FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
April 4,
2008
To Our
Stockholders:
We invite
you to attend our annual stockholders’ meeting on Thursday, May 8, 2008 at
our worldwide headquarters located at 2 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 2S01,
Melville, New York at 9:00 a.m.
At the
meeting, you will hear an update on our operations, have a chance to meet our
directors and executives, and you will be asked to elect two directors, to
approve an amendment to our incentive stock plan, to approve an amendment to our
equity compensation plan for our outside directors, and to ratify the
appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm. Your Board of
Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees and
proposals.
This
booklet includes a formal notice of the meeting and the proxy statement. The
proxy statement tells you more about the agenda and procedures for the meeting.
It also describes how our Board of Directors operates and gives personal
information about our director nominees.
Only
stockholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2008 will be
entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Even if you only own a few shares, we
want your shares to be represented at the annual meeting. I urge you to
complete, sign, date, and return your proxy card promptly in the enclosed
envelope.
Sincerely
yours,
|
|
/s/
ReiJane Huai
|
|
ReiJane
Huai
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
2
Huntington Quadrangle
Melville,
NY 11747
_________________
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To
Be Held May 8, 2008
________________
To Our
Stockholders:
The 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(“Annual Meeting”) of FalconStor Software, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware
corporation, will be held at the Company’s headquarters at 2 Huntington
Quadrangle, Suite 2S01, Melville, New York, commencing at 9:00 a.m. (EDT) on
Thursday, May 8, 2008, to consider and vote on the following matters described
in this notice and the accompanying Proxy Statement:
|
1)
|
To
elect two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors to three-year
terms and until the directors’ successors are elected and
qualified;
|
|
2)
|
To
approve an amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2006 Incentive
Stock Plan;
|
|
3)
|
To
approve an amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2007 Outside
Directors Equity Compensation Plan;
|
|
4)
|
To
ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal 2008;
and
|
|
5)
|
Any
other matters that properly come before the
meeting.
|
At the Annual Meeting, the Company
intends to nominate Steven Fischer and Alan Kaufman for election to the Board of
Directors. Mr. Fischer and Mr. Kaufman are currently members of the Company’s
Board of Directors. For more information concerning Mr. Fischer and Mr. Kaufman,
please see the Proxy Statement.
The Board of Directors has fixed the
close of business on March 21, 2008 as the record date for determination of
stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof,
and only record holders of common stock at the close of business on that day
will be entitled to vote. At the record date, 48,402,768 shares of common stock
were outstanding.
TO ASSURE REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL
MEETING, STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO RETURN A PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE BY
SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE. ANY STOCKHOLDER ATTENDING THE ANNUAL
MEETING MAY VOTE IN PERSON EVEN IF HE OR SHE PREVIOUSLY RETURNED A
PROXY.
If you plan to attend the Annual
Meeting in person, we would appreciate your response by indicating so when
returning the proxy.
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
/s/
Seth R. Horowitz
|
|
Seth
R. Horowitz
|
Secretary
|
Melville,
NY
April 4,
2008
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
2
Huntington Quadrangle
Melville,
New York 11747
_________________
2008
PROXY STATEMENT
GENERAL
INFORMATION
This
proxy statement contains information related to the annual meeting of
stockholders of FalconStor Software, Inc., to be held on Thursday, May 8, 2008,
beginning at 9:00 a.m. (EDT), at the Company’s headquarters at 2 Huntington
Quadrangle, Suite 2S01, Melville, New York, and at any postponements or
adjournments thereof.
ABOUT
THE MEETING
What
is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting
At the
Company’s annual meeting, stockholders will hear an update on the Company’s
operations, have a chance to meet some of its directors and executives and will
act on the following matters:
|
1)
|
To
elect two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors to three-year
terms and until the directors’ successors are elected and
qualified;
|
|
2)
|
To
approve an amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2006 Incentive
Stock Plan;
|
|
3)
|
To
approve an amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2007 Outside
Directors Equity Compensation Plan;
|
|
4)
|
To
ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal 2008;
and
|
|
5)
|
Any
other matters that properly come before the
meeting.
|
Who
May Vote; Date of Mailing
Stockholders
of FalconStor Software, Inc., as recorded in our stock register on March 21,
2008 (the “Record Date”), may vote at the meeting. As of this date, we had
48,402,768 shares of common stock eligible to vote. We have only one class of
voting shares. All shares in this class have equal voting rights of one vote per
share. It is anticipated that this Proxy Statement will be mailed to
stockholders on or about April 7, 2008.
How
to Vote
You may
vote in person at the meeting or by proxy. We recommend that you vote by proxy
even if you plan to attend the meeting. You can always change your vote at the
meeting.
How
Proxies Work
Our Board
of Directors is asking for your proxy. Giving us your proxy means you authorize
us to vote your shares at the meeting in the manner you direct. You may vote for
or against the proposals or abstain from voting.
Proxies
submitted will be voted by the individuals named on the proxy card in the manner
you indicate. If you give us your proxy but do not specify how you want your
shares voted, they will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors
recommendations, i.e.,
in favor of our director nominees, in favor of the amendment to the FalconStor
Software, Inc., 2006 Incentive Stock Plan, in favor of the amendment to the
FalconStor Software, Inc., 2007 Outside Directors Equity Compensation Plan, and
in favor of the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm.
You may
receive more than one proxy or voting card depending on how you hold your
shares. If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, you may
get materials from them asking how you want to vote. The latest proxy card we
receive from you will determine how we will vote your shares.
Revoking
a Proxy
There are
three ways to revoke your proxy. First, you may submit a new proxy with a later
date up until the existing proxy is voted. Second, you may vote in
person at the meeting. Last, you may notify our Chief Financial Officer in
writing at 2 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 2S01, Melville, New York
11747.
Quorum
In order
to carry on the business of the meeting, we must have a quorum. This means at
least a majority of the outstanding shares eligible to vote must be represented
at the meeting, either by proxy or in person. Shares that we own are not voted
and do not count for this purpose.
Votes
Needed
The
director nominees receiving a majority of the votes cast during the meeting will
be elected to fill the seats of our directors. For the other proposals to be
approved, we require the favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast. Only
votes for or against a proposal count. Votes that are withheld from voting on a
proposal will be excluded entirely and will have no effect in determining the
quorum or the majority of votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes count for
quorum purposes only and not for voting purposes. Broker non-votes occur when a
broker returns a proxy but does not have the authority to vote on a particular
proposal. Brokers that do not receive instructions are entitled to vote on the
election of the directors and the ratification of the auditors.
Attending
in Person
Only
stockholders, their proxy holders, and our invited guests may attend the
meeting. For security purposes, all persons attending the meeting must bring
identification with photo. If you wish to attend the meeting in person but you
hold your shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, you must bring
proof of your ownership to the meeting. For example, you could bring an account
statement showing that you owned FalconStor Software, Inc., shares as of March
21, 2008 as acceptable proof of ownership.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth information concerning ownership of the Common Stock
of FalconStor Software, Inc., outstanding at March 21, 2008, by (i) each person
known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of its
Common Stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director, (iii) each of the
Named Executive Officers identified in the summary compensation table, and (iv)
all directors, nominees for director and Named Executive Officers of the Company
as a group.
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner (1)
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
Percentageof Class
(2)
|
ReiJane
Huai (3)
|
9,631,760
|
|
|
19.9%
|
c/o
FalconStor Software, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
2
Huntington Quadrangle
|
|
|
|
|
Melville,
NY 11747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
L. Bock (4)
|
63,316
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick
B. Carney (5)
|
73,400
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
S. Dolin (6)
|
138,800
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
R. Fischer (7)
|
103,300
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan
W. Kaufman (8)
|
63,316
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
Lam (9)
|
585,372
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Weber (10)
|
339,479
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Wu (11)
|
540,804
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Directors, Nominees for Director and Executive Officers as a Group
(12)
(9 persons)
|
11,539,547
|
|
|
23.2%
|
*Less
than one percent
|
1.
|
A
person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of voting securities over
which the person has voting power or that can be acquired by such person
within 60 days after the record date upon the exercise of options,
warrants or convertible securities, or upon the lapse or the removal of
all restrictions on shares of restricted stock. Each beneficial owner's
percentage ownership is determined by assuming that options, warrants or
convertible securities that are held by such person (but not those held by
any other person) and that are currently exercisable (i.e., that are
exercisable within 60 days from the date hereof) have been exercised.
Unless otherwise noted, we believe that all persons named in the table
have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares
beneficially owned by them.
|
|
2.
|
Based
upon shares of Common Stock outstanding at the Record Date, March 21,
2008, of 48,402,768.
|
|
3.
|
Based
upon information contained in a report on Schedule 13D filed December 11,
2007 by Mr. Huai and certain other information. Consists of (i) 9,590,760
shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Huai and (ii) 41,000 shares of Common
Stock held by The 2002 ReiJane Huai Revocable Trust, of which Mr. Huai is
a trustee. Mr. Huai disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held
by The 2002 ReiJane Huai Revocable Trust, except to the extent of his
equity interest therein.
|
|
4.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Bock and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 5,000 shares of restricted stock
and (ii) 58,316 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are currently exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days
of March 21, 2008.
|
|
5.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Carney and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 100 shares of Common Stock held by
Mr. Carney, (ii) 5,000 shares of restricted stock and (iii) 68,300 shares
of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options that are currently
exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days of March 21,
2008.
|
|
6.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Dolin and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 40,000 shares of Common Stock held
by Northern Union Club, (ii) 5,000 shares of restricted stock and (iii)
93,800 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options that are
currently exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days of March
21, 2008. Mr. Dolin is a general partner of Mordo Partners, which is a
general partner of Northern Union Club. Mr. Dolin disclaims beneficial
ownership of the securities held by Northern Union Club, except to the
extent of his equity interest
therein.
|
|
7.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Fischer and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 5,000 shares of restricted stock
and (ii) 98,300 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options
that are currently exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days
of March 21, 2008. Excludes 1,000 shares of Common Stock held by Mr.
Fischer as a custodian for his daughter. Mr. Fischer disclaims
beneficial ownership of the securities held as a custodian for his
daughter, except to the extent of his equity interest
therein.
|
|
8.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Kaufman and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 5,000 shares of restricted stock and (ii)
58,316 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options that are
currently exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days of March
21, 2008.
|
|
9.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Lam and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 3,537 shares of Common Stock held
by Mr. Lam, (ii) 20,435 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Lam’s spouse,
(iii) 86,400 shares of restricted stock and (iv) 475,000 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon exercise of options that are currently exercisable or
that will be exercisable within 60 days of March 21,
2008.
|
|
10.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Weber and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 6,600 shares of Common Stock held
by Mr. Weber, (ii) 86,400 shares of restricted stock and (iii) 246,479
shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options that are
currently exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days of March
21, 2008.
|
|
11.
|
Based
on information contained in Forms 4 filed by Mr. Wu and certain other
information. Consists of (i) 130,620 shares of Common Stock
held by Mr. Wu, (ii) 86,400 shares of restricted stock and (iii) 323,784
shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options that are
currently exercisable or that will be exercisable within 60 days of March
21, 2008.
|
|
12.
|
Consists
of (i) 9,833,052 shares of Common Stock held by all directors, nominees
for director and executive officers as a group, (ii) 284,200 shares of
restricted stock, and (ii) 1,422,295 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of options that are currently exercisable or that will be
exercisable within 60 days of March 21,
2008.
|
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Messrs. Bock, Carney, Dolin, Fischer
and Kaufman did not file their Forms 4 on a timely basis following grants of
stock options and shares of restricted stock made to them automatically under
the Company’s 2004 Outside Directors Compensation Plan on the date of the
Company’s last annual meeting of stockholders. The Forms 4 were eventually
filed. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, and amendments thereto
furnished to the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, the
Company is not aware of any director, officer, or beneficial owner of more than
10 percent of any class of Company equities who failed to file on a timely basis
any other reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
Independence
In
accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the Nasdaq
Stock Market corporate governance listing standards (the “Nasdaq Standards”), a
majority of the Company’s directors must be independent as determined by the
Board. In making its independence determinations for directors, the Board looks
to the Nasdaq Standards.
Under the
Nasdaq Standards, a director is independent if: the director is not employed,
nor is the director a family member of anyone employed, by the Company or any
parent or subsidiary; the director is not, and does not have a family member who
is, a partner of the Company’s outside auditor or a former partner or employee
of the outside auditor who worked on the Company’s audit during the past three
years; the director has not, and does not have a family member who has, accepted
more than $100,000 during the current or past three fiscal years from the
Company or any of its affiliates; the director is not, nor is any family member
of the director, a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive
officer of, any organization to which the Company made, or from which the
Company received, payments for property or services that exceed five percent of
the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues or $200,000, whichever is more; and
the director is not, and does not have any family member who is, an executive
officer of another company where any of the Company’s executive officers serve
on the other company’s compensation committee.
The Board
of Directors currently consists of six directors, five of whom, Messrs. Bock,
Carney, Dolin, Fischer, and Kaufman are independent. Mr. Huai is a
non-independent management director who does not sit on any of our Board
committees.
PROPOSAL
NO. 1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
The
Company’s bylaws authorize the Board of Directors to fix the number of directors
and provide that the directors shall be divided into three classes, with the
classes of directors serving for staggered, three-year terms. Currently, the
number of members of the Board of Directors is six.
The
Company’s nominating procedures, including procedures for director candidates
proposed to be nominated by stockholders, and director qualifications, are set
forth below.
Steven
Fischer and Alan Kaufman were nominated by the Company’s Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee as the Board of Directors’ nominees for director.
Mr. Fischer and Mr. Kaufman are currently directors of the Company. Each would
be elected for a full three-year term. It is proposed that Mr. Fischer and Mr.
Kaufman be elected to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held
in 2011 and until their successors are elected and shall have
qualified.
Unless
authority is specifically withheld, proxies will be voted for the election of
each of the nominees below to serve as a director of the Company for a term
which will expire at the Company’s 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until
a successor is elected and qualified. If any one or more of such nominees should
for any reason become unavailable for election, the persons named in the
accompanying form of proxy may vote for the election of such substitute nominees
as the Board of Directors may propose. The accompanying form of proxy contains a
discretionary grant of authority with respect to this matter.
Name
|
Position
|
Age
|
Director
Since
|
Steven
R.
Fischer
Alan
W.
Kaufman
|
Director
Nominee
Director
Nominee
|
62
69
|
2001
2005
|
Steven R. Fischer has been
President of Capital One Leverage Finance Corp. and its predecessor entity since
July 2004. From February 2004 until July 2004, he was a consultant to financial
institutions. From 1992 to February 2004, he held multiple executive management
and financial positions, including most recently President, with Transamerica
Business Capital Corporation, a member of the Transamerica Finance Corporation
family of companies, specializing in secured lending for mergers, acquisitions
and restructurings. From 1981 to 1992, he served as Vice President and Regional
Manager of Citibank, N.A. Since 1995, he has served as a director of ScanSource,
Inc., a value-added distributor of POS and bar code products. Beginning in 2001
he served on the board of advisors of Keltic Financial LLC., a privately held
finance company that funds middle market companies. He holds a B.S. in Economics
and Accounting from Queens College and an M.B.A. from Baruch College. Mr.
Fischer has been a director of the Company since August 2001.
Alan W. Kaufman has been a
director of Appfluent Technologies since October 2002. He was a director of
NetIQ Corporation from August 1997 until its merger with Attachment Corporation
in August 2006. Mr. Kaufman served as a director of QueryObject Systems Corp.
from October 1997 to March 2002. He also served as QueryObject Systems’ Chairman
of the Board from May 1998 to October 1999, and as President and Chief Executive
Officer from October 1997 to December 1998, when he retired. From December 1996
to October 1997, Mr. Kaufman was an independent consultant. From April 1986 to
December 1996, Mr. Kaufman held various positions at Cheyenne Software, most
recently as Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales. Mr. Kaufman was the
founding president of, and currently serves on the Board of Directors of, the
New York Software Industry Association. He is on the Advisory Board of the CUNY
(City University of New York) Institute for Software Design and Development. Mr.
Kaufman holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Tufts University. Mr.
Kaufman has been a director of the Company since May 2005.
The names of the directors, whose terms
expire at the 2009 and 2010 Annual Meetings of Stockholders of the Company, who
are currently serving their terms, are set forth below:
Name
|
Position
|
Age
|
Director
Since
|
Steven
L.
Bock
Patrick
B.
Carney
Lawrence
S.
Dolin
ReiJane
Huai
|
Director
Director
Director
Director
|
54
43
64
49
|
2005
2003
2001
2001
|
Steven L. Bock has been CEO
and President of Rotobrush International LLC, a leading provider of air duct
cleaning systems to a range of service contractors, since October 2005. He is
also a member of Rotobrush’s Supervisory Committee. Mr. Bock was Chairman of the
Board and CEO of Unger Software Corporation from December 2002 until January
2007. He was also the President of Unger Software from October 2002 to October
2005. Prior to joining Unger Software, Mr. Bock was a consultant to early-stage
companies. He served as a Director and Interim Chief Operating Officer of
B2BVideo Network from November 2001 to May 2002. From December 1990 through July
2000, Mr. Bock was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Specialty
Catalog Corp., a direct marketer targeting niche consumer product categories
through a variety of catalogs and E-commerce web sites. Prior to joining
Specialty Catalog, Mr. Bock was an officer at investment holding and management
firms and was a partner of a law firm. Mr. Bock holds a B.S. from the State
University of New York at Albany, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. Mr. Bock
has been a Director of the Company since January 2005 and his term as a director
of the Company expires in 2009.
Patrick B. Carney has been a
Vice President of Melillo Consulting, Inc., a solutions oriented systems
integrator, since October 2006, and a General Manager since April 1, 2005. From
November 2004, through March 2005, Mr. Carney was an independent consultant to
senior management and senior IT executives. From October 2003, through October
2004, Mr. Carney was the Chief Technology Officer for Barr Laboratories Inc., a
specialty pharmaceutical company. From August 2000 through July 2003 he served
as the Chief Information Officer for the North Shore – Long Island Jewish Health
System where he was responsible for strategic IS planning and managing the IS
and Telecommunications operations throughout the Health System. From 1995 to
July 2000, Mr. Carney was the Vice President & Chief Information Officer for
Staten Island University Hospital. Mr. Carney’s career also includes IT
management experience in other industries as he was also the Director of
Information Systems for ABB Power Generation Inc., a subsidiary of the
Zurich-based Asea Brown Boveri, and also held positions at KPMG Peat Marwick,
Wang Laboratories, and IBM Corporation. Mr. Carney received a BS degree from
Manhattan College. Mr. Carney has been a director of the Company since May 2003,
and his term as a director of the Company expires in 2009.
Lawrence S. Dolin has been
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Noteworthy Medical Systems,
Inc. (“Noteworthy”), a provider of computerized patient record software, since
January 2000. Since January 1996, Mr. Dolin has been a general partner of Mordo
Partners, an investment management partnership. Since 1981, Mr. Dolin has served
as a director of Morgan’s Foods, Inc., which owns, through wholly-owned
subsidiaries, KFC restaurants, Taco Bell restaurants and Pizza Hut restaurants.
Mr. Dolin holds a B.A. from Case Western Reserve University and a J.D. from Case
Western Reserve University. Mr. Dolin has been a director of the Company since
August 2001, and his term as a Director of the Company expires in
2010.
ReiJane Huai has served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and its predecessor since
December 2000 and has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since
August 2001. Mr. Huai also served as a director of the Company’s predecessor
from July 2000 to August 2001. Mr. Huai came to the Company with a career in
software development and management. As executive vice president and general
manager, Asia, for Computer Associates International, Inc., he was responsible
for sales, marketing and the development of strategic joint ventures in the
region. Mr. Huai joined Computer Associates in 1996 with its acquisition of
Cheyenne Software, Inc., where he was president and chief executive officer. Mr.
Huai joined Cheyenne Software, Inc., in 1985 as manager of research and
development of ARCserve, the industry’s first storage management solution for
the client/server environment. Mr. Huai received a master’s degree in computer
science from the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1985. Mr. Huai
has been a director of the Company since August, 2001, and his term as a
Director of the Company expires in 2010.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE
NOMINEES.
Meetings
The Board
of Directors met on ten occasions during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007. In addition to the meetings, the members of the Board of
Directors sometimes take action by unanimous written consent in lieu of a
meeting, which is permitted. All Directors attended at least 75% of the meetings
of the Board of Directors.
Committees
The Board
of Directors currently has three committees: the Audit Committee; the
Compensation Committee; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Each of these committees has a charter. These charters are available on the
Company’s website at
http://www.falconstor.com/en/company/?pg=Governance&sb=Committees.
Audit
Committee
The Audit
Committee consists of Messrs. Bock, Dolin, and Fischer (Chair). The Audit
Committee is appointed by the Board to assist the Board in monitoring (1) the
integrity of the financial statements of the Company, (2) the qualifications and
independence of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged to
audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements, (3) the performance of
the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors, (4) the
integrity of management and information systems and internal controls, and (5)
the compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory
requirements.
Each
member of the Audit Committee is required to be “independent” as defined in the
Nasdaq Standards and in Section 301of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”)
and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Board has
determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” under these
standards. In addition, the Board has determined that, as required by the Nasdaq
Standards, each member of the Audit Committee was able to read and to understand
financial statements at the time of his appointment to the Audit
Committee.
The Board
has further determined that Mr. Fischer meets the definition of “audit committee
financial expert,” and therefore meets comparable Nasdaq Standard requirements,
because he has an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”); has the ability to assess GAAP in connection
with the accounting for estimates, accruals, and reserves; has experience in
analyzing and evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level
of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth
and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the
Company’s financial statements; has an understanding of internal controls and
procedures for financial reporting; and has an understanding of audit committee
functions. Mr. Fischer acquired these attributes through education and
experience consistent with the requirements of the Act.
The Audit
Committee met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. All
members of the Audit Committee attended at least 75% of the meetings of the
committee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
The
Company’s Board of Directors has adopted, and annually reviews, an Audit
Committee Charter and Guidelines for Pre-Approval of Independent Auditor
Services. The Audit Committee Charter is attached to this Proxy
Statement as Exhibit C.
Compensation
Committee
The
Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Carney, Dolin (Chair) and Kaufman.
The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board (i) to discharge the
responsibilities of the Board relating to compensation of the Company's
executives, (ii) to produce the annual report that is required by the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in the Company's annual
proxy statement, and (iii) to administer, and to approve awards under, the
Company’s equity-based compensation plans for employees. Under the Compensation
Committee Charter, all members of the Compensation Committee are required to be
“independent” as defined in the Nasdaq Standards. The Board has determined that
all of the current members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” under
these standards.
The
Compensation Committee met eight times during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007. All members of the Compensation Committee attended at least 75% of the
meetings of the committee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The
Compensation Committee also took action by unanimous written consent in lieu of
a meeting 11 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Bock, Carney
(Chair), Fischer and Kaufman. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
is appointed by the Board: (i) to identify individuals qualified to become Board
members, (ii) to recommend to the Board director candidates for each annual
meeting of stockholders or as necessary to fill vacancies and newly created
directorships and (iii) to perform a leadership role in shaping the Company's
corporate governance policies, including developing and recommending to the
Board a set of corporate governance principles. Under the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee Charter, all members of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee are required to be “independent” as defined in
the Nasdaq Standards. The Board has determined that all of the current members
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are “independent” under
these standards.
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met two times during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007. All members of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee attended at least 75% of the meetings of the committee
during the times they were members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee.
Nominating
Procedures and Director Qualifications
The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted the following policies
regarding nominations and director qualifications:
I. Consideration
of Nominees Recommended by Stockholders
The
Committee recognizes that qualified candidates for nomination for Director can
come from many different sources, including from the Company’s stockholders. The
Committee will therefore consider any nominee who meets the minimum
qualifications set forth below.
To propose a nominee, a stockholder
must provide the following information:
|
1.
|
The
stockholder’s name and, if different, the name of the holder of record of
the shares.
|
|
2.
|
The
stockholder’s address and telephone
number.
|
|
3.
|
The
name of the proposed nominee.
|
|
4.
|
The
address and phone number of the proposed
nominee.
|
|
5.
|
A
listing of the proposed nominee’s
qualifications.
|
|
6.
|
A
statement by the stockholder revealing whether the proposed nominee has
assented to the submission of her/his name by the
stockholder.
|
|
7.
|
A
statement from the stockholder describing any business or other
relationship with the nominee.
|
|
8.
|
A
statement from the stockholder stating why the stockholder believes the
nominee would be a valuable addition to the Company’s Board of
Directors.
|
The
stockholder should submit the required information to:
Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
c/o General Counsel
FalconStor Software, Inc.
2 Huntington Quadrangle
Suite 2S01
Melville,
NY 11747
With a
copy to:
Director Human Resources
FalconStor Software, Inc.
2 Huntington Quadrangle
Suite 2S01
Melville,
NY 11747
If any
information is missing, the proposed nominee will not be
considered.
II. Qualifications
for Candidates
The
Committee believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by
having directors from diverse backgrounds who can bring different skills to the
Company. It is therefore not possible to create a rigid list of qualifications
for Director candidates. However, absent unique circumstances, the Committee
expects that each candidate should have the following minimum
qualifications:
|
·
|
Substantial
experience with technology companies. This experience may be the result of
employment with a technology company or may be gained through other means,
such as financial analysis of technology
companies;
|
|
·
|
The
highest level of personal and professional ethics, integrity and
values;
|
|
·
|
An
inquiring and independent mind;
|
|
·
|
Practical
wisdom and mature judgment;
|
|
·
|
Expertise
that is useful to the Company and complementary to the background and
experience of other Board members, so that an optimal balance of Board
members can be achieved and
maintained;
|
|
·
|
Willingness
to devote the required time to carrying out the duties and
responsibilities of Board
membership;
|
|
·
|
Commitment
to serve on the Board for several years to develop knowledge about the
Company's business;
|
|
·
|
Willingness
to represent the best interests of all stockholders and to objectively
appraise management performance;
and
|
|
·
|
Involvement
only in activities or interests that do not conflict with the director's
responsibilities to the Company and its
stockholders.
|
At any
time, the Committee may be looking for director candidates with certain
qualifications or skills to replace departing directors or to complement the
skills of existing directors and to add to the value of the Board of
Directors.
III. Identification
and Evaluation of Candidates
Candidates
for director may come from many different sources including, among others,
recommendations from current directors, recommendations from management,
third-party search organizations, and stockholders.
In each
instance, the Committee will perform a thorough examination of the candidate. An
initial screening will be performed to ensure that the candidate meets the
minimum qualifications set forth above and has skills that would enhance the
Board of Directors. Following the initial screening, if the candidate is still
viewed as a potential nominee, the Committee will perform additional evaluations
including, among other things, some or all of the following: Detailed resume
review; personal interviews; interviews with employer(s); and interviews with
peer(s).
All
candidates will be reviewed to determine whether they meet the independence
standards of the Nasdaq Standards. Failure to meet the independence standards
may be a disqualifying factor based on the Board of Director’s composition at
the time. Even if failure to meet the independence standards is not by itself
disqualifying, it will be taken into account by the Committee in determining
whether the candidate would make a valuable contribution to the Board of
Directors.
Director
Compensation
Directors
who are also employees receive no compensation for serving on the Company’s
Board of Directors. Non-employee directors are reimbursed for all travel and
other expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and Committee
meetings.
From 2001
through 2006, the Company’s outside directors were compensated for regular
activities solely with options to purchase Company Common Stock. Based on a
review it conducted in the first quarter of 2007, the Company’s Compensation
Committee believed it was appropriate to make a change in the types of
compensation payable to the outside directors. It was determined to pay fees to
directors in a combination of cash and equity.
The cash
fee for outside directors is set at a base amount of $26,500 per director. The
chairperson of the Audit Committee receives an additional $10,000 per annum and
the chairpersons of any other Board committee receives an additional $5,000 per
annum. In addition, outside directors receive $3,000 per annum for each
committee on which they serve in a capacity other than chairperson. Cash
director fees are paid quarterly in arrears. Because all directors are expected,
absent unusual circumstances, to attend all meetings of the Board and all
meetings of the committees on which they serve, outside directors typically do
not receive any payment based on attendance at meetings. If circumstances
require an unusually large number of meetings, the Company may compensate
outside directors with additional cash in recognition of the increased time
devoted to Company matters.
In May 2007, the Company’s stockholders
approved the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2007 Outside Directors Equity
Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). Under the 2007 Plan as adopted, outside
directors receive annual grants of 5,000 options to purchase Company Common
Stock and 5,000 shares of restricted Company Common Stock. Both the options and
the restricted stock are granted on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and will vest 33% on the first anniversary of grant, 33% on the
second anniversary of grant, and 34% on the third anniversary of grant, as long
as the director has served the full period between Annual Meetings of
Stockholders. In addition, in the event that an outside director is unable to
continue service on the Board due to death, disability or a significant health
issue, or if, upon the expiration of an outside director’s term, the outside
director indicates his or her desire to be nominated as a director for an
additional term, but is not so nominated by the Company, then all restrictions
on unvested shares of restricted stock shall lapse on the last day the outside
director is a Company director.
In the first quarter of 2008, the
Compensation Committee reviewed the directors fee structure and determined that
the equity portion of the outside directors compensation should be paid only in
shares of restricted stock, rather than in a combination of restricted stock and
stock options. The Compensation Committee determined that the goals of
attracting and retaining qualified directors, and aligning the interests of
directors with other stockholders would be best served by this change. As a
result, the Company proposes to amend the 2007 Plan to provide that outside
directors will receive as equity compensation an automatic annual grant of
10,000 shares of restricted stock. The restricted stock will be granted on the
date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will vest 33% on the
first anniversary of grant, 33% on the second anniversary of grant, and 34% on
the third anniversary of grant, as long as the director has served the full
period between Annual Meetings of Stockholders. In addition, in the event that
an outside director is unable to continue service on the Board due to death,
disability or a significant health issue, or if, upon the expiration of an
outside director’s term, the outside director indicates his or her desire to be
nominated as a director for an additional term, but is not so nominated by the
Company, then all restrictions on unvested shares of restricted stock shall
lapse on the last day the outside director is a Company director. Further
details of these proposed changes may be found under the heading “Proposal No.
3” of this Proxy Statement.
The table below sets forth the
compensation received by our non-employee directors for the year
2007.
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid
in Cash
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
L. Bock (4)
|
|
$ |
21,103 |
|
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
|
$ |
93,801 |
|
|
$ |
126,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick
B. Carney (5)
|
|
$ |
22,401 |
|
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
|
$ |
72,212 |
|
|
$ |
106,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
S. Dolin (6)
|
|
$ |
22,401 |
|
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
|
$ |
64,395 |
|
|
$ |
98,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
R. Fischer (7)
|
|
$ |
25,648 |
|
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
|
$ |
64,395 |
|
|
$ |
102,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan
W. Kaufman (8)
|
|
$ |
21,103 |
|
|
$ |
12,012 |
|
|
$ |
78,020 |
|
|
$ |
111,135 |
|
|
(1)
|
Fees
were earned in 2007 and paid in both 2007 and
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
The
Company granted 5,000 shares of restricted stock to each non-employee
director on May 8, 2007 at a grant date fair value of $11.10
per share, that vest over three-years at 33%, 33% and 34%, respectively.
The dollar amounts in the table represent the compensation cost associated
with this award during 2007 in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
123(R).
|
|
(3)
|
The
dollar amounts represent the compensation costs associated with unvested
stock option awards recognized in 2007 in accordance with SFAS 123(R),
from current and prior years awards. Stock option awards granted under the
2004 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”) vest one-third
on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and one twenty-fourth of
the remainder vests each month thereafter for twenty-four months. Option
awards from the 2007 Plan vest over a three-year period at 33%, 33% and
34%, respectively on the anniversary of the date of
grant.
|
|
(4)
|
As
of December 31, 2007, the option and/or restricted stock awards
outstanding for Mr. Bock total 70,000 shares, of which 60,000 shares were
granted from the 2004 Plan and 10,000 shares were granted from the 2007
Plan.
|
|
(5)
|
As
of December 31, 2007, the option and/or restricted stock awards
outstanding for Mr. Carney totaled 85,000 shares, of which 20,000 were
granted from the 1994 Outside Directors Plan, 40,000 shares were granted
from the 2004 Plan, and 15,000 shares were granted from the 2007 Plan. Mr.
Carney also has 10,000 option awards outstanding from the 2000 Stock
Option Plan, which were awarded to Mr. Carney as an independent outside
consultant in 2002, prior to serving on the Company’s Board of
Directors.
|
|
(6)
|
As
of December 31, 2007, the option and/or restricted stock awards
outstanding for Mr. Dolin totaled 110,500 shares, of which 50,500 were
granted from the 1994 Outside Directors Plan, 45,000 shares were granted
from the 2004 Plan, and 15,000 shares were granted from the 2007
Plan.
|
|
(7)
|
As
of December 31, 2007, the option and/or restricted stock awards
outstanding for Mr. Fischer totaled 115,000 shares, of which 55,000 were
granted from the 1994 Outside Directors Plan, 45,000 shares were granted
from the 2004 Plan, and 15,000 shares were granted from the 2007
Plan.
|
|
(8)
|
As
of December 31, 2007, the option and/or restricted stock awards
outstanding for Mr. Kaufman totaled 70,000 shares, of which 60,000 shares
were granted from the 2004 Plan and 10,000 shares were granted from the
2007 Plan.
|
Contacting
the Board of Directors
Stockholders
and others may contact FalconStor’s Board of Directors by sending a letter
to:
Board of
Directors
FalconStor
Software, Inc.
2
Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 2S01
Melville,
NY 11747
or by
clicking on the “Contact FalconStor’s Board of Directors” link on the FalconStor
Corporate Governance home page at
www.falconstor.com/en/company/?pg=Governance.
Communications
directed to the Board of Directors are screened by the Company’s Legal and/or
Investor Relations departments. Routine requests for Company information are
handled by the appropriate Company department. Other communications are reviewed
to determine if forwarding to the Board of Directors is necessary or
appropriate. The Board of Directors receives a quarterly summary of all
communications that are not forwarded to the Board’s attention. All
communications are kept on file for one year for any Director who wishes to view
them.
Attendance
at Annual Meetings
The Company’s policy is that, except
for unusual circumstances, all board members should attend the Company’s Annual
Meetings of Stockholders. All board members other than Mr. Fischer, who was out
of the country, attended the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers of the Company
The
following table contains the names, positions and ages of the executive officers
of the Company who are not directors.
Name
|
Position
|
Age
|
Wayne
Lam
|
Vice
President,
Co-Founder
|
44
|
James
Weber
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President
|
37
|
Bernard
Wu
|
Vice
President, Business Development
|
50
|
Wayne Lam has served as a
vice president of the Company and its predecessor entity since April 2000. Mr.
Lam has more than 15 years of software development and corporate management
experience. As vice president at Computer Associates, he held various roles in
product marketing, business development and product development. Mr. Lam joined
Computer Associates in 1996 with its acquisition of Cheyenne Software, where he
held various positions including general manager of Cheyenne Software Netware
Division, director of business development, and head of Cheyenne Communications,
a business development unit focusing on communication software. From 1989 to
1993 he was co-founder and chief executive officer of Applied Programming
Technologies, where he managed all aspects of its operations and development
projects. From 1987 to 1989 he was vice president of engineering at Advanced
Graphic Applications, where he managed the development of PC-based document
management systems and optical storage device drivers. Mr. Lam has a B.E. in
Electrical Engineering from Cooper Union, where he was involved with a privately
funded research project studying the feasibility of building paperless offices
using optical storage devices. The success of the project led to the formation
of Advanced Graphic Applications.
James Weber has served as
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a Vice President since February 2004. Mr.
Weber has over 10 years of financial, accounting and management experience.
Prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Weber served as worldwide
Corporate Controller of the Company and its predecessor entity since April 2001.
From 1998 through 2001, Mr. Weber served as Corporate Controller for
theglobe.com, an Internet community. Before joining theglobe.com, Mr. Weber had
been an audit manager with KPMG and had several years of public accounting
experience. Mr. Weber is a Certified Public Accountant in the State of New York
and received his Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Fordham
University.
Bernard Wu has served as Vice
President of Business Development of the Company and its predecessor entity
since November 2000. From 1998 to October 2000, Mr. Wu was Senior Vice President
of sales and marketing for the Internet Outsourcing Division of Trend Micro, a
leading Internet security software company. Mr. Wu had worldwide responsibility
for defining, launching, and managing OEM, service, and alliance partnerships
with ISPs, ASPs, telecommunication carriers, and other software companies for
the purpose of offering network-based security services. Prior to that, Mr. Wu
had 15 years’ experience in various executive and managerial positions at
companies such as Intel, Seagate, Conner Peripherals, and Computer
Associates/Cheyenne in areas including product development, marketing, and
OEM/channel sales of RAID, optical, and tape-based storage management software
and subsystems. In 1996 he co-authored a patent in the area of SCSI enclosure
management services which has been widely adopted in the industry. Mr. Wu has a
BS/MS in engineering from the University of California at Berkeley and an MBA
from University of California at Los Angeles Anderson School of
Management.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
A. COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This section discusses the compensation
programs for our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our
other Executive Officers (each a “Named Executive Officer” or
“NEO”).
Roles
and Responsibilities
Our Compensation Committee is
responsible for, among other things, the establishment and review of
compensation policies and programs for our Named Executive Officers and ensuring
that these NEOs are compensated in a manner consistent with the objectives and
principals set forth below.
The Compensation Committee makes all
compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers. The Committee is
responsible for negotiating the terms of an employment agreement with our Chief
Executive Officer and for annually evaluating his performance. Our Chief
Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each of the other NEOs and
presents to the Compensation Committee his recommendations, including salary
adjustments and incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee may exercise
its discretion in modifying any recommended salary adjustments or awards to
these executives. The Committee also considers benchmark competitive
compensation market data, the compensation of other Company executives, and the
Named Executive Officers’ levels of responsibility, prior experience, breadth of
knowledge and job performance when making compensation decisions for all of our
Named Executive Officers.
The role of Company management is to
provide reviews and recommendations for the Compensation Committee’s
consideration and to manage operational aspects of the Company’s compensation
programs, policies, and governance. Direct responsibilities include, but are not
limited to, (i) providing an ongoing review of the effectiveness of the
compensation programs, including competitiveness and alignment with the
Company’s objectives, (ii) recommending changes, if necessary, to ensure
achievement of all program objectives and (iii) recommending equity awards for
officers and employees. Management also prepares tally sheets which set out all
components of total compensation for our Named Executive Officers, including
salary, incentive compensation and outstanding equity awards. The Compensation
Committee reviews and considers these tally sheets in making compensation
decisions for our Named Executive Officers.
Compensation
Objectives
For all Named Executive Officers,
compensation is intended to be performance-based. Our Compensation Committee
believes that compensation paid to executive officers should be closely aligned
with our performance on both a short-term and long-term basis to create value
for shareholders, and that such compensation should assist us in attracting and
retaining key executives critical to our long-term success.
In establishing compensation for our
Named Executive Officers, the following are the Compensation Committee's
objectives:
|
·
|
Attract
and retain individuals of superior ability and managerial
talent;
|
|
·
|
Ensure
officers’ compensation is aligned with our corporate strategies and
business objectives, and the long-term interests of our stockholders;
and
|
|
·
|
Enhance
the officers' incentive to maximize stockholder value, as well as promote
retention of key people, by providing a portion of total compensation for
management in the form of direct ownership in us through stock options and
grants of restricted stock.
|
To achieve these objectives, our
overall compensation program aims to pay our Named Executive Officers
competitively, consistent with our success and their contribution to that
success. To accomplish this we rely on programs that provide compensation in the
form of both cash and equity. Although our Compensation Committee has not
adopted any formal guidelines for allocating total compensation between cash and
equity, the Compensation Committee considers the balance between providing
short-term incentives and long-term parallel investment with stockholders to
align the interests of management with stockholders.
Consultants
and Benchmarking
We have not retained a compensation
consultant to review our policies and procedures with respect to executive
compensation, although the Compensation Committee may elect to retain such a
consultant in the future if it determines that so doing would be helpful in
developing, implementing or maintaining compensation plans.
The Compensation Committee conducts an
annual review of the aggregate level of our executive compensation, as well as
the mix of elements used to compensate our Named Executive Officers. In
addition, the Compensation Committee takes into account input from other
independent members of our board of directors and, to the extent available,
publicly available data relating to the compensation practices and policies of
other companies within and outside our industry. The Compensation Committee
compares our executive compensation against the compensation paid by these peer
companies. While such comparisons may not always be appropriate as a stand-alone
tool for setting compensation due to the aspects of our business and objectives
that may be unique to us, we generally believe that gathering this information
is an important part of our compensation-related decision-making
process.
For the year 2007, the Compensation
Committee considered data from technical companies of similar size to the
Company located within the same region as the Company and from companies with
the same SIC as the Company and whose annual revenues in their last reported
fiscal years were between $30 and $100 million and whose market capitalization
was between $300 and $1000 million. These companies were: Ansoft Corporation;
CommVault Systems, Inc.; Double-Take Software, Inc.; Omniture, Inc.; Opsware,
Inc.; Standard Microsystems Corp.; Taleo Corporation; and Vital Images,
Inc.
Although generally we believe that
executive base salaries should be targeted taking into consideration the median
of the range of salaries for executives in similar positions at comparable
companies, we recognize that, to attract, retain and motivate key individuals,
such as the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee may determine
that it is in our best interests to negotiate total compensation packages with
our Named Executive Officers that may deviate from the general principle of
targeting total compensation at the median level for the peer group. Actual pay
for each Named Executive Officer is determined around this structure, driven by
the performance of the Named Executive Officer over time, as well as our annual
performance.
Elements
of Compensation
Base
Salary
Base salaries for our executive
officers are established based on the scope of their responsibilities and
individual experience, taking into account competitive market compensation paid
by the benchmark companies. Base salaries are reviewed annually, and adjusted
from time to time to realign salaries with market levels after taking into
account individual responsibilities, performance and experience. Base salaries
are also adjusted annually to take into account performance-based
compensation.
Performance-Based
Compensation
We structure our annual incentive
program to reward executive officers based on our performance and the individual
executive's contribution to that performance. This allows executive officers to
receive such compensation based on the results that they helped us to achieve in
the previous year.
Mr.
Huai’s performance-based compensation is determined based on a formula found in
the Employment Agreement as is further discussed below under the heading
“Employment Agreement.”
From time to time, we will consider the
payment of discretionary bonuses to our executive officers on an annual basis
after the close of each fiscal year. Bonuses will be determined based, first,
upon the level of achievement of our strategic and operating goals and, second,
upon the level of personal achievement by participants. The achievement of our
goals includes, among other things, our performance as measured by the operating
results of the Company and the quality of our products. The achievement of
personal goals includes the actual performance of the department of the Company
for which the executive officer has responsibility as compared to the planned
performance, other individual contributions, the ability to manage and motivate
employees and the achievement of assigned projects. Despite achievement of
personal goals, bonuses might not be given based upon our performance. To date,
we have not granted any such discretionary bonuses.
Discretionary
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
The Compensation Committee is
responsible for determining the individuals who will be granted options and/or
restricted shares, the number of options and/or restricted shares each
individual will receive, and the terms of the options or restricted shares,
including the exercise period of each option, and the vesting period of each
option and/or restricted share. The number of stock options and/or restricted
shares granted to each executive officer is determined by the Compensation
Committee based upon several factors, including the executive officer's salary
grade, performance and the value of the stock options and/or restricted shares
at the time of grant. We grant options at the fair market value of the
underlying stock on the date of grant.
Medical
Insurance
We provide to each executive
officer, and to the executive officer's spouse and children, such medical and
dental insurance as we may from time to time make available to our other
full-time employees. All officers and full-time employees, regardless of
position, receive medical and dental insurance on the same terms.
Life
and Disability Insurance
Prior to
2007, we provided long-term disability insurance to all of our full-time
employees. Beginning in 2007, we provided both life insurance and
long-term disability insurance. We provide each executive officer such
disability and/or life insurance as we in our sole discretion may from time to
time make available to our other full-time employees. All officers and full-time
employees, regardless of position, receive the life and long-term disability
insurance on the same terms.
Employment
Agreements
We have an employment agreement with
our Chief Executive Officer. We do not have employment agreements with any other
Named Executive Officers.
The employment agreement with Mr. Huai
is used by the Company to establish key elements of the agreement between the
Company and Mr. Huai, including the proposed minimum period of employment and
the fundamental elements of compensation. The agreement also facilitates the
creation of covenants, such as those regarding competition during after the
employment period or limitations on the reasons for which Mr. Huai may be
terminated, that would not otherwise be part of the employment relationship. The
terms of the agreement with Mr. Huai are set out below in the section “Summary
Compensation Table.”
Severance
and Change in Control Agreements
The Named
Executive Officers are each participants in the 2005 Key Executive Severance
Protection Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The terms of the 2005 Plan are
terms of our severance and change in control agreements are set out below in the
section “Potential Payments Upon Severance or Change in Control.”
We created the 2005 Key Executive
Severance Protection Plan because we wanted to insure the continuity of
management if there was an actual or potential change in control event. The 2005
Plan provides peace of mind for the Named Executive Officers that their
livelihoods will not be affected by the actual or potential change in control.
This means that they will not be distracted by concerns for their own benefit
during such an event. In addition, the 2005 Plan helps to attract and to retain
the Name Executive Officers.
2008
Compensation Committee Report
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s 2008 Proxy
Statement. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis be included in the Company’s 2008 Proxy Statement.
Compensation
Committee:
Patrick
B. Carney
Lawrence
S. Dolin
Alan W.
Kaufman
B. Summary
Compensation Table
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Compensation Plan
(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ReiJane
Huai
Chairman
and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
360,133 |
|
|
$ |
635,133 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
109,723 |
|
|
$ |
384,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Weber
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,715 |
|
|
$ |
212,654 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
545,369 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,347 |
|
|
$ |
231,910 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
470,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
Lam
Vice
President
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,715 |
|
|
$ |
289,210 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
621,925 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,347 |
|
|
$ |
541,842 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
775,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Wu
Vice
President-Business Development
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
|
$ |
82,715 |
|
|
$ |
315,917 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
648,632 |
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,347 |
|
|
$ |
568,549 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
806,896 |
|
(1)
|
The
Company granted 20,000 and 28,000 restricted stock awards on August 7,
2006 and August 7, 2007, respectively, to Messrs. Weber, Lam, and Wu. The
dollar amounts in the table represent the total compensation expense
recognized for each respective period in accordance with SFAS 123(R). The
shares were granted on a discretionary basis and are subject to a
three-year vesting period. Please refer to footnote 8 of the Company’s
2007 annual report filed on Form 10-K for further information relating to
all share-based awards.
|
(2)
|
The
dollar amounts in the table represent the total compensation costs
recognized for each respective period related to unvested stock option
awards granted in prior years and recognized in accordance with SFAS
123(R). The stock options were granted on a discretionary basis and are
subject to a three-year vesting period. Please refer to footnote 8 of the
Company’s 2007 annual report filed on Form 10-K for further information
relating to all share-based awards.
|
(3)
|
During
2006, Messrs Weber, Lam and Wu earned cash bonuses of $30,000, $25,000 and
$30,000, respectively. These cash bonuses were awarded under the incentive
compensation program established by the Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors on August 7, 2006. Mr. Huai’s cash bonuses
for 2007 and 2006 were awarded in accordance with the criteria set forth
in the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the
Company and Mr. Huai, dated November 7, 2005. For more
information, see the “Narrative Discussion to Summary Compensation Table,”
below.
|
Narrative
Discussion to Summary Compensation Table
Mr. Huai’s salary and bonus for 2007
were in accordance with Mr. Huai’s employment agreement with the Company, which
expired December 31, 2007 (the “2004 Employment Agreement”). Under the 2004
Employment Agreement, Mr. Huai’s salary was $275,000. In addition, Mr. Huai was
entitled to a bonus based on the Company’s operating income and shareholder
equity. The bonus was determined by multiplying the Company’s operating income
by a percentage determined by dividing the operating income by stockholder
equity (the “Applicable Percentage”). The Applicable Percentage was determined
based on the following chart:
Operating
Income/Shareholder Equity
|
Applicable
Percentage
|
Less
than or equal to 5%
|
1.50%
|
Greater
than 5% but less than or equal to 10%
|
2.00%
|
Greater
than 10% but less than or equal to 15%
|
2.25%
|
Greater
than 15% but less than or equal to 20%
|
2.50%
|
Greater
than 20%
|
3.00%
|
For
purposes of the bonus calculation, share-based compensation expense recognized
in accordance with applicable accounting rules is excluded from our reported
operating income. We exclude this expense because we believe that operating
income without this expense is a better measure of the results of our day-to-day
operations and because it provides a more consistent basis for evaluating and
comparing our results across different periods.
The calculation of Mr. Huai’s bonus for
2007 is as follows:
GAAP
Operating Income
|
|
|
6,100,633 |
|
|
|
Excluded
Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123R
|
|
|
7,937,523 |
|
|
|
Huai
Bonus accrued through 12/31/07
|
|
|
367,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Operating Income
|
|
|
14,405,337 |
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
|
|
87,478,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huai
Bonus accrued through 12/31/07
|
|
|
367,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
87,845,558 |
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROIC
(A/B)
|
|
|
16.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
Amount
|
|
|
360,133 |
|
|
|
On December 31, 2007, the Company and
Mr. Huai entered into a new employment agreement for the period January 1, 2008
through December 31, 2010 (the “2008 Employment Agreement”). Mr. Huai’s base
salaries for the term of the 2008 Employment Agreement will be as
follows:
Calendar
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
2008
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
2009
|
|
$ |
341,000 |
|
2010
|
|
$ |
375,100 |
|
Mr.
Huai will also be eligible for annual bonuses under the 2008 Employment
Agreement. These bonuses will be equal to four percent of the Company’s net
operating income, on a fiscal year basis. For purposes of determining net
operating income, share-based compensation expense is excluded. The Compensation
Committee also has the discretion to exclude other extraordinary, non-recurring
or unusual items from the net operating income calculation. The bonus will be
paid in shares of restricted stock, which will vest 33%, 33% and 34% on January
1st
of each of the three years following the grant. The number of shares granted
will be determined by dividing the bonus amount by the average daily price of
the Company’s stock for the bonus year.
Under the 2008 Employment Agreement,
Mr. Huai is entitled to participate in all benefit programs generally available
to Company employees. The 2008 Employment Agreement also allows Mr. Huai to
continue to participate in the Company’s medical insurance program after his
departure, provided that Mr. Huai pays all premiums for his participation in
that program.
None of the other Named Executive
Officers has an employment agreement with the Company. The salaries
for these NEOs are set by the Compensation Committee using the criteria set
forth above in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section. From January
1, 2007 through April 30, 2007, the annual salary for each of these NEOs was
$190,000. On May 8, 2007, retroactive to April 1, 2007, the annual salary for
each of these NEOs was increased to $250,000.
Pursuant to a plan adopted by the
Compensation Committee in August, 2006, for the first quarter of 2007, Messrs.
Lam, Weber and Wu were each eligible to receive quarterly cash bonuses equal to
a maximum of 35% of their respective annual salaries. The quarterly amounts were
determined by our Chief Executive Officer based on the their individual
performance and were approved by the Compensation Committee. For the first
quarter, Messrs Weber, Lam and Wu earned cash bonuses for 2007 of $15,000
each.
C. Grants
of Plan-Based Awards For 2007
The
following table provides information related to plan-based awards granted to the
Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Company currently does not have any
plans providing for the grant of stock appreciation rights.
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
All
Other Stock Awards:
Number
of Shares of
Stock
or Units
(#)
(1)
|
|
Grant
Date Fair Value
of
Stock Awards
($/Share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ReiJane
Huai
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Weber
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
8/7/07
|
|
28,000
|
|
$
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
Lam
Vice
President
|
|
8/7/07
|
|
28,000
|
|
$
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Wu
Vice
President – Business Development
|
|
8/7/07
|
|
28,000
|
|
$
9.97
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects
restricted stock awards granted from the Company’s 2006 Incentive Stock
Plan. The award vests ratably 33%, 33%, and 34% per year on each
anniversary of the date of grant.
|
Narrative
Discussion to Grants of Plan-Based Awards Chart
As set forth above in the “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis,” the Company believes that part of the compensation for
the Named Executive Officers should be in the form of long-term equity grants so
as to align the interests of the NEOs with the Company’s
stockholders.
In accordance with this objective, each
of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Huai, was awarded 28,000 shares
of restricted stock on August 7, 2007. These shares vest over three years to
incentivize the NEOs to increase the long-term value of the Company and thereby
increase the value of its common stock.
In 2006 and 2007, the Company granted
restricted stock to certain of its officers, including the Named Executive
Officers, at the August meeting of the Compensation Committee. For 2008, the
Company has decided that long-term equity grants should only vest if the Company
meets certain goals. To that end, the Company granted 45,000 shares
of restricted stock to each of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Huai
in February 2008. These grants vest over three years. However, none of the
shares will vest if the Company does not meet its publicly announced targets of
revenues of $103 million and earnings per share of $0.35 for fiscal year 2008.
(Earnings per share will be calculated on the pro forma basis used by the
Company, which excludes share-based compensation expense and other
extraordinary, non-recurring or unusual events.)
D. Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year end 2007
The following table provides
information related to the aggregate outstanding equity awards which were
granted to the Company’s Named Executive Officers as of December 31,
2007.
|
Option
Awards
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
Name
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number
of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
|
ReiJane
Huai.
Chairman
and
Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Weber
Vice
President and
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
25,139
(1)
|
—
|
$0.35
|
10/31/2010
|
—
|
—
|
5,000
(2)
|
—
|
$6.20
|
11/4/2011
|
—
|
—
|
11,340
(3)
|
—
|
$5.07
|
5/6/2012
|
—
|
—
|
30,000
(4)
|
—
|
$4.04
|
11/10/2012
|
—
|
—
|
50,000
(5)
|
—
|
$5.33
|
5/14/2013
|
—
|
—
|
82,500
(6)
|
42,500
|
$8.20
|
1/5/2015
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
13,400
(7)
|
$150,884
(11)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
28,000
(8)
|
$315,280
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
Lam
Vice
President
|
75,000
(3)
|
—
|
$5.07
|
5/6/2012
|
—
|
—
|
130,000
(4)
|
—
|
$4.04
|
11/10/2012
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
(9)
|
—
|
$8.43
|
12/22/2013
|
—
|
—
|
112,200
(6)
|
57,800
|
$8.20
|
1/5/2015
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
13,400
(7)
|
$150,884
(11)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
28,000
(8)
|
$315,280
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Wu
Vice
President –
Business
Development
|
49,284
(4)
|
—
|
$4.04
|
11/10/2012
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
(9)
|
—
|
$8.43
|
12/22/2013
|
—
|
—
|
82,500
(6)
|
42,500
|
$8.20
|
1/5/2015
|
—
|
—
|
49,500
(10)
|
25,500
|
$6.80
|
11/6/2015
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
13,400
(7)
|
$150,884
(11)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
28,000
(8)
|
$315,280
(11)
|
(1)
|
Award
fully vested on October 31, 2003.
|
(2)
|
Award
fully vested on November 4, 2004.
|
(3)
|
Award
fully vested on May 6, 2005.
|
(4)
|
Award
fully vested on November 10, 2005.
|
(5)
|
Award
fully vested on May 14, 2006.
|
(6)
|
Award
was granted on January 6, 2005. The award vests 33%, 33% and 34% on each
anniversary over a three year
period.
|
(7)
|
Messrs.
Weber, Lam, and Wu were each awarded 20,000 shares of restricted stock on
August 7, 2006, which vest 33%, 33% and 34% on each anniversary over a
three-year period. On August 7, 2007, 6,600 restricted stock units
vested.
|
(8)
|
Messrs.
Weber Lam, and Wu were each awarded 28,000 shares of restricted stock on
August 7, 2007, which vest 33%, 33% and 34% on each anniversary over a
three-year period.
|
(9)
|
Award
fully vested on December 22, 2006.
|
(10)
|
Award
was granted on November 7, 2005. The award vests 33%, 33% and 34% on each
anniversary over a three-year
period.
|
(11)
|
The
Closing Price of the Company’s stock price on December 31, 2007 was $11.26
per share.
|
E. Option
Exercises and Stock Vested for 2007
The following table provides
information related to the exercise of stock options and the vesting of
restricted stock for the Company’s Named Executive Officers during the year
ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Number
of Shares Acquired on Vesting
|
|
|
Value
Realized on Vesting
|
|
Number
of Shares Acquired on Vesting
|
|
|
Value
Realized on Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ReiJane
Huai
Chairman
and ChiefExecutive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Weber
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
$ |
281,628 |
(1) |
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
$ |
65,538 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
Lam
Vice
President
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
$ |
321,711 |
(3) |
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
$ |
65,538 |
(2) |
|
|
26,900
|
|
|
$ |
286,706 |
(4) |
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,100
|
|
|
$ |
241,012 |
(5) |
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
78,743
|
|
|
$ |
838,904 |
(6) |
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$ |
203,400 |
(7) |
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Wu
Vice
President – Business Development
|
|
|
50,816
|
|
|
$ |
286,226 |
(8) |
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
$ |
65,538 |
(2) |
|
(1)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $10.06
per share.
|
|
(2)
|
Reflects
33% vesting of 20,000 shares of restricted stock awarded to each of
Messrs. Weber, Lam and Wu on August 7, 2006. The market price of the
Company’s stock at the vesting date was $9.93 per
share.
|
|
(3)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $11.07
per share.
|
|
(4)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $11.00
per share.
|
|
(5)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $10.78
per share.
|
|
(6)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $11.00
per share.
|
|
(7)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $14.21
per share.
|
|
(8)
|
The
market price of the Company’s stock at the option exercise date was $10.08
per share.
|
F. Potential
Payments Upon Severance or Change in Control
Severance
Agreements
The 2004
Employment Agreement provided for the payment of an amount equal to Mr. Huai’s
base salary for the prior year if the Company and Mr. Huai did not enter into a
new employment agreement for a term of at least two years, with an effective
date of January 1, 2008, on similar terms and conditions to the Employment
Agreement. The payment was to be made semi-monthly, in arrears, for the calendar
year 2008. No severance was due if: (1) Mr. Huai breached the confidentiality,
non-compete, or any other material provision of the employment agreement; (2)
Mr. Huai was terminated for cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement); (3)
the Company had offered a new agreement with a term of at least two years, on
similar terms and conditions, and Mr. Huai had declined to sign the new
agreement; or (4) Mr. Huai had received a change of control payment at least
equal to his base salary. In addition, if Mr. Huai had been
terminated for his willful failure to substantially perform his duties under the
2004 Employment Agreement, for reasons other than death or disability, the
Company would have been required to pay Mr. Huai his base salary for twelve
months. If at the time his employment was terminated Mr. Huai was a “specified
employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and
the regulations thereunder, to the extent required to comply with Section 409A,
payment would not have begun until one day after the day which is six months
following the termination date, with the first payment equaling six months of
base salary.
Pursuant
to the 2004 Employment Agreement, if Mr. Huai had been terminated or had not
been offered a new employment agreement, Mr. Huai would have been entitled to
$275,000.
The 2008
Employment Agreement provides for the payment of an amount equal to Mr. Huai’s
base salary for the prior year if the Company and Mr. Huai do not enter into a
new employment agreement for a term of at least two years, with an effective
date of January 1, 2011, on similar terms and conditions to the Employment
Agreement. The payment is to be made semi-monthly, in arrears, for the calendar
year 2012. No severance is due if: (1) Mr. Huai breached the confidentiality,
non-compete, or any other material provision of the employment agreement; (2)
Mr. Huai is terminated for cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement); (3)
the Company has offered a new agreement with a term of at least two years, on
similar terms and conditions, and Mr. Huai has declined to sign the new
agreement; or (4) Mr. Huai has received a change of control payment at least
equal to his base salary. In addition, if Mr. Huai is terminated for his willful
failure to substantially perform his duties under the 2008 Employment Agreement,
for reasons other than death or disability, the Company will be required to pay
Mr. Huai his base salary for twelve months. If at the time his employment is
terminated Mr. Huai is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder, to the extent
required to comply with Section 409A, payment will not begin until one day after
the day which is six months following the termination date, with the first
payment equaling six months of base salary.
Change
in Control Agreements
The
Company’s 2005 Key Executive Severance Protection Plan (the “2005 Plan”)
provides for payments to certain officers and employees of the Company,
including all of the Named Executive Officers, in the event that there is a
change in control of the Company and the individual’s employment is terminated
within twenty-four months of the change in control. These agreements were
entered into to ensure the continued service of the Named Executive Officers in
the event of a change in control.
For
purposes of the 2005 Plan, a “Change in Control” is deemed to have occurred
if:
|
·
|
more
than fifty percent of the Company’s voting securities, or the power to
vote more than fifty percent of the Company’s voting securities, is
acquired;
|
|
·
|
the
members of the Company’s board of directors cease to be a majority of the
board of directors following a
merger;
|
|
·
|
a
merger, consolidation or reorganization (a) with or into the Company, or
(b) in which securities of the Company are
issued;
|
|
·
|
a
complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company;
or
|
|
·
|
the
sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the
Company.
|
In the
event a Change in Control occurs, and a Named Executive Officer is terminated,
or the Named Executive Officer ends his employment for Good Reason, within two
years of the Change in Control, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to
certain severance benefits (“Severance Benefits”). The Named Executive Officer
is not entitled to severance benefits if the Named Executive Officer is
terminated: (a) for cause; (b) by reason of permanent disability; (c)
voluntarily by the Named Executive Officer other than for certain defined
reasons; or (d) by death. “Good Reason” for leaving employment
includes: (i) a diminution in the NEO’s title, offices or responsibilities; (ii)
a reduction in base salary; (iii) a material increase in commuting distance or
business travel requirements; (iv) a diminution in compensation or benefits; (v)
a breach of the 2005 Plan; or (vi) a purported termination for cause which does
not comply with the terms of the 2005 Plan.
The
Severance Benefits to which each of the Named Executive Officers would be
entitled are:
|
a.
|
a
payment equal to three times the Named Executive Officer’s base salary, on
an annualized basis, at the time of the Change in Control or, if greater,
at any time after the Change in
Control;
|
|
b.
|
a
payment equal to three times the highest annual bonus paid or payable to
the Named Executive Officer during the three years preceding the Change in
Control;
|
|
c.
|
the
continuation for three years for the Named Executive Officer and his
dependents and beneficiaries of basic life insurance, flexible spending
account, medical and dental benefits which were being provided immediately
prior to the Change in Control (or, if greater, at any time thereafter);
and
|
|
d1.
|
replacement
of all stock options granted by the Company, whether or not vested, with
an equal number of fully vested options to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock; or
|
|
d2.
|
if
the Company’s board of directors approves at the time, the surrender of
all options, whether vested or not, in return for a cash payment equal to
the difference between the full exercise price of each option surrendered
and the greater of: (1) the average price per share paid in connection
with the acquisition of control of the Company; (2) the price per share
paid in connection with any tender offer leading to control of the
Company; and (3) the mean between the high and the low selling price of
Company common stock on the relevant market on the date on which the Named
Executive Officer became entitled to receive Severance
Benefits.
|
In
addition, each of the Named Executive Officers is entitled to: (1) at the time
any such tax is due, a lump sum payment equal to the amount of any income tax
payable by the Named Executive Officer and attributable to the benefits set
forth in (c); and (2) in the event that any of the Severance Benefits is subject
to an excise tax, a payment in an amount grossed up so that the net payment,
after taxes, is equal to the excise tax.
The
following table sets forth the value of the severance benefits each Named
Executive Officer would be entitled to receive under the 2005 Plan assuming that
a Change in Control and the entitlement to receive Severance Benefits occurred
on December 31, 2007:
Severance
Benefit Component |
|
ReiJane
Huai |
|
|
James
Weber |
|
|
Wayne
Lam |
|
|
Bernard
Wu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 x
Base Salary
|
|
$ |
825,000 |
|
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
3 x
Bonus
|
|
$ |
1,080,399 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
3 x
Value of Benefits (1), (2)
|
|
$ |
34,554 |
|
|
$ |
34,470 |
|
|
$ |
34,470 |
|
|
$ |
40,413 |
|
Benefits
Income Tax Gross-Up (2), (3)
|
|
$ |
14,461 |
|
|
$ |
14,426 |
|
|
$ |
14,426 |
|
|
$ |
17,903 |
|
Excise
Tax Gross-Up (2), (4)
|
|
$ |
886,581 |
|
|
$ |
446,821 |
|
|
$ |
425,229 |
|
|
$ |
521,581 |
|
Stock
options-- Unvested and Accelerated (5)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
130,050 |
|
|
$ |
176,868 |
|
|
$ |
243,780 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,840,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,465,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,475,993 |
|
|
$ |
1,663,677 |
|
(1)
Benefits include medical benefits, dental benefits, and group-term life
insurance.
(2)
Assumes that the Named Executive Officer receives three full years of
benefits.
(3)
Assumes an effective federal income tax rate of 35% for all Named Executive
Officer, an effective 6.85% New York state tax rate for Messrs. Huai, Weber and
Lam, and an effective 9.3% California state tax rate for Mr. Wu.
(4)
Assumes an effective federal income tax rate of 35% and an effective FICA rate
of 1.45% for all Named Executive Officers, an effective 6.85% New York state tax
rate for Messrs. Huai, Weber and Lam, and an effective 9.3% California state tax
rate for Mr. Wu.
(5) The
value of unvested and accelerated stock options is the difference between the
exercise price of each option and $11.26, the closing price the Company’s common
stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on December 31, 2007. If the Company’s Board
of Directors is assumed to have approved the cashing out of stock options on
December 31, 2007, the value of unvested and accelerated stock options would
have been: Mr. Weber, $128,563; Mr. Lam, $174,845; and Mr. Wu, $241,400, based
on a mean value of the Company’s common stock of $11.23 on December 31,
2007.
Report on Repricing of
Options. None of the stock options granted under any of the
Company’s plans was repriced in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007.
Compensation Committee Interlock and
Insider Participation. Messrs. Patrick B. Carney, Lawrence S. Dolin, and
Alan W. Kaufman served as members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. There were no
relationships that require disclosure under Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation
S-K.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The Company currently does not have any
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders.
Plan Category
|
|
Number
of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants
and Rights (1)
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted
–Average exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(1)
(b)
|
|
Number
of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column
(a)(1)
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
10,165,024
|
|
|
$ |
6.45
|
|
|
|
1,856,526
|
|
(1)
|
As
of December 31, 2007.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None.
AMENDMENT TO THE
FALCONSTOR SOFTWARE, INC.,
2006
INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
PROPOSAL
NO. 2
The Board
of Directors proposes that the amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2006
Incentive Stock Plan (the “2006 Plan”) be approved.
The 2006
Plan is intended to assist the Company in securing and retaining employees,
officers, consultants and advisors (the “Participants”) by allowing them to
participate in the ownership and growth of the Company through the grant of
incentive and nonqualified stock options and shares of restricted stock. The
granting of such options and restricted stock serves as partial consideration
for, and gives the Participants an additional inducement to remain in, the
service of the Company and its subsidiaries and provides them with an increased
incentive to work towards the Company’s success. Shares of Common
Stock may be issued under the 2006 Plan upon the exercise of incentive stock
options, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), and nonqualified stock options, or to Participants with
such restrictions as determined by the Company.
The
proposed amendment relates to they type of awards that may be made pursuant to
the 2006 Plan. Currently, the Company may make grants of stock options or shares
of restricted stock. The Company proposes to amend the plan to enable the
Company to also make grants of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”), and to provide
terms for the grants of RSUs to officers and employees of its French subsidiary.
The national tax regime in France imposes significant costs on both the Company
and any grantee if shares of restricted stock are granted to French officers or
employees. RSUs are treated more favorably under the tax regime. The proposed
amendment would also allow the grant of RSUs to other Company
employees.
The Board
of Directors believes it is in the Company's and its stockholders' best
interests to approve the amendment to the 2006 Plan because it would ensure that
the Company is able to make meaningful incentive equity ownership grants to
officers and employees of its French subsidiary. The Board of Directors also
believes that because equity compensation is such a critical component of the
Company’s compensation structure, if the amendment is not approved the Company’s
ability to incentive these officers and employees will be
restricted.
The
proposed amendment to the 2006 Plan, is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement.
SUMMARY
OF THE 2006 PLAN
The
following summary of the 2006 Plan, assuming stockholder approval of the above
amendment, is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the 2006
Plan.
General. The 2006
Plan provides for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options,
restricted stock, and RSUs to employees, officers, consultants and advisors of
the Company.
Shares Subject to
Plan. Initially, a maximum of 1,500,000 of the authorized but
unissued or treasury shares of the common stock of the Company may be issued
upon the grant of restricted shares, upon the vesting of RSUs, or upon the
exercise of options granted under the 2006 Plan. Thereafter, if on July 1st of any
calendar year in which the Plan is in effect (the “Calculation Date”) the number
of shares of Stock with respect to which Options may be granted is less than
five percent (5%) of the number of outstanding shares of Stock, the number of
shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be increased so that
the number equals five percent (5%) of the shares of Stock outstanding on the
Calculation Date, but in no event shall the number of shares of Stock subject to
the Plan in the aggregate exceed twenty million shares, subject to adjustment as
provided in the next paragraph.
Upon
any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, recapitalization,
combination, reclassification, or similar change in the capital structure of the
Company, appropriate adjustments will be made to the shares subject to the 2006
Plan and to outstanding restricted shares, RSUs, and options. To the extent that
(i) any outstanding restricted share under the 2006 Plan expires or terminates
prior to the termination of the restrictions on restricted stock, (ii) any RSU
under the 2006 Plan expires or terminates prior to the termination of the
restrictions on the RSU, (iii) any options expires prior to the exercise in
full, or (iv) shares issued upon the exercise of an option are repurchased by
the Company, the shares of Common Stock for which such option is not exercised
or the repurchased shares shall be returned to the 2006 Plan and again become
available for grant. No Participant may be granted, in total, options to
purchase more than 300,000 of the shares authorized under the plan in any year.
In addition, no participant may receive RSUs if it would result in a Participant
owning more than 10% of the share capital of the Company.
Administration. The
2006 Plan will be administered by a Committee, consisting of two or more
Non-Employee members of the Board of Directors appointed by the Board of
Directors. The Committee will approve option, RSU and restricted share grants to
employees, officers, consultants and advisors of the Company, and will determine
the terms of any restrictions on restricted shares or RSUs, subject to the
provisions of the 2006 Plan. The Committee will also make any other
determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2006 Plan.
The determinations by the Committee will be final and conclusive. Currently, the
2006 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee.
Eligibility. Employees,
officers, consultants and advisors of the Company and is Subsidiaries are
eligible to participate in the 2006 Plan.
Terms and Conditions of
Options. Each option granted under the 2006 Plan is evidenced
by a written agreement between the Company and the optionee specifying the
number of shares subject to the option and the other terms and conditions of the
option, consistent with the requirements of the 2006 Plan. The purchase price of
each share of Common Stock purchasable under an incentive option shall be
determined by the Stock Option Committee at the time of grant, but shall not be
less than 100% of the fair value of such share of Common Stock on the date the
option is granted; provided, however, that with respect to a Participant who, at
the time such incentive option is granted, owns (within the meaning of Section
424(d) of the Internal Revenue Code) more than 10% of the total combined voting
power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Subsidiary, the purchase
price per share of Common Stock shall be at least 110% of the fair market value
per share of Common Stock on the date of grant. The purchase price of each share
of Common Stock purchasable under a nonqualified option shall not be less than
100% of the fair market value of such share of Common Stock on the date the
option is granted. Generally, the fair market value of the Common Stock will be
the closing price per share on the date of grant as reported on The Nasdaq
Global Market. The exercise price may be paid in cash, by check, or in cash
equivalent, by tender of shares of the Company's Common Stock owned by the
optionee having a fair market value not less than the exercise price, by the
assignment of the proceeds of a sale of some or all of the shares of Common
Stock being acquired upon the exercise of the option, or by any combination of
these. Not withstanding the foregoing, an optionee may not take any actions
which are prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and
regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other
agency thereunder.
Options
granted under the 2006 Plan become exercisable at such time or times and subject
to such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Committee at the time
of grant. The term of each option shall be determined by the Committee (but
shall not be more than 10 years after the date of grant), subject to earlier
termination in the event the optionee's service with the Company
ceases.
In
general, during the lifetime of the optionee, the option may be exercised only
by the optionee and may not be transferred or assigned, except by will or the
laws of descent and distribution. However, the 2006 Plan provides that, with the
consent of the Committee, an optionee may transfer a nonqualified option to (i)
a trust for the exclusive benefit of the optionee or (ii) a member of the
optionee’s immediate family (or a trust for his or her benefit).
Upon a
Change of Control of the Company, the Company will replace all unexercised stock
options with an equal number of unrestricted and fully vested stock options to
purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Alternatively, upon a Change of
Control, and subject to Board approval at the time, an optionee may elect to
surrender any unexercised options and to receive in return from the Company a
cash payment equal to the difference between the exercise price of each option
surrendered and the greater of (i) the average price per share paid in
connection with the acquisition of the Company, (ii) the price per share paid in
connection with any tender offer for shares of the Company’s common stock
leading to control, and (iii) the mean between the high and the low selling
prices of such stock on the Nasdaq Global Market or other market on which the
Company’s common stock is then traded on the date of the Change of
Control.
Simultaneously with the granting of an
option the Committee may also grant dividend equivalent rights equal to the
number of shares of common stock underlying the option multiplied by the
per-share cash dividend or per-share market value of a non-cash dividend. This
provision shall only apply to special dividends of the Company.
Terms and Conditions of Restricted
Stock. A grantee of restricted stock has no right to an award
of restricted stock until the grantee accepts the award within the timeframe
prescribed by the Committee and, if the Committee requires, makes payment to the
Company in cash, or by check or other acceptable instrument. Certificate(s) are
issued in the grantee’s name after acceptance of the award by the grantee, but
are not delivered to the Grantee until the shares are free of any restrictions
specified by the Committee at the time grant.
Shares of
restricted stock are forfeitable until the terms of the restricted stock grant
have been satisfied. Shares of restricted stock are not transferable until the
date on which the Committee has specified such restrictions have lapsed. Unless
otherwise provided by the Committee at or after grant, distributions in the form
of dividends or otherwise of additional shares or property in respect of shares
of restricted stock shall be subject to the same restrictions as such shares of
restricted stock.
Upon the
occurrence of a change in control of the Company, the Committee may accelerate
the vesting of outstanding restricted stock, in whole or in part, as determined
by the Committee, in its sole discretion.
Unless
otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, in the event the
grantee ceases to be an employee or otherwise associated with the Company for
any other reason, all shares of restricted stock previously awarded to him which
are still subject to restrictions will be forfeited and the Company will have
the right to complete a blank stock power. The Committee may provide (on or
after grant) that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to shares of
restricted stock will be waived in whole or in part in the event of termination
resulting from specified causes, and the Committee may in other cases waive in
whole or in part restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to restricted
stock.
Terms and Conditions of Restricted
Stock Units. A grantee of a RSU has no right to an award of an
RSU until the grantee accepts the award within the timeframe prescribed by the
Committee and, if the Committee requires, makes payment to the Company in cash,
or by check or other acceptable instrument. Certificate(s) are issued in the
grantee’s name after vesting of the RSUs, but are not delivered to the Grantee
until the shares are free of any additional restrictions specified by the
Committee at the time grant.
RSUs are
forfeitable until the terms of the RSU grant have been satisfied. RSUs are not
transferable until the date on which the Committee has specified such
restrictions have lapsed. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee at or after
grant, distributions in the form of dividends or otherwise of additional shares
or property in respect of RSUs shall be subject to the same restrictions as such
RSUs.
Upon the
occurrence of a change in control of the Company, the Committee may accelerate
the vesting of outstanding RSUs, in whole or in part, as determined by the
Committee, in its sole discretion.
Unless
otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, in the event the
grantee ceases to be an employee or otherwise associated with the Company for
any other reason, all RSUs previously awarded to him which are still subject to
restrictions will be forfeited and the Company will have the right to complete a
blank stock power. The Committee may provide (on or after grant) that
restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to RSUs will be waived in whole
or in part in the event of termination resulting from specified causes, and the
Committee may in other cases waive in whole or in part restrictions or
forfeiture conditions relating to RSUs.
Termination or Amendment.
Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the 2006 Plan will terminate on April 3,
2016. The 2006 Plan provides that it may be terminated or amended by the Board
at any time, subject to stockholder approval only if such amendment would
increase the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance
thereunder.
SUMMARY
OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Incentive Stock
Options. In general, no taxable income for federal income tax
purposes will be recognized by an option holder upon receipt or exercise of an
incentive stock option, and the Company will not then be entitled to any tax
deduction. Assuming that the option holder does not dispose of the option shares
before the later of (i) two years after the date of grant or (ii) one year after
the exercise of the option, upon any such disposition, the option holder will
recognize capital gain equal to the difference between the sale price on
disposition and the exercise price.
If,
however, the option holder disposes of his option shares prior to the expiration
of the required holding period, he will recognize ordinary income for federal
income tax purposes in the year of disposition equal to the lesser of (i) the
difference between the fair market value of the shares at the date of exercise
and the exercise price, or (ii) the difference between the sale price upon
disposition and the exercise price. Any additional gain on such disqualifying
disposition will be treated as capital gain. In addition, if such a
disqualifying disposition is made by the option holder, the Company will be
entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the
option holder provided that such amount constitutes an ordinary and reasonable
expense of ours.
Non-Qualified Stock Options.
No taxable income will be recognized by an option holder upon receipt of a
nonqualified stock option, and the Company will not be entitled to a tax
deduction for such grant.
Upon the
exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the option holder will generally
include in taxable income, for federal income tax purposes, the excess in value
on the date of exercise of the shares acquired pursuant to the nonqualified
stock option over the exercise price. Upon a subsequent sale of the shares, the
option holder will derive short-term or long-term gain or loss, depending upon
the option holder’s holding period for the shares, commencing upon the exercise
of the option, and upon the subsequent appreciation or depreciation in the value
of the shares.
The
Company generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time that
the participant is required to include the value of the shares in his
income.
Restricted
Shares. Restricted stock may be granted under this Plan aside
from, or in association with, any other award. A participant shall have no
rights to an award of restricted stock unless and until the participant accepts
the award, and if the Committee shall deem it desirable, makes payments to the
Company of cash, or by check. After acceptance and the issuance of a stock
certificate, the participant shall have all the rights of a stockholder with
respect to the restricted stock.
The
Company shall issue in the participant’s name a certificate for the shares of
Common Stock associated with the award of restricted stock; however, unless
otherwise provided, the certificate shall not be delivered to the participant
until such shares are free of any restrictions specified by the Committee at the
time of grant. Shares of restricted stock are forfeitable until the terms of the
restricted stock grant have been satisfied, and shares of restricted stock may
not be transferred until all restrictions have lapsed. Upon a Change of Control,
the Committee may accelerate the vesting of outstanding restricted stock, in its
sole discretion.
Restricted Stock
Units. Grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to
French resident individuals give rise to a 10% employer contribution due at
grant on the value of the shares at grant, which contribution is nonrefundable
even if the RSUs do not vest; and a 2.5% employee contribution due at sale on
the value of the shares transferred when the RSUs vest. At the time the shares
are sold, tax is assessed at 41% (30% income tax, 11% additional contributions)
on the market value of shares on the date of vesting of the shares, referred to
as the gain on acquisition; and a 27% tax (16% income tax, 11% additional
contributions) on the difference between the sale price of the shares and their
market value on the date of vesting. The amount of gain on the sale is reduced
by one-third for each full year of ownership from the sixth one. Also, the gain
on sale is subject to tax only when the total proceeds of sales of securities
realized by the taxpayer and his household during the relevant year exceed a
certain threshold, currently EUR 20,000. Finally, any loss on the sale,
reflecting a decline in value between vesting and sale, offsets the gain on
acquisition.
RSUs are
taxable to United States residents in the year that they vest as ordinary
income, and the Company is entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount and at
the same time as the grantee recognizes income. Because RSUs are subject to
Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, employees generally will not be able to
defer taxation. The RSUs will also be subject to FICA and Medicare taxation in
the years the RSUs vest.
Dividend Equivalents.
Assuming that the provisions relating to nonqualified deferred compensation set
forth in Section 409A of the Code are inapplicable, no taxable income will be
recognized by an option holder upon receipt of a dividend equivalent right and
the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction upon the grant of such
right.
Upon the
exercise of the stock option and receipt of cash or property with respect to the
dividend equivalent right, the option holder will include in taxable income, for
federal income tax purposes, the fair market value of the cash and other
property received with the respect to the dividend equivalent right and the
Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding tax
deduction.
As
indicated above, the tax treatment of dividend equivalent rights is not clear.
The Act contains provisions applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation
plans, which, if certain conditions are not met, could result in the immediate
taxation of income and the imposition of interest and additional
tax.
AMENDED
PLAN BENEFITS
The
following table sets forth the stock option and stock awards outstanding under
the 2006 Plan as of the record date, March 21, 2008.
Name
|
|
Stock
Option Awards Outstanding: Number of Shares or Options
(#)
|
|
All
Other Stock Awards Outstanding: Number of Shares of Stock or
Units
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ReiJane
Huai
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
James
Weber
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
|
–
|
|
86,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne
Lam
Vice
President
|
|
–
|
|
86,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bernard
Wu
Vice
President – Business Development
|
|
–
|
|
86,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Named Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
–
|
|
259,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive
Directors and Director Nominees as Group (1)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Executive
Officer Employees as a Group
|
|
2,080,213
|
|
575,350
|
|
(1)
|
Does
not include 440,500 stock options and/or restricted shares granted to
current non-employee Directors pursuant to the 1994, 2004 and 2007 Outside
Director Stock Option Plans.
|
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC., 2006 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN.
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC., 2007
OUTSIDE
DIRECTORS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
PROPOSAL
NO. 3
The Board
of Directors proposes that the amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2007
Outside Directors Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”) be
approved.
The 2007
Plan is intended to assist the Company in securing and retaining qualified
outside directors (the “Directors”) by allowing them to participate in the
ownership and growth of the Company through the grant of incentive and
nonqualified stock options and shares of restricted stock. The granting of such
options and restricted stock serves as partial consideration for, and gives the
Directors an additional inducement to remain in, the service of the Company and
its subsidiaries and provides them with an increased incentive to work towards
the Company’s success. Shares of Common Stock may be issued under the 2007 Plan
upon the exercise of nonqualified stock options, or to Directors with such
restrictions as determined by the Company.
The
proposed amendment relates to the number of stock options and the number of
shares of restricted stock that will be granted to Directors each year. Under
the 2007 Plan as adopted, beginning with the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, each Director receives an annual grant of 5,000 options to
purchase Company Common Stock and 5,000 shares of restricted Company Common
Stock. Both the options and the restricted stock are granted on the date of the
Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders and will vest 33% on the first
anniversary of grant (i.e., the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders), 33% on the
second anniversary of grant (i.e., the following Annual Meeting of
Stockholders), and 34% on the third anniversary of grant (i.e., the following
Annual Meeting of Stockholders), as long as the director has served the full
period between Annual Meetings of Stockholders.
The
proposed amendment changes the grants from a split of options and restricted
stock to all restricted stock. If the amendment is approved, each Director will
receive an annual grant of 10,000 shares of restricted Company Common Stock. The
restricted stock will be granted on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and will vest 33% on the first anniversary of grant (i.e., the next
Annual Meeting of Stockholders), 33% on the second anniversary of grant (i.e.,
the following Annual Meeting of Stockholders), and 34% on the third anniversary
of grant (i.e., the following Annual Meeting of Stockholders), as long as the
director has served the full period between Annual Meetings of Stockholders. In
addition, in the event that an outside director is unable to continue service on
the Board due to death, disability or a significant health issue, or if, upon
the expiration of an outside director’s term, the outside director indicates his
or her desire to be nominated as a director for an additional term, but is not
so nominated by the Company, then all restrictions on unvested shares of
restricted stock shall lapse on the last day the outside director is a Company
director.
The Board
of Directors believes it is in the Company's and its stockholders' best
interests to approve the amendment to the 2007 Plan. The Board of Directors
believes that the goals of attracting and retaining qualified directors, and
aligning the interests of directors with other stockholders would be best served
by this change.
The
proposed amendment 2007 Plan is attached as Exhibit B to this Proxy
Statement.
SUMMARY
OF THE 2007 PLAN
The
following summary of the 2007 Plan, assuming stockholder approval of the 2007
Plan, is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the 2007
Plan.
General. The 2007
Plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options, and restricted stock,
to outside directors of the Company.
Shares Subject to
Plan. A maximum of 300,000 of the authorized but unissued or
treasury shares of the common stock of the Company may be issued upon the grant
of restricted shares or upon the exercise of options granted under the 2007
Plan. Upon any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split,
recapitalization, combination, reclassification, or similar change in the
capital structure of the Company, appropriate adjustments will be made to the
shares subject to the 2007 Plan and to outstanding restricted shares and
options. To the extent that (i) any outstanding restricted share or under the
2007 Plan expires or terminates prior to the termination of the restrictions on
restricted stock, (ii) any options expires prior to the exercise in full, or
(iii) shares issued upon the exercise of an option are repurchased by the
Company, the shares of Common Stock for which such option is not exercised or
the repurchased shares shall be returned to the 2007 Plan and again become
available for grant. No Participant may be granted, in total, options to
purchase more than 15% of the shares authorized under the plan.
Administration. The
2007 Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors. The Board will approve
option and restricted share grants to Directors and will determine the terms of
any restrictions on restricted shares, subject to the provisions of the 2007
Plan. The Board will also make any other determinations necessary or advisable
for the administration of the 2007 Plan. The determinations by the Board will be
final and conclusive.
Eligibility. Outside
directors of the Company are eligible to participate in the 2007
Plan.
Terms and Conditions of
Options. Each option granted under the 2007 Plan is evidenced
by a written agreement between the Company and the optionee specifying the
number of shares subject to the option and the other terms and conditions of the
option, consistent with the requirements of the 2007 Plan. The purchase price of
each share of Common Stock purchasable under a nonqualified option shall not be
less than 100% of the fair market value of such share of Common Stock on the
date the option is granted. Generally, the fair market value of the Common Stock
will be the closing price per share on the date of grant as reported on The
Nasdaq Global Market. The exercise price may be paid in cash, by check, or in
cash equivalent, by tender of shares of the Company's Common Stock owned by the
optionee having a fair market value not less than the exercise price, by the
assignment of the proceeds of a sale of some or all of the shares of Common
Stock being acquired upon the exercise of the option, or by any combination of
these. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an optionee may not take any actions,
which are prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules and
regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other
agency thereunder.
Options
granted under the 2007 Plan become exercisable at such time or times and subject
to such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Committee at the time
of grant. The term of each option shall be determined by the Committee (but
shall not be more than 10 years after the date of grant), subject to earlier
termination in the event the optionee's service with the Company
ceases.
In
general, during the lifetime of the optionee, the option may be exercised only
by the optionee and may not be transferred or assigned, except by will or the
laws of descent and distribution. However, the 2007 Plan provides that, with the
consent of the Committee, an optionee may transfer a nonqualified option to: (i)
an Immediate Family Member (as described in the 2007 Plan); (ii) a trust for the
exclusive benefit of the Director and/or one or more Immediate Family Members;
(iii) a partnership in which the Director and/or one or more Immediate Family
Members are the only partners; or (iv) such other person or entity as the Board
of Directors may permit.
Upon a
Change of Control of the Company, the Company will replace all unexercised stock
options with an equal number of unrestricted and fully vested stock options to
purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Alternatively, upon a Change of
Control, and subject to Board approval at the time, an optionee may elect to
surrender any unexercised options and to receive in return from the Company a
cash payment equal to the difference between the exercise price of each option
surrendered and the greater of (i) the average price per share paid in
connection with the acquisition of the Company, (ii) the price per share paid in
connection with any tender offer for shares of the Company’s common stock
leading to control, and (iii) the mean between the high and the low selling
prices of such stock on the Nasdaq Global Market or other market on which the
Company’s common stock is then traded on the date of the Change of
Control.
Simultaneously with the granting of an
option the Committee may also grant dividend equivalent rights equal to the
number of shares of common stock underlying the option multiplied by the
per-share cash dividend or per-share market value of a non-cash dividend. This
provision shall only apply to special dividends of the Company.
Terms and Conditions of Restricted
Stock. A grantee of restricted stock has no right to an award
of restricted stock until the grantee accepts the award within the timeframe
prescribed by the Committee and, if the Committee requires, makes payment to the
Company in cash, or by check or other acceptable instrument. Certificate(s) are
issued in the grantee’s name after acceptance of the award by the grantee, but
are not delivered to the Grantee until the shares are free of any restrictions
specified by the Committee at the time grant.
Shares of
restricted stock are forfeitable until the terms of the restricted stock grant
have been satisfied. Shares of restricted stock are not transferable until the
date on which the Committee has specified such restrictions have lapsed. Unless
otherwise provided by the Committee at or after grant, distributions in the form
of dividends or otherwise of additional shares or property in respect of shares
of restricted stock shall be subject to the same restrictions as such shares of
restricted stock.
Upon the
occurrence of a change in control of the Company, the Committee may accelerate
the vesting of outstanding restricted stock, in whole or in part, as determined
by the Committee, in its sole discretion.
Unless
otherwise determined by the Committee at or after grant, in the event the
grantee ceases to be an employee or otherwise associated with the Company for
any other reason, all shares of restricted stock previously awarded to him which
are still subject to restrictions will be forfeited and the Company will have
the right to complete a blank stock power. The Committee may provide (on or
after grant) that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to shares of
restricted stock will be waived in whole or in part in the event of termination
resulting from specified causes, and the Committee may in other cases waive in
whole or in part restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to restricted
stock.
Termination or Amendment.
Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the 2007 Plan will terminate on May 8,
2017. The 2007 Plan provides that it may be terminated or amended by the Board
at any time, subject to stockholder approval only if such amendment would
increase the total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance
thereunder.
SUMMARY
OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Non-Qualified Stock
Options. No taxable income will be recognized by an option
holder upon receipt of a nonqualified stock option, and the Company will not be
entitled to a tax deduction for such grant.
Upon the
exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the option holder will generally
include in taxable income, for federal income tax purposes, the excess in value
on the date of exercise of the shares acquired pursuant to the nonqualified
stock option over the exercise price. Upon a subsequent sale of the shares, the
option holder will derive short-term or long-term gain or loss, depending upon
the option holder’s holding period for the shares, commencing upon the exercise
of the option, and upon the subsequent appreciation or depreciation in the value
of the shares.
The
Company generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time that
the participant is required to include the value of the shares in his
income.
Restricted Shares. Restricted
stock may be granted under this Plan aside from, or in association with, any
other award. A participant shall have no rights to an award of restricted stock
unless and until the participant accepts the award, and if the Committee shall
deem it desirable, makes payments to the Company of cash, or by check. After
acceptance and the issuance of a stock certificate, the participant shall have
all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the restricted
stock.
The
Company shall issue in the participant’s name a certificate for the shares of
Common Stock associated with the award of restricted stock; however, unless
otherwise provided, the certificate shall not be delivered to the participant
until such shares are free of any restrictions specified by the Committee at the
time of grant. Shares of restricted stock are forfeitable until the terms of the
restricted stock grant have been satisfied, and shares of restricted stock may
not be transferred until all restrictions have lapsed. Upon a Change of Control,
the Committee may accelerate the vesting of outstanding restricted stock, in its
sole discretion.
Dividend Equivalents.
Assuming that the provisions relating to nonqualified deferred compensation set
forth in Section 409A of the Code are inapplicable, no taxable income will be
recognized by an option holder upon receipt of a dividend equivalent right and
the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction upon the grant of such
right.
Upon the
exercise of the stock option and receipt of cash or property with respect to the
dividend equivalent right, the option holder will include in taxable income, for
federal income tax purposes, the fair market value of the cash and other
property received with the respect to the dividend equivalent right and the
Company will generally be entitled to a corresponding tax
deduction.
As
indicated above, the tax treatment of dividend equivalent rights is not clear.
The Act contains provisions applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation
plans, which, if certain conditions are not met, could result in the immediate
taxation of income and the imposition of interest and additional
tax.
The Board believes it is in the
Company's best interests to approve the 2007 Plan, which would allow the Company
to continue to grant options, and to grant restricted stock, to secure for the
Company the benefits of the additional incentive inherent in the ownership of
shares of the Company's Common Stock by outside directors and to help the
Company secure and retain the services of outside directors.
AMENDED
PLAN BENEFITS
The
following table sets forth the stock option and stock awards outstanding under
the 2007 Plan as of the record date, March 21, 2008.
Director’s
Name
|
|
Stock
Option Awards Outstanding: Number of Shares or Options
(#)
|
|
All
Other Stock Awards Outstanding: Number of Shares of Stock or
Units
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
L. Bock
|
|
5,000
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick
B. Carney
|
|
10,000
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence
S. Dolin
|
|
10,000
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
R. Fischer
|
|
10,000
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan
W. Kaufman
|
|
5,000
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
Directors as a Group (1)
|
|
40,000
|
|
25,000
|
(1) Does
not include options to purchase 375,500 shares granted to current non-employee
Directors pursuant to the 1994 and 2004 Outside Director Stock Option
Plans.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT TO THE FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC., 2007 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PROPOSAL
NO. 4
The
accounting firm of KPMG LLP has been selected as the independent registered
public accounting firm to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. Although the selection of
accountants does not require ratification, the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors has directed that the appointment of KPMG LLP be submitted to
stockholders for ratification due to the significance of their appointment by
the Company. If stockholders do not ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, the
Audit Committee will consider the appointment of another independent registered
public accounting firm. A representative of KPMG LLP, which served as the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007, is expected to be present at the Meeting and, if he so
desires, will have the opportunity to make a statement, and in any event will be
available to respond to appropriate questions.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Fees for
services rendered by KPMG LLP for the years 2007 and 2006 fell into the
following categories:
Audit Fees: Fees
billed for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audits of the
Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the reviews of the interim condensed
consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-Qs during
such fiscal years. These fees also include the audits of internal control over
financial reporting, required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. The 2006 audit fees include $110,000 for additional audit fees related to
2006, but billed and paid during 2007.
Audit Related Fees: Fees
billed for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for audit related
services, primarily including consents in connection with registration
statements filed by the Company.
Tax Fees: Fees
billed for tax-related services rendered by KPMG LLP to the
Company.
All Other Fees: Fees billed
for on-line resource tools provided by KPMG LLP for the year 2007. There were no
other fees provided by KPMG LLP to the Company in 2006.
The approximate fees for each category
were as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Description
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Audit
Fees
|
|
$ |
677,081 |
|
|
$ |
696,177 |
|
Audit
Related Fees
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
Tax
Fees
|
|
$ |
32,769 |
|
|
$ |
47,033 |
|
All
Other Fees
|
|
$ |
1,629 |
|
|
|
– |
|
The Audit
Committee has considered whether the provision by KPMG LLP of the services
covered by the fees other than the audit fees is compatible with maintaining
KPMG LLP’s independence and believes that it is compatible.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE SELECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval
Procedures. The Audit Committee has adopted the following guidelines
regarding the engagement of the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm to perform services for the Company:
For audit services (including
statutory audit engagements as required under local country laws), the
independent registered public accounting firm will provide the Audit Committee
with an engagement letter during the first quarter of each year outlining the
scope of the audit services proposed to be performed during the fiscal year. If
agreed to by the Audit Committee, this engagement letter will be formally
accepted by the Audit Committee at a meeting of the Audit
Committee.
The independent registered
public accounting firm will submit to the Audit Committee for approval an audit
services fee proposal after acceptance of the engagement letter.
For non-audit services, Company
management will submit to the Audit Committee for approval (during the second
quarter of each fiscal year) the list of non-audit services that it recommends
the Audit Committee engage the independent registered public accounting firm to
provide for the fiscal year. Company management and the independent registered
public accounting firm will each confirm to the Audit Committee that each
non-audit service on the list is permissible under all applicable legal
requirements. In addition to the list of planned non-audit services, a budget
estimating non-audit service spending for the fiscal year will be provided. The
Audit Committee will approve both the list of permissible non-audit services and
the budget for such services. The Audit Committee will be informed routinely as
to the non-audit services actually provided by the independent registered public
accounting firm pursuant to this pre-approval process.
To ensure prompt handling of
unexpected matters, the Audit Committee delegates to the Chair the authority to
amend or modify the list of approved permissible non-audit services and fees.
The Chair will report action taken to the Audit Committee at the next Audit
Committee meeting.
The independent registered
public accounting firm must ensure that all audit and non-audit services
provided to the Company have been approved by the Audit Committee. The Company
Controller will be responsible for tracking all independent registered public
accounting firm fees against the budget for such services and report at least
annually to the Audit Committee.
Audit
Committee Report
The Board
of Directors appoints an Audit Committee each year to review the Company’s
financial matters. Please see the Audit Committee discussion in
the Board of Directors
section, above, for a discussion of the Audit Committee.
The
Audit Committee meets with KPMG LLP (the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm) and reviews the scope of their audit, report and
recommendations. The Audit Committee members reviewed and discussed the audited
consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007 with management. The Audit Committee also discussed all matters
required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit
Committees, as currently in effect, with KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee
received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP as required by
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees, as currently in effect, and has discussed the independence of
KPMG LLP with representatives of such firm.
Based on
their review and the discussions described above, the Audit Committee
recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated
financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, to be filed with the SEC.
Audit
Committee
Steven L.
Bock
Lawrence
S. Dolin
Steven R.
Fischer
SOLICITATION
STATEMENT
The
Company will bear all expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies.
In addition to the use of the mail, solicitations may be made by the Company’s
regular employees, by telephone, telegraph or personal contact, without
additional compensation. The Company will, upon their request, reimburse
brokerage houses and persons holding shares of Common Stock in the names of the
Company’s nominees for their reasonable expenses in sending solicited material
to their principals.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
In order
to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in
connection with the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company,
stockholder proposals for such meeting must be submitted to the Company no later
than December 8, 2008.
On May
21, 1998 the SEC adopted an amendment to Rule 14a-4, as promulgated under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The amendment to Rule
14a-4(c)(1) governs the Company’s use of its discretionary proxy voting
authority with respect to a stockholder proposal, which is not addressed in the
Company’s proxy statement. The amendment provides that if the Company does not
receive notice of the proposal at least 45 days prior to the first anniversary
of the date of mailing of the prior year’s proxy statement, then the Company
will be permitted to use its discretionary voting authority when the proposal is
raised at the annual meeting, without any discussion of the matter in the proxy
statement.
With
respect to the Company’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, if the Company is
not provided notice of a stockholder proposal, which has not been timely
submitted, for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement by February 21, 2009
the Company will be permitted to use its discretionary voting authority as
outlined above.
OTHER
MATTERS
So far as
now known, there is no business other than that described above to be presented
for action by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, but it is intended that
the proxies will be voted upon any other matters and proposals that may legally
come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof, in accordance with
the discretion of the persons named therein.
ANNUAL
REPORT
The
Company has sent, or is concurrently sending, to all of its stockholders of
record as of March 21, 2008 a copy of its Annual Report for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007. Such report contains the Company’s audited consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
By
Order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
/s/
Seth R. Horowitz
|
|
Seth
R. Horowitz
|
Secretary
|
Melville,
NY
Dated:
April 4, 2008
The Company will furnish a free copy
of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
(without exhibits) to all of its stockholders of record as of March 21, 2008 who
will make a written request to Mr. James Weber, Chief Financial Officer,
FalconStor Software, Inc., 2 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 2S01, Melville, New
York 11747.
EXHIBIT
A
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
2006
INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
Pursuant
to Section 12 of the FalconStor Software, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), the Plan shall be amended effective May 8, 2008, to read as
follows:
1. Section
1 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following sentence at the
conclusion of the first paragraph:
“The Plan
includes the subplan for certain French resident individuals, designated
hereunder as Appendix A.”
2. Section
1 of the Plan shall be further amended by adding the following paragraph after
the second paragraph thereof:
“It is
further intended that the restricted stock units described in Appendix A receive
the favorable tax and social security treatment for free shares under the French
Commercial Code.”
3. The
first paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the second
sentence thereof in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following:
“The
Committee, subject to Sections 3, 5, 6 and Appendix A hereof, shall have full
power and authority to designate recipients of Options, restricted stock
(“Restricted Stock”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and to determine the
terms and conditions of the respective Option, Restricted Stock and RSU
agreements (which need not be identical) and to interpret the provisions and
supervise the administration of the Plan.”
4. The
second paragraph of Section 2 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the words
“or RSUs” after “Restricted Stock” each time the latter term appears
therein.
5. Section
3 of the Plan shall be amended by deleting the first sentence hereof and
substituting therefor the following:
“The
persons eligible for participation in the Plan as recipient of Options (the
“Optionees”) or Restricted Stock or RSUs (the “Grantees” and together with the
Optionees, the “Participants”) shall include directors, officers and employees
of the Company and consultants subject to their meeting the requirements of Rule
701 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), provided that (i) Incentive Options may only be granted to employees of
the Company and any Subsidiary; and (ii) any RSUs subject to Appendix A may be
granted only to employees and officers (within the meaning of French law) of the
Company and any Subsidiary (which is at least 10% held, in terms of share
capital or voting rights, by the Company).”
6. The
second sentence of Section 3 shall be amended by adding “or RSU” after
“Restricted Stock.”
7. The
third sentence of Section 3 shall be deleted in its entirety and the following
shall be substituted therefor:
“A
Participant who has been granted an Option or Restricted Stock or RSU hereunder
may be granted an additional Option or Options, Restricted Stock or RSU if the
Committee shall so determine.”
8. The
fourth and fifth sentences of Section 4 of the Plan shall be deleted in their
entirety and the following shall be substituted therefor:
“Any of
such shares of Stock that may remain unissued and that are not subject to
outstanding Options or RSUs at the termination of the Plan shall cease to be
reserved for the purposes of the Plan, but until termination of the Plan the
Company shall at all times reserve a sufficient number of shares of Stock to
meet the requirement of the Plan. Should any Option, Restricted Stock
or RSU expire or be cancelled prior to its exercise or vesting in full or should
the number of shares of Stock to be delivered upon the exercise or vesting in
full of an Option, Restricted Stock or RSU be reduced for any reason, the shares
of Stock thereof subject to such Option, Restricted Stock or RSU may be subject
to future Options, Restricted Stock or RSU under the Plan except where such
reissuance is inconsistent with the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Code
where qualification as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of
the Code is intended.”
9. Section
6 shall be recaptioned by adding the words “and Restricted Stock Units” at the
conclusion thereof and a Sub-Section captioned "6.1 Restricted Stock" shall be
added and shall include the existing content of Section 6, except as hereafter
set forth.
10. Section
6.1(a) of the Plan shall be amended by adding the words “or delivery by
electronic issuance” in the second sentence thereof.
11. Section
6.1(b) of the Plan shall be recaptioned “Issuance of Shares” and shall be
further amended by adding the words “either through delivery by electronic
issuance or by way of" after the words "Grantee’s name" and by removing the word
"for" after the word "certificates".
12. Section
6.1(c) of the Plan shall be recaptioned “Issuance of Shares” and shall be
further amended by adding the words “nor shall there be any delivery by
electronic issuance to the Grantee” at the end of the second line
thereof.
13. A
Sub-Section captioned "6.2 Restricted Stock Units" shall be included and shall
read as follows:
"6.2 Restricted
Stock Units
Restricted
Stock Units may be granted under this Plan aside from, or in association with,
any other award and shall be subject to the following conditions and, if
applicable, the conditions set forth in Appendix A, and shall contain such
additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan
(including if applicable Appendix A), as the Committee shall deem
desirable:
(a) Grantee
rights. A Grantee shall have no rights to an award of RSUs
unless and until Grantee accepts the award within the period prescribed by the
Committee. After acceptance of an award, the Grantee shall not have
the rights of a stockholder until the RSUs vest and the shares are issued or
transferred to the Grantee.
(b) Forfeitability and
Non-transferability of Restricted Stock Units. RSUs are
forfeitable until the terms of the RSU grants are satisfied. Subject
to Appendix A (if applicable), RSUs are not transferable, except to the extent,
if any, set forth in a RSU grant. However, the Committee in its sole discretion
may, except with respect to the RSUs granted pursuant to Appendix A, permit a
transfer pursuant to a domestic relations order.
(c) Issuance of
Certificates. The Company shall issue in the Grantee’s name
either through delivery if electronic issuance or by way of a certificate or
certificates the shares of Common Stock associated with the award promptly after
vesting of the RSUs.
(d) Delivery of
Certificates. Unless otherwise provided, any certificate or
certificates issued evidencing shares issued or transferred upon vesting of the
RSUs shall not be delivered to the Grantee nor shall there be any delivery of
shares by electronic issuance until such shares are free of any restrictions
specified by the Committee at the time of grant or, if the grant is made under
Appendix A, in accordance with Appendix A.
(e) Change of
Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control as defined
in Section 5(c), the Committee may accelerate the vesting of outstanding RSUs
and/or waive any applicable holding period of the shares issued or transferred
upon vesting of the RSUs, in whole or in part, as determined by the Committee,
in its sole discretion.
(f) Termination of
Employment. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee at or
after grant, in the event the Grantee ceases to be an employee or otherwise
associated with the Company for any other reason before full vesting of the
RSUs, all unvested RSUs theretofore awarded to him shall be
forfeited. The Committee may provide (on or after grant) that
forfeiture conditions relating to RSUs will be waived in whole or in part in the
event of termination resulting from specified causes, and the Committee may in
other cases waive in whole or in part forfeiture conditions relating to
RSUs."
14. Section
7 of the Plan shall be amended by adding “or RSUs” after “Restricted Stock” each
time the latter term appears thereunder.
15. Section
8 of the Plan shall be amended by adding “or RSUs (or shares issued or
transferred upon vesting of the RSUs)” after “Restricted Stock” in the last
sentence thereof.
16. Section
8 of the Plan shall be further amended by adding the words ", and in the case of
RSUs subject to Appendix A, only to the extent consistent with continued
qualification of the award for favorable tax and social security treatment in
France" at the conclusion of the second paragraph.
17. Section
9 of the Plan shall be amended by adding “or RSUs” after “Restricted Stock” each
time the latter term appears thereunder.
18. Section
10(a) of the Plan shall be amended by adding “or RSUs” after “Restricted
Stock.”
19. Section
12 of the Plan shall be amended by adding “or RSU” after “Restricted Stock” at
the end of the second line thereof.
20. The
second paragraph of Section 12 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and
the following shall be substituted therefor:
“Subject
to the foregoing, the Committee may amend the terms of any Option or RSU
theretofore granted, prospectively or retrospectively, but no such amendment
shall impair the rights of any Participant without the Participant’s
consent.”
21. Section
13 of the Plan shall be amended by adding “or RSUs” after “Restricted Stock”
each time the latter term appears thereunder.
22. Section
16 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the words “provided, however, that
notwithstanding the foregoing, Appendix A shall be interpreted in accordance
with French law.”
23. A
new Appendix A shall be added to read as follows:
“Qualifying
RSUs
The
Grantees must be either (1) employees of the Company or employees of a
Subsidiary (which is, directly or indirectly at least 10% held, in terms of
share capital or voting rights) of the Company; or (ii) officers (under French
law) of the Company or of a Subsidiary (which is, directly or indirectly at
least 10% held, in terms of share capital or voting rights) of the Company,
including, without limitation, the president of a société par actions simplifiée
(“SAS”).
A Grantee
cannot own more than 10 percent of the share capital of the Company, nor can
RSUs be granted if it would result in a Grantee owning more than 10 percent of
the share capital of the Company. The total number of RSUs granted
cannot exceed 10 percent of the share capital of the Company. For
purposes of the preceding sentence, RSUs that do not vest are
disregarded.
While the
agreement evidencing the award of an RSU will set forth the vesting schedule,
except in the case of death or total and permanent disability (corresponding to
the second and third categories provided for under article L.341-4 of the French
social security code) of the Grantee, the minimum vesting period is two years
from the date of grant of the RSUs.
|
4.
|
Non-transferability of
Restricted Stock Units
|
RSUs are
not transferable, save in case of death of the Grantee. In case of
death of the Grantee, his heirs may request, during the six months following
Grantee's death, that the shares subject to the RSUs be transferred to
them.
Stock
transferred to a Grantee upon vesting of RSUs may either be newly issued Stock
or reacquired Stock, provided, however, that if an award is to be settled in
reacquired Stock, the Company must reacquire such Stock prior to the Grantee’s
vesting in his RSUs.
Upon the
vesting of RSUs, grantees will receive the Shares for either no consideration or
nominal consideration.
|
a)
|
An
officer must hold his shares of Stock while he continues to serve as an
officer.
|
|
b)
|
Additionally,
while the holding period for all grants will be set forth in a grant
agreement, the minimum holding period of the shares issued or transferred
upon vesting of RSUs shall be two years after full vesting, except in case
of death or total and permanent disability (corresponding to the second
and third categories provided for under article L.341-4 of the French
social security code) of the
Grantee.
|
|
c)
|
The
Committee is authorized to define appropriate mechanisms to ensure that
vested shares cannot be sold or otherwise disposed of within this two-year
period.
|
|
8.
|
Limits on
Transferability
|
After
expiry of the holding period, Shares can not be sold during the following
windows (i) within the 10 market days both preceding and following the date on
which the consolidated accounts of the Company are made public and (ii) during
the period elapsing between the date on which the corporate bodies of the
Company are made aware of information which, if made public, could have a
significant impact on the market price of the shares, and the date which is 10
market days after the date on which such information is made
public.
The Plan,
this Appendix A and any award under Appendix A may be amended from time to time
(without, in the case of an award, the consent of the Grantee) as may be
necessary or appropriate to qualify the award for favorable tax and social
security treatment under French law."
24. As
hereby amended, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
EXHIBIT
B
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
2007
OUTSIDE DIRECTORS EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
Section
5(a)(ii) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced as
follows:
“RESERVED”
Section
6(a)(i) of the Plan is amended by deleting the words “Five Thousand (5,000)” and
replacing them with the words “Ten Thousand (10,000)”.
EXHIBIT
C
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE CHARTER
Purpose
The Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors is appointed by the Board to assist the
Board in monitoring (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the
Company, (2) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, (3) the
performance of the Company’s internal audit function and independent auditors,
(4) the integrity of management and information systems and internal controls,
and (5) the compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory
requirements.
The Audit
Committee shall prepare the report required by the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to be included in the Company’s annual
proxy statement.
Committee
Membership
The Audit
Committee shall consist of no fewer than three members. The members of the Audit
Committee shall meet the independence and experience requirements of the NASDAQ,
Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and the rules and regulations of the Commission. At least one member of the
Audit Committee shall be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the
Commission. Audit Committee members shall not simultaneously serve on the audit
committees of more than two other public companies. The members of the Audit
Committee shall be appointed by the Board. Audit Committee members may be
replaced by the Board.
Meetings
The Audit
Committee shall meet as often as it determines, but not less frequently than
quarterly. The Audit Committee shall meet periodically with management and the
independent auditor in separate executive sessions. The Audit Committee may
request any officer or employee of the Company or the Company’s outside counsel
or independent auditor to attend a meeting of the Committee or to meet with any
members of, or consultants to, the Committee.
Committee
Authority and Responsibilities
The Audit
Committee shall have the sole authority to appoint or replace the independent
auditor (subject, if applicable, to shareholder ratification). The Audit
Committee shall be directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of
the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements
between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting)
for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work. The
independent auditor shall report directly to the Audit Committee.
The Audit
Committee shall preapprove all auditing services and permitted non-audit
services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for the Company
by its independent auditor, subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit
services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act which are
approved by the Audit Committee prior to the completion of the audit. The Audit
Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or
more members when appropriate, including the authority to grant preapprovals of
audit and permitted non-audit services, provided that decisions of such
subcommittee to grant preapprovals shall be presented to the full Audit
Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
The Audit
Committee shall review and pre-approve all related-party
transactions.
The Audit
Committee shall establish procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment
of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting
controls or auditing matters. The Audit Committee shall ensure that such
complaints are treated confidentially and anonymously.
The Audit
Committee shall have the authority, to the extent it deems necessary or
appropriate, to retain independent legal, accounting or other advisors. The
Company shall provide for appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit
Committee, for payment of compensation to the independent auditor for the
purpose of rendering or issuing an audit report and to any advisors employed by
the Audit Committee.
The Audit
Committee shall make regular reports to the Board. The Audit Committee shall
review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter annually and recommend any
proposed changes to the Board for approval. The Audit Committee shall annually
review the Audit Committee’s own performance.
The Audit
Committee, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, shall:
Financial Statement and
Disclosure Matters
|
1.
|
Review
and discuss with management and the independent auditor the annual audited
financial statements, including disclosures made in management’s
discussion and analysis, and recommend to the Board whether the audited
financial statements should be included in the Company’s Form 10-K. This
includes reviewing management’s and the independent auditor’s judgment
about the quality, not just the acceptability, of accounting principles,
the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of the
disclosures in the financial
statements.
|
|
2.
|
Review
and discuss with management and the independent auditor the Company’s
quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of its Form 10-Q,
including the results of the independent auditor’s review of the quarterly
financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Discuss
with management and the independent auditor significant financial
reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of
the Company’s financial statements, including any significant changes in
the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles, any major
issues as to the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and any
special steps adopted in light of material control
deficiencies.
|
|
4.
|
Review
and discuss quarterly reports from the independent auditors
on:
|
|
a.
|
All
critical accounting policies and practices to be
used.
|
|
b.
|
All
alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted
accounting principles that have been discussed with management,
ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments,
and the treatment preferred by the independent
auditor.
|
|
c.
|
Other
material written communications between the independent auditor and
management, such as any management letter or schedule of unadjusted
differences.
|
|
5.
|
Discuss
with management the Company’s earnings press releases, including the use
of “pro forma” or “adjusted” non-GAAP information, as well as financial
information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating
agencies. Such discussion may be done generally (consisting of discussing
the types of information to be disclosed and the types of presentations to
be made).
|
|
6.
|
Discuss
with management and the independent auditor the effect of regulatory and
accounting initiatives as well as off-balance sheet structures, if any, on
the Company’s financial statements.
|
|
7.
|
Discuss
with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps
management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the
Company’s risk assessment and risk management
policies
|
|
8.
|
Discuss
with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 relating to the conduct of the
audit, including any difficulties encountered in the course of the audit
work, any restrictions on the scope of activities or access to requested
information, and any significant disagreements with
management.
|
|
9.
|
Review
disclosures made to the Audit Committee by the Company’s CEO and CFO
during their certification process for the Form 10-K and Form 10-Q about
any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls or material weaknesses therein and any fraud involving management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal
controls.
|
Oversight of the Company’s
Relationship with the Independent Auditor
|
1.
|
Review
and evaluate the lead partner of the independent auditor
team.
|
|
2.
|
Obtain
and review a report from the independent auditor at least annually
regarding (a) the independent auditor’s internal quality-control
procedures, (b) any material issues raised by the most recent internal
quality-control review, or peer review, of the firm, or by any inquiry or
investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the
preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out
by the firm, (c) any steps taken to deal with any such issues, and (d) all
relationships between the independent auditor and the Company. Evaluate
the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent
auditor, including considering whether the auditor’s quality controls are
adequate and the provision of permitted non-audit services is compatible
with maintaining the auditor’s independence, taking into account the
opinions of management and internal auditors. The Audit Committee shall
present its conclusions with respect to the independent auditor to the
Board.
|
|
3.
|
Ensure
the rotation of the audit partners as required by law. Consider whether,
in order to assure continuing auditor independence, it is appropriate to
adopt a policy of rotating the independent auditing firm on a regular
basis.
|
|
4.
|
Recommend
to the Board policies for the Company’s hiring of employees or former
employees of the independent auditor who participated in any capacity in
the audit of the Company.
|
|
5.
|
Discuss
with the national office of the independent auditor issues on which they
were consulted by the Company’s audit team and matters of audit quality
and consistency.
|
|
6.
|
Meet
with the independent auditor prior to the audit to discuss the planning
and staffing of the audit.
|
Compliance Oversight
Responsibilities
|
1.
|
Obtain
from the independent auditor assurance that Section 10A(b) of the Exchange
Act has not been implicated.
|
|
2.
|
Obtain
reports from management and the Company’s senior internal auditing
executive that the Company and its subsidiary/foreign affiliated entities
are in conformity with applicable legal requirements and the Company’s
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Review reports and disclosures of
insider and affiliated party transactions. Advise the Board with respect
to the Company’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with
applicable laws and regulations and with the Company’s Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics.
|
|
3.
|
Establish
procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received
by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees
of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing
matters.
|
|
4.
|
Discuss
with management and the independent auditor any correspondence with
regulators or governmental agencies and any published reports which raise
material issues regarding the Company’s financial statements or accounting
policies.
|
|
5.
|
Discuss
with the Company’s General Counsel legal matters that may have a material
impact on the financial statements or the Company’s compliance
policies.
|
Limitation of Audit Committee’s
Role
While the
Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter,
it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to
determine that the Company’s financial statements and disclosures are complete
and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and applicable rules and regulations. These are the responsibilities of
management and the independent auditor.
PROXY
FALCONSTOR
SOFTWARE, INC.
Proxy for
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Solicited
by the Board of Directors
The
undersigned hereby appoints ReiJane Huai and James Weber, and each of them, with
full power of substitution to represent the undersigned and to vote all of the
shares of common stock of FalconStor Software, Inc. (“FalconStor”) which the
undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
FalconStor to be held at FalconStor Software, Inc., 2 Huntington Quadrangle,
Suite 2S01, Melville, New York, on Thursday, May 8, 2008, at 9:00 a.m., local
time, and at any adjournment thereof, (1) as hereinafter specified upon the
proposals listed below and (2) in their discretion, upon such other matters as
may properly come before the meeting.
IMPORTANT: PLEASE DATE, SIGN
AND MAIL PROMPTLY THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE TO ASSURE THAT YOUR
SHARES ARE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING. If you attend the meeting, you
may vote in person should you wish to do so even though you have already sent in
your Proxy.
1.
|
To
elect the following directors: (01) Steven Fischer and (02) Alan Kaufman,
to serve as directors until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the
Company and until successors have been duly elected and
qualified.
|
01 – Steven R. Fischer
FOR
___________ WITHHOLD ___________
02 – Alan W. Kaufman
FOR
___________ WITHHOLD ___________
2.
|
To
approve an amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2006 Incentive
Stock Plan.
|
FOR
___________
|
AGAINST ___________
|
ABSTAIN
___________
|
3.
|
To
approve an amendment to the FalconStor Software, Inc., 2007 Outside
Director Equity Compensation Plan.
|
FOR
___________
|
AGAINST ___________
|
ABSTAIN
___________
|
4.
|
To
ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2008.
|
FOR
___________
|
AGAINST ___________
|
ABSTAIN
___________
|
5.
|
With
discretionary authority, upon such other matters as may properly come
before the meeting. At this time, the persons making this
solicitation know of no other matters to be presented at the
meeting.
|
MARK THIS
BOX WITH AN X IF YOU HAVE MADE CHANGES TO YOUR NAME OR ADDRESS DETAILS
ABOVE _____
MARK THIS
BOX WITH AN X IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING ____
Please
sign your name exactly as it appears on the stock certificate representing your
shares. If signing for estates, trusts or corporations, title or capacity should
be stated. If shares are held jointly, both should sign.
Signature:
__________________ Date______________
Signature:
__________________ Date______________