AVA-2014.12.31-10K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
| |
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED December 31, 2014 OR
|
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
Commission file number 1-3701
__________________________________________________________________________________________
AVISTA CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Washington | | 91-0462470 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
1411 East Mission Avenue, Spokane, Washington | | 99202-2600 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 509-489-0500
Web site: http://www.avistacorp.com
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| | |
Title of Class | | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, no par value | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of Class
Preferred Stock, Cumulative, Without Par Value
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s outstanding Common Stock, no par value (the only class of voting stock), held by non-affiliates is $2,018,577,718 based on the last reported sale price thereof on the consolidated tape on June 30, 2014.
As of January 31, 2015, 62,344,484 shares of Registrant’s Common Stock, no par value (the only class of common stock), were outstanding.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Documents Incorporated By Reference
|
| | |
Document | | Part of Form 10-K into Which Document is Incorporated |
Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 7, 2015. Prior to such filing, the Proxy Statement filed in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 8, 2014. | | Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 |
INDEX
|
| | | | |
Item No. | | | Page No. | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | Part I | | |
1 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
1A. | | | | |
1B. | | | | |
2 | | | | |
| | | | |
3 | | | | |
4 | | | | * |
| | Part II | | |
5 | | | | |
6 | | | | |
7 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
7A. | | | | |
8. | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
9. | | | | * |
9A. | | | | |
9B. | | | | |
| | Part III | | |
10. | | | | |
11. | | | | |
12. | | | | |
13. | | | | |
14. | | | | |
| | Part IV | | |
15. | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
* = not an applicable item in the 2014 calendar year for Avista Corp.
ACRONYMS AND TERMS
(The following acronyms and terms are found in multiple locations within the document)
|
| | |
Acronym/Term | Meaning |
aMW | - | Average Megawatt - a measure of the average rate at which a particular generating source produces energy over a period of time |
AEL&P | - | Alaska Electric Light and Power Company, the primary operating subsidiary of AERC |
AERC | - | Alaska Energy and Resources Company, a privately-held company based in Juneau, Alaska. The Company entered into an agreement and plan of merger with AERC on November 4, 2013 and the acquisition was completed on July 1, 2014. |
AFUDC | - | Allowance for Funds Used During Construction; represents the cost of both the debt and equity funds used to finance utility plant additions during the construction period |
AM&D | - | Advanced Manufacturing and Development, does business as METALfx |
ASC | - | Accounting Standards Codification |
Avista Capital | - | Parent company to the Company’s non-utility businesses |
Avista Corp. | - | Avista Corporation, the Company |
Avista Energy | - | Avista Energy, Inc., an electricity and natural gas marketing, trading and resource management business, subsidiary of Avista Capital. This entity is currently inactive; however, we still incur legal fees associated with this entity. |
Avista Utilities | - | Operating division of Avista Corp. (not a subsidiary) comprising the regulated utility operations |
BPA | - | Bonneville Power Administration |
Capacity | - | The rate at which a particular generating source is capable of producing energy, measured in KW or MW |
Cabinet Gorge | - | The Cabinet Gorge Hydroelectric Generating Project, located on the Clark Fork River in Idaho |
Colstrip | - | The coal-fired Colstrip Generating Plant in southeastern Montana |
Coyote Springs 2 | - | The natural gas-fired combined-cycle Coyote Springs 2 Generating Plant located near Boardman, Oregon |
CT | - | Combustion turbine |
Deadband or ERM deadband | - | The first $4.0 million in annual power supply costs above or below the amount included in base retail rates in Washington under the ERM in the state of Washington |
Dekatherm | - | Unit of measurement for natural gas; a dekatherm is equal to approximately one thousand cubic feet (volume) or 1,000,000 BTUs (energy) |
Ecology | - | The state of Washington’s Department of Ecology |
Ecova | - | Ecova, Inc., a provider of facility information and cost management services for multi-site customers and energy efficiency program management for commercial enterprises and utilities throughout North America, subsidiary of Avista Capital. Ecova was sold on June 30, 2014. |
Energy | - | The amount of electricity produced or consumed over a period of time, measured in KWH or MWH. Also, refers to natural gas consumed and is measured in dekatherms. |
EPA | - | Environmental Protection Agency |
ERM | - | The Energy Recovery Mechanism, a mechanism for accounting and rate recovery of certain power supply costs accepted by the utility commission in the state of Washington |
FASB | - | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC | - | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
GAAP | - | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
GHG | - | Greenhouse gas |
GS | - | Generating station |
IPUC | - | Idaho Public Utilities Commission |
IRP | - | Integrated Resource Plan |
Jackson Prairie | - | Jackson Prairie Natural Gas Storage Project, an underground natural gas storage field located near Chehalis, Washington |
|
| | |
Juneau | - | The City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska |
kV | - | Kilovolt (1000 volts): a measure of capacity on transmission lines |
KW, KWH | - | Kilowatt (1000 watts): a measure of generating output or capability. Kilowatt-hour (1000 watt hours): a measure of energy produced. |
Lancaster Plant | - | A natural gas-fired combined cycle combustion turbine plant located in Idaho |
MPSC | - | Public Service Commission of the State of Montana |
MW, MWH | - | Megawatt: 1000 KW. Megawatt-hour: 1000 KWH. |
NERC | - | North American Electricity Reliability Corporation |
Noxon Rapids | - | The Noxon Rapids Hydroelectric Generating Project, located on the Clark Fork River in Montana |
OPUC | - | The Public Utility Commission of Oregon |
PCA | - | The Power Cost Adjustment mechanism, a procedure for accounting and rate recovery of certain power supply costs accepted by the utility commission in the state of Idaho |
PGA | - | Purchased Gas Adjustment |
PLP | - | Potentially liable party |
PUD | - | Public Utility District |
PURPA | - | The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended |
RCA | - | The Regulatory Commission of Alaska |
RTO | - | Regional Transmission Organization |
Salix LNG | - | Salix, Inc., a subsidiary of Avista Capital, specializing in small scale liquified natural gas projects, primarily in Western North America. |
Spokane Energy | - | Spokane Energy, LLC, a special purpose limited liability company and all of its membership capital is owned by Avista Corp. |
Spokane River Project | - | The five hydroelectric plants operating under one FERC license on the Spokane River (Long Lake, Nine Mile, Upper Falls, Monroe Street and Post Falls) |
Therm | - | Unit of measurement for natural gas; a therm is equal to approximately one hundred cubic feet (volume) or 100,000 BTUs (energy) |
UTC | - | Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission |
Watt | - | Unit of measurement for electricity; a watt is equal to the rate of work represented by a current of one ampere under a pressure of one volt |
Forward-Looking Statements
From time to time, we make forward-looking statements such as statements regarding projected or future:
| |
• | strategic goals and objectives; |
| |
• | business environment; and |
These statements have underlying assumptions (many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions). Such statements are made both in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including this Annual Report on Form 10-K), and elsewhere. Forward-looking statements are all statements except those of historical fact including, without limitation, those that are identified by the use of words that include “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “projects,” “predicts,” and similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements (including those made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors. Most of these factors are beyond our control and may have a significant effect on our operations, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others:
| |
• | weather conditions (temperatures, precipitation levels and wind patterns) which affect both energy demand and electric generating capability, including the effect of precipitation and temperature on hydroelectric resources, the effect of wind patterns on wind-generated power, weather-sensitive customer demand, and similar effects on supply and demand in the wholesale energy markets; |
| |
• | state and federal regulatory decisions that affect our ability to recover costs and earn a reasonable return including, but not limited to, disallowance or delay in the recovery of capital investments and operating costs and discretion over allowed return on investment; |
| |
• | volatility and illiquidity in wholesale energy markets, including the availability of willing buyers and sellers, changes in wholesale energy prices that can affect operating income, cash requirements to purchase electricity and natural gas, value received for wholesale sales, collateral required of us by counterparties on wholesale energy transactions and credit risk to us from such transactions, and the market value of derivative assets and liabilities; |
| |
• | economic conditions in our service areas, including the economy's effects on customer demand for utility services; |
| |
• | declining energy demand related to customer energy efficiency and/or conservation measures; |
| |
• | our ability to obtain financing through the issuance of debt and/or equity securities, which can be affected by various factors including our credit ratings, interest rates and other capital market conditions and the global economy; |
| |
• | the potential effects of legislation or administrative rulemaking, including possible effects on our generating resources of restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate concerns over global climate changes; |
| |
• | political pressures or regulatory practices that could constrain or place additional cost burdens on our energy supply sources, such as campaigns to halt coal-fired power generation and opposition to other thermal generation, wind turbines or hydroelectric facilities; |
| |
• | changes in actuarial assumptions, interest rates and the actual return on plan assets for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans, which can affect future funding obligations, pension and other postretirement benefit expense and the related liabilities; |
| |
• | the outcome of pending legal proceedings arising out of the “western energy crisis” of 2000 and 2001, specifically related to the Pacific Northwest refund proceedings; |
| |
• | the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies; |
| |
• | changes in environmental and endangered species laws, regulations, decisions and policies, including present and potential environmental remediation costs and our compliance with these matters; |
| |
• | wholesale and retail competition including alternative energy sources, growth in customer-owned power resource technologies that displace utility-supplied energy or that may be sold back to the utility, and alternative energy suppliers and delivery arrangements; |
| |
• | growth or decline of our customer base and the extent to which new uses for our services may materialize or existing uses may decline; |
| |
• | the ability to comply with the terms of the licenses for our hydroelectric generating facilities at cost-effective levels; |
| |
• | severe weather or natural disasters that can disrupt energy generation, transmission and distribution, as well as the availability and costs of materials, equipment, supplies and support services; |
| |
• | explosions, fires, accidents, mechanical breakdowns, avalanches or other incidents that may impair assets and may disrupt operations of any of our generation facilities, transmission and distribution systems or other operations; |
| |
• | public injuries or damage arising from or allegedly arising from our operations; |
| |
• | blackouts or disruptions of interconnected transmission systems (the regional power grid); |
| |
• | disruption to information systems, automated controls and other technologies that we rely on for our operations, communications and customer service; |
| |
• | terrorist attacks, cyber attacks or other malicious acts that may disrupt or cause damage to our utility assets or to the national economy in general, including any effects of terrorism, cyber attacks or vandalism that damage or disrupt information technology systems; |
| |
• | cyber attacks or other potential lapses that result in unauthorized disclosure of private information, which could result in liabilities against us, costs to investigate, remediate and defend, and damage to our reputation; |
| |
• | delays or changes in construction costs, and/or our ability to obtain required permits and materials for present or prospective facilities; |
| |
• | changes in the costs to implement new information technology systems and/or obstacles that impede our ability to complete such projects timely and effectively; |
| |
• | changes in the long-term global and our utilities' service area climates, which can affect, among other things, customer demand patterns and the volume and timing of streamflows to our hydroelectric resources; |
| |
• | changes in industrial, commercial and residential growth and demographic patterns in our service territory or changes in demand by significant customers; |
| |
• | the loss of key suppliers for materials or services or disruptions to the supply chain; |
| |
• | default or nonperformance on the part of any parties from which we purchase and/or sell capacity or energy; |
| |
• | deterioration in the creditworthiness of our customers; |
| |
• | potential decline in our credit ratings, with effects including impeded access to capital markets, higher interest costs, and restrictive covenants in our financing arrangements and wholesale energy contracts; |
| |
• | increasing health care costs and the resulting effect on employee injury costs and health insurance provided to our employees and retirees; |
| |
• | increasing costs of insurance, more restrictive coverage terms and our ability to obtain insurance; |
| |
• | work force issues, including changes in collective bargaining unit agreements, strikes, work stoppages, the loss of key executives, availability of workers in a variety of skill areas, and our ability to recruit and retain employees; |
| |
• | the potential effects of negative publicity regarding business practices, whether true or not, which could result in litigation or a decline in our common stock price; |
| |
• | changes in technologies, possibly making some of the current technology obsolete; |
| |
• | changes in tax rates and/or policies; |
| |
• | changes in interest rates that affect borrowing costs, our ability to effectively hedge interest rates for anticipated debt issuances, variable interest rate borrowing and the extent that we recover interest costs through utility operations; |
| |
• | potential difficulties in integrating acquired operations and in realizing expected opportunities, diversions of management resources and losses of key employees, challenges with respect to operating new businesses and other unanticipated risks and liabilities; |
| |
• | changes in our strategic business plans, which may be affected by any or all of the foregoing, including the entry into new businesses and/or the exit from existing businesses and the extent of our business development efforts where potential future business is uncertain; |
| |
• | compliance with extensive federal, state and local legislation and regulation, including numerous environmental, health, safety and other laws and regulations that affect our operations and costs; |
| |
• | our ability to fully collect the indemnification escrow amounts because of information that was covered under management's representations and warranties related to the Ecova sale which could be inaccurate or incomplete at the time of sale, or because of new information which could be identified subsequent to the sale date, and |
| |
• | adverse impacts to our Alaska operations because a majority of the hydroelectric power generation for such operations is provided by a single facility that is subject to a long-term power purchase agreement; hence any issues that negatively affect this facility’s ability to generate or transmit power, the cost and ability to replace power in the event of an extended outage, any decrease in the demand for the power generated by this facility or any loss by our subsidiary of its contractual rights with respect thereto or other adverse effect thereon could negatively affect our Alaska operations' financial results. |
Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith. We believe they are reasonable based on, without limitation, an examination of historical operating trends, our records and other information available from third parties. However, there can be no assurance that our expectations, beliefs or projections will be achieved or accomplished. Furthermore, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New risks, uncertainties and other factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all such factors, nor can we assess the effect of each such factor on our business or the extent that any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
Available Information
Our Web site address is www.avistacorp.com. We make annual, quarterly and current reports available at our Web site as soon as practicable after electronically filing these reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on our Web site is not part of this report.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
COMPANY OVERVIEW
Avista Corporation (Avista Corp. or the Company), incorporated in the territory of Washington in 1889, is primarily an electric and natural gas utility with certain other business ventures. As of December 31, 2014, we employed 1,658 people in our primary utility operations (Avista Utilities) and 216 people in our subsidiary businesses. Our corporate headquarters are in Spokane, Washington, the second-largest city in Washington. Spokane serves as the business, transportation, medical, industrial and cultural hub of the Inland Northwest region (eastern Washington and northern Idaho). Regional services include government and higher education, medical services, retail trade and finance. The Inland Northwest also coincides closely with our utility service area in Washington and Idaho. Our natural gas utility operations also include separate service areas in parts of Oregon. Through our subsidiary Alaska Electric Light and Power Company, we also provide electric services in the City and Borough of Juneau (Juneau), Alaska.
As of December 31, 2014, we have two reportable business segments as follows:
| |
• | Avista Utilities – an operating division of Avista Corp. (not a subsidiary) that comprises our regulated utility operations in the Pacific Northwest. Avista Utilities generates, transmits and distributes electricity and distributes natural gas, serving electric and gas customers in eastern Washington and northern Idaho and gas customers in parts of Oregon. We also supply electricity to a small number of customers in Montana, most of whom are employees who operate our Noxon Rapids generating facility. Avista Utilities also engages in wholesale purchases and sales of electricity and natural gas. |
| |
• | Alaska Electric Light and Power Company - the primary operating subsidiary of Alaska Energy and Resources Company (AERC), which provides electric services in the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska. We completed our acquisition of AERC on July 1, 2014, and as of that date, AERC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Avista Corp. See "Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further discussion regarding this acquisition. |
We have other businesses, including sheet metal fabrication, venture fund investments and real estate investments, as well as certain other investments of Avista Capital, Inc. (Avista Capital), which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Avista Corp. In addition, as of July 1, 2014 we own AERC and AJT Mining Properties, Inc. (AJT Mining), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AERC and is an inactive mining company holding certain properties. These activities do not represent a reportable business segment and are conducted by various direct and indirect subsidiaries of Avista Corp., including AM&D, doing business as METALfx.
Total Avista Corp. shareholders’ equity was $1,483.7 million as of December 31, 2014, of which $57.3 million represented our investment in Avista Capital and $91.0 million represented our investment in AERC.
During the first half of 2014, Avista Capital’s subsidiaries included Ecova, Inc. (Ecova), which was an 80.2 percent owned subsidiary prior to its disposition on June 30, 2014. Ecova was a provider of energy efficiency and other facility information and cost management programs and services for multi-site customers and utilities throughout North America.
See “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and “Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for information with respect to the operating performance of each business segment (and other subsidiaries). See "Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for information regarding the disposition of Ecova.
AVISTA UTILITIES
General
Through our Avista Utilities operating division, we generate, transmit and distribute electricity and distribute natural gas in the Pacific Northwest. Retail electric and natural gas customers include residential, commercial and industrial classifications. We also engage in wholesale purchases and sales of electricity and natural gas as an integral part of energy resource management and our load-serving obligation.
Avista Utilities provides electric distribution and transmission, as well as natural gas distribution, services in parts of eastern Washington and northern Idaho. We also provide natural gas distribution service in parts of northeastern and southwestern Oregon. At the end of 2014, we supplied retail electric service to 370,000 customers and retail natural gas service to 330,000 customers across Avista Utilities' service territory. Avista Utilities' service territory covers 30,000 square miles with a population of 1.5 million. Certain of our generating facilities are located in Montana, and we supply electricity to a small number of customers in Montana, most of whom are employees who operate one of such facilities. See “Item 2. Properties” for further information on our utility assets. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Economic Conditions and Utility Load Growth” for information on economic conditions in our service territory.
Electric Operations
In addition to providing electric distribution and transmission services, Avista Utilities generates electricity from facilities that we own and we purchase capacity, energy and fuel for generation under long-term and short-term contracts. We also sell electric capacity and energy, as well as surplus fuel in the wholesale market in connection with our resource optimization activities as described below.
As part of Avista Utilities' resource procurement and management operations in the electric business, we engage in an ongoing process of resource optimization, which involves the economic selection from available energy resources to serve our load obligations and the use of these resources to capture available economic value. We transact business in the wholesale markets by selling and purchasing electric capacity and energy, fuel for electric generation, and derivative instruments related to capacity, energy, transport and fuel. Such transactions are part of the process of matching resources with our load obligations and hedging the related financial risks. These transactions range from terms of intra-hour up to multiple years. We make continuing projections of:
| |
• | electric loads at various points in time (ranging from intra-hour to multiple years) based on, among other things, estimates of customer usage and weather, historical data and contract terms, and |
| |
• | resource availability at these points in time based on, among other things, fuel choices and fuel markets, estimates of streamflows, availability of generating units, historic and forward market information, contract terms, and experience. |
On the basis of these projections, we make purchases and sales of electric capacity and energy, fuel for electric generation, and related derivative instruments to match expected resources to expected electric load requirements and reduce our exposure to electricity (or fuel) market price changes. Resource optimization involves generating plant dispatch and scheduling available resources and also includes transactions such as:
| |
• | purchasing fuel for generation, |
| |
• | when economical, selling fuel and substituting wholesale electric purchases, and |
| |
• | other wholesale transactions to capture the value of generation and transmission resources and fuel delivery (transport) capacity contracts. |
This optimization process includes entering into hedging transactions to manage risks. Transactions include both physical energy contracts and related derivative instruments.
Avista Utilities' generation assets are interconnected through the regional transmission system and are operated on a coordinated basis to enhance load-serving capability and reliability. We provide transmission and ancillary services in eastern Washington, northern Idaho and western Montana. Transmission revenues were $15.8 million in 2014, $26.5 million in 2013 and $12.7 million in 2012. Transmission revenues for 2013 include $11.7 million from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) for past use of our electric transmission system.
Electric Requirements
Avista Utilities' peak electric native load requirement for 2014 occurred on February 6, 2014 at which time our total obligation was 2,223 MW consisting of:
| |
• | native load of 1,715 MW, |
| |
• | long-term wholesale obligations of 221 MW, and |
| |
• | short-term wholesale obligations of 287 MW. |
At that time our maximum resource capacity available was 2,594 MW, which included:
| |
• | company-owned or controlled electric generation of 1,667 MW, |
| |
• | long-term hydroelectric contracts with certain Public Utility Districts (PUDs) of 154 MW, |
| |
• | long-term thermal generation contract with Lancaster Plant of 280 MW, |
| |
• | other long-term wholesale contracts of 191 MW, and |
| |
• | short-term wholesale purchases of 302 MW. |
Electric Resources
Avista Utilities has a diverse electric resource mix of Company-owned and contracted hydroelectric projects, thermal generating facilities, wind generation facilities, and power purchases and exchanges.
At the end of 2014, our Company-owned facilities had a total net capability of 1,844 MW, of which 55 percent was hydroelectric and 45 percent was thermal. See “Item 2. Properties” for detailed information on generating facilities.
Hydroelectric Resources Avista Utilities owns and operates six hydroelectric projects on the Spokane River and two hydroelectric projects on the Clark Fork River. Hydroelectric generation is our lowest cost source per megawatt-hour (MWh) of electricity and the availability of hydroelectric generation has a significant effect on total power supply costs. Under normal streamflow and operating conditions, we estimate that we would be able to meet approximately one-half of our total average electric requirements (both retail and long-term wholesale) with the combination of our hydroelectric generation and long-term hydroelectric purchase contracts with certain PUDs in the state of Washington. Our estimate of normal annual hydroelectric generation for 2015 (including resources purchased under long-term hydroelectric contracts with certain PUDs) is 530 average megawatts (aMW) (or 4.6 million MWhs). Hydroelectric resources provided 573 aMW for 2014, 527 aMW for 2013 and 583 aMW for 2012.
The following table shows Avista Utilities' hydroelectric generation (in thousands of MWhs) during the year ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Noxon Rapids | 1,968 |
| | 1,581 |
| | 1,823 |
|
Cabinet Gorge | 1,194 |
| | 1,042 |
| | 1,199 |
|
Post Falls | 84 |
| | 85 |
| | 83 |
|
Upper Falls | 67 |
| | 68 |
| | 60 |
|
Monroe Street | 103 |
| | 105 |
| | 102 |
|
Nine Mile | 56 |
| | 83 |
| | 106 |
|
Long Lake | 476 |
| | 505 |
| | 513 |
|
Little Falls | 195 |
| | 177 |
| | 202 |
|
Total company-owned hydroelectric generation | 4,143 |
| | 3,646 |
| | 4,088 |
|
Long-term hydroelectric contracts with PUDs | 877 |
| | 970 |
| | 1,022 |
|
Total hydroelectric generation | 5,020 |
| | 4,616 |
| | 5,110 |
|
Normal hydroelectric generation (1) | 4,663 |
| | 4,678 |
| | 4,761 |
|
Percentage of normal | 108 | % | | 99 | % | | 107 | % |
| |
(1) | Normal hydroelectric generation is determined by applying an upstream regulation calculation to median natural water flow information. Natural water flow is the flow of the rivers without the influence of dams, whereas regulated water flow |
takes into account any water flow changes from upstream dams due to releasing or holding back water. The calculation of normal varies annually due to the timing of upstream dam regulation throughout the year.
Thermal Resources Avista Utilities owns the following thermal resources:
| |
• | the combined cycle CT natural gas-fired Coyote Springs 2 Generation Project (Coyote Springs 2) located near Boardman, Oregon, |
| |
• | a 15 percent interest in a twin-unit, coal-fired boiler generating facility, the Colstrip 3 & 4 Generating Project (Colstrip) in southeastern Montana, |
| |
• | a wood waste-fired boiler generating facility known as the Kettle Falls Generating Station (Kettle Falls GS) in northeastern Washington, |
| |
• | a two-unit natural gas-fired CT generating facility, located in northeastern Spokane (Northeast CT), |
| |
• | a two-unit natural gas-fired CT generating facility in northern Idaho (Rathdrum CT), and |
| |
• | two small natural gas-fired generating facilities (Boulder Park and Kettle Falls CT). |
Coyote Springs 2, which is operated by Portland General Electric Company, is supplied with natural gas under both term contracts and spot market purchases, including transportation agreements with bilateral renewal rights.
Colstrip, which is operated by PPL Montana, LLC, is supplied with fuel from adjacent coal reserves under coal supply and transportation agreements in effect through 2019.
The primary fuel for the Kettle Falls GS is wood waste generated as a by-product and delivered by trucks from forest industry operations within 100 miles of the plant. A combination of long-term contracts and spot purchases has provided, and is expected to meet, fuel requirements for the Kettle Falls GS.
The Northeast CT, Rathdrum CT, Boulder Park and Kettle Falls CT generating units are primarily used to meet peaking electric requirements. We also operate these facilities when marginal costs are below prevailing wholesale electric prices. These generating facilities have access to natural gas supplies that are adequate to meet their respective operating needs.
See "Item 2. Properties - Avista Utilities - Generation Properties" for the nameplate rating and present generating capabilities of the above thermal resources.
The following table shows our thermal generation (in thousands of MWhs) during the year ended December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Coyote Springs 2 | 1,495 |
| | 1,796 |
| | 1,142 |
|
Colstrip | 1,464 |
| | 1,227 |
| | 1,499 |
|
Kettle Falls GS | 259 |
| | 294 |
| | 209 |
|
Northeast CT, Rathdrum CT, Boulder Park and Kettle Falls CT | 34 |
| | 66 |
| | 14 |
|
Total company-owned thermal generation | 3,252 |
| | 3,383 |
| | 2,864 |
|
Long-term contract with Lancaster Plant | 1,195 |
| | 1,656 |
| | 1,208 |
|
Total thermal generation | 4,447 |
| | 5,039 |
| | 4,072 |
|
Lancaster Plant Power Purchase Agreement The Lancaster Plant is a 270 MW natural gas-fired combined cycle combustion turbine plant located in Idaho, owned by an unrelated third-party. All of the output from the Lancaster Plant is contracted to us through 2026 under a power purchase agreement (PPA).
Palouse Wind PPA Palouse Wind is a wind generation project developed by Palouse Wind, LLC (Palouse Wind), and located in Whitman County, Washington. In June 2011, we entered into a 30-year PPA with Palouse Wind to acquire all of the power and renewable attributes produced by the project at a fixed price per MWh with a fixed escalation of the price over the term of the agreement. The project has a nameplate capacity of approximately 105 MW and is expected to produce approximately 40 aMW. Deliveries from the project began during the fourth quarter of 2012. Generation from Palouse Wind was 335,291 MWhs in 2014 and 297,027 MWhs in 2013. We have an annual option to purchase the wind project following the 10th anniversary of its December 2012 commercial operation date. The purchase price per the PPA is a fixed price per KW of in-service capacity with a fixed decline in the price per KW over the remaining 20 year term of the agreement.
Other Purchases, Exchanges and Sales In addition to the resources described above, we purchase and sell power under various long-term contracts and we also enter into short-term purchases and sales. Further, pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), as amended, we are required to purchase generation from qualifying facilities. This includes, among other resources, hydroelectric projects, cogeneration projects and wind generation projects at rates approved by the UTC and the IPUC. Existing PURPA contracts expire at various times through 2022.
See “Avista Utilities Operating Statistics – Electric Operations – Electric Energy Resources” for annual quantities of purchased power, wholesale power sales and power from exchanges in 2014, 2013 and 2012. See “Electric Operations” for additional information with respect to the use of wholesale purchases and sales as part of our resource optimization process and also see "Future Resource Needs" for the magnitude of these power purchase and sales contracts in future periods.
Hydroelectric Licensing
Avista Corp. is a licensee under the Federal Power Act (FPA) as administered by the FERC, which includes regulation of hydroelectric generation resources. Excluding the Little Falls Hydroelectric Generating Project, our other seven hydroelectric plants are regulated by the FERC through two project licenses. The licensed projects are subject to the provisions of Part I of the FPA. These provisions include payment for headwater benefits, condemnation of licensed projects upon payment of just compensation, and take-over of such projects after the expiration of the license upon payment of the lesser of “net investment” or “fair value” of the project, in either case, plus severance damages.
Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids are under one 45-year FERC license issued in March 2001. See “Cabinet Gorge Total Dissolved Gas Abatement Plan” in “Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for discussion of dissolved atmospheric gas levels that exceed state of Idaho and federal water quality standards downstream of Cabinet Gorge during periods when we must divert excess river flows over the spillway and our mitigation plans and efforts.
Five of our six hydroelectric projects on the Spokane River (Long Lake, Nine Mile, Upper Falls, Monroe Street, and Post Falls) are under one 50-year FERC license issued in June 2009 and are referred to collectively as the Spokane River Project. The sixth, Little Falls, is operated under separate Congressional authority and is not licensed by the FERC. For further information see “Spokane River Licensing” in “Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
Future Resource Needs
Avista Utilities has operational strategies to provide sufficient resources to meet our energy requirements under a range of operating conditions. These operational strategies consider the amount of energy needed, which varies widely because of the factors that influence demand over intra-hour, hourly, daily, monthly and annual durations. Our average hourly load was 1,062 aMW in 2014, 1,086 aMW in 2013 and 1,075 aMW in 2012. The following is a forecast of our average annual energy requirements and resources for 2015 through 2018:
Forecasted Electric Energy Requirements and Resources
(aMW)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 |
Requirements: | | | | | | | |
System load | 1,068 |
| | 1,074 |
| | 1,084 |
| | 1,091 |
|
Contracts for power sales (1) | 124 |
| | 91 |
| | 51 |
| | 39 |
|
Total requirements | 1,192 |
| | 1,165 |
| | 1,135 |
| | 1,130 |
|
Resources: | | | | | | | |
Company-owned and contract hydro generation (2) | 504 |
| | 474 |
| | 488 |
| | 486 |
|
Company-owned and contract thermal generation (3) | 723 |
| | 700 |
| | 723 |
| | 692 |
|
Other contracts for power purchases | 225 |
| | 191 |
| | 163 |
| | 155 |
|
Total resources | 1,452 |
| | 1,365 |
| | 1,374 |
| | 1,333 |
|
Surplus resources | 260 |
| | 200 |
| | 239 |
| | 203 |
|
Additional available energy (4) | 160 |
| | 172 |
| | 174 |
| | 174 |
|
Total surplus resources | 420 |
| | 372 |
| | 413 |
| | 377 |
|
| |
(1) | The contracts for power sales decrease due to certain contracts expiring in each of these years. We are currently evaluating the future plan for the additional resources made available due to the expiration of these contracts. |
| |
(2) | The forecast assumes near normal hydroelectric generation (decline in 2016 is due to changes in contracts with PUDs). |
| |
(3) | Includes our long-term contract with the owner of the Lancaster Plant. Excludes Boulder Park GS, Kettle Falls CT, Northeast CT, and Rathdrum CT as these are considered peaking facilities and are generally not used to meet our base load requirements. We generally dispatch thermal resources when operating costs are lower than short-term wholesale market prices. The decreases in availability during 2016 and 2018 at these facilities are related to scheduled maintenance at Colstrip. |
| |
(4) | The combined maximum capacity of Boulder Park GS, Kettle Falls CT, Northeast CT and Rathdrum CT is 278 MW, with estimated available energy production as indicated for each year. |
In August 2013, we filed our 2013 Electric Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) with the UTC and the IPUC. The IRP details projected growth in demand for energy and the new resources needed to serve customers over the next 20 years. We regard the IRP as a tool for resource evaluation, rather than an acquisition plan for a particular project.
Highlights of the 2013 IRP include:
| |
• | In our IRP in 2011, we had certain recommendations for new renewable resources. These have been met with a 30-year PPA with Palouse Wind and the Kettle Falls GS being qualified as a renewable energy resource under the Washington state Energy Independence Act. |
| |
• | Load growth is expected to be approximately 1 percent, a decline from the growth of 1.6 percent forecasted in 2011. This delays the need for a new natural gas-fired resource by one year. The decrease in expected load growth is primarily due to energy efficiency programs (using less energy to perform activities) over the next 20 years. See "Item 7. Management Discussion and Analysis – Forecasted Customer and Load Growth and Economic Conditions and Utility Load Growth" for further discussion regarding utility customer growth, load growth, and the general economic conditions in our service territory. |
| |
• | Demand response (temporarily reducing the demand for energy) is included in the Preferred Resource Strategy for the first time and could provide 19 MW of peak energy reduction in the 2022 to 2027 time frame. |
| |
• | 575 MW of additional natural gas-fired generation facilities are required between 2020 and 2033. |
| |
• | Transmission upgrades will be needed to deliver the energy from new generation resources to the distribution lines serving customers. We will continue to participate in regional efforts to expand the region’s transmission system. |
We are required to file an IRP every two years, with the next IRP expected to be filed during the third quarter of 2015. Our resource strategy may change from the 2013 IRP based on market, legislative and regulatory developments.
We are subject to the Washington state Energy Independence Act, which requires us to obtain a portion of our electricity from qualifying renewable resources or through purchase of renewable energy credits and acquiring all cost effective conservation measures. Future generation resource decisions will be impacted by legislation for restrictions on GHG emissions and renewable energy requirements.
See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Environmental Issues and Other Contingencies” for information related to existing laws, as well as potential legislation that could influence our future electric resource mix.
Natural Gas Operations
General Avista Utilities provides natural gas distribution services to retail customers in parts of eastern Washington, northern Idaho, and northeastern and southwestern Oregon.
Market prices for natural gas, like other commodities, can be volatile. Our natural gas procurement strategy is to provide reliable supply to our customers with some level of price certainty. We procure natural gas from various supply basins and over varying time periods. The resulting portfolio is a diversified mix of spot market purchases and forward fixed price purchases, utilizing physical and financial derivative instruments. We also use natural gas storage to support high demand periods and to procure natural gas when prices may be lower. Securing prices throughout the year and even into subsequent years provides a level of price certainty and can mitigate price volatility to customers between years.
Weather is a key component of our natural gas customer load. This load is highly variable and daily natural gas loads can differ significantly from the monthly forecasted load projections. We make continuing projections of our natural gas loads and assess available natural gas resources. On the basis of these projections, we plan and execute a series of transactions to hedge a portion of our customer’s projected natural gas requirements through forward market transactions and derivative instruments. These transactions may extend for multiple years into the future with the highest volumes hedged for the current and most immediate
upcoming natural gas operating year (November through October). We also leave a portion of our natural gas supply requirements unhedged for purchase in the short-term spot markets.
Our purchase of natural gas supply is governed by our procurement plan. This plan is reviewed and modified annually by an internal management group. The updated plan is presented and discussed with staff in all three state jurisdictions. Communication with staff does not constitute pre-approval; however, it provides transparency to our procurement practices and offers the staff and other stakeholders an opportunity to express concerns, ask questions and learn about the factors contributing to the plan’s development and subsequent execution. The plan is then presented to our Risk Management Committee (RMC) for approval. Once approval is received, the plan is implemented and monitored by our gas supply and risk management groups.
The plan’s ongoing progress is also presented to UTC and IPUC staff in semi-annual meetings, and updates are given to the OPUC staff quarterly. Other stakeholders (Public Counsel, Citizen Utility Board) are invited to participate. The RMC is provided with an update on plan results and changes in their monthly meetings. These activities provide transparency for the natural gas supply procurement plan. Any material changes to the plan are documented and communicated to RMC members.
As part of the process of balancing natural gas retail load requirements with resources, we engage in the wholesale purchase and sale of natural gas. We plan for sufficient natural gas delivery capacity to serve our retail customers for a theoretical peak day event. As such, we generally have more pipeline and storage capacity than what is needed during periods other than a peak day. We optimize our natural gas resources by using market opportunities to generate economic value that helps mitigate fixed costs. Wholesale sales are delivered through wholesale market facilities outside of our natural gas distribution system. Natural gas resource optimization activities include, but are not limited to:
| |
• | wholesale market sales of surplus natural gas supplies, |
| |
• | purchases and sales of natural gas to optimize use of pipeline and storage capacity, and |
| |
• | participation in the transportation capacity release market. |
We also provide distribution transportation service to qualified, large commercial and industrial natural gas customers who purchase natural gas through third-party marketers. For these customers, we receive their purchased natural gas from such third-party marketers into our distribution system and redeliver it to the customers’ premise.
Optimization transactions that we engage in throughout the year are included in our annual purchased gas cost adjustment filings with the various commissions and they are subject to review for prudency during this process.
Natural Gas Supply Avista Utilities purchases all of its natural gas in wholesale markets. We are connected to multiple supply basins in the western United States and Canada through firm capacity transportation rights on six different pipeline networks. Access to this diverse portfolio of natural gas resources allows us to make natural gas procurement decisions that benefit our natural gas customers. These interstate pipeline transportation rights provide the capacity to serve approximately 25 percent of peak natural gas customer demands from domestic sources, and 75 percent from Canadian sourced supply. Natural gas prices in the Pacific Northwest are affected by global energy markets, as well as supply and demand factors in other regions of the United States and Canada. Future prices and delivery constraints may cause our resource mix to vary.
Natural Gas Storage Avista Utilities owns a one-third interest in Jackson Prairie, an underground natural gas storage field located near Chehalis, Washington. Jackson Prairie has a total peak day deliverability of 12.0 million therms, with a total working natural gas capacity of 256 million therms. As an owner, our share is one-third of the peak day deliverability and total working capacity. We also contract for additional storage capacity and delivery at Jackson Prairie from Northwest Pipeline for a portion of their one-third share of the storage project.
Natural gas storage enables us to store gas in the summer when prices are traditionally lower and withdraw during higher priced winter months. It is also used as a variable peaking resource during cold weather events.
Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement In 2011 Avista Utilities began implementation of a plan to replace certain vintages of Aldyl A natural gas pipe within our distribution systems in Washington, Idaho, and Oregon. In early 2012, we released our protocol report to each state utility commission describing our Aldyl A natural gas pipe replacement plan, proposing to replace our Aldyl A natural gas pipe across our three state jurisdictions over a 20-year period. Later in 2012, after technical workshops held by the UTC to gather perspectives on pipeline replacement programs, including the need for expedited cost recovery, the UTC required all natural gas utilities operating in Washington to file applicable pipe replacement plans. We filed our pipe replacement plan, which included our Aldyl A protocol report, with the UTC in 2013. Current annual replacement costs are approximately $16 million per year, which we expect to sustain, subject to inflation, over the 20-year period. We expect to receive cost recovery for these capital expenditures from the three jurisdictions over the life of these assets.
Regulatory Issues
General As a public utility, Avista Corp. is subject to regulation by state utility commissions for prices, accounting, the issuance of securities and other matters. The retail electric and natural gas operations are subject to the jurisdiction of the UTC, the IPUC, the OPUC, and the MPSC. Approval of the issuance of securities is not required from the MPSC. We are also subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC for licensing of hydroelectric generation resources, and for electric transmission services and wholesale sales.
Since Avista Corp. is a “holding company,” we are also subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, which imposes certain reporting and other requirements. We, and all of our subsidiaries (whether or not engaged in any energy related business) are required to maintain books, accounts and other records in accordance with the FERC regulations and to make them available to the FERC and the state utility commissions. In addition, upon the request of any state utility commission, or of Avista Corp., the FERC would have the authority to review assignment of costs of non-power goods and administrative services among us and our subsidiaries. The FERC has the authority generally to require that rates subject to its jurisdiction be just and reasonable and in this context would continue to be able to, among other things, review transactions of any affiliated company.
Our rates for retail electric and natural gas services (other than specially negotiated retail rates for industrial or large commercial customers, which are subject to regulatory review and approval) are generally determined on a “cost of service” basis.
Rates are designed to provide an opportunity for us to recover allowable operating expenses and earn a reasonable return on “rate base.” Rate base is generally determined by reference to the original cost (net of accumulated depreciation) of utility plant in service, subject to various adjustments for deferred taxes and other items. Over time, rate base is increased by additions to utility plant in service and reduced by depreciation and retirement of utility plant and write-offs as authorized by the utility commissions. Our operating expenses and rate base are allocated or directly assigned among five regulatory jurisdictions: electric in Washington and Idaho, and natural gas in Washington, Idaho and Oregon. In general, a request for new retail rates in Washington and Idaho is made on the basis of net investment, operating expenses and revenues for a test year that ended prior to the date of the request, plus certain adjustments designed to reflect the expected revenues, expenses and net investment during the period new retail rates will be in effect. The retail rates approved by the state commissions in a rate proceeding may not provide sufficient revenues to provide recovery of costs and a reasonable return on investment for a number of reasons, including but not limited to, unexpected changes in revenues, expenses and investment following the time new retail rates are requested in the rate proceeding, and exclusion of certain costs and investment by the commission from the rate making process. Oregon currently allows the use of a forecasted test year to establish retail rates for the rate year.
Our rates for wholesale electric and natural gas transmission services are based on either “cost of service” principles or market-based rates as set forth by the FERC. See “Notes 1 and 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information about regulation, depreciation and deferred income taxes.
General Rate Cases Avista Utilities regularly reviews the need for electric and natural gas rate changes in each state in which we provide service. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Avista Utilities – Regulatory Matters – General Rate Cases” for information on general rate case activity.
Power Cost Deferrals Avista Utilities defers the recognition in the income statement of certain power supply costs that vary from the level currently recovered from our retail customers as authorized by the UTC and the IPUC. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Avista Utilities – Regulatory Matters – Power Cost Deferrals and Recovery Mechanisms” and “Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for detailed information on power cost deferrals and recovery mechanisms in Washington and Idaho.
Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) Under established regulatory practices in each state, Avista Utilities defers the recognition in the income statement of the natural gas costs that vary from the level currently recovered from our retail customers as authorized by each of our jurisdictions. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Avista Utilities – Regulatory Matters – Purchased Gas Adjustments” and “Note 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for detailed information on natural gas cost deferrals and recovery mechanisms in Washington, Idaho and Oregon.
Federal Laws Related to Wholesale Competition
Federal law promotes practices that open the electric wholesale energy market to competition. The FERC requires electric utilities to transmit power and energy to or for wholesale purchasers and sellers, and requires electric utilities to enhance or construct transmission facilities to create additional transmission capacity for the purpose of providing these services. Public
utilities (through subsidiaries or affiliates) and other entities may participate in the development of independent electric generating plants for sales to wholesale customers.
Public utilities operating under the FPA are required to provide open and non-discriminatory access to their transmission systems to third parties and establish an Open Access Same-Time Information System to provide an electronic means by which transmission customers can obtain information about available transmission capacity and purchase transmission access. The FERC also requires each public utility subject to the rules to operate its transmission and wholesale power merchant operating functions separately and to comply with standards of conduct designed to ensure that all wholesale users, including the public utility’s power merchant operations, have equal access to the public utility’s transmission system. Our compliance with these standards has not had any substantive impact on the operation, maintenance and marketing of our transmission system or our ability to provide service to customers.
See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Competition” for further information.
Regional Transmission Organizations
Beginning with FERC Order No. 888 and continuing with subsequent rulemakings and policies, the FERC has encouraged better coordination and operational consistency aimed to capture efficiencies that might otherwise be gained through the formation of a Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) or an independent system operator (ISO).
Avista Utilities meets its FERC requirements to coordinate transmission planning activities with other regional entities through ColumbiaGrid. ColumbiaGrid is a Washington nonprofit membership corporation with an independent board formed to improve the operational efficiency, reliability, and planned expansion of the transmission grid in the Pacific Northwest. We became a member of ColumbiaGrid in 2006 during its formation. ColumbiaGrid is not an ISO, but performs only those functions that its members request, as set forth in specific agreements. Currently, ColumbiaGrid fills the role of facilitating our regional transmission planning as required in Order No. 1000 and other clarifying Orders. ColumbiaGrid and its members also work with other western organizations to address transmission planning, including WestConnect and the Northern Tier Transmission Group (NTTG). In 2011, we became a registered Planning Participant of the NTTG. We will continue to assess the benefits of entering into other functional agreements with ColumbiaGrid and/or participating in other forums to attain operational efficiencies and to meet FERC policy objectives.
Reliability Standards
Among its other provisions, the U.S. Energy Policy Act provides for the implementation of mandatory reliability standards and authorizes the FERC to assess penalties for non-compliance with these standards and other FERC regulations.
The FERC certified the NERC as the single Electric Reliability Organization authorized to establish and enforce reliability standards and delegate authority to regional entities for the purpose of establishing and enforcing reliability standards. The FERC has approved the NERC Reliability Standards, including western region standards, making up the set of legally enforceable standards for the United States bulk electric system. The first of these reliability standards became effective in June 2007. We are required to self-certify our compliance with these standards on an annual basis and undergo regularly scheduled periodic reviews by the NERC and its regional entity, the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC). Our failure to comply with these standards could result in financial penalties of up to $1 million per day per violation. Annual self-certification and audit processes to date have demonstrated our substantial compliance with these standards. Requirements relating to cyber security are continually evolving. Our compliance with version 5 of the NERC's Critical Infrastructure Protection standard is driving several physical and electronic security initiatives in our control centers, generating stations and substations. We do not expect the costs of the physical and electronic securities initiatives to have a material impact to our financial results.
AVISTA UTILITIES ELECTRIC OPERATING STATISTICS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
ELECTRIC OPERATIONS | | | | | |
OPERATING REVENUES (Dollars in Thousands): | | | | | |
Residential | $ | 338,697 |
| | $ | 331,867 |
| | $ | 315,137 |
|
Commercial | 300,109 |
| | 289,604 |
| | 286,568 |
|
Industrial | 110,775 |
| | 113,632 |
| | 119,589 |
|
Public street and highway lighting | 7,549 |
| | 7,267 |
| | 7,240 |
|
Total retail | 757,130 |
| | 742,370 |
| | 728,534 |
|
Wholesale | 138,162 |
| | 127,556 |
| | 102,736 |
|
Sales of fuel | 83,732 |
| | 126,657 |
| | 115,835 |
|
Other | 27,467 |
| | 36,071 |
| | 21,067 |
|
Provision for earnings sharing (1) | (7,503 | ) | | (2,048 | ) | | — |
|
Total electric operating revenues | $ | 998,988 |
| | $ | 1,030,606 |
| | $ | 968,172 |
|
ENERGY SALES (Thousands of MWhs): | | | | | |
Residential | 3,694 |
| | 3,745 |
| | 3,608 |
|
Commercial | 3,189 |
| | 3,147 |
| | 3,127 |
|
Industrial | 1,868 |
| | 1,979 |
| | 2,100 |
|
Public street and highway lighting | 25 |
| | 26 |
| | 26 |
|
Total retail | 8,776 |
| | 8,897 |
| | 8,861 |
|
Wholesale | 3,686 |
| | 3,874 |
| | 3,733 |
|
Total electric energy sales | 12,462 |
| | 12,771 |
| | 12,594 |
|
ENERGY RESOURCES (Thousands of MWhs): | | | | | |
Hydro generation (from Company facilities) | 4,143 |
| | 3,646 |
| | 4,088 |
|
Thermal generation (from Company facilities) | 3,252 |
| | 3,383 |
| | 2,864 |
|
Purchased power - hydro generation from long-term contracts with PUDs | 877 |
| | 970 |
| | 1,022 |
|
Purchased power - thermal generation from long-term contract with Lancaster plant | 1,195 |
| | 1,656 |
| | 1,208 |
|
Purchased power - wind generation from long-term contract with Palouse Wind | 335 |
| | 297 |
| | 61 |
|
Purchased power - wholesale | 3,208 |
| | 3,452 |
| | 3,995 |
|
Power exchanges | (25 | ) | | (20 | ) | | (10 | ) |
Total power resources | 12,985 |
| | 13,384 |
| | 13,228 |
|
Energy losses and Company use | (523 | ) | | (613 | ) | | (634 | ) |
Total energy resources (net of losses) | 12,462 |
| | 12,771 |
| | 12,594 |
|
NUMBER OF RETAIL CUSTOMERS (Average for Period): | | | | | |
Residential | 324,188 |
| | 321,098 |
| | 318,692 |
|
Commercial | 40,988 |
| | 40,202 |
| | 39,869 |
|
Industrial | 1,385 |
| | 1,386 |
| | 1,395 |
|
Public street and highway lighting | 531 |
| | 527 |
| | 503 |
|
Total electric retail customers | 367,092 |
| | 363,213 |
| | 360,459 |
|
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE AVERAGES: | | | | | |
Annual use per customer (KWh) | 11,394 |
| | 11,664 |
| | 11,323 |
|
Revenue per KWh (in cents) | 9.17 |
| | 8.86 |
| | 8.73 |
|
Annual revenue per customer | $ | 1,044.76 |
| | $ | 1,033.54 |
| | $ | 988.84 |
|
AVERAGE HOURLY LOAD (aMW) | 1,062 |
| | 1,086 |
| | 1,075 |
|
AVISTA UTILITIES ELECTRIC OPERATING STATISTICS
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCE AVAILABILITY at time of system peak (MW): | | | | | |
Total requirements (winter): | | | | | |
Retail native load | 1,715 |
| | 1,669 |
| | 1,554 |
|
Wholesale obligations | 508 |
| | 554 |
| | 637 |
|
Total requirements (winter) | 2,223 |
| | 2,223 |
| | 2,191 |
|
Total resource availability (winter) | 2,594 |
| | 2,767 |
| | 2,618 |
|
Total requirements (summer): | | | | | |
Retail native load | 1,606 |
| | 1,577 |
| | 1,579 |
|
Wholesale obligations | 691 |
| | 569 |
| | 906 |
|
Total requirements (summer) | 2,297 |
| | 2,146 |
| | 2,485 |
|
Total resource availability (summer) | 2,608 |
| | 2,813 |
| | 3,060 |
|
COOLING DEGREE DAYS: (2) | | | | | |
Spokane, WA | | | | | |
Actual | 631 |
| | 709 |
| | 535 |
|
30-year average (4) | 394 |
| | 394 |
| | 434 |
|
% of average | 160 | % | | 180 | % | | 123 | % |
HEATING DEGREE DAYS: (3) | | | | | |
Spokane, WA | | | | | |
Actual | 6,215 |
| | 6,683 |
| | 6,256 |
|
30-year average (4) | 6,820 |
| | 6,780 |
| | 6,676 |
|
% of average | 91 | % | | 99 | % | | 94 | % |
| |
(1) | This provision for earnings sharing is specifically related to the Idaho general rate case which was settled in March 2013. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Idaho General Rate Cases" for further discussion of this provision. |
| |
(2) | Cooling degree days are the measure of the warmness of weather experienced, based on the extent to which the average of high and low temperatures for a day exceeds 65 degrees Fahrenheit (annual degree days above historic indicate warmer than average temperatures). |
| |
(3) | Heating degree days are the measure of the coldness of weather experienced, based on the extent to which the average of high and low temperatures for a day falls below 65 degrees Fahrenheit (annual degree days below historic indicate warmer than average temperatures). |
| |
(4) | The 30-year average heating and cooling degree days fluctuated in 2013 due to a change in our methodology for calculating the amount. In 2013, we have switched to a rolling 30-year average whereas in prior years we only received updated 30-year average data on a periodic basis. |
AVISTA UTILITIES NATURAL GAS OPERATING STATISTICS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
NATURAL GAS OPERATIONS | | | | | |
OPERATING REVENUES (Dollars in Thousands): | | | | | |
Residential | $ | 203,373 |
| | $ | 206,330 |
| | $ | 196,719 |
|
Commercial | 103,179 |
| | 102,225 |
| | 98,994 |
|
Interruptible | 2,792 |
| | 2,681 |
| | 2,232 |
|
Industrial | 4,158 |
| | 3,599 |
| | 3,635 |
|
Total retail | 313,502 |
| | 314,835 |
| | 301,580 |
|
Wholesale | 228,187 |
| | 194,717 |
| | 158,631 |
|
Transportation | 7,735 |
| | 7,576 |
| | 7,032 |
|
Other | 7,461 |
| | 8,573 |
| | 6,930 |
|
Provision for earnings sharing (1) | (221 | ) | | (442 | ) | | — |
|
Total natural gas operating revenues | $ | 556,664 |
| | $ | 525,259 |
| | $ | 474,173 |
|
THERMS DELIVERED (Thousands of Therms): | | | | | |
Residential | 190,171 |
| | 204,711 |
| | 189,152 |
|
Commercial | 116,748 |
| | 122,245 |
| | 115,083 |
|
Interruptible | 5,033 |
| | 5,694 |
| | 4,363 |
|
Industrial | 5,648 |
| | 5,181 |
| | 5,073 |
|
Total retail | 317,600 |
| | 337,831 |
| | 313,671 |
|
Wholesale | 545,620 |
| | 524,818 |
| | 586,193 |
|
Transportation | 162,311 |
| | 159,976 |
| | 154,704 |
|
Interdepartmental and Company use | 411 |
| | 418 |
| | 381 |
|
Total therms delivered | 1,025,942 |
| | 1,023,043 |
| | 1,054,949 |
|
SOURCES OF NATURAL GAS DELIVERED (Thousands of Therms): | | | | | |
Purchases | 902,040 |
| | 834,068 |
| | 919,684 |
|
Storage - injections | (99,550 | ) | | (97,338 | ) | | (105,904 | ) |
Storage - withdrawals | 68,722 |
| | 129,006 |
| | 93,850 |
|
Natural gas for transportation | 162,311 |
| | 159,976 |
| | 154,704 |
|
Distribution system losses | (7,581 | ) | | (2,669 | ) | | (7,385 | ) |
Total natural gas delivered | 1,025,942 |
| | 1,023,043 |
| | 1,054,949 |
|
NUMBER OF RETAIL CUSTOMERS (Average for Period): | | | | | |
Residential | 291,928 |
| | 288,708 |
| | 286,522 |
|
Commercial | 34,047 |
| | 33,932 |
| | 33,763 |
|
Interruptible | 37 |
| | 38 |
| | 38 |
|
Industrial | 264 |
| | 259 |
| | 263 |
|
Total natural gas retail customers | 326,276 |
| | 322,937 |
| | 320,586 |
|
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE AVERAGES: | | | | | |
Annual use per customer (therms) | 651 |
| | 709 |
| | 660 |
|
Revenue per therm (in dollars) | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
|
Annual revenue per customer | $ | 696.66 |
| | $ | 714.67 |
| | $ | 686.57 |
|
AVISTA UTILITIES NATURAL GAS OPERATING STATISTICS
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
HEATING DEGREE DAYS: (2) | | | | | |
Spokane, WA | | | | | |
Actual | 6,215 |
| | 6,683 |
| | 6,256 |
|
30-year average (3) | 6,820 |
| | 6,780 |
| | 6,676 |
|
% of average | 91 | % | | 99 | % | | 94 | % |
Medford, OR | | | | | |
Actual | 3,382 |
| | 4,576 |
| | 4,182 |
|
30-year average (3) | 4,539 |
| | 4,539 |
| | 4,422 |
|
% of average | 75 | % | | 101 | % | | 95 | % |
| |
(1) | This provision for earnings sharing is specifically related to the Idaho general rate case which was settled in March 2013. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - Idaho General Rate Cases" for further discussion of this provision. |
| |
(2) | Heating degree days are the measure of the coldness of weather experienced, based on the extent to which the average of high and low temperatures for a day falls below 65 degrees Fahrenheit (annual degree days below historic indicate warmer than average temperatures). |
| |
(3) | The 30-year average heating degree days fluctuated in 2013 due to a change in our methodology for calculating the amount. In 2013, we have switched to a rolling 30-year average whereas in prior years we only received updated 30-year average data on a periodic basis. |
ALASKA ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
AEL&P is the primary operating subsidiary of AERC. AEL&P is the sole utility providing electrical energy in the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska. Juneau is a geographically isolated community with no electric interconnections with the transmission facilities of other utilities and no pipeline access to natural gas or other fuels. Juneau’s economy is primarily driven by government activities, tourism, commercial fishing, and mining, as well as activities as the commercial hub of southeast Alaska.
AEL&P owns and operates electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities located in Juneau. AEL&P operates five hydroelectric generation facilities with 102.7 MW of hydroelectric generation capacity as of December 31, 2014. AEL&P owns four of these generation facilities (totaling 24.7 MW of capacity) and has a power purchase commitment for the output of the Snettisham hydroelectric project (totaling 78 MW of capacity). The Snettisham power purchase agreement is accounted for as a capital lease.
The Snettisham hydroelectric project is AEL&P’s primary generation facility and the main power source for Juneau, supplying approximately two-thirds of the area’s electricity. The Snettisham hydroelectric project was constructed and operated by the federal government and subsequently purchased by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA). AEL&P has a long-term power purchase agreement and operating and maintenance agreement with the AIDEA to operate and maintain the facility. This power purchase agreement is a take-or-pay obligation expiring in December 2038, to purchase all the output of the 78 MW Snettisham hydroelectric project. AIDEA issued $100.0 million in revenue bonds (of which $70.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2014), to finance its acquisition of the project and the payments by AEL&P are designed to be more than sufficient to enable the AIDEA to pay the principal of and interest on its revenue bonds, maturing in January 2034. The payments by AEL&P under the agreement are unconditional, notwithstanding any suspension, reduction or curtailment of the operation of the project. For accounting purposes, this power purchase agreement is treated as a capital lease and as of December 31, 2014, the capital lease obligation was $70.0 million. Snettisham Electric Company, a non-operating subsidiary of AERC, has the option to purchase the Snettisham project at any time for the principal amount of the bonds outstanding at that time. See "Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further discussion of the Snettisham capital lease obligation.
As of December 31, 2014, AEL&P also had 93.9 MW of diesel generating capacity from three facilities to provide back-up service to firm customers when necessary.
The following table shows AEL&P's hydroelectric generation (in thousands of MWhs) during the time periods indicated below:
|
| | | | | |
| Second half of | | Full 12 months of |
| 2014 | | 2014 |
Snettisham | 119 |
| | 276 |
|
Lake Dorothy | 54 |
| | 85 |
|
Salmon Creek | 16 |
| | 25 |
|
Annex Creek | 14 |
| | 28 |
|
Gold Creek | 4 |
| | 6 |
|
Total hydroelectric generation | 207 |
| | 420 |
|
Normal hydroelectric generation | 211 |
| | 430 |
|
Percentage of normal | 98 | % | | 98 | % |
Only the hydroelectric generation for the second half of 2014 in the table above was included in Avista Corp.'s overall results for 2014. The full 12 months of 2014 in the table above is presented for information purposes only.
As of December 31, 2014, AEL&P served 16,394 customers. AEL&P’s customer classes include residential, small commercial, large commercial, governmental and street lighting customer classes. Its primary customers include city, state and federal governmental entities located in Juneau, as well as a mine located in the Juneau area. Most of AEL&P’s customers are served on a firm basis while certain of its customers, including its largest customer, are served on an interruptible sales basis. AEL&P maintains separate rate tariffs for each of its customer classes, as well as separate seasonal rates.
As of December 31, 2014, AEL&P had 59 full-time employees and employs approximately 15-18 temporary, seasonal employees each year. Approximately half of AEL&P’s full-time employees are members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) and subject to a collective bargaining agreement.
AEL&P’s operations are subject to regulation by the RCA with respect to rates, standard of service, facilities, accounting and certain other matters, but not with respect to the issuance of securities. Rate adjustments for AEL&P’s customers require approval by the RCA pursuant to RCA regulations. AEL&P's last general rate case was filed in 2010 and approved by the RCA in 2011. The RCA approved a capital structure including 53.8 percent equity and an authorized return on equity of 12.875 percent. We expect that AEL&P will maintain a similar capital structure going forward.
AEL&P is also subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC concerning the permits and licenses necessary to operate certain of its hydroelectric facilities. One of these licenses (for the Salmon Creek and Annex Creek hydroelectric projects) expires in 2018. Since AEL&P has no electric interconnection with other utilities and makes no wholesale sales, it is not subject to general FERC jurisdiction.
The Snettisham hydroelectric project is subject to regulation by the State of Alaska with respect to dam safety and certain aspects of its operations. In addition, AEL&P is subject to regulation with respect to air and water quality, land use and other environmental matters under both federal and state laws.
OTHER BUSINESSES
The following table shows our assets related to our other businesses as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
Spokane Energy | | $ | 30,404 |
| | $ | 42,829 |
|
Avista Energy | | — |
| | 12,399 |
|
METALfx | | 12,065 |
| | 11,105 |
|
Steam Plant and Courtyard Office Center | | 7,278 |
| | 7,055 |
|
Alaska companies (AERC and AJT Mining) | | 7,507 |
| | — |
|
Avista Capital - standalone | | 13,221 |
| | 420 |
|
Other | | 9,735 |
| | 7,474 |
|
Total | | $ | 80,210 |
| | $ | 81,282 |
|
Spokane Energy is a special purpose limited liability company and all of its membership capital is owned by Avista Corp. Spokane Energy was formed in December 1998, to assume ownership of a fixed rate electric capacity contract between Avista Corp. and Portland General Electric Company. Of the total assets for Spokane Energy, the fixed rate electricity capacity contract represents $28.2 million and $40.6 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively, and the likelihood of this asset being at risk of impairment is remote. In addition to the assets above, Spokane Energy has nonrecourse long-term debt outstanding in the amount of $1.4 million and $17.8 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to the acquisition of the fixed rate electric capacity contract. The final payment was made in January 2015.
Avista Energy is a former electricity and natural gas marketing, trading and resource management business, which is a subsidiary of Avista Capital. This subsidiary has not been active since 2009; however, it continues to incur legal fees as it defends its actions related to legal proceedings in the Pacific Northwest Refund Proceeding. During 2014, Avista Energy finalized a settlement agreement in its other legal proceedings including the FERC Inquiry, the California Refund Proceeding and the California Attorney General Complaint (the “Lockyer Complaint”). See "Note 20 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements" for further detail regarding these legal proceedings. The assets associated with Avista Energy as of December 31, 2013 were deferred tax assets related to its former operations.
AM&D doing business as METALfx performs custom sheet metal fabrication of electronic enclosures, parts and systems for the computer, construction, telecom, renewable energy and medical industries.
Steam Plant and Courtyard Office Center consist of real estate investments (primarily mixed use commercial and retail office space).
As of July 1, 2014 we own AERC and AJT Mining, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AERC and is an inactive mining company holding certain properties.
The assets at Avista Capital - standalone as of December 31, 2014 primarily consist of the escrow receivables related to the sale of Ecova on June 30, 2014. See "Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for further detail regarding this transaction.
Our other investments and operations include emerging technology venture capital funds.
Over time as opportunities arise, we dispose of investments and phase out operations that do not fit with our overall corporate strategy. However, we may invest incremental funds to protect our existing investments and invest in new businesses that we believe fit with our overall corporate strategy.
We are focused on discovering new ways to accelerate growth for Avista Corp. within our core utility business and related businesses and are planning to incur $2.0 million to $3.0 million per year exploring opportunities to develop new markets and ways for customers to improve the use of electricity and natural gas for commercial productivity and transportation. We may also make other targeted investments that will help us gain strategic insights to build new growth platforms.
In particular, Salix LNG is exploring markets that could be served with liquefied natural gas, primarily in western North America. These markets include power generation, marine bunkering and transportation fuels.
Also, our acquisition of AERC provides us a platform to explore strategic opportunities to bring natural gas to Southeast Alaska.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
RISK FACTORS
The following factors could have a significant impact on our operations, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. These factors could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including this Annual Report on Form 10-K), and elsewhere. Please also see “Forward-Looking Statements” for additional factors which could have a significant impact on our operations, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows and could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Weather (temperatures, precipitation levels and storms) has a significant effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Weather impacts are described in the following subtopics:
| |
• | certain retail electricity and natural gas sales, |
| |
• | the cost of natural gas supply, |
| |
• | the cost of power supply, and |
Certain retail electricity and natural gas sales volumes vary directly with changes in temperatures. We normally have our highest retail (electric and natural gas) energy sales during the winter heating season in the first and fourth quarters of the year. We also have high electricity demand for air conditioning during the summer (third quarter) in the Pacific Northwest. In general, warmer weather in the heating season and cooler weather in the cooling season will reduce our customers’ energy demand and retail operating revenues.
The cost of natural gas supply tends to increase with higher demand during periods of cold weather. Increased costs adversely affect cash flows when we purchase natural gas for retail supply at prices above the amount then allowed for recovery in retail rates. We defer differences between actual natural gas supply costs and the amount currently recovered in retail rates and we are generally allowed to recover substantially all of these differences after regulatory review. However, these deferred costs require cash outflows from the time of natural gas purchases until the costs are later recovered through retail sales. Inter-regional natural gas pipelines and competition for supply can allow demand-driven price volatility in other regions of North America to affect prices in our region, even though there may be less extreme weather conditions in our area.
The cost of power supply can be significantly affected by weather. Precipitation (consisting of snowpack, its water content and melting pattern plus rainfall) and other streamflow conditions (such as regional water storage operations) significantly affect hydroelectric generation capability. Variations in hydroelectric generation inversely affect our reliance on market purchases and thermal generation. To the extent that hydroelectric generation is less than normal, significantly more costly power supply resources must be acquired and the ability to realize net benefits from surplus hydroelectric wholesale sales is reduced. Wholesale prices also vary based on wind patterns as wind generation capacity is material in our region but its contribution to supply is inconsistent.
The price of power in the wholesale energy markets tends to be higher during periods of high regional demand, such as occurs with temperature extremes. We may need to purchase power in the wholesale market during peak price periods. The price of natural gas as fuel for natural gas-fired electric generation also tends to increase during periods of high demand which are often related to temperature extremes. We may need to purchase natural gas fuel in these periods of high prices to meet electric demands. The cost of power supply during peak usage periods may be higher than the retail sales price or the amount allowed in retail rates by our regulators. To the extent that power supply costs are above the amount allowed currently in retail rates, the difference is partially absorbed by the Company in current expense and it is partially deferred or shared with customers through regulatory mechanisms.
The price of power tends to be lower during periods with excess supply, such as the spring when hydroelectric conditions are usually at their maximum and various facilities are required to operate to meet environmental mandates. Oversupply can be exacerbated when intermittent resources such as wind generation are producing output that may be supported by price subsidies. In extreme situations, we may be required to sell excess energy at negative prices.
As a result of these combined factors, our net cost of power supply – the difference between our costs of generation and market purchases, reduced by our revenue from wholesale sales – varies significantly because of weather.
Damage to facilities may be caused by severe weather, such as snow, ice, wind storms or avalanches. The cost to implement rapid or any repair to such facilities can be significant. Overhead electric lines are most susceptible to damage caused by severe weather.
Regulators may not grant rates that provide timely or sufficient recovery of our costs or allow a reasonable rate of return for our shareholders.
We have experienced higher costs for utility operations in each of the last several years with the exception of 2013 which saw a slight decrease from 2012 actual costs. We have also made significant capital investments into utility plant assets. Our ability to recover these costs depends on the amount and timeliness of retail rate changes allowed by regulatory agencies. We expect to periodically file for rate increases with regulatory agencies to recover our costs and provide an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return for shareholders. If regulators grant substantially lower rate increases than our requests in the future or if deferred costs are disallowed, it could have a negative effect on our operating revenues, net income and cash flows.
Energy commodity price changes affect our cash flows and results of operations.
Energy commodity prices can be volatile. A combination of factors exposes our operations to commodity price risks. We rely on energy markets and other counterparties for energy supply, surplus and optimization transactions and commodity price hedging. These factors include:
| |
• | Our obligation to serve our retail customers at rates set through the regulatory process. We cannot change retail rates to reflect current energy prices unless and until we receive regulatory approval. |
| |
• | Customer demand, which is beyond our control because of weather, customer choices, prevailing economic conditions and other factors. |
| |
• | Some of our energy supply cost is fixed by the nature of the energy-producing assets or through contractual arrangements. However, a significant portion of our energy resource costs are not fixed. |
Because we must supply the amount of energy demanded by our customers and we must sell it at fixed rates and only a portion of our energy supply costs are fixed, we are subject to the risk of buying energy at higher prices in wholesale energy markets (and the risk of selling energy at lower prices if we are in a surplus position). Electricity and natural gas in wholesale markets are commodities with historically high price volatility. Changes in wholesale energy prices affect, among other things, the cash requirements to purchase electricity and natural gas for retail customers or wholesale obligations and the market value of derivative assets and liabilities.
When we enter into fixed price energy commodity transactions for future delivery, we are subject to credit terms that may require us to provide collateral to wholesale counterparties related to the difference between current prices and the agreed upon fixed prices. These collateral requirements can place significant demands on our cash flows or borrowing arrangements. Price volatility can cause collateral requirements to change quickly and significantly.
Cash flow deferrals related to energy commodities can be significant. We are permitted to collect from customers only amounts approved by regulatory commissions. However, our costs to provide energy service can be much higher or lower than the amounts currently billed to customers. We are permitted to defer most of this difference for review by the regulatory commissions who have discretion as to the extent and timing of future recovery or refund to customers.
Power and natural gas costs higher than those recovered in retail rates reduce cash flows. Amounts that are not allowed for deferral or which are not approved to become part of customer rates affect our results of operations.
We defer income statement recognition and recovery from customers of certain power and natural gas costs that are higher or lower than what are currently authorized in retail rates by regulators. These power and natural gas costs are recorded as deferred charges with the opportunity for future recovery through retail rates. These deferred costs are subject to review for prudence and potential disallowance by regulators.
Despite the opportunity to recover deferred power and natural gas costs, our operating cash flows can be negatively affected until these costs are recovered from customers.
Our energy resource risk management processes can cause volatility in our cash flows and results of operations. We engage in active hedging and resource optimization practices to reduce energy cost volatility and economic exposure related to commodity price fluctuations. We routinely enter into contracts to hedge a portion of our purchase and sale commitments for electricity and natural gas, as well as forecasted excess or deficit energy positions and inventories of natural gas. We use physical energy contracts and derivative instruments, such as forwards, futures, swaps and options traded in the over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. We cannot and do not attempt to fully hedge our energy resource assets or our forecasted net positions for various time horizons. To the extent we have positions that are not hedged, or if hedging positions do not fully match the corresponding purchase or sale, fluctuating commodity prices could have a material effect on our operating revenues, resource costs, derivative assets and liabilities, and operating cash flows. In addition, actual loads and resources typically vary from forecasts, sometimes to a significant degree, which require additional transactions or dispatch decisions that impact cash flows.
The hedges we enter into are reviewed for prudence by the various regulators and any deferred costs (including those as a result of our hedging transactions) are subject to review for prudence and potential disallowance by regulators.
We rely on regular access to financial markets but we cannot assure favorable or reasonable financing terms will be available when we need them.
Access to capital markets is critical to our operations and our capital structure. We have significant capital requirements that we expect to fund, in part, by accessing capital markets. As such, the state of financial markets and credit availability in the global, United States and regional economies impacts our financial condition. We could experience increased borrowing costs or limited access to capital on reasonable terms.
We access long-term capital markets to finance capital expenditures, repay maturing long-term debt and obtain additional working capital from time to time. Our ability to access capital on reasonable terms is subject to numerous factors and market conditions, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to obtain capital on reasonable terms, it may limit or prohibit our ability to finance capital expenditures and repay maturing long-term debt. Our liquidity needs could exceed our short-term credit availability and lead to defaults on various financing arrangements. We would also likely be prohibited from paying dividends on our common stock.
Performance of the financial markets could also result in significant declines in the market values of assets held by our pension plan and/or a significant increase in the pension liability (which impacts the funded status of the plan) and could increase future funding obligations and pension expense.
We rely on credit from financial institutions for short-term borrowings. We need adequate levels of credit with financial institutions for short-term liquidity. We have a $400.0 million committed line of credit that is scheduled to expire in April 2019. Our subsidiary AEL&P has a committed line of credit in the amount of $25.0 million with an expiration date of November 2019. There is no assurance that we will have access to credit beyond these expiration dates. The committed line of credit agreements contain customary covenants and default provisions. In the event of default, it would be difficult for us to obtain financing on reasonable terms to pay creditors or fund operations. We would also likely be prohibited from paying dividends on our common stock.
We hedge a portion of our interest rate risk with financial derivative instruments, which may include interest rate swaps and U.S. Treasury lock agreements. We increased the use of interest rate swaps in 2013 and 2014. If market interest rates decrease below the interest rates we have locked in, this will result in a liability related to our interest rate swap agreements, which can be significant. As of December 31, 2014, we had a net interest rate derivative liability of $76.6 million, which increased significantly in 2014 due to declining long-term interest rates. We did not have any U.S. Treasury lock agreements outstanding as of December 31, 2014. We may be required to post cash or letters of credit as collateral depending on fluctuations in the fair value of the derivative instruments. Settlement of interest rate derivative instruments in a liability position could require a significant amount of cash, which could negatively impact our liquidity and short-term credit availability and increase interest expense over the term of the associated debt.
Downgrades in our credit ratings could impede our ability to obtain financing, adversely affect the terms of financing and impact our ability to transact for or hedge energy resources. If we do not maintain our investment grade credit rating with the major credit rating agencies, we could expect increased debt service costs, limitations on our ability to access capital markets or obtain other financing on reasonable terms, and requirements to provide collateral (in the form of cash or letters of credit) to lenders and counterparties. In addition, credit rating downgrades could reduce the number of counterparties willing to do business with us.
We are subject to various operational and event risks.
Our operations are subject to operational and event risks that include:
| |
• | blackouts or disruptions to distribution, transmission or transportation systems, |
| |
• | unplanned outages at generating plants, |
| |
• | fuel cost and availability, including delivery constraints, |
| |
• | explosions, fires, accidents, or mechanical breakdowns that may occur while operating and maintaining our generation, transmission and distribution systems, and |
| |
• | natural disasters that can disrupt energy generation, transmission and distribution and general business operations. |
Disasters may affect the general economy, financial and capital markets, specific industries, or our ability to conduct business. As protection against operational and event risks, we maintain business continuity and disaster recovery plans, maintain insurance coverage against some, but not all, potential losses and we seek to negotiate indemnification arrangements with
contractors for certain event risks. However, insurance or indemnification agreements may not be adequate to protect us against liability, extra expenses and operating disruptions from all of the operational and event risks described above. In addition, we are subject to the risk that insurers and/or other parties will dispute or be unable to perform on their obligations to us.
Cyber attacks, terrorism or other malicious acts could disrupt our businesses and have a negative impact on our results of operations and cash flows.
In the course of our operations, we rely on interconnected technology systems for operation of our generating plants, electric transmission and distribution systems, natural gas distribution systems, customer billing and customer service, accounting and other administrative processes and compliance with various regulations.
There are various risks associated with technology systems such as hardware or software failure, communications failure, data distortion or destruction, unauthorized access to data, misuse of proprietary or confidential data, unauthorized control through electronic means, programming mistakes and other deliberate or inadvertent human errors. In particular, cyber attacks, terrorism or other malicious acts could damage, destroy or disrupt these systems. Additionally, the facilities and systems of clients, suppliers and third party service providers could be vulnerable to these same risks and, to the extent of interconnection to our technology, may impact us. Any failure, unexpected, or unauthorized unavailability of technology systems could result in a loss of operating revenues, an increase in operating expenses and costs to repair or replace damaged assets. Any of the above could also result in the loss or release of confidential customer information or other proprietary data that could adversely affect our reputation, competitiveness, and result in costly litigation and impact on our results of operations. As these potential cyber attacks become more common and sophisticated, we could be required to incur costs to strengthen our systems and respond to emerging concerns.
Terrorist attacks could also be directed at physical electric and natural gas facilities, as well as technology systems.
There have been numerous recent changes in legislation, related administrative rulemakings, and Executive Orders, including periodic audits of compliance with such rules, which may adversely affect our operational and financial performance.
We expect to continue to be affected by legislation at the national, state and local level, as well as by administrative rules and requirements published by government agencies, including but not limited to the FERC, the EPA and state regulators. We are also subject to NERC and WECC reliability standards. The FERC, the NERC and the WECC may perform periodic audits of the Company. Failure to comply with the FERC, the NERC, or the WECC requirements can result in financial penalties of up to $1 million per day per violation.
Future legislation or administrative rules could have a material adverse effect on our operations, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Actions or limitations to address concerns over the long-term global and our utilities' service area climate changes may affect our operations and financial performance.
Legislative developments and advocacy at the state, national and international levels concerning climate change and other environmental issues could have significant impacts on our operations. The electric utility industry is one of the largest and most immediate industries to be more heavily regulated in some proposals. For example, various legislative proposals have been made to limit or place further restrictions on byproducts of combustion, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, carbon dioxide, and other greenhouse gases and mercury emissions. Such proposals, if adopted, could restrict the operation and raise the cost of our power generation resources.
We expect continuing activity in the future and we are evaluating the extent that potential changes to environmental laws and regulations may:
| |
• | increase the operating costs of generating plants, |
| |
• | increase the lead time and capital costs for the construction of new generating plants, |
| |
• | require modification of our existing generating plants, |
| |
• | require existing generating plant operations to be curtailed or shut down, |
| |
• | reduce the amount of energy available from our generating plants, |
| |
• | restrict the types of generating plants that can be built or contracted with, and |
| |
• | require construction of specific types of generation plants at higher cost. |
We have contingent liabilities, including certain matters related to potential environmental liabilities, and cannot predict the outcome of these matters.
In the normal course of our business, we have matters that are the subject of ongoing litigation, mediation, investigation and/or negotiation. We cannot predict the ultimate outcome or potential impact of any particular issue, including the extent, if any, of insurance coverage or that amounts payable by us may be recoverable through the ratemaking process. We are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state and local authorities related to our past, present and future operations. See “Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for further details of these matters.
We may be adversely affected by our inability to successfully implement certain technology projects.
In February 2015 we implemented new customer information and work management systems. Our customer information and work management systems are two of our most critical technology systems and are interconnected to many other systems in our company. These implementations have resulted in certain changes to business processes and internal controls. There are inherent risks associated with replacing and changing these types of systems, such as delayed and / or inaccurate customer bills, potential disruption of our business, substantial unplanned costs and the potential lack of recovery through rates which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Our acquisition of AERC may not achieve its intended results.
On July 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of AERC, and its subsidiary, AEL&P, the sole provider of electric services to 16,394 customers in Juneau, Alaska. Achieving the anticipated earnings contribution from AERC is subject to numerous uncertainties, including market conditions and risks related to AERC's business. This transaction could result in increased costs, decreases in the expected revenues from AERC, the impairment of goodwill or other assets, and diversion of management time and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
A majority of AEL&P’s hydroelectric power generation is provided by a single facility that is subject to a long-term power purchase agreement and operating and maintenance agreement in connection with which AEL&P is required to make certain payments.
While AEL&P operates several hydroelectric power generation facilities and has diesel generating capacity from multiple facilities to provide backup service to firm customers when necessary, a single hydroelectric power generation facility, the Snettisham hydroelectric project, provides approximately two-thirds of AEL&P’s hydroelectric power generation. Any issues that negatively affect the Snettisham hydroelectric project’s ability to generate or transmit power, any decrease in the demand for the power generated by the Snettisham hydroelectric project or any loss by AERC or its subsidiaries of their contractual rights with respect thereto or other adverse effect thereon could negatively affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
As of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
AVISTA UTILITIES
Substantially all of Avista Utilities' properties are subject to the lien of Avista Corp.'s mortgage indenture.
Our utility electric properties, located in the states of Washington, Idaho, Montana and Oregon, include the following:
Generation Properties
|
| | | | | | | |
| No. of Units | | Nameplate Rating (MW) (1) | | Present Capability (MW) (2) |
Hydroelectric Generating Stations (River) | | | | | |
Washington: | | | | | |
Long Lake (Spokane) | 4 | | 70.0 |
| | 88.0 |
|
Little Falls (Spokane) | 4 | | 32.0 |
| | 35.6 |
|
Nine Mile (Spokane) (3) | 4 | | 26.4 |
| | 22.4 |
|
Upper Falls (Spokane) | 1 | | 10.0 |
| | 10.2 |
|
Monroe Street (Spokane) | 1 | | 14.8 |
| | 15.0 |
|
Idaho: | | | | | |
Cabinet Gorge (Clark Fork) (4) | 4 | | 265.0 |
| | 273.0 |
|
Post Falls (Spokane) | 6 | | 14.8 |
| | 15.4 |
|
Montana: | | | | | |
Noxon Rapids (Clark Fork) | 5 | | 487.8 |
| | 562.4 |
|
Total Hydroelectric | | | 920.8 |
| | 1,022.0 |
|
Thermal Generating Stations (cycle, fuel source) | | | | | |
Washington: | | | | | |
Kettle Falls GS (combined-cycle, wood waste) (5) | 1 | | 50.7 |
| | 53.5 |
|
Kettle Falls CT (combined-cycle, natural gas) (5) | 1 | | 7.2 |
| | 6.9 |
|
Northeast CT (simple-cycle, natural gas) | 2 | | 61.8 |
| | 64.8 |
|
Boulder Park GS (simple-cycle, natural gas) | 6 | | 24.6 |
| | 24.0 |
|
Idaho: | | | | | |
Rathdrum CT (simple-cycle, natural gas) | 2 | | 166.5 |
| | 166.5 |
|
Montana: | | | | | |
Colstrip Units 3 and 4 (simple-cycle, coal) (6) | 2 | | 233.4 |
| | 222.0 |
|
Oregon: | | | | | |
Coyote Springs 2 (combined-cycle, natural gas) | 1 | | 287.0 |
| | 284.4 |
|
Total Thermal | | | 831.2 |
| | 822.1 |
|
Total Generation Properties | | | 1,752.0 |
| | 1,844.1 |
|
| |
(1) | Nameplate Rating, also referred to as “installed capacity,” is the manufacturer’s assigned power capability under specified conditions. |
| |
(2) | Present capability is the maximum capacity of the plant under standard test conditions without exceeding specified limits of temperature, stress and environmental conditions. Information is provided as of December 31, 2014. |
| |
(3) | There are four units at the Nine Mile plant; however, Units 1 and 2 are not operating due to a mechanical failure. A project is underway to replace these units and restore capability. The present capability disclosed above represents the capability of the two operating units, which have a nameplate rating of 18 MW combined. |
| |
(4) | For Cabinet Gorge, we have water rights permitting generation up to 265 MW. However, if natural stream flows will allow for generation above our water rights we are able to generate above our water rights. If natural stream flows only allow for generation at or below 265 MW, we are limited to generation of 265 MW. The present capability disclosed above represents the capability based on maximum stream flow conditions when we are allowed to generate above our water rights. |
| |
(5) | These generating stations can operate as separate single-cycle plants or combined-cycle with the natural gas plant providing exhaust heat to the wood boiler to increase efficiency. |
| |
(6) | Jointly owned; data refers to our 15 percent interest. |
Electric Distribution and Transmission Plant
Avista Utilities owns and operates approximately 19,000 miles of primary and secondary electric distribution lines providing service to retail customers. We have an electric transmission system of 676 miles of 230 kV line and 1,553 miles of 115 kV line. We also own an 11 percent interest in approximately 500 miles of a 500 kV line between Colstrip, Montana and Townsend, Montana. Our transmission and distribution systems also include numerous substations with transformers, switches, monitoring and metering devices, and other equipment.
The 230 kV lines are the backbone of our transmission grid and are used to transmit power from generation resources, including Noxon Rapids, Cabinet Gorge and the Mid-Columbia hydroelectric projects, to the major load centers in our service area, as well as to transfer power between points of interconnection with adjoining electric transmission systems. These lines interconnect at various locations with the BPA, Grant County PUD, PacifiCorp, NorthWestern Energy and Idaho Power Company and serve as points of delivery for power from generating facilities outside of our service area, including Colstrip, Coyote Springs 2 and the Lancaster Plant.
These lines also provide a means for us to optimize resources by entering into short-term purchases and sales of power with entities within and outside of the Pacific Northwest.
The 115 kV lines provide for transmission of energy and the integration of smaller generation facilities with our service-area load centers, including the Spokane River hydroelectric projects, the Kettle Falls projects, Rathdrum CT, Boulder Park and the Northeast CT. These lines interconnect with the BPA, Chelan County PUD, the Grand Coulee Project Hydroelectric Authority, Grant County PUD, NorthWestern Energy, PacifiCorp and Pend Oreille County PUD. Both the 115 kV and 230 kV interconnections with the BPA are used to transfer energy to facilitate service to each other’s customers that are connected through the other’s transmission system. We hold a long-term transmission agreement with the BPA that allows us to serve our native load customers that are connected through the BPA’s transmission system.
Natural Gas Plant
Avista Utilities has natural gas distribution mains of approximately 3,400 miles in Washington, 2,000 miles in Idaho and 2,300 miles in Oregon. We have natural gas transmission mains of approximately 75 miles in Washington and 50 miles in Oregon. Our natural gas system includes numerous regulator stations, service distribution lines, monitoring and metering devices, and other equipment.
We own a one-third interest in Jackson Prairie, an underground natural gas storage field located near Chehalis, Washington. Jackson Prairie has a total peak day deliverability of 12.0 million therms, with a total working natural gas capacity of 256 million therms. As an owner, our share is one-third of the peak day deliverability and total working capacity. Natural gas storage enables us to store gas in the summer when prices are traditionally lower and withdraw during higher priced winter months. Natural gas storage is also used as a variable peaking resource during cold weather events.
ALASKA ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY
Substantially all of AEL&P's utility properties are subject to the lien of the AEL&P mortgage indenture.
AEL&P's utility electric properties, located in Alaska include the following:
Generation Properties and Transmission and Distribution Lines
|
| | | | | | | |
| No. of Units | | Nameplate Rating (MW) (1) | | Present Capability (MW) (2) |
Hydroelectric Generating Stations | | | | | |
Snettisham (3) | 3 | | 78.2 |
| | 78.2 |
|
Lake Dorothy | 1 | | 14.3 |
| | 14.3 |
|
Salmon Creek | 1 | | 8.4 |
| | 5.0 |
|
Annex Creek | 2 | | 4.1 |
| | 3.6 |
|
Gold Creek | 3 | | 1.6 |
| | 1.6 |
|
Total Hydroelectric | | | 106.6 |
| | 102.7 |
|
Diesel Generating Stations | | | | | |
Lemon Creek | 11 | | 61.4 |
| | 57.5 |
|
Auke Bay | 3 | | 36.2 |
| | 28.3 |
|
Gold Creek | 5 | | 8.2 |
| | 8.1 |
|
Total Diesel | | | 105.8 |
| | 93.9 |
|
Total Generation Properties | | | 212.4 |
| | 196.6 |
|
| |
(1) | Nameplate Rating, also referred to as “installed capacity,” is the manufacturer’s assigned power capability under specified conditions. |
| |
(2) | Present capability is the maximum capacity of the plant under standard test conditions without exceeding specified limits of temperature, stress and environmental conditions. Information is provided as of December 31, 2014. |
| |
(3) | AEL&P does not own this generating facility but has a power purchase agreement under which it has the right to purchase, and the obligation to pay for (whether or not energy is received), all of the capacity and energy of this facility. See further information at "Part 1. Item 1. Business - AEL&P Overview." |
In addition to the generation properties above, AEL&P owns approximately 61 miles of transmission lines, which is primarily comprised of 69 kV line, and approximately 184 miles of distribution lines.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See “Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for information with respect to legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Avista Corp. Market Information and Dividend Policy
Avista Corp.'s common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “AVA.” As of January 31, 2015, there were 9,238 registered shareholders of our common stock.
Avista Corp.'s Board of Directors considers the level of dividends on our common stock on a regular basis, taking into account numerous factors including, without limitation:
| |
• | our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, |
| |
• | the success of our business strategies, and |
| |
• | general economic and competitive conditions. |
Avista Corp.'s net income available for dividends is generally derived from our regulated utility operations (Avista Utilities and AEL&P).
The payment of dividends on common stock could be limited by:
| |
• | certain covenants applicable to preferred stock (when outstanding) contained in the Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (currently there are no preferred shares outstanding), |
| |
• | certain covenants applicable to the Company's outstanding long-term debt and committed line of credit agreements (see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis - "Capital Resources" for compliance with these covenants), |
| |
• | the hydroelectric licensing requirements of section 10(d) of the FPA (see “Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”), and |
| |
• | certain requirements under the OPUC approval of the AERC acquisition. After the initial year, the OPUC does not permit one-time or special dividends from AERC to Avista Corp. and does not permit Avista Utilities' total equity to total capitalization to be less than 40 percent, without approval from the OPUC. However, the OPUC approval does allow for regular distributions of AERC earnings to Avista Corp. as long as AERC remains sufficiently capitalized and insured. |
On February 6, 2015, Avista Corp.’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share on the Company’s common stock. This was an increase of $0.0125 per share, or 4 percent from the previous quarterly dividend of $0.3175 per share.
For additional information, see “Notes 1, 17, 18 and 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
The following table presents quarterly high and low stock prices as reported on the consolidated reporting system, as well as dividend information:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 31 | | June 30 | | September 30 | | December 31 |
2014 | | | | | | | |
Dividends paid per common share | $ | 0.3175 |
| | $ | 0.3175 |
| | $ | 0.3175 |
| | $ | 0.3175 |
|
Trading price range per common share: | | | | | | | |
High | $ | 30.83 |
| | $ | 33.58 |
| | $ | 33.60 |
| | $ | 37.37 |
|
Low | $ | 27.71 |
| | $ | 30.02 |
| | $ | 30.35 |
| | $ | 30.55 |
|
2013 | | | | | | | |
Dividends paid per common share | $ | 0.305 |
| | $ | 0.305 |
| | $ | 0.305 |
| | $ | 0.305 |
|
Trading price range per common share: | | | | | | | |
High | $ | 27.48 |
| | $ | 29.26 |
| | $ | 29.21 |
| | $ | 28.45 |
|
Low | $ | 24.10 |
| | $ | 25.68 |
| | $ | 25.55 |
| | $ | 25.88 |
|
For information with respect to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans, see “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On June 13, 2014, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 4 million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, assuming the closure of the Ecova transaction (2014 program). Repurchases of common stock under the 2014 program commenced on July 7, 2014 and the 2014 program expired on December 31, 2014. Repurchases were made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Through December 31, 2014, we repurchased 2,529,615 shares at a total cost of $79.9 million and an average cost of $31.57 per share. All repurchased shares under the 2014 program reverted to the status of authorized but unissued shares.
The following table provides information about share repurchases that we made during the three months ended December 31, 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | | (d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program |
October 1 to October 31, 2014 | 606 |
| | $ | 31.20 |
| | 606 |
| | 1,470 |
|
November 1 to November 30, 2014 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,470 |
|
December 1 to December 31, 2014 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,470 |
|
Total | 606 |
| | $ | 31.20 |
| | 606 |
| | 1,470 |
|
On December 16, 2014, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 800,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, commencing on January 2, 2015, and continuing through March 31, 2015 (first quarter 2015 program). The number of shares repurchased through the first quarter 2015 program will be in addition to the number of shares repurchased under the 2014 program, which expired on December 31, 2014. The parameters of the first quarter 2015 program are consistent with the parameters of the 2014 program. We have not repurchased any shares under the first quarter 2015 program through January 31, 2015. All repurchased shares, if any, will revert to the status of authorized but unissued shares.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share data and ratios) | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Operating Revenues: | | | | | | | | | |
Avista Utilities | $ | 1,413,499 |
| | $ | 1,403,995 |
| | $ | 1,354,185 |
| | $ | 1,443,322 |
| | $ | 1,419,646 |
|
AEL&P | 21,644 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other | 39,219 |
| | 39,549 |
| | 38,953 |
| | 40,410 |
| | 61,067 |
|
Intersegment eliminations | (1,800 | ) | | (1,800 | ) | | (1,800 | ) | | (1,800 | ) | | (24,008 | ) |
Total | $ | 1,472,562 |
| | $ | 1,441,744 |
| | $ | 1,391,338 |
| | $ | 1,481,932 |
| | $ | 1,456,705 |
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (pre-tax): |
Avista Utilities | $ | 239,976 |
| | $ | 232,572 |
| | $ | 188,778 |
| | $ | 202,373 |
| | $ | 198,200 |
|
AEL&P | 6,221 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other | 6,391 |
| | (1,483 | ) | | (1,680 | ) | | 4,714 |
| | 5,669 |
|
Total | $ | 252,588 |
| | $ | 231,089 |
| | $ | 187,098 |
| | $ | 207,087 |
| | $ | 203,869 |
|
Net income from continuing operations | $ | 119,866 |
| | $ | 104,333 |
| | $ | 76,803 |
| | $ | 90,658 |
| | $ | 85,058 |
|
Net income from discontinued operations | 72,411 |
| | 7,961 |
| | 1,997 |
| | 12,881 |
| | 9,890 |
|
Net income | $ | 192,277 |
| | $ | 112,294 |
| | $ | 78,800 |
| | $ | 103,539 |
| | $ | 94,948 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | $ | (236 | ) | | $ | (1,217 | ) | | $ | (590 | ) | | $ | (3,315 | ) | | $ | (2,523 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Avista Corporation shareholders: |
Avista Utilities | $ | 113,263 |
| | $ | 108,598 |
| | $ | 81,704 |
| | $ | 90,902 |
| | $ | 86,681 |
|
AEL&P | 3,152 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Ecova - Discontinued operations | 72,390 |
| | 7,129 |
| | 1,825 |
| | 9,671 |
| | 7,433 |
|
Other | 3,236 |
| | (4,650 | ) | | (5,319 | ) | | (349 | ) | | (1,689 | ) |
Net income attributable to Avista Corp. shareholders | $ | 192,041 |
| | $ | 111,077 |
| | $ | 78,210 |
| | $ | 100,224 |
| | $ | 92,425 |
|
Average common shares outstanding, basic | 61,632 |
| | 59,960 |
| | 59,028 |
| | 57,872 |
| | 55,595 |
|
Average common shares outstanding, diluted | 61,887 |
| | 59,997 |
| | 59,201 |
| | 58,092 |
| | 55,824 |
|
Common shares outstanding at year-end | 62,243 |
| | 60,077 |
| | 59,813 |
| | 58,423 |
| | 57,120 |
|
Earnings per common share attributable to Avista Corp. shareholders, basic: |
Earnings per common share from continuing operations | $ | 1.94 |
| | $ | 1.74 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 1.53 |
|
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations | 1.18 |
| | 0.11 |
| | 0.02 |
| | 0.17 |
| | 0.13 |
|
Total earnings per common share attributable to Avista Corp. shareholders, basic | $ | 3.12 |
| | $ | 1.85 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 1.73 |
| | $ | 1.66 |
|
Earnings per common share attributable to Avista Corp. shareholders, diluted: |
Earnings per common share from continuing operations | $ | 1.93 |
| | $ | 1.74 |
| | $ | 1.30 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 1.52 |
|
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations | 1.17 |
| | 0.11 |
| | 0.02 |
| | 0.16 |
| | 0.13 |
|
Total earnings per common share attributable to Avista Corp. shareholders, diluted | $ | 3.10 |
| | $ | 1.85 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 1.72 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except per share data and ratios) | Years Ended December 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 1.27 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| | $ | 1.16 |
| | $ | 1.10 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
|
Book value per common share | $ | 23.84 |
| | $ | 21.61 |
| | $ | 21.06 |
| | $ | 20.30 |
| | $ | 19.71 |
|
Total Assets at Year-End: | | | | | | | | | |
Avista Utilities | $ | 4,367,926 |
| | $ | 3,940,998 |
| | $ | 3,894,821 |
| | $ | 3,809,446 |
| | $ | 3,589,235 |
|
AEL&P | 264,195 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Other | 80,210 |
| | 81,282 |
| | 95,638 | |