date of exercise less the exercise price of the SARs, multiplied by the number of SARs
exercised) is divided by (2) the closing price of the Common Stock on the exercise date. The
Company will withhold a portion of the share of Common Stock issued upon exercise to satisfy
minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. SARs recipients do not have any of the rights of a
Gartner stockholder, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends and distributions,
until after actual shares of common stock are issued in respect of the award, which is subject to
the prior satisfaction of the vesting and other criteria relating to such grants.
8
A summary of the changes in SARs outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2010, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
SARs in |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
millions |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Term |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.43 |
|
|
$ |
6.09 |
|
|
4.67 years |
Granted |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
22.06 |
|
|
|
8.27 |
|
|
6.87 years |
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
na |
Exercised |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
14.48 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
na |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 (1) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
16.74 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
5.01 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2010 (1) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.90 |
|
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
|
4.17 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
na=not applicable
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At March 31, 2010, SARs outstanding had an intrinsic value of $17.2 million. SARs vested
and exercisable had an intrinsic value of $6.7 million. |
The fair value of the SARs was determined on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Expected dividend yield (1) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility (2) |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate (3) |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Expected life in years (4) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The dividend yield assumption is based on the history and expectation of the Companys
dividend payouts. Historically, Gartner has not paid cash dividends on its common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
The determination of expected stock price volatility was based on both historical Common
Stock prices and implied volatility from publicly traded options in Common Stock. |
|
(3) |
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity
similar to the expected life of the award. |
|
(4) |
|
The expected life in years is based on the simplified calculation provided for in SEC SAB
No. 107. The simplified method determines the expected life in years based on the vesting
period and contractual terms as set forth when the award is made. The Company continues to use
the simplified method for SARs awards, as permitted by SEC SAB No. 110, since it does not have
the necessary historical exercise and forfeiture data to determine an expected life. |
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, and Common Stock Equivalents
Restricted stock awards give the awardee the right to vote and to receive dividends and
distributions on these shares; however, the awardee may not sell the restricted shares until all
restrictions on the release of the shares have lapsed and the shares are released.
Restricted stock units (RSUs) give the awardee the right to receive Common Stock when the vesting
conditions are met and the restrictions lapse, and each RSU that vests entitles the awardee to one
common share. RSU awardees do not have any of the rights of a Gartner stockholder, including voting
rights and the right to receive dividends and distributions, until after the common shares are
released.
Common stock equivalents (CSEs) are convertible into Common Stock, and each CSE entitles the holder
to one common share. Certain members of our Board of Directors receive directors fees payable in
CSEs unless they opt for cash payment. Generally, the CSEs are converted when service as a director
terminates unless the director has elected an accelerated release.
The fair value of restricted stock, RSUs, and CSEs is determined on the date of grant based on the
closing price of the Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on that date. The fair
value of these awards is recognized as compensation expense as
9
follows: (i) restricted stock awards
vest based on the achievement of a market condition and are expensed on a straight-line basis over
approximately three years; (ii) service-based RSUs vest ratably over four years and are expensed on
a straight-line basis over four years; (iii) performance-based RSUs are subject to both performance
and service conditions, vest ratably over four years, and are expensed on an accelerated basis; and
(iv) CSEs vest immediately and are recorded as expense on the date of grant.
A summary of the changes in restricted stock, RSUs and CSEs during the three months ended March 31,
2010, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Stock Units |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Equivalents |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
|
(RSUs) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
|
(CSEs) |
|
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.30 |
|
|
|
3,763,805 |
|
|
$ |
14.57 |
|
|
|
135,224 |
|
|
na |
|
Granted (2), (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084,115 |
|
|
|
22.06 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
22.41 |
|
Vested or released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(952,373 |
) |
|
|
15.34 |
|
|
|
(31,042 |
) |
|
na |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,578 |
) |
|
|
16.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
na |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 (4), (5) |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.30 |
|
|
|
3,855,969 |
|
|
$ |
16.29 |
|
|
|
108,852 |
|
|
na |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
na=not available
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Per share. |
|
(2) |
|
The 1.1 million RSUs consisted of 0.5 million performance-based RSUs awarded to executives
and 0.6 million service-based RSUs awarded to non-executive employees. |
|
|
|
The 0.5 million performance-based RSUs represent the target amount of the award. The actual
number of RSUs that will ultimately be granted will be between 0% and 200% of the target amount,
depending on the level of achievement of the performance metric. The performance metric is the
dollar level of the Companys ending subscription-based contract value for 2010. If the specified
minimum level of achievement is not met, the performance-based RSUs will be forfeited in their
entirety, and any compensation expense already recorded will be reversed. |
|
(3) |
|
CSEs represent fees paid to directors. The CSEs vest when granted and are convertible into
common shares when the director leaves the Board of Directors or earlier if the director
elects to accelerate the release. |
|
(4) |
|
Vesting on the 200,000 shares of restricted stock held by our CEO is subject to a market
condition as follows: (i) 100,000 shares will vest when the Common Stock trades at an average
price of $25 or more each trading day for sixty consecutive trading days; and (ii) 100,000
shares will vest when the Common Stock trades at an average price of $30 or more each trading
day for sixty consecutive trading days. There is no remaining unamortized cost on these
shares. |
|
(5) |
|
The weighted-average remaining contractual term of the RSUs is 1.7 years. The restricted
stock awards and the CSEs have no defined contractual term. |
Stock Options
Historically, the Company granted stock options to employees that allowed them to purchase shares
of the Companys common stock at a certain price. The Company has not made significant stock option
grants since 2005. All outstanding options are fully vested and there is no remaining unamortized
cost. The Company received approximately $5.9 million in cash from option exercises in the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
A summary of the changes in stock options outstanding in the three months ended March 31, 2010,
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Options in |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
millions |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.65 |
|
|
3.07 years |
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
na |
|
|
na |
|
Exercised (1) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
na |
|
|
na |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
10.71 |
|
|
2.89 years |
|
|
$ |
47.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
na=not applicable
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2010 had an intrinsic value of
$7.6 million. |
10
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company has an employee stock purchase plan (the ESPP Plan) under which eligible employees
are permitted to purchase Common Stock through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 10% of an
employees compensation (or $23,750 in any calendar year), at a price equal to 95% of the closing
price of the Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange at the end of each offering
period.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had approximately 1.5 million shares available for purchase under
the ESPP Plan. The ESPP Plan is considered non-compensatory under FASB ASC Topic 718, and as a
result the Company does not record compensation expense related to employee share purchases. The
Company received approximately $0.8 million in cash from share purchases under the Plan in the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
Note 6 Segment Information
The Company manages its business in three reportable segments: Research, Consulting and Events.
Research consists primarily of subscription-based research products, access to research inquiry, as
well as peer networking services and membership programs. Consulting consists primarily of
consulting, measurement engagements, and strategic advisory services. Events consists of various
symposia, conferences, and exhibitions.
The Company evaluates reportable segment performance and allocates resources based on gross
contribution margin. Gross contribution, as presented in the table below, is defined as operating
income excluding certain Cost of services and product development and Selling, general and
administrative (SG&A) expenses, depreciation, acquisition and integration charges, amortization
of intangibles, and Other charges. Certain bonus and fringe benefit costs included in consolidated
Cost of services and product development are not allocated to segment expense. The accounting
policies used by the reportable segments are the same as those used by the Company.
The Company does not identify or allocate assets, including capital expenditures, by reportable
segment. Accordingly, assets are not reported by segment because the information is not available
and is not reviewed in the evaluation of segment performance or in making decisions in the
allocation of resources. There are no inter-segment revenues.
The following tables present information about the Companys reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
210,673 |
|
|
$ |
71,639 |
|
|
$ |
13,521 |
|
|
$ |
295,833 |
|
Gross contribution |
|
|
138,735 |
|
|
|
28,422 |
|
|
|
5,215 |
|
|
|
172,372 |
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
187,688 |
|
|
$ |
70,319 |
|
|
$ |
15,526 |
|
|
$ |
273,533 |
|
Gross contribution |
|
|
124,731 |
|
|
|
27,020 |
|
|
|
4,783 |
|
|
|
156,534 |
|
Corporate and other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Note 7 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of acquired businesses over the estimated fair
value of the tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired. The evaluation of goodwill
is performed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, which requires an annual assessment of
potential goodwill impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit can be an operating
segment or a business if discrete financial information is prepared and reviewed by management.
Under the impairment test, if a reporting units carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value,
goodwill impairment is recognized to the extent that the reporting units carrying amount of
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill. The fair value of reporting units is
estimated using discounted cash flows, market multiples, and other valuation techniques.
The following table presents changes to the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting segment during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research |
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Events |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
370,630 |
|
|
$ |
100,744 |
|
|
$ |
42,238 |
|
|
$ |
513,612 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(2,833 |
) |
|
|
(962 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(3,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
367,797 |
|
|
$ |
99,782 |
|
|
$ |
42,176 |
|
|
$ |
509,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Noncompete |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Content |
|
|
Trade Name |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Agreements |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross cost |
|
$ |
10,634 |
|
|
$ |
5,758 |
|
|
$ |
14,910 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
31,703 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,772 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(8,150 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(10,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
8,862 |
|
|
$ |
5,470 |
|
|
$ |
6,760 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
21,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Noncompete |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Content |
|
|
Trade Name |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Agreements |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross cost |
|
$ |
10,634 |
|
|
$ |
5,758 |
|
|
$ |
14,910 |
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
|
$ |
31,718 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,315 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(7,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
10,634 |
|
|
$ |
5,758 |
|
|
$ |
7,595 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
24,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are being amortized against earnings over the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
Noncompete |
|
|
Content |
|
Trade Name |
|
Relationships |
|
Agreements |
Useful Life (Years) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2-5 |
|
Aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets was $2.9 million and $0.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The estimated future amortization expense by year from purchased intangibles is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (remaining nine months) |
|
$ |
7,605 |
|
2011 |
|
|
6,525 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2,955 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,955 |
|
2015 and thereafter |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Debt
Credit Agreement
The Company has a Credit Agreement dated as of January 31, 2007, that provides for a $300.0 million
revolving credit facility and a five-year, $180.0 million term loan (the original term loan). On
April 9, 2008, the Company entered into a First Amendment with the lenders to the Credit Agreement,
which provided for a
new $150.0 million term loan (the 2008 term loan). The revolving credit
facility may be increased up to an additional $100.0 million at the discretion of the Companys
lenders (the expansion feature), for a
12
total revolving credit facility of $400.0 million.
However, the $100.0 million expansion feature may or may not be available to the Company depending
upon prevailing credit market conditions. To date, the Company has not sought to borrow under the
expansion feature.
The following table provides information regarding amounts outstanding under the Companys Credit
Agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
March 31, 2010(3) |
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Term Loan (1) |
|
$ |
126,000 |
|
|
$ |
117,000 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
% |
2008 Term Loan (1) |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
% |
Revolver (2) |
|
|
128,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
329,000 |
|
|
$ |
367,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company repaid $9.0
million of the original term loan and $5.0 million of the 2008 term
loan pursuant to the loan amortization schedules. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company had approximately $118.6 million of available borrowing
capacity on the revolver (not including the expansion feature) as of
March 31, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
The annualized effective rate on the original term loan consisted of
the interest rate swap rate (see below) of 5.06% plus a margin of
0.88%. The effective rate on the 2008 term loan consisted of a
three-month LIBOR base rate plus a margin of 1.25%, while the revolver
rate consisted of a LIBOR base rate plus a margin of 0.88%. |
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement carry interest rates that are either prime-based or
Libor-based. Interest rates under these borrowings include a base rate plus a margin between 0.00%
and 0.75% on Prime-based borrowings and between 0.625% and 1.75% on Libor-based borrowings.
Generally, the Companys borrowings are Libor-based. The revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid
and reborrowed until January 31, 2012, at which time all amounts borrowed must be repaid. The
revolver borrowing capacity is reduced for both amounts outstanding under the revolver and for
letters of credit.
The original term loan will be repaid in 18 consecutive quarterly installments which commenced on
September 30, 2007, with the final payment due on January 31, 2012, and may be prepaid at any time
without penalty or premium at the option of the Company. The 2008 term loan is co-terminus with the
original 2007 term loan under the Credit Agreement and will be repaid in 16 consecutive quarterly
installments which commenced June 30, 2008, plus a final payment due on January 31, 2012, and may
be prepaid at any time without penalty or premium at the option of Gartner.
The Credit Agreement contains certain customary restrictive loan covenants, including, among
others, financial covenants requiring a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio, and a minimum annualized contract value ratio and covenants limiting Gartners ability to
incur indebtedness, grant liens, make acquisitions, be acquired, dispose of assets, pay dividends,
repurchase stock, make capital expenditures, and make investments. A failure to comply with these
covenants in the future could result in acceleration of all amounts outstanding under the Credit
Agreement, which would materially impact our financial condition unless accommodations could be
negotiated with our lenders. The Company was in full compliance with its financial covenants as of
March 31, 2010.
Interest Rate Swap Contract
The Company has an interest rate swap contract that hedges the base interest rate risk on its
original term loan. The effect of the swap is to convert the floating base rate on the term loan to
a fixed rate. Under the swap terms, the Company pays a fixed rate of 5.06% on the original term
loan and in return receives a three-month LIBOR rate. The three-month LIBOR rate received on the
swap matches the base rate paid on the term loan since the Company optionally selects a three-month
LIBOR rate on the term loan. The notional amount of the interest rate swap declines over time and
constantly matches the outstanding amount of the term loan. Other critical terms of the swap and
the term loan also match.
13
The Company accounts for the interest rate swap on its original term loan as a cash flow hedge in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815. Since the swap is hedging the forecasted interest payments on
the term loan and qualifies as a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the swap are
recorded in Other comprehensive income as long as the swap continues to be a highly effective hedge
of the base interest rate risk on the term loan. Any ineffective portion of change in the fair
value of the hedge is recorded in earnings. At March 31, 2010 there was no ineffective portion of
the hedge. The interest rate swap had a negative fair value of approximately $5.8 million at March
31, 2010, which is recorded in Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect.
Letters of Credit
The Company issues letters of credit and related guarantees in the ordinary course of business to
facilitate transactions with customers and others. At March 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding
letters of credit and guarantees of approximately $1.7 million.
Note 9 Equity and Stock Programs
Share Repurchases
The Company has a $250.0 million authorized stock repurchase program, of which $43.5 million
remained available for repurchases as of March 31, 2010. Repurchases are made from time-to-time
through open market purchases and are subject to the availability of stock, prevailing market
conditions, the trading price of the stock, the Companys financial performance and other
conditions. Repurchases are also made from time-to-time in connection with the settlement of the
Companys shared-based compensation awards. Repurchases may be funded from cash flow from
operations and borrowings under the Companys Credit Agreement.
The Companys share repurchase activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Number of shares repurchased |
|
|
1,503,700 |
|
|
|
186,694 |
|
Cost of repurchased shares (in thousands): |
|
$ |
35,172 |
|
|
$ |
2,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10 Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared to $9.0 million in the prior year quarter. The effective tax rate was 29.6% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 31.1% for the same period in 2009. The decrease in the effective
tax rate was primarily due to a change in the estimated mix of pre-tax income by jurisdiction.
As of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $14.1
million and $16.6 million, respectively. The reduction is primarily attributable to the expiration
of certain statutes of limitation offset, in part, by increases to gross unrecognized tax benefits
recorded during the same period. It is reasonably possible that the gross unrecognized tax benefits
will be decreased by $0.6 million within the next 12 months due primarily to settlements of
outstanding audits. As of March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, the Company had Other liabilities of
$13.5 million and $14.5 million, respectively, related to long term uncertain tax positions.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) commenced an audit of the Companys 2007 tax year early in
2009. The audit is ongoing and the IRS has not proposed any adjustments at this time. The Company
believes that it has recorded reserves sufficient to cover exposures related to such review.
However, the resolution of such matters involves uncertainties and there are no assurances that the
ultimate resolution will not exceed the amounts we have recorded. Additionally, the results of an
audit could have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows
in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
Note 11 Derivatives and Hedging
The Company typically enters into a limited number of derivative contracts to offset the
potentially negative effects of interest rate and foreign exchange movements. The Company accounts
for its outstanding derivative contracts in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815, which requires all
derivatives, whether designated as hedges or not, to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair
value.
The following tables provide information regarding the Companys outstanding derivatives contracts
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands, except for number of outstanding
contracts):
14
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Sheet |
|
Recorded in |
|
Derivative Contract Type |
|
Contracts |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability) (4) |
|
|
Line Item |
|
OCI (5) |
|
Interest Rate Swap (1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
117,000 |
|
|
$ |
(5,764 |
) |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
(3,458 |
) |
Interest Rate Swap (2) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
(2,643 |
) |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(884 |
) |
Foreign Currency Forwards (3) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
58,500 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
280,500 |
|
|
$ |
(8,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Sheet |
|
Recorded in |
|
Derivative Contract Type |
|
Contracts |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability) (4) |
|
|
Line Item |
|
OCI (5) |
|
Interest Rate Swap (1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
126,000 |
|
|
$ |
(6,594 |
) |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
(3,956 |
) |
Interest Rate Swap (2) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
(2,769 |
) |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
Foreign Currency Forwards (3) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
117,296 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
355,796 |
|
|
$ |
(8,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company designates and accounts for this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of
debt (see Note 8 Debt). |
|
(2) |
|
Prior to September 30, 2009, the Company accounted for this interest rate swap as a cash flow
hedge of debt. On September 30, 2009, the Company discontinued hedge accounting on this
interest rate swap and as a result, the remaining unrecognized loss in OCI is being amortized
against earnings through the maturity of the previously hedged debt. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company has foreign exchange transaction risk since it typically enters into transactions
in the normal course of business that are denominated in foreign currencies that differ from
the local functional currencies in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate. The Company
may enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to offset the effects of this
foreign currency transaction risk. These contracts are normally short term in duration. Both
realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized in earnings since the Company does not
designate these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. |
|
(4) |
|
See Note 12 Fair Value Disclosures for the determination of the fair value of these
instruments. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the amount recorded in Other comprehensive income (OCI), net of tax effect. |
At March 31, 2010, the Companys derivative counterparties were all large investment grade
financial institutions. The Company did not have any collateral arrangements with its derivative
counterparties, and none of the derivative contracts contained credit-risk related contingent
features.
The following table provides information regarding gains and losses on the Companys derivative
contracts that have been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Amount recorded in: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest expense, net (1) |
|
$ |
2,443 |
|
|
$ |
1,852 |
|
Other expense (income), net (2) |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(2,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense (income), net |
|
$ |
3,169 |
|
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amounts reclassified from OCI to earnings during the period for interest rate
swap contracts. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the net amount of realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency
forward contracts. |
15
Note 12 Fair Value Disclosures
The Companys financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, fees receivable from
customers, accounts payable, and accruals which are normally short-term in nature. The Company
believes the carrying amounts of these financial instruments reasonably approximates their fair
value.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had $367.0 million of outstanding floating rate debt, which is
carried at amortized cost. The Company believes the carrying amount of the debt reasonably
approximates its fair value as the rate of interest on the term loans and revolver are floating
rate which reflect current market rates of interest for similar instruments with comparable
maturities.
FASB ASC Topic 820 provides a framework for measuring fair value and a valuation hierarchy based
upon the transparency of inputs used in the valuation of an asset or liability. Classification
within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the resulting
fair value measurement. The valuation hierarchy contains three levels:
|
|
Level 1 Valuation inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
Level 2 Valuation inputs are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets
that are not active, quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets
and other observable inputs directly or indirectly related to the asset or liability being
measured. |
|
|
Level 3 Valuation inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
The following table presents Company assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation assets (1) |
|
$ |
21,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap contracts (2) |
|
$ |
8,406 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts (3) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company has a supplemental deferred compensation arrangement for the benefit of
certain highly compensated officers, managers and other key employees. The assets consist of
investments in money market and mutual funds, and company-owned life insurance. The money
market and mutual funds consist of cash equivalents or securities traded in active markets,
which the Company considers the fair value of these assets to be based on a Level 1 input. The
value of the Company-owned life insurance is based on indirectly observable prices which the
Company considers to be Level 2 inputs. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has two interest rate swap contracts (see Note 11Derivatives and Hedging). To
determine the fair value of the swaps, the Company relies on mark-to-market valuations
prepared by third-party brokers based on observable interest rate yield curves. Accordingly,
the fair value of the swaps is determined under a Level 2 input. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company periodically enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge the
effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates (see Note 11Derivatives
and Hedging). Valuation of the foreign currency forward contracts is based on foreign currency
exchange rates in active markets; thus the Company measures the fair value of these contracts
under a Level 2 input. |
Note 13 Employee Benefits
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company has defined-benefit pension plans in several of its international locations. Benefits
paid under these plans are based on years of service and level of employee compensation. The
Company accounts for material defined benefit plans in accordance with FASB ASC Topics 715 and 960.
Net periodic pension expense was $0.4 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009. None of these plans have plan assets as defined under FASB ASC Topic 960.
Note 14 Contingencies
We are involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We
believe that the potential liability, if any, in excess of amounts already accrued from all
proceedings, claims and litigation will not have a material effect on our financial position or
results of operations when resolved in a future period.
16
The Company has various agreements that may obligate us to indemnify the other party with respect
to certain matters. Generally, these indemnification clauses are included in contracts arising in
the normal course of business under which we customarily agree to hold the other party harmless
against losses arising from a breach of representations related to such matters as title to assets
sold and licensed or certain intellectual property rights. It is not possible to predict the
maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification agreements due to the
conditional nature of the Companys obligations and the unique facts of each particular agreement.
Historically, payments made by us under these agreements have not been material. As of March 31,
2010, the Company did not have any indemnification agreements that would require material payments.
Note 15 Subsequent Event
Our corporate headquarters is located in approximately 213,000 square feet of leased office space
in three buildings located in Stamford, Connecticut. Our Stamford facility accommodates research
and analysis, marketing, sales, client support, production, corporate services, executive offices,
and administration. The lease for the Stamford facility was scheduled to expire in October 2010.
On April 16, 2010, the Company entered into an amended and restated lease agreement (the 2010
Lease) to renew the lease on the Stamford headquarters facility. Under the terms of the 2010
Lease, the landlord will provide up to $25.0 million to be used to renovate the three buildings and
the parking areas comprising the facility. The 2010 Lease provides for a term of fifteen years,
which commences after the earlier of the completion of all of the renovations or June 1, 2012.
17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The purpose of the following Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is to help facilitate
the understanding of significant factors influencing the quarterly operating results, financial
condition and cash flows of Gartner, Inc. Additionally, the MD&A also conveys our expectations of
the potential impact of known trends, events or uncertainties that may impact future results. You
should read this discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and
related notes included in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Historical results and percentage relationships are not necessarily indicative
of operating results for future periods. References to the Company, we, our, and us in this
MD&A are to Gartner, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
As
previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, in
December 2009 we acquired AMR Research, Inc. (AMR Research), and Burton Group, Inc. (Burton
Group). As a result, the MD&A disclosures herein include the operating results and business
measurements of these acquired businesses for the three months ended March 31, 2010, but excludes
them for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are any statements other
than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding our expectations, beliefs,
hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In some cases, forward-looking statements can
be identified by the use of words such as may, will, expects, should, believes, plans,
anticipates, estimates, predicts, potential, continue, or other words of similar meaning.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those discussed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements.
Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in
Factors That May Affect Future Performance and elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Readers should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which reflect managements opinion only as of the date on which they
were made. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to review or update these
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances as they occur. Readers also should
review carefully any risk factors described in other reports filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Gartner, Inc. is the worlds leading information technology research and advisory company that
helps executives use technology to build, guide and grow their enterprises. We offer independent
and objective research and analysis on the information technology, computer hardware, software,
communications and related technology industries. We provide comprehensive coverage of the IT
industry to approximately 10,000 client organizations, including approximately 400 of the Fortune
500 companies, across 80 countries. Our client base consists primarily of CIOs and other senior IT
and executives from a wide variety of business enterprises, government agencies and the investment
community.
We have three business segments: Research, Consulting and Events.
|
|
Research provides insight for CIOs, other IT executives and professionals, business leaders,
technology companies and the investment community through research reports and briefings,
access to our analysts, as well as peer networking services and membership programs. |
|
|
Consulting consists primarily of client engagements that utilize our research insight,
benchmarking data, problem-solving methodologies and hands on experience to improve the return
on an organizations IT investment through assessments of cost, performance, efficiency and
quality. |
|
|
Events consists of various symposia, summits, and conferences focused on the IT industry as a
whole, as well as IT applicable to particular industries and particular roles within an
organization. |
18
BUSINESS MEASUREMENTS
We believe the following business measurements are important performance indicators for our
business segments:
|
|
|
BUSINESS SEGMENT |
|
BUSINESS MEASUREMENTS |
Research
|
|
Contract value represents the value attributable to all of our subscription-related
research products that recognize revenue on a ratable basis. Contract value is calculated
as the annualized value of all subscription research contracts in effect at a specific
point in time, without regard to the duration of the contract. |
|
|
|
|
|
Client retention rate represents a measure of client satisfaction and renewed business
relationships at a specific point in time. Client retention is calculated on a percentage
basis by dividing our current clients, who were also clients a year ago, by all clients
from a year ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wallet retention rate represents a measure of the amount of contract value we have
retained with clients over a twelve-month period. Wallet retention is calculated on a
percentage basis by dividing the contract value of clients, who were clients one year
earlier, by the total contract value from a year earlier, excluding the impact of foreign
currency exchange. When wallet retention exceeds client retention, it is an indication of
retention of higher-spending clients, or increased spending by retained clients, or both. |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of executive program members represents the number of paid participants in
executive programs. |
|
|
|
Consulting
|
|
Consulting backlog represents future revenue to be derived from in-process consulting,
measurement and strategic advisory services engagements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization rates represent a measure of productivity of our consultants. Utilization
rates are calculated for billable headcount on a percentage basis by dividing total hours
billed by total hours available to bill. |
|
|
|
|
|
Billing Rate represents earned billable revenue divided by total billable hours. |
|
|
|
|
|
Average annualized revenue per billable headcount represents a measure of the revenue
generating ability of an average billable consultant and is calculated periodically by
multiplying the average billing rate per hour times the utilization percentage times the
billable hours available for one year. |
|
|
|
Events
|
|
Number of events represents the total number of hosted events completed during the period. |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of attendees represents the number of people who attend events. |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL POSITION
The cornerstones of our strategy are to focus on producing extraordinary research content, deliver
innovative and highly differentiated product offerings, enhance our sales capability, provide world
class client service, and improve our operational effectiveness.
We had total revenues of $295.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of
8%, or $22.3 million, compared to the prior year quarter. Revenues increased in our Research and
Consulting segments but declined in Events. Excluding the impact of foreign currency translation,
total revenues were up about 4%. We had net income of $19.4 million in the first quarter of 2010, a
decrease of 3% from the prior year quarter. Diluted earnings per share was $0.19 per share in the
first quarter of 2010 compared to $0.21 in the prior year quarter.
Research revenues were up 12% quarter-over-quarter, to $210.7 million in the first quarter of 2010
from $187.7 million in the prior year quarter. The contribution margin was 66% for both periods. At
March 31, 2010, Research contract value was over $864.0 million, an increase of 14% over March 31,
2009, with approximately half of the increase due to the acquisitions of AMR Research and Burton
Group. Client retention was 80% and wallet retention was 89% at March 31, 2010.
Consulting revenues increased 2% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the prior
year quarter, despite a 6% decline in billable headcount. The segment contribution margin improved
by 2 points. Consultant utilization was 72% for both the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
Events revenues decreased 13% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the prior year quarter. The
decline was primarily due to timing as we held 9 events in
the first quarter of 2010 and 12 in the first quarter of 2009. We
19
held 7 on-going events in both quarters, with increased attendees and exhibitors in the 2010
quarter. The quarter-over-quarter segment contribution margin improved by 8 points, mostly due to
higher revenues and reduced expenses at our on-going events.
For a more detailed discussion of our segment results, see Segment Results below.
Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $105.9 million as of March 31, 2010 and we had $118.6 million
of available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility. We believe we have a strong
cash position and adequate borrowing capacity.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements requires the application of appropriate accounting policies
and the use of estimates. The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical
to an understanding of Gartners financial statements because their application requires complex
and subjective management judgments and estimates. Risks related to these critical accounting
policies are described below.
Revenue recognition We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB 101), and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
104, Revenue Recognition (SAB 104). Once all required criteria for revenue recognition have been
met, revenue by significant source is accounted for as follows:
|
|
|
Research revenues are derived from subscription contracts for research products and
are deferred and recognized ratably over the applicable contract term. Fees from research
reprints are recognized when the reprint is shipped. |
|
|
|
|
Consulting revenues are principally generated from fixed fee and time and material
engagements. Revenues from fixed fee contracts are recognized on a percentage of
completion basis. Revenues from time and materials engagements are recognized as work is
delivered and/or services are provided. Revenues related to contract optimization
contracts are contingent in nature and are only recognized upon satisfaction of all
conditions related to their payment. |
|
|
|
|
Events revenues are deferred and recognized upon the completion of the related
symposium, conference or exhibition. |
The majority of research contracts are billable upon signing, absent special terms granted on a
limited basis from time to time. All research contracts are non-cancelable and non-refundable,
except for government contracts that may have cancellation or fiscal funding clauses, which have
not produced material cancellations to date. It is our policy to record the entire amount of the
contract that is billable as a fee receivable at the time the contract is signed with a
corresponding amount as deferred revenue, since the contract represents a legally enforceable
claim.
For those government contracts that permit termination, we bill the client the full amount billable
under the contract but only record a receivable equal to the earned portion of the contract. In
addition, we only record deferred revenue on these government contracts when cash is received.
Deferred revenues attributable to government contracts were $68.9 million and $65.3 million at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In addition, at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, we had not recognized uncollected receivables or deferred revenues relating to government
contracts that permit termination of $6.6 million and $8.3 million, respectively.
Uncollectible fees receivable The allowance for losses is composed of a bad debt and a sales
reserve. Provisions are charged against earnings, either as a reduction in revenues or an increase
to expense. The measurement of likely and probable losses and the allowance for losses is based on
historical loss experience, aging of outstanding receivables, an assessment of current economic
conditions and the financial health of specific clients. This evaluation is inherently judgmental
and requires material estimates. These valuation reserves are periodically re-evaluated and
adjusted as more information about the ultimate collectibility of fees receivable becomes
available. Circumstances that could cause our valuation reserves to increase include changes in our
clients liquidity and credit quality, other factors negatively impacting our clients ability to
pay their obligations as they come due, and the effectiveness of our collection efforts. The
following table provides our total fees receivable, along with the related allowance for losses (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total fees receivable |
|
$ |
311,365 |
|
|
$ |
325,698 |
|
Allowance for losses |
|
|
(8,200 |
) |
|
|
(8,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees receivable, net |
|
$ |
303,165 |
|
|
$ |
317,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets The evaluation of goodwill is performed in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 350, which requires goodwill to be assessed for impairment at least annually and whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In
addition, an impairment evaluation of our amortizable intangible assets is performed on a periodic
basis.
Our annual goodwill assessment requires us to estimate the fair values of our reporting units based
on estimates of future business operations and market and economic conditions in developing
long-term forecasts. If we determine that the fair value of any reporting unit is less than its
carrying amount, we must recognize an impairment charge for a portion of the associated goodwill of
that reporting unit against earnings in our financial statements.
Factors we consider important that could trigger a review for impairment include the following:
|
|
Significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating results; |
|
|
|
Significant changes in the manner of our use of acquired assets or the strategy for our
overall business; |
|
|
|
Significant negative industry or economic trends; |
|
|
|
Significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and |
|
|
|
Our market capitalization relative to net book value. |
Due to the numerous variables associated with our judgments and assumptions relating to the
valuation of the reporting units and the effects of changes in circumstances affecting these
valuations, both the precision and reliability of the resulting estimates are subject to
uncertainty, and as additional information becomes known, we may change our estimates.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment testing in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and
concluded that the fair values of each of the Companys reporting units substantially exceeded
their respective carrying values.
Accounting for income taxes As we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we estimate our
income taxes in each of the jurisdictions where we operate. This process involves estimating our
current tax expense together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets
and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheets. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets when future realization is in question. We consider the
availability of loss carryforwards, existing deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income and
ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation
allowance. In the event we determine that we are able to realize our deferred tax assets in the
future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment is made to reduce the valuation
allowance and increase income in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if we determine
that we will not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an
adjustment to the valuation allowance is charged against income in the period such determination is
made.
Accounting for stock-based compensation The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in
accordance with FASB ASC Topics 505 and 718, as interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins No.
107 (SAB No. 107) and No. 110 (SAB No. 110). The Company recognizes stock-based compensation
expense, which is based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant, over the related
service period, net of estimated forfeitures (see Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation in the Notes
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock compensation
awards requires the input of certain highly complex and subjective assumptions, including the
expected life of the stock compensation awards and the Companys Common Stock price volatility. In
addition, determining the appropriate amount of associated periodic expense requires management to
estimate the rate of employee forfeitures and the likelihood of achievement of certain performance
targets. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock compensation awards and the
associated periodic expense represent managements best estimates, but these estimates involve
inherent uncertainties and the application of judgment. As a result, if factors change and the
Company deems it necessary in the future to modify the assumptions it made or to use different
assumptions, or if the quantity and nature of the
21
Companys stock-based compensation awards changes, then the amount of expense may need to be
adjusted and future stock compensation expense could be materially different from what has been
recorded in the current period.
Restructuring and other accruals We may record accruals for severance costs, costs associated
with excess facilities that we have leased, contract terminations, asset impairments, and other
items as a result of on-going actions we undertake to streamline our organization, reposition
certain businesses and reduce ongoing costs. Estimates of costs to be incurred to complete these
actions, such as future lease payments, sublease income, the fair value of assets, and severance
and related benefits, are based on assumptions at the time the actions are initiated. These
accruals may need to be adjusted to the extent actual costs differ from such estimates. In
addition, these actions may be revised due to changes in business conditions that we did not
foresee at the time such plans were approved.
We also record accruals during the year for our various employee cash incentive programs. Amounts
accrued at the end of each reporting period are based on our estimates and may require adjustment
as the ultimate amount paid for these incentives are sometimes not known with certainty until after
year end.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overall Results
The following table summarizes the changes in selected line items in our interim Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operation for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
In $ |
|
|
In % |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
295,833 |
|
|
$ |
273,533 |
|
|
$ |
22,300 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services & product development |
|
|
123,046 |
|
|
|
116,644 |
|
|
|
(6,402 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
130,568 |
|
|
|
115,564 |
|
|
|
(15,004 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Depreciation |
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
|
|
>(100 |
)% |
Acquisition & integration charges |
|
|
3,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,511 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
29,198 |
|
|
|
34,451 |
|
|
|
(5,253 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(3,384 |
) |
|
|
(4,180 |
) |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
>100 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,163 |
|
|
|
9,029 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,403 |
|
|
$ |
19,996 |
|
|
$ |
(593 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the operating results of AMR Research and Burton Group, which we acquired in
December 2009. |
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010, increased $22.3 million, or 8%,
compared to the same period in 2009. Revenues increased in our Research and Consulting segments but
declined in Events. Excluding the positive impact of foreign currency, total revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 were up about 4% over the prior year quarter. Of the $22.3 million
revenue increase, approximately $11.8 million was attributable to the acquired businesses of AMR
Research and Burton Group.
Please refer to the section of this MD&A below entitled Segment Results for a further discussion
of revenues and results by segment.
Cost of services and product development was 5% higher quarter-over-quarter, or $6.4
million, with about $4.5 million of the increase due to unfavorable foreign currency impact. The
remaining increase was primarily due to increased payroll costs, to include the additional
headcount related to the AMR Research and Burton Group businesses, and higher charges for
stock-based
22
compensation. Somewhat offsetting these increases were lower conference expenses due to
changes in our events calendar. Cost of services and product development as a percentage of sales
decreased by 1 point, to 42% from 43%, due to improved contribution margins in our Consulting and
Events segments.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) was $15.0 million higher
quarter-over-quarter, or 13%. The unfavorable impact of foreign currency translation increased
expense by about $4.6 million. We also had approximately $11.6 million of higher sales commissions,
payroll, and other personnel charges, which includes additional headcount costs due to the AMR
Research and Burton Group acquisitions, as well as higher stock-based compensation expense.
Somewhat offsetting these increases were $1.2 million in reduced charges for severance, recruiting,
and other items.
Depreciation expense increased 2% quarter-over-quarter. Capital spending was $3.4 million
in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $4.5 million in the same period in 2009, a 25% decline.
Amortization of intangibles was $2.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to $0.4 million in the same period in 2009. The increase was due to the intangibles
recorded related to the acquisitions of AMR Research and Burton Group in December 2009.
Acquisition and Integration Charges was $3.5 million in the three months ended March 31,
2010. These charges relate to the acquisitions of AMR Research and Burton Group in December 2009,
and include legal, consulting, severance, and other costs.
Operating
Income decreased 15% quarter-over-quarter, to $29.2 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to $34.5 million the same period in the prior year. Operating income
as a percentage of revenues declined 3 points quarter-over-quarter, primarily due to higher SG&A
charges, as well as additional intangible amortization and the acquisition and integration charges
related to the AMR Research and Burton Group acquisitions.
Please refer to the section of this MD&A entitled Segment Results below for a further discussion
of revenues and results by segment.
Interest Expense, Net declined 19% quarter-over-quarter. The decline was mostly due to a
reduction in the weighted-average amount of debt outstanding.
Other Income (Expense), Net for the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily consisted
of a $2.4 million gain due to an insurance recovery of a prior period loss, partially offset by
$0.6 million in net foreign currency exchange losses.
Provision
For Income Taxes was $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared to $9.0 million in the prior year quarter. The effective tax rate was 29.6% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 31.1% for the same period in 2009. The decrease in the effective
tax rate was primarily due to a change in the estimated mix of pre-tax income by jurisdiction.
Net
Income was $19.4 million and $20.0 million for the three months ending March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. Basic earnings per share declared $0.01 per
share, while
diluted earnings per share was down by $0.02 per share
quarter-over-quarter due to lower net income and a higher number
of diluted shares in the first quarter of 2010.
SEGMENT RESULTS
We evaluate reportable segment performance and allocate resources based on gross contribution
margin. Gross contribution is defined as operating income excluding certain Cost of services and
product development charges, SG&A expenses, Depreciation, Amortization of intangibles, Acquisition
and integration charges, and Other charges. Gross contribution margin is defined as gross
contribution as a percentage of revenues.
23
The following sections present the results of our three segments:
Research
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Of And |
|
|
As Of And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The |
|
|
For The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
Financial Measurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (2) |
|
$ |
210,673 |
|
|
$ |
187,688 |
|
|
$ |
22,985 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Gross contribution (2) |
|
$ |
138,735 |
|
|
$ |
124,731 |
|
|
$ |
14,004 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Gross contribution margin |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Measurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract value (2) |
|
$ |
864,428 |
|
|
$ |
760,704 |
|
|
$ |
103,724 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Client retention |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallet retention |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
(1) point |
|
|
|
|
Exec. program members |
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes AMR Research and Burton Group, which we acquired in December 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollars in thousands. |
Research revenues increased 12% on a quarter-over-quarter basis and excluding the favorable effect
of foreign currency translation, revenues were up about 8%. Slightly less than half of the $23.0
million revenue increase was attributable to the AMR Research and Burton Group businesses. The
segment gross contribution margin was flat quarter-over-quarter, at 66%.
Research contract value increased $103.7 million compared to the prior year, but excluding the
impact of foreign currency translation, research contract value was up about 10%. Approximately
half of the increase in contract value was attributable to the AMR Research and Burton Group
businesses.
Consulting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Of And |
|
|
As Of And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The |
|
|
For The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
Financial Measurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (2) |
|
$ |
71,639 |
|
|
$ |
70,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Gross contribution (2) |
|
$ |
28,422 |
|
|
$ |
27,020 |
|
|
$ |
1,402 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Gross contribution margin |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
2 points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Measurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog (2) |
|
$ |
89,091 |
|
|
$ |
86,657 |
|
|
$ |
2,434 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Billable headcount |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Consultant utilization |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annualized revenue per billable headcount (2) |
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes AMR Research and Burton Group, which we acquired in December 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollars in thousands. |
The quarter-over-quarter revenue increase was due to higher revenues in our core consulting and
strategic advisory services (SAS) businesses, which was slightly offset by lower revenues in our
contract optimization business. Consulting revenues decreased about 2% quarter-over-quarter
adjusted for foreign currency impact. The revenue contributions from AMR Research and Burton Group
in the three months ended March 31, 2010, were not significant.
Excluding the favorable impact from foreign currency translation, core consulting revenues were
down slightly versus the prior year, principally due to lower billable headcount which was
partially offset by improved billing rates. The reduction in revenues in our contract optimization
business reflects a stronger than usual quarter for this business in the 2009 quarter.
The gross contribution margin improved by 2 points quarter-over-quarter due to the higher billing
rate in core consulting and additional SAS days fulfilled.
24
Events
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Of And |
|
|
As Of And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The |
|
|
For The |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2010 (1) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
Financial Measurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues (2) |
|
$ |
13,521 |
|
|
$ |
15,526 |
|
|
$ |
(2,005 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Gross contribution (2) |
|
$ |
5,215 |
|
|
$ |
4,783 |
|
|
$ |
432 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Gross contribution margin |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
8 points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Measurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of events |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
Number of attendees |
|
|
3,374 |
|
|
|
3,883 |
|
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes AMR Research and Burton Group, which we acquired in December 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Dollars in thousands. |
Events revenues declined 13% quarter-over-quarter but excluding the favorable impact of foreign
currency translation, revenues were down about 17%.
The
revenue decrease was primarily due to the timing of our events
calendar and to a lesser extent, the impact of
discontinued events. We held 9 events in the three months ended March 31, 2010, consisting of 7
on-going events and 2 events moved in to the quarter. Two events that had been held in the first
quarter of 2009 were discontinued and 3 others were moved to another quarter in 2010. Partially
offsetting the revenue decline due to timing and discontinued events was a $0.6 million increase in
revenue from our 7 on-going events, with the number of attendees up 2% and the number of exhibitors
up 5%. We had higher average attendee revenue but flat average exhibitor revenue from these
on-going events in the 2010 quarter.
The gross contribution margin was up 8 points quarter-over-quarter, due to higher revenue and
reduced expenses at our on-going events and to a lesser extent, the discontinuing of lower margin
events.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We finance our operations primarily through cash generated from our on-going operating activities.
As of March 31, 2010, we had $105.9 million of cash and cash equivalents and $118.6 million of
available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility (not including the $100.0 million
expansion feature). Our cash and cash equivalents are held in numerous locations throughout the
world, with approximately 92% held outside the United States as of March 31, 2010.
We believe that the cash we expect to earn from our on-going operating activities, our existing
cash balances, and the borrowing capacity we have under our revolving credit facility will be
sufficient for our expected short-term and foreseeable long-term operating needs.
The following table summarizes the changes in the Companys cash and cash equivalents (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(7,966 |
) |
|
$ |
14,827 |
|
|
$ |
(22,793 |
) |
Cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(15,108 |
) |
|
|
(4,536 |
) |
|
|
(10,572 |
) |
Cash provided (used) in financing activities |
|
|
14,730 |
|
|
|
(79,506 |
) |
|
|
94,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase |
|
|
(8,344 |
) |
|
|
(69,215 |
) |
|
|
60,871 |
|
Effects of exchange rates |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
(1,451 |
) |
|
|
(866 |
) |
Beginning cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
116,574 |
|
|
|
140,929 |
|
|
|
(24,355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
105,913 |
|
|
$ |
70,263 |
|
|
$ |
35,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Operating
While net income was down slightly quarter-over-quarter, our operating cash flow decreased by $22.8
million, due to several factors. We had $12.0 million in higher commission and incentive payments,
due to our strong sales performance in the fourth quarter of 2009, as well as higher payables of
$6.5 million, which was timing related. We also paid
approximately $3.5 million in acquisition and integration payments related to the acquisitions of AMR Research and Burton Group which closed in
December 2009, and we had a decline of about $9.0 million in our other working capital accounts.
Somewhat offsetting these declines were $2.4 million in cash we received from an insurance recovery
and approximately $5.8 million in lower cash payments for severance, interest, and taxes.
Investing
We used an additional $10.6 million of cash in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to
the prior year quarter, due to $11.7 million of cash paid in
the first quarter of 2010 related to the
acquisition of Burton Group in December 2009. We used $3.4 million of cash for capital expenditures
in 2010 compared to $4.5 million in 2009.
Financing
Cash provided from our financing activities was $14.7 million in the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to cash used of $79.5 million in the prior year quarter. On a net basis, we borrowed
an additional $38.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to payments of $78.3
million in the prior year quarter. We also realized $11.9 million from option exercises and excess
tax benefits in the 2010 period compared to $0.9 million in the 2009 period. We used an additional
$33.0 million for share repurchases in 2010, with $35.2 million used in the first quarter of 2010
compared to $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2009.
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
Credit Agreement
At March 31, 2010, we had $367.0 million outstanding under our Credit Agreement, which includes two
amortizing term loans and a $300.0 million revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility
may be increased up to an additional $100.0 million at our lenders discretion (the expansion
feature), for a total revolving credit facility of $400.0 million. However, the $100.0 million
expansion feature may or may not be available to us depending upon prevailing credit market
conditions.
The term loans are being repaid in consecutive quarterly installments plus a final payment due on
January 31, 2012, and may be prepaid at any time without penalty or premium at our option. The
revolving loans may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed until January 31, 2012, at which time all
amounts borrowed must be repaid. See Note 8 Debt in the accompanying Notes to the interim
condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Companys
Credit Agreement.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Through March 31, 2010, we have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements or transactions
with unconsolidated entities or other persons.
Stamford Headquarters Lease Renewal
Our corporate headquarters is located in approximately 213,000 square feet of leased office space
in three buildings located in Stamford, Connecticut. Our Stamford facility accommodates research
and analysis, marketing, sales, client support, production, corporate services, executive offices,
and administration. The lease for the Stamford facility was scheduled to expire in October 2010.
On April 16, 2010, the Company entered into an amended and restated lease agreement (the 2010
Lease) to renew the lease on the Stamford headquarters facility. Under the terms of the 2010
Lease, the landlord will provide up to $25.0 million to be used to renovate the three buildings and
the parking areas comprising the facility. The 2010 Lease provides for a term of fifteen years,
which commences after the earlier of the completion of all of the renovations or June 1, 2012.
BUSINESS AND TRENDS
Our quarterly and annual revenue, operating income, and cash flow fluctuate as a result of many
factors, including: the timing of our Symposium/ITxpo series that normally occurs during the fourth
calendar quarter, and other events; the amount of new business generated; the mix of domestic and
international business; changes in market demand for our products and services; changes in foreign
currency rates; the timing of the development, introduction and marketing of new products and
services; competition in the industry; and other factors. The potential fluctuations in our
operating income could cause period-to-period comparisons of operating results not to be meaningful
and could provide an unreliable indication of future operating results.
26
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE PERFORMANCE
We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and
uncertainties, some of which are
beyond our control. A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included
under Risk Factors contained in Item 1A. of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K which is
incorporated herein by reference.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In September 2009, the FASB ratified ASC Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-14, Certain Revenue
Arrangements That Include Software Elements. Under ASU 2009-14, all tangible products containing
both software and non-software components, that function together to deliver the products
essential functionality, will no longer be within the scope of rules governing Software revenue
recognition (formerly known as SOP 97-2). This means that entities that sell joint hardware and
software products that meet the scope exception (i.e., essential functionality) will be required to
follow the guidance in ASU 2009-13 below. The Update provides a list of items to consider when
determining whether the software and non-software components function together to deliver a
products essential functionality. We are currently evaluating the impact of this Update but do not
believe it will have any significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB ratified ASU 2009-13, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. ASU 2009-13 requires companies to allocate revenue in arrangements involving
multiple deliverables based on the estimated selling price of each deliverable, even though such
deliverables are not sold separately either by the company itself or other vendors. ASU 2009-13
eliminates the requirement that all undelivered elements must have objective and reliable evidence
of fair value before a company can recognize the portion of the overall arrangement fee that is
attributable to items that already have been delivered. As a result, the new guidance is expected
to allow some companies to recognize revenue on transactions that involve multiple deliverables
earlier than under current requirements. ASU 2009-13 will be effective for Gartner beginning in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2012. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the
impact of this Update but do not believe it will have any significant impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to changes in interest rates arising from the $187.0 million outstanding on our
two term loans and $180.0 million outstanding on our revolver as of March 31, 2010. All of these
borrowings are floating rate, which may be either prime-based or LIBOR-based. Interest rates under
these borrowings include a base rate plus a margin currently between 0.00% and 0.75% on prime
borrowings and between .625% and 1.75% on LIBOR-based borrowings.
As of March 31, 2010, the annualized interest rates on the original term loan, the 2008 term loan,
and the revolver were 1.18%, 1.55%, and 1.15%, respectively. The rates on the original and 2008
term loans consisted of a three-month LIBOR base rate plus margins of 0.88% and 1.25%,
respectively. The rate on the revolver consisted of a LIBOR base rate plus a margin of 0.88%.
We have an interest rate swap contract which effectively converts the floating base rate on the
original term loan to a fixed rate. As a result, our exposure to interest rate risk on the original
term loan is capped. Including the effect of the interest rate swap, the annualized interest rate
on the original term loan was 5.94% as of March 31, 2010.
The Company does not hedge the interest rate risk on the 2008 term loan and the revolver.
Accordingly, we are exposed to interest rate risk on this debt. A 25 basis point increase or
decrease in interest rates would change pre-tax annual interest expense on the $300.0 million
revolver and the $70.0 million currently outstanding on the 2008 term loan by approximately $0.9
million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We have clients in 80 countries and as a result we conduct business in numerous currencies other
than the U.S dollar. Among the major foreign currencies in which we conduct business are the Euro,
the British Pound, the Japanese Yen, the Australian dollar, and the Canadian dollar. Our foreign
currency exposure results in both translation risk and transaction risk:
27
Translation Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency translation risk since the functional currencies of our foreign
operations are generally denominated in the local currency. Translation risk arises since the
assets and liabilities that we report for our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars
at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and these exchange rates fluctuate over
time.
These foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred and are recorded as a component of
stockholders equity and do not impact our operating results.
A measure of the potential impact of foreign currency translation on our Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets can be determined through a sensitivity analysis of our cash and cash equivalents.
As of March 31, 2010, we had $105.9 million of cash and cash equivalents, a substantial portion of
which was denominated in foreign currencies. If foreign exchange rates in comparison to the U.S.
dollar changed by 10%, the amount of cash and cash equivalents we would have reported on March 31,
2010, would have increased or decreased by approximately $6.0 million.
Our foreign subsidiaries generally operate in a local functional currency that differs from the
U.S. dollar. Revenues and expenses in these foreign currencies translate into higher or lower
revenues and expenses in U.S. dollars as the U.S. dollar continuously weakens or strengthens
against these other currencies. Therefore, changes in exchange rates may affect our consolidated
revenues and expenses (as expressed in U.S. dollars) from foreign operations. Historically, this
impact on our consolidated earnings has not been material since foreign currency movements in the
major currencies in which we operate tend to impact our revenues and expenses fairly equally.
Translation Risk
We also have foreign exchange transaction risk since we typically enter into transactions in the
normal course of business that are denominated in foreign currencies that differ from local
functional currencies in which the foreign subsidiaries operate.
We typically enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to offset the effects of this
foreign currency transaction risk. These contracts are normally short term in duration. Unrealized
and realized gains and losses are recognized in earnings. At March 31, 2010, we had 14 foreign
currency forward contracts outstanding with a total notional amount of $58.5 million and a net
unrealized loss of approximately $0.2 million. All of these contracts matured by the end of April
2010.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist
primarily of short-term, highly liquid investments classified as cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, and interest rate swap contracts. The majority of the Companys cash equivalent
investments and its two interest rate swap contracts are with investment grade commercial banks
that are participants in the Companys Credit Agreement. Accounts receivable balances deemed to be
collectible from customers have limited concentration of credit risk due to our diverse customer
base and geographic dispersion.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the
information we are required to disclose in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.
Specifically, these controls and procedures ensure that the information is accumulated and
communicated to our executive management team, including our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
28
Management conducted an evaluation, as of March 31, 2010, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, under the supervision and with the
participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon that
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to
material Company information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Act.
In addition, there have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in legal and administrative proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. We believe that the potential liability, if any, in excess of amounts already
accrued from all proceedings, claims and litigation will not have a material effect on our
financial position or results of operations when resolved in a future period.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
A description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under Risk Factors
contained in Item 1A. of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by this report.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company has a $250.0 million authorized stock repurchase program, of which $43.5 million
remained available as of March 31, 2010. The following table provides detail related to repurchases
of our common stock for treasury in the three months ended March 31, 2010 under this program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares that may |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under our Share |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Repurchase |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Program |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
$ |
21.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
February |
|
|
949,467 |
|
|
|
22.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
551,942 |
|
|
|
24.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,503,700 |
|
|
$ |
23.39 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT |
31.1
|
|
Certification of chief executive officer under Rule 13a 14(a)/15d 14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of chief financial officer under Rule 13a 14(a)/15d 14(a). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification under 18 U.S.C. 1350. |
Items 3, 4, and 5 of Part II are not applicable and have been omitted.
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gartner, Inc.
|
|
Date May 5, 2010 |
/s/ Christopher J. Lafond
|
|
|
Christopher J. Lafond |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
30