Edgar Filing: CASCADE BANCORP

CACB-2014.06.30-10Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)



X	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2014



	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to_________

Commission file number: 000-23322

CASCADE BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Oregon	93-1034484
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1100 N.W. Wall Street

Bend, Oregon 97701

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(877) 617-3400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

¨ Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer x Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 72,222,925 shares of no par value Common Stock as of August 11, 2014.

CASCADE BANCORP & SUBSIDIARY

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT

June 30, 2014



	INDEX
		Page
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:	3
	June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:	4
	Three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income:	5
	Three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:	6
	Six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	38

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.	50

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	50

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	51

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	51

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	52

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	52

Item 5	Other Information	52

Item 6.	Exhibits	52

SIGNATURES		53

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)



	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	53,775		$	33,300
Interest bearing deposits	110,475			48,527
Federal funds sold	22			22
Total cash and cash equivalents	164,272			81,849
Investment securities available-for-sale	276,096			194,481
Investment securities held-to-maturity, estimated fair value of $155,435 ($1,342 at 2013)	154,717			1,320
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock	26,178			9,913
Loans held for sale	4,944			10,359
Loans, net	1,372,909			973,618
Premises and equipment, net	44,378			32,953
Bank-owned life insurance (BOLI)	52,895			36,567
Other real estate owned (OREO), net	5,724			3,144
Deferred tax asset (DTA), net	69,994			50,068
Core deposit intangible (CDI)	8,092			529
Goodwill	75,838			—
Other assets	32,336			11,418
Total assets	$	2,288,373		$	1,406,219
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand	$	638,923		$	431,079
Interest bearing demand	908,683			544,668
Savings	133,006			50,258
Time	261,423			141,315
Total deposits	1,942,035			1,167,320
FHLB borrowings	—			27,000
Other liabilities	39,442			23,184
Total liabilities	1,981,477			1,217,504

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	—			—
Common stock, no par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 72,223,519 issued and outstanding (47,592,061 in 2013)	450,615			330,839
Accumulated deficit	(145,823		)	(142,088		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	2,104			(36		)
Total stockholders' equity	306,896			188,715
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	2,288,373		$	1,406,219

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	14,147		$	10,933		$	24,896		$	22,171
Interest on investments	2,020			1,381			3,348			2,703
Other interest income	45			66			72			103
Total interest income	16,212			12,380			28,316			24,977

Interest expense:
Deposits:
Interest bearing demand	217			182			392			348
Savings	7			6			11			11
Time	319			261			502			594
Other borrowings	1			460			6			934
Total interest expense	544			909			911			1,887

Net interest income	15,668			11,471			27,405			23,090
Loan loss provision	—			1,000			—			1,000
Net interest income after loan loss provision	15,668			10,471			27,405			22,090

Non-interest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts	1,114			744			1,867			1,479
Card issuer and merchant services fees, net	1,595			875			2,596			1,626
Earnings on BOLI	249			224			432			435
Mortgage banking income, net	622			1,060			1,056			2,220
Swap fee income	617			—			943			—
Other income	617			613			1,272			1,112
Total non-interest income	4,814			3,516			8,166			6,872

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	13,746			8,960			21,389			16,607
Occupancy	4,851			1,573			5,991			2,728
Information Technology	1,815			658			2,602			1,234
Equipment	629			367			966			735
Communications	562			395			945			761
FDIC insurance	454			404			686			849
OREO (income) expense	710			(2		)	702			275
Professional services	3,851			829			5,183			1,510
Prepayment penalties on FHLB advances	—			3,827			—			3,827
Other expenses	3,607			2,298			5,611			4,094
Total non-interest expense	30,225			19,309			44,075			32,620

Loss before income taxes	(9,743		)	(5,322		)	(8,504		)	(3,658		)
Income tax benefit	5,065			51,746			4,769			51,778
Net (loss) income	$	(4,678	)	$	46,424		$	(3,735	)	$	48,120

Basic and diluted (loss) income per share:
Net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.08	)	$	0.98		$	(0.07	)	$	1.02
Net (loss) income per common share (diluted)	$	(0.08	)	$	0.98		$	(0.07	)	$	1.02

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net (loss) income	$	(4,678	)	$	46,424		$	(3,735	)	$	48,120

Other Comprehensive (loss) income:
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available-for-sale	2,715			(1,367		)	3,450			(2,252		)
Tax effect of the unrealized gain on investment securities available-for-sale	(1,032		)	519			(1,311		)	856
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,683		$	(848	)	$	2,139		$	(1,396	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(2,995	)	$	45,576		$	(1,596	)	$	46,724

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

(Dollars in thousands)

(unaudited)



	Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(6,825	)	$	(4,370	)

Investing activities:
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale	(6,466		)	(8		)
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and prepayments of investment securities available-for-sale	76,071			36,822
Proceeds from maturities, calls of investment securities held-to-maturity	656			447
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock	350			186
Loan originations, net	(6,947		)	(71,506		)
Proceeds from purchases of premises and equipment, net	(316		)	(1,061		)
Proceeds from sales of OREO	291			4,880
Net cash received from acquisition of Home	38,620			—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	102,259			(30,240		)

Financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	14,067			28,018
Tax effect of non-vested restricted stock	(78		)	(72		)
FHLB advance borrowings	60,000			50,000
Repayment of FHLB advances	(87,000		)	(60,000		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(13,011		)	17,946
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	82,423			(16,664		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	81,849			113,028
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	164,272		$	96,364

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	3,340		$	2,118
Loans transferred to OREO	$	—		$	1,098

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cascade Bancorp (“Bancorp”), an Oregon chartered single bank holding company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bank of the Cascades (the “Bank”) (collectively, the “Company” or “Cascade”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, certain financial information and footnotes have been omitted or condensed. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (all of which are of a normal and recurring nature) necessary for the fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. In preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the balance sheets and income and expenses for the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.

The condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 were derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but do not include all disclosures contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 2013 consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

As discussed in Note 2 - Business Combinations, on May 16, 2014 (the "Acquisition Date"), the Company completed the merger with Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. ("Home").

Certain amounts in 2013 have been reclassified to conform to the 2014 presentation; however the reclassifications do not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

2. Business Combinations

On the Acquisition Date, pursuant to the previously announced Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 23, 2013 (the "Merger Agreement"), between the Company and Home, Home merged with and into Cascade with Cascade continuing as the surviving corporation (the "Merger"). Immediately after the Merger, Home Federal Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Home, merged with and into Bank of the Cascades, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cascade, with Bank of the Cascades continuing as the surviving bank. The results of Home's operations are included in the Company's financial results beginning on the Acquisition Date.

All of Home’s common stock was converted into the right to receive $8.43 in cash and 1.6772 shares of Cascade common stock. The conversion of Home’s common stock into Cascades common stock resulted in Cascade issuing 24,309,131 shares of its common stock.

The Merger was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at estimated fair value on the Acquisition Date. Preliminary goodwill of $75.8 million was calculated as the purchase premium after adjusting for the fair value of net assets acquired and represents the value expected from the synergies created from combining the two banking organizations as well as the economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the two companies. None of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes as the Merger is accounted for as a tax-free exchange.

In most instances, determining the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities required us to estimate cash flows expected to result from those assets and liabilities and to discount those cash flows at appropriate rates of interest. The most significant of those determinations relates to the valuation of acquired loans. For such loans, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is recognized as interest income over the remaining lives of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition reflects the impact of estimated credit losses and other factors, such as prepayments. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no carry-over of Home’s previously established reserve for loan losses.

The following table provides a summary of the purchase price calculation as of the Acquisition Date and the identifiable assets purchased and the liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values. These fair value measurements are provisional based on third-party valuations that are currently under review and are subject to refinement for up to one year after the Acquisition Date based on additional information that may be obtained by us that existed as of the Acquisition Date.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



Purchase Price (in thousands, except per share data)
Cascade Bancorp common stock shares issued for Home Federal shares			24,309,131
Cascade share price as calculated in the Merger Agreement			$	4.91
Consideration from common stock conversion (1.6772 ratio)			$	119,285
Consideration paid in cash ($8.43 per share)			$	122,163
Total purchase price			241,448
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	160,782
Investment securities	318,893
Loans	392,344
Premises and equipment	18,610
Other real estate owned	3,514
Deferred tax asset	15,168
Bank owned life insurance	15,896
Other assets	13,259
Intangible asset acquired (1)	7,667
Total assets	$	946,133
LIABILITIES
Deposits	$	760,648
Other liabilities	19,875
Total liabilities	$	780,523
Net identifiable assets acquired			165,610
Goodwill			$	75,838

(1) Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles. The useful life for which the core deposit intangible is being amortized is 10 years.

Merger related charges of $9.9 million and $10.8 million were recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. Such expenses were for severance, branch consolidation costs, contract termination, disposal of excess equipment and professional and legal services rendered in connection with the acquisition.

The following table provides the unaudited pro forma information for the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1 of each year. These adjustments reflect the impact of certain purchase accounting fair value measurements, primarily comprised of Home’s loan, investment and deposit portfolios. In addition, the $9.9 million and $10.8 million in merger-related expenses noted earlier are included in each period presented. These unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined banking organization that would have been achieved had the Merger occurred at the beginning of each period presented, nor are they intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations.



	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013		2014			2013
Net interest income	$	19,907		$	22,646	$	41,586		$	44,641
Non-interest expense	45,603			35,445		68,727			59,029
Net income	$	(15,775	)	$	41,479	$	(14,206	)	$	43,777
Net income per diluted share	$	(0.22	)	$	0.58	$	(0.20	)	$	0.61

3. Investment Securities

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Investment securities at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):



	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses			Estimated fair value
June 30, 2014
Available-for-sale
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) *	$	244,996	$	3,870	$	(1,782	)	$	247,084
Non-agency MBS	12,309		64		(287		)	12,086
U.S. Agency asset-backed securities	8,424		863		(42		)	9,245
Corporate securities	6,466		696		—			7,162
Mutual fund	508		11		—			519
	$	272,703	$	5,504	$	(2,111	)	$	276,096
Held-to-maturity
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)	$	111,893	$	616	$	(21	)	$	112,488
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	42,239		189		(66		)	42,362
Tax credit investments	585		—		—			585
	$	154,717	$	805	$	(87	)	$	155,435

December 31, 2013
Available-for-sale
U.S. Agency MBS *	$	171,853	$	3,125	$	(3,646	)	$	171,332
Non-agency MBS	13,500		11		(414		)	13,097
U.S. Agency asset-backed securities	8,683		887		(21		)	9,549
Mutual fund	502		1		—			503
	$	194,538	$	4,024	$	(4,081	)	$	194,481
Held-to-maturity
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	$	706	$	22	$	—		$	728
Tax credit investments	614		—		—			614
	$	1,320	$	22	$	—		$	1,342

* U.S. Agency MBS include private label MBS of approximately $10.4 million and $11.3 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, which are supported by FHA/VA collateral.

The following table presents the contractual maturities of investment securities at June 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):



	Available-for-sale				Held-to-maturity
	Amortized cost		Estimated fair value		Amortized cost		Estimated fair value
Due in one year or less	$	3,238	$	3,240	$	184	$	187
Due after one year through five years	5,245		5,258		10,536		10,542
Due after five years through ten years	76,423		75,050		112,082		112,683
Due after ten years	187,289		192,029		31,330		31,438
Mutual fund	508		519		—		—
Tax credit investments	—		—		585		585
	$	272,703	$	276,096	$	154,717	$	155,435

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

The following table presents the fair value and gross unrealized losses of the Bank’s investment securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
	Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses			Estimated fair value		Unrealized losses
June 30, 2014
Available-for-sale
U.S. Agency MBS	$	9,217	$	(13	)	$	45,895	$	(1,769	)	$	55,112	$	(1,782	)
Non-Agency MBS	1,222		(87		)	5,639		(200		)	6,861		(287		)
U.S. Agency asset-backed securities	760		(2		)	1,644		(40		)	2,404		(42		)
	$	11,199	$	(102	)	$	53,178	$	(2,009	)	$	64,377	$	(2,111	)

Held-to-maturity
U.S. Agency MBS	$	15,384	$	(21	)	—		—			$	15,384	$	(21	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	12,620		(66		)	—		—			12,620		(66		)
	$	28,004	$	(87	)	$	—	$	—		$	28,004	$	(87	)

December 31, 2013
U.S. Agency MBS	$	35,440	$	(810	)	$	30,779	$	(2,836	)	$	66,219	$	(3,646	)
Non-Agency MBS	9,569		(412		)	179		(2		)	9,748		(414		)
U.S. Agency asset-backed securities	703		(4		)	1,775		(17		)	2,478		(21		)
	$	45,712	$	(1,226	)	$	32,733	$	(2,855	)	$	78,445	$	(4,081	)

The unrealized losses on investments in U.S. Agency and non-agency MBS and U.S Agency asset-backed securities are primarily due to changes in market yield/rate spreads at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 as compared to yield/rate spread relationships prevailing at the time specific investment securities were purchased. Management expects the fair value of these investment securities to recover as securities approach their maturity dates. Management does not believe that the above gross unrealized losses on investment securities are other-than-temporary. Accordingly, no impairment adjustments have been recorded.

Management intends to hold the investment securities classified as held-to-maturity until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full amortized cost value for such investment securities. Furthermore, as of June 30, 2014, management did not have the intent to sell any of the securities classified as held-to-maturity in the table above and believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of cost.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

4. Loans and reserve for credit losses

The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was as follows (dollars in thousands):



	June 30, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount			Percent		Amount			Percent
Originated loans (a):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	190,712		18.8	%	$	204,998		20.6	%
Non-owner occupied	365,827			36.0	%	347,014			34.8	%
Total commercial real estate loans	556,539			54.8	%	552,012			55.4	%
Construction	54,320			5.3	%	52,503			5.3	%
Residential real estate	101,975			10.0	%	101,557			10.2	%
Commercial and industrial	269,019			26.5	%	254,170			25.5	%
Consumer	34,805			3.4	%	35,990			3.6	%
Total loans	1,016,658			100.0	%	996,232			100.0	%

Less:
Deferred loan fees	(1,548		)			(1,757		)
Reserve for loan losses	(20,471		)			(20,857		)
Loans, net	$	994,639				$	973,618

Acquired loans (b):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	52,267		16.2	%
Non-owner occupied	110,650			34.1	%
Total commercial real estate loans	162,917			50.3	%
Construction	48,127			14.8	%
Residential real estate	83,776			25.8	%
Commercial and industrial	27,093			8.3	%
Consumer	2,757			0.8	%
Total loans	324,670			100.0	%

Less:
Reserve for loan losses	—
Loans, net	$	324,670

Acquired covered loans (c):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	13,083		24.4	%
Non-owner occupied	19,644			36.7	%
Total commercial real estate loans	32,727			61.1	%
Construction	2,564			4.8	%
Residential real estate	13,128			24.5	%
Commercial and industrial	4,621			8.6	%
Consumer	560			1.0	%
Total loans	53,600			100.0	%

Less:
Reserve for loan losses	—
Loans, net	$	53,600

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



Total loans:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	256,062		18.3	%
Non-owner occupied	496,121			35.6	%
Total commercial real estate loans	752,183			53.9	%
Construction	105,011			7.5	%
Residential real estate	198,879			14.3	%
Commercial and industrial	300,733			21.6	%
Consumer	38,122			2.7	%
Total loans	1,394,928			100.0	%

Less:
Deferred loan fees	(1,548		)
Reserve for loan losses	(20,471		)
Loans, net	$	1,372,909

(a) Originated loans are loans organically made through the Company's normal and customary origination process
(b) Acquired loans are loans acquired in the acquisition of Home, discussed elsewhere in this report, less acquired covered loans
(c) Acquired covered loans acquired in the acquisition of Home that are covered under FDIC loss share agreements

The following describes the distinction between originated, acquired and covered loan portfolios and certain significant accounting policies relevant to each of these portfolios.

Originated loans

Loans originated for investment are stated at their principal amount outstanding adjusted for partial charge-offs, the reserve for loan losses and net deferred loan fees and costs. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loans. Interest is not accrued on loans where collectability is uncertain. Accrued interest on loans is presented in "Other assets" on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Loan origination fees and certain direct costs incurred to extend credit are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan yield.

Approximately 70.1% of the Bank’s originated loan portfolio at June 30, 2014 consisted of real estate-related loans including construction and development loans, residential mortgage loans, and commercial loans were secured by commercial real estate. At June 30, 2014, approximately 75.7% of the Bank's total portfolio (inclusive of acquired and acquired covered loans) consisted of real estate-related loans as described above. The Bank's results of operations and financial condition are affected by general economic trends and in particular, the strength of the local residential and commercial real estate markets in Central, Southern and Northwest Oregon and the greater Boise/Treasure Valley, Idaho area. Real estate values could be affected by, among other things, a worsening of national and local economic conditions, an increase in foreclosures, a decline in home sale volumes, and an increase in interest rates. Furthermore, the Bank may experience an increase in the number of borrowers who become delinquent, file for protection under bankruptcy laws, or default on their loans or other obligations to the Bank in the event of a sustained downturn in business and economic conditions generally or specifically in the principal markets in which the Bank does business. An increase in the number of delinquencies, bankruptcies, or defaults could result in a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge-offs, and loan loss provision. Management is targeting to reduce commercial real estate ("CRE") concentration over the long term, but real estate-related loans will remain a significant portfolio component due to the nature of the economies, businesses, and markets we serve.

In the normal course of business, the Bank may participate portions of loans to third parties in order to extend the Bank’s lending capability or to mitigate risk. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the portion of loans participated to third-parties (which are not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements) totaled $29.9 million and $11.3 million, respectively.

Acquired loans

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Acquired loans are those purchased in the Home acquisition (See Note 2 - "Business Combinations" for further information). These loans were recorded at estimated fair value at the Acquisition Date. The fair value estimates for acquired and acquired covered loans is based on expected prepayments, charge offs and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows. The net fair value adjustment to the acquired and acquired covered loans was a reduction of $6.1 million, representing a valuation adjustment for interest rate and credit which will be accreted over the life of the loans (approximately 10 years).

Of the loans acquired on May 16, 2014, $17.7 million or 4.7% were graded substandard. Of that amount $8.3 million or 47.1% of the substandard loans were covered under a loss share agreement with the FDIC. With the amount of classified loans acquired being nominal, all loans acquired are treated in a manner consistent with originated loans for credit risk management and accounting purposes. See further discussion in "Acquired Covered Loans" below.

Acquired covered loans

As of June 30, 2014, $53.6 million or 14.2% of the $378.3 million in acquired and acquired covered loans were covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. The agreements were entered into in September 2009 and September 2010 between the FDIC and Home. The loss sharing agreements expire five years after the date of the FDIC agreements for non-single family covered assets and ten years after the acquisitions date for single-family covered assets. After the expiration of the loss sharing agreements, the Company will not be indemnified for losses and related expenses on covered assets. When the loss sharing agreements expire, the Company's and the Bank's risk-based capital ratios will be reduced. While the agreements are in place, the covered assets receive a 20% risk-weighting. When the agreements expire, the risk-weighting for previously covered assets will most likely increase to 100%, based on current regulatory capital definitions. Nearly all of the assets remaining in the covered asset portfolios are non-single family covered assets. Therefore, most of the covered assets will no longer be indemnified after September 2014 or September 2015. Only $8.3 million of the acquired covered loans were graded substandard. With the amount of classified loans covered under these agreements being nominal, amounts that may be due to or due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements will be accounted for on a cash basis.

A net loss share payable was recorded at the Acquisition Date which represents the estimated value of reimbursement the Company expects to pay to the FDIC for recoveries net of incurred losses on covered loans. These expected reimbursements are recorded as part of covered loans in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Upon the determination of an incurred loss or recovery the loss share receivable/payable will be changed by the amount due to or due from the FDIC.

Changes in the loss share payable associated with covered loans for the 45-day period from the Home acquisition to June 30, 2014 were as follows:



	45 Days Ended
	June 30, 2014
Balance at May 16, 2014	$	1,035
Charge-off receivable	(2		)
Recovery payable	250
Balance at end of period	$	1,283

Reserve for loan losses

The reserve for loan losses represents management’s estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio as of the condensed consolidated balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The reserve for loan losses is increased by charges to operating expense through the loan loss provision, and decreased by loans charged-off, net of recoveries. The reserve for loan losses requires complex subjective judgments as a result of the need to make estimates about matters that are uncertain. The reserve for loan losses is maintained at a level currently considered adequate to provide for potential loan losses based on management’s assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio.

However the reserve for loan losses is based on estimates and actual losses may vary from the current estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the periods in which they become

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

known. Therefore, management cannot provide assurance that, in any particular period, the Company will not have significant losses in relation to the amount reserved. The level of the reserve for loan losses is also determined after consideration of bank regulatory guidance and recommendations and is subject to review by such regulatory authorities who may require increases or decreases to the reserve based on their evaluation of the information available to them at the time of their examinations of the Bank.

For purposes of assessing the appropriate level of the reserve for loan losses, the Company analyzes loans and commitments to loan, and the amount of reserves allocated to loans and commitments to loan in each of the following reserve categories: pooled reserves, specifically identified reserves for impaired loans, and the unallocated reserve. Also, for purposes of analyzing loan portfolio credit quality and determining the appropriate level of reserve for loan losses, the Company identifies loan portfolio segments and classes based on the nature of the underlying loan collateral.

The decrease in the reserve for loan losses from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014 was related to charge-offs during the period. The unallocated reserve for loan losses at June 30, 2014 has increased $0.8 million from the balance at December 31, 2013. Management believes that the amount of unallocated reserve for loan losses is appropriate and will continue to evaluate the amount going forward.

Acquired reserve for loan losses

The fair value estimates for acquired and acquired covered loans is based on expected prepayments, charge offs, and the amount and timing of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows. The net fair value adjustment to the acquired and acquired covered loans was $6.1 million, representing a valuation adjustment for interest rate and credit quality. The fair value adjustment not accreted at any point in time represents the estimated reserve for loan losses for acquired loans. If the Company determines that this amount is insufficient a provision to the reserve for loan losses will be made.

Covered reserve for loan losses

The reserve for loan losses on covered loans is estimated similarly to acquired loans as described above except any increase to the reserve from a recovery or a decrease in the reserve from a charge-off is partially offset by an increase in the loss share payable (or receivable) for the portion of the losses recoverable and recoveries payable to the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. No allowance was estimated at quarter-end given management's judgment that purchase discounts adequately address the estimated losses in the acquired loans.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Transactions and allocations in the reserve for loan losses and unfunded loan commitments, by portfolio segment, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (dollars in thousands):



	Commercial real estate			Construction			Residential real estate			Commercial and industrial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Three months ended June 30, 2014
Reserve for loan losses
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	8,803		$	602		$	2,227		$	6,840		$	1,243		$	2,007		$	21,722
Loan loss provision (credit)	82			(163		)	(215		)	255			129			(88		)	—
Recoveries	60			289			157			546			67			—			1,119
Loans charged off	(985		)	—			(101		)	(1,026		)	(258		)	—			(2,370		)
Balance at end of period	$	7,960		$	728		$	2,068		$	6,615		$	1,181		$	1,919		$	20,471

Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—		$	440
Provision for unfunded loan commitments	—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—		$	440

Reserve for credit losses
Reserve for loan losses	$	7,960		$	728		$	2,068		$	6,615		$	1,181		$	1,919		$	20,471
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments	48			268			25			75			24			—			440
Total reserve for credit losses	$	8,008		$	996		$	2,093		$	6,690		$	1,205		$	1,919		$	20,911

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



	Commercial real estate			Construction			Residential real estate			Commercial and industrial			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
For the six months ended June 30, 2014
Reserve for loan losses
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	9,565		$	535		$	2,381		$	6,261		$	1,401		$	714	$	20,857
Loan loss provision (credit)	(1,478		)	115			(270		)	237			191			1,205		—
Recoveries	1,001			374			281			1,457			154			—		3,267
Loans charged off	(1,128		)	(296		)	(324		)	(1,340		)	(565		)	—		(3,653		)
Balance at end of period	$	7,960		$	728		$	2,068		$	6,615		$	1,181		$	1,919	$	20,471

Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—	$	440
Provision for unfunded loan commitments	—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Balance at end of period	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—	$	440

Reserve for credit losses
Reserve for loan losses	$	7,960		$	728		$	2,068		$	6,615		$	1,181		$	1,919	$	20,471
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments	48			268			25			75			24			—		440
Total reserve for credit losses	$	8,008		$	996		$	2,093		$	6,690		$	1,205		$	1,919	$	20,911



	Commercial real estate			Construction			Residential real estate			Commercial and industrial			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
Three months ended June 30, 2013
Reserve for loan losses
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	11,225		$	1,236		$	3,714		$	5,676		$	2,039		$	658	$	24,548
Loan loss provision (credit)	261			226			(570		)	887			(276		)	472		1,000
Recoveries	37			39			71			834			59			—		1,040
Loans charged off	(811		)	(659		)	(243		)	(2,049		)	(132		)	—		(3,894		)
Balance at end of period	$	10,712		$	842		$	2,972		$	5,348		$	1,690		$	1,130	$	22,694

Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—	$	440
Provision for unfunded loan commitments	—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Balance at end of period	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—	$	440

Reserve for credit losses
Reserve for loan losses	$	10,712		$	842		$	2,972		$	5,348		$	1,690		$	1,130	$	22,694
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments	48			268			25			75			24			—		440
Total reserve for credit losses	$	10,760		$	1,110		$	2,997		$	5,423		$	1,714		$	1,130	$	23,134

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



	Commercial real estate			Construction			Residential real estate			Commercial and industrial			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Reserve for loan losses
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	11,596		$	1,583		$	3,551		$	7,267		$	2,177		$	1,087	$	27,261
Loan loss provision (credit)	(19		)	542			(388		)	1,012			(190		)	43		1,000
Recoveries	215			163			188			1,346			118			—		2,030
Loans charged off	(1,080		)	(1,446		)	(379		)	(4,277		)	(415		)	—		(7,597		)
Balance at end of period	$	10,712		$	842		$	2,972		$	5,348		$	1,690		$	1,130	$	22,694

Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—	$	440
Provision for unfunded loan commitments	—			—			—			—			—			—		—
Balance at end of period	$	48		$	268		$	25		$	75		$	24		$	—	$	440

Reserve for credit losses
Reserve for loan losses	$	10,712		$	842		$	2,972		$	5,348		$	1,690		$	1,130	$	22,694
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments	48			268			25			75			24			—		440
Total reserve for credit losses	$	10,760		$	1,110		$	2,997		$	5,423		$	1,714		$	1,130	$	23,134

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

An individual loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes that it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The following table presents the reserve for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and impairment evaluation method at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Reserve for loan losses						Recorded investment in loans
	Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total		Individually evaluated for impairment		Collectively evaluated for impairment		Total
June 30, 2014
Commercial real estate	$	172	$	7,788	$	7,960	$	28,644	$	723,539	$	752,183
Construction	—		728		728		963		104,048		105,011
Residential real estate	—		2,067		2,067		461		198,418		198,879
Commercial and industrial	29		6,587		6,616		3,793		296,940		300,733
Consumer	—		1,181		1,181		—		38,122		38,122
	$	201	$	18,351	18,552		$	33,861	$	1,361,067	$	1,394,928
Unallocated					1,919
					$	20,471

December 31, 2013
Commercial real estate	$	665	$	8,900	$	9,565	$	32,227	$	519,785	$	552,012
Construction	—		535		535		1,987		50,516		52,503
Residential real estate	62		2,319		2,381		430		101,127		101,557
Commercial and industrial	56		6,205		6,261		5,823		248,347		254,170
Consumer	—		1,401		1,401		—		35,990		35,990
	$	783	$	19,360	20,143		$	40,467	$	955,765	$	996,232
Unallocated					714
					$	20,857

The above reserve for loan losses include an unallocated allowance of $1.9 million at June 30, 2014 and $0.7 million at December 31, 2013. The increased unallocated allowance at June 30, 2014 is considered by management to be reasonable and appropriate due to lack of seasoning in the retail/small business “pools” of loans, lack of seasoning with respect to loss expectations for the acquired and acquired covered loan portfolio as well as additional loan commitments that are not yet funded that will require allocation of additional reserves currently unallocated.

The Company uses credit risk ratings, which reflect the Bank’s assessment of a loan’s risk or loss potential, for purposes of assessing the appropriate level of reserve for loan losses. The Bank’s credit risk rating definitions along with applicable borrower characteristics for each credit risk rating are as follows:

Acceptable

The borrower is a reasonable credit risk and demonstrates the ability to repay the loan from normal business operations. Loans are generally made to companies operating in an economy and/or industry that is generally sound. The borrower tends to operate in regional or local markets and has achieved sufficient revenues for the business to be financially viable. The borrowers financial performance has been consistent in normal economic times and has been average or better than average for its industry.

A loan can also be considered Acceptable even though the borrower may have some vulnerability to downturns in the economy due to marginally satisfactory working capital and debt service cushion. Availability of alternate financing sources may be limited or nonexistent. In some cases, the borrower’s management, may have limited depth or continuity but is still considered capable. An adequate primary source of repayment is identified while secondary sources may be illiquid, more speculative, less readily identified, or reliant upon collateral liquidation. Loan agreements will be well defined, including several financial performance covenants and detailed operating covenants. This category also includes commercial loans to individuals with average or better than average capacity to repay.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Pass-Watch

Loans are graded Pass-Watch when temporary situations increase the level of the Bank’s risk associated with the loan, and remain graded Pass-Watch until the situation has been corrected. These situations may involve one or more weaknesses in cash flow, collateral value or indebtedness that could, if not corrected within a reasonable period of time, jeopardize the full repayment of the debt. In general, loans in this category remain adequately protected by the borrower’s net worth and paying capacity, or pledged collateral.

Special Mention

A Special Mention credit has potential weaknesses that may, if not checked or corrected, weaken the loan or leave the Bank inadequately protected at some future date. Loans in this category are deemed by management of the Bank to be currently protected but reflect potential problems that warrant more than the usual management attention but do not justify a Substandard classification.

Substandard

Substandard loans are those inadequately protected by the net worth and paying capacity of the obligor and/or by the value of the pledged collateral, if any. Substandard loans have a high probability of payment default or they have other well-defined weaknesses. They require more intensive supervision and borrowers are generally characterized by current or expected unprofitable operations, inadequate debt service coverage, inadequate liquidity, or marginal capitalization. Repayment may depend on collateral or other credit risk mitigants.

CRE and construction loans are classified Substandard when well-defined weaknesses are present which jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the loan. Well-defined weaknesses include a project’s lack of marketability, inadequate cash flow or collateral support, failure to complete construction on time, and/or the project’s failure to fulfill economic expectations. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

In addition, Substandard loans also include impaired loans. Impaired loans bear the characteristics of Substandard loans as described above, and the Company has determined it does not expect timely payment of all contractually due interest and principal. Impaired loans may be adequately secured by collateral.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Bank reduced loans classified as special mention and substandard in the originated loan portfolio by $14.6 million, while total loans classified as special mention and substandard increased $17.5 million as a result of the loans acquired in the merger. Remediation on the originated portfolio was accomplished through credit upgrades mainly owing to improved obligor cash flows as well as payoffs/paydowns, and/or sales. Work began on the acquired and acquired covered portfolio at Acquisition Date.

The following table presents, by portfolio class, the recorded investment in loans by internally assigned grades at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Loan grades
	Acceptable		Pass-Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total
June 30, 2014
Originated loans (a):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	152,819	$	9,904	$	5,267	$	22,722	$	190,712
Non-owner occupied	330,458		12,670		15,377		7,322		365,827
Total commercial real estate loans	483,277		22,574		20,644		30,044		556,539
Construction	48,397		2,865		2,655		403		54,320
Residential real estate	99,486		1,504		22		963		101,975
Commercial and industrial	243,323		9,931		11,697		4,068		269,019
Consumer	34,786		—		—		19		34,805

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



	$	909,269	$	36,874	$	35,018	$	35,497	$	1,016,658

Acquired loans (b):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	47,566	$	—	$	4,417	$	284	$	52,267
Non-owner occupied	87,529		9,298		7,286		6,537		110,650
Total commercial real estate loans	135,095		9,298		11,703		6,821		162,917
Construction	46,916		792		—		419		48,127
Residential real estate	81,849		—		—		1,927		83,776
Commercial and industrial	25,885		20		1,091		97		27,093
Consumer	2,676		—		—		81		2,757
	$	292,421	$	10,110	$	12,794	$	9,345	$	324,670

Acquired covered loans (c):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	11,295	$	—	$	1,069	$	719	$	13,083
Non-owner occupied	13,778		366		563		4,937		19,644
Total commercial real estate loans	25,073		366		1,632		5,656		32,727
Construction	—		2,512		—		52		2,564
Residential real estate	10,529		546		—		2,053		13,128
Commercial and industrial	4,064		—		—		557		4,621
Consumer	560		—		—		—		560
	$	40,226	$	3,424	$	1,632	$	8,318	$	53,600

Total loans:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	211,680	$	9,904	$	10,753	$	23,725	$	256,062
Non-owner occupied	431,765		22,334		23,226		18,796		496,121
Total commercial real estate loans	643,445		32,238		33,979		42,521		752,183
Construction	95,313		6,169		2,655		874		105,011
Residential real estate	191,864		2,050		22		4,943		198,879
Commercial and industrial	273,272		9,951		12,788		4,722		300,733
Consumer	38,022		—		—		100		38,122
	$	1,241,916	$	50,408	$	49,444	$	53,160	$	1,394,928

(a) Originated loans are loans organically made through the Company's normal and customary origination process
(b) Acquired loans are loans acquired in the acquisition of Home, discussed elsewhere in this report, less acquired covered loans
(c) Acquired covered loans acquired in the acquisition of Home that are covered under FDIC loss share agreements

December 31, 2013
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	147,865	$	19,798	$	14,730	$	22,605	$	204,998
Non-owner occupied	278,854		33,827		24,188		10,145		347,014
Total commercial real estate loans	426,719		53,625		38,918		32,750		552,012
Construction	46,274		2,772		2,131		1,326		52,503

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



Residential real estate	98,633		1,570		147		1,207		101,557
Commercial and industrial	242,053		3,518		2,694		5,905		254,170
Consumer	35,984		—		—		6		35,990
	$	849,663	$	61,485	$	43,890	$	41,194	$	996,232

The following table presents, by portfolio class, an age analysis of past due loans, including loans placed on non-accrual at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	30-89 days past due		90 days or more past due		Total past due		Current		Total loans
June 30, 2014
Originated loans (a):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	250	$	2,612	$	2,862	$	187,850	$	190,712
Non-owner occupied	222		332		554		365,273		365,827
Total commercial real estate loans	472		2,944		3,416		553,123		556,539
Construction	—		746		746		53,574		54,320
Residential real estate	326		220		546		101,429		101,975
Commercial and industrial	805		665		1,470		267,549		269,019
Consumer	157		19		176		34,629		34,805
	$	1,760	$	4,594	$	6,354	$	1,010,304	$	1,016,658

Acquired loans (b):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52,267	$	52,267
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		110,650		110,650
Total commercial real estate loans	—		—		—		162,917		162,917
Construction	—		—		—		48,127		48,127
Residential real estate	1,285		527		1,812		81,964		83,776
Commercial and industrial	4		—		4		27,089		27,093
Consumer	49		—		49		2,708		2,757
	$	1,338	$	527	$	1,865	$	322,805	$	324,670

Acquired covered loans (c):
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	—	$	84	$	84	$	12,999	$	13,083
Non-owner occupied	—		27		27		19,617		19,644
Total commercial real estate loans	—		111		111		32,616		32,727
Construction	—		—		—		2,564		2,564
Residential real estate	278		—		278		12,850		13,128
Commercial and industrial	—		50		50		4,571		4,621
Consumer	22		—		22		538		560
	$	300	$	161	$	461	$	53,139	$	53,600

Total loans:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	250	$	2,696	$	2,946	$	253,116	$	256,062
Non-owner occupied	222		359		581		495,540		496,121

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



Total commercial real estate loans	472		3,055		3,527		748,656		752,183
Construction	—		746		746		104,265		105,011
Residential real estate	1,889		747		2,636		196,243		198,879
Commercial and industrial	809		715		1,524		299,209		300,733
Consumer	228		19		247		37,875		38,122
	$	3,398	$	5,282	$	8,680	$	1,386,248	$	1,394,928

(a) Originated loans are loans organically made through the Company's normal and customary origination process
(b) Acquired loans are loans acquired in the acquisition of Home, discussed elsewhere in this report, less acquired covered loans
(c) Acquired covered loans acquired in the acquisition of Home that are covered under FDIC loss share agreements

December 31, 2013
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	959	$	2,905	$	3,864	$	201,134	$	204,998
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		347,014		347,014
Total commercial real estate loans	959		2,905		3,864		548,148		552,012
Construction	215		119		334		52,169		52,503
Residential real estate	436		163		599		100,958		101,557
Commercial and industrial	597		2,077		2,674		251,496		254,170
Consumer	53		6		59		35,931		35,990
	$	2,260	$	5,270	$	7,530	$	988,702	$	996,232

Loans contractually past due 90 days or more on which the Company continued to accrue interest were $0.8 million and $1.1 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

The following table presents information related to impaired loans, by portfolio class, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Impaired loans
	With a related allowance		Without a related allowance		Total recorded balance		Unpaid principal balance		Related allowance
June 30, 2014
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	1,620	$	4,238	$	5,858	$	8,463	$	153
Non-owner occupied	1,104		21,682		22,786		22,864		19
Total commercial real estate loans	2,724		25,920		28,644		31,327		172
Construction	—		963		963		963		—
Residential real estate	—		461		461		582		—
Commercial and industrial	2,766		1,027		3,793		4,424		29
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—
	$	5,490	$	28,371	$	33,861	$	37,296	$	201

December 31, 2013
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	2,772	$	6,582	$	9,354	$	12,707	$	652
Non-owner occupied	1,116		21,757		22,873		22,904		13
Total commercial real estate loans	3,888		28,339		32,227		35,611		665
Construction	751		1,236		1,987		2,029		—
Residential real estate	174		256		430		515		62
Commercial and industrial	4,074		1,749		5,823		6,701		56
Consumer	—		—		—		—		—
	$	8,887	$	31,580	$	40,467	$	44,856	$	783

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the total recorded balance of impaired loans in the above table included $23.0 million and $33.2 million, respectively, of Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”) loans which were not on non-accrual status.

The following table presents, by portfolio class, the average recorded investment in impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	6,120	$	15,179	$	7,198	$	15,447
Non-owner occupied	22,762		28,089		22,799		27,685
Total commercial real estate loans	28,882		43,268		29,997		43,132
Construction	1,351		2,479		1,563		4,897
Residential real estate	443		2,751		439		3,447
Commercial and industrial	4,515		8,043		4,951		8,563
Consumer	—		969		—		1,192
	$	35,191	$	57,510	$	36,950	$	61,231

Interest income recognized for cash payments received on impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was insignificant.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Information with respect to the Company’s non-accrual loans, by portfolio class, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows (dollars in thousands):



	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	4,222	$	4,443
Non-owner occupied	1,431		280
Total commercial real estate loans	5,653		4,723
Construction	495		236
Residential real estate	4,222		399
Commercial and industrial	1,229		1,868
Consumer	81		—
Total non-accrual loans	$	11,680	$	7,226

Accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	—	$	—
Non-owner occupied	—		—
Total commercial real estate loans	—		—
Construction	746		—
Residential real estate	—		—
Commercial and industrial	25		1,077
Consumer	19		6
Total accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more	$	790	$	1,083

TDRs

The Company allocated $0.2 million and $0.8 million of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. TDRs involve the restructuring of terms to allow customers to mitigate the risk of foreclosure by meeting a lower loan payment requirement based upon their current cash flow. As indicated above, TDRs may also include loans to borrowers experiencing financial distress that renewed at existing contractual rates, but below market rates for comparable credit quality. The Company has been actively utilizing these programs and working with its customers to improve obligor cash flow and related prospect for repayment. Concessions may include, but are not limited to, interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, deferral of interest payments, extension of the maturity date, and other actions intended to minimize potential losses to the Company. For each commercial loan restructuring, a comprehensive credit underwriting analysis of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects of repayment under the revised terms is performed to assess whether the new structure can be successful and whether cash flows will be sufficient to support the restructured debt. Generally, if the loan is on accrual at the time of restructuring, it will remain on accrual after the restructuring. After six consecutive payments under the restructured terms, a nonaccrual restructured loan is reviewed for possible upgrade to accruing status.

Typically, once a loan is identified as a TDR it will retain that designation until it is paid off, because restructured loans generally are not at market rates following restructuring. Under certain circumstances a TDR may be removed from TDR status if it is determined to no longer be impaired and the loan is at a competitive interest rate. Under such circumstances, allowance allocations for loans removed from TDR status would be based on the historical allocation for the applicable loan grade and loan class.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

The following table presents, by portfolio segment, information with respect to the Company’s loans that were modified and recorded as TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended June 30,
	2014			2013
	Number of loans	TDR outstanding recorded investment		Number of loans	TDR outstanding recorded investment
Commercial real estate	—	$	—	—	$	—
Construction	—	—		—	—
Residential real estate	—	—		—	—
Commercial and industrial	—	—		1	3
Consumer	—	—		—	—
	—	$	—	1	$	3



	Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013
	Number of loans	TDR outstanding recorded investment		Number of loans	TDR outstanding recorded investment
Commercial real estate	—	$	—	5	$	27,677
Construction	—	—		—	—
Residential real estate	—	—		—	—
Commercial and industrial	—	—		4	277
Consumer	—	—		—	—
	—	$	—	9	$	27,954

There were no loans modified and recorded as TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. During the same period in 2013, TDR activity was primarily the result of remediation to bolster cash flow of stressed loans, and included the restructuring of a large CRE credit in the Bank’s loan portfolio.

At both June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had remaining commitments to lend on loans accounted for as TDRs of $0.

The following table presents, by portfolio segment, the post modification recorded investment for TDRs restructured during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 by the primary type of concession granted. There were no TDRs restructured during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.



Three Months Ended June 30, 2013	Rate reduction		Term extension		Rate reduction and term extension		Total
Commercial real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Construction	—		—		—		—
Residential real estate	—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial	—		3		—		3
Consumer	—		—		—		—
	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	3

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



Six Months Ended June 30, 2013	Rate reduction		Term extension		Rate reduction and term extension		Total
Commercial real estate	$	3,809	$	2,368	$	21,500	$	27,677
Construction	—		—		—		—
Residential real estate	—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial	174		103		—		277
Consumer	—		—		—		—
	$	3,983	$	2,471	$	21,500	$	27,954

The following table presents, by portfolio segment, the TDRs which had payment defaults during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 that had been previously restructured within the last twelve months prior to June 30, 2014 and 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013
	Number of loans	TDRs restructured in the period with a payment default		Number of loans	TDRs restructured in the period with a payment default
Commercial real estate	—	$	—	2	$	3,500
Construction	—	—		—	—
Residential real estate	—	—		—	—
Commercial and industrial loans	—	—		—	—
Consumer loans	—	—		—	—
	—	$	—	2	$	3,500

5. Other Real Estate Owned, net

The following table presents activity related to OREO for the periods shown (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,995		$	5,684		$	3,144		$	6,552
Additions	3,514			158			3,514			1,098
Dispositions	(166		)	(7,757		)	(314		)	(13,117		)
Change in valuation allowance	(619		)	4,521			(620		)	8,073
Balances at end of period	$	5,724		$	2,606		$	5,724		$	2,606

The following table summarizes activity in the OREO valuation allowance for the periods shown (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,395		$	7,090		$	2,394		$	10,642
Additions to the valuation allowance	642			27			706			224
Reductions due to sales	(23		)	(4,548		)	(86		)	(8,297		)
Balance at end of period	$	3,014		$	2,569		$	3,014		$	2,569

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

The following table summarizes OREO expenses for the periods shown (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014			2013
Operating costs	$	50	$	75		$	59		$	111
Net (gains) losses on dispositions	18		(104		)	(63		)	(60		)
Increases in valuation allowance	642		27			706			224
Total	$	710	$	(2	)	$	702		$	275

6. Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)

The Bank sells a predominant share of the mortgage loans it originates into the secondary market while retaining servicing of such loans. MSRs included in other assets in the condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are accounted for at the lower of origination value less accumulated amortization or current fair value. The net carrying value of MSRs at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $2.2 million. There was no valuation allowance at June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

The following table presents activity in MSRs for the periods shown (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,228		$	1,546		$	2,232		$	1,308
Additions	191			339			286			649
Amortization	(180		)	(99		)	(279		)	(171		)
Change in valuation allowance	—			—			—			—
Balances at end of period	$	2,239		$	1,786		$	2,239		$	1,786

Mortgage banking income, net, consisted of the following for the periods shown (dollars in thousands):



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Origination and processing fees	$	196		$	123		$	298		$	296
Gain on sales of mortgage loans, net	442			918			716			1,882
MSR valuation allowance	—			—			—			—
Servicing fees	164			118			321			213
Amortization	(180		)	(99		)	(279		)	(171		)
Mortgage banking income, net	$	622		$	1,060		$	1,056		$	2,220

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

7. Basic and Diluted Net Income per Common Share

The Company’s basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company’s diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus any incremental shares arising from the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation.

The numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 can be reconciled as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share data):



	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2014			2013		2014			2013
Net (loss) income	$	(4,678	)	$	46,424	$	(3,735	)	$	48,120

Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic	58,498,809			47,172,103		52,865,943			47,156,700
Dilutive securities	222			364,683		31,686			238,658
Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted	58,499,031			47,536,786		52,897,629			47,395,358
Common stock equivalent shares excluded due to antidilutive effect	381,413			32,399		385,350			32,399

Basic and diluted:
Net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.08	)	$	0.98	$	(0.07	)	$	1.02
Net (loss) income per common share (diluted)	$	(0.08	)	$	0.98	$	(0.07	)	$	1.02

8. Stock-Based Compensation

At June 30, 2014, 4,147,660 shares reserved under the stock-based compensation plans were available for future grants.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company granted 434,094 shares of restricted stock with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $4.80 per share, which vest between 2015 through 2019. During the same period, no stock options were granted. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted 292,561 additional shares of restricted stock with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $5.81 per share, which vest between 2014 and 2016. During the same period, the Company also granted 5,507 stock options with a weighted-average grant date fair value of approximately $6.80 per option. These stock options vest in 2016. The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions to value options granted in 2013:



	2013
Dividend yield	—	%
Expected volatility	77.2	%
Risk-free interest rate	1.1	%
Expected option lives	6.0 years

The dividend yield was based on historical dividend information. The Company has not paid dividends since the third quarter of 2008 resulting in the dividend yield of 0.0%. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock price. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant for periods corresponding with the expected lives of the options granted. The expected option lives represent the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding, giving consideration to vesting schedules and historical exercise and forfeiture patterns.

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of publicly-traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The Black-Scholes model is affected by subjective assumptions including historical volatility of the Company’s common stock price. Because the Company has relatively low average trading volume in its common stock, its estimated volatility may be higher than publicly-traded companies with greater trading volumes.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

The following table presents the activity related to stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:



	Options		Weighted- average exercise price		Weighted- average remaining contractual term (years)	Aggregate intrinsic value (000)
Options outstanding at January 1, 2014	111,571		$	38.92	6.2	$	—
Canceled / forfeited	(2,227	)	70.21		N/A	N/A
Expired	(4,569	)	129.60		N/A	N/A
Options outstanding at June 30, 2014	104,775		$	34.30	6.0	$	—
Options exercisable at June 30, 2014	86,281		$	40.38	5.5	$	—


Options outstanding at January 1, 2013	139,446		$	53.66	6.2	$	79.4
Granted	5,507		6.80		9.7	—
Canceled / forfeited	(8,090	)	110.67		N/A	N/A
Expired	(10,806	)	90.72		N/A	N/A
Options outstanding at June 30, 2013	126,057		$	44.78	6.5	$	40.9
Options exercisable at June 30, 2013	88,151		$	61.43	5.4	$	27.3

Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $0.02 million and $0.05 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, there was approximately $0.04 million unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options which will be recognized over the remaining vesting periods of the underlying stock options.

The following table presents the activity related to nonvested restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2014:



	Number of shares		Weighted- average grant date fair value per share
Nonvested as of January 1, 2014	354,270		$	9.41
Granted	434,094		4.80
Vested	(153,762	)	5.97
Canceled / forfeited	(5,663	)	5.83
Nonvested as of June 30, 2014	628,939		$	7.10

Restricted stock is generally scheduled to vest over a three to five year period, with the unearned compensation related to restricted stock amortized to expense on a straight-line basis. As of June 30, 2014, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock totaled approximately $2.8 million. Total expense recognized by the Company for nonvested restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively. There was no unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units (“RSUs”) at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as all RSUs were fully-vested at the date of the grant.

9. Interest Rate Swap Derivatives

Derivative instruments are contracts between two or more parties that have a notional amount and an underlying variable, require no net investment and allow for the net settlement of positions. The notional amount serves as the basis for the payment provision of the contract and takes the form of units, such as shares or dollars. The underlying variable represents a specified interest rate, index, or other component. The interaction between the notional amount and the underlying variable determines the number of

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

units to be exchanged between the parties and influences the market value of the derivative contract. The Company obtains dealer quotation to value its derivative contracts.

The Company periodically enters into certain commercial loan interest rate swap agreements in order to provide commercial loan customers the ability to convert from variable to fixed interest rates. Under these agreements, the Company provides the customer with a variable rate loan and enters into an interest rate swap in which the customer receives a variable rate payment in exchange for a fixed rate payment. The Company offsets its risk exposure by entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with a dealer counterparty for the same notional amount and length of term as the customer interest rate swap providing the dealer counterparty with a fixed rate payment in exchange for a variable rate payment. Generally, these instruments help the Company manage exposure to market risk and meet customer financing needs. Market risk represents the possibility that economic value or net interest income will be adversely affected by fluctuations in external factors such as market-driven interest rates and prices or other economic factors.

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to these agreements. Credit risk of the financial contract is controlled through the credit approval, limits, and monitoring procedures and management does not expect the counterparties to fail their obligations.

In connection with the interest rate swaps between the Company and the dealer counterparties, the agreements contain a provision where if the Company fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations. Similarly, the Company could be required to settle its obligations under certain of its agreements if certain credit ratings fall below specified standards or if specific regulatory events occur, such as a publicly issued memorandum of understanding, cease and desist order, or a termination of insurance coverage by the FDIC.

As of June 30, 2014, the notional values or contractual amounts and fair values of the Company's derivatives not designated in hedge relationships were as follows (dollars in thousands).



	Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	June 30, 2014				June 30, 2014
	Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value (1)		Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value (2)
Interest rate swaps	$	46,274	$	2,193	$	46,274	$	2,193

(1) Included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(2) Included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Swap fee income, as included in non-interest income, was $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively. No derivatives instruments were in place for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013.

The Company generally posts collateral against derivative liabilities in the form of cash. Collateral posted against derivative liabilities was $2.1 million and $0.3 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and do not take into account the effects of master netting agreements. Master netting agreements allow the Company to settle all derivative contracts held with a single counterparty on a net basis and to offset net derivative position with related collateral where applicable.

The following table illustrates the potential effect of the Company's derivative master netting arrangements, by type of financial instrument, on the Company's balance sheet as of June 30, 2014 (in thousands):

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



	June 30, 2014
							Gross Amounts of Financial Instruments Not Offset in the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts Recognized		Amounts offset in the Balance Sheet		Net Amounts in the Balance Sheet		Netting Adjustment Per Applicable Master Netting Agreements		Fair Value of Financial Collateral in the Balance Sheet		Net Amount
Asset Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	$	2,193	$	—	$	2,193	$	—	$	—	$	2,193

Liability Derivatives
Interest rate swaps	$	2,193	$	—	$	2,193	$	—	$	2,090	$	103

10. Income Taxes

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets (“DTA”), management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the DTA will or will not be realized. The Company's ultimate realization of the DTA is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the nature and amount of historical and projected future taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and available tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The amount of deferred taxes recognized could be impacted by changes to any of these variables.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded a $5.1 million and $4.8 million income tax benefit, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a $51.7 million and $51.8 million income tax benefit, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, the net deferred tax asset was $70.0 million. Included in the net deferred taxes are NOL's (tax affected) for federal taxes of $30.7 million, Oregon state taxes of $3.1 million and Idaho state taxes of $2.7 million. Also included in the net deferred taxes are federal and state tax credits of $1.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. This is compared with a deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2013 of $50.1 million. The Company reversed substantially all of the its DTA valuation allowance at June 30, 2013 of $41.6 million and the reversal of certain previously written-off deferred tax benefits of $8.5 million resulting from the reassessment of the Company's Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") Section 382 limitations and other related analyses.

There are a number of tax issues that impact the deferred tax asset balance including changes in temporary differences between the financial statement recognition of revenue and expenses, estimates as to the deductibility of prior losses and potential consequence of Section 382 of the IRC. See also “Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates - Deferred Income Taxes” included in Part II, Item 7 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

11. Fair Value Measurements

GAAP establishes a hierarchy for determining fair value measurements which includes three levels and is based upon the valuation techniques used to measure assets and liabilities. The three levels are as follows:


•	Level 1: Inputs that are quoted unadjusted prices in active markets - that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date - for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2: Inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means.


•	Level 3: Inputs that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value. In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internal or third party models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Company’s creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes that the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain assets and liabilities could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Furthermore, the reported fair value amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the presentation dates, and, therefore, estimates of fair value after the condensed consolidated balance sheet date may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to valuation hierarchy:

Investment securities available-for-sale: Where quoted prices for identical assets are available in an active market, investment securities available-for-sale are classified within level 1 of the hierarchy. If quoted market prices for identical securities are not available, then fair values are estimated by independent sources using pricing models and/or quoted prices of investment securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. The Company has categorized its investment securities available-for-sale as level 2, since a majority of such securities are MBS which are mainly priced in this latter manner.

Interest rate swap derivatives: The fair value of interest rate swap derivatives is determined based on mid-market values derived from market pricing data available for comparable transactions in the over-the-counter interest rate derivative market (Level 2 inputs). The fair value adjustment is included in other assets or other liabilities.

Impaired loans: In accordance with GAAP, loans measured for impairment are reported at estimated fair value, including impaired loans measured at an observable market price (if available), the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if collateral dependent). Estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral is determined by appraisals or independent valuations which are then adjusted for the estimated costs related to liquidation of the collateral. Management’s ongoing review of appraisal information may result in additional discounts or adjustments to valuation based upon more recent market sales activity or more current appraisal information derived from properties of similar type and/or locale. A significant portion of the Bank’s impaired loans are measured using the estimated fair market value of the collateral less the estimated costs to sell. The Company has categorized its impaired loans as level 3.

OREO: The Company’s OREO is measured at estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is generally determined based on third-party appraisals of fair value in an orderly sale. Historically, appraisals have considered comparable sales of like assets in reaching a conclusion as to fair value. Since many recent real estate sales could be termed “distressed sales”, and since a preponderance have been short-sale or foreclosure related, this has directly impacted appraisal valuation estimates.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Estimated costs to sell OREO are based on standard market factors. The valuation of OREO is subject to significant external and internal judgment. Management periodically reviews OREO to determine whether the property continues to be carried at the lower of its recorded book value or estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. The Company has categorized its OREO as level 3.

The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows (dollars in thousands):



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2014
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	—	$	276,096	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives	—		2,193		—
Total assets	$	—	$	278,289	$	—

Liabilities:
Interest rate swap derivatives	$	—	$	2,193	$	—

December 31, 2013
Assets:
Investment securities available-for-sale	$	—	$	194,481	$	—

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (e.g., the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments when there is evidence of impairment). The following table represents the assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis by the Company at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2014
Impaired loans with specific valuation allowances	$	—	$	—	$	5,490
Other real estate owned	—		—		5,724
	$	—	$	—	$	11,214

December 31, 2013
Impaired loans with specific valuation allowances	$	—	$	—	$	8,887
Other real estate owned	—		—		3,144
	$	—	$	—	$	12,031

The following table presents quantitative information about level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	June 30, 2014
	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input
Impaired loans	$	5,490	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs of 5% to 10% Additional discounts of 5% to 50% to appraised value to reflect liquidation value
Other real estate owned	$	5,724	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs of 5% to 10%

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)



	December 31, 2013
	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input
Impaired loans	$	8,887	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs of 5% to 10% Additional discounts of 5% to 50% to appraised value to reflect liquidation value
Other real estate owned	$	3,144	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs of 5% to 10%

The Company did not change the methodology used to determine fair value for any assets or liabilities during 2013, or during the six months ended June 30, 2014. In addition, for any given class of assets, the Company did not have any transfers between level 1, level 2, or level 3 during 2013 or the six months ended June 30, 2014.

The following disclosures are made in accordance with the provisions of GAAP, which requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments where it is practicable to estimate that value.

In cases where quoted market values are not available, the Company primarily uses present value techniques to estimate the fair value of its financial instruments. Valuation methods require considerable judgment, and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used. Accordingly, the estimates provided herein do not necessarily indicate amounts which could be realized in a current market exchange.

In addition, as the Company normally intends to hold the majority of its financial instruments until maturity, it does not expect to realize many of the estimated amounts disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for items which are not defined as financial instruments but which may have significant value. The Company does not believe that it would be practicable to estimate a representational fair value for these types of items as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Because GAAP excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements, any aggregation of the fair value amounts presented would not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of its financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates the estimated fair value of these instruments.

Investment securities: See above description.

FHLB stock: The carrying amount approximates the estimated fair value of this investment.

Loans: The estimated fair value of non-impaired loans is calculated by discounting the contractual cash flows of the loans using June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 origination rates. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated. Estimated fair values for impaired loans are determined using an observable market price, (if available), the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if collateral dependent) as described above. Observable market prices for community bank loans are not generally available given the non-homogenous characteristics of such loans.

BOLI: The carrying amount approximates the estimated fair value of these instruments.

MSRs: The estimated fair value of MSRs is calculated by discounting the expected future contractual cash flows. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount, if any, by which the amortized cost of the rights exceeds its estimated fair value. Impairment, if deemed temporary, is recognized through a valuation allowance to the extent that estimated fair value is less than the recorded amount.

Interest rate swap derivatives: See above description.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Deposits: The estimated fair value of demand deposits, consisting of checking, interest bearing demand, and savings deposit accounts, is represented by the amounts payable on demand. At the reporting date, the estimated fair value of time deposits is calculated by discounting the scheduled cash flows using the June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 rates offered on those instruments.

Other borrowings: The fair value of other borrowings (including federal funds purchased, if any) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Bank’s June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Loan commitments and standby letters of credit: The majority of the Bank’s commitments to extend credit have variable interest rates and “escape” clauses if the customer’s credit quality deteriorates. Therefore, the fair values of these items are not significant and are not included in the following table.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s significant on-balance sheet financial instruments at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were approximately as follows (dollars in thousands):



		June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Level in Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying value		Estimated fair value		Carrying value		Estimated fair value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Level 1	$	164,272	$	164,272	$	81,849	$	81,849
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale	Level 2	276,096		276,096		194,481		194,481
Held-to-maturity	Level 2	154,717		155,435		1,320		1,342
FHLB stock	Level 2	26,178		26,178		9,913		9,913
Loans held-for-sale	Level 2	4,944		4,944		10,359		10,359
Loans, net	Level 3	1,372,909		1,370,452		973,618		977,142
BOLI	Level 3	52,895		52,895		36,567		36,567
MSRs	Level 3	2,239		2,801		2,232		2,790
Interest rate swap derivatives	Level 2	2,193		2,193		—		—

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	Level 2	1,942,035		1,943,055		1,167,320		1,167,532
FHLB borrowings	Level 2	—		—		27,000		27,000
Interest rate swap derivatives	Level 2	2,193		2,193		—		—

12. Regulatory Matters

Bancorp and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Bancorp and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Bancorp’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Bancorp and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the tables below) of Tier 1 capital to average assets and Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets (all as defined in the regulations).

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

Federal banking regulators are required to take prompt corrective action if an insured depository institution fails to satisfy certain minimum capital requirements. Such actions could potentially include a leverage capital limit, a risk-based capital requirement, and any other measure of capital deemed appropriate by the federal banking regulator for measuring the capital adequacy of an insured depository institution. In addition, payment of dividends by Bancorp and the Bank are subject to restriction by state and federal regulators and availability of retained earnings.

Bancorp’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):



	Actual				Regulatory minimum to be "adequately capitalized"				Regulatory minimum to be "well capitalized"
	Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2014
Tier 1 leverage (to average assets)	$	162,953	9.8	%	$	66,415	4.0	%	$	83,019	5.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	162,953		10.6		61,544		4.0		92,315		6.0
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	182,211		11.8		123,087		8.0		153,859		10.0

December 31, 2013
Tier 1 leverage (to average assets)	$	142,937	10.5	%	$	54,527	4.0	%	$	68,159	5.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	142,937		13.0		44,021		4.0		66,031		6.0
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	156,787		14.3		88,041		8.0		110,052		10.0

The Bank’s actual and required capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):



	Actual				Regulatory minimum to be "adequately capitalized"				Regulatory minimum to be "well capitalized"
	Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount		Ratio		Capital Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2014
Tier 1 leverage (to average assets)	$	157,125	9.5	%	$	66,191	4.0	%	$	82,739	5.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	157,125		10.3		61,324		4.0		91,986		6.0
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	176,315		11.5		122,648		8.0		153,310		10.0

December 31, 2013
Tier 1 leverage (to average assets)	$	142,964	10.5	%	$	54,529	4.0	%	$	68,162	5.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	142,964		13.0		43,939		4.0		65,909		6.0
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	156,788		14.3		87,879		8.0		109,848		10.0

13. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Cascade Bancorp & Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

(unaudited)

14. New Authoritative Accounting Guidance

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 establishes a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for virtually all industries under U.S. GAAP, including those that previously followed industry-specific guidance such as the real estate, construction and software industries. The revenue standard’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this objective, the standard requires five basic steps: i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with three transition methods available - full retrospective, retrospective and cumulative effect approach. Adoption of ASU 2014-09 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04, "Receivables- Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure" ("ASU 2014-04"). The provisions of ASU 2014-04 clarify that when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either 1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or 2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through similar legal agreement. The provisions of ASU 2014-04 are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists" ("ASU 2013-11"). ASU 2013-11 requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. No new recurring disclosures are required. The amendments are effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013 and are to be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. Retrospective application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion highlights key information as determined by management but may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding, the following should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2014, including its audited 2013 consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013.

In this documents please note that “we” “our” “us” “Cascade” or the “Company” refer collectively to Cascade Bancorp (“Bancorp”), an Oregon chartered single bank holding company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bank of the Cascades (the “Bank”).

Cautionary Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements about the Company’s plans and anticipated results of operations and financial condition. These statements include, but are not limited to, our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and are not statements of historical fact. When used in this report, the words “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “predicts,” “projections,” “continue” and other similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements,

as do any other statements that expressly or implicitly predict future events, results or performance, and such statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially and adversely from our expectations as indicated in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include: the general condition of, and changes in, the economy of the States of Oregon and Idaho generally, and Central, Southern and Northwest Oregon, as well as the greater Boise/Treasure Valley, Idaho area; our ability to maintain asset quality and expand our market share or net interest margin; and expected cost savings, synergies and other related benefits of our recently completed merger with Home might not be realized within the expected timeframe and costs or difficulties relating to the integration might be greater than expected. Further, actual results may be affected by competition with other financial institutions; customer acceptance of new products and services; the regulatory environment in which we operate; and general trends in the local, regional and national banking industry and economy. Certain risks and uncertainties, and the Company’s success in managing such risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, including, among others, the risk factors disclosed in Part II - Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I - Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014 for the year ended December 31, 2013. However, you should be aware that these factors are not an exhaustive list, and you should not assume these are the only factors that may cause our actual results to differ from our expectations

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Company undertakes no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances after the date hereof. Readers should carefully review all disclosures filed by the Company from time to time with the SEC.

Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies upon which our financial condition depends, and which involve the most complex or subjective decisions or assessments are as follows.

Reserve for Credit Losses

The Company’s reserve for credit losses provides for estimated losses based upon evaluations of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and related loan commitments. Arriving at an estimate of the appropriate level of reserve for credit losses (which consists of our reserve for loan losses and our reserve for loan commitments) involves a high degree of judgment and assessment of multiple variables that result in a methodology with relatively complex calculations and analysis. Management uses historical information to assess the adequacy of the reserve for loan losses and considers qualitative factors including economic conditions and a range of other factors in its determination of the reserve. On an ongoing basis, the Company seeks to enhance and refine its methodology such that the reserve is at an appropriate level and responsive to changing conditions. In this regard, as of June 30, 2013 management implemented a homogeneous pool approach to estimating reserves for consumer and small business loans. As of June 30, 2014, this change has not had a material effect on the level of the reserve for loan losses. However, the Company’s methodology may not accurately estimate inherent loss or external factors and changing economic conditions may impact the loan portfolio and the level of reserves in ways currently unforeseen.

The reserve for loan losses is increased by provisions for loan losses and by recoveries of loans previously charged-off and reduced by loans charged-off. The reserve for loan commitments is increased and decreased through non-interest expense. For a full discussion of the Company’s methodology of assessing the adequacy of the reserve for credit losses, see "Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality” in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision (credit) for income taxes. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the expected amount to be realized.

Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is “more likely than not.” Uncertain tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the amount of benefit that management believes has a greater than 50% likelihood of

realization upon settlement. Tax benefits not meeting our realization criteria represent unrecognized tax benefits. We account for interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.

The Company reversed its deferred tax asset, or DTA, valuation allowance as of June 30, 2013 due to management’s determination that it was more likely than not that a significant portion of the Company's DTA would be realized. Management’s determination resulted from consideration of both the positive and negative evidence available that can be objectively verified. For a full discussion of the Company’s considerations, see "Deferred Income Taxes” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $70.0 million and $50.1 million, respectively. There are a number of tax issues that impact the deferred tax asset balance, including changes in temporary differences between the financial statement and tax recognition of revenue and expenses and estimates as to the deductibility of prior losses.

Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets

Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets acquired through loan foreclosure are initially recorded at estimated fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. The adjustment at the time of foreclosure is recorded through the reserve for loan losses. Due to the subjective nature of establishing the asset’s fair value when it is acquired, the actual fair value of the other real estate owned or foreclosed asset could differ from the original estimate. If it is determined that fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through non-interest expense. Operating costs associated with the assets after acquisition are also recorded as non-interest expense. Gains and losses on the disposition of other real estate owned and foreclosed assets are netted and posted to other non-interest expenses.

Economic Conditions

The Company's business is closely tied to the economies of Idaho and Oregon which in turn are influenced by regional and national economic trends and conditions. Economic conditions in both Idaho and Oregon have improved from the severe economic downturn in 2007 through 2009, and both regions have experienced gains in employment and real estate prices since such time. Economic conditions and real estate prices have also improved nationally since the economic downturn. However lingering effects of the economic downturn, including fiscal imbalances, continue to affect employment and business and consumer confidence to various degrees and the future direction of both the national and regional economies remains uncertain. The Company's markets continue to be sensitive to real estate values and unemployment rates continue to be higher than prior to the downturn. An unforeseen economic shock or a return of adverse economic conditions could cause deterioration of local economies and adversely affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Financial Highlights and Summary of the Second Quarter of 2014 (period ended June 30, 2014)


•	Net Loss for the Second Quarter of 2014: $4.7 million, or $0.08, per common share in the second quarter of 2014 compared to $46.4 million, or $0.98, per common share for the second quarter of 2013. The current quarter includes $9.9 million of merger related expenses (pre-tax).


•	Stockholders Equity/Book Value per Share: Stockholders' equity increased to $306.9 million, or $4.25, per share, at June 30, 2014 compared to $188.7 million, or $3.97 per share, at December 31, 2013. The increase was mainly a result of the acquisition of Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. ("Home").


•	Loans: Gross loans are up $398.9 million, or 40.1%, compared to December 31, 2013. The increase was a result of the addition of acquired and acquired covered loans of $378.3 million in the acquisition of Home.


•	Deposits: Total deposits are up $774.7 million, or 66.4%, compared to December 31, 2013. The increase was a result of the deposits acquired from Home at a fair value of $760.6 million.


•	Credit Quality: Reserve for loan losses at $20.5 million, or 1.47%, of total loans compared to $20.9 million, or 2.08%, of total loans at December 31, 2013; no loan loss provision was recorded in the first quarter of 2014 or 2013.


•	Credit Quality: Non-performing assets improved to 0.80% of total assets at June 30, 2014 compared to 0.81% at December 31, 2013.


•	Net Interest Margin ("NIM"): NIM was 3.98% for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 compared to 3.75% for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

On May 16, 2014 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company completed the acquisition of Home (the “Merger”) in a stock and cash transaction valued at $241.4 million. The transaction value includes $122.2 million in cash and the issuance of 24,309,131 shares of common stock issued by the Company. The completion of the Merger provided an expanded geographic footprint for the Company and increased the size of the balance sheet wherein the combined companies expect to realize economies of scale and other operating efficiencies.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS –Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013

Loans acquired in the Merger are recorded at fair value with no allowance for loan losses brought forward in accordance with purchase accounting principles. The net fair value adjustment to acquired loans from the Home acquisition was $6.1 million, representing a valuation adjustment for interest rate and credit quality which will be accreted over the life of the loans (approximately 10 years).

At June 30, 2014, $53.6 million or 14.2% of the $378.3 million in acquired and acquired covered loans were covered under loss sharing agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission ("FDIC"). These loss sharing agreements will expire five years after the date of the FDIC agreements for non-single family covered assets and ten years after the acquisitions date for single-family covered assets.

The Company has determined it will report on a cash basis any potential future benefits and/or costs incurred with respect to the remaining loss share receivables (or payables) under these agreements. The remaining benefit and/or cost of the FDIC Agreements are not expected to be material to the Company’s financial condition. In the acquired loan portfolio, $53.6 million in loans remain covered loans at June 30, 2014 of which 81.4% are currently performing. Estimated future losses on acquired covered loans are included in the fair value purchase accounting mark.

Total net loans and loans held-for-sale outstanding at June 30, 2014 was $1.4 billion, an increase of $393.9 million from December 31, 2013. Of this total, $378.3 million was from the Home acquired and acquired covered loan portfolio. The organic growth in loans was primarily attributable to increased balances of shared national credits in the commercial and industrial portfolio.

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, originated loan balances increased by $20.4 million mainly due to an increased commercial and industrial portfolio, primarily related to the Company's syndicated national credit portfolio.

Loans categorized as special mention and substandard totaled $102.6 million at June 30, 2014 as compared to $85.1 million at December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily a result of the acquisition of Home whose acquired portfolio included $32.1 million of special mention and substandard loans at June 30, 2014. The credit quality of the Company's originated loans continued to improve with special mention and substandard loans decreasing by $14.6 million from the balance at December 31, 2013. Remediation was accomplished through credit upgrades owing to improved obligor cash flows as well as payoffs/paydowns and/or charge offs related to the restructure of adversely risk rated loans. Non-performing assets as of June 30, 2014 were 0.80% of total assets as compared to 0.81% at December 31, 2013, including Home acquired and acquired covered non-performing loans. Net charge-offs during the second quarter of 2014 were $1.3 million; year to date there are net charge-offs of $0.4 million. The Company made no provision for loan losses as management believes the reserve for loan losses of $20.5 million at June 30, 2014 is adequate.

Total deposits as of June 30, 2014 were $1.9 billion, which represents an increase of $774.7 million from the balance at December 31, 2013. The increased balance was primarily a result of $760.6 million in fair value of added deposits from the acquisition of Home. As of June 30, 2014, 52.1% of total deposits are in checking account balances.

Non-interest income was $4.8 million in the second quarter of 2014 compared to non-interest income of $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2013, primarily due to an increase in service charges and card issuer and merchant fees, in part attributable to the additional Home customers. Non-interest expense increased $10.9 million in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013, due primarily to merger related expenses of $9.9 million in the second quarter of 2014.

As a result of the Merger, goodwill of $75.8 million was recorded. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of $241.4 million less the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired of $165.6 million. The goodwill is not amortized but the Company will periodically assess (at least on an annual basis) whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired.

Income Statement

The Company’s financial results for the second quarter of 2014 include revenues and expenses generated by assets acquired in the Merger since the Acquisition Date.

Net (Loss) Income

Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 was $0.08 per share, or $4.7 million, compared to net income of $0.98 per share, or $46.4 million, for the second quarter of 2013. The decrease in net income in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same

period in 2013 was primarily the result of an income tax benefit of $51.7 million being recorded in the second quarter of 2013 as a result of releasing the valuation allowance against the Company's DTA. The net loss for the second quarter 2014 also includes $9.9 million in transactional expenses related to our merger with Home.

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $3.7 million or $0.09 per share, compared to net income of $48.1 million or $1.02 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decreased net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily the result of the income tax benefit as described above. The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014 includes $10.8 million in transaction expenses related to our merger with Home.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $15.7 million for the second quarter of 2014, as compared to $11.5 million in the second quarter of 2013.

Total interest income increased $3.8 million from $12.4 million in the second quarter of 2013 to $16.2 million in the second quarter of 2014. The increase was due primarily to the addition of earning assets acquired in the Merger. Accretion of the Home fair value discount is accreted over the remaining term to maturity of the acquired loans into interest income on loans. Accretion will vary in the event of payoffs or paydowns of specific loans. For the quarter ended June 30, 2014, accretion was approximately $0.4 million.

Total interest expense for the second quarter of 2014 decreased $0.4 million compared to the second quarter of 2013. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased $1.0 million. This improvement in both periods was primarily due to a reduction in borrowings at June 30, 2014 compared to the year-ago periods. Other borrowing expense was nil for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $0.5 million and $0.9 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. This is due to the Company having no borrowings as of June 30, 2014 due to increased liquidity, partially as a result of the Merger. Deposit interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was slightly increased compared to the same periods in 2013 as a result of increased deposits acquired as a result of the Merger.

The net interest margin for the second quarter of 2014 was 3.98%, this compares to the prior quarter net interest margin of 3.83%. As described above, the Company’s strategic aim is to moderate duration risk in the combined balance sheet and better position the bank to benefit from rising market interest rates. In part, this strategy will include redeployment of long duration Home investment securities into a combination of floating and adjustable-rate assets. These actions are expected to occur over the next several quarters. Internal forecasts as to the effect of this strategy will be a net interest margin estimated between 3.65% to 3.75% by the fourth quarter of 2014 (inclusive of discount accretion of fair value marks). Because future interest rates are unpredictable and the execution of the Company’s redeployment strategy is uncertain no assurance can be given as to the achievement of the net interest margin forecast.

Components of Net Interest Margin

The following tables set forth the components of the Company's net interest margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The tables present average balance sheet information, interest income and yields on average interest-earning assets, interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities, net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin for the Company (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014							2013
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield or Rates		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield or Rates
Assets
Investment securities	$	305,757		$	2,020	2.65	%	$	226,690		$	1,381	2.44	%
Interest bearing balances due from other banks	67,571			45		0.27	%	102,951			66		0.26	%
Federal funds sold	22			—		—	%	22			—		—	%
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	17,426			—		—	%	10,185			—		—	%
Loans (1)(2)(3)	1,187,936			14,147		4.78	%	888,087			10,933		4.94	%
Total earning assets/interest income	1,578,712			16,212		4.12	%	1,227,935			12,380		4.04	%
Reserve for loan losses	(21,529		)					(24,241		)
Cash and due from banks	36,742							31,406
Premises and equipment, net	38,676							34,513
Bank-owned life insurance	44,158							36,005
Deferred tax asset	55,899							—
Goodwill	37,494							—
Accrued interest and other assets	32,252							17,343
Total assets	$	1,802,404						$	1,322,961


Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	709,598		217		0.12	%	$	527,481		182		0.14	%
Savings deposits	90,916			7		0.03	%	44,233			6		0.05	%
Time deposits	184,249			319		0.69	%	128,048			261		0.82	%
Other borrowings	1,978			1		0.20	%	59,560			460		3.10	%
Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense	986,741			544		0.22	%	759,322			909		0.48	%
Demand deposits	534,552							397,716
Other liabilities	32,020							20,844
Total liabilities	1,553,313							1,177,882
Stockholders' equity	249,091							145,079
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,802,404						$	1,322,961
Net interest income				$	15,668						$	11,471

Net interest spread						3.90	%						3.56	%

Net interest income to earning assets						3.98	%						3.75	%


(1)	Average non-performing loans included in the computation of average loans for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $9.3 million and $13.2 million, respectively.


(2)	Loan related fees, including prepayment penalties, recognized during the period and included in the yield calculation totaled approximately $1.0 million in 2014 and $0.4 million in 2013.


(3)	Includes loans held for sale.



	Six Months Ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2014							2013
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield or Rates		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Yield or Rates
Assets
Investment securities	$	249,439		$	3,348	2.71	%	$	236,216		$	2,703	2.31	%
Interest bearing balances due from other banks	56,888			72		0.26	%	86,184			103		0.24	%
Federal funds sold	22			—		—	%	23			—		—	%
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	13,679			—		—	%	10,228			—		—	%
Loans (1)(2)(3)	1,091,964			24,896		4.60	%	884,069			22,171		5.06	%
Total earning assets/interest income	1,411,992			28,316		4.04	%	1,216,720			24,977		4.14	%
Reserve for loan losses	(21,506		)					(25,680		)
Cash and due from banks	31,944							29,610
Premises and equipment, net	35,751							34,400
Bank-owned life insurance	40,419							35,894
Deferred tax asset	52,932							—
Goodwill	18,851							—
Accrued interest and other assets	24,208							16,897
Total assets	$	1,594,591						$	1,307,841


Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	626,127		392		0.13	%	$	517,319		348		0.14	%
Savings deposits	71,512			11		0.03	%	42,049			11		0.05	%
Time deposits	160,541			502		0.63	%	128,595			594		0.93	%
Other borrowings	4,464			6		0.27	%	62,939			934		2.99	%
Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense	862,644			911		0.21	%	750,902			1,887		0.51	%
Demand deposits	485,451							391,524
Other liabilities	27,068							21,859
Total liabilities	1,375,163							1,164,285
Stockholders' equity	219,428							143,556
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,594,591						$	1,307,841

Net interest income				$	27,405						$	23,090

Net interest spread						3.83	%						3.63	%

Net interest income to earning assets						3.91	%						3.83	%


(1)	Average non-performing loans included in the computation of average loans for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $7.3 million and $15.3 million, respectively.


(2)	Loan related fees, including prepayment penalties, recognized during the period and included in the yield calculation totaled approximately $1.2 million in 2014 and $1.0 million in 2013.


(3)	Includes loans held for sale.

Analysis of Changes in Interest Income and Expense

The following table shows the dollar amount of increase (decrease) in the Company’s consolidated interest income and expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and attributes such variance to “volume” or “rate” changes (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014 over 2013
	Total Increase			Amount of Change Attributed to
	(Decrease)			Volume			Rate
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	3,214		$	3,691		$	(477	)
Interest on investment securities	639			482			157
Other investment income	(21		)	(23		)	2
Total interest income	3,832			4,150			(318		)

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits:
Interest bearing demand	35			63			(28		)
Savings	1			6			(5		)
Time deposits	58			115			(57		)
Other borrowings	(459		)	(445		)	(14		)
Total interest expense	(365		)	(261		)	(104		)

Net interest income	$	4,197		$	4,411		$	(214	)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014 over 2013
	Total Increase			Amount of Change Attributed to
	(Decrease)			Volume			Rate
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	2,725		$	5,214		$	(2,489	)
Interest on investment securities	645			151			494
Other investment income	(31		)	(35		)	4
Total interest income	3,339			5,330			(1,991		)

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits:
Interest bearing demand	44			73			(29		)
Savings	—			8			(8		)
Time deposits	(92		)	148			(240		)
Other borrowings	(928		)	(868		)	(60		)
Total interest expense	(976		)	(639		)	(337		)

Net interest income	$	4,315		$	5,969		$	(1,654	)

Loan Loss Provision

The Company did not record a loan loss provision during the second quarter of 2014. The Company recorded a loan loss provision of $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2013.

Net charge-offs in the second quarter of 2014 were $1.3 million compared to net charge-offs of $2.9 million in the second quarter of 2013 primarily in the commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loan categories. At June 30, 2014, the reserve for loan losses was $20.5 million, or 1.47%, of outstanding loans compared to $20.9 million, or 2.08%, of outstanding loans at December 31, 2013.

The Bank maintains pooled and impaired loan reserves with additional consideration of qualitative factors and unallocated reserves in reaching its determination of the total reserve for loan losses. The level of reserves is subject to review by the Bank’s regulatory authorities who may require adjustments to the reserve based on their evaluation and opinion of economic and industry factors as well as specific loans in the portfolio. For further discussion, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in this report and “Loan Portfolio and Credit Quality” in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There can be no assurance that the reserve for credit losses will be sufficient to cover actual loan-related losses.

The reserve for unfunded lending commitments was $0.4 million at June 30, 2014, which remained unchanged from December 31, 2013.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income was as follows for the periods presented below (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014		Three Months Ended June 30, 2013		% Change		Six Months Ended June 30, 2014		Six Months Ended June 30, 2013		% Change
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	1,114	$	744	49.7	%	$	1,867	$	1,479	26.2	%
Card issuer and merchant services fees, net	1,595		875		82.3	%	2,596		1,626		59.7	%
Earnings on BOLI	249		224		11.2	%	432		435		(0.7	)%
Mortgage banking income, net	622		1,060		(41.3	)%	1,056		2,220		(52.4	)%
Swap fee income	617		—		—	%	943		—		—	%
Other income	617		613		0.7	%	1,272		1,112		14.4	%
Total non-interest income	$	4,814	$	3,516	36.9	%	$	8,166	$	6,872	18.8	%

Overall, the increase in non-interest income in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 was related to inclusion of earnings on assets acquired in the Merger for approximately half of the second quarter of 2014.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, service charges on deposit accounts and cash issuer and merchant service fees increased 49.7% and 82.3%, respectively, compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The increase was mainly related to the addition of Home customer transaction volumes for banking services. Increases in year-to-date revenues over the same period in 2013 were also attributable to the same.

Net mortgage banking income decreased in the three and six month period ended June 30, 2014 compared to the three and six month period ended June 30, 2013, mainly due to lower residential mortgage origination volumes and related gains on sales. Home did not have a mortgage banking portfolio, as a result, this change is attributable to Cascade only.

Customer interest rate swap fee income was $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2014, bringing the year-to-date swap fee income to $0.9 million. The customer swap product offering was initiated in late 2013.

Other income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 was relatively stable compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense was as follows for the periods presented below (dollars in thousands):



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2014		Three Months Ended June 30, 2013			% Change		Six Months Ended June 30, 2014		Six Months Ended June 30, 2013		% Change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	13,746	$	8,960		53.4	%	$	21,389	$	16,607	28.8	%
Occupancy	4,851		1,573			208.4	%	5,991		2,728		119.6	%
Information Technology	1,815		658			175.8	%	2,602		1,234		110.9	%
Equipment	629		367			71.4	%	966		735		31.4	%
Communications	562		395			42.3	%	945		761		24.2	%
FDIC insurance	454		404			12.4	%	686		849		(19.2	)%
OREO	710		(2		)	(35,600.0	)%	702		275		155.3	%
Professional services	3,851		829			364.5	%	5,183		1,510		243.2	%
Prepayment penalties on FHLB advances	—		3,827			(100.0	)%	—		3,827		(100.0	)%
Other expenses	3,607		2,298			57.0	%	5,611		4,094		37.1	%
Total non-interest expense	$	30,225	$	19,309		56.5	%	$	44,075	$	32,620	35.1	%

Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2014 was $30.2 million compared to $19.3 million for the second quarter of 2013. Non-interest expense in the second quarter of 2014 includes Home’s operating expenses incurred since the Acquisition Date, as well as $9.9 million in acquisition related costs and $2.4 million of other items. Acquisition expenses are related to severance, branch consolidation costs, contract termination payments, disposal of excess equipment, and professional and legal services rendered in connection with the acquisition. Other items include charges related to occupancy and certain incentive plan accruals in the period.

Non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $44.1 million and $32.6 million, respectively. Year-to-date 2014 acquisition related costs were $10.8 million which is included in the results reported.

Total salaries and benefits increased 53.4% from June 30, 2014 compared to June 30, 2013. The increases relate to the inclusion of Home employees since the Acquisition Date as well as severance costs for employees who were not retained with the Company and certain incentive plan accruals in the reported periods.

Information technology for the second quarter of 2014 increased over the same period in 2013, due primarily to merger related expenses including additional cost for our core service provider.

Occupancy, equipment and communications expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 increased $3.7 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013 primarily related to the effect of an increase in number of branches resulting from the Home acquisition. The increase includes costs of closing and expected disposition of certain Cascade branches that were consolidated into former Home locations.

FDIC insurance declined for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. This decrease was mainly due to reduced monetary assessments by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as a result of the Bank's improved financial condition.

OREO expenses increased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, mainly as a result of loss on the disposition of OREO properties in the second quarter of 2014.

Professional services increased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, due primarily to merger related expenses.

Other expenses increased in the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same periods in 2013 mainly as a result of expenses related the inclusion of expenses related to Home's former operations incurred since the Acquisition Date.

Income Taxes

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $4.8 million compared to a $51.8 million income tax benefit during the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $5.1

million and $51.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in the income tax benefit in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 due primarily to the result of an income tax benefit of $51.7 million being recorded in the second quarter of 2013 as a result of releasing the valuation allowance against the Company's DTA.

As of June 30, 2014, the net deferred tax asset was $70.0 million. Included in the net deferred taxes are net operating losses (tax affected) for federal taxes of $30.7 million, Oregon state taxes of $3.1 million and Idaho state taxes of $2.7 million. Also included in the net deferred taxes are federal and state tax credits of $1.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. This is compared with a deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2013 of $50.1 million. The increase relates primarily to the inclusion of Home deferred tax assets acquired in the Merger.

In assessing the Company's ability to utilize its deferred tax asset or “DTA”, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the DTA will not be realized. The ultimate realization of DTA is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the nature and amount of historical and projected future taxable income, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and available tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The amount of deferred taxes recognized could be impacted by changes to any of these variables.

The Company reversed its DTA valuation allowance as of June 30, 2013 due to management’s determination that it was more likely than not that a significant portion of the Company's DTA would be realized. Management’s determination resulted from consideration of both the positive and negative evidence available that can be objectively verified. For a full discussion of the Company’s considerations, see "Deferred Income Taxes” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Financial Condition

Stockholders Equity and Capital Resources

Total stockholders’ equity increased to $306.9 million at June 30, 2014, as compared to total stockholders’ equity of $188.7 million at December 31, 2013. The increase in total stockholders' equity was primarily due to merger of Home and increased equity through the issuance of stock options. At June 30, 2014, the total common equity to total assets ratio was 13.4% and the Company’s basic book value per share was $4.25 as compared to the total common equity to total assets ratio of 13.4% and basic book value per share of $3.97 at December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, Bancorp’s Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based capital and total risk-based capital ratios were 9.81%, 10.59% and 11.84%, respectively, and the Bank’s Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based capital and total risk-based capital ratios were 9.50%, 10.25% and 11.50%, respectively, which meet regulatory benchmarks for a “well-capitalized” designation. Regulatory benchmarks for a “well-capitalized” designation are 5.00%, 6.00%, and 10.00% for Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based capital and total risk-based capital, respectively. Additional information regarding capital requirements can be found in Note 12 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Tier 1 leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 capital by average assets. Average assets for the second quarter of 2014 includes the addition of Home's assets from Acquisition Date to the end of the quarter. Going forward, average assets will be of the merged companies for the whole period.

From time to time the Company makes commitments to acquire banking properties or to make equipment or technology related investments of capital. At June 30, 2014, the Company had no material capital expenditure commitments apart from those incurred in the ordinary course of business.

Total Assets and Liabilities

Total assets were $2.3 billion at June 30, 2014, up $882.2 million from December 31, 2013. The increase in total assets during the period ended June 30, 2014 primarily resulted from the acquisition of Home and acquired assets at fair value of $946.1 million. Overall, cash and cash equivalents increased $82.4 million, mainly due to the increased deposits at fair value from Home of $760.6 million, partially offset by the acquisition of investments at a fair value of $318.9 million and loans at a fair value of $392.3 million.

Total liabilities were $2.0 billion at June 30, 2014, a $764.0 million increase from December 31, 2013. This was primarily the result of an increase of $774.7 million in total deposits, of which $760.6 million was the fair value of deposits acquired from Home, which was partially offset by a $27.0 million reduction in FHLB borrowings.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table summarizes the Bank’s off-balance sheet commitments at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):



	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Commitments to extend credit	$	363,390	$	245,906
Commitments under credit card lines of credit	26,007		24,321
Standby letters of credit	2,716		2,161

Total off-balance sheet financial instruments	$	392,113	$	272,388

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the customer contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of fees. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Bank applies established credit standards and underwriting practices in evaluating the creditworthiness of such obligors and related collateral requirements, if any. Collateral held for commitments varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, residential real estate and income-producing commercial properties. The Bank typically does not obtain collateral related to credit card commitments.

Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. These guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third-party, the Bank would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Bank could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. If the commitment were funded, the Bank would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. The Bank’s policies generally require that standby letter of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those involved in extending loans to customers. The credit risk involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

The increase in commitments to extend credit from the balance at December 31, 2013 to the balance at June 30, 2014 was primarily related to the acquisition of Home.

Other than those commitments discussed above, there are no other obligations or liabilities of the Company arising from its off-balance sheet arrangements that are or are reasonably likely to become material. In addition, the Company knows of no event, demand, commitment, trend or uncertainty that will result in or is reasonably likely to result in the termination or material reduction in availability of the off-balance sheet arrangements. The Company had no material off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Liquidity and Sources of Funds

The objective of the Bank’s liquidity management is to maintain sufficient cash flows to meet obligations for depositor withdrawals, to fund the borrowing needs of loan customers, and to fund ongoing operations. At June 30, 2014, liquid assets of the Bank were mainly interest bearing balances held at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ("FRB") totaling $101.2 million compared to $39.5 million at December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily the result of increased deposits related to the acquisition of Home.

Core relationship deposits are the Bank’s primary source of funds. As such, the Bank focuses on deposit relationships with local business and consumer clients who maintain multiple accounts and services at the Bank. The Company views such deposits as the foundation of its long-term liquidity because it believes such core deposits are more stable and less sensitive to changing interest rates and other economic factors compared to large time deposits or wholesale purchased funds. The Bank’s customer relationship strategy has resulted in a relatively higher percentage of its deposits being held in checking and money market accounts, and a lesser percentage in time deposits.

The Bank augments core deposits with wholesale funds from time to time. Until the cease-and-desist order (the "Order") between the Bank and the FDIC and the Oregon Division of Finance and Corporate Securities was terminated on March 7, 2013, the Bank

was restricted under the terms of the Order from accepting or renewing brokered deposits. Upon termination of the Order, the Bank was permitted to accept local relationship-based reciprocal Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service, or "CDARS" and Demand Deposit Marketplace, or "DDM" deposits. These deposits are technically classified as brokered deposits. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $4.6 million and $21.7 million in reciprocal CDARS, respectively, and no reciprocal DDM deposits.

The Bank accepts public fund deposits in Oregon and Idaho and follows rules imposed by state authorities. Current rules imposed by the Oregon State Treasury require that the Bank collateralize 50% of the uninsured public funds of Oregon entities held by the Bank. At June 30, 2014, the Bank was in compliance with this requirement. Currently there are no collateral requirements set on Idaho public deposits.

The Bank also utilizes borrowings and lines of credit as sources of funds. At June 30, 2014, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle, or "FHLB" had extended the Bank a secured line of credit of $274.4 million (20.00% of total assets) accessible for short or long-term borrowings given sufficient qualifying collateral. As of June 30, 2014, the Bank had qualifying collateral pledged for FHLB borrowings totaling $339.1 million of which the Bank had nothing outstanding. At June 30, 2014, the Bank also had undrawn borrowing capacity at FRB of $16.6 million supported by specific qualifying collateral. Borrowing capacity from FHLB or FRB may fluctuate based upon the acceptability and risk rating of loan collateral, and counterparties could adjust discount rates applied to such collateral at their discretion. Also, FRB or FHLB could restrict or limit our access to secured borrowings. Correspondent banks have extended $90.0 million in unsecured or collateralized short-term lines of credit for the purchase of federal funds. At June 30, 2014, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under these federal fund borrowing agreements.

Liquidity may be affected by the Bank’s routine commitments to extend credit. At June 30, 2014, the Bank had $392.1 million in total outstanding commitments to extend credit, compared to $272.4 million at year-end 2013. At this time, management believes that the Bank’s available resources will be sufficient to fund its commitments in the normal course of business.

The investment portfolio also provides a secondary source of funds as investments may be pledged for borrowings or sold for cash. This liquidity is limited, however, by counterparties’ willingness to accept securities as collateral and the market value of securities at the time of sale could result in a loss to the Bank. As of June 30, 2014, the book value of unpledged investments totaled $251.9 million compared to $24.4 million at December 31, 2013, the increase of which came from the acquired investments from Home that were mostly unpledged.

Bancorp is a single bank holding company and its primary ongoing source of liquidity is dividends received from the Bank. Oregon banking laws impose certain limitations on the payment of dividends by Oregon state chartered banks. The amount of the dividend may not be greater than the Bank’s unreserved retained earnings, deducting from that, to the extent not already charged against earnings or reflected in a reserve, the following: (1) all bad debts, which are debts on which interest is past due and unpaid for at least six months, unless the debt is fully secured and in the process of collection; (2) all other assets charged off as required by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services or a state or federal examiner; and (3) all accrued expenses, interest and taxes of the institution.

Inflation

The effect of changing prices on financial institutions is typically different than on non-banking companies since virtually all of a bank’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. In particular, interest rates are significantly affected by inflation, but neither the timing nor magnitude of the changes are directly related to price level indices; therefore, the Company can best counter inflation over the long term by managing net interest income and controlling net increases in noninterest income and expenses.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required to provide the information called for by Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedure

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the risk factors related to the recently completed Merger state below, you should carefully consider the factors previously disclosed in Part I – Item 1A Risk Factors of Cascade’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2014 for the year ended December 31, 2013. These factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position, and could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except for the updated risk factors described below, there have been no material changes to Cascade’s risk factors described in our Form 10-K. The information below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, Cascade’s risk factors and information disclosed in our Form 10-K.

We have a deferred tax asset position of $70.0 million at June 30, 2014 and we are required to assess the recoverability of this asset on an ongoing basis.

Deferred tax assets are evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if they are expected to be recoverable in the future. Our evaluation considers positive and negative evidence to assess whether it is more likely than not that a portion of the asset will not be realized. The risk of a valuation allowance increases if continuing operating losses are incurred. Future negative operating performance or other negative evidence may result in a valuation allowance being recorded against some or all of the deferred tax asset. A valuation allowance on our deferred tax asset could have a material adverse impact on our capital and results of operations.

The market price of Cascade common stock after the Merger may be affected by factors different from those historically affecting the shares of Cascade or Home.

Upon completion of the Merger, holders of Home common stock became holders of 24,309,131 shares of Cascade common stock. Cascade’s business differs in important respects from that of Home, and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of Cascade common stock may be affected by factors different from those that affected the results of Cascade’s operations prior to the Merger.

Combining the two companies may be more difficult, costly or time consuming than expected and the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Merger may not be realized.

Cascade and Home operated independently prior to completion of the Merger on May 16, 2014. The success of the Merger, including anticipated benefits and cost savings, will depend, in part, on Cascade’s ability to successfully combine and integrate the businesses of Cascade and Home. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of Cascade’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the Cascade’s ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Merger. If Cascade experiences difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. As with any Merger of financial

institutions, there also may be business disruptions that cause the Bank to lose customers or cause customers to remove their accounts from the Bank and move their business to competing financial institutions. Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert management attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial results and the value of its common stock.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a)-(b) Not applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a) Not applicable.

(b) There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may nominate directors to the Company’s board of directors.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			CASCADE BANCORP (Registrant)
Date	August 14, 2014	By	/s/ Terry E. Zink
			Terry E. Zink, President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date	August 14, 2014	By	/s/ Gregory D. Newton
			Gregory D. Newton, EVP & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer)