e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-21923
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Illinois
|
|
36-3873352 |
|
|
|
(State of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
727 North Bank Lane
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045
(Address of principal executive offices)
(847) 615-4096
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock no par value, 24,163,068 shares, as of November 5, 2009
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
128,898 |
|
|
$ |
219,794 |
|
|
$ |
158,201 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
22,863 |
|
|
|
226,110 |
|
|
|
35,181 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
1,168,362 |
|
|
|
123,009 |
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
Available-for-sale securities, at fair value |
|
|
1,434,248 |
|
|
|
784,673 |
|
|
|
1,469,500 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
29,204 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
2,243 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
19,441 |
|
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
19,436 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
187,505 |
|
|
|
51,029 |
|
|
|
63,570 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
10,087 |
|
|
|
4,828 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
8,275,257 |
|
|
|
7,621,069 |
|
|
|
7,322,545 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
95,096 |
|
|
|
69,767 |
|
|
|
66,327 |
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
8,180,161 |
|
|
|
7,551,302 |
|
|
|
7,256,218 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
352,890 |
|
|
|
349,875 |
|
|
|
349,388 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
315,806 |
|
|
|
240,664 |
|
|
|
209,970 |
|
Trade date securities receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
788,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
276,525 |
|
|
|
276,310 |
|
|
|
276,310 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
14,368 |
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
|
|
15,389 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,136,021 |
|
|
$ |
10,658,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,864,920 |
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
841,668 |
|
|
$ |
757,844 |
|
|
$ |
717,587 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
9,005,495 |
|
|
|
7,618,906 |
|
|
|
7,111,940 |
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
9,847,163 |
|
|
|
8,376,750 |
|
|
|
7,829,527 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
42,025 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
433,983 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
438,983 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
252,071 |
|
|
|
336,764 |
|
|
|
296,391 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,515 |
|
|
|
249,537 |
|
Trade date securities payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
181,229 |
|
|
|
121,744 |
|
|
|
122,126 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
11,029,939 |
|
|
|
9,591,754 |
|
|
|
9,055,589 |
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A $1,000 liquidation value; 50,000 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
49,379 |
|
|
|
49,379 |
|
|
|
49,379 |
|
Series B $1,000 liquidation value; 250,000 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; no
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
234,682 |
|
|
|
232,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value; $1.00 stated value; 60,000,000 shares
authorized; 26,965,411, 26,610,714 and 26,547,839 shares issued
at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008,
respectively |
|
|
26,965 |
|
|
|
26,611 |
|
|
|
26,548 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
580,988 |
|
|
|
571,887 |
|
|
|
551,453 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,862,343 at September 30, 2009 and
2,854,040 shares at December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 |
|
|
(122,437 |
) |
|
|
(122,290 |
) |
|
|
(122,290 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
342,873 |
|
|
|
318,793 |
|
|
|
318,066 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(6,368 |
) |
|
|
(10,302 |
) |
|
|
(13,825 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,106,082 |
|
|
|
1,066,572 |
|
|
|
809,331 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
12,136,021 |
|
|
$ |
10,658,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,864,920 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
1
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
126,448 |
|
|
$ |
108,495 |
|
|
$ |
343,637 |
|
|
$ |
336,251 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
Securities |
|
|
14,106 |
|
|
|
17,599 |
|
|
|
44,252 |
|
|
|
50,233 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
141,577 |
|
|
|
126,569 |
|
|
|
390,785 |
|
|
|
388,905 |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
42,806 |
|
|
|
53,405 |
|
|
|
132,261 |
|
|
|
168,697 |
|
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
13,696 |
|
Interest on notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
Interest on subordinated notes |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
Interest on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
13,643 |
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
53,914 |
|
|
|
65,889 |
|
|
|
165,843 |
|
|
|
207,083 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
87,663 |
|
|
|
60,680 |
|
|
|
224,942 |
|
|
|
181,822 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
91,193 |
|
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
129,329 |
|
|
|
42,985 |
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
|
36,551 |
|
|
|
95,613 |
|
|
|
138,837 |
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management |
|
|
7,501 |
|
|
|
7,044 |
|
|
|
20,310 |
|
|
|
22,680 |
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
13,204 |
|
|
|
4,488 |
|
|
|
52,032 |
|
|
|
18,120 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
(Losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
113,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
10,249 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
34,318 |
|
|
|
30,283 |
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
150,680 |
|
|
|
22,130 |
|
|
|
232,559 |
|
|
|
80,305 |
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
48,088 |
|
|
|
35,823 |
|
|
|
138,923 |
|
|
|
109,471 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
12,025 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
5,666 |
|
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
16,971 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
9,578 |
|
|
|
8,566 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
3,709 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
Other |
|
|
25,042 |
|
|
|
10,491 |
|
|
|
59,679 |
|
|
|
31,648 |
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
92,563 |
|
|
|
63,199 |
|
|
|
253,770 |
|
|
|
191,228 |
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
54,587 |
|
|
|
(4,518 |
) |
|
|
74,402 |
|
|
|
27,914 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
22,592 |
|
|
|
(2,070 |
) |
|
|
29,500 |
|
|
|
9,381 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
31,995 |
|
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
44,902 |
|
|
|
18,533 |
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
14,668 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares |
|
$ |
27,327 |
|
|
$ |
(2,992 |
) |
|
$ |
30,234 |
|
|
$ |
17,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share Basic |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
24,052 |
|
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
23,958 |
|
|
|
23,590 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
Average common shares and dilutive common shares |
|
|
26,545 |
|
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
24,115 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,281 |
|
|
$ |
539,586 |
|
|
$ |
(122,196 |
) |
|
$ |
309,556 |
|
|
$ |
(13,672 |
) |
|
$ |
739,555 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,533 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities, net of
reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for split-dollar life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(992 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
49,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,379 |
|
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,089 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
818 |
|
Director compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
49,379 |
|
|
$ |
26,548 |
|
|
$ |
551,453 |
|
|
$ |
(122,290 |
) |
|
$ |
318,066 |
|
|
$ |
(13,825 |
) |
|
$ |
809,331 |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
281,873 |
|
|
$ |
26,611 |
|
|
$ |
571,887 |
|
|
$ |
(122,290 |
) |
|
$ |
318,793 |
|
|
$ |
(10,302 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066,572 |
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,902 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities, net of
reclassification adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,463 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,480 |
) |
Accretion on preferred stock |
|
|
2,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,132 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for other-than-temporary impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691 |
|
Director compensation plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
284,061 |
|
|
$ |
26,965 |
|
|
$ |
580,988 |
|
|
$ |
(122,437 |
) |
|
$ |
342,873 |
|
|
$ |
(6,368 |
) |
|
$ |
1,106,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net |
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
|
$ |
(1,246 |
) |
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments arising during the period, net |
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
Less: Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,243 |
|
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
44,902 |
|
|
$ |
18,533 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
129,329 |
|
|
|
42,985 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,246 |
|
|
|
15,350 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
Tax (expense) benefit from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
558 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(684 |
) |
Net amortization (accretion) of premium on securities |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights fair value change and amortization, net |
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(3,713,883 |
) |
|
|
(1,290,805 |
) |
Originations of premium finance receivables held-for-sale |
|
|
(790,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of premium finance receivables held-for-sale |
|
|
106,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
3,620,400 |
|
|
|
1,342,456 |
|
Bank owned life insurance income, net of claims |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
(1,941 |
) |
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
(4,147 |
) |
|
|
(2,163 |
) |
Increase in trading securities, net |
|
|
(24,805 |
) |
|
|
(672 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
4,770 |
|
Gain on mortgage loans sold |
|
|
(38,656 |
) |
|
|
(10,497 |
) |
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Loss on sales of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Bargain purchase gain |
|
|
(113,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets, net |
|
|
(34,073 |
) |
|
|
(8,241 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities, net |
|
|
25,599 |
|
|
|
18,963 |
|
|
Net Cash (Used for) Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
(772,125 |
) |
|
|
136,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,146,564 |
|
|
|
687,323 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,145,137 |
|
|
|
744,488 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(2,153,313 |
) |
|
|
(1,503,619 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of premium finance receivables |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
217,834 |
|
Net cash paid for acquisition |
|
|
(685,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
(1,045,353 |
) |
|
|
5,724 |
|
Net decrease (increase) in loans |
|
|
122,433 |
|
|
|
(781,956 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(16,404 |
) |
|
|
(23,719 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities |
|
|
(886,392 |
) |
|
|
(653,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deposit accounts |
|
|
1,470,407 |
|
|
|
358,033 |
|
(Decrease) increase in other borrowings, net |
|
|
(84,693 |
) |
|
|
41,957 |
|
Decrease in notes payable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,675 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
23,802 |
|
Repayment of subordinated note |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,379 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stockbased compensation arrangements |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
Issuance of common shares resulting from exercise of stock options,
employee stock purchase plan and conversion of common stock warrants |
|
|
2,741 |
|
|
|
2,804 |
|
Common stock repurchases |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(17,658 |
) |
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
|
1,364,374 |
|
|
|
449,403 |
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(294,143 |
) |
|
|
(67,772 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
445,904 |
|
|
|
261,154 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
151,761 |
|
|
$ |
193,382 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Wintrust Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
(Wintrust or the Company) presented herein are unaudited, but in the opinion of management
reflect all necessary adjustments of a normal or recurring nature for a fair presentation of
results as of the dates and for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and do not include information or
footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
included in the Companys Annual Report and Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Operating results reported for the three-month and year-to-date periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire year. Reclassifications of certain
prior period amounts have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Management believes that the
estimates made are reasonable, however, changes in estimates may be required if economic or other
conditions develop differently from managements expectations. In preparing these financial
statements, management has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition and or
disclosure through November 9, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. Certain
policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be
materially different than originally reported. Management views critical accounting policies to be
those which are highly dependent on subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and
where changes in those estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial
statements. Management currently views the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the
allowance for losses on lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the valuations
required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative
instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex
judgments, and as such could be the most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
Descriptions of our significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 (Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies) of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K.
(2) Recent Accounting Developments
Accounting Standards Codification
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (The
Codification). The Codification reorganized existing U.S. accounting and reporting standards
issued by the FASB and other related private sector standard setters into a single source of
authoritative accounting principles arranged by topic. The Codification supersedes all existing
U.S. accounting standards; all other accounting literature not included in the Codification (other
than Securities and Exchange Commission guidance for publicly-traded companies) is considered
non-authoritative. The Codification was effective on a prospective basis for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the
Companys references to U.S. GAAP accounting standards but did not impact the Companys financial
statements.
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166) and SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167) which have not yet been adopted into Codification. The
amendments will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. SFAS 166 amends SFAS 140 by
removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for
derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures about a
5
transferors continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. As described more fully in
Note 8 Loan Securitization, the Company has transferred certain loans to a qualifying special
purpose entity (QSPE) which is not currently subject to consolidation.
SFAS 167 amends FIN 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46R) by
significantly changing the criteria by which an enterprise determines whether it must consolidate a
variable interest entity (VIE). A VIE is an entity, typically an SPE, which has insufficient
equity at risk or which is not controlled through voting rights held by equity investors. FIN 46R
currently requires that a VIE be consolidated by the enterprise that will absorb a majority of the
expected losses or expected residual returns created by the assets of the VIE. SFAS 167 amends FIN
46R to require that a VIE be consolidated by the enterprise that has both the power to direct the
activities that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and the obligation to
absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
SFAS 167 also requires that an enterprise continually reassess, based on current facts and
circumstances, whether it should consolidate the VIEs with which it is involved.
The adoption of the amendments on January 1, 2010 will result in the consolidation of a QSPE that
is not currently recorded on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition. The consolidation
will result in an increase in net assets, primarily loans and other
borrowings, of approximately
$600 million. The consolidation will also result in an increase in the provision for credit losses
and will require a reversal of a portion of previously recognized securitization gains as a
cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings. See Note 8 Loan Securitization, for
additional information regarding the QSPE.
Subsequent Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for the recognition and disclosure of subsequent events
not addressed in other applicable generally accepted accounting principles. The new guidance, which
is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 855, Subsequent Events, requires
entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the nature
and estimated financial effects of certain subsequent events. This new guidance is effective for
interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and will be applied prospectively.
The adoption of this new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements. See Note 18 Subsequent Events, for disclosures relating to subsequent events.
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance related to the disclosure of the fair value of
financial instruments. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 825, Financial Instruments,
requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments whenever a publicly traded company
issues financial information in interim reporting periods in addition to the annual disclosure
required at year-end. The provisions of the new guidance were effective for interim periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009. See Note
5 Available-for-sale Securities, for the required disclosures in accordance with this guidance.
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for other-than temporary
impairments. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 320 Investments Debt and Equity
Securities (ASC 320), amends the other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) guidance in GAAP for
debt securities and the presentation and disclosure requirements of OTTI on debt and equity
securities in the financial statements. This new guidance does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to OTTI of equity securities. The new guidance requires separate
display of losses related to credit deterioration and losses related to other market factors. When
an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that an entity will
not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it must recognize the credit
component of OTTI in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. The new
guidance is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption
permitted. The Company adopted the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009. See Note 5 -
Available-for-sale Securities, for a further discussion on the adoption of the new guidance.
6
Additional Fair Value Measurement Guidance
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for determining when a transaction is not orderly and
for estimating fair value when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity for an asset or liability. The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), requires disclosure of the inputs and valuation techniques
used, as well as any changes in valuation techniques and inputs used during the period, to measure
fair value in interim and annual periods. In addition, the presentation of the fair value
hierarchy is required to be presented by major security type as described in ASC 320. The
provisions of the new guidance were effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of the new guidance in the second quarter of 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance on the disclosure of derivative instruments and hedging
activities. The new guidance, which is now a part of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging
Activities, requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using
derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of, and gains and losses on,
derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. The provisions of the new guidance were effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. See Note 14 Derivative Financial
Instruments, for the required disclosures in accordance with this new guidance.
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for noncontrolling interests.
The new guidance, which is now part of ASC 810, Consolidation, establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Business Combinations
In April 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for recognizing and measuring pre-acquisition
contingencies in a business combination. The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 805,
Business Combinations, revises the definition of a business and amends and clarifies prior
guidance to address application issues on initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
a business combination. The revised guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of the revised
guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued revised guidance for the accounting for business combinations.
The revised guidance, which is now part of ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), requires the
acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date; the immediate expense recognition
of transaction costs; and accounting for restructuring plans separately from the business
combination. The application of ASC 805 eliminates separate recognition of the acquired allowance
for loan losses on the acquirers balance sheet as credit related factors will be incorporated
directly into the fair value of the loans recorded at the acquisition date. The application of ASC
805 is effective for business combinations occurring after December 15, 2008. The Company applied
ASC 805 to its July 28, 2009 acquisition of a majority of the U.S. life insurance premium finance
assets of A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount Company, subsidiaries of American
International Group, Inc. See Note 3 Business Combinations, for more information on ASC 805.
7
(3) Business Combinations
On July 28, 2009 First Insurance Funding Corporation (FIFC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, purchased the majority of the U.S. life insurance premium finance assets of A.I. Credit
Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer Discount Company (the sellers), subsidiaries of American
International Group, Inc. After giving effect to post-closing adjustments, an aggregate unpaid principal
loan balance of $949.3 million was purchased for $685.3 million in cash. At closing, a portion of
the portfolio, with an aggregate unpaid principal loan balance of $321.1 million, and a
corresponding portion of the purchase price of $232.8 million were placed in escrow, pending the
receipt of required third party consents. To the extent any of the required consents are not
obtained prior to October 28, 2010, the corresponding portion of the portfolio will be reassumed by
the applicable seller, and the corresponding portion of the purchase price will be returned to
FIFC. Also, as a part of the purchase, an aggregate of $84.4 million of additional life insurance
premium finance assets were available for future purchase by FIFC subject to the satisfaction of
certain conditions. The majority of these conditions were satisfied in the fourth quarter of 2009, see Note 18
Subsequent Events, for more details.
The purchase was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC
805. Accordingly, the impact related to this transaction is included in the Companys financial
statements only since the effective date of acquisition. The purchased assets and assumed
liabilities were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values, and identifiable
intangible assets were recorded at fair value. Under ASC 805 a gain is recorded equal to the
amount by which the fair value of assets purchased exceeded the fair value of liabilities assumed
and consideration paid. As such, the Company recognized a $113.1 million bargain purchase gain in
the third quarter of 2009 relating to all of the loans it acquired which have all contingencies
removed as of September 30, 2009. This gain is shown as a component of non-interest income on the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Income.
The difference between the fair value of the loans acquired and the outstanding principal balance
of these loans represents a discount of $113.3 million and is comprised of two components, an
accretable component totaling $74.8 million and a non-accretable component totaling $38.5 million.
The accretable component will be recognized into interest income using the effective yield method
over its estimated remaining life. The non-accretable portion will be evaluated each quarter and
if the loans credit related conditions improve, a relative portion will be transferred to the
accretable component and accreted over future periods. In the event of a prepayment, accretion of
both the accretable and non-accretable component will be accelerated into the quarter in which a
specific loan prepays in whole. Currently, the Company has not established an allowance for loan
losses relating to the portfolio purchased in this transaction. If credit related conditions
deteriorate, an allowance related to these loans will be established as part of the provision for
loan losses.
The following table summarizes the net fair value of assets acquired and the resulting bargain
purchase gain at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
835,952 |
|
Customer list intangible |
|
|
1,800 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
837,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid |
|
|
685,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bargain purchase gain |
|
$ |
152,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargain purchase gain recorded in third quarter 2009 |
|
|
113,062 |
|
Bargain purchase gain deferred pending third party consents |
|
$ |
39,384 |
|
8
(4) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers cash and cash
equivalents to include cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, non-interest bearing
amounts due from correspondent banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements with original maturities of three months or less.
(5) Available-for-sale Securities
The following tables are a summary of the available-for-sale securities portfolio as of the dates
shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
121,597 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,701 |
) |
|
$ |
112,896 |
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
655,161 |
|
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
655,024 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
64,790 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
66,900 |
|
Corporate notes and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial issuers (1) |
|
42,948 |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
(3,173 |
) |
|
40,945 |
|
Retained subordinated securities |
|
47,647 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
48,004 |
|
Other |
|
11,205 |
|
|
622 |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
11,557 |
|
Mortgage-backed: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
214,683 |
|
|
11,277 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
225,952 |
|
Non-agency CMOs |
|
106,285 |
|
|
5,053 |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
110,633 |
|
Non-agency CMOs Alt A |
|
54,840 |
|
|
900 |
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
54,085 |
|
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock |
|
|
71,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,889 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
36,415 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
36,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,427,460 |
|
|
$ |
23,272 |
|
|
$ |
(16,484 |
) |
|
$ |
1,434,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
To the extent investments in trust-preferred securities are included, they are direct issues
and do not include pooled trust-preferred securities. |
|
(2) |
|
Consisting entirely of residential mortgage-backed securities, none of which are subprime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
297,191 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
298,729 |
|
Municipal |
|
|
59,471 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
59,295 |
|
Corporate notes and other debt |
|
|
36,157 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(8,339 |
) |
|
|
28,041 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
272,492 |
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
285,307 |
|
Federal Reserve/FHLB stock and
other equity securities |
|
|
115,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,113 |
) |
|
|
113,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
780,725 |
|
|
$ |
15,184 |
|
|
$ |
(11,236 |
) |
|
$ |
784,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
recognition of other than temporary impairment for debt securities resulted in the recognition of a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings with a corresponding charge to accumulated other
comprehensive income of $309,000. No impairment charges were recorded
in the second quarter of 2009. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recognized a $472,000
impairment charge on a corporate note of a financial issuer.
The following tables present the portion of the Companys available-for-sale securities portfolio
which has gross unrealized losses, reflecting the length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuous unrealized |
|
Continuous unrealized |
|
|
|
|
losses existing for |
|
losses existing for |
|
|
|
|
less than 12 months |
|
greater than 12 months |
|
Total |
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
112,896 |
|
|
|
(8,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,896 |
|
|
|
(8,701 |
) |
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
132,423 |
|
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,423 |
|
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
Municipal |
|
|
13,992 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
16,097 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
Corporate notes and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial issuers |
|
11,096 |
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
3,462 |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
14,558 |
|
|
(3,173 |
) |
Retained
subordinated securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,477 |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
7,477 |
|
|
(270 |
) |
Mortgage-backed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency |
|
390 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Non-agency CMOs |
|
37,641 |
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
157 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
37,798 |
|
|
(705 |
) |
Non-agency CMOs Alt A |
|
34,107 |
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,107 |
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
342,545 |
| |
|
(13,497 |
) |
|
15,431 |
|
|
|
(2,987 |
) |
|
357,976 |
|
|
|
(16,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not consider these unrealized losses to be other-than-temporary at September
30, 2009. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not
that the Company will be required to sell these investments before recovery of the amortized cost
bases, which may be the maturity dates of the securities. The unrealized losses within each
category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates and market spreads subsequent to
purchase. A substantial portion of the securities that have unrealized losses are either U.S.
Treasury securities or corporate notes of financial issuers. The corporate notes of financial
issuers with continuous losses existing for greater than 12 months
represent three trust-preferred securities with unrealized losses
totaling $2.5 million.
These three securities represent financial issuers with high investment grade credit ratings. Most
of these obligations were purchased in 1999, have interest rates significantly below the rates at
which these types of obligations are currently issued, and have maturity dates in 2027. Although
they are currently callable by the issuers, it is unlikely that they will be called in the near
future as the interest rates are very attractive to the issuers. A review of the issuers indicated
that they have recently raised equity capital and/or have strong capital ratios. The Company does
not own any pooled trust-preferred securities.
The Company conducts a regular assessment of its investment securities to determine whether
securities are other-than-temporarily impaired considering, among other factors, the nature of the
securities, credit ratings or financial condition of the issuer, the extent and duration of the
unrealized loss, expected cash flows, market conditions and the Companys ability to hold the
securities through the anticipated recovery period.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $2.1 million of other than temporary
impairment on certain corporate debt securities. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted new
guidance for the measurement and recognition of other than temporary impairment for debt
securities, which is now part of ASC 320. If an entity does not intend to sell, and it is more
likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell a debt security before recovery of its
cost basis, impairment should be separated into (a) the amount representing credit loss and (b) the
amount related to all other factors. The amount of impairment related to credit loss is recognized
in earnings and the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income
(loss). To determine the amount related to credit loss, the Company applied a method similar to
that described by ASC 310, Receivables, using a single best estimate of expected cash flows. The
Companys adoption of new guidance for the measurement and
Changes in the amount of credit losses recognized in net income on these corporate debt
securities are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(4,195 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,181 |
) |
Credit losses not previously recognized |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
Reductions for securities sold during the period |
|
|
3,043 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
(1,624 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,624 |
) |
|
|
|
10
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of September 30, 2009, by contractual
maturity, are shown in the
following table. Contractual maturities may differ from actual maturities as borrowers may have
the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Mortgage-backed securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity
summary as actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the underlying
mortgages may be called or prepaid without penalty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
102,362 |
|
|
|
102,801 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
325,697 |
|
|
|
336,407 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
371,902 |
|
|
|
354,812 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
143,387 |
|
|
|
141,306 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
375,808 |
|
|
|
390,670 |
|
Federal Reserve and FHLB stock |
|
|
71,889 |
|
|
|
71,889 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
36,415 |
|
|
|
36,363 |
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
1,427,460 |
|
|
|
1,434,248 |
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information as to the amount of gross gains and losses realized
through the sales of available-for-sale investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
1,601 |
|
|
$ |
3,417 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(1,541 |
) |
|
|
(1,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Loans
The following table shows the Companys loan portfolio by category as of September 30, 2009, as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
5,035,859 |
|
|
$ |
4,778,664 |
|
|
$ |
4,673,682 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
928,548 |
|
|
|
896,438 |
|
|
|
837,127 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
281,151 |
|
|
|
262,908 |
|
|
|
247,203 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
752,032 |
|
|
|
1,243,858 |
|
|
|
1,164,256 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
1,045,653 |
|
|
|
102,728 |
|
|
|
41,120 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
115,528 |
|
|
|
175,955 |
|
|
|
199,845 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
116,486 |
|
|
|
160,518 |
|
|
|
159,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
8,275,257 |
|
|
$ |
7,621,069 |
|
|
$ |
7,322,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Residential real estate |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Certain premium finance receivables are recorded net of unearned income. The unearned income portions
of such premium finance receivables were $30.1 million at September 30, 2009, $27.1 million at December
31, 2008 and $23.4 million at September 30, 2008. Life insurance premium finance receivables are
also recorded net of credit discounts attributable to the life insurance premium finance loan
acquisition in the third quarter of 2009. The accretable component of the credit discount was
$67.4 million and the non-accretable component of the credit discount was $36.2 million at
September 30, 2009. The accretable component will be recognized into interest income using the
effective yield method over its estimated remaining life. The non-accretable portion will be
evaluated each quarter and if the loans credit related conditions improve, a relative portion will
be transferred to the accretable component and accreted over future periods. In the event of a
prepayment, accretion of both the accretable and non-accretable component will be accelerated into
the quarter in which a specific loan prepays in whole.
Indirect consumer loans include auto, boat and other indirect consumer loans. Total loans include
net deferred loan fees and costs and fair value purchase accounting adjustments totaling $10.4
million at September 30, 2009, $9.4 million at December 31, 2008 and $9.3 million at September 30,
2008.
Commercial and commercial real estate loans. Our commercial and commercial real estate loan
portfolios are comprised primarily of commercial real estate loans and lines of credit for working
capital purposes. The table below sets forth information regarding the types, amounts and
performance of our loans within these portfolios:
Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 90 Days |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
For Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
and Still |
|
|
Losses |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
accrual |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Allocation |
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
$ |
1,345,111 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
$ |
16,689 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
21,799 |
|
Franchise |
|
|
107,447 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit |
|
|
73,816 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
Community Advantage homeowner associations |
|
|
60,146 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Aircraft |
|
|
41,606 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Other |
|
|
15,595 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
$ |
1,643,721 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
$ |
19,035 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
$ |
25,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and development |
|
$ |
1,041,641 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
$ |
103,573 |
|
|
$ |
10,090 |
|
|
$ |
22,102 |
|
Office |
|
|
544,772 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
10,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
466,725 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
8,476 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
7,012 |
|
Retail |
|
|
570,589 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
10,698 |
|
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
7,846 |
|
Mixed use and other |
|
|
768,411 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
14,915 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|
$ |
3,392,138 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
$ |
147,691 |
|
|
$ |
22,619 |
|
|
$ |
54,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial and Commercial Real Estate |
|
$ |
5,035,859 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
$ |
166,726 |
|
|
$ |
23,377 |
|
|
$ |
79,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estatecollateral location by
state: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
$ |
2,729,454 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
375,911 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total primary markets |
|
$ |
3,105,365 |
|
|
|
91.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
48,300 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
43,164 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
42,226 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (no individual state greater than 0.6%) |
|
|
153,083 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,392,138 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Our commercial real estate loan portfolio predominantly relates to owner-occupied real estate,
and our loans are generally secured by a first mortgage lien and assignment of rents on the
property. Since most of our bank branches are located in the Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area
and southeastern Wisconsin, 91.6% of our commercial real estate loan portfolio is located in this
region. Commercial real estate market conditions continued to be under stress in the third quarter
of 2009, and we expect this trend to continue. These conditions have negatively affected our
commercial real estate loan portfolio, and as of September 30, 2009, our allowance for loan losses
related to this portfolio is $54.7 million.
We make commercial loans for many purposes, including: working capital lines, which are generally
renewable annually and supported by business assets, personal guarantees and additional collateral;
loans to condominium and homeowner associations originated through Barrington Banks Community
Advantage program; small aircraft financing, an earning asset niche developed at Crystal Lake Bank;
and franchise lending at Lake Forest Bank. Commercial business lending is generally considered to
involve a higher degree of risk than traditional consumer bank lending, and as a result of the
economic recession, allowance for loan losses in our commercial loan portfolio is $25.1 million as
of September 30, 2009.
Our allowance for loan losses for commercial and commercial real estate loans in the aggregate has
increased to $79.9 million as of September 30, 2009 from $57.0 million as of December 31, 2008 and
$54.4 million as of September 30, 2008.
The Company also participates in mortgage warehouse lending by providing interim funding to
unaffiliated mortgage bankers to finance residential mortgages originated by such bankers for sale
into the secondary market. The Companys loans to the mortgage bankers are secured by the business
assets of the mortgage companies as well as the specific mortgage loans funded by the Company,
after they have been pre-approved for purchase by third party end lenders. End lender re-payments
are sent directly to the Company upon end-lenders acceptance of final loan documentation. The
Company may also provide interim financing for packages of mortgage loans on a bulk basis in
circumstances where the mortgage bankers desire to competitively bid on a number of mortgages for
sale as a package in the secondary market. Typically, the Company will serve as sole funding source
for its mortgage warehouse lending customers under short-term revolving credit agreements. Amounts
advanced with respect to any particular mortgage loan are usually required to be repaid within 21
days.
Despite poor economic conditions generally, and the particularly difficult conditions in the U.S.
residential real estate market experienced since 2008, our mortgage warehouse lending business has
expanded during 2009 due to the high demand for mortgage re-financings given the historically low
interest rate environment and the fact that many of our competitors exited the market in late 2008
and early 2009. The expansion of this business has caused our mortgage warehouse lines to increase
to $73.8 million as of September 30, 2009 from $55.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and $44.4
million as of September 30, 2008. Additionally, our allowance for loan losses with respect to
these loans is $985,000 as of September 30, 2009. Since the inception of this business, the
Company has not suffered any related loan losses on these loans.
13
(7) Allowance for Loan Losses, Allowance for Losses on Lending-Related Commitments and
Impaired Loans
The following table presents a summary of the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
85,113 |
|
|
$ |
57,633 |
|
|
$ |
69,767 |
|
|
$ |
50,389 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
91,193 |
|
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
129,329 |
|
|
|
42,985 |
|
Reclassification (to)/from allowance for losses
on lending-related commitments |
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(80,072 |
) |
|
|
(15,816 |
) |
|
|
(103,602 |
) |
|
|
(28,067 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at period end |
|
$ |
95,096 |
|
|
$ |
66,327 |
|
|
$ |
95,096 |
|
|
$ |
66,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for losses on lending-related
commitments at period end |
|
$ |
3,129 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
3,129 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at period end |
|
$ |
98,225 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
$ |
98,225 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of non-accrual, impaired loans and loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing
interest are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing interest |
|
$ |
36,937 |
|
|
$ |
25,385 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
194,722 |
|
|
|
110,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
231,659 |
|
|
$ |
136,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans (included in Non-performing loans): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired
loans with an allowance for loan loss required (1) |
|
$ |
96,514 |
|
|
$ |
73,849 |
|
Impaired loans with no allowance for loan loss required |
|
|
51,494 |
|
|
|
39,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
148,008 |
|
|
$ |
113,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses related to impaired loans |
|
$ |
16,485 |
|
|
$ |
16,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These impaired loans require an allowance for loan losses because the
estimated fair value of the loans or related collateral is less than the recorded investment
in the loans. |
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $125.8 million and $41.9 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
14
(8) Loan Securitization
Servicing Portfolio
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company entered into an off-balance sheet securitization
transaction sponsored by FIFC. In connection with the securitization, premium finance receivables
- commercial were transferred, subject to credit recourse, to FIFC Premium Funding, LLC, a
qualifying special purpose entity (the QSPE). The Companys primary continuing involvement
includes servicing the loans, retaining an undivided interest (the sellers interest) in the
loans, and holding certain retained interests (e.g., subordinated securities, overcollateralization
of loans, cash reserve accounts, a servicing asset, and an interest-only strip). Provided that
certain coverage test criteria are met, principal collections will be used to subsequently transfer
additional loans to the QSPE during the stated revolving period. Additionally, upon the occurrence
of certain events established in the representations and warranties, FIFC may be required to
repurchase ineligible loans that were transferred to the QSPE. The maximum amount of risk related
to these repurchase provisions and non performance by the underlying borrowers is approximately
equal to the carrying value of the Companys retained interests. As of September 30, 2009, no
loans have been repurchased.
Instruments issued by the QSPE included $600 million Class A notes that bear an annual interest
rate of LIBOR plus 1.45% (the Notes) and have an expected average term of 2.93 years with any
unpaid balance due and payable in full on February 17, 2014. At the time of issuance, the Notes
were eligible collateral under the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorks Term Asset-Backed Securities
Loan Facility (TALF). The Notes are rated Aaa by Moodys and AAA by Standard & Poors. Class B
and Class C notes (Subordinated securities), which are recorded in the form of zero coupon bonds,
were also issued and were retained by the Company. These notes are rated A and BBB respectively by
Standard and Poors.
The sellers interest maintained by the Company is equal to the balance of all loans transferred to
the QSPE plus the associated accrued interest receivable less the investors portion of those
assets (securitized loans). Sellers interest is carried at historical cost and reported as loans,
net of unearned income on the Companys Consolidated Statement of Condition.
The following table illustrates the activity in the QSPE for the quarter ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
FIFC Premium
Funding, LLC loan assets, June 30 |
|
$ |
|
|
Impact of issuance |
|
|
695,103 |
|
Collections reinvested |
|
|
106,282 |
|
Account activity, net |
|
|
(140,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
FIFC Premium
Funding, LLC loan assets, September 30 |
|
$ |
661,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table details the securitized loans and sellers
interest components of the FIFC Premium Funding, LLC loan assets in
the preceding table:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
Securitized loans, June 30 |
|
$ |
|
|
Impact of issuances, external |
|
|
600,000 |
|
Impact of issuances, retained |
|
|
83,762 |
|
Collections reinvested |
|
|
106,282 |
|
Account activity, net |
|
|
(137,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Securitized loans, September 30 |
|
$ |
652,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sellers interest, June 30 |
|
$ |
|
|
Impact of issuance |
|
|
11,341 |
|
Account activity, net |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Sellers interest, September 30 |
|
$ |
9,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization Income
At the time of a loan securitization, the Company records a gain/(loss) on sale, which is
calculated as the difference between the proceeds from the sale and the book basis of the loans
sold. The book basis is determined by allocating the carrying amount of the sold loans between the
loans sold and the interests retained based on their relative fair values. Such fair values are
based on market prices at the date of transfer for the sold loans and on the estimated present
value of future cash flows for retained interests. Gains on sale from securitizations are reported
in gain on sales of premium finance receivables in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Income
and were $3.4 million in the third quarter of 2009. The income component resulting from the release
of credit reserves upon classification as held-for-sale is reported as a reduction of provision for
credit losses.
15
Also reported in gain on sales of premium finance receivables are changes in the fair value of the
interest-only strip. This amount is the excess cash flow from interest collections allocated to
the investors interests after deducting the interest paid on investor certificates, credit losses,
contractual servicing fees, and other expenses. Changes in the fair value of the interest-only
strip of $173,000 were reported in gain on sale of premium finance receivables in the third quarter
of 2009.
The Company has retained servicing responsibilities for the transferred loans and earns a related
fee. Servicing fee income was $712,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and is reported in
other non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Retained Interests
The Company retained subordinated interests in the securitized loans. These interests include the
Subordinated securities, overcollateralization of loans, cash reserves, a servicing asset, and an
interest-only strip. The following table presents the Companys retained interests at September 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
Subordinated securities (a) |
|
$ |
48,004 |
|
Residual interests held (b) |
|
|
42,622 |
|
Servicing asset (b) |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total retained interests |
|
$ |
91,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The subordinated securities are
accounted for at fair value and are reported as
available-for-sale securities on the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Condition with
unrealized gains recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income. See Note 15 for further
discussion on fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
The residual interests and servicing asset
are accounted for at fair value and reported in
other assets on the Companys Consolidated
Statement of Condition. Retained interests held
includes overcollateralization of loans, cash
reserve deposits, and an interest-only strip.
See Note 15 for further discussion on
fair value. |
Key economic assumptions used in the measuring of fair value and the sensitivity of the
current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at September 30, 2009, for the
Companys servicing asset and other interests held related to securitized loans are presented in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated |
|
Residual |
|
Servicing |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
Interests |
|
Asset |
Fair Value of interest held |
|
$ |
48,004 |
|
|
$ |
42,622 |
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected weighted-average life (in months) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Decrease in fair value from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 month reduction |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
(1,206 |
) |
|
$ |
(204 |
) |
2 month reduction |
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
(2,420 |
) |
|
$ |
(403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate assumptions |
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
%(a) |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
Decrease in fair value from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point increase |
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
200 basis point increase |
|
$ |
(513 |
) |
|
$ |
(399 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss assumption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
Decrease in fair value from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% higher loss |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(154 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
20% higher loss |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(310 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes the discount rate on cash reserve deposits deemed to be immaterial. |
The sensitivities in the table above are hypothetical and caution should be exercised when
relying on this data. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value
may not be linear.
16
The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of the Companys servicing asset for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value determined upon transfer of loans |
|
|
1,795 |
|
Changes in fair value due to changes in inputs and assumptions |
|
|
(470 |
) (a) |
Other changes |
|
|
11 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company measures servicing assets at fair value at each reporting date and reports changes in other non-interest
income |
|
(b) |
|
Represents accretable yield reported in other non-interest income. |
The key economic assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the servicing asset include
the prepayment speed and weighted-average life, the discount rate, and default rate. The primary
risk of material changes in the value of the servicing asset resides in the potential volatility in
the economic assumptions used, particularly the prepayment speed and weighted-average life.
Other Disclosures
The table below summarizes cash flows received from the QSPE for the quarter ended September 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
Proceeds from new securitizations during the period |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested in revolving securitizations |
|
|
106,282 |
|
Servicing and other fees received |
|
|
|
|
Excess spread received |
|
|
|
|
The following table presents quantitative information about the premium finance receivables -
commercial at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loans 30 days or |
|
|
Net Credit |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
More Past Due |
|
|
Write-offs during |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
|
or on Nonaccrual |
|
|
the Quarter |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
$ |
1,404,221 |
|
|
$ |
48,177 |
|
|
$ |
2,317 |
|
Less: Premium finance receivables commercial securitized |
|
|
652,189 |
|
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables commercial on-balance sheet |
|
$ |
752,032 |
|
|
$ |
42,081 |
|
|
$ |
2,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
A summary of the Companys goodwill assets by business segment is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
Acquired |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
2009 |
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
245,886 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
246,101 |
|
Specialty finance |
|
|
16,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,095 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
276,310 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
276,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the Community banking segments goodwill in the first nine months of 2009
relates to additional contingent consideration paid to the former owners of Wintrust Mortgage
Corporation (formerly known as WestAmerica Mortgage Company) and its
affiliate, Guardian Real Estate Services, Inc., as a result of attaining certain performance measures. This was the final payment of
contingent consideration due as a result of the Companys 2004
acquisition of these companies.
Pursuant to the acquisition of PMP in December 2008, Wintrust could pay contingent consideration to
the former owner of PMP as a result of attaining certain performance measures through December
2011. Any contingent payments made pursuant to this transaction would be reflected as increases in
the Community banking segments goodwill.
17
A summary of finite-lived intangible assets as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008 and the expected amortization as of September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Customer list intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
5,052 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3,202 |
) |
|
|
(3,079 |
) |
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
|
|
27,918 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(15,400 |
) |
|
|
(13,483 |
) |
|
|
(12,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
12,518 |
|
|
|
14,435 |
|
|
|
15,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
14,368 |
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
|
|
15,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amortization |
Actual in 9 months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
Estimated remaining in 2009 |
|
|
712 |
|
Estimated 2010 |
|
|
2,466 |
|
Estimated 2011 |
|
|
2,339 |
|
Estimated 2012 |
|
|
2,336 |
|
Estimated 2013 |
|
|
2,320 |
|
On
July 28, 2009, the Company recorded $1.8 million in unamortized finite-lived intangible assets,
classified on the Consolidated Statement of Condition as other intangible assets. These other
intangible assets relate to the value of the customer lists in the acquisition of the life
insurance premium finance portfolio and certain other assets related to the business and the
assumption of certain related liabilities. The customer list intangible assets are amortized on an
accelerated basis over an approximate six-year average life.
The $3.3
million of wealth management customer list intangibles recognized in connection with the acquisitions of
Lake Forest Capital Management in 2003 and Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company in 2002 are being
amortized over seven-year periods on an accelerated basis. The core deposit intangibles recognized
in connection with the
Companys seven bank acquisitions between 2003 and 2006 are being amortized over ten-year periods
on an accelerated basis. Amortization expense associated with finite-lived intangibles totaled
approximately $2.0 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
18
(10) Deposits
The following table is a summary of deposits as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
841,668 |
|
|
$ |
757,844 |
|
|
$ |
717,587 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,245,689 |
|
|
|
1,040,105 |
|
|
|
1,012,393 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
935,740 |
|
|
|
716,178 |
|
|
|
583,715 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,468,228 |
|
|
|
1,124,068 |
|
|
|
997,638 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
513,239 |
|
|
|
337,808 |
|
|
|
317,108 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,842,599 |
|
|
|
4,400,747 |
|
|
|
4,201,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
9,847,163 |
|
|
$ |
8,376,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,829,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mix: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth management deposits represent deposit balances at the Companys subsidiary banks from
brokerage customers of Wayne Hummer Investments, trust and asset management customers of Wayne
Hummer Trust Company and brokerage customers from unaffiliated companies.
(11) Notes Payable, Federal Home Loan Bank Advances, Other Borrowings and Subordinated
Notes
The following table is a summary of notes payable, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other
borrowings and subordinated notes as of the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
42,025 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
433,983 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
438,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
250,263 |
|
|
|
334,925 |
|
|
|
260,542 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
|
252,071 |
|
|
|
336,764 |
|
|
|
296,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable, Federal Home
Loan Bank advances, other borrowings
and subordinated notes |
|
$ |
752,054 |
|
|
$ |
843,745 |
|
|
$ |
852,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had a $1.0 million outstanding balance under a $26.0
million loan agreement (Agreement) with an unaffiliated bank. The Agreement consisted of a $25.0
million revolving note, maturing on October 30, 2009, and a $1.0 million note that maturing on June
1, 2015. At September 30, 2009, there was no outstanding balance on the $25.0 million revolving
note. Effective August 31, 2009, interest under the Agreement was calculated at a floating rate
equal to the greater of: (1) 450 basis points or (2) at the Companys option, either (a) LIBOR plus
350 basis points or (b) the prime rate plus 50 basis points. Prime rate means the highest of (a)
the unaffiliated banks prime rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points and (c) the
LIBOR rate that would be applicable for an interest period of one month plus 1.0%. Commencing August 2009, a commitment fee
was payable quarterly under the Agreement of 0.50% of the actual daily amount by which the lenders
commitment under the $25.0 million revolving note exceeded the amount outstanding under such
facility. The Agreement was secured by the
19
stock of some of the banks and contained several
restrictive covenants, including the maintenance of various capital adequacy levels, asset quality
and profitability ratios, and certain restrictions on dividends and other indebtedness. The
Agreement was available to be utilized, as needed, to provide capital to fund continued growth at
the Companys banks and to serve as an interim source of funds for acquisitions, common stock
repurchases or other general corporate purposes.
As more fully described in Note 18 Subsequent Events, on October 30, 2009, the Company entered
into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which altered the terms of the Agreement, and which
provides for a $1.0 million term loan and a $25 million revolving credit facility, which mature on
October 29, 2010 and June 1, 2015, respectively.
Prior to September 1, 2009, the Company had a $101.0 million loan agreement with an unaffiliated
bank which consisted of a $100.0 million revolving note, with a maturity date of August 31, 2009,
and a $1.0 million note maturing on June 1, 2015. Interest was calculated, at the Companys
option, at a floating rate equal to either: (1) LIBOR plus 200 basis points or (2) the greater of
the lenders prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. The Company had no
outstanding balance under the revolving note during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of fixed rate obligations of the banks and are
collateralized by qualifying residential real estate and home equity loans and certain securities.
FHLB advances are stated at par value of the debt adjusted for unamortized fair value adjustments
recorded in connection with advances acquired through acquisitions.
At September 30, 2009, securities sold under repurchase agreements represent $73.4 million of
customer balances in sweep accounts in connection with master repurchase agreements at the banks
and $176.9 million of short-term borrowings from brokers.
The subordinated notes represent three notes, issued in October 2002, April 2003 and October 2005
(funded in May 2006). The balances of the notes as of September 30, 2009 were $20.0 million,
$20.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal
payments of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth year, with final maturities in the tenth year.
The Company may redeem the subordinated notes at any time prior to maturity. Interest on each
note is calculated at a rate equal to LIBOR plus 130 basis points.
(12) Junior Subordinated Debentures
As of September 30, 2009, the Company owned 100% of the common securities of nine trusts, Wintrust
Capital Trust III, Wintrust Statutory Trust IV, Wintrust Statutory Trust V, Wintrust Capital Trust
VII, Wintrust Capital Trust VIII, Wintrust Capital Trust IX, Northview Capital Trust I, Town
Bankshares Capital Trust I, and First Northwest Capital Trust I (the Trusts) set up to provide
long-term financing. The Northview, Town and First Northwest capital trusts were acquired as part
of the acquisitions of Northview Financial Corporation, Town Bankshares, Ltd., and First Northwest
Bancorp, Inc., respectively. The Trusts were formed for purposes of issuing trust preferred
securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the issuance of the trust
preferred securities and common securities solely in junior subordinated debentures issued by the
Company (or assumed by the Company in connection with an acquisition), with the same maturities and
interest rates as the trust preferred securities. The junior subordinated debentures are the sole
assets of the Trusts. In each Trust, the common securities represent approximately 3% of the junior
subordinated debentures and the trust preferred securities represent approximately 97% of the
junior subordinated debentures.
The Trusts are reported in the Companys consolidated financial statements as unconsolidated
subsidiaries. Accordingly, in the Consolidated Statements of Condition, the junior subordinated
debentures issued by the Company to the Trusts are reported as liabilities and the common
securities of the Trusts, all of which are owned by the Company, are included in available-for-sale
securities.
20
The following table provides a summary of the Companys junior subordinated debentures as of
September 30, 2009. The junior subordinated debentures represent the par value of the obligations
owed to the Trusts and basis adjustments for unamortized fair value adjustments recognized at the
respective acquisition dates for the Northview, Town and First Northwest obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
|
Trust Preferred |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate at |
|
|
Issue |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Redemption |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
|
Debentures |
|
|
Structure |
|
|
9/30/09 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Date |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust III |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,774 |
|
|
|
L+3.25 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
04/2003 |
|
|
|
04/2033 |
|
|
|
04/2008 |
|
Wintrust Statutory Trust IV |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
|
L+2.80 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
12/2003 |
|
|
|
12/2033 |
|
|
|
12/2008 |
|
Wintrust Statutory Trust V |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
L+2.60 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
05/2004 |
|
|
|
05/2034 |
|
|
|
06/2009 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust VII |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
51,550 |
|
|
|
L+1.95 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
12/2004 |
|
|
|
03/2035 |
|
|
|
03/2010 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust VIII |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
41,238 |
|
|
|
L+1.45 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
08/2005 |
|
|
|
09/2035 |
|
|
|
09/2010 |
|
Wintrust Capital Trust IX |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
51,547 |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
09/2006 |
|
|
|
09/2036 |
|
|
|
09/2011 |
|
Northview Capital Trust I |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
08/2003 |
|
|
|
11/2033 |
|
|
|
08/2008 |
|
Town Bankshares Capital Trust I |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
08/2003 |
|
|
|
11/2033 |
|
|
|
08/2008 |
|
First Northwest Capital Trust I |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
L+3.00 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
05/2004 |
|
|
|
05/2034 |
|
|
|
05/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
249,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The junior subordinated debentures totaled $249.5 million at September 30, 2009, December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2008.
The interest rates on the variable rate junior subordinated debentures are based on the three-month
LIBOR rate and reset on a quarterly basis. The interest rate on the Wintrust Capital Trust IX
junior subordinated debentures, currently fixed at 6.84%, changes to a variable rate equal to
three-month LIBOR plus 1.63% effective September 15, 2011. At September 30, 2009, the weighted
average contractual interest rate on the junior subordinated debentures was 3.52%. The Company
entered into $175 million of interest rate swaps to hedge the variable cash flows on certain junior
subordinated debentures. The hedge-adjusted rate on the junior subordinated debentures on September
30, 2009, was 7.11%. Distributions on all issues are payable on a quarterly basis.
The Company has guaranteed the payment of distributions and payments upon liquidation or redemption
of the trust preferred securities, in each case to the extent of funds held by the Trusts. The
Company and the Trusts believe that, taken together, the obligations of the Company under the
guarantees, the junior subordinated debentures, and other related agreements provide, in the
aggregate, a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee, on a subordinated basis, of all of the
obligations of the Trusts under the trust preferred securities. Subject to certain limitations, the
Company has the right to defer the payment of interest on the junior subordinated debentures at any
time, or from time to time, for a period not to exceed 20 consecutive quarters. The trust preferred
securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the junior
subordinated debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. The junior subordinated debentures
are redeemable in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time after the earliest redemption
dates shown in the table, and earlier at the discretion of the Company if certain conditions are
met, and, in any event, only after the Company has obtained Federal Reserve approval, if then
required under applicable guidelines or regulations.
The junior subordinated debentures, subject to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of
the Company for regulatory purposes. The amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other
capital elements in excess of those certain limitations could be included in Tier 2 capital,
subject to restrictions.
21
(13) Segment Information
The segment financial information provided in the following tables has been derived from the
internal profitability reporting system used by management to monitor and manage the financial
performance of the Company. The Company evaluates segment performance based on after-tax profit or
loss and other appropriate profitability measures common to each segment. Certain indirect
expenses have been allocated based on actual volume measurements and other criteria, as
appropriate. Inter-segment revenue and transfers are generally accounted for at current market
prices. The parent and inter-segment eliminations reflect parent company information and
inter-segment eliminations. Net revenue is a summation of net interest income and non-interest
income. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company combined the premium finance and Tricom segments
into the specialty finance segment. Prior period information has been restated to reflect this
change.
The net interest income, net revenue and segment profit of the community banking segment includes
income and related interest costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the specialty
finance segment. For purposes of internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the
results of its specialty finance segment as if all loans originated and sold to the community
banking segment were retained within that segments operations, thereby causing inter-segment
eliminations. See Note 3 Business Combinations, for more information on the life insurance
premium finance loan acquisition in the third quarter of 2009. Similarly, for purposes of
analyzing the contribution from the wealth management segment, management allocates the net
interest income earned by the community banking segment on deposit balances of customers of the
wealth management segment to the wealth management segment. See Note 10 Deposits, for more
information on these deposits. The following tables present a summary of certain operating
information for each reportable segment for the three and nine months ended for the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
$ Change in |
|
|
% Change in |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Contribution |
|
|
Contribution |
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
84,462 |
|
|
$ |
59,001 |
|
|
$ |
25,461 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
33,731 |
|
|
|
17,019 |
|
|
|
16,712 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
7,769 |
|
|
|
4,481 |
|
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(38,299 |
) |
|
|
(19,821 |
) |
|
|
(18,478 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income |
|
$ |
87,663 |
|
|
$ |
60,680 |
|
|
$ |
26,983 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
18,931 |
|
|
$ |
14,325 |
|
|
$ |
4,606 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
114,292 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
113,034 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
10,418 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
7,039 |
|
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
150,680 |
|
|
$ |
21,915 |
|
|
$ |
128,765 |
|
|
|
N/M |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
103,393 |
|
|
$ |
73,326 |
|
|
$ |
30,067 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
148,023 |
|
|
|
18,277 |
|
|
|
129,746 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
18,187 |
|
|
|
13,262 |
|
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(31,260 |
) |
|
|
(22,270 |
) |
|
|
(8,990 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
238,343 |
|
|
$ |
82,595 |
|
|
$ |
155,748 |
|
|
|
189 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
(35,372 |
) |
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
(36,736 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
120,428 |
|
|
|
7,881 |
|
|
|
112,547 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
4,357 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(57,418 |
) |
|
|
(14,101 |
) |
|
|
(43,317 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit (loss) |
|
$ |
31,995 |
|
|
$ |
(2,448 |
) |
|
$ |
34,443 |
|
|
|
N/M |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
11,871,595 |
|
|
$ |
9,782,483 |
|
|
$ |
2,089,112 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
2,069,415 |
|
|
|
1,321,968 |
|
|
|
747,447 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
60,990 |
|
|
|
56,614 |
|
|
|
4,376 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(1,865,979 |
) |
|
|
(1,296,145 |
) |
|
|
(569,834 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
$ |
12,136,021 |
|
|
$ |
9,864,920 |
|
|
$ |
2,271,101 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
$ Change in |
|
|
% Change in |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Contribution |
|
|
Contribution |
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
215,877 |
|
|
$ |
177,649 |
|
|
$ |
38,228 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
71,950 |
|
|
|
51,698 |
|
|
|
20,252 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
21,271 |
|
|
|
13,771 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(84,156 |
) |
|
|
(61,296 |
) |
|
|
(22,860 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net interest income |
|
$ |
224,942 |
|
|
$ |
181,822 |
|
|
$ |
43,120 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
70,614 |
|
|
$ |
55,442 |
|
|
$ |
15,172 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
115,746 |
|
|
|
4,434 |
|
|
|
111,312 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
27,975 |
|
|
|
28,543 |
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
18,224 |
|
|
|
(8,940 |
) |
|
|
27,164 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
232,559 |
|
|
$ |
79,479 |
|
|
$ |
153,080 |
|
|
|
193 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenue (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
286,491 |
|
|
$ |
233,091 |
|
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
187,696 |
|
|
|
56,132 |
|
|
|
131,564 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
49,246 |
|
|
|
42,314 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(65,932 |
) |
|
|
(70,236 |
) |
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
457,501 |
|
|
$ |
261,301 |
|
|
$ |
196,200 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community banking |
|
$ |
(24,865 |
) |
|
$ |
30,869 |
|
|
$ |
(55,734 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
)% |
Specialty finance |
|
|
136,713 |
|
|
|
24,502 |
|
|
|
112,211 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
Wealth management |
|
|
11,207 |
|
|
|
8,053 |
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Parent and inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(78,153 |
) |
|
|
(44,891 |
) |
|
|
(33,262 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment profit |
|
$ |
44,902 |
|
|
$ |
18,533 |
|
|
$ |
26,369 |
|
|
|
142 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14) Derivative Financial Instruments
Management uses derivative financial instruments to manage the Companys exposure to interest rate risk. The
derivative financial instruments currently used by the Company to manage its exposure to interest
rate risk include: (1) interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk of certain variable
rate liabilities; (2) interest rate lock commitments provided to customers to fund certain mortgage
loans to be sold into the secondary market; (3) forward commitments for the future delivery of such
loans to protect the Company from adverse changes in interest rates and corresponding changes in
the value of mortgage loans available-for-sale; and (4) covered call options related to specific
investment securities to enhance the overall yield on such securities. The Company also enters into
derivatives (typically interest rate swaps) with certain qualified borrowers to facilitate their
respective risk management strategies and concurrently enters into mirror-image derivatives with a
third party counterparty, effectively making a market in the derivatives for such borrowers.
As required by ASC 815, the Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments in the
consolidated financial statements at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the
instrument. Derivative financial instruments are included in other assets or other liabilities, as
appropriate, on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. Changes in the fair value of derivative
financial instruments are either recognized periodically in income or in shareholders equity as a
component of other comprehensive income depending on whether the derivative financial instrument
qualifies for hedge accounting, and if so, whether it qualifies as a fair value hedge or cash flow
hedge. Generally, changes in fair values of derivatives accounted for as fair value hedges are
recorded in income in the same period and in the same income statement line as changes in the fair
values of the hedged items that relate to the hedged risk(s). Changes in fair values of derivative
financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective hedges,
are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair
values of derivative financial instruments not qualifying as hedges pursuant to ASC 815 are
reported in non-interest income. Interest rate derivative contracts are valued by a third party and
are periodically validated by comparison with valuations provided by
23
the respective counterparties. Fair values of mortgage banking derivatives (interest rate lock
commitments and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans) are estimated based on changes in
mortgage interest rates from the date of the loan commitment.
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments as well
as their classification on the Consolidated Statements of Condition as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
September |
|
December |
|
Balance |
|
September |
|
December |
|
|
Sheet |
|
30, |
|
31, |
|
Sheet |
|
30, |
|
31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments
under ASC 815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
designated as Cash Flow
Hedges |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
16,252 |
|
|
$ |
19,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments
underASC 815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
8,914 |
|
|
$ |
9,115 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
9,262 |
|
|
$ |
9,294 |
|
Interest rate lock
commitments |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
Forward commitments to
sell mortgage loans |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
4,255 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under ASC
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,429 |
|
|
$ |
9,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,546 |
|
|
$ |
9,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,429 |
|
|
$ |
9,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,798 |
|
|
$ |
29,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest income
and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, the Company
primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest
rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a
counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements
without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had
five interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $175.0 million that were designated
as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk.
24
The table below provides details on each of these five interest rate swaps as of September 30,
2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Fair Value |
|
Receive Rate |
|
Pay Rate |
|
Type of Hedging |
Maturity Date |
|
Amount |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
(LIBOR) |
|
(Fixed) |
|
Relationship |
|
Pay Fixed, Receive Variable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2011 |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
(1,588 |
) |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2011 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(3,173 |
) |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
October 2011 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
0.51 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
(5,785 |
) |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
September 2013 |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(4,643 |
) |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
(16,252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, these interest rate swaps were used to hedge the variable cash outflows
associated with interest expense on the Companys junior subordinated debentures. The effective
portion of changes in the fair value of these cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are
made on the Companys variable rate junior subordinated debentures. The changes in fair value (net
of tax) are separately disclosed in the statement of changes in shareholders equity as a component
of comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of these derivatives
is recognized directly in earnings; however, no hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 or September 30, 2008. The Company uses the
hypothetical derivative method to assess and measure effectiveness.
In September 2008, the Company terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $25.0
million (maturing in October 2011) that was designated in a cash flow hedge and entered into a new
interest rate swap with another counterparty to effectively replace the terminated swap. The
interest rate swap was terminated by the Company in accordance with the default provisions in the
swap agreement. The unrealized loss on the interest rate swap at the date of termination is being
amortized out of other comprehensive income to interest expense over the remaining term of the
terminated swap. At September 30, 2009, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes
$898,000 of unrealized loss ($552,000 net of tax) related to this terminated interest rate swap.
A rollforward of the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income related to interest rate
swaps designated as cash flow hedges follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
|
30, 2008 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
|
30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) at beginning of period |
|
$ |
(15,982 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,158 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,549 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,067 |
) |
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income to interest expense on junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
2,090 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
5,492 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(3,258 |
) |
|
|
(1,820 |
) |
|
|
(2,093 |
) |
|
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) at end of period |
|
$ |
(17,150 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,971 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,150 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Company estimates that during the next twelve months, $8.3
million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as an increase to interest
expense.
Non-Designated Hedges
The Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes. Derivatives not designated as hedges
are used to manage the Companys exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but
do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of ASC 815. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings.
25
Interest Rate Derivatives The Company has interest rate derivatives, including swaps and option
products, resulting from a service the Company provides to certain qualified borrowers. The
Companys banking subsidiaries execute certain derivative products (typically interest rate swaps)
directly with qualified commercial borrowers to facilitate their respective risk management
strategies. For example, doing so allows the Companys commercial borrowers to effectively convert
a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. In order to minimize the Companys exposure on these
transactions, the Company simultaneously executes offsetting derivatives with third parties. In
most cases the offsetting derivatives have mirror-image terms, which result in the positions
changes in fair value substantially offsetting through earnings each period. However, to the extent
that the derivatives are not a mirror-image and because of differences in counterparty credit risk,
changes in fair value will not completely offset resulting in some earnings impact each period.
Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are included in other non-interest income. At
September 30, 2009, the Company had 90 derivative transactions (45 with customers and
45 with third parties) with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $372.8 million ($367.8
million of interest rate swaps and $5.0 million of interest rate options) related to this program.
These interest rate derivatives had maturity dates ranging from August 2010 to March 2019.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives These derivatives include interest rate lock commitments provided to
customers to fund certain mortgage loans to be sold into the secondary market and forward
commitments for the future delivery of such loans. It is the Companys practice to enter into
forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock
commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of future changes in
interest rates on its commitments to fund the loans as well as on its portfolio of mortgage loans
held-for-sale. The Companys mortgage banking derivatives have not been designated as being in
hedge relationships. At September 30, 2009 the Company had interest rate lock commitments with an
aggregate notional amount of $381.6 million and forward commitments to sell mortgage loans with an
aggregate notional amount of $569.1 million. The fair values of these derivatives were estimated
based on changes in mortgage rates from the dates of the commitments. Changes in the fair value of
these mortgage banking derivatives are included in mortgage banking revenue.
Other
Derivatives
Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain
securities held within the Banks investment portfolios (covered call options). These option
transactions are designed primarily to increase the total return associated with the investment
securities portfolio. These options do not qualify as hedges pursuant to ASC 815, and, accordingly,
changes in fair value of these contracts are recognized as other non-interest income. There were no
covered call options outstanding as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 or September 30, 2008.
Amounts included in the consolidated statement of income related to derivative instruments not
designated in hedge relationships were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
Derivative |
|
Location in income statement |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2008 |
|
30, 2009 |
|
30, 2008 |
Interest rate swaps and floors |
|
Other income |
|
$ |
(415 |
) |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
|
$ |
117 |
|
Mortgage banking derivatives |
|
Mortgage banking revenue |
|
|
(3,836 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
(1,649 |
) |
|
|
126 |
|
Covered call options |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
Credit Risk
Derivative instruments have inherent risks, primarily market risk and credit risk. Market risk is
associated with changes in interest rates and credit risk relates to the risk that the counterparty
will fail to perform according to the terms of the agreement. The amounts potentially subject to
market and credit risks are the streams of interest payments under the contracts and the market
value of the derivative instrument and not the notional principal amounts used
to express the volume of the transactions. Market and credit risks are managed and monitored as
part of the Companys overall asset-liability management process, except that the credit risk
related to derivatives entered into with certain qualified borrowers is managed through the
Companys standard loan underwriting process since these derivatives are secured through collateral
provided by the loan agreements. Actual exposures are monitored against various types of credit
limits established to contain risk within parameters. When deemed necessary,
26
appropriate types and amounts of collateral are obtained to minimize credit exposure.
The Company has agreements with certain of its interest rate derivative counterparties that contain
cross-default provisions, which provide that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where
repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also
be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Company also has agreements with certain
of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision allowing
the counter party to terminate the derivative positions if the Company fails to maintain
its status as a well / adequate capitalized institution, which would
require the Company to settle its obligations under the
agreements. As of September 30, 2009, the fair value of interest rate derivatives in a net
liability position, which includes accrued interest related to these agreements, was $26.4 million.
As of September 30, 2009 the Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with certain of its
derivative counterparties and has posted collateral consisting of $6.7 million of cash and $6.8
million of securities. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at September 30, 2009 it
would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value
and would have been required to pay any additional amounts due in excess of amounts previously
posted as collateral with the respective counterparty.
(15) Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities
Effective January 1, 2008, upon adoption of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, which is now
part of ASC 820, the Company began to group financial assets and financial liabilities measured at
fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and
the observability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
|
|
|
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability or inputs that are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys own assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets
and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing
models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments
for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or
estimation. |
A financial instruments categorization within the above valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires
judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets or liabilities. Following is a description
of the valuation methodologies used for the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis.
Available-for-sale and trading account securities Fair values for available-for-sale and trading
account securities are based on quoted market prices when available or through the use of
alternative approaches, such as matrix or model pricing or indicators from market makers.
Mortgage loans held-for-sale Mortgage loans originated by Wintrust Mortgage Company on or after
January 1, 2008 are carried at fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale is
determined by reference to investor price sheets for loan products with similar characteristics.
Mortgage servicing rights Fair value for mortgage servicing rights is determined utilizing a
third party valuation model which stratifies the servicing rights into pools based on product type
and interest rate. The fair value of each servicing rights pool is calculated based on the present
value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated
with that pool, given current market conditions. Estimates of fair value include assumptions about
prepayment speeds, interest rates and other factors which are subject to change over time.
Derivative instruments The Companys derivative instruments include interest rate swaps,
commitments to fund
27
mortgages for sale into the secondary market (interest rate locks) and forward commitments to end
investors for the sale of mortgage loans. Interest rate swaps are valued by a third party, using
models that primarily use market observable inputs, such as yield curves, and are validated by
comparison with valuations provided by the respective counterparties. The fair value for mortgage
derivatives is based on changes in mortgage rates from the date of the commitments.
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets The underlying assets relating to the nonqualified
deferred compensation plan are included in a trust and primarily consist of non-exchange traded
institutional funds which are priced based by an independent third party service.
Retained interests from the sale or securitization of premium finance receivables The fair value
of retained interests, which include overcollateralization of loans, cash reserves, servicing
rights and interest only strips, from the sale or securitization of premium finance receivables are
based on certain observable inputs such as interest rates and credits spreads, as well as
unobservable inputs such as prepayments, late payments and estimated net charge-offs.
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
112,896 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
112,896 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Government agencies |
|
|
655,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
66,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,257 |
|
|
|
17,643 |
|
Corporate notes and other |
|
|
100,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,120 |
|
|
|
52,386 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
390,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,931 |
|
|
|
163,739 |
|
Equity securities (1) |
|
|
28,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
25,689 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
29,204 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
27,564 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
187,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
11,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interests from the
sale/securitization of premium finance
receivables |
|
|
43,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,635,652 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
1,298,435 |
|
|
$ |
337,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
29,799 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,798 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Available-for-sale securities (1) |
|
$ |
1,391,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,342,814 |
|
|
$ |
48,712 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
2,243 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
|
|
63,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,854 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained interests from the sale of
premium finance receivables |
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,470,708 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
1,413,888 |
|
|
$ |
56,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
$ |
9,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes Federal Reserve and FHLB stock and the common securities issued by trusts formed by
the Company in conjunction with Trust Preferred Securities offerings. |
28
The aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and
2008 for mortgage loans held-for-sale measured at fair value under ASC 825 was $182.0 million and
$61.9 million, respectively, while the aggregate fair value of mortgage loans held-for-sale was
$187.5 million and $63.6 million, respectively, as shown in the above tables. There were no
nonaccrual loans or loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing in the mortgage loans
held-for-sale portfolio measured at fair value as of September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The changes in Level 3 available-for-sale securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Govt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
notes and |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Equity |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
agencies |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
other debt |
|
|
backed |
|
|
securities |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,355 |
|
|
$ |
4,378 |
|
|
$ |
167,376 |
|
|
$ |
25,681 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,400 |
|
|
|
48,004 |
|
|
|
(8,682 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,643 |
|
|
$ |
52,386 |
|
|
$ |
163,739 |
|
|
$ |
25,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
9,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
4,010 |
|
|
$ |
26,104 |
|
Total net gains included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
50,983 |
|
|
|
156,131 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(2,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,643 |
|
|
$ |
52,386 |
|
|
$ |
163,739 |
|
|
$ |
25,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for Municipal and Corporate notes and other is recognized as a component of interest income on
securities. |
The changes in Level 3 for assets and liabilities not including in the preceding table
measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the three months and nine months ended September
30, 2009 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
account |
|
|
servicing |
|
|
Retained |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Interests |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
21,422 |
|
|
$ |
6,278 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
5,992 |
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,899 |
|
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
27,564 |
|
|
$ |
6,030 |
|
|
$ |
43,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,075 |
|
|
$ |
3,990 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
Total net gains included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
22,293 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,670 |
|
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
27,564 |
|
|
$ |
6,030 |
|
|
$ |
43,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income for trading account securities is recognized as a component of trading income in
non-interest income and changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a
component of mortgage banking revenue in non-interest income. Income for retained interests
is recorded as a component of gain on sales of premium finance receivables or miscellaneous
income in non-interest income. |
29
The changes in Level 3 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available- |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for-sale |
|
|
account |
|
|
servicing |
|
|
Retained |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
securities |
|
|
securities |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Interests |
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
149,188 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
4,896 |
|
|
$ |
5,264 |
|
Total net gains (losses) included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
875 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
9,593 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,152 |
) |
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(110,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
48,712 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
95,514 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
4,730 |
|
|
$ |
4,480 |
|
Total net gains included in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
5,728 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net |
|
|
220,307 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,221 |
) |
Net transfers into/(out) of Level 3 |
|
|
(267,109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
48,712 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in the balance of mortgage servicing rights are recorded as a component of mortgage
banking revenue in non-interest income while gains for retained interests are recorded as a
component of gain on sales of premium finance receivables in non-interest income. |
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other financial
assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These adjustments to fair
value usually result from application of lower of cost or market accounting or impairment charges
of individual assets. For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still
held in the balance sheet at the end of the period, the following table provides the carrying value
of the related individual assets or portfolios at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Losses |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Recognized |
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
148,008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
148,008 |
|
|
$ |
67,971 |
|
|
$ |
77,982 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
40,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,639 |
|
|
|
7,527 |
|
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
188,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
188,647 |
|
|
$ |
75,498 |
|
|
$ |
85,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due pursuant to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by estimating the fair value of
the loan based on the present value of expected cash flows, the market price of the loan, or the
fair value of the underlying collateral. As stated in ASC 820 , impaired loans are considered a
fair value measurement where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral.
Appraised values, which may require adjustments to market-based valuation inputs, are generally
used on real estate collateral-dependant impaired loans.
30
Other real estate owned Other real estate owned is comprised of real estate acquired in partial
or full satisfaction of loans and is included in other assets. Other real estate owned is recorded
at its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, with any excess
of the related loan balance over the fair value less expected selling costs charged to the
allowance for loan losses. Subsequent changes in value are reported as adjustments to the carrying
amount and are recorded in other non-interest expense. Gains and losses upon sale, if any, are also
charged to other non-interest expense. Fair value is generally based on third party appraisals and
internal estimates and is therefore considered a Level 3 valuation.
In accordance with ASC 825, on a quarterly basis the Company is now required to report the fair
value of all financial instruments on the consolidated statement of condition, including those
financial instruments carried at cost. The fair value estimates, methods and assumptions set forth
below for the Companys financial instruments are made solely to comply with the requirements of
ASC 825 and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in this
quarterly report. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009 |
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
151,761 |
|
|
|
151,761 |
|
|
|
445,904 |
|
|
|
445,904 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
|
1,168,362 |
|
|
|
1,168,362 |
|
|
|
123,009 |
|
|
|
123,009 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,434,248 |
|
|
|
1,434,248 |
|
|
|
784,673 |
|
|
|
784,673 |
|
Trading account securities |
|
|
29,204 |
|
|
|
29,204 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
Brokerage customer receivables |
|
|
19,441 |
|
|
|
19,441 |
|
|
|
17,901 |
|
|
|
17,901 |
|
Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value |
|
|
187,505 |
|
|
|
187,505 |
|
|
|
51,029 |
|
|
|
51,029 |
|
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
5,808 |
|
|
|
10,087 |
|
|
|
10,207 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
8,275,257 |
|
|
|
8,503,841 |
|
|
|
7,621,069 |
|
|
|
7,988,028 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
|
|
3,990 |
|
Nonqualified deferred compensation assets |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
Retained interests from the
sale/securitization of premium finance
receivables |
|
|
43,958 |
|
|
|
43,958 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
11,429 |
|
|
|
11,429 |
|
|
|
9,572 |
|
|
|
9,572 |
|
Accrued interest receivable and other |
|
|
134,807 |
|
|
|
134,807 |
|
|
|
114,737 |
|
|
|
114,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets |
|
$ |
11,470,412 |
|
|
|
11,699,054 |
|
|
|
9,189,878 |
|
|
|
9,556,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-maturity deposits |
|
$ |
5,004,564 |
|
|
|
5,004,564 |
|
|
|
3,976,003 |
|
|
|
3,976,003 |
|
Deposits with stated maturities |
|
|
4,842,599 |
|
|
|
4,897,407 |
|
|
|
4,400,747 |
|
|
|
4,432,388 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
433,983 |
|
|
|
450,038 |
|
|
|
435,981 |
|
|
|
484,528 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
252,071 |
|
|
|
252,071 |
|
|
|
336,764 |
|
|
|
336,764 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
248,448 |
|
|
|
249,515 |
|
|
|
205,252 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
29,798 |
|
|
|
29,798 |
|
|
|
29,185 |
|
|
|
29,185 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
20,246 |
|
|
|
20,246 |
|
|
|
18,533 |
|
|
|
18,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities |
|
$ |
10,898,754 |
|
|
|
10,968,572 |
|
|
|
9,517,728 |
|
|
|
9,553,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of
financial instruments that were not previously disclosed.
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and demand balances from banks,
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The carrying value of cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments.
Interest bearing deposits with banks. The carrying value of interest bearing deposits with banks
approximates fair value due to the short maturity of those instruments.
31
Brokerage customer receivables. The carrying value of brokerage customer receivables approximates
fair value due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or market. Fair value is based on either quoted prices for
the same or similar loans, or values obtained from third parties, or is estimated for portfolios of
loans with similar financial characteristics.
Loans. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.
Loans are analyzed by type such as commercial, residential real estate, etc. Each category is
further segmented by interest rate type (fixed and variable) and term. For variable-rate loans that
reprice frequently, estimated fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of
residential loans is based on secondary market sources for securities backed by similar loans,
adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value for other fixed rate loans is
estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market
discount rates that reflect credit and interest rate risks inherent in the loan. The primary
impact of credit risk on the present value of the loan portfolio, however, was accommodated through
the use of the allowance for loan losses, which is believed to represent the current fair value of
probable incurred losses for purposes of the fair value calculation.
Accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable. The carrying values of accrued interest
receivable and accrued interest payable approximate market values due to the relatively short
period of time to expected realization.
Deposit liabilities. The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest
bearing deposits, savings, NOW accounts and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable
on demand as of period-end (i.e. the carrying value). The fair value of certificates of deposit is
based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the
rates currently in effect for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Notes payable. The carrying value of notes payable approximates fair value due to the relatively
short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank advances is obtained from
the Federal Home Loan Bank which uses a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market rates
of similar maturity debt securities to discount cash flows.
Subordinated notes. The carrying value of the subordinated notes payable approximates fair value
due to the relatively short period of time to repricing of variable interest rates.
Other borrowings. Carrying value of other borrowings approximates fair value due to the relatively
short period of time to maturity or repricing.
Junior subordinated debentures. The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is based on
the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
32
(16) Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan), which was approved by the Companys shareholders
in January 2007, permits the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, rights
and restricted stock, as well as the conversion of outstanding options of acquired companies to
Wintrust options. The 2007 Plan initially provided for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of
common stock, and in May 2009 the Companys shareholders approved an additional 325,000 shares of
common stock that may be offered under the 2007 Plan. All grants made in 2007, 2008 and 2009 were
made pursuant to the 2007 Plan. As of September 30, 2009, 409,470 shares were available for future
grant. The 2007 Plan replaced the Wintrust Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the
1997 Plan) which had substantially similar terms. The 2007 Plan and the 1997 Plan are collectively
referred to as the Plans. The Plans cover substantially all employees of Wintrust.
The Company typically awards stock-based compensation in the form of stock options and restricted
share awards. Stock options typically provide the holder the option to purchase shares of
Wintrusts common stock at the fair market value of the stock on the date the options are granted.
Options generally vest ratably over a five-year period and expire at such time as the Compensation
Committee determines at the time of grant. The 2007 Plan provides for a maximum term of seven years
from the date of grant while the 1997 Plan provided for a maximum term of ten years. Restricted
shares entitle the holders to receive, at no cost, shares of the Companys common stock.
Restricted shares generally vest over periods of one to five years from the date of grant. Holders
of the restricted shares are not entitled to vote or receive cash dividends (or cash payments equal
to the cash dividends) on the underlying common shares until the awards are vested. Except in
limited circumstances, these awards are canceled upon termination of employment without any payment
of consideration by the Company.
Compensation cost charged to income for stock options was $830,000 and $1.2 million in the third
quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $2.6 million and $3.6 million for the year-to-date
periods of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Compensation cost charged to income for restricted shares
was $872,000 in the third quarter of 2009 and $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2008, and $2.6
million and $4.0 million for the year-to-date periods of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Stock based compensation is recognized based upon the number of awards that are ultimately expected
to vest. As a result, recognized compensation expense for stock options and restricted share awards
was reduced for estimated forfeitures prior to vesting. Forfeiture rates are estimated for each
type of award based on historical forfeiture experience. Estimated forfeitures will be reassessed
in subsequent periods and may change based on new facts and circumstances.
Stock-based compensation cost is measured as the fair value of an award on the date of grant and is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The fair value of restricted shares is
determined based on the average of the high and low trading prices on the grant date. The fair
value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model
that utilizes the assumptions outlined in the following table. Option-pricing models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions and are sensitive to changes in the options expected life
and the price volatility of the underlying stock, which can materially affect the fair value
estimate. Expected life is based on historical exercise and termination behavior as well as the
term of the option, and expected stock price volatility is based on historical volatility of the
Companys common stock, which correlates with the expected term of the options. The risk-free
interest rate is based on comparable U.S. Treasury rates. Management reviews and adjusts the
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of an option on a periodic basis to better reflect
expected trends. The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to determine
the fair value of options granted in the nine months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
45.7 |
% |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
Risk-free rate |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Expected option life (in years) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
33
A summary of stock option activity under the Plans for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and September 30, 2008 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Common |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Value (2) |
Stock Options |
|
Shares |
|
Strike Price |
|
Term (1) |
|
($000) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
2,388,174 |
|
|
$ |
35.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
43,500 |
|
|
|
17.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(174,863 |
) |
|
|
11.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(72,879 |
) |
|
|
34.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2,183,932 |
|
|
|
37.20 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,491 |
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,833,581 |
|
|
|
36.44 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,029 |
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
2,505,181 |
|
|
$ |
34.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
57,450 |
|
|
|
31.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(129,435 |
) |
|
|
15.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(27,595 |
) |
|
|
48.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,405,601 |
|
|
|
35.57 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
11,493 |
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,832,550 |
|
|
|
32.08 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
11,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the weighted average contractual life remaining in years. |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (i.e., the
difference between the Companys average of the high and low stock price on the last trading
day of the quarter and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares) that
would have been received by the option holders if they had exercised their options on the last
day of the quarter. This amount will change based on the fair market value of the Companys
stock. |
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options granted during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $6.92 and $10.98, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value
of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was $1.9 million and
$2.2 million, respectively.
A summary of restricted share award activity under the Plans for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Common |
|
Grant-Date |
Restricted Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
262,997 |
|
|
$ |
44.09 |
|
|
|
308,627 |
|
|
$ |
48.16 |
|
Granted |
|
|
18,550 |
|
|
|
20.01 |
|
|
|
60,556 |
|
|
|
29.78 |
|
Vested (shares issued) |
|
|
(73,798 |
) |
|
|
40.64 |
|
|
|
(83,761 |
) |
|
|
49.18 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,625 |
) |
|
|
30.56 |
|
|
|
(4,984 |
) |
|
|
40.25 |
|
|
Outstanding at September 30 |
|
|
206,124 |
|
|
|
43.37 |
|
|
|
280,438 |
|
|
|
44.04 |
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company began paying a portion of the base pay of certain
executives in the Companys stock. Shares issued under this arrangement are granted under the Plan.
As of September 30, 2009, 1,588 shares were granted under this arrangement at an average stock
price of $27.55 per share. The number of shares granted as of each payroll date is based on the
average of the high and low price of Wintrusts common stock on such date.
As of September 30, 2009, there was $6.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share based arrangements under the Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of approximately two years.
The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises, vesting of restricted shares and
issuance of base pay salary shares.
34
(17) Shareholders Equity and Earnings Per Share
Series A Preferred Stock
In August 2008, the Company issued and sold 50,000 shares of non-cumulative perpetual
convertible preferred stock, Series A, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Series A
Preferred Stock) for $50 million in a private transaction. If declared, dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock
are payable quarterly in arrears at a rate of 8.00% per annum. The Series A Preferred Stock is
convertible into common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 38.88 shares of
common stock per share of Series A Preferred Stock. On and after August 26, 2010, the Series A Preferred
Stock will be subject to mandatory conversion into common stock in connection with a fundamental
transaction, or on and after August 26, 2013 if the closing price of the Companys common stock
exceeds a certain amount.
Series B Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the U.S. Department of the Treasurys (the U.S. Treasury) Capital Purchase Program,
on December 19, 2008, the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury, in exchange for aggregate
consideration of $250 million, (i) 250,000 shares of the Companys fixed rate cumulative perpetual
preferred Stock, Series B, liquidation preference $1,000 per share (the Series B Preferred
Stock), and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,643,295 shares of Wintrust common stock at a per share
exercise price of $22.82 and with a term of 10 years. The Series B Preferred Stock will pay a
cumulative dividend at a coupon rate of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter. The Series B
Preferred Stock can, with the approval of the Federal Reserve, be redeemed.
The relative fair values of the preferred stock and the warrant issued to the U.S. Treasury in
conjunction with the Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program were determined
through an analysis, as of the valuation date of December 19, 2008, of the fair value of the
warrants and the fair value of the preferred stock, and an allocation of the relative fair value of
each to the $250 million of total proceeds.
The fair value of the warrant was determined using a binomial lattice valuation model. The
assumptions used in arriving at the fair value of the warrant using that valuation method, derived
as of the valuation date, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Company stock price as of the valuation date |
|
$ |
20.06 |
|
Contractual strike price of warrant |
|
$ |
22.82 |
|
Expected term based on contractual term |
|
10 years |
|
Expected volatility based on 10-year historical volatility of the Companys stock |
|
|
37 |
% |
Expected annual dividend yield |
|
|
1 |
% |
Risk-free rate based on 10-year U.S. Treasury strip rate |
|
|
2.72 |
% |
Using that model, each of the 1,643,295 shares underlying the warrant was valued at $8.33 and,
correspondingly, the aggregate fair value of the warrant was $13.7 million.
The fair value of the preferred stock was determined using a discounted cash flow model which
discounted the contractual principal balance of $250 million and the contractual dividend payment
of 5% for the first five years at a 13% discount rate. The discount rate was derived from the
average and median yields on existing fixed rate preferred stock issuances of eleven different
commercial banks in the central United States, which average and median results approximated 13% on
the date of valuation. Using this methodology, the fair value of the preferred stock was estimated
to be $181.8 million.
In relative terms, a summary of the above valuation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair value of preferred stock |
|
$181.8 million |
|
|
93.0 |
% |
Fair value of warrants |
|
$ 13.7 million |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$195.5 million |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
35
Applying the relative value percentages of 93% for the preferred stock and 7% for the warrants to
the total proceeds of $250 million, the resulting valuation of the preferred stock and warrants is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds allocated to Preferred Stock ($250 million multiplied by 93%) |
|
$232.5 million |
Proceeds allocated to Warrants ($250 million multiplied by 7%) |
|
$17.5 million |
For as long as any shares of Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, the ability of the Company
to declare or pay dividends or distributions on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for
consideration, shares of its common stock or other securities, including trust preferred
securities, will be subject to restrictions. The U.S. Treasurys consent is required for any
increase in common dividends per share from the amount of the Companys semiannual cash dividend of
$0.18 per share, until the third anniversary of the purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury
unless prior to such third anniversary the Series B Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the
U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to third parties.
Earnings per Share
The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,995 |
|
|
$ |
(2,448 |
) |
|
$ |
44,902 |
|
|
$ |
18,533 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
14,668 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares Basic |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
27,327 |
|
|
|
(2,992 |
) |
|
|
30,234 |
|
|
|
17,989 |
|
Add: Dividends on convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common shares Diluted |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
28,327 |
|
|
|
(2,992 |
) |
|
|
30,234 |
|
|
|
17,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
(C |
) |
|
|
24,052 |
|
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
23,958 |
|
|
|
23,590 |
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and effect of dilutive
potential common shares |
|
|
(D |
) |
|
|
26,545 |
|
|
|
23,644 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
24,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
(A/C |
) |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
(B/D |
) |
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potentially dilutive common shares can result from stock options, restricted stock unit
awards, stock warrants (including the warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury), the Companys
convertible preferred stock and shares to be issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
Directors Deferred Fee and Stock Plan, being treated as if they had been either exercised or
issued, computed by application of the treasury stock method. While potentially dilutive common
shares are typically included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, potentially
dilutive common shares are excluded from this computation in periods in which the effect would
reduce the loss per share or increase the income per share. For diluted earnings per share, net
income applicable to common shares can be affected by the conversion of the Companys convertible
preferred stock. Where the effect of this conversion would reduce the loss per share or increase
the income per share, net income applicable to common shares is adjusted by the associated
preferred dividends.
36
(18) Subsequent Events
As discussed in Note 3 Business Combinations, on July 28, 2009, FIFC purchased of a majority of
the U.S. life insurance premium finance assets of A.I. Credit Corp. and A.I. Credit Consumer
Discount Company, subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. At that time, an aggregate of
$84.4 million of additional life insurance premium finance assets were available for future
purchase by FIFC subject to satisfying certain conditions. On October 2, 2009, the conditions were
satisfied in relation to the majority of the additional life insurance premium finance assets which
were available for purchase and FIFC purchased $83.4 million of the $84.4 million of life insurance
premium finance assets available for an aggregate purchase price of $60.5 million. The Company
anticipates recording an additional $14.5 million bargain purchase gain relating to this additional
purchase, all of which will be immediately recognizable in the fourth quarter. The difference
between the fair value of these loans acquired on October 2, 2009 and the outstanding principal
balance of theses loans represents a discount of $8.4 million and is comprised of two components,
an accretable component totaling $5.7 million and a
non-accretable component totaling $2.7 million. The impact related to this transaction will be included in Wintrusts consolidated financial
results only since the effective date of acquisition.
On October 30, 2009, the Company established a $25 million revolving credit facility and a $1
million term facility, the terms of which are set forth in an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
dated as of October 30, 2009 (the Credit Agreement) among Wintrust, the lenders named therein,
and an unaffiliated bank as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement replaces Wintrusts prior
credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank. All borrowings under the revolving credit facility
must be repaid by October 29, 2010. All borrowings under the term facility must be repaid by June
1, 2015. As of the date hereof, Wintrust has no outstanding balance under the revolving credit
facility and has $1 million outstanding under the term facility. Borrowings under the Credit
Agreement are available for general corporate purposes and are secured by pledges of and first
priority perfected security interests in the Companys equity interest in certain of its bank
subsidiaries.
37
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition as of September 30, 2009, compared
with December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, and the results of operations for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, should be read in conjunction with the our unaudited
consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this report. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and, as such, future results could
differ significantly from managements current expectations. See the last section of this
discussion for further information on forward-looking statements.
Introduction
Wintrust is a financial holding company that provides traditional community banking services,
primarily in the Chicago metropolitan area and southeastern Wisconsin, and operates other financing
businesses on a national basis through several non-bank subsidiaries. Additionally, Wintrust
offers a full array of wealth management services primarily to customers in the Chicago
metropolitan area and southeastern Wisconsin.
Overview
Community Banking
As of September 30, 2009, our community banking franchise consisted of 15 community banks (the
banks) with 78 locations. Through these banks, we provide banking and financial services
primarily to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional
clients residing primarily in the banks local service areas. These services include traditional
deposit products such as demand, NOW, money market, savings and time deposit accounts, as well as a
number of unique deposit products targeted to specific market segments. The banks also offer home
equity, home mortgage, consumer, real estate and commercial loans, safe deposit facilities, ATMs,
internet banking and other innovative and traditional services specially tailored to meet the needs
of customers in their market areas.
Profitability of our community banking franchise is primarily driven by our net interest income and
margin, our funding mix and related costs, the level of non-performing loans and other real estate
owned, the amount of mortgage banking revenue and our history of establishing de novo banks.
Net interest income and margin. The primary source of the our revenue is net interest income. Net
interest income is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets, such as loans
and securities, and interest expense on liabilities to fund those assets, including deposits and
other borrowings. Net interest income can change significantly from period to period based on
general levels of interest rates, customer prepayment patterns, the mix of interest-earning assets
and the mix of interest-bearing and non-interest bearing deposits and borrowings.
Funding mix and related costs. Our most significant source of funding is core deposits, which are
comprised of non-interest-bearing deposits, non-brokered interest-bearing transaction accounts,
savings deposits and domestic time deposits. Our branch network is our principal source of core
deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than wholesale funds of comparable maturities.
Our profitability has been bolstered in recent quarters as fixed term certificates of deposit
have been renewing at lower rates given the historically low interest rate levels in place recently
and particularly since the fourth quarter of 2008.
Level of non-performing loans and other real estate owned. The level of non-performing loans and
other real estate owned can significantly impact our profitability as these loans do not accrue any
income, can be subject to charge-offs and write-downs due to deteriorating market conditions and
generally result in additional legal and collections expenses. Given the current economic
conditions, these costs have been trending higher in recent quarters.
38
Mortgage banking revenue. Our community banking franchise is also influenced by the level of fees
generated by the origination of residential mortgages and the sale of such mortgages into the
secondary market. This revenue is significantly impacted by the level of interest rates associated
with home mortgages. Recently, such interest rates have been historically low and customer
refinancings have been high, resulting in increased fee revenue. Additionally, in December 2008,
we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of the mortgage banking business of
Professional Mortgage Partners (PMP) for an initial cash purchase price of $1.4 million, plus
potential contingent consideration of up to $1.5 million per year in each of the following three
years dependent upon reaching certain earnings thresholds. As a result of the acquisition, we
significantly increased the capacity of our mortgage-origination operations, primarily in the
Chicago metropolitan market. The PMP transaction also changed the mix of our mortgage origination
business in the Chicago market, resulting in a relatively greater portion of that business being
retail, rather than wholesale, oriented. The primary risk of the PMP acquisition transaction
relates to the integration of a significant number of locations and staff members into our existing
mortgage operation during a period of increased mortgage refinancing activity. Costs in the
mortgage business are variable as they primarily relate to commissions paid to originators.
Establishment of de novo operations. Our historical financial performance has been affected by
costs associated with growing market share in deposits and loans, establishing and acquiring banks,
opening new branch facilities and building an experienced management team. Our financial
performance generally reflects the improved profitability of our banking subsidiaries as they
mature, offset by the costs of establishing and acquiring banks and opening new branch facilities.
From our experience, it generally takes over 13 months for new banks to achieve operational
profitability depending on the number and timing of branch facilities added.
In determining the timing of the formation of de novo banks, the opening of additional branches of
existing banks, and the acquisition of additional banks, we consider many factors, particularly our
perceived ability to obtain an adequate return on our invested capital driven largely by the then
existing cost of funds and lending margins, the general economic climate and the level of
competition in a given market. We began to slow the rate of growth of new locations in 2007 due to
tightening net interest margins on new business which, in the opinion of management, did not
provide enough net interest spread to be able to garner a sufficient return on our invested
capital. Since the second quarter of 2008, we have not established a new banking location either
through a de novo opening or through an acquisition, due to the financial system crisis and
recessionary economy and our decision to utilize our capital to support our existing franchise
rather than deploy our capital for expansion through new locations which tend to operate at a loss
in the early months of operation. Thus, while expansion activity during the past three years has
been at a level below earlier periods in our history, we expect to resume de novo bank openings,
formation of additional branches and acquisitions of additional banks when favorable market
conditions return.
In addition to the factors considered above, before we engage in expansion through de novo branches
or banks we must first make a determination that the expansion fulfills our objective of enhancing
shareholder value through potential future earnings growth and enhancement of the overall franchise
value of the Company. Generally, we believe that, in normal market conditions, expansion through
de novo growth is a better long-term investment than acquiring banks because the cost to bring a de
novo location to profitability is generally substantially less than the premium paid for the
acquisition of a healthy bank. Each opportunity to expand is unique from a cost and benefit
perspective. Factors including the valuation of our stock, other economic market conditions, the
size and scope of the particular expansion opportunity and competitive landscape all influence the
decision to expand via de novo growth or through acquisition.
Specialty Finance
Through our specialty finance segment, we offer financing of insurance premiums for businesses and
individuals; accounts receivable financing, value-added, out-sourced administrative services; and
other specialty finance businesses. We conduct our specialty finance businesses through indirect
non-bank subsidiaries. Our wholly owned subsidiary, First Insurance Funding Corporation (FIFC)
engages in the premium finance receivables business, our most significant specialized lending
niche, including commercial insurance premium finance and life insurance premium finance.
39
Financing of Commercial Insurance Premiums
FIFC
originated approximately $900 million in commercial insurance premium finance receivables
during the third quarter of 2009. FIFC makes loans to businesses to finance the insurance premiums
they pay on their commercial insurance policies. The loans are originated by FIFC working through
independent medium and large insurance agents and brokers located throughout the United States. The
insurance premiums financed are primarily for commercial customers purchases of liability,
property and casualty and other commercial insurance.
This lending involves relatively rapid turnover of the loan portfolio and high volume of loan
originations. Because of the indirect nature of this lending and because the borrowers are located
nationwide, this segment may be more susceptible to third party fraud than relationship lending;
however, management has established various control procedures to mitigate the risks associated
with this lending. The majority of these loans are purchased by the banks in order to more fully
utilize their lending capacity as these loans generally provide the banks with higher yields than
alternative investments. Historically, FIFC originations that were not purchased by the banks were
sold to unrelated third parties with servicing retained. However, during the third quarter of
2009, FIFC initially sold $695 million in commercial premium finance receivables to our indirect
subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, which in turn sold $600 million in aggregate principal
amount of notes backed by such premium finance receivables in a securitization transaction
sponsored by FIFC.
The primary driver of profitability related to the financing of commercial insurance premiums is
the net interest spread that FIFC can produce between the yields on the loans generated and the
cost of funds allocated to the business unit. The commercial insurance premium finance business is
a competitive industry and yields on loans are influenced by the market rates offered by our
competitors. We fund these loans either through the securitization facility described above or
through our deposits, the cost of which is influenced by competitors in the retail banking markets
in the Chicago and Milwaukee metropolitan areas.
Financing of Life Insurance Premiums
In 2007, FIFC began financing life insurance policy premiums generally for high net-worth
individuals. These loans are originated directly with the borrowers with assistance from life
insurance carriers, independent insurance agents, financial advisors and legal counsel. The life
insurance policy is the primary form of collateral. In addition, these loans often are secured
with a letter of credit, marketable securities or certificates of deposit. In some cases, FIFC may
make a loan that has a partially unsecured position. In July 2009, FIFC expanded this niche
lending business segment when it purchased a portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance
loans from certain affiliates of American International Group for an aggregate purchase price of
$685.3 million. At closing, a portion of the portfolio, with an aggregate unpaid principal balance
of approximately $321.1 million, and a corresponding portion of the purchase price of approximately
$232.8 million were placed in escrow, pending the receipt of required third party consents.
As with the commercial premium finance business, the primary driver of profitability related to the
financing of life insurance premiums is the net interest spread that FIFC can produce between the
yields on the loans generated and the cost of funds allocated to the business unit.
Profitability of financing both commercial and life insurance premiums is also meaningfully
impacted by leveraging information technology systems, maintaining operational efficiency and
increasing average loan size, each of which allows us to expand our loan volume without significant
capital investment.
Wealth Management
We currently offer a full range of wealth management services through three separate subsidiaries,
including trust and investment services, asset management and securities brokerage services,
marketed primarily under the Wayne Hummer name.
40
The primary influences on the profitability of the wealth management business can be associated
with the level of commission received related to the trading performed by the brokerage customers
for their accounts; and the amount of assets under management for which asset management and trust
units receive a management fee for advisory, administrative and custodial services. As such,
revenues are influenced by a rise or fall in the debt and equity markets and the resultant increase
or decrease in the value of our client accounts on which are fees are based. The commissions
received by the brokerage unit are not as directly influenced by the directionality of the debt and
equity markets but rather the desire of our customers to engage in trading based on their
particular situations and outlooks of the market or particular stocks and bonds. Profitability in
the brokerage business is impacted by commissions which fluctuate over time.
Federal Government, Federal Reserve and FDIC Programs
Since October of 2008, the federal government, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the New York
Fed) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) have made a number of programs
available to banks and other financial institutions in an effort to ensure a well-functioning U.S.
financial system. We participate in three of these programs: the Capital Purchase Program,
administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury), the Term Asset-Backed Securities
Loan Facility (TALF), created by the New York Fed, and the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
(TLGP), created by the FDIC.
Participation in Capital Purchase Program. In October 2008, the Treasury announced that it
intended to use a portion of the initial funds allocated to it pursuant to the Troubled Asset
Relief Program (TARP), created by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, to invest
directly in financial institutions through the newly-created Capital Purchase Program (CPP). At
that time, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson stated that the program was designed to attract
broad participation by healthy institutions which have plenty of capital to get through this
period, but are not positioned to lend as widely as is necessary to support our economy.
Our management believed at the time of the CPP investment, as it does now, that Treasurys CPP
investment was not necessary for the Companys short or long-term health. However, the CPP
investment presented an opportunity for us. By providing us with a significant source of
relatively inexpensive capital, the Treasurys CPP investment allows us to accelerate our growth
cycle and expand lending.
Consequently, we applied for CPP funds and our application was accepted by Treasury. As a result,
on December 19, 2008, we entered into an agreement with the U.S. Department of the Treasury to
participate in Treasurys CPP, pursuant to which we issued and sold preferred stock and a warrant
to Treasury in exchange for aggregate consideration of $250 million (the CPP investment). As a
result of the CPP investment, our total risk-based capital ratio as of December 31, 2008 increased
from 10.3% to 13.1%. To be considered well capitalized, we must maintain a total risk-based
capital ratio in excess of 10%.
The terms of our agreement with Treasury impose significant restrictions upon us, including
increased scrutiny by Treasury, banking regulators and Congress, additional corporate governance
requirements, restrictions upon our ability to repurchase stock and pay dividends and, as a result
of increasingly stringent regulations issued by Treasury following the closing of the CPP
investment, significant restrictions upon executive compensation. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement between Treasury and us, Treasury is permitted to amend the agreement unilaterally in
order to comply with any changes in applicable federal statutes.
The CPP investment provided the Company with additional capital resources which in turn permitted
the expansion of the flow of credit to U.S. consumers and businesses beyond what we would have done
without the CPP funding. The capital itself is not loaned to our borrowers but represents
additional shareholders equity that has been leveraged by the Company to permit it to provide new
loans to qualified borrowers and raise deposits to fund the additional lending without incurring
excessive risk.
41
Due to the combination of our prior decisions in appropriately managing our risks, the capital
support provided from the August 2008 private issuance of $50 million of convertible preferred
stock and the additional capital support from the CPP, we have been able to take advantage of
opportunities when they have arisen and our banks continue to be active lenders within their
communities. Without the additional funds from the CPP, our prudent management philosophy and
strict underwriting standards likely would have required us to continue to restrain lending due to
the need to preserve capital during these uncertain economic conditions. While many other banks
saw 2009 as a year of retraction or stagnation as it relates to lending activities, the capital
from the CPP positioned Wintrust to make 2009 a year in which we expanded our lending.
Specifically, since the receipt of the CPP funds, we have funded in excess of $7.8 billion of
loans, including funding of new loans, advances on prior commitments and renewals of maturing
loans, consisting of over 146,000 individual credits. These loans are to a wide variety of
businesses and we consider such loans to be essential to assisting growth in the economy. On a net
basis, the CPP capital helped enable us to increase our total loans from $7.6 billion as of
December 31, 2008 to $8.3 billion as of September 30, 2009 and to increase deposits to fund those
loans from $8.4 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $9.8 billion as of September 30, 2009.
In connection with our participation in the CPP, we have committed to expand the flow of credit to
U.S. consumers and businesses on competitive terms, and to work to modify the terms of residential
mortgages as appropriate. The following tables set forth quarterly information regarding our
efforts to comply with these commitments since we received the CPP investment on December 19, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
Quarter ended |
|
Quarter ended |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Consumer Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of new and renewed loans originated |
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
Aggregate amount of loans originated |
|
$ |
61,806 |
|
|
$ |
92,833 |
|
|
$ |
54,002 |
|
Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of new and renewed loans originated |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
Aggregate amount of loans originated |
|
$ |
305,865 |
|
|
$ |
414,179 |
|
|
$ |
551,500 |
|
Residential Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of new and renewed loans originated |
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
6,735 |
|
|
|
5,230 |
|
Aggregate amount of loans originated |
|
$ |
984,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,552,442 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,465 |
|
Commercial premium Finance Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of new and renewed loans originated |
|
|
40,995 |
|
|
|
40,663 |
|
|
|
38,173 |
|
Aggregate amount of loans originated |
|
$ |
910,923 |
|
|
$ |
930,921 |
|
|
$ |
892,127 |
|
To date, Wintrust generally has not modified the terms of residential mortgages.
We have no present plans to repay the CPP investment, but believe that we have the ability to
conduct an equity offering that would allow us to make such repayment. Accordingly, we intend to
remain focused on investing the proceeds of the CPP investment, and will only seek to repay such
investment when we believe doing so is in the best interests of our shareholders.
For additional information on the terms of the preferred stock and the warrant, see Note 17 of the
Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report.
TALF-Eligible Issuance. In September 2009, our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC,
sold $600 million in aggregate principal amount of its Series 2009-A Premium Finance Asset Backed
Notes, Class A (the Notes), which were issued in a securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC.
FIFC Premium Funding I, LLCs obligations under the Notes are secured by revolving loans made to
buyers of property and casualty insurance policies to finance the related premiums payable by the
buyers to the insurance companies for the policies.
42
At the time of issuance, the Notes were eligible collateral under TALF and certain investors
therefore received non-recourse funding from the New York Fed in order to purchase the Notes. As a
result, FIFC believes it received greater proceeds at lower interest rates from the securitization
than it otherwise would have received in non-TALF-eligible transactions. As a result, if TALF is
not renewed or is allowed to expire, it is possible that funding our growth will be more costly if
we pursue similar transactions in the future. However, as is true in the case of the CPP
investment, management views the TALF-eligible securitization as a funding mechanism offering us
the ability to accelerate our growth plan, rather than one essential to the maintenance of our
well capitalized status.
TLGP Guarantee. In November 2008, the FDIC adopted a final rule establishing the TLGP. The TLGP
provided two limited guarantee programs: One, the Debt Guarantee Program, that guaranteed
newly-issued senior unsecured debt, and another, the Transaction Account Guarantee program (TAG)
that guaranteed certain non-interest-bearing transaction accounts at insured depository
institutions. All insured depository institutions that offer non-interest-bearing transaction
accounts had the option to participate in either program. We did not participate in the Debt
Guarantee Program.
In December 2008, each of our subsidiary banks elected to participate in the TAG, which provides
unlimited FDIC insurance coverage for the entire account balance in exchange for an additional
insurance premium to be paid by the depository institution for accounts with balances in excess of
the current FDIC insurance limit of $250,000. This additional insurance coverage would continue
through December 31, 2009. In October 2009, the FDIC notified depository institutions that it was
extending the TAG program for an additional six months until June 30, 2010 at the option of
participating banks. Our subsidiary banks have determined that it is in their best interest to
continue participation in the TAG program and have opted to participate for the additional
six-month period.
Business Outlook
Recent Performance
We recorded net income of $32.0 million, or $1.07 per diluted share, for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $6.5 million of net income, or $0.06 per diluted common share,
recorded in the second quarter of 2009. Compared to the third quarter of 2008, earnings per diluted
common share increased $1.20 per share, on a $34.4 million increase in net income. Earnings per
diluted common share in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 were
reduced by preferred stock dividends including discount accretion, related to our issuances of
preferred stock in the second half of 2008, reducing net income available to common shareholders by
$4.1 million, or $0.15 per diluted common share.
Management believes it made good progress on many strategic initiatives during a very active
quarter. The acquisition of the life insurance premium finance portfolio was accounted for as a
business combination and resulted in a bargain purchase gain of which $113.1 million was recognized
in the third quarter of 2009. Management anticipates the Company will recognize additional bargain
purchase gains on this portfolio in subsequent quarters to the extent that third party consents are
obtained with respect to certain loans in the portfolio. The securitization of a portion of our
commercial premium finance loan portfolio enhanced our regulatory capital position, balance sheet
liquidity and earnings.
Our net interest margin for the quarter increased to 3.25% from 2.91% in the second quarter and
2.74% in the third quarter of 2008 reflecting positive results from both deposit and asset
re-pricing and solid balance sheet growth at reasonable and commensurate pricing levels. Fee and
other income remained relatively strong while expenses, other than credit related expenses, were in
line with expectations.
43
In regard to credit quality trends, we recorded a provision for credit losses of approximately
$91 million to accommodate net charge-offs of approximately $80 million during the quarter. In
addition to these charge-offs, we also recorded approximately $10 million of expense related to
write downs of other real estate owned (OREO). Approximately $29 million of the quarters
charge-offs relate to loans where specific reserves had previously been established. Approximately
$12 million of the charge-offs related to either dispositions or new problem assets. The remaining
$39 million related to continued downward revaluation of collateral values primarily related to
real estate development. This revaluation, along with the $10 million OREO charge, can be
attributed to our commitment to liquidate problem assets in a very aggressive manner and, more
importantly, to very recent changes in overall market conditions. As an increasing amount of
troubled assets are being liquidated in the market as a whole, the appraised values are dropping
accordingly, reflecting the adverse impact of the additional supply. These reduced valuations are
further supported by liquidation bids which we have received on our portfolio of non-performing
assets.
Our allowance for loan losses increased to $95.1 million or 1.15% of total loans. Adding our
reserve for lending-related commitments and credit discount on purchased assets brings total credit
reserves and discounts to $134.4 million or 1.62% of total loans. Management believes the
allowance for loan losses is adequate given existing knowledge of our loan portfolio. However, if
the valuation of real estate declines further, we may need to provide for additional potential
losses in future quarters.
Total non-performing assets decreased $7.4 million from the prior quarter end. Quarter-end
non-performing loans include approximately $17 million of administrative past due loans that were
subsequently cleared in October 2009. Management plans to continue its aggressive disposition of
problem assets in the fourth quarter.
We continue to focus on increasing core earnings and clearing the balance sheet of problem assets.
Core earning opportunities remain in the areas of deposit re-pricing, core franchise growth and
liquidity redeployment. At quarter end, we had in excess of $1 billion in liquid assets and were
operating at an 84% loan to deposit ratiojust below the low end of our desired 85% to 90% range.
44
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings Summary
The Companys key operating measures for 2009, as compared to the same period last year, are shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Percentage (%) or |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Basis Point (bp) |
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Change |
Net income |
|
$ |
31,995 |
|
|
$ |
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
1,407 |
% |
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (1) |
|
|
238,343 |
|
|
|
82,810 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
87,663 |
|
|
|
60,680 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
51 |
bp |
Net overhead ratio (3) |
|
|
(1.95 |
) |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
Efficiency ratio (2) (4) |
|
|
38.69 |
|
|
|
76.64 |
|
|
|
(3,795 |
) |
Return on average assets |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
(1.59 |
) |
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
Percentage (%) or |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Basis Point (bp) |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Change |
Net income |
|
$ |
44,902 |
|
|
$ |
18,533 |
|
|
|
142 |
% |
Net income per common share Diluted |
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (1) |
|
|
457,501 |
|
|
|
262,127 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
224,942 |
|
|
|
181,822 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
15 |
bp |
Net overhead ratio (3) |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Efficiency ratio (2) (4) |
|
|
55.15 |
|
|
|
72.28 |
|
|
|
(1,713 |
) |
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Return on average common equity |
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,136,021 |
|
|
$ |
9,864,920 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
8,275,257 |
|
|
|
7,322,545 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Total loans, including loans held-for-sale |
|
|
8,468,512 |
|
|
|
7,390,943 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
9,847,163 |
|
|
|
7,829,527 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,106,082 |
|
|
|
809,331 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share |
|
|
34.10 |
|
|
|
32.07 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Market price per common share |
|
|
27.96 |
|
|
|
29.35 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (5) |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
28 |
bp |
Total credit reserves to total loans (6) |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
71 |
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income. |
|
(2) |
|
See following section titled, Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional
information on this performance measure/ratio. |
|
(3) |
|
The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total
non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that periods total average
assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by tax-equivalent
net revenue (less securities gains or losses). A lower ratio indicates more efficient
revenue generation. |
|
(5) |
|
The allowance for credit losses includes both the allowance for loan losses and the
allowance for lending-related commitments. |
|
(6) |
|
The sum of allowance for credit losses and credit discounts on purchased loans divided by
total loans outstanding plus the credit discounts on purchased loans. |
Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, and quarterly growth rates are annualized in this
presentation and throughout this report to represent an annual time period. This is done for
analytical purposes to better discern for decision-making purposes underlying performance trends
when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, balance sheet growth rates are
most often expressed in terms of an annual rate. As such, 5% growth during a quarter would
represent an annualized growth rate of 20%.
45
Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios
The accounting and reporting polices of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry.
However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and
measure the Companys performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including
its individual components), net interest margin (including its individual components) and the
efficiency ratio. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the
Companys financial information with a more meaningful view of the performance of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Companys operating efficiency. Other financial
holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.
Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company
and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis. In this non-GAAP
presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an
equivalent before-tax basis. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising
from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the
calculation of the Companys efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by
dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or
losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses
are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational
expenses.
A reconciliation of certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios used by the Company to
evaluate and measure the Companys performance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial
measures is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
(A) Interest income (GAAP) |
|
$ |
141,577 |
|
|
$ |
126,569 |
|
|
$ |
390,785 |
|
|
$ |
388,905 |
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Liquidity management assets |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
Other earning assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
Interest income FTE |
|
$ |
142,092 |
|
|
$ |
127,146 |
|
|
$ |
392,489 |
|
|
$ |
390,797 |
|
(B) Interest expense (GAAP) |
|
|
53,914 |
|
|
|
65,889 |
|
|
|
165,843 |
|
|
|
207,083 |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income FTE |
|
$ |
88,178 |
|
|
$ |
61,257 |
|
|
$ |
226,646 |
|
|
$ |
183,714 |
|
|
|
|
(C) Net interest income (GAAP) (A minus B) |
|
$ |
87,663 |
|
|
$ |
60,680 |
|
|
$ |
224,942 |
|
|
$ |
181,822 |
|
|
|
|
(D) Net interest margin (GAAP) |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
Net interest margin FTE |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
(E) Efficiency ratio (GAAP) |
|
|
38.77 |
% |
|
|
77.18 |
% |
|
|
55.36 |
% |
|
|
72.80 |
% |
Efficiency ratio FTE |
|
|
38.69 |
% |
|
|
76.64 |
% |
|
|
55.15 |
% |
|
|
72.28 |
% |
46
Critical Accounting Policies
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States and prevailing practices of the banking industry.
Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain
policies and accounting principles inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions and judgments, and as such have a greater possibility that changes in those estimates
and assumptions could produce financial results that are materially different than originally
reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are
required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the
financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be
established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event, are
based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as
information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates and assumptions.
Management views critical accounting policies to be those which are highly dependent on subjective
or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, and where changes in those estimates and
assumptions could have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management currently
views critical accounting policies to include the determination of the allowance for loan losses
and the allowance for losses on lending-related commitments, estimations of fair value, the
valuations required for impairment testing of goodwill, the valuation and accounting for derivative
instruments and income taxes as the accounting areas that require the most subjective and complex
judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. For
a more detailed discussion on these critical accounting policies, see Summary of Critical
Accounting Policies beginning on page 36 of the Companys 2008 Form 10-K.
Net Income
Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $32.0 million, an increase of $34.4
million compared to the third quarter of 2008, and an increase of approximately $25.4 compared to
the second quarter of 2009. On a per share basis, net income for the third quarter of 2009 totaled
$1.07 per diluted common share, an increase of $1.20 per share as compared to the 2008 third
quarter net loss of $0.13 per diluted common share. Compared to the second quarter of 2009, net
income per diluted share in the third quarter of 2009 increased by $1.01.
The most significant factors affecting net income for the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the
same period in the prior year include a gain on bargain purchase as a result of the acquisition of
the A.I. Credit life insurance premium finance portfolio and an increase in the provision for
credit losses. Other items affecting the third quarter of 2009 results as compared to the same
period in the prior year include increased net interest income, higher mortgage banking revenues,
the increase in market value of collateralized mortgage obligations held in the Companys trading
portfolio and the gain on the sale of premium finance receivables, partially offset by an increase
in other real estate expenses, higher levels of mortgage banking commissions and lower levels of
option income. A higher level of preferred share dividends also contributed to lower diluted
earnings per share. The return on average equity for the third quarter of 2009 was 13.79%,
compared to (1.59)% for the prior year third quarter and 0.79% for the second quarter of 2009.
Net income for the first nine months of 2009 totaled $44.9 million, an increase of $26.4 million,
or 142%, compared to $18.5 million for the same period in 2008. On a per share basis, net income
per diluted common share was $1.25 for the first nine months of 2009, an increase of $0.50 per
share, or 67%, compared to $0.75 for the first nine months of 2008. Return on average equity for
the first nine months of 2009 was 5.16% versus 3.20% for the same period of 2008.
47
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which represents the difference between interest income and fees on earning
assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings, is the major source of earnings for the
Company. Interest rate fluctuations and the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income. Net interest margin represents
tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of the average earning assets during the period.
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the third quarter of 2009 as
compared to the third quarter of 2008 (linked quarters):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
2,078,330 |
|
|
$ |
15,403 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
$ |
1,544,465 |
|
|
$ |
18,247 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
21,687 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
8,665,281 |
|
|
|
126,541 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
7,343,845 |
|
|
|
108,637 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
10,768,485 |
|
|
$ |
142,092 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
$ |
8,909,997 |
|
|
$ |
127,146 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(85,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
109,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,004,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,797,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,881,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$
|
8,799,578 |
|
|
$ |
42,806 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
$ |
7,127,065 |
|
|
$ |
53,405 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
434,134 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
438,983 |
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
245,352 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
|
398,911 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
249,552 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
9,793,557 |
|
|
$ |
53,914 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
$ |
8,289,511 |
|
|
$ |
65,889 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
775,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
158,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,070,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
11,797,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,881,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
974,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
620,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,178 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,257 |
|
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a
tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total
adjustments for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $515,000 and $576,000,
respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average
interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free
funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
48
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $88.2 million,
an increase of $26.9 million, or 44%, as compared to the $61.3 million recorded in the same quarter
of 2008. For the third quarter of 2009, the net interest margin was 3.25%, up 51 basis points when
compared to the net interest margin of 2.74% in the same quarter of 2008.
The yield on total earning assets was 5.24% for the third quarter of 2009 and 5.68% in the third
quarter of 2008. The third quarter 2009 yield on loans was 5.79%, a 10 basis point decrease when
compared to the prior year third quarter yield of 5.89%. The yield on liquidity management assets
in the third quarter of 2009 was 2.94% compared to 4.70% in the third quarter of 2008.
The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.18% in the third quarter of 2009 and 3.16% in
the third quarter of 2008. The interest-bearing deposit rate in the third quarter of 2009 declined
105 basis points to 1.93% from a rate of 2.98% in the same quarter in 2008.
The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes
payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, increased to
4.41% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 4.24% in the third quarter of 2008. The Company
utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the banks, manage
capital, manage its interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.
The higher level of net interest income recorded in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third
quarter of 2008 was attributable to the impact of the life insurance premium finance loan purchase
and the ability to raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at lower rates. Average earning
asset growth of $1.9 billion in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 was
comprised of $1.3 billion of loan growth and $533.9 million of liquid management asset growth. The
$1.9 billion of earning asset growth was primarily funded by a $1.5 billion increase in the average
balances of interest-bearing liabilities.
In the third quarter of 2009, the yield on loans decreased 10 basis points and the rate on
interest-bearing deposits decreased 105 basis points compared to the third quarter of 2008. The
bulk of the small decrease in yield on loans is attributable to the low interest rate environment,
partially offset by higher yields from the purchase of the life insurance premium finance
receivables. Management believes opportunities remain for the increasing credit spreads in
commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios and for lower rates from the re-pricing of
maturing retail certificates of deposits, both of which should contribute to continued net interest
margin expansion.
49
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the third quarter of 2009 as
compared to the second quarter of 2009 (sequential quarters):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
2,078,330 |
|
|
$ |
15,403 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
$ |
1,851,179 |
|
|
$ |
17,102 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
22,694 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
8,665,281 |
|
|
|
126,541 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
8,212,572 |
|
|
|
110,412 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
10,768,485 |
|
|
$ |
142,092 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
$ |
10,086,445 |
|
|
$ |
127,699 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(85,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
109,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,004,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
905,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,797,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,037,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
8,799,578 |
|
|
$ |
42,806 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
$ |
8,097,096 |
|
|
$ |
43,502 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
434,134 |
|
|
|
4,536 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
435,983 |
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
245,352 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
|
249,123 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
66,648 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
249,494 |
|
|
|
4,447 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
9,793,557 |
|
|
$ |
53,914 |
|
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
$ |
9,098,344 |
|
|
$ |
54,632 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
775,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
754,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
158,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,070,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,067,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
11,797,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,037,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.67 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
974,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
988,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,178 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
73,067 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a
tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total
adjustments for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $515,000 and for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 was $570,000. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average
interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free
funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
50
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $88.2 million,
an increase of $15.1 million, or 21%, as compared to the $73.1 million recorded in the second
quarter of 2009. For the third quarter of 2009, the net interest margin was 3.25%, up 34 basis
points when compared to the 2.91% recorded in the second quarter of 2009.
The yield on total earning assets for the third quarter of 2009 was 5.24% and 5.08% in the second
quarter of 2009. The third quarter of 2009 yield on loans was 5.79%, a 40 basis point increase
when compared to the second quarter 2009 yield of 5.39%. The liquidity management assets yield in
the third quarter of 2009 was 2.94% compared to 3.71% in the second quarter of 2009.
The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.18% in the third quarter of 2009 as
compared to 2.41% in the second quarter of 2009. The cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased
in the third quarter of 2009 to 1.93% compared to 2.15% in the second quarter of 2009.
The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes
payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, decreased to
4.41% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 4.43% in the second quarter of 2009. The Company
utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the banks, manage
capital, manage interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.
The higher level of net interest income recorded in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the
second quarter of 2009 was attributable to the impact of the life insurance premium finance loan
purchase and the ability to raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at lower rates. Average
earning asset growth of $682.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter
of 2009 was comprised of $452.7 million of loan growth and $227.2 million of liquid management
asset growth. The $682.0 million of earning asset growth was funded by a $695.2 million increase in
the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities.
In the third quarter of 2009, the yield on loans increased 40 basis points and the rate on
interest-bearing deposits decreased 22 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2009. The
bulk of the increase in yield on loans is attributable to the purchase of the life insurance
premium finance receivables. Management believes opportunities remain for the increasing credit
spreads in commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios and for lower rates from the
re-pricing of maturing retail certificates of deposits, both of which should contribute to
continued net interest margin expansion.
51
The following table presents a summary of the Companys net interest income and related net
interest margins, calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis, for the first nine months of 2009
as compared to the first nine months of 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
Liquidity management assets (1) (2) (7) |
|
$ |
1,923,869 |
|
|
$ |
48,004 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
$ |
1,493,511 |
|
|
$ |
53,114 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Other earning assets (2) (3) (7) |
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
23,530 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
Loans, net of unearned income (2) (4) (7) |
|
|
8,244,336 |
|
|
|
343,997 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
7,171,467 |
|
|
|
336,750 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets (7) |
|
$ |
10,191,447 |
|
|
$ |
392,489 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
$ |
8,688,508 |
|
|
$ |
390,797 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(76,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
103,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
936,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
883,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,154,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,646,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
8,217,631 |
|
|
$ |
132,261 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
$ |
6,927,829 |
|
|
$ |
168,697 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
435,359 |
|
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
4.14 |
|
|
|
434,528 |
|
|
|
13,696 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
266,264 |
|
|
|
5,401 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
389,882 |
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
67,198 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,498 |
|
|
|
13,348 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
249,594 |
|
|
|
13,643 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
9,235,950 |
|
|
$ |
165,843 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
$ |
8,076,833 |
|
|
$ |
207,083 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
754,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
97,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
1,066,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
11,154,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,646,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (5) (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
Net free funds/contribution (6) |
|
$ |
955,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
611,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Net interest margin (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
226,646 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
183,714 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading account securities and securities reflects a
tax-equivalent adjustment based on a marginal federal corporate tax rate of 35%. The total
adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $1.7 million and $1.9
million, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(6) |
|
Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average
interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free
funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(7) |
|
See Supplemental Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance
measure/ratio. |
52
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $226.6
million, an increase of $42.9 million, or 23%, as compared to the $183.7 million recorded in the
first nine months of 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, the net interest margin was 2.98%,
up 15 basis points when compared to 2.83% in the first nine months of 2008.
The yield on total earning assets for the first nine months of 2009 was 5.15% as compared to the
6.01% in the first nine months of 2008. The first nine months of 2009 yield on loans was 5.58%, a
69 basis point decrease when compared to the first nine months of 2008 yield of 6.27%. The yield
on liquidity management assets in the first nine months of 2009 was 3.34% compared to 4.75% in the
first nine months of 2008.
The rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 2.40% in the first nine months of 2009
as compared to 3.42% in the first nine months of 2008. The cost of interest-bearing deposits
decreased in the first nine months of 2009 to 2.15% compared to 3.25% in the first nine months of
2008.
The rate paid on wholesale funding, consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago advances, notes
payable, subordinated notes, other borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, decreased to
4.38% in the first nine months of 2009 compared to 4.43% in the first nine months of 2008. The
Company utilizes certain borrowing sources to fund the additional capital requirements of the
banks, manage capital, manage interest rate risk position and for general corporate purposes.
The higher level of net interest income recorded in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the
first nine months of 2008 was primarily attributable to a $36.4
million decrease in interest expense on interest-bearing deposits as
the Company was able to raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at lower rates. Average
earning asset growth of $1.5 billion in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period
of 2008 was comprised of $1.1 billion of loan growth and $430.4 million of liquid management asset
growth. This growth was primarily funded by a $1.2 billion increase in the average balances of
interest-bearing liabilities and an increase in the average balance of net free funds of $343.8
million. Management believes opportunities remain for increasing credit spreads in commercial and
commercial real estate loan portfolios and for lower rates from the re-pricing of maturing retail
certificates of deposits, both of which should contribute to continued net interest margin
expansion.
Analysis of Changes in Tax-equivalent Net Interest Income
The following table presents an analysis of the changes in the Companys tax-equivalent net
interest income comparing the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 and the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. The reconciliations set forth the changes in the
tax-equivalent net interest income as a result of changes in volumes, changes in rates and
differing number of days in each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
First Nine Months |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
of 2009 |
|
of 2009 |
|
of 2009 |
|
|
Compared to |
|
Compared to |
|
Compared to |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
First Nine Months |
|
Third Quarter |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
of 2009 |
|
of 2008 |
|
of 2008 |
Tax-equivalent net interest income for comparative
period |
|
$ |
73,067 |
|
|
$ |
183,714 |
|
|
$ |
61,257 |
|
Change due to mix and growth of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (volume) |
|
|
4,849 |
|
|
|
37,065 |
|
|
|
16,013 |
|
Change due to interest rate fluctuations (rate) |
|
|
9,468 |
|
|
|
6,541 |
|
|
|
10,908 |
|
Change due to number of days in each period |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
(674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-equivalent net interest income for the period
ended September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
88,178 |
|
|
$ |
226,646 |
|
|
$ |
88,178 |
|
|
|
|
53
Non-interest Income
For the third quarter of 2009, non-interest income totaled $150.7 million, an increase of $128.6
million compared to the third quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to the
bargain purchase gain recognized on the life insurance premium finance loan acquisition, the
securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC, an increase in mortgage banking revenue and trading
income offset by lower levels of fees from covered call options. For the first nine months of
2009, non-interest income totaled $232.6 million, an increase of $152.3 million compared to the
first nine months of 2008.
The following table presents non-interest income by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Brokerage |
|
$ |
4,593 |
|
|
$ |
4,354 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Trust and asset management |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wealth management |
|
|
7,501 |
|
|
|
7,044 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
13,204 |
|
|
|
4,488 |
|
|
|
8,716 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
(Losses) gains on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
(1,332 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
113,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,062 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from covered call options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
(2,723 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Trading income |
|
|
6,236 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
10,249 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
3,701 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
150,680 |
|
|
$ |
22,130 |
|
|
|
128,550 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Brokerage |
|
$ |
12,693 |
|
|
$ |
14,339 |
|
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Trust and asset management |
|
|
7,617 |
|
|
|
8,341 |
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wealth management |
|
|
20,310 |
|
|
|
22,680 |
|
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking |
|
|
52,032 |
|
|
|
18,120 |
|
|
|
33,912 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
9,600 |
|
|
|
7,612 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Gain on sales of premium finance receivables |
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Losses on available-for-sale securities, net |
|
|
(910) |
|
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
113,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,062 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from covered call options |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
(19,588 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
1,941 |
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Trading income |
|
|
23,254 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
22,858 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
34,318 |
|
|
|
30,283 |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
$ |
232,559 |
|
|
$ |
80,305 |
|
|
|
152,254 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
Wealth management is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of Wayne Hummer Trust
Company and the asset management fees, brokerage commissions, trading commissions and insurance
product commissions at Wayne Hummer Investments and Wayne Hummer Asset Management Company. Wealth
management totaled $7.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 and $7.0 million in the third quarter
of 2008. Increased asset valuations due to the recent equity market improvements have helped
revenue growth from trust and asset management activities. With equity markets improving in the
third quarter of 2009, wealth management revenue increased $618,000, or 36% on an annualized basis,
over the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, wealth management revenue totaled $20.3
million, down $2.4 million, or 10% when compared to the same period in 2008.
Mortgage banking includes revenue from activities related to originating, selling and servicing
residential real estate loans for the secondary market. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
this revenue source totaled $13.2 million, an increase of $8.7 million when compared to the third
quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to $9.3 million from gains recognized on
loans sold to the secondary market offset by $601,000 from changes in the fair market value of
mortgage servicing rights, valuation fluctuations of mortgage banking derivatives, fair value
accounting for certain residential mortgage loans held for sale and increased recourse obligation
reserves for loans previously sold. Future growth of mortgage banking is impacted by the interest
rate environment and current residential housing conditions and will continue to be dependent upon
both. Mortgages originated and sold totaled over $960 million in the third quarter of 2009
compared to $1.5 billion in the second quarter of 2009 and $344 million in the third quarter of
2008. The positive impact of the PMP transaction, completed at the end of 2008, contributed to
mortgage banking revenue growth in all quarters of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, mortgage banking
revenue totaled $52.0 million, increasing $33.9 million when compared to the same period in 2008.
Mortgages originated and sold totaled over $3.7 billion in the first nine months of 2009 compared
to over $1.3 billion in the first nine months of 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $3.4 million for the third quarter of 2009, an increase
of $773,000, or 29%, when compared to the same quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, service
charges on deposit accounts totaled $9.6 million, an increase of $2.0 million, or 26%, when
compared to the same period of 2008. The majority of deposit service charges relates to customary
fees on overdrawn accounts and returned items and has increased in 2009 as a result of the growth
of the Companys deposit base. The level of service charges received is substantially below peer
group levels, as management believes in the philosophy of providing high quality service without
encumbering that service with numerous activity charges.
Wintrust recognized $3.6 million of gains on the sale and securitization of premium finance
receivables in the third quarter of 2009. See the Overview Specialty Finance section of this
report and Note 8 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details on
the securitization of premium finance receivables. FIFC sold $33.6 million of premium finance
receivables in the third quarter of 2008, recognizing $456,000 of net gains. As a result of
paydowns of loans in the revolving securitization facility, the Company anticipates transferring
over $300 million of property and casualty premium finance receivables to the securitization
facility during the fourth quarter of 2009 and additional gains related thereto may be recognized.
The Company recognized $412,000 of net losses on available-for-sale securities in the third quarter
of 2009 compared to net gains of $920,000 in the prior year quarter. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized net losses on available-for-sale securities of
$910,000 and $553,000, respectively. Net gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities include
other-than-temporary (OTTI) charges recognized in income. In the third quarter of 2009, the
Company recognized $472,000 of OTTI charges on a corporate note of a financial issuer. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $2.6 million of OTTI charges. For the
quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized $2.1 and $4.2 million,
respectively, of OTTI charges on certain corporate debt investment securities. See Note 5 of the
Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details of OTTI charges and the
adoption of a new accounting standard related the presentation and disclosure of OTTI charges.
55
The bargain purchase gain resulted from the acquisition of the life insurance premium finance
receivable portfolio. See the Overview Specialty Finance section of this report and Note 3 of
the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of the transaction.
The following table summarizes the components of this transaction:
Purchased Loan Portfolio
Summary of Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discounts - |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bargain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
non- |
|
|
|
loan |
|
|
purchase |
|
|
Total |
|
|
purchase |
|
|
Accretable |
|
|
accretable |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
balance |
|
|
price |
|
|
discounts |
|
|
gain (1) |
|
|
discounts |
|
|
discounts |
|
Loans purchased on July 28, 2009 |
|
$ |
949,322 |
|
|
$ |
685,306 |
|
|
$ |
(264,016 |
) |
|
$ |
(150,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(74,837 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,533 |
) |
- Initial bargain purchase gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Accretion (effective yield method) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
- Impact of
accounts clearing escrow (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Impact of accounts prepaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
- Non-accretable transfer to accretable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining balances at September 30, 2009(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(39,384 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,382 |
) |
|
$ |
(36,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans purchased on October 2, 2009 (4) |
|
$ |
83,393 |
|
|
$ |
60,460 |
|
|
$ |
(22,933 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,461 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,742 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
An additional $1.8 million of gain was recognized in conjunction with the establishment of a customer list intangible asset. . |
|
(2) |
|
Third party consents were received and funds were released from escrow. |
|
(3) |
|
The remaining unrecognized bargain purchase gain is recognizable subject to the receipt of required third party consents. . |
|
(4) |
|
None of the purchase price proceeds from the October 2, 2009 purchase are held in escrow. The bargain purchase gain is fully recognizable in the fourth quarter of 2009. |
Other non-interest income for the third quarter of 2009 totaled $10.2 million, an increase of $3.7
million, compared to $6.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. Trading income increased $6.0
million as the Company recognized $6.2 million in trading income resulting primarily from the
increase in fair value of certain collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company purchased these
securities at a significant discount to par value during the first quarter of 2009. These
securities have increased in value since their purchase due to market spreads tightening, increased
mortgage prepayments due to favorable mortgage rate environment and the resultant refinancing
activity taking place in the market, and lower than projected default rates. Partially offsetting
the increase in trading income were fees from certain covered call option transactions decreasing
by $2.7 million, as no income was recorded from this activity in the third quarter of 2009.
Historically, compression in the net interest margin was effectively offset, as has consistently
been the case, by the Companys covered call strategy. In the third quarter of 2009, as the
Companys net interest margin expanded, management chose to not engage in covered call option
activity due to lower than acceptable security yields which resulted in the elimination of revenue
from the Companys covered call strategy. On a year-to-date basis, other non-interest income
totaled $34.3 million, an increase of $4.0 million, or 13%, when compared to the same period of
2008. Trading income increased $22.9 million in the first nine months of 2009 when compared to the
same period in 2008 primarily from the increase in market value of certain collateralized mortgage
obligations discussed above. Offsetting this increase were lower fees from certain covered call
option transactions of $19.6 million in the first nine months of 2009 when compared to the same
period in 2008 as a result of lower than acceptable security yields in 2009.
56
Non-interest Expense
Non-interest expense for the third quarter of 2009 totaled $92.6 million and increased
approximately $29.4 million, or 46%, from the third quarter 2008 total of $63.2 million. On a
year-to-date basis, non-interest expense for 2009 totaled $253.8 million and increased $62.5
million, or 33% over the same period in 2008.
The following table presents non-interest expense by category for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
48,088 |
|
|
$ |
35,823 |
|
|
|
12,265 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
4,050 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
5,666 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
3,226 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions 3rd party brokers |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Postage |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Stationery and supplies |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
OREO expenses, net |
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
9,756 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
|
5,858 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
25,042 |
|
|
|
10,491 |
|
|
|
14,551 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
92,563 |
|
|
$ |
63,199 |
|
|
|
29,364 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
138,923 |
|
|
$ |
109,471 |
|
|
|
29,452 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
12,025 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Occupancy, net |
|
|
17,682 |
|
|
|
16,971 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
9,578 |
|
|
|
8,566 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Advertising and marketing |
|
|
4,003 |
|
|
|
3,709 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets |
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions 3rd party brokers |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Postage |
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Stationery and supplies |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
FDIC Insurance |
|
|
16,468 |
|
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
12,549 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
OREO expenses, net |
|
|
13,671 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
12,289 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Miscellaneous |
|
|
21,406 |
|
|
|
18,025 |
|
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
59,679 |
|
|
|
31,648 |
|
|
|
28,031 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
$ |
253,770 |
|
|
$ |
191,228 |
|
|
|
62,542 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits comprised 52% of total non-interest expense in the third quarter of
2009 and 57% in the third quarter of 2008. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $12.3
million, or 34%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 primarily as a
result of higher commission and incentive compensation expenses related to mortgage banking
activities and the incremental costs of the PMP staff. The higher commission and incentive
compensation expense is primarily attributable to an increase in variable pay (commissions) of $4.7
million as a result of the higher mortgage loan origination volumes. On a year-to-date basis,
salaries and employee benefits increased $29.5 million, or 27%, compared to the same period in
2008. Of this increase, $15.6 million was attributable to an increase in variable pay
(commissions) as a result of the higher
57
mortgage loan origination volumes, $11.6 million primarily related to acquisitions and the
remainder being generally related to increases in base salaries.
The combined equipment and occupancy expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $10.0 million, an
increase of $237,000, or 2%, compared to the same period of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, the
combined equipment and occupancy expense was $29.7 million in 2009, an increase of $708,000, or 2%,
compared to the same period of 2008.
Professional fees include legal, audit and tax fees, external loan review costs and normal
regulatory exam assessments. Professional fees for the third quarter of 2009 were $4.1 million, an
increase of $1.9 million, or 86%, compared to the same period in 2008. On a year-to-date basis,
professional fees were $9.8 million, an increase of $3.4 million, or 52%, compared to the same
period in 2008. These increases are primarily a result of increased legal costs related to
non-performing assets and acquisition related activities.
FDIC insurance totaled $4.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, an increase of $3.0 million
compared to $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, FDIC insurance
totaled $16.5 million in 2009, an increase of $12.5 million compared to $3.9 million in 2008. The
increase in FDIC insurance rates at the beginning of 2009 and growth in the assessable deposit base
contributed to the significant increases in FDIC insurance costs for the third quarter of 2009
while the first nine months of 2009 were also negatively impacted by the industry-wide special
assessment on financial institutions in the second quarter of 2009
OREO expenses include all costs related with obtaining, maintaining and selling of other real
estate owned properties. This expense totaled $10.2 million in the third quarter of 2009, an
increase of $9.8 million compared to $487,000 in the third quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date
basis, OREO expenses totaled $13.7 million in 2009, an increase of $12.3 million compared to $1.4
million in 2008. These increases are primarily due to the higher number of OREO properties and
losses on sales of OREO properties in 2009.
Miscellaneous expense includes expenses such as ATM expenses, correspondent bank charges,
directors fees, telephone, travel and entertainment, corporate insurance, dues and subscriptions
and lending origination costs that are not deferred. Miscellaneous expenses in the third quarter
of 2009 increased $1.9 million, or 32%, compared to the same period in the prior year. On
year-to-date basis, miscellaneous expenses increased $3.4 million, or 19%, compared to the same
period in the prior year. The quarter and year-to-date increases are attributable to the general
growth in the Companys business.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $22.6 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, compared to a tax benefit of $2.1 million for same period of 2008. For the nine months ended
September 30, income tax expense totaled $29.5 million for 2009 and $9.4 million for 2008. The
effective tax rate was 39.6% and 33.6% for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The higher effective tax rate in the 2009 year-to-date period is primarily a result of a higher
level of pretax net income in the period relative to tax-advantaged income than in the 2008
year-to-date period.
Operating Segment Results
As described in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Companys operations consist
of three primary segments: community banking, specialty finance and wealth management. The
Companys profitability is primarily dependent on the net interest income, provision for credit
losses, non-interest income and operating expenses of its community banking segment. The net
interest income of the community banking segment includes interest income and related interest
costs from portfolio loans that were purchased from the specialty finance segment. For purposes of
internal segment profitability analysis, management reviews the results of its specialty finance
segment as if all loans originated and sold to the community banking segment were retained within
that segments operations. Similarly, for purposes of analyzing the contribution from the wealth
management segment, management allocates the net interest income earned by the community banking
segment on deposit balances of customers of the wealth management segment to the wealth management
segment. (See wealth management deposits discussion in Deposits section of this report for more
information on these deposits.)
58
The community banking segments net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
totaled $84.5 million as compared to $59.0 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of
$25.5 million, or 43%. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $215.9 million for the
first nine months of 2009, an increase of $38.3 million, or 22%, as compared to the $177.6 million
recorded last year. These increases were primarily attributable to the acquisition of the life
insurance premium finance portfolio and lower costs of interest-bearing deposits. The community
banking segments non-interest income totaled $18.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, an
increase of $4.6 million, or 32%, when compared to the third quarter of 2008 total of $14.3
million. Non-interest income increased 27% to $70.6 million in the first nine months of 2009
compared to the third quarter of 2008. These increases were primarily attributable to an increase
in mortgage banking revenue offset by lower levels of fees from covered call options. The community
banking segments net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 totaled $35.4 million, a
decrease of $36.7 million, as compared to the third quarter of 2008 net income of $1.4 million.
The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, totaled $24.9 million, a decrease of
$55.8 million, or 181%, as compared to the prior year total net income of $30.9 million. The
decrease is primarily due to recording an additional provision for loan losses to accommodate for
the additional net charge-offs during the quarter and the expense related to write downs of other
real estate owned.
Net interest income for the specialty finance segment totaled $33.7 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $17.1 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of $16.7
million or 98%. On a year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $71.9 million for the first
nine months of 2009, an increase of $20.2 million, or 39%, as compared to the $51.7 million
recorded last year. These increases are attributable to the impact of the life insurance premium
finance loan purchase and the ability to raise and retain interest-bearing deposits at lower rates.
The specialty finance segments non-interest income totaled $114.3 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, compared to $1.3 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of $113.0
million. Non-interest income increased $111.3 million to $115.8 million in the first nine months
of 2009 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in non-interest income in
2009 is a result of the bargain purchase gain from the acquisition of the life insurance premium
finance receivable portfolio. See the Overview Specialty Finance section of this report and
Note 3 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of the
bargain purchase. Net after-tax profit of the specialty finance segment totaled $120.4 million and
$7.9 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 respectively. The specialty
finance segments after-tax profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, totaled $136.7
million, a increase of $112.2 million, or 458%, as compared to the prior year total of $24.5
million.
The wealth management segment reported net interest income of $7.8 million for the third quarter of
2009 compared to $4.5 million in the same quarter of 2008. Net interest income is comprised of the
net interest earned on brokerage customer receivables at WHI and an allocation of the net interest
income earned by the community banking segment on non-interest bearing and interest-bearing wealth
management customer account balances on deposit at the banks (wealth management deposits). The
allocated net interest income included in this segments profitability was $7.6 million ($4.7
million after tax) in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $4.2 million ($2.6 million after tax)
in the third quarter of 2008. The increase is mainly due to the recent equity market improvements
that have helped revenue growth from trust and asset management activities. This segment recorded
non-interest income of $10.4 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to $8.8 million for the
third quarter of 2008. The wealth management segments net income totaled $4.4 million for the
third quarter of 2009 compared to net income of $2.4 million for the third quarter of 2008. This
increase is a result of the improvement of equity markets in the third quarter of 2009, coupled
with the purchase of certain assets and liabilities of Advanced Investment Partners, LLC during the second quarter of 2009. On a
year-to-date basis, net interest income totaled $21.3 million for the first nine months of 2009, an
increase of $7.5 million or 54%, as compared to the $13.8 million recorded last year. The
allocated net interest income included in this segments profitability was $20.9 million ($12.8
million after tax) in the first nine months of 2009 and $13.0 million ($8.0 million after tax) in
the first nine months of 2008. Non-interest income decreased $568,000 to $27.9 million in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in the prior year. This segments after-tax
net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 totaled $11.2 million compared to the prior
year $8.1 million, an increase of $3.1 million.
59
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets were $12.1 billion at September 30, 2009, representing an increase of $2.3 billion, or
23%, when compared to September 30, 2008 and $776.5 million, or 27% on an annualized basis, when
compared to June 30, 2009. Total funding, which includes deposits, all notes and advances,
including the junior subordinated debentures, was $10.6 billion at September 30, 2009, $8.9 billion
at September 30, 2008 and $10.2 billion at June 30, 2009. See Notes 5, 6, 10, 11 and 12 of the
Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for additional period-end detail on the
Companys interest-earning assets and funding liabilities.
Interest-Earning Assets
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average earning asset balances and
the relative percentage of total average earning assets for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
5,070,811 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
$ |
4,987,587 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
4,612,881 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
918,576 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
919,667 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
799,595 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Residential real estate (1) |
|
|
499,708 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
493,546 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
341,106 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Premium finance receivables (2) |
|
|
1,938,645 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1,521,373 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,216,153 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
124,552 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
143,516 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
212,614 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
112,989 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
146,883 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
161,496 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income (3) |
|
$ |
8,665,281 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
8,212,572 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
7,343,845 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
Liquidity management assets (4) |
|
|
2,078,330 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,851,179 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,544,465 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other earning assets (5) |
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets |
|
$ |
10,768,485 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
10,086,445 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,909,997 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
11,797,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,037,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,881,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets
to total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residential real estate loans include mortgage loans held-for-sale. |
|
(2) |
|
Premium finance receivables include loans held-for-sale |
|
(3) |
|
Total loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(4) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities
purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(5) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities. |
Total average earning assets for the third quarter of 2009 increased $1.9 billion, or 21%, to $10.8
billion, compared to the third quarter of 2008, and increased $695.3 million, or 27% on an
annualized basis, compared to the second quarter of 2009. The ratio of total average earning assets
as a percent of total average assets was 91% at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, up slightly
from 90% in the third quarter of 2008.
Total average loans during the third quarter of 2009 increased $1.3 billion, or 18%, over the
previous year third quarter. Average premium finance receivables increased 59%, residential real
estate loans increased 47%, home equity loans increased 15%, and commercial and commercial real
estate loans increased 10% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the average balances in the
third quarter of 2008. The increase in average residential real estate loans is a result of higher
mortgage loan originations. As a result of economic conditions, the Company has been actively
managing its home equity portfolio to ensure that diligent pricing, appraisal and other
underwriting activities continue to exist. The Company has not sacrificed asset quality or pricing
standards to grow outstanding loan balances.
The increase in the average balance of premium finance receivables is a result of FIFCs purchase
of a portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance loans in July 2009. After giving effect to
post-closing adjustments, an aggregate unpaid principal loan balance of $949.3 million was
purchased for $685.3 million in cash.
60
Additionally, the majority of premium finance receivables, commercial and life insurance, are
purchased by the banks in order to more fully utilize their lending capacity as these loans
generally provide the banks with higher yields than alternative investments. Historically, FIFC
originations of commercial premium finance receivables that were not purchased by the banks were
sold to unrelated third parties with servicing retained. However, during the third quarter of
2009, FIFC initially sold $695 million in commercial premium finance receivables to our indirect
subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, which in turn sold $600 million in aggregate principal
amount of notes backed by such commercial premium finance receivables in a securitization
transaction sponsored by FIFC. The Company sold $69.5 million of commercial premium finance
receivables to an unrelated third party in the second quarter of 2008.
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits with
banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. The balances of these
assets can fluctuate based on managements ongoing effort to manage liquidity and for asset
liability management purposes.
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities at WHI.
Trading securities are also held at the Wintrust corporate level. In the normal course of
business, WHI activities involve the execution, settlement, and financing of various securities
transactions. WHIs customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin
basis. In margin transactions, WHI, under an agreement with the out-sourced securities firm,
extends credit to its customers, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements,
collateralized by cash and securities in customers accounts. In connection with these activities,
WHI executes and the out-sourced firm clears customer transactions relating to the sale of
securities not yet purchased, substantially all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject
to individual exchange regulations. Such transactions may expose WHI to off-balance-sheet risk,
particularly in volatile trading markets, in the event margin requirements are not sufficient to
fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event a customer fails to satisfy its
obligations, WHI under an agreement with the outsourced securities firm, may be required to
purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customers
obligations. WHI seeks to control the risks associated with its customers activities by requiring
customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal
guidelines. WHI monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires
customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balances for the |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate |
|
$ |
4,962,504 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
4,544,182 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
916,095 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
739,717 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Residential real estate (1) |
|
|
490,263 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
342,615 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Premium finance receivables (2) |
|
|
1,590,961 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,157,557 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
144,255 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
224,846 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
140,258 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
162,550 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income (3) |
|
|
8,244,336 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
7,171,467 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Liquidity management assets (4) |
|
|
1,923,869 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1,493,511 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other earning assets (5) |
|
|
23,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets |
|
$ |
10,191,447 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,688,508 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
$ |
11,154,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,646,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets to total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Residential real estate loans include mortgage loans held-for-sale. |
|
(2) |
|
Premium finance receivables include loans held-for-sale. |
|
(3) |
|
Total loans, net of unearned income, include loans held-for-sale and non-accrual loans. |
|
(4) |
|
Liquidity management assets include available-for-sale securities, interest earning deposits
with banks, federal funds sold and securities
purchased under resale agreements. |
|
(5) |
|
Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account
securities. |
61
Average earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased $1.5 billion, or 17%,
over the first nine months of 2008. The ratio of total average earning assets as a percent of
total average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased slightly to 91% from
90% in the prior year period. Total average loans increased by $1.1 billion, or 15%, in the first
nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. The growth of loans in 2009 is the result
of the Companys continued business development efforts on its core loan portfolios, higher
mortgage originations and the purchase of a portfolio of domestic life insurance premium finance
loans in July 2009. Average liquidity management assets for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 increased $430.4 million, or 29%, over the first nine months of 2008. The balances of these
assets fluctuate frequently based on deposit inflows, the level of other funding sources and loan
demand.
Deposits
Total deposits at September 30, 2009, were $9.8 billion and increased $2.0 billion, or 26%,
compared to total deposits at September 30, 2008. See Note 10 to the financial statements of Item
1 of this report for a summary of period end deposit balances.
Deposit Maturity Analysis
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Savings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of |
|
|
|
Bearing |
|
|
And |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing Time |
|
(Dollars in |
|
And |
|
|
Money |
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
Certificates |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Certificates |
|
thousands) |
|
NOW (1) |
|
|
Market (1) |
|
|
Mgt (1) (2) |
|
|
of Deposit |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
of Deposit |
|
1 3 months |
|
$ |
2,087,357 |
|
|
$ |
1,981,467 |
|
|
$ |
615,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,392,088 |
|
|
$ |
6,076,810 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
% |
4 6 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,294 |
|
|
|
851,034 |
|
|
|
972,328 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
7 9 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,427 |
|
|
|
720,427 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
10 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,530 |
|
|
|
605,530 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
13 18 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,548 |
|
|
|
668,256 |
|
|
|
866,804 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
19 24 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,965 |
|
|
|
284,965 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
24+ months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320,299 |
|
|
|
320,299 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,087,357 |
|
|
$ |
1,981,467 |
|
|
$ |
935,740 |
|
|
$ |
4,842,599 |
|
|
$ |
9,847,163 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Balances of non-contractual maturity deposits are shown as maturing in the earliest time frame. These deposits do not have contractual maturities and
re-price in varying degrees to changes in overall interest rates. |
|
(2) |
|
Wealth management deposit balances from unaffiliated companies are shown maturing in the period in which the current contractual obligation to hold
these funds matures. |
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average deposit balances and the
relative percentage of total average deposits for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
775,202 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
754,479 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
678,651 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
1,120,567 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,052,901 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,029,800 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Wealth management deposits |
|
|
935,968 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
930,855 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
599,945 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
1,422,085 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,336,147 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
947,033 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
487,437 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
433,859 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
325,383 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Time certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,833,522 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4,343,334 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
4,224,904 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
$ |
9,574,781 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
8,851,575 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
7,805,716 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits for the third quarter of 2009 were $9.6 billion, an increase of $1.8
billion, or 23%, from the third quarter of 2008. Each deposit category increased, but the largest
increases, in terms of average balances and percentage increases, were in the money market accounts
and wealth management deposits. The average money market accounts increased $475.0 million, or 50%,
from 2008. The increase was due to the continued success of the MaxSafe money market account
product which essentially spreads the banks customer account balances across the Companys
15 bank charters and provides them with 15 times the FDIC insurance of a single bank.
62
Wealth management deposits are funds from the brokerage customers of Wayne Hummer Investments , the
trust and asset management customers of Wayne Hummer Trust Company and brokerage customers from
unaffiliated companies which have been placed into deposit accounts of the banks (wealth
management deposits in the table above). Consistent with reasonable interest rate risk
parameters, the funds have generally been invested in loan production of the banks as well as other
investments suitable for banks. The average balance of the wealth management deposits increased
$336.0 million, or 56%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008
primarily a result of the introduction of the Wholesale wealth management money market product,
which essentially spreads third party customer account balances across the Companys 15 bank
charters and provides them with 15 times the FDIC insurance of a single bank.
Other Funding Sources
Although deposits are the Companys primary source of funding its interest-earning assets, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of deposits is somewhat limited by customer
preferences and market competition. As a result, in addition to deposits and the issuance of
equity securities and the retention of earnings, the Company uses several other sources to fund
its asset base. These sources include short-term borrowings, notes payable, Federal Home Loan
Bank advances, subordinated debt and junior subordinated debentures. The Company evaluates the
terms and unique characteristics of each source, as well as its asset-liability management
position, in determining the use of such funding sources.
Average total interest-bearing funding, from sources other than deposits and including junior
subordinated debentures, totaled $1.0 billion in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $1.2
billion in the third quarter of 2008.
The following table sets forth, by category, the composition of average other funding sources for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
41,835 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
434,134 |
|
|
|
435,983 |
|
|
|
438,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements and other |
|
|
244,351 |
|
|
|
248,123 |
|
|
|
349,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other borrowings |
|
|
244,351 |
|
|
|
248,123 |
|
|
|
357,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
66,648 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
249,493 |
|
|
|
249,494 |
|
|
|
249,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other funding sources |
|
$ |
993,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,001,248 |
|
|
$ |
1,162,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable balances represent the balances on a credit agreement with an unaffiliated bank.
This credit facility is available for corporate purposes such as to provide capital to fund growth
at existing bank subsidiaries, possible future acquisitions and for other general corporate
matters.
FHLB advances provide the banks with access to fixed rate funds which are useful in mitigating
interest rate risk and achieving an acceptable interest rate spread on fixed rate loans or
securities.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements represent sweep accounts for certain customers in
connection with master repurchase agreements at the banks and short-term borrowings from brokers.
This funding category fluctuates based on customer preferences and daily liquidity needs of the
banks, their customers and the banks operating subsidiaries.
63
The Company borrowed funds under three separate subordinated note agreements. The balances of the
notes as of September 30, 2009 were $20.0 million, $20.0 million and $25.0 million with maturity
dates in 2012, 2013 and 2015, respectively. Each subordinated note requires annual principal
payments of $5.0 million beginning in the sixth year of the note and has terms of ten years. These
notes qualify as Tier II regulatory capital.
Junior subordinated debentures were issued to nine trusts by the Company and equal the amount of
the preferred and common securities issued by the trusts. Junior subordinated debentures, subject
to certain limitations, qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Company for regulatory purposes. The
amount of junior subordinated debentures and certain other capital elements in excess of those
certain limitations could be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to restrictions. Interest expense
on these debentures is deductible for tax purposes, resulting in a cost-efficient form of
regulatory capital.
See Notes 11, 12 and 18 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for
details of period end balances and other information for these various funding sources. There were
no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Companys contractual
obligations during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008.
Shareholders Equity
Total shareholders equity was $1.1 billion at September 30, 2009, reflecting an increase of $296.5
million since September 30, 2008 and $39.5 million since the end of 2008. The increase from
December 31, 2008, was the result of net income of $44.9 million less common stock dividends of
$6.5 million and preferred stock dividends of $14.7 million offset by $2.2 million of accretion on
the preferred stock, $5.1 million credited to surplus for stock-based compensation costs, a $4.3
million increase in equity from the issuance of shares of the Companys common stock (and related
tax benefit) pursuant to various stock compensation plans, and $4.2 million in higher net
unrealized gains from available-for-sale securities and the fair value adjustment on cash flow
hedges, net of tax.
The following tables reflect various consolidated measures of capital as of the dates presented and
the capital guidelines established by the Federal Reserve Bank for a bank holding company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
9.0 |
| |
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
12.3 |
| |
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Total average equity-to-total average assets * |
|
9.1 |
| |
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
* based on quarterly average balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital |
|
Adequately |
|
Well |
|
|
Requirements |
|
Capitalized |
|
Capitalized |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
The Companys principal sources of funds at the holding company level are dividends from its
subsidiaries, borrowings under its loan agreement with an unaffiliated bank and proceeds from the
issuances of subordinated debt, junior subordinated debentures and additional equity. Refer to
Notes 11, 12 and 17 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further
information on these various funding sources. The issuances of subordinated debt, junior
subordinated debentures, preferred stock and additional common stock are the primary forms of
regulatory capital that are considered as the Company evaluates increasing its capital position.
Management is committed to maintaining the Companys capital levels above the Well Capitalized
levels established by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies.
64
The Companys Board of Directors approved the first semi-annual dividend on the Companys common
stock in January 2000 and has continued to approve semi-annual dividends since that time; however,
our ability to declare a dividend is limited by our financial condition, the terms of our 8.00%
non-cumulative perpetual convertible preferred stock, Series A, the terms of our fixed rate
cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series B (the Series B Preferred Stock) and by the terms of
our credit agreement. In January and July 2009, Wintrust declared semi-annual cash dividends of
$0.18 and $0.09 per common share, respectively. In January and July 2008, Wintrust declared
semi-annual cash dividends of $0.18 per common share.
See Note 17 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for details on the
Companys issuance of preferred stock in August 2008 through a private transaction and also in
December 2008 under the CPP.
Participation in the CPP creates restrictions upon the Companys ability to increase dividends on
its common stock or to repurchase its common stock until three years have elapsed, unless (i) all
of the preferred stock issued to the Treasury are redeemed, (ii) all of the preferred stock issued
to the Treasury have been transferred to third parties, or (iii) the Company receives the consent
of the Treasury. In addition, the Treasury has the right to appoint two additional directors to the
Wintrust board if the Company misses dividend payments for six dividend periods, whether or not
consecutive, on the Series B Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the terms of the certificate of
designations creating the CPP preferred stock, the Companys board will be automatically expanded
to include such directors, upon the occurrence of the foregoing conditions.
Taking into account the limitation on the payment of dividends in connection with the Series B
Preferred Stock, the final determination of timing, amount and payment of dividends is at the
discretion of the Companys Board of Directors and will depend on the Companys earnings, financial
condition, capital requirements and other relevant factors. Additionally, the payment of dividends
is also subject to statutory restrictions and restrictions arising under the terms of the Companys
Trust Preferred Securities offerings and under certain financial covenants in the Companys
revolving line of credit. Under the terms of the Companys revolving credit facility entered into
on October 30, 2009, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on any equity interests,
including its common stock and preferred stock, if such payments would cause the Company to be in
default under its credit facility.
65
ASSET QUALITY
Past Due Loans and Non-Performing Assets
Our ability to manage credit risk depends in large part on our ability to properly identify and
manage problem loans. To do so, we operate a credit risk rating system under which our credit
management personnel assign a credit risk rating to each loan at the time of origination and review
loans on a regular basis to determine each loans credit risk rating on a scale of 1 through 9 with
higher scores indicating higher risk. The credit risk rating structure used is shown below:
|
|
|
1 Rating
|
|
Minimal Risk (Loss Potential none or extremely low) (Superior asset
quality, excellent liquidity, minimal leverage) |
|
|
|
2 Rating
|
|
Modest Risk (Loss Potential demonstrably low) (Very good asset
quality and liquidity, strong leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
3 Rating
|
|
Average Risk (Loss Potential low but no longer refutable) (Mostly
satisfactory asset quality and liquidity, good leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
4 Rating
|
|
Above Average Risk (Loss Potential variable, but some potential for
deterioration) (Acceptable asset quality, little excess liquidity, modest leverage
capacity) |
|
|
|
5 Rating
|
|
Management Attention Risk (Loss Potential moderate if corrective
action not taken) (Generally acceptable asset quality, somewhat strained liquidity,
minimal leverage capacity) |
|
|
|
6 Rating
|
|
Special Mention (Loss Potential moderate if corrective action not
taken) (Assets in this category are currently protected, potentially weak, but not
to the point of substandard classification) |
|
|
|
7 Rating
|
|
Substandard (Loss Potential distinct possibility that the bank may
sustain some loss) (Must have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the
liquidation of the debt) |
|
|
|
8 Rating
|
|
Doubtful (Loss Potential extremely high) (These assets have all the
weaknesses in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the
weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current existing
facts, conditions, and values, highly improbable) |
|
|
|
9 Rating
|
|
Loss (fully charged-off) (Loans in this category are considered full
uncollectible.) |
Each loan officer is responsible for monitoring his or her loan portfolio, recommending a credit
risk rating for each loan in his or her portfolio and ensuring the credit risk ratings are
appropriate. These credit risk ratings are then ratified by the banks chief credit officer or the
directors loan committee. Credit risk ratings are determined by evaluating a number of factors
including, a borrowers financial strength, cash flow coverage, collateral protection and
guarantees. A third party loan review firm independently reviews a significant portion of the loan
portfolio at each of the Companys subsidiary banks to evaluate the appropriateness of the
management-assigned credit risk ratings. These ratings are subject to further review at each of
our bank subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory authority, including the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of
Wisconsin and our internal audit staff.
The Companys Problem Loan Reporting system automatically includes all loans with credit risk
ratings of 6, 7 or 8. This system is designed to provide an on-going detailed tracking mechanism
for each problem loan. Once management determines that a loan has deteriorated to a point where it
has a credit risk rating of 6 or worse, the Companys Managed Asset Division performs an overall
credit and collateral review. As part of this review, all underlying collateral is identified, the
valuation methodology analyzed and tracked. As a result of this initial review by the Companys
Managed Asset Division, the credit risk rating is reviewed and a portion of the outstanding loan
balance may be deemed uncollectible or an impairment reserve may be established. The Companys
impairment analysis utilizes an independent re-appraisal of the collateral (unless such a
third-party evaluation is not possible due to the unique nature of the collateral, such as a
closely-held business or thinly traded securities). In the case of commercial real estate
collateral, an independent third party appraisal is ordered by the Companys Real Estate Services
Group to determine if there has been any change in the underlying collateral value. These
independent appraisals are reviewed by the Real Estate Services Group and often by independent
third party valuation experts and may be adjusted depending upon market conditions. An appraisal
is ordered at least once a year for these loans, or
66
more often if market conditions dictate. In the event that the underlying value of the collateral
cannot be easily determined, a detailed valuation methodology is prepared by the Managed Asset
Division. A summary of this analysis is provided to the directors loan committee of the bank which
originated the credit for approval of a charge-off, if necessary.
Through the credit risk rating process, loans are reviewed to determine if they are performing in
accordance with the original contractual terms. If the borrower has failed to comply with the
original contractual terms, further action may be required by the Company, including a downgrade in
the credit risk rating, movement to non-accrual status, a charge-off or the establishment of a
specific impairment reserve. In the event a collateral shortfall is identified during the credit
review process, the Company will work with the borrower for a principal reduction and/or a pledge
of additional collateral and/or additional guarantees. In the event that these options are not
available, the loan may be subject to a downgrade of the credit risk rating. If we determine that
a loan amount or portion thereof, is uncollectible the loans credit risk rating is immediately
downgraded to an 8 and the uncollectible amount is charged-off. Any loan that has a partial
charge-off continues to be assigned a credit risk rating of an 8 for the duration of time that a
balance remains outstanding. The Managed Asset Division undertakes a thorough and ongoing analysis
to determine if additional impairment and/or charge-offs are appropriate and to begin a workout
plan for the credit to minimize actual losses.
If, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to
collect all amounts due to it according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, a specific
impairment reserve is established. In determining the appropriate charge-off for
collateral-dependent loans, the Company considers the results of appraisals for the associated
collateral. As a result of the loan-by-loan nature of the Companys review process, no significant
time lapses have occurred during the review process.
67
The following table sets forth Wintrusts non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
Non-performing Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity |
|
$ |
1,272 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
7,860 |
|
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
14,301 |
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
5,903 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total past due greater than 90 days and still accruing |
|
|
36,937 |
|
|
|
24,303 |
|
|
|
25,385 |
|
|
|
13,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity |
|
|
10,885 |
|
|
|
11,925 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
6,214 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
167,008 |
|
|
|
184,960 |
|
|
|
91,814 |
|
|
|
81,997 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
16,093 |
|
|
|
15,806 |
|
|
|
11,454 |
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual |
|
|
194,722 |
|
|
|
213,916 |
|
|
|
110,709 |
|
|
|
99,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity |
|
|
12,157 |
|
|
|
13,372 |
|
|
|
7,145 |
|
|
|
7,298 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
190,410 |
|
|
|
192,820 |
|
|
|
106,564 |
|
|
|
88,097 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
27,807 |
|
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
20,793 |
|
|
|
16,142 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
$ |
231,659 |
|
|
|
238,219 |
|
|
$ |
136,094 |
|
|
$ |
113,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of
its own respective categorys period-end balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and home equity |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of non-performing loans |
|
|
41.05 |
% |
|
|
35.73 |
% |
|
|
51.26 |
% |
|
|
58.67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the above table reflects, the Companys allowance for loan losses (which are discussed below
under Allowance for Loan Losses) as a percentage of non-performing loans has generally declined
in recent years. For example, at September 30, 2008, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage
of non-performing loans was 59%, which declined to 41% at September 30, 2009. Recent increases in
the clarity and stability of collateral valuations have increased our ability to immediately
recognize a charge-off rather than establishing specific impairment reserves. The stability of
collateral valuations has lead to lower specific impairment reserves and increased charge-offs
relative to the overall levels of non-performing loans. As non-performing loan balances have
increased over the past five quarters, more of the nonperforming loans in current quarters have had
a partial charge-off and have smaller amounts, if any, of specific reserves allocated. This effect
has caused the total non-performing loans balance to increase at rate faster than the total
allowance for loan losses.
68
The table below shows the relationship between total non-performing loans (NPLs), the specific
allowance for loan losses reserved on impaired loans (Specific reserves) and the allowance for
credit losses (ACL):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
Premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, |
|
|
real estate |
|
|
finance |
|
|
finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consumer |
|
|
and home |
|
|
receivable- |
|
|
receivable- |
|
|
Indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
and other |
|
|
equity |
|
|
commercial |
|
|
life |
|
|
consumer |
|
|
|
Total |
|
NPLs at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
106,564 |
|
|
$ |
7,145 |
|
|
$ |
20,793 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
|
$ |
136,094 |
|
Specific reserves at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
16,374 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL September 30, 2008 Balance |
|
$ |
55,945 |
|
|
$ |
4,899 |
|
|
$ |
4,121 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
1,732 |
|
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
Net charge-offs 4Q 2008 |
|
|
(7,472 |
) |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(9,923 |
) |
Provision for credit losses 4Q 2008 |
|
|
11,759 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL December 31, 2008 Balance |
|
$ |
60,232 |
|
|
$ |
4,765 |
|
|
$ |
4,358 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
1,690 |
|
|
|
$ |
71,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPLs at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
141,355 |
|
|
|
9,935 |
|
|
|
22,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
$ |
175,866 |
|
Specific reserves at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
22,573 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs 1Q 2009 |
|
$ |
(7,788 |
) |
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(9,992 |
) |
Provision for credit losses 1Q 2009 |
|
|
7,067 |
|
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
$ |
14,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL March 31, 2009 Balance |
|
$ |
59,511 |
|
|
$ |
9,444 |
|
|
$ |
4,590 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
1,896 |
|
|
|
$ |
75,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPLs at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
192,820 |
|
|
|
13,372 |
|
|
|
30,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
$ |
238,219 |
|
Specific reserves at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
30,678 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs 2Q 2009 |
|
$ |
(9,830 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(12,798 |
) |
Provision for credit losses 2Q 2009 |
|
|
21,056 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
$ |
23,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL June 30, 2009 Balance |
|
$ |
70,737 |
|
|
$ |
10,209 |
|
|
$ |
3,576 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
|
|
$ |
86,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPLs at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
190,410 |
|
|
|
12,157 |
|
|
|
27,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
$ |
231,659 |
|
Specific reserves at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
15,876 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs 3Q 2009 |
|
$ |
(74,676 |
) |
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(79,667 |
) |
Provision for credit losses 3Q 2009 |
|
|
87,171 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
$ |
91,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACL September 30, 2009 Balance |
|
$ |
83,232 |
|
|
$ |
10,274 |
|
|
$ |
3,121 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
|
$ |
98,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables purchased
life loans credit discounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Reserves |
|
$ |
83,232 |
|
|
$ |
10,274 |
|
|
$ |
3,121 |
|
|
$ |
36,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
|
$ |
134,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Allowance for Credit Losses as a
percentage of loans outstanding |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Credit Reserves as a percentage of
loans (net of discounts) outstanding |
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In certain periods, the change in the total allowance for credit losses balance may not have moved
proportionately with the change in the balance of total non-performing loans. Factors causing
this, and as reflected in the table above, are:
|
|
|
Recent increases in the clarity and stability of collateral valuations have
increased the Companys ability to immediately recognize a charge-off rather than
establishing specific impairment reserves. The stability of
collateral valuations has lead to lower specific impairment reserves and increased
charge-offs relative to the overall levels of non-performing loans. This impact is
reflected in the third quarter of 2009 results. |
|
|
|
|
Relevant factors that contribute to the determination of adequate general allowance
for loan losses reserves are reviewed and updated. These updates could
increase/decrease the required reserves depending upon the nature of each change.
(Increases to factors impacting the general reserves are reflected in the third and
first quarter of 2009 results; historical loss factors for residential land and
development loans were increased in the third quarter of 2009 and general risk factors
for residential real estate and home equity loans were increased in the first quarter
of 2009; and decreases to factors |
69
|
|
|
impacting the general reserves are reflected in the
third quarter of 2009 for life insurance premium finance receivables and in the second
quarter of 2009 for commercial premium finance receivables.) |
The following table shows the current aging status of the Companys entire loan portfolio. Only
2.8% of the entire portfolio is in a non-performing (non-accrual or greater than 90 days past due
and still accruing interest) with only 1.7% either one or two payments past due. In total, 95.5%
of the Companys total loan portfolio is current according to the original contractual terms of the
loan agreements.
The tables below show the aging of the Companys loan portfolio at September 30, 2009 and June 30,
2009:
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
90+ days and |
|
|
60-89 days |
|
|
30-59 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Accrual |
|
|
still accruing |
|
|
past due |
|
|
past due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
Loan Balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate
loans |
|
$ |
166,726 |
|
|
$ |
23,377 |
|
|
$ |
31,957 |
|
|
$ |
80,069 |
|
|
$ |
4,733,730 |
|
|
$ |
5,035,859 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
5,375 |
|
|
|
915,549 |
|
|
|
928,548 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
4,077 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
273,831 |
|
|
|
281,151 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
16,093 |
|
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
6,394 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
|
|
709,951 |
|
|
|
752,032 |
|
Premium finance receivables life
insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,045,653 |
|
|
|
1,045,653 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
110,983 |
|
|
|
115,528 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
115,319 |
|
|
|
116,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
194,722 |
|
|
$ |
36,937 |
|
|
$ |
40,961 |
|
|
$ |
97,621 |
|
|
$ |
7,905,016 |
|
|
$ |
8,275,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aging as a % of Loan Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate
loans |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables life
insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
90+ days and |
|
|
60-89 days |
|
|
30-59 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Accrual |
|
|
still accruing |
|
|
past due |
|
|
past due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
Loan Balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate
loans |
|
$ |
184,722 |
|
|
$ |
7,519 |
|
|
$ |
59,673 |
|
|
$ |
34,870 |
|
|
$ |
4,797,133 |
|
|
$ |
5,083,917 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
7,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
902,918 |
|
|
|
912,399 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
272,516 |
|
|
|
279,345 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
15,806 |
|
|
|
14,301 |
|
|
|
6,637 |
|
|
|
13,855 |
|
|
|
837,516 |
|
|
|
888,115 |
|
Premium finance receivables life
insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,399 |
|
|
|
182,399 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
128,560 |
|
|
|
133,808 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
113,880 |
|
|
|
115,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
$ |
213,916 |
|
|
$ |
24,303 |
|
|
$ |
67,819 |
|
|
$ |
54,516 |
|
|
$ |
7,234,922 |
|
|
$ |
7,595,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aging as a % of Loan Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate
loans |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Premium finance receivables life
insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The following table shows the value of non-performing loans, impaired loans, the specific
impairment reserves and the total allowance for credit losses at the end of each of the five
previous fiscal quarters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired |
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves on |
|
|
Non- |
|
Loans |
|
Allowance for |
|
Impaired |
|
|
Performing |
|
(included in |
|
Credit Losses |
|
Loans (incl. |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans (NPLs) |
|
NPLs) |
|
(ACL) |
|
in ACL) |
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
231,659 |
|
|
$ |
148,008 |
|
|
$ |
98,225 |
|
|
$ |
16,485 |
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
238,219 |
|
|
$ |
206,192 |
|
|
$ |
86,699 |
|
|
$ |
33,741 |
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
175,866 |
|
|
$ |
151,290 |
|
|
$ |
75,834 |
|
|
$ |
23,476 |
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
136,094 |
|
|
$ |
113,709 |
|
|
$ |
71,353 |
|
|
$ |
16,639 |
|
As of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
113,041 |
|
|
$ |
60,098 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
$ |
16,144 |
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of the probable and reasonably
estimable loan losses that our loan portfolio is expected to incur. The allowance for loan losses
is determined quarterly using a methodology that incorporates important risk characteristics of
each loan, as described below under How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses. This
process is subject to review at each of our bank subsidiaries by the applicable regulatory
authority, including the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, the State of Illinois and the State of Wisconsin.
Management has determined that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at September 30, 2009,
and that the loan portfolio is well diversified and well secured, without undue concentration in
any specific risk area. This process involves a high degree of management judgment, however the
allowance for credit losses is based on a comprehensive, well documented, and consistently applied
analysis of the Companys loan portfolio. This analysis takes into consideration all available
information existing as of the financial statement date, including environmental factors such as
economic, industry, geographical and political factors. The relative level of allowance for credit
losses is reviewed and compared to industry peers. This review encompasses levels of total
nonperforming loans, portfolio mix, portfolio concentrations, current geographic risks and overall
levels of net charge-offs. Historical trending of both the Companys results and the industry
peers is also reviewed to analyze comparative significance.
71
The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for credit losses during the periods
indicated.
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period |
|
$ |
85,113 |
|
|
$ |
57,633 |
|
|
$ |
69,767 |
|
|
$ |
50,389 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
91,193 |
|
|
|
24,129 |
|
|
|
129,329 |
|
|
|
42,985 |
|
Reclassification to allowance for
lending-related commitments |
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
74,613 |
|
|
|
13,543 |
|
|
|
92,348 |
|
|
|
22,930 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
2,478 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
80,072 |
|
|
|
15,816 |
|
|
|
103,602 |
|
|
|
28,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(79,667 |
) |
|
|
(15,435 |
) |
|
|
(102,457 |
) |
|
|
(27,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at period end |
|
$ |
95,096 |
|
|
$ |
66,327 |
|
|
$ |
95,096 |
|
|
$ |
66,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments at
period end |
|
$ |
3,129 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
3,129 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses at period end |
|
$ |
98,225 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
$ |
98,225 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit discounts on purchased loans |
|
|
36,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit reserves |
|
$ |
134,420 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
$ |
134,420 |
|
|
$ |
66,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs by category as a percentage
of its own respective categorys average: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and commercial real estate loans |
|
|
5.83 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
2.48 |
% |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
Home equity loans |
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
Premium finance receivables commercial |
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Premium finance receivables life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect consumer loans |
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of unearned income |
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
0.84 |
% |
|
|
1.66 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs as a percentage of the
provision for loan losses |
|
|
87.36 |
% |
|
|
63.97 |
% |
|
|
79.22 |
% |
|
|
62.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at period-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,275,257 |
|
|
$ |
7,322,545 |
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans at period-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
Total credit reserves as a percentage of loans at period-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.62 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
72
The allowance for credit losses is comprised of an allowance for loan losses, which is determined
with respect to loans that we have issued, and an allowance for lending-related commitments. Our
allowance for lending-related commitments is determined with respect to funds that we have
committed to lend but for which funds have not yet been disbursed and is computed using a
methodology similar to that used to determine the allowance for loan losses. Additions to the
allowance for loan losses each quarter are charged to earnings through the provision for credit
losses. Charge-offs represent the amount of loans that have been determined to be uncollectible
during a given period, and are deducted from the allowance for loan losses, and recoveries
represent the amount of collections received from loans that had previously been charged off, and
are credited to the allowance for loan losses.
How We Determine the Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for loan losses includes an element for estimated probable but undetected losses and
for imprecision in the credit risk models used to calculate the allowance. As part of the Problem
Loan Reporting system review, the Company analyzes the loan for purposes of calculating our
specific impairment reserves and a general reserve.
Specific Impairment Reserves:
Loans with a credit risk rating of a 6, 7 or 8 are reviewed on a monthly basis to determine if (a)
an amount is deemed uncollectible (a charge-off) or (b) there is an amount with respect to which it
is probable that the Company will be unable to collect amounts due in accordance with the original
contractual terms of the loan (a specific impairment reserve). Loans which are not assigned a
specific reserve are included in the determination of the general reserve.
General Reserves:
For loans with a credit risk rating of 5 or better and loans with a risk rating of 6, 7 or 8 with
no specific reserve, reserves are established based on the type of loan collateral, if any, and the
assigned credit risk rating. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective as it
requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on
impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience,
and consideration of current environmental factors and economic trends, all of which may be
susceptible to significant change.
We determine this component of the allowance for loan losses by classifying each loan into (i) one
of 87 categories based on the type of collateral that secures the loan (if any), and (ii) one of
nine categories based on the credit risk rating of the loan, as described above under Past Due
Loans and Non-Performing Assets. Each combination of collateral and credit risk rating is then
assigned a specific loss factor that incorporates the following factors:
|
|
|
historical underwriting loss factor; |
|
|
|
|
changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards
and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating
credit losses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and
developments that affect the collectibility of the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of the loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant
staff; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of non-accrual loans,
and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of the banks loan review system; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; |
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of
such concentrations; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory
requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the banks existing portfolio. |
73
Recent
Refinements to the Methodology:
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses was refined in the second
quarter of 2008, in order to:
|
|
|
expand and standardize the classification of collateral at each of the Companys 15
subsidiary banks; |
|
|
|
|
comply with emerging regulatory guidance to modify our credit risk rating processes; and |
|
|
|
|
facilitate the development of a model for determining the allowance for loan losses on a
loan-by-loan basis. |
The refined methodology was developed in consultation with the examination teams of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the State of Illinois and
the State of Wisconsin, and we believe it provides a greater level of detail to management within
the existing process. The refined methodology did not result in a materially different
determination of the allowance for loan losses, but has given our management a greater level of
detail by providing the appropriate allowance for loan losses on a loan-by-loan basis.
Home
Equity and Residential Real Estate Loans:
The determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses for residential real estate and home
equity loans differs slightly from the process used for commercial and commercial real estate
loans. The same credit risk rating system, Problem Loan Reporting system, collateral coding
methodology and loss factor assignment are used. The only significant difference is in how the
credit risk ratings are assigned to these loans.
The home equity loan portfolio is reviewed on a loan by loan basis by analyzing current FICO scores
of the borrowers, line availability, recent line usage and the aging status of the loan. Certain
of these factors, or combination of these factors, may cause a portion of the credit risk ratings
of home equity loans across all banks to be downgraded. Similar to commercial and commercial real
estate loans, once a home equity loans credit risk rating is downgraded to a 6 or worse, the
Companys Managed Asset Division reviews and advises the subsidiary banks as to collateral
valuations and as to the ultimate resolution of the credits that deteriorate to a non-accrual
status to minimize losses.
Residential real estate loans that are downgraded to a credit risk rating of 6 or worse also enter
the Problem Loan Reporting system and have the underlying collateral evaluated by the Managed
Assets Division.
Premium Finance Receivables and Indirect Consumer Loans:
The determination of the appropriate allowance for loan losses for premium finance receivables and
indirect consumer loans is based solely on the aging (collection status) of the portfolios. Due to
the large number of generally smaller sized and homogenous credits in these portfolios, these loans
are not individually assigned a credit risk rating. Loss factors are assigned to each delinquency
category in order to calculate an allowance for credit losses. The allowance for loan losses for
these categories is entirely a general reserve.
Effects
of Economic Recession and Real Estate Market:
The Companys primary markets, which are mostly in suburban Chicago, have not experienced the same
levels of credit deterioration in residential mortgage and home equity loans as certain other major
metropolitan markets, such as Miami, Phoenix or Southern California, however the Companys markets
have clearly been under stress. As of September 30, 2009, home equity loans and residential
mortgages comprised 11% and 4%, respectively, of the Companys total loan portfolio. At present,
approximately only 3% of all of the Companys residential mortgage loans and approximately only 1%
of all of the Companys home equity loans are more than one payment past due. Current delinquency
statistics of these two portfolios, demonstrating that although there is stress in the Chicago
metropolitan and southeastern Wisconsin markets, our portfolios of residential mortgages and home
equity loans are performing reasonably well as reflected in the aging of the Companys loan
portfolio table shown earlier in this section.
74
Other Real Estate Owned
The table below presents a summary of other real estate owned as of September 30, 2009 and shows
the changes in the balance from June 30, 2009 for each property type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Development |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Total |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
# |
|
|
R |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
7,873 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
28,908 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
4,657 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
41,438 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Transfers at fair value |
|
|
3,533 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7,649 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
17,136 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolved |
|
|
(3,272 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5,526 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1,610 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(10,408 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
8,013 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
23,834 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
8,792 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
40,639 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ balance |
|
|
|
# number of properties |
|
R number of relationships |
75
LIQUIDITY
Wintrust manages the liquidity position of its banking operations to ensure that sufficient funds
are available to meet customers needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. The liquidity to meet
these demands is provided by maturing assets, liquid assets that can be converted to cash and the
ability to attract funds from external sources. Liquid assets refer to money market assets such as
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with banks, as well as available-for-sale debt
securities which are not pledged to secure public funds.
While the Company obtains a portion of its total deposits through brokered certificates of deposit
(brokered CDs), the Company does so primarily as an asset-liability management tool to assist in
the management of interest rate risk, and the Company does not consider brokered CDs to be a vital
component of its current liquidity resources. For example, as of September 30, 2009, Wintrust had
over $1.3 billion of cash, overnight funds and interest-bearing deposits with other banks
(primarily the Federal Reserve) on its books, but only maintained $588.8 million of brokered CDs.
Historically, brokered CDs have represented a small component of the Companys total deposits
outstanding, as set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Total Deposits |
|
$ |
9,847,163 |
|
|
$ |
7,829,527 |
|
|
$ |
8,376,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,471,441 |
|
|
$ |
7,869,240 |
|
Brokered CDs |
|
$ |
588,802 |
|
|
$ |
468,491 |
|
|
$ |
657,335 |
|
|
$ |
481,293 |
|
|
$ |
567,053 |
|
Brokered CDs as a percentage of Total Deposits |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
In
December, 2008 the Company sold the Series B preferred stock and
warrant to the federal government in connection with the
Companys participation in Treasurys Capital Purchase
Program. As of December 31, 2008, these were the only funds received
by the Company from the federal government. Without the CPP funds,
however, Wintrust would have been well capitalized as of
December 31, 2008.
Recent Liquidity Actions
As discussed in Note 8 of the Financial Statements presented under Item 1 of this report, in
September 2009, the Companys indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, sold $600 million
in aggregate principal amount of its Notes, which were issued in a securitization transaction
sponsored by FIFC. FIFC Premium Funding I, LLCs obligations under the Notes are secured by
revolving loans made to buyers of property and casualty insurance policies to finance the related
premiums payable by the buyers to the insurance companies for the policies.
At the time of issuance, the Notes were eligible collateral under TALF and certain investors
therefore received non-recourse funding from the New York Fed in order to purchase the Notes. As a
result, FIFC believes it received greater proceeds at lower interest rates from the securitization
than it otherwise would have received in a non-TALF-eligible transaction.
The Company believes that it has sufficient funds and access to funds to meet its working capital
and other needs. Please refer to the Interest-Earning Assets, Deposits, Other Funding Sources and
Shareholders Equity discussions of this report for additional information regarding the Companys
liquidity position.
INFLATION
A banking organizations assets and liabilities are primarily monetary. Changes in the rate of
inflation do not have as great an impact on the financial condition of a bank as do changes in
interest rates. Moreover, interest rates do not necessarily change at the same percentage as
inflation. Accordingly, changes in inflation are not expected to have a material impact on the
Company. An analysis of the Companys asset and liability structure provides the best indication
of how the organization is positioned to respond to changing interest rates. See Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks section of this report for additional information.
76
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains, and the documents into which it may be incorporated by reference may
contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking
information can be identified through the use of words such as intend, plan, project,
expect, anticipate, believe, estimate, contemplate, possible, point, will, may,
should, would and could. Forward-looking statements and information are not historical
facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only managements expectations,
estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict,
which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed under
Item 1A of the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Companys subsequent SEC
filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions.
Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating
to the Companys future financial performance, the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected
amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory
developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and managements long-term
performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on financial condition
and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Companys business and growth
strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management
businesses, internal growth and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual
results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result
of numerous factors, including the following:
|
|
|
negative economic conditions that adversely affect the economy, housing prices, the
job market and other factors that may affect the Companys liquidity and the performance
of its loan portfolios, particularly in the markets in which it operates; |
|
|
|
|
the extent of defaults and losses on the Companys loan portfolio, which may require
further increases in its allowance for credit losses; |
|
|
|
|
estimates of fair value of certain of the Companys assets and liabilities, which
could change in value significantly from period to period; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, the capital markets and other
market indices that may affect, among other things, the Companys liquidity and the value
of its assets and liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in the Companys regulatory capital ratios, including as a result of
further declines in the value of its loan portfolios, or otherwise; |
|
|
|
|
effects resulting from the Companys participation in the Capital Purchase Program,
including restrictions on dividends and executive compensation practices, as well as any
future restrictions that may become applicable to the Company; |
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial
services companies and/or the products and services offered by financial services
companies; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the Companys FDIC insurance premiums, or the collection of special
assessments by the FDIC; |
|
|
|
|
competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing
of the Companys loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth
management services); |
|
|
|
|
delinquencies or fraud with respect to the Companys premium finance business; |
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to comply with covenants under its securitization facility and
credit facility; |
|
|
|
|
credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers that could negatively
affect the value of collateral securing the Companys premium finance loans; |
|
|
|
|
any negative perception of the Companys reputation or financial strength; |
|
|
|
|
the loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to
complete their financial transactions without the use of a bank; |
77
|
|
|
the ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in the
banking and financial services industries; |
|
|
|
|
failure to identify and complete favorable acquisitions in the future, or unexpected
difficulties or developments related to the integration of recent acquisitions, including
with respect any FDIC-assisted acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected difficulties or unanticipated developments related to the Companys
strategy of de novo bank formations and openings, which typically require over 13 months
of operations before becoming profitable due to the impact of organizational and overhead
expenses, the startup phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically involved in
redeploying deposits into attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning
assets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations (including SFAS 166 and
167) and the impact on the Corporations financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
significant litigation involving the Company; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries. |
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events
that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
78
ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of
fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. This effort entails providing a
reasonable balance between interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and maintenance of
yield. Asset-liability management policies are established and monitored by management in
conjunction with the boards of directors of the banks, subject to general oversight by the Risk
Management Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. The policies establish guidelines for
acceptable limits on the sensitivity of the market value of assets and liabilities to changes in
interest rates.
Interest rate risk arises when the maturity or repricing periods and interest rate indices of the
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and derivative financial instruments are
different. It is the risk that changes in the level of market interest rates will result in
disproportionate changes in the value of, and the net earnings generated from, the Companys
interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and derivative financial instruments. The
Company continuously monitors not only the organizations current net interest margin, but also the
historical trends of these margins. In addition, management attempts to identify potential adverse
changes in net interest income in future years as a result interest rate fluctuations by performing
simulation analysis of various interest rate environments. If a potential adverse change in net
interest margin and/or net income is identified, management would take appropriate actions with its
asset-liability structure to mitigate these potentially adverse situations. Please refer to Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further
discussion of the net interest margin.
Since the Companys primary source of interest bearing liabilities is from customer deposits, the
Companys ability to manage the types and terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by
customer preferences and local competition in the market areas in which the banks operate. The
rates, terms and interest rate indices of the Companys interest earning assets result primarily
from the Companys strategy of investing in loans and securities that permit the Company to limit
its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk, while at the same time achieving an
acceptable interest rate spread.
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk is reviewed on a regular basis by management and the
Risk Management Committees of the boards of directors of the banks and the Company. The objective
is to measure the effect on net income and to adjust balance sheet and derivative financial
instruments to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximize net interest income.
Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates using many different interest rate
scenarios. One interest rate scenario utilized is to measure the percentage change in net interest
income assuming a ramped increase and decrease of 100 and 200 basis points that occurs in equal
steps over a twelve-month time horizon. Utilizing this measurement concept, the interest rate risk
of the Company, expressed as a percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time
horizon due to changes in interest rates, at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September
30, 2008, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 |
|
+ 100 |
|
100 |
|
200 |
|
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
Basis |
|
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
Points |
|
|
|
Percentage change
in net interest
income due to a
ramped 100 and 200
basis point shift
in the yield curve: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
(4.1 |
) % |
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
|
|
(6.7 |
)% |
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
This simulation analysis is based upon actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance
sheet instruments and incorporates managements projections of the future volume and pricing of
each of the product lines offered by the Company as well as other pertinent assumptions. Actual
results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest
rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.
79
One method utilized by financial institutions to manage interest rate risk is to enter into
derivative financial instruments. A derivative financial instrument includes interest rate swaps,
interest rate caps and floors, futures, forwards, option contracts and other financial instruments
with similar characteristics. Additionally, the Company enters into commitments to fund certain
mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments
for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors. See Note 14 of the Financial
Statements presented under Item 1 of this report for further information on the Companys
derivative financial instruments.
Periodically, the Company will sell options to a bank or dealer for the right to purchase certain
securities held within the banks investment portfolios (covered call options). The Company uses
these option transactions (rather than entering into other derivative interest rate contracts, such
as interest rate floors) to increase the total return associated with the related securities.
Although the revenue received from these options is recorded as non-interest income rather than
interest income, the increased return attributable to the related securities from these options
contributes to the Companys overall profitability. The Companys exposure to interest rate risk
may be impacted by these transactions. To mitigate this risk, the Company may acquire fixed rate
term debt or use financial derivative instruments. There were no covered call options outstanding
as of September 30, 2009.
80
ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
In the third quarter of 2009 FIFC completed the purchase of a majority of the U.S. life insurance
premium finance assets of certain affiliates of American International Group. As a result, the
Company has expanded its internal controls over financial reporting to include these operations.
Integration of these operations, along with the related internal controls is expected to continue
in the fourth quarter of 2009.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer carried out an evaluation under their supervision, with the participation of
other members of management as they deemed appropriate, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as contemplated by Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective, in
all material respects, in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (and
its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the periodic reports the Company is
required to file and submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act.
Other than the changes above, there were no changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
81
PART II Other Information
Item 1A: Risk Factors
An investment in our securities is subject to risks inherent to our business. The material risks
and uncertainties that management believes affect Wintrust are described below. Before making an
investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below
together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report.
Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or that management currently
deems immaterial may also impair Wintrusts business operations. This report is qualified in its
entirety by these risk factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to
happen, the value of our securities could decline significantly, and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
Difficult economic conditions have adversely affected our company and the financial services
industry in general and further deterioration may adversely affect our financial condition and
results of operations.
The U.S. economy has been in recession since the third quarter of 2008, and the housing and real
estate markets have been experiencing extraordinary slowdowns since 2007. Additionally,
unemployment rates have continued to rise during these periods. These factors have had a
significant negative effect on us and other companies in the financial services industry. As a
lending institution, our business is directly affected by the ability of our borrowers to repay
their loans, as well as by the value of collateral, such as real estate, that secures many of our
loans. Market turmoil has led to an increase in delinquencies and has negatively impacted consumer
confidence and the level of business activity. Non-performing loans increased to $231.7 million as
of September 30, 2009 from $136.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and $113.0 million as of
September 30, 2008. Continued weakness or further deterioration in the economy, real estate
markets or unemployment rates, particularly in the markets in which we operate, will likely
diminish the ability of our borrowers to repay loans that we have given them, the value of any
collateral securing such loans and may cause increases in delinquencies, problem assets,
charge-offs and provision for credit losses, all of which could materially adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Since our business is concentrated in the greater Chicago and southeast Wisconsin metropolitan
areas, further declines in the economy of this region could adversely affect our business.
Except for our premium finance business and certain other niche businesses, our success depends
primarily on the general economic conditions of the specific local markets in which we operate.
Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide
banking and financial services to customers primarily in the greater Chicago and southeast
Wisconsin metropolitan areas. The local economic conditions in these areas significantly impact
the demand for our products and services as well as the ability of our customers to repay loans,
the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of our deposit funding sources.
Specifically, most of the loans in our portfolio are secured by real estate located in the Chicago
metropolitan area. Our local market area has experienced recent negative changes in overall market
conditions relating to real estate valuation. As troubled assets are liquidated into the market,
the additional supply is driving appraised valuations of real estate much lower. Further declines
in economic conditions, including inflation, recession, unemployment, changes in securities markets
or other factors with impact on these local markets could, in turn, have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. Continued deterioration in the real estate
markets where collateral for mortgage loans is located could adversely affect the borrowers
ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral securing the loan, and in turn the value
of our assets.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to absorb losses that may occur in our loan
portfolio, our financial condition and liquidity could suffer.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses that is intended to absorb credit losses that we expect to
incur in our loan portfolio. At each balance sheet date, our management determines the amount of
the allowance for loan losses based on our estimate of probable and reasonably estimable losses in
our loan portfolio, taking into account probable losses that have been identified relating to
specific borrowing relationships, as well as probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and
credit undertakings that are not specifically identified.
82
Because our allowance for loan losses represents an estimate of probable losses, there is no
certainty that it will be adequate over time to cover credit losses in the portfolio, particularly
in the case of continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions, or events that
adversely affect specific customers. For example, since December 31, 2008, we have had to increase
our allowance for loan losses from $69.8 million to $95.1 million as a result of the economic
recession and financial crisis. This represents 1.15% of the total value of our loans outstanding
as of September 30, 2009. This increase is primarily the result of deterioration in our commercial
and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which comprised 61% of our total loan portfolio as of
September 30, 2009. Estimating loan loss allowances for our newer banks is more difficult because
rapidly growing and de novo bank loan portfolios are, by their nature, unseasoned. Therefore, our
newer bank subsidiaries may be more susceptible to changes in estimates, and to losses exceeding
estimates, than banks with more seasoned loan portfolios.
Although we believe our loan loss allowance is adequate to absorb probable and reasonably estimable
losses in our loan portfolio, if our estimates are inaccurate and our actual loan losses exceed the
amount that is anticipated, our financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely
affected.
For more information regarding our allowance for loan losses, see Asset Quality under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
Unanticipated changes in prevailing interest rates could adversely affect our net interest income,
which is our largest source of income.
Wintrust is exposed to interest rate risk in its core banking activities of lending and deposit
taking, since changes in prevailing interest rates affect the value of our assets and liabilities.
Such changes may adversely affect our net interest income, which is the difference between interest
income and interest expense. Net interest income represents our largest source of net income, and
was $244.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $224.9 million and $181.8 million for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. In
particular, our net interest income is affected by the fact that assets and liabilities reprice at
different times and by different amounts as interest rates change.
Each of our businesses may be affected differently by a given change in interest rates. For
example, we expect the results of our mortgage banking business in selling loans into the secondary
market would be negatively impacted during periods of rising interest rates, whereas falling
interest rates could have a negative impact on the net interest spread earned as we would be unable
to lower the rates on many interest bearing deposit accounts of our customers to the same extent as
many of our higher yielding asset classes.
Additionally, changes in interest rates may adversely influence the growth rate of loans and
deposits, the quality of our loan portfolio, loan and deposit pricing, the volume of loan
originations in our mortgage banking business and the value that we can recognize on the sale of
mortgage loans in the secondary market.
We seek to mitigate our interest rate risk through several strategies, which may not be successful.
For example, with the relatively low interest rates that prevailed in recent years, we were able
to augment the total return of our investment securities portfolio by selling call options on
fixed-income securities that we own. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, we recorded fee income of
approximately $29.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, and $2.0 million and $21.6
million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively.
During 2009, we have had fewer opportunities to use this mitigation methodology due to lower than
acceptable security yields and related option pricing. We also mitigate our interest rate risk by
entering into interest rate swap and other interest rate derivative contracts from time to time to
mitigate our interest rate risk. These derivative contracts are entered into with counterparties.
To the extent that the market value of any derivative contracts moves to a negative market value,
we are subject to loss if the counterparty defaults. In the future, there can be no assurance that
such mitigation strategies will be available or successful.
83
Our liquidity position may be negatively impacted if economic conditions continue to suffer.
Liquidity is a measure of whether our cash flows and liquid assets are sufficient to satisfy
current and future financial obligations, such as demand for loans, deposit withdrawals and
operating costs. Our liquidity position is affected by a number of factors, including the amount
of cash and other liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity
instruments that we have issued, capital we inject into our bank subsidiaries, proceeds we raise
through the issuance of securities, our ability to draw upon our revolving credit facility and
dividends received from our banking subsidiaries. Our future liquidity position may be adversely
affected by multiple factors, including:
|
|
|
if our banking subsidiaries report net losses or their earnings are weak relative to our
cash flow needs; |
|
|
|
|
if we deem it advisable or are required by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System to make capital injections to our banking subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to access our revolving credit facility due to a failure to satisfy
financial and other covenants; or |
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to raise additional capital on terms that are satisfactory to us. |
Continued weakness or worsening of the economy, real estate markets or unemployment levels may
increase the likelihood that one or more of these events occurs. If our liquidity becomes limited,
it may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
If we fail to meet our regulatory capital ratios, we may be forced to raise capital or sell assets.
As a banking institution, we are subject to regulations that require us to maintain certain capital
ratios, such as the ratio of our Tier 1 capital to our risk-based assets. If our regulatory
capital ratios decline, as a result of decreases in the value of our loan portfolio or otherwise,
we will be required to improve such ratios by either raising additional capital or by disposing of
assets. If we choose to dispose of assets, we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so at
prices that we believe to be appropriate, and our future operating results could be negatively
affected. If we choose to raise additional capital, we may accomplish this by selling additional
shares of common stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock, which
could significantly dilute the ownership percentage of holders of our common stock and cause the
market price of our common stock to decline. Additionally, events or circumstances in the capital
markets generally may increase our capital costs and impair our ability to raise capital at any
given time.
Our agreements with the Treasury restrict our ability to pay dividends and repurchase common or
preferred stock, place limitations on our executive compensation practices, and may result in
dilution to our common stockholders.
On December 19, 2008, we issued and sold preferred stock and a warrant to the United States
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) as part of the Capital Purchase Program. The preferred
stock has an annual dividend payment of 5.0%, which increases to 9.0% per year if we do not redeem
the preferred stock at or prior to February 15, 2014. This higher dividend rate may be financially
unattractive to us compared to the cost of capital under market conditions at that time. The
warrant issued to Treasury entitles the holder to purchase 1,643,295 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $22.82 per share, and may be exercised, in whole or in part, over a ten-year
period. If the warrant is exercised, the percentage ownership of holders of our common stock would
be diluted.
Furthermore, we are subject to certain restrictions as a result of our participation in the Capital
Purchase Program. In particular, prior to December 19, 2011, unless we have redeemed all of the
preferred stock or the Treasury has transferred
all of the preferred stock to a third party, the consent of the Treasury will be required for us
to, among other things, increase our common stock dividend or repurchase our common stock or other
preferred stock (with certain exceptions, including the repurchase of common stock to offset share
dilution from equity-based employee compensation awards). The terms of the Capital Purchase
Program also place limitations on our executive compensation practices, which may have a negative
impact on our ability to retain or attract well qualified and experienced senior officers. The
inability to retain or attract well qualified senior officer could materially and
84
adversely affect
business, results of operations, financial condition, access to funding and, in turn, the trading
price of our common stock. We may also become subject to additional restrictions in the future, as
the Treasury has the power to unilaterally amend the terms of the purchase agreement to the extent
required to comply with changes in applicable federal law.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future regarding the financial services
industry may significantly increase our costs or limit our ability to conduct our business in a
profitable manner.
As a result of the ongoing financial crisis and challenging market conditions, we expect to face
increased regulation and regulatory and political scrutiny of the financial services industry,
including as a result of our participation in the Capital Purchase Program. While we are unable to
predict the scope or impact of any potential legislation or regulatory action, it is possible that
such regulations could significantly increase our regulatory compliance costs, impede the
efficiency of our internal business processes, negatively impact the recoverability of certain of
our recorded assets, require us to increase our regulatory capital, interfere with our executive
compensation plans, or limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner.
Our FDIC insurance premiums may increase, which could negatively impact our results of operations.
Recent insured institution failures, as well as deterioration in banking and economic conditions,
have significantly increased FDIC loss provisions, resulting in a decline of its deposit insurance
fund to historical lows. The FDIC expects a higher rate of insured institution failures in the
next few years compared to recent years; thus, the reserve ratio may continue to decline. In
addition, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended, increased the limit on FDIC
coverage to $250,000 through December 31, 2013.
These developments have caused our FDIC insurance premiums to increase, and may cause additional
increases. On September 30, 2009, the FDIC collected a special assessment from each insured
institution, and additional assessments are possible. The FDIC has also proposed that insured
institutions be required to prepay three years of insurance premiums in 2009. Any such premiums
would be paid in cash, and while they would be recorded as a prepaid expense, our regulatory
capital ratios and liquidity would be reduced, and our lending capacity would be diminished, which
could negatively affect our future results of operations.
The financial services industry is very competitive, and if we are not able to compete effectively,
we may lose market share and our business could suffer.
We face competition in attracting and retaining deposits, making loans, and providing other
financial services (including wealth management services) throughout our market area. Our
competitors include national, regional and other community banks, and a wide range of other
financial institutions such as credit unions, government-sponsored enterprises, mutual fund
companies, insurance companies, factoring companies and other non-bank financial companies. Many of
these competitors have substantially greater resources and market presence than Wintrust and, as a
result of their size, may be able to offer a broader range of products and services as well as
better pricing for those products and services than we can. The financial services industry could
become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and
continued consolidation. Also, technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for
non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic
transfer and automatic payment systems, and has made it possible for banks that do not have a
physical presence in our markets to compete for deposits. If we are unable to compete effectively,
we will lose market share and income from deposits, loans, and other products may be reduced. This
could adversely affect our profitability and have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
85
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including, among other things:
|
|
|
the ability to develop, maintain and build upon long-term customer relationships based
on top quality service and high ethical standards; |
|
|
|
|
the scope, relevance and pricing of products and services offered to meet customer needs
and demands; |
|
|
|
|
the rate at which we introduce new products and services relative to our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
customer satisfaction with our level of service; and |
|
|
|
|
industry and general economic trends. |
Failure to perform in any of these areas could significantly weaken our competitive position, which
could adversely affect our growth and profitability, which, in turn, could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our premium finance business may involve a higher risk of delinquency or collection than our other
lending operations, and could expose us to losses.
We provide financing for the payment of commercial insurance premiums and life insurance premiums
on a national basis through our wholly owned subsidiary, First Insurance Funding Corporation
(FIFC). Commercial insurance premium finance loans involve a different, and possibly higher,
risk of delinquency or collection than life insurance premium finance loans and the loan portfolios
of our bank subsidiaries because these loans are issued primarily through relationships with a
large number of unaffiliated insurance agents and because the borrowers are located nationwide. As
a result, risk management and general supervisory oversight may be difficult. As of September 30,
2009, we had $752.0 million of commercial insurance premium finance loans, which represented 9% of
our total loan portfolio as of such date.
FIFC may also be more susceptible to third party fraud with respect to commercial insurance premium
finance loans because these loans are originated and many times funded through relationships with
unaffiliated insurance agents and brokers. Acts of fraud are difficult to detect and deter, and we
cannot assure investors that FIFCs risk management procedures and controls will prevent losses
from fraudulent activity. We may be exposed to the risk of loss in its premium finance business
because of fraud, the possibility of insolvency of insurance carriers that are in possession of
unearned insurance premiums that represent our collateral or that our collateral value is not
ultimately enough to cover our outstanding balance in the event that a borrower defaults, which
could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, to the extent that affiliates of insurance carriers, banks, and other lending
institutions add greater service and flexibility to their financing practices in the future, our
competitive position and results of operations could be adversely affected. There can be no
assurance that FIFC will be able to continue to compete successfully in its markets.
If we fail to comply with certain of our covenants under our securitization facility, the holders
of the related notes could declare a rapid amortization event, which could require us to repay any
outstanding amounts immediately, which would significantly impair our financial condition and
liquidity.
In September 2009, our indirect subsidiary, FIFC Premium Funding I, LLC, sold $600 million in
aggregate principal amount of its Series 2009-A Premium Finance Asset Backed Notes, Class A (the
Notes), which were issued in a
securitization transaction sponsored by FIFC. The related indenture contains certain financial and
other covenants that must be met in order to continue to sell notes into the facility. In
addition, if any of these covenants are breached, the holders of the Notes may, under certain
circumstances, declare a rapid amortization event, which would require us to repay the any
outstanding notes immediately. Such an event would significantly impair our financial condition
and liquidity.
86
Widespread financial difficulties or credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance
providers could lessen the value of the collateral securing our premium finance loans and impair
the financial condition and liquidity of FIFC.
FIFCs premium finance loans are primarily secured by the insurance policies financed by the loans.
These insurance policies are written by a large number of insurance companies geographically
dispersed throughout the country. To the extent that commercial or life insurance providers
experience widespread difficulties or credit downgrades, the value of our collateral will be
reduced. If one or more large nationwide insurers were to fail, the value of our portfolio could
be significantly negatively impacted. A significant downgrade in the value of the collateral
supporting our premium finance business could impair our ability to create liquidity for this
business, which, in turn could negatively impact our ability to expand.
An actual or perceived reduction in our financial strength may cause others to reduce or cease
doing business with us, which could result in a decrease in our net interest income.
Our customers rely upon our financial strength and stability and evaluate the risks of doing
business with us. If we experience diminished financial strength or stability, actual or perceived,
including due to market or regulatory developments, announced or rumored business developments or
results of operations, or a decline in stock price, customers may withdraw their deposits or
otherwise seek services from other banking institutions and prospective customers may select other
service providers. The risk that we may be perceived as less creditworthy relative to other market
participants is increased in the current market environment, where the consolidation of financial
institutions, including major global financial institutions, is resulting in a smaller number of
much larger counterparties and competitors. If customers reduce their deposits with us or select
other service providers for all or a portion of the services that we provide them, net interest
income and fee revenues will decrease accordingly, and could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could
adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to complete financial transactions that
historically have involved banks through alternative methods. For example, consumers can now
maintain funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits in brokerage accounts or
mutual funds. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and transferring funds
directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries could
result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income
generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a
source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
If we are unable to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel, our ability to provide
high quality service will be diminished and our results of operations may suffer.
We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain
experienced personnel, including our senior management and other key personnel. Our business model
is dependent upon our ability to provide high quality, personal service at our community banks. In
addition, as a holding company that conducts its operations through our subsidiaries, we are
focused on providing entrepreneurial-based compensation to the chief executives of each our
business units. As a Company with start-up and growth oriented operations, we are cognizant that
to attract and retain the managerial talent necessary to operate and grow our businesses we often
have to compensate our executives with a view to the business we expect them to manage, rather than
the size of the business they currently manage. Accordingly, the
restrictions placed on executive compensation through our participation in the Capital Purchase
Program, as well any future restrictions, may negatively impact our ability to retain and attract
senior management. The loss of any of our senior managers or other key personnel, or our inability
to identify, recruit and retain such personnel, could materially and adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
87
If we are unable to continue to identify favorable acquisitions or successfully integrate our
acquisitions, our growth may be limited and our results of operations could suffer.
In the past several years, we have completed numerous acquisitions of banks, other financial
service related companies and financial service related assets and may continue to make such
acquisitions in the future. Wintrust seeks merger or acquisition partners that are culturally
similar and have experienced management and possess either significant market presence or have
potential for improved profitability through financial management, economies of scale or expanded
services. Failure to successfully identify and complete acquisitions likely will result in Wintrust
achieving slower growth. Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches involves various risks
commonly associated with acquisitions, including, among other things:
|
|
|
potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities or asset quality issues of the
target company; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of the target
company; |
|
|
|
|
potential disruption to our business, including diversion of our managements time and
attention; |
|
|
|
|
the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target company; |
|
|
|
|
difficulty in estimating the value of the target company; and |
|
|
|
|
potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may affect the target
company. |
Acquisitions typically involve the payment of a premium over book and market values, and,
therefore, some dilution of Wintrusts tangible book value and net income per common share may
occur in connection with any future transaction. Furthermore, failure to realize the expected
revenue increases, cost savings, increases in geographic or product presence, and/or other
projected benefits from an acquisition could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
We may participate in FDIC-assisted acquisitions, which could present additional risks to our
financial condition.
We may make opportunistic whole or partial acquisitions of troubled financial institutions in
transactions facilitated by the FDIC. In addition to the risks frequently associated with
acquisitions, an acquisition of a troubled financial institution may involve a greater risk that
the acquired assets underperform compared to our expectations. Additionally, while the FDIC may
agree to assume certain losses in transactions that it facilitates, there can be no assurances that
such an arrangement will be agreed to, or that it will be sufficient to protect us.
De novo operations and branch openings often involve significant expenses and delayed returns and
may negatively impact Wintrusts profitability.
Our financial results have been and will continue to be impacted by our strategy of de novo bank
formations and branch openings. While the recent financial crisis and interest rate environment
has caused us to open fewer de novo banks, we expect to undertake additional de novo bank
formations or branch openings when market conditions improve. Based on our experience, we believe
that it generally takes over 13 months for de novo banks to first achieve operational
profitability, depending on the number of banking facilities opened, the impact of organizational
and overhead expenses, the start-up
phase of generating deposits and the time lag typically involved in redeploying deposits into
attractively priced loans and other higher yielding earning assets. However, it may take longer
than expected or than the amount of time Wintrust has historically experienced for new banks and/or
banking facilities to reach profitability, and there can be no guarantee that these new banks or
branches will ever be profitable. To the extent we undertake additional de novo bank, branch and
business formations, our level of reported net income, return on average equity and return on
average assets will be impacted by start-up costs associated with such operations, and it is likely
to continue to experience the effects of higher expenses relative to operating income from the new
operations. These expenses may be higher than we expected or than our experience has shown, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
88
Changes in accounting standards could materially adversely affect how we report our financial
results and condition.
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC change the financial
accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These
changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial
condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised
standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
No purchases of the Companys common shares were made by or on behalf of the Company or any
affiliated purchaser as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, during the three months ended September 30, 2009. There is currently no authorization
to repurchase shares of outstanding common stock.
The Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Series B Preferred Stock was issued provides that no
share repurchases may be made until the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the date of
issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock and (b) the date on which the Series B Preferred Stock has
been redeemed in whole or the US Treasury has transferred all of the Series B Preferred Stock to
third parties. The Series B Preferred Stock was issued on December 19, 2008.
Item 6: Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 30, 2009 among Wintrust Financial Corporation, the lenders named therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009). |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
89
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009 |
/s/ DAVID L. STOEHR
|
|
|
David L. Stoehr |
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
90