As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2006

===============================================================================

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  SCHEDULE 14A

                Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

Filed by Registrant   |x|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  | |

Check the appropriate box:
| |     Preliminary Proxy Statement
| |     CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE
        14A-6(E)(2))
| |     Definitive Proxy Statement
|x|     Definitive Additional Materials
| |     Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-12

                              PUBLIC STORAGE, INC.
               (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

               =================================================
    (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|x|     No fee required
| |     Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
        (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

            =================================================================
        (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

            =================================================================
        (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
            computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11(set forth the amount on
            which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

            =================================================================
        (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

            =================================================================
        (5) Total fee paid:

            =================================================================
| |      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
| |      Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
         Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
         was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
         statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
         (1) Amount Previously Paid:

             =================================================================
         (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

             =================================================================
         (3) Filing Party:

             =================================================================
         (4) Date Filed:

            =================================================================
PERSONS WHO ARE TO RESPOND TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
FORM ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RESPOND UNLESS THE FORM DISPLAYS A CURRENTLY VALID OMB
CONTROL NUMBER.

===============================================================================




                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

     On August 8, 2006, Shurgard Storage Centers,  Inc. and Public Storage, Inc.
entered into a Memorandum of Understanding  related to a litigation  settlement,
subject to court and other approvals,  of an action pending in Superior Court of
Washington,  County of King at Seattle captioned Doris Staer v. Shurgard Storage
Centers, Inc., et al. The suit was filed as a putative class action on behalf of
holders of Shurgard common stock against  Shurgard and certain of the members of
its Board of Directors related to the proposed merger between Public Storage and
Shurgard.  Pursuant to the  Memorandum  of  Understanding,  Shurgard  and Public
Storage agreed to disclose  certain  additional  information.  This  information
should be read carefully together with the joint proxy statement/prospectus that
Public  Storage and Shurgard  have  previously  filed with the SEC and mailed to
their respective shareholders in connection with the proposed merger.

                             SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE

         In the process of evaluating the strategic alternatives available to
Shurgard, the Shurgard board of directors considered selling Shurgard's European
operations separately. However, after conducting an auction process that sought
bids for both Shurgard's European operations and U.S. operations separately, as
well as for the entire company, the Shurgard board determined that a transaction
for the entire company in a single transaction would likely result in a higher
total value than selling the company in separate parts.

        In addition to the bid received from Public Storage, on January 12,
2006, Shurgard received five non-binding preliminary bids from third parties,
two of which were for the entire company and three of which were for only
Shurgard's European operations. The two preliminary bidders that submitted
a bid for the entire company proposed $51.00 and $49.49 (on an implied value
basis), respectively, for each outstanding share of Shurgard common stock,
representing approximately 12.9% and 15.4% less, respectively, than the proposed
price reflected in Public Storage's preliminary bid for the entire company
(based on the closing price of Public Storage common stock on January 12, 2006).
The three preliminary bidders that expressed an interest in acquiring only
Shurgard's European operations proposed a purchase price for those operations of
1.05 billion euros, 1 billion euros and 868 million euros, respectively, or
$1.26 billion, $1.20 billion and $1.04 billion, respectively, based on currency
prices at the close of trading in New York on January 12, 2006.

         At a meeting of Shurgard's independent directors on March 5, 2006, the
independent directors noted that the combined value of the highest offer
submitted in the bidding process for Shurgard's European operations and the
highest offer for Shurgard's U.S. operations was less than the implied value of
Public Storage's offer for the entire company. Accordingly, the independent
directors determined that, pending resolution of negotiations with Public
Storage for a sale of the entire company, Shurgard should take no further action
with respect to the revised bid for Shurgard's European operations from the only
other remaining bidder in the process at the time, the acquisition group that
included Charles K. Barbo, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Shurgard, and
David K. Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer of Shurgard.

         On January 17, 2006, the Shurgard board of directors approved certain
technical amendments to Shurgard's business combination agreements with senior
management. The amendments to the business combination agreements were intended
(i) to clarify the terms for inclusion of bonus in severance amounts to ensure
that a buyer could not reduce bonuses to $0 after a sale and thereby
dramatically reduce the amount of severance owed, (ii) to clarify that the
business combination agreements would terminate if an executive were to quit
other than for "Good Reason" or be fired for "Cause" prior to a business
combination, (iii) to clarify that the business combination agreements would
terminate on a leave of absence unless otherwise agreed to in writing by
Shurgard, and (iv) to add a provision requiring Shurgard (or its successor) to
pay for the executive's legal fees in the event of a dispute under the business
combination agreement, unless the executive's claim was found to be frivolous or
brought in bad faith. Shurgard believes that the changes to the business
combination agreements do not affect the amount of severance payable (except
potentially for the clarification of the treatment of bonus described in clause
(i) above), the types of transactions that would trigger severance payments or
the duration of the period after a business combination during which severance
payments would be triggered.

        Since January 1, 2004, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of Shurgard's
financial advisors, and affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. received
from Public Storage aggregate fees for corporate and investment banking services
unrelated to the merger of approximately $10 million.


                                       2


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND WHERE TO FIND IT


         This filing does constitute an offer of any securities for sale. In
connection with the proposed transaction, Public Storage and Shurgard have filed
a definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus dated July 24, 2006 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as part a registration statement regarding
the proposed merger of Public Storage and Shurgard. INVESTORS AND SECURITY
HOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND
OTHER RELEVANT MATERIAL BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PUBLIC
STORAGE AND SHURGARD AND THE PROPOSED MERGER. Investors and security holders may
obtain a free copy of the definitive proxy statement/prospectus and other
documents filed by Public Storage and Shurgard with the SEC at the SEC's website
at www.sec.gov. Each company has scheduled an annual shareholders' meeting to be
held on August 22, 2006, to, among other things, vote on approval of the merger.
The definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant documents may
also be obtained free of charge from Public Storage or Shurgard by directing
such request to: Public Storage, Inc. 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, CA
91201-2349, Attention: Investor Relations or Shurgard Storage Centers, Inc.,
1155 Valley Street, Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98109-4426, Attention: Investor
Relations.

         This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any
securities, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in
which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration
or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offering
of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the
requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933.