10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 001-13901

 

 

LOGO

AMERIS BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

GEORGIA   58-1456434
(State of incorporation)   (IRS Employer ID No.)

310 FIRST STREET, S.E., MOULTRIE, GA 31768

(Address of principal executive offices)

(229) 890-1111

(Registrant’s telephone number)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

There were 23,751,794 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of November 3, 2011.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

AMERIS BANCORP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

         Page  

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1.

  Financial Statements.   
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011, December  31, 2010 and September 30, 2010

     1   
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

     2   
 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

     3   
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

     4   
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     5   

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

     29   

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

     41   

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures.

     41   

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

  

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings.

     41   

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors.

     41   

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

     41   

Item 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

     41   

Item 4.

 

(Removed and Reserved).

     41   

Item 5.

 

Other Information.

     41   

Item 6.

 

Exhibits.

     41   

Signatures

     42   


Table of Contents

Item 1. Financial Statements.

AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

     September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 
     (Unaudited)     (Audited)     (Unaudited)  

Assets

      

Cash and due from banks

   $ 55,761      $ 74,326      $ 43,814   

Federal funds sold and interest bearing accounts

     170,349        261,262        306,867   

Investment securities available for sale, at fair value

     340,839        322,581        235,827   

Other investments

     11,089        12,440        7,326   

Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value

     8,867        —          —     

Loans

     1,368,895        1,374,757        1,462,832   

Covered loans

     595,428        554,991        185,288   

Less: allowance for loan losses

     35,238        34,576        34,072   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans, net

     1,929,085        1,895,172        1,614,048   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other real estate owned

     54,487        57,915        50,919   

Covered other real estate owned

     81,907        54,931        28,416   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other real estate owned

     136,394        112,846        79,335   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FDIC indemnification asset

     239,719        177,187        42,532   

Premises and equipment, net

     71,848        66,589        66,056   

Intangible assets, net

     3,471        4,261        3,097   

Goodwill

     956        956        —     

Other assets

     42,001        44,548        35,801   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 3,010,379      $ 2,972,168      $ 2,434,703   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

      

Liabilities

      

Deposits:

      

Noninterest-bearing

   $ 354,434      $ 301,971      $ 235,646   

Interest-bearing

     2,274,458        2,233,455        1,863,356   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

     2,628,892        2,535,426        2,099,002   

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     13,180        68,184        13,186   

Other borrowings

     21,000        43,495        —     

Other liabilities

     10,616        9,387        6,279   

Subordinated deferrable interest debentures

     42,269        42,269        42,269   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     2,715,957        2,698,761        2,160,736   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

      

Stockholders’ Equity

      

Preferred stock, stated value $1,000; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 52,000 shares issued

     50,572        50,121        49,975   

Common stock, par value $1; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 25,078,968, 24,982,911 and 24,961,239 shares issued

     25,079        24,983        24,961   

Capital surplus

     166,385        165,930        165,544   

Retained earnings

     54,530        37,000        35,947   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     8,687        6,204        8,371   

Treasury stock, at cost, 1,336,174 shares

     (10,831     (10,831     (10,831
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     294,422        273,407        273,967   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 3,010,379      $ 2,972,168      $ 2,434,703   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

1


Table of Contents

AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Interest income

        

Interest and fees on loans

   $ 31,633      $ 26,465      $ 93,480      $ 79,808   

Interest on taxable securities

     2,672        2,295        7,904        7,259   

Interest on nontaxable securities

     330        295        964        898   

Interest on deposits in other banks and federal funds sold

     153        118        500        295   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

     34,788        29,173        102,848        88,260   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense

        

Interest on deposits

     6,431        6,903        20,631        21,318   

Interest on other borrowings

     555        270        1,461        671   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

     6,986        7,173        22,092        21,989   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

     27,802        22,000        80,756        66,271   

Provision for loan losses

     7,552        9,739        23,710        39,117   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     20,250        12,261        57,046        27,154   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noninterest income

        

Service charges on deposit accounts

     4,666        3,761        13,598        10,822   

Mortgage banking activity

     707        712        1,533        1,939   

Other service charges, commissions and fees

     392        180        907        626   

Gain on acquisitions

     26,867        —          26,867        8,208   

Gain on sale of securities

     —          —          238        200   

Other noninterest income

     1,090        357        2,746        1,179   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noninterest income

     33,722        5,010        45,889        22,974   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noninterest expense

        

Salaries and employee benefits

     10,029        7,554        29,293        23,441   

Equipment and occupancy expenses

     3,203        2,171        8,685        6,256   

Amortization of intangible assets

     277        254        782        726   

Data processing and telecommunications expenses

     2,817        1,729        7,665        5,568   

Advertising and marketing expenses

     189        167        501        469   

Other non-interest expenses

     12,748        7,053        26,088        22,813   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total noninterest expense

     29,263        18,928        73,014        59,273   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)

     24,709        (1,657     29,921        (9,145

Income tax expense (benefit)

     8,249        (760     9,969        (3,293
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 16,460      $ (897   $ 19,952      $ (5,852
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Preferred stock dividends

     817        807        2,422        2,402   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

   $ 15,643      $ (1,704   $ 17,530      $ (8,254
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

        

Unrealized holding gain arising during period on investment securities available for sale, net of tax

     2,803        736        4,791        1,680   

Unrealized loss on cash flow hedges arising during period, net of tax

     (1,526     (130     (2,154     (343

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in operations, net of tax

     —          (69     (154     (206
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income

     1,277        537        2,483        1,131   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 16,920      $ (1,167   $ 20,013      $ (7,123
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic earnings/(loss) per share

   $ 0.67      $ (0.07   $ 0.75      $ (0.42

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share

   $ 0.66      $ (0.07   $ 0.74      $ (0.42
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

        

Basic

     23,438        23,571        23,439        19,569   

Diluted

     23,559        23,571        23,530        19,569   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

 

     Nine Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30, 2011     September 30, 2010  
     Shares     Amount     Shares     Amount  

PREFERRED STOCK

        

Balance at beginning of period

     52,000      $ 50,121        52,000      $ 49,552   

Accretion of fair value of warrant

     —          451        —          423   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Issued at end of period

     52,000      $ 50,572        52,000      $ 49,975   

COMMON STOCK

        

Issued at beginning of period

     24,982,911      $ 24,983        15,379,131      $ 15,379   

Issuance of common stock

     —          —          9,473,125        9,473   

Issuance of restricted shares

     125,075        125        113,800        114   

Cancellation of restricted shares

     (32,650     (33     (8,500     (9

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

     3,632        4        3,683        4   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Issued at end of period

     25,078,968      $ 25,079        24,961,239      $ 24,961   

CAPITAL SURPLUS

        

Balance at beginning of period

     $ 165,930        $ 89,389   

Stock-based compensation

       522          389   

Issuance of common stock

       —            75,797   

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

       25          26   

Issuance of restricted shares

       (125       (66

Cancellation of restricted shares

       33          9   
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     $ 166,385        $ 165,544   

RETAINED EARNINGS

        

Balance at beginning of period

     $ 37,000        $ 44,216   

Net income /(loss)

       19,952          (5,852

Dividends on preferred shares

       (1,971       (1,972

Accretion of fair value of warrant

       (451       (423

Cash dividends on common shares

       —            (22
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     $ 54,530        $ 35,947   

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAX

        

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities and derivatives:

        

Balance at beginning of period

     $ 6,204        $ 7,240   

Other comprehensive income

       2,483          1,131   
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     $ 8,687        $ 8,371   

TREASURY STOCK

        

Balance at beginning of period

     $ 10,831        $ 10,812   

Purchase of treasury shares

       —            19   
    

 

 

     

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

     $ 10,831        $ 10,831   

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     $ 294,422        $ 273,967   

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010  

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 19,952      $ (5,852

Adjustments reconciling net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation

     3,248        2,533   

Net gains on sale or disposal of premises and equipment

     (148     (274

Net losses or write-downs on sale of other real estate owned

     9,962        5,923   

Provision for loan losses

     23,710        39,117   

Provision for deferred taxes

     7,882        4,833   

Gain on acquisitions

     (26,867     (8,208

Amortization of intangible assets

     782        726   

Net gains on securities available for sale

     (238     (200

Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale

     (8,867     —     

Change in prepaid FDIC assessment

     3,257        3,647   

Change in other prepaids, deferrals and accruals, net

     2,965        11,725   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     35,638        53,970   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

    

Net (increase)/decrease in federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits

     95,983        (71,279

Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale

     59,655        65,095   

Purchase of securities available for sale

     (116,228     (48,287

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale

     89,345        6,145   

Net decrease in loans

     49,071        21,554   

Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned

     36,885        29,284   

Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment

     1,115        1,714   

Purchases of premises and equipment

     (9,573     (2,392

Decrease in FDIC indemnification asset

     20,519        3,308   

Cash received (paid) in FDIC-assisted acquisitions

     38,017        (35,657
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     264,789        (30,515
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:

    

Net decrease in deposits

     (218,522     (99,909

Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     (55,004     (42,068

Decrease in other borrowings

     (43,495     (2,000

Dividends paid - preferred stock

     (1,971     (1,972

Dividends paid - common stock

     —          (22

Issuance of common stock

     —          85,270   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (318,992     (60,701
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and due from banks

   $ (18,565   $ (37,246

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

     74,326        81,060   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of period

   $ 55,761      $ 43,814   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

AMERIS BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Ameris Bancorp (the “Company” or “Ameris”) is a financial holding company headquartered in Moultrie, Georgia. Ameris conducts substantially all of its operations through its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Ameris Bank (the “Bank”). At September 30, 2011, the Bank operated 62 branches in select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. Our business model capitalizes on the efficiencies of a large financial services company while still providing the community with the personalized banking service expected by our customers. We manage our Bank through a balance of decentralized management responsibilities and efficient centralized operating systems, products and loan underwriting standards. Ameris’ Board of Directors and senior managers establish corporate policy, strategy and administrative policies. Within Ameris’ established guidelines and policies, the banker closest to the customer responds to the differing needs and demands of their unique market.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for Ameris have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statement presentation. The interim consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited, but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and the report of our registered independent public accounting firm included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Certain amounts reported for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation as of September 30, 2011. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or stockholders’ equity.

Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2011-01 - Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20 (“ASU 2011-01”). ASU 2011-01 temporarily delayed the effective date of the disclosures surrounding troubled debt restructurings in Update 2010-20 for public companies. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) deliberated on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring and coordinated that guidance with the effective date of the new disclosures, which are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. It did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

ASU 2011-02 - A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“ASU 2011-02”). ASU 2011-02 provides additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. ASU 2011-02 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and is to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying ASU 2011-02, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. It did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

ASU 2011-04 - Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 generally represents clarifications of Topic 820, but also includes some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. ASU 2011-04 results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is to be applied prospectively and is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 for public companies. It is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

ASU 2011-05 - Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 grants an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. ASU 2011-05 does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. For public entities, ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and is to be adopted retrospectively. It is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

 

5


Table of Contents

ASU 2011-08 – Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 grants an entity the option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. This conclusion can be used as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required in Topic 350. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. It is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on discounted cash flows or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. The accounting standard for disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The fair value hierarchy describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments and other accounts recorded based on their fair value:

Cash and Due From Banks, Federal Funds Sold and Interest-Bearing Accounts: The carrying amount of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing accounts approximates fair value.

Investment Securities Available for Sale: The fair value of securities available for sale is determined by various valuation methodologies. Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored enterprises and municipal bonds. The level 2 fair value pricing is provided by an independent third-party and is based upon similar securities in an active market. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy and include certain residual municipal securities and other less liquid securities.

Other Investments: Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock is included in other investments at its original cost basis, as cost approximates fair value and there is no ready market for such investments.

Loans: The carrying amount of variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated based on discounted expected future cash flows or underlying collateral values, where applicable. A loan is determined to be impaired if the Company believes it is probable that all principal and interest amounts due according to the terms of the loan will not be collected as scheduled. The fair value of impaired loans is determined in accordance with accounting standards and generally results in a specific reserve established through a charge to the provision for loan losses. Losses on impaired loans are charged to the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan is confirmed. Management has determined that the majority of impaired loans are Level 2 assets due to the extensive use of market appraisals. To the extent that market appraisals or other methods do not produce reliable determinations of fair value, these assets are deemed to be Level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned: The fair value of other real estate owned (“OREO”) is determined using certified appraisals that value the property at its highest and best uses by applying traditional valuation methods common to the industry. The Company does not hold any OREO for profit purposes and all other real estate is actively marketed for sale. In most cases, management has determined that additional write-downs are required beyond what is calculable from the appraisal to carry the property at levels that would attract buyers. Because this additional write-down is not based on observable inputs, management has determined that other real estate owned should be classified as Level 3.

 

6


Table of Contents

Covered Assets: Covered assets include loans and other real estate owned on which the majority of losses would be covered by loss-sharing agreements with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Management initially valued these assets at fair value using mostly unobservable inputs and, as such, has classified these assets as Level 3.

Intangible Assets and Goodwill: Intangible assets consist of core deposit premiums acquired in connection with business combinations and are based on the established value of acquired customer deposits. The core deposit premium is initially recognized based on a valuation performed as of the consummation date and is amortized over an estimated useful life of three to ten years. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized but instead are subject to an annual review for impairment.

FDIC Loss-Share Receivable: Because the FDIC will reimburse the Company for certain acquired loans should the Company experience a loss, an indemnification asset is recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset is recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans and measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The shared- loss agreements on the acquisition date reflect the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an appropriate discount rate which reflects counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties. The shared-loss agreements continue to be measured on the same basis as the related indemnified loans, and the loss-share receivable is impacted by changes in estimated cash flows associated with these loans.

Deposits: The carrying amount of demand deposits, savings deposits and variable-rate certificates of deposit approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using interest rates currently offered for certificates with similar maturities.

Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings: The carrying amount of variable rate borrowings and securities sold under repurchase agreements approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed rate other borrowings is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar borrowing arrangements.

Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures: The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate trust preferred securities approximates fair value.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are typically made using variable rates and have short maturities, the carrying value and fair value are immaterial for disclosure.

Derivatives: The Company has entered into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair value of the derivatives are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts and the discounted expected variable cash payments. The variable cash payments are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves derived from observable market interest rate curves).

The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting any applicable credit enhancements such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself or the counterparty. However, as of September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustment is not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuation in its entirety is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

7


Table of Contents

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, not shown elsewhere in these financial instruments, were as follows:

 

     September 30, 2011      December 31, 2010      September 30, 2010  
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
     Carrying
Amount
     Fair
Value
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

Financial assets:

                 

Loans, net

   $ 1,929,085       $ 1,907,017       $ 1,895,172       $ 1,905,346       $ 1,614,048       $ 1,622,871   

Financial liabilities:

                 

Deposits

     2,628,892         2,629,974         2,535,426         2,542,767         2,099,002         2,100,502   

Other borrowings

     21,000         20,814         43,495         43,685         —           —     

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

     Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
As of September 30, 2011
 
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

U.S. government agencies

   $ 20,309       $ —         $ 20,309       $ —     

State, county and municipal securities

     71,682         6,552         65,130         —     

Corporate debt securities

     11,528         —           9,528         2,000   

Mortgage backed securities

     237,320         6,044         231,276         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total recurring assets at fair value

   $ 340,839       $ 12,596       $ 326,243       $ 2,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
As of December 31, 2010
 
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

U.S. government agencies

   $ 35,468       $ —         $ 35,468       $ —     

State, county and municipal securities

     57,696         —           54,951         2,745   

Corporate debt securities

     10,786         —           8,786         2,000   

Mortgage backed securities

     218,631         —           218,631         —     

Derivative financial instruments

     936         —           936         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total recurring assets at fair value

   $ 323,517       $ —         $ 318,772       $ 4,745   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
As of September 30, 2010
 
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

U.S. government agencies

   $ 16,281       $ —         $ 16,281       $ —     

State, county and municipal securities

     48,772         —           48,772         —     

Corporate debt securities

     9,853         —           7,853         2,000   

Mortgage backed securities

     160,921         —           160,921         —     

Derivative financial instruments

     1,280         —           1,280         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total recurring assets at fair value

   $ 237,107       $ —         $ 235,107       $ 2,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

8


Table of Contents

The following table is a summary of instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, using the valuation hierarchy as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

     Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
As of September 30, 2011
 
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Impaired loans carried at fair value

   $ 58,648       $ —         $ 58,648       $ —     

Other real estate owned

     54,487         —           —           54,487   

Covered loans

     595,428         —           —           595,428   

Covered other real estate owned

     81,907         —           —           81,907   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-recurring assets at fair value

   $ 790,470       $ —         $ 58,648       $ 731,822   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
As of December 31, 2010
 
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Impaired loans carried at fair value

   $ 84,573       $ —         $ 84,573       $ —     

Other real estate owned

     57,915         —           —           57,915   

Covered loans

     554,991         —           —           554,991   

Covered other real estate owned

     54,931         —           —           54,931   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total nonrecurring assets at fair value

   $ 752,410       $ —         $ 84,573       $ 667,837   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
As of September 30, 2010
 
     Fair Value      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Impaired loans carried at fair value

   $ 77,947       $ —         $ 77,947       $ —     

Other real estate owned

     50,919         —           —           50,919   

Covered loans

     185,288         —           —           185,288   

Covered other real estate owned

     28,416         —           —           28,416   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total nonrecurring assets at fair value

   $ 342,570       $ —         $ 77,947       $ 264,623   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Below is the Company’s reconciliation of Level 3 assets as of September 30, 2011. Gains or losses on impaired loans are recorded in the provision for loan losses.

 

     Investment
Securities
Available
for Sale
    Other Real
Estate
Owned
    Covered
Loans
    Covered
Other Real
Estate
 

Beginning balance January 1, 2011

   $ 4,745      $ 57,915      $ 554,991      $ 54,931   

Total gains/(losses) included in net income

     —          (10,037     —          75   

Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net

     —          (23,423     63,286        4,052   

Transfers in or out of Level 3

     (2,745     30,032        (22,849     22,849   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance September 30, 2011

   $ 2,000      $ 54,487      $ 595,428      $ 81,907   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Ameris’ investment policy blends the Company’s liquidity needs and interest rate risk management with its desire to increase income and provide funds for expected growth in loans. The investment securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. government sponsored mortgage-backed securities and agencies, state, county and municipal securities and corporate debt securities. Ameris’ portfolio and investing philosophy concentrate activities in obligations where the credit risk is limited. For the small portion of Ameris’ portfolio found to present credit risk, the Company has reviewed the investments and financial performance of the obligors and believes the credit risk to be acceptable.

Management and the Company’s Asset and Liability Committee (the “ALCO Committee”) evaluate securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. While the majority of the unrealized losses on debt securities relate to changes in interest rates, corporate debt securities have also been affected by reduced levels of liquidity and higher risk premiums. Occasionally, management engages independent third parties to evaluate the Company’s position in certain corporate debt securities to aid management and the ALCO Committee in its determination regarding the status of impairment. The Company believes that each investment poses minimal credit risk and, further, that the Company does not intend to sell these investment securities at an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity. Therefore, at September 30, 2011, these investments are not considered impaired on an other-than temporary basis.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 are presented below:

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Gross
Unrealized
Gains
     Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

September 30, 2011:

          

U. S. government agencies

   $ 20,007       $ 302       $ —        $ 20,309   

State, county and municipal securities

     68,486         3,196         —          71,682   

Corporate debt securities

     11,638         247         (357     11,528   

Mortgage-backed securities

     230,786         6,838         (304     237,320   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total securities

   $ 330,917       $ 10,583       $ (661   $ 340,839   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2010:

          

U. S. government agencies

   $ 35,128       $ 448       $ (108   $ 35,468   

State, county and municipal securities

     57,385         928         (617     57,696   

Corporate debt securities

     13,540         123         (2,877     10,786   

Mortgage-backed securities

     213,737         6,732         (1,838     218,631   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total securities

   $ 319,790       $ 8,231       $ (5,440   $ 322,581   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

September 30, 2010:

          

U. S. government agencies

   $ 15,358       $ 923       $ —        $ 16,281   

State, county and municipal securities

     46,600         2,174         (2     48,772   

Corporate debt securities

     12,522         170         (2,839     9,853   

Mortgage-backed securities

     153,545         7,379         (3     160,921   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total securities

   $ 228,025       $ 10,646       $ (2,844   $ 235,827   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

10


Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2011 by contractual maturity are summarized in the table below. Expected maturities for mortgage-backed securities may differ from contractual maturities because in certain cases borrowers can prepay obligations without prepayment penalties. Therefore, these securities are not included in the following maturity summary:

 

     Amortized
Cost
     Fair
Value
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

Due in one year or less

   $ 13,902       $ 13,969   

Due from one year to five years

     17,772         18,406   

Due from five to ten years

     40,917         43,372   

Due after ten years

     27,540         27,772   

Mortgage-backed securities

     230,786         237,320   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 330,917       $ 340,839   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Securities with a carrying value of approximately $177.6 million serve as collateral to secure public deposits and other purposes required or permitted by law at September 30, 2011.

The following table details the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities aggregated by category and duration of continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010.

 

     Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
Description of Securities    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value
     Unrealized
Losses
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

September 30, 2011:

               

U. S. government agencies

   $ —         $ —        $ —         $ —        $ —         $ —     

State, county and municipal securities

     —           —          —           —          —           —     

Corporate debt securities

     100         —          6,732         (357     6,832         (357

Mortgage-backed securities

     33,741         (304     —           —          33,741         (304
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 33,841       $ (304   $ 6,732       $ (357   $ 40,573       $ (661
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2010:

               

U. S. government agencies

   $ 25,017       $ (108   $ —         $ —        $ 25,017       $ (108

State, county and municipal securities

     17,563         (617     —           —          17,563         (617

Corporate debt securities

     1,048         (20     5,078         (2,857     6,126         (2,877

Mortgage-backed securities

     64,549         (1,838     15         —          64,564         (1,838
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 108,177       $ (2,583   $ 5,093       $ (2,857   $ 113,270       $ (5,440
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

September 30, 2010:

               

U. S. government agencies

   $ —         $ —        $ —         $ —        $ —         $ —     

State, county and municipal securities

     1,205         (2     —           —          1,205         (2

Corporate debt securities

     99         (1     5,153         (2,838     5,252         (2,839

Mortgage-backed securities

     1,615         (3     15         —          1,630         (3
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 2,919       $ (6   $ 5,168       $ (2,838   $ 8,087       $ (2,844
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

11


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 – LOANS

The Company engages in a full complement of lending activities, including real estate-related loans, agriculture-related loans, commercial and financial loans and consumer installment loans within select markets in Georgia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. Ameris concentrates the majority of its lending activities in real estate loans. While risk of loss in the Company’s portfolio is primarily tied to the credit quality of the various borrowers, risk of loss may increase due to factors beyond Ameris’ control, such as local, regional and/or national economic downturns. General conditions in the real estate market may also impact the relative risk in the real estate portfolio.

Commercial, financial and agricultural loans include both secured and unsecured loans for working capital, expansion, crop production, and other business purposes. Short-term working capital loans are secured by non-real estate collateral such as accounts receivable, crops, inventory and equipment. The Company evaluates the financial strength, cash flow, management, credit history of the borrower and the quality of the collateral securing the loan. The Bank often requires personal guarantees and secondary sources of repayment on commercial, financial and agricultural loans.

Real estate loans include construction and development loans, commercial and farmland loans and residential loans. Construction and development loans include loans for the development of residential neighborhoods, construction of one-to-four family residential construction loans to builders and consumers, and commercial real estate construction loans, primarily for owner-occupied properties. The Company limits its construction lending risk through adherence to established underwriting procedures. Commercial real estate loans include loans secured by owner-occupied commercial buildings for office, storage, retail, farmland and warehouse space. They also include non-owner occupied commercial buildings such as leased retail and office space. Commercial real estate loans may be larger in size and may involve a greater degree of risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Payments on such loans are often dependent on successful operation or management of the properties. The Company’s residential loans represent permanent mortgage financing and are secured by residential properties located within the Bank’s market areas.

Consumer installment loans and other loans include automobile loans, boat and recreational vehicle financing, and both secured and unsecured personal loans. Consumer loans carry greater risks than other loans, as the collateral can consists of rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles and equipment that may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the loan in the case of default.

Loans are stated at unpaid balances, net of unearned income and deferred loan fees. Balances within the major loans receivable categories are presented in the following table:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 

Commercial, financial and agricultural

   $ 159,020       $ 142,312       $ 152,812   

Real estate – construction and development

     145,770         162,594         178,532   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     677,048         683,974         721,368   

Real estate – residential

     331,236         344,830         348,737   

Consumer installment

     38,163         34,293         54,681   

Other

     17,658         6,754         6,702   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 1,368,895       $ 1,374,757       $ 1,462,832   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans are defined as loans that were acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC. Covered loans totaling $595.4 million, $555.0 million and $185.3 million at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively, are not included in the above schedule.

Covered loans are shown below according to loan type as of the end of the periods shown:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 

Commercial, financial and agricultural

   $ 49,859       $ 47,309       $ 16,506   

Real estate – construction and development

     82,933         89,781         43,047   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     323,760         257,428         90,158   

Real estate – residential

     135,318         149,226         27,736   

Consumer installment

     3,558         11,247         7,841   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 595,428       $ 554,991       $ 185,288   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

12


Table of Contents

Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans

A loan is placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s judgment, the collection of the interest income appears doubtful. Interest receivable that has been accrued and is subsequently determined to have doubtful collectability is charged to interest income. Interest on loans that are classified as non-accrual is recognized when received. Past due loans are loans whose principal or interest is past due 90 days or more. In some cases, where borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties, loans may be restructured to provide terms significantly different from the original contractual terms.

The following table presents an analysis of non-covered loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 

Commercial, financial and agricultural

   $ 4,570       $ 8,648       $ 7,752   

Real estate – construction and development

     15,789         7,887         30,359   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     24,450         55,170         37,086   

Real estate – residential

     13,529         6,376         13,752   

Consumer installment

     729         1,208         733   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 59,067       $ 79,289       $ 89,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents an analysis of covered loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 

Commercial, financial and agricultural

   $ 12,136       $ 5,756       $ 795   

Real estate – construction and development

     32,878         25,810         8,936   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     63,940         29,519         14,706   

Real estate – residential

     34,846         25,946         7,852   

Consumer installment

     451         1,122         682   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 144,251       $ 88,153       $ 32,971   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

The following table presents an analysis of non-covered past due loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Loans
30-59
Days  Past
Due
     Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
     Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
     Total
Loans
Past Due
     Current
Loans
     Total
Loans
     Loans 90
Days or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of September 30, 2011:

                    

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 657       $ 884       $ 4,544       $ 6,085       $ 152,935       $ 159,020       $ —     

Real estate – construction & development

     1,228         1,759         15,050         18,037         127,733         145,770         —     

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     6,755         2,594         22,777         32,126         644,922         677,048         —     

Real estate – residential

     5,581         2,476         12,706         20,763         310,473         331,236         —     

Consumer installment loans

     475         260         661         1,396         36,767         38,163         20  

Other

     —           —           —           —           17,658         17,658         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 14,696       $ 7,973       $ 55,738       $ 78,407       $ 1,290,488       $ 1,368,895       $ 20  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Loans
30-59
Days  Past
Due
     Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
     Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
     Total
Loans
Past Due
     Current
Loans
     Total
Loans
     Loans 90
Days or
More Past

Due and
Still
Accruing
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of December 31, 2010:

                    

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 898       $ 120       $ 6,746       $ 7,764       $ 134,548       $ 142,312       $ —     

Real estate – construction & development

     2,121         2,039         19,458         23,618         138,976         162,594         —     

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     1,740         3,725         25,914         31,379         652,595         683,974         —     

Real estate – residential

     3,384         3,066         14,393         20,843         323,987         344,830         —     

Consumer installment loans

     493         142         475         1,110         33,183         34,293         3   

Other

     —           —           —           —           6,754         6,754         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 8,636       $ 9,092       $ 66,986       $ 84,714       $ 1,290,043       $ 1,374,757       $ 3   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

There was no material amount of non-covered loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing interest at September 30, 2010.

 

14


Table of Contents

The following table presents an analysis of covered past due loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
     Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
     Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
     Total
Loans
Past Due
     Current
Loans
     Total
Loans
     Loans 90
Days  or
More Past
Due  and
Still
Accruing
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of September 30, 2011:

                    

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 290       $ 411       $ 11,406       $ 12,107       $ 37,752       $ 49,859       $ 5  

Real estate – construction & development

     1,175         2,610         30,220         34,005         48,928         82,933         347  

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     16,316         7,790         54,009         78,115         245,645         323,760         339  

Real estate – residential

     8,180         2,717         32,570         43,467         91,851         135,318         2,039  

Consumer installment loans

     72         73         422         567         2,991         3,558         —     

Other

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 26,033       $ 13,601       $ 128,627       $ 168,261       $ 427,167       $ 595,428       $   2,730  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Loans
30-59
Days Past
Due
     Loans
60-89
Days
Past Due
     Loans 90
or More
Days Past
Due
     Total
Loans
Past Due
     Current
Loans
     Total
Loans
     Loans 90
Days  or
More Past
Due and
Still
Accruing
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of December 31, 2010:

                    

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 2,531       $ 3,954       $ 4,914       $ 11,399       $ 35,910       $ 47,309       $ 3,355  

Real estate – construction & development

     1,464         5,254         11,866         18,584         71,197         89,781         5,038  

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     4,834         19,628         20,979         45,441         211,987         257,428         5,712  

Real estate – residential

     5,186         4,135         10,277         19,598         129,628         149,226         2,145  

Consumer installment loans

     606         158         1,092         1,856         9,391         11,247         133  

Other

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 14,621       $ 33,129       $   49,128       $   96,878       $ 458,113       $ 554,991       $ 16,383  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired Loans

Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. When determining if the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, the Company considers the borrower’s capacity to pay, which includes such factors as the borrower’s current financial statements, an analysis of global cash flow sufficient to pay all debt obligations and an evaluation of secondary sources of repayment, such as guarantor support and collateral value. Impaired loans include loans on nonaccrual status and troubled debt restructurings. The Company individually assesses for impairment all non-accrual loans greater than $200,000 and rated substandard or worse and all troubled debt restructurings greater than $100,000. If a loan is deemed impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis.

 

15


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of information pertaining to non-covered impaired loans:

 

     As of and For the Period Ended  
     September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

Nonaccrual loans

   $ 59,067       $ 79,289       $ 89,862   

Troubled debt restructurings not included above

     16,591         21,972         5,594   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

   $ 75,658       $ 101,261       $ 95,456   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired loans not requiring a related allowance

   $ —         $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired loans requiring a related allowance

   $ 75,658       $ 101,261       $ 95,456   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Allowance related to impaired loans

   $ 17,010       $ 16,688       $ 17,509   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Average investment in impaired loans

   $ 88,207       $ 103,776       $ 104,404   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest income recognized on impaired loans

   $ 847       $ 545       $ 434   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Foregone interest income on impaired loans

   $ 202       $ 3,828       $ 2,099   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to non-covered impaired loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Unpaid
Contractual
Principal

Balance
     Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
     Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
     Total
Recorded
Investment
     Related
Allowance
     Average
Recorded
Investment
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of September 30, 2011:

                 

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 8,895       $ —         $ 4,571       $ 4,571       $ 1,277       $ 5,848   

Real estate – construction & development

     26,450         —           17,486         17,486         6,164         19,417   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     35,835         —           31,455         31,455         4,470         41,488   

Real estate – residential

     23,871         —           21,436         21,436         4,933         20,837   

Consumer installment loans

     875         —           710         710         166         617   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $   95,926       $ —         $   75,658       $   75,658       $ 17,010       $   88,207   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
     Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
     Total
Recorded
Investment
     Related
Allowance
     Average
Recorded
Investment
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of December 31, 2010:

                 

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 9,983       $ —         $ 6,985       $ 6,985       $ 1,649       $ 6,845   

Real estate – construction & development

     38,060         —           23,485         23,485         4,023         35,315   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     57,224         —           50,626         50,626         6,795         40,475   

Real estate – residential

     22,819         —           19,632         19,632         4,085         20,401   

Consumer installment loans

     738         —           533         533         136         740   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 128,824       $ —         $ 101,261       $ 101,261       $ 16,688       $ 103,776   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of information pertaining to covered impaired loans:

 

     As of and For the Period Ended  
     September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

Nonaccrual loans

   $ 144,251       $ 88,153       $ 32,971   

Troubled debt restructurings not included above

     10,768         169         15   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

   $ 155,019       $ 88,322       $ 32,986   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired loans not requiring a related allowance

   $ 155,019       $ 88,322       $ 32,986   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired loans requiring a related allowance

   $ —         $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Allowance related to impaired loans

   $ —         $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Average investment in impaired loans

   $ 128,717       $ 44,184       $ 29,471   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest income recognized on impaired loans

   $ 462       $ 6       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Foregone interest income on impaired loans

   $ 1,515       $ 1,251       $ 1,212   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents an analysis of information pertaining to covered impaired loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
     Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
     Total
Recorded
Investment
     Related
Allowance
     Average
Recorded
Investment
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of September 30, 2011:

                 

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 19,904       $ 12,194       $ —         $ 12,194       $ —         $ 9,756   

Real estate – construction & development

     111,148         33,380         —           33,380         —           29,672   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     135,514         65,592         —           65,592         —           49,573   

Real estate – residential

     72,962         43,402         —           43,402         —           38,775   

Consumer installment loans

     581         451         —           451         —           941   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 340,109       $ 155,019       $ —         $ 155,019       $ —         $ 128,717   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
     Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance
     Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance
     Total
Recorded
Investment
     Related
Allowance
     Average
Recorded
Investment
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

As of December 31, 2010:

                 

Commercial, financial & agricultural

   $ 10,974       $ 5,756       $ —         $ 5,756       $ —         $ 2,025   

Real estate – construction & development

     64,904         25,810         —           25,810         —           12,071   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     49,381         29,519         —           29,519         —           17,717   

Real estate – residential

     48,148         26,115         —           26,115         —           11,579   

Consumer installment loans

     1,268         1,122         —           1,122         —           792   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 174,675       $   88,322       $ —         $   88,322       $ —         $   44,184   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

17


Table of Contents

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company uses a nine category risk grading system to assign a risk grade to each loan in the portfolio. The following is a description of the general characteristics of the grades:

Grade 10 – Prime Credit – This grade represents loans to the Company’s most creditworthy borrowers or loans that are secured by cash or cash equivalents.

Grade 15 – Good Credit – This grade includes loans that exhibit one or more characteristics better than that of a Satisfactory Credit. Generally, debt service coverage and borrower’s liquidity is materially better than required by the Company’s loan policy.

Grade 20 – Satisfactory Credit – This grade is assigned to loans to borrowers who exhibit satisfactory credit histories, contain acceptable loan structures and demonstrate ability to repay.

Grade 25 – Minimum Acceptable Credit – This grade includes loans which exhibit all the characteristics of a Satisfactory Credit, but warrant more than normal level of banker supervision due to: (i) circumstances which elevate the risks of performance (such as start-up operations, untested management, heavy leverage, interim losses); (ii) adverse, extraordinary events that have affected, or could affect, the borrower’s cash flow, financial condition, ability to continue operating profitability or refinancing (such as death of principal, fire, divorce); (iii) loans that require more than the normal servicing requirements (such as any type of construction financing, acquisition and development loans, accounts receivable or inventory loans and floor plan loans); (iv) existing technical exceptions which raise some doubts about the Bank’s perfection in its collateral position or the continued financial capacity of the borrower; or (v) improvements in formerly criticized borrowers, which may warrant banker supervision.

Grade 28 – Performing, Under-Collateralized Credit – This grade is assigned to loans that are currently performing and supported by adequate financial information that reflects repayment capacity but exhibits a loan-to-value ratio greater than 110%, based on a documented collateral valuation.

Grade 30 – Other Asset Especially Mentioned – This grade includes loans that exhibit potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Company’s credit position at some future date.

Grade 40 – Substandard – This grade represents loans which are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. These assets exhibit a well-defined weakness or are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These weaknesses may be characterized by past due performance, operating losses or questionable collateral values.

Grade 50 – Doubtful – This grade includes loans which exhibit all of the characteristics of a substandard loan with the added provision that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable or improbable.

Grade 60 – Loss – This grade is assigned to loans which are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as active assets of the Bank is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loss has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing it off.

The following table presents the non-covered loan portfolio by risk grade as of September 30, 2011:

 

Risk Grade

   Commercial,
financial &
agricultural
     Real estate -
construction &
development
     Real estate -
commercial  &
farmland
     Real estate  -
residential
     Consumer
installment  loans
     Other      Total  
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

10

   $ 16,047       $ 211       $ 905       $ 109       $ 6,189       $ —         $ 23,461   

15

     12,135         4,814         146,029         29,930         973         —           193,881   

20

     67,085         35,764         277,651         130,731         21,859         17,658         550,748   

25

     55,307         69,618         169,887         122,939         7,391         —           425,142   

28

     1,192         8,043         9,290         11,985         28         —           30,538   

30

     1,738         4,291         35,550         10,583         598         —           52,760   

40

     5,376         22,753         37,736         24,959         1,033         —           91,857   

50

     140         276         —           —           92         —           508   

60

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 159,020       $ 145,770       $ 677,048       $ 331,236       $ 38,163       $ 17,658       $ 1,368,895   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

18


Table of Contents

The following table presents the non-covered loan portfolio by risk grade as of December 31, 2010:

 

Risk Grade

   Commercial,
financial  &
agricultural
     Real estate  -
construction &
development
     Real estate -
commercial  &
farmland
     Real estate  -
residential
     Consumer
installment  loans
     Other      Total  
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

10

   $ 17,739       $ 211       $ 1,109       $ 110       $ 5,507       $ —         $ 24,676   

15

     11,191         3,006         145,376         40,783         858         —           201,214   

20

     48,738         39,407         274,817         118,179         18,566         6,754         506,461   

25

     53,957         73,589         168,273         137,416         8,261         —           441,496   

28

     2,246         7,696         9,159         6,197         31         —           25,329   

30

     998         6,437         29,029         17,069         273         —           53,806   

40

     6,633         32,009         56,090         25,076         791         —           120,599   

50

     810         239         120         —           6         —           1,175   

60

     —           —           1         —           —           —           1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 142,312       $ 162,594       $ 683,974       $ 344,830       $ 34,293       $   6,754       $ 1,374,757   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the covered loan portfolio by risk grade as of September 30, 2011:

 

Risk Grade

   Commercial,
financial  &
agricultural
     Real estate  -
construction &
development
     Real estate -
commercial  &
farmland
     Real estate  -
residential
     Consumer
installment  loans
     Other      Total  
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

10

   $ 587       $ —         $ —         $ 1,376       $ 578       $ —         $ 2,541   

15

     31         53         1,799         633         16         —           2,532   

20

     4,602         5,615         31,938         20,911         557         —           63,623   

25

     22,142         22,664         141,921         51,260         1,386         —           239,373   

28

     —           54         1,478         690         —           —           2,222   

30

     5,810         12,831         41,679         8,705         198         —           69,223   

40

     16,683         40,571         104,008         51,743         823         —           213,828   

50

     4         1,145         937         —           —           —           2,086   

60

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $   49,859       $   82,933       $ 323,760       $ 135,318       $   3,558       $      —         $    595,428   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the covered loan portfolio by risk grade as of December 31, 2010:

 

Risk Grade

   Commercial,
financial  &
agricultural
     Real estate  -
construction &
development
     Real estate -
commercial  &
farmland
     Real estate  -
residential
     Consumer
installment  loans
     Other      Total  
     (Dollars in Thousands)  

10

   $ 1,297       $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 1,241       $ —         $ 2,538   

15

     124         —           —           —           35         —           159   

20

     957         4,245         15,961         5,861         1,865         —           28,889   

25

     30,333         28,918         130,540         78,665         6,231         —           274,687   

28

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —     

30

     3,099         7,690         38,275         22,385         396         —           71,845   

40

     11,495         48,928         72,652         42,233         1,479         —           176,787   

50

     4         —           —           82         —           —           86   

60

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $   47,309       $   89,781       $ 257,428       $ 149,226       $ 11,247       $      —         $    554,991   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

19


Table of Contents

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if both (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and (ii) the Company has granted a concession that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions may include interest rate reductions to below market interest rates, principal forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules and other actions intended to minimize potential losses. The Company has exhibited the greatest success for rehabilitation of the loan by a reduction in the rate alone (maintaining the amortization of the debt) or a combination of a rate reduction and the forbearance of previously past due interest or principal. This has most typically been evidenced in certain commercial real estate loans whereby a disruption in the borrower’s cash flow resulted in an extended past due status, of which the borrower was unable to catch up completely as the cash flow of the property ultimately stabilized at a level lower than its original level. A reduction in rate, coupled with a forbearance of unpaid principal and/or interest, allowed the net cash flows to service the debt under the modified terms.

The Company’s policy requires a restructure request to be supported by a current, well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and a collateral evaluation that is no older than six-months from the date of the restructure. Key factors of that evaluation include the documentation of current, recurring cash flows, support provided by the guarantor(s) and the current valuation of the collateral. If the appraisal in file is older than six-months, an evaluation must be made as to the continued reasonableness of the valuation. For certain income-producing properties, current rent rolls and/or other income information can be utilized to support the appraisal valuation, when coupled with documented cap rates within our markets and a physical inspection of the collateral to validate the current condition.

The Company’s policy states in the event a loan has been identified as a troubled debt restructuring, it should be assigned a grade of substandard and placed on nonaccrual status until such time that the borrower has demonstrated the ability to service the loan payments based on the restructured terms – generally defined as six-months of satisfactory payment history. Missed payments under the original loan terms are not considered under the new structure; however, subsequent missed payments are considered non-performance and are not considered toward the six-month required term of satisfactory payment history. The Company’s loan policy states that a nonaccrual loan may be returned to accrual status when (i) none of its principal and interest is due and unpaid, and the Company expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest, or (ii) when it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection. Restoration to accrual status on any given loan must be supported by a well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and the prospects for full repayment, approved by the Company’s Senior Credit Officer.

In the normal course of business, the Company renews loans with a modification of the interest rate or terms that are not deemed as troubled debt restructurings because the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulty. The Company modified loans in the first nine months of 2011 totaling $27.0 million and loans in 2010 totaling $23.8 million under such parameters. In addition, the Company offers consumer loan customers an annual skip-a-pay program that is based on certain qualifying parameters and not based on financial difficulties. The Company does not treat these as troubled debt restructurings.

The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by loan class, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

 

As of September 30, 2011    Accruing Loans      Non-Accruing Loans  

Loan class:

   #      Balance
(in thousands)
     #      Balance
(in thousands)
 

Real estate – construction & development

     5         1,697             4         1,426   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     10         7,005         3         5,392   

Real estate - residential

     23         7,889         1         227   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     38       $ 16,591         8       $ 7,045   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010    Accruing Loans      Non-Accruing Loans  

Loan class:

   #      Balance
(in thousands)
     #      Balance
(in thousands)
 

Real estate – construction & development

     2         786             2         2,290   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     15         19,262         3         2,864   

Real estate - residential

     9         1,924         1         316   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     26       $ 21,972         6       $ 5,470   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

20


Table of Contents

The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by types of concessions made, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

 

As of September 30, 2011    Accruing Loans      Non-Accruing Loans  

Type of Concession:

   #      Balance
(in thousands)
     #      Balance
(in thousands)
 

Forbearance of Interest

     1       $ 316         —         $ —     

Forgiveness of Principal

     2         889         1         136   

Payment Modification Only

     2         399         —           —     

Rate Reduction Only

     11         6,027         2         690   

Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest

     9         7,360         —           —     

Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal

     13         1,600         —           —     

Rate Reduction, Payment Modification

     —           —           5         6,219   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     38       $ 16,591         8       $ 7,045   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010    Accruing Loans      Non-Accruing Loans  

Type of Concession:

   #      Balance
(in thousands)
     #      Balance
(in thousands)
 

Forbearance of Interest

     —         $ —           2       $ 722   

Forgiveness of Principal

     4         1,145         —           —     

Payment Modification Only

     3         232         —           —     

Rate Reduction Only

     5         5,985         —           —     

Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Interest

     7         6,207         1         1,615   

Rate Reduction, Forbearance of Principal

     1         596         —           —     

Rate Reduction, Payment Modification

     6         7,807         3         3,133   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     26       $ 21,972         6       $ 5,470   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the amount of troubled debt restructurings by collateral types, classified separately as accrual and non-accrual at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

 

As of September 30, 2011    Accruing Loans      Non-Accruing Loans  

Collateral type:

   #      Balance
(in thousands)
     #      Balance
(in thousands)
 

Apartments

     —         $ —           —         $ —     

Raw Land

     5         1,697         4         1,426   

Hotel & Motel

     1         518         1         2,072   

Office

     3         1,006         —           —     

Retail, including Strip Centers

     6         5,481         2         3,320   

1-4 Family Residential

     23         7,889         1         227   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     38       $ 16,591         8       $ 7,045   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2010    Accruing Loans      Non-Accruing Loans  

Collateral type:

   #      Balance
(in thousands)
     #      Balance
(in thousands)
 

Apartments

     3       $ 3,770         —         $ —     

Raw Land

     6         2,429         2         2,290   

Hotel & Motel

     2         4,199         1         2,072   

Office

     —           —           2         792   

Retail, including Strip Centers

     6         9,650         —           —     

1-4 Family Residential

     9         1,924         1         316   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     26       $ 21,972         6       $ 5,470   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a balance of $23.6 million and $27.4 million, respectively, in troubled debt restructurings. The Company has recorded $1.3 million and $2.6 million in previous charge-offs on such loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company’s balance in the allowance for loan losses allocated to such troubled debt restructurings was $3.5 million and $3.3 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on non-accruing, past due and other loans that management believes might be potentially impaired or warrant additional attention. The Company segregates the loan portfolio by type of loan and utilizes this segregation in evaluating exposure to risks within the portfolio. In addition, based on internal reviews and external reviews performed by independent auditors and regulatory authorities, the Company further segregates the loan portfolio by loan grades based on an assessment of risk for a particular loan or group of loans. Certain reviewed loans are assigned specific allowances when a review of relevant data determines that a general allocation is not sufficient. In establishing allowances, management considers historical loan loss experience but adjusts this data with a significant emphasis on data such as current loan quality trends, current economic conditions and other factors in the markets where the Company operates. Factors considered include, among others, current valuations of real estate in their markets, unemployment rates, the effect of weather conditions on agricultural related entities and other significant local economic events.

The Company has developed a methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses which is monitored by the Company’s Senior Credit Officer. Procedures provide for the assignment of a risk rating for every loan included in the total loan portfolio, with the exception of credit card receivables and overdraft protection loans which are treated as pools for risk rating purposes. The risk rating schedule provides nine ratings of which five ratings are classified as pass ratings and four ratings are classified as criticized ratings. Each risk rating is assigned a percentage factor to be applied to the loan balance to determine the adequate amount of reserve. Many of the larger loans require an annual review by an independent loan officer or an independent third party loan review firm. As a result of these loan reviews, certain loans may be assigned specific reserve allocations. Other loans that surface as problem loans may also be assigned specific reserves. Past due loans are assigned risk ratings based on the number of days past due. The calculation of the allowance for loan losses, including underlying data and assumptions, is reviewed regularly by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and the Director of Internal Audit.

Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the collection of a loan’s principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance. Consumer loans are charged-off in accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (“FFIEC”) Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy. Commercial loans are charged-off when they are deemed uncollectible, which usually involves a triggering event within the collection effort. If the loan is collateral dependent, the loss is more easily identified and is charged-off when it is identified, usually based upon receipt of an appraisal. However, when a loan has guarantor support, the Company may carry the estimated loss as a reserve against the loan while collection efforts with the guarantor are pursued. If, after collection efforts with the guarantor are complete, the deficiency is still considered uncollectible, the loss is charged-off and any further collections are treated as recoveries. In all situations, when a loan is downgraded to an Asset Quality Rating of 60 (Loss per the regulatory guidance), the uncollectible portion is charged-off.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 

Balance, January 1

   $ 34,576      $ 35,762      $ 35,762   

Provision for loan losses charged to expense

     22,098        48,839        39,117   

Loans charged off

     (22,714     (52,623     (43,130

Recoveries of loans previously charged off

     1,278        2,598        2,323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 35,238      $ 34,576      $ 34,072   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the year ended December 31, 2010, and the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded provision for loan loss expense of $1.6 million, $1.7 million, and $1.0 million respectively, to account for losses where the initial estimate of cash flows was found to be excessive on loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions. These amounts are excluded from the rollforwards above and below but are reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

22


Table of Contents

The following table details activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

 

     Commercial,
financial  &
agricultural
    Real estate  -
construction &
development
    Real estate -
commercial  &
farmland
    Real estate  -
residential
    Consumer
installment
loans and
Other
    Total  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Balance, January 1, 2011

   $ 2,779      $ 7,705      $ 14,971      $ 8,664      $ 457      $ 34,576   

Provision for loan losses

     3,586        7,615        6,447        3,931        519        22,098   

Loans charged off

     (3,855     (6,859     (7,851     (3,641     (508     (22,714

Recoveries of loans previously charged off

     153        873        43        107        102        1,278   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2011

   $ 2,663      $ 9,334      $ 13,610      $ 9,061      $ 570      $ 35,238   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Period-end amount allocated to:

            

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 903      $ 5,209      $ 4,580      $ 3,332      $ 1      $ 14,025   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     1,760        4,125        9,030        5,729        569        21,213   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 2,663      $ 9,334      $ 13,610      $ 9,061      $ 570      $ 35,238   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans:

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 3,214      $ 13,979      $ 31,892      $ 15,468      $ 17      $ 64,570   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

     155,806        131,791        645,156        315,768        55,804        1,304,325   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 159,020      $ 145,770      $ 677,048      $ 331,236      $ 55,821      $ 1,368,895   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Commercial,
financial  &
agricultural
    Real estate  -
construction &
development
    Real estate -
commercial  &
farmland
    Real estate  -
residential
    Consumer
installment
loans and
Other
    Total  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Balance, January 1, 2010

   $ 3,428      $ 13,098      $ 11,296      $ 7,391      $ 549      $ 35,762   

Provision for loan losses

     4,265        13,776        18,937        11,178        683        48,839   

Loans charged off

     (5,481     (19,853     (16,108     (10,091     (1,090     (52,623

Recoveries of loans previously charged off

     567        684        846        186        315        2,598   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

   $ 2,779      $ 7,705      $ 14,971      $ 8,664      $ 457      $ 34,576   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Period-end amount allocated to:

            

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 677      $ 3,554      $ 6,300      $ 2,554      $ —        $ 13,085   

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

     2,102        4,151        8,671        6,110        457        21,491   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 2,779      $ 7,705      $ 14,971      $ 8,664      $ 457      $ 34,576   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans:

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

   $ 3,930      $ 22,838      $ 50,179      $ 14,740      $ —        $ 91,687   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

     138,382        139,756        633,795        330,090        41,047        1,283,070   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 142,312      $ 162,594      $ 683,974      $ 344,830      $ 41,047      $ 1,374,757   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

23


Table of Contents

NOTE 4 – ASSETS ACQUIRED IN FDIC-ASSISTED ACQUISITIONS

From October 2009 through July 2011, the Company participated in eight FDIC-assisted acquisitions whereby the Company purchased certain failed institutions out of the FDIC’s receivership. These institutions include:

 

Bank Acquired

  

Location:

  

Branches:

  

Date Acquired

American United Bank (“AUB”)

   Lawrenceville, Ga.    1    October 23, 2009

United Security Bank (“USB”)

   Sparta, Ga.    2    November 6, 2009

Satilla Community Bank (“SCB”)

   St. Marys, Ga.    1    May 14, 2010

First Bank of Jacksonville (“FBJ”)

   Jacksonville, Fl.    2    October 22, 2010

Tifton Banking Company (“TBC”)

   Tifton, Ga.    1    November 12, 2010

Darby Bank & Trust (“DBT”)

   Vidalia, Ga.    7    November 12, 2010

High Trust Bank (“HTB”)

   Stockbridge, Ga.    2    July 15, 2011

One Georgia Bank (“OGB”)

   Midtown Atlanta, Ga.    1    July 15, 2011

On July 15, 2011, the Bank purchased substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all the liabilities of High Trust Bank (“HTB”) and One Georgia Bank (“OGB”) from the FDIC, as Receiver of HTB and OGB. HTB operated branches in Stockbridge and Leary, Georgia. OGB operated one branch in Midtown Atlanta, Georgia. The Company’s agreements with the FDIC included shared-loss agreements which affords the Bank significant protection from losses associated with loans and OREO. Under the terms of the shared-loss agreements, the FDIC will absorb 80% of all losses and share 80% of all loss recoveries. The shared-loss agreement applicable to single family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and reimbursement by the Bank to the FDIC for ten years. The shared-loss agreement applicable to commercial loans and securities provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years and reimbursement by the Bank to the FDIC for eight years.

The estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are shown below:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   High Trust Bank      One Georgia Bank  

Assets acquired:

     

Cash and due from banks

   $ 6,204       $ 7,243   

Federal funds sold

     —           5,070   

Securities available for sale

     14,770         28,891   

Loans

     84,732         74,843   

Foreclosed property

     10,272         7,242   

Estimated FDIC indemnification asset

     49,485         45,488   

Other assets

     1,772         2,933   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Assets acquired

     167,235         171,710   

Cash received (paid) to settle the acquisition

     30,228         (5,658
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value of assets acquired

   $ 197,463       $ 166,052   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities assumed:

     

Deposits

   $ 175,887       $ 136,101   

Other borrowings

     —           21,107   

Other liabilities

     2,654         899   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value of liabilities assumed

   $ 178,541       $ 158,107   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net assets acquired / gain from acquisition

   $ 18,922       $ 7,945   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company’s bid to acquire the assets of HTB included a discount of approximately $33.5 million, and the Company received a $30.2 million cash payment from the FDIC to settle the acquisition. The Company’s bid to acquire the assets of OGB included a discount of approximately $22.5 million, and the Company paid the FDIC $5.7 million in cash to settle the acquisition.

The shared-loss agreements are subject to the servicing procedures as specified in the agreements with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the HTB and OGB loss-sharing agreements were recorded as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair values of $49.5 million and $45.5 million, respectively, on the acquisition date. Based upon the acquisition date fair values of the net assets acquired, no goodwill was recorded on either transaction.

 

24


Table of Contents

The HTB and OGB transactions resulted in before-tax gains of $18.9 million and $7.9 million, respectively, which are included in the Company’s September 30, 2011 Consolidated Statement of Operations. Due to the difference in tax bases of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the Bank recorded deferred tax liabilities with respect to HTB and OGB of $6.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively, resulting in after-tax gains of $12.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively.

The determination of the initial fair values of loans at the acquisition date and the initial fair values of the related FDIC indemnification assets involves a high degree of judgment and complexity. The carrying values of the acquired loans and the FDIC indemnification assets reflect management’s best estimate of the fair value of each of these assets as of the date of acquisition. However, the amount that the Company realizes on these assets could differ materially from the carrying values reflected in the financial statements included in this report, based upon the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. Because of the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC on these assets, the Company does not expect to incur any significant losses. To the extent the actual values realized for the acquired loans are different from the estimates, the indemnification assets will generally be affected in an offsetting manner due to the loss-sharing support from the FDIC.

FASB ASC 310 – 30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“ASC 310”), applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. ASC 310 prohibits carrying over or creating an allowance for loan losses upon initial recognition for loans which fall under the scope of this statement. At the acquisition dates, a majority of these loans were valued based on the liquidation value of the underlying collateral because the future cash flows are primarily based on the liquidation of underlying collateral. There was no allowance for credit losses established related to these ASC 310 loans at the acquisition dates, based on the provisions of this statement. Over the life of the acquired loans, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected. If the expected cash flows expected to be collected increases, the Company adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s remaining life. If the expected cash flows expected to be collected decreases, the Company records a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of operations.

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimates of the contractually required payments receivable for all ASC 310 loans acquired in the HTB acquisition totaled $136.9 million and the estimated fair values of the loans totaled $74.2 million, net of an accretable yield of $13.3 million, the difference between the value of the loans on the Company’s balance sheet and the cash flows they are expected to produce. On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimates of the contractually required payments receivable for all ASC 310 loans acquired in the OGB acquisition totaled $104.9 million and the estimated fair values of the loans totaled $49.9 million, net of an accretable yield of $9.3 million, the difference between the value of the loans on the Company’s balance sheet and the cash flows they are expected to produce. These amounts were determined based upon the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments.

The estimated fair values of loans acquired in the HTB and OGB acquisitions are detailed below based on their initial estimate of credit quality (dollars in thousands):

 

     Loans with
deterioration
of credit
quality
     Loans
without a
deterioration
of credit
quality
     Total
loans, at
fair value
 

High Trust Bank:

        

Commercial, industrial, agricultural

   $ 153       $ 242       $ 395   

Real estate – residential

     5,025         3,525         8,550   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     62,472         5,898         68,370   

Construction & development

     6,508         53         6,561   

Consumer

     58         798         856   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 74,216       $ 10,516       $ 84,732   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

One Georgia Bank:

        

Commercial, industrial, agricultural

   $ 9,263       $ 1,471       $ 10,734   

Real estate – residential

     4,308         1,745         6,053   

Real estate – commercial & farmland

     31,313         17,971         49,284   

Construction & development

     4,783         3,346         8,129   

Consumer

     253         390         643   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 49,920       $ 24,923       $ 74,843   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

25


Table of Contents

The results of operations of HTB and OGB subsequent to the acquisition date are included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The following unaudited pro forma information reflects the Company’s estimated consolidated results of operations as if the acquisitions had occurred on December 31, 2010 and 2009, unadjusted for potential cost savings (in thousands).

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011      2010     2011      2010  

Net interest income and noninterest income

   $ 62,062       $ 29,824      $ 132,519       $ 98,309   

Net income (loss)

   $ 15,649       $ (5,439   $ 8,653       $ (17,743

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders

   $ 14,832       $ (6,246   $ 6,231       $ (20,145

Income (loss) per common share available to common stockholders – basic

   $ 0.63       $ (0.26   $ 0.27       $ (1.03

Income (loss) per common share available to common stockholders – diluted

   $ 0.63       $ (0.26   $ 0.26       $ (1.03

Average number of shares outstanding, basic

     23,438         23,571        23,439         19,569   

Average number of shares outstanding, diluted

     23,559         23,571        23,530         19,569   

In addition to the covered assets acquired in the most recent acquisitions, the Company has other investments in covered assets remaining from its previous FDIC-assisted acquisitions. The following table summarizes components of all covered assets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and their origin:

 

     HTB      OGB      SCB      FBJ      TBC      DBT      AUB      USB      Total  

As of September 30, 2011:

                 (Dollars in thousands)  

Covered loans

   $ 129,269       $ 110,188       $ 58,748       $ 42,499       $ 90,044       $ 313,029       $ 39,217       $ 58,121       $ 841,115   

Less adjustments related to credit risk

     47,738         40,609         6,029         8,239         18,995         112,480         3,594         5,913         243,597   

Less adjustments related to liquidity and yield

     73         190         258         108         371         827         64         199         2,090   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Covered Loans

   $ 81,458       $ 69,389       $ 52,461       $ 34,152       $ 70,678       $ 199,722       $ 35,559       $ 52,009       $ 595,428   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

OREO

   $ 21,953       $ 19,242       $ 10,957       $ 3,037       $ 6,955       $ 35,672       $ 13,415       $ 7,489       $ 118,720   

Less fair value adjustments

     12,618         12,000         500         1,559         1,274         8,774         37         51         36,813   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered OREO

   $ 9,335       $ 7,242       $ 10,457       $ 1,478       $ 5,681       $ 26,898       $ 13,378       $ 7,438       $ 81,907   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total covered assets

   $ 90,793       $ 76,631       $ 62,918       $ 35,630       $ 76,359       $ 226,620       $ 48,937       $ 59,447       $ 677,335   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

FDIC loss-share receivable

   $ 47,604       $ 43,456       $ 5,365       $ 8,863       $ 19,046       $ 104,739       $ 3,215       $ 7,431       $ 239,719   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     SCB      FBJ      TBC      DBT      AUB      USB      Total  

As of December 31, 2010:

   (Dollars in thousands)  

Covered loans

   $ 76,472       $ 48,632       $ 113,283       $ 380,238       $ 53,203       $ 77,188       $ 749,016   

Less adjustments related to credit risk

     12,336         10,532         25,388         130,769         4,332         7,593         190,950   

Less adjustments related to liquidity and yield

     506         151         458         1,199         214         547         3,075   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Covered Loans

   $ 63,630       $ 37,949       $ 87,437       $ 248,270       $ 48,657       $ 69,048       $ 554,991   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

OREO

   $ 8,311       $ 2,799       $ 4,178       $ 42,724       $ 13,207       $ 11,473       $ 82,692   

Less fair value adjustments

     1,373         2,500         2,031         21,000         783         74         27,761   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered OREO

   $ 6,938       $ 299       $ 2,147       $ 21,724       $ 12,424       $ 11,399       $ 54,931   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total covered assets

   $ 70,568       $ 38,248       $ 89,584       $ 269,994       $ 61,081       $ 80,447       $ 609,922   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

FDIC loss-share receivable

   $ 14,333       $ 11,944       $ 27,436       $ 112,404       $ 4,208       $ 6,862       $ 177,187   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

26


Table of Contents

On the dates of acquisition, the Company estimated the future cash flows on each individual loan and made the necessary adjustments to reflect the asset at fair value. At each quarter end subsequent to the acquisition dates, the Company revises the estimates of future cash flows based on current information and makes the necessary adjustments to continue reflecting the assets at fair value. The adjustments to fair value are performed on a loan-by-loan basis and have resulted in the following:

 

Total Amounts

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Adjustments needed where the Company’s initial estimate of cash flows were underestimated: (recorded with a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield)

   $ 15,846       $ 30,448       $ 21,334  

Adjustments needed where the Company’s initial estimate of cash flows were overstated: (recorded through a provision for loan losses)

     8,055         8,410         5,102  

 

Amounts reflected in the Company’s Statement of Operations

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Adjustments needed where the Company’s initial estimate of cash flows were underestimated: (recorded with a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield)

   $   3,169       $   4,245       $   3,563  

Adjustments needed where the Company’s initial estimate of cash flows were overstated: (recorded through a provision for loan losses)

     1,611         1,682         1,020  

A rollforward of acquired loans with deterioration of credit quality for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is shown below:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 

Balance, January 1

   $ 252,535      $ 56,793      $ 56,793   

Change in estimate of cash flows, net of charge-offs or recoveries

     (18,815     (8,081     (3,076

Additions due to acquisitions

     124,136       214,500        25,471   

Other (loan payments, transfers, etc.)

     (36,899     (10,677     (12,740
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 320,957      $ 252,535      $   66,448   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A rollforward of acquired loans without deterioration of credit quality for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is shown below:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 

Balance, January 1

   $ 302,456      $ 80,635      $ 80,635   

Change in estimate of cash flows, net of charge-offs or recoveries

     (16,886     (7,044     (6,647

Additions due to acquisitions

     35,439        248,583        43,250   

Other (loan payments, transfers, etc.)

     (46,538     (19,718     1,602   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 274,471      $ 302,456      $ 118,840   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

27


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of changes in the accretable yields of acquired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 

Balance, January 1

   $ 37,383      $ 3,550      $ 3,550   

Additions due to acquisitions

     24,094        35,245        1,508   

Accretion

     (18,765     (7,502       (3,563

Other activity, net

     (1,606     6,090        4,263   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $   41,106      $   37,383      $ 5,758   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The shared-loss agreements are subject to the servicing procedures as specified in the agreement with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the shared-loss agreements were recorded as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair values of $95.0 million, $168.9 million and $45.8 million on the 2011, 2010 and 2009 acquisition dates, respectively. Changes in the FDIC shared-loss receivable for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are as follows:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 

Balance, January 1

   $ 177,187      $ 45,840      $ 45,840   

Indemnification asset recorded in acquisitions

     94,973        168,918        22,400  

Payments received from FDIC

     (22,107     (26,522     (21,232

Effect of change in expected cash flows on covered assets

     (10,334     (11,049     (4,476
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 239,719      $ 177,187      $ 42,532   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 5 – WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING

Due to the net loss reported for the quarter and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2010, the Company has excluded 23,439 and 28,924, respectively, of potential common shares as these would have been anti-dilutive. Earnings per share have been computed based on the following weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

 

     For the Three  Months
Ended September 30,
     For the Nine  Months
Ended September 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
     (share data in
thousands)
     (share data in
thousands)
 

Basic shares outstanding

     23,438         23,571         23,439         19,569   

Plus: Dilutive effect of ISOs

     24         —           31         —     

Plus: Dilutive effect of Restricted Grants

     97         —           60         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted shares outstanding

     23,559         23,571         23,530         19,569   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

NOTE 6 – OTHER BORROWINGS

The Company has, from time to time, utilized certain borrowing arrangements with various financial institutions to fund growth in earning assets or provide additional liquidity when appropriate spreads can be realized. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were $21.0 million and $43.5 million, respectively, outstanding borrowings with the Company’s correspondent banks. There were no outstanding borrowings with the Company’s correspondent banks at September 30, 2010. The Company’s success with attracting and retaining retail deposits has allowed for very low dependence on more volatile non-deposit funding.

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

28


Table of Contents

The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as are used for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The Company issues standby letters of credit, which are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements and expire in decreasing amounts with varying terms. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company holds various assets as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.

The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, residential real estate and income-producing commercial properties.

The Company’s commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are presented in the following table:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 

Commitments to extend credit

   $ 130,646       $ 166,845       $ 132,675   

Standby letters of credit

   $ 6,889       $ 7,874       $ 7,223   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Certain of the statements made in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of, and subject to the protections of, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions and future performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which may be beyond our control and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan,” “point to,” “project,” “predict,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “potential” and other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, legislative and regulatory initiatives; additional competition in Ameris’ markets; potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or internal restructuring, that may be pursued by Ameris; state and federal banking regulations; changes in or application of environmental and other laws and regulations to which Ameris is subject; political, legal and economic conditions and developments; financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts; changes in commodity prices and interest rates; weather, natural disasters and other catastrophic events; and other factors discussed in Ameris’ filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act.

All written or oral forward-looking statements that are made by or are attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. Our forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this report or the respective date of the document from which they are incorporated herein by reference. We have no obligation and do not undertake to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report, or after the respective dates on which such statements otherwise are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The following table sets forth unaudited selected financial data for the previous five quarters. This data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the information contained in this Item 2.

 

29


Table of Contents
(in thousands, except share data, taxable equivalent)   Third
Quarter 2011
    Second
Quarter 2011
    First
Quarter 2011
    Fourth
Quarter 2010
    Third
Quarter 2010
    For Nine Months Ended  
            September 30,
2011
    September 30,
2010
 

Results of Operations:

             

Net interest income

  $ 27,802      $ 28,747      $ 24,207      $ 23,006      $ 22,000      $ 80,756      $ 66,271   

Net interest income (tax equivalent)

    28,026        28,969        24,418        23,245        22,220        81,413        67,452   

Provision for loan losses

    7,552        9,115        7,043        11,404        9,739        23,710        39,117   

Non-interest income

    33,722        5,974        6,193        12,303        5,010        45,889        22,974   

Non-interest expense

    29,263        22,596        21,155        21,946        18,928        73,014        59,273   

Income tax expense (benefit)

    8,249        896        824        98        (760     9,969        (3,293

Preferred stock dividends

    817        807        798        811        807        2,422        2,402   

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

    15,643        1,307        580        1,050        (1,704     17,530        (8,254

Selected Average Balances:

             

Loans, net of unearned income

  $ 1,437,609      $ 1,349,092      $ 1,361,964      $ 1,416,254      $ 1,503,149      $ 1,373,152      $ 1,526,487   

Covered loans

    540,959        506,251        540,127        374,282        187,556        540,730        159,428   

Investment securities

    327,195        289,149        301,572        284,066        235,057        304,808        242,044   

Earning assets

    2,503,121        2,426,041        2,453,040        2,378,065        2,184,676        2,474,707        2,180,760   

Assets

    3,048,337        2,909,012        2,949,943        2,872,207        2,429,709        2,944,875        2,417,160   

Deposits

    2,639,848        2,540,738        2,548,509        2,310,372        2,088,997        2,598,025        2,100,796   

Common shareholders’ equity

    228,716        229,794        222,675        225,088        224,656        226,568        244,950   

Period-End Balances:

             

Loans, net of unearned income

  $ 1,368,895      $ 1,360,063      $ 1,345,981      $ 1,374,757      $ 1,455,853      $ 1,368,895      $ 1,455,853   

Covered loans

    595,428        486,489        526,012        554,991        192,268        595,428        192,268   

Earning assets

    2,475,511        2,399,258        2,442,121        2,513,591        2,199,928        2,475,511        2,199,928   

Total assets

    3,010,379        2,857,237        2,918,423        2,972,168        2,434,703        3,010,379        2,434,703   

Total deposits

    2,628,892        2,511,363        2,572,689        2,535,426        2,099,002        2,628,892        2,099,002   

Common shareholders’ equity

    243,850        226,739        223,588        223,286        223,993        243,850        273,968   

Per Common Share Data:

             

Earnings per share - Basic

  $ 0.67      $ 0.06      $ 0.02      $ 0.04      $ (0.07   $ 0.75      $ (0.42

Earnings per share - Diluted

    0.66        0.06        0.02        0.04        (0.07     0.74        (0.42

Common book value per share

    10.27        9.54        9.41        9.44        9.48        10.27        9.48   

End of period shares outstanding

    23,742,794        23,766,044        23,766,044        23,647,841        23,625,065        23,742,794        23,625,065   

Weighted average shares outstanding

             

Basic

    23,438,335        23,449,123        23,440,201        23,427,393        23,570,929        23,438,763        19,569,478   

Diluted

    23,559,063        23,508,419        23,474,424        23,579,205        23,570,929        23,530,278        19,569,478   

Market Price:

             

High closing price

    10.30        10.16        11.10        11.07        10.49        11.10        11.55   

Low closing price

    8.47        8.49        9.32        8.73        7.83        8.47        7.36   

Closing price for quarter

    8.71        8.87        10.16        10.54        9.35        8.71        9.35   

Average daily trading volume

    71,955        58,706        46,618        55,281        75,573        59,275        106,881   

Cash dividends per share

    —          —          —          —          —          —          —     

Stock dividend

    —          —          —          —          —          —          3 for 157   

Closing price to book value

    0.85        0.93        1.09        1.12        0.99        0.85        0.99   

Performance Ratios:

             

Return on average assets

    2.04     0.18     0.08     0.15     (0.28 %)      0.79     (0.45 %) 

Return on average common equity

    27.13     2.28     1.06     1.85     (2.46 %)      10.36     (4.02 %) 

Average loans to average deposits

    74.95     73.02     74.64     77.50     80.93     73.67     80.25

Average equity to average assets

    9.16     9.63     9.25     9.58     11.25     9.39     11.25

Net interest margin (tax equivalent)

    4.44     4.79     4.04     3.88     4.04     4.40     4.04

Efficiency ratio (tax equivalent)

    47.56     65.08     69.59     62.15     70.08     57.65     66.40

 

30


Table of Contents

Overview

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors which have affected the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as reflected in the unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010 and operating results for the three-and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. These comments should be read in conjunction with the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere herein.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

Consolidated Earnings and Profitability

Ameris reported net income available to common shareholders of $15.6 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to a net loss for the same quarter in 2010 of $1.7 million, or $0.07 per diluted share. The Company’s return on average assets and average shareholders’ equity increased in the third quarter of 2011 to 2.04% and 27.13%, respectively, compared to (0.28%) and (2.46%) in the third quarter of 2010. The Company’s results for the third quarter of 2011 include several amounts that are considered non-recurring. Gains on the FDIC-assisted acquisitions of OGB and HTB totaled approximately $26.9 million. Partially offsetting this amount was non-recurring acquisition expenses that are not included in the bargain purchase calculation but relate to these acquisitions. Severance expenses, conversion expenses and other miscellaneous expenses associated with these two banks totaled $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2011. Additionally, the Company accelerated efforts to move problem assets through retail channels during the third quarter of 2011 with sales of approximately $25.3 million of non-performing or classified assets. This “bulk-sale” type activity generated losses or related expenses totaling $5.8 million for the third quarter of 2011. Excluding these non-recurring income and expense amounts, the Company would have reported net income of $2.4 million, or $0.09 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2011.

Net Interest Income and Margins

On a tax equivalent basis, net interest income for the third quarter of 2011 was $28.0 million, an increase of $5.8 million compared to $22.2 reported in the same quarter in 2010. The Company’s net interest margin has been positively affected by improvements in the expected cash flows from recent FDIC acquisitions and by steady decreases in the Company’s cost of funds. The Company’s net interest margin was 4.44% for the third quarter of 2011, compared to 4.04% in the third quarter of 2010. Increases in earning assets over the past year have been in covered loans with favorable yields compared to the Company’s low cost of funds.

During the third quarter of 2011, interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, totaled $35.0 million, compared to $29.4 million in the same quarter of 2010. Yields on earning assets increased to 5.55% in the third quarter of 2011 compared to 5.34% reported in the third quarter of 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, short-term assets averaged 7.4% of total earning assets, compared to 11.5% in the same quarter in 2010, as the Company replaced short-term assets with loans backed by shared-loss agreements with the FDIC. Current opportunities to invest a portion of the short-term assets in the bond market have been limited by the Company’s inability to maintain certain portfolio characteristics with current yields and structures being offered. Efforts to increase lending activities have been slow to generate increases in outstanding loans due to the current economic conditions in the Company’s markets.

Total funding costs declined to 1.02% in the third quarter of 2011 compared to 1.33% during the third quarter of 2010. Deposit costs decreased from 1.31% in the third quarter of 2010 and 1.08% in the second quarter of 2011 to 0.97% in the third quarter of 2011. Ongoing efforts to maintain the percentage of funding from transaction deposits have succeeded such that non-CD deposits averaged 60.5% of total deposits in the third quarter of 2011, compared to 58.3% during the third quarter of 2010. Lower costs on deposits were due mostly to the lower rate environment and the Company’s ability to offer lower priced CDs due to its larger than normal position in short-term assets. Further opportunity to realize savings on deposits exists but may be limited due to current costs. Average balances of interest bearing deposits and their respective costs for the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 are shown below:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)    September 30, 2011     September 30, 2010  
     Average
Balance
     Average
Cost
    Average
Balance
     Average
Cost
 

NOW

   $ 593,801         0.66   $ 478,105         0.90

MMDA

     583,552         1.00     448,955         1.31

Savings

     82,210         0.44     64,575         0.47

Retail CDs < $100,000

     448,597         1.24     367,353         1.72

Retail CDs > $100,000

     511,205         1.44     375,756         1.80

Brokered CDs

     82,880         3.29     128,346         3.11
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest bearing deposits

   $ 2,302,245         1.11   $ 1,863,090         1.47

 

31


Table of Contents

Provision for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

The Company’s provision for loan losses during the third quarter of 2011 amounted to $7.6 million, compared to $9.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 and $9.7 million in the third quarter of 2010. Although the Company has experienced improving trends in criticized and classified assets for several quarters, higher levels of provision for loan losses have been required to account for continued devaluation of real estate collateral. At September 30, 2011, classified loans still accruing totaled $33.3 million, compared to $30.7 million at September 30, 2010. Non-accrual loans at September 30, 2011 totaled $59.0 million, a 2.4% decrease from the $60.5 million reported at June 30, 2011 and a 34.3% decrease from the $89.9 million reported at September 30, 2010.

At September 30, 2011, other real estate owned (excluding covered OREO) totaled $54.5 million, compared to $61.5 million at June 30, 2011 and $50.9 million at September 30, 2010. Management regularly assesses the valuation of OREO through periodic reappraisal and through inquiries received in the marketing process. The Company has found that with a marketing window of 3-6 months, the liquidation of properties varies from 85% to 100% of current book value. Certain properties, mostly raw land and subdivision lots, have extended marketing periods because of excessive inventory and record low home building activity. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, total non-performing assets decreased to 3.77% of total assets compared to 4.27% at June 30, 2011 and 5.78% at September 30, 2010. Management continues to aggressively identify and resolve problem assets while seeking quality credits to grow the loan portfolio.

Net charge-offs on loans during the third quarter of 2011 were $6.8 million, or 1.98% of loans on an annualized basis, compared to $9.1 million, or 2.14% of loans, in the third quarter of 2010. The Company’s allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2011 was $35.2 million, or 2.57% of total loans, compared to $34.1 million, or 2.34% of total loans, at September 30, 2010.

Non-interest Income

Total non-interest income for the third quarter of 2011 was $33.7 million, compared to $5.0 million in the third quarter of 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company reported a gain of $26.9 million on FDIC-assisted transactions. Excluding this gain, total non-interest income increased by $1.8 million, or 36.8%, in the third quarter of 2011, when compared to the same period in 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts in the third quarter of 2011 were $4.7 million, compared to $3.8 million in the third quarter of 2010. Increases in service charges related to the acquired deposits in FDIC-assisted transactions, along with increased retention of fees related to insufficient funds, were the primary reasons for the increase over prior period levels.

Non-interest Expense

Total non-interest expenses for the third quarter of 2011 increased to $29.3 million compared to $18.9 million in the same quarter in 2010. Credit related expenses, including problem loan and OREO expense and OREO write-downs and losses, increased to $9.0 million in the third quarter of 2011 compared to $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2010. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company increased sales activity in retail channels to move problem assets (non-performing assets and classified assets). The additional effort in the third quarter of 2011 was driven by lower sales prices, causing the Company to realize losses on the sale of OREO of $5.9 million, compared to OREO losses of $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2010. Salaries and benefits increased $2.5 million when compared to the third quarter of 2010; however, this increase is in proportion to the Company’s asset growth. Occupancy and equipment expenses for the third quarter of 2011 amounted to $3.2 million, representing an increase of $1.0 million from the same quarter in 2010. Data processing and telecommunications expenses increased $1.1 million to $2.8 million for the third quarter of 2011 from $1.7 million for the same period in 2010. Both of these increases are directly correlated to the increase in the number of branch locations from the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2011.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is influenced by the amount of taxable income, the amount of tax-exempt income and the amount of non-deductible expenses. For the third quarter of 2011, the Company reported an income tax expense of $8.2 million. This compares to an income tax benefit of $760,000 in the same period of 2010. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ending September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 33.4% and 45.9%, respectively.

 

32


Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Interest Income

Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $103.5 million on a tax equivalent basis, an increase of $14.1 million when compared to $89.4 million for the same period in 2010. Average earning assets for the nine-month period increased $293.9 million to $2.47 billion as of September 30, 2011 compared to $2.18 billion as of September 30, 2010. Yield on average earning assets improved slightly to 5.59% in the first nine months of 2011 compared to 5.48% in the first nine months of 2010. Earning assets acquired in connection with the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions have generally allowed the Company to maintain level amounts of earning assets while interest rate floors on individual customer loans have allowed the Company to keep the yield on loans from falling precipitously in the current rate environment. Additionally, yields on the acquired assets have been much stronger than the Company’s other earning assets, helping boost the Company’s overall yield on earning assets.

Interest Expense

Total interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 amounted to $22.1 million, reflecting a slight increase of $103,000 from the same period of 2010. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s funding costs declined to 1.10% from 1.36% reported in the previous year. The majority of the decline in interest expense and costs relates to improvements in the cost of the Company’s retail time deposits which fell to 1.51% in the nine-month period ending September 30, 2011 compared to 1.83% in the same period in 2010. In addition to lower costs on deposits, the Company’s mix of deposits has improved over the past year. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the Company had $1.64 billion in non-CD deposits compared to $1.25 billion at the same time in 2010. Non-interest bearing deposits increased 50.4% from $235.6 million and 11.2% of total deposits at September 30, 2010 to $354.4 million and 13.5% of total deposits at September 30, 2011.

Net Interest Income

Higher levels of earning assets with generally level yields have combined with reduced funding costs to result in material improvements in net interest income. For the year-to-date period ending September 30, 2011, the Company reported $81.44 million of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis, compared to $67.5 million of net interest income for the same period in 2010. The Company’s net interest margin increased to 4.40% in the nine month period ending September 30, 2011 compared to 4.14% in the same period in 2010.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses decreased to $23.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $39.1 million in the same period in 2010. Non-performing assets totaled $113.6 million at September 30, 2011, compared to $140.8 million at September 30, 2010. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, Ameris had net charge-offs totaling $21.4 million, compared to $39.8 million for the same period in 2010. Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of loans improved from 3.65% during the first nine month of 2010 to 2.09% during the first nine months of 2011.

Non-interest Income

Non-interest income for the first nine months of 2011 was $45.9 million, compared to $23.0 million in the same period in 2010. Excluding non-recurring gains on investment securities and FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the Company’s non-interest income totaled $18.8 million, an increase of 29.0% compared to the same period in 2010. Service charges on deposit accounts increased approximately $2.8 million to $13.6 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increases in service charges are related to higher numbers of deposit accounts subject to fees and charges as well as incremental revenue from the deposit accounts acquired in the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions. Income from mortgage banking activity declined from $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $1.5 million in the first nine months of 2011 due to the reduction in re-finance activity. The accretion of the discount of the FDIC indemnification asset also attributed to the increase of non-interest income during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Non-interest Expense

Total operating expenses for the first nine months of 2011 increased to $73.0 million compared to $59.3 million in the same period in 2010. Salaries and benefits increased $5.9 million when compared to the first nine months of 2010; however, this increase is in proportion to the Company’s asset growth. Occupancy and equipment expenses for the first nine months of 2011 amounted to $8.7 million, representing an increase of $2.4 million from the same period in 2010. Data processing and telecommunications expenses increased $2.1 million to $7.7 million for the first nine months of 2011 from $5.6 million for the same period in 2010. Both of these increases are directly correlated to the increase in the number of branch locations from September 30, 2010 to September 30, 2011. Credit related expenses, including problem loan and OREO expense and OREO write-downs and losses, increased to $14.7 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to $11.5 million in the first nine months of 2010 for the same reasons as discussed in the quarter to date results above.

 

33


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

In the first nine months of 2011, the Company recorded an income tax expense totaling approximately $10.0 million, representing an effective tax rate of 33.3%. This compares to a benefit of $3.3 million in the first nine months of 2010 representing an effective rate of 36.0%.

Financial Condition as of September 30, 2011

Securities

Debt securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of the related deferred tax effect. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are classified as other investments and are recorded at cost.

The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized in interest income using methods approximating the interest method over the life of the securities. Realized gains and losses, determined on the basis of the cost of specific securities sold, are included in earnings on the settlement date. Declines in the fair value of securities below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses.

In determining whether other-than-temporary impairment losses exist, management considers: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Substantially all of the unrealized losses on debt securities are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the issuer or underlying collateral. All unrealized losses are considered temporary because each security carries an acceptable investment grade and the Company does not intend to sell these investment securities at an unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery or maturity. Therefore, at September 30, 2011, these investments are not considered impaired on an other-than temporary basis.

The following table illustrates certain information regarding the Company’s investment portfolio with respect to yields, sensitivities and expected cash flows over the next twelve months assuming constant prepayments and maturities:

 

     Book Value      Fair Value      Yield     Modified
Duration
     Estimated Cash
Flows
12 months
 
     Dollars in Thousands  

September 30, 2011:

             

U.S. government agencies

   $ 20,007       $ 20,309         1.49     1.30       $ 14,300   

State and municipal securities

     68,486         71,682         3.70     5.84         5,579   

Corporate debt securities

     11,638         11,528         6.79     6.52         100   

Mortgage-backed securities

     230,786         237,320         3.33     2.90         66,521   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt securities

   $ 330,917       $ 340,839         3.42     3.57       $ 86,500   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

September 30, 2010:

             

U.S. government agencies

   $ 15,358       $ 16,281         4.15     3.07       $ 7,250   

State and municipal securities

     46,600         48,772         4.96     5.75         2,487   

Corporate debt securities

     12,522         9,853         6.69     7.15         —     

Mortgage-backed securities

     153,545         160,921         4.54     2.34         43,637   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt securities

   $ 228,025       $ 235,827         4.72     3.35       $ 53,374   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

At September 30, 2011, gross loans outstanding (including covered loans) were $1.96 billion, an increase from $1.65 billion reported at September 30, 2010. When compared to December 31, 2010, gross loans increased approximately $34.6 million, or 1.8%. The Company’s participation in FDIC-assisted acquisitions was integral to being able to maintain a certain level of loans because management does not believe that enough loan opportunities with acceptable quality and profitability existed in our current market areas to cause loan footings to stabilize and increase. Decreases in legacy loans over the past year reflect this trend, with legacy loans declining 6.0% from $1.46 billion at September 30, 2010 to $1.37 billion at September 30, 2011.

 

34


Table of Contents

The decline in loans also reflects management’s focus on reducing higher risk loans within the Bank’s loan portfolio, as well as the slower economic environment that persisted throughout 2009 and 2010. The Company regularly monitors the composition of the loan portfolio to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in light of the impact that changes in the economic environment may have on the loan portfolio.

The Company focuses on the following loan categories: (1) commercial, financial and agricultural; (2) residential real estate; (3) commercial and farmland real estate; (4) construction and development related real estate; and (5) consumer. The Company’s management has strategically located its branches in select markets in south and southeast Georgia, north Florida, southeast Alabama and throughout South Carolina to take advantage of the growth in these areas.

The Company’s risk management processes include a loan review program designed to evaluate the credit risk in the loan portfolio and ensure credit grade accuracy. Through the loan review process, the Company conducts: (1) a loan portfolio summary analysis; (2) charge-off and recovery analysis; (3) trends in accruing problem loan analysis; and (4) problem and past due loan analysis. This analysis process serves as a tool to assist management in assessing the overall quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as “substandard” are loans which are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. These assets exhibit a well-defined weakness or are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These weaknesses may be characterized by past due performance, operating losses and/or questionable collateral values. Loans classified as “doubtful” are those loans that have characteristics similar to substandard loans but have an increased risk of loss. Loans classified as “loss” are those loans which are considered uncollectible and are in the process of being charged-off.

The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is based on management’s evaluation of the size and composition of the loan portfolio, the level of non-performing and past due loans, historical trends of charged-off loans and recoveries, prevailing economic conditions and other factors management deems appropriate. The Company’s management has established an allowance for loan losses which it believes is adequate for the risk of loss inherent in the loan portfolio. Based on a credit evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a monthly review of the allowance for loan losses to the Company’s Board of Directors. The review that management has developed primarily focuses on risk by evaluating individual loans in certain risk categories. These categories have also been established by management and take the form of loan grades. By grading the loan portfolio in this manner the Company’s management is able to effectively evaluate the portfolio by risk, which management believes is the most effective way to analyze the loan portfolio and thus analyze the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses is established by examining: (1) the large classified loans, nonaccrual loans and loans considered impaired and evaluating them individually to determine the specific reserve allocation; and (2) the remainder of the loan portfolio to allocate a portion of the allowance based on past loss experience and the economic conditions for the particular loan category. The Company also considers other factors such as changes in lending policies and procedures; changes in national, regional, and/or local economic and business conditions; changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; changes in the experience, ability and depth of either the bank president or lending staff; changes in the volume and severity of past due and classified loans; changes in the quality of the Company’s corporate loan review system; and other factors management deems appropriate.

For the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded net charge-offs totaling $21.4 million, compared to $39.8 million for the period ended September 30, 2010. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 decreased to $23.7 million compared to $39.1 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010. At the end of the third quarter of 2011, the allowance for loan losses totaled $35.2 million, or 2.57% of total legacy loans, compared to $34.6 million, or 2.52% of total legacy loans, at December 31, 2010 and $34.1 million, or 2.34% of total legacy loans, at September 30, 2010.

 

35


Table of Contents

The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
    September 30,
2010
 

Balance of allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

   $ 34,576      $ 35,762   

Provision charged to operating expense

     22,098        38,097   

Charge-offs:

    

Commercial, financial and agricultural

     3,855        3,577   

Real estate – residential

     3,641        8,763   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     7,851        13,734   

Real estate – construction and development

     6,859        15,335   

Consumer installment

     508        701   

Other

     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total charge-offs

     22,714        42,110   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Recoveries:

    

Commercial, financial and agricultural

     153        549   

Real estate – residential

     107        166   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     43        658   

Real estate – construction and development

     873        662   

Consumer installment

     102        288   

Other

     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total recoveries

     1,278        2,323   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

     21,436        39,787   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance of allowance for loan losses at end of period

   $ 35,238      $ 34,072   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net annualized charge-offs as a percentage of average loans

     2.09     3.16

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at end of period

     2.57     2.34

Assets Covered by Loss-Sharing Agreements with the FDIC

Loans that were acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions that are covered by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC (“covered loans”) totaled $595.4 million, $555.0 million and $185.3 million at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. OREO that is covered by the loss-sharing agreements with the FDIC totaled $81.9 million, $54.9 million and $28.4 million at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The loss-sharing agreements are subject to the servicing procedures as specified in the agreements with the FDIC. The expected reimbursements under the loss-sharing agreements were recorded as an indemnification asset at their estimated fair value of $95.0 million, $168.9 million and $45.8 million on the 2011, 2010 and 2009 acquisition dates, respectively. The FDIC loss-share receivable reported at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 was $239.7 million, $177.2 million and $42.5 million, respectively.

The Company recorded the loans at their fair values, taking into consideration certain credit quality, risk and liquidity marks. The Company is confident in its estimation of credit risk and its adjustments to the carrying balances of the acquired loans. If the Company determines that a loan or group of loans has deteriorated from its initial assessment of fair value, a reserve for loan losses will be established to account for that difference. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded provision for loan loss expense of $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, to account for losses where the initial estimate of cash flows was found to be excessive on loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions. If the Company determines that a loan or group of loans has improved from its initial assessment of fair value, the increase in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date is recognized as interest income prospectively.

 

36


Table of Contents

Covered loans are shown below according to loan type as of the end of the periods shown:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,      December 31,      September 30,  
   2011      2010      2010  

Commercial, financial and agricultural

   $ 49,859       $ 47,309       $ 16,506   

Real estate – construction and development

     82,933         89,781         43,047   

Real estate – commercial and farmland

     323,760         257,428         90,158   

Real estate – residential

     135,318         149,226         27,736   

Consumer installment

     3,558         11,247         7,841   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 595,428       $ 554,991       $ 185,288   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include nonaccrual loans, accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or more, repossessed personal property and other real estate owned. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when management has concerns relating to the ability to collect the principal and interest and generally when such loans are 90 days or more past due. Management performs a detailed review and valuation assessment of impaired loans on a quarterly basis and recognizes losses when impairment is identified. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the loan contract. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, any interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current income.

As of September 30, 2011, nonaccrual or impaired loans totaled $59.1 million, a decrease of approximately $20.2 million since December 31, 2010. The decrease in nonaccrual loans is due to success in the foreclosure and resolution process as well as a significant slowdown in the formation of new problem credits. Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets were 3.77%, 4.62% and 5.78% at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively.

Non-performing assets at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010 were as follows:

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

   September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
     September 30,
2010
 

Total nonaccrual loans

   $ 59,067       $ 79,289       $ 89,682   

Other real estate owned and repossessed collateral

     54,487         57,915         48,430   

Accruing loans delinquent 90 days or more

     20         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets

   $ 113,574       $ 137,204       $ 138,112   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Commercial Lending Practices

On December 12, 2006, the Federal Bank Regulatory Agencies released guidance on Concentration in Commercial Real Estate Lending. This guidance defines commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans as loans secured by raw land, land development and construction (including 1-4 family residential construction), multi-family property and non-farm nonresidential property where the primary or a significant source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property, excluding owner occupied properties (loans for which 50% or more of the source of repayment is derived from the ongoing operations and activities conducted by the party, or affiliate of the party, who owns the property) or the proceeds of the sale, refinancing or permanent financing of the property. Loans for owner occupied CRE are generally excluded from the CRE guidance.

The CRE guidance is applicable when either:

 

  (1) total loans for construction, land development, and other land, net of owner occupied loans, represent 100% or more of a bank’s total risk-based capital; or

 

  (2) total loans secured by multifamily and nonfarm nonresidential properties and loans for construction, land development, and other land, net of owner occupied loans, represent 300% or more of a bank’s total risk-based capital.

Banks that are subject to the CRE guidance’s criteria are required to implement enhanced strategic planning, CRE underwriting policies, risk management and internal controls, portfolio stress testing, risk exposure limits, and other policies, including management compensation and incentives, to address the CRE risks. Higher allowances for loan losses and capital levels may also be appropriate.

 

37


Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2011, the Company exhibited a concentration in CRE loan category based on Federal Reserve Call codes. The primary risks of CRE lending are:

 

  (1) within CRE loans, construction and development loans are somewhat dependent upon continued strength in demand for residential real estate, which is reliant on favorable real estate mortgage rates and changing population demographics;

 

  (2) on average, CRE loan sizes are generally larger than non-CRE loan types; and

 

  (3) certain construction and development loans may be less predictable and more difficult to evaluate and monitor.

The following table outlines CRE loan categories and CRE loans as a percentage of total loans as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The loan categories and concentrations below are based on Federal Reserve Call codes and include covered loans.

 

(Dollars in Thousands)    September 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
     Balance      % of  Total
Loans
    Balance      % of  Total
Loans
 

Construction and development loans

   $ 228,703         12   $ 250,211         13

Multi-family loans

     58,627         3     55,121         3

Nonfarm non-residential loans

     810,343         41     760,598         39
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total CRE Loans

   $ 1,097,673         56   $ 1,065,930         55

All other loan types

     866,650         44     863,818         45
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Loans

   $ 1,964,323         100   $ 1,929,748         100
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table outlines the percent of total CRE loans, net owner occupied loans to total risk-based capital, and the Company’s internal concentration limits as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

     Internal
Limit
  September 30,
2011
  December 31,
2010
       Actual   Actual

Construction and development, including covered loans

   100%     67%     79%

Commercial real estate, including covered loans

   300%   256%   257%
      

Construction and development, excluding covered loans

   100%     43%     51%

Commercial real estate, excluding covered loans

   300%   165%   215%

Short-Term Investments

The Company’s short-term investments are comprised of federal funds sold and interest bearing balances. At September 30, 2011, the Company’s short-term investments were $170.3 million, compared to $261.3 million and $306.9 million at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The recent FDIC-assisted acquisitions allowed the Company to replace short term assets with loans backed by shared-loss agreements with the FDIC.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company had cash flow hedges with notional amounts totaling $35.0 million at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, for the purpose of converting floating rate loans to fixed rate. The Company had a cash flow hedge with notional amount of $37.1 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 for the purpose of converting the variable rate on the junior subordinated debentures to fixed rate. The fair value of these instruments amounted to approximately ($31,000), $3.0 million and $1.3 million as of September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively, and was recorded as an asset. No hedge ineffectiveness from cash flow hedges was recognized in the statement of operations. All components of each derivative’s gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

 

38


Table of Contents

Capital

Capital management consists of providing equity to support both current and anticipated future operations. The Company is subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”) and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the “GDBF”), and the Bank is subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the FDIC and the GDBF.

The FRB, the FDIC and the GDBF have adopted risk-based capital requirements for assessing bank holding company and bank capital adequacy. These standards define and establish minimum capital requirements in relation to assets and off-balance sheet exposure, adjusted for credit risk. The risk-based capital standards currently in effect are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among bank holding companies and banks and to account for off-balance sheet exposure. The regulatory capital standards are defined by the following three key measurements:

 

  a) The “Leverage Ratio” is defined as Tier 1 capital to average assets. To be considered “adequately capitalized” under this measurement, a bank must maintain a leverage ratio greater than or equal to 4.00%. For a bank to be considered “well capitalized” a bank must maintain a leverage ratio greater than or equal to 5.00%.

 

  b) The “Core Capital Ratio” is defined as Tier 1 capital to total risk weighted assets. To be considered “adequately capitalized” under this measurement, a bank must maintain a core capital ratio greater than or equal to 4.00%. For a bank to be considered “well capitalized” a bank must maintain a core capital ratio greater than or equal to 6.00%.

 

  c) The “Total Capital Ratio” is defined as total capital to total risk weighted assets. To be considered “adequately capitalized” under this measurement, a bank must maintain a total capital ratio greater than or equal to 8.00%. For a bank to be considered “well capitalized” a bank must maintain a total capital ratio greater than or equal to 10.00%.

As of September 30, 2011, under the regulatory capital standards, the Bank was considered “well capitalized” under all capital measurements. The following table sets forth the regulatory capital ratios of Ameris at September 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2010.

 

     September 30,     December 31,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2010  

Leverage Ratio (tier 1 capital to average assets)

      

Consolidated

     10.59     11.34     12.42

Ameris Bank

     10.46        11.05        12.01   

Core Capital Ratio (tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets)

      

Consolidated

     19.16     18.19        18.55   

Ameris Bank

     18.99        17.62        17.75   

Total Capital Ratio (total capital to risk weighted assets)

      

Consolidated

     20.42     19.45        19.81   

Ameris Bank

     20.25        18.88        19.01   

Capital Purchase Program

On November 21, 2008, the Company, elected to participate in the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) established under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”). Accordingly, on such date, the Company issued and sold to the United States Treasury (“Treasury”), for an aggregate cash purchase price of $52 million, (i) 52,000 shares (the “Preferred Shares”) of the Company’s fixed rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and (ii) a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 679,443 shares of the Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.48 per share. The issuance and sale of these securities was a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

Cumulative dividends on the Preferred Shares will accrue on the liquidation preference at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter, but such dividends will be paid only if, as and when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Preferred Shares have no maturity date and rank senior to the Common Stock (and pari passu with the Company’s other authorized preferred stock, of which no shares are currently designated or outstanding) with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Company. Subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Preferred Shares are redeemable at the option of the Company at 100% of their liquidation preference.

The Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Preferred Shares and the Warrant were sold contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the Common Stock (including with respect to the payment of cash dividends in excess of $0.05 per share, which was the amount of the last regular dividend declared by the Company prior to October 14, 2008) and on the Company’s ability to repurchase its Common Stock, and subjects the Company to certain of the executive compensation limitations included in the EESA.

 

39


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity

The Company’s primary market risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk, and to a lesser degree, liquidity risk. The Bank operates under an Asset Liability Management Policy approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and the ALCO Committee. The policy outlines limits on interest rate risk in terms of changes in net interest income and changes in the net market values of assets and liabilities over certain changes in interest rate environments. These measurements are made through a simulation model which projects the impact of changes in interest rates on the Bank’s assets and liabilities. The policy also outlines responsibility for monitoring interest rate risk, and the process for the approval, implementation and monitoring of interest rate risk strategies to achieve the Bank’s interest rate risk objectives.

The ALCO Committee is comprised of senior officers of Ameris and two outside members of the Company’s Board of Directors. The ALCO Committee makes all strategic decisions with respect to the sources and uses of funds that may affect net interest income, including net interest spread and net interest margin. The objective of the ALCO Committee is to identify the interest rate, liquidity and market value risks of the Company’s balance sheet and use reasonable methods approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and executive management to minimize those identified risks.

The normal course of business activity exposes the Company to interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is managed within an overall asset and liability framework for the Company. The principal objectives of asset and liability management are to predict the sensitivity of net interest spreads to potential changes in interest rates, control risk and enhance profitability. Funding positions are kept within predetermined limits designed to properly manage risk and liquidity. The Company employs sensitivity analysis in the form of a net interest income simulation to help characterize the market risk arising from changes in interest rates. In addition, fluctuations in interest rates usually result in changes in the fair market value of the Company’s financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. The Company’s interest rate risk position is managed by the ALCO Committee.

The Company uses a simulation modeling process to measure interest rate risk and evaluate potential strategies. Interest rate scenario models are prepared using software created and licensed from an outside vendor. The Company’s simulation includes all financial assets and liabilities. Simulation results quantify interest rate risk under various interest rate scenarios. Management then develops and implements appropriate strategies. The ALCO Committee has determined that an acceptable level of interest rate risk would be for net interest income to decrease no more than 5.00% given a change in selected interest rates of 200 basis points over any 24-month period.

Liquidity management involves the matching of the cash flow requirements of customers, who may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs, and the ability of Ameris to manage those requirements. The Company strives to maintain an adequate liquidity position by managing the balances and maturities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities so that the balance it has in short-term investments at any given time will adequately cover any reasonably anticipated immediate need for funds. Additionally, the Bank maintains relationships with correspondent banks, which could provide funds on short notice, if needed. The Company has invested in FHLB stock for the purpose of establishing credit lines with the FHLB. The credit availability to the Bank is equal to 20% of the Bank’s total assets as reported on the most recent quarterly financial information submitted to the regulators subject to the pledging of sufficient collateral. At September 30, 2011, there were $21.0 million of advances outstanding on the Company’s lines of credit with the FHLB.

The following liquidity ratios compare certain assets and liabilities to total deposits or total assets:

 

    September 30,
2011
    June 30,
2011
    March 31,
2011
    December 31,
2010
    September 30,
2010
 

Investment securities available for sale to total deposits

    12.97     13.31     11.76     12.72     11.25

Loans (net of unearned income) to total deposits (1)

    52.07     54.16     52.32     54.22     69.36

Interest-earning assets to total assets

    82.23     83.97     83.63     84.57     89.99

Interest-bearing deposits to total deposits

    86.52     87.34     87.71     88.09     88.77

 

(1) Loans exclude covered assets where appropriate

The liquidity resources of the Company are monitored continuously by the ALCO Committee and on a periodic basis by state and federal regulatory authorities. As determined under guidelines established by these regulatory authorities, the Company’s and the Bank’s liquidity ratios at September 30, 2011 were considered satisfactory. The Company is aware of no events or trends likely to result in a material change in liquidity.

 

40


Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The Company is exposed only to U.S. dollar interest rate changes, and, accordingly, the Company manages exposure by considering the possible changes in the net interest margin. The Company does not have any trading instruments nor does it classify any portion of the investment portfolio as held for trading. The Company’s hedging activities are limited to cash flow hedges and are part of the Company’s program to manage interest rate sensitivity. At September 30, 2011, the Company had one effective LIBOR rate swap with a notional amount of $37.1 million. The LIBOR rate swap exchanges fixed rate payments of 4.15% for floating rate payments based on the three month LIBOR and matures December 2018. Finally, the Company has no exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and other market risks.

Interest rates play a major part in the net interest income of a financial institution. The sensitivity to rate changes is known as “interest rate risk”. The repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities can influence the changes in net interest income. As part of the Company’s asset/liability management program, the timing of repriced assets and liabilities is referred to as “Gap management”.

The Company uses simulation analysis to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market interest rates. The simulation of rising, declining and flat interest rate scenarios allows management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the impact of market interest rate swings. The analysis of the impact on net interest income over a twelve-month period is subjected to a gradual 200 basis point increase or decrease in market rates on net interest income and is monitored on a quarterly basis.

Additional information required by Item 305 of Regulation S-K is set forth under Part I, Item 2 of this report.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report, as required by paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Nothing to report with respect to the period covered by this report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. of Part 1 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item  4. (Removed and Reserved).

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The exhibits required to be furnished with this report are listed on the exhibit index attached hereto.

 

41


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: November 9, 2011   AMERIS BANCORP
 

/s/ Dennis J. Zember Jr.

 

Dennis J. Zember Jr., Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized signatory

and principal accounting and financial officer)

 

42


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

No.

 

Description

  3.1   Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Regulation A Offering Statement on Form 1-A filed with the Commission on August 14, 1987).
  3.2   Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 28, 1996).
  3.3   Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Ameris Bancorp’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the Commission on July 17, 1996).
  3.4   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 25, 1998).
  3.5   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 26, 1999).
  3.6   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.9 to Ameris Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).
  3.7   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 1, 2005).
  3.8   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 21, 2008).
  3.9   Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 1, 2011).
  3.10   Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ameris Bancorp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Ameris Bancorp’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2005).
31.1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
31.2   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
32.1   Section 1350 Certification by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
32.2   Section 1350 Certification by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
101   Interactive data file

 

43