Edgar Filing: QUEPASA CORP

Quepasa Corporation

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

———————

FORM 10-Q

———————

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2009

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 001-33105

Quepasa Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		86-0879433
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

224 Datura Street, Ste. 1100 West Palm Beach, FL		33401
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(561) 491-4181

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at November 3, 2009
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share		12,733,686 shares

UNITED STATES
QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2008

Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009(Unaudited)

Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 5. Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

EXHIBIT INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,074,308		$	4,932,629
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $5,000 and $6,000, respectively		34,247			21,775
Other current assets		134,561			397,582
Total current assets		2,243,116			5,351,986

Property and equipment, net		537,906			916,442
Notes receivable, net of discount in 2008		250,000			274,595
Other assets		125,992			198,682
Total assets	$	3,157,014		$	6,741,705

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	161,088		$	60,694
Accrued expenses		111,729			182,047
Accrued dividends		139,375			55,750
Unearned grant income		13,777			29,545
Total current liabilities		425,969			328,036

Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $2,002,136 and $2,216,529, respectively		5,523,401			5,074,858
Total liabilities		5,949,370			5,402,894

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (see Note 6)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized - 5,000,000 shares; 25,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009		25			25
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized - 50,000,000 shares; 12,736,186shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 12,715,411 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008		12,736			12,715
Additional paid-in capital		153,918,710			149,973,703
Accumulated deficit		(156,716,828	)		(148,647,732	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		(6,999	)		100
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(2,792,356	)		1,338,811
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	3,157,014		$	6,741,705

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss)

(Unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
REVENUES	$	51,827		$	10,989		$	197,018		$	42,626
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Sales and marketing		111,774			89,357			355,111			231,032
Product development and content		718,533			1,184,884			2,174,999			2,954,330
General and administrative		1,796,930			2,097,035			4,762,634			5,586,827
Depreciation and amortization		130,527			113,710			394,030			335,133
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES		2,757,764			3,484,986			7,686,774			9,107,322
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(2,705,937	)		(3,473,997	)		(7,489,756	)		(9,064,696	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income		10,128			34,544			36,051			132,048
Interest expense		(151,500	)		(151,502	)		(452,106	)		(779,315	)
Gain (Loss) on disposal, net		––			––			––			(42,977	)
Gain on extinguishment of debt		––			––			––			5,056,052
Loss on settlement of receivable		(100,000	)		––			(100,000	)		––
Other income		9,041			511,371			20,340			530,850
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(232,331	)		394,413			(495,715	)		4,896,658
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(2,938,268	)		(3,079,584	)		(7,985,471	)		(4,168,038	)
Income taxes		––			––			––			––
NET LOSS	$	(2,938,268	)	$	(3,079,584	)	$	(7,985,471	)	$	(4,168,038	)
Preferred stock dividends		(27,875	)		(27,875	)		(83,625	)		(27,875	)
NET LOSS ALLOCABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	(2,966,143	)	$	(3,107,459	)	$	(8,069,096	)	$	(4,195,913	)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE ALLOCABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.63	)	$	(0.33	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING:
BASIC AND DILUTED		12,729,261			12,654,887			12,722,412			12,563,155

NET LOSS	$	(2,938,268	)	$	(3,079,584	)	$	(7,985,471	)	$	(4,168,038	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(509	)		5,159			(7,099	)		6,832
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(2,938,777	)	$	(3,074,425	)	$	(7,992,570	)	$	(4,161,206	)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2009

(Unaudited)


															Accumulated			Total
									Additional						Other			Stockholders’
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid-in			Accumulated			Comprehensive			Equity
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Income			(Deficit)
Balance—December 31, 2008		25,000	$	25		12,715,411	$	12,715		149,973,703		$	(148,647,732	)	$	100		$	1,338,811
Vesting of stock options for compensation		––		––		––		––		3,948,254			––			––			3,948,254
Issuance (cancellation) of common stock for professional services		––		––		––		––		(20,470	)		––			––			(20,470	)
Issuance of common stock to directors for compensation		––		––		20,775		21		17,223			––			––			17,244
Preferred stock dividends		––		––		––		––		––			(83,625	)		––			(83,625	)
Foreign currency translation adjustment		––		––		––		––		––			––			(7,099	)		(7,099	)
Net loss		––		––		––		––		––			(7,985,471	)		––			(7,985,471	)
Balance—June 30, 2009		25,000	$	25		12,736,186	$	12,736		153,918,710		$	(156,716,828	)	$	(6,999	)	$	(2,792,356	)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008
*Cash flows from operating activities:*
Net loss	$	(7,985,471	)	$	(4,168,038	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		394,030			335,133
Gain on extinguishment of debt		––			(5,056,052	)
Write-off of accounts payable		––			(508,610	)
Loss on settlement of receivable		100,000			––
Vesting of stock options for compensation		3,948,254			4,450,456
Issuance of common stock to directors for compensation		17,244			63,796
Issuance/ (cancellation) of common stock and stock options for professional services		(20,471	)		268,626
Loss / (Gain) on disposal of property and equipment		––			42,977
Grant income		(15,768	)		(21,251	)
Bad debt expense		5,996			15,496
Non-cash interest related to notes receivable		(22,803	)		(21,167	)
Non-cash interest related to MATT.org agreement		––			379,243
Non-cash interest related to notes payable		234,150			213,337
Amortization of discounts on notes payable and debt issuance costs		217,956			198,795
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(18,468	)		7,486
Other current assets and other assets		279,547			(163,125	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		30,076			(338,168	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,835,728	)		(4,301,066	)
*Cash flows from investing activities:*
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		––			10,601
Purchase of property and equipment		(15,494	)		(431,134	)
Advance to BRC / La Alianza		––			(350,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(15,494	)		(770,533	)
*Cash flows from financing activities:*
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants		––			377,500
Debt issuance costs associated with issuance of notes payable		––			(40,481	)
Proceeds from the issuance of notes payable		––			7,000,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		––			7,337,019
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate on cash		(7,099	)		6,832
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(2,858,321	)		2,272,252
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		4,932,629			3,673,281
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2,074,308		$	5,945,533
*Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:*
Cash paid for interest	$	––		$	––
Cash paid for income taxes	$	––		$	––
*Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:*
Reduction in exercise prices of outstanding warrants recorded as additional paid-in capital	$	––		$	1,605,382
Preferred shares exchanged for long-term debt, recorded as preferred stock	$	––		$	25
Preferred shares exchanged for long-term debt, recorded as additional paid-in capital	$	––		$	2,499,975
Preferred stock dividends accrued and charged to accumulated deficit	$	83,625		$	27,875

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1—Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Quepasa Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), was incorporated in June 1997. In 2007, the Company transitioned from being a bilingual search engine into a Latino social network, with content provided by the user community. With the evolution of the Company’s Quepasa.com website into a Latino social network, the future revenue will come predominantly from display advertising , distributive social media campaigns and revenue generated from social applications. The Quepasa.com community provides users with access to an expansive, multilingual menu of resources that promote social interaction, information sharing, and other topics of interest to users. We offer online marketing capabilities which enable marketers to display their advertisements in different formats and in different locations on our website. We work with our advertisers to maximize the effectiveness of their campaigns by optimizing advertisement formats and placement on the website. The Quepasa.com website is operated and managed by the Company’s wholly-owned Mexico-based subsidiary, Quepasa.com de Mexico.

Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information required to be included in a complete set of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Quepasa.com de Mexico. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company had a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $7,985,471, net cash used in operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $2,835,728, accumulated deficit of $156,716,828 and stockholders’ deficit of $2,792,356 at September 30, 2009. However, the Company had a positive working capital of $1,817,147 at September 30, 2009 which consists primarily of cash. Based on this positive working capital and certain recent cost-cutting measures enacted by the Company, management believes the Company currently has sufficient working capital to operate through December 31, 2009 and therefore any risk of not being able to operate as a going concern is alleviated at least through December 31, 2009. However, we will need to significantly increase revenues and/ or raise additional debt or equity capital to continue through 2010 as a going concern. The current economic environment and volatility of the financial markets could significantly impact our ability to raise debt or equity. If the Company is unable to raise debt or equity within the next six months we will not be able to continue as a going concern through 2010.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1—Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Most significant estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the allowance on accrued receivables, valuation of the discount on notes payable, valuation of the commitment liability, valuation of equity instruments granted for services, valuation of repricing of warrants, valuation of preferred stock issued in exchange for liabilities and recorded gain on settlement and valuation of deferred tax assets.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions it invests with.

Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted loss per share is determined in the same manner as basic loss per share, except that the number of shares is increased to include potentially dilutive securities using the treasury stock method. Since the Company incurred a net loss in all periods presented, all potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share since the effect of including them is anti-dilutive.

The following table summarizes the number of dilutive securities outstanding for each of the periods presented, but not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share:


	September 30,
	2009		2008
Stock options		6,415,187		6,368,819
Warrants		4,432,500		4,432,500
Totals		10,847,687		10,801,319

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Effective for all interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) became the sole authoritative source for Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP) in the United States of America and superceded all previous Level a – d sources of US GAAP.

The following discusses accounting standards adopted by various bodies that have been incorporated into the authoritative FASB Codification:

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance on subsequent events. This guidance does not result in significant changes in the subsequent events that an entity reports in its financial statements. The guidance requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This guidance was effective for the Company in the second quarter of 2009, and the required disclosure has been included in the consolidated financial statements. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance and as a result evaluates its options, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for under GAAP. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statement of operations as Other income (expense). Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification under GAAP are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. The adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1—Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance which identifies the sources of accounting principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of this guidance has not had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance that requires the issuer to separately account for the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The guidance will result in companies recognizing higher interest expense in the statement of operations due to amortization of the discount that results from separating the liability and equity components. This guidance was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Through September 30, 2009, there was no impact of adopting this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued guidance that amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under GAAP. This guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Through September 30, 2009, there was no impact of of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance that amends and expands the disclosure requirement for derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires enhanced disclosure about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedge items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This guidance is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. Through September 30, 2009, there was no impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted guidance that defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued further guidance, which delays the effective date of this guidance for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Excluded from the scope of the guidance are certain leasing transactions accounted for under GAAP. The exclusion does not apply to fair value measurements of assets and liabilities recorded as a result of a lease transaction but measured pursuant to other pronouncements within the scope of this guidance.

Note 2—Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following:


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Computer equipment	$	1,787,634		$	1,770,774
Vehicles		16,676			16,406
Office furniture and equipment		123,377			122,635
Other equipment		8,719			8,577
		1,936,406			1,918,392
Less accumulated depreciation		(1,398,500	)		(1,001,950	)
Property and equipment—net	$	537,906		$	916,442

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 2—Property and Equipment (Continued)

Depreciation expense was $130,527 and $113,710 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Depreciation expense was $394,030 and $328,363 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Note 3—Note Receivable

On March 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with BRC Group, LLC (“BRC”) for a maximum amount of $600,000. Among other things, pursuant to the terms of the Loan Agreement: (i) the $300,000 advanced on January 9, 2008 by the Company pursuant to the BRC Note becomes advancement under the terms of the Loan Agreement; and (ii) the Company agreed to advance BRC an additional $50,000 on April 1, 2008.

BRC executed a noninterest bearing promissory note on March 27, 2008, in favor of the Company and agreed to repay all loans made by the Company under the Loan Agreement by January 8, 2011. In exchange for the noninterest bearing promissory note, BRC granted the Company an Equity Interests Purchase Warrant, exercisable in the event of default, and a Right of Purchase and Right of First Refusal Agreement (“Warrant Rights”).

Also on March 27, 2008, and in connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company entered into a Website Development and Hosting Agreement with BRC. On April 1, 2008, the Company advanced $50,000 to BRC under the terms of the Loan Agreement. The Company has not advanced any additional funds to BRC.

Under the terms of the agreement BRC would have been due a third advance in the amount of $250,000 on September 1, 2008 if BRC was not in breach of the agreement and only then at the discretion of the Company. The Company exercised its discretion and declined to make the loan advance. The Company has learned that BRC materially breached the terms of the loan agreement. On April 6, 2009, BRC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Company filed an Answer with counterclaims alleging a default by BRC and to accelerate the note.

On September 22, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement”) with BRC. Under the Settlement, BRC’s indebtedness to the Company was reduced from $350,000 to $250,000, evidenced by a new promissory note (the “Note”) dated September 22, 2009. The Note contains a repayment term of 18 months commencing June 1, 2011, bearing interest at the rate of 4% per annum, such interest to begin accruing February 1, 2011. As collateral for the Note, BRC issued the Company a warrant (the “Warrant”) permitting the Company to receive up to a 30% membership interest in BRC upon default. If BRC defaults under the Note and the Warrant is exercised, BRC shall have 90 days to repurchase the membership interest for the balance of the remaining principal and interest to date.

As a result of the Settlement, the Company recognized a loss of $100,000 in the Other Income (Expense) line of the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the third quarter of 2009. As a result of the change in the prior note from non-interest bearing to an interest bearing note, the Company wrote off a discount of $52,602, which had been calculated using a 12.75% imputed interest rate, with an equal value assigned to Warrant Rights, which discount had previously been included in the Other Assets line of the balance sheet.

As a result of the Settlement and the Note, BRC and the Company agreed to a mutual release of the current litigation between the parties by filing a dismissal of the litigation with prejudice. Furthermore, BRC and the Company agreed to terminate all prior agreements between each other entered into before September 22, 2009, along with all duties rights and obligations thereunder.

The parties have not yet agreed upon the essential language of the settlement documents and may return to litigation. In such circumstances the loss and write off of the discount would be reversed.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4—Long-term Debt

Corporate Sponsorship and Management Services Agreement

On November 20, 2006, in connection with a financing transaction, the Company entered into Corporate Sponsorship and Management Services Agreement (the “CSMSA”) with MATT Inc. and Mexicans & Americans Thinking Together Foundation, Inc. (the “Organization”). The CSMSA provided that the Company will develop, operate and host the Organization’s website and provide to it all the services necessary to conduct such operations. During the first three years of the term of the CSMSA, the Organization agreed to reimburse the Company for its costs and expenses in providing these services, not to exceed $500,000 per annum. The CSMSA further provided that the Company will pay the Organization’s operating costs through October 2016 (including certain special event costs commencing in year four), up to a cap of $1,200,000 per annum minus the Company’s costs and expenses for providing the services described above. The Organization’s obligations to pay any costs and expenses due to the Company were guaranteed by MATT Inc.

The Company established a reasonable estimate of the long-term debt based on the present value calculation of the expected payout of $1,200,000 per year, or $300,000 per quarter, through October 2016, discounted at a 12% annual rate, which was based on available borrowing rates.

On June 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement (the “Transaction”) with the Organization terminating the CSMSA. In consideration for the Transaction, the Company issued 25,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $2,500,000 (the “Preferred Stock”) to the Organization. The estimated fair value of the preferred stock was also $2,500,000 based on various factors, including the share price of common stock into which the preferred stock may convert and based on the preferences. The Company also provided the Organization with piggyback registration rights for the shares of common stock acquired by the Organization upon conversion of the Preferred Stock.

The effect of the Transaction was to eliminate the Company’s current and future obligations for the Organization’s operating costs under the CSMSA for which the Company had recorded a reasonable estimate of $7,556,052 as of June 30, 2008. The Company recognized a gain on the extinguishment of the long-term debt of $5,056,052, the difference between the value of the long-term liabilities and the value of preferred stock issued in exchange for the debt as of June 30, 2008. See Note 7 below.

Note 5—Notes Payable

On January 25, 2008, the Company and MATT Inc. entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “MATT Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the MATT Agreement: (i) MATT Inc. invested $5,000,000 in Quepasa and Quepasa issued MATT Inc. a subordinated promissory note due October 16, 2016 with 4.46% interest per annum (the “MATT Note”); (ii) the exercise price of MATT Inc.’s outstanding Series 1 Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was reduced from $12.50 per share to $2.75 per share; (iii) the exercise price of MATT Inc.’s outstanding Series 2 Warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was reduced from $15.00 per share to $2.75 per share; and (iv) the Amended and Restated Support Agreement between the Company and MATT Inc. was terminated, which terminates MATT Inc.’s obligation to provide the Company with the use of a corporate jet for up to 25 hours per year through October 2016. Debt issuance costs of $24,580 related to this transaction have been capitalized within the Other Assets section of the balance sheet and will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the note. The balance of deferred debt issuance costs was $19,845 at September 30, 2009.

On January 25, 2008, the Company and Richard L. Scott Investments, LLC (“RSI”) entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “RSI Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the RSI Agreement: (i) RSI invested $2,000,000 in Quepasa and Quepasa issued RSI a subordinated promissory note due March 21, 2016 with 4.46% interest per annum (the “RSI Note”); (ii) the exercise price of RSI’s outstanding Series 2 Warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was reduced from $4.00 per share to $2.75 per share; and (iii) the exercise price of RSI’s outstanding Series 3 Warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was reduced from $7.00 per share to $2.75 per share. Debt issuance costs of $15,901 related to this transaction have been capitalized within the Other Assets section of the balance sheet and will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the note. The balance of deferred debt issuance costs was $12,623 at September 30, 2009.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5—Notes Payable (Continued)

Notes payable consist of the following at September 30, 2009:


	MATT			RSI			Total
Notes Payable, face amount	$	5,000,000		$	2,000,000		$	7,000,000
Discounts on Notes:
Revaluation of Warrants		(1,341,692	)		(263,690	)		(1,605,382	)
Termination of Jet Rights		(878,942	)		––			(878,942	)
Accumulated Amortization		427,822			54,367			482,189
Total Discounts		(1,792,812	)		(209,323	)		(2,002,135	)
Accrued Interest		375,383			150,153			525,536
Notes Payable, net	$	3,582,571		$	1,940,830		$	5,523,401

Note 6—Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

On March 20, 2008, the Company terminated its future lease obligations of $344,495, relating to one of its operating leases for office space in Scottsdale, Arizona. Under the terms of the Lease Termination Agreement, the Company paid $64,261 to the Lessor and forfeited the security deposit in the amount of $44,703.

The Company leases its facilities under three non-cancelable operating leases which expire in 2010 and 2012. Future minimum lease payments under these leases as of September 30, 2009 are as follows:


Remainder of 2009	$	35,232
2010		99,360
2011		85,504
2012		64,128
	$	284,224

Litigation

From time to time, we are party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course and are incidental to our business. There are currently no such pending proceedings to which we are a party that our management believes will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management, will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting periods.

Note 7—Series A Preferred Stock

On June 30, 2008, the Company entered into the Transaction with the Organization terminating the CSMSA, see note 4. In consideration for the Transaction, the Company issued the Organization 25,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001, with a liquidation preference of $2,500,000. The Company also provided the Organization with piggyback registration rights for the shares of common stock acquired by the Organization upon conversion of the Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock may be converted (i) upon election of the Company; (ii) upon liquidation; or (iii) upon election of the Organization after one year. The Preferred Stock may be converted at the Stated Value of $100.00 per share for a similar value of Common Stock at Fair Market Value, with no fractional shares. Dividends on the Preferred Stock accrue without Board approval from the date of issuance at the rate per annum of 4.46% on the Stated Value and are cumulative. Dividends are payable in a lump sum at liquidation or conversion. Accrued dividends were $139,375 at September 30, 2009.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the new fair value recognition provisions for stock based compensation under US GAAP using the modified-prospective transition method. Since all share-based payments made prior to January 1, 2006 were fully vested, compensation cost recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 represents the compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 based upon the grant-date fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The fair values of share-based payments are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based on weighted average assumptions. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award.

In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 110, which is now incorporated into the FASB Codification. This guidance allows companies, in certain circumstances, to utilize a simplified method in determining the expected term of stock option grants when calculating the compensation expense to be recorded under US GAAP. The simplified method can be used after December 31, 2007 only if a company’s stock option exercise experience does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected option term. Through 2007, we used the simplified method to determine the expected option term, based upon the vesting and original contractual terms of the option. On January 1, 2008, we continued to use the simplified method to determine the expected option term since the Company’s stock option exercise experience does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected option term.

The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Stock Option Plans

1998 Stock Option Plan

In October 1998, the Company stockholders adopted and later amended the 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”), which provides for the granting of options to employees, officers, directors and consultants. The 1998 Plan permits the granting of incentive stock options meeting the requirements of Section 422A of the Internal Revenue Code as well as non-qualified stock options. The Company reserved 6,000,000 shares of common stock to be granted under the 1998 Plan. Incentive stock options are issuable only to employees, while non-qualified options may be issued to non-employee directors, consultants and others, as well as to employees.

Stock options granted pursuant to the 1998 Plan may not have an option price that is less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock options granted to significant stockholders must have an exercise price of not less than 110% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Generally, options granted under the 1998 Plan vest ratably over a three year service period and expire ten years from the date of the grant (or 90 days after the termination of employment). The Board of Directors of the Company may modify the exercise price, vesting term and expiration date of the individual grants at their discretion.

The fair values of share-based payments are estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model that uses the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The Company has elected to use the simplified method described in Staff Accounting Bulletin 107, “Share-Based Payment,” to estimate the expected term of employee stock options. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

A summary of stock option activity under the 1998 Stock Option Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:


	Number of Stock Options			Weighted- Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value



Options
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 (1)	200,000		$	2.36
Granted	––		$	––
Exercised	––		$	––
Forfeited or expired (1)	(195,000	)	$	2.23
Outstanding at September 30, 2009	5,000		$	1.00		6.7	$	2,350
Exercisable at September 30, 2009	5,000		$	1.00		6.7	$	2,350

———————

(1)

Includes 100,000 outstanding and exercisable options to purchase common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $1.50 per share being held by consultants.

In September 2006, the Board of Directors approved, the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (See 2006 Stock Incentive Plan section below). On June 27, 2007, the stockholders approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. As a result, no new awards will be available for issuance under the 1998 Plan, effective September 2006. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 was $0 and $621,500, respectively.

2006 Stock Incentive Plan

On June 27, 2007, the stockholders approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”), providing for the issuance of up to 3,700,000 shares of common stock plus an additional number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares previously granted under the 1998 Stock Option Plan that either terminate, expire, or lapse after the date of the Board of Directors’ approval of the 2006 Plan.

In April 2008, our Board of Directors approved and on June 27, 2008, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan to authorize the issuance of an additional 2,000,000 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2009, there were 504,213 shares of common stock available for grant under the 2006 Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the 2006 Plan, eligible individuals may be granted incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, or stock grant awards.

A summary of stock option activity under the 2006 Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:


	Number of Stock Options			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Aggregate Intrinsic Value



Options
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 (1) (2)		6,484,687		$	2.85
Granted		317,500		$	0.70
Exercised		––		$	––
Forfeited or expired		(392,000	)	$	2.75
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 (1)		6,410,187		$	1.13		8.1	$	2,774,210
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 (3)		3,381,447		$	1.21		8.2	$	1,430,142

———————

(1)

Includes 486,000 outstanding options to purchase common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $2.83 per share being held by consultants.

(2)

Includes 1,649,000 performance based options, of which 1,007,040 have been expensed.

(3)

Includes 224,333 exercisable options to purchase common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $2.51 per share being held by consultants

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 was $1.28 and $2.30, respectively. There were no options exercised under this plan during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008. The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:


	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2009		2008
Risk-free interest rate:		2.51%		3.10%
Expected term:	4.2 Years		5.7 Years
Expected dividend yield:		––		––
Expected volatility:		106%		142%

On July 8, 2009, the board of directors authorized the re-pricing of 5,751,937 existing stock options to a new exercise price of $1.00 per share in order to provide incentive for certain key employees. Some of the re-priced options were granted to the Company’s named executive officers including: 2,268,466 to John Abbott, Chief Executive Officer, 1,826,971 to Michael Matte, the Chief Financial Officer and 732,500 to Louis Bardov, the Chief Technology Officer. The financial impact of this transaction is an increase of $1,052,010 in stock based compensation to be amortized over the remaining life of the options. The re-pricing is subject to meeting performance standards set by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense for the vesting of options of $1,560,004 and $2,170,795 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $5,397,150 and $4,437,079 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As of September 30, 2009, there was $5,762,560 in total unrecognized compensation cost, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1 year.

Unrestricted Shares

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company granted no unrestricted common stock. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $29,082 for the unrestricted shares being amortized for a prepaid issuance to a consultant in 2008 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009 there was no unrecognized stock based compensation related to unrestricted shares.

Restricted Shares

On April 28, 2009, the Board of Directors granted 27,700 shares of restricted common stock to the Company’s non-employee directors for compensation during 2009 under the 2006 Plan. The restricted shares vest monthly on the last day of the month through December 31, 2009. Restricted shares activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows:


				Weighted-Average Share Price
	Shares			Weighted-Average Share Price
Unvested at January 1, 2009		20,000		$	2.48
Granted		27,700		$	0.83
Vested during period		(20,775	)	$	0.83
Cancelled during period		(20,000	)	$	2.48
Unvested at September 30, 2009		6,925		$	0.83

The fair value of the restricted shares is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The Company recognized a net reversal of $3,228 in stock-based compensation expense for restricted shares that were cancelled during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, there was $5,748 in unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested restricted share grants.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9—Warrants

In December 2005, the Company issued warrants to purchase 235,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share to investors in exchange for the exercise of warrants to purchase 235,000 shares of common stock which were previously issued to the investors in September 2004. Warrants to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock were exercised in 2006. In October 2008, the Company extended the expiration date of the remaining warrants to purchase 222,500 shares of common stock one year at an increased exercise price of $4.50 per share. Warrants to purchase 222,500 shares of common stock remain outstanding at September 30, 2009 and expire in November 2009. The fair value of the warrant extension of $49,435 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions and recognized in stock compensation expenses on the accompanying statements of operations:


Risk-free interest rate:		0.45%
Expected term:		1.0 years
Expected dividend yield:		—
Expected volatility:		79.38%

In January 2006, the Company issued warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share to an investor in exchange for the exercise of warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock which were previously issued to the investor in September 2004. In October 2008, the Company extended the expiration date of the warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock one year at an increased exercise price of $4.50 per share. These warrants were still outstanding at September 30, 2009 and expire in November 2009. The fair value of the warrant extension of $2,222 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions and recognized in stock compensation expenses on the accompanying statements of operations:


Risk-free interest rate:		0.45%
Expected term:		1.0 years
Expected dividend yield:		—
Expected volatility:		79.38%

In March 2006, the Company issued warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.55 per share as compensation to its Chief Executive Officer. These warrants were still outstanding on September 30, 2009 and expire in March 2016. The fair value of these warrants of $667,581 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions listed below and recognized in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statements of operations.


Risk-free interest rate:		4.68%
Expected term:		5 years
Expected dividend yield:		0.00%
Expected volatility:		163.73%

During March 2006, the Company issued three series (Series 1, 2 and 3) of warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock each at exercise prices of $2.87, $4.00, and $7.00 as compensation for certain strategic initiatives, including acquiring the services of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The Series 1 warrant was exercised in 2006. 50% (1,000,000) of the remaining warrants were owned by RSI. On January 25, 2008, the Company and RSI entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “RSI Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the RSI Agreement the exercise price of RSI’s outstanding warrants were reduced to $2.75 per share. The warrant re-pricing resulted in a discount on the Note Payable of $263,690, to be amortized over the life of the note, see Note 6. The Series 2 and Series 3 warrants were still outstanding at September 30, 2009 and expire in March 2016. The fair value of the warrant re-pricing was determined by comparing the fair value of the modified warrant with the fair value of the unmodified warrant on the modification date and recording any excess as a discount on the note. The fair value of the modified warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9—Warrants (Continued)


Risk-free interest rate:		2.81%
Expected term:		4.08 years
Expected dividend yield:		—
Expected volatility:		105.68%

The remaining 500,000 of the Series 2 and Series 3 warrants priced at $4.00 and $7.00, respectively, were still outstanding at December 31, 2008 and expire in March 2016. The fair value of these warrants of $3,693,990 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions listed below and recognized in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statements of operations.


	Warrant #1		Warrants #2 and #3
Risk-free interest rate:		4.69%		4.68%
Expected term:	0.25 years		5 years
Expected dividend yield:		0.00%		0.00%
Expected volatility:		53.98%		163.73%

In October 2006, the Company issued two series of warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock each at exercise prices of $12.50 and $15.00 per share to MATT Inc. in connection with the issuance of common stock. On January 25, 2008, the Company and MATT Inc. entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “MATT Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the MATT Agreement the exercise price of MATT Inc.’s outstanding warrants were reduced to $2.75 per share. The warrant re-pricing resulted in a discount on the Note Payable of $1,341,692, to be amortized over the life of the note, see Note 6 above. These warrants expire in October 2016 and were still outstanding as of September 30, 2009. The fair value of the warrant re-pricing was determined by comparing the fair value of the modified warrant with the fair value of the unmodified warrant on the modification date and recording any excess as a discount on the note. The fair value of the modified warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as appropriately discounted for these noncompensatory warrants using the method described in SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” with the following assumptions:


Risk-free interest rate:		2.81%
Expected term:		4.36 years
Expected dividend yield:		—
Expected volatility:		103.55%

A summary of warrant activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is as follows:


Outstanding at December 31, 2008	4,432,500
Issued	—
Exercised	—
Expired	—
Outstanding at September 30, 2009	4,432,500

Note 10—Related Party Transactions

Alonso Ancira serves on the Company’s Board of Directors as a non-employee director. Mr. Ancira also serves on the Board of Directors of the Organization and is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of MATT Inc. The Company has participated in several significant transactions with MATT Inc. and the Organization; Note 4 - Long-term debt, Note 5 - Notes Payable, Note 7 – Preferred Stock, and Note 9 – Warrant Re-pricing. MATT Inc. is also the Company’s largest shareholder. These relationships do not qualify as related parties for accounting purposes under GAAP.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Company Overview

In 2007, Quepasa transitioned from being a bilingual search engine into a bilingual portal and Hispanic social network. With the evolution of our website into a Hispanic portal and social network, we expect future revenues will come from predominately display advertising, distributive social media campaigns and revenue generated from social applications. In December 2006, the portal service of Quepasa was discontinued.

Highlights for the first nine months of 2009 included:

Our website traffic continued to show growth as the year evolved. The site had 2,322,273 unique visitors in the first nine months of 2008 and 12,923,628 in 2009, a 457% increase. In part, this was due to our improved ability to deliver emails inviting persons to become members of Quepasa.

Although still not material, revenue increased by 362% to $197,018.

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In addition, there are other items within our financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed critical as defined above. Changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a material impact on our financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions under GAAP, using the modified-prospective transition method. Since all share-based payments made prior to January 1, 2006 were fully vested, compensation cost recognized during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 represents the compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 based upon the grant-date fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

In December 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 110. This guidance allows companies, in certain circumstances, to utilize a simplified method in determining the expected term of stock option grants when calculating the compensation expense to be recorded under SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, for employee stock options. The simplified method can be used after December 31, 2007 only if a company’s stock option exercise experience does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected option term. Through 2007, we used the simplified method to determine the expected option term, based upon the vesting and original contractual terms of the option. On January 1, 2008, we continued

to use the simplified method to determine the expected option term since the Company’s stock option exercise experience does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected option term.

Contingencies

The Company accrues for contingent obligations, including estimated management support agreements and legal costs, when the obligation is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As facts concerning contingencies become known we reassess our position and make appropriate adjustments to the financial statements. Estimates that are particularly sensitive to future changes include those related to tax, legal, and other regulatory matters that are subject to change as events evolve and additional information becomes available.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount that, based on available evidence, is more likely than not to be realized.

Results of Operations

Revenue Sources

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our revenue was generated from one principal source, revenue earned from the sale of banner advertising on our website.

Banner Advertising Revenue: Banner advertising revenue is generated when an advertiser purchases a banner placement within our quepasa.com website. We recognize revenue related to banner advertisements upon delivery. Approximately 99% of our revenue came from banner advertising.

Virtual Currency Revenue: Virtual currency revenue is generated when users buy QDollars on the site and use that currency to send a broad range of virtual gifts from the Quepasa storefront. We recognize revenue related to virtual currency upon receipt.

Operating Expenses

Our principal operating expenses are divided into the following categories:

Product Development and Content Expenses: Product development and content expenses consist of personnel costs associated with the development, testing and upgrading of our website and systems, content fees, and purchases of specific technology, particularly software and hardware related to our infrastructure upgrade.

Sales and Marketing Expenses: Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and expenses of marketing and sales personnel, and other marketing-related expenses including our mass media-based branding and advertising.

General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs related to corporate personnel, occupancy costs, general operating costs and corporate professional fees, such as legal and accounting fees.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses: Our depreciation and amortization are non-cash expenses which have consisted primarily of depreciation related to our property and equipment.

Other Income (Expense): Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest earned, interest expense and earned grant income. We have invested our cash in AAA rated, fully liquid instruments. Interest expense relates to our Corporate Sponsorship Agreement and Note Purchase Agreements. Earned grant income represents the amortized portion of a cash grant received from the Mexican government for approved capital expenditures. The grant is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the purchased assets.

Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2009 with the three months ended September 30, 2008

The following table sets forth a modified version of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss that is used in the following discussions of our results of operations:


	For the the three months ended September 30,
	2009			2008			Change ($)			Change (%)
REVENUES	$	51,827		$	10,989		$	40,838			372	%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Sales and marketing		111,774			89,357			22,417			25	%
Product development and content		718,533			1,184,884			(466,351	)		-39	%
General and administrative		1,796,930			2,097,035			(300,105	)		-14	%
Depreciation and amortization		130,527			113,710			16,817			15	%
Operating Expenses		2,757,764			3,484,986			(727,222	)		-21	%

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(2,705,937	)		(3,473,997	)		768,060			-22	%

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income		10,128			34,544			(24,416	)		-71	%
Interest expense		(151,500	)		(151,502	)		2			0	%
Other income		(90,959	)		511,371			(602,330	)		-118	%
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(232,331	)		394,413			(626,744	)		-159	%

NET LOSS	$	(2,938,268	)	$	(3,079,584	)	$	141,316			-5	%

Revenues

Our revenues were $51,827 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $40,838 compared to 2008. In February 2008, we re-launched our website. Website traffic has increased since the re-launch. The site had 1,775,432 unique visitors in the third quarter of 2008 and 5,288,445 in 2009, an 198% increase. We believe there will be a direct correlation between website traffic and our ability to increase revenue.

As part of our website development strategy, we have focused on establishing a platform for sustained, viral growth—based on (i) simple user registration and invitation process; (ii) effective email deliverability; and (iii) a simplified way to navigate the home page for our members. In June 2008, we redesigned the sign-up and invitation pages of our site, resulting in approximately a 50% increase in the number of new users who invited friends and contacts to join Quepasa.com. In addition, with the help of a third-party consultant, we have substantially reduced the number of Quepasa.com invitation emails that fail to reach recipients’ email inboxes. Improved deliverability, together with the redesign of our sign-up and invitation steps, has resulted in significant gains in the number new registered users and site traffic.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Sales and Marketing: Sales and marketing expenses increased $22,417, or 25%, to $111,774 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had increases commissions of $22,000 as a result of increased ad sales.

Product Development and Content: Product development and content expenses decreased $466,351, or 39%, to $718,533 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is attributable to a focused effort to reduce costs. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had decreases in stock based compensation of $275,000, consulting fees of $41,000, a decrease in U.S. salaries of $30,000, a decrease in salaries and associated payroll costs of $67,000 due to the change in exchange rates for our product development and technology personnel within Quepasa.com de Mexico, which, under the direction of our U.S.-based Chief Technology Officer, provides substantially all of our design, translation services, and website management and development services.

General and Administrative: General and administrative expenses decreased $300,105, or 14%, to $1,796,930, for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The significant changes consisted of:

a decrease in stock based compensation of $426,000; and

a decrease in salaries and associated payroll costs of $27,000 due to the change in exchange rates for our general and administrative personnel within Quepasa.com de Mexico;

partially offset by, a increase in U.S. salaries and related payroll costs of $54,000, due to unusually low salary in 2008 caused by reduction of some salaries in exchange for stock based compensation;

an increase in professional fees of $34,000, primarily comprised of legal fees; and

an increase in managed hosting of $36,000 for the new data center in Dallas.

Stock Based Compensation: Stock based compensation expense, which is included in the other operating expense categories as discussed above, decreased $697,312 to $1,228,685 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is attributable to higher stock based compensation in 2008 related to vesting of a performance based grant and an effort to reduce salaries in exchange for stock based compensation. Stock based compensation expense represented 57% and 65% of operating expenses for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At September 30, 2009, we had $5,762,560 of unrecognized stock based compensation expense, almost all of which we expect to recognize over the next four quarters.


	For the three months ended September 30,
	2009		2008
Sales and marketing		38,011		34,461
Product and content development		251,489		526,833
General and administrative		1,291,419		1,716,937
Total Stock Based Compensation		1,580,919		2,278,231

Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense increased $16,817, or 15%, to $130,527 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase is attributable to fixed asset additions to create a primary data center in the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area leaving the redundant data center in the Arizona metropolitan area as a backup.

Other Income/ Expense: Other income decreased $626,744 to other expense of $232,331 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to the write-off of invoices totaling $508,610 for a technical consultant in 2008. This decrease is also attributable to a reduction of $100,000 of a note receivable as discussed in Note 3 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. This decrease is also attributable to a reduction of $24,000 in interest income due to lower interest rates and lower cash balances.

Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 with the nine months ended September 30, 2008

The following table sets forth a modified version of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss that is used in the following discussions of our results of operations:


	For the the nine months ended September 30,
	2009			2008			Change ($)			Change (%)
REVENUES	$	197,018		$	42,626		$	154,392			362	%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Sales and marketing		355,111			231,032			124,079			54	%
Product development and content		2,174,999			2,954,330			(779,331	)		-26	%
General and administrative		4,762,634			5,586,827			(824,193	)		-15	%
Depreciation and amortization		394,030			335,133			58,897			18	%
Operating Expenses		7,686,774			9,107,322			(1,420,548	)		-16	%

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(7,489,756	)		(9,064,696	)		1,574,940			-17	%

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest income		36,051			132,048			(95,997	)		-73	%
Interest expense		(452,106	)		(779,315	)		327,209			-42	%
Gain/ (Loss) on disposal		––			(42,977	)		42,977			100	%
Gain on extinguishment of debt		––			5,056,052			(5,056,052	)		-100	%
Other income		(79,660	)		530,850			(610,510	)		-115	%
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(495,715	)		4,896,658			(5,392,373	)		-110	%

NET LOSS	$	(7,985,471	)	$	(4,168,038	)	$	(3,817,433	)		92	%

Revenues

Our revenues were $197,018 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $154,392 compared to 2008. In February 2008, we re-launched our website. Website traffic has increased since the re-launch. The site had 2,322,273 unique visitors in the first nine months of 2008 and 12,923,628 in 2009, a 457% increase. We believe there will be a direct correlation between website traffic and our ability to increase revenue.

As part of our website development strategy, we have focused on establishing a platform for sustained, viral growth—based on (i) simple user registration and invitation process; (ii) effective email deliverability; and (iii) a simplified way to navigate the home page for our members. In June 2008, we redesigned the sign-up and invitation pages of our site, resulting in approximately a 50% increase in the number of new users who invited friends and contacts to join Quepasa.com. In addition, with the help of a third-party consultant, we have substantially reduced the number of Quepasa.com invitation emails that fail to reach recipients’ email inboxes. Improved deliverability, together with the redesign of our sign-up and invitation steps, has resulted in meaningful gains in the number new registered users and site traffic.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Sales and Marketing: Sales and marketing expenses increased $124,079, or 54%, to $355,111 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had increases in stock based compensation of $62,000, commissions of $49,000 and salaries of $47,000. The increase was partially offset by a decrease of $40,000 due the shutdown of the Mexico City sales office in the first quarter of 2008.

Product Development and Content: Product development and content expenses decreased $779,331, or 26%, to $2,174,999 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is attributable to a focused effort to reduce costs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had decreases in consulting fees of $167,000, a decrease in stock based compensation of $374,000, a decrease in U.S. salaries of $70,000, and a decrease in salaries and associated payroll costs of $202,000 due to the change in exchange rates for our product development and technology personnel within Quepasa.com de Mexico, which, under the direction of our U.S.-

based Chief Technology Officer, provides substantially all of our design, translation services, and website management and development services.

General and Administrative: General and administrative expenses decreased $824,193, or 15%, to $4,762,634, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The significant changes consisted of:

a decrease in professional fees of $42,000, primarily made up of decreases in accounting fees of $106,000 partially offset by an increase in legal fees of $78,000;

a decrease in travel related expenses of $78,000;

a decrease in stock based compensation of $409,000;

a decrease in rent expenses of $197,000, due to the closing of our Scottsdale, AZ headquarters;

a decrease in salaries and related payroll costs of $60,000, due to a reduction in headcount and a reduction of some salaries in exchange for stock based compensation;

partially offset by an increase in managed hosting of $50,000 for the new data center in Dallas; and

an increase in reporting dues of $54,000.

Stock Based Compensation: Stock based compensation expense, which is included in the other operating expense categories as discussed above, decreased $720,715 to $4,119,774 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is attributable to a reduction in headcount, partially offset by an effort to reduce salaries in exchange for stock based compensation. Stock based compensation expense represented 54% and 53% of operating expenses for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. At September 30, 2009, we had $5,762,560 of unrecognized stock based compensation expense, almost all of which we expect to recognize over the next four quarters.


	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2009		2008
Sales and marketing	$	102,351	$	40,464
Product and content development		670,177		1,043,980
General and administrative		3,347,245		3,756,045
Total Stock Based Compensation	$	4,119,773	$	4,840,489

Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense increased $58,897, or 18%, to $394,030 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This increase is attributable to fixed asset additions to create a primary data center in the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area leaving the redundant data center in the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area as a backup.

Other Income (Expense): Other income decreased $5,392,373 to other expense of $495,715 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $5,056,052 recorded in the second quarter of 2008 as a result of the termination of the CSMSA discussed in Note 4 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. This decrease is also attributable to a reduction of $100,000 of a note receivable as discussed in Note 3 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. This decrease is also attributable to a reduction of $96,000 in interest income due to lower interest rates and lower cash balances. The decrease is partially offset by a reduction in interest expense of $327,000 due to the termination of the CSMSA and a loss of $43,000 on the disposal of office furniture and equipment associated with the closure of our Scottsdale, Arizona office.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(2,835,728	)	$	(4,301,066	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(15,494	)	$	(770,533	)
Net cash provided by financing activities	$	––		$	7,337,019

Cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was driven by our net loss, adjusted for non-cash items. Non-cash adjustments include depreciation and amortization, the vesting of stock options and issuance of common stock for compensation, and interest accrual and amortization of discounts associated with long-term debt. Net cash used in operations was $2,835,728 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $4,301,066 for 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash used by operations consisted primarily of a net loss of $7,985,471, offset by non-cash expenses of $394,030 in depreciation and amortization, $211,347 in non-cash interest, $217,956 in amortization of discounts on notes payable and debt issuance costs, and $3,948,254 related to the vesting of stock options. Additionally, changes in working capital impacted the net cash used in operating activities. These changes included a decrease in other current assets and other assets of $279,547, and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $30,076. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash used by operations consisted primarily of a net loss of $4,168,038 plus a gain on extinguishment of debt of $5,056,052, offset by non-cash expenses of $335,133 in depreciation and amortization, $571,413 in non-cash interest, $198,795 in amortization of discounts on notes payable and debt issuance costs, $42,977 loss on the disposal of fixed assets, and $4,782,878 related to the issuance of stock options, warrants, and common stock for compensation and professional services. Additionally, changes in working capital impacted the net cash used in operating activities. These changes included a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $338,168, offset by a decrease in other current assets and other assets of $163,125.

Net cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily attributable to the purchase of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to Investment in BRC/La Alianza of $350,000, see Note 3 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Our capital expenditures were $15,494 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $431,134 for the same period in 2008.

There was no net cash provided by or used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 came from net proceeds of $6,959,519 from our borrowing in January 2008. See Note 5 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants was $377,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.


	2009			2008
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,074,308		$	4,932,629
Total assets	$	3,157,014		$	6,741,705
Percentage of total assets		66	%		73	%

We invest excess cash predominately in liquid marketable securities to support our growing infrastructure needs for operational expansion. The majority of our cash is concentrated in one large financial institution, JP Morgan Chase.

We have substantial capital resource requirements and have generated significant losses since inception. At September 30, 2009, we had $2,074,308 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $4,932,629 at December 31, 2008, resulting in a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $2,858,321 for 2009.

The decrease in cash for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily attributed to cash used in operating activities of $2,835,728 for the period.

During the first nine months of 2009, we obtained no proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and warrants compared to $377,500 from the exercise of stock options and warrants during the first nine months of 2008.

Cash Burn Rate – Non-GAAP Financial Measurement

The Company uses a non-GAAP financial measure in evaluating its financial and operational decision making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparison. The Company believes that both management and shareholders benefit from referring to cash burn rate, a non-GAAP financial measure, in planning, forecasting and analyzing future periods. Additionally, the cash burn rate provides meaningful information about the Company’s ability to meet its working capital needs.


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(2,705,937	)		(3,473,997	)		(7,489,756	)		(9,064,696	)
NET MONTHLY LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(901,979	)		(1,157,999	)		(832,195	)		(1,007,188	)
NON CASH OPERATING EXPENSES
Stock based compensation expense		1,580,919			2,278,231			4,119,774			4,840,489
Depreciation and amortization		130,527			113,710			394,030			335,133
TOTAL NON CASH OPERATING EXPENSES		1,711,446			2,391,941			4,513,804			5,175,622

NET CASH BURN		(994,491	)		(1,082,056	)		(2,975,952	)		(3,889,074	)
NET MONTHLY CASH BURN RATE		(331,497	)		(360,685	)		(330,661	)		(432,119	)

In October 2007, a new senior management team was put into place. Along with addressing the website performance issues, the management team focused their attention on reducing costs while maintaining the efforts to improve the performance of our websites. In November 2007, the management team terminated the majority of the consulting arrangements, closed the sales office in New York, and significantly reduced the headcount at the corporate headquarters. Based on the reductions initiated by the new management team, the net cash burn rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 dropped to $331,497 and $330,661 per month, respectively. We expect a net cash burn rate of approximately $330,000 per month for the remainder of 2009, excluding any promotional activities.

Based on the reduction of the net cash burn rate, we believe that our current cash balances are sufficient to finance our current level of operations through the remainder of 2009 and through the first quarter of 2010. We expect that during the fourth quarter we will accelerate our efforts to raise additional capital. We have delayed our capital raising efforts pending the operating results of our business through the third quarter. Because of the current global recession and the impact on the global credit markets, as well as the weak market for small cap stocks, any financing, if it occurs, will involve substantial dilution to existing shareholders. We have not budgeted significant capital expenditures for 2009. The capital expenditures for 2008 were primarily to create a primary data center in the Dallas, Texas metropolitan area leaving the redundant data center in the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area as a backup.

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements in this report relating to our expectations regarding future revenues, our belief that there is a direct correlation between website traffic and our ability to generate revenue, our belief regarding the sufficiency of our cash balances, our expectations regarding the Company’s future net cash burn rate, our liquidity and our capital raising efforts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Additionally, words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “will” and similar words are used to identify forward-looking statements.

The results anticipated by any or all of these forward-looking statements might not occur. Important factors, uncertainties and risks that may cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include changes in the public’s approach to social network needs, global economic conditions and the continued slump in the capital and credit markets. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future events or otherwise. For more information regarding some of the ongoing risks and uncertainties of our business, see the risk factors contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls

We carried out an evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed in an issuer's reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms and (ii) information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures included a review of our objectives and processes and effect on the information generated for use in this report. This type of evaluation is done quarterly so that the conclusions concerning the effectiveness of these controls can be reported in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. We intend to maintain these controls as processes that may be appropriately modified as circumstances warrant.

Based on their evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information which is required to be included in our periodic reports filed with the SEC as of the filing of this report.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and its Principal Financial Officer, do not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with associated policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.

Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5.

Other Information

None

Item 6.

Exhibits

See Exhibit Index

QUEPASA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		QUEPASA CORPORATION


November 6, 2009		/s/ JOHN ABBOTT
		John Abbott
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


November 6, 2009		/s/ MICHAEL MATTE
		Michael Matte
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Certain material agreements contain representations and warranties, which are qualified by the following factors: (1) the representations and warranties contained in any agreements filed with this report were made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties and not as a means of establishing facts; (2) the agreement may have different standards of materiality than standards of materiality under applicable securities laws; (3) the representations are qualified by a confidential disclosure schedule that contains nonpublic information that is not material under applicable securities laws; (4) facts may have changed since the date of the agreements; and (5) only parties to the agreements and specified third-party beneficiaries have a right to enforce the agreements. Notwithstanding the above, any information contained in a schedule that would cause a reasonable investor to buy or sell the Company’s common stock has been included in the exhibit.


No.	Description	Incorporated By Reference
3.1	Certificates of Restated Articles of Incorporation	Form 10-QSB as filed with the SEC on August 15, 2007
3.2	Certificate of Designation	Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC on July 25, 2008
3.3	Amended and Restated Bylaws	Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 3, 2007
10.1	BRC Group, LLC Settlement Agreement	Filed with this report
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer (Section 302)	Filed with this report
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer (Section 302)	Filed with this report
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Section 906)	Furnished with this report
32.2	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Section 906)	Furnished with this report

Copies of any of the exhibits referred to above will be furnished at no cost to stockholders who make a written request therefore to Michael D. Matte, Quepasa Corporation, 224 Datura Street, Suite 1100, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.