Edgar Filing: GALLAGHER ARTHUR J & CO

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

☐	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-09761

ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE		36-2151613
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Two Pierce Place Itasca, Illinois		60143-3141
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (630) 773-3800

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange

on which registered

Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒.

Note: Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒.

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last reported price at which the registrant’s common equity was sold on June 30, 2016 (the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $7,533,668,000.

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $1.00 par value, as of January 31, 2017 was 178,617,000.

Documents incorporated by reference:

Portions of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.’s definitive 2017 Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K in response to Part III to the extent described herein.

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

Index


		Page No.
Part I.

Item 1.	Business		2-10

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		10-22

Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		22

Item 2.	Properties		22

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		22

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		. 22

Executive Officers			23

Part II.

Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		23-24

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		25

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		26-55

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk		55-56

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		57-104

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		105

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		105

Item 9B.	Other Information		105

Part III.

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		105

Item 11.	Executive Compensation		105

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		105

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		106

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services		106

Part IV.

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		106-109

Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary		109

Signatures			110

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts			111

Exhibit Index			112

Part I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as we, our, us or Gallagher, are engaged in providing insurance brokerage and consulting services and third party claims settlement and administration services to both domestic and international entities. We believe that our major strength is our ability to deliver comprehensively structured insurance, risk management and consulting services to our clients. Our brokers, agents and administrators act as intermediaries between insurers and their customers.

Since our founding in 1927, we have grown from a one-person agency to the world’s fourth largest insurance broker based on revenues, according to Business Insurance magazine’s July 18, 2016 edition, and one of the world’s largest property/casualty third party claims administrators, according to Business Insurance magazine’s March 24, 2016 edition. We have three reportable segments: brokerage, risk management and corporate, which contributed approximately 63%, 13% and 24%, respectively, to 2016 revenues. We generate approximately 69% of our revenues from the combined brokerage and risk management segments domestically, with the remaining 31% derived internationally, primarily in Australia, Bermuda, Canada, the Caribbean, New Zealand and the United Kingdom (U.K.). Substantially all of the revenues of the corporate segment are generated in the United States (U.S.).

Shares of our common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol AJG, and we had a market capitalization at December 31, 2016 of approximately $9.3 billion. Information in this report is as of December 31, 2016 unless otherwise noted. We were reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1972. Our executive offices are located at Two Pierce Place, Itasca, Illinois 60143-3141, and our telephone number is (630) 773-3800.

Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains certain statements related to future results, or states our intentions, beliefs and expectations or predictions for the future, which are forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations or forecasts of future events. Such statements use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “contemplate,” “forecast,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “potential,” and other similar terms, and future or conditional tense verbs like “could,” “may,” “might,” “see,” “should,” “will” and “would.” You can also identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. For example, we may use forward-looking statements when addressing topics such as: market and industry conditions, including competitive and pricing trends; acquisition strategy; the expected impact of acquisitions and dispositions; the development and performance of our services and products; changes in the composition or level of our revenues or earnings; our cost structure and the outcome of cost-saving or restructuring initiatives; future capital expenditures; future debt levels; future debt to earnings ratios; the outcome of contingencies; dividend policy; pension obligations; cash flow and liquidity; capital structure and financial losses; future actions by regulators; the outcome of existing regulatory actions, investigations, reviews or litigation; the impact of changes in accounting rules; financial markets; interest rates; foreign exchange rates; matters relating to our operations; income taxes; expectations regarding our investments, including our clean energy investments; the financial impact of retention agreements in our international brokerage operations; and integrating recent acquisitions. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from either historical or anticipated results depending on a variety of factors.

Potential factors that could impact results include:

•

Failure to successfully and cost-effectively integrate recently acquired businesses and their operations or fully realize synergies from such acquisitions in the expected time frame;

•

Volatility or declines in premiums or other adverse trends in the insurance industry;

•

An economic downturn;

•

Competitive pressures in each of our businesses;

•

Risks that could negatively affect the success of our acquisition strategy, including continuing consolidation in our industry and growing interest in acquiring insurance brokers on the part of private equity firms, which could make it more difficult to identify targets and could make them more expensive; the risk that we may not receive timely regulatory approval of desired transactions; execution risks; integration risks; the risk of post-acquisition deterioration leading to intangible asset impairment charges; and the risk we could incur or assume unanticipated regulatory liabilities such as those relating to violations of anti-corruption and sanctions laws;

•

Our failure to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel;

•

Risks arising from our growing international operations, including the risks posed by political and economic uncertainty in certain countries (such as the risks posed by protectionist local governments and underdeveloped or evolving legal systems), risks related to maintaining regulatory and legal compliance across multiple jurisdictions (such as those relating to violations of anti-corruption, sanctions and privacy laws), and risks arising from the complexity of managing businesses across different time zones, geographies, cultures and legal regimes;

•

Risks particular to our risk management segment, including any slowing of the trend toward outsourcing claims administration, and of the concentration of large amounts of revenue with certain clients;

•

The lower level of predictability inherent in contingent and supplemental commissions versus standard commissions;

•

Sustained increases in the cost of employee benefits;

•

Our failure to apply technology effectively in driving value for our clients through technology-based solutions, or failure to gain internal efficiencies and effective internal controls through the application of technology and related tools;

•

Our inability to recover successfully should we experience a disaster, cybersecurity attack or other significant disruption to business continuity;

•

Damage to our reputation;

•

Our failure to comply with regulatory requirements, including those related to governance and control requirements in particular jurisdictions, international sanctions, or a change in regulations or enforcement policies that adversely affects our operations (for example, relating to insurance broker compensation methods or the failure of state and local governments to follow through on agreed-upon income tax credits or other related incentives relating to our planned new corporate headquarters);

•

Violations or alleged violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 or other anti-corruption laws and the Foreign Account Tax Compliance provisions of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act, (which we refer to as FATCA);

•

The outcome of any existing or future investigation, review, regulatory action or litigation;

•

Our failure to adapt our services to changes resulting from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act;

•

Unfavorable determinations related to contingencies and legal proceedings;

•

Improper disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary data;

•

Significant changes in foreign exchange rates;

•

Changes in our accounting estimates and assumptions (including as a result of the new revenue recognition standard);

•

Risks related to our clean energy investments, including the risk of intellectual property claims, utilities switching from coal to natural gas, environmental and product liability claims, and environmental compliance costs;

•

Disallowance of Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as IRC) Section 29 or IRC Section 45 tax credits;

•

The risk that our outstanding debt adversely affects our financial flexibility and restrictions and limitations in the agreements and instruments governing our debt;

•

The risk we may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions from subsidiaries;

•

The risk of share ownership dilution when we issue common stock as consideration for acquisitions and for other reasons;

•

Volatility of the price of our common stock;

•

Risks related to the outcome of the U.S. congressional elections and the new administration; and

•

Risks related to the vote in the U.K. to leave the European Union.

Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of, and are based on information available to us on, the date of the applicable document. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to update any such statements or release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risk factors referred to above. Our future performance and actual results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our ability to control or predict. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date that they are made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information about factors that could materially affect us, including our results of operations and financial condition, is contained in the “Risk Factors” section in Part I, Item 1A of this report.

Operating Segments

We report our results in three segments: brokerage, risk management and corporate. The major sources of our operating revenues are commissions, fees and supplemental and contingent commissions from brokerage operations, and fees from risk management operations. Information with respect to all sources of revenue, by segment, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, is as follows (in millions):


	2016					2015					2014
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
Brokerage
Commissions	$	2,439.1		43	%	$	2,338.7		44	%	$	2,083.0		45	%
Fees		775.7		14	%		705.8		13	%		577.0		12	%
Supplemental commissions		147.0		3	%		125.5		2	%		104.0		2	%
Contingent commissions		107.2		2	%		93.7		2	%		84.7		2	%
Investment income and other		58.9		1	%		60.3		1	%		47.6		1	%

		3,527.9		63	%		3,324.0		62	%		2,896.3		62	%

Risk Management
Fees		717.1		13	%		726.5		13	%		681.3		15	%
Investment income		1.0		—	%		0.6		—	%		1.0		—	%

		718.1		13	%		727.1		13	%		682.3		15	%

Corporate
Clean energy and other investment income		1,348.8		24	%		1,341.3		25	%		1,047.9		23	%

Total revenues	$	5,594.8		100	%	$	5,392.4		100	%	$	4,626.5		100	%

See Note 20 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for additional financial information, including earnings before income taxes and identifiable assets by segment for 2016, 2015 and 2014.

Our business, particularly our brokerage business, is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Commission and fee revenues, and the related brokerage and marketing expenses, can vary from quarter to quarter as a result of the timing of policy inception dates and the timing of receipt of information from insurance carriers. On the other hand, salaries and employee benefits, rent, depreciation and amortization expenses generally tend to be more uniform throughout the year. The timing of acquisitions, recognition of books of business gains and losses and the variability in the recognition of IRC Section 45 tax credits also impact the trends in our quarterly operating results. See Note 19 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for unaudited quarterly operating results for 2016 and 2015.

Brokerage Segment

The brokerage segment accounted for 63% of our revenues in 2016. Our brokerage segment is primarily comprised of retail and wholesale insurance brokerage operations. Our retail brokerage operations negotiate and place property/casualty, employer-provided health and welfare insurance, and healthcare exchange and retirement solutions principally for middle-market commercial, industrial, public entity, religious and not-for-profit entities. Many of our retail brokerage customers choose to place their insurance with insurance underwriters, while others choose to use alternative vehicles such as self-insurance pools, risk retention groups or captive insurance companies. Our wholesale brokerage operations assist our brokers and other unaffiliated brokers and agents in the placement of specialized, unique and hard-to-place insurance programs.

Our primary sources of compensation for our retail brokerage services are commissions paid by insurance companies, which are usually based upon either a percentage of the premium paid by insureds, or brokerage and advisory fees paid directly by our clients. For wholesale brokerage services, we generally receive a share of the commission paid to the retail broker from the insurer. Commission rates are dependent on a number of factors, including the type of insurance, the particular insurance company underwriting the policy and whether we act as a retail or wholesale broker. Advisory fees are dependent on the extent and value of the services we provide. In addition, under certain circumstances, both retail brokerage and wholesale brokerage services receive supplemental and contingent commissions. A supplemental commission is a commission paid by an insurance carrier that is above the base commission paid, is determined by the insurance carrier and is established annually in advance of the contractual period based on historical performance criteria. A contingent commission is a commission paid by an insurance carrier based on the overall profit and/or the overall volume of business placed with that insurance carrier during a particular calendar year and is determined after the contractual period.

We operate our brokerage operations through a network of more than 600 sales and service offices located throughout the U.S. and in 32 other countries. Most of these offices are fully staffed with sales and service personnel. We offer client-service capabilities in more than 150 countries around the world through a network of correspondent brokers and consultants.

Retail Insurance Brokerage Operations

Our retail insurance brokerage operations accounted for 83% of our brokerage segment revenues in 2016. Our retail brokerage operations place nearly all lines of commercial property/casualty and health and welfare insurance coverage. Significant lines of insurance coverage and consultant capabilities are as follows:


Aviation	Disability	General Liability	Products Liability
Casualty	Earthquake	Health & Welfare	Professional Liability
Claims Advocacy	Errors & Omissions	Healthcare Analytics	Property
Commercial Auto	Exchange Solutions	Human Resources	Retirement
Compensation	Executive Benefits	Institutional Investment	Surety Bond
Cyber Liability	Fiduciary Services	Loss Control	Voluntary Benefits
Dental	Fine Arts	Marine	Wind
Directors & Officers Liability	Fire	Medical	Workers’ Compensation

Our retail brokerage operations are organized into more than 520 office locations primarily located in the U.S., Australia, Canada, the Caribbean, New Zealand and the U.K., and operate within certain key niche/practice groups, which account for approximately 73% of our retail brokerage revenues. These specialized teams target areas of business and/or industries in which we have developed a depth of expertise and a large client base. Significant niche/practice groups we serve are as follows:


Affinity	Food/Agribusiness	Life Solutions	Real Estate
Automotive	Global Risks	Manufacturing	Religious/Not-for-Profit
Aviation & Aerospace	Healthcare	Marine	Restaurant
Construction	Higher Education	Mining	Scholastic
Energy	Hospitality	Personal	Technology/Telecom
Entertainment	Insolvency	Private Equity	Trade Credit/Political Risk
Environmental	Law Firms	Professional Groups	Transportation
Financial Institutions	Life Sciences	Public Entity

Our specialized focus on these niche/practice groups allows for highly-focused marketing efforts and facilitates the development of value-added products and services specific to those industries or business segments. We believe that our detailed understanding and broad client contacts within these niche/practice groups provide us with a competitive advantage.

We anticipate that our retail brokerage operations’ greatest revenue growth over the next several years will continue to come from:

•

Mergers and acquisitions;

•

Our niche/practice groups and middle-market accounts;

•

Cross-selling other brokerage products to existing customers; and

•

Developing and managing alternative market mechanisms such as captives, rent-a-captives and deductible plans/self-insurance.

Wholesale Insurance Brokerage Operations

Our wholesale insurance brokerage operations accounted for 17% of our brokerage segment revenues in 2016. Our wholesale brokers assist our retail brokers and other non-affiliated brokers in the placement of specialized and hard-to-place insurance. These brokers operate through more than 80 office locations primarily located across the U.S., Bermuda and through our approved Lloyd’s of London brokerage operation. In certain cases we act as a brokerage wholesaler and in other cases we act as a managing general agent or managing general underwriter distributing specialized insurance coverages for insurance carriers. Managing general agents and managing general underwriters are agents authorized by an insurance company to manage all or a part of the insurer’s business in a specific geographic territory. Activities they perform on behalf of the insurer may include marketing, underwriting (although we do not assume any underwriting risk), issuing policies, collecting premiums, appointing and supervising other agents, paying claims and negotiating reinsurance.

More than 75% of our wholesale brokerage revenues come from non-affiliated brokerage customers. Based on revenues, our domestic wholesale brokerage operation ranked as one of the largest domestic managing general agents/underwriting managers/wholesale brokers/Lloyds coverholders according to Business Insurance magazine’s October 24, 2016 edition.

We anticipate growing our wholesale brokerage operations by increasing the number of broker-clients, developing new managing general agency and underwriter programs, and through mergers and acquisitions.

Risk Management Segment

Our risk management segment accounted for 13% of our revenues in 2016. Our risk management segment provides contract claim settlement and administration services for enterprises that choose to self-insure some or all of their property/casualty coverages and for insurance companies that choose to outsource some or all of their property/casualty claims departments. Approximately 68% of our risk management segment’s revenues are from workers’ compensation-related claims, 28% are from general and commercial auto liability-related claims and 4% are from property-related claims. In addition, we generate revenues from integrated disability management (employee absence management) programs, information services, risk control consulting (loss control) services and appraisal services, either individually or in combination with arising claims. Revenues for risk management services are comprised of fees generally negotiated in advance on a per-claim or per-service basis, depending upon the type and estimated volume of the services to be performed.

Risk management services are primarily marketed directly to Fortune 1000 companies, larger middle-market companies, not-for-profit organizations and public entities on an independent basis from our brokerage operations. We manage our third party claims adjusting operations through a network of more than 110 offices located throughout the U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the U.K. Most of these offices are fully staffed with claims adjusters and other service personnel. Our adjusters and service personnel act solely on behalf and under the instruction of our clients and customers.

While this segment complements our insurance brokerage offerings, more than 90% of our risk management segment’s revenues come from customers not affiliated with our brokerage operations, such as insurance companies and clients of other insurance brokers. Based on revenues, our risk management operation ranked as one of the world’s largest property/casualty third-party claims administrators according to Business Insurance magazine’s March 24, 2016 edition.

We expect that the risk management segment’s most significant growth prospects through the next several years will come from:

•

Increased levels of business with Fortune 1000 companies;

•

Larger middle-market companies, captives;

•

Program business and the outsourcing of insurance company claims departments; and

•

Mergers and acquisitions.

Corporate Segment

The corporate segment accounted for 24% of our revenues in 2016. The corporate segment reports the financial information related to our debt, clean energy investments, external acquisition-related expenses and other corporate costs. The revenues reported by this segment in 2016 resulted almost solely from our consolidation of refined fuel operations, of which we control and own more than 50% of those operations. At December 31, 2016, significant investments managed by this segment include:

Clean Coal-Related Ventures

We have a 46.5% interest in Chem-Mod LLC (Chem-Mod), a privately-held enterprise that has commercialized multi-pollutant reduction technologies to reduce mercury, sulfur dioxide and other emissions at coal-fired power plants. We also have a 12.0% interest in a privately-held start-up enterprise, C-Quest Technology LLC, which owns technologies that reduce carbon dioxide emissions created by burning fossil fuels.

Tax-Advantaged Investments

In 2009 and 2011, we built a total of 29 commercial clean coal production plants to produce refined coal using Chem-Mod’s proprietary technologies and in 2013, we purchased a 99% interest in a limited liability company that has ownership interests in four limited liability companies that own five commercial clean coal production plants. We believe these operations produce refined coal that qualifies for tax credits under IRC Section 45. The law that provides for IRC Section 45 tax credits substantially expires in December 2019 for the fourteen plants we built and placed in service in 2009 (2009 Era Plants) and in December 2021 for the fifteen plants we built and placed in service in 2011, plus the five plants we purchased interests in that were placed in service in 2011 (2011 Era Plants).

International Operations

Our total revenues by geographic area for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 were as follows (in millions):


	2016					2015					2014
	Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total			Amount		% of Total
Brokerage and risk management segments
United States	$	2,944.6		69	%	$	2,713.9		68	%	$	2,405.9		68	%
United Kingdom		712.1		17	%		766.9		19	%		726.2		20	%
Australia		245.5		6	%		256.7		6	%		236.6		7	%
Canada		138.2		3	%		136.6		3	%		85.0		2	%
New Zealand		125.9		3	%		122.6		3	%		81.3		2	%
Other foreign		79.7		2	%		54.4		1	%		43.6		1	%

Total brokerage and risk management		4,246.0		100	%		4,051.1		100	%		3,578.6		100	%

Corporate segment, substantially all United States		1,348.8					1,341.3					1,047.9

Total revenues	$	5,594.8				$	5,392.4				$	4,626.5

Total revenues generated by our U.K. and Australian based operations decreased in 2016 compared to 2015 due to unfavorable foreign currency translation. See Notes 6, 17 and 20 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for additional financial information related to our foreign operations, including goodwill allocation, earnings before income taxes and identifiable assets, by segment, for 2016, 2015 and 2014.

International and Other Brokerage Related Operations

The majority of our international brokerage operations are in Australia, Bermuda, Canada, the Caribbean, New Zealand and the U.K., targeting small to medium enterprise risks.

We operate primarily as a retail commercial property and casualty broker throughout more than 35 locations in Australia, 35 locations in Canada and 25 locations in New Zealand. In the U.K., we operate as a retail broker from approximately 100 locations. We also have an underwriting operation for clients to access Lloyd’s of London and other international insurance markets, and a program operation offering customized risk management products and services to U.K. public entities.

In Bermuda, we act principally as a wholesaler for clients looking to access the Bermuda insurance markets and also provide services relating to the formation and management of offshore captive insurance companies.

We also have strategic brokerage alliances with a variety of independent brokers in countries where we do not have a local office presence. Through this global network of correspondent insurance brokers and consultants, we are able to fully serve our clients’ coverage and service needs in more than 150 countries around the world.

Captive insurance companies - We have ownership interests in several insurance and reinsurance companies based in the U.S., Bermuda, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Isle of Man and Malta that primarily operate segregated account “rent-a-captive” facilities. These “rent-a-captive” facilities enable our clients to receive the benefits of owning a captive insurance company without incurring certain disadvantages of ownership. Captive insurance companies, or “rent-a-captive” facilities, are created for clients to insure their risks and capture any underwriting profit and investment income, which would then be available for use by the insureds, generally to reduce future costs of their insurance programs. In general, these companies are set up as protected cell companies that are comprised of separate cell business units (which we refer to as Captive Cells) and the core regulated company (which we refer to as the Core Company). The Core Company is owned and operated by us and no insurance policies are assumed by the Core Company. All insurance is assumed or written within individual Captive Cells. Only the activity of the supporting Core Company of the rent-a-captive facility is recorded in our consolidated financial statements, including cash and stockholder’s equity of the legal entity and any expenses incurred to operate the rent-a-captive facility. Most Captive Cells reinsure individual lines of insurance coverage from external insurance companies. In addition, some Captive Cells offer individual lines of insurance coverage from one of our insurance company subsidiaries. The different types of insurance coverage include special property, general liability, products liability, medical professional liability, other liability and medical stop loss. The policies are generally claims-made. Insurance policies are written by an insurance company and the risk is assumed by each of the Captive Cells. In general, we structure these operations to have no underwriting risk on a net written basis. In situations where we have assumed underwriting risk on a net written basis, we have managed that exposure by obtaining full collateral for the underwriting risk we have assumed from our clients. We typically require pledged assets including cash and/or investment accounts or letters of credit to limit our risk.

We have a wholly owned insurance company subsidiary based in the U.S. that cedes all of its insurance risk to reinsurers or captives under facultative and quota-share treaty reinsurance agreements. These reinsurance arrangements diversify our business and minimize our exposure to losses or hazards of an unusual nature. The ceding of insurance does not discharge us of our primary liability to the policyholder. In the event that all or any of the reinsuring companies are unable to meet their obligations, we would be liable for such defaulted amounts. Therefore, we are subject to credit risk with respect to the obligations of our reinsurers or captives. In order to minimize our exposure to losses from reinsurer credit risk and insolvencies, we have managed that exposure by obtaining full collateral for which we typically require pledged assets, including cash and/or investment accounts or letters of credit, to fully offset the risk. See Note 16 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for additional financial information related to the insurance activity of our wholly owned insurance company subsidiary for 2016, 2015 and 2014.

International Risk Management Operations

Our international risk management operations are principally in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the U.K. Services are similar to those provided in the U.S. and are provided primarily on behalf of commercial and public entity clients.

See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for information regarding risks attendant to these foreign operations.

Markets and Marketing

We manage our brokerage operations through a network of more than 600 sales and service offices located throughout the U.S. and in 32 other countries. We manage our third party claims adjusting operations through a network of more than 110 offices located throughout the U.S., Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the U.K. Our customer base is highly diversified and includes commercial, industrial, public entity, religious and not-for-profit entities. No material part of our business depends upon a single customer or on a few customers. The loss of any one customer would not have a material adverse effect on our operations. In 2016, our largest single customer accounted for approximately 1% of our revenues from the combined brokerage and risk management segments and our ten largest customers represented 3% of our revenues from the combined brokerage and risk management segments in the aggregate. Our revenues are geographically diversified, with both domestic and international operations.

Each of our retail and wholesale brokerage operations has a small market-share position and, as a result, we believe has substantial organic growth potential. In addition, each of our retail and wholesale brokerage operations has the ability to grow through the acquisition of small- to medium-sized independent brokerages. See “Business Combinations” below.

While historically we have generally grown our risk management segment organically, and we expect to continue to do so, from time to time we consider acquisitions for this segment.

We require our employees serving in sales or marketing capacities, plus all of our executive officers, to enter into agreements with us restricting disclosure of confidential information and solicitation of our clients and prospects upon their termination of employment. The confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions of such agreements terminate in the event of a hostile change in control, as defined in the agreements.

Competition

Brokerage Segment

According to Business Insurance magazine’s July 18, 2016 edition, we were the world’s fourth largest insurance broker based on revenues. The insurance brokerage and service business is highly competitive and there are many insurance brokerage and service organizations and individuals throughout the world who actively compete with us in every area of our business.

Our retail and wholesale brokerage operations compete globally with Aon plc, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company, each of which has greater worldwide revenues than us. In addition, various other competing firms, such as Jardine Lloyd Thomson Group plc, Wells Fargo Insurance Services, Inc., Brown & Brown Inc., Hub International Ltd., Lockton Companies, Inc. and USI Holdings Corporation, operate globally or nationally or are strong in a particular region or locality and may have, in that region or locality, an office with revenues as large as or larger than those of our corresponding local office. We believe that the primary factors determining our competitive position with other organizations in our industry are the quality of the services we render and the overall costs to our clients. In addition, for health/welfare products and benefit consultant services, we compete with larger firms such as Aon Hewitt, Mercer (a subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.), Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company; mid-market firms such as Lockton, USI Holdings, and Wells Fargo and the benefits consulting divisions of the national public accounting firms, as well as a vast number of local and regional brokerages and agencies.

Our wholesale brokerage and binding operations compete with large wholesalers such as CRC Insurance Services, Inc., RT Specialty, AmWINS Group, Inc., as well as a vast number of local and regional wholesalers.

We also compete with certain insurance companies that write insurance directly for their customers. Government benefits relating to health, disability, and retirement are also alternatives to private insurance and indirectly compete with us.

Risk Management Segment

Our risk management operation currently ranks as one of the world’s largest property/casualty third party claims administrators based on revenues, according to Business Insurance magazine’s March 24, 2016 edition. While many global and regional claims administrators operate within this space, we compete directly with Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Broadspire Services, Inc. (a subsidiary of Crawford & Company), ESIS (a subsidiary of Chubb Limited) and CorVel. Several large insurance companies, such as Travelers and Liberty Mutual, also maintain their own claims administration units, which can be strong competitors. In addition, we compete with various smaller third party claims administrators on a regional level. We believe that the primary factors determining our competitive position are reputation for outstanding service and the ability to resolve customers’ losses in the most cost-efficient manner possible.

Regulation

We are required to be licensed or receive regulatory approval in nearly every state and foreign jurisdiction in which we do business. In addition, most jurisdictions require individuals who engage in brokerage, claim adjusting and certain other insurance service activities to be personally licensed. These licensing laws and regulations vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In most jurisdictions, licensing laws and regulations generally grant broad discretion to supervisory authorities to adopt and amend regulations and to supervise regulated activities.

Business Combinations

We completed and integrated 420 acquisitions from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2016, almost exclusively within our brokerage segment. The majority of these acquisitions have been smaller regional or local property/casualty retail or wholesale operations with a strong middle-market client focus or significant expertise in one of our niche/practice groups. Over the last decade, we have also increased our acquisition activity in the retail employee benefits brokerage and wholesale brokerage areas. The total purchase price for individual acquisitions has typically ranged from $1.0 million to $50.0 million, although in 2014 we completed three large acquisitions with an aggregate purchase price consideration in excess of $1.7 billion.

Through acquisitions, we seek to expand our talent pool, enhance our geographic presence and service capabilities, and/or broaden and further diversify our business mix. We also focus on identifying:

•

A corporate culture that matches our sales-oriented culture;

•

A profitable, growing business whose ability to compete would be enhanced by gaining access to our greater resources; and

•

Clearly defined financial criteria.

See Note 3 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for a summary of our 2016 acquisitions, the amount and form of the consideration paid and the dates of acquisition.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately 24,800 employees. We continuously review benefits and other matters of interest to our employees and consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.

Available Information

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available free of charge on our website at www.ajg.com as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports may also be read and copied at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at (800) SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that includes our reports, proxy statements and other information.

Disclosure pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act

In our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters of 2016, we disclosed certain activities required to be reported under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, and such disclosures are incorporated herein by reference. In the fourth quarter of 2016, our U.K. domiciled subsidiary, Arthur J. Gallagher (UK) Limited (AJGUK), acted as insurance broker and advised clients in obtaining insurance coverage for activities related to Iran’s oil, gas and petroleum industries. AJGUK assisted clients in obtaining insurance, reinsurance and retrocession coverage for a variety of activities in Iran, including insurance coverage for:

•

The supply of crude oil to and from Iran;

•

The transport and storage of oil from Iran;

•

The shipment of heavy fuel oil to and from Iran;

•

The docking and loading of oil shipments in Iran;

•

The operation of vessels providing support services to offshore oil platforms that supply oil to Iran; and

•

Other closely related activities pertaining to the supply and transportation of oil to and from Iran.

On January 16, 2016, the U.S. lifted the nuclear-related “secondary sanctions” imposed against Iran. In connection with this event, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General License H, which authorizes U.S.-owned or U.S.-controlled foreign entities to engage in certain transactions involving Iran that would otherwise be prohibited by section 560.215 of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations.

The activities described above were conducted in full compliance with General License H. AJGUK generated total gross revenue of approximately $1,718 (in actual dollars) and net profit of approximately $309 (in actual dollars) from these activities.

AJGUK intends to continue acting as an insurance broker in connection with insurance coverages authorized by General License H.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risks Relating to our Business Generally

An overall economic downturn, as well as unstable economic conditions in the countries and regions in which we operate, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

An overall decline in economic activity could adversely impact us in future years as a result of reductions in the overall amount of insurance coverage that our clients purchase due to reductions in their headcount, payroll, properties, and the market values of assets, among other factors. Such reductions could also adversely impact future commission revenues when the carriers perform exposure audits if they lead to subsequent downward premium adjustments. We record the income effects of subsequent premium adjustments when the adjustments become known and, as a result, any improvement in our results of operations and financial condition may lag an improvement in the economy. In addition, some of our clients may experience liquidity problems or other financial difficulties in the event of a prolonged deterioration in the economy, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. If our clients become financially less stable, enter bankruptcy, liquidate their operations or consolidate, our revenues and collectability of receivables could be adversely affected. Our growing operations in countries and regions undergoing economic downturns, particularly in the U.K., Australia and certain emerging markets, expose us to risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, some of our clients may experience liquidity problems or other financial difficulties in the event of a prolonged deterioration in the economy, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. For example, approximately 20% of our brokerage segment and approximately 3% of our risk management segment revenues came from the U.K. in 2016. In a referendum held on June 23, 2016, a majority of voters in the U.K. voted in favor of the U.K. leaving the European Union. This vote to leave has created significant uncertainty regarding the U.K. economic outlook, and could lead to a decline in economic activity, a recession, or reduced future growth prospects in the U.K., any of which could damage our clients’ confidence and materially and adversely affect our business.

Economic conditions that result in financial difficulties for insurance companies or reduced insurer capacity could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We have a significant amount of trade accounts receivable from some of the insurance companies with which we place insurance. If those insurance companies experience liquidity problems or other financial difficulties, we could encounter delays or defaults in payments owed to us, which could have a significant adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. The failure of an insurer with whom we place business could result in errors and omissions claims against us by our clients, and the failure of errors and omissions insurance carriers could make the errors and omissions insurance we rely upon cost prohibitive or unavailable, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if carriers merge or if a large carrier fails or withdraws from offering certain lines of coverage, overall underwriting capacity could be negatively affected, which could reduce our ability to place certain lines of coverage and, as a result, reduce our revenues and profitability.

Volatility or declines in premiums or other adverse trends in the insurance industry may seriously undermine our profitability.

We derive much of our revenue from commissions and fees for our brokerage services. We do not determine the insurance premiums on which our commissions are generally based. Moreover, insurance premiums are cyclical in nature and may vary widely based on market conditions. Because of market cycles for insurance product pricing, which we cannot predict or control, our brokerage revenues and profitability can be volatile or remain depressed for significant periods of time.

As traditional risk-bearing insurance companies continue to outsource the production of premium revenue to non-affiliated brokers or agents such as us, those insurance companies may seek to further minimize their expenses by reducing the commission rates payable to insurance agents or brokers. The reduction of these commission rates, along with general volatility and/or declines in premiums, may significantly affect our profitability. Because we do not determine the timing or extent of premium pricing changes, it is difficult to precisely forecast our commission revenues, including whether they will significantly decline. As a result, we may have to adjust our budgets for future acquisitions, capital expenditures, dividend payments, loan repayments and other expenditures to account for unexpected changes in revenues, and any decreases in premium rates may adversely affect the results of our operations.

In addition, there have been and may continue to be various trends in the insurance industry toward alternative insurance markets including, among other things, greater levels of self-insurance, captives, rent-a-captives, risk retention groups and non-insurance capital markets-based solutions to traditional insurance. While, historically, we have been able to participate in certain of these activities on behalf of our customers and obtain fee revenue for such services, there can be no assurance that we will realize revenues and profitability as favorable as those realized from our traditional brokerage activities. Our ability to generate premium-based commission revenue may also be challenged by the growing desire of some clients to compensate brokers based upon flat fees rather than variable commission rates. This could negatively impact us because fees are generally not indexed for inflation and do not automatically increase with premium as does commission-based compensation.

Contingent and supplemental commissions we receive from insurance companies are less predictable than standard commissions, and any decrease in the amount of these kinds of commissions we receive could adversely affect our results of operations.

A portion of our revenues consists of contingent and supplemental commissions we receive from insurance companies. Contingent commissions are paid by insurance companies based upon the profitability, volume and/or growth of the business placed with such companies during the prior year. Supplemental commissions are commissions paid by insurance companies that are established annually in advance based on historical performance criteria. If, due to the current economic environment or for any other reason, we are unable to meet insurance companies’ profitability, volume or growth thresholds, or insurance companies increase their estimate of loss reserves (over which we have no control), actual contingent commissions or supplemental commissions we receive could be less than anticipated, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We face significant competitive pressures in each of our businesses.

The insurance brokerage and service business is highly competitive and many insurance brokerage and service organizations actively compete with us in one or more areas of our business around the world. We compete with three firms in the global risk management and brokerage markets, which have revenues significantly larger than ours. In addition, various other competing firms that operate nationally or that are strong in a particular country, region or locality may have, in that country, region or locality, an office with revenues as large as or larger than those of our corresponding local office. Our third party claims administration operation also faces significant competition from stand-alone firms as well as divisions of larger firms.

The primary factors in determining our competitive position with other organizations in our industry are the quality of the services rendered and the overall costs to our clients. Losing business to competitors offering similar products at lower prices or having other competitive advantages would adversely affect our business.

In addition, any increase in competition due to new legislative or industry developments could adversely affect us. These developments include:

•

Increased capital-raising by insurance underwriting companies, which could result in new capital in the industry, which in turn may lead to lower insurance premiums and commissions;

•

Insurance companies selling insurance directly to insureds without the involvement of a broker or other intermediary;

•

Changes in our business compensation model as a result of regulatory developments;

•

Federal and state governments establishing programs to provide health insurance or, in certain cases, property insurance in catastrophe-prone areas or other alternative market types of coverage, that compete with, or completely replace, insurance products offered by insurance carriers; and

•

Increased competition from new market participants such as banks, accounting firms, consulting firms and Internet or other technology firms offering risk management or insurance brokerage services, or new distribution channels for insurance such as payroll firms.

New competition as a result of these or other competitive or industry developments could cause the demand for our products and services to decrease, which could in turn adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to apply technology effectively in driving value for our clients through technology-based solutions or gain internal efficiencies and effective internal controls through the application of technology and related tools, our operating results, client relationships, growth and compliance programs could be adversely affected.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to the threat of digital disruption and other technology change. We must also develop and implement technology solutions and technical expertise among our employees that anticipate and keep pace with rapid and continuing changes in technology, industry standards, client preferences and internal control standards. We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these developments on a timely and cost-effective basis and our ideas may not be accepted in the marketplace. Additionally, the effort to gain technological expertise and develop new technologies in our business requires us to incur significant expenses. If we cannot offer new technologies as quickly as our competitors, or if our competitors develop more cost-effective technologies or product offerings, we could experience a material adverse effect on our operating results, client relationships, growth and compliance programs.

In some cases, we depend on key vendors and partners to provide technology and other support for our strategic initiatives. If these third parties fail to perform their obligations or cease to work with us, our ability to execute on our strategic initiatives could be adversely affected.

Damage to our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our reputation is one of our key assets. We advise our clients on and provide services related to a wide range of subjects and our ability to attract and retain clients is highly dependent upon the external perceptions of our level of service, trustworthiness, business practices, financial condition and other subjective qualities. Negative perceptions or publicity regarding these or other matters, including our association with clients or business partners who themselves have a damaged reputation, or from actual or alleged conduct by us or our employees, could damage our reputation. Any resulting erosion of trust and confidence among existing and potential clients, regulators, stockholders and other parties important to the success of our business could make it difficult for us to attract new clients and maintain existing ones, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have historically acquired large numbers of insurance brokers, benefits consulting firms and risk management firms. We may not be able to continue such an acquisition strategy in the future and there are risks associated with such acquisitions, which could adversely affect our growth and results of operations.

Our acquisition program has been an important part of our historical growth, particularly in our brokerage segment, and we believe that similar acquisition activity will be important to maintaining comparable growth in the future. Failure to successfully identify and complete acquisitions likely would result in us achieving slower growth. Continuing consolidation in our industry and growing interest in acquiring insurance brokers on the part of private equity firms and private equity-backed consolidators could make it more difficult for us to identify appropriate targets and could make them more expensive. Even if we are able to identify appropriate acquisition targets, we may not have sufficient capital to fund acquisitions, be able to execute transactions on favorable terms or integrate targets in a manner that allows us to realize the benefits we have historically experienced from acquisitions. When regulatory approval of acquisitions is required, our ability to complete acquisitions may be limited by an ongoing regulatory review or other issues with the relevant regulator. Our ability to finance and integrate acquisitions may also decrease if we complete a greater number of large acquisitions than we have historically.

Post-acquisition risks include those relating to retention of personnel, retention of clients, entry into unfamiliar markets or lines of business, contingencies or liabilities, such as violations of sanctions laws or anti-corruption laws including the FCPA and U.K. Bribery Act, risks relating to ensuring compliance with licensing and regulatory requirements, tax and accounting issues, the risk that the acquisition distracts management and personnel from our existing business, and integration difficulties relating to accounting, information technology, human resources, or organizational culture and fit, some or all of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and growth. The failure of acquisition targets to achieve anticipated revenue and earnings levels could also result in goodwill impairment charges.

We own interests in firms where we do not exercise management control (such as Jiang Tai Re, our joint venture with Jiang Tai Insurance Brokers in China, or Casanueva Perez S.A.P. de C.V. (Grupo CP) in Mexico) and are therefore unable to direct or manage the business to realize the anticipated benefits, including mitigation of risks, that could be achieved through full integration.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain experienced and qualified personnel.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain both new talent and experienced personnel, including our senior management, brokers and other key personnel. In addition, we could be adversely affected if we fail to adequately plan for the succession of members of our senior management team. The insurance brokerage industry has experienced intense competition for the services of leading brokers, and in the past we have lost key brokers and groups of brokers, along with their client and business relationships, to competitors. Such departures could lead to the loss of clients and intellectual property. The loss of our chief executive officer or any of our other senior managers, brokers or other key personnel (including the key personnel that manage our interests in our IRC Section 45 investments), or our inability to identify, recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our substantial operations outside the U.S. expose us to risks different than those we face in the U.S.

In 2016, we generated approximately 31% of our revenues outside the U.S., including in countries where the risk of political and economic uncertainty is relatively greater than that present in the U.S. and more stable countries. The global nature of our business creates operational and economic risks. Adverse geopolitical or economic conditions may temporarily or permanently disrupt our operations in these countries or create difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations. For example, we have substantial operations in India to provide certain back-office services. To date, the dispute between India and Pakistan involving the Kashmir region, incidents of terrorism in India and general geopolitical uncertainties have not adversely affected our operations in India. However, such factors could potentially affect our operations there in the future. Should our access to these services be disrupted, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Operating outside the U.S. may also present other risks that are different from, or greater than, the risks we face doing comparable business in the U.S. These include, among others, risks relating to:

•

Maintaining awareness of and complying with a wide variety of labor practices and foreign laws, including those relating to export and import duties, environmental policies and privacy issues, as well as laws and regulations applicable to U.S. business operations abroad. These and other international regulatory risks are described below under “Regulatory, Legal and Accounting Risks;”

•

The potential costs, difficulties and risks associated with local regulations across the globe, including the risk of personal liability for directors and officers and “piercing the corporate veil” risks under the corporate law regimes of certain countries;

•

Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

•

Less flexible employee relationships, which may limit our ability to prohibit employees from competing with us after they are no longer employed with us or recovering damages in the event they do so, and may make it more difficult and expensive to terminate their employment;

•

Political and economic instability, including in the U.K., the Eurozone, Australia and certain emerging markets (including risks relating to undeveloped or evolving legal systems, unstable governments, acts of terrorism and outbreaks of war);

•

Coordinating our communications and logistics across geographic distances and multiple time zones, including during times of crisis management;

•

Adverse trade policies, and adverse changes to any of the policies of the U.S. or any of the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate;

•

Unfavorable audits and exposure to additional liabilities relating to various non-income taxes (such as payroll, sales, use, value-added, net worth, property and goods and services taxes) in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, our future effective tax rates could be unfavorably affected by changes in tax rates, discriminatory or confiscatory taxation, changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, changes in tax laws or their interpretation and the financial results of our international subsidiaries. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development issued reports and recommendations as part of its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project (BEPS), and in response many countries in which we do business are expected to adopt rules which may change various aspects of the existing framework under which our tax obligations are determined. For example, in response to BEPS, the U.K. adopted rules in 2016 that will affect the deductibility of interest paid on intercompany debt, and other jurisdictions where we operate, including Australia and New Zealand, may do so as well in the near future;

•

Legal or political constraints on our ability to maintain or increase prices;

•

Cash balances held in foreign banks and institutions where governments have not specifically enacted formal guarantee programs;

•

Lost business or other financial harm due to governmental actions affecting the flow of goods, services and currency, including protectionist policies that discriminate in favor of local competitors; and

•

Governmental restrictions on the transfer of funds to us from our operations outside the U.S.

Following the recent presidential election in the U.S., the foreign and international trade policies of the U.S. could change in ways that exacerbate the risks described above, or introduce new risks for our international operations. If any of these risks materialize, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Significant changes in foreign exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations.

A large and growing portion of our business is located outside the U.S. Some of our foreign subsidiaries receive revenues or incur obligations in currencies that differ from their functional currencies. We must also translate the financial results of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars. Although we have used foreign currency hedging strategies in the past and currently have some in place, such risks cannot be eliminated entirely, and significant changes in exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations. In the U.K., the vote to leave the European Union may result in substantial volatility in foreign exchange markets and may lead to a sustained weakness in the British pound’s exchange rate against the U.S. dollar. Any significant weakening of the British pound to the U.S. dollar will have an adverse impact on our brokerage and risk management segment revenues and earnings as reported in U.S. dollars.

We face a variety of risks in our third party claims administration operations that are distinct from those we face in our brokerage operations.

Our third party claims administration operations face a variety of risks distinct from those faced by our brokerage operations, including the risks that:

•

The favorable trend among both insurers and insureds toward outsourcing various types of claims administration and risk management services will reverse or slow, causing our revenues or revenue growth to decline;

•

Concentration of large amounts of revenue with certain clients results in greater exposure to the potential negative effects of lost business due to changes in management at such clients or changes in state government policies, in the case of our government-entity clients, or for other reasons;

•

Contracting terms will become less favorable or that the margins on our services will decrease due to increased competition, regulatory constraints or other developments;

•

We will not be able to satisfy regulatory requirements related to third party administrators or that regulatory developments (including unanticipated regulatory developments relating to security and data privacy outside the U.S.) will impose additional burdens, costs or business restrictions that make our business less profitable;

•

Economic weakness or a slow-down in economic activity could lead to a reduction in the number of claims we process;

•

If we do not control our labor and technology costs, we may be unable to remain competitive in the marketplace and profitably fulfill our existing contracts (other than those that provide cost-plus or other margin protection);

•

We may be unable to develop further efficiencies in our claims-handling business and may be unable to obtain or retain certain clients if we fail to make adequate improvements in technology or operations; and

•

Insurance companies or certain insurance consumers may create in-house servicing capabilities that compete with our third party administration and other administration, servicing and risk management products.

If any of these risks materialize, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Sustained increases in the cost of employee benefits could reduce our profitability.

The cost of current employees’ medical and other benefits, as well as pension retirement benefits and postretirement medical benefits under our legacy defined benefit plans, substantially affects our profitability. In the past, we have occasionally experienced significant increases in these costs as a result of macro-economic factors beyond our control, including increases in health care costs, declines in investment returns on pension assets and changes in discount rates used to calculate pension and related liabilities. A significant decrease in the value of our defined benefit pension plan assets or decreases in the interest rates used to discount the pension plans’ liabilities could cause an increase in pension plan costs in future years. Although we have actively sought to control increases in these costs, we can make no assurance that we will succeed in limiting future cost increases, and continued upward pressure in these costs could reduce our profitability.

Our inability to recover successfully should we experience a disaster, cybersecurity attack or other disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations, damage our reputation and impact client relationships.

Our ability to conduct business may be adversely affected, even in the short-term, by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports our business and the communities where we are located. For example, our third party claims administration operation is highly dependent on the continued and efficient functioning of RISX-FACS^®, our proprietary risk management information system, to provide clients with insurance claim settlement and administration services.

Disruptions could be caused by, among other things, restricted physical site access, terrorist activities, disease pandemics, cybersecurity attacks, or outages to electrical, communications or other services we use, our employees or third parties with whom we conduct business. We have disaster recovery procedures in place and insurance to protect against such contingencies. However, such procedures may not be effective and any insurance or recovery procedures may not continue to be available at reasonable prices and may not address all such losses or compensate us for the possible loss of clients or increase in claims and lawsuits directed against us because of any period during which we are unable to provide services. We anticipate moving our corporate headquarters during the first quarter of 2017. Any major disruption in the move, or our inability to successfully recover should we experience a disaster or other disruption to business continuity could have a material adverse effect on our operations. The occurrence of such events could also cause reputational harm and damage our client relationships.

Regulatory, Legal and Accounting Risks

Improper disclosure of confidential, personal or proprietary data, whether due to human error, misuse of information by employees or vendors, or as a result of cyberattacks, could result in regulatory scrutiny, legal liability or reputational harm, and could have an adverse effect on our business or operations.

We maintain confidential, personal and proprietary information relating to our company, our employees and our clients. This information includes personally identifiable information, protected health information and financial information. In many jurisdictions, particularly in the U.S. and the European Union, we are subject to laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, security and transfer of this information. These laws apply to transfers of information among our affiliates, as well as to transactions we enter into with third party vendors.

We have from time to time experienced cybersecurity breaches, such as computer viruses, unauthorized parties gaining access to our information technology systems and similar incidents, which to date have not had a material impact on our business. In the future, these types of incidents could disrupt the security of our internal systems and business applications, impair our ability to provide services to our clients and protect the privacy of their data, compromise confidential business information, result in intellectual property or other confidential information being lost or stolen, including client, employee or company data, which could harm our competitive position or otherwise adversely affect our business. Cyber threats are constantly evolving, which makes it more difficult to detect cybersecurity incidents, assess their severity or impact in a timely manner, and successfully defend against them.

We maintain policies, procedures and technical safeguards designed to protect the security and privacy of confidential, personal and proprietary information. Nonetheless, we cannot eliminate the risk of human error or inadequate safeguards against employee or vendor malfeasance. It is possible that the steps we follow, including our security controls over personal data and training of employees on data security, may not prevent improper access to, disclosure of, or misuse of confidential, personal or proprietary information. This could cause harm to our reputation, create legal exposure, or subject us to liability under laws that protect personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue.

Significant costs are involved with maintaining system safeguards for our technology infrastructure. If we are unable to effectively maintain and upgrade our system safeguards, including in connection with the integration of acquisitions, we may incur unexpected costs and certain of our systems may become more vulnerable to unauthorized access.

With respect to our commercial arrangements with third party vendors, we have processes designed to require third party IT outsourcing, offsite storage and other vendors to agree to maintain certain standards with respect to the storage, protection and transfer of confidential, personal and proprietary information. However, we remain at risk of a data breach due to the intentional or unintentional non-compliance by a vendor’s employee or agent, the breakdown of a vendor’s data protection processes, or a cyber attack on a vendor’s information systems.

Data privacy is subject to frequently changing laws, rules and regulations in the various jurisdictions and countries in which we operate. For example, in 2015, the European Court of Justice invalidated a key safe harbor relied upon by many businesses to transfer personal data legally from the European Union to the U.S. There is a growing body of international data protection law, which, in part, includes security breach notification obligations, more stringent operational requirements and significant penalties for non-compliance. In addition, legislators in the U.S. are proposing new and more robust cybersecurity legislation in light of the recent broad-based cyberattacks at a number of companies. These and similar initiatives around the world could increase the cost of developing, implementing or securing our servers and require us to allocate more resources to improved technologies, adding to our IT and compliance costs. Our failure to adhere to, or successfully implement processes in response to, changing legal or regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or damage to our reputation in the marketplace.

We are subject to regulation worldwide. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if regulations change in a way that adversely affects our operations, we may not be able to conduct our business, or we may be less profitable.

Many of our activities throughout the world are subject to regulatory supervision and regulations promulgated by bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in the U.S., the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the U.K., the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in Australia and insurance regulators in nearly every jurisdiction in which we operate. Our activities are also subject to a variety of other laws, rules and regulations addressing licensing, data privacy, wage-and-hour standards, employment and labor relations, anti-competition, anti-corruption, currency, reserves and the amount of local investment with respect to our operations in certain countries. This regulatory supervision could reduce our profitability or growth by increasing the costs of compliance, restricting the products or services we sell, the markets we enter, the methods by which we sell our products and services, or the prices we can charge for our services and the form of compensation we can accept from our clients, carriers and third parties. As our operations grow around the world, it is increasingly difficult to monitor and enforce regulatory compliance across the organization. A compliance failure by even one of our smallest branches could lead to litigation and/or disciplinary actions that may include compensating clients for loss, the imposition of penalties and the revocation of our authorization to operate. In all such cases, we would also likely incur significant internal investigation costs and legal fees.

The global nature of our operations increases the complexity and cost of compliance with laws and regulations, including increased staffing needs, the development of new policies, procedures and internal controls and providing training to employees in multiple locations, adding to our cost of doing business. Many of these laws and regulations may have differing or conflicting legal standards across jurisdictions, increasing further the complexity and cost of compliance. In emerging markets and other jurisdictions with less developed legal systems, local laws and regulations may not be established with sufficiently clear and reliable guidance to provide us with adequate assurance that we are aware of all necessary licenses to operate our business, that we are operating our business in a compliant manner, or that our rights are otherwise protected. In addition, in light of recent events associated with the planned exit of the U.K. from the European Union, we will likely face new regulatory costs and challenges. For example, our U.K. operations could lose their European Union financial services passport which provides them the license to operate across borders within the single European Union market without obtaining local regulatory approval.

Changes in legislation or regulations and actions by regulators, including changes in administration and enforcement policies, could from time to time require operational changes that could result in lost revenues or higher costs or hinder our ability to operate our business.

For example, the method by which insurance brokers are compensated has received substantial scrutiny in the past because of the potential for conflicts of interest. The potential for conflicts of interest arises when a broker is compensated by two parties in connection with the same or similar transactions. The vast majority of the compensation we receive for our work as insurance brokers is in the form of retail commissions and fees. We receive additional revenue from insurance companies, separate from retail commissions and fees, including, among other things, contingent and supplemental commissions and payments for consulting and analytics services provided to insurance carriers. Future changes in the regulatory environment may impact our ability to collect these additional revenue streams. Adverse regulatory, legal or other developments regarding these revenues could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition, expose us to negative publicity and reputational damage and harm our client, insurer or other relationships.

We could be adversely affected by violations or alleged violations of laws that impose requirements for the conduct of our overseas operations, including the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act or other anti-corruption laws, sanctioned parties restrictions, and FATCA.

In foreign countries where we operate, a risk exists that our employees, third party partners or agents could engage in business practices prohibited by applicable laws and regulations, such as the FCPA and the U.K. Bribery Act. Such anti-corruption laws generally prohibit companies from making improper payments to foreign officials and require companies to keep accurate books and records and maintain appropriate internal controls. Our policies mandate strict compliance with such laws and we devote substantial resources to programs to ensure compliance. However, we operate in some parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption, and, in certain circumstances, local customs and practice might not be consistent with the requirements of anti-corruption laws. In addition, in recent years, two of the five publicly traded insurance brokerage firms were investigated in the U.S. and the U.K. for improper payments to foreign officials. These firms undertook internal investigations and paid significant settlements.

We remain subject to the risk that our employees, third party partners or agents will engage in business practices that are prohibited by our policies and violate such laws and regulations. Violations by us or a third party acting on our behalf could result in significant internal investigation costs and legal fees, civil and criminal penalties, including prohibitions on the conduct of our business, and reputational harm.

We may also be subject to legal liability and reputational damage if we violate U.S. trade sanctions administered by OFAC, the European Union and the United Nations, and trade sanction laws such as the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012.

In addition, FATCA requires certain of our subsidiaries, affiliates and other entities to obtain valid FATCA documentation from payees prior to remitting certain payments to such payees. In the event we do not obtain valid FATCA documents, we may be obliged to withhold a portion of such payments. This obligation is shared with our customers and clients who may fail to comply, in whole or in part. In such circumstances, we may incur FATCA compliance costs including withholding taxes, interest and penalties. In addition, regulatory initiatives and changes in the regulations and guidance promulgated under FATCA may increase our costs of operations, and could adversely affect the market for our services as intermediaries, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business could be negatively impacted if we are unable to adapt our services to changes resulting from the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation.

The 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation, among other things, increases the level of regulatory complexity for companies that offer health and welfare benefits to their employees, and continues to be amended through regulations issued by various government agencies. Initiatives by the incoming presidential administration to change certain aspects of this legislation may increase such complexity. Many clients of our brokerage segment purchase health and welfare products for their employees and, therefore, are impacted by the 2010 Health Care Reform Legislation. We have made significant investments in product and knowledge development to assist clients as they navigate the complex requirements of this legislation. Depending on future changes to health legislation, these investments may not yield returns. In addition, if we are unable to adapt our services to changes resulting from this law and any subsequent regulations, our ability to grow our business or to provide effective services, particularly in our employee benefits consulting business, will be negatively impacted. In addition, if our clients reduce the role or extent of employer sponsored health care in response to this or any other law, our results of operations could be adversely impacted.

We are subject to a number of contingencies and legal proceedings which, if determined unfavorably to us, would adversely affect our financial results.

We are subject to numerous claims, tax assessments, lawsuits and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Such claims, lawsuits and other proceedings could, for example, include claims for damages based on allegations that our employees or sub-agents improperly failed to procure coverage, report claims on behalf of clients, provide insurance companies with complete and accurate information relating to the risks being insured, or provide clients with appropriate consulting, advisory and claims handling services. There is the risk that our employees or sub-agents may fail to appropriately apply funds that we hold for our clients on a fiduciary basis. Certain of our benefits and retirement consultants provide investment advice or decision-making services to clients. If these clients experience investment losses, our reputation could be damaged and our financial results could be negatively affected as a result of claims asserted against us and lost business. We have established provisions against these potential matters that we believe are adequate in light of current information and legal advice, and we adjust such provisions from time to time based on current material developments. The damages claimed in such matters are or may be substantial, including, in many instances, claims for punitive, treble or other extraordinary damages. It is possible that, if the outcomes of these contingencies and legal proceedings were not favorable to us, it could materially adversely affect our future financial results. In addition, our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity may be adversely affected if, in the future, our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or we experience an increase in liabilities for which we self-insure. We have purchased errors and omissions insurance and other insurance to provide protection against losses that arise in such matters. Accruals for these items, net of insurance receivables, when applicable, have been provided to the extent that losses are deemed probable and are reasonably estimable. These accruals and receivables are adjusted from time to time as current developments warrant.

As more fully described in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements, we are a defendant in various legal actions incidental to our business, including but not limited to matters related to employment practices, alleged breaches of non-compete or other restrictive covenants, theft of trade secrets, breaches of fiduciary duties, intellectual property infringement and related causes of action. We are also periodically the subject of inquiries and investigations by regulatory and taxing authorities into various matters related to our business. For example, our micro-captive advisory services are currently the subject of an investigation by the IRS. In addition, we were named in a lawsuit asserting that we, our subsidiary, Gallagher Clean Energy, LLC, and Chem-Mod LLC are liable for infringement of a patent held by Nalco Company. An adverse outcome in connection with one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition in any given quarterly or annual period, or on an ongoing basis. In addition, regardless of any eventual monetary costs, any such matter could expose us to negative publicity, reputational damage, harm to our client or employee relationships, or diversion of personnel and management resources, which could adversely affect our ability to recruit quality brokers and other significant employees to our business, and otherwise adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in our accounting estimates and assumptions could negatively affect our financial position and operating results.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (which we refer to as GAAP). These accounting principles require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. We are also required to make certain judgments that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each reporting period. We periodically evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those relating to the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, investments (including our IRC Section 45 investments), income taxes, stock-based compensation, claims handling obligations, retirement plans, litigation and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable based on specific circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Additionally, changes in accounting standards (such as new standards relating to revenue recognition and leases) could increase costs to the organization and could have an adverse impact on our future financial position and results of operations. See Note 2 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for information with respect to the potential impacts the new standards relating to revenue recognition and leases could have on our future financial position and operating results.

Risks Relating to our Investments, Debt and Common Stock

Our clean energy investments are subject to various risks and uncertainties.

We have invested in clean energy operations capable of producing refined coal that we believe qualify for tax credits under IRC Section 45.

See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of these investments. Our ability to generate returns and avoid write-offs in connection with these investments is subject to various risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties set forth below.

•

Availability of the tax credits under IRC Section 45. Our ability to claim tax credits under IRC Section 45 depends upon the operations in which we have invested satisfying certain ongoing conditions set forth in IRC Section 45. These include, among others, the emissions reduction, “qualifying technology”, “placed-in-service” and coal sales to unrelated parties requirements of IRC Section 45, as well as the requirement that at least one of the operations’ owners qualifies as a “producer” of refined coal. While we have received some degree of confirmation from the IRS relating to our ability to claim these tax credits, the IRS could ultimately determine that the operations have not satisfied, or have not continued to satisfy, the conditions set forth in IRC Section 45.

•

Value of the tax credits. The value of the tax credits could be impacted by changes in the tax code as a result of the recent presidential and congressional elections in the U.S. Congress could modify or repeal IRC Section 45 and remove the tax credits (either prospectively or through the elimination of the carryover of the credits), which might adversely affect the value of our investment. Also, if Congress reduces tax rates as proposed, although we would pay less in taxes overall, it would reduce the tax benefit of operating costs associated with the production of refined coal.

•

Co-investor tax credit risks. We have co-investors in several of the operations currently producing refined coal, and are working to negotiate arrangements with potential co-investors for the purchase of equity stakes in other operations. If no satisfactory arrangements can be reached with these potential co-investors, or if in the future any one of our co-investors leaves a project, we could have difficulty finding replacements in a timely manner. On February 10, 2017, one of the refined coal partnerships in which we are an investor received a notice from the IRS setting forth its view that certain of our co-investors are unable to claim tax credits based on the structure of their partnership interests. The IRS notice does not challenge the validity of the tax credits or our ability to utilize tax credits. Our co-investors have the right to appeal and defend their position in tax court. While it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of any such appeal, an adverse ruling would likely make it more difficult for us to reach satisfactory arrangements with new co-investors. We could also be subject to claims against us from the co-investors affected by this IRS notice.

•

Operational risks. Chem-Mod’s multi-pollutant reduction technologies (The Chem-Mod^TM Solution) require chemicals that may not be readily available in the marketplace at reasonable costs. Utilities that use the technologies could be idled for various reasons, including operational or environmental problems at the plants or in the boilers, disruptions in the supply or transportation of coal, revocation of their Chem-Mod technologies environmental permits, labor strikes, force majeure events such as hurricanes, or terrorist attacks, any of which could halt or impede the operations. Long-term operations using Chem-Mod’s multi-pollutant reduction technologies could also lead to unforeseen technical or other problems not evident in the short- or medium-term. A serious injury or death of a worker connected with the production of refined coal using Chem-Mod’s technologies could expose the operations to material liabilities, jeopardizing our investment, and could lead to reputational harm. In the event of any such operational problems, we may not be able to take full advantage of the tax credits. We could also be exposed to risk due to our lack of control over the operations if future developments, for example a regulatory change affecting public and private companies differently, causes our interests and those of our co-investors to diverge. Finally, our partners responsible for operation and management could fail to run the operations in compliance with IRC Section 45. If any of these developments occur, our investment returns may be negatively impacted.

•

Market demand for coal. When the price of natural gas and/or oil declines relative to that of coal, some utilities may choose to burn natural gas or oil instead of coal. Market demand for coal may also decline as a result of an economic slowdown or mild weather and a corresponding decline in the use of electricity. Sustained low natural gas prices may also cause utilities to phase out or close existing coal-fired power plants. If utilities burn less coal or eliminate coal in the production of electricity, the availability of the tax credits would also be reduced.

•

Environmental concerns regarding coal. Environmental concerns about greenhouse gases, toxic wastewater discharges and the potential hazardous nature of coal combustion waste could lead to public pressure to reduce, or regulations that discourage, the burning of coal. For example, regulations could mandate that electric power generating companies purchase a minimum amount of power from renewable energy sources such as wind, hydroelectric, solar and geothermal.

•

Demand for commercial refined coal plants. The implementation of environmental regulations regarding certain pollution control and permitting requirements has been delayed from time to time due to various lawsuits. The uncertainty created by litigation and reconsiderations of rule-making by the Environmental Protection Agency could negatively impact power generational facilities’ demand for commercial refined coal plants, should we need to move them as described below.

•

Incompatible coal. If utilities purchase coal of a quality or type incompatible with their boilers and operations, treating such coal through a commercial refined coal plant could magnify the negative impacts of burning such coal. As a result, refined coal plants at such utilities may be removed from production until the incompatible coal has all been burned, which could cause us to be unable to take full advantage of the tax credits.

•

Moving a commercial refined coal plant. Changes in circumstances, such as those described above, may cause a commercial refined coal plant to be moved to a different power generation facility, which could require us to invest additional capital. Three plants do not currently have long-term production contracts, and may have to be moved once negotiations for such contracts are finalized. In addition, if for any reason one or more of these operations are unable to satisfy regulatory permitting requirements and the utilities at which they are installed are unable to timely obtain long-term permits, we may not be able to generate additional earnings from these operations.

•

Intellectual property risks. There is a risk that foreign laws will not protect the intellectual property associated with The Chem-Mod™ Solution to the same extent as U.S. laws, leaving us vulnerable to companies outside the U.S. who may attempt to copy such intellectual property. In addition, other companies may make claims of intellectual property infringement with respect to The Chem-Mod™ Solution. Such intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could require that Chem-Mod (or us and our investment and operational partners) obtain a license to use the intellectual property, which might not be obtainable on favorable terms, if at all. In July 2014, we were named in a lawsuit asserting that we and other defendants are liable for infringement of a patent held by Nalco Company. In response, we filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on behalf of all defendants, alleging no infringement of Nalco’s intellectual property. This motion and similar motions attacking amended complaints filed by Nalco, were granted. On April 20, 2016 the court dismissed Nalco’s complaint and disallowed any further opportunity to amend or refile. Although Nalco has appealed this ruling, we believe that the probability of a material loss is remote. However, litigation is inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate disposition of this proceeding. If Chem-Mod (or we and our investment and operational partners) cannot defeat or defend this or other such claims or obtain necessary licenses on reasonable terms, the operations may be precluded from using The Chem-Mod™ Solution.

•

Strategic alternatives risk. While we currently expect to continue to hold at least a portion of these refined coal investments, if for any reason in the future we decide to sell more of our interests, the discount rate on future cash flows could be excessive, and could result in an impairment on our investment.

•

IRC Section 45 phase out provisions. IRC Section 45 contains phase out provisions based upon the market price of coal, such that, if the price of coal rises to specified levels, we could lose some or all of the tax credits we expect to receive from these investments.

The IRC Section 45 operations in which we have invested and the by-products from such operations may result in environmental and product liability claims and environmental compliance costs.

The construction and operation of the IRC Section 45 operations are subject to Federal, state and local laws, regulations and potential liabilities arising under or relating to the protection or preservation of the environment, natural resources and human health and safety. Such laws and regulations generally require the operations and/or the utilities at which the operations are located to obtain and comply with various environmental registrations, licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals. There are costs associated with ensuring compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and failure to fully comply with all applicable laws and regulations could lead to the imposition of penalties or other liability. Failure of The Chem-Mod™ Solution utilized at coal-fired generation facilities, for example, could result in violations of air emissions permits, which could lead to the imposition of penalties or other liability. Additionally, some environmental laws, without regard to fault or the legality of a party’s conduct, on certain entities that are considered to have contributed to, or are otherwise responsible for, the release or threatened release of hazardous substances into the environment. One party may, under certain circumstances, be required to bear more than its share or the entire share of investigation and cleanup costs at a site if payments or participation cannot be obtained from other responsible parties. By using The Chem-Mod™ Solution at locations owned and operated by others, we and our partners may be exposed to the risk of being held liable for environmental damage from releases of hazardous substances we may have had little, if any, involvement in creating. Such risk remains even after production ceases at an operation to the extent the environmental damage can be traced to the types of chemicals or compounds used or operations conducted in connection with The Chem-Mod™ Solution. In addition, we and our partners could face the risk of environmental and product liability claims related to concrete incorporating fly ash produced using The Chem-Mod™ Solution. No assurances can be given that contractual arrangements and precautions taken to ensure assumption of these risks by facility owners or operators, or other end users, will result in that facility owner or operator, or other end user, accepting full responsibility for any environmental or product liability claim. Nor can we or our partners be certain that facility owners or operators, or other end users, will fully comply with all applicable laws and regulations, and this could result in environmental or product liability claims. It is also not uncommon for private claims by third parties alleging contamination to also include claims for personal injury, property damage, nuisance, diminution of property value, or similar claims. Furthermore, many environmental, health and safety laws authorize citizen suits, permitting third parties to make claims for violations of laws or permits. Our insurance may not cover all environmental risk and costs or may not provide sufficient coverage in the event of an environmental or product liability claim, and defense of such claims can be costly, even when such defense prevails. If significant uninsured losses arise from environmental or product liability claims, or if the costs of environmental compliance increase for any reason, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We have historically benefited from IRC Section 29 tax credits and that law expired on December 31, 2007. The disallowance of IRC Section 29 tax credits would likely cause a material loss.

The law permitting us to claim IRC Section 29 tax credits related to our synthetic coal operations expired on December 31, 2007. We believe our claim for IRC Section 29 tax credits in 2007 and prior years is in accordance with IRC Section 29 and four private letter rulings previously obtained by IRC Section 29-related limited liability companies in which we had an interest. We understand these private letter rulings are consistent with those issued to other taxpayers and have received no indication from the IRS that it will seek to revoke or modify them. However, while our synthetic coal operations are not currently under audit, the IRS could place those operations under audit and an adverse outcome may cause a material loss or cause us to be subject to liability under indemnification obligations related to prior sales of partnership interests in partnerships claiming IRC Section 29 tax credits. For additional information about the potential negative effects of adverse tax audits and related indemnification contingencies, see the discussion on IRC Section 29 tax credits included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

We have debt outstanding that could adversely affect our financial flexibility and subjects us to restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability to operate our business.

As of December 31, 2016, we had total consolidated debt outstanding of approximately $2.7 billion. The level of debt outstanding each period could adversely affect our financial flexibility. We also bear risk at the time debt matures. Our ability to make interest and principal payments, to refinance our debt obligations and to fund our acquisition program and planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash from operations. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control, such as an environment of rising interest rates. It will also reduce the ability to use that cash for other purposes, including working capital, dividends to stockholders, acquisitions, capital expenditures, share repurchases, and general corporate purposes. If we cannot service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, and investments, any of which could impede the implementation of our business strategy or prevent us from entering into transactions that would otherwise benefit our business. Additionally, we may not be able to effect such actions, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

The agreements governing our debt contain covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of assets, incur additional debt, engage in certain asset sales, mergers, acquisitions or similar transactions, create liens on assets, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, change our business or make investments, and require us to comply with certain financial covenants. The restrictions in the agreements governing our debt may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business and our stockholders and may make it difficult for us to execute our business strategy successfully or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted. We may also incur future debt obligations that might subject us to additional or more restrictive covenants that could affect our financial and operational flexibility, including our ability to pay dividends. We cannot make any assurances that we will be able to refinance our debt or obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all. A failure to comply with the restrictions under the agreements governing our debt could result in a default under the financing obligations or could require us to obtain waivers from our lenders for failure to comply with these restrictions. The occurrence of a default that remains uncured or the inability to secure a necessary consent or waiver could cause our obligations with respect to our debt to be accelerated and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are a holding company and, therefore, may not be able to receive dividends or other distributions in needed amounts from our subsidiaries.

We are organized as a holding company, a legal entity separate and distinct from our operating subsidiaries. As a holding company without significant operations of our own, we are dependent upon dividends and other payments from our operating subsidiaries to meet our obligations for paying principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, for paying dividends to stockholders, repurchasing our common stock and for corporate expenses. In the event our operating subsidiaries are unable to pay sufficient dividends and other payments to us, we may not be able to service our debt, pay our obligations, pay dividends on or repurchase our common stock.

Further, we derive a significant portion of our revenue and operating profit from operating subsidiaries located outside the U.S. Since the majority of financing obligations as well as dividends to stockholders are paid from the U.S., it is important to be able to access the cash generated by our operating subsidiaries located outside the U.S in the event we are unable to meet these U.S. based cash requirements.

Funds from our operating subsidiaries outside the U.S. may be repatriated to the U.S. via stockholder distributions and intercompany financings, where necessary. A number of factors may arise that could limit our ability to repatriate funds or make repatriation cost prohibitive, including, but not limited to the imposition of currency controls and other government restrictions on repatriation in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, the imposition of withholding and other taxes on such payments and our ability to repatriate earnings in a tax-efficient manner.

In the event we are unable to generate or repatriate cash from our operating subsidiaries for any of the reasons discussed above, our overall liquidity could deteriorate and our ability to finance our obligations, including to pay dividends on or repurchase our common stock, could be adversely affected.

Future sales or other dilution of our equity could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We grow our business organically as well as through acquisitions. One method of acquiring companies or otherwise funding our corporate activities is through the issuance of additional equity securities. The issuance of any additional shares of common or of preferred stock or convertible securities could be substantially dilutive to holders of our common stock. Moreover, to the extent that we issue restricted stock units, performance stock units, options or warrants to purchase our shares of our common stock in the future and those options or warrants are exercised or as the restricted stock units or performance stock units vest, our stockholders may experience further dilution. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle holders to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series and, therefore, such sales or offerings could result in increased dilution to our stockholders. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of shares of our common stock or the perception that such sales could occur.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, and this may make it difficult for you to resell shares of common stock owned by you at times or at prices you find attractive.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, including the risk factors described above, many of which are outside our control. In addition, the stock market is subject to fluctuations in the share prices and trading volumes that affect the market prices of the shares of many companies. These broad market fluctuations have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Among the factors that could affect our stock price are:

•

General economic and political conditions such as recessions, economic downturns and acts of war or terrorism;

•

Quarterly variations in our operating results;

•

Seasonality of our business cycle;

•

Changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;

•

Our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;

•

Changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the insurance brokerage or financial services industries in general;

•

Operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;

•

News reports relating to trends in our markets, including any expectations regarding an upcoming “hard” or “soft” market;

•

Changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;

•

Material announcements by us or our competitors;

•

The impact or perceived impact of developments relating to our investments, including the possible perception by securities analysts or investors that such investments divert management attention from our core operations;

•

Market volatility;

•

A negative market reaction to announced acquisitions;

•

Competitive pressures in each of our segments;

•

General conditions in the insurance brokerage and insurance industries;

•

Legal proceedings or regulatory investigations;

•

Regulatory requirements, including international sanctions and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 or other anti-corruption laws;

•

Quarter-to-quarter volatility in the earnings impact of IRC Section 45 tax credits from our clean energy investments, due to the application of accounting standards applicable to the recognition of tax credits; and

•

Sales of substantial amounts of common shares by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur.

Stockholder class action lawsuits may be instituted against us following a period of volatility in our stock price. Any such litigation could result in substantial cost and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

The executive offices of our corporate segment and certain subsidiary and branch facilities of our brokerage and risk management segments are located at Two Pierce Place, Itasca, Illinois, where we lease approximately 306,000 square feet of space, or approximately 60% of the building. The lease commitment on this property expires on February 28, 2018. We plan to relocate our headquarters to the city of Rolling Meadows, Illinois (a suburb of Chicago approximately 4 miles from our current location) during early 2017.

Elsewhere, we generally operate in leased premises related to the facilities of our brokerage and risk management operations. We prefer to lease office space rather than own real estate related to the branch facilities of our brokerage and risk management segments. Certain of our office space leases have options permitting renewals for additional periods. In addition to minimum fixed rentals, a number of our leases contain annual escalation clauses generally related to increases in an inflation index. See Note 15 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for information with respect to our lease commitments as of December 31, 2016.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Executive Officers

Our executive officers are as follows:



Name	Age		Position and Year First Elected

J. Patrick Gallagher, Jr.		64	Chairman since 2006, President since 1990, Chief Executive Officer since 1995

Walter D. Bay		53	Corporate Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary since 2007

Richard C. Cary		54	Controller since 1997, Chief Accounting Officer since 2001

Joel D. Cavaness		55	Corporate Vice President since 2000, President of our Wholesale Brokerage Operation since 1997

James W. Durkin, Jr.		67	Corporate Vice President, President of our Employee Benefit Brokerage Operation 1985 - 2016, Chairman beginning in 2017

Thomas J. Gallagher		58	Corporate Vice President since 2001, Chairman of our International Brokerage Operation 2010 - 2016, President of our Retail Property/Casualty Brokerage Operation beginning in 2017

James S. Gault		64	Corporate Vice President since 1992, President of our Retail Property/Casualty Brokerage Operation 2002 - 2016, Chairman beginning in 2017

Douglas K. Howell		55	Corporate Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since 2003

Scott R. Hudson		55	Corporate Vice President and President of our Risk Management Operation since 2010

Susan E. Pietrucha		49	Corporate Vice President, Chief Human Resource Officer since 2007

William F. Ziebell *		54	Corporate Vice President since 2011, regional leader in our Employee Benefits Brokerage Operations 2004 - 2016, President beginning in 2017

*	Mr. Ziebell was designated as an executive officer in January 2017.

We have employed each such person principally in management capacities for more than the past five years. All executive officers are appointed annually and serve at the pleasure of our board of directors.

Part II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, trading under the symbol “AJG.” The following table sets forth information as to the price range of our common stock for the two-year period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2016 and the dividends declared per common share for such period. The table reflects the range of high and low sales prices per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite listing.


Quarterly Periods	High		Low		Dividends Declared per Common Share
2016
First	$	44.67	$	35.96	$	0.38
Second		48.64		43.17		0.38
Third		51.24		47.15		0.38
Fourth		52.34		47.16		0.38
2015
First	$	48.71	$	44.24	$	0.37
Second		49.59		46.30		0.37
Third		48.33		39.99		0.37
Fourth		44.54		39.43		0.37

As of January 31, 2017, there were approximately 1,000 holders of record of our common stock.

(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table shows the purchases of our common stock made by or on behalf of Gallagher or any “affiliated purchaser” (as such term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of Gallagher for each fiscal month in the three-month period ended December 31, 2016:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share (2)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (3)		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3)

October 1 through October 31, 2016		—	$	—		—		7,735,489

November 1 through November 30, 2016		4,684		48.44		—		7,735,489

December 1 through December 31, 2016		21,565		51.23		—		7,735,489


Total		26,249	$	50.73		—

(1)

Amounts in this column represent shares of our common stock purchased by the trustees of rabbi trusts established under our Deferred Equity Participation Plan (which we refer to as the DEPP), our Deferred Cash Participation Plan (which we refer to as the DCPP) and our Supplemental Savings and Thrift Plan (which we refer to as the Supplemental Plan), respectively. The DEPP is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that generally provides for distributions to certain of our key executives when they reach age 62 (or the one-year anniversary of the date of the grant for participants over the age of 61 as of the grant date) or upon or after their actual retirement. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in this report for more information regarding the DEPP. The DCPP is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain key employees, other than executive officers, that generally provides for vesting and/or distributions no sooner than five years from the date of awards. Under the terms of the DEPP and the DCPP, we may contribute cash to the rabbi trust and instruct the trustee to acquire a specified number of shares of our common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions based on participant elections. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we instructed the rabbi trustee for the DEPP and the DCPP to reinvest dividends paid into the plans in our common stock and to purchase our common stock using the cash that was funded into these plans related to the 2016 awards. The Supplemental Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows certain highly compensated employees to defer amounts, including company match amounts, on a before-tax basis or after-tax basis. Under the terms of the Supplemental Plan, all cash deferrals and company match amounts may be deemed invested, at the employee’s election, in a number of investment options that include various mutual funds, an annuity product and a fund representing our common stock. When an employee elects to deem his or her amounts under the Supplemental Plan invested in the fund representing our common stock, the trustee of the rabbi trust purchases the number of shares of our common stock equivalent to the amount deemed invested in the fund representing our common stock. We established the rabbi trusts for the DEPP, the DCPP and the Supplemental Plan to assist us in discharging our deferred compensation obligations under these plans. All assets of the rabbi trusts, including any shares of our common stock purchased by the trustees, remain, at all times, assets of the Company, subject to the claims of our creditors. The terms of the DEPP, the DCPP and the Supplemental Plan do not provide for a specified limit on the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased by the respective trustees of the rabbi trusts.

(2)	The average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis and does not include commissions.

(3)

We have a common stock repurchase plan that the board of directors adopted on May 10, 1988 and has periodically amended since that date to authorize additional shares for repurchase (the last amendment was on January 24, 2008). We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under the repurchase plan during the fourth quarter of 2016. The repurchase plan has no expiration date and we are under no commitment or obligation to repurchase any particular amount of our common stock under the plan. At our discretion, we may suspend the repurchase plan at any time.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected consolidated financial data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2016 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements. Such data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8 of this annual report.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
	(In millions, except per share and employee data)
Consolidated Statement of Earnings Data:
Commissions	$	2,439.1		$	2,338.7		$	2,083.0		$	1,553.1		$	1,302.5
Fees		1,492.8			1,432.3			1,258.3			1,059.5			971.7
Supplemental commissions		147.0			125.5			104.0			77.3			67.9
Contingent commissions		107.2			93.7			84.7			52.1			42.9
Investment income and other		1,408.7			1,402.2			1,096.5			437.6			135.3

Total revenues		5,594.8			5,392.4			4,626.5			3,179.6			2,520.3
Total expenses		5,237.9			5,098.9			4,335.0			2,888.6			2,259.2

Earnings before income taxes		356.9			293.5			291.5			291.0			261.1
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(88.1	)		(95.6	)		(36.0	)		6.4			50.3

Net earnings		445.0			389.1			327.5			284.6			210.8
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		30.6			32.3			24.1			16.0			15.8

Net earnings attributable to controlling interests	$	414.4		$	356.8		$	303.4		$	268.6		$	195.0

Per Share Data:
Diluted net earnings per share (1)		2.32			2.06			1.97			2.06			1.59
Dividends declared per common share (2)		1.52			1.48			1.44			1.40			1.36
Share Data:
Shares outstanding at year end		178.3			176.9			164.6			133.6			125.6
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		177.6			172.2			152.9			128.9			121.0
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding		178.4			173.2			154.3			130.5			122.5
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$	11,489.6		$	10,910.5		$	10,010.0		$	6,860.5		$	5,352.3
Long-term debt less current portion		2,150.0			2,075.0			2,125.0			825.0			725.0
Total stockholders’ equity		3,655.8			3,688.2			3,305.1			2,114.8			1,672.8

Return on beginning stockholders’ equity (3)		11	%		11	%		14	%		16	%		26	%
Employee Data:
Number of employees - at year end (4)		24,790			23,857			22,375			18,055			14,924

(1)	Based on the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the year.

(2)	Based on the total dividends declared on a share of common stock outstanding during the entire year.

(3)	Represents net earnings divided by total stockholders’ equity, as of the beginning of the year.

(4)

Prior to September 1, 2016, most of Gallagher’s India-based workforce was provided by a third-party on a cost-pass-through basis. During the third quarter of 2016, Gallagher consummated a transaction whereby it now directly employees those associates, thereby adding approximately 2,700 employees to our global workforce counts shown above. We revised the workforce number as of December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 to conform to the current period presentation.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 8 of this annual report. In addition, please see “Information Regarding Non-GAAP Measures and Other” beginning on page 31 for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures for adjusted total revenues, organic commission, fee and supplemental commission revenues and adjusted EBITDAC to the comparable GAAP measures, as well as other important information regarding these measures.

We are engaged in providing insurance brokerage and third party property/casualty claims settlement and administration services to entities in the U.S. and abroad. We believe that one of our major strengths is our ability to deliver comprehensively structured insurance and risk management services to our clients. Our brokers, agents and administrators act as intermediaries between insurers and our customers and we do not assume net underwriting risks. We are headquartered in Itasca, Illinois, have operations in 33 other countries and offer client-service capabilities in more than 150 countries globally through a network of correspondent brokers and consultants. In 2016, we expanded, and expect to continue to expand, our international operations through both acquisitions and organic growth. We generate approximately 69% of our revenues for the combined brokerage and risk management segments domestically, with the remaining 31% derived internationally, primarily in Australia, Bermuda, Canada, the Caribbean, New Zealand and the U.K. (based on 2016 revenues). We expect that our international revenue as a percentage of our total revenues in 2017 will be comparable to 2016. We have three reportable segments: brokerage, risk management and corporate, which contributed approximately 63%, 13% and 24%, respectively, to 2016 revenues. Our major sources of operating revenues are commissions, fees and supplemental and contingent commissions from brokerage operations and fees from risk management operations. Investment income is generated from invested cash and fiduciary funds, clean energy and other investments, and interest income from premium financing.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains certain statements relating to future results which are forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Please see “Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” in Part I of this annual report, for certain cautionary information regarding forward-looking statements and a list of factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements.

Summary of Financial Results – Year Ended December 31,

See the reconciliations of non-GAAP measures on pages 27 and 28.


	Year 2016						Year 2015						Change
	Reported			Adjusted			Reported			Adjusted			Reported			Adjusted
	GAAP			Non-GAAP			GAAP			Non-GAAP			GAAP			Non-GAAP
	(In millions, except per share data)
Brokerage Segment
Revenues	$	3,527.9		$	3,521.3		$	3,324.0		$	3,232.0			6	%		9	%
Organic revenues				$	3,286.7					$	3,173.9						3.6	%
Net earnings	$	357.1					$	268.1						33	%
Net earnings margin		10.1	%					8.1	%					+205 bpts
Adjusted EBITDAC				$	948.7					$	856.8						11	%
Adjusted EBITDAC margin					26.9	%					26.5	%					+43 bpts
Diluted net earnings per share	$	1.98		$	2.30		$	1.54		$	2.13			29	%		8	%
Risk Management Segment
Revenues	$	718.1		$	718.1		$	727.1		$	723.4			-1	%		-1	%
Organic revenues				$	713.9					$	705.1						1.3	%
Net earnings	$	57.2					$	57.2						0	%
Net earnings margin		8.0	%					7.9	%					+10 bpts
Adjusted EBITDAC				$	124.4					$	124.9						0	%
Adjusted EBITDAC margin					17.3	%					17.3	%					+5 bpts
Diluted net earnings per share	$	0.32		$	0.33		$	0.33		$	0.36			-3	%		-8	%
Corporate Segment
Diluted net earnings per share	$	0.02		$	0.11		$	0.19		$	0.09			-89	%		22	%
Total Company
Diluted net earnings per share	$	2.32		$	2.74		$	2.06		$	2.58			13	%		6	%

In our corporate segment, net after tax earnings from our clean energy investments was $114.4 million in 2016. We anticipate our clean energy investments to generate between $117.0 million and $133.0 million in net after tax earnings in 2017. We expect to use these additional earnings to continue our mergers and acquisition strategy in our core brokerage and risk management operations.

The following provides information that management believes is helpful when comparing revenues, net earnings, EBITDAC and diluted net earnings per share for 2016 and 2015. In addition, these tables provide reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures for adjusted revenues, adjusted EBITDAC (non-GAAP measure) and adjusted diluted net earnings per share. Reconciliations of EBITDAC for the brokerage and risk management segments are provided on pages 35 and 42 of this filing.


Year Ended December 31 Reported GAAP to Adjusted Non-GAAP Reconciliation:

													(Non-GAAP Measure)						Diluted Net Earnings
	Revenues						Net Earnings						EBITDAC						Per Share
Segment	2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015			2016			2015
	(In millions, except per share data)
Brokerage, as reported	$	3,527.9		$	3,324.0		$	357.1		$	268.1		$	885.2		$	746.2		$	1.98		$	1.54
Gains on book sales		(6.6	)		(6.7	)		(4.7	)		(5.0	)		(6.6	)		(6.7	)		(0.03	)		(0.03	)
Acquisition integration		—			—			32.8			69.2			45.7			100.9			0.18			0.40
Workforce & lease termination		—			—			15.1			16.3			20.7			23.0			0.09			0.09
Acquisition related adjustments		—			—			14.9			28.5			3.7			3.4			0.09			0.16
U.K. statutory income tax rate change		—			—			(1.5	)		(4.2	)		—			—			(0.01	)		(0.02	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(85.3	)		—			(1.1	)		—			(10.0	)		—			(0.01	)

Brokerage, as adjusted *		3,521.3			3,232.0			413.7			371.8			948.7			856.8			2.30			2.13

Risk Management, as reported		718.1			727.1			57.2			57.2			122.2			119.1			0.32			0.33
Workforce & lease termination		—			—			1.5			2.1			2.2			2.9			0.01			0.01
Client run-off/bankruptcy		—			1.0			—			3.1			—			4.0			—			0.02
Acquisition related adjustments		—			—			—			(0.3	)		—			—			—			—
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(4.7	)		—			(0.6	)		—			(1.1	)		—			—

Risk Management, as adjusted *		718.1			723.4			58.7			61.5			124.4			124.9			0.33			0.36

Corporate, as reported		1,348.8			1,341.3			30.7			63.8			(157.8	)		(94.0	)		0.02			0.19
Impact of 2015 litigation settlement		—			(31.0	)		16.1			(17.7	)		20.2			(16.2	)		0.09			(0.10	)

Corporate, as adjusted *		1,348.8			1,310.3			46.8			46.1			(137.6	)		(110.2	)		0.11			0.09

Total Company, as reported	$	5,594.8		$	5,392.4		$	445.0		$	389.1		$	849.6		$	771.3		$	2.32		$	2.06

Total Company, as adjusted *	$	5,588.2		$	5,265.7		$	519.2		$	479.4		$	935.5		$	871.5		$	2.74		$	2.58

Total Brokerage & Risk
Management, as reported	$	4,246.0		$	4,051.1		$	414.3		$	325.3		$	1,007.4		$	865.3		$	2.30		$	1.87

Total Brokerage & Risk
Management, as adjusted *	$	4,239.4		$	3,955.4		$	472.4		$	433.3		$	1,073.1		$	981.7		$	2.63		$	2.49

For 2016, the pretax impact of the brokerage segment adjustments totals $80.5 million, with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for income taxes of $23.9 million relating to these items. The pretax impact of the risk management segment adjustments totals $2.2 million, with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for income taxes of $0.7 million relating to these items. The pretax impact of the corporate segment adjustments totals $20.2 million, with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for income taxes of $4.1 million relating to these items. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the pretax impact of the brokerage segment adjustments totals $155.2 million, with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for income taxes of $51.5 million relating to these items. The pretax impact of the risk management segment adjustments totals $5.6 million, with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for income taxes of $1.3 million relating to these items. The pretax impact of the corporate segment adjustments totals ($16.2) million, with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for income taxes of $1.5 million relating to these items.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures - Pre-tax Earnings and Diluted Net Earnings per Share

(In millions except share and per share data)


										Net Earnings		Net Earnings
	Earnings			Provision						(Loss)		(Loss)			Diluted Net
	(Loss)			(Benefit)						Attributable to		Attributable to			Earnings
	Before Income			for Income			Net			Noncontrolling		Controlling			(Loss)
	Taxes			Taxes			Earnings			Interests		Interests			per Share
Year Ended Dec 31, 2016
Brokerage, as reported	$	551.2		$	194.1		$	357.1		$	3.6	$	353.5		$	1.98
Gains on book sales		(6.6	)		(1.9	)		(4.7	)		—		(4.7	)		(0.03	)
Acquisition integration		45.7			12.9			32.8			—		32.8			0.18
Workforce & lease termination		20.7			5.6			15.1			—		15.1			0.09
Acquisition related adjustments		20.7			5.8			14.9			—		14.9			0.09
U.K. statutory income tax rate change		—			1.5			(1.5	)		—		(1.5	)		(0.01	)

Brokerage, as adjusted	$	631.7		$	218.0		$	413.7		$	3.6	$	410.1		$	2.30

Risk Management, as reported	$	92.5		$	35.3		$	57.2		$	—	$	57.2		$	0.32
Workforce & lease termination		2.2			0.7			1.5			—		1.5			0.01

Risk Management, as adjusted	$	94.7		$	36.0		$	58.7		$	—	$	58.7		$	0.33

Corporate, as reported	$	(286.8	)	$	(317.5	)	$	30.7		$	27.0	$	3.7		$	0.02
Impact of 2015 litigation settlement		20.2			4.1			16.1			—		16.1			0.09

Corporate, as adjusted	$	(266.6	)	$	(313.4	)	$	46.8		$	27.0	$	19.8		$	0.11

Year Ended Dec 31, 2015
Brokerage, as reported	$	413.4		$	145.3		$	268.1		$	1.7	$	266.4		$	1.54
Gains on book sales		(6.7	)		(1.7	)		(5.0	)		—		(5.0	)		(0.03	)
Acquisition integration		100.9			31.7			69.2			—		69.2			0.40
Workforce & lease termination		23.0			6.7			16.3			—		16.3			0.09
Acquisition related adjustments		39.8			11.3			28.5			—		28.5			0.16
U.K. statutory income tax rate change		—			4.2			(4.2	)		—		(4.2	)		(0.02	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		(1.8	)		(0.7	)		(1.1	)		—		(1.1	)		(0.01	)

Brokerage, as adjusted	$	568.6		$	196.8		$	371.8		$	1.7	$	370.1		$	2.13

Risk Management, as reported	$	92.3		$	35.1		$	57.2		$	—	$	57.2		$	0.33
Workforce & lease termination		2.9			0.8			2.1			—		2.1			0.01
Client run-off/bankruptcy		4.0			0.9			3.1			—		3.1			0.02
Acquisition related adjustments		(0.5	)		(0.2	)		(0.3	)		—		(0.3	)		—
Levelized foreign currency translation		(0.8	)		(0.2	)		(0.6	)		—		(0.6	)		—

Risk Management, as adjusted	$	97.9		$	36.4		$	61.5		$	—	$	61.5		$	0.36

Corporate, as reported	$	(212.2	)	$	(276.0	)	$	63.8		$	30.6	$	33.2		$	0.19
Impact of 2015 litigation settlement		(16.2	)		1.5			(17.7	)		—		(17.7	)		(0.10	)

Corporate, as adjusted	$	(228.4	)	$	(274.5	)	$	46.1		$	30.6	$	15.5		$	0.09

Insurance Market Overview

Fluctuations in premiums charged by property/casualty insurance carriers have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry. Commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds and normally follow premium levels. Insurance premiums are cyclical in nature and may vary widely based on market conditions. Various factors, including competition for market share among insurance carriers, increased underwriting capacity and improved economies of scale following consolidations, can result in flat or reduced property/casualty premium rates (a “soft” market). A soft market tends to put downward pressure on commission revenues. Various countervailing factors, such as greater than anticipated loss experience and capital shortages, can result in increasing property/casualty premium rates (a “hard” market). A hard market tends to favorably impact commission revenues. Hard and soft markets may be broad-based or more narrowly focused across individual product lines or geographic areas. As markets harden, certain insureds, who are the buyers of insurance

(our brokerage clients), have historically resisted paying increased premiums and the higher commissions these premiums generate. Such resistance often causes some buyers to raise their deductibles and/or reduce the overall amount of insurance coverage they purchase. As the market softens, or costs decrease, these trends have historically reversed. During a hard market, buyers may switch to negotiated fee in lieu of commission arrangements to compensate us for placing their risks, or may consider the alternative insurance market, which includes self-insurance, captives, rent-a-captives, risk retention groups and capital market solutions to transfer risk. According to industry estimates, these mechanisms now account for 50% of the total U.S. commercial property/casualty market. Our brokerage units are very active in these markets as well. While increased use by insureds of these alternative markets historically has reduced commission revenue to us, such trends generally have been accompanied by new sales and renewal increases in the areas of risk management, claims management, captive insurance and self-insurance services and related growth in fee revenue. Inflation tends to increase the levels of insured values and risk exposures, resulting in higher overall premiums and higher commissions. However, the impact of hard and soft market fluctuations has historically had a greater impact on changes in premium rates, and therefore on our revenues, than inflationary pressures.

The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers (which we refer to as the CIAB) 2016 quarterly surveys indicated that U.S. commercial property/casualty rates decreased by 3.7%, 3.9%, 3.2% and 3.3% on average across all lines, for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2016, respectively. The fourth quarter 2016 CIAB survey indicated that rates declined for the eighth straight quarter. CIAB survey respondents noted that the decrease in rates during the fourth quarter of 2016 were fairly consistent with the third quarter of 2016, signaling some stability in the market. In 2017, while we see retail property/casualty rates as a headwind, we do see property/casualty exposure growth offsetting this partially. We also see employment growth and complexity surrounding the Affordable Care Act as tailwinds for our employee benefit units. In addition, our history of strong new business generation, solid retentions and enhanced value-added services for our carrier partners should all result in further organic growth opportunities around the world. We believe similar conditions exist as we start the January 1, 2017 renewal season. Internationally, we see a similar market in U.K. retail Canada, Australia and New Zealand, but more softening in London Specialty. Overall, we believe a modestly-down rate environment can be partially mitigated through exposure unit growth in certain lines and by our professionals demonstrating our expertise and high quality value added capabilities by strengthening our clients’ insurance portfolio in these times. Based on our experience, insurance carriers appear to be making rational pricing decisions. In lines and accounts where rate increases or decreases are warranted, the underwriters are pricing accordingly. As carriers reach their profitability targets in lines, rates may start to flatten. In summary, in this environment, rates decreased at a moderate pace, clients can still obtain coverage, businesses continue to stay in standard-line markets and there is adequate capacity in the insurance market. It is not clear whether the rate retraction will continue due to the uncertainty of the current economic environment. The CIAB represents the leading domestic and international insurance brokers, who write approximately 85% of the commercial property/casualty premiums in the U.S.

Clean energy investments - In 2009 and 2011, we built a total of 29 commercial clean coal production plants to produce refined coal using Chem-Mod’s (see below) proprietary technologies. On September 1, 2013, we purchased a 99% interest in a limited liability company that has ownership interests in four limited liability companies that own five clean coal production plants. On March 1, 2014, we purchased an additional ownership interest in seven of the 2009 Era Plants and five of the 2011 Era Plants from a co-investor. For all seven of the 2009 Era Plants, our ownership increased from 49.5% to 100.0%. For the 2011 Era Plants, our ownership increased from 48.8% to 90.0% for one of the plants, from 49.0% to 100.0% for three of the plants and from 98.0% to 100.0% for one of the plants. We believe these operations produce refined coal that qualifies for tax credits under IRC Section 45. The law that provides for IRC Section 45 tax credits expires in December 2019 for the fourteen plants we built and placed in service in 2009 (2009 Era Plants) and in December 2021 for the fifteen plants we built and placed in service in 2011, plus the five plants we purchased interests in that were placed in service in 2011 (2011 Era Plants).

Thirty-one plants are under long-term production contracts with several utilities. The remaining three plants are in early stages of seeking and negotiating long-term production contracts.

We also own a 46.5% controlling interest in Chem-Mod, which has been marketing The Chem-Mod™ Solution proprietary technologies principally to refined fuel plants that sell refined fuel to coal-fired power plants owned by utility companies, including those plants in which we hold interests. Based on current production estimates provided by licensees, Chem-Mod could generate for us approximately $4.0 million to $5.0 million of net after-tax earnings per quarter.

Our current estimate of the 2017 annual net after tax earnings that could be generated from all of our clean energy investments in 2017 is between $117.0 million to $133.0 million.

All estimates set forth above regarding the future results of our clean energy investments are subject to significant risks, including those set forth in the risk factors regarding our IRC Section 45 investments under Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (which we refer to as GAAP), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We believe the following significant accounting policies may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for other significant accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition - See Revenue Recognition in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 to our 2016 consolidated financial statements for information with respect to the potential impacts a new accounting standard relating to revenue recognition could have on our future financial position and operating results.

Income Taxes - See Income Taxes in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

Uncertain tax positions are measured based upon the facts and circumstances that exist at each reporting period and involve significant management judgment. Subsequent changes in judgment based upon new information may lead to changes in recognition, derecognition and measurement. Adjustments may result, for example, upon resolution of an issue with the taxing authorities, or expiration of a statute of limitations barring an assessment for an issue. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in our provision for income taxes. See Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion regarding the possibility that our gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next twelve months.

Tax law requires certain items to be included in our tax returns at different times than such items are reflected in the financial statements. As a result, the annual tax expense reflected in our consolidated statements of earnings is different than that reported in the tax returns. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in the returns, and some differences are temporary and reverse over time, such as depreciation expense and amortization expense deductible for income tax purposes. Temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent tax expense recognized in the financial statements for which a tax payment has been deferred, or expense which has been deducted in the tax return but has not yet been recognized in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in tax returns in future years for which a benefit has already been recorded in the financial statements.

We establish or adjust valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when we estimate that it is more likely than not that future taxable income will be insufficient to fully use a deduction or credit in a specific jurisdiction. In assessing the need for the recognition of a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized and adjust the valuation allowance accordingly. We evaluate all significant available positive and negative evidence as part of our analysis. Negative evidence includes the existence of losses in recent years. Positive evidence includes the forecast of future taxable income by jurisdiction, tax-planning strategies that would result in the realization of deferred tax assets and the presence of taxable income in prior carryback years. The underlying assumptions we use in forecasting future taxable income require significant judgment and take into account our recent performance. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences are deductible or creditable.

Intangible Assets/Earnout Obligations - See Intangible Assets in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

Current accounting guidance related to business combinations requires us to estimate and recognize the fair value of liabilities related to potential earnout obligations as of the acquisition dates for all of our acquisitions subject to earnout provisions. The maximum potential earnout payables disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements represent the maximum amount of additional consideration that could be paid pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement for the applicable acquisition. The amounts recorded as earnout payables, which are primarily based upon the estimated future operating results of the acquired entities over a two- to three-year period subsequent to the acquisition date, are measured at fair value as of the acquisition date and are included on that basis in the recorded purchase price consideration. We will record subsequent changes in these estimated earnout obligations, including the accretion of discount, in our consolidated statement of earnings when incurred.

The fair value of these earnout obligations is based on the present value of the expected future payments to be made to the sellers of the acquired entities in accordance with the provisions outlined in the respective purchase agreements. In determining fair value, we estimate the acquired entity’s future performance using financial projections that are developed by management for the acquired entity and market participant assumptions that are derived for revenue growth and/or profitability. We estimate future payments using the earnout formula and performance targets specified in each purchase agreement and these financial projections. We then discount these payments to present value using a risk-adjusted rate that takes into consideration market-based rates of return that reflect the ability of the acquired entity to achieve the targets. Changes in financial projections, market participant assumptions for revenue growth and/or profitability, or the risk-adjusted discount rate, would result in a change in the fair value of recorded earnout obligations. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion on our 2016 business combinations.

Business Combinations and Dispositions

See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our 2016 business combinations. We did not have any material dispositions in 2016, 2015 and 2014.

Results of Operations

Information Regarding Non-GAAP Measures and Other

In the discussion and analysis of our results of operations that follows, in addition to reporting financial results in accordance with GAAP, we provide information regarding EBITDAC, EBITDAC margin, adjusted EBITDAC, adjusted EBITDAC margin, diluted net earnings per share, as adjusted (adjusted EPS) for the brokerage and risk management segments, adjusted revenues, adjusted compensation and operating expenses, adjusted compensation expense ratio, adjusted operating expense ratio and organic revenue measures for each operating segment. These measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, the GAAP information provided in this report. We believe that these presentations provide useful information to management, analysts and investors regarding financial and business trends relating to our results of operations and financial condition. Our industry peers may provide similar supplemental non-GAAP information with respect to one or more of these measures, although they may not use the same or comparable terminology and may not make identical adjustments. The non-GAAP information we provide should be used in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the GAAP information provided. As disclosed in our most recent Proxy Statement, we do not make determinations regarding executive officer incentive compensation on the basis of “adjusted” measures such as those described below in “Adjusted revenues and expenses” or “Adjusted EBITDAC”. Instead, incentive compensation determinations for executive officers are made on the basis of revenue and EBITAC (defined as earnings before interest, taxes, amortization and change in estimated earnout payables) for the combined brokerage and risk management segments. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-year amounts reported in this report in order to conform them to the current year presentation.

Adjusted Non-GAAP presentation - We believe that the adjusted Non-GAAP presentation of our 2016, 2015 and 2014 information, presented on the following pages, provides stockholders and other interested persons with useful information regarding certain financial metrics that may assist such persons in analyzing our operating results as they develop a future earnings outlook for us. The after-tax amounts related to the adjustments were computed using the normalized effective tax rate for each respective period.

•

Adjusted revenues and expenses - We define these measures as revenues, compensation expense and operating expense, respectively, each adjusted to exclude the following:

•

Net gains realized from sales of books of business, which are primarily net proceeds received related to sales of books of business and other divestiture transactions.

•

Acquisition integration costs, which include costs related to certain of our large acquisitions, outside the scope of our usual tuck-in strategy, not expected to occur on an ongoing basis in the future once we fully assimilate the applicable acquisition. These costs are typically associated with redundant workforce, extra lease space, duplicate services and external costs incurred to assimilate the acquisition with our IT related systems.

•

Claim portfolio transfer ramp up fees/costs and client run-off/bankruptcy costs.

•

Workforce related charges, which primarily include severance costs related to employee terminations and other costs associated with redundant workforce.

•

Lease termination related charges, which primarily include costs related to terminations of real estate leases and abandonment of leased space.

•

Acquisition related adjustments, which include change in estimated acquisition earnout payables adjustments, impacts of acquisition valuation true-ups, impairment charges and acquisition related compensation charges.

•

The impact of foreign currency translation, as applicable. The amounts excluded with respect to foreign currency translation are calculated by applying current year foreign exchange rates to the same periods in the prior year.

•

Adjusted ratios - Adjusted compensation expense ratio and adjusted operating expense ratio, respectively, each divided by adjusted revenues.

Non-GAAP Earnings Measures

•

EBITDAC and EBITDAC Margin - EBITDAC is net earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and the change in estimated acquisition earnout payables and EBITDAC margin is EBITDAC divided by total revenues. These measures for the brokerage and risk management segments provide a meaningful representation of our operating performance and, for the overall business, provide a meaningful way to measure its financial performance on an ongoing basis.

•

Adjusted EBITDAC and Adjusted EBITDAC Margin - Adjusted EBITDAC is EBITDAC adjusted to exclude gains realized from sales of books of business, acquisition integration costs, workforce related charges, lease termination related charges, claim portfolio transfer ramp up fees/costs, client run-off/bankruptcy costs, acquisition related adjustments, and the period-over-period impact of foreign currency translation, as applicable and Adjusted EBITDAC margin is Adjusted EBITDAC divided by total adjusted revenues (defined above). These measures for the brokerage and risk management segments provide a meaningful representation of our operating performance, and are also presented to improve the comparability of our results between periods by eliminating the impact of the items that have a high degree of variability.

•

Adjusted EPS for the Brokerage and Risk Management segments - We define this measure as net earnings adjusted to exclude the after-tax impact of gains realized from sales of books of business, acquisition integration costs, claim portfolio transfer ramp up fees/costs, client run-off/bankruptcy costs, workforce related charges, lease termination related charges and acquisition related adjustments, the period-over-period impact of foreign currency translation, as applicable, divided by diluted weighted average shares outstanding. This measure provides a meaningful representation of our operating performance (and as such should not be used as a measure of our liquidity), and is also presented to improve the comparability of our results between periods by eliminating the impact of the items that have a high degree of variability.

Organic Revenues (a non-GAAP Measure) - For the brokerage segment, organic change in base commission and fee revenues excludes the first twelve months of net commission and fee revenues generated from acquisitions and the net commission and fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each year presented. These commissions and fees are excluded from organic revenues in order to help interested persons analyze the revenue growth associated with the operations that were a part of our business in both the current and prior year. In addition, change in base commission and fee revenue organic growth excludes the period-over-period impact of foreign currency translation. For the risk management segment, organic change in fee revenues excludes the first twelve months of fee revenues generated from acquisitions and the fee revenues related to operations disposed of in each year presented. In addition, change in organic growth excludes the impact of claim portfolio transfer ramp up fees, client run-off bankruptcy costs, and the period-over-period impact of foreign currency translation to improve the comparability of our results between periods by eliminating the impact of the items that have a high degree of variability or due to the limited-time nature of these revenue sources.

These revenue items are excluded from organic revenues in order to determine a comparable, but non-GAAP, measurement of revenue growth that is associated with the revenue sources that are expected to continue in 2017 and beyond. We have historically viewed organic revenue growth as an important indicator when assessing and evaluating the performance of our brokerage and risk management segments. We also believe that using this non-GAAP measure allows readers of our financial statements to measure, analyze and compare the growth from our brokerage and risk management segments in a meaningful and consistent manner.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Information Presented to GAAP Measures - This report includes tabular reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures for adjusted revenues, adjusted compensation expense and adjusted operating expense, EBITDAC, EBITDAC margin, adjusted EBITDAC, adjusted EBITDAC margin, diluted net earnings per share (as adjusted) and organic revenue measures.

Brokerage Segment

The brokerage segment accounted for 63% of our revenue in 2016. Our brokerage segment is primarily comprised of retail and wholesale brokerage operations. Our retail brokerage operations negotiate and place property/casualty, employer-provided health and welfare insurance and retirement solutions, principally for middle-market commercial, industrial, public entity, religious and not-for-profit entities. Many of our retail brokerage customers choose to place their insurance with insurance underwriters, while others choose to use alternative vehicles such as self-insurance pools, risk retention groups or captive insurance companies. Our wholesale brokerage operations assist our brokers and other unaffiliated brokers and agents in the placement of specialized, unique and hard-to-place insurance programs.

Our primary sources of compensation for our retail brokerage services are commissions paid by insurance companies, which are usually based upon a percentage of the premium paid by insureds, and brokerage and advisory fees paid directly by our clients. For wholesale brokerage services, we generally receive a share of the commission paid to the retail broker from the insurer. Commission rates are dependent on a number of factors, including the type of insurance, the particular insurance company underwriting the policy and whether we act as a retail or wholesale broker. Advisory fees are dependent on the extent and value of services we provide. In addition, under certain circumstances, both retail brokerage and wholesale brokerage services receive supplemental and contingent commissions. A supplemental commission is a commission paid by an insurance carrier that is above the base commission paid, is determined by the insurance carrier and is established annually in advance of the contractual period based on historical performance criteria. A contingent commission is a commission paid by an insurance carrier based on the overall profit and/or volume of the business placed with that insurance carrier during a particular calendar year and is determined after the contractual period.

Litigation and Regulatory Matters - A portion of our brokerage business includes the development and management of “micro-captives,” through operations we acquired in 2010 in our acquisition of the assets of Tribeca Strategic Advisors (Tribeca). A “captive” is an insurance company that insures the risks of its owner, affiliates or a group of companies. Micro-captives are captive insurance companies that are subject to taxation only on net investment income under IRC Section 831(b). Our micro-captive advisory services are under investigation by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Additionally, the IRS has initiated audits for the 2012 tax year of over 100 of the micro-captive insurance companies organized and/or managed by us. Among other matters, the IRS is investigating whether we have been acting as a tax shelter promoter in connection with these operations. While the IRS has not made specific allegations relating to our operations or the pre-acquisition activities of Tribeca, if the IRS were to successfully assert that the micro-captives organized and/or managed by us do not meet the requirements of IRC Section 831(b), we could be subject to monetary claims by the IRS and/or our micro-captive clients, and our future earnings from our micro-captive operations could be materially adversely affected, any of which event could negatively impact the overall captive business and adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. We may also experience lost earnings due to the negative effect of an extended IRS investigation on our clients’ and potential clients’ businesses. Annual renewals for micro-captive clients generally occur during the fourth quarter. Therefore, any negative impact from this investigation would likely have a disproportionate impact on fourth-quarter results. In 2016, 2015 and 2014, our micro-captive operations contributed less than $3.5 million of net earnings and less than $5.0 million of EBITDAC to our consolidated results in any one year. Due to the fact that the IRS has not made any allegation against us or completed all of its audits of our clients, we are not able to reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss in connection with this investigation.

Financial information relating to our brokerage segment results for 2016, 2015 and, 2014 (in millions, except per share, percentages and workforce data):


Statement of Earnings	2016			2015			Change			2015			2014			Change
Commissions	$	2,439.1		$	2,338.7		$	100.4		$	2,338.7		$	2,083.0		$	255.7
Fees		775.7			705.8			69.9			705.8			577.0			128.8
Supplemental commissions		147.0			125.5			21.5			125.5			104.0			21.5
Contingent commissions		107.2			93.7			13.5			93.7			84.7			9.0
Investment income		52.3			53.6			(1.3	)		53.6			40.3			13.3
Gains realized on books of business sales		6.6			6.7			(0.1	)		6.7			7.3			(0.6	)

Total revenues		3,527.9			3,324.0			203.9			3,324.0			2,896.3			427.7

Compensation		2,041.8			1,939.7			102.1			1,939.7			1,703.1			236.6
Operating		600.9			638.1			(37.2	)		638.1			530.1			108.0
Depreciation		57.2			54.4			2.8			54.4			44.4			10.0
Amortization		244.7			237.3			7.4			237.3			186.3			51.0
Change in estimated acquisition earnout payables		32.1			41.1			(9.0	)		41.1			17.6			23.5

Total expenses		2,976.7			2,910.6			66.1			2,910.6			2,481.5			429.1

Earnings before income taxes		551.2			413.4			137.8			413.4			414.8			(1.4	)
Provision for income taxes		194.1			145.3			48.8			145.3			151.0			(5.7	)

Net earnings		357.1			268.1			89.0			268.1			263.8			4.3
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		3.6			1.7			1.9			1.7			0.9			0.8

Net earnings attributable to controlling interests	$	353.5		$	266.4		$	87.1		$	266.4		$	262.9		$	3.5

Diluted net earnings per share	$	1.98		$	1.54		$	0.44		$	1.54		$	1.70		$	(0.16	)

Other Information
Change in diluted net earnings per share		29	%		(9	%)					(9	%)		9	%
Growth in revenues		6	%		15	%					15	%		36	%
Organic change in commissions and fees		3	%		3	%					3	%		4	%
Compensation expense ratio		58	%		58	%					58	%		59	%
Operating expense ratio		17	%		19	%					19	%		18	%
Effective income tax rate		35	%		35	%					35	%		36	%
Workforce at end of period (includes acquisitions) *		18,635			17,841						17,841			16,681
Identifiable assets at December 31	$	9,183.4		$	8,969.7					$	8,969.7		$	8,386.2

Prior to September 1, 2016, most of our India-based workforce was provided by a third party on a cost-pass-through basis. During 2016, we consummated a transaction whereby we now directly employ those associates thereby adding approximately 2,700 employees to our global workforce counts, of which approximately 2,200 employees were included in the 2016 number above. We revised the workforce number as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 to conform to the current period presentation.

The following provides information that management believes is helpful when comparing EBITDAC and adjusted EBITDAC for 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions):


	2016			2015			Change			2015			2014			Change
Net earnings, as reported	$	357.1		$	268.1			33.2	%	$	268.1		$	263.8			1.6	%
Provision for income taxes		194.1			145.3						145.3			151.0
Depreciation		57.2			54.4						54.4			44.4
Amortization		244.7			237.3						237.3			186.3
Change in estimated acquisition earnout payables		32.1			41.1						41.1			17.6

EBITDAC		885.2			746.2			18.6	%		746.2			663.1			12.5	%
Gains from books of business sales		(6.6	)		(6.7	)					(6.7	)		(7.3	)
Acquisition integration		45.7			100.9						100.9			67.1
Acquisition related adjustments		3.7			3.4						3.4			1.1
Workforce and lease termination related charges		20.7			23.0						23.0			7.8
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(10.0	)					—			(22.3	)

EBITDAC, as adjusted	$	948.7		$	856.8			10.7	%	$	866.8		$	709.5			22.2	%

Net earnings margin, as reported		10.1	%		8.1	%		+205 bpts			8.1	%		9.1	%		-104 bpts

EBITDAC margin, as adjusted		26.9	%		26.5	%		+43 bpts			26.1	%		25.4	%		+75 bpts

Reported revenues	$	3,527.9		$	3,324.0					$	3,324.0		$	2,896.3

Adjusted revenues - see page 27	$	3,521.3		$	3,232.0					$	3,317.3		$	2,795.0

Acquisition integration costs include costs related to our July 2, 2014 acquisition of Noraxis Capital Corporation (which we refer to as Noraxis), our June 16, 2014 acquisition of Crombie/OAMPS (which we refer to as Crombie/OAMPS), our April 1, 2014 acquisition of Oval Group of Companies (which we refer to as Oval), our November 14, 2013 acquisition of Giles Group of Companies (which we refer to as Giles) and our August 1, 2015 acquisition of William Gallagher Associates Insurance Brokers (which we refer to WGA) that are not expected to occur on an ongoing basis in the future once we fully assimilate these acquisitions. These costs relate to on-boarding of employees, communication system conversion costs, related performance compensation, redundant workforce, extra lease space, duplicate services and external costs incurred to assimilate the acquired businesses with our IT related systems. The WGA integration costs in 2016 totaled $5.0 million and were primarily related to retention and incentive compensation. The Noraxis integration costs in 2016 totaled $1.9 million and were primarily related to the consolidation of offices, technology costs and incentive compensation. The Crombie/OAMPS integration costs in 2016 totaled $3.2 million, and were primarily related to technology costs and incentive compensation. The Giles and Oval integration costs in 2016 totaled $35.6 million and were primarily related to the consolidation of offices in the U.K., technology costs, branding and incentive compensation. The Noraxis integration costs in 2015 totaled $7.4 million and were primarily related to the consolidation of offices, technology costs and incentive compensation. The Crombie/OAMPS integration costs in 2015 totaled $23.4 million, and were primarily related to technology costs and incentive compensation. The Giles and Oval integration costs in 2015 totaled $69.0 million and were primarily related to the consolidation of offices in the U.K., technology costs, branding and incentive compensation. Integration costs related to these acquisitions for the full year in 2017 are estimated to be less than a third of what they were in 2016.

Commissions and fees - The aggregate increase in commissions and fees for 2016 was principally due to revenues associated with acquisitions that were made during 2016 ($173.2 million). Commissions and fees in 2016 included new business production of $359.7 million, which was offset by lost business and renewal rate decreases of $362.6 million. The aggregate increase in commissions and fees for 2015 was principally due to revenues associated with acquisitions that were made during 2015 ($390.6 million). Commissions and fees in 2015 included new business production of $345.2 million, which was offset by lost business and renewal rate decreases of $287.3 million. Commission revenues increased 4% and fee revenues increased 10% in 2016 compared to 2015, respectively. Commission revenues increased 12% and fee revenues increased 22% in 2015 compared to 2014, respectively. The organic change in base commission and fee revenues was 3% in 2016, 3% in 2015 and 4% in 2014.

Items excluded from organic revenue computations yet impacting revenue comparisons for 2016, 2015 and 2014 include the following (in millions):


	2016 Organic Revenue									2015 Organic Revenue
	2016			2015			Change			2015			2014			Change
Base Commissions and Fees
Commission and fees, as reported	$	3,214.8		$	3,044.5			5.6	%	$	3,044.5		$	2,660.0			14.5	%
Less commission and fee revenues from acquisitions		(173.2	)		—						(390.6	)		—
Less disposed of operations		—			(3.3	)					—			(9.1	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(78.7	)					—			(82.1	)

Organic base commission and fees	$	3,041.6		$	2,962.5			2.7	%	$	2,653.9		$	2,568.8			3.3	%

Supplemental Commissions
Supplemental commissions, as reported	$	147.0		$	125.5			17.1	%	$	125.5		$	104.0			20.7	%
Less supplemental commissions from acquisitions		(1.5	)		—						(9.1	)		—
Less disposed of operations		—			(0.3	)					—			—
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(6.3	)					—			(3.5	)

Organic supplemental commissions	$	145.5		$	118.9			22.4	%	$	116.4		$	100.5			15.8	%

Contingent Commissions
Contingent commissions, as reported	$	107.2		$	93.7			14.4	%	$	93.7		$	84.7			10.6	%
Less contingent commissions from acquisitions		(7.6	)		—						(11.6	)		—
Less disposed of operations		—			(0.2	)					—			—
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(1.0	)					—			(1.4	)

Organic contingent commissions	$	99.6		$	92.5			7.7	%	$	82.1		$	83.3			-1.4	%

Total reported commissions, fees, supplemental commissions and contingent commissions	$	3,469.0		$	3,263.7			6.3	%	$	3,263.7		$	2,848.7			14.6	%
Less commission and fee revenues from acquisitions		(182.3	)		—						(411.3	)		—
Less disposed of operations		—			(3.8	)					—			(9.1	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(86.0	)					—			(87.0	)

Total organic commissions, fees supplemental commissions and contingent commissions	$	3,286.7		$	3,173.9			3.6	%	$	2,852.4		$	2,752.6			3.6	%


	2015 Organic Revenue									2014 Organic Revenue
	2015			2014			Change			2014			2013			Change
Base Commissions and Fees
Commission and fees, as reported	$	3,044.5		$	2,660.0			14.5	%	$	2,660.0		$	1,985.6			34.0	%
Less commission and fee revenues from acquisitions		(390.6	)		—						(595.2	)		—
Less disposed of operations		—			(9.1	)					—			(8.5	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(82.1	)					—			9.7

Organic base commission and fees	$	2,653.9		$	2,568.8			3.3	%	$	2,064.8		$	1,986.8			3.9	%

Supplemental Commissions
Supplemental commissions, as reported	$	125.5		$	104.0			20.7	%	$	104.0		$	77.3			34.5	%
Less supplemental commissions from acquisitions		(9.1	)		—						(25.2	)		—
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(3.5	)					—			1.0

Organic supplemental commissions	$	116.4		$	100.5			15.8	%	$	78.8		$	78.3			0.6	%

Contingent Commissions
Contingent commissions, as reported	$	93.7		$	84.7			10.6	%	$	84.7		$	52.1			62.6	%
Less contingent commissions from acquisitions		(11.6	)		—						(19.9	)		—
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(1.4	)					—			(0.2	)

Organic contingent commissions	$	82.1		$	83.3			-1.4	%	$	64.8		$	51.9			24.9	%

Total reported commissions, fees, supplemental commissions and contingent commissions	$	3,263.7		$	2,848.7			14.6	%	$	2,848.7		$	2,115.0			34.7	%
Less commission and fee revenues from acquisitions		(411.3	)		—						(640.3	)		—
Less disposed of operations		—			(9.1	)					—			(8.5	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(87.0	)					—			10.5

Total organic commissions, fees supplemental commissions and contingent commissions	$	2,852.4		$	2,752.6			3.6	%	$	2,208.4		$	2,117.0			4.3	%


Acquisition Activity	2016		2015		2014
Number of acquisitions closed *		37		42		60
Estimated annualized revenues acquired (in millions)	$	137.9	$	223.2	$	761.2

*	For 2016 we issued 1,998,000 shares in connection with tax-free exchange acquisitions and repurchased 2,265,000 shares to fully offset the impact of the issued shares.

Through January 26, 2017, we closed an additional 5 acquisitions with estimated annualized revenues of approximately $32.2 million. No shares were issued related to these acquisitions.

Supplemental and contingent commissions - Reported supplemental and contingent commission revenues recognized in 2016, 2015 and 2014 by quarter are as follows (in millions):


	Q1		Q2		Q3		Q4		Full Year
2016
Reported supplemental commissions	$	32.9	$	38.6	$	35.3	$	40.2	$	147.0
Reported contingent commissions		55.2		25.1		16.4		10.5		107.2

Reported supplemental and contingent commissions	$	88.1	$	63.7	$	51.7	$	50.7	$	254.2


	Q1		Q2		Q3		Q4		Full Year
2015
Reported supplemental commissions	$	26.9	$	34.8	$	29.2	$	34.6	$	125.5
Reported contingent commissions		44.5		22.8		14.5		11.9		93.7

Reported supplemental and contingent commissions	$	71.4	$	57.6	$	43.7	$	46.5	$	219.2

2014
Reported supplemental commissions	$	25.4	$	27.9	$	24.2	$	26.5	$	104.0
Reported contingent commissions		32.2		21.8		14.4		16.3		84.7

Reported supplemental and contingent commissions	$	57.6	$	49.7	$	38.6	$	42.8	$	188.7

Investment income and gains realized on books of business sales - This primarily represents interest income earned on cash, cash equivalents and restricted funds, interest income from premium financing and one-time gains related to sales of books of business, which were $6.6 million, $6.7 million and $7.3 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Investment income in 2016 decreased compared to 2015 primarily due to decreases in interest income from our premium financing business and in interest income earned on client held funds, both of which were related to a decline in interest rates in Australia and New Zealand. Investment income in 2015 increased compared to 2014 primarily due to the interest income from premium financing generated by our Australia and New Zealand operations which were acquired on June 16, 2014.

Compensation expense - The following provides non-GAAP information that management believes is helpful when comparing 2016 and 2015 compensation expense and 2015 and 2014 compensation expense (in millions):


	2016			2015			2015			2014
Compensation expense, as reported	$	2,041.8		$	1,939.7		$	1,939.7		$	1,703.1
Acquisition integration		(16.9	)		(38.3	)		(38.3	)		(45.3	)
Workforce related charges		(17.5	)		(20.0	)		(20.0	)		(7.2	)
Acquisition related adjustments		(3.7	)		(3.4	)		(3.4	)		(1.1	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(52.9	)		—			(53.6	)

Compensation expense, as adjusted	$	2,003.7		$	1,825.1		$	1,878.0		$	1,595.9

Reported compensation expense ratios		57.9	%		58.4	%		58.4	%		58.8	%

Adjusted compensation expense ratios		56.9	%		56.5	%		56.6	%		57.1	%

Reported revenues	$	3,527.9		$	3,324.0		$	3,324.0		$	2,896.3

Adjusted revenues - see page 27	$	3,521.3		$	3,232.0		$	3,317.3		$	2,795.0

The increase in compensation expense in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to an increase in the average number of employees, salary increases, one-time compensation payments and increases in incentive compensation linked to our overall operating results ($81.1 million in the aggregate), increases in employee benefits expense ($15.7 million), stock compensation expense ($4.7 million), deferred compensation ($3.5 million) and temporary staffing ($0.5 million), offset by decreases in severance related costs ($2.5 million) and earnout related compensation expense ($0.9 million). The increase in employee headcount in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily relates to the addition of employees associated with the acquisitions that we completed in 2016 and new production hires.

The increase in compensation expense in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to an increase in the average number of employees, salary increases, one-time compensation payments and increases in incentive compensation linked to our overall operating results ($195.6 million in the aggregate), increases in employee benefits expense ($27.2 million), severance related costs ($12.8 million), stock compensation expense ($4.4 million), and temporary staffing ($0.6 million), offset by a decrease in deferred compensation ($4.0 million). The increase in employee headcount in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily relates to the addition of employees associated with the acquisitions that we completed in 2015 and new production hires.

Operating expense - The following provides non-GAAP information that management believes is helpful when comparing 2016 and 2015 operating expense and 2015 and 2014 operating expense (in millions):


	2016			2015			2015			2014
Operating expense, as reported	$	600.9		$	638.1		$	638.1		$	530.1
Acquisition integration		(28.8	)		(62.6	)		(62.6	)		(21.8	)
Workforce and lease termination related charges		(3.2	)		(3.0	)		(3.0	)		(0.6	)
Levelized foreign currency translation		—			(22.4	)		—			(18.1	)

Operating expense, as adjusted	$	568.9		$	550.1		$	572.5		$	489.6

Reported operating expense ratios		17.0	%		19.2	%		19.2	%		18.3	%

Adjusted operating expense ratios		16.2	%		17.0	%		17.3	%		17.5	%

Reported revenues	$	3,527.9		$	3,324.0		$	3,324.0		$	2,896.3

Adjusted revenues - see page 27	$	3,521.3		$	3,232.0		$	3,317.3		$	2,795.0

The decrease in operating expense in 2016 compared to 2015 was due primarily to favorable foreign currency translation ($3.2 million), decreases in business insurance ($15.3 million), technology expenses ($11.4 million), professional and banking fees ($5.6 million), licenses and fees ($3.7 million), other expense ($3.4 million), bad debt expense ($2.4 million), employee expense ($1.0 million), premium financing interest expense ($0.7 million), real estate expenses ($0.3 million), slightly offset by increases in meeting and client entertainment expenses ($4.2 million), outside consulting fees ($2.9 million), office supplies ($1.3 million) and lease termination charges ($0.2 million). Also contributing to the increase in operating expense in 2016 were increased expenses associated with the acquisitions completed in 2016.

The increase in operating expense in 2015 compared to 2014 was due primarily to increases in technology expenses ($30.5 million), outside consulting fees ($16.3 million), business insurance ($12.9 million), real estate expenses ($11.4 million), meeting and client entertainment expenses ($10.0 million), professional and banking fees ($7.7 million), bad debt expense ($6.4 million), licenses and fees ($4.8 million), employee expense ($2.4 million), lease termination charges ($2.4 million), other expense ($2.3 million), outside services expense ($0.6 million), premium financing interest expense ($0.4 million), interest expense ($0.1 million) and unfavorable foreign currency translation ($1.3 million), slightly offset by a decrease in office supplies ($1.4 million). Also contributing to the increase in operating expense in 2015 were increased expenses associated with the acquisitions completed in 2015.

Depreciation - The increases in depreciation expense in 2016 compared to 2015 and in 2015 compared to 2014 were due primarily to the purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements related to office expansions and moves, and expenditures related to upgrading computer systems. Also contributing to the increases in depreciation expense in 2016, 2015 and 2014 were the depreciation expenses associated with acquisitions completed during these years.

Amortization - The increases in amortization in 2016 compared to 2015 and in 2015 compared to 2014 were due primarily to amortization expense of intangible assets associated with acquisitions completed during these years. Expiration lists, non-compete agreements and trade names are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives (three to fifteen years for expiration lists, three to five years for non-compete agreements and five to ten years for trade names). Based on the results of impairment reviews in 2016, 2015 and 2014, we wrote off $1.8 million, $11.5 million and $1.8 million of amortizable intangible assets related to the brokerage segment acquisitions.

Change in estimated acquisition earnout payables - The change in the expense from the change in estimated acquisition earnout payables in 2016 compared to 2015 and 2015 compared to 2014 was due primarily to adjustments made to the estimated fair value of earnout obligations related to revised projections of future performance. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $16.9 million, $16.2 million and $14.5 million, respectively, of expense related to the accretion of the discount recorded for earnout obligations in connection with our 2016, 2015 and 2014 acquisitions. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $15.2 million, $24.9 million and $3.1 million of expense, respectively, related to net adjustments in the estimated fair market values of earnout obligations in connection with revised projections of future performance for 101, 103 and 67 acquisitions, respectively.

The amounts initially recorded as earnout payables for our 2012 to 2016 acquisitions were measured at fair value as of the acquisition date and are primarily based upon the estimated future operating results of the acquired entities over a two- to three-year period subsequent to the acquisition date. The fair value of these earnout obligations is based on the present value of the expected future payments to be made to the sellers of the acquired entities in accordance with the provisions outlined in the respective purchase agreements. In determining fair value, we estimate the acquired entity’s future performance using financial projections developed by management for the acquired entity and market participant assumptions that were derived for revenue growth and/or profitability. We estimate future earnout payments using the earnout formula and performance targets specified in each purchase agreement and these financial projections. Subsequent changes in the underlying financial projections or assumptions will cause the estimated earnout obligations to change and such adjustments are recorded in our consolidated statement of earnings when incurred. Increases in the earnout payable obligations will result in the recognition of expense and decreases in the earnout payable obligations will result in the recognition of income.

Provision for income taxes - We allocate the provision for income taxes to the brokerage segment using local statutory rates. The brokerage segment’s effective tax rate in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was 35.2% (35.4% on a controlling basis), 35.1% and 36.4%, respectively. We anticipate reporting an effective tax rate on adjusted results of approximately 34.0% to 36.0% in our brokerage segment for the foreseeable future. In third quarter 2016, new tax legislation was enacted in the U.K., which will decrease the U.K. corporation tax rate from the current 18% to 17% effective April 1, 2020. Accordingly, we adjusted our deferred tax asset and liability balances in 2016 to reflect these rate changes, which decreased the provision for income taxes in the brokerage segment by $1.5 million, or $0.01 per share. In fourth quarter 2015, new tax legislation was enacted in the U.K., which will decrease the U.K. corporation tax rate from the current 20% to 19% effective April 1, 2017 and from 19% to 18% effective April 1, 2020. Accordingly, we adjusted our deferred tax asset and liability balances in 2015 to reflect these rate changes, which decreased the provision for income taxes in the brokerage segment by $4.2 million, or $0.02 per share.

Net earnings (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests - The amounts reported in this line for 2016, 2015 and 2014 include non-controlling interest earnings of $3.6 million, $1.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, primarily related to our investment in Capsicum Reinsurance Brokers LLP (which we refer to as Capsicum). We are partners in this venture with Grahame Chilton, the CEO of our International Brokerage Division. We are the controlling partner, participating in 33% of Capsicum’s net operating results and Mr. Chilton owns approximately 50% of Capsicum.

Risk Management Segment

The risk management segment accounted for 13% of our revenue in 2016. The risk management segment provides contract claim settlement and administration services for enterprises that choose to self-insure some or all of their property/casualty coverages and for insurance companies that choose to outsource some or all of their property/casualty claims departments. In addition, this segment generates revenues from integrated disability management programs, information services, risk control consulting (loss control) services and appraisal services, either individually or in combination with arising claims. Revenues for risk management services are substantially in the form of fees that are generally negotiated in advance on a per-claim or per-service basis, depending upon the type and estimated volume of the services to be performed.

Financial information relating to our risk management segment results for 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in millions, except per share, percentages and workforce data):


Statement of Earnings	2016		2015			Change			2015			2014			Change
Fees	$	717.1	$	726.5		$	(9.4	)	$	726.5		$	681.3		$	45.2
Investment income		1.0		0.6			0.4			0.6			1.0			(0.4	)

Total revenues		718.1		727.1			(9.0	)		727.1			682.3			44.8

Compensation		424.5		427.2			(2.7	)		427.2			414.2			13.0
Operating		171.4		180.8			(9.4	)		180.8			176.4			4.4
Depreciation		27.2		24.3			2.9			24.3			21.2			3.1
Amortization		2.5		3.0			(0.5	)		3.0			3.2			(0.2	)
Change in estimated acquisition earnout payables		—		(0.5	)		0.5			(0.5	)		(0.1	)		(0.4	)

Total expenses		625.6		634.8			(9.2	)		634.8			614.9			19.9

Earnings before income taxes		92.5		92.3			0.2			92.3			67.4			24.9
Provision for income taxes		35.3		35.1			0.2			35.1			25.3			9.8

Net earnings		57.2		57.2			(0.0	)		57.2			42.1			15.1
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		—		—			—			—			—			—

Net earnings attributable to controlling interests	$	57.2	$	57.2		$	(0.0	)	$	57.2		$	42.1		$	15.1