QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrant ý

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 

Micron Technology, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
        
 
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
        
 
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
 
    (5)   Total fee paid:
        
 

o

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        
 
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
 
    (3)   Filing Party:
        
 
    (4)   Date Filed:
        
 

GRAPHIC


Notice of 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
December 16, 2010

To the Shareholders:

        NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), will be held on December 16, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Mountain Standard Time, at the Company's headquarters located at 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632, for the following purposes:

        The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

        Only shareholders of record at the close of business on October 18, 2010, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open to the examination of any shareholder, for any purpose germane to the business to be transacted at the meeting, during ordinary business hours for the ten-day period immediately preceding the date of the meeting, at the Company's headquarters at 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632.

        The Securities and Exchange Commission permits proxy materials to be furnished over the Internet rather than in paper form. Accordingly, we are sending most of our shareholders a notice regarding the availability of this proxy statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010 and other proxy materials via the Internet (the "Notice"). This electronic process gives you fast, convenient access to the materials, reduces the impact on the environment and reduces our printing and mailing costs. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice also instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and Annual Report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your vote over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice.

        Attendance at the Annual Meeting will be limited to shareholders and guests of the Company. Shareholders may be asked to furnish proof of ownership of the Company's Common Stock before being admitted to the meeting. Directions to the meeting's location accompany the Proxy Statement.

        To ensure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to vote. You may vote by telephone or electronically via the Internet. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy, you may sign, date and return the proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose. Please refer to the instructions included with the proxy card for additional details. Shareholders attending the meeting may vote in person even if they have already submitted their proxy, and any previous votes that were submitted by the shareholder, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will be superseded by the vote that such shareholder casts at the meeting.

    By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

Roderic W. Lewis
Vice President of Legal Affairs,
General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

Boise, Idaho
November 5, 2010

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY.


GRAPHIC

8000 South Federal Way
Boise, Idaho 83716-9632



PROXY STATEMENT
2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

December 16, 2010
9:00 a.m. Mountain Standard Time




INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

General

        The proxy is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of Micron Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), for use at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 16, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Mountain Standard Time, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the "Annual Meeting"). The purpose of the Annual Meeting is set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Annual Meeting will be held at the Company's headquarters located at 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632. Directions to the Annual Meeting accompany this Proxy Statement. The Company's telephone number is (208) 368-4000.

        This Proxy Statement and related proxy card are first being distributed on or about November 5, 2010, to all shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting.

        Shareholders can vote their shares using one of the following methods:

        Internet and telephone voting are available 24 hours a day, and if you use one of those methods, you do not need to return a paper proxy or voting instruction card. Unless you are planning to vote at the meeting, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on December 15, 2010.

Record Date

        Shareholders of record at the close of business on October 18, 2010 (the "Record Date") are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.

1


Revocability of Proxy

        Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person or by delivering to the Company a written notice of revocation or another duly executed proxy bearing a date later than the earlier given proxy but prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.

Solicitation

        The cost of solicitation will be borne by the Company. In addition, the Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may be solicited by the Company's directors, officers and employees, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone or Internet. The Company intends to use the services of Phoenix Advisory Partners, a proxy solicitation firm, in connection with the solicitation of proxies. Although the exact cost of the solicitation services is not known at this time, it is anticipated that the fees paid by the Company for these services will be approximately $12,500.

Outstanding Shares

        The Company has one class of stock outstanding, common stock, $.10 par value per share (the "Common Stock"). At October 18, 2010, the Record Date, 996,244,449 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.

Voting Rights and Required Vote

        Under the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and its Bylaws, each shareholder will be entitled to one vote for each share of the Company's Common Stock held at the Record Date for all matters, including the election of directors, unless cumulative voting for the election of directors is required (in the manner specified below). The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is a majority of the votes eligible to be cast by holders of shares of the Company's Common Stock issued and outstanding on the Record Date. Shares that are voted "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" are treated as being present at the Annual Meeting for the purposes of establishing a quorum and are tallied to determine the shareholders' decision with respect to the matter voted upon (the "Votes Cast"). Abstentions will have the same effect as voting against a proposal. Broker non-votes will be considered present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but such non-votes are not deemed to be Votes Cast and, therefore, will not be included in the tabulation of the voting results with respect to voting results for the election of directors or issues requiring the approval of a majority of Votes Cast.

        Shares held in a brokerage account or by another nominee are considered held in "street name" by the shareholder or "beneficial owner." A broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner may not vote on matters relating to the election of directors or equity compensation plans unless the broker or nominee receives specific voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. As a result, absent specific instructions, brokers or nominees may not vote a beneficial owner's shares on Items 1 and 2 and such shares will be considered "broker non-votes" for such proposals.

        Directors will be elected if the number of votes "FOR" a particular director exceeds the number of votes "AGAINST" that same director. With respect to each other item of business, the "FOR" vote of a majority of the Votes Cast is required in order for such matter to be considered approved by the shareholders.

2


        Cumulative voting for the election of directors shall not be required unless a shareholder has requested cumulative voting by written notice to the Secretary of the Company at least 15 days prior to the date of the meeting. If cumulative voting is required with respect to the election of directors, each voting shareholder may cumulate such shareholder's votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of votes to which the shareholder's shares are entitled, or distribute the shareholder's votes among as many candidates as the shareholder thinks fit, provided that votes cannot be cast for more than seven candidates. If cumulative voting is required, the persons authorized to vote shares represented by proxies shall have the authority and discretion to vote such shares cumulatively for any candidate or candidates for whom authority to vote has not been withheld.

Voting of Proxies

        The shares of the Company's Common Stock represented by all properly executed proxies received in time for the meeting will be voted in accordance with the directions given by the shareholders. If no instructions are given with respect to a properly executed Proxy timely received by the Company, the shares of the Company's Common Stock represented thereby will be voted (i) FOR each of the nominees named herein as directors, or their respective substitutes as may be appointed by the Board of Directors, (ii) FOR approval of the amendment to the Company's 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, (iii) FOR ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending September 1, 2011, and (iv) in the discretion of the proxy holders for such business which may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

3



PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

        The Company's Bylaws currently authorize a Board of Directors comprised of seven members. A board of seven directors is to be elected at the Annual Meeting, all of whom have been recommended for nomination by a majority of the independent directors of the Board of Directors and all of whom are currently serving as directors of the Company. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for management's seven nominees named below. Your proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement. If any management nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the present Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee listed below will be unable or will decline to serve as a director. The term of office of each person elected as a director will continue until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until such person's successor has been elected and qualified, except in the case of earlier resignation or removal. Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors and serve until their successors are duly appointed and qualified, except in the case of earlier resignation or removal. The names of the nominees and certain information about them are set forth below:

 
   
   
   
  Board Committees*  
 
   
   
  Served as a
Director Since
 
Name of Nominee
  Age   Principal Occupation   A   C   G  

Teruaki Aoki

    69  

President of Sony University of Sony Corporation

    2006           X     X  

Steven R. Appleton

    50  

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

    1994                    

James W. Bagley

    71  

Executive Chairman of Lam Research Corporation

    1997                    

Robert L. Bailey

    53  

Chairman of PMC-Sierra, Inc.

    2007     X           X  

Mercedes Johnson

    56  

Former Chief Financial Officer of Avago Technologies Limited

    2005     X           X  

Lawrence N. Mondry

    50  

Former President and Chief Executive Officer of CSK Auto Corporation

    2005           X     X  

Robert E. Switz

    64  

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ADC Telecommunications, Inc.

    2006     X           X  

*
A = Audit Committee, C = Compensation Committee, G = Governance Committee

        Set forth below are the principal occupations of the nominees for at least the past five years:

        Teruaki Aoki has served as President of Sony University of Sony Corporation since April 2005. Dr. Aoki has been associated with Sony since 1970 and has held various executive positions, including Senior Executive Vice President and Executive Officer of Sony Corporation as well as President and Chief Operating Officer of Sony Electronics, a U.S. subsidiary. Dr. Aoki holds a Ph.D. in Material Sciences from Northwestern University as well as a BS in Applied Physics from the University of Tokyo. He was elected as an IEEE Fellow in 2003 and serves as Life Associate of the Kellogg School of Management of Northwestern University. Dr. Aoki currently serves on the board of Citizen Holdings Co., Ltd. and has served on the board of Kellogg School of Management of Northwestern University during the past five years. Dr. Aoki is the Chairman of the Board's Compensation Committee.

        Dr. Aoki's experience with Sony over the past 40 years has given him expertise in international business, operations, management and the technology industry.

4


        Steven R. Appleton joined the Company in February 1983 and has served in various capacities with the Company and its subsidiaries. Mr. Appleton first became an officer of the Company in August 1989 and has served in various officer positions with the Company since that time. From April 1991 until July 1992 and since May 1994, Mr. Appleton has served on the Company's Board of Directors. From September 1994 to June 2007, Mr. Appleton served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Since June 2007, Mr. Appleton served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Mr. Appleton has served on the Board of Directors of National Semiconductor Corporation since 2001. Mr. Appleton holds a BA in Business Management from Boise State University.

        Mr. Appleton has been with the Company for over 25 years and his experiences have given him extensive expertise in the Company's business and operations. He has also developed expertise in the areas of finance, corporate development, corporate governance, business strategy and management.

        James W. Bagley became the Executive Chairman of Lam Research Corporation ("Lam"), a supplier of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, in June 2005. From August 1997 through June 2005, Mr. Bagley served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Lam. Mr. Bagley currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Teradyne, Inc. He has served on the Company's Board of Directors since June 1997. Mr. Bagley holds a MS and BS in Electrical Engineering from Mississippi State University.

        Mr. Bagley's experience as CEO and Chairman of a leading semiconductor manufacturer supplier has given him expertise in the semiconductor industry as well business operations, management and finance.

        Robert L. Bailey currently is Chairman of the Board of Directors of PMC-Sierra ("PMC") since 2005 and also served as PMC's Chairman from February 2000 until February 2003. Mr. Bailey has been a director of PMC since October 1996. He also served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of PMC from July 1997 until May 2008. PMC is a leading provider of broadband communication and semiconductor storage solutions for the Internet. Mr. Bailey currently serves on the Board of Directors of Entropic Communications, Inc. Mr. Bailey holds a BS degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Bridgeport and an MBA from the University of Dallas.

        Mr. Bailey's experience as CEO and Chairman of a leading technology company has given him expertise in the technology industry as well business operations, finance, corporate development, corporate governance and management.

        Mercedes Johnson was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Avago Technologies Limited, a supplier of analog interface components for communications, industrial and consumer applications, from December 2005 to August 2008. Prior to that, she served as the Senior Vice President, Finance, of Lam from June 2004 to January 2005 and as Lam's Chief Financial Officer from May 1997 to May 2004. Ms. Johnson holds a degree in Accounting from the University of Buenos Aires and currently serves on the Board of Directors for Intersil Corporation. Ms. Johnson is the Chairman of the Board's Audit Committee.

        Ms. Johnson's experience as the CFO of several technology companies has given her expertise in finance, corporate development, corporate governance, management and operations.

        Lawrence N. Mondry was the President and Chief Executive Officer of CSK Auto Corporation ("CSK"), a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts, from August 2007 to July 2008. Prior to his appointment at CSK, Mr. Mondry served as the Chief Executive Officer of CompUSA Inc. from November 2003 to May 2006. Mr. Mondry joined CompUSA in 1990. Mr. Mondry has served on the board of Golfsmith, Inc. during the past five years. Mr. Mondry is the Chairman of the Board's Governance Committee and Presiding Director.

5


        Mr. Mondry's experience as the CEO of various retailers has given him expertise in operations, management, finance and corporate development. Mr. Mondry's retail expertise is especially relevant to the Company's Lexar and Crucial business.

        Robert E. Switz is currently Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ADC Tele-communications, Inc. ("ADC"), a supplier of network infrastructure products and services. Mr. Switz has been President and Chief Executive Officer of ADC since August 2003 and Chairman since July 2008. He has been with ADC since 1994 and prior to his current position, served ADC as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Switz holds an MBA from the University of Bridgeport as well as a degree in Marketing/Economics from Quinnipiac University. Mr. Switz currently serves on the Board of Directors for ADC and Broadcom Corporation.

        Mr. Switz' experience as CEO and Chairman of a leading technology company has given him expertise in the technology industry as well business operations, finance, corporate development, corporate governance and management.

        There is no family relationship between any director or executive officer of the Company.


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

        The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. A copy of the Micron Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company's website at www.micron.com/code and is also available in print upon request. Any amendments or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will also be posted on the Company's website within four business days of the amendment or waiver as required by applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the Listing Rules of NASDAQ.

Director Independence

        On October 12, 2010, the Board of Directors determined that directors Aoki, Bailey, Johnson, Mondry and Switz qualify as independent directors. In determining the independence of our directors, the Board of Directors has adopted independence standards that mirror exactly the criteria specified by applicable laws and regulations of the SEC and the Listing Rules of NASDAQ. None of these directors have a relationship with the Company, other than any relationship that is categorically not material under the guidelines referenced above and other than as disclosed in this Proxy Statement under "Compensation of Directors" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."

Board Leadership Structure

        Mr. Appleton serves as the Company's Chairman and CEO. The Company does not have a fixed policy on whether the roles of chairman and CEO should be separate or combined. The decision is based on the best interests of the Company and its shareholders under the circumstances existing at the time. The Board believes that Mr. Appleton's unique knowledge of the Company's business and the opportunities and challenges it faces best position him to develop agendas that ensure the Board's time and attention are focused on the issues that matter most to the Company. Each year the Board appoints an independent Presiding Director to oversee meetings of the independent directors and act as a liaison between the Board and CEO.

6


Risk Assessment Role

        The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the major risks facing the Company and reviewing management's proposals for their mitigation. In addition, the Board has delegated oversight of certain categories of risk to the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management significant financial and nonfinancial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control, and report such exposures. The Compensation Committee oversees management of risks relating to the Company's compensation plans and programs. The Governance Committee manages risks associated with board governance and director independence. The Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees report to the Board regularly on matters relating to the specific areas of risk the committees oversee.

Compensation Risks

        We have assessed the Company's compensation programs and have concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company's management worked with Mercer, its outside compensation consultant, to assess the Company's compensation programs to determine if the programs' provisions and operations create undesired or unintentional risk of a material nature. This risk assessment process included a review of program policies and practices; program analysis to identify risk and risk control related to the programs; and determinations as to the sufficiency of risk identification, the balance of potential risk to potential reward and risk control. Although we reviewed all compensation programs, we focused on the programs with variability of payout, with the ability of a participant to directly affect payout and the controls on participant action and payout. In most cases, the Company's compensation policies and practices are centrally designed and administered, and are substantially the same at each business unit. Certain internal groups have different or supplemental compensation programs tailored to their specific operations and goals, and programs may differ by country due to variations in local laws and customs.

Board Meetings and Committees

        The Board of Directors of the Company held five meetings during fiscal 2010. The Board of Directors met in Executive Session four times during fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2010, the Board of Directors had a standing Audit Committee, Governance Committee and Compensation Committee. During fiscal 2010, the Audit Committee met nine times, the Compensation Committee met five times and the Governance Committee met two times. In addition to formal committee meetings, the chairmen of the committees engaged in regular discussions with management regarding various issues relevant to their respective committees. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors during fiscal 2010. All incumbent directors who served on the Compensation or Audit Committee attended 75% or more of the total number of committee meetings during fiscal 2010. Messrs. Bailey and Switz were unable to attend 75% or more of the total number of Governance Committee meetings during fiscal 2010. All directors attended the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders in 2009. The Company encourages director attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

        The Audit Committee, the Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee each have written charters that comply with federal and NASDAQ rules relating to corporate governance matters. Copies of the committee charters as well as the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Company's website at www.micron.com and are also available in print upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com. The Board has determined that all the members of the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee satisfy the independence requirements of applicable federal laws and the Listing Rules of NASDAQ for such committees.

7


        The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines specify a mandatory retirement age of 70 for members of its Board of Directors. In October 2009, the Board waived this requirement with respect to Mr. Bagley.

        Ms. Johnson and Messrs. Bailey and Switz currently serve on the Audit Committee. In October 2010, Ms. Johnson was appointed Chairman of the Audit Committee, replacing Mr. Switz, who served as Chairman from October 2007 through October 2010. The Board has determined that Ms. Johnson and Messrs. Bailey and Switz each qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" for purposes of the rules and regulations of the SEC. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in overseeing and monitoring (i) the integrity of the Company's financial statements, (ii) the performance of the Company's internal audit function, (iii) the performance of the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, (iv) the qualifications and independence of the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and (v) the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the Audit Committee report that is included in the Company's annual Proxy Statement. See "Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors." The complete duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.

        Dr. Aoki, Ms. Johnson, and Messrs. Bailey, Mondry and Switz currently serve on the Governance Committee. Mr. Mondry has served as Chairman of the Governance Committee since October 2009. The responsibilities of the Governance Committee include assisting the Board in discharging its duties with respect to (i) the identification and selection of nominees to the Company's Board of Directors, (ii) director compensation and (iii) the development of Corporate Governance Guidelines for the Company. The complete duties and responsibilities of the Governance Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.

        The Governance Committee is responsible for identifying nominees for the Company's Board of Directors. There are no minimum qualifications that nominees must possess, however, the following factors are strongly considered by the Governance Committee in making its recommendations: substantial experience in the semiconductor industry or related industries; strong business acumen and judgment; excellent interpersonal skills; business relationships with key individuals in industry, government and education that may be of significant assistance to the Company and its operations; familiarity with accounting rules and practices; and "independence" as defined and required by the Listing Rules of NASDAQ and relevant rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board of Directors has determined that it would be advisable to add additional members to the Board. To that end, the Governance Committee works with a third party executive search firm to assist them in the identification and evaluation of potential candidates to the Company's Board of Directors. It is currently anticipated that additional members may join the Company's Board of Directors in 2011.

        The Governance Committee will consider director nominee recommendations from shareholders. Shareholder recommendations for directors are subject to the same criteria used to evaluate other candidates. Shareholders wishing to recommend a prospective nominee should submit the candidate's name and qualifications to the Company's Corporate Secretary at corporatesecretary@micron.com. The Company's Bylaws contain the provisions that address the process by which a shareholder may nominate an individual to stand for election to the Company's Board of Directors. A copy of the Company's Bylaws can be found on the Corporate Governance page of its website at www.micron.com and is available in print

8



upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com. During fiscal 2010, the Company did not receive any director nominations from shareholders.

        Dr. Aoki and Mr. Mondry currently serve on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Dr. Aoki has served as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee since October 2009. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the compensation of the Company's officers. See the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and the "Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation" for information regarding how the Compensation Committee sets executive compensation levels. The complete duties of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its written charter, which is available at www.micron.com and is also available in print upon request to corporatesecretary@micron.com.

        In October 2010, Mr. Mondry was appointed Presiding Director of the Company's Board of Directors and will chair executive session meetings of the board (meetings in which only non-employee directors are present) for fiscal 2011.

        Shareholders and interested parties wishing to communicate with the Company's Board of Directors may contact Mr. Mondry at presidingdirector@micron.com.

9



COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

        The Governance Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the setting of compensation for the Company's non-employee members of its Board of Directors. At the end of fiscal 2009, the Governance Committee reviewed recent developments and trends in the area of director compensation with Mercer, the Company's outside compensation consultant, and concluded that changes to director compensation levels at the Company were not needed. At the end of fiscal 2010, the Governance Committee engaged Mercer to review and evaluate director compensation for fiscal 2011 in light of prevailing market conditions. Mercer gathered and reviewed market data for non-employee directors from the same Compensation Peer Group used to evaluate officer compensation. For a discussion of peer group companies please see "Executive Compensation and Related Information Compensation Discussion and Analysis." In October 2010, upon completion of its review and evaluation, the Governance Committee recommended to the Board increases in (i) the annual retainer paid to non-employee directors, (ii) the fee paid to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and (iii) the fee paid to the Presiding Director.

Elements of Director Compensation

        Annual Retainer.    Directors who are not employees of the Company are entitled to receive an annual retainer of $75,000. The amount of the annual retainer was increased from $50,000 to $75,000 in October 2010. In light of the global economic crisis, the Company's directors reduced their annual retainer by 20%. Pursuant to the Company's 2008 Director's Compensation Plan ("DCP"), non-employee directors may elect to take some or all of their annual retainer in the form of cash, shares of Common Stock or deferred rights to receive Common Stock upon termination as a director. During the period from October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010, Ms. Johnson received 5,256 shares of Common Stock under the DCP in lieu of cash. During the same period, Mr. Bagley deferred the receipt of 956 shares of Common Stock under the DCP in lieu of cash. Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional or special remuneration for their service as directors.

        Set forth below are the amounts received by directors for their service as committee chair or Presiding Director in fiscal 2010 and the amounts that are expected to be received in fiscal 2011:

 
  2010   2011  

Audit Committee Chair

  $ 17,500   $ 20,000  

Compensation Committee Chair

    10,000     10,000  

Governance Committee Chair

    10,000     10,000  

Presiding Director

    12,500     15,000  

        Except for the foregoing, directors do not receive any additional or special remuneration for their service on any of the committees established by the Board of Directors.

        The Company also reimburses directors for travel and lodging expenses, if any, incurred in connection with attendance at Board of Directors' meetings.

        Equity Award.    A "targeted value" for annual non-employee director equity compensation is established each year. Following discussions with Mercer, the Board determined that such targeted value for fiscal 2010 should remain at the level set in 2008 of $225,000. Based on this amount, the Board approved an award of 28,231 shares of restricted Common Stock to each of the directors, derived by dividing the targeted value of $225,000 by the Fair Market Value, as defined under the Company's equity plans, of the Company's Common Stock. For purposes of the Company's equity plans, "Fair Market Value" equals the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on the last trading day prior to the date of grant. The restrictions on the shares awarded for fiscal 2010 lapse for 50% of such shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant and will lapse for the remaining 50% on the second anniversary of the date of grant (the "Vesting Period"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions as to the fiscal 2010 shares will lapse for 100% of such shares in the event a director either reaches the mandatory retirement age or

10



retires from the Board during the Vesting Period having achieved a minimum of three years of service with the Board of Directors prior to the effective date of his or her retirement.

Director Compensation

        The following table details the total compensation earned by the Company's non-employee directors in fiscal 2010.

Name
  Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
  Stock
Awards(1)
  All Other
Compensation(2)
  Total  

Teruaki Aoki

  $ 56,667   $ 225,001   $ 5,750   $ 287,418  

James W. Bagley

    46,494     225,001         271,495  

Robert L. Bailey

    46,667     225,001         271,668  

Mercedes Johnson

    46,388     225,001         271,389  

Lawrence N. Mondry

    67,974     225,001         292,975  

Robert E. Switz

    64,167     225,001         289,168  

(1)
On October 6, 2009, each director who was not an employee of the Company was granted 28,231 shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units with a grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Statements Codification Topic 718 ("ASC 718"), of $225,001 ($7.97 per share). For information on the restrictions associated with these awards, see "Elements of Director Compensation—Equity Awards" above. Specific amounts expensed for each director vary as a result of the director's holdings, length of service and age. Any dividends payable with respect to the Company's Common Stock will be payable with respect to all awards of restricted stock. The total number of outstanding restricted shares and options held as of September 2, 2010, for each non-employee director was as follows:

 
   
  Options*  
Name
  Restricted Stock   Number of
Shares
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 

Teruaki Aoki**

    53,343     4,375   $ 16.36  

James W. Bagley

    53,343     50,000     15.65  

Robert L. Bailey

    53,343          

Mercedes Johnson

    53,343     17,500     11.27  

Lawrence N. Mondry

    53,343     17,500     10.99  

Robert E. Switz

    53,343     4,375     16.36  

*
All options are fully vested and exercisable. Option expiration dates range from October 2010 to September 2013. Prior to fiscal 2005, directors' annual equity awards were comprised exclusively of stock options.

**
Dr. Aoki received restricted stock units in lieu of restricted stock.
(2)
Reflects amounts incurred to cover tax services provided by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Japan ("Deloitte") and the gross-up provided to Dr. Aoki to cover the taxes on the services provided by Deloitte.

11



PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

        The following table sets forth security ownership information of the Company's Common Stock as of the Record Date (October 18, 2010), based on the most current information provided to the Company by the beneficial owners, available to the Company from its own records or provided in SEC filings made by the beneficial owners, for (i) persons known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company's Common Stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each Named Executive Officer listed in the "Summary Compensation Table" set forth herein, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
  Number of
Shares Owned(1)
  Right to Acquire(2)   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
  Percent of
Class(3)
 

BlackRock, Inc.(4)

    70,514,879         70,514,879     7.1 %
 

40 East 52nd Street

                         
 

New York, NY 10022

                         

FMR LLC(5)

   
127,572,027
   
   
127,572,027
   
12.8

%
 

82 Devonshire Street

                         
 

Boston, MA 02109

                         

Intel Corporation(6)

   
66,500,875
   
   
66,500,875
   
6.7

%
 

2200 Mission College Boulevard

                         
 

Santa Clara, CA 95054-1549

                         

STMicroelectronics, N.V.(7)

   
66,882,942
   
   
66,882,942
   
6.7

%
 

Chemin Du Cham-DesFilles, 39

                         
 

1228 Plan-Les-Ouates

                         
 

Geneva, Switzerland

                         

Teruaki Aoki

    59,702     4,375     64,077     *  

Steven R. Appleton(8)

    2,297,459     2,705,750     5,003,209     *  

James W. Bagley

    151,516     91,925     243,441     *  

Robert L. Bailey

    102,683         102,683     *  

D. Mark Durcan(9)

    1,083,506     1,363,750     2,447,256     *  

Ronald C. Foster(10)

    557,325     465,750     1,023,075     *  

Mercedes Johnson

    151,584     17,500     169,084     *  

Mario Licciardello

    85,692         85,692     *  

Lawrence N. Mondry

    149,016     17,500     166,516     *  

Brian M. Shirley

    352,923     641,850     994,773     *  

Robert E. Switz

    115,891     4,375     120,266     *  

All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)

    7,050,031     7,555,814     14,605,845     1.5 %

*
Represents less than 1% of shares outstanding

(1)
Excludes shares that may be acquired through the exercise of outstanding stock options.

(2)
Represents shares that an individual has a right to acquire within 60 days of the Record Date, October 18, 2010.

(3)
For purposes of calculating the Percent of Class, shares that the person or entity had a Right to Acquire are deemed to be outstanding when calculating the Percent of Class of such person or entity, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating the Percent of Class of any other person or entity.

12


(4)
BlackRock Inc. has sole voting and dispositive power as to 70,514,879 shares. This information was taken from Schedule 13G dated December 31, 2009.

(5)
FMR LLC has sole power to vote as to 2,028,730 shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 127,572,027 shares. This information was taken from Schedule 13G dated February 16, 2010.

(6)
Intel Corporation ("Intel") has sole voting and dispositive power as to 5,071 shares and shared voting and dispositive power as to 66,495,804 shares. By reason of the provisions of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act, Intel Corporation is deemed to own beneficially the shares of Issuer that are owned by Intel Technology Asia Pte Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intel Corporation. Intel Technology Asia Pte Ltd owns 66,495,804 shares of Micron Technology, Inc.

(7)
ST Microelectronics, N.V. ("ST") has sole voting and dispositive power as to 66,882,942 shares.

(8)
Includes 53,000 shares beneficially owned by Mesa L.P.

(9)
Includes 284,653 shares beneficially owned by C & E Partners L.P. and 3,101 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Durcan's spouse.

(10)
Includes 1,026 shares held jointly with Mr. Foster's spouse.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

        This Compensation Discussion and Analysis presents material information helpful or necessary to understand the objectives and policies of our compensation program for executive officers and the compensation reported in the tables that follow. Throughout this discussion, those individuals named in the "Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table" are referred to as our "Named Executive Officers" and the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is referred to as the "Committee."

        Mario Licciardello, one of the Company's Named Executive Officers, joined the Company in May 2010 as a result of the Company's acquisition of Numonyx Holdings B.V. (the "Numonyx Acquisition"). Mr. Licciardello's compensation for fiscal 2010 was determined by Numonyx prior to the consummation of the Numonyx Acquisition. Pursuant to the Numonyx Acquisition agreements, which were approved by the Company's Board of Directors, the Company assumed the compensation obligations of Numonyx to Mr. Licciardello. As a result, the following discussion related to the Company's compensation practices for its executive officers does not apply to Mr. Licciardello's fiscal 2010 compensation. Mr. Licciardello's fiscal 2011 compensation will be determined by the Committee in accordance with the practices outlined below and the terms of Mr. Licciardello's employment agreement.

Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program

        Our executive compensation program is administered by the Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors (as defined in the Listing Rules of NASDAQ as well as applicable federal law). The Committee is comprised of Dr. Aoki and Mr. Mondry. The Committee assists the Board of Directors in discharging its responsibilities with respect to the compensation of the Company's officers. The Committee has direct responsibility to review and approve corporate goals and objectives used to determine the chief executive officer's compensation, evaluate his performance in light of such goals and objectives, and determine and approve his compensation level based on this evaluation. The Committee also reviews the evaluation process and compensation structure for the Company's other officers, including the other Named Executive Officers, and approves their compensation.

        The Committee annually engages an outside compensation consultant, currently Mercer. The Committee also works closely with the Company's chief executive officer. A more complete description of the Committee's responsibilities is provided in the Committee's Charter approved by the Board of Directors, which can be found on the Company's website (www.micron.com) in the governance section. A

13



more complete description of the role of the chief executive officer and Mercer in the compensation process is described later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Objective of our Executive Compensation Program

        Our primary long-term corporate objective is to create superior value for our shareholders. The objective of the executive compensation program is to attract, motivate, reward, and retain highly qualified executive officers who are able to achieve the corporate objective of superior value for our shareholders. The executive compensation program is designed to provide a foundation of fixed compensation (base salary and time-based restricted shares) and a significant portion of performance-based compensation (short-term and long-term incentive opportunities, such as cash bonuses, performance-based restricted stock and stock options), that align the interests of executives with those of our shareholders.

Guiding Principles

        We believe we have the best opportunity to attract, motivate, reward and retain qualified individuals, and, thus, to meet our overall objective of increasing shareholder value, by offering a compensation package that is "reasonable" and "competitive" with what our executives could otherwise obtain in the market, and especially from companies within our Compensation Peer Group. Our Compensation Peer Group consists of companies that we believe are especially likely to be our competitors for executive talent and is discussed further in "Market Data Defined" below. What is "reasonable" and "competitive" is gauged against the Market Data (as defined below) and reviewed by the Committee for each of the primary elements of compensation.

        As an approximation of reasonableness, the Committee typically looks to the Market Data median. The Committee also reviews Market Data values at the 25th and 75th percentile. Base salaries are generally targeted to approximate the median of the Market Data but may be above or below depending upon an executive's contributions, experience, performance and service.

        With respect to short-term incentive compensation, we pay for achievement of financial, operational and strategic objectives approved by the Committee at the beginning of each fiscal year. The short-term incentive opportunities are set to be competitive with market practices but actual incentive payouts are commensurate with achievement. Thus, we have adopted a "pay for performance" approach as it relates to short-term incentives. Although we review the short-term incentive opportunities against the Market Data at the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th percentile values, the opportunities are not necessarily limited to any particular data point. Please see the discussion under the heading "Fiscal 2010 short-term incentive awards."

        With respect to long-term incentive compensation, we believe such compensation should be tied to the success of the Company and increases in shareholder value. Accordingly, we make "performance-based" equity awards a significant component of our executive compensation program. The performance-based equity awards we use are restricted stock with restrictions that lapse upon the achievement of certain goals and stock options that vest over time and increase in value only if the Company's results drive increases in its stock price. To ensure our long-term incentive program helps retain executives, we also believe it is appropriate to have "time-based" equity awards as a component of the program. The time-based equity instrument we use is restricted stock with restrictions that lapse based on continued service with the Company. The Committee works with Mercer to determine the allocation and type of performance- and time-based awards to grant each fiscal year. The Committee currently believes that a 50-25-25 split between stock options, performance-based restricted stock and time-based restricted stock, respectively, strikes the right balance between reward for long-term Company success and retentive effect. Despite the 25-25 split in value for restricted shares, the actual number of restricted shares awarded with

14



performance-based restrictions will not be the same as the number of such shares awarded having time-based restrictions because there is a "probability-of-achievement" discount applied to the value ascribed to performance-based restricted shares. This results in the actual number of shares in the two categories being different from one another with the number of performance-based shares exceeding the number of time-based shares. The Company uses a 20% discount in calculating the number of performance-based restricted shares. For information on how the number of award shares is calculated and the application of the probability-of-achievement discount, please see the discussion below on "Fiscal 2010 long-term equity incentives."

        We believe it is important to retain flexibility in determining the compensation of our officers and, when appropriate, to deviate from the Market Data median due to factors such as:

        The semiconductor industry is highly volatile and changes in Market Data, which is a compilation of data from many companies, may be dramatic from year to year. Market Data can change as compensation practices change, executives retire or are replaced with less experienced and lower-paid executives, goals are achieved or not achieved resulting in varying payouts, participants in proprietary surveys change, and the completeness or accuracy of compensation data improves or deteriorates. Accordingly, what may have been the "median" or within a reasonable range of competitiveness in one year, may be higher or lower for the next. For this reason, shareholders should understand that even though the Committee manages compensation in accordance with such guiding principles, officer compensation may vary, above or below the median, or a range from the median, year over year.

        Given our experience, as well as advice we have received from Mercer, we believe a competitive compensation package will consider and measure compensation practices for executive positions with respect to three primary elements of compensation:

        Executive perquisites, which for us are minor in scope and amount, are also reviewed but are not considered to be material elements of compensation. We also believe it is appropriate for the Named Executive Officers to participate on the same terms and conditions as all other employees of the Company in programs and benefits that are offered to the employee population at large. Generally, these programs consist of medical, dental, vision, short-term and long-term disability, life insurance, time-off with pay and a 401(k) retirement program. These benefits are viewed as important for competitive purposes but not material to the overall cost of an executive compensation package offered to our Named Executive Officers.

15


        We do not require that a particular element comprise a set portion of the total compensation mix. We do believe, however, that a significant portion of the compensation should be variable (such as performance-based incentives) as compared to fixed (such as base salary and time-based restricted shares) and that such variable compensation should align executives' interests with those of the Company's shareholders. Additionally, although the Committee reviews total direct compensation, which is the sum of base salary, short-term incentive and long-term incentive compensation for the Named Executive Officers, it does not have a fixed objective with respect to such total direct compensation. For fiscal 2010, the total direct compensation approved by the Committee with respect to our Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello, was within the 25th to 75th percentile range, with Messrs. Foster and Durcan below the Market Data median and Messrs. Appleton and Shirley above the Market Data median for similarly situated executives.

"Market Data" Defined

        Compensation data is gathered by Mercer from proxy statements of the Compensation Peer Group and from published compensation surveys.

        Survey data may vary from year to year. For fiscal 2010, Mercer used the CHiPS Executive and Senior Management Total Compensation Survey, Radford Executive Survey and Buck Executive Total Direct Compensation Survey. We believe these surveys are particularly relevant for high technology companies given the high level of participation by such companies in the survey.

        Data is also gathered from proxy statements and other documents that are filed with the SEC to develop the Compensation Peer Group data.

        Mercer works with the Committee and our management team, including our chief executive officer, to identify peer companies for compensation comparison purposes. The peer companies are primarily selected based on their industry, degree of business match (i.e., semiconductor or electronics manufacturing), and comparability of revenue size. All the peer companies have a Global Industry Classification Standard economic sector classification of Information Technology and an industry classification related to semiconductor or other electronic equipment. The companies selected generally fall within a revenue range of approximately one-fourth to double the size of Micron and have a high degree of business match. We believe our custom peer group is comprised of companies that are likely to be our competitors for executive talent.

        Each year we reevaluate the composition of our Compensation Peer Group to ensure that it reflects industry or economic changes that may have occurred during the fiscal year, such as, changes in business strategies, operations, revenues, product lines or availability of information. For fiscal 2010, the Compensation Peer Group of companies changed from the group used for fiscal 2009, with the addition of Marvell Technology Group Ltd and ON Semiconductor Corporation and the removal, due to bankruptcy, of Spansion, Inc. As a result of these changes, the Company's Compensation Peer Group for 2010 consisted of: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Agilent Technologies, Inc., Analog Devices, Inc., Applied Materials, Inc., Broadcom Corporation, Infineon Technologies AG, Marvell Technology Group Ltd, National Semiconductor Corporation, Nvidia Corporation, ON Semiconductor Corporation, QUALCOMM Incorporated, SanDisk Corporation, STMicroelectronics N.V. and Texas Instruments Incorporated. These companies are referred to in the compensation discussion and analysis as the "Compensation Peer Group."

        When collecting and assessing market compensation data we collect data based on job descriptions first. This permits the Committee to "match" positions held by our executives with those of other

16



companies and, as described more fully below, deviate from benchmarked data based on the factors described earlier. If we are not able to match positions to a reasonable number of companies within the Compensation Peer Group, we look to the rank of the person involved and match ranks, e.g., highest paid Company officer is ranked to the highest paid officer at each company within the Compensation Peer Group.

        The relevant survey and Compensation Peer Group data for fiscal 2010 were weighted equally and are collectively referred to throughout this discussion as the "Market Data."

Compensation Consultant

        As mentioned previously, the Committee annually engages a compensation consultant, currently Mercer, to provide a comprehensive review of cash and non-cash elements, and also to review payment data, both historical and trend data, with respect to all of the Company's officers.

        The Committee has established procedures that it considers adequate to ensure that Mercer's advice to the Committee remains objective and is not influenced by the Company's management. These procedures include: a direct reporting relationship to the Committee; a provision in the Committee's engagement letter with Mercer specifying what information, data, and recommendations can be shared with management; and an annual update to the Committee on Mercer's relationship with the Company, including a summary of the work performed for the Company during the preceding 12 months. The specific activities that Mercer undertakes for the Company include:

        The Company paid Mercer a total of $314,864 in fiscal 2010 for services provided to the Committee and the Company. Of this amount $73,279 was paid as a result of the work Mercer performed for the Committee, $117,309 was paid as a result of the work Mercer performed related to the Company's 401(k) Plan and other human resource functions and $124,276 was paid for employee medical insurance. The decision to use Mercer for services other than those provided to the Committee was made by the Company's management and was not approved by the Committee. Mercer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. ("MMC"). The Company paid MMC $46,770 in fiscal 2010 for insurance services.

Compensation-setting Process and the Determination of Compensation Levels

        The Committee reviews the compensation of our executive officers on an annual basis in connection with the annual financial results for the fiscal year just ended and projections for the current fiscal year.

        Mercer reviews and identifies the most recent available data and identifies the Market Data for the 25th, 50th (i.e. median) and 75th percentile with respect to each position or rank. Mercer compares the Company's compensation data, both as to elements and amounts to be paid or potential value to be delivered, with that of the Market Data and reports its findings to the chief executive officer and the Committee chair. The Company's chief executive officer works with Mercer by providing Company financial data with respect to the most-recently completed fiscal year. The chief executive officer also

17



reviews projected Company financial results for the current fiscal year and the Company's strategic business plan. The chief executive officer makes suggestions as to base salary, recommends a potential set of Company-wide and/or business unit metrics and targets for the current fiscal year with respect to short-term incentives and offers suggestions as to long-term incentive compensation for the Named Executive Officers other than himself. He makes no recommendations as to his own level of compensation.

        The Committee reviews the Market Data, discusses the Market Data with the chief executive officer and with Mercer, discusses individual officer performance based on input from the chief executive officer and, without the chief executive officer present, discusses the chief executive officer's own performance for the most-recently completed fiscal year and anticipated performance for the current year. The Committee uses the Market Data and the deliberations to determine whether our compensation is competitive and reasonable as described above and whether, and to what extent, the Committee believes it would be appropriate to deviate from the Market Data and competitive practices. Following this deliberation, the Committee exercises its business judgment to certify the payment of compensation based on the financial results for the most-recently completed fiscal year, and approves the compensation for the current fiscal year, including the metrics and targets for the current year, deviating, as appropriate, from the Market Data based on the factors described earlier.

Components of the Executive Compensation Program

        The following charts show the compensation mix for the Company's CEO and for CEO's in the Compensation Peer Group:

GRAPHIC   GRAPHIC

        The purpose of a competitive base salary is to compensate executives for performing their day-to-day job responsibilities. Base salaries are generally targeted to approximate the Market Data median. At the completion of fiscal 2009, the Market Data showed that the base salaries of all of the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello, were within +/- 10% from the median for their positions or ranks. The Committee determined, following a recommendation by the chief executive officer and upon review by Mercer, to leave unchanged the base salary for all of the Company's officers. The Committee also reviewed Market Data related to CEO and CFO compensation and determined to leave those salaries unchanged for fiscal 2010.

        In light of the impact of the global financial and economic crisis on the Company's operations, in October 2008, the Committee implemented a 20% reduction in the base salaries of all the Company's

18



officers. In addition, in January 2009, Messrs. Appleton and Durcan reduced their base salary by an additional 10%. Officers' salaries were reinstated to their full amounts in March 2010 and in April 2010 the Committee approved a supplemental bonus to each of the Company's officers who participated in the pay reduction. See "Other" below for additional information on the supplemental bonus.

        Annual short-term incentive awards are paid in cash and made to the Company's officers under the Executive Officer Performance Incentive Plan ("EIP"). The short-term incentive "opportunity" ("Target Award") for each officer is stated in terms of a specified percentage of such officer's base salary and is designed to reward participants for the achievement of specified short-term business-unit and/or Company-wide financial, operational or strategic goals. The Committee believes the pre-determined goals, regardless of whether tied to business unit or Company-wide performance, promote the Company's long-term success and shareholder value.

        In October 2009, and in accordance with the provisions of the EIP, the Committee met and established goals for fiscal 2010. The fiscal 2010 goals, all of which were subject to the profitability goal identified in (a) below, included the following:

        The corporate goals of profitability, cash flow levels, and selling, general and administrative expenses were chosen due to their direct correlation to shareholder value creation. The new product revenue goal was chosen primarily for its potential indirect positive impact on the Company's business and results. The target incentive amounts that could be payable under the EIP for achievement of the fiscal 2010 goals are shown in the columns "Estimated Future Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards" of the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010" table. The target payout requires a significant level of effort without assurance of goal achievement. The fiscal 2010 goals did not include a threshold level so that there would be no payout unless the goal was fully achieved.

        The Target Awards established for fiscal 2010 for the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello, were measured against the Market Data median. As previously discussed, although we review the short-term incentive opportunities against the Market Data 25th, 50th (i.e. median) and 75th percentiles, the opportunities are not necessarily limited to the median of Market Data, but considered within the factors described under the section labeled "Reasonable" above. Actual results drive payouts and the Company pays for achievement of the pre-determined goals. For fiscal 2010, the following Target Awards were established:

19


        The following table shows the weighting of Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley's Target Awards among the various goals. The weightings reflect the officer's responsibilities and ability to affect the attainment of the goal.

EIP Weightings (as % of Target Incentive)

Named Executive Officer
  (a)
Profitability
  (b)
Operating
Cash
Flow
  (c)
Selling,
General &
Administrative
Expenses
  (d)
New Product
Revenue
 

Steven R. Appleton

    50 %   30 %   10 %   10 %

D. Mark Durcan

    45 %   30 %   10 %   15 %

Ronald C. Foster

    45 %   30 %   15 %   10 %

Brian M. Shirley

    45 %   30 %       25 %

        Following a review of fiscal 2010 results, the Committee determined that the goals (a), (b) and (c) were achieved and that goal (d) was not achieved. As a result of meeting these goals Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley received bonuses in the following amounts:

Named Executive Officer
  Bonus  

Steven R. Appleton

  $ 1,282,500  

D. Mark Durcan

    612,000  

Ronald C. Foster

    405,000  

Brian M. Shirley

    363,000  

        The foregoing amounts are included in the "Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table" in the column "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."

        The EIP calls for certain performance goals to be modified with respect to major corporate transactions if permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code. These events are more fully described in the EIP. Additionally, the Committee has the discretion to modify performance goals with respect to Target Awards that are not intended to satisfy Section 162(m) if the Committee determines that due to changes in business, operations, corporate or capital structure of the Company, the existing performance goals, are rendered unsuitable for a given performance period. Upon the occurrence of a "change in control" (as defined in the EIP), performance periods are deemed to have ended and the Committee will determine whether performance goals were achieved. Finally, the Committee always retains the ability to exercise "negative discretion" and reduce an amount otherwise earned pursuant to the EIP. In fiscal 2010, the Committee did not exercise any such negative discretion.

        In light of the global financial crisis, in October 2008, the Committee implemented a 20% reduction in the base salaries of all of the Company's officers. In January 2009, Messrs. Appleton and Durcan reduced their base salaries by an additional 10%. In addition, the EIP was suspended in fiscal 2009 and no bonuses were paid for fiscal 2009 performance. In April 2010, the Committee approved the payment of a supplemental bonus to each of the Company's officers in an amount equal to the amount that the officer

20


had forgone as a result of base salary reductions implemented in 2008 and 2009. Pursuant to this supplemental bonus, the following Named Executive Officers received:

Named Executive Officer
  Supplemental Bonus  

Steven R. Appleton

  $ 380,000  

D. Mark Durcan

    240,000  

Ronald C. Foster

    129,000  

Brian M. Shirley

    139,000  

        The foregoing amounts are included in the "Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table" in the column entitled "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."

        As a result of the Company achieving historical highs for revenue, income and cash flows in fiscal 2010, the Committee awarded the Company's officers supplemental bonuses for extraordinary achievement. These bonuses are not intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Section 162(m). Pursuant to this supplemental bonus, the following Named Executive Officers received:

Named Executive Officer
  Supplemental Bonus  

Steven R. Appleton

  $ 427,500  

D. Mark Durcan

    216,000  

Ronald C. Foster

    135,000  

Brian M. Shirley

    145,200  

        The foregoing amounts are included in the "Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table" in the column entitled "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation."

        Pursuant to the Company's objective to provide a competitive compensation package, with variable compensation being a significant portion of such package, the Company provided the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello, with equity awards in fiscal 2010. In connection therewith, the Committee reviewed the Market Data for the Compensation Peer Group for fiscal 2009, and found that 86% of the companies in the Compensation Peer Group used stock options, 43% of the companies used time-based restricted shares and 29% also used performance-based restricted shares as compensation vehicles for their executives. The Committee discussed the merits of performance-based awards, such as stock options and performance-based restricted stock, and how they aligned with maximizing shareholder value. Consistent with our guiding principles of being competitive with our Compensation Peer Group so as to retain qualified individuals, the Committee approved equity awards for fiscal 2010 that were comprised of 50% stock options, 25% performance- based restricted stock and 25% time-based restricted stock.

        With respect to the time-based restricted stock awards for fiscal 2010, the restrictions lapse as to one-fourth of the shares on each anniversary of the date of grant. With respect to the stock option awards for fiscal 2010, the options vest as to one-fourth of the shares on each anniversary of the date of grant. With respect to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted in fiscal 2010, the restrictions will lapse if the Company achieves a certain percentage return on assets ("ROA") over a consecutive rolling four-quarter period between the beginning of fiscal 2010 and the end of fiscal 2012 (the "Share Performance Period"). The achievement during the Share Performance Period of a lower threshold ROA percentage will result in the restrictions lapsing as to one-half of the fiscal 2010 performance-based shares. The achievement during the Share Performance Period of the target ROA percentage will result in the restrictions lapsing as to all of the fiscal 2010 performance-based shares. Both the threshold and target ROA percentages require significant effort with the achievement of neither ROA percentage being assured. In the absence of at least the threshold ROA percentage being achieved during the Share

21



Performance Period, the restrictions will not lapse and all of the fiscal 2010 performance-based shares set forth in the column titled "Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards-Target" of the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010" table will be forfeited. In determining the amount of the long-term equity incentive awards to be received by Mr. Appleton for fiscal 2010, the Committee reviewed the Market Data. While the Market Data showed that Mr. Appleton's then current long-term equity incentive opportunity based on value was approximately 25% above the median, the Committee decided to keep the value of Mr. Appleton's targeted long-term equity incentive award for fiscal 2010 targeted at $6,500,000. Mr. Appleton's long-term incentive award value has not changed since fiscal 2007.

        The following table sets forth the elements and amounts of Mr. Appleton's long-term incentive award for fiscal 2010:

Security
  Number of Options/Shares*   Value  

Options

    821,000   $ 3,237,051  

Time-based Restricted Stock

    218,000     1,626,280  

Performance-based Restricted Stock

    272,000     1,623,840  
           

    1,311,000   $ 6,487,171  
           

*
Option amount for Mr. Appleton was calculated by dividing $3,250,000 (50% of $6,500,000) by the estimated fair value of the Company's stock options at the time of the Committee's meeting on executive compensation. The time-based restricted share amount for Mr. Appleton was calculated by dividing $1,625,000 (25% of $6,500,000) by $7.46, the approximate fair market value of the Company's Common Stock at the time of the Committee's meeting on executive compensation. The performance-based restricted share amount for Mr. Appleton was calculated by dividing $1,625,000 (25% of $6,500,000) by $5.97 (20% discount to the $7.46 share price).

        Information related to Mr. Appleton's long-term incentive award also is included in the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010" table. The stock options are listed in the column "Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options," the time-based share amounts are listed in the column "Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units," and the performance-based share amounts are listed in the column "Estimated Future Payouts under Equity Incentive Plan Awards Target." Value differences between the amounts stated above and what is found in the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table in Fiscal 2010" are attributable to the 20% discount applied to the performance-based shares and the full fair value under ASC Topic 718.

        In determining the amount of the long-term equity incentive award for Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley, the Committee reviewed the Market Data and information provided by Mr. Appleton related to the officer's performance and a recommendation as to the amount of the award. For fiscal 2010, the long term equity incentive awards approved by the Committee for each of Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley fell between the 25th and 75th percentile of the Market Data for their position or rank. The share amounts for the other Named Executive Officers were calculated in the same fashion and appear in the same columns as were used for Mr. Appleton in the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010" table.

        The Company has not and does not plan to time the granting of long-term incentive awards (or the payment of any other compensation) with the release of material, non-public information. Historically, long-term incentive awards have been made in the first quarter of the fiscal year with the exact grant date corresponding with the date of the meeting of the Committee (which typically occurs approximately within the week following the Company's announcement of its results for the fiscal year). Historically, long-term incentive grants to the Named Executive Officers are approved by the Committee on the same day as the grants to other officers and the exercise price of stock options is equal to the fair market value of the

22



Company's Common Stock as defined by the applicable Company equity plan pursuant to which the award is granted. For purposes of the Company's equity plans, fair market value is defined as the closing price as quoted on NASDAQ for the last market trading day prior to the date of grant.

        The Company provides medical, dental, disability, life insurance and defined contribution retirement benefit programs, in which substantially all U.S. employees, including the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello, are entitled to participate. The role of these plans is to provide a competitive level of health, welfare and retirement benefits to substantially all employees.

        U.S. Time off with Pay.    In addition to cash and equity compensation programs, the Named Executive Officers participate in various other employee benefit plans, including, but not limited to, a time-off plan. Under the time-off plan, all employees of the Company, including the Named Executive Officers, are allowed to accumulate up to 999 hours of time-off to be used for vacation, holiday, sick time, emergencies and personal needs. Until January 2009, amounts accumulated in excess of 999 hours, if any, were paid out as regular compensation to participants, including the Named Executive Officers, and, with respect to the latter are included in the "Summary Compensation Table." Thereafter, the Company altered its time-off program and no longer pays compensation for amounts over 999 hours.

        U.S. 401(k) Retirement Benefits.    The Company provides retirement benefits to its employees, including the Named Executive Officers, under its tax-qualified 401(k) plan. Due to market conditions, in March 2009, the Company suspended making matching contributions. The Company expects to reinstate making its matching contributions in January 2011. The Named Executive Officers participate in the 401(k) plan on the same terms as all other Company employees.

        Mr. Licciardello's Benefits.    Mr. Licciardello is employed in Switzerland and so does not receive the U.S. benefits described above. He also does not participate in many of the benefit programs typical to the Company's employees in Switzerland. Due to his age, Numonyx was unable to obtain accident, life or disability insurance for Mr. Licciardello at a cost acceptable to Numonyx. As a result, Numonyx self-insured these risks. The Company is still self-insuring these risks while investigating alternative arrangements. In addition, due to his age, Mr. Licciardello did not qualify for Numonyx's Swiss pension arrangements. In lieu of participation in a pension arrangement, Mr. Licciardello is paid an additional CHF 1,250 (approximately $1,230) per month. Mr. Licciardello also receives a meal allowance of CHF 300 (approximately $295) per month and a housing allowance of CHF 6,000 (approximately $5,906) per month. The first CHF 3,000 of the housing allowance is tax exempt and the Company grosses up the remaining CHF 3,000 for taxes. All amounts shown in U.S. dollars reflect a conversion rate of 0.98435, which was the exchange rate for Swiss francs to U.S. dollars on September 2, 2010.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

        We have established stock ownership guidelines for our officers and directors. The Committee believes that officers will more effectively manage the Company in the best interests of the shareholders if they are also shareholders. The minimum ownership guideline for officers ranges from 10,000 to 90,000 shares, depending on the officer's position with the Company. Officers are given five years to meet the ownership guidelines. The Governance Committee reviews the Ownership Guidelines and monitors each covered executive's progress toward, and continued compliance with, the guidelines. Sales restrictions may be imposed upon the Company's officers and directors if the stock ownership guidelines are not met. For fiscal 2010, all officers were in compliance with the guidelines.

23


        The following table shows the guidelines for each of the Named Executive Officer's and their share holdings as of October 18, 2010.

 
  Share Holdings    
 
Named Executive Officer
  Common Stock*   Restricted Stock**   Guideline  

Steven R. Appleton

    1,395,877     901,582     90,000  

D. Mark Durcan

    655,283     428,223     90,000  

Ronald C. Foster

    261,698     295,627     30,000  

Mario Licciardello

    85,692         10,000  

Brian M. Shirley

    145,561     207,362     10,000  

*
Includes shares held directly and indirectly by Named Executive Officer.

**
Includes time-based and performance-based restricted stock which is subject to forfeiture.

Consideration of Tax Consequences when Making Compensation Decisions

        Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to the Named Executive Officers. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met. Historically, we have structured the key component of our long-term incentives in the form of stock option grants or performance-based restricted stock awards to comply with the statute. Awards under the Company's EIP also are generally designed to comply with the statute. Although the Committee believes it is important to preserve the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) whenever practicable, it reserves the right to grant or approve compensation or awards that may be non-deductible when it believes such compensation or awards are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Severance Agreements

        The Company has entered into a severance agreement with each of the Company's Named Executive Officers. Mr. Licciardello's severance agreement was entered into by Numonyx prior to the consummation of the Numonyx Acquisition and is still in effect. We believe severance agreements are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders because they are necessary to attract and retain qualified executive talent, promote candid discussion among the officers of the Company, help provide for a smooth transition when there is a change in management, provide the officer with benefits in consideration of a promise not to compete with the Company after termination of employment with the Company and release the Company, officers, directors, employees and agents from any and all claims.

        Estimated payments as of the end of fiscal 2010 under the severance agreements can be found in the "Voluntary or Involuntary Termination of Employment" table.

        Standard Severance Agreement (Named Executive Officers except Mr. Licciardello).    Each of our Named Executive Officers, except Mr. Licciardello, has a similar severance agreement in place with the Company (the "Severance Agreements"). In general, the Severance Agreements provide for severance payments upon termination of employment with the Company for any reason, including death, voluntary or involuntary termination or termination with or without cause. The Severance Agreements provide for a "Transition Period," which begins upon a "separation of service" as defined in Section 409A of the Code, regardless of when a termination of employment or loss of officer status occurs, and ends after a period of one year.

        Provided an officer complies with post-employment restrictions described below and all other terms of the Severance Agreement, the officer is entitled to receive compensation during the Transition Period equivalent to the compensation and benefits customarily provided to such officer while employed including, but not limited to, salary, bonuses, executive bonuses, benefits and continued vesting of any

24



granted stock options and restricted shares. With respect to short-term incentive awards and long-term equity awards that are performance-based, the officer is entitled to receive such awards only if the goals are achieved before or during the applicable Transition Period. Such terminated officers are not entitled to receive any new awards under the Company's equity plans or EIP or to the payment of any compensation that would be deferred past the Transition Period due to payment criteria of an incentive program, as those criteria exist as of the Termination Date.

        Terminated officers are subject to the following obligations and restrictions:

        Upon receipt of all benefits under the Severance Agreement, the officer and Company are considered to have settled, waived, and voluntarily released any and all claims each has or may have against the other, inclusive of any of the Company's affiliates, officers, directors, employees or agents, both individually and in their official capacities, which claims are accruing prior to the end of the Transition Period.

        Mr. Licciardello's Numonyx Severance Agreement.    Mr. Licciardello's Severance Agreement (the "Numonyx Severance Agreement") was entered into between him and Numonyx and is still in effect. The Numonyx Severance Agreement expires in accordance with its terms on May 7, 2011, which is the one-year anniversary of the Numonyx Acquisition. The Numonyx Severance Agreement provides for different severance benefits depending on the nature of Mr. Licciardello's termination:

25


Change-in-Control Arrangements

        The Company does not have separate change-in-control agreements for its executive officers or directors. The Severance Agreements and Numonyx Severance Agreement described above provide for transitional benefits in the event of termination of employment, including following a change in control. In addition, under the terms of the Company's equity compensation plans, equity awards may be substituted, assumed or accelerated upon a change in control, depending upon the circumstances. The compensation that executive officers and directors could receive if a change of control occurs is intended to allow them to evaluate objectively whether a potential change-in-control of the Company is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Estimated value that the Named Executive Officers could receive from the Company's change-in-control provisions can be found in the "Change-in-Control" table on page 34.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures contained in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement. Based upon this review and our discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee
Dr. Teruaki Aoki
Lawrence N. Mondry

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        No members of the Compensation Committee (Dr. Aoki and Mr. Mondry) are or have been officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. During fiscal 2010, no executive officer of the Company served on the Compensation Committee (or equivalent), or the board of directors of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on the Company's Compensation Committee or on the Board of Directors of the Company.

26



FISCAL 2010 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

        The following table details the total compensation earned by the Company's Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008.

Name and Principal Position
  Year   Salary(1)   Bonus(2)   Stock
Awards(3)
  Option
Awards(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation(4)
  All Other
Compensation(5)
  Total  

Steven R. Appleton

    2010   $ 806,405   $ 807,500   $ 3,655,400   $ 3,237,051   $ 1,282,500       $ 9,788,856  
 

Chief Executive Officer

    2009     731,865         3,637,760     3,793,402       $ 22,959     8,185,986  
 

(Principal Executive Officer)

    2008     950,000         7,312,505             49,392     8,311,897  

D. Mark Durcan

    2010     507,692     456,000     1,693,420     1,494,327     612,000         4,763,439  
 

President and Chief

    2009     462,231         1,680,000     1,752,223         2,178     3,896,632  
 

Operating Officer

    2008     600,000         3,375,011         233,712     9,200     4,217,923  

Ronald C. Foster(6)

    2010     404,654     264,000     1,126,460     997,532     405,000         3,197,646  
 

Chief Financial Officer

    2009     375,923         1,120,000     1,167,378         8,081     2,671,382  
 

(Principal Financial Officer)

    2008     186,923     100,260     1,125,011     740,515     102,031     420,615     2,675,355  

Mario Licciardello

    2010     165,118         3,959,874         498,868     37,602     4,661,462  
 

Vice President of

                                                 
 

Wireless Solutions

                                                 

Brian M. Shirley

    2010     433,452     284,200     842,980     745,192     363,000         2,668,824  
 

Vice President of

    2009     400,589         837,760     876,112         2,178     2,116,639  
 

DRAM Solutions

    2008     436,000         1,687,511         113,399     9,200     2,246,110  

(1)
In light of the impact of the global financial crisis on the Company's operations, in October 2008, the Company implemented a 20% reduction in the base salaries of all the Company's officers. In addition, in January 2009, Messrs. Appleton and Durcan reduced their base salary by an additional 10%. In March 2010, the officers' full salary was reinstated.


Mr. Licciardello joined the Company in May 2010 following the Company's acquisition of Numonyx. Mr. Licciardello is paid in Swiss francs and his annual base salary is CHF 525,000; the amount shown for 2010 reflects his prorated salary. Dollar amounts shown for Mr. Licciardello in the Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table and related footnotes have been calculated using the conversion ratio of 0.922251, which is the average daily exchange rate for the period from May 7, 2010 to September 2, 2010.

(2)
Includes amounts paid in fiscal 2010 pursuant to a supplemental bonus for the Company's officers for extraordinary achievement in fiscal 2010. Pursuant to this program, Mr. Appleton received $427,500, Mr. Durcan received $216,000, Mr. Foster received $135,000 and Mr. Shirley received $145,200.


Also includes bonus amounts paid in April 2010 to team members, including the Company's officers, whose base salary was reduced in fiscal 2009 in response to the global financial crisis. Pursuant to this program, Mr. Appleton received $380,000, Mr. Durcan received $240,000, Mr. Foster received $129,000 and Mr. Shirley received $139,000.


The 2008 amount for Mr. Foster includes a signing bonus of $50,000 and the taxes associated with the signing bonus of $50,260.

(3)
Assumptions used in determining the fair values of these option awards is set forth in the "Equity Plans" notes to the Company's financial statements included in its annual reports on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference.

(4)
All amounts shown for Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley were paid pursuant to the Executive Officer Incentive Plan ("EIP") and relate to the achievement of certain performance milestones. In light of the Company's financial results, in fiscal 2008, Mr. Appleton declined amounts earned under the EIP. In fiscal 2009, the EIP was suspended and no payments were made to the Named Executive Officers. For Mr. Licciardello, amount shown was paid pursuant to Numonyx Employee Bonus Plan.

(5)
Amounts shown reflect the following compensation for each Named Executive Officer:

    Matching contributions allocated by the Company to each of the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Company's 401(k) plan. No matching contributions were made in fiscal 2010. For fiscal 2009, the contribution for Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley was $2,178. For fiscal 2008, the matching contribution for Messrs. Appleton, Durcan and Shirley was $9,200 and for Mr. Foster $2,013.

    Under the Company's time-off plan, unused time-off in excess of 999 hours cannot be carried forward and prior to January 2009 was paid out in cash. In fiscal 2009 and 2008, Mr. Appleton received $20,781 and $40,192, respectively, under the time off plan.

    Mr. Foster was reimbursed for relocation expenses of $5,903 and $253,891 in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to his move from California to Idaho. Also included in Mr. Foster's fiscal 2008 amount are taxes associated with the relocation expenses in the amounts of $164,711.

    Mr. Licciardello's amount includes a meal allowance of $1,132, a pension allowance of $4,717 and a housing allowance of $31,752. Additional information on Mr. Licciardello's benefits is included in the "Compensation Analysis and Discussion" under the heading "Other fiscal 2010 employee benefits."

27


(6)
Mr. Foster joined the Company as Chief Financial Officer on April 1, 2008. Mr. Foster's base salary for fiscal 2008 was $450,000. Amount shown for fiscal 2008 reflects prorated salary.


GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2010

        The table below sets forth the plan-based award grants to the Company's Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2010.

 
   
   
   
   
   
  Estimated Future
Payouts under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
  Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units(3)
  Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options(4)
   
   
   
 
 
   
   
  Estimated Future Payouts under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
   
   
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock (or
units) and
Option(5)
 
 
   
   
   
  Close
Price
on Grant
Date
 
 
  Plan
Name
  Grant
Date
  Exercise
Price of
Options
 
Name
  Threshold   Target   Max   Threshold   Target  

Steven R. Appleton

  2004 Plan     10/05/09                       136,000     272,000                           $ 2,029,120  
 

Chief Executive Officer

  2004 Plan     10/05/09                                   218,000                       1,626,280  

  2001 Plan     10/05/09                                         821,000   $ 7.46   $ 7.97     3,237,051  

  EIP     10/05/09         $ 1,425,000                                                  

D. Mark Durcan

 
2004 Plan
   
10/05/09
                     
63,000
   
126,000
                           
939,960
 
 

President and Chief

  2004 Plan     10/05/09                                   101,000                       753,460  
 

Operating Officer

  2001 Plan     10/05/09                                         379,000     7.46     7.97     1,494,327  

  EIP     10/05/09           720,000                                                  

Ronald C. Foster

 
2004 Plan
   
10/05/09
                     
42,000
   
84,000
                           
626,640
 
 

Chief Financial Officer

  2004 Plan     10/05/09                                   67,000                       499,820  

  2001 Plan     10/05/09                                         253,000     7.46     7.97     997,532  

  EIP     10/05/09           450,000                                                  

Mario Licciardello

 
NMX EIP
   
05/07/10
                           
130,860
                           
1,145,025
 
 

Vice President of

  NMX EIP     05/07/10                                   321,697                       2,814,849  
 

Wireless Solutions

  NMX EB     05/07/10           639,828                                                  

Brian M. Shirley

 
2004 Plan
   
10/05/09
                     
31,500
   
63,000
                           
469,980
 
 

Vice President of

  2004 Plan     10/05/09                                   50,000                       373,000  
 

DRAM Solutions

  2001 Plan     10/05/09                                         189,000     7.46     7.97     745,192  

  EIP     10/05/09           484,000                                                  

(1)
For Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley, represents bonus target amounts set in fiscal 2010 under the Executive Officer Incentive Plan ("EIP"). Payment of bonuses under the EIP is dependent upon meeting specified performance goals. Target amounts represent the aggregate amount that would have been paid upon the successful achievement of the goals assigned to the Named Executive Officer. For Mr. Licciardello, represents amount paid under the Numonyx Employee Bonus Plan. Mr. Licciardello is paid in Swiss francs. Amount shown is based on conversion rate from September 2, 2010, of 0.98435.

(2)
For Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley, represents restricted stock awarded in fiscal 2010 under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Plan") with performance-based restrictions. Information related to the performance-based restrictions associated with these shares is contained in Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Target amounts represent the maximum number of shares that may be awarded. For Mr. Licciardello, represents shares issued under Numonyx Equity Incentive Plan. Mr. Licciardello's award was assumed by the Company in connection with its acquisition of Numonyx.

(3)
For Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley, represents restricted stock awarded in fiscal 2010 under the 2004 Plan with time-based restrictions. Time-based restrictions lapse in four equal installments over a four-year period from the date of the award. For Mr. Licciardello, represents shares issued under Numonyx Equity Incentive Plan.

(4)
For Messrs. Appleton, Durcan, Foster and Shirley, represents options awarded pursuant to the Company's 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"). All options have a term of six years and vest in equal installments over a four year period.

(5)
The expense shown for stock awards is based solely on the fair value as of the date of grant, disregarding any assumptions as to estimated forfeitures based on continued service. No other assumptions are used in the expense calculation for the stock awards. Under the Company's equity plans, fair market value is defined as the closing price on the last trading day prior to the date of grant. For purposes of the Company's equity plans and the calculation of "Grant Date Fair Value," the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant referenced in this table for October 5, 2009, was $7.46 (the closing price on October 2, 2009) and for May 7, 2010, was $8.75 (the closing price on May 6, 2010). The closing price of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant referenced in this table was $7.97 on October 5, 2009, and $8.57 on May 7, 2010. Assumptions used in determining the fair values of these option awards is set forth in the "Equity Plans" note to the Company's financial statements included in its annual report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010.

        Plan Information:    In fiscal 2010, compensatory awards were made to the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the EIP and the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Plan"). The EIP was approved by the Company's shareholders in 2004 and 2009. The purpose of the EIP is to attract, retain and reward qualified executives who are important to the Company's success by providing performance-based, incentive cash awards for outstanding performance at the individual, business-unit and Company-wide level. The purpose of the 2004 Plan is to promote the Company's success by linking the personal interests of its employees, officers, directors and consultants to those of the Company's shareholders, and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. Permissible awards under the 2004

28



Plan include: options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, deferred stock units and dividend equivalent rights. The Company has issued options, restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2004 Plan.

        Lapsing of Restrictions Associated with Restricted Stock Awards:    The restrictions associated with the restricted stock granted to the Named Executive Officers include both time-based restrictions and performance-based restrictions. Time-based restrictions applicable to awards made after fiscal 2006 lapse in four equal installments over a four-year period. For information on the restrictions associated with performance-based awards, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

        Restricted Stock.    Since fiscal 2006, the Company's executive officers have been granted restricted stock with performance-based restrictions related to the achievement of a minimum specified return on invested capital ("ROIC") or return on assets ("ROA") goal. Pursuant to ASC Topic 718, the Company incurs an expense for performance-based restricted stock when it is probable that the goals associated with the shares will be met. Expenses are not incurred or are reversed when a determination is made that achievement of the goals is not probable. In 2008, the Company reversed expenses recorded for performance-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2007. In 2009, the Company reversed expenses recorded for performance-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2008 and did not record any expenses for the awards granted in fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2010, the Company determined that the achievement of the goals associated with the performance-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2008, 2009 and 2010 was probable and recorded the full expense for those grants. The performance-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2008 and 2009 for Named Executive Officers vested on July 1, 2010, and the performance-based restricted stock granted in fiscal 2010 vested on October 11, 2010.

        Set forth below is information on total restricted stock award expenses recorded in the Company's financial statements for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 for the Named Executive Officers.

 
   
   
  Performance-based
Stock Awards
   
 
 
  Year   Time-based Stock
Award Expense
  Expense   (Expense
Reversal)
  Total Stock
Award Expense
 

Steven R. Appleton

    2010   $ 2,423,589   $ 8,112,100       $ 10,535,689  

    2009     2,113,395       $ (1,242,918 )   870,477  

    2008     2,245,375     1,242,918     (1,300,316 )   2,187,977  

D. Mark Durcan

    2010     1,243,294     3,746,810         4,990,104  

    2009     1,224,336         (574,885 )   649,451  

    2008     1,327,955     574,885     (600,486 )   1,302,354  

Ronald C. Foster

    2010     362,295     1,874,365         2,236,660  

    2009     241,155         (105,346 )   135,809  

    2008     51,030     105,346         156,376  

Mario Licciardello

    2010     300,302     187,341         487,643  

    2009                          

    2008                          

Brian M. Shirley

    2010     539,255     1,873,405         2,412,660  

    2009     552,748         (287,443 )   265,305  

    2008     563,496     287,443     (269,885 )   581,054  

        Cash Awards.    The performance milestones related to the payment of bonuses under the EIP for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were partially achieved or not achieved at all. As a result, bonuses for those fiscal years were not paid out at the levels indicated in the columns labeled "Estimated Future Payouts under Non-equity Incentive Plan Awards" on the "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2010" table. The EIP was suspended in 2009 and no bonuses were paid. The actual amount of the EIP bonuses paid for

29



fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 performance are included in the "Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table" in the column labeled "Non-Equity Plan Incentive Compensation." The performance milestones related to the EIP are discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

        In light of the Company achieving historical highs for revenue, income and cash flows in fiscal 2010, the Company's officers received supplemental bonuses for extraordinary achievement in October 2010. The amounts awarded pursuant to this supplemental bonus are included in the "Fiscal 2010 Summary Compensation Table" in the column "Bonus."

        Stock Option Vesting:    Since September 2004, options granted by the Company generally vest in four equal installments over a four-year period from the date of grant and have a term of six years.

        Determination of Stock-based Compensation:    Under the provisions of ASC Topic 718, stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life and forfeiture rates. The Company develops its estimates based on historical data and market information which can change significantly over time. A small change in the estimates used can result in a relatively large change in the estimated valuation.

        The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value employee stock awards. The Company estimates stock price volatility based on an average of its historical volatility and the implied volatility derived from traded options on the Company's stock. The estimated life of options granted in or after 2009 was based, in part, on historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the options. The estimate lives of options granted prior to 2009 were based on the simplified method provided by the SEC. Forfeiture rates are derived from historical experience and the terms and conditions of the options. For stock-based compensation awards with graded vesting that were granted after 2005, the Company recognizes compensation expense using the straight-line amortization method.

30



OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2010 FISCAL YEAR-END

        The following table provides information with respect to outstanding stock options and restricted shares held by the Company's Named Executive Officers as of September 2, 2010.

 
  Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(1)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(1)
 

Steven R. Appleton

    400,000         $ 21.11     9/21/2011     47,125 (2) $ 321,864     272,000 (3) $ 1,857,760  
 

Chief Executive Officer

    600,000           17.43     9/10/2012     151,163 (4)   1,032,443              

    80,000           9.16     4/22/2013     270,750 (5)   1,849,223              

    300,000           14.35     9/23/2013     218,000 (6)   1,488,940              

    300,000           15.91     3/29/2014                          

    420,000           12.03     10/1/2010                          

    410,250     1,230,750 (7)   4.48     10/3/2014                          

          821,000 (8)   7.46     10/5/2015                          

D. Mark Durcan

   
300,000
         
21.11
   
9/21/2011
   
21,750

(2)
 
148,553
   
126,000

(3)
 
860,580
 
 

President and Chief Operating

    300,000           17.43     9/10/2012     11,250 (11)   76,838              
 

Officer

    40,000           9.16     4/22/2013     69,445 (12)   474,309              

    125,000           14.35     9/23/2013     125,250 (5)   855,458              

    125,000           15.91     3/29/2014     101,000 (6)   689,830              

    130,000           12.03     10/1/2010                          

    189,500     568,500 (7)   4.48     10/3/2014                          

          379,000 (8)   7.46     10/5/2015                          

Ronald C. Foster

   
150,000
   
150,000

(9)
 
5.97
   
4/1/2014
   
41,877

(10)
 
286,020
   
84,000

(3)
 
573,720
 
 

Chief Financial Officer

    126,250     378,750 (7)   4.48     10/3/2014     83,250 (5)   568,598              

          253,000 (8)   7.46     10/5/2015     67,000 (6)   457,610              

Mario Licciardello

                           
215,537

(9)
 
1,472,118
   
87,677

(13)
 
598,834
 
 

Vice President of Wireless

                                                 
 

Solutions

                                                 

Brian M. Shirley

   
50,100
         
28.56
   
10/18/2010
   
9,800

(2)
 
66,934
   
63,000

(3)
 
430,290
 
 

Vice President of DRAM

    25,000           13.23     9/15/2011     34,723 (12)   237,158              
 

Solutions

    70,100           21.11     9/21/2011     62,250 (5)   425,168              

    65,000           13.55     12/16/2011     50,000 (6)   341,500              

    65,000           12.44     10/16/2012                          

    5,000           9.00     5/5/2013                          

    100,000           12.52     11/19/2013                          

    75,000           11.51     9/1/2014                          

    94,750     284,250 (7)   4.48     10/3/2014                          

          189,000 (8)   7.46     10/5/2015                          

(1)
Calculated by multiplying the number of shares of restricted stock by $6.83, the closing price of the Company's common stock on September 2, 2010.

(2)
Restrictions on shares lapse on September 26, 2010.

(3)
Performance-based restrictions on shares lapse upon the achievement of a specified minimum ROA goal by the fourth fiscal quarter of 2012. The metric was met in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010 and the shares were released on October 11, 2010.

(4)
Restrictions on shares lapse in equal installments on October 9, 2010 and October 9, 2011.

(5)
Restrictions on shares lapse in equal installments on October 3, 2010, October 3, 2011 and October 3, 2012.

(6)
Restrictions on shares lapse in equal installments on October 5, 2010, October 5, 2011, October 5, 2012 and October 5, 2013.

(7)
Options vest in equal installments on October 3, 2010, October 3, 2011 and October 3, 2012.

(8)
Options vest in equal installments on October 5, 2010, October 5, 2011, October 5, 2012 and October 5, 2013.

(9)
Options vest in equal installments on April 1, 2011 and April 1, 2012.

(10)
Restrictions on shares lapse in equal installments on April 1, 2011 and April 1, 2012.

(11)
Restrictions on shares lapse on August 27, 2011.

(12)
Restrictions on shares lapse in equal installments on October 8, 2010 and October 8, 2011.

(13)
Performance-based restrictions on shares lapse upon the achievement of a specified minimum revenue goal for the fiscal year of 2010 and 2011. The metric for fiscal year 2010 was met and 50% of the shares will lapse on December 31, 2010.

31



OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2010

        The following table sets forth information related to the number of restricted shares held by each of the Named Executive Officers that vested in fiscal 2010 and the value realized. No options were exercised by the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2010.

 
  Stock Awards  
Name
  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
  Value
Realized
on Vesting(1)
 

Steven R. Appleton
Chief Executive Officer

    1,041,864   $ 8,713,682  

D. Mark Durcan
President and Chief Operating Officer

    491,084     4,089,206  

Ronald C. Foster
Chief Financial Officer

    292,379     2,493,497  

Mario Licciardello
Vice President of Wireless Solutions

    149,343     1,448,627  

Brian M. Shirley
Vice President of DRAM Solutions

    238,717     1,996,825  

(1)
Value calculated by multiplying number of shares by the market value of the shares on the vesting date.


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE-IN-CONTROL

        The following tables quantify the estimated payments and benefits for each of the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Severance Agreements and the Numonyx Severance Agreement described in the "Severance Agreements" section of the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis." The amounts were calculated as if the Named Executive Officers separated from service on September 2, 2010, the last day of fiscal 2010.

        For U.S.-based Named Executive officers (which excludes Mr. Licciardello), the "Salary" portion of severance payments are paid on the Company's regular bi-weekly payroll schedule during the officer's Transition Period subject to the possibility of a six-month delay that may be required by Section 409A of the Code. If Section 409A imposes a six-month delay, payments during the delay would be accumulated and paid to the officer on the first day of the seventh month following the officer's separation from service. The remaining payments would then be paid according to the Company's regular payroll schedule.

        The "Bonus" portion of the severance payments is paid only if the applicable performance goals are achieved before or during the applicable Transition Period. Such payments are made at the same time that the other officers participating in the applicable bonus plan receive their payments, if any, and typically would occur during the Company's first fiscal quarter.

        The "Cash in Lieu of Benefits" portion of the severance payments is calculated based on the difference between the amount of premiums the U.S.-based Named Executive Officer paid each month for benefits coverage as an employee of the Company and the estimated premiums the U.S.-based Named Executive Officer would need to pay each month for the same or similar coverage as a former employee of the Company. This monthly amount is multiplied by the number of months in the U.S.-based Named Executive Officer's Transition Period and is grossed-up for taxes. All gross-up calculations and payments are based on the standard supplemental withholding rates provided by federal and state guidelines. The Company does not use the U.S.-based Named Executive Officer's actual tax rate for these calculations. The "Cash in Lieu of Benefits" payment is made within 30 days after the officer's separation from service,

32



subject to the possibility of a six-month delay that may be required by Section 409A of the Code. If Section 409A imposes a six-month delay, the payment would be made to the officer on the first day of the seventh month following the officer's separation from service.

        Mr. Licciardello's severance entitlement varies based on the reason for the termination of his employment. For purposes of the following table, the Company has presumed that Mr. Licciardello's employment was terminated without "Severance Cause" or that he resigned for "Good Reason" because that would result in the greatest payment to him.

Voluntary or Involuntary Termination of Employment

Name
  Salary(1)   Bonus(2)   Cash in Lieu
of Benefits
Payment(3)
  Value of
Extended
Option
Vesting
and Exercise
Period(4)
  Value of
Extended
Restricted
Stock
Vesting(5)
  Value of
Unearned
Stock
Awards(6)
  Total  

Steven R. Appleton
Chief Executive Officer

  $ 950,000   $ 1,282,500   $ 68,451   $ 1,822,470   $ 1,826,728   $ 1,857,760   $ 7,807,909  

D. Mark Durcan
President and Chief Operating Officer

    600,000     612,000     47,868     847,498     920,153     860,580     3,888,099  

Ronald C. Foster
Chief Financial Officer

    450,000     405,000     59,650     754,788     446,943     573,720     2,690,101  

Mario Licciardello
Vice President of Wireless Solutions

    1,033,568     1,279,655             1,472,118     598,834     4,384,175  

Brian M. Shirley
Vice President of DRAM Solutions

    484,000     363,000     24,039     484,804     412,609     430,290     2,198,742  

(1)
Represents 12 months of the Named Executive Officer's monthly salary, except with respect to Mr. Licciardello. Represents two years salary for Mr. Licciardello (CHF 525,000 × 2 × .98435 (Swiss franc to the U.S. dollar exchange rate on September 2, 2010)).

(2)
Assumes payment of bonuses under the EIP for the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello. For Mr. Licciardello, represents payment of two years target bonus (CHF 650,000 × 2 × .98435 (Swiss franc to the U.S. dollar exchange rate on September 2, 2010)).

(3)
Represents a cash payment for an amount estimated to allow the Named Executive Officer to purchase during the Transition Period benefits similar to those he received while an employee of the Company. The amount listed includes a gross-up calculation for the tax impact of the payment.

(4)
Represents the value resulting from the additional vesting and exercise period for stock options provided by the Named Executive Officer's 12-month Transition Period. The fair value of each option award is estimated as of September 2, 2010, using the Black-Scholes model. Expected volatility is based on the implied volatility from traded options on the Company's stock and historical volatility. The expected term is based on the shorter of length of the Transition Period or remaining life of the option. The risk-free rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield.

(5)
Represents the value resulting from the additional vesting of restricted shares pursuant to the Named Executive Officer's 12-month Transition Period, except with respect to Mr. Licciardello for whom vesting is immediate. The amount shown is calculated as the number of shares multiplied by $6.83 per share, the Company's closing stock price on September 2, 2010.

(6)
The Company's performance-based goals have been established on a long-term basis using a four-quarter rolling average. Due to the Company's performance in recent fiscal quarters, the Company has assumed for purposes of this presentation that the performance-based goals related to these shares would have been met during the Named Executive Officer's 12-month Transition Period, except with respect to Mr. Licciardello for whom vesting is immediate.

33


Change-in-Control

        The Company does not have change-in-control arrangements for its Named Executive Officers. However, the Severance Agreements and Numonyx Severance Agreement described above provide for transitional benefits in the event of termination of employment, whether or not the termination is in connection with a change in control. In addition, under the Company's equity plans, upon a change in control, outstanding time-based awards automatically become fully vested or the applicable restrictions lapse and outstanding performance-based awards are treated as if all required performance goals were satisfied and are paid within 30 days on a pro-rata basis based on the amount of the performance period completed as of the date of the change in control. A change in control is generally defined as a change in the majority of the Board's directors within a specified time period or the acquisition of 35% or more of the Company's outstanding Common Stock. A corporate transaction is generally defined as merger or sale of substantially all of the Company's assets.

        Under the EIP, a change in control results in an early payout of awards, to the extent earned. Upon a change in control, performance achievement is measured as of the last day of the month preceding the change in control and is paid within 30 days.

        The following table sets forth the estimated benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers assuming a change in control or corporate transaction occurred on September 2, 2010. We have assumed for simplicity of presentation that benefits earned as of September 2, 2010, would have equaled benefits earned as of the end of the preceding month in the event of a change of control.

Name
  Bonus(1)   Value of
Options(2)
  Value of
Restricted
Stock(3)
  Total  

Steven R. Appleton
Chief Executive Officer

  $1,282,500   $ 2,892,263   $ 6,550,230   $ 10,724,993  

D. Mark Durcan
President and Chief Operating Officer

  612,000     1,335,975     3,105,567     5,053,542  

Ronald C. Foster
Chief Financial Officer

  405,000     1,019,063     1,885,947     3,310,010  

Mario Licciardello
Vice President of Wireless Solutions

  1,279,655         2,070,952     3,350,607  

Brian M. Shirley
Vice President of DRAM Solutions

  363,000     667,988     1,501,050     2,532,038  

(1)
Assumes payment of bonuses under the EIP for the Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Licciardello. For Mr. Licciardello, represents payment of two years target bonus (CHF 650,000 × 2 × .98435 (Swiss franc to the U.S. Dollar exchange rate on September 2, 2010)).

(2)
Assumes the acceleration of vesting for all outstanding options. Amount shown is calculated as the excess of $6.83, the closing price of the Company's stock on September 2, 2010, over the accelerated option's exercise price.

(3)
Assumes the lapsing of all restrictions associated with the shares. Amount shown is calculated as the number of shares on which restrictions would lapse multiplied by $6.83 per share, the Company's closing stock price on September 2, 2010.

34



EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

        The following table provides information as of September 2, 2010, regarding Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Company's equity compensation plans:

 
  (a)
Number Of Securities
To Be Issued Upon
Exercise Of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  (b)
Weighted Average
Exercise Price Of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
  (c)
Number Of Securities
Remaining Available For
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders(1)

    82,652,058   $ 11.79     47,739,015  

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders(2)

    38,351,700     13.41     10,129,330  
                 

Totals(3)

    121,003,758     12.30     57,868,345  
                 

(1)
Includes shares issuable or available pursuant to the Company's 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994 Plan"), 2000 Lexar Stock Option Plan (the "2000 Lexar Plan"), 2001 Stock Option Plan (the "2001 Plan"), 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2004 Plan"), 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan") and Numonyx Plan. The 2004 Plan and the 2007 Plan provide for a maximum term for options and SARs of six years, all other Company equity plans provide for a maximum option term of 10 years. The 2004 Plan, the 2007 Plan and the Numonyx Plan are the Company's only plans that permit granting of awards other than stock options. The 2004 Plan and the 2007 Plan provide that awards other than stock options or SARs reduce the number of available shares under the plan by two shares for each one share covered by the award. In addition, none of the Company's equity plans contain provisions that are commonly known as "liberal share counting provisions" or permit the grant of discounted options or SARs.

(2)
Includes shares issuable or available pursuant to the Company's Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "NSOP"), 1997 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"), 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (the "1998 Plan") and the 2002 Employee Inducement Stock Option Plan (the "2002 Plan"). Options granted under the aforementioned plans have terms ranging from six to ten years. The exercise price and the vesting schedule of the options granted under these plans are determined by the administrators of the plans or the Company's Board of Directors. Executive officers and directors do not participate in the aforementioned plans.

(3)
The following table contains further information as to awards outstanding and available for issuance under each of the Company's equity plans.

Equity Plan
  (a)
Number of
Securities Underlying
Outstanding Awards
  (b)
Number of Securities
Available for Issuance
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
 

Approved Plans

             
 

1994 Plan

    14,166,523      
 

2000 Lexar Plan

    1,320,954      
 

2001 Plan

    38,308,298     2,124,340  
 

2004 Plan

    10,893,914 (1)   19,972,621  
 

2007 Plan

    15,515,352 (2)   19,390,738  
 

Numonyx Plan

    2,447,017 (3)   6,251,316  
           
   

Approved Plan Total

    82,652,058     47,739,015  
           

Not Approved Plans

             
 

NSOP

    36,873,783     9,098,700  
 

1997 Plan

    446,849     6,485  
 

1998 Plan

    1,031,068     24,145  
 

2002 Plan

        1,000,000  
           
   

Not Approved Plan Total

    38,351,700     10,129,330  
           
     

Grand Total

    121,003,758     57,868,345  
           

(1)
Includes 399,791 restricted stock units.

(2)
Includes 1,754,054 restricted stock units and 52,999 shares of deferred stock rights.

(3)
All RSUs.

35



CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

        Related party transactions are reviewed by the Company's Board of Directors. Related parties include the Company's directors and officers, their family members and affiliates and beneficial owners. In cases where the related party is a director, that director does not participate in the review of the proposed transaction. In reviewing a proposed related party transaction, the Board considers all the relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction, such as (i) the nature and terms of the transactions, (ii) the dollar value of the transaction, (iii) whether the terms of the transaction are at least as favorable as they would have been if a related party was not involved, (iv) the business reasons for the transaction, (v) whether the transaction would result in an improper conflict of interest and (vi) the effects of the transaction on the ongoing relationship between the Company and the related party.

        During fiscal 2010, the Company paid $55 million to Lam Research Corporation ("Lam") for semiconductor manufacturing equipment and related services. During fiscal 2010, the Company received payments of $121 thousand from Lam for semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Mr. Bagley is the Executive Chairman of Lam.

        During fiscal 2010, the Grove Hotel and Qwest Arena in Boise, Idaho, received approximately $147 thousand for business conducted with the Company. The Company uses the Grove Hotel for business visitors and conferences, and leases a suite for events at the Qwest Arena. Mr. Appleton has an interest in a limited liability company that is a minority owner of the Grove Hotel and Qwest Arena.

        On May 7, 2010 (the "Acquisition Date"), the Company acquired Numonyx Holdings B.V. ("Numonyx") through the issuance of 137.7 million shares of its common stock to, among others, Intel Corporation ("Intel") and STMicroelectronics N.V. ("STMicro"). Through the transaction, both Intel and STMicro became beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company's outstanding common stock. The shares of common stock issued are restricted from sale until after November 6, 2010. In addition, 21.0 million of the shares of stock issued were placed in escrow as partial security for, among others, Intel and STMicro's indemnity obligations. The shares in escrow may be sold after November 6, 2010.

        When Numonyx was formed in 2008, Intel and STMicro contributed existing facilities of which some were located on campuses that continue to be owned and operated by those companies. The acquired Numonyx operations have long-term lease arrangements at those facilities, facilities cost-sharing arrangements and product testing arrangements. Under these arrangements, the Company paid STMicro and Intel $19 million and $1 million, respectively, from the Acquisition Date through the end of fiscal year 2010. Also in connection with the acquisition of Numonyx, the Company received payments from Intel and STMicro of $6 million and $3 million, respectively, for reimbursements under arrangements for facility cost sharing, product design and process development and for sales of equipment from the Acquisition Date through the end of fiscal 2010.

        Concurrent with the Numonyx acquisition, the Company entered into an agreement with STMicro that required the Company to assume, under certain conditions, STMicro's guarantee of an outstanding $250 million loan owed by Hynix-Numonyx Semiconductor Ltd., due in periodic installments from 2014 through 2016. Under the agreements, on August 31, 2010, the conditions for the guarantee were satisfied and the Company deposited $250 million into a pledged account to collateralize the guarantee of the loan.

        The Company has two joint ventures with Intel: IM Flash Technologies, LLC ("IMFT") and IM Flash Singapore LLP ("IMFS") (collectively "IM Flash"), to manufacture NAND Flash memory products. IMFT and IMFS are each governed by a Board of Managers, the number of which adjusts depending on the parties' ownership interest. As of September 2, 2010, the Company owned 51% and Intel owned 49% of IMFT and the Company owned 57% and Intel owned 43% of IMFS. In the first quarter of 2011, the

36


Company contributed $392 million to IMFS and Intel did not make any contribution, increasing the Company's ownership interest in IMFS to 71% and gave it a majority of the seats of the Board of Managers of IMFS. IM Flash's distributions to, and contributions from, Intel were $52 million and $14 million, respectively, from the Acquisition Date through the end of fiscal year 2010.

        IM Flash manufactures NAND Flash memory products using designs the Company developed with Intel. The Company generally shares product designs and other research and development ("R&D") costs equally with Intel under product design and process development agreements. As a result, R&D expenses were reduced by reimbursements from Intel of $32 million for the period from the Acquisition Date through the end of fiscal year 2010. As of September 2, 2010, the Company had a receivable of $30 million from Intel and a payable of $16 million under this agreement.

        IM Flash sells products to the joint venture partners generally in proportion to their ownership interests at long-term negotiated prices approximating cost. IM Flash sales to Intel were $250 million from the Acquisition Date through the end of fiscal year 2010. IM Flash receivables and payables related to Intel were as follows (in millions):

Receivables from Intel:

       
 

Net sales

  $ 128  
 

Product design and process development activities

    30  

Payables to Intel for various services

    2  

        From the Acquisition Date through the end of fiscal year 2010, the Company made payments to Intel of $13 million for purchases of semiconductor products and had cash receipts of $1 million from Intel for sales of DRAM products.


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") requires the Company's directors and executive officers, and persons who own beneficially more than 10% of the Common Stock of the Company, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ. Copies of all filed reports are required to be furnished to the Company pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Based solely on the reports received by the Company and on written representations from reporting persons, the Company believes that with the exception of a Form 4 related to a sale under a 10b5-1 Trading Plan for Mr. Bailey, all directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended September 2, 2010. Mr. Bailey's filing was one day late as a result of an administrative error by the Company.

37



PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

        The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors on October 9, 2007. On October 11, 2010, the Board approved an amendment to the plan to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder from 40,000,000 to 60,000,000 shares, subject to shareholder approval. As of October 18, 2010, there were approximately 21,000 employees and six non-employee directors eligible to participate in the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. Officers are not eligible to participate in the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. On October 18, 2010, the closing price of the Company's Common Stock was $7.53.

        A summary of the plan is set forth below. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the plan, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.

Purpose

        The purpose of the plan is to promote the Company's success by linking the personal interests of its employees, non-employee directors and consultants to those of the Company's shareholders, and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. Officers of the Company are not eligible to participate in the plan.

        Permissible Awards.    The plan authorizes the grant of awards in any of the following forms:

        All awards will be evidenced by a written award certificate between the Company and the participant, which will include such provisions as may be specified by the Committee.

38


Shares Available for Awards

        Subject to adjustment as provided in the plan, and to the shareholders' approval of the proposed plan amendment to increase the plan share reserve, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock reserved and available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the plan is 60,000,000 (including the 20,000,000 shares proposed to be added). The maximum number of shares that may be issued to one person upon exercise of incentive stock options granted under the plan is 2,000,000. Each share issued pursuant to "full value" awards, such as restricted stock, unrestricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, performance shares, or other stock-based awards payable in stock, reduces the number of shares available for grant by two shares.

Limitations on Awards

        The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by options and stock appreciation rights granted under the plan to any one person during any one calendar year is 2,000,000. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted under the plan in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, performance shares or other stock-based awards under the plan to any one person during any one calendar year is 2,000,000.

Administration

        The plan will be administered by the Committee. The Committee will have the authority to designate participants; determine the type or types of awards to be granted to each participant and the number, terms and conditions thereof; establish, adopt or revise any rules and regulations as it may deem advisable to administer the plan; and make all other decisions and determinations that may be required under the plan. The Board of Directors may at any time administer the plan. If it does so, it will have all the powers of the Committee under the plan.

        In September 2008, the Board of Directors created a director compensation sub-plan of the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan for awards to the Company's non-employee directors. Awards granted to the Company's non-employee directors will be made only in accordance with the parameters of the Company's director compensation plan, or any successor program for the compensation of non-employee directors as in effect from time to time. The Committee may not make discretionary grants under the director compensation plan to non-employee directors.

        In addition, the Board or the Committee may expressly delegate to a special committee some or all of the Committee's authority, within specified parameters, to grant awards to eligible participants who, at the time of grant, are not officers.

Deductibility under Section 162(m)

        The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan is designed to comply with Code Section 162(m) so that grants of market-priced options and stock appreciation rights under the plan, and other awards that are conditioned on performance goals as described below, will be excluded from the calculation of annual compensation for purposes of Code Section 162(m) and will be fully deductible. While the Committee believes it is important to preserve the deductibility of compensation under Code Section 162(m) generally, the Board and the Committee reserve the right to grant or approve awards or compensation that is non-deductible.

Performance Goals

        The Committee may designate any award as a qualified performance-based award in order to make the award fully deductible without regard to the $1,000,000 deduction limit imposed by Code Section 162(m). If an award is so designated, the Committee must establish objectively determinable

39



performance goals for the award. Performance goals for such awards shall be based on one or more of the following financial, strategic and operational business criteria:

        In order to meet the requirements of Section 162(m), the Committee must establish such goals within the first 90 days after the beginning of the period for which such performance goal relates (or such other time as may be required or permitted under applicable tax regulations) and the Committee may not increase any award or, except in the case of death, disability or a change in control of the Company, waive the achievement of any specified goal.

        The Committee may determine that any evaluation of performance will include, exclude or otherwise equitably adjust for unusual and non-recurring financial events such as asset write-downs or impairment charges; litigation or claim judgments or settlements; the effect of changes in tax laws or accounting principles affecting reported results; accruals for reorganization and restructuring programs; extraordinary nonrecurring items meriting special accounting treatment, as determined under generally accepted accounting principles; acquisitions or divestitures; and foreign exchange gains and losses. However, in order to meet the requirements of Section 162(m), in the event the Committee determines to include or exclude such unusual and nonrecurring events when measuring actual results, it must do so within the first 90 days after the beginning of the period for which such performance goal relates (or such other time as may be required or permitted under applicable tax regulations). Any payment of an award granted with performance goals will be conditioned on the written certification of the Committee in each case that the performance goals and any other material conditions were satisfied.

Limitations on Transfer; Beneficiaries

        No award will be assignable or transferable by a participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or (except in the case of an incentive stock option) pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order; provided, however, that the Committee may permit other transfers where the Committee

40



concludes that such transferability does not result in accelerated taxation, does not cause any option intended to be an incentive stock option to fail to qualify as such, and is otherwise appropriate and desirable, taking into account any factors deemed relevant, including without limitation, any state or federal tax or securities laws or regulations applicable to transferable awards. A participant may, in the manner determined by the Committee, designate a beneficiary to exercise the rights of the participant and to receive any distribution with respect to any award upon the participant's death.

Acceleration Upon Certain Events

        Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate or other governing document, upon the occurrence of a "change in control" of the Company (as defined in the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan), all outstanding options, stock appreciation rights and other awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised will become fully exercisable, all time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding awards will lapse, all outstanding performance-based awards will be fully earned based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at "target" levels and there will be a pro-rata payout of such performance awards based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the change in control.

        Unless otherwise provided in an award certificate or other governing document, if a participant's service terminates by reason of death or disability, all of such participant's outstanding options, stock appreciation rights and other awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised will become fully vested and exercisable, all time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding awards will lapse, all outstanding performance-based awards will be fully earned based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at "target" levels and there will be a pro-rata payout of such performance awards based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the termination of service. In addition, the Committee may in its discretion accelerate awards for any other reason; provided, however, that the Committee shall not exercise such discretion with respect to restricted stock or restricted stock units that in the aggregate exceed 5% of the shares available for issuance under the plan (excluding from this calculation restricted shares or restricted stock units granted to non-employee directors or accelerations of vesting upon a change in control or other corporate transaction or restructuring, or a participant's termination of employment or separation from service resulting from death or disability or for the convenience or in the bests interests of the Company). The Committee may discriminate among participants or among awards in exercising such discretion.

Adjustments

        In the event of a stock split, a dividend payable in shares of Common Stock, a spin-off, an extraordinary cash dividend, a combination or consolidation of the Common Stock into a lesser number of shares, or another equity restructuring that causes the per-share value of the Common Stock to change, the share authorization limits under the plan will automatically be adjusted proportionately, and the shares then subject to each award will automatically be adjusted proportionately without any change in the aggregate purchase price for such award. If the Company is involved in another corporate transaction or event that affects the Common Stock, such as a recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation, the Committee may adjust outstanding awards to preserve the benefits or potential benefits of the awards.

Termination and Amendment

        The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by the Company's Board of Directors in October 2007 and was submitted to the Company's shareholders at the 2008 Annual Meeting. The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan has a term of ten years, unless earlier terminated by the Board or the Committee. The Board or the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, terminate or amend the plan, but if an amendment to the plan would materially increase the number of shares of stock issuable under the plan, expand the types of awards provided under the plan, materially expand the class of participants eligible to participate in the

41



plan, materially extend the term of the plan or otherwise constitute a material amendment requiring shareholder approval under applicable listing requirements, laws, policies or regulations, then such amendment will be subject to shareholder approval. No termination or amendment of the plan may adversely affect any award previously granted under the plan without the written consent of the participant.

        The Committee may amend or terminate outstanding awards. However, such amendments may require the consent of the participant and, unless approved by the shareholders or otherwise permitted by the anti-dilution provisions of the plan, the exercise price of an outstanding option may not be reduced, directly or indirectly, and the original term of an option may not be extended.

Prohibition on Repricing

        As indicated above under "Termination and Amendment," outstanding stock options and SARs cannot be repriced, directly or indirectly, without the prior consent of the Company's shareholders. The exchange of an "underwater" option (i.e., an option having an exercise price in excess of the current market value of the underling stock) for another award would be considered an indirect repricing and would, therefore, require the prior consent of the Company's shareholders.

Certain Federal Tax Effects

        The following discussion is limited to a summary of the U.S. federal income tax provisions relating to the grant, exercise and vesting of awards under the plan and the subsequent sale of Common Stock acquired under the plan. The tax consequences of awards may vary according to country of participation. Also, the tax consequences of the grant, exercise or vesting of awards vary depending upon the particular circumstances, and it should be noted that the income tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof change frequently. Participants should rely upon their own tax advisors for advice concerning the specific tax consequences applicable to them, including the applicability and effect of state, local, and foreign tax laws.

        Nonstatutory Stock Options.    There will be no federal income tax consequences to the optionee or to the Company upon the grant of a nonstatutory stock option under the plan. When the optionee exercises a nonstatutory option, however, he or she will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock received upon exercise of the option at the time of exercise over the exercise price, and the Company will be allowed a corresponding deduction. Any gain that the optionee realizes when he or she later sells or disposes of the option shares will be short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on how long the shares were held.

        Incentive Stock Options.    There typically will be no federal income tax consequences to the optionee or to the Company upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If the optionee holds the option shares for the required holding period of at least two years after the date the option was granted and one year after exercise, the difference between the exercise price and the amount realized upon sale or disposition of the option shares will be long-term capital gain or loss, and the Company will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction. If the optionee disposes of the option shares in a sale, exchange, or other disqualifying disposition before the required holding period ends, he or she will recognize taxable ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the option shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price, and the Company will be allowed a federal income tax deduction equal to such amount. While the exercise of an incentive stock option does not result in current taxable income, the excess of the fair market value of the option shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price will be an item of adjustment for purposes of determining the optionee's alternative minimum taxable income.

        Stock Appreciation Rights.    A participant receiving a stock appreciation right will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time the award is granted. When the participant exercises the stock appreciation right, the amount of cash and the fair market value of any

42



shares of Common Stock received will be ordinary income to the participant and the Company will be allowed as a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time.

        Restricted Stock.    Unless a participant makes an election to accelerate recognition of the income to the date of grant as described below, the participant will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a restricted stock award is granted, provided that the award is subject to restrictions on transfer and is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. When the restrictions lapse, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock as of that date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m). If the participant files an election under Code Section 83(b) within 30 days after the date of grant of the restricted stock, he or she will recognize ordinary income as of the date of grant equal to the fair market value of the stock as of that date (less any amount paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m). Any future appreciation in the stock will be taxable to the participant at capital gains rates. However, if the stock is later forfeited, the participant will not be able to recover the tax previously paid pursuant to the Code Section 83(b) election.

        Restricted Stock Units.    A participant will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a restricted stock unit award is granted. Upon issuance of shares of Common Stock in settlement of a restricted stock unit award, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock as of that date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m).

        Deferred Stock Units.    A participant will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a deferred stock unit award is granted. Upon issuance of shares of Common Stock in settlement of a deferred stock unit award, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock as of that date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock), and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m).

        Performance Shares.    A participant generally will not recognize income, and the Company will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time performance shares are granted. When the participant receives settlement of the award, the fair market value of the shares of stock (or cash payment) will be ordinary income to the participant, and the Company will be allowed a corresponding federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to any applicable limitations under Code Section 162(m).

        Code Section 409A.    The plan permits the grant of various types of incentive awards, which may or may not be exempt from Code Section 409A. If an award is subject to Section 409A, and if the requirements of Section 409A are not met, the taxable events as described above could apply earlier than described, and could result in the imposition of additional taxes and penalties. Restricted stock awards, and stock options and stock appreciation rights that comply with the terms of the plan are designed to be exempt from the application of Code Section 409A. Restricted stock units, deferred stock units and performance shares granted under the plan would be subject to Section 409A unless they are designed to satisfy the short-term deferral exemption from such law. If not exempt, such awards must be specially designed to meet the requirements of Section 409A in order to avoid early taxation and penalties.

Vote Required

        Approval of the amendment to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock that are represented in person or by proxy at the 2010 Annual Meeting. If the amendment to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan is approved by the shareholders, it will be effective as of the date of the 2010 Annual Meeting. If shareholders do not approve the amendment to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, it will not become effective.

        The Board of Directors recommends voting "FOR" approval of the amendment to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

43



PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

        The Audit Committee of the Board has retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending September 1, 2011. PwC and its predecessor, Coopers and Lybrand LLP, have been the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm since fiscal 1985. If the ratification of PwC's appointment is not approved by a majority of the shares voting thereon, the Audit Committee may reconsider its decision to appoint PwC as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

        The Board of Directors recommends voting "FOR" the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Fees Paid

        Fees charged to the Company for services performed by PwC for fiscal 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

 
  2010   2009  
 
  (amounts in
millions)

 

Audit fees(1)

  $ 6.2   $ 4.0  

Audit-related fees(2)

    0.5     1.5  

Tax fees

         

All other fees(3)

    0.9      
           

  $ 7.6   $ 5.5  
           

(1)
Includes fees related to the audit of the Company's financial statements, fees for services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and fees for attestation services related to the Company's internal control over financial reporting as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(2)
For fiscal 2010, primarily reflects fees for due diligence matters in connection with the acquisition of Numonyx and Transform Solar Pty Limited and audits of supply arrangements. For fiscal 2009, primarily reflects fees for audits of supply arrangements, audits of carve-out financial statements in connection with the Company's sale of a 65% interest in Aptina Imaging, due diligence in connection with the Company's activities related to mergers and acquisitions and consultation concerning the application of financial accounting standards in connection with the Company's partnering arrangements.

(3)
Primarily reflects fees for Numonyx integration support services provided in connection with the acquisition of Numonyx.

Pre-Approval Policy

        The Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee will pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to the Company by the independent auditors, except for such de minimis non-audit services for which the pre-approved requirements are waived in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available on the Company's website at www.micron.com. In fiscal 2010 and 2009, all audit and non-audit services provided by PwC were approved by the Audit Committee in advance of services being provided.

44


Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

        This report has been prepared by members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors who served on the Audit Committee at the end of fiscal 2010. The Board of Directors determined that each committee member qualified as an "audit committee financial expert" for purposes of the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board of Directors also determined that during their period of service on the Audit Committee, each member satisfied the independence requirements of applicable federal laws and the Listing Rules of NASDAQ.

        The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in overseeing and monitoring (i) the integrity of the Company's financial statements, (ii) the performance of the Company's internal audit function, (iii) the performance of the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, (iv) the qualifications and independence of the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and (v) the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

        The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements with the Company's management, which has primary responsibility for such financial statements. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC"), the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for fiscal 2010, has expressed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K its opinion as to the conformity of the Company's consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Audit Committee has discussed with PwC the matters that are required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Professional Standards, Volume 1, AU Section 380). PwC has provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Accounting Oversight Board, and the Audit Committee discussed with PwC its independence. The Audit Committee also concluded that PwC's provision of non-audit services to the Company, as described above, is compatible with PwC's independence.

        On the basis of the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that they approve the inclusion of the Company's audited consolidated financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2010; appointed PwC as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company for the Company's fiscal year ending September 1, 2011, and approved and authorized PwC to carry out and perform certain specified non-audit services for the Company in fiscal 2011.

        While the Audit Committee has performed the above functions, management, and not the Audit Committee, has the primary responsibility for (i) preparing the Company's consolidated financial statements and for the reporting process in general, and (ii) establishing and maintaining internal controls. Similarly, it is the responsibility of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and not the Audit Committee, to conduct the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements and express an opinion as to the conformity of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

    The Audit Committee
Robert L. Bailey
Mercedes Johnson
Robert E. Switz

45



NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on December 16, 2010. The Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxydocs.com/mu.

        As permitted by rules recently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are making our proxy material available to our shareholders electronically via the Internet. We have mailed many of our shareholders a Notice containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K and vote online. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and Annual Report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your voting instructions over the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.


HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY STATEMENTS AND ANNUAL REPORTS

        The Company is allowed and intends to deliver only one copy of the notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials or set of one Annual Report on Form 10-K and one Proxy Statement to multiple registered shareholders sharing an address who have received prior notice of our intent to deliver such notice or report and proxy statement per address, so long as the Company has not received contrary instructions from one or more of such shareholders. This practice is commonly referred to as "householding." Householding reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and the cost to the Company of preparing and mailing duplicate materials.

        If you share an address with other registered shareholders and your household receives one copy of the notice of Internet availability or of this Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and you decide you want a separate copy of this Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K through the date of the Annual Meeting, we will promptly deliver your separate copy if you contact us at Micron Technology, Inc., Attn.: Corporate Secretary, P.O. Box 6, MS-1-507, Boise, Idaho 83707-0006 or corporatesecretary@micron.com or (208) 368-4500. Additionally, to resume the mailing of individual copies of future annual reports, proxy statements, proxy statements combined with a prospectus, and information statements to a particular shareholder, you may contact Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Attn.: Householding, P.O. Box 64854, St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0854 or at (800) 347-8625 and your request will be effective within 30 days after receipt. After the Annual Meeting, you may request householding of these documents by providing Wells Fargo Bank at the address provided directly above with a written request to eliminate multiple mailings. The written request must include names and account numbers of all shareholders consenting to householding for a given address and must be signed by those shareholders.

        Additionally, the Company has been notified that certain banks, brokers and other nominees will household the Company's annual reports and proxy statements for shareholders who hold in street names and have consented to householding. In this case, you may request an individual copy of this Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K by contacting your bank, broker or other nominee.


DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2011 ANNUAL MEETING

        Proposals of shareholders of the Company which are intended to be presented at the Company's 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices located at 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632, no later than June 30, 2011, and must also be in compliance with the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and its Bylaws and with applicable laws and regulations in order to be included in the Proxy Statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. Proposals which are received after June 30, 2011, will be untimely and will not be considered at the meeting.

        November 5, 2010

    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

46



APPENDIX A

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

ARTICLE 1
PURPOSE

        1.1.    GENERAL.    The purpose of the Micron Technology, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is to promote the success, and enhance the value, of Micron Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), by linking the personal interests of employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company or any Affiliate (as defined below) to those of Company stockholders and by providing such persons with an incentive for outstanding performance. The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of employees, non-employee directors and consultants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of the Company's operation is largely dependent. Accordingly, the Plan permits the grant of incentive awards from time to time to selected employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company and its Affiliates; provided, however, that no officer, including without limitation the chief executive officer of the Company, is eligible to be a Participant in the Plan.

ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS

        2.1.    DEFINITIONS.    When a word or phrase appears in this Plan with the initial letter capitalized, and the word or phrase does not commence a sentence, the word or phrase shall generally be given the meaning ascribed to it in this Section or in Section 1.1 unless a clearly different meaning is required by the context. The following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:


A-2


A-3


A-4


ARTICLE 3
EFFECTIVE TERM OF PLAN

        3.1.    EFFECTIVE DATE.    The Plan shall be effective as of the date it is approved by both the Board and the stockholders of the Company (the "Effective Date").

        3.2.    TERMINATION OF PLAN.    The Plan shall terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date unless earlier terminated as provided herein, which shall continue to be governed by the applicable terms and conditions of this Plan. The termination of the Plan on such date shall not affect the validity of any Award outstanding on the date of termination. No Incentive Stock Options may be granted more than ten years after the earlier of (a) adoption of this Plan by the Board, or (b) the Effective Date.

ARTICLE 4
ADMINISTRATION

        4.1.    COMMITTEE.    The Plan shall be administered by a Committee appointed by the Board (which Committee shall consist of at least two directors) or, at the discretion of the Board from time to time, the Plan may be administered by the Board. It is intended that at least two of the directors appointed to serve on the Committee shall be "non-employee directors" (within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the 1934 Act) and "outside directors" (within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)) and that any such members of the Committee who do not so qualify shall abstain from participating in any decision to make or administer Awards that are made to Eligible Participants who at the time of consideration for such Award (i) are persons subject to the short-swing profit rules of Section 16 of the 1934 Act, or (ii) are reasonably anticipated to become Covered Employees during the term of the Award. However, the mere fact that a Committee member shall fail to qualify under either of the foregoing requirements or shall fail to abstain from such action shall not invalidate any Award made by the Committee which Award is otherwise validly made under the Plan. The members of the Committee shall be appointed by, and may be changed at any time and from time to time in the discretion of, the Board.

A-5


The Board may reserve to itself any or all of the authority and responsibility of the Committee under the Plan or may act as administrator of the Plan for any and all purposes. To the extent the Board has reserved any authority and responsibility or during any time that the Board is acting as administrator of the Plan, it shall have all the powers of the Committee hereunder, and any reference herein to the Committee (other than in this Section 4.1) shall include the Board. To the extent any action of the Board under the Plan conflicts with actions taken by the Committee, the actions of the Board shall control.

        4.2.    ACTION AND INTERPRETATIONS BY THE COMMITTEE.    For purposes of administering the Plan, the Committee may from time to time adopt rules, regulations, guidelines and procedures for carrying out the provisions and purposes of the Plan and make such other determinations, not inconsistent with the Plan, as the Committee may deem appropriate. The Committee's interpretation of the Plan, any Awards granted under the Plan, any Award Certificate and all decisions and determinations by the Committee with respect to the Plan are final, binding, and conclusive on all parties. Each member of the Committee is entitled to, in good faith, rely or act upon any report or other information furnished to that member by any officer or other employee of the Company or any Affiliate, the Company's or an Affiliate's independent certified public accountants, Company counsel or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained by the Company to assist in the administration of the Plan.

        4.3.    AUTHORITY OF COMMITTEE.    Except as provided below, the Committee has the exclusive power, authority and discretion to:

A-6


        Notwithstanding the foregoing, grants of Awards to Non-Employee Directors hereunder shall be made only in accordance with the terms, conditions and parameters of a plan, program or policy for the compensation of Non-Employee Directors as in effect from time to time, and the Committee may not make discretionary grants hereunder to Non-Employee Directors.

        Notwithstanding the above, the Board may, by resolution, expressly delegate to a special committee, consisting of one or more directors who may but need not be officers of the Company, the authority, within specified parameters, to (i) designate officers, employees and/or consultants of the Company or any of its Affiliates to be recipients of Awards under the Plan, and (ii) to determine the number of such Awards to be received by any such Participants; provided, however, that such delegation of duties and responsibilities to an officer of the Company may not be made with respect to the grant of Awards to eligible participants (a) who are subject to Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act at the Grant Date, or (b) who as of the Grant Date are reasonably anticipated to be become Covered Employees during the term of the Award. The acts of such delegates shall be treated hereunder as acts of the Board and such delegates shall report regularly to the Board and the Compensation Committee regarding the delegated duties and responsibilities and any Awards so granted.

        4.4.    AWARD CERTIFICATES.    Each Award shall be evidenced by an Award Certificate. Each Award Certificate shall include such provisions, not inconsistent with the Plan, as may be specified by the Committee.

ARTICLE 5
SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN

        5.1.    NUMBER OF SHARES.    Subject to adjustment as provided in Sections 5.2 and 15.1, the aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 60,000,000; provided, however, that each Share issued under the Plan pursuant to a Full Value Award shall reduce the number of available Shares by two (2) shares. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued upon exercise of Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan shall be 2,000,000.

        5.2.    SHARE COUNTING.    Shares covered by an Award shall be subtracted from the Plan share reserve as of the date of grant, but shall be added back to the Plan share reserve in accordance with this Section 5.2.

        5.3.    STOCK DISTRIBUTED.    Any Stock distributed pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued Stock, treasury Stock or Stock purchased on the open market.

        5.4.    LIMITATION ON AWARDS.    Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary (but subject to adjustment as provided in Section 15.1), the maximum number of Shares with respect to one or more Options and/or SARs that may be granted during any one calendar year under the Plan to any one

A-7



Participant shall be 2,000,000. The maximum aggregate grant with respect to Awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Deferred Stock Units, Performance Shares or other Stock-Based Awards (other than Options or SARs) granted in any one calendar year to any one Participant shall be 2,000,000.

ARTICLE 6
ELIGIBILITY

        6.1.    GENERAL.    Awards may be granted only to Eligible Participants; except that Incentive Stock Options may be granted to only to Eligible Participants who are employees of the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary as defined in Section 424(e) and (f) of the Code. Eligible Participants who are service providers to an Affiliate may be granted Options or SARs under this Plan only if the Affiliate qualifies as an "eligible issuer of service recipient stock" within the meaning of §1.409A-1(b)(5)(iii)(E) of the final regulations under Code Section 409A.

ARTICLE 7
STOCK OPTIONS

        7.1.    GENERAL.    The Committee is authorized to grant Options to Participants on the following terms and conditions:

        7.2.    INCENTIVE STOCK OPTIONS.    The terms of any Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan must comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. If all of the requirements of Section 422 of the Code are not met, the Option shall automatically become a Nonstatutory Stock Option.

A-8


ARTICLE 8
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

        8.1.    GRANT OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS.    The Committee is authorized to grant Stock Appreciation Rights to Participants on the following terms and conditions:

ARTICLE 9
PERFORMANCE SHARES

        9.1.    GRANT OF PERFORMANCE SHARES.    The Committee is authorized to grant Performance Shares to Participants on such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Committee. The Committee shall have the complete discretion to determine the number of Performance Shares granted to each Participant, subject to Section 5.4, and to designate the provisions of such Performance Shares as provided in Section 4.3. All Performance Shares shall be evidenced by an Award Certificate or a written program established by the Committee, pursuant to which Performance Shares are awarded under the Plan under uniform terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in such written program.

        9.2.    PERFORMANCE GOALS.    The Committee may establish performance goals for Performance Shares which may be based on any criteria selected by the Committee. Such performance goals may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives or in terms of objectives that relate to the performance of the Participant, an Affiliate or a division, region, department or function within the Company or an Affiliate. If the Committee determines that a change in the business, operations, corporate structure or capital structure of the Company or the manner in which the Company or an Affiliate conducts its business, or other events or circumstances render performance goals to be unsuitable, the Committee may modify such performance goals in whole or in part, as the Committee deems appropriate. If a Participant is promoted, demoted or transferred to a different business unit or function during a performance period, the Committee may determine that the performance goals or performance period are no longer appropriate and may (i) adjust, change or eliminate the performance goals or the applicable performance period as it deems appropriate to make such goals and period comparable to the initial goals and period, or (ii) make a cash payment to the participant in amount determined by the Committee. The foregoing two

A-9



sentences shall not apply with respect to an Award of Performance Shares that is intended to be a Qualified Performance-Based Award.

        9.3.    RIGHT TO PAYMENT.    The grant of a Performance Share to a Participant will entitle the Participant to receive at a specified later time a specified number of Shares, or the equivalent value in cash or other property, if the performance goals established by the Committee are achieved and the other terms and conditions thereof are satisfied. The Committee shall set performance goals and other terms or conditions to payment of the Performance Shares in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number of the Performance Shares that will be earned by the Participant.

        9.4.    OTHER TERMS.    Performance Shares may be payable in cash, Stock, or other property, and have such other terms and conditions as determined by the Committee and reflected in the Award Certificate.

ARTICLE 10
RESTRICTED STOCK AND RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS

        10.1.    GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK AND RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS.    Subject to the terms and conditions of this Article 10, the Committee is authorized to make Awards of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Committee. An Award of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall be evidenced by an Award Certificate setting forth the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to the Award.

        10.2.    ISSUANCE AND RESTRICTIONS.    Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as the Committee may impose (including, without limitation, limitations on the right to vote Restricted Stock or the right to receive dividends on the Restricted Stock); provided, however, at a minimum, all Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 14.4 for a period of no less than (a) one year from the date of award with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units subject to restrictions that lapse based upon satisfaction of performance goals, and (b) three years from the date of award with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units subject to time-based restrictions that lapse based upon one's Continuous Status as a Participant. For avoidance of doubt, nothing in the foregoing shall preclude any applicable restriction, including those set forth in Section 14.4 hereof, from lapsing ratably, including, but not limited to, roughly annual increments over three years, with respect to the Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units referred to in Section 10.2(b). Moreover, nothing in the foregoing shall preclude or be interpreted to preclude Awards to Non-employee Directors from containing a period of restriction shorter than that set forth above. Finally, nothing in this Section 10.2 shall be deemed or interpreted to preclude the waiver, lapse or the acceleration of lapse, of any restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units in accordance with or as permitted by Sections 14.7 through Section 14.9, respectively, Article 15 or any other provision of the Plan. Subject to the remaining terms and conditions of the Plan, these restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such times, under such circumstances, in such installments, upon the satisfaction of performance goals or otherwise, as the Committee determines at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in an Award Certificate or any special Plan document governing an Award, the Participant shall have all of the rights of a stockholder with respect to the Restricted Stock, and the Participant shall have none of the rights of a stockholder with respect to Restricted Stock Units until such time as Shares of Stock are paid in settlement of the Restricted Stock Units.

        10.3.    FORFEITURE.    Except as otherwise determined by the Committee at the time of the grant of the Award or thereafter, upon termination of Continuous Status as a Participant during the applicable restriction period or upon failure to satisfy a performance goal during the applicable restriction period, Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units that are at that time subject to restrictions shall be forfeited; provided, however, that the Committee may provide in any Award Certificate, subject to the terms and

A-10



conditions of the Plan, that restrictions or forfeiture conditions relating to Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units will be waived in whole or in part in the event of terminations resulting from specified causes, including, but not limited to, death, Disability, or for the convenience or in the best interests of the Company.

        10.4.    DELIVERY OF RESTRICTED STOCK.    Shares of Restricted Stock shall be delivered to the Participant at the time of grant either by book-entry registration or by delivering to the Participant, or a custodian or escrow agent (including, without limitation, the Company or one or more of its employees) designated by the Committee, a stock certificate or certificates registered in the name of the Participant. If physical certificates representing shares of Restricted Stock are registered in the name of the Participant, such certificates must bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.

ARTICLE 11
DEFERRED STOCK UNITS

        11.1.    GRANT OF DEFERRED STOCK UNITS.    The Committee is authorized to grant Deferred Stock Units to Participants subject to such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Committee. Deferred Stock Units shall entitle the Participant to receive Shares of Stock (or the equivalent value in cash or other property if so determined by the Committee) at a future time as determined by the Committee, or as determined by the Participant within guidelines established by the Committee in the case of voluntary deferral elections. An Award of Deferred Stock Units shall be evidenced by an Award Certificate setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to the Award.

ARTICLE 12
DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS

        12.1.    GRANT OF DIVIDEND EQUIVALENTS.    The Committee is authorized to grant Dividend Equivalents to Participants subject to such terms and conditions as may be selected by the Committee. Dividend Equivalents shall entitle the Participant to receive payments equal to dividends with respect to all or a portion of the number of Shares subject to an Award, as determined by the Committee. The Committee may provide that Dividend Equivalents be paid or distributed when accrued or be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares, or otherwise reinvested. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Certificate, Dividend Equivalents will be paid or distributed no later than the 15th day of the 3rd month following the later of (i) the calendar year in which the corresponding dividends were paid to shareholders, or (ii) the first calendar year in which the Participant's right to such Dividends Equivalents is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

ARTICLE 13
STOCK OR OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS

        13.1.    GRANT OF STOCK OR OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS.    The Committee is authorized, subject to limitations under applicable law, to grant to Participants such other Awards that are payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to Shares, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan, including without limitation Shares awarded purely as a "bonus" and not subject to any restrictions or conditions, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into Shares, and Awards valued by reference to book value of Shares or the value of securities of or the performance of specified Parents or Subsidiaries. The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards.

A-11


ARTICLE 14
PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO AWARDS

        14.1.    STAND-ALONE AND TANDEM AWARDS.    Awards granted under the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone or in addition to, in tandem with, any other Award granted under the Plan. Subject to Section 16.2, awards granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards may be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other Awards.

        14.2.    TERM OF AWARD.    The term of each Award shall be for the period as determined by the Committee, provided that in no event shall the term of any Incentive Stock Option or a Stock Appreciation Right granted in tandem with the Incentive Stock Option exceed a period of ten years from its Grant Date.

        14.3.    FORM OF PAYMENT FOR AWARDS.    Subject to the terms of the Plan and any applicable law or Award Certificate, payments or transfers to be made by the Company or an Affiliate on the grant or exercise of an Award may be made in such form as the Committee determines at or after the Grant Date, including without limitation, cash, Stock, other Awards, or other property, or any combination, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or (except with respect to Options or SARs) on a deferred basis, in each case determined in accordance with rules adopted by, and at the discretion of, the Committee.

        14.4.    LIMITS ON TRANSFER.    No right or interest of a Participant in any unexercised or restricted Award may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other than the Company or an Affiliate, or shall be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability of such Participant to any other party other than the Company or an Affiliate. No unexercised or restricted Award shall be assignable or transferable by a Participant other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or, except in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, pursuant to a domestic relations order that would satisfy Section 414(p)(1)(A) of the Code if such Section applied to an Award under the Plan; provided, however, that the Committee may (but need not) permit other transfers where the Committee concludes that such transferability (i) does not result in accelerated taxation, (ii) does not cause any Option intended to be an Incentive Stock Option to fail to be described in Code Section 422(b), and (iii) is otherwise appropriate and desirable, taking into account any factors deemed relevant, including without limitation, state or federal tax or securities laws applicable to transferable Awards.

        14.5.    BENEFICIARIES.    Notwithstanding Section 14.4, a Participant may, in the manner determined by the Committee, designate a beneficiary to exercise the rights of the Participant and to receive any distribution with respect to any Award upon the Participant's death. A beneficiary, legal guardian, legal representative, or other person claiming any rights under the Plan is subject to all terms and conditions of the Plan and any Award Certificate applicable to the Participant, except to the extent the Plan and Award Certificate otherwise provide, and to any additional restrictions deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee. If no beneficiary has been designated or survives the Participant, payment shall be made to the Participant's estate. Subject to the foregoing, a beneficiary designation may be changed or revoked by a Participant at any time provided the change or revocation is filed with the Committee.

        14.6.    STOCK TRADING RESTRICTIONS.    All Stock issuable under the Plan is subject to any stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Committee deems necessary or advisable to comply with federal or state securities laws, rules and regulations and the rules of any national securities exchange or automated quotation system on which the Stock is listed, quoted, or traded. The Committee may place legends on any Stock certificate or issue instructions to the transfer agent to reference restrictions applicable to the Stock.

        14.7.    ACCELERATION UPON A CHANGE IN CONTROL.    Except as otherwise provided in the Award Certificate or any special Plan document governing an Award, upon the occurrence of a Change in

A-12



Control, all outstanding Options, SARs, and other Awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised shall become fully exercisable, and all time-based vesting restrictions on outstanding Awards shall lapse. Except as otherwise provided in the Award Certificate or any special Plan document governing an Award, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, the target payout opportunities attainable under all outstanding performance-based Awards shall be deemed to have been fully earned as of the effective date of the Change in Control based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at the "target" level and there shall be prorata payout to Participants within thirty (30) days following the effective date of the Change in Control (or any later date required by Section 17.3 of the Plan) based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the Change in Control.

        14.8.    ACCELERATION UPON DEATH OR DISABILITY.    Except as otherwise provided in the Award Certificate or any special Plan document governing an Award, upon the Participant's death or Disability during his or her Continuous Status as a Participant, (i) all of such Participant's outstanding Options, SARs, and other Awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised shall become fully exercisable, (ii) all time-based vesting restrictions on the Participant's outstanding Awards shall lapse, and (iii) the target payout opportunities attainable under all of such Participant's outstanding performance-based Awards shall be deemed to have been fully earned as of the date of termination based upon an assumed achievement of all relevant performance goals at the "target" level and there shall be a prorata payout to the Participant or his or her estate within thirty (30) days following the date of termination (or any later date required by Section 17.3 of the Plan) based upon the length of time within the performance period that has elapsed prior to the date of termination. Any Awards shall thereafter continue or lapse in accordance with the other provisions of the Plan and the Awards Certificate. To the extent that this provision causes Incentive Stock Options to exceed the dollar limitation set forth in Code Section 422(d), the excess Options shall be deemed to be Nonstatutory Stock Options.

        14.9.    ACCELERATION FOR ANY OTHER REASON.    Regardless of whether an event has occurred as described in Section 14.7 or 14.8 above, and subject to Section 14.11 as to Qualified Performance-Based Awards, the Committee may in its sole discretion at any time determine that all or a portion of a Participant's Options, SARs, and other Awards in the nature of rights that may be exercised shall become fully or partially exercisable, that all or a part of the time-based vesting restrictions on all or a portion of the outstanding Awards shall lapse, and/or that any performance-based criteria with respect to any Awards shall be deemed to be wholly or partially satisfied, in each case, as of such date as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, declare; provided, however, the Committee shall not exercise such discretion with respect to Full Value Awards comprised of Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units which, in the aggregate, exceed five percent (5%) of the aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan; provided, further, that when calculating whether the five percent (5%) maximum has been reached, the Committee shall not count or consider any Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units granted to Non-Employee Directors or regarding which the Committee accelerated vesting rights, waived restrictions or determined performance-based criteria had been satisfied resulting from an event described in Section 14.7, Article 15, a Participant's termination of employment or separation from service resulting from death, Disability or for the convenience or in the bests interests of the Company. The Committee may discriminate among Participants and among Awards granted to a Participant in exercising its discretion pursuant to this Section 14.9.

        14.10.    EFFECT OF ACCELERATION.    If an Award is accelerated under Section 14.7, Section 14.8 or Section 14.9, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide (i) that the Award will expire after a designated period of time after such acceleration to the extent not then exercised, (ii) that the Award will be settled in cash rather than Stock, (iii) that the Award will be assumed by another party to a transaction giving rise to the acceleration or otherwise be equitably converted or substituted in connection with such transaction, (iv) that the Award may be settled by payment in cash or cash equivalents equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the underlying Stock, as of a specified date associated with the transaction,

A-13



over the exercise price of the Award, or (v) any combination of the foregoing. The Committee's determination need not be uniform and may be different for different Participants whether or not such Participants are similarly situated. To the extent that such acceleration causes Incentive Stock Options to exceed the dollar limitation set forth in Code Section 422(d), the excess Options shall be deemed to be Nonstatutory Stock Options.

        14.11.  QUALIFIED PERFORMANCE-BASED AWARDS.

A-14


A-15


        14.12.    TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.    Whether military, government or other service or other leave of absence shall constitute a termination of employment shall be determined in each case by the Committee at its discretion, and any determination by the Committee shall be final and conclusive. A Participant's Continuous Status as a Participant shall not be deemed to terminate (i) in a circumstance in which a Participant transfers from the Company to an Affiliate, transfers from an Affiliate to the Company, or transfers from one Affiliate to another Affiliate, or (ii) in the discretion of the Committee as specified at or prior to such occurrence, in the case of a spin-off, sale or disposition of the Participant's employer from the Company or any Affiliate. To the extent that this provision causes Incentive Stock Options to extend beyond three months from the date a Participant is deemed to be an employee of the Company, a Parent or Subsidiary for purposes of Sections 424(e) and 424(f) of the Code, the Options held by such Participant shall be deemed to be Nonstatutory Stock Options.

        14.13.    FORFEITURE EVENTS.    The Committee may specify in an Award Certificate that the Participant's rights, payments and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Such events shall include, but shall not be limited to, termination of employment for cause, violation of material Company or Affiliate policies, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality or other restrictive covenants that may apply to the Participant, or other conduct by the Participant that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company or any Affiliate.

        14.14.    SUBSTITUTE AWARDS.    The Committee may grant Awards under the Plan in substitution for stock and stock-based awards held by employees of another entity who become employees of the Company or an Affiliate as a result of a merger or consolidation of the former employing entity with the Company or an Affiliate or the acquisition by the Company or an Affiliate of property or stock of the former employing corporation. The Committee may direct that the substitute awards be granted on such terms and conditions as the Committee considers appropriate in the circumstances.

ARTICLE 15
CHANGES IN CAPITAL STRUCTURE

        15.1.    MANDATORY ADJUSTMENTS.    In the event of a nonreciprocal transaction between the Company and its stockholders that causes the per-share value of the Stock to change (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, rights offering, or large nonrecurring cash dividend), the authorization limits under Section 5.1 and 5.4 shall be adjusted proportionately, and the Committee shall make such adjustments to the Plan and Awards as it deems necessary, in its sole discretion, to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights immediately resulting from such transaction. Action by the Committee may include: (i) adjustment of the number and kind of shares that may be delivered under the Plan; (ii) adjustment of the number and kind of shares subject to outstanding Awards; (iii) adjustment of the exercise price of outstanding Awards or the measure to be used to determine the amount of the benefit

A-16


payable on an Award; and (iv) any other adjustments that the Committee determines to be equitable. Without limiting the foregoing, in the event of a subdivision of the outstanding Stock (stock-split), a declaration of a dividend payable in Shares, or a combination or consolidation of the outstanding Stock into a lesser number of Shares, the authorization limits under Section 5.1 and 5.4 shall automatically be adjusted proportionately, and the Shares then subject to each Award shall automatically, without the necessity for any additional action by the Committee, be adjusted proportionately without any change in the aggregate purchase price therefor.

        15.2.    DISCRETIONARY ADJUSTMENTS.    Upon the occurrence or in anticipation of any corporate event or transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any merger, reorganization, recapitalization, combination or exchange of shares, or any transaction described in Section 15.1), the Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide (i) that Awards will be settled in cash rather than Stock, (ii) that Awards will become immediately vested and exercisable and will expire after a designated period of time to the extent not then exercised, (iii) that Awards will be assumed by another party to a transaction or otherwise be equitably converted or substituted in connection with such transaction, (iv) that outstanding Awards may be settled by payment in cash or cash equivalents equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the underlying Stock, as of a specified date associated with the transaction, over the exercise price of the Award, (v) that performance targets and performance periods for Performance Awards will be modified, consistent with Code Section 162(m) where applicable, or (vi) any combination of the foregoing. The Committee's determination need not be uniform and may be different for different Participants whether or not such Participants are similarly situated.

        15.3.    GENERAL.    Any discretionary adjustments made pursuant to this Article 15 shall be subject to the provisions of Section 16.2. To the extent that any adjustments made pursuant to this Article 15 cause Incentive Stock Options to cease to qualify as Incentive Stock Options, such Options shall be deemed to be Nonstatutory Stock Options.

ARTICLE 16
AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION

        16.1.    AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION.    The Board or the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, amend, modify or terminate the Plan without stockholder approval; provided, however, that if an amendment to the Plan would, in the reasonable opinion of the Board or the Committee, either (i) materially increase the number of Shares available under the Plan, (ii) expand the types of awards under the Plan, (iii) materially expand the class of participants eligible to participate in the Plan, (iv) materially extend the term of the Plan, or (v) otherwise constitute a material change requiring stockholder approval under applicable laws, policies or regulations or the applicable listing or other requirements of an Exchange, then such amendment shall be subject to stockholder approval; and provided, further, that the Board or Committee may condition any other amendment or modification on the approval of stockholders of the Company for any reason, including by reason of such approval being necessary or deemed advisable to (i) to comply with the listing or other requirements of an Exchange, or (ii) to satisfy any other tax, securities or other applicable laws, policies or regulations.

        16.2.    AWARDS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED.    At any time and from time to time, the Committee may amend, modify or terminate any outstanding Award without approval of the Participant; provided, however:

A-17


        16.3.    COMPLIANCE AMENDMENTS.    Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or in any Award Certificate to the contrary, the Committee may amend the Plan or an Award Certificate, to take effect retroactively or otherwise, as deemed necessary or advisable for the purpose of conforming the Plan or Award Certificate to any present or future law relating to plans of this or similar nature (including, but not limited to, Section 409A of the Code), and to the administrative regulations and rulings promulgated thereunder. By accepting an Award under this Plan, a Participant agrees to any amendment made pursuant to this Section 16.3 to any Award granted under the Plan without further consideration or action.

ARTICLE 17
GENERAL PROVISIONS

        17.1.    NO RIGHTS TO AWARDS; NON-UNIFORM DETERMINATIONS.    No Participant or any Eligible Participant shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan. Neither the Company, its Affiliates nor the Committee is obligated to treat Participants or Eligible Participants uniformly, and determinations made under the Plan may be made by the Committee selectively among Eligible Participants who receive, or are eligible to receive, Awards (whether or not such Eligible Participants are similarly situated).

        17.2.    NO STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS.    No Award gives a Participant any of the rights of a stockholder of the Company unless and until Shares are in fact issued to such person in connection with such Award.

        17.3.  SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATED TO SECTION 409A OF THE CODE.

A-18


        For purposes of this Plan, the term "Specified Employee" has the meaning given such term in Code Section 409A and the final regulations thereunder, provided, however, that, as permitted in such final regulations, the Company's Specified Employees and its application of the six-month delay rule of Code Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) shall be determined in accordance with rules adopted by the Board or any committee of the Board, which shall be applied consistently with respect to all nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements of the Company, including this Plan.

        17.4.    WITHHOLDING.    The Company or any Affiliate shall have the authority and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes (including the Participant's FICA obligation) required by law to be withheld with respect to any exercise, lapse of restriction or other taxable event arising as a result of the Plan. With respect to withholding required upon any taxable event under the Plan, the Committee may, at the time the Award is granted or thereafter, require or permit that any such withholding requirement be satisfied, in whole or in part, by withholding from the Award Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date of withholding equal to the minimum amount (and not any greater amount) required to be withheld for tax purposes, all in accordance with such procedures as the Committee establishes. All such elections shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

        17.5.    NO RIGHT TO CONTINUED SERVICE.    Nothing in the Plan, any Award Certificate or any other document or statement made with respect to the Plan, shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate any Participant's employment or status as an officer, director or consultant at any time, nor confer upon any Participant any right to continue as an employee, officer, director or consultant of the Company or any Affiliate, whether for the duration of a Participant's

A-19



Award or otherwise. Neither an Award nor any benefits arising under this Plan shall constitute an employment contract with the Company or any Affiliate and, accordingly, subject to Article 16, this Plan and the benefits hereunder may be terminated at any time in the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board of Directors without giving rise to any liability on the part of the Company or an of its Affiliates.

        17.6.    UNFUNDED STATUS OF AWARDS.    The Plan is intended to be an "unfunded" plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award Certificate shall give the Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company or any Affiliate. This Plan is not intended to be subject to ERISA.

        17.7.    RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER BENEFITS.    No payment under the Plan shall be taken into account in determining any benefits under any pension, retirement, savings, profit sharing, group insurance, welfare or benefit plan of the Company or any Affiliate unless provided otherwise in such other plan.

        17.8.    EXPENSES.    The expenses of administering the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Affiliates.

        17.9.    TITLES AND HEADINGS.    The titles and headings of the Sections in the Plan are for convenience of reference only, and in the event of any conflict, the text of the Plan, rather than such titles or headings, shall control.

        17.10.    GENDER AND NUMBER.    Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine; the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

        17.11.    FRACTIONAL SHARES.    No fractional Shares shall be issued and the Committee shall determine, in its discretion, whether cash shall be given in lieu of fractional Shares or whether such fractional Shares shall be eliminated by rounding up or down.

        17.12.  GOVERNMENT AND OTHER REGULATIONS.

A-20


        17.13.    GOVERNING LAW.    To the extent not governed by federal law, the Plan and all Award Certificates shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.

        17.14.    ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS.    Each Award Certificate may contain such other terms and conditions as the Committee may determine; provided that such other terms and conditions are not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan.

        17.15.    NO LIMITATIONS ON RIGHTS OF COMPANY.    The grant of any Award shall not in any way affect the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassification or changes in its capital or business structure or to merge, consolidate, dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets. The Plan shall not restrict the authority of the Company, for proper corporate purposes, to draft or assume awards, other than under the Plan, to or with respect to any person. If the Committee so directs, the Company may issue or transfer Shares to an Affiliate, for such lawful consideration as the Committee may specify, upon the condition or understanding that the Affiliate will transfer such Shares to a Participant in accordance with the terms of an Award granted to such Participant and specified by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan.

        17.16.    INDEMNIFICATION.    Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, or an officer of the Company to whom authority was delegated in accordance with Article 4 shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan and against and from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the Company's approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it on his or her own behalf, unless such loss, cost, liability, or expense is a result of his or her own willful misconduct or except as expressly provided by statute. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.

A-21


 

 

 

 

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc.

 

Date:

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Place:

Company Headquarters, 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632

Time:

9:00 am, Mountain Standard Time

 

Please make your marks like this: x Use dark black pencil or pen only
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR Proposals 1, 2, and 3

 

1. To elect directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their

For

Against

Abstain

successors are elected and qualified:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01 Steven R. Appleton

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

02 Teruaki Aoki

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

03 James W. Bagley

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

04 Robert L. Bailey

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

05 Mercedes Johnson

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

06 Lawrence N. Mondry

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

07 Robert E. Switz

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.

To approve an amendment to the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan to
increase the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder by 20,000,000

o

o

o

 

 

 

 

 

3.

To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of the Company for
the fiscal year ending September 1, 2011

o

o

o

 

 Please separate carefully at the perforation and return just this portion in the envelope provided. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authorized Signatures - This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please Sign Here

 

Please Date Above

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please Sign Here

 

Please Date Above

 

 

 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc. to be held

Thursday, December 16, 2010

For Holders as of October 18, 2010

 

 

  

INTERNET

TELEPHONE

 

 

    1-866-586-3108

Go To

www.proxypush.com/mu

· Cast your vote online.

OR

· Use any touch-tone telephone.

 

· Have your Proxy Card ready.

 

 

· Follow the simple recorded instructions.

 

 

MAIL

 

 

 

OR

·

Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card.

 

·

Detach your Proxy Card.

 

·

Return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid
envelope provided.

 

All votes must be received by 11:59 pm, Eastern Time, December 15, 2010.

 

 

PROXY TABULATOR FOR
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
P.O. BOX 8016
CARY, NC 27512-9903

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVENT #

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLIENT #

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2010 Mediant Communications LLC. All Rights Reserved


 

 

 

This Proxy is Solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

 

 

 

                      Revocable Proxy – Micron Technology, Inc.

 

 

 

On matters set forth on the opposite side, the undersigned shareholder(s) of Micron Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, each dated November 5, 2010, and hereby appoints Steven R. Appleton and D. Mark Durcan, and each of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc., to be held December 16, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., Mountain Standard Time, at the Company’s headquarters located at 8000 South Federal Way, Boise, Idaho 83716-9632, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, and to vote (including cumulatively, if required) all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth on the opposite side.

 

And in their discretion, upon such other matter or matters which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. The shares represented by this proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder(s). If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2, and 3. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, or if cumulative voting is required, the persons named in this proxy will vote in their discretion.

 

 

 

 

 

PROXY TABULATOR FOR
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
P.O. Box 8016
CARY, NC 27512-9903

 

 



QuickLinks

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
APPENDIX A